alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 601.112 Review of adverse decisions.

Any party may seek review of an adverse decision of the Board of Contract Appeals in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or in any other appropriate forum.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAVONTA RYANS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1915

[ May 10, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Cheryl Caracuzzo , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502016CF004146AXXXMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jessica A. De Vera, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B.

Hernandez, Assistant At torney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-30731

Summary Calendar

 

CORBY D. COOVER; MARIA COOVER;

BRYANA COOVER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Louisiana

(USDC No. 99-CV-1920)

_______________________________________________________

December 7, 2000

Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sgt. Corby Coover, his wife Maria Coover, and his daughter Bryana Coover

appeal from summary judgment on their claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act,
2

ch. 753, 60 Stat. 842 (1946) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 28

U.S.C.). 

Because Sgt. Coover was injured (1) while on active duty, (2) while

performing military duties, and (3) at Fort Polk, the district court correctly applied

the Feres doctrine. See United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681, 686-88 (1987);

Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 146 (1950). Under the law and holding of the

Supreme Court, the suit of the Coovers is barred.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5630 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                      December 6 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
5630) entitled ``An Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 
2001 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United 
States Government, the Community Management Account, and the Central 
Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other 
purposes.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)Page 3, in the table of contents, strike out

[Sec. 501. Contracting authority for the National Reconnaissance 
                            Office.]

(2)Page 3, in the table of contents, strike out

[502]
and insert:

501

(3)Page 3, in the table of contents, strike out

[503]
and insert:

502

(4)Page 48, strike out lines 4 through 16

(5)Page 48, line 17, strike out [502] and insert: 501

(6)Page 49, line 7, strike out [503] and insert: 502

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5630

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN PART I, ITEM 1 FOR FORM 10-Q DATED MARCH 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              68
<SECURITIES>                                        69
<RECEIVABLES>                                      171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4
<INVENTORY>                                         56
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   403
<PP&E>                                             502
<DEPRECIATION>                                     130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              105
<BONDS>                                            928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,666
<SALES>                                             96
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   186
<CGS>                                               34
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       78
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      9
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 1 of 7
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 3 of 7
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 4 of 7
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 5 of 7
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 6 of 7
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 7 of 7
Agenda

January 29, 2016

9:00 – 10:00 a.m.

1800 G Street, Conference Room 1

RMP Interagency Review

1. Third Party Audits

2. Incident Investigation/Root Cause

3. STAA/IST

4. LEPC Disclosure/Public Meetings

5. Public Disclosure
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5520

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility located in

Iron Mountain, Michigan, as the ‘‘Oscar G. Johnson Department of

Veterans Affairs Medical Facility’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 2000

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility

located in Iron Mountain, Michigan, as the ‘‘Oscar G.

Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

4 MEDICAL FACILITY, IRON MOUNTAIN, MICHI5 GAN.

6 The Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility

7 located in Iron Mountain, Michigan, shall after the date

8 of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as
2

•HR 5520 IH

1 the ‘‘Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs

2 Medical Facility’’. Any reference to such medical facility

3 in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other

4 paper of the United States shall be considered to be a ref5 erence to the Oscar G. Johnson Department of Veterans

6 Affairs Medical Facility.

Æ
UM TED STATESDISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERNDISTRICT 9FFLORIDA

CASE NO.22-80185-CR-M IDDLEBROOK S

UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA

V.

ELIZABETH GENNA SUAREA

i f/k/a(dElizabethM irsonSuit,''

Defendant.

VERDICT

Count1

W e,the Jury,fmd theDefendant,Elizabeth Germa Suarez,asto Count 1 of the

Tnformation,wizeâaudinviolationof18U.S.C.j1343:

Guilty

x otGuilty

Count2

W e,the Jury,fm d the Defendant,Elizabeth Gezma Suarez,asto Cotmt2 of the

Information,wirefzaudinviolationof18U.S.C.j1343:

Ouilty

NotGuilty

Count3

W e,the Jury,fmd the Defendant,Elizabeth Genna Suarez,asto Count3 ofthe

Jnformation,wirefzaudin'violationof18U.S.C.j1343:

O1zilty

.

- '--...

A .w xotGuijty

Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2023 Page 1 of 2
Count4

W e,the Jury,find the Defendant,Elizabeth Genna Suarez,asto Count4 ofthe

Information,wirefraudinviolationof18U.S.C.j1343:

,,.- Guilty

i NotGuilty i

1

:

! SO SAY W E AT,L.

SignedanddgtedattheUnitedStatesCourthouse,W estPalm Beach,Floridw

,'Iap's /.dayof .7,-/..,g-,2023.

f .'e

Foreperson'sSignature Foreperson'sPzintedN anle

Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2023 Page 2 of 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5470

To provide for the opposition of the United States to the provision of any

resources or assistance by the International Monetary Fund to the Palestinian Authority until the Secretary of State certifies that Israel and

the Palestinian Authority have signed an agreement on borders and

security arrangements for Israel and a Palestinian state.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 2000

Mr. SAXTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To provide for the opposition of the United States to the

provision of any resources or assistance by the International Monetary Fund to the Palestinian Authority

until the Secretary of State certifies that Israel and

the Palestinian Authority have signed an agreement on

borders and security arrangements for Israel and a Palestinian state.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5470 IH

1 SECTION 1. OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO THE

2 PROVISION OF ANY RESOURCES OR ASSIST3 ANCE BY THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY

4 FUND TO THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY

5 UNTIL ISRAEL AND THE PALESTINIAN AU6 THORITY AGREE ON BORDERS AND SECU7 RITY ARRANGEMENTS.

8 The Bretton Woods Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286–

9 286nn) is amended by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘SEC. 63. OPPOSITION OF THE UNITED STATES TO THE

11 PROVISION OF ANY RESOURCES OR ASSIST12 ANCE BY THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY

13 FUND TO THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY

14 UNTIL ISRAEL AND THE PALESTINIAN AU15 THORITY AGREE ON BORDERS AND SECU16 RITY ARRANGEMENTS.

17 ‘‘The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the

18 United States Executive Director at the Fund to use the

19 voice, vote, and influence of the United States to oppose

20 the provision of any resources or assistance by the Fund

21 to the Palestinian Authority, until the Secretary of State

22 certifies to the Congress that Israel and the Palestinian

23 Authority have signed an agreement on borders and secu24 rity arrangements for Israel and a Palestinian state.’’.

Æ
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 0:22-cv-62099-GAYLES/STRAUSS

DWIGHT PRUDE,

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant. 

________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss’s Report and 

Recommendation (the “Report”) [ECF No. 19]. On November 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed a Complaint 

seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the 

“Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff’s entitlement to disability benefits. [ECF No. 1]. The matter 

was referred to Judge Strauss pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) for a ruling on all pretrial, nondispositive motions and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive motions. [ECF No. 2].

On September 15, 2023, Judge Strauss issued his Report recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment [ECF No. 15] be denied, the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

[ECF No. 17] be granted, and that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed. Plaintiff has timely 

objected to the Report. [ECF No. 20].

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which 

objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings 

Case 0:22-cv-62099-DPG Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see 

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific 

objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint 

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 

208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). 

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record and agrees with Judge Strauss’s

well-reasoned analysis and recommendation that the Commissioner’s decision should be 

affirmed. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) Judge Strauss’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19] is AFFIRMED AND 

ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order by reference.

(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 15] is DENIED.

(3) The Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 17] is 

GRANTED.

(4) The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 

(5) This action is CLOSED for administrative purposes.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 27th day of October, 2023. 

________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 0:22-cv-62099-DPG Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2023 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Final environmental impactstatement for the Coconino National Forest Service land and resource managementplan : Coconino, Gila, and Yavapai Counties, Arizona [electronic resource].**
 
I|IIA|IIb|III|iV
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.105/2:MB-R 3-04-32/V.1-4

CGP systemNumber:001062505
 
July 18, 2018
#### § 102-41.100 What information do we provide when reporting voluntarily abandoned personal property to GSA?

When reporting voluntarily abandoned personal property to GSA, you must provide a description and location of the property, and annotate that the property was voluntarily abandoned.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 118 (Monday, June 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15519]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207.

TIME AND DATE:  Friday, June 23, 2000, 10:00 a.m.

LOCATION: Room 420, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:   

Oral Drugs Switched From Prescription to Over the Counter (OTC) Status

    The Commission will consider the staff's recommendation to propose 
that child-resistant packaging requirements for oral prescription drugs 
continue when such drugs are granted over-the-counter (OTC) status by 
the Food and Drug Administration.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: June 15, 2000.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15519 Filed 6-15-00; 2:27 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
H. R. 642

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To redesignate the Federal building located at 701 South Santa Fe Avenue in

Compton, California, and known as the Compton Main Post Office, as the ‘‘Mervyn

Malcolm Dymally Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 701 South Santa Fe Avenue

in Compton, California, and known as the Compton Main Post

Office, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Mervyn Malcolm

Dymally Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mervyn

Malcolm Dymally Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information excerpted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended 09/30/95.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          13,388
<SECURITIES>                                    21,173
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,709
<PP&E>                                          80,937
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,446
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        133
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,705
<SALES>                                              3
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,541
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,889)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,418)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,418)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 535

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections to a map relating

to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections

to a map relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAP.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

6 shall make such corrections to the map described in sub7 section (b) as are necessary to move on that map the

8 boundary of the otherwise protected area (as defined in

9 section 12 of the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of

10 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3503 note; Public Law 101–591)) to the
2

•HR 535 IH

1 Cape Henlopen State Park boundary to the extent

2 necessary—

3 (1) to exclude from the otherwise protected area

4 the adjacent property leased, as of the date of enact5 ment of this Act, by the Barcroft Company and

6 Cape Shores Associates (which are privately held

7 corporations under the law of the State of Dela8 ware); and

9 (2) to include in the otherwise protected area

10 the northwestern corner of Cape Henlopen State

11 Park seaward of the Lewes and Rehoboth Canal.

12 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map described in this

13 subsection is the map that is included in a set of maps

14 entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’, dated Octo15 ber 24, 1990, as revised October 15, 1992, and that re16 lates to the unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources System

17 entitled ‘‘Cape Henlopen Unit DE–03P’’.

Æ
§ 5.46 Auxiliary patrol ensign. ( a ) *Description.* The field of the Auxiliary patrol ensign is white. A medium blue (Coast Guard blue) Coast Guard Auxiliary emblem is centered on a broad diagonal red (Coast Guard red) slash which is at a 70 degree angle, rising toward the hoist. The red (Coast Guard red) slash is followed, away from the hoist, by two narrow, parallel stripes—first a white stripe, and then a medium blue (Coast Guard blue) stripe. The entire design is centered on the ensign.
( b ) *Display.* Vessels that have been accepted as facilities shall display the Auxiliary patrol ensign when on patrol, whether or not the vessel is underway. The Auxiliary patrol ensign must be displayed at the mast head or from the most conspicuous hoist.