alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-52-000]


Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.; Notice of Informal 
Settlement Conference

June 12, 2000.
    On March 13 and 28, 2000, the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) 
sponsored two informal settlement conferences for the purpose of 
initiating settlement discussions potentially leading to a resolution 
of all the Kansas ad valorem proceedings. During the March 28 
conference, the participants agreed that settlement negotiations among 
all interested parties should be pursued separately for each pipeline 
involved with the Kansas ad valorem tax refund issues.
    An informal settlement conference in the above docket will be held 
on July, 11, 2000, at the offices of Shook, Hardy & Bacon, 1 Kansas 
City Place, 1200 Main Street, Kansas, Missouri. The Director of the 
Commission's Dispute Resolution Service and the KCC will attend the 
conference and facilitate the settlement negotiations.
    All interested parties in the above dockets are requested to attend 
the informal settlement conference. If a party has any questions 
respecting the conference, please call Richard Miles, the Director of 
the Dispute Resolution Service. His telephone number is 1 877 FERC ADR 
(337-2237) or 202-208-0702 and his e-mail address is 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c4e555f545d4e5812515550594f7c5a594e5f125a595812494f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="72001b111a1300165c1f1b1e170132141700115c1417165c0701">[email protected]</span></a>.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15271 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 962.4 Referral of complaint. ( a ) If the Respondent fails to request a hearing within the specified period, the Reviewing Official shall transmit the Complaint to the Judicial Officer for referral to a Presiding Officer, who shall issue an initial decision based upon the information contained in the Complaint.
( b ) If the Respondent files a Hearing Petition, the Reviewing Official, upon receiving a copy of the Petition, shall promptly transmit to the Presiding Officer a copy of the Postal Service's Complaint.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special Committee 194 meeting to be held July 10-13, 2000, starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.

The agenda will include: July 10: Working Group (WG) 3, Human Factors. July 11: WG-1, Data Link Ops Concept & Implementation Plan; WG-3, Human Factors; WG-4, Service Provider Interface. July 12: WG-1, Data Link Ops Concept & Implementation Plan; WG-3, Human Factors; WG-4, Service Provider Interface. July 13: Plenary Session: (1) Welcome and Introductory Remarks; (2) Review Agenda; (3) Review/Approve of Previous Meetings; (4) Working Group Reports; (5) Other Business; (13) Date and Location of Future Meetings; (14) Closing.

Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC. 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 14, 2000.

Jane P. Caldwell,

Designated Official.

[FR Doc. 00-15538 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sento Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 28, 2002,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Patrick F. O’ Neal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Patrick F. O’ Neal                |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |
| Patrick F. O’ Neal                    |
| Chief Executive Officer  November 11, 2002 |

 

----
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 550

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that persons who have

been convicted of a capital crime may not be awarded the Purple Heart.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. MCKEON (for himself and Mr. STUMP) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that

persons who have been convicted of a capital crime may

not be awarded the Purple Heart.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON AWARD OF PURPLE HEART

4 TO PERSONS CONVICTED OF CAPITAL

5 CRIMES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 57 of title 10, United

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow8 ing new section:
2

•HR 550 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1131. Persons convicted of capital crimes: prohibi2 tion of award of Purple Heart

3 ‘‘(a) DISQUALIFICATION.—A person who has been

4 convicted of a capital offense for which the person was

5 sentenced to death or life imprisonment without parole

6 may not be awarded the Purple Heart.

7 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section:

8 ‘‘(1) The term ‘capital offense’ means an of9 fense under Federal or State law for which the

10 death penalty may be imposed.

11 ‘‘(2) The term ‘State’ includes the District of

12 Columbia and any commonwealth or territory of the

13 United States.’’.

14 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such

15 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following

16 new item:

‘‘1131. Persons convicted of capital crimes: prohibition of award of Purple

Heart.’’.

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1131 of title 10,

18 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall

19 apply with respect to the award of the Purple Heart after

20 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 3.7 Information furnished to Board—program review. ( a ) To enable the Board to review the Postal Service operating program, postal management shall furnish the Board information on all aspects of the Postal Service budget plan, including: ( 1 ) Five-year and ten-year plans, annual operating and investment plans, and significant departures from estimates upon which the plans were based;
( 2 ) Productivity measurements (reflecting workload and resource utilization);
( 3 ) The need for rate adjustments and the outcome of significant matters before the Postal Regulatory Commission and related litigation; and
( 4 ) Debt financing needs, including a review of all borrowings of the Postal Service from the U.S. Treasury and private sources.
( b ) To enable the Board to review the effectiveness of the Postal Service's equal employment opportunity program, performance data relating to this program shall be furnished to the Board at least annually. These data shall be categorized in such manner as the Board, from time to time, specifies.
( c ) Postal management shall also regularly furnish the Board information regarding major programs for improving postal service or reducing the cost of postal operations.
( d ) Postal management shall annually provide the Board with a summary of the Annual Compliance Report filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission, which includes data on product costs.
( e ) Management shall furnish to the Board: Information regarding any significant, new program, policy, major modification or initiative; any plan to offer a significant, new or unique product or system implementation; or any significant, new project not related directly to the core business function of the Postal Service. This information shall be provided to the Board in advance of entering into any agreement in furtherance of such project. For the purposes of this paragraph (e), “significant” means a project anticipated to have a notable or conspicuous impact on corporate visibility or the operating budget (including increases in expense amounts) or the capital investment budget. The notification requirement of this paragraph governs applicable projects regardless of the level of expenditure or potential liability involved.
( f ) At the reasonable request of the Board, Postal management shall furnish to the Board such other information as the Board deems necessary.
[73 FR 78983, Dec. 24, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 10013, Feb. 18, 2021; 86 FR 24713, May 10, 2021]
§ 962.26 Settlement. ( a ) Either party may make offers of settlement or proposals of adjustment at any time.
( b ) The Reviewing Official has the exclusive authority to compromise or settle any allegations or determinations of liability under 31 U.S.C. 3802 without the consent of the Presiding Officer, except during the pendency of an appeal to the appropriate United States district court pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3805 or during the pendency of an action to collect any penalties or assessments pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( c ) The Attorney General has the exclusive authority to compromise or settle any penalty or assessment the determination of which is the subject of a pending petition for judicial review, or a pending action to recover such penalty or assessment.
( d ) The Reviewing Official may recommend settlement terms to the Attorney General, as appropriate.
[59 FR 51860, Oct. 13, 1994]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on DoD Frequency Spectrum Issues

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on DoD Frequency Spectrum 
Issues will meet in closed session on June 27-28, 2000, at SAIC, 4001 
N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22203.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this 
meeting, the Task Force will examine the competing interest in and 
access to the RF frequency spectrum and its impact on military 
readiness and national security in the 21st century. This study will 
review and evaluate DOD user frequency spectrum requirements and 
related advances in technology to improve utilization of this finite 
resource.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App II (1994)), it has been 
determined that this Defense Science Board Task Force meeting concerns 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly, 
this meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: June 9, 2000.
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-15079 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### § 102-3.5 What does this part cover and how does it apply?

This part provides the policy framework and establishes minimum requirements that must be used by agency heads and Federal officers in applying the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (FACA or “the Act”), 5 U.S.C. chapter 10, to advisory committees they establish and operate. In addition to listing key definitions underlying the interpretation of the Act, this part establishes the scope and applicability of the Act and outlines specific exclusions from its coverage. This part is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person, including any advisory committee or officer, member, employee, agent, or contractor of any advisory committee.
§ 102-36.385 What are our responsibilities in the disposal of foreign excess personal property? When disposing of foreign excess personal property you must: ( a ) Determine whether it is in the interest of the U.S. Government to return foreign excess personal property to the U.S. for further re-use or to dispose of the property overseas.
( b ) Ensure that any disposal of property overseas conforms to the foreign policy of the United States and the terms and conditions of any applicable Host Nation Agreement.
( c ) Ensure that, when foreign excess personal property is donated or sold overseas, donation/sales conditions include a requirement for compliance with U.S. Department of Commerce and Department of Agriculture regulations when transporting any personal property back to the U.S.
( d ) Inform the U.S. State Department of any disposal of property to any foreign governments or entities.
#### § 102-38.180 May we sell Federal personal property to a Federal employee?

Yes, you may sell Federal personal property to any Federal employee whose agency does not prohibit their employees from purchasing such property. However, unless allowed by Federal or agency regulations, employees having nonpublic information regarding property offered for sale may not participate in that sale (see 5 CFR 2635.703). For purposes of this section, the term “Federal employee” also applies to an immediate member of the employee's household.
§ 3035.104 Change in class of general applicability. ( a ) In the case of a change in class of general applicability, the Postal Service shall file notice of the change with the Commission no later than the date of publication of the decision in the Federal Register, but at least 30 days before the effective date of the increase.
( b ) The notice filed with the Commission shall include an explanation and justification for the change, the effective date, and the record of proceedings regarding such decision.
[72 FR 63697, Nov. 9, 2007. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case No. 1:22-cv-22343-KMM

Jorge Moneagudo Alburqurque,

Plaintiff/Appellant,

v.

The De Moya Group, Inc., et al.,

Defendants/Appellees.

_____________________________________/

Notice of Appeal

The plaintiff, Jorge Monteagudo Alburqurque, appeals to the United States 

Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit from the order denying the plaintiff’s motion 

to alter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, treated as a motion 

for reconsideration, as well as the summary judgment and closing case, upon which 

it is based. [See D.E. 100; D.E. 87.]

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM Document 113 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2023 Page 1 of 3
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on September 25, 2023 I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that 

the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se 

parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via 

transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other 

authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive 

electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC 

1512 E Broward Blvd, Ste 204A 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 

Phone: 954-540-2755 

/s/ Morgan Weinstein 

Morgan Weinstein, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 87796

morgan@twiglaw.com 

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM Document 113 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2023 Page 2 of 3
Service List

Nathaly Saavedra, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 118315 Email: nathaly@peregonza.com

Juan J. Perez, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 115784 Email: juan@peregonza.com

P. Brooks, LaRou, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 1039018

Email: brooks@peregonza.com

PEREGONZA THE ATTORNEYS, PLLC

5201 Blue Lagoon Drive,

Suite 290,

Miami, FL 33126

Tel. (786) 650-0202

Fax. (786) 650-0200

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Reginald J. Clyne, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 654302

reginald.clyne@qpwblaw.com

Chanelle Artiles, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 10006402

chanelle.artiles@qpwblaw.com

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A.

9300 South Dadeland Blvd., 4th Floor

Miami, Florida 33156

Telephone: 305-670-1101

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM Document 113 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2023 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket No. ER00-2811-000]


ISO New England Inc.; Notice of Filing

June 15, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 12, 2000, ISO New England Inc. (the ISO), 
tendered for filing, pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, 
a request for expedited approval of revisions to the NEPOOL Market 
Rules in order to implement changes in market mitigation procedures and 
to facilitate Emergency Energy Transactions.
    Copies of said filing have been served upon the Secretary of the 
NPC, the Participants in the New England Power Pool, non-Participant 
transmission customers and upon the New England State Governors and 
Regulatory Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 26, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15566 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Produced and published at US taxpayer expense 

AmeriCorps NCCC is a national service program 

whose mission is to strengthen communities and 

develop leaders through direct, team-based national 

and community service. Within a full-time, residential 

setting, AmeriCorps NCCC members are assigned to 

a regional campus and placed onto teams of eight to 

12 members. Over the course of their 10-month 

service term, each team will complete a series of 

different projects in different places, with each 

project lasting three to 13 weeks. Members work on 

projects with sponsoring organizations to address 

local community needs in the areas of energy 

conservation, environmental stewardship, 

infrastructure improvement, natural and other 

disaster services, and urban and rural development. 

AmeriCorps collects feedback from sponsoring 

organizations using the AmeriCorps NCCC Sponsor 

Survey to learn about their experiences with the 

program and teams working at sponsor 

organizations’ service projects. A total of 941 

sponsors1 responded to the survey between June 

2016 and September 2019. This fact sheet provides 

an overview of the key findings from the Sponsor 

Survey for the North Central, Pacific, Southern, and 

Southwest regions. For more read the full survey 

report. 

 

AmeriCorps NCCC 

Sponsor Survey Fact Sheet 

Any questions? If you have questions about this fact sheet, please reach out to the AmeriCorps Office of 

Research and Evaluation at evaluation@cns.gov. The AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation 

assists AmeriCorps and its partners in collecting, analyzing, and disseminating data and insights about 

AmeriCorps programs and civic life in America. 

*Visit AmeriCorps NCCC Project Sponsors to learn more 

about the AmeriCorps NCCC sponsors and initiatives in 

your local area. 

About AmeriCorps NCCC AmeriCorps NCCC Regions 

87% 

Community 

Objectives Met 

Communities 

Strengthened 

87% 

The majority of sponsors 

(87 percent) believed to 

a moderate or large 

extent that their 

AmeriCorps NCCC teams 

strengthened the 

communities in which 

they served. 

Work 

Completed 

89% 

The majority of sponsors 

(89 percent) believed 

their organization 

accomplished its work in 

shorter time because of 

their AmeriCorps NCCC 

teams. 

The majority of sponsors 

(87 percent) felt that 

AmeriCorps NCCC teams 

met or exceeded their 

communities’ primary 

objectives. 

Nearly all sponsors 

(94 percent) were 

satisfied or very satisfied 

with their AmeriCorps 

NCCC teams. 

Satisfied 

94% 

1

The Atlantic region closed in 2018. Of the 941 responses represented in this report, the NCCC Atlantic Regional Campus had 62 responses. 

SELECTED FINDINGS 

OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND EVALUATION