alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is _____________________________________.

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the 

FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC,

d/b/a Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively 

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River 

and the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is 

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein 

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by 

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Dated ______________, 2023. Signed:_________________________

Printed Name:____________________

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: _________________________________ Tel No.:___________________________

_________________________________ Email: ____________________________

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156 / brian@fairlawattorney.com

TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1 Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 178-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
Order entered March 4, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01206-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF ROBERTO REFUGIO DE JESUS 

GONZALEZ BARRERA

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-15-02268-1

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 2, 2020 unopposed third motion for an 

extension of time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and 

extend the time to March 23, 2020. We caution appellant that further extension 

requests will be strongly disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### § 102-33.225 How must we manage aircraft parts?

You must manage your aircraft parts by maintaining proper storage, protection, maintenance procedures, and records for the parts throughout their life cycles.
National Rates of Civic Engagement 

in 2019 and 2021

The Current Population Survey Civic Engagement and Volunteering (CEV) Supplement is the most robust 

longitudinal survey about volunteerism and other forms of civic engagement in the United States. Produced 

through a partnership between AmeriCorps and the U.S. Census Bureau, the CEV takes the pulse of our nation’s 

civic health every two years. The CEV collects data on formal volunteering, informal helping, and other types of 

civic behaviors—such as donating to charity, participating in organizations, and voting in local elections—along 

with how individuals perceive the relationship between their work and civic activities. 

See how the U.S. population engaged in civic life in 2019 and 2021. 

Explore the Data: The CEV data is available for public use. Visit the AmeriCorps Open Data portal at https://data.americorps.gov. 

For more information about the CEV data and findings, please reach out to the AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation 

at AmeriCorpsCEV@americorps.gov. 

About the Office of Research and Evaluation: The AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation assists AmeriCorps and its 

partners in collecting, analyzing, and disseminating data and insights about AmeriCorps programs and civic life in America.

About AmeriCorps: AmeriCorps, the federal agency for national service and volunteerism, provides opportunities 

for Americans to serve their country domestically, address the nation’s most pressing challenges, improve lives and 

communities, and strengthen civic engagement. Each year, the agency places more than 200,000 AmeriCorps members 

and AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers in intensive service roles; and empowers millions more to serve as long-term, short-term, 

or one-time volunteers. Learn more at AmeriCorps.gov.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Odessa Regional Hospital, LP
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                 /s/ Timothy Adams
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Timothy Adams
                              Vice President and Chief Executive Officer -
                              Odessa Regional Hospital, LP of
                              IASIS Healthcare Holdings, Inc.,
                              General Partner of Odessa Regional Hospital, LP
                              December 24, 2003


                                 /s/ Stacey Gerig
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Stacey Gerig
                              Vice President and Chief Financial Officer -
                              Odessa Regional Hospital, LP of
                              IASIS Healthcare Holdings, Inc.,
                              General Partner of Odessa Regional Hospital, LP
                              December 24, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Odessa Regional Hospital, LP and will be retained by Odessa Regional
Hospital, LP and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 102-118.440 Does my agency pay for a transportation postpayment audit conducted by the GSA Transportation Audits Division?

The GSA Transportation Audits Division does not charge agencies a fee for conducting the transportation postpayment audit. Transportation postpayment audits expenses are financed from overpayments collected from the TSP's bills previously paid by the agency and similar type of refunds. However, if a postpayment audit is conducted in lieu of a prepayment audit at the request of an agency, or if there are additional services required, GSA may charge the agency.
#### NELSON H. SALISBURY, Respondent, *v.*JOHN F. STINSON, Appellant.

*Complaint for goods sold,*— Won-payment *of claim*— need *not be aMeged*— dem/m'rm\

A complaint alleging that the plaintiff “sold and delivered to the defendant certain goods of the value, and forwhichthe defendant agreed to pay $164 68,” is sufficient, and it is not necessary to allege that the demand has not heen paid, or that it remains due and unpaid at the time of commencing the action.

Appeal from an order made at Special Term, overruling as frivolous a demurrer interposed to the complaint.

*Albert*Roberts, for the appellant.

*Jerolomam, & Arrowsrmth*for the respondent.

Davis, P. J.:

The count of the complaint demurred to in this case alleges “ that heretofore, and on and between May 12, and May 20, 18Y3, one Edward MacDavis sold and delivered to the above-named defendant certain goods of the value, and for which the defendant agreed to *243pay tbe sum of $164.68.” It then alleges an assignment of the account to the plaintiff, and judgment is demanded for the above sum, with interest.

The defendant demurred, on the ground *“*that the complaint, as to the first alleged cause of action, does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.”

The point urged under this demurrer is,' that the count does not allege that the demand has not been paid, or that it remains due and unpaid. The count, however, contains every fact necessary to be proved on the trial, to wit: a sale and delivery of the goods to the defendant, an agreement to pay a stipulated price therefor, and an assignment to plaintiff. Proof of these facts would entitle plaintiff to a verdict without giving affirmative evidence that the price agreed upon had not .been paid. Under the Code this is sufficient. *“A*plain, concise statement of facts, constituting a cause of action without unnecessary repetition,” is all that is required. (Code, § 142.) This means only the facts necessary to be proved by plaintiff, and upon proof of which he is entitled to judgment. Under the former practice, the complaint would probably have been bad on special demurrer for not alleging a breach, but under the present system, when the breach is presumed on proof of the facts alleged, it is only necessary to aver the facts, although the averment of non-payment, or that the sum remains due and unpaid, in such a case as this, is the usual and more complete form of pleading. Upon the facts stated, the debt is due presently, and no demand is necessary; and there is no necessity to allege that it has become payable by lapse of time. Payment is an affirmative defense, and should be alleged and proved by the defendant.

The order should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

■ Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION
NEWS RELEASE
ANNOUNCES SECOND QUARTER RESULTS


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


            ACME ELECTRIC ANNOUNCES SECOND-QUARTER RESULTS


     EAST AURORA, N.Y., February 4, 1997 -- Acme Electric Corporation
(NYSE:ACE) announced today that, for the second quarter of its 1997
fiscal year ended December 27, 1996, net sales were $23,478,000,
compared to $23,425,000 for the comparable period of the previous year,
with net income of $84,000, or $.02 per share, compared to a net loss
of $834,000, or $.17 per share the previous year.  Net sales for the
twenty-six-week period ended December 27, 1996, were $46,701,000,
compared with $49,356,000 for the comparable period of the previous
year.  Net income for the twenty-six-week period ended December 27,
1996, was $90,000, or $.02 per share, compared with a net loss of
$501,000, or $.10 per share, for the comparable period of the previous
year.
     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Robert J. McKenna, said
that, "Our results should improve through our continued investment in
converting operations to Demand Flow Technology and installing an
Oracle-Registered Trademark--based business system.  The improvement in
quality, service and flexibility makes these investments worthwhile for
the long-term future of the Company."  Mr. McKenna also reported that
contingencies for the sale of the Aerospace Division were not met.  The
business will remain an integral part of the Company, as it continues
its strategy to achieve profitable operation.
     McKenna added that, "The financial results for the quarter show
improvement compared to the previous year, and our long-term prospects
are improving as well."
     Founded in 1917, Acme Electric Corporation is a leader in the
design and manufacture of power conversion products for electronic and
electrical systems for industrial, commercial, residential, and
military and aerospace applications.  corporate headquarters are in
East Aurora, N.Y., with operations in Cuba, N.Y., Lumberton, N.C. and
Tempe, Ariz.  Company news is available by FAX: dial 1-800-758-5804,
and input extension 006675; or for INTERNET access go to: 
http://www.prnewswire.com/cnoc/exec/menu?006675

                                # # # #
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION

Comparative Analysis
(in thousands, except for per share data)




                      13 Weeks      13 Weeks      26 Weeks      26 Weeks
                       Ended         Ended         Ended         Ended
                  Dec. 27, 1996 Dec. 29, 1995 Dec. 27, 1996 Dec. 29, 1995
                  ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S>                 <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Net Sales             $23,478       $23,425       $46,701       $49,356
Net Income (Loss)          84          (834)           90          (501)
Net Income (Loss) 
  Per Common Share       $.02         $(.17)         $.02         $(.10)
Weighted Number of 
Shares Outstanding
Used to Compute Net
Income (Loss) Per 
Common Share        4,965,378     4,949,791     4,961,463     4,955,494

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this annual report of ML Select FuturesI L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),I, Michael L. Pungello, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantof the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 31, 2006                                            |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                            |
| By                                                              | /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO |   |
| Michael L. Pungello                                             |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer                         |
| **and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer)** |

 

 

----
FY 2020 Q4 FOIA Quarterly Report

Agency

Corporation for National and Community Service

Reporting Quarter

2020 Q4

10 Oldest Requests

Did your agency have 10 or more perfected requests pending at the end of the last fiscal year? If so, 

please select the number 10. If your agency had fewer than 10, please select the correct number.

8

Of the ten or fewer requests identified in your previous response, please select the number of requests 

your agency has closed during the current fiscal year.

8

FOIA Requests Information

Component Requests Received in Requests Processed Requests Backlogged as of

Reporting Quarter in Reporting Quarter End of Reporting Quarter 

CNCS 11 10 1
Before the 

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

 WASHINGTON, DC 

INTRA ALASKA BUSH MAIL RATES Docket OST-2003-14694 

REPLY OF THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ON SHOW CAUSE ORDER 

2011-6-14 AND SUBSEQUENT COMMENTS BY THE CONSOLIDATED CARRIERS 

 

Communications with respect to this 

document should be addressed to: 

 Joseph Anzalone, Esq. 

 Office of General Counsel 

 United States Postal Service 

 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW 

 Washington, DC 20260-1127 

 joseph.anzalone@usps.gov 

Date Filed: September 8, 2011 

1
2

The Postal Service presents brief comments in response to Show Cause Order 2011-6-14 (“the 

Order”) and in response to objections and comments filed in reference to the Order. 

As to the substance of the rates proposed in the Order, the Postal Service has no objection. 

The Postal Service requests that the Department make the mail rates from the Order effective 

for a period of 12 months from when the Department finalizes the rates. 

The Postal Service reiterates that it supports the reporting by air carrier(s) to the Department 

of mail class costs that are segmented by actual equipment used to perform service. The 

Postal Service does not support the position of excluding specific equipment from the rate 

class that it legally operates within. All equipment operating under Part 121 or Part 135 bush 

operations should be included in the appropriate rate class established in the Department’s 

ratemaking methodology. With this in mind, the Postal Service agrees with the Department’s 

interpretation of 39 U.S.C. § 5402(h)(2)(B) as restated on page 6 of the Order. 

The Postal Service also supports the Department’s proposed adoption of a Taper as proposed 

in the Order. The Postal Service believes it is the right time to reintroduce the Taper in the 

Bush 135 rate, and agrees that a Taper provides a closer fit to actual costs. However, the 

Postal Service highly objects to the proposals contained in the July 19, 2011 Answer of the 

Consolidated Carriers. 

The Postal Service also objects to the August 26, 2011 Motion of the Consolidated Carriers 

proposing the exclusion from the Part 135 bush mail rate of PenAir’s Saab and Metroliner 

costs and data. The Postal Service has vehemently objected in the past to similar proposals by 

the Consolidated Carriers, and such similar proposals have been uniformly rejected by the 

Department for good reason. There is no reasonable basis to reverse course and entertain the 

Consolidated Carriers’ proposal.
§ 101-1.109 Numbering in FPMR System. ( a ) In the numbering system, all FPMR material is preceded by the digits 101-. This means that it is chapter 101 in title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations. It has no other significance. The digit(s) before the decimal point indicates the part; the digits after the decimal point indicate, without separation, the subpart and section. For example:
( b ) At the bottom of each page appears the number and date (month and year) of the FPMR amendment which transmitted it.
( c ) Agency implementing regulations should conform to the FPMR section numbers, except for the substitution of the chapter designation of the agency. Agency supplementing regulations should be numbered “50” or higher for section, subpart, or part as may be involved.
[54 FR 37652, Sept. 12, 1989]
AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION 10-Q



EXHIBIT 31(b)



SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATIONS - CONTINUED

|I, Fred J. Runk, certify that:
|------------------------------
|                              
|1.                            
|                              
|2.                            
|                              
|3.                            
|                              
|4.                            
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|5.                            
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|                              
|August 11, 2003               
|                              
|                              
|                              



E-3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP00-380-000]

Take notice that on June 7, 2000, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia), 12801 Fair Lakes Parkway, Fairfax, Virginia 22030-0146, filed in Docket No. CP00-380-000, a request pursuant to sections 157.205 and 157.208 (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.208) of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act, and Columbia's authorization in Docket No. CP83-76-000, 22 FERC Paragraph 62,029 (1983) to increase the maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) of its existing delivery lateral pipeline designated as K-212 located in Ohio. Columbia states the uprate is necessary in order to provide volumes of natural gas and the pressure requested by Southeastern Natural Gas Company, who will use the gas to serve Shelly Asphalt Plant located in Licking County, Ohio. The application may be viewed on the web at www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm. Call (202) 208-2222 for assistance.

Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days after the issuance of the instant notice by Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and, pursuant to section 157.205 of the regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-15569  Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M