alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 102-75.75 What is the most important consideration in evaluating a proposed transfer of excess real property?

In every case of a proposed transfer of excess real property, the most important consideration is the validity and appropriateness of the requirement upon which the proposal is based. Also, a proposed transfer must not establish a new program that has never been reflected in any previous budget submission or congressional action. Additionally, a proposed transfer must not substantially increase the level of an agency's existing programs beyond that which has been contemplated in the President's budget or by the Congress.

(Note: See Subpart I—Screening of Excess Federal Real Property (§§ 102-75.1220 through 102-75.1290) for information on screening and transfer requests.)
2018 NOFO Evidence Quality and Evaluation Capacity Standards Resource 

Evidence Quality and 

Evaluation Capacity 

Standards

Applicant Self-Assessment Key Words to 

Understand

Relevant Evaluation 

Resources, CNCS 

Resources

Relevant Core 

Curriculum Classes

The applicant’s evidence 

is of satisfactory quality. 

Applicants with no 

evidence describe an 

evidence-informed theory 

of change. 

 My program’s evidence is 

fully described, succinct, and 

coherent. All information 

described in pts. 1-7 on pg. 

16 of the NOFO is included in 

my description.

 Evidence

 No evidence

 Evidenceinformed

 Theory of 

change

 2018 ASN NOFO

 Logic models

activities and 

templates on 

Evaluation Resources 

page

 Laying the 

Groundwork

 How to Develop a 

Logic Model

The applicant’s data 

collection systems are 

sufficient to yield high 

quality process and 

outcome data. 

 My program’s processes, 

procedures, and resources 

used to collect, store, assess, 

and monitor data are clearly 

described. Where 

appropriate, concrete 

examples are provided to 

demonstrate these 

processes, procedures, and 

resources. 

 Data collection 

systems

 High quality 

data

 Process data

 Outcome data

 2018 ASN NOFO

 Building Effective 

Data Collection Plans 

Webinar

 Laying the 

Groundwork

The applicant 

demonstrates adequate 

capacity to use process 

and outcome data 

including performance 

measurement (and 

evaluation data, if 

applicable), to inform 

continuous learning and 

program improvement.

 My program’s ability to use 

data to identify areas for 

organizational or program 

improvement are clearly and 

completely described. The 

description includes 

examples or supporting 

evidence of concrete steps 

taken to create a goal, enact 

a programmatic or 

organizational change, 

implement a new process or 

procedure, or formulate a 

plan to do one of those 

things.

 Process data

 Outcome data 

 Performance 

measurement 

data

 Evaluation data

 Continuous 

learning and 

program 

improvement

 2018 ASN NOFO

 Building Effective 

Data Collection Plans 

Webinar

 Reporting and Using 

Evaluation Results
2018 NOFO Evidence Quality and Evaluation Capacity Standards Resource

The applicant’s long-term 

research agenda is aligned 

to the organization’s 

learning needs and 

position on the evidence 

continuum (evidence 

tier).

 There is a complete 

description of my program’s

research goals, research gaps, 

future research plans. This 

description aligns to my 

program’s location on the 

evidence continuum and my 

program’s evidence tier selfassessment. 

 Long-term 

research 

agenda

 Evidence 

continuum

 Evidence tier

 2018 ASN NOFO  Developing a Long 

Term Research 

Agenda

 Reporting and Using 

Evaluation Results
AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                           NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED                  THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
                                     --------------------------------       --------------------------------
                                     February 26,        February 27,       February 26,        February 27,
                                         2000                1999               2000                1999
                                      ---------           ---------          ---------           ---------
<S>                                   <C>                 <C>                <C>                 <C>
Net income for computing
  earnings per common share           ($ 39,938)          $   7,660          ($ 77,740)          ($ 13,413)
                                      =========           =========          =========           =========


Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding
   during each period                   840,962             888,316            839,457             887,094
                                      =========           =========          =========           =========

Net income per common share           ($  0.047)          $   0.009          ($  0.093)          ($  0.015)
                                      =========           =========          =========           =========
</TABLE>
# Cover Page

General Ledger

General Ledger

Federal Financial Report

Internal Controls Workbook

Income Statement

# Instructions 

# NSCHC Disallowance Summary

# image1.png
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice Application Forthcoming)

Stephen Neal Zack

Hon. Ursula Ungaro (Ret.)

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 101-26.506-4 Acceptance and processing of requests. Agency requests for interior planning and design service will be reviewed and if considered feasible, will be accepted. Upon acceptance of a request by GSA, a proposal will be furnished the requesting activity for review and approval within 30 days. The proposal will include the following: ( a ) Approximate date the work can be started;
( b ) Estimated completion date of planning and design services;
( c ) The amount to be reimbursed GSA for the services; and
( d ) Other pertinent data or recommendations.
[31 FR 9797, July 20, 1966]
§ 102-75.937 Can an easement be released or disposed of at no cost? Yes. However, agencies must consider the Government's cost of acquiring the easement and other factors when determining if the easement will be disposed of with or without monetary or other consideration. If the easement was acquired at substantial consideration, agencies must— ( a ) Determine the easement's fair market value (estimate the fair market value of the fee land without the easement and with the easement then compute the difference or compute the damage the easement caused to the fee land); and
( b ) Negotiate the highest obtainable price with the owner of the servient estate to release the easement.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARDIAL SINGH, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-71022 

Agency No. A095-630-059 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 2, 2020**

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Hardial Singh, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen and 

terminate removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de 

novo questions of law. Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 581 (9th Cir. 2016). We 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 8 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-71022 

deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s third, untimely 

motion to reopen where he failed to show he qualified for any exception to the time 

and number limits for motions to reopen. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(A), (C).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Singh’s unexhausted contention that the 

BIA erred in failing to apply equitable tolling. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 

674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (no jurisdiction to review issues where petitioner failed to 

exhaust the claim before the BIA). 

We further lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to exercise its 

sua sponte authority to reopen where Singh has not shown a legal or constitutional 

error, and the BIA provided sufficient reasoning. See Bonilla, 840 F.3d at 587-88

(this court’s review of denials of sua sponte reopening is limited to identifying 

legal or constitutional error); Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 

2010) (“What is required is merely that [the BIA] consider the issues raised, and 

announce its decision in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing court to perceive 

that it has heard and thought and not merely reacted.” (internal quotation marks 

and citation omitted)); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (“The Board has discretion to deny a 

motion to reopen even if the party moving has made out a prima facie case for 

relief.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### § 101-4.600 Notice of covered programs.

Within 60 days of September 29, 2000, each Federal agency that awards Federal financial assistance shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of the programs covered by these Title IX regulations. Each such Federal agency shall periodically republish the notice of covered programs to reflect changes in covered programs. Copies of this notice also shall be made available upon request to the Federal agency's office that enforces Title IX.
#### § 101-26.508-1 Requisitioning data processing tape available through Federal Supply Schedule contracts.

Federal Supply Schedules, FSC group 70, part XI, and FSC group 58, part V, section C, include contracts to satisfy Government requirements for those types of EDP tape and instrumentation tape (wide and intermediate band) which are most widely used. Federal agencies located within the 48 contiguous United States, Washington, DC and Hawaii (applicable to EDP tape only for Hawaii) shall procure these tapes in accordance with the provisions of the current schedules and this § 101-26.508-1. Orders not exceeding the maximum order limitations of the Federal Supply Schedules and prepared directly by activities located outside the geographical areas referenced above shall, to the extent possible, be consolidated and submitted in FEDSTRIP format to the GSA regional office supporting the geographic area in which the requisitioner is located.

[43 FR 32765, July 28, 1978]
#### § 102-74.145 What information must a Federal agency submit to GSA after the agency has identified a need for construction or alteration of a public building?

Federal agencies identifying a need for construction or alteration of a public building must provide information, such as a description of the work, location, estimated maximum cost, and justification to the Administrator of General Services.
```
[House Report 112-93]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]


112th Congress                                             Rept. 112-93
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     Part 2

======================================================================



 
   BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION TRANSFER CLARIFICATION ACT

                                _______
                                

 July 19, 2011.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

         Mr. Bachus, from the Committee on Financial Services, 
                        submitted the following

                          SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 1667]

                    REASONS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

    This supplemental report shows the updated information for 
the Committee Consideration of H.R. 1667, as reported, (H. 
Rept. 112-93):

                        COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

    The Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer 
Credit met in open session on May 4, 2011 and ordered H.R. 
1667, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Transfer 
Clarification Act, favorably reported to the Full Committee by 
a record vote of 13 yeas and 8 nays (Record vote no. FI-6).
    The Committee on Financial Services met in open session on 
May 12 and 13, 2011 and ordered H.R. 1667, the Bureau of 
Consumer Financial Protection Transfer Clarification Act, 
favorably reported to the House by a record vote of 32 yeas and 
26 nays (Record vote no. FC-39).

                                  

```
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is Amehed Rosabal García .

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the 

FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC, 

d/b/a Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively 

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River 

and the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is 

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein 

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by 

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Dated Agosto 22 , 2023. Signed:Amehed Rosabal García (Aug 22, 2023 14:18 EDT)

Printed Name: Amehed Rosabal

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: 445 Nw 4th ST Apto 1304 Miami ,FL 33128 Tel No.: 786-381-5936

Email: amehed27@gmail.com

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156 / brian@fairlawattorney.com

TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844 

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 194-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 105-60.1002 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart, the following definitions apply: ( a ) *Material* means any document, record, file or data, regardless of the physical form or the media by or through which it is maintained or recorded, which was generated or acquired by a current or former GSA employee by reason of the performance of that person's official duties or because of the person's official status, or any other tangible item, *e.g.,* personal property possessed or controlled by GSA.
( b ) *Information* means any knowledge or facts contained in material, and any knowledge or facts acquired by current or former GSA employee as part of the performance of that person's official duties or because of that person's official status.
( c ) *Demand* means any subpoena, order, or similar demand for the production or disclosure of material, information or testimony regarding such material or information, issued by a court or other authority in a judicial or administrative proceeding, excluding congressional subpoenas or demands in Federal grand jury proceedings, and served upon a present or former GSA employee.
( d ) *Appropriate authority* means the following officials who are delegated authority to approve or deny responses to demands for material, information or testimony: ( 1 ) The Counsel to the Inspector General for material and information which is the responsibility of the GSA Office of Inspector General or testimony of current or former employees of the Office of the Inspector General;
( 2 ) The Counsel to the GSA Board of Contract Appeals for material and information which is the responsibility of the Board of Contract Appeals or testimony of current or former Board of Contract Appeals employees;
( 3 ) The GSA General Counsel, Associate General Counsel(s) or Regional Counsel for all material, information, or testimony not covered by paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,879
<SECURITIES>                                    16,330
<RECEIVABLES>                                  279,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,891)
<INVENTORY>                                    314,525
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               716,645
<PP&E>                                         581,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                (64,058)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,109,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          467,395
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          133,580
<PREFERRED>                                        427
<COMMON>                                         2,021
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,109,562
<SALES>                                        515,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               515,189
<CGS>                                          418,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,935
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (836)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,176
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29


</TABLE>
#### § 102-75.1050 Is there any property for which this subpart does not apply?

Yes, this subpart does not apply to surplus property assigned for disposal to educational or public health institutions pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 550(c) or (d).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 121 (Thursday, June 22, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38860-38861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to section 1301.33(a) of title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on December 10, 1999, Salsbury 
Chemicals, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616-3466, made 
application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of amphetamine (1100) and by letter 
dated March 14, 2000, for registration to bulk manufacture 
methylphenidate (1724), basic classes of controlled substances listed 
in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to manufacture amphetamine and methylphenidate for 
distribution as bulk product.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substance may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than August 21, 2000.


[[Page 38861]]


    Dated: June 7, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcemnt Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-15690 Filed 6-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M