alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         611,616
<SECURITIES>                                   100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,298,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                    214,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,265,447
<PP&E>                                       2,627,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                 785,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,229,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,513,488
<BONDS>                                         35,128
<COMMON>                                        17,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,595,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,229,534
<SALES>                                     22,491,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,667,974
<CGS>                                       17,898,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,965,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,779,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                984,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                   435,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            549,481
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   549,481
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Telematics Suppliers Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 3, 1999, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Telematics Suppliers 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; and LoJack Corporation, 
Dedham, MA have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Telematics Suppliers Consortium, 
Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all 
changes in membership.
    On March 12, 1999, Telematics Suppliers Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The last 
notification was filed with the Department on August 19, 1999. A notice 
has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-15602 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

COTY RANDOLPH PAULK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-3682

November 22, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Lon Arend, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maura J. Kiefer, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William C. Shelhart,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-14058-CR-CANNON/MAYNARD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOMINIC ANDRE ELVIR,

Defendant. /

GOVERNMENT’S EXHIBIT 1

Case 2:22-cr-14058-AMC Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2023 Page 1 of 9
USA_000258

Case 2:22-cr-14058-AMC Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2023 Page 2 of 9
USA_000259

Case 2:22-cr-14058-AMC Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2023 Page 3 of 9
USA_000260

Case 2:22-cr-14058-AMC Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2023 Page 4 of 9
USA_000261

Case 2:22-cr-14058-AMC Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2023 Page 5 of 9
USA_000262

Case 2:22-cr-14058-AMC Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2023 Page 6 of 9
USA_000263

Case 2:22-cr-14058-AMC Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2023 Page 7 of 9
USA_000264

Case 2:22-cr-14058-AMC Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2023 Page 8 of 9
USA_000265

Case 2:22-cr-14058-AMC Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2023 Page 9 of 9
#### § 102-75.380 May power transmission lines and rights-of-way be disposed of in other ways?

Yes, power transmission lines and rights-of-way not disposed of by sale for fair market value may be disposed of following other applicable provisions of this part, including, if appropriate, reclassification by the disposal agency.
§ 102-35.15 What are the goals of GSA's personal property regulations? The goals of GSA's personal property regulations are to: ( a ) Improve the identification and reporting of excess personal property;
( b ) Maximize the use of excess property as the first source of supply to minimize expenditures for the purchase of new property, when practicable; Note to § 102-35.15 ( b
):
If there are competing requests among Federal agencies for excess property, preference will be given to agencies where the transfer will avoid a new Federal procurement. A transfer to an agency where the agency will provide the property to a non-Federal entity for the non-Federal entity's use will be secondary to Federal use.
( c ) Achieve maximum public benefit from the use of Government property through the donation of surplus personal property to State and local public agencies and other eligible non-Federal recipients;
( d ) Obtain the optimum monetary return to the Government for surplus personal property sold and personal property sold under the exchange/sale authority; and
( e ) Reduce management and inventory costs by appropriate use of the abandonment/destruction authority to dispose of unneeded personal property that has no commercial value or for which the estimated cost of continued care and handling would exceed the estimated sales proceeds (see FMR §§ 102-36.305 through 102-36.330).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                          NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                                    THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED  THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
                                    ---------------------  ----------------------
                                    March 1,    March 2,   March 1,    March 2,
                                      2003        2002       2003        2002
                                    ---------  ----------  ---------  ----------
<S>                                 <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Net income (loss) for computing
  income (loss) per common share    $  16,204  $ (74,444)  $   6,439  $(253,893)
                                    =========  ==========  =========  ==========

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding
  during each period                  818,290    826,403     818,655    826,247
                                    =========  ==========  =========  ==========

Net income (loss) per common share  $   0.020  $  (0.090)  $   0.008  $  (0.307)
                                    =========  ==========  =========  ==========
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
#### § 102-75.345 What is different about the statements in the offer to purchase and conveyance document if the sale is to a potentially responsible party with respect to the hazardous substance activity?

In the case where the purchaser or grantee is a potentially responsible party (PRP) with respect to hazardous substance activity on the property under consideration, the United States is no longer under a general obligation to certify that the property has been successfully remediated, or to commit to return to the property to address contamination that is discovered in the future. Therefore, the statements of responsibility and commitments on behalf of the United States referenced in § 102-75.340 should not be used. Instead, language should be included in the offer to purchase and conveyance document that is consistent with any agreement that has been reached between the landholding agency and the PRP with regard to prior hazardous substance activity.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 22-23702-CIV-WILLIAMS/REID

SANDRA BRIDGES, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., 

Defendant. 

/ 

STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER FOR 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE LISETTE M. REID

The following discovery procedures apply to all civil cases assigned to United States 

Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. If the parties are unable to resolve their discovery disputes 

without Court intervention, Judge Reid will set the matter for hearing without the need for filing a 

motion. 

The moving party must seek relief within fifteen (15) days after the occurrence of the 

grounds for relief by contacting Judge Reid’s Chambers and requesting a hearing. Judge Reid’s 

telephone number is (305) 523-5780 and her Chambers are located at 301 N. Miami Avenue, 3rd 

Floor, Miami, Florida 33128. 

Once a hearing date is obtained, the movant shall provide notice to all relevant parties by 

filing a Notice of Hearing. The Notice of Hearing shall briefly specify the substance of the 

discovery matter to be heard and include a certification that the parties have complied with the 

pre-filing conference required by Southern District of Florida Local Rule 7.1(a)(3). 

Case 1:22-cv-23702-KMW Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

No written discovery motions, including motions to compel and motions for protective 

order, shall be filed unless requested by Judge Reid. It is the intent of this procedure to minimize 

the necessity of motions. 

The Court expects all parties to act courteously and professionally in the resolution of their 

discovery disputes and to confer in an attempt to resolve the discovery issue prior to requesting 

the hearing. Personal conferral, in person or by phone, is required unless the opposing party or 

counsel refuses to confer, in which case the moving party should advise the Court in the motion 

of such good faith efforts to confer and the opposing party or counsel’s refusal. The Court may 

impose sanctions, monetary or otherwise, if the Court determines discovery is being improperly 

sought or is not being provided in good faith. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 15th day of November 2022. 

LISETTE M. REID

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23702-KMW Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-75.65 Why is it important for Executive agencies to notify the disposal agency of its real property needs?

It is important that each Executive agency notify the disposal agency of its real property needs to determine whether the excess or surplus property of another agency is available that would meet its need and prevent the unnecessary purchase or lease of real property.
#### § 102-74.365 To whom does this subpart apply?

The rules in this subpart apply to all property under the authority of GSA and to all persons entering in or on such property. Each occupant agency shall be responsible for the observance of these rules and regulations. Federal agencies must post the notice in the Appendix to this part at each public entrance to each Federal facility.
EXHIBIT 31.2



Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION



I, Brian Maloy, certify that:



1.            I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended December 31, 2006 of Sento Corporation;



2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.            Based on my knowledge, the Financial Statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.            The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)           designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)            disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.            The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)            all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 20, 2007





| |                         | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| | /s/ BRIAN MALOY         | 
| | Brian Maloy            
| | Chief Financial Officer
#### RUSSELL SUNDERLIN, Respondent, v. JOHN A. WYMAN, Appellant.

*Chattel mortgage*— *certified copy of*— admissible *as evidence of the date of filing, but not of the existence and execution of the mortgage.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

The action was brought for-the conversion of two pairs of horses and two single horses, of which plaintiff claimed to be the owner.

The plaintiff claimed title by virtue of a sale under a chattel mortgage, and the defendant, by a sale under an execution upon a judgment recovered against the owner.

Upon the trial, the plaintiff gave in evidence a copy of the chattel mortgage, certified by the register of the city of New York, in whose office the original was filed.

With reference to this, the court at General Term said: “ On the trial, the plaintiff offered in evidence a copy of said mortgage, duly certified by the register of New York, in whose office the original was filed, together with the certificate of the clerk of the city and county of New York, that the officer taking the acknowledgment of said mortgage was a notary public of said city, duly commissioned and sworn.

The defendant’s counsel objected to the certificate of the register, that it was not evidence of the time of filing. The objection was overruled, and defendant’s counsel excepted.

The register is not presumed to know that the paper he found on file was the original mortgage. He could certify only that a paper, describing it by its number, or the names of parties, etc., was on file, and the time of filing entered thereon.

*494A copy of a mortgage certified by tbe officer in whose office it is filed, does not prove tbe existence and execution of tbe original mortgage. *(Rissell*v. *Pea/ree,*28 N. Y., 252.)

Tbe original must be produced, and when produced, tbe time of fibng, if it was filed, will be proved. If a copy only was filed, a duly certified copy of tbe copy, with tbe time of filing noted thereon, will prove tbe filing of sixcb copy.

“ Tbe defendant’s counsel did not object that tbe original was not produced. He must be held, therefore, to have accepted tbe certified copy in lieu thereof, and tbe time of fifing tbe copy was, therefore, proved. He cannot, on tbe argument of tbe appeal, insist upon any objection not taken at tbe trial, unless it be one that could not have been obviated bad it been raised. Tbe objection that tbe certificate does not, in terms, set forth that tbe original mortgage was filed, and that tbe paper produced is not proof of tbe execution and fifing of tbe mortgage, might have been obviated bad they been raised.”

*p[. 0. Kmgsbury,*for tbe appellant. *Morris <&*Russel, for tbe respondent.

Opinion by

Mullin, P. J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Talcott and Smith, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allied Research Corporation
("Allied") on Form 10-Q of the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the
undersigned, J. H. Binford Peay, III as President and Charles A. Hasper as Chief
Financial Officer of Allied, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the consolidated financial condition and result of
     operations of Allied.


                 /s/                                        /s/
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
         Charles A. Hasper                        J. H. Binford Peay, III
      Chief Financial Officer                          President

August 14, 2002                            August 14, 2002
#### § 958.22 Continuances and extensions.

Continuances and extensions may be granted under these rules for good cause shown.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 29, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32223-32224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12711]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2012-0821; 9817-5]

Oklahoma: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Oklahoma has applied to EPA for Final 
authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant 
Final authorization to the State of Oklahoma.

[[Page 32224]]

In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA 
is authorizing the changes by an immediate final rule. EPA did not make 
a proposal prior to the direct final rule because we believe this 
action is not controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. 
We have explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to 
the direct final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
authorization during the comment period, the direct final rule will 
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose 
this action, we will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not 
take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final 
rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for 
comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this 
time.

DATES: Send your written comments by June 28, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the 
materials submitted by the State of Oklahoma during normal business 
hours at the following locations: EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, phone number (214) 665-8533; or Oklahoma 
Department of Environmental Quality, 707 North Robinson, Oklahoma City, 
Oklahoma 73101-1677, (405) 702-7180. Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please follow the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule 
which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
immediate final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section 
of this Federal Register.

    Dated: May 2, 2013.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2013-12711 Filed 5-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                            HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                           Certified Public Accountant
                                 (216) 491-0800
                               FAX (216) 491-0803




October 29, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., Certified Public Accountant, consents to
the inclusion of its report dated October 29, 2001 on the Financial Statements
of AuGRID of Nevada, Inc. (the "Company") included in Amendment No. 2 to the
Company's report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.

Respectfully,

/s/ Henry L. Creel

Henry L. Creel, CPA

















                    3587 LEE ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44120