alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 102-3.125 What is required to be included in an agency's administrative guidelines to implement an advisory committee? An agency's administrative guidelines provide the details that advisory committee staff need to implement FACA requirements during the creation, operation, and termination of their advisory committees. ( a ) *Advisory committee bylaws.* Advisory committee bylaws should be developed by the agency, with advisory committee input and buy-in. Agency guidelines should specify the content of bylaws and ensure that they provide clear operating procedures for advisory committee meetings, other committee activities, and the relationship between committee members, the DFO, and agency staff.
( b ) *Advisory committee costs.* Agency guidelines must: ( 1 ) Provide instructions on how to identify, calculate, and fully document advisory committee costs; and
( 2 ) Ensure agency committee cost records match the data reported to Congress and the public through the FACA database.
H. R. 5417

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To rename the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act as the ‘‘McKinneyVento Homeless Assistance Act’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

Section 1 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance

Act (42 U.S.C. 11301 note; Public Law 100–77) is amended by

striking subsection (a) and inserting the following new subsection:

‘‘(a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘McKinneyVento Homeless Assistance Act’.’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in any law, regulation, document, paper, or other

record of the United States to the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless

Assistance Act shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘McKinneyVento Homeless Assistance Act’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### § 102-118.415 Can the Administrator of General Services exempt the transportation postpayment audit requirement?

Yes. The Administrator of General Services or designee may exempt, for a specified time, an agency or subagency from the GSA transportation postpayment audit oversight requirements of this subpart. The Administrator can also exempt a particular mode or modes of transportation (31 U.S.C. 3726).

[81 FR 65303, Sept. 22, 2016, as amended at 87 FR 32325, May 31, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5295 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5295

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to discharge of 
indebtedness income from prepayment of loans under section 306B of the 
                   Rural Electrification Act of 1936.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2000

 Mr. English introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to discharge of 
indebtedness income from prepayment of loans under section 306B of the 
                   Rural Electrification Act of 1936.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISCHARGE OF INDEBTEDNESS INCOME FROM PREPAYMENT OF RUS 
              LOANS.

    Subparagraph (C) of section 501(c)(12) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (i),
            (2) by striking ``, 306B,'' in clause (ii),
            (3) by striking the period at the end of clause (ii) and 
        inserting ``, or'', and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iii) from the prepayment of a loan under 
                        section 306B of the Rural Electrification Act 
                        of 1936 (as in effect on the date of the 
                        enactment of this clause).''
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case Number: 22-23683-CIV-MARTINEZ-BECERRA

CREELED, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES,

AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A,”

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Jacqueline Becerra, United States 

Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of 

Final Default Judgment Against Defendants (“Motion”), (ECF No. 39). Judge Becerra filed an 

R&R recommending that the Motion be granted. (ECF No. 41). The Court has reviewed the entire 

file and record, and notes that no objections have been filed. 

Accordingly, after careful consideration, it is hereby ADJUDGED that Judge Becerra’s 

R&R, (ECF No. 41), is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Further, it is ADJUDGED and 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion, (ECF No. 39), is GRANTED. Final Judgment shall issue by 

separate order.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 18th day of September, 2023.

____________________________________

Copies provided to: JOSE E. MARTINEZ

Magistrate Judge Becerra UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23683-JEM Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/19/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-2.115 What kinds of non-regulatory material does GSA publish outside of the FMR?

As GSA converts the FPMR to the FMR, non-regulatory materials in the FPMR, such as guidance, procedures, standards, and information, that describe how to do business with GSA, will become available in separate documents. These documents may include customer service guides, handbooks, brochures, Internet websites, and FMR bulletins. GSA will eliminate non-regulatory material that is no longer needed.
1

BRITO, PLLC

2121 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Suite 650│ Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 614-4071

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Fort Lauderdale Division

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.

Defendant.

Case No.: 22-cv-61842-AHS

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF

Please take notice that Alejandro Brito, Esq. of the law firm of Brito, PLLC hereby enters

his appearance as co-counsel for Plaintiff Donald J. Trump.

Dated June 28, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

BRITO, PLLC

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 

2121 Ponce de Leon Boulevard

Suite 650

Miami, FL 33134

Office: 305-614-4071

Fax: 305-440-4385

By: /s/ Alejandro Brito

ALEJANDRO BRITO

Florida Bar No. 098442 

abrito@britopllc.com

apiriou@britopllc.com

Case 0:22-cv-61842-AHS Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

BRITO, PLLC

2121 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Suite 650│ Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 614-4071

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 28, 2023 the foregoing was served via the Court’s

CM/ECF System upon:

LINDSEY HALLIGAN, P.A.

Lindsey Halligan, Esq.

511 SE 5th Avenue

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 

lindseyhalligan@outlook.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

GUNSTER, YOAKLEY & STEWART, P.A. 

George S. LeMieux, Esq. 

Eric C. Edison, Esq. 

450 East Las Olas Boulevard

Suite 1400 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

glemieux@gunster.com 

eedison@gunster.com

mzayas@gunster.com

dpeterson@gunster.com

eservice@gunster.com

Counsel for Defendant

By: /s/ Alejandro Brito

Case 0:22-cv-61842-AHS Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2023 Page 2 of 2
REFERENCE 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC 

HUMMINGBIRD® 

INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS IN UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS 

Precision Agriculture 

The Hummingbird'" is a key component in the Decision Support System (DSS) for whole farm 

management. The ability to simultaneously carry a variety of multi- and hyper-spectral sensors enables 

farm managers to evaluate in real-time the hydrology of their fields, the biophysical parameters of crops 

and the determination of what types and quantities of fertilization and pesticides to apply. 

Pipeline & Power Line Inspection 

With a long flight duration and heavy lift capability, the Hummingbird is ideally suited for applications 

such as pipeline and power line inspections where autonomous flight over long distances, auto-landing 

& take-off (for soil sampling) and stop and hover are required functions. With VTOL capability, the Hummingbird is the only UAS that can stop, descend, sample and takeoff on a fully autonomous 

operation with a long duration mission capability. 

Airborne Delivery 

A key element in payload capability is the ability to either pre-program the release of a payload or 

manually cause its release either from altitude or upon landing. The Hummingbird has six hard points, 

which can be individually programmed or controlled by the ground station to retain or deploy mission 

specific payloads in excess of 20 pounds. 
REFERENCE 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC 

4+ HOUR FLIGHT TIME 

OVER 20 POUND PAY LOAD 

Airframe: 

Maximum takeoff weight 

Wing span (Diameter) 

Payload capacity 

Hard points 

Main propulsion system (counter rotating ducted fan rotors) 

Main ducted fan diameter 

Secondary propulsion system (external ducted fans) 

Fuel type 

Fuel capacity (standard tanks) 

Performance: 

Service ceiling (feet) 

Cruise speed (mph) 

Max speed 

Max crosswind 

Max crosswind gust 

Flight time duration 

VTOL launch 

VTOL recovery 

Avionics: 

Auto pilot (triple redundant) 

Autonomous flight 

Way points 

Auto failsafe (return to takeoff or designated recovery point) 

Point & click navigation 

GPS/compass 

3 axis magnetometer 

Dual Laser altitude sensor for precision auto-landing 

Navigation lights (conventional I IR) 

Battery backup (avionics & flight control) 

Auxiliary power for payloads 

Transponder (mode C, Mode S with ADS-B) 

Optional Payload capabilities: 

Spedficatio rns 

1211bs. 

90inches 

20+ lbs. 

6 

2 fans 

24 inches 

6 ducted fans@ 17" 

Gas or Multi-Fuel Option 

6 gallons 

14,000 feet (est.) 

55 

60 

35 

45 

4+ hours 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

TBA
AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                           NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                                                    THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED
                                                ------------------------------
                                                August 29,          August 30,
                                                   1998               1997 
                                                ---------           -------
Net income for computing earnings
  per common share                              ($32,651)           $27,349
                                                =========           =======



Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding during each period          890,597            921,507
                                                ========            =======



Net income per common share                      ($0.037)            $0.030
                                                =========            ======
#### § 953.14 Final Agency decision.

The Judicial Officer shall render a final Agency decision. The decision shall be served upon the parties and the postal official having custody of any mail detained pursuant to the determination or ruling.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15229]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems 
(1190).
    Date and Time: July 20, 2000; 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Room 320; National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Geoffrey Prentice, Program Director, 
Kinetics, Catalysis & Molecular Processes, Division of Chemical and 
Transport Systems, Room 525, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1371.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate XYZ on a Chip Grants as part of 
the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposal being reviewed includes 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data; such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Note: Closed portions are proper under Sunshine Act exemptions 
cited. The CMO's signature on this Notice is the required 
determination.


    Dated: June 12, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15229 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHNATHON L. LUESING, )

DOC# H25184, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-632

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 9, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.

Johnathon L. Luesing, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5273

AN ACT

To clarify the intention of the Congress with regard

to the authority of the United States Mint toproduce numismatic coins, and for other purposes.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5273

AN ACT

To clarify the intention of the Congress with regard to the

authority of the United States Mint to produce numismatic coins, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5273 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Mint

3 Numismatic Coin Clarification Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MINT’S AUTHORITY.

5 (a) SILVER PROOF COINS.—Section 5132(a)(2)(B)(i)

6 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking

7 ‘‘paragraphs (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2)’’.

8 (b) PLATINUM COINS.—Section 5112(k) of title 31,

9 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘bullion’’ and

10 inserting ‘‘platinum bullion coins’’.

11 SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL REPORT REQUIREMENT.

12 Section 5134(e)(2) of title 31, United States Code,

13 is amended—

14 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A),

15 by striking ‘‘reflect’’ and inserting ‘‘contain’’;

16 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara17 graph (C);

18 (3) by striking the period at the end of sub19 paragraph (D) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

20 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub21 paragraph:

22 ‘‘(E) a supplemental schedule detailing—

23 ‘‘(i) the costs and expenses for the

24 production, for the marketing, and for the

25 distribution of each denomination of circu26 lating coins produced by the Mint during
3

•HR 5273 EH

1 the fiscal year and the per-unit cost of pro2 ducing, of marketing, and of distributing

3 each denomination of such coins; and

4 ‘‘(ii) the gross revenue derived from

5 the sales of each such denomination of

6 coins.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed September 21, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01157-CR 

CRISTIAN CARLOS TIRADO, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F16-71061-U 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Myers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

A jury convicted Cristian Carlos Tirado for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and 

the trial court assessed punishment at two years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney 

filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief 

meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a 

professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to 

advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining 

whether brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. 

We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. 

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to 

file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). 
 –2– 

 We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the 

appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support 

the appeal. 

 Although not an arguable issue, we note the trial court’s judgment incorrectly recites the 

punishment was assessed by the jury. The record, however, shows appellant elected to have the 

trial court assess the punishment. Accordingly, on our own motion, we modify the section of the 

judgment entitled “punishment assessed by” to show “Court.” TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. 

State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) (courts of appeals have authority to modify 

a judgment); Estrada v. State, 334 S.W.3d 57, 63–64 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.). 

 As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

171157F.U05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CRISTIAN CARLOS TIRADO, Appellant 

No. 05-17-01157-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F16-71061-U. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Myers and Stoddart participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is MODIFIED

as follows: 

 The section entitled “Punishment Assessed by” is modified to show “Court.” 

 As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment 

Judgment entered September 21, 2018.
Exhibit 24(g)3

Southern Power Inc.
Bin 905
270 Peachtree Street NW
Atlanta, Georgia  30303

                                                         [Southern Company Logo]

April 25, 2005

Mr. Wayne Boston
241 Ralph McGill Blvd
Atlanta, GA  30308

Dear Mr. Boston:

         As an officer of Southern Power Company, I hereby make, constitute, and
appoint you my true and lawful Attorney in my name, place, and stead, to sign
and cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (1) this
Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q during 2005, and (2) any necessary or
appropriate amendment or amendments to any such reports and to this Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, each such
report or amendments to such reports to be accompanied in each case by any
necessary or appropriate exhibits or schedules thereto.

                                               Yours very truly,

                                            /s/Michael W. Southern
                                              Michael W. Southern
§ 3011.102 Treatment of non-public materials. ( a ) Except as described in part 3011 or part 3006 of this chapter, the Commission will neither disclose nor grant access to any non-public materials (and the non-public information contained therein).
( b ) To accord appropriate confidentiality to non-public information and non-public materials during any stage of a proceeding before the Commission, or in connection with any other purpose under title 39 of the U.S. Code, the Commission may, based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c): ( 1 ) Prohibit the public disclosure of the non-public information and non-public materials;
( 2 ) Specify terms for public disclosure of the non-public information and non-public materials;
( 3 ) Order a specific method for disclosing the non-public information and non-public materials;
( 4 ) Restrict the scope of the disclosure of the non-public information and non-public materials as they relate to certain matters;
( 5 ) Restrict who may access the non-public information and non-public materials;
( 6 ) Require that a trade secret be revealed only in a specific and limited manner or to limited or specified persons; and
( 7 ) Order other relief as appropriate including sealing a deposition or part of a proceeding.
[83 FR 31281, July 3, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 9641, Feb. 19, 2020]
#### § 102-118.30 Are Government-controlled corporations bound by this part?

This part does not apply to Government-controlled corporations and mixed-ownership Government corporations as defined in 31 U.S.C. 9101(1) and (2).

[81 FR 65299, Sept. 22, 2016]
§ 952.23 Proposed findings and conclusions. ( a ) Each party to a proceeding, except one who fails to answer the complaint or, having answered, either fails to appear at the hearing or indicates in the answer that he or she does not desire to appear, may, unless at the discretion of the presiding officer such is not appropriate, submit proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, orders and supporting reasons either in oral or written form in the discretion of the presiding officer. The presiding officer may also require parties to any proceeding to submit proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, orders, and supporting reasons. Unless given orally, the date set for filing of proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, orders and supporting reasons shall be within 30 days after the delivery of the official transcript to the Recorder who shall notify both parties of the date of its receipt. The filing date for proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, orders and supporting reasons shall be the same for both parties. If not submitted by such date, or unless extension of time for the filing thereof is granted, they will not be included in the record or given consideration.
( b ) Except when presented orally before the close of the hearing, proposed findings of fact shall be set forth in serially numbered paragraphs and shall state with particularity all evidentiary facts in the record with appropriate citations to the transcript or exhibits supporting the proposed findings. Each proposed conclusion shall be separately stated.
( c ) Except when presented orally before the close of the hearing, proposed orders shall state the statutory basis of the order and, with respect to orders proposed to be issued pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3005(a)(3), shall be set forth in serially numbered paragraphs stating with particularity the representations Respondent and its representative shall cease and desist from using for the purpose of obtaining money or property through the mail.