alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GMAC Mortgage Corporation
500 Enterprise Road
Suite 150
P.O. Box 969
Horsham, PA 19044-0969


(LOGO) GMAC Mortgage

March 31, 2000

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
    preceding  fiscal  year under the terms of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
    Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and
    to the best of these Officers' knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled all of
    its  duties,   responsibilities   or  obligations   under  these  Agreements
    throughout  such  year,  or if there has been a default  or  failure  of the
    servicer to perform any of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a
    description of each default or failure and the nature and status thereof has
    been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
    servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
    Policy  and any  other  bonds  required  under  the  terms of the  Servicing
    Agreement,   Trust  Agreement,   Pooling  and  Servicing   Agreement  and/or
    Seller/Servicer Guide
    are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
    applicable) and Primary  Mortgage  Insurance  Policy (if  applicable),  with
    respect  to each  Mortgaged  Property,  have  been  paid  and  that all such
    insurance policies are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
    accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on
    any  Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses
    have not been paid with respect to any  Mortgaged  Property,  the reason for
    the non-payment has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
    required per section  6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue Code,
    respectively, have been prepared and filed.


Certified By:
Officer
Assistant Vice President
Title
March 29, 2000
Date
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 627 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 627

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
 wage and to provide for an increase in such wage based on the cost of 
                                living.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 1999

 Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
 wage and to provide for an increase in such wage based on the cost of 
                                living.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Liveable Wage Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

    (a) Rate Increase.--Section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act 
of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is amended by striking out ``and'' after 
``1996,'' and by inserting before the semicolon the following: ``, and 
not less than $6.50 an hour after December 30, 1999''.
    (b) Cost of Living Increase.--Section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards 
Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(g) At the beginning of each calendar year after December 30, 
1999, the Secretary shall adjust the rate applicable under subsection 
(a)(1) by the percentage increase which is applicable to the primary 
insurance amount under section 215(i) of the Social Security Act 
effective for benefits payable in January of such calendar year.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 35.4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Bank, FSB

American Express Credit Account Master Trust

Reporting Period January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of American Express Bank, FSB (AEFSB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related
Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2016, among TRS, AEFSB, American Express Centurion Bank, American Express Receivables Financing
Corporation III LLC and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation IV LLC, as acknowledged and accepted by American Express Receivables Financing Corporation II (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), does hereby certify
that:



|1. | AEFSB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | A review of AEFSBs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, AEFSB has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 9th day of March, 2017.



|                           |  |                                         
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                   
|Name:                      |  | Denise D. Roberts                       
|Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer                 
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Brady P. Bagley                     
|Name:                      |  | Brady P. Bagley                         
|Title:                     |  | Vice President  Controller, U S Banking
1 Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA) Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 4:56 PM To: 'Info@Singlewavemedia.com' Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pear son, Lakisha (FAA); Schandler, Andrea (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information

February 25, 2015

Mr. Erik Edgington Agent for Single Wave Media, LLC Single Wave Media, LLC 6929 Mildred Ave SE Grand Rapids, MI 49508

Dear Mr.Edgington:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1084). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft makes and models for th e proposed UAS operation. The descriptions should include the size. Please include the aircraft manuals.

 Provide description of proximity to airports.

 Your petition references a pre-flight inspection and/or checklist. Desc ribe the process used to determine if the UAS is airworthy and in sa fe condition for operation in the NAS.

 Describe the process used to document UAS discrepanc ies and the corrective acti on taken in the aircraft record. Examples of processes incl ude (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations.

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Motion Picture and Televisi on Operations Manual

o Flight Manual

o Operating Handbook

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by March 11, 2015. If we do not receiv e the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.2 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 604

To amend the charter of the AMVETS organization.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. STUMP (for himself and Mr. EVANS) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the charter of the AMVETS organization.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO AMVETS CHARTER.

4 (a) NAME OF ORGANIZATION.—(1) Sections

5 22701(a) and 22706 of title 36, United States Code, are

6 amended by striking ‘‘AMVETS (American Veterans of

7 World War II, Korea, and Vietnam)’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘AMVETS (American Veterans)’’.

9 (2)(A) The heading of chapter 227 of such title is

10 amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 604 IH

1 ‘‘CHAPTER 227—AMVETS (AMERICAN

2 VETERANS)’’.

3 (B) The item relating to such chapter in the table

4 of chapters at the beginning of subtitle II of such title

5 is amended to read as follows:

‘‘227. AMVETS (AMERICAN VETERANS) ......................................... 22701’’.

6 (b) GOVERNING BODY.—Section 22704(c)(1) of such

7 title is amended by striking ‘‘seven national vice com8 manders’’ and all that follows through ‘‘a judge advocate,’’

9 and inserting ‘‘two national vice commanders, a finance

10 officer, a judge advocate, a deputy judge advocate, a chap11 lain, a VAVS representative, six national district com12 manders,’’.

13 (c) HEADQUARTERS AND PRINCIPAL PLACE OF

14 BUSINESS.—Section 22708 of such title is amended—

15 (1) by striking ‘‘the District of Columbia’’ in

16 the first sentence and inserting ‘‘the Washington/

17 Baltimore Metropolitan area’’; and

18 (2) by striking ‘‘the District of Columbia’’ in

19 the second sentence and inserting ‘‘that metropolitan

20 area’’.

Æ
8040,5

FAA" 2..0 '0- eoo

09/29106

Contacts, With whom outside the FAA has this proposal bern discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

I'\alional BliSillc.~_~'\ir~rafl ,\ ••.~ocialion Eli CoHi ~-j,lro

1~~giu"31Aidinl· Assucialiull J)aH l.ullcnT ,-A/tv

Aircrafl Owncl-s& Pilots A~s"daliOIl Ro!Jl·rl H;lckmilll ,/c1u

,\TA ;\1 LllPez

~lto
§ 101-26.509-2 Requisitioning tabulating machine cards not available from Federal Supply Schedule contracts. ( a ) Requisitions for tabulating machine cards covered by Federal Supply Schedule contracts which exceed the maximum order limitation of the schedule shall be forwarded in FEDSTRIP format to the GSA regional office supporting the geographic area in which the requisitioner is located.
( b ) Requisitions for tabulating machine cards not covered by Federal Supply Schedule contracts shall be submitted to GSA for purchase action if the dollar value of the cards exceeds or is estimated to exceed $2,500. However, regardless of the amount involved (including requisitions estimated to be $2,500 or less), purchase action shall not be taken by GSA or an agency unless a waiver of the requirement for the use of tabulating cards available from Federal Supply Schedule contracts has been furnished in accordance with § 101-26.100-2. Requests for waivers shall be submitted to the Commissioner, Federal Supply Service (F), General Services Administration, Washington, DC 20406. The requests shall fully describe the items required and state the reasons the tabulating machine cards covered by the Federal Supply Schedule contracts will not adequately serve the end-use purpose. GSA will notify the requesting agency in writing of the action taken on the waiver request. To reduce leadtime, requisitions may be submitted in FEDSTRIP format with the requests for waivers. A requisition for items for which a waiver has first been obtained shall be submitted with a copy of the waiver to the GSA regional office supporting the geographic area in which the requisitioner is located. GSA will either arrange for procurement of the items or authorize the requesting activity to procure them.
( c ) Purchase requests with established delivery dates should allow sufficient leadtime (see § 101-26.102-3) to permit orderly procurement by GSA, including acceptance testing and delivery to destination.
( d ) In those instances where an agency anticipates a need for scheduled deliveries, minimum or maximum order quantities, or other special arrangements, GSA will develop specific provisions to accommodate the needs of the particular agency. These provisions will be based on information furnished by the agency concerned for inclusion in solicitations for offers and resultant contracts.
[35 FR 13440, Aug. 22, 1970, as amended at 43 FR 22212, May 24, 1978; 43 FR 32766, July 28, 1978]
## Attachment Baltimore NAA and Maryland 

## Zero Emissions Modeling, and Washington DC NAA Only 

## Emissions Modeling Results Modeling Completed by University of Maryland College Park (UMD) for the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)Baltimore NAA Zero - Out EmissionsBaltimore NAA Zero - Out EmissionsBaltimore NAA Zero - Out EmissionsBaltimore NAA Zero - Out EmissionsBaltimore NAA Zero - Out EmissionsBaltimore NAA Zero - Out EmissionsMaryland Zero - Out EmissionsMaryland Zero - Out EmissionsMaryland Zero - Out EmissionsMaryland Zero - Out EmissionsMaryland Zero - Out EmissionsMaryland Zero - Out EmissionsWashington DC NAA Only EmissionsWashington DC NAA Only EmissionsWashington DC NAA Only EmissionsWashington DC NAA Only EmissionsWashington DC NAA Only EmissionsWashington DC NAA Only Emissions
§ 102-34.215 May Government contractors use Government motor vehicles? Yes, Government contractors may use Government motor vehicles when authorized in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), GSA Fleet procedures, and the following conditions: ( a ) Government motor vehicles are used for official purposes only and solely in the performance of the contract;
( b ) Government motor vehicles cannot be used for transportation between residence and place of employment, unless authorized in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 1344 and part 102-5 of this chapter; and
( c ) Contractors must: ( 1 ) Establish and enforce suitable penalties against employees who use, or authorize the use of, Government motor vehicles for unofficial purposes or for other than in the performance of the contract; and
( 2 ) Pay any expenses or cost, without Government reimbursement, for using Government motor vehicles other than in the performance of the contract.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-23074-CIV-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

for himself and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC, 

d/b/a KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

__________________________________________/ 

ORDER 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff Octavio Collado’s (“Plaintiff”) Notice 

of Discovery Hearing [D.E. 200]. This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636 by the Honorable Beth Bloom, United States District Judge [D.E. 26]. The 

undersigned held a hearing on this matter on September 6, 2023 (hereafter, “Hearing”). In 

accordance with the rulings at the Hearing, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses 

[D.E. 201] from Defendants 450 North River Drive LLC, d/b/a Kiki on the River (“450 North 

River Drive”) and Roman Jones (“Jones”) (together, “Defendants”) is GRANTED IN PART as 

follows: 

1. As to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production Nos. 15 and 16, Defendants’ objections 

are SUSTAINED. 

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 203 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2 

2. As to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production Nos. 23 and 28, Defendants SHALL 

AMEND their responses as agreed at the Hearing.

It is further 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant 450 North River Drive’s Motion to Compel 

Discovery Responses from Opt-in Plaintiffs [D.E. 202] is GRANTED IN PART. Each of the Optin Plaintiffs (as identified through the close of the opt-in period) SHALL FULLY RESPOND to 

Interrogatories Nos. 1, 5, and 6. As to Interrogatories Nos. 2, 3, and 4, the Opt-in Plaintiffs may 

answer those common interrogatories on a representative basis; and those answers shall bind all of 

the Opt-in Plaintiffs. It is further 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties shall meet and confer regarding the Opt-in 

Plaintiffs’ pending responses to Defendant 450 North River Drive’s Requests for Production Nos. 

1-10; and shall attempt to resolve their disputes by applying the foregoing Interrogatory rulings to 

the Requests for Productions. Thereafter, the parties may bring any unresolved disputes to the 

undersigned’s attention in accordance with the discovery procedures governing this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 6th day of September, 2023. 

________________________________ 

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: United States District Judge Beth Bloom 

 Counsel of Record 

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 203 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 101-1.101 Federal Property Management Regulations System.

The Federal Property Management Regulations System described in this subpart is established and shall be used by General Services Administration (GSA) officials and, as provided in this subpart, by other executive agency officials, in prescribing regulations, policies, procedures, and delegations of authority pertaining to the management of property, and other programs and activities of the type administered by GSA, except procurement and contract matters contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR).

[54 FR 37652, Sept. 12, 1989]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik and each of them, his true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and
each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do
in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.



                                                        /s/ Donald E. Steen
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Donald E. Steen

                                                        February 18, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/Torres

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

for himself and all others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC, et al.,

 Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER REFERRING MOTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Magistrate Judge Rule 1, it is ORDERED that 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions, ECF No. [255], is REFERRED to Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin 

G. Torres.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on June 21, 2024.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 256 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/21/2024 Page 1 of 1
#### THOMAS E. SMITH, Respondent, *v.*THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY, Appellant.

Appeal from an order made at the Special Term, referring this cause to a referee to hear and determine. The General Term reversed the order on the ground that the action was not referable.

*Close &*Robertson, for the appellant.

--, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Gilbert, J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Tappen, JJ;

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

AUTOLOGIC INFORMATION INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 21.1--SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following is a list of the subsidiaries and joint ventures of the Company as
of January 17, 1998 (exclusive of certain subsidiaries which, if considered in
the aggregate, would not, as of October 31, 1997, constitute a significant
subsidiary within the meaning of Rule 1-02(v) of Regulation S-X). All of such
subsidiaries, to the extent they were active during fiscal 1996, are included as
consolidated subsidiaries in the Registrant's consolidated financial statements
as of October 31, 1997.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Jurisdiction
                                                                        of
Name (1)                                                          Incorporation
--------                                                          -------------
<S>                                                               <C>
Xitron, Incorporated                                              Michigan
Autologic Triple-I, Inc.                                          Canada
Autologic Information International, Limited                      United Kingdom
Autologic Information International, A.B.                         Sweden
Autologic Information International, Ltd.                         Israel
Autologic Information International, Pty Limited                  Australia
Information International Incorporated Ltd.                       United Kingdom
Information International Incorporated S.A.                       France
Information International Overseas Corporation                    California
Information International Foreign Sales Corporation               Guam
Autologic Information International Ltd.                          Nevada
</TABLE>

--------------------

(1) Except as noted, each named subsidiary is wholly owned, directly or
indirectly, by the Company, except that in the case of certain foreign
subsidiaries, qualifying shares may be registered in the name of directors
and/or other subsidiaries of the Company.