UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23324-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

ROBIN LANDAU, 

ERIC LANDAU,

CHERI OQUIST, and 

JEFFREY DETWILER,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

JOHN LEFKUS, 

Defendant.

_______________________/ 

ORDER DIRECTING COMPLETION OF FACT INFORMATION SHEET

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Robin Landau, Eric Landau, Cheri 

Oquist, and Jeffrey Detwiler’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Order Directing Completion of Fact 

Information Sheet in Aid of Execution, ECF No. [27], filed on May 23, 2023. Defendant John 

Lefkus (“Defendant”) filed a Response, ECF No. [28], to which Plaintiffs filed a Reply. ECF No. 

[29].1 The Court has carefully considered the Motion, the Response, the Reply, the record in the 

case, the applicable law, and is otherwise fully advised. For the reasons explained below, the 

Motion is granted. 

Plaintiffs hold final judgments against Defendant for $331,728.86 (Jeffrey Detwiler), 

$472,668.56 (Robin and Eric Landau), and $368,470.56 (Cheri Oquist), plus pre-judgment and 

post-judgment interest. ECF No. [26]. In their effort to collect on those final judgments, Plaintiffs 

move under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.560(b) for an Order directing Defendant to complete 

the Fact Information Sheet, Form 1.977. ECF No. [27]. 

1

 Plaintiffs filed an additional Reply, ECF No. [30], which appears to be duplicative of ECF No. [29]. 

Case 1:22-cv-23324-BB Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2023 Page 1 of 3
Case No. 22-cv-23324-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2

In response, Defendant asserts that he and Plaintiffs are engaged in settlement discussions 

that will potentially resolve this case and other cases. ECF No. [28]. Defendant requests that the 

Court “reserve ruling on the Motion and instead require the parties to submit a Joint Status Report 

to the Court in thirty (30) days to advise the Court of the status of the Parties’ negotiations.” Id. at 

2. 

In reply, Plaintiffs accurately point out that Defendant does not contest Plaintiffs’

entitlement to the relief sought in their Motion. ECF No. [29] at 1. They also argue that granting 

the Motion will not impair the parties’ settlement negotiations because Defendant will have 45 

days to fill out the Fact Information Sheet.

The plain language of Rule 1.560(b) states that “the court, at the request of the judgment 

creditor, shall order the judgment debtor or debtors to complete form 1.977, including all required

attachments, within 45 days of the order or such other reasonable time as determined by the court.” 

Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.560(b). “[W]hen the word shall can reasonably be read as mandatory, it ought to 

be so read.” United States v. Williams, 5 F.4th 1295, 1307 (11th Cir. 2021) (quotation marks 

omitted). The Court reads “shall” within Rule 1.560(b) as mandatory. Moreover, to the extent that 

the Court has discretion to deny the post-judgment discovery sought by Plaintiffs, the Court agrees 

with Plaintiffs that the parties’ settlement discussion is no reason to impede Plaintiffs’ efforts to 

collect the valid judgments entered against Defendant. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, no later than 45 days from the 

date of this Order, Defendant shall complete Form 1.977 and provide it to Plaintiffs’ counsel.

Case 1:22-cv-23324-BB Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2023 Page 2 of 3
Case No. 22-cv-23324-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

3

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on June 20, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23324-BB Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2023 Page 3 of 3