alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001101816
<NAME>     Peoplesway.com
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         636
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           102,366
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      252,272
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    15,607
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,366
<SALES>                                    316,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           316,040
<CGS>                                      214,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              214,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           267,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (166,513)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (166,513)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (166,513)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.017)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.017)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

      In connection with the Annual Report of SiVault Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Mahoney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                /s/ John Mahoney
Dated: April 24, 2006                           --------------------------
                                                John Mahoney,
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
RETURN OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN District of Florida

MONICA ECHEVERRI

SPS #1539

OJF SERVICES, INC.

13727 S.W. 152nd Street

P.M.B. 354

Miami, FL 33177

(786) 293-5750

Our Job Serial Number: OJF-2022021388

Copyright © 1992-2022 DreamBuilt Software, Inc. - Process Server's Toolbox V8.2k

Case Number: 22-CV-61826-AHS

OJF2022021388

Plaintiff:

HOWARD MICHAEL CAPLAN

vs.

Defendant:

ENTERPRISE AUTO SERVICE, INC., ET AL

For:

Ronald E. Stern

THE ADVOCACY LAW FIRM, P.A.

1250 East Hallandale Beach Blvd

Suite 503

Hallandale Beach, FL 33009

Received by OJF SERVICES, INC. on the 29th day of September, 2022 at 8:49 am to be served on ENTERPRISE AUTO

SERVICE, INC. C/O REGISTERED AGENT: ALLAN E. DYER, 2804 NW 30 AVE., FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33311.

I, MONICA ECHEVERRI, do hereby affirm that on the 29th day of October, 2022 at 2:48 am, I:

CORPORATE - REGISTERED AGENT: served by delivering a true copy of the SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT with the 

date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: Allan Dyer as Registered Agent At the address of: 10155 NW 31 

CT, SUNRISE, FL for ENTERPRISE AUTO SERVICE, INC. C/O REGISTERED AGENT: ALLAN E. DYER, and informed 

said person of the contents therein, in compliance with either federal or state statutes.

Additional Information pertaining to this Service:

10/5/2022 4:10 pm Attempted service at 2804 NW 30 AVE., FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33311,

As per next door bay is vacant

I CERTIFY THAT I AM OVER THE AGE OF 18, HAVE NO INTEREST IN THE ABOVE ACTION, AND THAT I AM A 

SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER APPOINTED BY THE SHERIFF, IN GOOD STANDING, IN THE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN 

WHICH PROCESS WAS SERVED. "UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, I DECLARE THAT I HAVE READ THE 

FOREGOING (DOCUMENT) AND THAT THE FACTS STATED IN IT ARE TRUE, 92.525. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES 

ARE NOW PERMITTED PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTE 48.21. NOTARY ARE NOT REQUIRED PURSUANT TO 

F.S. 92.525(2). 

Case 0:22-cv-61826-AHS Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-75.296 When may a landholding agency other than GSA be the disposal agency for real and related personal property? A landholding agency may be the disposal agency for real and related personal property when— ( a ) The agency has statutory authority to dispose of real and related personal property;
( b ) The agency has delegated authority from GSA to dispose of real and related personal property; or
( c ) The agency is disposing of— ( 1 ) Leases, licenses, permits, easements, and other similar real estate interests held by agencies in non-Government-owned real property;
( 2 ) Government-owned improvements, including fixtures, structures, and other improvements of any kind as long as the underlying land is not being disposed; or
( 3 ) Standing timber, embedded gravel, sand, stone, and underground water, without the underlying land.
#### § 102-37.235 What type of information must a SASP provide when requesting surplus property for cannibalization?

When a donee wants surplus property to cannibalize, include the following statement on the SF 123: “Line Item Number(s)___requested for cannibalization.”. In addition to including this statement, provide a detailed justification concerning the need for the components or accessories and an explanation of the effect removal will have on the item. GSA will approve requests for cannibalization only when it is clear from the justification that disassembly of the item for use of its component parts will provide greater potential benefit than use of the item in its existing form.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.204-1 General.

No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program to which this subpart applies.
#### § 3030.280 Applicability.

This subpart is applicable whenever the Postal Service proposes to adjust a rate associated with a workshare discount. For the purpose of this subpart, the cost avoided by the Postal Service for not providing the applicable service refers to the amount identified in the most recently applicable Annual Compliance Determination, unless the Commission otherwise provides.
# Úřední věstník C 20A/27.

| | ISSN 1725-5163 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 20A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 5227. ledna 2009 |

ISSN 1725-5163

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 20A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 5227. ledna 2009

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ A INSTITUCÍ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Evropský parlament |
| 2009/C 020A/01 | Rozhodnutí | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ A INSTITUCÍ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropský parlament

2009/C 020A/01

Rozhodnutí

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ A INSTITUCÍ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropský parlament

| 27.1.2009 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 20/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2009

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 20/1

---

ROZHODNUTÍ

(2009/C 20 A/01)

GENERÁLNÍ TAJEMNÍK EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU,

s ohledem na služební řád úředníků Evropských společenství a pracovní řád ostatních zaměstnanců Společenství stanovený nařízením Rady (EHS, Euratom, ESUO) č. 259/68 a naposledy pozměněné nařízením Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 723/2004, a zejména na článek 30 služebního řádu,

s ohledem na rozhodnutí předsednictva o stanovení orgánu oprávněného ke jmenování naposledy pozměněné dne 26. října 2004,

s ohledem na vyhlášení všeobecných výběrových řízení č.:

PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A, PE/98/A, PE/99/A, PE/66/S, PE/67/S, PE/72/S, PE/80/S, PE/87/S, PE/88/S, PE/89/S, PE/91/S, A/94, A/95, A/96-P, A/97-P, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161, EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169, EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157, PE/32/B, PE/34/B, PE/69/S, B/174-P, B/175-P, B/176-P, B/177-P, PE/133/C, PE/134/C, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006,

s ohledem na stanovisko smíšeného výboru přijaté na schůzi dne 19. listopadu 2008,

ROZHODL

Článek 1

Doba platnosti seznamů způsobilých uchazečů všeobecných výběrových řízení č.:

| | PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A, PE/98/A, PE/99/A, PE/66/S, PE/67/S, PE/72/S, PE/80/S, |
| --- | --- |

PE/94/A, PE/95/A, PE/96/A, PE/97/A, PE/98/A, PE/99/A, PE/66/S, PE/67/S, PE/72/S, PE/80/S,

| | PE/91/S, A/94, A/95, A/96-P, A/97-P, |
| --- | --- |

PE/91/S, A/94, A/95, A/96-P, A/97-P,

| | EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169, |
| --- | --- |

EUR/A/167, EUR/A/169,

| | EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157, |
| --- | --- |

EUR/LA/156, EUR/LA/157,

| | PE/34/B, PE/69/S, B/174-P, B/175-P, B/176-P, B/177-P, |
| --- | --- |

PE/34/B, PE/69/S, B/174-P, B/175-P, B/176-P, B/177-P,

| | PE/133/C, PE/134/C, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006 |
| --- | --- |

PE/133/C, PE/134/C, C/348, AST/1/2005, AST/1/2006

se prodlužuje do 31. prosince 2009.

Článek 2

Doba platnosti seznamů způsobilých uchazečů všeobecných výběrových řízení č.:

| | PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/87/S, PE/88/S, PE/89/S, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161, |
| --- | --- |

PE/90/A, PE/91/A, PE/87/S, PE/88/S, PE/89/S, EUR/A/155, EUR/A/158, EUR/A/159, EUR/A/161,

| | PE/32/B |
| --- | --- |

PE/32/B

se neprodlužuje.

V Lucemburku dne 8. prosince 2008.

Harald RØMER

generální tajemník

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**504 CAF 12-02316** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF BEVERLY GRIFFIN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JESSICA GRIFFIN, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

MINDY L. MARRANCA, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

TERRANCE C. BRENNAN, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

MARY ANNE CONNELL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, BUFFALO.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Paul G. Buchanan, J.), entered September 7, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted sole custody of respondent’s children to petitioner.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Erie County, for further proceedings on the petition.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order granting sole custody of the subject children to petitioner, a nonparent, respondent mother contends that Family Court erred in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether extraordinary circumstances exist and, if so, to determine the best interests of the children. We agree, and we therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Family Court for the requisite evidentiary hearing. It is well settled that, “as between a parent and a nonparent, the parent has a superior right to custody that cannot be denied unless the nonparent establishes that the parent has relinquished that right because of ‘surrender, abandonment, persisting neglect, unfitness or other like extraordinary circumstances’ ” ( Matter of Gary G. v Roslyn P. , 248 AD2d 980, 981, quoting Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys , 40 NY2d 543, 544). “ ‘[T]he nonparent has the burden of proving that extraordinary circumstances exist, and until such circumstances are shown, the court does not reach the issue of the best interests of the child[ren]’ ” ( Matter of Ruggieri v Bryan , 23 AD3d 991, 992). Here, the court “deprived a biological parent of custody of [her] child[ren] without the . . . [requisite evidentiary] hearing” on the issues of extraordinary circumstances and best interests ( Matter of Stiles v Orshal , 290 AD2d 824, 825). Instead of conducting the hearing on the date it was to**-2- 504 CAF 12-02316** 

begin, the court asked the parents what witnesses would be called on their behalf. When the parents responded that they would be testifying but had no other witnesses, the court stated that it found no triable issues of fact and granted the nonparent’s petition for custody. Thus, the court failed to place the burden of proof on the nonparent to prove that extraordinary circumstances exist. Finally, we note that the home study on which the court relied was potentially out of date when the court granted the petition.

Entered: May 9, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### § 102-117.155 Where do I go for further information about coastwise laws?

You may refer to 46 U.S.C. Chapter 551, 19 CFR 4.80, DOT MARAD (202-336-4610 or *www.cargo.marad@dot.gov*), the U.S. Coast Guard or U.S. Customs and Border Protection for further information on exceptions to the coastwise laws.

[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 51394, Aug. 20, 2010; 87 FR 32322, May 31, 2022]
**Exhibit 4.6****SECOND AMENDMENT TO IMMUNITY AGREEMENT**     Whereas Motorola Inc., (“MOTOROLA”) and ST Assembly Test Services, Ltd. (“STATS”)entered into an Immunity Agreement on October 18, 1996 involving BGA packages (“IMMUNITYAGREEMENT”);     Whereas the IMMUNITY AGREEMENT was amended on April 22, 2003 (“First Amendment”) to includerenewing the IMMUNITY AGREEMENT and changing in the ASSEMBLY HOUSE SALES calculation from a numberbased on BGA pads sold to a number based on total consolidated gross sales revenues; and     Whereas Freescale, Semiconductor Inc. (“FREESCALE”) and STATS ChipPAC Ltd.(“STATS CHIPPAC”) are now parties to the IMMUNITY AGREEMENT;     Now therefore, FREESCALE and STATS CHIPPAC agree to amend the above-identified IMMUNITYAGREEMENT as follows (“Second Amendment”):1. In Section 1, replace old Section 1.8 with new Section 1.8 below:1.8 ASSEMBLY HOUSE SALES shall mean the total consolidated gross sales revenues ofSTATS CHIPPAC., and its subsidiaries providing BGA packaging services as reported by STATSCHIPPAC., or its parent company, if any, to the relevant Singapore government authorities orto the public, as the case may be. ASSEMBLY HOUSE SALES shall not include the sale of assemblyservices to Intel, Inc. For clarification, ASSEMBLY HOUSE SALES shall include the sale ofassembly services to FREESCALE.2. In Section 4, after Section 4.5 add new section 4.6 below:4.6 ASSEMBLY HOUSE shall keep full, clear, and accurate records with respect to ASSEMBLY HOUSESALES. FREESCALE shall have the right through a mutually agreed upon independent auditor toexamine and audit no more than once a year at a mutually agreeable time all such records andsuch other records and account as may under recognized accounting practices containinformation bearing upon the amount of royalty payable to FREESCALE under this Agreement.Prompt Adjustment shall be made to compensate for any errors or omissions disclosed by suchexamination or audit. Neither such right to examine and audit nor the right to receive suchadjustment shall be affected by any statement to the contrary appearing on a check orotherwise. FREESCALE shall be responsible for the compensation of the auditor.All other terms and conditions of the above-identified IMMUNITY AGREEMENT remain the sameIndicating their agreement to the foregoing, the parties have hereto executed this extension of theabove-identified IMMUNITY AGREEMENT in duplicate.        Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Order 2013

- 8

- 28 Served: August 30, 2013 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 30 th of August, 2013

Essential Air Service at

KAMUELA , HAWAII

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET OST

- 1997

- 2833

Order Extending Service Obligation

S ummary By this Order, the Department extends the Essential Air Serv i ce (EAS) ob l igation of Pacific Wings, LLC

, at Kamuela

, Hawaii , for an additional 30 days, th r ough October 10

, 201 3 , or until Mokulele inaugurates service, whichever occurs first.

Background On March 14, 2013

, Pacific Wings filed a 90

- day notice of intent to suspend its subsidy

free EAS at Kamuela

, Hawaii . Order 201 3

- 4

- 17

, April 25, 2013 , prohi bited Pacific Wings from suspending service through July 12 , 201 3, consisting of twelve nonstop round trips per week to Kahului (OGG), with 9

- seat Cessna Caravan aircraft , and requested proposals for replacement service

. By Order 2013

- 7

- 3, July 2, 2013, w e selected Mokulele Flight Services, Inc., d/b/a Mokulele Ai rlines, to provide EAS to Kamuela. Pacific Wings is currently held in at Kamuela by Order 2013

- 7

- 19, July 24, 2013

, through September 10, 2013

. Mokulele has indicated that it would inaugurate

se rvice on September 21, 2013. Therefore, i n accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 41734 (c) , we must extend Pacific Wings ’s ser vice obligation for an additional 30 days, thr ough October 10 , 2013, or until replacement service actually begins, whichever occurs first.

This Order is issued under authority assigned in 14 CFR Part 385.12(k)(5)

.Accordingly,

1. We require Pacific Wings, LLC. , to maintain the level of Essential A ir S ervice it was required to provide by Order 2013

- 4

- 17 , the same level it was providing when it filed notice

, thr ough October 10 , 2013 , or until Mokulele begins full EAS, whichever comes first ;

2. Th i s docket will remain open until further O rder of the Depart m ent; and

3. We will serve a copy of this O rder on the State of Hawaii , and the civ ic officials of Kamuela

, Hawaii , and on Pacific Wings, LLC.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this O rder under the Department’s Regulations, 14 CFR Part 385.3 1(a) must file such petitions within seven ( 7 ) days after the date of se rvice of this O rder.

This Order will be effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not preclude its effectiveness.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN Director Office of Aviation Analysis

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY 
PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 30,1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,270,809
<SECURITIES>                                    56,272
<RECEIVABLES>                                  293,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,732,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,440,600
<PP&E>                                       2,876,851
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,873,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,454,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,391,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,150
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,515,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,454,048
<SALES>                                      6,877,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,877,871
<CGS>                                        5,389,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,389,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,455,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,444
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,095
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,349
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,349
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.030
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.030
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.4



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser his true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may
be, of United Surgical Partners International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully
to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that each of said attorney-in-fact or its substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.




                                                /s/ John J. Wellik
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John J. Wellik


                                                February 18, 2004
§ 102-5.75 What circumstances do not establish a basis for authorizing home-to-work transportation for field work? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67866 , Aug. 22, 2024.
The following circumstances do not establish a basis for authorizing home-to-work transportation for field work: ( a ) When an employee assigned to field work is not actually performing field work.
( b ) When the employee's workday begins at his/her work; or
( c ) When the employee normally commutes to a fixed location, however far removed from his/her official duty station (for example, auditors or investigators assigned to a defense contractor plant).
Note to § 102-5.75 :
For instances where an employee is authorized home-to-work transportation under the field work provision, but performs field work only on an intermittent basis, the agency shall establish procedures to ensure that a Government passenger carrier is used only when field work is actually being performed. Although some employees' daily work station is not located in a Government office, these employees are not performing field work. Like all Government employees, employees working in a “field office” are responsible for their own commuting costs.