alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ewald’s Executor v. City of Louisville. Commonwealth v. Ewald’s Executor.

(Decided November 28, 1916.)

Appeals from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

GIBSON & CRAWFORD for appellant, Ewald’s Executor.

PENDLETON BECKLEY, GEORGE CARY TABB and STUART CHEVALIER for City of Louisville.

HODGES & JAMES, JOHN C. DUFFY, M. H. THATCHER and TRABUE, DOOLAN & COX for Commonwealth.

Response to the petition for modification and extension of the opinion rendered October 17,1916 — By

Judge Thomas.

The petition for modification and extension of the opinion rendered herein, which opinion is found in 171 *452Ky. 509, calls our attention to the fact that in that opinion we overlooked certain personal’ property belonging to the estate of L. P. Ewald which he had failed to list for taxation for the taxing years of 1904, 1905 and 1906; The opinion referred to seems to have only decided that the estate of Ewald was not liable for the personal property held in the name of Ewald Iron Company for those years. The record shows that at the assessing periods for those years Mr. Ewald was the owner of other personal property besides the money on deposit in the name of the Ewald Iron Company, and which had failed to be assessed for taxation for either of the years mentioned. This property consisted of 850 shares of the capital stock of Plelmbacher Forge and Rolling Mill Company, and 500 shares of the capital stock of Granby Mining and Smelting Company, and perhaps other personalty. The proceeding’s are broad enough to authorize the court to assess this property for taxation for the above named years, and, under the testimony, it clearly had a right to do so. The fact that the stock in these corporations was kept by the owner in some safety vault in the city of St. Louis, Missouri, does not deprive it from having’ a situs for taxation in the city of Louisville, Kentucky, the home of Ewald. It results, therefore, that the opinion, when it denied the city the right to any taxes for those years, went further than the facts justified, and the petition for modification is sustained to the extent that the judgment should tax all the personal property belonging to the decedent for the years mentioned, except the money on deposit in St. Louis banks in the name of the Ewald Iron Company. In other respects it is overruled, and the mandate should be corrected so as to conform herewith. Upon the return of the case, the value of the stocks mentioned, and other personal property, if any,. owned by Ewald in his individual name at the assessing periods for those years, should be fixed by the court and judgment rendered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Jeffrey A. Whitnell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Akorn, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/ JEFFREY A. WHITNELL     Jeffrey A. Whitnell  *Chief Financial Officer*Date:August 10, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Marvin Putnam, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having considered 

the Motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

The Motion is GRANTED. Marvin Putnam may appear and participate in this action on 

behalf of Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of 

all electronic filings to Marvin Putnam, at Marvin.Putnam@lw.com.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at , Florida, this 

day of .

 

 United States District Judge

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 37-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-37.250 What actions must a SASP take when it learns of damage to or loss of surplus property in its custody?

If you learn that surplus property in your custody has been damaged or lost, you must always notify GSA and notify the appropriate law enforcement officials if a crime has been committed.
Gambierdiscus toxicus 

Gambierdiscus toxicus is Florida’s second most problematic 

HAB species. It occurs worldwide in tropical and subtropical 

waters—including in and around coral reefs. In Florida,

G. toxicus is found from Palm Beach to the Dry Tortugas and 

Florida Bay. 

Gambierdiscus toxicus is suspected in fish kills and disease 

events and produces a toxin called ciguatoxin, which causes 

ciguatera fish poisoning (CFP). The symptoms of CFP appear 

within 3 to 24 hours and can last several days or recur for years. 

One telltale sign of CFP is temperature reversal—a piece of ice 

Gamb will feel hot to the touch, and a hot cup of coffee will feel cold. ierdiscus toxicus

More than 400 species of fish can cause CFP. Some of these 

are grouper, mahi mahi, snapper, and amberjack. 

Credit: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation 

Commission (FWC)
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
Amendment


to the Committed Revolving Credit Facility in the amount of USD 50.000.000,-, between Norðurál Grundartangi ehf., reg. no: 570297-2609, as the Borrower and Landsbankinn hf., reg. no. 471008-0280, as the Bank, dated November 27th 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”).


The Borrower and the Bank have agreed to make the following amendments to the Agreement:


1)  Termination date


Definition of “Termination Date” in Clause 1.1 of the Agreement shall hereafter be as follows:


“Termination Date


means November 27th, 2022”


2) Other Provisions


For new extended Termination Date according to clause 3 of this amendment and in accordance with clause 14.5 of the Agreement, the Borrower shall pay the Bank an extension fee amounting to 0,20% of the Facility Amount.


The Borrower accepts by signing this Amendment that the extension fee will be charged of the Borrower’s bank account no. 0186-38-100220.


Otherwise as not specifically stated in this Amendment, the Agreement shall be unaffected and shall be governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement.


The   parties   hereto   have   caused   this   Amendment   to   be   duly   executed       in
                                   , on    October 2,            2019.


This Amendment has been prepared and signed in two copies of equal legal force, one copy for the Bank, and one copy for the Borrower.






	
					
	On behalf of the Borrower
	 
	 
	On behalf of the Bank
	 

	 /s/Kristinn Bjarnason 
	 
	 
	/s/Árni Pór Porbjörnsson        
	 

	 
	 
	 
	/s/Davíđ Björnsson        
	 

	 
	 
	 
	s/Einar Kristján Jónsson
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Witnesses to the correct date and signature:
	 
	 
	 

	/s/Helga Jóna Hannesdóttir
	130171-5409
	 
	  /s/Guđmunda Ósk Kristjánsdóttir
	 020976-3149  

	Name
	  Id. No.
	 
	Name
	  Id. No.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of Allied.
 /s/ Deborah F. Ricci

Deborah F. Ricci
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
November 16, 2009
    
    /s/ John J. Marcello

John J. Marcello
Chief Executive Officer and President
November 16, 2009
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5297

To amend the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act to authorize

the Secretary of Agriculture to provide cost share assistance for the

construction of reservoir structures for the storage of water in rural

areas, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 2000

Mr. EVERETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention

Act to authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide

cost share assistance for the construction of reservoir

structures for the storage of water in rural areas, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COST SHARE ASSISTANCE FOR RURAL WATER

4 STORAGE AND SUPPLY.

5 (a) ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Watershed Pro6 tection and Flood Prevention Act is amended by inserting
2

•HR 5297 IH

1 after section 3A (16 U.S.C. 1003a) the following new sec2 tion:

3 ‘‘SEC. 3B. COST SHARE ASSISTANCE FOR RURAL WATER

4 STORAGE AND SUPPLY.

5 ‘‘(a) RESERVOIR STRUCTURES AND TRANSMISSION

6 LINES.—The Secretary may provide cost share assistance

7 to project sponsors to enable such sponsors to construct—

8 ‘‘(1) reservoir structures for the storage of

9 water; and

10 ‘‘(2) main water transmission lines to increase

11 the water supply in a rural area.

12 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBILITY.—In order to qualify for assistance

13 under this section, a project must be designed to increase

14 the supply of water in a rural area that is experiencing

15 a severe problem with the quality or quantity of water.

16 ‘‘(c) AMOUNT OF ASSISTANCE; LIMITATION.—The

17 amount of the assistance provided by the Secretary for

18 a project under this section shall cover at least 50 percent

19 of the project costs, except that rural water supply costs

20 under subsection (a)(2) may not exceed 50 percent of total

21 project costs.

22 ‘‘(d) RURAL AREA DEFINED.—In this section, the

23 term ‘rural area’ means any area that is not within the

24 outer boundary of any city having a population of 65,000
3

•HR 5297 IH

1 or more, according to the most recent decennial census

2 of the United States.’’.

3 (b) DEFINITION OF WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT.—Sec4 tion 2 of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention

5 Act (16 U.S.C. 1002) is amended by striking ‘‘Each

6 project must contain’’ and all that follows through ‘‘bene7 fits of the project.’’.

8 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3A of the

9 Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (16

10 U.S.C. 1003a) is amended by inserting ‘‘WETLAND OR

11 FLOODPLAIN CONSERVATION EASEMENTS’’ before

12 the period at the end of the section heading.

Æ
Document

Exhibit 10.2




SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT


This Seventeenth Amendment of the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement (the “Seventeenth Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 1st day of August, 2019, by and between and Union Bank and Trust Company, a Nebraska banking corporation and trust company, solely in its capacity as trustee of various grantor trusts known as Short Term Federal Investment Trusts or other grantor trusts (“Union Bank”) and National Education Loan Network, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Nelnet”). 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into that certain Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated as of June 1, 2001, as amended (the “Agreement”), and the parties hereto wish to amend the Agreement under the terms set forth herein. 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 


1. Definitions.  Unless otherwise expressly stated herein, capitalized terms in this Seventeenth Amendment shall have the same meanings given to them in the Agreement. 


2. Change in Volume of Participations.  For purposes of the Agreement and this Seventeenth Amendment, the maximum aggregate total of participation interests sold to Union Bank shall be up to $900 million, or such other amount as the parties may mutually agree to from time to time.  The parties acknowledge and agree that the existing aggregate volume of participation interests sold to Union Bank may be in approximately such stated amount prior to the date of this Seventeenth Amendment.


3. Effect of Seventeenth Amendment.  This Seventeenth Amendment shall be effective as of August 1, 2019. Unless expressly modified or amended by this Seventeenth Amendment, all terms and provision contained in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification. 


Union Bank and Trust Company    National Education Loan Network, Inc.




By:     /s/ Jon Gross                               By:    /s/ Dana Scott                                
Title:       SVP                                        Title:      AVP                                     P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,281
<SECURITIES>                                     7,874
<RECEIVABLES>                                  274,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,006)
<INVENTORY>                                    320,942
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               650,386
<PP&E>                                         617,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                (88,975)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,172,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          457,050
<BONDS>                                      1,290,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          134,193
<PREFERRED>                                        427
<COMMON>                                         2,170
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,172,526
<SALES>                                        495,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               495,892
<CGS>                                          410,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  410,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,173
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,558
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (130)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (130)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
§ 102-117.35 What are the advantages and disadvantages of using GSA's tender of service? ( a ) It is an advantage to use GSA's tender of service when you want to: ( 1 ) Use GSA's authority to negotiate on behalf of the Federal Government and take advantage of the lower rates and optimum service that result from a larger volume of business;
( 2 ) Use a uniform tender of service;
( 3 ) Obtain assistance with loss and damage claims; and
( 4 ) Use GSA's Transportation management and operations expertise.
( b ) It is a disadvantage to use GSA's tender of service when: ( 1 ) You want an agreement that is binding for a longer term than the GSA tender of service;
( 2 ) You have sufficient time to follow FAR contracting procedures and are in position to make volume or shipment commitments under a FAR contract; and
( 3 ) Rates are not cost effective, as determined by the agency.
[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 51393, Aug. 20, 2010; 87 FR 32322, May 31, 2022]
#### § 101-27.504 Notice to GSA.

When an activity elects to offer material to GSA for credit, the activity shall submit offers in accordance with chapter 4 of the FEDSTRIP Operating Guide or chapter 9 of MILSTRIP (DoD 4000.25-1-M).

[56 FR 11939, Mar. 21, 1991]
EXHIBIT 99.8



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:


                  SUNBEAM CORPORATION NAMES TWO NEW EXECUTIVES

         FORT LAUDERDALE, FL - September 16, 1996 - Sunbeam Corporation
(NYSE:SOC) announced today, in conjunction with its rapid assembly of a highly
focused management team, that it has named Lee Griffith to the position of Vice
President, Sales, and R. Dixon Thayer to the position of Vice President,
International. Both men will report to Newt White, Sunbeam's Executive Vice
President, Consumer Products Worldwide.
         Mr. Griffith, who will be responsible for Sunbeam's newly centralized
sales organization, joins the Company from Scott Paper Limited of Canada, where
he served as President and Chief Executive Officer since January, 1995. During
his tenure, he more than doubled shareholder value at that Company while
achieving record sales and earnings results. Lee had previously worked for Scott
Paper Company as Vice President, Consumer Sales for North America where he also
achieved record sales results. Prior to that position, he was responsible for
Scott Paper's Consumer Product Sales in the United States.
         Mr. Thayer will be responsible for all International operations and
will lead the new global expansion effort at Sunbeam. Prior to joining Sunbeam,
Dixon was Vice President, Global Research, Development Engineering and Global
Growth for Kimberly Clark (and Scott Paper Company pre-merger) for that
Company's multi-billion dollar worldwide commercial business. He was a leader in
geographic expansion initiatives into South America, Asia Pacific, South Africa
and Eastern Europe and has also lived in various cities in Europe and Mexico.
Dixon has previously held numerous executive positions at Scott Paper, including
Vice President responsible for that Company's European Commercial business and
Vice President, Worldwide Business Strategy and Integration.
         Albert J. Dunlap, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
stated, "Both Lee and Dixon have worked closely with me in the past and are
proven, highly successful leaders" Mr. Dunlap added, "With the additions of
these men, the assembly of Sunbeam's new, highly focused senior management team
is close to completion."

<PAGE>

         Sunbeam Corporation is a leading consumer products company that
designs, manufactures and markets, nationally and internationally, a diverse
portfolio of outdoor and household brand name products. The Company's Sunbeam(R)
and Oster(R) brands have been household names for generations, both domestically
and abroad, and the Company is a market leader in many of its product
categories.


                                ****************


Contact: Media:                           Investor Relations:
         Pete Judice                      John DeSimone
         (212) 614 - 4506                 Sunbeam Corporation
                                          (954)767-2100
#### § 3021.11 Submitting an appeal and other documents.

Petitions for Review, comments, motions, answers, and other documents may be submitted by persons other than the Postal Service by mail, electronically through the Commission's website, *http://www.prc.gov,* or by delivery to the Commission's offices at 901 New York Avenue NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.

[77 FR 6679, Feb. 9, 2012, as amended at 85 FR 9660, Feb. 19, 2020]
September 3, 2015 Docket No FAA-2015-2118 Addendum 1 Flying Media Craig Peck, Owner 837 Willow Rd. Lancaster, PA 17601 cpeck@flyingmedia.net 717.475.2482 Description of aircraft(s) for proposed UAS operation(s): 1. AeroNavics Sky Jib -Ti-QRX4XL, multi-rotor, max. weight (including payload) is 40 lbs.

2. DJI Flame Wheel F550, multi-rotor, max. weight (including payload) is 5.5 lbs.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG, Case No. 1:22-cv-22362-DPG

Plaintiff,

v.

HUBLOT OF AMERICA INC.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

Plaintiff RAYMOND T. MAHLBERG, hereby notifies the court that a provisional 

settlement has been reached in the above-captioned case. The parties would like to avoid any 

additional expense, and further the interests of judicial economy, while they focus efforts on 

finalizing the material terms of the settlement and reducing it to a writing. Plaintiff therefore 

requests this Court to vacate all currently set dates with the expectation that Notice for 

Dismissal with prejudice as to all claims will be filed within forty-five (45) days. 

Dated this 30th day of August 2022.

By: __/s/ Acacia Barros___

Acacia Barros, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 106277

ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

11120 N Kendall Dr., Suite 201

Miami, Florida 33176

Telephone: 305-639-8381

ab@barroswlawfirm.com

Counsel for Plaintiff 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 30th day of August 2022 that the foregoing document has 

been filed using CM/ECF system and will be served on Defendant.

 

s/Acacia Barros

Attorney for Plaintiff

ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

Case 1:22-cv-22362-DPG Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 1