alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the annual report of Genio Group,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB/A  for the period  ending  September  30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 8, 2004 (the "Report"),  I, Shai
Bar-Lavi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Shai Bar-Lavi
--------------------------
Shai Bar-Lavi
Chief Executive Officer
September 8, 2004

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### NEHEMIAH RAPLEE, Appellant, *v.*STEPHEN T. ARNOT, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered on the decision of a judge, at the Tates county Special Term.

The court, after consideration of the evidence in the case, concluded that the pleadings precluded a consideration of the case as it was really presented by the evidence, and that the General Term was not at liberty on this appeal to make so radical a change in the nature of the action as would justify a reversal of the judgment.

*424
      *J. McGuire*and *William Rumsey,*for the appellant.

*George B. Bradley,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Gilbert, J.

Judgment affirmed, without prejudice to any other action or proceeding.
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)   In connection with the Annual Report of Health Enhancement Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Janet L. Crance, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     Date: April 13, 2007 /s/ Janet L. Crance Janet L. Crance Chief Accounting Officer   A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### § 955.36 Effective dates and applicability.

These revised rules govern proceedings under this part docketed on or after July 2, 2015.

[80 FR 31305, June 2, 2015]
#### § 102-117.125 How detailed must I describe property for shipment when communicating to a TSP?

You must describe property in enough detail for the TSP to determine the type of equipment or any special precautions necessary to move the shipment. Details might include weight, volume, measurements, routing, hazardous cargo, or special handling designations.
#### § 102-118.215 May my agency pay a TSP any extra fees to pay for the preparation and use of the GBL or GTR?

No, your agency must not pay any additional charges for the preparation and use of the GBL or GTR. Your agency may not pay a TSP a higher rate than comparable under commercial procedures for transportation bought on a GBL or GTR.
Title for the presentation goes here

AmeriCorps | National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC)

Apply at AmeriCorps.gov/NCCC

© 2024 AmeriCorps.
THE BASICS

Full-time, immersive 

service. Traditional 

Corps, FEMA Corps, and 

Forest Corps serve 10 to 

11 months. Summer of 

Service is 2 to 3 months.

LENGTH OF SERVICE

Assigned a team of 8-12 

members with one 

Team Leader. Work, live, 

travel together.

TEAM BASED

Assigned to one of 4 

regional campuses

which will be home base 

between each of the 3-

6 service projects.

4 CAMPUSES

Age limit for Corps. 

No upper age limit for 

Team Leaders.

18-26 YEARS OLD*

*The CARES Act, passed by Congress in response to the Coronavirus pandemic, increased the upper age limit for participation as an AmeriCorps 

NCCC Corps Member to 26 years old. Under the CARES Act, Section 3514(d), the upper age limit for AmeriCorps NCCC members is 26. AmeriCorps 

NCCC applies the upper age limit at the time a member arrives on campus and is activated as a member. That means individuals must be on 

campus and activated as members for at least one day before turning 27. The 26-year upper age limit will remain in effect until further notice.

AmeriCorps NCCC is a full-time service program that covers lodging and travel 

expenses, allowing young adults to serve on a team and make an impact in 

communities across the country while gaining valuable leadership skills.

© 2024 AmeriCorps.
© 2024 AmeriCorps.
BENEFITS

Experiences that help young adults grow 

professionally. They develop leadership 

skills that will come in handy throughout 

their careers.

Structure & Leadership 

Development.

Once members graduate, they receive 

an Education Award of approximately 

$7,000 to be used for student loans or 

future educational expenses.

Earn an Education Award.

Teams leave their mark on communitie 

through their service.

Make a difference.

Teams travel and discover new 

communities as they serve.

Travel the country. 

Members receive a modest, biweekly living allowance during 

service. 

Living allowance.

Members receive housing, food, 

transportation, and medical 

benefits.

Basic expenses covered

© 2024 AmeriCorps.
© 2024 AmeriCorps.
APPLICATION PROCESS

© 2024 AmeriCorps.

Search Opportunities

Apply

Application Assessment

Invitation to Serve

Visit My.AmeriCorps.gov to search NCCC 

opportunities.

Complete a profile, complete an application, 

and submit your application.

Once a Corps Member applicant completes an 

eligibility questionnaire, NCCC will assess your 

application; Team Leaders applicants are 

reviewed and selected by each campus.

Receive confirmation that you are selected to 

serve, complete medical and legal clearances, 

and begin service term.

3

1 

2

4
CONNECT WITH US

@AmeriCorpsNCCC

Reach out to us or stay connected through social media. 

/AmeriCorpsNCCC

@AmeriCorpsNCCC

AmeriCorps.gov/NCCC

ANCCC@AmeriCorps.gov

1-800-942-2677

© 2024 AmeriCorps.
§ 52.42 Views of the Coast Guard. ( a ) The Board shall transmit to the Commandant of the Coast Guard or his or her delegate a copy of each application for relief submitted and docketed under subpart C of this part, together with any briefs, memoranda, and documentary evidence submitted or obtained in the case.
( b ) The Commandant of the Coast Guard or his or her delegate may forward to the Board a written advisory opinion presenting the views of the Coast Guard on any case before the Board.
( c ) An advisory opinion furnished by the Coast Guard under this section shall not be binding upon the Board, but shall be considered by the Board, along with all other information and material submitted in the particular case, if it is received by the Board within 135 days of the date the application is complete. The Chair may, in his or her discretion, grant the Coast Guard an extension of the time provided for submitting the advisory opinion.
( d ) The Board shall promptly send a copy of each submission made by the Coast Guard under this section to the applicant involved, subject to the limitations in §§ 52.42(c) and 52.43(c). Each applicant has 30 days, from the date the Board sends the submission, to submit to the Board a written rebuttal or response to the Coast Guard's advisory opinion or a written request for an extension of the time to respond, subject to the provisions in § 52.26.
( e ) Advisory opinions submitted by the Coast Guard and briefs submitted by applicants in response to the advisory opinions of the Coast Guard must be assembled in a manner that permits easy reproduction and may not exceed fifteen double-spaced typewritten pages in a type size with no more than twelve characters per inch. This limitation does not apply to supporting documentary evidence. In complex cases, the Chair may waive this limitation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-315-000]

Take notice that on June 1, 2000, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company (Koch) tendered for filing its cash-in/cash-out report for the period April 1, 1999 through March 31, 2000.

Koch states that copies of this filing have been served upon Koch's customers, state commissions and other interested parties.

                    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 13, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party                           ( print page 36894)                        must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).                

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14709  Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.3
 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION
  I, Robert T. Peterson, certify that:
  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMERCO and U-Haul International, Inc.;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert T. Peterson
 Robert T. Peterson
 Chief Financial Officer of U-Haul International, Inc.
  Date: November 9, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.706-1 Normal operation or statutory objective of any program or activity. A recipient is permitted to take an action, otherwise prohibited, if the action reasonably takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity. An action reasonably takes into account age as a factor if: ( a ) Age is used as a measure or approximation of one or more other characteristics; and
( b ) The other characteristic must be measured or approximated for the normal operation of the program or activity to continue, or to achieve any statutory objective of the program or activity; and
( c ) The other characteristic can be reasonably measured or approximated by the use of age; and
( d ) The other characteristic is impractical to measure directly on an individual basis.
#### NORMAN COX and another, Administrators, etc., Appellants, *v.*WARREN S. WIGHTMAN and others, Respondents.

*Assignment of mortgage to esca/pe taxation*— *effect of.*

This action was brought to recover the amount of a mortgage collected by the defendants, which had been assigned by the plaintiffs’ intestate to the defendants’ testator. The plaintiffs claimed that the assignment was invalid, for the reason that it was made to enable their intestate to escape taxation. *Held,*that the assignment was valid to pass the title to the mortgage, and that as the intestate had. put his property out of his hands for the purpose of escaping taxation, the court would not help him to get it back.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, entered upon the report of a referee.

*E. H. Prindle,*for the appellants.

*R. A. Stanton*and *Jenks &*Matterson, for the respondents.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5276

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to revise the coverage

of immunosuppressive drugs under the Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2000

Mr. CAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to revise

the coverage of immunosuppressive drugs under the

Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Comprehensive Im5 munosuppressive Drug Coverage for Transplant Patients

6 Act of 2000’’.
2

•HR 5276 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF COVERAGE OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE

2 DRUGS UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

3 (a) REVISION.—

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(s)(2)(J) of the

5 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)(J)) (as

6 amended by section 227(a) of the Medicare, Med7 icaid, and SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act

8 of 1999 (113 Stat. 1501A–354), as enacted into law

9 by section 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106–113) is

10 amended by striking ‘‘, to an individual who re11 ceives’’ and all that follows before the semicolon at

12 the end and inserting ‘‘to an individual who has re13 ceived an organ transplant’’.

14 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

15 (A) Section 1832 of the Social Security

16 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395k) (as amended by section

17 227(b) of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP

18 Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (113

19 Stat. 1501A–354), as enacted into law by sec20 tion 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106–113) is

21 amended—

22 (i) by striking subsection (b); and

23 (ii) by redesignating subsection (c) as

24 subsection (b).

25 (B) Subsections (c) and (d) of section 227

26 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Bal-
3

•HR 5276 IH

1 anced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (113

2 Stat. 1501A–355), as enacted into law by sec3 tion 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106–113, are re4 pealed.

5 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made

6 by this subsection shall apply to drugs furnished on

7 or after the date of enactment of this Act.

8 (b) EXTENSION OF CERTAIN SECONDARY PAYER RE9 QUIREMENTS.—Section 1862(b)(1)(C) of the Social Secu10 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(b)(1)(C)) is amended by adding

11 at the end the following: ‘‘With regard to immuno12 suppressive drugs furnished on or after the date of enact13 ment of the Comprehensive Immunosuppressive Drug

14 Coverage for Transplant Patients Act of 2000, this sub15 paragraph shall be applied without regard to any time lim16 itation.’’.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ

AND EDITH ROMAN,

Relator. '

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 14

- 00315

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator s

, Alejandro Hernandez and Edith Roman , ha ve filed a pro se petition for writ of

mandamus against the Honorable Thomas Spieczny , Judge of the County Court at Law No. 7 of

El Paso County, Texas

. They ask that we order Respondent to set aside an order entered on

November 21, 2014 staying cause number 2014

- DCV0146, styled Alejandro Hernandez and

Edith Roman v. Danielle McCulley a/k/a Danielle McCully

- Stogner , pending resolution of a

criminal case (cause number 20130C13537 pending in the County Court at Law No. 3 of El Paso

County). Relators have also filed a mo tion for emergency relief.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the

relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance

Company of America , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id . at 136. Based on the record before us, we

conclude that Relator s ha ve not established t he y are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly,- 2

-

we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency relief

. See

T EX .R.A PP .P. 52.8(a) , 52.10

.

January 14 , 20 15

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

The United States Air Force is issuing this notice to advise the public of its decision to extend the public and agency scoping period for the preparation of the Draft EIS which will assess the potential environmental impacts of a proposal to beddown the initial F-22 Operational Wing. 

The comment period for scoping related comments has been extended to September 30, 2000 to ensure sufficient time to consider public and agency comments in the screening process and preparation of the Draft EIS. Comments should be submitted to the address below. HQ ACC/CEVP, 129 Andrews Street, Suite 102, Langley AFB, VA 23665-2769, Attn: Ms. Brenda Cook. 

Janet A. Long, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-15128 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-U
#### § 102-192.45 How can we request a deviation from these requirements, and who can approve it?

See §§ 102-2.60 through 102-2.110 of this chapter to request a deviation from the requirements of this part. The Administrator of General Services and those to whom the Administrator has delegated such authority have the power to approve or deny a deviation.