alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(B) AND 15D-14(B)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 1, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Paul R. Cook
---------------------------
Paul R. Cook
Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  October 16, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-23362-CV-WILLIAMS

WEIZMAN FL PROPERTIES, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL MARANDA,

Defendant.

/

ORDER 

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s (together, the 

“Parties”) Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Final Judgment (“Joint Motion”) (DE 25).

The Court has carefully considered the Joint Motion and the consent final judgment

attached as Exhibit 1 to the Joint Motion (DE 25-1). Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED that:

1. The Joint Motion (DE 25) is GRANTED.

2. Final Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant. 

3. Defendant shall pay the principal sum of $518,865.23, plus reasonable 

attorneys’ fees incurred through March 31, 2023, in the amount of 

$42,106.77, and $1,376.75 in taxable costs, for a total sum of $562,348.75, 

which shall bear statutory interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 

4. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69, Defendant, under oath,

shall complete Florida Rule of Civil Procedure Form 1.977, including all 

required attachments, and serve it on Plaintiff’s counsel within 45 days 

from the date of this Order, unless the Judgment is satisfied or postCase 1:22-cv-23362-KMW Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2023 Page 1 of 2
judgment is stayed. 

5. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the sole purpose of 

enforcing the obligations under the consent final judgment. 

6. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida on this 28th day of July,

2023.

Case 1:22-cv-23362-KMW Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2023 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14****OF THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT**
     I, Craig T. Davenport, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Endocare, Inc.;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: March 15, 2004 /s/ Craig T. Davenport    Craig T. Davenport  Chief Executive Officer  (principal executive officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-CR-20521-RNS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. 

THEODORE FARNSWORTH and 

J. MITCHELL LOWE

 

Defendants. 

 / 

UNITED STATES’ SECOND RESPONSE TO

THE STANDING DISCOVERY ORDERS 

The United States hereby files this Second Response to the Standing Discovery Orders 

(ECF Nos. 8 and 9) as to Defendants Theodore Farnsworth and J. Michell Lowe (the “Defendants”)

and hereby notifies the Court that as of February 7, 2023, the following supplemental discovery 

has been produced to the Defendants: 

Description Beginning Bates Range Ending Bates Range

Bankruptcy Trustee’s

Documents

DOJ-PROD19-0000000001 DOJ-PROD19-0000000060

SEC Documents DOJ-PROD19-0000000061 DOJ-PROD19-0000000062

Agents’ Interview Reports, 

Notes, and Attachments

DOJ-PROD19-0000000063 DOJ-PROD19-0000001494

Subpoena Returns DOJ-PROD19-0000001495 DOJ-PROD19-0000001508

 In addition to the documents listed above, the government also produced native files to 

supplement the government’s first discovery production to ensure that the government’s past and

future productions are formatted consistently.

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2023 Page 1 of 3
2 

The United States recognizes that its obligation to provide discovery is of a continuing 

nature and will supplement this response if and when it obtains additional evidence and materials. 

Respectfully submitted,

 GLENN S. LEON

CHIEF, FRAUD SECTION

CRIMINAL DIVISION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

 

 By: /s/ Lauren Archer 

 Christopher Fenton 

 Lauren Archer

Trial Attorneys

 Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 (Archer) 

 United States Department of Justice

 Criminal Division, Fraud Section

 1400 New York Ave., NW 

 Washington, DC 20005 

 Tel: (202) 538-3859 

 Email: Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov 

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2023 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 7, 2023, the foregoing was filed and served on all counsel 

of record using the CM/ECF system.

 /s/ Lauren Archer 

 Lauren Archer

Trial Attorney

 Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 

 United States Department of Justice

Criminal Division, Fraud Section

 1400 New York Ave., NW 

 Washington, DC 20005 

 Tel: (202) 538-3859 

 Email: Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov 

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2023 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                            AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                          NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
                                                      ------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>          <C>
                                                       AUGUST 30,   AUGUST 31,
                                                          1997         1996
                                                      -----------  -----------
Net income for computing earnings per common share... $    27,349  $    53,601
                                                      -----------  -----------
                                                      -----------  -----------
Weighted average number of common shares 
  outstanding during each period.....................     921,507      924,653
                                                      -----------  -----------
                                                      -----------  -----------
Net income per common share..........................   $   0.030    $   0.058
                                                      -----------  -----------
                                                      -----------  -----------
</TABLE>
 
                                       (11)                PAGE 11 OF 11 PAGES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TULLIA HEISSENBERG, Individually,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 9:22-cv-81729-AMC

CELL NATION OF 3006 BROADWAY CORP.,

A New York corporation, et. al.

Defendants.

__________________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR MELBER, LLC

The law firm of Forster Boughman hereby files its Notice of Appearance as counsel for 

Defendant, MELBER, LLC., and hereby requests that all pleadings, motions, notices, orders and 

all other filings in this case be furnished to the undersigned as counsel for the Defendant. 

James E. Shepherd, Esq.

Forster Boughman

2200 Lucien Way, Suite 405

Maitland, Florida 32751

shepherd@forsterboughman.com

service@forsterboughman.com

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 12th day of December, 2022, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system and that a copy was sent via 

US Mail to: David C. Silver, Esq and Jason C. Miller, Esq, Silver Miller, 4450 NW 126th Ave –

Suite 101, Coral Springs, Fl 33085 Dsliver@silvermillerlaw.com and 

Jmiller@silvermillerlaw.com. 

/s/James E. Shepherd

James E. Shepherd, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0947873

Forster, Boughman

2200 Lucien Way, Suite 405

Maitland, Florida 32751

Telephone: 407-255-2055

Email Address: shepherd@forsterboughman.com

Secondary Email: service@forsterboughman.com

Counsel for Defendant, Melber, LLC.

Case 9:22-cv-81729-AMC Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 912.5 Administrative claim; when presented. ( a ) For purposes of this part, a claim shall be deemed to have been presented when the U.S. Postal Service receives from a claimant, his duly authorized agent or legal representative, an executed Standard Form 95, Claim for Damage or Injury, or other written notification of an incident, accompanied by a claim for money damages in a sum certain for injury to or loss of property, personal injury, or death alleged to have occurred by reason of the incident. A standard Form 95 may be obtained from the local District Tort Claims Coordinator, the National Tort Center, or online at usa.gov (select Government forms).
( b ) A claim presented in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section may be amended by the claimant at any time prior to: ( 1 ) The claimant's exercise of the option to file a civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2675(a);
( 2 ) The Postal Service's issuance of a payment in the full amount of the claim; or
( 3 ) The Postal Service's issuance of a written denial of the claim in accordance with § 912.9.
( c ) Amendments shall be submitted in writing and signed by the claimant or his duly authorized agent or legal representative. Upon the timely filing of an amendment to a pending claim, the Postal Service shall have six months in which to make final disposition of the claim as amended, and the claimant's option under 28 U.S.C. 2675(a) shall not accrue until six months after the filing of an amendment.
[36 FR 12448, June 30, 1971, as amended at 45 FR 43720, June 30, 1980; 69 FR 52607, Aug. 27, 2004; 73 FR 75339, Dec. 11, 2008]
#### § 102-35.5 What is the scope of the General Services Administration's regulations on the disposal of personal property?

The General Services Administration's personal property disposal regulations are contained in this part and in parts 102-36 through 102-42 of this subchapter B as well as in parts 101-42 and 101-45 of the Federal Property Management Regulations (FPMR)(41 CFR parts 101-42 and 101-45). With two exceptions, these regulations cover the disposal of personal property under the custody and control of executive agencies located in the United States, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau. The exceptions to this coverage are part 102-39 of this subchapter B, which applies to the replacement of all property owned by executive agencies worldwide using the exchange/sale authority, and §§ 102-36.380 through 102-36.400, which apply to the disposal of excess property located in countries and areas not listed in this subpart, i.e., foreign excess personal property. The legislative and judicial branches are encouraged to follow these provisions for property in their custody and control.
#### § 101-29.215 Departmental specification or standard.

A *departmental specification or standard* is a specification or standard prepared by, and of primary interest to, a particular Federal agency, but which may be used by other Federal agencies.
CNCS FY2018 Community Conversations Research Competition 

Frequently Asked Questions 

The categories in eGrants do not align with the categories listed in the Notice. How should we 

proceed when entering our application narrative? 

Please see our suggested guidance on how to align your narrative to the eGrants fields. Enter the narrative 

specified in the Notice into the following eGrants categories (see table below): 

- Project Information, Community Background, Research Objectives and Literature Review

into eGrants Research Objectives, Background and Conceptual Framework 

- Preliminary Research Design, Action Plans, Work Plan and Justification of Timeline, 

Community Involvement and Participatory Research Approach into eGrants Research Design and 

Work Plan 

- N/A into the Dissemination Plan subcategory 

- Oganizational Capability into eGrants Organizational Capability

- Cost effectiveness and Budget Adequacy into eGrants Cost Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy 

- Executive Summary into eGrants Executive Summary. 

Refer to the Notice section on page limits to ensure your application falls within this requirement (Notice, 

page 8) 

eGrant Application Content 

Research Objectives, Background, and Conceptual 

Framework

 Project Information

 Community Background

 Research Objectives and Literature Review

Research Design and Work Plan  Preliminary Research Design

 Action Plans, if applicable

 Work Plan and Justification of Timeline

 Community Involvement and Participatory 

Research Approach

Dissemination Plan N/A

Organizational Capability Organizational Capability

 Legal Applicant’s Ability to Manage Federal 

Funds and Work with Community Partners

 Program Director’s Ability to Deliver 

Proposed Activities

Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy

Executive Summary Executive Summary
#### CHRISTIAN G. VOLTZ, Respondent, *v.*ABEL T. BLACKMAR, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered at the Dutchess county Circuit, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff on a trial at the Dutchess Circuit in an action for false imprisonment, assault and battery, had a verdict for $4,250, and the court made an extra allowance of five per cent thereon in addition to the costs. The defendant seeks a new trial for alleged errors at the trial, and for excessive damages. The General Term found no errors that could be held at all sufficient to. disturb the verdict, nor, under the circumstances óf the case, did it consider the damages excessive. It further *held,*that the extra allowance was in accordance with the established practice and usage in the courts of the district.

*Lewis & Gurney,*for the appellant.

*Nichols & Allen,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Tappen, J.

Present— Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/16 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5644

To amend title 5, United States Code, to move the legal public holiday

known as Washington’s Birthday to election day in Presidential election

years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 7, 2000

Mr. UPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to move the legal

public holiday known as Washington’s Birthday to election day in Presidential election years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voting Opportunity

5 and Total Enfranchisement Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF WASHINGTON’S BIRTHDAY AS A

7 LEGAL PUBLIC HOLIDAY.

8 Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is

9 amended—
2

•HR 5644 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘the Tuesday next after the

2 first Monday in November in each fourth year after

3 2000, and’’ after ‘‘Washington’s Birthday,’’; and

4 (2) by inserting ‘‘in any other year’’ after ‘‘the

5 third Monday in February’’.

Æ
§ 102-36.120 What are our responsibilities in authorizing a non-federal individual to screen excess personal property? You must do the following: ( a ) Ensure that the non-federal screener certifies that any and all property requested will be used for authorized official purpose(s).
( b ) Maintain a record of the authorized screeners under your authority, to include names, addresses and telephone numbers, and any additional identifying information such as driver's license or social security numbers.
( c ) Retrieve any expired or invalid screener's authorization forms.
#### § 102-37.355 What obligations does a SASP have to ensure that donees meet Circular A-133 requirements?

SASPs, if they donate $500,000 or more in Federal property to a donee in a fiscal year, must ensure that the donee has an audit performed in accordance with Circular A-133. If a donee receives less than $500,000 in donated property, the SASP is not expected to assume responsibility for ensuring the donee meets audit requirements, beyond making sure the donee is aware that the requirements do exist. It is the donee's responsibility to identify and determine the amount of Federal assistance it has received and to arrange for audit coverage.

[67 FR 2584, Jan. 18, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 23868, Apr. 25, 2006]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,044,147
<SECURITIES>                                   160,194
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,747,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,155,973
<PP&E>                                       2,859,641
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,688,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,344,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,235,123
<BONDS>                                        400,109
<COMMON>                                        92,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,428,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,344,425
<SALES>                                      6,710,275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,710,275
<CGS>                                        5,283,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,283,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,439,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,590)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,198)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,392)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,392)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.005)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15574]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Corrections


Solicitation for a Cooperative Agreement--Critical Issues in 
Managing Women Offenders

AGENCY: National Institute of Corrections, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Correction to solicitation due date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This announcement is to correct the due date in the above 
notice which was published on June 9, 2000 in the Federal Register on 
Page 36725 in the paragraph entitled: Deadline for Receipt of 
Applications. The correct due date is Monday, July 17, 2000.

    Dated: June 15, 2000.
Larry B. Solomon,
Deputy Director, National Institute of Corrections.
[FR Doc. 00-15574 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-36-M