alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 4/10/2012

Sample Number: 121423-001 Date Collected: 03/28/2012 08:30 Date Received: 3/28/2012

1st Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 371 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 04/10/2012 10:49 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 121423-002 Date Collected: 03/28/2012 08:30 Date Received: 3/28/2012

2nd Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 17.6 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 04/10/2012 10:54 EPA 200.8

Sample Number: 121423-003 Date Collected: 03/28/2012 08:30 Date Received: 3/28/2012

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Selenium, Se 0.8 ug/L 0.5 0.1 DPC 04/10/2012 10:59 EPA 200.8

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 121423 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-80144-CR-Smith/Maynard(s)(s)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOFF STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT,

MARIEL TOLLINCHI,

REGINE MARIE RENE, 

BRIANNA MONIQUE GAYLE,

MAURICE SHAZIER, and

ROBENSON LAUVINCE,

Defendants.

GOVERNMENT’S THIRD DISCOVERY RESPONSE

The United States respectfully supplements our discovery response in this matter. The 

government has provided additional discovery to the defense as summarized in the attached 

inventory.* All materials were disclosed via USAfx, the government’s filesharing program.

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: s/ Marc Osborne

Assistant United States Attorney

Court ID# A5500796

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Tel: (561) 209-1014

marc.osborne@usdoj.gov

* The listed discovery items were disclosed via USAfx on the dates specified in the inventory

to all defense counsel other than counsel for Mr. Lauvince. Mr. Lauvince was added to the case in 

the second superseding indictment. The government gave his counsel access to the USAfx discovery 

on December 19, 2022.

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/01/2023 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.21 of Part 101-6
Editorial Note: For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982, 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983, and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

§ 101-6.2101 What is the purpose of these regulations? ( a ) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” issued July 14, 1982, and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement applicable provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968.
( b ) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on State processes and on State, areawide, regional and local coordination for review of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development.
( c ) These regulations are intended to aid the internal management of GSA, and are not intended to create any right or benefit enforceable at law by a party against GSA or its officers.
<PAGE>


                               AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                             NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                      EXHIBIT 11


                                                     THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
                                                  -------------------------
                                                 August 31,   September 2,
                                                    1996          1995
                                                 ----------   ------------
Net income for computing earnings
  per common share                                $53,601       $43,042
                                                  -------       -------
                                                  -------       -------

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding during each period           924,653       927,398
                                                  -------       -------
                                                  -------       -------


Net income per common share                        $0.058        $0.046
                                                   ------        ------
                                                   ------        ------


                                   (11)                     PAGE 11 OF 11 PAGES
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 535 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 535

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections to a map 
           relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections to a map 
           relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make such corrections 
to the map described in subsection (b) as are necessary to move on that 
map the boundary of the otherwise protected area (as defined in section 
12 of the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3503 note; 
Public Law 101-591)) to the Cape Henlopen State Park boundary to the 
extent necessary--
            (1) to exclude from the otherwise protected area the 
        adjacent property leased, as of the date of enactment of this 
        Act, by the Barcroft Company and Cape Shores Associates (which 
        are privately held corporations under the law of the State of 
        Delaware); and
            (2) to include in the otherwise protected area the 
        northwestern corner of Cape Henlopen State Park seaward of the 
        Lewes and Rehoboth Canal.
    (b) Map Described.--The map described in this subsection is the map 
that is included in a set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'', dated October 24, 1990, as revised October 15, 1992, and that 
relates to the unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources System entitled 
``Cape Henlopen Unit DE-03P''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 102-38.285 How do we transfer title from the Government to the buyer for personal property sold? ( a ) Generally, no specific form or format is designated for transferring title from the Government to the buyer for personal property sold. For internal control and accountability, you must execute a bill of sale or another document as evidence of transfer of title or any other interest in Government personal property. You must also ensure that the buyer submits any additional certifications to comply with specific conditions and restrictions of the sale.
( b ) For sales of vehicles, you must issue to the purchaser a Standard Form (SF) 97, the United States Government Certificate to Obtain Title to a Vehicle, or a SF 97A, the United States Government Certificate to Obtain a Non-Repairable or Salvage Certificate, as appropriate, as evidence of transfer of title. For information on how to obtain these forms, see § 102-2.135 of this chapter.
# ToC

# A-9 Money amt-% by State

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-9: LTC Ombudsman Program Funding Totals and Percents for FY 2011	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-9: p. &P	

# Funding Totals by State

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-9: LTC Ombudsman Program Funding Totals and Percents for FY 2011	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-9: p. &P	

# Funding Percents by State

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-9: LTC Ombudsman Program Funding Totals and Percents for FY 2011	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-9: p. &P	

# A-9 Money amt-% by Region

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-9: LTC Ombudsman Program Funding Totals and Percents by Region for FY 2011	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-9: p. &P	

# Funding Totals by Region

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-9: LTC Ombudsman Program Funding Totals and Percents by Region for FY 2011	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-9: p. &P	

# Funding Percents by Region

&"Arial Rounded MT Bold,Bold"&14Table A-9: LTC Ombudsman Program Funding Totals and Percents by Region for FY 2011	

&"Arial Narrow,Regular"Table A-9: p. &P
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5637

To provide that an amount available for fiscal year 2001 for the Department

of Transportation shall be available to reimburse certain costs incurred

for clean-up of former Coast Guard facilities at Cape May, New Jersey,

and to authorize the Coast Guard to transfer funds and authority for

demolition and removal of a structure at former Coast Guard property

in Traverse City, Michigan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 4, 2000

Mr. SHUSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

DECEMBER 4, 2000

The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure discharged; considered

under suspension of the rules and passed

A BILL

To provide that an amount available for fiscal year 2001

for the Department of Transportation shall be available

to reimburse certain costs incurred for clean-up of former

Coast Guard facilities at Cape May, New Jersey, and

to authorize the Coast Guard to transfer funds and

authority for demolition and removal of a structure at

former Coast Guard property in Traverse City, Michigan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5637 CPH

1 SECTION 1. COSTS OF CLEAN-UP OF CAPE MAY LIGHT2 HOUSE.

3 Of the funds made available in the Department of

4 Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,

5 2001 for environmental compliance and restoration of

6 Coast Guard facilities, $100,000 shall be available to reim7 burse the owner of the former Coast Guard lighthouse fa8 cility at Cape May, New Jersey, for costs incurred for

9 clean-up of lead contaminated soil at that facility.

10 SEC. 2. DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF BUILDING AT

11 FORMER COAST GUARD PROPERTY IN TRA12 VERSE CITY, MICHIGAN.

13 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and sub14 ject to the availability of funds appropriated specifically

15 for the project, the Coast Guard is authorized to transfer

16 funds in an amount not to exceed $200,000 and project

17 management authority to the Traverse City Area Public

18 School District for the purposes of demolition and removal

19 of the structure commonly known as ‘‘Building 402’’ at

20 former Coast Guard property located in Traverse City,

21 Michigan, and associated site work. No such funds shall

22 be transferred until the Coast Guard receives a detailed,

23 fixed price estimate from the School District describing

24 the nature and cost of the work to be performed, and the

25 Coast Guard shall transfer only that amount of funds it
3

•HR 5637 CPH

1 and the School District consider necessary to complete the

2 project.

Æ
#### § 952.30 Supplemental orders.

When the Chief Postal Inspector or his or her designee, or the Chief Postal Inspector's designated representative shall have reason to believe that a person is evading or attempting to evade the provisions of any such orders by conducting the same or a similar enterprise under a different name or at a different address, he or she may file a petition with accompanying evidence setting forth the alleged evasion or attempted evasion and requesting the issuance of a supplemental order or orders against the name or names allegedly used. Notice shall then be given by the Recorder to the person that the order has been requested and that an answer may be filed within 10 days of the notice. The Judicial Officer, for good cause shown, may hold a hearing to consider the issues in controversy, and shall, in any event, render a final decision granting or denying the supplemental order or orders.
Exhibit 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-85292 and 333-90846) of ITS Networks, Inc.
of  our report dated December 20, 2002, relating to the financial statements and
financial  statement  schedule,  which  appear  in  this  Form  10-KSB.

January  14,  2003                         Gray  &  Northcutt,  PLLC

                                           By:/s/  Charles  Gray
#### § 102-34.270 How long must we keep a Government-owned motor vehicle?

You must keep a Government-owned motor vehicle for at least the years or miles shown in the following table, unless it is no longer needed and declared excess:

Table of Minimum Replacement Standards

| Motor vehicle type | Years1 | Or miles1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sedans/Station Wagons | 3 | 60,000 |
| Ambulances | 7 | 60,000 |
| Buses: | | |
| Intercity | n/a | 280,000 |
| City | n/a | 150,000 |
| School | n/a | 80,000 |
| Trucks: | | |
| Less than 12,500 pounds GVWR | 6 | 50,000 |
| 12,500-23,999 pounds GVWR | 7 | 60,000 |
| 24,000 pounds GVWR and over | 9 | 80,000 |
| 4- or 6-wheel drive motor vehicles | 6 | 40,000 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Minimum standards are stated in both years and miles; use whichever occurs first. | | |
§ 102-37.135 How does a SASP become eligible to distribute surplus property to donees? In order to receive transfers of surplus property, a SASP must: ( a ) Have a GSA-approved State plan of operation; and
( b ) Provide the certifications and agreements as set forth in §§ 102-37.200 and 102-37.205.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5335

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require candidates

for election for Federal office to raise the majority of their contributions

from individuals who reside in the State the candidate seeks to represent,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 2000

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Administration

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

require candidates for election for Federal office to raise

the majority of their contributions from individuals who

reside in the State the candidate seeks to represent,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5335 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIRING MAJORITY OF CANDIDATE FUNDS

2 TO COME FROM INDIVIDUALS RESIDING IN

3 STATE INVOLVED.

4 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

5 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

6 the following new subsection:

7 ‘‘(i)(1) With respect to each reporting period for an

8 election, the total of contributions accepted by a candidate

9 for the office of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate

10 or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress from in-State

11 individual residents shall be at least 50 percent of the total

12 of contributions accepted from all sources.

13 ‘‘(2) As used in this subsection, the term ‘in-State

14 individual resident’ means an individual who resides in the

15 State in which the Senate seat or congressional district

16 involved (as the case may be) is located.’’.

17 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING BUNDLING OF CONTRIBUTIONS.

18 Section 315(a)(8) of the Federal Election Campaign

19 Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(8)) is amended to read

20 as follows:

21 ‘‘(8) No person may make a contribution through an

22 intermediary or conduit, except that a person may facili23 tate a contribution by providing—

24 ‘‘(A) advice to another person as to how the

25 other person may make a contribution; and
3

•HR 5335 IH

1 ‘‘(B) addressed mailing material or similar

2 items to another person for use by the other person

3 in making a contribution.’’.

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

5 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

6 respect to elections occurring after December 31, 2000.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc. (the“registrant”) for the year ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Todd Parker, Co-Chief Executive Officer andCo-Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:(1) The report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theregistrant.Date:June 20, 2006     By:  /S/ Todd Parker    Todd Parker    Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chief Financial Officer   This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the registrantfor purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrantspecifically incorporates it by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15265]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-1237, MM Docket No. 00-104, RM-9812]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Oklahoma City, OK

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Paramount Stations Group of Oklahoma LLC, licensee of station KAUT-TV, 
NTSC Channel 43, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, requesting the substitution 
of DTV Channel 40 for its assigned DTV 42. DTV Channel 40 can be 
allotted to Oklahoma City in compliance with the principle community 
coverage requirements of Section 73.625(a) at coordinates 35-35-22 N. 
and 97-29-03 W. DTV Channel 40 can be allotted to Oklahoma City with a 
power of 57.7 kW and a height above average terrain (HAAT) of 475 
meters.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before July 31, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before August 15, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 
TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the 
FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner, or its counsel or 
consultant, as follows: James R. Bayes, E. Joseph Knoll III, Wiley, 
Rein & Fielding, 1776 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006 (Counsel for 
Paramount Stations Group of Oklahoma City LLC).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-104, adopted June 7, 
2000, and released June 8, 2000. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-15265 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No.: 0:22-cv-61651-AHS 

GRACE FLANNERY, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., 

Defendant. 

___________________________________/ 

MEDIATOR’S REPORT 

The undersigned Mediator hereby reports to the Court the disposition of the 

mediation held on 2/16/24 of the above captioned action: 

The mediation ended in an impasse. 

Tina Scott Polsky, Esq.

North Castle Mediation

tinapolsky@nocastle.com

www.northcastlemediation.com

Office: (561) 962-4400, Ext. 706

Fax: (561) 962-4401

Cell: (561) 302-9693

 

By:_______/tsp/________________ 

 Tina Scott Polsky, Mediator 

Dated: 2-16-24 

Copies to: 

Monique Olivier, Esq. 

Miguel Morel, Esq. 

Case 0:22-cv-61651-AHS Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/16/2024 Page 1 of 1