alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice Application Forthcoming)

Stephen Neal Zack

Hon. Ursula Ungaro (Ret.)

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
December 23, 2021
No. 04

- 21

- 00544

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF B.C.S., a Child,
From the 285th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 01057 Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez , Jud ge Presiding



### O R D E R
The reporter ’s record was originally due to be filed on December 20, 2021. To date, the court reporter responsible for preparing the record has neither filed the record n or a notification of late record

. This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s pa rental rights . Consequently, each extension of the deadline to file the reporter’s record must not exceed 10 days , see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c); cumulative extensions must not exceed 30 days, absent extraordinary circumstances , see id. R. 28.4(b)(2); and this appeal must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed , s ee T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. G iven the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal , w e ORDER the court reporter to f

ile the reporter’s record in this court no later than December 30, 2021

. R equests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a ffixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of December, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0066 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL JOSEPH MCCOY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until October 7 , 202 1 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 2 2021

09/02/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0066
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15441]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, 
DC 20549.
Request for Approval:
Online Investor Behavior Survey; OMB Control No. 3235-new.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this 
collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget for 
approval.
    Commissioner Laura S. Unger plans to conduct an online investor 
behavior survey. The survey would be voluntary in nature. It would be 
distributed to approximately 10,000 investors by brokerage firm members 
of the Securities Industry Association. Each respondent would spend 
approximately 15 minutes completing the survey for an estimated annual 
total burden of 2,500 hours. The survey would enable the Commission to 
learn more about the habits and education needs of online investors, 
and differences between online and paper-based investors. The survey 
would help the Commission determine how to improve its investor 
protection and education initiatives with respect to online investors.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of 
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarify of the information collected; and (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will 
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Michael E. Bartell, 
Associate Executive Director, Office of Information Technology, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 5th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20549.

    Dated: June 13, 2000.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15441 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.209-1 Cooperation and assistance.

Each responsible GSA official shall to the fullest extent practicable seek the cooperation of recipients in obtaining compliance with this subpart 101-6.2 and shall provide assistance and guidance to recipients to help them comply voluntarily with this subpart.
Exhibit B

Case 1:22-cv-23661-PCH Document 28-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-23661-PCH Document 28-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/03/2023 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.10-15 Approval of sound signals. ( a ) The Coast Guard approves a sound signal if: ( 1 ) It meets the requirements for sound signals in § 67.10-1 (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) when tested under § 67.10-20; or
( 2 ) It is similar to a sound signal which was tested and approved under the provisions of this section and the Coast Guard has approved all variations in design, construction, production, and manufacture from the sound signal tested.
( b ) A sound signal that is an identical production model of a sound signal which has been approved under paragraph (a) of this section is a Coast Guard approved sound signal.
Order entered March 31, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00894
- CV TEXAS HEALTH AND HUM AN SERVICES COMMISSI ON, Appellant V. JOSEPH MCRAE, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas Count y, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 04163



### O RDER Appellant’s March 30, 2015, motion to supplement its index of authorities to include Dallas County Hospital d/b/a Parkland Health and Hospital System v. Constantino , 2014 WL 3850579 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Augus t 7, 2014, no pet.) is GRANTED

.
/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES PRESIDING JUSTICE
Corporation for National and Community Service
Board of Directors

Resolution

WHEREAS, pursuant to section 192A (g)(10)(A) and (B) of the National and
Community Service Act of 1990, as last amended in 2009 (42 U.S.C. 12651b (g)(10)(A)
and (B)), the Board of Directors (the Board) has authority to enter into grants, contracts
and other agreements with Federal agencies and private nonprofit organizations, it is
hereby,

RESOLVED that the Board hereby delegates to the Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation for National and Community Service the authority to: (1) make grants to, or
contracts with Federal or other public departments or agencies, and private nonprofit
organizations, for the assignment of or referral of volunteers under the provisions of title
I of the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. § 4950 et seq.), which may
provide that the agency or organization pay all or part of the costs of the program; and (2)
enter into agreements with other Federal agencies or private nonprofit organizations for
the support of programs under the national service laws, which may provide that the
agency or organization pay all or a part of the costs of the program; and it is hereby,

FURTHER RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 193A (d) (3) of the National and
Community Service Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 12651d (d) (3)), the Chief Executive
Officer may further delegate the authority granted in this Resolution.

Passed by notational ballot, March 1, 2012

Resolution 2012-06
#### § 952.13 Continuances and extensions.

Continuances and extensions will not be granted by the presiding officer except for good cause shown.
Case 1:22-cr-20512-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022 Page 1 of 5
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20512-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:22-cr-20512-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022 Page 3 of 5
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20512-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022 Page 4 of 5
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20512-RKA Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022 Page 5 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHAUN AKINDOALEXANDER RUSHING, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-00169 (UNA) 

)

HOMELESS SHELTER, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint, ECF No. 1, and application for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. For the reasons explained below, the court will grant 

plaintiff’s IFP application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). 

Plaintiff, a resident of the District of Columbia, sues an unnamed homeless shelter near 

2nd and E Streets in Northwest Washington, D.C., and 3 unnamed shelter employees, and in doing 

so, fails to comply with by D.C. LCvR 5.1(c)(1). He alleges that several of defendant’s employees 

have treated him with disrespect. More specifically, he contends that in January, he went to the 

shelter to retrieve some of his belongings but was prohibited from entering the premises. He 

demands $145 million in damages. 

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth 

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available 

only when a “federal question” is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount 

in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts 

that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such 

facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). 
First, plaintiff’s claims fail to raise any federal question. Second, based on the information 

provided, plaintiff and defendants are all located in the District of Columbia, so there can be no 

diversity jurisdiction. See Bush v. Butler, 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Owen 

Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365, 373-74 (1978)) (“For jurisdiction to exist under 

28 U.S.C. § 1332, there must be complete diversity between the parties, which is to say that the 

plaintiff may not be a citizen of the same state as any defendant.”). Therefore, this court cannot

exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this matter. 

For all of these reasons, the complaint, ECF No. 1, and the case, is dismissed without 

prejudice. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: February 9, 2023 ___________/s/____________

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS

 United States District Judge
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 12, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 12, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0145. TRI Q. DU v. LASHARN HUGHES et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2019CV319725
Exhibit 10.20.3
                                    AMENDMENT
                                     to the
                                ALBERTSON'S, INC.
                         1990 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

          This Amendment is made by  Albertson's,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation
the "Corporation").

                                    RECITALS:

          A. The  Corporation  established the  Albertson's,  Inc. 1990 Deferred
Compensation Plan effective January 1, 1990 (the "Plan");

         B. The Corporation,  pursuant to Section 10.1 of the Plan, retained the
right to amend the Plan and Section 10.1  provides  that the Plan may be amended
by  the  Grantor  Trust  Committee  appointed  by  the  Board  of  Directors  of
Albertson's,  Inc. and the Committee has granted the authority to amend the Plan
to the Grantor  Trust  Committee so long as such  amendments  do not  materially
alter benefits; and

         C. The Committee has determined  that it is advisable to amend the Plan
in the manner hereinafter set forth and that such amendments does not materially
alter benefits.

                                    AMENDMENT

         The Plan is hereby  amended,  as of November 1, 1998,  in the following
respects:

         The last two  sentences of Section 6.4 (a) of the Plan shall be deleted
and the following language shall be substituted in their place:

         The Participant may modify the form of the  distribution of all or part
         of the Participant's  Account,  provided that such modification is made
         on a validly  executed and timely filed Deferral  Agreement  before the
         end of the  calendar  year which ends at least twelve (12) months prior
         to the date on which  any  distribution  of the  Participant's  Account
         shall have commenced.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  instrument  has been duly  executed  by the
undersigned on this 11th day of November, 1998.

                                      ALBERTSON'S, INC.



                                      By:/s/  Thomas R. Saldin
                                         Thomas R. Saldin
                                         Executive Vice President,
                                         Administration and General Counsel

<PAGE>
#### § 101-46.000 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR chapter 102, parts 102-1 through 102-220).

For information on replacement of personal property pursuant to the exchange/sale authority previously contained in this part, see FMR part 39 (41 CFR part 102-39).
Exhibit 10.2


 


CONVERTIBLE DEBT AMENDMENT


 





Trillium
Partners LP(the “Holder”) is the holder of various outstanding promissory notes (each a “Note and collectively
“Notes”) issued by Bantek, Inc. (f.k.a. Drone USA, Inc.) (the “Company”) set forth hereto on Schedule A. The
Notes represent all promissory notes and/ or other securities issued by Company to Holder which are convertible or exercisable
into shares of the Company’s common stock.


 


The Holder and the Company now desire to amend the
Notes as follows:


 


All provisions contained in the Notes which establish
the right of Holder to convert any portion of the principal and/ or interest of such Notes into shares of the Company’s common
stock shall be deleted and have no further effect. To the extent Holder has submitted a conversion notice to the Company in respect
of any Note which remains pending as of the date of this Amendment, such conversion notice shall no longer be valid, and the Company
shall have no further obligation to honor any pending conversion notice in respect of such Note. This Amendment shall be absolute
and shall not be waivable in the future by the parties.


 


Notwithstanding the above, all other terms and provisions
of the Notes shall remain in full force and effect. Nothing in this Amendment shall be construed to relieve the Company of its
absolute obligation to pay Holder the principal amount plus accrued interest set forth in the Notes according to their terms. This
Agreement shall be construed as to validity and performance, and shall be enforced in accordance with and governed by the laws
of the jurisdiction as set forth in the Notes.




 


Dated:
November 1, 2019


 


	Trillium Partners LP	 	Bantek,
    Inc. (f.k.a. Drone USA, Inc.)
	 	 	 
	By:		 	By:	
	Title:	Mgr of GP	 	Title: 	CEO


 



     


     


    

 


SCHEDULE A




 


PROMISSORY NOTES


 


	Issuance Date	 	Principal Amount	 	 	Interest Rate	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	6/20/19	 	$	6,000	 	 	 	12	%
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	7/12/19	 	$	10,000	 	 	 	10	%
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15408]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207.

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, June 22, 2000, 2 p.m.

LOCATION: Room 410, East West Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:   

Compliance Status Report

    The staff will brief the Commission on the status of various 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: June 14, 2000.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15408 Filed 6-14-00; 2:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
#### § 101-39.303 Maintenance.

In order to ensure uninterrupted operation of GSA Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS) vehicles, safety and preventive maintenance inspections will be performed at regularly scheduled intervals as directed by GSA. Users of GSA IFMS vehicles shall comply with the safety and preventive maintenance notices and instructions issued for the vehicle.

[56 FR 59890, Nov. 26, 1991]
§ 102-34.315 How do we obtain fuel for Government motor vehicles? You may obtain fuel for Government motor vehicles by using: ( a ) A Government-issued charge card;
( b ) A Government agency fueling facility; or
( c ) Personal funds and obtaining reimbursement from your agency, if permitted by your agency. You must use the method prescribed by GSA Fleet to obtain fuel for vehicles leased from GSA fleet.
#### § 102-117.115 How do I calculate total delivery costs?

You calculate total delivery costs for a shipment by considering all costs related to the shipping or receiving process, such as packing, blocking, bracing, drayage, loading and unloading, and transporting. Surcharges such as fuel, currency exchange, war risk insurance, and other surcharges should also be factored into the costs.

[75 FR 51394, Aug. 20, 2010]
§ 501.17 Decertified Postage Evidencing Systems. ( a ) A Decertified Postage Evidencing System is a device for which the provider's authority to distribute has been withdrawn by the Postal Service as a result of any retirement plan for a given class of meters published by the Postal Service in the Federal Register; a suspension or revocation under § 501.6; or a voluntary withdrawal undertaken by the provider.
( b ) A Decertified Postage Evidencing System must be withdrawn from service by the date agreed to by the Postal Service and provider.
( c ) To the extent postage meters are involved, the provider must utilize the approved procedures for lost and stolen meters under § 501.14(c)(7) to locate the meter and remove it from service by the agreed upon date.
( d ) Decertified Postage Evidencing Systems that are not submitted to the Postal Service for refund within one hundred and eighty (180) days of the agreed upon withdrawal from service date will not be eligible for refund of unused postage.
( e ) Postage indicia printed by Decertified Postage Evidencing Systems may no longer be considered valid postage one hundred and eighty (180) days from the agreed upon withdrawal from service date.
( f ) Postage Evidencing Systems that do not comply with the then current Intelligent Mail Indicia Performance Criteria will be Decertified Postage Evidencing Systems on June 30, 2024. The withdrawal date for those systems will be December 31, 2024.
[71 FR 65733, Nov. 9, 2006, as amended at 85 FR 78235, Dec. 4, 2020]