alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Declaration of Disaster #3260]
 Grayson County and the contiguous counties of Breckinridge, Butler, Edmonson, Hardin, Hart, and Ohio in the Commonwealth of Kentucky constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and tornadoes that occurred on May 23, 2000. Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the close of business on August 3, 2000 and for economic injury until the close of business on March 5, 2001 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308. The interest rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage*:HOMEOWNERS WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
7.375HOMEOWNERS WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
3.687BUSINESSES WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
8.000BUSINESSES AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
4.000OTHERS (INCLUDING NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS) WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
6.750*For Economic Injury*:BUSINESSES AND SMALL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE
4.000
 The numbers assigned to this disaster are 326012 for physical damage and 9H4700 for economic injury. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008) Dated: June 7, 2000. Kris Swedin, Acting Administrator.


[FR Doc. 00-15284 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
                        C.E.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(B) AND 15D-14(B)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 27, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.

/s/ Michael A. Richardson
______________________________________
Michael A. Richardson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  October 11, 2005
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

LA/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICARDO TOPETE CURIEL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-71639

Agency No. A091-107-546

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Ricardo Topete Curiel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted

FILED

JAN 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
LA/Research 2 06-71639

in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for

abuse of discretion, Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 890 (9th Cir.

2002), we deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse her discretion in denying Topete Curiel’s motion to

reopen because he did not meet his burden to establish that his panic attack

constituted “exceptional circumstances” under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(1). See id. at

892 (agency properly denied motion to reopen supported only by alien’s

declaration that he suffered an asthma attack and hospital form that did not indicate

severity of illness).

Petitioner’s remaining contentions are not supported by the record.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                     5207167
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           5207167
<PP&E>                                      240208
<DEPRECIATION>                              (17708)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             5540395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      6500909
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    158071
<OTHER-SE>                                (1118585)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               5540395
<SALES>                                       3500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              3500
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              4626261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            511962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          388571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (5523294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (5523294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (5523294)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.40)

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5003369 v1

BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Application of

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

under 49 U.S.C. § 41718 for pendente lite authority to

operate slot exemptions between Ronald Reagan

Washington National Airport and Kansas City

(DCA-MCI)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND RESPONSE OF REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Scott L. Durgin

Vice President, Administration

Ethan J. Blank,

Vice President, General Counsel

REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

8909 Purdue Road

Indianapolis, Indiana 46268

Robert E. Cohn

Patrick R. Rizzi

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

+1 202 637 4999/5659

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

Counsel for

REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

August 13, 2013
\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5003369 v1

BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Application of

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

under 49 U.S.C. § 41718 for pendente lite authority to

operate slot exemptions between Ronald Reagan

Washington National Airport and Kansas City

(DCA-MCI)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182

August 13, 2013

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND RESPONSE OF REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

The unauthorized Reply of Southwest Airlines Co. (“Southwest”), dated August

12, 2013, provides no new information other than confirming the accuracy of what

Republic Airline Inc. (“Republic”) told the Department in its Answer in Opposition.1 That

is, as Southwest concedes, the “factual predicate for Southwest’s July 29 application” for

pendente lite exemption authority to use Republic’s two slot exemptions for DCA-MCI

service has “ceased to exist”. (Southwest Reply at 4.) Accordingly, the Department

should expeditiously dismiss Southwest’s application.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert E. Cohn

Patrick R. Rizzi

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Counsel for

REPUBLIC AIRLINE INC.

1

If the Department grants Southwest leave to file its Reply, then fairness dictates (and good cause

exists) for the Department to grant Republic leave to file this Response to ensure a complete and accurate

record is before the Department. See 14 C.F.R. 302.6(b).
\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5003369 v1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Response of Republic Airline Inc. has

been served this 13th day of August 2013, upon each of the following persons:

bob.kneisley@wnco.com; leslie.abbott@wnco.com; mark_vanloh@kcmo.org;

tom_mckenna@kcmo.org; todd.homan@dot.gov; Dennis.devany@dot.gov;

brian.ctr.meehan@faa.gov; peter.irving@dot.gov.; cindy.baraban@dot.gov;

bob.goldner@dot.gov; Phil.Sunderland@MWAA.com; info@airlineinfo.com

Jonathan Echmalian
#### § 101-39.400 General.

Officials, employees, and contractors responsible for the operation of General Services Administration (GSA) Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS) vehicles shall exercise every precaution to prevent accidents. In case of an accident, the employee or official concerned shall comply with the procedures established by this subpart.

[56 FR 59891, Nov. 26, 1991]
§ 3040.211 Limitations applicable to market dominant mail matter. ( a ) The Postal Service shall inform the Commission of updates to size and weight limitations for market dominant mail matter by filing notice with the Commission 45 days prior to the effective date of the proposed update. The notice shall: ( 1 ) Include a copy of the applicable sections of the Mail Classification Schedule and the proposed updates therein in legislative format;
( 2 ) Describe the likely impact that the proposed update will have on users of the product(s) and on competitors; and
( 3 ) Describe how the proposed update is in accordance with the policies and the applicable criteria of chapter 36 of title 39 of the United States Code.
( b ) The Commission shall provide notice of the proposed update in the Federal Register and seek public comment on whether the proposed update is in accordance with the policies and the applicable criteria of chapter 36 of title 39 of the United States Code.
( c ) If the Commission finds the proposed update in accordance with the policies and the applicable criteria of chapter 36 of 39 U.S.C., the Commission shall review the proposed Mail Classification Schedule language for formatting and conformance with the structure of the Mail Classification Schedule, and subject to editorial changes, shall change the Mail Classification Schedule to coincide with the effective date of the proposed update.
( d ) If the Commission finds the proposed update not in accordance with the policies and the applicable criteria of chapter 36 of title 39 of the United States Code, the Commission may direct other action as deemed appropriate.
[72 FR 63698, Nov. 9, 2007, as amended at 84 FR 32317, July 8, 2019. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Section 508","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6qCGZqxyoj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/section-508\/\">Section 508<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/section-508\/embed\/#?secret=6qCGZqxyoj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Section 508” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"6qCGZqxyoj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
<Page>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY




       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Donald E. Steen, Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik and each of
them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his
behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United
Surgical Partners International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite
and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents
and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.






                                            /s/ Paul B. Queally
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Paul B. Queally
Argued and submitted April 12,

reversed and remanded with instructions May 17, 1995

#### GUADALUPE VISCARRO RIVAS, *Respondent, v.*Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, *Appellant.*

(91C-11760; CA A72583)

895 P2d 356

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

No appearance for respondent.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate original sentence. *Mora v. Maass,*120 Or App 173, 851 P2d 1154 (1993), *aff’d by an equally divided court,*319 Or 570 (1994).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is _____________________________________.

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the 

FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC,

d/b/a Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively 

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River 

and the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is 

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein 

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by 

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Dated ______________, 2023. Signed:_________________________

Printed Name:____________________

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: _________________________________ Tel No.:___________________________

_________________________________ Email: ____________________________

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156 / brian@fairlawattorney.com

TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1

Noelle Casassa

September 11 Noelle Casassa

Noelle Casassa

117 S Gordon Road 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

305-724-7047

casassanoelle@gmail.com

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 207-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2023 Page 1 of 1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KATARIUS BRANTLEY
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 443

[ October 5, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Geoffrey D. Cohen , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. . 14000640

CF10A and 14004347 CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. Concepc ion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, M AY and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order entered December 6, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 01281

- CV

KENNETH W. MORRISON, RICK ADAMS, AND STO NECOAT OF TEXAS, LLC , Appellant s

V.

JOHN D. PRO FANCHIK, SR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 02057

- 2015



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ December 5, 2018 unopposed motion to extend time to

file reply brief

. We GRANT the m otion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 4,

2019.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 30180 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

− Appellee
,

v ersus

ROT VAN NGUYEN, also known as Minh Dung, also known as Minh Dung Duong
,

Defendant

− Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana No. 2:18

- CR

- 28

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rot Van Nguyen has

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 24, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30180 Document: 00515172259 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2019No. 19

- 30180

2 moved to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. Califor

nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nguyen h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record.

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non

frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further respon si bilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-30180 Document: 00515172259 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2019
Secondary/Administrative Data Use: 

Evaluation Plan/Reporting Checklist 

This is a general checklist of information that grantees/practitioners, evaluators and funders 

can use in preparing, reviewing and monitoring evaluation plans and reports for evaluation 

studies that involve the use of secondary or administrative data. The information included in 

this checklist is expected to be included in good and high quality evaluation plans and final 

reports that employ these sources of data. We hope you find the checklist helpful. Feel free to 

share or adapt this AmeriCorps resource to fit your needs with appropriate citation. 

Data Use Steps Information to Collect and Communicate – 

Administrative and Secondary Data 

Included 

in Report? 

Source of Data 

Reasons for using secondary/administrative data 

What data is used (e.g., NLSY, city/county data, school 

administrative data) and source? 

Steps to receiving and storing the data 

Direct Data Collection 

(i.e., not secondary/ 

administrative data) 

Study design of data collection by researcher/ 

evaluator: Full details of study sample, measurement 

content, and procedures 

Merging Direct and 

Secondary/ 

Administrative Data 

Data cleaning procedures 

Data variable adjustment and calculation procedures 

Data merging procedures 

Any adjustments to weights and/or structure 

necessary to make them consistent across the two 

data sources 

Final dataset description (include variables and 

generalizability) 

Office of Research & Evaluation | July 2013 | Updated July 2021 1 
 

 

 

Secondary/Administrative Data Use: Evaluation Plan/Reporting Checklist 

Data Use Steps Information to Collect and Communicate – 

Administrative and Secondary Data 

Included 

in Report? 

Logistical Issues 

when Employing 

Secondary/ 

Administrative Data 

Evaluator experience, expertise, and relationships 

with data sources 

Details of agreements for data access, storage, use, 

reporting 

Details of Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), and 

any strategies/relationships that will facilitate data 

delivery and/or use 

For QED Comparison 

Group Formation: 

Data Contents 

Final dataset variables description 

Data collection time points 

Structure of final data (nesting/weights) 

For QED Comparison 

Group Formation: 

Matching Procedure 

Method of matching 

Proportion of sample matched 

Significant differences between treatment and 

comparison groups post-matching 

Any characteristics unique to either the treatment or 

comparison group (i.e., perfect confounds), or other 

programs 

AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation. (2013, July 1). Secondary/Administrative Data Use: 

Evaluation Plan/Reporting Checklist. AmeriCorps. 

https://americorps.gov/sites/default/files/document/2015_05_13_SIFSecondaryAdministrativeDataUseandReportingChecklist_ORE.pdf 

Office of Research & Evaluation |July 2013 | Updated July 2021 2