alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 960.11 Documentation of fees and expenses. ( a ) The application shall be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses, including the cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project or similar matter, for which an award is sought. A separate itemized statement shall be submitted for each professional firm or individual whose services are covered by the application, showing the hours spent in connection with the proceeding by each individual, a description of the specific services performed, the rate at which each fee has been computed, any expenses for which reimbursement is sought, the total amount claimed, and the total amount paid or payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided. The adjudicative officer may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any expenses claimed. In addition, the Board of Contract Appeals may require an applicant to submit to an audit by the Postal Service of its claimed fees and expenses.
( b ) Where the case has been sustained in part and denied in part or where the applicant has prevailed in only a significant and discrete substantive portion of the case, the application must be limited to fees and expenses allocable to the portion of the case as to which the applicant was the prevailing party.
[46 FR 45945, Sept. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 6798, Mar. 5, 1987]
§ 401.57 Disembarking or boarding. ( a ) Except as authorized by an officer, no person, other than a member of the crew of a vessel passing through, shall disembark or board any vessel while the vessel is passing through.
( b ) No member of the crew of a vessel passing through shall disembark or board except for the purpose of carrying out essential duties as directed by the Master.
( c ) Persons disembarking or boarding shall be assisted by a member of the vessel's crew under safe conditions.
( d ) Persons intending on disembarking or boarding a vessel shall only do so after they have confirmed with the Captain that the vessel is fully secured in the lock with Hands-Free Mooring or with mooring lines.
[39 FR 10900, Mar. 22, 1974, as amended at 70 FR 12972, Mar. 17, 2005; 76 FR 13089, Mar. 10, 2011; 89 FR 15961, Mar. 6, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                         9,131
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              30,432
<PP&E>                                         7,984
<DEPRECIATION>                                (5,189)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                33,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,773,597
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       1,189
<OTHER-SE>                                (2,741,559)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  33,227
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  15
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              22,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (22,578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (22,578)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (22,578)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.02)


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-75,987-04

EX PARTE REVAT RENE VARA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1061075-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while

intoxicated and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed

his conviction. Vara v. State, No. 01-07-00291-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 18, 2008)

(not designated for publication). 

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. The trial court made

findings of fact, concluded that trial counsel was ineffective, and recommended that we grant relief. 
2

Relief is granted. The judgment in cause number 1061075 in the 208th District Court of

Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County

to answer the charges in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant

within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to theTexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: 1/13/16

Do not publish
1

BRITO, PLLC

2121 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Suite 650│ Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 614-4071

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Fort Lauderdale Division

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.

Defendant.

Case No.: 22-cv-61842-AHS

PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT

Plaintiff Donald J. Trump (“Plaintiff”), by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant 

to the Court’s July 14, 2023 Paperless Order on Jurisdiction [DE 29], Plaintiff submits its 

Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement, as follows:

1. Plaintiff DONALD J. TRUMP is a citizen of, a resident of, and is domiciled (with 

an intent to remain) in, the State of Florida.

2. Defendant CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. is a corporation organized and 

incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware with its principal place of business located at 

One CNN Center, Atlanta, Georgia, 30303.

3. This Court possesses jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(c)(1) 

on the grounds of diversity.

Case 0:22-cv-61842-AHS Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

BRITO, PLLC

2121 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Suite 650│ Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 614-4071

Dated July 21, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

BRITO, PLLC

Counsel for Plaintiff 

2121 Ponce de Leon Boulevard

Suite 650

Miami, FL 33134

Office: 305-614-4071

Fax: 305-440-4385

By: /s/ Alejandro Brito

ALEJANDRO BRITO

Florida Bar No. 098442 

abrito@britopllc.com

apiriou@britopllc.com

LINDSEY HALLIGAN, P.A.

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

511 SE 5th Avenue

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Office: 720-435-2870

By: /s/ Lindsey Halligan

LINDSEY HALLIGAN

Florida Bar No.109481

lindseyhalligan@outlook.com

Case 0:22-cv-61842-AHS Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 2 of 3
3

BRITO, PLLC

2121 Ponce De Leon Boulevard, Suite 650│ Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 614-4071

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 21, 2023 the foregoing was served via the Court’s

CM/ECF System upon:

BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP

Eric P. Schroeder, Esq. 

Brian M. Underwood, Jr. Esq. 

1201 W. Peachtree St. NW

Atlanta, GA 30309

eric.schroeder@bclplaw.com

brian.underwood@bclplaw.com

GUNSTER, YOAKLEY & STEWART, P.A. 

George S. LeMieux, Esq. 

Eric C. Edison, Esq. 

450 East Las Olas Boulevard

Suite 1400 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 

glemieux@gunster.com 

eedison@gunster.com

mzayas@gunster.com

dpeterson@gunster.com

eservice@gunster.com

Counsel for Defendant

By: /s/ Alejandro Brito

Case 0:22-cv-61842-AHS Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2023 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, DavidA. Berg, Chief Executive Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 15th day of July,2008.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ DAVID A. BERG                             |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: David A. Berg                           |   |
|   | Title: President and Chief Executive  Officer |   |
|        |                                               |        |  |

 

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 101-30.101-3 National stock number. The *national stock number* (NSN) is the identifying number assigned to each item of supply. The NSN consists of the 4-digit Federal Supply Classification (FSC) code and the 9-digit national item identification number (NIIN). The written, printed, or typed NSN configuration is 1234-00-567-8901. The following terms are elements of the 13-digit national stock number: ( a ) *Federal Supply Classification* (FSC) is a 4-digit number which groups similar items into classes.
( b ) *National Codification Bureau* (NCB) code is a 2-digit number designating the central cataloging office of the NATO or other friendly country which assigned the national item identification number (NIIN) and is used as the first two digits of the NIIN.
( c ) *National item identification number* (NIIN) is a 9-digit number composed of the NCB code number (2-digits) followed by 7 other nonsignificant digits.
[41 FR 11308, Mar. 18, 1976]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5575

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the two-year

waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits following the divorce.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 2000

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate

the two-year waiting period for divorced spouse’s benefits

following the divorce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TWO-YEAR WAITING PERIOD

4 FOR DIVORCED SPOUSE’S BENEFITS FOL5 LOWING THE DIVORCE IN CASES OF PRIOR

6 RECEIPT OF SPOUSE’S BENEFITS.

7 (a) WIFE’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section

8 202(b)(5)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

9 402(b)(5)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘divorced wife—’’

10 and all that follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and insert-
2

•HR 5575 IH

1 ing ‘‘divorced wife meets the requirements of subpara2 graphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be enti3 tled’’.

4 (b) HUSBAND’S INSURANCE BENEFITS.—Section

5 202(c)(5)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(c)(5)(A)) is

6 amended by striking ‘‘divorced husband—’’ and all that

7 follows through ‘‘shall be entitled’’ and inserting ‘‘divorced

8 husband meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A)

9 through (D) of paragraph (1), shall be entitled’’.

10 (c) EXEMPTION FROM DEDUCTIONS ON ACCOUNT OF

11 WORK.—Section 203(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

12 403(b)(2)) is amended—

13 (1) by striking ‘‘(2)(A) Except as’’ and all that

14 follows through ‘‘the benefit to which’’ and inserting

15 the following: ‘‘(2) In any case in which any of the

16 other persons referred to in paragraph (1)(B) is en17 titled to monthly benefits as a divorced spouse under

18 subsection (b) or (c) of section 202 for any month,

19 the benefit to which’’; and

20 (2) by striking subparagraph (B).

21 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

22 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with

23 respect to benefits for months after the date of the enact24 ment of this Act.

Æ
# Europos Sąjungos C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 427I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 62 metai2019m. gruodžio 19d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 427I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

62 metai2019m. gruodžio 19d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Nuomonės |
| | ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS |
| | Europos Komisija |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Kvietimas teikti paraiškas Jano Amoso Komenskio apdovanojimui už kokybišką mokymą apie Europos Sąjungą gauti | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

V   Nuomonės

ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS

Europos Komisija

2019/C 427 I/01

Kvietimas teikti paraiškas Jano Amoso Komenskio apdovanojimui už kokybišką mokymą apie Europos Sąjungą gauti

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

V Nuomonės

ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS

Europos Komisija

| 19.12.2019 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 427/1

---

Kvietimas teikti paraiškas

Jano Amoso Komenskio apdovanojimui už kokybišką mokymą apie Europos Sąjungą gauti

(2019/C 427 I/01)

Europos Komisijos Švietimo, jaunimo, sporto ir kultūros generalinis direktoratas paskelbė kvietimą teikti paraiškas Europos Sąjungos Jano Amoso Komenskio apdovanojimui už kokybišką mokymą apie Europos Sąjungą gauti.

Juo bus apdovanojamos mokyklos, kuriose mokiniams padedama patraukliais būdais semtis žinių apie Europos Sąjungą. Apdovanojimu siekiama, kad visose valstybėse narėse būtų įvertintas šios srities darbas ir apie jį būtų žinoma visoje ES. Juo taip pat pabrėžiama ankstyvo mokymo ir mokymosi apie ES svarba. Taip bus atkreipiamas dėmesys į novatoriškus mokymo metodus, kuriuos taikant mokiniai noriai mokosi apie ES, ir padedama juos viešinti.

Paraiškas gali teikti Europos Sąjungoje įsisteigusios ir veikiančios ISCED 2 ir ISCED 3 lygmenų vidurinės mokyklos (ne pavieniai mokytojai).

Pagal šį kvietimą teikti paraiškas bus įteikti dvidešimt aštuoni (28) apdovanojimai po 8 000 EUR – po vieną kiekvienoje ES valstybėje narėje.

Jeigu Jungtinė Karalystė išstotų iš ES iki Europos Komisijai priimant sprendimą dėl apdovanojimų (toks sprendimas priimamas netrukus po paraiškų įvertinimo) ir nebūtų sudarytas susitarimas, kuriuo būtų užtikrinama, kad JK pareiškėjai toliau atitiktų reikalavimus, JK mokyklos apdovanojimo gauti negalės. Tokiu atveju bus įteikti 27, o ne 28 apdovanojimai, tačiau apdovanojimo dydis liks toks pat –8 000 EUR.

Paraiškų pateikimo terminas – 2020 m. vasario 6 d., ketvirtadienis, 17.00 val. vidurio Europos laiku.

Visą susijusią informaciją ir paraiškos formas rasite adresu

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_en

---
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 542

To reduce the number of Trident ballistic missile submarines subject to

a statutory limitation on retirement or dismantlement of strategic nuclear

delivery systems and to provide that any funds saved by retiring such

submarines should be used for national missile defense programs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. FOLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Armed Services

A BILL

To reduce the number of Trident ballistic missile submarines

subject to a statutory limitation on retirement or dismantlement of strategic nuclear delivery systems and

to provide that any funds saved by retiring such submarines should be used for national missile defense programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 542 IH

1 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF TRIDENT BAL2 LISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINES SUBJECT TO A

3 STATUTORY LIMITATION ON RETIREMENT OR

4 DISMANTLEMENT OF STRATEGIC NUCLEAR

5 DELIVERY SYSTEMS.

6 Section 1302(a)(2) of the National Defense Author7 ization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111

8 Stat. 1948) is amended by striking ‘‘18’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘14’’.

10 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON USE OF AMOUNTS SAVED

11 BY REASON OF RETIREMENT OF FOUR TRI12 DENT BALLISTIC MISSILE SUBMARINES.

13 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con14 gress that, if the Secretary of the Navy should reduce the

15 number of operational Trident ballistic missile submarines

16 from the current 18 to 14, then the amount otherwise pro17 grammed for national missile defense programs for any

18 fiscal year after such reduction should be increased by the

19 amount saved during that fiscal year by reason of such

20 reduction.

21 (b) AMOUNTS TO BE INCLUDED AS SAVINGS.—In de22 termining the amount saved by reason of a reduction in

23 operational Trident submarines described in subsection

24 (a), there shall be included amounts saved due to the sub25 marines taken out of service not being backfitted to carry

26 D–5 missiles or refueled and otherwise modernized and
3

•HR 542 IH

1 amounts saved by reason of D–5 missiles for those sub2 marines not being procured.

Æ
#### J. S. Minor v. Gordon. Same v. Mose Minor. Same v. Reynolds.

(Decided October 27, 1916.)

Appeals from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas No. 1).

1. Trial — Instructions—Cause of Action Not Pleaded. — An instruction on a cause of action not pleaded is properly refused.

*7912. Trial — Instructions—Pleading—Evidence.—The jury should he instructed on a cause of action properly pleaded and supported hy some evidence. (For original opinion see 170 Ky. 609).

CLEM W. HUGGINS and J. P. HOBSON & SON for appellant.

JOSEPH S. LAWTON and W. S. SANFORD for appellees.

Response by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Extending and modifying opinion and overruling petition for rehearing.

In plaintiff’s petition for rehearing and extension of opinion our attention has been called to the fact that the question of insurance was not considered in our former opinion. It appears that plaintiffs, by amended petition, alleged that the defendant had insured the distillery plant and had collected the insurance. There was slight evidence tending to sustain this charge. On the trial plaintiffs asked two instructions, one authorizing a recovery of their pro rata part of the insurance if the plant was insured by defendant, and the other authorizing a recovery if defendant failed to- take out insurance. The last instruction was asked on the theory that defendant, in investing the money in the distillery plant prior to the organization of the proposed corporation, was, in effect, a trustee for the stockholders and was, therefore, liable to them if he failed to take out insurance. In response to the contention that such an instruction should have been given, it is sufficient to say that no such cause of action was pleaded. However, as the claim that defendant had taken out insurance on the property was pleaded and there was some evidence tending to support this claim, the trial court should have given an instruction on this question.

Wherefore, the opinion is extended and modified, as herein indicated; otherwise the petition for rehearing is overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5351 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5351

     To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize military 
 recreational facilities to be used by any veteran with a compensable 
                     service-connected disability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2000

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize military 
 recreational facilities to be used by any veteran with a compensable 
                     service-connected disability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF MILITARY RECREATIONAL FACILITIES BY VETERANS WITH 
              COMPENSABLE SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITIES.

    (a) In General.--(1) Chapter 54 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1066. Morale, welfare, and recreation facilities: use by 
              veterans with compensable service-connected disabilities
    ``(a) Disabled Veterans.--A person who is a veteran with a 
compensable service-connected disability (as determined by the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs) shall be permitted to use MWR recreation 
facilities on the same basis as members entitled to retired pay.
    ``(b) Dependents.--Dependents of a person who is permitted under 
subsection (a) to use MWR recreation facilities shall be permitted to 
use such facilities on the same basis as dependents of members entitled 
to retired pay.
    ``(c) MWR Recreation Facilities Defined.--In this section, the term 
`MWR recreation facilities' means recreation facilities operated by 
nonappropriated fund activities of the Department of Defense for the 
morale, welfare, and recreation of members of the armed forces. Such 
term does not incude exchange stores and other revenue-generating 
facilities operated by those activities.''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``1066. Morale, welfare, and recreation retail facilities: use by 
                            veterans with compensable service-connected 
                            disabilities.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 1066 of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall effect at the end of the 180-day 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```