alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP98-54-000]

                    On May 23, 2000, an informal settlement conference was held in the above-docketed filing respecting the Kansas                     *ad valorem*                     issues. At that conference, the participants agreed to hold a second informal settlement conference on June 29, 2000. The conference will begin at 10:30 and the location will be at the offices of the Attorney General, 1525 Sherman Street, Denver, Colorado 80203. The specific meeting room will be posted at the Attorney General's offices.                

                    All interested parties in the above dockets are requested to attend the informal settlement conference. If a party has any questions respecting the conference, please call Richard Miles, the Director of the Dispute Resolution Service. His telephone number is 1 877 FERC ADR (337-2237) or 202-208-0702 and his e-mail address is                     *richard.miles@ferc.fed.us.*

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-15272 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 102-37.175 How does a SASP find out what property is potentially available for donation? ( a ) A SASP may conduct onsite screening at various Federal facilities, contact or submit want lists to GSA, or use GSA's or other agencies' computerized inventory system to electronically search for property that is potentially available for donation (see § 102-36.90 for information on GSAXcess).
( b ) For the SASP (or a SASP's representative) to perform onsite screening, the screener must coordinate the onsite visit and screening with the individual holding agency or organization. The screener should ascertain the identification required and any special procedures for access to the facility or location.
[67 FR 2584, Jan. 18, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 64514, Oct. 30, 2014]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Michele D. Johnson, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having considered 

the Motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

The Motion is GRANTED. Michele D. Johnson may appear and participate in this action 

on behalf of Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification 

of all electronic filings to Michele D. Johnson, at michele.johnson@lw.com.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at , Florida, this 

day of .

 

 United States District Judge

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 40-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15597]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Gas Utilization Research Forum (``GURF'')

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 4, 2000, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Gas Utilization Research 
Forum (``GURF'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the 
purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, SBM Offshore Systems, Monaco, Cedex, FRANCE has been 
added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Gas Utilization Research Forum 
(``GURF'') intends to file additional written notification disclosing 
all changes in membership.
    On December 19, 1990, Gas Utilization Research Forum (``GURF'') 
filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. 
The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on January 16, 1991 (56 FR 1655).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 16, 
1999. A notice has not yet been published in the Federal Register.

Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 00-15597 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1538]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 99N-2549]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Cosmetic Product Voluntary Reporting Program

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Cosmetic Product Voluntary 
Reporting Program'' has been approved by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Peggy Schlosburg, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  In the Federal Register of October 28, 1999 
(64 FR 58069), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0030. 
The approval expires on December 31, 2002. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: January 14, 2000.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.
[FR Doc. 00-1538 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements of Endocare, Inc. pertaining to the 1995 Stock Plan and 1995Director Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-30405 and No. 333-79785), 1995 StockPlan (Form S-8 No. 333-52486), Special Option Grant to Mr. John CracchioloPursuant to a Written Compensation Agreement (Form S-8 No. 333-81846), and the2001 Long Term Incentive and Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-84926), of ourreport dated March 10, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Endocare, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.                    /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP         
Los Angeles, California
#### § 101-26.700 Scope and applicability of subpart.

This subpart prescribes policy and procedures relating to procurement sources other than those of GSA and the Department of Defense. The provisions of this subpart 101-26.7 are applicable to executive agencies unless otherwise indicated. Other Federal agencies are encouraged to obtain their requirements in the same manner.

[39 FR 20599, June 12, 1974]
#### § 102-33.320 What must we do if we are unable to perform required mutilation of aircraft parts?

If you are unable to perform the required mutilation of aircraft parts, you must turn the parts in to a Federal or Federally-approved facility for mutilation and proper disposition. Ensure that any contractor follows the provisions of § 102-33.315 for mutilating and disposing of the parts.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, 

v.

DAVID LOPEZ GONZALES, Petitioner. 

No. 1 CA-CR 20-0347 PRPC 

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2012-124110-001 

The Honorable Stephen M. Hopkins, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Amanda M. Parker 

Counsel for Respondent

David Lopez Gonzales, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge David B. Gass, Judge Michael J. Brown and Judge David 

D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 2-11-2021
STATE v. GONZALES

Decision of the Court

2 

PER CURIAM: 

¶1 Petitioner David Lopez Gonzales seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s fourth 

petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
§ 101-39.003 Financing. ( a ) Section 211(d) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act, 1949, as amended, provides that the General Supply Fund, provided for in section 109 of the Act, shall be available for use by or under the direction and control of the Administrator of General Services for paying all elements of cost incident to the establishment, maintenance, and operation of fleet management systems.
( b ) When an agency other than GSA operates an interagency fleet management system, the financing and accounting methods shall be developed by GSA in cooperation with the agency concerned.
[51 FR 11023, Apr. 1, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 59887, Nov. 26, 1991]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTREACTED FROM THE SUNBEAM
COPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              25,908
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      342,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                        42,339
<INVENTORY>                                        518,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   910,152
<PP&E>                                             657,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                     217,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,078,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,026,329
<BONDS>                                            838,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,074
<OTHER-SE>                                       (149,539)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,078,469
<SALES>                                          1,148,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,148,696
<CGS>                                              863,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,169,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     7,940
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (131,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (139,608)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (139,608)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (139,608)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (1.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.30)


</TABLE>
§ 101-25.206 Independent purchases by executive agencies. Items or groups of items of articles or services may be purchased independently by executive agencies, in accordance with regulations of GSA otherwise applicable, when: ( a ) Not otherwise prescribed in current regulations, or included in mandatory Federal Supply Schedules, issued by GSA or by another executive agency designated by the Administrator of General Services.
( b ) For emergency requirements when time does not permit purchasing through the authorized central purchasing agency. A record shall be maintained of such transactions and be made available to the responsible central purchasing agency upon request.
( c ) By consultation between GSA and agencies concerned, it is determined that interagency purchase assignment would adversely affect the national security or military operations.
( d ) The purchases cannot be publicly disclosed in the interest of national security.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 14, 1999, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                    (“the Act”), CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. (the “Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, BT Squared Technologies, Inc. has changed its name to 2order.com, Atlanta, GA. Also, Aventura Systems ASA, Oslo, Norway has been dropped as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On June 13, 1994, CommerceNet Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 31, 1994 (59 FR 45012).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 23, 1999. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on December 2, 1999 (64 FR 67588).                

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 00-15605  Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.A.B., IV, a Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00388

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 00044J

Trial cou rt: 314th District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing En Banc is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: November 24 , 2015

*En banc court consi sts of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland,

Massengale, Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.

Jennings, J., dissenting from denial of en banc reconsideration.
#### § 102-40.90 Must we establish additional requirements for the inspection of personal property with special handling requirements?

Yes, you are responsible for establishing appropriate safeguards and providing instructions for personal protection to screeners who are inspecting property with special handling requirements. Also, it is the responsibility of the state agency and/or donee to comply with DOT regulations (49 CFR parts 171 through 177) when transporting hazardous material. Any costs incident to repacking or recontainment will be borne by the state agency and/or donee. Also, state agencies and/or donees will comply with EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (40 CFR parts 261 through 265) including its application to transporters, storers, users, and permitting of hazardous wastes.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook for Business Machine Servicemen

              																	Labbie, Claire Lois					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment Outlook for Business Machine Servicemen : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 892*,												Washington: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1947,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4344,			accessed on September 8, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER