alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the periodic report of Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, Craig T. Davenport, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Date: March 15, 2005
    /s/ Craig T. DavenportCraig T. DavenportChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5059 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5059

   To provide for a delayed effective date for the implementation of 
regulations requiring audible warnings at highway-rail grade crossings, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

Mr. Lipinski, (for himself, Mr. Hastert, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Blagojevich, 
 Mr. Costello, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Hyde, Mr. LaHood, 
  Mr. Phelps, Mr. Porter, Mr. Rush, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Weller, and Mr. 
   Roemer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a delayed effective date for the implementation of 
regulations requiring audible warnings at highway-rail grade crossings, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 20153(j) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``365th day'' and inserting ``expiration of 10 years''.

SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTARY SAFETY MEASURES.

    Section 20153(a)(3) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``as where adequate median barriers prevent 
        movement around''; and
            (2) by striking ``flashing lights with gates that do not 
        completely block travel over the line of railroad,''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11




                      SUNBEAM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CALCULATIONS OF EARNINGS
                           PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED         SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                               -----------------------   ----------------------
                                                               JUNE 30,     JUNE 29,     JUNE 30,     JUNE 29,
                                                                1996         1997         1996         1997
                                                               ----------   ----------   ----------   ---------
                                                                     (UNAUDITED)              (UNAUDITED)
<S>                                                            <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Net earnings applicable to common shareholders  ............     $ 7,205      $26,234      $24,566    $33,082
                                                                ========     ========     ========    ========
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding  ......      82,069       84,815       82,026     84,501
 Add:
   Common shares issuable for exercise of options, net of
     shares assumed to have been acquired with proceeds
     therefrom .............................................         380        2,731          455      2,820
                                                                --------     --------     --------    --------
Number of shares applicable to earnings per
 share calculation   .......................................      82,449       87,546       82,481     87,321
                                                                ========     ========     ========    ========
Earnings per share of common stock  ........................     $   .09      $   .30      $   .30    $   .38
</TABLE>
§ 102-74.420 What is the policy concerning photographs for news, advertising or commercial purposes? Except where security regulations, rules, orders, or directives apply or a Federal court order or rule prohibits it, persons entering in or on Federal property may take photographs of— ( a ) Space occupied by a tenant agency for non-commercial purposes only with the permission of the occupying agency concerned;
( b ) Space occupied by a tenant agency for commercial purposes only with written permission of an authorized official of the occupying agency concerned; and
( c ) Building entrances, lobbies, foyers, corridors, or auditoriums for news purposes.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                          AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                                         NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

                                                 EXHIBIT 11


                                                    THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED         THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
                                              ------------------------------  ------------------------------
                                               February 26,    February 28,    February 26,    February 28,
                                                   2005            2004            2005            2004
                                              --------------  --------------  --------------  --------------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>

Net loss for computing loss per common share  $    (150,106)  $     (41,738)  $    (252,292)  $     (84,738)
                                              ==============  ==============  ==============  ==============


Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding during each period                    806,666         814,919         807,424         815,082
                                              ==============  ==============  ==============  ==============


Net loss per common share                     $      (0.186)  $      (0.051)  $      (0.312)  $      (0.104)
                                              ==============  ==============  ==============  ==============
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30956

Summary Calendar

 

BLONG LOR,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOHN B. Z. CAPLINGER, District Director,

Immigration and Naturalization Serv.,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-513

- - - - - - - - - -

March 19, 1998

Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6. PENDING MOTION DENIED.
CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Richard Govatski, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NMXS.com, Inc.



2.   Based on my knowledge, this amended yearly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended yearly report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended yearly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended yearly report;



4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the a registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended yearly report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended yearly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



(c) presented in this amended yearly report my conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date





5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and



(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.   I have indicated in this amended yearly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated: April 17, 2007



/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski

Chief Executive Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



            We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in the  registration
statement of Atlantic  International  Entertainment,  Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No.
033-21501)  of  our  report  dated  February  6,  1999,  on  our  audits  of the
consolidated financial statements of Atlantic International Entertainment,  Ltd.
as of December 31, 1998 and for the two years in the period  ended  December 31,
1998, which report it included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.



                                              /s/ Moore Stephens, P.C.
                                              Moore Stephens, P.C.
                                              Certified Public Accountants



Cranford, New Jersey
May 10, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         643,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,980,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,247,812
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,487,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,247,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      9,235,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,670,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,247,737
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,092,177
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,361,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,379,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             188,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                162,522
<INCOME-TAX>                                    69,226
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,296
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Chen Wang, certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the American Express Credit Account Master Trust (the “Exchange Act periodicreports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based onmy knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreementsin all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities andtheir related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, Ihave reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon. 

 
Date: March 21, 2024By: 
/s/ Chen Wang
Name: Chen WangTitle: President, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation III LLC (Senior officer in charge of securitization)**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61672-CIV-ALTMAN

DEAN BAKER,

Petitioner,

vs.

U.S. PROBATION OFFICER,

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

In his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the Petitioner challenges

the Bureau of Prisons’s alleged failure to properly calculate and apply earned time credits to his term 

of supervised release. See Petition [ECF No. 1] at 6. We therefore ORDER AND ADJUDGE as 

follows:

1. Assuming that counsel for the Government (“the Respondent”) has not already done 

so, within one week from the date of this Order, the Respondent shall file a written Notice, which 

shall provide:

a) the name and address of the attorney within the United States 

Attorney’s Office to whom this case has been assigned; and

b) documentation showing that this attorney has requested any records 

that might be relevant to the Petitioner’s claims.

2. By October 7, 2022, the Respondent shall file a Response Memorandum of fact and 

law, explaining exactly why the Petition should not be granted. The Response Memorandum must

address all procedural and merits-based issues pertinent to the Petitioner’s claim(s). In doing so, the 

Response Memorandum must be accompanied by a comprehensive appendix, which shall include 

copies of all relevant exhibits. The Respondent shall file the Response, the appendix, and its exhibits

Case 0:22-cv-61672-RKA Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

simultaneously. If the Respondent can’t do this simultaneously, then it shall file a Motion for 

Extension of Time, in which it shall explain precisely why an extension is necessary.

2. Indeed, any motion for an extension of time must explain precisely why the extension 

is necessary. So, for instance, any motion seeking an extension of time on the ground that the 

Respondent was unable to procure the necessary immigration records must document both (1) the 

Respondent’s timely request for the documents and (2) the relevant court’s explanation as to why the 

records are missing. Any such motion must also set forth the day on which the Respondent expects to 

receive such records.

3. The Respondent must give the Petitioner complete copies of any documents it filed in 

support of its Response.

4. The Petitioner need not file a Reply. But, if the Petitioner does reply, the Petitioner 

must do so within fifteen days from the day on which the Respondent filed its Response. Any reply 

must comply with the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida and may not exceed ten pages

in length.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 9th day of September 2022.

 _________________________________

ROY K. ALTMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Dean Baker, pro se

Noticing 2241/Bivens U.S. Attorney

Email: usafls-2255@usdoj.gov

Case 0:22-cv-61672-RKA Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3.25-05 Sector Delaware Bay Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

Sector Delaware Bay's office is located in Philadelphia, PA. The boundaries of Sector Delaware Bay's Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone start near the New Jersey coast at latitude 40°18′00′′ N, longitude 73°58′40′′ W, proceeding west to latitude 40°18′00′′ N, longitude 74°30′30′′ W, thence north-northwest to the junction of the New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania boundaries near Tristate at latitude 41°21′27′′ N, longitude 74°41′42′′ W; thence northwest along the east bank of the Delaware River to latitude 42°00′00′′ N, longitude 75°21′28′′ W; thence west along the New York-Pennsylvania boundary to latitude 42°00′00′′ N, longitude 78°54′58′′ W; thence south to latitude 41°00′00′′ N, longitude 78°54′58′′ W; thence west to latitude 41°00′00′′ N, longitude 79°00′00′′ W; thence south to the Pennsylvania-Maryland boundary at latitude 39°43′22′′ N, longitude 79°00′00′′ W; thence east to the intersection of the Maryland-Delaware boundary at latitude 39°43′22′′ N, longitude 75°47′17′′ W; thence south along the Maryland-Delaware boundary to latitude 38°27′37′′ N, longitude 75°41′35′′ W and east along the Maryland-Delaware boundary to and including Fenwick Island Light at latitude 38°27′03′′ N, longitude 75°02′55′′ W. The offshore boundary starts at Fenwick Island Light and proceeds east to a point at latitude 38°26′25′′ N, longitude 74°26′46′′ W; thence southeast to latitude 37°19′14′′ N, longitude 72°13′13′′ W; thence east to the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 37°19′14′′ N, longitude 71°02′54′′ W; thence northeast along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 37°56′50′′ N, longitude 69°18′15′′ W; thence northwest to latitude 38°28′00′′ N, longitude 70°11′00′′ W; thence northwest to a point near the New Jersey coast at latitude 40°18′00′′ N, longitude 73°58′40′′ W.

[USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36320, July 2, 2007]
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Teliphone Corp., (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
Metrakos, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  TELIPHONE
CORP.
 By:
      /s/ George MetrakosGeorge
      MetrakosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerDecember
      19, 2008
#### § 102-76.45 What procedures must Federal agencies follow to implement the requirements of NEPA?

Federal agencies must follow the procedures identified in the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA implementing regulations, 40 CFR 1500-1508. In addition, Federal agencies must follow the standards that they have promulgated to implement CEQ's regulations.
#### § 101-30.404-1 Consolidation of supply support requests.

Requests for supply support should be consolidated in one focal point within each agency or activity. On the basis of the total consolidated agency or activity requirement; i.e., annual demand, GSA can determine the most economical and efficient method of supply support.

[43 FR 42257, Sept. 20, 1978]