alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          30,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,769
<INVENTORY>                                     31,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,789
<PP&E>                                         148,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,877
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   279,233
<SALES>                                        228,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,663
<CGS>                                          163,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,529
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,376
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,513)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,863
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52


</TABLE>
#### HENRY WOODIN, Plaintiff in Error, *v.*THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Defendants in Error.

*Writ of error —judgment.*

A writ of error to review a conviction in an inferior criminal court, will be dismissed when no judgment or judgment record has been entered, or is returned to the court issuing the writ.

*Dawson*v. *The People*(5 Park. Crim. R, 118); *Ilild&rbrand*v. *The People*(8 N. T. S. C. [1 Hun], 19) followed.

Writ of error to tlie Court of Sessions of the county of Ontario, to review the conviction of the plaintiff in error of subornation of perjury.

*H. G.*La/pham, for plaintiff in error. *Edwin*Hicks, for defendants in error. .

Opinion by

Smith, J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Gilbert, JJ.

Writ of error dismissed.
Corporation for National and Community Service

Board of Directors

Resolution

WHEREAS, Rick Christman has served with dedication and distinction as a Member of 

the Board of Directors for the Corporation for National and Community Service for two 

terms, from April 2012 to May 2013, and again from March 2015 to October 2018; and

WHEREAS, Rick Christman has provided excellent insight and guidance to the agency 

on a wide range of subjects, especially on matters related to management and operations, 

advancing the agency’s goals of becoming more effective, efficient, and accountable; and 

WHEREAS, Rick Christman has dedicated his life to the service of others and to this 

nation, serving in numerous advisory positions to local, state, and national government 

commissions and associations, and leading an organization to expand opportunity and 

provide meaningful employment to people with developmental disabilities; and 

WHEREAS, Rick Christman’s extensive experience leading an organization to support 

people with disabilities has provided valuable insights and wisdom about service delivery 

that he has shared with agency leaders; and 

WHEREAS, Rick Christman has been an effective and passionate advocate for national 

service and volunteering in his home state of Kentucky, and among our nation’s leaders, 

including Members of Congress; and 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, this 19th day of September, 2018, that the Board of 

Directors for the Corporation for National and Community Service, with great respect 

and affection, gratefully recognizes the outstanding contributions of Rick Christman as a 

member of the Board of Directors.

Shamina Singh

Chair

Resolution 2018-02
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-CR-80173-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

 Plaintiff,

vs.

WILLIAM SPEARMAN,

 Defendant.

 / 

DEFENDANT’S PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS

Defendant, WILLIAM SPEARMAN, through counsel submits the following 

proposed voir dire questions:

1. Have you or any close friend or family member been the victim of any sexual 

assault, sexual molestation, or sexual harassment? 

a. Please briefly describe the circumstances of that experience. 

b. How do you think that experience would affect you if you serve as a juror 

and have to weigh the evidence and apply the law in this case?

2. Are you a parent or caretaker of children? 

a. This case involves the alleged sexual exploitation of children, some of them 

very young. How do you think your experience as a parent or caretaker of 

children will impact your ability to be fair and impartial in this particular 

case?

3. Knowing that, if you are selected as a juror on this case, you will be required 

to view videos and photographs of children being sexually abused, do you think 

you will still be able to remain fair and impartial and follow the Court’s 

instructions on the law? 

a. Do you believe you could remain fair and impartial and follow those 

instructions even if doing so would require you to find the defendant not 

guilty? 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 120 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 1 of 3
4. Mr. Spearman has the absolute right not to testify in his own defense and, if 

he chooses to exercise that right, the law requires you not to hold it against 

him. Still, some people think that if a defendant does not testify, he must be 

hiding something while other people think that if he does testify, he must be 

lying. What do you think?

5. You will hear a recorded statement in this case allegedly made by the 

defendant. After you do, I will instruct you that you must consider that 

evidence with caution and great care. Do you have any thoughts about why the 

law requires you to consider that evidence so carefully? Please explain those 

thoughts.

Respectfully submitted,

MICHAEL CARUSO

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

s/Scott Berry 

Scott Berry, B.C.S.

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Attorney for Defendant

Bar Number: 0525561

250 South Australian Avenue

Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Phone: (561) 833-6288

Email: scott_berry@fd.org

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 120 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY certify that on May 15, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices 

of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for 

those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of 

Electronic Filing.

s/ Scott Berry 

 Scott Berry

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 120 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 3 of 3
§ 384.1 What is the purpose of these regulations? ( a ) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” issued July 14, 1982 and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement applicable provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968.
( b ) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on state processes and on state, areawide, regional and local coordination for review of proposed federal financial assistance and direct federal development.
( c ) These regulations are intended to aid the internal management of the Corps of Engineers, and are not intended to create any right or benefit enforceable at law by a party against the Corps of Engineers or its officers.
#### § 955.21 Nature of hearings.

Hearings shall be as informal as may be reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances. The Board may exclude evidence to avoid unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, undue delay, waste of time, or presentation of irrelevant, immaterial or cumulative evidence. Although the Board will consider the Federal Rules of Evidence as described in § 955.14(d), letters or copies thereof, affidavits, or other evidence not ordinarily admissible under the Federal Rules, may be admitted in the discretion of the Board. The weight to be attached to evidence presented in any particular form will be within the discretion of the Board, taking into consideration all the circumstances of the particular case. Stipulations of fact agreed upon by the parties may be accepted as evidence at the hearing. The parties may stipulate the testimony that would be given by a witness if the witness were present. The Board may in any case require evidence in addition to that offered by the parties. A party requiring the use of a foreign language interpreter allowing testimony to be taken in English for itself or witnesses it proffers is responsible for making all necessary arrangements and paying all costs and expenses associated with the use of an interpreter.
#### § 310.4 Responsibility of carriers.

Private carriers are cautioned to make sure that their carriage of matter is lawful within the definition, exceptions, suspension, and conditions contained in this part and in part 320 of this chapter. They should take reasonable measures to inform their customers of the contents of these regulations so that only proper matter is tendered to them for carriage. Carriers should desist from carrying any matter when the form of shipment, identity of sender or recipient, or any other information reasonably accessible to them indicates that matter tendered to them for carriage is not proper under these regulations.
Exhibit 31.2

               CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB


     I, Joanna Hoover, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of ITIS
Holdings Inc., a Nevada Corporation;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004
---------------------

/s/ Joanna Hoover
-----------------
Name: Joanna Hoover
Title: Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration


Working Group on Benefit Continuity After Organizational 
Restructuring, Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension 
Benefits Plans; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting will be held Tuesday, July 18, 2000, of the Advisory 
Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans Working Group 
assigned to study benefit continuity after organizational 
restructuring.
    The session will take place in Room N-5437 A-D, U.S. Department of 
Labor Building, Second and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20210. The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 2 p.m. to 
approximately 4:30 p.m., is for working group members to continue 
taking testimony from plan sponsors who will describe their experiences 
during restructuring and the issues they faced in any effort to 
maintain continuity of benefits during their organization's 
restructuring.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before July 10, 
2000, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or representatives of organizations 
wishing to address the Working Group should forward their request to 
the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations 
will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement may be 
submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who need 
special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by July 10, at 
the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before July 10.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 12th day of June 2000.
Leslie B. Kramerich,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-15150 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that The Moskowitz Law Firm PLLC, counsel for plaintiffs in 

the above-entitled action, has changed its mailing address. The new address is:

The Moskowitz Law Firm, PLLC

Continental Plaza

3250 Mary Street

Suite 202

Miami, FL 33133

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 653409

Miami, FL 33175

Dated: June 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

 By: /s/ Joseph M. Kaye

Joseph M. Kaye

Florida Bar No. 117520

The Moskowitz Law Firm, PLLC

Continental Plaza

3250 Mary Street, Suite 202

Miami, FL 33133

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 653409

Miami, FL 33175

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 215 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 1, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, by using the 

CM/ECF system, which will serve a copy of same on all counsel of record.

 By: /s/ Joseph M. Kaye

Joseph M. Kaye

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 215 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 2 of 2
James J. Hartnett

Will Ford Hartnett

Jim Hartnett, Jr.

Jay David Hartnett

Fred Hartnett

Melinda J. Hartnett*

Tanner Hartnett

THE

HARTNETT

LAW FIRM

January 21, 2015

Via U. S. Regular Mail

Clerk ofthe Court

Fourth Court of Appeals

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200

San Antonio. Texas 78205-3037

Re: No 04-14-00110-CVIMary Moczygemba v. Thomas J. Moczygemba andHarry

Lee Moczygemba

Dear Clerk ofthe Court:

We would like to purchase an audio cd of the Oral Argument in the above-referenced

matter that took place on January 21, 2015. Enclosed is a check for $5.00 for this cd. I have also

enclosed a postage-paid return envelope.

Thank you in advance for your assistance and let me know if you need additional

information.

Very truly yours,

2920 North Pearl Street

Dallas, Texas 75201

www.hartnettlawfirm.com

(214) 742-4655

(214) 855-7857 Fax

121

r-o

a=> ••••-* i

"... iCn '.'" r^i - ""-— J '•*- C— -'••- -••) p» ^"""•« s>

"l •••• "ZZ. r>« : •-•

-' ro -" :' -

CO -••-•r^

rvN, ••" —

Z2 1 -.

1 -">•-- "Z£L

E*"*'—. ro . •' •-

CO

Toni Napier

Legal Assistant to Jim Hartnett, Jr.

Pdr?-c

An

Enclosures

&3//S

'Licensed to practice in Texas and New York
§ 3050.1 Definitions applicable to this part. ( a ) *Accepted analytical principle* refers to an analytical principle that was applied by the Commission in its most recent Annual Compliance Determination unless a different analytical principle subsequently was accepted by the Commission in a final rule.
( b ) *Accepted quantification technique* refers to a quantification technique that was applied in the most recent iteration of the periodic report applying that quantification technique or was used to support a new analytical principle adopted in a subsequent rule 3050.11 proceeding.
( c ) *Analytical principle* refers to a particular economic, mathematical, or statistical theory, precept, or assumption applied by the Postal Service in producing a periodic report to the Commission.
( d ) *Annual Compliance Determination* refers to the report that 39 U.S.C. 3653 requires the Commission to issue each year evaluating the compliance of the Postal Service.
( e ) *Annual periodic reports to the Commission* refers to all of the reports that the Postal Service is required to provide to the Commission each year.
( f ) *Quantification technique* refers to any data entry or manipulation technique whose validity does not require the acceptance of a particular economic, mathematical, or statistical theory, precept, or assumption. A change in quantification technique should not change the output of the analysis in which it is employed.
( g ) *Section 3652 report* refers to the annual compliance report provided by the Postal Service to the Commission pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3652, but does not include the reports required by 39 U.S.C. 2803 and 2804.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5521

To amend title 31, United States Code, to expand the types of Federal

agencies that are required to prepare audited financial statements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 2000

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 31, United States Code, to expand the types

of Federal agencies that are required to prepare audited

financial statements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accountability of Tax

5 Dollars Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS RELATING TO AUDITING REQUIRE7 MENT FOR FEDERAL AGENCY FINANCIAL

8 STATEMENTS.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3515 of title 31, United

10 States Code, is amended—
2

•HR 5521 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)—

2 (A) by striking ‘‘Not later’’ and inserting

3 ‘‘(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B),

4 not later’’;

5 (B) by striking ‘‘each executive agency

6 identified in section 901(b) of this title’’ and in7 serting ‘‘each covered executive agency’’;

8 (C) by striking ‘‘1997’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘2001’’;

10 (D) by inserting ‘‘the Congress and’’ after

11 ‘‘submit to’’; and

12 (E) by adding at the end the following:

13 ‘‘(B) A covered executive agency is not required to

14 prepare an audited financial statement under this section

15 for any fiscal year for which the total amount of budget

16 authority available to the agency is less than

17 $25,000,000.’’;

18 (2) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘an executive

19 agency’’ and inserting ‘‘a covered executive agency’’;

20 (3) in subsection (c) and (d) by striking ‘‘execu21 tive agencies’’ each place it appears and inserting

22 ‘‘covered executive agencies’’;

23 (4) by striking subsections (e), (f), (g), and (h);

24 and

25 (5) by adding at the end the following:
3

•HR 5521 IH

1 ‘‘(e) The term ‘covered executive agency’—

2 ‘‘(1) means an executive agency that is not re3 quired by another provision of Federal law to pre4 pare and submit to the Congress and the Director

5 of the Office of Management and Budget an audited

6 financial statement for each fiscal year, covering all

7 accounts and associated activities of each office, bu8 reau, and activity of the agency; and

9 ‘‘(2) does not include a corporation, agency, or

10 instrumentality subject to chapter 91 of this title.’’.

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 3521(f) of

12 title 31, United States Code, is amended—

13 (1) by striking ‘‘(1)’’;

14 (2) by striking ‘‘subsections (a) and (f)’’ and

15 inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’; and

16 (3) by striking paragraph (2).

Æ