alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Served: February 11 , 201 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 11 th of February, 2011

Essential Air Service at

FORT DODGE, IOWA MASON CITY, IOW A WATERTOWN, SOUTH DAKOTA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET 200 1

- 10682

DOCKET 2001

- 10682

DOCKET 2001

- 10644

NOTICE OF EXTENSION

Fort Dodge and Mason City, Iowa By Order 201 1

- 1

- 12, January 14, 2011 , we requested proposals for EAS at Fort Dodge and Mason City, Iowa , no later than March 1, 2011

. The current contract expires on May 31, 2011.

Watertown, South Dakota By Order 2011

- 1

- 23, January 28, 2011, we requested proposals for EAS at Watertown, South Dakota, no later than March 2, 2011. The curr ent contract expires on July 31, 2011.

By email dated February 10 , 20 11

, Delta Air Lines in dicated it is in ongoing negotiations with its Delta Connection partners, and those negotiations will not be completed in time for it to respond to the current de adlines for proposals at the three communities, and requested

a n extension to April 5, 2011 , for all three communities

.

W e have decided to grant Delta’s request , as the additional amount of time is not unreasonable. All parties must now file c ompetitive proposals for EAS at Fort Dodge and Mason City, Iowa, and Watertown, South Dakota, no later than April 5 , 20 1 1

.

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,197,753
<SECURITIES>                               136,085,570
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,056,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (322,406)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           152,471,878
<PP&E>                                      17,766,645
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,403,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             177,395,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       88,231,050
<BONDS>                                     49,646,209
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,414,849
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,103,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               177,395,532
<SALES>                                      6,451,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,642,065
<CGS>                                        3,932,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,932,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,394,871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,365,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,949,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                   540,237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,409,415
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,409,415
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
#### § 102-33.235 What documentation must we maintain for life-limited parts and FSCAP?

For life-limited parts and FSCAP, you must hold and update the documentation that accompanies these parts for as long as you use or store them. When you dispose of life-limited parts or FSCAP, the up-to-date documentation must accompany the parts. (See § 102-33.370.)
§ 101-28.306-1 Establishment of a CSC account by a customer activity. ( a ) Eligible agencies should contact the GSA Regional Federal Supply Service Bureau to obtain full information on the use of the CSC for their locale. FSS Bureau personnel will provide assistance to agencies in the establishment of the CSC account, brief personnel on the use of the CSC to meet local, retail supply requirements, and provide copies of the CSC catalog.
( b ) An appropriate level management official (division director of higher) authorized to obligate agency funds must sign the GSA Form 3525, Application for Customer Supply Services, requesting establishment of the CSC account for the activity.
SUBMERGED CULTURAL RESOURCES SITE REPORT:

NOQUEBAY

Apostle Islands National Lakeshore

Toni cARRELL 

Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers

Number 7

Santa Fe, New Mexico

1985
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Zachary Lipshultz of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Golden State Warriors, LLC (“GSW”), and requests that all 

papers served in this case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following attorney appears on behalf of GSW in this 

action as required under the Rules, and is entering this appearance without prejudice to, or waiver 

of, GSW’s personal jurisdiction defense or any other defenses. This is not a general appearance in 

Garrison or any other action.

Dated: April 6, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Zachary Lipshultz

Zachary Lipshultz

Florida Bar No. 123594

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 106 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Email: zach@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Golden State Warriors, LLC

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 106 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-13   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5477 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5477

  To provide that gaming shall not be allowed on certain Indian trust 
  lands in California that were purchased with certain Federal grant 
                                 funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2000

Mr. Hunter (for himself, Mr. Cunningham, and Mr. Filner) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that gaming shall not be allowed on certain Indian trust 
  lands in California that were purchased with certain Federal grant 
                                 funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GAMING NOT ALLOWED ON CERTAIN LANDS.

    Class II and class III gaming (as those terms are defined in 
section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)) shall 
not be allowed on any land that--
            (1) is located within the exterior boundaries of San Diego 
        County, California;
            (2) was taken into trust by the Department of the Interior 
        between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1986; and
            (3) was purchased, in whole or in part, using amounts 
        provided under the community development block grant program 
        under title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
        1974.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, (the Report) of Allied Capital Corporation (the Registrant),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; I, William L.
Walton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ William L. WaltonName:
    William L. WaltonDate: May 7, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      95
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  375
<OTHER-SE>                                               (470)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        1,095
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (1,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (1,095)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.00)



</TABLE>
From: McKaughan, Colleen

Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:47:16 PM To: jgarrity@asarco.com Cc: Nudd, Gregory; GLASS, GEOFFREY; Chen, Eugene; Kelly, Shaheerah; Webb, Thomas; ecm@azdeq.gov Subject: New Court

- Ordered Deadline for Arizona Regional Haze FIP

Dear Jack,

I’m writing to let you know that the court

- ordered deadline for EPA to propose a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) addressing regional haze in Arizona has been extended to September 6, 2013. Our deadline for final action on Arizona’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) remains July 15, 2013. The deadline for commenting on our December 20, 2012 proposed action on Arizona’s SIP is March 6, 2013.

If EPA finalizes disapproval of any aspect of the Arizona Regional Haze SIP, we are obligated to propose and later finalize a FIP to address these disapproved portions. The deadlines for these proposed and final actions are set in a consent decree. The parties to the consent decree recently agreed to extend these deadlines and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting a motion to amend the consent decree to reflect these new deadlines. The new deadlines of September 6 , 2013 for the proposed action and February 6, 2014 for the final action provide the agency more time for the technical work that will form the
basis of the FIP.

If you are planning to provide technical information that you think would be helpful to EPA i n preparing our FIP proposal, please provide that information no later than May 10, 2013 . This will allow us enough time to review and consider the information in preparing the proposal.

In the case of the equipment you identified as BART

- eligible (anode f urnaces 1 and 2 and converters 1, 3, 4, and 5) in Hayden, Arizona, we are particularly interested in getting your feedback regarding the effectiveness of existing SO 2 and PM controls and the estimated costs of installing more effective SO 2 and PM controls and increasing the effectiveness of existing controls. You may also propose your own five factor BART analyses for SO 2 and PM for the

BART

- eligible units.

If you have any questions, please let me know. We look forward to hearing from you soon.

Colleen McKa ughan
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

September 2, 2004

Albertson's, Inc.
Boise, Idaho

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial
information of Albertson's, Inc. and subsidiaries for the thirteen and
twenty-six week periods ended July 29, 2004 and July 31, 2003, as indicated in
our report dated August 30, 2004; because we did not perform an audit, we
expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended
July 29, 2004, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-54998 and 333-113995 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 2-80776,
33-2139, 33-7901, 33-15062, 33-43635, 33-62799, 33-59803, 333-82157, 333-82161,
333-87773 and 333-73194 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/S/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-----------------------------
Boise, Idaho
# Delegation of Authority Under Section 1401(b) of the 

Public Law 106-65

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State the duties and responsibilities vested in the President by section 1401(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (“the Act”) (Public Law 106-65).

The Department of State shall obtain concurrence on the report from the following agencies:  the Department of Defense, the Department of Commerce, and the Director of Central Intelligence on behalf of the Intelligence Community prior to submission to the Congress.

Any reference in this memorandum to the provisions of any Act shall be deemed to be a reference to such Act or its provisions as may be amended from time to time.

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 00-1501

Billing code 4710-10-M
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5502 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5502

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum amount 
            of a home loan guarantee available to a veteran.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 2000

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum amount 
            of a home loan guarantee available to a veteran.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF HOUSING LOAN GUARANTEE.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A)(i)(IV) of section 3703(a)(1) of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking ``$50,750'' and 
inserting ``$63,175''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subparagraph (B) of that section is 
amended by striking ``$50,750'' and inserting ``$63,175''.
                                 <all>
```
V

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5452

For the relief of Andrea Patricia Burton.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Mr. OWENS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Andrea Patricia Burton.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ANDREA

4 PATRICIA BURTON.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Andrea Patricia Burton shall be eligible for issuance

8 of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that

9 of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence

10 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant

11 visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of

12 status to lawful permanent resident.
2

•HR 5452 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Andrea Patricia

2 Burton enters the United States before the filing deadline

3 specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have

4 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi5 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245

6 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of

7 the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Andrea Patricia Burton, the Secretary of State

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the

17 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of

18 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

23 202(e) of such Act.

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural
3

•HR 5452 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Andrea Patricia Burton

2 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any

3 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act.

Æ
§ 334.740 North Shore Choctawhatchee Bay, Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. ( a ) *The area.* The restricted area shall encompass all navigable waters of the United States as defined at 33 CFR part 329 within the area bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates: Commencing from the shoreline at latitude 30°28′59.90′′ N, longitude 086°29′08.88′′ W; thence to latitude 30°28′59.61′′ N, longitude 086°29′01.81′′ W; thence to latitude 30°29′08.01′′ N, longitude 086°28′47.78′′ W; then following the mean high water line at a distance of 1,000 feet to a point at latitude 30°26′48.60′′ N, longitude 086°32′31.95′′ W, thence proceeding directly to a point on the shoreline at latitude 30°26′53.58′′ N, longitude 086°32′41.81′′ W. The area also includes all contiguous inland navigable waters that lie within the land boundaries of Eglin AFB.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) All persons, vessels and other craft are permitted access to the restricted area described in paragraph (a) of this section. Any person or vessel within the restricted area will be subject to identification checks by U.S. Air Force patrol boats. During times of high security threats against Eglin AFB, all entry, transit, anchoring or drifting within the restricted area described in paragraph (a) of this section for any reason is not allowed without the permission of the Commander, 96 Air Base Wing, Eglin AFB, and his/her authorized representative.
( 2 ) The area identified in paragraph (a) of this section and the associated restrictions described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section are in effect 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
( c ) *Enforcement.* ( 1 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, 96 Air Base Wing, Eglin AFB, Florida and such agencies as he/she may designate.
( 2 ) Enforcement of the regulations in this section will be accomplished in accordance with the active security level as defined by the Department of Defense Force Protection Condition (FPCON) System.
[76 FR 75456, Dec. 2, 2011]
#### § 101-27.102-2 Guidelines.

Guidelines for implementing the EOQ principle of stock replenishment are in the GSA Handbook, The Economic Order Quantity Principle and Applications, issued by the Federal Supply Service, GSA. The handbook is identified under national stock number 7610-00-543-6765 in the GSA Supply Catalog, and copies may be obtained by agencies in the same manner as other items in that catalog. The public may purchase the handbook from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.

[41 FR 3858, Jan. 27, 1976]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5537 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5537

  To waive the period of Congressional review of the Child in Need of 
                   Protection Amendment Act of 2000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 25, 2000

Mr. Davis of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To waive the period of Congressional review of the Child in Need of 
                   Protection Amendment Act of 2000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW PERIOD.

    Notwithstanding section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home 
Rule Act (sec. 1-233(c)(1), D.C. Code), the Child in Need of Protection 
Amendment Act of 2000 (D.C. Bill 13-796) shall take effect on the date 
of the enactment of such Act or the date of the enactment of this Act, 
whichever is later.
                                 <all>
```