alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102-37.200 What certifications must a SASP make when requesting surplus property for donation? When requesting or applying for property, you must certify that: ( a ) You are the agency of the State designated under State law that has legal authority under 40 U.S.C. 549 and GSA regulations, to receive property for distribution within the State to eligible donees as defined in this part.
( b ) No person with supervisory or managerial duties in your State's donation program is debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in the donation program.
( c ) The property is usable and needed within the State by: ( 1 ) A public agency for one or more public purposes.
( 2 ) An eligible nonprofit organization or institution which is exempt from taxation under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501), for the purpose of education or public health (including research for any such purpose).
( 3 ) An eligible nonprofit activity for programs for older individuals.
( 4 ) A service educational activity (SEA), for DOD-generated property only.
( d ) When property is picked up by, or shipped to, your SASP, you have adequate and available funds, facilities, and personnel to provide accountability, warehousing, proper maintenance, and distribution of the property.
( e ) When property is distributed by your SASP to a donee, or when delivery is made directly from a holding agency to a donee pursuant to a State distribution document, you have determined that the donee acquiring the property is eligible within the meaning of the Property Act and GSA regulations, and that the property is usable and needed by the donee.
[67 FR 2584, Jan. 18, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 23868, Apr. 25, 2006]
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Heera Lee,Director of Finance and Principal Accounting Officer of AML CommunicationsInc., (the “Company), certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-KSB of AML Communications, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: June 29, 2007      |
|-------------------------------|
| /s/ HEERA LEE                 |   |
| Heera Lee,                    |
| Director of  Finance          |
| Principal  Accounting Officer |

 

----
§ 102-39.40 How does the exchange/sale authority differ from the disposal process for excess/surplus personal property? ( a ) The primary difference is that sales proceeds or exchange allowances may be used to acquire similar replacement personal property that is still needed under the exchange/sale authority as described in this part; whereas under the more frequently used excess/surplus disposal process, you would not be able to use sales proceeds or exchange allowances to acquire replacement personal property.
( b ) Your use of the exchange/sale authority is optional and should be considered when needed replacement assets may be acquired under the provisions of this part. If exchange/sale is not practicable (for example, if conducting an exchange/sale transaction is not cost effective), you should dispose of the property through the excess/surplus disposal process by reporting the property as excess, as addressed in part 102-36 of this chapter.
( c ) In the excess/surplus disposal process, any net proceeds from the sale of surplus property generally must be forwarded to the miscellaneous receipts account at the United States Treasury, and thus would not be available to you for use in acquiring similar replacement property or for any other purpose. You may use the exchange/sale authority in the acquisition of personal property even if the acquisition is under a services contract, as long as the property acquired under the services contract is similar to the property exchanged or sold (e.g., for a service life extension program (SLEP), exchange allowances or sales proceeds would be available for replacement of similar items, but not for services).
[88 FR 25511, Apr. 27, 2023]
#### § 102-37.330 Must the costs of providing support under a cooperative agreement be reimbursed by the parties receiving such support?

The parties to a cooperative agreement must decide among themselves the extent to which the costs of the services they provide must be reimbursed. Their decision should be reflected in the cooperative agreement itself. As a general rule, the Economy Act (31 U.S.C. 1535) would require a Federal agency receiving services from a SASP to reimburse the SASP for those services. Since SASPs are not Federal agencies, the Economy Act would not require them to reimburse Federal agencies for services provided by such agencies. In this situation, the Federal agencies would have to determine whether or not their own authorities would permit them to provide services to SASPs without reimbursement. If a Federal agency is reimbursed by a SASP for services provided under a cooperative agreement, it must credit that payment to the fund or appropriation that incurred the related costs.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-61190)pertaining to the Delta Apparel, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan and Delta Apparel, Inc. 2001 IncentiveStock Award Plan of our reports dated September 6, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Delta Apparel, Inc., Delta Apparel, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Delta Apparel, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form10-K/A for the year ended July 1, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPAtlanta, Georgia
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 22-14404-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS/MA YNARD 

DEMARCUS ANTOINE MILLS, 

Petitioner, 

V. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., 

Respondents. 

________________ ! 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Shaniek Mills Maynard's 

Report and Recommendation ("Report"), issued on January 9, 2024. (DE 14). The Report 

recommends dismissing Petitioner Demarcus Antoine Mills' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 as untimely. Petitioner filed objections on January 18, 2024 (DE 15) 

and Respondents filed a response on January 21, 2024 (DE 16). 

I have conducted a de novo review of the Report, objections, and the record as a whole. 

Upon review, I agree with Magistrate Judge Mills Maynard's conclusions, and find that the 

reasoning in the Report is accurate and thorough. Further, I find that Movant has failed to make "a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" sufficient to support the issuance of a 

Certificate of Appealability. See 28 U.S.C. §2253. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

(1) The Report (DE 14) is ADOPTED. 

(2) Movant's Objections (DE 15) are OVERRULED. 

(3) Petitioner Demarcus Antoine Mills' Petition under 28 U.S.C. §2254 for Writ of 

Case 2:22-cv-14404-DMM Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2024 Page 1 of 2
Habeas Corpus (DE 1) is DENIED. 

(4) A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. 

(5) Final Judgment shall be entered by separate Order. 

SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this:ZJda 

cc: Honorable Shaniek Mills Maynard 

Counsel of Record 

2 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:22-cv-14404-DMM Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2024 Page 2 of 2
§ 102-37.395 How can a SASP determine whether an applicant meets any required approval, accreditation, or licensing requirements? A SASP may accept the following documentation as evidence that an applicant has met established standards for the operation of its educational or health program: ( a ) A certificate or letter from a nationally recognized accrediting agency affirming the applicant meets the agency's standards and requirements.
( b ) The applicant's appearance on a list with other similarly approved or accredited institutions or programs when that list is published by a State, regional, or national accrediting authority.
( c ) Letters from State or local authorities (such as a board of health or a board of education) stating that the applicant meets the standards prescribed for approved or accredited institutions and organizations.
( d ) In the case of educational activities, letters from three accredited or State-approved institutions that students from the applicant institution have been and are being accepted.
( e ) In the case of public health institutions, licensing may be accepted as evidence of approval, provided the licensing authority prescribes the medical requirements and standards for the professional and technical services of the institution.
( f ) The awarding of research grants to the institution by a recognized authority such as the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Education, or by similar national advisory council or organization.
Case 2:22-cv-14411-JEM   Document 34   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:22-cv-14411-JEM   Document 34   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023   Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
OF THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

I, William J. Nydam, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Endocare, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  December 2, 2003
    
    
    
    
    
    /s/ WILLIAM J.
NYDAM
William J. Nydam
    President and Chief Operating Office
(principal executive officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                       354
<INVENTORY>                                      9,565
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,819
<PP&E>                                          40,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,445
<BONDS>                                         17,367
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,221
<SALES>                                        106,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,995
<CGS>                                           66,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    68
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,143
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,002
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                141
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (171)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (30)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### § 101-39.304 Modification or installation of accessory equipment.

The modification of a GSA Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS) vehicle or the permanent installation of accessory equipment on these vehicles may be accomplished only when approved by GSA. For the purpose of this regulation, permanent installation means the actual bolting, fitting, or securing of an item to the vehicle. Such modification or installation of accessory equipment must be considered by the agency as essential for the accomplishment of the agency's mission. The request for such modification or installation shall be forwarded to the appropriate GSA IFMS regional fleet manager for consideration. Accessory equipment or other after-market items which project an inappropriate appearance, such as radar detectors, will not be used on GSA IFMS vehicles. Decorative items (i.e., bumper stickers and decals) will not be used on IFMS vehicles unless authorized by the Director, Fleet Management Division, GSA.

[56 FR 59890, Nov. 26, 1991]
§ 101-4.225 Educational institutions eligible to submit transition plans. ( a ) *Application.* This section applies to each educational institution to which §§ 101-4.300 through 101-4.310 apply that: ( 1 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1972; or
( 2 ) Admitted students of only one sex as regular students as of June 23, 1965, but thereafter admitted, as regular students, students of the sex not admitted prior to June 23, 1965.
( b ) *Provision for transition plans.* An educational institution to which this section applies shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 101-4.300 through 101-4.310.
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Aloha Gentlemen; 

Michael Drew <mdrew@hotelmolokai.com> 

Saturday, March 22, 2014 8:10 PM 

Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Faulk, Scott (OST); Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Support for Mokulele's Kalaupapa EAS proposal 

As a Molokai resident who travels on Mokulele Airlines for business, I am writing to voice my support for awarding the 

Kalaupapa essential air service contract to Mokulele. I have always found it to be very easy to make reservations for 

Mokulele flights, and their service coverage and reliability makes it very convenient for me to make connecting flights to 

other islands or the mainland. I have also been impresses with mokulele's commitment to safety. I have heard that it is 

Mokulele's policy to staff each flight with two pilots, even though this is not a requirement of the FAA. 

I urge you to award the contract to give the resident of Kalaupapa and its visitors a safe, reliable and convenient means 

to travel. 

With Warmest Aloha .... 

Michael Drew 

General Manager- Hotel Molokai & Hula Shores Bar 

P 0 Box 10201300 Kamehameha V Hwy I Kaunakakai, Hl96748 

p. 808.553.5347 X 3398 I f. 808.553.5047 

"-=:'-'-"'"'=':'"=:':"--="="-'-'-' I www.hotelmolokai.com 

1
#### § 102-42.80 To whom do “we”, “you”, and their variants refer?

Use of pronouns “we”, “you”, and their variants throughout this subpart refers to the employing agency.
#### § 102-74.235 Are occupant agencies required to cooperate with the Designated Official in the implementation of the emergency plans and the staffing of the emergency organization?

Yes, all occupant agencies of a facility must fully cooperate with the Designated Official in the implementation of the emergency plans and the staffing of the emergency organization.
#### § 102-72.100 What are Executive agencies' responsibilities under a utility service delegation of authority from GSA?

With this delegation, Executive agencies have the authority to negotiate and execute utility services contracts for periods over one year but not exceeding ten years for their use and benefit. Agencies also have the authority to intervene in utility rate proceedings to represent the consumer interests of the Federal Government, if so provided in the delegation of authority.
§ 3.6 Information furnished to Board—financial and operating reports. ( a ) To enable the Board to monitor the performance of the Postal Service during the most recent accounting periods for which data are available, postal management shall furnish the Board (on a quarterly basis) financial and operating statements for the fiscal year to date, addressing the following categories: ( 1 ) Mail volume by class;
( 2 ) Income and expense by principal categories;
( 3 ) Balance sheet information;
( 4 ) Statement of cash flow; and
( 5 ) Service quality measurements.
( b ) These statements shall include, where applicable, comparable figures for the previous year and the current year's plan.
( c ) At the reasonable request of the Board, Postal management shall furnish to the Board such other information as the Board deems necessary.
[73 FR 78983, Dec. 24, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 10013, Feb. 18, 2021; 86 FR 24713, May 10, 2021]