alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE No.: 22-cv-23734-KMW

WINDY LUCIUS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

HAPPY CORNER HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC.,

d/b/a Motek Mediterranean Restaurant & Café

Defendants. 

__________________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

COMES NOW Plaintiff, WINDY LUCIUS, by and through the undersigned counsel, 

pursuant to Rule 41(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., hereby gives notice that she voluntarily dismisses this 

action with prejudice against, Defendants, HAPPY CORNER HOSPITALITY GROUP LLC.,

d/b/a Motek Mediterranean Restaurant & Café., and respectfully requests this Court to terminate 

the action.

Respectfully submitted this December 13, 2022. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23734-KMW Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2022 Page 1 of 2
Lucius v. Happy Corner Hospitality 

Case No. 22-cv-23734-KMW

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 13, 2022, an electronic copy of the foregoing 

document was filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notice of 

electronic filing to all parties and Counsel of record. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23734-KMW Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2022 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

Case No.: 9:22cv81868

MARK ROSEMAN, 

An Individual,

Plaintiff,

v.

WPB F AUTOMOTIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC. 

A Florida Limited Liability Company,

Defendant.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES 

AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Plaintiff, MARK ROSEMAN, (“Plaintiff”) files this Certificate of Interested 

Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement under Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, and states:

1. The name of each person, attorney, association of persons, firm, law firm, 

partnership, and corporation that has or may have an interest in the outcome 

of this action – including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent 

corporations, publicly-traded companies that own 10% or more of a party’s 

stock, and all other identifiable legal entities related to any party in the case:

a. MARK ROSEMAN - Plaintiff

b. JOSHUA FEYGIN, PLLC. - Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 9:22-cv-81868-XXXX Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2022 Page 1 of 3
c. JOSHUA FEYGIN, ESQ. - Counsel for Plaintiff

d. WPB F AUTOMOTIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC – Defendant

2. The name of every other entity whose publicly-traded stock, equity, or debt 

may be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceedings:

a. None.

3. The name of every other entity which is likely to be an active participant in 

the proceedings, including the debtor and members of the creditors’ 

committee (or twenty largest unsecured creditors) in bankruptcy cases:

a. None. 

4. The name of each victim (individual or corporate) of civil and criminal 

conduct alleged to be wrongful, including every person who may be entitled 

to restitution:

a. MARK ROSEMAN

I hereby certify that, except as disclosed above, I am unaware of any actual 

or potential conflict of interest involving the district judge and magistrate judge 

assigned to this case, and will immediately notify the Court in writing on learning 

of any such conflict. I further certify that I have inserted “None” if there is no 

actual or potential conflict of interest.

Dated: December 1, 2022

/s/ Joshua E. Feygin

Case 9:22-cv-81868-XXXX Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2022 Page 2 of 3
JOSHUA FEYGIN, ESQ.

FL Bar No.: 124685

Email: Josh@JFeyginesq.com

JOSHUA FEYGIN, PLLC

1930 Harrison St, Suite 208F

Hollywood, FL 33020

Tel: (954) 228-5674

Fax: (954) 697-0357

Counsel for Plaintiff, MARK ROSEMAN

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 1, 2022, I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court, Southern 

District of Florida, using the CM/ECF system, and that the foregoing document was 

served electronically to all counsel of record.

/s/ Joshua E. Feygin

JOSHUA FEYGIN, ESQ.

FL Bar No.: 124685

Case 9:22-cv-81868-XXXX Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2022 Page 3 of 3
H. R. 4975

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To designate the post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal Square, Newark,

New Jersey, as the ‘‘Frank R. Lautenberg Post Office and Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal Square,

Newark, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank

R. Lautenberg Post Office and Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the post office and courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Frank R. Lautenberg Post Office and Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
### U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (Mailcode 7101 M) Washington, D.C. 20460

OPPTS-RCS-OMB-7f (revised 11/15/2010) If you have any questions about this regulatory action or this documentation, please call the contact: Name: eMail: Phone: 

### Title of Action: 

## Documentation of Changes Made During Review Under Executive Order 12866

Docket #: EPA-HQ- FRL#: RIN: 2070-

This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). According to section 6(a)(3)(E) of the Executive Order, whenever the Agency makes publicly available an action that was reviewed under Executive Order 12866, the Agency is also required to:

(1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review under the Executive Order, i.e., the text of the draft action and, if applicable, an assessment of the potential costs and benefits; as well as additional information required for those actions that are determined to be economically significant under section 3(f) of the Executive Order (see section 6(a)(3)(B) & (C)); (2) Identify for the public any substantive changes made to the draft submitted to OMB, using a method that is complete, clear and simple; and (3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA/OMB. 

### For this action, were substantive changes made during the review? [Check the appropriate answer.]
Yes. [The information identified in items 1-3 below is included in the docket, as applicable.] No. [Only the information identified in item 1 below is included in the docket.] 

### Accordingly, the Agency has included the following information in the public docket for this action: [Check the appropriate box(es).]
(2) Documentation of any substantive changes that were made to the draft document that was submitted to OIRA/OMB for review, when compared with what completed review, using one of the following methods (select one): (1) A copy of the information that was submitted to OIRA for review under the Executive Order.

(3) Documentation of those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OMB , if any, are identified in the document using one of the following methods (select one): (a) A copy of the draft document submitted, with redline and strikeout to show all the substantive changes that were made during the review. (b) A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made during the review, with page and paragraph references to the draft document that was submitted.

(a) Through attributions to OMB in the redline and strikeout version or other document identifying the changes made at OMB's recommendation. (c) Other (please describe):

(b) Other (please describe):

Kathy Davis davis.kathy@epa.gov 703-308-7002 

### A gricultural Worker Protection Standard Revisions; Proposed Rule
OPP-2011-0184 9395-8 A J22

Changes made address interagency comments received through OMB.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 24.9

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and
each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

                                                   /s/  David P. Zarin, M.D.
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   David P. Zarin, M.D.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5390 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5390

To amend the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act to extend the existence of 
   the interagency working group established under that Act, and to 
  clarify the authority of that group and the application of that Act 
   regarding records pertaining to the Imperial Government of Japan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2000

 Mr. Bilbray introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act to extend the existence of 
   the interagency working group established under that Act, and to 
  clarify the authority of that group and the application of that Act 
   regarding records pertaining to the Imperial Government of Japan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nazi and Japanese War Crimes 
Disclosure Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO NAZI WAR CRIMES DISCLOSURE ACT.

    (a) Extension of Interagency Working Group.--Section 2(b)(1) of the 
Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act (Pub. Law 105-246; 5 U.S.C. 552 note) is 
amended by striking ``3 years'' and inserting ``5 years''.
    (b) Clarification Regarding Records Related to Imperial Government 
of Japan.--Section 3(a) of such Act is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(D) by inserting ``, including the 
        Imperial Government of Japan'' after ``ally of the Nazi 
        government of Germany''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(A) by inserting ``, including the 
        Imperial Government of Japan'' after ``allied with that 
        government''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 10.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report on Form20-F of Triple P N.V. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2002 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned Robert Pijselman, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)          the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   May 28, 2003 | /s/ R.E. Pijselman      |   |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                            | R.E. Pijselman          |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### W. Clark WISE and Honora Wise, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 13458.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 15, 1958.

Fred H. Mandel, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.

Charles K. Rice, Nelson P. Rose, Rollin H. Transue, Robert N. Anderson, Washington, D. C., and argued by Helen A. Buckley, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and THORNTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard on petition for review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States disallowing net losses sustained by the petitioners from racing harness horses;

And it appearing from the findings of fact of the Tax Court that the raising of and dealing in harness horses by the petitioner, W. Clark Wise, constituted a hobby rather than a business, with the result that expenses from such activity were not deductible losses arising from the ordinary and necessary expenses of carrying on a trade or business —the petitioner having long been engaged in conducting a lucrative automobile agency, from which he received more that $21,000 income during the taxable year;

We think the opinion of the Tax Court is in conformity with our opinion in White v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 227 F.2d 779, certiorari denied 351 U.S. 939, 76 S.Ct. 836, 100 L.Ed. 1466.

Determination of the issue here rests upon findings of fact requiring the application of the rule that such findings will not be disturbed by an appellate court, unless found to be clearly erroneous. United States v. United States Gypsum Company, 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 92 L.Ed. 746; Stout v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 210 F.2d 607; Morton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 6 Cir., 174 F.2d 302, 303, certiorari denied 338 U.S. 828, 70 S.Ct. 77, 94 L.Ed. 503.

The decision of the Tax Court is, accordingly, affirmed.
#### DAVID A. BANKER, Appellant, *v.*ELLEN M. BANKER, Respondent.

*New trial in equity cause*— *when not granted.*

Although courts of equity may and will, in proper cases, grant a new trial in a suit in which the judgment binds the plaintiff as to his inheritance, in analogy to the statutory right of a defeated party in an action of ejectment, yet such rule does not apply to an action brought by an heir at. law against the widow of his deceased father to have the marriage declared void on account of the lunacy of the father at the time of the marriage, as a judgment therein sustaining the marriage does not defeat the plaintiff’s right as heir, but at most merely suspends his possession of a portion of the estate for the life of the defendant.

. Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the trial of this action by the court at Special Term.

*James*Lansing, for the appellant.

*R. A. Parmenter,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

James, J.

Present—Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5273 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5273

 To clarify the intention of the Congress with regard to the authority 
 of the United States Mint to produce numismatic coins, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2000

   Mr. Bachus (for himself, Mr. Leach, Mr. LaFalce, and Ms. Waters) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the intention of the Congress with regard to the authority 
 of the United States Mint to produce numismatic coins, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Mint Numismatic Coin 
Clarification Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MINT'S AUTHORITY.

    (a) Silver Proof Coins.--Section 5132(a)(2)(B)(i) of title 31, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``paragraphs (1)'' and 
inserting ``paragraphs (2)''.
    (b) Platinum Coins.--Section 5112(k) of title 31, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``bullion'' and inserting ``platinum 
bullion coins''.

SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL REPORT REQUIREMENT.

    Section 5134(e)(2) of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``reflect'' and inserting ``contain'';
            (2) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (C);
            (3) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D) 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(E) a supplemental schedule detailing--
                            ``(i) the costs and expenses for the 
                        production, for the marketing, and for the 
                        distribution of each denomination of 
                        circulating coins produced by the Mint during 
                        the fiscal year and the per-unit cost of 
                        producing, of marketing, and of distributing 
                        each denomination of such coins; and
                            ``(ii) the gross revenue derived from the 
                        sales of each such denomination of coins.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 102-118.55 What administrative procedures must my agency establish for payment of freight, household goods, or other transportation services? Your agency must establish administrative procedures which assure that the following conditions are met: ( a ) The negotiated price is fair and reasonable;
( b ) A document of agreement signifying acceptance of the arrangements with terms and conditions is filed with the participating agency by the TSP;
( c ) The terms and conditions are included in all transportation agreements and referenced on all transportation documents (TDs);
( d ) Bills are only paid to the TSP providing service under the bill of lading to your agency and may not be waived;
( e ) All fees paid are accounted for in the aggregate delivery costs;
( f ) All payments are subject to applicable statutory limitations;
( g ) Procedures (such as an unique numbering system) are established to prevent and detect duplicate payments, properly account for expenditures and discrepancy notices;
( h ) All transactions are verified with any indebtedness list. On charge card transactions, your agency must consult any indebtedness list if the charge card contract provisions allow for it; and
( i ) Procedures are established to process any unused tickets.
#### § 102-73.230 When must Federal agencies submit a prospectus to lease real property?

In accordance with 40 U.S.C. 3307, Federal agencies must submit a prospectus to the Administrator of General Services for leases involving a net annual rental, excluding services and utilities, in excess of the prospectus threshold provided in 40 U.S.C. 3307. Agencies must be aware that prospectus thresholds are indexed and change each year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      15,348,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,019,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,237,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            68,572,000
<PP&E>                                      41,533,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              30,522,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,942,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,317,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       483,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,121,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,942,000
<SALES>                                     37,579,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,579,000
<CGS>                                       33,307,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,307,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,779,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             723,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,211,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   948,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,159,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,159,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.66)


</TABLE>