alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Silverstar Holdings, Ltd. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), the undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: October 14, 2008

 

 

| /s/ Clive Kabatznik                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Clive Kabatznik, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                          |

 

 

 

Dated: October 14, 2008

 

| /s/ Lawrence R. Litowitz                      |
|-----------------------------------------------|
| Lawrence R. Litowitz, Chief Financial Officer |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  |
Case 9:22-cv-81387-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2022 Page 1 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81387-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2022 Page 2 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81387-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2022 Page 3 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81387-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2022 Page 4 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81387-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2022 Page 5 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81387-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2022 Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints John J. Wellik his true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may
be, of United Surgical Partners International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully
to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that each of said attorney-in-fact or its substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.




                                                /s/ Mark A. Kopser
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Mark A. Kopser


                                                February 18, 2004
2
3
4
5
6
7

9
10
11
12

••••
13

••••••••••

ABC Organization
14

••

16

•••
17

19

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

•••••
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36

•••••
37

••••••
38
39
40

•
EXHIBIT 99.2

                 Form of Section 906 Certification

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Annual Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Teresa Dickey, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.


/s/ Teresa Dickey
Teresa Dickey
Principal Financial Officer

Date:  April 15, 2003
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5532

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require that foods

containing known allergens bear labeling that states that fact and the

names of the allergens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 24, 2000

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to

require that foods containing known allergens bear labeling that states that fact and the names of the allergens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Food Allergen Con5 sumer Protection Act’’.
2

•HR 5532 IH

1 SEC. 2. FOOD LABELING; REQUIREMENT OF STATEMENT

2 REGARDING KNOWN ALLERGENS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 403 of the Federal Food,

4 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 343) is amended by

5 adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(t) If it contains a known allergen unless its labeling

7 bears a statement with appropriate prominence providing

8 that fact and the name of the allergen. Notwithstanding

9 paragraph (g) or (i), the applicability of such labeling re10 quirement includes applicability to a known allergen con11 tained in spices, flavorings, or colors. For purposes of this

12 paragraph, the term ‘known allergen’ means milk; eggs;

13 fish; crustacea; mollusks; tree nuts; wheat; and peanuts,

14 soybeans, and other legumes. Such term includes in addi15 tion such foods as the Secretary may by regulation deter16 mine cause a serious allergenic response.’’.

17 (b) APPLICABILITY TO CERTAIN FOOD ADDITIVES.—

18 With respect to the authority under section 403(i) of the

19 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to establish exemp20 tions regarding food labeling, the Secretary of Health and

21 Human Services may not consider any known allergen (as

22 defined pursuant to the amendment made by subsection

23 (a)) to be an additive that qualifies for the exemption de24 scribed in section 101.100(a)(3) of title 21, Code of Fed25 eral Regulations (relating to incidental additives that are
3

•HR 5532 IH

1 present in food at insignificant levels and do not have any

2 technical or functional effect).

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 This Act and the amendments made by this Act take

5 effect upon the expiration of the 180-day period beginning

6 on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT A

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/ 

CERTIFICATION OF ANDREW B. BRETTLER

I, Andrew B. Brettler, hereby certify pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing 

the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and Discipline of Attorneys of the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Florida, that (1) I have studied the Local Rules of the United 

States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; (2) I am a member in good standing of 

the Bar of the States of California, New York, and New Jersey; and (3) I have not filed any motions 

for pro hac vice admission in this District within the last 365 days. 

Date: January 31, 2023 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Andrew B. Brettler

Andrew B. Brettler

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 2 of 2
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is

not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,

and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value

consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 25, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL E. MCKINZY, SR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

INTERSTATE BRANDS

CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-3280

(D.C. No. 2:08-CV-02649-CM-JPO)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before HARTZ, McKAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Pro se plaintiff Michael E. McKinzy, Sr., appeals from the district court’s

order dismissing his discrimination lawsuit against his former employer, Interstate

Brands Corporation, as a sanction for disobeying the court’s discovery orders. 

Mr. McKinzy never addresses the district court’s order that dismissed his

lawsuit as a sanction; instead he complains about its earlier orders denying,
-2-

without prejudice, his motions to amend his complaint and for summary

judgment. However, these orders have no affect on the outcome and we will not

consider them on appeal. Orr v. City of Albuquerque, 417 F.3d 1144, 1154

(10th Cir. 2005). 

As to the order of dismissal, Mr. McKinzy never mentions it in his brief,

and perforce, never explains any error. “We routinely have declined to consider

arguments that are not raised, or are inadequately presented, in an appellant’s

opening brief. Stated differently, the omission of an issue in an opening brief

generally forfeits appellate consideration of that issue.” Bronson v. Swensen, 500

F.3d 1099, 1104 (10th Cir. 2007) (citations omitted). 

The appeal is DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 51 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 51

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking a child 
                   hostage in order to evade arrest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 1999

  Mrs. Kelly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit taking a child 
                   hostage in order to evade arrest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHILD HOSTAGE-TAKING TO EVADE ARREST OR OBSTRUCT JUSTICE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1205. Child hostage-taking to evade arrest or obstruct justice
    ``(a) In General.--Whoever uses force or threatens to use force 
against any officer or agency of the Federal Government, and seizes or 
detains, or continues to detain, a child in order to--
            ``(1) obstruct, resist, or oppose any officer of the United 
        States, or other person duly authorized, in serving, or 
        attempting to serve or execute, any legal or judicial writ, 
        process, or warrant of any court of the United States; or
            ``(2) compel any department or agency of the Federal 
        Government to do or to abstain from doing any act;
or attempts to do so, shall be punished in accordance with subsection 
(b).
    ``(b) Sentencing.--Any person who violates subsection (a)--
            ``(1) shall be imprisoned not less than 10 years and not 
        more than 25 years;
            ``(2) if injury results to the child as a result of the 
        violation, shall be imprisoned not less than 20 years and not 
        more than 35 years; and
            ``(3) if death results to the child as a result of the 
        violation, shall be subject to the penalty of death or be 
        imprisoned for life.
    ``(c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term `child' 
means an individual who has not attained the age of 18 years.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 55 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``1205. Child hostage-taking to evade arrest or obstruct justice.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5110 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5110

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street in 
   Riverside, California, as the ``George E. Brown, Jr. United States 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street in 
Riverside, California, shall be known and designated as the ``George E. 
Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George E. 
Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 101-26.505-2 Description of office and household furnishings. ( a ) Office furnishings are articles which supplement office furniture and augment the utility of the space assigned. These articles include lamps, desk trays, smoking stands, waste receptacles, carpets, and rugs.
( b ) Household furnishings are articles which supplement household furniture and add to the comfort or utility of the space assigned. Such articles include lamps, mirrors, carpets, rugs, and plastic shower and window curtains.
[33 FR 14959, Oct. 5, 1968]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Worker's Budgets in the United States : City Families and Single Persons, 1946 and 1947

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Worker's Budgets in the United States : City Families and Single Persons, 1946 and 1947 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 927*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1948,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4365,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 101-29.502 Use of Federal specifications and interim Federal specifications in Federal construction contracts.

When material, equipment, or services covered by an available Federal specification or interim Federal specification are specified in connection with Federal construction, the Federal specification or interim Federal specification shall be made part of the specification for the construction contract, subject to provisions in §§ 101-29.402, 101-29.403, and 101-29.501.
§ 955.16 Interrogatories to parties, admission of facts, and production and inspection of documents. ( a ) *Interrogatories to parties.* After an appeal has been filed with the Board, a party may serve on the other party written interrogatories to be answered separately in writing, signed under oath and returned within 30 days. Upon timely objection, the Board will determine the extent to which the interrogatories will be permitted. The scope and use of interrogatories will be controlled by § 955.15.
( b ) *Admission of facts.* After an appeal has been filed with the Board, a party may serve upon the other party a request for the admission of specified facts. Within 30 days after service, the party served shall answer each requested fact or file objections thereto. The factual propositions set out in the request may be ordered by the Board as deemed admitted upon the failure of a party to respond timely and fully to the request for admissions.
( c ) *Production and inspection of documents.* After an appeal has been filed with the Board, a party may serve on the other party written requests for the production, inspection, and copying of any documents, electronically stored information, or things, to be answered within 30 days. Upon timely objection, the Board will determine the extent to which the requests must be satisfied, and if the parties cannot themselves agree thereon, the Board shall specify just terms and conditions of compliance.
#### § 102-118.90 If my agency orders transportation and/or transportation services with a Government contractor issued charge card or charge account citation, is this subject to prepayment audit?

Generally, no transportation or transportation services ordered with a Government contractor issued charge card or charge account citation can be prepayment audited because the bank or charge card contractor pays the TSP directly, before your agency receives a bill that can be audited from the charge card company. However, if your agency contracts with the charge card or charge account provider to provide for a prepayment audit, then, as long as your agency is not liable for paying the bank for improper charges (as determined by the prepayment audit verification process), a prepayment audit can be used. As with all prepayment audit programs, the charge card prepayment audit must be approved by the GSA Transportation Audits Division prior to implementation. If the charge card contract does not provide for a prepayment audit, your agency must submit the transportation line items on the charge card to the GSA Transportation Audits Division for a postpayment audit.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32324, May 31, 2022]
§ 966.10 Initial decision. ( a ) After the receipt of written submissions or after the conclusion of the hearing and the receipt of any post-hearing briefs, the Hearing Official shall issue a written initial decision, including findings of fact and conclusions of law, which the Hearing Official relied upon in determining whether the former employee is indebted to the Postal Service, or in upholding or revising the administrative offset schedule proposed by the Postal Service for collecting a former employee's debt. When the Judicial Officer presides at a hearing he or she shall issue a final or a tentative decision.
( b ) The Hearing Official shall promptly send to each party a copy of the initial or tentative decision, and a statement describing the right of appeal to the Judicial Officer in accordance with § 966.11.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60409 Summary Calendar

ABDELHAMID BELLI, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

____________________________________________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A 74 697 691

_____________________________________________

March 25, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Abdelhamid Belli appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. After reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that Belli is not eligible for asylum and withholding of deportation. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, Belli’s petition for review is DENIED.No. -2- PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 1, 2021

No. 04-21-00121-CV

WESTOVER CONTINUING CARE CENTER LTD. CO.

d/b/a Windemere at Westover Hills; Cantex Health Care Centers III, LLC; and Cantex 

Continuing Care Network, LLC f/k/a Cantex Senior Communities, LLC,

Appellants

v.

Suzanne Smith ADAMS, Independent Executor of the Estate of John Parker Smith, Deceased,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI11249

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, Appellee’s motion to dismiss is 

GRANTED. This appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. Appellants’ request 

for alternative relief is DENIED. 

We tax costs of court for this appeal against Appellants Westover Continuing Care Center 

Ltd. Co. d/b/a Windemere at Westover Hills; Cantex Health Care Centers III, LLC; and Cantex 

Continuing Care Network, LLC f/k/a Cantex Senior Communities, LLC.

It is so ORDERED on December 1, 2021.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of December, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 08-7236 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW KEVIN MORRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,

Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00012-JPB-DJJ-1)

Submitted: September 16, 2008 Decided: September 24, 2008

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Kevin Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,

Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 2 

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Kevin Morris appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Morris, No. 3:06-cr-00012-

JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W. Va. May 29 and July 11, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### §§ 102-3.15-102-3.20 [Reserved]