alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

2001 4244 4256 4239 4391 4518 4055 3896 4168 4477 4502 4509 4582

2002 4777 4634 4617 4737 4528 4083 4002 4199 4792 4797 4793 4845

2003 4935 4957 5144 5045 4884 4276 4301 4636 5007 5021 5067 5215

2004 5171 5268 5313 5202 5146 4543 4427 4797 5305 4973 5140 5230

2005 5295 5401 5466 5479 5270 4614 4532 4920 5271 5063 5150 5333

2006 5525 5412 5573 5469 5237 4752 4557 4651 5259 5149 5148 5096

2007 5284 5371 5328 5500 5464 4740 4611 5028 5234 5359 5276 5475

2008 5425 5648 5592 5535 5199 4610 4468 4819 5291 5350 5458 5417

2009 5699 5540 5521 5466 5477 4904 4776 5224 5848 5980 6011 6192

2010 6279 6215 6263 6111 6040 5445 5326 5610 6136 6193 6142 6464

2011 6318 6250 6279 6380

Not in labor force

Number in thousands

20 to 24 years

2001 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU05000036

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Not in Labor Force, 20-24 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (03:09:41 PM)
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Annual

4320

4567

4874

5043

5149

5152

5223

5234

5553

6019

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 24, 2011 (03:09:41 PM)
<PAGE>

Exhibit 15.1

May 5, 2005


Aceto Corporation
Lake Success, New York

RE:     Registration Statements (No. 33-38679, No. 333-90929 and No. 333-110653)
        on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 5, 2005 related to our
review of interim financial information for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended March 31, 2005.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such report
is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Melville, New York
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-07-00007-CR

______________________________

CHARLES WHITLEY MICK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 8th Judicial District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0618765

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
Mick appeals from six convictions. In 06-07-00004-CR, he was convicted of aggravated 1

sexual assault on M.M. and sentenced to forty years' imprisonment (concurrent). In cause number

06-07-00005-CR, he was convicted of aggravated sexual assault on M.M. and sentenced to forty

years' imprisonment (concurrent). In cause number 06-07-00006-CR, he was convicted for

indecency with a child with J.H. and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment (concurrent). In cause

number 06-07-00007-CR, he was convicted of indecency with a child with J.H. and sentenced to

twenty years' imprisonment (concurrent). In cause number 06-07-00008-CR, he was convicted of

one count of indecency with a child with J.H. and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment

(concurrent), and one count of aggravated sexual assault on a child with J.H. and sentenced to forty

years' imprisonment (consecutive to 0618762 (06-07-00004-CR)). In cause number 06-07-00009-

CR, Mick was convicted of one count of aggravated sexual assault on J.H. and sentenced to forty

years' imprisonment (concurrent), and one count of indecency with a child with J.H. and sentenced

to twenty years' imprisonment (concurrent). In each conviction, the jury also assessed a $10,000.00

fine. 

Mick does not present a Confrontation Clause issue—M.M. testified at the trial. 2

2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Charles Whitley Mick appeals from his conviction by a jury for indecency with a child with

J.H. The jury assessed his punishment at twenty years' imprisonment and a $10,000.00 fine. Mick

presently has five other convictions currently on appeal before this Court.1

On appeal, Mick contends the trial court erred by admitting a video recording of an interview

by a state worker with another alleged victim, M.M. He argues that this error is reversible because

2

it leaves grave doubt that his conviction was free from the substantial influence of the error. 

We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on his appeal in cause number

06-07-00004-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has not been

shown.
3

We affirm the judgment. 

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: May 30, 2008

Date Decided: June 2, 2008

Do Not Publish
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 

CASE NO. 22-14368-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS 

 

THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MICHAEL BRADLEY, as Personal 

Representative of the Estate of CLAUDIA 

BRADLEY, deceased, DOCKSIDE VIEW, LLC, 

ON THE EDGE DOCKSIDE, LLC, TAYLOR 

ZEUS, KORI BYRD, and VICTORIA ROBINSON, 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

ORDER CLOSING CASE 

 THIS CAUSE comes before the Court sua sponte. On October 28, 2022, plaintiff filed a 

complaint against all defendants. On March 13, 2023, defendants Dockside View, LLC and On 

the Edge Dockside, LLC filed a motion to dismiss this case. (DE 33). On August 23, 2023, I 

granted the motion to dismiss, dismissed two motions for partial summary judgement as moot (DE 

79 and 81) and set a deadline of August 31, 2023 for the filing of any amended complaint. (DE 

98). I cautioned Plaintiff that if no timely amended complaint is filed, this case will be closed. As 

of this date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, nor have they sought an extension of 

time to do so. 

 “A district court has inherent authority to manage its own docket ‘so as to achieve the 

orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.’” Equity Lifestyle Props., Inc. v. Fla. Mowing & 

Landscape Serv., Inc., 556 F. 3d 1232, 1240 (11th Cir. 2009) (quoting Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 

Case 2:22-cv-14368-DMM Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2023 Page 1 of 2
2 

501 U.S. 32, 43 (1991)). Such authority includes the power to dismiss a case for failure to prosecute 

or for failure to comply with a court order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Id.

 Because Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and the deadline to do so has passed, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE. 

3. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, with the exception of DE 99, which the 

court will rule on in due course. 

SIGNED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 11 day of September, 2023. 

Donald M. Middlebrooks 

United States District Judge 

cc: Counsel of Record 

Case 2:22-cv-14368-DMM Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2023 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-6.212-4 Procedures, evidence, and record. ( a ) The hearing, decision, and any administrative review thereof shall be conducted in conformity with 5 U.S.C. 554-557 (sections 5-8 of the Administrative Procedure Act) and in accordance with such rules of procedure as are proper (and not inconsistent with this section) relating to the conduct of the hearing, giving of notices subsequent to those provided for in § 101-6.212-1, taking of testimony, exhibits, arguments and briefs, requests for findings, and other related matters. Both GSA and the applicant or recipient shall be entitled to introduce all relevant evidence on the issues as stated in the notice for hearing or as determined by the officer conducting the hearing at the outset of or during the hearing.
( b ) Technical rules of evidence shall not apply to hearings conducted pursuant to this subpart 101-6.2, but rules or principles designed to assure production of the most credible evidence available and to subject testimony to test by cross-examination shall be applied where reasonably necessary by the officer conducting the hearing. The hearing officer may exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by the parties and opportunity shall be given to refute facts and arguments advanced on either side of the issues. A transcript shall be made of the oral evidence except to the extent the substance thereof is stipulated for the record. All decisions shall be based upon the hearing record and written findings shall be made.
[29 FR 16287, Dec. 4, 1964, as amended at 38 FR 17974, July 5, 1973]
§ 501.10 Postage Evidencing System modifications. ( a ) An authorized provider must receive prior written approval from the director, Commercial Payment, of any and all changes made to a previously approved Postage Evidencing System. The notification must include a summary of all changes made and the provider's assessment as to the impact of those changes on the security of the Postage Evidencing System and postage funds. Upon receipt of the notification, Commercial Payment will review the summary of changes and make a decision regarding the need for the following: ( 1 ) Additional documentation.
( 2 ) Level of test and evaluation required.
( 3 ) Necessity for evaluation by a laboratory accredited by the National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP).
( b ) Upon receipt and review of additional documentation and/or test results, Commercial Payment will issue a written acknowledgement and/or approval of the change to the provider.
[78 FR 44439, July 24, 2013, as amended at 85 FR 21777, Apr. 20, 2020]
**Exhibit 32(c)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Georgia Power Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/Michael D. Garrett

Michael D. Garrett

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Cliff S. Thrasher

Cliff S. Thrasher

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  |

 

Date:  November 6, 2008
Re: EGU MACT -- Table of Costs and Benefits
12/16/2011 06:46 PM

From: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Coleman, Thomas (Volunteer)" <Thomas_M_Coleman@ceq.eop.gov>

Cortney, this version was updated on the 8th. I will review it concurrently with you but I was told it was up to date.

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Coleman, Thomas (Volunteer)" <Thomas_M_Coleman@ceq.eop.gov>
Date: 12/16/2011 06:38 PM Subject: EGU MACT -- Table of Costs and Benefits

I want to remind you to also provide the updated costs and benefits table/spreadsheet of data that needs to be uploaded into ROCIS to Amy Cole, the person who will upload the documents. Both costs and benefits have changed since the rule was submitted for review.

ROCIS_MATS_1216.xlsx
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, William L.
Walton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William L. WaltonName:
    William L. WaltonDate: August 5, 2005
§ 957.13 Proposed findings of fact. ( a ) The Hearing Officer may direct the parties to submit proposed findings of fact and supporting explanations within 15 days after the delivery of the official transcript to the Recorder who shall notify both parties of the date of its receipt. The filing date for proposed findings shall be the same for both parties.
( b ) Proposed findings of fact shall be set forth in numbered paragraphs and shall state with particularity all evidentiary facts in the record with appropriate citations to the transcript or exhibits supporting the proposed findings.
§ 89.18 Record of certification of vessels of special construction or purpose. ( a ) Copies of Certificates of Alternative Compliance and documentation concerning Coast Guard vessels are available for inspection at the offices of the Marine Transportation Systems Directorate, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (CG-5PW), Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.
( b ) The owner or operator of a vessel issued a Certificate shall ensure that the vessel does not operate unless the Certificate of Alternative Compliance or a certified copy of that Certificate is on board the vessel and available for inspection by Coast Guard personnel.
[CGD 80-187, 47 FR 13801, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended by CGD 88-052, 53 FR 25120, July 1, 1988; CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33663, June 28, 1996; CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33363, June 19, 1997; USCG-2002-12471, 67 FR 41332, June 18, 2002; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38431, July 7, 2014]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
   CERTIFICATION
 
 
 I, Gustavo Gomez, certify that:
 
 1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ITS Networks Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2004.2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); andc)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and6.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 
 ****Date: January 24, 2005
By:
/s/ Gustavo Gomez,Gustavo Gomez,Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ' 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Teleconnect Inc. (the A
Company @) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the A Report @), the
undersigned President and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the
Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ' 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 29, 2005       By: /s/ Gustavo Gomez
                                  Gustavo Gomez
                                  Chief Executive Officer,
                                  President and Treasurer


                              By: /s/ Herman de Haas
                                  Hermand de Haas
                                  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                  and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
#### § 101-39.004 Optional operations.

Nothing in this part shall preclude the establishment or operation of interagency fleet management systems by GSA or by other agencies which are to be operated on the basis of optional use by executive or other agencies under arrangements worked out between the agencies concerned and GSA.

[56 FR 59887, Nov. 26, 1991]
§ 101-26.602-5 Procurement of natural gas from the wellhead and other supply sources. ( a ) Natural gas requirements shall be satisfied from sources that are most advantageous to the Government in terms of economy, efficiency, and service. A cost/benefit analysis shall be required by the procuring Federal agency if the natural gas procurements at a facility exceed 20,000 mcf annually and the facility can accept interruptible service. If sources other than the local public utility are the most advantageous to the Government, agency requirements may be satisfied through the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). Arrangements for DLA procurements on behalf of civilian agencies shall be made through GSA. GSA will forward agency requests to DLA after assuring that necessary requirements data are included.
( b ) Agency requests for DLA natural gas shall be forwarded to the Public Utilities Division (PPU), Office of Procurement, General Services Administration, 18th and F Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20405. The requests shall include for each facility for which natural gas is required: The name, address, and telephone number of the requesting agency representative; the name, address, and telephone number of the facility representative; the name of the local distribution company; the expected usage (in mcf) at the facility for each month during the next year of service; the expected peak day usage in mcf at the facility; a statement of funds availability; and documentation of the cost analysis performed that justifies the alternative source procurement.
( c ) Agency requests for procurements by DLA shall be forwarded to GSA at the time the information specified in § 101-26.602-5(b) becomes available.
( d ) Agencies should anticipate that actions required by DLA to establish a natural gas contract will take 5 to 7 months.
[57 FR 21895, May 26, 1992]
§ 273.5 Investigations of alleged violations. ( a ) Investigations of allegations of liability under 31 U.S.C. 3802 shall be conducted by the Investigating Official.
( b ) ( 1 ) For purposes of an investigation under this part, the Investigating Official may issue a subpoena requiring the production of all information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and data not otherwise reasonably available to the Postal Service. Any subpoena issued by the Investigating Official under this authority shall cite 31 U.S.C. 3804(a) as the authority under which it is issued, shall be signed by the Investigating Official, and shall command each person to whom it is directed to produce the specified documentary material at a prescribed time and place.
( 2 ) In the case of contumacy or refusal to obey a subpoena issued pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the district courts of the United States have jurisdiction to issue an appropriate order for the enforcement of such subpoena. Any failure to obey such order of the court may be punishable as contempt. In any case in which the Postal Service seeks the enforcement of a subpoena under this section, the Postal Service shall request the Attorney General to petition the district court for the district in which the person receiving the subpoena resides or conducts business to issue such an order.
( c ) Upon completing an investigation under this part, the Investigating Official shall submit to the Reviewing Official a report containing the findings and conclusions of his investigation, including: ( 1 ) A description of the claims or statements for which liability under 31 U.S.C. 3802 is alleged;
( 2 ) A description of any evidence which supports allegations of liability under 31 U.S.C. 3802, or where applicable, a description of any evidence that tends to support a conclusion that such statute has not been violated;
( 3 ) An estimate of the amount of money or the value of property or services allegedly requested or demanded in violation of 31 U.S.C. 3802;
( 4 ) A statement of any exculpatory or mitigating circumstances which may relate to the claims or statements under investigation;
( 5 ) A statement of the amount of penalties and assessments that, considering the information described in paragraphs (c) (3) and (4) of this section, the Investigating Official recommends be demanded from the person alleged to be liable; and
( 6 ) An estimate of the prospects of collecting the amount specified in paragraph (c)(5) of this section, and any reasons supporting such estimate.
( d ) Nothing in these regulations modifies any responsibility of the Investigating Official to report violations of criminal law to the Attorney General
[52 FR 12901, Apr. 20, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 55825, Oct. 30, 1991]