alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.4          Entity #C25624-1999 Document Number:20060081943-43 Date Filed:2/9/2006 8:54:58 AM In the office of Dean Heller Secretary of State  Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation. For Nevada Profit Corporations  (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390  After issuance of Stock)  1. Name of Corporation:  American Stellar Energy, Inc.  2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):  Amend Article I  Name:  The name of the Corporation is amended to Tara Gold Resources, Corp.  3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is:  51.5%  4. Effective date of filing (optional):   5. Officer signature (required): /s/ Francis Richard Biscan, Jr.            Tara Gold Certificate of Amendment (NV) 2-26-07
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERICAN BUSINESS PRODUCTS FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          41,771
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,261
<INVENTORY>                                     31,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,982
<PP&E>                                         140,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,962
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,524
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,407
<SALES>                                        111,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,939
<CGS>                                           79,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,592
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,752
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,513)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
SERVING HERE

With more than 200,000 Americans serving nationwide,
AmeriCorps brings people together to tackle some of
the nation’s most pressing challenges through national

service and volunteering.

Apply to serve at AmeriCorps.gov


é) AmeriCorps
SERVING HERE

e
© >

americorPe

With more than 200,000 Americans serving nationwide,
AmeriCorps brings people together to tackle some of
the nation’s most pressing challenges through national

service and volunteering.

Apply to serve at AmeriCorps.gov


SERVING HERE

With more than 200,000 Americans serving nationwide,
AmeriCorps brings people together to tackle some of
the nation’s most pressing challenges through national

service and volunteering.

Apply to serve at AmeriCorps.gov



é) AmeriCorps

SERVING
HERE

———
SS
SS
—— SS

With more than 200,000 Americans serving nationwide,
AmeriCorps brings people together to tackle some of
the nation’s most pressing challenges through national

service and volunteering.

Apply to serve at AmeriCorps.gov


SERVING
HERE

With more than 200,000 Americans serving nationwide,
AmeriCorps brings people together to tackle some of
the nation’s most pressing challenges through national

service and volunteering.

Apply to serve at AmeriCorps.gov


SERVING
HERE

With more than 200,000 Americans serving nationwide,
AmeriCorps brings people together to tackle some of
the nation’s most pressing challenges through national

service and volunteering.

Apply to serve at AmeriCorps.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5417 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5417

   To rename the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act as the 
              ``McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2000

Mr. LaFalce (for himself, Mr. Gephardt, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
Leach, Mr. Kanjorski, Ms. Waters, Mr. Sanders, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. Baker, 
Mr. Lazio, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Gutierrez, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. 
   Watt of North Carolina, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Bentsen, Mr. Maloney of 
    Connecticut, Ms. Hooley of Oregon, Ms. Carson, Mr. Weygand, Mr. 
Sherman, Mr. Sandlin, Mr. Meeks of New York, Ms. Lee, Mr. Mascara, Mr. 
 Inslee, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Moore, Mr. Gonzalez, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, 
Mr. Capuano, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Castle, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Ney, Mrs. Kelly, 
 Mr. Paul, Mr. LaTourette, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. 
   Sabo, Mr. Minge, Mr. Wise, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
Tierney, Mr. Waxman, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. Evans, Mrs. 
Mink of Hawaii, Mr. Spratt, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. 
 Meehan, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Danner, Mr. Dixon, Mr. Brown of Ohio, 
Mr. Boswell, Mr. McGovern, Mrs. Napolitano, Ms. Millender-McDonald, and 
    Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To rename the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act as the 
              ``McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS ASSISTANCE ACT.

    Section 1 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 11301 note; Public Law 100-77) is amended by striking subsection 
(a) and inserting the following new subsection:
    ``(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the `McKinney-Vento 
Homeless Assistance Act'.''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless 
Assistance Act shall be deemed to be a reference to the McKinney-Vento 
Homeless Assistance Act.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000072619-OCT-201208:53 AM
§ 102-33.40 What are some of GSA's responsibilities for Federal aviation management? Under OMB Circular A-126, “Improving the Management and Use of Government Aircraft,” (*http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb*) GSA's chief responsibilities for Federal aviation management are to maintain— ( a ) A single office to carry out Governmentwide responsibilities for Government aircraft management, and publishing that policy;
( b ) An interagency committee (*i.e.,* the ICAP), whose members represent the executive agencies that use Government aircraft to conduct their official business (including FAA and NTSB specifically) and advise and consult with GSA on developing policy for managing Government aircraft;
( c ) A management information system to collect, analyze, and report information on the inventory, cost, usage, and safety of Government aircraft; and
( d ) A set of performance indicators, policy recommendations, and guidance for the procurement, operation, and safety and disposal of Government aircraft.
Note to § 102-33.40 :
See OMB Circular A-126 (*http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb*) for a complete listing of GSA's responsibilities related to Federal aviation.
#### § 3013.16 Enforcement of subpoenas.

In the case of contumacy or failure to obey a subpoena issued under this subpart, the Commission may apply for an order to enforce its subpoena as permitted by 39 U.S.C. 504(f)(3).
§ 962.10 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) At a reasonable time in advance of the hearing, and with adequate notice to all parties, the Presiding Officer may conduct, in person or by telephone, one or more prehearing conference to discuss the following: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite statement;
( 3 ) Stipulations or admissions of fact or as to the contents and authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 5 ) Exchange of witness lists, copies of prior statements of witnesses, and copies of hearing exhibits;
( 6 ) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 7 ) Discovery;
( 8 ) Possible changes in the scheduled hearing date, time or site; and
( 9 ) Any other matters related to the proceeding.
( b ) Within a reasonable time after the completion of a prehearing conference, the Presiding Officer shall issue an order detailing all matters agreed upon by the parties, or ordered by the Presiding Officer, at such conference.
# 2012/20121005 National Service Criminal History Checks- Final Rule (October 5, 2012).pdf

# 2012/20121128 New Alternate Criminal History Check Source Approved for Colorado Statewide Checks_11-28-12_508.pdf

# 2012/20121205 New FAQs Available for Criminal History Checks_12-5-12_508.pdf

# 2012/20121227 Important Announcement Regarding the National Service Criminal History Check_12-27-12_508.pdf
Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM   Document 66   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023   Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      95
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,018
<OTHER-SE>                                             (1,113)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        1,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (1,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (1,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.00)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11075

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAIME RAFAEL RUIZ-OSORIO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-344-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jaime Rafael Ruiz-Osorio

raises an argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 

523 U.S. 224, 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a 

sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment. 

Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative 

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of 

the district court is AFFIRMED.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11075 Document: 00513882645 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23D0014. JIM JACKSON, SR. v. LEHERN MCGOVERN BOVIS, INC.

Jim Jackson, Sr. allegedly received an on-the-job injury in April 1999. He then

filed a series of tort claims against Lehern McGovern Bovis, Inc., the general

contractor on the project. In June 2001, the trial court dismissed Jackson’s claims

against Lehern, and this Court affirmed. Jackson v. Lehern McGovern Bovis, Inc.,

Case No. A03A2094 (decided Dec. 16, 2003). Since that time Jackson has filed

numerous pleadings regarding the matter, which were dismissed by the trial courts,

and he has been enjoined from filing any further pleadings pertaining to this matter.1

After Jackson filed another pleading in the matter, the trial court entered an order

dismissing that action on April 19, 2022. Jackson then filed this application for

discretionary appeal on June 21, 2022.

2

Pretermitting whether Jackson is entitled to a direct appeal, this case is

untimely. To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of the

entry of the order, decision, or judgment sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). 

This statutory deadline is jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application

for appeal not made in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). See In the Interest of B.

R. F., 299 Ga. 294, 298 (788 SE2d 416) (2016) (holding that an appellate court lacks

1

Jackson has appealed several of the trial court’s decisions. See Case Nos.

A12A2311 (dismissed Aug. 15, 2012), A16D0240 (dismissed Feb. 11, 2016),

A20I0171 (dismissed Feb. 18, 2020).

2

Jackson filed his application in the Supreme Court of Georgia, which

transferred the case to this Court. See Case No. S22D1149 (decided July 14, 2022).

August 16, 2022
jurisdiction over an untimely application for discretionary appeal); Hair Restoration

Specialists v. State, 360 Ga. App. 901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021) (compliance with

the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional, and failure to comply with that

procedure requires dismissal of the appeal). Because Jackson’s application was filed

63 days after the order he seeks to appeal, we lack jurisdiction to consider it.

Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/16/2022
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 544

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the small issuer

exemption from pro rata allocation of interest expense of financial institutions to tax-exempt interest.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. HAYWORTH (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the small issuer exemption from pro rata allocation of

interest expense of financial institutions to tax-exempt

interest.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN SMALL ISSUER EXEMPTION FROM

4 PRO RATA ALLOCATION OF INTEREST EX5 PENSE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS TO TAX6 EXEMPT INTEREST.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraphs (C) and (D) of

8 section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
2

•HR 544 IH

1 (pro rata allocation of interest expense of financial institu2 tions to tax-exempt interest) are each amended by striking

3 ‘‘$10,000,000’’ each place it appears and inserting

4 ‘‘$25,000,000’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 subsection (a) shall apply to bonds issued after the date

7 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 15 The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation: Re: Registration Statement
Nos. 333-45525, 333-13584, 333-88681, 333-101849, 333-115979,
333-115980 and 333-115981. Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness
of the use therein of our report dated August 4, 2004 related to our review of
interim financial information. Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant,
or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act. /s/ KPMG LLP Washington, D.C.
August 6, 2004
From: Ellen Turcio/AWA/FAA

AFS

- 820, Operations & FAAST Support Branch

To: Keira Jones/AWA/FAA@FAA,

Date: 12/03/2012 08:42 AM

Subject: Fw: Petition for Exemption FAA

- 2012

- 1189

Good Morning Ms. Jones,

Below is my email correspondence with the petitioner I am forwarding to you for record. If you need

anything else please let me know.

Thank you.



### Ellen Turcio

Aviation Safety Inspector

Commercial Operations Branch, AFS

- 820

Flight Standards Service

Federa l Aviation Administration

----- Forwarded by Ellen Turcio/AWA/FAA on 12/03/2012 08:37 AM

-----

From: Ellen Turcio/AWA/FAA

AFS

- 820, Operations & FAAST Support Branch

To: Lee, Doug A (TS)

Date: 11/29/2012 10:47 AM

Subject: RE: Petition for Exemption FAA

- 2012

- 1189

Dear Mr. Lee,

You will need to go to your docket file on http://www.regulations.gov. You may submit documentation via

comment to explain your need for includi ng the additional section(s) in your exemption, similar to your

initial request. Enter your Docket ID, FAA

- 2012

- 1189, into the search box on the home page. Once in

your docket file, click on the blue Comment Now button. Your addendum to the petition for exemption

may be uploaded to your docket file in Item 3. Upload File.

Due to processing, please note your new document may not be available to view immediately. Please

feel free to contact me if you have any further questions.

Cordially,



### Ellen Turcio

A viation Safety Inspector

Commercial Operations Branch, AFS

- 820

Flight Standards Service

Federal Aviation Administration

From: Lee, Doug A (TS)

AFS

- 820, Operations & FAAST Support Branch

To: Ellen Turcio/AWA/FAA@FAA,

Date: 11/29/2012 09:48 AM

Subject: RE: Petition for Exemption FAA

- 2012

- 1189

### Yes, I need the exemption as you stated. How do I go about updating my request?

Thanks

V/r

Doug Lee

From: Ellen Turcio

Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:22 AM

To: Lee, Doug A (TS)

Subject: Petition for Exemption FAA

- 2012

- 1189

Dear Mr. Lee,

My name is Ellen Turcio and I am with the Federal Aviation Administration in Washington D.C. I am

currently reviewing your petition for exemption from 14 CFR 91.203 (b), Regulatory Docket No. FAA

2012

- 1189. It is noted that you are not seeking an exemption to 14 CFR 91.9(b)(2). Previous and current

91.203(a) and (b) exemption precedent regarding unmanned systems has also included request for

exemption from 91.9(b)(2) to operate the unmanned system without the flight manual on board. In order

to complete my review, please update your petition by uploading an addendum to the docket if you are

simil arly requesting an exemption from 91.9(b)(2) as well as 91.203 (a) and (b).

Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions.

Thank you,

Ellen Turcio

Aviation Safety Inspector

Commercial Operations Branch, AFS

- 820

Flight Standards Service

Federal Aviation Administration
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of China Ventures Limited ("the
Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I. James N.
L. Chow Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all Material
respects, the financial condition and result of operation of the Company.


(Signature)
/s/ James N. L. Chow
--------------------
James N. L. Chow
Secretary and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
February 13, 2004
Exhibit 32(a)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alberto-Culver Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard B. Bernick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Howard B. Bernick

---

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 7, 2003