alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1113

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff ─ Appellant,

v.

TOWNE BANK; WILLIAM A. COPELAND; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; ROBERT 

HENRY BURGER; ROBERT L. SAMUELS, JR.; CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA; 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA; 

RAYMOND A. JACKSON,

Defendants ─ Appellees.

No. 11-1117

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; SARA A. JOHN; STUART GORDON; 

JOHN C. LUMPKIN; JOHN C. LUMPKIN, P.C.; JON AHERN; SYKES, 

BOURBON, AHERN & LEVY P.C.; JOSEPH FRANKLIN VERSER; LEONARD C. 

HEATH, JR.; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; TOWNE 

MORTGAGE; TOWNE BANK; WILLIAM A. COPELAND; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN,

Defendants – Appellees.
2

No. 11-1231

ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; 

STUART GORDON; SARA A. JOHN, Esq.; JOHN C. LUMPKIN, Esq.; JOHN 

C. LUMPKIN P.C.; JOHN AHERN, Esq.; JOSEPH FRANKLIN VERSER, Esq.; 

LEONARD C. HEATH, JR., Esq.; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY; TOWNE-MORTGAGE; TOWNE BANK; WILLIAM COPELAND; 

WILLIAM T. HODSDEN,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith; Raymond 

A. Jackson, District Judges. (2:10-cv-00437-RBS-FBS; 2:10-cv00434-RBS-FBS; 2:10-cv-00614-RBS-FBS)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., 

appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil 

complaints without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon 

which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the records and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Towne Bank, 

No. 2:10-cv-00437-RBS-FBS; Patterson v. Teide Enters., Inc., No. 

2:10-cv-00434-RBS-FBS; and Patterson v. United States, No. 2:10-

cv-00614-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2010; Nov. 5, 2010; and 

Jan. 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 101-30.601 Objective.

GSA supply catalogs are primarily designed to aid in the acquisition of GSA centrally managed, stocked, and issued items available from GSA supply facilities by Federal civilian agencies and other organizations authorized to use the GSA Federal Supply Service (FSS) stock program as a source of supply. GSA also provides information relative to other FSS sales programs and GSA services.

[46 FR 35646, July 10, 1981]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,292
<PP&E>                                       1,599,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                 274,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,793,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,977,712
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,992,545
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,177,009)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (184,464)
<SALES>                                          5,350
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,893
<CGS>                                            3,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,606,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,590,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,590,370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (58,346)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,648,716)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)


</TABLE>
#### § 102-71.5 What is the scope and philosophy of the General Services Administration's (GSA) real property policies?

GSA's real property policies contained in this part and parts 102-72 through 102-82 of this chapter apply to Federal agencies, including GSA's Public Buildings Service (PBS), operating under, or subject to, the authorities of the Administrator of General Services. These policies cover the acquisition, management, utilization, and disposal of real property by Federal agencies that initiate and have decision-making authority over actions for real property services. The detailed guidance implementing these policies is contained in separate customer service guides.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

 Petitioner 

v.

MICHAEL B. FEIN,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2709 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 147 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 12250

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of June, 2020, upon consideration of the Report and 

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Michael B. Fein is suspended from the Bar 

of this Commonwealth for a period of six months, and he shall comply with all the 

provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          66,253                  66,253
<SECURITIES>                                    26,429                  26,429
<RECEIVABLES>                                      264                     264
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,143                   3,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,609                  99,609
<PP&E>                                          32,964                  32,964
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (20,316)                (20,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,487                 119,487
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,253                  11,253
<BONDS>                                        312,815                 312,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                         24                      24
<COMMON>                                            19                      19
<OTHER-SE>                                    (225,386)               (225,386)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,487                 119,487
<SALES>                                            258                   1,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   258                   1,957
<CGS>                                              566                   4,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,942                  79,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,296                  39,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (46,446)               (131,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (46,446)               (131,201)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (46,446)               (131,201)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.51)                  (7.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.51)                  (7.29)


</TABLE>
eriC ps Se ors funding:

Appendix G: Unduplicated

Volunteer Calculator 

Overview 

Organizations applying for traditional RSVP projects or Senior Demonstration Program 

projects that have non-stipended volunteers must place at least one unduplicated 

volunteer in a workplan that results in National Performance Measure Outcomes for 

every $1,000 in AmeriCorps Seniors funding. 

Common arithmetic rules should be used to determine how to round VSYs for 

outcome-based work plans. Applicants should round to the nearest whole number. 

For example, an AmeriCorps Seniors applicant with a non-stipended program 

requesting $105,425 in federal funding would require 105.4 unduplicated volunteers 

in work plans that result in national performance measure outcomes (105,425/1,000 

=105.4). This would be rounded down to 105 unduplicated volunteers in work plans 

that result in national performance measure outcomes. Likewise, an applicant with 

$268,750 in federal funding (268.8 unduplicated volunteers in outcome-based work 

plans) would round up and require 269 unduplicated volunteers in work plans that 

result in national performance measures outcomes. 

Unduplicated Volunteer Calculator 

In the field below, enter the amount of AmeriCorps Seniors funding you are applying 

for. The number of unduplicated volunteers you have to place into outcome-based 

workplans for that amount of funding will be calculated for you. 

Amount of Am Amount of AmeriCorps Seniors funding: or ni

Amount of funding / 1000: 

Number of unduplicated volunteers you 

have to place in outcome-based workplans:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

R ONALD FAY SCHERMERHORN

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 236

- C R

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant C ounty, Texas

(TC# 1323955R )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ant ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief un til January 7, 2014

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELL ANT ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Brian Salvant

, the Appell ant ’ s attorney, prepare the

Appell ant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 7, 2014

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18 th day of December , 20 1 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez , JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,

Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





In connection with the Annual Report of Health Enhancement Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Howard R. Baer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date:  May 13, 2005

/s/ Howard R. Baer



Howard R. Baer

Chief Executive Officer







A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753- MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO HAC VICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Michele D. Johnson of the law firm Latham & Watkins LLP

appears as counsel for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal, and requests that all papers served in this case 

also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Per Rule 4(b)(4) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, Ms. Johnson was previously admitted 

to appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen

and states that all information provided in support of her initial pro hac vice motion remains current 

and correct, including the sponsoring co-counsel.

Dated: May 8, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 182 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida Bar No. 305596 

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 182 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2

               CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB


     I, Joanna Hoover, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ITIS Holdings
Inc., a Nevada Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 18, 2005
-----------------------

/s/ Joanna Hoover
-----------------
Name: Joanna Hoover
Title: Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Charles A. Hasper, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of The Allied Defense Group,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 9, 2004
    /s/   Charles A. HasperCharles A. Hasper,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
##### 



Exhibit 15 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: Re: Registration Statement
Nos. 333-45525, 333-13584, 333-88681, 333-101849, 333-115979,
333-115980, 333-115981, 333-130793 and 333-130792. Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated May 5, 2006 related to our review of
interim financial information. Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant,
or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act. /s/ KPMG LLP Washington, D.C.
May 5, 2006
#### § 101-29.221 Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Description Program (Federal Standardization Program).

The *Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Description Program* is a standardization program developed under authority of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (63 Stat. 377) in consonance with the Defense Cataloging and Standardization Act (Sections 2451-2456, title 10, U.S.C. chapter 145), managed by the General Services Administration, for the purpose of coordinating civilian and military standardization functions to avoid unnecessary duplication. Within the program, procedures and controls govern the development, coordination, approval, issuance, indexing, management, and maintenance of product descriptions in the Federal series (Federal specifications, Federal standards, and CID's) that define commercial products and products that have high potential for common Federal agency use.
#### § 102-75.325 What responsibility does the landholding agency have to provide persons the opportunity to inspect available surplus property?

Landholding agencies should provide all persons interested in acquiring available surplus property with the opportunity to make a complete inspection of the property, including any available inventory records, plans, specifications, and engineering reports that relate to the property. These inspections are subject to any necessary national security restrictions and are subject to the disposal agency's rules. (See §§ 102-75.335 and 102-75.985.)
NUMBER 13-14-00581-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

LUPE RIVERA, Appellant,

v.

LETICIA “LETTY” LOPEZ, Appellee.

On appeal from the 370th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Lupe Rivera, has filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment in this 

case pursuant to the Texas Election Code. See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 232.014 (West, 

Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.). According to his notice of appeal, the trial court signed 

an order ordering a new election in this case on September 25, 2014. The trial court has 
2

not entered an order pertaining to the deadline for filing the trial court record in the 

appellate court or entered any other orders to expedite the appeal. See id.

Accordingly, the Court orders the clerk’s record and reporters’ record to be filed in 

this cause within ten days from the date of this order. Appellant’s brief will then be due 

within fourteen days from the date that the appellate record has been filed, and appellee’s 

brief will be due seven days thereafter. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

20th day of October, 2014.
#### § 954.3 Informal dispositions.

These rules do not preclude the informal dispositions of Periodicals mailing privilege matters before or after institution of proceedings.

[36 FR 11567, June 16, 1971, as amended at 62 FR 66998, Dec. 23, 1997]