alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court ofAppeals, First District 301 Fannin Street <H Houston, Texas 77002-2066 

# » mm 

# OFF^^SJSSJfesS
EOSE

CASE NO. 01-15-00372-CV LU SHANNON SORGMAN 5304-D SAINT GEORGES GREEN AUSTIN _: _: ~ VMM mm* U.S.POSTAGE» PITNEYBOWES

ZIP 77002 < 02 1KV * 0001372104 OCT 27 2015

RE T-U R N i TO SE'N DER j'ST^toSB&ts :'£JUDGMENT 

## Court ofgppeal* f trsstMxtxitt ofMtsm NO. 01-15-00372-CV LU SHANNON SORGMAN, Appellant V. JASON MUSICK AND STEVEN PRATER DBA CAPITAL CITY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, Appellees Appeal from the County Court at LawNo. 2 ofTravis County. (Tr. Ct. No. C-l-CV-15-002112). This is an appeal from thejudgment signedby the courtbelow on March 31, 2015. 

### Appellant, Lu Shannon Sorgman, did not timely file a brief. Afterbeing notifiedthatthis appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed for want ofprosecution. The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance. Judgment rendered October 27, 2015. Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.

### Opinion issued October27, 2015

In The 

## Courtofiippeate For The 

## Jftr^tBfetrtctoftEexaa
NO. 01-15-00372-CV 

### LU SHANNON SORGMAN, Appellant V. JASON MUSICK & STEVEN PRATER DBA CAPITAL CITYREAL 

### ESTATE INVESTMENT, Appellees
On Appealfrom the County Court at Law No. 2 Travis County, Texas Trial Court Case No. C-l-CV-15-002112
MEMORANDUM OPINION 

### Appellant, Lu Shannon Sorgman, has failed to timely file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to

### dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b) 

### (allowing involuntary dismissal ofcase). We dismiss the appeal for Want ofprosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM 

### Panel consists ofJustices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-CR-20521-DSL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

THEODORE FARNSWORTH and

J. MITCHELL LOWE

Defendants.

 /

UNITED STATES’ EIGHTH RESPONSE TO 

THE STANDING DISCOVERY ORDERS

The United States hereby files its eighth response to the Standing Discovery Orders (ECF 

Nos. 8 and 9) as to Defendants Theodore Farnsworth and J. Michell Lowe (the “Defendants”) and 

hereby notifies the Court and all interested parties that as of May 23, 2024, the following 

supplemental discovery has been produced to the Defendants: 

Description Beginning Bates Range Ending Bates Range Date 

Produced

Courtesy 

Reproduction of 

Government’s 

Production 24 dated 

July 21, 2023

DOJ-PROD24-0000000001 DOJ-PROD24-0000295869 5/23/24

Materials Produced 

in US v. Itum DOJ-PROD33-0000000001 DOJ-PROD33-0000000146 4/11/24

Interview Notes DOJ-PROD32-0000000001 DOJ-PROD32-0000000001 4/11/24

Courtesy 

Reproduction of 

Documents and 

Videos Described in 

the Indictment

DOJ-PROD31-0000000001 DOJ-PROD31-0000002048 1/26/24

IP Records DOJ-PROD30-0000000008 DOJ-PROD30-0000000025 9/5/23

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 136 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2024 Page 1 of 3
2

U.S. Probation 

Records DOJ-PROD30-0000000003 DOJ-PROD30-0000000007 9/5/23

IP Records DOJ-PROD30-0000000001 DOJ-PROD30-0000000002 9/5/23

Interview Report & 

Notes DOJ-PROD29-0000000031 DOJ-PROD29-0000000038 8/29/23

Public Source 

Materials DOJ-PROD29-0000000030 DOJ-PROD29-0000000030 8/29/23

U.S. Probation 

Records DOJ-PROD29-0000000022 DOJ-PROD29-0000000029 8/29/23

Bureau of Prisons 

Records DOJ-PROD29-0000000001 DOJ-PROD29-0000000021 8/29/23

The United States recognizes that its obligation to provide discovery is of a continuing 

nature and will supplement this response if and when it obtains additional evidence and materials. 

Respectfully submitted,

GLENN S. LEON

CHIEF, FRAUD SECTION

CRIMINAL DIVISION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

By: /s/ Lauren Archer 

Lauren Archer 

Christopher Fenton

Matthew Reilly

Trial Attorneys

Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 (Archer)

United States Department of Justice

Criminal Division, Fraud Section

1400 New York Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 538-3859

Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 136 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2024 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 23, 2024, the foregoing was filed and served on all counsel of 

record using the CM/ECF system.

/s/ Lauren Archer 

Lauren Archer

Trial Attorney

Florida Special Bar No. A5502575

United States Department of Justice

Criminal Division, Fraud Section

1400 New York Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20005

(202) 538-3859

Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 136 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/23/2024 Page 3 of 3
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 582

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for more equitable policies

relating to overtime pay for Federal employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mrs. MORELLA,

and Mr. HOYER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for more

equitable policies relating to overtime pay for Federal

employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employees

5 Overtime Pay Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. REVISED LIMITATION.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5542 of title 5, United

8 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘GS–10’’ each place

9 it appears and inserting ‘‘GS–15’’.
2

HR 582 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Paragraph (3)

2 of section 5542(a) of title 5, United States Code, is re3 pealed.

4 (2) Section 5545(c) of title 5, United States Code,

5 is amended by adding at the end (as a flush left sentence)

6 the following:

7 ‘‘For purposes of applying this subsection, the reference

8 in paragraph (1) to section 5542(a)(3) shall be considered

9 made to that provision, as last in effect before the date

10 of enactment of the Federal Employees Overtime Pay Act

11 of 1999.’’.

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall take effect at the start of the first full

14 pay period in the first calendar year beginning at least

15 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
Order entered March 31, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00894-CV

TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION, Appellant

V.

JOSEPH MCRAE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-04163

ORDER

Appellant’s March 30, 2015, motion to supplement its index of authorities to include 

Dallas County Hospital d/b/a Parkland Health and Hospital System v. Constantino, 2014 WL 

3850579 (Tex. App.—Dallas August 7, 2014, no pet.) is GRANTED.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5604 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5604

  To authorize funding for certain housing assistance to increase the 
                  availability of affordable housing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2000

 Ms. Lofgren introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize funding for certain housing assistance to increase the 
                  availability of affordable housing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Affordable Housing Assistance Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING SHELTER PLUS CARE THROUGH SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE.

    Section 463 of Public Law 100-77 (42 U.S.C. 11403h) is amended to 
read as follows:

``SEC. 463. FUNDING.

    ``(a) In General.--For fiscal year 2001 and fiscal years 
thereafter, assistance under this subtitle shall be funded only by 
using amounts appropriated for section 8 of the United States Housing 
Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f).
    ``(b) Authorization of Appropriations.--In addition to any amounts 
otherwise made available for assistance under section 8 of the United 
States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f), there is authorized to be 
appropriated $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2001 for providing assistance 
under this subtitle.''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR SECTION 8 VOUCHER 
              ASSISTANCE.

    In addition to any amounts otherwise made available for assistance 
under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 
1437f) (including any amounts appropriated for assistance under the 
shelter plus care program under subtitle F of Public Law 100-77 (42 
U.S.C. 11403 et seq.) and any amounts appropriated pursuant to section 
558 of the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 (Public 
Law 105-276; 112 Stat. 2614)), there is authorized to be appropriated 
$14,200,000,000 for fiscal year 2001 for incremental voucher assistance 
under such section 8.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK 
              GRANT ASSISTANCE.

    The last sentence of section 103 of the Housing and Community 
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5303) is amended to read as follows: 
``For purposes of assistance under section 106, there is authorized to 
be appropriated $5,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.''.
                                 <all>
```
{"agency":"CNCS","generated":"2019-07-10 14:27:04","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2019"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CNCS"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["18"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["15"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2019","quarter":"Q3"}
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

ThePartners 

Duke Realty Limited Partnership: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-108557-01, No. 333-120492-01, No. 333-136173-01 and No. 333-160952-01 on Form S-3 of Duke Realty Limited Partnership of our report datedMarch 2, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Duke Realty Limited Partnership and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in equityfor each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, the related financial statement schedule III, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Duke Realty Limited Partnership. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Indianapolis, Indiana 

March 2, 2010
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.712 Notice to subrecipients and beneficiaries. ( a ) If a primary recipient passes on Federal financial assistance from GSA to subrecipients, the primary recipient provides to subrecipients, written notice of their obligations under the Act and this regulation.
( b ) Each recipient makes necessary information about the Act and this regulation available to its beneficiaries to inform them about the protections against discrimination provided by the Act and this regulation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998 
<CASH>                                              51,911 
<SECURITIES>                                     1,034,421 
<RECEIVABLES>                                       65,311 
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0 
<INVENTORY>                                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,174,891 
<PP&E>                                             764,622 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      21,294 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,939,513 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,779,951 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                           155,596 
<OTHER-SE>                                               0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,939,513 
<SALES>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   175,630 
<CGS>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   679,577 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (503,947)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 214,505 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (503,947)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (503,947)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (503,947)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (503,947)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.032)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.032)
                                               


</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, on behalf of himself

and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________ /

ORDER OF RECUSAL

THE UNDERSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE, to whom the above-styled case has

been assigned, hereby recuses herself and refers the matter to the Clerk of Court for

reassignment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a).

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 16th day of November, 

2022.

LAUREN F. LOUIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

In accordance with the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, providing for

the random and equal allotment of cases, this cause will be reassigned to the calendar of

____________________________. Copies of this Order shall be served on all pending parties

of record. All documents for filing in this case shall carry the following case number and

designation: 22-cv-23753-MOORE/_________________.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT this ____ day of _______, 2022, Miami, Florida.

ANGELA E. NOBLE

Clerk of Court

By: ____________________

Deputy Clerk

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra

Becerra

16h Nov.

/s/Valerie Kemp

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 102-37.125 What are some donations that do not require GSA's approval? ( a ) Some donations of surplus property that do not require GSA's approval are: ( 1 ) Donations of condemned, obsolete, or other specified material by a military department or the Coast Guard to recipients eligible under 10 U.S.C. 2572, 10 U.S.C. 7306, 10 U.S.C. 7541, 10 U.S.C. 7545, and 14 U.S.C. 641a (see appendix A of this part for details). However, such property must first undergo excess Federal and surplus donation screening as required in this part and part 102-36 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Donations by holding agencies to public bodies under subpart H of this part;
( 3 ) Donations by the Small Business Administration (SBA) to small disadvantaged businesses under 13 CFR part 124 (although collaboration and agreement between the SBA, SASPs, and GSA is encouraged); and
( 4 ) Donations by holding agencies of law enforcement canines to their handlers under 40 U.S.C. 555.
( b ) You may also donate property directly to eligible non-Federal recipients under other circumstances if you have statutory authority to do so. All such donations must be included on your annual report to GSA under § 102-36.300 of this chapter.
[67 FR 2584, Jan. 18, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 23868, Apr. 25, 2006; 79 FR 64514, Oct. 30, 2014]
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Moon, * Willis and Elder Argued at Richmond, Virginia

JAMES A. ROBINSON OPINION BY v. Record No. 0861-97-2 JUDGE NORMAN K. MOON NOVEMBER 25, 1997 TREGO STONE CORPORATION and NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION Brian J. Cuscé for appellant. James G. Muncie, Jr. (Midkiff & Hiner, on brief), for appellees.

James A. Robinson suffered a compensable injury in 1989. The commission awarded him temporary total disability benefits in 1989 but suspended that award in 1991 because of his third-party recovery. In 1996, Robinson applied for a new offset calculation based on Code § 65.2-313. Code § 65.2-313 was enacted in 1994 and requires offset calculations and proportionate payments of litigation expenses incurred in obtaining a third-party award which suspends, in whole or in part, an employer's workers' compensation obligations. Robinson noted that absent such recalculation, he would not be entitled to additional payments of the employer's pro rata share of his litigation expenses until he has expended the entire third-party award. The commission found that the 1991 order was final and thus rejected his application.

* When the case was argued Judge Moon presided. Judge Fitzpatrick was elected Chief Judge effective November 19, 1997.- 2 - We agree with the commission and affirm. Modification of Final Orders If an application for review of a final order of the commission is not made within twenty days of the date of the order, the commission has no jurisdiction to review the matter unless the petitioning party alleges fraud or mistake in the procurement of the award. McCarthy Electric Company, Inc. v.

Foster , 17 Va. App. 344, 345, 437 S.E.2d 246, 247 (1993) (citing Code § 65.2-705(A)). Because Robinson failed to meet this time requirement and has not alleged fraud or mistake, the commission correctly found that it lacked authority to modify the 1991

order. Robinson contends that the legislature intended that Code § 65.2-313 be applied retroactively. We need not address that issue because even if the statute could be applied retroactively, it could not be used to modify the 1991 order because Robinson failed to allege fraud or mistake. See Buenson Division, Aeronca, Inc. v. McCauley , 221 Va. 430, 434 n.2, 270 S.E.2d 734, 736 n.2 (1980) (noting that a new statute with retroactive applicability cannot act to revive a "dead claim"); Dan River, Inc. v. Adkins , 3 Va. App. 320, 326, 349 S.E.2d 667, 670 (1986) (citing Buenson Division , 221 Va. at 434 n.2, 270 S.E.2d at 736 n.2). Robinson suggests that we avoid this rule by considering his request for a new offset calculation to constitute mere enforcement, rather than modification, of the 1991 order. He- 3 - further suggests that Code § 65.2-313 is procedural in nature, and thus the time limit imposed by the rule does not apply. No authority supports either suggested construction of the rule. Affirmed.
#### § 102-38.10 What is the governing authority for this part?

The authority for the regulations in this part governing the sale of Federal personal property is 40 U.S.C. 541 through 548, 571, 573 and 574.
§ 102-41.5 What does this part cover? ( a ) This part covers the disposition of seized, forfeited, voluntarily abandoned, and unclaimed personal property under the custody of any Federal agency located in the United States, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau. Disposition of such personal property located elsewhere must be in accordance with holding agency regulations. Please see § 102-36.380 of this subchapter B regarding the disposal of foreign excess. The General Services Administration (GSA) does not normally accept responsibility for disposal of property located outside the United States and its territories. Additional guidance on disposition of seized, forfeited, voluntarily abandoned, and unclaimed personal property that requires special handling (e.g., firearms, hazardous materials) is contained in part 101-42 of this title. Additional guidance on the disposition of firearms (as scrap only), distilled spirits, wine, beer, and drug paraphernalia is provided in subpart E of this part.
( b ) These regulations do not include disposal of seized, forfeited, voluntarily abandoned, and unclaimed personal property covered under authorities outside of the following statutes: ( 1 ) 40 U.S.C. 552, Abandoned or Unclaimed Property on Government Premises.
( 2 ) 40 U.S.C. 1306, Disposition of Abandoned or Forfeited Property.
( 3 ) 26 U.S.C. 5688, Forfeited Distilled Spirits, Wines, and Beer.
( 4 ) 26 U.S.C. 5872, Forfeited Firearms.
( 5 ) 21 U.S.C. 863, Drug Paraphernalia.