UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.:

MAGDO DE OLIVEIRA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

NEDAS CORPORATION D/B/A

ALLIED MARBLE & GRANITE, 

NEDAS TAUSKELA, 

INGRIDA TAUSKELA, 

Defendants.

__________________________________/

COMPLAINT

{Jury Trial Demanded}

Plaintiff, MAGDO DE OLIVEIRA (“Oliveira”), brings this action against Defendants, 

NEDAS CORPORATION D/B/A ALLIED MARBLE & GRANITE (“AMG”), NEDAS 

TAUSKELA (“N. Tauskela”), and INGRIDA TAUSKELA (“I. Tauskela”), and alleges as follows:

1. This is an action arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 

(“FLSA”). Jurisdiction is conferred on this Court by 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).

2. At all times material hereto, Oliveira was a resident of Florida and an “employee” of 

Defendants as defined by the FLSA.

3. At all times material hereto, AMG was a Florida corporation that regularly transacted 

business in Broward County, Florida.

4. N. Tauskela is an FLSA employer as defined in 29 U.S.C. § 203(d), is an owner and/or 

manager of AMG, ran the day-to-day operations and had operational control over AMG, and was 

directly involved in decisions affecting duties, employee compensation, and hours worked by 

employees, such as Oliveira.

Case 0:22-cv-62016-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/30/2022 Page 1 of 3
5. I. Tauskela is an FLSA employer as defined in 29 U.S.C. § 203(d), is an owner and/or 

manager of AMG, ran the day-to-day operations and had operational control over AMG, and was 

directly involved in decisions affecting duties, employee compensation, and hours worked by 

employees, such as Oliveira.

6. AMG’s business involves marble and granite sales and installation.

7. Defendants have employees handling, selling, or otherwise working on goods or materials 

that have been moved in or produced for commerce including but not limited to computers, phones, 

pens, and paper.

8. Upon information and belief, AMG’s gross sales or business done was in excess of 

$500,000 per year at all times material hereto.

9. AMG was an enterprise engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce 

and is covered by the FLSA at all times material hereto.

10. Oliveira worked for Defendants as a installer.

11. Defendants failed to pay Oliveira’s full and proper overtime wages.

12. Defendants knowingly and willfully refused to pay Oliveira’s legally-entitled wages.

13. Attached as Exhibit A is a preliminary calculation of Oliveira’s claims. These amounts 

may change as Oliveira engages in the discovery process.

14. Oliveira retained the services of the undersigned and is obligated to pay for the legal 

services provided.

Case 0:22-cv-62016-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/30/2022 Page 2 of 3
COUNT I

VIOLATION OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT

AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS

15. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1-14 above as if

set forth herein in full.

16. Plaintiff alleges this action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 216 (b), 

that Plaintiff is entitled to: (i) time-and-a-half overtime pay and (ii) liquidated damages pursuant 

to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq.

17. Plaintiff seeks recovery of damages as referenced above and further seeks interest, costs, 

and attorneys’ fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants, jointly and severally, plus 

costs, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and such other remedy as the court deems just and appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Koz Law, P.A.

800 East Cypress Creek Road Suite 421

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33334

Tel: (786) 924-9929

Fax: (786) 358-6071

Email: ekoz@kozlawfirm.com

Elliot Kozolchyk, Esq.

Bar No.: 74791

Case 0:22-cv-62016-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/30/2022 Page 3 of 3