alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
250 E Street SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000/ 800-942-2677

IPv6 Memorandum

TO: Corporation for National and Community Service dba AmeriCorps

FROM: Pape Cisse, PhD, Chief Information Officer

SUBJECT: AmeriCorps Office of Information Technology Completes Transition to Internet 

Protocol version 6 (IPv6)

In accordance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum 21-07 (M-21-07), 

dated November 19, 2020, by Fiscal Year (FY) 2023, all new AmeriCorps Office of Information

Technology (OIT) information systems must be IPv6-enabled at the time of deployment. It is 

also the strategic intent of OIT to phase out the use of IPv4 for all current systems as soon as 

practical by meeting the milestones laid out by M-21-07, to include at least 80% of IP-enabled 

assets OIT networks operating in IPv6-only environments by the end of FY 2025. 

This memorandum designates Paul Lane, Senior Network Engineer, Infrastructure Services, as 

the lead of the OIT IPv6 Integrated Project Team (IPT) to coordinate these actions. The IPT is 

responsible for developing and overseeing the overall IPv6 transition plan including strategies, 

acquisitions, processes, status, and milestones. In addition, system owners will ensure that 

system documentation, details, and plans for transitioning to IPv6 align with the Agency’s 

overall IPv6 Implementation Plan. 

In support of this mandate, designated key stakeholders identified within the IPT must: 

● Provide strategies, processes, status, and milestones for inclusion in the Agency’s overall 

IPv6 implementation plan

● Collaborate with OIT to identify opportunities for IPv6 pilots on operational systems and 

nominate them to the IPT

● Oversee implementation of the AmeriCorps’s IPv6 implementation plan 

● Work with OIT to ensure that processes for approving new systems for operation, or 

upgrading existing systems, include a review of the system’s IPv6 readiness to ensure 

consistency with the Agency’s overall IPv6 implementation plan

● Work with OIT to ensure processes are in place requiring that all new agency acquisitions are 

capable of operating in an IPv6-only environment by the milestones established in the IPv6

implementation plan.

For questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Terrence King, Authorizing Official 

Designated Representative (AODR) at tking@cns.gov.

References: OMB Memorandum M-21-07
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6244

DONALD EDWARD SMITH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JENNIFER AD K INS, FNP , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:19

- ct

- 03332

- BO )

Submitted : November 22 , 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Donald Edward Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Coull Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, N orth Carolina, for Appellee s
.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6244 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Donald Edward Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claim under

Bivens ∗ for failure to state a claim and his claim under the Federal Tort Claim s Act for lack of subject matter jurisdiction . We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Smith v. United States , No. 5:19

- ct

- 03332

- BO (E.D. N.C. Feb. 17,
2022 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). USCA4 Appeal: 22-6244 Doc: 15 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
HOW ARD COHAN, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

300 N CONGRESS LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 22-81071-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS 

a Florida Limited Liability Company, 

Defendants. 

I ---------------

O RD ER CLOSING CASE 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal 

with Prejudice, filed on September 16, 2022. (DE 10). The Court congratulates the Parties on 

their amicable resolution of this matter and notes that pursuant to Anago Franchising, Inc. v. 

Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012), the Parties' Stipulation is self-executing and no 

Order of the Court is required to dismiss this action. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this CASE and 

DENY all pending motions AS MOOT. 

SIGNED in Chambers in West Palm Beach, Florida, this ~ da of September, 2022. 

Copies to: Counsel of Record 

ALD M. MIDDLEBROOKS 

UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 9:22-cv-81071-DMM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-37.385 Who determines if a prospective donee applicant is eligible to receive surplus property under this subpart? ( a ) For most public and nonprofit activities, the SASP determines if an applicant is eligible to receive property as a public agency, a nonprofit educational or public health institution, or for a program for older individuals. A SASP may request GSA assistance or guidance in making such determinations.
( b ) For applicants that offer courses of instruction devoted to the military arts and sciences, the Defense Department will determine eligibility to receive surplus property through the SASP as a service educational activity or SEA.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6277

ANGELO APPLEWHITE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LARRY DAIL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-hc-02005-D)

Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 30, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo Applewhite, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Angelo Applewhite seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as 

untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on January 4, 2019. Thus, 

Applewhite had until February 4, 2019,

* to file a notice of appeal. Applewhite’s notice 

of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on February 7, 2019. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 

266, 276 (1988) (holding that pro se prisoner’s notice of appeal is considered filed 

moment it is delivered to prison authorities for mailing to court). Because Applewhite

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We deny 

Applewhite’s motion for permission to appeal sentence modification under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2012), and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

 * The 30-day appeal period expired on Sunday, February 3. The notice of appeal 

was, therefore, due on the next business day. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1)(C).
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al. on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants. 

__________________________________/

NOTICE OF FILING REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONSES

Plaintiffs hereby give notice of filing request for issuance of summons to Defendant

Solomid Corporation, d/b/a Team Solomid, TSM, and/or TSM FTX.

Dated: May 15, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

By: /s/ Adam Moskowitz 

Adam M. Moskowitz

Florida Bar No. 984280

Joseph M. Kaye

Florida Bar No. 117520

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

adam@moskowitz-law.com 

joseph@moskowitz-law.com

By: /s/ David Boies 

David Boies (Pro Hac Vice)

Alex Boies (Pro Hac Vice)

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street

Armonk, NY 10504

Phone: (914) 749–8200

dboies@bsfllp.com

aboies@bsfllp.com

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 206 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23753

By: /s/ Stephen Neal Zack 

Stephen Neal Zack

Florida Bar No. 145215

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800

Miami, FL 33131

Office: 305-539-8400

szack@bsfllp.com

By: /s/ Stuart Z. Grossman

Stuart Z. Grossman

Florida Bar No.: 156113

Manuel A. Arteaga-Gomez

Florida Bar No.: 18122

GROSSMAN ROTH YAFFA COHEN, P.A.

2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 1150

Coral Gables, FL 33134 Ph: 305-442-8666

Fx: 305-285-1668

szg@grossmanroth.com

aag@grossmanroth.com

By: /s/ Jose M. Ferrer

Jose M. Ferrer 

Florida Bar No. 173746 

Michelle Genet Bernstein 

Florida Bar No. 1030736 

MARK MIGDAL & HAYDEN 

80 S.W. 8th Street, Suite 1999 

Miami, Florida 33130 

Telephone: (305) 374-0440 

jose@markmigdal.com 

michelle@markmigdal.com 

eservice@markmigdal.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Class

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the forgoing was filed on May 15, 2023, via 

the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys of record

By: /s/ Adam M. Moskowitz__

 ADAM M. MOSKOWITZ

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 206 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-74.350 Are agencies required to meet their obligations under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Act where there is an exclusive representative for the employees prior to implementing this smoking policy?

Yes. Where there is an exclusive representative for the employees, Federal agencies must meet their obligations under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 71, Labor-Management Relations, prior to implementing this section. In all other cases, agencies may consult directly with employees.

[73 FR 77518, Dec. 19, 2008]
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                    SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


         In connection with the Annual Report of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Mark A. Kopser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Mark A. Kopser
------------------------
Mark A. Kopser
Chief Financial Officer

March 11, 2004
<PAGE>









                                                                      Exhibit 23

                            HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                           Certified Public Accountant
                               (216) 491-0800 Fax
                                 (216) 491-0803
                                  April 9, 2003

To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc.,  Certified Public Accountant,  consents to
the  incorporation  by reference  of its report  dated  November 12, 2002 on the
Financial  Statements  of AuGRID  Corporation  (the  "Company")  included in the
Company's  report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002
in the Company's  Registration  Statements of Form S-8,  Commission File Numbers
333-97683 and 333-97747.


Respectfully,
/s/ Henry L. Creel





          HENRY L. CREEL, CPA 3587 LEE ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44120
<PAGE>
§ 102-74.240 What are Federal agencies' occupant emergency responsibilities? Federal agencies, upon approval from GSA, must— ( a ) Provide emergency program policy guidance;
( b ) Review plans and organizations annually;
( c ) Assist in training of personnel;
( d ) Otherwise provide for the proper administration of Occupant Emergency Programs (as defined in § 102-71.20 of this chapter);
( e ) Solicit the assistance of the lessor in the establishment and implementation of plans in leased space; and
( f ) Assist the Occupant Emergency Organization (as defined in § 102-71.20 of this chapter) by providing technical personnel qualified in the operation of utility systems and protective equipment.
#### § 102-74.140 On what basis does the Administrator select construction and alteration projects?

The Administrator selects projects based on a continuing investigation and survey of the public building needs of the Federal Government. These projects must be equitably distributed throughout the United States, with due consideration given to each project's comparative urgency.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5318

To prohibit the exportation of Alaskan North Slope crude oil.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 2000

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on

Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit the exportation of Alaskan North Slope crude

oil.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EXPORTATION OF ALASKAN

4 NORTH SLOPE CRUDE OIL.

5 Effective 90 days after the date of the enactment of

6 this Act—

7 (1) no domestically produced crude oil trans8 ported by pipeline over right-of-way granted pursu9 ant to section 203 of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Au-
2

•HR 5318 IH

1 thorization Act (43 U.S.C. 1652) may be exported

2 from the United States, or any commonwealth, terri3 tory, or possession of the United States; and

4 (2) subsections (s) and (u) of section 28 of the

5 Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 185(s) and

6 (u)), and section 7(d) of the Export Administration

7 Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2406(d)), are repealed.

Æ
#### § 957.6 Filing documents for the record.

The parties shall file documents, permitted by the rules in this part or required by the Hearing Officer, in the Judicial Officer Department's electronic filing system. The website for electronic filing is *https://usps-judicialoffice.journaltech.com*. Documents submitted using that system are considered filed as of the date and time (Eastern Time) reflected in the system. Orders issued by the Hearing Officer shall be considered received by the parties on the date posted to the electronic filing system.

[80 FR 55767, Sept. 17, 2015, as amended by 89 FR 61021, July 30, 2024]
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Victor M. Perez, Chief Financial Officer of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc., certify that:     1. Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A-1 of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     *Date:July 21, 2006*By: */s/ Victor M. Perez*         *Victor M. Perez*    *Chief Financial Officer*
§ 102-74.40 What are concession services? Concession services are any food or snack services provided by a Randolph-Sheppard Act vendor, commercial contractor or nonprofit organization (see definition in § 102-71.20 of this chapter), in vending facilities such as— ( a ) Vending machines;
( b ) Sundry facilities;
( c ) Prepackaged facilities;
( d ) Snack bars; and
( e ) Cafeterias.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                               HINES HORTICULTURE

                           CERITIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Claudia
M. Pieropan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the4 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that Exhibit 99.2:

          (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirement section 13(a)
                    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)       The information contained In the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                    operations of the Company.


                                           By:      /S/ CLAUDIA M. PIEROPAN
                                                    -----------------------
                                                    Claudia M. Pieropan
                                                    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

April 11, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hines Horticulture, Inc. and will be retained by Hines Horticulture,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 101-29.211 Product description.

A *product description* is a description of a product for acquisition and management purposes. Product descriptions include specifications, standards, commercial item descriptions, purchase descriptions, and brand-name purchase descriptions.
Order entered December 6, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01281-CV

KENNETH W. MORRISON, RICK ADAMS, AND STONECOAT OF TEXAS, LLC,

Appellants

V.

JOHN D. PROFANCHIK, SR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-02057-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ December 5, 2018 unopposed motion to extend time to 

file reply brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 4, 

2019.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
§ 102-33.435 What CAS cost and utilization data must we report? You must report: ( a ) The costs and flying hours for each CAS aircraft you hire;
( b ) The costs and contractual periods for related aviation services that you hire (by contract or through an Inter-service support agreement (ISSA)).
Note to § 102-33.435 :
You should not report related aviation services that you hire commercially in support of Federal aircraft. “Federal” aircraft are by definition owned aircraft. The agency that owns the aircraft is responsible for capturing all cost and utilization data and is required to report this data in GSA's FAIRS. See the U.S. Government Aircraft Cost Accounting Guide (CAG), which is available from GSA at *http://www.gsa.gov/aviationpolicy*.
#### § 102-117.200 What is HAZMAT?

HAZMAT is a substance or material the Secretary of Transportation determines to be an unreasonable risk to health, safety and property when transported in commerce. Therefore, there are restrictions on transporting HAZMAT (49 U.S.C. 5103 *et seq.*).
#### § 102-36.140 May we arrange to have the excess personal property shipped to its final destination?

Yes, when the holding agency agrees to provide assistance in preparing the property for shipping. You may be required to pay the holding agency any direct costs in preparing the property for shipment. You must provide shipping instructions and the appropriate fund code for billing purposes on the SF 122.