alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

               CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB


     I, Joanna Hoover, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ITIS Holdings
Inc., a Nevada Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2005
---------------------
/s/ Joanna Hoover
-----------------
Name: Joanna Hoover
Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Western  Financial  Corporation
on Form  10-KSB for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 175.15 Personal flotation devices required. Except as provided in §§ 175.17 and 175.25: ( a ) No person may use a recreational vessel unless— ( 1 ) At least one wearable PFD is on board for each person;
( 2 ) Each PFD is used in accordance with any requirements on the approval label; and
( 3 ) Each PFD is used in accordance with any requirements in its owner's manual, if the approval label makes reference to such a manual.
( b ) No person may use a recreational vessel 16 feet or more in length unless one throwable PFD is onboard in addition to the total number of wearable PFDs required in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) No person may operate a recreational vessel under way with any child under 13 years old aboard unless each such child is either— ( 1 ) Wearing an appropriate PFD approved by the Coast Guard; or
( 2 ) Below decks or in an enclosed cabin.
[CGD 81-023, 55 FR 32034, Aug. 6, 1990, as amended by CGD 92-045, 58 FR 41608, Aug. 4, 1993; USCG-2000-8589, 67 FR 42493, June 24, 2002; USCG-2013-0263, 79 FR 56499, Sept. 22, 2014]
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice)

Stephen Neal Zack

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Richard Govatski, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NMXS.com, Inc.

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this amended yearly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended yearly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended yearly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended yearly report;

 

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the a registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended yearly report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended yearly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

(c) presented in this amended yearly report my conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date

 

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

 

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.  I have indicated in this amended yearly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Dated: March 31, 2006

 

|   | /s/ Richard Govatski |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | Richard Govatski     |  
 

Chief Executive			Officer

  
 

 

 

 

 

  |
Exhibit 32
                        American Airlines, Inc.
                             Certification
       Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                          United States Code)


Pursuant   to  section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act   of   2002
(subsections  (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63  of  title  18,
United  States  Code), each of the undersigned officers  of  American
Airlines,  Inc.,  a Delaware corporation (the Company),  does  hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
(the  Form  10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information  contained  in  the Form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in  all
material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date:  July 22, 2004               /s/ Gerard J. Arpey
                                   Gerard J. Arpey
                                   President, Chairman and
                                   Chief Executive Officer

Date:  July 22, 2004               /s/ James A. Beer
                                   James A. Beer
                                   Senior Vice President and
                                   Chief Financial Officer



The  foregoing  certification is being furnished solely  pursuant  to
section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections  (a)  and
(b)  of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and
is  not  being  filed  as  part of the Form 10-Q  or  as  a  separate
disclosure document.
cnat-ex103_174.htm



Exhibit 10.3

 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is dated as of the July 31, 2019, by and between Conatus Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the “Company”), and Keith W. Marshall, Ph.D. (“Employee”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, effective as of August 31, 2017 (“Original Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Original Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the parties agree as follows:

1.Section 1(e)(iii) of the Original Agreement.  Section 1(e)(iii) of the Original Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:

“(iii)a material change in the geographic location at which Employee must perform his or her duties (and the Company and Employee agree that any requirement that Employee be based at any place outside a 25-mile radius of his or her place of employment as of the Effective Date, except for reasonably required travel on the Company’s or any successor’s or affiliate’s business that is not materially greater than such travel requirements prior to the Effective Date, shall be considered a material change); or”

2.Miscellaneous.  This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Original Agreement.  All other terms and provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified herein.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts made and to be performed wholly within such State, and without regard to the conflicts of laws principles thereof.  This Amendment may not be amended or modified otherwise than by a written agreement executed by the parties hereto or their respective successors and legal representatives.

(Signature Page Follows)

 

 

 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date(s) set forth below.

 


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
CONATUS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Dated:
	
July 31, 2019
	
 
	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Steven J. Mento, Ph.D.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Name:
	
 
	
Steven J. Mento, Ph.D.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Title:
	
 
	
President & Chief Executive Officer

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
EMPLOYEE

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Dated:
	
July 31, 2019
	
 
	
/s/ Keith W. Marshall, Ph.D.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Keith W. Marshall, Ph.D.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN PEREZ-DELZAS, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-72047 

Agency No. A209-168-721 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Kevin Perez-Delzas, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily dismissing 

his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for 

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-72047 

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 

1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We review de novo the legal question of whether a particular 

social group is cognizable, except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s 

interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations. Id. at 1241-42. We deny 

the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Perez-Delzas

failed to establish that the harm he experienced rose to the level of persecution. 

See Duran-Rodriguez v. Barr, 918 F.3d 1025, 1028-29 (9th Cir. 2019) (record did 

not compel the conclusion that harm rose to the level of persecution). 

The agency did not err in concluding that Perez-Delzas did not establish 

membership in a cognizable particular social group. See Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 

1125, 1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular 

social group, “[t]he applicant must ‘establish that the group is (1) composed of 

members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with 

particularity, and (3) socially distinct within the society in question’” (quoting 

Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014))); see also SantosLemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2008) (proposed group “young 

men in El Salvador resisting gang violence” lacked particularity), abrogated on 
3 20-72047 

other grounds by Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2013) (en 

banc). 

Thus, Perez-Delzas’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Perez-Delzas failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or 

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador. See

Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1033-35 (9th Cir. 2014) (concluding that 

petitioner did not establish the necessary “state action” for CAT relief). 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 560

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 5, 1999

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at the intersection of Comercio and San

Justo Streets, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Jose ́

V. Toledo Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.
2

HR 560 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at the intersection of Comercio and San Justo

6 Streets, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, shall be known and

7 designated as the ‘‘Jose ́ V. Toledo Federal Building and

8 United States Courthouse’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

12 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec13 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jose ́ V.

14 Toledo Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### § 102-118.225 What constitutes final receipt of shipment?

Final receipt of the shipment occurs when the consignee or a TSP acting on behalf of the consignee with the agency's permission, fully signs and dates both the delivering TSP's documents and the consignee's copy of the same documents indicating delivery and/or explaining any delay, loss, damage, or shrinkage of shipment.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 71021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28227]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8530]

Certification Under the Department of State, Foreign Operations, 
and Related Programs Appropriations Act

Certification Pursuant to Section 7041(a) of the Department of State, 
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (DIV. 
I, Pub. L. 112-74) as Carried Forward by the Full Year Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (DIV. F, Pub. L. 113-6)

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State 
pursuant to section 7041(a) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74), as carried forward by the Full Year Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6), I hereby certify that 
the Government of Egypt is meeting its obligations under the 1979 
Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register and, 
along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be 
reported to Congress.

    Dated: May 3, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.

    Editorial Note: This document arrived at the Federal Register on 
November 20, 2013.
[FR Doc. 2013-28227 Filed 11-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
```
# Sheet1

# image1.png
#### § 965.2 Scope of rules.

The rules in this part shall be applicable to mail dispute cases forwarded to the Judicial Officer pursuant to Postal Operations Manual section 616.21.

[76 FR 15219, Mar. 21, 2011]