alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          33,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  249,992<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       2,472,419
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,116,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,862,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,059,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     643,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,862,003
<SALES>                                        108,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               788,792
<CGS>                                           61,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  580,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,350
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,005
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,138)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    64,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.44
<FN>
<F1>THE VALUE FOR RECEIVABLES REPRESENTS THEIR AMOUNT NET OF THEIR ALLOWANCES.
<F2>AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET EXISTS IN THE REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
        32.2


C.F.O.
        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE
        ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
        hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b)
        and 18
        U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
        that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and
        that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
        for
        the periods covered in the Report.
 
 /s/
                  Paul R. CookPaul
                  R. CookExecutive
                  Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)American
                  Consumers, Inc.Date:  January
                  15, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-20540-CR-ALTONAGA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DELVIS LARA FUENTES, 

YOSLANY LEYVA DEL SOL, 

and LEDIER MACHIN ANDINO,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s Reports and 

Recommendations on Changes of Plea, all entered on May 17, 2023 [ECF Nos. 74, 75, and 76]. 

To date, no party has filed an objection. Being fully advised, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Reports [ECF Nos. 74, 75, and 76] are 

AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED, and Defendants’ guilty pleas are accepted. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 1st day of June, 2023.

 ________________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid

Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Form S-1 (No.333-133203), Form S-8 (No. 333-103030) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan of CentraFinancial Holdings, Inc. and Form S-4 (No. 333-93437) of Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. of ourreport dated March 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CentraFinancial Holdings, Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPCleveland, Ohio
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

COREY BOSTON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 20 2 4

- 1214

August 28, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141 (b)(2) f rom the Circuit Court for

Pinellas County ; Philip Federico

, Judge.

PER CURIAM

.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and LUCAS a nd L ABRIT JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
# Instructions

# Quantitative

# Qualitative

CDC Vaccine Access Report
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5312

AN ACT

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to protect children

from drug traffickers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5312 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Our Chil3 dren From Drugs Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR

5 USING MINORS TO DISTRIBUTE DRUGS.

6 Section 420 of the Controlled Substances Act (21

7 U.S.C. 861) is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘one year’’

9 and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and

10 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘one year’’

11 and inserting ‘‘5 years’’.

12 SEC. 3. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR

13 DISTRIBUTING DRUGS TO MINORS.

14 Section 418 of the Controlled Substances Act (21

15 U.S.C. 859) is amended—

16 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘one year’’

17 and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and

18 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘one year’’

19 and inserting ‘‘5 years’’.

20 SEC. 4. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR

21 DRUG TRAFFICKING IN OR NEAR A SCHOOL

22 OR OTHER PROTECTED LOCATION.

23 Section 419 of the Controlled Substances Act (21

24 U.S.C. 860) is amended—

25 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘one year’’

26 and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and
3

•HR 5312 EH

1 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘three years’’

2 each place that term appears and inserting ‘‘5

3 years’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 17,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5312

AN ACT

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to protect

children from drug traffickers.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6636

BELVIN M. PAGE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES M. CONDON,

Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Chief District

Judge. (CA-98-767-4-12BC)

Submitted: June 30, 1999 Decided: September 13, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Belvin M. Page, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Belvin M. Page appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to Appellees on his petition filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Page v. Moore,

No. CA-98-767-4-12BC (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 154.2023 Recertification—certifying entity responsibilities, generally. ( a ) Before the recertification of a facility vapor control system (VCS) the certifying entity must perform the reviews specified in 33 CFR 154.2022, except paragraphs (a) through (c).
( b ) The certifying entity must review, inspect, and observe tests of a facility VCS's design or configuration alteration before recertifying a VCS that was certified or approved for operation prior to July 23, 1990, to ensure that the altered system complies with applicable regulations. In general, the certifying entity should perform the review, inspection, and observe tests as specified in 33 CFR 154.2022(a) through (c). However, depending on the extent of the alteration, the review, inspection, or test observing may not need to be as comprehensive as those for an initial certification.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 (AUDITED) AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,356
<PP&E>                                         251,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,020,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,885,586
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        334
<COMMON>                                         1,706
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,867,288)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,020,338
<SALES>                                        316,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               316,595
<CGS>                                          309,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             305,946
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,657,715)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,657,715)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,657,715)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.64)

</TABLE>
Member Enrollment Flow Chart April 2019 Phase 1

Essential prior to enrollment: 

- Set up operating sites/service 

locations in eGrants

- Submit Service Opportunity 

Listing in MyAmeriCorps Member 

Recruitment

Award 

Notification

Phase 2

Required NSCHCs: NSOPW check 

and initiation of State and FBI checks

Accept invitation via 

email; complete 

member portion of 

Enrollment Form

Apply via 

MyAmeriCorps

Select member 

applicant in 

MyAmeriCorps

Send invitation 

to applicant via 

MyAmeriCorps

Screen members 

for eligibility and 

criminal history

Apply outside 

MyAmeriCorps

Note: Members who previously served in AmeriCorps 

must ensure that they are exited from their previous 

program in MyAmeriCorps

Key

= CNCS

= Program 

Staff

= Member 

Applicant

= Social 

Security 

Administration

Phase 3

Update 

Enrollment 

Form with 

“Verified” 

status

If verified 

automatically:

If not verified 

automatically:

Request secure 

link and submit 

necessary 

documentation 

via National 

Service Hotline

Notify 

program

SSN and 

Citizenship 

checks

Documentation 

is verified

Account for 

additional time to 

gather/submit 

documentation

In eGrants

Important: Criminal history checks must be certified by 

checking the boxes on or before member’s start date

- Confirm that SSN/Citizenship are in “Verified” or “Manually Verified” status

- Check NSCHC boxes certifying the completion of NSOPW check and initiation of State 

and FBI checks

- Enter member placement info on Enrollment Form including: Start Date, Program Year, 

Program Title (operating site name), Service Location, Slot Type

Note: Members who 

previously received the 

equivalent of 2 full time 

education awards, or will 

exceed 2 full time awards 

with the new term, will 

need to acknowledge 

partial or no education 

award prior to enrollment

Member Start Date

Click the “Enroll” 

button in eGrants to 

enroll the member

ENROLLMENT MUST BE COMPLETE 8 calendar days from member start date
#### § 102-2.25 When are other agencies involved in developing the FMR?

Normally, GSA will ask agencies to collaborate in developing parts of the FMR.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40423

Summary Calendar

 

BERTRAND BROWN; ET AL

Plaintiffs

BERTRAND BROWN

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION

Defendant - Appellee

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:95-CV-428

--------------------

July 18, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bertrand Brown, Texas state prisoner #296134, appeals from

the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint

without prejudice. He argues that the district court erred by

dismissing his civil rights complaint without prejudice based

merely upon the number of defendants named and claims raised in

the suit and that the district court abused its discretion by

denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. We have
No. 99-40423

-2-

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Brown has not

shown that the district court erred by dismissing his civil

rights complaint without prejudice, and he has shown no

exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of counsel. 

See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). 

Finally, because Brown has not adequately briefed his claims that

the district court erred by ordering him to pay a $26.97 initial

partial filing fee and by denying his motion for a temporary

restraining order, these claims are deemed abandoned on appeal

and are therefore not considered by this court. Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5072

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain

hydroelectric projects located in the State of West Virginia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. MOLLOHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of certain hydroelectric projects located in the State of

West Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

6 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

7 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to Federal Energy

8 Regulatory Commission projects numbered 6901, 6902,

9 and 7307, the Commission may, at the request of the

10 project licensee, and after reasonable notice, in accordance
2

•HR 5072 IH

1 with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest re2 quirements of that section and the Commission’s proce3 dures under that section, extend the time period required

4 for commencement of construction of the project con5 cerned for 3 consecutive 2-year periods.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Each extension under sub7 section (a) shall take on the date of the expiration of the

8 extension issued by the Commission under section 13 of

9 the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) of the period re10 quired for commencement of construction of the project

11 concerned.

12 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the

13 period required for commencement of construction of a

14 project described in subsection (a) has expired before the

15 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall

16 reinstate the license for that project effective as of the

17 date of its expiration and the first extension authorized

18 under subsection (a) for that project shall take effect on

19 the date of such expiration.

Æ
#### § 101-26.509 Tabulating machine cards.

Procurement by Federal agencies of tabulating machine cards shall be made in accordance with the provisions of this § 101-26.509.

[37 FR 24113, Nov. 14, 1972]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the periodic report of Endocare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, Michael R. Rodriguez, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Date: March 15, 2005
    /s/ Michael R. RodriguezMichael R. RodriguezSenior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cause No. 14-13-01020- CR

In the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas

at Houston

REGINALD BROUSSARD Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Pursuant to Rules 68.2(c), 10.5(b) and 9.3(b) Appellant respectfully requests this Court to grant this motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review, and offers the following facts in support of this request:

1. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed in t he Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas on February 3, 2015. No motion for rehearing was filed.

2. Appellant’s Petition For Discretionary Review was due on March 5, 2015.

3. No previous extension has been requested. The undersigned attorney is responsible for several other appeals and needed additional time to prepare a petition.

4. The undersigned respectfully requests an extension for 30 days until April

6 , 2015, to file his Petition for Discretionary Review which will be filed under separate cover. PD-0282-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
Transmitted 3/13/2015 6:32:35 PM Accepted 3/18/2015 10:33:11 AM

ABEL ACOSTA
CLERK2

Appellant respectfully prays this Honorable Court grant his motion for extension

of time to file his petition for discretionary review.

Respectfully submitted,

____ /s/ Casey Garrett

___ _ Casey Garrett 4010 Bluebonnet, Ste. 204
Houston, Texas 770 25 (713) 228

- 3800

Texas Bar No. 00787197

C asey. garrett@sbcglobal.net3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been served

through the e

- file system to the following recipient :

Ha rris County Office of the District Attorney Appellate Division 1201 Franklin, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77002

____ /s/ Casey Garrett

____ Casey Garrett 4010 Bluebonnet, Ste. 204 Houston, Texas 770 25 (713) 228

- 3800

Texas Bar No. 00787197
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5668

To repeal provisions of Federal law requiring labeling on saccharin containing

foods.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 15, 2000

Mr. KNOLLENBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To repeal provisions of Federal law requiring labeling on

saccharin containing foods.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saccharin Warning

5 Elimination via Environmental Testing Employing

6 Science and Technology Act’’ or the ‘‘SWEETEST Act’’.

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

8 (a) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that—

9 (1) the National Institute of Environmental

10 Health Sciences and the National Toxicology Pro-
2

•HR 5668 IH

1 gram of the National Institutes of Health have re2 viewed the scientific data concerning the human

3 health effects related to saccharin consumption

4 using technology and sound science and have con5 cluded that saccharin is not a human health risk;

6 and

7 (2) the Secretary of Health and Human Serv8 ices has removed saccharin from its 9th report of

9 carcinogens.

10 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the amendments

11 made by this Act is to eliminate the Federal warning la12 bels required on foods containing saccharin.

13 SEC. 3. REPEALS.

14 (a) FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT.—

15 Section 403(o) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

16 Act (21 U.S.C. 343(o)) is repealed.

17 (b) SACCHARIN STUDY AND LABELING ACT.—Sub18 sections (c) and (d) of the Saccharin Study and Labeling

19 Act (21 U.S.C. 343a) are repealed.

Æ