alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-20540-CR-ALTONAGA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DELVIS LARA FUENTES, et. al.,

Defendant.

______________________________/

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

Comes now the Defendant, Delvis Lara Fuentes, joined by the co-defendants in this case, by 

and through undersigned counsel and files this Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial and in 

support thereof states:

1. This case is scheduled for a Calendar Call February 21, 2023. A Jury Trial is scheduled 

in this case for, February 27, 2023.

2. The government has provided the defense with three productions of discovery. 

3. It has advised that there is another discovery production that contains approximately 350

gigabytes of evidence.

4. Counsel provided an external hard drive to the government in order to receive this latest 

discovery.

5. All counsel need additional time to review this latest discovery production with their 

respective clients and also need additional time to prepare for trial. 

Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2023 Page 1 of 2
6. Counsel spoke with Assistant United States Attorney, Maria Catala, regarding the content

of this motion and discussed a proposed trial date. Ms. Catala stated that she did not 

oppose this motion.

7. Additionally, counsel also spoke to Mr. Alfredo Izaguirre and Mr. Jean-Michel 

D’Escoubet, counsels for the other two co-defendants in this case. Both counsels stated 

that they join this Motion to Continue the Trial.

8. The defense moves for a 60 day continuance of the trial date and would ask for a calendar 

call and a trial date in late April. 

WHEREFORE, undersigned counsel prays this Honorable Court enter its Order granting this 

motion.

Respectfully submitted, 

OMAR A. LOPEZ, P.A.

848 Brickell Avenue, Suite 602

Miami, FL 33131

T:305.789.4430

F:305.503.9521

Email: omar@omarlopezlaw.com

By: Omar A. Lopez 

 Omar A. Lopez, Esquire

 Florida Bar No. 017870 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was on this 10th day 

of February 2023, furnished to all interested parties via the CF/ECF filing system.

Omar A. Lopez, Esquire

Omar A. Lopez, Esquire

Case 1:22-cr-20540-CMA Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 3050.3 Access to information supporting Commission reports or evaluations. ( a ) The Commission shall have access to material if, in its judgment, the information supports any report, assessment, or evaluation required by title 39 of the United States Code, including: ( 1 ) The working papers and supporting matter of the Postal Service or the Postal Service Inspector General in connection with any information submitted under 39 U.S.C. 3652; and
( 2 ) Information that supports the Commission's annual assessment under 39 U.S.C. 3651.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 102-80.50 Are Federal agencies responsible for identifying/estimating risks and for appropriate risk reduction strategies?

Yes, Federal agencies must identify and estimate safety and environmental management risks and appropriate risk reduction strategies for buildings. Federal agencies occupying as well as operating buildings must identify any safety and environmental management risks and report or correct the situation, as appropriate. Federal agencies must use the applicable national codes and standards as a guide for their building operations.
Exhibit 31(b)



CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Teresa B. Dickey, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NMXS.com, Inc.



2.  Based on my knowledge, this amended yearly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended yearly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended yearly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended yearly report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the a registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended yearly report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended yearly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



(c) presented in this amended yearly report my conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date





5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and



(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.   I have indicated in this amended yearly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated:
October 18, 2005



/s/ Teresa B. Dickey

Teresa B. Dickey

Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 15.1





February 7, 2008








Aceto Corporation


Lake Success, New
York






We are aware that Aceto Corporation and
subsidiaries has incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 33-38679, No. 333-90929, and No. 333-110653) our report dated
February 7, 2008,relating to the Company’s unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements appearing in its quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. Pursuant to Regulation C
under the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the
registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or
certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. It
should be noted that we have not performed any procedures subsequent to February
7, 2008.








/s/ BDO SEIDMAN LLP





Melville, New
York
# AGENCY:

 Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# ACTION:

 Extension of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

                         On November 26, 1999, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) published in the                         **Federal Register**                         a request for public comment on a proposal to revise its procedures for the review of contract market rules and rule amendments (64 FR 66428). The original comment period expires January 25, 2000. By letter dated January 3, 2000, seven agricultural organizations requested a thirty day extension of the comment period to permit the membership of each organization to fully consider the implications of the proposed procedures.[1] 

The Commission has determined to extend the comment period for thirty days in order to insure that an adequate opportunity is provided for submission of meaningful comments.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

 Written comments must be received on or before February 24, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

 Comments on the proposal should be sent to Jean A. Webb, Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581. Comments may be sent by facsimile transmission to (202) 418-5521, or by e-mail to secretary @cftc.gov. Reference should be made to “Procedure for the Review of Contract Market Rules”.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 David P. Van Wagner, Associate Director, Division of Trading and Markets, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW, Washington, DC 20581. Telephone Number: (202) 418-5490. Facsimile Number: (202) 418-5536. Electronic Mail: tm@cftc.gov.

Issued in Washington, D.C. on January 18, 2000 by the Commission.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                                 The request was made in a January 3, 2000 letter jointly signed by the American Farm Bureau Federation, the American Soybean Association, the National Association of Wheat Growers, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, the National Corn Grower's Association, the National Farmers Union, and the National Pork Producers Council.                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-1568 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5406

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for rank awards for certain

senior career employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 2000

Mr. WOLF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for rank

awards for certain senior career employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RANK AWARDS FOR CERTAIN SENIOR CAREER

4 EMPLOYEES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 5, United States Code, is

6 amended by inserting after section 4507 the following:

7 ‘‘§ 4507a. Awarding of ranks to other senior career

8 employees

9 ‘‘(a) For the purpose of this section, the term ‘senior

10 career employee’ means an individual appointed to a posi-
2

•HR 5406 IH

1 tion classified above GS–15 and paid under section 5376

2 who is not serving—

3 ‘‘(1) under a time-limited appointment; or

4 ‘‘(2) in a position that is excepted from the

5 competitive service because of its confidential or pol6 icy-making character.

7 ‘‘(b) Each agency employing senior career employees

8 shall submit annually to the Office of Personnel Manage9 ment recommendations of senior career employees in the

10 agency to be awarded the rank of Meritorious Senior Pro11 fessional or Distinguished Senior Professional, which may

12 be awarded by the President for sustained accomplishment

13 or sustained extraordinary accomplishment, respectively.

14 ‘‘(c) The recommendations shall be made, reviewed,

15 and awarded under the same terms and conditions (to the

16 extent determined by the Office of Personnel Manage17 ment) that apply to rank awards for members of the Sen18 ior Executive Service under section 4507.’’.

19 (b) REGULATIONS.—Section 4506 of title 5, United

20 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the agency awards

21 program’’ and inserting ‘‘the awards programs’’.

22 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

23 for chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code, is amended
3

•HR 5406 IH

1 by inserting after the item relating to section 4507 the

2 following:

‘‘4507a. Awarding of ranks to other senior career employees.’’.

Æ
#### § 960.16 Comments by other parties.

Any party to a proceeding other than the applicant and Postal Service may file comments on an application within 30 days after it is served or on an answer within 15 days after it is served. A commenting party may not participate further in proceedings on the application unless the adjudicative officer determines that the public interest requires such participation in order to permit full exploration of matters raised in the comments.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on DoD Frequency Spectrum Issues will meet in closed session on June 27-28, 2000, at SAIC, 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22203.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting, the Task Force will examine the competing interest in and access to the RF frequency spectrum and its impact on military readiness and national security in the 21st century. This study will review and evaluate DOD user frequency spectrum requirements and related advances in technology to improve utilization of this finite resource.

In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App II (1994)), it has been determined that this Defense Science Board Task Force meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: June 9, 2000.

L. M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-15079  Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### § 102-40.95 Who pays for the costs incident to the transfer of personal property with special handling requirements?

You may charge the Federal agency or the SASP any costs you incur in packing, preparing for shipment, and transporting property with special handling requirements (see parts 102-36 and 102-37 of this subchapter).
March 14 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ANNETTE GRUBICH , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00138

- CV V.

DOW CORNING CORPORAT ION , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to di smiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on January 29, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, An nette Grubich. We further order that mandate be issued immediately. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-51238 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DESIDERIO RIVERA-URBINA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-01-CR-512-ALL

-------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Desiderio Rivera-Urbina appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is invalid because it exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Rivera-Urbina complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on his prior deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision violates the Due ProcessNo. 01-51238 -2- Clause. Alternatively, Rivera-Urbina contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Rivera-Urbina acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5562

AN ACT

To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow a judge

to whom a case is transferred to retain jurisdiction over

certain multidistrict litigation cases for trial.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5562 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multidistrict Litigation

3 Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION.

5 Section 1407 of title 28, United States Code, is

6 amended—

7 (1) in the third sentence of subsection (a), by

8 inserting ‘‘or ordered transferred to the transferee

9 or other district under subsection (i)’’ after ‘‘termi10 nated’’; and

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 section:

13 ‘‘(i)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), any action trans14 ferred under this section by the panel may be transferred

15 for trial purposes, by the judge or judges of the transferee

16 district to whom the action was assigned, to the transferee

17 or other district in the interest of justice and for the con18 venience of the parties and witnesses.

19 ‘‘(2) Any action transferred for trial purposes under

20 paragraph (1) shall be remanded by the panel for the de21 termination of compensatory damages to the district court

22 from which it was transferred, unless the court to which

23 the action has been transferred for trial purposes also

24 finds, for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and

25 in the interests of justice, that the action should be re26 tained for the determination of compensatory damages.’’.
3

•HR 5562 EH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

3 any civil action pending on or brought on or after the date

4 of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives December 15,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5562

AN ACT

To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow a

judge to whom a case is transferred to retain jurisdiction over certain multidistrict litigationcases for trial.
#### § 102-74.200 What information are Federal agencies required to report to the Department of Energy (DOE)?

Federal agencies, upon approval of GSA, must report to the DOE the energy consumption in buildings, facilities, vehicles, and equipment within 45 calendar days after the end of each quarter as specified in the DOE Federal Energy Usage Report DOE F 6200.2 Instructions.
§ 501.9 Demonstration or test Postage Evidencing Systems. ( a ) A demonstration or test postage evidencing system is any system that produces an image that replicates a postage indicium for which the Postal Service has not received payment for postage. The following procedures must be followed to implement controls over demonstration or test Postage Evidencing Systems: ( 1 ) A demonstration or test Postage Evidencing System may print only specimen or test indicia. A specimen or test indicia must clearly indicate that the indicia does not represent valid postage.
( 2 ) A demonstration or test Postage Evidencing System must be recorded as such on internal provider inventory records and must be tracked by model number, serial number, and physical location.
( 3 ) A demonstration or test Postage Evidencing System must remain under the provider's direct control. A demonstration or test Postage Evidencing System may not be left in the possession of a customer under any circumstance.
( b ) All indicia printed by a demonstration or test Postage Evidencing System must be collected and destroyed daily.
§ 775.2 Policy. It is the policy of the Postal Service to: ( a ) Interpret and administer applicable policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States in accordance with the policies set forth in the National Environmental Policy Act, as amended, and the NEPA Regulations.
( b ) Make the NEPA process useful to Postal Service decision makers and the public.
( c ) Emphasize environmental issues and alternatives in the consideration of proposed actions.
( d ) Encourage and facilitate public involvement in decisions which affect the quality of the human environment.
( e ) Use the NEPA process to identify and assess reasonable alternatives to proposed actions in order to avoid or minimize adverse effects on the environment.
( f ) Use all practicable means to protect, restore, and enhance the quality of the human environment.
( g ) Reduce paperwork.
( h ) Reduce delay.