alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### RALPH J. LECHER, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN CURTIN, MARY ANNA CURTIN, PATRICIA CURTIN, KATHLEEN CURTIN AND JOAN CURTIN, DEPENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey Chancery Division

Decided April 30, 1951.

*378*Mr. Mario B. La Barbera,*attorney for plaintiff.

*Mr. Maurice E.*Gold, attorney for J. Albert Homan, guardian *ad litem.*

Gkimshaw, J. S. C.

This is an action to quiet the title to real property. The question raised by the pleadings is the nature and extent of the title acquired by Leopold Hoffman and Annie, his wife, under a deed from Herman H. Wundes, widower, dated May 15, 1926. In the questioned deed the granting clause is to Leopold Hoffman and Annie Hoffman, his wife, “and to his heirs and assigns forever.” The *habendum*is “unto the said party of the second part their heirs and assigns to the only proper use benefit and behoof of the said party of the second part, their heirs and assigns forever.” The covenants run to the party of the second part, “their heirs and assigns.”

It seems clear from an examination of the deed as ' a whole that the use of the singular pronoun in the granting *379clause was a scrivener’s error. I am satisfied that it was the intent of the parties that the grantees should take an estate by the entirety.

Under such circumstances the old rule of construction which placed the most emphasis on the granting clause of a deed must give way to the clear intention of the parties. *Northeastern Tel. & Tel. Co. v.*Hepburn, 73 *N. J. Eq.*657*(E. & A.*1907); *The Trenton Potteries Co. v.*Blackwell, 137 *N. J. Eq.*113*(Ch.*1945).

There will be judgment for the plaintiff.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned officer of Hines Horticulture, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.


Date: March 28, 2006      /s/ ROBERT A. FERGUSON
                          ------------------------------------------------------
                          Name: Robert A. Ferguson
                          Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
                          (Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allis-Chalmers Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Munawar H. Hidayatallah, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Company, certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Munawar H. Hidayatallah
         -----------------------
         Munawar H. Hidayatallah
         Chief Executive Officer


Date:    August 16, 2005


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF MOSS ADAMS LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Director and Shareholders
AltiGen Communications, Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-117000 and 333-121753 of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form S-8 of
our report dated December 27, 2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AltiGen Communications, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2007.

/s/
MOSS ADAMS LLP

San
Francisco, California
December 27, 2007

---



QuickLinks
#### § 337.10 Supervision of Federal projects.

District engineers should assure that dredged or fill material disposal activities are conducted in conformance with current plans and description of the project as expressed in the SOF or ROD. Conditions and/or limitations required by a state (e.g., water quality certification), as identified through the coordination process, should be included in the project specifications. Contracting officers should assure that contractors are aware of their responsibilities for compliance with the terms and conditions of state certifications and other conditions expressed in the SOF or ROD.
AO 399 (01/09) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To:

(Name of the plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint,

two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from , the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date:

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Printed name of party waiving service of summons Printed name

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.

 Southern District of Florida

EDWIN GARRISON, et al.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.

1:22-cv-23753-KMM

Adam M. Moskowitz

05/17/2023

06/01/2023

SOLOMID CORPORATION

/s/ Michael Pineiro

Michael Pineiro

Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro LLP

2 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2530

Miami, Floirda 33131

mpineiro@mnrlawfirm.com

(305) 400-4268

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 214 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 694 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 694

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey an administrative 
             site to the county of Rio Arriba, New Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

 Mr. Udall of New Mexico (for himself and Mrs. Wilson) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey an administrative 
             site to the county of Rio Arriba, New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, OLD COYOTE ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.

    (a) Conveyance of Property.--Not later than one year after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior (herein the 
``Secretary'') shall convey to the County of Rio Arriba, New Mexico 
(herein the ``County''), subject to the terms and conditions stated in 
subsection (b), all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to the land (including all improvements on the land) known as the 
``Old Coyote Administrative Site'' located approximately \1/2\ mile 
east of the Village of Coyote, New Mexico, on State Road 96, comprising 
one tract of 130.27 acres (as described in Public Land Order 3730), and 
one tract of 276.76 acres (as described in Executive Order 4599).
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--
            (1) Consideration for the conveyance described in 
        subsection (a) shall be--
                    (A) an amount that is consistent with the special 
                pricing program for Governmental entities under the Act 
                of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the Recreation and 
                Public Purposes Act; 43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.); and
                    (B) an agreement between the Secretary and the 
                County indemnifying the Government of the United States 
                from all liability of the Government that arises from 
                the property.
            (2) The lands conveyed by this section shall be used for 
        public purposes. If such lands cease to be used for public 
        purposes, at the option of the United States, such lands will 
        revert to the United States.
    (c) Land Withdrawals.--Land withdrawals under Public Land Order 
3730 and Executive Order 4599, as extended in the Federal Register on 
May 25, 1989 (54 F.R. 22629), shall be revoked simultaneous with the 
conveyance of the property under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 128481 Marilyn Kelly & (31) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices BOBBY GILLEYLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 128481 COA: 260010 Macomb CC: 2 001-000658-NO JAMES HARRINGTON and 2002-000212-CK GLORIA HARRINGTON, 2004-000182 Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Cour t, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is c onsidered, and it is DENIED, becau se the claims advanced by appellant are completely lacking in merit. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED because plaintiff is not entitled to appointed counsel.

l1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
§ 102-33.170 What standards must we establish or require (contractually, where applicable) for maintenance of our Government aircraft? For maintenance of your Government aircraft, you must establish or require (contractually, where applicable)— ( a ) Procedures to record and track duty time and training of maintenance personnel;
( b ) Aircraft maintenance and inspection programs that comply with whichever is most applicable among— ( 1 ) Programs for ex-military aircraft;
( 2 ) Manufacturers' programs;
( 3 ) FAA-approved programs (*i.e.,* following the applicable parts of 14 CFR);
( 4 ) FAA-accepted programs (*i.e.,* those following ICAP guides or similar programs that have been accepted by the FAA); or
( 5 ) Your agency's self-prescribed programs;
( c ) Compliance with owning-agency or military safety of flight notices, FAA airworthiness directives, advisory circulars and orders, or mandatory manufacturers' bulletins applicable to the types of aircraft, engines, propellers, and appliances you operate;
( d ) Procedures for operating aircraft with inoperable instruments and equipment (*i.e.,* Minimum Equipment Lists and Configuration Deviation Lists);
( e ) Technical support, including appropriate engineering documentation and testing, for aircraft, powerplant, propeller, or appliance repairs, modifications, or equipment installations;
( f ) A quality control system for acquiring replacements, ensuring that the parts you acquire are suitable replacement parts and have the documentation needed to determine that they are safe for flight and are inspected and tested, as applicable;
( g ) Procedures for recording and tracking maintenance actions; inspections; and the flight hours, cycles, and calendar times of life-limited parts and FSCAP; and
( h ) The use of alternative aviation fuels in fleet aircraft to the maximum extent possible consistent with the availability of approved alternative fuels and aircraft operating procedures or manuals for those aircraft.
#### § 101-27.403 General.

By eliminating inactive items and slow-moving items which are readily available, when needed, from Government wholesale supply activities or from commercial sources, the costs to the Government in inventory investment and for maintaining the items in inventory can be eliminated. An “inactive item” is an item for which no current or future requirements are recognized by previous users and the item manager. A “slow-moving item” is an item for which there are current or future requirements, but the frequency and quantity of such requirements do not make it economical to stock them in lieu of obtaining requirements from other sources when needed. However, “standby or reserve items” are not to be eliminated from inventories. A “standby or reserve item” is an item for which a reserve stock is held so that the items will be available immediately to meet emergencies for which there is insufficient time to procure or requisition the items without endangering life or causing substantial financial loss to the Government.

[41 FR 3859, Jan. 27, 1976]
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 534

AN ACT

To amend chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code,

to provide for greater fairness in the arbitrationprocess relating to motor vehicle franchise contracts.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 534

AN ACT

To amend chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, to provide

for greater fairness in the arbitration process relating

to motor vehicle franchise contracts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 534 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motor Vehicle Fran3 chise Contract Arbitration Fairness Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. ELECTION OF ARBITRATION.

5 (a) MOTOR VEHICLE FRANCHISE CONTRACTS.—

6 Chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, is amended by

7 adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘§ 17. Motor vehicle franchise contracts

9 ‘‘(a) For purposes of this section, the term—

10 ‘‘(1) ‘motor vehicle’ has the meaning given such

11 term under section 30102(6) of title 49; and

12 ‘‘(2) ‘motor vehicle franchise contract’ means a

13 contract under which a motor vehicle manufacturer,

14 importer, or distributor sells motor vehicles to any

15 other person for resale to an ultimate purchaser and

16 authorizes such other person to repair and service

17 the manufacturer’s motor vehicles.

18 ‘‘(b) Whenever a motor vehicle franchise contract

19 provides for the use of arbitration to resolve a controversy

20 arising out of or relating to the contract, arbitration may

21 be used to settle such controversy only if after such con22 troversy arises both parties consent in writing to use arbi23 tration to settle such controversy.

24 ‘‘(c) Whenever arbitration is elected to settle a dis25 pute under a motor vehicle franchise contract, the arbi26 trator shall provide the parties to the contract with a writ-
3

•HR 534 EH

1 ten explanation of the factual and legal basis for the

2 award.’’.

3 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

4 The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 9, United States

5 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘17. Motor vehicle franchise contracts.’’.

6 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

7 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

8 contracts entered into, amended, altered, modified, re9 newed, or extended after the date of the enactment of this

10 Act.

Passed the House of Representatives October 3,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40165

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM VIVAR-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CR-73-1

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for

William Vivar-Lopez, has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Vivar-Lopez has not filed a response. Our review of the

briefs and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.201 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides the regulations of the General Services Administration (GSA) under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d—2000d-7) concerning nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs in connection with which Federal financial assistance is extended under laws administered in whole or in part by GSA.

[38 FR 17973, July 5, 1973]
#### § 102-34.165 What information must the limited exemption certification contain?

The certification must state that identifying the motor vehicle would endanger the security of the vehicle occupants or otherwise compromise the agency mission.
Dated December 17, 2007
 STENA ROYAL S.A.R.L
 as Borrower
 and   SVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN AB (publ)
 as Facility Agent
 
 AMENDMENT NO 1 TO
FACILITY AGREEMENT MULTI CURRENCY
REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY USD 350 000 000,-




---



##### 



THIS AMENDMENT Agreement
 BETWEEN:
 1.
    
    STENA ROYAL S.A.R.L.,a private limited liability
company (socicété a
responsibilité limitée) with registered office at 26 B Bvd. Royal L-2449, incorporated
under the laws of Luxembourg and registered with the Luxembourg Register of Commerce and
Companies and whose corporate capital is EUR 100 000,- (the Borrower);2.
    
    SVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN AB (publ)and NORDEA BANK AB (publ) as lenders (together the
Original Banks);3.
    
    SVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN AB (publ)as facility agent for the Banks (in this capacity,
the Facility Agent); and4.
    
    SVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN SAas security agent for the Banks (in this capacity, the
Security Agent).
 NOW THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE
 1.
    
    DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION1.1
    
    Save as herein otherwise provided all words and expressions defined in the
Agreement shall have the same meaning in this Amendment No 1.2.
    
    AMENDMENT TO THE FACILITY AGREEMENT2.1
    
    For the avoidance of doubt the Banks hereby agrees and acknowledges that they
have no recourse of any nature whatsoever pursuant to the Agreement against any
assets of Stena AB (publ) or any subsidiary or affiliate of Stena AB (publ) (other
than the Borrower and certain of the subsidiaries of the Borrower which are
unrestricted for the purpose of Stena ABs Indenture).3.
    
    NO OTHER AMENDMENTS3.1
    
    Except as specifically amended herein, the terms and conditions of the
Agreement remain in full force and effect.




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 STENA ROYAL S.a.r.l 
as
Borrower/s/ S. R. Clarkson

Name: S. R. ClarksonSVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN AB (publ)
as Facility Agent and Bank/s/ Mots Eriksson

Name: Mots ErikssonSVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN SA 
as Security Agent/s/ Svenska Handelsbanken

Name:NORDEA BANK AB (publ)
as Bank/s/ Bengt Zacharoff

Name: Bengt Zacharoff
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF ALLAN G. HUTCHISON, CPA**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-100453) of our report dated February 27, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Quotemedia, Inc. as at December 31, 2003 (notpresented herein) and the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Allan G. Hutchison, CPA 

 

Phoenix, Arizona 

March 29, 2005
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Triple P N.V. (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned Huub Crijns, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)                      the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                      the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

 
| May 26, 2004                     |
|----------------------------------|
|                             |
| /s/ Huub  Crijns                 |   |
| Huub  Crijns                     |
| Interim  Chief Executive Officer |
| (principal  executive officer)   |

 

----