alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT W ILLIE M ORR IS C LAY, II, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. M ARK PETER SON, C hie f Distric t Attorne y ; e t

a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 15-16320 D.C . No. 5:14-c v-02932-R M W M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Northe rn Distric t of C a lifornia R ona ld M . Whyte , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 26, 2016 ** B e fore : SC HR O EDER , C ANB Y, a n d C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r W illie M o rris C la y , II, a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e n t dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging de fam at ion of c ha

ra c te r. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w 

# FIL ED AUG 05 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).de novo a

dism issa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915A. Re snic k v . Hay e

s , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th C i r. 2000). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d C la

y ’ s a c tion be c a

use C l ay fa ile d to a lle ge fa c ts suffic ie nt to show tha t de fe nda nts’ a lle ge dly

de fam atory sta

te m e nt a lte re d or e xtinguishe d a sta te -re c ogniz e d right or sta

tus. Se e Paul v . Dav i

s , 424 U.S. 693, 710-12 (1976) (to sta te a de fam ation c l a im

unde r § 1983, plaintiff m ust a lle ge tha t a sta te -re c ogniz e d right or sta

tus wa s a lte re d or e x tinguishe d in a ddition to a ny re puta t iona l ha rm ). AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 1 6 3 2 0 2
FY 2022 Q2 FOIA Quarterly Report

Agency

Corporation for National and Community Service

Reporting Quarter 

2022

10 Oldest Requests

Did your agency have 10 or more perfected requests pending at the end of the last fiscal year? If so, please select 

the number 10. If your agency had fewer than 10, please select the correct number.

Of the ten or fewer requests identified in your previous response, please select the number of requests your

agency has closed during the current fiscal year.

FOIA Requests Information

Component Requests Received in Requests Processed Requests Backlogged as of

Reporting Quarter in Reporting Quarter End of Reporting Quarter

CNCS

9

10Q3 8 10 4
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 4911

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide competitive civil service

status for National Guard technicians who are involuntarily separated

other than for cause from National Guard service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 2000

Mr. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide competitive

civil service status for National Guard technicians who

are involuntarily separated other than for cause from

National Guard service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPETITIVE CIVIL SERVICE STATUS FOR NA4 TIONAL GUARD TECHNICIANS WHO ARE IN5 VOLUNTARILY SEPARATED FROM NATIONAL

6 GUARD SERVICE.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3304(c)(2) of title 5,

8 United States Code, is amended—
2

•HR 4911 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘for at least 3 years’’ in the

2 matter preceding subparagraph (A);

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara4 graph (A);

5 (3) by striking subparagraph (B); and

6 (4) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as sub7 paragraph (B).

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

9 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to individuals invol10 untarily separated from service as a technician on or after

11 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
TS- ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment # 8

Pt. 2, Sec. B, End

Worker /Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release Information on the New

Chemical Substance s at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROBERT WALKER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3419

[November 10, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jeffrey Dana Gillen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2017CF000293AMB.

Carol Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.215-3 Supervision and coordination.

The Administrator may from time to time assign to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government, with the consent of such departments or agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of title VI of the Act and this subpart (other than responsibility for final decision as provided in § 101-6.213), including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within GSA and within the executive branch of the Government in the application of title VI and this subpart to similar programs and in similar situations. Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another Department or Agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this section shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the responsible GSA official.

[38 FR 17975, July 5, 1973]
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                            HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                           Certified Public Accountant
                                 (216) 491-0800
                               FAX (216) 491-0803




December 12, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., Certified Public Accountant, consents to
the inclusion of its report dated December 12, 2001 on the Financial Statements
of AuGRID of Nevada, Inc. (the "Company") included in Amendment No. 3 to the
Company's report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.

Respectfully,

/s/ Henry L. Creel

Henry L. Creel, CPA

















                    3587 LEE ROAD SHAKER HEIGHTS, OHIO 44120
Order filed November 17, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00771

- CR

____________ SCOTT NOAH SANTSCHI , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 1474591



### ABATEMENT ORDER
Appellant is not represented by counsel on appeal. The clerk’s record
reflects that a ppellant requested appointment of appellate counsel. This court is unaware whether appellant is entitled to appointment of counsel. Accordingly, we enter the following order.
We ORDER the judge of the 179th District Court to immediately conduct a hearing at which appellant and counsel for the Stat e shall be present to determinewhether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is

indigent and, thus entitled to appointed counsel. The judge shall appoint appellate counsel for appellant, if necessary. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk ’ s record containing the findings and conclusions. Those records shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the
trial court’s fin dings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking rein statement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of s uch date.

PER CURIAM
#### § 101-30.701-3 Preparing activity.

*Preparing activity* means a Government agency responsible for the preparation of item reduction studies, or an activity authorized by the listed agencies to conduct an item reduction study. The DOD Standardization Directory SD-1 provides such a listing.
#### § 101-39.105-1 Transfers from discontinued or curtailed fleet management systems.

When a fleet management system is discontinued or curtailed, transfers of vehicles and related equipment and supplies, personnel, records, facilities, and funds as may be appropriate will be made, subject to the approval of the Director, OMB. Reimbursement for motor vehicles and related equipment and supplies acquired by GSA through expenditure made from, and not previously reimbursed to the General Supply Fund, or any revolving or trust fund authorized by law, shall be made by the agency receiving the motor vehicles and related equipment and supplies in an amount equal to the fair market value, as required by law (40 U.S.C. 491(g)).
Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### SOLOMON SIMSON, as Executor, Respondent, *v.*LUCINA C. SATTERLEE and others, Appellants.

*Mortgage*— assignment *of, as collateral security-*— right *of mortgagee to foreclose.*

Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mortgage given to him, and which he had assigned to the defendant M. as collateral security for a debt which was unpaid at the time of the commencement of this action. The mortgagor demurred on the grounds, that plaintiff could not maintain the action as he had assigned his mortgage, and that M. should be made a plaintiff, and not a defendant. *Meld*(1), that plaintiff could 'maintain the action, notwithstanding the assignment *(Norton*v. *Warner,*8 Edw. Ch., 106); (2), that, in any event, so long as the assignee was a party and did not object, the mortgagor could not raise the question.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon an order overruling a demurrer, and from an order denying a motion for leave to answer.

*A. PrenUoe,*for appellant. N. *F. Pawson,*for respondent.

Opinion by

Tappen, J. ■

Present' — Talcott and Tappen, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, witb costs.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.1.1




                                                     May 21, 1997



Alscott Limited Partnership #1
280 E. Parkcenter Blvd., Ste. 100
Boise, ID  83706
Attn: Thomas J. Wilford

         RE:      Transfer of 20,842,446 Shares of Albertson's, Inc. Common
                  Stock (the "Stock") to the J.A. and Kathryn Albertson
                  Foundation, Inc.

Dear Mr. Wilford:

         The purpose of this letter is to state that Albertson's, Inc. will not
require compliance by Alscott Limited Partnership #1 (the "Limited Partnership")
with the terms of Section 3.2 of the Agreement between the Limited Partnership
and Albertson's dated February 2, 1996 (the "Agreement") in connection with the
transfer of 20,842,446 shares of Stock to the J.A. and Kathryn Albertson
Foundation, Inc.

                                                     Sincerely,

                                                     ALBERTSON'S, INC.

                                                     GARY G. MICHAEL

                                                     Gary G. Michael
                                                     Chairman of the Board and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer



GGM:dmd
EXHIBIT 10
                                                                     ----------

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT MINING ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS


We hereby  consent to references to our name in the Company's  Annual Report on
Form 40-F to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  We also confirm
that we have  read the  Annual  Information  Form and that we have no reason to
believe that there are any  misrepresentations  in the information contained in
it that are  derived  from the  Reports or that are within our  knowledge  as a
result of the services we performed in connection with the Reports.

         /s/ Craig Acott
         -----------------------------
         Craig Acott, P. Eng.
         Norwest Corporation
         Independent Mining Consultants
         Calgary, AB

         February 22, 2007
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Senior Airman NICHOLAS R. MARTINO

United States Air Force

ACM S32254

26 March 2015

Sentence adjudged 13 May 2014 by SPCM convened at Little Rock Air 

Force Base, Arkansas. Military Judge: Lynn Watkins (sitting alone).

Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 12 months,

and reduction to E-1.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Patrick E. 

Neighbors and Major Thomas A. Smith.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Colonel Katherine E. Oler.

Before

ALLRED, HECKER, and TELLER

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent 

under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error 

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Article 66(c), 

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.210 Conduct of investigations.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0650. EDWARDO P. SHUMAN v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A.

Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., filed a complaint for equitable reformation of a deed

and declaratory judgment against Charlie Ann Massey, Jermaine A. Simmons, and

Edwardo Shuman, as Trustee for 32 Red Leaf Drive Trust.

1 Neither Massey nor

Simmons filed an answer, and Wells Fargo moved for default judgment against

Massey. The trial court granted the motion, permitting the deed to be reformed as

between Massey and Wells Fargo.

2

Shuman filed both a motion to dismiss and a motion to set aside the trial court’s

ruling. In both motions, Shuman argued that the Bartow County Superior Court

lacked subject matter jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motions, and Shuman

filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

In construing pleadings,substance controls over nomenclature. See Kuriatnyk

v. Kuriatnyk, 286 Ga. 589, 590 (690 SE2d 397) (2010). Here, both motions filed by

Shuman asserted that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Such a motion

constitutes a motion to set aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (1). And an appeal from

an order denying a motion to set aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) must be taken by

application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8); Jim Ellis Atlanta,

Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). Under these

1 The complaint, which was filed in Cobb County Superior Court, was

transferred to Bartow County Superior Court.

2 Simmons entered a consent agreement with Wells Fargo in which he agreed

to the deed’s reformation.

December 23, 2015
circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to entertain Shuman’s appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/23/2015
RETURN OFSERVICE

Case: Court: County: Job:

22-œ -23543- UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN SOUTHERN DISTRIG OFFLORIDA 8224230

ALTMAN DISTRICTOFFLORIDA

Plaintiff/Petitioner: DefendantIRespondent:

MALVIN GARNET YASM IN MO RSHEDIAN etaI.

Receivedby; For:

OneServeLegal,LLC MalvinGamett

Tobeservedupon:

LesiePuzo

ReceivedbyOneServeLegai,LLConJanuaryS,2023at1Q:51am tobeservedonLesiePuzoat1175NE125thStreet#61R Miami,FL33181.

1,QaisarAndersondoherebyaffirm thatonJanuary24,2023at10:43am,1:

SubstituteservedatruecopyoftheOrderInCasesWithMultipleDefendants,AmendedComplaintForViolationOfCivilRights,Verified

Complaint-DemandForluryTrial,withthedateandhourofserviceendoaedthereonbyme,to:LesiePuzoat1175NE125thStreet#618,

Miami,FL33181andacceptedbyKlaraFerminanemployeewhostatedtheyareauthorizedtoacceptandinformed>idpersonofthe

contentstherein,incompliancewithstates'tatutesF.S.4B.(B1(1)and48.081

IcertifythatIam overtheageof18,havenointerestintheaboveaction,andam authorized,ingoodstanding,intheludicialCircuitin

whichtheprocesswasserved.

Underpenaltiesofperjury,IdeclarethatIhavereadtheforgoingdocumentandthatthefactsstatedinitaretrue.Notarynotrequired

pursuanttoFloridaStatutes92.525(2).

RecipientNam e/Addreu: KlaraFerminat1175NQ125thStreet#618,Miami,Ft33181

MannerofService: Authorized,January24,2023,10:43am EST

Documene: OrderlnCasesWithMultipleDefendants,AmendedComplaintForViolationOfCivilRights,Verified

Complaint-DemandForluryTrial(ReceivedJanuary5,2023at10:51am EST)

AdditionalCom m ents:

1)SuccessfulAttempt:January24,2023,10:43am ESTat1175NE125thStreet#618,Miami,FL33181receivedbyKlaraFermin.Age:40%;

Ethnicity:AfricanAmerican;GendecFemale;Height'.5'4'1,*HairBlack;Relationship'.Authorizedemployee;Othecreceptionsaidshehad

authorizationtoaccept

01/25/20%

QaisarAndeoon Date

2273

OneServeLegal,LLC

32NE151A REET

Miami,Fl33162

786-527-4165

Case 1:22-cv-23543-RKA Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 954.15 Judicial Officer.

The Judicial Officer is authorized (a) to act as presiding officer at hearings and (b) to render a final Postal Service Decision for the Postmaster General. On appeal from an Initial Decision of an Administrative Law Judge, the Judicial Officer will consider the entire record including the initial decision and the exceptions to that decision. Before any final agency decision has been rendered, the Judicial Officer may order the hearing reopened for the presiding officer to take additional evidence.
68354363;1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM 

EDWIN GARRISON, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants. 

/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT DAVID ORTIZ 

Katherine A. Johnson, Esq., of the law firm Akerman LLP, hereby enter her appearance as 

counsel on behalf of Defendant David Ortiz and request that copies of all orders, process, 

pleadings, and other documents filed or served in this matter be served on them via CM/ECF or at 

the address listed below, as appropriate. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Date: January 24, 2023 AKERMAN LLP 

201 East Las Olas Boulevard – Suite 1800 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-2229 

Tel.: 954-463-2700 

Fax: 954-463-2224 

By: /s/ Katherine A. Johnson 

Katherine A. Johnson, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 1040357 

katie.johnson@akerman.com 

Counsel for Defendant David Ortiz

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2023 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of chromium and aluminum on mechanical and oxidation properties of iron-nickel-base superalloys based on CG-27The effects of chromium and aluminum on the mechanical and oxidation properties of a series of gamma-prime-strengthened alloys based on CG-27 were studied. Gamma-prime dispersion and solid-solution strengthening were the principal modes of alloy strengthening. The oxidation attack parameter K sub a decreased with increasing Cr and Al contents for each alloy group based on Al content. As a group, alloys with 3 wt % Al had the lowest attack parameters. Therefore, 3 wt % is the optimum level of Al for parabolic oxidation behavior. Spalling, due to diffusion-induced grain growth, was controlled by the overall Cr and Al levels. The alloy with 4 wt % Cr and 3 wt % Al had stress-rupture properties superior to those of the base alloy, CG-27, and maintained parabolic oxidation behavior while the Cr content was reduced by two-thirds of its value in cast CG-27.Document ID19850013013Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSchuon, S. R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-2320NAS 1.60:2443NASA-TP-2443Meeting InformationMeeting: TMS-AIME Fall MeetingLocation: Detroit, MICountry: United StatesStart Date: September 17, 1984End Date: September 20, 1984Accession Number85N21323Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-62Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850013013.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           I, Douglas M. Whitenack, as Chief Financial Officer of Allcity
Insurance Company (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June,
2003 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: August 14, 2003
                                      /s/ Douglas M. Whitenack
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Douglas M. Whitenack,
                                      Chief Financial Officer