alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subject: Relationship between W126 annual values and 3-year average 

From: David Mintz OAR/OAQPS/AQAD/AQAG 

To: Reconsideration of the 2008 Ozone NAAQS Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172) 

Memo to Docket 

The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the relationship between annual W126 

values and the 3-year averages of the annual values. The annual W126 value can be quite 

variable from year-to-year, ranging by as much as 28 ppm-hours in a 3-year period at a 

single monitoring site. 

Given the form of the proposed secondary standard is a 3-year average of annual W126 

values, it is important to understand the relationship between the average and single-year 

values. Because relatively high 1-year values can occur in a given 3-year period, there is 

a question of what level of a 3-year standard will “protect against” single-year peaks. 

The scatter plot below shows the county-level comparison of the annual W126 values for 

2007, 2008, and 2009 plotted against the 3-year average. (The annual values are the 

highest among all monitors in the county in each year. The 3-year average is the highest 

average among all monitors in the county.) 

 

Based on the underlying data, a hypothetical 3-year/13 ppm-hours standard protects 

against annual W126 values above 15 ppm-hours for 79 percent of counties. That is, 424 

of the 535 counties meeting a 3-year/13 ppm-hours standard have no annual W126 value 

above 15 in any year of the 3-year period. 

In terms of county-years (i.e. the number of counties times the number of years in the 

analysis), 93 percent of the county-years meeting a 3-year/13-ppm-hours standard also 

meet a 1-year/15 ppm-hours level. That is, 1492 of the 1605 county-years meeting a 3-

year/13-ppm-hours standard also meet a 1-year/15 ppm-hours level. 

Notes on data source and handling: 

For this comparison, 2007-2009 monitoring data were obtained from EPA’s Air Quality 

System (AQS). Annual and three-year average W126 values were computed for each 

monitor in accordance with the data handling procedures in the proposed 40 CFR Part 50 

Appendix P (http://www.epa.gov/air/ozonepollution/fr/20100119.pdf).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-30620

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ULYSSES S. GRANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CR-60055-2

- - - - - - - - - -

December 12, 2001

Before HIGGINGBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Ulysses

S. Grant, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Grant

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has not

filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous appellate issue. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 539 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 539

  To establish 9-1-1 as the universal emergency assistance number for 
       wireless telecommunications users, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

  Ms. Danner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish 9-1-1 as the universal emergency assistance number for 
       wireless telecommunications users, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) states and localities have adopted different emergency 
        telephone numbers for cellular telephone users seeking 
        emergency assistance;
            (2) 9-1-1 is used as the emergency assistance number for 
        wire-based telecommunications; and
            (3) almost one-third of the pedestrian deaths on the 
        Interstate Highway System involve stranded motorists who leave 
        their vehicles.

SEC. 2. UNIVERSAL EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER.

    (a) Designation of Universal Assistance Number.--The number 9-1-1 
is designated as the universal wireless emergency telephone number 
within the United States.
    (b) Federal Agency Use of Universal Assistance Number.--Any 
department, agency, officer or instrumentality of the United States, 
State or local government that establishes or operates a wireless 
communications system for use by the public in whole or in part to 
report emergencies shall ensure--
            (1) the system accommodates the number 9-1-1 and;
            (2) uses the number 9-1-1 for the reporting of emergencies 
        by the public.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Defensive Information Operations (formerly known as the Task Force on Information Warfare—Defense) will meet in closed session on July 12-14, 2000, at the Strategic Analysis Conference Center, 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting, the Task Force will review the progress made since the 1996 Defense Science Board report on Information Warfare—Defense and determine the adequacy of the Department's process in providing information assurance to carry out Joint Vision 2010 in the face of information warfare attacks.

In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has been determined that this Defense Science Board meetings, concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly these meetings will be closed to the public.

Dated: June 9, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-15077  Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10—M
§ 101-30.305 Exemptions from the system. When an agency believes that the benefits of the Federal Catalog System may be realized without formal participation, a request for an exemption shall be submitted to the General Services Administration (FRI), Washington, DC 20406. After reviewing the request for an exemption, GSA will inform the requesting agency of the decision and will provide instructions for implementation. The request for an exemption shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: ( a ) Number of items repetitively procured, stored, distributed, or issued.
( b ) Number of items currently used having national stock numbers.
( c ) Identification system planned or in use other than the Federal catalog system.
( d ) Whether procurement is centralized.
( e ) Description of any catalogs published. If none, so state.
( f ) Whether supply support is received from another agency including the name of the agency and category of item involved; e.g., electronics.
( g ) Cost differential between submitting a request for cataloging action and identifying the item under the agency's current or planned system.
[43 FR 42257, Sept. 20, 1978, as amended at 46 FR 35645, July 10, 1981]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5452 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5452

               For the relief of Andrea Patricia Burton.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2000

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Andrea Patricia Burton.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ANDREA PATRICIA BURTON.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Andrea Patricia Burton 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Andrea Patricia Burton enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Andrea Patricia Burton, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Andrea 
Patricia Burton shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report**
 
2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ID 1.2:D 64/
Item Number:0900-I-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000642904
 
December 18, 2019
Order entered March 4, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01206 - CV IN THE ESTATE OF ROB ERTO REFUGIO DE JESU S

GONZALEZ BARRERA On Appeal from the Probate Cour t No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 15 - 02268 - 1

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s March 2, 2020 unopposed third motion for an extension of time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to March 23, 20 20 . We caution appellant that further extension requests will be strongly disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1781 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 13DIV-C-4 5 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/29/2008 10:46:24

AM Sheet 131 of 142P. 2

* To m Driscol l

07/26/200 0 05:5 7 PA

A 

# 3L-C - 

# */« " To : Isr@dc2.hhlaw.co m cc : Karen Blanchard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , Pa m Smith/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA . Denni s Crumpler/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , AAik e 5ewell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , Dav e Svendsgaard/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , Jo n Devine/DC/USEPA/US@EPA , Holmes.Carol@EPA.GOV , Ann a Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EP A 

# K Clnunttstcomplex . Leslie : Subject : Question s o n you r Clean Uni t Tes t Issu e Raper

EP A AI R DOCKE

T Attache d ar e question s concernin g th e clea n uni t tes t issu e pape r tha t w e discusse d yesterday . I f yo u hav e an y questions , pleas e emai l me . thanks , To mDriscoll OAQPS/ITPID/II G (MD-12 ) (919 ) 541-513 5

7/2 6 - E-Mai l fromTo mDriscoll , EPA/OAQP S t o Lesli e Ritts , Hoga n & Hartso nP. 3

July 26,200 0 Question s on th e "Clea

n Unit s Issu e Paper " submitted a s par to f th e July 20,200 0 Memorandu

m fro m Representative s of

th e NS RRefor

m "Comple

x Manufacturing Group "

- Pag e 7 , third paragraph : W e ar e no t awar e o f permit condition s tha

t allo w contro l equipmen

t t o b e operatin g "virtually al l time s tha t th e process , production , or manufacturing equipmen

t i s operated " an

d define virtually all time s to b e les s tha n "all th e time. " Thi s conditio n i s no t clea r t o us , but it migh t b e perceive d a s allowin g aunit to b e ou t o f complianc e fo

r th e perio do f

time suc h a s th e 2 % i n your

example . Also , i n th e (2 ) sectio n o f thi s paragraph , although unsaid , di d you inten d fo

r adequat e complianc e assurance s measure s to b e determine dthroug h th e permittin g proces s fo r each Clea n Uni t Test ?

- Pag e 8 , first

paragraph : It

i s no t clea r wha t th e effective dat

e woul dbe .

- Pag e 8 , table : Regardin g contro l technologies , pleas e clarif y wha t w e thin k w e hear dyesterda y whic h seemed t o b e conflictin g opinion s o n whethe r Californi acontro l level s coul do r shoul d apply to area s othe

r tha n California .

- Pag e 9 , firs t

bullet : W e ar e no t entirely clea

r o n wha t i s mean t b y th e firs t

bullet . Pleas e explain .

- Pag e 9 , second bullet : W

e ar e no t clea r o n wha t thi s bullet s says , bu t

w e thin k you ma y mea n point s raise d in pas t

discussion s regardin g th e change s alloweda t aClea n Uni t andtha t thes e change s woul d no t

b e subject to minor NSR . Pleas e clarify .

- Pag e 9 , fift

h bullet : Doe s your

referenc e to "wast

e minimization " refe

r t o reduction s i n anothe

r media , such a s RCR

A reductions , wher

e thes e reduction s coun

t towar dth e Clea n Uni t exemption ? I f

so , wha t decisio n rule s woul dyo u use ?



# a
(Logo) HUNTINGTON MORTGAGE COMPANY

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

(A)I have  reviewed the activities and performance of the  Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these  Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled all of its
duties,  responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements  throughout such
year,  or if there has been a default or failure of the  servicer to perform any
of such  duties,  responsibilities or  obligations,  a  description  of each
default or  failure and the nature and  status  thereof  has been  reported  to
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

(c) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer  Guide
are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood  Insurance  Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged Property,  have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

(E) All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance on any
Mortgaged Property, have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
required per section 6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the Internal  Revenue Code,
respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:


Officer
Vice President
Title


July 7,2000
Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERNET LAW LIBRARY, INC. AS OF 6-30-00 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         164,143
<SECURITIES>                                 1,650,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,980,901
<PP&E>                                      19,621,945
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,389,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,213,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,475,093
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,709,000
<COMMON>                                       155,146
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,874,544
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,213,783
<SALES>                                        459,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               459,580
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,701,283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,279,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,279,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Searched for **https://www.ibwc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ibwc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Fantastic Financial Corporation
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                             /S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 101-27.201 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides for the identification, designation of useful life, and establishment of controls for shelf-life items to minimize loss and insure maximum use prior to deterioration. A shelf-life item is any item possessing deteriorative or unstable characteristics to the degree that a storage period must be assigned to assure the issuance of material that will perform satisfactorily in service.

[32 FR 6493, Apr. 27, 1967]
# Spreading Wings S800 EVO Product Release Notes

©201 3 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved. Date Release Status S800 EVO User Manual Version : 2013.07.02
: Evaluation
: 1.0 0 Functions and Features:  Highly integrated designs & Reinforced mechanical structures  Stabilized dynamical system  High
- efficiency power reserve  P ortability d esigns of retractable landing gear, foldable propellers and collapsible GPS Mount  Easy and prompt assembly & electrical connections units  ESC integrated with built
- in LED and internal radiator  High performance vibration dampers  High performance brushless motor