alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 102-33.285 Do we need to include any special disclaimers in our exchange/sale agreements for non-certificated aircraft or aircraft that we have operated as public aircraft (i.e., not in compliance with 14 CFR)?

Yes, when you exchange/sell non-certificated aircraft or aircraft maintained as public aircraft, you must ensure that the exchange/sale offerings contain the following statement:

“*Warning to purchasers/recipients.* The aircraft you are purchasing or receiving in an exchange may not be in compliance with applicable Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements. You are solely responsible for bringing the aircraft into compliance with 14 CFR Chapter I, or other applicable standards, by obtaining all necessary FAA inspections or modifications.

The purchaser/recipient agrees that the Government shall not be held liable for personal injuries to, disabilities of, or death of the purchaser/recipient, the purchaser's/recipient's employees, or to any other persons arising from or incident to the purchase of this aircraft, its use, or disposition. You will hold the Government harmless from any or all debts, liabilities, judgments, costs, demands, suits, actions, or claims of any nature arising from or incident to the purchase, use, or resale of this item. This aircraft may have been operated outside the limitations of 14 CFR Chapter I, and some type of inspection may be needed to determine its airworthiness prior to being flown. You should be aware of the items below prior to operating this aircraft.

• All civil and public aircraft must have a valid registration issued by the FAA as required by 14 CFR Chapter I.

• Civil aircraft must have a valid airworthiness certificate in order to operate in the U.S. airspace.

• In order for the aircraft to be eligible for a standard airworthiness certificate, the aircraft must conform to its FAA Type Certificate.

• Aircraft not having a valid airworthiness certificate may be eligible for a special FAA one-time flight permit to enable relocating the aircraft. Relocation can be for a number of reasons, including storage, repair, inspection, or public display. Any one-time flight approval is predicated on the aircraft being safe for flight.

• Individuals who purchase a surplus military (foreign or domestic) or foreign aircraft not having any type of FAA Type Certificate may be unable to obtain any type of airworthiness certificate or special flight permit.

• An aircraft with good maintenance and inspection records makes an airworthiness determination easier to ascertain. It is in your best interest to contact the nearest FAA Flight Standards District Office and discuss your responsibilities with respect to gaining an airworthiness determination. The location of your nearest FAA office may be obtained from the FAA's Web site (*http://www.faa.gov/*).

• When the aircraft is purchased for spare parts and the airframe is scrapped, you should declassify the aircraft (see § 102-33.420 for more information), complete the back of the aircraft's registration form and send it to: The FAA Aircraft Registration Branch, P.O. Box 25504, Oklahoma City, OK 73125-0504.”
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

843 

KA 10-01787 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ERIC STEPHENS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank P. Geraci,

Jr., J.), entered August 2, 2010. The order determined that defendant

is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a

level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act

(Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court

erred in failing to determine that he was entitled to a downward

departure to a level two risk. Defendant failed to preserve that

contention for our review inasmuch as there is no indication in the

record that he requested such a departure (see People v Ratcliff, 53

AD3d 1110, lv denied 11 NY3d 708). In any event, we conclude that

“defendant failed to present clear and convincing evidence of special

circumstances justifying a downward departure” (People v McDaniel, 27

AD3d 1158, 1159, lv denied 7 NY3d 703; see People v Fredendall, 83

AD3d 1545).

Entered: July 1, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report of Genio Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 12, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Andrew J. Schenker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Andrew J. Schenker
-----------------------------------
Andrew J. Schenker
Chief Financial Officer
January 12, 2004

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 676

To amend the Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act to conform that

Act with the judgments of the United States Federal Courts regarding

the rights and sovereign status of certain Indian Tribes, including the

Narragansett Tribe, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1999

Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act

to conform that Act with the judgments of the United

States Federal Courts regarding the rights and sovereign

status of certain Indian Tribes, including the Narragansett Tribe, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Narragansett Justice

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 676 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

2 Section 9(b) of the Rhode Island Indian Claims Set3 tlement Act (25 U.S.C. 1708(b)) is amended by striking

4 ‘‘not’’.

Æ
#### § 102-73.210 What types of special purpose space may the Office of Thrift Supervision lease?

The Office of Thrift Supervision is delegated authority to lease space for field offices of Examining Divisions required to be located within Office of Thrift Supervision buildings or immediately adjoining or adjacent to such buildings (lease terms, including all options, limited to 5 years).
Dr. Jehyra M. Asencio Yace joined AmeriCorps in 2020 as a Portfolio Manager in the Mid-Atlantic Region. She completed her PhD in Interdisciplinary Social Sciences at the University of Brasilia and was a Research Fellow at the Brazilian Institute for Racial and Ethnic Inclusion. Beyond academia, she has worked and volunteered with non-profits in the areas of environmental stewardship, disaster preparedness and social justice which has made her a passionate advocate for resilient organizational capacity building. Jehyra manages several research and evidence building projects within ORE, some through the formal role of a Contracting Officer Representative (COR). She lives in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico with her husband and a hilarious rescue Pitbull named “Boogie”. After work you can find her camping in the rainforest, cooking plant-based meals, swimming in calm Caribbean waters or volunteering. Her perfect sandwich is made of “casabe toast” (made with cassava flour), thick avocado slices, tomatoes, olive oil, sea salt and Aleppo pepper.

# image.png
Exhibit 15 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: Re: Registration Statement
Nos. 333-45525, 333-13584, 333-88681, 333-101849, 333-115979,
333-115980, 333-115981, 333-130793, 333-130792 and 333-143409 Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated
August 7, 2008 related to our review of
interim financial information. Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by
an independent registered public accounting firm,
or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public
accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act. /s/ KPMG LLP Washington, D.C.
August 7, 2008
#### § 102-118.590 May my agency appeal a prepayment audit decision of the GSA Transportation Audits Division?

No, your agency may not appeal. A GSA Transportation Audits Division decision is administratively final for your agency.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32326, May 31, 2022]
#### § 102-73.340 How must Federal lessees provide information to GSA?

Federal lessees must submit the required information to GSA by email at *SFLA@gsa.gov*.
#### § 102-36.30 When is personal property excess?

Personal property is excess when it is no longer needed by the activities within your agency to carry out the functions of official programs, as determined by the agency head or designee.
EXHIBIT 99.9



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:


         SUNBEAM CORPORATION ANNOUNCES NEW $500 MILLION CREDIT FACILITY

         FORT LAUDERDALE, FL - September 17, 1996 - Sunbeam Corporation
(NYSE:SOC) announced today that it has successfully closed on a new five year,
$500 million credit facility with 15 participating banks. This new facility,
agented by Chase Manhattan Bank, provides Sunbeam with the flexibility required
to restructure and grow the business.
         Albert J. Dunlap, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sunbeam
stated, "We feel this facility, which was significantly over-subscribed,
demonstrates the participating banks' strong support of the Company and its new
management team." Mr. Dunlap added, "We are continuing to rapidly restructure
every aspect of the Company and develop a solid growth strategy which this
credit facility will support."
         Sunbeam Corporation is a leading consumer products company that
designs, manufactures and markets, nationally and internationally, a diverse
portfolio of outdoor and household brand name products. The Company's Sunbeam(R)
and Oster(R) brands have been household names for generations, both domestically
and abroad, and the Company is a market leader in many of its product
categories.


                                ****************



Contact: Media:                            Investor Relations:
         Pete Judice                       John DeSimone
         (212) 614 - 4506                  Sunbeam Corporation
                                           (954)767-2100
Exhibit13.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form20-F of Stena AB (publ) (the "Company") forthe year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), Dan Sten Olsson, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Svante Carlsson, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

/s/ Dan StenOlsson                   Name: Dan StenOlsson Title: Chief Executive Officer Date: June 22, 2005

/s/ SvanteCarlsson                    Name: SvanteCarlsson Title: Chief Financial Officer Date: June 22,2005

This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
§ 3055.3 Reporting exceptions. ( a ) The Postal Service may petition the Commission to request that a product, or component of a product, be excluded from reporting, provided the Postal Service demonstrates that: ( 1 ) The cost of implementing a measurement system would be prohibitive in relation to the revenue generated by the product, or component of a product;
( 2 ) The product, or component of a product, defies meaningful measurement; or
( 3 ) The product, or component of a product, is in the form of a negotiated service agreement with substantially all components of the agreement included in the measurement of other products.
( b ) The Postal Service shall identify each product or component of a product granted an exception in each report required under subparts A or B of this part, and certify that the rationale for originally granting the exception remains valid.
§ 102-36.115 What information must we include in the authorization form for non-federal persons to screen excess personal property? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67866 , Aug. 22, 2024.
( a ) For non-federal persons to screen excess personal property, you must provide on the authorization form: ( 1 ) The individual's name and the organization he/she represents;
( 2 ) The period of time and location(s) in which screening will be conducted; and
( 3 ) The number and completion date of the applicable contract, cooperative agreement, or grant.
( b ) An authorized official of your agency must sign the authorization form.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3432

_____________________________

LA TISSHA M. JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

May 25, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of the trial court’s denial of 

her motion to reduce or modify her sentence filed pursuant to 

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). The trial court 

dismissed the motion as untimely. However, the motion was filed 

within sixty days of the date that this Court issued the mandates

in her direct appeals. See Bailey v. State, 136 So. 3d 615, 616 (Fla. 

2d DCA 2013) (“[A] rule 3.800(c) motion is considered filed when 

entrusted to prison officials for further delivery or processing.”). As 

the State concedes, the motion was timely filed. See Fla. R. Crim. 

P. 3.800(c).

The trial court’s failure to consider Petitioner’s rule 3.800(c) 

motion on the merits was a departure from the essential 

requirements of law. See Bacchus v. State, 958 So. 2d 1016, 1017 
2

(Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of 

certiorari, vacate the order dismissing Petitioner’s rule 3.800(c) 

motion, and remand with directions to consider the motion on its 

merits.

OSTERHAUS, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

La Tissha M. Johnson, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven E. Woods, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI-DADE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 22-CV-23657-PCH

WINDY LUCIUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MERCI MERCI ME, LLC., d/b/a Le Zoo

Defendant.

______________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, WINDY LUCIUS, by and through the undersigned counsel, 

hereby notifies the Court that the Parties have reached an agreement in principle that resolves all 

claims that were or could have been brought in this action and are in the process of working on the 

Settlement Agreement. The Parties request that the Court stay all matters and pending deadlines 

in this action and grant the Parties sixty (60) days to finalize their written Settlement Agreement 

and to submit the appropriate notices and/or stipulations to the Court regarding dismissal of the 

Action.

Respectfully submitted on this December 13, 2022. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23657-PCH Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2022 Page 1 of 2
Lucius v. Merci Merci Me, et al

Case No. 22-cv-23657-PCH

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 13, 2022, an electronic copy of the foregoing 

document was filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notice of 

electronic filing to all parties and Counsel of record. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23657-PCH Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 102-193.10 What are the goals of the Federal Records Management Program? The statutory goals of the Federal Records Management Program are: ( a ) Accurate and complete documentation of the policies and transactions of the Federal Government.
( b ) Control of the quantity and quality of records produced by the Federal Government.
( c ) Establishment and maintenance of management controls that prevent the creation of unnecessary records and promote effective and economical agency operations.
( d ) Simplification of the activities, systems, and processes of records creation, maintenance, and use.
( e ) Judicious preservation and disposal of records.
( f ) Direction of continuing attention on records from initial creation to final disposition, with particular emphasis on the prevention of unnecessary Federal paperwork.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    405,877
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               476,216
<PP&E>                                         634,647
<DEPRECIATION>                                 400,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 799,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          428,105
<BONDS>                                        176,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     33,369
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   799,635
<SALES>                                        150,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,018
<CGS>                                         (28,529)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (28,529)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,734
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            119,734
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of Form 10-Q dated March 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              83
<SECURITIES>                                       100
<RECEIVABLES>                                      125
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1
<INVENTORY>                                         34
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   370
<PP&E>                                             432
<DEPRECIATION>                                     100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               85
<BONDS>                                            908
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,403
<SALES>                                             54
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   131
<CGS>                                               29
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       64
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     43
<INCOME-TAX>                                        15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 28
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        28
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 8

Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 153-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2024 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 153-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2024 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:22-cv-24023-RNS Document 153-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2024 Page 3 of 3
#### § 102-72.50 What are Executive agencies' responsibilities under a delegation of real property management and operation authority from GSA?

With this delegation, Executive agencies have the authority to operate and manage buildings day to day. Delegated functions may include building operations, maintenance, recurring repairs, minor alterations, historic preservation, concessions, and energy management of specified buildings subject to the conditions in the delegation document.