alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.


Date: March 23, 2005                     By:  /S/ ROBERT A. FERGUSON
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name: Robert A. Ferguson
                                              Title: President, Chief Executive
                                              Officer and Director
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 80.1114 San Pedro Bay—Anaheim Bay, CA. ( a ) A line drawn across the seaward extremities of the Anaheim Bay Entrance Jetties; thence to Long Beach Breakwater East End Light 1.
( b ) A line drawn from Long Beach Channel Entrance Light 2 to Long Beach Light.
( c ) A line drawn from Los Angeles Main Entrance Channel Light 2 to Los Angeles Light.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, as amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7787, Mar. 6, 1986. Further redesignated by CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
From:

To:

Subject:

Date:

Attachments:

HODD Joan

EAS (OST)

Document DOT-OST-1997-2706

Friday, August 23, 2013 6:14:47 PM

image001.pno

,~: i ;

,"_;,';l ..!-.

I would like to voice my opinion in regard to bringing back SkyWest and changing the

Vernal to Denver flight to Salt Lake. Most business in Vernal is oil field related, therefore

our regional offices are located in Denver. The direct flight ensures my ability to attend

meetings that are located in Denver. If I were to have to drive, the time away would not

permit my attendance.

Joan Hopp

NALCO Champion !An Ecolab Company ''':GcC' f,. ~sC'n:::.. !p;r··a· .. .!.- '}<.J',-

T 435 78; 4?J7 F Lt~;3 789 4:$: 6 E Joan Hopp@CHAMP-TECH.COM

T~!e '~'--or;·j1r..t!cn:;~'~n'8 S;-'-:oji .rav bt:.,:::~r-:7;'--;?:!~ia!c;r~(/');- ':.;·IV;:'2c;e~ '--;"':':::"fI"'"di r -n'0'r;Je-:i <' :'~ .-~ -'(,"11\1(:-·0 jy -)("+, ~;l-:':·'~i\.",d'_~.'':-:~i'~

)rCC!::iZ<?"L,"X,n3r;~e,~' :::liX':"iL, ':'- -~0;~,';::,9 nr:t ~~,e !j";':;:"--1O?Q :F ~';: '~;·Jt:'L..:-;::r)d '-E)rC-~{-:':'t~:~;d'/e~T -:)":0 :~.er,OS0 ;2cj~,',:",\,,~'../0t) 8~'::

:",:;)LfisO that SF:.;' '""e";!?',.' .:jI::-';:::~;fT": ••~t!Ci-' :,;' C-(},:.y'r;~l +,:; -,' ? 3-t, tc 2·•~:' . .t \;;...~.(:f .tj~ _ ,: l \:'-'~k',i(!.j G.:-:r:~<:i;::~:'"":8"'~:':

pIClh:b:'c:,:' '.'jOLth::pe ~e~:e',jE-:j ::11:: ,;:,~rral;-~ 2f"O:- pie-:·'s~ !r"'k;":~rl;a!~l\;~;f.;rifjhE' ~~,-:.'·~er OJ [".;f;.·;·' 8""'::;'" oJ>':'. Ji.·:03t:; ~:'-Jj~ '?-'~'!;::d f;Y~~':
Argued and submitted February 24,

reversed and remanded September 6,

Willamette Industries’ petition for review and DEQ’s petition for review allowed December 19, 1995 (322 Or 420)

#### In the Matter of the Air Contaminant Discharge Permit Application of Willamette Industries, Inc. LOCAL NO. 290, PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS, and on behalf of certain individual members residing in Albany, Oregon, and Royce Clouse, *Appellants, v.*OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and Environmental Quality Commission of Oregon, *Respondents, and*WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES, INC., *Intervenor-Respondent.*

(9302-00754; CA A81725)

901 P2d 919

Linda K. Williams argued the cause and filed the brief for appellants.

John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

William H. Walters argued the cause for intervenor-respondent. With him on the brief were John F. Neupert and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

*545PER CURIAM
#### § 102-5.40 May the agency head delegate the authority to make home-to-work determinations?

No, the agency head may not delegate the authority to make home-to-work determinations.
Exhibit



Exhibit 4.03



 AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT
This Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrant (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of July 10, 2019, by and between Amyris, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Foris Ventures, LLC (the “Holder”).


RECITALS


WHEREAS, on August 17, 2018, the Company issued to the Holder a Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the “Warrant”), which Warrant is currently exercisable for 4,877,386 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (without regard to any limitations on exercise thereof), at an exercise price of $7.52 per share.


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to amend the Warrant as set forth herein.


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5(l) of the Warrant, the Warrant may be amended with the written consent of the Company and the Holder.


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Amendment of Section 2(b) of the Warrant. Section 2(b) of the Warrant is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


    
b)    Exercise Price. The exercise price per share of the Common Stock under this Warrant shall be $2.87, subject to adjustment hereunder (the “Exercise Price”).


		
	2.
	Full Force and Effect. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms of the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect.




		
	3.
	Integration. This Amendment and the Warrant constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersede all prior understandings and agreements, whether oral or written, between or among the parties hereto with respect to the specific subject matter hereof.




		
	4.
	Counterparts; Facsimile. This Amendment may be executed in one (1) or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment may be executed and delivered by facsimile, by email in portable document format (.pdf), or by other electronic transmission, and delivery of any signature page by any such method will be deemed to have the same effect as if the original signature had been delivered to the other party.




[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


1








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


AMYRIS, INC.
By: _/s/ Kathleen Valiasek 
Name: _Kathleen Valiasek_______
Title: __Chief Business Officer___


[Signature Page to Foris Warrant Amendment]









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


FORIS VENTURES, LLC
By: _/s/ Barbara Hager
Name: _Barbara Hager__________
Title: ________________________


[Signature Page to Foris Warrant Amendment]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38597-38598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15600]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Test & Diagnostics Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 12, 1999, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Test & Diagnostics 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the identities of the parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act, the identities of the parties are Advanced Testing 
Technologies, Inc., Hauppauge, NY; Aeroflex Incorporated, Plainview, 
NY; Allied Signal Aerospace Canada, Ontario, Canada; DME Corporation, 
Fort Lauderdale, FL; Freightliner Corporation, Portland, OR; ManTech 
Test Systems, Incorporated, Fairfax, VA; PEI Electronics Inc., 
Huntsville, AL; Racal Instruments, Inc., Irvine, CA; Systems & 
Electronics Inc. (Subsidiary of ESCO), St. Louis, MO; Teradyne, Inc., 
Boston, MA; and Virginia Panel Corporation, Waynesboro, VA. The nature 
and objectives of the venture are to conduct joint research activities 
intended to standardize and improve test and diagnostics systems and

[[Page 38598]]

equipment used by the Defense, Commercial Airline, Automobile, 
Trucking, Railroad, Satellite, Maritime Shipping, Medical Device, 
Telecommunications and Computer industries.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-15600 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### JOHN GREEN, Appellant, *v.*ELISHA KING, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.

The only question presented by this appeal was, whether or not the evidence in the case was sufficient to sustain the findings of the referee. The General Term *held*that it was, and affirmed the judgment.

*James C.*Anderson, for the appellant.

*E. A.*Carpenter, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Tappen, J.

Present—Barnard, P. J., Tappen and Gilbert, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
/**
 * @file
 * JavaScript behaviors for webform wizard pages.
 */

(function ($, Drupal, once) {

  'use strict';

  /**
   * Link the wizard's previous pages.
   *
   * @type {Drupal~behavior}
   *
   * @prop {Drupal~behaviorAttach} attach
   *   Links the wizard's previous pages.
   */
  Drupal.behaviors.webformWizardPagesLink = {
    attach: function (context) {
      $(once('webform-wizard-pages-links', '.js-webform-wizard-pages-links', context)).each(function () {
        var $pages = $(this);
        var $form = $pages.closest('form');

        var hasProgressLink = $pages.data('wizard-progress-link');
        var hasPreviewLink = $pages.data('wizard-preview-link');

        $pages.find('.js-webform-wizard-pages-link').each(function () {
          var $button = $(this);
          var title = $button.attr('title');
          var page = $button.data('webform-page');

          // Link progress marker and title.
          if (hasProgressLink) {
            var $progress = $form.find('.webform-progress [data-webform-page="' + page + '"]');
            $progress.find('.progress-marker, .progress-title, .webform-progress-bar__page-title')
              .attr({
                'role': 'link',
                'title': title,
                'aria-label': title,
                'tabindex': '0'
              })
              .on('click', function () {
                $button.trigger('click');
              })
              .on('keydown', function (event) {
                if (event.which === 13) {
                  $button.trigger('click');
                }
              });
            // Only allow the marker to be tabbable.
            $progress.find('.progress-marker, .webform-progress-bar__page-title').attr('tabindex', 0);
          }

          // Move button to preview page div container with [data-webform-page].
          // @see \Drupal\webform\Plugin\WebformElement\WebformWizardPage::formatHtmlItem
          if (hasPreviewLink) {
            $form
              .find('.webform-preview [data-webform-page="' + page + '"]')
              .append($button)
              .show();
          }
        });
      });
    }
  };

})(jQuery, Drupal, once);
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0517

DCN:_____10038___________________________ 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 90-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/28/2023   Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-37.155 When does a plan take effect?

The plan takes effect on the date GSA notifies the chief executive officer of the State that the plan is approved.
250 E Street SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 / 800-942-2677

202-606-5000 / 800-942-2677

Subject: Updates for MLK Day of Service grantees 

Date: June 14, 2023 

Dear MLK Day of Service grantees, 

As we approach the end of your project periods, we would like to share updated guidance 

for completing required Project Progress Reports (PPRs). As a reminder, PPRs for the 2022-

2023 grant year are due October 12, 2023 for grantees with project periods ending in July, 

and December 29, 2023 for grantees with project periods ending in September. If you are 

unsure which due date applies to your grant, the correct deadline and reporting period are 

viewable in the eGrants Progress Reports screen. Please read the attached guidance 

carefully before completing your report even if you have submitted progress reports for this 

grant in the past, as some definitions have changed since last year. Please note in 

particular the changes to Performance Data Elements outlined on page 3. Progress reports 

that do not follow the new guidance will be returned for rework by your Portfolio Manager. 

While the PPRs are a formal way for us to learn about your projects’ progress and successes, 

we also encourage you to share some of the success stories that came out of your MLK Day 

events this year more informally by emailing us at DaysofService@cns.gov. Stories can include 

short narratives, photographs, news articles, or anything you would like to share about your 

Day of Service events. We’re eager to hear about how your events went and what you learned 

from them! 

In other news, a new and improved Grantees & Sponsors page for Days of Service grantees is 

coming soon to the AmeriCorps website, which will make it easy for you to find resources 

specific to your MLK Day grant in a centralized place. The new page will be a combined hub 

for resources for Volunteer Initiatives grantees, which include Days of Service and the 

Volunteer Generation Fund. We’re excited to make these resources available and will notify 

you once the page is up and running. 

Thank you all for your continued commitment to this impactful Day of Service, and we look 

forward to learning more about your projects from your emails and progress reports. 

 

In service, 

 

Emily Stock, Project Manager for Volunteer Initiatives 

Zoe Goldenberg-Hart, Volunteer Initiatives Grant Specialist
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

AUTOLOGIC INFORMATION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 21.1--SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following is a list of the subsidiaries of the Company as of January 14,
2000 (exclusive of certain subsidiaries which, if considered in the aggregate,
would not, as of October 29, 1999, constitute a significant subsidiary within
the meaning of Rule 1-02(v) of Regulation S-X). All of such subsidiaries, to the
extent they were active during fiscal 1999, are included as consolidated
subsidiaries in the Registrant's consolidated financial statements as of October
29, 1999.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Jurisdiction
                                                                                   of
Name (1)                                                                    Incorporation
--------                                                                    -------------
<S>                                                                         <C>
Xitron, Incorporated                                                        Michigan
Xitron Pty Limited                                                          Australia
Autologic Triple-I, Inc.                                                    Canada
Autologic Information International, Limited                                United Kingdom
Autologic Information International, A.B.                                   Sweden
Autologic Information International, Ltd.                                   Israel
Autologic Information International, Pty Limited                            Australia
Information International Overseas Corporation                              California
Information International Foreign Sales Corporation                         Guam
Autologic Information International Ltd.                                    Nevada
</TABLE>
----------
(1)  Each named subsidiary is wholly owned directly by the Company, except that
     in the case of certain foreign subsidiaries, qualifying shares may be
     registered in the name of directors and/or other subsidiaries of the
     Company.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38842-38843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 18, 2000, 1 p.m. to June 
18, 2000, 4 p.m., Georgetown Holiday Inn, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, 
Washington,

[[Page 38843]]

DC 20007 which was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 2000, 
65 FR 36154-36156.
    The meeting times have been changed to 5 p.m.-7 p.m. The meeting 
date and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: June 14, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-15747 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 102-83.100 What flexibility do Federal agencies have to implement part 102-83 in high cost areas?

Agencies have flexibility in considering the differing costs among principal cities within a single CBSA and in setting delineated areas to incorporate lower-cost markets.

There may be some instances where the head of the responsible acquiring agency or the head of the agency's designee determines that cost and security issues take precedence over the hierarchy of consideration in this part. Federal agencies may deviate from the hierarchy only where doing so would represent significant cost savings or security advantages to the Government. In such cases, agencies must consult and engage with and consider the recommendations of local officials, review and affirm this determination, and document the file accordingly.

In every instance, agencies must seek to meet the intent of the governing authorities described in § 102-83.10, and they must incorporate their applicable process into their internal policies and procedures.
Martin, Michael (OST) OT; ;rr, :T r\r 

From: Benson, Erin V [erin.benson@umpi.edu] '•> f r"^'^!^*-^^ -

Sent: Tliursday, January26, 2012 6:50 AM --^ '• cH,H!iUriS 

To: EAS (OST) 

Cc: Rice, Rachel M /I;!? ?£[] - 2 A jO: c;c 

Subject: air service for Presque Isle ME "' '^ "' ""' 

To Whom It May Concern: 

I feel it is critical to maintain reasonable airline service to Presque Isle, Maine. My father was a pilot for a major airline and 

I grew up on planes. Coming from Miami, Florida, I always had the pick of planes, destinations, times, and price. I realize 

those choices must be limited in a small market, but links to modern transportation is what keeps small communities 

viable places to live and work. 

As a professional at the University of Maine at Presque Isle, airline service is important to our many employees who take 

advantage of professional development, our goal of increasing out-of-state students, and in hosting guest speakers, 

consultants and potential employees who come from great distances. Timing is critical-daily flights with a modicum of 

choices in flight times. 

As a mother of two boys, I love to travel-to return to Florida to visit family and go forth to adventure in places unknown to 

us. Price point becomes critical to us as budgets are often smaller than our desires. 

Please know that advocating for reasonable air service is very important. We are counting on your work to help our 

community stay strong. 

Erin Benson 

Director of Admissions 

University of Maine at Presque Isle
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-41]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation  Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of P.L. 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-41 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: June 13, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 38252)          ( print page 38253)          ( print page 38254)    

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[FR Doc. 00-15437 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
#### § 952.20 Witness fees.

The Postal Service does not pay fees and expenses for Respondent's witnesses or for depositions requested by Respondent, unless otherwise ordered by the presiding officer.