alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 67

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

#### § 67.01-10 Delegation of functions.

The Coast Guard District Commander may delegate the authority for performing inspections, enforcement, and administration of regulations to any civilian or military position in the Coast Guard.

[USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, May 5, 2004]
Exhibit 31(b)



CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Teresa B. Dickey, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NMXS.com, Inc.



2.  Based on my knowledge, this amended yearly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended yearly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended yearly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended yearly report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the a registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended yearly report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended yearly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



(c) presented in this amended yearly report my conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date





5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and



(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6.   I have indicated in this amended yearly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated: April 14, 2005



/s/ Teresa B. Dickey

Teresa B. Dickey

Principal Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Minutesof meetings of the Combined Chiefs of Staff, Post-Arcadia
 
epub|mobi| pdf|
 
SuDoc Number:D 5.2:C 76/2
Item Number:0315 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001021884
January 28, 2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Joint Service Committee on Military Justice (JSC).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda for the 2000 draft annual review public meeting of the JSC. This notice also describes the functions of the JSC.

# DATES:

Wednesday, 28 June 2000 at 2 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Room 808, 1501 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22209-2403.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lieutenant Colonel Thomas C. Jaster, U.S. Air Force Legal Services Agency, 112 Luke Avenue, Room 343, Bolling Air Force Base, Washington, DC 20332-8000, (202) 767-1539; FAX (202) 404-8755

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 

## Agenda

                    The JSC will receive public comment concerning its 2000 draft annual review of the Manual for Courts-Martial as published in the                     **Federal Register**                     at 65 FR 30963 on May 15, 2000.                

                    The Judge Advocates General established the JSC in 1972. The JSC currently operates under Department of Defense Directive 5500.17, May 8, 1996. The function of the JSC is to improve military justice through preparation and                           ( print page 37531)                        evaluation of proposed amendments and changes to the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Manual for Courts-Martial.                

This notice is provided in accordance with DoD Directive 5500.17, “Role and Responsibilities of the Joint Service Committee (JSC) on Military Justice,” May 8, 1996. This notice is intended only to improve the internal management of the Federal Government. It is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at lay by any party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-15081  Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
§ 25.127 Reconsideration. ( a ) The settlement authority may reconsider a claim upon the authority's own initiative or upon request of the claimant or someone acting on the claimant's behalf.
( b ) A request for reconsideration must be in writing and include the legal or factual grounds for the relief requested.
( c ) Following any investigation or other action deemed necessary for reconsideration of the original action, the settlement authority reconsiders the claim and if warranted attempts to settle it. When further settlement efforts appear unwarranted, the settlement authority notifies the claimant in writing by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, that the relief requested is denied.
( d ) For the effect of reconsideration under the Federal Tort Claims Act see 28 CFR Part 14.
CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Teresa B. Dickey, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of NMXS.com, Inc.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended yearly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended yearly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended yearly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended yearly report;

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the a registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended yearly report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended yearly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

(c) presented in this amended yearly report my conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date

 

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

 

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.  I have indicated in this amended yearly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Dated:March 24, 2006

 

/s/ Teresa B. Dickey

Teresa B. Dickey

Principal Financial Officer
§ 183.526 Carburetors. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Each carburetor must not leak more than five cubic centimeters of fuel in 30 seconds when: ( 1 ) The float valve is open;
( 2 ) The carburetor is at half throttle; and
( 3 ) The engine is cranked without starting; or
( 4 ) The fuel pump is delivering the maximum pressure specified by its manufacturer.
( c ) Each updraft and horizontal draft carburetor must have a device that: ( 1 ) Collects and holds fuel that flows out of the carburetor venturi section toward the air intake;
( 2 ) Prevents collected fuel from being carried out of the carburetor assembly by the shock wave of a backfire or by reverse air flow; and
( 3 ) Returns collected fuel to the engine induction system after the engine starts,
[CGD 74-209, 42 FR 5950, Jan. 31, 1977, as amended by CGD 77-98, 42 FR 36253, July 14, 1977]
#### § 101-26.600 Scope and applicability of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the policies, procedures, and limitations relating to civil agency use of procurement sources of the Department of Defense (DOD), which include the Defense supply centers of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) and the inventory control points of the military departments. The provisions of this subpart 101-26.6 are applicable to executive agencies unless otherwise specifically indicated. Other Federal agencies are encouraged to satisfy their requirements in the same manner.

[42 FR 58748, Nov. 11, 1977]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

-vsSAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

NOTICE OF STRIKING

Stuart Z. Grossman, Esq. and Manuel A. Arteaga-Gomez, Esq., of the law firm Grossman 

Roth Yaffa Cohen, P.A., hereby enter this Notice of Striking the Notice of Appearance (DE 89) as 

it was mistakenly filed as a New Filer. A corrected Notice of Appearance is being filed.

Dated: March 9, 2023.

Respectfully submitted,

Stuart Z. Grossman

Florida Bar No.: 156113

Manuel A. Arteaga-Gomez

Florida Bar No.: 18122

GROSSMAN ROTH YAFFA COHEN, P.A.

2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 1150

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Ph: 305-442-8666

Fx: 305-285-1668

szg@grossmanroth.com

aag@grossmanroth.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 91 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2023 Page 1 of 2
I hereby certify that on March 9, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed 

with the Court via the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys 

of record.

Stuart Z. Grossman

Florida Bar No.: 156113

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 91 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Albertson's, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended August 1, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lawrence R. Johnston, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Felicia D. Thornton, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his/her knowledge:

      (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
               all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date: September 13, 2002                /S/ Lawrence R. Johnston
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lawrence R. Johnston
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                          and Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 13, 2002                /S/ Felicia D. Thornton
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Felicia D. Thornton
                                        Executive Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.21 of Part 101-6
Editorial Note: For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982, 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983, and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

§ 101-6.2106 What procedures apply to the selection of programs and activities under these regulations? ( a ) A State may select any program or activity published in the Federal Register in accordance with § 101-6.2103 of this part for intergovernmental review under these regulations. Each State, before selecting programs and activities, shall consult with local elected officials.
( b ) Each State that adopts a process shall notify the Administrator of the GSA programs and activities selected for that process.
( c ) A State may notify the Administrator of changes in its selections at any time. For each change, the State shall submit to the Administrator an assurance that the State has consulted with elected local elected officials regarding the change. GSA may establish deadlines by which States are required to inform the Administrator of changes in their program selections.
( d ) The Administrator uses a State's process as soon as feasible, depending on individual programs and activities, after the Administrator is notified of its selections.
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BRIAN KERRY O'KEEFE, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

### Respondent. No. 69036 

# FILED

JUN 2 2 2016

TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERgF UPREME COURT BY •

DEPUTY CLERK



### ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.

Appellant filed his postconviction petition on September 15, 2014, more than one year after the remittitur issued on direct appeal on July 23, 2013. 1 

### O'Keefe v. State, Docket No. 61631 (Order of Affirmance, April 10, 2013). Therefore, the petition was untimely filed and procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and prejudice. 

### See NRS 34.726(1).

As cause to overcome the procedural default, appellant argues that counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion for a stay of the remittitur in his direct appeal. Had counsel done so, he contends, his postconviction petition would have been timely under NRS 34.726. Counsel's failure to seek a stay of the remittitur is not an impediment
'The district court appointed counsel to represent appellant in the postconviction proceedings. 

### See NRS 34.750.

(0) 1947A QC°J.

external to the defense that prevented appellant from timely filing his postconviction petition. 

### Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252, 

### 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). Because appellant failed to establish good cause to excuse the delay in filing his petition, the district court did not err by denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

J. Cherry

Gibboffs

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Brian Kerry O'Keefe Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 We have considered the pro se document filed in this court on April 7, 2016, and conclude that no relief is warranted.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A en
EXHIBIT 11.a
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                   SUNBEAM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                     CALCULATIONS OF PRIMARY EARNINGS
                         PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED            NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                               OCTOBER 1,  SEPTEMBER 29,   OCTOBER 1,    SEPTEMBER 29,
                                                              --------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                                   1995         1996            1995        1996
                                                                      (Unaudited)                  (Unaudited)

<S>                                                            <C>             <C>           <C>           <C>
Net earnings (loss) applicable to common
 shareholders .............................................   $    9,007      $(18,088)     $50,450       $ 6,478
                                                              ==========       ========      =======       =======

Weighted average number of common
 shares outstanding .......................................       81,374         83,578      81,517        82,543
     
Add:
 Common shares issuable for exercise of
 warrants and options, net of shares
 assumed to have been acquired with
 proceeds therefrom .......................................          904         --           1,440           685
                                                              ----------      --------       -------      -------

Number of shares applicable to primary
 earnings (loss) per share calculation ....................       82,278        83,578       82,957        83,228
                                                              ==========       ========     =======       =======

Primary earnings (loss) per share of
 common stock .............................................   $      .11      $   (.22)    $   .61      $   .08

</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14

- 1050 V

Filed: January 12, 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

AMY FOGG, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

v. * Cause

- in

- fact; Tdap; Shoulder Injury

* Related to Vaccine Administration

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (SIRVA)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Vowell , Special Master:

On October 28 , 2014

, Amy Fogg filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

, 2 [ the

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]

. The petition alleges that Ms. Fogg suffered a left shoulder

injury as a result of the administration of a tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (“ Tdap”)

vaccination on February 12

, 2014

. ( Petition at p. 1

. )

On January 12 , 2015 , respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report [“Respondent’s

Report”], in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case.

Respondent’s Report at 3 . Specifically, respondent submits that “petitioner’s alleged

injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA.)” and

respondent “further agrees that petitioner’s SIRVA was caused

- in

- fact by the Tdap

vaccination she rec eived on February 12, 2014. No other cause for petitioner’s SIRVA

were identified.” Respondent’s Report at 3. Respondent concluded that “based on the

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, it will be

posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 28 99, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501

note (2006)) . In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

p rivacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of cita tion, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2006).current record, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the

act.” Id

.

I n view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that

petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowe ll

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master