alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4557-N-24]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 16, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clifford Taffet, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                    v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                    No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: June 8, 2000.

Fred Karnas, Jr., 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 00-14938  Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
#### § 966.11 Appeal.

The initial or tentative decision will become the final agency decision thirty (30) days after its issuance unless, before the expiration of that time, a party files an appeal with the Judicial Officer, or the Judicial Officer, in his or her sole discretion, elects to conduct a review of the decision on his or her own initiative. During such review or appeal consideration, the Judicial Officer will accept all findings of fact in the original decision unless clearly erroneous. If following appeal or review, the Judicial Officer affirms the original decision, that decision becomes the final agency decision with no further right of appeal within the agency.

[77 FR 65106, Oct. 25, 2012]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5553

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to establish, for purposes

of disability determinations under such title, a uniform minimum level

of earnings, for demonstrating ability to engage in substantial gainful

activity, at the level currently applicable solely to blind individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to establish,

for purposes of disability determinations under such title,

a uniform minimum level of earnings, for demonstrating

ability to engage in substantial gainful activity, at the

level currently applicable solely to blind individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. UNIFORM MINIMUM LEVEL OF EARNINGS FOR

4 DEMONSTRATING ABILITY TO ENGAGE IN

5 SUBSTANTIAL GAINFUL ACTIVITY.

6 Section 223(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42

7 U.S.C. 423(d)(4)) is amended, in the second sentence, by
2

•HR 5553 IH

1 striking ‘‘No individual who is blind shall be regarded’’

2 and inserting ‘‘No individual shall be regarded’’.

3 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to

5 monthly insurance benefits for months after December

6 2000.

Æ
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5560

To amend the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 to extend

energy assistance to households headed by certain senior citizens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. WEINER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and

the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act

of 1981 to extend energy assistance to households headed

by certain senior citizens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Energy Assist5 ance Targeted for Seniors Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

7 The Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of

8 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8621 et seq.) is amended—
2

•HR 5560 IH

1 (1) in the heading of title XXVI, by inserting

2 ‘‘AND SENIOR’’ after ‘‘LOW-INCOME’’;

3 (2) in section 2601, by inserting ‘‘and Senior’’

4 after ‘‘Low-Income’’;

5 (3) in section 2603—

6 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (6)

7 through (9) as paragraphs (7) through (10), re8 spectively; and

9 (B) by inserting after paragraph (5) the

10 following new paragraph:

11 ‘‘(6) The term ‘‘low-income household’’ includes

12 a household described in section 2605(b)(2)(C).’’;

13 (4) in section 2604(d)(2), by striking ‘‘(A) and

14 (B)’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘(A), (B),

15 and (C)’’;

16 (5) in section 2605(b)—

17 (A) in paragraph (2)—

18 (i) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of sub19 paragraph (A);

20 (ii) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of

21 subparagraph (B); and

22 (iii) by adding at the end the fol23 lowing new subparagraph:

24 ‘‘(C) households with incomes which do not

25 exceed an amount equal to the State median in-
3

•HR 5560 IH

1 come, with at least 50 percent of the household

2 income attributable to persons who are at least

3 65 years old;’’;

4 (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘clauses

5 (2)(A) and (2)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘subpara6 graphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (2)’’;

7 and

8 (C) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘clause

9 (2)(B)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs (B) or

10 (C) of paragraph (2)’’;

11 (6) in section 2607A(b), by inserting ‘‘and sen12 ior’’ after ‘‘to the low-income’’; and

13 (7) in section 2607B(a)—

14 (A) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘and

15 senior’’ after ‘‘low-income’’; and

16 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘fami17 lies’’ and inserting ‘‘households’’.

18 SEC. 3. CONFORMING REFERENCES.

19 Any reference in Federal law or regulations to the

20 Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 or to

21 the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance program shall

22 be deemed to be a reference to the Low-Income and Senior

23 Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 or to the Low-In-
4

•HR 5560 IH

1 come and Senior Home Energy Assistance program, as

2 appropriate.

Æ
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG
Ernst & Young LLP
One Columbus
10 West Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215-3400
Phone: (614)224-5678
Fax: (614)2243939
www.ey.com

Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
The Huntington Mortgage Company

We have examined  management's  assertion,  included in the accompanying  report
titled Report of  Management,  that The  Huntington  Mortgage  Company  (HMC), a
wholly-owned  subsidiary  of The  Huntington  National  Bank,  complied with the
minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) during
the year ended December 31, 1999. Management is responsible for HMC's compliance
with  those  requirements.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an  opinion  on
management's assertion about HMC's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  conducted  in  accordance  with   attestation   standards
established  by the  American  Institute of Certified  Public  Accountants  and,
accordingly,   included  examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  HMC's
compliance with those  requirements  and performing such other  procedures as we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on HMC's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that HMC complied with the aforementioned
requirements  during the year ended December 31, 1999 is fairly  stated,  in all
material respects.

This  report is  intended  solely  for the  information  and use of the board of
directors,  management, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal National
Mortgage  Association,  HMC's  private  investors  and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


Ernst & Young LLP
March 8,2000

Ernst and Young LLP is a member of Ernst Young International, Ltd.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.21 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982, 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983, and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

#### § 101-6.2113 May the Administrator waive any provision of these regulations?

In an emergency, the Administrator may waive any provision of these regulations.
#### §§ 101-26.505-4-101-26.505-6 [Reserved]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30453

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT HILLS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-167-E

- - - - - - - - - -

December 11, 1996

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Hills appeals his conviction and sentence for being a

convicted felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 922(g)(1). Hills argues that his two prior Louisiana

convictions were insufficient to be predicate felonies for

purposes of § 922(g)(1). Contrary to Hills’ contention, his 1972

conviction did not result in an automatic pardon upon the

completion of his sentence. See State v. Baxter, 357 So. 2d 271,
No. 96-30453

- 2 -

273 (La. 1978). Because the 1972 conviction was a proper

predicate felony under § 922(g)(1), we do not address Hills’

contention concerning his 1994 Louisiana conviction.

Hills attempts to argue the propriety of the sentencing

range used by the district court. He fails to provide an

argument. Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(6); see United States v.

Maldonado, 42 F.3d 906, 910 n.7 (5th Cir. 1995). Hills’

remaining contentions, concerning the lack of a motion for

downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, do not rise to

the level of plain error. See United States v. Calverley, 37

F.3d 160, 162 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct.

1266 (1995).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)   In connection with the Annual Report of Health Enhancement Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Janet L. Crance, Principal Administrative Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     Date:  March 31, 2008/s/ Janet L. CranceJanet L. CranceChief Administrative OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer    A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### § 101-29.301-1 Policies and procedures.

The Administrator of General Services is responsible for establishing policies and procedures, in coordination with the other agencies, for the preparation, coordination, approval, issuance, and maintenance of product descriptions in the Federal series of specifications, standards, and CID's.
§ 102-3.95 What principles apply to the management of advisory committees? Agencies are encouraged to apply the following principles to the management of their advisory committees: ( a ) *Provide adequate support and access.* Before establishing an advisory committee, agencies should identify requirements and ensure that adequate resources are available to support anticipated activities. Considerations related to support could include work and meeting space, necessary technology, supplies and equipment (e.g., adequate virtual meeting capabilities), Federal staff support, access to key decisionmakers, and member access to meetings (e.g., travel reimbursement). These considerations should also include support for access to communication modes that are inclusive of individuals with limited English proficiency or individuals with disabilities (e.g., adequate virtual meeting capabilities). These considerations should also include whether there are physical barriers to attending in-person meetings.
( b ) *Practice openness.* Agencies should seek to be as transparent, equitable, inclusive, accessible, and timely as possible when providing public access to advisory committee activities and materials. Agencies should minimize, to the extent possible, closing or partially closing meetings, and are encouraged where appropriate to open subcommittee meetings to the public. Agencies should also create public facing websites at both the agency and advisory committee level to help the public understand an agency's advisory committee program, and use additional notification methods, as appropriate, to reach advisory committee stakeholders, pursuant to sec. 10 of the Act (codified at 5 U.S.C. 1009). Such websites must be in compliance with E.O. 13166, relevant sections of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 794, and the 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA). Section 3(e) of 21st Century IDEA requires any public Federal agency website created after December 2018 to be in compliance with the website standards of the Technology Transformation Services of the General Services Administration. IDEA, Public Law 115-336, 132 Stat. 5025.
( c ) *Promote diversity, equity, and inclusivity.* Once the Federal advisory committee is formed, committee chairs and DFOs should foster a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion by encouraging engagement, participation, and expression from all committee members and any members with dissenting opinions, as applicable.
( d ) *Seek feedback.* Agencies should continually seek feedback from advisory committee members and the public regarding the advisory committee's activities. At regular intervals, agencies should communicate to the members how their advice has affected agency programs and decision making and make this information available to the public.
§ 959.10 Default. ( a ) If the respondent fails to file an answer within the time specified in the notice of hearing, the respondent shall be deemed in default and to have waived hearing and further procedural steps. The Judicial Officer shall thereafter issue an order without further notice to the respondent.
( b ) If the respondent files an answer but fails to appear at the hearing, the presiding officer shall receive petitioner's evidence and render an initial decision.
[39 FR 33213, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended at 63 FR 66052, Dec. 1, 1998]
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

WILLIAM O. WAGONER, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 

Respondent. 

__________________________ 

2013-3006 

__________________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in case no. CH0831110115-B-1. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION 

__________________________ 

O R D E R 

William O. Wagoner moves for relief in the form of 

vacating the decision of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board (“Board”) that is the subject of this appeal. The 

Office of Personnel Management opposes. 

Wagoner also moves out of time for an extension to 

file his reply brief. 

Case: 13-3006 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 02/01/2013
WILLIAM WAGONER v. OPM 2

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion to vacate is denied without prejudice. 

(2) Wagoner’s motion for an extension of time is 

granted. The reply brief filed on January 2, 2013, is 

accepted for filing. 

(3) All other pending motions are denied as moot. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

s25 

Case: 13-3006 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 02/01/2013
EXHIBIT 10.36.1



                                       April 23, 2001



Peter L. Lynch
Albertson's, Inc.
250 E. Parkcenter Blvd.
Boise, ID   83706

Dear Peter:

     This letter sets forth our agreement and  understanding  of an amendment to
the letter  agreement  entered  into  between  you and  Albertson's,  Inc,  (the
"Company") on January 26, 2001 (the "Agreement").

     Paragraph 1(a) of the Agreement is amended by adding the following sentence
to the end of such paragraph:

     Upon your Termination Date, you will become vested in 100% of your award of
100,000 deferred stock units granted to you on April 23, 2001.

     All of the terms of the Agreement, as modified herein, shall remain in full
force and effect.

     This   amendment  to  the   Agreement  may  be  executed  in  one  or  more
counterparts,  or duplicates of originals,  all of which, taken together,  shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

     If  this  statement  of  the  Company's   understanding  conforms  to  your
understanding, please execute and return the enclosed copy of this letter to me.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       ALBERTSON'S, INC.


                                       /s/  Michael F. Reuling
                                       Michael F. Reuling
                                       Vice Chairman of the Company


<PAGE>

Peter L. Lynch
April 23, 2001
Page 2




     By signing this agreement, I acknowledge that I have read this amendment to
the Agreement and  understand  its terms and that I entered into this  agreement
freely, voluntarily, and without coercion.

Agreed and accepted as of the 23rd day of April 2001 in Boise, Idaho.



      /s/  Peter L. Lynch
-----------------------------
           Peter L. Lynch
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT SHIR LEY GR

AC E KESAULYA; e t a l., Pe titione rs, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 10-72416 Age n c y Nos. A097-614-139 A097-614-140 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2014 ** B e fore : C LIFTON, B EA, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. Shirle y Gra c e Ke sa

uly a and he r son, na

tive s a nd c itiz e ns of Indone sia , pe tition for re vie w of the B o ard of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing the i r m otion to re c onside r. Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a

buse of disc re t ion the B IA’ s de n ia l of a m otion to re c onside r. C

ano

# FIL ED MAY22 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Me r ida v . IN S , 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th C i r. 2002). W e dism i ss in pa rt a nd de ny in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w. W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w pe titione rs’ c onte ntions re late d to a sy lum , e quita ble tolling of the

one -y e ar filing re quire m e nt, a nd re ope ning to subm

it a dditiona l e vide nc e be c a

use pe t itione rs fa ile d to ra ise the se issue s to the B IA. Se e Barron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th C ir. 2004). Furthe r, we de c line to c onside r the 2010 re ligious fre e dom re port pe titione rs re fe re nc e in the ir ope ning brie f be c a use our re vie w is limite d to the a dm inistra tive re c ord unde rly ing the a ge nc y ’ s de c ision. Se e Fishe r v . IN S, 79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th C ir. 1996) (e n ba nc ). The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing pe titione rs’ m otion to re c o nside r the i r withholding of rem ova l c la im in light of this c ourt’ s disfa vore d group c a se s be c a

use pe titione rs did not de m onstra te suffic ie n t individualiz e d risk to show it is m

ore like ly tha n not the y would bepe rse c ute d in Indone sia . Se e Halim v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 971, 979 (9th C ir. 2009); W ak k ary v . Holde r , 558 F.3d 1049, 1066 (9th C ir. 2009) (“ [a ] n a pplic ant for withholding of re m ova l will ne e d

to a dduc e a c onside ra

bly la rge r qua ntum of individualiz e d-risk e vide nc e to pre va il tha n would a n a sy lum a pplic ant” ). Fina lly , we re je c t pe t itione rs’ patte rn and pra c tic e argum e nt. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.
1 0 - 7 2 4 1 6 2
V

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5202

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade and fisheries for the vessel ANNANDALE.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 2000

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries

for the vessel ANNANDALE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

5 June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106

6 and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the
2

•HR 5202 IH

1 coastwise trade and fisheries for the vessel ANNANDALE

2 (formerly the M/V HENRY OPUKAHAIA; United States

3 official number 519434).

Æ