alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5465

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for a National Living

Organ Donor Registry.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 2000

Mr. INSLEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for

a National Living Organ Donor Registry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Organ Donor Enhance5 ment Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM FOR LIVING ORGAN

7 DONOR REGISTRY.

8 Part H of title III of the Public Health Service Act

9 (42 U.S.C. 273 et seq.) is amended by inserting after sec10 tion 372 the following section:
2

•HR 5465 IH

1 ‘‘LIVING ORGAN DONOR REGISTRY

2 ‘‘SEC. 372A. (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall

3 by contract establish and maintain a National Living

4 Organ Donor Registry (referred to in this section as the

5 ‘Donor Registry’) for the purpose of increasing the num6 ber of transplants for recipients suitably matched to bio7 logically unrelated individuals who are willing to be living

8 donors of organs.

9 ‘‘(b) ADMINISTRATION OF REGISTRY.—The Donor

10 Registry shall be under the general supervision of the Sec11 retary, and under the direction of a board of directors that

12 includes representatives of patients, living organ donors,

13 recipients of living organ donations, transplant centers,

14 and such other individuals as the Secretary determines to

15 be appropriate.

16 ‘‘(c) FUNCTIONS.—The Registry shall—

17 ‘‘(1) establish a system for finding living organ

18 donors suitably matched to unrelated recipients for

19 organ transplantation;

20 ‘‘(2) carry out a program for the recruitment of

21 living organ donors;

22 ‘‘(3) carry out informational and educational

23 activities;
3

•HR 5465 IH

1 ‘‘(4) annually update information to account for

2 changes in the status of individuals as potential liv3 ing organ donors;

4 ‘‘(5) provide for a system of patient advocacy,

5 and provide case management services for patients;

6 and

7 ‘‘(6) provide for a system of donor advocacy

8 (separate from the system for patient advocacy), and

9 provide case management services for living organ

10 donors and for potential such donors to whom the

11 Donor Registry has provided a notice that the poten12 tial donor may be suitably matched to a particular

13 patient.

14 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—For the

15 purpose of carrying out this section, there are authorized

16 to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for

17 each of the fiscal years 2001 through 2005.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 9

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 153-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2024 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 153-10 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2024 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


and
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002










Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Roger S. Marcus, Chief Executive
Officer, and Howard N. Feist III, Chief Financial Officer, of American Biltrite
Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:




The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of the Company
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  August
14, 2008


/s/ Roger S.
Marcus


Roger S.
Marcus


Chief
Executive Officer







/s/ Howard N. Feist
III


Howard N.
Feist III


Chief
Financial Officer
#### § 102-72.5 What is the scope of this part?

The real property policies contained in this part apply to Federal agencies, including GSA's Public Buildings Service (PBS), operating under, or subject to, the authorities of the Administrator of General Services.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-23661-PCH

ZEFLON LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v.

EN CORP USA, ENCORP

SWITZERLAND AG, and DOES 1 to 10, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

NOTICE OF STRIKING DOCKET ENTRY’S 24 & 25

Pursuant to the Clerk’s Notice, DE 26, notice is hereby given of striking docket entry’s 24 

and 25. The motion in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss with exhibits will be refiled.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Menachem M. Mayberg

 MENACHEM M. MAYBERG 

Florida Bar No: 0596744

SELTZER MAYBERG LLC.

10750 NW 6th Court

Miami, Florida 33168 

Tel: 305.444.1565

Fax: 305.444.1665

 m@smfirm.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 3, 2023, the foregoing document was filed with the Clerk of 

the Court via CM/ECF.

By: /s/ MMM 

Menachem Mayberg

Case 1:22-cv-23661-PCH Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2023 Page 1 of 1
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5475

To extend for 18 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of

title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 17, 2000

Ms. BALDWIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To extend for 18 additional months the period for which

chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

4 Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law

5 105–277, as amended by Public Law 106–5 and Public

6 Law 106–70, is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2000’’ each place it ap8 pears and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2001’’; and

9 (2) in subsection (a)—
2

•HR 5475 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘September 30, 1999’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘June 30, 2000’’; and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘October 1, 1999’’ and in4 serting ‘‘July 1, 2000’’.

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

7 on July 1, 2000.

Æ
Exhibit 31(a)



CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Richard Govatski, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NMXS.com, Inc.



2.   Based on my knowledge, this amended yearly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended yearly report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended yearly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended yearly report;



4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the a registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended yearly report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended yearly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



(c)  presented in this amended yearly report my conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date





5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and



(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.   I have indicated in this amended yearly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated:
October 18, 2005



/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Keith Guelpa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ R. Keith Guelpa    
|    |  | R. Keith Guelpa        
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    | 
|    |  | March 30, 2005
Exhibit 4.42


 


Summary
of the Rural Partnership Agreement, entered into on June 13, 2019, in connection with Fazenda Santa Luzia


 


Parties:
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, as the company interested in entering into a rural partnership
with Santa Luzia Agropecuária Ltda., and Santa Luzia Agropecuária Ltda., as the owner of the land.


 


Purpose:  Granting
of the possession, for a five-year term, of a total area equivalent to 1,112.80 useful hectares of Fazenda Santa Luzia for purposes
of the exploitation of the land under a rural partnership regime, by means of the sharing, by and among the parties, of the earnings
received from the crops/harvests arising from the aforementioned partnership. Santa Luzia Agropecuária Ltda. shall be entitled
to approximately 17% of the earnings therefrom (set at an average of 11.36 bags of soybean per hectare), and BrasilAgro –
Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas shall be entitled to the remaining 83%.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 661 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 661

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 1999

  Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the commercial 
operation of supersonic transport category aircraft that do not comply 
with stage 3 noise levels if the European Union adopts certain aircraft 
                           noise regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT CATEGORY 
              AIRCRAFT.

    If the European Union adopts Common Position (EC) No. 66/98 as a 
final regulation or adopts any similar final regulation, the Secretary 
of Transportation shall prohibit, after such date of adoption, the 
commercial operation of a civil supersonic transport category aircraft 
to or from an airport in the United States unless the Secretary finds 
that the aircraft complies with stage 3 noise levels.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 3, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 102-34.110 Must Government motor vehicles use Government license plates?

Yes, you must use Government license plates on Government motor vehicles, with the exception of motor vehicles exempted under § 102-34.160, § 102-34.175 or § 102-34.180.
EXHIBIT 32

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Safer
Shot, Inc. for the period ended, September 30, 2010, (the "Report")
I, John Lund, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Safer Shot, Inc.



Date: February 11, 2011               /s/John Lund
                             -------------------------------------------
                                         John Lund
                                         President
                                   (Principal Executive)
#### HENRY BREWSTER, Respondent, *v.*JOSEPH MANNING, Appellant.

*Stipulation*— when *it admits plaintiff’s case.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered on the report of a referee.

Upon the trial, the plaintiff relied upon a stipulation, as an admission of his cause of action, set forth in the complaint, and of the value of his services, as therein alleged. In these respects, the stipulation was as follows:

*“*The defendant hereby stipulates not to dispute, on the trial of this action, the rendering of the services and making the disbursements by the plaintiff for the defendant, as charged in the com*531plaint, and the amount and value of the same, as in the complaint alleged, without prejudice to the counter-claim set up in the defendant’s answer.”

The court held, that the referee was right in holding this to be, *in fact,*an admission that the plaintiff had rendered the services and made the disbursements charged in the complaint; and that the amount and value thereof were the sum alleged in the complaint, and entitled the plaintiff to judgment, unless the defendant established the counter-claim set up in his answer. And that, it would be too narrow a construction of this stipulation to hold that its sole object was to prevent the defendant from disputing the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action,, after he should have proved the same by satisfactory evidence.

The court further held, that it was not necessary, to prove the signature of the'attorney to the stipulation; nor that he was, in fact, the attorney of the defendant. If there were any doubt upon either of these questions, it was for the defendant to show that the attorney who subscribed the stipulation was not his attorney in the action ; or that the signature purporting to be his was not genuine.

*Jesse K.*Furlong, for the appellant. *Henry*Brewster, respondent, in person.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Daniels and Brady, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 3010.202 Participation in notice and comment proceedings. ( a ) *Comments.* The primary method for participating in notice and comment proceedings is through the filing of comments in accordance with § 3010.140. The notice and order initiating proceeding filed pursuant to § 3010.151 shall provide the deadline for filing comments, and if provided for, reply comments.
( b ) *Information requests.* The Commission, Chairman, or presiding officer may in its or their own discretion or, if requested by an interested person by motion, issue information requests pursuant to § 3010.170.
( c ) *Technical conferences.* The Commission, Chairman, or presiding officer may in its or their own discretion or, if requested by an interested person by motion, convene one or more off the record technical conferences to consider the matters being considered.
( d ) *Oral presentations.* The Commission, Chairman, or presiding officer may in its or their own discretion or, if requested by an interested person by motion, permit oral presentations regarding the matters being considered.
( e ) *Other procedures.* The Commission, the Chairman, or presiding officer may order additional procedures as appropriate.
¥-8-. Changemakertiy

your community.

From mentoring students to higher academic achievement, being
the first to respond when disaster strikes, helping families facing
hunger, restoring public lands, or even rehabilitating affordable
housing, you can help build a better future in your community.

Choose your future. Choose AmeriCorps.

AmeriCorps.gov/Serve



2>= An eriCorps

¥-8-. Changemakertiy

your community.

From mentoring students to higher academic achievement, being
the first to respond when disaster strikes, helping families facing
hunger, restoring public lands, or even rehabilitating affordable
housing, you can help build a better future in your community.

Choose your future. Choose AmeriCorps.

AmeriCorps.gov/Serve



¥-8-. Changemakertiy

your community.

From mentoring students to higher academic achievement, being
the first to respond when disaster strikes, helping families facing
hunger, restoring public lands, or even rehabilitating affordable
housing, you can help build a better future in your community.

Choose your future. Choose AmeriCorps.

AmeriCorps.gov/Serve
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.213-4 Rulings required.

Each decision of a hearing officer or responsible GSA official shall set forth his ruling on each finding, conclusion, or exception presented, and shall identify the requirement or requirements imposed by or pursuant to this subpart 101-6.2 with which it is found that the applicant or recipient has failed to comply.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cr-20508-PCH/Becerra-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

JUAN ARMAS-DENIS,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING R&R AND ADJUDICATING DEFENDANT 

GUILTY

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra’s 

Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on Change of Plea [ECF No. 117], which was entered on 

March 13, 2023. In the R&R, Judge Becerra found that the Defendant Juan Armas-Denis freely 

and voluntarily entered a plea of guilty as to Count I of the Superseding Indictment, which charges

Defendant with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 

Title 21, United States Code, Section 846.

Magistrate Judge Becerra recommends that this Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea, that 

Defendant be adjudicated guilty of Count I, and that a sentencing hearing be conducted for final 

disposition of this matter. The Court has reviewed Judge Becerra’s R&R, no objections have been 

filed, and the Court has been advised that no objections will be filed. Therefore, based on a de 

novo review of the evidence presented, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that (1) Magistrate Judge Becerra’s R&R on Change of 

Plea is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED in its entirety; (2) the Court accepts Defendant’s plea of 

guilty, and Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty as to Count I of the Superseding Indictment; and

(3) a sentencing hearing before the Honorable Paul C. Huck is set for Friday, June 2, 2023, at 

Case 1:22-cr-20508-PCH Document 132 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2023 Page 1 of 2
9:00 AM. Counsel are instructed to inform the Court of any scheduling conflicts as soon as 

possible.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida on March 14, 2023.

PAUL C. HUCK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra

Counsel of record

Case 1:22-cr-20508-PCH Document 132 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 102-33.210 How do we account for the use of our Government aircraft? To account for the use of Government aircraft, including your Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), you must document all flights and keep this documentation for two years after the date of the flight. For each flight, record the— ( a ) Aircraft's registration mark;
( b ) Owner and operator (the owner may not be the operator, as is the case when a CAS aircraft, owned commercially, is operated by U.S. Government personnel);
( c ) Purpose of the flight (the Governmental function that the aircraft was dispatched to perform);
( d ) Departure and destination points;
( e ) Flight date(s) and times;
( f ) Manifest (see § 102-33.165(g) and (h)); and
( g ) Name(s) of the pilot(s) and crewmembers.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-2999

___________ Roger Manuel Brandao, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an v. * Order of the Board of * Immigration Appeals John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the * [UNPUBLISHED] United States, * * Respondent. * *

___________ No. 02-3342

___________ Roger Manuel Brandao, * * Petitioner - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. John Ashcroft, Attorney General; * James W. Ziglar, Commissioner of * Immigration and Naturalization * Service; Curtis Aljets, St. Paul District * Director of the Immigration and * Naturalization Service; Brian Berg, * U.S. Marshal, * * Respondents - Appellees. *1 The Honorable Richard Goldberg, Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. -2- ___________ Submitted: November 20, 2003 Filed: January 26, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, LAY, and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Roger Manuel Brandao, a native of Portugal, appeals the district court's 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus to prevent the Immigration and Naturalization Service from reinstating his previous order of deportation. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the district court correctly denied Brandao's petition. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________