alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 36307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14619]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 111 / Thursday, June 8, 2000 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 36307]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2000-20 of May 31, 2000

                
Presidential Determination on Assistance for 
                Peacekeeping in Sierra Leone

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                    Pursuant to the authority vested in me as 
                President, including under section 10(d)(1) of the 
                United Nations Participation Act of 1945, as amended 
                (22 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) (the ``Act''), I hereby 
                determine that the furnishing, without regard to 
                section 10(a) of the Act, of assistance covered by 
                section 10 of the Act that is provided in support of 
                peacekeeping efforts in Sierra Leone is important to 
                the security interests of the United States.
                    You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress and to publish it in the 
                Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 31, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00-14619
Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30, 

2024

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00157-CV

ROBERT KLINEK, Appellant

V.

KHALED ALATTAR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-54501

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed February 8, 2024. On May 16, 2024, 

appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Wilson.
Produced and published at U.S. taxpayer expense

Taking Service Grants to 

the Next (Evidence) Level

What is 

Evidence?

At the heart of all AmeriCorps programs is evidence – the data and reporting 

that measures program performance. The stronger the evidence, the greater 

confidence that the program is effective. 

AmeriCorps and its programs such as AmeriCorps State and National (ASN) 

provide strategic grants to organizations that engage in service to address 

local and national challenges. ASN grants build organizational capacity and 

expand effective programming, while also assessing program performance 

across the evidence continuum. This helps AmeriCorps maximize the impact 

of federal dollars.

Why Does Evidence Matter?

Through strategic grantmaking and collecting 

evidence, AmeriCorps:

Measures program effectiveness and

how populations are impacted 

by service.

Grows the list of effective programs 

with proven outcomes by cataloguing 

successes.

Demonstrates efficient use of federal 

funding by investing in program 

models with real impact.

Reaches more people by providing 

insight into how to replicate and scale 

effective programs.

Increases the understanding of national 

service and its role in addressing 

national and local challenges. 

Foster a culture of learning and 

continuous improvement that enables 

national service to tailor engagement 

based on needs and purpose.

How Is Evidence Applied To 

AmeriCorps?

In 2023, 64% of ASN competitive grant funding was 

invested in programs with moderate to strong evidence 

of effectiveness.*

ASN has increasingly invested in what works by 

supporting programs with moderate to strong levels 

of evidence:

Percentage of ASN competitive funding awarded to 

projects with moderate or strong level of evidence

*Evidence produced by study designs that support causal impact

attributable to the intervention program model.

For more information, contact the AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation at evaluation@americorps.gov. 

About the Office of Research and Evaluation

The AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation assists AmeriCorps and its partners in collecting, analyzing, and disseminating data and insights 

about AmeriCorps programs and civic life in America. 

AboutAmeriCorps

AmeriCorps, the federal agency for national service and volunteerism, provides opportunities for Americans to serve their country domestically, 

address the nation’s most pressing challenges, improve lives and communities, and strengthen civic engagement. Each year, the agency places 

more than 200,000 AmeriCorps members and AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers in intensive service roles; and empowers millions more to serve as 

long-term, short-term, or one-time volunteers. Learn more at AmeriCorps.gov.
§ 101-5.307 Public Health Service. ( a ) The only authorized contact point for assistance of and consultation with the Public Health Service is the Federal Employee Health Programs, Division of Hospitals, Public Health Service, Washington, DC 20201. Other Federal agencies may be designated by the GSA Regional Administrator, pursuant to § 101-5.105(b) to operate occupational health services. Designated agencies should contact the Public Health Service directly on all matters dealing with the establishment and operation of these services.
( b ) Public Health Service should be consulted by the designated agency on such matters as types, amounts, and approximate cost of necessary equipment; the scope of the services to be provided if it is affected by the amount of space and number of building occupants; types and amounts of supplies, materials, medicines, etc., which should be stocked; and the approximate cost of personnel staffing in cases where this method of operation is chosen, etc. PHS should also be asked to develop and monitor standards under which each health unit would be operated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         609,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  340,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (60,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,554,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,517,529
<PP&E>                                       2,205,469
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,144,965)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,722,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,762,041
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,961,140
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,136,442)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,722,998
<SALES>                                      1,160,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,617,077
<CGS>                                          739,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,080,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,469,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             334,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,057,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,057,858)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,057,858)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.84)
        

</TABLE>
§ 401.20 Automatic Identification System. ( a ) Each of the following vessels must use an Automatic Identification System (AIS) transponder to transit the Seaway: ( 1 ) Each commercial vessel that requires pre-clearance in accordance with § 401.22 and has a 300 gross tonnage or greater, has a Length Over All (LOA) over 20 meters, or carries more than 50 passengers for hire; and
( 2 ) Each dredge, floating plant or towing vessel over 8 meters in length, except only each lead unit of combined and multiple units (tugs and tows).
( b ) Each vessel listed in paragraph (a) of this section must meet the following requirements to transit the Seaway: ( 1 ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Resolution MSC.74(69), Annex 3, Recommendation on Performance Standards for a Universal Shipborne AIS, as amended;
( 2 ) International Telecommunication Union, ITU-R Recommendation M.1371-5: 2014, Technical Characteristics For A Universal Shipborne AIS Using Time Division Multiple Access In The VHF Maritime Mobile Band, as amended;
( 3 ) International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61993-2 Ed.3, Maritime Navigation and Radio Communication Equipment and Systems—AIS—Part 2: Class A Shipborne Equipment of the Universal AIS—Operational and Performance Requirements, Methods of Test and Required Test Results, as amended;
( 4 ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Guidelines for Installation of Shipborne Automatic Identification System (AIS), NAV 48/18, 6 January 2003, as amended, and, for ocean vessels only, with a pilot plug, as specified in Section 3.2 of those Guidelines, installed close to the primary conning position in the navigation bridge and a power source accessible for the pilot's laptop computer; and
( 5 ) The Minimum Keyboard Display (MKD) shall be located as close as possible to the primary conning position and be visible;
( 6 ) Computation of AIS position reports using a Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS); or
( 7 ) The use of a temporary unit meeting the requirements of subparagraphs (b)(1) through (6) of this section is permissible; or
( 8 ) For each vessel with LOA less than 30 meters, the use of portable AIS compatible with the requirements of subparagraphs (b)(1) through (3) and subparagraphs (5) and (6) of this section is permissible.
[68 FR 9551, Feb. 28, 2003; 68 FR 11974, Mar. 13, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 12972, Mar. 17, 2005; 86 FR 15412, Mar. 23, 2021; 87 FR 12591, Mar. 7, 2022; 88 FR 14267, Mar. 8, 2023; 89 FR 15961, Mar. 6, 2024]
§ 102-3.140 What policies apply to advisory committee meetings? ( a ) The agency head for a discretionary or non-discretionary advisory committee established or utilized by that agency, or the chairperson for an independent Presidential advisory committee, must ensure that: ( 1 ) Each advisory committee meeting is held at a reasonable time and in a manner or place accessible to the public and includes consideration of affected communities, as appropriate, as well as facilities or technology that are readily accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities, consistent with the requirements set forth in relevant sections of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 794;
( 2 ) The physical meeting room is sufficient to accommodate advisory committee members, advisory committee or agency staff, and a reasonable number of interested members of the public. If electronic forums are used, agencies should opt for technology features that are compliant with relevant sections of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 794, accommodate advisory committee members, advisory committee or agency staff, and allow for maximum participation by members of the public, as appropriate;
( 3 ) Any member of the public is permitted to file a written statement with the advisory committee, whether or not the statement is related to a specific meeting;
( 4 ) Any member of the public may speak to or otherwise address the advisory committee if the agency's guidelines so permit; and
( 5 ) Any advisory committee meeting conducted in whole or part through any electronic medium (such as a teleconference or through a virtual platform) meets the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) The Federal Register notices, agendas, and supporting materials should be posted on the agency advisory committee website (if one exists) as soon as they are available or at the time they are provided to the advisory committee members.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5538

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum

wage by $1 over 2 years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase

the minimum wage by $1 over 2 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Minimum Wage Act

5 of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

7 Paragraph (1) of section 6(a) of the Fair Labor

8 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)) is amended to

9 read as follows:
2

HR 5538 IH

1 ‘‘(1) except as otherwise provided in this sec2 tion. Not less than $5.15 an hour during the period

3 ending June 30, 2000, not less than $5.65 an hour

4 during the year beginning January 1, 2001, and not

5 less than $6.15 an hour beginning January 1,

6 2002;’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN,

Defendant.

Case No.: 22-CR-80173-AMC

JOINT SPEEDY TRIAL REPORT

The United States hereby files this joint speedy trial response having conferred with 

defense counsel of record. Regarding the status of speedy trial, the government states the 

following:

1. Date that WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN was arrested: November 2, 2022

Date that WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN appeared in SDFL: December 14, 2022

Total number of days elapsed, as of the June 12, 2023 trial date

since initial appearance in SDFL: 181

Total number of days tolled or excluded from speedy trial time

due to motions and trial continuances due to 1st motion 

to continue (denied at DE 29): 0

Total number of days tolled or excluded from speedy trial time

due to motions and trial continuances due to 2nd motion 

to continue (granted at DE 34): 118

Total number of days tolled or excluded from speedy trial time

due to motions and trial continuances due to 3rd motion 

to continue (granted at DE 47): 34

Elapsed Speedy Trial Time as of June 12, 2023: 29 days

Latest date on which case may be set for trial 

without additional tolling or excluding of time: July 24, 2023

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 139 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/30/2023 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted,

MARKENZY LAPOINTE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: s/ Gregory Schiller ____________ 

GREGORY SCHILLER

Assistant United States Attorney

Court Id No. A5501906

U.S. Attorney’s Office - SDFL

500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone: (561)209-1045

E-mail: gregory.schiller@usdoj.gov

By: s/Kyle Reynolds

KYLE REYNOLDS

TRIAL ATTORNEY

U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal Division

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section

Court ID # A5502872

1301 New York Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 616-2842

Email: kyle.reynolds@usdoj.gov

By: s/William Clayman

WILLIAM G. CLAYMAN

TRIAL ATTORNEY

U.S. Dept. of Justice, Criminal Division

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section

Court ID # A5502958

1301 New York Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 514-0040

Email: william.clayman@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 30, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing document with 

the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. 

s/ Gregory Schiller 

Gregory Schiller

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 139 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/30/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ENDO

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward J. Sweeney, as Principal Financial Officer of Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                                                                          
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/    EDWARD J.
SWEENEY                                                                 
|Name:  |  | Edward J. Sweeney                                                                        
|Title: |  | Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|       | 
|Date:  |  | March 2, 2009                                                                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to, and
will be retained by, Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5665 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5665

  To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
   1974 to adjust the monthly multiemployer plan benefit guaranteed 
                              thereunder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2000

  Mr. Quinn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
   1974 to adjust the monthly multiemployer plan benefit guaranteed 
                              thereunder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MULTIEMPLOYER PLAN BENEFITS GUARANTEED.

    (a) In General.--Section 4022A(c) of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1322a(c)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$5'' each place it appears in paragraph 
        (1) and inserting ``$11'';
            (2) by striking ``$15'' in paragraph (1)(A)(i) and 
        inserting ``$33''; and
            (3) by striking paragraphs (2), (5), and (6) and by 
        redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (2) and (3), 
        respectively.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to any multiemployer plan that has not received financial 
assistance (within the meaning of section 4261 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) within the 1-year period ending 
on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1




C.E.O.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE
ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.
  /s/
Michael A. Richardson
 ___________________________________
 Michael
A. Richardson
 Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
 American
Consumers, Inc.
   Date:  April
14, 2009
###### Editorial Note on Part 67

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

#### § 67.40-20 Charges invoiced to owner.

Charges to the owner for the cost of marking a structure by the Coast Guard shall be determined in accordance with Part 74 of this subchapter. All such charges shall be invoiced to the owner beginning with the date such marking is established and shall continue until notice is received by the District Commander that the structure has been removed, or until the owner has applied for and been issued a permit by the District Commander to establish and operate the required obstruction lights and/or sound signals or other markings required by this part.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37581-37582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Pension and Welfare Beneifts Administration


Working Group on Phased Retirement; Advisory Council on Employee 
Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans, Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 
Working Group assigned by the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and 
Pension Benefit Plans to study the issue of phased retirement with hold 
an open public meeting on Monday, July 17, 2000, in Room N-5437 A-D, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Second and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20210.
    The purpose of the open meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. to 
approximately noon, is for Working Group members to hear testimony 
regarding macroeconomic trends on workforce availability, experience 
with phased retirement programs and regulations concerning 
implementation of phased retirement plans.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to the topic by submitting 20 copies on or before July 10, 
2000, to Sharon Morrissey, Executive Secretary, ERISA Advisory Council, 
U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or representatives of organizations 
wishing to address the Working Group should forward their request to 
the Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 219-8753. Oral presentations 
will be limited to 10 minutes, but an extended statement may be 
submitted for the record. Individuals with disabilities, who need 
special accommodations, should contact Sharon Morrissey by July 10, at 
the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at the above 
address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record of the 
meeting if received on or before July 10.


[[Page 37582]]


    Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of June 2000.
Leslie B. Kramerich,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-15148 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M