alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102-80.15 What are Federal agencies' responsibilities concerning the assessment and management of asbestos? Federal agencies have the following responsibilities concerning the assessment and management of asbestos: ( a ) Inspect and assess buildings for the presence and condition of asbestos-containing materials. Space to be leased must be free of all asbestos containing materials, except undamaged asbestos flooring in the space or undamaged boiler or pipe insulation outside the space, in which case an asbestos management program conforming to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance must be implemented.
( b ) Manage in-place asbestos that is in good condition and not likely to be disturbed.
( c ) Abate damaged asbestos and asbestos likely to be disturbed. Federal agencies must perform a pre-alteration asbestos assessment for activities that may disturb asbestos.
( d ) Not use asbestos in new construction, renovation/modernization or repair of their owned or leased space. Unless approved by GSA, Federal agencies must not obtain space with asbestos through purchase, exchange, transfer, or lease, except as identified in paragraph (a) of this section.
( e ) Communicate all written and oral asbestos information about the leased space to tenants.
#### § 102-73.5 What is the scope of this part?

The real property policies contained in this part apply to Federal agencies, including GSA's Public Buildings Service, operating under, or subject to, the authorities of the Administrator of General Services; except for subpart D of this part, which applies to Federal agencies exercising independent leasing authority in addition to those agencies operating under or subject to the authorities of the Administrator of General Services.

[88 FR 14065, Mar. 7, 2023]
§ 102-75.1045 Are there exceptions to the policy that requires public notice be given before Federal agencies abandon or destroy improvements on land or related personal property? Yes, property can be abandoned or destroyed without public notice if— ( a ) Its value is so low or the cost of its care and handling so great that retaining the property to post public notice is clearly not economical;
( b ) Health, safety, or security considerations require its immediate abandonment or destruction; or
( c ) The assigned mission of the agency might be jeopardized by the delay, and a duly authorized Federal agency official finds in writing, with respect to paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section, and a reviewing authority approves this finding. The finding must be in addition to the determinations prescribed in §§ 102-75.1000, 102-75.1005, 102-75.1010, and 102-75.1025.
#### § 101-26.803 Discrepancies or deficiencies in shipments, material, or billings.
AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                           AGREEMENT TO FURNISH COPIES
                                   EXHIBIT 99

Pursuant to the requirements of Rule 601(b)(4)(v) of S.E.C.  Regulation S-K, the
undersigned  registrant  hereby  undertakes  to furnish  copies of the following
documents to the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request:

     Demand Note with Variable  Interest Rate, dated September 11, 1997, made by
     the Company in favor of the Richardson Testamentary Trust.

     Demand Note with Variable  Interest Rate, dated September 11, 1997, made by
     the Company in favor of the Estate of Beatrice H. Richardson.


                                           AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                                           (Registrant)


Date:    4/13/98                           /s/ Michael A. Richardson
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Michael A. Richardson
                                           CHAIRMAN
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                      (11)
## NO. 12

- 17

- 00112

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

LARRY JOHNSON,

APPELLANT

V.

JAMES W. VOLBERDING,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Larry Johnson, acting pro se, attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order denying his

Rule 215 motion to impose sanctions on James W. Volberding

. On April 10, 2017 , this Court

notified Johnson that his notice of appeal failed t o show the j urisdiction of the C ourt, namely, the

order being appealed is not an appealable order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.2. We further notified

Johnson that his appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or before

May 10 , 2017 to show the juris diction of this Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.2, 42.3, 44.3.

Johnson responded to our letter, stating that there exists subject matter jurisdiction, in

personam jurisdiction, and geographical jurisdiction. However, unless one of the sources of our

autho rity specifically authorizes an interlocutory appeal, we only have jurisdiction over an

appeal taken from a final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.

2001). The order denying Johnson’s motion for sanctions is not a final judg ment or appealable

interlocutory order. See Manning v. Enbridge Pipelines, L.P.

, 345 S.W.3d 718, 72 9 (Tex.

App.

— Beaumont 2011, pet. denied ) ; see also Byrd v. By rd

, No. 02

- 07

- 00404

- CV, 2008 WL

204511, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Jan. 24, 2008, no pet. ) (me m. op.); T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. &2

R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2016 )

. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of

jurisdiction

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a).

Opinion delivered May 24, 2017.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 24 , 2017

NO. 12

- 17

- 00112

- CV

LARRY JOHNSON,
Appellant

V.

JAMES W. VOLBERDING,

Appellee

A ppeal from the 7th District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 16

- 1452

- A)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same

being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that it is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and

that t he appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction ; and that this decision

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew A. Cohoat,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of the operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/     Matthew  A. Cohoat |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Matthew A. Cohoat                                   |
|   | Executive Vice  President and                       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  of the                     |
|   |   General  Partner                        |
|   | Date: March 6,  2008                           |

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, andwill be retained by Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Charles A. Hasper, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of The Allied Defense Group,
Inc.;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 9, 2004
    
    
    
    /s/ Charles A. HasperCharles A. Hasper,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer
 33
#### § 102-2.145 To what do pronouns refer when used in the FMR?

Throughout its text, the FMR may contain pronouns such as, but not limited to, we, you, and I. When pronouns are used, each subchapter of the FMR will indicate whether they refer to the reader, an agency, GSA, or some other entity. In general, pronouns refer to who or what must perform a required action.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Katherine Greenberg, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  December 2, 2003
    
    
    
    
    
    /s/ KATHERINE GREENBERGKatherine GreenbergSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Peoples Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



                                           /s/Teresa A. O'Quinn
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Name: Teresa A. O'Quinn
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 30, 2002
#### § 102-75.110 Can transfers of real property be made under authority of laws other than those codified in Title 40 of the United States Code?

Yes, the provisions of this section shall not apply to transfers of real property authorized to be made by 40 U.S.C. 113(e) or by any special statute that directs or requires an Executive agency to transfer or convey specifically described real property in accordance with the provisions of that statute. Transfers of real property must be made only under the authority of Title 40 of the United States Code, unless the independent authority granted to such agency specifically exempts the authority from the requirements of Title 40.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Alrenco, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-08915) of our report dated March 3,
1998, on our audits of the supplemental consolidated financial statements of
Alrenco, Inc. and subsidiaries, after restatement for the 1998 pooling of
interests with RTO, Inc. as described in Note 1 to those financial statements,
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Spartanburg, South Carolina
March 30, 1998
§ 551.7 Calculation of funds for recipient executive agencies. ( a ) The Postal Service is to determine its reasonable costs in executing its responsibilities pursuant to the Semipostal Authorization Act, as specified in § 551.8. These costs are offset against the revenue received through sale of each semipostal stamp in excess of the First-Class Mail single-piece first-ounce rate in effect at the time of purchase.
( b ) Any reasonable costs offset by the Postal Service shall be retained by it, along with revenue from the sale of the semipostal stamps, as recorded by sales units through the use of a specially designated account.
( c ) The Postal Service is to pay designated recipient executive agency(ies) the remainder of the differential revenue less an amount to recover the reasonable costs of the Postal Service, as determined under § 551.8.
( d ) The amounts for recipient executive agencies are transferred in a manner and frequency determined by mutual agreement, consistent with the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 416.
Exhibit
32







Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


and
Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002










Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Roger S. Marcus, Chief Executive
Officer, and Howard N. Feist III, Chief Financial Officer, of American Biltrite
Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:




The
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of the
Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  November
13, 2009


/s/ Roger S.
Marcus


Roger
S. Marcus


Chief
Executive Officer











/s/ Howard N. Feist III


Howard
N. Feist III


Chief
Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES 

OCTAVIO COLLADO COLLECTIVE ACTION

For himself and all others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC, 

d/b/a KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC, and 

ROMAN JONES, 

Defendants. 

____________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 23(B)(3) 

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendants, 450 North River Drive, LLC, 

d/b/a Kiki on the River, Roman Jones, and RJ River LLC’s Motion for Extension of Time to 

Respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification Pursuant to Rule 23(B)(3). The Court having 

reviewed the Motion and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, hereby 

ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that the Motion is GRANTED. 450 North River Drive, LLC, 

d/b/a Kiki on the River, Roman Jones, and RJ River, LLC shall respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Class Certification Pursuant to Rule 23(B)(3) on or before August 9, 2023. 

DONE AND ORDERED this ___ day of July 2023, in Miami, Florida. 

 __________________________________ 

JUDGE BETH BLOOM 

UNITED STATES DISTRIC COURT 

cc: All Counsel of Record 

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 173-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2023 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is _____________________________________.

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the 

FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC,

d/b/a Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively 

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River 

and the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is 

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein 

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by 

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Dated ______________, 2023. Signed:_________________________

Printed Name:____________________

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: _________________________________ Tel No.:___________________________

_________________________________ Email: ____________________________

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156 / brian@fairlawattorney.com

TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1 Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 208-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2023 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 1 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 2 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 3 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 4 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 5 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 6 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 7 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 8 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 9 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 10 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 11 of 12

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023   Page 12 of 12
#### § 102-81.31 Are there any special considerations for leased facilities or new construction?

Yes. GSA will coordinate with the occupant agency and the security organization responsible for the Federal facility or Federal grounds when determining the applicable physical security clauses to use in the procurement package.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Humatech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: December 8, 2003
/s/ David WilliamsBy: David WilliamsIts: Chief Executive Officer 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Humatech, Inc. and will be retained by Humatech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 102-75.115 Must reports of excess real property and related personal property be prepared on specific forms? Yes, landholding agencies must prepare reports of excess real property and related personal property on— ( a ) Standard Form 118, Report of Excess Real Property, and accompanying Standard Form 118a, Buildings Structures, Utilities, and Miscellaneous Facilities, Schedule A;
( b ) Standard Form 118b, Land, Schedule B; and
( c ) Standard Form 118c, Related Personal Property, Schedule C.