alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.3

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ITS Networks Inc.
(the  Company)  for  the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  Report), the
undersigned  President  Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each
hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  April  17,  2003


                                           /s/Gustavo  Gomez
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Gustavo  Gomez
                                              President  and  Treasurer,  and
                                              principal financial and accounting
                                              officer
#### § 101-30.101-14 Maintenance action.

*Maintenance action* means any action taken after conversion to the Federal Catalog System which changes the previously reported identification or management data regarding a cataloged item.

[46 FR 35645, July 10, 1981]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               APR-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                            22,618
<SECURITIES>                                       6,503
<RECEIVABLES>                                     43,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       90,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 173,398
<PP&E>                                           138,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   348,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             96,256
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              46
<OTHER-SE>                                        78,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     348,706
<SALES>                                          102,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 103,466
<CGS>                                             73,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    103,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (41)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         984
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .28



</TABLE>
·i 

REGISTRATION NOT TRANSFERABLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I This certificate 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION- FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION must be in the airCERTIFICATE OF AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION craft when operated. 

NATIONALITY AND I AIRCRAFT SERIAL NO. 

REGISTRATION MARKS N 588ZR P76DCD2201 0362 

MANUFACTURER AND MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF AIRCRAFT 

DJI PHANTOM 3 PROFESSION 

ICAO Aircraft Address Code: 5 i 71 2 7 57 

This certificate is 

issued for 

1 ROSENTHAL STEPHEN W registration purposes 

S 64 ROYCROFT BLVD only and is not a 

S AMHERST NY 14226-4527 certificateoftiUe. 

U The Federal Aviation 

E Administration does 

D not determine rights 

of ownership as 

T between private 

0 ~pe_rson ___ s_. ______ __ 

Individual 0 

It is certified that the above described aircraft has been entered on the register of the Federal 

Aviation Administration, United· States of America, in accordance with the Convention on 

International Civil Aviation dated December 7, 1944, and with TIUe 49, United States Code, 

and regulations issued thereunder. · U.S. Department I 

1 "' . . of Transportation 1 DATEOFISSUE August 21,2015 · ~~_.) .fede.ral.AitiatioG--.· 

EXPIRATION DATE August 31, 2018 ADMINIST~Eia: ~ifirlliiiStf&tfon ·-·· AC Form 805G-3 (1ot'2010) Supenedes previous ecitions
§ 105-1.101-50 Exclusions. ( a ) Certain GSA property management and related policies and procedures which come within the scope of this chapter 105 nevertheless may be excluded therefrom when there is justification. These exclusions may include the following categories: ( 1 ) Subject matter that bears a security classification;
( 2 ) Policies and procedures that are expected to be effective for a period of less than 6 months;
( 3 ) Policies and procedures that are effective on an experimental basis for a reasonable period;
( 4 ) Policies and procedures pertaining to other functions of GSA as well as property management functions and there is need to make the issuance available simultaneously to all GSA employees involved; and
( 5 ) Where speed of issuance is essential, numerous changes are required in chapter 105, and all necessary changes cannot be made promptly.
( b ) Property management policies and procedures issued in other than the FPMR system format under paragraphs (a)(4) and (5) of this section, shall be codified into chapter 105 at the earliest practicable date, but in any event not later than 6 months from date of issuance.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40423 Summary Calendar

BERTRAND BROWN; ET AL

Plaintiffs BERTRAND BROWN Plaintiff - Appellant

v. JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION

Defendant - Appellee

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:95-CV-428

-------------------- July 18, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Bertrand Brown, Texas state prisoner #296134, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint without prejudice. He argues that the district court erred by dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice based merely upon the number of defendants named and claims raised in the suit and that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. We haveNo. 99-40423 -2- reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Brown has not shown that the district court erred by dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice, and he has shown no exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of counsel. See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). Finally, because Brown has not adequately briefed his claims that the district court erred by ordering him to pay a $26.97 initial partial filing fee and by denying his motion for a temporary restraining order, these claims are deemed abandoned on appeal and are therefore not considered by this court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems (1190).                    

*Date and Time:*                         July 20, 2000; 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Room 320; National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Geoffrey Prentice, Program Director, Kinetics, Catalysis & Molecular Processes, Division of Chemical and Transport Systems, Room 525, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1371.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate XYZ on a Chip Grants as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposal being reviewed includes information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data; such as salaries, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

# Note:

Closed portions are proper under Sunshine Act exemptions cited. The CMO's signature on this Notice is the required determination.

Dated: June 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-15229  Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000004187
<NAME> INDUSTRIAL SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,398,332
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,664,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                   212,650
<INVENTORY>                                  2,580,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,861,888
<PP&E>                                       9,158,480
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,961,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,445,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,280,860
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,575
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,982,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,445,237
<SALES>                                     19,827,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,827,773
<CGS>                                       18,198,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,198,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,399,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                194,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            137,271
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   137,271
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
§ 3030.261 Contents of a rate adjustment filing. ( a ) Each exigent request shall include the items specified in paragraphs (b) through (i) of this section.
( b ) A schedule of the planned rates.
( c ) Calculations quantifying the increase for each affected product and class.
( d ) A full discussion of the extraordinary or exceptional circumstances giving rise to the request, and a complete explanation of how both the requested overall increase and the specific rate adjustments requested relate to those circumstances.
( e ) A full discussion of why the requested rate adjustments are necessary to enable the Postal Service, under best practices of honest, efficient, and economical management, to maintain and continue the development of postal services of the kind and quality adapted to the needs of the United States.
( f ) A full discussion of why the requested rate adjustments are reasonable and equitable as among types of users of market dominant products.
( g ) An explanation of when, or under what circumstances, the Postal Service expects to be able to rescind the exigent rate adjustments in whole or in part.
( h ) An analysis of the circumstances giving rise to the exigent request, which should, if applicable, include a discussion of whether the circumstances were foreseeable or could have been avoided by reasonable prior action.
( i ) Such other information as the Postal Service believes will assist the Commission in issuing a timely determination of whether the requested rate adjustments are consistent with applicable statutory policies.
Original

No. 79-098

#### Janet Bagonzi v. Gary Miller, Director Division of Mental Health

May 17, 1979

*Wiggin & Nourie,*of Manchester *(William S. Orcutt*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Thomas D. Rath,*attorney general *(Wilbur A. Glahn, III,*assistant attorney general, orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

On March 2, 1979, the Grafton County Probate Court *(Frederick J. Harrigan,*Acting Judge), pursuant to RSA 464:4, appointed John A. Bagonzi, of Haverhill, temporary guardian for plaintiff Janet Bagonzi, *370for a period of sixty days. The court further ordered that the guardian was empowered to obtain admission of the ward to the New Hampshire Hospital.

The plaintiff was admitted to the New Hampshire Hospital on March 2, 1979, and has been confined there ever since. She did not have counsel at the time of the March 2, 1979, order. She was not afforded the right to obtain counsel, nor was she afforded a hearing. A guardian ad litem was appointed for her on March 8, 1979, six days after she was admitted to the hospital.

On March 8, 1979, the Grafton County Probate Court ordered that two doctors conduct an inquisition in accordance with RSA ch. 464. The inquisition was scheduled for April 2, 1979. The inquisition was adjourned before any findings were made because both inquisitors indicated that, because they knew the plaintiff, they could not act as independent and unbiased inquisitors. On April 19, 1979, a hearing was held in chambers before the Grafton County Probate Court. During the hearing, the court indicated that it would, over the objection of plaintiff’s counsel, appoint two new inquisitors. In a letter from the register of probate dated April 25, 1979, plaintiff’s counsel was advised that two new inquisitors had been named and a hearing on the inquisition would be held on June 7, 1979.

On April 25, 1979, the probate court decreed that “Temporary guardianship of John Bagonzi over Janet Bagonzi is continued beyond expiration date thereof until such date as hearing shall be held and decision rendered on inquisition petition brought by said guardian and presently pending.” The order continuing the temporary guardianship beyond its expiration date is not authorized by RSA 464:4, which provides that a temporary guardian may be appointed for a specified period “ not to exceed sixty days.” Those who are interested in the plaintiff’s welfare have procedures available under RSA ch. 135-B to protect both the interests of the plaintiff and society.

*Petition for writ of habeas corpus granted.*

Grimes, J., did not sit.
#### § 102-36.170 May we transfer personal property owned by one of our non-appropriated fund activities?

Property purchased by a non-appropriated fund activity is not federal property. A non-appropriated fund activity has the option of making its privately owned personal property available for transfer to a federal agency, usually with reimbursement. If such reimbursable personal property is not transferred to another federal agency, it may be offered for sale. Such property is not available for donation.

[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 33778, May 25, 2000]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TREX MEDICAL
CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 2, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                  8,075
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           52,675
<ALLOWANCES>                            3,538
<INVENTORY>                             58,112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        146,167
<PP&E>                                  29,154
<DEPRECIATION>                          13,262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          277,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   71,889
<BONDS>                                 177
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                341
<OTHER-SE>                              203,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            277,027
<SALES>                                 241,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        241,604
<CGS>                                   169,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           169,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        42,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        2,220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (39,909)
<INCOME-TAX>                            (11,978)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (28,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (28,069)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.87)


</TABLE>
#### JOHN STELLWAGEN, Respondent, *v.*THE MERCHANTS’ LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

*Application for insurance*— *signature of applicant.*

An application for insurance may, in the absence of any positive regulation of the company defining the circumstances under which the applicant is excused from personally signing it, be signed by a duly authorized agent of the applicant, or in any way by which he will be bound in fact as well as in law by the contents thereof.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

*655
      *E. Q. Sprague,*for appellant. *Delaman F. Clark,*for respondent.

Opinion by

Mullin, P. J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Gilbert, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
What is [INSERT COMMISION NAME]?

[Insert State Service Commission Details]

[Grantee/sponsor selects the standard language for the program(s) in their geographic area and supplements with information about their own projects.]

Learn more and get started:

[Grantee website and/or contact information]

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png
Cotton Ginning Cost Share

Farm Service Agency

CGCS PROGRAM

Overview

The Cotton Ginning Cost Share (CGCS) program 

provides cost share assistance payments to cotton 

producers with a share in the 2016 cotton crop. The 

CGCS program was established under the statutory 

authority of the Commodity Credit Corporation 

Charter Act and under the administration of the U.S. 

Department of Agriculture (USDA) Farm Service 

Agency (FSA).

The signup period for the CGCS program is March 12, 

2018, through May 11, 2018.

The CGCS program is a cost share program that 

provides cotton producers with cost share payments to 

offset their 2016 cotton ginning costs and assist with 

the marketing of cotton.

1

FACT SHEET

March 2018

Through the CGCS program, eligible producers can 

receive a one-time cost share payment, which is based 

on a producer’s 2016 cotton acres reported to FSA 

multiplied by 20 percent of the average ginning cost 

for each production region. The 20 percent rates are 

the following:

 $23.21 for the Southeast (AL, FL, GA, NC, SC, VA)

 $30.39 for the Mid-South (AR, IL, KY, LA, MS,

 MO, TN)

 $19.65 for the Southwest (KS, OK, TX) and

 $48.02 for the West (AZ, CA, NM)

For example, a Texas cotton producer who reported 

100 acres planted to cotton and has a 100 percent stake 

in the production, would receive a CGCS program cost 

share payment of $1,965.

All CGCS program cost share payments are based on 

the acreage report filed at the local FSA service center.

CALCULATION

acres x share x cost share rate

CGCS Program Cost Share Payment =
2 USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

COTTON GINNING COST SHARE PROGRAM FACT SHEET - MARCH 2018

Limitations

The CGCS program only applies to producers who 

have an interest/share in 2016 cotton acres, as reported 

to FSA county offices on form FSA-578. Cost share 

payments are capped at $40,000 per person or legal 

entity. CGCS program payments are its own separate 

payment limitation and do not count against other 

2014 Farm Bill payment limitations.

Eligibility

To be eligible for a CGCS program payment, each 

applicant is required to be a person or legal entity who 

was actively engaged in farming in 2016 and who 

complies with requirements including, but not limited 

to, those pertaining to highly erodible land 

conservation and wetland conservation provisions, 

commonly referred to as the conservation compliance 

provisions.

A producer’s average adjusted gross income may not 

exceed $900,000.

Apply for Cost Share

Producers who reported their 2016 cotton acreage to 

FSA will receive a prefilled CGCS application in the 

mail, which is to be signed and returned to the 

recording office listed on the form. CGCS applications 

can be submitted to your local FSA office either in 

person, by FAX or by email.

For More Information

This fact sheet is provided for informational purposes; 

other restrictions may apply. For more information 

about the CGCS program, visit 

www.fsa.usda.gov/pricesupport or contact your 

local FSA office. To find your local FSA office, visit 

http://offices.usda.gov.