alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 113 (Monday, June 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36815-36816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14750]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families

[Program Announcement No. 93612-005]


Administration for Native Americans Programs--Supplemental 
Funding for InterTribal Bison Cooperative/90NA7059

AGENCY: Administration for Native Americans (ANA), ACF, DHHS.

[[Page 36816]]


ACTION: Notice of Supplemental Funding Award.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administration for Native Americans announces that a non-
competitive grant award is being made to the InterTribal Bison 
Cooperative in the amount of $140,190 for Grant #90NA7059. The project 
period is September 1, 1998--August 341, 2000. This supplement will 
augment Year 2 funding to allow for the hiring of necessary staff as 
well as other supports to facilitate the completion of all original 
objectives projected under the grant. The InterTribal Bison Cooperative 
is funded to provide services to forty-two member tribes, including: 
Marketing and sales; land base and production capacity; research and 
development of herd management and a collaboration with tribal colleges 
in developing bison curricula.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois Hodge, Grants Officer, Department 
of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Grants Administration, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., Mail Stop 
HHH 326F, Washington, DC 20447, telephone: 202-401-2344 or Georgeline 
Sparks, Program Specialist, Administration for Native Americans, DHHS./
ACF/ANA, 370 L'Enfant Promenade SW., Washington, DC 20447, telephone: 
202-690-6420.

    Authority: This award will be made pursuant to Native Americans 
Programs Act of 1974 as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2991 B. (CFDA 93.612).

    Dated: June 5, 2000.
Gary Mounts,
Acting Commissioner, Administration for Native Americans.
[FR Doc. 00-14750 Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Opinion issued June 27, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00485-CR

———————————

IN RE ELDRIDGE MCKNIGHT, JR., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Eldridge McKnight, Jr., pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated sexual 

assault of a child.1 In January 2001, the trial court accepted McKnight’s plea, 

deferred adjudication on the charge, and sentenced McKnight to six years’ 

community supervision. In December 2005, the trial court revoked McKnight’s 

community supervision and sentenced him to eight years’ confinement. McKnight 

 1 The underlying case is State v. McKnight, No. 31,585, in the 240th District Court 

of Fort Bend County, Texas. 
2

has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, contending that his conviction and 

sentence are void because (1) a person convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a 

child is not eligible for community supervision, (2) the statute of limitations 

expired before he was indicted, and (3) an associate judge rendered the judgment. 

McKnight seeks relief from a final felony conviction. This Court is without 

jurisdiction to grant such relief because the exclusive remedy for final felony 

convictions is a writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 

(West 2005); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the 

Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); In re McAfee, 53 

S.W.3d 715, 717−18 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). And 

only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction 

habeas corpus proceedings. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07; Bd. of 

Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene, 910 S.W.2d at 483; In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d at

717−18. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of 

jurisdiction, and we dismiss all pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RONALD FAY SCHERMERHORN,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00236-CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1323955R)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until January 7, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Brian Salvant, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare the 

Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before January 7, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of December, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Hiroaki Nishio 

COMPLAINANT 

v. 

Commonwealth Ports Anthority 

RESPONDENT. 

Docket No. 16-13-03 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CPR Part 16 (Rules of Practice). Pursuant to the Rules of Practice, 

§ 16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management 

Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before 

April3, 2015 . 

. L· /QJ 

(' 

Director, Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I 11 ' [ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on \; f\YLU 1 1 ( , 2015, I placed in the United States mail (first class, 

postage paid), a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time addressed to: 

Hiroaki Nishio 

P.O. Box 5910 CHRB 

Saipan, MP 96950 

Complainant 

Maryann Q. Lizama 

Acting Executive Director 

Commonwealth Ports Authority 

Saipan International Airport 

P.O. Box 501055 

Saipan, MP 96950-1055 

Respondent 

Robert Tenorio Torres 

Attorney at Law 

P.O. Box 503758 CK 

Saipan, MP 96950 

Counsel to the Respondent 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

/},/ , l I (, ' y' / l )Jtt"VL '/l /----

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, William L.
Walton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William L. WaltonName:
    William L. WaltonDate: August 8, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-81883-RAR

BRITTANY ROBERSON, et al.,

individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________________/

REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court sua sponte. This case is hereby REFERRED for 

purposes of a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge William Matthewman. Except as 

provided under Local Rule 16.2.E, the appearance of counsel and each party, or representatives of 

each party with full authority to enter into a full and complete settlement, is mandatory. All 

discussions, representations, and statements made at the settlement conference shall be 

confidential and privileged. If the case is settled at the settlement conference, counsel shall 

promptly notify the Court by filing a notice of settlement signed by counsel of record within three

(3) days of the conference. 

Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of 

appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to the dismissal of this action or entry of default.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 2nd day of February, 2024.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 187 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024 Page 1 of 1
#### C. F. Eisley v. Elizabeth S. Horr.

Filed October 2, 1894.

No. 4705.

1. negotiable Instruments : Sureties. Where two makers of a promissory note are shown to he sureties for a third party, they will he presumed to he co-sureties until the contrary is shown.

2. -: -. Evidence *held*to sustain the finding of the trial court.

Error from the district court of Madison county. Tried below before Powers, J.

*4*Mapes & Licey,*for plaintiff in error,

cited: *Williams v. Bosson,*11 O., 62; *Keith*v. *Goodwin,*31 Vt., 268; *Chapeze v. Young,*9 S. W. Rep. [Ky.], 399 ; Brandt, Suretyship, 230; *Oldham v. Broom,*28 O. St., 41; *Adams v. Flanagan,*36 Vt., 400.

*Wigton & Whitham, contra,*

cited: *Norton v. Coons,*3 Denio [N. Y.], 132; *Warner v. Price,*3 Wend. [N. Y.], 397; *Norton v. Coons,*6 N. Y., 33; Story, Contracts, sec. 584; *Price v. Edwards,*11 Mo., 526; *Knox v.Vallandingham,*13 S. & M. [Miss.], 526.

Post, J.

This was an action by the plaintiff in error to recover from the defendant in error and one Livingston the sum of $160 and interest on account of money paid as an accommodation indorsed for said defendants. The allegations of the petition are in substance as follows: On the 1st day of March, 1889, the defendants executed their note to the Farmers Loan & Trust Company in the sum of $260, due June 1 after date; that the plaintiff, at the request of the defendants and for their accommodation, signed said note as surety. On the maturity of said note there remained due thereon $160, which the plaintiff was compelled to pay and which he seeks to recover by this proceeding. Livingston made default, but the defendant in error answered admitting the execution of the note and the payment by the plaintiff as alleged, but denied that the note was signed by plaintiff for her accommodation, and alleged that she was merely a co-surety with the plaintiff for Livingston. She also alleged the payment of $100 on said note. The allegations of the answer were all put in issue by the reply.

From the above statement it appears that there were two questions to be determined from the evidence, viz., whether the relation between the parties was that of principal and surety, or whether they were co-sureties for Livingston. *5Second — The alleged payment of $100 by defendant. The issues were tried to the court without the assistance of a jury and resulted in a general finding for the defendant, upon which judgment was entered and which it is sought to reverse by means of this proceeding. The only evidence before the court was the testimony of the parties who sustained the allegations of their respective pleadings. Upon such a record, following the recognized rule of this court, we must regard the finding of the trial court as conclusive. The parties are presumed to be co-sureties and equally bound for the default of their principal *(Orvis v. Newell,*17 Conn., 97; *Baldwin v. Fleming,*90 Ind., 177; 2 Randolph, Commercial Papers, 976); and this presumption we assume was one of the considerations which led to the finding of the district court. There is no error in the record and the judgment is

Affirmed.
#### § 963.1 Authority for the rules.

These rules of practice are issued by the Judicial Officer of the U.S. Postal Service pursuant to authority delegated by the Postmaster General (39 CFR 226.2(e)(1)).

[52 FR 18912, May 20, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 10751, Mar. 8, 1994]
OKLAHOMA 

PEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUAliTY 

STEVEN A. THOMPSON 	 BRAD HENRY OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Executive. Director 	 Governor 

February 22,2008. 

Terra International Oklahoma, Inc. 


Attn: Mr. Brian Flanagan 


1000 Terra Drive 


Woodward, OK 73801 


Subject: 	 Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Waiver 


Woodward Plant 


Dear Mr. Flanagan: 

The Oklahonia Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) received a BART waiver 

request for the referenced site on December 1, 2006. 

After the technical review, the ODEQ is approving a waiver for the Woodward Plant. 

This waiver is, based on facility. BART sourceS which are not expected to cause or 

contribute to visibility impacts at Class I areas :based on submitted modeling. 

While ODEQ has approved the waiver, the waiver is subject to EPA and public comment 

during the Regional HaZe State Implementation Program (SIP) approval process. 

Thank you' for your cooperation in this' matter. If we may be of further service, please 

contact Phillip Fielder (405) 702-4100.' 

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73101-1677 

printed on recycled paper with soy ink 

o
##### 



Exhibit 15 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: Re: Registration Statement
Nos. 333-45525, 333-13584, 333-88681, 333-101849, 333-115979,
333-115980, 333-115981, 333-130793 and 333-130792. Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated November 7, 2006 related to our review of
interim financial information. Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant,
or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act. /s/ KPMG LLP Washington, D.C.
November 7, 2006
Draft Agenda

Nov. 9 Meeting of the Low

‐ Voltage Transformer

Negotiated Rulemaking Working Group

11:15 Welcome and Introductions

11:15 – 12:30 Review of LV Analysis; Q&A

12:30 – 1:30 Lunch

1:30 – 3:30 Negotiation of Standard Level

3:30 -- 4:00 Break

4:00 – 5:45 Negotiations

5:45 - 6:00 Wrap-up

6:00 Adjourn
§ 959.22 Proposed findings and conclusions. ( a ) Each party, except one who fails to answer the complaint or, having answered, either fails to appear at the hearing or indicates in the answer that he or she does not desire to appear, may submit proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and supporting reasons either in oral or written form. The presiding officer may also require the parties to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law with supporting reasons.
( b ) Proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and supporting reasons not presented orally before the close of the hearing, shall, unless otherwise directed by the presiding officer, be filed within 15 days after the delivery of the official transcript to the Recorder, who shall notify the parties of the date of its receipt. The proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and supporting reasons shall be set forth in serially numbered paragraphs, and shall state with particularity, all pertinent evidentiary facts in the record with appropriate citations to the transcript or exhibits supporting the proposed findings. Each proposed conclusion of law shall be separately stated.
[39 FR 33213, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended at 63 FR 66052, Dec. 1, 1998]
AmeriCorps
Seniors
Show off your program! Tell us how you’re promoting nutrition, socialization, and well-being by 

sending this form to healthpromotion@acl.hhs.gov. 

Organization/Center Name: 

Address: 

Activity Title:

Purpose of Activity (check all that apply): ☐ Nutrition ☐ Health/Wellness ☐ Socialization

Activity can be conducted (check all that apply):

☐ Virtually

☐ With limited space

☐ Using little/no technology

☐ Other (please explain):

Number of staff needed: 

Supplies needed (300 characters max.): 

Preparation required (600 characters max.): 

Instructions (1500 characters max.): 

Specific goals and desired outcomes (300 characters max.) 

 

Have a photo of this activity? Please submit that too! Note: For us to use the image, it must 

be high-resolution, and we must need a release (next page) for each person in the photo.
PHOTO RELEASE FORM 

Event/activity name: 

Approximate date of event/activity (mm/dd/yyyy): 

Location of event/activity: 

I agree to allow the Administration for Community Living (ACL), its representatives, and

employees to use my photograph and/or story in connection with its promotion of the Senior

Nutrition Program and in other materials related to community living.

I authorize ACL to use and publish the same in print and/or by electronic means, with or without

my name and for any lawful purpose, including publicity, illustration, advertising, and web content.

I understand my story and likeness will not be sold or used in ways not described by this release, 

and that I have the right to revoke the permission granted by this release at any time.

Signature: ______________________________________

Printed name: 

Email address:

Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Signature of parent or guardian (if under age 18): ______________________________________
Helping People Help the Land

Conservation Activity Plan 

Agricultural Energy Management, 

Headquarters 

December 2011

Agricultural Energy 

Management, 

Headquarters

An agricultural energy 

management conservation 

activity plan for farm or ranch 

	


	



evaluation to help a producer 

address on-farm energy 


	




and opportunities. 

NRCS Technical Service Providers 

(TSPs) prepare these plans using 

inputs such as:

  	
	

 energy usage

  	


 agricultural energy users, 

 such as lighting, ventilation, 

 pumping, heating, and cooling

  



	

	


 effective alternatives and 

 resulting estimated energy 

 savings 

  	
	



  
		


TSPs can recommend and plan 

energy conservation practices 

such as:

  
	

  	


  


  	


  !	"		

For more information, please visit 

www.nrcs.usda.gov and search for 

“Technical Service Providers.”

www.nrcs.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider and employer.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                OF BESTWAY, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 of Bestway, Inc.
(the "Issuer").

I, Beth A. Durrett, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

         (i)      the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.


Date:  December 16, 2002                   By: /s/ Beth A. Durrett
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   Name:  Beth A. Durrett


Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 16th day of December, 2002.


-------------------------------------

Name: JEANNE A. ANDRESS
     --------------------------------
Title: Notary Public

My commission expires: April 13, 2006
                      ---------------
December 31, 2014

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 31st day of December, 2014.

10-13-0374-CR	TAB DENNY JOHNSON v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 249TH DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. F47165 – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment be in all things affirmed, and that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
#### § 102-194.15 What is an Optional form?

An Optional form is approved by GSA for nonmandatory Governmentwide use and is used by two or more agencies. This criteria is the same whether the form resides on paper or purely electronic.
§ 95.020 Standard for under the influence of alcohol or a dangerous drug. An individual is under the influence of alcohol or a dangerous drug when: ( a ) The individual is operating a recreational vessel and has a Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) level of .08 percent or more, by weight, in their blood;
( b ) The individual is operating a vessel other than a recreational vessel and has an alcohol concentration of .04 percent by weight or more in their blood; or,
( c ) The individual is operating any vessel and the effect of the intoxicant(s) consumed by the individual on the person's manner, disposition, speech, muscular movement, general appearance or behavior is apparent by observation.
[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47532, Dec. 14, 1987; CGD 84-099, 53 FR 13117, Apr. 21, 1988, as amended by USCG-1998-4593, 66 FR 1862, Jan. 10, 2001]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

READYONE INDUSTRIES, INC.,

 Appellant,

v.

IVETH RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00157-CV

Appeal from

346th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2014-DCV1525)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause to the 

trial court with instructions to enter an order granting Appellant’s motion to compel arbitration, 

in accordance with this Court=s opinion. We further order that Appellant recover from Appellee 

all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue, and this decision be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment