alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P. 1



# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart

Document

Number: 

# 120 ) IV-G& Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:57

AM Sheet 120of 232P. 2 

# 87-j a

^ UNITED STATE S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY WASHINGTON

, D.C. 20460 

### -FE B 

### 2 6 198

8

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Thoma s S . Foley Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Foley : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r February18 , 198 8 lette r relaying th e concern s o f you r constituent , Mr . Lyn Hartma n o f Hartma n Oil , Inc. , regarding EPA' s regulatoryproposa l t o requir e onboar d canister s o n ne wvehicle s t o contro l refueling emissions . T o assis t yo u wit hyou r response , I hav e enclose d a copyo f ou r proposa l fo r you r review . Sectio n E (page s 31177-31182 ) explain s EPA' s overal l rational e fo r proposin g onboar d controls . I f yo u woul d lik e furthe r detail s o f ou r analysis , pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso n o f th e Standard s Developmen t an

d Suppor t Branc ho f th e Emissio n Contro l TechnologyDivision , 256 5 Plymout hRoad , Ann Arbor , Michiga n 4810 5 (FT S 374-827 0 o r Commercia l (313 ) 668-4270) . . , Wit hreferenc e t o ou r propose d gasolin e volatilit y regulations , w e ar e proposing t o contro l gasolin e volatilit ya s on e mean s o f reducing th e emission s o f volatil e organi c compound s (VOCs) . Thes e compound s ar e a majo r precurso r o f ozone , whic hi s thi s nation' s mos t widesprea d an d intractabl e ai r pollutio n problem . Ove r 6 0 urba n area s currentl yd o no t mee t th e ai r qualit ystandar d establishe d fo r ozone . Moto r vehicle s accoun t fo r one-thir d t o one-hal f o f th e tota l VO C emissions , an

d gasolin e volatilit yreduction s represen t th e singl e larges t remaining sourc e o f VO C contro l available . Ther e ar e a numbe r o f comple xissue s tha t mus t b e analyze d whe n volatilit ycontro l i s considered . W e hav e spen t a grea t dea l o f tim e analyzing thes e issue s an d makin g ou r finding s availabl e t o al l intereste d partie s fo r critiqu e an d comment . W e hel d a publi c hearing i n Octobe r an d hav e receive d numerou s additiona l comment s o n thi s rulemaking . W e wil l full y conside r al l o f thes e comment s i n developing ou r fina l regulatoryanalysis .P. 3



### -2 - W e wil l plac e th

e lette r fro

m Mr . Hartma

ninou r publi c docke t an

dfull y consider his , comment s inth e next phas e o f ou

r rulemakin

g process . Le t m

e kno w i f w e ca nbe of further assistance . Sincerel y yours , ORIGINAL5IGNE D B Y
. 

### j'^iojij] , mi SO

N RichardD' . Wilson Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s Enclosur e cc : Docke t A-87-1 1 Docke t A-85-2 1 Prepare d by : For

mLetter:sal:2/24/88:AL88078 6 - An n Arbor , M I bcc : Administrato r Deput yAdministrato r AO/Mr . Dereme r . Regio n 1 0 Congressiona l Liaison/Quinn Docke t A-87-1 1 an

d Docke t A-85-2 1 c/ o Jacki e McManu s
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7204** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DONNA MILLWOOD ROBERTS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the Unite d States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg
. Henry F. Floyd , District Judge. ( 7:09

- cr - 00654

- HFF

- 2; 7:10

- cv - 70297

- HFF )

Submitted : November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Donna Millwood Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished op inions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donna Millwood Roberts seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order dismissing her 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court ’ s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless th e district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court ’ s order was entered on the docket

on June 21, 2011
. The notice of appeal was filed , at the earliest, on August 30 , 2011
. *

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). Because Roberts failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 102-118.205 May my agency pay a subcontractor or agent functioning as a warehouseman for the TSP providing service under the bill of lading?

No, your agency may only pay the TSP with whom it has a contract. The bill of lading will list the TSP with whom the Government has a contract.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-22967-BB

SHANNA BYNES,

Plaintiff,

v.

RGS FINANCIAL INC,

Defendant.

________________________/

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion by Plaintiff Shanna Bynes (“Plaintiff”) 

for Entry of a Final Judgment against Defendant RGS Financial Inc (“Defendant”). ECF No. [22].

Without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint or any liability otherwise, 

Defendant has agreed to entry of this Amended Final Judgment. In light of Defendant’s agreement 

and the attorney’s fees awarded to counsel for Plaintiff, the Court finds that good cause exists for

entry of the Amended Final Judgment. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as 

follows:

1. The Court approves, as reasonable, the attorneys’ fees awarded to counsel for 

Plaintiff in the amount of $19,720.00, with $11,787.50 attributable to Thomas Patti, 

Esq., at a rate of $575 an hour and $7,932.50 attributable to Victor Zabaleta, Esq., 

at a rate of $475 an hour.

2. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Shanna Bynes and against Defendant RGS

Financial, Inc., in the amount of $1,001.00 plus $19,720.00 in attorneys’ fees.

3. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, all pending motions are denied as MOOT

and all deadlines are TERMINATED.

Case 1:22-cv-22967-BB Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 1:22-cv-22967-BB

Page 2 of 2

4. This case shall remain CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida on April 21, 2023.

__________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-22967-BB Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 102-117.300 Do the decisions on temporary nonuse, suspension and debarment go beyond the agency? ( a ) Temporary nonuse does not go beyond the agency.
( b ) Decisions on suspended or debarred TSPs do go beyond the agency and are available to the general public on the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by GSA at *https://sam.gov/*.
[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 51394, Aug. 20, 2010; 87 FR 32323, May 31, 2022]
§ 954.14 Presiding officers. ( a ) The Chief Administrative Law Judge shall assign each case to an Administrative Law Judge qualified in accordance with law to preside over the hearing. Such assignments shall be made, so far as practical, in rotation.
( b ) The presiding officer shall have authority to: ( 1 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 2 ) Examine witnesses;
( 3 ) Rule upon matters of evidence and procedure;
( 4 ) Order any pleading amended upon motion of a party at any time prior to the close of the hearing;
( 5 ) Maintain discipline and decorum and exclude from the hearing any person acting in an indecorous manner;
( 6 ) Require the filing of briefs on any matter upon which he or she is required to rule;
( 7 ) Order prehearing conferences for the settlement or simplification of issues by consent of the parties;
( 8 ) Order the proceeding reopened at any time prior to his or her decision for the receipt of additional evidence;
( 9 ) Render an initial decision.
[36 FR 11567, June 16, 1971, as amended at 38 FR 17217, June 29, 1973; 38 FR 20263, July 30, 1973; 62 FR 66998, Dec. 23, 1997]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Fantastic Financial Corporation
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
L.  Hodges,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                              /S/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 102-38.145 Must we allow for inspection of the personal property to be sold?

Yes, you must allow for an electronic or physical inspection of the personal property to be sold. You must allow prospective bidders sufficient time for inspection. If inspection is restricted to electronic inspections only, due to unusual circumstances prohibiting physical inspection, you must notify your General Services Administration Regional Personal Property Office in writing, with the circumstances surrounding this restriction at least 3 days prior to the start of the screening period.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RASHEED MALCOLM,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 418 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of May, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in affirming the trial court’s admission of Petitioner’s videotaped interrogation, over Petitioner’s objection?

(2) Where videotaped interrogations are sought to be admitted at trial, what steps should the parties and trial courts take to reduce undue prejudice while providing appropriate context so th at jurors can appropriately weigh

the evidence?
----

|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Consumers,      Inc.; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Based      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this      report; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | The      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant      and have: |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | The      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to      the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent      functions): |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 14, 2008                                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                          |   |
| /s/ Paul R. Cook                                              |   |
| Paul      R. Cook                                             |   |
| Executive Vice      President and Chief      FinancialOfficer |

----
# Instructions to Grantees

# Segregation of Duties Worksheet

# Instructions to MO

# Worksheet Review

# Internal Control Analysis
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employee Benefit Plans Under Collective Bargaining

              																	Weiss, Abraham, 1913-. 						*Employee Benefit Plans Under Collective Bargaining : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 946*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off, 										1949,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4373,			accessed on September 9, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
V

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5629

To permit the Asphalt Commander to be placed under a foreign registry.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 3, 2000

Mr. SHAW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Armed Services

A BILL

To permit the Asphalt Commander to be placed under a

foreign registry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER TO FOREIGN REGISTRY PERMITTED.

4 Notwithstanding any other law or agreement with the

5 United States Government, the Asphalt Commander,

6 United States Official Number 663105, may be trans7 ferred to or placed under a foreign registry or sold to a

8 person that is not a citizen of the United States and trans9 ferred to or placed under a foreign registry.

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsImprovements to the FATOLA computer program including added actively controlled landing gear subroutinesModifications to a multi-degree-of-freedom flexible aircraft take-off and landing analysis (FATOLA) computer program, including a provision for actively controlled landing gears to expand the programs simulation capabilities, are presented. Supplemental instructions for preparation of data and for use of the modified program are included.Document ID19860014117Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMall, G. H.*(Computer Sciences Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1983Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-166069TAO-33842NAS 1.26:166069Accession Number86N23588Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-16078Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860014117.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 101-28.306-5 Safeguards.

Agencies shall establish internal controls to ensure that the customer access codes assigned for their accounts are properly protected. It is by use of these access codes that orders are accepted by the CSC and these codes determine the ship-to points for all orders filled by the CSC with the exception of orders picked up at the CSC by the customer. GSA will not change the ship-to location associated with the customer access code except upon receipt of a written request to do so, signed by a duly authorized official of the customer activity.
##### 



`XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       XXXXXXXXXX
                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXX      XXXXX
                             XXXXX          XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                             XXXXX           XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                             XXXXX             XXXXXXXXXX



      XXXXXXXXXX          XXXXXXXXXX       XXXX         XXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXX      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     XXXXX       XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
   XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXX     XXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
   XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXXXX   XXXXXXX    XXXXX
   XXXXX               XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX    XXXXX
   XXXXX               XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXX
   XXXXX               XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXX
   XXXXX               XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX    XXXXX
   XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXX      XXXXX    XXXXX  XXX  XXXXX    XXXXX
   XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XXXXX   X   XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXX      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     XXXXX       XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
      XXXXXXXXXX          XXXXXXXXXX       XXXXX       XXXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX`
#### § 101-30.403-2 Management codes.

For internal use within an agency, alphabetic codes excluding letters “I” and “O” may be prefixed or suffixed to the national stock number as CM7520-00-123-4567 or 7520-00-123-4567CM, as required for supply management operations. Numeric codes shall not be affixed immediately adjacent to or as a part of the national stock number, nor shall codes be intermingled in the national stock number.

[41 FR 11309, Mar. 18, 1976]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 29, 2002 (the "Report") by Overhill Farms, Inc.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Registrant.


                                 By:  /s/ Richard A. Horvath
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Richard A. Horvath  Senior Vice President,
                                      Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
H. R. 5110

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street in Riverside,

California, as the ‘‘George E. Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street in

Riverside, California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘George

E. Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘George E. Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.