alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 101-25.401 General.

This subpart prescribes minimum replacement standards to be used by executive agencies desiring to replace specified types of items indicated in this subpart. Executive agencies shall retain items which are in usable workable condition even though the standard permits replacement, provided the item can continue to be used or operated without excessive maintenance cost or substantial reduction in trade-in value.

[29 FR 15994, Dec. 1, 1964]
#### § 101-39.102-2 Effective date of determination.

Unless a longer time is allowed, any determination made by the 6Administrator, GSA, shall become binding on all affected executive agencies 45 calendar days after issuance, except with respect to any agency which appeals or requests an exemption from any determination in accordance with § 101-39.103.
§ 776.8 Scope. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart are applicable to the following proposed postal facility actions located in a wetland: ( 1 ) New construction, owned or leased; or
( 2 ) Construction projects at an existing facility that would alter the external configuration of the facility.
( b ) These procedures are not applicable to the following postal facility actions: ( 1 ) Construction of foot and bike trails, or boardwalks, including signs, the primary purposes of which are public education, interpretation, or enjoyment of wetland resources;
( 2 ) Construction at existing postal facilities pursuant to the Architectural Barriers Act or postal accessibility standards;
( 3 ) Any facility construction project deemed necessary to comply with federal, state, or local health, sanitary, or safety code standards to ensure safe working conditions;
( 4 ) Construction of facilities that are functionally dependent on water, such as piers, docks, or boat ramps; or
( 5 ) Maintenance, repair, or renovation of existing facilities.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of ITIS Holdings Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

     (1)  the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 19, 2003                    ITIS Holdings Inc.


                                               /s/ Hunter M.A. Carr
                                             -------------------------
                                             Hunter M.A. Carr
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                               /s/ Joanna Hoover
                                             -------------------------
                                             Joanna Hoover
                                             Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
#### § 102-3.135 What does this subpart cover and how does it apply?

This subpart establishes policies and procedures relating to meetings and other activities undertaken by advisory committees and their subcommittees. This subpart also outlines what records must be kept by Federal agencies and what other documentation, including advisory committee minutes and reports, must be prepared and made available to the public.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

500 C Street, SW 

Washington, DC 20472 

FEMA 


March 24, 2017 

Dear Department/ Agency Dispute Resolution Specialist: 

I am writing on behalf ofthe Workplace Conflict Management Section ("Workplace 

Section") ofthe Interagency Alternative Dispute Resolution Working Group 

("IADRWG"), to make you aware of our community and its resources. The Workplace 

Section provides guidance on best practices in program development, education, and 

technical assistance to meet the ADR needs offederal agencies. We work with agencies 

and departments to enhance their workplace alternative dispute resolution (ADR) 

programs. 

Among the activities of the Workplace Section is the ADR Lunchtime Series (generally 

held on a bi-monthly basis) at the Department ofEnergy. The ADR Lunchtime Series 

features speakers who may be federal ADR practitioners and administrators, professors, 

or private, professional consultants. These speakers present on emerging workplace 

trends, conciliation and communication innovations, and thought-provoking concepts 

relevant to federal-workplace, ADR programs. For further information, contact Isabela 

Ferraz at lsabela.Ferraz(lv,hg.doe.gov. 

To receive notices about upcoming ADR Lunchtime Series programs, please go to 

www.adr.gov which is the DOJ/lADRWG home page. Join the list-serve on the home 

page. The list-serve keeps recipients informed of upcoming IADRWG events and the 

webpage tracks many of our past events with materials and recorded presentations. 

In addition to the ADR Lunchtime Series, the Workplace Section has launched a 

Conflict Management Consortium (CMC), a self-administered, regularly convened 

group of federal administrators and practitioners. CMC serves as a learning and 

networking forum where members develop and exchange experience and knowledge 

about federal workplace ADR programs. Please contact Cyrns Salazar at 

Cyrns.Salazar@ascr.usda.gov to learn more. 

For additional information about our resources and the activities of the Workplace 

Section or to become involved in Workplace Section activities, please visit our web site 

at https://www.adr.gov/workplace.htm or contact Cindy Mazur, Chair of the Workplace 

Section, at Cindy.Mazur@fema.dhs.gov or (202) 646-4094. Thank you. 

,?Yiithil~'.JM4i ur, /}

I ,.. ~, // r,, 1 Dire9tor fi r,. ttlVlfilx pi!pute Resolation l Offrce of 1ef Couns'el 

\fideral Emergency Ma~agement Agency 

500 C Street, S.W., ~yite 840 

Washington, D.C. 20472 

11,t ___ 

www.fema.gov
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Shuttle interactive meteorological data system studyAlthough focused toward the operational meteorological support review and definition of an operational meteorological interactive data display systems (MIDDS) requirements for the Space Meteorology Support Group at NASA/Johnson Space Center, the total operational meteorological support requirements and a systems concept for the MIDDS network integration of NASA and Air Force elements to support the National Space Transportation System are also addressed.Document ID19850013566Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsYoung, J. T.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison, WI, United States)*Fox, R. J.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison, WI, United States)*Benson, J. M.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison, WI, United States)*Rueden, J. P.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison, WI, United States)*Oehlkers, R. A.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison, WI, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:171418NASA-CR-171418Accession Number85N21876Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-33799Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850013566.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as
the case may be, of United Surgical Partners International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every
act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of
said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

| |  | /s/DONALD E. STEENDonald E. Steen
| |  | ---------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFault-tolerant software for the FIMPThe work reported here provides protection against software failures in the task dispatcher of the FTMP, a particularly critical portion of the system software. Faults in other system modules and application programs can be handled by similar techniques but are not covered in this effort. Goals of the work reported here are: (1) to develop provisions in the software design that will detect and mitigate software failures in the dispatcher portion of the FTMP Executive and, (2) to propose the implementation of specific software reliability measures in other parts of the system. Beyond the specific support to the FTMP project, the work reported here represents a considerable advance in the practical application of the recovery block methodology for fault tolerant software design.Document ID19860014805Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHecht, H.*(SoHaR, Inc. Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Hecht, M.*(SoHaR, Inc. Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1984Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:166070NASA-CR-166070Accession Number86N24276Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-34-13-33CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-15336Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860014805.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 561 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 561

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the operation in 
  certain metropolitan areas of civil subsonic turbojets that fail to 
                   comply with stage 3 noise levels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

 Mr. Rothman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit the operation in 
  certain metropolitan areas of civil subsonic turbojets that fail to 
                   comply with stage 3 noise levels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aircraft Noise Reduction Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. AIRCRAFT NOISE REDUCTION IN CERTAIN METROPOLITAN AREAS.

    Section 47528 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) Special Rule for Airports in Certain Metropolitan Areas.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may operate after 
the date of enactment of this subsection any civil subsonic turbojet 
that fails to comply with stage 3 noise levels to or from an airport 
located in any of the 20 most populated metropolitan areas in the 
United States, as determined by the Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8489-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8533-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8534-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8547-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8548-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8549-BER

CASE NO. 22-MJ-8550-BER

IN RE: SEALED SEARCH WARRANTS

__________________________________________/

OMNIBUS ORDER 

Media organizations (“the Media Coalition”) filed a motion to intervene and to 

unseal search warrant materials in each of the above-captioned matters. In its ex 

parte sealed responses, the Government does not oppose partially unsealing these 

materials. I have reviewed the motion, the Government’s responses, and the sealed 

materials. There is good cause to continue partially sealing the search warrant 

materials to protect (1) investigative sources and methods, including the identity of 

witnesses, (2) the identities of uncharged persons, and (3) grand jury materials. 

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED that:

1. The following Motions to Intervene and to Unseal Search Warrant 

Materials are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART:

Case Number Docket Entry

22-MJ-8489-BER 6

22-MJ-8533-BER 6

22-MJ-8534-BER 6

22-MJ-8547-BER 5

22-MJ-8548-BER 5

Case 9:22-mj-08489-BER Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

22-MJ-8549-BER 5

22-MJ-8550-BER 6

The Media Coalition is granted leave to intervene. The search warrant materials 

shall be partially unsealed. The Government’s proposed redactions are adopted. On 

or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on August 28, 2023, the Government shall file the 

redacted materials on the public docket in each matter.

2. The following Government’s motions to seal responses are GRANTED:

Case Number Docket Entry

22-MJ-8489-BER 11

22-MJ-8533-BER 12

22-MJ-8534-BER 11

22-MJ-8547-BER 10

22-MJ-8548-BER 10

22-MJ-8549-BER 10

22-MJ-8550-BER 11

On or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on September 1, 2023, the Government shall file 

under seal proposed redacted versions of its ex parte responses.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach 

County, in the Southern District of Florida, this 23rd day of August 2023.

__________________________________

BRUCE E. REINHART

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 9:22-mj-08489-BER Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2023 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5525 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5525

To extend the temporary office of bankruptcy judge established for the 
                      district of South Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2000

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary office of bankruptcy judge established for the 
                      district of South Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    The temporary office of bankruptcy judge authorized for the 
district of South Carolina under section 3(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy 
Judgeship Act of 1992 (28 U.S.C. 152 note) is extended until the first 
vacancy occurring in such office resulting from the death, retirement, 
resignation, or removal of a bankruptcy judge and occurring 8 years or 
more after June 27, 1994.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF OTHER PROVISIONS.

    All other provisions of section 3 of the Bankruptcy Judgeship Act 
of 1992 (28 U.S.C. 152 note) remain applicable to the temporary office 
of bankruptcy judge referred to in section 1.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Delta Apparel, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation;
andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: September 9, 2005
    
    /s/ Herbert M. MuellerVice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Haddrill,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, tomy knowledge:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
| Date: March 15, 2007                  |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/Richard Haddrill                   |   |
| Richard Haddrill                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

----
Case 9:22-cv-81758-XXXX Document 1-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/11/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:22-cv-81758-XXXX Document 1-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/11/2022 Page 2 of 2
AFS-10-345-E 

Aug 31 2010 

 Exemption No. 9755A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-24996 

Ms. Mindy Waham 

Flight Operations Compliance Manager 

Alaska Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 68900 

Seattle, WA 98168 

Dear Ms. Waham: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9755. 

It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated July 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (Alaska), for an extension of Exemption No. 9755. That 

exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Alaska to 

substitute a qualified and authorized check airman or aircrew program designee for an FAA 

inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade 

training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a 

landing. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Alaska. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9755 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9755 to September 30, 2012, 

unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9755 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9755. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Project No.: AFS-10-345-E