alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,379
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,248
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    102,261
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           102,261
<LOANS>                                        196,485
<ALLOWANCE>                                        762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,620
<DEPOSITS>                                     151,353
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,103
<LONG-TERM>                                    134,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 320,620
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,857
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,340
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   232
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,429
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,910
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,091
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,338
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      156
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  19
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,010
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,010
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       548
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.12
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,256
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   415
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        4
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  762
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               762
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            762


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5558

To change the name of Medicare’s Medicare+Choice program to MedicareNo-Choice so as to explain more accurately to beneficiaries what the

program means.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To change the name of Medicare’s Medicare+Choice program

to Medicare-No-Choice so as to explain more accurately

to beneficiaries what the program means.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Truth in La5 beling Act of 2000’’.
2

HR 5558 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHANGE THE NAME OF MEDICARE’S

2 MEDICARE+CHOICE PROGRAM TO MEDICARE3 NO-CHOICE SO AS TO EXPLAIN MORE ACCU4 RATELY TO BENEFICIARIES WHAT THE PRO5 GRAM MEANS.

6 Title 18 of the Social Security Act is amended by sub7 stituting the phrase ‘‘Medicare-No-Choice’’ in each place

8 that the phrase ‘‘Medicare+Choice’’ appears.

Æ
§ 501.7 Postage Evidencing System requirements. ( a ) A Postage Evidencing System submitted to the Postal Service for approval must meet the requirements of the Intelligent Mail Indicia Performance Criteria (IMIPC) published by Commercial Payment. Copies of the current IMIPC may be requested via mail to the address in § 501.2(f).
( b ) The provider must affix to all meters a cautionary message providing the meter user with basic reminders on leasing and meter movement. ( 1 ) The cautionary message must be placed on all meters in a conspicuous and highly visible location. PROPERTY OF [NAME OF PROVIDER] as well as the provider's toll-free number must be emphasized by capitalized bold type and preferably printed in red. The minimum width of the message should be 3.25 inches, and the minimum height should be 1.75 inches. The message should read as follows: RENTED POSTAGE METER-NOT FOR SALE PROPERTY OF [NAME OF PROVIDER] (800) ###-#### Use of this meter is permissible only under U.S. Postal Service authorization. Call [Name of Provider] at (800) ###-#### to relocate/return this meter. WARNING! METER TAMPERING IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE. IF YOU SUSPECT METER TAMPERING, CALL POSTAL INSPECTORS AT (800) 372-8347 REWARD UP TO $50,000 for information leading to the conviction of any person who misuses postage meters resulting in the Postal Service not receiving correct postage payments.
( 2 ) Exceptions to the formatting of the required message are determined on a case-by-case basis. Any deviation from standardized meter message requirements must be approved in writing by the Postal Service.
( c ) The provider must ensure that any matter printed by a Postage Evidencing System, whether within the boundaries of the indicia or outside the clear zone as defined in DMM 604.4.0 and the Intelligent Mail Indicia Performance Criteria (IMI-PC), is: ( 1 ) Consistent with the Postal Service's intent to maintain neutrality on religious, social, political, legal, moral, or other public issues;
( 2 ) Is not obscene, deceptive, or defamatory of any person, entity, or group, and does not advocate unlawful action;
( 3 ) Does not emulate any form of valid postage, government, or other official indicia, or payment of postage; and
( 4 ) Does not harm the public image, reputation, or good will of the Postal Service and is not otherwise derogatory or detrimental to the interests of the Postal Service.
( d ) Providers must also ensure that customers acknowledge, agree, and warrant in writing that: ( 1 ) The customer bears full responsibility and liability for obtaining authorization to reproduce and otherwise use the matter as proposed (including, without limitation, any trademarks, slogans, likenesses or copyrighted material contained in the image);
( 2 ) The customer in fact has the legal authority to reproduce and otherwise use the matter as proposed; and
( 3 ) The customer understands that images or other matter is not provided, approved, or endorsed in any way by the Postal Service.
[71 FR 65733, Nov. 9, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 44439, July 24, 2013; 82 FR 60118, Dec. 19, 2017; 85 FR 21777, Apr. 20, 2020; 85 FR 78235, Dec. 4, 2020]
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J. " <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Joseph-J Dou g Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/22/2010 11:05 PM Subject: RE: OMB has concluded review of the NO2 NAAQS

The same to all of you.

Good night,

heidi

-----Original Message----- From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 11:04 PM To: King, Heidi R. Cc: Curry.Bridgid@epamail.epa.gov; Mancini, Dominic J.; Dougherty.Joseph-J@epamail.epa.gov; Montoro.Marta@epamail.epa.gov; Jenkins.Scott@epamail.epa.gov; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: OMB has concluded review of the NO2 NAAQS

Thank you, thank you, thank you. We so appreciate your fast review and your willingness to stay up so late working with us. Have a great

weekend!

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J."

<Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marta Montoro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA,

Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/22/2010 11:02 PM

Subject: OMB has concluded review of the NO2 NAAQSThank you all for your work on this. OMB has concluded review of the

NO2 NAAQS final rule.

heidi
#### § 230.39 Submission of claims.

Claims submitted pursuant to this subpart must be submitted on Postal Service Form 1503, which may be obtained from the Executive Special Agent in Charge who has custody of the property.
|    |                                                                                                         |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cheniere Energy, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                     |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                     |
|                                |
| /s/ Charif Souki                    |
| Charif SoukiChief Executive Officer |
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMERCO
and U-Haul International, Inc. (together, the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary
B. Horton, Treasurer of AMERCO and Assistant Treasurer of U-Haul
International, Inc. certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | AMERCO,                    
| | a Nevada corporation       
|
| | /s/ GARY B. HORTON         
| |                            
| | Gary B. Horton             
| | Treasurer                  
|
| | Date: September 9, 2003    
|
| | U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
| | a Nevada corporation       
|
| | /s/ GARY B. HORTON         
| |                            
| | Gary B. Horton             
| | Assistant Treasurer        
|
| | Date: September 9, 2003
#### § 102-117.145 What are coastwise laws?

Coastwise laws refer to laws governing shipment of freight, household goods and passengers by water between points in the United States or its territories. The purpose of these laws is to assure reliable shipping service and the existence of a maritime capability in times of war or national emergency (see section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, 46 U.S.C. Chapter 551, 19 CFR 4.80).

[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32322, May 31, 2022]
#### § 958.11 Respondent's access to information.

Except as provided in this section, after receiving the Notice of Docketing and Hearing the respondent may review and obtain a copy of all relevant and material documents, transcripts, records, and other materials which relate to the determination of liability by the Determining Official under 39 U.S.C. 3018, and all exculpatory information in the possession of the Determining Official relating to liability for civil penalties, clean-up costs and/or damages for mailing hazardous materials and/or related violations under 39 U.S.C. 3018. The respondent is not entitled to review or obtain a copy of any document, transcript, record, or other material which is privileged under Federal law. The Presiding Officer is authorized to issue orders placing limitations on the scope, method, time and place for accessing this information, and provisions for protecting the secrecy of confidential information or documents.
**EXHIBIT 21**SUBSIDIARIES OF DELTA APPAREL, INC.Listed below are the subsidiaries of Delta Apparel, Inc.:(1) M. J. Soffe Co., a North Carolina corporation. (2) Junkfood Clothing Company, a Georgia Corporation. (3) Delta Apparel Honduras, S.A., a Honduran sociedad anónima.   2,496 shares are owned by Delta Apparel, Inc. One (1) share is owned by each of fourdirectors of Delta Apparel, Inc. Delta Apparel, Inc. has the right to acquire suchdirector-owned shares at a nominal price. (At the time of the formation of Delta ApparelHonduras, S.A., Honduran law required a sociedad anónima to have at least five shareholders.) (4) Delta Campeche, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican sociedad anónima de capital variable.   49 shares are owned by Delta Apparel, Inc. One (1) share is owned by Robert W. Humphreys.Delta Apparel, Inc. has the right to acquire the share owned by Robert W. Humphreys at anominal price. (5) Delta Cortes, S.A., a Honduran sociedad anónima.   2,499 shares are owned by Delta Apparel, Inc. One (1) share is owned by Robert W.Humphreys. Delta Apparel, Inc. has the right to acquire the share owned by Robert W.Humphreys at a nominal price.(Honduran law has changed since the formation of Delta Apparel Honduras, S.A. and nowallows a sociedad anónima to have only two shareholders.) (6) SAIM, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of NorthCarolina (dissolved on July 6, 2006).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5638 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5638

  To amend section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 
provide that States have the final authority to establish guidelines to 
      determine which animal feeding operations are classified as 
  concentrated animal feeding operations for purposes of the national 
                pollutant discharge elimination system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 4, 2000

Mr. Smith of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 
provide that States have the final authority to establish guidelines to 
      determine which animal feeding operations are classified as 
  concentrated animal feeding operations for purposes of the national 
                pollutant discharge elimination system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 402 of the 
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations.--A State has the 
final authority to establish guidelines for determining which animal 
feeding operations in the State are classified as concentrated animal 
feeding operations for purposes of this section. The State's guidelines 
shall provide the factors to be considered in making such a 
determination, including number and concentration of animal units, the 
properties of the discharge (including the volume and frequency of the 
discharge and the type of pollutant), and other site-specific 
factors.''.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Bilal Burki v. Janette D. Dansby

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00044

- CV

Trial court case number: 21

- DCV

- 289522

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend Co unty

On January 25, 2022, a ppellant , Bilal Burki, filed a n “ Emergency Motion Requesting Stay of P roceedings in Trial Court Pending Appeal ” seeking a stay of all proceeding s in the trial
court, i ncluding collection actions by the court

- appointed receiver

, in Cause No. 21

- D CV

2 89522

, Janette D. Dansby v. Sheila Burki, individually and d/b/a Sheila Burki Wedding D écor and/or Sheila Burk i De signs, LLC; an d Bilal Burki, individually and d/b/a Sheila Burki Wedding
D écor

, and/or Sheila Burki Designs, LLC ; in the 268 th District Court of Fort Bend County,
Texas. We grant Appellants ’ motion for emergency relief and stay all trial court proceedings in C ause No. 21

- DCV

- 289522 pending final adjudication of the present appeal or until further o rder from this Court.

The Court requests a response from appellee , Janette D. Dansby, to the motion to sta y. The response , if any, is due ten days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_________ /s/ Julie Countiss

____________ A cting ind ividually

Date: January 26, 2022
July 13, 2015

Mr. Erik C. Johnson

Partner/Business Director

J2 Marketing, LLC

4609 Grape Road

Mishawaka, IN 46545

Dear Mr. Johnson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113(a) and (b), 91.103, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 

30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 19, 2015, exemption request on behalf of J2 Marketing, LLC into the 

public docket (No. FAA−2015−1706), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 101-27.207-1 Agency controls.

Agencies shall establish the necessary controls to identify shelf-life items on their stock records (and in other appropriate elements of their supply system), and shall determine the appropriate shelf life for other than GSA managed items. Shelf-life items shall be stored in such a way as to ensure that the oldest stock on hand is issued first. Agencies shall issue the oldest stock of shelf-life items first except when it is not feasible as in shipments to overseas activities.

[40 FR 59596, Dec. 29, 1975]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is _____________________________________.

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the 

FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC,

d/b/a Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively 

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River 

and the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is 

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein 

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by 

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Dated ______________, 2023. Signed:_________________________

Printed Name:____________________

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: _________________________________ Tel No.:___________________________

_________________________________ Email: ____________________________

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156 / brian@fairlawattorney.com

TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1 Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 209-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1176

TY BUSCH; DONNA BUSCH,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS; WILKERSON, Director; MOHR, Warden;

VOINIVICH, Governor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CA-98-302-V-3)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ty Busch, Donna Busch, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ty and Donna Busch appeal the district court’s orders denying

their motions to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing their

action without prejudice. The district court assessed a filing fee

and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to

comply with the fee order. See Busch v. Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation and Corrections, No. CA-98-302-V-3 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 1998).

Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED