alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    The Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency announce a public meeting to be held on June 29, 2000 at 10:00 a.m. at 1425 New York Ave., NW., 13th Floor Conference Room, Washington, DC. The subject of the meeting will be implementation of the provisions of seven consent decrees signed by the United States and diesel engine manufacturers and entered by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on July 1, 1999. In supporting entry by the Court of the decrees, the United States committed to meet with states, industry groups, environmental groups, and concerned citizens to discuss consent decree implementation issues. This will be the fourth of a series of public meetings to be held quarterly during the first year of implementation of the consent decrees and at least annually thereafter. Future meetings will be announced in the                     **Federal Register**                     and/or on EPA's Diesel Engine Settlement web page at: www.epa.gov/​oeca/​ore/​aed/​diesel.                 

For further information, please contact: Anne Wick, EPA Diesel Engine Consent Decree Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Mail Code 2242A), EPA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20460, e-mail: WICK.ANNE@EPA.GOV.

Joel M. Gross,

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 00-15590 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,844,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               61,916,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 19,063,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            94,966,000
<PP&E>                                       3,780,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,750,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       64,550,000
<BONDS>                                      5,629,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,490,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,028,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,139,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               103,750,000
<SALES>                                    152,388,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           152,388,000
<CGS>                                      119,350,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              119,350,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,622,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,010,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,406,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,817,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,589,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,589,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 1995
and Consolidated Statement of Income for the nine months ended 
September 30, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to 
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           1,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                       569
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,940
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,419
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   429
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    212
<INCOME-TAX>                                        74
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                138
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
§ 102-33.205 When we use our aircraft to support other executive agencies, must we recover the operating costs? Yes, you must recover the following: ( a ) Under 31 U.S.C. 1535 and other statutes, you may be required to recover the costs of operating aircraft in support of other agencies. Depending on the statutory authorities under which you acquired and operate your aircraft, you will use either of the following two methods for establishing the rates charged for using your aircraft: ( 1 ) The variable cost recovery rate; or
( 2 ) The full cost recovery rate.
( b ) See the U.S. Government Aircraft Cost Accounting Guide (CAG) (*http://www.gsa.gov/aviationpolicy*), for the definitions of “variable cost recovery rate” and “full cost recovery rate.”
#### § 102-33.425 What Federal aircraft cost and utilization data must we report?

You must report certain costs for each of your Federal aircraft (including your UAS) and the number of hours that you flew each aircraft. In reporting the costs of your Federal aircraft, you must report both the amounts you paid as Federal costs, which are for services the Government provides, and the amounts you paid for commercial aviation services (CAS) in support of your Federal aviation program. For a list and definitions of the Federal aircraft cost and utilization data elements, see the U.S. Government Aircraft Cost Accounting Guide (CAG), which is available at *http://www.gsa.gov/aviationpolicy.*
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10067

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Marco Antonio Lopez-Lopez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:19-CR-91-1

Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marco Antonio 

Lopez-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Lopez has not filed a response. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 28, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10067 Document: 00515880848 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/28/2021
No. 20-10067

2

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

However, we note that, although Lopez-Lopez was convicted and 

sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1), the written judgment cites 

only to § 1326(a). Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the clerical 

error in the written judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 36. See United States v. Cooper, 979 F.3d 1084, 1088-89 (5th Cir. 

2020), cert. denied, 2021 WL 1073631 (U.S. Mar. 22, 2021) (No. 20-7122). 

Case: 20-10067 Document: 00515880848 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/28/2021
§ 102-118.435 What are the transportation postpayment audit roles and responsibilities of the GSA Transportation Audits Division? ( a ) The GSA Transportation Audits Division role is to perform the oversight responsibility of transportation prepayment and postpayment granted to the Administrator. The GSA Transportation Audits Division will— ( 1 ) Examine and analyze transportation documents and payments to discover their validity, relevance and conformity with tariffs, quotations, contracts, agreements, or tenders and make adjustments to protect the interest of an agency;
( 2 ) Examine, adjudicate, and settle transportation claims by and against the agency;
( 3 ) Collect from TSPs by refund, setoff, offset, or other means, the amounts determined to be due the agency;
( 4 ) Adjust, terminate, or suspend debts due on TSP overcharges;
( 5 ) Prepare reports to the Attorney General of the United States with recommendations about the legal and technical bases available for use in prosecuting or defending suits by or against an agency and provide technical, fiscal, and factual data from relevant records;
( 6 ) Provide transportation specialists and lawyers to serve as expert witnesses; assist in pretrial conferences; draft pleadings, orders, and briefs; and participate as requested in connection with transportation suits by or against an agency;
( 7 ) Review agency policies, programs, and procedures to determine their adequacy and effectiveness in the audit of freight or passenger transportation payments, and review related fiscal and transportation practices;
( 8 ) Furnish information on rates, fares, routes, and related technical data upon request;
( 9 ) Inform an agency of irregular shipping routing practices, inadequate commodity descriptions, excessive transportation cost authorizations, and unsound principles employed in traffic and transportation management; and
( 10 ) Confer with individual TSPs or related groups and associations presenting specific modes of transportation to resolve mutual problems concerning technical and accounting matters, and providing information on requirements.
( b ) The Administrator of General Services may provide transportation audit and related technical assistance services, on a reimbursable basis, to any other agency. Such reimbursements may be credited to the appropriate revolving fund or appropriation from which the expenses were incurred (31 U.S.C. 3726(j)).
§ 3010.165 Motions for reconsideration. ( a ) Any person may file a motion requesting reconsideration of a final order by the Commission.
( b ) The motion shall be filed within 15 days of the issuance of the final order that is the subject of the motion and must: ( 1 ) Briefly and specifically allege material errors of fact or law and the relief sought; and
( 2 ) Be confined to new questions raised by the determination or action ordered and upon which the moving party had no prior opportunity to submit arguments.
( c ) Upon filing a motion for reconsideration, the underlying Commission order is not deemed to be final for purposes of 39 U.S.C. 3663 until final disposition of the motion.
[87 FR 43214, July 20, 2022]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 23, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00297

- CR

Kevin DEBNAM

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court

, B exar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR6484 Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on July 16, 2021. Neither the clerk’s record nor a supplemental clerk’s record filed in this court contains a final judgment. The deputy clerk of

this court contacted the trial court clerk and was informed the se ntencing hearing was set for September 13, 2021. Upon subsequent inquiries, the deputy clerk was informed that the September 13, 2021 sentencing hearing was continued, and there is currently no date scheduled for the appellant’s sentencing hearing. Absen t a final judgment or other appealable order, this court has no jurisdiction. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order why this appeal should be not di smissed for lack of jurisdiction. All appellate deadlines in this appeal are suspended pending further order of the court.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rod riguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 23rd day of November, 2021

.___________________________________ MIC HAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
FORM 10-Q

                     PART II.   OTHER INFORMATION
               AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            June 28, 1997


Item 6.    Exhibits
-------------------
     (11)  STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                Three  Months Ended     Six  Months Ended 
                                      June  28,             June  28,
                                        1997                  1997
                                     -----------           -----------
                                 (000's  omitted, except per share data)
<S>                                <C>                    <C>
Primary:

 Average shares outstanding            3,631                  3,631

 Net effect of dilutive
  stock options-based on
  the treasury stock method
  using average market price             102                   107
                                    --------               -------
               Totals                  3,733                 3,738
                                    ========               =======

 Net income                         $   884                $   931
                                    ========              ========
 Per share amount                   $   .24                $   .25
                                    ========              ========
Fully diluted:

 Average shares outstanding           3,631                  3,631

 Net effect of dilutive
  stock options-based on
  the treasury stock method
  using the higher of quarter-end
  or average market price for
  each quarter                          102                    120
                                    --------               -------- 
               Totals                 3,733                  3,751
                                    ========               ========

 Net income                         $   884                $   931
                                    ========               ========
 Per share amount                   $   .24                $   .25
                                    ========               ========
   Note:  There was no dilutive effect from stock options in 1996.
          Weighted average shares outstanding for the three months
          and six months ended June 29, 1996 were 3,647,989 and
          3,659,236, respectively.



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Pacific-Northwest Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held in Medford, Oregon. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Saturday, June 24, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Judi Nicholas at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that an open meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held Saturday, June 24, 2000, 9 a.m. to Noon at the Metropoliton Convention Center, 2500 Crater Lake Highway, Medford, OR 97504. The public is invited to make oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 10 minutes. If you would like to have the CAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write Judi Nicholas, CAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, Room 442, Seattle, WA 98174. Due to limited conference space, notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Judi Nicholas. Ms. Nicholas can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096. 

The Agenda will include the following: various IRS issue updates. 

# Note:

Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could prevent effective advance notice.

Dated: May 26, 2000. 

M. Cathy Vanhorn, 

Director, CAP, Communications & Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 00-15046 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

____Julian Garzon____________________/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is __Julian Garzon__________________.

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the FLSA,

29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC, d/b/a

Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River and

the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Dated _August 23rd______, 2023. Signed:___Julian Garzon ____________ Printed

Name:Julian Garzon______________

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: 400 nw 1st ave apt 1811 Miami,FL 33128 Tel No.:786-538-6977_

_________________________________ Email: _jgarz009@fiu.edu_________

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 195-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 195-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 2 of 2 /brian@fairlawattorney.com TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844
^oT- osr-Do62-il^HL 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Readerexp @ aol.com 

Monday, April 19, 2010 9:41 PM 

EAS (OST) 

RE: Altoona-Blair Co. Airport 

We prefer any airline selected for Altoona-Blair Co. PA airport go to Washington-Dulles; however, our main criteria is that 

any airline selected be as safe as possible. We are not interested in flights going to Ohio. 

John/Sally Jackson 

- 1 1 

••'CD 

CD