alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/20/2012 01:20 AM

Subject: Portland Cement NSPS/NESHAP

-- Comments under EO 13563

Hi Keith,

Looking through the latest draft (6 pm timestamp), I had only a couple of questions:

• There’s new language stating “ Requiring that sources retest once a year to

reset the PM CPMS operating limit”

– can you explain why this

change was made? Was it something raised in comments? And for

clarity, is this a new stack test?

• Can you use a plain English substitute for “prima facie”?

Can you address these comments and make changes to the preamble,

if necessary?

Finally, do you anticipate making any other changes to the

preamble? If n ot, can you send the updated clean version and we

can get it uploaded into ROCIS.

Please give me a call if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney
§ 334.510 U.S. Navy Fuel Depot Pier, St. Johns River, Jacksonville, Fla.; restricted area. ( a ) The area is described as: ( 1 ) A line running at 238.5° true and paralleling the pier at 100 feet is extended from the eastern edge of the mooring platform #59 to the western edge of platform #65. From these points the boundaries are extended to the shoreline along lines running at 328.5°.
( 2 ) The easterly waterward coordinate being: 30°23′58.0′′ N 81°37′15.0′′ W
( 3 ) The westerly waterward coordinate being: 30°23′53.0′′ N 81°37′24.4′′ W
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The use of waters as previously described by private and/or commercial floating craft or persons is prohibited with the exception of vessels or persons that have been specifically authorized to do so by the Officer in Charge of the Navy Fuel Depot.
( 2 ) This regulation shall be enforced by the Officer in Charge, U.S. Navy Fuel Depot, Jacksonville, Florida, and such agencies as the officer in charge may designate.
[44 FR 12192, Mar. 6, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 27755, Apr. 24, 1980. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17554, Apr. 10, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THREE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         579,536                 275,893
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,693,381               3,378,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                    80,874                 303,030
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,319,297               4,118,383
<PP&E>                                       3,994,208               3,563,676
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,182,017                 655,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,478,221               7,301,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,148,577               5,656,152
<BONDS>                                        641,808               1,168,506
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,992,268               1,580,607
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,104,783               (694,171)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,478,221               7,301,171
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,301,721               1,486,365
<CGS>                                        2,341,010                 684,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,192,857               1,949,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,076               (518,800)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,088                  13,799
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,195                   4,722
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (281,222)               (628,369)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (66,279)                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (214,943)               (628,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (51,389)               (269,622)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (266,332)               (897,991)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)                  (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)                  (0.16)


</TABLE>
523 P.2d 830

#### Ray K. AUE, Jr., Personal Representative of Jerry Bruce Aue, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jackie Anderson ERICKS, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 11398.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

June 19, 1974.

Rehearing Denied July 10, 1974.

*14Winfred B. Moorer, Moscow, for plaintiff-appellant.

Allen V. Bowles, Moscow, Daniel W. O’Connell, Wynne M. Blake, Lewiston, for defendant-respondent.

BAKES, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court which granted defendant-respondent' Ericks’ motion for summary judgment and awarded her the $12,000 proceeds of a group life insurance policy upon the life of Jerry Bruce Aue, hereinafter decedent. The appellant, Ray K. Aue, Jr., is the father and personal representative of the estate of decedent. Decedent had not lived with his father for several years, and from shortly after Christmas of 1970 until his death in July of 1972 had lived in the home of the respondent Jackie Anderson Ericks. On January 19, 1972, while decedent was then 18 years of age, he became an insured urider a group life insurance policy of his employer, Potlatch Forests, Inc., in the amount of $6,000, together with an accidental death benefit of an additional $6,000. The insurer under the group policy was John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company. On July 25, 1972, decedent was killed in a sawmill accident. At the time of his death, decedent was 19 years of age. Respondent Jackie Anderson Ericks was named beneficiary under the policy. Respondent insurance company paid the $12,000 owing under the policy into the court. The dispute herein is between appellant Ray K. Aue, Jr., and the respondent Jackie Anderson Ericks over the insurance proceeds.

Appellant contends that under I.C. § 41-1807, the deceased could not designate respondent as a beneficiary under the policy because he was a minor, i. e., 18 years of age, at the time the policy was taken out, and that the respondent Mrs. Ericks had no insurable interest in the decedent at the time of his taking out the policy. The trial court found that the decedent was emancipated and therefore *sui juris*and that an emancipated minor was excluded from the limitations imposed by I.C. § 41-1807. However, we need not reach appellant’s contention concerning the trial court’s judgment in view of this Court’s decision in Harrigfeld v. District Court, 95 Idaho 540, 511 P.2d 822 (1973), decided subsequent to the entry of the judgment by the trial court. *Harrigfeld*held that the discrimination between males and females in I.C. § 32-101 concerning the age at which they reach their majority was unconstitutional, and that males reach their majority at age 18, the same as females. As a result of the decision in the *Harrigfeld*case, the decedent, being 18 years of age, was no longer a minor on January 19, 1972, the date on which he became an insured under the group life insurance policy. Therefore, decedent was competent to designate respondent as beneficiary under the policy.

Judgment of the district court is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

SHEPARD, C. J., and DONALDSON, McQUADE and McFADDEN, JJ., concur.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5577

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide for full benefits

for disabled widows and widowers without regard to age.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 2000

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide

for full benefits for disabled widows and widowers without regard to age.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FULL BENEFITS FOR DISABLED WIDOWS AND

4 WIDOWERS WITHOUT REGARD TO AGE.

5 (a) ELIGIBILITY FOR WIDOW’S INSURANCE BENE6 FITS.—Section 202(e) of the Social Security Act (42

7 U.S.C. 402(e)) is amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘has at9 tained age 50 but has not attained age 60 and’’;
2

•HR 5577 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘after at2 taining age 50 if she was entitled before such mar3 riage occurred’’ and inserting ‘‘after having been en4 titled’’; and

5 (3) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ‘‘after at6 taining age 50’’.

7 (b) ELIGIBILITY FOR WIDOWER’S INSURANCE BENE8 FITS.—Section 202(f) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(f)) is

9 amended—

10 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘has at11 tained age 50 but has not attained age 60 and’’;

12 (2) in paragraph (4)(A), by striking ‘‘after at13 taining age 50 if he was entitled before such mar14 riage occurred’’ and inserting ‘‘after having been en15 titled’’; and

16 (3) in paragraph (4)(B), by striking ‘‘after at17 taining age 50’’.

18 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM REDUCTIONS IN BENEFITS.

19 Section 202(q) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

20 402(q)) is amended—

21 (1) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘age 50’’

22 and inserting ‘‘age 60’’; and

23 (2) by adding at the end the following new

24 paragraph:
3

•HR 5577 IH

1 ‘‘(12) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

2 section, there shall be no reduction under this subsection

3 in the widow’s or widower’s insurance benefit of an indi4 vidual for any month in which such individual is under

5 a disability (as defined in section 223(d)); and none of

6 the provisions of this subsection shall apply with respect

7 to such benefit even though such benefit may have been

8 so reduced prior to the onset of such disability.’’.

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND REDETERMINATION OF BEN10 EFITS.

11 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

12 respect to monthly insurance benefits payable under title

13 II of the Social Security Act for months after the month

14 in which this Act is enacted. The Commissioner of Social

15 Security (without the necessity of any application there16 for) shall redetermine the amount of any widow’s or wid17 ower’s insurance benefit which is payable for the month

18 in which this Act is enacted in order to reflect such

19 amendments as provided in the preceding sentence.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|                       | /s/ Jeffrey D. Serkes                        |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|  

Date. May  8, 2006 | Jeffrey D. SerkesPrincipal Financial Officer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration 

          - [Docket No. 99N-4166] 

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

JonnaLynn P. Capezutto, Office of Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 1, 1999 (64 FR 53392), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0303. The approval expires on May 31, 2003. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.                 

      ( print page 38290)    
Dated: June 14, 2000. 

William K. Hubbard, 

Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation. 

[FR Doc. 00-15432 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before STEPHENS , DEERWESTER , and BONNER Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Alex C. SANDOVAL Lance Corporal (E

- 3 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 20 2000216

Decided: 31 March 2021 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Stephen F. Keane

Senten ce adjudged 24 June 2020 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona c onsisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, hard labor without confinement for 60 days, restriction to the limits of the Marine Wing Support Squadron 371 barracks for 60 days, confinement for 3 months , forfeiture of $ 1,120 .00 pay per month for 10 months , and a bad

- conduct discharge. 1 For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Berry, USMCR

1 The convening a uthority suspended hard labor and restriction for 60 days if immediate placement on appellate leave could be executed upon Appellant’s release from confinement.United States v. Sandoval , NMCCA No. 202000216 Opinion of the Court

2 For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
§ 102-36.190 Must we always pay 25 percent of the original acquisition cost when furnishing excess personal property to project grantees? No, you may acquire excess personal property for use by a project grantee without paying the 25 percent fee when any of the following conditions apply: ( a ) The personal property was originally acquired from excess sources by your agency and has been placed into official use by your agency for at least one year. The federal government retains title to such property.
( b ) The property is furnished under section 203 of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944 (16 U.S.C. 580a) through the U.S. Forest Service in connection with cooperative state forest fire control programs. The federal government retains title to such property.
( c ) The property is furnished by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to state or county extension services or agricultural research cooperatives under 40 U.S.C. 483(d)(2)(E). The federal government retains title to such property.
( d ) The property is not needed for donation under part 102-37 of this chapter, and is transferred under section 608 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2358). Title to such property transfers to the grantee. (You need not wait until after the donation screening period when furnishing excess personal property to recipients under the Agency for International Development (AID) Development Loan Program.)
( e ) The property is scientific equipment transferred under section 11(e) of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Act of 1950, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1870(e)). GSA will limit such transfers to property within Federal Supply Classification (FSC) groups 12, 14, 43, 48, 58, 59, 65, 66, 67, 68 and 70. GSA may approve transfers without reimbursement for property under other FSC groups when NSF certifies the item is a component of or related to a piece of scientific equipment or is a difficult-to-acquire item needed for scientific research. Regardless of FSC, GSA will not approve transfers of common-use or general-purpose items without reimbursement. Title to such property transfers to the grantee.
( f ) The property is furnished in connection with grants to Indian tribes, as defined in section 3(c) of the Indian Financing Act (24 U.S.C. 1452(c)). Title passage is determined under the authorities of the administering agency.
[65 FR 31218, May 16, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 53572, Sept. 12, 2006]
Exhibit









Amendment to Offer Letter


January 10, 2019


Joe DuFresne, 
I am pleased to confirm the following amendments to your original Offer Letter dated November 14, 2017.
The following are the amended terms and conditions effective December 13, 2018:
CURRENT BASE SALARY:    $175,000
NEW BASE SALARY:        $185,000 (effective 1/1/2019)


		
	SEVERANCE:
	You will also be eligible (i) severance equal to 12 months base salary upon a termination without cause; or (ii) severance equal to 12 months base salary plus target bonus (as if met 100% of target bonus objectives) for a termination without Cause in connection with a Change of Control (as defined in the 2017 Internap Corporation 2017 Stock Incentive Plan).  “Cause” means the occurrence of any of the following: (i) the willful and continued failure by you to substantially perform your material duties to the Company (ii) your willful and continued failure to substantially follow and comply with such specific and lawful directives of the Company that are not inconsistent with your position (iii) you have been convicted of, or pleaded nolo contendere to a felony involving moral turpitude, (iv) you have engaged in fraud against the Company or misappropriated Company property or the property of the Company’s Affiliates (other than incidental property) resulting in a material economic or financial injury to the Company or any Affiliate; (v) you materially breach any Company policy, which breach causes (A) financial to the Company or (B) real or potential reputational harm to the Company.


You will continue to be bound by INAP’s terms and conditions including the restrictive covenants previously outlined in your offer agreement, dated November 14, 2017, unless otherwise, previously revised by the Compensation Committee and the Company. 


/s/ Joseph DuFresne                    /s/ Peter Aquino
Joseph DuFresne                    Peter Aquino
Vice President of Corporate Development        President & CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,173,752
<SECURITIES>                                28,154,682
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,448,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,030,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,111,280
<PP&E>                                      17,404,334
<DEPRECIATION>                             (9,742,918)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,757,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,227,547
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,537,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,156,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,757,519
<SALES>                                     26,363,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,363,056
<CGS>                                       17,193,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,193,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,485,298
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,197,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,447,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,750,917
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,750,917
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.05
        

</TABLE>