Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

Inside the Legislature

Find Your Legislator

Visiting the Legislature

Agendas, Schedules and

Calendars

Bill Information

Laws and Agency Rules

Legislative Committees

Legislative Agencies

Legislative Information

Center

E-mail Notifications

Civic Education

History of the State

Legislature

Outside the Legislature

Congress - the Other

Washington

TVW

Washington Courts

OFM Fiscal Note Website

RCWs > Title 36 > Chapter 36.70A Print Version | [No disponible en español]

Chapter 36.70A RCW

GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

Chapter Listing | RCW Dispositions

RCW Sections

36.70A.010 Legislative findings.

36.70A.011 Findings -- Rural lands.

36.70A.020 Planning goals.

36.70A.030 Definitions.

36.70A.035 Public participation -- Notice provisions.

36.70A.040 Who must plan -- Summary of requirements -- Development regulations must implement comprehensive plans.

36.70A.045 Phasing of comprehensive plan submittal.

36.70A.050 Guidelines to classify agriculture, forest, and mineral lands and critical areas.

36.70A.060 Natural resource lands and critical areas -- Development regulations.

36.70A.070 Comprehensive plans -- Mandatory elements.

36.70A.080 Comprehensive plans -- Optional elements.

36.70A.085 Comprehensive plans -- Port elements.

36.70A.090 Comprehensive plans -- Innovative techniques.

36.70A.100 Comprehensive plans--Must be coordinated.

36.70A.103 State agencies required to comply with comprehensive plans.

36.70A.106 Comprehensive plans -- Development regulations -- Transmittal to state -- Amendments -- Expedited review.

36.70A.108 Comprehensive plans -- Transportation element -- Multimodal transportation improvements and strategies.

36.70A.110 Comprehensive plans -- Urban growth areas.

36.70A.115 Comprehensive plans and development regulations must provide sufficient land capacity for development.

36.70A.120 Planning activities and capital budget decisions -- Implementation in conformity with comprehensive plan.

36.70A.130 Comprehensive plans -- Review procedures and schedules -- Amendments.

36.70A.1301 Request to amend urban growth area -- Timing -- Criteria.

36.70A.131 Mineral resource lands -- Review of related designations and development regulations.

36.70A.140 Comprehensive plans -- Ensure public participation.

36.70A.150 Identification of lands useful for public purposes.

36.70A.160 Identification of open space corridors -- Purchase authorized.

36.70A.165 Property designated as greenbelt or open space -- Not subject to adverse possession.

36.70A.170 Natural resource lands and critical areas -- Designations.

36.70A.171 Playing fields -- Compliance with this chapter.

36.70A.172 Critical areas -- Designation and protection -- Best available science to be used.

36.70A.175 Wetlands to be delineated in accordance with manual.

36.70A.177 Agricultural lands -- Innovative zoning techniques -- Accessory uses.

36.70A.180 Chapter implementation -- Intent.

36.70A.190 Technical assistance, procedural criteria, grants, and mediation services.

36.70A.200 Siting of essential public facilities -- Limitation on liability.

36.70A.210 Countywide planning policies.

36.70A.215 Review and evaluation program.

36.70A.250 Growth management hearings board -- Creation -- Members.

36.70A.252 Growth management hearings board -- Consolidation into environmental and land use hearings office.

36.70A.260 Growth management hearings board -- Regional panels.

36.70A.270 Growth management hearings board -- Conduct, procedure, and compensation.

36.70A.280 Growth management hearings board -- Matters subject to review.

36.70A.290 Growth management hearings board -- Petitions -- Evidence.

36.70A.295 Growth management hearings board -- Direct judicial review.

36.70A.300 Final orders.

36.70A.302 Growth management hearings board -- Determination of invalidity -- Vesting of development permits -- Interim controls.

36.70A.305 Expedited review.

36.70A.310 Growth management hearings board -- Limitations on appeal by the state.

36.70A.320 Presumption of validity -- Burden of proof -- Plans and regulations.

36.70A.3201 Growth management hearings board -- Legislative intent and finding.

36.70A.330 Noncompliance.

36.70A.335 Order of invalidity issued before July 27, 1997.

36.70A.340 Noncompliance and sanctions.

36.70A.345 Sanctions.

Legislature Home | Senate | House of Representatives | Contact Us | Search | Help
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

36.70A.350 New fully contained communities.

36.70A.360 Master planned resorts.

36.70A.362 Master planned resorts -- Existing resort may be included.

36.70A.365 Major industrial developments.

36.70A.367 Major industrial developments -- Master planned locations.

36.70A.368 Major industrial developments -- Master planned locations -- Reclaimed surface coal mine sites.

36.70A.370 Protection of private property.

36.70A.380 Extension of designation date.

36.70A.385 Environmental planning pilot projects.

36.70A.390 Moratoria, interim zoning controls -- Public hearing -- Limitation on length -- Exceptions.

36.70A.400 Accessory apartments.

36.70A.410 Treatment of residential structures occupied by persons with handicaps.

36.70A.420 Transportation projects -- Findings -- Intent.

36.70A.430 Transportation projects -- Collaborative review process.

36.70A.450 Family day-care provider's home facility -- County or city may not prohibit in residential or commercial area -- Conditions.

36.70A.460 Watershed restoration projects -- Permit processing -- Fish habitat enhancement project.

36.70A.470 Project review -- Amendment suggestion procedure -- Definitions.

36.70A.480 Shorelines of the state.

36.70A.481 Construction -- Chapter 347, Laws of 1995.

36.70A.490 Growth management planning and environmental review fund -- Established.

36.70A.500 Growth management planning and environmental review fund -- Awarding of grant or loan -- Procedures.

36.70A.510 General aviation airports.

36.70A.520 National historic towns -- Designation.

36.70A.530 Land use development incompatible with military installation not allowed -- Revision of comprehensive plans and development regulations.

36.70A.540 Affordable housing incentive programs -- Low-income housing units.

36.70A.550 Aquifer conservation zones.

36.70A.560 Viability of agricultural lands -- Deferral requirements -- Definition.

36.70A.5601 Viability of agricultural lands -- Ruckelshaus Center examination, report.

36.70A.570 Regulation of forest practices.

36.70A.695 Development regulations -- Jurisdictions specified -- Electric vehicle infrastructure.

VOLUNTARY STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM

36.70A.700 Purpose -- Intent -- 2011 c 360.

36.70A.702 Construction.

36.70A.703 Definitions.

36.70A.705 Voluntary stewardship program established -- Administered by commission -- Agency participation.

36.70A.710 Critical areas protection -- Alternative to RCW 36.70A.060 -- County's responsibilities -- Procedures.

36.70A.715 Funding by commission -- County's duties -- Watershed group established.

36.70A.720 Watershed group's duties -- Work plan -- Conditional priority funding.

36.70A.725 Technical review of work plan -- Time frame for action by director.

36.70A.730 Report by watershed group -- Director consults with statewide advisory committee.

36.70A.735 When work plan is not approved, fails, or is unfunded -- County's duties -- Rules.

36.70A.740 Commission's duties -- Timelines.

36.70A.745 Statewide advisory committee -- Membership.

36.70A.750 Agricultural operators -- Individual stewardship plan.

36.70A.755 Implementing the work plan.

36.70A.760 Agricultural operators -- Withdrawal from program.

36.70A.800 Role of growth strategies commission.

36.70A.900 Severability -- 1990 1st ex.s. c 17.

36.70A.901 Part, section headings not law -- 1990 1st ex.s. c 17.

36.70A.902 Section headings not law -- 1991 sp.s. c 32.

36.70A.903 Transfer of powers, duties, and functions.

36.70A.904 Conflict with federal requirements -- 2011 c 360.

Notes:

Agricultural lands -- Legislative directive of growth management act: See note following RCW 7.48.305.

Building permits--Evidence of adequate water supply required: RCW 19.27.097.

Expediting completion of projects of statewide significance -- Requirements of agreements: RCW 43.157.020.

Impact fees: RCW 82.02.050 through 82.02.100.

Population forecasts: RCW 43.62.035.

Regional transportation planning: Chapter 47.80 RCW.

Subdivision and short subdivision requirements: RCW 58.17.060, 58.17.110.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

36.70A.010

Legislative findings.

The legislature finds that uncoordinated and unplanned growth, together with a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in the conservation and the wise use of our lands, pose a threat to the environment,

sustainable economic development, and the health, safety, and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state. It is in the public interest that citizens, communities, local governments, and the private sector cooperate

and coordinate with one another in comprehensive land use planning. Further, the legislature finds that it is in the public interest that economic development programs be shared with communities experiencing insufficient

economic growth.

[1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 1.]

36.70A.011

Findings — Rural lands.

The legislature finds that this chapter is intended to recognize the importance of rural lands and rural character to Washington's economy, its people, and its environment, while respecting regional differences. Rural lands

and rural-based economies enhance the economic desirability of the state, help to preserve traditional economic activities, and contribute to the state's overall quality of life.

 The legislature finds that to retain and enhance the job base in rural areas, rural counties must have flexibility to create opportunities for business development. Further, the legislature finds that rural counties must have

the flexibility to retain existing businesses and allow them to expand. The legislature recognizes that not all business developments in rural counties require an urban level of services; and that many businesses in rural

areas fit within the definition of rural character identified by the local planning unit.

 Finally, the legislature finds that in defining its rural element under RCW 36.70A.070(5), a county should foster land use patterns and develop a local vision of rural character that will: Help preserve rural-based

economies and traditional rural lifestyles; encourage the economic prosperity of rural residents; foster opportunities for small-scale, rural-based employment and self-employment; permit the operation of rural-based

agricultural, commercial, recreational, and tourist businesses that are consistent with existing and planned land use patterns; be compatible with the use of the land by wildlife and for fish and wildlife habitat; foster the

private stewardship of the land and preservation of open space; and enhance the rural sense of community and quality of life.

[2002 c 212 § 1.]

36.70A.020

Planning goals.

The following goals are adopted to guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations of those counties and cities that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040. The

following goals are not listed in order of priority and shall be used exclusively for the purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations:

 (1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.

 (2) Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development.

 (3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.

 (4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing

housing stock.

 (5) Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for

unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities,

and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities.

 (6) Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions.

 (7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.

 (8) Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries, including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of productive forest lands and

productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses.

 (9) Open space and recreation. Retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities.

 (10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water.

 (11) Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts.

 (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy

and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards.

 (13) Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance.

[2002 c 154 § 1; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 2.]

36.70A.030

Definitions.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter.

 (1) "Adopt a comprehensive land use plan" means to enact a new comprehensive land use plan or to update an existing comprehensive land use plan.

 (2) "Agricultural land" means land primarily devoted to the commercial production of horticultural, viticultural, floricultural, dairy, apiary, vegetable, or animal products or of berries, grain, hay, straw, turf, seed, Christmas

trees not subject to the excise tax imposed by *RCW 84.33.100 through 84.33.140, finfish in upland hatcheries, or livestock, and that has long-term commercial significance for agricultural production.

 (3) "City" means any city or town, including a code city.

 (4) "Comprehensive land use plan," "comprehensive plan," or "plan" means a generalized coordinated land use policy statement of the governing body of a county or city that is adopted pursuant to this chapter.

 (5) "Critical areas" include the following areas and ecosystems: (a) Wetlands; (b) areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water; (c) fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas; (d) frequently

flooded areas; and (e) geologically hazardous areas. "Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas" does not include such artificial features or constructs as irrigation delivery systems, irrigation infrastructure, irrigation

canals, or drainage ditches that lie within the boundaries of and are maintained by a port district or an irrigation district or company.

 (6) "Department" means the department of commerce.

 (7) "Development regulations" or "regulation" means the controls placed on development or land use activities by a county or city, including, but not limited to, zoning ordinances, critical areas ordinances, shoreline

master programs, official controls, planned unit development ordinances, subdivision ordinances, and binding site plan ordinances together with any amendments thereto. A development regulation does not include a

decision to approve a project permit application, as defined in RCW 36.70B.020, even though the decision may be expressed in a resolution or ordinance of the legislative body of the county or city.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (8) "Forest land" means land primarily devoted to growing trees for long-term commercial timber production on land that can be economically and practically managed for such production, including Christmas trees

subject to the excise tax imposed under *RCW 84.33.100 through 84.33.140, and that has long-term commercial significance. In determining whether forest land is primarily devoted to growing trees for long-term

commercial timber production on land that can be economically and practically managed for such production, the following factors shall be considered: (a) The proximity of the land to urban, suburban, and rural

settlements; (b) surrounding parcel size and the compatibility and intensity of adjacent and nearby land uses; (c) long-term local economic conditions that affect the ability to manage for timber production; and (d) the

availability of public facilities and services conducive to conversion of forest land to other uses.

 (9) "Geologically hazardous areas" means areas that because of their susceptibility to erosion, sliding, earthquake, or other geological events, are not suited to the siting of commercial, residential, or industrial

development consistent with public health or safety concerns.

 (10) "Long-term commercial significance" includes the growing capacity, productivity, and soil composition of the land for long-term commercial production, in consideration with the land's proximity to population areas,

and the possibility of more intense uses of the land.

 (11) "Minerals" include gravel, sand, and valuable metallic substances.

 (12) "Public facilities" include streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreational facilities, and

schools.

 (13) "Public services" include fire protection and suppression, law enforcement, public health, education, recreation, environmental protection, and other governmental services.

 (14) "Recreational land" means land so designated under **RCW 36.70A.1701 and that, immediately prior to this designation, was designated as agricultural land of long-term commercial significance under RCW

36.70A.170. Recreational land must have playing fields and supporting facilities existing before July 1, 2004, for sports played on grass playing fields.

 (15) "Rural character" refers to the patterns of land use and development established by a county in the rural element of its comprehensive plan:

 (a) In which open space, the natural landscape, and vegetation predominate over the built environment;

 (b) That foster traditional rural lifestyles, rural-based economies, and opportunities to both live and work in rural areas;

 (c) That provide visual landscapes that are traditionally found in rural areas and communities;

 (d) That are compatible with the use of the land by wildlife and for fish and wildlife habitat;

 (e) That reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development;

 (f) That generally do not require the extension of urban governmental services; and

 (g) That are consistent with the protection of natural surface water flows and groundwater and surface water recharge and discharge areas.

 (16) "Rural development" refers to development outside the urban growth area and outside agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands designated pursuant to RCW 36.70A.170. Rural development can consist of a

variety of uses and residential densities, including clustered residential development, at levels that are consistent with the preservation of rural character and the requirements of the rural element. Rural development does

not refer to agriculture or forestry activities that may be conducted in rural areas.

 (17) "Rural governmental services" or "rural services" include those public services and public facilities historically and typically delivered at an intensity usually found in rural areas, and may include domestic water

systems, fire and police protection services, transportation and public transit services, and other public utilities associated with rural development and normally not associated with urban areas. Rural services do not include

storm or sanitary sewers, except as otherwise authorized by RCW 36.70A.110(4).

 (18) "Urban governmental services" or "urban services" include those public services and public facilities at an intensity historically and typically provided in cities, specifically including storm and sanitary sewer systems,

domestic water systems, street cleaning services, fire and police protection services, public transit services, and other public utilities associated with urban areas and normally not associated with rural areas.

 (19) "Urban growth" refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the location of buildings, structures, and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with the primary use of land for the

production of food, other agricultural products, or fiber, or the extraction of mineral resources, rural uses, rural development, and natural resource lands designated pursuant to RCW 36.70A.170. A pattern of more intensive

rural development, as provided in RCW 36.70A.070(5)(d), is not urban growth. When allowed to spread over wide areas, urban growth typically requires urban governmental services. "Characterized by urban growth" refers

to land having urban growth located on it, or to land located in relationship to an area with urban growth on it as to be appropriate for urban growth.

 (20) "Urban growth areas" means those areas designated by a county pursuant to RCW 36.70A.110.

 (21) "Wetland" or "wetlands" means areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a

prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created

from nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands

created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas created to

mitigate conversion of wetlands.

[2012 c 21 § 1. Prior: 2009 c 565 § 22; 2005 c 423 § 2; 1997 c 429 § 3; 1995 c 382 § 9; prior: 1994 c 307 § 2; 1994 c 257 § 5; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 3.]

Notes:

 Reviser's note: *(1) RCW 84.33.100 through 84.33.118 were repealed or decodified by 2001 c 249 §§ 15 and 16. RCW 84.33.120 was repealed by 2001 c 249 § 16 and by 2003 c 170 § 7.

 **(2) RCW 36.70A.1701 expired June 30, 2006.

 Intent -- 2005 c 423: "The legislature recognizes the need for playing fields and supporting facilities for sports played on grass as well as the need to preserve agricultural land of long-term

commercial significance. With thoughtful and deliberate planning, and adherence to the goals and requirements of the growth management act, both needs can be met.

 The legislature acknowledges the state's interest in preserving the agricultural industry and family farms, and recognizes that the state's rich and productive lands enable agricultural production.

Because of its unique qualities and limited quantities, designated agricultural land of long-term commercial significance is best suited for agricultural and farm uses, not recreational uses.

 The legislature acknowledges also that certain local governments have either failed or neglected to properly plan for population growth and the sufficient number of playing fields and supporting

facilities needed to accommodate this growth. The legislature recognizes that citizens responded to this lack of planning, fields, and supporting facilities by constructing nonconforming fields and

facilities on agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance. It is the intent of the legislature to permit the continued existence and use of these fields and facilities in very limited circumstances

if specific criteria are satisfied within a limited time frame. It is also the intent of the legislature to grant this authorization without diminishing the designation and preservation requirements of the

growth management act pertaining to Washington's invaluable farmland." [2005 c 423 § 1.]

 Effective date -- 2005 c 423: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,

and takes effect immediately [May 12, 2005]." [2005 c 423 § 7.]

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Finding -- Intent -- 1994 c 307: "The legislature finds that it is in the public interest to identify and provide long-term conservation of those productive natural resource lands that are critical to and

can be managed economically and practically for long-term commercial production of food, fiber, and minerals. Successful achievement of the natural resource industries' goal set forth in RCW

36.70A.020 requires the conservation of a land base sufficient in size and quality to maintain and enhance those industries and the development and use of land use techniques that discourage uses

incompatible to the management of designated lands. The 1994 amendment to RCW 36.70A.030(8) (section 2(8), chapter 307, Laws of 1994) is intended to clarify legislative intent regarding the

designation of forest lands and is not intended to require every county that has already complied with the interim forest land designation requirement of RCW 36.70A.170 to review its actions until the

adoption of its comprehensive plans and development regulations as provided in RCW 36.70A.060(3)." [1994 c 307 § 1.]
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 Effective date -- 1994 c 257 § 5: "Section 5 of this act shall take effect July 1, 1994." [1994 c 257 § 25.]

 Severability -- 1994 c 257: See note following RCW 36.70A.270.

36.70A.035

Public participation — Notice provisions.

(1) The public participation requirements of this chapter shall include notice procedures that are reasonably calculated to provide notice to property owners and other affected and interested individuals, tribes, government

agencies, businesses, school districts, and organizations of proposed amendments to comprehensive plans and development regulation. Examples of reasonable notice provisions include:

 (a) Posting the property for site-specific proposals;

 (b) Publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county, city, or general area where the proposal is located or that will be affected by the proposal;

 (c) Notifying public or private groups with known interest in a certain proposal or in the type of proposal being considered;

 (d) Placing notices in appropriate regional, neighborhood, ethnic, or trade journals; and

 (e) Publishing notice in agency newsletters or sending notice to agency mailing lists, including general lists or lists for specific proposals or subject areas.

 (2)(a) Except as otherwise provided in (b) of this subsection, if the legislative body for a county or city chooses to consider a change to an amendment to a comprehensive plan or development regulation, and the change

is proposed after the opportunity for review and comment has passed under the county's or city's procedures, an opportunity for review and comment on the proposed change shall be provided before the local legislative

body votes on the proposed change.

 (b) An additional opportunity for public review and comment is not required under (a) of this subsection if:

 (i) An environmental impact statement has been prepared under chapter 43.21C RCW for the pending resolution or ordinance and the proposed change is within the range of alternatives considered in the environmental

impact statement;

 (ii) The proposed change is within the scope of the alternatives available for public comment;

 (iii) The proposed change only corrects typographical errors, corrects cross-references, makes address or name changes, or clarifies language of a proposed ordinance or resolution without changing its effect;

 (iv) The proposed change is to a resolution or ordinance making a capital budget decision as provided in RCW 36.70A.120; or

 (v) The proposed change is to a resolution or ordinance enacting a moratorium or interim control adopted under RCW 36.70A.390.

 (3) This section is prospective in effect and does not apply to a comprehensive plan, development regulation, or amendment adopted before July 27, 1997.

[1999 c 315 § 708; 1997 c 429 § 9.]

Notes:

 Part headings and captions not law -- 1999 c 315: See RCW 28A.315.901.

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

36.70A.040

Who must plan — Summary of requirements — Development regulations must implement comprehensive plans.

(1) Each county that has both a population of fifty thousand or more and, until May 16, 1995, has had its population increase by more than ten percent in the previous ten years or, on or after May 16, 1995, has had its

population increase by more than seventeen percent in the previous ten years, and the cities located within such county, and any other county regardless of its population that has had its population increase by more than

twenty percent in the previous ten years, and the cities located within such county, shall conform with all of the requirements of this chapter. However, the county legislative authority of such a county with a population of

less than fifty thousand population may adopt a resolution removing the county, and the cities located within the county, from the requirements of adopting comprehensive land use plans and development regulations under

this chapter if this resolution is adopted and filed with the department by December 31, 1990, for counties initially meeting this set of criteria, or within sixty days of the date the office of financial management certifies that a

county meets this set of criteria under subsection (5) of this section. For the purposes of this subsection, a county not currently planning under this chapter is not required to include in its population count those persons

confined in a correctional facility under the jurisdiction of the department of corrections that is located in the county.

 Once a county meets either of these sets of criteria, the requirement to conform with all of the requirements of this chapter remains in effect, even if the county no longer meets one of these sets of criteria.

 (2) The county legislative authority of any county that does not meet either of the sets of criteria established under subsection (1) of this section may adopt a resolution indicating its intention to have subsection (1) of

this section apply to the county. Each city, located in a county that chooses to plan under this subsection, shall conform with all of the requirements of this chapter. Once such a resolution has been adopted, the county and

the cities located within the county remain subject to all of the requirements of this chapter.

 (3) Any county or city that is initially required to conform with all of the requirements of this chapter under subsection (1) of this section shall take actions under this chapter as follows: (a) The county legislative authority

shall adopt a countywide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210; (b) the county and each city located within the county shall designate critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands, and adopt

development regulations conserving these designated agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands and protecting these designated critical areas, under RCW 36.70A.170 and 36.70A.060; (c) the county shall

designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110; (d) if the county has a population of fifty thousand or more, the county and each city located within the county shall adopt a

comprehensive plan under this chapter and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan on or before July 1, 1994, and if the county has a population of less than fifty thousand,

the county and each city located within the county shall adopt a comprehensive plan under this chapter and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan by January 1, 1995, but

if the governor makes written findings that a county with a population of less than fifty thousand or a city located within such a county is not making reasonable progress toward adopting a comprehensive plan and

development regulations the governor may reduce this deadline for such actions to be taken by no more than one hundred eighty days. Any county or city subject to this subsection may obtain an additional six months

before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter notifying the *department of community, trade, and economic development of its need prior to the deadline for adopting both a

comprehensive plan and development regulations.

 (4) Any county or city that is required to conform with all the requirements of this chapter, as a result of the county legislative authority adopting its resolution of intention under subsection (2) of this section, shall take

actions under this chapter as follows: (a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a county-wide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210; (b) the county and each city that is located within the county shall adopt

development regulations conserving agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands it designated under RCW 36.70A.060 within one year of the date the county legislative authority adopts its resolution of

intention; (c) the county shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110; and (d) the county and each city that is located within the county shall adopt a comprehensive plan and

development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan not later than four years from the date the county legislative authority adopts its resolution of intention, but a county or city may

obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter notifying the *department of community, trade, and economic development of its need prior to the

deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations.

 (5) If the office of financial management certifies that the population of a county that previously had not been required to plan under subsection (1) or (2) of this section has changed sufficiently to meet either of the sets

of criteria specified under subsection (1) of this section, and where applicable, the county legislative authority has not adopted a resolution removing the county from these requirements as provided in subsection (1) of this

section, the county and each city within such county shall take actions under this chapter as follows: (a) The county legislative authority shall adopt a countywide planning policy under RCW 36.70A.210; (b) the county and

each city located within the county shall adopt development regulations under RCW 36.70A.060 conserving agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands it designated within one year of the certification by the

office of financial management; (c) the county shall designate and take other actions related to urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110; and (d) the county and each city located within the county shall adopt a

comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan within four years of the certification by the office of financial management, but a county or city may
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

obtain an additional six months before it is required to have adopted its development regulations by submitting a letter notifying the *department of community, trade, and economic development of its need prior to the

deadline for adopting both a comprehensive plan and development regulations.

 (6) A copy of each document that is required under this section shall be submitted to the department at the time of its adoption.

 (7) Cities and counties planning under this chapter must amend the transportation element of the comprehensive plan to be in compliance with this chapter and chapter 47.80 RCW no later than December 31, 2000.

[2000 c 36 § 1; 1998 c 171 § 1; 1995 c 400 § 1; 1993 sp.s. c 6 § 1; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 4.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: The "department of community, trade, and economic development" was renamed the "department of commerce" by 2009 c 565.

 Effective date -- 1995 c 400: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,

and shall take effect immediately [May 16, 1995]." [1995 c 400 § 6.]

 Effective date -- 1993 sp.s. c 6: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,

and shall take effect June 1, 1993." [1993 sp.s. c 6 § 7.]

36.70A.045

Phasing of comprehensive plan submittal.

The department may adopt a schedule to permit phasing of comprehensive plan submittal for counties and cities planning under RCW 36.70A.040. This schedule shall not permit a comprehensive plan to be submitted

greater than one hundred eighty days past the date that the plan was required to be submitted and shall be used to facilitate expeditious review and interjurisdictional coordination of comprehensive plans and development

regulations.

[1991 sp.s. c 32 § 15.]

36.70A.050

Guidelines to classify agriculture, forest, and mineral lands and critical areas.

(1) Subject to the definitions provided in RCW 36.70A.030, the department shall adopt guidelines, under chapter 34.05 RCW, no later than September 1, 1990, to guide the classification of: (a) Agricultural lands; (b) forest

lands; (c) mineral resource lands; and (d) critical areas. The department shall consult with the department of agriculture regarding guidelines for agricultural lands, the department of natural resources regarding forest lands

and mineral resource lands, and the department of ecology regarding critical areas.

 (2) In carrying out its duties under this section, the department shall consult with interested parties, including but not limited to: (a) Representatives of cities; (b) representatives of counties; (c) representatives of

developers; (d) representatives of builders; (e) representatives of owners of agricultural lands, forest lands, and mining lands; (f) representatives of local economic development officials; (g) representatives of

environmental organizations; (h) representatives of special districts; (i) representatives of the governor's office and federal and state agencies; and (j) representatives of Indian tribes. In addition to the consultation required

under this subsection, the department shall conduct public hearings in the various regions of the state. The department shall consider the public input obtained at such public hearings when adopting the guidelines.

 (3) The guidelines under subsection (1) of this section shall be minimum guidelines that apply to all jurisdictions, but also shall allow for regional differences that exist in Washington state. The intent of these guidelines is

to assist counties and cities in designating the classification of agricultural lands, forest lands, mineral resource lands, and critical areas under RCW 36.70A.170.

 (4) The guidelines established by the department under this section regarding classification of forest lands shall not be inconsistent with guidelines adopted by the department of natural resources.

[1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 5.]

36.70A.060

Natural resource lands and critical areas — Development regulations.

(1)(a) Except as provided in *RCW 36.70A.1701, each county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, and each city within such county, shall adopt development regulations on or before September 1,

1991, to assure the conservation of agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands designated under RCW 36.70A.170. Regulations adopted under this subsection may not prohibit uses legally existing on any parcel prior

to their adoption and shall remain in effect until the county or city adopts development regulations pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040. Such regulations shall assure that the use of lands adjacent to agricultural, forest, or mineral

resource lands shall not interfere with the continued use, in the accustomed manner and in accordance with best management practices, of these designated lands for the production of food, agricultural products, or timber,

or for the extraction of minerals.

 (b) Counties and cities shall require that all plats, short plats, development permits, and building permits issued for development activities on, or within five hundred feet of, lands designated as agricultural lands, forest

lands, or mineral resource lands, contain a notice that the subject property is within or near designated agricultural lands, forest lands, or mineral resource lands on which a variety of commercial activities may occur that

are not compatible with residential development for certain periods of limited duration. The notice for mineral resource lands shall also inform that an application might be made for mining-related activities, including mining,

extraction, washing, crushing, stockpiling, blasting, transporting, and recycling of minerals.

 (2) Each county and city shall adopt development regulations that protect critical areas that are required to be designated under RCW 36.70A.170. For counties and cities that are required or choose to plan under RCW

36.70A.040, such development regulations shall be adopted on or before September 1, 1991. For the remainder of the counties and cities, such development regulations shall be adopted on or before March 1, 1992.

 (3) Such counties and cities shall review these designations and development regulations when adopting their comprehensive plans under RCW 36.70A.040 and implementing development regulations under RCW

36.70A.120 and may alter such designations and development regulations to insure consistency.

 (4) Forest land and agricultural land located within urban growth areas shall not be designated by a county or city as forest land or agricultural land of long-term commercial significance under RCW 36.70A.170 unless the

city or county has enacted a program authorizing transfer or purchase of development rights.

[2005 c 423 § 3; 1998 c 286 § 5; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 21; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 6.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: RCW 36.70A.1701 expired June 30, 2006.

 Intent -- Effective date -- 2005 c 423: See notes following RCW 36.70A.030.

36.70A.070

Comprehensive plans — Mandatory elements.

The comprehensive plan of a county or city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall consist of a map or maps, and descriptive text covering objectives, principles, and standards used to develop the

comprehensive plan. The plan shall be an internally consistent document and all elements shall be consistent with the future land use map. A comprehensive plan shall be adopted and amended with public participation as

provided in RCW 36.70A.140.

 Each comprehensive plan shall include a plan, scheme, or design for each of the following:

 (1) A land use element designating the proposed general distribution and general location and extent of the uses of land, where appropriate, for agriculture, timber production, housing, commerce, industry, recreation,
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

open spaces, general aviation airports, public utilities, public facilities, and other land uses. The land use element shall include population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth. The land

use element shall provide for protection of the quality and quantity of groundwater used for public water supplies. Wherever possible, the land use element should consider utilizing urban planning approaches that promote

physical activity. Where applicable, the land use element shall review drainage, flooding, and storm water run-off in the area and nearby jurisdictions and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those

discharges that pollute waters of the state, including Puget Sound or waters entering Puget Sound.

 (2) A housing element ensuring the vitality and character of established residential neighborhoods that: (a) Includes an inventory and analysis of existing and projected housing needs that identifies the number of

housing units necessary to manage projected growth; (b) includes a statement of goals, policies, objectives, and mandatory provisions for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing, including singlefamily residences; (c) identifies sufficient land for housing, including, but not limited to, government-assisted housing, housing for low-income families, manufactured housing, multifamily housing, and group homes and

foster care facilities; and (d) makes adequate provisions for existing and projected needs of all economic segments of the community.

 (3) A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs for such

capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies

sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan

element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element.

 (4) A utilities element consisting of the general location, proposed location, and capacity of all existing and proposed utilities, including, but not limited to, electrical lines, telecommunication lines, and natural gas lines.

 (5) Rural element. Counties shall include a rural element including lands that are not designated for urban growth, agriculture, forest, or mineral resources. The following provisions shall apply to the rural element:

 (a) Growth management act goals and local circumstances. Because circumstances vary from county to county, in establishing patterns of rural densities and uses, a county may consider local circumstances, but shall

develop a written record explaining how the rural element harmonizes the planning goals in RCW 36.70A.020 and meets the requirements of this chapter.

 (b) Rural development. The rural element shall permit rural development, forestry, and agriculture in rural areas. The rural element shall provide for a variety of rural densities, uses, essential public facilities, and rural

governmental services needed to serve the permitted densities and uses. To achieve a variety of rural densities and uses, counties may provide for clustering, density transfer, design guidelines, conservation easements,

and other innovative techniques that will accommodate appropriate rural densities and uses that are not characterized by urban growth and that are consistent with rural character.

 (c) Measures governing rural development. The rural element shall include measures that apply to rural development and protect the rural character of the area, as established by the county, by:

 (i) Containing or otherwise controlling rural development;

 (ii) Assuring visual compatibility of rural development with the surrounding rural area;

 (iii) Reducing the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development in the rural area;

 (iv) Protecting critical areas, as provided in RCW 36.70A.060, and surface water and groundwater resources; and

 (v) Protecting against conflicts with the use of agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands designated under RCW 36.70A.170.

 (d) Limited areas of more intensive rural development. Subject to the requirements of this subsection and except as otherwise specifically provided in this subsection (5)(d), the rural element may allow for limited areas

of more intensive rural development, including necessary public facilities and public services to serve the limited area as follows:

 (i) Rural development consisting of the infill, development, or redevelopment of existing commercial, industrial, residential, or mixed-use areas, whether characterized as shoreline development, villages, hamlets, rural

activity centers, or crossroads developments.

 (A) A commercial, industrial, residential, shoreline, or mixed-use area shall be subject to the requirements of (d)(iv) of this subsection, but shall not be subject to the requirements of (c)(ii) and (iii) of this subsection.

 (B) Any development or redevelopment other than an industrial area or an industrial use within a mixed-use area or an industrial area under this subsection (5)(d)(i) must be principally designed to serve the existing and

projected rural population.

 (C) Any development or redevelopment in terms of building size, scale, use, or intensity shall be consistent with the character of the existing areas. Development and redevelopment may include changes in use from

vacant land or a previously existing use so long as the new use conforms to the requirements of this subsection (5);

 (ii) The intensification of development on lots containing, or new development of, small-scale recreational or tourist uses, including commercial facilities to serve those recreational or tourist uses, that rely on a rural

location and setting, but that do not include new residential development. A small-scale recreation or tourist use is not required to be principally designed to serve the existing and projected rural population. Public services

and public facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the recreation or tourist use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl;

 (iii) The intensification of development on lots containing isolated nonresidential uses or new development of isolated cottage industries and isolated small-scale businesses that are not principally designed to serve the

existing and projected rural population and nonresidential uses, but do provide job opportunities for rural residents. Rural counties may allow the expansion of small-scale businesses as long as those small-scale

businesses conform with the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to RCW 36.70A.030(15). Rural counties may also allow new small-scale businesses to utilize a site previously

occupied by an existing business as long as the new small-scale business conforms to the rural character of the area as defined by the local government according to RCW 36.70A.030(15). Public services and public

facilities shall be limited to those necessary to serve the isolated nonresidential use and shall be provided in a manner that does not permit low-density sprawl;

 (iv) A county shall adopt measures to minimize and contain the existing areas or uses of more intensive rural development, as appropriate, authorized under this subsection. Lands included in such existing areas or uses

shall not extend beyond the logical outer boundary of the existing area or use, thereby allowing a new pattern of low-density sprawl. Existing areas are those that are clearly identifiable and contained and where there is a

logical boundary delineated predominately by the built environment, but that may also include undeveloped lands if limited as provided in this subsection. The county shall establish the logical outer boundary of an area of

more intensive rural development. In establishing the logical outer boundary, the county shall address (A) the need to preserve the character of existing natural neighborhoods and communities, (B) physical boundaries,

such as bodies of water, streets and highways, and land forms and contours, (C) the prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries, and (D) the ability to provide public facilities and public services in a manner that does

not permit low-density sprawl;

 (v) For purposes of (d) of this subsection, an existing area or existing use is one that was in existence:

 (A) On July 1, 1990, in a county that was initially required to plan under all of the provisions of this chapter;

 (B) On the date the county adopted a resolution under RCW 36.70A.040(2), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter under RCW 36.70A.040(2); or

 (C) On the date the office of financial management certifies the county's population as provided in RCW 36.70A.040(5), in a county that is planning under all of the provisions of this chapter pursuant to RCW

36.70A.040(5).

 (e) Exception. This subsection shall not be interpreted to permit in the rural area a major industrial development or a master planned resort unless otherwise specifically permitted under RCW 36.70A.360 and

36.70A.365.

 (6) A transportation element that implements, and is consistent with, the land use element.

 (a) The transportation element shall include the following subelements:

 (i) Land use assumptions used in estimating travel;

 (ii) Estimated traffic impacts to state-owned transportation facilities resulting from land use assumptions to assist the department of transportation in monitoring the performance of state facilities, to plan improvements

for the facilities, and to assess the impact of land-use decisions on state-owned transportation facilities;

 (iii) Facilities and services needs, including:

 (A) An inventory of air, water, and ground transportation facilities and services, including transit alignments and general aviation airport facilities, to define existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future

planning. This inventory must include state-owned transportation facilities within the city or county's jurisdictional boundaries;
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (B) Level of service standards for all locally owned arterials and transit routes to serve as a gauge to judge performance of the system. These standards should be regionally coordinated;

 (C) For state-owned transportation facilities, level of service standards for highways, as prescribed in chapters 47.06 and 47.80 RCW, to gauge the performance of the system. The purposes of reflecting level of service

standards for state highways in the local comprehensive plan are to monitor the performance of the system, to evaluate improvement strategies, and to facilitate coordination between the county's or city's six-year street,

road, or transit program and the office of financial management's ten-year investment program. The concurrency requirements of (b) of this subsection do not apply to transportation facilities and services of statewide

significance except for counties consisting of islands whose only connection to the mainland are state highways or ferry routes. In these island counties, state highways and ferry route capacity must be a factor in meeting

the concurrency requirements in (b) of this subsection;

 (D) Specific actions and requirements for bringing into compliance locally owned transportation facilities or services that are below an established level of service standard;

 (E) Forecasts of traffic for at least ten years based on the adopted land use plan to provide information on the location, timing, and capacity needs of future growth;

 (F) Identification of state and local system needs to meet current and future demands. Identified needs on state-owned transportation facilities must be consistent with the statewide multimodal transportation plan

required under chapter 47.06 RCW;

 (iv) Finance, including:

 (A) An analysis of funding capability to judge needs against probable funding resources;

 (B) A multiyear financing plan based on the needs identified in the comprehensive plan, the appropriate parts of which shall serve as the basis for the six-year street, road, or transit program required by RCW 35.77.010

for cities, RCW 36.81.121 for counties, and RCW 35.58.2795 for public transportation systems. The multiyear financing plan should be coordinated with the ten-year investment program developed by the office of financial

management as required by RCW 47.05.030;

 (C) If probable funding falls short of meeting identified needs, a discussion of how additional funding will be raised, or how land use assumptions will be reassessed to ensure that level of service standards will be met;

 (v) Intergovernmental coordination efforts, including an assessment of the impacts of the transportation plan and land use assumptions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions;

 (vi) Demand-management strategies;

 (vii) Pedestrian and bicycle component to include collaborative efforts to identify and designate planned improvements for pedestrian and bicycle facilities and corridors that address and encourage enhanced community

access and promote healthy lifestyles.

 (b) After adoption of the comprehensive plan by jurisdictions required to plan or who choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, local jurisdictions must adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if

the development causes the level of service on a locally owned transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the transportation element of the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or

strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made concurrent with the development. These strategies may include increased public transportation service, ride sharing programs, demand management, and

other transportation systems management strategies. For the purposes of this subsection (6), "concurrent with the development" means that improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development, or that a

financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six years.

 (c) The transportation element described in this subsection (6), the six-year plans required by RCW 35.77.010 for cities, RCW 36.81.121 for counties, and RCW 35.58.2795 for public transportation systems, and the tenyear investment program required by RCW 47.05.030 for the state, must be consistent.

 (7) An economic development element establishing local goals, policies, objectives, and provisions for economic growth and vitality and a high quality of life. The element shall include: (a) A summary of the local

economy such as population, employment, payroll, sectors, businesses, sales, and other information as appropriate; (b) a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local economy defined as the commercial and

industrial sectors and supporting factors such as land use, transportation, utilities, education, workforce, housing, and natural/cultural resources; and (c) an identification of policies, programs, and projects to foster

economic growth and development and to address future needs. A city that has chosen to be a residential community is exempt from the economic development element requirement of this subsection.

 (8) A park and recreation element that implements, and is consistent with, the capital facilities plan element as it relates to park and recreation facilities. The element shall include: (a) Estimates of park and recreation

demand for at least a ten-year period; (b) an evaluation of facilities and service needs; and (c) an evaluation of intergovernmental coordination opportunities to provide regional approaches for meeting park and recreational

demand.

 (9) It is the intent that new or amended elements required after January 1, 2002, be adopted concurrent with the scheduled update provided in RCW 36.70A.130. Requirements to incorporate any such new or amended

elements shall be null and void until funds sufficient to cover applicable local government costs are appropriated and distributed by the state at least two years before local government must update comprehensive plans as

required in RCW 36.70A.130.

[2010 1st sp.s. c 26 § 6; 2005 c 360 § 2; (2005 c 477 § 1 expired August 31, 2005); 2004 c 196 § 1; 2003 c 152 § 1. Prior: 2002 c 212 § 2; 2002 c 154 § 2; 1998 c 171 § 2; 1997 c 429 § 7; 1996 c 239 § 1; prior: 1995 c 400

§ 3; 1995 c 377 § 1; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 7.]

Notes:

 Expiration date -- 2005 c 477 § 1: "Section 1 of this act expires August 31, 2005." [2005 c 477 § 3.]

 Effective date -- 2005 c 477: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,

and takes effect immediately [May 13, 2005]." [2005 c 477 § 2.]

 Findings -- Intent -- 2005 c 360: "The legislature finds that regular physical activity is essential to maintaining good health and reducing the rates of chronic disease. The legislature further finds

that providing opportunities for walking, biking, horseback riding, and other regular forms of exercise is best accomplished through collaboration between the private sector and local, state, and

institutional policymakers. This collaboration can build communities where people find it easy and safe to be physically active. It is the intent of the legislature to promote policy and planning efforts

that increase access to inexpensive or free opportunities for regular exercise in all communities around the state." [2005 c 360 § 1.]

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Construction -- Application -- 1995 c 400: "A comprehensive plan adopted or amended before May 16, 1995, shall be considered to be in compliance with RCW 36.70A.070 or 36.70A.110, as

in effect before their amendment by this act, if the comprehensive plan is in compliance with RCW 36.70A.070 and 36.70A.110 as amended by this act. This section shall not be construed to alter the

relationship between a countywide planning policy and comprehensive plans as specified under RCW 36.70A.210.

 As to any appeal relating to compliance with RCW 36.70A.070 or 36.70A.110 pending before a growth management hearings board on May 16, 1995, the board may take up to an additional

ninety days to resolve such appeal. By mutual agreement of all parties to the appeal, this additional ninety-day period may be extended." [1995 c 400 § 4.]

 Effective date -- 1995 c 400: See note following RCW 36.70A.040.

36.70A.080

Comprehensive plans — Optional elements.

(1) A comprehensive plan may include additional elements, items, or studies dealing with other subjects relating to the physical development within its jurisdiction, including, but not limited to:

 (a) Conservation;

 (b) Solar energy; and

 (c) Recreation.

 (2) A comprehensive plan may include, where appropriate, subarea plans, each of which is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (3)(a) Cities that qualify as a receiving city may adopt a comprehensive plan element and associated development regulations that apply within receiving areas under chapter 39.108 RCW.

 (b) For purposes of this subsection, the terms "receiving city" and "receiving area" have the same meanings as provided in RCW 39.108.010.

[2011 c 318 § 801; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 8.]

Notes:

 Rules -- 2011 c 318: See note following RCW 39.108.005.

36.70A.085

Comprehensive plans — Port elements.

(1) Comprehensive plans of cities that have a marine container port with annual operating revenues in excess of sixty million dollars within their jurisdiction must include a container port element.

 (2) Comprehensive plans of cities that include all or part of a port district with annual operating revenues in excess of twenty million dollars may include a marine industrial port element. Prior to adopting a marine

industrial port element under this subsection (2), the commission of the applicable port district must adopt a resolution in support of the proposed element.

 (3) Port elements adopted under subsections (1) and (2) of this section must be developed collaboratively between the city and the applicable port, and must establish policies and programs that:

 (a) Define and protect the core areas of port and port-related industrial uses within the city;

 (b) Provide reasonably efficient access to the core area through freight corridors within the city limits; and

 (c) Identify and resolve key land use conflicts along the edge of the core area, and minimize and mitigate, to the extent practicable, incompatible uses along the edge of the core area.

 (4) Port elements adopted under subsections (1) and (2) of this section must be: 

 (a) Completed and approved by the city according to the schedule specified in RCW 36.70A.130; and

 (b) Consistent with the economic development, transportation, and land use elements of the city's comprehensive plan, and consistent with the city's capital facilities plan.

 (5) In adopting port elements under subsections (1) and (2) of this section, cities and ports must: Ensure that there is consistency between the port elements and the port comprehensive scheme required under chapters

53.20 and 53.25 RCW; and retain sufficient planning flexibility to secure emerging economic opportunities.

 (6) In developing port elements under subsections (1) and (2) of this section, a city may utilize one or more of the following approaches:

 (a) Creation of a port overlay district that protects container port uses;

 (b) Use of industrial land banks;

 (c) Use of buffers and transition zones between incompatible uses;

 (d) Use of joint transportation funding agreements;

 (e) Use of policies to encourage the retention of valuable warehouse and storage facilities;

 (f) Use of limitations on the location or size, or both, of nonindustrial uses in the core area and surrounding areas; and

 (g) Use of other approaches by agreement between the city and the port.

 (7) The *department of community, trade, and economic development must provide matching grant funds to cities meeting the requirements of subsection (1) of this section to support development of the required

container port element.

 (8) Any planned improvements identified in port elements adopted under subsections (1) and (2) of this section must be transmitted by the city to the transportation commission for consideration of inclusion in the

statewide transportation plan required under RCW 47.01.071.

[2009 c 514 § 2.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: The "department of community, trade, and economic development" was renamed the "department of commerce" by 2009 c 565.

 Findings -- Intent -- 2009 c 514: "(1) The legislature finds that Washington's marine container ports operate within a complex system of marine terminal operations, truck and train transportation

corridors, and industrial services that together support a critical amount of our state and national economy, including key parts of our state's manufacturing and agricultural sectors, and directly create

thousands of high-wage jobs throughout our region.

 (2) The legislature further finds that the container port services are increasingly challenged by the conversion of industrial properties to nonindustrial uses, leading to competing and incompatible

uses that can hinder port operations, restrict efficient movement of freight, and limit the opportunity for improvements to existing port-related facilities.

 (3) It is the intent of the legislature to ensure that local land use decisions are made in consideration of the long-term and widespread economic contribution of our international container ports and

related industrial lands and transportation systems, and to ensure that container ports continue to function effectively alongside vibrant city waterfronts." [2009 c 514 § 1.]

36.70A.090

Comprehensive plans — Innovative techniques.

A comprehensive plan should provide for innovative land use management techniques, including, but not limited to, density bonuses, cluster housing, planned unit developments, and the transfer of development rights.

[1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 9.]

36.70A.100

Comprehensive plans — Must be coordinated.

The comprehensive plan of each county or city that is adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 shall be coordinated with, and consistent with, the comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 of other counties

or cities with which the county or city has, in part, common borders or related regional issues.

[1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 10.]
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

36.70A.103

State agencies required to comply with comprehensive plans.

State agencies shall comply with the local comprehensive plans and development regulations and amendments thereto adopted pursuant to this chapter except as otherwise provided in RCW 71.09.250 (1) through (3),

71.09.342, and 72.09.333.

 The provisions of chapter 12, Laws of 2001 2nd sp. sess. do not affect the state's authority to site any other essential public facility under RCW 36.70A.200 in conformance with local comprehensive plans and

development regulations adopted pursuant to chapter 36.70A RCW.

[2002 c 68 § 15; 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 § 203; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 4.]

Notes:

 Purpose -- Severability -- Effective date -- 2002 c 68: See notes following RCW 36.70A.200.

 Intent -- Severability -- Effective dates -- 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12: See notes following RCW 71.09.250.

36.70A.106

Comprehensive plans — Development regulations — Transmittal to state — Amendments — Expedited review.

(1) Each county and city proposing adoption of a comprehensive plan or development regulations under this chapter shall notify the department of its intent to adopt such plan or regulations at least sixty days prior to final

adoption. State agencies including the department may provide comments to the county or city on the proposed comprehensive plan, or proposed development regulations, during the public review process prior to

adoption.

 (2) Each county and city planning under this chapter shall transmit a complete and accurate copy of its comprehensive plan or development regulations to the department within ten days after final adoption.

 (3)(a) Any amendments for permanent changes to a comprehensive plan or development regulation that are proposed by a county or city to its adopted plan or regulations shall be submitted to the department in the

same manner as initial plans and development regulations under this section. Any amendments to a comprehensive plan or development regulations that are adopted by a county or city shall be transmitted to the

department in the same manner as the initial plans and regulations under this section.

 (b) Each county and city planning under this chapter may request expedited review for any amendments for permanent changes to a development regulation. Upon receiving a request for expedited review, and after

consultation with other state agencies, the department may grant expedited review if the department determines that expedited review does not compromise the state's ability to provide timely comments related to

compliance with the goals and requirements of this chapter or on other matters of state interest. Cities and counties may adopt amendments for permanent changes to a development regulation immediately following the

granting of the request for expedited review by the department.

[2004 c 197 § 1; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 8.]

36.70A.108

Comprehensive plans — Transportation element — Multimodal transportation improvements and strategies.

(1) The transportation element required by RCW 36.70A.070 may include, in addition to improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development authorized under RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b), multimodal

transportation improvements or strategies that are made concurrent with the development. These transportation improvements or strategies may include, but are not limited to, measures implementing or evaluating:

 (a) Multiple modes of transportation with peak and nonpeak hour capacity performance standards for locally owned transportation facilities; and

 (b) Modal performance standards meeting the peak and nonpeak hour capacity performance standards.

 (2) Nothing in this section or RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b) shall be construed as prohibiting a county or city planning under RCW 36.70A.040 from exercising existing authority to develop multimodal improvements or strategies

to satisfy the concurrency requirements of this chapter.

 (3) Nothing in this section is intended to affect or otherwise modify the authority of jurisdictions planning under RCW 36.70A.040.

[2005 c 328 § 1.]

36.70A.110

Comprehensive plans — Urban growth areas.

(1) Each county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is

not urban in nature. Each city that is located in such a county shall be included within an urban growth area. An urban growth area may include more than a single city. An urban growth area may include territory that is

located outside of a city only if such territory already is characterized by urban growth whether or not the urban growth area includes a city, or is adjacent to territory already characterized by urban growth, or is a designated

new fully contained community as defined by RCW 36.70A.350.

 (2) Based upon the growth management population projection made for the county by the office of financial management, the county and each city within the county shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit

the urban growth that is projected to occur in the county or city for the succeeding twenty-year period, except for those urban growth areas contained totally within a national historical reserve. As part of this planning

process, each city within the county must include areas sufficient to accommodate the broad range of needs and uses that will accompany the projected urban growth including, as appropriate, medical, governmental,

institutional, commercial, service, retail, and other nonresidential uses.

 Each urban growth area shall permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space areas. In the case of urban growth areas contained totally within a national historical reserve, the city may restrict

densities, intensities, and forms of urban growth as determined to be necessary and appropriate to protect the physical, cultural, or historic integrity of the reserve. An urban growth area determination may include a

reasonable land market supply factor and shall permit a range of urban densities and uses. In determining this market factor, cities and counties may consider local circumstances. Cities and counties have discretion in

their comprehensive plans to make many choices about accommodating growth.

 Within one year of July 1, 1990, each county that as of June 1, 1991, was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, shall begin consulting with each city located within its boundaries and each city shall

propose the location of an urban growth area. Within sixty days of the date the county legislative authority of a county adopts its resolution of intention or of certification by the office of financial management, all other

counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall begin this consultation with each city located within its boundaries. The county shall attempt to reach agreement with each city on the location of an

urban growth area within which the city is located. If such an agreement is not reached with each city located within the urban growth area, the county shall justify in writing why it so designated the area an urban growth

area. A city may object formally with the department over the designation of the urban growth area within which it is located. Where appropriate, the department shall attempt to resolve the conflicts, including the use of

mediation services.

 (3) Urban growth should be located first in areas already characterized by urban growth that have adequate existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, second in areas already

characterized by urban growth that will be served adequately by a combination of both existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and services that are provided by either public or

private sources, and third in the remaining portions of the urban growth areas. Urban growth may also be located in designated new fully contained communities as defined by RCW 36.70A.350.

 (4) In general, cities are the units of local government most appropriate to provide urban governmental services. In general, it is not appropriate that urban governmental services be extended to or expanded in rural

areas except in those limited circumstances shown to be necessary to protect basic public health and safety and the environment and when such services are financially supportable at rural densities and do not permit

urban development.

 (5) On or before October 1, 1993, each county that was initially required to plan under RCW 36.70A.040(1) shall adopt development regulations designating interim urban growth areas under this chapter. Within three
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

years and three months of the date the county legislative authority of a county adopts its resolution of intention or of certification by the office of financial management, all other counties that are required or choose to plan

under RCW 36.70A.040 shall adopt development regulations designating interim urban growth areas under this chapter. Adoption of the interim urban growth areas may only occur after public notice; public hearing; and

compliance with the state environmental policy act, chapter 43.21C RCW, and under this section. Such action may be appealed to the growth management hearings board under RCW 36.70A.280. Final urban growth

areas shall be adopted at the time of comprehensive plan adoption under this chapter.

 (6) Each county shall include designations of urban growth areas in its comprehensive plan.

 (7) An urban growth area designated in accordance with this section may include within its boundaries urban service areas or potential annexation areas designated for specific cities or towns within the county.

 (8)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, the expansion of an urban growth area is prohibited into the one hundred year floodplain of any river or river segment that: (i) Is located west of the crest of the

Cascade mountains; and (ii) has a mean annual flow of one thousand or more cubic feet per second as determined by the department of ecology.

 (b) Subsection (8)(a) of this section does not apply to:

 (i) Urban growth areas that are fully contained within a floodplain and lack adjacent buildable areas outside the floodplain;

 (ii) Urban growth areas where expansions are precluded outside floodplains because:

 (A) Urban governmental services cannot be physically provided to serve areas outside the floodplain; or

 (B) Expansions outside the floodplain would require a river or estuary crossing to access the expansion; or

 (iii) Urban growth area expansions where:

 (A) Public facilities already exist within the floodplain and the expansion of an existing public facility is only possible on the land to be included in the urban growth area and located within the floodplain; or

 (B) Urban development already exists within a floodplain as of July 26, 2009, and is adjacent to, but outside of, the urban growth area, and the expansion of the urban growth area is necessary to include such urban

development within the urban growth area; or

 (C) The land is owned by a jurisdiction planning under this chapter or the rights to the development of the land have been permanently extinguished, and the following criteria are met:

 (I) The permissible use of the land is limited to one of the following: Outdoor recreation; environmentally beneficial projects, including but not limited to habitat enhancement or environmental restoration; storm water

facilities; flood control facilities; or underground conveyances; and

 (II) The development and use of such facilities or projects will not decrease flood storage, increase storm water runoff, discharge pollutants to fresh or salt waters during normal operations or floods, or increase hazards

to people and property.

 (c) For the purposes of this subsection (8), "one hundred year floodplain" means the same as "special flood hazard area" as set forth in WAC 173-158-040 as it exists on July 26, 2009.

[2010 c 211 § 1. Prior: 2009 c 342 § 1; 2009 c 121 § 1; 2004 c 206 § 1; 2003 c 299 § 5; 1997 c 429 § 24; 1995 c 400 § 2; 1994 c 249 § 27; 1993 sp.s. c 6 § 2; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 29; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 11.]

Notes:

 Effective date--Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Construction -- Application -- 1995 c 400: See note following RCW 36.70A.070.

 Effective date -- 1995 c 400: See note following RCW 36.70A.040.

 Severability -- Application -- 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310.

 Effective date -- 1993 sp.s. c 6: See note following RCW 36.70A.040.

36.70A.115

Comprehensive plans and development regulations must provide sufficient land capacity for development.

Counties and cities that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall ensure that, taken collectively, adoption of and amendments to their comprehensive plans and/or development regulations provide

sufficient capacity of land suitable for development within their jurisdictions to accommodate their allocated housing and employment growth, including the accommodation of, as appropriate, the medical, governmental,

educational, institutional, commercial, and industrial facilities related to such growth, as adopted in the applicable countywide planning policies and consistent with the twenty-year population forecast from the office of

financial management.

[2009 c 121 § 3; 2003 c 333 § 1.]

36.70A.120

Planning activities and capital budget decisions — Implementation in conformity with comprehensive plan.

Each county and city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall perform its activities and make capital budget decisions in conformity with its comprehensive plan.

[1993 sp.s. c 6 § 3; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 12.]

Notes:

 Effective date -- 1993 sp.s. c 6: See note following RCW 36.70A.040.

36.70A.130

Comprehensive plans — Review procedures and schedules — Amendments.

(1)(a) Each comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the county or city that adopted them. Except as otherwise provided, a county or city shall take

legislative action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive land use plan and development regulations to ensure the plan and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter according to the deadlines in

subsections (4) and (5) of this section.

 (b) Except as otherwise provided, a county or city not planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall take action to review and, if needed, revise its policies and development regulations regarding critical areas and natural

resource lands adopted according to this chapter to ensure these policies and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter according to the deadlines in subsections (4) and (5) of this section. Legislative action

means the adoption of a resolution or ordinance following notice and a public hearing indicating at a minimum, a finding that a review and evaluation has occurred and identifying the revisions made, or that a revision was

not needed and the reasons therefor.

 (c) The review and evaluation required by this subsection shall include, but is not limited to, consideration of critical area ordinances and, if planning under RCW 36.70A.040, an analysis of the population allocated to a

city or county from the most recent ten-year population forecast by the office of financial management.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (d) Any amendment of or revision to a comprehensive land use plan shall conform to this chapter. Any amendment of or revision to development regulations shall be consistent with and implement the comprehensive

plan.

 (2)(a) Each county and city shall establish and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program consistent with RCW 36.70A.035 and 36.70A.140 that identifies procedures and schedules whereby

updates, proposed amendments, or revisions of the comprehensive plan are considered by the governing body of the county or city no more frequently than once every year, except that, until December 31, 2015, the

program shall provide for consideration of amendments of an urban growth area in accordance with RCW 36.70A.1301 once every year. "Updates" means to review and revise, if needed, according to subsection (1) of this

section, and the deadlines in subsections (4) and (5) of this section or in accordance with the provisions of subsection (6) of this section. Amendments may be considered more frequently than once per year under the

following circumstances:

 (i) The initial adoption of a subarea plan. Subarea plans adopted under this subsection (2)(a)(i) must clarify, supplement, or implement jurisdiction-wide comprehensive plan policies, and may only be adopted if the

cumulative impacts of the proposed plan are addressed by appropriate environmental review under chapter 43.21C RCW;

 (ii) The development of an initial subarea plan for economic development located outside of the one hundred year floodplain in a county that has completed a state-funded pilot project that is based on watershed

characterization and local habitat assessment;

 (iii) The adoption or amendment of a shoreline master program under the procedures set forth in chapter 90.58 RCW;

 (iv) The amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a county or city budget; or

 (v) The adoption of comprehensive plan amendments necessary to enact a planned action under *RCW 43.21C.031(2), provided that amendments are considered in accordance with the public participation program

established by the county or city under this subsection (2)(a) and all persons who have requested notice of a comprehensive plan update are given notice of the amendments and an opportunity to comment.

 (b) Except as otherwise provided in (a) of this subsection, all proposals shall be considered by the governing body concurrently so the cumulative effect of the various proposals can be ascertained. However, after

appropriate public participation a county or city may adopt amendments or revisions to its comprehensive plan that conform with this chapter whenever an emergency exists or to resolve an appeal of a comprehensive plan

filed with the growth management hearings board or with the court.

 (3)(a) Each county that designates urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110 shall review, according to the schedules established in subsection (5) of this section, its designated urban growth area or areas, and the

densities permitted within both the incorporated and unincorporated portions of each urban growth area. In conjunction with this review by the county, each city located within an urban growth area shall review the densities

permitted within its boundaries, and the extent to which the urban growth occurring within the county has located within each city and the unincorporated portions of the urban growth areas.

 (b) The county comprehensive plan designating urban growth areas, and the densities permitted in the urban growth areas by the comprehensive plans of the county and each city located within the urban growth areas,

shall be revised to accommodate the urban growth projected to occur in the county for the succeeding twenty-year period. The review required by this subsection may be combined with the review and evaluation required

by RCW 36.70A.215.

 (4) Except as provided in subsection (6) of this section, counties and cities shall take action to review and, if needed, revise their comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure the plan and regulations

comply with the requirements of this chapter as follows:

 (a) On or before December 1, 2004, for Clallam, Clark, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Pierce, Snohomish, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;

 (b) On or before December 1, 2005, for Cowlitz, Island, Lewis, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, and Skamania counties and the cities within those counties;

 (c) On or before December 1, 2006, for Benton, Chelan, Douglas, Grant, Kittitas, Spokane, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties; and

 (d) On or before December 1, 2007, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Whitman counties

and the cities within those counties.

 (5) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (6) and (8) of this section, following the review of comprehensive plans and development regulations required by subsection (4) of this section, counties and cities shall

take action to review and, if needed, revise their comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure the plan and regulations comply with the requirements of this chapter as follows:

 (a) On or before June 30, 2015, and every eight years thereafter, for King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties and the cities within those counties;

 (b) On or before June 30, 2016, and every eight years thereafter, for Clallam, Clark, Island, Jefferson, Kitsap, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties;

 (c) On or before June 30, 2017, and every eight years thereafter, for Benton, Chelan, Cowlitz, Douglas, Kittitas, Lewis, Skamania, Spokane, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties; and

 (d) On or before June 30, 2018, and every eight years thereafter, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum,

Walla Walla, and Whitman counties and the cities within those counties.

 (6)(a) Nothing in this section precludes a county or city from conducting the review and evaluation required by this section before the deadlines established in subsections (4) and (5) of this section. Counties and cities

may begin this process early and may be eligible for grants from the department, subject to available funding, if they elect to do so.

 (b) A county that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (4)(b) through (d) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the thirty-six

months following the deadline established in subsection (4) of this section: The county has a population of less than fifty thousand and has had its population increase by no more than seventeen percent in the ten years

preceding the deadline established in subsection (4) of this section as of that date.

 (c) A city that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (4)(b) through (d) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the thirty-six months

following the deadline established in subsection (4) of this section: The city has a population of no more than five thousand and has had its population increase by the greater of either no more than one hundred persons or

no more than seventeen percent in the ten years preceding the deadline established in subsection (4) of this section as of that date.

 (d) A county or city that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (4)(d) of this section and that meets the criteria established in (b) or (c) of this subsection may comply with the requirements of subsection (4)(d)

of this section at any time within the thirty-six months after the extension provided in (b) or (c) of this subsection.

 (e) A county that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (5)(b) through (d) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the twenty-four

months following the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section: The county has a population of less than fifty thousand and has had its population increase by no more than seventeen percent in the ten years

preceding the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section as of that date.

 (f) A city that is subject to a deadline established in subsection (5)(b) through (d) of this section and meets the following criteria may comply with the requirements of this section at any time within the twenty-four months

following the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section: The city has a population of no more than five thousand and has had its population increase by the greater of either no more than one hundred persons or

no more than seventeen percent in the ten years preceding the deadline established in subsection (5) of this section as of that date.

 (g) State agencies are encouraged to provide technical assistance to the counties and cities in the review of critical area ordinances, comprehensive plans, and development regulations.

 (7)(a) The requirements imposed on counties and cities under this section shall be considered "requirements of this chapter" under the terms of RCW 36.70A.040(1). Only those counties and cities that meet the following

criteria may receive grants, loans, pledges, or financial guarantees under chapter 43.155 or 70.146 RCW:

 (i) Complying with the deadlines in this section;

 (ii) Demonstrating substantial progress towards compliance with the schedules in this section for development regulations that protect critical areas; or

 (iii) Complying with the extension provisions of subsection (6)(b), (c), or (d) of this section.

 (b) A county or city that is fewer than twelve months out of compliance with the schedules in this section for development regulations that protect critical areas is making substantial progress towards compliance. Only

those counties and cities in compliance with the schedules in this section may receive preference for grants or loans subject to the provisions of RCW 43.17.250.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (8)(a) Except as otherwise provided in (c) of this subsection, if a participating watershed is achieving benchmarks and goals for the protection of critical areas functions and values, the county is not required to update

development regulations to protect critical areas as they specifically apply to agricultural activities in that watershed.

 (b) A county that has made the election under RCW 36.70A.710(1) may only adopt or amend development regulations to protect critical areas as they specifically apply to agricultural activities in a participating

watershed if:

 (i) A work plan has been approved for that watershed in accordance with RCW 36.70A.725;

 (ii) The local watershed group for that watershed has requested the county to adopt or amend development regulations as part of a work plan developed under RCW 36.70A.720;

 (iii) The adoption or amendment of the development regulations is necessary to enable the county to respond to an order of the growth management hearings board or court;

 (iv) The adoption or amendment of development regulations is necessary to address a threat to human health or safety; or

 (v) Three or more years have elapsed since the receipt of funding.

 (c) Beginning ten years from the date of receipt of funding, a county that has made the election under RCW 36.70A.710(1) must review and, if necessary, revise development regulations to protect critical areas as they

specifically apply to agricultural activities in a participating watershed in accordance with the review and revision requirements and timeline in subsection (5) of this section. This subsection (8)(c) does not apply to a

participating watershed that has determined under RCW 36.70A.720(2)(c)(ii) that the watershed's goals and benchmarks for protection have been met.

[2012 c 191 § 1. Prior: 2011 c 360 § 16; 2011 c 353 § 2; prior: 2010 c 216 § 1; 2010 c 211 § 2; 2009 c 479 § 23; 2006 c 285 § 2; prior: 2005 c 423 § 6; 2005 c 294 § 2; 2002 c 320 § 1; 1997 c 429 § 10; 1995 c 347 § 106;

1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 13.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: The requirements for a planned action were moved by 2012 1st sp.s. c 1 from RCW 43.21C.031 to RCW 43.21C.440.

 Intent -- 2011 c 353: "It is the legislature's intent to provide local governments with more time to meet certain statutory requirements. Many cities and counties in Washington are facing revenue

shortfalls, higher expenses, and more difficulty with borrowing money as a result of the economic downturn. The effects of the economic downturn on the budgets of local governments will be felt

most deeply from 2010 to 2012. Local governments are facing the combined impact of decreased tax revenues, a falloff in state and federal aid, and increased demand for social services. With the

loss of tax revenue and state and federal aid, local governments are being forced to make significant cuts that will eliminate jobs, curtail essential services, and increase the number of people in

need. Additionally, local governments are struggling to comply with certain statutory requirements. Local governments want to comply with these statutory requirements, but with budget constraints,

they need more time to do so. The legislature does not intend to remove any existing statutory requirement, but rather modify the time under which a local government must meet certain statutory

requirements." [2011 c 353 § 1.]

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Effective date -- 2009 c 479: See note following RCW 2.56.030.

 Intent -- 2006 c 285: "There is a statewide interest in maintaining coordinated planning as called for in the legislative findings of the growth management act, RCW 36.70A.010. It is the intent of

the legislature that smaller, slower-growing counties and cities be provided with flexibility in meeting the requirements to review local plans and development regulations in RCW 36.70A.130, while

ensuring coordination and consistency with the plans of neighboring cities and counties." [2006 c 285 § 1.]

 Intent -- Effective date -- 2005 c 423: See notes following RCW 36.70A.030.

 Intent -- 2005 c 294: "The legislature recognizes the importance of appropriate and meaningful land use measures and that such measures are critical to preserving and fostering the quality of life

enjoyed by Washingtonians. The legislature recognizes also that the growth management act requires counties and cities to review and, if needed, revise their comprehensive plans and development

regulations on a cyclical basis. These requirements, which often require significant compliance efforts by local governments are, in part, an acknowledgment of the continual changes that occur within

the state, and the need to ensure that land use measures reflect the collective wishes of its citizenry.

 The legislature acknowledges that only those jurisdictions in compliance with the review and revision schedules of the growth management act are eligible to receive funds from the public works

assistance and water quality accounts in the state treasury. The legislature further recognizes that some jurisdictions that are not yet in compliance with these review and revision schedules have

demonstrated substantial progress towards compliance.

 The legislature, therefore, intends to grant jurisdictions that are not in compliance with requirements for development regulations that protect critical areas, but are demonstrating substantial

progress towards compliance with these requirements, twelve months of additional eligibility to receive grants, loans, pledges, or financial guarantees from the public works assistance and water

quality accounts in the state treasury. The legislature intends to specify, however, that only counties and cities in compliance with the review and revision schedules of the growth management act

may receive preference for financial assistance from these accounts." [2005 c 294 § 1.]

 Effective date -- 2005 c 294: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,

and takes effect immediately [May 5, 2005]." [2005 c 294 § 3.]

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

Definitions: See RCW 36.70A.703.

RCW 36.70A.130(2) does not apply to master planned locations in industrial land banks: RCW 36.70A.367(2)(c).

36.70A.1301

Request to amend urban growth area — Timing — Criteria. (Expires December 31, 2015.)

(1) The legislative authority of a city planning under RCW 36.70A.040 may request, as part of the county's annual comprehensive plan amendment process, that the applicable county legislative authority amend the urban

growth area within which the city is located. A request must meet the county's application deadline for that year's comprehensive plan amendment process. A determination to honor, modify, or reject a request under this

section must be issued by the county, as part of the county's annual comprehensive plan amendment process.

 (2) Urban growth area amendment requests under this subsection:

 (a) May only occur in counties located east of the crest of the Cascade mountain range that have more than one hundred thousand and fewer than two hundred thousand residents;

 (b) Must be for the purpose of increasing the amount of territory within the amended urban growth area that is zoned for industrial purposes and the additional land is needed to meet the city's and county's documented

needs for additional industrial land to serve their planned population growth;

 (c) May not increase the amount of territory within the amended urban growth area by an amount exceeding seven percent of the total area within the requesting city. Land area determinations under this subsection

(2)(c) must be made on a per occurrence, noncumulative basis;

 (d) Must be preceded by a completed development proposal and phased master plan for the area to which the amendment applies and a capital facilities plan with identified funding sources to provide the public facilities

and services needed to serve the area; and

 (e) Are null and void if the applicable development proposal has not been wholly or partially implemented within five years of the amendment, or if the area to which the amendment applies has not been annexed within

five years of the amendment.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (3) Nothing in this section limits or otherwise modifies the authority of counties and cities to enter into interlocal agreements under chapter 39.34 RCW for planning costs incurred by a county in accordance with a

request under this section.

 (4) This section expires December 31, 2015.

[2012 c 191 § 2.]

36.70A.131

Mineral resource lands — Review of related designations and development regulations.

As part of the review required by RCW 36.70A.130(1), a county or city shall review its mineral resource lands designations adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.170 and mineral resource lands development regulations

adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040 and 36.70A.060. In its review, the county or city shall take into consideration:

 (1) New information made available since the adoption or last review of its designations or development regulations, including data available from the department of natural resources relating to mineral resource

deposits; and

 (2) New or modified model development regulations for mineral resource lands prepared by the department of natural resources, the *department of community, trade, and economic development, or the Washington

state association of counties.

[1998 c 286 § 7.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: The "department of community, trade, and economic development" was renamed the "department of commerce" by 2009 c 565.

36.70A.140

Comprehensive plans — Ensure public participation.

Each county and city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall establish and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program identifying procedures providing for early and continuous

public participation in the development and amendment of comprehensive land use plans and development regulations implementing such plans. The procedures shall provide for broad dissemination of proposals and

alternatives, opportunity for written comments, public meetings after effective notice, provision for open discussion, communication programs, information services, and consideration of and response to public comments. In

enacting legislation in response to the board's decision pursuant to RCW 36.70A.300 declaring part or all of a comprehensive plan or development regulation invalid, the county or city shall provide for public participation

that is appropriate and effective under the circumstances presented by the board's order. Errors in exact compliance with the established program and procedures shall not render the comprehensive land use plan or

development regulations invalid if the spirit of the program and procedures is observed.

[1995 c 347 § 107; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 14.]

Notes:

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

36.70A.150

Identification of lands useful for public purposes.

Each county and city that is required or chooses to prepare a comprehensive land use plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall identify lands useful for public purposes such as utility corridors, transportation corridors, landfills,

sewage treatment facilities, storm water management facilities, recreation, schools, and other public uses. The county shall work with the state and the cities within its borders to identify areas of shared need for public

facilities. The jurisdictions within the county shall prepare a prioritized list of lands necessary for the identified public uses including an estimated date by which the acquisition will be needed.

 The respective capital acquisition budgets for each jurisdiction shall reflect the jointly agreed upon priorities and time schedule.

[1991 c 322 § 23; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 15.]

Notes:

 Findings -- Intent -- 1991 c 322: See notes following RCW 86.12.200.

36.70A.160

Identification of open space corridors — Purchase authorized.

Each county and city that is required or chooses to prepare a comprehensive land use plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall identify open space corridors within and between urban growth areas. They shall include lands

useful for recreation, wildlife habitat, trails, and connection of critical areas as defined in RCW 36.70A.030. Identification of a corridor under this section by a county or city shall not restrict the use or management of lands

within the corridor for agricultural or forest purposes. Restrictions on the use or management of such lands for agricultural or forest purposes imposed after identification solely to maintain or enhance the value of such lands

as a corridor may occur only if the county or city acquires sufficient interest to prevent development of the lands or to control the resource development of the lands. The requirement for acquisition of sufficient interest does

not include those corridors regulated by the interstate commerce commission, under provisions of 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1247(d), 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1248, or 43 U.S.C. Sec. 912. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to alter

the authority of the state, or a county or city, to regulate land use activities.

 The city or county may acquire by donation or purchase the fee simple or lesser interests in these open space corridors using funds authorized by RCW 84.34.230 or other sources.

[1992 c 227 § 1; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 16.]

36.70A.165

Property designated as greenbelt or open space — Not subject to adverse possession.

The legislature recognizes that the preservation of urban greenbelts is an integral part of comprehensive growth management in Washington. The legislature further recognizes that certain greenbelts are subject to adverse

possession action which, if carried out, threaten the comprehensive nature of this chapter. Therefore, a party shall not acquire by adverse possession property that is designated as a plat greenbelt or open space area or

that is dedicated as open space to a public agency or to a bona fide homeowner's association.

[1997 c 429 § 41.]

Notes:

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

36.70A.170
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

Natural resource lands and critical areas — Designations.

(1) On or before September 1, 1991, each county, and each city, shall designate where appropriate:

 (a) Agricultural lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and that have long-term significance for the commercial production of food or other agricultural products;

 (b) Forest lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and that have long-term significance for the commercial production of timber;

 (c) Mineral resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and that have long-term significance for the extraction of minerals; and

 (d) Critical areas.

 (2) In making the designations required by this section, counties and cities shall consider the guidelines established pursuant to RCW 36.70A.050.

[1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 17.]

36.70A.171

Playing fields — Compliance with this chapter.

In accordance with RCW 36.70A.030, 36.70A.060, *36.70A.1701, and 36.70A.130, playing fields and supporting facilities existing before July 1, 2004, on designated recreational lands shall be considered in compliance

with the requirements of this chapter.

[2005 c 423 § 5.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: RCW 36.70A.1701 expired June 30, 2006.

 Intent -- Effective date -- 2005 c 423: See notes following RCW 36.70A.030.

36.70A.172

Critical areas — Designation and protection — Best available science to be used.

(1) In designating and protecting critical areas under this chapter, counties and cities shall include the best available science in developing policies and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical

areas. In addition, counties and cities shall give special consideration to conservation or protection measures necessary to preserve or enhance anadromous fisheries.

 (2) If it determines that advice from scientific or other experts is necessary or will be of substantial assistance in reaching its decision, the growth management hearings board may retain scientific or other expert advice

to assist in reviewing a petition under RCW 36.70A.290 that involves critical areas.

[2010 c 211 § 3; 1995 c 347 § 105.]

Notes:

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

36.70A.175

Wetlands to be delineated in accordance with manual.

Wetlands regulated under development regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter shall be delineated in accordance with the manual adopted by the department pursuant to RCW 90.58.380.

[1995 c 382 § 12.]

36.70A.177

Agricultural lands — Innovative zoning techniques — Accessory uses.

(1) A county or a city may use a variety of innovative zoning techniques in areas designated as agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance under RCW 36.70A.170. The innovative zoning techniques should be

designed to conserve agricultural lands and encourage the agricultural economy. Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, a county or city should encourage nonagricultural uses to be limited to lands with poor

soils or otherwise not suitable for agricultural purposes.

 (2) Innovative zoning techniques a county or city may consider include, but are not limited to:

 (a) Agricultural zoning, which limits the density of development and restricts or prohibits nonfarm uses of agricultural land and may allow accessory uses, including nonagricultural accessory uses and activities, that

support, promote, or sustain agricultural operations and production, as provided in subsection (3) of this section;

 (b) Cluster zoning, which allows new development on one portion of the land, leaving the remainder in agricultural or open space uses;

 (c) Large lot zoning, which establishes as a minimum lot size the amount of land necessary to achieve a successful farming practice;

 (d) Quarter/quarter zoning, which permits one residential dwelling on a one-acre minimum lot for each one-sixteenth of a section of land; and

 (e) Sliding scale zoning, which allows the number of lots for single-family residential purposes with a minimum lot size of one acre to increase inversely as the size of the total acreage increases.

 (3) Accessory uses allowed under subsection (2)(a) of this section shall comply with the following:

 (a) Accessory uses shall be located, designed, and operated so as to not interfere with, and to support the continuation of, the overall agricultural use of the property and neighboring properties, and shall comply with the

requirements of this chapter;

 (b) Accessory uses may include:

 (i) Agricultural accessory uses and activities, including but not limited to the storage, distribution, and marketing of regional agricultural products from one or more producers, agriculturally related experiences, or the

production, marketing, and distribution of value-added agricultural products, including support services that facilitate these activities; and

 (ii) Nonagricultural accessory uses and activities as long as they are consistent with the size, scale, and intensity of the existing agricultural use of the property and the existing buildings on the site. Nonagricultural

accessory uses and activities, including new buildings, parking, or supportive uses, shall not be located outside the general area already developed for buildings and residential uses and shall not otherwise convert more

than one acre of agricultural land to nonagricultural uses; and
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (c) Counties and cities have the authority to limit or exclude accessory uses otherwise authorized in this subsection (3) in areas designated as agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance.

 (4) This section shall not be interpreted to limit agricultural production on designated agricultural lands.

[2006 c 147 § 1; 2004 c 207 § 1; 1997 c 429 § 23.]

Notes:

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

36.70A.180

Chapter implementation — Intent.

It is the intent of the legislature that counties and cities required to adopt a comprehensive plan under RCW 36.70A.040(1) begin implementing this chapter on or before July 1, 1990, including but not limited to: (1)

Inventorying, designating, and conserving agricultural, forest, and mineral resource lands, and critical areas; and (2) considering the modification or adoption of comprehensive land use plans and development regulations

implementing the comprehensive land use plans. It is also the intent of the legislature that funds be made available to counties and cities beginning July 1, 1990, to assist them in meeting the requirements of this chapter.

[2012 1st sp.s. c 5 § 3; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 19.]

36.70A.190

Technical assistance, procedural criteria, grants, and mediation services.

(1) The department shall establish a program of technical and financial assistance and incentives to counties and cities to encourage and facilitate the adoption and implementation of comprehensive plans and

development regulations throughout the state.

 (2) The department shall develop a priority list and establish funding levels for planning and technical assistance grants both for counties and cities that plan under RCW 36.70A.040. Priority for assistance shall be based

on a county's or city's population growth rates, commercial and industrial development rates, the existence and quality of a comprehensive plan and development regulations, and other relevant factors.

 (3) The department shall develop and administer a grant program to provide direct financial assistance to counties and cities for the preparation of comprehensive plans under this chapter. The department may establish

provisions for county and city matching funds to conduct activities under this subsection. Grants may be expended for any purpose directly related to the preparation of a county or city comprehensive plan as the county or

city and the department may agree, including, without limitation, the conducting of surveys, inventories and other data gathering and management activities, the retention of planning consultants, contracts with regional

councils for planning and related services, and other related purposes.

 (4) The department shall establish a program of technical assistance:

 (a) Utilizing department staff, the staff of other state agencies, and the technical resources of counties and cities to help in the development of comprehensive plans required under this chapter. The technical assistance

may include, but not be limited to, model land use ordinances, regional education and training programs, and information for local and regional inventories; and

 (b) Adopting by rule procedural criteria to assist counties and cities in adopting comprehensive plans and development regulations that meet the goals and requirements of this chapter. These criteria shall reflect regional

and local variations and the diversity that exists among different counties and cities that plan under this chapter.

 (5) The department shall provide mediation services to resolve disputes between counties and cities regarding, among other things, coordination of regional issues and designation of urban growth areas.

 (6) The department shall provide planning grants to enhance citizen participation under RCW 36.70A.140.

[1991 sp.s. c 32 § 3; 1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 20.]

36.70A.200

Siting of essential public facilities — Limitation on liability.

(1) The comprehensive plan of each county and city that is planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall include a process for identifying and siting essential public facilities. Essential public facilities include those facilities that

are typically difficult to site, such as airports, state education facilities and state or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.06.140, regional transit authority facilities as defined in RCW 81.112.020, state and

local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and inpatient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW

71.09.020.

 (2) Each county and city planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall, not later than September 1, 2002, establish a process, or amend its existing process, for identifying and siting essential public facilities and adopt or

amend its development regulations as necessary to provide for the siting of secure community transition facilities consistent with statutory requirements applicable to these facilities.

 (3) Any city or county not planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall, not later than September 1, 2002, establish a process for siting secure community transition facilities and adopt or amend its development regulations as

necessary to provide for the siting of such facilities consistent with statutory requirements applicable to these facilities.

 (4) The office of financial management shall maintain a list of those essential state public facilities that are required or likely to be built within the next six years. The office of financial management may at any time add

facilities to the list.

 (5) No local comprehensive plan or development regulation may preclude the siting of essential public facilities.

 (6) No person may bring a cause of action for civil damages based on the good faith actions of any county or city to provide for the siting of secure community transition facilities in accordance with this section and with

the requirements of chapter 12, Laws of 2001 2nd sp. sess. For purposes of this subsection, "person" includes, but is not limited to, any individual, agency as defined in RCW 42.17A.005, corporation, partnership,

association, and limited liability entity.

 (7) Counties or cities siting facilities pursuant to subsection (2) or (3) of this section shall comply with RCW 71.09.341.

 (8) The failure of a county or city to act by the deadlines established in subsections (2) and (3) of this section is not:

 (a) A condition that would disqualify the county or city for grants, loans, or pledges under RCW 43.155.070 or 70.146.070;

 (b) A consideration for grants or loans provided under RCW 43.17.250(2); or

 (c) A basis for any petition under RCW 36.70A.280 or for any private cause of action.

[2011 c 60 § 17; 2010 c 62 § 1; 2002 c 68 § 2; 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12 § 205; 1998 c 171 § 3; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 1.]

Notes:

 Effective date -- 2011 c 60: See RCW 42.17A.919.

 Purpose -- 2002 c 68: "The purpose of this act is to:

 (1) Enable the legislature to act upon the recommendations of the joint select committee on the equitable distribution of secure community transition facilities established in section 225, chapter 12,

Laws of 2001 2nd sp. sess.; and
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (2) Harmonize the preemption provisions in RCW 71.09.250 with the preemption provisions applying to future secure community transition facilities to reflect the joint select committee's

recommendation that the preemption granted for future secure community transition facilities be the same throughout the state." [2002 c 68 § 1.]

 Severability -- 2002 c 68: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or

circumstances is not affected." [2002 c 68 § 19.]

 Effective date -- 2002 c 68: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and

takes effect immediately [March 21, 2002]." [2002 c 68 § 20.]

 Intent -- Severability -- Effective dates -- 2001 2nd sp.s. c 12: See notes following RCW 71.09.250.

36.70A.210

Countywide planning policies.

(1) The legislature recognizes that counties are regional governments within their boundaries, and cities are primary providers of urban governmental services within urban growth areas. For the purposes of this section, a

"countywide planning policy" is a written policy statement or statements used solely for establishing a countywide framework from which county and city comprehensive plans are developed and adopted pursuant to this

chapter. This framework shall ensure that city and county comprehensive plans are consistent as required in RCW 36.70A.100. Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter the land-use powers of cities.

 (2) The legislative authority of a county that plans under RCW 36.70A.040 shall adopt a countywide planning policy in cooperation with the cities located in whole or in part within the county as follows:

 (a) No later than sixty calendar days from July 16, 1991, the legislative authority of each county that as of June 1, 1991, was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 shall convene a meeting with

representatives of each city located within the county for the purpose of establishing a collaborative process that will provide a framework for the adoption of a countywide planning policy. In other counties that are required

or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, this meeting shall be convened no later than sixty days after the date the county adopts its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management.

 (b) The process and framework for adoption of a countywide planning policy specified in (a) of this subsection shall determine the manner in which the county and the cities agree to all procedures and provisions

including but not limited to desired planning policies, deadlines, ratification of final agreements and demonstration thereof, and financing, if any, of all activities associated therewith.

 (c) If a county fails for any reason to convene a meeting with representatives of cities as required in (a) of this subsection, the governor may immediately impose any appropriate sanction or sanctions on the county from

those specified under RCW 36.70A.340.

 (d) If there is no agreement by October 1, 1991, in a county that was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 as of June 1, 1991, or if there is no agreement within one hundred twenty days of the date the

county adopted its resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management in any other county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, the governor shall first inquire of the

jurisdictions as to the reason or reasons for failure to reach an agreement. If the governor deems it appropriate, the governor may immediately request the assistance of the *department of community, trade, and economic

development to mediate any disputes that preclude agreement. If mediation is unsuccessful in resolving all disputes that will lead to agreement, the governor may impose appropriate sanctions from those specified under

RCW 36.70A.340 on the county, city, or cities for failure to reach an agreement as provided in this section. The governor shall specify the reason or reasons for the imposition of any sanction.

 (e) No later than July 1, 1992, the legislative authority of each county that was required or chose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 as of June 1, 1991, or no later than fourteen months after the date the county adopted its

resolution of intention or was certified by the office of financial management the county legislative authority of any other county that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, shall adopt a countywide planning

policy according to the process provided under this section and that is consistent with the agreement pursuant to (b) of this subsection, and after holding a public hearing or hearings on the proposed countywide planning

policy.

 (3) A countywide planning policy shall at a minimum, address the following:

 (a) Policies to implement RCW 36.70A.110;

 (b) Policies for promotion of contiguous and orderly development and provision of urban services to such development;

 (c) Policies for siting public capital facilities of a countywide or statewide nature, including transportation facilities of statewide significance as defined in RCW 47.06.140;

 (d) Policies for countywide transportation facilities and strategies;

 (e) Policies that consider the need for affordable housing, such as housing for all economic segments of the population and parameters for its distribution;

 (f) Policies for joint county and city planning within urban growth areas;

 (g) Policies for countywide economic development and employment, which must include consideration of the future development of commercial and industrial facilities; and

 (h) An analysis of the fiscal impact.

 (4) Federal agencies and Indian tribes may participate in and cooperate with the countywide planning policy adoption process. Adopted countywide planning policies shall be adhered to by state agencies.

 (5) Failure to adopt a countywide planning policy that meets the requirements of this section may result in the imposition of a sanction or sanctions on a county or city within the county, as specified in RCW 36.70A.340.

In imposing a sanction or sanctions, the governor shall specify the reasons for failure to adopt a countywide planning policy in order that any imposed sanction or sanctions are fairly and equitably related to the failure to

adopt a countywide planning policy.

 (6) Cities and the governor may appeal an adopted countywide planning policy to the growth management hearings board within sixty days of the adoption of the countywide planning policy.

 (7) Multicounty planning policies shall be adopted by two or more counties, each with a population of four hundred fifty thousand or more, with contiguous urban areas and may be adopted by other counties, according

to the process established under this section or other processes agreed to among the counties and cities within the affected counties throughout the multicounty region.

[2009 c 121 § 2; 1998 c 171 § 4; 1994 c 249 § 28; 1993 sp.s. c 6 § 4; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 2.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: The "department of community, trade, and economic development" was renamed the "department of commerce" by 2009 c 565.

 Severability -- Application -- 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310.

 Effective date -- 1993 sp.s. c 6: See note following RCW 36.70A.040.

36.70A.215

Review and evaluation program.

(1) Subject to the limitations in subsection (7) of this section, a county shall adopt, in consultation with its cities, countywide planning policies to establish a review and evaluation program. This program shall be in addition

to the requirements of RCW 36.70A.110, 36.70A.130, and 36.70A.210. In developing and implementing the review and evaluation program required by this section, the county and its cities shall consider information from

other appropriate jurisdictions and sources. The purpose of the review and evaluation program shall be to:

 (a) Determine whether a county and its cities are achieving urban densities within urban growth areas by comparing growth and development assumptions, targets, and objectives contained in the countywide planning

policies and the county and city comprehensive plans with actual growth and development that has occurred in the county and its cities; and

 (b) Identify reasonable measures, other than adjusting urban growth areas, that will be taken to comply with the requirements of this chapter.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (2) The review and evaluation program shall:

 (a) Encompass land uses and activities both within and outside of urban growth areas and provide for annual collection of data on urban and rural land uses, development, critical areas, and capital facilities to the extent

necessary to determine the quantity and type of land suitable for development, both for residential and employment-based activities;

 (b) Provide for evaluation of the data collected under (a) of this subsection as provided in subsection (3) of this section. The evaluation shall be completed no later than one year prior to the deadline for review and, if

necessary, update of comprehensive plans and development regulations as required by RCW 36.70A.130. The county and its cities may establish in the countywide planning policies indicators, benchmarks, and other

similar criteria to use in conducting the evaluation;

 (c) Provide for methods to resolve disputes among jurisdictions relating to the countywide planning policies required by this section and procedures to resolve inconsistencies in collection and analysis of data; and

 (d) Provide for the amendment of the countywide policies and county and city comprehensive plans as needed to remedy an inconsistency identified through the evaluation required by this section, or to bring these

policies into compliance with the requirements of this chapter.

 (3) At a minimum, the evaluation component of the program required by subsection (1) of this section shall:

 (a) Determine whether there is sufficient suitable land to accommodate the countywide population projection established for the county pursuant to RCW 43.62.035 and the subsequent population allocations within the

county and between the county and its cities and the requirements of RCW 36.70A.110;

 (b) Determine the actual density of housing that has been constructed and the actual amount of land developed for commercial and industrial uses within the urban growth area since the adoption of a comprehensive

plan under this chapter or since the last periodic evaluation as required by subsection (1) of this section; and

 (c) Based on the actual density of development as determined under (b) of this subsection, review commercial, industrial, and housing needs by type and density range to determine the amount of land needed for

commercial, industrial, and housing for the remaining portion of the twenty-year planning period used in the most recently adopted comprehensive plan.

 (4) If the evaluation required by subsection (3) of this section demonstrates an inconsistency between what has occurred since the adoption of the countywide planning policies and the county and city comprehensive

plans and development regulations and what was envisioned in those policies and plans and the planning goals and the requirements of this chapter, as the inconsistency relates to the evaluation factors specified in

subsection (3) of this section, the county and its cities shall adopt and implement measures that are reasonably likely to increase consistency during the subsequent five-year period. If necessary, a county, in consultation

with its cities as required by RCW 36.70A.210, shall adopt amendments to countywide planning policies to increase consistency. The county and its cities shall annually monitor the measures adopted under this subsection

to determine their effect and may revise or rescind them as appropriate.

 (5)(a) Not later than July 1, 1998, the department shall prepare a list of methods used by counties and cities in carrying out the types of activities required by this section. The department shall provide this information

and appropriate technical assistance to counties and cities required to or choosing to comply with the provisions of this section.

 (b) By December 31, 2007, the department shall submit to the appropriate committees of the legislature a report analyzing the effectiveness of the activities described in this section in achieving the goals envisioned by

the countywide planning policies and the comprehensive plans and development regulations of the counties and cities.

 (6) From funds appropriated by the legislature for this purpose, the department shall provide grants to counties, cities, and regional planning organizations required under subsection (7) of this section to conduct the

review and perform the evaluation required by this section.

 (7) The provisions of this section shall apply to counties, and the cities within those counties, that were greater than one hundred fifty thousand in population in 1995 as determined by office of financial management

population estimates and that are located west of the crest of the Cascade mountain range. Any other county planning under RCW 36.70A.040 may carry out the review, evaluation, and amendment programs and

procedures as provided in this section.

[2011 c 353 § 3; 1997 c 429 § 25.]

Notes:

 Intent -- 2011 c 353: See note following RCW 36.70A.130.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

36.70A.250

Growth management hearings board — Creation — Members.

(1) A growth management hearings board for the state of Washington is created. The board shall consist of seven members qualified by experience or training in matters pertaining to land use law or land use planning and

who have experience in the practical application of those matters. All seven board members shall be appointed by the governor, two each residing respectively in the central Puget Sound, eastern Washington, and western

Washington regions, plus one board member residing within the state of Washington. At least three members of the board shall be admitted to practice law in this state, one each residing respectively in the central Puget

Sound, eastern Washington, and western Washington regions. At least three members of the board shall have been a city or county elected official, one each residing respectively in the central Puget Sound, eastern

Washington, and western Washington regions. After expiration of the terms of board members on the previously existing three growth management hearings boards, no more than four members of the seven-member

board may be members of the same major political party. No more than two members at the time of their appointment or during their term may reside in the same county.

 (2) Each member of the board shall be appointed for a term of six years. A vacancy shall be filled by appointment by the governor for the unexpired portion of the term in which the vacancy occurs. Members of the

previously existing three growth management hearings boards appointed before July 1, 2010, shall complete their staggered, six-year terms as members of the growth management hearings board created under

subsection (1) of this section. The reduction from nine board members on the previously existing three growth management hearings boards to seven total members on the growth management hearings board shall be

made through attrition, voluntary resignation, or retirement.

[2010 c 211 § 4; 1994 c 249 § 29; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 5.]

Notes:

 Effective date -- 2010 c 211: "This act takes effect July 1, 2010." [2010 c 211 § 18.]

 Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: "(1) The three growth management hearings boards are abolished and their powers, duties, and functions are transferred to the growth

management hearings board.

 (2) All reports, documents, surveys, books, records, files, papers, or written material in the possession of the three growth management hearings boards must be delivered to the custody of the

growth management hearings board. All office furnishings, office equipment, motor vehicles, and other tangible property in the possession of the three growth management hearings boards must be

made available to the growth management hearings board.

 (3) All funds, credits, or other assets held by the three growth management hearings boards must, on July 1, 2010, be transferred to the growth management hearings board. Any appropriations

made to the three growth management hearings boards must, on July 1, 2010, be transferred and credited to the growth management hearings board. If any question arises as to the transfer of any

personnel, funds, books, documents, records, papers, files, equipment, or other tangible property used or held in the exercise of the powers and the performance of the duties and functions

transferred, the director of financial management shall make a determination as to the proper allocation and certify the same to the state agencies concerned.

 (4) All employees of the three growth management hearings boards are transferred to the growth management hearings board. All employees classified under chapter 41.06 RCW, the state civil

service law, are assigned to the growth management hearings board to perform their usual duties upon the same terms as formerly, without any loss of rights, subject to any action that may be

appropriate thereafter in accordance with the laws and rules governing state civil service.

 (5) This section may not be construed to alter any existing collective bargaining unit or the provisions of any existing collective bargaining agreement until the agreement has expired or until the

bargaining unit has been modified by action of the public employment relations commission as provided by law.

 (6) All rules and pending business before the three growth management hearings boards must be continued and acted upon by the growth management hearings board. All existing contracts and
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

obligations remain in full force and must be performed by the growth management hearings board.

 (7) The transfer of the powers, duties, functions, and personnel of the three growth management hearings boards to the growth management hearings board does not affect the validity of any act

performed before July 1, 2010.

 (8) All cases decided and all orders previously issued by the three growth management hearings boards remain in full force and effect and are not affected by this act." [2010 c 211 § 17.]

 Severability -- Application -- 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310.

36.70A.252

Growth management hearings board — Consolidation into environmental and land use hearings office.

(1) On July 1, 2011, the growth management hearings board is administratively consolidated into the environmental and land use hearings office created in RCW 43.21B.005.

 (2) Not later than July 1, 2012, the growth management hearings board consists of seven members qualified by experience or training in matters pertaining to land use law or land use planning, except that the governor

may reduce the board to six members if warranted by the board's caseload. All board members must be appointed by the governor, two each residing respectively in the central Puget Sound, eastern Washington, and

western Washington regions and shall continue to meet the qualifications set out in *RCW 36.70A.260. The reduction from seven board members to six board members must be made through attrition, voluntary

resignation, or retirement.

[2010 c 210 § 15.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: RCW 36.70A.260 was amended by 2010 c 211 § 5, eliminating the reference to board member qualifications. 2010 c 211 § 4 added board member qualifications to RCW

36.70A.250.

 Intent -- Effective dates -- Application -- Pending cases and rules -- 2010 c 210: See notes following RCW 43.21B.001.

36.70A.260

Growth management hearings board — Regional panels.

(1) Each petition for review that is filed with the growth management hearings board shall be heard and decided by a regional panel of growth management hearings board members. Regional panels shall be constituted

as follows:

 (a) Central Puget Sound region. A three-member central Puget Sound panel shall be selected to hear matters pertaining to cities and counties located within the region comprised of King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap

counties.

 (b) Eastern Washington region. A three-member eastern Washington panel shall be selected to hear matters pertaining to cities and counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 and are located

east of the crest of the Cascade mountains.

 (c) Western Washington region. A three-member western Washington panel shall be selected to hear matters pertaining to cities and counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, are located

west of the crest of the Cascade mountains, and are not included in the central Puget Sound region. Skamania county, if it is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040, may elect to be included within either the

western Washington region or the eastern Washington region.

 (2)(a) Each regional panel selected to hear and decide cases shall consist of three board members, at least a majority of whom shall reside within the region in which the case arose, unless such members cannot sit on

a particular case because of recusal or disqualification, or unless the board administrative officer determines that there is an emergency including, but not limited to, the unavailability of a board member due to illness,

absence, vacancy, or significant workload imbalance. The presiding officer of each case shall reside within the region in which the case arose, unless the board administrative officer determines that there is an emergency.

 (b) Except as provided otherwise in this subsection (2)(b), each regional panel must: (i) Include one member admitted to practice law in this state; (ii) include one member who has been a city or county elected official;

and (iii) reflect the political composition of the board. The requirements of this subsection (2)(b) may be waived by the board administrative officer due to member unavailability, significant workload imbalances, or other

reasons.

[2010 c 211 § 5; 1994 c 249 § 30; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 6.]

Notes:

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Severability -- Application -- 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310.

36.70A.270

Growth management hearings board — Conduct, procedure, and compensation.

The growth management hearings board shall be governed by the following rules on conduct and procedure:

 (1) Any board member may be removed for inefficiency, malfeasance, and misfeasance in office, under specific written charges filed by the governor. The governor shall transmit such written charges to the member

accused and the chief justice of the supreme court. The chief justice shall thereupon designate a tribunal composed of three judges of the superior court to hear and adjudicate the charges. Removal of any member of the

board by the tribunal shall disqualify such member for reappointment.

 (2) Each board member shall receive reimbursement for travel expenses incurred in the discharge of his or her duties in accordance with RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060. Each member shall receive an annual salary to

be determined by the governor pursuant to RCW 43.03.040. The principal office of the board shall be located in Olympia.

 (3) Each board member shall not: (a) Be a candidate for or hold any other public office or trust; (b) engage in any occupation or business interfering with or inconsistent with his or her duty as a board member; and (c) for

a period of one year after the termination of his or her board membership, act in a representative capacity before the board on any matter.

 (4) A majority of the board shall constitute a quorum for adopting rules necessary for the conduct of its powers and duties or transacting other official business, and may act even though one position of the board is

vacant. One or more members may hold hearings and take testimony to be reported for action by the board when authorized by rule or order of the board. The board shall perform all the powers and duties specified in this

chapter or as otherwise provided by law.

 (5) The board may use one or more hearing examiners to assist the board in its hearing function, to make conclusions of law and findings of fact and, if requested by the board, to make recommendations to the board

for decisions in cases before the board. Such hearing examiners must have demonstrated knowledge of land use planning and law. The board shall specify in its rules of practice and procedure, as required by subsection

(7) of this section, the procedure and criteria to be employed for designating hearing examiners as a presiding officer. Hearing examiners used by the board shall meet the requirements of subsection (3) of this section. The

findings and conclusions of the hearing examiner shall not become final until they have been formally approved by the board. This authorization to use hearing examiners does not waive the requirement of RCW

36.70A.300 that final orders be issued within one hundred eighty days of board receipt of a petition.

 (6) The board shall make findings of fact and prepare a written decision in each case decided by it, and such findings and decision shall be effective upon being signed by two or more members of the regional panel

deciding the particular case and upon being filed at the board's principal office, and shall be open for public inspection at all reasonable times.

 (7) All proceedings before the board, any of its members, or a hearing examiner appointed by the board shall be conducted in accordance with such administrative rules of practice and procedure as the board

prescribes. The board shall develop and adopt rules of practice and procedure, including rules regarding expeditious and summary disposition of appeals and the assignment of cases to regional panels. The board shall
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

publish such rules and decisions it renders and arrange for the reasonable distribution of the rules and decisions. Except as it conflicts with specific provisions of this chapter, the administrative procedure act, chapter

34.05 RCW, and specifically including the provisions of RCW 34.05.455 governing ex parte communications, shall govern the practice and procedure of the board.

 (8) A board member or hearing examiner is subject to disqualification under chapter 34.05 RCW. The rules of practice of the board shall establish procedures by which a party to a hearing conducted before the board

may file with the board a motion to disqualify, with supporting affidavit, against a board member or hearing examiner assigned to preside at the hearing.

 (9) All members of the board shall meet on at least an annual basis with the objective of sharing information that promotes the goals and purposes of this chapter.

 (10) The board shall annually elect one of its members to be the board administrative officer. The duties and responsibilities of the administrative officer include handling day-to-day administrative, budget, and personnel

matters on behalf of the board, together with making case assignments to board members in accordance with the board's rules of procedure in order to achieve a fair and balanced workload among all board members. The

administrative officer of the board may carry a reduced caseload to allow time for performing the administrative work functions.

[2010 c 211 § 6; 2010 c 210 § 16; 1997 c 429 § 11; 1996 c 325 § 1; 1994 c 257 § 1; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 7.]

Notes:

 Reviser's note: This section was amended by 2010 c 210 § 16 and by 2010 c 211 § 6, each without reference to the other. Both amendments are incorporated in the publication of this section

under RCW 1.12.025(2). For rule of construction, see RCW 1.12.025(1).

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Intent -- Effective dates -- Application -- Pending cases and rules -- 2010 c 210: See notes following RCW 43.21B.001.

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1996 c 325: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons

or circumstances is not affected." [1996 c 325 § 6.]

 Effective date -- 1996 c 325: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,

and shall take effect immediately [March 30, 1996]." [1996 c 325 § 7.]

 Severability -- 1994 c 257: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons

or circumstances is not affected." [1994 c 257 § 26.]

36.70A.280

Growth management hearings board — Matters subject to review.

(1) The growth management hearings board shall hear and determine only those petitions alleging either:

 (a) That, except as provided otherwise by this subsection, a state agency, county, or city planning under this chapter is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to the

adoption of shoreline master programs or amendments thereto, or chapter 43.21C RCW as it relates to plans, development regulations, or amendments, adopted under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW. Nothing in

this subsection authorizes the board to hear petitions alleging noncompliance with *RCW 36.70A.5801;

 (b) That the twenty-year growth management planning population projections adopted by the office of financial management pursuant to RCW 43.62.035 should be adjusted;

 (c) That the approval of a work plan adopted under RCW 36.70A.735(1)(a) is not in compliance with the requirements of the program established under RCW 36.70A.710;

 (d) That regulations adopted under RCW 36.70A.735(1)(b) are not regionally applicable and cannot be adopted, wholly or partially, by another jurisdiction; or

 (e) That a department certification under RCW 36.70A.735(1)(c) is erroneous.

 (2) A petition may be filed only by: (a) The state, or a county or city that plans under this chapter; (b) a person who has participated orally or in writing before the county or city regarding the matter on which a review is

being requested; (c) a person who is certified by the governor within sixty days of filing the request with the board; or (d) a person qualified pursuant to RCW 34.05.530.

 (3) For purposes of this section "person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, state agency, governmental subdivision or unit thereof, or public or private organization or entity of any character.

 (4) To establish participation standing under subsection (2)(b) of this section, a person must show that his or her participation before the county or city was reasonably related to the person's issue as presented to the

board.

 (5) When considering a possible adjustment to a growth management planning population projection prepared by the office of financial management, the board shall consider the implications of any such adjustment to

the population forecast for the entire state.

 The rationale for any adjustment that is adopted by the board must be documented and filed with the office of financial management within ten working days after adoption.

 If adjusted by the board, a county growth management planning population projection shall only be used for the planning purposes set forth in this chapter and shall be known as the "board adjusted population

projection." None of these changes shall affect the official state and county population forecasts prepared by the office of financial management, which shall continue to be used for state budget and planning purposes.

[2011 c 360 § 17; 2010 c 211 § 7; 2008 c 289 § 5; 2003 c 332 § 2; 1996 c 325 § 2; 1995 c 347 § 108; 1994 c 249 § 31; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 9.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: RCW 36.70A.5801 expired January 1, 2011.

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Findings -- 2008 c 289: "(1) The legislature recognizes that the implications of a changed climate will affect the people, institutions, and economies of Washington. The legislature also recognizes

that it is in the public interest to reduce the state's dependence upon foreign sources of carbon fuels that do not promote energy independence or the economic strength of the state. The legislature

finds that the state, including its counties, cities, and residents, must engage in activities that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence upon foreign oil.

 (2) The legislature further recognizes that: (a) Patterns of land use development influence transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions and the need for foreign oil; (b) fossil fuel-based

transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in Washington; and (c) the state and its residents will not achieve emission reductions established in *RCW 80.80.020 without a

significant decrease in transportation emissions.

 (3) The legislature, therefore, finds that it is in the public interest of the state to provide appropriate legal authority, where required, and to aid in the development of policies, practices, and

methodologies that may assist counties and cities in addressing challenges associated with greenhouse gas emissions and our state's dependence upon foreign oil." [2008 c 289 § 1.]

 *Reviser's note: RCW 80.80.020 was repealed by 2008 c 14 § 13.

 Application -- 2008 c 289: "This act is not intended to amend or affect chapter 353, Laws of 2007." [2008 c 289 § 6.]

 Intent -- 2003 c 332: "This act is intended to codify the Washington State Court of Appeals holding in Wells v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board, 100 Wn. App. 657

(2000), by mandating that to establish participation standing under the growth management act, a person must show that his or her participation before the county or city was reasonably related to

the person's issue as presented to the growth management hearings board." [2003 c 332 § 1.]
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 Severability -- Effective date -- 1996 c 325: See notes following RCW 36.70A.270.

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

 Severability -- Application -- 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310.

Definitions: See RCW 36.70A.703.

36.70A.290

Growth management hearings board — Petitions — Evidence.

(1) All requests for review to the growth management hearings board shall be initiated by filing a petition that includes a detailed statement of issues presented for resolution by the board. The board shall render written

decisions articulating the basis for its holdings. The board shall not issue advisory opinions on issues not presented to the board in the statement of issues, as modified by any prehearing order.

 (2) All petitions relating to whether or not an adopted comprehensive plan, development regulation, or permanent amendment thereto, is in compliance with the goals and requirements of this chapter or chapter 90.58 or

43.21C RCW must be filed within sixty days after publication as provided in (a) through (c) of this subsection.

 (a) Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, the date of publication for a city shall be the date the city publishes the ordinance, or summary of the ordinance, adopting the comprehensive plan or development

regulations, or amendment thereto, as is required to be published.

 (b) Promptly after adoption, a county shall publish a notice that it has adopted the comprehensive plan or development regulations, or amendment thereto.

 Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, for purposes of this section the date of publication for a county shall be the date the county publishes the notice that it has adopted the comprehensive plan or development

regulations, or amendment thereto.

 (c) For local governments planning under RCW 36.70A.040, promptly after approval or disapproval of a local government's shoreline master program or amendment thereto by the department of ecology as provided in

RCW 90.58.090, the department of ecology shall publish a notice that the shoreline master program or amendment thereto has been approved or disapproved. For purposes of this section, the date of publication for the

adoption or amendment of a shoreline master program is the date the department of ecology publishes notice that the shoreline master program or amendment thereto has been approved or disapproved.

 (3) Unless the board dismisses the petition as frivolous or finds that the person filing the petition lacks standing, or the parties have filed an agreement to have the case heard in superior court as provided in RCW

36.70A.295, the board shall, within ten days of receipt of the petition, set a time for hearing the matter.

 (4) The board shall base its decision on the record developed by the city, county, or the state and supplemented with additional evidence if the board determines that such additional evidence would be necessary or of

substantial assistance to the board in reaching its decision.

 (5) The board, shall consolidate, when appropriate, all petitions involving the review of the same comprehensive plan or the same development regulation or regulations.

[2011 c 277 § 1; 2010 c 211 § 8; 1997 c 429 § 12; 1995 c 347 § 109. Prior: 1994 c 257 § 2; 1994 c 249 § 26; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 10.]

Notes:

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

 Severability -- 1994 c 257: See note following RCW 36.70A.270.

 Severability -- Application -- 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310.

36.70A.295

Growth management hearings board — Direct judicial review.

(1) The superior court may directly review a petition for review filed under RCW 36.70A.290 if all parties to the proceeding before the board have agreed to direct review in the superior court. The agreement of the parties

shall be in writing and signed by all of the parties to the proceeding or their designated representatives. The agreement shall include the parties' agreement to proper venue as provided in RCW 36.70A.300(5). The parties

shall file their agreement with the board within ten days after the date the petition is filed, or if multiple petitions have been filed and the board has consolidated the petitions pursuant to RCW 36.70A.300, within ten days

after the board serves its order of consolidation.

 (2) Within ten days of receiving the timely and complete agreement of the parties, the board shall file a certificate of agreement with the designated superior court and shall serve the parties with copies of the certificate.

The superior court shall obtain exclusive jurisdiction over a petition when it receives the certificate of agreement. With the certificate of agreement the board shall also file the petition for review, any orders entered by the

board, all other documents in the board's files regarding the action, and the written agreement of the parties.

 (3) For purposes of a petition that is subject to direct review, the superior court's subject matter jurisdiction shall be equivalent to that of the board. Consistent with the requirements of the superior court civil rules, the

superior court may consolidate a petition subject to direct review under this section with a separate action filed in the superior court.

 (4)(a) Except as otherwise provided in (b) and (c) of this subsection, the provisions of RCW 36.70A.280 through 36.70A.330, which specify the nature and extent of board review, shall apply to the superior court's review.

 (b) The superior court:

 (i) Shall not have jurisdiction to directly review or modify an office of financial management population projection;

 (ii) Except as otherwise provided in RCW 36.70A.300(2)(b), shall render its decision on the petition within one hundred eighty days of receiving the certification of agreement; and

 (iii) Shall give a compliance hearing under RCW 36.70A.330(2) the highest priority of all civil matters before the court.

 (c) An aggrieved party may secure appellate review of a final judgment of the superior court under this section by the supreme court or the court of appeals. The review shall be secured in the manner provided by law for

review of superior court decisions in other civil cases.

 (5) If, following a compliance hearing, the court finds that the state agency, county, or city is not in compliance with the court's prior order, the court may use its remedial and contempt powers to enforce compliance.

 (6) The superior court shall transmit a copy of its decision and order on direct review to the board, the department, and the governor. If the court has determined that a county or city is not in compliance with the

provisions of this chapter, the governor may impose sanctions against the county or city in the same manner as if the board had recommended the imposition of sanctions as provided in RCW 36.70A.330.

 (7) After the court has assumed jurisdiction over a petition for review under this section, the superior court civil rules shall govern a request for intervention and all other procedural matters not specifically provided for in

this section.

[2010 c 211 § 9; 1997 c 429 § 13.]

Notes:
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

36.70A.300

Final orders.

(1) The board shall issue a final order that shall be based exclusively on whether or not a state agency, county, or city is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to adoption or

amendment of shoreline master programs, or chapter 43.21C RCW as it relates to adoption of plans, development regulations, and amendments thereto, under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW.

 (2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, the final order shall be issued within one hundred eighty days of receipt of the petition for review, or, if multiple petitions are filed, within one hundred eighty days of

receipt of the last petition that is consolidated.

 (b) The board may extend the period of time for issuing a decision to enable the parties to settle the dispute if additional time is necessary to achieve a settlement, and (i) an extension is requested by all parties, or (ii) an

extension is requested by the petitioner and respondent and the board determines that a negotiated settlement between the remaining parties could resolve significant issues in dispute. The request must be filed with the

board not later than seven days before the date scheduled for the hearing on the merits of the petition. The board may authorize one or more extensions for up to ninety days each, subject to the requirements of this

section.

 (3) In the final order, the board shall either:

 (a) Find that the state agency, county, or city is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to the adoption or amendment of shoreline master programs, or chapter 43.21C RCW

as it relates to adoption of plans, development regulations, and amendments thereto, under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW; or

 (b) Find that the state agency, county, or city is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter, chapter 90.58 RCW as it relates to the adoption or amendment of shoreline master programs, or chapter 43.21C

RCW as it relates to adoption of plans, development regulations, and amendments thereto, under RCW 36.70A.040 or chapter 90.58 RCW, in which case the board shall remand the matter to the affected state agency,

county, or city. The board shall specify a reasonable time not in excess of one hundred eighty days, or such longer period as determined by the board in cases of unusual scope or complexity, within which the state

agency, county, or city shall comply with the requirements of this chapter. The board may require periodic reports to the board on the progress the jurisdiction is making towards compliance.

 (4) Unless the board makes a determination of invalidity as provided in RCW 36.70A.302, a finding of noncompliance and an order of remand shall not affect the validity of comprehensive plans and development

regulations during the period of remand.

 (5) Any party aggrieved by a final decision of the hearings board may appeal the decision to superior court as provided in RCW 34.05.514 or 36.01.050 within thirty days of the final order of the board.

[1997 c 429 § 14; 1995 c 347 § 110; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 11.]

Notes:

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

36.70A.302

Growth management hearings board — Determination of invalidity — Vesting of development permits — Interim controls.

(1) The board may determine that part or all of a comprehensive plan or development regulations are invalid if the board:

 (a) Makes a finding of noncompliance and issues an order of remand under RCW 36.70A.300;

 (b) Includes in the final order a determination, supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law, that the continued validity of part or parts of the plan or regulation would substantially interfere with the fulfillment of the

goals of this chapter; and

 (c) Specifies in the final order the particular part or parts of the plan or regulation that are determined to be invalid, and the reasons for their invalidity.

 (2) A determination of invalidity is prospective in effect and does not extinguish rights that vested under state or local law before receipt of the board's order by the city or county. The determination of invalidity does not

apply to a completed development permit application for a project that vested under state or local law before receipt of the board's order by the county or city or to related construction permits for that project.

 (3)(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (2) of this section and (b) of this subsection, a development permit application not vested under state or local law before receipt of the board's order by the county or city

vests to the local ordinance or resolution that is determined by the board not to substantially interfere with the fulfillment of the goals of this chapter.

 (b) Even though the application is not vested under state or local law before receipt by the county or city of the board's order, a determination of invalidity does not apply to a development permit application for:

 (i) A permit for construction by any owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for his or her own use or for the use of his or her family on a lot existing before receipt by the county or city of the

board's order, except as otherwise specifically provided in the board's order to protect the public health and safety;

 (ii) A building permit and related construction permits for remodeling, tenant improvements, or expansion of an existing structure on a lot existing before receipt of the board's order by the county or city; and

 (iii) A boundary line adjustment or a division of land that does not increase the number of buildable lots existing before receipt of the board's order by the county or city.

 (4) If the ordinance that adopts a plan or development regulation under this chapter includes a savings clause intended to revive prior policies or regulations in the event the new plan or regulations are determined to be

invalid, the board shall determine under subsection (1) of this section whether the prior policies or regulations are valid during the period of remand.

 (5) A county or city subject to a determination of invalidity may adopt interim controls and other measures to be in effect until it adopts a comprehensive plan and development regulations that comply with the

requirements of this chapter. A development permit application may vest under an interim control or measure upon determination by the board that the interim controls and other measures do not substantially interfere with

the fulfillment of the goals of this chapter.

 (6) A county or city subject to a determination of invalidity may file a motion requesting that the board clarify, modify, or rescind the order. The board shall expeditiously schedule a hearing on the motion. At the hearing

on the motion, the parties may present information to the board to clarify the part or parts of the comprehensive plan or development regulations to which the final order applies. The board shall issue any supplemental

order based on the information provided at the hearing not later than thirty days after the date of the hearing.

 (7)(a) If a determination of invalidity has been made and the county or city has enacted an ordinance or resolution amending the invalidated part or parts of the plan or regulation or establishing interim controls on

development affected by the order of invalidity, after a compliance hearing, the board shall modify or rescind the determination of invalidity if it determines under the standard in subsection (1) of this section that the plan or

regulation, as amended or made subject to such interim controls, will no longer substantially interfere with the fulfillment of the goals of this chapter.

 (b) If the board determines that part or parts of the plan or regulation are no longer invalid as provided in this subsection, but does not find that the plan or regulation is in compliance with all of the requirements of this

chapter, the board, in its order, may require periodic reports to the board on the progress the jurisdiction is making towards compliance.

[2010 c 211 § 10; 1997 c 429 § 16.]
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

Notes:

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

36.70A.305

Expedited review.

The court shall provide expedited review of a determination of invalidity or an order effectuating a determination of invalidity made or issued under *RCW 36.70A.300. The matter must be set for hearing within sixty days of

the date set for submitting the board's record, absent a showing of good cause for a different date or a stipulation of the parties.

[1996 c 325 § 4.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: The reference to RCW 36.70A.300 appears to refer to the amendments made by 1996 c 325 § 3, which was vetoed by the governor.

 Severability -- Effective date -- 1996 c 325: See notes following RCW 36.70A.270.

36.70A.310

Growth management hearings board — Limitations on appeal by the state.

A request for review by the state to the growth management hearings board may be made only by the governor, or with the governor's consent the head of an agency, or by the commissioner of public lands as relating to

state trust lands, for the review of whether: (1) A county or city that is required or chooses to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 has failed to adopt a comprehensive plan or development regulations, or countywide planning

policies within the time limits established by this chapter; or (2) a county or city that is required or chooses to plan under this chapter has adopted a comprehensive plan, development regulations, or countywide planning

policies, that are not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter.

[2010 c 211 § 11; 1994 c 249 § 32; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 12.]

Notes:

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Severability -- Application -- 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310.

36.70A.320

Presumption of validity — Burden of proof — Plans and regulations.

(1) Except as provided in subsection (5) of this section, comprehensive plans and development regulations, and amendments thereto, adopted under this chapter are presumed valid upon adoption.

 (2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (4) of this section, the burden is on the petitioner to demonstrate that any action taken by a state agency, county, or city under this chapter is not in compliance with the

requirements of this chapter.

 (3) In any petition under this chapter, the board, after full consideration of the petition, shall determine whether there is compliance with the requirements of this chapter. In making its determination, the board shall

consider the criteria adopted by the department under RCW 36.70A.190(4). The board shall find compliance unless it determines that the action by the state agency, county, or city is clearly erroneous in view of the entire

record before the board and in light of the goals and requirements of this chapter.

 (4) A county or city subject to a determination of invalidity made under RCW 36.70A.300 or 36.70A.302 has the burden of demonstrating that the ordinance or resolution it has enacted in response to the determination of

invalidity will no longer substantially interfere with the fulfillment of the goals of this chapter under the standard in RCW 36.70A.302(1).

 (5) The shoreline element of a comprehensive plan and the applicable development regulations adopted by a county or city shall take effect as provided in chapter 90.58 RCW.

[1997 c 429 § 20; 1995 c 347 § 111; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 13.]

Notes:

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

36.70A.3201

Growth management hearings board — Legislative intent and finding.

The legislature intends that the board applies a more deferential standard of review to actions of counties and cities than the preponderance of the evidence standard provided for under existing law. In recognition of the

broad range of discretion that may be exercised by counties and cities consistent with the requirements of this chapter, the legislature intends for the board to grant deference to counties and cities in how they plan for

growth, consistent with the requirements and goals of this chapter. Local comprehensive plans and development regulations require counties and cities to balance priorities and options for action in full consideration of

local circumstances. The legislature finds that while this chapter requires local planning to take place within a framework of state goals and requirements, the ultimate burden and responsibility for planning, harmonizing the

planning goals of this chapter, and implementing a county's or city's future rests with that community.

[2010 c 211 § 12; 1997 c 429 § 2.]

Notes:

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: "Except as otherwise specifically provided in RCW 36.70A.335, sections 1 through 21, chapter 429, Laws of 1997 are prospective in effect and

shall not affect the validity of actions taken or decisions made before July 27, 1997." [1997 c 429 § 53.]

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons

or circumstances is not affected." [1997 c 429 § 54.]

36.70A.330
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

Noncompliance.

(1) After the time set for complying with the requirements of this chapter under RCW 36.70A.300(3)(b) has expired, or at an earlier time upon the motion of a county or city subject to a determination of invalidity under RCW

36.70A.300, the board shall set a hearing for the purpose of determining whether the state agency, county, or city is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter.

 (2) The board shall conduct a hearing and issue a finding of compliance or noncompliance with the requirements of this chapter and with any compliance schedule established by the board in its final order. A person with

standing to challenge the legislation enacted in response to the board's final order may participate in the hearing along with the petitioner and the state agency, county, or city. A hearing under this subsection shall be given

the highest priority of business to be conducted by the board, and a finding shall be issued within forty-five days of the filing of the motion under subsection (1) of this section with the board. The board shall issue any order

necessary to make adjustments to the compliance schedule and set additional hearings as provided in subsection (5) of this section.

 (3) If the board after a compliance hearing finds that the state agency, county, or city is not in compliance, the board shall transmit its finding to the governor. The board may recommend to the governor that the sanctions

authorized by this chapter be imposed. The board shall take into consideration the county's or city's efforts to meet its compliance schedule in making the decision to recommend sanctions to the governor.

 (4) In a compliance hearing upon petition of a party, the board shall also reconsider its final order and decide, if no determination of invalidity has been made, whether one now should be made under RCW 36.70A.302.

 (5) The board shall schedule additional hearings as appropriate pursuant to subsections (1) and (2) of this section.

[1997 c 429 § 21; 1995 c 347 § 112; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 14.]

Notes:

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

36.70A.335

Order of invalidity issued before July 27, 1997.

A county or city subject to an order of invalidity issued before July 27, 1997, by motion may request the board to review the order of invalidity in light of the section 14, chapter 429, Laws of 1997 amendments to RCW

36.70A.300, the section 21, chapter 429, Laws of 1997 amendments to RCW 36.70A.330, and RCW 36.70A.302. If a request is made, the board shall rescind or modify the order of invalidity as necessary to make it

consistent with the section 14, chapter 429, Laws of 1997 amendments to RCW 36.70A.300, and to the section 21, chapter 429, Laws of 1997 amendments to RCW 36.70A.330, and RCW 36.70A.302.

[1997 c 429 § 22.]

Notes:

 Prospective application -- 1997 c 429 §§ 1-21: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

36.70A.340

Noncompliance and sanctions.

Upon receipt from the board of a finding that a state agency, county, or city is in noncompliance under RCW 36.70A.330, or as a result of failure to meet the requirements of RCW 36.70A.210, the governor may either:

 (1) Notify and direct the director of the office of financial management to revise allotments in appropriation levels;

 (2) Notify and direct the state treasurer to withhold the portion of revenues to which the county or city is entitled under one or more of the following: The motor vehicle fuel tax, as provided in chapter 82.36 RCW; the

transportation improvement account, as provided in RCW 47.26.084; the rural arterial trust account, as provided in RCW 36.79.150; the sales and use tax, as provided in chapter 82.14 RCW; the liquor profit tax, as

provided in RCW 66.08.190; and the liquor excise tax, as provided in RCW 82.08.170; or

 (3) File a notice of noncompliance with the secretary of state and the county or city, which shall temporarily rescind the county or city's authority to collect the real estate excise tax under RCW 82.46.030 until the

governor files a notice rescinding the notice of noncompliance.

[2011 c 120 § 2; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 26.]

36.70A.345

Sanctions.

The governor may impose a sanction or sanctions specified under RCW 36.70A.340 on: (1) A county or city that fails to designate critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, or mineral resource lands under RCW

36.70A.170 by the date such action was required to have been taken; (2) a county or city that fails to adopt development regulations under RCW 36.70A.060 protecting critical areas or conserving agricultural lands, forest

lands, or mineral resource lands by the date such action was required to have been taken; (3) a county that fails to designate urban growth areas under RCW 36.70A.110 by the date such action was required to have been

taken; and (4) a county or city that fails to adopt its comprehensive plan or development regulations when such actions are required to be taken.

 Imposition of a sanction or sanctions under this section shall be preceded by written findings by the governor, that either the county or city is not proceeding in good faith to meet the requirements of the act; or that the

county or city has unreasonably delayed taking the required action. The governor shall consult with and communicate his or her findings to the growth management hearings board prior to imposing the sanction or

sanctions. For those counties or cities that are not required to plan or have not opted in, the governor in imposing sanctions shall consider the size of the jurisdiction relative to the requirements of this chapter and the

degree of technical and financial assistance provided.

[2010 c 211 § 13; 1994 c 249 § 33; 1993 sp.s. c 6 § 5.]

Notes:

 Effective date -- Transfer of power, duties, and functions -- 2010 c 211: See notes following RCW 36.70A.250.

 Severability -- Application -- 1994 c 249: See notes following RCW 34.05.310.

 Effective date -- 1993 sp.s. c 6: See note following RCW 36.70A.040.

36.70A.350

New fully contained communities.

A county required or choosing to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 may establish a process as part of its urban growth areas, that are designated under RCW 36.70A.110, for reviewing proposals to authorize new fully

contained communities located outside of the initially designated urban growth areas.

 (1) A new fully contained community may be approved in a county planning under this chapter if criteria including but not limited to the following are met:
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (a) New infrastructure is provided for and impact fees are established consistent with the requirements of RCW 82.02.050;

 (b) Transit-oriented site planning and traffic demand management programs are implemented;

 (c) Buffers are provided between the new fully contained communities and adjacent urban development;

 (d) A mix of uses is provided to offer jobs, housing, and services to the residents of the new community;

 (e) Affordable housing is provided within the new community for a broad range of income levels;

 (f) Environmental protection has been addressed and provided for;

 (g) Development regulations are established to ensure urban growth will not occur in adjacent nonurban areas;

 (h) Provision is made to mitigate impacts on designated agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands;

 (i) The plan for the new fully contained community is consistent with the development regulations established for the protection of critical areas by the county pursuant to RCW 36.70A.170.

 (2) New fully contained communities may be approved outside established urban growth areas only if a county reserves a portion of the twenty-year population projection and offsets the urban growth area accordingly

for allocation to new fully contained communities that meet the requirements of this chapter. Any county electing to establish a new community reserve shall do so no more often than once every five years as a part of the

designation or review of urban growth areas required by this chapter. The new community reserve shall be allocated on a project-by-project basis, only after specific project approval procedures have been adopted

pursuant to this chapter as a development regulation. When a new community reserve is established, urban growth areas designated pursuant to this chapter shall accommodate the unreserved portion of the twenty-year

population projection.

 Final approval of an application for a new fully contained community shall be considered an adopted amendment to the comprehensive plan prepared pursuant to RCW 36.70A.070 designating the new fully contained

community as an urban growth area.

[1991 sp.s. c 32 § 16.]

36.70A.360

Master planned resorts.

(1) Counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 may permit master planned resorts which may constitute urban growth outside of urban growth areas as limited by this section. A master planned

resort means a self-contained and fully integrated planned unit development, in a setting of significant natural amenities, with primary focus on destination resort facilities consisting of short-term visitor accommodations

associated with a range of developed on-site indoor or outdoor recreational facilities.

 (2) Capital facilities, utilities, and services, including those related to sewer, water, storm water, security, fire suppression, and emergency medical, provided on-site shall be limited to meeting the needs of the master

planned resort. Such facilities, utilities, and services may be provided to a master planned resort by outside service providers, including municipalities and special purpose districts, provided that all costs associated with

service extensions and capacity increases directly attributable to the master planned resort are fully borne by the resort. A master planned resort and service providers may enter into agreements for shared capital facilities

and utilities, provided that such facilities and utilities serve only the master planned resort or urban growth areas.

 Nothing in this subsection may be construed as: Establishing an order of priority for processing applications for water right permits, for granting such permits, or for issuing certificates of water right; altering or authorizing

in any manner the alteration of the place of use for a water right; or affecting or impairing in any manner whatsoever an existing water right.

 All waters or the use of waters shall be regulated and controlled as provided in chapters 90.03 and 90.44 RCW and not otherwise.

 (3) A master planned resort may include other residential uses within its boundaries, but only if the residential uses are integrated into and support the on-site recreational nature of the resort.

 (4) A master planned resort may be authorized by a county only if:

 (a) The comprehensive plan specifically identifies policies to guide the development of master planned resorts;

 (b) The comprehensive plan and development regulations include restrictions that preclude new urban or suburban land uses in the vicinity of the master planned resort, except in areas otherwise designated for urban

growth under RCW 36.70A.110;

 (c) The county includes a finding as a part of the approval process that the land is better suited, and has more long-term importance, for the master planned resort than for the commercial harvesting of timber or

agricultural production, if located on land that otherwise would be designated as forest land or agricultural land under RCW 36.70A.170;

 (d) The county ensures that the resort plan is consistent with the development regulations established for critical areas; and

 (e) On-site and off-site infrastructure and service impacts are fully considered and mitigated.

[1998 c 112 § 2; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 17.]

Notes:

 Intent -- 1998 c 112: "The primary intent of this act is to give effect to recommendations by the 1994 department of community, trade, and economic development's master planned resort task

force by clarifying that master planned resorts may make use of capital facilities, utilities, and services provided by outside service providers, and may enter into agreements for shared facilities with

such providers, when all costs directly attributable to the resort, including capacity increases, are fully borne by the resort." [1998 c 112 § 1.]

36.70A.362

Master planned resorts — Existing resort may be included.

Counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 may include existing resorts as master planned resorts which may constitute urban growth outside of urban growth areas as limited by this section. An

existing resort means a resort in existence on July 1, 1990, and developed, in whole or in part, as a significantly self-contained and integrated development that includes short-term visitor accommodations associated with a

range of indoor and outdoor recreational facilities within the property boundaries in a setting of significant natural amenities. An existing resort may include other permanent residential uses, conference facilities, and

commercial activities supporting the resort, but only if these other uses are integrated into and consistent with the on-site recreational nature of the resort.

 An existing resort may be authorized by a county only if:

 (1) The comprehensive plan specifically identifies policies to guide the development of the existing resort;

 (2) The comprehensive plan and development regulations include restrictions that preclude new urban or suburban land uses in the vicinity of the existing resort, except in areas otherwise designated for urban growth

under RCW 36.70A.110 and *36.70A.360(1);

 (3) The county includes a finding as a part of the approval process that the land is better suited, and has more long-term importance, for the existing resort than for the commercial harvesting of timber or agricultural

production, if located on land that otherwise would be designated as forest land or agricultural land under RCW 36.70A.170;

 (4) The county finds that the resort plan is consistent with the development regulations established for critical areas; and

 (5) On-site and off-site infrastructure impacts are fully considered and mitigated.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 A county may allocate a portion of its twenty-year population projection, prepared by the office of financial management, to the master planned resort corresponding to the projected number of permanent residents within

the master planned resort.

[1997 c 382 § 1.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: RCW 36.70A.360 was amended by 1998 c 112 § 2, changing subsection (1) to subsection (4)(a).

36.70A.365

Major industrial developments.

A county required or choosing to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 may establish, in consultation with cities consistent with provisions of RCW 36.70A.210, a process for reviewing and approving proposals to authorize siting of

specific major industrial developments outside urban growth areas.

 (1) "Major industrial development" means a master planned location for a specific manufacturing, industrial, or commercial business that: (a) Requires a parcel of land so large that no suitable parcels are available within

an urban growth area; or (b) is a natural resource-based industry requiring a location near agricultural land, forest land, or mineral resource land upon which it is dependent. The major industrial development shall not be for

the purpose of retail commercial development or multitenant office parks.

 (2) A major industrial development may be approved outside an urban growth area in a county planning under this chapter if criteria including, but not limited to the following, are met:

 (a) New infrastructure is provided for and/or applicable impact fees are paid;

 (b) Transit-oriented site planning and traffic demand management programs are implemented;

 (c) Buffers are provided between the major industrial development and adjacent nonurban areas;

 (d) Environmental protection including air and water quality has been addressed and provided for;

 (e) Development regulations are established to ensure that urban growth will not occur in adjacent nonurban areas;

 (f) Provision is made to mitigate adverse impacts on designated agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands;

 (g) The plan for the major industrial development is consistent with the county's development regulations established for protection of critical areas; and

 (h) An inventory of developable land has been conducted and the county has determined and entered findings that land suitable to site the major industrial development is unavailable within the urban growth area.

Priority shall be given to applications for sites that are adjacent to or in close proximity to the urban growth area.

 (3) Final approval of an application for a major industrial development shall be considered an adopted amendment to the comprehensive plan adopted pursuant to RCW 36.70A.070 designating the major industrial

development site on the land use map as an urban growth area. Final approval of an application for a major industrial development shall not be considered an amendment to the comprehensive plan for the purposes of

RCW 36.70A.130(2) and may be considered at any time.

[1995 c 190 § 1.]

36.70A.367

Major industrial developments — Master planned locations.

(1) In addition to the major industrial development allowed under RCW 36.70A.365, a county planning under RCW 36.70A.040 that meets the criteria in subsection (5) of this section may establish, in consultation with cities

consistent with provisions of RCW 36.70A.210, a process for designating a bank of no more than two master planned locations for major industrial activity outside urban growth areas.

 (2) A master planned location for major industrial developments may be approved through a two-step process: Designation of an industrial land bank area in the comprehensive plan; and subsequent approval of specific

major industrial developments through a local master plan process described under subsection (3) of this section.

 (a) The comprehensive plan must identify locations suited to major industrial development due to proximity to transportation or resource assets. The plan must identify the maximum size of the industrial land bank area

and any limitations on major industrial developments based on local limiting factors, but does not need to specify a particular parcel or parcels of property or identify any specific use or user except as limited by this section.

In selecting locations for the industrial land bank area, priority must be given to locations that are adjacent to, or in close proximity to, an urban growth area.

 (b) The environmental review for amendment of the comprehensive plan must be at the programmatic level and, in addition to a threshold determination, must include:

 (i) An inventory of developable land as provided in RCW 36.70A.365; and

 (ii) An analysis of the availability of alternative sites within urban growth areas and the long-term annexation feasibility of sites outside of urban growth areas.

 (c) Final approval of an industrial land bank area under this section must be by amendment to the comprehensive plan adopted under RCW 36.70A.070, and the amendment is exempt from the limitation of RCW

36.70A.130(2) and may be considered at any time. Approval of a specific major industrial development within the industrial land bank area requires no further amendment of the comprehensive plan.

 (3) In concert with the designation of an industrial land bank area, a county shall also adopt development regulations for review and approval of specific major industrial developments through a master plan process. The

regulations governing the master plan process shall ensure, at a minimum, that:

 (a) Urban growth will not occur in adjacent nonurban areas;

 (b) Development is consistent with the county's development regulations adopted for protection of critical areas;

 (c) Required infrastructure is identified and provided concurrent with development. Such infrastructure, however, may be phased in with development;

 (d) Transit-oriented site planning and demand management programs are specifically addressed as part of the master plan approval;

 (e) Provision is made for addressing environmental protection, including air and water quality, as part of the master plan approval;

 (f) The master plan approval includes a requirement that interlocal agreements between the county and service providers, including cities and special purpose districts providing facilities or services to the approved

master plan, be in place at the time of master plan approval;

 (g) A major industrial development is used primarily by industrial and manufacturing businesses, and that the gross floor area of all commercial and service buildings or facilities locating within the major industrial

development does not exceed ten percent of the total gross floor area of buildings or facilities in the development. The intent of this provision for commercial or service use is to meet the needs of employees, clients,

customers, vendors, and others having business at the industrial site, to attract and retain a quality workforce, and to further other public objectives, such as trip reduction. These uses may not be promoted to attract

additional clientele from the surrounding area. Commercial and service businesses must be established concurrently with or subsequent to the industrial or manufacturing businesses;

 (h) New infrastructure is provided for and/or applicable impact fees are paid to assure that adequate facilities are provided concurrently with the development. Infrastructure may be achieved in phases as development

proceeds;
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (i) Buffers are provided between the major industrial development and adjacent rural areas;

 (j) Provision is made to mitigate adverse impacts on designated agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands; and

 (k) An open record public hearing is held before either the planning commission or hearing examiner with notice published at least thirty days before the hearing date and mailed to all property owners within one mile of

the site.

 (4) For the purposes of this section:

 (a) "Major industrial development" means a master planned location suitable for manufacturing or industrial businesses that: (i) Requires a parcel of land so large that no suitable parcels are available within an urban

growth area; (ii) is a natural resource-based industry requiring a location near agricultural land, forest land, or mineral resource land upon which it is dependent; or (iii) requires a location with characteristics such as

proximity to transportation facilities or related industries such that there is no suitable location in an urban growth area. The major industrial development may not be for the purpose of retail commercial development or

multitenant office parks.

 (b) "Industrial land bank" means up to two master planned locations, each consisting of a parcel or parcels of contiguous land, sufficiently large so as not to be readily available within the urban growth area of a city, or

otherwise meeting the criteria contained in (a) of this subsection, suitable for manufacturing, industrial, or commercial businesses and designated by the county through the comprehensive planning process specifically for

major industrial use.

 (5) This section and the termination provisions specified in subsection (6) of this section apply to a county that at the time the process is established under subsection (1) of this section:

 (a) Has a population greater than two hundred fifty thousand and is part of a metropolitan area that includes a city in another state with a population greater than two hundred fifty thousand;

 (b) Has a population greater than one hundred forty thousand and is adjacent to another country;

 (c) Has a population greater than forty thousand but less than seventy-five thousand and has an average level of unemployment for the preceding three years that exceeds the average state unemployment for those

years by twenty percent; and

 (i) Is bordered by the Pacific Ocean;

 (ii) Is located in the Interstate 5 or Interstate 90 corridor; or

 (iii) Is bordered by Hood Canal;

 (d) Is east of the Cascade divide; and

 (i) Borders another state to the south; or

 (ii) Is located wholly south of Interstate 90 and borders the Columbia river to the east; 

 (e) Has an average population density of less than one hundred persons per square mile as determined by the office of financial management, and is bordered by the Pacific Ocean and by Hood Canal; or

 (f) Meets all of the following criteria:

 (i) Has a population greater than forty thousand but fewer than eighty thousand;

 (ii) Has an average level of unemployment for the preceding three years that exceeds the average state unemployment for those years by twenty percent; and

 (iii) Is located in the Interstate 5 or Interstate 90 corridor.

 (6) In order to identify and approve locations for industrial land banks, the county shall take action to designate one or more industrial land banks and adopt conforming regulations as provided by RCW 36.70A.367(2)

on or before the last date to complete that county's next periodic review under RCW 36.70A.130(4) that occurs prior to December 31, 2014. The authority to take action to designate a land bank area in the comprehensive

plan expires if not acted upon by the county within the time frame provided in this section. Once a land bank area has been identified in the county's comprehensive plan, the authority of the county to process a master plan

or site projects within an approved master plan does not expire.

 (7) Any county seeking to designate an industrial land bank under this section must:

 (a) Provide countywide notice, in conformity with RCW 36.70A.035, of the intent to designate an industrial land bank. Notice must be published in a newspaper or newspapers of general circulation reasonably likely to

reach subscribers in all geographic areas of the county. Notice must be provided not less than thirty days prior to commencement of consideration by the county legislative body; and

 (b) Make a written determination of the criteria and rationale used by the legislative body as the basis for siting an industrial land bank under this chapter.

 (8) Any location included in an industrial land bank pursuant to section 2, chapter 289, Laws of 1998, section 1, chapter 402, Laws of 1997, and section 2, chapter 167, Laws of 1996 shall remain available for major

industrial development according to this section as long as the requirements of this section continue to be satisfied.

[2007 c 433 § 1; 2004 c 208 § 1; 2003 c 88 § 1; 2002 c 306 § 1; 2001 c 326 § 1; 1998 c 289 § 2; 1997 c 402 § 1; 1996 c 167 § 2.]

Notes:

 Findings -- Purpose -- 1998 c 289: "The legislature finds that to fulfill the economic development goal of this chapter, it is beneficial to expand the limited authorization for pilot projects for

identifying locations for major industrial activity in advance of specific proposals by an applicant. The legislature further finds that land bank availability may provide economically disadvantaged

counties the opportunity to attract new industrial activity by offering expeditious siting and therefore promote a community's economic health and vitality. The purpose of this act is to authorize and

evaluate additional pilot projects for major industrial activity in economically disadvantaged counties." [1998 c 289 § 1.]

 Findings -- Purpose -- 1996 c 167: "In 1995 the legislature addressed the demand for siting of major industrial facilities by passage of Engrossed Senate Bill No. 5019, implementing a process

for siting such activities outside urban growth areas. The legislature recognizes that the 1995 act requires consideration of numerous factors necessary to ensure that the community can reasonably

accommodate a major industrial development outside an urban growth area.

 The legislature finds that the existing case-by-case procedure for evaluating and approving such a site under the 1995 act may operate to a community's economic disadvantage when a firm, for

business reasons, must make a business location decision expeditiously. The legislature therefore finds that it would be useful to authorize, on a limited basis, and evaluate a process for identifying

locations for major industrial activity in advance of specific proposals by an applicant.

 It is the purpose of this act (1) to authorize a pilot project under which a bank of major industrial development locations outside urban growth areas is created for use in expeditiously siting such a

development; (2) to evaluate the impact of this process on the county's compliance with chapter 36.70A RCW; and (3) to encourage consolidation and planning, and environmental review procedures

under chapter 36.70B RCW." [1996 c 167 § 1.]

 Effective date -- 1996 c 167: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,

and shall take effect immediately [March 28, 1996]." [1996 c 167 § 3.]

36.70A.368

Major industrial developments — Master planned locations — Reclaimed surface coal mine sites.

(1) In addition to the major industrial development allowed under RCW 36.70A.365 and 36.70A.367, a county planning under RCW 36.70A.040 that meets the criteria in subsection (2) of this section may establish, in

consultation with cities consistent with RCW 36.70A.210, a process for designating a master planned location for major industrial activity outside urban growth areas on lands formerly used or designated for surface coal

mining and supporting uses. Once a master planned location is designated, it shall be considered an urban growth area retained for purposes of promoting major industrial activity.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (2) This section applies to a county that, at the time the process is established in subsection (1) of this section, had a surface coal mining operation in excess of three thousand acres that ceased operation after July 1,

2006, and that is located within fifteen miles of the Interstate 5 corridor.

 (3) Designation of a master planned location for major industrial activities is an amendment to the comprehensive plan adopted under RCW 36.70A.070, except that RCW 36.70A.130(2) does not apply so that

designation of master planned locations may be considered at any time. The process established under subsection (1) of this section for designating a master planned location for one or more major industrial activities

must include, but is not limited to, the following comprehensive plan policy criteria:

 (a) The master planned location must be located on lands: Formerly used or designated for surface coal mining and supporting uses; that consist of an aggregation of land of one thousand or more acres, which is not

required to be contiguous; and that are suitable for manufacturing, industrial, or commercial businesses;

 (b) New infrastructure is provided for; and

 (c) Environmental review of a proposed designation of a master planned location must be at the programmatic level, as long as the environmental review of a proposed designation that is being reviewed concurrent with

a proposed major industrial activity is at the project level.

 (4) Approval of a specific major industrial activity proposed for a master planned location designated under this section is through a local master plan process and does not require further comprehensive plan

amendment. The process for reviewing and approving a specific major industrial activity proposed for a master planned location designated under this section must include the following criteria in adopted development

regulations:

 (a) The site consists of one hundred or more acres of land formerly used or designated for surface coal mining and supporting uses that has been or will be reclaimed as land suitable for industrial development;

 (b) Urban growth will not occur in adjacent nonurban areas;

 (c) Environmental review of a specific proposed major industrial activity must be conducted as required in chapter 43.21C RCW. Environmental review may be processed as a planned action, as long as it meets the

requirements of *RCW 43.21C.031; and

 (d) Commercial development within a master planned location must be directly related to manufacturing or industrial uses. Commercial uses shall not exceed ten percent of the total gross floor area of buildings or

facilities in the development.

 (5) Final approval of the designation of a master planned location designated under subsection (3) of this section is subject to appeal under this chapter. Approval of a specific major industrial activity under subsection

(4) of this section is subject to appeal under chapter 36.70C RCW.

 (6) RCW 36.70A.365 and 36.70A.367 do not apply to the designation of master planned locations or the review and approval of specific major industrial activities under this section.

[2007 c 194 § 1.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: The requirements for a planned action were moved by 2012 1st sp.s. c 1 from RCW 43.21C.031 to RCW 43.21C.440.

36.70A.370

Protection of private property.

(1) The state attorney general shall establish by October 1, 1991, an orderly, consistent process, including a checklist if appropriate, that better enables state agencies and local governments to evaluate proposed

regulatory or administrative actions to assure that such actions do not result in an unconstitutional taking of private property. It is not the purpose of this section to expand or reduce the scope of private property protections

provided in the state and federal Constitutions. The attorney general shall review and update the process at least on an annual basis to maintain consistency with changes in case law.

 (2) Local governments that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 and state agencies shall utilize the process established by subsection (1) of this section to assure that proposed regulatory or

administrative actions do not result in an unconstitutional taking of private property.

 (3) The attorney general, in consultation with the Washington state bar association, shall develop a continuing education course to implement this section.

 (4) The process used by government agencies shall be protected by attorney client privilege. Nothing in this section grants a private party the right to seek judicial relief requiring compliance with the provisions of this

section.

[1991 sp.s. c 32 § 18.]

36.70A.380

Extension of designation date.

The department may extend the date by which a county or city is required to designate agricultural lands, forest lands, mineral resource lands, and critical areas under RCW 36.70A.170, or the date by which a county or

city is required to protect such lands and critical areas under RCW 36.70A.060, if the county or city demonstrates that it is proceeding in an orderly fashion, and is making a good faith effort, to meet these requirements. An

extension may be for up to an additional one hundred eighty days. The length of an extension shall be based on the difficulty of the effort to conform with these requirements.

[1991 sp.s. c 32 § 39.]

36.70A.385

Environmental planning pilot projects.

(1) The legislature intends to determine whether the environmental review process mandated under chapter 43.21C RCW may be enhanced and simplified, and coordination improved, when applied to comprehensive plans

mandated by this chapter. The department shall undertake pilot projects on environmental review to determine if the review process can be improved by fostering more coordination and eliminating duplicative

environmental analysis which is made to assist decision makers approving comprehensive plans pursuant to this chapter. Such pilot projects should be designed and scoped to consider cumulative impacts resulting from

plan decisions, plan impacts on environmental quality, impacts on adjacent jurisdictions, and similar factors in sufficient depth to simplify the analysis of subsequent specific projects being carried out pursuant to the

approved plan.

 (2) The legislature hereby authorizes the department to establish, in cooperation with business, industry, cities, counties, and other interested parties, at least two but not more than four pilot projects, one of which shall

be with a county, on enhanced draft and final nonproject environmental analysis of comprehensive plans prepared pursuant to this chapter, for the purposes outlined in subsection (1) of this section. The department may

select appropriate geographic subareas within a comprehensive plan if that will best serve the purposes of this section and meet the requirements of chapter 43.21C RCW.

 (3) An enhanced draft and final nonproject environmental analysis prepared pursuant to this section shall follow the rules adopted pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW.

 (4) Not later than December 31, 1993, the department shall evaluate the overall effectiveness of the pilot projects under this section regarding preparing enhanced nonproject environmental analysis for the approval

process of comprehensive plans and shall:

 (a) Provide an interim report of its findings to the legislature with such recommendations as may be appropriate, including the need, if any, for further legislation;

 (b) Consider adoption of any further rules or guidelines as may be appropriate to assist counties and cities in meeting requirements of chapter 43.21C RCW when considering comprehensive plans; and
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (c) Prepare and circulate to counties and cities such instructional manuals or other information derived from the pilot projects as will assist all counties and cities in meeting the requirements and objectives of chapter

43.21C RCW in the most expeditious and efficient manner in the process of considering comprehensive plans pursuant to this chapter.

[1998 c 245 § 30; 1995 c 399 § 43; 1991 sp.s. c 32 § 20.]

36.70A.390

Moratoria, interim zoning controls — Public hearing — Limitation on length — Exceptions.

A county or city governing body that adopts a moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control without holding a public hearing on the proposed moratorium, interim zoning map, interim

zoning ordinance, or interim official control, shall hold a public hearing on the adopted moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control within at least sixty days of its adoption, whether or

not the governing body received a recommendation on the matter from the planning commission or department. If the governing body does not adopt findings of fact justifying its action before this hearing, then the

governing body shall do so immediately after this public hearing. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control adopted under this section may be effective for not longer than six

months, but may be effective for up to one year if a work plan is developed for related studies providing for such a longer period. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control may

be renewed for one or more six-month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal.

 This section does not apply to the designation of critical areas, agricultural lands, forest lands, and mineral resource lands, under RCW 36.70A.170, and the conservation of these lands and protection of these areas

under RCW 36.70A.060, prior to such actions being taken in a comprehensive plan adopted under RCW 36.70A.070 and implementing development regulations adopted under RCW 36.70A.120, if a public hearing is held

on such proposed actions.

[1992 c 207 § 6.]

36.70A.400

Accessory apartments.

Any local government, as defined in RCW 43.63A.215, that is planning under this chapter shall comply with RCW 43.63A.215(3).

[1993 c 478 § 11.]

36.70A.410

Treatment of residential structures occupied by persons with handicaps.

No county or city that plans or elects to plan under this chapter may enact or maintain an ordinance, development regulation, zoning regulation or official control, policy, or administrative practice which treats a residential

structure occupied by persons with handicaps differently than a similar residential structure occupied by a family or other unrelated individuals. As used in this section, "handicaps" are as defined in the federal fair housing

amendments act of 1988 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 3602).

[1993 c 478 § 23.]

36.70A.420

Transportation projects — Findings — Intent.

The legislature recognizes that there are major transportation projects that affect multiple jurisdictions as to economic development, fiscal influence, environmental consequences, land use implications, and mobility of

people and goods. The legislature further recognizes that affected jurisdictions have important interests that must be addressed, and that these jurisdictions' present environmental planning and permitting authority may

result in multiple local permits and other requirements being specified for the projects.

 The legislature finds that the present permitting system may result in segmented and sequential decisions by local governments that do not optimally serve all the parties with an interest in the decisions. The present

system may also make more difficult achieving the consistency among plans and actions that is an important aspect of this chapter.

 It is the intent of the legislature to provide for more efficiency and equity in the decisions of local governments regarding major transportation projects by encouraging coordination or consolidation of the processes for

reviewing environmental planning and permitting requirements for those projects. The legislature intends that local governments coordinate their regulatory decisions by considering together the range of local, state, and

federal requirements for major transportation projects. Nothing in RCW 36.70A.420 or 36.70A.430 alters the authority of cities or counties under any other planning or permitting statute.

[1994 c 258 § 1.]

Notes:

 Captions not law -- 1994 c 258: "Section captions used in this act constitute no part of the law." [1994 c 258 § 6.]

36.70A.430

Transportation projects — Collaborative review process.

For counties engaged in planning under this chapter, there shall be established by December 31, 1994, a collaborative process to review and coordinate state and local permits for all transportation projects that cross more

than one city or county boundary. This process shall at a minimum, establish a mechanism among affected cities and counties to designate a permit coordinating agency to facilitate multijurisdictional review and approval

of such transportation projects.

[1994 c 258 § 2.]

Notes:

 Captions not law -- 1994 c 258: See note following RCW 36.70A.420.

36.70A.450

Family day-care provider's home facility — County or city may not prohibit in residential or commercial area — Conditions.

(1) Except as provided in subsections (2) and (3) of this section, no county or city may enact, enforce, or maintain an ordinance, development regulation, zoning regulation, or official control, policy, or administrative practice

that prohibits the use of a residential dwelling, located in an area zoned for residential or commercial use, as a family day-care provider's home facility.

 (2) A county or city may require that the facility: (a) Comply with all building, fire, safety, health code, and business licensing requirements; (b) conform to lot size, building size, setbacks, and lot coverage standards

applicable to the zoning district except if the structure is a legal nonconforming structure; (c) is certified by the department of early learning licensor as providing a safe passenger loading area; (d) include signage, if any,

that conforms to applicable regulations; and (e) limit hours of operations to facilitate neighborhood compatibility, while also providing appropriate opportunity for persons who use family day-care and who work a

nonstandard work shift.

 (3) A county or city may also require that the family day-care provider, before state licensing, require proof of written notification by the provider that the immediately adjoining property owners have been informed of the

intent to locate and maintain such a facility. If a dispute arises between neighbors and the family day-care provider over licensing requirements, the licensor may provide a forum to resolve the dispute.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (4) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a county or city from imposing zoning conditions on the establishment and maintenance of a family day-care provider's home in an area zoned for residential or

commercial use, so long as such conditions are no more restrictive than conditions imposed on other residential dwellings in the same zone and the establishment of such facilities is not precluded. As used in this section,

"family day-care provider" is as defined in RCW 43.215.010.

[2007 c 17 § 13; 2003 c 286 § 5; 1995 c 49 § 3; 1994 c 273 § 17.]

36.70A.460

Watershed restoration projects — Permit processing — Fish habitat enhancement project.

A permit required under this chapter for a watershed restoration project as defined in RCW 89.08.460 shall be processed in compliance with RCW 89.08.450 through 89.08.510. A fish habitat enhancement project meeting

the criteria of *RCW 77.55.290(1) shall be reviewed and approved according to the provisions of *RCW 77.55.290.

[2003 c 39 § 21; 1998 c 249 § 11; 1995 c 378 § 11.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: RCW 77.55.290 was recodified as RCW 77.55.181 pursuant to 2005 c 146 § 1001.

 Findings -- Purpose -- Report -- Effective date -- 1998 c 249: See notes following RCW 77.55.181.

36.70A.470

Project review — Amendment suggestion procedure — Definitions.

(1) Project review, which shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of chapter 36.70B RCW, shall be used to make individual project decisions, not land use planning decisions. If, during project review, a county or city

planning under RCW 36.70A.040 identifies deficiencies in plans or regulations:

 (a) The permitting process shall not be used as a comprehensive planning process;

 (b) Project review shall continue; and

 (c) The identified deficiencies shall be docketed for possible future plan or development regulation amendments.

 (2) Each county and city planning under RCW 36.70A.040 shall include in its development regulations a procedure for any interested person, including applicants, citizens, hearing examiners, and staff of other agencies,

to suggest plan or development regulation amendments. The suggested amendments shall be docketed and considered on at least an annual basis, consistent with the provisions of RCW 36.70A.130.

 (3) For purposes of this section, a deficiency in a comprehensive plan or development regulation refers to the absence of required or potentially desirable contents of a comprehensive plan or development regulation. It

does not refer to whether a development regulation addresses a project's probable specific adverse environmental impacts which the permitting agency could mitigate in the normal project review process.

 (4) For purposes of this section, docketing refers to compiling and maintaining a list of suggested changes to the comprehensive plan or development regulations in a manner that will ensure such suggested changes will

be considered by the county or city and will be available for review by the public.

[1995 c 347 § 102.]

Notes:

 Findings -- Intent -- 1995 c 347 § 102: "The legislature finds that during project review, a county or city planning under RCW 36.70A.040 is likely to discover the need to make various

improvements in comprehensive plans and development regulations. There is no current requirement or process for applicants, citizens, or agency staff to ensure that these improvements are

considered in the plan review process. The legislature also finds that in the past environmental review and permitting of proposed projects have been used to reopen and make land use planning

decisions that should have been made through the comprehensive planning process, in part because agency staff and hearing examiners have not been able to ensure consideration of all issues in

the local planning process. The legislature further finds that, while plans and regulations should be improved and refined over time, it is unfair to penalize applicants that have submitted permit

applications that meet current requirements. It is the intent of the legislature in enacting RCW 36.70A.470 to establish a means by which cities and counties will docket suggested plan or

development regulation amendments and ensure their consideration during the planning process." [1995 c 347 § 101.]

 Finding -- 1995 c 347: "The legislature recognizes by this act that the growth management act is a fundamental building block of regulatory reform. The state and local governments have

invested considerable resources in an act that should serve as the integrating framework for all other land-use related laws. The growth management act provides the means to effectively combine

certainty for development decisions, reasonable environmental protection, long-range planning for cost-effective infrastructure, and orderly growth and development." [1995 c 347 § 1.]

 Severability -- 1995 c 347: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons

or circumstances is not affected." [1995 c 347 § 901.]

 Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: "Part headings and the table of contents as used in this act do not constitute any part of the law." [1995 c 347 § 902.]

36.70A.480

Shorelines of the state.

(1) For shorelines of the state, the goals and policies of the shoreline management act as set forth in RCW 90.58.020 are added as one of the goals of this chapter as set forth in RCW 36.70A.020 without creating an order

of priority among the fourteen goals. The goals and policies of a shoreline master program for a county or city approved under chapter 90.58 RCW shall be considered an element of the county or city's comprehensive

plan. All other portions of the shoreline master program for a county or city adopted under chapter 90.58 RCW, including use regulations, shall be considered a part of the county or city's development regulations.

 (2) The shoreline master program shall be adopted pursuant to the procedures of chapter 90.58 RCW rather than the goals, policies, and procedures set forth in this chapter for the adoption of a comprehensive plan or

development regulations.

 (3)(a) The policies, goals, and provisions of chapter 90.58 RCW and applicable guidelines shall be the sole basis for determining compliance of a shoreline master program with this chapter except as the shoreline

master program is required to comply with the internal consistency provisions of RCW 36.70A.070, 36.70A.040(4), 35.63.125, and 35A.63.105.

 (b) Except as otherwise provided in (c) of this subsection, development regulations adopted under this chapter to protect critical areas within shorelines of the state apply within shorelines of the state until the department

of ecology approves one of the following: A comprehensive master program update, as defined in RCW 90.58.030; a segment of a master program relating to critical areas, as provided in RCW 90.58.090; or a new or

amended master program approved by the department of ecology on or after March 1, 2002, as provided in RCW 90.58.080. The adoption or update of development regulations to protect critical areas under this chapter

prior to department of ecology approval of a master program update as provided in this subsection is not a comprehensive or segment update to the master program.

 (c)(i) Until the department of ecology approves a master program or segment of a master program as provided in (b) of this subsection, a use or structure legally located within shorelines of the state that was established

or vested on or before the effective date of the local government's development regulations to protect critical areas may continue as a conforming use and may be redeveloped or modified if: (A) The redevelopment or

modification is consistent with the local government's master program; and (B) the local government determines that the proposed redevelopment or modification will result in no net loss of shoreline ecological functions.

The local government may waive this requirement if the redevelopment or modification is consistent with the master program and the local government's development regulations to protect critical areas.

 (ii) For purposes of this subsection (3)(c), an agricultural activity that does not expand the area being used for the agricultural activity is not a redevelopment or modification. "Agricultural activity," as used in this

subsection (3)(c), has the same meaning as defined in RCW 90.58.065.

 (d) Upon department of ecology approval of a shoreline master program or critical area segment of a shoreline master program, critical areas within shorelines of the state are protected under chapter 90.58 RCW and
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

are not subject to the procedural and substantive requirements of this chapter, except as provided in subsection (6) of this section. Nothing in chapter 321, Laws of 2003 or chapter 107, Laws of 2010 is intended to affect

whether or to what extent agricultural activities, as defined in RCW 90.58.065, are subject to chapter 36.70A RCW.

 (e) The provisions of RCW 36.70A.172 shall not apply to the adoption or subsequent amendment of a local government's shoreline master program and shall not be used to determine compliance of a local government's

shoreline master program with chapter 90.58 RCW and applicable guidelines. Nothing in this section, however, is intended to limit or change the quality of information to be applied in protecting critical areas within

shorelines of the state, as required by chapter 90.58 RCW and applicable guidelines.

 (4) Shoreline master programs shall provide a level of protection to critical areas located within shorelines of the state that assures no net loss of shoreline ecological functions necessary to sustain shoreline natural

resources as defined by department of ecology guidelines adopted pursuant to RCW 90.58.060.

 (5) Shorelines of the state shall not be considered critical areas under this chapter except to the extent that specific areas located within shorelines of the state qualify for critical area designation based on the definition

of critical areas provided by RCW 36.70A.030(5) and have been designated as such by a local government pursuant to RCW 36.70A.060(2).

 (6) If a local jurisdiction's master program does not include land necessary for buffers for critical areas that occur within shorelines of the state, as authorized by *RCW 90.58.030(2)(f), then the local jurisdiction shall

continue to regulate those critical areas and their required buffers pursuant to RCW 36.70A.060(2).

[2010 c 107 § 2; 2003 c 321 § 5; 1995 c 347 § 104.]

Notes:

 *Reviser's note: RCW 90.58.030 was alphabetized pursuant to RCW 1.08.015(2)(k), changing subsection (2)(f) to subsection (2)(d).

 Intent -- 2010 c 107: "(1) The legislature recognizes that Engrossed Substitute House Bill No. 1933, enacted as chapter 321, Laws of 2003, modified the relationship between the shoreline

management act and the growth management act. The legislature recognizes also that its 2003 efforts, while intended to create greater operational clarity between these significant shoreline and land

use acts, have been the subject of differing, and occasionally contrary, legal interpretations. This act is intended to affirm and clarify the legislature's intent relating to the provisions of chapter 321,

Laws of 2003.

 (2) The legislature affirms that development regulations adopted under the growth management act to protect critical areas apply within shorelines of the state as provided in section 2 of this act.

 (3) The legislature affirms that the adoption or update of critical area regulations under the growth management act is not automatically an update to the shoreline master program.

 (4) The legislature intends for this act to be remedial and curative in nature, and to apply retroactively to July 27, 2003." [2010 c 107 § 1.]

 Retroactive application -- 2010 c 107: "This act is remedial and curative in nature and applies retroactively to July 27, 2003." [2010 c 107 § 5.]

 Effective date -- 2010 c 107: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,

and takes effect immediately [March 18, 2010]." [2010 c 107 § 6.]

 Finding -- Intent -- 2003 c 321: See note following RCW 90.58.030.

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

36.70A.481

Construction — Chapter 347, Laws of 1995.

Nothing in RCW 36.70A.480 shall be construed to authorize a county or city to adopt regulations applicable to shorelands as defined in RCW 90.58.030 that are inconsistent with the provisions of chapter 90.58 RCW.

[1995 c 382 § 13.]

36.70A.490

Growth management planning and environmental review fund — Established.

The growth management planning and environmental review fund is hereby established in the state treasury. Moneys may be placed in the fund from the proceeds of bond sales, tax revenues, budget transfers, federal

appropriations, gifts, or any other lawful source. Moneys in the fund may be spent only after appropriation. Moneys in the fund shall be used to make grants or loans to local governments for the purposes set forth in RCW

43.21C.240, 43.21C.031, or 36.70A.500. Any payment of either principal or interest, or both, derived from loans made from this fund must be deposited into the fund.

[2012 1st sp.s. c 1 § 309; 1995 c 347 § 115.]

Notes:

 Finding -- Intent -- Limitation -- Authority of department of fish and wildlife under act -- Jurisdiction/authority of Indian tribe under act -- 2012 1st sp.s. c 1: See notes following RCW

77.55.011.

 Findings -- Purpose -- 1995 c 347 § 115: "(1) The legislature finds that:

 (a) As of July 23, 1995, twenty-nine counties and two hundred eight cities are conducting comprehensive planning under the growth management act, chapter 36.70A RCW, which together

comprise over ninety percent of the state's population;

 (b) Comprehensive plans for many of the jurisdictions were due by July 1, 1994, and the remaining jurisdictions must complete plans under due dates ranging from October 1994 to September

1997;

 (c) Concurrently with these comprehensive planning activities, local governments must conduct several other planning requirements under the growth management act, such as the adoption of

capital facilities plans, urban growth areas, and development regulations;

 (d) Local governments must also comply with the state environmental policy act, chapter 43.21C RCW, in the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations;

 (e) The combined activities of comprehensive planning and the state environmental policy act present a serious fiscal burden upon local governments; and

 (f) Detailed environmental analysis integrated with comprehensive plans, subarea plans, and development regulations will facilitate planning for and managing growth, allow greater protection of

the environment, and benefit both the general public and private property owners.

 (2) In order to provide financial assistance to cities and counties planning under chapter 36.70A RCW and to improve the usefulness of plans and integrated environmental analyses, the legislature

has created the fund described in RCW 36.70A.490." [1995 c 347 § 114.]

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

36.70A.500

Growth management planning and environmental review fund — Awarding of grant or loan — Procedures.

(1) The department of commerce shall provide management services for the growth management planning and environmental review fund created by RCW 36.70A.490. The department shall establish procedures for fund

management. The department shall encourage participation in the grant or loan program by other public agencies. The department shall develop the grant or loan criteria, monitor the grant or loan program, and select grant
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

or loan recipients in consultation with state agencies participating in the grant or loan program through the provision of grant or loan funds or technical assistance.

 (2) A grant or loan may be awarded to a county or city that is required to or has chosen to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 and that is qualified pursuant to this section. The grant or loan shall be provided to assist a county

or city in paying for the cost of preparing an environmental analysis under chapter 43.21C RCW, that is integrated with a comprehensive plan, subarea plan, plan element, countywide planning policy, development

regulation, monitoring program, or other planning activity adopted under or implementing this chapter that:

 (a) Improves the process for project permit review while maintaining environmental quality; or

 (b) Encourages use of plans and information developed for purposes of complying with this chapter to satisfy requirements of other state programs.

 (3) In order to qualify for a grant or loan, a county or city shall:

 (a) Demonstrate that it will prepare an environmental analysis pursuant to chapter 43.21C RCW and subsection (2) of this section that is integrated with a comprehensive plan, subarea plan, plan element, countywide

planning policy, development regulations, monitoring program, or other planning activity adopted under or implementing this chapter;

 (b) Address environmental impacts and consequences, alternatives, and mitigation measures in sufficient detail to allow the analysis to be adopted in whole or in part by applicants for development permits within the

geographic area analyzed in the plan;

 (c) Demonstrate that procedures for review of development permit applications will be based on the integrated plans and environmental analysis;

 (d) Include mechanisms to monitor the consequences of growth as it occurs in the plan area and to use the resulting data to update the plan, policy, or implementing mechanisms and associated environmental analysis;

 (e) Demonstrate substantial progress towards compliance with the requirements of this chapter. A county or city that is more than six months out of compliance with a requirement of this chapter is deemed not to be

making substantial progress towards compliance; and

 (f) Provide local funding, which may include financial participation by the private sector.

 (4) In awarding grants or loans, the department shall give preference to proposals that include one or more of the following elements:

 (a) Financial participation by the private sector, or a public/private partnering approach;

 (b) Identification and monitoring of system capacities for elements of the built environment, and to the extent appropriate, of the natural environment;

 (c) Coordination with state, federal, and tribal governments in project review;

 (d) Furtherance of important state objectives related to economic development, protection of areas of statewide significance, and siting of essential public facilities;

 (e) Programs to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the permitting process by greater reliance on integrated plans and prospective environmental analysis;

 (f) Programs for effective citizen and neighborhood involvement that contribute to greater likelihood that planning decisions can be implemented with community support;

 (g) Programs to identify environmental impacts and establish mitigation measures that provide effective means to satisfy concurrency requirements and establish project consistency with the plans; or

 (h) Environmental review that addresses the impacts of increased density or intensity of comprehensive plans, subarea plans, or receiving areas designated by a city or town under the regional transfer of development

rights program in chapter 43.362 RCW.

 (5) If the local funding includes funding provided by other state functional planning programs, including open space planning and watershed or basin planning, the functional plan shall be integrated into and be consistent

with the comprehensive plan.

 (6) State agencies shall work with grant or loan recipients to facilitate state and local project review processes that will implement the projects receiving grants or loans under this section.

[2012 1st sp.s. c 1 § 310; 1997 c 429 § 28; 1995 c 347 § 116.]

Notes:

 Finding -- Intent -- Limitation -- Authority of department of fish and wildlife under act -- Jurisdiction/authority of Indian tribe under act -- 2012 1st sp.s. c 1: See notes following RCW

77.55.011.

 Severability -- 1997 c 429: See note following RCW 36.70A.3201.

 Finding -- Severability -- Part headings and table of contents not law -- 1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.

36.70A.510

General aviation airports.

Adoption and amendment of comprehensive plan provisions and development regulations under this chapter affecting a general aviation airport are subject to RCW 36.70.547.

[1996 c 239 § 5.]

36.70A.520

National historic towns — Designation.

Counties that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040 may authorize and designate national historic towns that may constitute urban growth outside of urban growth areas as limited by this section. A

national historic town means a town or district that has been designated a national historic landmark by the United States secretary of the interior pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 461 et seq., as amended, based on its significant

historic urban features, and which historically contained a mix of residential and commercial or industrial uses.

 A national historic town may be designated under this chapter by a county only if:

 (1) The comprehensive plan specifically identifies policies to guide the preservation, redevelopment, infill, and development of the town;

 (2) The comprehensive plan and development regulations specify a mix of residential, commercial, industrial, tourism-recreation, waterfront, or other historical uses, along with other uses, infrastructure, and services

which promote the economic sustainability of the town and its historic character. To promote historic preservation, redevelopment, and an economically sustainable community, the town also may include the types of uses

that existed at times during its history and is not limited to those present at the time of the historic designation. Portions of the town may include urban densities if they reflect density patterns that existed at times during its

history;

 (3) The boundaries of the town include all of the area contained in the national historic landmark designation, along with any additional limited areas determined by the county as appropriate for transitional uses and

buffering. Provisions for transitional uses and buffering must be compatible with the town's historic character and must protect the existing natural and built environment under the requirements of this chapter within and

beyond the additional limited areas, including visual compatibility. The comprehensive plan and development regulations must include restrictions that preclude new urban or suburban land uses in the vicinity of the town,

including the additional limited areas, except in areas otherwise designated for urban growth under this chapter;

 (4) The development regulations provide for architectural controls and review procedures applicable to the rehabilitation, redevelopment, infill, or new development to promote the historic character of the town;
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (5) The county finds that the national historic town is consistent with the development regulations established for critical areas; and

 (6) On-site and off-site infrastructure impacts are fully considered and mitigated concurrent with development.

 A county may allocate a portion of its twenty-year population projection, prepared by the office of financial management, to the national historic town corresponding to the projected number of permanent residents within

the national historic town.

[2000 c 196 § 1.]

36.70A.530

Land use development incompatible with military installation not allowed — Revision of comprehensive plans and development regulations.

(1) Military installations are of particular importance to the economic health of the state of Washington and it is a priority of the state to protect the land surrounding our military installations from incompatible development.

 (2) Comprehensive plans, amendments to comprehensive plans, development regulations, or amendments to development regulations adopted under this section shall be adopted or amended concurrent with the

scheduled update provided in RCW 36.70A.130, except that counties and cities identified in RCW 36.70A.130(4)(a) shall comply with this section on or before December 1, 2005, and shall thereafter comply with this

section on a schedule consistent with RCW 36.70A.130(4).

 (3) A comprehensive plan, amendment to a plan, a development regulation or amendment to a development regulation, should not allow development in the vicinity of a military installation that is incompatible with the

installation's ability to carry out its mission requirements. A city or county may find that an existing comprehensive plan or development regulations are compatible with the installation's ability to carry out its mission

requirements.

 (4) As part of the requirements of RCW 36.70A.070(1) each county and city planning under RCW 36.70A.040 that has a federal military installation, other than a reserve center, that employs one hundred or more

personnel and is operated by the United States department of defense within or adjacent to its border, shall notify the commander of the military installation of the county's or city's intent to amend its comprehensive plan or

development regulations to address lands adjacent to military installations to ensure those lands are protected from incompatible development.

 (5)(a) The notice provided under subsection (4) of this section shall request from the commander of the military installation a written recommendation and supporting facts relating to the use of land being considered in

the adoption of a comprehensive plan or an amendment to a plan. The notice shall provide sixty days for a response from the commander. If the commander does not submit a response to such request within sixty days,

the local government may presume that implementation of the proposed plan or amendment will not have any adverse effect on the operation of the installation.

 (b) When a county or city intends to amend its development regulations to be consistent with the comprehensive plan elements addressed in (a) of this subsection, notice shall be provided to the commander of the

military installation consistent with subsection (4) of this section. The notice shall request from the commander of the military installation a written recommendation and supporting facts relating to the use of land being

considered in the amendment to the development regulations. The notice shall provide sixty days for a response from the commander to the requesting government. If the commander does not submit a response to such

request within sixty days, the local government may presume that implementation of the proposed development regulation or amendment will not have any adverse effect on the operation of the installation.

[2004 c 28 § 2.]

Notes:

 Finding -- 2004 c 28: "The United States military is a vital component of the Washington state economy. The protection of military installations from incompatible development of land is essential

to the health of Washington's economy and quality of life. Incompatible development of land close to a military installation reduces the ability of the military to complete its mission or to undertake new

missions, and increases its cost of operating. The department of defense evaluates continued utilization of military installations based upon their operating costs, their ability to carry out missions, and

their ability to undertake new missions." [2004 c 28 § 1.]

36.70A.540

Affordable housing incentive programs — Low-income housing units.

(1)(a) Any city or county planning under RCW 36.70A.040 may enact or expand affordable housing incentive programs providing for the development of low-income housing units through development regulations or

conditions on rezoning or permit decisions, or both, on one or more of the following types of development: Residential; commercial; industrial; or mixed-use. An affordable housing incentive program may include, but is not

limited to, one or more of the following:

 (i) Density bonuses within the urban growth area;

 (ii) Height and bulk bonuses;

 (iii) Fee waivers or exemptions;

 (iv) Parking reductions; or

 (v) Expedited permitting.

 (b) The city or county may enact or expand such programs whether or not the programs may impose a tax, fee, or charge on the development or construction of property.

 (c) If a developer chooses not to participate in an optional affordable housing incentive program adopted and authorized under this section, a city, county, or town may not condition, deny, or delay the issuance of a

permit or development approval that is consistent with zoning and development standards on the subject property absent incentive provisions of this program.

 (2) Affordable housing incentive programs enacted or expanded under this section shall comply with the following:

 (a) The incentives or bonuses shall provide for the development of low-income housing units;

 (b) Jurisdictions shall establish standards for low-income renter or owner occupancy housing, including income guidelines consistent with local housing needs, to assist low-income households that cannot afford marketrate housing. Low-income households are defined for renter and owner occupancy program purposes as follows:

 (i) Rental housing units to be developed shall be affordable to and occupied by households with an income of fifty percent or less of the county median family income, adjusted for family size; 

 (ii) Owner occupancy housing units shall be affordable to and occupied by households with an income of eighty percent or less of the county median family income, adjusted for family size. The legislative authority of a

jurisdiction, after holding a public hearing, may establish lower income levels; and

 (iii) The legislative authority of a jurisdiction, after holding a public hearing, may also establish higher income levels for rental housing or for owner occupancy housing upon finding that higher income levels are needed

to address local housing market conditions. The higher income level for rental housing may not exceed eighty percent of the county area median family income. The higher income level for owner occupancy housing may

not exceed one hundred percent of the county area median family income. These established higher income levels are considered "low-income" for the purposes of this section;

 (c) The jurisdiction shall establish a maximum rent level or sales price for each low-income housing unit developed under the terms of a program and may adjust these levels or prices based on the average size of the

household expected to occupy the unit. For renter-occupied housing units, the total housing costs, including basic utilities as determined by the jurisdiction, may not exceed thirty percent of the income limit for the lowincome housing unit;

 (d) Where a developer is utilizing a housing incentive program authorized under this section to develop market rate housing, and is developing low-income housing to satisfy the requirements of the housing incentive

program, the low-income housing units shall be provided in a range of sizes comparable to those units that are available to other residents. To the extent practicable, the number of bedrooms in low-income units must be

in the same proportion as the number of bedrooms in units within the entire development. The low-income units shall generally be distributed throughout the development and have substantially the same functionality as

the other units in the development;
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (e) Low-income housing units developed under an affordable housing incentive program shall be committed to continuing affordability for at least fifty years. A local government, however, may accept payments in lieu of

continuing affordability. The program shall include measures to enforce continuing affordability and income standards applicable to low-income units constructed under this section that may include, but are not limited to,

covenants, options, or other agreements to be executed and recorded by owners and developers;

 (f) Programs authorized under subsection (1) of this section may apply to part or all of a jurisdiction and different standards may be applied to different areas within a jurisdiction or to different types of development.

Programs authorized under this section may be modified to meet local needs and may include provisions not expressly provided in this section or RCW 82.02.020; 

 (g) Low-income housing units developed under an affordable housing incentive program are encouraged to be provided within developments for which a bonus or incentive is provided. However, programs may allow

units to be provided in a building located in the general area of the development for which a bonus or incentive is provided; and

 (h) Affordable housing incentive programs may allow a payment of money or property in lieu of low-income housing units if the jurisdiction determines that the payment achieves a result equal to or better than providing

the affordable housing on-site, as long as the payment does not exceed the approximate cost of developing the same number and quality of housing units that would otherwise be developed. Any city or county shall use

these funds or property to support the development of low-income housing, including support provided through loans or grants to public or private owners or developers of housing.

 (3) Affordable housing incentive programs enacted or expanded under this section may be applied within the jurisdiction to address the need for increased residential development, consistent with local growth

management and housing policies, as follows:

 (a) The jurisdiction shall identify certain land use designations within a geographic area where increased residential development will assist in achieving local growth management and housing policies;

 (b) The jurisdiction shall provide increased residential development capacity through zoning changes, bonus densities, height and bulk increases, parking reductions, or other regulatory changes or other incentives;

 (c) The jurisdiction shall determine that increased residential development capacity or other incentives can be achieved within the identified area, subject to consideration of other regulatory controls on development; and

 (d) The jurisdiction may establish a minimum amount of affordable housing that must be provided by all residential developments being built under the revised regulations, consistent with the requirements of this section.

[2009 c 80 § 1; 2006 c 149 § 2.]

Notes:

 Findings -- 2006 c 149: "The legislature finds that as new market-rate housing developments are constructed and housing costs rise, there is a significant and growing number of low-income

households that cannot afford market-rate housing in Washington state. The legislature finds that assistance to low-income households that cannot afford market-rate housing requires a broad variety

of tools to address this serious, statewide problem. The legislature further finds that absent any incentives to provide low-income housing, market conditions will result in housing developments in

many areas that lack units affordable to low-income households, circumstances that can cause adverse socioeconomic effects.

 The legislature encourages cities, towns, and counties to enact or expand affordable housing incentive programs, including density bonuses and other incentives, to increase the availability of lowincome housing for renter and owner occupancy that is located in largely market-rate housing developments throughout the community, consistent with local needs and adopted comprehensive plans.

While this act establishes minimum standards for those cities, towns, and counties choosing to implement or expand upon an affordable housing incentive program, cities, towns, and counties are

encouraged to enact programs that address local circumstances and conditions while simultaneously contributing to the statewide need for additional low-income housing." [2006 c 149 § 1.]

 Construction -- 2006 c 149: "The powers granted in this act are supplemental and additional to the powers otherwise held by local governments, and nothing in this act shall be construed as a

limit on such powers. The authority granted in this act shall extend to any affordable housing incentive program enacted or expanded prior to June 7, 2006, if the extension is adopted by the

applicable local government in an ordinance or resolution." [2006 c 149 § 4.]

36.70A.550

Aquifer conservation zones.

(1) Any city coterminous with, and comprised only of, an island that relies solely on groundwater aquifers for its potable water source and does not have reasonable access to a potable water source outside its jurisdiction

may designate one or more aquifer conservation zones.

 Aquifer conservation zones may only be designated for the purpose of conserving and protecting potable water sources.

 (2) Aquifer conservation zones may not be considered critical areas under this chapter except to the extent that specific areas located within aquifer conservation zones qualify for critical area designation and have been

designated as such under RCW 36.70A.060(2).

 (3) Any city may consider whether an area is within an aquifer conservation zone when determining the residential density of that particular area. The residential densities within conservation zones, in combination with

other densities of the city, must be sufficient to accommodate projected population growth under RCW 36.70A.110.

 (4) Nothing in this section may be construed to modify the population accommodation obligations required of jurisdictions under this chapter.

[2007 c 159 § 1.]

36.70A.560

Viability of agricultural lands — Deferral requirements — Definition. (Expires December 1, 2012.)

(1) For the period beginning May 1, 2007, and concluding July 1, 2011, counties and cities may not amend or adopt critical area ordinances under RCW 36.70A.060(2) as they specifically apply to agricultural activities.

Nothing in this section:

 (a) Nullifies critical area ordinances adopted by a county or city prior to May 1, 2007, to comply with RCW 36.70A.060(2);

 (b) Limits or otherwise modifies the obligations of a county or city to comply with the requirements of this chapter pertaining to critical areas not associated with agricultural activities; or

 (c) Limits the ability of a county or city to adopt or employ voluntary measures or programs to protect or enhance critical areas associated with agricultural activities.

 (2) Counties and cities subject to deferral requirements under subsection (1) of this section:

 (a) Should implement voluntary programs to enhance public resources and the viability of agriculture. Voluntary programs implemented under this subsection (2)(a) must include measures to evaluate the successes of

these programs; and

 (b) Must review and, if necessary, revise critical area ordinances as they specifically apply to agricultural activities to comply with the requirements of this chapter by December 1, 2012.

 (3) For purposes of this section and RCW 36.70A.5601, "agricultural activities" means agricultural uses and practices currently existing or legally allowed on rural land or agricultural land designated under RCW

36.70A.170 including, but not limited to: Producing, breeding, or increasing agricultural products; rotating and changing agricultural crops; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie fallow in which it is plowed and

tilled but left unseeded; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant as a result of adverse agricultural market conditions; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant because the land is enrolled

in a local, state, or federal conservation program, or the land is subject to a conservation easement; conducting agricultural operations; maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural equipment; maintaining, repairing,

and replacing agricultural facilities, when the replacement facility is no closer to a critical area than the original facility; and maintaining agricultural lands under production or cultivation.

[2010 c 203 § 1; 2007 c 353 § 2.]

Notes:

 Finding -- Intent -- 2007 c 353: "(1) The legislature finds that the goal of preserving Washington's agricultural lands is shared by citizens throughout the state. The legislature recognizes that
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

efforts to achieve a balance between the productive use of these resource lands and associated regulatory requirements have proven difficult, but that good faith efforts to seek solutions have yielded

successes. The legislature believes that this willingness to find and pursue common ground will enable Washingtonians to enjoy the benefits of a successful agricultural economy and a healthy

environment, while also preventing the unnecessary conversion of valuable agricultural lands.

 (2) The legislature, therefore, intends this act, the temporary delays it establishes for amending or adopting provisions of certain critical area ordinances, and the duties and requirements it

prescribes for the William D. Ruckelshaus Center, to be expressions of progress in resolving, harmonizing, and advancing commonly held environmental protection and agricultural viability goals.

 (3) The legislature fully expects the duties and requirements it is prescribing for the Ruckelshaus Center to be successful. If, however, the efforts of the center do not result in agreement on how

to best address the conflicts between agricultural activities and certain regulatory requirements as they apply to agricultural activities, the legislature intends, upon the expiration of the delay, to require

jurisdictions that have delayed amending or adopting certain regulatory measures to promptly complete all regulatory amendments or adoptions necessary to comply with the growth management act.

 (4) The legislature does not intend this act to reduce or otherwise diminish existing critical area ordinances that apply to agricultural activities during the deferral period established in RCW

36.70A.560." [2007 c 353 § 1.]

 Effective date -- 2007 c 353: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,

and takes effect immediately [May 8, 2007]." [2007 c 353 § 5.]

 Expiration date -- 2007 c 353: "This act expires December 1, 2012." [2010 c 203 § 3; 2007 c 353 § 6.]

36.70A.5601

Viability of agricultural lands — Ruckelshaus Center examination, report. (Expires December 1, 2012.)

(1) The William D. Ruckelshaus Center must conduct an examination of the conflicts between agricultural activities and critical area ordinances adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW. The examination required by this

section must commence by July 1, 2007.

 (2) In fulfilling the requirements of this section, the center must: (a) Work and consult with willing participants including, but not limited to, agricultural, environmental, tribal, and local government interests; and (b) involve

and apprise legislators and legislative staff of its efforts.

 (3) The examination conducted by the center must be completed in two distinct phases in accordance with the following:

 (a) In the first phase, the center must conduct fact-finding and stakeholder discussions with stakeholders identified in subsection (2) of this section. These discussions must identify stakeholder concerns, desired

outcomes, opportunities, and barriers. The fact-finding must identify existing regulatory, management, and scientific information related to agricultural activities and critical areas including, but not limited to: (i) Critical area

ordinances adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW; (ii) acreage enrolled in the conservation reserve enhancement program; (iii) acreage protected by conservation easements; (iv) buffer widths; (v) requirements of federally

approved salmon recovery plans; (vi) the impacts of agricultural activities on Puget Sound recovery efforts; and (vii) compliance with water quality requirements. The center must issue two reports of its fact-finding efforts

and stakeholder discussions to the governor and the appropriate committees of the house of representatives and the senate by December 1, 2007, and December 1, 2008; and

 (b)(i) In the second phase, the center must facilitate discussions between the stakeholders identified in subsection (2) of this section to identify policy and financial options or opportunities to address the issues and

desired outcomes identified by stakeholders in the first phase of the center's examination efforts.

 (ii) In particular, the stakeholders must examine innovative solutions including, but not limited to, outcome-based approaches that incorporate, to the maximum extent practicable, voluntary programs or approaches.

Additionally, stakeholders must examine ways to modify statutory provisions to ensure that regulatory constraints on agricultural activities are used as a last resort if desired outcomes are not achieved through voluntary

programs or approaches.

 (iii) The center must work to achieve agreement among participating stakeholders and to develop a coalition that can be used to support agreed upon changes or new approaches to protecting critical areas during the

2011 legislative session.

 (4) The center must issue a final report of findings and legislative recommendations to the governor and the appropriate committees of the house of representatives and the senate by September 1, 2010.

[2010 c 203 § 2; 2007 c 353 § 3.]

Notes:

 Finding -- Intent -- Effective date -- Expiration date -- 2007 c 353: See notes following RCW 36.70A.560.

36.70A.570

Regulation of forest practices.

(1) Each county, city, and town assuming regulation of forest practices as provided in RCW 76.09.240 (1) and (2) shall adopt development regulations that:

 (a) Protect public resources, as defined in RCW 76.09.020, from material damage or the potential for material damage;

 (b) Require appropriate approvals for all phases of the conversion of forest lands, including clearing and grading;

 (c) Are guided by the planning goals in RCW 36.70A.020 and by the purposes and policies of the forest practices act as set forth in RCW 76.09.010; and

 (d) Are consistent with or supplement development regulations that protect critical areas pursuant to RCW 36.70A.060.

 (2) If necessary, each county, city, or town that assumes regulation of forest practices under RCW 76.09.240 shall amend its comprehensive plan to ensure consistency between its comprehensive plan and development

regulations.

 (3) Before a county, city, or town may regulate forest practices under RCW 76.09.240 (1) and (2), it shall update its development regulations as required by RCW 36.70A.130 and, if applicable, RCW 36.70A.215. Forest

practices regulations adopted under RCW 76.09.240 (1) and (2) may be adopted as part of the legislative action taken under RCW 36.70A.130 or 36.70A.215.

[2007 c 236 § 2.]

36.70A.695

Development regulations — Jurisdictions specified — Electric vehicle infrastructure.

(1) By July 1, 2010, the development regulations of any jurisdiction:

 (a) Adjacent to Interstate 5, Interstate 90, Interstate 405, or state route number 520, with a population over twenty thousand, and located in a county with a population over one million five hundred thousand; or

 (b) Adjacent to Interstate 5 and located in a county with a population greater than six hundred thousand; or

 (c) Adjacent to Interstate 5 and located in a county with a state capitol within its borders;

planning under this chapter must allow electric vehicle infrastructure as a use in all areas except those zoned for residential or resource use or critical areas. A jurisdiction may adopt and apply other development

regulations that do not have the effect of precluding the siting of electric vehicle infrastructure in areas where that use is allowed.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (2) By July 1, 2011, or six months after the distribution required under RCW 43.31.970 occurs, whichever is later, the development regulations of any jurisdiction adjacent to Interstate 5, Interstate 90, Interstate 405, or

state route number 520 planning under this chapter must allow electric vehicle infrastructure as a use in all areas except those zoned for residential or resource use or critical areas. A jurisdiction may adopt and apply other

development regulations that do not have the effect of precluding the siting of electric vehicle infrastructure in areas where that use is allowed.

 (3) By July 1, 2011, or six months after the distribution required under RCW 43.31.970 occurs, whichever is later, the development regulations of any jurisdiction planning under this chapter must allow battery charging

stations as a use in all areas except those zoned for residential or resource use or critical areas. A jurisdiction may adopt and apply other development regulations that do not have the effect of precluding the siting of

electric vehicle infrastructure in areas where that use is allowed.

 (4) Cities are authorized to adopt incentive programs to encourage the retrofitting of existing structures with the electrical outlets capable of charging electric vehicles. Incentives may include bonus height, site coverage,

floor area ratio, and transferable development rights for use in urban growth areas.

 (5) The definitions in this subsection apply throughout this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

 (a) "Battery charging station" means an electrical component assembly or cluster of component assemblies designed specifically to charge batteries within electric vehicles, which meet or exceed any standards, codes,

and regulations set forth by chapter 19.28 RCW and consistent with rules adopted under RCW 19.27.540.

 (b) "Battery exchange station" means a fully automated facility that will enable an electric vehicle with a swappable battery to enter a drive lane and exchange the depleted battery with a fully charged battery through a

fully automated process, which meets or exceeds any standards, codes, and regulations set forth by chapter 19.28 RCW and consistent with rules adopted under RCW 19.27.540.

 (c) "Electric vehicle infrastructure" means structures, machinery, and equipment necessary and integral to support an electric vehicle, including battery charging stations, rapid charging stations, and battery exchange

stations.

 (d) "Rapid charging station" means an industrial grade electrical outlet that allows for faster recharging of electric vehicle batteries through higher power levels, which meets or exceeds any standards, codes, and

regulations set forth by chapter 19.28 RCW and consistent with rules adopted under RCW 19.27.540.

 (6) If federal funding for public investment in electric vehicles, electric vehicle infrastructure, or alternative fuel distribution infrastructure is not provided by February 1, 2010, subsection (1) of this section is null and void.

[2009 c 459 § 12.]

Notes:

 Finding -- Purpose -- 2009 c 459: See note following RCW 47.80.090.

Regional transportation planning organizations -- Electric vehicle infrastructure: RCW 47.80.090.

36.70A.700

Purpose — Intent — 2011 c 360.

(1) The purpose of chapter 360, Laws of 2011 is to establish the voluntary stewardship program as recommended in the report submitted by the William D. Ruckelshaus Center to the legislature as required by chapter 353,

Laws of 2007 and chapter 203, Laws of 2010.

 (2) It is the intent of chapter 360, Laws of 2011 to:

 (a) Promote plans to protect and enhance critical areas within the area where agricultural activities are conducted, while maintaining and improving the long-term viability of agriculture in the state of Washington and

reducing the conversion of farmland to other uses;

 (b) Focus and maximize voluntary incentive programs to encourage good riparian and ecosystem stewardship as an alternative to historic approaches used to protect critical areas;

 (c) Rely upon RCW 36.70A.060 for the protection of critical areas for those counties that do not choose to participate in this program;

 (d) Leverage existing resources by relying upon existing work and plans in counties and local watersheds, as well as existing state and federal programs to the maximum extent practicable to achieve program goals;

 (e) Encourage and foster a spirit of cooperation and partnership among county, tribal, environmental, and agricultural interests to better assure the program success;

 (f) Improve compliance with other laws designed to protect water quality and fish habitat; and

 (g) Rely upon voluntary stewardship practices as the primary method of protecting critical areas and not require the cessation of agricultural activities.

[2011 c 360 § 1.]

36.70A.702

Construction.

Nothing in RCW 36.70A.700 through 36.70A.760 may be construed to:

 (1) Interfere with or supplant the ability of any agricultural operator to work cooperatively with a conservation district or participate in state or federal conservation programs;

 (2) Require an agricultural operator to discontinue agricultural activities legally existing before July 22, 2011;

 (3) Prohibit the voluntary sale or leasing of land for conservation purposes, either in fee or as an easement;

 (4) Grant counties or state agencies additional authority to regulate critical areas on lands used for agricultural activities; and

 (5) Limit the authority of a state agency, local government, or landowner to carry out its obligations under any other federal, state, or local law.

[2011 c 360 § 15.]

36.70A.703

Definitions.

The definitions in this section apply to RCW 36.70A.700 through 36.70A.760 and RCW 36.70A.130 and 36.70A.280 unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

 (1) "Agricultural activities" means all agricultural uses and practices as defined in RCW 90.58.065.

 (2) "Commission" means the state conservation commission as defined in RCW 89.08.030.

 (3) "Director" means the executive director of the state conservation commission.

 (4) "Enhance" or "enhancement" means to improve the processes, structure, and functions existing, as of July 22, 2011, of ecosystems and habitats associated with critical areas.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (5) "Participating watershed" means a watershed identified by a county under RCW 36.70A.710(1) to participate in the program.

 (6) "Priority watershed" means a geographic area nominated by the county and designated by the commission.

 (7) "Program" means the voluntary stewardship program established in RCW 36.70A.705.

 (8) "Protect" or "protecting" means to prevent the degradation of functions and values existing as of July 22, 2011.

 (9) "Receipt of funding" means the date a county takes legislative action accepting any funds as required in RCW 36.70A.715(1) to implement the program.

 (10) "Statewide advisory committee" means the statewide advisory committee created in RCW 36.70A.745.

 (11) "Technical panel" means the directors or director designees of the following agencies: The department of fish and wildlife; the department of agriculture; the department of ecology; and the commission.

 (12) "Watershed" means a water resource inventory area, salmon recovery planning area, or a subbasin as determined by a county.

 (13) "Watershed group" means an entity designated by a county under the provisions of RCW 36.70A.715.

 (14) "Work plan" means a watershed work plan developed under the provisions of RCW 36.70A.720.

[2011 c 360 § 2.]

36.70A.705

Voluntary stewardship program established — Administered by commission — Agency participation.

(1) The voluntary stewardship program is established to be administered by the commission. The program shall be designed to protect and enhance critical areas on lands used for agricultural activities through voluntary

actions by agricultural operators.

 (2) In administering the program, the commission must:

 (a) Establish policies and procedures for implementing the program;

 (b) Administer funding for counties to implement the program including, but not limited to, funding to develop strategies and incentive programs and to establish local guidelines for watershed stewardship programs;

 (c) Administer the program's technical assistance funds and coordinate among state agencies and other entities for the implementation of the program;

 (d) Establish a technical panel;

 (e) In conjunction with the technical panel, review and evaluate: (i) Work plans submitted for approval under RCW 36.70A.720(2)(a); and (ii) reports submitted under RCW 36.70A.720(2)(b);

 (f) Review and evaluate the program's success and effectiveness and make appropriate changes to policies and procedures for implementing the program, in consultation with the statewide advisory committee and

other affected agencies;

 (g) Designate priority watersheds based upon the recommendation of the statewide advisory committee. The commission and the statewide advisory committee may only consider watersheds nominated by counties

under RCW 36.70A.710. When designating priority watersheds, the commission and the statewide advisory committee shall consider the statewide significance of the criteria listed in RCW 36.70A.710(3);

 (h) Provide administrative support for the program's statewide advisory committee in its work. The administrative support must be in collaboration with the department of ecology and other agencies involved in the

program;

 (i) Maintain a web site about the program that includes times, locations, and agenda information for meetings of the statewide advisory committee;

 (j) Report to the legislature on the general status of program implementation by December 1, 2013, and December 1, 2015;

 (k) In conjunction with the statewide advisory committee, conduct a review of the program beginning in 2017 and every five years thereafter, and report its findings to the legislature by December 1st; and

 (l) Report to the appropriate committees of the legislature in the format provided in RCW 43.01.036.

 (3) The department shall assist counties participating in the program to develop plans and development regulations under RCW 36.70A.735(1).

 (4) The commission, department, department of agriculture, department of fish and wildlife, department of ecology, and other state agencies as directed by the governor shall:

 (a) Cooperate and collaborate to implement the program; and

 (b) Develop materials to assist local watershed groups in development of work plans.

 (5) State agencies conducting new monitoring to implement the program in a watershed must focus on the goals and benchmarks of the work plan.

[2011 c 360 § 3.]

36.70A.710

Critical areas protection — Alternative to RCW 36.70A.060 — County's responsibilities — Procedures.

(1)(a) As an alternative to protecting critical areas in areas used for agricultural activities through development regulations adopted under RCW 36.70A.060, the legislative authority of a county may elect to protect such

critical areas through the program.

 (b) In order to participate in the program, within six months after July 22, 2011, the legislative authority of a county must adopt an ordinance or resolution that:

 (i) Elects to have the county participate in the program;

 (ii) Identifies the watersheds that will participate in the program; and

 (iii) Based on the criteria in subsection (4) of this section, nominates watersheds for consideration by the commission as state priority watersheds.

 (2) Before adopting the ordinance or resolution under subsection (1) of this section, the county must (a) confer with tribes, and environmental and agricultural interests; and (b) provide notice following the public

participation and notice provisions of RCW 36.70A.035 to property owners and other affected and interested individuals, tribes, government agencies, businesses, school districts, and organizations.

 (3) In identifying watersheds to participate in the program, a county must consider:

 (a) The role of farming within the watershed, including the number and acreage of farms, the economic value of crops and livestock, and the risk of the conversion of farmland;
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (b) The overall likelihood of completing a successful program in the watershed; and

 (c) Existing watershed programs, including those of other jurisdictions in which the watershed has territory.

 (4) In identifying priority watersheds, a county must consider the following:

 (a) The role of farming within the watershed, including the number and acreage of farms, the economic value of crops and livestock, and the risk of the conversion of farmland;

 (b) The importance of salmonid resources in the watershed;

 (c) An evaluation of the biological diversity of wildlife species and their habitats in the geographic region including their significance and vulnerability;

 (d) The presence of leadership within the watershed that is representative and inclusive of the interests in the watershed;

 (e) Integration of regional watershed strategies, including the availability of a data and scientific review structure related to all types of critical areas;

 (f) The presence of a local watershed group that is willing and capable of overseeing a successful program, and that has the operational structures to administer the program effectively, including professional technical

assistance staff, and monitoring and adaptive management structures; and

 (g) The overall likelihood of completing a successful program in the watershed.

 (5) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (9) of this section, beginning with the effective date of the ordinance or resolution adopted under subsection (1) of this section, the program applies to all unincorporated

property upon which agricultural activities occur within a participating watershed.

 (6)(a) Except as otherwise provided in (b) of this subsection, within two years after July 22, 2011, a county must review and, if necessary, revise development regulations adopted under this chapter to protect critical

areas as they specifically apply to agricultural activities:

 (i) If the county has not elected to participate in the program, for all unincorporated areas; or

 (ii) If the county has elected to participate in the program, for any watershed not participating in the program.

 (b) A county that between July 1, 2003, and June 30, 2007, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.130 completed the review of its development regulations as required by RCW 36.70A.130 to protect critical areas as they

specifically apply to agricultural activities is not required to review and revise its development regulations until required by RCW 36.70A.130.

 (c) After the review and amendment required under (a) of this subsection, RCW 36.70A.130 applies to the subsequent review and amendment of development regulations adopted under this chapter to protect critical

areas as they specifically apply to agricultural activities.

 (7)(a) A county that has made the election under subsection (1) of this section may withdraw a participating watershed from the program by adopting an ordinance or resolution withdrawing the watershed from the

program. A county may withdraw a watershed from the program at the end of three years, five years, or eight years after receipt of funding, or any time after ten years from receipt of funding.

 (b) Within eighteen months after withdrawing a participating watershed from the program, the county must review and, if necessary, revise its development regulations that protect critical areas in that watershed as they

specifically apply to agricultural activities. The development regulations must protect the critical area functions and values as they existed on July 22, 2011. RCW 36.70A.130 applies to the subsequent review and

amendment of development regulations adopted under this chapter to protect critical areas as they specifically apply to agricultural activities. 

 (8) A county that has made the election under subsection (1) of this section is eligible for a share of the funding made available to implement the program, subject to funding availability from the state.

 (9) A county that has made the election under subsection (1) of this section is not required to implement the program in a participating watershed until adequate funding for the program in that watershed is provided to

the county.

[2011 c 360 § 4.]

36.70A.715

Funding by commission — County's duties — Watershed group established.

(1) When the commission makes funds available to a county that has made the election provided in RCW 36.70A.710(1), the county must within sixty days:

 (a) Acknowledge the receipt of funds; and

 (b) Designate a watershed group and an entity to administer funds for each watershed for which funding has been provided.

 (2) A county must confer with tribes and interested stakeholders before designating or establishing a watershed group.

 (3) The watershed group must include broad representation of key watershed stakeholders and, at a minimum, representatives of agricultural and environmental groups and tribes that agree to participate. The county

should encourage existing lead entities, watershed planning units, or other integrating organizations to serve as the watershed group.

 (4) The county may designate itself, a tribe, or another entity to coordinate the local watershed group.

[2011 c 360 § 5.]

36.70A.720

Watershed group's duties — Work plan — Conditional priority funding.

(1) A watershed group designated by a county under RCW 36.70A.715 must develop a work plan to protect critical areas while maintaining the viability of agriculture in the watershed. The work plan must include goals and

benchmarks for the protection and enhancement of critical areas. In developing and implementing the work plan, the watershed group must:

 (a) Review and incorporate applicable water quality, watershed management, farmland protection, and species recovery data and plans;

 (b) Seek input from tribes, agencies, and stakeholders;

 (c) Develop goals for participation by agricultural operators conducting commercial and noncommercial agricultural activities in the watershed necessary to meet the protection and enhancement benchmarks of the work

plan;

 (d) Ensure outreach and technical assistance is provided to agricultural operators in the watershed;

 (e) Create measurable benchmarks that, within ten years after the receipt of funding, are designed to result in (i) the protection of critical area functions and values and (ii) the enhancement of critical area functions and

values through voluntary, incentive-based measures;

 (f) Designate the entity or entities that will provide technical assistance;

 (g) Work with the entity providing technical assistance to ensure that individual stewardship plans contribute to the goals and benchmarks of the work plan;
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (h) Incorporate into the work plan any existing development regulations relied upon to achieve the goals and benchmarks for protection;

 (i) Establish baseline monitoring for: (i) Participation activities and implementation of the voluntary stewardship plans and projects; (ii) stewardship activities; and (iii) the effects on critical areas and agriculture relevant to

the protection and enhancement benchmarks developed for the watershed;

 (j) Conduct periodic evaluations, institute adaptive management, and provide a written report of the status of plans and accomplishments to the county and to the commission within sixty days after the end of each

biennium;

 (k) Assist state agencies in their monitoring programs; and

 (l) Satisfy any other reporting requirements of the program.

 (2)(a) The watershed group shall develop and submit the work plan to the director for approval as provided in RCW 36.70A.725.

 (b)(i) Not later than five years after the receipt of funding for a participating watershed, the watershed group must report to the director and the county on whether it has met the work plan's protection and enhancement

goals and benchmarks.

 (ii) If the watershed group determines the protection goals and benchmarks have been met, and the director concurs under RCW 36.70A.730, the watershed group shall continue to implement the work plan.

 (iii) If the watershed group determines the protection goals and benchmarks have not been met, it must propose and submit to the director an adaptive management plan to achieve the goals and benchmarks that were

not met. If the director does not approve the adaptive management plan under RCW 36.70A.730, the watershed is subject to RCW 36.70A.735.

 (iv) If the watershed group determines the enhancement goals and benchmarks have not been met, the watershed group must determine what additional voluntary actions are needed to meet the benchmarks, identify

the funding necessary to implement these actions, and implement these actions when funding is provided.

 (c)(i) Not later than ten years after receipt of funding for a participating watershed, and every five years thereafter, the watershed group must report to the director and the county on whether it has met the protection and

enhancement goals and benchmarks of the work plan.

 (ii) If the watershed group determines the protection goals and benchmarks have been met, and the director concurs under RCW 36.70A.730, the watershed group shall continue to implement the work plan.

 (iii) If the watershed group determines the protection goals and benchmarks have not been met, the watershed is subject to RCW 36.70A.735.

 (iv) If the watershed group determines the enhancement goals and benchmarks have not been met, the watershed group must determine what additional voluntary actions are needed to meet the benchmarks, identify

the funding necessary to implement these actions, and implement these actions when funding is provided.

 (3) Following approval of a work plan, a county or watershed group may request a state or federal agency to focus existing enforcement authority in that participating watershed, if the action will facilitate progress toward

achieving work plan protection goals and benchmarks.

 (4) The commission may provide priority funding to any watershed designated under the provisions of RCW 36.70A.705(2)(g). The director, in consultation with the statewide advisory committee, shall work with the

watershed group to develop an accelerated implementation schedule for watersheds that receive priority funding.

 (5) Commercial and noncommercial agricultural operators participating in the program are eligible to receive funding and assistance under watershed programs.

[2011 c 360 § 6.]

36.70A.725

Technical review of work plan — Time frame for action by director.

(1) Upon receipt of a work plan submitted to the director under RCW 36.70A.720(2)(a), the director must submit the work plan to the technical panel for review.

 (2) The technical panel shall review the work plan and report to the director within forty-five days after the director receives the work plan. The technical panel shall assess whether at the end of ten years after receipt of

funding, the work plan, in conjunction with other existing plans and regulations, will protect critical areas while maintaining and enhancing the viability of agriculture in the watershed.

 (3)(a) If the technical panel determines the proposed work plan will protect critical areas while maintaining and enhancing the viability of agriculture in the watershed:

 (i) It must recommend approval of the work plan; and

 (ii) The director must approve the work plan.

 (b) If the technical panel determines the proposed work plan will not protect critical areas while maintaining and enhancing the viability of agriculture in the watershed:

 (i) It must identify the reasons for its determination; and

 (ii) The director must advise the watershed group of the reasons for disapproval.

 (4) The watershed group may modify and resubmit its work plan for review and approval consistent with this section.

 (5) If the director does not approve a work plan submitted under this section within two years and nine months after receipt of funding, the director shall submit the work plan to the statewide advisory committee for

resolution. If the statewide advisory committee recommends approval, the director must approve the work plan.

 (6) If the director does not approve a work plan for a watershed within three years after receipt of funding, the provisions of RCW 36.70A.735(2) apply to the watershed.

[2011 c 360 § 7.]

36.70A.730

Report by watershed group — Director consults with statewide advisory committee.

(1) Upon receipt of a report by a watershed group under RCW 36.70A.720(2)(b) that the work plan goals and benchmarks have been met, the director must consult with the statewide advisory committee. If the director

concurs with the watershed group report, the watershed group shall continue to implement the work plan. If the director does not concur with the watershed group report, the director shall consult with the statewide advisory

committee following the procedures in subsection (2) of this section.

 (2) If either the director, following receipt of a report under subsection (1) of this section, or the watershed group, in the report submitted to the director under RCW 36.70A.720(2)(b), concludes that the work plan goals

and benchmarks for protection have not been met, the director must consult with the statewide advisory committee for a recommendation on how to proceed. If the director, acting upon recommendation from the statewide

advisory committee, determines that the watershed is likely to meet the goals and benchmarks with an additional six months of planning and implementation time, the director must grant an extension. If the director, acting

upon a recommendation from the statewide advisory committee, determines that the watershed is unlikely to meet the goals and benchmarks within six months, the watershed is subject to RCW 36.70A.735.

 (3) A watershed that fails to meet its goals and benchmarks for protection within the six-month time extension under subsection (2) of this section is subject to RCW 36.70A.735.

[2011 c 360 § 8.]
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

36.70A.735

When work plan is not approved, fails, or is unfunded — County's duties — Rules.

(1) Within eighteen months after one of the events in subsection (2) of this section, a county must:

 (a) Develop, adopt, and implement a watershed work plan approved by the department that protects critical areas in areas used for agricultural activities while maintaining the viability of agriculture in the watershed. The

department shall consult with the departments of agriculture, ecology, and fish and wildlife and the commission, and other relevant state agencies before approving or disapproving the proposed work plan. The appeal of

the department's decision under this subsection is subject to appeal under RCW 36.70A.280;

 (b) Adopt development regulations previously adopted under this chapter by another local government for the purpose of protecting critical areas in areas used for agricultural activities. Regulations adopted under this

subsection (1)(b) must be from a region with similar agricultural activities, geography, and geology and must: (i) Be from Clallam, Clark, King, or Whatcom counties; or (ii) have been upheld by a growth management

hearings board or court after July 1, 2011, where the board or court determined that the provisions adequately protected critical areas functions and values in areas used for agricultural activities;

 (c) Adopt development regulations certified by the department as protective of critical areas in areas used for agricultural activities as required by this chapter. The county may submit existing or amended regulations for

certification. The department must make its decision on whether to certify the development regulations within ninety days after the county submits its request. If the department denies the certification, the county shall take

an action under (a), (b), or (d) of this subsection. The department must consult with the departments of agriculture, ecology, and fish and wildlife and the commission before making a certification under this section. The

appeal of the department's decision under this subsection (1)(c) is subject to appeal under RCW 36.70A.280; or

 (d) Review and, if necessary, revise development regulations adopted under this chapter to protect critical areas as they relate to agricultural activities.

 (2) A participating watershed is subject to this section if:

 (a) The work plan is not approved by the director as provided in RCW 36.70A.725;

 (b) The work plan's goals and benchmarks for protection have not been met as provided in RCW 36.70A.720;

 (c) The commission has determined under RCW 36.70A.740 that the county, department, commission, or departments of agriculture, ecology, or fish and wildlife have not received adequate funding to implement a

program in the watershed; or

 (d) The commission has determined under RCW 36.70A.740 that the watershed has not received adequate funding to implement the program.

 (3) The department shall adopt rules to implement subsection (1)(a) and (c) of this section.

[2011 c 360 § 9.]

36.70A.740

Commission's duties — Timelines.

(1) By July 31, 2015, the commission must:

 (a) In consultation with each county that has elected under RCW 36.70A.710 to participate in the program, determine which participating watersheds received adequate funding to establish and implement the program in

a participating watershed by July 1, 2015; and

 (b) In consultation with other state agencies, for each participating watershed determine whether state agencies required to take action under the provisions of RCW 36.70A.700 through 36.70A.760 have received

adequate funding to support the program by July 1, 2015.

 (2) By July 31, 2017, and every two years thereafter, in consultation with each county that has elected under RCW 36.70A.710 to participate in the program and other state agencies, the commission shall determine for

each participating watershed whether adequate funding to implement the program was provided during the preceding biennium as provided in subsection (1) of this section.

 (3) If the commission determines under subsection (1) or (2) of this section that a participating watershed has not received adequate funding, the watershed is subject to the provisions of RCW 36.70A.735.

 (4) In consultation with the statewide advisory committee and other state agencies, not later than August 31, 2015, and each August 31st every two years thereafter, the commission shall report to the legislature and

each county that has elected under RCW 36.70A.710 to participate in the program on the participating watersheds that have received adequate funding to establish and implement the program.

[2011 c 360 § 10.]

36.70A.745

Statewide advisory committee — Membership.

(1)(a) From the nominations made under (b) of this subsection, the commission shall appoint a statewide advisory committee, consisting of: Two persons representing county government, two persons representing

agricultural organizations, and two persons representing environmental organizations. The commission, in conjunction with the governor's office, shall also invite participation by two representatives of tribal governments.

 (b) Organizations representing county, agricultural, and environmental organizations shall submit nominations of their representatives to the commission within ninety days of July 22, 2011. Members of the statewide

advisory committee shall serve two-year terms except that for the first year, one representative from each of the sectors shall be appointed to the statewide advisory committee for a term of one year. Members may be

reappointed by the commission for additional two-year terms and replacement members shall be appointed in accordance with the process for selection of the initial members of the statewide advisory committee.

 (c) Upon notification of the commission by an appointed member, the appointed member may designate a person to serve as an alternate.

 (d) The executive director of the commission shall serve as a nonvoting chair of the statewide advisory committee.

 (e) Members of the statewide advisory committee shall serve without compensation and, unless serving as a state officer or employee, are not eligible for reimbursement for subsistence, lodging, and travel expenses

under RCW 43.03.050 and 43.03.060.

 (2) The role of the statewide advisory committee is to advise the commission and other agencies involved in development and operation of the program.

[2011 c 360 § 11.]

36.70A.750

Agricultural operators — Individual stewardship plan.

(1) Agricultural operators implementing an individual stewardship plan consistent with a work plan are presumed to be working toward the protection and enhancement of critical areas.

 (2) If the watershed group determines that additional or different practices are needed to achieve the work plan's goals and benchmarks, the agricultural operator may not be required to implement those practices but

may choose to implement the revised practices on a voluntary basis and is eligible for funding to revise the practices.

[2011 c 360 § 12.]
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

36.70A.755

Implementing the work plan.

In developing stewardship practices to implement the work plan, to the maximum extent practical the watershed group should:

 (1) Avoid management practices that may have unintended adverse consequences for other habitats, species, and critical areas functions and values; and

 (2) Administer the program in a manner that allows participants to be eligible for public or private environmental protection and enhancement incentives while protecting and enhancing critical area functions and values.

[2011 c 360 § 13.]

36.70A.760

Agricultural operators — Withdrawal from program.

An agricultural operator participating in the program may withdraw from the program and is not required to continue voluntary measures after the expiration of an applicable contract. The watershed group must account for

any loss of protection resulting from withdrawals when establishing goals and benchmarks for protection and a work plan under RCW 36.70A.720.

[2011 c 360 § 14.]

36.70A.800

Role of growth strategies commission.

The growth strategies commission created by executive order shall:

 (1) Analyze different methods for assuring that county and city comprehensive plans adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW are consistent with the planning goals under RCW 36.70A.020 and with other requirements of

chapter 36.70A RCW;

 (2) Recommend to the legislature and the governor by October 1, 1990, a specific structure or process that, among other things:

 (a) Ensures county and city comprehensive plans adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW are coordinated and comply with planning goals and other requirements under chapter 36.70A RCW;

 (b) Requires state agencies to comply with this chapter and to consider and be consistent with county and city comprehensive plans in actions by state agencies, including the location, financing, and expansion of

transportation systems and other public facilities;

 (c) Defines the state role in growth management;

 (d) Addresses lands and resources of statewide significance, including to:

 (i) Protect these lands and resources of statewide significance by developing standards for their preservation and protection and suggesting the appropriate structure to monitor and enforce the preservation of these

lands and resources; and

 (ii) Consider the environmental, economic, and social values of the lands and resources with statewide significance;

 (e) Identifies potential state funds that may be withheld and incentives that promote county and city compliance with chapter 36.70A RCW;

 (f) Increases affordable housing statewide and promotes linkages between land use and transportation;

 (g) Addresses vesting of rights; and

 (h) Addresses short subdivisions; and

 (3) Develop recommendations to provide for the resolution of disputes over urban growth areas between counties and cities, including incorporations and annexations.

[1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 86.]

36.70A.900

Severability — 1990 1st ex.s. c 17.

If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.

[1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 88.]

36.70A.901

Part, section headings not law — 1990 1st ex.s. c 17.

Part and section headings as used in this act do not constitute any part of the law.

[1990 1st ex.s. c 17 § 89.]

36.70A.902

Section headings not law — 1991 sp.s. c 32.

Section headings as used in this act do not constitute any part of the law.

[1991 sp.s. c 32 § 40.]

36.70A.903

Transfer of powers, duties, and functions.

(1) The powers, duties, and functions of the growth management hearings board are hereby transferred to the environmental and land use hearings office.
Chapter 36.70A RCW: GROWTH MANAGEMENT — PLANNING BY SELECTED COUNTIES AND CITIES

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A&full=true[11/26/2012 12:40:26 PM]

 (2)(a) All reports, documents, surveys, books, records, files, papers, or written material in the possession of the growth management hearings board shall be delivered to the custody of the environmental and land use

hearings office. All cabinets, furniture, office equipment, motor vehicles, and other tangible property employed by the growth management hearings board shall be made available to the environmental and land use

hearings office. All funds, credits, or other assets held by the growth management hearings board shall be assigned to the environmental and land use hearings office.

 (b) Any appropriations made to the growth management hearings board shall, on July 1, 2011, be transferred and credited to the environmental and land use hearings office.

 (c) If any question arises as to the transfer of any personnel, funds, books, documents, records, papers, files, equipment, or other tangible property used or held in the exercise of the powers and the performance of the

duties and functions transferred, the director of financial management shall make a determination as to the proper allocation and certify the same to the state agencies concerned.

 (3) All employees of the growth management hearings board are transferred to the jurisdiction of the environmental and land use hearings office. All employees classified under chapter 41.06 RCW, the state civil service

law, are assigned to the environmental and land use hearings office to perform their usual duties upon the same terms as formerly, without any loss of rights, subject to any action that may be appropriate thereafter in

accordance with the laws and rules governing state civil service.

 (4) All existing rules and all pending cases before the growth management hearings board shall be continued and acted upon by the growth management hearings board located within the environmental and land use

hearings office. All pending business, existing contracts, and obligations shall remain in full force and shall be performed by the environmental and land use hearings office.

 (5) The transfer of the powers, duties, functions, and personnel of the growth management hearings board shall not affect the validity of any act performed before July 1, 2011.

 (6) If apportionments of budgeted funds are required because of the transfers directed by this section, the director of financial management shall certify the apportionments to the agencies affected, the state auditor, and

the state treasurer. Each of these shall make the appropriate transfer and adjustments in funds and appropriation accounts and equipment records in accordance with the certification.

[2010 c 210 § 43.]

Notes:

 Intent -- Effective dates -- Application -- Pending cases and rules -- 2010 c 210: See notes following RCW 43.21B.001.

36.70A.904

Conflict with federal requirements — 2011 c 360.

If any part of this act is found to be in conflict with federal requirements that are a prescribed condition to the allocation of federal funds to the state, the conflicting part of this act is inoperative solely to the extent of the

conflict and with respect to the agencies directly affected, and this finding does not affect the operation of the remainder of this act in its application to the agencies concerned. Rules adopted under this act must meet

federal requirements that are a necessary condition to the receipt of federal funds by the state.

[2011 c 360 § 21.]