alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6157

RICKY LAFAYETTE MURRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JEFFREY D. YOUNGS, Official Capacity; J.

BENJAMIN APLIN; SYMMES W. CULBERTSON; FLETCHER

N. SMITH, JR.; DAWN V. KOFFS KEY; SUSAN M.

JOHNSTON, all defendants in their individual

capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(9:06-cv-03137-DCN)

Submitted: May 10, 2007 Decided: May 15, 2007 

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Lafayette Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Tommy Evans, Jr., SOUTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICE,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Lafayette Murray appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Murray v.

Youngs, No. 9:06-cv-03137-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 102-118.350 What agency has the authority to grant an exemption from the transportation prepayment audit requirement?

Only the Administrator of General Services or their designee has the authority to grant an exemption for a specific time period from the prepayment audit requirement. The Administrator may exempt bills, a particular mode or modes of transportation, or an agency or subagency from a prepayment audit and verification and in lieu thereof require a postpayment audit, based on cost effectiveness, public interest, or other factors the Administrator considers appropriate (31 U.S.C. 3726(a)(2)).
Exhibit







AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT






To:  Ms. Helen, Zhang Wei 




Dear Helen:




Position/Term


		
	a)
	Your assignment in the capacity of Asia President & Senior Strategic Advisor has been established and this letter will be effective as of September 1st, 2019. You will have a reporting relationship to Bruce Hoechner, President and Chief Executive Officer, during the course of your assignment of September 1st 2019 to March 31st 2020.




		
	b)
	The assignment will be reviewed one month before the expiration.  It can be extended based on the mutual agreement between company and the employee.




Scope and Responsibilities


		
	a)
	Lead and drive the development and implementation of Asia Strategy during the term of the position, with the intent of transitioning the commercial aspect of the role to Paul Pang after completion of the term;




		
	b)
	Support the leadership transition in Asia via mentoring Paul Pang and continuously coach and develop the Asia leadership team on an as requested basis;




		
	c)
	Assist with any due diligence support for on-going acquisition activity for both PES and for Rogers in general in coordination with the Sr. VP of Business Strategy; and




		
	d)
	Maintain high level relationships with local authorities in China.




Working Hours and Locations


		
	a)
	During September 1st – December 31st, 2019, you are required to maintain your standard working schedule;




		
	b)
	From January 1st – March 31st, you are required to work 20 hours per week which is subject to business needs; and




		
	c)
	You are eligible for work from home and you may also use Rogers’ offices as your workplace.













Compensation/Benefits


		
	a)
	During September 1st to December 31st, 2019, your compensation and benefits will remain unchanged.




		
	b)
	Effective from January 1st, 2020, your monthly base salary for the Senior Advisor role is RMB 115,000 per month before tax and subject to any income tax required by government.




		
	c)
	You are not eligible for the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (AICP) or Long Term Incentive Compensation (LIT) from January 1st, 2020.




		
	d)
	You will continue to be eligible for total RMB 285,000 of your home and gasoline allowances as well as pension insurance during January 1st to March 31st, 2020.






We look forward to your continued success in this assignment.  If during the assignment you feel you are running into unexpected difficulties not addressed in this letter, please contact me.  The success of your assignment is important to Rogers, and we want to ensure that the experience is a positive one for you.






Date: October 7, 2019




                


	
				
	Sincerely,
	 
	Received and accepted:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Bruce Hoechner
	 
	/s/ Helen Zhang
	 

	Bruce Hoechner
	 
	Helen, Zhang Wei
	 

	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	Asia President & Senior Strategic Advisor
	 










	
		
	Cc:
	Ben Buckley

	 
	Grace Gu
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5215

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude national service

educational awards from the recipient’s gross income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 2000

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

national service educational awards from the recipient’s

gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF NATIONAL SERVICE EDU4 CATIONAL AWARDS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 117 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to qualified scholarships) is

7 amended by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(e) QUALIFIED NATIONAL SERVICE EDUCATIONAL

9 AWARDS.—
2

•HR 5215 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Gross income for any tax2 able year shall not include any qualified national

3 service educational award.

4 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED NATIONAL SERVICE EDU5 CATIONAL AWARD.—For purposes of this

6 subsection—

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified

8 national service educational award’ means any

9 amount received by an individual in a taxable

10 year as a national service educational award

11 under section 148 of the National and Commu12 nity Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12604) to

13 the extent (except as provided in subparagraph

14 (C)) such amount does not exceed the qualified

15 tuition and related expenses (as defined in sub16 section (b)(2)) of the individual for such taxable

17 year.

18 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATION OF EXPENSES.—

19 The total amount of the qualified tuition and

20 related expenses (as so defined) which may be

21 taken into account under subparagraph (A)

22 with respect to an individual for the taxable

23 year shall be reduced (after the application of

24 the reduction provided in section 25A(g)(2)) by

25 the amount of such expenses which were taken
3

•HR 5215 IH

1 into account in determining the credit allowed

2 to the taxpayer or any other person under sec3 tion 25A with respect to such expenses.

4 ‘‘(C) EXCEPTION TO LIMITATION.—The

5 limitation under subparagraph (A) shall not

6 apply to any portion of a national service edu7 cational award used by such individual to repay

8 any student loan described in section 148(a)(1)

9 of such Act or to pay any interest expense de10 scribed in section 148(a)(4) of such Act.’’

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 this section shall apply to amounts received in taxable

13 years beginning after December 31, 1999.

Æ
#### § 102-118.115 Must my agency use a GBL?

No, your agency is not required to use a GBL and must use commercial payment practices to the maximum extent possible. Effective March 31, 2002, your agency must phase out the use of the GBL for domestic shipments. After this date, your agency may use the GBL solely for international shipments.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 48812, Sept. 24, 2001; 87 FR 32324, May 31, 2022]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4884

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

200 West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, as the ‘‘William S. Broomfield Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 19, 2000

Mr. KNOLLENBERG (for himself, Mr. UPTON, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. EHLERS,

Mr. CAMP, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. BARCIA, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. STUPAK, Ms. STABENOW, Mr.

BONIOR, Mr. CONYERS, and Ms. RIVERS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, as the ‘‘William S. Broomfield Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 200 West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan,

6 and known as the Royal Oak Post Office, shall be known
2

•HR 4884 IH

1 and designated as the ‘‘William S. Broomfield Post Office

2 Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

6 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

7 to the ‘‘William S. Broomfield Post Office Building’’.

Æ
Exhibit
32 (a)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Yearly Report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard F.
Govatski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
Richard F. Govatski


Richard
F. Govatski


Chief
Executive Officer
#### Burlington Voluntary Relief Department of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Anna E. White, Administratrix.

Filed June 26, 1894.

No. 5356.

Mutual Insurance Associations in Connection with. Railroad Companies: Membership: Estoppel: Waiver. The questions presented by this case being substantially the same as those decided in *Burlington Voluntary Belief Department v. White,*41 Neb., 547, the judgment is affirmed for the same reasons.

*562Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J.

*Marquett & Deweese, John H. Ames,*and *Byron Clark,*for plaintiff in error.

*Matthew Gering, eontra.*

Irvine, C.

This case is based upon the same state of facts as that of *Burlington Voluntary Relief Department v. White,*41 Neb., 547, just decided. Here Mrs. White, as administratrix, sues to recover the disability benefits which accrued to White before his death. The trials were separate, and there are some differences in the evidence and in the instructions, but none of them is material. The cases were submitted upon the same briefs, and it is recognized by the parties that upon the principal questions involved the same considerations must control both cases.

Upon an examination of rules 54 and 55 of the associa- ' tion it is perhaps doubtful whether, in the case of the death of a member at a time when disability benefits have accrued, those benefits do not become consolidated with the death benefit and payable to his beneficiary rather than to his personal representative. We do not understand, however, that counsel contend for this construction, nor do we find that the question is raised by the record.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 778.7 How does the Postal Service communicate with state and local officials concerning the Postal Service's facility project actions? ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) The Postal Service provides notice directly to affected state, areawide, regional, and local entities in a state of a proposed direct Federal development project if: ( 1 ) The state has not adopted a process under the Order; or
( 2 ) The development project involves a facility project action category not selected for the state process.
This notice may be made by publication in local newspapers and/or by letter.
#### § 102-117.90 May I use a U.S. Government bill of lading (GBL) to acquire freight, household goods or other related transportation services?

You may use the Government bill of lading (GBL) only for international shipments (including domestic offshore shipments).

[75 FR 31393, Aug. 20, 2010]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5557

To amend the Fair Housing Act to modify certain requirements for the

design and construction of certain multifamily housing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. SANFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Fair Housing Act to modify certain requirements for the design and construction of certain multifamily housing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Building Act of

5 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. FAIR HOUSING ACT AMENDMENT.

7 Section 804 of the Fair Housing Act is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (f)(2)(C), by inserting ‘‘except

9 as provided in paragraph (10),’’ after ‘‘(C)’’; and

10 (2) by adding at the end the following:
2

•HR 5557 IH

1 ‘‘(10) The requirements of paragraph (3)(C) shall not

2 apply with respect to any individual dwelling unit that has

3 been so designed and constructed that it can readily be

4 converted to comply with those requirements, and is so

5 converted upon the request of a potential occupant of that

6 particular unit.’’.

Æ
#### § 101-26.508-3 Consolidation of requisitions.

To the maximum extent feasible, agencies shall develop procedures which will permit planned consolidated requisitioning of EDP tape and instrumentation tape (wide and intermediate band) on an agencywide basis. When agencywide consolidation is not feasible, consideration shall be given to the consolidation of individual requisitions for small quantities at any agency level. This will enable the Government to benefit from lower prices generally obtainable through large volume procurements.

[43 FR 32766, July 28, 1978]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO HAC VICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Marvin S. Putnam of the law firm Latham & Watkins LLP

appears as counsel for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal, and requests that all papers served in this case 

also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Per Rule 4(b)(4) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, Mr. Putnam was previously admitted 

to appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen

and states that all information provided in support of his initial pro hac vice motion remains current 

and correct, including the sponsoring co-counsel.

Dated: May 8, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida Bar No. 305596 

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Shaquille O’Neal

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 2 of 2
H. R. 5229

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 219 South

Church Street in Odum, Georgia, as the ‘‘Ruth Harris Coleman Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

219 South Church Street in Odum, Georgia, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Ruth Harris Coleman Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ruth Harris

Coleman Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 24.8

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik, and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as
the case may be, of United Surgical Partners International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every
act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of
said attorneys-in-fact or its substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

| |  | /s/BOONE POWELL, JR.Boone Powell, Jr.
| |  | -------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61399-CIV-SMITH

DOUGLAS FAIRWEATHER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

[DE 19] on the Parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment [DE 9, 10]. In their Joint 

Supplemental Status Report [DE 18], the Parties agree that remand to Defendant is appropriate.

Pursuant to this Court’s power to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the 

Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions, under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g), and given the Parties’ joint request to remand this action for further administrative 

proceedings, this Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 

U.S.C. § 405(g) with remand of the cause to the Commissioner. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 

292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

Upon remand, the Appeals Council shall instruct the Administrative Law Judge: (i) to

reconsider the objective medical evidence; (ii) further evaluate the medical opinions of record; (iii) 

further evaluate the residual functional capacity in accordance with SSR 96-8p; (iv) offer a hearing; 

(v) take any further steps needed to update the record; and (vi) issue a new decision.

Accordingly, it is 

Case 0:22-cv-61399-RS Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED that 

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 9] is DENIED as moot.

2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 12] is DENIED as moot.

3. The Parties’ Joint Motion for Remand [DE 17] is GRANTED.

4. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED.

5. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings.

6. All pending motions not otherwise ruled on are DENIED as moot.

7. This case is CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 11th day of August 2023.

cc: Counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-61399-RS Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-118.510 Can my agency revise or alter a GSA Form 7931, Certificate of Settlement?

Generally, no, an agency must not revise or alter amounts on a GSA Form 7931. The only change an agency can make to a GSA Form 7931 is to change the agency financial data to a correct cite. Any GSA Form 7931 that cannot be paid (e.g., an amount previously paid), must be immediately returned to the GSA Transportation Audits Division with an explanation.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32326, May 31, 2022]
§ 102-3.65 What are the public notification requirements for discretionary advisory committees? A notice to the public in the Federal Register is required when a discretionary advisory committee is established, renewed, reestablished, or a new discretionary committee is established as the result of a merger of existing committees. The notices should be written in plain language and should not assume that the public has background knowledge or familiarity with an agency or the advisory committee. The agency is also strongly encouraged to make the notice available electronically in the languages represented by the affected communities on the agency's advisory committee website, if one exists, as well as use additional notification methods (such as an agency's social media accounts) to reach advisory committee stakeholders (such as professional trade or membership groups, civic groups, community-based organizations, ethnic media, representatives of affected stakeholder groups, and colleges and universities). Electronic notices must meet the requirements of title VI and E.O. 13166, as well as obligations under relevant sections of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 794. ( a ) *Procedure.* Upon receiving notice from the Secretariat that its review is complete in accordance with § 102-3.60(a), the agency must publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing that the advisory committee is being established (including due to a merger), renewed, or reestablished. When establishing a new advisory committee, the notice also must describe the nature and purpose of the advisory committee and affirm that the advisory committee is necessary and in the public interest.
( b ) *Time required for notices.* Notices of advisory committee establishment (including due to a merger) and reestablishment must appear at least 15 calendar days before the charter is filed, except that the Secretariat may approve less than 15 calendar days when requested by the agency in exceptional circumstances (such as a national emergency or natural disaster). This requirement for advance notice does not apply to advisory committee renewals, notices of which may be published concurrently with the filing of the charter.