alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 5, 2022

.

________________ No. 3D22

- 1330 Lower Tribunal No. F21

- 16226

________________



### Ricky Willis , Petitioner,

vs.


### Cassandra Jones, etc., et al. , Respondent s

.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction

– Habeas Corpus

. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender , for petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Att orney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent The State of Florida

.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM

. Ricky Willis petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial2 court ordered him held without bond on the charges of murder in the second

degree and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon despite finding after

an Arthur 1 hearing that proof was not evident nor presumption great

. We

grant the petition for writ o f habeas corpus and direct the trial court to conduct

a rule 3.131 pretrial release hearing. See Joseph v. Junior , 319 So. 3d 766,

767 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021); Ginsb e rg v. Ryan , 60 So. 3d 475, 477 (Fla. 3d DCA

2011). This decision is without prejudice for the State to file a legally

sufficient motion for pretrial detention, should it choose to do so. See

Joseph , 319 So. 3d at 767; Ho v. State , 929 So. 2d 1155 , 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA

2006). The trial court is directed to hold the hearing no later than three

business days following the issuance of this opinion. See id

. Petition granted; cause remanded.

1 State v . Arthur , 390 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1980).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15313]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #3327]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Subcommittee on Safety of Life 
at Sea; Working Group on Safety of Navigation; Notice of Meeting

    The Working Group on Safety of Navigation of the Subcommittee on 
Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) will conduct an open meeting at 9:30 AM 
on Thursday, June 22, 2000, in room 6103, U. S. Coast Guard 
Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, S.W., Washington, DC.
    The purpose of the meeting is to prepare for the 46th session of 
the Subcommittee on Safety of Navigation (NAV) of the International 
Maritime Organization (IMO) which is scheduled for July 10-14, 2000, at 
the IMO Headquarters in London.
    Items of principal interest on the agenda are:
--Routing of ships, ship reporting and related matters
--Amendments to the International Regulations for Prevention of 
Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS)
--Integrated bridge systems (IBS) operational aspects
--Guidelines on ergonomic criteria for bridge equipment and layout
--Navigational aids and related matters
--International Telecommunication Union (ITU) matters, including 
Radiocommunication ITU-R Study Group 8
--IMO Standard Marine Communication Phrases
--Guidelines relating to SOLAS chapter V
--Comprehensive review of chapter 13 of the High Speed Craft (HSC) Code
--Development of guidelines for ships operating in ice-covered waters
    Members of the public may attend these meetings up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing: Mr. Edward J. LaRue, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard (G-MWV-3), Room 
1407, 2100 Second Street SW, Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling: 
(202) 267-0416.

    Dated: June 9, 2000.
Stephen M. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 00-15313 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-U
----

|                                                                            |   | THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED      |    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|---------|
|                                                                            |   | August 30,      2008 |    |   | September       1,2007 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |   |   |
| Net      income (loss) for computing income (loss) per common share             |   | $                         | (2,659  | ) |   | $ | 48,828 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number of common shares outstanding during each    period |   |                      | 781,779 |   |   |   | 785,416 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                            |   |                      |    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      income (loss) per common share                                         |   | $                         | (0.003  | ) |   | $ | 0.062 |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

                  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTREACTED FROM THE SUNBEAM COPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIODS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         51,057
<SECURITIES>                                   71,764
<RECEIVABLES>                                  487,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                   43,685
<INVENTORY>                                    503,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,141,382
<PP&E>                                         569,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (117,572)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,404,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,063,556
<BONDS>                                        807,288
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,007
<OTHER-SE>                                     141,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,404,214
<SALES>                                        1,184,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               891,412
<CGS>                                          891,412
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  294,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,322)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               86,950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (90,220)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,008
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (107,685)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.07)


</TABLE>
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Yaser Martinez) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Yaser Martinez.

Dated this 22nd day of August 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 193 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2023 Page 1 of 1
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5478

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 25 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Received

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire by

donation suitable land to serve as the new location for

the home of Alexander Hamilton, commonly known as

the Hamilton Grange, and to authorize the relocation

of the Hamilton Grange to the acquired land.
2

HR 5478 RDS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELOCATION AND PRESERVATION OF THE

4 HAMILTON GRANGE IN NEW YORK CITY.

5 Section 2 of Public Law 87–438, as amended by Pub6 lic Law 100–701; 102 Stat. 4640; 16 U.S.C. 431 note)

7 is amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before

9 ‘‘The Secretary of the Interior’’; and

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 section:

12 ‘‘(b) RELOCATION OF HAMILTON GRANGE.—The

13 Secretary is authorized to acquire by donation from the

14 City of New York, New York, a parcel of land or suitable

15 interests in such land, not to exceed one acre, to serve

16 as the new location for the home of Alexander Hamilton,

17 commonly known as the Hamilton Grange, and to relocate

18 the Hamilton Grange to such land. The acquired land or

19 interests in land shall be in close proximity to the original

20 location of Hamilton Grange and shall be added to and

21 administered as part of the memorial.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 24,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC
                           NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

                                   EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED      TWENTY-SIX WEEK ENDED
                                                December 2,  November 27,  December 2,  November 27,
                                                   2000          1999          2000        1999
                                                ----------   -----------    ----------   ---------
<S>                                             <C>          <C>            <C>          <C>
Net income (loss) for computing income (loss)
  per common share                              $   15,807   $   (15,462)   $   19,007   $ (37,801)
                                                ==========   ===========    ==========   =========



Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding during each period                   831,530       842,467       834,641     840,892
                                                ==========   ===========    ==========   =========



Net income(loss) per common share               $    0.019   $    (0.018)   $    0.023   $  (0.045)
                                                ==========   ===========    ==========   =========
</TABLE>
§ 102-33.155 How must we establish Flight Program Standards? To establish Flight Program Standards, you must write, publish (as appropriate), implement, and comply with standards (specific to your agency), which establish or require (contractually, where applicable) policies and procedures for— ( a ) Management/administration of your flight program (in this part, “flight program” includes CAS contracts);
( b ) Operation of your flight program;
( c ) Maintenance of your Government aircraft;
( d ) Training for your flight program personnel;
( e ) Safety of your flight program;
( f ) Accident reporting and investigation as appropriate; and
( g ) Reporting to FAIRS as required by this part.
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2003 Page 1 of 1
<Page>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY




       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Donald E. Steen, Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik and each of
them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his
behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United
Surgical Partners International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite
and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents
and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.






                                            /s/ John C. Garrett, M.D.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John C. Garrett, M.D.
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2000 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION

I, Gerard M. Werner, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of North Shore Capital IV,
      Inc., (the "registrant");

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
             disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
             supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
             registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
             to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
             period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
             and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
             the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
             the end of the period covered by this report based on such
             evaluation; and

      (c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
             control over financial reporting that occurred during the
             registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
             fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
             affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
             registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
      of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      (a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
             or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
             reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
             record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
             other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
             internal control over financial reporting.

October 3, 2005


/s/  Gerard M. Werner
Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

DEVIN FILIPPELLI

PLAINTIFF(S) 

v.

SEAN MICHAEL HARDER, et al.,

DEFENDANT(S). 

CASE NUMBER

 9:22−cv−81731−DMM

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

Clerk's Default

 It appearing that the defendant(s) herein, is/are in default for failure to appear, answer, or otherwise plead

to the complaint filed herein within the time required by law.

Default is hereby entered against defendant(s)

GROW LLC

SEAN MICHAEL HARDER

as of course, on the date March 24, 2023.

Angela E. Noble

CLERK OF COURT

By /s/ Dimas Rodriguez

Deputy Clerk

cc: Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks

 Sean Michael Harder

 1061 N Cliff Creek Ave

 Meridean, ID

83642

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

Case 9:22-cv-81731-DMM Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2023 Page 1 of 2
CV−37 (10/01)

Case 9:22-cv-81731-DMM Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
Director, Corporate Environmental

Arizona Public Service

P. 0. Box 53999Phoenix, Arizona 85072

Dear Ms. Kidd:Thank you for your interest in Arizona’s plan to address regional haze in protected national parks and

wilderness areas as required under the Clean Air Act (CAA). We are responding to your letter dated July

20, 2012, requesting an extension ofthe public comment period and additional hearings.We agree to extend the deadline for public comment and conduct two additional public hearings to

provide further opportunity for review and comment on the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART)

determinations for three power plants in Arizona (Apache Generating Station, Cholla Power Plant andCoronado Generating Station). We have extended the public comment period by two weeks, for a total

of 60 days ending on September 18, 2012, but are unable to provide the 90 days that you requested. Weare on an expedited schedule to review and respond to all public comments and to prepare a finaldetermination on these three BART determinations by the deadline ofNovember 15, 2012. Thisdeadline is mandated by a consent decree entered by the Federal District Court for the District ofColumbia, over Arizona’s objection. We did request an extension ofthis deadline from the other parties

to that consent decree, but were unsuccessful.

On August 14, 2012, we will hold an additional hearing in Holbrook, Arizona at Holbrook High School,George Gardner Performing Arts Center, 4.5 N. 8th Ave.) from 6-8 PM. Note this is a change from theoriginal location at Northland Pioneer College. On August 15, 2012, we will hold a hearing in Benson,

Arizona, at Cochise College (Rooms 113 and 115) from 6-8 PM. These two hearings are in addition to

the public hearing held in Phoenix on July 31, 2012.

We look forward to receiving your comments on the proposed rulemaking and working with you andother interested parties to address regional haze affecting national parks and wilderness areas. If you

have further questions, please contact Colleen McKaughan, at 520-498-0118.

Sincerely,

r Debirdan

Dir€tor, Air Division

Printed on Recycled Paper
§ 102-37.40 What type of surplus property is available for donation? All surplus property (including property held by working capital funds established under 10 U.S.C. 2208 or in similar funds) is available for donation to eligible recipients, except for property in the following categories: ( a ) Agricultural commodities, food, and cotton or woolen goods determined from time to time by the Secretary of Agriculture to be commodities requiring special handling with respect to price support or stabilization.
( b ) Property acquired with trust funds (e.g., Social Security Trust Funds).
( c ) Non-appropriated fund property.
( d ) Naval vessels of the following categories: Battleships, cruisers, aircraft carriers, destroyers, and submarines.
( e ) Vessels of 1500 gross tons or more which the Maritime Administration determines to be merchant vessels or capable of conversion to merchant use.
( f ) Records of the Federal Government.
( g ) Property that requires reimbursement upon transfer (such as abandoned or other unclaimed property that is found on premises owned or leased by the Government).
( h ) Controlled substances.
( i ) Items as may be specified from time to time by the GSA Office of Governmentwide Policy.
§ 3030.265 Opportunity for comments. ( a ) Following the conclusion of the public hearings and submission of any supplementary materials, interested persons will be given the opportunity to submit written comments on: ( 1 ) The sufficiency of the justification for an exigent rate adjustment;
( 2 ) The adequacy of the justification for adjustments in the amounts requested by the Postal Service; and
( 3 ) Whether the specific rate adjustments requested are reasonable and equitable.
( b ) An opportunity to submit written reply comments will be given to the Postal Service and other interested persons.