alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Allied Defense Group, Inc (Allied) on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned, John G. Meyer, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer
and Charles A. Hasper as Chief Financial Officer of Allied, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Allied. /s/ Charles A. Hasper
    
    
    
    /s/ John G. Meyer, Jr.Charles A. Hasper
    
    
    
    John G. Meyer, Jr.Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    
    
    
    Chief Executive Officer and PresidentApril 25, 2005
    
    
    
    April 25, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Allied
Defense Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Allied Defense Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AMMENDMENT TO 333 EXEMPTION PETITION MIDWEST UAV IMAGING JASE W. ROBAK REGULATIONS.GOV ID - FAA- 2015 - 0746 - 0001

I AM ATTACHING SPEC SHEETS FOR AN ALMOST IDENTICAL QUADCOPTER THAT NEEDS TO BE AMMENDED INTO MY EXEMPTION PLEASE. I WOULD SIMPLY LIKE TO ADD 2 QUAD COPTERS TO MY PROPOSAL SECTION 333 EXEMPTION PETITION . AS NOTED ON THE ATTACHED SPEC SHEETS, THE DJI PHANTOM 3 QUADCOPTER VTOL AND THE YUNEEC Q500 TYPHOON QUADCOPTER VTOL, BOTH FALL WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF EXEMTIONS NOTED ON MY PETITION. BOTH, P HANTOM 3 AND Q500 SHOULD BE AMMENDED INTO MY ORIGIONAL EXEMPTION PETITION AT EVERY POINT FROM START TO FINISH THAT I HAVE LISTED THE PHANTOM 2 VISION +. MY GOAL IS TO INTERCHANGIBLY USE EACH DEVICE SO TO NOT STRESS ONE UNIT OUT WITH OVERFLYING IT TOO MUCH . THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL THREAT TO SOCIETY OR THE NAS AND MIDWEST UAV IMAGING (JASE W. ROBAK) WILL OPERATE IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER AS SET BY THE GUIDELINES IN THE EXEMPTION PETITION I HAVE PREVIOUSLY FILED. WITH REGARDS TO SIZE, WEIGHT, SPEED, AND PAYLOAD, NEITHER ADDED QUAD COPTER WILL EXCEED ANYTHING PERSCRIBED IN THE PETITION BY THE FAA NOR WILL MIDWEST UAV IMAGING COMPROMISE THEIR INTEGRITY WITH THE PUBLIC OR FAA AND OPERATE IN ANY MANNER THAT IS UNFAVORIBLE TO THE FAA OR SOCIETY. AS THE MIDWEST CONT INUES TO GET HEAVY RAINFALL, EVERY RIVER AND STREAM CONTINUES TO RISE AND FLOOD. I ASK TO GET MY PETITION PUSHED THROUGH AS THE PUBLIC WOULD GREATLY BENEFIT FROM SERVICES IN TERMS OF FLOOD MONITORING AND ASSESSING DAMAGED WATERWAYS, LOTS AND LAND. THERE HAS BEEN ONE CASUALTY DUE TO THE FLOODING IN OUR REGION AND I FEEL I COULD AID THE COMMUNITY UPON THE EXPEDITED APPROVAL OF MY PETITION. THANKS FOR YOU PROMPT ATTENTION REGARDS, JASE

JASE ROBAK MIDWEST UAV IMAGING C| 402 - 802 - 5804
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of North Shore
Capital IV, Inc., (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gerard Werner,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: October 11, 2005


/s/ Gerard Werner
Chief Executive Officer
October 11, 2005



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### § 101-29.302 Other Federal agencies.

Heads of other Federal agencies are responsible for adhering to the policies and procedures established by GSA for management and control of Federal product descriptions and for the use of these documents in acquisition as applicable.
Appendix 13 

RS-50 (R442A) PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 

PROPERTY RS-50 R404A R22 

 

Molecular Weight 81.8 97.6 86.5 

0

C -46.5(1) -46.2(1) -40.8 Boiling point (1 atm) 0

F -51.61) -51.21) -41.5 

Temperature Glide K 4.6 0.5 0 

0

C 82.4 72.1 96.1 Critical Temperature 0

F 180.3 161.7 205.1 

bara 47.6 37.3 49.9 Critical Pressure psia 690 541 724 

Liquid Density (25 0C) kg/m3 1108 1044 1191 

Density of saturated vapour (25 0C) kg/m3 47.7 65.3 44.2 

Latent Heat of Vaporisation at boiling 

point kJ/kg 266(1) 200(1) 234 

Cv (25 0C & 1bara) kJ/kg.K 0.727 0.784 0.559 

Cp (25 0C & 1bara) kJ/kg.K 0.838 0.877 0.662 

Cp/Cv (25 0C & 1 bara) 1.152 1.118 1.185 

bara 13.3(1) 12.6(1) 10.4 Vapour Pressure (25 0

C) psia 192(1) 182(1) 151 

Vapour Viscosity (25 0C & 1 bara) cP 0.0126 0.0120 0.0126 

Liquid Viscosity (25 0C) cP 0.141 0.128 0.164 

Liquid Thermal Conductivity (25 0C) W/m.K 0.0857 0.0636 0.0835 

Surface Tension (25 0C) N/m 0.00661 0.00455 0.00808 

Specific heat of liquid (25 0C) kJ/kg.K 1.58 1.54 1.26 

Ozone Depletion Potential ODP 0 0 0.055 

Flammability limit in air (1 atm) vol% none none none 

Inhalation exposure (8 hour day & 40 

hour week) ppm 1000 1000 1000 

 

(1) Bubble Point 

Refrigerant Solutions Ltd 

8 Murieston Road 

Hale 

Altrincham 

Cheshire WA15 9ST 

Tel: (+44)(0) 161 926 9876 

Fax: (+44)(0) 161 926 9875 

E-mail: rs@refsols.com
Ninth Court of Appeals

BE IT REMEMBERED:

THAT at the term of the Honorable Ninth Court of Appeals of the State of Texas, 

begun and holden at Beaumont on the 1st day of January, A.D. 2013, present, Chief Justice 

STEVE MCKEITHEN and Justices DAVID B. GAULTNEY, CHARLES KREGER and 

HOLLIS HORTON.

“Pursuant to and in compliance with an Order of the Supreme Court of Texas, 

dated October 17, 2013, it is ordered that these causes be transferred to the Fourteenth Court of 

Appeals, at Houston, Texas, and that the Clerk of this Court certify all orders made in this Court, 

and transmit all records and papers in said cause to the Clerk of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals.

09-13-429-CR Hoke Henry Eberhardt Jr. v. State of Texas

09-13-430-CR Hoke Henry Eberhardt Jr. v. State of Texas

09-13-433-CV Carolyn Warrick v. Motiva Enterprises, L.L.C.

09-13-435-CV Charles Freeman Jr. v. Kent Dickerson, et al

09-13-436-CR Quincy Michael McCray v. State of Texas

09-13-440-CR Michael Carroll Pounders v. State of Texas

09-13-445-CV Big Masonry, L.L.C. v. Edwards Living Trust

09-13-448-CV Jon T. Neubaum et al v. Brenton M. Stanfield, et al

09-13-449-CR Jorge Albert Pavon-Maldonado v. State of Texas

09-13-451-CV In Re Commitment of William Michael Wirtz

I, Carol Anne Harley, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of 

Texas, at the City of Beaumont, herein certify that the foregoing is a true copy of this Court’s 

order entered from this Court to the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas at 

Houston as appears of record in Minute Book Volume 18.”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the seal of this Court 

at Beaumont this 21st of October 2013.

__________________________

Carol Anne Harley

Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Huub Crijns, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F ofTriple P N.V.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)[Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transitioninstructions contained in SEC Release 34-47986];

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.   The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | May 26, 2004 | /s/ Huub Crijns                 |
|--------|--------------|---------------------------------|
|   |         | Huub Crijns                     |
|   |         | Interim Chief Executive Officer |
|   |         | (principal executive officer)   |

 

----
#### § 101-29.209 Purchase description.

A *purchase description* is any informal product description prepared for one-time use only or for small purchases when issuance of a formal product description is not cost effective.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              LEISUREPLANET HOLDINGS, LTD. (formerly known as First
                            South Africa Corp., Ltd.)
                                     Bermuda
                                Listed on NASDAQ

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              81% OF                                              100% OF                                      100% OF
        LEISUREPLANET.COM                          FIRST SOUTH AFRICAN HOLDINGS (PTY.) LTD.               FIRST SOUTH AFRICA
             ENGLAND                                            SOUTH AFRICA                          MANAGEMENT CORP. DELAWARE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   100% OF               100% OF                                   51.5% OF
LEISUREPLANET          LEISUREPLAN                         FIRST LIFESTYLE HOLDINGS
 (PTY.) LTD.         BELGIUM (N.V.)                   LISTED ON JOHANNESBURG STOCK EXCHANGE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              LIFESTYLE PRODUCTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                  <C>                       <C>                       <C>                          <C>
                                               Republic Umbrellas            Piemans Pantry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Galactex Outdoor             Astoria Bakery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   SA Leisure            Seemanns Meat Products
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Tradewinds Parasol             Gull Foods
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Fifers Bakery
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Noel Castellano and Martin Viteri) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Noel Castellano and Martin Viteri.

Dated this 9th day of August 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 186 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2023 Page 1 of 1
# Calculator Template

&"-,Bold"&20&F	

&F, &A		updated by the Office of Grant Administration, January 2021

# Samples

&"-,Bold"&20&F	

&F, &A		updated by the Office of Grant Administration, January 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al. on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants. 

__________________________________/

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR A BRIEF STATUS 

CONFERENCE

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Request for a Brief Status 

Conference (ECF No. __). The Court has considered the motion and the pertinent portions of the 

record.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. A status conference is scheduled in this matter for [DATE] at [TIME].

2. The Court will circulate Zoom instructions by separate Order in advance of the 

conference 

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this __ day of March, 2023.

___________________________________

K. MICHAEL MOORE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 71-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2023 Page 1 of 1
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5194

To prohibit the possession of a firearm by an individual who has committed

an act of juvenile delinquency that would be a violent felony if committed

by an adult.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 2000

Mr. MOORE (for himself, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. UDALL of New

Mexico, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. MCGOVERN,

Mr. HOLT, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. DANNER, and

Mr. HUTCHINSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the possession of a firearm by an individual

who has committed an act of juvenile delinquency that

would be a violent felony if committed by an adult.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Guns For Violent

5 Perpetrators Act’’.
2

•HR 5194 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON POSSESSION OF A FIREARM BY AN

2 INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS COMMITTED AN ACT

3 OF JUVENILE DELINQUENCY THAT WOULD

4 BE A VIOLENT FELONY IF COMMITTED BY AN

5 ADULT.

6 Section 922(g)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

7 amended—

8 (1) by striking the comma; and

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘, or adjudicated as having

10 committed an act of juvenile delinquency that would

11 be a crime of violence (as defined in section

12 924(c)(3)) and punishable by imprisonment for such

13 term if committed by an adult’’ before the semi14 colon.

Æ
#### § 102-37.525 What should a holding agency do if it wants a public airport to receive priority consideration for excess personal property it has reported to GSA?

A holding agency interested in giving priority consideration to a public airport should annotate its reporting document to make GSA aware of this interest. In an addendum to the document, include the name of the requesting airport, specific property requested, and a brief description of how the airport intends to use the property.
#### § 102-36.245 Are we accountable for the personal property that has been reported excess, and who is responsible for the care and handling costs?

Yes, you are accountable for the excess personal property until the time it is picked up by the designated recipient or its agent. You are responsible for all care and handling charges while the excess personal property is going through the screening and disposal process.
#### § 959.1 Authority for rules.

These rules are issued by the Judicial Officer of the U.S. Postal Service pursuant to authority delegated by the Postmaster General.
§ 102-33.75 What other guidance is available to us in planning to acquire Government aircraft? You can find guidance for acquisition planning in: ( a ) The “Aviation Planning Desk Guide” (available at *http://www.gsa.gov/aviationpolicy*) and
( b ) OMB's “Capital Programming Guide,” which is a supplement to OMB Circular A-11 (*http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb*).
``

| |  |  | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Ross Wilmot, chief executive officer and chief financial
 officer of ASP Ventures Corp. (Registrant) certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Annual
 Report on Form 10-KSB (Report) of Registrant;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this
 Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
 to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
 misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the
 financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all
 material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
 of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing
 and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
 for the Registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure
 controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,
 to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
 is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report
 is being prepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness
 of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about
 the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
 this Report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this Report
 any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants
 most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
 has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control
 over financial reporting; and

5.     I have disclosed, based
 on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board
 of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficiencies
 and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
 are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
 report financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not
 material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
 internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2004

/s/ Ross Wilmot

Ross Wilmot, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
 Officer
§ 102-34.55 Are there fleet average fuel economy standards we must meet? ( a ) Yes. 49 U.S.C. 32917 and Executive Order 12375 require that each executive agency meet the fleet average fuel economy standards in place as of January 1 of each fiscal year. The standards for passenger automobiles are prescribed in 49 U.S.C. 32902(b). The Department of Transportation publishes the standards for light trucks and amendments to the standards for passenger automobiles at *http://www.dot.gov .*
( b ) These standards do not apply to military design motor vehicles, law enforcement motor vehicles, or motor vehicles intended for emergency rescue.
#### § 102-118.405 Who conducts a transportation postpayment audit?

The Administrator of General Services (GSA) has a congressionally mandated responsibility under 31 U.S.C. 3726 to perform oversight on transportation bills. The GSA Transportation Audits Division accomplishes this oversight by conducting postpayment audits of all agencies' transportation bills.