alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5110

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 18 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Received

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 3470

12th Street in Riverside, California, as the ‘‘George E.

Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 5110 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 3470 12th

3 Street in Riverside, California, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘George E. Brown, Jr. United States

5 Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘George E. Brown, Jr. United

11 States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 17,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### § 102-2.120 How do I know whom to contact to discuss the regulatory requirements of programs addressed in the FMR?

Periodically, GSA will issue for your reference an FMR bulletin that lists program contacts with whom agencies can discuss regulatory requirements. At a minimum, the list will contain organization names and telephone numbers for each program addressed in the FMR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-20340-CR-WILLIAMS(s)

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 

MASPHAL KRY, 

 Defendant. / 

GOVERNMENT=S TENTATIVE WITNESS LIST

 The United States hereby files its list of witnesses likely to be called to testify at the 

trial of this Matter:

In person: 

Custodian- Apple S/A Darren Flinn Nancy Foley 

Augustín Fuentes, PhD S/A Fernando Gattorno Custodian – Google 

W.I. Sara Greenwood W.I. Eva Lara RAC Dorothy Manera 

S/A Katherine McCabe S/A James Podboy S/A William Stull

George Volentir Veng LimYeung W.I. Eva Lara

W.I.A. John Hoke S/A Scott Allee S/A Alfred Colby 

By deposition: 

Ms. San Sovannary Vich Soveach, Esq. Chheav Sopheaktra 

 Respectfully submitted,

MARKENZY LAPOINTE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: Thomas A. Watts-FitzGerald By: Emily R. Stone 

Assistant United States Attorney Assistant United States Attorney

Fla. Bar No. 0273538 Fla. Bar No. 92077 

 99 N.E. 4th Street - 4TH Floor 99 N.E. 4th Street - 7TH Floor 

Miami, Florida 33132 Miami, Florida 33132

Telephone: (305) 961-9413 Telephone: (305) 961-9407 

Case 1:22-cr-20340-KMW Document 244-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/19/2024 Page 1 of 1
§ 6.7 Notation voting. ( a ) *General.* Notation voting consists of the circulation of physical or electronic written memoranda and voting sheets to each member of the Board simultaneously and the tabulation of submitted responses. Notation voting may be used only for routine, non-controversial, or administrative matters.
( b ) *Administrative Responsibility.* The Secretary of the Board is responsible for: ( 1 ) Distributing notation voting memoranda and voting sheets;
( 2 ) Establishing deadlines for notation voting sheets to be completed and returned;
( 3 ) Processing and tabulating all notation voting sheets; and
( 4 ) Determining whether further action is required.
( c ) *Veto of notation voting.* In view of the public policy for openness reflected in the Government in the Sunshine Act and in these bylaws, each Board member is authorized to veto the use of notation voting for the consideration of any matter. If a Board member vetoes the use of notation voting, the Secretary must notify all members of such action, and must promptly take action to place the particular matter on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled Board meeting following the date of the veto, or to schedule a teleconference to consider the matter, as appropriate.
( d ) *Disclosure of result.* The Secretary shall maintain all records pertaining to Board actions taken pursuant to the notation voting process, and shall make such records available for public inspection, consistent with the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552.
[77 FR 17334, Mar. 26, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 10014, Feb. 18, 2021]
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of WithumSmith + Brown, PC**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-153350, 333-14871, 333-47736, 333-90088 and 333-134195)pertaining to the GoAmerica Communications Corp. 1999 Stock Option Plan, the GoAmerica, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan, the GoAmerica, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the GoAmerica, Inc. 2005 Equity Compensation Plan of our report dated March 28,2008, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Purple Communications, Inc., for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC 

NewBrunswick, New Jersey 

March 31, 2009
#### § 102-118.91 May my agency authorize the use of cash?

Yes, in limited circumstances, a Government employee can use cash where government payment mechanisms are not available or acceptable.

[69 FR 57618, Sept. 24, 2004]
#### § 101-27.206 Procurement of shelf-life materials.
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-80182-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RIGOBERTO MARTINEZ-FLORES,

Defendant.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation entered by 

Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart Following Change of Plea Hearing [ECF No. 17]. On January

12, 2023, Magistrate Judge Reinhart held a Change of Plea hearing [ECF No. 15] during which 

Defendant pled guilty to the sole count of the Indictment [ECF No. 8]. The Government orally 

proffered a factual basis for the plea on the record, and Defendant acknowledged that the facts 

proffered were true and correct. Magistrate Judge Reinhart thereafter issued a Report 

recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to the sole count of the Indictment, 

that the Court find Defendant to have freely and voluntarily entered his guilty plea, and that the 

Court adjudicate him guilty of the Indictment [ECF No. 8]. No party has filed objections to the 

Report, and the time to do so has expired. 

The Court has conducted a review of the record and finds no error in the Report. Therefore, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 17] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The guilty plea entered into by Defendant Rigoberto Martinez-Flores as to the sole 

Case 9:22-cr-80182-AMC Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-80182-CR-CANNON

count of the Indictment is ACCEPTED.

3. Defendant Rigoberto Martinez-Flores is adjudicated guilty of the sole count of the

Indictment, which charges him with illegal reentry after deportation or removal, in 

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1) [ECF No. 8]. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 31st day of January

2023.

________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cr-80182-AMC Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 262.5 Systems (Privacy). ( a ) *Privacy Act system of records.* A Postal Service system containing information about individuals, including mailing lists, from which information is retrieved by the name of an individual or by some identifying number or symbol assigned to the individual, such as a Social Security Account Number.
( b ) *Individual (record subject).* A living person. Does not include sole proprietorships, partnerships or corporations. A business firm identified by the name of one or more persons is not an individual.
( c ) *Computer matching program.* A “matching program,” as defined in the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(8), is subject to the matching provisions of the Act, published guidance of the Office of Management and Budget, and these regulations. The term “matching program” includes any computerized comparison of: ( 1 ) A Postal Service automated system of records with an automated system of records of another Federal agency, or with non-Federal records, for the purpose of: ( i ) Establishing or verifying the eligibility of, or continuing compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements by, applicants for, recipients or beneficiaries of, participants in, or providers of services with respect to, cash or in-kind assistance or payments under Federal benefit programs, or
( ii ) Recouping payments or delinquent debts under such Federal benefit programs;
( 2 ) A Postal Service automated personnel or payroll system of records with another automated personnel or payroll system of records of the Postal Service or other Federal Agency or with non-Federal records.
( d ) *Other computer matching activities.* ( 1 ) The following kinds of computer matches are specifically excluded from the term “matching program”: ( i ) Statistical matches whose purpose is solely to produce aggregate data stripped of personal identifiers.
( ii ) Statistical matches whose purpose is in support of any research or statistical project.
( iii ) Law enforcement investigative matches whose purpose is to gather evidence against a named person or persons in an existing investigation.
( iv ) Tax administration matches.
( v ) Routine administrative matches using Federal personnel records, provided that the purpose is not to take any adverse action against an individual.
( vi ) Internal matches using only records from Postal Service systems of records, provided that the purpose is not to take any adverse action against any individual.
( vii ) Matches performed for security clearance background checks or for foreign counterintelligence.
( 2 ) Although these and other matching activities that fall outside the definition of “matching program” are not subject to the matching provisions of the Privacy Act or OMB guidance, other provisions of the Act and of these regulations may be applicable. No matching program or other matching activity may be conducted without the prior approval of the Records Office.
[49 FR 30693, Aug. 1, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 37160, July 21, 1994; 60 FR 57344, Nov. 15, 1995; 64 FR 41290, July 30, 1999; 68 FR 56558, Oct. 1, 2003]
#### § 102-194.35 Should I create electronic Standard or Optional forms?

Yes, you should create electronic Standard or Optional forms, especially when forms are used to collect information from the public. GSA will not approve a new or revision to a Standard or Optional form unless an electronic form is being made available. Only forms covered by § 102-194.40 are exempt from this requirement. Furthermore, you should to the extent possible, use electronic form products and services that are based on open standards. However, the use of proprietary products is permitted, provided that the end user is not required to purchase a specific product or subscription to use the electronic Standard or Optional form.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Injuries and Accident Causes in the Pulpwood-Logging Industry, 1943 and 1944

              																	McElroy, Frank S. (Frank Shafer)					,	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	McCormack, George R. (George Robertson). 						*Injuries and Accident Causes in the Pulpwood-Logging Industry, 1943 and 1944 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 924*,												Washington: 								For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. GPO, 										1948,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4363,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23485-LENARD/LOUIS

IRAN SAEZ,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LOMAN DISTRIBUTORS, INC. AND 

MANUEL LOPEZ, 

Defendants.

_______________________/

NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT A 

TO JOINT MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL 

Defendants, Loman Distributors, Inc. and Manuel Lopez, by and through undersigned 

counsel, file Exhibit A, to the Joint Motion for Settlement Approval [ECF No. 37]. Exhibit A is 

the Settlement Agreement between the parties. 

Dated February 14, 2023.

s/Toussaint Cummings, Esq.

Toussaint Cummings, Esq. (119877)

toussaint@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: (305) 230-4884

Counsel for Defendants

Case 1:22-cv-23485-JAL Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, ThomasS. Astrup, Chief Financial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 15th day of July,2008.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ THOMAS S. ASTRUP                                       |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Thomas S. Astrup                                     |   |
|   | Title: Vice President-Finance and Chief  Financial Officer |   |
|        |                                                            |        |  |

 

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 102-33.150 What Federally-funded aviation activities of executive agencies are exempt from establishing Flight Program Standards under this part? The following Federally-funded activities are exempt from establishing Flight Program Standards under this part: ( a ) The Armed Forces (which includes the U.S. Coast Guard);
( b ) Agencies in the Intelligence Community; and
( c ) Entities outside the executive branch of the Federal Government when using aircraft loaned to them by an executive agency (that is, owned by an executive agency, but operated by and on behalf of the loanee) unless the loanee— ( 1 ) Uses the aircraft to conduct official Government business; or
( 2 ) Is required to follow §§ 102-33.140 through 102-33.185 under a Memorandum of Agreement governing the loan.
Exhibit C

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 156-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 1 of 2
Google Maps Distance between Haslem Home and Intersection of Weston Road and Griffin Road 

Source: https://goo.gl/maps/VVtKWxNiMwJnzxBbA

KEY 

Destination: Location of Purported Substitute Service Starting point: Haslem Home Address 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 156-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 2 of 2
UM TED STATES DISTRICT CO IJRT

SOUTH ERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE N0.22-81746-CV -M IDDLEBRO0KS

M AUREEN HERBST,

Plaintiff,

AX RICAN ORTHODONTICS CORPORATION,

Defendant.

/

ORDER GRANTING COUNSEL'SM OTION TO W ITID M W m DENYING

REOUEST FOR 30.DAY STAY OF CASE

TI'H SCAUSE com esbeforetheCourtuponthemotionofStevenL.Schww berg,esq.'s

(GtMz.Schwnrtzberg'')towithdraw mscounselofrecordforPlaintiff,EledonFebruary24,2023

(DE27).lntheMotion,Mr.SchwnrtzbergindicatesthatPlaintiffseeksastayofthecmseandany

pendingdeadlinesfor30daystogivePlnintiffanopportunitytoreninnew cotmsel.(DE27at2).

In supportofhis M otion,M T.Schwnrtzberg cites thatPlaintic s Cotmseland Plnintif have

tireconcilabledifferences''necessiutingwithdrawalascotmselforPlnintiff.(DE27at1).

UnderLocalRule11.1(d)(3),ltnoattorneyshalwithdrawtheattomey'sappearanceinany

action orproceeding exceptby leave ofCourtahernotice served on the attorney'sclientand

opposingcounqel.''L.R.11.1(d)(3).Mz.Schwartzberghasindicatedthatsuchnoticehasbeen

serveduponPlaintiffandhasindicatedthatthemotionisunopposedby opposingcounsel.

Accordingly,itisORDERED andADJUDGED asfollows:

'rheMotiontoWithdraw (DE 27)isGRANTED,buttherequestforastayis

DEM ED.

Case 9:22-cv-81746-DMM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/28/2023 Page 1 of 2
2. AttorneyStevenL.Schwarzbergshallbeterminatedascounselofrecord,andshall

nolongerhaveanyresponsibilityforthism atter.

PlaintiffSH ALL H AVE 14 DAYS 9om the date ofthisOrderto secure new

counselorenteraproseappearance.Accordingly,no latertban M arch 10,2023,

Plnintic snew counselshal 5le a notice ofappearance orPlnintiffshallfle a

noticeoîproseappearance.

Attom ey Steven L.

Plaintiffwithin TW O DAYS 9om thedateoftllisOrderand confirm Plaintic s

receiptthereof.Steven L.SchwarzbergisfurtherDIRECTED to 5leacertiscate

4. Schwazzberg SHALL SERVE a copy of this Order upon

ofserviceindicatingthedateon wllich servicewœsaccomplished andthem nnner

inwlzich PlaintiT sreceiptofthisOrderwasconfrmed.

PlaintiF iscautionedthatfailuretotim ely com plywith thisorderm ay result

in dism issalofthisaetionforfailuretoprosecuteorforfailuretocom plywith

courtorders.n ePartiesareadvisedthattltisOrderwillnotconstim tegoodcause

tomodifyandorextendlitigation deadlines.

Plainti& srequestfora stayofthecaseand any pendingdeadlinesfor30daysis

DEM ED.AfterPlaintiffretninsnew counsel(oradvisesthecourtofherintentto

pïoceedprosehIwilconsiderwhetherreschedulingpretrialdeadlinesisnecessary

uponappropdatemotionand ifgoodcauseisshown.

SIGNEDinChambersatWestPalmBeach,Flodda6iszc ofF 2023.

D ALD M .NHDDLEBROOKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: CounselofRecord

2

Case 9:22-cv-81746-DMM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/28/2023 Page 2 of 2
FY 2021 Q2 FOIA Quarterly Report

Agency

Corporation for National and Community Service

Reporting Quarter

2021 Q2

10 Oldest Requests

Did your agency have 10 or more perfected requests pending at the end of the last fiscal year? If so, please select 

the number 10. If your agency had fewer than 10, please select the correct number.

5

Of the ten or fewer requests identified in your previous response, please select the number of requests your 

agency has closed during the current fiscal year.

2

FOIA Requests Information

Component Requests Received in Requests Processed Requests Backlogged as of

Reporting Quarter in Reporting Quarter End of Reporting Quarter 

CNCS 13 11 16
13460 S.W. 24 St. Miami, FL 33175 

TEL: 305-877-9722 

January 25, 2016 

Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division. 

800 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington D.C. 20591 

To Whom It May Concern: 

This letter is to inquire the status of Juan C. Melendez DBA Orthotek petition for Section 333 Exemption, submitted 

for review on May, 2015. I would like to make sure, the agency has all the required documentation to proceed with a 

ruling on my petition. If there is any additional information that I can be provided to expedite this process , please let 

me know. 

Best regards. 

Best regards. 

Juan C. Melendez DBA Orthotek 

Juan C. Melendez 

13460 S.W. 24 St. 

Miami, FL 33175 

TEL: 305-877-9722 

orthotek@otekmap.com
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.725 Alternate funds disbursal. If GSA withholds Federal financial assistance from a recipient under this regulation, the Administrator may disburse the assistance to an alternate recipient; any public or nonprofit private organization; or agency or State or political subdivision of the State. The Administrator requires any alternate recipient to demonstrate: ( a ) The ability to comply with this regulation; and
( b ) The ability to achieve the goals of the Federal Statutes authorizing the Federal financial assistance.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

d0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145229

In re CONSERVATORSHIP OF JAMES

CANNON, SR.

_________________________________________

RONALD CANNON, SC: 145229

Appellant. COA: 306630

Wayne Probate: 

2011-766288-CA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2012 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Corporation for National and Community Service (operating as AmeriCorps) Quarterly FOIA Report

Fiscal Year 2023, Quarter Q4

1. Ten Oldest Pending Requests: 6

2. Ten Oldest Requests Closed: 5

3. Agency Component Abbreviations

Component 

Abbreviation Component Name

CNCS Corporation for National and Community Service

Agency / 

Component

Number of 

requests 

backlogged

Number of 

requests 

processed

Number of 

requests received

CNCS 8 17 21