alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5377

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend the limitation

on waivers granted under section 212(h) of that Act to aliens unlawfully

present in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 4, 2000

Mr. SMITH of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend

the limitation on waivers granted under section 212(h)

of that Act to aliens unlawfully present in the United

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON WAIVER OF INADMISSIBILITY

4 FOR CRIMINAL ALIENS UNLAWFULLY

5 PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 212(h) of the Immigra7 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(h)) is amended

8 by inserting before the final sentence the following:
2

•HR 5377 IH

1 ‘‘No waiver shall be granted under this subsection in the

2 case of any alien who is present in the United States after

3 the expiration of the period of stay authorized by the At4 torney General or is present in the United States without

5 being admitted or paroled if either the alien has been con6 victed of an aggravated felony committed in the United

7 States or the alien has not resided continuously in the

8 United States for a period of not less than 7 years imme9 diately preceding the date of initiation of proceedings to

10 remove the alien from the United States.’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) shall apply to waivers granted on or after

13 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 101-28.305 Prices of customer supply center items.

The selling price of a CSC item is an average price which is calculated automatically by the CSC computer at the time the item is ordered. Items stocked in CSCs that are obtained from GSA wholesale supply distribution facilities are input into the computer at the price in effect at the time of shipment from the facilities (this price is normally the price shown in the GSA Supply Catalog). Items stocked in CSCs that are not available from GSA wholesale supply distribution facilities but which are obtained from other Government supply sources or commercial sources are input into the computer at the invoice cost. Due to cost averaging, item prices listed in the CSC catalog may differ somewhat from the sale price for a particular transaction.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOperating system for a real-time multiprocessor propulsion system simulator.  User's manualThe NASA Lewis Research Center is developing and evaluating experimental hardware and software systems to help meet future needs for real-time, high-fidelity simulations of air-breathing propulsion systems. Specifically, the real-time multiprocessor simulator project focuses on the use of multiple microprocessors to achieve the required computing speed and accuracy at relatively low cost. Operating systems for such hardware configurations are generally not available. A real time multiprocessor operating system (RTMPOS) that supports a variety of multiprocessor configurations was developed at Lewis. With some modification, RTMPOS can also support various microprocessors. RTMPOS, by means of menus and prompts, provides the user with a versatile, user-friendly environment for interactively loading, running, and obtaining results from a multiprocessor-based simulator. The menu functions are described and an example simulation session is included to demonstrate the steps required to go from the simulation loading phase to the execution phase.Document ID19850009287Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsCole, G. L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1985Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberD-1998NASA-TP-2426NAS 1.60:2426Accession Number85N17596Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-40-74Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850009287.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 958.13 Sanctions. ( a ) *In general.* The Presiding Officer may sanction a person, including any party, attorney or representative, for: ( 1 ) Failing to comply with a lawful order or prescribed procedure;
( 2 ) Failing to prosecute or defend an action; or
( 3 ) Engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing.
( b ) *Reasonableness.* Any such sanction, including but not limited to those listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, shall reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.
( c ) *Failure to comply with an order.* When a party fails to comply with an order, including an order for taking a deposition, the production of evidence within the party's control, or a request for admission, the Presiding Officer may: ( 1 ) Draw an inference in favor of the requesting party with regard to the information sought;
( 2 ) Prohibit such party from introducing evidence concerning, or otherwise relying upon, testimony relating to the information sought;
( 3 ) Permit the requesting party to introduce secondary evidence concerning the information sought; and
( 4 ) Strike any part of the pleadings or other submissions of the party failing to comply with such request.
( d ) *Failure to prosecute or defend.* If a party fails to prosecute or defend an action under this part, the Presiding Officer may dismiss the action, or enter an order of default and an Initial Decision.
( e ) *Failure to file timely.* The Presiding Officer may refuse to consider any motion or other pleading, report, or response which is not filed in a timely fashion.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-23699-ALTMAN/Reid

OPPENHEIMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

PANDA IDX, LLC, 

Defendant.

________________________________________________/

ORDER

On December 19, 2022, the Court held a status conference. See Status Conference Minutes 

Entry [ECF No. 14]. For the reasons stated on the record during the status conference, the Court

hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows:

1. This case is STAYED for 30 days. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only. 

3. By January 19, 2023, the Defendant must file either a notice of appearance by new 

counsel or a motion for extension of time to comply with this ORDER. 

4. All pending deadlines and hearings are TERMINATED.

5. All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on December 20, 2022.

_________________________________

ROY K. ALTMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-23699-RKA Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/21/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 102-3.55 What rules apply to the duration of an advisory committee? ( a ) An advisory committee automatically terminates two years after its date of establishment unless: ( 1 ) The statutory authority used to establish the advisory committee provides a different duration or termination, either stated in or implied by operation of the statute;
( 2 ) The President or agency head determines that the advisory committee has fulfilled the purpose for which it was established and terminates the advisory committee earlier;
( 3 ) The President or agency head determines that the advisory committee is no longer carrying out the purpose for which it was established and terminates the advisory committee earlier; or
( 4 ) The President or agency head renews the advisory committee not later than two years after its date of establishment, renewal, or reestablishment in accordance with § 102-3.60. If the President or an agency needs an advisory committee that was terminated, it can be reestablished in accordance with § 102-3.60.
( b ) When an advisory committee terminates, the agency shall notify the Secretariat of the effective date of the termination.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

for the 

Southern District of Florida 

JonPaul Marcel Nadeau 

Plaintiff(s) 

v. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

Atlantic Smart Integration, LLC dba Atlantic Smart 

Technologies 

Defendant(s) 

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION 

To. (D ... .3 t' d d'd .

1 Atlantic Smart Integration, LLC dba Atlantic Smart Technologies

. e1enuan s name an a ress/ . . . c/o Registered Agent: Matthew T. Weinstein 

361 0 Gardens Pkwy 

Unit 102A 

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 3341 0 

A lawsuit has been filed against you. 

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it)-or 60 days if you 

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) -you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney,

whose name and address are: Craig A. Wirth 

SRIPLAW 

21301 Powerline Road 

Suite 100 

Boca Raton, FL 33433 

craig.wirth@sriplaw.com 

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court. 

CLERK OF COURT 

Date: 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk 

Nov 7, 2022 s/ A. Alonso

9:22-cv-81740-AMC

Case 9:22-cv-81740-AMC Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2022 Page 1 of 1 Case 9:22-cv-81740-AMC Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:22-cv-81740-AMC Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 88.03 Definitions.

The terms used in this part have the same meaning as the terms defined in part 83 of this subchapter.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AMERCO (the "Registrant") on
      Form
      10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason A. Berg, Chief
      Financial Officer of AMERCO certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




AMERCO,


a
      Nevada
      corporation




/s/
      Jason A. Berg


Jason
      A.
      Berg


*Chief
      Financial Officer*




Date:
      August 8, 2005
gden-ex101_116.htm



Exhibit 10.1

THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Third Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 5th day of August, 2019, by and between Charles Protell (the “Executive”), and Golden Entertainment, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, including its subsidiaries and Affiliates (collectively, the “Company”).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company previously entered into that certain Employment Agreement made and entered into as of the 15th day of November, 2016, as amended by the First Amendment to Employment Agreement made and entered into as of the 10th day of March, 2017, as further amended by the Second Amendment to Employment Agreement made and entered into as of the 14th day of March, 2018 (together, the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Executive currently is employed at-will by the Company; and

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to enter into this Amendment to modify certain terms of the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants and the respective undertakings of the Company and the Executive set forth below, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1.Amendments.

 


	
 
	
a)
	
Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the amount “Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000)” from such Section and by replacing the same with the amount “Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000)”.




 


	
 
	
b)
	
The first sentence of Section 8(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "The Executive shall serve as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company."




 

2.Status of Agreement.  Except to the limited extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement and its terms and conditions remain in full force and effect and unchanged by this Amendment.  Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed such terms in the Agreement.

 

3.Counterparts and Facsimile Signatures.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts hereof, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  Facsimile signatures are permitted and shall be binding for purposes of this Amendment.  


 

 

 





 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and, pursuant to the due authorization of its Board, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf, all as of the day and year first written above.


	
	
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.:


	
By: /s/ BLAKE L. SARTINI

	
Name:  Blake L. Sartini

	
Its: Chief Executive Officer




 


	
	
EXECUTIVE:

	
By:/s/ CHARLES PROTELL

	
      Charles Protell

	
 




 

 

2
§ 101-25.302-5 Carpeting. ( a ) Carpeting is authorized for use where it can be justified over other types of floor covering on the basis of cost, safety, insulation, acoustical control, the degree of interior decoration required, or the need to maintain an environment commensurate with the purpose for which the space is allocated.
( b ) In connection with new construction or alteration of space, if it is known that the area will eventually require carpeting, then resilient floor covering should be omitted and the carpeting installed initially.
[43 FR 18673, May 2, 1978, as amended at 49 FR 48546, Dec. 13, 1984]
#### § 101-4.130 Effect of employment opportunities.

The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated because employment opportunities in any occupation or profession are or may be more limited for members of one sex than for members of the other sex.
#### § 965.6 Comments by parties.

Within 10 days of receipt of the other party's initial submission under § 965.5, each party may file with the Recorder an additional statement or rebuttal argument setting forth in detail its disagreements, if any, with its opponent's initial submission. Such rebuttal may include any additional documents relevant to the dispute.

[76 FR 15219, Mar. 21, 2011]
#### § 102-117.105 What does best value mean when routing a shipment?

Best value to your agency when routing a shipment means using the mode or individual TSP that provides satisfactory service with the best combination of service factors and price that meets the agency's requirements. A lower price may not be the best value if the service offered fails to meet the requirements of the shipment.

[75 FR 51394, Aug. 20, 2010]
§ 101-28.202-2 Cancellation of cross-servicing arrangements. ( a ) Accepted requests may be canceled by the requesting agency prior to delivery of supplies, material, and equipment to the storage activity when logistical developments make cancellation necessary or cancellation is in the best interest of the Government. The agency which accepted the request shall be informed of the cancellation in writing as soon as possible.
( b ) Cancellation of arrangements in facilities to be inactivated or disposed of by an operating agency may be made as provided for in the GSA/DOD agreement. Also, after supplies, material, and equipment have been received at a storage activity, cancellation may be made when unforeseen emergencies arise which justify such cancellation. Advice of these necessary cancellations shall be in writing to the agency owning the material sufficiently in advance to allow the owning agency the maximum amount of time to make other arrangements for their property.
( c ) When a facility in which cross-servicing is being accomplished is to be transferred from an operating agency to another agency, the operating agency shall inform the agency owning the property at least 90 days before the transfer. The agency owning the property shall negotiate with the agency gaining the facility for continued cross-servicing of the property at the facility. The agency gaining the facility shall continue the cross-servicing arrangements unless they are contrary to the best interest of the Government.
[42 FR 2317, Jan. 11, 1977]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5515 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5515

To limit the use of eminent domain under the Natural Gas Act to acquire 
                     certain State-owned property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 2000

Mr. Pascrell (for himself, Mr. Andrews, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Franks of New 
 Jersey, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Holt, and Mr. Rothman) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To limit the use of eminent domain under the Natural Gas Act to acquire 
                     certain State-owned property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 7(h) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717f(h)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following: ``Property may not be acquired 
under this subsection if the property owner is a State and the property 
is reserved for the purpose of preserving open space, unless the State 
has agreed to the application of this subsection to the property.''.
                                 <all>
```
ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 31.2

                       Section 302 Certification

I, Nathan S. Eckhart, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allen Organ
     Company;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
     necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
     under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
     the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
     financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
     cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
     this report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
     for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
     (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
     registrant and have:
   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
      such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
      our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
      to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;
   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our
      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
      and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
      report based on such evaluation; and
   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
      the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
     based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
     reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
     registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     function):
   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial
      reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
      registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and
   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting.

/s/NATHAN S. ECKHART
Nathan S. Eckhart
Chief Financial Officer
November 6, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6377

TERRY WENDELL COPELAND,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge; Jillyn K.

Schulze, Magistrate Judge. (CA-97-1211-AMD)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 23, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Wendell Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry Wendell Copeland seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Copeland v. Corcoran, No. CA-97-1211-AMD

(D. Md. Mar. 31, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED