alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 958.9 Responsibilities and authority of presiding officer. ( a ) The Presiding Officer shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid unnecessary delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceeding is made.
( b ) The Presiding Officer's authority includes, but is not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Establishing, upon adequate notice to all parties, the date and time of the oral hearing, if any, as well as, in accordance with § 958.7, selecting the hearing site;
( 2 ) Holding conferences, by telephone or in person, to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious resolution of the proceeding;
( 3 ) Continuing or recessing the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 4 ) Administering oaths and affirmations to witnesses;
( 5 ) Ruling on all offers, motions, requests by the parties, and other procedural matters;
( 6 ) Issuing any notices, orders, or memoranda to the parties concerning the proceedings;
( 7 ) Regulating the scope and timing of discovery;
( 8 ) Regulating the course of the hearing and the conduct of the parties and their representatives;
( 9 ) Examining witnesses;
( 10 ) Receiving, ruling on, excluding, or limiting evidence in order to assure that relevant, reliable and probative evidence is elicited on the issues in dispute, but irrelevant, immaterial or repetitious evidence is excluded;
( 11 ) Deciding cases, upon motion of a party, in whole or in part by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 12 ) Establishing the record in the case; and
( 13 ) Issuing a written Initial Decision containing findings of fact, conclusions of law, and determinations with respect to whether civil penalties, clean-up costs and/or damages for mailing hazardous materials and/or related violations under 39 U.S.C. 3018 should be imposed, and if so, the amounts thereof, after taking into account the penalty considerations contained in 39 U.S.C. 3018(e).
§ 101-5.102 Definitions. ( a ) *Centralized services* means those central supporting and administrative services and facilities provided to occupying agencies in Federal buildings or nearby locations in lieu of each agency providing the same services or facilities for its own use. This includes those common administrative services provided by a Cooperative Administrative Support Unit (CASU). It does not include such common building features as cafeterias, blind stands, loading platforms, auditoriums, incinerators, or similar facilities. Excluded are interagency fleet management centers established pursuant to Public Law 766, 83d Congress, and covered by part 101-39 of this chapter.
( b ) *Occupying agency* means any Federal agency assigned space in a building or complex for which GSA has oversight of, or responsibility for the functions of operation and maintenance in addition to space assignment.
( c ) *Cooperative Administrative Support Unit (CASU)* means an organized mechanism for providing administrative services for agencies in multi-tenant federally occupied buildings.
[56 FR 33873, July 24, 1991]
nbr_EX10_5


		
			Exhibit 10.5
		

		
			 
		

		
			FIRST AMENDMENT TO
		

		
			NABORS INDUSTRIES, INC.
		

		
			EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
		

		
			(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2017)
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			WHEREAS, Nabors Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) has heretofore established the Nabors Industries, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2017 (the “Plan”), for the benefit of its and its participating affiliates’ eligible employees; and
		

		
			WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows effective as of August 9, 2019:
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			Section 7.8(g) of the Plan shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:




		
			“(g)A Participant shall be entitled to receive distribution of all or such portion of the Vested Interest in his Accounts, in a single lump sum payment, under any other circumstance permitted under Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-3(j)(4) or any successor regulation thereto or prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in generally applicable guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, including, without limitation, a distribution of all or a portion of the Vested Interest in such Participant’s Accounts to an alternate payee (as defined in Section 414(p)(8) of the Code) pursuant to a domestic relations order (as defined in Section 414(p)(1)(B) of the Code); and”
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			Except as amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.




		
			 
		

		
			[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank;
		

		
			Signature Page Follows]
		

		
			 
		

		
			


		 





		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 9th day of August, 2019, effective for all purposes as provided above.
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						NABORS INDUSTRIES, INC.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/Michael Rasmuson

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Michael Rasmuson

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Vice President, General Counsel &

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Chief Compliance Officer
#### § 501.5 Burden of proof standard.

The burden of proof is on the Postal Service in administrative determinations of suspension and revocation under § 501.6 and administrative sanctions under § 501.12. Except as otherwise indicated in those sections, the standard of proof shall be the preponderance-of-evidence standard.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of Purple Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John R. Ferron, Principal Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition ofthe Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated: March 31, 2009 

/s/ John R. Ferron 

John R. Ferron 

Principal Financial Officer 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Case 1:00-cr-00939-AJ Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:00-cr-00939-AJ Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:00-cr-00939-AJ Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 3 of 3
#### § 953.17 Ex parte communications.

The provisions of 5 U.S.C. 551(14), 556(d), and 557(d) prohibiting ex parte communications are made applicable to proceedings under these rules of practice.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Roberto Martínez of the law firm Colson Hicks Eidson, 

P.A. appears as counsel for Defendant Naomi Osaka, and requests that all papers served in this 

case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Dated: April 14, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Florida Bar No. 305596

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Naomi Osaka

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 136 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS STATEMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             314
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                       819
<INVENTORY>                                     53,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,855
<PP&E>                                          87,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,608
<BONDS>                                            174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,864
<SALES>                                        216,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,714
<CGS>                                          165,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  165,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   195
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,021
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,555
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,466
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.70
        

</TABLE>
§ 101-39.101 Notice of intention to begin a study. The Administrator, GSA, will ascertain the possibilities of economies to be derived through the establishment of a fleet management system in a specific geographical area. After preliminary investigation, he or she will notify the head of each agency concerned at least 30 calendar days in advance of the intent to conduct a study to develop data and justification as to the feasibility of establishing a fleet management system. The notification, in writing, will include: ( a ) The approximate geographical area to be included in the study, including a defined mandatory use service area and an optional use service area; and
( b ) The date on which the study will begin.
[51 FR 11023, Apr. 1, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 59887, Nov. 26, 1991]
Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2022 Page 1 of 4Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2022 Page 2 of 4Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2022 Page 3 of 4Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/14/2022 Page 4 of 4
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 23, 2021

No. 04-21-00313-CR

David GREENWOOD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CRW1707142

Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On November 23, 2021, the court reporter filed a notification of late record indicating 

technical issues will prevent timely filing of trial exhibits by the November 29, 2021 deadline to 

file the reporter’s record. Other than the trial exhibits, the court reporter timely filed the 

reporter’s record. Because unresolved technical issues form the basis of the court reporter’s 

request, the court reporter did not estimate a particular length of time in requesting an extension.

We GRANT the reporter’s request for extension. The court reporter is ORDERED to file

with this court no later than December 10, 2021, either (1) the remainder of the reporter’s 

record; or (2) if technical issues prevent timely filing of the remainder of the reporter’s record, a 

notification of late record with an estimate for when the reporter’s record will be completed.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5478 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5478

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire by donation 
  suitable land to serve as the new location for the home of Alexander 
 Hamilton, commonly known as the Hamilton Grange, and to authorize the 
         relocation of the Hamilton Grange to the acquired land.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 2 of 
Public Law 87-438, as amended by Public Law 100-701; 102 Stat. 4640; 16 
U.S.C. 431 note) is amended--
        (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The Secretary 
    of the Interior''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Relocation of Hamilton Grange.--The Secretary is authorized 
to acquire by donation from the City of New York, New York, a parcel of 
land or suitable interests in such land, not to exceed 1 acre, to serve 
as the new location for the home of Alexander Hamilton, commonly known 
as the Hamilton Grange, and to relocate the Hamilton Grange to such 
land. The acquired land or interests in land shall be in close 
proximity to the original location of Hamilton Grange and shall be 
added to and administered as part of the memorial.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### § 965.12 Appeal.

Within 10 days after receipt by the parties of the initial or tentative decision, either party may file an appeal to the Judicial Officer. The Judicial Officer, or by delegation the Associate Judicial Officer, in his or her sole discretion, also may review the initial or tentative decision on his or her own initiative. If an appeal is denied, the initial or tentative decision becomes the final agency decision upon the issuance of such denial. If an appeal is not filed and the Judicial Officer, or by delegation the Associate Judicial Officer does not review the initial or tentative decision on his or her own initiative, a final order will be issued. The Judicial Officer's decision on appeal or his or her final order is the final agency decision with no further agency review or appeal rights.

[76 FR 15219, Mar. 21, 2011]
**EXHIBIT 24.1****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Mark A.Kopser and John J. Wellik and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full powerof substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United Surgical PartnersInternational, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposesas he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of saidattorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.              /s/ Donald E. Steen   Donald E. Steen
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                       CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allen Telecom
Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, I, Robert G. Paul, President and
Chief Executive Officer of Allen Telecom Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: (1) such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Allen Telecom Inc. for the quarter ended September 30,
2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in such Quarterly
Report of Form 10-Q of Allen Telecom Inc. for the quarter ended September 30,
2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and
results of operations of Allen Telecom Inc.

Date:  November 13, 2002                    By:      /s/ Robert G. Paul
       -----------------                       --------------------------------
                                                          Robert G. Paul
                                                            President
                                                    (Chief Executive Officer)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6283** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , District Judge. ( 3:05

- cr - 00231

- JRS

- 1 )

Submitted : June 20, 2013 Decided: June 26, 2013

Before DUNCAN and DAVIS , Circuit Judges
. *

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

* The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46 ( d) (2006).2 PER CURIAM: Kareem Jamal Currence , a federal prisoner, seeks to
app eal the district court ’ s order construing his petition for a writ of audita querela as a successive and unauthorized 28
U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. Currence has also filed a motion for a transcript at Government expense. The district court’ s order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wron g. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, a nd that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Currence has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Currence’s motion3 for a transcript at Government expense, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 5.47 Coast Guard ensign. ( a ) *Description.* The Coast Guard ensign is described in 33 CFR 23.15.
( b ) *Display.* Vessels that have been accepted as facilities and that have a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or non-commissioned officer onboard shall display the Coast Guard ensign in place of the Auxiliary patrol ensign while on patrol, whether or not the vessel is underway. The Coast Guard ensign must be displayed at the mast head or from the most conspicuous hoist.