alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61658-CV-WILLIAMS

AZ55S, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLINSCO.COM, LLC,

Defendant.

/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle’s Report

and Recommendation on Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff for Spoliation 

of Evidence (DE 65) (“Report”). In the Report, Judge Valle recommends that the Court 

deny Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff for Spoliation of Evidence (DE 

54) (“Motion”). (DE 65 at 1.) Neither Party filed objections to the Report and the time to 

do so has passed.

Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable law, the 

Court agrees with Judge Valle’s well-reasoned analysis and conclusion that Defendant’s

Motion be denied. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report (DE 65) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Defendant’s Motion (DE 54) is DENIED.

Case 0:22-cv-61658-KMW Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 17th day of July, 2023.

Case 0:22-cv-61658-KMW Document 70 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/17/2023 Page 2 of 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5539

To extend for 9 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of title

11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To extend for 9 additional months the period for which

chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

4 Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law

5 105–277, as amended by Public Law 106–5 and Public

6 Law 106–70, is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2000’’ each place it ap8 pears and inserting ‘‘April 1, 2001’’; and

9 (2) in subsection (a)—
2

•HR 5539 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘September 30, 1999’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘June 30, 2000’’; and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘October 1, 1999’’ and in4 serting ‘‘July 1, 2000’’.

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

7 on July 1, 2000.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23197-CIV-ALTONAGA/Damian

PREPARED FOOD

PHOTOS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIAMI BEACH 411

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

____________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Show Cause

Why Defendant Should Not Be Held in Contempt [ECF No. 17], filed August 3, 2023. The

Court referred the Motion to United States Magistrate Judge Melissa Damian, who held an 

evidentiary hearing [ECF No. 22] and issued her Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 23] on 

September 13, 2023. The parties filed no objections to the Report. In a September 28, 2023 

Order [ECF No. 24], the Court ordered Defendant, Miami Beach 411 Corporation to show cause 

why it should not be adjudged in contempt. A hearing before the Undersigned was held on 

October 26, 2023, at which Defendant failed to appear. (See Show Cause Hr’g [ECF No. 27]). 

After reviewing the record, Plaintiff’s written submissions, Magistrate Judge Damian’s 

Report, hearing from Plaintiff at the October 26, 2023 hearing, and being otherwise fully 

advised, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [ECF No. 23] is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED.

2. The Court finds that Defendant willfully violated the Court’s July 14, 2023 Order

Case 1:22-cv-23197-CMA Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-23197-CIV-ALTONAGA/Damian

2

[ECF No. 16], requiring it to serve responses to Plaintiff’s Post-Judgment 

Discovery Requests.

2. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in 

connection with its efforts to secure Defendant’s compliance with the Court’s July 

14, 2023 Order, as a sanction for Defendant’s failure to comply with the Court’s 

Order.

3. Defendant shall pay a fine of $50.00 per day for sixty (60) days beginning 

November 1, 2023, or until Defendant purges itself of the civil contempt.

4. Defendant may purge itself of its contempt by responding to Plaintiff’s PostJudgment Discovery Responses in compliance with the July 14, 2023 Order and 

filing a notice of compliance with the Court indicating such.

5. Plaintiff’s counsel shall provide a copy of this Order to Defendant through 

certified mail (or other form of service providing for tracking and requiring a 

signature upon receipt) and shall file a notice of compliance that includes 

evidence of receipt by Defendant, no later than October 30, 2023.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 27th day of October, 2023.

________________________________________

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-23197-CMA Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2023 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 183-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5670 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5670

 To ensure that the receipts and disbursements of the Social Security 
       trust funds are not included in a unified Federal budget.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2000

  Mr. Kasich introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that the receipts and disbursements of the Social Security 
       trust funds are not included in a unified Federal budget.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUNDS FROM THE 
              UNIFIED FEDERAL BUDGET.

     Any official statement issued by the Office of Management and 
Budget or by the Congressional Budget Office of surplus or deficit 
totals of the budget of the United States Government as submitted by 
the President or of the surplus or deficit totals of the congressional 
budget, and any description of, or reference to, such totals in any 
official publication or material issued by either of such Offices, 
shall exclude the receipts and disbursements totals of the Federal Old-
Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability 
Insurance Trust Fund (including taxes upon which any such receipts are 
based).
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 70 
          - [NC-FORS-T5-2000-01b; FRL-6712-4] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        EPA proposes full approval of the operating permit program of Forsyth County, North Carolina. In the final rules section of this                         **Federal Register**                        , EPA is approving the County's operating permit program as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. An explanation for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time.                     

# DATES:

Written comments must be received by July 24, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Address comments to Kim Pierce, Regional Title V Program Manager, Operating Source Section, Air & Radiation Technology Branch, EPA, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Copies of the County's submittals and other supporting documentation relevant to this action are available for inspection during normal business hours at EPA, Air & Radiation Technology Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kim Pierce, EPA, Region 4, at (404) 562-9124. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    For additional information see the direct final rule which is published in the final rules section of this                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: June 8, 2000. 

Phyllis P. Harris, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 00-15291 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### EUGENE N. ROBINSON and others, Respondents, *v.*JOHN NORRIS, Appellant.

*Stock broker*— commissions *paid on borrowing money for principal*— duty *of principal as to*— *loam by broiccr himself.*

Where a broker,- authorized by his principal to borrow money in order to carry stocks for him, renders an account to him, by which it appears that in borrowing money he has been compelled to pay to other persons as commissions sums exceeding the amount allowed by 2 Revised Statutes (5th ed.), 979, for effecting loans, it is the duty of the principal promptly to object to the payment of such commissions, and in case he fail so to do, he cannot, in an action by the broker to recover a balance due to him, insist that such payments were illegal and unauthorized.

Where, however, the broker is himself the lender of the money, he cannot charge a rate of interest beyond that allowed by statute, and the assent of the customer to the payment of such excess of interest, cannot affect the operation of the laws forbidding usury.

■ Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

*234
      *Thomas Oorlebt,*for appellant. *JohnE. Burrill,*for respondents.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 548 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 548

     To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for a just 
      apportionment of Representatives in Congress for all States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

  Mrs. Maloney of New York (for herself, Mr. Frost, Mr. Clyburn, Ms. 
  Roybal-Allard, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Blagojevich, Mr. Brady of 
   Pennsylvania, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. 
Conyers, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Filner, Mr. 
 Ford, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Hoyer, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Ms. Lee, Ms. 
Lofgren, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Menendez, Ms. Millender-McDonald, 
 Mr. Pascrell, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Sawyer, Mr. Serrano, Mr. 
Shows, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Ms. Waters, and 
Ms. Velazquez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for a just 
      apportionment of Representatives in Congress for all States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF SAMPLING.

    Section 195 of title 13, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``Except for the determination of population for purposes of 
apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several States, 
the'' and inserting ``The''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 102-75.790 What responsibilities do landholding agencies and disposal agencies have concerning properties to be used for correctional facility, law enforcement, or emergency management response purposes?

Both landholding and disposal agencies must cooperate to the fullest extent possible with Federal and State agency representatives in their inspection of such property and in furnishing information relating to the property.
#### § 102-75.950 Who has the responsibility for paying property-related obligations pending transfer or disposal of the property?

Except as otherwise provided in § 102-75.230, the landholding agency is still responsible for any and all operational costs and expenses or other property-related obligations pending transfer or disposal of the property.
2016 Tribal Applicant Training

Foster Grandparent Program and Senior Companion Prog
Session Outcomes

• By the end of this session, participants wil

– Understand each section of the Foster Grandpa

Program and Senior Companion Program granapplication

– Identify key pieces of information to aid in your 

application development

– Locate resources to help you develop your app
Grant Application Documents

• Notice of Funding Opportunity (not yet ope• Grant Application Instructions• Appendices• Performance Measures Worksheets
Performance Measures

And Work Plans
What is Performance Measurement

• Performance Measurement is: 

– The ongoing monitoring and reporting of 

program accomplishments and progress

• Performance Measures are:

– Outputs: 

– Amount of service provided 

– Outcomes: 

– Reflect the changes or benefits that 

occur 
Building Blocks of a Work Plan
Why Measure Performance?

• Impact on who benefits and how• Accountability to funders and stakeholders• Program improvement
Performance Measures

Workbook Activities
Narratives

Strengthening Communities, Recruitment and Development o
Narratives

Program Management, Organizational Capacity
§ 952.9 Filing; docketing and serving documents. ( a ) Unless the presiding officer permits otherwise, all documents must be filed using the electronic filing system. Documents submitted using the electronic filing system are considered filed as of the date/time (Eastern Time) reflected in the system. Documents mailed to the Recorder are considered filed on the date mailed as evidenced by a United States Postal Service postmark. Filings by any other means are considered filed upon receipt by the Recorder of a complete copy of the filing during normal business hours. Discovery need not be filed except as may be sought to be included in the record, or as may be ordered by the presiding officer.
( b ) Documents shall be dated and state the docket number and title of the proceeding. Any pleading or other document required by order of the presiding officer to be filed by a specified date must be received in the electronic filing system or by the Recorder on or before such date. If both parties are participating in the electronic filing system, separate service upon the opposing party is not required. Otherwise, documents shall be served personally or by mail on the opposing party, noting on the document filed, or on the transmitting letter, that a copy has been so furnished.
[81 FR 40192, June 21, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Eshaba Jahir-Sharuz, Esq., of the law firm Dimond Kaplan 

& Rothstein, P.A., hereby enters her appearance as counsel for Defendant William Trevor Lawrence 

and requests that copies of all future pleadings, orders, and other papers filed or served in this matter 

be served on her via CM/ECF or at the address listed below, as appropriate

Date: February 23, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

DIMOND KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A.

Offices at Grand Bay Plaza

2665 South Bayshore Drive, PH-2B

Miami, Florida 33133

Telephone: (305) 374-1920

Facsimile: (305) 374-1961

By: /s Eshaba Jahir-Sharuz

Eshaba Jahir-Sharuz, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 1038846

 Eshaba@dkrpa.com

Counsel for Defendant 

William Trevor Lawrence

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2023 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                        AAVID THERMAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



Name                                                 Site of Incorporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aavid Thermal Technologies, Inc.                     Delaware
Aavid Thermal Products, Inc.                         New Hampshire
Aavid Laboratories, Inc.                             New Hampshire
Aavid Thermal Technologies of Texas, Inc.            New Hampshire
Aavid Thermal Products, Ltd.                         U.K.
Aavid Engineering, GmbH                              Germany
Aavid Thermal Products of Canada, Inc.               Ontario, Canada
Aavid Engineering (S) Pte. Ltd.                      Singapore
Aavid Taiwan, Inc.                                   Taiwan
Aavid Japan, K.K.                                    Japan
Aavid China, Inc.                                    British Virgin Islands
Aavid Air Systems, Inc.                              New Hampshire

Fluent, Inc.                                         New Hampshire
Fluent Asia-Pacific Company, Ltd.                    Japan
Fluent India Pvt. Ltd.                               India
Fluent Europe, Ltd.                                  U.K.
Fluent Deutschland, GmbH                             Germany
Fluent Sweden AB                                     Sweden
Fluent Italia Srl.                                   Italy
Fluent France, S.A.                                  France
Polyflow, S.A.                                       Belgium


                                     - 52 -
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
OF THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
   
  
 
  
  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 
 
 Date:   September 16, 2005
    /s/ Craig T. DavenportCraig T. DavenportChief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            271449
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           271970
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             271985
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  271970
<CASH>                                            3677
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              351460
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                            8682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  679333
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 416517
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             128672
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7079
<OTHER-SE>                                       67190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    679333
<PREMIUMS>                                       73317
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              12188
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 910
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    5783
<BENEFITS>                                       67276
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      12323
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                              9335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2818
<INCOME-TAX>                                       985
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1833
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>