alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1058

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Charles Dwayne Carter lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ Submitted: May 1, 2023 Filed: May 4, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Charles Carter appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to 24 months in prison and 1 year of supervised release. His

1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief arguing that the revocation

sentence is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review, we conclude that Carter’s sentence was not unreasonable, as there is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Miller , 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing the district court’s decision to revoke supervised release for abuse of discretion); United States v. Larison , 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that a revocation sentence may be unreasonable if the district court fails to consider a relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3353(a) factor, gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or commits a clear error of judgment); United States v. White Face , 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004) (stating that a district court need not mechanically list every § 3553(a) factor when sentencing a defendant upon revocation; all that is required is consideration of relevant matters and some reason for the court’s decision). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6557

SHANNONE WAYNE MCCLINTICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DEAN R. WALKER, Superintendent; ROY ALLEN

COOPER, Attorney General of the State of North

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-316-1-4MU)

Submitted: September 28, 2001 Decided: October 15, 2001

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Robinson Brewer, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Michael F. Easley, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Shannone Wayne McClintick seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny McClintick’s motion for a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

McClintick v. Walker, No. CA-97-316-1-4MU (W.D.N.C. filed Mar. 30,

2001; entered Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit  32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


     Pursuant  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and  (b)  of  section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the  undersigned  officers  of  ITIS  Holdings  Inc.,  a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"),  does  hereby  certify  with respect to the Quarterly Report of ITIS
Holdings  Inc.  on  Form  10-QSB for the first quarter of 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "10-QSB  Report")  that:

     (1)     the  10-QSB  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     the  information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ITIS
Holdings  Inc.

Dated:  May  22,  2006             ITIS  Holdings  Inc.


                                   /s/  Hunter  M.  A.  Carr
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Hunter  M.  A.  Carr
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer


                                   /s/  Joanna  Hoover
                                   -------------------
                                   Joanna  Hoover
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000002852
<NAME> AGWAY INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1994
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     34923
<RECEIVABLES>                                   154687
<ALLOWANCES>                                     12665
<INVENTORY>                                     186331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                547206
<PP&E>                                          527117
<DEPRECIATION>                                  280284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1182767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           393951
<BONDS>                                         551635
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      68824
<COMMON>                                          2755
<OTHER-SE>                                      102277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1182767
<SALES>                                         679424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                712033
<CGS>                                           639047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   656226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 71555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               13938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (26783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (9055)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17728)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (2514)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (20242)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5474 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5474

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective date for 
   an award of disability compensation by the Secretary of Veterans 
   Affairs under section 1151 of such title for persons disabled by 
                treatment or vocational rehabilitation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2000

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the effective date for 
   an award of disability compensation by the Secretary of Veterans 
   Affairs under section 1151 of such title for persons disabled by 
                treatment or vocational rehabilitation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AWARDS OF DISABILITY COMPENSATION MADE BY 
              THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR PERSONS DISABLED BY 
              TREATMENT OR VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION.

    (a) Change in Retroactivity Rule.--Section 5110(c) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``if an application therefor 
is received within one year from such date''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to any award of disability compensation by reason of 
section 1151 of title 38, United States Code, made before, on, or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook in Machine Shop Occupations

              																	Lewis, Richard H.					,	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	Winegarden, Calman R. (Calman Robert). 						*Employment Outlook in Machine Shop Occupations : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 895*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1947,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4346,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32 (a)











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Yearly Report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard F. Govatski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Richard F. Govatski


Richard F. Govatski


Chief Executive Officer





March 30, 2011
§ 102-118.640 If a TSP fails to pay or to appeal an overcharge, what actions will GSA pursue to collect the debt? GSA will pursue debt collection through one of the following methods: ( a ) When an indebted TSP files a claim, GSA will apply all or any portion of the amount it determines to be due the TSP, to the outstanding balance owed by the TSP, under the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR chapter IX) and 41 CFR part 105-55;
( b ) When the action outlined in paragraph (a) of this section cannot be taken by GSA, GSA will instruct one or more Government disbursing offices to deduct the amount due to the agency from an unpaid TSP's bill. A 3-year limitation applies on the deduction of overcharges from amounts due a TSP (31 U.S.C. 3726);
( c ) When collection cannot be accomplished through either of the procedures in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, GSA normally sends two additional demand letters to the indebted TSP requesting payment of the amount due within a specified time. Lacking a satisfactory response, GSA may place a complete stop order against amounts otherwise payable to the indebted TSP by adding the name of that TSP to the Department of the Army “List of Contractors Indebted to the United States”; and/or
( d ) When collection actions, as stated in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section are unsuccessful, GSA may report the debt to the Department of Justice for collection, litigation, and related proceedings, as prescribed in 31 CFR chapter IX.
[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 32326, May 31, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5413 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5413

    To require the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations 
 addressing safety concerns in minimizing delay for automobile traffic 
                      at railroad grade crossings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2000

 Mr. Dingell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations 
 addressing safety concerns in minimizing delay for automobile traffic 
                      at railroad grade crossings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGULATIONS.

    Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue regulations to address 
safety concerns and to minimize delay for automobile traffic on our 
Nation's roads with respect to trains blocking traffic at railroad 
grade crossings.
                                 <all>
```
SERVED: JUNE 13, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0777 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0776 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0869 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012 - 0868 
SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012 - 0874 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0872 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0873 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0904 

POSTPONEMENT 

The matters currently scheduled for July 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19, 2013, inclusive, in the 

U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 5223, Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building, 125 S. State 

Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84138, be and are hereby postPoned. 

0:&~<::[{;{(-i,~u:J 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0776, 2012-0777, 2012-0869, 

2012-0868,2012-0874,2012-0872,2012-0873,2012-0904 

(Civil Penalty Actions) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Director, Government and Legal Affairs 

SkyWest Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

MICHAEL L. DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

TEL: 415-421-2500 

FAX: 415-421-2560 

EMAIL: 1aw@avialex.com 

Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 
• • 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-23722-ALTONAGA/DAMIAN

SARAH LOREDO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CARNIVAL CORPORATION,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER FOLLOWING DISCOVERY HEARING 

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Discovery Memorandum (the 

“Memorandum”) [ECF No. 40], filed June 20, 2023. This matter was referred to the 

undersigned by the Honorable Cecilia M. Altonaga, Chief United States District Judge, 

pursuant to an Order of Referral of all pretrial discovery matters [ECF No. 13]. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(A).

THE COURT has reviewed the Memorandum and Defendant’s Response thereto 

[ECF No. 42], the pertinent portions of the record, and all relevant authorities and is 

otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court also heard from the parties, through their 

counsel, at a Discovery Hearing held on June 28, 2023.

As discussed at the hearing, the Court previously entered an Order regarding the 

requests at issue in Plaintiff’s Memorandum and, in that Order, set time, location, and other 

parameters for Defendant’s obligations in responding to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. See

ECF No. 33. As Defendant points out, Plaintiff did not appeal the Court’s Order at the time

Case 1:22-cv-23722-CMA Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/29/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

but now requests the Court modify its rulings to expand the scope of discovery. The Court 

interprets Plaintiff’s Memorandum as a request for reconsideration of the Court’s prior Order.

A motion for reconsideration may be granted based on three major grounds: (1) an 

intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence; and (3) the need 

to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice. Burger King Corp. v. Ashland Equities, Inc., 

181 F. Supp. 2d 1366, 1369 (S.D. Fla. 2002). In other words, “[t]he only grounds for granting 

a motion for reconsideration ‘are newly-discovered evidence or manifest errors of law or 

fact.’” United States v. Dean, No. 20-11603, 2020 WL 7655426, at *2 (11th Cir. Dec. 23, 2020) 

(per curiam) (quoting Arthur v. King, 500 F.3d 1335, 1343 (11th Cir. 2007) (per curiam)). “A 

party's disagreement with the court's decision, absent a showing of manifest error, is not 

sufficient to demonstrate entitlement to relief.” Id. (citing Jacobs v. Tempur-Pedic Int'l, Inc., 626 

F.3d 1327, 1344 (11th Cir. 2010)).

Plaintiff has not shown any basis warranting reconsideration of the Court’ prior 

Discovery Order. As such, and for the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the relief requested in the Memorandum [ECF 

No. 40] is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 29th day of June, 2023.

_______________________________________

MELISSA DAMIAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies to: Hon. Cecilia M. Altonaga, Chief United States District Judge,

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23722-CMA Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/29/2023 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_____ ____________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

d0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145229

In re CONSERVATORSHIP OF JAMES

CANNON, SR.

_________________________________________

RONALD CANNON, SC: 145229

Appellant. COA: 306630

Wayne Probate:

2011

- 766288

- CA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2012 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                            Mattress Showrooms, Inc.
                                (the Corporation)

We, the  undersigned,  Nelson  Vazquez  (President/Director)  and Douglas Ansell
(Secretary/Director) of the Corporation do hereby certify:

That the board of Directors of the  Corporation  at a meeting duly  convened and
held on the 22nd day of April,  1997, adopted a resolution to amend the original
articles as follows:

Article I is hereby amended to read as follows:

First: The name of the corporation is "International Star, Inc."

Additionally,  The issued and  outstanding  6,000,000  common  shares are hereby
forward  split 5 to 1  (five-to-one)  making the issued and  outstanding  shares
increase from 6,000,000 to 30,000,000  which is a part of the total  100,000,000
authorized capital common shares."

The number of shares of the  Corporation  outstanding and entitled to vote on an
amendment  to the  Articles of  Incorporation  are  6,000,000  (prior to forward
split); that the said change(s) and amendment has been consented to and approved
by a majority vote of the stockholders holding at least a majority of each class
of stock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon."

   /s/ Nelson Vazquez                           /s/ Douglas Ansell
-------------------------                   -------------------------
Nelson Vazquez, President                   Douglas Ansell, Secretary

State Of Nevada     -
                    |     ss.               [NOTARIZED]
County Of Clark     -

         The undersigned Notary Public certified deposes and states that Nelson
Vazquez and Douglas Ansell, personally appeared before me and executed the
foregoing on behalf of the Corporation as its President and Secretary
respectively, this 23rd day of April, 1997.


                                            By:   /s/ Bridget E. Richards
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Notary Public and for said
                                               County and State