alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 329.9 Time at which commerce exists or determination is made. ( a ) *Past use.* A waterbody which was navigable in its natural or improved state, or which was susceptible of reasonable improvement (as discussed in § 329.8(b) of this part) retains its character as “navigable in law” even though it is not presently used for commerce, or is presently incapable of such use because of changed conditions or the presence of obstructions. Nor does absence of use because of changed economic conditions affect the legal character of the waterbody. Once having attained the character of “navigable in law,” the Federal authority remains in existence, and cannot be abandoned by administrative officers or court action. Nor is mere inattention or ambiguous action by Congress an abandonment of Federal control. However, express statutory declarations by Congress that described portions of a waterbody are non-navigable, or have been abandoned, are binding upon the Department of the Army. Each statute must be carefully examined, since Congress often reserves the power to amend the Act, or assigns special duties of supervision and control to the Secretary of the Army or Chief of Engineers.
( b ) *Future or potential use.* Navigability may also be found in a waterbody's susceptibility for use in its ordinary condition or by reasonable improvement to transport interstate commerce. This may be either in its natural or improved condition, and may thus be existent although there has been no actual use to date. Non-use in the past therefore does not prevent recognition of the potential for future use.
**Exhibit 31(b)1**

**ALABAMA POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Charles D. McCrary, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 3, 2006

/s/Charles D. McCrary

Charles D. McCrary

President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 52.2 Authority. ( a ) The Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through boards of civilians, is authorized to correct any military record of the Coast Guard when the Secretary considers it necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice. 10 U.S.C. 1552. The Secretary shall ensure that final action on a complete application for correction is taken within 10 months of its receipt. (14 U.S.C. 2507)
( b ) Corrections made under this authority are final and conclusive on all officers of the Government except when procured by fraud. 10 U.S.C. 1552(a)(4).
[OST Doc. No. 2002-13439, 68 FR 9886, Mar. 3, 2003, as amended by USCG-2003-15404, 68 FR 37740, June 25, 2003; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58277, Sept. 18, 2020]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5265

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt State and local

political committees from the notification and reporting requirements

made applicable to political organizations by Public Law 106–230.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 2000

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt

State and local political committees from the notification

and reporting requirements made applicable to political

organizations by Public Law 106–230.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL

4 COMMITTEES FROM NOTIFICATION AND RE5 PORTING REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY PUB6 LIC LAW 106–230.

7 (a) EXEMPTION FROM NOTIFICATION REQUIRE8 MENTS.—Paragraph (5) of section 527(i) of the Internal
2

•HR 5265 IH

1 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to organizations must no2 tify Secretary that they are section 527 organizations) is

3 amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (A),

4 by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) and

5 inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the end the following

6 new subparagraph:

7 ‘‘(C) which—

8 ‘‘(i) engages in exempt function activ9 ity solely in the attempt to influence the

10 selection, nomination, election, or appoint11 ment of any individual to any State or

12 local public office or office in a State or

13 local political organization, and

14 ‘‘(ii) is subject to State or local con15 tribution and expenditure reporting re16 quirements relating to selections, nomina17 tions, elections, and appointments to such

18 offices, and reports under such require19 ments are publicly available.’’.

20 (b) EXEMPTION FROM REPORTING REQUIRE21 MENTS.—Paragraph (5) of section 527(j) of such Code

22 (relating to required disclosures of expenditures and con23 tributions) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of sub24 paragraph (D), by striking the period at the end of sub-
3

•HR 5265 IH

1 paragraph (E) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at the

2 end the following new subparagraph:

3 ‘‘(F) to any organization which—

4 ‘‘(i) engages in exempt function activ5 ity solely in the attempt to influence the

6 selection, nomination, election, or appoint7 ment of any individual to any State or

8 local public office or office in a State or

9 local political organization, and

10 ‘‘(ii) is subject to State or local con11 tribution and expenditure reporting re12 quirements relating to selections, nomina13 tions, elections, and appointments to such

14 offices, and reports under such require15 ments are publicly available.’’.

16 (c) EXEMPTION FROM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL

17 RETURN BASED ON GROSS RECEIPTS.—Paragraph (6) of

18 section 6012(a) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘sec19 tion)’’ and inserting ‘‘section and an organization de20 scribed in section 527(i)(5)(C)’’.

21 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

22 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend23 ments made by Public Law 106–230.

Æ
#### § 957.10 Conduct of the hearing.

The Hearing Officer may approve or disapprove witnesses in his or her discretion. All testimony will be taken under oath or affirmation, and subject to cross-examination. The Hearing Officer may exclude evidence to avoid unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, undue delay, waste of time, or presentation of irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative evidence. Although the Hearing Officer will consider the Federal Rules of Evidence for guidance regarding admissibility of evidence and other evidentiary issues, he or she is not bound by those rules. The weight to be attached to evidence presented in any particular form will be within the discretion of the Hearing Officer, taking into consideration all the circumstances of the particular case. Stipulations of fact agreed upon by the parties may be accepted as evidence at the hearing. The parties may stipulate the testimony that would be given by a witness if the witness were present. The Hearing Officer may in any case require evidence in addition to that offered by the parties. A party requiring the use of a foreign language interpreter allowing testimony to be taken in English for itself or witnesses it proffers is responsible for making all necessary arrangements and paying all costs and expenses associated with the use of an interpreter.
Exhibit 10.29

FIVE YEAR AGREEMENT  BETWEEN            (Grower)        and        AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY  (Company)





---



THE
PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH NO. 4 TO PARAGRAPH NO. 14, BOTH INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, ARE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE UNDERSIGNED REPRESENTS THAT HE/SHE IS AN AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OF GROWER AND THAT HE/SHE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO BIND GROWER TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Dated
this      day of            ,      .

|AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY |     | GROWER
|------------------------------ | --- | ------
|By                             |     | By    
|                               | Its |       

---







2

---



3

---



4

---

QuickLinks
Senior Special Agent Darren Flinn

US Fish and Wildlife Service – Digital Evidence Recovery and Technical Support Unit 

Senior Special Agent (SSA) Darren Flinn has been an agent of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Criminal 

Office of Law Enforcement since November 2022. SSA Flinn has over 15 years of experience conducting 

criminal investigations, with the last 5 spent in digital forensics. 

From August 2007 until October 2017, SSA Flinn was Criminal Investigator for the US Secret Service, and 

a member of the South Carolina Electronic Crimes Task Force from 2007-2014. From October 2017 until 

November 2022, SSA Flinn was a Criminal Investigator for the US Environmental Protection Agency – 

Criminal Investigative Division, and in November 2022 transferred to his current position at US FWS – 

DERTSU. SSA Flinn has experience investigating a wide variety of criminal violations, to include 

counterfeit, fraud, identity theft, cyber crime, internet crimes against children, and international trafficking. 

Prior to joining the US Secret Service, SSA Flinn spent 10 years as a Paramedic and Technical Rescue 

Technician. 

Education

 College of Charleston 

Bachelor of Arts - Biology May 2001 

Specialized Training/Certifications

 Cellebrite Certified Mobile Examiner 

Orlando, FL January 2023 

 International Association of Computer Investigative Specialists - Cyber Incident Forensic 

Response 

Orlando, FL May 2022 

 International Association of Computer Investigative Specialists - Certified Forensic 

Computer Examiner 

Orlando, FL October 2021 

 Nuix Forensic Practitioner 

Jacksonville, FL September 2020 

 Sumuri Recon 

Jacksonville, FL December 2019 

 Resolution Video - Digital Video Evidence Recovery 

Fredericksburg, VA August 2019 

 Digital Evidence Acquisition Specialist Training 

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center - Glynco, GA May 2019 

 NW3C - Basic Digital Forensic Analysis 

New Castle, DE April 2019 

 X1 Social Discovery - Certified Social Examiner 

Melbourne, FL August 2018 

 NW3C - Social Media and Open Source Intelligence 

Wyandotte, OK July 2018 

 US Secret Service Special Agent Training Course 

James J. Rowley Training Center - Beltsville, MD February 2008 

 Criminal Investigator Training Program 

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center - Glynco, GA September 2007 

Case 1:22-cr-20340-KMW Document 105-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2023 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated November 7, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 450 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-233547) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”.








/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 7, 2019
Order entered November 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00234-CR

JOHN HENRY WILSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-55608-S

ORDER

On September 19, 2013, this Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a cost bill and accompanying documents. When the 

supplemental record was not filed by October, 14, 2013, this Court again ordered the Dallas 

County District Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a cost bill and 

accompanying documents. To date, the Dallas County District Clerk still has not filed the 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the cost bill and accompanying documents.

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, to 

file by NOVEMBER 21, 2013 a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of 

the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court 

appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, 
the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to 

receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a 

document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court 

appointed attorney fee.

If the Court does not receive the supplemental clerk’s record by the date specified, the 

Court will utilize the available remedies to obtain the supplemental clerk’s record, including 

ordering that Gary Fitzsimmons show cause why he should not be held in contempt for not 

complying with this Court’s order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
/**
 * @file
 * JavaScript behaviors for time integration.
 */

(function ($, Drupal, once) {

  'use strict';

  // @see https://github.com/jonthornton/jquery-timepicker#options
  Drupal.webform = Drupal.webform || {};
  Drupal.webform.timePicker = Drupal.webform.timePicker || {};
  Drupal.webform.timePicker.options = Drupal.webform.timePicker.options || {};

  /**
   * Attach timepicker fallback on time elements.
   *
   * @type {Drupal~behavior}
   *
   * @prop {Drupal~behaviorAttach} attach
   *   Attaches the behavior to time elements.
   */
  Drupal.behaviors.webformTime = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {
      if (!$.fn.timepicker) {
        return;
      }

      $(once('webformTimePicker', 'input[data-webform-time-format]', context)).each(function () {
        var $input = $(this);

        // Skip if time inputs are supported by the browser and input is not a text field.
        // @see \Drupal\webform\Element\WebformDatetime
        if (window.Modernizr && Modernizr.inputtypes && Modernizr.inputtypes.time === true && $input.attr('type') !== 'text') {
          return;
        }

        var options = {};
        options.timeFormat = $input.data('webformTimeFormat');
        if ($input.attr('min')) {
          options.minTime = $input.attr('min');
        }
        if ($input.attr('max')) {
          options.maxTime = $input.attr('max');
        }

        // HTML5 time element steps is in seconds but for the timepicker
        // fallback it needs to be in minutes.
        // Note: The 'datetime' element uses the #date_increment which defaults
        // to 1 (second).
        // @see \Drupal\Core\Datetime\Element\Datetime::processDatetime
        // Only use step if it is greater than 60 seconds.
        if ($input.attr('step') && ($input.attr('step') > 60)) {
          options.step = Math.round($input.attr('step') / 60);
        }
        else {
          options.step = 1;
        }

        // Set step to 'any' to prevent clientside validation issues.
        // @see \Drupal\clientside_validation\Plugin\CvValidator\Step
        // @see https://www.drupal.org/project/clientside_validation/issues/2941434
        $input.attr('step', 'any');

        options = $.extend(options, Drupal.webform.timePicker.options);

        $input.timepicker(options);
      });
    }
  };

})(jQuery, Drupal, once);
#### § 80.165 New York Harbor.

A line drawn from 40°34′56.600′′ N., 073°45′17.200′′ W. (East Rockaway Inlet Breakwater Light) to 40°27′42.177′′ N., 074°00′07.309′′ W. (Sandy Hook Light).

[USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44280, July 27, 2015]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81588-CIV-CANNON

In the matter of,

CHRISTOPHER MCDERMOTT

AS OWNER OF MOTOR VESSEL FRICKA 

BEARING HIN # US-SERV2147H899 FOR 

EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF 

LIABILITY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALL CLAIMANTS

All Claimants against McDermott or 

M/V Fricka Arising Out of the April 16, 

2022 Voyage in the Vicinity of Palm Beach Inlet

Defendants.

____________________________________/

CHRISTOPHER MCDERMOTT

AS OWNER OF MOTOR VESSEL FRICKA 

BEARING HIN # US-SERV2147H899 FOR 

EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF 

LIABILITY,

Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

M/Y COUNTRY BOY

its engines, tackle, equipment, electronics, rigging, 

dinghies, furniture, appurtenances, etc., in rem

and CHRISTOPHER FOX, in personam,

Third-Party Defendants.

____________________________________/

Case 9:22-cv-81588-DMM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 2
 CASE NO. 22-81588-CIV-CANNON

2

ORDER DISMISSING THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Third-Party Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal as to Third-Party Complaint Only [ECF No. 20], filed on November 2, 2022. Pursuant 

to Third-Party Plaintiff’s Notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Third-Party Plaintiff’s Complaint against M/Y COUNTRY BOY, in rem, and Captain 

Christopher Fox, in personam [ECF No. 6] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, 

effective November 2, 2022, the date on which the Third-Party Plaintiff filed the Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal [ECF No. 20].

2. The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE M/Y COUNTRY BOY and Christopher Fox as 

Defendants in this matter.

3. This action remains OPEN as to Petitioner Christopher McDermott’s Petition for 

Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability [ECF No. 1].

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Fort Pierce, Florida, on November 2, 2022.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81588-DMM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 3030.160 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart allocates rate authority to address the effects of decreases in the density of mail as measured by the sources identified in § 3030.161. The calculation of the additional rate authority corresponding to the change in density is described in § 3030.162.
( b ) The Postal Service shall file a notice with the Commission by December 31 of each year that calculates the amount of density rate authority that is eligible to be authorized under this subpart.
( c ) The Commission shall review the Postal Service's notice and determine how much, if any, rate authority will be authorized under this subpart. Any rate authority allocated under this subpart: ( 1 ) Shall be made available to the Postal Service as of the date of the Commission's determination;
( 2 ) Must be included in the calculation of the maximum rate adjustment authority in the first generally applicable rate adjustment filed after the Commission's determination; and
( 3 ) May be used to generate unused rate authority, if unused, within 12 months of the Commission's announcement.
Exhibit 99 (a)

Household Home Equity Loan Trust 1999-1
---------------------------------------


Original Principal Class A                        431,920,000.00
   Class A-1                                      237,000,000.00
   Class A-2                                       62,000,000.00
   Class A-3                                       90,000,000.00
   Class A-4                                       42,920,000.00
Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                       431,920.00
   Class A-1                                          237,000.00
   Class A-2                                           62,000.00
   Class A-3                                           90,000.00
   Class A-4                                           42,920.00
Original Principal Class M                         68,470,000.00
   Class M-1                                       35,550,000.00
   Class M-2                                       32,920,000.00
Number of Class M Bond (000's)                         68,470.00
   Class M-1                                           35,550.00
   Class M-2                                           32,920.00

Distribution Date                                Sum of 01/20/2002 to 12/20/2002

                                                             Total 2002
CLASS A
Principal Distribution                                                     0.00
Class A-1 Interest Distribution                                            0.00

Principal Distribution                                            51,646,064.75
Class A-2 Interest Distribution                                    1,131,328.35

Principal Distribution                                            12,301,972.86
Class A-3 Interest Distribution                                    6,378,559.99

Principal Distribution                                               550,925.50
Class A-4 Interest Distribution                                    3,094,532.04


Total Distribution Amount - Class A                               75,103,383.49


CLASS M
Principal Distribution                                            11,325,935.63
Interest Distribution                                              2,400,351.96

Principal Distribution                                             6,589,495.25
Interest Distribution                                              2,744,172.60

Total Distribution Amount                                         23,059,955.44