alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5400 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5400

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the retail tax on 
  heavy trucks and trailers to exclude tractors suitable for use with 
                vehicles weighing 33,000 pounds or less.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 2000

  Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma (for himself and Mr. Watkins) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the retail tax on 
  heavy trucks and trailers to exclude tractors suitable for use with 
                vehicles weighing 33,000 pounds or less.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RETAIL TAX ON HEAVY TRUCKS AND TRAILERS TO 
              EXCLUDE TRACTORS SUITABLE FOR USE WITH VEHICLES WEIGHING 
              33,000 POUNDS OR LESS.

    (a) Tractors Subject to Tax Only if Suitable for Use With Heavy 
Trailers or Semitrailers.--Paragraph (2) of section 4051(a) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusion for trucks 
weighing 33,000 pounds or less) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Exclusion for trucks, etc., weighing 33,000 pounds or 
        less.--The tax imposed by paragraph (1) shall not apply to any 
        article described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (E) of paragraph 
        (1)--
                    ``(A) which is suitable for use with a vehicle 
                which has a gross vehicle weight of 33,000 pounds or 
                less (as determined under regulations prescribed by the 
                Secretary), and
                    ``(B) which, in the case of an article described in 
                subparagraph (E), is not [used/intended for use?] in a 
                trade or business.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on January 1, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
----

|                                                  |   | THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED |    |   | THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------|---------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |   | March      1,        |    |   | March      3,           |   |   | March      1, |   |   | March      3, |   |
|                                                  |   | 2008                 |    |   | 2007                    |   |   | 2008 |   |   | 2007 |   |
|                                                  |   |                 |    |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      income for computing income per common share |   | $                    | 23,287  |   |                    | $      | 52,298 |   |   | $ | 75,809 |   |   | $ | 75,876 |   |
|                                                  |   |                 |    |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                  |   |                 |    |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number of common shares         |   |                 | 783,453 |   |                    |   | 790,842 |   |   |   | 783,888 |   |   |   | 791,920 |   |
|                                                  |   |                 |    |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                  |   |                 |    |   |                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      income per common share                      |   | $                    | 0.030   |   |                    | $      | 0.066 |   |   | $ | 0.097 |   |   | $ | 0.096 |   |

----
#### § 102-34.265 May we keep a Government-owned motor vehicle even though the standard permits replacement?

Yes. The replacement standard is a minimum only, and therefore, you may keep a Government-owned motor vehicle longer than shown in § 102-34.270 if the motor vehicle can be operated without excessive maintenance costs or substantial reduction in resale value.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.1


                  [SUPERIOR TELECOM INC. LETTERHEAD]




                                                           As of May 1, 1999



The Alpine Group, Inc.
1790 Broadway, Suite 1500
New York, NY 10019-1412

    Re:  SERVICES AGREEMENT DATED AS OF OCTOBER 2, 1996 BY AND BETWEEN
         THE ALPINE GROUP, INC. AND SUPERIOR TELECOM INC. AS AMENDED AND
         EXTENDED TO DATE (AS SO AMENDED AND EXTENDED, THE "AGREEMENT")
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

    This will confirm our agreement in modification and extension of the
captioned Agreement as follows:

1.  Section 3(b) of the Agreement (as previously amended by letter agreement
    dated as of May 1, 1997) is hereby further amended by adding the
    following after the first sentence thereof; provided that, commencing
    September 1, 2000 through and including December 31, 2001, such fee shall
    increase to $5,000,000 per year.

2.  Section 4(a) of the Agreement (as previously amended by letter agreement
    dated as of May 1, 1997 and extended by letter agreement dated as of May 1,
    1998), is hereby amended by inserting the following after the first
    sentence thereof:

        "Effective from and after May 1, 1999 and through August 31, 2000,
        Superior shall pay Alpine the fee provided for under Section 3(b)
        (the "Fee") quarterly in advance; for the period commencing September
        1, 2000 and through August 31, 2001, Superior shall pay Alpine the
        Fee semi-annually in advance; and for the period commencing September
        1, 2001 through December 31, 2001, Alpine shall pay the Fee in
        advance."

3.  Section 9 of the Agreement is amended so that the automatic termination
    date stated therein shall be December 31, 2001.

    The amendments provided for herein have been approved by the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors of Superior TeleCom Inc.

    As modified hereby, the Agreement is hereby expressly ratified and
confirmed.

<PAGE>

The Alpine Group, Inc.
Page 2


    If the foregoing conforms with your understanding of the agreement
reached between us, kindly execute a copy of this letter so indicating.


                                          Very truly yours,

                                          SUPERIOR TELECOM INC.


                                          By:   /s/ Steven S. Elbaum
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Steven S. Elbaum
                                          Its:  Chief Executive Officer


Agreed to as of the date first
hereinabove set forth

THE ALPINE GROUP, INC.


By:   /s/ Bragi F. Schut
      ------------------------------
      Bragi F. Schut
Its:  Executive Vice President
§ 102-74.305 How must Federal agencies assign available parking spaces to their employees? Federal agencies must assign available parking spaces to their employees using the following order of priority: ( a ) Severely disabled employees (see definition in § 102-71.20 of this chapter).
( b ) Executive personnel and persons who work unusual hours.
( c ) Vanpool/carpool vehicles.
( d ) Privately owned vehicles of occupant agency employees that are regularly used for Government business at least 12 days per month and that qualify for reimbursement of mileage and travel expenses under Government travel regulations.
( e ) Other privately owned vehicles of employees, on a space-available basis. (In locations where parking allocations are made on a zonal basis, GSA and affected agencies may cooperate to issue additional rules, as appropriate.)
----

|                                                                            |   | THIRTEEN      WEEKS ENDED |    |   | TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|---------|--------|------------------------|--------|
|                                                                            |   | November 29,         |    |   | December 1,       |   |   | November 29, |   |   | December 1, |   |
|                                                                            |   | 2008                      |    |   | 2007                   |   |   | 2008 |   |   | 2007 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      income for computing  income per common share                |   | $                         | 30,115  |   |                   | $      | 3,694 |   |   | $ | 27,456 |   |   | $ | 52,522 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number of common shares outstanding during each    period |   |                      | 781,696 |   |                   |   | 783,836 |   |   |   | 781,717 |   |   |   | 784,758 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      income per common share                                                |   | $                         | 0.039   |   |                   | $      | 0.005 |   |   | $ | 0.035 |   |   | $ | 0.067 |   |

----
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 644

To establish requirements for the cancellation of automobile insurance policies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To establish requirements for the cancellation of automobile

insurance policies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SALES OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE POLICIES.

4 No State shall authorize the sale of automobile insur5 ance policies unless such policies are subject to cancella6 tion in accordance with section 2.

7 SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE POLI8 CIES.

9 A paid-up policy of automobile insurance may be can10 celed only if—
2

HR 644 IH

1 (1) a written notice of cancellation is mailed or

2 delivered to the last known mailing address of the

3 named insured as shown in the records of the in4 surer at least 180 days before the effective date of

5 the cancellation;

6 (2) the insurer shows that the named insured

7 had the insured’s driver’s license suspended or re8 voked; or

9 (3) the insurer shows that the name insured

10 has been convicted of, or forfeited bail for, any ac11 tion arising out of or in connection with the oper12 ation of a motor vehicle that is grounds for suspen13 sion or revocation of a driver’s license.

14 SEC. 3. RENEWAL OF AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE POLICIES.

15 An insurer shall mail or deliver to an insured a writ16 ten notice of non-renewal of an automobile insurance pol17 icy at the last known mailing address of the named in18 sured as shown in the records of the insurer at least 180

19 days before the expiration of the policy.

20 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT.

21 (a) INSURER.—An insurer which violates section 1,

22 2, or 3 shall with respect to the insured involved in such

23 violation—

24 (1) accept an application or written request for

25 automobile insurance coverage at a rate and on the
3

HR 644 IH

1 same terms and conditions as are available to its in2 sureds under the insurer’s automobile insurance cov3 erage;

4 (2) reinstate the automobile insurance coverage

5 for such insured to the end of the applicable policy

6 period.

7 (b) OTHERS.—Any person who violates section 1, 2,

8 or 3 shall be subject to—

9 (1) a cease and desist order issued in accord10 ance with section 5 of the Federal Trade Commis11 sion Act (15 U.S.C. 45); or

12 (2) a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000.

Æ
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Stena AB (publ) (the ‘‘Company’’) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), Dan Sten Olsson, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Svante Carlsson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Dan Sten Olsson                    Name: Dan Sten OlssonTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 30, 2007

/s/ Svante Carlsson                     Name: Svante CarlssonTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: April 30, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5462

To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish the placing of sexual

explicit photographs on the Internet without the permission of the persons photographed.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 2000

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish the placing

of sexual explicit photographs on the Internet without

the permission of the persons photographed.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Personal Pictures Pro5 tection Act of 2000’’.
2

•HR 5462 IH

1 SEC. 2. SEXUALLY EXPLICIT PHOTOGRAPHS ON THE INTER2 NET.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part I of title 18, United States

4 Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 79 the fol5 lowing:

6 ‘‘CHAPTER 80—PERSONAL PRIVACY

‘‘Sec.

‘‘1631. Sexually explicit photographs on the Internet.

7 ‘‘§ 1631. Sexually explicit photographs on the Internet

8 ‘‘Whoever, with the intent to embarrass or cause

9 emotional distress to another person places on a computer

10 photographs of the sexually explicit conduct (as defined

11 in section 2256) of that person so that such photographs

12 are accessible on the Internet, without the permission of

13 that other person, shall be fined under this title or impris14 oned not more than 2 years, or both.’’.

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters

16 for part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended by

17 inserting after the item relating to chapter 79 the fol18 lowing new item:

‘‘80. Personal privacy.’’.

Æ
22-mj-03456-McAliley

Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 1 of 8
August 26, 2022

22-mj-03456-McAliley

Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 7 of 8
26th

Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 8 of 8
§ 102-117.250 What are my responsibilities after shipping the household goods? ( a ) Each agency should develop an evaluation survey for the employee to complete following the move.
( b ) Under the CHAMP program, you must counsel employees to fill out their portion of the GSA Form 3080, Household Goods Carrier Evaluation Report. This form reports the quality of the TSP's performance. TSPs generate the GSA Form 3080 within GSA's Transportation Management Services Solution (TMSS) system and send the employee a link to complete the form.
[65 FR 60060, Oct. 6, 2000; 65 FR 81405, Dec. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32323, May 31, 2022]
Regulatory Evaluation

Dock et No. FAA

- Direct o rate Identifier: -AD

Add th e work hours. ports cost, and n umb e r**(~l** 

### U.S. registeredproduct s to the table 

### be!mt·. When you ore 

### fill is lied. 

### did on the
.. Update 

### Fields · . , hull on to automaticallyjlll in the totals
. 

### Update Fields 

## j
Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e
. g . , aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cos t Tota l Costs Number of Tota l Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

## u .s. for U .S. Fleet Do not includ e oncondition costs here access, testing , (@$85/h parts) Regi s tered and close-up) our) Products Inspection 

### 296 , 

### 57 ' i 

### ,, '' !\ Oi I (I 0 0 (H) 

### ' () 0!1 !I ttl 

## '· (),) (I (I<) '' pq p !)ll ) 'I I 

### u f·fl I) ()I) •' HI 1 •HI ( 0 { ,I,{ 

### uo o) I)IJ ' fl. Oil tl 0'1 lj (ill !) (JP 

## " () ( h O(ll ' , r 1) {. () ( 111) ' I t }\! •II i I ( t It(} , r t, ' (\ li( I) (l(l '· I t)( I () (} I 'l•f• t) !HI 'J.lf I 

### ' \I (I(: PI n n 1 ( II 

# . )I PO• fJ (\ll ' {) lll) ( () I'll • 'if.

.... I),() I ' I {Ill 

### " I Hi The known number of products in compliance: 

### Number Total Costs of compliance for U
. S. fleet: $1 ,434,120 Costs covered under war ra n ty 

## (ifknown) $**'vVarrant~** On-Condit i on Costs:
.. Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g. , Inspection , (include access, (@$85 / hour)

replacement) testing , and closeup) R

epa ir S ee comment IJ below (Ill ·, IS pec ial con s id era tion s for Eco no mic Anal ys is (Use thisfield to explain anythin g in th e Estimated Costs table thai was assumed or mi g ht not be obvious
. This field can also be used to explain warranty cos ts ) : 

### Cost of repa irs ar e n ot prov ided. Size of area n ee ding r epair must be detennined in orde r to determin e material and work-hour costs. Materia l s for repa irs are provided by the operators. Exec uti ve O r d er 12866: 

### Co uld the AD be considered a "s ignificant regulatory ac tio n "?

# ~ YES* 0**NO~** 

### *E xp l anation: DOT R e gula tory Po li c ies a nd Pro ce dures : 

### I s the AD significant? • YES* 

### 0 NO 

### IZI *Exp l anation: Reg ul atory F l e xibili ty Act : 

### Wi ll th e AD have a sign i ticant econom ic impact on a substantia l numb er of small entities? Explai n for e i

ther a Yes or No answe r .

# · YES 

### 0 NO 

### IZI Explanat ion: I nt r as t ate Aviation in A las ka : 

### T hi s AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to includ e s pec ific requirements for a ircraft operated in Ala s ka where aviation m igh t be the on l y mode of tr a nsportation? • YES* 

## 0 NO 

### 181 *Explanation:
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-1934

Lower Tribunal No. 2022-CC-007845-O

_____________________________

FLORIDA WELLNESS & REHABILITATION CENTER OF HOMESTEAD a/a/o HELY 

FERRIGNY,

Appellant, 

v.

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the County Court for Orange County.

Andrew A. Bain, Judge.

July 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

STARGEL, WHITE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Chad A. Barr and Dalton Gray, of Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., Altamonte 

Springs, for Appellant.

Kenneth P. Hazouri, of deBeaubien, Simmons, Knight, Mantzaris, & Neal, LLP, of 

Orlando, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### § 101-26.501-9 Centralized motor vehicle leasing program.

GSA has a centralized leasing program to provide an additional source of motor vehicle support to all Federal agencies. This program relieves Federal agencies that use it from both the time constraints and administrative costs associated with independently entering into lease contracts. The centralized leasing program covers subcompact, compact, and midsize sedans, station wagons, and certain types of light trucks (pickups and vans). Participation in the centralized leasing program is mandatory on all executive agencies of the Federal Government (excluding the Department of Defense and the U.S. Postal Service) within the 48 contiguous States and Washington, DC. However, agencies must obtain GSA authorization to lease in accordance with § 101-39.205 prior to using these established mandatory use contracts. For further information on existing contracts, including vehicles covered, rates, and terms and conditions of the contract(s), contact General Services Administration (FCA), Washington, DC 20406.

[52 FR 29525, Aug. 10, 1987]
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William A. Houlihan, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
         Metris Master Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
         in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
         with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and
         except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
         obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
         reports.


Date: March 16, 2005
                                           METRIS RECEIVABLES, INC., as
                                           originator of the Metris Master Trust


                                           By:/s/William A. Houlihan
                                           Name:  William A. Houlihan
                                           Title: President