alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eileen Chu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s)1350, as
adopted pursuant to (s)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    EILEEN
CHU      
|Eileen Chu             
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 14, 2007
### SERVED: JUNE 13, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0777 SKYWEST AIRLINES FAADOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0776 SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0869 SKYWEST AIRLINES FAADOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012

- 0868SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012

- 0874

SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0872 SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0873 SKYWEST AIRLINES FAADOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0904



### POSTPONEMENT The matters currently scheduled for July 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19, 2013, inclusive, inthe U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 5223, Wallace F. BennettFederal Building, 125 S. State Street, SaltLake City, UT 84138, be and are hereby postPoned.

# 0:&~<::[{;{(-i,~u:J Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

### FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0776, 2012-0777, 2012-0869, 2012-0868,2012-0874,2012-0872,2012-0873,2012-0904 (Civil Penalty Actions) SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

### Director, Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 Michael L. 

### Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

### MICHAEL L. 

### DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 EMAIL: 1aw@avialex.com Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.

### • • 

### U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00141-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.K.,

A CHILD

----------

FROM THE 360TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 360-474497-10

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Pro se Appellant J.K. attempts to “appeal the [trial] court’s decision at the 

April 17, 2015 hearing” in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. On April 

27, 2015, we notified the parties of our concern that we have no jurisdiction in 

this matter because it appeared that there was no final judgment or signed order 

subject to appeal; we also informed them that the notice of appeal was

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

premature.2

 We indicated that this appeal would be dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction if a party did not furnish this court with a signed copy of the order 

Appellant seeks to appeal by May 18, 2015.3

 We have received no response.

Meanwhile, we have received information that on April 17, 2015, an 

associate judge signed a “Communications Order” and an “Associate Judge’s 

Report for Additional Temporary Orders.” We have no way of knowing if one or 

both of those documents form the basis of Appellant’s appeal. Further, we have 

received information that the trial court cause has been consolidated with a more 

recently filed trial court cause bearing the same style, which also remains 

pending below.

The time for perfecting an appeal in a civil case runs from a signed 

judgment, not an oral rendition.4

 Further, temporary orders in suits affecting the 

parent-child relationship are not appealable.5

 Accordingly, even if the April 17, 

 2

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), 27.1(a).

3

See Stewart v. Stewart, No. 02-09-00285-CV, 2009 WL 3416553, at *1 

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 22, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.).

4

See id.; see also Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.

5

See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 105.001(e) (West 2014); see also Tex. Civ. 

Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a) (West 2015) (listing types of appealable 

interlocutory orders); Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.

2001) (stating that generally an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment 

and that a judgment is final and appealable if it disposes of all parties and all 

issues); In re J.W.L., 291 S.W.3d 79, 83 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, orig. 

proceeding [mand. denied]) (reiterating that temporary orders in family law cases 

are not appealable).
3

2015 decision Appellant complains of has been reduced to writing and signed by 

the trial judge, it is not appealable. We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.6

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 6, 2015

 6

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
#### § 965.5 Initial submissions by parties.

Within 15 days after receipt of the Recorder's notice, each party shall file via the Judicial Officer electronic filing system (*https://usps-judicialoffice.journaltech.com*) a sworn statement of the facts supporting its claim to receipt of the mail together with a copy of each document on which it relies in making such claim, and any arguments supporting its claim. Unless the presiding officer otherwise permits, all documents relative to this proceeding must be filed using the electronic filing system.

[81 FR 40195, June 21, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 61022, July 30, 2024]
#### § 3.70-10 Sector Honolulu Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

Sector Honolulu's office is located in Honolulu, HI. The boundaries of Sector Honolulu's Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone comprise the State of Hawaii, including all the islands and atolls of the Hawaiian chain and the adjacent waters of the exclusive economic zone (EEZ); and the following islands and their adjacent waters of the EEZ: American Samoa, Johnston Atoll, Palmyra Atoll, Kingman Reef, Wake Island, Jarvis Island, Howland and Baker Islands, and Midway Island. Sector Honolulu's Marine Inspection Zone also includes the Independent State of Samoa.

[USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7113

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOHN DOE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at W ilming ton

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 7:11

- cr
- 00085

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : Dec ember 2 0 , 2018 Decided: December 27, 2018 Amended: June 18, 2 020

Before D IAZ and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

John Doe, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
John Doe appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Doe , No. 7:11

- cr
- 00085

- D

- 1 (E.D.N.C. July 30, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### § 965.14 Public information.

The Librarian of the Postal Service maintains for public inspection in the Library copies of all initial, tentative, and final agency decisions and orders. Copies of decisions also are available on the Judicial Officer's section of the official Web site of the U.S. Postal Service. The Recorder maintains the complete official record of every proceeding.

[76 FR 15219, Mar. 21, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT 
OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS. 
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0000003941                        
<NAME>                    ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION     
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.000
<CASH>                                            489
<SECURITIES>                                       0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  68,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                      652
<INVENTORY>                                   130,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              211,551
<PP&E>                                        111,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                 46,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                291,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         169,570
<BONDS>                                         1,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          140
<OTHER-SE>                                    104,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  291,156
<SALES>                                       151,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              151,816
<CGS>                                         113,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 113,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18,203
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  103
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                19,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                    6,856
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0   
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.06
        


</TABLE>
§ 181.11 Exceptions to labeling requirement. ( a ) This part does not apply to boats or associated equipment intended solely for export, and so labeled, tagged, or marked on the boat or equipment and on the outside of the container, if any, which is exported.
( b ) If an item of associated equipment is so small that a certification label that meets the requirements in § 181.15 cannot be affixed to it, a certification label that contains the information required by § 181.15 may be printed on the smallest container in which the item is packed or on a slip packed with the item.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to any outboard motor or starting control to which § 183.710 of this chapter applies.
[CGD 72-60, 37 FR 15779, Aug. 4, 1972, as amended by CGD 79-137, 46 FR 3515, Jan. 15, 1981; 46 FR 9579, Jan. 29, 1981]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PARIS LAVAR GANTZ,

Petitioner

v.

PA DOC, S.C.I. ROCKVIEW, 

SUPERINTENDENT MARK GARMAN,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 152 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Motion/Declaration for Writ: Mandamus for 

Relief/Remedy” is DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

          - 14 CFR Part 71 
          - [Airspace Docket No. 99-AAL-18] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. 

# ACTION:

Final rule, correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This action corrects the error in the geographic description of a final rule that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on April 24, 2000 (65 FR 21644), Airspace Docket 99-AAL-18. The final rule revised the class E airspace at Unalaska, AK.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, June 15, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Durand, Operations Branch, AAL-531, Federal Aviation Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587; telephone number (907) 271-5898; fax: (907) 271-2850; email: Bob.Durand@faa.gov. Internet address: http://www.alaska.faa.gov/​at. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## History 

**Federal Register**                     Document 00-10015, Airspace Docket 99-AAL-18, published on April 24, 2000 (65 FR 21644), revised the Class E airspace area at Unalaska, AK. The coordinates for the Unalaska Airport are in error. The coordinates for the Unalaska Airport should read: lat. 53° 54′ 01′′ N., long. 166° 32′ 37′′ W. This action corrects this error.                 

## Correction to Final Rule 

                        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the error for the Class E airspace, Unalaska, AK, as published in the                         **Federal Register**                         April 24, 2000 (FR Document 00-10015), is corrected as follows:                     

1. On page 21645, Column 1, in the airspace description for Unalaska Airport, line 2, correct the coordinates to read “[lat. 53° 54′ 01′′ N., long. 166° 32′ 37′′ W.]”. 

Issued in Anchorage, AK, on June 6, 2000. 

Willis C. Nelson, 

Manager, Air Traffic Division, Alaskan Region. 

[FR Doc. 00-14863 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Jeffrey A. Neiman, Esq., of the law firm Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro LLP hereby 

enters his appearance as counsel on behalf of Defendant Kevin O’Leary and respectfully requests 

that copies of all future pleadings, orders, and other papers filed or served in this matter be served 

on him via CM/ECF or at the address listed below, as appropriate.

Date: January 31, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jeffrey A. Neiman

Jeffrey A. Neiman

Florida Bar No. 544469

MARCUS NEIMAN RASHBAUM & 

PINEIRO LLP 

100 SE 3rd Ave Ste 805

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394

Telephone: (954) 462-1200

jneiman@mnrlawfirm.com 

Counsel for Kevin O’Leary

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 31, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

served via CM/ECF on all counsel or parties of record.

By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Neiman

Jeffrey A. Neiman

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 2 of 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT COTY RANDOLPH PAULK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-3682 November 22, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Lon Arend, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maura J. Kiefer, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William C. Shelhart, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

**The Partners**Duke Realty Limited Partnership:

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement No.  333-108557-01 on Form S-3 of Duke RealtyLimited Partnership of our reports dated February 28, 2005, relating to theconsolidated balance sheets of Duke Realty Limited Partnership and Subsidiariesas of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, partners’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statementschedule III, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of DukeRealty Limited Partnership.

 

 

**KPMG LLP**Indianapolis, IndianaMarch 7, 2005

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 10.29
 Select Institutional Money Funds SM
  Account Number:
Account Name:  Account Address:   Tax ID Number:
  þ o o
 SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION  o þ
 SCHEDULE A
 1. Appointment as Agent
  2. Investment of Property
 2.1 Investment Authority.
 2.2 Corporate Actions.
 2.3 Use of Nominees.
 1




---



##### 



Select Institutional Money Funds SM
 2.4 Use of Securities Depository.
 3. Handling of Income and Principal Income
 3.1 Income.
 3.2 Principal.
 3.3 Collection Obligations.
 3.4 Additions to and Withdrawals from Account.
 4. Proxies and Corporate Literature
 4.1 Proxies.
 4.2 Corporate Literature.
 5. Statements and Confirmations
 5.1 Statements.
   2




---



##### 



Select Institutional Money Funds SM
 5.4 Confirmations.
  6. Use of Other Bank Services
   7. Instructions
  8. Compensation and Other Charges
 8.1 Compensation.
 8.2 Charging the Account.
 9. Limited Power of Attorney
  10. Indemnification
 3




---



##### 



Select Institutional Money Funds SM
  11. Amendment and Termination of Agreement
 11.1 Amendment.
 11.2 Termination.
 12. Entire Agreement
  13. Governing Law
  14. Taxation of Account
  15. Notices
 15.1 Mailing of Notices.
 15.2 Change of Address.
 4




---



##### 



Select Institutional Money Funds SM
 16. Effective Date
   Statements & Execution of Contract:Client
    
    þ
    
    Monthly
    
    o
    
    QuarterlyOther(Please supply address)
    
    o
    
    Monthly
    
    o
    
    QuarterlyAddendum:
    
    o
    
    Yes
    
    þ
    
    No
 Clients Signature
    
    Date/s/ Kelly A. Anderson
    
    7/25/06
 Accepted:Union Bank of California, N.A.By:
    
    /s/ Cathy Yoell
    
    7/27/06Relationship Manager
    
    DateBy:
    
    /s/ Sophie Scheller
    
    7/27/06Vice President
    
    Date
 5
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, William L.
Walton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William L. WaltonName:
    William L. WaltonDate: August 6, 2004