alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEnergy Efficient Engine (E3) controls and accessories detail design reportAn Energy Efficient Engine program has been established by NASA to develop technology for improving the energy efficiency of future commercial transport aircraft engines. As part of this program, a new turbofan engine was designed. This report describes the fuel and control system for this engine. The system design is based on many of the proven concepts and component designs used on the General Electric CF6 family of engines. One significant difference is the incorporation of digital electronic computation in place of the hydromechanical computation currently used.Document ID19850021645Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBeitler, R. S.*(General Electric Co. Cincinnati, OH, United States)*Lavash, J. P.*(General Electric Co. Cincinnati, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1982Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberR82AEB400NAS 1.26:168017NASA-CR-168017Accession Number85N29957Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-20643Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850021645.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 960.18 Further proceedings. ( a ) Ordinarily, the determination of an award will be made on the basis of the written record. However, on request of either the applicant or Postal Service counsel, or on his or her own initiative, the adjudicative officer may order further proceedings, such as an informal conference, oral argument, additional written submissions, or an evidentiary hearing. Such further proceedings shall be held only when necessary for full and fair resolution of the issues arising from the application, and shall be conducted as promptly as possible. Whether or not the position of the agency was substantially justified shall be determined on the basis of the entire administrative record that is made in the adversary adjudication for which fees and other expenses are sought.
( b ) A request that the adjudicative officer order further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the information sought or the disputed issues and shall explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.
[46 FR 45945, Sept. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 6798, Mar. 5, 1987]
EXHIBIT 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF DELTA APPAREL, INC.
  (1)
    
    M. J. Soffe Co., a North Carolina corporation.(2)
    
    Junkfood Clothing Company, a Georgia corporation.(3)
    
    Delta Apparel Honduras, S.A., a Honduran sociedad anónima.(4)
    
    Delta Campeche, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican sociedad anónima de capital variable.(5)
    
    Delta Cortes, S.A., a Honduran sociedad anónima.(6)
    
    Campeche Sportswear, S de RL de CV, a Mexican sociedad de responsabilidad de capital variable.(7)
    
    Textiles La Paz, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company.(8)
    
    Ceiba Textiles, S de RL, a Honduran sociedad de responsabilidad limitada.(9)
    
    Atled Holding Company Honduras, S de RL, a Honduran sociedad de responsabilidad limitada.(10)
    
    LaPaz Honduras, S de RL, a Honduran sociedad de responsabilidad limitada.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1994
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINACIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1994
<CASH>                                              74
<SECURITIES>                                        58
<RECEIVABLES>                                       79
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         35
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   275
<PP&E>                                             300
<DEPRECIATION>                                      66
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               47
<BONDS>                                            340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       773
<SALES>                                             52
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   191
<CGS>                                               41
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     69
<INCOME-TAX>                                        26
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 43
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        43
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5409

To extend for 9 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of title

11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 6, 2000

Mr. SMITH of Michigan introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To extend for 9 additional months the period for which

chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

4 Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law

5 105–277, as amended by Public Law 106–5 and Public

6 Law 106–70, is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2000’’ each place it ap8 pears and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2001’’; and

9 (2) in subsection (a)—
2

•HR 5409 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘September 30, 1999’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘June 30, 2000’’; and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘October 1, 1999’’ and in4 serting ‘‘July 1, 2000’’.

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

7 on July 1, 2000.

Æ
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Final programmaticenvironmental impact statement for revision of the Coronado National Forestland and resource management plan [electronic resource].**
 
v1|v2 |v3
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.105/2:MB-R 3-05-16/V.1-3

Item Number: 0082-A-05 (online)

CGP systemNumber:001079480
September 12, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-62127-ALTMAN/Hunt

CHELSIA BLACKMON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice [ECF No. 21] in accordance 

with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, we hereby ORDER and

ADJUDGE that this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own fees and 

costs. This case shall remain CLOSED. All pending deadlines and hearings are TERMINATED, 

and any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 18, 2023.

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-62127-RKA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/19/2023 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


        We have issued our report dated August 22, 2001 (except for note F, as
to which the date is September 28, 2001), accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of The Credit Store, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2001. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of The
Credit Store, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-42278, filed July 26, 2000).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 15, 2001
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5378

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify the special rule

relating to continuous residence or physical presence under section

240A(d) of that Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 4, 2000

Mr. SMITH of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify

the special rule relating to continuous residence or physical presence under section 240A(d) of that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5378 IH

1 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF CONTINUOUS PRESENCE

2 FOR PURPOSES OF CANCELLATION OF RE3 MOVAL UPON COMMISSION OF OFFENSE

4 RENDERING ALIEN INADMISSIBLE OR DE5 PORTABLE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 240A(d)(1) of the Immi7 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1229b(d)(1)) is

8 amended by striking ‘‘referred to in section 212(a)(2)’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 subsection (a) shall apply to aliens who are in proceedings

11 under the Immigration and Nationality Act on or after

12 the date of the enactment of this Act if those proceedings

13 have not resulted in a final administrative order before

14 such date.

Æ
#### § 101-26.308 Obtaining filing cabinets.

Each agency head, after taking actions prescribed in § 101-25.302-2, shall determine agency requirements for filing cabinets. When additional filing cabinets are required, requisitions shall be submitted in FEDSTRIP format to the GSA region supporting the geographic area in which the requisitioning agency is located.

[43 FR 22211, May 24, 1978]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the financial
statements included in Part I, Item 1 of Form 10-Q dated September 30, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             217
<SECURITIES>                                        36
<RECEIVABLES>                                      173
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4
<INVENTORY>                                         57
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   515
<PP&E>                                             533
<DEPRECIATION>                                     138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              110
<BONDS>                                            933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,798
<SALES>                                            336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   603
<CGS>                                              120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    123
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 81
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        81
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>5
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           90579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 90579
<PP&E>                                           84987
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  866149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           320410
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     127000
<COMMON>                                       1868511
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1449772)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    866149
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                535719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (535719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (535719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (535719)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERNET LAW LIBRARY, INC. AS OF 9-30-00 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         141,798
<SECURITIES>                                   155,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,207
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               604,329
<PP&E>                                      20,055,982
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,882,671
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,777,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,481,670
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,470,000
<COMMON>                                       155,957
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,670,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,777,640
<SALES>                                        724,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               724,232
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,686,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,022,065)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,022,065)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KATARIUS BRANTLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-443

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case Nos.. 14000640 

CF10A and 14004347 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and J. Woodson Isom, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 963.8 Change of place of hearing. Not later than the date fixed for the filing of the answer, a party may file a request that a hearing be held to receive evidence in his or her behalf at a place other than that designated for hearing in the notice. The party shall support his or her request with a statement outlining: ( a ) The evidence to be offered in such place;
( b ) The names and addresses of the witnesses who will testify;
( c ) The reasons why such evidence cannot be produced at Arlington, VA.
The presiding officer shall consider the convenience and necessity of the parties and the relevance of the evidence to be offered. [52 FR 18912, May 20, 1987, as amended at 62 FR 4459, Jan. 30, 1997; 63 FR 66053, Dec. 1, 1998]
§ 960.3 Proceedings covered. ( a ) The Act applies to adversary adjudications conducted by the Postal Service. These are: ( 1 ) Adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of the Postal Service is presented by an attorney or other representative who enters an appearance and participates in the proceeding (for the Postal Service, the types of proceedings generally covered are proceedings relative to false representation and cease and desist orders and mailability under chapter 30 of title 39, U.S.C., with the exception of proceedings under 39 U.S.C. 3008); and
( 2 ) Appeals of decisions of contracting officers made pursuant to section 6 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 605) before the Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals as provided in section 8 of that Act. (41 U.S.C. 607).
( b ) The Postal Service may also designate a proceeding not listed in paragraph (a) of this section as an adversary adjudication for purposes of the Act by so stating in an order initiating the proceeding or designating the matter for hearing. The failure to designate a proceeding as an adversary adjudication shall not preclude the filing of an application by a party who believes the proceeding is covered by the Act; whether the proceeding is covered will then be an issue for resolution in proceedings on the application.
( c ) If a proceeding includes both matters covered by the Act and matters specifically excluded from coverage, any award made will include only fees and expenses related to covered issues.
[46 FR 45945, Sept. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 6798, Mar. 5, 1987; 67 FR 62179, Oct. 4, 2002]
§ 101-30.102 Objectives. The objectives of the Federal cataloging program are: ( a ) To provide for the maintenance of a uniform Federal supply catalog system and the conversion to and exclusive use of this system by all Federal agencies.
( b ) To name, describe, identify, classify, and number each item of personal property to be included in the Federal Catalog System so that the same items will have a single Federal item identification within and among the organizational elements of all Federal agencies.
( c ) To collect, maintain, and publish such Federal catalog data and related supply management data as may be determined necessary or desirable to reflect such benefits to supply management as: ( 1 ) Assistance in standardization of supplies and equipment;
( 2 ) Disclosure of interchangeability and substitutability of items;
( 3 ) Reduction in inventories of stock and increased rates of turnover;
( 4 ) Increase in vendor competition and broader sources of supply;
( 5 ) Provision of data for determining the most effective and economical method of item management on a Federal agency systemwide basis;
( 6 ) Enhance item entry control;
( 7 ) Facilitation of better interagency and intra-agency use of supplies, equipment, and excess stocks, and more exact identification of surplus personal property; and
( 8 ) Assistance in providing precise statistics for budget and financial accounting purposes.
[29 FR 16004, Dec. 1, 1964, as amended at 36 FR 20292, Oct. 20, 1971; 41 FR 11308, Mar. 18, 1976]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRIAN PHILIP BENNETT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No s . 13 & 14 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28 th day of April , 2023, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file a

Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.
#### § 101-29.301-4 Periodic review of Federal product descriptions.

The Assistant Administrator for Federal Supply and Services is responsible for establishing a program for periodically reviewing Federal product descriptions to determine whether revision, cancellation or reauthorization (validation) is appropriate. The frequency of the review shall be based on the degree of change in the technology of the product covered by the description and shall be conducted at least once every 5 years.