alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS



### UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 40107

Appellee ) )

v. ) ) ORDER
Jaden C. ROSS )
Airman First Class (E

- 3 ) )
U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Panel 1

On 18 January 2022 , Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach . Specifically, Appellant moved to attach DD Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and Special
Courts

- Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals , signed by
both Appellant and Appellant’s counsel on 18 January 2022

. On 19 January 2022, Appellant’s counsel submitted a Motion to Amend. In this motion, Appellant’s counsel states that t he DD Form 2330 “was intendedto be filed with Appellant having circled ‘withdraw my case from appellate review’ and lined through ‘waive my rights to appellate review,’ just above his signature.” Attached to this motion wa s the first page of the DD Form 2330 reflecting the described modifications. The second page to the DD Form 2330
was not included with this motion and remains with the 18 January 2022 motion.

The Government did not submit any opposition.

The court considers the amended fir st page of the DD Form 2330 as attached to the second page of the DD Form 2330 from the 18 January 2022 motion , and therefore find s the withdrawal substantially compliant with Rule for
Courts

- Martial (R.C.M .) 1115 ( Manual for Courts

- Martial

, United States (2019
ed. ) ( 2019 MCM

) )

. According ly

, it is by the court on this 25 th day of January

, 202 2

,
ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Amend and Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach are GRANTED

. Appellant’s case is forwarded toU nited S tates v. R oss , N o. ACM 40107

2 the Appellate Records Branch, AFLOA/JAJM, for further processing in accordance with R .C.M. 111 5 ( f )(3) and 1201 ( 2019 MCM )

.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court
**SO2 Changes:** As a result of this final action, the agency is planning to increase the Texas

state emissions budget for sulfur dioxide (SO2) by 50,517 tons, representing a 21% increase over the SO2 emissions budget originally set for Texas. In last summer's final CSAPR rule, Texas' SO2 budget was 243,954 tons. The revisions proposal increased that budget by 29%, and , again, as a result of this final revisions notice, the budget has increased by 21% relative to the previous final budget. If the Agen cy were to finalize the approach used in the revisions proposal, we would be inviting requests from additional sources

-- who would notice that we were finalizing for a couple of facilities in Texas a change from the approach used for everyone in the fina l CSAPR notice

-- to use performance data based on their worst performing year. Similarly, we would be inviting litigation from environmental advocates who would be opposed to increasing the budgets at all. Instead, we acknowledge the mistake in using the performance data from one year for Texas in the revisions proposal, and the correct ion of that mistake in this final notice.
Wh ile the proposed revisions rule would have provided Luminant, the biggest allowance

recipient in TX, with an additional 28K SO2 allowances, the final revisions rule still provides Luminant with an additional 21K SO2 allowances. The value of these additional allowances for 2012 is estimated to be $12.6 million. As a result, the SO2 allowance allocation for Luminant would incre ase to approximately 100,000 tons, representing a 27% increase over the company’s allocation in the final CSAPR. **NOx Changes:** In last summer's final CSAPR rule, Texas' annual NOx budget was 133,595 tons. The revisions proposal increased that budget by 1% and as a result of this final and direct final revisions notice, the budget has increased by 3% relative to the previous final budget. In last summer's final CSAPR rule, Texas' ozone season NOx budget was 63,043 tons. The revisions proposal increased tha t budget by 2%, and as a result of this final and direct final revisions notice, the budget has increased by 4% relative to the previous final budget. In addition, the allocation of annual NOX allowances for Luminant under the final and direct final revisi ons rule would increase by 2,654, representing an 8% increase over the company’s allocation in the final CSAPR. The value of these additional allowances for 2012 is estimated to be $1.3 million. The allocation of ozone season NOX allowances for Luminant u nder the final and direct final revisions rule would increase by 1,218 tons , representing an 8% increase over the company’s allocation in the final CSAPR. The value of these additional allowances for 2012 is estimated to be $1.6 million. **For the entire S tate of Texas, relative to the original final budgets, the value of the**  **increase in the budgets for 2012 is estimated to be $30.3 million for the SO2 budget increase, $2.1 million for the annual NOx budget increase, and $3.3 million for the ozone**  **season NO x budget increase, adding up to a total value of the increase for 2012 of $35.6**  **million.**
#### § 102-33.450 How must we report accident and incident data?

You must report accident and incident data to GSA at *http://www.gsa.gov/aviationpolicy* or call GSA's Aviation Policy Division and report the accident or incident telephonically.
apvo-ex102_63.htm



 

Exhibit 10.2

November 6, 2019

Mr. Marvin White

APTEVO RESEARCH AND 

DEVELOPMENT LLC

2401 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1200

Seattle, Washington 98121

RE:Lease Dated April 28, 2003 by and between Selig Real Estate Holdings Eight, LLC and later assigned to SREH 2018 Holdings LLC and Aptevo Research and Development LLC. 

Dear Daphne:

Please let this letter serve as our agreement, subject to the provisions described herein, to cancel and terminate the above referenced Lease of 3,067 rentable square feet located on the first floor of our 2401 Fourth Avenue Building.

Provided that if Lessee is not in breach of any of the terms and conditions set forth in the Lease, the effective date of this lease cancellation shall be August 31, 2019, and thereafter all rights and obligations pertaining to this Lease will terminate.

Unless modified herein, all other Lease terms and conditions shall remain in full force and effect.

If you are in agreement with the above, please sign and notarize three (3) original copies and return all three (3) to my attention for Martin Selig’s signature. Upon full execution I shall return one (1) original for your records.

Sincerely,

/s/ Michael Brixner

Michael Brixner

SIGNATURE BLOCK ONLY ON LAST PAGE

 



 

 

Mr. Marvin White

APTEVO RESEARCH AND 

DEVELOPMENT LLC.

August 9, 2019

Page 2

 

 

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

 


	
SREH 2018 HOLDINGS LLC
	
 
	
APTEVO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
/s/ Martin Selig
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
/s/ Marvin White

	
By:
	
 
	
Martin Selig
	
 
	
By:
	
 
	
Marvin White

	
Its:
	
 
	
Manager
	
 
	
Its:
	
 
	
President & CEO

	
Dated:
	
 
	
August 22, 2019
	
 
	
Dated:
	
 
	
8/16/19
ECN_2012_US_21I3.txt[8/2/2015 12:22:06 PM]

EC1221I3

Mining: Industry Series: Selected Supplies, Minerals Received for Preparation, Purchased Machinery, and Fuels

Consumed by Type for the U.S.: 2012

Release Date : 02/27/2015

Data based on the 2012 Economic Census. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling

error, and definitions, see Methodology. Data in this table represent those available when this file was created; data

may not be available for all NAICS industries or geographies. Data in this table may be subject to employment- and/or

sales-size minimums that vary by industry.

For information on economic census geographies, including changes for 2012, see the economic census Help Center.

 

 Table Name 

 Mining: Industry Series: Selected Supplies, Minerals Received for Preparation, Purchased Machinery, and Fuels

Consumed by Type for the United States: 2012 

 

 

 ReleaseSchedule 

 Data are scheduled for release on a flow basis beginning in July 2014 and ending in December 2014. 

 

 

 Universe 

 The universe includes all establishments classified in mining sector 21 with one or more paid employee at any time

during the year. 

 

 

 GeographyCoverage 

 Data are shown at the U.S. level. 

 

 

 IndustryCoverage 

 Data are shown at the six-digit North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) level. 

 

 

 Data ItemsandOtherIdentifyingRecords 

 This file contains data on: 

 

 Consumption quantity 

 Delivered cost ($1,000) 

 Data are also identified by supplies and fuels consumed by type. 

 

 

 Sort Order 

 Data are presented in ascending NAICS code by material code sequence. 

 

 

 FTP Download 

 Download the entire table at http://www2.census.gov/econ2012/EC/sector21/EC1221I3.zip 

 

 
ECN_2012_US_21I3.txt[8/2/2015 12:22:06 PM]

 ContactInformation 

 U.S. Census Bureau, Economy Wide Statistics Division Data User Outreach and Education Staff Washington, DC

20233-6900 Tel: (800) 242-2184 Tel: (301) 763-5154 ewd.outreach@census.gov 

 

X Not applicable

D Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies; data are included in higher level totals

S Withheld because estimate did not meet publication standards.

(q) 20 to 29 percent estimated

(p) 10 to 19 percent estimated

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Economic Census

Note: The data in this file are based on the 2012 Economic Census. To maintain confidentiality, the U.S. Census Bureau

 suppresses data to protect the identity of any business or individual. The census results in this file contain nonsampling

error. Data users who create their own estimates using data from this file should cite the U.S. Census Bureau as the

source of the original data only. For the full technical documentation, see Methodology link in above headnote.

Symbols:D - Withheld to avoid disclosing data for individual companies; data are included in higher level totalsN - Not

available or not comparableFor a complete list of all economic programs symbols, see the Symbols Glossary
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3070724-FEB-201207:52 AM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on November 12, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                    (“the Act”), Test & Diagnostics Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are Advanced Testing Technologies, Inc., Hauppauge, NY; Aeroflex Incorporated, Plainview, NY; Allied Signal Aerospace Canada, Ontario, Canada; DME Corporation, Fort Lauderdale, FL; Freightliner Corporation, Portland, OR; ManTech Test Systems, Incorporated, Fairfax, VA; PEI Electronics Inc., Huntsville, AL; Racal Instruments, Inc., Irvine, CA; Systems & Electronics Inc. (Subsidiary of ESCO), St. Louis, MO; Teradyne, Inc., Boston, MA; and Virginia Panel Corporation, Waynesboro, VA. The nature and objectives of the venture are to conduct joint research activities intended to standardize and improve test and diagnostics systems and                           ( print page 38598)                        equipment used by the Defense, Commercial Airline, Automobile, Trucking, Railroad, Satellite, Maritime Shipping, Medical Device, Telecommunications and Computer industries.                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-15600  Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Text of Final Regulation 

Strikeout Version and Clean Copy

Revisions to the South Carolina Air Quality Implementation Plan – 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review 

March 14, 2011

Text of Final Regulation - Page 1
Strikeout/Highlight Version, R. 61-62.5, Standard No. 7 ................................................................3 

Strikeout/Highlight Version, R. 61-62.5, Standard No. 7.1 ...........................................................48 

Clean Copy, R. 61-62.5, Standard No. 7 ........................................................................................78 

Clean Copy, R. 61-62.5, Standard No. 7.1 ...................................................................................123 

Revisions to the South Carolina Air Quality Implementation Plan – 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source Review 

March 14, 2011

Text of Final Regulation - Page 2
§ 83.33 Equipment for sound signals (Rule 33). ( a ) A vessel of 12 meters or more in length shall be provided with a whistle, a vessel of 20 meters or more in length shall be provided with a bell in addition to a whistle, and a vessel of 100 meters or more in length shall, in addition, be provided with a gong, the tone and sound of which cannot be confused with that of the bell. The whistle, bell and gong shall comply with the specifications in Annex III to these Rules (33 CFR part 86). The bell or gong or both may be replaced by other equipment having the same respective sound characteristics, provided that manual sounding of the prescribed signals shall always be possible.
( b ) A vessel of less than 12 meters in length shall not be obliged to carry the sound signaling appliances prescribed in paragraph (a) of this Rule but if she does not, she shall be provided with some other means of making an efficient sound signal.
#### § 101-11.0 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR chapter 102, parts 1 through 220).

For information on records and standard and optional forms, see FMR parts 102-193 and 102-194 (41 CFR parts 102-193 and 102-194).

[70 FR 3132, Jan. 19, 2005]
#### § 102-33.245 May we report as excess, or replace (i.e., by exchange/sale), both operational and non-operational aircraft?

Yes, you may report as excess, or replace both operational and non-operational aircraft by following the rules governing excess personal property and exchange/sale (see 41 CFR parts 102-36 and 102-39, respectively).
Case 0:22-cv-62024-JEM   Document 6   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023   Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,896,316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  568,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                   192,000
<INVENTORY>                                    925,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,262,286
<PP&E>                                         615,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                 377,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,543,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,526,778
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,378
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,355,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,543,044
<SALES>                                      1,917,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,001,035
<CGS>                                        1,270,838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,270,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,625,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               249,983
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,894,860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,899,860)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,899,860)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.48)


</TABLE>
§ 102-37.90 What are GSA's responsibilities in the donation of surplus property? The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for supervising and directing the disposal of surplus personal property. In addition to issuing regulatory guidance for the donation of such property, GSA: ( a ) Determines when property is surplus to the needs of the Government;
( b ) Allocates and transfers surplus property on a fair and equitable basis to State agencies for surplus property (SASPs) for further distribution to eligible donees;
( c ) Oversees the care and handling of surplus property while it is in the custody of a SASP;
( d ) Approves all transfers of surplus property to public airports, pursuant to the appropriate determinations made by the Federal Aviation Administration (see subpart F of this part);
( e ) Donates to the American National Red Cross property (generally blood plasma and related medical materials) originally provided by the Red Cross to a Federal agency, but that has subsequently been determined surplus to Federal needs (see subpart G of this part);
( f ) Approves, after consultation with the holding agency, foreign excess personal property to be returned to the United States for donation purposes;
( g ) Coordinates and controls the level of SASP and donee screening at Federal installations;
( h ) Imposes appropriate conditions on the donation of surplus property having characteristics that require special handling or use limitations (see § 102-37.455); and
( i ) Keeps track of and reports on Federal donation programs (see § 102-37.105).
§ 102-118.470 Are there statutory time limits for a TSP on filing an administrative claim with the GSA Transportation Audits Division? Yes, an administrative claim must be received by the GSA Transportation Audits Division or its designee (the agency where the claim arose) within 3 years beginning the day after the latest of the following dates (except in time of war): ( a ) Accrual of the cause of action;
( b ) Payment of charges for the transportation involved;
( c ) Subsequent refund for overpayment of those charges; or
( d ) Deductions made to a TSP claim by the Government under 31 U.S.C. 3726.
[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32325, May 31, 2022]
#### § 101-29.203 Federal specification.

A *Federal specification* is a specification, issued in the Federal series, that is mandatory for use by all Federal agencies. These documents are issued or controlled by the General Services Administration and are listed in the GSA “Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions.”
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5638

To amend section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to provide

that States have the final authority to establish guidelines to determine

which animal feeding operations are classified as concentrated animal

feeding operations for purposes of the national pollutant discharge elimination system.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 4, 2000

Mr. SMITH of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to provide that States have the final authority

to establish guidelines to determine which animal feeding

operations are classified as concentrated animal feeding

operations for purposes of the national pollutant discharge elimination system.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control

4 Act (33 U.S.C. 1342) is amended by adding at the end

5 the following:
2

•HR 5638 IH

1 ‘‘(q) CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPER2 ATIONS.—A State has the final authority to establish

3 guidelines for determining which animal feeding oper4 ations in the State are classified as concentrated animal

5 feeding operations for purposes of this section. The State’s

6 guidelines shall provide the factors to be considered in

7 making such a determination, including number and con8 centration of animal units, the properties of the discharge

9 (including the volume and frequency of the discharge and

10 the type of pollutant), and other site-specific factors.’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT24.6****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A.Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full powerof substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical PartnersInternational, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesas he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of saidattorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.                                                            /s/ James Ken Newman   James Ken Newman
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 212-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2023 Page 1 of 1