alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

               CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB


     I, Hunter M. A. Carr, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ITIS Holdings
Inc., a Nevada Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004
---------------------

/s/ Hunter M. A. Carr
---------------------
Name: Hunter M. A. Carr
Title: Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
**1997-  cotton_ginnings_12.23.97cotton_ginnings_12.11.97cotton_ginnings_11.25.97cotton_ginnings_11.10.97cotton_ginnings_10.24.97cotton_ginnings_10.10.97cotton_ginnings_09.25.97cotton_ginnings_09.12.97cotton_ginnings_08.12.97cotton_ginnings_03.25.97cotton_ginnings_02.12.97cotton_ginnings_01.24.97cotton_ginnings_01.09.97

**
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               EXHIBIT 11B.

                   SUNBEAM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  CALCULATIONS OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS
                         PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



                                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED                   NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                               ----------------------------       --------------------------
                                                               OCTOBER 1,     SEPTEMBER 29,       OCTOBER 1,   SEPTEMBER 29,
                                                                    1995             1996              1995         1996
                                                               ---------       -----------        ----------   -------------
                                                                       (Unaudited)                       (Unaudited)

<S>                                                             <C>             <C>                <C>            <C>
Net earnings (loss) applicable to common
 shareholders ..........................................       $   9,007       $(18,088)          $50,450       $ 6,478
                                                               =========       =========          ========      ========

Weighted average number of common
 shares outstanding ....................................          81,374         83,578            81,517        82,543

Add:

 Common shares issuable for exercise of 
 warrants and options, net of shares
 assumed to have been acquired with
 proceeds therefrom ....................................             904           --               1,440         1,250
                                                               ---------       --------           -------       -------

Number of shares applicable to fully diluted
 earnings (loss) per share calculation .................          82,278        83,578             82,957        83,793
                                                               =========      ========            =======       =======

Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share of
 common stock ..........................................       $     .11      $   (.22)           $   .61       $   .08

</TABLE>
From: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov Cc: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve Page/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph

Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wa yland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Alex Barron/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/02/2012 07:03 PM Subject: Updated GHG NSPS RIA 

### Dom, Attached is an updated version of the RIA. It incorporates the new analysis discussed in yesterday 's me eting and delivered earlier today as well as changes that make it consistent with the preamble and rule language sent over earlier today.

- Kevin 0 EGU GHG NSPS Exec Summary 0301.docx 1 EGU GHG NSPS Introduction 0301.docx 2 EGU GHG NSPS Control Strategies 0301.docx 3 EGU GHG NSPS Defining Climate Change Problem 0301.docx 4 EGU GHG NSPS Electric Power Sector Profile 0209.docx 6 EGU GHG NSPS Executive Order 0302.docx
5 EGU GHG NSPS Costs Benefits 0302 v2 acb.doc
§ 80.160 Montauk Point, NY to Atlantic Beach, NY. ( a ) A line drawn from the 40°50′17.952′′ N., 072°28′29.010′′ W. (Shinnecock Inlet Breakwater Light 2) to 40°50′23.490′′ N., 072°28′40.122′′ W. (Shinnecock Inlet Breakwater Light 1).
( b ) A line drawn from 40°45′47.763′′ N., 072°45′11.095′′ W. (Moriches Inlet Breakwater Light 2) to 40°45′49.692′′ N., 072°45′21.719′′ W. (Moriches Inlet Breakwater Light 1).
( c ) A line drawn from the westernmost point on Fire Island to the southernmost extremity of the spit of land at the western end of Oak Beach.
( d ) A line drawn from 40°34′23.568′′ N., 073°34′32.364′′ W. (Jones Inlet Light) 322° true across Jones Inlet to the shoreline.
[USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44280, July 27, 2015]
#### FANNY J. WHEELOCK, Appellant, *v.*GEORGE M. CUYLER, Respondent.

*Evidence—Code, section*399.

Where in an action of trespass, *quarre clausum fregit,*defendant claims to have entered as the agent of the owners, the testimony of plaintiff’s grantors as to conversations between them and a person deceased at the time of the trial, through whom defendant’s principal claims, is inadmissible under section 399 of the Code.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.

*Scott Lord,*for the appellant.

*James Wood,*for the respondent.

*415Opinion by

Morgan, J.

Present —Mullin, P. J., Smith and Morgan, JJ.

J udgment' affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION 

Case Number: 22-23355-CIV-MARTINEZ-BECERRA

PALMETTO EKG & ECHO READERS,

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, a

Florida Corporation (o/b/o Member #

U0536350801), 

Plaintiff,

v.

CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF FLORIDA,

INC., a Florida corporation,

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record.

1. Counsel for the non-removing party must file a motion to remand the case on the 

basis of any defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction within 30 days after the filing of 

the notice of removal under 28 U.S.C. §1446(b). Deadlines with respect to such motion will be 

governed by all relevant Local Rules.

2. Counsel for the removing party is directed to file a Removal Status Report no later 

than October 31, 2022. Failure to file a timely Removal Status Report shall be grounds for 

remand. 

The Removal Status Report shall contain the following:

a) A plain statement of the nature of the claim and any counterclaim, cross-claim, or 

third-party claim, made in state or federal court including the amount of damages 

claimed and any other relief sought.

b) A plain statement of the grounds for removal and a listing of all parties to the action, 

including parties to any third-party claim.

c) A list of all pending motions.

Case 1:22-cv-23355-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

d) A brief statement by each Defendant explaining whether or not each has joined the 

notice of removal.

e) State whether the Defendant has removed the action within 30 days after the receipt 

by the Defendant of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon 

which such action or proceeding is based.

3. If the removing party has provided some or all of the information requested above, 

briefly summarize the information requested and direct the Court to the location of the information 

in the record. 

4. No later than October 31, 2022, the removing party must file copies of all records 

and proceedings in the state court proceedings, including a true and correct copy of the docket 

sheet. To the extent there are any motions pending in the state court action, the parties shall 

separately re-file the motion, and relevant memoranda of law in support of or opposition to those 

motions. 

5. The removing party shall provide copies of this Notice to all concerned parties.

6. The parties are advised that failure to comply with any of the procedures contained 

in this Order or the Local Rules may result in dismissal of this action or entry of default. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 17th day of October, 2022.

_______________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies provided to:

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23355-JEM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2022 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walker C. Tompkins, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
------------------------------
Name:  Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 15, 2003
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 1
#### § 101-39.001 Authority.

Section 211 of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended, (40 U.S.C. 491), requires that the Administrator of General Services will, to the extent that he determines that so doing is advantageous to the Government in terms of economy, efficiency, or service, and after consultation with, and with due regard to the program activities of the agencies concerned, (a) consolidate, take over, acquire, or arrange for the operation by any executive agency of motor vehicles and other related equipment and supplies for the purpose of establishing fleet management systems to serve the needs of executive agencies; and (b) provide for the establishment, maintenance, and operation (including servicing and storage) of fleet management systems for transportation of property or passengers, and for furnishing such motor vehicles and related services to executive agencies. The exercise of this authority is subject to regulations issued by the President, which are set forth in Executive Order 10579, dated November 30, 1954.
#### THE CHATHAM NATIONAL BANK, Appellant, *v.*JAMES O’BRIEN, Sheriff, Respondent.

*Ohaitel mortgage*— agreement *that moiipagor may sett property*— powm' *of court to dvrect a verdict.*

“Where, in an action brought to recover property described in a chattel mortgage, the defendant alleges that the mortgage is void, because the mortgagors were authorized and allowed to sell the mortgaged property for their own benefit, the court cannot direct a verdict for the defendant unless an agreement has been made either in the mortgage itself or between the parties to it, the necessary construction of which permits such sales to be made. *(Frost*v. Wa/rreni 43 N. Y., 304; *Gfczrdner*v. *McBwen,*19 id., 133; *Bdgell*v. *Han't,*9 id., 313; *Gi-iswold*v. *Sheldon,*4 id., 581; *Ford*v. *Williams,*34-id., 359; *Oonkling*v. *Shelley,*38 id., 860; *Mitt&r*v. *Lockwood,*33 id., 393.)

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

*Abbott Brothers,*for appellant. *A. J. Yanderpoel*and *B. 8. Green,*for respondent.

Opinions by

Davis, P. J.,

and Bradt, J.. Daniels, J., concurred

with Davis, P. J.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
§ 183.590 Fire test. ( a ) A piece of equipment is tested under the following conditions and procedures: ( 1 ) Fuel stop valves, “USCG Type A1” or USCG Type A2” hoses and hose clamps are tested in a fire chamber.
( 2 ) Fuel filters, strainers, and pumps are tested in a fire chamber or as installed on the engine in the boat.
( 3 ) Fuel tanks must be tested filled with fuel to one-fourth the capacity marked on the tank in a fire chamber or in an actual or simulated hull section.
( b ) Each fire test is conducted with free burning heptane and the component must be subjected to a flame for 21 ⁄ 2 minutes.
( c ) If the component is tested in a fire chamber: ( 1 ) The temperature within one inch of the component must be at least 648 °C sometime during the 21 ⁄ 2 minute test;
( 2 ) The surface of the heptane must be 8 to 10 inches below the component being tested; and
( 3 ) The heptane must be in a container that is large enough to permit the perimeter of the top surface of the heptane to extend beyond the vertical projection of the perimeter of the component being tested.
( d ) If the component is being tested as installed on an engine, heptane sufficient to burn 21 ⁄ 2 minutes must be poured over the component and allowed to run into a flat bottomed pan under the engine. The pan must be large enough to permit the perimeter of the top surface of the heptane to extend beyond the vertical projection of the perimeter of the engine.
( e ) If a fuel tank is being tested in an actual or simulated hull section, the actual or simulated hull section must be of sufficient size to contain enough heptane to burn for 21 ⁄ 2 minutes in a place adjacent to the tank.
[CGD 74-209, 42 FR 5950, Jan. 31, 1977, as amended by CGD 77-98, 42 FR 36253, July 14, 1977; CGD 85-098, 52 FR 19729, May 27, 1987]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al. on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants. 

__________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Alexander Boies, Esq., Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having considered 

the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

The Motion is GRANTED. Alexander Boies, Esq. may appear and participate in this action 

on behalf of Plaintiff, Edwin Garrison. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of all 

electronic filings to Alexander Boies, Esq., at aboies@bsfllp.com. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this __ day of November, 2022.

 

HONORABLE K. MICHAEL MOORE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 8-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 960.19 Decision. ( a ) The adjudicative officer shall issue an initial decision on the application as promptly as possible after completion of proceedings on the application. The decision shall include written findings and conclusions on the applicant's eligibility and status as a prevailing party, and an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded. The decision shall also include, if at issue, findings on whether the Postal Service's position was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust. If the applicant has sought an award against the Postal Service and another agency, the decision shall allocate responsibility for payment of any award made between the Postal Service and the other agency, and shall explain the reasons for the allocation made.
( b ) The Board of Contract Appeals shall issue its decision on the application as promptly as possible after completion of proceedings on the application. Whenever possible, the decision shall be made by the same Administrative Judge or panel that decided the contract appeal for which fees are sought. The decision shall be in the format described in paragraph (a) of this section.
[46 FR 45945, Sept. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 6798, Mar. 5, 1987]
#### John Clarke v. State of Nebraska.

Filed June 26, 1894.

No. 6815.

Larceny: Sufficiency of Evidence. The evidence in this case *held*not to have justified a. conviction of plaintiff in error of the crime of larceny, as charged in the information against him. ,

Error to the district court for Webster county. Tried below before Beall, J.

*John M. Chaffin*and *James McNeny,*for plaintiff in error.

*George H. Hastings, Attorney General,*for the state.

-Ryan, C.

The plaintiff in.error was convicted in the district court of "Webster couuty upon the charge of unlawfully and feloniously stealing, taking, aud leading away a gelding. The evidence showed that the horse led away from the livery stable of F. M. Reed was the property of the accused. There was evidence that it had previously been levied upon by a constable under and by virtue of a writ of attachment in his hands, issued in an action pending before a justice of the peace in said county, the accused being the defendant named in said action. The horse was, after the levy, placed in the livery stable of F. M. Reed for safe keeping, from whence it was removed by the plaintiff in ■error. The conviction was upon an information which *371alleged that the horse was owned by E. M. Reed. . It is quite possible that the accused should have been punished for his misconduct. We are unable, however, to.find any justification in the statutes of this state .for convicting him of larceny, under the proofs as made. The judgment of the district court is .

Reversed.
§ 957.5 Case initiation. ( a ) Upon receipt of a request or referral from the Vice President, the Recorder will docket a case under this Part. Following docketing, the Judicial Officer will assign a Hearing Officer. The Hearing Officer will establish the schedule for the proceeding, perform all judicial duties under this Part and render Findings of Fact. Whenever practicable, a hearing should be conducted within 30 days of the date of docketing.
( b ) The request or referral from the Vice President shall include the notice of proposed debarment and the information or argument submitted by the Respondent pursuant to paragraphs (g) or (h) of § 601.113 of this subchapter.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof; I, John M. Scheurer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ John M. ScheurerName:
    John M. ScheurerDate: May 11, 2009
#### § 101-26.506-1 Types of service.

GSA interior planning and design services consist of data gathering and organizational analysis; development of a space requirements program; softline space plans; development of an interior design program (to include finish materials, furniture and furnishing specifications, and procurement data); and complete floor plans for telephones, electrical outlets, partitions, furniture, and equipment. The items specified for procurement will be selected from approved GSA sources of supply.

[41 FR 42953, Sept. 29, 1976]