alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No: 3325]


Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation; Notice 
of Meeting

    The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation will 
meet in the Department of State, 2201 ``C'' Street NW, Washington, DC, 
July 10-11, 2000, in Conference Room 1205. Prior notification and a 
valid photo are mandatory for entrance into the building. One week 
before the meeting, members of the public planning to attend must 
notify Gloria Walker, Office of Historian (202-663-1124) providing 
relevant dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and telephone 
numbers.
    The Committee will meet in open session from 1:30 p.m. through 4:30 
p.m.on Monday, July 10, 2000, to discuss the implementation of 
Executive Order 12958 with respect to Department of State records, the 
declassification and transfer of Department of State electronic records 
to the National Archives and Records Administration, and the 
modernization of the Foreign Relations series. The remainder of the 
Committee's sessions from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 
11, 2000, will be closed in accordance with Section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The agenda calls for 
discussions involving consideration of matters not subject to public 
disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that the public interest 
requires that such activities be withheld from disclosure.
    Questions concerning the meeting should be directed to William 
Slany, Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic 
Documentation, Department of State, Office of the Historian, 
Washington, DC, 20520, telephone (202) 663-1123, (e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4bcbda7a0bba6ad94a7a0b5a0b1fab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8b0b1abacb7aaa198abacb9acbdf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>).

    Dated: May 31, 2000.
William Slany,
Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic 
Documentation, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 00-15023 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Produced and published at US taxpayer expense

TO: Program Leadership

FROM: Danielle Melfi, Chief Program Officer

DATE: July 5, 2023

RE: Addendum to End of Public Health Emergency and Program Flexibilities

AmeriCorps released a memo on June 2, 2023 related to the End of Public Health 

Emergency and Program Flexibilities. Within the memo was the following:

The following flexibilities from the CARES Act expired as of May 10, 2023: 

1. Education Award Flexibilities; 

A. Under Section 3514 (a) AmeriCorps members serving in positions eligible 

for an education award who exited early for COVID-related reasons could, in 

some circumstances, receive a full education award. 

B. This affects members in AmeriCorps State and National, AmeriCorps VISTA, 

and AmeriCorps NCCC.

AmeriCorps members who were exited between May 10, 2023 and June 2, 2023 with a 

compelling personal circumstance due to COVID and the program requested a full education 

award for their slot type will be allowed to receive their entire education award. This 

exception is being made as a result of the COVID emergency ending on May 10, 2023 and 

the memo from AmeriCorps being sent on June 2, 2023.
#### § 102-118.660 May a TSP appeal a postpayment audit decision of the CBCA?

No, a ruling by the CBCA is the final administrative remedy and the TSP has no statutory right of appeal. This subpart governs administrative actions only and does not affect any rights of the TSPs. A TSP may still pursue a legal remedy through the courts.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 30476, June 26, 2009]
TRI-ISTHMUS GROUP, INC. 2007 FORM 10-KT/A **Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Dennis M. Smith, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Transition Report on Form 10-K of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 11, 2008       By:  /s/ Dennis M. Smith   Dennis M. Smith   Chief Financial Officer
§ 101-26.307 Processing overages, shortages, and damages. ( a ) Transportation-type discrepancies shall be processed in accordance with the instructions in subpart 101-40.7 when the discrepancies are the fault of the carrier and occur while the shipments are in the possession of: ( 1 ) International ocean or air carriers, regardless of who pays the transportation charges, except when shipment is on a through Government bill of lading (TGBL) or is made through the Defense Transportation System (DTS) (Discrepancies in shipments on a TGBL or which occur while in the DTS shall be reported as prescribed in subpart 101-26.8.); or
( 2 ) Carriers within the continental United States, when other than GSA or DOD pays the transportation charges.
( b ) Reporting discrepancies or deficiencies in material or shipments and processing requests for or documenting adjustments in billings from or directed by GSA activities shall be in accordance with the provisions of subpart 101-26.8.
[41 FR 56320, Dec. 28, 1976]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Onthe luminous efficiency of meteors**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:8/5
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001061303
 
June 18, 2018
#### Ferber J. COLEMAN, Appellant, v. W. Frank SMYTH, Jr., Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary, Appellee.

No. 7729.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 8, 1958.

Decided Oct. 10, 1958.

Charles W. Laughlin, Richmond, Va., for appellant. Ferber J. Coleman, pro se, on the brief.

Thomas M. Miller, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Virginia (A. S. Harrison, Jr., Atty. Gen. of Virginia, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge, and HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was tried and convicted upon a charge of murder in the Circuit Court of Culpeper County, Virginia. Thereafter he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court *519of Clifton Forge, Virginia. The Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia denied a writ of error in an order in which it is recited that a transcript of the proceedings had been reviewed. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. 356 U.S. 923, 78 S.Ct. 708, 2 L.Ed.2d 718. The defendant then filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. After consideration, Judge Hoffman filed a memorandum explaining his reasons for denying the writ and concluding that the petition is a “manifest abuse of the habeas corpus process.” 166 F.Supp. 934, 938.

The prisoner complains that he did not have the assistance of counsel, but the transcript discloses that an able attorney was appointed to represent him, that the defendant generally refused legal assistance, that his rights were carefully explained to him and the trial judge went to the length of requiring the appointed counsel to remain in the courtroom throughout the trial to render such advice and assistance as the defendant would accept.

The defendant did request and receive the assistance of the appointed counsel when striking the jury. Nevertheless, he complains that one of the jurors who served had disclosed on his voir dire that for a number of years he had been a business associate of the murder victim, though he did not believe that fact would affect the impartiality of his judgment. The defendant did not challenge the juror for cause and chose to leave him on the jury when using his peremptory challenges. The victim was the defendant’s step-father and the defendant evidently had reason to believe the juror would be more inclined in his favor than others on the panel.

For the reasons more fully stated in Judge Hoffman’s careful memorandum, the petition was properly dismissed. Without a certificate of probable cause, the appeal to this Court will be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
§ 102-33.390 What information must we report on Government aircraft? You must report the following information to GSA (for information regarding how to report this information, see: *https://gsa.inl.gov/fairs/*): ( a ) Inventory data on Federal aircraft, including your Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), through FAIRS;
( b ) Cost and utilization data on Federal aircraft, including your Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), through FAIRS;
( c ) Cost and utilization data on CAS aircraft and related aviation services (see definition of “Government aircraft” for more on CAS), through FAIRS;
( d ) Accident and incident data (see § 102-33.445); and
( e ) The results of standard competition studies in compliance with OMB Circular A-76 to justify purchasing, leasing, modernizing, replacing, or otherwise acquiring aircraft and related aviation services.
#### § 3055.101 Public Performance Dashboard.

The Postal Service shall develop and maintain a publicly available website with an interactive web-tool that provides performance information for Market Dominant products. This website shall be updated on a weekly basis, no later than one month from the date of data collection. The website shall include, at a minimum, the reporting requirements specified in § 3055.102 and adhere to the formatting requirements specified in § 3055.103.
#### § 101-25.103-2 [Reserved]
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0756. KENROY KEVON POWELL v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF

HUMAN SERVICES, EX REL. AYIESHA BURTON.

Kenroy Powellfiled this direct appeal from the superior court’s order enforcing

an out-of-state child support order. We lack jurisdiction.

“Appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic

relations cases” must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review.

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b). Because this case involvesthe collection of child support,

it is a domestic relations case within the meaning of the discretionary appeal statute.

See Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 317 Ga. App. 426, 427 (731 SE2d 110)

(2012) (an action in which the “underlying subject matter is a father’s obligation to

provide child support” is “a domestic relations case subject to review only by

application”). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is

jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept.of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d

60) (1996).Accordingly, Powell was required to comply with the discretionary appeal

procedure to obtain review of the superior court’s order.

January 03, 2024
His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED. See Booker, 317 Ga. App. at 427.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/03/2024
§ 102-33.470 Must we develop performance indicators? Yes, your agency must develop performance indicators in order to measure the degree to which key aviation program objectives are achieved. It is suggested that your performance indicators: ( a ) Measure the contribution of the aviation program toward the accomplishment of the agency's mission;
( b ) Support and justify aviation program budget requests; and
( c ) Demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the aviation program's performance.
#### § 101-25.103-1 General.

Federal agencies in a position to receive promotional materials, trading stamps, or bonus goods shall establish internal procedures for the receipt and disposition of these gratuities in accordance with § 101-25.103. The procedures shall provide for a minimum of administrative and accounting controls.

[48 FR 48232, Oct. 18, 1983]
Exhibit 12
                        AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
           Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (in millions)

                                   Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
                                         June 30,            June 30,
                                       2005     2004      2005     2004

Earnings (loss):
  Earnings (loss) before income
    taxes                               $  41   $ (13)     $(130)   $(195)

  Add:  Total fixed charges (per below)   368     372        751      740

  Less:  Interest capitalized              24      19         46       36

    Total earnings before income taxes  $ 385   $ 340      $ 575    $ 509

Fixed charges:
  Interest                              $ 164   $ 162      $ 341    $ 322

  Portion of rental expense
    representataive of the interest
    factor                                201     207        405      413

  Amortization of debt expense              3       3          5        5

    Total fixed charges                 $ 368   $ 372      $ 751    $ 740


 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges      1.05       -          -        -

 Coverage deficiency                    $   -   $  32      $ 176    $ 231


Note:    As  of  June  30, 2005, American has guaranteed approximately
   $1.3  billion  of  AMR's  unsecured  debt  and  approximately  $447
   million  of  AMR  Eagle's  secured  debt.   The  impact  of   these
   unconditional guarantees is not included in the above computation.
§ 102-36.155 What are our responsibilities when acquiring excess personal property for use by a non-federal recipient? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67866 , Aug. 22, 2024.
When acquiring excess personal property for use by a non-federal recipient, your authorized agency official must: ( a ) Ensure the use of excess personal property by the non-federal recipient is authorized and complies with applicable federal regulations and agency guidelines.
( b ) Determine that the use of excess personal property will reduce the costs to the government and/or that it is in the government's best interest to furnish excess personal property.
( c ) Review and approve transfer documents for excess personal property as the sponsoring Federal agency.
( d ) Ensure the non-federal recipient is aware of his obligations under the FMR and your agency regulations regarding the management of excess personal property.
( e ) Ensure the non-federal recipient does not stockpile the property but places the property into use within a reasonable period of time, and has a system to prevent nonuse, improper use, or unauthorized disposal or destruction of excess personal property furnished.
( f ) Establish provisions and procedures for property accountability and disposition in situations when the government retains title.
( g ) Report annually to GSA excess personal property furnished to non-federal recipients during the year (see § 102-36.295).
AFS-13-517-E

October 21, 2013

 Exemption No. 10875

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0755

Ms. Rosa Martinez

Parent of Jazlyn Martinez

4839 W. Wabansia, 1st FL

Chicago, IL 60639

Dear Ms. Martinez:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received August 22, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Jazlyn Martinez for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Jazlyn to 

exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, 

manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard 

a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Jazlyn.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9834.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Jazlyn Martinez an exemption from § 121.311(b). In 

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Jazlyn is

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary 

to allow her to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Jazlyn’s parents or 

a caregiver accompanying her. Jazlyn Martinez may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind her. In addition, Jazlyn’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of 

this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

Enclosure
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, (the
Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the
Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, Penni F. Roll, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:



|    |                                                                                                                                          
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                                
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Registrant.



| |                      
| | ---------------------
| | /s/ Penni F. Roll    
| |                      
| | Name:   Penni F. Roll
| | Date: August 9, 2007