alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         442,256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 20,039,541
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,742,759
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,313,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,939,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      9,646,864
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,516
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,790,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,939,241
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,454,640
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,607,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,456,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             576,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                815,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                   363,875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            451,163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   451,163
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 102-37.370 Do liquidation plans require public notice?

Yes, a liquidation plan constitutes a major amendment of a SASP's plan of operation and, as such, requires public notice.
Exhibit 99.3

                         Independent Accountants' Report


The Board of Directors
Direct Merchants Credit Card Bank N.A.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Assertion, that Direct Merchants Credit Card Bank N.A., (the
Servicer) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers exclusive of standards I.4., III.3., III.4., V.2., V.3., and
V.4., as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. Management is responsible
for the Servicer's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Servicer's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Servicer's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Servicer complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 15, 2005



<PAGE>



                             Management's Assertion


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, Direct Merchants Credit Card
Bank N.A. (the "Servicer") complied in all material respects with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for the
following:

-    Minimum servicing standards I.4., III.3., III.4., V.2., V.3., and V.4.,
     which the Servicer has interpreted as being inapplicable to credit card
     servicing.

As of and for the same period, the Servicer had in effect a fidelity bond, and
errors and omissions policies in the amount of $55 million.

                            DIRECT MERCHANTS CREDIT CARD BANK N.A.



                                   /s/Scott R. Fjellman
                            Name:  Scott R. Fjellman
                            Title: Senior Vice President, Treasurer & Cashier



Date: March 15, 2005
EXHIBIT 1

Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 11-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2022 Page 1 of 4
Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 11-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2022 Page 2 of 4
Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 11-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2022 Page 3 of 4
Case 9:22-cv-81780-DMM Document 11-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2022 Page 4 of 4
§ 102-33.55 Are there restrictions on acquiring Government aircraft? Yes, you may not acquire— ( a ) More aircraft than you need to carry out your official business;
( b ) Aircraft of greater size or capacity than you need to perform your Governmental functions cost-effectively; or
( c ) Federal aircraft that Congress has not authorized your agency to acquire or Federal aircraft or commercial aircraft and services for which you have not followed the requirements in OMB Circulars A-76 and A-11 (*available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb*).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                          38,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     88,490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,511
<PP&E>                                         131,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,323
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   346,368
<SALES>                                        317,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               320,874
<CGS>                                          219,125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  309,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,755
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,627
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53



</TABLE>
#### § 102-75.370 May a State, or any political subdivision thereof, certify to a disposal agency that it needs a surplus power transmission line and the right-of-way acquired for its construction to meet the requirements of a public or cooperative power project?

Yes, section 13(d) of the Surplus Property Act of 1944 (50 U.S.C. App. 1622(d)) allows any State or political subdivision, or any State or Government agency or instrumentality to certify to the disposal agency that a surplus power transmission line and the right-of-way acquired for its construction is needed to meet the requirements of a public or cooperative power project.
# APwellrecordsNov04_p1
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED CONSENTS TO JOIN 

(Amehed Rosabal Garcia) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Amended 

Consents to Join in these proceedings by Amehed Rosabal Garcia.

Dated this 22nd day of August 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 194 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-41.50 May we retain forfeited personal property for official use?

Yes, you may retain for official use personal property forfeited to your agency, except for property you are required by law to sell. Retention of large sedans and limousines for official use is only authorized under the provisions of part 102-34 of this subchapter B. Except for the items noted in § 102-41.35, report to GSA all forfeited personal property not being retained for official use.
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 24.10


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and
each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.




                                                /s/ David P. Zarin, M.D.
                                                ------------------------------
                                                David P. Zarin, M.D.


                                                February 18, 2004
§ 102-75.970 How long is the landholding agency responsible for the expense of protection and maintenance of excess and surplus real property pending its transfer or disposal? Generally, the landholding agency is responsible for the cost of protection and maintenance of excess or surplus property until the property is transferred or disposed, but not more than 15 months. However, the landholding agency is responsible for providing and funding protection and maintenance during any delay beyond that 15 month period, if the landholding agency— ( a ) Requests deferral of the disposal beyond the 15 month period;
( b ) Continues to occupy the property beyond the 15 month period to the detriment of orderly disposal; or
( c ) Otherwise takes actions that result in a delay in the disposition beyond the 15 months.
# V :^-r;ARrMENTO F ; ;' • NSFORTATiO^ i Garde n Cit y Are aChambe r o f Commerc e '-' • -'-' ^ i b A S ^ 0 5 Leadin g Businesses . Leadin g Coonnunities . Advocacy . Cjjporttiiuty . Impact . Fo.ra s D.Pau l Josep h Piesident P h (620 ) 276-326 4 Fx(62C ^ 276-329 0 Jul y 7,201 1 Department

o f Transportation Denni s Devany Essentia l Air Servic e Divisio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse

y Avenue , S

E Washington , D. C 20590 Dea r Mr . Devany , Th e Garde n Cit

y Are aChambe

r o f Commerc e Boar

do f Director s support s th e Cit

y o f Garde n City' s recen

t decisio n o f

recommendin g America

n Eagl e Airline s a s th e city' s Essentia

l Air Servic e (EAS ) Provider . Afte r discussion , th e boar

d vote d unanimously to suppor t th e city' s decisio n to authoriz e th e mayor , cit

y manage r an ddirector

o f Aviatio n t o sig n arecommendatio n o f America n Eagl e to th e Departmen

t o f Transportatio n i n Washington , D.C . Th e Chamber' s Governmen t Affiir s committe e first

discussedth e ide ai n a committe e meetin g wit

h Rachell e Powell , th e airpor t manage r a t Garden Cit

y Regiona l Airport . Th e committee vote d unanimously to recommendto th e ful l boardo f director s th e approva

l o f America n Eagl e ove

r fou r othe r airline s that

submitte dbid s t o th e city . Th e city' s actio n follow s astud y performe don air

servic e fo r Garden Cit

y an d th e surrounding area . Th e Chambe

r imderstand s tha

t th e cit y ha s been growing it s airpor t an dit s servic e t o appea l abroade r market , An

dthoug h ther

e ar e drawbacks fo

r some individual s and businesse s tha

t dependo n flights i n andou t o f Denver , th e Chambe

r realize s thi s i s overal l bes t

decisio n fo

r th e futur e o f our communit y an dou r regiona l airport . Additionally , tli e Chambe

r understand s th e communit

y wil l giv e u p acoupl e mor e dail y flight s ou

t o f Garde n Cit y Regiona l Airport , but

th e servic e America

n Eagl e 151 1 East Fulto n Terrac e * Garde n City , Kansas 67846-616 5 P : 620 ) 276-3264 . ext . 20 5 * F : 620 ) 276-329 0July 18 , 201 1

provide s wil l b e top-notch . The Dallas-Ft . Wort h hub i s excellen

t an dth e opportunit

y America n Eagl e bring s t o th e tabl e i s substantial . Whil e our community' s recommendatio n wU l b e considere d b y th e DOT , th e Chambe r understand s th e EA S contract wil l no t b e awarde d based solel y o n our recommendation .

Hie : Lette r Supponin g Ot/ s Anyrira n Eagl e EA S Oxk e 07181 1

• Pag e 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q 
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
          
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1997   
<CASH>                                    3,211
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            29,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                880
<INVENTORY>                                  67
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         40,557
<PP&E>                                   12,260
<DEPRECIATION>                            6,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           47,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    29,018
<BONDS>                                   2,024
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  5,535
<OTHER-SE>                               10,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             47,217
<SALES>                                  76,674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         76,674
<CGS>                                    67,686
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            67,686
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,510
<INCOME-TAX>                                615
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         886
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .61
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32 (a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with this Yearly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company")  on
Form  10-KSB  for  the  year ending December 31,  2003,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Richard  Govatski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies  to  the
best  of  his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a)  or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard Govatski
--------------------
Richard Govatski
Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2004
§ 101-5.303 Guiding principles. The following principles will control the scope of the health services to be provided in keeping with the objective: ( a ) Employees who work in groups of 300 or more, counting employees of all departments or agencies who are scheduled to be on duty at one time in the same building or group of buildings in the same locality will constitute the minimum number of employees required to warrant the establishment of a health service of a scope specified in § 101-5.304.
( b ) As an exception to paragraph (a) of this section, health services of the scope specified in § 101-5.304 may be provided for employees who work in groups of less than 300 where the employing department or agency determines that working conditions involving unusual health risks warrant such provision.
( c ) Treatment and medical care in performance-of-duty cases will be provided to employees as set forth in the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (5 U.S.C. 751 *et seq.*).
( d ) Reimbursable costs for providing health services will be based on an operating budget which is a summary of all costs required to operate the health service. The reimbursement cost is prorated to participating agencies by means of a per capital formula computed by dividing the operating budget of the health service by the total number of employees sponsored for service. The size of the Federal population served, the compensation of the employees of the health unit, and other factors of medical economics prevalent in the area are factors which affect the local reimbursement cost. Further, in appropriate cases where more than one health unit is servicing employees housed in the same general locality, costs may be equalized by combining the operating budgets of all such units and dividing the total of the operating budgets by the number of employees sponsored. Special industrial conditions or other abnormal health or accident risk environments may increase the per capita cost.
[30 FR 12883, Oct. 9, 1965, as amended at 35 FR 6651, Apr. 25, 1970]
§ 102-33.5 To whom do these rules apply? ( a ) The rules in this part apply to all Federally-funded aviation activities of executive branch agencies of the U.S. Government who use Government aircraft to accomplish their official business, except for the exemptions listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The rules in this part do not apply to the following: ( 1 ) The Armed Forces, except for: ( i ) Section 102-33.25(e) and (g), which concern responsibilities related to the Interagency Committee for Aviation Policy (ICAP); and
( ii ) Subpart D of this part, “Disposing of Government Aircraft and Aircraft Parts.”
( 2 ) The President or Vice President and their offices;
( 3 ) Aircraft when an executive agency provides Government-furnished avionics for commercially owned or privately owned aircraft for the purposes of technology demonstration or testing; and
( 4 ) Privately owned aircraft that agency personnel use for official travel (even though such use is Federally-funded).
#### § 102-42.30 Who is responsible for the security, care and handling, and delivery of gifts and decorations to GSA, and all costs associated with such functions?

The employing agency is responsible for the security, care and handling, and delivery of gifts and decorations to GSA, and all costs associated with such functions.
### From: To: 

## Subject: Date: Attachments: HODD J oa n



## EAS (OST ) D ocu m e nt DOT- OST-199 7 -2 70 6 Fri day , A u g u st 2 3 , 20 13 6 : 14:47 PM i m ag e 001 . p no ,~ : i ; , "

_ ; , ' ; l . . .

!- 

# I would like to voice my opinion in regard to bringing back SkyWest and changing the Vernal to Denver flight to Salt Lake . Most business in Vernal is oil field related , therefore our regional offices are located in Denver. The direct flight ensures my ability to attend meetings that are located in Denver. If I were to have to drive , the time away would not permit my attendance. 

# Joa n Ho pp N A LC O Ch a mpion ! An E colab Comp a ny '' ' :GcC' 

## f,. 

# ~sC'n::: .. !p; r · · a· . . 

### . ! . - 

## ' }< . J',- T 435 78; 

## 4?J7 F Lt ~ ;3 78 9 

# 4:$: 6 E Joan Hopp@CH A MP-TECH.CO M

T~ ! e ' ~ ' - - or ;· j1 r . . t!cn

: ;~'~n ' 8 S ;-'- : oj i 

### . rav bt: . ,:::~r-:7 ; '-
- ;?:!~ia! c;r~(/');- ':.;· IV ;: ' 2c ; e~ '- - ; " ': ': : : "fI"'"di 

## r -n'0 'r;Je
- :i 

### <' : '~ .-~ -'(,"11\1 (: -·0 

### jy -)("+ , ~ ; l-:' : · ' ~i\ ." , d'_~ . : ~i ' ' -: '~ )rC C ! : : iZ < ? "L , " X , n 3r ;~ e ,~ ' ::: l i X ':" i L, ' : '- -~ 0 ;~ , ' ; :: ,9 nr : t ~~,e !j " ; ' :;: "-- 1 O ? Q :F ~ ';: ' ~ ;· Jt: ' L .. :- ; : :r) d '- E ) rC-~{-: ' : ' t ~: ~ ;d '/e ~T - :) " :0 : ~ . er,OS0 ;2c j ~ , ',: ", \, ,~ .

' ./ 0t ) 8~ ' : : : " , :; )Lf isO that S F :.;' ' " "e " ;!?' ,.' . :j I : : - ';:: :~; fT":

•• ~t !Ci - ' :,;' 

### C-(},:.y'r;~l + , :; -, ' ? 3 - t , tc 2· • . ~:'. t \ ;; . .. . ~ ( : f . tj ~

_ ,: l \ :' - '~k', i (! . j G . : - :r : ~ < :i;:: ~ :' " " : 8 "'~ : ' : pIClh : b : 'c :, : ' ' .'jOLt h: :p e ~e~:e ' ,jE -:j : : 11: : , ; : ,~ r ral ; -~ 2f" O :- p i e - : ·'s ~ !r "' k; " : ~ rl;a!~l\ ; ~; f.;rifj hE' ~ ~, -:. '·~ er OJ [" . ; f;. ·; ·' 8" " ': :;'" oJ>' : ' . Ji . · : 03t:; ~ : ' -Jj ~ '? - ' ~ ' !; :: d f ; Y ~ ~ ' :
#### § 102-36.95 How long is excess personal property available for screening?

The screening period for excess personal property is normally 21 calendar days. GSA may extend or shorten the screening period in coordination with the holding agency. For screening timeframes for government property in the possession of contractors see the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR part 45).
Use your time for change.

From helping a struggling child to learn to read, 

delivering groceries to an elderly neighbor, to 

supporting a family impacted by natural disaster, 

you can help make a difference in your community.

Choose Community. 

Choose AmeriCorps Seniors.

AmeriCorps.gov/Serve
Use your time for change.

From helping a struggling child to learn to read, 

delivering groceries to an elderly neighbor, to 

supporting a family impacted by natural disaster, 

you can help make a difference in your community.

Choose Community. 

Choose AmeriCorps Seniors.

AmeriCorps.gov/Serve