alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-79,065-02

EX PARTE MICHAEL A. SARLES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1212053D IN THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

DISSENTING OPINION

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Ex parte Fournier, 473

S.W.3d 789 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015).

FILED: FEBRUARY 10, 2016

DO NOT PUBLISH
**EXHIBIT 11.2DUKE-WEEKS REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPEARNINGS TO DEBT SERVICE CALCULATIONS(in thousands)**

** **

 
|                                                                 | **DECEMBER 31,** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
|                                                                 | **2000******     |
| Consolidated net  income available for common units                  | $245,029         |
| Gain on land and  depreciated property sales                         | (58,057)         |
| Recurring principal  amortization                                    | 10,720           |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) | 130,421****      |
|  earnings  before debt service                                  | $328,113****     |
| Interest expense  (excludes amortization of deferred financing fees) | $130,421         |
| Recurring  principal amortization                                    | 10,720****       |
|  total debt  service                                            | $141,141****     |
| **Debt service ratio**                                               | **2.32******     |
§ 101-30.101-2 Item of supply. *Item of supply* means an item of production that is purchased, cataloged, and assigned a national stock number by the Government. The item of supply is determined by the requirements of each Government agency's supply system. The item of supply concept differentiates one item from another item in the Federal Catalog System. Each item of supply is expressed in and fixed by a national item identification number. An item of supply may be: ( a ) A single item of production;
( b ) Two or more items of production that are functionally interchangeable;
( c ) A more precise quality controlled item than the regular item of production, or
( d ) A modification of a regular item of production.
[46 FR 35644, July 10, 1981]
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.4



FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE RAYONIER
 ADVANCED MATERIALS INC. NON CHANGE IN
 CONTROL EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN




This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. Non Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted as of October 21, 2019 by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors of Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc. (the “Company”).
1.The reference to “seventy-five miles” in Section 1.1(n)(ii) of the Plan is hereby amended to refer to “fifty miles.” 
2.Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
TERRELVariableDescriptionValueDefaultCommentsGTOPO30 GTOPO 30-sec data- n/a 1 degree DEM files will be usedXREFKM Reference point coordinates for grid168 n/aYREFKM Reference point coordinates for grid720 n/aNX Number of X grid cells40 n/aNYNumber of Y grid cells30n/aCTGPROCVariableDescriptionValueDefaultCommentsXREFKM Reference point coordinates for grid168 n/aYREFKM Reference point coordinates for grid720 n/aNX Number of X grid cells40 n/aNYNumber of Y grid cells30n/aCALMETVariableDescriptionValueDefaultCommentsNUSTA Number of upper air stations4 14898, 14918, 94983, 4837NX Number of X grid cells40 n/aNY Number of Y grid cells30 n/aXORIGKM Reference point coordinates for grid168 n/aYORIGKM Reference point coordinates for grid720 n/aNOOBS No Observation Mode0 Y Include Surface, Upper Air and Precipitation ObservationsNSSTA Number of Surface Stations74 n/a 74 surface weather stationsNPSTA Number of Precipitation Stations68 n/a 68 precipitation stationsRMAX2 Maximum radius of influence over land aloft50 n/a Similar to PSD with ObservationsRMAX3 Maximum radius of influence over water500 n/a Similar to PSD with ObservationsR1 Relative weighting of the first guess field and observations in the surface layer (km) 10 n/a Similar to PSD with ObservationsR2 Relative weighting of the first guess field and observations in the layers aloft (km) 20 n/a Similar toPSD with ObservationsISURFT Surface met. Stations to use for the surfacetemperature- n/a Hibbing Met stationIUPT Upper air station to use for the domain scale lapse rate- n/a International Falls Upper Air stationITPROG 3D temperature from observations or from prognostic data? 0 Y Inclusion of Surface and Upper AirTRADKM Radius of influence for temperature interpolation500 Y Similar to PSD with ObservationsJWAT1 Beginning land use category for temperature interpolation over water 99 n/a CALMET may fail when using 55 with no overwater dataJWAT2 Ending land use category for temperature interpolation over water 99 n/a CALMET may fail when using55 with no overwater dataSIGMAPRadius of influence (km)100YPrecipitation Observations are includedInput Group 0bInput Group 2Input Group 2Input Group 2Input Group 4Input Group 5Input Group 6CALPUFFVariableDescriptionValueDefaultCommentsNX Number of X grid cells in met grid40 n/aNY Number of Y grid cells in met grid30 n/aXORIGKM Reference point coordinates for met grid168 n/aYORIGKM Reference point coordinates for met grid720 n/aIBCOMP X index of LL corner1 n/aJBCOMP Y index of LL corner1 n/aIECOMP X index of UR corner40 n/aJECOMP Y index of UR corner30 n/aMOZ Ozone data input option1 N OZONE.DAT from MN, WI, and MI observation stationsNRECNumber of non-gridded receptors1222n/aUsing only BWCA and Voyageurs from MPCA protocolInput Group 11Input Group 17Input Group 4
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"ADR Neutrals","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Rb64ZTWwkw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/5neutrals\/\">ADR Neutrals<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/5neutrals\/embed\/#?secret=Rb64ZTWwkw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ADR Neutrals” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"Rb64ZTWwkw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
#### § 102-33.100 What are our responsibilities when contracting to purchase or capital lease a Federal aircraft or to award a CAS contract?

In contracting to purchase or capital lease a Federal aircraft or to award a CAS contract, you must follow the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (48 CFR Chapter 1) unless your agency is exempt from following the FAR.
H. R. 5016

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 514

Express Center Road in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘J.T. Weeker Service Center’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

514 Express Center Road in Chicago, Illinois, and known as the

Chicago International/Military Service Center, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘J.T. Weeker Service Center’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘J.T. Weeker

Service Center’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37359-37360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15051]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-809]


Certain Stainless Steel Flanges From India: Extension of Time 
Limit for Preliminary Results of New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Extension of Time Limit For Preliminary Results of New Shipper 
Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for the preliminary results of a new shipper review of 
certain stainless steel flanges from India. This review covers one 
Indian exporter, Bhansali Ferromet Pvt. Ltd., and the period August 1, 
1998 through July 31, 1999.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 14, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Killiam or Robert James, AD/CVD 
Enforcement, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5222, or (202) 482-0649, 
respectively.

Applicable Statute

    Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute refer to 
the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective date of the 
amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the Uruguay 
Round Agreements Act. In addition, all citations to the Department's 
regulations are to the current regulations, codified at 19 CFR Part 351 
(1999).

Background

    Based on a request from Bhansali, and pursuant to section 351.214, 
on February 17, 2000 the Department published a notice of initiation of 
a new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain stainless 
steel flanges from India, covering the period August 1, 1998 through 
July 31, 1999 ( 65 FR 8120). The preliminary results are currently due 
no later than June 7, 2000.

Postponement of Preliminary Results

    The Department has determined that the issues of this case are 
extraordinarily complicated and it is not practicable to issue the 
preliminary results of the new shipper review within the original time 
limit of June 7, 2000. See Memorandum from Richard A. Weible to Joseph 
A. Spetrini, Deputy

[[Page 37360]]

Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III, June 7, 2000. Accordingly, 
the Department is extending the time limit for completion of the 
preliminary results until September 5, 2000, in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 351.214(i)(2) of the Department's 
regulations. The deadline for the final results of this review will 
continue to be 90 days after the signature date of the preliminary 
results.

    Dated: June 7, 2000.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 00-15051 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
If you think you’re too old to worry about 

HIV/AIDS, think again.

HIV risk doesn’t stop at 50. In fact, men and women 

over age 50 account for 17 percent of all new HIV 

and AIDS diagnoses in the 40 states that have longterm confidential name-based reporting. Every 10 

minutes someone in the United States is infected 

with HIV. Make sure it’s not you. 

Risk does not diminish with age.

You’re at risk if you don’t use a condom when having sex with a man or a woman who has HIV. Oral 

sex also carries a risk of infection. The risk can be 

especially high for women with age-related vaginal 

thinning and dryness that can lead to tears in the 

vaginal area.

Many older adults find it awkward to talk to a new 

partner about their sexual history and HIV, and most 

don’t discuss sex with their doctors at all. That’s a risk 

you don’t have to take.

•	Before having sex with a new partner, discuss 

your HIV status. You both have a right to know.

• Ask your health care provider for an HIV test 

if you are having unprotected sex or injecting 

drugs. Medicare covers it. If you are a man who 

has had sex with other men, get tested at least 

once a year. If you are a woman, get tested whenever you have a new sex partner.

•	Get tested before engaging in sex with a new 

partner, and be sure your partner has been tested 

for HIV too.

•	Protect yourself. If you have multiple partners, 

use a latex condom and lubricant every time 

you have sex. Avoid contact with another person’s blood, and be sure to never share or reuse 

needles. 

•	Be alert to possible symptoms. HIV can go undetected in older people because the illnesses 

associated with it—such as weight loss, pneumonia, fatigue, confusion, and vision problems—

also occur more frequently with age. 

For more information about HIV and AIDS, 

visit www.AIDS.gov or 

www.ACTAGAINSTAIDS.org.

To find an HIV testing site near you, go to 

www.HIVTest.org or call 1-800-CDC-INFO

HIV: Know the RISKS. Get the FACTS.

Administration on Aging

www.aoa.gov | Email: aoainfo@aoa.hhs.gov
#### § 447.11 Applicability.

This part contains rules of conduct for the employees of the Postal Service. Employees are required to comply with the regulations in this part, and violations of the regulations may be cause for disciplinary action. The regulations in this part are in addition to other rules of conduct provided by applicable statutes, regulations, or Postal Service handbooks and manuals. For applicable rules of ethical conduct, employees are referred to the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, 5 CFR part 2635, and Postal Service regulations supplemental thereto, 5 CFR part 7001.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of AuGrid Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date:    April 14, 2004                 By:/s/ M.J. Shaheed
                                          --------------------------------
                                        Name:    M.J. Shaheed
                                        Title:   Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to AuGrid Corporation and
will be retained by AuGrid Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      October 26, 2009 | /s/ Dirk L. Benschop                                                       |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Dirk      L. Benschop, Director, Chief Executive Officer, and    President |

| Date:      October 26, 2009 | /s/ Alfonso de Borbón                                                                                                                                             |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Alfonso de Borbon, Vice President of Corporate Development, Chief FinancialOfficer,      and principal accounting officer |

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Thestate of the birds: United States of America**
 
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2013 | 2014 | 2019
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.44/5:B 53/
Item Number:0612-C-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001060339
 
July 3, 2018
Order entered February 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00079-CV

HEALTH TEXAS PROVIDER NETWORK, MICHAEL MACK, M.D., 

WILLIAM RYAN, M.D., DAVID BROWN, M.D., KEVIN THELEMAN, M.D. 

AND JOSE ESCOBAR, M.D., Appellants

V.

PATRICK ROUGHNEEN, M.D., CHERIE ROUGHNEEN AND 

PATRICK T. ROUGHNEEN, M.D., P.A., Appellees

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-14053

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ January 23, 2019 unopposed motion to consolidate this

appeal with appellate cause number 05-18-00966-CV, styled Baylor Scott & White Health, 

Baylor Medical Center at Grapevine, Ronald Jensen, D.O., Trent Pettijohn, M.D., and Texas 

Heart Hospital of the Southwest L.L.P. d/b/a The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano v. Patrick 

Roughneen, M.D., Cherie Roughneen and Patrick T. Roughneen, M.D., P.A.. Both appeals stem 

from the same underlying suit and challenge interlocutory orders denying motions to dismiss 

under chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The motions were heard on 

the same day, but the orders were signed five months apart. 
Appellants note in their motion that because the motions were heard on the same date, the 

two appeals share the same reporter’s record. They further note that the two appeals share

substantially the same clerk’s record. If the two appeals are consolidated, appellants submit the 

clerk’s record would need to be supplemented only with a copy of their motion to dismiss and 

the order denying their motion. 

We GRANT the motion and CONSOLIDATE this appeal into appellate cause number 

05-18-00966-CV. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer all documents from this 

appeal into appellate cause number 05-18-00966-CV. For administrative purposes, this appeal is 

treated as a closed case. The parties, trial court clerk, and court reporter shall now use only 

appellate cause number 05-18-00966-CV.

As appellants note in their motion, briefing in appellate cause number 05-18-00966-CV is 

complete and the appeal is awaiting submission. Accordingly, we ORDER Dallas County 

District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than February 12, 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing a copy of appellants’ motion to dismiss and the trial court’s January 4, 2019 order 

denying the motion. We further ORDER appellants to file their brief on the merits no later than 

March 4, 2019.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and all 

parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38289-38290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 99N-4166]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval; Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Electronic Records; Electronic 
Signatures'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn P. Capezutto, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of October 1, 1999 
(64 FR 53392), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0303. 
The approval expires on May 31, 2003. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.


[[Page 38290]]


    Dated: June 14, 2000.
William K. Hubbard,
Senior Associate Commissioner for Policy, Planning, and Legislation.
[FR Doc. 00-15432 Filed 6-19-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F