alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 31.2

                       Section 302 Certification

I, Nathan S. Eckhart, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allen Organ
  Company;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
  the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
  cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
  this report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have:
   a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
      such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
      our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
      to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;
   b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our
      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
      and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
      report based on such evaluation; and
   c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
      the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
  reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
  registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):
   a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial
      reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
      registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and
   b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting.

/s/NATHAN S. ECKHART
Nathan S. Eckhart
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2004
Case 1:22-cr-20340-KMW Document 14-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2022 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:22-cr-20340-KMW Document 14-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2022 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:22-cr-20340-KMW Document 14-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2022 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SentoCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Anthony J. Sansone, Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Anthony J. Sansone                                                  |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                    |
| Anthony J. Sansone                                                      |
| Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and Corporate Secretary |
| August 12, 2005                                                    |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            268256
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           274348
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             274349
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  274348
<CASH>                                            1112
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              336912
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                            7849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  657106
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 416480
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             101992
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7079
<OTHER-SE>                                       71001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    657106
<PREMIUMS>                                       63437
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              11684
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (281)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    5654
<BENEFITS>                                       60443
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      11384
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                              7080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1141
<INCOME-TAX>                                       398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                743
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       743
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.1
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.1
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITEM 1 OF FORM 10-Q DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             117
<SECURITIES>                                        75
<RECEIVABLES>                                      108
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         39
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   362
<PP&E>                                             374
<DEPRECIATION>                                      72
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               86
<BONDS>                                            897
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1357
<SALES>                                            100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   338
<CGS>                                               65
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (274)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.22)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 101-26.803-4 Adjustments.

GSA and DOD will adjust billings resulting from over or under charges, or discrepancies or deficiencies in shipments, or material on a bill submitted under the provisions of this subpart 101-26.8 and the GSA publication referenced in § 101-26.803-1.

[55 FR 24086, June 14, 1990]
§ 960.14 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of an application, counsel representing the Postal Service may file an answer to the application. Unless the Postal Service counsel requests an extension of time for filing or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30-day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( b ) If the Postal Service counsel and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted by the adjudicative officer upon request by Postal Service counsel and the applicant.
( c ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the Postal Service's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the Postal Service shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 960.19.
AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                           NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED                  THIRTY-NINE WEEKS ENDED
                                        -----------------------------           -----------------------------
                                        February 28,         March 1,           February 28,         March 1,
                                            1998               1997               1998                1997
                                            ----               ----               ----                ----
<S>                                        <C>                <C>                <C>                 <C>    
Net income for computing
  earnings per common share                $46,739            $33,789            $47,892             $82,998
                                          ========            =======            =======            ========


Weighted average number of
   common shares outstanding
   during each period                      916,450            922,222            911,633             923,352
                                          ========            =======            =======            ========

Net income per common share                 $0.051             $0.037             $0.053              $0.090
                                          ========            =======            =======            ========
</TABLE>

                                      (10)
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.211-3 Termination of or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance.

No order suspending, terminating or refusing to grant or continue Federal financial assistance shall become effective until (a) the responsible GSA official has advised the applicant or recipient of his failure to comply and has determined that compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means, (b) there has been an express finding on the record, after opportunity for hearing, of a failure by the applicant or recipient to comply with a requirement imposed by or pursuant to this subpart 101-6.2, (c) the action has been approved by the Administrator pursuant to § 101-6.213-5, and (d) the expiration of 30 days after the Administrator has filed with the committee of the House and the committee of the Senate having legislative jurisdiction over the program involved, a full written report of the circumstances and the grounds for such action. Any action to suspend or terminate or to refuse to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance shall be limited to the particular political entity, or part thereof, or other applicant or recipient as to whom such a finding has been made and shall be limited in its effect to the particular program, or part thereof, in which such noncompliance has been so found.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

September 30, 2016 

Marcia Hadenf eldt, Library Assistant 

Montezuma Creek Library and Bluff Library, San Juan County 

P.O. Box 99 

Bluff UT 84512 

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Montezuma Creek Library and 

Bluff Library for public inspection 

The purpose of this letter is to request that the Montezuma Creek Library and Bluff Library 

retain the enclosed package at the library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. The 

package consists of documents related to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's 

final decision on the Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration amendment permit 

for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation 

near the city of Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. 

We would greatly appreciate your assistance for making these documents available to the general 

public. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or r9airpermits@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Enclosure 

Sincerely, 

�� 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Environmental Engineer 

Permits Office, Air Division
#### § 931.1 Compromise of obligations.

Any proposition of compromise shall be submitted in writing, and the amount offered in compromise shall be deposited with the Manager, Accounting Division or the appropriate postal data center. If the offer in compromise is rejected the amount deposited will be returned. The amount of a compromise offer must be tendered unconditionally for deposit pending the consideration of acceptance. Checks and drafts cannot be accepted as offers in compromise when they bear endorsements or instructions to the effect that the acceptance of such checks or drafts constitutes settlement in full of the claim, fine, penalty, or liability in connection with which the offer is made, except that such checks or drafts may be accepted when they are accompanied with a written waiver of the endorsements or instructions printed thereon. Offers in compromise should be transmitted or delivered to the office or officer of the Postal Service from whom demand is received for payment of the amount due.

([39 U.S.C. 401](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/39/401))

[[26 FR 11662](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/26-FR-11662), Dec. 6, 1961. Redesignated at [33 FR 6291](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/33-FR-6291), Apr. 25, 1968]

Rules of Procedure Before the Postal Inspection Service
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

CERTIFICATION OF MARVIN PUTNAM

Marvin Putnam, Esquire, pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing the Admission, 

Practice, Peer Review, and Discipline of Attorneys, hereby certifies that: (1) I have studied the 

Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; (2) I am a 

member in good standing of the Bar of the District of California since 2001 and New York since 

1994; and (3) I have not filed three or more motions for pro hac vice admission in this District 

within the last 365 days.

/s/ Marvin Putnam

 Marvin Putnam 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 37-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 958.5 Scope of hearing; evidentiary standard. ( a ) A hearing under this part shall be conducted by the Presiding Officer on the record: ( 1 ) To determine whether the respondent is liable under 39 U.S.C. 3018, and
( 2 ) If so, to determine the amount of any civil penalties, clean-up costs and/or damages to be imposed.
( b ) The Postal Service must prove its case against a respondent by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The parties may offer for insertion onto the record such relevant evidence as they deem appropriate and as would be admissible under the generally accepted rules of evidence applied in the courts of the United States in nonjury trials, subject, however, to the sound discretion of the Presiding Officer in supervising the extent and manner of presentation of such evidence. In general, admissibility will hinge on relevancy and materiality. However, relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
Exhibit 32.2

                            RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                   RELM Wireless Corporation


                                                   /s/William P. Kelly
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   William P. Kelly
                                                   Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   October 28, 2004
#### THE AGRICULTURAL NATIONAL BANK OF PITTSFIELD, Respondent, *v.*HIRAM G. SHEFFIELD and others, Appellants.

*Promissory note—when usurious*— *lex loci contradi.*

The plaintiff, a Massachusetts corporation, agreed to take notes in payment of a judgment, a lien on real estate owned by some of the defendants, under an arrangement which, by the laws of this State, would be usurious, though not so under the laws of Massachusetts. All the defendants resided in the State of Rew York, and the transactions took place in this State, but the notes were dated at Pittsfield, Massachusetts, and made payablejiiere, with the intention, as was claimed by defendants’ counsel, to evade the usury law of this State. The only evidence of such intention was, that one of the defendants offered to draw the note himself ; that the attorney of the bank, in the presence of one of the *422directors, said “No, we will make the notes ourselves; we have blanks here in my office [at Canandaigua, N. lib], and I will make out the notes,” and he drew the note in question; that there was no agreement or understanding at the time that any of the debt was to be paid in Massachusetts, or that the notes would be paid there. The court at Special Term gave judgment for the plaintiff. The General Term affirmed the judgment, holding that the contract was a Massachusetts contract *(Curtis*v. *Leavitt,*15 N. Y., 88; *Cutler*v. *Wright,*22 id., 472), and that the facts stated were not sufficient to show an intention to evade the statute of this State against usury.

*Wm. H. Smith,*for the appellants.

*John Gillette, Jr.,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Morgan, J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Morgan, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
<Page>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY




       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Donald E. Steen, Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik and each of
them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his
behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United
Surgical Partners International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite
and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents
and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.






                                            /s/ Joel T. Allison
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Joel T. Allison