alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION            
| |                                      
| |                                      
| | /s/ DAVIDP. STOREY                   
| | David P. Storey                      
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

November 2, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-22808-BLOOM

SOLOMON DAVID ROBERTS, 

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS, 

Respondent.

/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on pro se Petitioner Solomon David Robert’s Motion 

for Certificate of Appealability, ECF No. [8]. Petitioner seeks to appeal the Court’s September 6, 

2022 Order, ECF No. [3], dismissing his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254, ECF No. [1].

A prisoner seeking to appeal a district court’s final order denying his petition for a writ of 

habeas corpus has no absolute entitlement to appeal and must obtain a certificate of appealability. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1); Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009). A certificate of 

appealability shall issue only if a petitioner makes “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Where, as here, a district court dismisses a petition 

based on procedural grounds, a petitioner must further demonstrate that reasonable jurists “would 

find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 

Here, reasonable jurists would not debate the Court’s decision to dismiss the case without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute as Petitioner neglected to pay the filing fee or file a motion to 

Case 1:22-cv-22808-BB Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-22808-BLOOM

2

proceed in forma pauperis as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Nor would reasonable jurists debate 

the Court’s conclusion that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction as the Petition is “second or 

successive” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Petitioner’s Motion for Certificate 

of Appealability, ECF No. [8], is DENIED. The case shall remain closed. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on July 14, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Solomon David Roberts

066691

Martin Correctional Institution

Inmate Mail/Parcels

1150 SW Allapattah Road

Indiantown, FL 34956

PRO SE

Case 1:22-cv-22808-BB Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         264,430     
<SECURITIES>                                   408,739     
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,344     
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0           
<INVENTORY>                                    2,438,241   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,489,897   
<PP&E>                                         4,128,648   
<DEPRECIATION>                                 756,713     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,371,935   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,289,060   
<BONDS>                                        968,242     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0     
<PREFERRED>                                    0           
<COMMON>                                       116,868           
<OTHER-SE>                                     0           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,955,620   
<SALES>                                        346,930     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               635,852     
<CGS>                                          321,737     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,181,395   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0           
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0           
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0           
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0           
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0           
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0           
<CHANGES>                                      0           
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,513,887) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.14)      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0           
                                                                              
                                                                              

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5355 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5355

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 127 Social Street in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, as the ``Alphonse F. 
                    Auclair Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2000

 Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 127 Social Street in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, as the ``Alphonse F. 
                    Auclair Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALPHONSE F. AUCLAIR POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 127 Social Street in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Alphonse F. Auclair Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Alphonse F. 
Auclair Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2531

JOHN A. BRINKLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97-

3090-MJG)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Brinkley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Medical Ctr., No. CA-97-3090-

MJG (D. Md. Oct. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
§ 102-117.150 What do I need to know about coastwise laws? You need to know that: ( a ) Goods transported entirely or partly by water between U.S. points, either directly or via a foreign port, must travel in U.S. flag vessels that have a coastwise endorsement;
( b ) There are exceptions and limits for the U.S. Island territories and possessions in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (see § 102-117.155); and
( c ) The Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection, by delegation of the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of the Treasury are authorized to impose monetary penalties against agencies that violate the coastwise laws.
[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 51394, Aug. 20, 2010; 87 FR 32322, May 31, 2022]
###### Editorial Note on Part 101-8

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-8.709 Special benefits for children and the elderly.

If a recipient's program or activity provides special benefits to the elderly or to children, such use of age distinctions is presumed to be necessary to the normal operation of the program or activity, notwithstanding the provisions of § 101-8.705.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON 

 

DONALD J. TRUMP,

 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

Defendant. 

 / 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO FILE 

REDACTED AND UNREDACTED GLOBAL ISSUES BRIEFS UNDER SEAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Motion to File Portions of Global 

Issues Brief Under Seal (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 168]. The Motion seeks permission to file under 

seal four documents, which are two alternate versions of the party’s two briefs submitted to the 

Special Master, which refer to certain seized materials or categories of seized materials, and which 

fall within the scope of the protective order issued by the Special Master [ECF No. 113]. 

The Court has reviewed the Motion and is otherwise duly advised. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The Motion [ECF No. 168] is GRANTED. 

2. On or before November 8, 2022, the parties shall file the four documents described above 

under seal. 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 168-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2022 Page 1 of 2
3. The seal will remain in place until further order of the Court. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 8th day of November

2022. 

 

cc: counsel of record 

 _______________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 168-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3050.30 Information needed to estimate the cost of the universal service obligation. [Reserved]
§ 101-4.420 Access to schools operated by LEAs. A recipient that is a local educational agency shall not, on the basis of sex, exclude any person from admission to: ( a ) Any institution of vocational education operated by such recipient; or
( b ) Any other school or educational unit operated by such recipient, unless such recipient otherwise makes available to such person, pursuant to the same policies and criteria of admission, courses, services, and facilities comparable to each course, service, and facility offered in or through such schools.
§ 102-37.215 When must a SASP make a certification regarding lobbying? You are subject to the anti-lobbying certification and disclosure requirements in part 105-69 of this title when all of the following conditions apply: ( a ) You have entered into a cooperative agreement with GSA that provides for your SASP to retain surplus property for use in performing donation functions or any other cooperative agreement.
( b ) The cooperative agreement was executed after December 23, 1989.
( c ) The fair market value of the property requested under the cooperative agreement is more than $100,000.
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 643

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 13, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To redesignate the Federal building located at 10301 South

Compton Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known

as the Watts Finance Office, as the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 643 RFS

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 10301 South Comp3 ton Avenue, in Los Angeles, California, and known as the

4 Watts Finance Office, shall be known and designated as

5 the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in any law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

10 a reference to the ‘‘Augustus F. Hawkins Post Office

11 Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 12,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Exhibit 4.39


 


Summary
of the Private Instrument of Commitment to Purchase and Sale of Real Property, entered into on November 1, 2018, in connection
with Fazenda Alto Taquari 


 


Parties:
Imobiliária Mogno Ltda., as Seller; and Airton Dall’Ago and Geancarlo Dall’Ago, as Buyers.


 


Purpose: The
commitment to sell a total area of 102.98 hectares, to be originated from Fazenda Alto Taquari, for the total price, in
Brazilian national currency (Reais), equivalent 113,278 bags of soybeans per hectare, to be paid as follows: (i) the first
installment in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 22,656 bags of soybean, on November 19, 2018; (ii) the second
installment, in the amount in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 11,328 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on March 31, 2019;
(iii) the third installment, in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 11,328 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on
August 30, 2019; (iv) the fourth installment, in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 11,328 bags of soybeans,
shall be paid on March 31, 2020; (v) the fifth installment, in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 11,328 bags
of soybeans, shall be paid on August 30, 2020; (vi) the sixth installment, in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent
to 11,328 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on March 31, 2021; (vii) the seventh installment, in the amount, in Brazilian Reais,
equivalent to 11,328 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on August 30, 2021; (viii) the eighth installment, in the amount, in Brazilian
Reais, equivalent to 11,328 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on March 31, 2022; and (ix) the ninth installment, in the amount,
in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 11,328 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on August 30, 2022.
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT
32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David L.
Yowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |                          | 
|------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|/s/ David L.
 Yowan |                         
|                    |                         
|Name:               | David L.
 Yowan         
|Title:              | Chief
 Financial Officer
|Date:               | August 12,
 2009        

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 07 -0 00 07 -C R

______________________________
CHARL ES W HI TL EY MI CK, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appea l from the 8th J udicial District Court

Hopkins County , Texas Trial Court No. 0618765

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C

. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by J ustice Carte rMick appe als from six convictions. I n 06-07-0000 4 -C R , he wa s convicted of ag g ravated 1 sexual assault on M.M. and sentence d to f orty y ear s' imprisonment (concur rent). I n cause number 06 -0 7- 00 00 5- CR, he wa s c on vic te d o f a g g ra vate d s e xua l a ssa

ul t on M. M. and

se nte nc e d to fo rt

y y ea rs ' i mprisonment (conc urre nt). I n cause number 06-07- 00006-CR, he was c onvicted for ind e c e nc y wi th a c hil d w ithJ.H. a nd

se nte nc e d to tw e nty

y e ars ' imp ri so nme nt ( c on c ur re nt) . In c a

us e numbe r 0 6- 07 -0 00 07 -C R, h e wa s c on vic te d o f i nd ecenc y wi th a c hil d w ithJ.H. and

se nte nc e d to twenty y ear s' imprisonment (concur rent). I n cause number 06-07- 00008-CR, he was convicted of one c o u n t o f indec ency

with a child with J .H. and se ntence d to twenty y ear s' imprisonment (c on c ur re nt) , a nd on e c ount o f a g g ra

vate d s e xua l a ssa

ult on a c hil d w ithJ.H. and se nte nc e d to fo rt y y ear s' imprisonment (consec utive to 0618762 (06-07- 00004-CR)). I n cause number 06-07- 00009- C R , M i c k w a s c o n v i c t e d o f o n e c o u n t o f a g g r a v a t e d s e xu a l a s s a u l t o n J. H

. an d s e n t e n c e d to f or ty y ear s' imprisonment (concur rent), a nd one count of

indece ncy

with a child with J .H. and se ntence d to twenty y ear s' imprisonment ( concur rent). I n eac h conviction, the jury also assesse d a $10,000.00 fine. Mick does not pre sent a Confrontation Cl ause issue—M.M. testified at the trial.

2 2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Cha rl e s Whit le y Mic k a

pp e a ls fr om his c on vic tio n by a jur y fo r ind e c e nc y wi th a c hil d w ith J .H. The jury

assessed his punishment at twenty y ear s' imprisonment and a $10,000.00 fine. Mick
pr e se ntl y ha s f ive oth e r c on vic tio ns c ur

re ntl y on a pp e a l be fo re thi s Co ur

t. 1 On appe al, Mick conte nds the trial cour t erre d by admitting a vide o rec ording of an inter view by a state wo rk e r wit

h an oth e r al le g e d vic tim , M.M. He a rgue s tha t this er

ro r i s r e ve rs ibl e be c a

us e 2 it leaves g rave doubt that his conviction was fr ee from the substantial influenc e of the err or. We addre ssed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on his appea l in cause number 06-07-00004- CR. For the re asons stated ther ein, we likew ise con cl u d e that error ha s not been shown.3

We affir m the judgme nt.

J ack Ca rter J ustice Date Submitted: May 30, 2008 Date D ecide d: J une 2, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--CommerceNet Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 14, 1999, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), CommerceNet Consortium, 
Inc. (the ``Consortium'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, BT Squared 
Technologies, Inc. has changed its name to 2order.com, Atlanta, GA. 
Also, Aventura Systems ASA, Oslo, Norway has been dropped as a party to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On June 13, 1994, CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on August 31, 1994 (59 FR 45012).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
23, 1999. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on December 2, 1999 (64 FR 67588).

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-15605 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M