alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 955.14 Settling the record. ( a ) The record upon which the Board's decision will be rendered consists of the appeal file described in § 955.5, and to the extent the following items have been filed, pleadings, prehearing conference memoranda or orders, prehearing briefs, depositions or interrogatories received in evidence, admissions, stipulations, transcripts of conferences and hearings, hearing exhibits, posthearing briefs, and documents which the Board has specifically designated be made a part of the record.
( b ) Except as the Board may otherwise order in its discretion, no proof shall be received in evidence after completion of an oral hearing or, in cases submitted on the record, after notification by the Board that the case is ready for decision.
( c ) The weight to be attached to any evidence of record will rest within the sound discretion of the Board. The Board may in any case require either party, with appropriate notice to the other party, to submit additional evidence on any matter relevant to the appeal.
( d ) The Board may consider the Federal Rules of Evidence for guidance regarding admissibility of evidence and other evidentiary issues in construing those Board rules that are similar to Federal Rules and for matters not specifically covered herein.
[74 FR 20592, May 5, 2009, as amended at 80 FR 31305, June 2, 2015]
Eagle Sight Photographer LLC requests the following exemptions under Section 333:

Part	21	Subpart	H Airworthiness certification 14	C.F.R.	§	45.23(b) Markings 14	C.F.R.	§	61.113(a)	and	(b) Private pilot privileges 14	C.F.R.	§	61.133(a) Commercial pilot privileges 14	C.F.R.	§	91.7(a)	and	(b) Civil aircraft airworthiness 14	C.F.R.	§ 91.119 Minimum safe altitudes 14	C.F.R.	§	91.121 Altimeter settings 14	C.F.R.	§	91.151(a) Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions 14	C.F.R.	§	91.203(a)(1)	and(2) conditions Civil aircraft certifications 14	C.F.R.	§	91.405;	407;	409;	417 Maint enance inspections and also add the same rules to flights as in 95

- 112 as in the ama guide lines

wo uld also like to add New Ham pshire RSA 231 bridge inspections to list of activity’ s of use of my Dji Phantom 1 if the state of NH DOT request.

Eagle Sight Photographer will be the sole ( pic), In the future may or may not Have a second pic. If it ever decides to Eagle Sight Photographer will make sure they have the proper training min 50

- flight hrs with the proper training and safety procedures As I have over 15 years of R/C flying and R/C Aircraft building. A nd 10 Years as a R/C flight training pilot instructor

A list of all uses requested

Real Estate Land surveys Agricultural Weddings and special events Hotels, resorts, gulf courses Insp ections Roof inspections, Insurance Adjustin g Bridge Inspections for DOT if needed Search and Rescue if Needed (as I’m a first responderFire Departments if needed (as I’ m a fire fighter with in the state of NH

### August 9 th 

### , 2015 Page 1 of 2

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Wa shington, DC 20590

I would like to Submit this letter to the 333 Exemption I filed with you for consideration. Everything Submitted with be in the interest of the FAA and the general public and fire service and search and rescue.

From: Jason Bagley Easgle Sight Photographer LLC P.O. Box 2412 North Conway, NH 03860
- 2412 Phone (603) 986
- 0056 Email Jbcoos@aol.com I would also like to ask if the FAA could expedite my application progress. As being in the fire service and first responder. As it will benift us in the near by cases, and as in the pr ivate they will also fill out the proper papers, and ill continue my flight logs and time in air. Wi th a sign off for the owners or companys.
Sincerely, Jason bagley (Owner) Eagle Sight Photographer LLC.
Board of Taxation

No. 78-146

No. 78-147

#### Tri-State Timberland Corp. and Atkinson-Davis Corp. v. Town of Croydon

March 30, 1979

*William Howard Dunn,*of Claremont, by brief and orally, for the plaintiffs.

*Gardner & Clauson,*of Hanover *(K. William Clauson*orally), for the town of Croydon.

*Daniel D. Crean,*of Concord, for the New Hampshire Municipal Association as amicus curiae.

DOUGLAS, J.

 This appeal requires us to determine if the board of taxation is required to remand a case for valuation after the land has been classified as forest land appropriate for current use taxation. Because both the board of taxation and the town are bound by the range of values set by the current use advisory board for forest land, we hold that in this instance it was unnecessary for the board of taxation to remand the case. The Atkinson-Davis Corporation (Atkinson) and the Tri-State Timberland Corporation (Tri-State), as taxpayers, applied for current use assessment for certain land for the tax *194year 1977. The town of Croydon failed to notify them of its refusal to classify the land for current use. The taxpayers first were notified of this refusal when they received their 1977 tax bill. The taxpayers appealed to the board of taxation pursuant to RSA 79-A:9 (Supp. 1977). The town was properly notified of the board hearing set for June 1,1978. At the hearing, the board of taxation determined that the taxpayers’ land qualified for classification as forest land. This decision is not disputed. The board of taxation determined that the land should be taxed at thirty-five dollars an acre, based on the highest value set by the current use advisory board for forest land. The town argues that the board of taxation had no jurisdiction to determine the proper value for the taxpayers’ land. The town contends that the case should be remanded for determination of value. It bases its argument on RSA 79-A:5 I (Supp. 1977) which provides that

> [t]he selectmen or assessing officials shall appraise open space land, as classified under the provisions of this chapter .. . at valuations based upon current use values established by the board.

Although this section places the responsibility on the town assessors or selectmen for appraising land within the range of valuations established by the current use advisory board, the board of taxation based its valuation on the highest figure allowed by the advisory board’s regulations. A remand in this case would be dilatory and meritless because the town selectmen would be obligated to value the land at the same or lower rate. *Blue Mountain Forest Ass’n v. Town of Croydon,*119 N.H. 202, 400 A.2d 55(1979). Once land is classified for currentuse, the role of the local assessor is limited to determining the level of valuation within the guidelines issued by the current use advisory board. *Id.*The range for forest land is twenty to thirty-five dollars an acre. Because the board of taxation assessed the land at the highest possible value, the town is not aggrieved by the board of taxation decision.

*Appeal dismissed.*

All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5566 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5566

    To amend section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to 
 authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to waive the 
requirement that a family receiving project-based rental assistance be 
 notified one year in advance of termination of the contract for such 
 assistance in cases in which such termination facilitates purchase of 
                        the home by the tenant.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 2000

   Mr. Barrett of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to 
 authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to waive the 
requirement that a family receiving project-based rental assistance be 
 notified one year in advance of termination of the contract for such 
 assistance in cases in which such termination facilitates purchase of 
                        the home by the tenant.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tenants Housing Opportunity Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO WAIVE NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT.

    Section 8(c)(8) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 
1437f(c)(8)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
    ``(E) The Secretary may waive the requirements under this paragraph 
regarding advance notification of termination of a contract for 
assistance payments and any other requirements established pursuant to 
this paragraph that the Secretary considers appropriate, if the 
Secretary determines that--
            ``(i) the termination of the contract will provide the 
        families assisted under the contract an opportunity to purchase 
        the dwelling units for which such assistance was used;
            ``(ii) waiver of such requirements will result in the 
        immediate purchase of such dwelling units by such families; and
            ``(iii) such purchase will result in lower overall housing 
        costs for the purchasing families.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Caller,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
| Date: March 15, 2007                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |
|                                                             |
| /s/Robert C. Caller                                              |   |
| Robert C. Caller                                                 |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Treasurer |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                     |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
OF THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

I, Katherine Greenberg, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Endocare, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  December 2, 2003
    
    
    
    
    
    /s/ KATHERINE GREENBERGKatherine GreenbergSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer(principal accounting officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christie B.
Kelly, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.



/s/

Christie B. KellyChristie B. KellyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General PartnerDate: March 2, 2010


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, and will be retained by Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 00-069]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, Solar System Exploration Subcommittee. 

# DATES:

Wednesday, June 28, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Thursday, June 29, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Conference Room 3H 46, 300 E Street, SW Washington, DC 20546.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carl Pilcher, Code S, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546; (202) 358-2150.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public up to the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

Planetary Program Update

Research and Analysis Restructuring

Mars 2003 Mission Options 

Outer Solar System Science Strategy 

Response to Committee on Planetary Exploration Review of Solar System Roadmap 

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 

      ( print page 38005)    
Dated: June 8, 2000.

Matthew M. Crouch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 00-15326 Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
EXHIBIT 7
                                                                     ---------

                                 CERTIFICATION

         CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF
               CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the report of Western Oil Sands Inc. (the "Company") on the
Form 40-F for the  fiscal  year  ending  December  31,  2005 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge:

1.     The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.

DATED this 28th day of March, 2006.



/s/ David A. Dyck
-----------------------------------------
David A. Dyck
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer), Western Oil Sands Inc.
§ 102-192.70 What security policies and plans must we have? ( a ) Agencies must have a written mail security policy that applies throughout your agency.
( b ) Agencies must have a written mail security plan for each facility that processes mail, regardless of the facility's mail volume.
( c ) Agencies must have a security policy for employees receiving incoming and sending outgoing mail at an alternative worksite, such as a telework center.
( d ) The scope and level of detail of each facility mail security plan should be commensurate with the size and responsibilities of each facility. For small facilities, agencies may use a general plan for similar locations. For larger locations, agencies must develop a plan that is specifically tailored to the threats and risks at your location. Agencies should determine which facilities they consider small and large for the purposes of this section, so long as the basic requirements for a security plan are met at every facility.
( e ) All mail managers are required to annually report the status of their mail security plans to agency headquarters. At a minimum, these reports should assure that all mail security plans comply with the requirements of this part, including annual review by a subject matter expert and regular rehearsal of responses to various emergency situations by facility personnel.
( f ) A security professional who has expertise in mail center security should review the agency's mail security plan and policies annually to include identification of any deficiencies. Review of facility mail security plans can be accomplished by subject matter experts such as agency security personnel. If these experts are not available within your agency, seek assistance from the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (*https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/*) or the Federal Protective Service (FPS) (*http://www.dhs.gov/federal-protective-service*).
§ 102-34.60 How do we calculate the average fuel economy for Government motor vehicles? You must calculate the average fuel economy for Government motor vehicles as follows: ( a ) Because there are so many motor vehicle configurations, you must take an average of all light duty motor vehicles by category that your agency obtained and operated during the fiscal year.
( b ) This calculation is the sum of such light duty motor vehicles divided by the sum of the fractions representing the number of motor vehicles of each category by model divided by the unadjusted city/highway mile-per-gallon ratings for that model. The unadjusted city/highway mile-per-gallon ratings for each make and model are published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for each model year and published at *http://www.fueleconomy.gov .*
( c ) An example follows:
Light trucks: (i) 600 light trucks acquired in a specific year. These are broken down into: (A) 200 Six cylinder automatic transmission pick-up trucks, EPA rating: 24.3 mpg, plus (B) 150 Six cylinder automatic transmission mini-vans, EPA rating: 24.8 mpg, plus (C) 150 Eight cylinder automatic transmission pick-up trucks, EPA rating: 20.4 mpg, plus (D) 100 Eight cylinder automatic transmission cargo vans, EPA rating: 22.2 mpg.
(ii) Fleet average fuel economy for light trucks in this case is 23.0 mpg.
EXHIBIT 6
                                                                      ---------

                                  CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection  with the report of Western Oil Sands Inc. (the "Company") on the
Form 40-F for the  fiscal  year  ending  December  31,  2006 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that to the  best of my
knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
      Company.

DATED this 22nd day of February, 2007.



/s/ James C. Houck
------------------------------------------
James C. Houck
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
Western Oil Sands Inc.