alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State

Total 

Funding 

Available

Start Date

Volunteer 

Service 

Years(VSY)

Areas Affected Updates

California $78,000 1-Apr-20 13 Riverside County, California

California $385,999 1-Apr-20 64 Los Angeles County: The Central Los Angeles, Eastside, 

South Bay, South Los Angeles, and Southeast regions

Idaho $214,847 1-Apr-20 36 Blaine, Camas, Cassia, Gooding, Jerome, Lincoln, 

Minidoka, and Twin Falls Counties 

Indiana $214,155 1-Apr-20 36 Lake, Porter and LaPorte counties

Iowa $170,353 1-Apr-20 28 Pottawattamie, Fremont and Mills counties

Iowa $300,000 1-Apr-20 50 Dallas and Polk Counties

Iowa $228,000 1-Apr-20 38 Boone, Marshall and Story Counties

Iowa $240,000 1-Apr-20 40 Dubuque, Delaware, Johnson, Linn and Jackson Counties

Kentucky $90,000 1-Apr-20 15 Caldwell, Christian and Hopkins Counties 

Michigan $658,721 1-Apr-20 110 Wayne County and the city of St. Clair Shores in 

Macomb County

Minnesota $470,091 1-Apr-20 78 St. Louis, Pine, Carlton, Lake & Cook Counties 

Montana $213,951 1-Apr-20 36 Flathead, Lake, Lincoln, Mineral, Ravalli, Sanders and 

the Flathead Indian Reservation updated 10/02/2019

Nebraska $150,000 1-Apr-20 25 Box Butte, Cherry, Dawes, Sheridan and Sioux

New York $150, 238 1-Apr-20 22 Livingston, Steuben, & Wyoming Counties

North Dakota $285,523 1-Apr-20 48

Barnes, Benson, Cass, Cavalier, Grand Forks, Griggs, 

Pierce, Ramsey, Richland, Sargent, Stutsman, Traill, 

Walsh Counties

Oklahoma $150,000 1-Apr-20 25 Seminole County

Oklahoma $270, 013 1-Apr-20 45 Oklahoma, Canadian, Logan, Kingfisher, and Garfield 

counties

South 

Carolina $125,656 1-Apr-20 21 Williamsburg County

South 

Carolina $235,870 1-Apr-20 39 Charleston, Berkeley and Dorchester Counties

South Dakota $120,000 1-Apr-20 20 Todd County which encompass the Rosebud Indian 

Reservation

South Dakota $180,000 1-Apr-20 30

Butte, Custer, Fall River, Haakon, Harding, Jones, 

Lawrence, Meade, Mellette, Pennington, and Perkins 

Counties and all but the NW portion of Bennett County 

and the Southern half of Jackson which encompass the 

Pine Ridge Reservation

South Dakota $365,990 1-Apr-20 61

Dewey, Ziebach, Corson, Brown,Edmunds, Hand, 

Marshall, McPherson, Spink, Walworth( Including 

reservations: River Sioux Tribe and Standing Rock Sioux 

Tribe), Beadle, Brookings, Codington, Day, Hughes, 

Minnehahah, ( Including reservations: Flandreau Santee 

Sioux Tribe and Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake 

Traverse Reservation)

Utah $179,544 1-Apr-20 30 Carbon, Emery, Grande, San Juan or Tooele Counties

Wisconsin $78,349 1-Apr-20 13 Douglas County

Wyoming $296,470 1-Apr-20 49

State of Wyoming Counties of Laramie, Goshen, and 

Platte Cities/Towns of Cheyenne, Torrington, 

Wheatland.

2020 FGP Competition Appendix A- List of Available Funding Opportunities
§ 102-33.125 If we use Federal aircraft, what are our management responsibilities? If you use Federal aircraft, you are responsible for— ( a ) Establishing agency-specific Flight Program Standards, as defined in §§ 102-33.140 through 102-33.185;
( b ) Accounting for the cost of acquiring, operating, and supporting your aircraft;
( c ) Accounting for the use of your aircraft;
( d ) Maintaining and accounting for aircraft parts;
( e ) Reporting inventory, cost, and utilization data (for reporting requirements, see subpart E of this part); and
( f ) Properly disposing of aircraft and parts following §§ 102-33.240 through 102-33.375.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[NAFTA-03942]


Glacier Gold Compost, Incorporated Olney, MT; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Public Law 103-182) concerning transitional 
adjustment assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in 
accordance with section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of 
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation 
was initiated on May 19, 2000 in response to a petition filed by a 
company official on behalf of workers at Glacier Gold Compost, 
Incorporated, Olney, Montana.
    In a letter dated June 5, 2000, the petitioner requested that the 
petition for NAFTA-TAA be withdrawn. Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of June, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-15142 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,293-02

EX PARTE ELROY TOMPKINS, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 15-09-15387A IN THE 506TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM WALLER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon and was sentenced

to five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this application for

a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends that he is being denied due process because is being held pursuant to a

parole revocation warrant, which is preventing him from bonding out on a new charge, but no parole

revocation proceedings have been initiated. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle

him to relief. TEX. GOV'T CODE, § 508.2811; Ex parte Cordova, 235 S.W.3d 735, 736 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2007). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum
2

for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person

with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set

out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If

counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name.

The response shall state whether Applicant is being held pursuant to a parole revocation

warrant, and if so, the date upon which that warrant was executed. The response shall state whether

Applicant has been advised of his rights in the revocation process, whether he has requested or

waived a preliminary hearing and whether he has been afforded a preliminary hearing. If Applicant

is also being held on new charges, the response shall state whether Applicant has been indicted on

those charges, and if so, when the indictment was returned.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

is receiving due process in the parole revocation proceedings. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
3

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 16, 2020

Do not publish
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5271

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the rules applicable to

net worth limitation with respect to eligibility for pensions for certain

veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2000

Mr. EVANS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the rules

applicable to net worth limitation with respect to eligibility for pensions for certain veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Family

5 Farm Preservation Act’’.
2

•HR 5271 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF RULES WITH RESPECT TO NET WORTH

2 LIMITATION FOR ELIGIBILITY FOR PENSIONS

3 FOR VETERANS WHO ARE PERMANENTLY

4 AND TOTALLY DISABLED FROM A NON-SERV5 ICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1522(a) of title 38,

7 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

8 following: ‘‘In determining the corpus of the estates of the

9 veteran and the veteran’s spouse, if any, the value of the

10 real property of the veteran and the veteran’s spouse and

11 children shall be excluded if such property is used for

12 farming, ranching, or similar agricultural purposes.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 subsection (a) applies to payment of pensions for months

15 beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this

16 Act.

Æ
**
**EXHIBIT 33.2**

**Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**

 
1.
Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100 – Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R.§§229.1100-229.1123 (“Regulation AB”), Exela Technologies, Inc., for itself and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively “Exela”), is responsible for assessingits compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to customers who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and who have requested confirmation of Exela’s compliancein connection with loan and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the “Platform”). Remittance processing is a service whereby check payments that are remitted by mail to a post officebox are collected, processed through a highly automated data capture system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary of the payment. 

 
2.
The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used in Exela’s assessment ofcompliance. Exela has concluded that the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the Platform (such criteria the “ApplicableServicing Criteria”). Exela has concluded that the remainder of the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform because Exela does not participate inthe servicing activities referenced by such servicing criteria. 

 
3.
As of and for the period ending December 31, 2021, Exela has complied in all material respects with theApplicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB. 

 
4.
Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestationreport on Exela’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the period ending December 31, 2021. 

 
/s/ Thomas K. DolanThomas K. DolanSVP Information Security and RiskJanuary 25, 2022**
**
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. 

American Express Credit Account Master Trust 

Reporting Period January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“TRS”), as Servicer pursuant to theFourth Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2018 (as so amended and restated and as otherwise amended from time to time, the “Agreement”), among American Express Receivables Financing CorporationIII LLC as transferor, TRS, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee and securities intermediary (the “Trustee”), as acknowledged and accepted by American Express ReceivablesFinancing Corporation II, as a transferor prior to July 20, 2016, does hereby certify that: 

 
1.
TRS is Servicer under the Agreement. 

 
2.
The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver thisCertificate. 

 
3.
A review of the Servicer’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under my supervision. 

 
4.
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theAgreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed thisCertificate this 25th day of March, 2019. 

 

AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED

SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
By: 
/s/ J J Anand
Name: J J AnandTitle: Vice President**
§ 102-41.85 What choices do I have for retaining or disposing of voluntarily abandoned personal property? You may either retain or dispose of voluntarily abandoned personal property based on the following circumstances: ( a ) If your agency has a need for the property, you may retain it for official use, except for large sedans and limousines which may only be retained for official use as authorized under part 102-34 of this subchapter B. See § 102-41.90 for how retained property must be handled.
( b ) If your agency doesn't need the property, you should determine whether it may be abandoned or destroyed in accordance with the provisions at FMR 102-36.305 through 102-36.330. Furthermore, in addition to the circumstances when property may be abandoned or destroyed without public notice at FMR 102-36.330, voluntarily abandoned property may also be abandoned or destroyed without public notice when the estimated resale value of the property is less than $500.
( c ) If the property is not retained for official use or abandoned or destroyed, you must report it to GSA as excess in accordance with § 102-41.95.
Social Innovation Fund Classic 2016 Grantee Perspective

SIF CLASSIC GRANTEE PERSPECTIVE

March 28, 2016 – Overview Webinar #1 

Lili Allen, Associate Vice President of Reconnection Strategies and Designs – Jobs for the Future 

Project Management is Critical

You will need to get your project manager on board quickly and make sure you have a fiscal team that 

really understands federal grants – for example, the difference between subawards vs. contracts. The 

level of detail that this person needs to understand is beyond what you would see in typical grant-making. 

For example – if you are subcontracting with a vendor, when do they need to do background checks? 

What is a SIF-eligible beneficiary? How do federal funds and match funds have to be tracked? 

Technical Assistance Planning

Think about the technical assistance your subgrantees will need to do quality implementation. Some SIF 

grantees simply subgrant and then monitor their subgrantees. We built in extensive coaching to support 

the sites. Depending on what you are doing and the state of the field in your area, you may want to think 

about how you would structure this. 

Manage Deadlines

The first year is intensive in terms of deadlines. Almost immediately, you will need to submit a site 

selection plan. You’ll need to select your sites and get the subgrant awards in place, and your sites will 

need to understand how to operate under federal requirements. You’ll need to develop an evaluation plan. 

You’ll need to develop a scaling plan. Be ready to launch and sprint as soon as you are notified of the 

award. 

The Benefits of SIF 

In terms of benefits, the SIF is enabling us to implement and evaluate our Back on Track interventions in 

a way that would not be possible otherwise. We will have an impact on the field that we think is really 

critical in terms of improving outcomes for our target population – opportunity youth and in particular 

young men of color. The ability to build an evidence base through a rigorous third-party evaluation is 

really important to us. It has also brought in funders that we had not been able to tap or collaborate with 

before. SIF staff are terrific. They are somewhat different from other federal agencies in the level of 

problem-solving and collaboration they bring to the work.
1 From: Tom Lund [tlund@isolatek.com]

Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 9:00 AM

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Reeves, David; Susan Fairchild

Subject: Re: Contact Information for EPA

Categories: Blue Category

I am the contact person for Isolatek International. It will be my responsibility to route any

correspondence or communication within our organization.

US Mail can be addressed to my attention:

Isolatek International

P.O. Box 5006

Huntington, IN 46750

Parcel deliveries can be sent to my attention:

Isolatek International

701 N Broadway St reet

Huntington, IN 46750

Tom Lund

Operations Manager

260

‐ 356

‐ 2040 x328

260

‐ 356

‐ 2337 fax

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

The documents accompanying this telecopy transmission co n tain information which may be confidential

and/or legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or

entity named on this transmission sheet. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby

notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the

contents of this telecopied information is strictly prohibited, and that the documents should be

returned to the Company immediately. In this regard, if you have received this telecopy in error,

please notify us.

"Hancy, Cindy

Wang"

< chancy@rti.org > To

< tlund@isolatek.com >

07/14/2011 02:53 cc

PM "Susan Fairchild"

< Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov >,

"Reeves, David" < dwreeves@rti.org >

Subject

Contact Information for EPA2 Tom,

As I mentioned in my voicemail, could you provide a corporate contact to send the 114 Request? You

are the only contact listed in the ICR.

Thanks,

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

‐ 6623

Fax: (919) 316

‐ 3420
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 638

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the Lifetime

Learning Credit for tuition expenses for continuing education for secondary teachers in their fields of teaching.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 9, 1999

Mr. GALLEGLY (for himself, Mr. HORN, Mr. POMEROY, and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the Lifetime Learning Credit for tuition expenses for

continuing education for secondary teachers in their

fields of teaching.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teacher Investment

5 and Enhancement Act’’.
2

•HR 638 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED LIFETIME LEARNING CREDIT FOR AD2 DITIONAL TRAINING FOR SECONDARY

3 TEACHERS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 25A of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to lifetime

6 learning credit) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULE FOR FIELD OF STUDY

9 TRAINING FOR CERTAIN TEACHERS.—

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—If any portion of the

11 qualified tuition and related expenses to which

12 this subsection applies—

13 ‘‘(i) is paid or incurred by an individ14 ual who is a full-time teacher in the class15 room in a secondary school and is certified

16 or licensed to teach by the State in which

17 the individual is teaching, and

18 ‘‘(ii) is incurred for the enrollment or

19 attendance of such individual in a course

20 of instruction directly relevant to the sub21 ject matter currently taught by such indi22 vidual that is offered for credit by an eligi23 ble educational institution,

24 paragraph (1) shall be applied with respect to

25 such portion by substituting ‘40 percent’ for ‘20

26 percent’.
3

•HR 638 IH

1 ‘‘(B) ELIGIBLE EDUCATIONAL INSTITU2 TION.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the

3 term ‘eligible educational institution’ has the

4 meaning given to such term by subsection

5 (f)(2), except that such term includes a public

6 institution that provides a 2-year educational

7 program which is acceptable for full credit to8 ward a bachelor’s degree.’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 subsection (a) shall apply to expenses paid after December

11 31, 1998, for education furnished in academic periods be12 ginning after such date.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Zachary Lipshultz of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Naomi Osaka, and requests that all papers served in this 

case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Dated: April 14, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Zachary Lipshultz

Zachary Lipshultz

Florida Bar No. 123594

Email: zach@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Naomi Osaka

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 137 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
# Diversity Questionaire

&G	

# image1.png
149IO-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRA,,'1SPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

rDocket No. FAA-2010-9:l~7~ectorateIdentifier 201O-NM-036-AD;

WLq'lJ IO-lq

Amendment 39_*v;.***;AD 2010-**-**)

RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A340-200 and A340-300 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list d ~

m

*

*

*

* *

*

*

*

*

*

•

*

*

*

which could result in failure of the fOIV.'ardengine mount, possible separation of the

load path for the forward engine mounl and damage to other engine mount structures,

above that supersedes an existing AD. This AD results from mandatory continuing

Engineering analysis using the new calculated loads has shown that the

structural integrity of the forward engine mount cannot be guaranteed after

either thrust link has accumulated 15500 Flight Cycles (Fe).

the unsafe condition as:

to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describe

airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another count

A loss of stmctural integrity of the forward engine mounts could lead to the Joss of the
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/07/2001 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/07/2001 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/07/2001 Page 3 of 3