1

NOTICE OF FUNDING OPPORTUNITY

Federal Agency Name: Corporation for National and Community Service

Funding Opportunity Title: FY 2020 AmeriCorps Tribes Grants

Announcement Type: Initial Announcement

CFDA Number: 94.006

Disclosure: Publication of this Notice of Funding Opportunity (Notice) does not obligate the 

Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) to award any specific number of 

grants or to commit any particular amount of funding.

Important Dates

• Applications are due Wednesday, May 6, 2020 by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time to CNCS. 

• Successful applicants will be notified by July 6, 2020.

A. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

1. Purpose of AmeriCorps Funding

The mission of CNCS is to improve lives, strengthen communities, and foster civic engagement

through service and volunteering. Through AmeriCorps, Senior Corps, and the Volunteer 

Generation Fund, CNCS has helped to engage millions of citizens in meeting community and 

national challenges through service and volunteer action.

AmeriCorps grants are awarded to eligible organizations (see Eligible Applicants section) 

proposing to engage AmeriCorps members in evidence-based or evidence-informed 

interventions/practices to strengthen communities. An AmeriCorps member is an individual who 

engages in community service through an approved national service position. Members may 

receive a living allowance and other benefits while serving. Upon successful completion of their 

service, members earn a Segal AmeriCorps Education Award from the National Service Trust 

that members can use to pay for higher education expenses or apply to qualified student loans.

2. Funding Priorities

CNCS seeks to prioritize the investment of national service resources in the following areas:

• Economic Opportunity – increasing economic opportunities for communities by 

preparing people for the workforce.

• Education – improving student academic performance in Science, Technology, 

Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM), and/or serving students who attend Bureau of 

Indian Education (BIE) schools.

• Healthy Futures - reducing and/or preventing prescription drug and opioid abuse. 

• Veterans and Military Families - positively impacting the quality of life of veterans and 

improving military family strength.
2

To receive priority consideration, applicants must show that the priority area is a significant part 

of the program focus and intended outcomes, and must include a high-quality program design. 

Proposing programs that receive priority consideration does not guarantee funding. 

3. National Performance Measures 

All applications (except planning grant applications – see below) must include at least one 

aligned performance measure (output and outcome) that corresponds to the proposed primary 

intervention. This may be a National Performance Measure or an applicant-determined measure. 

Additional performance measures, including output-only National Performance Measures, may 

also be included if desired; however, all performance measures must be consistent with the 

program’s Theory of Change and represent significant program activities. CNCS does not expect 

applicants to select performance measures to correspond to each and every potential member 

activity or community impact. CNCS values the quality of performance measures over the 

quantity of performance measures.

CNCS expects applicants to use National Performance Measures as part of their comprehensive 

performance management strategy if the National Performance Measures are part of the 

applicant’s theory of change. Applicants should use both performance and evaluation data to 

learn from their work as well as make tactical and strategic adjustments to achieve their goals. 

For more information, please refer to the National Performance Measure Instructions.

Planning grant applications must use one performance measure focused on the planning process. 

See the Planning Grant Performance Measure Instructions for additional guidance.

4. Program Authority

Awards under this Notice are authorized by the National and Community Service Act of 1990, as 

amended, (42 U.S.C. § 12501 et seq.).

B. FEDERAL AWARD INFORMATION

1. Estimated Available Funds

CNCS expects a highly competitive AmeriCorps grant competition. CNCS reserves the right to 

prioritize providing funding to existing awards over making new awards. The actual level of 

funding will be subject to the availability of annual appropriations.

2. Estimated Award Amount

Grant awards have two components: operating funds and AmeriCorps member positions. Award 

amounts will vary, as determined by the scope of the projects. 

3. Project Period

CNCS anticipates making three-year grant awards. CNCS generally makes an initial award for 

the first year of operation, based on a one-year project period. Continuation awards for 

subsequent years are not guaranteed; they depend upon availability of appropriations and 

satisfactory performance. 

The project start date may not occur prior to the date CNCS awards the grant. AmeriCorps 

members may not enroll prior to the start date of the award. AmeriCorps members may not begin 
3

service prior to the beginning of the member enrollment period as designated in the grant award. 

A program may not certify any hours a member performs prior to the beginning of the member 

enrollment period.

The project period for a planning grant cannot exceed 12 months and the planning grant award 

covers only a one-year period of time.

4. Type of Award 

AmeriCorps Operating Grants: CNCS may award a Cost Reimbursement or a Fixed Amount 

grant to any successful applicant, but the availability of a Full-Cost Fixed Amount grant is 

limited to certain applicants. Professional Corps are not eligible to apply for Cost 

Reimbursement grants. See the Eligible Applicants section and the Mandatory Supplemental 

Guidance for more information. CNCS will not provide both types of grants for the same project 

in one fiscal year.

AmeriCorps Planning Grants: CNCS is seeking applications for planning grants that will be used 

to develop national service models. Planning grants are only available as a Cost Reimbursement 

grant.

Grant Types Cost Reimbursement Fixed Amount

Available 

Subtypes

Traditional Planning

Grant

Full-Cost Education 

Award Program 

(EAP)

Professional Corps 

See Sec. D.6.a.2 for 

further requirements 

No Cost Slots

Maximum Cost 

per MSY

$15,479 N/A $15,479 $800 $1,000 $0

Type of Slots in 

the National 

Service Trust

Full-time, 

Three 

Quartertime, 

Half-time, 

Reduced 

half-time, 

Quartertime, 

Minimum 

Time

N/A Fulltime, Three 

Quarter-time, 

Half-time, 

Reduced halftime, Quartertime, Minimum 

Time

Full-time, Three 

Quarter-time, 

Half-time, 

Reduced halftime, Quartertime, Minimum 

Time

Full-time only Full-time, 

Three 

Quarter-time, 

Half-time, 

Reduced halftime, Quartertime, 

Minimum 

Time

Budget 

Submission 

Required

Yes No Yes, if requesting 

operating funds

No

Availability of 

Funds linked to 

enrollment and 

retention of 

awarded MSYs

No Yes No
4

Special 

Requirements

N/A N/A Must place qualified 

professionals in 

communities with an 

inadequate number 

of such professionals. 

Member salaries and 

benefits must be paid 

entirely by 

organization where 

member serves and 

not included in 

budget.

N/A

Financial 

Reporting 

Requirements

Yes No

Available to new 

Applicants

Yes No Yes

C. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

1. Eligible Applicants

The following Non-Federal entities (as defined in 2 CFR §200.69) are eligible to apply: 

• Indian tribes (2 CFR §200.54)

In addition to Indian tribes as defined in 2 CFR 200.54, tribal organizations that are controlled, 

sanctioned, or chartered by federally recognized Indian tribes are also eligible to apply. If an 

entity applies for an award as a tribal organization that is controlled or chartered by one or more 

Indian tribes, the organization must provide copies of, or links to, documentation which 

demonstrates that the organization is controlled or chartered by a federally recognized Indian 

tribe. If an entity applies as an organization sanctioned by a federally recognized tribe, or 

multiple specific federally recognized tribes, it must submit a sanctioning resolution, adopted by 

the Tribal Council (or comparable tribal governing body) of each Indian tribe. The resolution(s) 

must identify the entity applying for a CNCS award by name as a tribal organization that is 

sanctioned, the Indian tribe(s) for the purpose of applying for CNCS funding (or federal grant 

funds generally). 

Entities must have a Dun and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and be 

registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) to receive an award. See section D.3. 

for more information.

New Applicants

CNCS encourages organizations that have not received prior funding from CNCS to apply. The 

general practice is to award no more than 50 member positions (slots) to organizations receiving 

an AmeriCorps grant for the first time. 

New applicants are eligible to apply for Cost Reimbursement and Education Award Program 

(EAP) grant but are not eligible to apply for Full-cost Fixed Amount grants. 
5

2. Threshold Issues

Applications should reflect that they meet the following threshold requirements for the grant type 

for which they are applying. 

• Professional Corps applicants and/or applicants determined to be a Professional Corps by 

CNCS must demonstrate that the community in which it will place AmeriCorps members 

serving as professionals has an inadequate number of said professionals. 

• If the proposed service activities require specialized member qualifications and/or training 

(for example, tutoring programs: 45 CFR §2522.910-.940), the applicant must describe how 

the program will meet these requirements. 

3. Cost Sharing or Matching

Fixed Amount Grants 

There is no match requirement for Fixed Amount grants. CNCS does not provide all the funds 

necessary to operate the program, therefore organizations should raise the additional revenue 

required to operate the program. 

Cost Reimbursement Grants 

Applicants are required to match funds based on the chart below. The applicant’s match can be

federal or non-federal cash and/or in-kind contributions. Applicants must demonstrate the ability 

to meet the match requirement at the time of application submission. See Section D.6. Funding 

Restrictions for more information.

A first-time successful applicant is required to match at 24 percent for the first three-year 

funding period. Starting with year four, the match requirement gradually increases every year to 

50 percent by year ten, according to the minimum overall share chart found in 45 CFR §2521.60 

and below.

AmeriCorps 

Funding Year

1, 2, 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+

Grantee Share 

Requirements

24% 26% 30% 34% 38% 42% 46% 50%

Section 121(e)(5) of NCSA (42 U.S.C. 12571(e)) requires programs that use other federal funds 

as match for an AmeriCorps grant to report the amount and source of these funds to CNCS on a 

Federal Financial Report. Grantees must track and be prepared to report on that match separately 

each year and at closeout. 

The living allowance or salary provided to AmeriCorps members in Professional Corps programs 

(see Mandatory Supplemental Guidance) does not count toward the matching requirement.

Alternative Match

Under certain circumstances, applicants may qualify to meet alternative matching requirements 

that increase over the years to 35 percent instead of 50 percent as specified in the regulations at 

45 CFR §2521.60(b). To qualify, applicants must demonstrate that the proposed program is 

either located in a rural county or in a severely economically distressed community as defined in 

the Application Instructions. Applicants who plan to request an alternative match schedule must 
6

submit a request at the time the application is submitted. Submit requests to

ACAlternateMatchRequests@cns.gov.

Match Waiver Requests 

CNCS can waive the matching requirements if doing so would be equitable due to a lack of 

available financial resources at the local level. In accordance with Executive Order 13175, 

“Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,” CNCS will consider requests 

to waive the matching requirements for Indian tribes or tribal organizations with a general view 

toward increasing opportunities for utilizing flexible policy approaches at the Indian tribal level. 

Indian tribes and tribal organizations must submit any requests for waivers in writing to 

tribalmatchwaivers@cns.gov. The waiver request must include the following:

• A statement that the applicant’s match requirement cannot be met due to a lack of available 

financial resources at the local level. 

• A concise explanation of what steps the applicant has taken to raise match or ascertain its 

future ability to raise match. 

• A statement of how much of the match has been/is expected to be raised. 

• A request for a specific amount of match to be waived. 

• Any other information that may be helpful in considering this application. 

• Upon receipt of an application for a waiver of a match requirement, the assigned CNCS 

official shall review the request, seeking clarification from the applicant as needed. If the 

waiver is approved in whole or in part, the assigned CNCS official shall: 

• Ask the applicant to revise the budget in eGrants to reflect the new match amount. 

• Execute an amendment to the award, if needed. 

• Document the decision in the official grant file. 

• Notify the applicant in writing of the decision.

4. Other Eligibility Requirements

Under Section 132A(b) of the National and Community Service Act of 1990, as amended, 

organizations that have been convicted of a federal crime may not receive assistance described in 

this Notice. 

Applications that propose to engage in activities that are prohibited under CNCS’s statutes, 

regulations, or the terms and conditions of its awards are not eligible to receive CNCS funding.

Note that under appropriations provisions annually enacted by Congress, if CNCS is aware that 

any corporation has any unpaid federal tax liability—

• that has been assessed

• for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed 

• that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority 

responsible for collecting the tax liability—

that corporation is not eligible for an award under this Notice. However, this exclusion will not 

apply to a corporation which a federal agency has considered for suspension or debarment and 

has made a determination that suspension or debarment is not necessary to protect the interests of 

the federal government.
7

Pursuant to the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, an organization described in the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986, 26 U.S.C. 501 (c)(4) that engages in lobbying activities is not eligible to 

apply for CNCS funding.

D. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION

This Notice should be read together with the AmeriCorps Regulations, 45 CFR §§ 2520–2550, 

the Mandatory Supplemental Guidance, Application Instructions, and the National Performance 

Measure Instructions which are incorporated by reference. These documents can be found on 

www.nationalservice.gov/grants-funding/funding-resources/cncs-funding-opportunitiesresources. The full Regulations are available online at www.ecfr.gov. 

1. Address to Request an Application Package

Applicants should refer to CNCS Funding Opportunities for more information and instructions 

on how to fully respond to this Notice. Applicants can also send an email to

americorpsgrants@cns.gov for a printed copy of the application materials. CNCS also offers live 

text chat at www.NationalService.gov/contact-us. 

2. Content and Form of Application Submission

a. Application Content

In CNCS’s web-based management system, applicants will enter the following components of a 

complete application: 

• Standard Form 424 (SF-424) Face Sheet: This is automatically generated when applicants 

complete the data elements in the system

• Narratives

• Executive Summary - This is a brief description of the proposed program. Executive 

Summaries of all compliant applications are made available to the public following grant 

awards.

• Program Design 

• Organizational Capability 

• Cost Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy 

• Evaluation Plan (if applicable)

• Logic Model

• Standard Form 424 Budget

• Performance Measures

• Authorization, Assurances, and Certification (https://espan.cns.gov/cnsmisc/ECERTS.HTM, 

and https://espan.cns.gov/cnsmisc/EASSUR.HTM)

b. Page Limits

There are page limits for the Narrative and Logic Model

Narrative

Applications must not exceed 10 double-spaced pages for the Narratives. Planning grants may 

not exceed more than seven pages. 
8

The application sections that count towards the page limit are the:

• SF-424 Face Sheet 

• Executive Summary 

• Program Design, Organizational Capability, and Cost-Effectiveness & Budget Adequacy 

narratives.

The application page limit does not include the Budget, Performance Measures, or any required 

additional documents.

Logic Model

The Logic Model may not exceed three pages when printed with the application from the 

“Review” tab in CNCS’s web-based management system. 

Please note that the length of the application as a word processing document may differ from the 

length of the document printed out from eGrants. CNCS strongly encourages applicants to 

print out the application from the “Review and Submit” tab in eGrants prior to submission 

in order to confirm that the application does not exceed the page limit.

CNCS will not consider the results of any alternative printing methods when determining if an 

application complies with the page limit. Reviewers will also not consider material that is over 

the page limit, even if eGrants allows applicants to enter and submit additional text.

3. Dun and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) and System for Award 

Management (SAM) 

Applications must include a DUNS number and an Employer Identification Number. The DUNS 

number does not replace an Employer Identification Number. Applicants can obtain a DUNS 

number at no cost by calling the DUNS number request line at (866) 705-5711 or by applying 

online at the DUNS Request Service. CNCS recommends registering at least 30 days before the 

application due date. 

After obtaining a DUNS number, all applicants must register with the System for Award 

Management (SAM) at www.sam.gov/SAM/ and maintain an active SAM registration until the 

application process is complete. If an applicant is awarded a grant, it must maintain an active 

SAM registration throughout the life of the award. Please note SAM.gov has a new login 

process. Please go to the General Services Administration (GSA) SAM Update page for more 

information: www.sam.gov/SAM/. 

SAM registration must be renewed annually. CNCS suggests that applicants finalize a new 

registration or renew an existing one at least three weeks before the application deadline, to 

allow time to resolve any issues that may arise. Applicants must use their SAM-registered 

legal name and address on all grant applications to CNCS.

Applicants that do not comply with these requirements may become ineligible to receive an 

award. See the SAM Quick Guide for Grantees at:

www.sam.gov/sam/transcript/Quick_Guide_for_Grants_Registrations.pdf
9

4. Submission Dates and Times

a. Application Submission Deadline

Applications are due Wednesday, May 6, 2020 by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 

CNCS will not consider applications submitted after the deadline, except as noted in Section 

D.4.c. Late Applications. CNCS reserves the right to extend the submission deadline. CNCS will 

post a notification in the event of an extended deadline on CNCS’s website. 

b. Additional Documents Deadline

Additional documents are due by the application submission deadline. See Sections D.4.a. 

Application Submission Deadline and D.7.b. Submission of Additional Documents for more 

information.

c. Late Applications

All applications received after the submission deadline published in this Notice are presumed to 

be non-compliant. To overcome this presumption, the applicant must:

• submit a written explanation or justification of the extenuating circumstance(s) that 

caused the delay, including: 

 the timing and specific cause(s) of the delay

 the ticket number if a request for assistance was submitted to the National Service 

Hotline

 any information provided to the applicant by the National Service Hotline

 any other documentation or evidence that supports the justification

• ensure that CNCS receives the written explanation or justification and any other evidence 

that substantiates the claimed extenuating circumstance(s), via email to 

LateApplications@cns.gov no later than 24 hours after the application deadline stated in 

the Notice.

Communication with CNCS staff, including an applicant’s program officer/portfolio manager, is 

not a substitute for a written explanation or justification of the extenuating circumstance that 

caused the delay as outlined above. Applicants are required to continue working in eGrants, 

CNCS’s web-based application system and with the National Service Hotline to submit the 

application. CNCS will determine whether or not to accept a late application on a case-by-case 

basis.

Applicants that do not meet the application submission deadline, and do not submit a written 

explanation or justification or any other evidence to overcome the presumption of noncompliance within the published timeframe, will not be reviewed or selected for award.

Please note: CNCS will not consider an advance request to submit a late application. Please 

carefully review and follow the guidance in this section and submit your application as soon as 

possible.
10

5. Intergovernmental Review

This Notice is not subject to Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal 

Programs.” 

6. Funding Restrictions 

a. Award Funding Requirements

1. Member Living Allowance

A living allowance is not considered a salary or a wage. Programs are not required to provide a 

living allowance for members serving in less than full-time terms of service. If a program 

chooses to provide a living allowance to a less than full-time member, it must comply with the 

maximum limits in the table below. For Cost Reimbursement grants, the amount must be 

included in the proposed budget as either CNCS or grantee share. Exceptions are noted below. 

While Fixed Amount grant applicants are not required to submit detailed budgets, they are still 

required to provide a living allowance to members that complies with the minimum and 

maximum requirements. Exceptions are noted below. Fixed Amount grant applicants are not 

required to indicate that amount in the application and should request those positions as “without 

living allowance” in the budget. 

Table: Minimum and Maximum Living Allowance

Service Term Minimum 

# of 

Hours

Minimum 

Living 

Allowance

Maximum Total 

Living Allowance 

Full-time 1,700 $14,279 $28,558

Three Quarter-time 1,200 n/a $20,159

Half-time 900 n/a $15,119

Reduced Half-time 675 n/a $11,339

Quarter-time 450 n/a $7,559

Minimum-time 300 n/a $5,040

Exceptions to the Living Allowance Requirements 

a. Programs existing prior to September 21, 1993 are not required to offer a living allowance. If 

an applicant chooses to offer a living allowance, it is exempt from the minimum requirement, but 

not the maximum requirement.

b. EAP Grantees are not required to provide a living allowance, but if a living allowance is 

provided, it must comply with the maximum requirements set forth in the Living Allowance 

Table above.

c. Professional Corps Grantees must provide members a living allowance or salary, which must 

meet the minimum, but may exceed the maximum living allowance set in the Living Allowance 

Table above. Professional Corps member salaries and benefits including child care are paid 

entirely by the organizations with which the members serve, and are not included in the budget 

request to CNCS (federal or matching share.) 
11

2. Maximum Cost per Member Service Year (MSY) 

The CNCS cost per MSY is determined by dividing the CNCS share of budgeted grant costs by 

the number of MSYs requested. It does not include child care or the value of the education award 

a member may earn. The maximum amount an applicant may request from CNCS per MSY is 

determined on an annual basis. 

New and recompeting applicants will be held to the maximum cost per MSY for their grant type. 

Table: Maximum Cost per MSY

Grant Program Maximum

Indian Tribes (cost reimbursement) $15,479*

Professional Corps Fixed Amount Applicants/Grantees $1,000**

Education Award Program Fixed Amount Grant $800

Full-cost Fixed Amount Grant $15,479

*Cost reimbursement programs operating in rural communities (as defined in the Mandatory 

Supplemental Guidance) and cost reimbursement programs that recruit opportunity youth as 

AmeriCorps members may request up to $15,647 cost per MSY for the AmeriCorps members 

who will be serving in rural areas or who are opportunity youth. At its discretion, CNCS may 

award a grant with a cost per MSY at a higher level than published in this Notice. CNCS will not 

award a grant with a cost per MSY that exceeds $19,500.

 

**CNCS requires Professional Corps programs to cover the operating expenses associated with 

the AmeriCorps program through non CNCS resources. CNCS will only consider operating 

funds of up to $1,000 per MSY if an applicant is able to demonstrate significant organizational 

financial need based on the materials reviewed by the Office of Grant Management/Grant 

Administration.

For purposes of fundamental fairness, CNCS may review an application which meets the 

statutory characteristics of a professional corps as a professional corps, regardless of whether the 

organization applied as a professional corps program. CNCS reserves the right to determine 

whether an applicant (whether or not the applicant has applied as a Professional Corps) has 

sufficiently demonstrated that they cannot effectively operate an AmeriCorps program without 

receiving CNCS operating funds. There may be specific circumstances where CNCS determines 

that a legal applicant has not demonstrated the need for operational grant funds due to other 

funding resources. Where CNCS’s due diligence review of an application shows that the 

applicant has a historically high level of support from non-CNCS sources, and as a result has 

levels of unrestricted funding that is in excess of the requested level of CNCS funding, CNCS 

may choose to not provide operational grant funding.

3. Segal AmeriCorps Education Award

AmeriCorps members who successfully complete a term of service will be eligible for an 

Education Award from the National Service Trust. The amount of the Education Award is linked 

to the value of the Pell Grant. A member has up to seven years after his or her term of service to 
12

use the Education Award. CNCS will provide the updated Education Award amounts at the time 

of grant award. 

4. Cost Sharing or Matching

a. Please see Section C. Eligibility Information 3. Cost Sharing or Matching earlier in the NOFO. 

b. Indirect Costs

Application budgets may include indirect costs. Based on qualifying factors, applicants may 

either use a federally-approved indirect cost rate, a 10 percent de minimis rate of modified total 

direct costs, or may claim certain costs directly, as outlined in 2 CFR § 200.413. States, local 

governments, and Indian Tribes may use previously-approved indirect cost allocation plans. All 

methods must be applied consistently across all federal awards. Applicants that have a federal 

negotiated indirect cost rate or that will be using the 10 percent de minimis rate must enter that 

information in the Organization section in eGrants. However, under section 121(d) of the NCSA 

and CNCS’s regulations at 45 CFR 2521.95 and 2540.110, no more than five percent of award 

funds may be used to recover indirect costs on AmeriCorps grants. 

The instructions for how to enter the organization’s indirect cost rate can be located 

here: eGrants Indirect Cost Rate User Instructions.

Please note: If CNCS serves as the cognizant agency, the applicant must file a request. To file a 

request, send an email to IndirectCostRate@cns.gov.

c. Pre-Award Costs

Pre-award costs, where authorized, are allowed after receiving written approval from the Office 

of Office of Grant Administration. 

7. Other Submission Requirements

a. Electronic Application Submission in eGrants

Applicants must submit applications electronically via eGrants, CNCS’s web-based application 

system. CNCS recommends that applicants create an eGrants account and begin the application 

at least three weeks before the deadline. Applicants should draft the application as a Word 

document, then copy and paste the text into the appropriate eGrants field no later than 10 days 

before the deadline.

The applicant’s authorized representative must be the person who submits the application. The 

authorized representative must use his or her own eGrants account to sign and submit the 

application. A copy of the governing body’s authorization for this official representative to sign 

must be on file in the applicant’s office.

Applicants should contact the National Service Hotline at (800) 942-2677 or via eGrants 

Questions if they have a problem when they create an account, prepare, or submit the 

application. The general public hours for the National Service Hotline are as follows:

• Mon - Fri, 9 am – 7 pm ET (Jan, May, June, July, Aug, Sept)

• Mon - Thu, 9 am – 7 pm ET (Feb, Mar, Apr, Oct, Nov, Dec)
13

Be prepared to provide the application ID, organization’s name, and the competition to which the 

organization is applying. If the issue cannot be resolved by the deadline, applicants must 

continue working with the National Service Hotline to submit via eGrants.

If circumstances make it impossible for an applicant to submit in eGrants, applicants may send a 

paper copy of the application via overnight carrier below. Applicants must include a written 

explanation and any other documentation or evidence that support their inability to submit their 

application electronically. 

Corporation for National and Community Service 

ATTN: Office of Grant Administration (OGA)/AmeriCorps Application 

250 E Street, SW, Suite 300

Washington, DC 20525

Please use a non-U.S. Postal Service carrier to avoid security-related delays. All deadlines and 

requirements in this Notice also apply to paper applications. CNCS does not accept 

applications submitted via fax or email.

b. Submission of Additional Documents 

Applicants are required to submit the following additional documents by the application 

submission deadline:

All applicants

• Evaluation briefs, reports, studies. Please refer to the Evidence Base section and Mandatory 

Supplemental Guidance for detailed instructions by evidence tier. 

Recompeting applications

• Evaluation report, if required. Please see the Evidence Tiers definitions in the Mandatory 

Supplemental Guidance and Section E. Evaluation Plan for further information. 

• Labor union concurrence (if applicable)

• Federal debt delinquency (if applicable)

Entities applying on behalf of a Federally Recognized Tribe (New and recompeting)

• Tribal organization eligibility documentation. (See the Eligible Applicants section.)

New and Recompeting applications

• New and recompeting applicants requesting over $75,000 and All New to CNCS applicants 

regardless of funding level are required to submit a Operational and Financial Management 

Survey and supporting documents located at: www.nationalservice.gov/resources/financialmanagement - select Operational and Financial Management Survey under the Application 

Certification Forms Section.

Failure to submit the required additional documents by the deadline may have a negative effect 

on the assessment of your application and/or on the determination of the application’s eligibility 

to advance for review.
14

Additional documents must be emailed to AdditionalDocuments@cns.gov with the following 

subject line: “Legal Applicant Name” – “Application ID Number.” Emails should include:

• the legal applicant name and its point of contact information

• the application ID number

• a list of documents that are attached to the email

• individually attached files that are clearly labeled, and that include the legal applicant 

name and application ID number within the heading of each document. To ensure that all 

required additional documents are received, please provide each document as an 

individual file. Please do not send all documents as one scanned file.

• If the size of an applicant’s files requires multiple emails, please also include an ordering 

system in the subject line, such as “(1 of 3)”

Do not submit any items that are not requested in this Notice and Guidance. CNCS will not 

review or return them.

CNCS will assess an applicant’s strategic considerations. Applicants must check the relevant 

boxes in the Program Information tab in CNCS’s web-based management system in order to be 

considered for CNCS’s assessment of the strategic considerations (see Selection for Funding

section.) Applicants should only check the boxes if the strategic consideration is a significant and 

intentional part of their program design and if implementation strategies are described in the 

application.

E. APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION

1. Review Criteria

Each applicant must describe a project that will deploy AmeriCorps members effectively to solve 

a significant community problem. CNCS urges applicants to submit high quality applications 

that carefully follow the guidance in this Notice and in the Application Instructions. The quality 

of an application will be an important factor in determining whether an organization will receive 

funding. 

Categories/Subcategories Percentage

Executive Summary 0

Program Design 50

Theory of Change and Logic Model 24

Evidence Tier 12

Evidence Quality 8

Notice Priority 0

Member Experience 6

Organizational Capability 25

Organizational Background and Staffing 9

Compliance and Accountability 8

Culture That Values Learning 4

Member Supervision 4

Cost Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy 25
15

A. Executive Summary (Required - 0 percent)

Please fill in the blanks of these sentences to complete the Executive Summary. Do not deviate 

from the template below.

The [Name of the organization] proposes to have [Number of] AmeriCorps members who 

will [service activities the members will be doing] in [the locations the AmeriCorps members 

will serve]. At the end of the first program year, the AmeriCorps members will be 

responsible for [anticipated outcome of project]. In addition, the AmeriCorps members will 

leverage [number of leveraged volunteers, if applicable] who will be engaged in [what the 

leveraged volunteers will be doing.] 

This program will focus on the CNCS focus area(s) of [Focus Area(s)].* The CNCS 

investment of $[amount of request] will be matched with $[amount of projected match], 

$[amount of local, state, and federal funds] in public funding and $[amount of nongovernmental funds] in private funding. 

*If the program is not operating in a CNCS focus area, omit this sentence. 

Fixed-Amount grant applicants (EAP, Full-cost Fixed, No Cost Slots) should list their Other 

Revenue (see Mandatory Supplemental Guidance) because they are not required to provide a 

specific amount of match, but still raise significant additional resources to operate the program. 

B. Program Design (50 percent)

Reviewers will consider the quality of the application’s response to the criteria below. Do not 

assume all sub-criteria are of equal value. 

1. Theory of Change and Logic Model (24 points)

The Theory of Change shall address: 

• The proposed intervention is responsive to the identified community problem. 

• The applicant’s proposed intervention is clearly articulated including the design, dosage, 

target population, and roles of AmeriCorps members and (if applicable) leveraged 

volunteers.

• The applicant’s intervention is likely to lead to the outcomes identified in the applicant’s 

theory of change. 

• The expected outcomes articulated in the application narrative and logic model represent 

meaningful progress in addressing the community problem identified by the applicant. 

• The rationale for utilizing AmeriCorps members to deliver the intervention(s) is reasonable.

• The service role of AmeriCorps members will produce significant contributions to existing 

efforts to address the stated problem. 

The Logic Model shall depict:

• A summary of the community problem.

• The inputs or resources that are necessary to deliver the intervention, including but not 

limited to:

• Locations or sites in which members will provide services

• Number of AmeriCorps members who will deliver the intervention
16

• The core activities that define the intervention or program model that members will 

implement or deliver, including:

• The duration of the intervention (e.g., the total number of weeks, sessions or months of 

the intervention)

• The dosage of the intervention (e.g., the number of hours per session or sessions per 

week)

• The target population for the intervention (e.g., disconnected youth, third graders at a 

certain reading proficiency level)

• The measurable outputs that result from delivering the intervention (i.e. number of 

beneficiaries served, types and number of activities conducted.) If applicable, identify which 

National Performance Measures will be used as output indicators

• Outcomes that demonstrate changes in knowledge/skill, attitude, behavior, or condition that 

occur as a result of the intervention. If applicable, identify which National Performance 

Measures will be used as outcome indicators.

Note: The logic model is a visual representation of the applicant’s theory of change. Programs 

may include short, medium or long-term outcomes in the logic model. Applicants are not 

required to measure all components of their theory of change. The applicant’s performance 

measures should be consistent with the program’s theory of change and should represent 

significant program activities. 

In the application narrative, applicants should discuss their rationale for setting output and 

outcome targets for their performance measures. 

Rationales and justifications should be informed by the organization’s performance data (e.g., 

program data observed over time that suggests targets are reasonable), relevant research (e.g. 

targets documented by organizations running similar programs with similar populations), or prior 

program evaluation findings.

Applicants with multiple interventions should complete one Logic Model chart which 

incorporates each intervention. Logic model content that exceeds three pages will not be 

reviewed.

2. Evidence Base (20 points)

The assessment of an applicant’s evidence base has two parts. First, the applicant will be 

assigned to an evidence tier (see the Mandatory Supplemental Guidance.) Second, the quality of 

the applicant’s evidence and the degree to which it supports the proposed program design will be 

assessed and scored.

Evidence Tier (12 points):

An evidence tier will be assessed for each applicant for the purpose of understanding the relative 

strength of each applicant’s evidence base and the likelihood that the proposed intervention will 

lead to outcomes identified in the logic model. 

In 2019, the evidence tiers of successful AmeriCorps State and National applicants that were 

competing were as follows: Strong 20%, Moderate 15%, Preliminary 30%, and Pre-Preliminary 
17

35%. As these figures indicate, CNCS values and funds programs at all points along the 

evidence continuum and expects programs to progress along the evidence continuum over time. 

Thus, do not be deterred from applying for funding due to your current evidence level. 

Applicants who have outcome or impact evaluation reports of the same intervention described in 

the application (see Mandatory Supplemental Guidance for a definition of “same intervention”) 

may submit up to 2 of those reports, plus (if applicable) the evaluation report from their last 

three-year grant cycle, to qualify for the Preliminary, Moderate, or Strong evidence tier. In order 

to qualify for consideration, the intervention evaluated in the submitted report(s) must match the

intervention proposed by the applicant in the following areas, all of which must be clearly 

described in the Program Design and Logic Model sections of the application:

• Characteristics of the beneficiary population 

• Characteristics of the population delivering the intervention 

• Dosage (frequency, duration) and design of the intervention, including all key 

components and activities

• The context in which the intervention is delivered 

• Outcomes of the intervention

Submitted reports that do not sufficiently match the intervention proposed by the applicant in all 

of these areas will not be considered applicable and will not be reviewed or receive any points. 

Submission of additional documents that are not consistent with the guidance and requirements 

described in the Notice (e.g., advocacy pieces, policy briefs, other narratives that are not research 

studies or program evaluations) will not be reviewed.

In the Evidence Tier section of the application narrative, applicants must (1) summarize the 

study design and key findings of any outcome or impact evaluation report(s) submitted and (2) 

describe any other evidence that supports their program, including past performance measure 

data and/or other research studies that inform their program design. Applicants who submit 

evaluation reports for consideration must also describe in the Evidence Base section of the 

application narrative how the intervention described in the submitted reports is the same as the 

intervention described in the application (see Mandatory Supplemental Guidance). 

Applicants should provide citations for the studies they describe, if applicable; however, 

reviewers will not review any documents external to the application other than evaluation 

report(s) submitted in accordance with the Notice instructions.

Applicants must meet all requirements of an evidence tier in order to be considered for that tier. 

If the evaluation reports submitted by the applicant do not meet the definitions in the Mandatory 

Supplemental Guidance, the applicant may be considered for a lower evidence tier. 

Evidence Quality (8 points)

After the applicant’s evidence tier has been assessed, the quality of the applicant’s evidence and 

the extent to which it supports the proposed program design will be assessed and scored. 
18

For applicants who are assessed as being in the Preliminary, Moderate, or Strong evidence tiers, 

reviewers will score the submitted evaluation reports using the following standards:

• The submitted reports are of satisfactory methodological quality and rigor for the type of 

evaluation conducted (e.g., adequate sample size and statistical power, internal and/or 

external validity, appropriate use of control or comparison groups, etc.); 

• The submitted reports describe evaluations that were conducted relatively recently, 

preferably within the last six years;

• The submitted reports show a meaningful and significant positive effect on program 

beneficiaries in at least one key outcome of interest.

For applicants who are assessed as being in the Pre-Preliminary evidence tier, reviewers will 

score the narrative provided in the Evidence Base section of the application using the following 

standards:

• The applicant uses relevant evidence, including past performance measure data and/or 

cited research studies, to inform their proposed program design;

• The described evidence is relatively recent, preferably from the last six years;

• The evidence described by the applicant indicates a meaningful positive effect on 

program beneficiaries in at least one key outcome of interest.

All applicants, including new grantees, are required to provide additional information in the 

Evaluation Summary or Plan field of the application (See Section E. Evaluation Plan); however, 

information provided in the Evaluation Summary or Plan field will not be scored and will not be 

reviewed until after funding decisions have been made.

3. Notice Priority (0 points)

• The applicant proposed program fits within one or more of the AmeriCorps funding priorities 

as outlined in the Funding Priorities section and more fully described in the Mandatory 

Supplemental Guidance and the proposed program meets all of the requirements detailed in 

the Funding Priorities section and in the Mandatory Supplemental Guidance.

4. Member Experience (6 points)

• AmeriCorps members will gain skills as a result of their training and service that can be 

utilized and will be valued by future employers after their service term is completed.

• The program will recruit AmeriCorps members from the geographic or demographic 

communities in which the programs operate. 

• The applicant will foster an inclusive service culture where different backgrounds, talents, 

and capabilities are welcomed and leveraged for learning and effective service delivery.

C. Organizational Capability (25 percent)

Reviewers will consider the quality of the application’s response to the following criteria below. 

Do not assume all sub-criteria are of equal value.

1. Organizational Background and Staffing (9 points)

• The organization details the roles, responsibilities, and structure of the staff that will be 

implementing the AmeriCorps program as well as providing oversight and monitoring for the 

program. 
19

2. Compliance and Accountability (8 points)

• The organization has a monitoring and oversight plan to prevent and detect non-compliance 

and enforce compliance with AmeriCorps rules and regulations including those related to 

prohibited and unallowable activities and criminal history checks at the grantee, subgrantee 

(if applicable), and service site locations.

• The CNCS-required evaluation report meets CNCS requirements (if applicable).

• The CNCS-required evaluation report is of satisfactory quality (if applicable).

3. Culture that Values Learning (4 points)

• The applicant's board, management, and staff collect and use information, including 

performance data, for learning and decision making.

4. Member Supervision (4 points)

• AmeriCorps members will receive sufficient guidance and support from their supervisor to 

provide effective service.

• AmeriCorps supervisors will be adequately trained/prepared to follow AmeriCorps and 

program regulations, priorities, and expectations.

D. Cost Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy (25 percent)

Reviewers will assess the quality of the application’s budget to the following criteria below. Do 

not assume all sub-criteria are of equal value.

This criteria will be assessed based on the budget submitted. No narrative should be 

entered in the narrative box except for “See budget”

1. Cost Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy (25 points)

• Budget is submitted without mathematical errors and proposed costs are allowable, 

reasonable, and allocable to the award.

• Budget is submitted with adequate information to assess how each line item is calculated.

• Budget is in compliance with the budget instructions.

• Match is submitted with adequate information to support the amount written in the budget.

• The budgeted match is equal to or more than the required match for the given program year.

• The cost per MSY is equal to or less than the maximum cost per MSY. 

Proposed budgets that contain MSY costs that exceed the maximum cost per MSY and/or less 

than required match will be considered unresponsive to the application criteria.

Applicants must complete the budget and ensure the following information is in the budget 

screens:

• Current indirect rate cost rate information if used to claim indirect/administrative costs.

• Identify the non-CNCS funding and resources necessary to support the project, including for 

Fixed Amount applicants.

• Indicate the amount of non-CNCS resource commitments, type of commitments (in-kind 

and/or cash), the sources of these commitments, and if the commitments are proposed or 

secured.
20

E. Evaluation Plan (Required for recompeting grantees - 0 percent)

If the applicant is competing for the first time, please provide a data collection plan in the 

“Evaluation Summary or Plan” field that includes the following:

• A description of the applicant’s data collection system and how it is sufficient to collect high 

quality performance measurement data during the first three years of the grant. If the 

applicant does not yet have a data collection system, describe the plan and timeline for 

developing a high quality system.

• A description of how the applicant will use performance data (including CNCS performance 

measures and other process and outcome measures if applicable) to improve its program in 

the first three years of funding.

First-time applicants should be aware that CNCS may require submission of data collection 

instruments if a grant is approved for funding. For more information about how to develop a 

high-quality data collection plan, visit the CNCS Knowledge Network.

www.nationalservice.gov/resources/americorps/building-effective-data-collection-planspresented-october-12-2017

If the applicant is recompeting for AmeriCorps funds for the first time (see definition of 

“recompeting” below) the program must submit its evaluation plan in the “Evaluation Summary 

or Plan” section of the Narratives field in CNCS’s web-based management system. If the 

applicant is recompeting for a subsequent time, the program must submit its evaluation report as 

an attachment (see the Submission of Additional Documents section for more information), and 

must also submit an evaluation plan for the next three-year period in the “Evaluation Summary 

or Plan” field in the system. Evaluations plans submitted outside of the system will not be 

reviewed. 

Evaluation plans must include as much information as possible for each of the following (see 

Frequently Asked Questions: Evaluation, available at 

http://www.nationalservice.gov/resources/evaluation/cncs-evaluation-policies):

• A short description of the theory of change - why the proposed intervention is expected to 

produce the proposed results

• Outcome(s) of interest - clear and measurable outcomes that are aligned with the theory of 

change and will be assessed during the evaluation

• Research questions to be addressed by the study - concrete research questions (or 

hypotheses) that are clearly connected to the outcomes

• Proposed research design for the evaluation including a rationale for the design selected, an 

assessment of its strengths and limitations, and a description of the main components; 

• Description of the data sources, sampling methods, measurement tools, and data collection 

procedures that will be used in the evaluation 

• Analysis plan that clearly describes the methodology/ies that will be used to analyze the 

collected data

• A timeline for the evaluation that describes how the evaluation will cover at least one year of 

CNCS-funded activity and will be completed within the three-year timeframe of the grant

• Qualifications needed for the evaluator

• The proposed budget
21

Information provided in the Evaluation Summary or Plan field will not be scored and will not be 

reviewed until after funding decisions have been made.

For more information about evaluation plans visit the CNCS Knowledge Network’s Evaluation 

Resources: http://www.nationalservice.gov/resources/evaluation/planning-evaluation.

The evaluation requirements differ depending on the amount of the grant, as described in 45 CFR 

§2522.700-710:

• If the applicant is a State/Territory subgrantee and/or National Direct Grantee (other than an 

Education Award Program grantee), and its average annual CNCS program grant is $500,000 

or more, it must arrange for an external impact evaluation of the program (see Mandatory 

Supplemental Guidance), and it must submit the evaluation with any subsequent application 

to CNCS for competitive funds as required in 45 CFR §2522.730.

• If the applicant is a State/Territory subgrantee and/or National Direct Grantee whose average 

annual CNCS program grant is less than $500,000, or an Education Award Program Grantee, 

it must conduct an internal or an external evaluation of the program, and it must submit the 

evaluation with any subsequent application to CNCS for competitive funds as required in 45 

CFR §2522.730.

For purposes of compliance with evaluation plan and report requirements, an application will be 

considered a recompeting application if it satisfies the CNCS definition of “same project” (see

Mandatory Supplemental Guidance) and has been funded competitively for at least three years.

• If the applicant has received competitive funding for the same project for at least three 

years, it will be required to submit an evaluation plan. 

• If the applicant has received at least six years of competitive funding for the same project, 

the applicant will be required to submit an evaluation report as well as an evaluation plan 

for the upcoming 3-year grant. If the applicant does not satisfy the definition of 

recompeting, it will not be required to submit an evaluation plan or completed evaluation 

report.

The “Evaluation Summary or Plan” field of the Narrative does not count toward the page limit of 

the application; however, it does have a set character limit of 20,000 characters. 

State/Territory subgrantees and/or National Direct Grantees that are recompeting for funds may 

be eligible to apply for approval of an alternative evaluation approach. Grantees requesting 

approval of an alternative evaluation approach should submit a request for approval of an 

alternative evaluation approach along with their evaluation plan in the Evaluation Summary or 

Plan field in the system. The request should clearly explain: (a) the evaluation constraints faced 

by the program, (b) why the proposed approach is the most rigorous option feasible, and (c) how 

the proposed alternative approach will help the grantee build their evidence base. Evaluation 

plans should include, at a minimum, the required elements listed in this Notice. The evaluation 

plan must be consistent with the information submitted in the competitive funding application 

and in the request for approval of an alternative evaluation approach. CNCS guidance on 

alternative evaluation approaches can be found on the CNCS website.
22

If the request for the alternative evaluation approach plus the Evaluation Plan itself will exceed 

the character limit of the Evaluation Summary or Plan field in the system, the applicant should 

do the following:

• Enter the Evaluation Plan in the Evaluation Summary or Plan field in the system.

• Include a note in the Evaluation Summary or Plan field stating that the applicant is requesting 

an alternative evaluation approach.

• Include the alternative evaluation approach at the END of the application narrative with the 

heading “REQUEST FOR ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION APPROACH.” This section of 

the application narrative will not count against the page limit.

F. Amendment Justification (0 percent)

Enter N/A. This field will be used if the applicant is awarded a grant and needs to amend it. 

G. Clarification Information (0 percent)

Enter N/A. This field will be used to enter information that requires clarification in the postreview period. 

H. Continuation Changes (0 percent)

Enter N/A. This field will be used to enter changes in the application narratives in continuation 

requests.

Criteria for Planning Grants

Categories/Subcategories Percentage

Executive Summary 0

Program Design 50

Problem/Need 20

Planning Process/Timeline 30

Organizational Capability 25

Organizational Background and Staffing 25

Cost Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy 25

A. Executive Summary (Required - 0 percent)

Please fill in the blanks of these sentences to complete the Executive Summary. Do not deviate 

from the template below.

The [Name of the organization] proposes a planning grant to ultimately have [Number of] 

AmeriCorps members who will [service activities the members will be doing] in [the 

locations the AmeriCorps members will serve]. At the end of the first program year, the 

AmeriCorps members will be responsible for [anticipated outcome of project]. In addition, 

the AmeriCorps members will leverage [number of leveraged volunteers, if applicable] who 

will be engaged in [what the leveraged volunteers will be doing.] 

This program will focus on the CNCS focus area(s) of [Focus Area(s)].* The CNCS 

investment of $[amount of request] will be matched with $[amount of projected match], 

$[amount of local, state, and federal funds] in public funding and $[amount of nongovernmental funds] in private funding. 
23

*If the program is not operating in a CNCS focus area, omit this sentence. 

B. Program Design (50 percent)

Reviewers will consider the quality of the application’s response to the criteria below. Do not 

assume all sub-criteria are of equal value. 

1. Problem/Need (20 points):

• The problem is prevalent and severe in communities where the program plans to serve and 

has been documented with relevant data. 

• The applicant provides a clear explanation for why a planning grant is needed.

2. Planning Process/Timeline (30 points):

• The applicant describes a clear and logical planning process, including: 

o A detailed description of who is leading the planning process. 

o A clear description of how the planning period will be used to develop the necessary 

components to effectively manage an AmeriCorps program in the future. 

• The planning timeline includes development of the following program elements:

o Theory of Change/Logic Model

o Intervention and evidence base

o Member training and supervision plans

o Commitment to AmeriCorps Identity

o Program Compliance and Accountability

o Securing Match Support for the Program

C. Organizational Capability (25 percent)

Reviewers will consider the quality of the application’s response to the following criteria below. 

1. Organizational Background and Staffing(25 points)

• The applicant describes how it has the experience, staffing, and management structure to plan 

the proposed program.

• The applicant describes its prior experience in the proposed area of programming (if any). 

• The applicant describes its plans to engage community members and partner organizations in 

the planning process.
24

D. Cost Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy (25 percent)

Reviewers will assess the quality of the application’s budget to the following criteria below. Do 

not assume all sub-criteria are of equal value.

This criteria will be assessed based on the budget submitted. No narrative should be 

entered in the narrative box except for “See budget”

1. Cost Effectiveness and Budget Adequacy (25 points)

• Budget is submitted without mathematical errors and proposed costs are allowable, 

reasonable, and allocable to the award.

• Budget is submitted with adequate information to assess how each line item is calculated.

• Budget is in compliance with the budget instructions.

• Match is submitted with adequate information to support the amount written in the budget.

• The budgeted match is equal to or more than the required match for the given program year.

Applicants must complete the budget and ensure the following information is in the budget 

screens:

• Current indirect rate cost rate information if used to claim indirect/administrative costs.

• Identify the non-CNCS funding and resources necessary to support the project, including for 

Fixed Amount applicants.

• Indicate the amount of non-CNCS resource commitments, type of commitments (in-kind 

and/or cash), the sources of these commitments, and if the commitments are proposed or 

secured.

E. Evaluation Plan (0 percent)

Planning applicants should enter “N/A” in this section.

2. Review and Selection Process

CNCS will engage External and Staff Reviewers with relevant knowledge and expertise to assess 

and provide input on the eligible applications. The review and selection process is intended to 

produce a diversified set of high-quality programs that represent the priorities and strategic 

considerations described in this Notice. The determinations made by CNCS reviewers may be 

different than what the applicant self-determined upon submission of its application.

The stages of the review and selection process follow:

a. Compliance and Eligibility Review

CNCS will conduct a Compliance Review to determine if an application meets the compliance 

requirements published in this Notice and advances to the next stage of the review process. 

An application is compliant if the applicant: 

• is an eligible organization

• submitted an application by the submission deadline
25

Reviewing for eligibility is intended to ensure that only those applications that are eligible for 

award are further reviewed. However, determinations of eligibility can take place at any point 

during the application review and selection process. Applicants that are determined to be 

ineligible will not receive an award.

b. Application Review 

External Review 

External Reviewers will review and assess the evidence criteria in the Notice. CNCS will recruit 

and select reviewers on the basis of demonstrated expertise. All External Reviewers will be 

screened for conflicts of interest.

Internal Review

CNCS staff will evaluate the applications using the application review criteria and assess the 

priorities and strategic considerations detailed in the Notice. Reviewers will be screened for 

conflicts of interest. 

Post-Review Quality Control

After the initial review process is complete, CNCS staff will review the results for fairness and 

consistency. Some applications may be selected for a Quality Control assessment. This 

additional level of review may be used to assess applications for which there are significant 

reviewer anomalies. 

c. Applicant Clarification

CNCS may ask an applicant for clarifying information. CNCS staff will use this information to

make funding recommendations. A request for clarification does not guarantee an award.

Applicants may be recommended for funding even if they are not asked for clarifying 

information. An applicant’s failure to respond to a request for clarification adequately and in a 

timely manner may result in the removal of its application from consideration.

d. Risk Assessment

CNCS staff will evaluate the risks to the program posed by each applicant, including conducting 

due diligence to ensure an applicant’s ability to manage federal funds. This evaluation is in 

addition to the assessment of the applicant’s eligibility and the quality of its application on the 

basis of the Selection Criteria. Results from this evaluation will inform funding decisions. If 

CNCS determines that an award will be made to an applicant with assessed risks, special 

conditions that correspond to the degree of assessed risk may be applied to the award. 

Additionally, if CNCS concludes that the reasons for applicants having poor risk assessment are 

not likely to be mitigated, those applications may not be selected for funding. 

In evaluating risks, CNCS may consider some of the following criteria: 

• financial stability

• financial capability and capacity to manage Federal funds

• quality of management systems and ability to meet the management standards prescribed 

in applicable OMB Guidance

• applicant’s record in managing previous CNCS awards, cooperative agreements, or 

procurement awards, including: 
26

o timeliness of compliance with applicable reporting requirements

o accuracy of data reported

o validity of performance measure data reported

o conformance to the terms and conditions of the previous federal awards 

o meeting matching requirements

o the extent to which any previously awarded amounts will be expended prior to 

future awards

• information available through OMB-designated repositories of government-wide 

eligibility qualification or financial integrity information, such as:

o Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)

o U.S. Treasury Bureau of Fiscal Services

o Dun and Bradstreet

o SAM, and/or

o “Do Not Pay” 

• reports and findings from single audits performed under Uniform Administrative 

Guidance and finding of any other available audits or investigations

• IRS Tax Form 990

• applicant organization’s annual report

• publicly available information, including information from the applicant organization's 

website

• responses to the Operational and Financial Management Survey and supporting 

documentation

• amount of funding requested by the organization. 

In evaluating programmatic performance, CNCS may consider the following for applicants that 

are current formula and competitive grantees: 

• Grant progress reports – attainment of Performance Measures

• Enrollment and retention

• Compliance with 5 day enrollment and 30 day exit requirements in the AmeriCorps portal

• Monitoring findings - CNCS and/or OIG (if applicable).

Additionally, CNCS may use the results of the review of the risk assessment evaluation in 

determining which applications to fund. If CNCS concludes that the reasons for applicants 

having poor risk assessment evaluations are not likely to be mitigated, those applications may 

not be selected for funding. 

e. Consideration of Integrity and Performance System Information

Prior to making any award that exceeds $150,000, CNCS is required to review and consider any 

information about the applicant that is in the designated integrity and performance system 

accessible through SAM and FAPIIS (see 41 U.S.C. 2313). Additionally, CNCS may expand 

upon these requirements and use its discretion to review and consider information about any 

applicant receiving an award, including those under $150,000.

Any applicant, at its option, may review information in the designated integrity and performance 

systems accessible through FAPIIS and comment on any information about itself that a federal 
27

awarding agency previously entered and is currently in the designated integrity and performance 

system accessible through FAPIIS.

CNCS may consider comments by any applicant, in addition to the other information in the 

designated integrity and performance system, in making a judgment about the applicant's 

integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing its 

review of risk posed by the applicant under the Risk Assessment Evaluation section of this

Notice. 

f. Selection for Funding

The review and selection process is designed to: 

• identify how well eligible applications are aligned with the application review criteria

• CNCS Notice Priorities representation

• build a diversified portfolio based on the following strategic considerations: 

o CNCS Funding Priorities (See Section A.2. Funding Priorities)

o meaningful representation of 

 geographic diversity 

 rural communities

 faith-based organizations

 focus area representation.

Based on the evaluation of these strategic considerations, applications may be selected for 

funding over applications with a greater degree of alignment with the review criteria. In selecting 

applicants to receive awards under this Notice, the Chief Executive Officer will endeavor to 

include a diverse portfolio of applications based on staff recommendations and strategic 

considerations.

CNCS reserves the right to prioritize funding existing awards over making new awards. 

CNCS reserves the right to award applications in an amount other than at the requested level of 

funding and will document the rationale for doing so. 

CNCS reserves the right to adjust or make changes to the review process, if unforeseen 

challenges or urgent circumstances make it impossible, impracticable, or inefficient to conduct

the review process as planned. Any such adjustments or changes will not affect the selection 

criteria that will be used to assess applications.

3. Feedback to Applicants

Following awards, applicants will receive summary comments from the External Review and 

Staff Review of their compliant applications. This feedback will be based on the review of the 

original application and will not reflect information provided during clarification.

4. Transparency in Grant-making

CNCS is committed to transparency in grant-making. The following information for new and recompeting applications will be published on CNCS Results of Grant Competitions within 90 

business days after all grants are awarded:
28

• a list of all compliant applications submitted

• executive summaries of all compliant applications

• data extracted from the SF-424 Face Sheet 

• a blank template of the external review worksheet

• a list of all external reviewers who completed the review process

• a summary of external reviewer comments for successful applications.

Submitted program narratives for successful applications will be available upon request. 

F. FEDERAL AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION

1. Federal Award Notices

CNCS will make awards following the grant selection announcement. CNCS anticipates 

announcing the results of this competition by July 6, 2020. All applicants, successful or not, will 

be notified of funding decisions via email.

Notification of an award is not an authorization to begin grant activities. The Notice of Grant 

Award issued by the Office of Grant Administration is the authorizing document for grant

activities. An awardee may not expend federal funds until the start of the Project Period 

identified on the Notice of Grant Award.

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

a. Uniform Guidance

All awards made under this Notice will be subject to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, 

Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) in 2 CFR Parts 

200 and 2205.

b. Requests for Improper Payment Information

CNCS may, from time to time, request documentation from recipients in order to monitor the 

award or to comply with other legal requirements, such as the Improper Payments Information 

Act of 2002, as amended. Failure to make timely responses to these requests may result in award 

funds being placed on temporary manual hold, reimbursement only status, or other remedies may 

be applied as appropriate. 

c. CNCS Terms and Conditions 

All awards made under this Notice will be subject to the FY 2020 CNCS General Terms and 

Conditions, and the FY 2020 AmeriCorps Program Specific Terms and Conditions for the 

particular program (when applicable). These Terms and Conditions contain detailed, mandatory 

compliance and reporting requirements. Current versions of the CNCS General and Program 

Specific Terms and Conditions for each of its programs is available at 

www.nationalservice.gov/resources/terms-and-conditions-cncs-grants. 

d. National Service Criminal History Check Requirements

The National Service Criminal History Check (NSCHC) is a specific screening procedure 

established by law to protect the beneficiaries of national service. The law requires grantees to 
29

conduct and document NSCHCs on persons (including award-funded staff, national service 

participant, or volunteer) receiving a salary, living allowance, stipend, or education award 

through a program receiving CNCS funds. This includes staff that receive part of their salary 

through a subgrant. An individual is ineligible to serve in a position that receives such CNCS 

funding if the individual is registered, or required to be registered, as a sex offender or has been 

convicted of murder. The cost of conducting NSCHCs is an allowable expense under the award.

Grantees should utilize the two vendors CNCS has engaged to conduct the required NSCHCs. 

Failure to conduct an NSCHC may result in significant disallowed costs.

Unless CNCS has provided a grant recipient with a written exemption or written approval of an 

alternative search procedure, recipients must perform the following checks:

All award-funded staff, national service participants, and volunteers must undergo NSCHCs that 

include:

• A nationwide name-based search of the National Sex Offender Public Website 

(NSOPW); and

• Either

o A name- or finger-based search of the statewide criminal history registry in the 

person’s state of residence and in the state where the person will serve/work or

o A fingerprint-based FBI criminal history check.

Special Rule for Persons Serving Vulnerable Populations. Award-funded staff, national service 

participants, and volunteers with recurring access to vulnerable populations (i.e., children age 17 

or younger, individuals age 60 or older, or individuals with disabilities) must undergo NSCHCs 

that include:

• A nationwide name-based check of the NSOPW; and 

• Both 

o A name- or fingerprint-based search of the statewide criminal history registry in 

the person’s state of residence and in the state where the person will serve/work; 

and

o A fingerprint-based FBI criminal history check.

See 45 CFR § 2540.200–§ 2540.207 and CNCS Criminal History Check Resources for complete 

information and FAQs.

3. Use of Material

To ensure that materials generated with CNCS funding are available to the public and readily 

accessible to recipients and non-recipients, CNCS reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and 

irrevocable right to obtain, use, modify, reproduce, publish, or disseminate publications and 

materials produced under the award, including data, and to authorize others to do so (2 CFR 

§200.315).

4. Reporting

Recipients are required to submit a variety of reports which are due at specific times during the 

life cycle of an award. All reports must be accurate, complete, and submitted on time.
30

Cost reimbursement grantees are required to provide annual and final progress reports, semiannual financial reports, and an internal or external evaluation report as required by the 

AmeriCorps regulations 45 CFR §§2522.500-2522.540 and §§2522.700-2522.740. Final 

financial and progress reports are due 90 days after the end of the agreement. 

Fixed Amount grantees are required to provide annual and final progress reports and an internal

or external evaluation report. 

Planning grantees are required to provide a final progress report.

All grantees, including Fixed Amount grantees, submit quarterly financial reports to the U.S. 

Department of Health and Human Services Payment Management System.

Award recipients will be required to report at www.FSRS.gov on all subawards over 

$25,000, and may be required to report on executive compensation for the recipient organization 

and its subrecipients. Recipients must have the necessary systems in place to collect and report 

this information. See 2 CFR Part 170 for more information and to determine how these 

requirements apply. 

Once the grant is awarded, recipients will be expected to have data collection and data 

management policies, processes, and practices that provide reasonable assurance that they are 

reporting high quality performance measure data. At a minimum, recipients should have policies, 

processes, and practices that address the following five aspects of data quality for themselves and 

for subrecipients (if applicable):

• the data measures what it intends to measure

• the data reported is complete

• the recipient collects data in a consistent manner

• the recipient takes steps to correct data errors

• the recipient actively reviews data for accuracy prior to submission. 

In addition to annual reporting of progress toward the grant’s approved performance measure 

outputs and outcomes, additional demographic and narrative data must be reported annually (as 

applicable), including the number of applicants for AmeriCorps positions and the number of 

volunteers recruited and/or supported by AmeriCorps members. The full list of required and 

optional demographic indicators for AmeriCorps programs can be found on the AmeriCorps 

Grantee Progress Report webpage.

Failure to submit accurate, complete, and timely required reports may affect the recipient’s 

ability to secure future CNCS funding.

5. Continuation Funding Information and Requirements 

Organizations that have current awards that continue beyond FY 2020 must submit an 

application in order to be eligible to receive funding for the following year. Please see the 

Application Instructions, if applicable. Requests by existing continuation applicants for increases 

in the level of funding or number of positions will be assessed using the review criteria published 

in this Notice.
31

CNCS reserves the right to award applications in an amount other than at the requested level of 

funding and will document the rationale for doing so. 

G. FEDERAL AWARDING AGENCY CONTACTS

For more information or a printed copy of related material(s), email americorpsgrants@cns.gov.

CNCS offers live text chat at www.NationalService.gov/contact-us.

For technical questions and problems with the eGrants system, call the National Service Hotline 

at (800) 942-2677. The general public hours for the National Service Hotline are as follows:

• Mon - Fri, 9 am – 7 pm ET (Jan, May, June, July, Aug, Sept)

• Mon - Thu, 9 am – 7 pm ET (Feb, Mar, Apr, Oct, Nov, Dec)

Potential applicants can also use this link: eGrants Questions. Be prepared to provide the 

application ID, organization’s name, and the name of the Notice to which the organization is 

applying.

H. OTHER INFORMATION

1. Technical Assistance

CNCS will host technical assistance calls to answer questions about the funding opportunity and 

eGrants. CNCS strongly encourages all applicants to participate in these sessions. The schedule 

and call-in information for the technical assistance calls is on CNCS’s website: 

www.nationalservice.gov/build-your-capacity/grants/funding-opportunities.

2. Re-Focusing of Funding

CNCS reserves the right to re-focus program dollars for this competition in the event of disaster 

or other compelling needs. 

I. IMPORTANT NOTICES

Public Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for collection of information under this 

Notice of Funding is estimated to average six hours per submission, including reviewing 

instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing the application and 

reporting forms. CNCS informs people who may respond to this Notice of Funding that they are 

not required to respond unless the OMB control number and expiration date are current valid. 

(See 5 C.F.R. 1320.5(b)(2)(i).) The OMB Control Number for the information collection is 3045-

0187. It expires on 9/30/2020.

Privacy Act Statement: The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C § 552a) requires that we notify you 

that the information requested under this Notice of Funding is collected pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

12592 and 12615 of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 as amended, and 42 

U.S.C. 4953 of the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973 as amended. Purposes and Uses -

The information requested is collected for the purposes of reviewing grant applications and 

granting funding requests. Routine uses may include disclosure of the information to federal, 

state, or local agencies pursuant to lawfully authorized requests. In some programs, the 
32

information may also be provided to federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to 

determine the existence of any prior criminal convictions. The information may also be provided 

to appropriate federal agencies and contractors that have a need to know the information for the 

purpose of assisting the government to respond to a suspected or confirmed breach of the 

security or confidentiality or information maintained in this system of records, and the 

information disclosed is relevant and unnecessary for the assistance. Effects of Nondisclosure -

The information requested is voluntary; however, to be a recipient of this grant program, 

disclosure of personal or sensitive information is required to receive federal benefits.