alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 24.6

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and
each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

                                                  /s/  Boone Powell, Jr.
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Boone Powell, Jr.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, John G. Meyer, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of The Allied Defense Group,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 10, 2004 /s/ John G. Meyer, Jr.  John G. Meyer, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President
**EXHIBIT11.1**

**DUKEREALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP**

**EARNINGSTO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION**

**(inthousands)**

 
|                                                     |   | **DECEMBER 31,** |    |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------|---------|
|                                                     |   | **2001**         |    |
| Consolidated net income  available for common units |   | $                | 262,430 |   |
| Dividends on preferred shares                            |   | 60,850           |    |
| Gain on land and depreciated  property sales             |   | (45,708          | )       |
| Interest expense                                         |   | 113,830          |    |
| earnings before fixed charges                            |   | $                | 391,402 |   |
|                                                     |   |             |    |
| Interest expense                                         |   | $                | 113,830 |   |
| Dividends on preferred shares                            |   | 60,850           |    |
| Interest costs capitalized                               |   | 25,859           |    |
| total fixed charges                                      |   | $                | 200,539 |   |
|                                                     |   |             |    |
| **Fixed charge ratio**                                   |   | **1.95**         |    |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
American Financial Corporation 10-Q for the six months ended June 30,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                        $360,603
<SECURITIES>                                10,874,080<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  676,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,348,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        470,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    162,760
<COMMON>                                         9,625
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,272,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,348,212
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,933,171
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               163,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                191,708
<INCOME-TAX>                                    69,004
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            122,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (78)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   122,626
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Includes an investment in investees of $234 million.
<F2>Not applicable since all common shares are owned by American Financial
Group.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis D. Oklak,Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|        | /s/                                   | Dennis D. Oklak |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|-----------------|--------|
|   | Dennis D. Oklak                       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer of the        |
|   |                                  | General Partner |
|   | Date:   March 12, 2007 |
|        |                                       |                 |        |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Duke RealtyLimited Partnership, and will be retained by Duke Realty Limited Partnershipand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
Case 1:22-cv-24066-KMM   Document 170-25   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2024   Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-07461 and No. 333-22243) of DeltaPoint, Inc. of
our report dated January 27, 1997, except for the first paragraph of Note 11
which is as of February 26, 1997 and the second paragraphs of Note 1 and Note 11
which are as of March 25, 1997, which appears on page 26 in this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB.
 
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
San Jose, California
March 25, 1997
§ 102-73.290 Are there any prohibitions when a Federal agency pays “just compensation” to a tenant? Yes, Federal agencies must not— ( a ) Duplicate any payment to the tenant otherwise authorized by law; and
( b ) Pay a tenant unless the landowner disclaims all interests in the tenant's improvements. In consideration for any such payment, the tenant must assign, transfer, and release to the Federal agency all of its right, title, and interest in the improvements. The tenant may reject such payment under this subpart and obtain payment for its property interests according to other sections of applicable law.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 91-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/28/2023   Page 1 of 1
§ 102-73.200 What types of special purpose space may the Department of the Interior lease? The Department of the Interior is delegated authority to lease the following types of special purpose space: ( a ) Space in buildings and land incidental thereto used by field crews of the Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Land Management, and the Geological Survey in areas where no other Government agencies are quartered (unimproved land may be leased only on a fiscal year basis).
( b ) National Parks/Monuments Visitors Centers consisting primarily of special purpose space (e.g., visitor reception, information, and rest room facilities) and not general office or administrative space.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 585 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 585

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the work 
        opportunity credit against the alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

 Mr. English introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the work 
        opportunity credit against the alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT ALLOWED AGAINST MINIMUM TAX.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 38 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation based on amount of tax) is 
amended by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4) and by 
inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Special rules for work opportunity credit.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of the work 
                opportunity credit--
                            ``(i) this section and section 39 shall be 
                        applied separately with respect to the credit, 
                        and
                            ``(ii) in applying paragraph (1) to the 
                        credit--
                                    ``(I) subparagraph (A) shall not 
                                apply, and
                                    ``(II) the limitation under 
                                paragraph (1) (as modified by subclause 
                                (I)) shall be reduced by the credit 
                                allowed under subsection (a) for the 
                                taxable year (other than the work 
                                opportunity credit).
                    ``(B) Work opportunity credit.--For purposes of 
                this subsection, the term `work opportunity credit' 
                means the credit allowable under subsection (a) by 
                reason of section 51(a).''
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subclause (II) of section 
38(c)(2)(A)(ii) of such Code is amended by inserting ``or the work 
opportunity credit'' after ``employment credit''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.3

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ITS Networks Inc.
(the  "Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  President  and  Principal  Accounting  and Financial Officer of the
Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January  30,  2004


                                    /s/  Gustavo  Gomez
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Gustavo  Gomez
                                         Chief  Executive  Officer,
                                         President  and  Treasurer

                                    /s/  Herman  de  Haas
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Hermand  de  Haas
                                         Executive  Vice  President,  Chief
                                         Operating Officer  and
                                         Principal  Accounting  and  Financial
                                         Officer
#### §§ 97.211-97.299 [Reserved]
Evidence & Impact 

Webinar Series 

2023-2024 

Celebrating Service and Its Evidence Story 

About the 2023-2024 Webinar Series 

The six-webinar series hosted by the AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation will focus on 

evidence and impact with partners in the field, within the agency, and leaders in communities and 

the nation. Register, participate and celebrate AmeriCorps’ 30th Anniversary of harnessing the 

transformative value of evidence use to strengthen community-based organization practices, 

members and volunteers, local impact, and public trust. This showcase year will highlight 

AmeriCorps’ evidence journey and the evidence use movement sparked through the Evidence 

Act. Webinars will share how AmeriCorps not only supports research, evidence and evaluation 

capacity building that strengthens the local nonprofit missions to problem solve and tackle 

community inspired change, but also shows return in taxpayer dollars saved to local, state, and 

national budgets and sparks our nation’s civic engagement. 

Learning Objectives this Webinar Season will: 

1. Describe the transformative impact AmeriCorps has on communities incorporating local 

voice. 

2. Share how evidence readiness strengthens community-based organization practices, local 

impact, and public trust. 

3. Provide the vision of AmeriCorps evidence-building as thought-leaders on National Service. 

The Webinar Line-up 

Webinar Themes Month/Year 

The State of the Evidence September 2023 

Best Practices for Equitable Data Use October 2023 

AmeriCorps Return on Investment Studies December 2023 

AmeriCorps – Building a Healthy Future February 2024 

Putting Civic Engagement in Context March 2024 

Bridging Generational Divides through Education June/July 2024 

Registration information for AmeriCorps Evidence & Impact Webinars will be available in 

advance at Our Impact: Evidence Webinars 

Produced and published at US taxpayer expense.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Alpine Group, Inc. (the "Company") for
the three months ended June 30, 2003 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Steven S. Elbaum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 14, 2003 |  | /s/STEVEN S. ELBAUMSteven S. Elbaum Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 22-23871-CIV-MARTINEZ-BECERRA

MODEL ME KIDS, LLC, 

Plaintiff,

v.

MODEL-ME-KIDS, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement, which 

informs the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in this matter. (ECF No. 17). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that 

1. The parties shall file either a Notice of Dismissal (if the Defendant has not served 

an answer or motion for summary judgment) or a Stipulation of Dismissal (signed by all parties 

who have appeared in this action), which must be filed with the Clerk of the Court; a proposed 

Order of Dismissal or Final Judgment; and any other documents necessary to conclude this action

on or before February 28, 2023. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1280 

(11th Cir. 2012).

2. If the parties fail to comply with this Order, the Court shall dismissthis case without 

prejudice and without any further warning. 

3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to DENY ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT.

4. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case for statistical purposes 

only. This shall not affect the substantive rights of the parties. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 30th day of January, 2023.

____________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

Magistrate Judge Becerra

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

DEC 17 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

RICHARD JOHN INGRAM,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-6248

(D.C. No. CIV-97-947-R)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRORBY , BRISCOE , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Petitioner Richard John Ingram seeks to appeal from the district court’s

denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court denied the § 2255 motion as untimely filed,

applying United States v. Simmonds , 111 F.3d 737 (10th Cir. 1997). The district

court also denied petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability, required by

28 U.S.C. § 2253 before this court can consider his appeal. Petitioner reurges his

request before this court. 

After careful consideration of petitioner’s arguments on appeal, we

conclude that he has not made a substantial showing that the district court’s

decision denied him a constitutional right. See id. Accordingly, petitioner’s

request for a certificate of appealability is denied, and this appeal is dismissed. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith. 

Entered for the Court

Wade Brorby

Circuit Judge
#### § 102-37.430 What property can a SASP make available to a donee with conditional eligibility?

You may only make available surplus property that the donee can use immediately. You may not make available property that will only be used at a later date, for example, after the construction of the donee's facility has been completed. If property is provided to the donee with conditional eligibility, and the conditional eligibility lapses (see § 102-37.420), the property must be returned to the SASP for redistribution or disposal.

[67 FR 2584, Jan. 18, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 64514, Oct. 30, 2014]