# Euroopa Liidu C 314/2008

| | ISSN 1725-5171 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 314 |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 51. köide9. detsember 2008 |

ISSN 1725-5171

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 314

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

51. köide9. detsember 2008

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutsioonid, soovitused ja arvamused |
| | ARVAMUSED |
| | Euroopa Keskpank |
| 2008/C 314/01 | Euroopa Keskpanga arvamus, 18. november 2008, Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu taotlusel, seoses ettepanekuga Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi kohta, millega muudetakse direktiivi 94/19/EÜ hoiuste tagamise skeemide kohta seoses hoiuste tagamise ulatuse ja hüvitamise tähtajaga (CON/2008/70) | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

I   Resolutsioonid, soovitused ja arvamused

ARVAMUSED

Euroopa Keskpank

2008/C 314/01

Euroopa Keskpanga arvamus, 18. november 2008, Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu taotlusel, seoses ettepanekuga Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi kohta, millega muudetakse direktiivi 94/19/EÜ hoiuste tagamise skeemide kohta seoses hoiuste tagamise ulatuse ja hüvitamise tähtajaga (CON/2008/70)

1

| | II   Teatised |
| --- | --- |
| | EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDE JA ORGANITE TEATISED |
| | KomisjonEurojust |
| 2008/C 314/02 | Eurojusti ja OLAFi vahelise koostöö korda käsitleva praktilise kokkuleppega seotud teave | 3 |

II   Teatised

EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDE JA ORGANITE TEATISED

KomisjonEurojust

2008/C 314/02

Eurojusti ja OLAFi vahelise koostöö korda käsitleva praktilise kokkuleppega seotud teave

3

| | IV   Teave |
| --- | --- |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT JA ORGANITELT |
| | Komisjon |
| 2008/C 314/03 | Euro vahetuskurss | 8 |
| | TEAVE LIIKMESRIIKIDELT |
| 2008/C 314/04 | Liikmesriikide esitatav teave riigiabi kohta, mida antakse kooskõlas komisjoni määrusega (EÜ) nr 1628/2006, mis käsitleb EÜ asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist investeeringuteks ettenähtud regionaalabi suhtes (
  1
  ) | 9 |

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT JA ORGANITELT

Komisjon

2008/C 314/03

Euro vahetuskurss

8

TEAVE LIIKMESRIIKIDELT

2008/C 314/04

Liikmesriikide esitatav teave riigiabi kohta, mida antakse kooskõlas komisjoni määrusega (EÜ) nr 1628/2006, mis käsitleb EÜ asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist investeeringuteks ettenähtud regionaalabi suhtes (
  1
  )

1

9

| | V   Teated |
| --- | --- |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Komisjon |
| 2008/C 314/05 | Konkursikutse seoses Euroopa Ühenduse teadusuuringute, tehnoloogiaarenduse ja tutvustamistegevuse seitsmenda raamprogrammi tööprogrammiga Võimekus | 11 |
| | ÜHISE KAUBANDUSPOLIITIKA RAKENDAMISEGA SEOTUD MENETLUSED |
| | Komisjon |
| 2008/C 314/06 | Kaebuse 2007/2001 menetlemise kavandatud lõpetamine | 12 |
| | KONKURENTSIPOLIITIKA RAKENDAMISEGA SEOTUD MENETLUSED |
| | Komisjon |
| 2008/C 314/07 | Eelteatis koondumise kohta (Juhtum nr COMP/M.5358 — Arizona/Abieta) (
  1
  ) | 14 |

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Komisjon

2008/C 314/05

Konkursikutse seoses Euroopa Ühenduse teadusuuringute, tehnoloogiaarenduse ja tutvustamistegevuse seitsmenda raamprogrammi tööprogrammiga Võimekus

11

ÜHISE KAUBANDUSPOLIITIKA RAKENDAMISEGA SEOTUD MENETLUSED

Komisjon

2008/C 314/06

Kaebuse 2007/2001 menetlemise kavandatud lõpetamine

12

KONKURENTSIPOLIITIKA RAKENDAMISEGA SEOTUD MENETLUSED

Komisjon

2008/C 314/07

Eelteatis koondumise kohta (Juhtum nr COMP/M.5358 — Arizona/Abieta) (
  1
  )

1

14

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2008/C 314/08 | Märkus lugejale(vt tagakaane sisekülge) | s3 |

2008/C 314/08

Märkus lugejale(vt tagakaane sisekülge)

Märkus lugejale

s3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   EMPs kohaldatav tekst |

---

(1)   EMPs kohaldatav tekst

1

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

I Resolutsioonid, soovitused ja arvamused

ARVAMUSED

Euroopa Keskpank

| 9.12.2008 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 314/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2008

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 314/1

---

EUROOPA KESKPANGA ARVAMUS,

18. november 2008,

Euroopa Liidu Nõukogu taotlusel, seoses ettepanekuga Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi kohta, millega muudetakse direktiivi 94/19/EÜ hoiuste tagamise skeemide kohta seoses hoiuste tagamise ulatuse ja hüvitamise tähtajaga

(CON/2008/70)

(2008/C 314/01)

Sissejuhatus ja õiguslik alus

24. oktoobril 2008. aastal sai Euroopa Keskpank (EKP) Euroopa Liidu Nõukogult taotluse avaldada arvamust seoses ettepanekuga Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu direktiivi kohta, millega muudetakse direktiivi 94/19/EÜ hoiuste tagamise skeemide kohta seoses hoiuste tagamise ulatuse ja hüvitamise tähtajaga (1) (edaspidi „ettepanek direktiivi kohta”).

EKP arvamuse andmise pädevus seoses ettepandud direktiiviga põhineb Euroopa Ühenduse asutamislepingu artikli 105 lõikel 4. Euroopa Keskpanga nõukogu on käesoleva arvamuse vastu võtnud kooskõlas Euroopa Keskpanga kodukorra artikli 17.5 esimese lausega.

1.   Üldised märkused

| 1.1 | EKP möönab, et finantsturu kriisi hetkeolukord on kinnitanud hoiuste tagamise korra olulisust hoiustajate usalduse säilitamisel ning seeläbi finantsstabiilsuse tagamisel. EKP toetab hoiustajate usalduse suurendamise eesmärki ja märgib, et kiireloomulisuse tõttu keskendub ettepandud direktiiv hoiuste hõlmatuse määra suurendamisele riikide hoiuste tagamise skeemides (edaspidi „riigisisesed skeemid”) kooskõlas majandus- ja rahandusministrite nõukogu (Council of Economic and Financial Ministers, ECOFIN) 7. oktoobri 2008. aasta järeldustega (2), mille kohaselt tuleb lühendada väljamaksete viivitust ja lõpetada omavastutus. |
| --- | --- |

1.1

EKP möönab, et finantsturu kriisi hetkeolukord on kinnitanud hoiuste tagamise korra olulisust hoiustajate usalduse säilitamisel ning seeläbi finantsstabiilsuse tagamisel. EKP toetab hoiustajate usalduse suurendamise eesmärki ja märgib, et kiireloomulisuse tõttu keskendub ettepandud direktiiv hoiuste hõlmatuse määra suurendamisele riikide hoiuste tagamise skeemides (edaspidi „riigisisesed skeemid”) kooskõlas majandus- ja rahandusministrite nõukogu (Council of Economic and Financial Ministers, ECOFIN) 7. oktoobri 2008. aasta järeldustega (2), mille kohaselt tuleb lühendada väljamaksete viivitust ja lõpetada omavastutus.

| 1.2 | EKP toetab ka komisjoni kavatsust jätkata tööd riigisiseste skeemide lähendamisel, eelkõige seoses nende rahastamismeetoditega, ning esitada vastav aruanne Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule 31. detsembriks 2009 (3). Võttes arvesse riigisiseste skeemide rahastamiskorralduse olulisust finantsturvavõrgu tulemuslikkuse ja finantsstabiilsuse tagamise jaoks, soovib EKP anda oma panuse komisjoni tulevases seda valdkonda käsitlevas töös ning toetab komisjoni aruande õigeaegset lõpetamist. Selles suhtes rõhutab EKP, et riigisiseste skeemide rahastamiskorraldus peab muuhulgas olema kooskõlas asutamislepingus sätestatud keskpankade laenukeeluga, eelkõige riikide keskpankadele keelatud arvelduskrediitide võimaluse või mis tahes muu võimaluse andmine asutamislepingu artikli 101 tähenduses (4), mida on käsitletud ka EKP arvamustes riikide õigusaktide kohta (5) ja EKP lähenemisaruannetes (6). |
| --- | --- |

1.2

EKP toetab ka komisjoni kavatsust jätkata tööd riigisiseste skeemide lähendamisel, eelkõige seoses nende rahastamismeetoditega, ning esitada vastav aruanne Euroopa Parlamendile ja nõukogule 31. detsembriks 2009 (3). Võttes arvesse riigisiseste skeemide rahastamiskorralduse olulisust finantsturvavõrgu tulemuslikkuse ja finantsstabiilsuse tagamise jaoks, soovib EKP anda oma panuse komisjoni tulevases seda valdkonda käsitlevas töös ning toetab komisjoni aruande õigeaegset lõpetamist. Selles suhtes rõhutab EKP, et riigisiseste skeemide rahastamiskorraldus peab muuhulgas olema kooskõlas asutamislepingus sätestatud keskpankade laenukeeluga, eelkõige riikide keskpankadele keelatud arvelduskrediitide võimaluse või mis tahes muu võimaluse andmine asutamislepingu artikli 101 tähenduses (4), mida on käsitletud ka EKP arvamustes riikide õigusaktide kohta (5) ja EKP lähenemisaruannetes (6).

2.   Konkreetsed märkused

2.1   Tagatise määr

EKP toetab tagatise miinimummäära tõstmist 50 000 EUR 2008. aasta lõpuks ja selle edasist suurendamist 100 000 EUR (7), nagu osutatud nõukogu 7. oktoobri 2008. aasta järeldustes (8). Samas rõhutab EKP, et tagatise määra mis tahes tõstmisele üle eespool osutatud summa peaks eelnema ELi tasandil tihe koordineerimine, kuna riigisiseste meetmete olulised erinevused võivad viia soovimatu tulemuseni ja tekitada ühtse turu moonutusi.

2.2   Hüvitamistähtaja lühendamine

EKP toetab kavatsust oluliselt lühendada tagatud hoiuste hüvitamise tähtaega, millega suurendatakse hoiustajate usaldust (9). Sellega seoses soovib EKP rõhutada, et äsjane rahvusvaheliselt teostatud analüüs tõi välja, et hoiustajate nõuete viivitamata väljamaksmine on tulemusliku hoiuste kaitse jaoks keskse tähtsusega. Samas tuleks viivituse vajalikule vähendamisele läheneda praktiliselt, siiski säilitades hoiuste tagamise süsteemi usaldusväärsust. Sellest tuleneb tulemusliku menetluse vajadus nõuete kontrollimiseks ja hoiustajatele väljamakseteks ning samuti vajadus tagada piisava rahastamise kättesaadavus. Eelkõige tuleb sisse viia kord piiriüleselt tegutseva panga maksejõuetuse juhtudeks, et hoiustajad saaksid hüvitise sama tõhusalt, kui ühes liikmesriigis tegutseva panga puhul. Lisaks soovitab EKP komisjonil hinnata, kas on vajalik riigisiseste skeemide rahastamiseks kasutatavate korralduste täiendav harmoneerimine, millega kaasneks hüvitamise korralduste tulemuslikkuse analüüs. Lõpuks, lisaks hüvitamise ajavahemiku lühendamisele soovitab EKP suurendada avalikkuse usaldust hoiuste tagamise skeemide vastu, tõstes hoiustajate teadlikkust hoiuste kaitse tingimustest, mille hulka kuuluks ka krediidiasutuste tingimuste kohane avaldamine.

Frankfurt Maini ääres, 18. november 2008

EKP president

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---

(1)  KOM(2008) 661 (lõplik).

1

(2)  Vt nõukogu 2894. istungi (13784/08) pressiteadet, mis on avaldatud nõukogu kodulehel www.consilium.europa.eu; direktiivi kohta tehtud ettepaneku seletuskirja 1. jao punkt 6.

2

(3)  Direktiivi 94/19/EÜ artikkel 12, mida muudetakse ettepandud direktiivi artikli 1 lõikega 6; vrd ettepandud direktiivi põhjendused 1 ja 7.

3

(4)  Tõlgendatakse kooskõlas nõukogu 13. detsembri 1993. aasta määrusega (EÜ) nr 3603/93 asutamislepingu artiklis 104 ja artikli 104b lõikes 1 nimetatud keeldude kohaldamiseks vajalike määratluste täpsustamise kohta (EÜT L 332, 31.12.1993, lk 1).

4

(5)  Vt EKP 11. oktoobri 2001. aasta arvamuse CON/2001/32 (Portugali rahandusministeeriumi taotlusel, krediidiasutuste ja finantsettevõtete õigusraamistiku muutmise määruse eelnõu kohta) punktid 11 kuni 14; EKP 1. detsembri 2005. aasta arvamuse CON/2005/50 (Slovakkia keskpanga taotlusel, pangahoiustekaitse seaduse nr 118/1996 (Coll.) muutmise seaduse ja muude seaduste muutmise kohta) punktid 11 kuni 13; EKP 27. augusti 2007. aasta arvamuse CON/2007/26 (Poola rahandusministri taotlusel, pangagarantiifondi seaduse muutmise seaduse kohta) punktid 2.1 kuni 2.3; ja EKP 17. jaanuari 2008. aasta arvamuse CON/2008/5 (Poola rahandusministri taotlusel, pangagarantiifondi seaduse muutmise seaduse kohta) punktid 2.2 kuni 2.8.

5

(6)  Vt näiteks EKP lähenemisaruanne, detsember 2006, lk 30.

6

(7)  Direktiivi 94/19/EÜ artikli 7 lõige 1, mida muudetakse ettepandud direktiivi artikli 1 lõike 3 punktiga a ja täiendatakse ettepandud direktiivi artikli 2 lõike 1 esimese ja teise lõiguga, mis sätestab tagatise suurendatud määra tagasiulatuva kohaldamise alates 15. oktoobrist 2008; vrd ettepandud direktiivi põhjendus 3 ja direktiivi kohta tehtud ettepaneku seletuskirja punkt 5.3.

7

(8)  Nõukogu leppis kokku, et „kõik liikmesriigid tagavad algselt vähemalt ühe aasta jooksul hoiuste hüvitamise üksikisikutele vähemalt 50 000 EUR ulatuses, tunnustades et paljud liikmesriigid otsustavad tõsta oma piirmäära 100 000 EUR”.

8

(9)  Direktiivi 94/19/EÜ artikli 1 lõige 3, mida muudetakse ettepandud direktiivi artikli 1 lõikega 1, ning direktiivi 94/19/EÜ artikli 10 lõiked 1 ja 2, mida muudetakse ettepandud direktiivi artikli 1 lõikega 5; vrd ettepandud direktiivi põhjendus 5 ja direktiivi kohta tehtud ettepaneku seletuskirja punkt 5.1.

9

---

II Teatised

EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDE JA ORGANITE TEATISED

Komisjon Eurojust

| 9.12.2008 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 314/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2008

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 314/3

---

Eurojusti ja OLAFi vahelise koostöö korda käsitleva praktilise kokkuleppega seotud teave

(2008/C 314/02)

Euroopa õigusalase koostööga tegelev asutus Eurojust ja Euroopa Pettusevastane Amet (OLAF) allkirjastasid 24. septembril 2008 praktilise kokkuleppe, mis käsitleb paremat kooskõlastatust ja koostööd finantspettuste ja korruptsiooni ning mis tahes Euroopa Ühenduse finantshuve kahjustavate kuritegude vastase võitluse korral. Praktilise kokkuleppega kehtestatakse koostöö tihendamise ja tõhustamise kord ning üld- ja isikuandmete vahetamist käsitlevad sätted. Nõukogu kiitis kokkuleppe heaks 25. juulil 2008.

---

LISA

Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation between Eurojust and OLAF

EUROJUST AND OLAF,

Hereinafter referred to as „the Parties”,

Having regard to the Council Decision of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust and the Commission Decision of 28 April 1999 establishing the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) as well as Regulations (EC) No 1073/1999 and (Euratom) No 1074/1999 and the tasks, objectives and responsibilities assigned to Eurojust and OLAF in the fight against fraud, corruption and any other criminal offence or illegal activity adversely affecting the European Communities' financial interests;

Having regard to the opinion of the Joint Supervisory Body of Eurojust of 26 April 2007, re-iterated on 24 April 2008;

After consulting the European Data Protection Supervisor;

Considering that Article 26(3) of the Council Decision setting up Eurojust stipulates that Eurojust shall establish and maintain close co-operation with OLAF;

Considering Articles 26(4) and 27 of the Council Decision setting up Eurojust explicitly dealing with the exchange of information;

Considering the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on Joint Investigation Teams as well as Article 13 of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union of 2000 and in particular the provision for the setting up of Joint Investigation Teams;

Considering that both Parties have adequate rules in place regarding the protection of personal data;

Considering that it is within the common interest of Eurojust and OLAF to enhance their co-operation, in an effort to make the fight against fraud, corruption and any other criminal offence or illegal activity adversely affecting the European Communities' financial interests as efficient as possible and to avoid duplication of effort wherever possible,

HAVE AGREED:

CHAPTER 1

DEFINITIONS AND PURPOSE OF THE PRACTICAL AGREEMENT ON ARRANGEMENTS OF COOPERATION

Point 1

Definitions

For the purpose of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation:

| 1. | „Eurojust Decision” means the Council Decision of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

„Eurojust Decision” means the Council Decision of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (1);

| 2. | „Rules of Procedure of Eurojust” means the Rules of Procedure of Eurojust (2); |
| --- | --- |

2.

„Rules of Procedure of Eurojust” means the Rules of Procedure of Eurojust (2);

| 3. | „Eurojust” means the unit set up by the Eurojust Decision; |
| --- | --- |

3.

„Eurojust” means the unit set up by the Eurojust Decision;

| 4. | „OLAF” means the European Anti-Fraud Office established by the Commission Decision of 28 April 1999 (3), carrying out the administrative investigation tasks set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 (4) and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (5); |
| --- | --- |

4.

„OLAF” means the European Anti-Fraud Office established by the Commission Decision of 28 April 1999 (3), carrying out the administrative investigation tasks set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 (4) and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (5);

| 5. | „President of the College” means the President as elected by the College, as referred to in Article 28 of the Eurojust Decision; |
| --- | --- |

5.

„President of the College” means the President as elected by the College, as referred to in Article 28 of the Eurojust Decision;

| 6. | „Director of OLAF” means the Director, as referred to in Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 and Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999; |
| --- | --- |

6.

„Director of OLAF” means the Director, as referred to in Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 and Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999;

| 7. | „College” means the College of Eurojust, as referred to in Article 10 of the Eurojust Decision; |
| --- | --- |

7.

„College” means the College of Eurojust, as referred to in Article 10 of the Eurojust Decision;

| 8. | „Eurojust National Member” means the national member seconded to Eurojust by each Member State, as referred to in Article 2(1) of the Eurojust Decision; |
| --- | --- |

8.

„Eurojust National Member” means the national member seconded to Eurojust by each Member State, as referred to in Article 2(1) of the Eurojust Decision;

| 9. | „Assistant” means a person who may assist each Eurojust National Member, as referred to in Article 2(2) of the Eurojust Decision, unless defined otherwise in this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation; |
| --- | --- |

9.

„Assistant” means a person who may assist each Eurojust National Member, as referred to in Article 2(2) of the Eurojust Decision, unless defined otherwise in this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation;

| 10. | „Administrative Director” means the Administrative Director as referred to in Article 29 of the Eurojust Decision; |
| --- | --- |

10.

„Administrative Director” means the Administrative Director as referred to in Article 29 of the Eurojust Decision;

| 11. | „Eurojust Staff” means the staff referred to in Article 30 of the Eurojust Decision; |
| --- | --- |

11.

„Eurojust Staff” means the staff referred to in Article 30 of the Eurojust Decision;

| 12. | „Competent OLAF Unit” means the unit within OLAF, whose tasks comprise, amongst others, liaising with national judicial authorities; |
| --- | --- |

12.

„Competent OLAF Unit” means the unit within OLAF, whose tasks comprise, amongst others, liaising with national judicial authorities;

| 13. | „OLAF Staff” means staff as referred to in Article 6(1) of Commission Decision 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom establishing the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF); |
| --- | --- |

13.

„OLAF Staff” means staff as referred to in Article 6(1) of Commission Decision 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom establishing the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF);

| 14. | „Data Protection Provisions” means, within Eurojust, the applicable data protection rules as laid down in the Eurojust Decision and the Rules of Procedure on the Processing and Protection of Personal Data at Eurojust (6), and, within OLAF, the Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (7); |
| --- | --- |

14.

„Data Protection Provisions” means, within Eurojust, the applicable data protection rules as laid down in the Eurojust Decision and the Rules of Procedure on the Processing and Protection of Personal Data at Eurojust (6), and, within OLAF, the Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (7);

| 15. | „Personal Data” means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person: an identifiable person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identification number or to one or more factors specific to his physical, physiological, mental, economic, cultural or social identity; |
| --- | --- |

15.

„Personal Data” means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person: an identifiable person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identification number or to one or more factors specific to his physical, physiological, mental, economic, cultural or social identity;

| 16. | „Processing” of Personal Data means any operation or set of operations which are performed upon Personal Data, whether or not by automatic means, such as collection, recording, organisation, storage, adaptation or alteration, retrieval, consultation, use, disclosure by transmission, dissemination or otherwise making available, alignment or combination, blocking, erasure or destruction; |
| --- | --- |

16.

„Processing” of Personal Data means any operation or set of operations which are performed upon Personal Data, whether or not by automatic means, such as collection, recording, organisation, storage, adaptation or alteration, retrieval, consultation, use, disclosure by transmission, dissemination or otherwise making available, alignment or combination, blocking, erasure or destruction;

| 17. | „Case Summary” means general information on a case dealt with either by Eurojust or OLAF and describing the main features of elements of the case, but without containing any Personal Data; |
| --- | --- |

17.

„Case Summary” means general information on a case dealt with either by Eurojust or OLAF and describing the main features of elements of the case, but without containing any Personal Data;

| 18. | „Joint Investigation Team” means a Joint Investigation Team, as referred to in Article 13 of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (8) and in the Framework Decision 2002/465/JHA on Joint Investigation Teams (9). |
| --- | --- |

18.

„Joint Investigation Team” means a Joint Investigation Team, as referred to in Article 13 of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (8) and in the Framework Decision 2002/465/JHA on Joint Investigation Teams (9).

Point 2

Purpose of the Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation

| 1. | The purpose of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation is to enhance the fight against fraud, corruption or any other criminal offence or illegal activities affecting the European Communities' financial interests and to define to this end the modalities for a close co-operation between the Parties. The co-operation will take place with due regard to transparency, complementarity of tasks and coordination of efforts. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The purpose of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation is to enhance the fight against fraud, corruption or any other criminal offence or illegal activities affecting the European Communities' financial interests and to define to this end the modalities for a close co-operation between the Parties. The co-operation will take place with due regard to transparency, complementarity of tasks and coordination of efforts.

| 2. | This Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation does not modify any relevant legal rules and does not interfere with or amend the legal framework governing Eurojust or OLAF. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation does not modify any relevant legal rules and does not interfere with or amend the legal framework governing Eurojust or OLAF.

CHAPTER 2

CO-OPERATION

Point 3

Regular contacts and co-operation

| 1. | The Parties will maintain close and regular contacts. To this end, they will set up teams consisting for Eurojust of designated Eurojust National Members and/or their Assistants and for OLAF of the Competent OLAF Unit. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Parties will maintain close and regular contacts. To this end, they will set up teams consisting for Eurojust of designated Eurojust National Members and/or their Assistants and for OLAF of the Competent OLAF Unit.

| 2. | The teams will meet regularly, at least quarterly. The meetings will be chaired by a representative of each Party in rotation, on the basis of an agenda agreed on beforehand. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The teams will meet regularly, at least quarterly. The meetings will be chaired by a representative of each Party in rotation, on the basis of an agenda agreed on beforehand.

| 3. | The teams will exchange Case Summaries in accordance with Point 5 and provide general feedback on the progress made and the activities performed in cases exchanged between the Parties with a view to reinforcing, if necessary, the co-operation. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The teams will exchange Case Summaries in accordance with Point 5 and provide general feedback on the progress made and the activities performed in cases exchanged between the Parties with a view to reinforcing, if necessary, the co-operation.

| 4. | Moreover, the meetings and further contacts between the teams are intended






  (a) | to reinforce common strategies on cases and to resolve practical problems in the co-operation which may arise from the application of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation; |
| --- | --- | --- |

4.

Moreover, the meetings and further contacts between the teams are intended

(a)

to reinforce common strategies on cases and to resolve practical problems in the co-operation which may arise from the application of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation;

| (b) | to consult on matters of common interest in order to allow the Parties to achieve their respective objectives and co-ordinate their activities; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

to consult on matters of common interest in order to allow the Parties to achieve their respective objectives and co-ordinate their activities;

| (c) | to support the development of priorities and strategies which are complementary to each other having regard to the priorities established in accordance with the respective legal framework of both Parties and the overall objective of enhancing the fight against fraud, corruption or any other criminal offence or illegal activities affecting the European Communities' financial interests within their respective competences; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

to support the development of priorities and strategies which are complementary to each other having regard to the priorities established in accordance with the respective legal framework of both Parties and the overall objective of enhancing the fight against fraud, corruption or any other criminal offence or illegal activities affecting the European Communities' financial interests within their respective competences;

| (d) | to identify individual or joint activities, if any, that need to be taken thereafter with a view to a more efficient and better use of the resources of the Parties; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

to identify individual or joint activities, if any, that need to be taken thereafter with a view to a more efficient and better use of the resources of the Parties;

| (e) | to help in coordinating the Parties' support and assistance of the national judicial authorities and of the authorities in charge of investigations and prosecutions. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

to help in coordinating the Parties' support and assistance of the national judicial authorities and of the authorities in charge of investigations and prosecutions.

| 5. | If necessary to improve co-operation, the teams may invite other Eurojust National Member(s), their Assistants and/or Eurojust and OLAF Staff to take part in a meeting. |
| --- | --- |

5.

If necessary to improve co-operation, the teams may invite other Eurojust National Member(s), their Assistants and/or Eurojust and OLAF Staff to take part in a meeting.

| 6. | The designation of teams does not have any effect on direct contacts of OLAF Staff responsible for a specific case with one or more of the Eurojust National Members concerned and vice versa. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The designation of teams does not have any effect on direct contacts of OLAF Staff responsible for a specific case with one or more of the Eurojust National Members concerned and vice versa.

Point 4

General rules on operational co-operation

| 1. | The Parties may collaborate in accordance with their respective competences and tasks either at the request of OLAF or on the initiative of Eurojust. This collaboration includes in particular the exchange of Case Summaries with a view to identifying appropriate cases requiring co-operation in accordance with Point 5, the exchange of operational information in accordance with Point 6, the participation in operational meetings in accordance with Point 8 and the provision of such mutual assistance and advice as may be useful to the Parties for the efficient and effective fulfilment of their respective tasks. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Parties may collaborate in accordance with their respective competences and tasks either at the request of OLAF or on the initiative of Eurojust. This collaboration includes in particular the exchange of Case Summaries with a view to identifying appropriate cases requiring co-operation in accordance with Point 5, the exchange of operational information in accordance with Point 6, the participation in operational meetings in accordance with Point 8 and the provision of such mutual assistance and advice as may be useful to the Parties for the efficient and effective fulfilment of their respective tasks.

| 2. | Before taking up collaboration with OLAF on a case concerning the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, Eurojust will verify in accordance with Article 26(3) of the Eurojust Decision that the competent authorities of the Member States concerned do not oppose the collaboration in such case. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Before taking up collaboration with OLAF on a case concerning the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, Eurojust will verify in accordance with Article 26(3) of the Eurojust Decision that the competent authorities of the Member States concerned do not oppose the collaboration in such case.

| 3. | Unless otherwise specified in this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation, collaboration and any kind of communication will take place directly between the person(s) or, as the case may be, the College in charge of the case.
  To this end, the Parties will promptly inform each other after having taken up collaboration of the competent person(s) or, as the case may be, the College in charge of the case and his/her/their contact details. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Unless otherwise specified in this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation, collaboration and any kind of communication will take place directly between the person(s) or, as the case may be, the College in charge of the case.

To this end, the Parties will promptly inform each other after having taken up collaboration of the competent person(s) or, as the case may be, the College in charge of the case and his/her/their contact details.

| 4. | The Parties will inform each other of any action taken, responses received or other relevant developments or encountered difficulties in cases where they collaborate. This includes information on the decision to close or not to pursue a specific case. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Parties will inform each other of any action taken, responses received or other relevant developments or encountered difficulties in cases where they collaborate. This includes information on the decision to close or not to pursue a specific case.

Point 5

Exchange of Case Summaries

| 1. | With a view to identifying appropriate cases for collaboration, the Parties will inform each other as soon as possible via the transmission of Case Summaries of the existence of any case dealt with under their respective competences where:






  — | in respect of Eurojust, it appears that the case is related to fraud, corruption or any criminal offence affecting the European Communities' financial interests, |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

With a view to identifying appropriate cases for collaboration, the Parties will inform each other as soon as possible via the transmission of Case Summaries of the existence of any case dealt with under their respective competences where:

—

in respect of Eurojust, it appears that the case is related to fraud, corruption or any criminal offence affecting the European Communities' financial interests,

| — | in respect of OLAF, it appears that the case directly involves judicial co-operation between the competent national authorities of two or more Member States, or where the case concerns a Member State and the Community. |
| --- | --- |

—

in respect of OLAF, it appears that the case directly involves judicial co-operation between the competent national authorities of two or more Member States, or where the case concerns a Member State and the Community.

Unless otherwise stated when transmitting the Case Summary, the transmission of a Case Summary constitutes a request to the other Party (requested Party) to examine the necessity for close co-operation on a specific case.

| 2. | As soon as the requested Party has decided that a specific case, for which a Case Summary was transmitted, requires co-operation:






  — | in respect of Eurojust, the College and/or the National Member(s) concerned, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

As soon as the requested Party has decided that a specific case, for which a Case Summary was transmitted, requires co-operation:

—

in respect of Eurojust, the College and/or the National Member(s) concerned,

| — | in respect of OLAF, the Competent OLAF unit and/or the Director of OLAF and/or the OLAF Staff member responsible for the case |
| --- | --- |

—

in respect of OLAF, the Competent OLAF unit and/or the Director of OLAF and/or the OLAF Staff member responsible for the case

will inform the other Party of this decision without undue delay.

Information will also be provided when the requested Party decides that a case is not appropriate for co-operation.

| 3. | Nothing prevents one Party from directly requesting the other Party to collaborate in a specific case without exchanging Case Summaries beforehand. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Nothing prevents one Party from directly requesting the other Party to collaborate in a specific case without exchanging Case Summaries beforehand.

Point 6

Exchange of case-related information

| 1. | When collaborating on a specific case, the Parties will exchange any necessary information, including personal data, in order to achieve the purpose of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation as set forth in Point 2. Any exchange of information takes place within the limits of their respective competences and as far as allowed under their respective legal framework and this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

When collaborating on a specific case, the Parties will exchange any necessary information, including personal data, in order to achieve the purpose of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation as set forth in Point 2. Any exchange of information takes place within the limits of their respective competences and as far as allowed under their respective legal framework and this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation.

| 2. | The Requesting Party will notify the other Party of the purpose for which the information is requested. In the case of a spontaneous transfer of information, the Party providing information will notify the other Party of the purpose for which the information is supplied. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Requesting Party will notify the other Party of the purpose for which the information is requested. In the case of a spontaneous transfer of information, the Party providing information will notify the other Party of the purpose for which the information is supplied.

| 3. | Personal Data transmitted from OLAF to Eurojust will be transmitted:






  — | directly to the College, when the case falls within the competence of the College, or |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

Personal Data transmitted from OLAF to Eurojust will be transmitted:

—

directly to the College, when the case falls within the competence of the College, or

| — | directly to the Eurojust National Member(s) concerned, when the case falls within the competence of one or more of the Eurojust National Members. |
| --- | --- |

—

directly to the Eurojust National Member(s) concerned, when the case falls within the competence of one or more of the Eurojust National Members.

| 4. | The respective Eurojust National Member(s) concerned with a case may transmit personal data to OLAF. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The respective Eurojust National Member(s) concerned with a case may transmit personal data to OLAF.

| 5. | Information not containing Personal Data can be exchanged between the Parties also via other channels, in particular via the teams. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Information not containing Personal Data can be exchanged between the Parties also via other channels, in particular via the teams.

Point 7

Exchange of strategic information

Within the limits of their respective competences, the Parties will exchange strategic information necessary for the accomplishment of the missions of each Party, either spontaneously or on specific request. Strategic information may include:

| — | trends in criminality related to fraud, corruption or any other illegal activities affecting the European Communities' financial interests, |
| --- | --- |

—

trends in criminality related to fraud, corruption or any other illegal activities affecting the European Communities' financial interests,

| — | operational structures of the organisations implicated in these activities, as well as the links existing between these organisations operating inside or outside the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

operational structures of the organisations implicated in these activities, as well as the links existing between these organisations operating inside or outside the European Union,

| — | strategies, modus operandi, techniques and the financing of these organisations. |
| --- | --- |

—

strategies, modus operandi, techniques and the financing of these organisations.

Point 8

Operational and strategic meetings

| 1. | When operational meetings, organised by Eurojust, deal with cases the purpose of which is to co-ordinate investigations and prosecutions regarding the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, the participation of OLAF will, at the initiative of the Eurojust National Members concerned, be at the invitation of the President of the College. |
| --- | --- |

1.

When operational meetings, organised by Eurojust, deal with cases the purpose of which is to co-ordinate investigations and prosecutions regarding the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, the participation of OLAF will, at the initiative of the Eurojust National Members concerned, be at the invitation of the President of the College.

| 2. | OLAF may also participate in strategic meetings, organised by Eurojust, dealing with the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, at the invitation of the President of the College and with the approval of the Eurojust National Members concerned. |
| --- | --- |

2.

OLAF may also participate in strategic meetings, organised by Eurojust, dealing with the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, at the invitation of the President of the College and with the approval of the Eurojust National Members concerned.

| 3. | OLAF may also be invited by the President of the College to participate in operational and strategic meetings on its own request provided that the competent national authorities concerned do not oppose such participation. |
| --- | --- |

3.

OLAF may also be invited by the President of the College to participate in operational and strategic meetings on its own request provided that the competent national authorities concerned do not oppose such participation.

| 4. | Eurojust National Members and their Assistants, the Administrative Director, Eurojust Staff and, where appropriate, Liaison Magistrates and Liaison Prosecutors at Eurojust may also attend meetings organised by OLAF at the invitation of OLAF. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Eurojust National Members and their Assistants, the Administrative Director, Eurojust Staff and, where appropriate, Liaison Magistrates and Liaison Prosecutors at Eurojust may also attend meetings organised by OLAF at the invitation of OLAF.

Point 9

Joint Investigation Teams

| 1. | If either Eurojust or OLAF participates in a Joint Investigation Team set up by the Member States related to fraud, corruption or any criminal offence affecting the European Communities' financial interests, the Party will, when appropriate, inform the other Party and propose to the Member States to consider inviting the other Party to participate in the Joint Investigation Team. |
| --- | --- |

1.

If either Eurojust or OLAF participates in a Joint Investigation Team set up by the Member States related to fraud, corruption or any criminal offence affecting the European Communities' financial interests, the Party will, when appropriate, inform the other Party and propose to the Member States to consider inviting the other Party to participate in the Joint Investigation Team.

| 2. | The Parties may assist the Member States in the setting up of the Joint Investigation Team. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Parties may assist the Member States in the setting up of the Joint Investigation Team.

| 3. | Eurojust and OLAF, acting separately or together, may recommend to the national authorities of the Member States the setting up of Joint Investigation Teams when the information they possess shows the usefulness of doing so. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Eurojust and OLAF, acting separately or together, may recommend to the national authorities of the Member States the setting up of Joint Investigation Teams when the information they possess shows the usefulness of doing so.

Point 10

Co-operation in the field of professional training, seminars and workshops

The Parties will co-operate in the field of professional training, seminars and workshops:

| — | by informing each other of relevant activities which they organise and which may be of common interest, and, when appropriate, by inviting each other to these activities, |
| --- | --- |

—

by informing each other of relevant activities which they organise and which may be of common interest, and, when appropriate, by inviting each other to these activities,

| — | by organising joint activities in this field. |
| --- | --- |

—

by organising joint activities in this field.

CHAPTER 3

PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA

Point 11

General principles

| 1. | The transmission of Personal Data between the Parties and their Processing will take place in accordance with:






  — | in respect of Eurojust, the Eurojust Decision and the Rules of Procedure on the Processing and Protection of Personal Data at Eurojust, |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

The transmission of Personal Data between the Parties and their Processing will take place in accordance with:

—

in respect of Eurojust, the Eurojust Decision and the Rules of Procedure on the Processing and Protection of Personal Data at Eurojust,

| — | in respect of OLAF, Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of Personal Data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data. |
| --- | --- |

—

in respect of OLAF, Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of Personal Data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data.

| 2. | When transmitting the information, the Party may notify the other Party of any restriction on the use of the provided information. This includes possible access restrictions, restrictions on transmission to the competent authorities of the Member States and terms for deletion or destruction. Notification may also be given at a later stage, when the need for such restrictions becomes apparent after the transfer. |
| --- | --- |

2.

When transmitting the information, the Party may notify the other Party of any restriction on the use of the provided information. This includes possible access restrictions, restrictions on transmission to the competent authorities of the Member States and terms for deletion or destruction. Notification may also be given at a later stage, when the need for such restrictions becomes apparent after the transfer.

| 3. | As far as allowed under the respective legal frameworks, the Parties may further process information obtained from the other Party under this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation for the purpose of achieving the objectives of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation as set forth in Point 2. |
| --- | --- |

3.

As far as allowed under the respective legal frameworks, the Parties may further process information obtained from the other Party under this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation for the purpose of achieving the objectives of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation as set forth in Point 2.

Point 12

Documentation

Each Party will maintain a record of the transmission and receipt of Personal Data communicated to the other Party under this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation.

Point 13

Data security

The Parties will inform each other of the technical measures and organisational arrangements, which they have taken in accordance with the respective law applicable to the Parties, to protect Personal Data against accidental or unlawful destruction, accidental loss or unauthorised disclosure, alteration, access or any unauthorised form of Processing. The Parties in particular ensure that only those authorised to access Personal Data can have access to such data.

Point 14

Rights of data subjects

The transmitting Party will be consulted by the other Party before it takes a final decision on the request by an individual to have access to, and to request the correction, blocking or deletion of, Personal Data concerning him transmitted under this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation, in accordance with the applicable Data Protection Provisions of the Party to which the request is addressed.

Point 15

Correction and deletion of information

| 1. | Each Party will immediately inform the other Party in all cases where information which has been transmitted to or received from that Party is corrected or deleted, stating the reasons. It will also inform the other Party in cases where it emerges that the information should not have been transmitted. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Each Party will immediately inform the other Party in all cases where information which has been transmitted to or received from that Party is corrected or deleted, stating the reasons. It will also inform the other Party in cases where it emerges that the information should not have been transmitted.

| 2. | When the transmitting Party informs the receiving Party that it has corrected or deleted information previously transmitted, or that the information should not have been transmitted, the receiving Party will correct or delete the information accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

2.

When the transmitting Party informs the receiving Party that it has corrected or deleted information previously transmitted, or that the information should not have been transmitted, the receiving Party will correct or delete the information accordingly.

| 3. | When a Party has reason to assume that information received from the other Party is not accurate, or no longer up to date, it will inform the other Party. This Party will verify the data and inform the other Party of the outcome of such verification. |
| --- | --- |

3.

When a Party has reason to assume that information received from the other Party is not accurate, or no longer up to date, it will inform the other Party. This Party will verify the data and inform the other Party of the outcome of such verification.

| 4. | In cases where Personal Data received from a Party and transmitted onward to a third party is corrected or deleted afterwards, the onward transmitting Party will inform that third party thereof. |
| --- | --- |

4.

In cases where Personal Data received from a Party and transmitted onward to a third party is corrected or deleted afterwards, the onward transmitting Party will inform that third party thereof.

Point 16

Time limits for the storage of Personal Data

Personal Data will be stored in accordance with the respective laws applicable to the Parties.

CHAPTER 4

FINAL PROVISIONS

Point 17

Evaluation of co-operation

| 1. | During the meetings of the teams set out in Point 3, the Parties will evaluate periodically the application of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation and the necessity for amendments. |
| --- | --- |

1.

During the meetings of the teams set out in Point 3, the Parties will evaluate periodically the application of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation and the necessity for amendments.

| 2. | The President of Eurojust and the Director of OLAF, or their nominees, will consult each other regularly on the application of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation. They will meet at least once a year to oversee the evaluation process conducted by the teams. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The President of Eurojust and the Director of OLAF, or their nominees, will consult each other regularly on the application of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation. They will meet at least once a year to oversee the evaluation process conducted by the teams.

| 3. | The Parties will provide information on their collaboration in their respective annual reports. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Parties will provide information on their collaboration in their respective annual reports.

Point 18

Amendments

| 1. | This Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation may be amended by mutual consent of the Parties at any time, provided that these amendments are approved in accordance with the procedures established for obtaining approval for this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

This Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation may be amended by mutual consent of the Parties at any time, provided that these amendments are approved in accordance with the procedures established for obtaining approval for this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation.

| 2. | The Parties will enter into consultations with respect to the amendment of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation at the request of either of them. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Parties will enter into consultations with respect to the amendment of this Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation at the request of either of them.

Point 19

Relation to other instruments

This Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation replaces the Memorandum of Understanding between Eurojust and OLAF, dated 14 April 2003.

Point 20

Entry into force

This Practical Agreement on arrangements of cooperation will enter into force on the first day after its signature.

Done at Brussels, this twenty fourth of September two thousand and eight, in two copies in the English language.

For Eurojust

José Luís LOPES DA MOTA

President

For OLAF

Franz-Hermann BRÜNER

Director

---

(1)  OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 286, 22.11.2002, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 136, 31.5.1999, p. 20.

3

(4)  OJ L 136, 31.5.1999, p. 1.

4

(5)  OJ L 136, 31.5.1999, p. 8.

5

(6)  OJ C 68, 19.3.2005, p. 1.

6

(7)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

7

(8)  OJ C 197, 12.7.2000, p. 3.

8

(9)  OJ L 162, 20.6.2002, p. 1.

9

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT JA ORGANITELT

Komisjon

| 9.12.2008 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 314/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2008

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 314/8

---

Euro vahetuskurss (1)

8. detsember 2008

(2008/C 314/03)

1 euro=

| | Valuuta | Kurss |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | USA dollar | 1,2854 |
| JPY | Jaapani jeen | 120,10 |
| DKK | Taani kroon | 7,4497 |
| GBP | Inglise nael | 0,86510 |
| SEK | Rootsi kroon | 10,4150 |
| CHF | Šveitsi frank | 1,5590 |
| ISK | Islandi kroon | 290,00 |
| NOK | Norra kroon | 9,1270 |
| BGN | Bulgaaria lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Tšehhi kroon | 25,712 |
| EEK | Eesti kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Ungari forint | 264,45 |
| LTL | Leedu litt | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Läti latt | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Poola zlott | 3,8875 |
| RON | Rumeenia leu | 3,8795 |
| SKK | Slovakkia kroon | 30,195 |
| TRY | Türgi liir | 2,0341 |
| AUD | Austraalia dollar | 1,9377 |
| CAD | Kanada dollar | 1,6067 |
| HKD | Hong Kongi dollar | 9,9633 |
| NZD | Uus-Meremaa dollar | 2,3690 |
| SGD | Singapuri dollar | 1,9400 |
| KRW | Korea won | 1 865,53 |
| ZAR | Lõuna-Aafrika rand | 13,1246 |
| CNY | Hiina jüaan | 8,8436 |
| HRK | Horvaatia kuna | 7,1948 |
| IDR | Indoneesia ruupia | 14 974,91 |
| MYR | Malaisia ringit | 4,6756 |
| PHP | Filipiini peeso | 62,470 |
| RUB | Vene rubla | 36,0075 |
| THB | Tai baht | 45,702 |
| BRL | Brasiilia reaal | 3,1580 |
| MXN | Mehhiko peeso | 17,3209 |

Valuuta

Kurss

USD

USA dollar

1,2854

JPY

Jaapani jeen

120,10

DKK

Taani kroon

7,4497

GBP

Inglise nael

0,86510

SEK

Rootsi kroon

10,4150

CHF

Šveitsi frank

1,5590

ISK

Islandi kroon

290,00

NOK

Norra kroon

9,1270

BGN

Bulgaaria lev

1,9558

CZK

Tšehhi kroon

25,712

EEK

Eesti kroon

15,6466

HUF

Ungari forint

264,45

LTL

Leedu litt

3,4528

LVL

Läti latt

0,7093

PLN

Poola zlott

3,8875

RON

Rumeenia leu

3,8795

SKK

Slovakkia kroon

30,195

TRY

Türgi liir

2,0341

AUD

Austraalia dollar

1,9377

CAD

Kanada dollar

1,6067

HKD

Hong Kongi dollar

9,9633

NZD

Uus-Meremaa dollar

2,3690

SGD

Singapuri dollar

1,9400

KRW

Korea won

1 865,53

ZAR

Lõuna-Aafrika rand

13,1246

CNY

Hiina jüaan

8,8436

HRK

Horvaatia kuna

7,1948

IDR

Indoneesia ruupia

14 974,91

MYR

Malaisia ringit

4,6756

PHP

Filipiini peeso

62,470

RUB

Vene rubla

36,0075

THB

Tai baht

45,702

BRL

Brasiilia reaal

3,1580

MXN

Mehhiko peeso

17,3209

---

(1)

Allikas: EKP avaldatud viitekurss.

---

TEAVE LIIKMESRIIKIDELT

| 9.12.2008 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 314/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2008

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 314/9

---

Liikmesriikide esitatav teave riigiabi kohta, mida antakse kooskõlas komisjoni määrusega (EÜ) nr 1628/2006, mis käsitleb EÜ asutamislepingu artiklite 87 ja 88 kohaldamist investeeringuteks ettenähtud regionaalabi suhtes

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

(2008/C 314/04)

| Abi nr | XR 16/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Liikmesriik | Poola |
| Piirkond | Lubuskie |
| Abikava nimetus või sihtotstarbelist abi saava ettevõtte nimi | Program pomocy regionalnej na wspieranie nowych inwestycji i na tworzenie nowych miejsc pracy związanych z nową inwestycją, przeznaczonych dla przedsiębiorców prowadzących działalność gospodarczą na terenie miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. oraz na terenie specjalnych stref ekonomicznych usytuowanych w obrębie miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. |
| Õiguslik alus | Ustawa z dnia 12 stycznia 1991 roku o podatkach i opłatach lokalnych (tekst jedn. z 2006 r. Dz.U. nr 121, poz. 844 ze zm.).
  Uchwała nr XI/158/2007 Rady Miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. z dnia 23 maja 2007 r. w sprawie programu pomocy regionalnej na wspieranie nowych inwestycji i na tworzenie nowych miejsc pracy związanych z nową inwestycją, przeznaczonych dla przedsiębiorców prowadzących działalność gospodarczą na terenie miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. oraz na terenie specjalnych stref ekonomicznych usytuowanych w obrębie miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. |
| Meetme liik | Abiskeem |
| Kavandatud aastased kulutused | 1 miljon PLN |
| Abi suurim osatähtsus | 50 % |
| Kooskõlas määruse artikliga 4 |
| Rakendamise kuupäev | 9.6.2007 |
| Kestus | 31.12.2013 |
| Majandusharud | Kõik investeeringuteks ettenähtud regionaalabikõlblikud sektorid |
| Abi andva asutuse nimi ja aadress | Prezydent Miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. |
| ul. Sikorskiego 3–4 |
| PL-66-400 Gorzów Wlkp |
| tel. (48-95) 721 95 27 |
| e-mail: wojnicka@um.gorzow.pl |

Abi nr

XR 16/08

Liikmesriik

Poola

Piirkond

Lubuskie

Abikava nimetus või sihtotstarbelist abi saava ettevõtte nimi

Program pomocy regionalnej na wspieranie nowych inwestycji i na tworzenie nowych miejsc pracy związanych z nową inwestycją, przeznaczonych dla przedsiębiorców prowadzących działalność gospodarczą na terenie miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. oraz na terenie specjalnych stref ekonomicznych usytuowanych w obrębie miasta Gorzowa Wlkp.

Õiguslik alus

Ustawa z dnia 12 stycznia 1991 roku o podatkach i opłatach lokalnych (tekst jedn. z 2006 r. Dz.U. nr 121, poz. 844 ze zm.).

Uchwała nr XI/158/2007 Rady Miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. z dnia 23 maja 2007 r. w sprawie programu pomocy regionalnej na wspieranie nowych inwestycji i na tworzenie nowych miejsc pracy związanych z nową inwestycją, przeznaczonych dla przedsiębiorców prowadzących działalność gospodarczą na terenie miasta Gorzowa Wlkp. oraz na terenie specjalnych stref ekonomicznych usytuowanych w obrębie miasta Gorzowa Wlkp.

Meetme liik

Abiskeem

Kavandatud aastased kulutused

1 miljon PLN

Abi suurim osatähtsus

50 %

Kooskõlas määruse artikliga 4

Rakendamise kuupäev

9.6.2007

Kestus

31.12.2013

Majandusharud

Kõik investeeringuteks ettenähtud regionaalabikõlblikud sektorid

Abi andva asutuse nimi ja aadress

Prezydent Miasta Gorzowa Wlkp.

ul. Sikorskiego 3–4

PL-66-400 Gorzów Wlkp

tel. (48-95) 721 95 27

e-mail: wojnicka@um.gorzow.pl

Interneti-aadress, millel abikava avaldati

http://www.wojewodalubuski.pl/download.php?what=../dzienniki/2007/duwl52.pdf

Muu teave

—

| Abi nr | XR 41/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Liikmesriik | Belgia |
| Piirkond | Brabant wallon (Tubize); Namur (Dinant, Houyet, Rochefort, Sambreville et Somme-Leuze); Liège (Awans, Dison, Engis, Flémalle, Grâce-Hollogne, Herstal, Liège, Oupeye, Saint-Nicolas, Seraing, Verviers et Visé); Luxembourg (Bastogne, Bertogne, La roche-en Ardenne, Libin, Libramont-Chevigny, Marche-en-Famenne, Neufchâteau, Tellin et Vielsalm). |
| Abikava nimetus või sihtotstarbelist abi saava ettevõtte nimi | Incitants en favour des entreprises (grandes entreprises et PME) objectif convergence |
| Õiguslik alus | Arrêté du GW du 6 mai 2006 portant exécution du décret du 11 mars 2004 relatif aux incitants régionaux en faveur des grandes entreprises modifié par l'arrêté du Gouvernement wallon du 17 janvier 2008; Arrêté du GW du 6 mai 2006 portant exécution du décret du 11 mars 2004 relatif aux incitants régionaux en faveur des PME modifié par l'arrêté du Gouvernement wallon du 17 janvier 2008; Arrêté du GW du 6 décembre 2006 déterminant les zones de développement pour la période 2007-2013 |
| Meetme liik | Abiskeem |
| Kavandatud aastased kulutused | 18,7 miljonit EUR |
| Abi suurim osatähtsus | 15 % |
| Kooskõlas määruse artikliga 4 |
| Rakendamise kuupäev | 8.2.2008 |
| Kestus | 31.12.2013 |
| Majandusharud | Kõik investeeringuteks ettenähtud regionaalabikõlblikud sektorid |
| Abi andva asutuse nimi ja aadress | Direction générale de l'Économie et de l'Emploi |
| Direction de la Politique économique |
| Place de la Wallonie, 1, bât. 1 |
| B-5100 Jambes |

Abi nr

XR 41/08

Liikmesriik

Belgia

Piirkond

Brabant wallon (Tubize); Namur (Dinant, Houyet, Rochefort, Sambreville et Somme-Leuze); Liège (Awans, Dison, Engis, Flémalle, Grâce-Hollogne, Herstal, Liège, Oupeye, Saint-Nicolas, Seraing, Verviers et Visé); Luxembourg (Bastogne, Bertogne, La roche-en Ardenne, Libin, Libramont-Chevigny, Marche-en-Famenne, Neufchâteau, Tellin et Vielsalm).

Abikava nimetus või sihtotstarbelist abi saava ettevõtte nimi

Incitants en favour des entreprises (grandes entreprises et PME) objectif convergence

Õiguslik alus

Arrêté du GW du 6 mai 2006 portant exécution du décret du 11 mars 2004 relatif aux incitants régionaux en faveur des grandes entreprises modifié par l'arrêté du Gouvernement wallon du 17 janvier 2008; Arrêté du GW du 6 mai 2006 portant exécution du décret du 11 mars 2004 relatif aux incitants régionaux en faveur des PME modifié par l'arrêté du Gouvernement wallon du 17 janvier 2008; Arrêté du GW du 6 décembre 2006 déterminant les zones de développement pour la période 2007-2013

Meetme liik

Abiskeem

Kavandatud aastased kulutused

18,7 miljonit EUR

Abi suurim osatähtsus

15 %

Kooskõlas määruse artikliga 4

Rakendamise kuupäev

8.2.2008

Kestus

31.12.2013

Majandusharud

Kõik investeeringuteks ettenähtud regionaalabikõlblikud sektorid

Abi andva asutuse nimi ja aadress

Direction générale de l'Économie et de l'Emploi

Direction de la Politique économique

Place de la Wallonie, 1, bât. 1

B-5100 Jambes

Interneti-aadress, millel abikava avaldati

http://wallex.wallonie.be

Muu teave

—

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Komisjon

| 9.12.2008 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 314/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2008

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 314/11

---

Konkursikutse seoses Euroopa Ühenduse teadusuuringute, tehnoloogiaarenduse ja tutvustamistegevuse seitsmenda raamprogrammi tööprogrammiga „Võimekus”

(2008/C 314/05)

Teatatakse konkursikutsest seoses Euroopa Ühenduse teadusuuringute, tehnoloogiaarenduse ja tutvustamistegevuse seitsmenda raamprogrammi (2007–2013) tööprogrammiga „Võimekus”.

Taotlusi oodatakse allpool nimetatud konkursile.

Eriprogramm „Võimekus”:

| Osa | : | Teadustöö infrastruktuurid |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Konkursikutse tunnus | : | FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2009-1 |

Osa

:

Teadustöö infrastruktuurid

Konkursikutse tunnus

:

FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2009-1

See konkursikutse on seotud tööprogrammiga, mis on vastu võetud komisjoni 26. augusti 2008. aasta otsusega K(2008) 4566.

Konkursi eelarvet, tähtaegasid ja eeskirju käsitlev teave, tööprogramm ja taotluste esitamise juhised on kättesaadavad CORDISe veebilehel: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---

ÜHISE KAUBANDUSPOLIITIKA RAKENDAMISEGA SEOTUD MENETLUSED

Komisjon

| 9.12.2008 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 314/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2008

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 314/12

---

Kaebuse 2007/2001 menetlemise kavandatud lõpetamine

(2008/C 314/06)

Euroopa Komisjon on saanud mitmeid kaebusi seoses Rumeenias kogutava diskrimineeriva maksuga, mida kohaldatakse riigi territooriumil mootorsõiduki esmase registreerimise korral. Euroopa Komisjoni peasekretariaat on selle küsimusega seoses registreerinud arvukalt kaebusi ja kirju. Viitenumbrite 2007/4078, 2007/4079 ja 2007/4151 all registreeritud kaebusi ja muud kirjavahetust ELi huvitatud kodanikelt käsitleti koondtoimikuna viitenumbriga 2007/2001.

Vastutav komisjoni osakond on eespool nimetatud juhtumi uurimise lõpetanud. Selleks et teavitada nõuetekohaselt lisaks kaebuste esitajatele ka kõiki teisi huvitatud isikuid, on komisjon otsustanud avaldada käesoleva teatise, milles ta väljendab oma kavatsust lõpetada kaebuse menetlemine.

Kuigi on selge, et ühenduse tasandil ei ole sõiduautodega seotud makse ühtlustatud ning seega võivad liikmesriigid ise kehtestada sellised maksud ja otsustada nende määrad ja kohaldamismeetodid, piirab liikmesriikide vabadust selles küsimuses Euroopa Ühenduse asutamisleping ja eriti selle artikkel 90, mis keelab muudest liikmesriikidest pärit toodete diskrimineeriva maksustamise.

Rumeenia sätted sõiduauto registreerimismaksu kohta ei paistnud olevat kooskõlas EÜ asutamislepingu artikliga 90. Sellest tulenevalt algatas komisjon 23. märtsil 2007 rikkumismenetluse, saates Rumeeniale ametliku kirja (IP/07/372). Komisjon viitas Euroopa Kohtu praktikale, mille raames on järjepidevalt otsustatud, et kui uue ja kasutatud mootorsõiduki eest kogutakse maksu ainult üks kord, siis ei tohi teisest liikmesriigist pärit kasutatud mootorsõiduki suhtes kohaldatava maksu summa ühelgi juhul ületada kõnealuses liikmesriigis juba uuena registreeritud sarnase kasutatud auto turuväärtuses sisalduvat jääkmaksu. Selleks peavad liikmesriigid arvesse võtma imporditud kasutatud mootorsõidukite amortisatsiooni.

Rumeenia nõustus ametliku kirjaga ja töötas välja üldised suunised, mis võeti vajalike muudatuste koostamisel aluseks. Lisaks suunistele töötati välja ka tabel auto registreerimismaksu summa arvutamiseks ja selleks otstarbeks kasutatavad määrad, sealhulgas fikseeritud summadega amortisatsioonitabel. Vaatamata sellele ei võetud vajalikke muudatusi vastu õigeaegselt.

28. novembril 2007 esitas komisjon Rumeeniale põhjendatud arvamuse ja taotles, et Rumeenia viiks oma õigusaktid kooskõlla ühenduse õigusega nii, nagu seda on tõlgendanud Euroopa Kohus (IP/07/1799). Sellele järgnesid mitmed tehnilisi küsimusi käsitlevad koosolekud ja arutelud õigusakti eelnõu versioonide üle, mille tulemusel võeti 21. aprillil 2008 vastu erakorraline määrus nr 50/2008 (mis avaldati Rumeenia riigiteatajas 25. aprillil 2008), millega muudeti vaidlustatud õigusakti. Rumeenia valitsus on samuti heaks kiitnud metoodika erakorralise määruse nr 50/2008 kohaldamiseks, lisades erakorralise määruse 4. lisa sätetesse, mis käsitlevad parandatud fikseeritud summadega amortisatsioonitabeli kohaldamist, V jaotise „Kasutatud mootorsõiduki tegeliku amortisatsiooni kindlaksmääramine”. Sellega tagatakse, et tasumisele kuuluva auto registreerimismaksu summa arvutamisel võetakse arvesse kasutatud mootorsõiduki tegelikku amortisatsiooni.

Lisaks kaotati eespool nimetatud Rumeenia õigusaktiga diskrimineeriv korrelatsioonikordaja, sätestati nõuetekohane uue mootorsõiduki mõiste ja anti maksumaksjale õigus lasta oma mootorsõidukit individuaalselt kontrollida, et kindlaks määrata selle tegelik amortisatsioon. Vastuvõetud õigusaktiga avaldati üldsusele ka kriteeriumid, mille alusel määratakse kindlaks kasutatud mootorsõiduki amortisatsioon.

Pidades silmas eespool esitatud teavet, on vastutav komisjoni osakond arvamusel, et Rumeenia ametiasutused on võtnud asjakohased meetmed, et tagada kooskõla ühenduse õigusega, ja praegu tundub, et auto registreerimismaksu käsitlevad Rumeenia õigusaktid on viidud kooskõlla EÜ asutamislepingu artikliga 90.

Seetõttu teeb vastutav osakond komisjonile ettepaneku kõnealune juhtum lõpetada.

---

KONKURENTSIPOLIITIKA RAKENDAMISEGA SEOTUD MENETLUSED

Komisjon

| 9.12.2008 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 314/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2008

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 314/14

---

Eelteatis koondumise kohta

(Juhtum nr COMP/M.5358 — Arizona/Abieta)

(EMPs kohaldatav tekst)

(2008/C 314/07)

| 1. | 2. detsembril 2008 sai komisjon nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 139/2004 (1) artiklile 4 vastava ja artikli 4 lõike 5 kohaselt tehtud ettepanekule järgnenud teatise kavandatava koondumise kohta, mille raames ettevõtja Arizona Chemical GmbH („Arizona”, Saksamaa), mis kuulub kontserni Arizona Chemical group, omandab täieliku kontrolli nimetatud nõukogu määruse artikli 3 lõike 1 punkti b tähenduses ettevõtja Abieta Chemie GmbH („Abieta”, Saksamaa) üle aktsiate ostu teel. |
| --- | --- |

1.

2. detsembril 2008 sai komisjon nõukogu määruse (EÜ) nr 139/2004 (1) artiklile 4 vastava ja artikli 4 lõike 5 kohaselt tehtud ettepanekule järgnenud teatise kavandatava koondumise kohta, mille raames ettevõtja Arizona Chemical GmbH („Arizona”, Saksamaa), mis kuulub kontserni Arizona Chemical group, omandab täieliku kontrolli nimetatud nõukogu määruse artikli 3 lõike 1 punkti b tähenduses ettevõtja Abieta Chemie GmbH („Abieta”, Saksamaa) üle aktsiate ostu teel.

| 2. | Asjaomaste ettevõtjate majandustegevus hõlmab järgmist:






  — | Arizona: õlikeemiatoodete rafineerimine, töötlemine ja müük; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Asjaomaste ettevõtjate majandustegevus hõlmab järgmist:

—

Arizona: õlikeemiatoodete rafineerimine, töötlemine ja müük;

| — | Abieta: emulgaatorina kasutatava kampolseebi tootmine ja müük. |
| --- | --- |

—

Abieta: emulgaatorina kasutatava kampolseebi tootmine ja müük.

| 3. | Komisjon leiab pärast teatise esialgset läbivaatamist, et tehing, millest teatatakse, võib kuuluda määruse (EÜ) nr 139/2004 reguleerimisalasse, kuid lõplikku otsust selle kohta ei ole veel tehtud. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Komisjon leiab pärast teatise esialgset läbivaatamist, et tehing, millest teatatakse, võib kuuluda määruse (EÜ) nr 139/2004 reguleerimisalasse, kuid lõplikku otsust selle kohta ei ole veel tehtud.

| 4. | Komisjon kutsub huvitatud kolmandaid isikuid esitama komisjonile oma võimalikke märkusi kavandatava toimingu kohta.
  Komisjon peab märkused kätte saama kümne päeva jooksul pärast käesoleva dokumendi avaldamist. Märkusi võib saata komisjonile faksi teel ((32-2) 296 43 01 või 296 72 44) või postiga järgmisel aadressil (lisada viitenumber COMP/M.5358 — Arizona/Abieta):





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

Komisjon kutsub huvitatud kolmandaid isikuid esitama komisjonile oma võimalikke märkusi kavandatava toimingu kohta.

Komisjon peab märkused kätte saama kümne päeva jooksul pärast käesoleva dokumendi avaldamist. Märkusi võib saata komisjonile faksi teel ((32-2) 296 43 01 või 296 72 44) või postiga järgmisel aadressil (lisada viitenumber COMP/M.5358 — Arizona/Abieta):

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  ELT L 24, 29.1.2004, lk 1.

---

9.12.2008

| 9.12.2008 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | C 314/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

C 314/s3

---

MÄRKUS LUGEJALE

Institutsioonid on otsustanud edaspidi oma tekstides mitte märkida viidatud õigusaktide viimaseid muudatusi.

Kui ei ole teisiti märgitud, mõistetakse siin avaldatud tekstides viidatud õigusaktide all neid akte koos kõigi muudatustega.

---