# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15

- 931 V

Filed: May 20, 2016

U npublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * HANS VARBLOW

, *

* Petitioner, *

v. *

* Attorney s’ Fees and Costs;

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES

, *

* Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Scott W. Rooney, Nemes Rooney, P.C., Farmington Hills, MI

, for petitioner. Amy P. Kokot , U .S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY S’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On August 26, 2015

, p etitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that due to his receipt of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 27, 2013, he suffered a left shoulder injury. On March 31, 2016

, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on the respondent’s proffer

. (ECF No. 25 ).

On May 20, 2016

, petitioner filed an unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF No. 30 ). 3 Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $ 5,550.00

,

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

3 In the motion, petitioner states that respondent has no objection to petitioner’s request.2 and attorneys’ costs in the amount of $ 1,598.90

, for a total amount of $ 7,148.90

. Id. at

2

. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner

incurred $ 280.00 i n out

- of

- pocket expenses

. Id.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request and the lack of opposition from respondent , the undersigned GRANTS petitioner’s mo tion for attorneys’ fees and

costs.

Accordingly , the undersigned awards the total of $ 7,428.90 4 as follows:

A lump sum of $ 7,148.90 , representing reimbursement for attorneys’ fees and costs, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel, Scott W. Rooney , Nemes Rooney, P.C. ; and

A lump sum of $ 280.00 , representing reimbursement for petitioner’s costs, in the form of a check payable to petitioner , Hans Varblow

.

T he clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

4 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would

be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.

, 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

5 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.