alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 334.830 Lake Michigan; small-arms range adjacent to U.S. Naval Training Center, Great Lakes, Ill. ( a ) *The danger zone.* An area bounded on the north by latitude 42°20′30′′; on the east by longitude 87°47′30′′; on the south by latitude 42°18′45′′; and on the west by the shoreline.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) When firing affecting the danger zone is in progress, the enforcing agency will post guards at such locations that the waters in the danger zone may be observed and arrange signals whereby these guards may stop the firing should any person or vessel be seen in the waters of the danger zone. When firing is in progress, the enforcing agency will cause red flags to be displayed on shore near the rifle butts, which may be readily discernible to a person in a vessel within the danger zone.
( 2 ) The enforcing agency is hereby authorized to use such agencies as shall be necessary to prohibit all persons and vessels from entering the area until such time as shall be convenient.
( 3 ) If such flags are displayed it will indicate that firing is in progress, and that the waters in the danger zone are subject to impact by rounds missing or ricocheting off the impact berm and should not be entered until the flags are lowered.
( 4 ) Wherever possible, the enforcing agency will warn the public of the contemplated times of firing and the areas involved two days in advance of the scheduled date, through the public press and the U.S. Coast Guard. The danger zone may, however, be closed without advance notice.
( 5 ) [Reserved]
( 6 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, U.S. Naval Training Center, Great Lakes, Illinois, and such agencies as he may designate.
[13 FR 9560, Dec. 31, 1948. Redesignated at 14 FR 4904, Aug. 9, 1949, and amended at 28 FR 319, Jan. 11, 1963; 45 FR 13072, Feb. 28, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17556, Apr. 10, 1997]
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2000 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2000 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2000 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2000 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2000 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2000 Page 6 of 6
#### § 102-192.60 How do we implement these payment processes?

Guidance on implementing the Intra-governmental Payment and Collection System can be found at: *http://www.fms.treas.gov/ipac/index.html.*
#### § 102-2.40 May an agency issue implementing and supplementing regulations for the FMR?

Yes, an agency may issue implementing regulations (see § 102-2.50) to expand upon related FMR material and supplementing regulations (see § 102-2.55) to address subject material not covered in the FMR. The Office of the Federal Register assigns chapters in Title 41 of the Code of Federal Regulations for agency publication of implementing and supplementing regulations.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

SERGIO PARRA-CASTANEDA, a.k.a.

Sergio Parra Castaneda, a.k.a. Sergio 

Castaneda-Parra, a.k.a. Sergio Parra-Acosta, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-10280 

D.C. No. 4:17-cr-01490-RM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2019**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

Sergio Parra-Castaneda appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry of a 

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-10280 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Parra-Castaneda’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there 

are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

We have provided Parra-Castaneda the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental 

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Parra-Castaneda waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our 

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United 

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss 

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
§ 102-36.390 How may we dispose of foreign excess personal property? To dispose of foreign excess personal property, you may: ( a ) Offer the property for re-use by U.S. Federal agencies overseas;
( b ) Return the property to the U.S. for re-use by eligible recipients;
( c ) Sell, exchange, lease, or transfer such property for cash, credit, or other property;
( d ) Donate medical materials or supplies to nonprofit medical or health organizations, including those qualified under sections 214(b) and 607 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2174, 2357); or
( e ) Abandon, destroy or donate such property when you determine that it has no commercial value or the estimated cost of care and handling would exceed the estimated proceeds from its sale, in accordance with 40 U.S.C. 527. Abandonment, destruction or donation actions must also comply with the laws of the country in which the property is located.
[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 53572, Sept. 12, 2006]
§ 102-75.1140 What is the policy governing the acceptance or rejection of a conditional gift of real property for a particular defense purpose? Any Federal agency receiving an offer of a conditional gift of real property for a particular defense purpose within the purview of Chapter 582-Public Law 537 (July 27, 1954) must notify the appropriate GSA regional property disposal office and must submit to GSA a recommendation indicating whether the Government should accept or reject the gift. Nothing in this subpart shall be construed as applicable to the acceptance of gifts under the provisions of other laws. Following receipt of such notification and recommendation, GSA must— ( a ) Consult with the interested agencies before it may accept or reject such conditional gifts of real property on behalf of the United States or before it transfers such conditional gifts of real property to an agency; and
( b ) Advise the donor and the agencies concerned of the action taken with respect to acceptance or rejection of the conditional gift and of its final disposition.
#### § 102-117.275 What performance must I expect from a TSP?

You must expect the TSP to provide consistent and satisfactory service to meet your agency transportation needs.
§ 102-118.305 What information must be on all transportation payment records that have completed my agency's prepayment audit? ( a ) The following information must be annotated on all transportation payment records, electronically or on paper, that have completed your agency's prepayment audit and for submission to GSA Transportation Audits Division: ( 1 ) The date the bill was received from a TSP;
( 2 ) A TSP's invoice number;
( 3 ) Your agency name;
( 4 ) DRN;
( 5 ) Amount billed;
( 6 ) Date invoice was approved for payment;
( 7 ) Date and amount agency paid;
( 8 ) Payment location code number and office or organization name;
( 9 ) Payment voucher number;
( 10 ) Complete contract, tender or tariff authority, including item or section number;
( 11 ) The TSP's TIN;
( 12 ) The TSP's SCAC;
( 13 ) The auditor's authorization code or initials; and
( 14 ) A copy of any statement of difference and the date it was sent to the TSP.
( b ) Your agency can find added guidance in the “U.S. Government Freight Transportation Handbook.” This handbook is located at *www.gsa.gov/transaudits .*
#### § 102-74.345 Does the smoking policy in this part apply to the judicial branch?

This smoking policy applies to the judicial branch when it occupies space in buildings controlled by the executive branch. Furthermore, the Federal Chief Judge in a local jurisdiction may be deemed to be comparable to an agency head and may establish exceptions for Federal jurors and others as provided in § 102-74.320(d).

[73 FR 77518, Dec. 19, 2008]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23106-KMW

 Plaintiff,

vs.

PACIFIC SUNWEAR STORES, LLC.,

Foreign for Profit Corporation 

Defendant,

____________________________________________/

JOINT NOTICE/STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

 Plaintiff, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, through undersigned attorney Diego G. Mendez and 

Richard J Adams, pursuant to the Federal Rules Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) files this Joint 

Notice/Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice against Defendant, PACIFIC SUNWEAR 

STORES, LLC.. All claims and counter claims by all parties are hereby dismissed with prejudice by 

stipulation. Each party shall bear their own attorney fees and costs. 

Submitted by:

Mendez Law Offices, PLLC Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant

P.O. BOX 228630 1075 Peachtree Street, NE

Miami, Florida 33172 Suite 2500

Telephone: 305.264.9090 Atlanta, GA 30309

Facsimile: 1-305.809.8474 (404) 885-1500

Email:info@mendezlawoffices.com Email: adrummond@seyfarth.com

By: /s/ By:______/s/__________________.

DIEGO GERMAN MENDEZ, ESQ. ALEXANDRE S DRUMMOND

FL BAR NO.: 52748

Adams & Associates, P.A.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

6500 Cowpen Road, Suite 101

Miami Lakes, FL 33014

Telephone: 305-824-9800

Facsimile: 305-824-3868

Email: radamslaw@bellsouth.net

By: /s/ 

RICHARD J. ADAMS, ESQ

FL BAR NO.: 770434

###

Case 1:22-cv-23106-KMW Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2022 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-81567-KAM

NELSON FERNANDEZ, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

KD TRAN, LLC, d/b/a ZERO DEGREES, 

a foreign limited liability company; and 

M-T BOBA & DESSERTS LLC, d/b/a 

ZERO DEGREES, a Florida limited liability 

company, 

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses all his claims in this action with prejudice, with each 

party to bear his/its own attorney’s fees and costs. 

Dated: November 18, 2022 

Respectfully submitted,

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com 

By____s/ Roderick V. Hannah __ By ___s/ Pelayo M. Duran ______

RODERICK V. HANNAH PELAYO M. DURAN

Fla. Bar No. 435384 Fla. Bar No. 0146595

Case 9:22-cv-81567-KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2022 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 18, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being 

served this day on all counsel and parties of record identified on the below Service List in the 

manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or 

in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive 

electronically Notices of Electronic Filing

By s/ Roderick V. Hannah

RODKERICK V. HANNAH

Service List

Roderick V. Hannah, Esq. Pelayo M. Duran, Esq.

RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO

Counsel for Plaintiff DURAN, P.A.

4800 N. Hiatus Road Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

Sunrise, FL 33351 4640 N.W. 7th Street

T. 954/362-3800 Miami, FL 33126-2309

954/362-3779 (Facsimile) T. 305/266-9780 

Email: rhannah@rhannahlaw.com 305/269-8311 (Facsimile)

(via CM/ECF) Email: pduran@pelayoduran.com

(via CM/ECF)

Defendants KD Tran, LLC d/b/a Zero Degrees

 and M-T Boba Desserts LLC d/b/a Zero Degrees

c/o Jimmy Nguyen, Esq.

ATTORNEY AT LAW, APC

17011 Beach Boulevard, Suite 900

Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5998

(949) 438-1714

jimmy@jmnlegal.com

(via e-mail)

Case 9:22-cv-81567-KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 761.6 Delivery of Postal Service securities.

A Reserve Bank which has received Postal Service securities and effected pledges, made entries regarding them, or transferred or delivered them according to the instructions of its depositor is not liable for conversion or for participation in breach of fiduciary duty even though the depositor had no right to dispose of or take other action in respect of the securities. A Reserve Bank shall be fully discharged of its obligations under this part by the delivery of Postal Service securities in definitive form to its depositor or upon the order of such depositor. Customers of a member bank or other depositary (other than a Reserve Bank) may obtain Postal Service securities in definitive form only by causing the depositor of the Reserve Bank to order the withdrawal thereof from the Reserve Bank.
§ 102-73.120 How much of a price preference must Federal agencies give when acquiring leased space using the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process? Federal agencies must give a price evaluation preference to space in historic properties as follows: ( a ) First to suitable historic properties within historic districts, a 10 percent price preference.
( b ) If no suitable historic property within an historic district is offered, or the 10 percent preference does not result in such property being the lowest price technically acceptable offer, the Government will give a 2.5 percent price preference to suitable non-historic developed or undeveloped sites within historic districts.
( c ) If no suitable non-historic developed or undeveloped site within an historic district is offered, or the 2.5 percent preference does not result in such property being the lowest price technically acceptable offer, the Government will give a 10 percent price preference to suitable historic properties outside of historic districts.
( d ) Finally, if no suitable historic property outside of historic districts is offered, no historic price preference will be given to any property offered.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-CR-20521-RNS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs.

THEODORE FARNSWORTH and

J. MITCHELL LOWE

Defendants.

 /

UNITED STATES’ SEVENTH RESPONSE TO 

THE STANDING DISCOVERY ORDERS

The United States hereby files its seventh response to the Standing Discovery Orders (ECF 

Nos. 8 and 9) as to Defendants Theodore Farnsworth and J. Michell Lowe (the “Defendants”) and 

hereby notifies the Court and all interested parties that as of August 15, 2023, the following 

supplemental discovery has been produced to the Defendants: 

Description Beginning Bates Range Ending Bates Range

Supplemental Metadata 

Field Overlays N/A N/A

Supplemental Image Files DOJ-PROD24-0000000001 DOJ-PROD24-0000295869

Correspondence DOJ-PROD24-0000295870 DOJ-PROD24-0000295876

Exhibits from

Government’s Letter to 

Defense Counsel dated July 

10, 2023

DOJ-PROD25-0000000001 DOJ-PROD25-0000000004

Discovery Produced in 

United States v. Itum, 2:23-

CR-82-FMO (C.D. Cal.)

DOJ-PROD25-0000000005 DOJ-PROD25-0000004013

Podcasts DOJ-PROD25-0000004017 DOJ-PROD25-0000004140

Tips, Complaints, and 

Referrals Report Submitted DOJ-PROD25-0000004141 DOJ-PROD25-0000004180

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

to the U.S. Securities and 

Exchange Commission 

Exhibits from 

Government’s Revocation 

Motion dated August 8, 

2023

DOJ-PROD26-0000000001 DOJ-PROD26-0000000191

Toll Records DOJ-PROD26-0000000192 DOJ-PROD26-0000008414

Bank Records DOJ-PROD26-0000008415 DOJ-PROD26-0000009849

Vehicle Registration 

Records DOJ-PROD26-0000009850 DOJ-PROD26-0000009850

Interview Notes DOJ-PROD26-0000009851 DOJ-PROD26-0000009857

Cell Phone Extraction DOJ-PROD26-0000009858 DOJ-PROD26-0000009858

Photographs and Video DOJ-PROD27-0000000001 DOJ-PROD27-0000000007

Audio Recording DOJ-PROD28-0000000001 DOJ-PROD28-0000000001

The United States recognizes that its obligation to provide discovery is of a continuing 

nature and will supplement this response if and when it obtains additional evidence and materials. 

Respectfully submitted,

GLENN S. LEON

CHIEF, FRAUD SECTION

CRIMINAL DIVISION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

By: /s/ Lauren Archer 

Lauren Archer 

Christopher Fenton

Matthew Reilly

Trial Attorneys

Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 (Archer)

United States Department of Justice

Criminal Division, Fraud Section

1400 New York Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 538-3859

Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 15, 2023, the foregoing was filed and served on all counsel 

of record using the CM/ECF system.

/s/ Lauren Archer 

Lauren Archer

Trial Attorney

Florida Special Bar No. A5502575

United States Department of Justice

Criminal Division, Fraud Section

1400 New York Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 538-3859

Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, David Hirschhorn, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:June 20, 2006     By:  /S/ David Hirschhorn    David Hirschhorn    Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chief Financial Officer
#### § 102-39.30 How do I request a deviation from this part?

See part 102-2 of this chapter (41 CFR part 102-2) to request a deviation from the requirements of this part.

[73 FR 50880, Aug. 29, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 118 (Monday, June 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37958-37959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15358]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CENSUS MONITORING BOARD


Notice of Public Meeting

SUMMARY: This notice, in compliance with Pub. L. 105-119, sets forth 
the meeting date, time, and place for two public meetings of the U.S. 
Census Monitoring Board in Southern California. The agenda is to hear 
from community based groups regarding the operations of the census 
within the area. Additionally, the Board will have a general business 
meeting.
    Date: Monday June 26, 2000.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Location: Town & Gown Center, Main Campus, University of Southern 
California, Los Angeles, CA

    Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2000.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 11 a.m.
    Location: San Diego Association of Governments, 7th Floor, Board 
Room, 401 B Street, San Diego, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Clark Reid, 301-457-5080

[[Page 37959]]

Deputy Executive Director (Congressional Members) or Robert Cunningham 
(Presidential Members) 301-457-9900.

    Dated: June 13, 2000.
Fred T. Asbell,
Executive Director, Congressional Members.
Mark Johnson,
Executive Director, Presidential Members.
[FR Doc. 00-15358 Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-M
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc. (f/k/a Vsource, Inc.)
 Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationDel Mar Acquisition, Inc.
    
    NevadaDel Mar GenPar, Inc.
    
    NevadaFirst Physicians Business Solutions, LLC
    
    OklahomaFirst Physicians Community Healthcare Services, Inc.
    
    NevadaFirst Physicians Realty Group, LLC
    
    DelawareFirst Physicians Resources, LLC
    
    NevadaFPS-1, LLC
    
    NevadaOutpatient Surgery of Del Mar, LLC
    
    CaliforniaOutpatient Surgery of Point Loma, LLC
    
    CaliforniaPoint Loma Acquisition, Inc.
    
    NevadaPoint Loma GenPar, Inc.
    
    NevadaRHA Anadarko, LLC
    
    OklahomaRHA Stroud, LLC
    
    OklahomaRHA Tishomingo, LLC
    
    OklahomaRural Hospital Acquisition, LLC (operating under
the trade name of Southern Plains Medical Group,
LLC)
    
    OklahomaSouthern Plains Medical Center, Inc.
    
    OklahomaSurgical Center Management, Inc.
    
    NevadaTri-Isthmus Group (USA), Inc.
    
    DelawareVirtual Source, Inc.
    
    NevadaVsource (USA) Inc.
    
    DelawareVsource (California) Inc.
    
    CaliforniaVsource (CI) Ltd
    
    Cayman IslandsVsource (Asia) Ltd
    
    Hong KongVsource (BVI) Ltd
    
    British Virgin IslandsVsource (Singapore) Pte Ltd
    
    SingaporeVsource (Nevada) Inc.
    
    Nevada