Facility _Information facility _id utility

_code legal_owner_nam e

legl_operator_name

legal_address_ty pe

legal_address

legal_city legal_state legal_zip 6101 8069 14354 PacifiCorp PacifiCorp legal owner 1407 W . North Temple Salt Lake City

UT 84116

Page 1Facility _Information plant_nam e

physical_address

phyical_city

physical_state

physical_zip

ma iling_address

ma iling_city

ma iling_state

ma iling_zip Huntington Plant

Hwy 31, 10 miles W of Huntington Huntington UT 84528 P. O. Box 680 Huntington UT 84528

Page 2Facility _Information RFA_small_entity

ff_fired_coal

ff_fired_oil ff_fired_ngas ff_fired_petcoke

ff_fired_other

ff_permitted_coal

ff_permitted_oil

ff_permitted_ngas FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE No TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE

Page 3Facility _Information ff_permitted_petcoke

ff_permitted_other

deviation_reporting

continuous_emissions

cem_provided

facility _note FALSE FALSE Title V Air Operating Permit Deviation Reporting No Wyom ing DEQ, Air Quality Division FALSE FALSE Yes Utah Division of Air Quality There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 4Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 5Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 6Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 7Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 8Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 9Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 10Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 11Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 12Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 13Facility _Information
There have been no additional criteria pollutant/HAP combustion additives since the 2006 baghouse upgrade to Unit 2. Prior to the Unit 2 upgrade in 2006, SO3 flue gas conditioning had been employed since August 1991.Regarding coal analyses, all analyses, except trace elements, were run at SGS Huntington Lab.All trace element analyses were run at SGS Denver Lab, 4665 Paris Street Suite B-200, Denver, CO 80239Regarding Coal/Fuel Data for time periods during which Mercury emission testing was conducted, Huntington Plant has no trace element analysis data that correspond to the specific dates of the various emission test dates.Mercury CEMS data have been tabulated in the available spreadsheets. U1 data are available from Aug 8, 2008 thru Dec 31, 2009. U2 data are available from Feb 27, 2009 thru Dec 31, 2009.For Sulfur Dioxide permit limit Huntington unit 1 has an 80 percent removal limit on a 30 day rolling average. The removal requirement ty pically results in a maximum emission rate of 0.

Page 14facility _contacts facility _id contact_id contact_title contact_name

contact_phone1

contact_phone2

contact_email

contact_primary 8069 3 Environm ental Engineer Richard Neilson

4356874334 richard.neilson@pacificorp.com TRUE 8069 4 Environm ental Analyst Frank Zampedri

8012202169 frank.zampedri@pacificorp.com FALSE

Page 15facility _coal_utilized facility _id coal_ty pe percentage_mass percentage_btu

sy nfuel_ty pe

coal_note 8069 bitum inous 100 100

Page 16facility _oil_utilized facility _id oil_ty pe percentage_volume percentage_btu

other_ty pe 8069 No.2 Fuel Oil (distillate) 100 100

Page 17facility _other_materials facility _id other_material

permitted_burn

actually _burn other_quantity

other_quantity

_units other_note rcra_utilize rcra_explain

Page 18facility _other_materials rcra_explain

Page 19boiler_information

facility _id boiler_id boiler_ty pe boiler_other bottom_design

design_fuel heat_input ma x_heat_input MW e_capacity 8069 1 Tangential firing Dry Bottom coal 4537 4283.7 474 8069 2 Tangential firing Dry Bottom coal 4537 4451.7 479

Page 20boiler_information

MW e_net_capacity

design_gross_efficiency

operating_gross_efficiency

design_pressure

operating_pressure

design_temp

operating_temp

design_reheat_multiple

design_reheat_temp1 445 88.95 88.5 2520 2400 1005 990 FALSE 1005 450 88.95 88.5 2520 2400 1005 990 FALSE 1005

Page 21boiler_information

design_reheat_temp2

operating_reheat_multiple

operating_reheat_temp1

operating_reheat_temp2

hours_operated

vg_capacity

_factor applicable_NSPS

retirement_year

retirement_year_CBI FALSE 1005 8095 86.7 Subpart D FALSE FALSE 1005 8404 91.9 N FALSE

Page 22boiler_information

NOx_control

SO2_control

combustion_additives Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

Page 23boiler_fuels

facility _id boiler_id fuel_ty pe fuel_year percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_ty pe 8069 1 coal - bituminous 2007 99.9 8069 1 coal - bituminous 2008 99.9 8069 1 coal - bituminous 2009 99.9 8069 1 oil - distillate 2007 0.1 8069 1 oil - distillate 2008 0.1 8069 1 oil - distillate 2009 0.1 8069 2 coal - bituminous 2007 99.9 8069 2 coal - bituminous 2008 99.96 8069 2 coal - bituminous 2009 99.9 8069 2 oil - distillate 2007 0.1 8069 2 oil - distillate 2008 0.04 8069 2 oil - distillate 2009 0.1

Page 24boiler_control_NOx

facility _id boiler_id NOx_ty pe NOx_other NOx_online 8069 1 Low NOx Burner 4/1/1997 8069 1 Overfire Air 4/1/1997 8069 2 Low NOx Burner 12/1/2006 8069 2 Overfire Air 12/1/2006

Page 25boiler_control_SO2

facility _id boiler_id SO2_ty pe SO2_other SO2_online 8069 1 Low Sulfur Coal 6/1/1977 8069 2 Low Sulfur Coal 7/1/1974

Page 26boiler_additives

facility _id boiler_id boiler_additive additive_other

additive_online 8069 1 Flue gas conditioning to control opacity (e.g., SO3 injection, ammonia, other) 8/1/1991

Page 27facility _units facility _id unit_id 8069 1 8069 2

Page 28unit_boilers

facility _id unit_id boiler_id 8069 1 1 8069 2 2

Page 29facility _controls facility _id control_id control_group control_ty pe

control_other

legacy _control cntrol_online

control_offline

NOx_reagent 8069 BGH2 PM control Fabric Filter, pulse FALSE 12/1/2006 8069 ESP1 PM control Electrostatic precipitator, cold side, w/ flue gas conditioning FALSE 6/1/1977 8069 FGD1 SO2 control Spray ty pe FALSE 6/1/1977 8069 FGD2 SO2 control Spray ty pe FALSE 12/1/2006

Page 30facility _controls reagent_other

NOx_ammonia

SO2_sorbent

oher_sorbent

SO2_scrubber_additive Lim e No Lim e No

Page 31facility _sampling_ports facility _id sampling_port_id 8069 U1 Port 8069 U1a Port 8069 U1b Port 8069 U2 Port 8069 U2a Port 8069 U2b Port

Page 32facility _stacks facility _id stack_id stack_height stack_diameter

sack_gas_velocity 6101 STK1 8069 Stk1 8069 Stk2

Page 33configurations

facility _id configuration_id 8069 Htg 1 8069 Htg 2

Page 34configuration_components

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

order component_ty pe port_near 8069 Htg 1 1 1 Unit 8069 Htg 1 ESP1 3 PM control 8069 Htg 1 FGD1 4 SO2 control 8069 Htg 1 Stk1 5 Stack 8069 Htg 1 U1a Port 6 Sam pling Port pevious 8069 Htg 1 U1b Port 2 Sam pling Port pevious 8069 Htg 2 2 1 Unit 8069 Htg 2 BGH2 3 PM control 8069 Htg 2 FGD2 4 SO2 control 8069 Htg 2 Stk2 5 Stack 8069 Htg 2 U2a Port 6 Sam pling Port pevious 8069 Htg 2 U2b Port 2 Sam pling Port pevious

Page 35configuration_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

pollutant_nam e

permit_ty pe_1

em lim it_1 em lim it_units_1 avg_period_1

em lim it_2 em lim it_units_2 8069 Htg 1 PM (Filterable) Fderal - Title V Operating Permit

0.1 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

3 hours 8069 Htg 1 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.18 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 8069 Htg 2 PM (Filterable) Fderal - Title V Operating Permit

70 pound per hour (lb/hr)

6 hours 8069 Htg 2 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.26 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days 8069 Htg 2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.12 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

24 hours 8069 Htg 1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Federal - Title V Operating Permit

0.4 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

30 days

Page 36configuration_pollutants1

avg_period_2

em lim it_details

test_method

em rate em rate_units guarantee_level

_explain

req_monitoring

eq_recordkeeping Ref. Method 5B Annual Stack test and CAM plan PM Test results and Opacity records for CAM plan CEMS CEMS records are maintained in the DAHS Ref Method 5B 0.015 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu) No Annual Stack Test Stack Test results No CEMS CEMS records are maintained in the DAHS 0.08 pound per million British Thermal Unit (lb/MMBtu)

No CEMS CEMS records are maintained in the DAHS CEMS CEMS records are maintained in the DAHS

Page 37configuration_pollutants1

req_reporting Annual report of test results. Any CAM plan excursions would be reported to the state State and Federal quarterly reports and state deviation reports Annual submittal of stack test results. Stateand Federal quarterly and state deviation reports State and Federal quarterly and state deviation reports. State and Federal quarterly reports and state deviation reports

Page 38control_technologies

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id project_title project_ty pe vendor_name

vndor_contact

vendor_phone

Page 39control_technologies

vendor_address

vndor_city

vendor_state

vendor_zip actual_start_date projected_start_date

end_date sorbent chemical_additive

Page 40control_technologies

injection_point

HAP_em ission_reduction

HAP_em ission_rate

HAP_em ission_rate_units

HAP_achieved_reduction

HAP_achieved_rate

HAP_achieved_rate_units

feed_rate feed_rate_units

Page 41control_technologies feed_rate_units

Page 42control_coal_ranks

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id coal_ty pe

Page 43control_pollutants1

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id pollutant_nam e

Page 44control_costs

facility _id configuration_id

component_id

control_id boiler_retrofit boiler_new_install

total_capital_investm ent

total_operating_costs

base_year

Page 45control_costs

CBI

Page 46mi sc_controls

facility _id mi sc_control_id

control_description 8069 1 No

Page 47mi sc_control_configurations

facility _id mi sc_control_id

configuration_id 8069 1 Htg 1 8069 1 Htg 2

Page 48fuel_shipments

facility _id shipment_id

shipment_date

am ount_received

am ount_units

fuel_ty pe state_country other_country

county 8069 DC Apr 2009 4/1/2009 80535 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Aug 2009

8/1/2009 221832 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Dec 2009

12/1/2009 177755 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Feb 20092/1/2009 171481 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Jan 2009 1/1/2009 293310 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Jul 2009 7/1/2009 67332 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Jun 2009 6/1/2009 212682 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Mar 20093/1/2009 243679 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC May

2009 5/1/2009 175557 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Nov 2009

11/1/2009 233458 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Oct 2009

10/1/2009 150390 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DC Sep 2009

9/1/2009 137667 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Emery 8069 DG Apr 2009 4/1/2009 1369 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG Aug 2009

8/1/2009 64258 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG Dec 2009

12/1/2009 8874 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG Feb 2009

2/1/2009 2537 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG Jan 2009 1/1/2009 3924 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG Jul 2009 7/1/2009 50147 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG Jun 2009 6/1/2009 5069 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG May

2009 5/1/2009 5075 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG Nov 2009

11/1/2009 46711 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG Oct 2009

10/1/2009 36053 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 DG Sep 2009

9/1/2009 49630 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 WRFeb 2009

2/1/2009 289 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 WRJan 2009

1/1/2009 85 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 WRJul 2009 7/1/2009 8946 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 WRJun 2009

6/1/2009 3524 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon 8069 WRMar 2009

3/1/2009 1003 short tons (2000 lbs) coal UT UT - Carbon

Page 49fuel_shipments

coal_seam shipment_method Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor Blind Canyon

Conveyor UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks

Lower Sunnyside

Trucks Lower Sunnyside

Trucks UT - Carbon Trucks

Lower Sunnyside

Trucks Lower Sunnyside

Trucks

Page 50fuel_shipment_configurations

facility _id shipment_id

configuration_id 8069 DC Apr 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Apr 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC Aug 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Aug 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC Dec 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Dec 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC Feb 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Feb 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC Jan 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Jan 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC Jul 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Jul 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC Jun 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Jun 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC Mar 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Mar 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC May

2009 Htg 1 8069 DC May

2009 Htg 2 8069 DC Nov 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Nov 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC Oct 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Oct 2009

Htg 2 8069 DC Sep 2009

Htg 1 8069 DC Sep 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG Apr 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Apr 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG Aug 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Aug 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG Dec 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Dec 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG Feb 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Feb 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG Jan 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Jan 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG Jul 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Jul 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG Jun 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Jun 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG May

2009 Htg 1 8069 DG May

2009 Htg 2 8069 DG Nov 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Nov 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG Oct 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Oct 2009

Htg 2 8069 DG Sep 2009

Htg 1 8069 DG Sep 2009

Htg 2 8069 WRFeb 2009

Htg 1 8069 WRFeb 2009

Htg 2 8069 WRJan 2009

Htg 1 8069 WRJan 2009

Htg 2 8069 WRJul 2009

Htg 1 Page 51fuel_shipment_configurations

8069 WRJul 2009

Htg 2 8069 WRJun 2009

Htg 1 8069 WRJun 2009

Htg 2 8069 WRMar 2009

Htg 1 8069 WRMar 2009

Htg 2

Page 52fuel_shipment_samples

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id am ount_fuel am ount_fuel_units

total_sulfur ash_content heating_value

hating_units 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409 80535 tons 0.42 10.72 13165 Btu/lb 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809 221832 tons 0.53 7.4 13721 Btu/lb 8069 DC Dec 2009

HTGDC1209 177755 tons 0.53 10.5 13217 Btu/lb 8069 DC Feb 2009

HTGDC0209 171481 tons 0.51 9.99 13247 Btu/lb 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109 293310 tons 0.53 11.96 12952 Btu/lb 8069 DC Jul 2009

HTGDC0709 67332 tons 0.53 9.27 13398 Btu/lb 8069 DC Jun 2009

HTGDC0609 212682 tons 0.47 8.1 13609 Btu/lb 8069 DC Mar 2009

HTGDC0309 243679 tons 0.48 10.95 13127 Btu/lb 8069 DC May

2009 HTGDC0509 175557 tons 0.42 7.95 13597 Btu/lb 8069 DC Nov 2009

HTGDC1109 233458 tons 0.48 8.43 13582 Btu/lb 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009 150390 tons 0.49 10.07 13289 Btu/lb 8069 DC Sep 2009

HTGDC0909 137667 tons 0.6 11.95 12926 Btu/lb 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409 1369 tons 0.57 10.54 13220 Btu/lb 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809 64258 tons 0.57 10.7 13153 Btu/lb 8069 DG Dec 2009

HTGDG1209 8874 tons 0.71 16.77 12194 Btu/lb 8069 DG Feb 2009

HTGDG0209 2537 tons 0.58 8.92 13453 Btu/lb 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109 3924 tons 0.55 11.03 13112 Btu/lb 8069 DG Jul 2009

HTGDG0709 50147 tons 0.57 12.55 12838 Btu/lb 8069 DG Jun 2009

HTGDG0609 5069 tons 0.5 11.46 12734 Btu/lb 8069 DG May

2009 HTGDG0509 5075 tons 0.55 9.38 13428 Btu/lb 8069 DG Nov 2009

HTGDG1109 46711 tons 0.69 14.81 12504 Btu/lb 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009 36053 tons 0.68 13 12797 Btu/lb 8069 DG Sep 2009

HTGDG0909 49630 tons 0.56 10.33 13110 Btu/lb 8069 WRFeb 2009

HTGW R0209 289 tons 8069 WRJan 2009

HTGW R0109 85 tons 8069 WRJul 2009

HTGW R0709 8946 tons 1.13 9.85 13393 Btu/lb 8069 WRJun 2009

HTGW R0609 3524 tons 8069 WRMar 2009

HTGW R0309 1003 tons

Page 53fuel_shipment_samples

chlorine chlorine_units fluorine fluorine_units data_provided

data_other_specified

supplier_ty pe

supplier_name

supplier_address 500 parts per million (dry) (ppm) 100 parts per million (dry) (ppm)

contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple 340 parts per million (dry) (ppm) 60 parts per million (dry) (ppm)

contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple 470 parts per million (dry) (ppm) 120 parts per million (dry) (ppm)

standard operational procedures Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple 480 parts per million (dry) (ppm) 89 parts per million (dry) (ppm)

contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple 700 parts per million (dry) (ppm) 87 parts per million (dry) (ppm)

contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple 1000 parts per million (dry) (ppm) 100 parts per million (dry) (ppm)

contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple 640 parts per million (dry) (ppm) 92 parts per million (dry) (ppm)

contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple 340 parts per million (dry) (ppm) 60 parts per million (dry) (ppm)

contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple contractual obligations Other PacifiCorp 1407 W . North Temple

Page 54fuel_shipment_samples

supplier_city

supplier_state

supplier_zip

lab_nam e lab_address lab_city lab_state lab_zip analysis_copies Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84528 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No Salt Lake City

UT 84116 SGS Huntington Utah Lab P. O. Box 1020

Huntington UT 84528 No

Page 55fuel_shipment_samples analysis_copies

Page 56fuel_sample_pollutants

facility _id shipment_id

sample_id fuel_pollutant pollutant_conc

pollutant_conc_units

pollutant_conc_ND

pollutant_conc_MDL 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Antim ony

(Sb) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Arsenic (As) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Barium (Ba) 95 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Bery llium (Be) 0.2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Cadmium (Cd) 0.3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Chromium (Cr) 13 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Cobalt (Co) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Copper (Cu) 5 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Lead (Pb) 3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Manganese (Mn) 11.9 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Mercury (Hg) 0.06 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Nickel (Ni) 8 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Apr 2009

HTGDC0409

Selenium (Se) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Antim ony

(Sb) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Arsenic (As) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Barium (Ba) 127 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Bery llium (Be) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Cadmium (Cd) 0.2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Chromium (Cr) 8 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Cobalt (Co) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Copper (Cu) 7 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Lead (Pb) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Manganese (Mn) 4.5 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Mercury (Hg) 0.02 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Nickel (Ni) 6 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Aug 2009

HTGDC0809

Selenium (Se) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Antim ony

(Sb) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Arsenic (As) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Barium (Ba) 107 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Bery llium (Be) 0.3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Cadmium (Cd) 0.3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Chromium (Cr) 15 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Cobalt (Co) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Copper (Cu) 8 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Lead (Pb) 4 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Manganese (Mn) 7.8 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Mercury (Hg) 0.05 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Nickel (Ni) 8 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Jan 2009

HTGDC0109

Selenium (Se) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Antim ony

(Sb) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Arsenic (As) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Barium (Ba) 121 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Bery llium (Be) 3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Cadmium (Cd) 0.2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Chromium (Cr) 10 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Cobalt (Co) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Copper (Cu) 6 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Lead (Pb) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Manganese (Mn) 5.4 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Mercury (Hg) 0.03 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Nickel (Ni) 6 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE Page 57fuel_sample_pollutants

8069 DC Oct 2009

HTGDC1009

Selenium (Se) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Antim ony

(Sb) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Arsenic (As) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Barium (Ba) 78 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Bery llium (Be) 0.4 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Cadmium (Cd) 0.2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Chromium (Cr) 10 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Cobalt (Co) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Copper (Cu) 3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Lead (Pb) 3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Manganese (Mn) 10.8 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Mercury (Hg) 0.02 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Nickel (Ni) 6 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Apr 2009

HTGDG0409

Selenium (Se) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Antim ony

(Sb) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Arsenic (As) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Barium (Ba) 74 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Bery llium (Be) 0.7 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Cadmium (Cd) 0.2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Chromium (Cr) 8 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Cobalt (Co) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Copper (Cu) 4 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Lead (Pb) 3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Manganese (Mn) 12 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Mercury (Hg) 0.02 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Nickel (Ni) 6 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Aug 2009

HTGDG0809

Selenium (Se) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Antim ony

(Sb) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Arsenic (As) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Barium (Ba) 119 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Bery llium (Be) 0.5 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Cadmium (Cd) 0.3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Chromium (Cr) 13 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Cobalt (Co) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Copper (Cu) 5 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Lead (Pb) 5 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Manganese (Mn) 35.6 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Mercury (Hg) 0.03 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Nickel (Ni) 7 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Jan 2009

HTGDG0109

Selenium (Se) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Antim ony

(Sb) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Arsenic (As) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Barium (Ba) 127 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Bery llium (Be) 0.2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Cadmium (Cd) 0.2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Chromium (Cr) 8 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Cobalt (Co) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Copper (Cu) 7 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Lead (Pb) 2 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Manganese (Mn) 16.3 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Mercury (Hg) 0.02 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE 8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Nickel (Ni) 6 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE Page 58fuel_sample_pollutants

8069 DG Oct 2009

HTGDG1009

Selenium (Se) 1 parts per million (dry) (ppm) FALSE

Page 59test_reports

facility _id report_id report_ty pe other_ty pe report_description report_begin_date

report_end_date

before_control

during_deviation 8069 U1 Mercury

CEM Certification Test compliance Initial U1 Mercury CEMS Certification Test 8/5/2008 8/6/2008 No No 8069 Unit 2 Mercury

CEMS Certification Test compliance Initial Unit 2 Mercury CEMS Certification RATA 2/23/2009 2/26/2009 No No

Page 60test_reports

deviation_reports No No

Page 61test_report_configurations

facility _id report_id configuration_id 8069 U1 Mercury

CEM Certification Test Htg 1 8069 Unit 2 Mercury

CEMS Certification Test Htg 2

Page 62test_report_fuels

facility _id report_id fuel_id 8069 U1 Mercury

CEM Certification Test Bitum inous Coal 8069 Unit 2 Mercury

CEMS Certification Test Bitum inous Coal

Page 63test_report_fuel_ty pes

facility _id report_id fuel_id fuel_ty pe percentage_massvol percentage_btu

other_ty pe 8069 U1 Mercury

CEM Certification Test Bitum inous Coal

coal - bituminous 100 100 8069 Unit 2 Mercury

CEMS Certification Test Bitum inous Coal

coal - bituminous 100 100

Page 64cem_data

facility _id tim e_period

cem_period_description 6101 11/4/2008 to the present 8069 August 7, 2008 to Dec 31, 2009.

U1 Mercury

CEMS data are available from the Certification testing to present. 8069 Feb 27, 2009 to Dec 31, 2009

Except for periods of unit or monitor downtime, mercury CEMS data for U2 are available from the CEMS certification date to the present time. 8069 Jan 1 2005 to present for U1 and U2

NOx and SO2 data are available for Units 1 & 2 for the time period of this request (1/1/2005) to present. 8069 July

16, 2009 to present CO CEMS data for U1 are available from July 16, 2009 (certification RATA) to present.

Page 65cem_data

Except for periods of unit or monitor downtime, mercury CEMS data for U2 are available from the CEMS certification date to the present time. NOx and SO2 data are available for Units 1 & 2 for the time period of this request (1/1/2005) to present. CO CEMS data for U1 are available from July 16, 2009 (certification RATA) to present.

Page 66cem_data_pollutants1

facility _id tim e_period

pollutant_nam e 6101 11/4/2008 to the present

Total Mercury

(Hgt) 8069 Feb 27, 2009 to Dec 31, 2009

Total Mercury

(Hgt) 8069 August 7, 2008 to Dec 31, 2009.

Total Mercury

(Hgt) 8069 Jan 1 2005 to present for U1 and U2

Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 8069 Jan 1 2005 to present for U1 and U2

Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 8069 July

16, 2009 to present Carbon Monoxide (CO)

Page 67test_report_sampling

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id point_differ point_description befre_SO2_device

point_orientation

normal_by pass_percent

testing_by pass_percent 8069 U1 Mercury

CEM Certification Test Stk1 No No 8069 Unit 2 Mercury

CEMS Certification Test Stk2 No No

Page 68test_report_sampling

fg_fraction

Page 69sampling_runs

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id start_datetime end_datetim e

unit_load net_generation fg_moisture_content 8069 U1 Mercury

CEM Certification Test Stk1 average 8/5/2008 8/6/2008 8069 Unit 2 Mercury

CEMS Certification Test Stk2 average 2/23/2009 2/26/2009

Page 70sampling_runs

fg_flow_rate

fg_flow_rate_units

standard_temperature

standard_pressure

normal_temperature

normal_pressure

fg_oxygen_content

fg_CO2_content

fg_temperature

Page 71sampling_runs

fg_pressure

Hg_loi test_method run_comments

fuel_id fuel_unit_load fuel_flow_rate

fuel_ash fuel_heating_value EPA Reference Method 30B and Performance Specification 12A. Bitum inous Coal EPA 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 12A

Page 72sampling_runs

fuel_sulfur

Page 73sampling_run_pollutants1

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id pollutant_nam e conc conc_units conc_ND conc_MDL 8069 U1 Mercury

CEM Certification Test Stk1 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 0.51 mi crogram per dry standard cubic meter ( FALSE 8069 Unit 2 Mercury

CEMS Certification Test Stk2 average Total Mercury (Hgt) 0.11 mi crogram per normal cubic meter (

FALSE

Page 74sampling_run_pollutants1

em ission_rate

em ission_rate_units

em ission_rate_ND

em ission_rate_MDL

em ission_factor

em ission_factor_units

em ission_factor_ND

em ission_factor_MDL

run_pollutant_comment FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

Page 75sampling_run_pollutants1 run_pollutant_comment

Page 76sampling_run_fuel

facility _id report_id sampling_port_id run_id fuel_pollutant fuel_conc fuel_conc_units fuel_conc_ND

fuel_conc_MDL

Page 77sampling_run_fuel fuel_conc_MDL

Page 78