alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Civ. No. 2226.

Fourth Appellate District.

June 28, 1938.]

#### JEAN GRIFFIN EDDLEMON, Appellant, v. JOEL RICHARD EDDLEMON, Respondent.

Wagy & Hulsy for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

MARKS, J.

This is an appeal from an order awarding the custody of Volene Jo Ann Eddlemon, a minor of the age of seven years, to Sallie Ida Eddlemon, her grandmother.

Volene Jo Ann Eddlemon is the daughter of Jean Griffin Eddlemon and Joel Richard Eddlemon. They were finally divorced on November 5, 1935. The interlocutory decree of divorce gave the custody of the child to the grandmother after a stipulation to that effect by the parents. The final decree of divorce continued this order. Except for the time intervening between February 29, and November 23, 1936, custody of the child has been continued in the grandmother. The record shows that the grandparents have given the child a good home and excellent care.

Based on numerous supporting affidavits, an order to show cause was issued on June 29, 1937, directing the grandmother *344to show cause why the custody of the child should not be awarded to the mother. A hearing was had and on August 24, 1937, the mother was denied custody of her daughter. Custody of the child was continued in the grandmother. This appeal is from that order.

The undisputed evidence shows that the mother was a fit and proper person to have the custody of her daughter, that she was financially able to provide for her and that the home she proposed to provide in Bakersfield, was suitable. There is similar proof of the qualifications and home of the grandmother. We have here a contest between a mother and a grandmother, both of whom desire the custody of the minor, both of whom are fit persons to care for the child and both of whom propose to properly provide and care for her. There was no evidence of abandonment of the child by the mother. While the grandparents largely provided for the support of the child, they did not request any contributions to this support from the mother. The trial court made no finding that the mother was unfit to have the cafe, custody and control of her daughter.

The question here presented has been before our courts in the cases of *Newby*v. *Newby,*55 Cal. App. 114 [202 Pac. 891], and *Stever*v. *Stever,*6 Cal. (2d) 166 [56 Pac. (2d) 1229], in both of which it was held that before a court can take the custody of a minor child under the age of fourteen years away from its parent and place it in a stranger (in the Stever ease, in its grandparents) it must find that the parent seeking custody of the child is unfit to have such custody.

These cases are controlling here. As there is no finding that the mother is unfit to have control of her minor daughter the trial court should not have deprived her of that custody by placing it in the grandmother.

The order is reversed.

Barnard, P. J., concurred.
#### § 101-4.210 Military and merchant marine educational institutions.

These Title IX regulations do not apply to an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for a military service of the United States or for the merchant marine.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63461-63462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25262]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8930]

Overseas Security Advisory Council (Osac) Renewal

    The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the Overseas 
Security Advisory Council. This federal advisory committee will 
continue to interact on overseas security matters of mutual interest 
between the U.S. Government and the American private sector. The 
Council's initiatives and security publications provide a unique 
contribution to protecting American private sector interests abroad. 
The Under Secretary for Management determined that renewal of the 
Charter is necessary and in the public interest.
    The Council consists of representatives from three (3) U.S. 
Government agencies and thirty-one (31) American private sector 
companies

[[Page 63462]]

and organizations. The Council follows the procedures prescribed by the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. Law 92-463). Meetings will 
be open to the public unless a determination is made in accordance with 
Section 10(d) of the FACA and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), that a meeting or a 
portion of the meeting should be closed to the public. Notice of each 
meeting will be provided in the Federal Register at least 15 days prior 
to the meeting.
    For more information contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, Bureau of Diplomatic Security, U.S. Department of 
State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated: September 26, 2014.
Bill A. Miller,
Director of the Diplomatic, Security Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-25262 Filed 10-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
```
§ 102-117.165 What shipping process must I use for freight? Use the following shipping process for freight: ( a ) For domestic shipments you must: ( 1 ) Identify what you are shipping;
( 2 ) Decide if the cargo is HAZMAT, classified, or sensitive that may require special handling or placards;
( 3 ) Decide mode;
( 4 ) Check for applicable contracts or rate tenders within your agency or other agencies, including GSA;
( 5 ) Select the most efficient and economical TSP that gives the best value;
( 6 ) Prepare shipping documents; and
( 7 ) Schedule pickup, declare released value and ensure prompt delivery with a fully executed receipt, and oversee shipment.
( b ) For international shipments you must follow all the domestic procedures and, in addition, comply with the cargo preference laws. For specific information, see subpart D of this part.
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Teliphone Corp., (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to
the best of my knowledge:
  (1)           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  TELIPHONE
CORP.
 By:
      /s/ George MetrakosGeorge
      MetrakosChief
      Executive OfficerDecember
      19, 2008
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Takera Jackson, Plaintiff,

v.

Commissioner of the Social Security 

Administration, Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-23667-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan 

Goodman, consistent with the Clerk’s directive regarding these types of 

administrative appeals (ECF No. 2), for a ruling on all pre-trial, nondispositive 

matters and for a report and recommendation on any dispositive matters. On 

July 24, 2023, Judge Goodman issued a report, recommending that the Court 

deny the Plaintiff’s motion to reopen this matter. (Report & Recommendation,

ECF No. 21.) The Plaintiff has not filed objections to the report, and the time to 

do so has passed.

The Court has considered Judge Goodman’s report, the record, and the 

relevant legal authorities. The Court finds Judge Goodman’s report and 

recommendation cogent and compelling. The Court affirms and adopts Judge 

Goodman’s report and recommendation. (ECF No. 21.) The Court denies the 

Plaintiff’s motion to reopen this matter. (ECF No. 17.) This matter shall remain 

administratively closed during the pendency of the Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration’s remand proceedings. This Court shall retain

jurisdiction of this case and shall not enter a final judgment pursuant to Rule 

58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure until after post-remand proceedings 

are completed, and the Commissioner has filed with the Court any such 

additional and modified findings of fact and decision. Any party may move to 

reopen this case upon the conclusion of the post-remand proceedings. Any 

pending motions are denied as moot.

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on August 9, 2023.

_______________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:22-cv-23667-RNS Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2023 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sonoran Energy, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ending April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Williams, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Andrew Williams

Andrew Williams

Chief Financial Officer



August 13, 2008
We have heard this from several testers on different types of sources. There are filters with different pore sizes

up to 5 um that have acceptable collection efficiency. Th ere are pure Teflon filters (Pall) which are becoming very expensive and there are supported Teflon filters (Tisch) that are less expensive. Also the supported filters come with hygroscopic and hydrophillic supports (Tisch). The hygro scopic filters would absorb water and then may retain SO3 and plug. We have not investigated all th e permutations and combinations.

_________________________________ Ron Myers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policy and Programs Division Monitoring Policy Group, D243-05
RTP NC 27711

Tel. 919.541.5407

Fax 919.541.1039 E-mail myers.ron@epa.gov



### Ron,

I just talked with Jim Serne who’s out on a two week stack test i n Indiana (Jim’s our age). He reports a problem with clogging of the back cellulose filter (after the impinge rs) on 27/28 trains when used to measure PM from uncontrolled oil-fired boilers. Apparently the moist ure condensing on the filter

absorbs SO 2 

### and forms a sulfuric acid mist that clogs the filter and drastical ly increases the pressure

drop.

Art

Arthur S. Werner, Ph.D | Senior Principal Scientist MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. | Research Tria ngle Park, NC

Office 919 474-3588 | Mobile 919 602-5867 | Fax 919 941-0234

Email aswerner@mactec.com | Web www.mactec.com From: "Werner, Arthur" <ASWerner@mactec.com>

To: Ron Myers/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Gray, Walter" <WCGRAY@mactec.com>, "Maret, Michael " <MDMARET@mactec.com>

Date: 01/19/2010 01:50 PM

Subject: OTM 27/28 

### Page 1 of 1

8/26/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4C765433Do

...
#### § 101-39.104 Notice of establishment of a fleet management system.

GSA will inform each affected agency of the time schedule for establishment of a fleet management system and of the agency's responsibility for transferring personnel, motor vehicles, maintenance, storage and service facilities, and other involved property. Arrangements will be made for discussions at the local level between the agencies concerned and the agency responsible for operating the fleet management system in order to work out any problems pertaining to establishing and operating fleet management systems.
Exhibit 10.1 Payment Facilitator Merchant Agreement, signed on October 16, 2019, by NetPay International, Inc. and WorldPay, LLC.


 

 




 

 

 




 

 

 




 

 

 




 

 

 




 

 

 




 

 

 




 

 

 




 

 

 




 

 

 




 

 

	conversion, (i) Provider will be bound by American Express’ then-current Card Acceptance Agreement; and (ii) American Express will set pricing and other fees payable by Provider for Card acceptance.

46.  Employee Non-Solicit.  During the term of this Agreement and for a one year period following any termination of this Agreement, neither party will, either directly or indirectly, on its own behalf or on behalf of its affiliates or others, solicit, divert or hire away, or attempt to solicit, divert or hire away any person who is (or was, at any time during the term of the Agreement or such one year period following) an employee of the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is understood that this employee non-solicitation provision shall not prohibit: (i) solicitation of any person who contacts a soliciting party on his or her own initiative without any solicitation by or encouragement from the soliciting party; (ii) generalized solicitations by advertising and the like which are not directed to specific individuals or employees of the protected party; (iii) solicitations of persons whose employment was previously terminated by the protected party; or (iv) solicitations of persons who have terminated their employment with the protected party without any prior solicitation by the soliciting party.

	 

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Processor and Provider have caused this Agreement to be executed by their authorized officers as of the dates set forth below.


	 

	 

WORLDPAY, LLC

  


	 

	 

By:

	/s/ Brian Kessans


	 

	 

Name:

	Brian Kessans


	 

	 

Title:

	Head of Contract Mgmt


	 

	 

Date:

	10/16/2019  I  19:37 E.D.T.


	 

 

	 

	 


	 

	NETPAY INTERNATIONAL, INC.

  


	 

	 

By:

	/s/ Alon Elbaz,       /s/ Limor Mamon


	 

	 

Name:

	Alon Elbaz,            Limor Mamon


	 

	 

Title:

	CEO,                     CFO


	 

	 

Date:

	7/05/2019




 

 

 

 

 

 

Payment Facilitator Merchant Agreement Page 11 of 23
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Computer-based guidelines forconcrete pavements [electronic resource].**
 
v.1|v.2|v.3|
 
SuDoc Number:A 109.10/4:; TD 2.30:04-122; TD 2.30:04-127

Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001062918

 
July 13, 2018
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.9


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and
each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.




                                                /s/ Paul B. Queally
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Paul B. Queally


                                                February 18, 2004
EXHIBIT 11.1
DUKE-WEEKS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      DECEMBER 31,
                                         1999
                                    ---------------
<S>                                <C>
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
  AVAILABLE FOR COMMON UNITS         $159,447
DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED UNITS           46,808
EARNINGS FROM LAND AND DEPRECIATED
 PROPERTY SALES                       (10,013)
INTEREST EXPENSE                       86,757
                                      -------
   EARNINGS BEFORE FIXED CHARGES     $282,999
                                      =======
INTEREST EXPENSE                     $ 86,757
DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED UNITS           46,808
INTEREST COSTS CAPITALIZED             26,017
                                      -------
   TOTAL FIXED CHARGES               $159,582
                                      =======
FIXED CHARGE RATIO                       1.77
                                         ====
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 15 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: Re: Registration Statement No. 333-123920. Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated November 4, 2005 related to our review of
interim financial information. Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant,
or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act. /s/ KPMG LLP Washington, D.C.
November 4, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Hillary N. Ladov, Esq., Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having considered 

the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

The Motion is GRANTED. Hillary N. Ladov, Esq. may appear and participate in this action 

on behalf of Defendant William Trevor Lawrence. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification 

of all electronic filings to Hillary N. Ladov, at hillary.ladov@mgclaw.com.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at , Florida, this 

day of .

 

United States District Judge

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 64-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5290 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5290

To provide private relief for Salah Idris of Saudi Arabia and El Shifa 
    Pharmaceuticals Industries Company relating to the bombing and 
 destruction of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2000

 Mr. Rohrabacher introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide private relief for Salah Idris of Saudi Arabia and El Shifa 
    Pharmaceuticals Industries Company relating to the bombing and 
 destruction of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Salah Idris of Saudi Arabia and 
to El Shifa Pharmaceuticals Industries Company the sum of $50,000,000 
in full settlement of their claims arising from the bombing and 
destruction of the El Shifa Pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, on 
August 20, 1998, by the Armed Forces of the United States.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS' FEES.

    No part of the amounts appropriated under section 1 in excess of 10 
percent thereof shall be paid or delivered to or received by any agent 
or attorney on account of services rendered in connection with the 
claim referred to in section 1, and the same shall be unlawful, any 
contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person violating the 
provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon 
conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed $1,000.
                                 <all>
```
Union County and the contiguous counties of Benton, Lafayette, Lee, Marshall, Pontotoc, Prentiss, and Tippah in the State of Mississippi constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and tornadoes that occurred on January 3-4, 2000. Applications for loans for physical damage caused by this disaster may be filed until the close of business on March 13, 2000 and for economic injury until the close of business on October 11, 2000 at the address listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308.

The interest rates are: 

### For Physical Damage

Homeowners with credit available elsewhere—7.500% 

Homeowners without credit available elsewhere—3.750% 

Businesses with credit available elsewhere—8.000% 

Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere—4.000% 

Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available elsewhere—6.750% 

### For Economic Injury 

Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere—4.000% 

The numbers assigned to this disaster are 323112 for physical damage and 9G4000 for economic injury.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008.)

Dated: January 11, 2000.

Aida Alvarez, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 00-1518 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P