alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  OF UNITED SURGICAL PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In
connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark A. Kopser, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:



| | /s/MARK A. KOPSER                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Mark A. Kopser
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### § 491.1 Authorized Agent to receive service.

Notwithstanding the designation, in § 2.2 of this chapter, of the General Counsel as agent for the receipt of legal process against the Postal Service, the sole agent for service of garnishment process directed to the pay of Postal Service employees and employees of the Postal Rate Commission (“employees”) is the Manager, Payroll Processing Branch, 2825 Lone Oak Parkway, Eagan, MN 55121-9650 (“Authorized Agent”). The Authorized Agent shall have sole authority to receive service of legal process in the nature of garnishment (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “process”) arising under the law of any state, territory, or possession, or the order of a court of competent jurisdiction of any state, territory, or possession (including any order for child support and alimony or bankruptcy). The Authorized Agent may not receive or transmit service of process in a private legal matter on behalf of an employee. No process shall be effectively served until it is received by the Authorized Agent or his designee. No other employee shall have the authority to accept service of such process. Service of process in conformity with Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 U.S.C. Appendix) is not waived for any suit or action wherein the Postal Service, its officers, or employees are parties. Any Order, issued in bankruptcy, for the withholding of sums from pay due an employee and which is directed to the Postal Service for handling outside the voluntary allotment procedure, is legal process subject to the provisions of these regulations.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2531
JOHN A. BRINKLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3090-MJG) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John A. Brinkley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Medical Ctr. , No. CA-97-3090- MJG (D. Md. Oct. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Roberto Martínez of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Golden State Warriors, LLC (“GSW”), and requests that all 

papers served in this case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following attorney appears on behalf of GSW in this 

action as required under the Rules, and is entering this appearance without prejudice to, or waiver 

of, GSW’s personal jurisdiction defense or any other defenses. This is not a general appearance in 

Garrison or any other action.

Dated: April 6, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Florida Bar No. 305596

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Golden State Warriors, LLC 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|By:  /s/ Keith J. Randall
|Keith J. Randall         
|Chief Financial Officer  
|October 29, 2010
[Cite as In re Continuing Legal Edn. Suspension of Haas, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2015-Ohio115.]

I N RE C ONTINUING L EGAL E DUCATION S USPENSION OF H AAS . [Cite as In re Continuing Legal Edn. Suspension of Haas, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2015-Ohio-115.] (No. CLE-2004-64540

— Submitted January 14, 2015

— Decided January 20, 2015.)
O N R EPORT OF THE C OMMISSION ON C ONTINUING L EGAL E DUCATION

.

____________________ {¶ 1} This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, in cluding the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 2002-2003 reporting period. {¶ 2} On April 8, 2005, this court a dopted the recommendation of the commission, imposed a sanction fee upon re spondent, and suspended respondent from the practice of law pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3) and (5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent would not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complied with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in former Gov.Bar R. X(7); complied with the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio; co mplied with the Apr il 8, 2005 order and all other orders of the court; and this court ordered respondent reinstated. {¶ 3} On January 9, 2015, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncomplian ce, has made up all deficiencies, and is now in fullS UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. The commission certified that respondent had completed the credit hours of continuing legal education required during the suspension by this c ourt’s order of suspension. Respondent has satisfied all the requi rements of this court’ s order of suspension. {¶ 4} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adopt ed and respondent, Sheila Ann Haas, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

________________________
#### § 101-49.000 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR chapter 102, parts 102-1 through 102-220).

For information on utilization, donation, and disposal of foreign gifts and decorations previously contained in this part, see FMR part 42 (41 CFR part 102-42).
9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 190-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/22/2022 Page 
22-cv-81294-AMC Document 190-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/22/2022 Pag
Case 9:22-cv-81758-XXXX Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/11/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:22-cv-81758-XXXX Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/11/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 946.4 Disposition of property of unknown owners. ( a ) Where no apparent owner of property subject to this part is known, except property described in § 946.3, and the Chief Postal Inspector or delegate estimates that the fair market value of the property exceeds $200, and the property is not needed as evidence, the Chief Postal Inspector or delegate must publish notice providing the following information: ( 1 ) A description of the property including model or serial numbers, if known;
( 2 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the Postal Inspector in Charge who has custody of the property; and
( 3 ) A statement inviting any person who believes that he or she is fully entitled to the property to submit a claim for its return with the Postal Inspector in Charge who is identified in the notice. Such claim must be submitted within 30 days from the date of first publication of the notice (See § 946.7).
( b ) The notice under § 946.4(a) must be published once a week for three consecutive weeks in a publication of general circulation within the judicial district where the Postal Inspection Service took possession of the property.
#### § 963.22 Public information.

The Librarian of the Postal Service maintains for public inspection in the Library copies of all initial, tentative, and final agency decisions and orders. The Recorder maintains the complete official record of every proceeding.

[52 FR 18912, May 20, 1987, as amended at 63 FR 66053, Dec. 1, 1998]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), Christopher S. Forno, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Christopher S. Forno
|Name:                    |  | Christopher S. Forno   
|Title:                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                    |  | May 7, 2008            

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or
as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
§ 961.3 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Employee* refers to a current employee of the Postal Service who is alleged to be indebted to the Postal Service; or to an employee of another Federal agency who is alleged to be indebted to that other creditor Federal agency and whose hearing under section 5 of the Debt Collection Act is being conducted under these rules.
( b ) *General Counsel* refers to the General Counsel of the Postal Service, and includes a designated representative.
( c ) *Hearing Official* refers to an Administrative Law Judge qualified to hear cases under the Administrative Procedure Act, an Administrative Judge appointed under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, or other qualified person not under the control or supervision of the Postmaster General, who is designated by the Judicial Officer to conduct the hearing under section 5 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 5514.
( d ) *Judicial Officer* refers to the Judicial Officer, Associate Judicial Officer, or Acting Judicial Officer of the United States Postal Service.
( e ) *Notice of Involuntary Administrative Salary Offsets Under the Debt Collection Act* refers to the formal written notice required by section 5 of the Debt Collection Act, including the provision of notice of the procedures under this Part, before involuntary collection deductions can be taken from an employee's salary.
( f ) *Postmaster/Installation Head* refers to the Postal Service official who is authorized under the Postal Service Employee and Labor Relations Manual to make the initial determination of employee indebtedness and to issue the “Notice of Involuntary Administrative Salary Offsets Under the Debt Collection Act.”
( g ) *Recorder* refers to the Recorder, Judicial Officer Department, U.S. Postal Service, located at 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201-3078. The Recorder's telephone number is (703) 812-1900, and the fax number is (703) 812-1901.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE & TIME:

Tuesday, June 13, 2000, 10 a.m., meeting closed to the public.

THIS MEETING WAS CANCELED.

# DATE & TIME:

Tuesday, June 20, 2000 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

 

                    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.                          ( print page 37563)    

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# DATE & TIME:

Thursday, June 22, 2000, at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. (ninth floor).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

 

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-10—America's Community Bankers Political Action Committee (COMPAC), Matthew D. Smyth, Director.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-11—Georgia-Pacific Corporation and the G-P Employees Fund of Georgia-Pacific by counsel, Jan Witold Baran.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2000-13—iNEXTV Corporation by counsel, John J. Duffy.

Administrative Matters.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Ron Harris, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 00-15267 Filed 6-13-00; 11:35 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### HIRAM POOL et al. *v.*ALBERT E. SAFFORD.

*Cha/mfeo'order of county*judge— *appeal from*— *can ority be taken after or dm'has been entered, in the county cleric’s office.*

Appeal by a receiver in the above-entitled action appointed in supplementary proceedings, from an order said to have been made at chambers, by the county judge of Cattaraugus county, that the said receiver account and show cause why an attachment should not issue against him for contempt.

*498The court at General Term said “ Tbe original judgment under wbicb tbe supplementary proceedings were instituted, was recovered in tbe Supreme Court. Tbe said order, if reviewed by tbis court, is to be reviewed in tbe same manner as if made by a judge of tbe Supreme Court. (Code, § 403.)

Sucb an ordei’, made out of court, cannot be reviewed on appeal, unless entered witb tbe clerk of tbe court. (Code, § 350.)

Tbe case contains no evidence that tbe order appealed from has ever been entered anywhere, and there is no evidence, sucb as tbe statute requires, that any sucb order has been made. Consequently, tbis court bas no jurisdiction to act upon tbe appeal, wbicb must therefore be dismissed.”

*J. M. Gongdon,*for appellant C. E. Marsh, receiver. *G. Z. Lmcohi,*for S. 0. Green, respondent.

’ Opinion by Talcott, J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Talcott and Smith, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, witb ten dollars costs and disbursements.
SPA Rental, LLC, 

DBA MSI Aviation 

Complainant, 

V. 

Somerset - Pulaski County Airport Board, 

Respondent. 

Docket No. AGC-16-13-02 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL AND BRIEF 

Complainant hereby directs a motion to extend the time provided for the filing of 

complainant's notice of appeal of the Director's Determination and brief as provided for in 14 CFR 

§ 16.33(b)(3)(c) until November 2, 2015. 

Page 1 of 3 

-< 

Reg. 0011186 

Tri I Counsel for Complainant 

130 West Second Street, Suite 1010 

Dayton, OH 45402 

Telephone: (937) 228-8363 

Facsimile: (937) 228-0520 

EMail: your_lawyer@ sbcglobal.net 
implemented during the two years that the Complaint was at issue.) 

A significant event which impacts the matter addressed in the Complaint has occurred since 

the filing of the Complaint: 

Somerset Regional Aviation, LLC., ceased operations at the end of June, 2015. Somerset 

Regional Aviation, LLC., is/was other the LFBO on the airport to which the respondent granted a 

lease with incentive subsidies. The Somerset Regional Aviation, LLC., lease included conditions 

which complainant deemed to be economically onerous violative of the FAA Minimum Standards, 

giving rise to the Complaint. Apparently, Somerset Aviation, LLC, did not find compliance with 

the conditions sufficiently remunerative to warrant continuing operations at the Lake Cumbrland 

Regional Airport. 

As the situation now stands, complainant employs the only FAA certified A & P mechanic 

on the airport property. To date, the respondent has not solicited new proposals. 

In addition to urging the anticipated appeal based upon the Directors' misapplication of the 

applicable standards and regulations, complainant seeks to demonstrate that the demise of Somerset 

Regional Aviation, LLC., was due to the respondent's imposition of economic requirements which 

a competing LFBO found unprofitable to satisfy, and thus provide additional new material pursuant 

to 14 CFR § 16.33(±) et. seq. 

Complainant believes that 45 days from the date of the within motion will be required to 

obtain the new necessary evidentiary materials required to support the appeal. 

Page 2 of 3 
Telephone: (937) 228-8363 

Facsimile: (937) 228-0520 

EMail: your_lawyer@ sbcglobal.net 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing Complainant's Motion for 

Extension was served upon Jessie Di Gregory, Office of the Chief Counsel, by emailing it to 

Jessie.DiGregory@faa.gov and upon FAA Docket Clerk, by emailing it to 9-A WA-AGC-PART16@faa.gov and upon Ms. Rachel Owsley by emailing it to rowsley@stites.com and upon Ms. 

Bethany Breetz by emailing it to bbreetz@stites.com o ep mber 15, 20 

Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

3427CD
------

                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                   OF

                        ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                   OF

                       GREAT BEAR INVESTMENTS, INC.



     The undersigned, ALAN WILSON and TANIS CORNWALL, do hereby certify as
follows:

     1. We are the President and Secretary of GREAT BEAR INVESTMENTS, INC., a
Nevada corporation.

     2. The original Articles of Incorporation of GREAT BEAR INVESTMENTS,
INC., were filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on March 12, 1999.

     3. That the Board of Directors of said corporation via an Action By
Unanimous Written Consent of Board of Directors effective as of July 20,
2000, adopted a resolution to amend the Articles of Incorporation of the
corporation as follows:

        ARTICLE FIRST is hereby amended to read as follows:
                -----

           FIRST: The name of the corporation is:
           -----

                          SECURITY BIOMETRICS, INC.

     4. The number of shares of the corporation outstanding and entitled to
vote on an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is 3,125,000; that said
amendment has been consented to and approved by a majority vote of the
stockholders holding at least a majority of each class of stock outstanding
and entitled to vote thereon.


                                               /s/ Alan Wilson
DATED: July 21, 2000                           -------------------------------
                                               ALAN WILSON
                                               President

                                               /s/ Tanis Cornwall
DATED: July 21, 2000                           --------------------------------
                                               TANIS CORNWALL
                                               Secretary




                               Page 1 of 1