alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: George Tsiolis [mailto:gtsiolis@nj.rr.com]

Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:26 AM

To: Withey, Charlotte

Cc: Nudd, Gregory; Webb, Thomas; McKaughan, Colleen; 'Giff, Jennifer'; 'Martz, Verle'; 'Lindsay, Brett' Subject: RE: Followup to November 14 Call Between SRPMIC, Phoenix Cement and EPA Importance: High

Dear Charlotte,

Thank you again for providing to SRPMIC and PCC the draft regulatory text for the portion of the RHR FIP proposal that would concern PCC. SRPMIC and

PCC are st ill reviewing the text.

During our November 14, 2013 conference call, the EPA had committed also to send to SRPMIC and PCC a copy of the EPA’s latest cost analysis for the installation of additional NOx controls at PCC, and to have a follow

- up telephone discussion about the cost analysis. We understood that the latest cost analysis is different from the cost analysis in the October 2012 contractor report which Colleen provided to PCC on November 6, 2012.

SRPMIC and PCC would need to base their responsi ve submittal of additional information to the EPA not only on the draft regulatory text, but also on the EPA’s latest cost analysis. This is because the additional information that SRPMIC

PCC would submit, if appropriate, would be primarily financial, tho ugh informed by the regulatory text.

Please send the EPA’s latest cost analysis to Brett Lindsay, copied on this e

mail, and please let’s arrange for Gregory Nudd and Brett to have the telephone discussion regarding the cost analysis as soon as possible. This way, SRPMIC and PCC will be able to make their responsive submittal in a timely fashion.

I cannot be sure that SRPMIC

- PCC will be able to meet your (new) December 17

timeframe. Hopefully that would not stop the EPA from completing its tribal

consul tation in a way that allows SRPMIC

- PCC to submit information based on both the EPA’s cost analysis and the regulatory text and materially factors

SRPMIC

- PCC’s submittal into the development of the FIP proposal.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesi tate to let us know. Thank you.

Best regards,

George A. Tsiolis

Counsel to SRPMIC

- PCCGeorge A. Tsiolis Attorney at Law 351 Lydecker Street Englewood, New Jersey 07631

Cell: 602

- 319

- 4021

Office: 201

- 408

- 4256

Fax: 201

- 408

- 4622

Email: gtsiolis@nj.rr.com

Web: www.gtsiolis.com

The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above, and may be privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communic ation is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone (602

- 319

- 4021), and delete the original message. Thank you.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00436

- CR

MARK STUYVESANT

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 14

- CR

- 4408

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. December 29, 2016
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

## Water Analysis
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 4/10/2012 Sample Number: 121423-001 Date Collected:03/28/2012 08:30 Date Received:3/28/2012 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 371 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 04/10/2012 10:49 

### Sample Number: 121423-002 Date Collected:03/28/2012 08:30 Date Received:3/28/2012 

## 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 17.6 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 04/10/2012 10:54 

### Sample Number: 121423-003 Date Collected:03/28/2012 08:30 Date Received:3/28/2012 

## Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 0.8 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 04/10/2012 10:59

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 121423 Page 1 of 1
AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                           NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED        THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
                                       ------------------------      -----------------------
                                        March 2,       March 3,       March 2,      March 3,
                                          2002           2001           2002          2001
                                       ---------      ---------      ---------      --------
<S>                                    <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Net income (loss) for computing
  income (loss) per common share       $ (74,444)     $ (12,494)     $(253,893)     $  6,513
                                       =========      =========      =========      ========

Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding
   during each period                    826,403        834,081        826,247       833,520
                                       =========      =========      =========      ========

Net income (loss) per common share     $  (0.090)     $  (0.015)     $  (0.307)     $  0.008
                                       =========      =========      =========      ========
</TABLE>
#### § 102-36.455 How do we report excess shelf-life items?

You must identify the property as shelf-life items by “SL”, indicate the expiration date, whether the date is the original or an extended date, and if the date is further extendable. GSA may adjust the screening period based on re-use potential and the remaining useful shelf life.
EXHIBIT  23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

The  Board  of  Directors
Endocare,  Inc.

We  consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-30405)  on  Form  S-8 of Endocare, Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2001
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Endocare, Inc. as of December 31,
2000  and  1999,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,
shareholders'  equity  (deficiency)  and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year  period  ended  December  31,  2000,  and the related schedule, which
report  appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Endocare,
Inc.

KPMG  LLP

Orange  County,  California
March  30,  2001
<Page>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY




       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact,
and each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue hereof.






                                            /s/ Donald E. Steen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Donald E. Steen
Matthew Rodriquez Secret ary for Environment al Prot ection April 23, 2015 

# Air Resources Board Mary D. Nichols, Chairman

1001 I Street • P . O . Bo x 2815 Sacramento , Cal ifornia 958 12 • www . arb . ca . gov

Matthew Lakin , Ph . D., Manager Air Planning Office , Region 9 U . S . Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco , California 94105 Dear Dr . Lakin : Edmund G . Brown Jr. Go vern o r

Per your request , the Air Resources Board (ARB) is providing the U . S . Environmental Protection Agency with information regarding the impacts of amendments to the Regulation for In-Use On - Road Diesel - Fueled Vehicles (Truck and Bus Regulation) on the 2016 Rate of Progress (ROP) and 2017 attainment year in the San Joaquin Valley 1-hour Ozone Plan (Plan) . Analysis by ARB staff indicates that the temporary loss of benefits of 5 tons per day oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions due to the Truck and Bus Regulation amendments can be accommodated in the 2016 ROP and the attainment demonstration. In the Plan , Table 4-2 documents that the loss can be accommodated in the 2016 ROP demonstration . Also , the Plan specifies that the 2017 1 - hour ozone modeled design value is 119 .3 parts per billion (ppb) , well below the level of the 1 - hour ozone standard of 124 ppb. The difference between the level of the standard and the modeled design value can accommodate the temporary increase in NOx emissions. Supporting analysis regarding the attainment demonstration is provided in the enclosure with this letter . If you have any questions , please contact me at (916) 324-7163 or at Sylvia.Vanderspek@a rb.ca . gov .

lvia Vanderspek, Chief A i r Quality Planning Bran c h Enclosure

The en ergy ch all enge f ac

ing Ca l if

ornia is real. Every Cali fornian needs to t ak

e immedia t e act ion to reduce energy consump ti on. For a list ofsimple way s yo u can reduce demand and cut yo ur energy costs , see our website : htt p ://www . a rb . ca . qov . C a l i f o rni a En vironm e nta l Protec tion Ag e n cy Printed on Recycled PaperMatthew Lakin, Ph . D. April 23 , 2015 Page 2 bee: Daniel Whitney, EO Karen Magliano, AQPSD Webster Tasat, AQPSD Elizabeth Melgoza, AQPSD External bee: (via email with enclosure) John Ungvarsky, U . S . EPA , Region 9 , Ungvarsky.John@epamail.epa . gov Doris Lo, U.S. EPA, Region 9 , Lo . Doris@epamail.epa.gov Anita Lee , U . S. EPA , Region 9, Lee.Anita@epa.gov EO Chron AQPSD Chron SIP Library Assignment #9445 X:\SJV 2013 1-hour Ozone Plan\Region 9 TnB Amendments lmpaet

_ EM.doex
**Exhibit 23.(A)**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Directors and 

Stockholders of PainCare Holdings, Inc. 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of PainCare Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the yearthen ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtainreasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includesassessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of PainCareHoldings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectivenessof PainCare Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations ofthe Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated May 12, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting. 

**Beemer, Pricher, Kuehnhackl & Heidbrink, P.A.**

Winter Park, Florida 

May 12, 2006
#### § 101-30.101-12 Item identification data.

*Item identification data* means recorded data which are used to differentiate an item from all other items. Item identification data are composed of data that describe the essential physical characteristics of the item and reference data that relate the item to other identifying media (such as manufacturers' part numbers, identified blueprints, suppliers' catalogs, or the like).

[41 FR 11308, Mar. 18, 1976]
#### § 102-37.165 Do plans or major amendments require public notice?

Yes, proposed plans and major amendments to existing plans require general notice to the public for comment. A State must publish a general notice of the plan or amendment at least 60 calendar days in advance of filing the proposal with GSA and provide interested parties at least 30 calendar days to submit comments before filing the proposal.
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:14 AM

To: 'Raju Bisht'

Cc: Gutierrez, Roberto

Subject: Radio public service announcements for NGS part 71 permit

Attachments: AA5076.mp3; AA5077.mp3

Hi Raju,

I was forwarded the attached audio files for radio public service announcements made for the NGS part 71 permit

renewal. We are considering doing the same for a PSD permit that will be issued by our office. Any leads on how it was

done or contacts for doing this would be helpful.

We were provided the following radio stations previously, and it was suggested to us to use the stations highlighted in

yellow. Any other info you can provide with respect to this would also be helpful.

Thanks.



### http://radio-locator.com/

There are 11 radio stations that may be within distant listening range of

84510 (Aneth, Utah). (37° 12' 53" N, 109° 17' 54" W)

Info Call Sign Frequency Dist./Signal City School Format

KRMH 89.7 FM 17.9 mi. Red Mesa, AZ Red Mesa High

School Grade School (K-12)

KZET 90.5 FM 27.0 mi. Cortez, CO Variety

KBDX 92.7 FM 44.1 mi. Blanding, UT Oldies

KKDC 93.3 FM 45.9 mi. Dolores, CO Rock

KISZ 97.9 FM 63.9 mi. Cortez, CO Country

KRTZ 98.7 FM 27.0 mi. Cortez, CO Adult Contemporary

KLLV 550 AM 66.9 mi. Breen, CO Religious

KTNN 660 AM 91.5 mi. Window Rock, AZ Country

KVFC 740 AM 42.6 mi. Cortez, CO News/Talk

KKOB 770 AM 204.2 mi. Albuquerque, NM News/Talk

KNDN 960 AM 67.8 mi. Farmington, NM Ethnic

very weak signal weak signal moderate signal strong signal very strong signal

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,047
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,660
<INVENTORY>                                     34,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,962
<PP&E>                                         130,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 347,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,402
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,975
<COMMON>                                         3,201
<OTHER-SE>                                    (40,816)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   347,345
<SALES>                                        103,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               204,685
<CGS>                                           58,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,524
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       920
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (42,033)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (76,889)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.41)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 102-118.525 What are my agency's responsibilities for verifying the correct amount of transportation charges?

Your agency's employees are responsible for diligently verifying the correct amount of transportation charges prior to payment (31 U.S.C. 3527).
§ 102-71.10 How are these policies organized? GSA has divided its real property policies into the following functional areas: ( a ) Delegation of authority.
( b ) Real estate acquisition.
( c ) Facility management.
( d ) Real property disposal.
( e ) Design and construction.
( f ) Art-in-architecture.
( g ) Historic preservation.
( h ) Assignment and utilization of space.
( i ) Safety and environmental management.
( j ) Security.
( k ) Utility services.
( l ) Location of space.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 181-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/03/2023 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8580

ROY ANTHONY SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN A. HOLLAND, JR., M.D.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-94-819)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Anthony Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Eugene Ornoff, PENDER

& COWARD, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal

period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an

extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day

period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to

relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established

by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v.

Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting

United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district

court entered its order on May 22, 1995; Appellant's notice of

appeal was filed on Dec. 19, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives

this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore

grant Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal. We deny Appellant's

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHBIT 99.1

                                 [SUNBEAM LOGO]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELASE:


                        SUNBEAM WILL EXCEED NEW PRODUCTS
                                 GOAL FOR 1997

DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA OCTOBER 13, 1997 - Sunbeam Corporation (NYSE: SOC)
announced today that it will exceed its original goal for new product
introductions in 1997. "We originally set out to introduce 42 new international
products and 30 new U.S. products as a means to rapidly expand our international
breadth of product lines and to provide product differentiation within the U.S.
product lines", said Al Dunlap, Sunbeam's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Dunlap continued, "As a result of our accelerated product development cycle
and our ability to rapidly commercialize U.S. products for international use, we
now expect to introduce 54 new international products and 35 new U.S. products
in 1997."

Mr. Dunlap said, "Our new product development process focuses on fixing chronic
consumer complaints and incorporates a tremendous amount of design concurrency
to aid in accelerating products to market. Additionally, all of our U.S. new
products are now designed for the global market and for ease of manufacturing."
The Company expects new products will contribute over $100 million in additional
revenue in 1997.

Last week in New York City, the Company unveiled two new highly differentiated
products, the Allergysmart/tm/ air purification and the Freshsource/tm/ water
purification products. Mr. Dunlap said, "These two new products represent the
very best of the "new" Sunbeam. We were able to bring these products to market
in eight months, from ideation to production, and they both solve the most
significant consumer complaints associated with current products in the
marketplace." Additionally, Mr. Dunlap discussed an arepa maker which was
introduced in Venezuela during the third quarter, "Arepa's are a food staple in
many parts of South and Central America, and we redesigned and modified our
current sandwich maker to dramaticallly reduce the amount of time needed to
prepare an arepa. Due to its success, we plan on introducing the arepa maker in
North America in 1998 to take advantage of ethnic food trends throughout the
United States."

Sunbeam Corporation is a leading consumer products company that designs,
manufactures and markets, nationally and internationally, a diverse portfolio of
brand name products. The Company's Sunbeam/r/ and Oster/r/ brands have been
household names for generations, both domestically and abroad, and the Company
is a market leader in many of its product categories.


                         *****************************

Contact:       Media:                             Investors:
               Nicole Reilly                      Rich Goudis
               (212)885-0353                      (561)243-2100