alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"agency":"CNCS","generated":"2021-04-29 19:10:11","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2021"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"5"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CNCS"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["13"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["11"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["16"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2021","quarter":"Q2"}
On appellant’s motion for reconsideration filed March 21,

reconsideration allowed; decision (133 Or App 448, 890 P2d 1016) vacated;

affirmed September 13, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JEFF DARL ISBERG, *Appellant.*

(DA482312-9212; CA A82779)

902 P2d 136

Alan H. Biedermann, Deputy Public Defender, for motion.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; decision vacated; affirmed. *State v. Flowers,*136 Or App 555, 902 P2d 624 (1995).
#### § 101-28.306-6 Sensitive items.

Many items stocked by the CSCs may be considered sensitive based upon standard criteria factors such as propensity for personal use, the potential for embarrassment of GSA and customer agencies, the level of customer complaints, and control as an accountable item of personal property. Each customer activity shall take all appropriate measures necessary to ensure that all items are properly controlled within its activity and are purchased solely for official Government use.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 3, 2017

t0925 

# Order

Clerk October 3, 2017

154485

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154485

COA: 332688

Lenawee CC: 14

- 017315

- FC

FELIPE ANZAUALDA PEREZ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of January 31, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the June 7, 2016

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the d ecisions in People v

Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos. 152946

- 8). On

order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 24, 2017, 500 Mich ___ (2017),

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 775.10 Environmental assessments. ( a ) An environmental assessment must contain: ( 1 ) A summary of major considerations and conclusions,
( 2 ) A description of the proposed action,
( 3 ) For each reasonable alternative, a description of the affected environment, the environmental consequences, the mitigation measures, if any, and a comparison to all alternatives considered.
( 4 ) A list of applicable environmental permits necessary to complete the proposed action.
( b ) Those preparing an environmental assessment must solicit information and views from Federal, State, and local agencies and, where there is a substantial likelihood of significant effects on the environment, the public. All responsible views and information must be considered.
[44 FR 63525, Nov. 5, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 63 FR 45719, 45722, Aug. 27, 1998]
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 9
EPA SANITIZED
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 9
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 9
~3bnr\ D. WAViom^

Tilc.TS-XD.No.ilooXbft

<£M)M v(ri.£n.5<4

*Ht*. CcxSt Numbers:

Sd^%3L0\5

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court ofAggg^y District

CATHY S. LUSK, C

ia.-u-ttrtv eft

X\ Vsas Wtn VaujjrA \o toy cAknUon W^ VW:> CcuA \l\a\ \\ \M4\\

C_as\ a \o\cA c? *&q&.oo Vor Onv^ Y/,cA WnscAa\. XcAso \Naf> \oU \WA x Cc^AA pur-dna^e. Onq of \\u Fvr-b\ 5ofraqt<b aV a.

rtK<* &V StfTW rpc^L.W £>o \Wn XUcu\d \\lt Vo ^W*t

VW Video SufVfcYuonu. W^ Ond £<Wl da^e, of d\l Vne. blftftn

Wotln VW. exWnfcouS ofrenS<L\nvok/'.nG Wt\LuSkA\ai\LX Vtouid

JVu Cos\ AAWst documents WcA X'm rtQutsVynq &o\UtA Xtltiu

ThanK^cu

Eiif^cercl

Ltfm.fi
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 168-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

COLLECTIVE ACTION

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC AND ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

/

CONSENT TO JOIN PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. §216(b)

1. My name is Sydney Mull .

2. I consent, agree, and opt to become a Plaintiff in this lawsuit brought under the 

FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., against my current/former employer, 450 North River Drive, LLC, 

d/b/a Kiki on the River, and alleged employers RJ River, LLC, and Roman Jones (collectively 

“Defendants”).

3. I wish to assert a claim for alleged unpaid/underpaid tips against Kiki on the River 

and the other Defendants for the tips I allege I’m owed.

4. I agree to be bound by any adjudication of this action by the Court, whether it is 

favorable or unfavorable. I further agree to be bound by any collective action settlement herein 

that is recommended by FairLaw Firm, approved by the Class Representative, and approved by 

the Court as fair and reasonable.

5. I designate the FairLaw Firm to represent me in this case.

Sydney Mull

Sydney Mull (Aug 19, 2023 17:46 EDT)

Printed Name: Sydney Mull

Your Address, Email, and Telephone Are Needed, But Will Not Filed With The Court

Address: 218 NW 8th St Miami, FL 33136 Tel No.: 6105686086

Email: sydneymullmodeling@gmail.com

MAIL, EMAIL, OR FAX YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO:

FairLaw Firm

135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33156 / brian@fairlawattorney.com

TEL 305.230.4884 TEXT 786.386.0885 FAX 305.230.4844 

Dated Aug 19, 2023 , 2023. Signed:

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 192-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2023 Page 1 of 1
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Hourly Earnings Index, 1964-August 1975

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	Heflin, Charles R. 						*Hourly Earnings Index, 1964-August 1975 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1897*,												Washington, D.C: 								The Bureau, 										1976,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4740,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 99.10

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                  SUNBEAM CORPORATION COMMENTS ON DISTRIBUTION
                             OF SHARES BY STEINHARDT

         Fort Lauderdale, FL, (September 18, 1996) -- Sunbeam Corporation
(NYSE:SOC) commented on today's announcement by the Steinhardt funds that they
are distributing to their investors the shares of Sunbeam common stock formerly
held by the funds. Sunbeam noted that the distribution is pursuant to
Steinhardt's plans, announced in October, 1995, to wind down all its funds and
to distribute substantially all of the assets in the funds to the investors by
the end of 1996.
         Albert Dunlap, Sunbeam's Chairman and CEO, stated: "We welcome to the
Sunbeam shareholder family the individual and institutional investors who
previously were 'indirect' investors in Sunbeam through the Steinhardt funds. We
look forward to these investors continuing to share in the revitalization of
Sunbeam as we work to increase shareholder value."
         Sunbeam also announced that, in light of the
distribution-in-kind of the shares by Steinhardt, Shimon Topor, who has served
as Steinhardt's representative on Sunbeam's Board of Directors, has resigned
from the Board. A replacement for Mr. Topor will be named shortly.
         Sunbeam Corporation is a leading consumer products company that
designs, manufactures and markets, nationally and internationally, a diverse
portfolio of outdoor and household brand name products. The Company's Sunbeam(R)
and Oster(R) brands have been household names for generations, both domestically
and abroad, and the Company is a market leader in many of its product
categories.

         Contact:          Media:                   Investor Relations:
                           Pete Judice              John DeSimone
                           New York                 SUNBEAM CORPORATION
                           (212) 614-4506           (954) 767-2100
#### § 102-118.255 Are GBL and GTR forms numbered and used sequentially?

Yes, GBL and GTR forms are always sequentially numbered when printed and/or used. No other numbering of the forms, including additions or changes to the prefixes or additions of suffixes, is permitted.
#### § 102-33.255 Must we document FSCAP or life-limited parts installed on aircraft that we will report as excess or replace?

Yes, you must comply with the documentation procedures described in § 102-33.370 if your aircraft and/or engines contain FSCAP or life-limited parts that you will report as excess or replace.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Teliphone Corp., (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
      Metrakos, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




TELIPHONE
        CORP.
 By:
                    /s/ George MetrakosGeorge
                    MetrakosPrincipal
                    Financial OfficerJanuary
                    10, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.10-20 Sound signal tests. ( a ) Sound signal tests must: ( 1 ) Be made by the applicant in the presence of a Coast Guard representative, who certifies the test if the procedures comply with the requirements of this section;
( 2 ) Be made with Coast Guard supplied and calibrated sound level meters and power meters; and
( 3 ) Be made in an anechoic chamber large enough to accommodate the entire sound signal, as if installed for actual use.
( b ) The sound pressure level must be measured as a function of: ( 1 ) Distance by using a sufficient number of points to allow a far-field extrapolation of the sound pressure level;
( 2 ) Power at outputs up to and including the approximate power level necessary to comply with § 67.10-1(c);
( 3 ) Horizontal angle at increments not greater than 30°; and
( 4 ) Harmonic content to at least the third harmonic.
( c ) In analyzing the test data to determine the minimum power necessary to produce the sound pressure level specified in Table A of this section the Coast Guard follows the procedures prescribed by the International Association of Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) in Supplement No. 3 to the IALA Bulletin of February 1969 for analysis of harmonic components and does not consider components above 1,100 Hertz as adding to the audible range.
**EXHIBIT32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

**In connection with this annualreport of ML Select Futures I L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Benjamin C. Weston, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC,the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: March 30, 2007                  |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |   |
| By                                    | /s/ Benjamin C. Weston |   |
| Benjamin C. Weston                    |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                                       |  |  |  |

 

----
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Kimberly Valle) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Kimberly Valle.

Dated this 4th day of August 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 182 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-3.105 What are the responsibilities of an agency head? When a committee is utilized by or established by an agency, the agency head must: ( a ) Comply with the Act, this part, and other applicable laws and regulations;
( b ) Issue administrative guidelines and management controls providing the details that advisory committee staff need to implement during the creation, operation, and termination of their Federal advisory committees;
( c ) Designate a CMO;
( d ) Designate a DFO for each advisory committee and its subcommittees;
( e ) Approve the advisory committee charters for establishments, renewals, re-establishments, or mergers;
( f ) Provide a written determination stating the reasons for closing any advisory committee meeting to the public, in whole or in part, in accordance with the exemptions set forth in the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c);
( g ) Review, at least annually, the need to continue each existing advisory committee, consistent with the public interest and the purpose or functions of each advisory committee;
( h ) Determine that rates of compensation for members (if they are paid for their services) and staff of, and experts and consultants to advisory committees are justified and that levels of agency support are adequate;
( i ) Develop procedures to assure that the advice or recommendations of advisory committees will not be inappropriately influenced by the appointing authority or by any special interest, but will instead be the result of the advisory committee's independent judgment;
( j ) Assure that the interests and affiliations of committee members are reviewed for conformance with applicable conflict of interest statutes, regulations issued by the U.S. Office of Government Ethics including any supplemental agency requirements, and other Federal ethics rules;
( k ) Appoint or invite individuals to serve on committees, unless otherwise provided for by a specific statute or Presidential directive; and
( l ) Provide the opportunity for reasonable participation, including accessibility considerations, by the public in advisory committee activities, subject to § 102-3.140 and the agency's guidelines.
Grafton

No. 79-025

#### Eugene C. Struckhoff, III and Lawrence A. Kelly v. William A. Baker and Ridler W. Page d/b/a Baker & Page

May 23, 1979

*Orr & Reno,*of Concord *(Ronald L. Snow,*by brief), for plaintiffs.

*Baker & Page,*of Lebanon *(Ridler W. Page,*by brief), for defendants.

Memorandum Opinion

This is an equity proceeding arising out of the dissolution of a law partnership. The matter was heard by a Master *(E. Paul Kelly,*Esq.), who ruled favorably to the plaintiffs and his orders were approved by the trial court. The defendants filed a motion to set aside the verdict. The motion was denied on August 1, 1978. Defendants then filed a proposed reserved case with the clerk of the Grafton County Superior Court on September 5, 1978, contrary to the time limitations of Superior Court Rule 74. The Trial Court *(Johnson,*J.) denied the reserved case under the authority of *R. J. Berke & Co., Inc. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc.,*118 N.H. 449, 388 A.2d 1260 (1978), because of a failure to appeal in a timely manner. The court correctly applied the rule of that case. Double costs, but not attorney’s fees, are awarded to plaintiffs pursuant to RSA 490:14-a (Supp. 1977). See *Wright v. Wright,*119 N.H. 102, 398 A.2d 837 (1979).

*Exceptions overruled.*
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Todd Parker, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:June 20, 2006     By:  /S/ Todd Parker    Todd Parker    Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-Chief Financial Officer