alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 9:22-cv-81546-DMM

JONATHAN PONCE,

Plaintiff,

v.

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Defendant.

___________________________________

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, JONATHAN PONCE, and Defendant, FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, hereby jointly stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with 

prejudice pursuant to amicable resolution. The Parties hereby request the Court to retain 

jurisdiction for a period of forty-five (45) days to enforce the Parties’ agreement.

DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

FOR PLAINTIFF: FOR DEFENDANT:

BY: /s/ G. Ware Cornell, Jr. BY: /s/ Lourdes Wydler

G. Ware Cornell, Jr. Lourdes Wydler

Fla. Bar No.: 203920 Fla. Bar No.: 719811

ware@warecornell.com lew@wydlerlaw.com

CORNELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A. WYDLER LAW

Counsel for Plaintiff Counsel for Defendant

2645 Executive Park Drive 2600 Douglas Road, PH-4

Weston, Fla. 33331 Coral Gables, Fla. 33134

Case 9:22-cv-81546-DMM Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2023 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using 

CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of 

record identified on the Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices 

of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel 

or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing this 22nd 

day of September, 2023.

/s/ G. Ware Cornell, Jr.

CORNELL & ASSOCIATES, P.A.

Counsel for Plaintiff

SERVICE LIST

Lourdes Wydler

Fla. Bar No. 719811

lew@wydlerlaw.com

WYDLER LAW

Counsel for Defendant

2600 Douglas Road, PH-4

Coral Gables, Fla. 33134

Ph: (305) 446-5528

Case 9:22-cv-81546-DMM Document 73 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 101-6.1001 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR chapter 102, parts 102-1 through 102-220).

For Federal advisory committee management information previously contained in this subpart, see FMR part 102-3 (41 CFR part 102-3).
§ 401.86 Security for damages or injury. An officer may detain a vessel that causes: ( a ) Damage to property of the Corporation;
( b ) Damage to goods or cargo stored on property of the Corporation; or
( c ) Injury to employees of the Corporation; until security satisfactory to the Corporation has been provided.
[39 FR 10900, Mar. 22, 1974, as amended at 65 FR 52915, Aug. 31, 2000]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-8023
TERRY A. HENDRICKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. THOMAS REED, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-819-2) Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry A. Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Terry A. Hendricks, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hendricks v. Reed , No.CA-01-819-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### §§ 3045.13-3045.14 [Reserved]
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1058

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Charles Dwayne Carter

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern

 ____________

 Submitted: May 1, 2023

Filed: May 4, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Carter appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release

and sentenced him to 24 months in prison and 1 year of supervised release. His

1The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.
counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief arguing that the revocation

sentence is substantively unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we conclude that Carter’s sentence was not unreasonable,

as there is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave

significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of

judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910,

914 (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing the district court’s decision to revoke supervised

release for abuse of discretion); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir.

2006) (explaining that a revocation sentence may be unreasonable if the district court

fails to consider a relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3353(a) factor, gives significant weight to an

improper or irrelevant factor, or commits a clear error of judgment); United States v.

White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004) (stating that a district court need not

mechanically list every § 3553(a) factor when sentencing a defendant upon

revocation; all that is required is consideration of relevant matters and some reason

for the court’s decision).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMINDS:  A microcomputer interactive data system for 8086-based controllersA microcomputer interactive data system (MINDS) software package for the 8086 family of microcomputers is described. To enhance program understandability and ease of code maintenance, the software is written in PL/M-86, Intel Corporation's high-level system implementation language. The MINDS software is intended to run in residence with real-time digital control software to provide displays of steady-state and transient data. In addition, the MINDS package provides classic monitor capabilities along with extended provisions for debugging an executing control system. The software uses the CP/M-86 operating system developed by Digital Research, Inc., to provide program load capabilities along with a uniform file structure for data and table storage. Finally, a library of input and output subroutines to be used with consoles equipped with PL/M-86 and assembly language is described.Document ID19850009267Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsSoeder, J. F.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1985Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberE-2172NASA-TP-2378NAS 1.60:2378Accession Number85N17576Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-43-3Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850009267.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1



         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEN TELECOM INC. 1992 STOCK PLAN


         At a meeting held on July 11, 2001, the Board of Directors of Allen
Telecom Inc. duly adopted a resolution amending, effective as of July 11, 2001,
Section 12 of the Allen Telecom Inc. 1992 Stock Plan, as amended (the "Plan"),
by deleting the second sentence of Section 12 in its entirety and inserting in
place thereof the following sentence:

                  "The Plan shall terminate (i) on February 27, 2004, or (ii) on
         such other date (which may be earlier or later than February 27, 2004)
         as may be determined by the Board of Directors."





Executed this 11th day of July, 2001.

/s/  Laura C. Meagher
---------------------
Laura C. Meagher
Secretary
#### § 102-118.520 Who is responsible for determining the standards for collection, compromise, termination, or suspension of collection action on any outstanding debts to my agency?

Under the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966, as amended (31 U.S.C. 3711, *et seq.*), the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General have joint responsibility for issuing standards for your agency.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32326, May 31, 2022]
§ 102-33.385 What Federally-funded aviation activities of executive agencies are exempt from the requirement to report information to GSA on Government aircraft? The following Federally-funded activities are exempt from the requirement to report information to GSA on Government aircraft: ( a ) The Armed Forces (which includes the U.S. Coast Guard); and
( b ) Agencies in the Intelligence Community.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                         22,602
<SECURITIES>                                1,751,950
<RECEIVABLES>                                  52,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,849,984
<PP&E>                                      1,201,831
<DEPRECIATION>                               (532,985)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,518,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       5,986,147
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      155,595
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,341,199)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,518,830
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              255,802
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              972,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            324,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (716,993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (716,993)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (716,993)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
#### § 101-26.102-4 Payment to GSA contractors.

Policies and procedures covering payment to GSA contractors for supplies and services furnished by GSA to Government agencies are in subpart 101-2.1.

[47 FR 8779, Mar. 2, 1982]
RODNEY RANKINS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3827

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed May 1 , 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. William F. Stone , Judge

.

Glenn M. Swiatek, Shalimar

, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon Traxler, Assistant Atto rney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of Allied.
 /s/ John J. MarcelloJohn J. MarcelloChief Executive Officer and President and Acting Principal Financial Officer *
August 13, 2010  *
    
    Mr. Marcello is also acting as the Registrants Acting Principal Financial Officer as of
the date of this filing.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.T08-0824 Safety Zone; Kentucky River, Frankfort, KY. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Kentucky River from Mile Marker (MM) 65.5 to MM 66, extending the entire width of the river.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative. A designated representative is a commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard assigned to units under the operational control of USCG Sector Ohio Valley.
( 2 ) Vessels requiring entry into this safety zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated representative. To seek entry into the safety zone, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by telephone at 502-779-5422 or on VHF-FM channel 16.
( 3 ) Persons and vessels permitted to enter this safety zone must transit at their slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful directions issued by the COTP or the designated representative.
( c ) *Enforcement period.* This section will be enforced 24 hours a day from September 7, 2024 and will continue through December 6, 2024 or until the bridge is demolished or the hazard has been mitigated, whichever occurs first.
[USCG-2024-0824, 89 FR 74135, Sept. 12, 2024]
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc. (f/k/a Vsource, Inc.)
 Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationDel Mar Acquisition, Inc.
    
    NevadaDel Mar GenPar, Inc.
    
    NevadaPoint Loma Acquisition, Inc.
    
    NevadaPoint Loma Acquisition, Inc.
    
    NevadaSurgical Center Acquisition Holdings, Inc.
    
    NevadaSurgical Center Management, Inc.
    
    NevadaVirtual Source, Inc.
    
    NevadaVsource (USA) Inc.
    
    DelawareVsource (California) Inc.
    
    CaliforniaVsource (CI) Ltd
    
    Cayman IslandsVsource (Asia) Ltd
    
    Hong KongVsource (Australia) Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaVsource (BVI) Ltd
    
    British Virgin IslandsVsource (Singapore) Pte Ltd
    
    Singapore
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00133-CV

IN RE JON EARL PHELAN RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and MEIER, J.

DELIVERED: May 6, 2011

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Exhibit 99(b)

Independent Accountants' Report





The Board of Directors

HSBC Finance Corporation:



We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 1999-1 (the loans) has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1, 1999 (the Agreement) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.  Management is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and in compliance with the audit guide for audits of non-supervised mortgagees approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (to the extent that the procedures in such audit guide are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Agreement), accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about HSBC Finance Corporation's compliance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the loans has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1, 1999 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



This report is intended solely for the information and use of the addressee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party.





/s/ KPMG LLP





March 1, 2005



Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 1999-1 has been conducted by HSBC Finance Corporation, successor by merger to Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1, 1999.



|/s/ Steve Smith
Steve Smith
Servicing Officer
HSBC Finance CorporationMarch 1, 2005
Date | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 





|/s/ Joe Vozar
Joe Vozar
Chief Financial Officer -
HSBC Finance Corporation - Consumer LendingMarch 1, 2005
Date | /s/ Jorge Cordon
Jorge Cordon
Managing Director - Operations -
HSBC Finance Corporation - Consumer
LendingMarch 1, 2005
Date
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-81772-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

MICHAEL REGER

MLR HOLDINGS 2020, LLC,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ALL THINGS GEL, LLC,

et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE; DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR CONTEMPT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Contempt [DE 309] and 

Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Contempt [DE 334] (collectively, the “Motions”) and United 

States Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe’s August 22, 2024 Report & Recommendation on DE 

334 (the “Report”) [DE 345]. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual 

findings in the Report [DE 345] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. 

LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); 

RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). The Court notes that 

Magistrate Judge McCabe held an evidentiary hearing on the Motions on August 19, 2024. See 

[DE 337]. 

 Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review 

of the Report [DE 345] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court 

agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions regarding the alleged violations at 

Case 9:22-cv-81772-WPD Document 397 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2024 Page 1 of 2
issue that forms the basis for Plaintiffs’ Motions for Contempt. See [DE 345]. The Court also 

agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusion regarding deeming paragraph 3(c)(i) 

of the May 2024 Order satisfied and relieving Cordani of any further obligation to “continue to 

make requests to YouTube.” See [DE’s 282, 345].

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [DE 345] is hereby APPROVED; 

2. The Motions for Contempt [DE’s 309, 345] are hereby DENIED;

3. Paragraph 3(c)(i) of the May 29, 2024 Order [DE 282] is hereby deemed satisfied;

4. Peter Cordani is hereby relieved of any further obligations to “continue to make 

requests to YouTube.” See id. 

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 

6th day of September, 2024.

Copies furnished to:

Judge McCabe

Counsel of Record

Case 9:22-cv-81772-WPD Document 397 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2024 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.5





 


EXHIBIT
B


FOURTH
ALLONGE TO TERM NOTE


 


This
Furth Allonge (“Allonge”), dated as of November 6, 2019, is to the Amended and Restated Secured Term Promissory Note,
dated as of August 16, 2016 in the initial principal amount of $3,000,000.00 (as amended by an Allonge dated November 13, 2017
and a Second Allonge dated April 27, 2018, and a Third Allonge dated November 14, 2018, the “Note”) made by Creative
Realities, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Creative Realities, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Conexus World Global,
LLC, a Kentucky limited liability company, and Allure Global Solutions, Inc., a Georgia corporation, jointly and severally (each,
and together herein referred to as “Maker”), payable to the order of Slipstream Communications, LLC, an Anguillan
limited liability company (the “Holder”).


 


The
Note was issued pursuant to that certain Loan and Security Agreement by and between, inter alia, Maker and the initial
Holder dated as of August 16, 2016 (as amended by the First Amendment thereto dated as of December 12, 2016, the Second Amendment
thereto dated as of November 13, 2017, the Third Amendment dated as of January 16, 2018, the Fourth Amendment dated as of April
27, 2018, the Fifth Amendment dated as of November 14 2018, the Joinder Agreement dated as of November 20, 2018 and the Sixth
Amendment dated as of November 6, 2019, and as it may be further amended, restated, supplemented, modified or otherwise changed
from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”), and are subject to the terms and conditions thereof.


 


The
Note is hereby amended to change the Maturity Date to “June 30, 2021.”


 


Except
as expressly amended hereby, the Note, including without limitation the default and acceleration provisions thereof, remain in
full force and effect, and Makers hereby confirm their liability thereunder to Holder.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Allonge is executed and attached, or copies attached, to the Note on the date first set forth above.


 





	 	MAKERS
	 	 
	 	CREATIVE REALITIES, INC.
	 	CREATIVE REALITIES, LLC
	 	CONEXUS WORLD GLOBAL, LLC
	 	ALLURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Richard Mills
	 	Name:	Richard Mills
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer