alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 625

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans

Affairs to continue payment of monthly educational assistance benefits

to veterans enrolled at educational institutions during periods between

terms if the interval between such periods does not exceed eight weeks.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1999

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. KASICH, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr.

PORTMAN, Mr. REGULA, Mr. SAWYER, and Mrs. JONES of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to continue payment of

monthly educational assistance benefits to veterans enrolled at educational institutions during periods between

terms if the interval between such periods does not exceed eight weeks.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Education

5 Benefits Equity Act of 1999’’.
2

•HR 625 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE INTERVAL

2 PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subclause (C) of the third sen4 tence of section 3680(a) of title 38, United States Code,

5 is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(C) during periods between school terms where

7 the educational institution certifies the enrollment of

8 the eligible veteran or eligible person on an individ9 ual term basis if (i) the period between such terms

10 does not exceed eight weeks, and (ii) both the term

11 preceding and following the period are not shorter in

12 length than the period.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to payments of edu15 cational assistance under title 38, United States Code, for

16 months beginning on or after the date of the enactment

17 of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

MODEL ME KIDS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. 

MODEL-ME-KIDS, INC.,

Defendant.

 

 Case No. 1:22-cv-23871-JEM

REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF CLERK’S DEFAULT

Plaintiff Model Me Kids, LLC, by and through its counsel, hereby requests 

that the Clerk enter default in this matter against Defendant Model-Me-Kids, Inc. on 

the ground that Defendant has failed to appear or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint within the times prescribed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

On December 8, 2022, Defendant, through its principal, was served with a 

copy of the Summons and Complaint in this case. (Dkt. 6). Thereafter, at 

Defendant’s principal’s request, Plaintiff permitted Defendant up to and including 

January 20, 2023 to respond to the Complaint. See Declaration of James Slater ¶ 5 

(“Slater Decl.”), attached as Exhibit 1. On January 20, 2023, Defendant’s principal 

purported to file a motion for extension of time for Defendant to respond to the 

Complaint. (Dkt. 5). Because the motion was filed without a lawyer representing 

Defendant—a nonprofit entity—, see Slater Decl. ¶ 8, it is a nullity and does not 

satisfy the requirement of “otherwise defend[ing]” the lawsuit for purposes of 

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

avoiding default under Rule 55(a). See Victims of Holocaust Art Theft v. Czech Republic, 

No. 12-80420-CIV-COHN, at *2 (S.D. Fla. June 4, 2012) (the requirement that a 

corporation appear in federal courts “only through licensed counsel” is “true 

regardless of whether the entity is a for-profit enterprise or a nonprofit 

organization”), quoting Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993); see 

also Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985). 

Accordingly, the time allowed for Defendant to respond to the Complaint has 

expired and no further extensions were given by Plaintiff. (Dkt. 6; Slater Decl. ¶ 6).

Defendant has failed to answer or otherwise defend the Complaint as set forth above.

Defendant is an entity and therefore the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act does not 

apply. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Model Me Kids, LLC requests that a default be 

entered against Defendant Model-Me-Kids, Inc.

Dated: January 23, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,

SLATER LEGAL PLLC

By: James M. Slater

James M. Slater (FBN 111779)

333 S.E. 2nd Ave. #2000

Miami, Florida 33131

james@slater.legal

Tel: (305) 523-9023

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 2 of 3
3

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this document was mailed to 

Model-Me-Kids, Inc., c/o Shushona Cooper, 17801 N.W. 2nd Ave #211, Miami 

Gardens, Florida 33169. 

By: James M. Slater

James M. Slater 

Case 1:22-cv-23871-JEM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/23/2023 Page 3 of 3
#### § 101-27.301 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--J Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 27, 1999, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), J Consortium, Inc. has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership 
status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ACE 
Associated Compiler Experts Br., Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Ericsson, 
Alvsjo, Sweden; Esmertec ag, Zurich, Switzerland; Swiss Federal 
Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland; O'Reilly Institute, 
Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland; Ralph Boroughs, Chattanooga, TN; Lois 
Goldthwaite, Claygate, Surrey KTIO OSA, United Kingdom; Samuel E. 
Riffle, Providence, RI; and Fridtjof Siebert, Stuttgart, Germany have 
been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and J Consortium, Inc. intends to file 
additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On August 9, 1999, J Consortium, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. A notice has not yet 
been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-15603 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 102-118.250 Who is accountable for the issuance and use of GBL and GTR forms?

Agencies and employees are responsible for the issuance and use of GBL and GTR forms and are accountable for their disposition.
#### § 169.200 What is the purpose of this subpart?

This subpart implements Regulation 19-1 of SOLAS Chapter V (SOLAS V/19-1) and requires certain ships engaged on an international voyage to transmit vessel identification and position information electronically. This requirement enables the Coast Guard to obtain long range identification and tracking (LRIT) information and thus heightens our overall maritime domain awareness, enhances our search and rescue operations, and increases our ability to detect anomalies and deter transportation security incidents.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

Case Number: 22-23945-CIV-MARTINEZ/BECERRA

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SMARTBIZ TELECOM LLC, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY 

Defendant Smartbiz Telecom LLC (“SBT”) hereby gives notice that it withdraws its 

Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. 17). The Parties are currently engaging in discovery. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Sean W. Gellis 

SEAN W. GELLIS 

Florida Bar No. 105924 

Gellis Law, PLLC 

300 W. Pensacola St. 

Tallahassee, Florida 32301 

Telephone: (561) 371-2848 

Email: sean@gellislaw.com 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been filed 

electronically through the Court’s CM/ECF portal and served via the same on all parties of record 

on this March 28, 2023. 

/s/ Sean W. Gellis 

SEAN W. GELLIS 

Case 1:22-cv-23945-JEM Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/28/2023 Page 1 of 1
Technical Assistance for the AmeriCorps Seniors’ American Rescue 

Plan Senior Demonstration Program

Introduction to AmeriCorps, AmeriCorps Seniors and SDPs: Tuesday, August 24th

Tuesday, September 14th canceled, please see recording in 

Litmos:https://americorpsonlinecourses.litmos.com?C=6286676

• In this session, we will review AmeriCorps, AmeriCorps Seniors and SDP. Take 

questions and answers.

• English live captioning is available at the August 24th event.

A Tour of the Notice of Funding Opportunity: Wednesday August 25th 

Wednesday, September 15, 2021 canceled, please see recording in 

Litmos:https://americorpsonlinecourses.litmos.com?C=6286676

• In this session, we will review the ARP Notice of Funding Opportunity and conduct 

a Q&A

• Live captioning in English is reserved for August 25th

SDP in Action: Mobilizing a Generation: for Thursday, August 26th

Thursday, September 16th canceled, please see recording in 

Litmos:https://americorpsonlinecourses.litmos.com?C=6286676

• In this session, we’ll look at the Senior Demonstration program (SDP) itself and 

how communities all across the country use SDP grants to mobilize older 

Americans in service that addresses their unique local needs. We’ll explore the 

kinds of partnerships they form and how SDP has been used to address the 

funding priorities for this competition, with some specific examples to help 

potential applicants envision their own SDP programs.
Understanding the National Performance Measures: Tuesday, August 31st 

September 21st canceled, please see recording in 

Litmos:https://americorpsonlinecourses.litmos.com?C=6286676In this session, we will 

review the American Rescue Plans’ National Performance Measures and conduct a

Q&A.

• Live captioning in English

Submitting Your Application Via eGrants: Wednesday, September 1

Wednesday, September 22, 2021 canceled, please see recording in 

Litmos:https://americorpsonlinecourses.litmos.com?C=6286676

• In this session, we’ll walk through the process of submitting an application in 

AmeriCorps’ electronic grants management system, eGrants, step-by-step. We’ll 

give some pointers on using the system and look inside the system so you’re 

prepared to submit your application seamlessly.

• Live captioning in English

Best Practices in Budget Development – Stipened Programs Wednesday 

September 8th has been cancelled, you can register for the September 29, 

2021 from 3 to 4 pm ET- Best Practices in Budget Development with this link 

https://americorps.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_8lYJ_RW8SOev1LnMO

6c-gw

Best Practices in Budget Development: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 from 

3 to 4 pm ET

• In this session, AmeriCorps Seniors and OGA we will review best practices in 

budget development for ARP funding opportunities and conduct a Q&A.

• Live captioning in English and Spanish

• Registration 

Link: https://americorps.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_8lYJ_RW8SOev1Ln

MO6c-gw

2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company)
for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Keith Guelpa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ R. Keith Guelpa    
|    |  | R. Keith Guelpa        
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | March 31, 2006
13460 S.W. 24 St. Miami, FL 33175

TEL: 305-877-9722 January 25, 2016 **Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division**

**. 800 Independence Ave. S.W.**  **Washington D.C. 20591**

**To Whom It May Concern:**

**This letter is to inquire the status of Juan C. Mele ndez DBA Orthotek petition for Section 333 Exemptio**  **n, submitted for review on May, 2015. I would like to make sure,**  **the agency has all the required documentation to p roceed with a**  **ruling on my petition. If there is any additional i nformation that I can be provided to expedite this**  **process , please let me know.** 

**Best regards.**

**Best regards.**

Juan C. Melendez DBA Orthotek
**Juan C. Melendez**
**13460 S.W. 24 St. Miami, FL 33175** 

**TEL: 305-877-9722 orthotek@otekmap.com**
135	San	Lorenzo	Avenue,	Suite	770,	Coral	Gables,	Florida	33146

TEL 305.230.4884			FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/TORRES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC 

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER 

AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE REPLY SUPPORTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW

Brian H. Pollock, Esq. and FairLaw Firm, request the Court to grant an extension of time 

to file their Reply supporting the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel pursuant to t to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12, Local Rule 7.1, and other applicable Rules and laws, based upon the lack of opposition and 

the following good cause:

1. The undersigned filed the Corrected Motion to Withdraw as Counsel on 

December 22, 2023 [ECF No. 235]. 

2. The Court expedited the date for Defendants to respond to December 29, 2023. 

[ECF No. 234.]

3. Defendant’, 450 North River Drive, LLC., d/b/a/ Kiki on The River, RJ River, 

LLC, and Roman Jones, filed their Response in Opposition on December 22, 2023 [ECF No. 

237].

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 238 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2023 Page 1 of 2
135	San	Lorenzo	Avenue,	Suite	770,	Coral	Gables,	Florida	33146

TEL 305.230.4884			FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

4. The undersigned counsel is out of the country and not scheduled to return to the

country until the evening of January 3, 2024, and to the office on January 4, 2024.

5. The undersigned requests a brief extension of time until January 5, 2024, to file the

Reply supporting the Corrected Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. 

6. The undersigned conferred with defense counsel, who did not oppose the relief

requested.

WHEREFORE Brian H. Pollock, Esq. and FairLaw Firm respectfully request the Court 

to grant the brief extension of time requested above.

Respectfully submitted this 28th day of December 2023, 

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 238 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2023 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37530-37531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Manual for Courts-Martial; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Joint Service Committee on Military Justice (JSC).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda for 
the 2000 draft annual review public meeting of the JSC. This notice 
also describes the functions of the JSC.

DATES: Wednesday, 28 June 2000 at 2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Room 808, 1501 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22209-2403.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Colonel Thomas C. Jaster, 
U.S. Air Force Legal Services Agency, 112 Luke Avenue, Room 343, 
Bolling Air Force Base, Washington, DC 20332-8000, (202) 767-1539; FAX 
(202) 404-8755

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:   

Agenda

    The JSC will receive public comment concerning its 2000 draft 
annual review of the Manual for Courts-Martial as published in the 
Federal Register at 65 FR 30963 on May 15, 2000.
    The Judge Advocates General established the JSC in 1972. The JSC 
currently operates under Department of Defense Directive 5500.17, May 
8, 1996. The function of the JSC is to improve military justice through 
preparation and

[[Page 37531]]

evaluation of proposed amendments and changes to the Uniform Code of 
Military Justice and the Manual for Courts-Martial.
    This notice is provided in accordance with DoD Directive 5500.17, 
``Role and Responsibilities of the Joint Service Committee (JSC) on 
Military Justice,'' May 8, 1996. This notice is intended only to 
improve the internal management of the Federal Government. It is not 
intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, 
enforceable at lay by any party against the United States, its 
agencies, its officers, or any person.

L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-15081 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### § 102-3.180 What does this subpart cover and how does it apply?

This subpart provides guidance to agencies on compliance with sec. 15 of the Act (codified at 5 U.S.C. 1014). Section 15 establishes requirements that apply only in connection with a funding or other written agreement involving an agency's use of advice or recommendations provided to the agency by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) or the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA), if such advice or recommendations were developed by use of a committee created by either academy. For purposes of this subpart, NAS also includes the National Academy of Engineering, the National Academy of Medicine, and the National Research Council. Except with respect to NAS committees that were the subject of judicial actions filed before December 17, 1997, no part of the Act other than sec. 15 applies to any committee created by NAS or NAPA.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Mark Szporka, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PainCare Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 19, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark Szporka                     
|Mark Szporka, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 101-29.301-2 Federal Standardization Handbook.

The Assistant Administrator for Federal Supply and Services will issue and maintain on a current basis a “Federal Standardization Handbook.” The Federal Standardization Handbook sets forth operating procedures and applicable definitions used in the development of Federal product descriptions under the Assigned Agency Plan described therein. Federal agencies shall adhere to the provisions of the handbook in the development and coordination of Federal product descriptions.
§ 3030.284 Limitations on discounts below avoided cost. ( a ) No proposal to adjust a rate may set a workshare discount that would be below the cost avoided by the Postal Service for not providing the applicable service, unless at least one of the following reasons provided in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section applies.
( b ) The proposed workshare discount is associated with a new postal service, a change to an existing postal service, or a new workshare initiative.
( c ) The proposed workshare discount is a minimum of 20 percent more than the existing workshare discount.
( d ) The proposed workshare discount is set in accordance with a Commission order issued pursuant to § 3030.286.
( e ) The percentage passthrough for the proposed workshare discount is at least 85 percent.