alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5474

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective date for

an award of disability compensation by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs

under section 1151 of such title for persons disabled by treatment or

vocational rehabilitation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 17, 2000

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective

date for an award of disability compensation by the

Secretary of Veterans Affairs under section 1151 of such

title for persons disabled by treatment or vocational rehabilitation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5474 IH

1 SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AWARDS OF DISABILITY

2 COMPENSATION MADE BY THE SECRETARY

3 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR PERSONS DIS4 ABLED BY TREATMENT OR VOCATIONAL RE5 HABILITATION.

6 (a) CHANGE IN RETROACTIVITY RULE.—Section

7 5110(c) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by

8 striking ‘‘if an application therefor is received within one

9 year from such date’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any award of

12 disability compensation by reason of section 1151 of title

13 38, United States Code, made before, on, or after the date

14 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 15 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: Re: Registration Statement
Nos. 333-45525, 333-13584, 333-88681, 333-101849, 333-115979,
333-115980, 333-115981, 333-130793, 333-130792 and 333-143409 Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated
November 10, 2008 related to our review of
interim financial information. Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by
an independent registered public accounting firm,
or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public
accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act. /s/ KPMG LLP Washington, D.C.
November 10, 2008
#### § 102-37.275 May a SASP accept personal checks and non-official payment methods in payment of service charges?

No, service charge payments must readily identify the donee institution as the payer (or the name of the parent organization when that organization pays the operational expenses of the donee). Personal checks, personal cashier checks, personal money orders, and personal credit cards are not acceptable.
#### FREDERICKE E. KUSE, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, *v.*THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

Appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried.

The only exception insisted on upon this appeal was that the court should have dismissed the complaint. The General Term *held,*that the evidence was such as to require a submission of the case to the j ury, and affirmed the order.

*Calvin G. Child,*for the appellant.

*D. R. Jaques*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Order affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37811-37812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15283]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3262]


State of North Carolina

    Alamance County and the contiguous counties of Caswell, Chatham, 
Guilford, Orange, Randolph, and Rockingham in the State of North 
Carolina constitute a

[[Page 37812]]

disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms, winds, and a 
tornado that occurred on May 25, 2000. Applications for loans for 
physical damage as a result of this disaster may be filed until the 
close of business on August 4, 2000 and for economic injury until the 
close of business on March 5, 2001 at the address listed below or other 
locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 
30308.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
    HOMEOWNERS WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE.............        7.375
    HOMEOWNERS WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE..........        3.687
    BUSINESSES WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE.............        8.000
    BUSINESSES AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS WITHOUT CREDIT         4.000
     AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE...................................
    OTHERS (INCLUDING NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS) WITH CREDIT        6.750
     AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE...................................
For Economic Injury:
    BUSINESSES AND SMALL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES WITHOUT         4.000
     CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The numbers assigned to this disaster are 326211 for physical 
damage and 9H4900 for economic injury.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: June 5, 2000.
Kris Swedin,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-15283 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al.,

 Plaintiff,

- v. - 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

 

Defendant.

____________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO HAC VICE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Andrew B. Brettler, Esq., of Berk Brettler LLP, hereby 

enters his appearance on behalf of Solomid Corporation in the above-captioned matter and 

respectfully requests that copies of all future pleadings, orders, and other papers be provided to the 

undersigned.

Per Rule 4(b)(4) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, Mr. Brettler was previously admitted 

to appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendant Kevin O’Leary and states that all 

information provided in support of his initial pro hac vice motion remains current and correct, 

including the sponsoring co-counsel.

Dated: June 7, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jeffrey A. Neiman

Jeffrey A. Neiman

Florida Bar No. 544469

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 227 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/07/2023 Page 1 of 2
MARCUS NEIMAN RASHBAUM & 

PINEIRO LLP 

100 SE 3rd Ave Ste 805

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394

Telephone: (954) 462-1200

jneiman@mnrlawfirm.com 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 7, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Appearance was served via CM/ECF on all counsel or parties of record on the Service List.

By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Neiman 

 Jeffrey A. Neiman

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 227 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/07/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 952.1 Authority.

These rules of practice are issued by the Judicial Officer of the United States Postal Service (see § 952.26) pursuant to authority delegated by the Postmaster General, and in accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3005, and are governed by the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551, *et seq.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Edwin Garrison, et al., on behalf of themselves and 

all others similarly situated 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Sam Bankman-Fried, et al.,

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 22-cv-23753 

 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Edward Soto hereby makes an appearance as counsel of 

record for Defendant SHOHEI OHTANI, and directs that all responsive pleadings and papers in 

the above action be served upon the following: 

Edward Soto 

Edward.soto@weil.com 

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 

1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200 

Miami, Florida 33131 

DATED: March 22, 2023 

Miami, Florida 

Respectfully submitted, 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

By: /s/ Edward Soto 

Edward Soto (Fla Bar. No. 0265144) 

edward.soto@weil.com 

1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200 

Miami, FL 33131-3368 

(305) 577-3100 

Attorneys for Defendant Shohei Ohtani 

 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 102 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2023 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically with the Clerk 

of the Court using CM/ECF on March 22, 2023. As such, the foregoing was served 

electronically upon all counsel of record. 

/s/ Edward Soto 

 Edward Soto (FBN 265144) 

Edward.soto@weil.com 

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 

1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200 

Miami, Florida 33131 

(305) 577-3100 (Telephone) 

(305) 374-7159 (Facsimile) 

Counsel for Defendant Shohei Ohtani 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 102 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2023 Page 2 of 2
SERVED: DECEMBER 15, 2010 

•^E^ARTMENTOF 

"-'•MJRpORTATiON 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -r f PiOCPATlOMQ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS '"' ^ " ' ^^^"^^^ WASHINGTON, DC ib A a-35 

IN THE MATTER OF 

HARRISON YACHT SALES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-0626 

NOTICE OF HEARING 

Notice is hereby given that a hearing in the above-entitled matter will be held beginning 

Febraary 3, 2011, at 10 a.m., Eastern Time, at the Department of Transportation Hearing Room, 

Room E12-300, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., Washington, DC 20590. 

Each party shall serve on the other party and deliver to the Judge, by January 18, 2011, 

two copies of each exhibit to be offered at the hearing (consecutively numbered, and separately 

tabbed and paginated), and a list of witnesses, together with a summary of their proposed 

testimony. In addition, each party should bring an original and two copies of each proposed 

exhibit (consecutively numbered, and separately tabbed and paginated) for presentation at the 

hearing. 

Parties should allow time to pass through security and should note that recording 

equipment, including cameras and cellular telephones incorporating cameras, is not permitted in 

the hearing room. 

Konnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative La 

Attachment - Service List 
W' 

FAA Docket No. CP10EA0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & dNE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE CCM»Y 

David Harrison, President 

Harrison Yacht Sales, Inc., Respondent 

106 Wells Cove Road 

P.O. Box 98 

Grasonville, MD 21638 

TEL: 410-827-7800 

FAX: 410-827-4830 

Mary Madeline McCarthy, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, EAL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Eastern Region 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3259 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by e}q>edited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000, 

Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
#### § 957.16 Official record.

The transcript of testimony together with all pleadings, orders, exhibits, briefs, and other documents filed in the proceeding shall constitute the official record of the proceeding.
**Exhibit99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Sento Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stanley J. Cutler,Senior Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Stanley J. Cutler                                          |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                            |   |
| Stanley  J. Cutler                                              |
| Senior  Vice President of Finance (Principal Financial Officer) |
| February  12, 2002                                              |

 

----
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Kerri S. Bernstein,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the American Express Credit Account Master Trust (the “Exchange Act periodicreports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicingagreements in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, Ihave reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and Exela Technologies, Inc. 

 
Date: March 25, 2019By: 
/s/ Kerri S. Bernstein
Name: Kerri S. BernsteinTitle: President, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation III LLC (Senior officer in charge of securitization)**
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6401
MELVIN LEE HAWKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. T. MAHON, Warden; LIEUTENANT BAKER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-94-759) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Lee Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hawkins v. Mahon , No. CA-94-759 (W.D. Va. Feb. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
OF THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT I, Craig T. Davenport, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Endocare, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 15, 2005
    /s/ Craig T. DavenportCraig T. DavenportChief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ZANTAC (RANITIDINE) PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2924

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −99)

On February 6, 2020, the Panel transferred 12 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1407. See 437 F.Supp.3d 1368 (J.P.M.L. 2020). Since that time, 398 additional action(s) have been

transferred to the Southern District of Florida. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been

assigned to the Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg.

It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the

actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Florida and assigned to Judge Rosenberg.

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,

the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of

Florida for the reasons stated in the order of February 6, 2020, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to

the Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Florida. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days

from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day

period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

John W. Nichols

Clerk of the Panel

Case MDL No. 2924 Document 1072 Filed 09/02/22 Page 1 of 2

Sep 02, 2022 PE Sep 2, 2022 MIAMI

Case 9:20-md-02924-RLR Document 5983 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2022 Page 1 of 2

Patrick Edwards Sep 6, 2022

Case 9:22-cv-81371-RLR Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2022 Page 1 of 2
IN RE: ZANTAC (RANITIDINE) PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2924

SCHEDULE CTO−99 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 3 22−04730 Hinds, et al. v. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.

CAN 4 22−04731 Torres, et al. v. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.

CAN 3 22−04768 Goetz et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration

DELAWARE

DE 1 22−01093 Ard et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al

DE 1 22−01094 Acevedo et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al

DE 1 22−01095 Adkins et al. v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al

Opposed 8/29/22

Opposed 8/29/22

Case MDL No. 2924 Document 1072 Filed 09/02/22 Page 2 of 2

Case 9:20-md-02924-RLR Document 5983 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2022 Page 2 of 2 Case 9:22-cv-81371-RLR Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2022 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley D. Tilden, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                      
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                        | 
|By                      |  | /s/ Bradley D. Tilden
|Bradley D. Tilden      
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 7, 2008