alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 958.16 Transcript of proceedings.

Testimony and argument at oral hearings shall be reported verbatim, unless the Presiding Officer orders otherwise. Transcripts or copies of the proceedings may be obtained by the parties at such rates as may be fixed by contract between the reporter and the Postal Service.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3


AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND
STEPHEN S. ROMAINE


This Amendment No. 1 to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement (the "Agreement") between Tompkins Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and Stephen S. Romaine (the “Executive”) is hereby adopted as of this 12th day of November, 2019.
WITNESSES:
WHEREAS, the Company desires to retain the services of the Executive and is aware that it would suffer financial loss should the Executive enter the employment of a competitor; and
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to offer an inducement to the Executive to remain in its employ by agreeing to increase the compensation to be included in the benefit calculation under the Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the services heretofore rendered and to be rendered by the Executive, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1.    Effective as of November 12, 2019, Section 1.10 of the Agreement is hereby amended by the addition of a new sentence at the end thereof, as follows:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, for years beginning on and after January 1, 2019, the Executive’s Earnings shall also include fifty percent (50%) of any annual Senior Incentive Bonus paid on or before December 31.  
2.  In all other respects the provisions of the Agreement continue in full force and effect. 
Executed the day and year first entered above.
TOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORPORATION




By:     /s/  Thomas R. Rochon            


Name:    Thomas R. Rochon


ATTEST:    Bonita N. Lindberg        Title:      Chairman of the Board    




7440691.1
EXHIBIT 7
                                                                      ---------

                                  CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection  with the report of Western Oil Sands Inc. (the "Company") on the
Form 40-F for the  fiscal  year  ending  December  31,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that to the  best of my
knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
      Company.

DATED this 22nd day of February, 2007.



/s/ David A. Dyck
--------------------------------------
David A. Dyck
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer),
Western Oil Sands Inc.
§ 101-27.502 Criteria for return. Any GSA stock item to be returned to GSA by an agency which has no current or future requirements for that item shall meet the following conditions: ( a ) The minimum dollar value per line item, based on the current GSA selling price, shall be: ( 1 ) $130 for hand tools, FSG 51, and measuring tools, FSG 52; and
( 2 ) $450 for items in all other Federal supply groups and classes except for tires and tubes, FSC 2610; tool kits, FSC 5180; laboratory supplies, FSCs 6630 and 6640; Standard forms, FSC 7540; paints, dopes, varnishes, and related products, FSC 8010; preservatives and sealing compounds, FSC 8030; adhesives, FSC 8040; boxes, cartons, and crates, FSC 8115; and subsistence items, FSG 89, which are not returnable and shall be considered excess, and shall be processed in accordance with part 101-43 of this chapter.
( b ) The minimum remaining shelf life of this material shall be 12 months at the time of receipt by GSA.
( c ) The material shall not be a terminal or discontinued item.
( d ) The material shall be in either condition code A or condition code E.
[35 FR 12721, Aug. 11, 1970, as amended at 44 FR 39393, July 6, 1979; 56 FR 11939, Mar. 21, 1991]
Annual Emission Rate (lb/MMBTu)Percent

Reduction (%) Annual Emissions (tons)Emission

Reduction (tons) Baseline 0.418 NA 5548 NA Lime Injection 0.150 64.1% 1991 3557 Lime Injection with Additional Scrubber Vessel 0.080 80.9% 1062 4486
Lime Injection Costs ($2007) Total Capital Investment $3,000,000

Direct Annual Costs $1,600,000 Indirect Annual Costs $283,200 Total Annual Costs $1,883,200

Cost Effectiveness $529/ton

Lime Injection with Additional Scrubber Vessel Costs ($2007) Total Capital Investment $28,000,000

Direct Annual Costs $1,450,000 Indirect Annual Costs $2,643,200 Total Annual Costs $4,093,200

Cost Effectiveness $912/ton

Notes: (1) Baseline emissions are from CAMD, 2008-2010. (2) Costs are from 2007 and 2008 PPL reports. (3) Cost are in 2007$. Colstrip Unit 1 SO2 Emissions and Costs SummaryControl Option Annual Emission Rate (lb/MMBTu)Percent

Reduction (%) Annual Emissions (tons)Emission

Reduction (tons) Baseline 0.308 NA 4103 NA SOFA 0.200 34.9% 2671 1432 SNCR+SOFA 0.150 51.1% 2006 2097 SCR+SOFA 0.050 83.5% 678 3425

Notes: (1) Baseline emissions are from CAMD, 2008-2010.

Colstrip 1 NOx Emissions Summary
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA new NASA/MSFC mission analysis global cloud cover data baseA global cloud cover data set, derived from the USAF 3D NEPH Analysis, was developed for use in climate studies and for Earth viewing applications. This data set contains a single parameter - total sky cover - separated in time by 3 or 6 hr intervals and in space by approximately 50 n.mi. Cloud cover amount is recorded for each grid point (of a square grid) by a single alphanumeric character representing each 5 percent increment of sky cover. The data are arranged in both quarterly and monthly formats. The data base currently provides daily, 3-hr observed total sky cover for the Northern Hemisphere from 1972 through 1977 less 1976. For the Southern Hemisphere, there are data at 6-hr intervals for 1976 through 1978 and at 3-hr intervals for 1979 and 1980. More years of data are being added. To validate the data base, the percent frequency of  or = 0.3 and  or = 0.8 cloud cover was compared with ground observed cloud amounts at several locations with generally good agreement. Mean or other desired cloud amounts can be calculated for any time period and any size area from a single grid point to a hemisphere. The data base is especially useful in evaluating the consequence of cloud cover on Earth viewing space missions. The temporal and spatial frequency of the data allow simulations that closely approximate any projected viewing mission. No adjustments are required to account for cloud continuity.Document ID19850013568Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBrown, S. C.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Jeffries, W. R., III*(Computer Sciences Corp. Huntsville, Ala., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2448NAS 1.60:2448Accession Number85N21878Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850013568.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
-  2  -

February  29,  2000

August  31,  1999
Peoplesway.Com,  Inc.
Matthew  M.  Monroe
2969  Interstate  Street
Charlotte,  NC  28208


Dear  Matthew  M.  Monroe:

This  letter  of  understanding  is  to  confirm  our  discussions regarding the
agreement  between  DRM,  Inc.  (DRM)  and subsidiaries (RMC Group, Inc. and RMC
Group  Canada,  Ltd.)  and  Peoplesway.Com,  Inc.  (Peoplesway).
DRM  will utilize Peoplesway as its exclusive internet sales and marketing agent
beginning September 1, 1999.  We feel this agreement will be mutually beneficial
to  DRM  and  Peoplesway  to  create  an  internet  presence  and  sales.
Peoplesway  agrees  to  make  its  best effort to market on the internet the DRM
product  lines  and  other  product  lines  that  DRM may elect to offer through
alliances  and affiliate programs.  Peoplesway will also market and maintain the
sites  of  site  owners within the multi-eNetwork.  It will also understood that
Peoplesway will begin the process of becoming the host for all sites.  This will
include acquiring all necessary equipment, programming and staff to necessary to
provide  this  service.
In  addition  to  products, DRM will also provide warehouse space, office space,
customer  service,  warehouse and management personnel, supplies and other items
necessary  to  promote  the  products.
The  product  cost will be invoiced to Peoplesway at cost plus 10%.  The invoice
will be submitted by the appropriate subsidiary based on the cost of the product
sold  on  the  internet  for  each  subsidiary.
Each  subsidiary  will  also  invoice  Peoplesway for all services and personnel
provided  on their behalf, based on the percentage of internet sales compared to
their  total  sales.
We  are  excited  about the opportunity for growth by both our companies through
our  internet  sales  and  marketing agreement.  If we can be of any assistance,
please  do  not  hesitate  to  contact  us.
Regards,

R.  H.  Smtih
Vice  President  /  Secretary

Agreed  to  by  Matthew  M.  Monroe  on  behalf  of  Peoplesway.Com,  Inc.

_______________________          ___________
Matthew  M.  Monroe               Date
#### WILLIAM E. DEMAREST and another, Appellants, *v.*WILLIAM H. WICKHAM, Mayor of the City of New York, Respondent.

*Chapter*335, *Laws of*1873 — *assistant aldermen in the city of New Tork—power of legislature to abolish office*— *State Constitution, art.*10, § 2.

The power of the legislature over the office of assistant alderman in the city of Mew Tork, as it existed prior to the passage of the act of 1873, was unrestricted, except that during its continuance it could only be filled by election or appointment in the mode prescribed by section 2 of article 10 of the Constitution. Accordingly *held,*that chapter 335 of 1873, abolishing this office and transferring its powers and duties to the board of aldermen, was constitutional and valid.

Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint herein, and from a judgment entered pursuant to the same.

*W. S. Wolf,*for the appellants.

*T. B. Clarkson*and *E. Delafield Smith,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., concurred.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### § 101-39.205 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-14369-CIV-CANNON

GS HOLISTIC, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

PSL RETAIL CORP, et al., 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER VACATING CLERK’S DEFAULT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Clerk’s Entry of Default 

[ECF No. 13] and Clerk’s Entry of Default [ECF No. 14], both filed on February 10, 2023. 

Plaintiff’s Motion sought an entry of Clerk’s default as to Defendant NAJI FELLOWES and PSL 

RETAIL CORP (the “Defendants”). Plaintiff served the Defendants and January 18, 2023 

[ECF Nos. 11, 12], which ordinarily would require Defendants to respond to the Complaint on or 

before February 8, 2023, which Defendants did not do. However, the Court’s Combined Response 

Order, entered on November 1, 2022, states that “no Defendant shall file a response or answer 

until all Defendants in this action have been served” [ECF No. 6 p. 1]. Plaintiff has yet to serve 

Defendant AGYEMANG ATTA YOSEPH FELLOWES, and Plaintiff’s deadline to do so is not 

until March 23, 2023 [ECF Nos. 11, 12]. Thus, Defendants NAJI FELLOWES and PSL RETAIL 

CORP are not required to respond to the Complaint until all Defendants have been served. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Clerk’s Entry of Default as to Defendants NAJI FELLOWES and PSL RETAIL CORP 

[ECF No. 14] is VACATED.

Case 2:22-cv-14369-AMC Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
 CASE NO. 22-14369-CIV-CANNON

2

2. “After all Defendants have been served, Defendants shall submit a single combined 

response or separate answers within the time allowed for the last-served Defendant to 

respond” [ECF No. 6].

3. Plaintiff’s deadline to serve and file a notice of completion of service on AGYEMANG 

ATTA YOSEPH FELLOWES remains March 28, 2023 [ECF No. 12].

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 13th day of February 

2022.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

PSL RETAIL CORP

10008 South Federal Highway

Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952

PRO SE

NAJI FELLOWES

10008 South Federal Highway

Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952

PRO SE

Case 2:22-cv-14369-AMC Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 963.16 Transcript.

Testimony and argument at hearings shall be reported verbatim, unless the presiding officer otherwise orders. Transcripts or copies of the proceedings are supplied to the parties at such rate as may be fixed by contract between the reporter and Postal Service. Any party desiring a copy of the transcript shall order it from the contract reporter in a timely manner to avoid delay in filing briefs.
69806579;1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM 

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants. 

 / 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT UDONIS HASLEM 

Katherine A. Johnson, Esq., of the law firm Akerman LLP, hereby enters her appearance 

as counsel on behalf of Defendant Udonis Haslem and requests that copies of all orders, process, 

pleadings, and other documents filed or served in this matter be served on them via CM/ECF or at 

the address listed below, as appropriate.1

 Respectfully submitted, 

Date: April 7, 2023 AKERMAN LLP 

201 East Las Olas Boulevard – Suite 1800 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-2229 

Tel.: 954-463-2700 

Fax: 954-463-2224 

By: /s/ Katherine A. Johnson 

Katherine A. Johnson 

Florida Bar No.: 1040357 

katie.johnson@akerman.com 

Counsel for Defendant Udonis Haslem

1

 The filing of this Notice of Appearance does not waive Defendant Haslem’s right to 

proper service of process, which right is fully preserved. Defendant Haslem intends to challenge 

the purported “service” – which was “effected” through the process server’s tossing the summons 

packet onto the windshield of his wife’s vehicle miles from his home, see ECF No. 88-2, pg. 6 – 

by the April 14, 2023, deadline set by the Court. See ECF No. 49. 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 127 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 320.2 Suspension for certain data processing materials. ( a ) The operation of 39 U.S.C. 601(a) ( 1 ) through ( 6 ) and § 310.2(b) (1) through (6) of this chapter is suspended on all post routes for data processing materials defined in paragraph (c) of this section on the terms detailed in paragraph (b) of this section, subject to the operating requirements in § 320.3.
( b ) The suspension referred to in paragraph (a) of this section is for data processing materials conveyed ( 1 ) to a data processing center, if carriage is completed within 12 hours or by noon of the addressee's next business day and if data processing work is commenced on such materials within 36 hours of their receipt at the center; or
( 2 ) back from the data processing center to the address of the office originating the incoming materials, if carriage is completed within 12 hours or by noon of the addressee's next business day, and if data processing work was commenced on the incoming materials within 36 hours of their receipt at the center. For purposes of the time limitations for completion of delivery referred to in the preceding sentence, delivery of shipments between a domestic point and a foreign point shall be deemed to begin at the time materials of foreign origin are received at the international gateway city or end at the time materials of domestic origin leave the international gateway city. This suspension does not apply to carriages from or to originating offices that are neither part of the firm owning the data processing center nor data processing customers of the firm owning the data processing center.
( c ) For purposes of this suspension, ( 1 ) “addressee's next business day” means the first calendar day, stated in his local time, on which he conducts business, following the calendar day of dispatch, stated in the sender's local time;
( 2 ) “data processing” means electro-mechanical or electronic processing and includes the recording of data by electro-mechanical or electronic means for further processing; and
( 3 ) “data processing materials” means materials of all types that are sent exclusively for data processing and are ready for immediate data processing, but only if they are produced recurringly in the course of the normal business operations of the office originating them or receiving them back from the processing center. The performance of clerical work which is merely preparatory and incidental to the commencement of data processing is not, for purposes of this suspension, inconsistent with the requirement that the materials be sent exclusively for data processing and be ready for immediate data processing.
[44 FR 52834, Sept. 11, 1979]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000004507
<NAME> ORANGE-CO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,040
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (504)
<INVENTORY>                                     57,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,310
<PP&E>                                         164,778
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,939
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                        76,208
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,248
<SALES>                                         57,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,578
<CGS>                                          (50,117)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (50,117)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (3,393)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,189)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,814
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,814
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO HAC VICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Andrew B. Clubok of the law firm Latham & Watkins LLP

appears as counsel for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal, and requests that all papers served in this case 

also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Per Rule 4(b)(4) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, Mr. Clubok was previously admitted 

to appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen

and states that all information provided in support of his initial pro hac vice motion remains current 

and correct, including the sponsoring co-counsel.

Dated: May 8, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 187 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida Bar No. 305596 

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 187 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 101-5.105 Operation of the centralized facility. ( a ) GSA will continually appraise the operation of centralized facilities to insure their continued justification in terms of economy and efficiency. Centralized services provided pursuant to the regulation may be discontinued or curtailed if no actual savings or operating improvements are realized after a minimum operating period of one year. Occupying agencies will be consulted regarding the timing of curtailment or discontinuance of any centralized services and the heads of such agencies notified at least 120 days in advance of each action.
( b ) Where mutual agreement is reached, an agency other than GSA may be designated by the Administrator of General Services to administer the centralized service.
( c ) Arrangements with regard to financing will conform to the special requirements of each type of centralized service and to existing law. Normally, reimbursement will be made for the use of established services except where the cost is nominal or where reimbursement may not be practicable.
[30 FR 4199, Mar. 31, 1965, as amended at 56 FR 33874, July 24, 1991]