alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 551 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 551

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that military 
   reservists who are retained in active status after qualifying for 
 reserve retired pay shall be given credit toward computation of such 
         retired pay for service performed after so qualifying.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

 Mr. McNulty introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that military 
   reservists who are retained in active status after qualifying for 
 reserve retired pay shall be given credit toward computation of such 
         retired pay for service performed after so qualifying.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPUTATION OF YEARS OF SERVICE IN COMPUTING RESERVE RETIRED 
              PAY.

    (a) Credit for Days After Qualifying for Retired Pay.--Section 
12733(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
before the period the following: ``, including the person's days served 
in active status after qualifying for retired pay under this chapter, 
which shall be credited when the person leaves active status''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to any person who qualifies after January 1, 1988, for retired 
pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, or under 
chapter 67 of such title as in effect before December 1, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,386,653
<SECURITIES>                                19,047,484
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,671,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 18,814,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,839,558
<PP&E>                                      20,349,046
<DEPRECIATION>                            (10,803,642)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,807,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,170,988
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,537,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,112,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,807,048
<SALES>                                     10,227,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,227,291
<CGS>                                        6,884,622
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,884,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,520,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                105,568
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,568
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
#### HORACE KELLOGG and another, Respondents, *v.*GEORGE WITHERHEAD, Appellant.

*Statute of frauds.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

This action was brought to recover the price of a quantity of hams alleged to have been sold to the defendant by the plaintiffs. The General Term *held*(following *Bates*v. *Coster,*8 S. C. [1 Hun), 400), that the agreement between the parties constituted a contract for the sale of the hams, and not one for work and labor to be performed upon them; and that, as the requirement of the statute of frauds had not been complied with, the contract was void, and could not be enforced.

*Magone & Holbrook,*for the appellant.

*L. M. & L. K. Soper,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5522

To prohibit United States assistance for the Palestinian Authority and for

programs, projects, and activities in the West Bank and Gaza.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 2000

Mr. WEINER (for himself, Mr. SALMON, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. ROGAN, Mr.

CROWLEY, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey,

Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr.

WEXLER, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. BERMAN,

Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. WAXMAN, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. TURNER, Mr. WU, and Mr.

TALENT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To prohibit United States assistance for the Palestinian Authority and for programs, projects, and activities in the

West Bank and Gaza.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES ASSISTANCE

4 FOR THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY AND THE

5 WEST BANK AND GAZA.

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, United

7 States assistance (other than humanitarian assistance)
2

•HR 5522 IH

1 may not be provided directly or indirectly to the Pales2 tinian Authority (or to any successor or related entity) or

3 for programs, projects, and activities to the West Bank

4 or Gaza unless the President determines and certifies to

5 the Committee on International Relations of the House

6 of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Rela7 tions of the Senate that—

8 (1) the leadership of the Palestinian

9 Authority—

10 (A) has publicly renounced violence as a

11 means of political expression; and

12 (B) has taken all actions within its capac13 ity to bring an end to the violence which com14 menced in early October 2000 in the West

15 Bank and Gaza; and

16 (2) the violence in the West Bank and Gaza has

17 subsided.

Æ
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Anet Hernandez) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Anet Hernandez.

Dated this 13th day of June 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/13/2023 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN ADMIRALTY

Case #: 9:22-cv-81588-AMC

IN THE MATTER OF THE:

COMPLAINT OF CHRISTOPHER MCDERMOTT

AS OWNER OF MOTOR VESSEL FRICKA

BEARING HIN # US-SERV2147H899

FOR EXONERATION 

FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.

Petitioner/Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

M/Y COUNTRY BOY, its engines, tackle,

equipment, electronics, rigging, dinghies,

furniture, appurtenances, etc., in rem, 

CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER FOX, 

in personam,

Third Party Defendants.

_____________________________________/

THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF MCDERMOTT’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

AS TO THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT ONLY DUE TO SETTLEMENT

Third Party Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER MCDERMOTT by and through his

undersigned counsel, hereby voluntarily dismisses with prejudice only the Third Party 

Complaint [DE 6] against the M/Y Country Boy, in rem, and Captain Christopher Fox,

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) as the matter was dismissed

before an Answer or Motion for Summary Judgment was served by the Third Party 

Defendants. With regard to the dismissal, each party is to bear their own costs and 

attorney’s fees. This Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in limited to the Third Party 

Case 9:22-cv-81588-DMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2022 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Complaint as the Petitioner, CHRISTOPHER MCDERMOTT, will continue with his 

Complaint for Exoneration and/or Limitation of Liability [DE 1]. 

Respectfully Submitted,

/s Andrew N. Mescolotto

Andrew N. Mescolotto (28141)

anm@fertig.com 

FERTIG & GRAMLING

200 Southeast 13th Street

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316

Telephone: 954-763-5020 

Facsimile: 954-763-5412

Attorneys for the Petitioner/Third Party Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by 

CM/ECF on November 2, 2022 on all counsel or parties of record on the Service List 

below.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s Andrew N. Mescolotto

Andrew N. Mescolotto (28141)

anm@fertig.com 

FERTIG & GRAMLING

SERVICE LIST

ANDREW N. MESCOLOTTO (28141)

FERTIG AND GRAMLING

200 Southeast 13th Street

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316

PH: (954) 763-5020

FX: (954) 763-5412

anm@fertig.com

Attorneys for the Petitioner/Third Party

Plaintiff

Via CM/ECF

No Claimants or Third Party Defendants 

have appeared in this case.

Case 9:22-cv-81588-DMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2022 Page 2 of 2
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09
- 13
- 00 490
- CV



### _________________

IN RE JOHN S. MORGAN AND JOHN S. MORGAN, P.C., D/B/A M O RGAN LAW FIRM

________________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION In a petition for writ of mandamus, John S. Morgan and John S. Morgan, P.C., d/b/a Morgan Law Firm, seek to compel the trial court to vacate its order of August 30, 2013, which denied Relators’ motion to disqualify counsel for the real parties in interest. The record sub mitted with the petition consists of documents

c oncerning other cases, correspondence discussing settlement negotiations, the
motion and supplemental motion Relators filed with the trial court , and the trial
court’s order . The mandamus record does not contain the parties’ live pleadings or the response filed by the real parties in interest, Harris, Duesler & Hatfield, L.L.P.,2 James Harris, Jr., and Collin Cobb

. Relators have not presented a mandamus
record that includes a copy of all document s material to their claim , which ass erts
that the real parties in interest must be disqualified

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a);
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k). After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude that Rel a tors have not established the trial court clearly abused
its discretion. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered November 14, 2013 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
§ 101-4.435 Employment assistance to students. ( a ) *Assistance by recipient in making available outside employment.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making employment available to any of its students: ( 1 ) Shall assure itself that such employment is made available without discrimination on the basis of sex; and
( 2 ) Shall not render such services to any agency, organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of sex in its employment practices.
( b ) *Employment of students by recipients.* A recipient that employs any of its students shall not do so in a manner that violates §§ 101-4.500 through 101-4.550.
Submitted on remand March 3,

reversed and remanded with instructions September 6,

respondent’s motion for reconsideration filed September 22

allowed by opinion November 15, 1995

See 137 Or App 598, 905 P2d 1184 (1995)

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Warren N. Bowen, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and University of Oregon, *Petitioners, v.*Warren N. BOWEN, *Respondent.*

(WCB 91-15616; CA A77263)

901 P2d 925

David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Edward J. Harri argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Malagon, Moore, Johnson, Jensen & Correll.

*223Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

DEITS, P. J.

*224DEITS, P. J.

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in the light of *Martin v. City of Albany,*320 Or 175, 880 P2d 926 (1994), and *Niccum v. South Coast Lumber Co.,*320 Or 189, 880 P2d 923 (1994). *SAIF v. Bowen,*320 Or 501, 887 P2d 787 (1995).

The issue in this case is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board had jurisdiction to determine the appropriateness of proposed medical treatment for claimant.1 The Supreme Court’s decisions in *Martin*and *Niccum*held that the Board did have jurisdiction. However, the amendments to the workers’ compensation law made by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332, are applicable here because this case was pending before the courts on the effective date of the petition. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995). Those amendments give the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services exclusive authority to decide whether proposed medical treatment is excessive, inappropriate, ineffectual or in violation of applicable rules. Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332, sections 41 and 50; *Newell v. SAIF,*136 Or App 280, 902 P2d 600 (1995). Accordingly, the Board lacked jurisdiction to consider this question. We remand to the Board with instructions to dismiss claimant’s petition to it.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss petition.

1

 SAIF also assigns error to the Board’s award of attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1). In light of our conclusion that the Board lacked jurisdiction, it is unnecessary to address this question.
529 P.2d 1261

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry Charles BRUHN, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 11256.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Dec. 4, 1974.

William. H. Foster, Pros. Atty., Idaho County and Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Grange-ville, for State.

No appearance for defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The state has appealed from an order of the trial court entered at the close of its case in chief, the effect of which order was to grant the defendant’s motions for judgments of acquittal on the charges of kidnapping in the second degree and rape.

This attempted appeal is not within the purview of I.C. § 19-2804,1 and hence, this appeal is dismissed. State v. Berlin, 95 Idaho 225, 506 P.2d 122 (1973); State v. Grady, 31 Idaho 272, 170 P. 85 (1918).

1

. I.C. § 19-2804. “Appeal by the state.— An appeal may be taken by the state:

1. From a judgment for the defendant on a demurrer to the Indictment or information.

2. From an order, entered before the trial of a person charged with a criminal offense, which directs the return of seized property, suppresses evidence, or otherwise denies the prosecution the use of evidence at trial if the prosecuting attorney and the attorney general certify to the judge who granted such motion that the appeal is taken in good faith, and is not taken for the purpose of delay, and that the evidence suppressed constitutes a necessary portion of the state’s case to prove the charge pending against the defendant. No such property or evidence shall be returned until the expiration of ten (10) days from and after the date on which the order was entered. An appeal by the state pursuant to this subsection shall stay the return of such property or evidence and shall constitute a bar to the prosecution of the case unless such order is reversed upon appeal. Appeals pursuant to this subsection shall be expedited by the Supreme Court and shall receive priority over all other criminal and civil appeals.

3. From an order granting a new trial.

4. From an order arresting judgment.

5. From an order made after judgment affecting the substantial rights of the prosecution.

6. From any ruling of the trial judge during the course of the trial on the receipt or rejection of testimony, and from any ruling of the trial judge on the giving or refusal to give instructions to the jury.”
ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY


Exhibit 99.2


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allen Organ
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nathan S.
Eckhart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and
2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result
  of operations of the Company.



/s/NATHAN S. ECKHART
Nathan S. Eckhart
Chief Financial Officer
November 7, 2002
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report,  as amended,  of GoAmerica,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Francis J. Elenio,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: April 29, 2003

                                                   By: /s/ Francis J. Elenio
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Francis J. Elenio
                                                       Chief Financial Officer



This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been  provided  to  GoAmerica,  Inc.  and will be retained by
GoAmerica,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.




<PAGE>
§ 95.005 Applicability. ( a ) This part is applicable to a vessel (except those excluded by 46 U.S.C. 2109) operated on waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and to a vessel owned in the United States on the high seas. This includes a foreign vessel operated on waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
( b ) This part is also applicable at all times to vessels inspected, or subject to inspection, under Chapter 33 of Title 46 United States Code.
[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47532, Dec. 14, 1987; CGD 84-009, 53 FR 13117, Apr. 21, 1988]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C.  20549

                                    FORM 10-Q

                                QUARTERLY REPORT

                        PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
                                     of the
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                    For the quarter ended September 30, 1998


                             PLANET RESOURCES, INC.
                      (Formerly Allied Silver-Lead Company)

             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                                    DELAWARE
                                (Formerly Idaho)
          (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

              1-7149                              82-0277987
     (Commission  File  Number)     (IRS  Employer  Identification  Number)

                                 C/O A.W. DUGAN
                           1415 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3100
                              HOUSTON, TEXAS  77002
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (713) 658-1142
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



     Indicate  by  check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all documents
and  reports  required  to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange  Act  of 1934 during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period
that  the Registrant was required to file such reports, and (2) has been subject
to  such  filing  requirements  for  the  past  90  days.
          X       Yes            No
          -

     Indicate  the  number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of  common  stock,  as  of  the  latest  practicable  date.

          Class                    Outstanding  at  September  30,  1998
          -----                    -------------------------------------
     Common  Stock,  $.001  par  value     1,605,818


                                    FORM 10-Q

                             PLANET RESOURCES, INC.
                      (Formerly Allied Silver-Lead Company)

                                INDEX AND REPORT



PART  1.     FINANCIAL  INFORMATION

     Planet  Resources, Inc. is a mining company in the development stage and is
not required to file Part I of Form 10-Q (Financial Information) under the terms
of  Rule  13(a)  -13(b).


PART  II.     OTHER  INFORMATION  AND  SIGNATURES

     The  Company  has  reviewed  the  reporting requirements of Part II of Form
10-Q.  No  corporate  or  other activities have occurred which require a report.

     No  exhibits  are  attached.

     Pursuant  to  the  requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
the  Registrant  has  duly  caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned  thereunto  duly  authorized.

PLANET  RESOURCES,  INC.
(formerly  Allied  Silver-Lead  Company)



By:  /s/A.W.  Dugan
   ----------------
      A.W.  Dugan,  Chief  Executive  Officer
            and  Chairman  of  the  Board


Date:  October  26,  1998
#### § 102-118.110 Where can I find the rules governing the use of a Government Transportation Request?

The “U.S. Government Passenger Transportation—Handbook” contains information on how to prepare this GTR form. This handbook is available at *https://www.gsa.gov/transaudits.*

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 57620, Sept. 24, 2004: 74 FR 30475, June 26, 2009; 87 FR 32324, May 31, 2022]