alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Norwegian Plow Company v. E. B. Mower et al.

Filed November 9, 1894.

No. 4817.

Review: Failure to File Briefs: Aeeiemance. Where a judgment conforms to the pleadings and evidence in the case, and no briefe are filed by either party in this court, the judgment will not be disturbed. *(Damon v. City of Omaha,*38 Neb., 583.)

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J.

*Hanoood, Ames & Kelly*and *E. F. Pettis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Eavis & Hibner, contra.*

Norval, C. J.

This was an action upon a promissory note executed and delivered by the defendants in error to the Norwegian Plow *660Company for the sum of $103.42 and interest thereon. The petition is in the ordinary form. The defendants filed separate answers, each admitting the execution and delivery of the note, and setting up the defense of payment. The defendant Steiner further answered that he signed the note as surety for his co-defendant, E. B. Mower. The plaintiff replied by a general denial. There was a verdict for the defendants upon which judgment was rendered.

Upon a somewhat careful consideration of the record we are satisfied that the verdict and judgment conform to the pleadings and evidence, and neither party having filed briefs in the case, on the authority of *Phenix Ins. Co. of Brooklyn v. Reams,*37 Neb., 423, and *Damon v. City of Omaha,*38 Neb., 583, the judgment is

Affirmed.
#### § 3023.12 Treatment as a complaint.

If the Commission receives a volume of rate or service inquiries on the same or similar issue such that there may be cause to warrant treatment as a complaint, it may appoint an investigator to review the matter under § 3022.21 of this chapter or appoint a Public Representative representing the interests of the general public to pursue the matter.

[85 FR 9656, Feb. 19, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET OF  SWEETWATER  INVESTING,  INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE
RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Allied Defense Group, Inc (Allied) on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned, John G. Meyer, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer and
Charles A. Hasper as Chief Financial Officer of Allied, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Allied. /s/ Charles A. Hasper
    
    /s/ John G. Meyer, Jr.Charles A. Hasper
    
    John G. Meyer, Jr.Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    
    Chief Executive Officer and PresidentApril 25, 2005
    
    April 25, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Allied
Defense Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Allied Defense Group, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit









Exhibit 10.2


SCHEDULE I
CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN PARTICIPANTS
SECTION 16 OFFICERS


	
		
	Benefit Level1 - 3

	Baxter, Warner L.
	Mark, Richard J.

	Diya, Fadi M.
	Moehn, Michael

	Lyons, Martin J.
	 

	Benefit Level - 2

	Amirthalingam, Bhavani
	 














































_______________________
1 Benefit Levels are defined as a payment amount equal to a cash severance multiple of base pay, target short-term incentive award, short-term incentive award in year of termination (prorated at target), the actuarial equivalent of the benefit under the qualified defined benefit retirement plan and any excess or supplemental retirement plan.
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Oceania III Condominium 

Association, Inc., Plaintiff,

v.

Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co. 

and Everest Indemnity Ins. Co., 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-23681-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations

The Court previously referred the Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines 

Insurance Company’s (“Westchester”) motion for attorneys’ fees and costs (Mot. 

ECF No. 35) to Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for a report and 

recommendations. (Order Ref. Mot., ECF No. 36.) On August 18, 2023, Judge 

Goodman issued a report, recommending that the Court grant Westchester’s 

motion in part, deny the motion in part, and award $3,921.25 in attorneys’ fees

and $402.00 in costs. (Rep. & Rec., ECF No. 44.) No party has filed objections to 

the report, and the time to do so has passed.

The Court has considered Judge Goodman’s report, the record, and the 

relevant legal authorities. The Court finds Judge Goodman’s report and 

recommendations cogent and compelling. The Court affirms and adopts Judge 

Goodman’s report and recommendations. (ECF No. 44.) The Court thus grants in 

part and denies in part Westchester’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF 

No. 35.) Accordingly, the Court enters final judgment in Westchester’s favor, in 

the total amount of $4,323.25 (comprised of $3,921.25 in attorneys’ fees and 

$402.00 in taxable costs), against the Plaintiff Oceania III Condominium 

Association, Inc.

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on September 12, 2023.

___________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:22-cv-23681-RNS Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-78.65 What are Federal agencies' historic preservation responsibilities when disposing of real property under their control? Federal agencies must— ( a ) To the extent practicable, establish and implement alternatives for historic properties, including adaptive use, that are not needed for current or projected agency purposes. Agencies are required to get the Secretary of the Interior's approval of the plans of transferees of surplus Federally-owned historic properties; and
( b ) Review all proposed excess actions to identify any properties listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register. Federal agencies must not perform disposal actions that could result in the alteration, destruction, or modification of an historic or cultural property until Federal agencies have consulted with the SHPO and the Advisory Council.
#### §§ 3045.7-3045.9 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
          
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                      OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1996   
<CASH>                                    4,229
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            18,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                880
<INVENTORY>                                  65
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         30,987
<PP&E>                                    8,207
<DEPRECIATION>                            5,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           36,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    19,358
<BONDS>                                   2,062
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  5,535
<OTHER-SE>                               10,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             36,990
<SALES>                                  22,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         22,394
<CGS>                                    19,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            19,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             487
<INCOME-TAX>                                197
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         288
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                288
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .20
        

</TABLE>
My name is Ryan Baker. I've come to tell you about why it's importantto me that the proposed rules be carried forward. Overthe last 3 years, I've spent hundreds of hours working on an important campaign to improve the health ofChicago. That campaign was the effortto stop the pollution from the Fisk and Crawford coal fired power plants. Recently, those efforts paid offand by the end ofthis year Chicago will be free of coal fired power plants. Winningthis campaign was not easy, but I can tell you without a shadow of doubt, that Chicagoans do not want coal. The biggest obstacle throughout the campaign was raising awareness. Once Chicagoans knew these plants were here, they almost unilaterally agreed they should not be. Yet, despite this, Chicago is under threat of having new coal fired power plants built. Through backroom deals, greedy energy companies are tryingto get huge amounts of Illinois taxpayer's money to build new coal plants. Itshould be a foregone conclusion that we're not interested in destroying our climate in exchange for writing a big check to afew greedy energy companies. Yet they hope to find us asleep atthe wheel, and it's onlythrough rules like this thatthey'll getthe message once and for all, that no, were not interested in what they're selling. These rules reflect values I know are common, and are a sensible reflection ofthe needs oftoday. They may not reflect the interests ofa handful ofcompanies who own some ofthe most harmful parts ofour infrastructure, butthat is irrelevant. There are many more companies, who if given an opportunitywill supply us with clean energy. All that is necessary is a level playing field which does not allow ourfuture to be stolen from us.



### f) 

# i\I.(\I\ \**~)** 

## \

- 

# l_)CtkeC 

# -::')L-Jc ..**>,~.,** '---- '-- 'r 

# JIJ !'\ ;, I

. I
#### § 102-74.340 Who is responsible for monitoring and controlling areas designated for smoking by an agency head and for identifying those areas with proper signage?

Agency heads are responsible for monitoring and controlling areas designated by them under § 102-74.320(d) for smoking and identifying these areas with proper signage. Suitable, uniform signs reading “Designated Smoking Area” must be furnished and installed by the occupant agency.

[73 FR 77518, Dec. 19, 2008]
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




By    /s/ William S. Ayer
     -------------------------------
William S. Ayer
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
May 11, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 11.1
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     HELPMATE ROBOTICS INC.
                                                                  CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER
                                                                          COMMON SHARE
                                                                  ----------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>            <C>
                                                                      YEAR           YEAR
                                                                      ENDED          ENDED
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE                                          12/31/96       12/31/95
                                                                  -------------  -------------
Historical
Net Loss........................................................  $  (5,057,858) $  (3,683,274)
Preferred Dividends.............................................        (57,147)      (790,866)
                                                                  -------------  -------------
Net Loss Applicable to Common Shareholders......................  $  (5,115,005) $  (4,474,140)
                                                                  -------------  -------------
                                                                  -------------  -------------
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding......................      5,844,084      1,585,249
Incremental Shares Issuable Pursuant to SAB Topic 4D............          3,697         38,553
                                                                  -------------  -------------
Total Shares....................................................      5,847,781      1,623,802
                                                                  -------------  -------------
                                                                  -------------  -------------
Historical Net Loss per Common Share............................  $       (0.88) $       (2.76)
                                                                  -------------  -------------
                                                                  -------------  -------------
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                            RELM Wireless Corporation


                                            /s/ William P. Kelly
                                            ----------------------------
                                            William P. Kelly
                                            Executive Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
May 4, 2005
§ 80.115 Portland Head, ME to Cape Ann, MA. ( a ) Except inside lines specifically described in this section, the 72 COLREGS shall apply on the harbors, bays, and inlets on the east coast of Maine, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts from Portland Head to Halibut Point at Cape Ann.
( b ) A line drawn from the southernmost tower on Gerrish Island charted in approximate position latitude 43°04.0′ N., longitude 70°41.2′ W. to Whaleback Light; thence to Jaffrey Point Light 2A; thence to the northeasternmost extremity of Frost Point.
( c ) A line drawn from the northernmost extremity of Farm Point to Annisquam Harbor Light.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7786, Mar. 6, 1986; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39171, July 1, 2013]
#### § 102-37.85 Can surplus property being offered for sale be withdrawn and approved for donation?

Yes, surplus property being offered for sale may be withdrawn for donation if approved by GSA. GSA will not approve requests for the withdrawal of property that has been advertised or listed on a sales offering if that withdrawal would be harmful to the overall outcome of the sale. GSA will only grant such requests prior to sales award, since an award is binding.
Order entered December 14, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00467-CR

JULIO CESAR SOTO-GALVAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 32930CR

ORDER

We abated this appeal for the trial court to appoint new counsel for 

appellant. The trial court has appointed counsel, and counsel for appellant has 

filed appellant’s brief. We REINSTATE this appeal. 

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5505 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5505

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
    the value of diplomas, medals, and amounts received as part of 
 international awards recognizing individual achievement for physics, 
         chemistry, medicine, literature, economics, and peace.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 2000

  Mr. Hyde (for himself and Mrs. Maloney of New York) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
    the value of diplomas, medals, and amounts received as part of 
 international awards recognizing individual achievement for physics, 
         chemistry, medicine, literature, economics, and peace.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF INTERNATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FROM GROSS 
              INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 74 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to prizes and awards) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(d) Exception for International Achievement Awards.--Gross income 
does not include the value of any diploma, medal, or amount received as 
an international award for individual achievement in physics, 
chemistry, medicine, literature, economics, or peace.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to prizes and awards after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sonoran Energy, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ending April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Rosenthal, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/Peter Rosenthal

Peter Rosenthal

President



August 13, 2008
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5413

To require the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations addressing

safety concerns in minimizing delay for automobile traffic at railroad

grade crossings.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 2000

Mr. DINGELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations addressing safety concerns in minimizing delay for

automobile traffic at railroad grade crossings.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REGULATIONS.

4 Not later than one year after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall

6 issue regulations to address safety concerns and to mini7 mize delay for automobile traffic on our Nation’s roads
2

•HR 5413 IH

1 with respect to trains blocking traffic at railroad grade

2 crossings.

Æ