37802 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 117 / Friday, June 16, 2000 / Notices

IL000020 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000021 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000023 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000025 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000026 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000028 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000035 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000043 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000048 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000058 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000062 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000064 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000065 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000068 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IL000069 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Volume V

Michigan

MI000001 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000002 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000003 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000004 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000005 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000007 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000008 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000009 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000015 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000017 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000019 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000030 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000031 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000034 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000040 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000046 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000047 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000049 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000059 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000060 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000062 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000063 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000064 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000066 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000067 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000068 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000069 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000070 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000071 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000072 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000073 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000074 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000075 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000076 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000077 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000078 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000079 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000080 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000081 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000082 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000083 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000084 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000085 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000086 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000087 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000088 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000091 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000092 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000096 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MI000097 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Minnesota

MN000005 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MN000007 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MN000008 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MN000015 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MN000027 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MN000052 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MN000058 (Feb. 11, 2000)

MN000061 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Ohio

OH000001 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000002 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000003 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000008 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000012 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000013 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000024 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000026 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000027 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000029 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000032 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OH000036 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Volume V

Iowa

IA000002 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000003 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000004 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000005 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000006 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000007 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000009 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000016 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000019 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000029 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000032 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000038 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000067 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000070 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000072 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000078 (Feb. 11, 2000)

IA000079 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Kansas

KS000013 (Feb. 11, 2000)

KS000022 (Feb. 11, 2000)

KS000069 (Feb. 11, 2000)

KS000070 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Volume VI

Idaho

ID000001 (Feb. 11, 2000)

North Dakota

ND000031 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Oregon

OR000001 (Feb. 11, 2000)

OR000017 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Washington

WA000003 (Feb. 11, 2000)

WA000007 (Feb. 11, 2000)

WA000011 (Feb. 11, 2000)

Volume VII

California

CA000001 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000002 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000004 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000009 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000029 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000030 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000031 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000032 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000033 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000034 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000035 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000036 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000037 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000038 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000039 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000040 (Feb. 11, 2000)

CA000041 (Feb. 11, 2000)

General Wage Determination Publication

General wage determinations issued

under the Davis-Bacon and related Acts,

including those noted above, may be

found in the Government Printing Office

(GPO) document entitled ‘‘General Wage

Determinations Issued Under the DavisBacon and Related Acts.’’ This

publication is available at each of the 50

regional Government Depository

Libraries and many of the 1,400

Government Depository Libraries across

the country.

The general wage determinations

issued under the Davis-Bacon and

related acts are available electronically

by subscription to the FedWorld

Bulletin Board System of the National

Technical Information Service (NTIS) of

the U.S. Department of Commerce at 1–

800–363–2068.

Hard-copy subscriptions may be

purchased from: Superintendent of

Documents, U.S. Government Printing

Office, Washington, DC 20402, (202)

512–1800.

When ordering hard-copy

subscription(s), be sure to specify the

State(s) of interest, since subscriptions

may be ordered for any or all of the

seven separate volumes, arranged by

State. Subscriptions include an annual

edition (issued in January or February)

which includes all current general wage

determinations for the States covered by

each volume. Throughout the remainder

of the year, regular weekly updates are

distributed to subscribers.

Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of

June 2000.

Carl J. Poleskey,

Chief, Branch of Construction Wage

Determinations.

[FR Doc. 00–14970 Filed 6–15–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–27–M

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND

SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 00–068]

National Environmental Policy Act;

Ames Development Plan for NASA

Ames Research Center

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and

Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an

environmental impact statement (EIS)

and conduct scoping for an Ames

Development Plan (ADP) for NASA

Ames Research Center (hereinafter

referred to as the ‘‘Center’’).

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969

(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et

seq.), the Council on Environmental

Quality Regulations for Implementing

the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40

CFR parts 1500–1508), and NASA

Policy and Procedures (14 CFR part

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 117 / Friday, June 16, 2000 / Notices 37803

1216 subpart 1216.3), NASA intends to

conduct scoping and prepare an EIS for

the proposed ADP. The ADP will

include integrated development plans

for the following areas within the

Center: (1) A portion of the Center

comprised of approximately 86 hectares

(213 acres) situated between the original

Center campus, the airfield, U.S.

Highway 101, and U.S. Air Force

controlled military housing area

(hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘NASA

Research Park’’); (2) a portion of the

Center comprised of 385 hectares (952

acres) including the airfield and lands to

the east of the airfield (hereinafter

referred to as ‘‘East Side-Airfield’’); (3)

a portion of the Center comprising 38

hectares (94.6 acres) located north of the

original Center campus (hereinafter

referred to as ‘‘Bay View’’); and (4) that

portion of the Center comprising the

original 97 hectares (240 acres) Center

campus (hereinafter referred to as the

‘‘ARC Facilities’’). The Center is located

in Santa Clara County, California. The

EIS will address the environmental

issues associated with the ADP and its

implementation.

The ADP will focus, in part, on the

NASA Research Park, proposed as a

world-class, shared-use educational and

research and development (R&D)

campus focused on astrobiology, life

sciences, space sciences,

nanotechnology, information

technology, and aeronautics. The goal of

the NASA Research Park is to create

partnerships with Federal, state, and

local government agencies, universities,

private industry and non-profit

organizations in support of NASA’s

mission to conduct research on and

develop new technologies. The ADP

will also focus on proposed new

development in Bay View and East

Side-Airfield, and potential replacement

of existing NASA research facilities in

the ARC Facilities.

DATES: Interested parties are invited to

submit written comments or

environmental concerns to NASA on or

before July 31, 2000 to ensure full

consideration during the scoping

process. Public scoping meetings will be

held in the vicinity of the Center during

the middle part of July 2000. The

specific meeting times and locations

will be published in the San Jose

Mercury News and the La Oferta Review.

The meeting schedule can also be

obtained from Michael Mewhinney at

the phone number listed below.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be

submitted to Ms. Sandy Olliges, NASA

Ames Research Center, Environmental

Services Office, Mail Stop 218–1,

Moffett Field, CA 94035–1000. While

hard copy comments are preferred,

comments by electronic mail may be

sent to researchpark@arc.nasa.gov

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Mewhinney, Development and

Communication Office, 650–604–3937.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1991,

the Federal Base Closure and

Realignment Commission decided to

close Moffett Field Naval Air Station.

Subsequently, the U.S. Department of

Defense transferred stewardship of the

property to NASA. NASA took over

administration of 752 hectares (1,857

acres) of Moffett Field in 1994. The

immediate issues were how to use the

newly acquired land in a manner

consistent with NASA’s mission, and

how to pay for the maintenance and

operations of such a large site. These

matters were originally addressed in the

Moffett Field Comprehensive Use Plan

(CUP) and its associated Environmental

Assessment (EA), which resulted in a

Finding of No Significant Impact

(FONSI) in 1994. After the transfer of

the property, local community leaders

formed a Community Action Committee

(CAC) and recommended uses for the

newly acquired land. The uses proposed

in the ADP are consistent with the CAC

recommendations.

In addition to the activities described

in the CUP, NASA now proposes to

develop the NASA Research Park and

other areas, which will build on the full

range of existing high-technology and

aviation resources at Moffett Field and

create partnerships with Federal, State,

and local governmental agencies,

universities, private industry and nonprofit organizations in support of

NASA’s mission to develop new

technologies. With the help of these

collaborative organizations, NASA

proposes to develop on currently

underutilized land at Moffett Field a

world-class, shared-use educational and

R&D campus focused on astrobiology,

life sciences, space sciences,

nanotechnology, information

technology, and aeronautics. This new

campus would further NASA’s mission

by providing the critical mass of

scholars and engineers necessary to

create a vital research and educational

community focused on the advancement

of human knowledge about life sciences,

space sciences, nanotechnology,

information technology, the Earth and

space. By integrating public and private

R&D efforts, the NASA Research Park

would serve as a hub of technology

transfer, keeping NASA researchers

involved in cutting-edge technology

advances, and promoting the

commercial applications of NASA’s

basic scientific research.

Alternatives for the development at

the Center to be studied in the EIS

include, but are not necessarily limited

to the following:

(1) Alternative 1: No action; continued

current use of buildings and land.

(2) Alternative 2: Increase buildings

and existing structures to 326,000

square meters from 140,000 square

meters (3.5 million square feet from 1.5

million square feet) of floor space

within the NASA Research Park.

Proposed uses within the NASA

Research Park would include: Student/

faculty housing, training and residential

conference facilities, offices, R&D,

laboratory, museum and educational

facilities. Also included in this

alternative is the renovation of 46,500

square meters (500,000 square feet),

including Hangar 1 for the California

Air and Space Center. For Bay View,

this alternative also includes 121,000

square meters (1.3 million square feet)

of offices, R&D, laboratory, educational

facilities and student/faculty housing.

For East Side-Airfield, this alternative

includes approximately 51,000 square

meters (550,000 square feet) of new light

industrial, R&D, office and educational

facilities. For ARC Facilities, this

alternative includes the renovation and

replacement of approximately 46,500

square meters (500,000 square feet) for

offices, R&D and laboratories. No new

wind tunnels or increased aircraft

operations are proposed. The existing

Burrowing Owl habitat would be

protected.

(3) Alternative 3: Increase buildings

and existing structures to 418,000

square meters from 140,000 square

meters (4.5 million square feet from 1.5

million square feet) of floor space

within the NASA Research Park.

Proposed uses within the NASA

Research Park would include: Student/

faculty housing, training and residential

conference facilities, offices, R&D,

laboratory, museum and educational

facilities. Also included in this

alternative is the renovation of 46,500

square meters (500,000 square feet),

including Hangar 1 for the California

Air and Space Center. For Bay View,

this alternative includes no proposed

development. For East Side-Airfield,

this alternative includes the adaptive

reuse of existing historic hangars. For

ARC Facilities, this alternative includes

the renovation and/or replacement of

existing buildings and structures. No

new wind tunnels or increased aircraft

operations are proposed. The existing

Burrowing Owl habitat would be

protected.

(4) Alternative 4: Increase buildings

and existing structures to 279,000

square meters from 140,000 square

37804 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 117 / Friday, June 16, 2000 / Notices

meters (3.0 million square feet from 1.5

million square feet) of floor space

within the NASA Research Park.

Proposed uses within the NASA

Research Park would include: Student/

faculty housing, training and residential

conference facilities, offices, R&D,

laboratory, museum and educational

facilities. Also included in this

alternative is the renovation of 46,500

square meters (500,000 square feet),

including Hangar 1 for the California

Air and Space Center. For Bay View,

this alternative also includes 251,000

square meters (2.7 million square feet)

of offices, R&D, laboratory, educational

facilities and student/faculty housing,

and elimination of the Outdoor

Aerodynamic Research Facility in the

northern portion of Bay View). For East

Side-Airfield, this alternative would

include approximately 62,000 square

meters (670,000 square feet) of new light

industrial, R&D, office and educational

facilities. For ARC Facilities, this

alternative would include the

renovation and replacement of

approximately 140,000 square meters

(1.5 million square feet) for offices, R&D

and laboratories. No new wind tunnels

or increased aircraft operations are

proposed. The existing Burrowing Owl

habitat would be protected.

NASA is currently proceeding with a

project that includes the development of

a laboratory facility that was covered by

a FONSI issued in 1994 for the CUP.

Development under the CUP also

includes renovation of portions of the

Shenandoah National Historic District

and other minor development.

The California Air National Guard

(CANG) is proceeding with its master

plan, which includes construction of a

new airfield support facility. The

CANG’s development is covered by a

separate FONSI and EA, which they

issued in 1997.

No new wind tunnels or additional

aircraft operations are proposed for any

of the action alternatives. No

development would occur in wetlands.

The Bay Trail would be accommodated

as part of the action alternatives.

The Center area is served by several

modes of public transportation,

including the Santa Clara Valley Transit

Authority Light Rail, CalTrain, and

bicycle paths.

The EIS will consider the full range of

potential environmental impacts

associated with these alternatives.

Environmental issues addressed will

include, but not necessarily be limited

to, public policy, land use, motor

vehicle traffic, air quality, infrastructure

and drainage, hazardous materials and

site contamination, pollution

prevention, geology, biological

resources, noise, aesthetics, cultural

resources, socioeconomic impacts

(including environmental justice), and

other issues identified for emphasis

during the scoping process. NASA

believes that the greatest potential for

environmental impact is to traffic and

air quality. If the proposed development

would increase relevant air emissions

above 100 tons per year, NASA would

conduct a detailed general conformity

determination, pursuant to the Clean

Air Act.

NASA will consult with the State

Historic Preservation Office during the

planning process because part of the

NASA Research Park and East SideAirfield development would be located

in a historic district that is listed on the

National Register of Historic Places.

Written public input and comments

on environmental issues or concerns

related to the development of the Center

are hereby solicited.

Jeffrey E. Sutton,

Associate Administrator for Management

Systems.

[FR Doc. 00–15257 Filed 6–15–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510–01–P

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical

and Transport Systems; Notice of

Meeting

In accordance with the Federal Advisory

Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as amended),

the National Science Foundation announces

the following meeting:

Name: Special Emphasis Panel in

Chemical and Transport Systems (1190).

Date and Time: July 20, 2000; 8 a.m. to 5

p.m.

Place: Room 320; National Science

Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington,

VA 22230.

Type of Meeting: Closed.

Contact Person: Dr. Geoffrey Prentice,

Program Director, Kinetics, Catalysis &

Molecular Processes, Division of Chemical

and Transport Systems, Room 525, National

Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd.,

Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306–

1371.

Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and

recommendations concerning proposals

submitted to NSF for financial support.

Agenda: To review and evaluate XYZ on a

Chip Grants as part of the selection process

for awards.

Reason for Closing: The proposal being

reviewed includes information of a

proprietary or confidential nature, including

technical information; financial data; such as

salaries, and personal information

concerning individuals associated with the

proposals. These matters are exempt under 5

U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government

in the Sunshine Act.

Note: Closed portions are proper under

Sunshine Act exemptions cited. The CMO’s

signature on this Notice is the required

determination.

Dated: June 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–15229 Filed 6–15–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555–01–M

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Chemistry;

Notice of Meeting

In accordance with the Federal

Advisory Committee Act (Public Law

92–463, as amended), the National

Science Foundation announces the

following meeting:

Name/Code: Special Emphasis Panel in

Chemistry (#1191).

Date/Time: July 24–25, 2000; 8:30 A.M.–

5:00 P.M.

Place: Rooms 1020 and 1060, NSF, 4201

Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.

Type of Meeting: Closed.

Contact Person: Dr. Joseph Akkara,

Coordinator, Environmental Molecular

Science Institute (EMSI) and Collaborative

Research Activities in Environmental

Molecular Science (CRAEMS), Chemistry

Division, Room 1055, National Science

Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,

Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306–

1857.

Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and

recommendations concerning proposals

submitted to NSF for financial support.

Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals

for the EMSI and CRAEMS as part of the

selection process for awards.

Reason for Closing: The proposals being

reviewed include information of a

proprietary or confidential nature, including

technical information, financial data such as

salaries, and personal information

concerning individuals associated with the

proposals. These matters are exempt under 5

U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government

in the Sunshine Act.

Note: Closed portions are proper under

Sunshine Act exemptions cited. The CMO’s

signature on this Notice is the required

determination.

Dated: June 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00–15225 Filed 6–15–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555–01–M

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Civil and

Mechanical Systems; Notice of

Meeting

In accordance with the Federal

Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–

463, as amended), the National Science