alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Summary of Cost Estimates for Arizona Regional Haze Phase 3 FIP (Do cket No. EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2013

- 0588)

BART Sources:

Source Project 

### Annual Cost Emission Reduction

ASARCO Second Acid Plant 

### $17,710,483 20,341 tons SO2

FMMI Secondary Capture System 

### $6,775,052 2,379

– 6,845 tons SO2

Sundt

Unit 4 SNCR $1,265,768 393 tons NOx

Dry Sorbent Injection $ 2,788,884 1,502 tons SO2

Nelson

Kiln 1 SNCR $ 400,936 

### 491 tons NOx

Low sulfur fuel $ 313,096 

### 366 tons SO2

Nelson

Kiln 2 SNCR $ 397,458 

### 493 tons NOx

Low sulfur fuel $ 458,179 

### 559 tons SO2

Total BART Cost = $30,109,856

RP Sources

Source Project 

### Annual Cost Emission Reduction

Phoenix SNCR $940,000 810 tpy NOx

CalPort SNCR $1,1 00,000 1,041 tons NOx

Total RP Cost = $2,040,000
Exhibit 32





Certification of Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
undersigned, Roger S. Marcus, Chief Executive Officer, and Howard N. Feist III, Chief Financial Officer, of American Biltrite Inc.
(the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2011 of the Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:   August 15, 2011 |                        
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|                        | /s/ Roger S. Marcus    
|                        | Roger S. Marcus        
|                        | Chief Executive Officer
|                        |                        
|                        |                        
|                        |                        
|                        | /s/ Howard N. Feist III
|                        | Howard N. Feist III    
|                        | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 35.2

HOV/TransCentra, Inc.

Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Item 1123

Pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, a review of the TransCentras activities during the year ended December 31, 2016 (the
Reporting Period) and of its performance under the servicing agreement between TransCentra andAmerican Express(the Servicing Agreement) has been made under the undersigned officers
supervision. To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, TransCentra has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|                                 |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Thomas Dolan                
|Thomas Dolan                    
|VP Information Security and Risk

February 1, 2017

www.transcentra.com

tel: 678-728-2500 fax: 678-728-2501

4855 Peachtree Industrial Boulevard, Suite 245, Norcross, Georgia 30092
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    405,877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               476,216
<PP&E>                                         634,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 400,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 799,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          428,105
<BONDS>                                        176,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     33,369
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   799,635
<SALES>                                        150,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,018
<CGS>                                         (28,529)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (28,529)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,734
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            119,734
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
§ 102-74.395 What is the policy concerning gambling? ( a ) Except for the vending or exchange of chances by licensed blind operators of vending facilities for any lottery set forth in a State law and authorized by section 2(a)(5) of the Randolph-Sheppard Act (20 U.S.C. 107 *et seq.*), all persons entering in or on Federal property are prohibited from— ( 1 ) Participating in games for money or other personal property;
( 2 ) Operating gambling devices;
( 3 ) Conducting a lottery or pool; or
( 4 ) Selling or purchasing numbers tickets.
( b ) This provision is not intended to prohibit prize drawings for personal property at otherwise permitted functions on Federal property, provided that the game or drawing does not constitute gambling per se. Gambling per se means a game of chance where the participant risks something of value for the chance to gain or win a prize.
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.715 Compliance reviews. ( a ) GSA may conduct compliance reviews and use similar procedures to investigate and correct violations of the Act and this regulation. GSA may conduct the reviews even in the absence of a complaint against a recipient. The reviews may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a violation of the Act and this regulation has occurred.
( b ) If a compliance review indicates a violation of the Act or this regulation, GSA attempts to achieve voluntary compliance with the Act. If compliance cannot be achieved, GSA arranges for enforcement as described in § 101-8.720.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00533-CV

EX PARTE G.A.A. a/k/a J.A.A.

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-1821-CV-C

Honorable William D. Old III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order granting G.A.A.

a/k/a J.A.A.’s petition for expunction is REVERSED. We RENDER an order denying the petition 

for expunction. We ORDER that the Texas Department of Public Safety is awarded the costs it 

incurred related to this appeal. 

SIGNED September 8, 2021.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-307-000]

Take notice that on May 31, 2000, U-T Offshore System, L.L.C. (U-TOS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective September 28, 1999:

First Revised Sheet No. 56

First Revised Sheet No. 57

First Revised Sheet No. 60

First Revised Sheet No. 61

Original Sheet No. 61A

First Revised Sheet No. 95

First Revised Sheet No. 96

First Revised Sheet No. 97

U-TOS states that the instant filing incorporates and properly paginates in UTOS' current tariff changes that were pending at the time UTOS' conversion tariff filing was being approved.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​      ( print page 36688)    rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14568  Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.2
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                 SUNBEAM ANNOUNCES ADDITIONAL MANAGEMENT CHANGES

         Fort Lauderdale, FL, (August 8, 1996) -- Sunbeam Corporation (NYSE:SOC)
announced today, in connection with the continuing rapid reorganization of the
Company's management, that Richard L. Boynton, President of the Company's
Household Products Group, and Paul M. O'Hara, Chief Financial Officer of
Sunbeam, are no longer with the Company. In addition, Michael R. Beauregard,
Vice President of Strategic Planning in the North American Group Office, also is
no longer with the Company.

         Russell A. Kersh, named on July 22 as Executive Vice President, Finance
and Administration, will take on additional duties as the Company's Chief
Financial Officer. Spencer Volk, head of International operations for Sunbeam,
will serve as temporary head of the Household Products Group, which is in the
process of reorganization under P. Newton White, Sunbeam's recently named
Executive Vice President of Consumer Products Worldwide.

         Albert J. Dunlap, Sunbeam's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
stated, "We are moving as quickly as possible to build a highly focused
management team to turn around a business which has substantially
under-performed over the past 18 months."

         Sunbeam Corporation is a leading consumer products company that
designs, manufactures and markets, nationally and internationally, a diverse
portfolio of outdoor and household brand name products. The Company's Sunbeam(R)
and Oster(R) brands have been household names for generations, both domestically
and abroad, and the Company is a market leader in many of its product
categories.
                                      # # #


Contact:          John DeSimone                         Pete Judice
                  Manager, Investor Relations           Burson-Marsteller
                  SUNBEAM CORPORATION                   New York
                  (954) 767-2100                        (212) 614-4506
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15656]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 15, 2000.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before July 21, 2000, 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1480.
    Regulation Project Number: FI-34-94 Final.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Hedging Transactions by Members of a Consolidated Group.
    Description: The information is required by the IRS to aid it in 
administering the law and to prevent manipulation. The information will 
be used to verify that a taxpayer is properly reporting its business 
hedging transactions.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 17,100.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper: 4 hours, 27 
minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other (one time).
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 76,050 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, Internal Revenue Service, Room 
5244, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224,
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Mary A. Able,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15656 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
§ 101-39.306 Operator's packet. The GSA Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS) will provide each system vehicle with an operator's packet containing the following information and instructions. This information should remain in the vehicle at all times, except when inconsistent with authorized undercover operations. ( a ) Driver's responsibilities;
( b ) Requirement of use for official purposes only;
( c ) Instruction for: ( 1 ) Acquiring maintenance and repair authorizations;
( 2 ) Acquiring emergency supplies, services, and repairs; and
( 3 ) Reporting accidents.
( d ) The telephone numbers of responsible GSA IFMS fleet management center employees to be called in case of accident or emergency;
( e ) Instructions on the use of the Standard Form 149, U.S. Government National Credit Card;
( f ) List of contractors from which vehicle operators may purchase items authorized by the SF 149, U.S. Government National Credit Card;
( g ) Accident reporting kit which contains: ( 1 ) Standard Form 91, Motor Vehicle Accident Report; and
( 2 ) Standard Form 94, Statement of Witness.
Note:
The vehicle operator or assignee shall be personally responsible for safeguarding and protecting the SF 149, U.S. Government National Credit Card.
[51 FR 11023, Apr. 1, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 59891, Nov. 26, 1991; 58 FR 65291, Dec. 14, 1993]
#### § 101-17.0 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR chapter 102, parts 102-1 through 102-220).

For information on assignment and utilization of space, see FMR part 102-79 (41 CFR part 102-79).
#### § 102-37.515 Do SEAs have a priority over other SASP donees for DOD property?

Yes, SEAs have a priority over other SASP donees for DOD property, but only if DOD requests GSA to allocate surplus DOD property through a SASP for donation to a specific SEA. In such cases, DOD would be expected to clearly identify the items in question and briefly justify the request.
#### § 955.32 Dismissal for failure to prosecute.

Whenever a record discloses the failure of either party to file documents required by these rules, respond to notices or correspondence from the Board, comply with orders of the Board, or otherwise indicates an intention not to continue the prosecution or defense of an appeal, the Board may issue an order requiring the offending party to show cause why the appeal should not be either dismissed or granted, as appropriate. If the offending party shall fail to show such cause, the Board may take such action as it deems reasonable and proper under the circumstances.
Case 9:22-cv-81923-AMC Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/15/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-76.25 What standards must Federal agencies meet in providing architectural and interior design services? Federal agencies must design distinctive and high quality Federal facilities that meet all of the following standards: ( a ) Reflect the local architecture in buildings through the use of building form, materials, colors, or detail. Express a quality of permanence in the building interior similar to the building exterior.
( b ) Provide individuals with disabilities ready access to, and use of, the facilities in accordance with the standards in § 102-76.65.
( c ) Use metric specifications in construction where the metric system is the accepted industry standard, and to the extent that such usage is economically feasible and practical.
( d ) Provide for the design of security systems to protect Federal workers and visitors and to safeguard facilities against criminal activity and/or terrorist activity. Security design must support the continuity of Government operations during civil disturbances, natural disasters and other emergency situations.
( e ) Design and construct facilities that meet or exceed the energy performance standards applicable to Federal buildings in 10 CFR part 435.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.8

                             [BANK1ONE LETTERHEAD]


Thomas A. Gamm
First Vice President &
Managing Director




May 30, 2000

Mr. Norm Johnson
Controller
Childtime Childcare, Inc.
38345 West 10 Mile Road
Suite 100
Farmington Hills, MI  48335

Dear Norm:

This Letter Agreement dated May 30, 2000 serves to amend the Total Liabilities
to Tangible Net Worth negative covenant pursuant to section 5.2 (b) of the
February 1, 1996 Credit Agreement among Childtime Childcare, Inc. and Bank One
(f/k/a NBD Bank). Specifically, the Total Liabilities to Tangible Net Worth
covenant is amended from not less than 1.00:1.00 to not less than 1.15:1.00,
commencing on March 31, 2000.

If you should have any questions, please feel free to call.

Sincerely,


/s/ Thomas A. Gamm
-----------------------------------
Thomas A. Gamm
Managing Director

/s/ Glenn A. Currin
-----------------------------------
Glenn A. Currin
First Vice President/Credit Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

January 18, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00252

- CV

Jean Eckfo rd HARDAWAY , Et al.

,

Appellant s

v.

Lou Eda Korth Stubbs NIXON , Et al.,

Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 09

- 0188

- CVK Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on November 21, 2016

. Ms. Stella Grace Marks represents appellant on appeal. This court has granted Ms. Marks two extensions of time in which to file the brief, the latest until January 3, 2017. Neither the brief nor a third motion for

ex tension of time ha s been filed.

We, therefore, ORDER Ms. Marks to f ile, on or before January 30, 2017 , appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 38.8(a)(1). If Ms. Marks fails to file a ppellant’s brief and the written response on or before January 30, 2017 , we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. ; see also
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b),(c).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of January, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 139 (Monday, July 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 42304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17054]

[[Page 42304]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Quadrennial Energy Review: Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis, Secretariat, 
Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy published in the Federal Register on 
July 1, 2014, a notice of a public meeting to discuss and receive 
comments on issues related to the Quadrennial Energy Review. The notice 
is being corrected to change the time of the meeting.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of July 1, 2014, in FR DOC. 2014-15388, on 
page 37302, please make the following correction:
    In the DATES heading, first column, third line, remove 9:00 a.m. 
and in its place add 10:00 a.m.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 15 2014.
Michele Torrusio,
QER Secretariat, QER Interagency Task Force, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2014-17054 Filed 7-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUG 24, 2011

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-10318 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 9:10-cr-80097-WJZ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONOVAN WILLIS, 

a.k.a. Keith Harris-Conrad, 

a.k.a. Donovan Michael Willis,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(August 24, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur L. Wallace III, appointed counsel for Donovan Willis, has filed a
motion to withdraw supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record

reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,

and Willis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit B

Case 1:22-cv-23983-KMM Document 20-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-23983-KMM Document 20-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 101-4.540 Advertising.

A recipient shall not in any advertising related to employment indicate preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job in question.