alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allied Research Corporation
("Allied") on Form 10-Q of the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, the
undersigned, J. H. Binford Peay, III as President and Charles A. Hasper as Chief
Financial Officer of Allied, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the consolidated financial condition and result of
          operations of Allied.

/s/ Charles A. Hasper                   /s/ J. H. Binford Peay, III
-------------------------               ---------------------------
Charles A. Hasper                       J. H. Binford Peay, III
Chief Financial Officer                 President
November 14, 2002                       November 14, 2002
§ 101-27.303-2 Redistribution. If the long supply of an item remains greater than 10 percent of the total stock of an item despite efforts to cancel or transfer the long supply as provided in § 101-27.303-1, the inventory manager shall offer the long supply to another agency or other agencies in accordance with this § 101-27.303-2. Before offering a long supply to any agency, the inventory manager shall determine whether the item to be offered is a centrally managed item or an agency managed item. A centrally managed item is an item of supply or equipment which forms part of an inventory of an agency performing a mission of storage and distribution to other Government activities; e.g., GSA and DSA. An agency managed item is a procured item that forms a part of a controlled inventory of an agency and its activities for issue internally for its own use. After determining whether the item to be offered is an agency or centrally managed item, the inventory manager shall: ( a ) Offer centrally managed items to the agency managing the item for return and credit in accordance with the procedures established by that agency; and
( b ) Offer agency managed items to other agencies which manage the same item. Reimbursement shall be arranged by the agencies effecting the inventory transfer. The responsibility of locating agencies or activities requiring these items shall rest with the agency holding the long supply. However, agencies may receive a list of Government activities using particular national stock numbers by writing to the General Services Administration (FFL), Washington, DC 20406.
[32 FR 13456, Sept. 26, 1967, as amended at 41 FR 3858, Jan. 27, 1976]
Utah Energy Code, 2000 International Energy 

Conservation Code, is available at: 

http://www.energycodes.gov/states/
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT
32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Christopher S. Forno, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                          |                          | 
|------------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|/s/
 Christopher S. Forno |                         
|                          |                         
|Name:                     | Christopher
 S. Forno   
|Title:                    | Chief
 Executive Officer
|Date:                     | August 12,
 2009        

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 102-117.390 What are the recommended Transportation Officer training and/or experience levels? The following are recommended agency transportation officer training and/or experience baselines: ( a ) For a Basic (Level 1) Transportation Officer Warrant: ( 1 ) Twenty-four (24) hours of training in Federal transportation; or
( 2 ) Two (2) years of Federal, public, and/or commercial experience in acquiring transportation through rate tenders.
( b ) For an Experienced (Level 2) Transportation Officer Warrant: ( 1 ) Thirty-two (32) hours of training in transportation, including twenty (20) hours of training in Federal transportation; or
( 2 ) Three
( 3 ) years of Federal, public, and/or commercial experience in acquiring transportation through rate tenders.
( c ) For a Senior (Level 3) Transportation Officer Warrant: ( 1 ) Sixty (60) hours of training in transportation, including forty (40) hours of training in Federal transportation; or
( 2 ) Five (5) years of Federal, public, and/or commercial experience in acquiring transportation through rate tenders.
[87 FR 32324, May 31, 2022]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1251 

CA 12-00631 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

DANIEL MANCUSO, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

ROSE M. KIJ, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KALEIDA HEALTH, DOING BUSINESS AS MILLARD 

FILLMORE GATES HOSPITAL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS,

AND TWIN CITY AMBULANCE CORPORATION, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

MACDONALD & HAFNER, ESQS., BUFFALO (PHYLISS A. HAFNER OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

BROWN CHIARI LLP, LANCASTER (DAVID W. OLSON OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M.

Siwek, J.), entered July 13, 2011. The order, insofar as appealed

from, denied that part of the motion of defendant Twin City Ambulance

Corporation seeking dismissal of plaintiff’s seventh cause of action. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action against numerous

defendants alleging, inter alia, that their negligence caused the

wrongful death of Rose M. Kij (decedent). In addition, plaintiff

alleged in the seventh cause of action that Twin City Ambulance

Corporation (defendant) “was negligent in the medical transportation

services that it provided to [decedent].” Defendant moved pursuant to

CPLR 3211 and 3212 for an order dismissing the amended complaint

against it based upon the statute of limitations and plaintiff’s

failure to attach a certificate of merit to the amended complaint

(see CPLR 3012-a). Supreme Court granted that part of the motion

seeking dismissal of the claim for wrongful death against defendant in

the fourth cause of action, but it denied that part of the motion

seeking dismissal of the seventh cause of action, concluding that such

cause of action sounded in ordinary negligence. We now affirm.

Plaintiff’s sole basis for liability against defendant in the

seventh cause of action is that defendant failed to deliver to the

hospital a medication list that was prepared by a member of decedent’s

family and given to defendant’s employees by that family member. 

While we agree with defendant that a mistake in taking a patient’s
-2- 1251 

CA 12-00631 

medical history is a claim that sounds in medical malpractice (see

generally Bleiler v Bodnar, 65 NY2d 65, 72), the claim here concerns

the “failure to communicate significant medical findings to a . . .

treating physician,” and that claim sounds in ordinary negligence

(Mosezhnik v Berenstein, 33 AD3d 895, 898; see Glasheen v Long Is.

Diagnostic Imaging, 306 AD2d 515, 515, lv denied 3 NY3d 612; Yaniv v

Taub, 256 AD2d 273, 274). Because the seventh cause of action sounds

in ordinary negligence, it is governed by the three-year statute of

limitations found in CPLR 214 and is thus timely. Furthermore, “[i]n

ordinary negligence, a medical affidavit setting out merit is

unnecessary” (Matter of Caracci v State of New York, 178 AD2d 876,

877; see generally CPLR 3012-a).

Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### § 102-38.225 What are the additional requirements in the bid process?

All sales except fixed price sales must contain a certification of independent price determination. If there is suspicion of false certification or an indication of collusion, you must refer the matter to the Department of Justice or your agency's Office of the Inspector General.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 621

To provide that certain regulations proposed by the Comptroller of the Currency, the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation relating to practices of financial institutions shall

not take effect.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 1999

Mr. HILLEARY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To provide that certain regulations proposed by the Comptroller of the Currency, the Director of the Office of

Thrift Supervision, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Deposit Insurance

Corporation relating to practices of financial institutions

shall not take effect.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know Your Customer

5 Program Abolishment Act’’.
2

HR 621 IH

1 SEC. 2. ‘‘KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER’’ REGULATIONS RE2 SCINDED.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—None of the following proposed

4 regulations may be published in final form and, to the ex5 tent any such regulation has become effective before the

6 date of the date of the enactment of this Act, such regula7 tion shall cease to be effective as of such date:

8 (1) The regulation proposed by the Comptroller

9 of the Currency to amend part 21 of title 12 of the

10 Code of Federal Regulations, as published in the

11 Federal Register on December 7, 1998.

12 (2) The regulation proposed by the Director of

13 the Office of Thrift Supervision to amend part 563

14 of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as

15 published in the Federal Register on December 7,

16 1998.

17 (3) The regulation proposed by the Board of

18 Governors of the Federal Reserve System to amend

19 parts 208, 211, and 225 of title 12 of the Code of

20 Federal Regulations, as published in the Federal

21 Register on December 7, 1998.

22 (4) The regulation proposed by the Federal De23 posit Insurance Corporation to amend part 326 of

24 title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as pub25 lished in the Federal Register on December 7, 1998.
3

HR 621 IH

1 (b) PROHIBITION ON SIMILAR REGULATIONS.—None

2 of the Federal banking agencies referred to in subsection

3 (a) may prescribe any regulation which is substantially

4 similar to, or would have substantially the same effect as,

5 any proposed regulation described in paragraph (1), (2),

6 (3), or (4) of subsection (a).

Æ
#### § 102-73.195 What types of special purpose space may the Department of Health and Human Services lease?

The Department of Health and Human Services is delegated authority to lease laboratories (lease terms, including all options, limited to 5 years).
§ 102-75.1195 What is the policy concerning making public the notice of determination? ( a ) No later than 15 days after the last-45 day period has elapsed for receiving responses from the landholding agencies regarding availability, HUD will publish in the Federal Register a list of all properties reviewed, including a description of the property, its address, and classification. The following designations will be made: ( 1 ) Properties that are suitable and available.
( 2 ) Properties that are suitable and unavailable.
( 3 ) Properties that are suitable and to be declared excess.
( 4 ) Properties that are unsuitable.
( b ) Information about specific properties can be obtained by contacting HUD at the following toll free number: 1-800-927-7588.
( c ) HUD will transmit to the ICH a copy of the list of all properties published in the Federal Register. The ICH will immediately distribute to all state and regional homeless coordinators area-relevant portions of the list. The ICH will encourage the state and regional homeless coordinators to disseminate this information widely.
( d ) No later than February 15 of each year, HUD will publish in the Federal Register a list of all properties reported pursuant to § 102-75.1170(b).
( e ) HUD will publish an annual list of properties determined suitable, but that agencies reported unavailable, including the reasons such properties are not available.
( f ) Copies of the lists published in the Federal Register will be available for review by the public in the HUD headquarters building library (room 8141); area-relevant portions of the lists will be available in the HUD regional offices and in major field offices.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that NATHAN M. BULL of the Law Firm of MCDERMOTT 

WILL & EMERY LLP hereby makes an appearance as counsel of record for Defendant STEPHEN 

CURRY, and directs that all responsive pleadings and papers in the above action be served upon 

the following:

Nathan M. Bull

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 4500

Miami, FL 33131

nbull@mwe.com

mblancoaleman@mwe.com

Respectfully submitted,

McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP

/s/ Nathan M. Bull

NATHAN M. BULL

nbull@mwe.com

Florida Bar No. 1029523

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue | Suite 4500

Miami, FL 33131

Tel: (305) 358-3500 | Fax: (305) 675-8146

Counsel for Defendant Stephen Curry

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 124 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 7th day of April, 2023, an electronic copy of the 

foregoing document was filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send 

notification of such filing to all counsel of record at their e-mail addresses on file with the Court. 

/s/ Nathan M. Bull 

NATHAN M. BULL

DM_US 195405294-1.119576.0012

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 124 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (Policy).

# ACTION:

 Notice of closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Commission on National Security/21st Century will meet in closed session on June 26-27, 2000.  The Commission was originally chartered by the Secretary of Defense on 1 July 1998 (charter revised on 18 August 1999) to conduct a comprehensive review of the early twenty-first century global security environment; develop appropriate national security objectives and a strategy to attain these objectives; and recommend concomitant changes to the national security apparatus as necessary. This meeting is being announced less than fifteen days before the meeting dates due to scheduling difficulties. 

The Commission will meet in closed session on June 26-27, 2000, to receive updates on Phase Three research and analysis and to provide overall guidance on the structure and content of the Phase Three report. Also, the Commissioners will receive a briefing on Consequence Management. By Charter, the Phase Three report is to be delivered to the Secretary of Defense no later than February 16, 2001.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C., Appendix II], it is anticipated that matters affecting national security, as covered by 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(1988), will be presented throughout the meeting, and that, accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.

# DATES:

Monday and Tuesday, June 26 and 27, 2000, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The Airlie Center, 6809 Airlie Road, Warrenton, VA 20187.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Keith A. Dunn, National Security Study Group, Suite 532, Crystal Mall 3, 1931 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202-3805.  Telephone 703-602-4175.

Dated: June 15, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-15560  Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
#### § 102-38.315 Are we required to use Alternative Disputes Resolution for sales contracts?

No, you are not required to use Alternative Disputes Resolution (ADR) for sales contracts. However, you are encouraged to use ADR procedures in accordance with the authority and the requirements of the Alternative Disputes Resolution Act of 1998 (28 U.S.C. 651-658).
### d? d 

### ontac s, 

# , w omou ,e e as ISorODosa 

### een ISCllsse

Organization Person Contacted Date 

### Response National Rusin('ss Aircraft Association Eli Corti 031l2J201O Regional Airline Association Dave Lottercr 

# 1 3/12/2010 Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 03/1212010 ATA Craig Fabian 03112/2010 

# tAAe,l.O 10=

# o~'i

I C t Wth h ts'd th FAAh th· Ib
§ 102-117.50 What are the advantages and disadvantages of contracting directly with a TSP under the FAR? ( a ) The FAR is an advantage to use when: ( 1 ) You ship consistent volumes in consistent traffic lanes;
( 2 ) You have sufficient time to follow FAR contracting procedures; and
( 3 ) Your contract office is able to handle the requirement.
( b ) The FAR may be a disadvantage when you: ( 1 ) Cannot prepare and execute a FAR contract within your time frame;
( 2 ) Have recurring shipments between designated places, but do not expect sufficient volume to obtain favorable rates; or
( 3 ) Do not have the manpower to monitor quality control and administer a contract.
[65 FR 60061, Oct. 6, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 51393, Aug. 20, 2010]
Hillsborough

No. 78-292

#### Marie Irene Lepage v. Roland L’Heureux

March 30, 1979

*Sheehan, Phinney, Bass & Green,*of Manchester *{James Q. Shirley*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Wiggin & Nourie,*of Manchester *{James W. Donchess*orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

On March 29,1970, plaintiff was a passenger in a motor vehicle that was involved in an accident while being operated by the defendant in *202Brockton, Massachusetts. Plaintiff brought suit against the defendant by writ dated August 10,1976. Defendant moved to dismiss because of the six-year statute of limitations. RSA 508:4. After a hearing, the motion was granted and plaintiffs exception was transferred by *Loughlin,*C.J.

 Plaintiff argues that because defendant was in and out of various hospitals outside the State, those times should be excluded so as to toll the running of the statute. The defendant testified, however, that during the period from the date of the accident to the time of the hearing, he had a residence in this State and that during the time when he was in the hospital in Massachusetts, he returned to his New Hampshire abode on weekends. The evidence supports a finding by the trial court that the defendant had an abode in New Hampshire where service of process could have been made and that there had been no tolling of the statute. In the absence of specific findings, the trial court is presumed to have made all findings necessary to support its decree. *Tibbetts v. Tibbetts,*109 N.H. 239, 248 A.2d 75 (1968).

*Exceptions overruled.*