alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5302 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5302

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 1010 Fifth Avenue 
 in Seattle, Washington, as the ``William Kenzo Nakamura United States 
                             Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5302

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 1010 Fifth Avenue 
 in Seattle, Washington, as the ``William Kenzo Nakamura United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 1010 Fifth Avenue in 
Seattle, Washington, shall be known and designated as the ``William 
Kenzo Nakamura United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William Kenzo Nakamura 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 17, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 102-38.135 What constitutes a public advertisement?

Announcement of the sale using any media that reaches the public and is appropriate to the type and value of personal property to be sold is considered public advertising. You may also distribute mailings or flyers of your offer to sell to prospective purchasers on mailing lists. Public notice should be made far enough in advance of the sale to ensure adequate notice, and to target your advertising efforts toward the market that will provide the best return at the lowest cost.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                       550
<INVENTORY>                                     47,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               175,412
<PP&E>                                          87,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          207,432
<BONDS>                                          2,051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,071
<SALES>                                         45,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,338
<CGS>                                           54,819
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   296
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,006)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,006)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,340
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,666)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON 

DONALD J. TRUMP, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

 / 

 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO 

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Brad S. Karp, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of 

Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of 

Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having 

considered the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

that: 

 The Motion is GRANTED. Brad S. Karp may appear and participate in this action on 

behalf of Amici Curiae. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to 

Brad S. Karp at BKarp@paulweiss.com. 

 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 42-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 2
2 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this _____ day of 

_________________, 2022. 

 __________________________ 

 AILEEN M. CANNON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: All Counsel of Record 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 42-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ephriam JASPER, also known as Brian Townsel, also known as Kenny Moore, also known as Terell Davis, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-2374.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 3, 2004.

Ross G. Parker, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ephriam Jasper, Bradford, PA, Suzanna Kostovski, Detroit, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: GIBBONS and COOK, Circuit Judges; and OLIVER, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Solomon Oliver, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Ephriam Jasper appeals the district court’s application of two offense level enhancements for (1) his possession of firearms during a drug-related crime, and (2) his role as a manager in the offense. We affirm.

The district court did not err by imposing a two-level enhancement under section 2Dl.l(b)(l) of the Sentencing Guidelines for Jasper’s possessing firearms in connection with a drug-related crime. The government proved Jasper’s constructive possession of the firearms by a preponderance of the evidence, and Jasper offered no evidence showing the clear improbability that the weapons were connected to the crime.

Furthermore, because the evidence demonstrates that Jasper managed another person (his mother) in his criminal activity, we agree with the district court’s application of a two-level enhancement under section 3B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines.

We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5486

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include wireless telecommunications equipment in the definition of qualified technological equipment

for purposes of determining the depreciation treatment of such equipment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 18, 2000

Mr. CRANE (for himself, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. MATSUI, Ms. DUNN, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. RAMSTAD, and Mr.

SAM JOHNSON of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include

wireless telecommunications equipment in the definition

of qualified technological equipment for purposes of determining the depreciation treatment of such equipment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP4 MENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

6 168(i)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining

7 qualified technological equipment) is amended by striking
2

HR 5486 IH

1 ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at

2 the end of clause (iii) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and by insert3 ing after clause (iii) the following new clause:

4 ‘‘(iv) any wireless telecommunications

5 equipment.’’

6 (b) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIP7 MENT.—Section 168(i)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code

8 of 1986 is amended by inserting after subparagraph (C)

9 the following new subparagraph:

10 ‘‘(D) WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

11 EQUIPMENT.—For purposes of this paragraph,

12 the term ‘wireless telecommunications equip13 ment’ means all equipment used in the trans14 mission, reception, coordination, or switching of

15 wireless telecommunications service. For this

16 purpose, ‘wireless telecommunications service’

17 includes any commercial mobile radio service as

18 defined in title 47 of the Code of Federal Regu19 lations.’’

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

21 this section shall apply to property placed in service on

22 or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of OSK CAPITAL II CORP.(the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
Metrakos, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 6, 2006


                 /s/ George Metrakos
                 George Metrakos
                 Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31.1

               CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB


     I, Hunter M. A. Carr, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ITIS Holdings
Inc., a Nevada Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2005
---------------------
/s/ Hunter M. A. Carr
---------------------
Name: Hunter M. A. Carr
Title: Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23184-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

KELLY LYLES,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint [DE 18] (the “Motion”). The Court has carefully 

reviewed the Motion, notes that it is unopposed, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motion [DE 18] is GRANTED. 

Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before January 31, 2023.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 12th 

day of January, 2023.

Copies to:

Counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-23184-WPD Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### Russell C. JOHNSON and Crest-Craft Company, Appellants, v. Harold DORSEY, Appellee.

No. 13427.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct 15, 1958.

Gorman, Davis & Hengelbrok, Dolle & Rueger, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellants.

Lee J. Hereth of Cowell & Fletcher, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the oral arguments and printed briefs of the contending attorneys and on the record in the case;

And it appearing that there is not merit in the points of alleged error urged by appellants; and that the submission to the jury of defendant’s Exhibit No. 4 —produced for identification and not formally introduced in evidence — was harmless, especially in view of the fact that the exhibit was read to the jury;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

West Palm Beach Division

BRITTANY ROBERSON, REBECCA 

FREEMAN, BIANCA VIÑAS, TIFFANY 

KING, and TRESHA THOMPSON, 

individually and on behalf of others similarly 

situated,

 Plaintiffs, 

v.

HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC (dba 

HCI COLLEGE LLC and HCI 

ACQUISITION LLC), FLORIAN 

EDUCATION INVESTORS LLC, and 

STEVEN W. HART,

 Defendants.

Civil Action No. 9:22-cv-81883-RAR

District Judge: Rodolfo A. Ruiz, II

Magistrate Judge: Ryon M. McCabe

NOTICE OF FILING MEDIATOR’S REPORT

Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2(f), Plaintiffs Brittany Roberson, Rebecca Freeman, Bianca 

Viñas, Tiffany King, and Tresha Thompson (“Plaintiffs”) hereby file the Mediation Disposition 

Report authored by Mediator Lance Harke regarding the parties’ June 18, 2024, mediation, attached

hereto as Exhibit 1. 

Dated: June 25, 2024

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Nicole Mayer

NICOLE MAYER  

Florida Bar No. 012035 

Nicole@MayerLawFlorida.com

Mayer Law PLLC

171 Dommerich Drive 

Maitland, Florida 32751 

(352) 494-3657 

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 224 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2024 Page 1 of 2
2

JENNIFER THELUSMA 

Florida Bar No. 1019776 

jthelusma@ppsl.org 

REBECCA EISENBREY (pro hac vice) 

reisenbrey@ppsl.org  

VICTORIA ROYTENBERG (pro hac vice) 

vroytenberg@ppsl.org  

Project on Predatory Student Lending 

769 Centre Street, Suite 166 

Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 

(617) 322-2843 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 224 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/25/2024 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5353 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5353

  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to the marking of door 
                                hinges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2000

Mr. Gephardt (for himself, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, and Mr. Riley) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to the marking of door 
                                hinges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARKING OF DOOR HINGES.

    Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1304) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (l) as subsection (m); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (k) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(l) Marking of Certain Door Hinges.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), no 
        exception may be made under subsection (a)(3) with respect to 
        door hinges and parts thereof (except metal forgings and 
        castings imported for further processing into finished hinges 
        and door hinges designed for motor vehicles), each of which 
        shall be marked on the exposed surface of the hinge when viewed 
        after fixture with the English name of the country of origin by 
        means of die stamping, cast-in-mold lettering, etching, or 
        engraving.
            ``(2) Other means of marking.--If, because of the nature of 
        the article, it is not technically or commercially feasible to 
        mark it by 1 of the 4 methods specified in paragraph (1), the 
        article may be marked by an equally permanent method of marking 
        such as paint stenciling or, in the case of door hinges of less 
        than 3 inches in length, by marking on the smallest unit of 
        packaging utilized.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 apply to goods entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on and after the date that is 
6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2572-000]

Take notice that on May 23, 2000, Western Resources, Inc., tendered for filing notice that effective June 1, 2000 Exhibit D designated as Supplement No. 28 to Kansas Gas and Electric Company's FERC Electric Rate Schedule No. 183 (Electric Power, Transmission and Service Contract between Kansas Gas and Electric Company and Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., dated May 26, 1993) is to be canceled.

Notice of the proposed cancellation has been served upon KEPCo and the Kansas Corporation Commission.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 23, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-15355  Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6101

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HENRY CHESTER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-94-665, CA-98-3540-4-22) Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 16, 2000 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry Chester, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Henry Chester seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Chester , Nos. CR-94-665; CA-98- 3540-4-22 (D.S.C. Dec. 1, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED