alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 590 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 590

    To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Largent, Ms. Rivers, Mrs. 
Emerson, Mr. Hostettler, and Mr. Goode) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
U.S.C. 31) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (2) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``(1) The'' and inserting ``The'';
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (C) 
                as paragraphs (1) through (3), respectively; and
                    (C) by striking ``, as adjusted by paragraph (2) of 
                this subsection''.
                                 <all>
```
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC D/B/A 

KIKI ON THE RIVER, RJ RIVER AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Hiosmel Zayas) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Hiosmel Zayas.

Dated this 9

th day of March 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 620 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 620

    To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a test to 
 determine the costs and benefits of requiring jet-propelled aircraft 
 taking off from Newark International Airport, New Jersey, to conduct 
            ascents over the ocean, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 1999

     Mr. Franks (for himself, Mr. Frelinghuysen, and Mrs. Roukema) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a test to 
 determine the costs and benefits of requiring jet-propelled aircraft 
 taking off from Newark International Airport, New Jersey, to conduct 
            ascents over the ocean, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEST OF AIRCRAFT OCEAN ROUTING.

    In order to examine an option for reducing aircraft noise over 
communities in New Jersey, the Secretary of Transportation shall 
conduct a 6-month live test to determine the costs and benefits of 
requiring jet-propelled aircraft to conduct ascents after taking off 
from Newark International Airport, New Jersey, over the ocean. The 
Secretary shall commence such test not later than 45 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Transportation shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the test conducted under section 1. The report shall include 
an analysis of the effects on noise reduction of ocean routing of 
aircraft taking off from Newark International Airport and any 
recommendations and comments of the Secretary concerning ocean routing 
of air carrier aircraft taking off from Newark International Airport.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 624 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 624

 To amend section 101 of title 11 of the United States Code to modify 
   the definition of single asset real estate and to make technical 
                              corrections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 1999

 Mr. Knollenberg introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 101 of title 11 of the United States Code to modify 
   the definition of single asset real estate and to make technical 
                              corrections.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Single Asset Bankruptcy Reform Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 101 of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (51B) by striking ``having'' and all that 
        follows through ``$4,000,000'',
            (2) in paragraph (35)(B) by striking ``paragraphs (21B) and 
        (33)(A)'' and inserting ``paragraphs (23) and (35)'',
            (3) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (12A) as 
        paragraphs (3) through (12), respectively, and
            (4) by redesignating paragraphs (21A) through (55) as 
        paragraphs (22) through (66), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
§ 102-74.600 Should Federal agencies utilize telework centers? Yes. In accordance with Public Law 107-217 (August 21, 2002), each of the following departments and agencies, in each fiscal year, must make at least $50,000 available from amounts provided for salaries and expenses for carrying out a flexiplace work telecommuting program (i.e., to pay telework center program user fees): ( a ) Department of Agriculture.
( b ) Department of Commerce.
( c ) Department of Defense.
( d ) Department of Education.
( e ) Department of Energy.
( f ) Department of Health and Human Services.
( g ) Department of Housing and Urban Development.
( h ) Department of the Interior.
( i ) Department of Justice.
( j ) Department of Labor.
( k ) Department of State.
( l ) Department of Transportation.
( m ) Department of the Treasury.
( n ) Department of Veterans Affairs.
( o ) Environmental Protection Agency.
( p ) General Services Administration.
( q ) Office of Personnel Management.
( r ) Small Business Administration.
( s ) Social Security Administration.
( t ) United States Postal Service.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Mark A. Kopser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company./s/ Mark A. Kopser
Exhibit 32
                        American Airlines, Inc.
                             Certification
       Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                          United States Code)


Pursuant   to  section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act   of   2002
(subsections  (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63  of  title  18,
United  States  Code), each of the undersigned officers  of  American
Airlines,  Inc.,  a Delaware corporation (the Company),  does  hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
(the  Form  10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information  contained  in  the Form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in  all
material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date:  July 24, 2007               /s/ Gerard J. Arpey
                                       Gerard J. Arpey
                                       Chairman, President and Chief
                                       Executive Officer

Date:  July 24, 2007               /s/ Thomas W. Horton
                                       Thomas W. Horton
                                       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer



The  foregoing  certification is being furnished solely  pursuant  to
section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections  (a)  and
(b)  of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and
is  not  being  filed  as  part of the Form 10-Q  or  as  a  separate
disclosure document.
On appellant’s motion for reconsideration filed March 21,

reconsideration allowed; decision (133 Or App 448, 890 P2d 1016) vacated;

affirmed September 13, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*RODNEY THOMAS, *Appellant.*

(CR93-50818; CA A81837)

901 P2d 990

Alan H. Biedermann, Deputy Public Defender, for motion.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; decision vacated; affirmed. *State v. Flowers,*136 Or App 555, 902 P2d 624 (1995).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8489-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8533-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8534-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8547-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8548-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8549-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8550-BER

IN RE: SEALED SEARCH WARRANTS

__________________________________________/

OMNIBUS ORDER 

Media organizations (“the Media Coalition”) filed a motion to intervene and to 

unseal search warrant materials in each of the above-captioned matters. In its ex 

parte sealed responses, the Government does not oppose partially unsealing these 

materials. I have reviewed the motion, the Government’s responses, and the sealed 

materials. There is good cause to continue partially sealing the search warrant 

materials to protect (1) investigative sources and methods, including the identity of 

witnesses, (2) the identities of uncharged persons, and (3) grand jury materials. 

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED that:

1. The following Motions to Intervene and to Unseal Search Warrant 

Materials are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART:

Case Number Docket Entry

22-MJ-8489-BER 6

22-MJ-8533-BER 6

22-MJ-8534-BER 6

22-MJ-8547-BER 5

22-MJ-8548-BER 5

Case 9:22-mj-08550-BER Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

22-MJ-8549-BER 5

22-MJ-8550-BER 6

The Media Coalition is granted leave to intervene. The search warrant materials 

shall be partially unsealed. The Government’s proposed redactions are adopted. On 

or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on August 28, 2023, the Government shall file the 

redacted materials on the public docket in each matter.

2. The following Government’s motions to seal responses are GRANTED:

Case Number Docket Entry

22-MJ-8489-BER 11

22-MJ-8533-BER 12

22-MJ-8534-BER 11

22-MJ-8547-BER 10

22-MJ-8548-BER 10

22-MJ-8549-BER 10

22-MJ-8550-BER 11

On or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on September 1, 2023, the Government shall file 

under seal proposed redacted versions of its ex parte responses.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach 

County, in the Southern District of Florida, this 23rd day of August 2023.

__________________________________

BRUCE E. REINHART

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 9:22-mj-08550-BER Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 2 of 2
Shane Dermanjian

Shane Dermanjian is a research analyst at AmeriCorps’ Office of Research and Evaluation (ORE). In this role, Shane analyzes member survey data, manages ORE’s research grantee portfolio, and assists other departments in the evaluation of their programs. Prior to joining AmeriCorps as staff, Shane served two AmeriCorps service terms including environmental conservation and education on Cape Cod, MA, and rebuilding homes destroyed by Superstorm Sandy along the New Jersey shore. Shane holds his MS in Public Policy and Management from Carnegie Mellon University. 

# image1.jpg
§ 102-33.420 How must we declassify a Federal aircraft? To declassify a Federal aircraft, you must— ( a ) Send a letter to the Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Asset and Transportation Management, Office of Government-wide Policy, General Services Administration, 1800 F St. NW., Washington, DC 20405, that requests approval to declassify the aircraft and states that the aircraft is non-operational (which includes lost or destroyed). In this letter you must— ( 1 ) Identify the Federal Supply Classification (FSC) group(s) that the declassified aircraft/parts will fall under, if applicable;
( 2 ) Describe the condition of the aircraft (crash-damaged, unrecoverable, parts unavailable, etc.); and
( 3 ) Include photographs as appropriate.
( b ) Within 14 calendar days of receiving GSA's approval to declassify the aircraft, following 14 CFR 45.13, request approval from your local FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) to remove the manufacturer's data plate;
( c ) Within 14 calendar days of receiving approval from FAA to remove the data plate, inform GSA of FAA's approval, send the data plate by courier or registered mail to the FAA, as directed by your FSDO, and remove the certificate of airworthiness and the aircraft's registration form from the aircraft, complete the reverse side of the registration form, and send both documents to The FAA Aircraft Registration Branch, P.O. Box 25504, Oklahoma City, OK 73125-0504; and
( d ) Update the FAIRS inventory record to reflect disposal status and update your personal property records, deleting the declassified aircraft from the aircraft category and adding it to another Federal Supply Classification group or groups, as appropriate.
|    |                                                                                                         |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cheniere Energy, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                           |
|-------------------------------------------|
|                                           |
|                                      |
| /s/ Michael J. Wortley                    |
| Michael J. WortleyChief Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 668 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 668

 To establish a uniform closing time for the operation of polls on the 
       date of the election of the President and Vice President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 1999

  Mr.  Campbell (for himself and Mr. Lantos) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish a uniform closing time for the operation of polls on the 
       date of the election of the President and Vice President.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Uniform Poll Closing Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF UNIFORM POLL CLOSING TIME ON PRESIDENTIAL 
              ELECTION DAY.

    For each election of a President and Vice President held on the 
Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November (beginning with the 
election in 2000), the polls in each State and the District of Columbia 
shall close at 11 p.m. eastern standard time.
                                 <all>
```
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 1 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 2 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 3 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 4 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 5 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 6 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 7 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 8 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 9 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 10 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 11 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 12 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 13 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 14 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 15 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 16 of 17
Case 9:22-cr-80185-DMM Document 46-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2023 Page 17 of 17
§ 102-118.375 Can GSA suspend my agency's transportation prepayment audit program? ( a ) Yes. The Director of the GSA Transportation Audits Division may suspend your agency's transportation prepayment audit program until the agency corrects their prepayment audit program deficiencies. This suspension may be in whole or in part. If GSA suspends your agency's transportation prepayment audit and GSA assumes responsibility for auditing an agencies prepayment audit program, the agency will reimburse GSA for the expense.
( b ) This suspension determination is based on identification of a systematic or frequent failure of the agency's transportation prepayment audit program to— ( 1 ) Conduct a prepayment audit of your agency's transportation bills; and/or
( 2 ) Abide by the terms of the Prompt Payment Act (31 U.S.C. 3901, *et seq.*);
( 3 ) Adjudicate TSP claims disputing prepayment audit positions of the agency regularly within 30 calendar days of receipt;
( 4 ) Follow Comptroller General decisions, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals decisions, the Federal Management Regulation and GSA instructions or precedents about substantive and procedure matters; and/or
( 5 ) Provide information and data or to cooperate with on-site inspections necessary to conduct a quality assurance review.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Kennelly, Appellant.

May 14, 1914:

Per Curiam,

The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by the learned judge specially presiding in his opinion overruling the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment and for new trial, and the record is remitted to the court of quarter sessions of Allegheny county with direction that the judgment be fully carried into effect, and to that end it is ordered that the defendant forthwith appear in that court and that he be by that court committed to comply with such part of his sentence as had not been served and complied with at the time this appeal was made a supersedeas.
#### § 102-118.420 Is my agency allowed to perform a postpayment audit on our transportation documents?

No. Your agency may not perform a transportation postpayment audit unless granted an exemption and specifically directed to do so by the Administrator in lieu of a prepayment audit. Whether such an exemption is granted or not, your agency must forward all transportation documents (TD) to GSA for postpayment audit (see § 102-118.35 for definition TD).