alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

           CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, James N L Chow, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of China Ventures Limited
(registrant];

2. Based on my knowledge, this annnual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. As sole officer of the registrant, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
      prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
      Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

March 23, 2005



/s/ James N L Chow
--------------------------------
James N L Chow
President and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
#### Gilbert SIZEMORE and Arnold Roark, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 13531.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 21, 1958.

T. T. Burchell and Pleaz Wm. Mobley, Manchester, Ky., for appellants.

Henry J. Cook, Marvin D. Jones and William S. Tribell, Lexington, Ky., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

*350PER CURIAM.

This appeal attacks a judgment of the District Court entered upon a jury verdict finding Sizemore and Roark guilty of violations of Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1503.

The questions raised before this court are questions of fact. As to all such questions the verdict is supported by substantial evidence. The trial court correctly instructed the jury as to the issues and the applicable law and no reversible error appears in the record.

It is ordered that the judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
#### Kate Tootle et al. v. First National Bank of Chadron.

Filed October 16, 1894.

No. 4689.

Sales: Fraud: Rescission. The views expressed and rules announced in the opinion rendered in this case at the time of its original hearing in this court (34 Neb., 863) affirmed and adhered to.

Rehearing of case reported in 34 Neb., 863.

*Spargur & Fisher*and *F. M. Dorrington & Sons,*for plaintiffs in error.

*238*Albert W. Grites, contra.*

Harrison, J.

This case was presented to the court by petition in error to review the proceedings in the trial in the district court of Dawes county. It was submitted, and the points raised by the petition in error, and discussed at the hearing in this court, were decided in an opinion filed June 11, 1892, reported in 34 Neb., 863. As a result of the conclusions reached the case was reversed and remanded. For a later decision of this court on the same subject see *McKinney v. First Nat. Bank of Chadron,*36 Neb., 629. The losing party herein filed a motion for a rehearing, which was sustained and the rehearing granted. We have again carefully examined the pleadings and evidence and the arguments in the briefs filed, but discover no reason for changing the views expressed and the rules promulgated in the opinion rendered at the former hearing. Consequently, they will be adhered to and the case

Reversed and remanded.
Case 1:22-cv-22376-JEM   Document 69   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2024   Page 1 of 1
§ 960.10 Net worth exhibit. ( a ) Each applicant except a qualified tax-exempt organization or cooperative association must provide with its application a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant and any affiliates (as defined in § 960.4(f)) when the proceeding was initiated. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant that provides full disclosure of the applicant's and its affiliates' assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the standards in this part. The adjudicative officer may require an applicant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.
( b ) Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit will be included in the public record of the proceeding. However, an applicant that objects to public disclosure of information in any portion of the exhibit and believes there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure may submit that portion of the exhibit directly to the adjudicative officer in a sealed envelope labeled “Confidential Financial Information”, accompanied by a motion to withhold the information from public disclosure. The motion shall describe the information sought to be withheld and explain, in detail, why it falls within one or more of the specific exemptions from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b) (1) through (9), why public disclosure of the information would adversely affect the applicant, and why disclosure is not required in the public interest. The material in question shall be served on counsel representing the agency against which the applicant seeks an award, but need not be served on any other party to the proceeding. If the adjudicative officer finds that the information should not be withheld from disclosure, it shall be placed in the public record of the proceeding. Otherwise, any request to inspect or copy the exhibit shall be disposed of in accordance with the Postal Service's established procedures under the Freedom of Information Act, part 265 of this title.
EXHIBIT
32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David L.
Yowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The information contained
  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                   | 
|------------------ | 
|/s/ David L. Yowan
|                   | 

|       |                        
|------ | -----------------------
|Name:  | David L. Yowan         
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:  | August 11, 2006        

The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23708-CV-WILLIAMS

CHARLA BEAUVAIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMISIAL MEDSPA LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s Reports

and Recommendations (DE 42; DE 43) on Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Final Default 

Judgment (DE 33) (“Motion for Judgment”) and Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for 

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (DE 34) (“Motion for Fees”). In the Report and 

Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment (DE 42), Judge Reid recommends 

that the Motion for Judgment be granted. Specifically, Judge Reid recommends that 

Plaintiff recover from Defendants $3,547.50 in damages for unpaid overtime wages and 

liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and $7,479.71 in lost 

wages under the Florida Private Whistleblowers Act (“FWA”). (Id. at 5.) In the Report and 

Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees (DE 43), Judge Reid recommends that 

the Motion for Fees be granted in part and denied in part. Judge Reid recommends that 

the Court award Plaintiff $12,289.75 in attorneys’ fees and $532.00 in costs (id. at 12), a 

slight reduction from the $17,556.25 in attorneys’ fees and $682.00 in costs Plaintiff 

Case 1:22-cv-23708-KMW Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/27/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

requested (DE 34). No Party filed objections to either Report and Recommendation and 

the time to do so has passed.

Upon an independent review of the Reports and Recommendations, the record,

and applicable law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment (DE 42) is

AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. The Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees (DE 43) is

AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (DE 33) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Charla 

Beauvais shall recover from Defendants Amisial Medspa LLC and Edy Amisial

$3,547.50 in damages for unpaid overtime wages and liquidated damages under 

the FLSA and $7,479.71 in lost wages under the FWA. Interest shall accrue on this 

judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees (DE 34) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 

Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded $12,289.75 in attorneys’ fees and $532.00 in costs.

5. The Court will separately enter an order of final judgment.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 27th day of December, 

2023.

Case 1:22-cv-23708-KMW Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/27/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 102-117.290 What is the difference between temporary nonuse, suspension and debarment? ( a ) Temporary nonuse is limited to your agency and initiated by the agency transportation officers for a period not to exceed 90 days for: ( 1 ) Willful violations of the terms of the rate tender;
( 2 ) Persistent or willful failure to meet requested packing and pickup service;
( 3 ) Failure to meet required delivery dates;
( 4 ) Violation of Department of Transportation (DOT) hazardous material regulations;
( 5 ) Mishandling of freight, damaged or missing transportation seals, improper loading, blocking, packing or bracing of property;
( 6 ) Improper routing of property;
( 7 ) Subjecting your shipments to unlawful seizure or detention by failing to pay debts;
( 8 ) Operating without legal authority;
( 9 ) Failure to settle claims according to Government regulations; or
( 10 ) Repeated failure to comply with regulations of DOT, Surface Transportation Board, State or local governments or other Government agencies.
( b ) Suspension is disqualifying a TSP from receiving orders for certain services under a contract or rate tender pending an investigation or legal proceeding. A TSP may be suspended on adequate evidence of: ( 1 ) Fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a contract for transportation;
( 2 ) Violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes;
( 3 ) Embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; and
( 4 ) Any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that seriously and directly affects the present responsibility of the TSP as a transporter of the Government's property or the HHG of its employees relocated for the Government.
( c ) Debarment means action taken to exclude a contractor from contracting with all Federal agencies. The seriousness of the TSP's acts or omissions and the mitigating factors must be considered in making any debarment decisions. A TSP may be debarred for the following reasons: ( 1 ) Failure of a TSP to take the necessary corrective actions within the period of temporary nonuse; or
( 2 ) Conviction of or civil judgment for any of the causes for suspension.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-62112-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

TED MENDEZ, Magistrate Judge Augustine-Birch

Plaintiff,

v.

WASH PLUS, LLC.,

and MICHAEL D. KELCH, individually,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO 

APPROVE THE PARTIES’ SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry of Order 

Approving Settlement and Dismissing Case with Prejudice, filed May 31, 2023. [DE 19]. The 

Court having reviewed the motion and the file in this cause, having noted the agreement of the 

parties and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Joint Motion [DE 19] is GRANTED. The parties’ 

settlement agreement [DE 19-1] is hereby APPROVED. It is further ordered that this action is 

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the 

parties’ settlement, should such enforcement become necessary. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case 

and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 

31st day of May, 2023.

Case 0:22-cv-62112-WPD Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 1 of 2
Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-62112-WPD Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2

                        C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the period ending February 25, 2006 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b)  and  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350  (as  adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002)  that  he  is  the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company  and  that:  (1)  the  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the  periods  covered  in  the  Report.

/s/  Paul R. Cook
-----------------------------------
Paul R. Cook
Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  April 7, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William S. Ayer, Chairman,
President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge,

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                              |  |                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|                                                                              | 
|By                                                                            |  | /s/ William S. Ayer
|William S. Ayer Chairman,
President & Chief Executive Officer August 13, 2007
Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 69-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 69-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2023 Page 2 of 2
## u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY DISHWASHER TEST PROCEDURE PROPOSED RULE PUBLIC HEARING Forrestal Building, Room lE-245 Tuesday, October 22, 2002 9:00 a.m.- 4:00 p.m. Agenda Purpose ofHearing: To receive comments on the changes and additions proposed for the dishwasher test procedure. 9:00 a.m. Introductions and Agenda Review 9:15 a.m. Department ofEnergy OverviewofRecent Dishwasher Rulemakings 9:30 a.m. Presentation on Test Procedure Changes • Testing Soil-sensing Models with Soiled Dishware • Reduced Average-use Cycles perYear • New Definitions • Voltage Requirements • Stand-by Energy Measurement and Reporting 10:00 a.m. Presentation on Dishwasher Survey Review and Findings 10:30 a.m. BREAK 10:45 a.m. Stakeholder Remarks 11 :45 a.m. Identification ofStakeholder Issues for Discussion 12:00 p.m. Break for Lunch 1:00 p.m. Discussion ofIssues • Presentation onDefinition ofStandby Mode 3:50 p.m. Next Steps 4:00 p.m. Adjourn
#### § 327.2 Applicability.

This regulation is applicable to all divisions and districts responsible for the conduct of public hearings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN PART II, ITEM 8 OF FORM 10-K DATED DECEMBER 31,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             188
<SECURITIES>                                       199
<RECEIVABLES>                                      117
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         39
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   562
<PP&E>                                             408
<DEPRECIATION>                                     100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               67
<BONDS>                                            882
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,614
<SALES>                                            109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   411
<CGS>                                               85
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    149
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 92
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        92
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.702 Applicability. ( a ) The regulation applies to each GSA recipient and to each program or activity operated by the recipient.
( b ) The regulations does not apply to: ( 1 ) An age distinction contained in that part of Federal, State, local statute or ordinance adopted by an elected, general purpose legislative body that: ( i ) Provides any benefits or assistance to persons based on age;
( ii ) Establishes criteria for participation in age-related terms; or
( iii ) Describes intended beneficiaries or target groups in age-related terms.
( 2 ) Any employment practice of any employer, employment agency, labor organization or any labor-management apprenticeship training program, except for any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance for public service employment under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) (29 U.S.C. 801 *et seq.*).