alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFORE THE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ )

Nondiscrimination on the Basis of ) Docket OST

- 2008

- 0273

Disability in Air Travel )

__________________________________________ )

MOTION OF KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD.

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

William H. Callaway, Jr.

David M. Endersbee

ZUCKERT, SCOUTT & RASENBERGER,

L.L.P.

888 17 th Street, N.W., Suite 700

Washington, DC 20006

Tel: (202) 973

- 7906

Fax: (202) 342

- 0683

Email: whcallaway@zsrlaw.com

dmendersbee@zsrlaw.com

Counsel for Korean Air L ines Co., Ltd.

April 28, 2015BEFORE THE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ )

Nondiscrimination on the Basis of ) Docket OST

- 2008

- 0273

Disability in Air Travel )

_________

_________________________________ )

MOTION OF KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD.

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Pursuant to Section 302.12 of the Department’s Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 302 .12)

,

Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. (“Korean Air”) respectfully moves for conf idential treatment of

certain information and materials submitted in connection with its April 28, 2015 application for

an equivalent a lternat ive d etermination (the “Application”)

.

Korean Air has prepared a confidential version of its Application whic h has been

submitted to the Department and which is marked as confidential.

Subsection (b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) exempts “trade secrets

and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential”

from public disclosure. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4). In its application, Korean Air has provided

, inter

alia

, confidential and proprietary information about advanced new seating and cabin dimen sions

(Exhibits KE

- 1 through KE

- 3 ).

Exhibits KE

- 1 through KE

- 3 , and the references thereto in the Application, co nstitute (1)

commercial or financial information; (2) obtained from a person outside the government; which

is (3) privileged or confidential. Release of this detailed data would cause Korean AirMotion of Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.

For Confidential Treatment

April 25, 2015

2 competitive harm. Korean Air would not otherwise release th is information to a third party, and

the premium seating information which is the subject of Korean Air’s Application is, at the time

of its Application, proprietary

.

WHEREFORE

, Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. respectfully requests th at the Department

treat as confidential the information and materials more fully described above.

Respectfully submitted,

______________________________

April 28, 2015 William H. Callaway, Jr.

David M. Endersbee

ZUCKERT, SCOUTT & RASENBERGER,

L.L.P.

888 17 th Street, N.W., Suite 700

Washington, DC 20006

Tel: (202) 973

- 7906

Fax: (202) 342

- 0683

Email: whcallaway@zsrlaw.com

dmendersbee@zsrlaw.com

Counsel for Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
#### § 102-78.60 When leasing space, are Federal agencies able to give preference to space in historic properties or districts?

Yes, Executive Order 13006 requires Federal agencies that have a mission requirement to locate in an urban area to give first consideration to space in historic buildings and districts inside central business areas. Agencies may give a price preference of up to 10 percent to space in historic buildings and districts, in accordance with §§ 102-73.120 and 102-73.125 of this chapter.
|   | (a) | The      annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 of      the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | Information      contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Heera Lee                                                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Heera      Lee,Director      of FinancePrincipal      Financial Officer |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 613 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 613

 To amend title 9, United States Code, to allow employees the right to 
   accept or reject the use of arbitration to resolve an employment 
                              controversy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 1999

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 9, United States Code, to allow employees the right to 
   accept or reject the use of arbitration to resolve an employment 
                              controversy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARBITRATION CHOICE.

    (a) Definition.--Section 1 of chapter 1 of title 9, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``nation, but nothing herein'' and all 
that follows through the end and inserting ``nation.''.
    (b) Arbitration Choice.--Chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 17. Resolution of controversy
    ``(a) Notwithstanding an employment contract that provides for the 
use of arbitration to resolve a controversy arising out of or relating 
to the employment relationship, arbitration may be used to settle such 
a dispute only if--
            ``(1) the employer or employee submits a written request 
        after the dispute arises to the other party to use arbitration; 
        and
            ``(2) the other party consents in writing not later than 60 
        days after the receipt of the request to use arbitration.
    ``(b) An employer subject to this Act may not require an employee 
to arbitrate a dispute as a condition of employment.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to contracts entered 
into, amended, altered, modified, renewed, or extended after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**IN THE SUPREME COUR T OF**  **THE ST AT**  **E OF MONT**  **ANA No.**  **DA 20**  **- 0**  **613**

**____________________________________________________________** JASON D. FRANKS, Petitioner and App ellant, v. ST ATE OF MONT

ANA, Respondent and Appellee . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Unopposed Motion to supplement the record , and good cause appearing; **IT IS HEREBY**

**ORDERED** that the motion is hereby granted, and the clerk shall obtain the following transcripts and file the m as part of the record in this case : 1.Jury trial - November 5 - 9, 2012 ( previously filed in DA 13 - 0385) 2.Sentencing hearing - January 2, 2013 ( previously filed in DA 13 - 0385 ) 3.Jury trial - February 8 - 11, 2016 ( previously filed in DA 16 - 0356 ) 10/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-06134. Sentencing hearing - April 7, 20 16 ( previously filed in DA 16 - 0356 ).

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 28 2021
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCalibration of sonic valves for the laminar flow control, leading-edge flight testSonic needle valves were calibrated to measure and control airflow in the suction system for the leading-edge flight test. The procedure and results for the calibration flow test of 4:41 flight valves are given. Mass-flow rates, which ranged from 0.001 to 0.012 lbm/sec, and maximum back pressure were measured for total temperatures from -30 F to 75 F and total pressures from 120 to 540 psf. Correlating equations are obtained for mass-flow rate as a function of total pressure, total temperature, and valve opening length. The most important aspect of flow measurement and control is found to be the measurement of valve opening length.Document ID19850015396Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsPetley, D. H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Alexander, W., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Wright, A. S., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Vallas, M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1985Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2423L-15893NASA-TP-2423Accession Number85N23707Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-45-63Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850015396.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
AMERICAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION 10-Q





EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of American Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.

|                    |                                                                           
|------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |                                                                           
|                    |                                                                           
|                    |                                                                           
|August 11, 2003     | BY: s/Carl H. Lindner                                                     
|Date                | Carl H. Lindner                                                           
|                    | Chairman of the Board and                                                 
|                    | Chief Executive Officer                                                   
|                    |                                                                           
|                    |                                                                           
|                    |                                                                           
|                    |                                                                           
|August 11, 2003Date | BY: s/Fred J. Runk    Fred J. Runk
    Senior Vice President and Treasurer







|A signed original of this written statement will be retained by the Registrant and
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    





E-4
§ 102-34.280 What State inspections must we have for Government motor vehicles? You must have the following State inspections for Government motor vehicles: ( a ) Federally-mandated emissions inspections when required by the relevant State motor vehicle administration or State environmental department. Your agency must pay for these inspections if the fee is not waived. GSA Fleet will pay the cost of these inspections for motor vehicles leased from GSA Fleet; or
( b ) For motor vehicles that display license plates issued by a State, Commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, motor vehicle safety inspections required by the relevant motor vehicle administration. Your agency must pay for these inspections unless the fee is waived. Payment for these inspections for motor vehicles leased from GSA Fleet is the responsibility of the using agency. Government motor vehicles that display official U.S. Government license plates do not require motor vehicle safety inspections.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00838-CV

In re Jeffrey (Tre) Krueger

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

THE STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF TRAVIS

TO: THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Having considered the petition for writ of habeas corpus and record filed with this

Court, this Court concludes that Relator is illegally restrained pursuant to an order holding Relator

in contempt and committing him to county jail, which was rendered by the 201st District Court of

Travis County, Texas, on December 19, 2012, in cause number D-1-GN-11-001680, on the docket

of said court. IT IS THEREFORE ordered that Relator, Jeffrey (Tre) Krueger, be and hereby is

released from the effects of the order holding Relator in contempt and committing him to county jail,

and is further released from the bond set by this Court on December 31, 2012, in accordance with

the attached opinion of this Court.

ISSUED under my hand and seal May 16, 2013.

___________________________________________

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk
August 31, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 31st day of August, 2016.

10-15-00111-CR	JUAN FRANCISCO SEGOVIA v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 54TH DISTRICT COURT OF McLENNAN COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 2013-1209-C2 – AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

	“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record of the Court below, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by the Court that the judgment be in all things affirmed and that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
|    |                                                                                                                                                          |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 of Impax Laboratories, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |  |
| April 13, 2018 | By: | /s/ Bryan M. Reasons |
|           |   | Bryan M. Reasons |
|           |   | Senior Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-81489-CIV-SINGHAL/McCabe

JAMES FISHER, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner

of Social Security,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER has come before the Court upon a Report and Recommendation 

(DE [32]) recommending that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

(DE [31]) and affirm the decision of the Administrative Law Judge. The Court has 

reviewed the entire file and record and has made a de novo review of the issues. 

No objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation having been 

filed, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (DE [32]) is

AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.

2. The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE [31]) is GRANTED.

3. The Administrative Law Judge’s Decision is AFFIRMED.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Any other pending

motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 29th day 

of June 2023.

Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF

Case 9:22-cv-81489-AHS Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/29/2023 Page 1 of 1
Order filed, June 6, 2018.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-18-00300-CR, 01-18-00301-CR, 01-18-00302-CR and 01-18-00303-CR

TROY LEVI BURWELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 1557904, 1557905, 1557906 and 1557907

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due 06/04/2018. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we 

issue the following order.

We order, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal, 

if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
250 E Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 | 800-942-2677 | TTY 800-833-3722

To: Deborah Jeffrey

Inspector General 

From: Lori Giblin/s/

Chief Risk Officer 

Subject: High-Dollar Overpayments for the quarter ending December 31, 2018

Date: February 4, 2019

The purpose of this document is to comply with the High-Dollar overpayments reporting 

requirements in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123, Appendix C. 

Appendix C requires agency heads to submit reports quarterly on High-Dollar 

overpayments to the Office of Inspector General.

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) identifies high-dollar 

overpayments through improper payments testing, which was completed in October 2018

(FY 19 Q1). CNCS has identified the AmeriCorps, RSVP, FGP, and SCP grant programs as 

susceptible to significant improper payments. The high-dollar overpayment threshold is 

based upon aggregate payments to an individual or entity during a quarter. CNCS 

projected all payments identified as improper to reflect the quarterly amount paid. For the 

reporting period covering 10/01/2018 through 12/31/2018, CNCS did not identify any 

high-dollar overpayments.

This report upholds the agency’s commitment to carrying out the Executive Order goal of 

eliminating payment errors. Reducing improper payments is a key priority for CNCS. We 

continue to monitor programs in order to reduce the amount of overpayments.