alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2.3 Offices.

The principal office of the Postal Service is located in Washington, DC, with such regional and other offices and places of business as the Postmaster General establishes from time to time, or the business of the Postal Service requires.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5111

AN ACT

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation

Administration to treat certain property boundaries as the boundaries of the Lawrence CountyAirport, Courtland, Alabama, and for other purposes.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5111

AN ACT

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to treat certain property boundaries as the

boundaries of the Lawrence County Airport, Courtland,

Alabama, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5111 EH

1 SECTION 1. LAWRENCE COUNTY AIRPORT, COURTLAND,

2 ALABAMA.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—With respect to the airport lo4 cated at Courtland, Lawrence County, Alabama (formerly

5 known as the George C. Wallace Airport), the Adminis6 trator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall treat

7 as the boundaries of the airport property those boundaries

8 shown on the airport layout drawing produced by Garver,

9 Inc., dated March 8, 1999, and approved by the Jackson

10 Airport District Office of the Administration.

11 (b) TREATMENT OF NONAIRPORT PROPERTY.—The

12 Administrator may not treat as airport property any real

13 property not designated as airport property in the drawing

14 referred to in subsection (a) regardless of whether such

15 real property was designated as airport property at any

16 time prior to March 8, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATEPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFSARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, JosephJ. Talley Chief Financial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

1.          TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February28, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.          Information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation ofthe Company.

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 16th day of April,2007.
|        | By:                             | /s/ Joseph J. Talley |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Joseph J.  Talley         |
|   | Title: Chief  Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with this Yearly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Teresa B. Dickey, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Teresa B. Dickey

Teresa B. Dickey

Principal Financial Officer

 

March 24, 2006
Exhibit 12
                        AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
           Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (in millions)

                                         Three Months ended   Nine Months Ended
                                           September 30,         September 30,
                                          2006      2005        2006       2005

Earnings (loss):
 Earnings (loss) before income taxes       $  1      $(161)     $  175    $(291)

  Add:  Total fixed charges (per below)     432        399       1,276    1,150

  Less:  Interest capitalized                 7         12          21       58

   Total earnings (loss) before income
    taxes                                  $426     $  226      $1,430   $  801

Fixed charges:
 Interest, including interest
  capitalized                              $217     $  180      $  635   $  521

 Portion of rental expense
  representative of the interest
  factor                                    212        216         630      621

  Amortization of debt expense                3          3          11        8
   Total fixed charges                     $432      $ 399      $1,276   $1,150

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            -          -        1.12        -

Coverage deficiency                        $  6      $ 173      $    -   $  349


Note:     As   of   September  30,  2006,  American   has   guaranteed
   approximately   $1.1   billion  of   AMR's   unsecured   debt   and
   approximately  $388  million  of AMR  Eagle's  secured  debt.   The
   impact  of  these unconditional guarantees is not included  in  the
   above computation.
§ 101-4.525 Fringe benefits. ( a ) *“Fringe benefits” defined.* For purposes of these Title IX regulations, *fringe benefits* means: Any medical, hospital, accident, life insurance, or retirement benefit, service, policy or plan, any profit-sharing or bonus plan, leave, and any other benefit or service of employment not subject to the provision of § 101-4.515.
( b ) *Prohibitions.* A recipient shall not: ( 1 ) Discriminate on the basis of sex with regard to making fringe benefits available to employees or make fringe benefits available to spouses, families, or dependents of employees differently upon the basis of the employee's sex;
( 2 ) Administer, operate, offer, or participate in a fringe benefit plan that does not provide for equal periodic benefits for members of each sex and for equal contributions to the plan by such recipient for members of each sex; or
( 3 ) Administer, operate, offer, or participate in a pension or retirement plan that establishes different optional or compulsory retirement ages based on sex or that otherwise discriminates in benefits on the basis of sex.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL B. FEIN,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2709 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 147 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 12250

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29 th day of June , 2020, upon consideration of the Report and

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Michael B. Fein is suspended from the Bar

of this Commonwealth for a period of six months, and he shall comply wi th all the

provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board

. See

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
§ 620.3 Occupations that regularly conduct drug testing for purposes of determining which applicants may be drug tested when applying for State unemployment compensation. In electing to test applicants for unemployment compensation under this part, States may enact legislation to require drug testing for applicants for whom the only suitable work is in one or more of the following occupations that regularly conduct drug testing, for purposes of § 620.4: ( a ) An occupation that requires the employee to carry a firearm;
( b ) An occupation identified in 14 CFR 120.105 by the Federal Aviation Administration, in which the employee must be tested;
( c ) An occupation identified in 49 CFR 382.103 by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, in which the employee must be tested;
( d ) An occupation identified in 49 CFR 219.3 by the Federal Railroad Administration, in which the employee must be tested;
( e ) An occupation identified in 49 CFR 655.3 by the Federal Transit Administration, in which the employee must be tested;
( f ) An occupation identified in 49 CFR 199.2 by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, in which the employee must be tested;
( g ) An occupation identified in 46 CFR 16.201 by the United States Coast Guard, in which the employee must be tested;
( h ) An occupation specifically identified in Federal law as requiring an employee to be tested for controlled substances;
( i ) An occupation specifically identified in the State law of that State as requiring an employee to be tested for controlled substances; and
( j ) An occupation where the State has a factual basis for finding that employers hiring employees in that occupation conduct pre- or post-hire drug testing as a standard eligibility requirement for obtaining or maintaining employment in the occupation.
# United States Court **of Appeals** 

**f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 30550

**Immaculata N Anyanwu,**

Plaintiff

— Appellant

**,**

versus

**State of Louisiana, Through its Department of Health and Hospitals Office of Behavioral Health,** 

Defendant

— Appellee

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:18

- CV

- 778

Before **Haynes, Graves,** and **Willett,** Circuit Judges

**.**
**Per Curiam :**  *

The court has reviewed the briefs, district court opinion, and
pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no reversible error
of fact or law. The judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
April 30, 2021

Lyle W. Cayc e Clerk Case: 20-30550 Document: 00515844130 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2021
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 603 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 603

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the application of 
   the Act popularly known as the ``Death on the High Seas Act'' to 
                          aviation incidents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

 Mr. Sherwood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the application of 
   the Act popularly known as the ``Death on the High Seas Act'' to 
                          aviation incidents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION AMENDMENT.

    Section 40120(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``(including the Act entitled `An Act relating to the 
maintenance of actions for death on the high seas and other navigable 
waters', approved March 30, 1920, commonly known as the Death on the 
High Seas Act (46 U.S.C. App. 761-767; 41 Stat. 537-538))'' after 
``United States''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies to civil actions commenced 
after the date of the enactment of this Act and to civil actions that 
are not adjudicated by a court of original jurisdiction or settled on 
or before such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 580

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply the capital gains

tax rates to capital gains earned by designated settlement funds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply

the capital gains tax rates to capital gains earned by

designated settlement funds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CAPITAL GAINS TAX RATES APPLIED TO CAP4 ITAL GAINS OF DESIGNATED SETTLEMENT

5 FUNDS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 468B(b)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to taxation

8 of designated settlement funds) is amended by inserting

9 ‘‘(subject to section 1(h))’’ after ‘‘maximum rate’’.
2

•HR 580 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

3 December 31, 1999.

Æ
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 593

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit nonparty

multicandidate political committee contributions in elections for Federal office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. GILCHREST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

prohibit nonparty multicandidate political committee contributions in elections for Federal office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS BY

4 NONPARTY MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL

5 COMMITTEES IN ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL

6 OFFICE.

7 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

8 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

9 the following new subsection:
2

HR 593 IH

1 ‘‘(i)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

2 Act, no nonparty multicandidate political committee may

3 make any contribution to a candidate for Federal office.

4 ‘‘(2) As used in this subsection, the term ‘multi5 candidate political committee’ has the meaning given that

6 term in subsection (a)(4).’’.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0171 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHINA ROSE DAWN DAVIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 13 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 3 2023

08/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0171
§ 101-37.000 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR chapter 102, part 102-33 and the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) (41 CFR chapters 300-304, parts 300-3, 301-10, and 301-70)). ( a ) For information on Government aviation administration and coordination, previously contained in subparts 101-37.1, 101-37.2, 101-37.3, and 101-37.5 through 101-37.14, see FMR part 102-33, Management of Government Aircraft (41 CFR part 102-33).
( b ) For information on travel on Government aircraft previously contained in subparts 101-37.1 and 101-37.4, see 41 CFR parts 300-3, 301-10, and 301-70 of the Federal Travel Regulation (FTR).
§ 334.1470 Caribbean Sea and Vieques Sound, in vicinity of Eastern Vieques; bombing and gunnery target area. ( a ) *The danger zone.* From Punta Conejo on the south coast of Vieques at latitude 18°06′30′′, longitude 65°22′33′′; thence to latitude 18°03′00′′, longitude 65°21′00′′; thence to latitude 18°03′00′′, longitude 65°15′30′′; thence to latitude 18°11′30′′, longitude 65°14′30′′; thence to latitude 18°12′00′′, longitude 65°20′00′′; and thence to Cabellos Colorados on the north coast of Vieques at latitude 18°09′49′′, longitude 65°23′27′′.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) It will be open to navigation at all times except when firing is being conducted. At such times, no persons or surface vessels, except those patrolling the area, shall enter or remain within the danger area. Prior to conducting each firing or dropping of ordnance the danger area will be patrolled to insure that no watercraft are within the danger area. Any watercraft in the vicinity will be warned that practice firing is about to take place and advised to vacate the area.
( 2 ) The regulations will be enforced by the Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Caribbean, U.S. Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, and such agencies and subordinate commands as he/she may designate.
(Sec. 7, 40 Stat. 266, (33 U.S.C. 1))
[39 FR 27133, July 25, 1974, as amended at 46 FR 29935, June 4, 1981. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17559, Apr. 10, 1997]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al. on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants. 

__________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF FILING REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS

Plaintiffs hereby give notice of filing request for issuance of summons to Defendant Sam 

Bankman-Fried. 

Dated: December 8, 2022 Respectfully Submitted,

By: /s/ Adam Moskowitz 

Adam M. Moskowitz 

Florida Bar No. 984280

adam@moskowitz-law.com 

Joseph M. Kaye 

Florida Bar No. 117520

joseph@moskowitz-law.com

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

By: /s/ David Boies 

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice) 

Alex Boies

(Pro Hac Vice) 

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street

Armonk, NY 10504

Phone: (914) 749–8200

dboies@bsfllp.com 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2022 Page 1 of 2
By: /s/ Stephen Neal Zack 

Stephen Neal Zack

Florida Bar No. 145215

Hon. Ursula Ungaro (Ret.)

Florida Bar No. 200883

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800

Miami, FL 33131

Office: 305-539-8400

szack@bsfllp.com

uungaro@bsfllp.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Class

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/08/2022 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 12.1

DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND RATIO OF
EARNINGS

TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DISTRIBUTIONS

(in thousands, except ratios)



|                                                                        |  |                   |        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | -------
|                                                                        |  | December 31, 2008
|Net income from continuing operations, less preferred distributions     |  | $                 | 27,539 
|Preferred distributions                                                 |  |                   | 71,426 
|Interest expense                                                        |  |                   | 195,148
|                                                                        |  |                   |        
|Earnings before fixed charges                                           |  | $                 | 294,113
|                                                                        |  |                   |        
|                                                                        | 
|Interest expense                                                        |  | $                 | 195,148
|Interest costs capitalized                                              |  |                   | 53,456 
|                                                                        |  |                   |        
|Total fixed charges                                                     |  |                   | 248,604
|                                                                        | 
|Preferred distributions                                                 |  |                   | 71,426 
|                                                                        |  |                   |        
|Total fixed charges and preferred distributions                         |  | $                 | 320,030
|                                                                        |  |                   |        
|                                                                        | 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                      |  |                   | 1.18   
|                                                                        |  |                   |        
|                                                                        | 
|Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred distributions |  |                   | N/A    
|                                                                        |  |                   |        

N/A  the ratio is less than 1.0; deficit of $25.9 million exists for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The calculation of earnings includes $311.3 million of non-cash depreciation expense.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 544 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 544

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the small issuer 
  exemption from pro rata allocation of interest expense of financial 
                  institutions to tax-exempt interest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

  Mr. Hayworth (for himself and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the small issuer 
  exemption from pro rata allocation of interest expense of financial 
                  institutions to tax-exempt interest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN SMALL ISSUER EXEMPTION FROM PRO RATA ALLOCATION 
              OF INTEREST EXPENSE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO TAX-
              EXEMPT INTEREST.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraphs (C) and (D) of section 265(b)(3) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (pro rata allocation of interest 
expense of financial institutions to tax-exempt interest) are each 
amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' each place it appears and inserting 
``$25,000,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to bonds issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 102-118.170 Will GSA continue to maintain a centralized numbering system for Government transportation documents?

No. For GTRs, GBLs, and commercial TDs, each agency must create a unique numbering system to account for and prevent duplicate numbers.

[87 FR 32325, May 31, 2022]