alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 334.1400 Pacific Ocean, at Barbers Point, Island of Oahu, Hawaii; restricted area.

(a) *The area.* That portion of the Pacific Ocean lying offshore of Oahu between Ewa Beach and Barbers Point, basically outlined as follows:

| Station | Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A (shoreline) | 21°18′06′′ | 158°04′24′′ |
| B | 21°17′00′′ | 158°03′30′′ |
| C | 21°15′00′′ | 158°03′18′′ |
| D | 21°15′36′′ | 158°01′06′′ |
| E (shoreline) | 21°18′30′′ | 158°02′00′′ |

(b) *The regulations.*

(1) Vessels shall not anchor within the area at any time.

(2) Dredging, dragging, seining, or other fishing operations which might foul underwater installations within the area are prohibited.

(3) Use of the restricted area for boating, fishing (except as prohibited in paragraph (b)(2) of this section) and other surface activities is authorized.

(4) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Officer in Charge, Fleet Area Control and Surveillance Facility, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-7625, and such agencies as he/she may designate.

(Sec. 3012, 70A Stat. 157; 10 U.S.C. 3012)

[36 FR 14186, July 31, 1971, as amended at 45 FR 57126, Aug. 27, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, and amended at 58 FR 53427, Oct. 15, 1993]
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Richard Johnson II) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Amended 

Consent to Join in these proceedings by Richard Johnson II.

Dated this 22nd day of September 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 215 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 3040.155 Review. The Commission shall review the request, the Postal Service reply, and any public comment to determine whether the proposed modification to the market dominant and competitive product lists complies with applicable statutory requirements and the Commission's rules, and whether the proposed modification is consistent with the position of the Postal Service as expressed in its reply. The Commission shall either: ( a ) Approve the request to modify the market dominant and competitive product lists, but only to the extent the modification is consistent with the position of the Postal Service;
( b ) Reject the request;
( c ) Institute further proceedings to consider the request to modify the market dominant and competitive product lists; or
( d ) Direct other action as the Commission may consider appropriate.
[72 FR 63698, Nov. 9, 2007. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 6, 2020

NO. 03-20-00133-CV

M. R. and F. M., Jr., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the decree of termination signed by the trial court on January 28, 2020.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s decree of termination. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s decree of termination. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Allis-Chalmers Energy
Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



DATE: AUGUST 17, 2005     BY: /S/ MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                              ----------------------------------
                              MUNAWAR H. HIDAYATALLAH
                              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


DATE: AUGUST 17, 2005     BY: /S/ VICTOR M. PEREZ
                              ----------------------------------
                              VICTOR M. PEREZ
                              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



                                       9
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5637

AN ACT

To provide that an amount available for fiscal year

2001 for the Department of Transportation shallbe available to reimburse certain costs incurredfor clean-up of former Coast Guard facilities atCape May, New Jersey, and to authorize theCoast Guard to transfer funds and authority fordemolition and removal of a structure at formerCoast Guard property in Traverse City, Michigan.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5637

AN ACT

To provide that an amount available for fiscal year 2001

for the Department of Transportation shall be available

to reimburse certain costs incurred for clean-up of former

Coast Guard facilities at Cape May, New Jersey, and

to authorize the Coast Guard to transfer funds and

authority for demolition and removal of a structure at

former Coast Guard property in Traverse City, Michigan.
2

•HR 5637 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COSTS OF CLEAN-UP OF CAPE MAY LIGHT4 HOUSE.

5 Of the funds made available in the Department of

6 Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

7 2001 for environmental compliance and restoration of

8 Coast Guard facilities, $100,000 shall be available to reim9 burse the owner of the former Coast Guard lighthouse fa10 cility at Cape May, New Jersey, for costs incurred for

11 clean-up of lead contaminated soil at that facility.

12 SEC. 2. DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF BUILDING AT

13 FORMER COAST GUARD PROPERTY IN TRA14 VERSE CITY, MICHIGAN.

15 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and sub16 ject to the availability of funds appropriated specifically

17 for the project, the Coast Guard is authorized to transfer

18 funds in an amount not to exceed $200,000 and project

19 management authority to the Traverse City Area Public

20 School District for the purposes of demolition and removal

21 of the structure commonly known as ‘‘Building 402’’ at

22 former Coast Guard property located in Traverse City,

23 Michigan, and associated site work. No such funds shall

24 be transferred until the Coast Guard receives a detailed,

25 fixed price estimate from the School District describing
3

•HR 5637 EH

1 the nature and cost of the work to be performed, and the

2 Coast Guard shall transfer only that amount of funds it

3 and the School District consider necessary to complete the

4 project.

Passed the House of Representatives December 4,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 102-118.325 Does establishing an agency Chief Financial Officer-approved transportation prepayment audit program change the responsibilities of the certifying officers?

No, in a prepayment audit program, the official certifying a transportation voucher is held liable for verifying transportation rates, freight classifications, and other information provided on a transportation billing instrument or transportation request undergoing a prepayment audit (31 U.S.C. 3528).
#### § 102-42.115 What must we do when the transferred gifts and decorations are no longer required for official use?

When transferred gifts and decorations are no longer required for official use, report these gifts and decorations to the GSA as excess property on a SF 120, including the original transfer order number or a copy of the original transfer order.
§ 102-72.25 What are the different types of delegations of authority? The basic types of GSA Delegations of Authority are— ( a ) Delegation of Leasing Authority;
( b ) Delegation of Real Property Management and Operation Authority;
( c ) Delegation of Individual Repair and Alteration Project Authority;
( d ) Delegation of Lease Management Authority (Contracting Office Representative Authority);
( e ) Delegation of Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) Authority;
( f ) Delegation of Real Property Disposal Authority;
( g ) Security Delegation of Authority; and
( h ) Utility Services Delegation of Authority.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

No. 13-1999 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellee, 

v. 

CHRISTIAN J. MORALES, 

Defendant, Appellant. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 The opinion of this Court issued on August 27, 2015 is amended 

as follows: 

 On page 18, line 20, change "17" to "17-a"
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  237,866<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       2,334,666
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,088,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,705,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                        933,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     622,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,705,846
<SALES>                                        141,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,071,616
<CGS>                                           84,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  819,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,791
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                110,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,347
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              ( 2,319 )
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.11
<FN>
<F1>THE VALUE FOR RECEIVABLES REPRESENTS THEIR AMOUNT NET OF THEIR ALLOWANCES.
<F2>AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET EXISTS IN THE REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130408 & (70) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 130408 

 COA: 257103 
 Wayne CC: 03-012254

D’JUAN GARRETT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The 

miscellaneous motion is GRANTED. 

p0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
steam

_ record - Re: ICR Deadline Extension Request - Bi g Rivers Electric Corporation

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

-----Mark Bertram <Mark.Bertram@bigrivers.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: Mark Bertram <Mark. Bertram@bigrivers.com> Date: 06/30/2010 03:13PM Subject: ICR Deadline Extension Request - Big Rivers Electric Corporation

Alicea

, From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: Mark Bertram <Mark.Bertram@bigrivers.com> Date: 7/2/2010 7:32 PM Sub j ect: Re: ICR Deadline Extension Request - Big Rivers Electric Corporation Pa g e 1 of 2

4/14/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C2E3EC7D

...Attached is a letter requesting a 60-d ay extension to the current ICR Ques tionnaire deadline for all Big Rivers facilities. It should be noted that HMP&L Station Two is owned by the City of Henderson, but operated by Big Rivers Electric Corporation.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Mark W. Bertram Environmental Supervisor

Big Rivers Electric Corporation 201 Third Street Henderson, Kentucky 42420 (270) 844-6176 (270) 869-7815 cell

The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the person or entity to which it is directly addressed or c opied. It may contain material of confidential and/or private nature. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any act ion in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is not allowed. If you receive this message and the inform ation contained therein by error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your/any storage medium.

[ attachment "ICR Extension Request.pdf" re moved by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] Pa g e 2 of 2

4/14/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C2E3EC7D

...
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT010-1220-AA]


Amendment to Notice of Closure of Public Land to Certain Uses in 
Yellowstone County, MT

ACTION: Notice; amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management published a document in the 
Federal Register of October 14, 1999, closing 765 acres of public land 
to the use of motorized vehicles and mechanized vehicles, the discharge 
of firearms, horseback riding, hang gliding, and rock climbing. This 
notice will amend the closure to the area known as Four Dances Natural 
Area (formerly known as the Sacrifice Cliff or the Larsen property) to 
include closure to the use of Blowguns or Bow & Arrow. This area is 
also closed to killing or any attempt to kill animals without a special 
permit.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Jaynes, 406-896-5013.

    Dated: June 14, 2000.
David Jaynes,
Assistant Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 00-15464 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15708]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors Finance Committee

TIME AND DATE: The Finance Committee of the Legal Services Corporation 
Board of Directors will meet on June 25, 2000. The meeting will begin 
at 1:00 p.m. and continue until the Committee concludes its agenda.

LOCATION: Radisson Plaza Hotel Minneapolis, 35 South 7th Street, 
Minneapolis, MN 55402.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
    1. Approval of agenda.
    2. Review of the Legal Services Corporation's Consolidated 
Operating Budget, Expenses, and Other Funds available through April 30, 
2000.
    3. Review the projected operating expenses for fiscal year 2000 
based on operating experience through March 31, 2000 and the required 
internal budgetary adjustments due to shifting priorities.
    4. Consider and act on the President's recommendations for 
consolidated operating budget reallocations.
    5. Report on internal budgetary adjustments by the President and 
Inspector General.
    6. Report on budgetary needs for Fiscal Year 2002.
    7. Consider and act on other business.
    8. Public comment.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, Vice President for 
Legal Affairs, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, at (202) 336-
8800.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Shannon Nicko Adaway, at (202) 336-8800.

    Dated: June 15, 2000.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel, and Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15708 Filed 6-16-00; 3:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-Q of Alcan Aluminum Limited for the quarter ended 30 June 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,271
<PP&E>                                          12,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,554
<BONDS>                                          1,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        160
<COMMON>                                         1,213
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,588
<SALES>                                          3,598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,676
<CGS>                                            2,864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    218
<INCOME-TAX>                                       103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       109
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48


</TABLE>
#### § 102-75.710 What responsibilities do landholding and disposal agencies have concerning properties used for providing replacement housing for persons who will be displaced by Federal or Federally assisted projects?

Both landholding and disposal agencies must cooperate, to the fullest extent possible, with Federal and State agency representatives in their inspection of the property and in furnishing information relating to the property.
to dismiss based on a challenge to the grand jury and the district court

denied that motion. Appellant has also filed a notice of appeal from the district court's order denying his motion to dismiss. That notice of appeal was inadvertently docketed as a separate matter in Docket No. 67235. We direct the clerk of this court to administratively close the appeal in Docket No. 67235. The parties shall disregard the order to show cause issued in Docket No. 67235 on January 27, 2015. The clerk of this court shall transfer to Docket No. 54019 all remaining documents filed or received in Docket No. 67235.

We agree that supplemental briefing and a supplemental appendix is warranted in Docket No. 54019 regarding the denial• of appellant's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we grant the motion. Appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve a supplemental opening brief that does not exceed 15 pages or 7,000 words and a supplemental appendix. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date the supplemental opening brief is filed to file and serve a supplemental answering brief that does not exceed 15 pages or 7,000 words. Appellant shall have 30 days from the date the supplemental answering brief is filed to file and serve a supplemental reply brief that does not exceed 8 pages or 3,500 words. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

It is so ORDERED. 

# Set_. , C.J.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2

(01 I947A aciDocc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 3 (01 1947A .4Zttto SMOVIZSTAM.PFDSVMJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61648-CIV-SINGHAL

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., 

GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, and GEICO CASUALTY 

CO.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TITAN WELLNESS CENTERS OF FORT MYERS, 

L.L.C., HOA H. NGUYEN, D.C., ISODIAGNOSTICS TESTING, INC., DAVID BARUCH, 

JOEL D. STEIN, D.O., P.A., and JOEL D. STEIN, 

D.O.,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiff’s stipulation of dismissal as to 

Defendants David Baruch and ISO-Diagnostics Testing, Inc. (DE [133]). The Court 

having reviewed the stipulation and the docket, and being otherwise advised in the 

premises, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

as to two Defendants, David Baruch and ISO Diagnostics Testing, Inc. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 13th day of 

October 2023.

Copies to counsel of record via CM/ECF

Case 0:22-cv-61648-AHS Document 134 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2023 Page 1 of 1