alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Stephanie A. Casey, of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Golden State Warriors, LLC (“GSW”), and requests that all 

papers served in this case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following attorney appears on behalf of GSW in this 

action as required under the Rules, and is entering this appearance without prejudice to, or waiver 

of, GSW’s personal jurisdiction defense or any other defenses. This is not a general appearance in 

Garrison or any other action.

Dated: April 6, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Stephanie Casey

Stephanie A. Casey

Florida Bar No. 97483

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Email: scasey@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Golden State Warriors, LLC

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
- 1 - A lexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

April 19, 2012

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta, KLM, and SkyWest

For a Statement of Authorization

Docket DOT-OST-2004-19214

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brett Kruger, DOT Gerry Murphy, Counsel for SkyWest Willem de Jonge, KLM
info@airlineinfo.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q OF ALCAN ALUMINUM LIMITED FOR THE QUARTER EBDED 31 MARCH 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,782
<PP&E>                                          13,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,775
<BONDS>                                            877
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        160
<COMMON>                                         1,243
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,904
<SALES>                                          1,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,979
<CGS>                                            1,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    277
<INCOME-TAX>                                       104
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       174
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.78


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Victor M. Perez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allis-Chalmers Energy Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation;(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        *Date: November 10, 2005* *By:  **/s/ Victor M. Perez*    *Victor M. Perez*    *Chief Financial Officer*
The Visual Arts Group, LLC

UAS Operations

Aircraft Description

Make and Model UAV Type Maximum Gross take-off 

weight

1. DJI Inspire 1 rotocraft 3 KG

2. DJI S1000 rotocraft 14KG

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). 

This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

05/04/2015
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2140

Lower Tribunal No. 2017-CF-001435

_____________________________

ERRICK HOLMES,JR.,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from Osceola County.

Keith A. Carsten, Judge.

June 4, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., and LAMBERT, B.D., Associate Judge, concur.

Errick Holmes, Jr., Punta Gorda, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
§ 101-5.104-7 Administrator's determination. ( a ) The Administrator of General Services will determine, on the basis of the feasibility study, whether provision of a centralized service meets the criteria for increased economy, efficiency, and service, with due regard to the program and internal administrative requirements of the agencies to be served. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the head of each agency affected will be advised of the Administrator's determination and of the reasons therefor. Each determination to provide a centralized service shall include a formal report containing an explanation of the advantages to be gained, a comparison of estimated annual costs between the proposed centralized operation and separate agency operations, and a statement of the date the centralized facility will be fully operational.
( b ) While a formal appeals procedure is not prescribed, any agency desiring to explain its inability to participate in the use of a centralized service may do so through a letter to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, with a copy to the Administrator of General Services.
[42 FR 35853, July 12, 1977]
Dale R. Young, Tucs on, AZ. FAA Request for Exemption August 26, 2015

Equipment Hyperlinks:

DJI S1000

http://download.dji

- innovations.com/downloads/s1000/en/S1000_User_Manual_v1.10_en.pdf

DJI S900

http://download.dji

- innovations.com/downloads/s900/en/S900_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf

DJI S800

http://download.dji

- innovations.com/downloads/s800/S800_User_Manual_en.pdf

3D Robotics SOLO

http://3drobotics.com/wp

- content/uploads/2015/08/v5_08_21_1 5.pdf

http://download.dji

innovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf
Exhibit
10.2


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE LETTER
BY AND BETWEEN WELLESLEY


BANK AND Michael
W. Dvorak


 


WHEREAS,
Wellesley Bank (the "Bank") issued a severance letter dated May 23, 2016
to Michael W. Dvorak ("Executive") which sets forth the severance benefits
the Executive is entitled to in the event Executive: (i) is terminated without Cause absent a Change in Control, (ii) is terminated
without cause within 12 months following a Change in Control or (iii) voluntarily terminates employment within 12 months following
a Change in Control as a result of not being offered a comparable position with a successor (the "Severance Letter");


 


WHEREAS,
the Bank wishes to amend the Severance Letter to make certain clarifications to ensure compliance with Section 409A of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the Severance Letter is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph immediately after the General Release
bullet:


 


''This
arrangement is intended to comply with the separation pay exemption under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as
amended (the "Code"). For purposes of Section 409A of the Code ("Section 409A"), each installment payment
provided under this arrangement will be treated as a separate payment. If any payment is
subject to (rather than exempt from) Section 409A, this Severance Letter will be interpreted and administered to comply with
Section 409A, and any such payment subject to Section 409A that is to be made upon a termination of employment (i) will only
be made upon a "separation from service" under Section 409A, and (ii) if Executive is a "specified
employee" (as determined under Section 409A) at the time of separation from service, will not be made until six months
and one day after Executive's separation from service to the extent required under Section 409A."


 


In all other respects,
the terms and conditions of the Severance Letter are hereby affirmed.


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this amendment as of the date noted below.


 


	 	WELLESLEY BANK
	 	By:	/s/ Thomas J. Fontaine
	 	Date:	10/1/2019
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Michael W. Dvorak
	 	Date:	10/1/2019
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 604 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 604

            To amend the charter of the AMVETS organization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

 Mr. Stump (for himself and Mr. Evans) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To amend the charter of the AMVETS organization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO AMVETS CHARTER.

    (a) Name of Organization.--(1) Sections 22701(a) and 22706 of title 
36, United States Code, are amended by striking ``AMVETS (American 
Veterans of World War II, Korea, and Vietnam)'' and inserting ``AMVETS 
(American Veterans)''.
    (2)(A) The heading of chapter 227 of such title is amended to read 
as follows:

              ``CHAPTER 227--AMVETS (AMERICAN VETERANS)''.

    (B) The item relating to such chapter in the table of chapters at 
the beginning of subtitle II of such title is amended to read as 
follows:

``227. AMVETS (AMERICAN VETERANS)...........................   22701''.
    (b) Governing Body.--Section 22704(c)(1) of such title is amended 
by striking ``seven national vice commanders'' and all that follows 
through ``a judge advocate,'' and inserting ``two national vice 
commanders, a finance officer, a judge advocate, a deputy judge 
advocate, a chaplain, a VAVS representative, six national district 
commanders,''.
    (c) Headquarters and Principal Place of Business.--Section 22708 of 
such title is amended--
            (1) by striking ``the District of Columbia'' in the first 
        sentence and inserting ``the Washington/Baltimore Metropolitan 
        area''; and
            (2) by striking ``the District of Columbia'' in the second 
        sentence and inserting ``that metropolitan area''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


STI Multipliers for Fiscal Year 2020


	
				
	Management Tier
	EPS
Growth
Multiplier
	FCF
Multiplier
	Maximum Payment Cap
(% Base Salary)

	Chief Executive Officer
	4.500
	0.1500
	100%

	Other Named Executive Officers
	3.375
	0.1125
	75%
#### § 102-36.205 Is there a limit to how much excess personal property we may furnish to our grantees?

Yes, you must monitor transfers of excess personal property so the total dollar amount of property transferred (in original acquisition cost) does not exceed the dollar value of the grant. Any transfers above the grant amount must be approved by an official at an administrative level higher than the officer administering the grant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-62111-RAR

PILCO INVESTMENTS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Second 

Amended Complaint [ECF No. 21] (“Motion”), filed on January 6, 2023. The Court held a hearing 

on the Motion on February 9, 2023 [ECF No. 33] (“Hearing”). The Court hasreviewed the Motion, 

Plaintiff’s Amended Response in Opposition [ECF No. 30], and Defendant’s Reply in Support

[ECF No. 31]. For the reasons stated on the record during the Hearing, and being otherwise fully 

advised, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s Motion [ECF No. 21] is GRANTED as 

follows: 

1. All counts contained in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 17] are 

DISMISSED with leave to amend. As explained at the Hearing, while the Second Amended 

Complaint alleges Plaintiff “suffered a loss during the policy period . . . in the form of a [roof leak], 

caused by wind and rain from Storm Eta, in such a fashion as to cause substantial damage” to each 

property, these allegations are too conclusory to satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 8. 

Second Am. Compl. ¶¶ 7–9 (alteration in original). Plaintiff must supplement these allegations 

Case 0:22-cv-62111-RAR Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

with further information regarding, at a minimum, the damage to each property, the nature of such

damages, and their causes. See Viamontes v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., No. 20-22532, 2020 WL 

5981680, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 8, 2020).

2. Plaintiff shall file a Third Amended Complaint within 10 days of the date of this 

Order.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 9th day of February, 2023.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 0:22-cv-62111-RAR Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2023 Page 2 of 2
Page 4 e. Chemical Structure Diagram

R

N

+

CH3

H3C

Cl

OH

ClEpi-Quat 

Intermediate 145 = Stearyl quat

R = C18 alkyl
§ 102-40.40 What are our responsibilities concerning personal property requiring special handling? You are responsible for— ( a ) Identifying and accounting for property with special handling requirements;
( b ) Complying with applicable Federal, state, and local laws and regulations concerning the handling, storage, labeling, use, and final disposition of such property;
( c ) Ensuring adequate storage and safeguarding of such property, *e.g.,* secured or limited access storage areas, warning signs, and protective clothing and equipment; and
( d ) Transporting materials requiring special handling in accordance with Department of Transportation (DOT), EPA, state and local regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SPINTEX
     GAMING TECHNOLOGIES,  INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
     1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         500
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  229
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    679
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,454
<PP&E>                                         204
<DEPRECIATION>                                 60
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,467
<BONDS>                                        2,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          5,355
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       40
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,469)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,744
<SALES>                                        444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444
<CGS>                                          280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               180
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,787)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,787)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 

STATE OF DELAWARE 
  

			
	CERTIFICATE NO.	  	NUMBER OF SHARES

 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

Authorized        Shares of 

4.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series GG, Par Value $1.00 Per Share 

This certifies that Computershare Inc., as Depositary, is the owner of        shares of 4.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series GG, par value $1.00 per share, of JPMorgan Chase & Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), fully paid and
non-assessable, transferable only upon the books of the Corporation, in person or by attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers
this                day
of                ,        . 
  

					
			
	 	  		  	 

 The Corporation will furnish, without charge to each stockholder who so requests, the powers, designations, preferences and
relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. 












 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _____________________________ does hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto ____________________________________ (________) Shares represented by within Certificate, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ___________________________________ as its attorney to transfer such Shares on the books and
records of the Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated: _________________, 20__. 

 

							
	In presence of:	  		  	Stockholder:	  	
				
	 	  		  	 	  	
	Name:	  		  	Name:	  	


  
 2
Corporation for National and Community Service (operating as AmeriCorps) Quarterly FOIA Report

Fiscal Year 2023, Quarter Q2

1. Ten Oldest Pending Requests: 6

2. Ten Oldest Requests Closed: 5

3. Agency Component Abbreviations

Component 

Abbreviation Component Name

CNCS Corporation for National and Community Service

Agency / 

Component

Number of requests 

backlogged

Number of requests 

processed

Number of requests 

received

CNCS 3 13 17
#### § 102-75.1030 May Federal agencies abandon or destroy property in any manner they decide?

No, Federal agencies may not abandon or destroy property in a manner that is detrimental or dangerous to public health or safety or that will infringe on the rights of other persons.