alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned, Joseph J. Talley Chief Financial Officer of American Crystal SugarCompany, (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.    TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.    Information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operation of the Company.

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this14th day of July, 2006.

 
| By:    | /s/  Joseph J. Talley           |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Name:  Joseph J. Talley         |   |   |
|   | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
|        |                                 |        |        |  |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 101-27.208 Inventory analyses.

(a) An inventory analysis shall be conducted periodically for each Type I item to determine whether the quantity on hand will be used within the established shelf-life period. If the analysis indicates there are quantities which will not be used within the shelf-life period, arrangements shall be made to ensure use of the item(s) within the holding agency or for redistribution to other agencies.

(b) An inventory analysis shall be conducted periodically for each Type II item with a shelf life of 60 months or less to determine whether issue of the quantity on hand is anticipated prior to the expiration of the designated shelf life. This analysis shall be made as follows:

| Shelf-life period | Date of analysis |
| --- | --- |
| 48 to 60 mos | 12 to 16 mo. prior to expiration. |
| 36 to 48 mos | 8 to 12 mo. prior to expiration. |
| 18 to 36 mos | 6 to 8 mo. prior to expiration. |
| 12 to 18 mos | 4 to 6 mo. prior to expiration. |
| 6 to 12 mos | 3 to 4 mo. prior to expiration. |
| Up to 6 mos | No analysis required, but special emphasis should be placed on good requirements determination and proper order quantity. |

(1) If the analysis indicates that the quantity on hand will not be issued within the shelf-life period and the cost of inspection or testing is not significant in relation to the line item value, the items shall be inspected to determine if the shelf-life period can be extended.

(2) If the analysis indicates that the quantity on hand will be issued within the shelf-life period, inspection is not required. However, such items shall be viewed again during the last month of the shelf-life period to determine whether quantities are sufficient to warrant inspection. The guidelines in § 101-27.207-2 shall be used to determine whether quantities are sufficient to warrant inspection and for extending the shelf-life period.

(3) If an agency does not have an inspection capability and the quantity and value of an indicated overage is sufficiently large to warrant special consideration, arrangements shall be made for qualified inspection or laboratory testing to determine whether the material is suitable for issue.

[40 FR 59596, Dec. 29, 1975]
Exhibit 32
                        American Airlines, Inc.
                             Certification
       Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                          United States Code)


Pursuant   to  section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act   of   2002
(subsections  (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63  of  title  18,
United  States  Code), each of the undersigned officers  of  American
Airlines,  Inc.,  a Delaware corporation (the Company),  does  hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  March  31,
2004  (the  Form  10-Q)  of  the  Company  fully  complies  with  the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934  and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in  all  material respects, the financial condition  and  results  of
operations of the Company.

Date:  April 23, 2004          /s/ Gerard J. Arpey
                               Gerard J. Arpey
                               President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  April 23, 2004          /s/ James A. Beer
                               James A. Beer
                               Senior Vice President and Chief
                               Financial Officer



The  foregoing  certification is being furnished solely  pursuant  to
section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections  (a)  and
(b)  of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and
is  not  being  filed  as  part of the Form 10-Q  or  as  a  separate
disclosure document.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
    period ended March 31, 2005 (the Periodic
    Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
    78o(d)) and
|
| | 2. Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of AT&T Corp.                                                                                                                                 



| |                     
| | --------------------
| | /s/ Thomas W. Horton
| |                     
| | Thomas W. Horton
Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 40-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 1 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 40-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 2 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 40-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 3 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 40-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 4 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 40-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 5 of 6
Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 40-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 6 of 6
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00692-CV

David Z. Hernandez, Appellant

v.

Elm Ridge Apartments, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-15-008088, HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On the parties’ joint motion, this cause has been abated in aid of settlement

negotiations. The parties have now filed a joint agreed motion advising this Court that they have 1

succeeded in settling the underlying dispute and requesting that we “dismiss this appeal pursuant to

their settlement agreement” and order “that costs be assessed against the party incurring the same.”

We grant the motion, dismiss the appeal, and order that each party bear its own costs. 2 3

See Hernandez v. Elm Ridge Apts., No. 03-15-00692-CV, 2016 WL 1039007 1

(Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 11, 2016, no pet. h.) (mem. op.).

 See Tex. R. App. P. 42 .1(a)(2)(A). 2

 See id. R. 42.1(d). 3
__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: April 6, 2016

2
#### § 102-71.25 Who must comply with GSA's real property policies?

Federal agencies operating under, or subject to, the authorities of the Administrator of General Services must comply with these policies.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO HAC VICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Susan E. Engel of the law firm Latham & Watkins LLP

appears as counsel for Defendant Lawrence Gene David, and requests that all papers served in this 

case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Per Rule 4(b)(4) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, Ms. Engel was previously admitted to 

appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen and 

states that all information provided in support of her initial pro hac vice motion remains current 

and correct, including the sponsoring co-counsel.

Dated: April 6, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida Bar No. 305596

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Lawrence Gene David

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-34.80 Where may we obtain help with our motor vehicle acquisition plans?

For help with your motor vehicle acquisition plans, contact the: General Services Administration, ATTN: MT, Washington, DC 20405. E-mail: *vehicle.policy@gsa.gov.*
§ 101-25.101-3 Supply through consolidated purchase for direct delivery to use points. The following criteria shall govern in determining whether an item can be most advantageously supplied through consolidated purchase for direct delivery to use points: ( a ) The items shall be equipment or supply items of such a character that it is feasible to forecast requirements for delivery to specific use points; and
( b ) Conditions exist where any of the following factors requires consolidated purchasing of such items for direct delivery to use points— ( 1 ) Where greatest price advantage, both direct and indirect costs considered, is obtainable through large definite quantity purchasing.
( 2 ) Where an item is of special manufacture or design and is not readily available from commercial sources.
( 3 ) Where market conditions are such that central procurement is required to assure adequate supply.
( 4 ) Where contracts for production quantities are necessary to secure timely deliveries and advantageous prices.
( 5 ) Where the quantity is large enough to assure lowest transportation costs or, conversely, where transportation costs for small quantity redistribution are so excessive that it is not feasible to store and issue the items.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF WHITE OAK  CORPORATION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
                      Chief Executive Officer Certification

                                   AT&T Corp.

                    Certifications Pursuant To Section 302 of
                         The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, David W. Dorman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AT&T ;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting ; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  January 8, 2004



                                       /s/  David W. Dorman
                                       -------------------------
                                       Chief Executive Officer
#### § 102-41.80 When is personal property voluntarily abandoned?

Personal property is voluntarily abandoned when the owner of the property intentionally and voluntarily gives up title to such property and title vests in the Government. The receiving agency ordinarily documents receipt of the property to evidence its voluntary relinquishment. Evidence of the voluntary abandonment may be circumstantial.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                            
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                       |  | /s/ Jeffrey D. Serkes      
|                       |  | Jeffrey D. Serkes          
|Date: November 4, 2005 |  | Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip M. McDermott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of AltiGen Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of AltiGen Communications, Inc.

Date: December 28, 2009By:

/s/ PHILIP M. MCDERMOTT Name: Philip M. McDermott
Title:Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the periodic report of Endocare, Inc. (the“Company”) onForm 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Michael R. Rodriguez, Senior Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of thedate hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United StatesCode, that to the best of my knowledge:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934, and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the    periods indicated.     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.     This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,“filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.     /s/ Michael R. Rodriguez       Michael R. Rodriguez     Senior Vice President, Finance and     Chief Financial Officer     (Principal Financial Officer)Date: March 16, 2006
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

and

COMBUSTION ENGJNEERlNG, INC.

TRADING AGREEMENT AND

ORDER NO. 8154 MODIFICATION

TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION

In the mat1er ofa Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner ofEnvironmental

Protection ("Commissioner") and Combustion Engineering, Inc. ("CE'l.

WHEREAS, the Commissioner and CE, having agreed to the terms and conditions set

forth in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8154 issued on December 11, 1997, do now, by

mutual agreement, modify Table 1 of paragraph AJ. as follows:

Change the STACK TEST RATE for Boiler No.3 when operating on No.6 fuel

oil from 0.504 IbslMMBtu to 0.338 IbslMMBru.

All other tenus and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order No. 8154 issued by the

Commissioner acting under Chapter 446c, Sections 22a-6, 22a-171, 22a-174, 22a-176, 22a-177

and 22a- J78 of the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

-

•

Respondent's Initials: KJY

(Prinlcd Ob Recycled Plpcr)

79 Elm StrCCt • Hartford, CT 06106 - 5127

bt!p:lld cp.$!I!C.CI.U$

All Equal Opporl/lllil)' Emplo)'~r

Date: S /'9,I~J
COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. 2 TRADING AGREEMENT

AND ORDER NO 8154

MODIFICATION

Combustion Engineering, Inc. hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading

Agreement and Order without further notice. ../

Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Signature: _~ii:J,,=!QOJ>~J.~S);,wAo...=;;j:=?;.~,,- _

Type Name: Richard D. Austin _

Type Title: Vice President and Secretary

.-

Date:

CITY OF WINDSOR

LAND RECORDS

MAlLED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Certified Document No.
#### § 102-41.175 May we sell unclaimed personal property?

Yes, you may sell unclaimed personal property after title vests in the Government (as provided for in § 102-41.120) and when there is no Federal interest. You may sell unclaimed personal property subject to the same terms and conditions as applicable to surplus personal property and in accordance with part 102-38 of this subchapter B.