alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 31.1

                       Section 302 Certification

I, Steven Markowitz, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allen Organ
  Company;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
  the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
  cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
  this report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have:
   a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
      the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
   b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our
      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
      and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
      such evaluation; and
   c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the
      registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
  reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
  registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):
   a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
      which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
      ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
      information; and
   b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting.

/s/STEVEN MARKOWITZ
Steven Markowitz
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003
§ 80.155 Watch Hill, RI to Montauk Point, NY. ( a ) A line drawn from 41°18′13.999′′ N., 071°51′30.300′′ W. (Watch Hill Light) to East Point on Fishers Island.
( b ) A line drawn from Race Point to 41°14′36.509′′ N., 072°02′49.676′′ W. (Race Rock Light); thence to 41°12′22.900′′ N., 072°06′24.700′′ W. (Little Gull Island Light) thence to East Point on Plum Island.
( c ) A line drawn from 41°10′16.704′′ N., 072°12′21.684′′ W. (Plum Island Harbor East Dolphin Light) to 41°10′17.262′′ N., 072°12′23.796′′ W. (Plum Island Harbor West Dolphin Light).
( d ) A line drawn from 41°10′25.745′′ N., 072°12′42.137′ W. (Plum Gut Light) to 41°09′48.393′′ N., 072°13′25.014′′ W. (Orient Point Light); thence to Orient Point.
( e ) A line drawn from 41°06′35.100′′ N., 072°18′21.400′′ W. (Long Beach Bar Light) to Cornelius Point.
( f ) A line drawn from 41°04′12.000′′ N., 072°16′48.000′′ W. (Coecles Harbor Entrance Light) to Sungic Point.
( g ) A line drawn from Nicholl Point to 41°02′25.166′′ N., 072°15′42.971′′ W. (Cedar Island Light 3CI).
( h ) A line drawn from 41°02′06.060′′ N., 072°11′19.560′′ W. (Threemile Harbor West Breakwater Light) to 41°02′05.580′′ N., 072°11′15.777′′ W. (Threemile Harbor East Breakwater Light).
( i ) A line drawn from 41°04′44.210′′ N., 071°56′20.308′′ W. (Montauk West Jetty Light 2) to 41°04′46.095′′ N., 071°56′14.168′′ W. (Montauk East Jetty Light 1).
[USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44280, July 27, 2015, as amended by USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35080, July 28, 2017]
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.717 Mediation. ( a ) GSA promptly refers to the mediation agency designated by the Secretary, HHS, all sufficient complaints that: ( 1 ) Fall within the jurisdiction of the Act and this regulation, unless the age distinction complained of is clearly within an exception; and
( 2 ) Contain the information needed for further processing.
( b ) Both the complainant and the recipient must participate in the mediation process to the extent necessary to reach an agreement or make an informed judgement that an agreement is not possible. Both parties need not meet with the mediator at the same time.
( c ) If the complainant and the recipient agree, the mediator will prepare a written statement of the agreement and have the complainant and the recipient sign it. The mediator must send a copy of the agreement to GSA. GSA takes no further action on the complaint unless the complainant or the recipient fails to comply with the agreement.
( d ) The mediator must protect the confidentiality of all information obtained in the course of the mediation. No mediator may testify in any adjudicative proceeding, produce any document, or otherwise disclose any information obtained in the course of the mediation process without prior approval of the head of the mediation agency.
( e ) The mediation proceeds for a maximum of 60 calendar days after a complaint is filed with GSA. Mediation ends if: ( 1 ) 60 calendar days elapse from the time the complaint is filed; or
( 2 ) Before the end of the 60 calendar-day period an agreement is reached; or
( 3 ) Before the end of that 60 calendar-day period, the mediator finds that an agreement cannot be reached. Note:
The 60 calendar day period may be extended by the mediator, with the concurrence of GSA, for not more than 30 calendar days if the mediator determines that agreement is likely to be reached during the extension period.
( f ) The mediator must return unresolved complaints to GSA.
#### § 101-30.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the types of items to be cataloged, the types of items to be excluded from the Federal Catalog System, the responsibilities for catalog data preparation and transmission to the Defense Logistics Services Center (DLSC), and the application of item entry control procedures upon request for cataloging action.

[42 FR 36255, July 14, 1977]
#### § 101-3.000 Cross-reference to the Federal Management Regulation (FMR) (41 CFR chapter 102, parts 102-1 through 102-220).

For information on annual real property inventories previously contained in this part, see FMR part 84 (41 CFR part 102-84).
Exhibit 21.1

SILVERSTAR HOLDINGS, LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
        PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES
        AS OF JUNE 30, 2007



|Name                                                         | State of
                    Incorporation | Conducts Business
                    Under
|------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------
|Empire Interactive,
                    PLC                  | United Kingdom                             | Same                                       
|Empire Interactive Europe
                    Limited        | United Kingdom                             | Same                                       
|Empire Interactive
                    Inc.                  | United Kingdom                             | Same                                       
|Empire Interactive Holdings
                    Limited      | United Kingdom                             | Same                                       
|First South African
                    Holdings (Pty), Ltd. | South Africa                               | Same                                       
|First South Africa
                    Management Corp.      | Delaware                                   | Silverstar
                    Holdings    
|Fantasy Sports, Inc.
                    (Dormant)           | Delaware                                   | Same                                       
|Silverstar Holdings,
                    Inc.                | Delaware                                   | Silverstar
                    Holdings    
|Strategy First,
                    Inc.                     | Quebec, Canada                             | Same                                       
|Silverstar Holdings,
                    Ltd.                | Bermuda                                    | Same                                       
|Silverstar Acquisitions,
                    PLC             | United Kingdom                             | Same                                       
|Razorworks Limited
                    (Dormant)             | United Kingdom                             | Same                                       
|Xplosiv Limited
                    (Dormant)                | United Kingdom                             | Same
§ 52.32 Administrative closure. ( a ) The Chair may administratively close a case after it has been docketed and at any time prior to its consideration by the Board if the Chair determines that: ( 1 ) The application was erroneously docketed because the application did not meet the criteria under § 52.21;
( 2 ) Effective relief cannot be granted by the Board;
( 3 ) The Board does not have jurisdiction to determine the issues presented or the applicant has not exhausted an available administrative remedy, as required under § 52.13(b); or
( 4 ) The Coast Guard has granted effective relief satisfactory to the applicant.
( b ) Administrative closure does not constitute a denial of relief. Applicants who believe their cases should not have been administratively closed by the Chair may resubmit their applications with a request for further consideration and a statement explaining why the applicant believes his or her case should be docketed and considered by the Board. A request for further consideration shall be regarded as a new application for the purposes of §§ 52.21 and 52.26.
( c ) If the Chair administratively closes a case, the applicant shall be advised of the reason and of the right to resubmit his or her application.
§ 963.4 Presiding Officer. ( a ) The presiding officer shall be an Administrative Law Judge or an Administrative Judge qualified in accordance with law. The Judicial Officer assigns cases under this part. Judicial Officer includes Associate Judicial Officer upon delegation thereto. The Judicial Officer may, on his or her own initiative or for good cause found, preside at the reception of evidence.
( b ) The presiding officer has authority to: ( 1 ) Take such action as may be necessary properly to preside over the proceeding and render decision therein;
( 2 ) Render an initial decision, if the presiding officer is not the Judicial Officer, which becomes the final agency decision unless a timely appeal is taken; the Judicial Officer may issue a tentative or a final decision.
[52 FR 18912, May 20, 1987, as amended at 62 FR 4459, Jan. 30, 1997]
EXHIBIT C 

Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 7
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 2 of 7
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 3 of 7
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 4 of 7
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 5 of 7
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 6 of 7
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 7 of 7
§ 3010.105 Consideration of matters before the Commission. ( a ) Unless it orders otherwise, the Commission shall sit *en banc* in all matters that come before it. In those proceedings in which a presiding officer is appointed, the Commission will continue to sit *en banc,* unless modified by Commission notice or order, with the presiding officer responsible for those matters within the scope of the presiding officer's authority.
( b ) A decision to establish a docket (other than certain negotiated service agreement dockets), close an active docket, or reach a final decision in any docket shall be by majority vote of the Commissioners then in office.
§ 334.600 TRIDENT Basin adjacent to Canaveral Harbor at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Brevard County, Fla.; danger zone. ( a ) *The danger zone.* From the west side of the access channel at latitude 28°24′37′′, longitude 80°35′35′′ to the east side of the access channel at latitude 28°24′37′′, longitude 80°35′26′′ and the entire basin.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) No unauthorized person or vessel shall enter the area. The area will be used for loading and unloading explosives. The entrance to the basin will be marked by suitable boundary signs.
( 2 ) The regulations will be enforced by the Commanding Officer, Naval Ordnance Test Unit, Patrick Air Force Base, Florida, or such agencies he may designate.
[41 FR 17898, Apr. 29, 1976. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17554, Apr. 10, 1997]
{"agency":"CNCS","generated":"2020-10-14 17:15:38","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"},{"label":"2019","value":"2019"},{"label":"2020","value":"2020"}],"value":"2020"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"8"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"8"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CNCS"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["11"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["10"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["1"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2020","quarter":"Q4"}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 0:22-cv-62135-KMM

MINDEN PICTURES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SEPI MARKETING CORP.,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Bill of Costs. (“Motion”

or “Mot”) (ECF No. 17). The matter was referred to the Honorable Lauren Fleischer Louis, United 

States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 20). On July 14, 2023, Magistrate Judge Louis issued a Report 

and Recommendation, (“R&R”) (ECF No. 23), recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion be 

GRANTED. No objections were received, and the time to do so has passed. The matter is now 

ripe for review. As set forth below, the Court ADOPTS the R&R. 

The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 

recommendations made by the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(3). 

The Court “must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.” Fed. 

R. Crim. P. 59(b)(3). A de novo review is therefore required if a party files “a proper, specific 

objection” to a factual finding contained in the report. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 

784 (11th Cir. 2006). “It is critical that the objection be sufficiently specific and not a general 

objection to the report” to warrant de novo review. Id.

Yet when a party has not properly objected to the magistrate judge’s findings, “the court 

Case 0:22-cv-62135-KMM Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the 

recommendation.” See Keaton v. United States, No. 14-21230-CIV, 2015 WL 12780912, at *1 

(S.D. Fla. May 4, 2015); see also Lopez v. Berryhill, No. 17-CV-24263, 2019 WL 2254704, at *2 

(S.D. Fla. Feb. 26, 2019) (stating that a district judge “evaluate[s] portions of the R & R not 

objected to under a clearly erroneous standard of review” (citing Davis v. Apfel, 93 F. Supp. 2d 

1313, 1317 (M.D. Fla. 2000))).

In her Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Louis concludes that: (1) Plaintiff 

is entitled to recover its filing fees in the amount of $402.00, see R&R at 3–4; and (2) Plaintiff is 

entitled to recover $41.60 in fees for the service of summons, see id. at 4. This Court agrees.

Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the R&R, the pertinent portions 

of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED that Magistrate Judge Louis’s R&R (ECF No. 23) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Motion 

for Bill of Costs (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $443.60 in costs.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ____ day of August, 2023.

K. MICHAEL MOORE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

c: All counsel of record

2nd

Case 0:22-cv-62135-KMM Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/02/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        C.E.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(B) AND 15D-14(B)

     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the period ending September 2, 2006 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to  Exchange  Act Rules 13a-14(b) and
15d-14(b)  and  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350  (as  adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002)  that  he  is  the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered  in  the  Report.

/s/ Michael A. Richardson
-------------------------
Michael A. Richardson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
American Consumers, Inc.


Date:  October 17, 2006
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5348

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit the application

of the one-year lag in the intern and resident-to-bed ration and the

rolling average for the number of residents for which payments to hospitals are made under the medicare program for the indirect costs of

graduate medical education to residents in the fields of allopathic and

osteopathic medicine.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 2000

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit

the application of the one-year lag in the intern and

resident-to-bed ration and the rolling average for the

number of residents for which payments to hospitals

are made under the medicare program for the indirect

costs of graduate medical education to residents in the

fields of allopathic and osteopathic medicine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5348 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION OF APPLICATION OF REDUCTION

2 OF NUMBERS OF RESIDENTS FOR IME PAY3 MENTS TO CERTAIN RESIDENTS.

4 (a) MEDICARE IME ROLLING AVERAGE AND IRB

5 FREEZE.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(vi) of

7 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

8 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(vi)) is amended by adding at the

9 end the following: ‘‘The limitation under subclause

10 (I) and the total number determined under sub11 clause (II) shall apply only to residents in the fields

12 of allopathic medicine or osteopathic medicine.’’.

13 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading

14 of section 1886(h)(4)(G) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

15 1395ww(h)(4)(G)) is amended by inserting ‘‘IN

16 ALLOPATHIC AND OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE ONLY’’

17 after ‘‘RESIDENTS AND INTERNS’’.

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

19 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact20 ment of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Public Law

21 105–33).

Æ
ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY

Exhibit 32

                 Section 1350 Certifications


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allen Organ
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and
2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result
  of operations of the Company.


Date: November 12, 2004



/s/STEVEN MARKOWITZ             /s/NATHAN S. ECKHART
Steven Markowitz                Nathan S. Eckhart
Chief Executive Officer         Chief Financial Officer

                                   -15-