alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(b)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alberto-Culver Company (the company) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, William J. Cernugel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ William J. Cernugel  
|William J. Cernugel      
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer  

May 6, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Stephanie A. Casey, of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal, and requests that all papers served in this 

case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Dated: May 8, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Stephanie Casey

Stephanie A. Casey

Florida Bar No. 97483

Email: scasey@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal 

 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 189 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 1 of 1
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 603

AN ACT

To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify

dents.‘‘Death on the High Seas Act’’ to aviation incithe application of the Act popularly known as the
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 603

AN ACT

To amend title 49, United States Code, to clarify the application of the Act popularly known as the ‘‘Death on the

High Seas Act’’ to aviation incidents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 603 EH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION AMENDMENT.

2 Section 40120(a) of title 49, United States Code, is

3 amended by inserting ‘‘(including the Act entitled ‘An Act

4 relating to the maintenance of actions for death on the

5 high seas and other navigable waters’, approved March 30,

6 1920, commonly known as the Death on the High Seas

7 Act (46 U.S.C. App. 761–767; 41 Stat. 537–538))’’ after

8 ‘‘United States’’.

9 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

10 The amendment made by section 1 applies to civil

11 actions commenced after the date of the enactment of this

12 Act and to civil actions that are not adjudicated by a court

13 of original jurisdiction or settled on or before such date

14 of enactment.

Passed the House of Representatives March 3,

1999.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Jeffrey A. Neiman, Esq., of Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro LLP, hereby enters his

appearance as counsel on behalf of Solomid Corporation in the above-captioned matter and 

respectfully requests that copies of all future pleadings, orders, and other papers be provided to the 

undersigned.

Date: June 6, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jeffrey A. Neiman

Jeffrey A. Neiman

Florida Bar No. 544469

MARCUS NEIMAN RASHBAUM & 

PINEIRO LLP 

100 SE 3rd Ave Ste 805

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394

Telephone: (954) 462-1200

jneiman@mnrlawfirm.com 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 219 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 6, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Appearance was served via CM/ECF on all counsel or parties of record on the Service List

By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Neiman

Jeffrey A. Neiman

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 219 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-73.60 With whom may Federal agencies enter into lease agreements?

Federal agencies, upon approval from GSA, may enter into lease agreements with any person, partnership, corporation, or other public or private entity, provided that such lease agreements do not bind the Government for periods in excess of twenty years (40 U.S.C. 585(a)). Federal agencies may not enter into lease agreements with persons who are barred from contracting with the Federal Government (e.g., Members of Congress or debarred or suspended contractors).
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41212 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. S EB AS T I AN L OP EZ
- AL F AR O , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 2: 04- C R
- 563- 1 B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederal P u bl i c D efen der ap p o in ted to r epresent S ebasti an L opezA l faro h a s m ov ed for l ea ve to w i th d ra w a n d h a s fi l ed a b ri ef i n acco rd a n ce w i th A n d er s v . C a lif

o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . L opez-A l faro ha s n otf i l ed a respon se. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l os e s no n on frivo l ou s is s u e for ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po ns i bi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
§ 334.270 York River adjacent to Cheatham Annex Depot, Naval Supply Center, Williamsburg, Va.; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The waters of York River bounded as follows: Beginning at a point on shore at Cheatham Annex Depot at latitude 37°17′14′′ N., longitude 76°35′38′′ W.; thence to a point offshore at latitude 37°17′52′′ N., longitude 76°35′20′′ W.; thence approximately parallel to the shore to a point at latitude 37°17′23′′ N., longitude 76°34′39′′ W.; thence to the shore at latitude 37°16′58′′ N., longitude 76°35′03′′ W.; and thence along the shore at Cheatham Annex Depot to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) No loitering will be permitted within the area. Oystermen may work their own leaseholds or public bottom within the area, provided they obtain special permission from the Officer in Charge, Cheatham Annex Depot, Naval Supply Center, Williamsburg, Virginia.
( 2 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Officer in Charge, Cheatham Annex Depot, U.S. Naval Supply Center, Williamsburg, Virginia.
[22 FR 4814, July 9, 1957. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

MARK ROSEMAN WPB F AUTOMOTIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC

WPB F AUTOMOTIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC

C/O its Registered Agent:

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY

300 S ORANGE AVE STE 1600 (JGH)

ORLANDO, FL 32801

JOSHUA FEYGIN, PLLC.

1930 HARRISON STREET 

SUITE 208 F

HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020

P: 954.228.5674

F: 954.697.0357

9:22-cv-81868-DMM

Dec 2, 2022 s/ N. Wilner

Case 9:22-cv-81868-DMM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-73.320 Who must comply with these provisions?

Each Federal lessee and covered entity must cooperate and comply with these provisions.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Morteza Ejabat, Chief Executive Officer of
Zhone Technologies, Inc. (the Company), and Kirk Misaka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to their knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 16, 2009



|                                       |  |  |  |                                    
|-------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|/s/ MORTEZA EJABAT                     |  |  |  | /s/ KIRK MISAKA                    
|Morteza Ejabat Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Kirk Misaka Chief Financial Officer
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

HOMESTEAD HOSPITAL, INC., BAPTIST HEALTH

SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., PARAGON CONTRACTING

SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a TEAMHEALTH FLORIDA, and

HEALTHCARE REVENUE RECOVERY GROUP, LLC, 

d/b/a HRRG, ARS ACCOUNT RESOLUTION SERVICES,

 Southern District of Florida

ADISLEN PAZ DEL SOL

 

 HOMESTEAD HOSPITAL, INC. 

 c/o CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY, as Registered Agent 

 1201 HAYS STREET 

 TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301

Monica Amor, Esq., Amor Law Firm, P.A.

3625 NW 82nd Avenue, Suite 203

Doral, Florida 33166

Tel: (305) 882-2667; Fax: (888) 311-2667

Email: mamor@amorlaw.com

Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 959.4 Demands for payment of postage. Final demands for payment of postage will be accompanied by a copy of these rules and will: ( a ) State that the demand is final unless appealed under these rules within 15 days after receipt of the demand;
( b ) Describe the transaction on which the demand is based and the provisions of law or regulation alleged to have been violated; and
( c ) State the manner in which the amount of the demand is computed.
I

★

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5312

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to protect children from drug

traffickers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 2000

Mr. MCCOLLUM (for himself, Mr. ROGAN, Mr. MICA, Mr. NETHERCUTT, and

Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to protect children

from drug traffickers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Our Chil5 dren From Drugs Act of 2000’’.
2

HR 5312 IH1S

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR

2 USING MINORS TO DISTRIBUTE DRUGS.

3 Section 420 of the Controlled Substances Act (21

4 U.S.C. 861) is amended—

5 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘one year’’

6 and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and

7 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘one year’’

8 and inserting ‘‘5 years’’.

9 SEC. 3. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR

10 DISTRIBUTING DRUGS TO MINORS.

11 Section 418 of the Controlled Substances Act (21

12 U.S.C. 859) is amended—

13 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘one year’’

14 and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and

15 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘one year’’

16 and inserting ‘‘5 years’’.

17 SEC. 4. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR

18 DRUG TRAFFICKING IN OR NEAR A SCHOOL

19 OR OTHER PROTECTED LOCATION.

20 Section 419 of the Controlled Substances Act (21

21 U.S.C. 860) is amended—

22 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘one year’’

23 and inserting ‘‘3 years’’; and
3

HR 5312 IH1S

1 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘three years’’

2 each place that term appears and inserting ‘‘5

3 years’’.

Æ
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Aguilar-Ortiz’s

request for oral argument is denied.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL AGUILAR-ORTIZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73206

Agency No. A078-433-365

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 11, 2011** 

Before: THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Samuel Aguilar-Ortiz, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

AUG 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73206

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we

deny the petition for review 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that the threats and

shootings Aguilar-Ortiz suffered while serving in the military and civilian police

force were on account of his ongoing service and not on account of a protected

ground. See Cruz-Navarro v. INS, 232 F.3d 1024, 1029-30 (9th Cir. 2000)

(persecution occurring because a person is a current member of a police force or

the military is not on account of a protected ground). Substantial evidence also

supports the agency’s finding that Aguilar-Ortiz did not establish a well-founded

fear of future persecution based on his former military or police service because

Aguilar-Ortiz lived in El Salvador without incident for over 15 months after he

resigned from the police force. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.

2000). Accordingly, his asylum claim fails.

Because Aguilar-Ortiz failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he

necessarily cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal.

See Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Aguilar-Ortiz failed to establish it is more likely than not he will be
3 08-73206

tortured upon return to El Salvador. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1067-

68 (9th Cir. 2009). The record does not support Aguilar-Ortiz’s contention that the

BIA provided an incomplete analysis of his CAT claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               ---------------------------------------------------


We  consent  to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8  (SEC  File  No.  333-74632), filed on December 6, 2001 and the Registration
Statement  on  Form S-8, (SEC File No. 333-89682), filed on June 3, 2002, of our
independent  auditor's  report  dated February 19, 2003, relating to the balance
sheets  of Humatech, Inc. (an Illinois corporation) (SEC File No. 0-28557, CIK #
1102013)  as of April 30, 2002 and 2001 and the related statements of operations
and  comprehensive  loss, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
years  ended  April  30,  2002 and 2001, which report appears in the 2002 Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB/A  of  Humatech,  Inc.


                                                 /s/  S.W. Hatfield, CPA

                                                 S. W. HATFIELD, CPA

Dallas, Texas
February 19, 2003


<PAGE>
**Exhibit 24.1****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A.Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full powerof substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical PartnersInternational, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesas he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of saidattorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.
Editorial Note on Part 3005
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3005, formerly part 3003, appear at 70 FR 48277, Aug. 17, 2005.

§ 3005.105 Appeals of denials of access or amendment. ( a ) If a request for access to or amendment of a record is denied, the requester may file a written appeal with the Chairman of the Commission. The Chairman will decide each appeal within 30 days of receipt unless the Chairman has, for good cause, extended the period for another 30 days.
( b ) If an appeal is denied, the requester will be notified of the decision, the reasons for the denial, the right to file a concise statement of disagreement, the procedures for filing a statement of disagreement, the subsequent uses of a statement of disagreement, and of the right to seek judicial review in accordance with subsection (g) of the Privacy Act.
[64 FR 57982, Oct. 28, 1999. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Fantastic Financial Corporation
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                             /S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-cr-06241-WJZ Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2000 P
#### § 778.5 What is the Postal Service's obligation with respect to federal interagency coordination?

The Postal Service, to the extent practicable, consults with and seeks advice from other federal departments and agencies substantially affected by Postal Service facility project actions covered under these regulations.