alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.380 How will the Coast Guard handle compliance and enforcement of these regulations? ( a ) While operating in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States, the Coast Guard may board a vessel to determine that— ( 1 ) Valid copies of the company's Document of Compliance certificate and Safety Management Certificate are on board, or evidence of the same for vessels from countries not party to Chapter IX of SOLAS; and
( 2 ) The vessel's crew or shore-based personnel are following the procedures and policies of the safety management system while operating the vessel or transferring cargoes.
( b ) A foreign vessel that does not comply with these regulations, or one on which the vessel's condition or use of its safety management system do not substantially agree with the particulars of the Document of Compliance certificate, Safety Management Certificate or other required evidence of compliance, may be detained by order of the COTP or OCMI. This may occur at the port or terminal where the violation is found until, in the opinion of the detaining authority, the vessel can go to sea without presenting an unreasonable threat of harm to the port, the marine environment, the vessel or its crew. The detention order may allow the vessel to go to another area of the port, if needed, rather than stay at the place where the violation was found.
( c ) If any vessel that must comply with this part or with the ISM Code does not have a Safety Management Certificate and a copy of its company's Document of Compliance certificate on board, a vessel owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, Master, or any other individual in charge of the vessel that is subject to this part, may be liable for a civil penalty under 46 U.S.C. 3318. For foreign vessels, the Coast Guard may request the Secretary of the Treasury to withhold or revoke the clearance required by 46 U.S.C. App. 91. The Coast Guard may ask the Secretary to permit the vessel's departure after the bond or other surety is filed.
#### § 794.112 Only independent and local enterprises qualify for exemption.

The legislative history of the exemption (§ 794.101) shows that the proponents of an amendment to provide the relief which it grants from the overtime pay provisions of the Act were organizations of independent local merchants who did not as a rule engage extensively in interstate operations such as those typical of major oil companies, and who functioned primarily at the local level in distributing petroleum products at wholesale or in bulk. As a result the exemption provided by the Act, like that requested, was limited to enterprises which are “local” (§ 794.113) and are “independently owned and controlled” (§§ 794.114-794.118).
§ 3011.304 Termination and amendment of access to non-public materials. ( a ) *Termination of access.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, access to non-public materials granted under § 3011.301 terminates either when the Commission issues the final order or report concluding the proceeding(s) in which the participant who filed the motion seeking access represented that the non-public materials would be used, or when the person granted access withdraws or is otherwise no longer involved in the proceeding(s), whichever occurs first. For purposes of this paragraph, an order or report is not considered final until after the possibility of judicial review expires (including the completion of any Commission response to judicial review, if applicable).
( 2 ) Upon termination of access, all non-public materials, and any duplicates, in the possession of each person (and any individual working on behalf of that person) granted access shall be destroyed or returned to the Commission. The participant who filed the motion seeking access shall file with the Commission a notice of termination of access and attach a certification of compliance with protective conditions executed by each person (and any individual working on behalf of that person) granted access to the non-public materials. The template Certification of Compliance with Protective Conditions and Termination of Access in Appendix A to this subpart may be used and modified to comply with this requirement.
( b ) *Amendment of access.* Any person may file a motion seeking to amend any protective conditions related to access of non-public materials, including extending the timeframe for which access is granted or expanding the persons to whom access is to be granted, in accordance with § 3011.301.
[83 FR 31281, July 3, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 9643, Feb. 19, 2020]
##### 



TRI-ISTHMUS GROUP, INC.
    
    2007 FORM 10-KT
 Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Transition Report on Form 10-K of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ David HirschhornDavid HirschhornChief Executive Officer
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Starwalker PR LLC ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91B4N-09-D-5005 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61520 

Richard L. Moorhouse, Esq. 

Jozef S. Przygrodzki, Esq. 

Greenberg Traurig, LLP 

McLean, VA 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

Frank A. March, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL ON THE 

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 

The government moves to dismiss ASBCA No. 61520* for lack of jurisdiction 

because, it says, the contracting officer never received appellant's September 14, 2017 

claim, which is attached to appellant's complaint. It is up to appellant to demonstrate 

by a preponderance of the evidence that we have jurisdiction by showing that it first 

presented its claim to the contracting officer. See Rover Construction Co., ASBCA 

No. 60703, 17-1 BCA ,i 36,682 at 178,613; King Aerospace, Inc., ASBCA No. 57057, 

16-1 BCA ,i 36,451 at 177,653. Appellant's response to the motion points to an email 

addressed to the contracting officer and others that references an "attached" certified 

claim; that response, however, does not provide the referenced attachment. In 

addition, the contracting officer has declared under oath that she did not receive the 

claim (gov't mot., ex. 3). 

Finally, appellant's response does not request that we deny the government's 

motion; it says that we should stay proceedings to give the contracting officer (who, 

appellant says, "now has a complete copy of the September 14, 2017 claim") time to 

* This decision only pertains to ASBCA No. 61520, which is consolidated with 

ASBCA No. 61557. 
I 

l 

decide the claim (app. resp. at 2). The preponderance of the evidence before us is not 

that appellant first presented its claim to the contracting officer. Therefore, the appeal 

is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

Dated: August 1, 2018 

I concur in result 

~·· 

~Jk~~S~~CKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur in result 

c~4 

REBA PAGE 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

2 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur in result 

J. REID PROUTY 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I concur 

D~zL 

DONALDE.KINNER~ 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61520, Appeal of Starwalker PR LLC, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

3 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
### Quaternary movement along the La Jencia Fault, central New Mexico

By: M. N. Machette

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1440

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALLEN
TELECOM'S MARCH 31, 1998 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          23,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,022)
<INVENTORY>                                     97,534
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               258,549
<PP&E>                                         107,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                (48,453)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 506,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,169
<BONDS>                                        122,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,722
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   506,698
<SALES>                                        113,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,369
<CGS>                                         (77,621)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (77,621)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (22,697)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (71)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,188)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,792
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,718)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,338
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Earnings per Share amounts have been calculated in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings
per Share". The above captions for primary and fully diluted include in the
basic and diluted EPS amounts, respectively.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(b)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alberto-Culver Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Cernugel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/ William J. Cernugel  
|                         
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer  
|February 12, 2004
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William H. Wilcox, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.      /s/ William H. Wilcox      --------------------------------------
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5393

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a criminal penalty for

the unauthorized placement of a writing with a consumer product, and

for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 2000

Mr. MCCOLLUM (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a criminal

penalty for the unauthorized placement of a writing with

a consumer product, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. UNAUTHORIZED PLACEMENT OF WRITING

4 WITH A CONSUMER PRODUCT.

5 (a) UNAUTHORIZED PLACEMENT.—Section 1365 of

6 title 18, United States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as

8 subsections (g) and (h), respectively;
2

•HR 5393 IH

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol2 lowing new subsection:

3 ‘‘(f)(1) Whoever knowingly stamps, prints, places, or

4 inserts any writing in or on any consumer product, or the

5 box, package, or other container of any consumer product,

6 prior to its sale to any consumer, shall be fined under this

7 title or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.

8 ‘‘(2) This subsection shall not apply in any case in

9 which the manufacturer, retailer, or authorized distributor

10 of the product consents to the stamping, printing, placing,

11 or inserting of the writing for promotional or sales pur12 poses.’’; and

13 (3) Subsection (h) (as redesignated by para14 graph (1)) is amended—

15 (A) in paragraph (3)(D), by striking

16 ‘‘and’’;

17 (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the pe18 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

19 (C) by adding after paragraph (4) the fol20 lowing:

21 ‘‘(5) the term ‘writing’ means any form of rep22 resentation or communication, including handbills,

23 notices, or advertising that contains letters, words,

24 or pictorial representations.’’.
3

•HR 5393 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Sections 2261A

2 and 2332b(g)(3) of this title are each amended by striking

3 ‘‘1365(g)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘1365’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,078,903
<SECURITIES>                                17,893,949
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,670,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                   343,097
<INVENTORY>                                 18,639,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,966,624
<PP&E>                                      24,006,175
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,027,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,450,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,973,673
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,537,993
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,585,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,450,272
<SALES>                                     16,808,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,808,032
<CGS>                                        9,854,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,854,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,943,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,311,852
<INCOME-TAX>                                   442,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            869,852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   869,852
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

                      SUNBEAM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CALCULATIONS OF EARNINGS
                           PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED                  NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                              ---------------------------------   --------------------------------
                                               SEPTEMBER 29,     SEPTEMBER 28,     SEPTEMBER 29,     SEPTEMBER 28,
                                                   1996              1997              1996              1997
                                              ---------------   ---------------   ---------------   --------------
                                                         (UNAUDITED)                        (UNAUDITED)
<S>                                           <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net earnings (loss) applicable to
  common shareholders .....................     $ (18,088)          $34,572           $ 6,478          $67,654
                                                =========           ========          ========         ========
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding ...............        83,578            85,283            82,543           84,762
Add:
   Common shares issuable for exercise
   of options, net of shares assumed to have
      been acquired with proceeds
      therefrom ...........................            --             2,950             1,250            3,122
                                                ---------           --------          --------         --------
Number of shares applicable to earnings
  per share calculation  ..................        83,578            88,233            83,793           87,884
                                                =========           ========          ========         ========
Earnings (loss) per share of common stock..     $    (.22)          $   .39           $   .08          $   .77
</TABLE>