alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALBERTSON'S
QUARTERLY REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE 39 WEEKS ENDED OCTOBER 29, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>                                     
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      JAN-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           OCT-29-1998
<CASH>                                                      55,140
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              148,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 1,200
<INVENTORY>                                              1,448,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         1,757,440
<PP&E>                                                   5,931,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                           2,064,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           6,038,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    1,362,314
<BONDS>                                                  1,629,144
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                   245,556
<OTHER-SE>                                               2,412,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             6,038,267
<SALES>                                                 11,833,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        11,833,764
<CGS>                                                    8,634,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            8,634,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          78,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            602,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                               226,059
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        376,765
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               376,765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 1.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 1.53
        
 


</TABLE>
May 27, 2015 

 

Mr. Randy A. Hemmel 

80 Fawnridge Dr. 

Long Valley, NJ 07853 

Dear Mr. Hemmel: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 15, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1026), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C ELSO HER

N ANDEZ-AGUIR

RE, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-73578 Age n c y No. A092-430-689 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2014 ** B e fore : W ALLAC E, LEAVY, a nd B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s . C e lso He rna

nde z -Aguirre , a

native an d c itiz e n of M e xic o, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing his a pplic ation for c anc e lla

tion of 

# F IL ED DEC 17 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re m ova l. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e grant the pe tition for

re vie w a n d re m and. He rnande z -Aguirre c onte nds tha t the re is no ra

tiona le for c onc luding tha t his volunta ry re turn to M e x i c o te rm inate d his a c c rua l of c o ntinuous phy sic a l pre se nc e , whe re he ha d

a lre a dy a c c rue d te n y e ars of c ontinuous phy sic a l pre se nc e at the tim e he a c c e pte d volunta

ry re turn. B e c a

use He rnan de z -Aguirre ra ise d this c onte ntion to the B IA, and the B IA did not c o nside r it, we re m and to thea ge nc y to c onside r in the first insta

nc e whe the r a

volunta ry re turn inte rrupts a

n a lie n’ s a c c rua l of c ontinuous phy sic a l pre se n c e whe re an a lie n ha s a lre a dy a c c rue d te n y e ars of c ontinuous pre se nc e at the tim e he a c c e pts volunta ry re turn. C

oronado v . Holde r , 759 F.3d 977, 987 (9th C ir. 2014) (unde r the ordina ry re m and rule , we do not de c ide a c la im the a g e nc y

ha s not a ddre sse d, but re m and the c l a im to the a ge nc y

to c onside r in the first insta

nc e ). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WG RANT E D; RE M ANDE D .

12- 73578 2
<Page>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY




       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Donald E. Steen, Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik and each of
them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his
behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United
Surgical Partners International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite
and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents
and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.






                                            /s/ James C. Crews
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            James C. Crews
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 3, 2021

No. 04-20-00589-CV

IN RE Eloise and Ruben GUZMAN,

From the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CV-0212

Honorable Bill Squires, Judge Presiding

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Real Party in Interest's opposed emergency motion for stay is GRANTED. We ORDER

the trial court proceedings are stayed pending this court's disposition of the pending motion for

rehearing. We order relator's response to the motion is due no later than March 18, 2021.

It is so ORDERED on March 3, 2021.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3 day of March, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CV-0212, styled Ruben Guzman and Eloise Guzman v. Mary A. 

Derrick All Other Occupants, pending in the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Bill Squires

presiding.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Zhone Technologies, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-115306 and 333-113320) and in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-117142, 333-110713, 333-98855, 333-88732, 333-83422, 333-73352 and 333-61956) of Zhone Technologies, Inc. of ourreports dated March 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Zhone Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, redeemable convertible preferred stockand stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2005, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Zhone Technologies, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Mountain View, California. 

March 8, 2006
§ 72.01-10 Notice to Mariners. ( a ) “Notice to Mariners” is intended to advise mariners of new hydrographic discoveries, changes in channels and navigational aids, and information concerning the safety of navigation. “Notice to Mariners” also contains information— ( 1 ) Useful in updating the latest editions of charts and publications of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, National Ocean Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Coast Guard;
( 2 ) Selected from the “Local Notice to Mariners” issued and published by the 1st, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 11th, 13th, 14th, and 17th Coast Guard districts; and
( 3 ) Compiled from foreign notices to mariners, ship reports, and similar cooperating observer reports.
( b ) “Notice to Mariners” is published weekly by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. The “Notice to Mariners” is prepared jointly by the: ( 1 ) Coast Guard;
( 2 ) National Ocean Service; and
( 3 ) National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.
( c ) This notice may be accessed through the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency's Web site (*http://msi.nga.mil/NGAPortal/MSI.portal*); look for “Notice to Mariners”.
[CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33362, June 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33640, June 25, 2001; USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24984, May 5, 2004; USCG-2009-0416, 74 FR 27438, June 10, 2009; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39170, July 1, 2013]
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AGREEMENT is made on October 22, 2009, by and between JAMES YEUNG
(hereinafter the "Creditor") and SAFER SHOT, INC.( hereinafter the "Debtor").

   1.  Debtor will issue and deliver to Creditor in full settlement of this
matter ( Note payable in the amount of $121,393.12 and FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT
AND STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT dated April 30, 2009.) shares of its common
stock as set forth:

   37,000,000 shares to be received by Plaintiff on or before October 22, 2009.

   2.  Each share shall be issued and delivered to Creditor at the price of
$.005 per share, the market price of the Debtor's stock on April 30, 2009.

   3.  A facsimile signature shall be deemed an original for purposes of this
agreement.

   In witness whereof, the parties hereto have set forth their hands and
seals on the date herein above written.



CREDITOR                                             SAFER SHOT, INC.


/s/ James Yeung                                      /s/ John Lund
-----------------                                    -----------------
    James Yeung                                          John Lund, President
250 E Street SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 / 800-942-2677

202-606-5000 / 800-942-2677

MEMORANDUM 

Date: January 11, 2023 

To: AmeriCorps State and National Grantees 

From: Sonali Nijhawan, Director, AmeriCorps State and National 

Cc: Office of Regional Operations

Office of Monitoring

Office of General Counsel 

Subject: 2023.02: AmeriCorps State and National Guidance – Living Allowance

 

Member Living Allowance Definition:

The agency, an applicant, or a grantee can define the AmeriCorps State and National

AmeriCorps member living allowance as the living allowance that a program is paying 

a member. No other member benefits are required to be included in a program’s 

calculation to determine the living allowance amount or whether the program is 

compliant with the maximum living allowance amount.

Please distribute, as appropriate, to your subgrantees and/or operating sites and/or 

service site locations and/or other interested parties.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.213-6 Content of orders.

The final decision may provide for suspension or termination of, or refusal to grant or continue Federal financial assistance, in whole or in part, to which this regulation applies, and may contain such terms, conditions, and other provisions as are consistent with and will effectuate the purposes of the Act and this subpart 101-6.2, including provisions designed to assure that no Federal financial assistance to which this regulation applies will thereafter be extended to the applicant or recipient determined by such decision to be in default in its performance of an assurance given by it pursuant to this subpart, or to have otherwise failed to comply with this subpart, unless and until it corrects its noncompliance and satisfies the responsible GSA official that it will fully comply with this subpart.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, (the
Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the
Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, Penni F. Roll, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                          
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                                
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Penni F. Roll      
| |                        
| | Name:   Penni F. Roll  
| | Date: November  8, 2007
#### § 102-117.40 When is it advantageous for me to use another agency's contract or rate tender for transportation services?

It is advantageous to use another agency's contract or rate tender for transportation services when the contract or rate tender offers better or equal value than otherwise available to you.
EXHIBIT
21





Description of
Subsidiaries





As of
September 30, 2008, Teleconnect Inc . has five subsidiaries, specifically: (i)
Teleconnect Comunicaciones, S.A., a company organized under the laws of Spain;
and (ii) ITS Europe S.L., a company organized under the laws of Spain. (iii)
Teleconnect Telecom S.L., a company organized under the laws of Spain, (iv)
PhotoWizz B.V., a company organized under the laws of Holland; and (v)
Recarganet S.L., a company organized under the laws of Spain.





As of the
date of this filing, August 12, 2009,   ITS Europe has been sold
before a notary to a third party and the next shareholders’ meeting will seek
approval from the shareholders to sell Teleconnect Comunicaciones SA and
Teleconnect Telecom SL.  If approved, Teleconnect Inc would cease to
have interests in Spain and would focus its future business strategy on a new
retail business initially based in Holland.
#### § 501.19 Intellectual property.

Providers submitting Postage Evidencing Systems to the Postal Service for approval are responsible for obtaining all intellectual property licenses that may be required to distribute their product in commerce and to allow the Postal Service to process mail bearing the indicia produced by the Postage Evidencing System. To the extent approval is granted and the Postage Evidencing System is capable of being used in commerce, the provider shall indemnify the Postal Service for use of such intellectual property in both the use of the Postage Evidencing System and the processing of mail bearing indicia produced by the Postage Evidencing System.
Be a changemaker in 

your community.

From mentoring students to higher academic achievement, being 

the first to respond when disaster strikes, helping families facing 

hunger, restoring public lands, or even rehabilitating affordable 

housing, you can help build a better future in your community.

Choose your future. Choose AmeriCorps.

AmeriCorps.gov/Serve
Be a changemaker in 

your community.

From mentoring students to higher academic achievement, being 

the first to respond when disaster strikes, helping families facing 

hunger, restoring public lands, or even rehabilitating affordable 

housing, you can help build a better future in your community.

Choose your future. Choose AmeriCorps.

AmeriCorps.gov/Serve
Be a changemaker in 

your community.

From mentoring students to higher academic achievement, being 

the first to respond when disaster strikes, helping families facing 

hunger, restoring public lands, or even rehabilitating affordable 

housing, you can help build a better future in your community.

Choose your future. Choose AmeriCorps.

AmeriCorps.gov/Serve
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 22-23320-CIV-MARTINEZ 

DIANNA CRAVENER and CHRISTIANAH 

ADARAMAJA individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

 

 v. 

SEDUCTION COSMETIC CENTER CORP, 

Defendant. 

____________________________________/ 

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

 Pursuant to the Court’s Order, [DE 26], the parties file this joint status report, and 

state: 

1. On March 31, 2023, Defendant’s new (incoming) counsel, Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., 

informed Plaintiffs’ counsel that they were retained to represent Defendant in the above 

referenced case. 

2. Based on subsequent discussions between Plaintiffs’ counsel and Defendant’s new 

counsel, and Defendant’s position that class data would not be provided in advance of the 

mediation, the Plaintiffs concluded that mediation on April 19, 2023 would not be fruitful 

at this stage. 

3. As such, the Parties have agreed to the following schedule, pending the Court’s approval: 

a. Plaintiffs shall file its amended consolidated complaint, to include Plaintiff 

Christianah Adaramaja by April 28, 2023. 

Case 1:22-cv-23320-JEM Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/2023 Page 1 of 2
b. Defendant shall file a response by May 18, 2023. 

Date: April 19, 2023 

Respectfully Submitted, 

DAPEER LAW, P.A. 

Rachel N. Dapeer, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 108039 

Email: rachel@dapeer.com 

Dapeer Law 

20900 N.E. 30th Ave., Suite 417 

Aventura, FL 33180 

Tel.: 305.610.5223 

Hiraldo P.A. 

/s/ Manuel S. Hiraldo 

Manuel S. Hiraldo, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 030380 

401 E. Las Olas Boulevard 

Suite 1400 

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

Email: mhiraldo@hiraldolaw.com 

Telephone: 954.400.4713 

The Law Offices of Jibrael S. Hindi 

Jibrael S. Hindi 

Florida Bar No. 118259 

110 SE 6th Street, Suite 1744 

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 

/s/ Andrew G. Simon* 

Andrew G. Simon, Esquire 

Nicholas M. Nash, Esquire 

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. 

Email: Nicholas.NashII@csklegal.com; 

Andrew.Simon@csklegal.com; 

Magaly.Triana@csklegal.com

*Counsel for Defendant – Pending order by the Court granting substitution of counsel for 

Defendant. 

Case 1:22-cv-23320-JEM Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 965.4 Presiding officers. ( a ) The presiding officer shall be an Administrative Law Judge, an Administrative Judge qualified in accordance with law, or any other qualified person licensed to practice law designated by the Judicial Officer to preside over a proceeding conducted pursuant to this part. The Judicial Officer assigns cases under this part. Judicial Officer includes Associate Judicial Officer upon delegation thereto. The Judicial Officer may, on his or her own initiative or for good cause found, preside at the reception of evidence.
( b ) The presiding officer has authority to: ( 1 ) Take such action as may be necessary to preside properly over the proceeding and render decision therein;
( 2 ) Render an initial decision, if the presiding officer is not the Judicial Officer; or if the presiding officer is the Judicial Officer, issue a tentative or a final decision or order.
[52 FR 29012, Aug. 5, 1987, as amended at 75 FR 6570, Feb. 10, 2010; 76 FR 15219, Mar. 21, 2011]
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.3
[NAME] - Equity Award Notification
[DATE] Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit (PRSU) Award
Target Grant Value: $[_____]
Number of Shares: Based on [DATE]
	
		
	Award Type
	Number of Shares

	PRSUs
	[_____]




Note: The terms of the [DATE] Annual Equity Award are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Ralph Lauren Corporation 2019 Long-Term Incentive Plan as well as with the terms and conditions of executive’s employment agreement date [DATE]. These awards are contingent upon signing the PRSU Equity Agreement which will be presented for execution on [DATE].
Information concerning goals is strictly confidential
PRSUs:
		
	•
	Vest over a three‐year period in one‐third annual installments (tranches) beginning FY21 if the FY20 performance goal (ROIC of [__]%) is achieved and certified by the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee, and employment is continuous.










1