alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5579

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise certain standards that

are required for petitions under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 2000

Mr. MICA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise certain

standards that are required for petitions under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vaccine Injury Com5 pensation Program Improvement Act of 2000’’.
2

•HR 5579 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF CERTAIN STANDARDS FOR PETITIONS

2 UNDER NATIONAL VACCINE INJURY COM3 PENSATION PROGRAM.

4 Section 2111(c)(1)(C) of the Public Health Service

5 Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa–11(c)(1)(C)) is amended by amend6 ing clause (ii) to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(ii)(I) sustained, or had significantly ag8 gravated, any illness, disability, injury, or con9 dition in positive association with a vaccine re10 ferred to in subparagraph (A), but for an ill11 ness, disability, injury, or condition not set

12 forth in the Vaccine Injury Table, or

13 ‘‘(II) sustained, or had significantly aggra14 vated, any illness, disability, injury, or condition

15 set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table in positive

16 association with a vaccine referred to in sub17 paragraph (A) the first symptom or manifesta18 tion of the onset or significant aggravation of

19 which did not occur within the time period set

20 forth in the Table,’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Hiroaki Nishio COMPLAINANT


### v. Commonwealth Ports Anthority RESPONDENT. Docket No. 16-13-03

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-AssistedAirport EnforcementProceedings, 14 CPRPart 16 (Rules ofPractice). Pursuant to the Rules ofPractice, 

### §16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before April3, 2015

.



# . L· 

# /QJ (' Director, Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

# I1

1 ' [ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on \; 

### f\YLU 1 1( , 2015, I placed in the United States mail (first class, postage paid), a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime addressed to:

Hiroaki Nishio P.O. Box 5910 CHRB Saipan, MP 96950 Complainant Maryann Q. Lizama Acting Executive Director Commonwealth Ports Authority Saipan International Airport P.O. Box 501055 Saipan, MP 96950-1055 Respondent Robert Tenorio Torres Attorney at Law P.O. Box 503758 CK Saipan, MP 96950 Counsel to the Respondent Copyto: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 

# /},/ , l I (, ' y' / 

# l )Jtt"VL 

# '/l /---- Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 548

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for a just apportionment

of Representatives in Congress for all States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. FROST, Mr. CLYBURN, Ms.

ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. BRADY

of Pennsylvania, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. BROWN of California, Mr.

CONYERS, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. DIXON, Mr. FILNER,

Mr. FORD, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. HOYER, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms.

LEE, Ms. LOFGREN, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms.

MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. PASCRELL, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. RODRIGUEZ,

Mr. SAWYER, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. SHOWS, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi,

Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms. WATERS, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide for a

just apportionment of Representatives in Congress for

all States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF SAMPLING.

4 Section 195 of title 13, United States Code, is

5 amended by striking ‘‘Except for the determination of
2

•HR 548 IH

1 population for purposes of apportionment of Representa2 tives in Congress among the several States, the’’ and in3 serting ‘‘The’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT C

Case 1:22-cv-23519-KMM Document 31-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 1 of 3
4874-4216-0975\1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ATLAS AIR, INC., et al.,

Defendants

Case No. 22-cv-23519-KMM-LFL

DECLARATION OF KYLE WEBER

I, KYLE WEBER, declare that if called as a witness in this action, I could and would 

competently testify to the following based on my personal and professional knowledge.

1. I am over 18 years of age, a citizen of the United States, and the managing member 

of EncompassAir, LLC, (“EncompassAir”).

2. EncompassAir is an Alaska limited liability company with its principal place of 

business in Anchorage, Alaska. Encompass’s administrative offices, corporate 

records, executive officers, and financial, accounting, and operational decisionmaking are all located in Alaska. 

3. EncompassAir has never been incorporated in Florida, has no bank account in 

Florida, owns no real property in Florida, and has no business locations in Florida.

4. EncompassAir contractor Mark Thien is not based in Florida for his work for 

EncompassAir, and does no work for Encompass within the State of Florida. 

EncompassAir understands that Mr. Thien does not live in Florida and that he has 

Case 1:22-cv-23519-KMM Document 31-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 2 of 3
- 2 - 

4874-4216-0975\1 

not lived in Florida at any point during his business relationship with 

EncompassAir. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 

true and correct. Executed on this 3RD day of February of 2023. 

 

 By: ______________________________ 

 KYLE WEBER

Case 1:22-cv-23519-KMM Document 31-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 3 of 3
#### § 102-118.615 Will GSA notify a TSP if they internally offset a payment?

Yes, the GSA Transportation Audits Division will inform the TSP if they internally offset a payment.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32326, May 31, 2022]
§ 158.330 Ports and terminals: Equipment. Each port and terminal except ship repair yards, in order to pass the inspection under § 158.160, must— ( a ) At mean low tide and with the ship's manifold 10 feet above the surface of the water, be capable of receiving Category B or C NLS cargo during the stripping operations at an average flow rate of 6 cubic meters (1584 gallons) per hour without the backpressure at the ship's manifold exceeding 101.6 kPa (14.7 pounds per square inch gauge) pressure; and
( b ) Have an instruction manual that lists the equipment and procedures for meeting paragraph (a) of this section. The instruction manual may be made part of the operations manual that is required under § 154.300 of this chapter.
PROMISSORY NOTE

$40,000.00

For Value Received, Sharp Technology, Inc. (maker), promises to pay to the order
of  Gilbert  Gertner (Payee), at 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2222, Houston, Texas
77056,  or  such  other  address  as may be designated by the holder hereof, the
principle  sum of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000.00) together with the interest
at  the  rate  of  10%  per  annumPayment  shall  be  due  on  demand.

Whenever  used  herein, the words "maker" and "payee" shall be deemed to include
their  respective  heirs,  personal  representatives,  successors  and  assigns.

The  maker  hereof  and  all parties who at the time may be liable hereon in any
capacity,  jointly  and  severally,  waive  presentment for payment, protest and
notice  of  dishonor  of  this  note.

This  note  is  executed  and  delivered  and  payable in the State of Texas and
construed  in  accordance  with  the  Laws  of  the  State  of  Texas.

Sharp  Technology,  Inc.

George  Sharp
------------------------------
George  T.  Sharp,  President
Date:  December  12,  2000

                                     - 79 -
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15223]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and Industrial 
Innovation; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and 
Industrial Innovation (1194).
    Date/Time: July 14, 2000; 8:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
    Place: Room 375, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Delcie Durham, Program Director, Materials 
Processing and Manufacturing, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1330.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate ``Unsolicited'' proposals as part 
of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 522b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Note: Closed portions are proper under Sunshine Act exemptions 
cited. The CMO's signature on this Notice is the required 
determination.


    Dated: June 12, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15223 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
|                                                                   |   |   |    | THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------|----------------------|
|                                                                   |   |   |    |  August 28,2010 |   |   |   | August 29,2009 |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |
| Net loss for computing loss per common share                           |   |   |  $ | (165,096        | ) |   | $ |  (16,831 | ) |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average number of common sharesoutstanding during each period |   |   |    | 749,475         |   |   |   | 767,359 |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net loss per common share                                              |   |   |  $ | (0.220          | ) |   | $  | (0.022  | ) |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |    |                 |   |   |   |   |   |
#### PETER BURNS, Respondent, *v.*EDWARD J. O’NEIL, Appellant.

*County*Court— *allegation as to defendamfs residence, whm'e am, action is brought in*— *what sufficient*— *Allegations im pleadings*— *relate to time of beginning suit.*

Appeal from a judgment of tbe Monroe County Court in favor of tbe plaintiff, and also from an order of said court denying a motion for a new trial on a case containing exceptions.

This was an action for assault and battery. Tbe action was commenced by the service of a summons to answer tbe complaint, a copy of which was stated in tbe summons to be annexed thereto. Tbe complaint averred that *“*tbe plaintiff and defendant are residents of tbe county of Monroe.”

*495The court at General Term said: “At the close of the plaintiffs testimony, the defendant’s counsel moved for a nonsuit on two grounds, only one of which need be noticed, to wit, that the court had not jurisdiction of the action. The reason assigned was, that the complaint does not allege that the defendant was a resident of the county of Monroe, at the time of the commencement of the action. The statute gives County Courts jurisdiction in civil actions for the recovery of money, not exceeding $1,000, or of personal property not exceeding that sum in value, in which all the defendants are residents of the county in which the action is brought, at the time of its commencement. (Laws 1870, ch. 467, p. 1041, § 1.) The allegation in the complaint, as to the residence of the defendant, is sufficient. The complaint having been served with the sum mons when the suit was commenced, the averment in it that the plaintiff and defendant ‘are’ residents, etc., has reference to the time of the commencement of the suit. In *Frees*v. *Ford*(2 Seld., 176), cited by the appellant’s counsel, the declaration contained no allegation, whatever, as to the defendant’s residence.”

*Wm. J.*Sheridan, for the appellant. *Townsend da Sullivan,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Smith,'J.;

Mtjllin, P. J., and Taloott, J., concurred.

Judgment and order affirmed.
Exhibit





AMENDMENT TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT


Reference is made to a certain Lock-Up Agreement dated as of December 6, 2017 (the "Lock-Up Agreement"), between the undersigned shareholder ("Shareholder") and Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Apollo"). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings given to such terms in the Lock-Up Agreement.


For valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Apollo and Shareholder agree that the expiration date of the "First Lock-Up Period" (as defined in the Lock Up Agreement), which was previously extended to and including September 30, 2019, is hereby further extended to and including January 31, 2020. Except as expressly amended above, all of the terms and conditions of the Lock-Up Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


AGREED:








"Apollo"     "Shareholder"




By:        _______________________________
Mitchell Kitayama
Lead Independent Committee Director
 
By:
Eric Chin
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 102-118.240 How does my agency get GBL and GTR forms?

The GBL (SF 1103) and GTR (OF 1169) are available in the GSA Forms Library at *https://www.gsa.gov/forms.*

[87 FR 32325, May 31, 2022]
§ 404.1705 Who may be your representative. ( a ) You may appoint as your representative in dealings with us, any attorney in good standing who— ( 1 ) Has the right to practice law before a court of a State, Territory, District, or island possession of the United States, or before the Supreme Court or a lower Federal court of the United States;
( 2 ) Is not disqualified or suspended from acting as a representative in dealings with us; and
( 3 ) Is not prohibited by any law from acting as a representative.
( b ) You may appoint any person who is not an attorney to be your representative in dealings with us if the person— ( 1 ) Is capable of giving valuable help to you in connection with your claim;
( 2 ) Is not disqualified or suspended from acting as a representative in dealings with us;
( 3 ) Is not prohibited by any law from acting as a representative; and
( 4 ) Is generally known to have a good character and reputation. Persons lacking good character and reputation, include, but are not limited to, persons who have a final conviction of a felony (as defined by § 404.1506(c)) or any crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, false statements, misrepresentation, deceit, or theft.
( c ) Your representative(s) must be registered with us in the manner we prescribe.
( d ) We may refuse to recognize your chosen representative if the person does not meet the requirements in this section. We will notify you and the proposed representative if we do not recognize the person as your representative.
[45 FR 52090, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 76 FR 80245, Dec. 23, 2011; 83 FR 30854, July 2, 2018; 89 FR 67554, Aug. 21, 2024]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5362

To increase the amount of fees charged to employers who are petitioners

for the employment of H–1B nonimmigrant workers, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 3, 2000

Mr. DREIER (for himself and Mr. MOAKLEY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To increase the amount of fees charged to employers who

are petitioners for the employment of H–1B nonimmigrant workers, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITIES RELATING TO THE IMPOSITION

4 OF FEES.

5 Section 214(c)(9) of the Immigration and Nationality

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(9)) is amended—

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘(exclud8 ing’’ and all that follows through ‘‘2001)’’ and in9 serting ‘‘(excluding any employer that is a primary

10 or secondary education institution, an institution of
2

HR 5362 IH

1 higher education, as defined in section 101(a) of the

2 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a),

3 a nonprofit entity related to or affiliated with any

4 such institution, a nonprofit entity which engages in

5 established curriculum-related clinical training of

6 students registered at any such institution, a non7 profit research organization, or a governmental re8 search organization) filing before October 1, 2003’’;

9 and

10 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$500’’

11 and inserting ‘‘$1000’’.

12 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

13 The amendment made by section 1(2) shall apply

14 only to petitions that are filed on or after the date that

15 is two months after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 102-192.100 How do we submit our annual mail management report to GSA?

You must submit annual reports using the GSA web based Simplified Mail Accountability Reporting Tool (*SMART*). Training is available from GSA to agency mail managers and other authorized users on how to use the SMART data reporting system. Contact the Office of Government-wide Policy, Mail Management Policy office for access and training at *federal.mail@gsa.gov.*
#### § 952.6 Interim impounding.

In preparation for or during the pendency of a proceeding initiated under 39 U.S.C. 3005, mail addressed to Respondent may be impounded upon obtaining an appropriate order from a United States District Court, as provided in 39 U.S.C. 3007.
§ 101-39.106 Unlimited exemptions. Unlimited exemptions from inclusion in the fleet management system are granted to the specific organizational units or activities of executive agencies listed below. Unlimited exemptions do not preclude agencies from requesting fleet management services, if available, under optional use arrangements. Such optional use services must be authorized under the provisions of Executive Order 10579 and 40 U.S.C. 472. ( a ) Any motor vehicle regularly used by an agency in the performance of investigative, law enforcement, or intelligence duties if the head of that agency or designee makes a determination, in writing (a copy of which shall be forwarded to the Administrator of General Services), that the exclusive control of such vehicles is essential to the effective performance of those duties. Vehicles regularly used for common administrative purposes not directly connected with the performance of law enforcement, investigative, or intelligence duties shall not be exempted from inclusion.
( b ) Motor vehicles designed or used for military field training, combat, or tactical purposes, or used principally within the confines of a regularly established military installation.
( c ) Any motor vehicle exempted from the display of conspicuous identification by the Administrator, GSA, when identification as a Government vehicle would interfere with the purpose for which it is acquired and used.
( d ) Unless inclusion is mutually agreed upon by the Administrator, GSA, and the head of the agency concerned: ( 1 ) Motor vehicles for the use of the heads of the executive agencies, ambassadors, ministers, charges d'affaires, and other principal diplomatic and consular officials.
( 2 ) Motor vehicles regularly and principally used for the transportation of diplomats and representatives of foreign countries or by officers of the Department of State for the conduct of official business with representatives of foreign countries.
( 3 ) Motor vehicles regularly used by the United States Postal Service for the distribution and transportation of mail.
[51 FR 11023, Apr. 1, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 59888, Nov. 26, 1991]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                              29
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    300,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391,689
<PP&E>                                         827,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                 461,076
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 825,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          340,785
<BONDS>                                        232,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     38,275
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   825,903
<SALES>                                        603,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               603,533
<CGS>                                           33,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                363,241
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            363,241
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   363,241
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>