alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Craig T. Davenport, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                          
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

|                     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/ Craig T. Davenport       
|                     |  |                              
|                     |  | Craig T. Davenport           
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 102-118.430 What is the process the GSA Transportation Audits Division employs to conduct a postpayment audit? The GSA Transportation Audits Division ( a ) Audits select TSP bills after payment;
( b ) Audits select TSP bills before payment as needed to protect the Government's interest;
( c ) Examines, settles, and adjusts accounts involving payment for transportation and related services for the account of agencies;
( d ) Adjudicates and settles transportation claims by and against agencies;
( e ) Offsets an overcharge by any TSP from an amount subsequently found to be due that TSP;
( f ) Issues a Notice of Overcharge stating that a TSP owes a debt to the agency. This notice states the amount paid and the basis for the proper charge for the document reference number (DRN), and cites applicable contract, tariff, or tender, along with other data relied on to support the overcharge; and
( g ) Issues a GSA Notice of Indebtedness when a TSP owes an ordinary debt to an agency. This notice states the basis for the debt, the TSP's rights, interest, penalty, and other results of nonpayment. The debt is due immediately and is subject to interest charges, penalties, and administrative cost under 31 U.S.C. 3717.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23946-KMM

 Plaintiff,

vs.

WEST MARINE PRODUCTS, INC.,

Florida for Profit Corporation 

Defendant,

____________________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE/STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

 Plaintiff, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, through undersigned attorney Diego G. Mendez and 

Richard J Adams, pursuant to the Federal Rules Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) files this Joint 

Notice/Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice against Defendant, WEST MARINE 

PRODUCTS, INC. All claims and counter claims by all parties are hereby dismissed with prejudice 

by stipulation. Each party shall bear their own attorney fees and costs. 

Submitted by:

Mendez Law Offices, PLLC Ogletree Deakins

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant

P.O. BOX 228630 100 North Tampa Street

Miami, Florida 33172 Suite 3600

Telephone: 305.264.9090 Tampa, FL 33602

Facsimile: 1-305.809.8474 813-221-7249

Email:info@mendezlawoffices.com Email: gretchen.lehman@ogletree.com

By: /s/ By:______/s/__________________.

DIEGO GERMAN MENDEZ, ESQ. GRETCHEN LEHMAN

FL BAR NO.: 52748 FL BAR NO.: 46365

Adams & Associates, P.A.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

6500 Cowpen Road, Suite 101

Miami Lakes, FL 33014

Telephone: 305-824-9800

Facsimile: 305-824-3868

Email: radamslaw@bellsouth.net

By: /s/ 

RICHARD J. ADAMS, ESQ

FL BAR NO.: 770434

###

Case 1:22-cv-23946-KMM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2023 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 2 3, 2020

t0318

Order 

Clerk

March 23, 2020

159342

JILL CREECH BAUER, JILL CREECH BAUER

LEGAL SERVICES, PLLC, and ATTORNEYS

FOR INDIGENT MOTHERS, PLLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 159342

COA: 339703 

Genesee CC: 15-105396-CZ

JESSICA HAMMON, ERICA EDGINGTON,

NICHOLAS D’AIGLE, LAW OFFICES OF

JESSICA J. HAMMON, PLLC, ATTORNEYS

FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE, PLLC, MARCIA

L. STIPES, LAW OFFICES OF J.J. EDWARDS,

PLLC, and JADE EDWARDS,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 551

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that military reservists

who are retained in active status after qualifying for reserve retired

pay shall be given credit toward computation of such retired pay for

service performed after so qualifying.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. MCNULTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that

military reservists who are retained in active status after

qualifying for reserve retired pay shall be given credit

toward computation of such retired pay for service performed after so qualifying.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPUTATION OF YEARS OF SERVICE IN COM4 PUTING RESERVE RETIRED PAY.

5 (a) CREDIT FOR DAYS AFTER QUALIFYING FOR RE6 TIRED PAY.—Section 12733(1) of title 10, United States

7 Code, is amended by inserting before the period the follow-
2

•HR 551 IH

1 ing: ‘‘, including the person’s days served in active status

2 after qualifying for retired pay under this chapter, which

3 shall be credited when the person leaves active status’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply to any person who qualifies after

6 January 1, 1988, for retired pay under chapter 1223 of

7 title 10, United States Code, or under chapter 67 of such

8 title as in effect before December 1, 1994.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vsource, Inc. (the registrant) for the year ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Dennis M. Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 13, 2005



|    |  |                                                    
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /S/ Dennis M. Smith                                
|    |  | Dennis M. Smith                                    
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this
report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it
by reference.
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.304 Effect of State or local law or other requirements and effect of employment opportunities. ( a ) The obligation to comply with this subpart is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any State or local law or other requirement that, on the basis of handicap, imposes prohibitions or limits upon the eligibility of qualified handicapped persons to receive services or to practice any occupation or profession.
( b ) The obligation to comply with this subpart is not obviated or alleviated because employment opportunities in any occupation or profession are or may be more limited for handicapped persons than for nonhandicapped persons.
ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 31.1

                       Section 302 Certification

I, Steven Markowitz, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allen Organ
  Company;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
  the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
  cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
  this report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have:
   a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
      the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
   b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our
      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
      and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
      report based on such evaluation; and
   c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the
      registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
  reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
  registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):
   a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
      which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
      ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
      information; and
   b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting.

/s/STEVEN MARKOWITZ
Steven Markowitz
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWave propagation in anisotropic medium due to an oscillatory point source with application to unidirectional compositesThe far-field displacements in an infinite transversely isotropic elastic medium subjected to an oscillatory concentrated force are derived. The concepts of velocity surface, slowness surface and wave surface are used to describe the geometry of the wave propagation process. It is shown that the decay of the wave amplitudes depends not only on the distance from the source (as in isotropic media) but also depends on the direction of the point of interest from the source. As an example, the displacement field is computed for a laboratory fabricated unidirectional fiberglass epoxy composite. The solution for the displacements is expressed as an amplitude distribution and is presented in polar diagrams. This analysis has potential usefulness in the acoustic emission (AE) and ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation of composite materials. For example, the transient localized disturbances which are generally associated with AE sources can be modeled via this analysis. In which case, knowledge of the displacement field which arrives at a receiving transducer allows inferences regarding the strength and orientation of the source, and consequently perhaps the degree of damage within the composite.Document ID19860018194Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWilliams, J. H., Jr.*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Marques, E. R. C.*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Lee, S. S.*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1986Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberE-3093NAS 1.26:4001NASA-CR-4001Accession Number86N27666Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-43-11CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-328Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860018194.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Annual Certified Product Summary Report

Version 1.0 December 2007 1 

## A NNUAL 

## C ERTIFIED 

## P RODUCT 

## S UMMARY 

## R EPORT

Please complete and submit by January 31 of every year the following information for all products that you have certified to any WaterSense® Specifications for the previous calendar year. If you prefer, you may attach a printout or file with this information as long as it contains all of the fields described below.

General Information

Product Certification Body Name:

Contact Name (for questions from EPA WaterSense Team regarding this form)

Name: Telephone:

Fax: E-mail:

Product Certification Summary

List Type of

Product Number of Products

Tested Number of Products Certified Number of Products

Failed Number of Products Suspended Number of Products Withdrawn Number of Products Reinstated

HET Lavatory Faucet



### Label Misuse/Dispute Action Summary

As part of your responsibilities as a Licensed Certifying Body, EPA requests that you provide summary level data related to common label misuse problems identified and common dispute actions taken during the year. Please document the frequency of occurrence for all of the applicable scenarios listed in the table below (attach additional sheets if necessary):Annual Certified Product Summary Report

Version 1.0 December 2007 2 Problem Frequency of Occurrence Label used in conjunction with an uncertified product from by a manufacturer that has other products certified Label used in conjunction with an uncertified product from a manufacturer that does not have products certified Continued use of label on a product with suspended/withdrawn certification Label modified from original provided by product certification body Label not used in conjunction with a specific certified product Label used to represent product endorsement by EPA or product certification body Label used on general water efficiency promotional material Use of any other WaterSense logo to promote product 1 Use of the WaterSense label prior to receiving certification Other: (Describe below) Common label misuse problems

Manufacturer does not have an ac tive Partnership Agreement with EPA Product fails to meet WaterSense criteria during routine surveillance Manufacturer not adhering to requirements for product certification Failure to take corrective acti ons with specified timeframe Breach of licensing agreement with product certification body Other: (Describe below) Common dispute actions



### Mail this form to: OR Fax this form to: OR Email this form to: EPA WaterSense Program EPA WaterSense Program watersense@epa.gov c/o ERG c/o ERG 2300 Wilson Boulevard (703) 841-1440 Suite 350 Arlington, VA 22201

1 Corrective action for this type of label misuse is typically handled by EPA. If such a situation is encountered during routine su rveillance, EPA requests t hat you track these occu rrences and notify EPA immediately so that corrective actions may be taken.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00487-CR

William Berry Pierce, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN SABA COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 5581, HONORABLE JAMES F. CLAWSON JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On June 7, 2010, Lou Ann Lindeman Berry, court reporter for the 33rd District Court,

San Saba County, filed an affidavit in this Court stating that all copies of the reporter’s record in this

cause have either been deleted or destroyed by a computer virus, that attempts have been made to

recover the record from Berry’s computer, and that these attempts have been unsuccessful. We then

abated this appeal to allow the trial court to determine whether the reporter’s record can be replaced

by agreement of the parties. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(f)(4). On August 23, 2010, we received a

supplemental record containing the trial court’s findings that the reporter’s record cannot be replaced

by agreement of the parties. Because the lost or destroyed record contains the entirety of the

appellant’s trial, we conclude that the lost record is necessary to resolution of this appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 34.6(f)(3). As a result, the appellant is entitled to a new trial. See Tex. R. App.

P. 34.6(f). We reverse the judgment of conviction and remand this cause for a new trial.
2

___________________________________________

 Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Reversed and Remanded

Filed: September 22, 2010

Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SUNBEAM CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 29, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                          57,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  252,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    208,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               634,848
<PP&E>                                         365,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                 136,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,089,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          258,149
<BONDS>                                        174,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           896
<OTHER-SE>                                     454,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,089,345
<SALES>                                        541,059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               541,059
<CGS>                                          398,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 73,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,795
<DISCONTINUED>                                (13,713)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>