alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-81883-RAR

BRITTANY ROBERSON, et al.,

individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________________/

REFERRAL TO SECOND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

THIS CAUSE came before the Court for a status conference on June 28, 2024, [ECF No. 226]. 

As discussed with the parties, this case is hereby REFERRED for purposes of a settlement conference 

before Magistrate Judge William Matthewman. Except as provided under Local Rule 16.2.E, the 

appearance of counsel and each party, or representatives of each party with full authority to enter into a 

full and complete settlement, is mandatory.

1 

All discussions, representations, and statements made at the settlement conference shall be 

confidential and privileged. If the case is settled at the settlement conference, counsel shall promptly 

notify the Court by filing a notice of settlement signed by counsel of record within three (3) days of the 

conference. 

Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate 

sanctions, including but not limited to the dismissal of this action or entry of default.

1 Although the Court has no objection to the named Plaintiffs appearing via videoconference, the Court 

wholly defers to Magistrate Judge Matthewman’s policies and procedures. 

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 227 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2024 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 28th day of June, 2024.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:22-cv-81883-RAR Document 227 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2024 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-36.410 How do we dispose of a gift in the form of money or intangible personal property?

Report intangible personal property to GSA, Personal Property Management Division (FBP), Washington, DC 20406. You must not transfer or dispose of this property without prior approval of GSA. The Secretary of the Treasury will dispose of money and negotiable instruments such as bonds, notes, or other securities under the authority of 31 U.S.C. 324.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6824

CHARLTON A. HORTON, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. RALPH TERRY, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv - 00103

- GMG )

Submitted : September 22, 2020 Decided: September 25, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Charlton A. Horton, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charlton A. Horton, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Horton ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When t he district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 7 4 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Horton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of app ealability and dismiss the appeal. As the district court granted Horton’s motion for leave to file out of time, we deny as moot the motion for leave to file out of time that is currently pending in this court. We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
§ 4.1 Chairman. ( a ) The Chairman of the Board of Governors is elected by the Governors from among the members of the Board. The Chairman: ( 1 ) Shall be elected at the Board's regularly scheduled annual meeting for a term that commences on December 1 of the calendar year in which the election occurred, or upon the death, departure or resignation of the current Chairman, whichever occurs first, and expires upon the election and installation of a successor Chairman;
( 2 ) Shall preside at all regular and special meetings of the Board, and shall set the agenda for such meetings;
( 3 ) Shall select and appoint the chairman, vice chairman (if any), and members of any committee properly established by the Board.
( b ) If the Postmaster General is elected Chairman of the Board, the Governors shall also elect one of their number to preside during proceedings dealing with matters upon which only the Governors may vote.
( c ) In the event of the Chairman's death, departure or resignation prior to the election of a successor, the Board, as soon as practicable, shall elect a new Chairman who shall serve a term that commences immediately upon election and expires upon the election and installation of a successor Chairman.
[77 FR 17333, Mar. 26, 2012, as amended at 86 FR 10013, Feb. 18, 2021]
#### § 80.1360 Nehalem River, OR.

A line drawn approximately parallel with the general trend of the highwater shoreline across the Nehalem River Entrance.
<Page>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY




       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Donald E. Steen, Mark A. Kopser and John J. Wellik and each of
them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his
behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of United
Surgical Partners International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite
and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents
and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.







                                            /s/ D. Scott Mackesy
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            D. Scott Mackesy
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

 

ROBERT EUGENE REAMES, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D14-1305 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed July 24, 2015. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte 

County; Paul Alessandroni, Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

 After finding that he willfully violated probation, the trial court revoked 

Robert Eugene Reames' probation and sentenced him to six years in prison for 

trafficking in stolen property in case 11-CF-1684 and to a concurrent term of five years 
- 2 - 

in prison for burglary of a structure in case 12-CF-174. We affirm. However, despite 

the trial court granting Reames' motion to correct scrivener's errors, Reames' corrected 

orders of probation still contain the errors. Specifically, both orders reflect that he 

admitted to the violations of probation when he actually contested the violations. Also, 

the order of revocation in case 12-CF-174 erroneously reflects that the trial court found 

him to have violated conditions one and sixteen of his probation, when the trial court 

orally found him to have violated only condition one in that case. Accordingly, we 

remand for entry of corrected written orders of revocation of probation in cases 11-CF1684 and 12-CF-174. See Moore v. State, 100 So. 3d 81 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Reames 

need not be present when the corrections are made. 

 Affirmed and remanded for correction of the written orders of revocation of 

probation. 

LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
§ 102-34.230 How am I responsible for protecting Government motor vehicles? When a Government motor vehicle is under your control, you must: ( a ) Park or store the Government motor vehicle in a manner that reasonably protects it from theft or damage; and
( b ) Lock the unattended Government motor vehicle. (The only exception to this requirement is when fire regulations or other directives prohibit locking motor vehicles in closed buildings or enclosures.)
Exhibit 21
                                        
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF DUKE REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                         
                                  State of         Names Under Which
                                  Incorporation    Subsidiary Does
Subsidiary                        Or Organization  Business
----------                        ---------------  -----------------
<S>                               <C>              <C>
Duke Services, Inc.               Indiana          Duke Services, Inc.
     
Duke Realty Services Limited      Indiana          Duke Realty Services Limited
Partnership                                        Partnership
     
Duke Realty Construction, Inc.    Indiana          Duke Realty Construction,
                                                   Inc.
     
Duke Construction Limited         Indiana          Duke Construction Limited
Partnership                                        Partnership
     
B/D Limited Partnership           Indiana          B/D Limited Partnership
     
Lamida Partners Limited           Ohio             Lamida Partners Limited 
Partnership                                        Partnership
   
Kenwood Office Associates         Ohio             Kenwood Office Associates
     
Park Creek Venture                Indiana          Park Creek Venture
    
Parkrite Limited Partnership      Indiana          Parkrite Limited Partnership
     
Post Road Limited Partnership     Indiana          Post Road Limited Partnership
     
Shadeland Station Office          Indiana          Shadeland Station Office
Associates II Limited                              Associates II Limited
Partnership                                        Partnership
     
Dugan Realty, L.L.C.              Indiana          Dugan Realty, L.L.C.
     
Duke Tees Joint Venture           Indiana          Duke Tees Joint Venture
     
Park Fletcher Limited             Indiana          Park Fletcher Limited
Partnership 2728                                   Partnership 2728
     
Cincinnati Development Group      Ohio             Cincinnati Development Group
 L.L.C.                                            L.L.C.
     
Dugan Office, L.L.C.              Indiana          Dugan Office, L.L.C.
    
625 Building, L.L.C.              Missouri         625 Building, L.L.C.
     
Minneapolis West Associates       Minnesota        Minneapolis West Associates
     
Duke A&M, L.L.C.                  Ohio             Duke A&M, L.L.C.
     
Campus Development, L.L.C.        Ohio             Campus Development, L.L.C.
     
Duke Neyer, L.L.C.                Ohio             Duke Neyer, L.L.C.
     
Dugan SSP, L.L.C.                 Indiana          Dugan SSL.C.






</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6174

SHAKA MACUMBA ZULU X, a/k/a Michael Wayne

Montgomery,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY C. BATSON; LAURIE F. BESSINGER; J. D.

WESSINGER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-3395-6-3AK)

Submitted: June 20, 199 Decided: June 25, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann,

ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. X v. Batson, No. CA-95-3395-6-3AK (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAHMIR HARRIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 506 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of April, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### § 101-28.202 GSA/DOD cross-servicing agreement.

An agreement between GSA and DOD has established procedures to be followed in the cross-servicing of storage and warehousing services between Government agencies. Copies of the agreement, containing a listing of minimum services to be provided, responsibilities of agencies operating storage facilities, responsibilities of requesting agencies, and agency contact points to determine storage availability, may be obtained from the General Services Administration (FFN), Washington, DC 20406.

[42 FR 2317, Jan. 11, 1977]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-37,637]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on May 1, 2000, in response to a worker petition which was filed by the company on behalf of workers at the Wauna Mill, Fort James Operating Company, Clatskanie, Oregon.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently further investigation in this care would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 25th day of May, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-15145  Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.                                      /s/ Paul J. Evanson  August 8, 2006 Paul J. Evanson   Principal Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

Case No. 0:22-cv-62219-WPD

JAMIL HINDI, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff, 

v.

MODANI FORT LAUDERDALE, LLC,

Defendant. 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO DISMISS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss, filed 

December 30, 2022 [DE 10]. On January 11, 2023, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Class Action 

Complaint [DE 12] and, therefore, Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss [DE 10] is now moot. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s Partial Motion to 

Dismiss [DE 10] is hereby DENIED as moot. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 12th day of January, 2023.

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-62219-WPD Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/12/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 102-34.220 What does GSA do if it learns of unofficial use of a Government motor vehicle?

GSA reports the matter to the head of your agency. The agency investigates and may, if appropriate, take disciplinary action under 31 U.S.C. 1349 or may report the violation to the Attorney General for prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 641.
250 E Street SW

Washington, D.C. 20525

202-606-5000/ 800-942-2677

Submitting Progress Reports Litmos Courses

 

1) Instrument Identification and Application: Education Instruments 

 

Description: This eCourse presents information on sample instruments that may 

help you measure your contributions to the Education Focus Area. In this session, 

you will view: A brief overview of AmeriCorps sample instruments in the 

Education Focus Area, a description of how to ensure a sample instruments fits 

your program’s needs, and a summary of how to administer sample instruments.

Access this course 

 

2) Instruments Approved for School Readiness 

Description: This tutorial will help Foster Grandparent Program and RSVP grantees 

understand the AmeriCorps performance measure requirements for school 

readiness and how projects can contribute to National Performance Measurement 

with the Child Readiness Collection instrument. Review the instrument and how it 

can be used by programs to measure the impact of AmeriCorps Seniors

volunteers.

Access this course 

3) AmeriCorps Seniors Independent Living and Respite Care Surveys 

Description: This tutorial shares information about the approved AmeriCorps 

Seniors instruments available to assist in the measurement of impact in the areas 

of aging in place and respite care for Senior Companion Program and RSVP 

grantees. Review the AmeriCorps Seniors Independent Living and Respite Care 

Performance Measure Survey and how it can be used by programs to contribute 

to national performance measurement.

Access this course 
2

4) Using National Service Measures to Demonstrate Impact: Telling the AmeriCorps 

Senior Story 

Description: This tutorial will assist current AmeriCorps Seniors grantees and staff 

of sponsoring organizations prepare for the implementation of the National 

Performance Measures. AmeriCorps Seniors has long been at the forefront of 

meeting critical needs through service. This tutorial reflects on the evolution of 

impact programming used by AmeriCorps Seniors and introduces how we will 

measure impact going forward, on a national level. We introduce the Focus Areas 

that AmeriCorps Seniors will measure, and general changes to the work plan. This 

tutorial was created by AmeriCorps.

Access this course
Exhibit 10.11

NOTICE OF CONVERSION

 

September 20, 2019 

 

Board of Directors

Cleartronic, Inc.

8000 N Federal Hwy, Suite 100

Boca Raton, FL 33487

        

Gentlemen:

 

The undersigned, Richard J. Martin (“Martin”) hereby irrevocably elects to convert 

$80,595.58 of accrued dividends due on Cleartronic, Inc. Series A Convertible Preferred Stock owned by Martin into 1,611,912 shares of Cleartronic, Inc. common stock.

 

The shares are to be issued in the record name of the undersigned and the undersigned agrees to pay all transfer and other taxes and charges applicable thereto. 

 

Date of Conversion:  September 20, 2019

 

Applicable Conversion Price: $0.05 

 

Shares are to be registered in the following name:

 

Richard J. Martin

10306 Barberville Rd.

Fort Mill, SC 29707




/s/ Richard J. Martin

Richard J. Martin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,180
<SECURITIES>                                     8,132
<RECEIVABLES>                                  313,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    270,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               641,707
<PP&E>                                         629,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                (98,026)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,173,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          493,449
<BONDS>                                      1,240,016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          134,436
<PREFERRED>                                        427
<COMMON>                                         2,171
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,173,465
<SALES>                                      1,043,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,043,109
<CGS>                                          858,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  858,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,355
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,684
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,684
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>
#### §§ 3020.106-3020.109 [Reserved]