alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.705 Definition of normal operation and statutory objective. The terms *normal operation* and *statutory objective* are defined as follows: ( a ) *Normal operation* means the operation of a program or activity without significant changes that would inhibit meeting objectives.
( b ) *Statutory objective* means any purpose of a program or activity expressly stated in any Federal, State, or local statute or ordinance adopted by an elected, general purpose legislative body.
§ 3055.55 Periodicals. ( a ) *In-County Periodicals.* For the In-County Periodicals product within the Periodicals class, report the: ( 1 ) On-time service performance (as a percentage rounded to one decimal place), provided at the Postal Administrative Area and National levels; and
( 2 ) Service variance (as a percentage rounded to one decimal place) for mail delivered within +1 day, +2 days, and +3 days of its applicable service standard, provided at the Postal Administrative Area and National levels.
( b ) *Outside County Periodicals.* For the Outside County Periodicals product within the Periodicals class, report the: ( 1 ) On-time service performance (as a percentage rounded to one decimal place), disaggregated by the Destination Entry and End-to-End entry mail, provided at the Postal Administrative Area and National levels; and
( 2 ) Service variance (as a percentage rounded to one decimal place) for mail delivered within +1 day, +2 days, and +3 days of its applicable service standard, disaggregated by the Destination Entry and End-to-End entry mail, provided at the Postal Administrative Area and National levels.
[75 FR 38742, July 6, 2010, as amended at 88 FR 10042, Feb. 16, 2023]
Factual Proffer 

GABINO CARRILLO-ORTIZ, 

a/k/a Wilson Omar MEDRANO-MAEDA 

The government would prove that the defendant is an alien, with no legal status in the U.S. 

and that the defendant was found in the U.S. and after having been ordered removed and removed 

from the United States to Mexico. 

On or about September 9, 2022, the Defendant, using the name Wilson Omar MEDRANOMAEDA, was arrested in Palm Beach County, in the SDFL, on local charges. The Defendant's 

fingerprints taken in connection with his September 9, 2022, arrest in Palm Beach County were 

scanned into the IAFIS system and revealed that fingerprints belong to the individual who was 

previously removed from the United States. Immigration was alerted to his arrest. 

A review of the immigration records revealed that the Defendant was voluntary removed 

from the United States on three separate occasions: May 15, 2006, May 21, 2006, and May 24, 

2006. Thereafter, on June 3, 2006, the Defendant was encountered by law enforcement. At the 

time of the encounter, the Defendant was one of 15 migrants found on a pickup while traveling 

eastbound on I-70 in Topeka, Kansas. ICE responded and determined that all occupants were 

illegal aliens. The Defendant was deemed an inadmissible alien subsequently charged (8 USC 

1182). A review of the prepared I-213 revealed that the defendant reported he was a native and 

citizen of Mexico. (Family members were reported as Mexican Nationals). //· @ 

On June 8, 2006, an Order of removal was authorized and the Defendant on June 10, 2006, vJU "rt""oll~ 

from the United States and returned to Mexico. Thereafter, the Defendant re-entered the United (A/ /IA M, 

States unlawfully and on August 28, 2006, was removed and returned to Mexico. 

A fingerprint comparison of the prints taken of the defendant using the name Wilson Omar 

MEDRANO-MAEDA on September 9, 2022 with prints of defendant Gabino CARRILLOORTIZ in the Immigration A-file was completed by an HSI Senior Fingerprint Specialist, who 

confirmed the prints were made by one in the same person. 

On September 12, 2022, the Defendant provided a sworn statement, during which the 

· Defendant stated he was a native and citizen of Guatemala; and that his true name was Wilson 

Omar MEDRANO-MAEDA. The Defendant admitted that he entered the U.S. unlawfully; was 

previously deported in 2006; and did not receive permission / consent from the AG or Sec' y of 

Homeland Security to apply for readmission to the U.S. 

A record check oflmmigration's CLAIMS database revealed no record indicating that the 

Defendant obtained consent from the Attorney General of the United States or from the Secretary 

of Homeland Security, for re-admission into the United States. 

The government would've proven that the defendant undertook such actions knowingly 

and that such actions took place in the Southern District of Florida. 

Case 9:22-cr-80152-AMC Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2022 Page 1 of 1
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00466

- CV

JOHN LANDER v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, INC., ASSET

- BACKED

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006

- 23
On Appeal from the 224th District Cou rt of Bexar County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- CI

- 07935

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Co urt orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. February 24, 2022
§ 3045.4 Review. ( a ) The Commission will establish a docket for each market test initiated under this part, promptly publish a notice in the Federal Register, and post the filing on its website. The notice shall: ( 1 ) Describe the general nature of the proceeding;
( 2 ) Refer to the legal authority under which the proceeding is to be conducted;
( 3 ) Identify an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in the docket;
( 4 ) Specify a period for public comment; and
( 5 ) Include such other information as the Commission deems appropriate.
( b ) [Reserved]
[79 FR 54563, Sept. 11, 2014, as amended at 85 FR 9660, Feb. 19, 2020]
EXHIBIT
32.2





C.F.O.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE
ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) and 18
U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and that:  (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the
Report.
 
 /s/ Paul R. CookPaul
      R. CookExecutive
      Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)American
      Consumers, Inc.
 
 
 Date:  October
14, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             340
<SECURITIES>                                       637
<RECEIVABLES>                                      120
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         36
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,158
<PP&E>                                             392
<DEPRECIATION>                                      95
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               65
<BONDS>                                            877
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           358
<OTHER-SE>                                         208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,566
<SALES>                                             84
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   340
<CGS>                                               67
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    108
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 67
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        67
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
        

</TABLE>
250 E Street SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000 / 800-942-2677

202-606-5000 / 800-942-2677

APPENDIX III

About Public Health AmeriCorps

Public Health AmeriCorps is investing $400 million over five years from the American Rescue 

Plan Act workforce funding to enable the recruitment, training, and development of a new 

generation of public health leaders who are ready to respond to the nation’s most pressing 

public health needs. 

Public Health AmeriCorps has two main goals: 

• Help meet public health needs of local communities by providing needed capacity 

and support in state and local public health settings and advancing more equitable 

health outcomes for communities who are currently or historically underserved. 

• Provide pathways to good quality public health-related careers by providing exposure 

through onsite experience, training, and more, with a focus on recruiting AmeriCorps 

members who reflect the communities in which they will serve. 

For more information on Public Health AmeriCorps, visit www.americorps.gov/publichealth.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, David A. Berg, certifythat:

1.                                       I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q ofAmerican Crystal Sugar Company (the registrant);

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for theregistrant and have:

a)                                      designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)                                     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)                                      disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and.

5.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors:

a)                                      all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of the internal controls over financialreporting which are likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)                                     any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| July 16, 2007 |   | /s/ DAVID A. BERG |   |
|---------------|--------|-------------------|--------|
|          |   | David A. Berg     |
|          |   | President         |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Angela E. Noble

Court Administrator • Clerk of Court

400 North Miami Avenue, Room 8N09

Miami, Florida 33128−7716

(305)523−5100

Date: December 6, 2022

Attn: Civil Correspondence Clerk

Clerk of Circuit and County Courts

138 Dade County Courthouse

73 West Flagler Street

Miami, FL 33130

RE: District Court Case No.: 1:22−cv−23355−JEM

 State Court Case No.: 22−025496 SP 23

Dear Sir/Madam:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1447, a certified copy of the District Court's Order of Remand must be mailed to

to the Clerk of the State Court.

Please acknowledge receipt of the Order in the above referenced case by signing and returning the enclosed

copy of this letter.

Angela E. Noble, Clerk of Court

By /s/ Meaghan A Brown

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:22-cv-23355-JEM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2022 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Angela E. Noble

Court Administrator • Clerk of Court

400 North Miami Avenue, Room 8N09

Miami, Florida 33128−7716

(305)523−5100

Date: December 6, 2022

Attn: Civil Correspondence Clerk

Clerk of Circuit and County Courts

138 Dade County Courthouse

73 West Flagler Street

Miami, FL 33130

RE: District Court Case No.: 1:22−cv−23355−JEM

 State Court Case No.: 22−025496 SP 23

Dear Sir/Madam:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1447, a certified copy of the District Court's Order of Remand must be mailed

to the Clerk of the State Court.

Please acknowledge receipt of the Order in the above referenced case by signing and returning the enclosed

copy of this letter.

Clerk's Acknowledgment of Receipt

The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the

District Court's certified copy of the Order of Remand.

By:_________________________________

 Deputy Clerk

On:___________________

Angela E. Noble, Clerk of Court

By /s/ Meaghan A Brown

Deputy Clerk

Case 1:22-cv-23355-JEM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2022 Page 2 of 2
'.t910-I3-U] DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-20IX-XXXXX; Directorate Identifier 2008-SW-25-AD] !UN 2120-AA64 Ainvorthincss Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company (Robinson) Model R22, R22 Alpha, R22 Beta, and R22 Mariner Helicopters, and Model R44, and R44 II Helicopters AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration. DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: This document proposes adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for Robinson Model R22, R22 Alpha, R22 Beta, and R22 Mariner helicopters, and Madej R44 and R44 IIhelicopters. The AD would require visually inspecting each tail rotor (T/R) control pedal bearing block support (support) for acrack. measuring the thickness ofeach support, installing support safety tabs on certain supports, and replacing supports ofacertain thickness during overhaul. This proposal is prompted by two reports of Madej R22 helicopters experiencing broken supports during flight. which resulted in the T/R control pedals becoming jammed. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent the supports from breaking, which can bind the T/R control pedals, resulting in areduction of yaw control and subsequent loss of control ofthe helicopter. ()ATES: Comments must be received on or before [insert date 60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register]. ADDRESSES: Usc one ofthe following addresses to submit comments on this proposed AD:

• Federal eRulemaking 1'0I1al: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments .
• Fax: 202-493-2251. O:;U':ll'.£>.tf~ Ol.n•••.•

tl \1l'Ol. ACO Egr' ~l tAU,),\" 

# £'5J-rie.W ~-'8'-1O ACOJ\I~r

1--'

### 6'-<;'IU"",, '''';{Nrtf

.,~ ll'~.~, 'll,,' " 

### IZd- """~~ 

# '''61'1J/U

'

# .."'

### ..,,',"""

.• n, 'I' .~,
1\11

,II', .• ",.,
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6732

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ARTHUR SEAN WARNER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Clarksburg

. Irene M. Keeley , Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cr - 00081

- IMK

- JES

- 1; 1:15

- cv 0 0 164

- IMK

- JES )

Submitted : October 26, 2017 Decided: November 15, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Arthur Sean Warner, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bind ing precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Arthur Sean Warner seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Warner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unle ss a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a de batable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Warner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 10
                                                                      ----------


                              THE ALLEN GROUP INC.

                          Key Employee Severance Policy

                                 Amendment No. 3
                                 ---------------



1.   The first clause of the first sentence of Section I is hereby amended and
     restated in its entirety to read as follows:

                  If a key employee's employment with the Company shall be
                  terminated by the Company other than for "cause" or
                  "disability" or by the employee for "good reason" (as these
                  terms are hereinafter defined), and provided that such key
                  employee executes a separation agreement and general release
                  as provided in Section X, then the employee shall be entitled
                  to the benefits provided below:


2.   A new Section X entitled "Execution of Company-Approved Separation
     Agreement and General Release" hereby is added to the end of this Policy as
     follows:

                  The payment of the severance benefit described in Section I of
                  this Policy shall be conditioned upon and subject to the terms
                  of a separation agreement and general release executed by the
                  employee (which contains a release of all such employee's
                  existing rights and legal claims against the Company) in a
                  form acceptable to the Company.


September, 1996




                                     -86-
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5284 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5284

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States customhouse located at 101 East Main 
  Street in Norfolk, Virginia, as the ``Owen B. Pickett United States 
                             Customhouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States customhouse located at 101 East Main Street in 
Norfolk, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ``Owen B. 
Pickett United States Customhouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States customhouse referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Owen B. 
Pickett United States Customhouse''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on January 3, 2001.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```