alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 661 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 661

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the commercial 
operation of supersonic transport category aircraft that do not comply 
with stage 3 noise levels if the European Union adopts certain aircraft 
                           noise regulations.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 661

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to prohibit the commercial 
operation of supersonic transport category aircraft that do not comply 
with stage 3 noise levels if the European Union adopts certain aircraft 
                           noise regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT CATEGORY 
              AIRCRAFT.

    If the European Union adopts Common Position (EC) No. 66/98 as a 
final regulation or adopts any similar final regulation, the Secretary 
of Transportation shall prohibit, after such date of adoption, the 
commercial operation of a civil supersonic transport category aircraft 
to or from an airport in the United States unless the Secretary finds 
that the aircraft complies with stage 3 noise levels.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 3, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.213-3 Decisions on record where a hearing is waived.

Whenever a hearing is waived pursuant to § 101-6.212 a decision shall be made by the responsible GSA official on the record and a copy of such decision shall be given in writing to the applicant or recipient, and to the complainant, if any.
#### § 102-194.5 What is the Standard and Optional Forms Management Program?

The Standard and Optional Forms Management Program is a Governmentwide program that promotes economies and efficiencies through the development, maintenance and use of common forms. The General Services Administration (GSA) provides additional guidance on the Standard and Optional Forms Management Program through an external handbook called Standard and Optional Forms Procedural Handbook. You may obtain a copy of the handbook from:

Standard and Optional Forms Management Office General Services Administration (Forms-XR)

1800 F Street, NW.; Room 7126

Washington, DC 20405-0002

(202) 501-0581

*http://www.gsa.gov/forms*
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0521 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2013 - SW - 010 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Ch.02 – ADR in Business","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YqUUrNahfA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch02\/\">Ch.02 – ADR in Business<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch02\/embed\/#?secret=YqUUrNahfA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ch.02 – ADR in Business” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"YqUUrNahfA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
### Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills Sandstone and Adjacent Parts of the Lewis Shale and Lance Formation, East Flank of the Rock Springs Uplift, Southwest Wyoming

By: H. W. Roehler

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1532

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

 CASE NO.: 0:22-cv-62249-WPD

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BRYAN PETROLEUM 104, LLC

a Florida Limited Liability Company

d/b/a BP CONNECT

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The Plaintiff, HOWARD COHAN and the Defendant, BRYAN PETROLEUM 104, LLC, 

a Florida Limited Liability Company, d/b/a BP CONNECT, (the Parties) hereby stipulate that (1) 

the Parties have settled this action; (2) Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses this action with prejudice 

against BRYAN PETROLEUM 104, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, d/b/a BP 

CONNECT; (3) the Parties shall bear their own costs and fees except as provided for in the Parties’ 

Settlement Agreement; and (4) the Parties condition the stipulation upon this Court entering an 

order retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties’ Settlement Agreement. See Anago 

Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012).

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED March 3, 2023

By: /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0105553

Samantha L. Simpson, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 1010423

Sconzo Law Office, P.A.

3825 PGA Boulevard, Suite 207

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Telephone: (561) 729-0940

Facsimile: (561) 491-9459

Email: greg@sconzolawoffice.com

Email: samantha@sconzolawoffice.com

By: /s/ Joshua M. Entin

JOSHUA M. ENTIN, ESQ.

Fla. Bar No: 0493724

ENTIN LAW GROUP, P.A.

1213 S.E. Third Avenue

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33316

Tel: (954) 761-7201

E-mail: josh@entinlaw.com

Counsel for Defendant

Case 0:22-cv-62249-WPD Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Email: alexa@sconzolawoffice.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 3, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being 

served this day on counsel of record in this action via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF.

_ /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Case 0:22-cv-62249-WPD Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2023 Page 2 of 2
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 166)IV-E-3 9 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:56

PM Sheet 166 of 242*<* D «<>, . P. 2

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y A N N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 

### MA Y

### I 6 198 8 OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Transmitta l o f Videocassett e o f th e EPA/MVM

AOnboard Refueling Meeting - Apri l 13 , 198 8 FROM : Ala n Schuler , Mechanica l Enginee r

Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h 

## JJ..-L
?0 : THRU : Publi c Docke t A-87-1 1 ') '- /

Joh n F . Anderson , Senio r Projec t Manage r y]^^\^\CLAiM^^A^ Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branch Thi s memorandu

m accompanie s a 2 hou r an d 1 0 minut e videocassett e tap e (1/ 2 - inch , VHS ) o f a meeting betwee n representative s fro mEPA , the Moto r Vehicl e Manufacturer s Associatio n (MVMA) , an d variou s automotive manufacturers . Thi s meeting wa s hel d o n Apri l 13 , 198 8 a t EPA' s Moto r Vehicl e Emissio n Laboratoryin An n Arbor , Michigan . EP Adiscusse d s newl ydevelope d onboard syste mt o contro l refuelin g emissions , displaye d related hardware , reported , tes t result s an d answered questions .
1

Ogulei, David

From: Garnett, Kim

Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:30 PM

To: Ogulei, David

Subject: FW: another one

From: John Cooper [mailto:jacooper@cooperenvironmental.com] 

Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 3:02 PM 

To: Bivins, Dan 

Cc: Garnett, Kim; andreag@cooperenvironmental.com; kragp@cooperenvironmental.com 

Subject: RE: another one 

Thanks again. We will have our responses to you when you get back on Tuesday. 

John 

From: Bivins, Dan [mailto:Bivins.Dan@epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:57 AM 

To: John Cooper 

Cc: Garnett, Kim 

Subject: another one 

#48 Comment: OTM 16 and 20 are site-specific methods and are not applicable to Veolia’s operations. OTM 

16 and 20 were written specifically for Eli Lilly and Co.’s (Lilly) source and instrument. While they would 

provide a starting place for another facility to develop their own site-specific method, one cannot assume that 

either could be used at another facility without significant modification. For example, the sample transport 

system in OTM 16 provides for a protocol for including the sample transport system into the instrument

validation using either dynamic spiking of known gases or comparison to another method (instrumental or 

reference, M29, filters/tubes and Ohio Luminex, etc.). This was written specifically for the Lilly system using a 

Sigrist sampling system. It is not at all clear that an appropriate sample transport system could be designed and 

developed for Veolia’s stack gas conditions. Lilly spent considerable time and resources in developing both the 

laboratory and stack data underlying these methods. It is also not clear whether this instrument would tie into 

Veolia’s daily operations, alarms, and QA/QC procedures. It is likely that these two OTMs would need 

extensive work before they would be usable for the conditions in Veolia’s stack. 

In addition, there is a good chance that the current QAG will not be able to produce quantitative mass of metals 

in the ranges required to calibrate/test the Xact. The QAG operates as a dynamic spiking into the probe/sample 

loop of the Xact system. Operation of this unit is dependent on the type of probe used, the flow in the sample 

loop, and gas conditions. Lilly spent a year developing this device to present the mass of metals specific to its 

sample loop (flow/moisture, etc.). 

Dan Bivins 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Measurement Technology Group 

919-541-5244
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 552 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 552

   To provide for award of the Navy Combat Action Ribbon based upon 
 participation in ground or surface combat as a member of the Navy or 
Marine Corps during the period between July 4, 1943, and March 1, 1961.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

Mr. McNulty (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Bishop, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. 
  Ackerman, Mr. Fossella, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
 Borski, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Coyne, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Kleczka, Mr. Green of 
  Texas, Mr. Shays, Mr. Holden, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
 Underwood, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Towns, Mr. Shows, Mr. Clement, 
 Mr. Doyle, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Foley, Mr. Romero-Barcelo, Mrs. Johnson 
of Connecticut, Mr. Gibbons, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Sanford, 
 Mr. Lantos, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Allen, Mr. Filner, 
Mrs. Jones of Ohio, and Mr. Kolbe) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for award of the Navy Combat Action Ribbon based upon 
 participation in ground or surface combat as a member of the Navy or 
Marine Corps during the period between July 4, 1943, and March 1, 1961.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of 
the Navy shall provide for award of the Navy Combat Action Ribbon 
(established by Secretary of the Navy Notice 1650, dated February 17, 
1969) with respect to participation in ground or surface combat during 
any period after July 4, 1943, and before March 1, 1961 (the date of 
the otherwise applicable limitation on retroactivity).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 102-74.65 Are cafeterias authorized under the Randolph-Sheppard Act operated by permit or contract?

They are operated by contract. As set forth at 34 CFR part 395, the Federal property manager contracts with the State licensing agency to license blind vendors to operate cafeterias on Federal property.
Matthew Rodriquez 

Secretary for 

Environmental Protection 

April 23, 2015 

Air Resources Board 

Mary D. Nichols, Chairman 

1001 I Street • P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95812 • www.arb.ca.gov 

Matthew Lakin, Ph.D., Manager 

Air Planning Office, Region 9 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Dear Dr. Lakin: 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

Governor 

Per your request, the Air Resources Board (ARB) is providing the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency with information regarding the impacts of amendments to the 

Regulation for In-Use On-Road Diesel-Fueled Vehicles (Truck and Bus Regulation) on 

the 2016 Rate of Progress (ROP) and 2017 attainment year in the San Joaquin Valley 

1-hour Ozone Plan (Plan). 

Analysis by ARB staff indicates that the temporary loss of benefits of 5 tons per day 

oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions due to the Truck and Bus Regulation amendments 

can be accommodated in the 2016 ROP and the attainment demonstration. In the Plan, 

Table 4-2 documents that the loss can be accommodated in the 2016 ROP 

demonstration. Also, the Plan specifies that the 2017 1-hour ozone modeled design 

value is 119.3 parts per billion (ppb), well below the level of the 1-hour ozone standard 

of 124 ppb. The difference between the level of the standard and the modeled design 

value can accommodate the temporary increase in NOx emissions. Supporting analysis 

regarding the attainment demonstration is provided in the enclosure with this letter. 

If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 324-7163 or at 

Sylvia.Vanderspek@arb.ca.gov. 

lvia Vanderspek, Chief 

Air Quality Planning Branch 

Enclosure 

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. 

For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.qov. 

California Environmental Protection Agency 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Matthew Lakin, Ph.D. 

April 23, 2015 

Page 2 

bee: Daniel Whitney, EO 

Karen Magliano, AQPSD 

Webster Tasat, AQPSD 

Elizabeth Melgoza, AQPSD 

External bee: (via email with enclosure) 

John Ungvarsky, U.S. EPA, Region 9, Ungvarsky.John@epamail.epa.gov 

Doris Lo, U.S. EPA, Region 9, Lo.Doris@epamail.epa.gov 

Anita Lee, U.S. EPA, Region 9, Lee.Anita@epa.gov 

EO Chron 

AQPSD Chron 

SIP Library 

Assignment #9445 

X:\SJV 2013 1-hour Ozone Plan\Region 9 TnB Amendments lmpaet_EM.doex
<PAGE>

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


                            HINES HORTICULTURE, INC.


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                List of Subsidiaries of Hines Horticulture, Inc.

         The following is a list of subsidiaries of Hines Horticulture, Inc.
(the "Company"). The common stock of all the corporations listed below are
wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company. If indented, the
corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the corporation under which it is
listed.

NAME OF CORPORATION                                JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
-------------------                                -----------------------------

Hines Horticulture, Inc.                                      Delaware
     Hines Nurseries, Inc.                                    California
          Hines SGUS, Inc.                                    Nevada
          Enviro-Safe Laboratories, Inc.                      Florida
RETURN OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Southern District of Florida

Copyright © 1992-2023 DreamBuilt Software, Inc. - Process Server's Toolbox V8.2n

Case Number: 22-CV-23753-KMM

Plaintiff:

EDWIN GARRISON, ET AL., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND

ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED

vs.

Defendant:

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, ET AL.

For:

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 ALHAMBRA PLAZA

SUITE 601

CORAL GABLES, FL 33134

Received by P.I. SERVICES on the 21st day of February, 2023 at 3:32 pm to be served on UDONIS

HASLEM, 5450 SW 192 TERRACE, SOUTHWEST RANCHES, FL 33332.

I, ALIX LUBIN, do hereby affirm that on the 28th day of February, 2023 at 8:38 am, I:

SUBSTITUTE SERVED this SUMMONS AND AMENDED COMPLAINT (21 DAYS) on FAITH HASLEM 

Spouse of the within named defendant, pursuant to F.S.48.031(2).(A). 

Description of Person Served: Age: 41, Sex: F, Race/Skin Color: BLACK, Height: N/A, Weight: 150,

Hair: BLACK, Glasses: N

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that I have read the Foregoing Verified Return of Service and that

the facts stated in it are true. F.S.92.525(2). I acknowledge that I am a Certified Process Server in good

standing in this jurisdiction. I acknowledge that I have no interest in this action.

ALIX LUBIN

S.P.S. 1212

P.I. SERVICES

1430 S. Dixie Highway

Suite 105, #157

Coral Gables, FL 33146

(305) 666-0142

Our Job Serial Number: PIS-2023000250

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/01/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-72.70 What are Executive agencies' responsibilities under a delegation of lease management authority (contracting officer representative authority) from GSA?

When an Executive agency does not exercise the delegation of authority mentioned in § 102-72.30(b) to lease general purpose space itself, it may be delegated, upon request, lease management authority to manage the administration of one or more lease contracts awarded by GSA.