alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors' Report on Schedule and Consent

The
Board of Directors
United Surgical Partners International, Inc.:

The
audits referred to in our report dated February 19, 2003, included the related consolidated financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2002 and for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002 included as an exhibit to the Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

Our
report refers to a change in the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets with the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" in 2002.

We
consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" in the Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (No. 333-64926) on Form S-8 of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. of our report with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2002 and the related financial statement schedule.

/s/
KPMG

Dallas,
Texas
March 24, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 17, 2017 

# Order

Clerk March 17, 2017

15 4 0 30 ( 7 8 )

RALPH SKIDMORE, JR., Individually and as

Personal Representative of the Estate of

CATHERINE DAWN SKIDMORE

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, SC: 15 4 03 0

v COA: 3 23757

Calhoun C C: 1 2

- 0 01595

- NH

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY

, Defendant

- Appellant

. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel

to file an amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on March 7

, 2017, is accepted for filing.
----

| 6-1162-TRW-0666 | [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED | SA-2 |
|-----------------|-------------------------------|------|

| 6-1162-TRW-0667 | [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|

|   | SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] |
|--------|-------------------------|

| 6-1162-TRW-0668 | [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|

|   | SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] |
|--------|-------------------------|
### Description and development of the Cordilleran orogenic belt in the Southwestern United States and northern Mexico

By: Harald Drewes

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1512

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 102-34.100 Where is motor vehicle identification displayed? Motor vehicle identification is displayed as follows: ( a ) *For most Government motor vehicles,* preferably on the official U.S. Government license plate. Some Government motor vehicles may display motor vehicle identification on a decal in the rear window, or centered on both front doors if the vehicle is without a rear window, or where identification on the rear window would not be easily seen.
( b ) *For trailers,* on both sides of the front quarter of the trailer in a conspicuous location.
Note to § 102-34.100 :
Each agency or activity that uses decals to identify Government motor vehicles is responsible for acquiring its own decals and for replacing them when necessary due to damage or wear.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         310,973
<SECURITIES>                                24,753,279
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,993,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,467,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,940,128
<PP&E>                                      19,396,765
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,262,992)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,680,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,729,941
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,537,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,590,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,680,390
<SALES>                                     17,985,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,985,992
<CGS>                                       12,180,629
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,180,629
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,959,609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,977,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                   685,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,292,101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,292,101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 25, 2016

d0414

Order 

Clerk

April 25, 2016

151186 & (47)

TERI WALTERS and KIM WALTERS,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 151186

COA: 319016

Eaton CC: 12-000658-NH

DONALD S. FALIK, D.D.S., d/b/a FALIK

FAMILY DENTISTRY, ROBERT C. FALIK,

D.D.S., and JANE DOE,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to strike is considered, and it is DENIED. The 

application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court 

of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Elher v Misra, ___ Mich ___ (SC 150824, 

decided 2/08/2016).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6824

CHARLTON A. HORTON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

RALPH TERRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00103-GMG)

Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 25, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlton A. Horton, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charlton A. Horton, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Horton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Horton has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. As the district court granted Horton’s motion for leave to file out 

of time, we deny as moot the motion for leave to file out of time that is currently pending 

in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### § 102-33.95 What is the process for budgeting to acquire Commercial Aviation Services (CAS)?

Except for leases and capital leases, for which you must have specific Congressional authorization as required by 31 U.S.C. 1343, you may budget to fund your CAS out of your agency's operating budget. Also see §§ 102-33.70 and 102-33.75.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 1934 Lower Tribunal No. 2022

- CC

- 007845

- O

_____________________________
F LORIDA W ELLNESS & R EHABILITATION C ENTER OF H OMESTEAD a / a / o H ELY F ERRIGNY , Appellant
,

v.

P ROGRESSIVE A MERICAN I NSURANCE C OMPANY , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the C ounty Court for Orange County

. Andrew A. Bain , Judge.

July 16, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

STARGEL
, WHITE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.

Chad A. Barr and Dalton Gray, of Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.

Kenneth P. Hazouri, of deBeaubien, Simmons, Knight, Mantzaris
, & Neal, LLP, of Orlando, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEAR ING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.213 Decisions and notices.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1995
                             
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         49,016
<SECURITIES>                                  502,847
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    90,978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              802,584
<PP&E>                                      1,481,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                477,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,893,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         627,616
<BONDS>                                       995,453
<COMMON>                                      108,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,596,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,893,781
<SALES>                                       148,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              391,264
<CGS>                                         127,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,525,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,133,892)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        



</TABLE>
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice)

Stephen Neal Zack

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 of the
Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert W. HumphreysRobert W. HumphreysPresident & Chief Executive Officer
#### § 80.1370 Willapa Bay, WA.

A line drawn from Willapa Bay Light 169.8° true to the westernmost tripod charted 1.6 miles south of Leadbetter Point.

[CGD 89-068, 55 FR 31831, Aug. 6, 1990]
#### § 102-3.85 [Reserved]
1 John T. Boyd, Chi ef Justice (Ret.), Sev enth Court ofAppeals, sitti ng by assignment. Tex . Gov ’t CodeAnn. §7 5.002 (a)(1 ) (Vern on Sup p. 200 3). NO. 07-03-0254 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L E JUNE 11, 2003

______________________________ EDW ARD SANCHEZ HINAJAS AKA EDW ARD SANCHEZ HINOJOSA AKA EDW ARD SANCHEZ HINOJO S, Appellant v. THE STATEOF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE320 TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUN TY; NO. 46,044-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRES IDING

_______________________________

DISMI SSAL

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J. 1 Appellant, Ed w ard Sa nch ez H inaj as, app ealshisconviction for Aggravated S exual Assault of a Child. We dismiss the proceeding for lack of j urisdiction.2

The judgm ent indicates that sentence w as impose d on March 13, 2003. Appellant then filed a document purporting to be a notice of appeal on May 22, 2003. No m otion for new trial was filed. To be timely, a notice of appeal mus t be filed within 30 days after the sentence is imposed or s uspended in open court or w ithin 90 days af ter that date if a mot ion for

new tria l is filed. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a). Thus, app ellant's notice of appeal was due to be f

iled on or a b out April 14, 2003, but was not filed until May 22, 2003. Furthermore, he did not m ove for an ex tension of the deadline. A tim ely filed notice of

appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim . App. 1996). If the notice is not tim ely, then the cou rtof appeals can take no ac tion other than to dism iss the proceeding. I d . at 523
. Be cause appellant's notice of appeal was untim ely filed, we have no j urisdiction to consider the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Pe r C ur i am Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   9
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's annual audited financial statements and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                  3,478
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            18,414
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  9,923
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    9,707
<LOANS>                               108,265
<ALLOWANCE>                               712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        153,031
<DEPOSITS>                            124,513
<SHORT-TERM>                                0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     1,506
<LONG-TERM>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                   12
<OTHER-SE>                             18,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        153,031
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         8,222
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       1,978
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                       10,201
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      4,516
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      5,165
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   5,035
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         4,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,557
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              1,557
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,059
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.26
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                           3.71
<LOANS-NON>                               504
<LOANS-PAST>                                0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                            0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                          737
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              42
<RECOVERIES>                                2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                         712
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                      712
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                     0


</TABLE>