GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - M/Vrch 2011 

GLP10-01-02: Interim Report 14 - Analysis of PFBS. PFHS. and PFOS in Groundwater 

Samples Collected at the BFI Morris Farm Landfill located in Hillsboro. AL in March 2011 

Study Title 

Analysis of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHS) and 

Perfluorobutane Sulfonate (PFBS) in Groundwater, Soil and Sediment for the 3M Decatur Phase 3 

Site-Related Monitoring Program 

Data Requirement 

EPA TSCA Good Laboratory Practice Standards 40 CFR Part 792 

Study Director 

Jaisimha Kesari P.E., DEE 

Weston Solutions, Inc. 

1400 Weston Way 

Westchester, PA 19380 

Phone:610-701-3761 

Author 

Susan Wolf 

3M Environmental Laboratory 

Interim Report Completion Date 

Date of signing 

Performing Laboratory 

3M Environmental Health and Safety Operations 

Environmental Laboratory 

3M Center, BIdg 260-05-N-17 

Maplewood, MN 55144 

Project Identification 

GLP10-01-02-14 

Total Number of Pages 

89 

The testing reported herein meet the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025-2005 "General Requirements for the 

Competence of Testing and Calibration L.aix>ratories", in accordance with the A2LA Certificate #2052.01. 

Testing that compiles with this Intemational Standard also operate in accordance with ISO 9001:2000. 

Testing Cert #2052.01 

Page 1 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS In Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

This page has been reserved for specific country requirements. 

Page 2 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

GLP COMPLIANCE STATEMENT 

Report Title: Interim Report 14 Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater Samples 

Collected at the BFI Monis Famn Landflll located in Hillsboro, AL in March 2011 

Study: Analysis of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHS) and 

Perfluorobutane Sulfonate (PFBS) in Groundwater, Soil and Sediment for the 3M Decatur Phase 3 

Site-Related Monitoring Program. 

This analytical phase was conducted in compliance with Toxic Substances ContnDl Act (TSCA) Good 

Laboratory Practice (GLP) Standards, 40 CFR 792, with the exceptions listed below: 

• These are environmental samples where there is no specific test substance, no specific test 

system and no dosing of a test system. 

• The reference substances have not been characterized under the GLPs and the stability under 

storage conditions at the test site have not been detemnined under GLPs. 

by 

Gary Hoh|enstei|, Sponsor Representative Date 

Jaisimha KSSaiT, P.E., DEE, Study Director ' Date 

Page 3 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT 

Report Title: Interim Report 14 Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Ground Water Samples 

Collected at the BFI Monis Fami Landfill in Hillsboro, AL in March 2011 

Study: Analysis of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHS) and 

Perfluorobutane Sulfonate (PFBS) in Groundwater, Soil and Sediment for the 3M Decatur Phase 3 

Site-Related Monitoring Program. 

This analytical phase was audited by the 3M Environmental Laboratory Quality Assurance Unit (QAU), 

as indicated in the following table. The findings were reported to the principal investigator (P.I.), 

laboratory management and study director. 

Inspection Dates 

4/8/11,4/11/11,4/12/11 

LA<U. 

Phase 

Data / Interim Report 

/yU^/ 

Date Reported to 

Testing Facility 

Managennent 

4/25/11 

study Director 

4/25/11 

G'J2(~I( 

QAU I res^ti Date 

Page 4 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

GLP Compliance statement 3 

Quality Assurance Statement 4 

Table of Contents 5 

List of Tables 6 

1 Study Infomiation 8 

2 Summary 9 

3 Introduction 10 

4 Test & Control Substances 11 

5 Reference Substances.. 11 

6 Test System 13 

7 Method Summary 13 

7.1 Methods 13 

7.2 Sample Collection 13 

7.3 Sample Preparation 14 

7.4 Analysis 14 

8 Analytical Results 15 

8.1 Calibration 15 

8.2 System Suitability 16 

8.3 Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) 16 

8.4 Continuing Calibration 16 

8.5 Blanks 16 

8.6 Lab Control Spikes (LCSs) 16 

8.7 Analytical Method Uncertainty 20 

8.8 Field Matrix Spikes (FMS) 20 

8.9 Laboratory Matrix Spikes (LMS) 21 

Page 5 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

9 Data Summary and Discussion 21 

10 Conclusion 31 

11 Data/Sample Retention 31 

12 /attachments 31 

13 Signatures 32 

LIST OF TABLES 

Table 1. Summarized PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS Results (MFL Groundwater, March 2011) 10 

Table 2. Sample Description Key Code 13 

Table 3. Instrument Parameters 14 

Table 4. Liquid Chromatography Conditions 14 

Table 5. Mass Transitions 15 

Table 6. Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) 16 

Table 7. Laboratory ContnDl Spike Recovery 18 

Table 7 continued. Laboratory Control Spike Recovery 19 

Tables. Analytical Uncertainty 20 

Table 9. DAL GW MFL MW01 0110322 22 

Table 10. DAL GW MFL MW01D0 110322 22 

Table 11. DAL GW MFL MW02 0110322 23 

Table 12. DAL GW MFL MW02D0 110322 23 

Table 13. DAL GW MFL MW03 0 110323 24 

Table 14. DAL GW MFL MW03D0 110323 24 

Table 15. DAL GWMFLMW04 0110323 25 

Table 16. DALGWMFLMW04D0 110323 26 

Table 17. DAL GW MFL MW05 0 110323 26 

Table 18. DAL GW MFL MW05D0 110323 27 

Table 19. DAL GW MFL MW10 0 110322 27 

Page 6 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 20. DAL GW MFL MW10D0 110322 28 

Table 21. DAL GW MFL MW13 0110323 28 

Table 22. DAL GW MFL MW13D 0110323 29 

Table 23. Trip Blank 29 

Table 24. Rinseate Blanks 30 

Page 7 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

1 Study Information 

Sponsor 

3M Company 

Sponsor Representative 

Gary Hohenstein 

3M EHS Operations 

3M Building 224-5W-03 

Saint Paul, MN 55144-1000 

Phone:(651)737-3570 

Study Director 

Jaisimha Kesari, P.E., DEE 

Weston Solutions, Inc. 

Westchester, PA 19380 

Phone:(610)701-3761 

Fax:(610)701-7401 

j . kesari@westonsolutions.com 

Study Location 

Testing Facility 

3M EHS Operations 

3M Environmental Laboratory 

Building 260-5N-17 

Maplewood, MN 55106 

Study Personnel 

William K. Reagen, Ph.D., 3M Laboratory Manager 

Cleston Lange, Ph.D., Principal Analytical Investigator, (clanqe@mmm.com): phone (651)-733-9860 

Susan Wolf, 3M Analyst 

Kevin Eich; Analyst 

Chelsie Grochow, Analyst 

Jonathan Steege; Analyst 

Study Dates 

Study Initiation: March 8,2010 

Interim 14 Experimental Temnination: April 4,2011 

Amended Interim Report Completion: Date of Interim Report Signing 

Location of Archives 

All original raw data and the analytical report have been archived at the 3M Environmental 

Laboratory according to 40 CFR Part 792. The test substance and analytical reference standard 

reserve samples are archived at the 3M Environmental Laboratory according to 40 CFR Part 792 

Page 8 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Monris Farni Landfill - MArch 2011 

2 Summar y 

The 3M EnvinDnmental Laboratory received groundwater samples from wells located at the BFI Morris 

Farni Landfill in Hillsboro, AL. A total of sixty sample bottles were received at the 3M Environmental 

Laboratory for perfiuorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHS) and 

perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS), and included duplicate groundwater samples from each sampling 

location. Samples also included two field matrix spike (FMS) samples for each location, one trip blank 

set containing RO water and appnDpriate trip blank spikes, and one equipment rinseate blank. The 

equipment rinseate blank did not have FMS samples prepared for detennination of PFBS, PFHS, and 

PFOS recovery. All sample bottles also included the addition of ^®02-PFBS, ^^Ca-PFHS, and ^^CsPFOS (intemal standards) and ^^C4-PF0S (sunogate spike). 

The groundwater samples, trip blank and equipment rinseate blank associated with GLP10-01 -02-14 

were received from Weston personnel on March 24,2011. All of the samples were prepared and 

analyzed for PFBS, PFHS, PFOS, and ^^C4-PF0S following 3M Environmental Laboratory Method 

ETS-8-044.0 and conducted under 3M pnDject GLP-10-01-02-014. The average measured PFBS, 

PFHS, and PFOS concentrations are summarized in Table 1. The equipment rinseate blank and the 

trip blank were below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ), indicating adequate control of sample 

contamination during shipping and sample collections. 

The PFBS concentration results for all samples ranged from <0.0250 ng/mL to 5.03 ng/mL. The PFHS 

concentration results for all sample ranged from <0.0250 ng/mL to 12.8 ng/mL. The PFOS 

concentrafion results for all sample ranged fi-om <0.0300 ng/mL to 22.5 ng/mL. The analytical method 

uncertainties associated with the reported results are: PFBS + 15%, PFHS + 11% and PFOS + 23%. 

For some samples, the method uncertainty was expanded for PFOS to + 36% and expanded for PFHS 

to + 34%. 

Page 9 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 1. Summarized PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS Results (MFL Groundwater, March 2011). 

Sampling Location 

DAL GW MFL MW01 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW01D 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW02 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW02D 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW03 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW03D 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW04 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW04D 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW05 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW05D 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW10 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW10D 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW13 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW13D 0 110323 

Trip Blanks (RO Water) 

GLP10-01-02-14 Equipment rinseate blank: 

DALGWMFLMW01 

PFBS 

Avg. Conc. 

(ng/mL) ± RPD 

<0.0250 

0.194 ±0.52% 

0.194 ±1.6% 

0.142 ±4.2% 

<0.0250 

<0.0250 

1.67 ±6.6% 

0.171 ± 10% 

1.05 ±1.0% 

0.0280 ± 3.2% 

0.0426 ±12% 

<0.0250 

4.13 ±4.4% 

5.03 ±17% 

<0.0250 

<0.0250 

PFHS 

Avg. Conc. 

(ng/mL) ± RPD 

<0.0250 

0.0533 ±11% 

0.467 ±3.0% 

0.424 ±13% 

0.0667 ±22% [a] 

<0.0250 

12.8 ±15% 

0.342 ±3.2% 

1.35 ± 5.2% [c] 

0.0323 ± 3.7% 

0.121 ±21% [a] 

0.0281 ± 15% 

1.27 ±5.5% 

1.48 ±2.0% 

<0.0250 

<0.0250 

PFOS 

Avg. Conc. 

(ng/mL) ± RPD 

<0.0300 [b] 

0.353 ± 16% [b] 

1.42 ±0.0% 

1.10 ±0.0% 

0.209 ± 14% [b] 

<0.0300 [b] 

22.5 ±3.1% 

0.184 ± 14% [b] 

2.08 ±10% 

<0.0300 [b] 

0.242 ± 14% [b] 

<0.0300 [bl 

8.28 ±1.2% 

8.68 ± 2.0% 

<0.0300 [b] 

<0.0300 [b] 

The analytical method uncertainties associated with the reported results are as follows: PFBS ± 15%, PFHS ±11% 

and PFOS ±23%. 

[a] The RPD did not meet method acceptance criteria of <20%. 

[b] The analytical uncertainty is been adjusted for PFOS to ±36%. See section 8.7 of the report for additional 

infomiation. 

[c] The analytical uncertainty is been adjusted for PFHS to ±34% based on FMS recovery. 

3 Introduction 

This analytical study was conducted as part of the Phase 3 EnvinDnmental Monitoring and Assessment 

Program for the 3M fecility located in Decatur, Alabama. The objective of the overall program is to gain 

infomnation regarding concentrations of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonate 

(PFHS) and perfluonDbutane sulfonate (PFBS), in various environmental media such as groundwater, 

soils and sediments that are associated with and near the Decatur facility. This analytical study was 

conducted to analyze ground water samples collected fi'om various wells located at the BFI Monis 

Fami Landfill in Hillsboro, AL for PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in an effort to characterize regional 

groundwater conditions. 

The 3M Environmental Laboratory prepared sample containers (250 mL high-density polyethylene 

bottles) which were shipped to Decatur, AL, Weston personnel prior to field sampling. Sample 

containers for each sampling location included a field sample, field sample duplicate, and two field 

spike samples. Each empty container was merited with a "fill to here" line to produce a final sample 

volume of 200 mL. Containers designated for field matrix samples were fortified with an appropriate 

matrix spike solution containing PFBS (linear), PFHS (linear), and PFOS (linear) prior to being sent to 

the field for sample collection. Sample bottles were also spiked with intemal standard (1.0 ng/mL 

nominal concentration) and sun-ogate (0.1 ng/mL nominal concentration). 

Page 10 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Samples were prepared and analyzed according to the procedure defined in 3M Environmental 

Laboratory method ETS-8-044.0 "Detennination of Perfluorinated Compounds In Water by High 

Perfonnance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Direct Injection Analysis". Intemal standard 

was used to aid in the data quality objectives. 

Table 1 summarizes the average PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS concentrations for the duplicate samples 

collected, the trip blank, and equipment rinseate blank. Tables 9-24 summarize the individual sample 

results and the associated FMS recoveries. All results for the quality control samples prepared and 

analyzed with the samples are reported and discussed elsewhere in this report. 

4 Test & Control Substances 

"1 

C 

There was not a test substance or control substances in the classic sense of a GLP study. This study 

was purely analytical in nature. 

5 Reference Substances 

Reference Substance 

Chemical Name 

Chemical Fomriula 

Identifier 

Source 

Expiration Date 

Storage Conditions 

Chemical Lot Number 

TCR Number 

Physical Description 

Purity 

PFBS 

(predominantly linear) 

Periluorobutane sulfonate 

C4F9SO3" 

Potassium Salt 

3M 

1/10/2017 

Frozen 

41-2600-8442-5 

TCR-121 

White Powder 

96.7% 

PFHS 

(linear) 

Perfluorohexane sulfonate 

CgFisSOa 

Sodium Salt 

Wellington 

4/2/2013 

Frozen 

LPFHXSAM08 

TCR08-0018 

Crystalline 

98% 

Page 11 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; /tended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Reference Substance 

Chemical Name 

Chemical Formula 

Identifier 

Source 

Expiration Date 

Storage Conditions 

Chemical Lot Number 

TCR Number 

Physical Description 

Purity 

PFOS 

(linear) 

Perfluorooctane sulfonate 

C8F17SO3" 

Potassium Salt 

CAS #2795-39-3 

Wellington 

10/18/2013 

Frozen 

LPFOSKBM06 

TCR08-0001 

Crystalline 

98% 

PFOS 

(linear + branched) 

Perfluorooctane sulfonate 

C8F17SO3" 

Potassium Salt 

CAS #2795-39-3 

3M 

12/14/2016 

Frozen 

171 

TCR-696 

White Powder 

86.4% 

Reference Substance 

Chemical Name 

Chemical Fomiula 

Identifier 

Source 

[Expiration Date 

Storage Conditions 

Chemical Lot Number 

TCR Number 

Physical Description 

Purity 

[1802tPFBS 

(linear) 

[ 02]-Ammonium 

Perfluorobutanesulfonate 

C4F9S[^^02]0-NH/ 

NA 

RTl Intemational 

03/09/2015 

Frozen 

11546-107-2 

TCR-1032,TCR-1026 

Liquid 

>99% 

13C3-PFHS 

(linear) 

Sodium 

Perfluorohexanesulfonate 

^'Cs^'CsFisSOsNa" 

CAS#MPFC-C-0910 

Wellington 

09/28/2013 

1 Frozen | 

092310 

TCR10-0048 

Liquid 

>98% 

Page 12 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Reference Substance 

Chemical Name 

Chemical Fomnula 

Identifier 

Source 

Expiration Date 

Storage Conditions 

Chemical Lot Number 

TCR Number 

Physical Description 

Purity 

13C8-PFOS 

(linear) 

Sodium 

Perfluorooctanesulfonate 

"CsFiySOs-Na* 

CAS#MPFC-C-0910 

Wellington 

09/28/2013 

Frozen 

092310 

TCR10-0048 

Liquid 

>98% 

13C4-PFOS 

(linear) 

Sodium 

Perfluorooctanesulfonate 

"C4'^C4Fi7S03Na* 

MPFOS 

Wellington 

09/08/2013 

Frozen 

MPFOS0910 

TCR10-0044 

Liquid 

>98% 

6 Test System 

The test systems for this study are ground water samples collected from wells located in Hillsboror, AL 

by Weston Solutions, Inc. personnel. Samples for this study are "real worid" samples, not dosed with a 

specific lot of test substance. 

Table 2. Sample Description Key Code. 

String Numlser 

Example 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

String Descriptor | Example 

D/U. GWMFL MW010110322 

Sampling Location 

Sample Type 

Well ID 

Sampling Date 

Sample Type 

MFL = Monis Farni Landfill 

GW= Groundwater 

Example: MW01 

110322 = March 22,^)11 

0=primary sample 

DB=duplicate sample 

LS = low spike 

HS = high spike 

i 7 Method Summar y 

7.1 Methods 

Analysis for all analytes was completed following 3M Environmental Laboratory method ETS-8-044.0 

"Detennination of Perfluorinated Compounds In Water by High Perfonnance Liquid 

ChnDmatography/Mass Spectrometry Direct Injection Analysis". 

7.2 Sample Collection 

Samples were collected in 250 mL NalgeneTM (high-density polyethylene) bottles prepared at the 3M 

EnvinDnmental Laboratory. Sample bottles associated with GLP10-01-02-14 were returned to the 

laboratory at ambient conditions on March 24, 2011. Samples were stored refrigerated at the laboratory 

Page 13 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

after receipt. A set of laboratory prepared Trip Blank and Trip Blank field matrix spikes were sent with 

each cooler of sample collection bottles. 

7.3 Sample Preparation 

Samples were prepared by removing an aliquot of the well mixed sample and placing it in an autovial for 

analysis. 

7.4 Analysis 

All study samples and quality contnDl samples were analyzed for PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS using high 

perfomnance liquid chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS). Detailed instmment 

parameters, the liquid chromatography gradient program, and the specific mass transitions analyzed are 

described in the raw data hard copies placed in the final data packet, and are briefly described below in 

Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5. 

Table 3. Instrument Parameters. 

Instrument Name 

Analytical Method 

Analysis Date 

Liquid Chromatograph 

Guard column 

Anaiyticai column 

injection Volume 

Mass Spectrometer 

ion Source 

Electrode 

Polarity 

Software 

ETS Ginger 

ETS-8-044.0 

3/28/11-PFBS and PFHS 

Agilent 1100 

Prism RP (2.1 trim X 50 mm), 5 n 

Betasil C18 (2.1 mm X 100 mm), 5n 

10 nL 

Applied Biosystems API 5000 

Turtx) Spray 

TurtX) ion electrode 

Negative 

Analyst 1.4.2 

ETS McCoy 

ETS-8-044.0 

4/1/11,4/4/11-PFOS 

Agilent 1290 

Prism RP (2.1 mm X 50 mm), 5 n 

Betasil C18 (2.1 mm X 100 mm), 5n 

5nL 

Applied Biosystems API 5500 

TurtX) Spray 

Tuttx) ion electrode 

Negative 

Analyst 1.5.2 

Instrument Name 

AnaiyUcal Method 

Analysis Date 

Liquid Chromatograph 

Guard column 

Anaiyticai column 

Injection Volume 

Mass Spectrometer 

Ion Source 

Electrode 

Polarity 

Software 

ETS Kirk 

ETS-8-044.0 

4/4/11-PFOS 

Agilent 1200 

Prism RP (4.6 mm X 50 mm), 5 n 

Betasil C18 (4.6 mm X 100 mm), 5n 

25 nL 

/\pplied Biosystems API 5500 

TurtX) Spray 

TurtX) ion electrode 

Negative 

Analyst 1.5.2 

Page 14 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 4. Liquid Chromatography Conditions. 

step 

Number 

Total Time 

(min) 

Flow Rate 

(fiUmin) 

PercentA 

(2 mM ammonium acetate) 

PercentS 

(MethanoO 

ETS-8-044.0 Analyzed on ETS Ginger 

0 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

0 

2.0 

11.0 

14.0 

14.5 

17.0 

300 

300 

300 

300 

300 

300 

97.0 

97.0 

5.0 

5.0 

97.0 

97.0 

3.0 

3.0 

95.0 

95.0 

3.0 

3.0 

ETS-8-044.0 Analyzed on ETS McCoy 

0 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

0 

2.0 

14.5 

15.5 

16.5 

20.0 

300 

300 

300 

300 

300 

300 

ETS-8-044.0 Anah 

0 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

0 

2.0 

14.5 

15.5 

16.5 

20.0 

750 

750 

750 

750 

750 

750 

90.0 

90.0 

5.0 

5.0 

90.0 

90.0 

10.0 

10.0 

95.0 

95.0 

10.0 

10.0 

^ed on ETS Kiri< 

97.0 

97.0 

5.0 

5.0 

97.0 

97.0 

3.0 

3.0 

95.0 

95.0 

3.0 

3.0 

Table 5. Mass Transitions. 

Analyte 

PFBS 

PFHS 

PFOS 

fC^-PFOS 

surrogate 

Mass Transition 

Q1/Q3 

299/80 

299/99 

399/80 

399/99 

499/80 

499/99 

499/130 

503m 

Reference Material 

Structure 

Unear 

Unear 

Unear 

Unear 

intemaJ Standard 

fOJ-PFBS 

t'CJ-PFHS 

t'CJ-PFOS 

t'Csl-PFOS 

Mass Transition 

Q1/Q3 

303/84 

402/80 

507/80 

507/80 

Dwell time was 50 msec for each transition. The individual transitions were summed to produce a "total ion 

chromatogram" (TIC), which was used for quantitation. 

8 Analytical Results 

8.1 Calibration 

Samples were analyzed against an intemal standard calibration curve. Calibration standards were 

prepared by spiking known amounts of the stock solution containing the target analytes into prepared 

into synthetic groundwater (containing calium and magnesium). A total of fifteen spiked standards 

Page 15 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Famn Landfill - MArch 2011 

ranging fi'om 0.025 ng/mL to 75 ng/mL (nominal) were prepared, however, not all curve points were 

included in each analytical batch. Low or high curve points may have been disabled to meet method 

criteria. A quadratic, 1/x weighted, calibration cun/e of the peak area ratios was used to fit the data for 

each analyte. The data were not forced thnDugh zero during the fitting process. Calculating the 

standard concentrations using the peak area confinned accuracy of each curve point. 

Each curve point was quantitated using the overall calibration curve and reviewed for accuracy. Method 

calibration accuracy requirements of 100±25% (100±30% for the lowest curve point) were met for all 

analytes for each analytical batch. The con-elation coefficient (r) was greater than 0.995 for PFBS, 

PFHS, PFOS, and "C4-PFOS for each analytical batch. 

8.2 System Suitability 

A calibration standard was analyzed four times at the beginning of the analytical sequence to 

demonstrate overall system suitability. The acceptance criteria of less than or equal to 5% relative 

standard deviation (RSD) fiDr peak area and retention time criteria of less than or equal to 2% RSD was 

met for PFBS, PFHS, PFOS, and "C4-PFOS. 

8.3 Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) 

The LOQ for this analysis is the lowest non-zero calibration standard in the curve that meets linearity 

and accuracy requirements and fiDr which the area counts are at least twice those of the appropriate 

blanks. The LOQ for all analytes can be found in Table 6. 

Table 6. Limit of Quantitation (LOQ). 

Analysis Date 

3/28/11 

4/1/11 

4/4/11 (mcl 10404a) 

4/4/11 (k110404a) 

PFBS 

LOQ, ng/mL 

0.0250 

NA 

NA 

NA 

PFHS 

LOQ, ng/mL 

0.0250 

NA 

NA 

NA 

PFOS 

LOQ, ng/mL 

NA 

0.250 

0.100 

0.0300 

NA = Not Applicable 

8.4 Continuing Calibration 

During the course of each analytical sequence, continuing calibration verification samples (CCVs) were 

analyzed to confirm tiiat the instmment response and the initial calibration curve were still in conti'ol. All 

CCVs met method criteria of 100% ± 25% for PFBS, PFHS, PFOS, and "C4-PFOS. 

8.5 Blanks 

Three types of blanks were prepared and analyzed with the samples: procedural blanks, a trip blank and 

an equipment rinseate blank. Procedural blank results were reviewed and used to evaluate method 

perfonnance to detennine the LOQ for each analyte. The trip blank reflects the shipping and sample 

collection conditons the sample bottles and samples experience. The equipment rinseate blank is an 

aqueous sample that reflects the efficiency of equipment cleaning in the field between different sample 

collections and are proof of no cross contamination of samples firom the use of the equipment. 

8.6 Lab Control Spikes (LCSs) 

Lab control samples were prepared and analyzed in triplicate with each preparation set. LCSs were 

prepared by spiking known amounts of the analyte into synthetic groundwater to produce the desired 

concentration. The spiked water samples were tiien analyzed in the same manner as the samples. The 

method acceptance criteria, average of LCS at each level should be within 100% ± 20% with an RSD 

^0% . 

Page 16 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

3/28/11 Analysis: Low, mid, and high-level lab contnDl spikes were prepared and analyzed in tiiplicate for 

PFBS and PFHS. The LCSs met acceptance criteria for all three spiking levels. 

4/1/11 Analysis: Low, mid, and high-level lab control spikes were prepared and analyzed in triplicate for 

PFOS (linear). The low set of LCSs were below the limit of quantification, while the mid and high sets of 

LCS met acceptance criteria. 

4/4/11 Analysis (ETS Kiri<): Low, mid, and high-level lab control spikes were prepared and analyzed in 

triplicate for PFOS (linear). The low set of LCSs had a RSD of 23%, while the mid and high sets of LCS 

met acceptance criteria. 

4/4/11 Analysis (ETS McCoy): Low and high-level lab control spikes were prepared and analyzed in 

triplicate for PFOS (linear). The LCSs met acceptance criteria for both spiking levels. 

As the reference material used for quantitation of PFOS is predominantly linear, and the PFOS present 

in the water samples are comprised of both linear and branched isomers, additional LCS samples of 

PFOS (linear and branched) were prepared in triplicate to evaluate the potential for analytical bias. 

4/1/11 Analysis: Low, mid, and high-level lab control spikes were prepared and analyzed in triplicate for 

PFOS (linear and branched). The low set of LCSs were below the limit of quantification, while the mid 

and high sets of LCS met acceptance criteria. 

4/4/11 Analysis (ETS Kiri<): Low, mid, and high-level lab control spikes were prepared and analyzed in 

triplicate for PFOS (linear and branched). The low set of LCSs met acceptance criteria, while the mid 

(136%) and high-level (133%) did not meet method acceptance crieria. 

4/4/11 Analysis (ETS McCoy): Low and high-level lab control spikes were prepared and analyzed in 

triplicate for PFOS (linear and branched). The LCSs met acceptance criteria for both spiking levels. 

The 4/4/11 analysis on ETS Kiri< indicates a potential analytical bias for samples containing linear and 

branched isomers of PFOS when analyzed a calibration curve of predominantly linear PFOS. 

TherefiDre, samples analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kirt< will have an expanded uncertainty fiDr PFOS of 

±36%, based on the highest average recovery of the linear and branched LCS samples. A method 

deviation is included with the raw data. 

The fiDllowing calculations were used to generate data in Table 7 for laboratory control spikes. 

1 ^ci-, . r. Calculated Concentration . . „„„, 

LCS Percent Recovery = * 100% 

Spil<e Concentration 

LCS%RSD = standard deviation LCS replicates .^g^y^ 

average LCS recovery 

Page 17 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 7. Laboratory Control Spike Recovery. 

ETS-8-044.0 

Analyzed 3/28/11 

Lab ID 

LCS-110325-1 

LCS-110325-2 

LCS-110325-3 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110325-4 

LCS-110325-5 

LCS-110325-6 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110325-7 

LCS-110325-8 

LCS-110325-9 

Average ±%RSD 

PFBS 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.198 

0.198 

0.198 

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.226 

0.256 

0.233 

'ARecovery 

114 

129 

118 

120 ±6.5% 

1.98 

1.98 

1.98 

2.15 

2.35 

2.16 

108 

119 

109 

112% ±5.4% 

9.94 

9.94 

9.94 

12.2 

10.4 

11.7 

123 

105 

117 

115% ±8.0% 

PFHS 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.198 

0.198 

0.198 

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.197 

0.215 

0.206 

'ARecovery 

99.4 

109 

104 

104% ±4.6% 

1.98 

1.98 

1.98 

2.13 

2.09 

2.24 

108 

106 

113 

109% ±3.3% 

9.94 

9.94 

9.94 

10.3 

10.6 

9.55 

103 

107 

96.0 

102% ±5.5% 

ETS-8-044.0 

Analyzed 4/1/11 

Lab ID 

LCS-110328-1 

LCS-110328-2 

LCS-110328-3 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-4 

LCS-110328-5 

LCS-110328-6 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-7 

LCS-110328-8 

LCS-110328-9 

Average ±%RSD 

PFOS (linear) 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(na/mL) 

0.198 

0.198 

0.198 

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.250 

<0.250 

<0.250 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NA 

NA 

1.98 

1.98 

1.98 

2.07 

1.98 

2.08 

105 

100 

105 

103% ±2.8% 

9.94 

9.94 

9.94 

11.3 

11.4 

11.1 

113 

115 

111 

113% ±1.8% 

Lab ID 

LCS-110328-10 

LCS-110328-11 

LCS-110328-12 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-13 

LCS-110328-14 

LCS-110328-15 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-16 

LCS-110328-17 

LCS-110328-18 

Average ±%RSD 

PFOS (linear+branched) 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.200 

0.200 

0.200 

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.250 

<0.250 

<0.250 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NA 

NA 

2.00 

2.00 

2.00 

2.33 

2.35 

2.46 

117 

117 

123 

119% ±2.9% 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

12.0 

11.5 

11.5 

120 

115 

115 

117% ±2.5% 

NA = Not/Applicable 

Page 18 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 7 continued. Laboratory Control Spike Recovery. 

ETS-8-044.0 

Analyzed 4/1/11 

Lab ID 

LCS-110328-1 

LCS-110328-2 

LCS-110328-3 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-4 

LCS-110328-5 

LCS-110328-6 

Average ±%RSD 

"C4PFOS 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.189 

0.189 

0.189 

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.180 

0.188 

0.184 

'ARecovery 

95.0 

99.4 

97.4 

97.3% ±2.3% 

1.89 

1.89 

1.89 

1.77 

1.80 

1.76 

93.9 

95.0 

93.2 

94.0% ±1.0% 

Lab ID 

LCS-110328-10 

LCS-110328-11 

LCS-110328-12 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-13 

LCS-110328-14 

LCS-110328-15 

Average ±%RSD 

"C4PFOS 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.189 

0.189 

0.189 

Calculated 

Concerrtration 

(ng/mL) 

0.165 

0.186 

0.183 

'ARecovery 

87.1 

98.5 

96.6 

94.1% ±6.5% 

1.89 

1.89 

1.89 

1.83 

1.78 

1.92 

96.4 

93.7 

101 

97.0% ±3.8% 

ETS-8-044.0 

Analyzed 4/4/11 

(ETS McCoy) 

Lab ID 

LCS-110328-4 

LCS-110328-5 

LCS-110328-6 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-7 

LCS-110328-8 

LCS-110328-9 

Average ±%RSD 

PFOS (lineal) 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

1.98 

1.98 

1.98 

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

2.11 

2.04 

2.09 

'ARecovery 

107 

103 

106 

105% ±2.0% 

9.94 

9.94 

9.94 

11.4 

11.7 

10.6 

115 

118 

107 

113% ±5.0% 

Lab ID 

LCS-110328-13 

LCS-110328-14 

LCS-110328-15 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-16 

LCS-110328-17 

LCS-110328-18 

Average ±%RSD 

PFOS (linear * branched) 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

2.00 

2.00 

2.00 

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

2.48 

2.28 

2.29 

'ARecovery 

124 

114 

115 

118% ±4.7% 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

11.5 

12.1 

11.2 

115 

121 

112 

116% ±4.0% 

NA= Not/Applicable 

Page 19 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 7 continued. Laboratory Control Spike Recovery. 

ETS-8-044.0 

Analyzed 4/1/11 

(ETSKirie) 

Lab ID 

LCS-110328-1 

LCS-110328-2 

LCS-110328-3 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-4 

LCS-110328-5 

LCS-110328-6 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-7 

LCS-110328-8 

LCS-110328-9 

Average ±%RSD 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.198 

0.198 

0.198 

PFOS (lineal) 

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.137 

0.157 

0.212 

'ARecovery 

69.2 

79.0 

107 

85.1% ± 23%'^ 

1.98 

1.98 

1.98 

2.11 

2.06 

2.05 

107 

104 

104 

105% ±1.6% 

9.94 

9.94 

9.94 

11.4 

11.2 

11.0 

115 

112 

111 

113% ±1.8% 

Lab ID 

LCS-110328-10 

LCS-110328-11 

LCS-110328-12 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-13 

LCS-110328-14 

LCS-110328-15 

Average ±%RSD 

LCS-110328-16 

LCS-110328-17 

LCS-110328-18 

Average ±%RSD 

PFOS (linear+branched) 

Spiked 

Concentration 

(ng/mU 

0.200 

0.200 

0.200 

Calculated 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.245 

0.233 

0.229 

'ARecovery 

123 

117 

114 

118% ±3.9% 

2.00 

2.00 

2.00 

2.74 

2.77 

2.63 

137 

138 

132 

136% ±2.4%''' 

10.0 

10.0 

10.0 

13.6 

13.1 

13.3 

136 

131 

133 

133%±1.9%''' 

(1) Percent recovery did not meet method acceptance criteria of ±20%. 

(2) RSD did not meet method acceptance criteira of ±20%. 

8.7 Analytical Method Uncertainty 

Analytical uncertainty is based on historical QC data that is control charted and used to evaluate 

method accuracy and precision. The method uncertainty is calculated following ETS-12-012.2. The 

standard deviation is calculated for the set of accuracy results (in %) obtained for the QC samples. The 

expanded uncertainty is calculated by multiplying the standard deviation by a fector of 2, which 

con-esponds to a confidence level of 95%. The most recent 50 data points were used to generate the 

method uncertainty values listed in Table 8. For samples analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiri<, the PFOS 

method uncertainty is expanded to ±36%. 

Table 8. Analytical Uncertainty. 

Analyte 

PFBS 

PFHS 

PFOS 

Standard Deviation 

7.57 

5.39 

11.7 

IVIethod 

Uncertainty 

±15% 

±11% 

±23% <^' 

(1) Samples analyzed for PFOS on 4/4/11 on ETS Kirte will have an expanded method uncertainty of ±36%. 

8.8 Field Matrix Spikes (FMS) 

Low (1.0 ng/mL) and high (10 ng/mL) field matrix spikes (FMS) were collected at each sampling point to 

verify that the analytical method is applicable to the collected matrix. Field matrix spikes were generated 

by adding a measured volume of fleld sample to a container spiked by the laboratory with PFBS (linear), 

PFHS (linear), and PFOS (linear) prior to shipping sample containers for sample collection. Field matrix 

spike recoveries within method acceptance criteria of 100 ± 30% confinn that "unknown" components in 

the sample matrix do not significantiy interfere with the extraction and analysis of the analytes of interest. 

Field matrix spike concentrations must be 50% of the sample concentration to be considered an 

appropriate field spike. Field matrix spikes are presented in section 9 of this report. 

Page 20 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

(Sample Concentration of FMS- Average Concentration; FieldSample & FieldSample Dup.) ^, „„„, 

FMS Recovery = -^ i-^* 100% 

Spike Concentraton 

8.9 Laboratory Matrix Spikes (LMS) 

The high FMS sample spike concentration (10.0 ng/mL) for DAL GW MFL MW04 was not appropriate 

as compared to the sample concentration for PFOS. The sample set was reanalyzed on 4/4/11 with a 

24.9 ng/mL laboratory matrix spike for PFOS. Laboratory matrix spike recoveries within method 

acceptance criteria of 100 ± 30% confinn that "unknown" components in the sample matrix do not 

significantly interfere with the extraction and analysis of the analytes of interest. See section 9 for a 

discussion of the PFOS results. 

! 9 Data Summary and Discussion 

The tables below summarize the sample results and field matrix spike recoveries for the sampling 

locations as well as the trip blank and rinseate blank. Results and average values are rounded to tiiree 

significant figures according to EPA rounding mles. Because of rounding, values may vary slightly firom 

those listed in the raw data. Field matrix spike recoveries meeting the method acceptance criteria of 

±30%, demonstrate that the method was appropriate for the given matrix and their respective 

quantitative ranges. 

DAL GW MFL MW05 - The low-level FMS did meet method acceptance criteria for PFHS with a 

recovery of 134%, while the high-level FMS met method acceptance criteria with a recovery of 107%. 

Since the low-level FMS was the more appropriate spike level as compared to the sample 

concentration, the analytical uncertainty has been adjusted for PFHS to ± 34%. 

Page 21 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; /Vmended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 9. DAL GW MFL MW01 0 110322 

3MUMSID 

GLP10-01-02-14-017 

GLP10-01-02-14-018 

GLP10-01-02-14-019 

GLP10^1-02-14-020 

Description 

DALGWMFLMW01 0110322 

DAL GW MFL MW01 DB 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW01 LS 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW01 HS 110322 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or 'ARSD 

PFBS"* 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

<0.0250 

1.04 

9.65 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

104 

96.5 

<0.0250 ng/mL 

PFHS"> 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

<0.0250 

1.03 

9.39 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

103 

93.9 

<0.0250 ng/mL 

PTOS® 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0300 

<0.0300 

0.966 

10.2 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

96.6 

102 

<0.0300 ng/mL 

"CrPFOS'^ 

'ARecovery 

99.1 

98.6 

91.7 

87.3 

94.2% ±6.0% 

NA = Not /^plicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for 1304-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

(3) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiri<. 

Table 10. DAL GW MFL MW01 DO 110322 

3MUMSID 

GLP10-01-02-14-013 

GLP10-01-02-14-014 

GLP1CW)1-02-14-015 

GLPiaOI-02-14-016 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW01D 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW01D DB 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW01D LS 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW01D HS 110322 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or 'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.193 

0.194 

1.11 

10.2 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

91.7 

100 

0.194 ng/mL ±0.S2'A 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.0561 

0.0505 

1.06 

10.7 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

101 

106 

0.0533 ng/mL ±11'A 

PFOSf^ 

Concentratior 

(ng/mL) 

0.380 

0.325 

1.30 

10.6 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

94.8 

102 

0.353 ng/mL t16'A 

"CrPFOS'^' 

'ARecovery 

93.0 

93.4 

100 

107 

98.3'A i6.6'A 

NA=Not/\pplicat)le 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiri<. 

(3) Samples reported for 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

Page 22 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 11. DAL GW MFL MW02 0 110322 

3M LIMS ID 

GLP10-O1-O2-14-021 

GLP10-01-02-14-022 

GLP10^1-02-14-023 

GLP10-01-02-14-024 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW02 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW02 DB 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW02 LS 110322 

DAL GW MFL MWD2 HS 110322 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or 'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.195 

0.192 

1.27 

10.2 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

108 

100 

0.194 ng/mL ±1.6'A 

PFHS"' 

Concerrtration 

(ng/mL) 

0.474 

0.460 

1.67 

10.8 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

120 

103 

0.497 ng/mL ±3.0% 

pros® 

Concentratfon 

(ng/mL) 

1.42 

1.42 

2.58 

11.6 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

116 

102 

1A2ng/mL±0.0'A 

''C4-PF0S'» 

'ARecovery 

108 

90.6 

96.3 

98.7 

98.4'A ±7.3'A 

NA = Not Applicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS and 1304-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

Table 12. DAL GW MFL MW02D0 110322 

3M LIMS ID 

GLPIO-01-02-14-025 

GLPIO-01-02-14-026 

GLP10-01-02-14-027 

GLPIO-01-02-14-028 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW02D 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW02D DB 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW02D LS 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW02D HS 110322 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or 'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.145 

0.139 

1.22 

9.94 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

108 

98.0 

0.142 ng/mL ±4.2'A 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.395 

0.452 

1.47 

9.72 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

105 

93.0 

0.424 ng/mL ±13'A 

PFOS<^ 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

1.10 

1.10 

2.20 

10.8 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

110 

97.0 

1.10 ng/mL tO.O'A 

^^CrPFOS^ 

'ARecovery 

99.2 

94.5 

91.0 

86.7 

92.S'A ±5.7'A 

NA = Not Applicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS and 1304-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

Page 23 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 13. DAL GW MFL MW03 0 110323 

3M LIMS ID 

GLP10-01-02-14-029 

GLP10^1-02-14-030 

GLPIO-01-02-14-031 

GLP10^1-02-14-032 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW03 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MWD3 DB 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW03 LS 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW03 HS 110323 

Average Concentiration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

<0.0250 

0.999 

10.9 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

99.9 

109 

<0.0250 ng/mL 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.0741 

0.0592 

1.06 

10.8 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

99.3 

107 

0.0667 ng/mL±2r/o^ 

PFOS<^ 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.194 

0.223 

1.28 

10.1 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

107 

98.9 

0.209 ng/mL±14'A 

'^CrPFOS^' 

'ARecovery 

106 

94.6 

102 

88.5 

97.8'A ±7.9'A 

NA = Not Applicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiric. 

(3) Samples reported for 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1 /11. 

(4) RPD did not meet acceptance criteria of 100 ± 20%. 

Table 14. DAL GW MFL MW03D0 110323 

3M LIMS ID 

GLPIO-01-02-14-033 

GLPIO-01-02-14-034 

GLPIO-01-02-14-035 

GLPIO-01-02-14-036 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW03D 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW03D DB 110323 

DAL GW MFL MWD3D LS 110323 

DAL GW MFL MWD3D HS 110323 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

<0.0250 

1.13 

10.3 

'/oRecovery 

NA 

NA 

113 

103 

<0.0250 ng/mL 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

<0.0250 

1.07 

9.20 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

107 

92.0 

<0.0250 ng/mL 

PFOS'^ 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0300 

<0.0300 

0.986 

9.97 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

98.6 

99.7 

<0.0300 ng/mL 

"CrPFOS'^' 

'ARecovery 

99.7 

80.4 

118 

99.2 

99.4'A ±16'A 

NA = Not/Applicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiric 

(3) Samples reported for 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

Page 24 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

/Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 15. DAL GW MFL MW04 0 110323 

3M LIMS ID 

GLPIO-01-02-14-037 

GLP10-01-02-14-038 

GLP10^1-02-14-039 

GLP10-01-02-14-040 

GLP10^1-02-14-037 LMS 

Average Concentn 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW04 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW04 DB 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW04 LS 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW04 HS 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW04; 24.9 ng/mL LMS 

itfon (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or 'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

1.61 

1.72 

2.37 

13.0 

NA 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

70.5 

113 

NA 

1.67 ng/mL ±6.6'A 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

13.7 

11.8 

14.8 

23.1 

NA 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NC 

104 

NA 

12.8 ng/mL ±1S'A 

pros® 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

22.8 

22.1 

NA<^> 

33.5 

53.9 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NA<^> 

NC 

126 

22.5 ng/mL ±3.1'A 

"CrPFOS"' 

'ARecovery 

90.6 

88.0 

NA<^> 

100 

92.6 

92.9'A ±5.8% 

NA = Not Applicable 

NC = Not Calculated; Endogenous sample concentration greater than 2x spike level. 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS McCoy 

(3) Samples reported for 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

(4) Sample was not analyzed since spiked concentration was not appropriate compared to sample PFOS concentration. 

Page 25 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 16. DAL GW MFL MW04D0 110323 

3M LIMS ID 

GLP1CM)1-02-14-041 

GLP1&O1-02-14-042 

GLP10-01-02-14-043 

GLP10-01-02-14-044 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW04D 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW04D DB 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW04D LS 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW04D HS 110323 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or 'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.179 

0.162 

1.13 

10.0 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

96.0 

98.3 

0.171 ng/mL ± 1VA 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL] 

0.347 

0.336 

1.37 

9.26 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

103 

89.2 

0.342 ng/mL ±3.2'A 

PFOS'^ 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.196 

0.171 

1.32 

10.3 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

114 

101 

0.184 ng/mL ±14'A 

"CrPFOS'^' 

'ARecovery 

96.3 

87.8 

93.0 

95.9 

93.3'A ±4.7% 

NA = Not Applicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiric. 

(3) Samples reported for 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1 /11. 

Table 17. DAL GW MFL MW05 0 110323 

3MUMSID 

GLP10-01-02-14-045 

GLP10-01-O2-14-O46 

GLP10-01-02-14-047 

GLP10-01-02-14-048 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW05 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL M\/W5 DB 110323 

DAL GW MFL MWD5 LS 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW05 HS 110323 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or 'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

1.04 

1.05 

1.79 

10.6 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

74.5 

95.6 

1.05 ng/mL ±1.0'A 

PFHS"' 

Concentiration 

(ng/mL) 

1.31 

1.38 

2.68 

12.0 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

134*^' 

107 

1.35ng/mL±5.rA^ 

PFOS'^ 

Concerrtration 

(ng/mL) 

2.18 

1.97 

2.91 

11.9 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NC 

98.3 

2.08 ng/mL ±10'A 

"CrPFOS<^ 

'ARecovery 

90.6 

103 

97.1 

111 

100'A ±8.6'A 

NA = Not Applicable 

NC = Not Calculated; Endogenous sample concentration greater than 2x spike level. 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS and 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

(3) Field matrix spike recovery did not meet method acceptance criteria of 100% ± 30%. 

(4) The analytical method uncertainty has been adjusted for PFHS based on the recovery of the most appropriate spike level to ± 34%. 

Page 26 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 18. DAL GW MFL MW05D 0 110323 

3MUMSID 

GLP10-01-02-14-049 

GLP10-01-02-14-050 

GLP10^1-02-14-051 

GLP10-01-02-14-052 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW05D 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW05D DB 110323 

DAL GW MFL MWD5D LS 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW05D HS 110323 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or 'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.0275 

0.0284 

1.14 

10.9 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

111 

109 

0.0280 ng/mL ±3.2'A 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.0329 

0.0317 

1.16 

9.61 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

113 

95.8 

0.0323 ng/mL ±3.rA 

PFOS'^ 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0300 

<0.0300 

0.982 

10.2 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

98.2 

102 

<0.0300 ng/mL 

"C4-PF0S<" 

'ARecovery 

93.7 

96.4 

97.2 

101 

97.2'A ±3.3'A 

NA= Not Applicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiric. 

(3) Samples reported for 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1 /11. 

Table 19. DAL GW MFL MW10 0 110322 

3M LIMS ID 

GLP10-01-02-14-004 

GLP10-01-02-14-005 

GLP10-01-02-14-006 

GLP10-01-02-14-007 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW10 0110322 

DAL GW MFL MW10 DB 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW10 LS 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW10 HS 110322 

Average Concentiration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD or 'ARSD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.0452 

0.0399 

1.13 

11.2 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

109 

112 

0.0426 ng/mL±12% 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.134 

0.108 

1.11 

10.0 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

98.9 

98.8 

0.121 ng/mL±21'A'*> 

PFOS^^ 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.259 

0.224 

1.29 

10.4 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

105 

102 

0.242 ng/mL ±14'A 

''C4-PF0S<" 

'ARecovery 

111 

98.0 

94.5 

93.5 

99.2'A ±8.1'A 

NA=Not/Vpplicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiric. 

(3) Samples reported for 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1 /11. 

(4) RPD did not meet acceptance criteria of 100 ± 20%. 

Page 27 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; /^mended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 20. DAL GW MFL MW10D0 110322 

3M LIMS ID 

GLP10^1-02-14-008 

GLP10^1-02-14-009 

GLP10-01-02-14-O10 

GLP10-01-02-14-011 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW10D 0 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW10D DB 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW10D LS 110322 

DAL GW MFL MW1 OD HS 110322 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

<0.0250 

0.958 

9.53 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

95.8 

95.3 

<0.0250 ng/mL 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

0.0259 

0.0302 

1.12 

10.5 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

109 

105 

0.0281 ng/mL ± IS'A 

PTOS«' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0300 

<0.0300 

0.999 

10.2 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

99.9 

102 

<0.0300 ng/mL 

"C4-PFOS'^' 

'ARecovery 

98.0 

99.2 

104 

97.4 

99.6% ±2.9% 

NA = Not/Applicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiric. 

(3) Samples reported for 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

Table 21. DAL GW MFL MW13 0 110323 

3M LIMS ID 

GLP10-01-02-14-053 

GLP10^1-02-14-054 

GLP10-01-02-14-055 

GLP10-01-02-14-056 

Description 

DAL GWMFL MW13 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW13 DB 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW13 LS 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW13 HS 110323 

Average Concentration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

4.04 

4.22 

5.64 

14.0 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NC 

98.7 

4.13 ng/mL ±4.4'A 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

1.23 

1.30 

2.36 

11.0 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NC 

97.4 

1.27 ng/mL ±5.5'A 

PFOS'^ 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

8.33 

8.23 

10.1 

17.8 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NC 

95.2 

8.28 ng/mL ±1.2'A 

"C4-PTOS® 

'ARecovery 

95.1 

99.4 

85.9 

92.8 

93.3'A ± 6.0% 

NA = Not/Applicable 

NC = Not Calculated; Endogenous sample concentration greater than 2x spike level. 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS and 1304-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

Page 28 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; /Amended Interim Report 14 

/Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 22. DAL GW MFL MW13D0 110323 

3M LIMS ID iiii iiii 

_1 _J _J _1 CD CD CD CD 

Description 

DAL GW MFL MW13D 0 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW13D DB 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW13D LS 110323 

DAL GW MFL MW13D HS 110323 

Average Concerrtration (ng/mL) ± 'ARPD 

PFBS"' 

Concentiration 

(ng/mL) 

5.47 

4.59 

6.56 

15.6 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NC 

106 

5.03 ng/mL ±17'A 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

1.49 

1.46 

2.65 

11.1 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

118 

96.3 

1.48n^mL±2.0'A 

PFOS'^ 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

8.76 

8.59 

10.3 

17.7 

'ARecovery 

NA 

NA 

NC 

90.3 

8.68 ng/mL ±2.0'A 

''CrPFOSf^ 

'ARecovery 

86.4 

80.3 

90.5 

88.3 

86.4% ±5.0'A 

NA = Not/Applicable 

NC = Not Calculated; Endogenous sample concentration greater than 2x spike level. 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS and 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

Table 23. Trip Blank 

3M LIMS ID 

GLP10-01-02-14-001 

GLP10-01-02-14-002 

GLP10-01-02-14-003 

Description 

DAL GW Trip 1 

DALGWTriplLS 

DAL GW Trip 1 HS 

PFBS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

1.08 

10.0 

'ARecovery 

NA 

108 

99.9 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

1.12 

9.90 

'ARecovery 

NA 

112 

99.0 

PFOS'^ 

Concerrtration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0300 

1.00 

9.85 

'ARecovery 

NA 

100 

98.5 

"C4-PF0S'" 

'ARecovery 

97.3 

94.9 

97.4 

NA = Not Applicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiric. 

(3) Samples reported for 1304-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

Page 29 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; /Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Table 24. Rinseate Blanks 

3M LIMS ID Description 

GLP1(H)1-02-14-012 DAL GW MFL MW01 RB 110322 

PFBS"' 

Concerrtration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

'ARecovery 

NA 

PFHS"' 

Concentration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0250 

'ARecovery 

NA 

PFOS<^ 

Concentiration 

(ng/mL) 

<0.0300 

'ARecovery 

NA 

"C4-PF0S<" 

'ARecovery 

108 

NA = Not/Applicable 

(1) Samples reported for PFBS and PFHS were analyzed on 3/28/11. 

(2) Samples reported for PFOS were analyzed on 4/4/11 on ETS Kiric. 

(3) Samples reported for 13C4-PFOS were analyzed on 4/1/11. 

Page 30 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

10 Conclusion 

Laboratory control spikes and field matrix spikes were used to detennine the analytical method 

accuracy and precision for PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS. Analysis was successfully completed following 

3M Environmental Laboratory method ETS-8-044.0 described herein. 

111 Data/Sample Retention 

All remaining samples and associated project data (hardcopy and electronic) will be archived according 

to 3M Environmental Laboratory standard operating procedures. 

12 Attachments 

Attachment A: Protocol Amendment 14 (General Project Outline) 

Attachment B: Representative Chromatograms and Calibration Curves 

Attachment C: Analytical Method 

Attachment D: Methcxi Deviation 

Attachment E: Final Study Report Amendment 

Page 31 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

13 Signatures 

Cleston Lange, Ph.D., 3M Principal Analytical Investigator Date 

William KTlReagen, Ph.D., 3M Environmental Laboratory Department Manager Date 

<2( 

Date 

ahzhi 

Jaisimha Kesan, study Direcrtor D&te 

Page 32 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

ATTACHMENT A: PROTOCOL AMENDMENT 

Page 33 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

/Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Analytical Protocol: GLP10-01-02 

Amendment 14 

Study Title 

Analysis of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHS) and 

Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) in Groundwater, Soil and Sediment for the 3M 

Decatur Phase 3 Site-Related Monitoring Program 

PROTOCOL AMENDMENT NO. 14 

Amendment Date: 

November 29, 2010 

Performing Laboratory 

3M Environmental, Health, and Safety Operations 

3M Environmental Laboratory 

Building 260-5N-17 

Maplewood, MN 55144-1000 

Laboratory Project Identification 

GLP10-01-02-14 

Sampling Event 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - Groundwater Sampling 

Page 1 of 6 

Page 34 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

/Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farni Landflll - MArch 2011 

Analytical Protocol: GLP10-01-02 

Amendment 14 

This amendment modifies the following portion of protocol: 

"Analysis of PFOS, PFHS and PFBS in Groundwater, Soil and Sediment for the 3M 

Decatur Phase 3 Site-Related Monitoring Program" 

PROTOCOL READS: 

No changes to the wording of the protocol are required. 

AMEND rOREAO: 

No changes to the wording of the protocol are required. This amendment only addresses and documents 

the addition of the General Project Outiine (GPO) for the collection and analysis of groundwater samples 

from Decatur, AL, and conducted as part of the 3M Decatur Phase 3 Program for PFOS, PFHS and PFBS 

(GLP10-01-02). The sampling schedule and final designation of wells to be sampled are contingent upon 

completing an access agreement with BFI Morris Farm Landfill. The groundwater samples for this 

sampling event will be entered into the 3M Environmental Laboratory LIMS as project GLP10-01-02-14 

and reported as interim report GLP10-01-02-14. (reflecting study GLP10-01-02 and amendment -14). 

Reason: 

The reason for this amendment is to document the General Project Outiine (GPO) which describes the 

anticipate groundwater sample collection event to be conducted for the 3M Decatur, AL facility. 

The GPO is three pages in lengtii and included as attached to this amendment form. 

Page 2 of 6 

Page 35 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

/Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Analytical Protocol: GLP10-01-02 

Amendment 14 

Amendment Approval 

jlaijyj p/i^/i^ni 

12. 

y/. 

Gary Hohenstein, Sponsor Representative Date 

/ / 'klkt/o 

Cleston C. Lange, Principal Analytical Investigator Date 

///t!^$'/^/' 0 

William Reagen. EHS Opns Environmental Lab Management Date 

Jaisimha Kesari P.E., DEE, Study Director 

Page 3 of 6 

Page 36 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

Analytical Protocol: GLP10-01-02 

Amendment 14 

Environmental Health & Safety Operations, Environmental Laboratory 

Gsrssrai Project Outline 

Date: 

Subject: 

Gary Hohenstein, 3M EHS&Opns 

Susan Wolf, 3M EHS&Opns; Environmental Lab 

William Reagen. 3M EHS&Opns; Environmental Lab 

Cliffton Jacoby, 3M EHS&Opns; Environmental Lab 

Jai Kesari, Weston Solutions 

Charies Young, Weston Solutions 

Tim Frinak, Weston Solutions 

November 29,2010 

Analysis of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHS) and 

Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) in Groundwater, Soil and Sediment for the 3M Decatur 

Phase 3 Site-Related Monitoring Program; GLP Interim Report 14 - BFI Morris Farm Landfill 

Groundwater 

1 General Project Information 

Contacts 

Lab Request Numtier 

Six Digit Departanent Number 

Project Schedule/Test Dates 

3M Sponsor Repiesentatlve 

Gary Hohenstein 

3M EHS Operations 

3M Building 224-5W-03 

Saint Paul, MN 55144-1000 

Phone: (651)737-3570 

aahohensteinammm.com 

3M Environmental Laboratory Management 

William K. Reagen 

3M EHS Opns, Environmental Laboratory 

260-5N.17 

651 733-9739 

wkreaQen{@mmm.com 

Principal Anatyticar Investigator 

Cleston Lange 

3M EHS Opns. Environmental Laboratory 

260-5N-17 

651 733-9860 

ccJanc(?^mmm.(^m 

Sampling Coordinator 

Timothy Frinak 

Weston Solutions 

Timothy.frinak@westonsolutions.com 

Phone: (334)-332-9123 

GLP10411^2-14 

Dept #530711, Project #0022674449 

To de determined 

Ail verbal and written conespondence will be directed to Gary Hohenstein. 

Pf§b^eM1 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

Analytical Protocol: GLP10-01-02 

Amendment 14 

2 Background Information and Project Objectlve(s) 

The 3M EHS Operations Laboratory (3M Environmental Lab) will receive and analyze groundwater 

samples collected from monitoring wells actively maintained at the BFI Morris Farm Landfill. Each 

monitoring station at the facility is constructed witti two wells, one monitoring the residuum / epikarst 

groundwater zone and one monitoring the bedrock groundwater zone. Based on review of the well 

locations and groundwater flow patterns for the site, the following wells have been selected for sampling 

and the rationale is provided for each selected location: 

Well location MW-10 - This well location is upgradient of the active areas of tiie landfill. It is located in 

the nortiiwest corner of the property. The location serves as an upgradient groundwater monitoring point 

for the site. 

Well location MW-07 - In a 1996 hydrogeologic investigation, this well location, constructed southwest of 

the active portions of the landfill, indicated upgradient conditions with possible seasonal impact from 

active areas at the landfill. Later reports indicate the location was subsequently abandoned. As a result, 

the adjacent well location, MW-05, has been selected to provide similar coverage for the area. 

Well locations MW-1,2, 3, 4, and 13 - These well locations are located along the east and south 

boundaries of the active landfill area and serve as downgradient monitoring points for the site. Review of 

recent groundwater monitoring reports have Indicated sporadic elevated metals concentrations 

associated with well locations, MW-01, MW-02, MW-04, and MW-13, suggesting potential impact from 

site activities. As a result, these locations are proposed for monitoring downgradient groundwater 

conditions. Since MW-03 closes a potential data gap on the downgradient side of the landfill, this location 

has also been included in the sampling effort. 

Sampling locations will be analyzed for of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate 

(PFHS) and Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) as part of the BFI Morris Fann Landfill groundwater 

sampling. Analyses will be conducted under tiie GLP requirements of EPA TSCA Good Laboratory 

Practice Standards 40 CFR 792. 

Groundwater samples from Decatur, AL will be collected by Weston Solutions personnel as soon as 

access is granted. The 3M Environmental Laboratory will prepare the sample bottles with all required 

spikes to ensure that results for PFBS. PFHS, and PFOS are of a known precision and accuracy. The final 

report will be submitted to Gary Hohenstein and Jai Kesari upon completion under interim report GLP10-

01-02-13. 

3 Project Schedule 

Sample collection bottles will be prepared by the 3M Environmental Laboratory. Sample bottles will be shipped 

in coolers overnight to 3M Decatur for anival on Tuesday. November 30,2010. Sample bottles should be 

stored refrigerated on-site until sample collection. 

Martin Smith \ Weston Trailer 

3M Decatur Plant 

1400 State Docks Road 

Decatur, Alabama 35601 

4 Test Parameters 

The targeted limit of quantitation will be 0.025 ng/mL (ppb) for PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS. 

A totel of fourteen sampling locations have been specified. For each sampling location, a total of four sample 

bottles will be collected (sample, sample duplicate, low-level field matrix spike, and high-level fiekJ matiix spike). 

^me^B°!i% 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundw/ater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Analytical Protocol: GLP10-01-02 

Amendment 14 

The "fill to here" line on each 250 mL Nalgene bottle will be 200 mL. One set of trip blanks consisting of 

reagent-grade water, a low-level trip blank spike, and a high-level trip blank spike will be prepared at tiie 3M 

Enwronmental Laboratory and sent to the sampling location witti flie other bottles. The low field matrix spike 

will be prepared at 1 ng/mL and ttie high field matrix spike at 10 ng/mL. One additional bottle will be prepared 

to be used for ttie preparation of ttie equipment rinseate blank. In addition to ttie sample bottles, a 1-L 

container of Milli Q water will be included to be used for ttie preparation of the rinseate blank. 

All sample bottles will include ttie addition of ^^Oz-PFBS, ''^Cs-PFHS, and ^^CrPFOS, (intemal standards) at a 

nominal concentration of 1 ng/mL. All sample bottles will also include tfie addition of C4-PFOS (surrogate 

spike) at a nominal concentration of 0.1 ng/mL. A totel of 60 sample bottles will be prepared. 

5 Test Methods 

Samples will be prepared and analyzed by LC/MS/MS folbwing ETS-8-044.0 "Detennination of Perfluorinated 

Compounds In Water by High Perftarmance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometiy Direct Injection 

Analysis". Altemately, samples may be analyzed by ETS 8-154.3 "Determination of Perfluorinated Acids, 

Alcohols, Amides, and Sulfonates In Water By Solid Phase Extraction and High Perfonnance Liquid 

Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry". 

Where applicable, samples will be analyzed against an intemal stendard calibration curve. Each cun/e point will 

contain isotopically-labeled PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS at a nominal concentration of 1 ng/mL. The calibration 

curve will be generated by teking ttie ratio of the standard peak area counts over the intemal stendard peak 

area counts to fit ttie date for each analyte. 

Laboratory contixil samples prepared witti ttie samples must have an average recovery wittiin 100±20% and a 

RSD ^0% . The date quality objective for Uiis study is quantitetive resulte for the target analytes with an 

analytical accuracy of 100±30%. Field matiix spikes not yielding recoveries wittiin 100±30% will be addressed 

in ttie report and ttie final accuracy stetement may be adjusted acconjingly. 

6 Reporting Requirements ^^^ ^ 

For each sampling location, ttie report will contain ttie results for ttie sample, sample duplicate, and ttie two field 

matiix spikes. Trip blank and tiip blank spikes will be reported for ttie sampling event as will any 

equipment/rinseate blanks prepared in ttie field. Laboratory continol spikes of reagent water prepared at ttie time 

of sample exttaction will also be reported and used to evaluate tiie overall mettiod accuracy and precision. 

Mettiod blanks of reagent water prepared at ttie time of sample exttaction will be used to determine ttie method 

detection limit For ttiose sampling locations where the field matiix spike level was not appropriate, due to 

higher ttian expected analyte concentrations, a laboratory mattix spike may ba prepared and will be included in 

ttie final report 

^mtiM 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

ATTACHMENT B: REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE CHROMATOGRAMS AND 

CALIBRATION CURVE 

Page 40 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS. PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

Ginger AG01330509. Results Name: gll0328a.rdb 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:51:45 PM 

Printing Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011 

Page 1 of 1 

Page 41 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundv\^ater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

*** Ginger AG01330509 Results Name: gll0328a.rdb 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:52:04 PM 

Printing Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011 

Page 1 of 1 

Page 42 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS. and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Ginger AG01330509 Results Name: gll0328a.rdb 

I

SanviaMan»:-g11O32tta0ir SmrvtolO:*10007-32-r Fl»:-9l10328a.wirr 

PaA Nma: Tfas * Uau<M): *299.CV99.0 aniu.299.0/30J> - ' 

Cixnnwnt-U ngftnL FC std In Synth. WatM' Anrwtation: 

Sacapla Inde;(: 17 

Sanpla Typ«; SCandatd 

I

S«ni()i» Mains: *g1103280028' Sampto ID:'11002^0- Fh:'gniX}2Sft.wir 

pMkNaRM:TFBS- Man(M):*299.af99.0amu,299.0rea0amuCommant IMhod btarir Amouaon:** 

Saaple Index: 28 

Sample Typo: Onknomn 

Conc ng/n 

Calculated Gone : 1.02 ng/nL 

Acq. Date: 3/28/2011 

*cq. Tlnia: 4:3<:01 PH 

Proc. Iilgoiithn: IntelliQuan -

Min. Peak Height: 0.00 cpa 

Hln. Paak Width : 0.00 sec 

Smooching Width : 0 poin 

RT Window: 30.0 eec 

Ezpected RT ; 11.2 min 

Uaa Relative RT: (Jo 

Int. Typa: Valley 

Retention Time : 11.3 mi n 

Height: l.HletOOS cps 

Start Tine : 11.2 Bin 

E nd Time: 11.S nt n 

IQA 

1^ 

1.7a5 

IXaS1.6*5' 

1.4*5-

1.3*5' 

1.2*5-

1.1*5 

1.0*5-

9JM8.0*4-

7.0*4-

6.0M 

5.0M 

4.0*4 

3.0a4 

2.0*4 

I.OMJ 

I

Sam(teNwnB:-g110a2aa035- SamrlalD:'l.CS-11D325-4' Fla:'g11032aa.wi<r 

Paak Nama: TFBS* Mau<e«):-299.a«9.0 Bmu.299.omo.D amu* 

Commant: "appb LCS* Annotation:" 

Sample Index: 

Concentration! 

Calculated Conc : 

Acq. D»te: 

Acq. Tine ; 

Hodified: 

Proc. Algorithm: 

Hin. Peak Height 

Hln. Peak Width: 

Smoothing Width: 

Expected RT : 

U ae Relative RT : 

int. Typa: 

Area: 

Height: i 

start Time : 

End Tine : 

N/A 

3/28/201 

7:52:09 

Mo 

IntelliQi 

0.00 

0.00 

0 

H.J 

Ho 

M 

Bin 

min 

2799 counts 

.J2ot002 

11.S Bin 

I Samf4aNama:-g11032BaD46' San¥lalD:TCS-11032S-r Fla:'g11032ea.w«r 

Peak Name: "PFBS- Mw»<e*): •299X/99J) w 

• Comment'lOppb LCS' Annotation:' 

Sample Type; QC 

Calculated 

fled; 

Expected RT: 

Relativ e RT: 

Modified 1 

RT Hlndow: 

Expected R T 

Int. Type : 

Height; 

Start Time: 

End Time : 

RT-. 

Yes 

30.0 

«l* 

Manual 

6S70759 CO 

.SSetOOS 

11.3 

11.7 

min 

cps 

Bin 

mln 

1.4rt 

1J*6 

Ua6 

1.1*6 

T*^-" * 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 3:00:41 PM 

Printing Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011 

Page 1 of 6 

Page 43 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS. PFHS. and PFOS In Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Ginger AG01330509 Results Name: gll0328a.rdb 

I

Sampl*NanM:-g110328aOS5' S«mplaD:-QLP1(M)1<0M4«17- FlK-g1l0328a.«rir 

P*akNam*:TFBS- HaH<a»):'299.0199.0 amu.299.0/80.0 amu* 

ComiMnt-DALGWHFLI>IVV010110327 Anutation:'* 

Sanple Index; »b 

Sample Type: Dnknoun 

Concentration; N/A 

Calculated Ccnc: 0.00507 i 

Acq, Date: 3/29/2011 

Acq. Time: 12:54:21 PH 

Hodified: 

Proc. Algorithm: ] 

Hin. Peak Height: 

Hin. Peak width: 

Smoothing Width; 

RT Window: 

I

Sample Name: -g11032Sa090- Sampto 10: 'GLP1(M)1-02-14-021' FHa: -g11032Sa.wir 

Paak Name: TFBS- Mau(as): *a99.0/99J} amu.299.(V80.0 ' 

Comment-DAL GW MFL UW02 0110322* AnnotBlk)n:~ 

Sample Index; 90 

Sample Typa; Unknown 

Concentration: H/A 

Calculated Conc: 0.195 n 

Acq. Oate: 3/29/2011 

Acq. Time: 2;2»:31 PH 

2.8M' Ho 

illiQuao - lOA 

> Relal • RT: 

2300 

2200 

2100 

2000 

1900 

1800 

1700 

1G00 

1500 

1400 

1300 

1200 

1100 

1000 

900 

800 

700 

600 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

k 1 111 i m 

.. i M ^ 

u.Mwhi^^^i^d.fi^XfMW^H'^ , 

I

SanvlaNam*:*g11032aa104' Sample 10:'OLP1(M>1.02-14-029' Fle:'g11032Ba.wiT 

Peak Name:-PFBS* Ma*a(et):'299.Q/9gj} 8niu.2g9.0re0.0 vraT 

ConvnenC1)Al.GWMFLMW030110323* Anootstion:*-

Sample Index: 104 

3000' 

2S00' 

2600' 

2400' 

2200-

2000-

Modified: Vea 

Proc. Algorithm: IntelliQua n -

Holae Percentage : 50 

Base. Sub. window: l.OO n. 

Paak-Split. Factor; 3 

Report Largest Peak: No 

Smoothing Width: 0 

Expected RT: 11.3 Bin 

Ose Relativ e RT: Ho 

Int . Type: Baae To Base 

Area; 1215<5 counts 

Height: 3.13e»004 cps 

HQII 

poin s 

ft 

if 

" • " 

2.6*4 

X 4 t 

2.2*4 

2.0M 

1.B«4 

S«fnpl«Name:'g110328a118- Sample ID: "GLPICMll-Oa. 

Peak Name: *PFBS^ Msis(«i):'209.0/99.0 amu.299JVBaO 

Comment-DAL GW MFL UVVM011032r AonotaSon:" 

Sample Index; IIB 

Sample Type: Saiople Type: Unknown 

Concentration: 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. lioe : 

Hodified: 

Proc- Algoritha : 

Min. Peak Height 

Min. Peak Width: 

Smoothing Width: 

Unknown 

N/A 

0.013* 

3/29/201 

6;*1;55 

Ho 

Intelli Q 

0.00 

O.OO 

0 

«1 

illlQuan - IQA 

Hin. Paak width: 

Smoothing Width: 

Expected RT: 

Use RBlatlva RT: 

2.31e+005 eps 

4«Jp.Mi*..M^ft., iojUi^l^M.^ft^^iJlW.1.1 ..A^jid^fA^ikJm 

9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 1Z6 13.0 11J] 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 3:00:41 PM 

Printing Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011 

Page 2 of 6 

Page 44 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

*** Ginger AG01330509 Results Name: gll0328a.rdb 

I

S«m(ieName:-g110328a13r Saffl(4elD:>6LP1(M>1-02-14-04S' Fle:*Bl10328a!<!ir 

PMh Nanta: TFBS* MaM(*s): *299.0/99.0 aRW,299.0ffl'' 

Cortmant*DALGWMFLMWD5011032r Annotation: 

Sample Index: 132 

Sanple Typ< 

N/A 

Calculated Conc: 1 04 ng 

Acq. Date: 3/30/2011 

Acq. Time: 3:07 

Modified: Y 

12 AM 

ea 

Proc. Algorithm: IntelliQuan -

Holse Percentage: 

Base. Sub. Window: 

Psok-Split. Factor: 

Report Largest Peak; 

Min. Peak Height: 

Min. Peak Width: 

Smoothing Width; 

Expected RT: 1 

Uae Relative RT: H 

int. Type: Base 

Retention Time: 1 

Area: 5571B4 

Height: l.SOe 

1.00 n 

2 

0.00 

0 

.2 min 

To Base 

.3 min 

005 cps 

I

SamplaNama:'Bl1032Sa06r SMn|)teCi:*CLPIt>O1-02-14-0M' Fla:'g110328a.wl)r 

PwAN8ma;'PfaS' Mau(as): *299.0/99.0 aniu299IV80J] amu* 

CommanfOALGWMFLMW100110322' " - -

llOuan - IQA 

Sample Index 

Concentratio 

Calculated C 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time: 

Hodified: 

Proc. Algorithm: 

Hin. Peak Height 

Mln. Peak wl 

Smoothing Wl 

Expected RT; 

U«e Ralative 

Int. Typa: 

rh: 

KT; 

Area: 

Height: 

End Tine: 

£2 

Unknown 

H/A 

0.0<S2 

3/29/20 

6:04:21 

Ho 

Intelll 

0.00 

0.00 

30.0 

Ho 

Valley 

588T 

.A4e*00 

11.5 

§- 3SO0 

I

Sampl»Name:*g11032Sa0ir Sample 10:'lOOO/.^'^' Fle:'g11032ea.wW 

Peak Name: •PFHS' K4a3s(es): •399.IV99.0 amu,399.IV80.0 amu" 

Comment '1.0 ng/mL FC Ud In Synlh. Water* ArewWiDn:" 

Sample Index: 17 

I

SamplaNama:-Bl1032ea146- SamFialD:''dLPia«1-02-14-053' Ft*:'g110328a!:<Sr 

Peak Name: T>FB5' M3sa(e*):'299.0.«9.0amu.299.0/B0.0amu* 

Comment "DAL GWMFL MW13 0 110323" 

Sanple Index: 146 

Sample Type: Unknown 

Concentration: N/A 

Calculated Conc; 4.04 

Acq. Tlmo: 7:19:52 

Modified: Ho 

Proc. Algorithm: IntelliQ 

Mln. Peak width: 0.00 

Smoothing Width: 0 

expected RT: 11.2 

Uae Relative RT: No 

Int. Type: Valley 

Height: S.SSe-fOOS 

End Time: 11.7 

ng/mL 

W 

polnta 

cpa 

min 

i 

1 

S.0a5 

4.8*5 

4.6*5 

4.0*5 

3Je5 

3.6*5 

3 M S 

2J)*5 

2.6*5 

2^e5 

2.3eS 

2.0*5 

8.0*4' 

6.0*4' 

4.0*4-

2.0*4' 

0.0' 

Concentration: 1.00 ng/nL 

Calculated Conc; 1.05 ng/mL 

Acq. Date: 3/23/2011 

Acq. Time; 4;34:01 PM 

Modified: Ho 

Proc. AlgorithB; IntelliQuan - IQA 

Hin. Peak Height: 0.00 cps 

Hln. Peak Width: 0.00 sec 

Smoothing Width: 0 points 

Expected RT: 12.3 min 

Retantlon Time: 

Area: 1 

Height: 

End Time: 

11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13JJ 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 3:00:42 PM 

Printing Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011 

Page 3 of 6 

Page 45 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Ginger AG01330509 Results Name: gll0328a.rdb 

I

SamplBNima:'g11032aa02r Sample ID: *11002'^0' F4a:'g11oi28a.wHr 

Peah Nana: "TifHS* Mas^*t):'399JV99.0amu,399.0re0J)amu' 

Comment: "Malhod bbnk* Annotatian:-

Sanple Index: 20 

Sample Type; Unknown 

Concentration: B/A 

Sample Nam*:'g110328*035' S«rvlaio:XCS-1li32S-4' FI*:'g1ia32aa.wHr 

Peak Name: •PFHS' UB**(*«):'399JV99 J) anu.399JV8a.O MM * 

Commant'2ppbLCS' Annotation:-

Calculated Conc 

Acq. Date 

Acq. Tina 

Modified: 

Proc. Alq 

Hln. Peak 

Smoothing 

rithn 

Beigh 

Width 

Width 

Uae Belat 

Int. Type 

Area"^"" 

Height: 

Start TlB 

End Time: 

ve RT 

Tine; 

0.00264 ng 

7:52:09 PM 

Ko 

IntelliQuan -

0.00 sec 

12.3 min 

Ho 

Base To Base 

12.4 min 

13259 counts 

2.4Be't003 cps 

12.7 min 

Sam(<*Name:*a11032Ba04ff- Sam(«*IO:*l.CS-11032S-r Fie:-g1 i032aa.Mtfr 

PMkName:T>FHS* MaM(e«):'399iV99.0afflu,399.0raO.O-- ' 

Commant: *10tipb LCS* Annotation:-

Sample Index; 46 

Sample Type: QC 

Sample Typa: QC 

Concentration: 1.9B 

Calculated Conc: 2.13 

Acq. Date: 3/28/2011 

Acq. Timer 9:58:08 PK 

Modified: Ho 

Proc. Algorithm: IntelllQua r 

Min. Peak Height: 0.00 c 

Area: 

Height: 

Start Time: 

End Time; 

2951693 c 

s.ieetoos 

12.2 

12.6 

10.0 10.5 11.0 

Sample Name: 'g110328a0a5- San^ta ID: -GLP1(M>1-02-14-01 r Fla: 'g11032Sa.wlir 

Peak Name: TFHS* Ma*a{e*):*390.a99.08mu,390.(V80.0 8n«u' 

Comment*OALGWMFLMW010110322' AnrK>taIion:~ 

Sample Index: BS 

Sanple Type: Unknown 

Concentration: Concentration: H/A 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Tine: 

Hodified: 

Proc. Algorlthn; 

Min. Peak Width; 

Saoothlng width: 

RT Window: 

Expected RT: 

use Relative BT: 

Int. Type: 

Area: 13. 

Height: 

Start Tine: 

End Tine: 

9.94 

10.3 

3/29/201 

1:16:17 

DL 

ng/iBL 

kM 

IntelliQuan -

0.00 

0 

30.0 

NO 

Valley 

.lOe-fOOe 

12.3 

12.B 

poin 

nin 

cpa 

Bin 

Bin 

IQA 

f 

1 

2Ja« 

2.2e6 

2JM 

1.6*6 

1^4*6 

1.2a6 

1.0ae 

B.0*S 

6.0BS 

4.0*5 

2.0*5 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time: 

Proc. Algo 

Hln. Peak 

tone. 

ithm: 

eight 

idth; 

Area: 

Height: 

3/29/201 

12:59:21 

IntelliQ 

0.00 

0 

30.0 

12.3 

Valley 

73B5 CO 

.53e«003 

PM 

mln 

mln 

IQA 

S 

# 

1500 

130(' 

110(-

1000 

90(' 

BOO 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 3:00:42 PM 

Printing Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011 

Page 4 of 6 

Page 46 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

Ginge r AG01330509 Results Name: gll0328a.rd b 

I

Samp4e Name:'i 

Peak Name:-PF 

Commant *DAL I

Saftv(eName:'g1l032aa104- Sampla 10:'GLP1{M)1-02-14-029' Fle:'g1l0328a.wir 

Peak Name: "PFHS* Masa(*a): *399JV99J> amu,399.<V80i) amu* 

Commant'DAL GW MFL UW03011032r AmXalion:-

anple Index; 104 

2.5*4 

2v«M 

2Je4-

2.2e4-

2.1B4-

2.0*4-

i:'gU0328a090' Sanpla K):-GLP KM 1-02-14-021' 

"PFHST MM>(a>):*399.omj)amu,399.(V80.0a(nu' 

*DALGW MFL MW02 0110322* " ' •• -

Sample ladax; 90 

Sample Type: 

N/A 

Acq. Time: 

Modified; 

Proc. Algor thn: 

Holse Percentage: 

Baae. Sub. 

Peak-Split. 

Hin. Peak B 

Hin. Peak li 

Snoothing k 

BT Window: 

Expected RT 

lindoH 

/29, 

:29: 

74 

2011 

31 PH 

Yes 

nte] 

at Paak: 

:lght: 

dth: 

e RTj 

12 

No 

Baaa 

Retention Tine: 

Height: 

Start Time: 

End Tine: 

63 

1? 

959 

e€t* 

1? 

12 

IQuan 

0.00 

0 

a 

ro Bas 

4 n 

•05 c 

2 n 

7 D 

I

Sam(teName:'g11032aa11ff' SamptalD:'-Gl>1(H)1-02-14-03r Flle:'g110328a.wW 

Peak Name: *PFHS* Mnafat): "399.0/99.0 «mu,399.(V80J> amu* 

Ccmnienl:*DALGWMFLMW04 011032r Annotabon:-

Sample Index: IIB 

Sanple Type: Unknown 

Concentration: 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time: 

Hodified: 

Proc. Algorlthn: 

Holse Percentage 

Base. Sub. Windc 

Peak-Split. Fact 

Report Largest p 

Hin. Peak Belght 

Hin. Peak Width: 

Snoothing Width: 

Expected RT: 

Int. Type: 

Start Tine: 

Unknown 

H/A 

0.074] 

3/29/2011 

6;4l:55 P 

Yes 

IntelllQu 

r: 1.00 

0.0 

0 

30.0 

Ho 

Base To B 

12.4 

13792 CO 

;.56e»004 

12.2 

1JM' 

iJBo4-

1.7*4-

i- 1.3*4-

1.2*4-

1.1*4 

1.0wl 

9000.0-

BO0O.0-

7000.0' 

6000.0 

S00O.D 

4000.0-

3000.0' 

2000.0' 1 ^•OtO^C^^AL^ 

I

Samp4eName:-g1l0328a13r Sample ID: •GLP1(M>1-02-14-045- Fila:-011032Ba.v<(r 

Peak Name: *PPHS* Maaa(e*): *399.0/99J) amu,399.0WI.O 

Comment'DALGWMFLMW05011032r • - -

Sample Index: 132 

Calculated Conc: 13.7 ng/>L 

Acq. Date: 3/29/2011 

Acq. Time: 10:54:50 PH 

Proc. Algoritha: IntelliQuan -

Noise Percentage: 50 

Base. Sub. Hlndow: 1.00 n 

Peak-Split. Factor; 2 

Mln. Peak Height; 0.00 

Mln. Peak Width: 0.00 

Smoothing Width; 0 

RT Window: 30.0 aec 

Expected RT: 12.3 mln 

Use Relative RT: No 

Int. Type: Baae To Base 

Retention Tine; 12.4 nlr 

Area: 15277826 coun 

Height; 3.0Be'.006 cpa 

Start Time: 12.2 mil 

End Tine; 13.2 mln 

MQII 

In 

points 

S 

# 

i 

3J)*6 

2.8*8 

2.6*8 

2.0e6 

1.8*6 

1.4*6 

4.0*5-

2.0*5-

Concentration: H/A 

Acq. Date: 3/30/2011 

Acq. Tine; 3;07:12 AH 

Hodified: Yea 

Proc. Algorithm IntelliQuan -

Hoise Percentage: 70 

Base. Sub. Hlndow; 1.00 c 

Peak-Split. Factor; 2 

Report Largest Peak: Ho 

Hln. Peak Height: 0.00 

Hin. Peak Hldth: 0.00 

Snoothing width: 0 

Expected RT: 12.3 nlr 

Use Relative RT; No 

Retention Tine: 12.4 nin 

Area; 172757B counti 

Height: 4.32e»005 eps 

End Tine: 12.9 min 

MQII 

:P8 

poin 

S 

pf 

1 

4.2a5 

4.0a5 

3.8*5 

3.6*5 

3.4*5 

3.2*5 

2.8*5 

2>*5 

2Je5 

2.0*5 

1.8*5 

1.6*5 

1.4*5 

1.2*5 

1.0*5 

8.0*4 

6.0M 

4.0*4 

2.0*4 

12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 

Data printe d by STW 

Printin g Time: 3:00:4 2 PM 

Printin g Date : Thursday , March 31 , 2011 

Page 5 of 6 

Page 47 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS. PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Ginger AG01330509 Results Name: gll0328a.rdb 

I

S«mpl*NanM:-g110328*062- Sampl*b:'GLPlMl1-02-14-0a4- Fle:'g1l0328B.<irir~ 

P*« Nam*: •PFHS- Mau(*«):*399.0/99.0afflu,399.(VSOJ)Miiu' 

Commant:*DALGWUFLMW100110322* Amotalion:^ 

sample Index: £2 

Sample Type: Unknown 

I

Sampl«Name:'glli328a14S' SanvtalO:'GLPI041-0Z-14-053- FHa:-g1ia32Sa.wHr 

pM*NBme:-pniS' Mass(**): "asgjysgJ) amu,399JVS0.0 amu* 

ComnMnt'DALGWMFLMW13011032r Annotslion:-

Acq. Date: 3/29/2011 

Acq. Time: 6:04:21 AM 

Proc. Algorlthn; IntelliQuan - HQII 

Hois* Percentage: BO 

Base. Sub. Hlndow: 1.00 nin 

Paak-Split. Factor: 3 

Min. Peak Height: 0.00 cps 

Hin. Peak Width: 0.00 sec 

Snoothing width: 0 point 

Expected RT; 12.3 mln 

Int. Type; Base To Base 

Retention Tine: 12.3 nin 

Area: 159923 counts' 

Height: 3,33e«004 cps 

End Tine: 11.6 Bin 

S 

i 

3.2*4 

3.0*4 

2.8*4 

2.6*4 

2.284 

2.0M 

1.0e4 

4000.0-

2000.0-

Concentration: 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Tims: 

Hodified; 

Proc. Algorithm: 

Hin. Peak Height 

Hln. Peak Width: 

Smoothing Mldth; 

RT Window: 

Uae Relative RT: 

Int. Type: 

Retention Time: 

Height: 

1.23 

3/30/201 

7:19;52 f 

No 

IntelliQ 

0.00 

30.0 

12.3 

»o 

valley 

12.4 

5553 cc 

.39e.005 

Start Tine: 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 3:00:42 PM 

Printing Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011 

Page 6 of 6 

Page 48 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Famn Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0401a.rdb 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 3:44:53 PM 

Page 1 of 1 

Page 49 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fami Landfill - M/\rch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0401a.rdb 

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 

Analyte Conc. / IS Conc. 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:34:06 PM 

Page 1 of 1 

Page 50 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS. and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCcy Results Name: mcll0401a.rdb 

I

Sampi»Namw-mc1lO401aO2O- ^mplBID:-10007-32^' fiT'mei k 

pB«kNama:*13C4PFOS.Sun' htau(M}:'503.00(V80JMO Da' 

Conmsnt *2^ noAnL FC Ud In Synth. Water* Annolatkin: ** 

2£m4-

2Aa4 

2J*4 

2.2*4 

2.1*4 

ample Type; 

alculate d Conc 

Standard 

2.40 

ng/mL 

ng/BL 

Peak-Split . 

Report I^cg 

Min. Peak H 

Facto 

a t Pe 

ight : 

dth : 

Smoothing width: 

Expected BT 

Uae fielativ 

Int . Type: 

Retention T 

Area: 

Height: 

star t Time: 

End Time: 

R T : 

m e ; 

9 

Baae To Baae 

2.5S«*00f eps 

1.1*4-

l.(to4' 

WOOJ)-

80WJ)-

7000,0-

6000.0-

SOD0.0' 

4000.0-

3000.0-

2000.0-

0.0 

11.0 

fttrfif^rv^-*-*-^ 

I

S»n(4aNar[M:1mc1ia401a13S' SamptoH):-IJCS-1 10328-6' F^:-nKl104D1a.Jir' 

PeakNwne:-13C4PFOS-SurT* Mas»(a«): ^03.000/80J»0 Da* 

Convnert:'2ppti LCS" Annotation: *-

Sample Index: 13t 

Sample Type: OC 

Concentcatlon: 1.89 ng/mL 

Calculated Conc: l.SO ng/mL 

Acq. Date; 4/3/2011 

Acq. Time: 12:09:50 PM 

I

SamF4a Name: -mc110401a031' Sompta ID: '1100220' Fll«: 'mcl 10401a.wtr 

Paak Name: *13C4PFOS-SurT' Mast{aa):'503.000/BO.OOO Da' 

Comment'Method BtanlC AnrwOUon;** 

Sample Index: 31 

Sample Type: Unknown 

Concentration: (t/A 

Calculated Conc: < 0 

Acq. Date: 4/2/2011 

Acq. Tims: 12:03:49 AM 

HDIB. 

Algoritha : Si>ecify Pai 

Percentage : 50 

1.00 

Kters - KQ III 

Base. Sub. Wlndoi 

Peak-Split. Fact' 

Report Largest Pi 

Min. Peah Height 

Hln. Peah width: 

Smoothing Width: 

RT Window: 

Expected RT: 

Int . Type: 

Area: 

Height: 

End Time; 

13.1 mln 

930 count* 

3.76e-t002 cps 

13.1 mln 

I

Sam(4eKama:'mc1ia401a139' Samf4alD:TCS-11032fr^ Fie:"met 10401 a.witT 

Peak Name: •13C4PFOS-Sufr' U«»»(e»):'503.000raOJ»0 Da' 

Comment:-lOppfa LCS* Amotatton:" 

Sample Index: 139 

Sample Type: QC 

Concentration: 0.00 ng/nL 

Calculated Conc: 0.00203 ng/mL 

4/3/201: 

l:ll:3 e 

Proc. Algotithn : Specify Paraaai 

Noise Percentage ; 50 

Baae. Sub. Window: 1.00 ml: 

Peak-Split. Factor; 2 

Report Largest Pea>:: Ves 

Mln. Peak Height: O.Oi 

Proc 

Kola. 

PeakRepoi 

Mln. 

suool 

Algorithm: 

Percentage 

Spll 

•eak 

•eak 

ling 

. Fact 

geat P 

Height 

Width: 

Expected RT: 

Dse R 

Int . 

Betei 

Area: 

ela t 

Height: 

ve RT: 

No 

Spec 

3 0 

fv 

50 

2 

Par am 

0 

0 

Mo 

Base 

71800 

.;Ba 

T o 

0 0 

B i n 

Baae 

• i n 

004 cps 

1.7e4 

1.6*4 

1.5M 

1.4*4 

1Jte4 

1.2a4 

1.1*4 

j M0O.O 

" eoDo.o 

7000.0 

6000.0 

5000.0 

4000.0 

3000.0 

2000.0 

1000.0 

0.0-

13 .05 

L ..,„,«.*-#T*f^'*^r^tH. U 

Smoothi! 

14.6 15.0 15.5 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:33:35 PM 

Page 1 of 7 

Page 51 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0401a.rdb 

I

SBm[)leName:'me1l0401a148- Samp<ilD:^CS-110328-14' Flla:*me110401a.««lfr 

Peakr4ame:*13C4PFOS.'Sun* Masqat):'S03J)OIVSO.OOO Da' 

Conimert:'2ppbLCSECr Annotalton:- I

Sarn(4aNama:'nKl10401a16r Sample ID: ICS'110328-17* Fla:'mdl 0401 a.wHr 

P*akNanM:*13C4PF0S-Surr Uasat**);'&03JXXV80J)00 Da' 

Comment *10ppb LCS ECr AnooWJon:-

Sample Index: 

Concentration: 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq . Date: 

Acq. Tine: 

148 

OC 

4/3/201 

4:1«:55 PM 

Pesk-Spll 

Report La 

Hln . Peak 

Smoothing 

R T Window 

. Factor 

gest Peak: 

Height: 

Width: 

Expected RT : 

U ae Relet 

Int. Typo 

Area: 

Height : 

Start Tim 

E nd Time : 

v e RT : 

13 

No 

Base 

es 

I. 

n 

SI 

res 

0 

n 

1 

ro 

n 

3e*00 

13 

13 2 

00 

00 

aec 

Base 

min 

•in 

win 

1.0e4 

9000.0-

sample Type : 

Concentration: 

Calculated Conc ; 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time : 

Hodified: 

Proc. Algoritha; 

Noise Percent age: 

Base . Sub. Hlndow 

Peak-Spilt. Facto 

Report Largest Pe 

Mln. Peak Height: 

Min. Peak width; 

Smoothing Width: 

RT Window: 

Use Relative RT : 

Int. Type : 

OC 

0.0103 

/3/201 

:18:44 

Ho 

pecify 

50 

PM 

Par 

1,00 

0 

0 

13.1 

Ho 

3ase To 

13.0 

no 

g/mL 

ng/BL 

Ra;i 

m n 

I

Samp4eNMne:^mc110401e065' Sample ID:'OLP1CK)1-02>14-021' Fle:-mc1104D1a.viiifr 

Peak Name; 13C4PFOS-Sun' Maas(«t): *S03.000/80.000 Da* 

Convnent'DALGWMFLIiiW0201103Z2- AimotaSon:** 

Sample Indei: i i 

Sample Type: Unknown 

Concentration: H/A 

Calculated Conc: O.103 ng/nL 

Acq. Date: 4/2/2011 

Acq. Time: 11:48:13 AM 

I

San ^ Nanw: 'mc11040l809r Sanple ID: 'GLP10-01-02-14-045' Fie: "mcl 10401 a.wir 

Peak Name: *13C4PFOS-Surr* Mata<et): *S03.000/80.000 Da' 

Comment-DM.GWMFLMWDS0110323* AiwwMion:" 

Sample Index: 97 

Sample Type; Unknown 

ng/nL 

1500' 

1400-

1300-

1200-

1100-

1000-

Modified: 

Proc . Algorithm: 

Hoise Percentage 

Base . Sub. windo 

H 

Spec 

Peak-Split. Factor: 

Report Largest Peak: 

Min . Peak Height 

Mln . Peak width: 

Smoothing Width: 

D se Relative RT : 

Int. Type: 

Area : 

Height ; 

30 

fy Paran 

2 

Yes 

0 aec 

.1 min 

Ho 

Bas e 

6762 

.67e 

T o Base 

003 cps 

Calculated Conc ; 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time : 

Modified; 

Proc. Algorithm; 

Holse Percentage 

Base. Sub. Wind o 

0.0866 

4/2/2011 

10:4G:S4 P 

specify Pa 

1.00 

Pesk-Spllt. Factor: 2 

Report Largest Peak; Yes 

Hln. Peah Height 

Mln. Peak width: 

Smoothing Width: 

RT Window: 

Expected RT : 

Use Relative RT : 

Retention Time: 

Area: 

Height! 

0.00 

0 

30.0 

Bo 

Baae To Ba 

13.1 

SS59 cou 

.7e«»003 

11.15 11JU 1M9 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:33:35 PM 

Page 2 of 7 

12^ lis 13J> 133 14JJ 145 

Page 52 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0401a.rdb 

I

Sanple Mame: 'mclili401a115'^ampto ID:-GLPKM) 1-02-14-05r Fie: 'me11O401a.wBr 

Peak Name:-13C4PFOS-Sun' Mas*(as): *603J)OOfSOJ)00 Da* 

Ca(Tvnent'DALGWMFLMW13D0110323* Amotaaon:" 

Sample Index: ItS 

I

Sample Mama: 'mc11O401a020' Sample ID: '10007>32 ^ File; 'mdl040 1 alwHT 

P*Bk Name: *13C8PFOS-IS(ISr MBis<es}: "507.00080.000 Da' 

Commant'23ne/mLFCttdInSymh.Water ' Annotation:** 

Sample Type 

Concentrati 

Calculated 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Tlee : 

Modified: 

Proc . Algor 

Baae. Sub. 

Peak-Split . 

Report Lar? 

Mln. Paak fi 

Mln. Peak f> 

Unknown 

;onc: 0.0826 ng 

4/3/2011 

Ho 

thm: Specify Param 

itage; 50 

St Peak: Yes 

sight: 0.00 

dth: 0.00 

RT Window: 

Expected RT 

Use Relatl v 

Int . Type: 

Retention T 

Area: 

Height: 

Start Tine: 

30.0 sec 

13.1 aiin 

a RT: Ho 

Base To Base 

me: 13.1 nin 

397B counts 

13.0 mln 

I Samplal4ame:*mc110401a031' Sam(>leC:'11002-20' F|e:*r 

Peak Name:-13CePFOS.IS(IS)' Hats<M): *S07.00Q/BO.OOO Da ' 

I CommerC"WelhodBlank* AmtotaOon: ' 

11.0 11 3 12J3 133 14J> 143 15J) 15.5 

Sample Type: 

Calculated Coi 

Hodified: 

Proc. Algoritlio: Spi 

Hoise Percentage: 

Base. Sub. window: 

. Peak Height; 

Retentioi 

Height: 

9500.00 

9000.00 

SSOOJ»-

8000J»-

7500.00' 

700030-

6500JMB0O0.0O5 

^550030 -

I 5000.00-

450030-

4000.00-

3500.00-

3000.00-

2600.00-

200030-

1500.00-

1000.00-

500.00-

0.00- ^-A-^ 113 

I

Sample Mame:'mc^10401a136* Sample ID:'LCS-11032&«' Fle:'mc110401a.wir 

Peak Name: *13C8PFQS-lS{ISr U»w(es): •507300/80.000 Da ' 

Commant '2p(>b UCS' Annotation:" 

Sample Index: 136 

Sanple Type: QC 

Concentration: 0.951 ng/oL 

Calculat e Calculated Conc; N/A 

Acq. Date 

Acq. Tine 

Modified: 

Conc: 

Proc. Algorithm: 

Baae. Sub 

Peak-Spli 

Report La 

Min. Peak 

Miti. Peak 

Smoothing 

BT Window 

4/ 

12 

H/A 

/201 

08:4 

re s 

Specify 

. Factor: 

gest Peak 

Height 

Width; 

Expected RT: 

ase Rela t 

Int . Type 

Area: 

Height: 

ve BT: 

Time: 

Start Tine : 

End Tloe : 

50 

AH 

Parameters 

3 

0 

0.0 

13.0 

Mo 

Base To 

n . o 

1997 

13.2 

00 

mi 

Rase 

nl 

cp 

cps 

1.3*4 

13*4 

1.2*4 

1.2*4 

1.1*4 

1.1*4 

1.0*4 

95003 

9000.0 

8500.0 

80003 

75003 

70003 

65003 

6000.0 

55003 

50003 

45003 

40003 

3500.0 

30003 

25003 

20003 

16003 

10003 

500.0 

on 

Acq. Time 

Modified: 

Proc. Algc 

Noise Par 

Baae. Sub 

Peak-Spli 

Report La 

Min. Peak 

RT Window 

tlthm: 

12:0 :50 PM 

g 

specify Pars 

gest Peak: 

Height 

Expected RT: 

Uae Relat 

Int . Type 

Retention 

Height: 

ve RT: 

Time; 

30 

1 

Base 

9827 

.S4e 

3 

0 

0 s< 

.0 m 

To Beat 

.0 m 

00 3 CF 

9500 

9000 

8500 

BOOO 

7500 

7000 

6500 

6000 

6500 

5000 

4500 

4000 

3500 

3000 

2500 

2000 

1500 

1000 

500 

... . i 1 . i . 

TV^-"* ' 

153 163 

Data printed by STH 

Printing Time: 2:33:35 PM 

Page 3 of 7 

Page 53 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0401a.rdb 

I

Sample Name: •ync110401a139' Sampto ID: •LCS-110328^" Fto:'mc110401a.wW 

Paak Nam*: '13C8PFOS-)S(ISr MBS»(e«): '507.000/80.000 Da' 

Comment'10ppt> LCS' Anootsaon:" 

Sample Type: OC 

Concentration: 0.95* ng/mL 

Calculated Conc: H/A 

Acq. Date: 4/3/2011 

Acq. Tiae: 1:11:36 PM 

I

Sampi*Name:'mc1l6401a14S' SamptolD:'LCS-11032a-14- Ft*:'mc110401«.wUr 

Paak Nam*:'13C8PFOS-IS(IS)' Mas»(e9);-507300^0.000 Da' 

Commant'2ppb LCS ECF- AimotaSon:-

Saapla Index: 14S 

Sample Type; OC 

Concentration; 0.952 ng/mL 1.1Sa4' 

Proc . Algor ithm: Specify P 

Holse Percentage ; SO 

Peak-Split. 

Report Larg 

Factor: 3 

St Peak: Yes 

Mln. Peak Height: 0.0 

Min. Peak M dth : 0.0 

Smoothing Width: 0 

RT Window: 

Expected RT 

Use Relatl v 

Int . Type: 

Area: 

Height: 

30.0 

13.0 

RT: Ho 

Base To Bi 

l.iee.00 4 

SanvtoNamB:'mc110401a151' Stti^lb:-Lc^^10328-ir Fie: Wl10401a.witr 

~ ' " «: •13C8PFOS-IS<ISr M«n(e«):'507.000/80.000 Da' 

lOppb LCS ECF- - - -

Sample Index; 151 

Acq . 

Acq . 

Dat e 

Tim e 

Hodified : 

Pro c Algorithm : 

Bas e 

Pea k 

S u b 

Nin . 

RT W 

Pea k 

ndo w 

4/3 / 

4:1 6 

O i l 

5 5 PM 

Y e s 

Spe c 

Window ; 

. Factor : 

ges t Peak : 

Heigh t 

Width : 

Expecte d ;T: 

Int . 

Het q 

Typ e 

t , 

v e RT : 

30 

f y Pa r 

5 0 

1.0 0 

T e s 

0.0 0 

0.0 0 

0 s o 

. 0 mi n 

No 

Bas e 

686 1 

T o Ba s 

. 0 B 

003°" " I 

113 133 133 14.0 143 153 153 

SwnptoName:-mc110401a06S' Sampto K>:'OLP1(H>I-02-14-021* Fle:-mc110401a.wir 

Peak Name: *13CePFOS45(l5)- Maiafet): *S07.00Q/B0300 Da* 

Commant-DAL GW MFL MW02 0 11032r Annotation:" 

Sample Index: £5 

Sample Type: Unknown 

Concentration: 0.9E0 ng/mL 

004 cps 

.2 mln i 

1 

1.4*4 

1.4*4 

1.3*4 

13*4 

1.2*4 

1.2M 

1.1*4 

1.1*4 

1.0*4 

95003 

90003 

85003 

eooao 

7500.0 

7000.0 

K003 

60003 

55003 

6000.0 

45003 

4000.0 

35003 

3000.0 

26003 

2000.0 

15003 

10003 

500.0 

..... _ V,.. , -..,....v> . L... ...-«^ 

14.91 

14.09. 

, ^ 

15.08 

I l,< n 4 

1 

' 

U 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:33:35 PM 

Page 4 of 7 

Page 54 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0401a.rd b 

I

i<mptoName:'mc110401aOSr SamfilaID;'GLPICKII-02-14-045' FlB:'mc110401s.«i«r 

P*8kN«na:-13C8PFO&e<lSr Ma»(*t):'50730000.000 Da' 

CoiTniefit:-DALGWMFLI4W050110323' AnootstMn;-

Sample Index: 97 

Sample Type: Unknown 

Concentration: 0.960 ng/nL 

Acq. Date: 4/2/2011 

Acq. Tine : 10:46:54 PH 

ritha ; Specify Paranett 

I

San^Name:*mc110401a116' Sampto b:'GLP1IV01-O2-14.O57- Fl*:'mc1ia401a.««r 

Paak Name: MSCSPFOS-ISOSr M«as<as): •S0730aW).000 Da* 

ConwuarrfDALGWUFLfclWISDOIIOaZa* ," • -

Sample Indai: 115 

Ssstple Type: Unknown 

Concentration : 0.960 ng/mL 

Acq. Date: 4/3/2011 

Acq. Tine : 4:57:31 AM 

Hodified: Yes 

Proc. Algorithm: Specify Paraaeters • 

Noise Percentage : 50 

Base. Sub. window: 1.00 min 

Peak-Split . Factor: 3 

Report Largest Peah: Yes 

Hin. Peak Height: O.OO cps 

Hin. Peak Width: O.OO sec 

Smoothing Width: 0 polnti 

Holse Per 

Base, sub 

Peak-Spli 

entag . 

Wlnde wReport Largest Pea 

Hln. Paak 

Min. Peak 

Smoothing 

RT Window 

Heigh 

Hldth 

Width 

Expected RT: 

Use Relat 

Int . Type 

Retention 

Height; 

End Time: 

ve RT 

30. 

No 

.00 

Yes 

0.00 

0.00 

0 

se 

0 a i 

Base To Base 

i.i 

0 n i 

7et004 cp 

13 

13 2 n i 

13*4 

1.4*4 

1j4e4 

13M 

13*4 

1.2*4 

1.2*4 

1.1.4 

1.1*4 

13*4 

95003 

90003 

8500. 

5 80003 

^ 75003 

1 70003 

^ 6600 3 

6000 3 

5500 3 

5O0O3 

4500 3 

4000 3 

3SD03 

3000 3 

2500 3 

2000 3 

1500 3 

10003 -

500. 

13.05 

L.,KV4 

15.14 

15.00.^,1] 

In 

J / i J Usf 

113 

Height: 

13.2 min 

sooo 

8500 

8000 

7500 

7O0O 

6600 

6000 

6600 

6000 

4500 

4000 

3500 

3000 

2000 

1500 

,00 0 

500 

>• • H M *«-U,--. 

113 113 133 143 143 153 

I

Sam|daName:'mc1iO4Oia031' Samf4a ID:'11002^0' Fae:'mc110401a.«>ur 

Peak Name: *PFOS-1* Ma*a(e*):*439.00U8O300Da.499.000re9300Da.49930(V1X.000Da* 

Comment-Method Blank' AmoUbon:-

Ssi^l e Index: 31 

Sample Type: Unknown 

I

San^Nama:1mc110401a020' Sampto ID:-10007-32-^)9' F>e:'mc110401a.iNtfr 

Paak Hame:-PFOS-r Uas*(ea}:'49930(VS0.000Oa,499.00a99.O0ODa.499.00af130300Da' 

Commenf23n9*nLFC«ldInSjrth.Water" Annotaflon:-

Sanple Index; 20 

Type: Standard 

3.0*4-

23*4-

23*4 

2.7e4-

23e4-

23e4-

2.4*4-

2.3S4-

2.2*4-

2.1*4 

2.0*4' 

13e4 -

1.2e4-

1.1e4-

Samp • Type 

Concentrati 

Acq. 

late d 

Date: 

Time: 

Hodified: 

Hois. 

Base 

PeakRepo 

Hin. 

Mln. 

RT W 

Expec 

Use B 

Int . 

Algor 

t Larg. 

Peak H 

nlng W 

ted RT 

elativ . 

Retentio n T 

Area 

Heigh t : 

thm: 

tage 

Indc 

Standa r 

1.50 

4/1/201 

8:22:34 

Ho 

Specify 

50 

1. 

St Peak: Y. 

Iqht 

RT: 

0 

0 

0 

No 

Valley 

126652 c 

.04e>0a4 

1.004-

90003-

80003-

70003-

60003-

60003-

40003-

3000.0-

20003-

10003-

03 

Calculated 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time; 

Modified: 

Conc: 

ithn ; 

Noise Percentage 

Base. Sub. 

Peak-Split 

Report Lar 

Tact 

0.0972 

4/2/2011 

12:0B:49 Al 

Yes 

Specify Pa 

50 

: 1.00 

e st Peak: Yes 

Mln. Peak Height 

Mln. Peak idth : 

Smoothing width: 

RT Window: 

Expected RT: 

Use Relativ e RT: 

Area: 

Height: 

End Time; 

ime: 

0.00 

0.00 

30.0 

13.1 

Ho 

Manual 

B725 cou 

.26et003 

13.2 

^.t^'i^^.M^H.Mr^'f^ ^ 

Data printe d by STW 

Printin g Time: 2:33:3 6 PM 

12.0 123 133 133 14.0 143 153 153 

Page 5 of 7 

123 133 133 143 143 15.0 

Page 55 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS. and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0401a.rdb 

I

SamptoNam*:-mc110401a136' Sampto ID: •LCS-11032»*' Fie:-me110401a.wtfr 

Paak Name: •PFOS-I* Mass(**): '499.000/80.000 Da,499.000/99.000 Da.499.000/130.000 Da' 

Conmant *2ptfc Las' AfWMtatkn: " 

Sample Index: 136 

Sample Type; QC 

Concentration: 1.98 ng/mL 

Calculated Conc: 1.98 ng/mL 

Acq. Date: 4/3/2011 

Acq. Time: 12:09:50 PM 

I

Sampto Name:'mc110401a139* SanvtolD:'LCS-11032S-8' Fla:-mc110401a.Mr 

Paak Name: TFOS-1' Ma*s(*s); '499.000/80.000 Da,499.000/99.000 Da.499.00(V130300 Da' 

Comment "lOppb LCS* Anrwtefioo: -

Sample Index; 139 

Sample Type; OC 

Concentration: 9.94 ng/nL 

calculated Conc: 11.4 ng/nL 

Acq. Date: 4/3/2011 1-5*5-

Proc. Algorithm 

Hoiae Percentagi 

Base. Sub. wlnd< 

Specify Paraiw 

Peak-Split. Factor: 1 

Report Largest : 

Mln. Peak Heigh 

Mln. Peak Width 

Smoothing width 

Expected RT: 

Dse Relative RT 

Retention Tine: 

Height: 

Stait Tine: 

End Tine: 

Bak: Yes 

: 0.00 c 

30.0 sec 

13.1 Bin 

Ho 

Valley 

14631 counts 

2.41e»0O4 cps 

13.0 Bin 

13.2 min 

113 113 123 133 133 143 143 15.0 153 

I

Sampto Name:'mc110401a14ff' ^wrvfa ID: t.CS-110323-14* F)a:'mc11o4oia.«iiiT' 

Paak Mama: TF0S>1* Uas«(e*):'499.000/80300 Da,490300fgg300Da,499.00Q/130300 Da* 

Ccnanent *2ppfa LCS ECF* Annotatnn:~ 

Sample Typi 

Ion: 2.00 

Acq. .:3 6 PM 

Modified: 

Proc. Algoritha: 

Noise Percentage 

Basa. Sub. Wlndo' 

Peak-Split. Facto 

Report Largest p. 

Hln. Peak Height 

Hln. Peak Width: 

Smoothing width: 

RT Window: 

Expected RT: 

Use Relative RI: 

Int. Type: 

Area: 6 

Height: 

Ho 

Specify 

: 1.0 

r: 2 

ak: Ye 

30.0 

13.1 

Ho 

Valley 

13.1 

.56e-.005 

Samt4e Name: "mcl 10401 alii* Sampto 10: 'LCS-110328-ir Fla: -mc110401a.wir 

P«ak Name:-PFOS-1* UBsa(et): •499300^80.000 Oa.499.00a99.000Da.4993OW130300 Da* 

Comment 'lOppb LCS ECP AnnotaOon: "• 

Sample Index; '. 

54*4 

6.2a4 

53a4 

43*4 

4.6*4-

44*4-

42*4-

4.0*4-

33*4-

3.6*4. 

3.4*4-

3.2*4-

33M23*4-

2.6*4-

Z4a4-

2.2*4-

2.0*4-

13*4-

Calculated Conc 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time: 

Hodified: 

Proc. Algoritha 

Hoise Percentag 

Base. Sub. Wind 

2.35 

4/3/2011 

4:16:55 PM 

Yes 

Specify Pat 

Peak-Split. Factor: 2 

Report Largest Peak: Yes 

Min. Peak Heigh 

Smoothing Width 

RT Window: 

Expected RT: 

Use Relative RT 

Int. Type: 

Retention Time: 

Area: 

Height: 

0 

30.0 a 

13.1 B 

No 

Manual 

13.1 B 

1.7ie-.004 c 

80003 

60003 

4000.0 

20003 

03 

123 133 133 143 143 153 153 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:33:36 PM 

Page 6 of 7 

Page 56 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0401a.rdb 

I

SarnptoNama:'mc1l0401a065- SwnptoE>:'GLP1 Ml-02-14421' Fla:tncl 10401 a.M0r 

Paak Name: TFOS-1* Ua3a(ai):'49930(V8aOOODa.499.00(V99.000Da,49930Q/130300Da' 

Commant *DAL GW MFL MW02 0110327 

Sample Type: Unknown 

1.2e4-

1J*4-

Calculated Conc; .42 

Acq. Date: 4/2/2011 

Acq. Time: 11;4 

Hodified: t 

Proc. Algorithm: Spe> 

Base. Sub. Window: 

Peak-Split. Factor: 

Report Largest Peak: 

Hin. Peak Height; 

Mln. Peek width: 

Snoothing Width: 

B;13 Ah 

es 

ify Pa 

1.00 

Yes 

0.00 

0 

1.53e4004 

1.0*4-

9500.0-

90O03-

8500.0-

' 80003-

56003-

5000.0-

45003-

40003 

35003 

30003 

25003 

20003 

15003 

10003 

S0O.O 

0 3 

113 

•I ^1 I U-4t*MO< ^ 

I

San»toNam*:-mcl104ila09r S«>»tolD:'GLP1CMI1-02-i4-045' 

PaA Name: TFOS-1' hbss(es):'499300^0300 D«.499,00(VB9.000 Di 

Con*nent"DALGWMFLMVWO50110323 " 

Sample Type: 

Calculated Conc 

Acq. Time; 

Hodified; 

Proc. Algorithm 

Noise Percentag 

Base. Sub. Wind 

Peak-Split. Fee 

Report Largest 

Hln. Peak Heigh 

Mln. Peak Width 

Ssmothing Width 

RT Window: 

Use Relative RT 

Area: 

Height: 

Start Tine: 

End Time: 

2.18 

4/2/201 

10:46:5 

Yea 

: 50 

ng/nL 

PM 

eak: Yes 

: 0 

30.0 

13.1 

No 

Manual 

13.1 

S428S < 

12.6 

13.2 

00 cpa 

nin • 13e4-

9000.0-

80003-

7000.0-

60O0.O50003-

4000.0-

30003-

12.88.. 

M i l . "'^.' I I'lr**^'! 

I

SttT<ptoNam«:'mc11O40la115' Sampto ID:'OLP10-01-02-14-05r Fla:-mc110401a.«iar 

Peak Name:-PFOS-r Uau(ea):'499300nn.OOODa,499.000/99.000Da,499300/130300 ba' 

Camment-DALGWMFLUW130D11032T AimtaOon:' 

Stapl e Index: US 

Sample Type: Unknown 

Concentration: H/A 

Calculated Conc: 8.76 ng/nL «x-* 

Acq. Date: 4/3/2011 O-"* 

Acq. Tl«e: 4:57:31 AM 

Yes 6.0*4-

, Sub. Wint 

Hln. Peak Height: 

Hin. Peak Width: 

Snoothing width: 

Height: 

End Tine : 

12.0 123 133 133 14.0 143 16.0 153 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:33:36 PM 

Page 7 of 7 

Page 57 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

/Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landflll - M/\rch 2011 

Results Name: ltll0404a.rdb 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:35:37 PM 

Printing Date: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 

Page 1 of 1 

Page 58 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Monris Farm Landfill - M/\rch 2011 

Results Name: kll0404a.rdb 

|||S«n«4aN»n.:-k110404«020' k,^iD:-V>007^2 ^ FJ.:-k110404a.»lir 

1 PM * Nam*: '13CePFOS4S0Sr Maa.(w): •507.000«0300 Da' 

• Comment*13nB'mLFCstdhSynth.Watai' Annotation:*' 

Sample Index: 20 

J Sample Typa; Standard ,1;, , 

1 Concentration: 0.960 ng/mL 

calculate d conc: N/A 1900 

Acq. Date: 4/4/2011 

Acq. Time: 8:44:39 PH 1BOO 

Proc. Algoritha : IntelliQuan - IQA II ^TM° 

Min. Peak Height: 0.00 cps 

Min. Paak Width: 0.00 see '» " 

Smoothing Width: 0 points 

KT Window: 30.0 aec 1500 

Eipected RT: IS.3 min 

Use Relative RT: No 140O 

Int . Type: Valley ,3^ ^ 

Retention Time: IS.3 mln * " 

Height: 1.95e+003 cps l^"* 

Start Time: 15.2 mln 

$ 1000 

1 ^^ 

800 

700 

600 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

1 17 73 

111 .1 HiLiil JILJLIIJ jilJUlr i 

...i^^^.i...uiii.jk«i»wu«Ma»4jjj. k/UMUUWltWWVI/rflr' •' 

133 13.5 14.0 143 15.0 153 163 183 173 173 

1 sample Name: •V110404a035' Samfto K):'QlPI 001^14-004 ' Flto:-k110404a.wlir TtTM,TM 

I Peak Name: -13C8PFOS-IS(IS)* Mas«{es): '50730a'80.000 Da' 

• Comment-OALGWMFLMW100110322' AnnotaUon:* 

Sample Index: 35 

Sample Type: Unknown 1^^^, 

Concentration: 0.960 ng/oL 3800 

Calculated Conc: N/A 

Acq. Pate : 4/5/2011 36OO 

Acq. Time: 2:01:08 AH 

»al,i.<„ , „ « » 

Proc. Algorithm: IntelliQua n - lOA II 

Min. Peak Height: 0.00 cpa 3200 

Smoothing Width: 0 points 3000 

BT Window: 30.0 sec 

Expected BT: 15.3 min jBOO 

int . Type; Valley ^600 

Retention Time: 15.3 al n 

Area: 24563 counts 2400 

Height: 3.79e-»003 cps 

Start Tine : 15.2 min 2200 

End Time: 15.5 nin -

1 "" 1 ,«». 

1600-

1400-

1200-

1000-

BOO' 

600-

400-

200- 1 

. ^ .....,.., ,...1-...., .M J ^.Mi .^jw.u«..M**4hWM^ 

133 13.8 14.0 14.5 153 153 163 183 1^3 17.5 

Hsamplirtom.:>1104O4a029' Sample ID:'11002-2Cr Fi,:>llQ404a. ^ 

• P*akNamK'13C8PFOS<IS(ISr Uass<*s):'507300^0300 Da' 

Sample Inde«: 29 

Sample Type: Unknown 

Concentration: 0.960 ng/nL 4600 

Calculated Conc: K/A 

Acq. Date: 4/4/2011 4400 

Acq. Ti»a: 11:54:33 PH 

4200 

Modified: Ho , ^ 

Proc. Algorithm: IntelliQua n - IQA II 4000 

Min. Peak Height: 0.00 cps 

Mln. Peak width: 0.00 sec •**^ 

Smoothing Width; 0 points 3TM, 

BT Window: 30.0 aec •"* " 

Expected RT: 15.3 min -TM. 

Uae Belativ e RT: So 

3200 

Retention Tine; 15.3 min 300O 

Area; 30840 counts 

Height: 4.6]e>003 cps 2800 

Start Time: 15.2 min 

End Time: 15.5 min , 2600 

1 2400 

1 2200 

2000 

1800 

1600 

1400 

1200 

1000 

800 

600 

400 

200 

133 133 143 

1 SarrvUMama:'k110404a047^ SamplelD:-GLP1fc01-02-14O13^ t**:^k110«>4a.wln' 

I PeekName:'13C8PFOS4S<lsr Ma*a(e8): •507.OOW80.000 Da' 

• Comment-DALGWMFLPi4W01DO11032r AnnotaUon:-

Sanple Index: 47 

Sample Typo: Unknown 

Concentration: 0.960 ng/mL 

calculate d Conc: H/A 5.0*4 

Acq. Date: 4/5/2011 .. . 

Acq. Time: 6:14:31 AM *'' * 

4.6*4 

Modified: Tea 

Proc. Algorithm: Specify Parameters - HQ III 4.4*4 

Noise Percentage : 50 

Base. Sub. window: 1.00 lain *•*•• 

Paak-Split. Factor: Z 4^5^ 

Report Largest Peak: Yes 

Nin. Peak Height: 0.00 cps 33*4 

Smoothing width; 0 points 3.6*4 

RT window: 30.0 sec ,^ ^ 

Expected RT: 15.3 .i n ** ^ 

Use Relative RT: Ho 3.2*4 

Int . Type: Base To Base 3.0*4 

Retention Time: 15.4 nin _ 

Area: 20*18 counts §• ^3*4 

Height: 3.22et003 cpe ^ 2.tSm4 

Start Tine : IS.2 min f 

End Time: IS.6 nin | 2.4*4 

2.2*4 

2.0*4 

13*4 

1.6*4 

1.4*4 

1.2*4 

1.0*4 

8000.0 

6000.0 

40003 

2000.0' 

°-° '.i^'• • ii i • 

1 i 1 

1 1 1 

• 1 • 

143 163 153 16.0 

Time, mln 

ij 

17.3S., IIL/ T 

16.5 173 173 

16 in 1 

1536 

143 143 1^3 li i 1 s 16.0 

\ 

163 173 • 173 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:38:28 PM 

Printing Date: Wednesday, May 04, 

Page 1 of 7 

Page 59 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

/Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Results Name: kll0404a.rdb 

• sam^Nan>.:T(110404.054- Samptab: 

n I Peak Name: '13CSPF0S-IS{ISr Mawf**) 

I CommanfDALGWMFLMW010110322' 

U Sample tnde;i: 54 

1 Sample Type: Unknown 

1 Concentration: 0.960 ng/nL 

n Calculated Conc: H/A 

Acq. Date: 4/5/2011 

H Acq. Time; 8:42:11 AK 

1 Hodified: No 

1 Proc. Algorlthn : IntelliQua n - IQA 

nHln . Peak Height: O.OD cpa 

Mln. Peak Width: 0.00 aec 

a Smoothing Width: 0 points 

1 BT Window: 30.0 sec 

1 Expected RTi 15.3 Bin 

1 Use Belativ e BT: No 

Int . Type: Valley 

H Retention Time: 15.3 Bin 

1 Area: 2O007 counta 

1 Height: 3.2Se*003 cps 

B Start Tine : 15.3 Bin 

1 End Tine : 15.5 Bin 

I Sampi.kama:'k1l0404aOyi' im^to T 

• Peak Name:'13CaPFO&4S{lsr Maas(*t>: 

I Commant "DAL GWMFL MWO4D0110323 

sample Index: 71 

Saaple Type: Unknown 

, Concentration: 0.960 ng/sL 

Calculated Conc: N/A 

Acq. Date: 4/5/2011 

Acq. Time: 2:41:13 PH 

HodiCied: Yes 

Proc. Algorithm: IntelliQua n - IQA 

Hin. Peak Height: 0.00 cps 

Mln. Peak Width: 0.00 sec 

Snoothing Width: 0 potnt a 

BT Window: 30.0 sec 

Expected BT: 15.3 nin 

Use Belativ e RT: Ho 

Int . Typo; Valley 

Retention Tine: 15.3 Bin 

Area: 8723 counti 

Height: I.30e>003 cps 

Start Tine : IS.3 Bin 

End Time: 15.5 mln 

GLP1(M31.02.14*ir FlU:'M10404a.wir 

'507.0O0«O.0OODa' 

AnooCaSon:-

3200 

3000 

II 2800 

2600 

2400 

2200 

2000 

1 '•" 

^ 1600 

1400 

1200 

1000 

800 

600 

400 

200 

J .l .. . J.. ... . i... 

133 133 143 

GLP1W)1.02.14.*llJ Na:S!l10404a.*tfr " 

-507.000/80.000 Da* 

Annolatton:-

1300 

1250 

1200 

1150 

II 

1100 

1050 

1000 

oso 

900 

850 

BOO 

750 

5 700 

I" 650 

1 «» 

550 

500 

450 

400 

350 

300 

250 

200-

150 

100-

50 

lul>L.Li...i..Ul....l.UJlLllAi 

133 li s 143 

14.5 

1431.., 14.67 

14.5 

i5.-3a 

_.... L._ . Jta(»i~>UAJiA«*^^ 

153 153 163 163 173 173 

1535 

• H 1 

• 1 Hi 1 

H it J 

151 M ^^"* Y'^YlA^ XJITI 

153 1^3 163 ld 3 • 173 1^3 " 

||Sampl,N»n*:-kl^6404aOG6' SampklD:-6LJ'1(X.l-02-144>i3' Fl.:-k110404..wir 

1 PeakN«me:-13C«PFO&4S(ISr Masa(*«):•507.OOOWO.000Da* 

• Commwit'DAl.GWMFLMW03O0110323' AnrotsUon:-

SaBple Index: 66 

SaBple Type: Unknown ,5 „ 

Concentration: 0.960 ng/aiL -^ ^ 

calculate d Conc: K/A '^ ^ 

Acq. Date: 4/5/2011 

Acq. Time: 12:55:34 PM 3400 

Modified: Ho 3200 

Proc. Algorithm: IntelliQuan - IQA II 

Hin. Peak Height: 0.00 cps 

Hin. Peak Width: 0.00 sec •»*^ 

Smoothing Width: 0 points 

RT Window: 30.0 aec 2800 

Expected RT: 15.3 nin 

Uae Relativ e BT: Ho 26OO 

Int . Type: Valley 

Retention Time; 15.3 Bin Z400 

Area: 22996 counts 

Height: 3.64et003 cps 2200 

Start Tine: 15.2 Bin 

1 ,»» 

1400 

1200 

1000 

800 

600 

400 

200 

1 1 1 1 1 1 

133 133 143 143 153 1S.r 

1 SMrfE;>Jame:-i.1104O4aOBr W4)lalD:M.Cd-n032ftJ' |!la:-k110404a.««ltr 

• Comment'0.2ppb LCS* Annotatton:" 

Sanplt Index: 81 

Sanple Type: QC ,5, 7 

Concentration: 0.951 ng/mL 

calculate d Conc: N/A TM 

Acq. date : 4/5/2011 

Acq. Time: 8:19:14 PM ^ ^ 

Modified: Ho 

Proc. AlgorlthB: IntelliQua n - IQA II 

Min. Peak Height: 0.00 cps *TM 

Smoothing width; 0 points 

RT Window: 30.0 sec 550 

E)(pected RT: 15.3 nin 

se e a t ve 0 ^ ^ 

Int . Type: Valley 

Retention Tine : 15.4 nin 

Area: 4575 counts 450 

Height: 7.00e*002 cps 

Start Time: 15.3 nin 

End Time; 15.5 nin . 400 

1 .. 

300 

250 

200 

150 

100' 

50 

1 

1 

I 

• 14.63 • 

14.48 

[.riiiiiiiii Sim 

133 133 143 14.5 153 1 ^ 

16.0 163 1^3 173 

17.69 

w 

T - 1 

16:78 1 11 1 1 II fl 

1632 

1 1537 16.26 j 

mM 

II 11 i 

16.0 163 1:^w 3 1^3 II 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:38:28 PM 

Printing Date: Wednesday, May 04, 

Page 2 of 1 

Page 60 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

Results Name: kll0404a.rdb 

I

Samp4aName;'V110404a090' SM^Ia ID:-LCS-11032»«* FSe:1(110404a.wirr 

Paak Name:'13C«PFOS4S(IS)* Masa{as):'507300/80.000 Da' 

Comment'2ppb LCS* AimolatlMi: 

3anple Index; 90 

Sanpla Type: QC 

Concentration; 0.951 

Calculated Conc; H/A 

4/5/2011 

I

8*rn(*«Name:'k1tO4O4a09r SOTptBlo:"LCS-1103284" FI*:ini0404a.<Mrr 

Paak Name; •13C8PFOS-IS(lsr Maas(**): *507.000n0.000 Da* 

Commant'lOppbLCS* AnnotaBon:-

anple Index: 93 

9:22:33 PM 

Modified: Mo 

Proc- AlgorlthB: Intel: 

Mln. Peak Height: 0.< 

Mln. Peak Width: 0.< 

Smoothing Width; 0 

BT Window; 

Use Belative 

5 . 3 

133 1 3 3 

I

Sam(4aName:1(11O4O4«1O0' Sam(4*ID:1.CS-110326-12' Rle:*k110404a.wtfr 

PMhNBma:'13C8PFOS4S(ISr M**«{e*):'507300JW)30Q Da* 

CommenL-OJIptALCSECP AnnotaOon:-

Sanple Index; 100 

Sample Type: QC 

Concentration; 0.951 ng/nL 2800-

Proc. Algorithm: IntelliQua n - IQA I 

Sample Type: 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Date; 

Acq. TlBe: 

Proc. Algorithm; 

Hin. Peak Height 

Min. PeaK Width; 

Smoothing Width; 

Expected BT: 

Use Relative RT: 

Int. Typa: 

Retention Tine; 

Are*; 

Height: 

QC 

0.954 

4/5/2011 

10:25:52 

IntelliC 

0 

30.0 

15.3 

Ho 

Valley 

15.4 

.44et003 

ng/mL 

PK 

an - IQA II 

points 

mln 

mln 

cps 

4400 

4000 

3200 

3000 

2800 

§ 2400-

5" 2200-

1 2000-

1800-

1600-

1400-

1200-

1000-

133 143 143 153 153 16.0 

I

Sample Name: •k11O464a103' Saffl(4*lDr*LCS-1103^8-1 fe' F4e:'kl10404a.wW 

Peak Name: '13C8PFOS4S(lsr MaM<**}: •507.000n0.000 Da' 

Commant-2ppt) LCS ECF" AnnotaSon:** 

Smoothing Hldth: 

BT Window; 

Expected RT; 

Baa^ To Base 

Height; 

End Time: 

Sample Type: 

Concentration; 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Tine: 

Hodified: 

Proc. Algorithm: 

Hin. Peak Height 

Min. Peak width: 

Smoothing Width: 

Expected BT; 

Use Relative RT: 

Int. Type: 

Area: 2 

Height; 

Start TiBe: 

End Time: 

OC 

0.952 

H/A 

4/6/2011 

1:57:07 

IntelliC 

O.OO 

0.00 

15.3 

Ho 

Valley 

1609 c 

.06e+003 

15.3 

15.6 

w 

lan - IQA I 

cpi 

sec 

points 

mln I 

t 1 

2800 

2600 

2200 

2000 

1600 

1400 

t,.»4. Jl4tt.l.AMft^aA,»riil|iflrt»W^*jtiwt.^ 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:38:28 PM 

Printing Date: Wednesday, May 04, 

Page 3 of 7 

153 153 

17.67 

Page 61 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS. and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-Kirk Results Name: kll0404a.rdb 

I

5am{4*Nam*:-K110404a106- S«nf)lalD:-LCS-110326-ia' Ffe:-k110404a.«lir 

P*akNam*;'13C8PFO&4S(ISr Ma>B<aa}:-507.000/80.000 Da* 

Commant-lOppb LCS ECF- Anno(ath>n: ** 

:ample Index; 106 

I

Sample Nama:'kl10404a020' Sa 

P*ak Name; TFO r Mass(*t): '49930099300 Da,49d.000n0300 Da,499.00tf 130.000 Da' 

Cammant'13nBAnLFC(tllnSynth.Watai* Annotatkm:' 

Sample Type: 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Date; 

Acq. Time: 

Proc. Algorithm: 

Mln. Peak Height 

Min. Peak Hldth: 

BT Window: 

Int . Type: 

Retention Tine: 

Area; 

Height: 

Start Tine ; 

OC 

0.954 

4/6/2011 

3:00:24 

Intelli Q 

0.00 

0.00 

30,0 

15.3 

Valley 

IS.4 

3245 c 

15-3 

15.6 

ng 

AM 

cpa 

poin 

Bin 

Bin 

Bin 

Bin 

mL 

lOA I 1 

& 

3400 

3200 

3000 

2B00 

2600 

2400 

2200 

2000 

1800 

1600 

1400 

1200 

1000 

1S.36 

17.72 

17.0 17.5 

I

SanvlaNam*:*V110«04a029' SampleK):'11 002-20- Flta:'V110404awHr 

PeA Name: TFOS* Uaaa(aa): '49g30IV99300 Da.499.000<80.000 Da,499.00Qn 30300 Da* 

Concentration; 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time: 

Modified: 

Proc. Algorithm: 

Hln. Peak Helghl 

Mln. Peak width; 

Smoothing Width: 

Uae Belativ e RI: 

Int . Type; 

Area; 

Height: 

Stort Tine: 

End Tine: 

1.00 ng/ BL 

1.06 ng/»L 

4/4/2011 

3:44:39 PM 

Ho 

IntelliQua n -

: 0.00 cps 

0.00 sec 

0 poini 

10.0 sec 

15.3 nin 

Ye. 

23040 counts 

i.3Ie.003 cps 

15.3 Bin 

15.5 Bin 

IQA II 

3200 

3000 

260C 

2400 

2200 

S 

SamptoN«me:>1104O4a035' Sample ID:'OLPlOfll-02-14-004- Ffc:'k110404a.w«r 

Peak Name:'PFOS' MMa(e«):'499300^.000 Da,49g.00Q/80300Da,4B9300f130.000 Da' 

Commert;'DALGWMFLMW1001l0322' " - -

nple Type; Unknown 

ncentratlon; H/A 

Iculatad Conc: 0.259 ng/BL 

Proc. Algorithm: IntelliQuar 

Min- Peak Height: 0.00 c 

Mln. Peak Hldth: 0.00 > 

Snoothing Hldth: 0 pc 

BT Window; 10.0 s 

Expected RT: 15.3 n 

Use Belative RT: Yes 

Int. Type: Manual 

Area: 13903 cour 

Height: 1.07et003 c 

Start Time: 15.0 a 

End Tine; IS.5 D 

Sample Index: 

Sample Type: t 

Concentration: 

calculated Conc; 

:. Algorlthn: IntelliQuan -

Peak Height; 0.00 cpg 

Peak Width: O.OD aec 

Retention Time: 

Height; 

Start Time; 

15.3 

1156 c 

2.40e'002 

15.3 

Bin 

S 

i 

i 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:38:28 PM 

Printing Date: Wednesday, May 04, 

Page 4 of 7 

Page 62 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS. and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

Results Name: kll0404a.rdb 

I

Sam(laNama:-k110404a047- Sw[vlalD:-GU>10«1-02-t4-Oir FHa:'k110404a.wir 

Paak Name:-PFOS* Uas*(a*):*499.00a99300Da.499.00(V80300Oa.4993O(V13a000Da' 

Comman(:*DALGWMFLMM)1D011032r Annotation:-

Sample Type; 

Calculated Conc; 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time: 

Modified: 

Proc . AlgorlthB: 

Min, Peak Height 

Hin. Peak Width: 

Uae Relativ e RT: 

Int . Type: 

Area: 

Height: 

End Tine ; 

N / 

0 . 3 

4/5/2 

6:14; 

Y e 

Inte l 

0 . 

1 0 . 

1 5 

Y o l 

Manua 

1 5 

..6Be.' 

1 5 

1 5 

1700 

1600 

1500 

1400 

1300 

1200 

1100 

1000 

900 

800 

700 

600 

500 

400 

300 

200 

100 

13.18 

/W 

15 34 

1 'il U I^ HI 1533 • 

1433 ^^^ H 

16.09 

H i ' l 

1631 

IJLIL 

Pf 

17.1 

lliljili 

Wf 

W7.23 

m }\m 

1739 

A 

I* 

133 133 143 143 153 153 163 18.5 173 

I Samite Name:-kll0404a066- SttnptalD:'GiP1&O1'02-l4-033' Fila:'k110404a.wl<r 

Peak Name: "PFOS* Mass(M):'499.000/99.000 Oa,499.000J8a.000Da,499.00IV130.000 Da' 

I CommenfDAL GWMFL MVTO3D0110323' " - • -

I

SmvliNama:1(11O4O4a054' SamplalD:-GLP1l>«1-02-14-0ir Fla:Id 104O4*.wlfr 

pBANama:*PF05* UaM<*s):'499300)99.000 Da,499.000nO.OOODa.49930af130300 Da* 

Conmant*DALGWMFLMVV010110322* AmoMlon:~ 

Sample Index: 54 

Sanple Type: Unknown 

Concentration: H/A 

Calculated Conc; < 0 

/5/2Q: 

Acq. 8:42:11 I 

ModiCled; 

Proc. Algorlthn : 

Mln. Peak Height 

Mln. Peak Width: 

Snoothing Width: 

Expected RT; 

Use Relativ e BT; 

Int . Type: 

Betentlon Tine: 

Area: 

Height: 

N o 

InteXliQu 

0.00 

0.00 

15.3 

Y e a 

Base To B 

15.4 

958 CO 

.03e.002 

Start Tlse; 

Sample index: 

Sample Type; 

Acq. Date; 

Acq. Tine: 

6 6 

4/5/20H 

12:55:34 

I

Sample Name: 1:1104040071- Sample ID:'GLP1(M)1-02-14-04r Fle:'k110404a.wifr 

Peak Name: 'PFOS* Mas*(«t): *49930<V99300 Oa,49930DJS0.000 Da,4S930W130.000 Da' 

Commant-DALGWMFLMW04D0110323' Annotslion:-

SBBple Index: 71 

Sample Type; Unknown 

Concentration: H/A 540-| 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. 

Acq. Tim. 

1/5/201 

AlgorlthB; IntelllQua 

Peak Height; 0.00 

Peak Width: 0.00 

ng width: 0 f 

13.0 133 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:38:29 PM 

Printing Date: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 

Page 5 of 7 

Page 63 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

Results Name: kll0404a.rdb 

(

SampleName:-kl104O4a0Sr SafnplelO:-LCS-110328>r Fla:-k110404a.wNr 

PMkNan»*:TFOS* MaM<*»):'499300^9300 Da.499.000«0300Da.49930<V130.000 Da' 

Comment*a2p()bLCS* Annotation:' 

Sanple Index: 

Sa-^le Type; 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Tine: 

Modified; 

Proc. Algoritha: 

Hin. Peak Height 

Min. Peak Width: 

Smoothing width: 

Expected RT; 

Dae Relative RT: 

Int- Type: 

Retention Time; 

Area; 

Height: 

End Tine: 

87 

QC 

4/5/2011 

8:19:14 

No 

IntelliQ 

0.00 

0.00 

10.0 

15.3 

Yes 

Valley 

15.4 

.34e*D02 

15.3 

15.5 

I

Sam(JeNBma:'kl1O4O4a093r SamplelD:*LCS-11032a^ Fle:'k1104048.\«k' 

Peak Name: n>FOS- Mass<e«): '499.D00i'99300 Da,499.DDa80.000 Da,499.000/130.000 Da' 

Commant'lOppbLCS' Annotation:-

Sample Type; QC 

I

Sample Name:'k1104D4a09ar Sampta ID: TCS-110328-6* Fle:'k110404a.wKr 

Peak Name: TFOS' Maas(as):-49930(V9d.OOODa,499300JS0300Da.499.000/130.000Da' 

Comment'2ppb LPS' 

Sanple Index: 3 

Height: 

End Tine ; 

2G431 c( 

4.4eet003 

15.3 

4400-

4200-

4000-

3800-

3600-

3400-

3200-

3000-

2200-

2000-

1800' 

1600-

1400-

1200-

lOOO-

, ^ ./V^.^>iM^JfiTlrti»Jktif 

133 133 14.0 143 

,wiw1^iifk.3lBwA^^ 

15.5 163 163 173 

I

SampleName:-k110404alOO^ Saff4]|alD:'LCS-110326-12' F)e;-k110404a.wW 

Peak Name: "PFOS- MaM(e»): '409.000'99.000 Da,499.000ffl0.000 Da ,499300/130.000 Oa" 

Comment'0.2ppb LCS ECF- Amolatton:-

Saaple Index; 100 

Sample Type: QC 

Concentration: 0.200 ng/mL 

Calculated Conc: 0.229 ng/BL 

Acq. Date; 4/6/2011 

Modified: Yes 

Proc. Algorithm; IntelliQua n - IQA II 

Min. Peak Height; 0.00 cps 

Mln. Peak width; 0.00 sac 

Smoothing Width; 0 points 

RT Window; 10.0 aec 

Expected BT: 15.3 Din 

Modified; 

Proc. Algorlthn: 

Min. Peak Height 

Min. Peak Width: 

Smoothing width: 

Expected RT: 

Uae Relative RT; 

Retention Tine: 

No 

IntelliQ 

0.00 

0.00 

15.3 

Yes 

15.4 

Area; 564336 c 

Height: 

End TiBe: 

.0Se*004 

15.6 

an - IQA I 

points 

nin 

nin 

5.0»l 

- 43e4 

3.0*4 

2.0*4 

13*4' 

1.0a4 

50003 

03-

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:38:29 PM 

Printing Date: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 

153 153 163 163 

Page 6 of 7 

Page 64 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS. PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-Kirk Results Name; kll0404a.rdb 

I

Sampl*Nsme:-kl10404a103' 5ampl*ID:-LCS-11032S-1S* Fla:"kl 10404a.«tfr 

Paak Nama: "PFOS* Maw<*»): *499.000.r99.000 Da,499.000/80.000 Da.499.00(V130.000 Da* 

Commwri:'2ppbLC3ECF' Anootaaon:" 

FlB:Tc110404a.«*r 

,000 Da,49930(V130.000 Da' 

Sanple Index; 

SaBple Type: 

Concentration; 

Calculated Conc 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time; 

Proc. AlgorlthB 

Mln. Peak Heigh 

Kin. Peak width 

SBOOthlng width 

Expected BT: 

Int. Type; 

Retention Time: 

Area: 

Height; 

Start Tine: 

103 

QC 

2.00 

2.63 

4/6/2011 

1;57:0T 

ng/nL 

* 

IntelliQuan -

0.00 

0.00 

0 

10.0 

15.3 

Yes 

Manual 

15.4 

)25B8 c 

).76e.003 

15.0 

15.6 

cps 

poin 

sec 

Bin 

IQA II 

8000 

6000 

550(1 

5«K, 

Sample Nama: 'k110404a10e' Sample ID: tCS-110328-18" 

Paak Nama: TFOS' Mau(*t>:'499300/99.000 Da.499.000no. 

Comment'tOppbLCSECr Annotation:-* 

mple Index; 106 

IQuan - IQA II 

4J!e4-

4.0e4-

33*4-

33*4-

2.6e4' 

2.4*4-

2.2*4-

Z0e4 

1.2*4-

1.0*4-

80003-

60003-

40003-

20003-

1 

133 133 143 143 153 153 163 163 173 173 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:38:29 PM 

Printing Date: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 

Page 7 of 7 

Page 65 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

/Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI IVIoms Fann Landfill - MAsdh 2011 

•ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0404a.rdb 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:39:09 PM 

Page 1 of 1 

Page 66 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS. PFHS. and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0404a.rdb 

I

SamplaName:'ync11O4O4a020'- Sample ID:-10007-32-09- Fie: "mcl 10«04a.wlfr 

P*ak Name:'13C8PFO&IS(ISr Mass(*s>: •507.000«)300 Da' 

Comment'23 ndftnLFCatdhSvfllh.Watac' Annotetton:-

Sample Index; 20 

Sample Type: Standard 

Concentration; 0.960 ng/aL 

Acq. Date; 4/4/2011 

Acq. TlBe: 8:54:50 PM 

Hodified: Tes 

Proc- AlgorlthB: Specify Parameters - HQ li t 

Noise Percentage; 50 

I

Samp4aNama:-mc11O4O4a02r Safi¥tolO:"llO02-20r Fia;'mc11CM04a.wtr 

Peak Nama:'13C8PFOS-t5(l5)r MaM<as):-507300/80300 Da* 

Commant-Method Btanl^ Anrwtatnn:'-

Peak-Split. Factor; 2 

Kin. Peak Height; 0 

Kin. Peak 1 Idth: 0 

Saoothlng Width: 3 

Expected SI 

Use Relati v 

Int . Type; 

Retention T 

Area; 

Height: 

End Tine : 

e RT: Ho 

IBB ; 13.1 

30236 e 

HOt*0 0 

13.2 

0 0 

B i n 

ounts 

c p s 

n i n 

I

SampiBNam«:-mc11^k404a035' Sample ID:'GU>1(M)1-02-1443V- Fla:-mc1l0404a.»«tr 

P«ak Name: '13C8PFOS4&0S)' M3ss(e*): -507.000/80.000 DaComment "DAL GWMFL MVV040110323' Annotation:-* 

sample Index; 35 

Sample Type: Unknown 

Concentration: 0.960 ng/oL 

Calculated Conc: N/A 

Acq. Date: 4/4/2011 

Acq. Tine ; 11:59:46 PH 

Modified; Ho 

Proc. Algoritha ; Specify Para* 

Base. Sub. Hlndou; 1.00 B 

Paak-Split. Factor: 2 

Report Largest Peak: Yea 

Mln. Peah Height; 0.00 

Hln. Peah Hldth: 0.00 

Saoothlng Hldth: 3 

RT Window: 30.0 sec 

Expected RT; 13.1 nin 

Use Belativ e RT: No 

Int . Type; Base To Baae 

Retention Time: 13.0 mln 

Area: 44581 coents 

Height; l.lle.00 4 cps 

Start Time: 12.9 aln 

End TiBe: 13.2 al n 

in 

poin 

- MQ II 

1.10*4 

1.0S*4 

1J00*4 

9500.00 

9000.00 

6500.00 

8000 J » 

7500.00 

7000 J » 

6500.00 

g 6000.00 

#5500.00 

1 5000.00 

4500.00 

4000.00 

3500.00 

3000.00 

2500.00 

2000.00 

1500.00 

1000.00 

500.00 

11.0 15.0 153 

I

SamptBNamK-mc1104D4a044' Sttt^leID:TCS-110328-1' Fle:-inc110404a.wlfr' 

Peak Name:'13C8F70S-IS(ISr Maaa(ttt): *507JXNV80.000 Da' 

Comment '2ppb LCS' Annolalion: ~ 

Sample Index; 44 

Saaple Type: QC 

Concentration; 0.951 ng/raL 

Calculated Conc: H/A 7000 

Acq. Date; 4/5/2011 

Saa p 

Cal c 

Acq . 

e Typ e Unkno w 

late d Conc : 

Date : 

Time : 

Modified : 

Hol s 

Bas e 

Pea k 

Perc e 

Sub , 

Split . 

2 

0 <16 

N / A 

03: 0 

Y ^ a 

Repor t Larges t Pe a 

Mln . 

RT H 

Pea k Height ; 

Pea k Hldth ; 

Expecte d RT 

5 

2 

1 3 . 

9.6aet003 cps 

Proc. Alg 

Noise Per 

Peak-Spli 

Report La 

Min. Peah 

Mln. Peah 

Snoothing 

Expected 

Uae Rele t 

int . Type 

Height: 

ITltha : 

Hindoo 

Specify PaiBBeters 

50 

gest Peak: le a 

Height: 

Hldth: 

ve RT: 

0.00 cps . 

3 point 

30.0 se c 

13.1 mln 

No 

Valley 

1 2ee*003 cps 

- MO III 

Start Tloe ; 

15.0 15^ 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:41:05 PM 

Page 1 of 4 

Page 67 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0404a.rdb 

I

WipiaHMiM:-mc1ia4a4a04r Sampla ID:-LCS-1 

P*ak Nama:'13C8PFOS-IS{ISr Manfas):'507.000/801)00 Da* 

Comiett-IOppfaLCS' Annotation:*' I

SanviaNama:'mcll0404a053- Sanr()lalD:TCS-110328-ir FVe:-mcl 104O4a.wKr 

PaANama:>13C8PFOS4S(ISr Masa(ai): •507J}OOreO.OOO Da' 

Convnent *2ppb LCS ECF- Annotalkn:" 

Saaple Index: 53 

Saaple Type; OC 

Concentration: 0.952 ng/nL 

Calculated Conc; H/A 

Basa. Sub. Hindow: 

Peak-Split. Factor; 

Report Largest Peah; 

Kin. Peah Height: 

Hln. Peah Hldth: 

10328-r Fla:-nKt10404a.w«r 

conc 

Calc 

Acq. 

Acq. 

Modi 

Proc 

Hois 

Baae 

Peak 

late d 

Time: 

led; 

Algor 

r"nr0 . 

OC 

54 

4/5/201 

„ Spec 

[indow: 

Report Largest P 

Peak E 

RT H 

Expe 

U s e 

Int . 

ndo«: 

ted RT 

elatl v 

Type: 

tio n T 

dth; 

dth : 

e RT; 

a e ; 

a k ; 

30 

He 

V a l 

1 

« J 

t l 

1 . 

7 

0 

0 

1 

n 

e y 

. 0 

ng/BL 

AM 

Peremeter 

0 Bin 

00 cps 

00 sec 

a e c 

n i n 

n i n 

1.25*4 

1.20*4 

1.15*4 

1.10*4 

1J)5*4 

1JXM 

9500 J» 

wxao 

8500 J)0 

8000X10 

7500X)0 

• 7000X>0 

1 6000.00 

~ 55O0J» 

5000^ 

4500 ^ 

4000.00 

3500.00 

3000^ 

2500IIO 

2000 ^ 

1500^ 

1000^ 

500.00 

0.00 

13 .05 

L 

14.99 

ujyr"-" 

f l 

n 

14.79J ^7,u 

I Samp«eMam*:1mc110404a056' Samp4eID:-LCS-110328-16- Fito:"mc110404a.wtfl' 

P«ak Name:-13C8PFOS-tS(ISr Mat*(et):'S07.O0a/80JXXI Da* 

I Commant'lOppbLCS ECP Annotation:'' 

Expected RT: 

Int . Type; 

Retention T 

Height: 

Start Time 

ime: 

Valley 

6.02e*003 

13.0 

m l n 

c p s 

6000 

5800 

5600 

5400 

5200 

SOOO 

4800 

4600 

4400 

4200 

4000 

3800 

3600 

3400 

3200 

3000 

2800 

2600 

2400 

2200 

2000 

1800 

1600 

1400 

1200 

1000 

800 

600 

400 

200 

^ 

1 

M.>5l»jM 

II'"'" 

f [1(-15. I " 

1 

1 

,? 14.79 

"•'¥ / 

...A/ , 

LM 

11.0 4,5 15.0 15.5 

I

SampleName:*mcl104D4a020' Sample b:'100o!^-3^-09' Flla:*mcll0404a.««nr 

Peak Nome: *PFOS' Maas<**}: '499,Oa(V80.000 Da.499.000/99J]00 Da,4e9.000/130JX)0 Da' 

Comment-2.5 ngAnL FC ttd in S>nth. Watw* AnnoCatkvi:-

Sample Index; 20 

Sample Type; Standard 

Concentration: 2.50 ng/mL 2.2*4-

Calculated Conc; 2.43 ng/mL 

Acq. Date; 4/4/2011 

Acq. Time: 8:54:50 PM il*« -

2.0*4' 

Sample Type: 

Concentration; 

Calculated Conc: 

Acq. Date; 

Hodified: Tes 

Proc. Algorithm: Specify ParaBetecs 

Holse Percentage ; 50 

Peak-Spli 

gest Pe 

Height: 

Width: 

Smoothing Width: 

RT Hlndou: 

Die Relativ e RT; 

Int . Type 

Area; 

Height; 

Start TlB 

V... 

Ho 

0 

3 

Valley 

.23e»00 

12.9 

1.20*4-

1.15*4-

1.10*4-

1.05*4-

1.00*4-

9500^-

9OO0J»-

B5O0JW8000IIO7500 J»-

7000,00-

ff 6500,00-

seooojM-

^ 5500,00-

5000.00-

4500^ -

4000.00-

zsoaxa3000 JX)' 

2500,00-

2000J)0' 

1500.00' 

1000OT500.00-

0.00-

Modified: Y B 

Proc. Algorlthn : Specify 

Moise Per 

Baae. Sub 

Peak-Spli 

Min. Peak 

Min. Peak 

Smoothing 

entage : 

WindOK: 

. Factor 

Height: 

Width: 

Width: 

Expected RT: 

Ose Relat 

Int . Type 

Aree: 

Height! 

ve RT: 

Time; ^^ 

3 0 

1 

3 

0 

. 1 

Y e s 

f a n 

2.22e 

a l 

0 0 c p a 

p o 

1.4*4 

' 1.0*4 

eoooj) 

8000J) 

7000.0 

8000.0' 

5000.0' 

4000.0' 

3000.0' 

2000J}' 

lOOOJ)' 

OJ)' -*. 

^.t./t^j^f"^ ^^-^y.^ 

145 15i) 15J 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:41:05 PM 

Page 2 of 4 

Page 68 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS. and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcll0404a.rd b 

I

Wp)aNam*:-mc110404a02g- Samfia U): *11002O0* Fl«:'mc110404a.wlflPaak Nwna: "PFOS* Maas(*t}: '499.OOIV80.000 Da.499.00a99.000 Da,499.00ari 30.000 Da' 

Canmant: *Method Blank* ArwrataSon:' 

Sample Type: Unknown 

concentration : N/A 1250-

Calculated Conc; 0.0226 ng/mL 

Acq. [>ate: 4/4/2011 1200-

Acq. Time; 11:59:46 PH 

1150' 

Hodified; Ho 

Proc. AlgorlthB: Specify Paraaeters - HO li t 1100-

Holsa Paccantage; 50 

Base. Sub. Window; 1.00 Bin 

Peak-Split. Factor; 2 

Report Largest Peak: Tes 

Hln. Peak Height: 0.00 cps 

Mln. Peak Width: 0.00 aec 

Saoothlng Width: 3 points 

RT Window;' 30.0 sec 

Expected RT: 13.1 Bin 

Use Relativ e RT; Tea 

Int . Type: Valley 

Retention Tiae : 13.1 Bin 

Area: 3986 counts 

Height: ».3eet002 cps 

SarT¥'aNama:-mc1104a4a035' Sam(:telD:'GLP10-01-02-14-037- F>*:-mc110404a.wtr 

Paak Nwna: TFOS' Masatas): *499X)0(V80.000 Da.499.000/99J)00 Da.499.00(V130.000 Da' 

Commant'DALQWMFLMW04ai10323' AnnotaUon:-

I Sampt*NamK-mc110404a044' Samplab:-LCS-110328-4* Fla:*mc110404a,wftr 

Paak Mama:-PFOS- Ma«stM):'499.000/8a000Oa,499.O0ajS9.D00Da,490.00Qf130.000Da' 

I Comment -2ppb LCS* /Annotation: ~ 

Sample Type: 

Calculated Conc 

Acq. Time: 

Modified; 

Proc. Algoritha 

Noise Percentag 

Baae. Sub. Hind 

Peak-Split. Fac 

Report Largest 

Hin. Peak Heigh 

Mln. Peak Hldth 

SBOOthlng Hldth 

BT Window: 

Expected RT: 

Use Relative RT 

Int. Type: 

Area: 1 

Height: 

Start Tiae: 

End Time; 

Unknown 

22.0 ng 

2:03:05 AM 

Ves 

Specify Paraa 

: 50 

w: 1.00 B 

or: 2 

eak; Yes 

0.00 

3 

30.0 sec 

13.1 Bin 

Ves 

Manual 

40637 counts 

t.33e*005 cps 

12.6 Bin 

13.4 mln 

San:>pteNamK'Wl10404a04r SanrvietD:-LCS-il032S-V' #^ ; Wll0404a.wHr 

Paak Name: "PFOS* M«ts(e»): '499,000/80.000 Da,499.000/99J>00 D«.499.000/l30.000 Da' 

Commant'lOppbLCS* Annotalfcin:~ 

Sample Index: 

Calculated Conc; 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. TlBe: 

Hodifl«d: 

Proc. Algoritha: 

Noise Percentage 

44 

OC 

4/5/2011 

5:08:03 AM 

No 

50 

Paak-Split. Factor; 2 

Report Largest P 

Mln. Peak Height 

Hln. Peak Hldth: 

SBOOthlng Hldth; 

RT Window: 

Expected RT; 

Use Retatiie RT; 

Int. Type: 

Retention Time: 

Area: 

Height: 

End Tine: 

ak: Ves 

0.00 cpa 

0.00 sac 

30.0 aec 

13.1 nin 

Tes 

Valley 

7 964 counts 

13.2 aln 

Concentration: 

Calculated Conc 

Acq. Date: 

Acq. Time: 

Hodified; 

PIOC . AlgorlthB 

Holse Percentag 

1 

4/5/ 

6:09 

H 

Spec 

Peak-Split, rector: 

Report Largest 

Hln. Peah Heigh 

Hln. Peah width 

BT Window: 

Expected RT; 

Use Relative RT 

Int. Type: 

Height: 

eak; 

30 

l 

t t 

Val 

1 

39543 

1.75e 

OC 

on 43 Al 

tv P 

7 

Yea 

ng/BL 

ng/nL 

3 

It 

' 

1 

005 

mln 

cps 

1.7*5 

1.6*5 

1.5aS 

lv**5 

1J*5 

1.2*5 

1.1*5 

1J)a5 

0.0*4 

8J}*4 

7,0*4 

6.0*4 

5Xt*4 

4.0M 

3J>*4 

2J>*4 

1.0*4 

13.05 

I 

Data printe d by STW 

Printin g Time: 2:41:0 5 PM 

^*~'*' Page 3 of 4 

Page 69 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

*ETS-McCoy Results Name: mcllO404a.rdb 

T

SampliNama:-mcl10404aa5r SartvtolD:*LCS>1103ZS-13' Flla:tncl1(Wo4a.w«r 

Paak Name: *PFOS* Uass(**):'499.00Q/80JM0 Oa.499J)00f99X00 Da,499JXNVl 30X00 DaComment:-2p(^ LCS ECF* Afwnlation: " 

Sanpla Index: 53 

Saaple Type: QC 

Concentration: 2.00 ng/BL 

Calculated Conc; 2.4B ng/aL 

Acq. Date: 4/5/2011 

Acq. Tine; B;13:06 AH 

Proc. Algo 

Noise Pat. 

Base, sub 

Peak-Spli 

rltha; 

Window 

Report Largest p. 

Hin. Peak 

Min. Peak Kldth; 

«ldth: 

Expected RT: 

Uae Eelatl 

Retention 

Area; 

Height; 

ve RT; 

Specify Pa 

50 

: 1.00 

0.00 

0.00 

13.1 

Yes 

Manual 

13.0 

76696 cou 

I .12et004 

I

W^Nama: 

pMikNama:T 

Comment'10i 

-me110404a056- S8nviBlD:'LCS-110328-16* F)K-mc11O404a.wir 

"PFOS' M«ss(*s):'499X00180.000 Da>99JXia99X0OD«.499XOa/130j00O Da' 

lOppbLCSECF- Annotation:-

Concentration: 10.0 

Calculated Conc: 11.5 

Acq, Date: 4/5/2011 

Acq. Tine: S;14:46 AJ 

Proc. Algorithm; Specify P 

Peak-Split. Factor; 2 

Report Largest Peak: Yes 

Hin. Peak Height; 0.0 

Smoothing Width: 3 

Use Belative RT: lea 

Int. Type; Manual 

Retention Tine: 13.0 

Area: 711919 oo 

Height; l.lOetOOS 

End Tine; 13,2 

ng/mL 

ng/BL 

raaeters - MQ 

Bin 

points 

cps 

III 

i 

i 

1 

1.10*5i 

850*4 

9 M » • 

7.00*4-

6X0*4-

5.50*4: 

5X0*4-

4.50*4; 

4X0*4-

3.50*4 

3X0*4 

2iOM 

2X0M 

1,50*4 

1X0*4: 

5000.00-^ 

Data printed by STW 

Printing Time: 2:41:05 PM 

Page 4 o f 4 

Page 70 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

ATTACHMENT C: ANALYTICAL METHOD 

Page 71 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS In Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

EnvifDnmenial Laboiaioiy 

Method 

Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water 

by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection Analysis 

Method Number: ETS-8-044.0 

Adoption Date: Upon Signing 

Effective Date: Q <///? f o "f 

Approved By: 

^/^j/o y 

William K. Reagen, Laboratory Manager Date 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 1 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct 

Injection Analysis Page 72 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

1 Scope and Application 

This method is to be used to quantify Perfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA), Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA), 

PerfluorohexanoicAcid (PFHA), Perfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA), Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA), 

PerfluorononanoicAcid (PFNA), Perfiuorodecanoic Acid (PFDA), Perfluoroundecanoic Acid (PFUnA), 

Perfluorododecanoic Acid (PFDoA), Perfluorobutanesulfonate (PFBS), Perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHS), 

and Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) by High Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to a tandem 

Mass Spectrometric Detector (LC/MS/MS) in clean water samples. Water samples containing heavy 

particulate may require preparation by an altemate method such as ETS-8-154 "Detennination of 

Perfluorinated Acids, Alcohols, Amides, and Sulfonates In Water By Solid Phase Extraction and High 

Performance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry". 

This method is considered a performance-based method. Data is considered acceptable as long as the 

defined QC elements are satisfied. 

Sample collection is not covered under this analytical procedure. 

2 Method Summary 

Clean aqueous samples are analyzed by direct injection using LC/MS/MS. Samples containing heavy 

particulate may not be suitable for analysis by this method. Samples containing suspended particulate 

should be centrifuge prior to removing a sample aliquot, or filtered. 

This is a perfomiance-based method. Method accuracy is detemiined for each sample set using multiple 

laboratory control spikes at multiple concentrations. This method also requires that the precision and 

accuracy for each sample be detemiined using field matrix spikes to verify that the method is applicable to 

each sample matrix. Sample results for spikes outside of 70% to 130%, may be flagged as such (with 

expanded accuracy statements), or will not be reported due to non-compliant quality control samples. 

Fortification levels for field matrix spikes and for laboratory matrix spikes should be at least 50% of the 

endogenous level and less than 10 times the endogenous level to be used to detemnine the statement of 

accuracy for anaiyticai results. 

3 Definitions 

3.1 Calibration Standard 

A solution prepared by spiking a known volume of the Working Standard (WS) into a predetermined 

amount of ASTM Type I, HPLC grade water, or other suitable water, and analyzed according to this 

method. Calibration standards are used to calibrate the instrument response with respect to analyte 

concentration. 

3.2 Laboratory Duplicate Sample (LDS, or Lab Dup) 

A laboratory duplicate sample is a separate aliquot of a sample taken in the analytical laboratory that is 

analyzed separately with identical procedures. Analysis of LDSs compared to that of the first aliquot give 

a measure of the precision associated with laboratory procedures, but not with sample collection, 

preservation, or storage procedures. 

3.3 Field Blank (FB)/Trip Blank 

ASTM Type I, HPLC grade water, or other suitable water, placed in a sample container in the laboratory 

and treated as a sample in all respects, including exposure to sampling site conditions, storage, 

preservation and all analytical procedures. The purpose of the FB is to determine if test substances or 

other interferences are present in the field environment. This sample is also refen-ed to as a Trip Blank. 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 2 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct 

Injection Analysis 

Page 73 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

3.4 Field Duplicate Sample (FDS, Field Dup) 

A sample collected in duplicate at the same time from the same location as the sample. The FDS is 

handled under identical circumstances and treated exactly the same throughout field and laboratory 

procedures. Analysis of the FDS compared to that of the first sample gives a measure of the precision 

associated with sample collection, preservation and storage, as well as with laboratory procedures. 

3.5 Field Matrix Spike (FMS) 

A sample to which known quantities of the target analytes are added to the sample bottle in the laboratory 

before the bottles are sent to the field for collection of aqueous samples. A known, specific volume of 

sample must be added to the sample container without rinsing. This may be accomplished by making a 

"fill to this level" line on the outside of the sample container. The FMS should be spiked between 

approximately 50% and 10 times the expected analyte concentration in the sample. If the expected range 

of analyte concentrations is unknown, multiple spikes at varying levels may be prepared to increase the 

likelihood that a spike at an appropriate level is made. The FMS is analyzed to ascertain if any matrix 

effects, interferences, or stability issues may complicate the interpretation of the sample analysis. 

3.6 Trip Blank Spike (Field Spike Control Sample, FSCS) 

An aliquot of ASTM Type I, HPLC grade water, or other suitable water, to which known quantities of the 

target analytes are added in the laboratory prior to the shipment of the collection bottles. The FSCS is 

extracted and analyzed exactly like a study sample to help detemiine if the method is in control and 

whether a loss of analyte could be attributed to holding time, sample storage and/or shipment issues. A 

low and high FSCS are appropriate when expected sample concentrations are not known or may vary. At 

least one separate, un-spiked sample must be taken at the same time and place as each FMS. 

3.7 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 

An aliquot of control matrix to which known quantities of the target analytes are added in the laboratory at 

the time of sample extraction. At least two levels are included, one generally at the low end of the 

calibration curve and one near the mid to upper range of the curve. The LCSs are extracted and analyzed 

exactly like a laboratory sample to determine whether the method is in control. LCSs should be prepared 

each day samples are extracted. 

3.8 Laboratory Matrix Spike (LMS) 

A laboratory matrix spike is an aliquot of a sample to which known quantities of target analytes are added 

in the laboratory. The LMS is analyzed exactly like a laboratory sample to detemiine whether the sample 

matrix contributes bias to the analytical results. The endogenous concentrations of the analytes in the 

sample matrix must be determined in a separate aliquot and the measured values in the LMS corrected 

for these concentrations. LMSs are optional for analysis of aqueous samples. 

3.9 Laboratory Sample 

A portion or aliquot of a sample received from the field for testing. 

3.10 Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) 

The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for a dataset is the lowest concentration that can be reliably 

quantitated within the specified limits of precision and accuracy during routine operating conditions. To 

simplify data reporting, the LLOQ is generally selected as the lowest non-zero standard in the calibration 

curve that meets method criteria. Sample LLOQs are matrix-dependent. 

The upper limit of quantitation (ULOQ) for a dataset is the highest concentration that can be reliably 

quantitated within the specified limits of precision and accuracy during routine operating conditions. The 

highest standard in the calibration curve that meets method criteria is defined as the ULOQ. 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 3 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct 

Injection Analysis 

Page 74 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; /Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

3.11 Method Blank 

An aliquot of control matrix that is treated exactly like a laboratory sample including exposure to all 

glassware, equipment, solvents, and reagents that are used with other laboratory samples. The method 

blank is used to determine if test substances or other interferences are present in the laboratory 

environment, the reagents, or the apparatus. 

3.12 Sample 

A sample is an aliquot removed from a larger quantity of material intended to represent the original source 

material. 

3.13 Stock Standard Solution (SSS) 

A concentrated solution of a single-analyte prepared in the laboratory with an assayed reference 

compound. 

3.14 Surrogate 

A compound similar in chemical composition and behavior to the target analyte(s), but is not nomially 

found in the sample(s). A sun'ogate compound is typically a target analyte with at least one atom 

containing an isotopically-labeled substitution. If used, sun-ogate(s) are added to all samples and quality 

control samples. Sun'ogate(s) are added to quantitatively evaluate the entire analytical procedure 

including sample collection, preparation, and analysis. Inclusion of a sun'ogate analyte is an optional 

quality control measure and is NOT required. 

3.15 Working Standard (WS) 

A solution of several analytes prepared in the laboratory from SSSs and diluted as needed to prepare 

calibration standards and other required analyte solutions. 

4 Warnings and Cautions 

4.1 Health and Safety 

The acute and chronic toxicity of the standards for this method have not been precisely determined; 

however, each should be treated as a potential health hazard. The analyst should wear gloves, a lab 

coat, and safety glasses to prevent exposure to chemicals that might be present. 

The laboratory is responsible for maintaining a safe wori< environment and a current awareness of local 

regulations regarding the handling of the chemicals used in this method. A reference file of material safety 

data sheets (MSDS) should be available to all personnel involved in these analyses. 

4.2 Cautions 

The analyst must be femiliar with the laboratory equipment and potential hazards including, but not limited 

to, the use of solvents, pressurized gas and solvent lines, high voltage, and vacuum systems. Refer to the 

appropriate equipment procedure or operator manual for additional infomiation and cautions. 

5 Interferences 

During sample preparation and analysis, major potential contaminant sources are reagents and 

glassware. All materials used in the analyses shall be demonstrated to be free from interferences under 

conditions of analysis by mnning method blanks. 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 4 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct 

Injection Analysis 

Page 75 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Moms Farm Landfill - MAsch 2011 

Parts and supplies that contain Teflon® should be avoided or minimized due to the possibility of 

interference and/or contamination. These may include, but are not limited to: wash bottles. Teflon® lined 

caps, autovial caps, HPLC parts, etc. 

The use of disposable micropipettes or pipettes to aliquot standard solutions is recommended to make 

calibration standards and matrix spikes. 

6 Instrumentation, Supplies, and Equipment 

6.1 Instrumentation and Equipment 

A high performance liquid chromatograph capable of pumping up to two solvents and equipped with a 

variable volume injector capable of injecting 5-100 pL connected to a tandem Mass Spectrometer 

(LC/MS/MS). I 

Analytical balance capable of reading to 0.0001 g 

A device to collect raw data for peak integration and quantitation 

15-mL and 50-mL disposable polypropylene centrifuge tubes. 

Gas tight syringes, 25|JL, 50|JL, 100|JL, 250ML, SOOpL, 1000|JL. 

1 mL plastic HPLC autovial. 

Disposable pipettes, polypropylene or glass as appropriate 

Centrifuge capable of spinning 15-mL and 50-mL polypropylene tubes at 3000 rpm. 

6.2 Chromatographic System 

Guard Column: Prism RP, 4.6 mm x 50 mm, 5 pm 

Analytical Column: Betasil CI8,4.6 mm x 100 mm, 5 pm 

Temperature: 10°C 

Mobile Phase (A): 2 mM Ammonium Acetate in Water 

Mobile Phase (B): Methanol 

Gradient Program: 

Time (min) 

0.0 

0.5 

11.0 

13.5 

13.6 

17.0 

%A 

97 

97 

5 

5 

97 

97 

%B 

3 

3 

95 

95 

3 

3 

Flow Rate 

(mL/min) 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

1.0 

Injection Volume: 100 pL. 

Quantitation: Peak Area - quadratic curve fit, 1/x weighted. 

Run Time: ~ 17 minutes. 

The previous information is intended as a guide; alternate conditions and equipment may be used 

provided that data quality objectives are met. 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 5 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Detennination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct 

Injection Analysis 

Page 76 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

6.3 MS/MS System 

6.3.1 Mode: Electrospray Negative bn, MRM mode, monitoring the following transitions: 

Analyte 

PFBA 

PFPeA 

PFHA 

PFHpA 

PFOA 

PFNA 

PFDA 

PFUnA 

PFDoA 

PFBS 

PFHS 

PFOS 

Transition Monitored 

213^169 

263^219 

313 ^ 269 and 313-> 119 

363 ^ 319, 363 ^ 169 and 363 ^119 

413 -^ 369, 413 -¥ 219 and 413 -^ 169 

463 ^ 419, 463 -^ 169 and 463 ^219 

513 ^ 469, 513 ^ 219 and 513 ^ 269 

563 ^ 519, 563 -» 269 and 563 -^219 

613 ^ 569, 613 ^ 169 and 613 -> 319 

299 ^ 80 and 299 ^ 99 

399 -> 80 and 399 -» 99 

499 -> 80, 499 -» 99 and 499 -^ 130 

Multiple transitions for monitoring the analytes is an option, as summing multiple transitions may provide 

quantitation of isomers that more closely matches NMR data and may have the added benefit of 

increased sensitivity. The use of one daughter ion is acceptable if method sensitivity is achieved, 

provided that retention time criteria are met to assure adequate specificity. 

The previous information is intended as a guide, altemate instalments and equipment may be used. 

7 Reagents and Standards 

7.1 Chemicals 

Water- Milli-Q, HPLC grade, or other suitably appropriate sources 

Methanol - HPLC grade 

Ammonium Acetate -A.C.S. Reagent Grade 

7.2 Standards 

Perfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA - C4 acid); Oakwood Products, Inc 

Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA - C5 acid, also known as NFPA, nonafluoropentanoic acid); Alfa Aesar 

PerfluorohexanoicAcid (PFHA-C6 acid); Oakwood Products, Inc 

Perfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA - C7 acid, also known as TDHA, tridecafluoroheptanoic acid); Oakwood 

Products, Inc 

Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA - C8 acid); 3M 

PerfluorononanoicAcid (PFNA-C9 acid); Oakwood Products, Inc 

Perfiuorodecanoic Acid (PFDA-CIO acid); Oakwood Products, Inc 

Perfluoroundecanoic Acid (PFUnA-C11 acid); Oakwood Products, Inc 

Perfluorododecanoic Acid (PFDoA-C12 acid); Oakwood Products, Inc 

Perfluorobutanesulfonate (PFBS - C4 sulfonate); 3M 

Perfluorohexanesulfonate (PFHS - C6 sulfonate); 3M 

Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS - C8 sulfonate); 3M 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 6 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection 

Analysis 

Page 77 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

The previous information is intended as a guide. Reagents and standards from alternate sources may be 

used. 

7.3 Reagent Preparation 

2 mM Ammonium acetate solution (Analysis)—^Weigh 0.3 g of Ammonium acetate and dissolve in 2.0 L of reagent 

water. 

Note: Alternative volumes may be prepared as long as the ratios of the solvent to solute ratios are maintained. 

7.4 Stock Standard Solution (SSS) and Working Standard Solution Preparation 

The following standard preparation procedure serves as an example. Weighed amounts and final volumes may be 

changed to suit the needs of a particular study. For example, |JL volumes may be spiked into volumetric flasks 

when diluting stock solutions to appropriate levels. 

100 (jg/mL target analyte SSSs—Weigh out 10 mg of analytical standard (corrected for percent salt and 

purity) and dilute to 10OmL with methanol or other suitable solvent, in a 10OmL volumetric flask. Transfer to a 

125mL LDPE bottle or other suitable container. Prepare a separate solution for each analyte. Expiration dates 

and storage conditions of stock solutions should be assigned in accordance with laboratory standard operating 

procedure. An example of purity and salt con-ection is given below for PFOS. 

,. X- f X molecular weight of anion 

salt correction factor = 

moclecular weight of salt 

4QQ PFOS (K^ )salt correction factor = ^^ ^ = 0.9275 

538 

10 mg CsFiySOs K" with purity 90% = 8.35mg CsFuSOs" (10 mg*0.90*0.9275=8.35 mg) 

5 Mg/mL (5000 ng/mL) mixed working standard—Add 0.5mL each of the lOOjjg/mL SSSs to a lOmL volumetric 

flask and bring up to volume with solvent. 

250 ng/mL mixed working standard—Add 1.25mL of the 5 [Jig/mL -mixed wori<ing standard solution to a 25mL 

volumetric flask and bring up to volume with solvent. 

125 ng/mL mixed standard—Add 625|jL of the 5 pg/mL-mixed worthing standard solution to a 25mL volumetric 

flask and bring up to volume with solvent. 

Storage Conditions—Store all SSSs and working standards in accordance with laboratory standard operating 

procedure or in a refrigerator at 4°±2°C for a maximum period of 6 months from the date of preparation. 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 7 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection 

Analysis 

Page 78 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

7.5 Calibration Standards 

Using the wori<ing standards described above, prepare calibration solutions in ASTM Type I water, HPLC water, or 

other suitable water, using the following table as a guideline. Note: Volumes of water and worthing standards may 

be adjusted to meet the data quality objectives addressed in the general project outline. Calibration levels other 

than those listed below can be prepared as needed. 

Concentration 

of WS, ng/mL 

125 

125 

125 

125 

250 

250 

250 

250 

5000 

5000 

5000 

Volume of WS,fd. 

10 

15 

20 

30 

20 

50 

100 

200 

25 

50 

100 

Final Volume of 

Calibration Standard (mL 

of ASTM Type 1 Water, or 

otiter suitable water) 

50 

50 

50 

50 

50 

50 

50 

50 

50 

50 

50 

Final Concentration of 

Calibration Standard, ng/mL 

(ppb) in ASTM Type 1 Water, 

or other suitable water 

0.025 

0.0375 

0.050 

0.075 

0.100 

0.250 

0.500 

1.00 

2.50 

5.00 

10.0 

8 Sample Handling 

8.1 Water Sample Preparation 

This method is applicable to clean water samples. Samples containing heavy particulate may not be suitable for 

analysis by this method. Samples containing suspended particulate should be centrifuge prior to removing a 

sample aliquot, or filtered. 

Thoroughly mix sample before removing an aliquot and placing in a labeled plastic autovial. Plastic is 

prefen'ed over the use of glass autovials, to prevent the possibly of fluorochemical sticking to the glass. 

Dilute sample, if necessary, with ASTM Type I, HPLC water, or other suitable water. 

Prepare method QC samples and multiple method blanks and aliquot into labeled plastic autovials. 

Prepare at least five method blanks. 

9 Sample Analysis - LC/MS/MS 

Analyze the standard curve prior to each set of samples. The standard curve may be plotted using a linear fit, 

weighted 1/x or unweighted, or by quadratic fil (y = ax^ •^ bx •^ c), weighted 1/x or unweighted, using suitable 

software. The calibration curves may include but should not be forced through zero. The mathematical method 

used to calculate the calibration curve should be applied consistently throughout a study. Any change should be 

thoroughly documented in the raw data. 

High and/or low points may be excluded from the calibration curves to provide a better fit over the range 

appropriate to the data or because they did not meet the pre-determined acceptance criteria. Low-level curve 

points should also be excluded if their area counts are not at least twice that of the method and/or solvent blanks. 

The coefficient of detennination (r^) value for the calibration curve must be greater than or equal to 0.990. Each 

point in the curve must be within ±25% of the theoretical concentration with the exception of the LLOQ, which may 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 8 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Detennination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection 

Analysis 

Page 79 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

be within ±30%. Justification for exclusion of calibration curve points will be noted in the raw data. A minimum of 6 

points will be used to constmct the calibration curve. 

If the calibration curve does not meet acceptance criteria, perform routine maintenance or prepare a new standard 

curve (if necessary) and reanalyze. 

Continuing calibration verifications (CCV) are analyzed to verify the accuracy of the calibration curve. Analyze a 

mid-range calibration standard, one of the same standards used to constmct the calibration curve, at a minimum 

after every tenth sample, not including solvent blanks, with a minimum of one per sample set. Calibration 

verification injections must be within ±25% to be considered acceptable. The calibration curve and the last passing 

CCV will then bracket acceptable samples. Multiple CCV levels may be used. 

Samples containing analytes that are quantitated above the concentration of the highest standard in the 

curve should be further diluted and reanalyzed. 

10 Quality Control 

10.1 Data Quality Objectives 

This method and required quality control samples is designed to generate data accurate to ±30% with a targeted 

LOQ of 0.025 ng/mL. Any deviations from the quality control measures spelled out below will be documented in 

the raw data and footnoted in the final report. 

10.2 Method Blanks 

Method blanks must be prepared with each analysis batch. At least five method blanks must be prepared. 

Method blanks may be injected multiple times, but no more than 3 injections should be removed from a single 

method blank. At a minimum, method blanks are analyzed prior to instmment calibration, prior to the analysis of 

CCV samples, and at the end of the analytical mn. 

The mean area count for each analyte in the method blanks must be less than 50% of the area count of the LOQ 

standard. The standard deviation of the area counts of these method blanks should be calculated and reported. If 

the mean area counts of the method blanks exceed 50% of the LOQ standard, then the LOQ must be raised to the 

first standard level in the curve that meets criteria, or alternatively, the method blanks must be evaluated 

statistically to determine outliers, or technical justification to eliminate one or more results should be made. 

10.3 Sample Replicates 

Samples duplicates are collected in the field. The relative percent difference, RPD, should be reported. RPD 

results greater than 20% will be flagged in the report, but will not be excluded from reporting. The requirement for 

replicates excludes field blanks. 

10.4 Surrogate Spikes 

Surrogate spikes are not required but may be used on project specific requirements. 

10.5 Lab Control Sample 

Triplicate lab control spikes at a minimum of two different concentrations are to be prepared with each preparation 

batch. Low lab control spikes should be prepared at concentrations in the range of five to ten times higher than the 

targeted LOQ and high lab control spikes should be prepared at concentrations near the mid-point of the curve. 

The relative standard deviation of the control spikes evaluated independently at each concentration level must be 

less than or equal to 20% and the average recovery must be 80-120%. If the above criteria are not met, the entire 

set of samples should be re-injected or re-prepared as appropriate. 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 9 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Determination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection 

Analysis 

Page 80 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011-

10.6 Field Matrix Spikes / Lab Matrix Spikes 

Recoveries of field matrix spikes and laboratory matrix spikes are anticipated to be between 70% and 130% of the 

fortified levels. Sample results for spikes outside of 70% to 130%, may be flagged as such (with expanded 

accuracy statements), or will not be reported due to non-compliant quality control samples. 

The targeted fortification levels should be at least 50% of the endogenous level and less than 10 times the 

endogenous level to be used without justification to determine the statement of accuracy for analytical results. 

The average of the sample and the field duplicate should be used to calculate the recovery. 

11 Data Analysis and Calculations 

Use the following equation to calculate the amount of analyte found (in ng/mL, based on peak area) using the 

standard curve (linear regression parameters) generated by an appropriate software program: 

A 1.* < -J/ / i\ (Peak Area-Intercept) _,^ 

Analyte found (ng/mL) = -^ ^—^ x DF 

Slope 

DF = factor by which the final volume was diluted, if necessary. 

For samples fortified with known amounts of analyte prior to extraction, use the following equation to calculate the 

percent recovery. 

_ _ Total analyte found (ng/mL) - Average analyte found in sample (ng/mL) 

Analyte added (ng/mL) 

12 Method Performance 

Any method perfonnance parameters that are not achieved must be considered in the evaluation of the data. 

Nonconfonnance to any specified parameters must be described and discussed if the Technical Manager (nonGLP study) or Study Director (GLP study) chooses to report the data. 

If criteria listed in this method perfonnance section are not met, maintenance may be perfonned on the system and 

samples reanalyzed, or other actions taken as appropriate. Document all actions in the raw data. 

If data are to be reported when perfonnance criteria have not been met, the data must be footnoted on tables and 

discussed in the text of the report. 

12.1 System Suitability 

System Suitability standards are not a required component of this method. If required by protocol or by the 

technical manager, a minimum of three system suitability samples are injected at the beginning of each analytical 

mn prior to the calibration curve. Typically these samples are at a concentration near the mid level of the 

calibration curve and are repeated injections fi'om one autosampler vial. The system suitability injections must 

have area counts with an RSD of S5% and a retention time RSD of ^ % to be compliant. 

12.2 Quantitation 

Calibration Curve: The coefficient of detennination (r^) value for the calibration curve must be greater than or 

equal to 0.990. Each point in the curve must be within ±25% of the theoretical concentration with the exception of 

the LLOQ, which may be within ±30%. 

CCV Performance: The calibration standards that are interspersed throughout the analytical sequence are 

evaluated as continuing calibration verifications in addition to being part of the calibration curve. The accuracy of 

each curve point must be within 25% of the theoretical value (within 30% for lowest curve point). Samples that are 

bracketed by CCVs not meeting these criteria must be reanalyzed. 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 10 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Detennination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection 

Analysis 

Page 81 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fami Landflll - MArch 2011 

Demonstration of Specificity: Specificity is demonstrated by chromatographic retention time (within 4% of 

standard) and the mass spectral response of unique ions. 

12.3 Sensitivity 

The targeted limit of quantitation for all analytes is 0.025 ng/mL. The LOQ for any specific analyte may vary 

depending on the evaluation of appropriate blanks and the accuracy of the low-level calibration curve points. Refer 

to Section 10 for additional details. 

12.4 Accurac y 

This method and required quality control samples are designed to generate data that are accurate to +l-ZO%. 

Section 10 contains additional infomiation regarding the required accuracy of laboratory control spikes, field matrix 

spikes and laboratory matrix spikes. 

12.5 Precision 

Samples should be collected in duplicate in the field. The relative percent difference, RPD, should be reported. 

RPD results greater than 20% will be flagged in the report, but will not be excluded fi'om reporting. The 

requirement for replicates excludes field blanks or rinse blanks. 

Section 10 contains additional infomiation regarding the required precision of laboratory control spikes. 

13 Pollution Prevention and Waste Management 

Waste generated when perfomning this method will be disposed of appropriately. The original samples will be 

archived at the 3M Environmental Laboratory in accordance with internal procedures. 

14 Records 

Each data package generated for a study must include all supporting infomnation for reconstmction of the data. 

Infomnation for the data package must include, but is not limited to the following items: study or project number, 

sample and standard prep sheets/records, instmment mn log (instmment batch records, instmment acquisition 

metfiod, summary pages), instmment results files, chromatograms, calibration curves, and data calculations. 

15 Affected Documents 

None. 

16 Revisions 

Revision 

Number Summarv of Changes 

ETS-8-044.0 Page 11 of 11 

Method of Analysis for the Detennination of Perfluorinated Compounds in Water by LC/MS/MS; Direct Injection 

Analysis 

Page 82 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Fami Landflll - MArch 2011 

ATTACHMENT D: DEVIATIONS 

Page 83 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

RECORD OF DEVIATION/NONCONFORMANCE 

/. Identification 

study / Project No. Date(s) of Occurrence: Document Number 

GLP10-01-02-14 March 14.2011 Protocol Amendment 14 

Deviation type • SOP D Equipment Procedure 0 Method 

(Check one) B Protocol D GPO q Other 

//. Description (attach extra pages es neede<0 

Mettiod Requiromente: 

(1) Sample bottles were prepared on 11^9/10 for sampling to occur as soon as access 

agreements were obtained. 

Acfaial procedure/process: 

(1) The GPO was revised on March 14.2011 to refled the new ^mpling date. The initial set of 

sample bottles were prepared and sent to Weston in Decatur, AL on 11/29/10. At that time, 

ttie actual sampling date was not known since access agreements were still be'mg acquired, 

in early February 2011, ttie prepared bottles were returned to the 3M Environmental Lab for 

disposal as the samples had not yet tieen collected. A new set of sample botttes will be 

prepared ^e week of March 14,2011 for sampling the week of March 21,2011. 

///, Actions Taken 

(sui^ B8 amendment issued, SOPrevi^on. etc.) Cmrective Action (D Yes 0 No) Reference: 

Acceptability of the nonconfomiing work: 

1) A copy of the revised GPO is attached (3 pages}. 

Anions: D Halting of Work O Client Notification d Work Recall D Wittiholding of Report 

D Ottier ' 

Project Lead/PAI Approval: fy^J-C. ^ Date:^yL-)^^ ^ 

Study Director Of GLP): riOMLh X / ^^®- ^^"^^'^ 

Sponsor Approval (for GLP prorocol deviations): mii i %fi>r^ii \ Date: '''VU 

Technical Reviewer (optional): NA i/ Date: NA 

Laboratory Department Manager Approval: Date: 

>/^/»v^»t(g^J<y/ 

iy. Auttiorization to Resume Worii 

\Mieie hs^ng of work ocxuned. resumppfm of work must first be approved by Latx)ratc»y Management LalMratory Department Manager Approval: NA Date: NA 

Deviation No. 

(assigned by Study Direi^or or Team Leader at the end of ^ud y or pmjec^ 

Page 84 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

^^^ 1 Environmental Health & Safety Operations, Environmental Laboratory 

GoncrsJ ^rojcsi Out5ij:is 

To: Gary Hohenstein, 3M EHS&Opns 

From: Susan Wolf, 3M EHS&Opns; Environmental Lab 

cc: William Reagen, 3M EHS&Opns; EnvinDnmental Lab 

Cliffton Jacoby, 3M EHS&Opns; Environmental Lab 

Jai Kesari, Weston Solutions 

Charles Young, Weston Solutions 

Tim Frinak, Weston Solutions 

Date: November 29,2010 

Revised: March 14,2011 

Subject: Analysis of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHS) and 

Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) in Groundwater, Soil and Sediment for the 3M Decatur 

Phase 3 Site-Related Monitoring Program; GLP Interim Report 14 - BFI Morris Farm Landfill 

Groundw/ater 

1 General Project Information 

Contacts 

Lab Request Number 

six Digit Department Number 

Project Schedule/Test Dates 

3M Sponsor Representative 

Gary Hohenstein 

3M EHS Operations 

3M Building 224-5W-03 

Saint Paul. MN 55144-1000 

Phone:(651)737-3570 

qahohenst$in(a!mmm.com 

3M Environmental Laboratory IManagement 

William K. Reagen 

3M EHS Opns, Environmental Laboratory 

260-5N-17 

651 733-9739 

wkreaaenOmmm.com 

Principal Analytical Investigator 

Cleston Lange 

3M EHS Opns, Environmental Laboratory 

260-5N-17 

651 733-9860 

cclanae@mmm.com 

Sampling Coordinator 

Timothy Frinak 

Weston Solutions 

Timothv.frinak(®westonsolutions.com 

Phone: (334)-332-9123 

GLP10-01-02-14 

Dept #530711. Project #0022674449 

WeekofMarch21,2011 

All verbal and written correspondence will be directed to Gary Hohenstein. 

Page 2 of 4 

Page 85 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Morris Farm Landfill - MArch 2011 

The GPO was revised on March 14,2011 to reflect the new sampling date. 

2 Background Information and Project Objective(s) 

The 3M EHS Operations Laboratory (3M Environmental Lab) will receive and analyze groundwater 

samples collected from monitoring wells actively maintained at the BFI Morris Farm Landfill. Each 

monitoring station at the facility is constructed with two wells, one monitoring the residuum / epikarst 

groundwater zone and one monitoring the l}edrock groundwater zone. Based on review of the well 

locations and groundwater flow patterns for the site, the following wells have been selected for sampling 

and the rationale is provided for each selected location: 

Well location MW-10 - This well location is upgradient of the active areas of the landfill. It is located in 

the northwest comer of the property. The location serves as an upgradient groundwater monitoring point 

for the site. 

Well location MW-07 - In a 1996 hydrogeologic investigation, this well location, constructed southwest of 

the active portions of the landfill, indicated upgradient conditions with possible seasonal impact from 

active areas at the landfill. Later reports indicate the location was subsequently abandoned. As a result, 

the adjacent well location, MW-05, has been selected to provide similar coverage for the area. 

Well locations MW-1,2, 3, 4. and 13 - These well locations are located along the east and south 

boundaries of the active landfill area and serve as downgradient moniton'ng points for the site. Review of 

recent groundwater monitoring reports have indicated sporadic elevated metals concentrations 

associated with well locations, MW-01, MW-02, MW-04, and MW-13, suggesting potential impact from 

site activities. As a result, these locations are proposed for monitoring downgradient groundwater 

conditions. Since MW-03 closes a potential data gap on the downgradient side of the landfill, this location 

has also been included in the sampling effort. 

Sampling locations will be analyzed for of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate 

(PFHS) and Perfluorobutane Sulfonate (PFBS) as part of the BFI Mon-is Fann Landfill groundwater 

sampling. Analyses will be conducted under the GLP requirements of EPA TSCA Good Laboratory 

Practice Standards 40 CFR 792. 

Groundwater samples from Decatur, AL will be collected by Weston Solutions personnel as soon as 

access is granted. The 3M Environmental Laboratory will prepare the sample bottles with all required 

spikes to ensure that results for PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS are of a known precision and accuracy. The final 

report will be submitted to Gary Hohenstein and Jai Kesari upon completion under interim report GLP10-

01-02-13. 

3 Project Schedule 

Sample collection bottles will be prepared by the 3M Environmental Laboratory. Sample bottles will be shipped 

in coolers overnight to 3M Decatur for anival by Friday, March 18,2011. Sample bottles should be stored 

refrigerated on-site until sample collection. 

Martin Smith \ Weston Trailer 

3M Decatur Plant 

1400 State Docks Road 

Decatur, Alabama 35601 

Page 3 of4 

Page 86 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fann Landfill - MArch 2011 

4 Test Parameters 

The targeted limit of quantitation will be 0.025 ng/mL (ppb) for PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS. 

A total of fourteen sampling locations have been specified. For each sampling location, a total of four sample 

bottles will be collected (sample, sample duplicate, low-level field matrix spike, and high-level field matrix spike). 

The "fill to here" line on each 250 mL Nalgene tiottle will be 200 mL. One set of trip blanks consisting of 

reagent-grade water, a low-level trip blank spike, and a high-level trip blank spike will be prepared at the 3M 

Environmental Laboratory and sent to the sampling location with the other bottles. The low field matrix spike 

will be prepared at 1 ng/mL and the high field matrix spike at 10 ng/mL. One additional bottle will be prepared 

to be used for the preparation of the equipment rinseate blank. In addition to the sample bottles, a 1-L 

container of Milli Q water will t>e included to he used for the preparation of the rinseate blank. 

M sample bottles will include the addition of ^'OrPFBS, "C3-PFHS, and ^^Cg-PFOS, rintemal standards) at a 

nominal concentration of 1 ng/mL. All sample bottles will also include the addition of C4-PFOS (surrogate 

spike) at a nominal concentration of 0.1 ng/mL. A total of 60 sample bottles will be prepared. 

5 Test Methods 

Samples will be prepared and analyzed by LC/MS/MS foltowing ETS-8-044.0 "Determinatton of Perfluorinated 

Compounds In Water by High Perfonmance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Direct Injection 

Analysis". Altemately, samples may be analyzed by ETS 8-154.3 "Determination of Peri1uorinat«j Adds, 

Alcohols, Amides, and Sulfonates In Water By Solid Phase Extraction and High Performance Liquid 

Chromatography/Mass Specti-ometry". 

Wfiere applicable, samples will be analyzed against an intemal standard calibration curve. Each curve point will 

contain isotopically-labeled PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS at a nominal concenti^tion of 1 ng/mL The calibration 

curve will be generated by taking the ratio of tiie standard peak area counts over tiie intemal standard peak 

area counts to fit ttie data for each analyte. 

Lalwratory control samples prepared with tiie samples must have an average recovery witiiin 100±20% and a 

RSD <20%. The data quality objective for ttiis study is quantitative results for the target analytes witii an 

analytical accuracy of 100+30%. FiekJ matrix spikes not yielding recoveries within 100±30% will be addressed 

in the report and the final accuracy statement may be adjusted accordingly. 

6 Reporting Requirements 

For each sampling location, tiie report will contain ttie results for Uie sample, sample duplicate, and ttie two field 

matrix spikes. Trip blank and trip blank spikes will be reported for tiie sampling event as will any 

equipment/rinseate blanks prepared in the field. Laboratory contixil spikes of reagent water prepared at ttie time 

of sample extraction will also be reported and used to evaluate ttie overall mettiod accuracy and precision. 

Mettiod t)lanks of reagent water prepared at the time of sample extraction will be used to detennine the method 

detection limit. For ttiose sampling tocations where tiie field matiix spike level was not appropriate, due to 

higher than expected analyte concenbBtions, a laboratory matiix spike may be prepared and will be included in 

tiie final report 

Page 4 of 4 

Page 87 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

BFI Mon-is Fami Landfill - MArch 2011 

RECORD OF DEVIATION/NONCONFORMANCE 

/. Identmeatton 

Study / Project No. Date(s) of Occurrence: Document Number 

GLP10-01-02-14 g110328a. k110404a ETS-8-044.0 

Deviation type O SOP D Equipment PttKedure EI Method 

(Check one) D Protocoi D GPO a Other //. Description (attach extiB pages as nee<ted) 

Method Requirements: 

1. LCS average recoveries and RSO within ±20% (seciioni 0.5). 

2. FMS recovery within ±30% (section 10.6). 

.3. Sample RPD within ±20%. 

Actual procedure/process: 

1. The RSO for the low set of LCS was 23% for PFOS In run k1104O4a The mid and high s M of ECF LCSs 

for PFOS were 138% and 133% In mn k110404a. 

2. Sample MW05 Low FMS recoveiy was 134% for PFHS. (g110328a) 

3. SaiTi()ieMW10RP0was21%fiarPFHS. Sample MVV03 RPD was 22% for PFHS. (g11032aa) 

///. Actions Taken 

(such as amandnentIssued, SOPraviskn etc) 

Corrective Action (D Yes 12 No) Reference: 

^xeptabiilty of the nonconfomning work: 

1. The reooveries lor the faXng LCS (fmear + branched) at 138% and 133% will be flagged bi the finai report 

All LCSs for PFOS prepared with this study were evahjated t>y ET8-12-012 to detemww ttie mettMd 

analytical uncertainty. The analytical uncertainty when evaluated by ETS-12-012 was determined to be t 

23% far PFOS. However, the analytical uncertainty for the samples in run k110404a wil be set at ±36%, 

based on the recovery of the mid asi of linear -•• branched LCS. 

2. The FMS Low recovery to'PFHS wit be flagged In the finai report. 

3. The foiling RPOs will be flagged In the final report. 

iActions: D Halting of Work D Client Notification • Worit Recall^ O Witttholdtng of Report 

0 Other D«^ittons wiii be mtodTin final report 

Project Lead/PAi Approval: /! -v [ Date: 

Study Director (if GLP): ^ ^ HL . i' ^ j Da*' 

1 1 

Sponsor Approval (for GLP protocol deviations): NA j Date: NA 

Technical Reviewer (optional): NA j Date: NA 

Wu 

y 

LaboratQiy Department Manager Approval: : Date: 

IV. AuthorbaHon to Resume Work 

Where haltbKi of work ocam9d,resimotkm of work must Itr^ be amrowdbr Laboratory itaimaanw^ 

Laboratory Department Manager Approvsri: NA [ Date: NA 

Devfatiott No. 

(asslgnadbySSiKt/DinclvorTeemLeadvstlhaendofstudyorpmieet) 

ETS-4-008.7 Page 1 of 1 

Documentatton of Deviations and Control of Nonconforming Testing 

Page 88 of 89 
GLP10-01-02; Amended Interim Report 14 

Analysis of PFBS, PFHS, and PFOS in Groundwater 

Attachment E BFI Moms Farni Landfill - MArch 2011 

3M ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY 

Final Study Report Amendment 

study number: GLP10-01-01-14 

Study title: Analysis of PFOA in Groundwater Samples Collected at the BFI Morris Farm Landfill 

in Hillsboro, AL in March 2011. 

Study Director Jaisimha Kesari, P.E., DEE 

Amendment date: 6/20/11 Amendment number: 1 

This amendment modifies the following portions of the final report: 

• Cover Page (Page 1) - Change the title of the report from "Analysis of PFOA in Groundwater 

Samples Collected at the BFI Morris Farm Landfill in Decatur, AL in March 2011", to "Analysis 

of PFOA in Groundwater Samples Collected at the BFI Morris Famri Landfill in Hillsboro, AL in 

March 2011". 

• GLP Compliance Statement (Page 3) - Change the title of the report from "Analysis of PFOA 

in Groundwater Samples Collected at the BFI Morris Fann Landfill in Decatur, AL in March 

2011", to "Analysis of PFOA in Groundwater Samples Collected at the BFI Morris Farm 

Landfill in Hillsboro, AL in March 2011". 

• Quality Assurance Statement (Page 4) - Change the title of the report from "Analysis of PFOA 

in Groundwater Samples Collected at the BFI Morris Farm Landfill in Decatur, AL in March 

2011", to "Analysis of PFOA in Groundwater Samples Collected at the BFI Mon-is Farm 

Landfill in Hillsboro, AL in March 2011". 

• Section 2 (Page 9) - Changed the location of the BFI Morris Landfill from Decatur, AL to 

Hillsboro, AL 

• Table 1 (Page 10) - Changed the table heading to indicate MFL Groundwater samples were 

collected in Hillsboro, AL. 

• Section 3 (Page 10) - Paragraph 1, changed the reference to the location of the BFI Morris 

Farm Landfill from Decatur, AL to Hillsboro, AL. 

• Section 6 (Page 13) - Paragraph 1, changed the reference to the location of the BFI Morris 

Farm Landfill from Decatur, AL to Hillsboro, AL. 

• Table 2 (Page 13) - Removed the sample location reference to Decatur, AL 

Reason for the amendment: 

The location of the BFI Morris Famn was incorrectly identified as being located in Decatur, AL. 

The BFI Morris Famn is actually located in Hillsboro, AL. 

Approved by: 

Jaisimha Kesari, Study Director Date 

WillJam1<. Reagen, Ph.D., 3M Environmental Laboratory Manager Date 

Page 1 of 1 

Page 89 of 89