35692 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 121 / Tuesday, June 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

10. Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under Executive Order 

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have determined that this action is one 

of a category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves 

establishment of a temporary safety 

zone. This rule may be categorically 

excluded from further review under 

paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the 

Commandant Instruction. An 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination and a 

Categorical Exclusion Determination are 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, and 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMMITED ACCESS 

AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T01–0117 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T01–0117 Safety Zone; Lady Liberty 

Sharkfest Swim; Upper New York Bay, 

Liberty Island, NY. 

(a) Regulated Area. The following area 

is a temporary safety zone: All navigable 

waters of the Upper New York Bay 

bound by a line drawn from position 

40°42′44.82′′ N, 074°02′18.03′′ W, east to 

position 40°42′28.86′′ N, 074°01′30.22′′ 

W, south to position 40°42′12.24′′ N, 

074°02′18.22′′ W, west to position 

40°41′35.38′′ N, 074°03′12.61′′ W, then 

north along the shoreline back to the 

point of origin. 

(b) Enforcement Period. This rule will 

be enforced from approximately 7:00 

a.m. to 10:00 a.m. on June 29, 2014. 

(c) Definitions. The following 

definitions apply to this section: 

(1) Designated Representative. A 

‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast 

Guard commissioned, warrant or petty 

officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has 

been designated by the Captain of the 

Port (COTP) New York, to act on his or 

her behalf. A designated representative 

may be on an official patrol vessel or 

may be on shore and will communicate 

with vessels via VHF–FM radio or 

loudhailer. In addition, members of the 

Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to 

inform vessel operators of this 

regulation. 

(2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official 

patrol vessels may consist of any Coast 

Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or 

local law enforcement vessels assigned 

or approved by the COTP. 

(d) Regulations. 

(1) The general regulations contained 

in 33 CFR 165.23, as well as the 

following regulations, apply. 

(2) No vessels, except for support 

vessels provided by the event sponsor, 

will be allowed to transit the safety zone 

without the permission of the COTP. 

(3) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

COTP or a designated representative. 

Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast 

Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing 

light or other means, the operator of a 

vessel shall proceed as directed. 

(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the safety zone shall 

contact the COTP or a designated 

representative via VHF channel 16 or 

718–354–4353 (Sector New York 

command center) to obtain permission 

to do so. 

Dated: June 7, 2014. 

G. Loebl, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port New York. 

[FR Doc. 2014–14707 Filed 6–23–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Part 600 

RIN 1840–AD02 

Institutional Eligibility Under the 

Higher Education Act of 1965, as 

Amended; Delay of Implementation 

Date 

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary 

Education, Department of Education. 

ACTION: Final regulations; delay of 

implementation date. 

SUMMARY: The Department further 

delays, until July 1, 2015, the 

implementation date for certain State 

authorization regulations for institutions 

of postsecondary education whose State 

authorization does not meet the 

requirements of these regulations, so 

long as the State is establishing an 

acceptable authorization process that is 

to take effect by the delayed 

implementation date. 

DATES: The implementation date is 

delayed to July 1, 2015, as discussed in 

the Supplementary Information section 

of this document. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sophia McArdle, U.S. Department of 

Education, 1990 K Street NW., Room 

8019, Washington, DC 20006–8542. 

Telephone: (202) 219–7078 or by email 

at: Sophia.McArdle@ed.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department further delays, until July 1, 

2015, the implementation date of the 

changes to 34 CFR 600.9(a) and (b) 

(State authorization regulations) 

published in the Federal Register on 

October 29, 2010 (75 FR 66832) for 

institutions of postsecondary education 

whose State authorization does not meet 

the requirements of these regulations by 

July 1, 2014, so long as the State is 

establishing an acceptable authorization 

process that is to take effect by the 

delayed implementation date. On May 

21, 2013, the Department delayed this 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 121 / Tuesday, June 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 35693 

date from July 1, 2013, to July 1, 2014 

(78 FR 29652). The Department provides 

this further extension for institutions in 

order to provide States with additional 

time to finalize processes for those 

institutions to be able to comply with 

the State authorization provisions in 

§ 600.9(a) and (b). Those provisions 

apply to an institution separately with 

respect to each State in which the 

institution has a main or additional 

location offering at least 50 percent of 

an eligible educational program. 

In order for an institution that cannot 

meet the State authorization 

requirements to receive an extension 

until July 1, 2015, to implement 

§ 600.9(a) and (b), the institution must 

obtain from the State an explanation, 

such as information on timeline and 

action steps to ensure compliance, of 

how an additional one-year extension 

will permit the State to finalize its 

procedures so that the institution is in 

compliance with amended § 600.9. The 

explanation must be provided to 

Department staff upon request. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc) on 

request to the program contact person 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the 

official edition of the Federal Register 

and the Code of Federal Regulations is 

available via the Federal Digital System 

at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you 

can view this document, as well as all 

other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF). To use PDF you must 

have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at this site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature of this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 600 

Colleges and universities, Foreign 

relations, Grant programs—education, 

Loan programs—education, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements, 

Student aid, Vocational education. 

Dated: June 19, 2014. 

Lynn B. Mahaffie, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary 

Education. 

[FR Doc. 2014–14721 Filed 6–23–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2014–0018, FRL–9912–55- 

Region 10] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Oregon: 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving the portion 

of the December 27, 2013, State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal 

from Oregon relating to the 

infrastructure requirements of the Clean 

Air Act (CAA) for the National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) 

promulgated for lead (Pb) on October 

15, 2008. The CAA requires that each 

state, after a new or revised NAAQS is 

promulgated, review their SIP to ensure 

that it meets the infrastructure 

requirements necessary to implement 

the new or revised NAAQS. The EPA 

finds that the Oregon SIP meets the 

CAA infrastructure requirements for the 

2008 Pb NAAQS. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on July 

24, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R10–OAR– 

2014–0018. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the http://

www.regulations.gov Web site. Although 

listed in the index, some information 

may not be publicly available, i.e., 

Confidential Business Information or 

other information the disclosure of 

which is restricted by statute. Certain 

other material, such as copyrighted 

material, is not placed on the Internet 

and will be publicly available only in 

hard copy form. Publicly available 

docket materials are available either 

electronically through http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste, 

and Toxics, AWT–107, 1200 Sixth 

Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The 

EPA requests that you contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristin Hall at: (206) 553–6357, 

hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA, 

Region 10 address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document wherever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is 

intended to refer to the EPA. 

Information is organized as follows: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. Final Action 

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background 

Section 110 of the CAA specifies the 

general requirements for states to submit 

SIPs to implement, maintain, and 

enforce the NAAQS and the EPA’s 

actions regarding approval of those SIPs. 

On December 27, 2013, Oregon 

submitted a SIP revision to the EPA 

demonstrating that the SIP meets the 

infrastructure requirements of the CAA 

for the 2008 Pb NAAQS, 2010 nitrogen 

dioxide NAAQS, and 2010 sulfur 

dioxide NAAQS. On April 17, 2014, we 

proposed approval of the portion of 

Oregon’s December 27, 2013, submittal 

relating to the 2008 Pb NAAQS (79 FR 

21679). An explanation of the CAA 

requirements and implementing 

regulations that are met by this SIP 

revision, a detailed explanation of the 

revision, and the EPA’s reasons for the 

proposed action were provided in the 

notice of proposed rulemaking on April 

17, 2014, and will not be restated here. 

We note that we intend to address the 

remainder of the December 27, 2013, 

submittal, relating to the infrastructure 

requirements of the 2010 nitrogen 

dioxide NAAQS and 2010 sulfur 

dioxide NAAQS, in a separate action (79 

FR 21679). The public comment period 

for our proposed action ended on May 

19, 2014, and we received no comments. 

II. Final Action 

The EPA is approving the portion of 

the December 27, 2013, submittal from 

Oregon relating to the infrastructure 

requirements of the 2008 Pb NAAQS. 

Specifically, we are approving the 

submitted revision to OAR 340–202– 

0130 ‘‘Ambient Air Quality Standard for 

Lead’’ and the addition of OAR 340– 

202–0020 ‘‘Applicability.’’ We find that 

the Oregon SIP meets the following 

CAA section 110(a)(2) infrastructure 

elements for the 2008 Pb NAAQS: (A), 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES