alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 18

Superior TeleCom Inc.

Re: Form 10-Q Report for the Quarter ended September 30, 1999

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is written to meet the requirements of Regulation S-K calling for a
letter from a registrant's independent accountants whenever there has been a
change in accounting principle or practice.

We have been informed that, as of July 1, 1999, the Company changed from the
LIFO method of accounting for the communications segment of the acquired
operations of Essex International Inc. ("Essex") to the FIFO method. According
to the management of the Company, this change was made to conform the
operational and accounting policies of this business segment. Such conformity
was desired due to the Company's integration of the manufacturing operations of
the previously separate Essex communications business into Superior TeleCom
Inc.'s existing communications operations.

A complete coordinated set of financial and reporting standards for determining
the preferability of accounting principles among acceptable alternative
principles has not been established by the accounting profession. Thus, we
cannot make an objective determination of whether the change in accounting
described in the preceding paragraph is to a preferable method. However, we have
reviewed the pertinent factors, including those related to financial reporting,
in this particular case on a subjective basis, and our opinion stated below is
based on our determination made in this manner.

We are of the opinion that the Company's change in method of accounting is to an
acceptable alternative method of accounting, which, based upon the reasons
stated for the change and our discussions with you, is also preferable under the
circumstances in this particular case. In arriving at this opinion, we have
relied on the business judgment and business planning of your management.

We have not audited the application of this change to the financial statements
of any period subsequent to December 31, 1998. Further, we have not examined and
do not express any opinion with respect to your financial statements for the
nine-months ended September 30, 1999.

Very truly yours,

BY: /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
----------------------------
TRI-ISTHMUS GROUP, INC. 2007 FORM 10-KT/A **Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, David Hirschhorn, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Transition Report on Form 10-K of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 11, 2008       By:  /s/ David Hirschhorn   David Hirschhorn   Chief Executive Officer
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-153-CR

ERIK BLACK A/K/A

ERIC BLACK APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 22, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Year 2000 Summer Study Task Forces 
on Defensive Information Operations, Intelligence Needs for Civil 
Support, Defense Against Biological Weapons, and Unconventional Nuclear 
Warfare will meet in closed session on August 6-18, 2000, at the 
Beckman Center, Irvine, California.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Task Forces will focus on assuring DoD's ability to carry 
out Joint Vision 2010 in the face of information warfare attack; 
developing an integrated picture of the intelligence required to 
effectively contribute to our civil support responsibilities in the 
three threat areas; increasing our future preparedness to deter, defend 
against, respond to, and attribute attack on the Nation by biological 
weapons; and addressing the current state of detection, identification, 
response and prevention of terrorist, subnational, or other 
unconventional nuclear attacks on the U.S.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II (1994)), it has 
been determined that these DSB Task Force meetings concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly these 
meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: June 9, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-15076 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
EXHIBIT H

Case 1:22-cv-23519-KMM Document 31-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 1 of 3
COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 110 TOWER - 110 S.E. 6TH STREET, SUITE 2700 - FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301 (954) 703-3700 (954) 703-3701 FAX 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ATLAS AIR, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 22-cv-23519-KMM-LFL

DECLARATION OF MATTHEW A. GREEN, ESQ.

I, Matthew A. Green, Esq., hereby declare:

1. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and am fully competent to make this 

Declaration. The facts set forth within this Declaration are made based upon my personal 

knowledge and upon information provided to me by others and are true and correct.

2. I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida and admitted to practice 

in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. I am an associate at the 

law firm Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., and I am counsel of record in this action for Defendant, 

Flight Services International, LLC (“FSI”).

3. This Declaration is submitted in support of FSI’s argument, within Defendants’ 

Consolidated Memorandum in Support of Incorporated Motions to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 

12(B)(1), 12(B)(2), and 12(B)(6) (“Defendants’ Motion”), that Plaintiffs’, Cindy Barrionuevo, 

Rebecca Robertson, Elizabeth Stoneking, Barbara Surber, Geri Tonda, and Ricardo Torres 

(collectively, “Plaintiffs”), claims against it should be dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction in light of executed arbitration agreements. 

Case 1:22-cv-23519-KMM Document 31-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 2 of 3
Case No. 22-cv-23519-KMM-LFL

-2- COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 110 TOWER - 110 S.E. 6TH STREET, SUITE 2700 - FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301 (954) 703-3700 (954) 703-3701 FAX 

4. Attached to Defendants’ Motion as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of each of 

these Plaintiffs’ signed agreements to be subject to a mandatory arbitration clause upon 

employment with FSI. This signed arbitration agreement provides that all “disputes, claims and 

controversies” Plaintiffs may have with FSI are subject to mandatory and binding arbitration. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the Unites States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: February 6, 2023 s/ Matthew A. Green

Matthew A. Green, Esq.

Case 1:22-cv-23519-KMM Document 31-8 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer, Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|   |  |                                              
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|By |  | /s/ William S. Ayer                          
|   |  | William S. Ayer                              
|   |  | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
|   |  | November 13, 2006
§ 102-37.220 Are there special types of surplus property that require written justification when submitting a transfer request? Yes, a SASP must obtain written justification from the intended donee, and submit it to GSA along with the transfer request, prior to allocation of: ( a ) Aircraft and vessels covered by § 102-37.455;
( b ) Items requested specifically for cannibalization;
( c ) Foreign gifts and decorations (see part 102-42 of this chapter);
( d ) Items containing 50 parts per million or greater of polychlorinated biphenyl (see part 101-42 of this title);
( e ) Firearms as described in part 101-42 of this title; and
( f ) Any item on which written justification will assist GSA in making allocation to States with the greatest need.
§ 102-33.165 What standards must we establish or require (contractually, where applicable) for operation of our flight program? For operation of your flight program, you must establish or require (contractually, where applicable)— ( a ) Basic qualifications and currency requirements for your pilots and other crewmembers, maintenance personnel, administrative personnel and other mission-related personnel;
( b ) Limitations on duty time and flight time for pilots and other crewmembers;
( c ) Procedures to record and track flight time, duty time, training of crewmembers, and applicable medical requirements;
( d ) Compliance with owning-agency or military safety of flight notices and operational bulletins;
( e ) Flight-following procedures to notify management and initiate search and rescue operations for lost or downed aircraft;
( f ) Dissemination, as your agency determines appropriate, of a disclosure statement to all crewmembers and qualified non-crewmembers who fly aboard your agency's Government aircraft (see Appendix A to this part);
( g ) Creation of a manifest, at the origin of each flight, that contains the full names of all persons on board for each leg of flight, a point of contact for each person, and phone numbers for the points of contact;
( h ) Documentation of any changes in the manifest by leg, and retention of manifests for two years from the time of flight;
( i ) Procedures for reconciling flight manifests with persons actually on board and a method to test those procedures periodically;
( j ) At the origin of each flight, preparation of a complete weight and balance computation and a cargo-loading manifest, and retention of this computation and manifest for 30 days from the date of flight;
( k ) Appropriate emergency procedures and equipment for specific missions;
( l ) Procedures to ensure that required Aviation Life Support Equipment (ALSE) is inspected and serviceable; and
( m ) Procedures to implement a “risk assessment” before each flight and/or as frequently as necessary that include such items as weather, crew rest, type of flight (low level, Instrument Flight Rules (IFR), night, etc.) crew makeup, etc. This process should be accomplished in accordance with your agency's operations, flight dispatch, or flight following procedures/program.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Improving Fuel Efficiency of Weapons Platforms will meet in closed session on June 20-21 at Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, 9500 MacArthur Boulevard, West Bethesda, MD 20817-5700.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting, The Task Force will review fuel-efficient technologies, including new or improved fuels, engines, Alternative Fueled Vehicles, and other advanced technologies and assess their operational, logistical, cost, and environmental impacts for a range of practical implementation scenarios.

Due to critical mission requirements in finalizing briefings for this Task Force, there is insufficient time to provide timely notice required by Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and Subsection 101-6.1015(b) of the GSA Final Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR Part 101-6, which further requires publication at least 15 calendar days prior to the meeting of the Task Force on June 20-21, 2000. Persons interested in further information should call Commander Brian D. Hughes, USN, at (703) 695-4157.

Dated: June 13, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-15435  Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP96-200-055]

Take notice that on June 8, 2000, Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company (REGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be effective June 9, 2000:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 8H

                    REGT states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the addition of a new negotiated rate contract.                           ( print page 38272)    

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said failing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). 

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-15480 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23686-CIV-ALTONAGA/Damian

JORGE ARMANDA DERAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

PIKE ELECTRIC, LLC,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court sua sponte. On January 13, 2023, the Court entered 

an Order Administratively Closing Case [ECF No. 15] requiring the parties to file a stipulation of 

dismissal within sixty (60) days of the Order. To date, no stipulation of dismissal has been filed, 

nor have the parties requested additional time to comply. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 15th day of March, 2023.

 ________________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-23686-CMA Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
          32.1
 C.E.O.
        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE
        ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
        hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b)
        and 18
        U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
        that he is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
        that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
        for
        the periods covered in the Report.
 
 /s/
                  Michael A. RichardsonMichael
                  A. RichardsonChairman
                  and Chief Executive OfficerAmerican
                  Consumers, Inc.Date:  January
                  15, 2008
§ 20.301 Representation. ( a ) A party may appear— ( 1 ) Without counsel;
( 2 ) With an attorney; or
( 3 ) With other duly authorized representative.
( b ) Any attorney, or any other duly authorized representative, shall file a notice of appearance. The notice must indicate— ( 1 ) The name of the case, including docket number if assigned;
( 2 ) The person on whose behalf the appearance is made; and
( 3 ) The person's and the representative's mailing addresses and telephone numbers.
( c ) Any attorney or other duly authorized representative shall also file a notice, including the items listed in paragraph (a) of this section, for any withdrawal of appearance.
( d ) Any attorney shall be a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a State, the District of Columbia, or any territory or commonwealth of the United States. A personal representation of membership is sufficient proof, unless the ALJ orders more evidence.
( e ) Any person who would act as a duly authorized representative and who is not an attorney shall file a statement setting forth the basis of his or her authority to so act. The ALJ may deny appearance as representative to any person who, the ALJ finds, lacks the requisite character, integrity, or proper personal conduct.