Decem ber17,2022

Jam esH .Brady

2422ApplekidgeCircle

V anasquan,NJ 08736

H on.JudgeDonald M .M iddlebrooks

PaulG .RogerjFederalBuilding andU .S.Courthouse

701Clem atiyStreet I

Room 257

W estPalm Beach,Florida33401 :

Re:lndexN o.9:22-cv-81780PresidentD onald J Trump v.LetitiaJames

Re:FriendoftheCourtLetter

t

bearJudgeM iddlebrooks:

FILED BY çpt% D.C.

gc.g 'Lg.ntg?.2

ANGELA E.NOBLE

CLERF'NUS DISI CX

s..p,pqF'oss-w.RB.

l

Thereareanum berofveryim portantthingsthat1needtosharewiththisCourtin this

D ecem ber17,2022Friend oftheCourtletter.

First,lfeelitisvery im portantthattllisCourtaddressthefactthatM s. Jam esdidnot

disputeany ofthecrim inalconductthatlaccusedherofin my firstçFriend ofthe

Com4''lettertothisCoul'tdatedN ovem ber23,2022thatappearsonthedocketsheeton

NTovem ber28,2022 asdocketentry 8.

1

TheD ocketSheetsprovesthatM s.Jam essimply ignoredthecrim inalconductthatl

accused herofbecausesheknow shertwo crim esareindisputable,andbecauseher

practiceforyearshasbeento simply com pletely ignorem eandm y pleadsforhelp and

justiceforthetwocrimessheknows1wasthevictim ofbypowerfulpolitically

connectedpeople

By contrast,w ithin daysofM s.Jnm eshearingM r.Trum p'sform erlaw yerM ichael

Colm sayingduringsworn congressional testim ony thattheTrump Organization had

t&cookedthebooks,''M s.Jam esfiled acivilcom plaintagainsttheTrum p Organization

with imm ediatesubpoenadem andsand subsequentcrim inalreferralstotheM alzhat'tan

DistrictAttorneyandtheUnitedStatesAttorneyfortheSouthernDistrictofNew York.

lnmyfirstFriendoftheCourtletter,IincludedacopyofaNovember2,2022letterthat

1wrotetoM s.Jam esw hereitisproven that1accused M s.Jam esofcolluding inthe

i.

1

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 1 of 20
conspiracy and cover-up ofthe tw oproven crim esagainstm ethatforcedthesaleofm y

fam ilyeventspacebusinessSmdio450,andthatwipedoutmylifesavingsofover$2.3

m illion dollarson Septem ber5,2018.

lnthisFriendoftheCourtletter,1asktheCoul'ttotakejudicialnoticeofthefactthat1

recentlyfiled aD ecem ber3,2022 FriendoftheCourtletterin thecaseofTrump vThe

Unitedstateso.fAmerica(Docketnumber22-cv-81294,lndexNo.200).Forthis

Court'sconvenience,lam including acopy ofthat1l-pageD ecem ber3,2022Friendof

theCourtletterwithouttheattachedexhibits.(Exhibit1).

M yD ecem ber3,2022Friend oftheCourtletterprovesthatlneverw aiverandprove 1

wasm akingthe sam eargum entsandaccusationsofcollusion and cover-upthat1m ade

aboutN ew Y ork StateAttorney GeneralLetitiaJam esagainstU nited StatesAttorney

GeneralM errick B.GarlandandFB1directorCluistopherW ray.

Thecentralargum ent1m adeinm y Decem ber3,2022 lettertoJudgeCannon is

reproducedbelow and aretaken 9om pages1through4 ofthatletter.

D earJudgeCarmon:

M y friendoftheCourtletterprovesthat,attheexactsam etim eUnitedStates

AttomeyMr.MenickB.GarlmzdandFBIDirectorChristopherWrayaretrying

toprosecutèDonaldTlum p forpurportedly holding onto som eclasslfied

docum ents,M r.Garland andM r.W ray arethem selvesengaging in m uch m ore

seriouscrimesandcollusiontohelpotherpoliticallj-connectedbillionairesand

thestepson ofadifferentpolitically corm ectedbilllonairegetaw ayw ith blatantly

obviouscrim inalactivitiesagainstm eandm y fam ily.

Thesim plestand shortestw aytoexplainthecrim inalconductthatM .r.Garland

andM r.W ray arein collusionw ith others,isto simply reproducebelow the

October25,2022letterthatw asw ritten toM r.Garland,and also senttoM r.W ray

in addition to otherpublicofficials.

October25,2022

M enick B.G arland,Attorney General

950PennsylvaniaAvenue,

N W W ashington,D .C.20530-0001

Dear.M r.G arland:

2

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 2 of 20
Y ouhaveneverrepliedtoasingleoneofthem ultiplelettersthat1have

sentyou sinceJuly2022 where1nm showntoberepeatedlypleading for

justicefortwoprovencrimescommittedagainstmebypolitically

connectedbillionairesorthestep childofapolitically corm ectedm ulti

billionaire.

Thefirstcrim ethatyou havecontinuedtoignorecom pletely istheproven

and adm itted factthatJudgeJudy Sheindlin'sstepson Gregory Sheindlin

stoleover$1.7milliondollars9om meandforcedthesaleofmyfamily

businessStudio450 andlivelihoodby âaudulently representingtlzrough

timplicationonly''thattherewasajtuy tindingonaJtme26,2015Jury

interrogatory sheetthepersonalguarantees1signedw ith IGS Realtywere

enforceablewhen heknew,and adm ittedathisM ay 4,2021deposition,

thattheclaim wasatotallie.

Asyouknow bylisteningtohisMay4,2021Deposition(foundon

YouTube),MT.SheindlinadmittedthisfactathisM ay4,2021deposition

and alsothatm y defensesand cotmterclaim sw erenoteven on thetlzree

questionjtlryinterrogatorysheet,althoughinthetinancialjudgment,

Sheindlinwrotehealsosaidthoseitemswererejectedbythejuryonthe

courtfilingshewrotetostealover$1.7miliondollarsfrom meandmy

w ifeon September5,2018.

A syou know ,Sheindlin'sdepositiontestim ony also show sSheindlinbeing

caughtin aâaudschem ewhereatthesam eexacttim ehewasfraudulently

representingin 2018thattherew asaJuryfindingthatthepersonal

guaranteeswereenforceablethelandlordsotherattorney RobertFass,who

ran the2015trialadm ittedthrough courtfilingsin2018thatthetlzree

questionsontheJune26,2015jurysheet,saidnothingaboutpersonal

guarantees.A11thesefactsw erealready proventoo you whenyou heard

thesefactsadm itted9om Sheindlin'sown m outh athisM ay 4,2021

deposition.

Y ou havealready listenedtothesedepositionsandyetyourem ain silent.

Whyisthat?Iknowwhyitis.lt'sbecauseyouareincollusiontohelpthe

step son ofm ultibillionatreJudgeJudy Sheindlin getaw ayw ith hiscrim e.

A lso,itisbecauseyou havenoproblem rationalizingbeingtotally corrupt,

cruelandprejudiceagainstawhiteClzristianwhoyouknow istellingthe

truth aboutthecrim inaldestruction causedbyJudgeJudy'sstepson Gregory

Sheindlin.

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 3 of 20
Thesecond cl-im èthatyou arestillcom pletely ir oringisthefactthatyou

know thatpolitically conneçtedbillionairedevelopersandtheirpolitically

connectedlaw yersusedtheircontrolovertheN ew Y ork Statecourtsto

stealthe$70-90millionindevelopmentrightsthateveryoneknowswere

contractually appurtenanttom yform er12th FloorandRoofUnit

Apartm entin acom m ercialco-op nam ed450W est31StStreetOwnersCop

pursuanttom y offeringplan contractand certain wordsused in ahigher

AppellateDivision FirstD epartm entFebruary 11,2010 decision.

You havealready seen thatitisaproven factthatalow ercourtunlaw fully

rewroteacontractandhighercourtdecisionin an attempttovoidwhat

thesedocllm entssaid on theirface.Thefactthatthisunlawfulacttook

placeisshown againbelow :

TheSeventh Paragraph FootnotetotheScheduleofUnitsin theAm ended

1980OfferingPlan from 450W est31stStreetOwnersCorp readsas

follow s:

''SeventhParagraph-NEW-F/;c12thFloorandRoofUnitShall

have,inadditiontotheutilizationoftheroof therighttoconstruct

orextendstructuresontherooforabovethesame,totheextentthat

may#om timetotimebepermittedunderapplicableflw.,3

TheAppellateD ivision,FirstDepartm ent,February 11,2010Decision

endedw ith thefollowingw ords:

''Pursuanttoparagraph7,thatplaintp Jztzvctherighttoconstruct

orextendstructuresupontherooforabovethesametotheextent

thatmay#om timetotimebepermittedunderapplicableftzw,

unanimouslyJf/zrznc: withoutcosts.''

JusticeKornreich'sSuprem eCourtJuly 15,2014 Decisionrem itesthe

abovetoread:

.'Ithasalreadybeena4udgedthatwhiletheownersofthe

unitmayhavetherighttoerectadditionalstructuresontheroof that

rightdoesnotentitlethem touseanyjloorareaindoingso(Prior

Action,decisionand order,M ar13,2009at*2& amp;*4-*5

J'Wöfàfnghereinshallbeconstruedasholdingthatplàintp have

4

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 4 of 20
therïg/c/tousealloranypartoftheFD& inconnectionwithsuch

constructionorextension,)/Bradyv450/Fi31stSt.tlwncr'sCorp.,

70AD3d469,470J7-ç/Dept20107fholdingthattheoferingplan ''

reservesforplaintp theright...toconstructorextendstructures

ontheroofthatmaybebuiltwithouttheuseofthebuildingks

developmentrights.'7''

YoualsoknowthatthesameJudgethatunlawfullyrewroteacontractandhigher

courtdecisionforcedmetopayover$500,000.00lnlegalfeestothelawyersthat

usedtheirinfluenceoverthecourtstohaveJudgeKonzreichconductthiscrim inal

act.

N ow atthispointyouneedtostopm onkeyingaround and adm itthetruththatm y

k

conyactandM gherAppellateDivision,FirstDepartmentdecislondoesgovern

overthelowercourtdecision arldthatitisurllaw fulandunconstitutionaltoignore

thesedocllm entstohelppolitically corm ectedbillionairesandtheir1aw flrm sget

away withthecrim e.

Again,pleasestopyourprejudiceandcom ptionandaddressthesetwocrimes

thatarenotgoing away,nom atterhow m uchyou w ould liketocolludein helping

politically corm ectedbillionairesgetaway withtheircrim es.

Pleasecallmeat201-923-5511oremailmeatbradyny@gmail.com todressthese

m atters.

Sincerely,

Jam esH .Brady

N eitherM r.G arlandnorM r.W ray respondedtothisletterorany oftheotherletters1

sentthem becausethatw asw hatthey w eretodoasthei.rpartin theconspiracy tohelp

thepep etratorsgetaw ayw ith thçtwocrim esshow nintheletter.

N ew Y ork CityM ayorEl'icA dam s,New York StateAttorney GeneralLetitiaJam es,

U nited StatesAttorney fortheSouthernD istrictofN ew Y orkD am ianW illie s,and

M anhattan DistrictAttom ey AlvinBraggalsoreceivedtheexactsam eletterandgave

theexactsam eresponse,which w astocom pletely ignorem y pleadsforhelp from the

crim esproven in theletter.

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 5 of 20
M yN ovem ber23,2022 FriendoftheCourtlettertothisCourtincludedaN ovem ber2,

2022lettertoM s.Jam esthatgaveasum m ary ofherwrongdoing. Thefirstfew

paragraphsofm y N ovem ber2,2022 lettertoM s.LetitiaJam esareshown againbelow :

(dYouhavedeliberately com pletely ignored addressing twohonificcrim esthat

youknow tookplaceagàinstm eandm xw ifethatdestroyed ourfam ilybusiness

Studio450andwipedoutourlifesavingsofover$2.3milliondollarson

Septem ber5,2018.

tspeciscally,youknow thefirstadm itted crim ehw olved JudgeJudy Sheindlin's

stepson Gregory Shehzdlin who stipulatedunderoath athisM ay4,2021

depositionthattheJune26,2015 Juryinterrogatory sheetthatheandJudgeBarry

Ostragerrepresentedasthegroundstocollectover$1.7milliondollarsona

personalguaranteenevereven had aquestionpertailzing topersonalguaranteeson

theJune26,2015Juryinterrogatorysheet.(emphasisadded).JudgeOstrager

certainly knew noneofthetllreequestionsontheJune26,2015Jury sheetsaid

anythingaboutçpersonalguaranteesilsincehewasthepersonthatwrotethejury

sheetsthathekeptsecret9om Bradytillthetrialwasover.(emphasisadded).

tçYou alsoknow thatthesecondproven crim eisthefactthatlw asforcedtopay

over$500,000.00tothelawyersfortheNew YorkDeveloperswhostolethe$70-

90m illiön in airrightsthatw ereaffirm edtobecontractually appM enanttom y

form er12th floorandRoofU nitApartm entin acom m ercialapartm entnnm ed

450W est31stStreetOwnersCop .Youknow thattheongoingfraud schem ein

tlnisai.rrightscaseistoignorethefactthatmycontract(whichwasregisteredin

yourofficein1980)andthefinalhigherFebruary1l,2010AppellateDivision,

FirstD epartm entD ecision havealw aysgoverned overthefinallow erJuly 15,

2014 Suprem eCourtD ecision ofJudgeShirleyK onzreich.

tûY ou needto stop colludingin thesecrim esdescribedabovesinceno one,

includingyou,isabovethelaw .''

A review ofthelatestD ecem ber16,2022 filingsbytheLetitiaJam esintheCasebefore

tltisCoul't(docketnumber11)providesthebestproofthatthisCourtneedsto(&So

Order''thatM s.Jam çsexplain why attheexactsnm etim esheisdoingeverything she

cantotakedowntheTrum ps'andtheirfam ily businesssherefusestotaketheany

action whatsoever againsttheperpetratorsofthetwo crim esproven abovewhere

politically-connectedpeoplecollectivelystoleover$2.3milliondolarsfrom mepn

Septem ber5,2018in addition to adifferent N ew Y ork CityD evelopergetting away

withstealingthe$70-90millionindevelopmentrightsthateveryoneknowswere

6

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 6 of 20
affirmedtobecontractually appurtenanttom y form er12thFloorandRoofUnit

Apartm ent.

ltisnotacoincidencethatallthreeofthese1aw enforcem entofticialsandothersfollow

thesam eexactpracticeofcom pletely ignoring m eandcom pletely ignoreaddressingthe

crim esthatlhaveproventookplaceagainstm eandm y fam ily.

W hathappenedtom eissystem iccollusionbetw een ourinstim tionsand an

unconstitutionaltwo-tierjusticesystem wherelaw enforcementandjudgescolludeto

help peoplethey likeandtoharm peoplethey donotlike.1havebeenrepeatedly

censored,sanctionedandpersonally attackedw ith blatantly falseclaim sin theN ew

York StateandFederalCoul'tsforbeingbraveenough toexposetheircom zption onm y

websitewww.bullxiudgesny.com .

Fora1loftheabovereasons,1askthisCourttoE1So Order''thatM s.Jam esreply tothe

claim sofcrim inalwrongdoing that1m ade againsthertoseeifitistruethatattheexact

sam etim esheistryingtodestroytheTrum p'sandTrum p Organization,sheisherself

engagingincriminalconducttohelpotherpolitically-cormectedpeoglegetawaywith

horrificcrim esthatdestroyedm y life,livelihood,andthatstolem y llfe'ssavingsofover

$2.3milliondolars,and$70-90m illionindevelopm entrightsthatwereaffirm edtobe

contractually appurtenanttom y then 12thFloorand RoofUnitApartm ent.

l1

:canbereachedbyemailatBradyny@gmail.com or201-923-5511.

Thank You,

'

/

Jam esH .Brady

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 7 of 20
j '

EX H IB IT

1

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 8 of 20
Decem ber3,2022

Jam esH .Brady

2422A ppleRidgeCircle

M 4nasquan,N J08736

H on.A ileen M .Cannon

A ltoLeeAdam s,Sr.United StatesCourthouse

101South U .S.llighw ay 1

Cham bers4044

FortPierce,FL 34950

lndexNo.9:22-cv-81294,Trump v.UnitedStates(fAmerica

D earH on.JudgeCalmon:

Thisisagiend oftheCourtletterthatthat1am sureyouwillfmd very

helpfulin theabove-captionedcasebeforeyou.Pleasem akesurethatthis

giend oftheCourtletterisputon thedocketsheet.

M y friend oftheCourtletterprovesthat,attheexactsam etim eUnited

StatesAttorney M r.M enickB .Garland andFB1D irectorChristopher'W ray

are tryingtoprosecuteD onaldTnlm p forpurportedlyholding onto som e

classifieddocum ents,M r.GarlandandM r.W rayareihemselvesengagingin

muchmoreseriouscrimesandcollusiontohelgotherpolitically-cormected

billionairesandthestepson ofadifferent politlcally corm ectedbillionaire

.getaw ay w ithblatantly obviouscrim inalactivitiesagainstm eandm y

fam ily.

Thesim plestandshortestwaytoexplain thecrim inalconductthatM r.

GarlandandM r.W ray arein collusionw ithothers,isto simply reproduce

below theOctober25,2022letterthatwaswrittentoMr.Garland(Exhibit

1),atzdalsosenttoM r.W raylxhibit2)inadditiontootherpublicofficials.

October25,2022

M enickB.Garland,AttorneyG eneral

950Perm sylvaniaA venue,

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 9 of 20
N W W ashington,D .C.20530-0001

D ear.M r.Garland:

You haveneverrepliedtoasingleoneofthem ultiplelettersthatI

havesentyou sinceJuly 2022where1am showntoberepeatedly

pleadingforjusticefortwoprovencrimescommittedagainstmeby

politically cormectedbillionairesorthestep child ofapolitically

connectedm ultibillionaire.

Theflrstcrimethatyouhavecontinuedtoigqorecompletelyisthe

provenandadmittedfactthatJudgeJudyShelndlin'sstepsonGrekory

Sheindlinstoleover$1.7m illiondolars9om meandforcedthesale

ofm y fam ilybusinessStudio 450andlivelihoodby gaudulently

representingtlzrouglziEimplicationonly''thattherewasajuryfinding

onaJtm e26,2015Jury interrogatory sheetthepersonalguarantees

1signedwith1G SRealty wereenforceablewhen heknew ,and

adm itted athisM ay 4,2021deposition,thattheclaim wasatotallie.

Asyouknow bylisteningtolisM ay4,2021Deposition(foundon

YouTube),M r.SheindlinadmittedthisfactathisM ay4,2021

depositionandalsothatmydefensesandcounterclaimswerenoteven

onthethreequestionjurylnterogatorysheet,althoughinthefmancial

judgment,Sheindlinwrotehealsosaidthoseitemswererejeçtedby

thejuryonthecourtfilingshewrotetostealover$1.7miliondollars

9om m eandm yw ifeon Septem ber5,2018.

Asyouknow ,Sheindlin'sdepositiontestim ony also show sSheindlin

being caughtin afraud schem ewhereatthesam eexacttim ehewas

gaudulently representing in 2018thattherew asaJuryfm dingthatthe

personalguaranteesw ereenforceablethelandlordsotherattorney

RobertFass,whoranthe2015trialadmittedthroughcourtfilinjsin

2018thatthetlzreequestionsontheJune26,2015jurysheet,sald

nothing aboutpersonalguarantees.A llthesefactswerealready

proventooyouwhen youheardthesefactsadm ittedfrom Sheindlin's

ownm outh athisM ay 4,2021deposition.

Youhavealready listenedtothesedepositionsandyetyourem ain

silent.W hy isthat? lknow why itis.lt'sbecauseyou arein

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 10 of 20
collusiontohelp thestep son ofm ultibillionaireJudgeJudy Sheindlin

getaw ayw ithhiscrim e.A lso,itisbecauseyouhavenoproblem

rationalizingbeingtotallycorrupt,cruelandprejudiceagainstawlzite

Clzristian whoyou know istelling thetrtlth aboutthecrim inal

destruction causedby JudgeJudy'sstepson Gregory Sheindlin.

Thesecondcrim ethatyouarestillcompletelyir oringisthefactthat

youlm ow thatpolitically corm ected billionairedevelopersandtheir

Politicallyconnectedlawyersusedtheircontroloverthe#ewYork

Statecourtstostealthe$70-90millionindevelopm entrightsthat

everyoneknowswerecontractually appurtenantto my form er12*

FloorandRoofUnitApartm entin acom m ercialco-opnam ed450

W est31ststreetOwnersColqpursuanttomyofferingplancontract

andcertainwordsusedinahlgherAgpelateDivisionFirst

Departm entFebruary 11,2010 decislon.

Y ou havealready seenthatitisaproven factthatalowercourt

ulzlaw fullyrew roteaconkactandhighercourtdecision inan attem pt

tovoidwhatthesedocum entssaid on theirface.Thefactthatthis

unlaw fulacttook placeisshown again below :

TheSeventhParagraphFootnotetothe ScheduleofUrlitsinthe

Am ended 1980OfferingPlan 9om 450W est31stStreetOwnersCorp

readsasfollow s:

l

.êseventhParagraph-NEW-F/cc12thFloorandRoofUnit

Shallhave,inadditiontotheutilizationoftheroof therightto

constructorextendstructuresontherooforabovethesame,to

theextentthatmayk om timetotimebepermitedunder

applicable/Jw.''

TheAppellateDivision,FirstDepartm ent,February 11,2010

D ecision ended with thefollowing words:

''Pursuanttoparagraph7,thatplaintp havetherightto

constructorextendstructuresupontherooforabovethesame

totheextentthatmayfrom timetotimebepermittedunder

applicable/Jw,unanimouslyJf/zrnsctfwithoutcosts.''

JusticeK ornreich'sSuprem eC'ourtJuly 15,2014Decisionrewrites

theabovetoread:

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 11 of 20
'lthasalreadybeenaWudgedthatwhiletheownersofthe

unitmay havetherighttoerectadditionalstructuresonthe

roof thatrightdoesnotentitlethem touseanyfoorareain

doingso(PriorAction,decisionandorder,M ar13,2009at*2

&*4-*5f.'Nothinghereinshallbeconstruedasholding

thatplaintp àtzvctherighttousealloranypartoftheTDRS

inconnectionwithsuchconstructionorextension,7Brady

v450m 31stSt.Owncr'sCorp.,70AD3d469,470(1stDept

2010.1Iholdingthattheofferingplan T'rcycznzc.çs/t-vyp/tzjFz/r the

right...toconstructorextendstructuresontheroofthatzntz-p

bebuiltwithouttheuseofthebuildingksdevelopment

rights.'1''

You also know thatthesam eJudgethatunlawfully rew roteacontract

andhighercourtdecisionforcedmetopayover$500,000.00inlegal

feestothelaryersthatusedtheirinfluenceoverthecourtstohave

JudgeKolmrelch conducttlziscrim inalact.

N ow atthispointyou needtostop m onkeying aroundandadm itthe

truth thatm y contractandhigherAppellateDivision,FirstDepartinent

decision doesgovern overthelow ercourtdecision andthatitis

unlawfulandunconstitutionaltoignorethesedocllm entstohelp

politically connectedbillionairesandtheir1aw firm sgetaw ay w ith the

crim e.

Again,pleasestopyom prejudiceandcorruptionandaddressthese

twocrimesthatarenotgoinjaway,nomatterhow muchyouwould

liketo colludeinhelpingpolltically corm ected billionairesgetaw ay

withtheircrim es.

Pleasecallmeat201-923-5511oremailmeatbradyny@ gmail.com

todressthesem atters.

Sincerely,

Jam esH .Brady

4

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 12 of 20
N eitherM r.GarlandnorM r.W ray respondedtothisletterorany ofthe

otherletters1sentthem becausethatwaswhattheyw ereto do astheirpart

intheconspiracytohelp theperpetratorsgetawayw ith thetwocrim es

shown in theletter.

N ew Y ork CityM ayorEricA dam s,N ew York StateAttorney G eneral

LetitiaJam es,United StatesAttorney fortheSouthernD istrictofN ew Y ork

D am ianW illiam s,andM anhattan DistrictAttorney AlvinBraggalso

receivedtheexactsam eletterand gavetheexactsam eresponse,w hich w as

tocompletely ignorem ypleadsforhelp 9om thecrim esproven intheletter.

A1lfourpeoplelisted intheaboveparagraphareAfrican Am ericansin

powerandshamelesslytlzeytreatmenomorejustlyt11a11hoecertainwhites

treatedAfrican Am ericansduling theyearsofdiscrtm inationthatfollow ed

theirfreedom 9om slavery.Sham efully thesefourindividualsarefollowing

theirpredecessors'schem eofcom pletely ignoringevery singleoneofmy

pleasforhelp letters.

Theschem esincludecontinuingthepracticeofnotansw eringasingleletter

1w roteoverthecourseof15years,andnotagreeingto evertalk tom e,even

foronem inute. Andm ostimportantlytotheschem eofhelping politicallyconnected peoplegetaw ayw iththeircrim es,thesefourindividuals,likeM r.

Garland andM r.W ray,haverefusedtoperm itBrady to fileacrim inal

com plaint.Thisisin directviolation oftheFirstAm endm entwlzich

guaranteestherightsofindividualstoseekredress9om thegovernm entfor

grievances.

M r.Garland's,M r.W ray'sandtheothers,refusaltoeven respondtothe

m ultiplelettersm ittento them provethey'reintmison collusionto coverup

forthecrim esandprovesnoneofthem arefittobeacting asprosecutorsof

DonaldTrump oranyoneelse.

J

'

TojustifyraidingthehomeofDonaldTrump,Mr.Garlandsaiditwas

llbecausenooneisabovethelaw ''andthatçlallpeoplem ustbetreated

evenly tmderthelaw .''M y evidencein thisgiend ofthecourtletterproves

thatM r.Garlandisatotalgaudm akingtheseclqim sashehelpsother

politically-corm ectedpeopleofhissam eethnicgroup getaway with stealing

over$2.3m illiondollarsfrom acatholicfam ilyonSeptember5,2018in

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 13 of 20
addition tohelpingam an ofhisfaith nam ed Jefgey Katzfrom Shem ood

Equitiesgetawaywithstealingthe$70-90millionindevelopmentrights

thatw ereao rm edcontractually 4ppurtenant tomy form er12*Floorand

Rooftmitapartm entintheHudson Y ardsD istrictofM anhattan.

Mywebsitewww.bullyjudgesnv.com provesthiscrimetookplaceafter1

refusedtowaivemyrightsfor9eein2012sinceitwas$2.5millionless

tha11what1w asoffered by ExtellD evelopm entin 2008.Onthewebsiteis

show sm y wifeandlneversignedthew aiverform thatwasneededforM .r.

Katztohavethelegalrigh!topurchasetheairrightscontractually

appurtenantto ourform er12*FloorandRoofUnitApartm ent.

TheattachedOctober4,2022letter(Exhibit3)proves1providedflmed

evidencetoM r.Garland,M r.W ray and a11theotherprosecutorsm entioned

inthislettershowing Jeffery K atzontapein an interview with Crain'sNew

Yorkbrajgingaboutthe$120milliondollarprofithemadebyflippingthe

property m 2012.Theinterview provesM r.Katzdidnotm ention thatthe

propertyheflippedfor$120milliondollarsmorethenhepaidforthe1ot

includedthe 170,000 in airrightsthathepurchased9om 450 W est31st

StreetOwnersCorp.Thetransaction rem ained asecret sinceM .r.K atz

knew thetransaction wasunlaw fulbecauseheneverobtainedthesir ed

w aiverthatheneeded in orderforthetransactionto havecleartitle.Again,

theunsignedwaivercanbefoundonthewebsitewww.bullyiudgesny.com .

Theinterview thatM r.KatzgavetoCrain'sN ew York canbefotm don

Y ouTube

Finally,inthisfriendoftheCourtletter1wanttoproveM r.Trump isnot

wrongwhenhestatesthatStateand FederalJudgescan bevery political,

biased,colruptandworkincollusionw ithprosecutorsagainstlitigantsthey

donotlike.M y evidenceprovesconcussively thatbothprosecutorsand

Judgesrefusedto adm itthefa'ctthatm y contractand fm alAppellate

DivisionFirstD epartm entFebruary 11,2010Decisiongovern overthefinal

low ercourtJuly 15,2014 Suprem eCourtDecisionwrittenby JudgeSherly

K ornreich,whowasthewifeofoneofthedefendants1aw firm .

ln thethirdto lastparar aph ofm y October2,2022 lettertoM r.Garland,

M r.W ray,andtheotherprosecutors1writethefollow ing:

6

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 14 of 20
dN ow atthispointyou needto stop m onkeyingarotmd andadm itthe

truth thatm y conkactandhigherAppellateDivision flrstdepm m ent

decision doesgovern overthelow ercourtdecision andthatitis

tmlaw fulandunconstitutionalto ignorethesedocum entstohelp

politically colm ected billionairesandtheir1aw fil'm sgetawayw ith the

CriTne.''

M r.Gadand,M r.W ray andtheotherprosecutorsrefusedtosay which

decisiongovem sbecausetheyltnow thatmydecisiongoverns.Thisconduct

isstraightup RICO

Thisexactshnm efulrefusaltoadm itthet14:t11thatm y cqntractandfinal

highercourtdecision governshappenedintheN ew York StateandN ew

Y orkFederalCourts.

Exhibit4isaM ay4,2018letterN ew York StateChiefJudgeJanetDiFiore

andA ssociateCourtofAppealsJudgeM ichaelGarcia.Thelettershows

both werepressedto adm itthatthecontractandhighercourtdecision

govem ed.Butrefusedtoanswerthequestion becauseitcould only be

answ eredinm y favor.

.j '

1

1 Re:Bradvv.JefrevKatz.etal,lndexNo.654226/2013(Supreme'

CotutNY County).

Brak v.450West31stOwncr,<Corp.IndexNo.

157779/2014(SupremeCourt,(NY Cotmtyl.

DearChiefJusticeD iFioreandJusticeGarcia:

Thisletterisnotam otion.ltisadem andthatyoutw oaddressa

crim inalschem ethatisgoing on inyourCourt.lam addressingyou

both asform erprosecutors.Thçreisabigfraud schem etoreplacea

j Febrtlary11,2010AppelateDivision,FirstDepartmentdecision

! (Exhl.bitA)withaM arch14,2015decision9om thelowercourtof

JusticeKornreich(ExhibitB).

7

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 15 of 20
,

A

TheFebruary 11,2010AppellateDecision givesm etherighttobuild

structtlresthatcanbebuiltwithandwithouttheusageoftheprem ise's

developm entrights.Specitk ally,thedecision correctly statesthatthe

Co-op ownsthedevelopm entrights,which w asneverin dispute,but

thatpursuanttotheSeventhParagraph FootnotetotheScheduleof

Units,theprem isesairrightsareappurtenanttom yU nittotheextent

thatm ay 9om tim etotim ebeperm itted underapplicablelaw .

Thelowercourtdecision voidstherightsthecontractandhighercourt

decisionsaidlhave,andissues$400,000worthofsanctionsagqinst

me.1willnottoleratetlzisinjusticeandthefraudschemeinwhich

manyjudgeshaveattemptedtoreplacethehighercourtdecisionwith

thelow ercourtdecision. Ii . :

li A filinginjtmctionwasplacedonmeasacleayobstructionofjustice

J requiringmetoseekpermissionbeforeseekinganytypeofjudicial ,'

reliefinthestatecourts.lnthiscase,a1lIw asseeking wasa

declaration astowhich ofthesetwodecisionsgovem s,asthey cannot

: coexist.Attachedisacopyofthedenialofthatrequest(ExhibitC).

' Ineedyoutoreplytothisletterno laterthanM onday,M ay 14,2018, '

,

' statingthattheFebruary 11,2010 decision givesm y 12tbFloorapd

, RoofUnittherighttobuild structureson abovetheroofwith and

withouttheusageoftheprem ise'sdevelopm entrights.Y ou alsoneed

to stateby thatdate,theFebruary 11,2010 decision governs,and that

m yrightswereviolatedbytheunlawfulsaleoftheprem ise's

! devefopm entrights. '

( .

y

-

:' Filthy dirtyJanetD T ioreand filthy dt'rtyM ichaelGarciarefusedto answ er

!1.1 w itch decision govem sbecausethey wantedtohelp Jeffery Katzgetaway

;4 ' I w ith stealingthe70-90m illion in developm entrightsthatwereafflrmed i,

' .

appurtenanttom y form er12thFloorandRoofU nitApm m ent.

8

) '

I

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 16 of 20
Mywebsitebulyjudgesny.com provedM ichaelGarciaranoutofhis2016

confrm ation hearingw hen confrontedtoexplain whattheonesentencelong

afflrmedconkactprovision m eanttohim

, Exhibit5 isaletterdatedDecem ber21,2017showing thatFederal Judges,

inclusionFederalCourtofAppealsjudgesfortheSecondCircuitwew also

pressedto adm itthatm y contractand fm alFebruary 11,2010decision

govem edoverthe thefm allow ercourtJuly 15,2014 Suprem eCourt

decision.Thesefederaljudgesalsorefusedtoanswerthequestionbecause

theyknow itcouldonlyby answ eredinm y favor.

Therearetw ofinaldecisionsintheairrightscasesthatsaytwo

differentthings,andnooneiswillingtoanswerwhichdecision

governsbecauseitcanonlybeanswered in m y favor.Andnow 1am

askingthisCourtagaipSat-out:whiçhdedsiongoyem s,theAppellate

Division'sFebruaryli,2010decision(ExhibitA)whichincludes

wordsthatcan only beconstrued asgivingmy Unittherighttoutilize

a11perm issibledevelopm entrightsthatm ay 9om totim ebeperm itted

tmderapplicablelaw,orthelow ercourt'sJuly 15,2014 decision by

JusticeKromtech(ExhibitB)whichhasnoneoftheserightsand

ordersm etopayalmost$500,000totheattorneysandthepartieswho

stolemyl'ightsthrougphacoe ptcourtdedsion.Thetwodecisions

camzotco-existand tlzisCourtm ustansw erwhich onegovem s?

lfyourefuseto addressany oftheseissues,then lwantthisletter

construedasam otionforrecusalbecauseitw ouldproveyou aretmfst

toadjudicatethesecajesandshouldallow someoneçlsetomakethese

beterminationsratherthanfurtherdisvacin:theintegrityofthe

fedqralcoprts.

9

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 17 of 20
Because1wasbeingstonewalledbyandcouldfindnorelieforjusticefrom

theN YS CourtofAppealsortheSecondCircuitCourtofAppeals1decided

todosom ething different:

ln early 2018,lwrotetoN ew Y ork StateAdm inistrativeJudgeDeborah

Kaplan askingperm issionto fileam otion fordeclaratory reliefseeking a

declaration ofwhich decision govem s.1neededto ask forperm ission

becauselwassubjectedtoatilinginjtmctionthatonitsfacewasactually

implementedtohelppreventmefrom obtainingredressfrom JrfferyKatz

andtheothersthatstolethe70-90m illion in airrightsthàtwereaffirm ed

contracm ally appurtenanttomy form er12tbfloorandRoofUnitapartm ent

OnM arch 8,2018,N ew York StateAdm inistrativeJudgeD eborah K aplan

issued adecision denyingm y declaratoryreliefandinsteadisshown baslzing

m ew ith falseclaim sandexcusesforwhy 1w ould notbeperm ittedtohave

ajudgedeclam whichfinaldecisiongovemed (Exhibit6).

;1 TheseactsproveRICO betweenthejudgesandtheprosecutorsthatsupport

Trum psclaim sthatolzrinstitm ionsarehopelessly broken.Thefactthatthe

l m ediaisnotreportingontheproven atrocitiesthattheyknow 1w as

i subjectedtoprovesDonaldTrump'sclaim thatthemediaisreallyitfake

i

new s''. In truththem ediaarètraitorssincetheirrolein societyistohold

thoseinpow eraccountable,nothidethecrim esofthosewho sharetheir

anti-Am erican cpnduct.Sim ply put,a11citizensoftheUnited Statesw ould

expectthepressto exposethatJudgesareunlawfully andtm constitutionally

rem itingthecontractdescriptionsofApartm entstovoidwhatthecontracts

Say ontheirface.

Finally,in thisfriendoftheCourtletter1wanttosay som ethingaboutM r.

JackSmith.Mr.GarlandjusttheotherdayappointedMr.JackSmithtobe

SpecialCpunseltoinvestigateDbnaldTrum p.M r.G arlandspeaksofthe

factthatM r.Sm ithw orkedasalifelong prosecutorasagoodthingwhenm y

evidenceprovesitisnotagoodthing.Specifically,M .r.Sm ith'sresum e

statesthathew orkedforthe N ew York DistrictAttorney andforthePublic

10

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 18 of 20
IntegrityUnitoftheEastem DistrictofN ew York.Thosefactswould

terrorizem eif1w ereM r.Trum p.

lnthe14yearsthatlhavebeenyleadingforhelpfrom theseagencies,not

oncedidthey evenreply.Soon ltw illbe be 15years sinceJusticeM arcy

Friedm an firsttm lawfully rewrotem y offeringplancontractin herJuly 2,

2008Decision. Overtheyearslhavewritten overadozen tim estothe

MtpubliclntegjtyUnit''oftheSouthernDistrictofNewYorkandthe

anhattan DlstrictAttorney'sofsceandnotonesingletim edidtheyreply.

Thisabusiveandsham efulconductprovesnoone in theçtpubliclntegrity

Units''oftheseagencieshaveaspeckofintegrity.1am sureJackSmithisno

exception,so1caution theCourtabouthim inthisfriendofthecourtletter

1canbereachedbyemailatBradyny@gmail.com or201r923-5511.

ThankY ou,

h)

amesH .Brady

11

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 19 of 20
.-u Yu. A. x zeex'-.. a s!aj/ . .

USPOSTAGEPAID 1I R- IT . @

9.90 'oa'zri/2gi7n-,/:o%o$avaase-oi:M A'ju

i

PRIO R ITY M A IL@

0Lb4 iestricsionsapp.Iy).* .60 Oz k.

E

RDc na enaldesfinatiuns1 ''..

t''l'*

----- W *'''* '

5

EXPECTED DELIVERY'YAY: 12/20/22 à

'

.

reqylirqdo'

C028 ài SHIP onsseqthe

4 .

-r0: tf:j>s't. .

* 701cœ kktlss-r mitationsofqoverage,

1% WE.v:*t'S'''..:I-.tJALMBEACHFL33401-5101 , '%. ::.à' '

.-.

,.

:

i..

.

..f.

;y

.f;.tj:.v J,

'> usps TRACKING* # .

!

!

9505513839582351631799 i

iedulefreePackagePickup, ' ' + !.gcantheQRcodq. .

1% 3fms2. , x

j* ,. ,o4. i' ' t .'

.

'

,

.

11111111111111.1111.,1,1-1 n-.:z'

300001000014 EP14FMay2020 '

. .

' . OD:1:1/2x91/2 USPRCOM/PICKUP

FROM :

J nunq

%&A'/7J/53t)XLd//pzk*z

k

TO:

Nt)4c/'<(.. /-1f

& o

W t')1 C

ïz/,-s/-fDc,/?-q

L

*1

lZ

x

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 20 of 20