alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(b)





Independent Accountants' Report





The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation



We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 1999-1 (the loans) has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1, 1999 (the Agreement) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003.  Management is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about Household Finance Corporation's compliance based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and in compliance with the audit guide for audits of non-supervised mortgagees approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (to the extent that the procedures in such audit guide are applicable to the servicing obligations set forth in the Agreement), accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Household Finance Corporation's compliance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of loans has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1, 1999 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.



/s/ KPMG LLP



Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2004



Management Assertion





As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the servicing of home equity loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 1999-1 has been conducted by Household Consumer Lending, as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1, 1999.









|/s/ Joe Vozar              | /s/ Jorge Cordon             
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Chief Financial Officer-   | Managing Director-Operations-
|Household Consumer Lending | Household Consumer Lending   
|                           |                              
|                           |                              
|February 28, 2004          | February 28, 2004            
|Date                       | Date
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 557

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to provide a safe harbor

under the anti-kickback statute for hospital restocking of certain ambulance drugs and supplies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. HOBSON, Mr.

LATOURETTE, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. GREEN of

Texas, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. SHOWS, and Mr. BOEHLERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to provide

a safe harbor under the anti-kickback statute for hospital

restocking of certain ambulance drugs and supplies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Safety Act

5 of 1999’’.
2

•HR 557 IH

1 SEC. 2. SAFE HARBOR UNDER THE ANTI-KICKBACK STAT2 UTE FOR HOSPITAL RESTOCKING OF CER3 TAIN AMBULANCE DRUGS AND SUPPLIES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1128B(b)(3) of the Social

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b(b)(3)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara7 graph (E);

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub9 paragraph (F) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraph:

12 ‘‘(G) any remuneration from a hospital to an

13 ambulance provider if—

14 ‘‘(i) the ambulance provider is owned or

15 operated (I) by a State or local government

16 agency or (II) by an organization that is de17 scribed in paragraph (3) or (4) of section

18 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

19 and that is exempt from taxation under section

20 501(a) of such Code;

21 ‘‘(ii) the remuneration is in the form of the

22 replenishment of drugs or supplies, or both,

23 used by the ambulance provider during the

24 transport of a patient to the hospital; and

25 ‘‘(iii) the remuneration is not determined

26 in a manner that takes into account the volume
3

•HR 557 IH

1 or value of any referrals or business otherwise

2 generated between the parties for which pay3 ment may be made in whole or part under a

4 Federal health care program.’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 subsection (a) shall apply to remuneration provided on or

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 101-5.104-2 Basis for determining economic feasibility. ( a ) Whenever possible, determination of the economic feasibility of a proposed centralized service shall be based upon standard data on the relationship of the size of the Federal building, the number of occupants, location, and other factors pertinent to the type of centralized service being considered.
( b ) In the absence of standard data on which a determination of economic feasibility can be based, or where such data must be supplemented by additional factual information, a formal feasibility study may be made by GSA or a CASU workgroup, in coordination with local agencies to be involved, prior to a final determination to proceed with the furnishing of a centralized service. Generally, a formal feasibility study will be made only if provision of the proposed centralized service would involve the pooling of staff, equipment, and space which occupying agencies otherwise would be required to use in providing the service for themselves. Examples of centralized services which may require formal studies include printing and duplicating plants and similar facilities.
( c ) On the basis of experience under the centralized services program, GSA will develop criteria as to cost comparisons, production needs, building population, number of agencies involved, and other appropriate factors for consideration in determining the practicability of establishing various types of centralized services.
[30 FR 4199, Mar. 31, 1965, as amended at 56 FR 33874, July 24, 1991]
#### § 70.05-10 Revocation of merchant mariner credential officer endorsement or license.

Every master, pilot, and engineer, or person or persons acting in such capacity, respectively, on board any boat or vessel who shall willfully injure or destroy an aid to navigation established and maintained by the United States shall be deemed guilty of violating the provisions of § 70.05-1 and shall upon conviction be punished as provided in § 70.05-5 and shall also have his merchant mariner credential officer endorsement or license revoked or suspended for a term to be fixed by the judge before whom tried and convicted.

[CGFR 52-15, 18 FR 12, Jan. 1, 1953, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11211, Mar. 16, 2009]
EXHIBIT 99.7



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:


               SUNBEAM CORPORATION ANNOUNCES ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE

         FORT LAUDERDALE, FL - September 3, 1996 - Sunbeam Corporation
(NYSE:SOC) announced today another organizational change. David G. Sargent,
formerly Vice President and Associate General Counsel of Sunbeam, is no longer
with the Company. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Albert J. Dunlap
continues the rapid pace of change in order to build a highly focused management
team to carry out the restructuring of the Company.
         Sunbeam Corporation is a leading consumer products company that
designs, manufactures and markets, nationally and internationally, a diverse
portfolio of outdoor and household brand name products. The Company's Sunbeam(R)
and Oster(R) brands have been household names for generations, both domestically
and abroad, and the Company is a market leader in many of its product
categories.

                                ****************



Contact:          Pete Judice                        John DeSimone
                  Burson-Marsteller, New York        Manager, Investor Relations
                  (212) 614 - 4506                   Sunbeam Corporation
                                                     (954)767-2100
Exhibit 10.18.1
                                    AMENDMENT
                                     to the
                                ALBERTSON'S, INC.
                         EXECUTIVE PENSION MAKEUP TRUST

         This  Amendment is made by  Albertson's,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation
(the "Corporation" or the "Employer").

                                    RECITALS:

     A. The Corporation has established the Albertson's,  Inc. Executive Pension
Makeup Trust, effective February 1, 1989 (the "Trust");

         B. The Corporation,  pursuant to Section 6.01 of the Trust, retains the
right to amend  the Trust at any time  prior to the time  when the  Trust  shall
become irrevocable pursuant to Section 6.02 thereof; and

         C. The Corporation  certifies that the Trust has not become irrevocable
pursuant to Section 6.02 thereof; and

         D. The  Corporation  has  determined  that it is advisable to amend the
Trust in the manner hereinafter set forth.

                                    AMENDMENT

         The  Trust is  hereby  amended,  as of  December  1,  1998,  to add the
following  language  at the end of the  definition  of  "Change in  Control"  in
Article 1:

         Notwithstanding  the foregoing,  the occurrence of any of the foregoing
         events or transactions shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control of
         the  Employer,  if prior to the  consummation  of any of the  foregoing
         events  or  transactions,  the  Continuing  Directors  (as  defined  in
         paragraph 1 of Article TWELFTH of the Employer's  Restated  Certificate
         of Incorporation,  dated May 27, 1998) adopt a resolution to the effect
         that a Change in Control  for the  purposes  of this Trust shall not be
         deemed to have  occurred  upon the  consummation  of any such  event or
         transaction.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  instrument  has been duly  executed  by the
undersigned  on this  1st  day of  December,  1998  and has  been  delivered  by
facsimile  to the Trustee (as that term is defined in the Trust) of the Trust on
this 1st day of December, 1998.

                                           ALBERTSON'S, INC.


                                           By: /s/  Thomas R. Saldin
                                               Thomas R. Saldin
                                               Executive Vice President and
                                               General Counsel

<PAGE>
§ 386.12 Term sheets and approvals. ( a ) The Corps, after review and evaluation of an application, and all other required documents submitted by a prospective borrower, may offer to such prospective borrower a written term sheet and/or a credit agreement, including detailed terms and conditions that must be met.
( b ) The issuance of a term sheet, upon execution by the Secretary, does not constitute a commitment by the Secretary to enter into the Loan Agreement or Loan Guarantee Agreement. Execution of the Loan Agreement or Loan Guarantee Agreement represents obligation by the Secretary.
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Teleconnect Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned President and Principal Accounting and Financial
Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: December 22, 2006                   /s/ Gustavo Gomez
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Gustavo Gomez, Chief Executive Officer


Date: December 22, 2006                   /s/ Alfonso de Borbon
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Alfonso de Borbon, Chief Financial
                                          Officer
#### § 101-41.000 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR chapter 102, parts 102-1 through 102-220).

For transportation payment and audit policy, see FMR part 102-118 (41 CFR part 102-118).
#### ANANIAS BOYCE, Respondent, v. CYRUS WASHBURN, Appellant.

*Statute of frauds—contract for sale of logs*— *interest in lands.*

This action was brought to recover the price of 206 logs, sold to defendant. The defense was that these logs were delivered under a contract, by which the plaintiff’s assignor agreed to deliver to the defendant all the market pine saw-logs that could be cut from the “ Perry ” lot, in Wilton, the logs to be delivered at defendant’s saw-mill, at two dollars per log, in the years 1873 and 1874, and to be measured and counted at said mill, which logs the defendant agreed to accept and pay for; that the plaintiff’s assignor cut a large number of logs from the lot, in addition to the 206, which he refused to deliver to the defendant, by means of which the defendant had sustained damage. *Held,*that this was not a contract for the sale of standing timber, and that it was not essential to its validity that it should be in writing, and therefore such defense could be established under it.

*Green v. Armstrong (1*Denio, 550) distinguished; *Kilmore*v. *Howlett*(48 N. Y., 569) followed.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

*John C.*Hulbert, for the appellant.

*J. P.*Butler, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001101176
<NAME>     iLive, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       26034
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                 102567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            232667
<PP&E>                                      208700
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              232667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1755304
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     15053
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                508737
<SALES>                                     862614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            862614
<CGS>                                       251204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3370035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           5087373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           18487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (2507128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                            (2507128)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2507128)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.31)


</TABLE>
#### § 101-27.404 Review of items.

Except for standby or reserve stocks, items in inventory shall be reviewed periodically (at least annually) to identify those which are inactive and slow-moving. This review may be conducted coincidently with the normal replenishment or long supply reviews. The estimate of current or future requirements for an item shall be based on its recent history of recurring requirements. Standby items shall also be reviewed at appropriate intervals to substantiate their qualification for inclusion in that category.
§ 101-26.301 Applicability. All executive agencies within the United States (including Hawaii and Alaska), in order to maximize the use of the Government's centralized supply system, shall requisition GSA stock items in accordance with the following: ( a ) When the requirement is for Standard and optional forms, an item produced by the Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (FPI), or an item listed in the procurement list published by the Committee for Purchase from the Blind and Other Severely Handicapped (NIB-NISH), the dollar thresholds and language indicated in paragraph (b) of this section are not applicable and acquisition of such items continues to be as set forth in the applicable sections of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Federal Property Management Regulations and other appropriate regulations. In order to identify FPI/NIB-NISH items stocked by GSA, they are marked with an asterisk in the GSA Supply Catalog NSN index,
( b ) GSA will process all requisitions for stock items, regardless of total line item value, from activities electing to purchase from GSA. If an agency determines that alternative sources are more favorable, the following guidelines shall apply. However, the price alone of an item without other substantive consideration will not be considered as sufficient justification to use alternative sources. (These guidelines also apply to the procurement of special order program (SOP) established source, see § 101-26.102-1.) ( 1 ) When the total value of the line item requirement is less than $100, procurement from other sources is authorized.
( 2 ) When the total value of the line item requirement is $100 or more, but less than $5,000, procurement from other sources is authorized: provided, that a written justification shall be prepared and placed in the purchase file stating that such action is judged to be in the best interest of the Government in terms of the combination of quality, timeliness, and cost that best meets the requirement. Cost comparisons shall include the agency administrative cost to effect a local purchase.
( 3 ) For total line item requirements of $5,000 and over, agencies shall submit a requisition to GSA unless a waiver has been approved by GSA. Request for waivers shall be submitted in accordance with § 101-26.100-2.
( c ) Agencies shall not divide requisitions to avoid higher threshold documentation requirements.
( d ) In authorizing procurements in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section, agencies shall reimburse GSA for any cost arising out of breach of a GSA contract, where sufficient justification is not documented in their procurement files.
[56 FR 12457, Mar. 26, 1991]
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Robert W. Humphreys, the Chief Executive Officer of Delta Apparel, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedJuly 2, 2011of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:September 1, 2011/s/ Robert W. HumphreysRobert W. HumphreysChairman and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Delta Apparel, Inc. and will be retained by Delta Apparel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5536 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5536

 To declare the policy of the United States with respect to deployment 
                 of a National Missile Defense System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 24, 2000

 Mr. Vitter (for himself, Mr. Armey, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Stump, Mr. Hunter, 
  Mr. Cox. Mrs. Fowler, Mr. Thornberry, and Mr. Hayes) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To declare the policy of the United States with respect to deployment 
                 of a National Missile Defense System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Security Against Nuclear Enemies Act 
of 2000''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE POLICY.

    The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Director of the Ballistic 
Missile Defense Organization to design and deploy a land-based and sea-
based National Missile Defense system capable of defending the national 
territory of the United States against ballistic missile attack as soon 
as technologically possible.
                                 <all>
```