I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent required for ( **name** ) to be

able to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System even though ( **he or**  **she** ) exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted, I request that any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Miracle J is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)( B) t o the extent necessary to allow Miracle to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system during use of that child restraint system aboard an aircraft. I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we see k relief is Section 121.311 Seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses.

My **daughter** is __11___ year’s old, weighs _ 84 ____ pounds, and is __53.5

____ inches tall. My **daughter** ’s physical condition is as follows my daughter is unable to hold her upper body up without assistance, unable to bear weight, is a child with cerebral palsy, spastic, and quadriplegic. As a result of **her** physical condition, **she** needs the support and security provided by an FAA Approved Child Restraint, but because of **her** weight is incap able of compliance with the regulation. **I am**  **also submitting**  **the following**  **contact information:**  **Alicia J**  **, 823**  **Ma ndarin**  **Drive, Hinesville,**  **GA ,**  **31313 and**  **beauty_li_li@yahoo.com** I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger by ensuring that they are securely restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cau se harm to other passengers on the airplane by being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions.

I propose that Miracle Rose Jenkins be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES,
ma nufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though she exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensures a high level of safety for Miracle and a high level of safety for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. In fact, in Miracle ’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire flight. Enhancing safety for Miracle is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by the fact that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System allo ws her to use commercial air transportation. W ithout the support and security of the FAA Approved Child Restraint System, she would be unable to fly commercially. I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES restraint are the same as t hose used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrity if used by someone who weighed several hundred pounds.I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the child

attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this mi ght cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would m ean that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restraint).

In order to achieve an equivalent level of safety as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose that the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Miracle only sits in a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist for a passenger seated behind Miracle while she is using the CARES restraint. I al so propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of Miracle’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him or her. In addition, I propose that Miracle’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption. I also request th at the processing of this petition not be delayed for publication and comment in the Federal Register. W e want to travel on December 10, 2015 . If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may not be able to tra vel in this timeframe. If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following:

This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System, this child would be unable to fly. W e request that this child be allowed to occupy a n FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though she exceeds the
ma nufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this child is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide for her during the flight. Thank you for your consideration of this request.