alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 966.9 Opportunity for oral hearing.

An oral hearing shall be held in the sole discretion of the Hearing Official. An oral hearing includes an in-person hearing, a telephonic hearing, or a hearing by video conference. When the Hearing Official determines that an oral hearing shall not be conducted, the decision shall be based solely on written submissions. The Hearing Official shall arrange for the recording and transcription of an oral hearing, which shall serve as the official record of the hearing. The unexcused absence of a party at the time and place set for hearing may not be occasion for delay at the discretion of the Hearing Official. In the event of such absence, the hearing may proceed without the participation of the absent party.

[77 FR 65106, Oct. 25, 2012]
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.204-3 Special benefits.

An individual shall not be deemed subjected to discrimination by reason of his exclusion from benefits limited by Federal law to individuals of a particular race, color, or national origin different from his.
§ 102-3.115 What are the responsibilities and functions of an agency CMO? In addition to implementing the provisions of sec. 8(b) of the Act (codified at 5 U.S.C. 1007(b)), the CMO will carry out all responsibilities delegated by the agency head and manage the agency FACA program. Management includes consulting with the Secretariat on Federal advisory committees, as delegated by the agency head; tracking charter establishments, renewals, re-establishments, mergers, amendments, and terminations; coordinating the agency Annual Comprehensive Review within their agency and with the Secretariat; providing training for agency staff supporting the FACA program; working with GFOs, as appropriate, and DFOs; attending GSA Government-wide FACA training and recommending this training to agency staff, as appropriate; and attending Interagency Committee on Federal Advisory Committee Management meetings. The CMO should create and maintain an agency website to further the public's understanding of the agency's FACA program. The CMO also should ensure that secs. 10(b), 12(a), and 13 of the Act (codified at 5 U.S.C. 1009(b), 1011(a), and 1012, respectively) are implemented by the agency to provide for appropriate recordkeeping. Records to be kept by the CMO include, but are not limited to— ( a ) *Charter and membership documentation.* A set of filed charters for each advisory committee and membership lists for each advisory committee and subcommittee;
( b ) *Annual comprehensive review.* Copies of the information provided as the agency's portion of the annual comprehensive review of Federal advisory committees, prepared according to § 102-3.175(b);
( c ) *Agency guidelines.* Agency guidelines maintained and updated on committee management operations and procedures; and
( d ) *Closed meeting determinations.* Agency determinations to close or partially close advisory committee meetings required by § 102-3.105(f).
# New Recipient Contact Form

(This form is to be sent to newrecipientforms@americorps.gov)

**GRANTEE INFORMATION**
§ 101-4.425 Counseling and use of appraisal and counseling materials. ( a ) *Counseling.* A recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex in the counseling or guidance of students or applicants for admission.
( b ) *Use of appraisal and counseling materials.* A recipient that uses testing or other materials for appraising or counseling students shall not use different materials for students on the basis of their sex or use materials that permit or require different treatment of students on such basis unless such different materials cover the same occupations and interest areas and the use of such different materials is shown to be essential to eliminate sex bias. Recipients shall develop and use internal procedures for ensuring that such materials do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Where the use of a counseling test or other instrument results in a substantially disproportionate number of members of one sex in any particular course of study or classification, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination in the instrument or its application.
( c ) *Disproportion in classes.* Where a recipient finds that a particular class contains a substantially disproportionate number of individuals of one sex, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination on the basis of sex in counseling or appraisal materials or by counselors.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
§ 102-192.130 What are your general responsibilities as an agency mail manager? In addition to carrying out the responsibilities discussed above, you should— ( a ) Establish written policies and procedures to provide timely and cost effective dispatch and delivery of mail and materials;
( b ) Ensure agency-wide awareness and compliance with standards and operational procedures established by all service providers used by the agency;
( c ) Set policies for expedited mail, mass mailings, mailing lists, and couriers;
( d ) Implement cost savings through: ( 1 ) Consolidating and presorting wherever practical, for example, internal and external mail, and consolidation of agency-wide mail operations and official mail facilities; and
( 2 ) Reducing the volume of agency to agency mail whenever possible.
( e ) Develop and direct agency programs and plans for proper and cost effective use of transportation, equipment, and supplies used for mail;
( f ) Ensure that all facility and program level mail personnel receive appropriate training and certifications to successfully perform their assigned duties;
( g ) Promote professional certification for mail managers and mail center employees;
( h ) Ensure that expedited mail service providers are used only when authorized by the Private Express Statutes, 39 U.S.C. 601-606;
( i ) Establish written policies and procedures to minimize incoming and outgoing personal mail;
( j ) Provide guidance to agency representatives who develop correspondence or design mailing materials including Business Reply Mail, letterhead, and mail piece design;
( k ) Represent the agency in its relations with service providers, other agency mail managers, and GSA's Office of Government-wide Policy;
( l ) Ensure agency policy incorporates Federal hazardous materials requirements set forth in 49 CFR parts 100-185;
( m ) Ensure agency sustainable activities become part of the mail program by incorporating strategies in accordance with *Executive Order 13514* of October 5, 2009, “Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance”. Section 8 describes the Agency Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan; and
( n ) Ensure safety and security requirements specified in §§ 102-192.70 through 102-192.80 are fulfilled.
#### Peter v. Butler.

May, 1829.

(Absent Brooke, P„ and Carr, J.*)

Foreign - Attachments — Claim on Contract Made Out of State, † — A claim, arising on contract of bailment made out of Virginia, against a non-resident of Virginia, is a claim for debt, for which a foreign attachment in chancery lies.

Butler, a farmer of Jefferson county, Virginia, had deposited with Peter, a merchant of Georgetown in the district of Columbia, in a warehouse kept there by him for the storage of flour, a parcel of flour, to be kept on storage, and re-delivered on demand: but before the flour was demanded, Peter’s warehouse, with whatever flour was in it at the time, was accidentally consumed by fire. And a dispute arose between the parties, which should bear the loss? whether Peter had fairly performed the contract of bailment on his part? and whether or no he was bound, under the peculiar circumstances of the case, to account to Butler for the value of the flour, which he had deposited with *him on storage? Hereupon, Butler, finding persons in Virginia indebted to Peter, proceeded by way of foreign attachment in chancery (1 Rev. Code, ch. 123, p. 474,) exhibiting his bill, in the superiour court of chancery of Winchester, against Peter, as an absent debtor, and against his debtors in Virginia as garnishees, praying a decree for the value of the flour, against Peter, and the attachment and application of the moneys due him in Virginia, to satisfy the claim. Peter, besides making strenuous defence upon the merits, objected to the jurisdiction of the court of chancery. The chancellor sustained the jurisdiction ; and, upon" the merits, decreed Butler the amount of his claim. And Peter appealed to this court.

The cause was argued here by Heigh for the appellant, and by Wickham and Stanard for the appellee.

The facts of the case were much controverted, and several interesting questions of law were discussed, both in the court of chancery, and here: but, in the view of this court, the cause turned wholly on the questions of fact. These the court decided against the appellant, and affirmed the decree.

*

Carr, J.. did not sit, because he had decided the cause in the court of chancery.

†

 Attachment — Unliquidated Damages. — For the proposition that an attachment will lie for unliquidated damages the principal case is cited in Dunlop v. Keith. 1 Leigh 432; Zerega v. McDonald, 30 Fed. Gas. 931. The principal case is also cited in Bank of U. S. v. Merchants’ Bank of Baltimore, 1 Bob. 586. See monographic *note*on “Attachments” appended to Lancaster v. Wilson, 27 Gratt. 624.

The only point of law involved in the decision, was the question of jurisdiction. This court concurred with the chancellor, that a claim, arising on a contract of bailment made out of Virginia, against a nonresident of Virginia, is such a claim for debt, for which the foreign attachment in chancery is a proper remedy.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Defense intelligence history**
 
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
 
SuDoc Number:D 5.214:
Item Number:0315-F-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000650127
 
December 19, 2019
#### § 101-4.605 Enforcement procedures.

The investigative, compliance, and enforcement procedural provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) (“Title VI”) are hereby adopted and applied to these Title IX regulations. These procedures may be found at 41 CFR part 101-6, subpart 101-6.2.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15160]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  June 22, 2000 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   
    1. Agenda for future meeting: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-828 (Final) (Bulk Acetylsalicylic Acid (Aspirin) 
from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission will transmit its 
determination to the Secretary of Commerce on June 30, 2000.)
    5. Inv. No. 731-TA-718 (Review) (Glycine from China)--briefing and 
vote. (The Commission will transmit its determination to the Secretary 
of Commerce on June 30, 2000.)
    6. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-253 and 731-TA-132, 252, 271, 276-277, 296, 
409-410, 532-534, and 536-537 (Review) (Certain Pipe and Tube from 
Argentina, Brazil, Canada, India, Korea, Mexico, Singapore, Taiwan, 
Thailand, Turkey, and Venezuela)--briefing and vote. (The Commission 
will transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on July 
26, 2000.)
    7. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 12, 2000.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15160 Filed 6-12-00; 1:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
Case 31 — ¡Motion by Loins Oberdorfer to Correct Mandate Awarding Nina L. P. White Damages Against Him in a Case Appealed to the Court of Appeals.

#### Oberdorfer *v.*White.

Appeal — Judgment—Costs—Damages—Assessment.

Civil Code, see. 764, providing that 10 per cent, damages shall be allowed on the amount superseded against the ¡appellant on the affirmance of a judgment for the payment of money, the collection of which has been superseded, does not apply where the only pecuniary relief afforded by the judgment appealed from was an award of the costs of the action.

*292LE'IBER & LINCOLN, por appellant.

In this proceeding a judgment was entered in the lower court reforming a deed which was superseded and appealed and affirmed, on February *4,*1904, and a mandate was issued awarding 10 per cent, damages on the costs, and this motion is made to correct said mandate. We submit that it was error to award a mandate for damages in this case, under the settled rule of this court, and we ask that it be corrected in so far as it awards damages. Bergen v. Farmers & Traders’ Bank, 9 Rep., 194; Worsham v. Lancaster, 104 Ky., 813; Wade v. First Nat. Bank, 1 Bush, 697.

SAMUEL AVRITT, por appellee.

We insist that this motion can not be sustained:

1. Because the amount involved is so small that the court will not consider it;

2. Because this court has no authority to correct a mandate issued at a previous ter

3. Because the mandate is proper.

AUTHORITIES.

Civil Code, sec. 764; Cockrell v. Mize, 11 Bush, 637; Ky. Stat., see. 2220; Calfin v. Kelling, 6 Rep., 510; Cornwall v. Fletcher, 9 Rep., 403; Bergen v. Farmers *&*Traders’ Bank, 9 Rep., 194; Southern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Best. 8 Rep., 610.

Opinion op the court by

JUDGE HOBSON

Sustaining Motion.

Appellee obtained a judgment in the Jefferson circuit court adjudging a deed executed by ber to appellant to be a mortgage. He appealed from that judgment, with supersedeas to this court, and the judgment was affirmed. Oberdorfer ■v. White, 78 S. W., 436, 25 Ky. Law Rep., 1629. The clerk entered up a judgment affirming the judgment appealed from, with damages. A motion is now made to correct the mandate in so far as it awards damages. Section 764 of the Civil Code provides that 10 per cent, damages on the amount superseded shall be awarded against the appellant upon the affirmance of a judgment for the payment of *293money, the collection of which has been superseded. The only judgment for money in favor of appellee was the judg* ment for costs in the action. It has been the uniform rule of the court not to adjudge damages on costs. It was so held in Handley v. Russell, 8 Ky., 152, and this rule has been uniformly maintained by the court since.

The motion to correct the mandate is therefore sustained.
#### § 101-26.301-2 Issue of used, repaired, and rehabilitated items in serviceable condition.

Stock items returned to GSA under the provisions of subpart 101-27.5 will be reissued to all requisitioning activities without distinction between new, used, repaired, or rehabilitated items in serviceable condition. Requisitioning agencies will be billed for these items at the current GSA selling price.

[38 FR 28566, Oct. 15, 1973]
###### Editorial Note on Part 67

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

#### § 67.05-20 Minimum lighting requirements.

The obstruction lighting requirements prescribed in this part are the minimum requirements only and shall not preclude the maintainer from making application for authorization to establish more lights, or lights of greater intensity than required to be visible at the distances prescribed: *Provided,* That the prescribed characteristics of color and flash duration are adhered to.
§ 101-26.102-2 Utilization by military agencies. Military activities shall utilize the buying services of GSA when: ( a ) GSA has agreed with the Secretary of Defense, or with the Secretary of a military department in connection with the requirements of that department, to perform such buying services; and
( b ) The items involved are not properly obtainable from GSA stock or Federal Supply Schedules.
[29 FR 15610, Nov. 20, 1964, as amended at 36 FR 17423, Aug. 31, 1971]
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333 54378 and 333 128232 on Forms S-8 and Registration StatementNos. 333 101957 and 333 128231 on Forms S-3 of our reports dated March 12, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption by the Company of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Shared-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006), andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10 K of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Certified Public Accountants 

 

Tampa, Florida 

March 12, 2007
#### § 102-37.160 Must GSA approve amendments or modifications to the plan?

Yes, GSA must approve amendments or modifications to the plan.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8580
ROY ANTHONY SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN A. HOLLAND, JR., M.D., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-819) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roy Anthony Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Eugene Ornoff, PENDER & COWARD, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on May 22, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on Dec. 19, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore grant Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal. We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37805-37806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15230]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications 
Systems (1196).
    Date/Time: June 21, 2000; 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Place: Room 380; National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Marija Ilic, Program Director, Control, 
Networks and Computational Intelligence, Division of Electrical and 
Communications Systems, Room 675, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1339.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate ``Regular Research'' proposals as 
part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposal being reviewed includes 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data; such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.
    Reason for Late Notice: This notice is late due to difficulty in 
scheduling.

[[Page 37806]]

    Note: Closed portions are proper under Sunshine Act exemptions 
cited. The CMO's signature on this Notice is the required 
determination.

    Dated: June 12, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-15230 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
-cr-06236-WPD Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2000 P
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.209 Compliance information.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2001.

In connection with the Annual Report of OSK CAPITAL III CORP.(the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Francis Mailhot,
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

Dated:  May 3, 2005

        /s/ Francis Mailhot
        ------------------------
        Francis Mailhot
        Chief Accounting Officer