alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 9
                                                                     ---------

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS


We refer to our  report  dated  February  13,  2006  evaluating  the  reserves
attributable to Western Oil Sands Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2005
(the "Report").

We hereby consent to references to our name and to the Report in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 40-F to be filed with the United States  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  pursuant  to the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended.  We also  confirm that we have read the Annual  Information  Form and
that we have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the
information  contained  in it that are  derived  from the  Report  or that are
within our  knowledge as a result of the  services we performed in  connection
with the Report.



         /s/ James H. Willmon
         ------------------------------
         James H. Willmon
         GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd.
         Independent Engineers

         Calgary, Canada
         March 27, 2006
#### § 955.19 Notice of hearings.

The Board shall issue an order reasonably in advance of the hearing identifying the time and place thereof.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 15-0436

JOHNESHA MILLER

v.

DART AREA RAPID TRANSIT

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

July 31, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

(Justice Jeff V. Brown not sitting)



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, JOHNESHA MILLER, pay all costs incurred on this

petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 11th day of September, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Zachary Lipshultz of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Lawrence Gene David, and requests that all papers served 

in this case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Dated: April 6, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Zachary Lipshultz

Zachary Lipshultz

Florida Bar No. 123594

Email: zach@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Lawrence Gene David

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 115 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 542 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 542

To reduce the number of Trident ballistic missile submarines subject to 
  a statutory limitation on retirement or dismantlement of strategic 
    nuclear delivery systems and to provide that any funds saved by 
 retiring such submarines should be used for national missile defense 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

  Mr. Foley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce the number of Trident ballistic missile submarines subject to 
  a statutory limitation on retirement or dismantlement of strategic 
    nuclear delivery systems and to provide that any funds saved by 
 retiring such submarines should be used for national missile defense 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF TRIDENT BALLISTIC MISSILE 
              SUBMARINES SUBJECT TO A STATUTORY LIMITATION ON 
              RETIREMENT OR DISMANTLEMENT OF STRATEGIC NUCLEAR DELIVERY 
              SYSTEMS.

    Section 1302(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105-85; 111 Stat. 1948) is amended by 
striking ``18'' and inserting ``14''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON USE OF AMOUNTS SAVED BY REASON OF 
              RETIREMENT OF FOUR TRIDENT BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINES.

    (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that, if the 
Secretary of the Navy should reduce the number of operational Trident 
ballistic missile submarines from the current 18 to 14, then the amount 
otherwise programmed for national missile defense programs for any 
fiscal year after such reduction should be increased by the amount 
saved during that fiscal year by reason of such reduction.
    (b) Amounts To Be Included as Savings.--In determining the amount 
saved by reason of a reduction in operational Trident submarines 
described in subsection (a), there shall be included amounts saved due 
to the submarines taken out of service not being backfitted to carry D-
5 missiles or refueled and otherwise modernized and amounts saved by 
reason of D-5 missiles for those submarines not being procured.
                                 <all>
```
§ 447.32 Post-employment activities. ( a ) Restrictions on the post-employment activities of persons who have been employed by the Postal Service are imposed by 18 U.S.C. 207. The Ethics Reform Act of 1989 includes amendments to 18 U.S.C. 207, which became effective January 1, 1991. Employees who terminated their employment prior to January 1, 1991, are subject to the restrictions imposed under 18 U.S.C. 207 in effect prior to that date, while all other employees are subject to the restrictions imposed under 18 U.S.C. 207 as amended.
( b ) The Office of Government Ethics has issued regulations, contained in 5 CFR part 2637, that implement 18 U.S.C. 207 as in effect prior to January 1, 1991. Employees who terminated their employment with the Postal Service prior to January 1, 1991, may refer to 5 CFR part 2637 for guidance concerning applicable post-employment restrictions, and further guidance may be obtained in accordance with § 447.31 of this part.
( c ) Employees who terminate their postal employment on or after January 1, 1991, are subject to 18 U.S.C. 207 as amended. Guidance concerning post-employment restrictions applicable to such employees may be obtained in accordance with § 447.31 of this part.
[60 FR 47244, Sept. 11, 1995]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

JASON OSBORN,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY 

OF BOSTON,

Defendant(s). /

CASE NO. 1:22-CV-23625-KMM

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Jason Osborn, and Defendant, Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston, by and 

through undersigned counsel, hereby jointly stipulate and move that this cause be dismissed, with 

prejudice, including all claims that were or could have been raised in this action, each party bearing 

its own costs and attorney’s fees.

Dated: May 12, 2023

By: /s/ Cesar Gavidia By: /s/ Lee W. Marcus

 CESAR GAVIDIA, ESQ. LEE W. MARCUS, ESQ.

 Fla. Bar No. 015263 Fla. Bar No. 967076

 DELL & SCHAEFER MARCUS & MYERS, P.A.

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant

 2525 Weston Road 6150 Metrowest Boulevard, Ste 208

 Weston, FL 33331 Orlando FL 32835

 Phone: (954) 620-8300 Phone: (407) 447-2550

 Fax: (954) 922-6864 Fax: (407) 447-2551

 Cesar@diattorney.com Lmarcus@marcusmyerslaw.com

Case 1:22-cv-23625-KMM Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 3055.21 USPS Marketing Mail. ( a ) For each product within the USPS Marketing Mail class, report the on-time service performance (as a percentage rounded to one decimal place).
( b ) For each product within the USPS Marketing Mail class that does not meet its service goal during the reporting period, report the point impact data for the top ten root causes of on-time service performance failures, at the National level, during the previous fiscal year. “Point impact data” means the number of percentage points by which on-time performance decreased due to a specific root cause of failure. Identification and a description of all potential root causes of failure assigned during the previous fiscal year and any changes to the Postal Service's methodology for calculating point impact data shall be included. This requirement shall not apply to USPS Marketing Mail Every Door Direct Mail or USPS Marketing Mail Destination Delivery Unit Entry Saturation Flats.
[88 FR 10039, Feb. 16, 2023]
#### § 946.2 Disposition of property of apparent owners.

Where an apparent owner of property subject to this part is known, the Chief Postal Inspector or delegate will mail, by certified mail to the apparent owner's last known address, written notice describing the property and the procedure for filing a claim for its return (see §§ 946.3 and 946.7). Such claims must be filed within 30 days from the date the notice is postmarked. If the apparent owner of the property fails to file a timely claim, the property is considered abandoned and must be disposed of as provided in § 946.6.
#### § 3.1 Composition and responsibilities of Board.

The composition of the Board is described in 39 U.S.C. 202. The Board directs the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service, reviews the practices and policies of the Postal Service, and directs and controls the expenditures of the Postal Service. Consistent with the broad delegation of authority to the Postmaster General in § 3.5 of these bylaws, and except for those powers, duties, or obligations which are specifically vested by statute in the Governors, as distinguished from the Board of Governors, the Board accomplishes its purposes by monitoring the operations and performance of the Postal Service, and by establishing basic objectives, broad policies, and long-range goals for the Postal Service.
#### § 102-36.200 May we acquire excess personal property for cannibalization purposes by the grantees?

Yes, subject to GSA approval, you may acquire excess personal property for cannibalization purposes. You may be required to provide a supporting statement that indicates disassembly of the item for secondary use has greater benefit than utilization of the item in its existing form and cost savings to the government will result.
### NUMBER 13 - 1 8 - 00 147 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN R E OSCAR FUENTES, BELINDA FUENTES, ZACCHEAUS OLOBA, AND COMFORT OLOBA

O n Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Relators’ Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief

ORDER
Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa

Per Curiam Order
Relator s Oscar Fuentes, Belinda Fuentes, Zaccheaus Oloba, and Comfort Oloba
have f iled a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief in the above

cause on March 16, 2018

. Relators contend that the Honorable Jack Pulcher , presiding judge of the 105th Judicial District Court of Kleberg County, Texas, abused his discretion, leaving relators without an adequate appellate remedy, by granting the real party in interest, Hunter Industries, Ltd.’s motion to transfer venue withou t affording relators notice and an opportunity to respond. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 86, 87.2

Through this original proceeding, relator s seek to vacate the trial court’s February 26, 2018, order transferring venue from Kleb e rg County , Texas to Hays County, Texa s. Through their motion for emergency relief, relator s seek a temporary stay of the trial court’s order until such time as we may fully consider the petition for writ of mandamus

. T he Court requests that the real party in interest , Hunter Industries, L td

. , or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to relators’ motion for emergency relief on or before March 20, 2018 , and to file a response
to t he petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date
of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. Relators’ motion for emergency relief will be CARRIED WITH THE CASE pending further order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed this 16th day of March , 201 8

.
#### § 101-30.101-8 Conversion.

*Conversion* means the changeover from using existing supply classifications, stock numbers, names, and identification data to using those of the Federal Catalog System in all supply operations, from determination of requirements to final disposal.

[41 FR 11308, Mar. 18, 1976]
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 06/17/2008 Search Help More Search Options Printable Version 

### Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Energy Conservation Standard Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Analytical Spreadsheets The Department of Energy prepared the analytical spreadsheets below for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking stage of its energy conservation standards rulemaking on packaged terminal air conditions and packaged terminal heat pumps. 

### NOPR Analytical SpreadsheetsLife-Cycle Cost Spreadsheet ( Excel 2.1 MB )National Impact Analysis ( Excel 3.6 MB )Manufacturer Impact Analysis Spreadsheet (Government Regulatory Impact Model) ( Excel 6.8 MB ) Printable Version EERE Information Center 

### Pa g e 1 of 1 A pp liances and Commercial E qui p ment Standards: Packa g ed Terminal Air Conditioners an d
...

10/3/2008 htt p ://www1.eere.ener gy . g ov/buildin g s/app liance

_ standards/commercial/ p tacs _p thp s

_ s p reads... EERE-2007-BT-STD-0012 COMMENT 03
#### § 101-4.200 Application.

Except as provided in §§ 101-4.205 through 101-4.235(a), these Title IX regulations apply to every recipient and to each education program or activity operated by such recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 09-2596

PLUMBERS' UNION LOCAL NO. 12 PENSION FUND, Individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated; PLUMBERS' & PIPEFITTERS'

WELFARE EDUCATIONAL FUND; NECA-IBEW HEALTH & WELFARE FUND,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION; JOHN P. GRAHAM; NATHAN GORIN;

JOHN McCARTHY; DAVID FINDLAY; ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-AF1;

ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-AF2; ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-AP1;

ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST AR2; ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST AR3; ALTERNATIVE

LOAN TRUST 2006-AR4; ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-WF1; NOMURA

SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC.;

UBS SECURITIES, LLC; CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC.; MERRILL LYNCH,

PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.; GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.; ALTERNATIVE

LOAN TRUST 2006-AR1,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on January 20, 2011, should be

amended as follows.

On page 12, line 10 of 1st full paragraph, replace "freshman"

with "freshmen".

On page 12, line 12 of 1st full paragraph, insert "at" after

"Id."
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(B) AND 15D-14(B)


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Paul R. Cook
------------------------------------
Paul R. Cook
Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  October 14, 2003


<PAGE>
GMAC Mortgage Corporation
100 Witmer Road
P.O. Box 963
Horsham, PA 19044-0963


Exhibit 1
(LOGO) GMAC Mortgage


Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

March 8, 2000

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999,  GMAC Mortgage  Corporation  and
its subsidiaries (the "Company") have complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing  standards (the "Standards") set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
("USAP"),   except  as  specifically  noted  below.  During  1999,  the  Company
experienced significant changes as a result of recent portfolio acquisitions. As
a consequence, noncompliance with one of the Standards was noted, as follows.

Standard: Reconciling items noted on custodial  bank account and related bank
clearing account  reconciliations shall be resolved within ninety (90) calendar
days of their original identification.

During 1999,  reconciling  items  related to custodial  bank  accounts  were not
always  cleared within 90 days of  identification.  As of December 31, 1999, the
Company has  resolved  all  significant  outstanding  reconciling  items and has
enhanced its procedures to monitor and resolve  reconciling items within 90 days
of identification, as required by the Standards.

As of and for this same  period,  the  Company had in effect  fidelity  bond and
errors and  omissions  policy in the amounts of  $150,000,000  and  $50,000,000,
respectively.


R. Michael O'Brien
President & Chief Executive Officer

David M. Applegate
Chief Operating Officer

Edward D. Hughes
Senior Vice President of
Servicing Adminstration
§ 51.7 Equity standard of review. ( a ) A discharge is presumed to be equitable and will not be changed under this section unless the applicant submits evidence sufficient to establish, to the satisfaction of the DRB that: ( 1 ) The policies and procedures under which the applicant was discharged differ in material respects from policies and procedures currently applicable on a service-wide basis to discharges of that type, provided that current policies or procedures represent a substantial enhancement of the rights afforded a party in such proceedings, and there is substantial doubt that the applicant would have received the same discharge if relevant current policies and procedures had been available to the applicant at the time of the discharge proceedings under consideration; or
( 2 ) At the time of issuance, the discharge was inconsistent with standards of discipline in the Coast Guard; or
( 3 ) The applicant's military record and other evidence presented to the DRB, viewed in conjunction with the factors listed in § 51.8 and the regulations under which the applicant was discharged, do not fairly justify the type of discharge received.
( b ) If the applicant was discharged with a characterized discharge before June 15, 1983, a change from the characterized discharge to an uncharacterized discharge will not be considered under the provisions of (a)(1) of this section unless specifically requested by the applicant. A determination that a discharge is inequitable according to the provisions of (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section shall entitle the applicant to a discharge of a type to which the applicant was entitled at the time the original discharge was issued.
§ 102-118.280 Must all transportation payment records, whether they are electronic or paper, undergo a prepayment audit? Yes, all transportation bills and payment records, whether they are electronic or paper, must undergo a prepayment audit with the following exceptions: ( a ) Your agency's prepayment audit program uses a statistical sampling technique of the bills. If your agency chooses to use statistical sampling, all bills must be ( 1 ) Within the specified limits established by the Comptroller General (31 U.S.C. 3521(b)); and
( 2 ) In compliance with the U.S. Government Accountability Office Using Statistical Sampling (GAO/PEMD-10.1.6), Rev. 1992, Chapter 7 Random Selection Procedures obtainable from *http://www.gao.gov ;* or
( b ) The Administrator of General Services grants your agency a specific exemption from the prepayment audit requirement which may include bills determined to be below your agency's threshold, mode or modes of transportation, or for an agency or subagency.
[81 FR 65300, Sept. 22, 2016, as amended at 87 FR 32325, May 31, 2022]
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 20, 2000 / Notices 38263

[FR Doc. 00–15439 Filed 6–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–C

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary; Defense

Science Board Task Force on

Improving Fuel Efficiency of Weapons

Platforms

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board

Task Force on Improving Fuel

Efficiency of Weapons Platforms will

meet in closed session on June 20–21 at

Carderock Division, Naval Surface

Warfare Center, 9500 MacArthur

Boulevard, West Bethesda, MD 20817–

5700.

The mission of the Defense Science

Board is to advise the Secretary of

Defense and the Under Secretary of

Defense for Acquisition and Technology

on scientific and technical matters as

they affect the perceived needs of the

Department of Defense. At this meeting,

The Task Force will review fuelefficient technologies, including new or

improved fuels, engines, Alternative

Fueled Vehicles, and other advanced

technologies and assess their

operational, logistical, cost, and

environmental impacts for a range of

practical implementation scenarios.

Due to critical mission requirements

in finalizing briefings for this Task

Force, there is insufficient time to

provide timely notice required by

Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory

Committee Act and Subsection 101–

6.1015(b) of the GSA Final Rule on

Federal Advisory Committee

Management, 41 CFR Part 101–6, which

further requires publication at least 15

calendar days prior to the meeting of the

Task Force on June 20–21, 2000.

Persons interested in further

information should call Commander

Brian D. Hughes, USN, at (703) 695–

4157.

Dated: June 13, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00–15435 Filed 6–19–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001–10–M

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Senior Executive Service Performance

Review Board

AGENCY: Office of the Inspector General,

Department of Defense (OIG, DoD).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This notice announces the

appointment of the members of the

Senior Executive Service (SES)

Performance Review Board (PRB) for the

OIG, DoD, as required by 5 U.S.C.

4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and

impartial review of SES performance

appraisals and makes recommendations

regarding performance ratings,