alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                                            NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

                                                        EXHIBIT 11

                                                                   THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED        THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
                                                                ---------------------------  ----------------------------
                                                                  March 3,     February 25,     March 3,     February 25,
                                                                   2007           2006           2007           2006
                                                                -----------  --------------  ------------  --------------
<S>                                                             <C>          <C>             <C>           <C>

Net income (loss) for computing income (loss) per common share  $    52,298  $     (50,087)  $     75,876  $     (87,230)
                                                                ===========  ==============  ============  ==============


Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding during each period                                    790,842        800,879        791,920        801,456
                                                                ===========  ==============  ============  ==============


Net income (loss) per common share                              $     0.066  $      (0.063)  $      0.096  $      (0.109)
                                                                ===========  ==============  ============  ==============
</TABLE>
26.11.06.14 Page 1 of 1 

Trv Another Pa ze IReturn to Main COMAR Search Page 

26.l1. 06.14 

.14 Control of PSD Sources. 

A. Definition. 

(I) In the following provisions, "Administrator" has the meaning set forth in §A(2) of this regulation: 

(a) 40 CFR §52.2 1(b)(3)(iii)(a), (17), (37)(i) and (iii), (43), (48)(ii), (50)(i), (51); 

(b) 40 CFR §52.2 1(g)( I),(2),(4),(5),and (6); 

(c) 40 CFR §52.2 1(i)(l )(x); 

(d) 40 CFR §52 .21(1)(2); 

(e) 40 CFR §52.21(o)(3); 

(f) 40 CFR §52 .21( p)(1) and (2); 

(g) 40 CFR §52.2 1(s); 

(h) 40 CFR §52.21(t); and 

(i) 40 CFR §52.2 I(u)(1)(3) and (4). 

(2) Term Defined. "Administrator" means the Adm inistrator ofthe United States Environmental Protection Agency. 

B. Genera l Requ ireme nts. 

( I) A person may not construct, modify, or operat e, or cause to be con structed, mod ified, or operated, a Prevention of 

Sign ificant Deteri oration (PSD) source, as defi ned in COMAR 26.11.01.01 B(37), which will result in violatio n of any 

provision of 40 CFR §52.2 1, as published in the 2008 edition. 

(2) The revi ewing auth ority is the Departm ent instead of the Admin istrator un less otherwi se speci fied in 40 CFR 

§52.1116, and the applicable procedures are those set forth in COMA R 26.1 1.02. 

http://www.d sd.state .md.us/comar/getfile.aspx?file=26.11.06.14.htm 7/27/2009
BUYER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT VARIABLES





between





THE BOEING COMPANY





and





AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.








Supplemental Exhibit BFE1 to Purchase Agreement Number 3219








P.A. No. 3219                                                            BFE1  SA-2
 PA_Supp_Ex_BFE1 Rev.: 4/10/07
 BOEING PROPRIETARY


BUYER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT VARIABLES





relating to





BOEING MODEL 787 AIRCRAFT








This Supplemental Exhibit BFE1 contains vendor selection dates, on-dock dates and other requirements applicable to the Aircraft.





1.           Supplier Selection.





Customer will select and notify Boeing of the suppliers of the following items by the following dates:








[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]











2.           Certification Document.





[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].








3.     Import





Customer will insure that Customer’s BFE suppliers provide sufficient information to enable Boeing, when acting as Importer of Record for Customer’s BFE, to comply with all applicable provisions of the U.S. Customs Service.








P.A. No. 3219BFE1-1SA-2
 PA_Supp_Ex_BFE1
 BOEING PROPRIETARY





4.           Delivery Dates and Other Information





[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]:








Item                                                              Preliminary On-Dock Dates








Premium Class (PC) Seats
[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]








Lifevests[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]


(As specified in Option Number ____________)








Galley Meal Carts[CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]





(As specified in Option Number ____________)








P.A. No. 3219BFE1-2SA-2
 PA_Supp_Ex_BFE1
 BOEING PROPRIETARY
#### § 101-27.207 Control and inspection.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

CERTIFICATION OF JESSICA STEBBINS BINA

Jessica Stebbins Bina, Esquire, pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing the Admission, 

Practice, Peer Review, and Discipline of Attorneys, hereby certifies that: (1) I have studied the 

Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; (2) I am a 

member in good standing of the Bar of the District of California since 2007; and (3) I have not 

filed three or more motions for pro hac vice admission in this District within the last 365 days.

/s/ Jessica Stebbins Bina

 Jessica Stebbins Bina

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 41-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
Case 9:22-cv-81758-XXXX Document 1-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/11/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:22-cv-81758-XXXX Document 1-16 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/11/2022 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA   Document 129   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA   Document 129   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 2 of 2
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK *v.*JOHN DOLAN.

*Grandjury*— irregularity *in summoning jurors for*— presumption *as to.*

The prisoner, upon his trial, in the Court of Oyer and Terminer, for murder, interposed a plea in abatement, alleging that the grand jury by which he was indicted was irregularly organized, for. the reason that some of its members were not on the list of petit jurors prepared by Douglas Taylor, the commis- ' sioner of jurors. It did not appear by the plea how the names of the'persons not on the list were placed among those to be summoned, nor how, nor by whom, the names of the persons summoned, sworn and acting as grand jurors were drawn. *Held,*that the plea was properly overruled; that in the absence of all averments upon the subject, it was to be presumed that the names were drawn by some person acting in the capacity of commissioner of jurors, and that he, in form, certified what had been done by him in the execution of that authority to the sheriif.

It is sufficient, to maintain the authority oi the grand jury to investigate criminal charges and find indictments valid in their nature, that the body acted under color of lawful authority.

Motion for writ of error to the Court of Oyer and Terminer, to review the conviction of the applicant of murder, with stay of proceedings.

*B. K. Phelps*and *D. G. Rollins,*for plaintiffs. *W. F. Howe,*for prisoner.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., concurred.

Motion denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants.

________________________________________/

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Gerald E. Greenberg of the law firm Gelber Schachter & 

Greenberg, P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Sam Bankman-Fried, and requests that all 

papers served in this case also be delivered to and served at the addresses set forth below.

Dated: March 8, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/Gerald E. Greenberg

GERALD E. GREENBERG

Florida Bar No. 440094

ggreenberg@gsgpa.com

ADAM M. SCHACHTER

Florida Bar No. 647101

aschachter@gsgpa.com

GELBER SCHACHTER & GREENBERG, P.A. 

SunTrust International Center 

One Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 2600

Miami, Florida 33131 

Telephone: (305) 728-0950

E-service: efilings@gsgpa.com

Counsel for Defendant Sam Bankman-Fried

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 83 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/08/2023 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA; Future Flight Data Collection Committee

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for the 
Future Flight Data Collection Committee meeting to be held July 6, 
2000, starting at 9:00 a.m. This new activity is to investigate future 
flight recorder concepts and requirements, thereby facilitating future 
regulatory requirements, opportunities for voluntary initiatives and 
the necessary protection of collected data. The meeting will be held at 
RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036.
    The agenda will include: (1) Welcome, Introductory and 
Administrative Remarks; (2) Review of Meeting Agenda; (3) RTCA 
Functional Overview; (4) Review of FAA flight Data Recorder 
Specifications and Regulations; (5) Industry Speakers; (6) Terms of 
Reference Overview; (7) Identify Goals, Develop Work Program and 
Examine Milestones; (8) Assign Tasks and Workgroups; (9) Other 
Business; (10) Establish Agenda for Next Meeting; (11) Date and 
Location of Next Meeting; (12) Closing.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements, obtain information or pre-register for the committee should 
contact the RTCA Secretariat, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, 
Washington, DC 20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax). 
Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee 
at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 12, 2000.
Jane P. Caldwell,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 00-15281 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5289 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5289

                For the relief of Moise Marcel Sapriel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2000

 Mr. Pascrell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Moise Marcel Sapriel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MOISE MARCEL SAPRIEL.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Moise Marcel Sapriel shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Moise Marcel Sapriel enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Moise Marcel Sapriel, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Moise Marcel 
Sapriel shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Thomas’ Administrator.

(Decided October *12,*1916.)

Petition by Appellant for a Eehearing.

GEORGE G. BROCK, H. J. JOHNSON and B. D. WARFIELD for appellant.

J. M. ROBSION for appellee.

Eesponse by

Judge Clarke

to Petition oe Appellant e©r a Eehearing.

Since the opinion herein was rendered, the Supreme Court of the United States has reversed judgments of this court in the cases of C. *& O.*Ry. Co. v. Kelly’s Admr., and C. *& O.*Ry. Co. v. Gainey, 241 U. S. ............, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 630 and 635, upon the ground that the measure of damages in those actions, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, was not correctly defined. The instruction herein did not limit a recovery to the present value of future contributions by decedent to his dependent parents, and upon that question is substantially the same as those disapproved in the above cases, and this is an action under the same act, but the instruction given in this case was substantially the same upon the question involved as the one offered by appellant, and the question raised and upon which the judgments of this court were reversed by the United States Supreme Court in the two eases referred to above, was not in any way suggested or presented upon the trial of this case. The instruction given by the trial court being the same in substance upon the question involved as the one offered by appellant, it cannot under our practice complain here. C., St. L. & N. O. R. Co. v. Hollis, 91 S. W. 258; Louisville Water Co. v. Phillips, 139 Ky. 614; Central Traction Co. v. Combs, 143 Ky. 529; Camden Interstate Ry. Co. v. Lester, 118 S. W. 268: L. & R. R. Co. v. Hardin, 117 S. W. 381.

The petition for a rehearing is overruled.'
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Duke Realty Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”) on Form10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew A. Cohoat,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of the operations of the Partnership.

 
|   | /s/   Matthew  A. Cohoat                                                    |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Matthew A. Cohoat                                                                          |
|   | Executive Vice  President and  Chief Financial Officer of the    General Partner |
|   | Date:  March  14, 2006                                                           |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Duke Realty Limited Partnership, and will be retainedby Duke Realty Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Factors Affecting Earnings in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

              																	Taylor, Cora E.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Factors Affecting Earnings in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 881*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1946,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4336,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 80.1150 Arcata-Humboldt Bay, CA.

A line drawn from Humboldt Bay Entrance Light 4 to Humboldt Bay Entrance Light 3.

[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5362 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5362

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 10 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To increase the amount of fees charged to employers who are petitioners 
    for the employment of H-1B non-immigrant workers, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITIES RELATING TO THE IMPOSITION OF FEES.

    Section 214(c)(9) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1184(c)(9)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``(excluding'' and all 
        that follows through ``2001)'' and inserting ``(excluding any 
        employer that is a primary or secondary education institution, 
        an institution of higher education, as defined in section 
        101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a), 
        a nonprofit entity related to or affiliated with any such 
        institution, a nonprofit entity which engages in established 
        curriculum-related clinical training of students registered at 
        any such institution, a nonprofit research organization, or a 
        governmental research organization) filing before October 1, 
        2003''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``$500'' and inserting 
        ``$1000''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1(2) shall apply only to petitions 
that are filed on or after the date that is 2 months after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
| Reference: |   (a) | Purchase Agreement No. 3219 (the Purchase Agreement) between The Boeing Company (Boeing) and American Airlines, Inc. (Customer) relating to Model 787-923 aircraft (the Aircraft) |
|------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            | (b) |     Purchase Agreement No. 1979 between The Boeing Company and American Airlines, Inc. relating to Model 767-323ER aircraft |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|           |   (c) |   Purchase Agreement No. 1980 between The Boeing Company and American Airlines, Inc relating to Model 777-223IGW aircraft |
|--------------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      (d) |     Security Agreement dated October 16, 2002, as subsequently amended, between The Boeing Company and American Airlines, Inc. |
|--------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

| 1.   | [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED |
|----------------|-------------------------------|

| 2.   | AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE |
|----------------|-------------------------------|

| 3.   | COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST |
|----------------|----------------------------------|

| 4.   | FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] |
|----------------|-----------------------------|