alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 09, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 09, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25I0002. DENNIS MALCOLM PATTERSON v. ABHAY KUMAR SINGH.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 21CV0701
·i REGISTRATION NOT TRANSFERABLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I This certificate DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION- FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION must beinthe airCERTIFICATE OF AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION craft when operated. NATIONALITY AND I AIRCRAFT SERIAL NO. REGISTRATION MARKS N 588ZR P76DCD2201 0362 MANUFACTURER AND MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF AIRCRAFT DJI PHANTOM 3 PROFESSION

ICAO Aircraft Address Code: 5i712 757 This certificate is issued for 1 ROSENTHAL STEPHEN W registration purposes S 64 ROYCROFT BLVD only and isnota S AMHERST NY 14226-4527 certificateoftiUe. U The Federal Aviation E Administration does D not determine rights of ownership as T between private 0**~pe_rson** ___ s_. ______ __ Individual 0 Itis certified that the above described aircraft has been entered on the register ofthe Federal Aviation Administration, United· States of America, in accordance with the Convention on International Civil Aviation dated December 7, 1944, and with TIUe 49, United States Code, and regulations issued thereunder. · U.S. Department I 1"'. . of Transportation 1 DATEOFISSUE August 21,2015 ·**~~_.)** .fede.ral.AitiatioG--.·

EXPIRATION DATE August 31, 2018**ADMINIST~Eia: ~ifirlliiiStf&tfon**  ·-·· AC Form 805G-3 (1ot'2010) Supenedes previous ecitions
#### § 102-41.195 How do we dispose of forfeited, voluntarily abandoned, or unclaimed firearms not retained for official use?

Report forfeited, voluntarily abandoned, or unclaimed firearms not retained for official use to the General Services Administration, Property Management Branch (7FP-8), Denver, CO 80225-0506 for disposal in accordance with § 101-42.1102-10 of the Federal Property Management Regulations in this title.
#### § 101-5.104 Economic feasibility of centralized services.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-81883-RAR

BRITTANY ROBERSON, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend 

Scheduling Order, filed on July 14, 2023. [ECF No. 74]. The Court having carefully reviewed 

the record, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED as set forth 

herein.

The deadlines set by this Court’s Scheduling Order on February 6, 2023, [ECF No. 35], 

and modified by this Court on May 10, 2023, [ECF No. 66], are hereby extended by 90 days, as 

follows:

Current Deadline Amended Deadline

July 3, 2023, deadline for completing class 

certification discovery.

October 2, 2023, deadline for completing class 

certification discovery.

July 20, 2023, Plaintiffs file motion for class 

certification.

October 18, 2023, Plaintiffs file motion for 

class certification.

October 3, 2023, deadline to exchange expert 

witness summaries or reports.

January 2, 2024, deadline to exchange expert 

witness summaries or reports.

October 17, 2023, deadline to exchange 

rebuttal expert witness summaries or reports.

January 16, 2024, deadline to exchange 

rebuttal expert witness summaries or reports.

November 7, 2023, deadline for completion of

mediation and submission of mediation report.

February 5, 2024, deadline for completion of

mediation and submission of mediation report.

November 14, 2023, deadline to file all pretrial motions.February 12, 2024, deadline to file all pre-trial 

motions.

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

December 12, 2023, deadline to submit a joint 

pre-trial stipulation, proposed jury instructions 

and verdict form, or proposed findings of fact 

and conclusions of law, as applicable, and to

file any motions in limine (other than Daubert

motions).

March 11, 2024, deadline to submit a joint pretrial stipulation, proposed jury instructions and 

verdict form, or proposed findings of fact and 

conclusions of law, as applicable, and to file 

any motions in limine (other than Daubert

motions).

This case is now set for trial during the Court’s two-week trial calendar beginning on May 

6, 2024. Counsel for all parties shall also appear at a calendar call at 11:00 A.M. on April 30, 

2024. The trial and all other proceedings in this case shall be conducted in Courtroom 11-2, 11th 

Floor, at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, 

Florida 33128.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 14th day of July, 2023.

 ________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
kodk-ex101_87.htm



CONFIDENTIAL

Exhibit (10.1)

 

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY

2013 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

 

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT

 

This Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (this “Award Agreement”) evidences an award of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) by the Company under the Eastman Kodak Company 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  Capitalized terms not defined in the Award Agreement have the meanings given to them in the Plan.

 

Name of Grantee:     <Participant Name>

 

Grant Date:              <Date>

 

Number of RSUs:      <Number of RSUs>

 

Vesting Schedule:

 


		
	
Vesting Date
	
Percentage Vesting

	
<Date>
	
100%




 

The RSUs are being granted to you as a Director in payment of your quarterly cash retainer as approved by the Committee.  The RSUs represent 75% of the quarterly cash retainer and a check for the remaining 25% will be provided to cover taxes.  

 

The RSUs are granted under the Plan, which is hereby incorporated by reference, and the RSUs are subject to all of the terms of the Plan.  You may not sell, assign, pledge, encumber or otherwise transfer the RSUs in any manner.

 

The RSUs are fully vested on the date of the grant, and the Company will issue to you one Share for each vested RSU within approximately 30 days thereafter, but in no event later than March 15th of the year following the year in which the RSUs vest.  You will not have the rights of a shareholder of the Company with respect to the Shares underlying the RSUs until the such Shares are actually issued to you.

 

The RSUs are not eligible for deferral under the Eastman Kodak Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, and any elections under such plan will not be applied to the RSUs.

 

The RSUs are intended to be exempt from Section 409A under the short-term deferral exception thereto, and this Award Agreement shall be interpreted and administered consistent with such intention.

 

By accepting the RSUs, the Grantee agrees to be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Award Agreement.

Page | 1

<Date> Award Agreement
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 118 (Monday, June 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than July 3, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President), 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Community First Financial Corporation, Plato, Missouri; to 
establish Community First Financial Services Agency, Plato, Missouri, 
and thereby engage de novo in providing tax preparation services, 
pursuant to Sec. 225.28(b)(6)(vi) of Regulation Y; any insurance agency 
activity, including the sale of annuity contracts in a town of less 
than 5,000 in population, pursuant to Sec. 228.28(b)(11)(iii) of 
Regulation Y; and in the sale of mutual funds, pursuant to 
Sec. 225.28(b)(7)(i) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 13, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-15330 Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 101-39.404 Claims in favor of the Government.

Whenever there is any indication that a party other than the operator of the GSA Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS) vehicle is at fault and that party can be reasonably identified, the agency responsible for investigating the accident shall submit all original documents and data pertaining to the accident and its investigation to the servicing GSA IFMS fleet management center. The GSA IFMS regional fleet manager, or his/her representative, will initiate the necessary action to effect recovery of the Government's claim.

[56 FR 59891, Nov. 26, 1991]
#### § 102-41.230 May SASPs pick up or store donated drug paraphernalia in their distribution centers?

No, you must release donated drug paraphernalia directly to the donee as designated on the transfer document.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15527]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. 225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than July 5, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Phillip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Tamara S. Jacobson, Rake, Iowa; to retain voting shares of Rake 
Bancorporation, Rake, Iowa, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares 
of State Savings Bank, Rake, Iowa.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Whipple Family Banking Limited Partnership, Arkadelphia, 
Arkansas; to acquire additional voting shares of Summit Bancorp, Inc., 
Arkadelphia, Arkansas, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting 
shares of Summit Bank, Arkadelphia, Arkansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 15, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-15527 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 102-74.60 Are Federal agencies required to give blind vendors priority in operating cafeterias?

Yes. Federal agencies are required to give Randolph-Sheppard vendors priority in the operation of cafeterias when the State licensing agency is in the competitive range as set forth at 34 CFR part 395.
#### § 102-40.10 What is the governing authority for this part?

40 U.S.C. 121(c) authorizes the Administrator of General Services to prescribe regulations necessary to perform functions under this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4960 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4960

  To extend the King Range National Conservation Area boundary in the 
         State of California to include the Mill Creek Forest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2000

  Mr. Thompson of California introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the King Range National Conservation Area boundary in the 
         State of California to include the Mill Creek Forest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``King Range National Conservation 
Area Boundary Expansion Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) The public lands within the King Range National 
        Conservation Area, California, are a unique public resource 
        encompassing a spectacular meeting of land and sea.
            (2) The Mill Creek Forest adjacent to the King Range 
        National Conservation Area has long been recognized as a 
        critical component of the Mattole River watershed.
            (3) The Mill Creek Forest and adjacent lands administered 
        by the Bureau of Land Management, comprising 2,515 acres of 
        public lands, contain significant stands of old-growth Douglas 
        fir that support habitat for threatened species and endangered 
        species, including the northern spotted owl, red-tailed frog, 
        and Olympic salamander.
            (4) The linkage of the Mill Creek Forest to the King Range 
        National Conservation Area will enhance outdoor recreational 
        opportunities to the northern portion of the King Range and the 
        coastal section of the Mattole River.
            (5) Extending the King Range boundary to include the Mill 
        Creek Forest will also enhance management of the natural 
        resources by connecting the headwaters of Mill Creek to the 
        Mattole River.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF KING RANGE NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA BOUNDARY.

    Section 9 of the Act of October 21, 1970 (84 Stat. 1067), is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) In addition to the lands described in subsections (a) and 
(c), there are hereby added to the King Range National Conservation 
Area the lands identified as the Mill Creek addition on the map 
entitled `King Range National Conservation Area Boundary Extension 
2000', dated March 24, 2000.''.
                                 <all>
```
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

April 19, 2012 

via email and regulations.gov 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Joint Application of Delta, KLM, and SkyWest 

 For a Statement of Authorization 

Docket DOT-OST-2004-19214 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the 

application be granted as soon as possible. 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Brett Kruger, DOT 

 Gerry Murphy, Counsel for SkyWest 

 Willem de Jonge, KLM 

 info@airlineinfo.com
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 59

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that the firearms prohibitions applicable by reason of a domestic violence misdemeanor conviction

do not apply if the conviction occurred before the prohibitions became

law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. BARR of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide that

the firearms prohibitions applicable by reason of a domestic violence misdemeanor conviction do not apply if

the conviction occurred before the prohibitions became

law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 59 IH

1 SECTION 1. FIREARMS PROHIBITIONS APPLICABLE BY

2 REASON OF A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MIS3 DEMEANOR CONVICTION NOT TO APPLY TO

4 CONVICTIONS OBTAINED BEFORE THE PRO5 HIBITIONS BECAME LAW.

6 Subsections (d)(9), (g)(9), and (s)(3)(B)(i) of section

7 922 of title 18, United States Code, are each amended

8 by inserting ‘‘, on or after September 28, 1996,’’ before

9 ‘‘of a misdemeanor’’.

Æ
X.N

%

.$ /

UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT N>y

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CivilCaseNum ber:

Francisco Rodriguez Cruz

(Writethefulnameoftheplaintifg

vs. M ichael

(Writethefulnameofthedefendant/sinthiscmse)

FILEDBY D,C,

h0k2j2222

NGES.AE.NoBuE

ctEnKtlsols'ccm

s.o.ociuk.-MIAMf

COM PLAINT IJNDER THE CIVIL RIG HTS ACT

,42U.S.C.j1983

1. PartyInform ation

A. Plaintil: Francisco Rodriguez C ruz

stan aVe rIc e generaldeliveryat

Addresg:6977 EW 7nth St9n11th M inm iFI 33143

Y 1985

earofBirth: çDonotincludeday orm onth

,pursuanttoFed.R.Civ.P5.2)

VS.

.

B lchael . Defendant'. Defendant.'

em ployee

Offk ialPosition: OfficialPosition:

8301ne51 ave

PlaceofEmployment: miamifl33138 PlaceofEmploym

ent:

(Writethefullnameofeachdefendant,oxcialpositionandplaceofemployment.. A ttach a

separatepageifyouneedadditionalspaceforadditionaldefendants. )

Case 1:22-cv-23650-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2022 Page 1 of 3
H.Statem entofClaim

Brieflydescribethefactsofyourcase. Describehow eachdefendantisinvolved, namesofother

personsinvolved,anddatesandplaces. Eachclaim shouldbestated inaseparatelynum bered

paragraph.Pleaseuseshortandplainstatenents,withseparatelynlzmberedpara> phsindicating

whythereliefrequestedshouldbegranted. DonotW udelegalarguM ntsorcitecasesorstatutes

Attachadditionalpages . , ifnecessary.

On augus IW Inesse a gIr K

un er years O age W Or Ing atrea 00

Cafe betw een 12 pm and 2 pm

111.ReliefRequested

Birieflystatewhatyouarerequestingfrom theCourt(whatdoyouwanttheCourttodo). Donot

ncludelegalargumentsorcltecasesorstam tes. Attachadditionalpages,ifnecessary.

1068dolars

Case 1:22-cv-23650-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2022 Page 2 of 3
IV.JuryDem and

Areyoudemandingajurytrial? Yes ' No

iu,dM ,

signeduus dayof 2022

%

SignatureofPlaintiF

Ideclareunderpenaltyofperj thatthe reoingistnlceandcorrect.

Executedon: 2022

SignatureofPlaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23650-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2022 Page 3 of 3
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 609 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  Union Calendar No. 21
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 609

                          [Report No. 106-36]

 To amend the Export Apple and Pear Act to limit the applicability of 
                           the Act to apples.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

Mr. Walden of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                    to the Committee on Agriculture

                             March 2, 1999

    Additional sponsors: Mr. Combest, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Hastings of 
              Washington, Mr. Simpson, and Mr. Nethercutt

                             March 2, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To amend the Export Apple and Pear Act to limit the applicability of 
                           the Act to apples.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SCOPE OF EXPORT APPLE AND PEAR ACT.

    (a) Short Title.--The Act of June 10, 1933 (7 U.S.C. 581 et seq.; 
commonly known as the Export Apple and Pear Act), is amended by adding 
at the end the following new section:
    ``Sec. 11. This Act may be cited as the `Export Apple Act'.''.
    (b) Definition of Apples.--Section 9 of such Act (7 U.S.C. 589) is 
amended by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(4) The term `apples' means fresh whole apples, whether or not 
the apples have been in storage.''.
    (c) Elimination of References to Pears.--Such Act is further 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and/or pears'' each place it appears in 
        the first section and sections 5 and 6; and
            (2) by striking ``or pears'' each place it appears in the 
        first section and sections 2, 3, and 4.
                                     





                                                  Union Calendar No. 21

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 609

                          [Report No. 106-36]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Export Apple and Pear Act to limit the applicability of 
                           the Act to apples.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 2, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`