alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 302.2 Definitions.

*Base year.* The term “base year” means the completed calendar year immediately preceding the beginning of the benefit year.

*Benefit year.* The term “benefit year” means the 12-month period beginning July 1 of any year and ending June 30 of the next year. If a registration period begins in June and ends in July, the benefit year ending date is deemed to be the last day of such registration period. If an employee is eligible for payment of extended benefits, the benefit year ending date for such employee will be June 30, or the last day of his or her extended benefit period, whichever date is later.

*Compensation.* The term “compensation” means generally any form of earnings or money remuneration earned on the basis of railroad employment during any month, excluding any amount in excess of the monthly compensation base for that month and also excluding payments of the character described in [§ 302.4 of this part](/on/2024-09-20/title-20/part-302/section-302.4).

*Monthly compensation base.* The term “monthly compensation base” means the greater of $600, or the amount calculated using the following formula:

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC14NO91.108/EC14NO91.108_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC14NO91.108/EC14NO91.108_original_size.png)

For the purpose of this formula, “MCB” is the dollar amount of the monthly compensation base, and “A” is the amount of the Tier I tax base under section 3231(e)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code for the calendar year for which the monthly compensation base is being computed. If the dollar amount computed under this formula is not a multiple of $5, it shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $5. If the dollar amount computed is equidistant between two multiples of $5, it shall be rounded up the nearest multiple of $5.

*Registration period.* With respect to unemployment benefits, the term “registration period” has the meaning given in [§ 325.1(c) of this chapter](/on/2024-09-20/title-20/section-325.1#p-325.1(c)). With respect to sickness benefits, the term “registration period” has the meaning given in [§ 335.1(d) of this chapter](/on/2024-09-20/title-20/section-335.1#p-335.1(d)).

[[56 FR 6966](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/56-FR-6966), Feb. 21, 1991; [56 FR 10302](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/56-FR-10302), Mar. 11, 1991]
#### § 102-118.600 When a TSP disagrees with a Notice of Overcharge resulting from a postpayment audit, what are the appeal procedures?

A TSP who disagrees with the Notice of Overcharge may submit a written request for reconsideration to the GSA Transportation Audits Division at: General Services Administration, Office of Travel, Employee Relocation and Transportation, Attn: Transportation Audits Division, 1800 F Street NW, 3rd Floor, Mail Hub 3400, Washington, DC 20405; or via email to *audits.policy@gsa.gov.*

[87 FR 32326, May 31, 2022]
#### § 102-117.360 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Robert W. Humphreys, the Chief Executive Officer of Delta Apparel, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedJuly 2, 2011of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:September 1, 2011/s/ Deborah H. MerrillDeborah H. MerrillVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Delta Apparel, Inc. and will be retained by Delta Apparel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 3006.101 Commission policy. ( a ) The Commission shall be proactive and timely in identifying and posting public records and other frequently requested records to its website.
( b ) It is the stated policy of the Commission that FOIA requests shall be administered with a clear presumption of openness. The Commission will only withhold information if it reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption, such as information specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (for example 39 U.S.C. 410(c)), or disclosure is otherwise prohibited by law. Publicly available information regarding exemptions and examples of exempt information are available at the Department of Justice's FOIA website, *https://www.foia.gov .*
( c ) This Commission policy does not create any right enforceable in court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          33,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  249,992<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       2,472,419
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,116,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,862,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,059,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     643,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,862,003
<SALES>                                        108,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               788,792
<CGS>                                           61,654
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  580,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,350
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,005
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,138)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    64,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.44
<FN>
<F1>THE VALUE FOR RECEIVABLES REPRESENTS THEIR AMOUNT NET OF THEIR ALLOWANCES.
<F2>AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET EXISTS IN THE REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM   Document 17   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/06/2023   Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that The Moskowitz Law Firm PLLC, counsel for plaintiffs in 

the above-entitled action, has changed its mailing address. The new address is:

The Moskowitz Law Firm, PLLC

Continental Plaza

3250 Mary Street

Suite 202

Miami, FL 33133

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 653409

Miami, FL 33175

Dated: June 1, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

By: //s/ Barbara C. Lewis

Barbara C. Lewis

Florida Bar No. 118114

The Moskowitz Law Firm, PLLC

Continental Plaza

3250 Mary Street, Suite 202

Miami, FL 33133

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 653409

Miami, FL 33175

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 1, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, by using the 

CM/ECF system, which will serve a copy of same on all counsel of record.

By: /s/ Barbara C. Lewis

Barbara C. Lewis

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3040.150 General.

Users of the mail, by filing a request with the Commission, may propose a modification to the market dominant product list or the competitive product list. For purposes of this part, modification shall be defined as adding a product to a list, removing a product from a list, or transferring a product from one list to the other list.

[81 FR 38957, June 15, 2016. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
§ 334.1280 Bristol Bay, Alaska; air-to-air weapon range, Alaskan Air Command, U.S. Air Force. ( a ) *The danger zone.* An area in Bristol Bay beginning at latitude 58°24′ N., longitude 159°10′ W.; thence to latitude 57°58′ N., longitude 158°30′ W.; thence to latitude 57°07′ N., longitude 160°20′ W.; thence to latitude 58°02′ N., longitude 161°40′ W.; and thence to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Intermittent firing will be conducted over two to three day periods about 2 hours a day between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. during the months of May through August.
( 2 ) The fact that practice firing is to take place over the designated area shall be advertised to the public 72 hours in advance through the usual media for the dissemination of such information. Notice to the U.S. Coast Guard and NOTAM shall be issued at least 48 hours before firing is to be conducted on the range. Information as to the dates, time, and characteristics of the firing shall be advertised in advance of each session of firing.
( 3 ) Prior to conducting each practice firing, the danger zone shall be patrolled by aircraft to note the location of all vessels within the area. The practice firing exercise shall be conducted in the portion of the danger zone not occupied by surface craft.
( 4 ) This section shall be enforced by the Commander, Alaskan Air Command, U.S. Air Force, Seattle, Washington, or such agencies as he may designate.
[29 FR 5947, May 6, 1964, as amended at 36 FR 6422, Apr. 3, 1971. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 99.2


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary B. Horton, Treasurer of AMERCO, certify that:

1.   the Quarterly Report of AMERCO on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period
     ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
     the date hereof (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AMERCO.


                                   /s/ GARY B. HORTON
                                   -------------------
                                    Gary B. Horton
                                    Treasurer
                                    September 26, 2002
#### § 102-37.350 Does coverage under the single audit process in OMB Circular A-133 exempt a SASP from other reviews of its program?

No, although SASPs are covered under the single audit process in OMB Circular A-133, from time to time the Government Accountability Office (GAO), GSA, or other authorized Federal activities may audit or review the operations of a SASP. GSA will notify the chief executive officer of the State of the reasons for a GSA audit. When requested, you must make available financial records and all other records of the SASP for inspection by representatives of GSA, GAO, or other authorized Federal activities.

[67 FR 2584, Jan. 18, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 23868, Apr. 25, 2006]
Appendix B.7 - Sample Volunteer Information Update Form
Appendix 7:  SAMPLE FORM

Projects are encouraged to customize as appropriate.

All project forms should comply with Senior Corps requirements as well as grantee policies.

# Appendix B.7 – Sample Volunteer Information Update Form 

*[Enter new or changed information and attach to volunteer registration]*

**AmeriCorps Seniors Volunteer Information Update**

[Project Name]: 

1. Name: __________________________________________________________________

Address: _________________________________________________________________

City: _______________________ Zip: ________ Telephone: ______________________

Email: __________________________________________________________________

2. Name of Beneficiary: ______________________________________________________

Relationship: ____________________________ Telephone: _______________________

Address: _________________________________________________________________

City: ___________________________ State: ________ Zip: _______________________

3. Change in station assignment or volunteer assignment:  ___________________________

________________________________________________________________________

4. Other changes:

Current Information:

Changes to: 

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Volunteer Signature: _____________________________	Date: _________________________

Staff Notes: 

________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________

Staff Initials: _____________________________	Date: _________________________

*Version 2020.3										Pg.*1 of 1This document is provided as a sample ONLY. Its use is optional and, if used, it should be customized as appropriate. *For all appendices, including editable versions of samples and templates, visit**https://www.nationalservice.gov/operations-handbook-appendices.*

# image1.jpeg
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William S. Ayer, Chairman,
President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge,

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|   |  |                                               |  | 
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By |  | /S/ William S. Ayer                           |  | 
|   |  | William S. Ayer                               |  | 
|   |  | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|   |  | May 14, 2007                                  |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No._______________________

CLERK’S NOTICE OF FILING DEFICIENCY

The Clerk’s Office has received the document(s) submitted in the above referenced case. The 

document(s) do not comply with the requirements of the Local Rules, CM/ECF Administrative 

Procedures, or the Federal Rules. The documents have been accepted for filing; however, please 

note the deficiencies noted below. 

☐ Document(s) were filed conventionally that should have been filed electronically (see 

CM/ECF Administrative Procedures). 

☐ Document(s) missing required signature(s) (Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a); Fed.R.Cr.P 49(d)). 

☐ Translation not provided for documents written in foreign language (See CM/ECF 

Administrative Procedures). 

☐ Civil Cover Sheet not filed pursuant to Local Rule 3.3.

☐ Motion for Appearance Pro Hac Vice was not filed with the required fee of $_______ 

($75.00 per attorney per case), pursuant to Special Rules Governing the Admission 

and Practice of Attorneys, Local Rule 4(b). Please submit the required fee.

☐ Case was not filed with required filing fee of $__________ (civil cases:$400.00; memo 

cases: $46.00; habeas cases: $5.00) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914 (a), and the CM/ECF 

Administrative Procedures. Summons(es) will not be issued until the filing fee is paid or 

an order granting the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is entered.

☐ Pursuant to Administrative Order 2014-86, parties applying for a writ of garnishment 

should no longer pay $100 into the Court registry and instead make that payment to the 

garnishee upon demand under amended section 77.28, Florida Statutes. The $100 

payment is being returned via U.S. Mail. 

Date: ___________________

ANGELA E. NOBLE

Court Administrator • Clerk of Court 

By: ___________________________ 

Deputy Clerk 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38573-38574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in

[[Page 38574]]

United States v. Cotter Corporation, C.A. No. 00-WM-1076 (D. Col.), was 
lodged on May 25, 2000, with the United States District Court for the 
District of Colorado. The consent decree resolves the United States' 
claims against the Cotter Corporation with respect to past response 
costs incurred, pursuant to section 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607, 
in connection with the clean-up of the Lincoln Park Site. The Site is 
located near Canon City, Fremont, Colorado. Under the consent decree, 
defendant Cotter Corporation will pay the United States $52,500 in 
reimbursement of past response costs incurred in connection with the 
Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department 
of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United States v. 
Cotter Corporation, DOJ Reference No. 90-11-3-305-A.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1200, Denver, 
Colorado; and the Region VIII Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 999 18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado. A copy of the 
proposed decree may be obtained by mail from the Department of Justice 
Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044. In 
requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $5.25 (.25 cents per page production costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 00-15592 Filed 6-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### PUTNAM *v.*LAWRENCE.

*Petition for New Trial. Abatement.*

A petition for new trial served one day before dismissal of a former petition in tlie same court for the same cause, was dismissed on motion, the concurrent pendency of the two petitions being fatal to the latter.

Petition for a new trial. The original cause was tried at the September Term, 1874, the trial beginning on October 2d, and the testimony closing October 6th. The court adjourned on November 23d, and judgment was rendered as of that day. The petitioner thereupon brought a petition like the present one, and for the same cause, which was heard and dismissed at the General Term, 1876, the court adjourning on November 23. On November 22, one day before that adjournment, this petition was served on the petitionee. At the present term the petitionee moved to dismiss the petition, for that the petition was not brought within two years next after rendition of judgment in the original cause; and for that the first named petition was pending at the time of the bringing and serving of this petition.

--, for the petitioner.

*J. 0. Livingston*and *J. A. Wing,*for the petitionee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Barrett, J.

This cause stands upon a motion to dismiss a petition for a new trial. The petition was served on Lawrence on *67the 22d day of November 1876. Putnam had brought a like petition for the same cause, which was dismissed at the General Term of the Supreme Court, which adjourned on the 23d day of November, 1876. The motion to dismiss in the present case is sustained on the second ground assigned in the motion. It falls within the views expressed in *Mann*v. *Fairlee,*44 Vt. 678, and in *Shepard*v. *Hayes,*16 Vt. 486. We think those views sound in principle and salutary in application. Though in this case the concurrent pendency of the two petitions was brief, still, according to the calendar, both secular and legal, the later petition was pending for a day while the other was still pending. That fact is fatal to the latter.

The petition is dismissed with costs.
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

:t01()-NM-Ief(,-AD

Docket No. FAA- 20 I 0- otl 5""B Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA b,3S this AD action been discussed (i.e.,Design Approval ~o)der.

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA. AOPA, ALPA, GAMA" ete)? (YOIl mighr lIefd"i'p SUbp,il a.separare

~ecord lQ ,he Rilles Docker The.AD MaJUJa~defines

.

"Ex Pcvr.eCO~tacts. "] ~ . ~. i" -,

.

;,._-~: . ~t,-~

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE

ATA Mr. Mark Lopez 02112110 CODCur.

Boeing: Mr. William Kurnmert 02/03/10 Concur.

I

Other/Additional Information: