Begin forwarded message:

From: Parker Plaza <pploudspeaker@gmail.com>

Date: August 13, 2021 at 12:31:27 PM EDT

Subject: Notes from the open meeting

Notes from the open mee-ng of concerned owners Notes from the open mee-ng of concerned owners

The latest open mee-ng of concern owners took place August 11, 2021, at 7PM in the lobby 

of our building. The main intents of such owners’ mee-ngs are informa-onal and educa-onal. The

main goal of these mee-ngs - successfully (in short period of -me with op-mal expenses) renovate 

our home and provide maximum benefits to our residents. These mee-ngs are open to all residents. 

For instance, two Board members (Mr. Collazo and Mr. Leiva), as well as our manager (Mr. Zemnovich) 

also par-cipated in the latest mee-ng. 

The mee-ng should provide available truthful informa-on, based on public records, our office 

records, and other available sources. The mee-ng should help: (i) our residents to beRer understand

the exis-ng problems; and (ii) our board to become fully transparent with owners, follow our By-laws, 

build beRer rela-onship with management, and owners. 

At the latest mee-ng the par-cipants were informed that currently five apartments of the 

Board members are on sale, and one apartment is already sold. Two members of the Board are 

recently resigned from the Board. The Secretary of the Board received three city code viola-ons 

including one civil viola-on. The Vice-President and another Director of the Board received two and

one code viola-ons, correspondingly. Par-cipants of the mee-ng concluded that such a behavior of 

incompliance with the city code regula-ons is disgraceful and incompa-ble with Florida Statutes, our 

By-laws, Code of Ethics and requires immediate resigna-on from the Board: violators cannot enforce 

associa-on Rules and Regula-ons. 

The par-cipants raised ques-on whether the Board members used contractors, hired by 

Associa-on, and/or our maintenance personnel to perform general construc-on, plumbing, electrical, 

and other work in their apartments. The par-cipants were informed that Florida Statues have 

provisions of civil and criminal charges for members of the Board who use Associa-on resources for 

personal gain. The Florida Statues prohibit the maintenance personnel to perform work in residen-al 

apartments and that maintenance personnel are obligated to maintain and improve associa-on 

common elements, maintain structural elements in the good condi-on to prevent the Surfside-like 

tragedy. Finally, Florida Statues allows members of Associa-on to sue dis-nct members of the Board 

for breach of their fiduciary du-es. 

The mee-ng informed that during the last two years our Board allowed to addi-onally spend 

more than $4,000,000.00 on the (ques-onable) change orders, requested by CTC. Please note, 

according to the original contract, the CTC should get $5,100,000.00 for the whole stucco restora-on

and balcony repairing project, but now it will cost us more than $9,100,000.00 to be paid just for the 

CTC work. In addi-on to this, any extension of the work will cost us addi-onal $55,000,00 per month 

to be paid to the Engineer on Record and to the Owner Rep. Moreover, Board allowed unlawful

spending of more than $900,000.00 of our budget on renova-on of residen-al apartments (including

COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "G"

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 1 of 15
spending of more than $900,000.00 of our budget on renova-on of residen-al apartments (including

apartments of the board members). The owners were informed that our fire doors installa-on project

completely failed for unknown to owners’ reason, and board wasted again thousands and thousands

of owner’s moneys. Altogether, it caused a huge special assessment deficit, major project delay (due

to lack of funds) and soon, it will cause unnecessary and unexpected addi-onal special assessments. 

The mee-ng par-cipants challenged performance of the Owner Representa-ve (currently,

Collier Interna-onal). Collier should represent the best interest of our Associa-on. However, the

constant viola-ons of -meframe of implemen-ng the main project (balconies concrete restora-on

and stucco repair), total acceptance of mul-ple (now 131 or more) changes of order (suggested by

our main contractor, CTC), genera-ng addi-onal projects that largely benefit Collier and CTC, make

ques-onable the necessity of further use of this company. 

 The owners were informed that our management company (FSR) has ini-ated an addi-onal

short fall of our opera-ng budget by making a huge increase of cost of its service. This increase was

done without official approval of the Board. The par-cipants stated that the performance of the FSR

has become extremely expensive and very unsa-sfactory. 

The par-cipants of the mee-ng noted that Mr. Collazo (the President of the current and two

preceding Boards) runs our Associa-on as his own business on the money of our Associa-on, and that

the current management company (FSR) and Mr. Zemnovich (the property manager) are unable to

properly manage and maintain associa-on. 

The par-cipants of the mee-ng were informed that in situa-ons where the management

company and the Board cannot properly conduct associa-on business, the owners can file a pe--on

to the court for an injunc-on and for appoin-ng a receiver (a neutral person who would temporarily

carry out the associa-on business). The receiver will perform func-ons of both the Board and the

property manager. The difference would be that the receiver is a court-appointed professional who is

obligated to report to the judge on ongoing progress. The cost of the receiver service is very high, but,

in a long term, it could save a lot of money and -me. The par-cipants decided to con-nue discussing

this posibility on the open mee-ngs to be adver-sed on the Parker Plaza Owners Facebook and by

emails.

IGOR - Ini-a-ve Group of Owners and Residents

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 2 of 15
Begin forwarded message:

From: Parker Plaza <pploudspeaker@gmail.com>

Date: August 23, 2021 at 7:34:08 AM EDT

To: Undisclosed recipients:;

Subject: STOP CREATING NEW PROJECTS UNTIL THE CURRENT PROJECT IS COMPLETED!

Dear Neighbors and Friends Dear Neighbors and Friends,

On Tuesday, August 24th our Board, and our Management company (FSR) are organizing

the Town Hall MeeFng. Agenda of that meeFng states that the Owner’s

RepresentaFve/Project Manager, Colliers InternaFonal, will tell us what needs to be done

to get the 50-Years RecerFficaFon of our building. However, it is unclear how and why

(without any approval by the Board) Colliers became involved in the work associated with

the 50-Year RecerFficaFon of our building. Colliers and our contractor (CTC) supposed to

concentrate on finishing the ongoing Concreate RestoraFon Project. Instead of this, Colliers

and CTC are essenFally iniFaFng new, very expensive projects that will require addiFonal

special assessments. 

There is no doubt that our building will need to go through 50 Years recerFficaFon process,

but it needs to be done smart, with mulFple bids from independent engineers and

contractors. The involvement of Colliers and the CTC will create a conflict of interest and

will lead to sharp cost overruns and further delays in the implementaFon of the Concreate

RestoraFon Project.

Note, a half year ago, the Board fired previous owner representaFve (AMICON) and hired

new owner representaFve (Colliers) to help our AssociaFon to finish the Concreate

RestoraFon Project. However, Colliers totally failed to properly perform their duFes and

their parFcipaFon in the Concreate RestoraFon Project became counterproducFve (even

worth than AMICON). Now, instead of focusing on the Concreate RestoraFon

Project, Colliers, with support of our management company (FSR) and Board, has begun

working on other self-benefiFng mulFmillions projects, such as garage repair, 50 years

recerFficaFon, SLS, etc. These projects go far beyond the main project (Balconies

Concreate RestoraFon).

Now, instead of represenFng our (owners’) interest, Colliers represents interest of CTC. So,

for instance, to demonstrate the need to expand the use of CTC, Colliers begun to

inFmidate us (owners) with the Surfside tragedy. So, on August 7, to demonstrate that our

building is in a criFcal condiFon, CTC (obviously with blessing of Collier) installed 42

addiFonal shoring in the garage area (see Picture below). Three days later, CTC have

removed the most of these shoring. It is not yet clear who ordered the CTC to remove

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 3 of 15
removed the most of these shoring. It is not yet clear who ordered the CTC to remove

most of these forFficaFons and how much our AssociaFon will pay the CTC and Colliers for

their a[empt to inFmidate us. In any case, it became clear that Collier and CTC are

interested in immediately iniFaFng new projects that will allow them to conFnue to

receive money from us for a long Fme. 

It is a serious violaFon of our Bylaws that the Board has allowed Colliers and CTC to work

on other projects without any bids, contracts, and approval of the Board at an open Board

meeFng. This is also outrageous that our manager, Mr. Zemnovich, who, as a licensed

professional, was supposed to protect our AssociaFon from illegal contractor’s acFviFes,

covers up and supports such acFviFes of the Colliers, CTC, and Board.

Our iniFaFve group of owners and residents (IGOR) encourage everyone to a[end the

Town Hall meeFng on Tuesday, August 24th. Please tell your neighbors and friends to be at

that meeFng. Please raise your voice before it's too late. Please note, the Colliers and CTC

are not interest in finishing the Concreate RestoraFon Project. Say to Board, our

management company (FSR), our manager (Mr. Zemnovich), Collier, and CTC: ”ENOUGH

IS ENOUGH! IS ENOUGH!”, “STOP LYING TO US! STOP LYING TO US!”, "STOP CREATING NEW PROJECTS UNTIL THE STOP CREATING NEW PROJECTS UNTIL THE

CURRENT PROJECT IS COMPLETED! CURRENT PROJECT IS COMPLETED!", “STOP INTIMIDATING US! STOP INTIMIDATING US!”

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 4 of 15
Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 5 of 15
---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Parker Plaza <pploudspeaker@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, Aug 30, 2021, 3:44 PM

Subject: Can we trust our clowns?

To: 

Sa#re and Humor (with tears in eyes)

Can we trust our clowns? Can we trust our clowns?

One member of our associa#on is asking another:

“Are you going to par#cipate in the next Board mee#ng, which will be held tomorrow? At that mee#ng

our Board will request Reimbursement for Mold Remedia#on Expenditure as of 2018-2021.”

” Yes, it will be fun to see (with tears in eyes) how our clowns jus#fy spending nearly $1 M from our

Budget for Special Assessment of 2020, aimed for execu#on of Stucco Restora#on and Balcony Repairing

Project to renovate individual apartments."

“To jus#fy these wrongdoings, our LiXle Clown (Manager) has repeatedly men#oned two excuses: (i) the

wrongdoings were ini#ated by the previous Board; and (ii) it was dictated by the emergency and healththreatening needs.”

“But these excuses are absolutely absurd. The previous Board, which was elected in February of 2019 has

nothing to do with the Special Assessment 2020, which began in March of 2020, when the current Board

came in power. What's more, a^er all, nothing can jus#fy using the Special Assessment Budget not

according to its purpose.”

“Why the LiXle Clown defends wrongdoings of the current Board?”

“He protects his employment. One hand washes the other.”

“But, one can challenge this clown?”

“Yes, but remember when one argues with an idiot, it becomes a dispute between two idiots." 

“OK, I will ask our President (Big Clown) directly: how it’s come that under your leadership more than $6.7

M was overspent?”

 “Wow, can you provide factual data?”

“Of course: (i) more than $4.2M were spent on 135+ Change Orders requested by our Contractor, CTC; (ii)

more than $1M of our assessment money were unlawfully used on the renova#on of individual

apartments (including apartments of the members of the Board); and (iii) our opera#ng budget deficit has

exceeded $1.5 M.”

“OK, in turn, I would ask the Big Clown: why did he (solely, without Board’s approval) change the contract

with our management company (FSR), which increased our spending by almost $400,000.00 per year.

“I would also ask the Big Clown: How he allowed falsifica#on of some Associa#ons records?"

“I would advise our neighbors and friends: don’t sell your apartments, don't let ignorant people,

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 6 of 15
“I would advise our neighbors and friends: don’t sell your apartments, don't let ignorant people,

scammers, LiXle and Big Clowns brainwash you, use your money uncontrollably and ruin your life! Hold

these people accountable!" 

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 7 of 15
---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Parker Plaza <pploudspeaker@gmail.com>

Date: Sun, Nov 14, 2021, 10:56 AM

Subject: How long should we tolerate ALL of this?

To: 

Meeting of Concerned Owners will take place Wednesday, November 17 @ 7:00 PM in the

Lobby of Parker Plaza.

AGENDA:

1. Our Rights are being abused: President and Board have not responded to the official

request of 163 voters (more than 31% of All voters) to convene a Special Meeting to consider an

Alternate Budget.

2. Our Money are being misused: More than $2,140,000.00 from our Operating and

Assessment Budgets was already misused by the current Board. Now, the Board and the

Management Company are prepared to use the Reserve Funds ($2,000,000,00) as a piggy bank

for financing undisclosed yet projects.

3. The proposed changes of our Bylaws will infringe on the rights of ordinary voters

and benefit the members of the current Board. “To vote, or not to vote. This is the question.”

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 8 of 15
FW LOAN IS WRONG FOR PARKER PLAZA!.htm[8/25/2022 5:17:19 PM]

Subject: FW: LOAN IS WRONG FOR PARKER PLAZA!

-------- Original message --------

From: Freedom PPA <freedom4ppa@gmail.com>

Date: 8/19/22 9:06 AM (GMT-05:00)

To: Freedom PPA <freedom4ppa@gmail.com>

Subject: LOAN IS WRONG FOR PARKER PLAZA!

Dear Parker Plaza Unit Owners,

Board must STOP pushing for the loan and STOP all the threats. Unit owners must make their own

educated decision.

LOAN IS A TRAP!

· Everyone will become a part of that loan without any exceptions and any escape.

· It will lead Parker Plaza to a possible financial crash.

· Bank will be the actual owner of Parker Plaza.

· Obtaining personal new loans and refinancing of existing loans will become almost impossible.

ASSESSMENTS ARE THE RIGHT WAY!

Paying 35K immediately does not make any reasonable sense. There is no EMERGENCY and thus

there is no immediate need for such a huge amount of money.

To introduce a new assessment Board must follow a certain guideline:

All capital projects require a plan with a timeline. Period.

Any project is being developed over time and so should be its assessment. Period.

BEFORE THE START, DURING IMPLEMENTATION and UPON COMPLETION any project must

be explained thru proper project management tools and financial reports.

Unit owners should realize that the right mechanism of financing through assessments has been there

since the condo was created. It was outlined in detail in all Parker Plaza governing documents and it

was created this way for a reason: to protect us, the unit owners, from any possible financial issues and

wrongdoings associated with taking a loan. We already have an example of it in the past (loan of 2005)

and years later we are still painfully paying for it! ENOUGH!

ALL Unit Owners are for improving and fixing Parker Plaza. But it must be done in a REASONABLE and

JUSTIFIED way.

If the current BOD does not know or cannot do it RIGHT AND REASONABLE – LET THEM STEP

AWAY AND RESIGN.

Parker Plaza does have well qualified people who can do it honestly, much less expensive, faster, with

better quality and WITHOUT SUCH HUGE FINANCIAL STRESS for the Unit Owners.

SUMMARY:

In our opinion the PROPERLY JUSTIFIED ASSESSMENT is the only right, fair, less

expensive, and financially safer tool for financing PP capital projects.

Don't be afraid of the Board threatening tactics!

DO NOT VOTE FOR ANY LOAN!

SUPPORT THE ASSESSMENT APPROACH!

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 9 of 15
FW LOAN IS WRONG FOR PARKER PLAZA!.htm[8/25/2022 5:17:19 PM]

Disclaimer. We respect your privacy. If you do not wish to receive our emails, please let us know and we will

remove your name from our list.

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 10 of 15
FW Response to BoD letters.htm[8/31/2022 6:58:07 PM]

Subject: FW: Response to BoD letters

From: Freedom PPA <freedom4ppa@gmail.com>

Date: August 29, 2022 at 7:45:35 PM EDT

To: Freedom PPA <freedom4ppa@gmail.com>

Subject: Response to BoD letters

Dear Parker Plaza Unit Owners,

On August 25, Parker Plaza Board of Directors (BoD) sent another “strong” note to the membership

followed by a new one on Sunday, August 28.

These and other recent BoD letters twist the facts while blaming others with providing false statements.

Judge by yourself.

The BoD letter dated 8/25 states: “Another false statement made [by freedom4PPA and pploudspeaker] is that the

Board will levy an assessment of $35,000 due at one time; this is not true and as we have stated several times, if we are

forced to levy an assessment, it will be payable over 3-4 years.”

However, the BoD letter dated 8/10 states:” As a reminder, if we do not receive 261 votes in favor of taking the

loan by August 22nd, we will be immediately assessing you in excess of $35,000 per unit. Payments for this assessment

will become due immediately upon the Board of Directors approving this assessment at an open board meeting at the

end of August 2022.”

The BoD letter on 8/25 states: “The real reason for the objections from freedom4ppa@gmail.com and the “false flag”

Parker Plaza pploudpeaker@gmail.com, is for those authors’ own personal gains...”

Which “personal gains”? Personal gains can only apply to the BoD. We all witnessed in one of the BoD

recent meetings the reckless Board’s approval of the repairs in the apartment of only one Board member.

That fact really displays the BoD’s intention to act toward their own interests.

One more “blame” from the same letter of 8/25: “Important facts omitted from freedom4ppa’s email are that every

unit owner will have an opportunity to pay off their own portion, and the loan will only be disbursed as the repairs are

made with bank approval”. We didn’t skip it, but rather we challenged this unclear item in our email dated

8/25. Moreover, we noted that we should pay on average more than$7K in 3 years for the LOC interest

only term. But what it means ”their own portion” remains a question. And how would unit owners have to

payoff and how much when selling their unit during the loan term? No answers. Just the blames and

accusations.

BoD keeps going by blaming that assessment way “ignores the fact that many of our owners live on fixed

incomes for which the payment of the assessments will invariably overwhelm them. This shows the true nature of the

groups freedom4ppa and pploudspeaker in that they do not consider the negative effects on others and simply care about

their own self-interest in exerting control within Parker Plaza”. Just amazing! How paying double (on average about

$80K”) is better than paying $40K? While giving the control of PP to the bank, reducing unit prices? If paying less is “selfinterest” we are sure majority will be for it.

BoD keeps playing with numbers. Somehow $27.4M became now >$15M. Really?

From the BoD letter on 8/28 follows that: “Either way, the repairs will cost approximately >$15 million.”

If that is the correct, why not to go with an assessment like the one in 2020 of $14.27M? BUT AGAIN,

quotes and justifications – first, then ASSESSMENT.

And FINALLY, where is the promised CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE?? Long overdue.

In summary it sounds like the current BoD is almost “saint”. However, let us look from the timing

perspective:

· Past. All problems, issues are related to the old Boards.

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 11 of 15
FW Response to BoD letters.htm[8/31/2022 6:58:07 PM]

· In present times – they blame everyone who has an alternative opinion: freedom4ppa,

pploudspeaker, members of previous Boards and even the unit owners who express their opinion

and are against the loan. Contractors and vendors are “bad” too as are getting changed every 1-2

years creating a huge mess and money losses.

· For future – just a mix of empty promises.

o PP Management Report on April 1. “Next week, the 11 line will be opened as the contractor

completes the South side.” Today is end of August and....?

o PP Management Announcement on May 27, 2022. “The restoration of balconies in stacks 06, 07,

26, & 27 has been postponed until the end of June.” Today is end of August and....?

o PP Management Report on July 13. “Taurus Chutes will commence working on the South side trash

chutes Thursday, July 14th at 8:30 AM, estimated completion date is Thursday, July 21st.” Today is end of

August and....?

All of the BoD “efforts” or better “mis-efforts” have one goal: get the MONEY. A LOT OF MONEY

and preferably thru the LOAN in ONE SHOT.

BoD must STOP threatening the community with immediate, or 3-years long unjustified >$35K per unit

assessment. If BoD will decide to go that way, BoD will effectively commit a “political suicide”. It will

leave the unit owners no choice but to trigger a process of the BOARD’S RECALL which is

provided by Florida laws.

CONCLUSION:

The current Board has proved it multiple times: it CAN’T BE TRUSTED with money,

even small money.

Only PROPERLY JUSTIFIED ASSESSMENT is the right, fair, less expensive, and

financially safer tool for financing PP capital projects.

Don't be afraid of the Board threatening tactics!

DO NOT VOTE FOR ANY LOAN!

SUPPORT THE ASSESSMENT APPROACH!

Disclaimer. We respect your privacy. If you do not wish to receive our emails, please let us know and we will

remove your name from our list.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Parker Plaza Estates <no-reply@parkerplaza.org>

Subject: Re: Loan - “Red Herring” from the Board and Investors

Date: August 28, 2022 at 2:23:22 PM EDT

To: michaelfagan@mac.com

Reply-To: Parker Plaza Estates <no-reply@parkerplaza.org>

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 12 of 15
FW Response to BoD letters.htm[8/31/2022 6:58:07 PM]

Re: Loan - “Red Herring” from the Board and Investors

Dear Parker Plaza Owners,

We promised not to go tit for tat on these emails; however, we just had to in this case. First, what in the

world is this email talking about? Red herrings and demagogic statements? Can these individuals just let

us deal with our pressing issues rather than their constant barrage of nonsense?

1. These groups claim to be presenting “detailed explanations” as to why the loan is a “trap” and why an

assessment is better. OK, but this is their personal opinion. We want to present owners with an option to

pay for the much-needed repairs over a long period of time so that they are not hit with a big assessment.

Either way, the repairs will be made. Either way, the repairs will cost approximately >$15 million. If

owners vote to pay for this over approx three years, then so be it. If owners do not want to have at least

the option to pay over 18 years instead of 3, then so be it. 

2. We notified the entire membership that we have hired a 3rd party accounting firm to properly account

for every single expense made as part of our special assessments since 2017. We also notified the entire

membership that this report would be ready in the coming days. PPLoudSpeaker writes below, “there is

no collection of proposals and selection of contractors for these projects.” As we have stated numerous

times, our professional Engineer of Record has outlined the entire scope of work that needs to be done,

we have put out an RFP (Request For Proposal), and bids are due in September. Once we have those

bids and have more information, we will be able to share this with the entire Membership. Right now, we

only have approximate guidance, which we have shared with all of you. You have the same information

that we have.

3. As for some prior board members neglecting our property, we maintain our statement. Prior boards did

not maintain our property over the years and didn’t repair the items which they inarguably should have.

And yes, it takes longer than three years to fix these major issues, which were caused over multiple

decades of neglect. 

4. Regarding the report that Mr. Sherman commissioned from SFPOC using GoFundMe and other

donations solicited around the condo: PPLoudSpeaker claims below that the conclusions reached in their

final report have “nothing to do with the allegations presented” in their lawsuit against the Association. Do

not be fooled: you are being lied to. These groups were specifically hired to look into wrongdoing, fraud,

and criminal activity by members of the Board for the exact items and exact same time period as their

lawsuit suggests. EXACT SAME TIME PERIOD. Their own experts concluded that there was NO FRAUD

and NO WRONGDOING, and NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. Notwithstanding their own evidence, Mr.

Sherman and others filed a suit against the Association for the exact same things that they knew never

happened - and they knew this because they themselves hired their own experts to uncover any

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 13 of 15
FW Response to BoD letters.htm[8/31/2022 6:58:07 PM]

wrongdoing! And all of this is costing all of us thousands of dollars of our association money to defend

against a frivolous lawsuit. 

Conclusion: please don’t be fooled. The loan option is far less harmful than a large assessment. And...

there are no outside investors - this is another figment of PPloudspeaker’s imagination. 

Respectfully,

Your Parker Plaza Board of Directors

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 14 of 15
FW Response to BoD letters.htm[8/31/2022 6:58:07 PM]

You’re receiving this email because you are a member of the Parker Plaza Estates community, 2030 South Ocean Drive, Hallandale Beach,

FL. Log in at https://www.parkerplazaestates.org

Case 0:22-cv-61638-WPD Document 21-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 15 of 15