alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Reform  and
Investor  Protection  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.  1350,  as  adopted),  I,  Fred
Heferon,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
herebys certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

     1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December
31,  2002,  and to which this  Certification  is attached  as Exhibit  99.1 (the
"PERIODIC  REPORT")  fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  of the Company at the end of the
period  covered by the Periodic  Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: March 26, 2003


S/ Fred Hefferon
-----------------------------
Fred Hefferon
CEO & CFO

THIS  CERTIFICATION   ACCOMPANIES  THIS  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SS.  906  OF  THE
SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED  "FILED" BY THE  COMPANY FOR
PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
#### § 3050.26 Documentation of demand elasticities and volume forecasts.

By January 20 of each year, the Postal Service shall provide econometric estimates of demand elasticity for all postal products accompanied by the underlying econometric models and the input data sets used; and a volume forecast for the current fiscal year, and the underlying volume forecasting model.
#### § 101-27.300 Scope.

This subpart prescribes policy and procedures to assure maximum use of inventories based upon recognized economic limitations.
§ 959.5 Appeals from demands. ( a ) A party upon whom a demand for postage has been made may appeal from the demand by filing a petition, in triplicate, with the Recorder, Judicial Officer Department, within 15 days after receipt of the demand.
( b ) The petition shall: ( 1 ) Be signed personally by an individual petitioner, by one of the partners of a partnership, or by an officer of a corporation or association;
( 2 ) State the reasons why the person filing the petition (designated the “Petitioner” in these rules) believes the demand is not justified;
( 3 ) Admit or deny each fact alleged in the demand and allege any facts upon which the Petitioner relies to show compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and,
( 4 ) Be accompanied by a copy of the demand.
( c ) Factual allegations that are not denied by the petition may be deemed to have been admitted. The demand and the petition (together with other documents authorized in this part) shall become the pleadings in appeals from demands.
[39 FR 33213, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended at 63 FR 66052, Dec. 1, 1998]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 27, 2016

d0919 

# Order

Clerk September 27, 2016

151621 & (58)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151621

COA: 318697

Livingston CC: 13

- 021225

- FC

KEVIN MICHAEL CLARK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the motion to remand are considered. Pursuant to

MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment

of the Court of Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Livingston Circuit Court to

determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under

the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge , 498 Mich 358 (2015), and to

determine whether the post

- sentencing amendment to the presentence investigation report

would have caused the court to impose a differ ent sentence. With regard to the Lockridge

issue, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If,

after taking into account both the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion and the

amendment to the presentence in vestigation report, the trial court determines that it

would have imposed the same sentence, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If,

however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence, it

shall resentence the defendant . In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because

we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this

Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is publishing notice of proposed release of 0.027 acres of land at the New Kent County Airport, New Kent County, Virginia to the Virginia Department of Transportation for the Improvement of Virginia Route 676. There are no impacts to the Airport and the land is not needed for airport development as shown on the Airport Layout Plan. Fair Market Value of the land will be paid to the Airport Sponsor, and used for Airport purposes.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before July 17, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered in triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Terry J. Page, Manager, FAA Washington Airports District Office, P.O. Box 16780, Washington, DC 20041-6780.

In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be mailed or delivered to Michael St. Jean, Manager, New Kent County Airport, at the following address: Michael St. Jean, Airport Manager, New Kent County, P.O. Box 50, New Kent, Virginia 23124.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Terry Page, Manager, Washington Airports District Office, P.O. Box 16780, Washington, DC 20041-6780; telephone (703) 661-1354, fax (703) 661-1370, email Terry.Page@faa.gov.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On April 5, 2000, new authorizing legislation became effective. That bill, the Wendell H. Ford Aviation investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, Public Law 10-181 (Apr. 5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61) (AIR 21) requires that a 30 day public notice must be provided before the Secretary may waive any condition imposed on an interest in surplus property.

Issued in Chantilly, Virginia, on May 30, 2000.

Terry J. Page,

Manager, Washington Airports District Office, Eastern Region.

[FR Doc. 00-15213 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allen
Telecom Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, Robert G. Paul, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Allen Telecom Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: (1) such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Allen Telecom Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2003,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Allen Telecom Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Allen Telecom Inc.


Date: May 14, 2003                      By:         /s/ Robert G. Paul
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                      Robert G. Paul
                                                        President
                                                 (Chief Executive Officer)
#### § 101-30.602 Authority for issuance.

The GSA section of the Federal Supply Catalog is issued as an integral part of the Federal Supply Catalog and the Federal Catalog System as prescribed in subpart 101-30.1. The Commissioner, Federal Supply Service, is authorized to publish catalogs for those items and programs for which GSA furnishes supply support to Federal agencies.

[35 FR 3071, Feb. 17, 1970]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, William L.
Walton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William L. WaltonName:
    William L. WaltonDate: May  8, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
United Surgical Partners International, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-64926) on Form S-8 of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. of our
reports dated March 10, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
United Surgical Partners International, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule,
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc.

Our report dated March 10, 2005, on management's assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, contains an
explanatory paragraph which states that, in conducting the Company's evaluation
of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting,
management excluded the acquisition of the following subsidiaries, which were
completed by the Company in 2004. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. also excluded an
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the subsidiaries
listed below:

         o        SSI Holdings, Inc.

         o        USP Baltimore, Inc.

         o        USP Chicago, Inc.

         o        USP Houston, Inc. (Investment in Memorial Hermann/USP Surgery
                  Centers III, L.L.P.)

         o        USP Mission Hills, Inc.

         o        USP Newport News, Inc.

         o        USP Oklahoma, Inc. (Investment in Southwest Ambulatory Surgery
                  Center, L.L.C.)

         o        USP Reading, Inc.

         o        USP San Antonio, Inc.

         o        USP Sarasota, Inc.



KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2005
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, JamesJ. Horvath, Chief Executive Officer and President of American Crystal SugarCompany, (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:

 

1.   The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended May 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.   Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 15th day of July,2005.

 

 
| By:                                                       | /s/ James J. Horvath |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   Name: James J. Horvath                        |                 |
|   Title: President and Chief  Executive Officer |                 |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 26707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11221]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Appointments to Performance Review Board for Senior Executive 
Service

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Appointment of Performance Review Board for Senior Executive 
Service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee For Purchase from People Who Are Blind Or 
Severely Disabled (Committee) has announced the following appointments 
to the Committee Performance Review Board.
    The following individuals are appointed as members of the Committee 
Performance Review Board responsible for making recommendations to the 
appointing and awarding authorities on performance appraisal ratings 
and performance awards for Senior Executive Service employees:

Perry E. Anthony, PhD, Deputy Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services 
Administration, Department of Education.
James H. Omvig, Sr., Private Citizen.
J. Anthony Poleo, Principal Deputy Comptroller, Defense Logistics 
Agency.

    All appointments are made pursuant to Section 4314 of Chapter 43 of 
Title 5 of the United States Code.

DATES: Effective Date: May 10, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Briscoe, Telephone: (703) 
603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or e-mail CMTEFedReg@abilityone.gov.

Patricia Briscoe,
Deputy Director, Business Operations (Pricing and Information 
Management).
[FR Doc. 2011-11221 Filed 5-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF P.A.

PETITION OF: J.A., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 21 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: D.A.

PETITION OF: J.A., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 22 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: G.A.

PETITION OF: J.A., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 23 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 1
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00144

- CR

J WAN M C M AHON AKA J WAN

M C M AHAN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Criminal District

Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1543066D)

February 6, 2020

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie S udderth

________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Suddert h
Exhibit C

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 99-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 1 of 3
From: Joseph Kaye

To: defink@Venable.com

Cc: Adam Moskowitz; dboies@bsfllp.com; aboies@bsfllp.com; Stephen N. Zack; Brooke Alexander; Rejane Passos

Subject: Re: Garrison, et al. v. Bankman-Fried, et al., No.

Date: Monday, March 6, 2023 5:47:51 PM

Attachments: Garrison v. Bankman-Fried - Waiver Return - Naomi Osaka.pdf

Garrison v. Bankman-Fried - Waiver Request - Naomi Osaka.pdf

D.E. 16 Amended Complaint.pdf

David,

Thanks for the call just now and great to meet you. As discussed, attached are the operative

complaint and the materials for waiving service for Ms. Osaka. Let me know if there is

anything else you need from our end or if there is anything you would like to discuss.

Thanks.

Best,

Joseph M. Kaye, P.A.

Partner

The Moskowitz Law Firm, PLLC

P.O. Box 141609

Coral Gables, FL 33114

For Hand Deliveries Use:

251 Valencia Ave #141609

Coral Gables, FL 33114

Office: (305) 740-1423

Direct: (786) 309-9585

Note: The information in this email is confidential and intended to be legally privileged. If

you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information

contained herein; please advise the sender immediately by reply email and delete this

message and any attachments without retaining a copy. Although this email and any

attachments are believed to be free of any viruses or other defects that may affect any

computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the

recipient to ensure that it is virus-free and no responsibility is accepted by The Moskowitz

Law Firm or the sender of this email for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER: The IRS now requires written advice (including electronic

communications) regarding one or more Federal (i.e., United States) tax issues to meet

certain standards. Those standards involve a detailed and careful analysis of the facts and

applicable law which we expect would be time consuming and costly. We have not made

and have not been asked to make that type of analysis in connection with any advice given

in this e-mail. As a result, we are required to advise you that any Federal tax advice

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 99-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 2 of 3
rendered in this e-mail is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used for the

purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the IRS.

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 99-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2023 Page 3 of 3
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAerothermal tests of a 12.5 percent cone at Mach 6.7 for various Reynolds numbers, angles of attack and nose shapesThe effects of free-stream unit Reynolds number, angle of attack, and nose shape on the aerothermal environment of a 3-ft basediameter, 12.5 deg half-angle cone were investigated in the Langley 8-foot high temperature tunnel at Mach 6.7. The average total temperature was 3300 R, the freestream unit Reynolds number ranged from 400,000 to 1,400,000 per foot, and the angle of attack ranged from 0 deg to 10 deg. Three nose configurations were tested on the cone: a 3-in-radius tip, a 1-in-radius tip on an ogive frustum, and a sharp tip on an ogive frustum. Surface-pressure and cold-wall heating-rate distributions were obtained for laminar, transitional temperature in the shock layer were obtained. The location of the start of transition moved forward both on windward and leeward sides with increasing free-stream Reynolds numbers, increasing angle of attack, and decreasing nose bluntness.Document ID19850009013Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsNowak, R. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Albertson, C. W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Hunt, L. R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberL-15729NASA-TP-2345NAS 1.60:2345Accession Number85N17322Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-51-23Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850009013.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Yearly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Govatski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski

Chief Executive Officer



April 17, 2007
###### Editorial Note on Part 101-8

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-8.711 General responsibilities.

Each recipient of Federal financial assistance from GSA is responsible for ensuring that its programs or activities comply with the Act and this regulation and must take steps to eliminate violations of the Act. A recipient is also responsible for maintaining records, providing information, and affording GSA access to its records to the extent GSA finds necessary to determine whether the recipient is complying with the Act and this regulation.