alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis D.Oklak, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership. 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, and will be retained by Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 102-73.215 What types of special purpose space may the Department of Transportation lease? The Department of Transportation is delegated authority to lease the following types of special purpose space (or real property): ( a ) Land for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) at airports (unimproved land may be leased only on a fiscal year basis).
( b ) General purpose office space not exceeding 10,000 square feet for the FAA at airports in buildings under the jurisdiction of public or private airport authorities (lease terms, including all options, limited to 5 years).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                      ***RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE***   
                      --------------------------------------
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STSTEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0000003941
<NAME>                    ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997    
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.000
<CASH>                                          1,168
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  75,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                      680
<INVENTORY>                                    61,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              152,172
<PP&E>                                         94,698
<DEPRECIATION>                                 51,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                203,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         101,468
<BONDS>                                           393
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           94
<OTHER-SE>                                     92,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  203,051
<SALES>                                       149,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              149,783
<CGS>                                         112,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 112,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   76
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                17,773
<INCOME-TAX>                                    6,396
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,377
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,377
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .91
        



</TABLE>
#### § 102-118.220 If a transportation debt is owed to my agency by a TSP because of loss or damage to property, does my agency report it to GSA?

No, if your agency has administratively determined that a TSP owes a debt resulting from loss or damage, follow your agency regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   36,751
<RECEIVABLES>                                  177,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,782
<INVENTORY>                                    134,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               540,201
<PP&E>                                         520,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                 306,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,400,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          451,866
<BONDS>                                        641,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    46,941
<COMMON>                                       2,548
<OTHER-SE>                                     154,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,400,323
<SALES>                                        278,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               302,839
<CGS>                                          265,354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  277,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               35,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,856)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,287)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,570)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,750)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5354

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

7 Commercial Street in Newport, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Bruce F. Cotta

Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 7 Commercial Street in Newport, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Bruce F. Cotta Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BRUCE F. COTTA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

5 Postal Service located at 7 Commercial Street in Newport,

6 Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Bruce F. Cotta Post Office Building’’.

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United
2

•HR 5354 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Bruce F. Cotta Post

3 Office Building.

Æ
§ 102-76.35 What is the purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA)? The purpose of NEPA is to— ( a ) Declare a national policy which will encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment;
( b ) Promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and biosphere and stimulate the health and welfare of man;
( c ) Enrich the understanding of the ecological systems and natural resources important to the Nation; and
( d ) Establish a Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).
Exhibit 4.43


 


Summary
of the Rural Partnership Agreement, entered into on June 13, 2019, in connection with Fazenda Jataí II


 


Parties:
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, as the company interested in entering into a rural partnership
with Maria Conceição Carvalho de Rezende, and Maria Conceição Carvalho de Rezende, as the owner of
the land.


 


Purpose:  Granting
of the possession, for a five-year term, of a total area equivalent to 364.20 useful hectares of Fazenda Jataí II for purposes
of the exploitation of the land under a rural partnership regime, by means of the sharing, by and among the parties, of the earnings
received from the crops/harvests arising from the aforementioned partnership. Maria Conceição Carvalho de Rezende
shall be entitled to approximately 17% of the earnings therefrom (set at an average of 11,36 bags of soybean per hectare), and
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas shall be entitled to the remaining 83%.
#### § 102-75.1230 How long does an agency have to indicate its interest in the property?

Generally, agencies have 30 days to express written interest in the property. However, sometimes GSA has cause to conduct an expedited screening of the real property and the time allotted for responding is less than 30 days. The Notice of Availability always contains a “respond by” date.
#### §§ 102-74.215-102-74.225 [Reserved]
§ 102-40.190 How do we handle medical devices? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67867 , Aug. 22, 2024.
( a ) Medical devices are subject to the laws and regulations administered by FDA. Provisions of the governing statute, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, appear in 21 U.S.C. 301, *et seq.* FDA regulations covering medical devices are found in 21 CFR chapter I, subpart H. The Act prohibits the movement in interstate commerce of medical devices that are adulterated or misbranded (21 U.S.C. 331). The Act authorizes FDA to initiate civil proceedings to seize or enjoin the distribution of such items (21 U.S.C. 334), and to report any violations to a U.S. Attorney for prosecution, after such individual is given notice and a hearing (21 U.S.C. 335).
( b ) Prescription devices are subject to additional Federal, state, local, and other applicable laws. Federal law requires that prescription devices be in the possession of either: Persons lawfully engaged in the manufacture, transportation, storage, or wholesale or retail distribution of such device; or, practitioners licensed by their states. Federal law also requires that prescription devices be sold only to, or on the prescription or order of, a licensed practitioner for use in the course of his or her professional practice, and that the devices are labeled in a specific manner.
( c ) Non-Federal recipients must certify in writing that such property will be used, resold or transported in conformance with FDA regulations. Any proposed destruction of medical equipment must be coordinated with local health and sanitation officials.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCharacteristic vector analysis of inflection ratio spectra:  New technique for analysis of ocean color dataCharacteristic vector analysis applied to inflection ratio spectra is a new approach to analyzing spectral data. The technique applied to remote data collected with the multichannel ocean color sensor (MOCS), a passive sensor, simultaneously maps the distribution of two different phytopigments, chlorophyll alpha and phycoerythrin, the ocean. The data set presented is from a series of warm core ring missions conducted during 1982. The data compare favorably with a theoretical model and with data collected on the same mission by an active sensor, the airborne oceanographic lidar (AOL).Document ID19850014926Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsGrew, G. W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1985Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberL-15885NASA-TP-2428NAS 1.60:2428Accession Number85N23237Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 618-32-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850014926.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
American Financial Corporation Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        $267,242
<SECURITIES>                                10,437,509<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  822,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,197,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        357,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     72,154
<COMMON>                                         9,625
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,312,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,197,298
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,839,734
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               334,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                106,532
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,924
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   $56,085
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Includes an investment in investee corporation of $153 million.
<F2>Not applicable since all common shares are owned by American Financial
    Group, Inc.
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### § 101-26.303 Out-of-stock items.

Generally, it is more advantageous to agencies if GSA backorders requisitions for out-of-stock items rather than cancels requisitions. Unless notified by agencies not to backorder a requisition, through FEDSTRIP advice codes 2C or 2J, a back order will be established. The agency will be notified of the estimated date that shipment will be made. Upon receipt of the status transaction, the agency shall determine if the estimated shipping date will meet its needs and, as appropriate: (a) Accept the back order, (b) request a suitable substitute item, or (c) request cancellation in accordance with § 101-26.309.

[43 FR 22210, May 24, 1978]
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.5







AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO LOAN ORIGINATION AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO LOAN ORIGINATION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of August 22, 2019 by and between GreenSky, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Servicer”), and Fifth Third Bank, an Ohio-chartered, FDIC-insured bank (“Lender”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Loan Origination Agreement (as defined herein).
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Lender and Servicer have previously entered into that certain Loan Origination Agreement dated as of August 25, 2016, as amended (collectively, the “Loan Origination Agreement”);
WHEREAS, Lender and Servicer desire to further amend the Loan Origination Agreement as set forth herein;
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Lender and Servicer hereby agree as follows:
1.The Loan Origination Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 6.01 thereof in its entirety and inserting the following in lieu thereof:
“Section 6.01 Term.  This Loan Origination Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date and shall continue until February 21, 2020, provided that such expiration date shall be extended automatically for additional one year periods without further action by the Parties, unless not less than 90 days prior to the expiration date then in effect either party gives the other party written notice of nonrenewal.”
2.Except as expressly amended hereby, the Loan Origination Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
3.This Amendment may be executed and delivered by Lender and Servicer in facsimile or PDF format and in any number of separate counterparts, all of which, when delivered, shall together constitute one and the same document.


[Signature page follows]


















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


SERVICER:


GREENSKY, LLC




By:     /s/ Timothy D. Kaliban                
Name:    Timothy D. Kaliban                    
Title:    President                        




LENDER:


FIFTH THIRD BANK




By:     /s/ Marybeth McManus                
Name:    Marybeth McManus                    
Title:    Senior Vice President, Business Controls Director    




By:     /s/ Andrew Shaknaitis                    
Name:    Andrew Shaknaitis                    
Title:    Senior Analyst, Vendor Management
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-24000-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

ROTHFOS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

H&H COFFEE INVESTMENTS, LLC,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DIVERSITY JURISDICTION

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record, which has 

revealed that the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction in this case remains unestablished. 

On December 8, 2022, Plaintiff Rothfos Corporation initiated this lawsuit against 

Defendant H&H Coffee Investments, LLC, based on diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. ECF 

No. [1]. On December 12, 2022, the Court sua sponte dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure 

to allege the citizenship of Defendant’s members. ECF No. [8]; see Purchasing Power, LLC v. 

Bluestem Brands, Inc., 851 F.3d 1218, 1220 (11th Cir. 2017) (“a limited liability company (LLC) 

is a citizen of every state that any member is a citizen of.”). 

Two days later, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint, wherein Plaintiff alleges that Alain 

Piedra Hernandez, a citizen of Florida, is the managing member of Defendant. ECF No. [9] ¶ 7. 

Plaintiff further alleges that, despite conducting “a diligent inquiry in an attempt to determine 

whether Defendant has other members,” Plaintiff “has been unable to determine and is without 

knowledge as to whether there are any other members of Defendant[.]” Id. ¶ 8.

Case 1:22-cv-24000-BB Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-24000-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2

Plaintiff has a “duty to establish diversity jurisdiction.” Purchasing Power, 851 F.3d at 

1226. Although Defendant has not challenged subject matter jurisdiction due to lack of diversity, 

the Court has “an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction 

exists[.]” Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006).

The allegations within the Amended Complaint, in themselves, are insufficient to establish 

the existence of diversity jurisdiction. The Court allowed Plaintiff to proceed on its Amended 

Complaint upon the assumption that discovery would quickly reveal whether the parties are, in 

fact, diverse. It is now time to hold Plaintiff to its burden of establishing diversity jurisdiction. 

Purchasing Power, 851 F.3d at 1226.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, on or before June 29, 2023, 

Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE that this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on June 20, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-24000-BB Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/21/2023 Page 2 of 2
68351781;1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM 

EDWIN GARRISON, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants. 

/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT DAVID ORTIZ 

Jason S. Oletsky, Esq., of the law firm Akerman LLP, hereby enters his appearances as 

counsel on behalf of Defendant David Ortiz and requests that copies of all orders, process, 

pleadings, and other documents filed or served in this matter be served on him via CM/ECF or at 

the address listed below, as appropriate. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Date: January 24, 2023 AKERMAN LLP 

201 East Las Olas Boulevard – Suite 1800 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-2229 

Tel.: 954-463-2700 

Fax: 954-463-2224 

By: /s/ Jason S. Oletsky 

Jason S. Oletsky, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 9301 

jason.oletsky@akerman.com 

Counsel for Defendant David Ortiz

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2023 Page 1 of 1