alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 777.27 Last resort housing. ( a ) *Basic Determination to Provide Last Resort Housing.* A displaced person cannot be required to move from his or her dwelling unless at least one comparable replacement dwelling is made available to him or her which is within his or her financial means. When such comparable replacement dwelling is not available, additional measures may be taken to provide for “last resort” housing for eligible displaced persons.
( b ) *Basic Rights of Persons to be Displaced.* The provisions of this section do not deprive any displaced person of any rights the person may have under these regulations such as the right to accept the maximum replacement housing payment available under these regulations and to move to a decent, safe and sanitary replacement dwelling even if such dwelling is beyond the person's financial means.
( c ) *Methods of Providing Replacement Housing.* The Postal Service has broad latitude in implementing this section, but implementation must be on a reasonable cost basis. The Postal Service may provide last resort housing using the following methods: ( 1 ) Rehabilitation of and/or additions to an existing replacement dwelling.
( 2 ) The construction of a new replacement dwelling.
( 3 ) The provision of a direct loan which requires regular amortization or deferred repayment. Terms of such loan will be at the discretion of the Postal Service.
( 4 ) A replacement housing payment in excess of the $5,250 and $22,500 limitations contained in § 777.24. A rental subsidy under this section may be provided in installments.
( 5 ) The relocation and any needed rehabilitation of a replacement dwelling.
( 6 ) The purchase or lease of land and/or a replacement dwelling by the Postal Service and subsequent sale or lease to, or exchange with, a displaced person.
( 7 ) The removal of barriers to the handicapped.
( 8 ) Any other method determined by the Postal Service to be reasonable.
( d ) *Proof of Financial Need.* Last Resort Housing benefits exceeding the limitations under § 777.24(b)(2) and § 777.24(e)(2) will not be paid unless required to provide housing within the displaced person's financial means. To establish financial means, the displaced person must furnish the Postal Service proof of gross monthly income through income tax returns, certified financial statements or other reasonable evidence which the Postal Service determines is satisfactory.
[51 FR 6983, Feb. 27, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 48029, Dec. 17, 1987]
Sector 22: Utilities: Industry Series: Preliminary Summary Statistics for the United States: 2007 These 

data are 

preliminar

y and are 

subject to 

change; 

they will 

be 

supersede

d by data 

released 

in later 

data files. 

Includes 

only 

establish

ments of 

firms with 

payroll. 

Data 

based on 

the 2007 

Economic 

Census. 

For 

informatio

n on 

confidenti

2007 NAICS code Meaning of 2007 NAICS code Footnote identifier Number of establishments Revenue ($1,000) Annual payroll ($1,000) First-quarter payroll ($1,000) Number of paid employees for pay period inSales, receipts, or revenue from a

2211 Electric power generation, transmission and distribution 9,642 ######## ######## ######## 515,335 0.1

22111 Electric power generation 1,982 ######## ######## 3,470,814 128,406 0.1

221111 Hydroelectric power generation316 2,236,270 271,135 80,099 3,795 0.4

221112 Fossil fuel electric power generation 1,270 ######## 7,279,832 2,086,658 82,453 0.1

221113 Nuclear electric power generation 74 ######## 3,689,025 1,134,464 34,469 0

221119 Other electric power generation322 5,614,638 604,369 169,593 7,689 0.3

22112 Electric power transmission, control, and distribution 7,660 ######## ######## 9,556,942 386,929 0.1

221121 Electric bulk power transmission and control 75 4,064,562 417,483 122,271 4,939 0

221122 Electric power distribution 7,585 ######## ######## 9,434,671 381,990 0.1

2212 Natural gas distribution 2,247 ######## 5,898,600 1,751,666 81,682 0.2

22121 Natural gas distribution 2,247 ######## 5,898,600 1,751,666 81,682 0.2

221210 Natural gas distribution 2,247 ######## 5,898,600 1,751,666 81,682 0.2

2213 Water, sewage and other systems 4,661 9,941,261 2,001,986 507,933 42,717 2.5

22131 Water supply and irrigation systems 3,920 7,725,206 1,617,449 413,518 34,461 2.7

221310 Water supply and irrigation systems 3,920 7,725,206 1,617,449 413,518 34,461 2.7

22132 Sewage treatment facilities 681 1,287,400 290,961 69,857 6,839 2.9

221320 Sewage treatment facilities 681 1,287,400 290,961 69,857 6,839 2.9
22133 Steam and air-conditioning supply 60 928,655 93,576 24,558 1,417 0.2

221330 Steam and air-conditioning supply 60 928,655 93,576 24,558 1,417 0.2 Source: 

U.S. 

Census 

Bureau, 

2007 

Economic 

Census

Note: The 

data in 

this file 

are based 

on the 

2007 

Economic 

Census. 

To 

maintain 

confidenti

ality, the 

Census 

Bureau 

suppresse

s data to 

protect 

the 

identity of 

any 

business 
Sales, receipts, or revenue estimated (%)

0.4

0.7

2.4

0.6

0

3.4

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

3.1

3.2

3.2

4.5

4.5
0.3

0.3
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3231]


State of Mississippi

    Union County and the contiguous counties of Benton, Lafayette, Lee, 
Marshall, Pontotoc, Prentiss, and Tippah in the State of Mississippi 
constitute a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and 
tornadoes that occurred on January 3-4, 2000. Applications for loans 
for physical damage caused by this disaster may be filed until the 
close of business on March 13, 2000 and for economic injury until the 
close of business on October 11, 2000 at the address listed below or 
other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 
30308.
    The interest rates are:

For Physical Damage

    Homeowners with credit available elsewhere--7.500%
    Homeowners without credit available elsewhere--3.750%
    Businesses with credit available elsewhere--8.000%
    Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit available 
elsewhere--4.000%
    Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit available 
elsewhere--6.750%

For Economic Injury

    Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit 
available elsewhere--4.000%
    The numbers assigned to this disaster are 323112 for physical 
damage and 9G4000 for economic injury.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: January 11, 2000.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-1518 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-CR-20521-RNS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. 

THEODORE FARNSWORTH and 

J. MITCHELL LOWE

 

Defendants. 

 / 

UNITED STATES’ FOURTH RESPONSE TO THE STANDING DISCOVERY ORDERS 

The United States hereby files its fourth response to the Standing Discovery Orders (ECF 

Nos. 8 and 9) as to Defendants Theodore Farnsworth and J. Michell Lowe (the “Defendants”) and 

hereby notifies the Court and all interested parties that as of May 12, 2023, the following 

supplemental discovery has been produced to the Defendants: 

Description Beginning Bates Range Ending Bates Range

No Records Responses DOJ-PROD21-0000000001 DOJ-PROD21-0000000008 

Screenshots of Website URLs for

Previously Produced Videos DOJ-PROD21-0000000009 DOJ-PROD21-0000000085 

Business Records Certification DOJ-PROD21-0000000086 DOJ-PROD21-0000000086 

Published Analyst Reports on 

HMNY DOJ-PROD21-0000000087 DOJ-PROD21-0000000260 

Email Containing Website URLs 

for Podcast and Interview DOJ-PROD21-0000000261 DOJ-PROD21-0000000261 

Proffer Agreements DOJ-PROD21-0000000262 DOJ-PROD21-0000000297 

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 1 of 3
2 

The United States recognizes that its obligation to provide discovery is of a continuing 

nature and will supplement this response if and when it obtains additional evidence and materials. 

Respectfully submitted,

 GLENN S. LEON

 CHIEF, FRAUD SECTION

CRIMINAL DIVISION

 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

 

 By: /s/ Lauren Archer 

 Lauren Archer 

 Christopher Fenton 

 Matthew Reilly

Trial Attorneys

 Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 (Archer) 

 United States Department of Justice

 Criminal Division, Fraud Section

 1400 New York Ave., NW 

 Washington, DC 20005 

 Tel: (202) 538-3859 

 Email: Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov 

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 15, 2023, the foregoing was filed and served on all counsel of 

record using the CM/ECF system.

 /s/ Lauren Archer 

 Lauren Archer

 Trial Attorney

 Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 

 United States Department of Justice

 Criminal Division, Fraud Section

 1400 New York Ave., NW 

 Washington, DC 20005 

 Tel: (202) 538-3859 

 Email: Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov 

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2023 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS   Document 92   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2024   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS   Document 92   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2024   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS   Document 92   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2024   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:22-cr-20423-RNS   Document 92   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2024   Page 4 of 4
#### § 102-37.190 What records must a SASP maintain on authorized screeners?

You must maintain a current record of all individuals authorized to screen for your SASP, including their names, addresses, telephone numbers, qualifications to screen, and any additional identifying information such as driver's license or social security numbers. In the case of donee screeners, you should place such records in the donee's eligibility file and review for currency each time a periodic review of the donee's file is undertaken.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                    OST-2000-7434.                

*Date Filed:*                    May 30, 2000.                

*Parties:*                    Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                    CTC COMP 0284 dated 26 May 2000, Expedited Resolution 002kk, Special Amending Resolution (Except USA/US Territories), Intended effective date: 1 August 2000.                

*Docket Number:*                    OST-2000-7435.                

*Date Filed:*                    May 30, 2000.                

*Parties:*                    Members of the International Air Transport Association.                

*Subject:*                    PTC31 SOUTH 0084 dated 26 May 2000, Expedited TC31 South Pacific Resolutions r1-r7, Intended effective date: 1 July 2000.                 

Dorothy Y. Beard, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 00-15085 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### WILLIAM ROOT, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD J. BROWN, Defendant.

*Evidence—Admissions*— *admissibility of other statements made at same time by same pei-son.*

In order to give in evidence against a party his admissions, it is necessary to examine the party first as to whether or not he has made such admissions. Whatever was said by the same person, in the same conversation, that would in any way qualify or explain the statement proved to have been made by him, is admissible in his favor. *(Rouse*v. *Whited,*25 N. Y., 170.) And although the party alleged to have made the admissions is asked by the adverse counsel, *798before proof is given of such statement by him, whether he so stated or not, he is not thereby precluded from giving evidence, after the proof of such admissions on his part has been made, of other statements made by him in the same conversation.

Exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance at the General. Term.

The ■ action was in ejectment, and the issue was as to whether or not the plaintiff had delivered a deed of the premises in dispute to the grantor of the defendant.

*Betts & Grover,*for the plaintiff.

*Hughes & Northup,*for the defendant.

Opinion by

Leabned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J.

New trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15272]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP98-54-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

June 12, 2000.
    On May 23, 2000, an informal settlement conference was held in the 
above-docketed filing respecting the Kansas ad valorem issues. At that 
conference, the participants agreed to hold a second informal 
settlement conference on June 29, 2000. The conference will begin at 
10:30 and the location will be at the offices of the Attorney General, 
1525 Sherman Street, Denver, Colorado 80203. The specific meeting room 
will be posted at the Attorney General's offices.
    All interested parties in the above dockets are requested to attend 
the informal settlement conference. If a party has any questions 
respecting the conference, please call Richard Miles, the Director of 
the Dispute Resolution Service. His telephone number is 1 877 FERC ADR 
(337-2237) or 202-208-0702 and his e-mail address is 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#16647f757e776472387b7f7a7365567073647538707372386365"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3918a808b829187cd8e8a8f8690a385869180cd858687cd9690">[email protected]</span></a>.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15272 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### EVANDER S. VAN LIEW and another, Administrators, Appellants, *v.*STEPHEN V. R. JOHNSON and others, Impleaded, Respondents.

*Wra/udulent contract&emdash;remedy of parly defrauded.*

The remedy of a party defrauded is either to affirm the contract and sue for the damages occasioned by the fraud, or to disaffirm the contract and to sue for the recovery of whatever has been received under the contract by the other party.

He can pursue the latter remedy only on condition that he has restored, or offered to restore, all that he has himself received under the contract.

Appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in this action.

*McDonald &*Rose, for the appellants.

*Thaddeus*Bodine, for the respondents.

Opinion by

Gilbert, J.

Order appealed from affirmed with costs, with leave to the plaintiff to amend in twenty days on payment of costs.
Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Douglas M. Whitenack, as Chief Financial Officer of Allcity
Insurance Company (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  May 15, 2003
                                                     /s/ Douglas M. Whitenack
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Douglas M. Whitenack
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
528 P.2d 680

#### Dick D. ANDERSEN and Nancy L. Andersen, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bob D. BURNS and Marie Ellen Burns, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents, v. Nonna SOMMERFELD, d/b/a Sommerfeld Agency, Cross-Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11341.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Nov. 22, 1974.

*337Stephen Bistline and Gary ' A. Finney, Law Officers of Steve Bistline, Sandpoint, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Hardy C. Lyons, Lyons, & Hofmeister, Sandpoint, for defendants-respondents.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-appellants Andersen sought damages for defendants-respondents Burns’ alleged breach of an agreement to purchase real property. The Burnses answered and prayed for judgment against cross-defendant Sommerfeld for the return of money paid her as plaintiffs’ real estate agent. Sommerfeld answered, admitting that she so held the moneys. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case, plaintiffs’ causes of action' pertinent to this appeal were dismissed and judgment in the amount of $1,310.00 was rendered in favor of Burns and against Sommerfeld.

The “Agreement to Purchase” was a printed form to which Mr. Andersen had signed his name and that of his wife. Appellants contended that Andersen placed his wife’s name on the Agreement under an express power of attorney. The strictures of I.C. § 32-912 governing the conveyance of community property were not observed; Thomas v. Stevens, 69 Idaho 100, 203 P.2d 597 (1949), and the requirements of I.C. § 55-602 regarding instruments transferring real property when executed by an attorney in fact were not satisfied. Although argued by appellants, the elements of estoppel set forth in Tew v. Manwaring, 94 Idaho 50, 480 P.2d 896 (1971) are not present here. Judgment of the district court is affirmed. Costs to respondents.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5454 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5454

                For the relief of Louise Ingrid Wallace.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 11, 2000

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Louise Ingrid Wallace.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR LOUISE INGRID WALLACE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Louise Ingrid Wallace shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Louise Ingrid Wallace enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Louise Ingrid Wallace, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Louise Ingrid 
Wallace shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
`
 

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with this Yearly Report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard F. Govatski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Richard F. Govatski

Richard F. Govatski

Chief Executive Officer

 

March 31, 2008

 
`