alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sento Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick F. O'
Neal, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Patrick F. O' Neal
------------------------------
Patrick F. O' Neal
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         461,439
<SECURITIES>                                20,018,888
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,776,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 18,006,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,633,489
<PP&E>                                      19,749,874
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,439,354)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,940,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,645,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,537,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,926,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,940,361
<SALES>                                     29,145,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,145,811
<CGS>                                       19,565,726
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,565,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,758,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,365,108
<INCOME-TAX>                                   940,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,425,108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,425,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.89
        

</TABLE>
-cr-06240-WPD Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2001 P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Freedom  Financial  Corporation
on Form  10-KSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 136.107 Subrogated claims. ( a ) The claims of subrogor (e.g., insured) and subrogee (e.g., insurer) for removal costs and damages arising out of the same incident should be presented together and must be signed by all claimants.
( b ) A fully subrogated claim is payable only to the subrogee.
( c ) A subrogee must support a claim in the same manner as any other claimant.
129204488 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-22307-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

MARIA FERNANDA SOTO LEIGUE, 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

EVERGLADES COLLEGE, INC. d/b/a 

KEISER UNIVERSITY, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________/

DEFENDANT EVERGLADES COLLEGE, INC. D/B/A KEISER UNIVERSITY’S

NOTICE OF FILING STATE COURT DOCKET SHEET

Defendant Everglades College, Inc. d/b/a Keiser University (“Defendant”), by and through 

its undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Court’s Order on Post-Removal Procedures, and 

Requiring Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties (ECF No. 3), hereby gives 

notice of filing a copy of the docket sheet in the action filed in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh 

Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida styled Maria Fernanda Soto Leigue v. 

Everglades College, Inc. d/b/a Keiser University, Case No. 2022-008872-CA-01.

DATED: July 27, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Maria K. Vigilante 

Maria K. Vigilante (Florida Bar No. 98822)

Maria.Vigilante@blankrome.com

BLANK ROME LLP

Broward Financial Centre

500 East Broward Boulevard, Suite 2100

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394

Tel.: 954.512.1800

Fax: 813.433.5564

Case 1:22-cv-22307-BB Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 1 of 5
2 

129204488 

Justin C. Sorel (Florida Bar No. 0016256)

Justin.Sorel@csklegal.com

COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A. 

Esperante Building

222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 120

West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Tel.: 561.383.9200

Fax: 561.683.8977

Attorneys for Defendant

EVERGLADES COLLEGE, INC.

Case 1:22-cv-22307-BB Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:22-cv-22307-BB Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:22-cv-22307-BB Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 4 of 5


	

	


		
	



Case 1:22-cv-22307-BB Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 5 of 5
#### THE AMERICAN SILK WORKS, Respondent, *v.*I. J. SALOMON, Appellant.

Corporations—■ *acquisition of propet'ty before incorporation completed—subscriptions may be in chattels.*

Corporations may acquire title to money paid upon subscriptions to capital stock before tire corporation has a legal existence, and such subscriptions may be in the form of property other than money.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff herein, entered on the report of a referee. The action was brought for the alleged conversion by the defendant of certain steam gas-pipes, etc., the property of the plaintiff.

*Gardiner &*Goodhart, for the appellant.

*Williams*Brothers, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Gilbert, J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Barnard, P. J., dissented.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30453 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERT HILLS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-167-E

- - - - - - - - - - December 11, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Robert Hills appeals his conviction and sentence for being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Hills argues that his two prior Louisiana convictions were insufficient to be predicate felonies for purposes of § 922(g)(1). Contrary to Hills’ contention, his 1972 conviction did not result in an automatic pardon upon the completion of his sentence. See State v. Baxter , 357 So. 2d 271,No. 96-30453 - 2 - 273 (La. 1978). Because the 1972 conviction was a proper predicate felony under § 922(g)(1), we do not address Hills’ contention concerning his 1994 Louisiana conviction. Hills attempts to argue the propriety of the sentencing range used by the district court. He fails to provide an argument. Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(6); see United States v. Maldonado , 42 F.3d 906, 910 n.7 (5th Cir. 1995). Hills’ remaining contentions, concerning the lack of a motion for downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, do not rise to the level of plain error. See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).
AFFIRMED.
§ 966.3 Definitions. ( a ) *Accounting Service Center* refers to the United States Postal Service Eagan Accounting Service Center or its successor installation.
( b ) *Administrative offset* refers to the withholding of money payable by the Postal Service or the United States to, or held by the Postal Service or the United States for, a former employee in order to satisfy a debt determined to be owed by the former employee to the Postal Service.
( c ) *Debt* refers to any amount determined by the Postal Service to be owed to the Postal Service by a former employee.
( d ) *Federal Claims Collection Standards or FCCS* refers to regulations promulgated by the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury and codified at 31 CFR parts 900 through 904.
( e ) *Former employee* refers to an individual whose employment with the Postal Service has ceased. An employee is considered formally separated from the Postal Service rolls as of close of business on the effective date of his or her separation.
( f ) *General Counsel* refers to the General Counsel of the Postal Service, and includes a designated representative.
( g ) *Hearing Official* refers to an Administrative Law Judge qualified to hear cases under the Administrative Procedure Act, an Administrative Judge appointed under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, or any other qualified person licensed to practice law designated by the Judicial Officer to preside over a hearing conducted pursuant to this part.
( h ) *Judicial Officer* refers to the Judicial Officer, Associate Judicial Officer, or Acting Judicial Officer of the Postal Service.
( i ) *Reconsideration* refers to the review of an alleged debt and/or the proposed offset schedule conducted by the Accounting Service Center at the request of a former employee alleged to be indebted to the Postal Service.
( j ) *Recorder* refers to the Recorder, Judicial Officer Department, United States Postal Service, 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201-3078. The recorder's telephone number is (703) 812-1900, and the Judicial Officer's website is *https://about.usps.com/who/judicial/ .* The fax number is (703) 812-1901.
[77 FR 65104, Oct. 25, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 61022, July 30, 2024; 89 FR 66599, Aug. 16, 2024]
Appendix C.11 - Sample FGP-SCP TB Test Form		 

# Appendix C.11 – Sample TB Test Form

**ABC Foster Grandparent/Senior Companion Program**

Address

Phone:

Email address (or fax number):

*[Note: TB Tests **are not** required byAmeriCorps Seniors but are required by some sponsoring agencies and volunteer stations.]*

**TB Test Form**

Name_____________________________________________   Date of Birth________________

Address____________________________________________ Phone #___________________

             _____________________________________________

A TB test is required to participate in the ABC Foster Grandparent/Senior Companion Program.****If the volunteer has had a positive TB test in the past, please skip this test and complete the next page.

PPD Test Date: ______________________         Date Read: _____________________________   

# of mm induration:          Results/Interpretation: ____________________

**PROVIDER INFORMATION REQUIRED:**

_________________________________________

     Health Professional Signature

_________________________________________

     Hospital/Clinic/Organization Name

_________________________________________

     Date

**IF PREVIOUS POSITIVE RESULTS SKIP TEST AND GO TO THE NEXT PAGE**

**ABC Foster Grandparent/Senior Companion Program**

Address

Phone:

Email address (or fax number):

**Positive Tuberculosis (TB) Test Screening Form**

**Please fill out only if the volunteer has had a POSITIVE TB test in the past.**

Date of Positive Test Results: ___________________

Was a chest X-ray done at that time:     Yes            No

	If yes, was it normal?         	   Yes 	          No

Did volunteer receive anti-TB medication?    Yes          No

	How long did they take it? ________________	

Date of last chest X-ray:______________ What was the result? __________________________

If **POSITIVE** within the last year has volunteer been treated for:

Unusual/persistent cough?          Yes          No

Coughing up blood?                    Yes         No

Shortness of breath?                    Yes         No

Persistent fever/chills?                Yes          No

Night sweats?                              Yes          No

Unexplained weight loss?	     Yes         No

Chronic fatigue?                          Yes         No

Know~~n~~ TB exposure?	   	     Yes         No 

Comments and/or follow-up: ______________________________________________________________________________

Health Professional Signature: ___________________________________Date:_____________

Hospital/Clinic/Organization Name: _______________________________________________

*Version 2020.3		Pg.*2 of 2

This document is provided as a sample ONLY. Its use is optional and, if used, it should be customized as appropriate.*For all appendices, including editable versions of samples and templates, visit**https://www.nationalservice.gov/operations-handbook-appendices.*

# image1.jpeg
###### Editorial Note on Part 96

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

#### § 96.200 Purpose.

This subpart establishes the minimum standards that the safety management system of a company and its U.S. flag vessel(s) must meet for certification to comply with the requirements of 46 U.S.C. 3201-3205 and Chapter IX of SOLAS, 1974. It also permits companies with U.S. flag vessels that are not required to comply with this part to voluntarily develop safety management systems which can be certificated to standards consistent with Chapter IX of SOLAS.
#### MOTOR TRUCKING CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. De GENNARO TRANSPORTATION, INC., CARMEN TRIONE, AND MONARCH FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Essex County Court Law Division

Decided May 3, 1951.

*532
      *Mr. Henry J.*Bendheim, for the plaintiff.

*Messrs. GoxA W albur g (Mr. John A.*Gleeson), for defendant Monarch Eire Insurance Company.

Ooktlon, J. C. C.

The coinplaint is in two counts. In the first count plaintiff alleges the loss of its goods by the default of the defendant, De Gennaro Transportation, Inc., a common carrier, and Carmen Trione, its employee. In the second count plaintiff alleges that defendant, Monarch Eire Insurance Company, issued an indemnity policy in favor of the De Gennaro Transportation, Inc.; that the policy was issued for the benefit of the plaintiff; that an action has accrued thereunder and seeks judgment against the insurance company for the amount of its loss.

The defendant, De Gennaro Transportation, Inc., has filed a cross-complaint against the Monarch Eire Insurance Company under the indemnity policy. The issue between the parties seems to be whether or not the merchandise in question, at the time it was stolen from the De Gennaro truck, was in the possession of the plaintiff or the defendant, the defendant contending that it was not a common carrier since the plaintiff had hired the truck.

The defendant insurance company moves for a severance of the trial as to the first count of the complaint and a separate trial together of the second count and the cross-complaint. It contends that if there be a joint trial its rights will be prejudiced by the revelation to the jury that the De Gennaro Transportation, Inc., is insured.

On the other hand, the plaintiff contends that since the insurance company’s defense is that its policy does not cover the *533loss for the same reason the De Gennaro Transportation, Inc., denies liability, a separate trial might result in requiring the litigation of the factual question twice with the possibility of different results.

The motion is governed by *Buie*3 :42-2 which in effect provides that its disposition is in the discretion of the court, the purpose being to avoid prejudice to any of the parties.

The defendant insurance company contends that it is improperly joined as a party to the action and that the issue, if determinable at all in this action, should be disposed of by the cross-complaint. It is unnecessary to decide that point since I am satisfied that a joint trial of the contingent liability of the insurance company with the main issue would be prejudicial to the rights of both defendants.

An order will be entered directing a separate trial on the first count leaving the issue on the second count and the cross-complaint to be tried later if the plaintiff prevails at the first trial.
§ 320.7 Suspension for advertisements accompanying parcels or periodicals. ( a ) The operation of 39 U.S.C. 601(a) (1) through (6) and § 310.2(b) (1) through (6) of this chapter is suspended on all post routes for advertisements enclosed with merchandise in parcels or accompanying periodicals under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) The advertisements must not be marked with the names or addresses of the intended recipients.
( 2 ) The advertisements must be incidental to the shipment of the merchandise or the periodical. ( i ) An advertisement is incidental to the shipment of the accompanying merchandise or the periodical when the merchandise or the periodical has been ordered by or would otherwise be sent to the recipient even without the accompanying advertisement.
( ii ) Notwithstanding § 320.7(a)(2)(i), an advertisement is not incidental to the merchandise when the pertinent circumstances, such as the nominal value of the merchandise, its shipment on an unsolicited basis, or its status as a sample, reasonably indicate that the shipper's primary purpose is the conveyance of the advertisement itself and that the merchandise is merely an adjunct to the advertisement.
( b ) An item is an advertisement if its primary purpose is to cause or induce the purchase of goods or services from the shipper or others.
[45 FR 59874, Sept. 11, 1980]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, William L.
Walton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William L. WaltonName:
    William L. WaltonDate: May 9, 2005
§ 83.14 Head-on situation (Rule 14). ( a ) Unless otherwise agreed, when two power-driven vessels are meeting on reciprocal or nearly reciprocal courses so as to involve risk of collision each shall alter her course to starboard so that each shall pass on the port side of the other.
( b ) Such a situation shall be deemed to exist when a vessel sees the other ahead or nearly ahead and by night she could see the masthead lights of the other in a line or nearly in a line and/or both sidelights and by day she observes the corresponding aspect of the other vessel.
( c ) When a vessel is in any doubt as to whether such a situation exists she shall assume that it does exist and act accordingly.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this Rule, a power-driven vessel operating on the Great Lakes, Western Rivers, or waters specified by the Secretary, and proceeding downbound with a following current shall have the right-of-way over an upbound vessel, shall propose the manner of passage, and shall initiate the maneuvering signals prescribed by Rule 34(a)(i) (§ 83.34(a)(i)), as appropriate.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.01

                 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-32950, No. 333-45570, No. 333-45572 and No. 333-56270)
pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Non-Plan Stock Option Agreements of Registrant,
Non-Plan Restricted Stock Purchase Agreements of Registrant, 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated
February 5, 2001 except for the third paragraph of note 10, as to which the date
is March 6, 2001, with respect to the financial statements of Snowball.com Inc.,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

Palo Alto, California
March 28, 2001