alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 118 (Monday, June 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15328]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-071]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

DATES: June 19, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Guy M. Miller, Patent Counsel, Goddard 
Space Flight Center, Mail Code 750.2, Greenbelt, MD 20771; 301-286-
7351.

NASA Case No. GSC 13,707-1: Dual Antenna Compensating Combiner (DACC);
NASA Case No. GSC 13,874-1: Adhesive Bubble Removal Technique and 
Fixture for Fiber Optic Applications;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,098-1: Microaltimeter;
NASA Case No. GSC 13,966-1: GPS ``Compound Eye'' Attitude Sensor;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,106-1: Automated Liquid Helium Transport System;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,147-1: Process for Producing High Quality 
Optically Polished Surfaces On Bare Aluminum Substrates;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,172-1: Hub Mounted Bending Beam for Shape 
Adjustment of Springback Reflectors;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,205-1: Continuously Variable Planetary 
Transmission(CVPT);
NASA Case No. GSC 14,207-1: Gear Bearings;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,213-1: Estimated Spectrum Adaptive Postfilter 
(ESAP) and the Iterative Prepost Filtering (IPF) Algorithms;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,236-1: MEMS Devices for Spacecraft Thermal Control 
Applications;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,243-1: Autonomous Unified On-Board Orbit and 
Attitude Control System for Satellites;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,339-1: 3-D Interactive Display;
NASA Case No. GSC 14,370-1: Circular Polarization Keying.

    Dated: June 12, 2000.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-15328 Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
#### § 102-192.105 When must we submit our annual mail management report to GSA?

Beginning with FY 2015, the agency's annual mail management report is due on December 1, following the end of the fiscal year.

[80 FR 57103, Sept. 22, 2015]
#### Altoona Trust Company v. Ison, et al. Swift Coal and Timber Company v. Same.

(Decided September 27, 1916.)

Appeals from Letcher Circuit Court.

Interest — Specific Performance. — In an action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land, interest will not be adjudged from the date the purchase price is due where the vendors have failed to make a deed and have themselves remained in possession of the land. Interest will go only from the date the proper deed is tendered by the grantors.

DISHMAN, TINSLEY &' DISHMAN for appellants.

WOOTTON & MORGAN, S. E. BAKER and D. D. FIELDS & DAY for appellees.

Extended Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Modifying Judgment.

In our. original opinion we overlooked the fact that the decree of specific performance in favor of the Swift Coal and Timber.Company provided for the payment of interest op the. purchase .price from the time the purchase, price was. due under the contract. Inasmuch, how*218ever, as the Isons failed to make a deed in conformity to the contract and deliver the land to the Swift Coal and Timber Company, bnt have themselves been in possession of the land, we think the decree in this respect'" is erroneous. Interest will go only from the date the proper deed is tendered by the Isons.

Wherefore, the petition for the extension of the former opinion is granted, with directions to modify the judgment as herein indicated.
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED

April 15, 2021

v No. 351688

Oakland Circuit Court

RONALD MARK DRAUGHN, LC No. 2015

- 256768

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

Before: B ECKERING

, P .J., and F ORT H OOD and R IORDAN , JJ.

B ECKERING , P.J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the result only.

/s/ Jane M. Beckering
#### ESSEX COUNTY RAILROAD COMPANY *v.*TOWN OF LUNENBURGH.

*Costs in Petition for Mandamus.*

A petition for mandamus was defended on several competent grounds. The court considered but one ground, and held that sufficient. *Held,*that defendant was entitled to costs on all the grounds ; but not for the answer, nor for solicitors’ fees for attending the taking of depositions before a magistrate.

Appeal from taxation of costs. It appeared that defendant’s costs were incurred in defence of a petition against its selectmen and treasurer to compel them to issue its bonds pursuant to an act of the Legislature passed in 1867, in aid of the construction of the petitioner’s road. The petition was heard at the General Term, 1876. The defence thereto, as to which testimony was introduced, proceeded upon several grounds, one only of which was considered by the court, but that one was held sufficient. Upon taxation the petitioner claimed that as all the testimony except such as bore upon the question passed upon was irrelevant and inadmissible, costs should not be taxed therefor; that nothing should be allowed for defendant’s attendance on the taking of depositions, nor anything for pleadings ; and that magistrate’s fees for taking testimony should be allowed only for such testimony as was allowed to be taxed. The clerk disallowed costs incurred as to all other grounds of defence than the one considered by the court; from which the defendant appealed.

---; for the defendant.

----, for the petitioner.

By the Court.

The defendant’s costs were incurred in its defence to a petition for a writ of *mandamus,*brought against it by the Essex County Railroad Company, to compel it to issue bonds, which the petitioner claimed the defendant town was bound *251to issue by reason of certain action on its part under the Bonding Act of 1867.

In answer to this petition it was competent for the town to show anything in defence that would excuse it from issuing such bonds. The fact that the court heard the case upon some one of the various grounds suggested, is not conclusive of defendant’s right to costs upon other grounds of defence in good faith relied upon, but which were not noticed or deemed material by the court in the view taken of the case. The clerk therefore erred in disallowing all items except the four specified.

The defendant is entitled to all the items claimed, except solicitor’s fees before magistrate and item of $4.75 for answer.

Taxation of the clerk overruled; costs allowed to defendant as claimed before clerk, except solicitor’s fees before magistrate taking depositions, and item claimed for answer. Defendant to recover costs in this court.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38720-38721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15533]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 00-ACE-8]


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Sheldon, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Sheldon, IA.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 65 FR 20724 is effective on 
0901 UTC, August 10, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on April 18, 2000 (65 FR 20724). The 
FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial 
rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public 
comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse 
comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, 
or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were 
received within the comment period, the regulation would become 
effective on August 10, 2000. No adverse comments were received, and 
thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.


[[Page 38721]]


    Issued in Kansas City, MO on June 7, 2000.
Herman J. Lyons, Jr.,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 00-15533 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DEMETRIUS BARBOUR, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,


### v. Civil ActionNo. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED JUN 2 62012 Clerk, U.S. District &Bankruptcy Courts tor the District of Columbia 

# 12 1049

This matter is before the Court onplaintiffs application to proceed informapauperis and hispro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint. Itappears that plaintiffchallenges the Social Security Administration's decision to withhold $25.00 from each monthly payment ofbenefits in orderto recover amounts overpaidto him in years past. The matter is not properly before the Court, however, because it does not appear that plaintiffhas exhausted his administrative remedies priorto filing this lawsuit. "[F]inal SSA decisions eligible forjudicial review follow four steps ofan administrative review process: (1) an initial determination; (2) a reconsideration determination; (3) a hearing before an ALJ; and (4) review by the Appeals Council." Beattie v. Astrue, _F. Supp. 2d _,_, 2012 WL 628346, at *4 (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 2012) (citation omitted). In other words, only "after any final decision by the Commissioner ofSocial Security made after a hearing to which he is a party" may a plaintiffseekjudicial review in a federal district court. 42 U.S.C. §405(g). The 

### 1complaint sets forth no facts from whichthe Court could conclude that waiver ofthe exhaustion requirement is warranted: where "(1) the issue raised is entirely collateral to a claim for payment; (2) plaintiffs showthey would be irreparably injured were the exhaustion requirement enforced against them; [or] (3) exhaustion would be futile." Hall v. Sebelius, 689 F. Supp. 2d 10, 18 (D.D.C. 2009) (citations omitted). The complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. See, e.g., Fordv. Astrue, 808 F. Supp. 2d 150, 153 (D.D.C. 2011) (dismissing complaintwhere plaintiff"has only completedthe first two steps ofthe four-step SSA administrative-reviewprocess"); see also Maiden v. Barnhart, 450 F. Supp. 2d 1, 3-4 (D.D.C. 2006) (finding that denial ofuntimelyrequest for hearing is not a final decision for exhaustion purposes). An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

# [/~fL. 

# j 

# J/**~L** United States District Judge

2
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Vsource, Inc.
(the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such
report.


                                              By:   /s/  Phillip E. Kelly
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                        Phillip E. Kelly
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                  (Principal Executive Officer)


                                              By:   /s/  Dennis M. Smith
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                         Dennis M. Smith
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: April 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                           4,420
<SECURITIES>                                     6,276
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                       997
<INVENTORY>                                     53,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,991
<PP&E>                                         107,445
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,871
<BONDS>                                        160,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,995
<COMMON>                                         1,825
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,093
<SALES>                                        265,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               265,036
<CGS>                                          232,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (127)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                       449
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,335
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,213)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,856)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,401)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DUKE
REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES' DECEMBER 31, 1996 CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,550)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,192
<PP&E>                                       1,290,676
<DEPRECIATION>                                (82,207)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,362,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,935
<BONDS>                                        525,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     769,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,362,399
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               187,806
<CGS>                                           94,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             58,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    58,713
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is _____________________________________.

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the 

FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC,

d/b/a Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively 

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River 

and the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is 

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein 

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by 

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Dated ______________, 2023. Signed:_________________________

Printed Name:____________________

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: _________________________________ Tel No.:___________________________

_________________________________ Email: ____________________________

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156 / brian@fairlawattorney.com

TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1 Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 176-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2023 Page 1 of 1
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5396

To amend section 81 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to amend the definition

of a foreign trade zone operator, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 2000

Mr. DIAZ-BALART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend section 81 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to amend

the definition of a foreign trade zone operator, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF A FOREIGN TRADE ZONE OPER4 ATOR.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 81a of the Tariff Act of

6 1930 is amended by striking the ‘‘.’’ in the last line after

7 the word ‘‘chapter’’ in (1) and inserting thereafter:

8 ‘‘(j) The term operator means any private corporation

9 which has contracted with a grantee for the exclusive au10 thority to establish, operate, and maintain a general pur-
2

HR 5396 IH

1 pose foreign trade zone located E of longitude 81 W and

2 S of latitude 26 N.’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment

5 of this Act, and shall apply to any taxable event on or

6 after such date.

7 SEC. 2. ASSESSMENT OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 81n is amended by adding

9 after the period in the last line the following: ‘‘An operator

10 defined in subsection (j) shall not be subject to any real

11 property tax authorized by the state in which the zone is

12 located.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment

15 of this Act, and shall apply to any taxable event on or

16 after such date.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF GRANITE  CLIFFS  INCORPORATED  AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE
RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>