alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 101-26.703 Marginally punched continuous forms. GSA has delegated authority to the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) to procure all marginally punched continuous forms for use by Federal agencies except those procured by GSA for stock. Therefore, all Federal agencies shall submit their requirements for such forms in accordance with the provisions of this § 101-26.703. ( a ) Except for those marginally punched continuous forms which GSA procures for stock, all requirements for such forms shall be ordered from GPO contracts or other established GPO sources. If an item is available from GSA stock, acquisition shall be from this source.
( b ) Requirements for marginally punched continuous forms which are not available from GPO or GSA sources or which exceed the maximum monetary limitations of the GPO contract shall be submitted to GPO for appropriate action. If requirements are less than the minimum orders/shipment limitations of the GPO contract, agencies may procure them directly from commercial sources.
[39 FR 20600, June 12, 1974]
§ 955.6 Motions. ( a ) Any motion addressed to the jurisdiction of the Board shall be promptly filed. Oral argument on the motion may be afforded on application of either party, in the Board's discretion, or on the Board's initiative. The Board may at any time and on its own initiative raise the issue of its jurisdiction to proceed with a particular case.
( b ) A motion filed in lieu of an answer shall be filed no later than the date on which the answer is required to be filed or such later date as may be established by Board order. Any other dispositive motion shall be filed as soon as practicable after the grounds therefor are known.
( c ) Motions for summary judgment may be considered by the Board. However, the Board may defer ruling on a motion for summary judgment, in its discretion, until after a hearing or other presentation of evidence. Motions for summary judgment may be filed only when a party believes that, based upon uncontested material facts, it is entitled to relief as a matter of law. The parties are to consider proceeding by submission of the case without a hearing in accordance with § 955.12, in lieu of a motion for summary judgment. ( 1 ) Motions for summary judgment shall include a separate document titled *Statement of Uncontested Facts,* which shall contain in separately numbered paragraphs all of the material facts upon which the moving party bases its motion and as to which it contends there is no genuine issue. This statement shall include references to affidavits, declarations and/or documents relied upon to support such statement.
( 2 ) The opposing party shall file with its opposition a separate document titled *Statement of Genuine Issues.* This document shall identify, by reference to specific paragraph numbers in the moving party's Statement of Uncontested Facts, those facts as to which the opposing party claims there is a genuine issue necessary to be litigated. An opposing party shall state the precise nature of its disagreement, and support its opposition with references to affidavits, declarations and/or documents that demonstrate the existence of a genuine dispute.
( 3 ) The moving party and the non-moving party shall each submit a memorandum of law supporting or opposing summary judgment.
( 4 ) If, despite reasonable efforts, the opposing party cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition, the Board may defer ruling on the motion to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or other discovery to be conducted, or may issue such other order as is just. The parties should not expect the Board to search the record for evidence in support of either party's position.
[74 FR 20592, May 5, 2009, as amended at 76 FR 37660, June 28, 2011]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

RAY F. BUENO,

an individual, 

 Case No.: 22-22831-Civ-Scola

Plaintiff,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI,

A Florida Non-Profit Corporation,

EQUIFAX INFORMATION 

SERVICES, LLC, 

a foreign limited liability company, and

TRANS UNION, LLC,

a foreign limited liability company,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS

TO DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC

Plaintiff, RAY F. BUENO (hereinafter, “Plaintiff”), and Defendant, Trans 

Union, LLC hereby file this Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant 

Trans Union, LLC as follows:

There are no longer any issues in this matter between Plaintiff and Trans Union, 

LLC to be determined by this Court. Plaintiff and Trans Union, LLC hereby stipulate 

that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all causes of action that were or could 

have been asserted against Trans Union, LLC are dismissed with prejudice, with court 

costs and attorneys’ fees to be paid by the party incurring the same.

Dated: June 9, 2023

Case 1:22-cv-22831-RNS Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Respectfully submitted,

Swift, Isringhaus & Dubbeld, P.A.

/s/ Jon P. Dubbeld

Jon P. Dubbeld, Esq.

FBN 105869

8380 Bay Pine Blvd.

St. Petersburg, FL 33709

Phone: (727) 300-1929

Fax: (727) 255-5332

jdubbeld@swift-law.com

jmurphy@swift-law.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett 

& Moser, P.C.

/s/ Alexandria Epps

Alexandria Epps, Esq.

FBN 1002739

6900 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 800

Plano, TX 75024

Phone: (214) 560-5463

Fax: (214) 871-2111

aepps@qslwm.com

Counsel for Defendant, 

Trans Union, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 9, 2023, I filed a true and correct copy of 

the above and foregoing Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant Trans 

Union, LLC via CM/ECF and will serve a copy of the same to counsel of record for all 

parties.

/s/ Jon P. Dubbeld

Attorney

Case 1:22-cv-22831-RNS Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 102-118.575 If a TSP disagrees with the decision of my agency, can the TSP appeal?

Yes, the TSP may file a claim with the GSA Transportation Audits Division, which will review the TSP's appeal of your agency's final full or partial denial of a claim. The TSP may also appeal to the GSA Transportation Audits Division if your agency has not responded to a challenge within 30 days.

[87 FR 32326, May 31, 2022]
CERTIFICATION

OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Richard Govatski, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NMXS.com, Inc.

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this amended yearly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended yearly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended yearly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended yearly report;

 

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the a registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this amended yearly report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended yearly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

(c) presented in this amended yearly report my conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date

 

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

 

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.  I have indicated in this amended yearly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Dated: March 31, 2006

 

/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski

Chief Executive Officer
§ 255.8 Access to postal facilities. ( a ) *Legal requirements and policy* — ( 1 ) *ABA Standards.* Where the design standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4151 *et seq.,* do not apply, the Postal Service may perform a discretionary retrofit to a facility in accordance with this part to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
( 2 ) *Discretionary modifications.* The Postal Service may modify facilities not legally required to conform to ABA standards when it determines that doing so would be consistent with efficient postal operations. In determining whether modifications not legally required should be made, due regard is to be given to: ( i ) The cost of the discretionary modification;
( ii ) The number of individuals to be benefited by the modification;
( iii ) The inconvenience, if any, to the general public;
( iv ) The anticipated useful life of the modification to the Postal Service;
( v ) Any requirement to restore a leased premises to its original condition at the expiration of the lease, and the cost of such restoration;
( vi ) The historic or architectural significance of the property in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 16 U.S.C. 470 *et seq.;*
( vii ) The availability of other options to foster service accessibility; and
( viii ) Any other factor that is relevant and appropriate to the decision.
( b ) *Inquiries and requests.* ( 1 ) Inquiries concerning access to postal facilities, and requests for discretionary alterations of postal facilities not covered by the design standards of the ABA, may be made to the local postal manager of the facility involved.
( 2 ) The local postal manager's response to a request or complaint regarding an alteration to a facility will be made after consultation with the district manager or the area manager. If the determination is made that modification to meet ABA design standards is not required, a discretionary alteration may be made on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the criteria listed in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. If a discretionary alteration is not made, the local postal manager should determine if a special arrangement for postal services under § 255.7 can be provided.
{"agency":"CNCS","generated":"2019-04-03 14:11:25","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2019"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"4"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["CNCS"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["10"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["14"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2019","quarter":"Q2"}
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5484

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a windfall profits

tax on electricity sold in Orange and San Diego Counties in California

during the summer of 2000.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 18, 2000

Mr. BILBRAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose

a windfall profits tax on electricity sold in Orange and

San Diego Counties in California during the summer

of 2000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electricity Windfall

5 Profit Tax Act of 2000’’.
2

•HR 5484 IH

1 SEC. 2. WINDFALL PROFITS TAX ON ELECTRICITY SOLD IN

2 CERTAIN CALIFORNIA COUNTIES DURING

3 THE SUMMER OF 2000.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle E of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to alcohol, tobacco, and cer6 tain other excise taxes) is amended by adding at the end

7 thereof the following new chapter:

8 ‘‘CHAPTER 55—WINDFALL PROFIT ON

9 CERTAIN ELECTRICITY

‘‘Sec. 5886. Imposition of tax.

10 ‘‘SEC. 5886. IMPOSITION OF TAX.

11 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In addition to any other tax im12 posed under this title, there is hereby imposed an excise

13 tax equal to the windfall profit on the retail sale of elec14 tricity for use in Orange and San Diego Counties in Cali15 fornia during June, July, or August of 2000.

16 ‘‘(b) WINDFALL PROFIT.—For purposes of this sec17 tion, the term ‘windfall profit’ means, with respect to any

18 sale, so much of the profit on such sale as exceeds a just

19 and reasonable profit.

20 ‘‘(c) LIABILITY FOR PAYMENT OF TAX.—The tax im21 posed by subsection (a) shall be paid by the seller and

22 shall be paid not later than November 1, 2000.’’
3

•HR 5484 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters

2 for subtitle E of such Code is amended by adding at the

3 end the following new item:

‘‘Chapter 55. Windfall profit on certain electricity.’’

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall take effect on June 1, 2000.

6 (d) APPROPRIATIONS OF REVENUES TO ORANGE AND

7 SAN DIEGO COUNTIES.—There is hereby appropriated

8 from the general fund of the Treasury an amount equal

9 to the revenues received in the Treasury under chapter

10 55 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by

11 this Act). The amount appropriated under the preceding

12 sentence shall be paid to Orange and San Diego Counties

13 in California to provide relief to residents for the high

14 costs of electricity incurred during the summer of 2000.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7028

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TROY LAMONT CHEESE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-155) Submitted: December 14, 1999 Decided: February 4, 2000 Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy Lamont Cheese, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Troy Cheese appeals the district court's order denying motions for an order directing Cheese’s former trial counsel to provide him with materials from his file, and for disclosure of the jury selection process and racial makeup of the district. Cheese seeks this material in order to prepare a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999), attacking his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 846 (West Supp. 1999). We affirm the district court's order. In his § 2255 motion, Cheese need only set forth in summary form the claims he wishes to raise and the facts supporting those claims. Rule 2(b), Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings. The materials necessary to evaluate those claims will be available to the district court through its own file or material submitted by the Government in support of its answer. Rules 4(b), 5(b), Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings. Should Cheese conclude at that point that additional material is necessary, he may seek discovery from the district court. Rule 6(a), Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings. Therefore, we affirm the district court's denial of Cheese's motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 3050.40 Additional financial reporting. ( a ) *In general.* The Postal Service shall file with the Commission: ( 1 ) Within 40 days after the end of each fiscal quarter, a quarterly report containing the information required by the Securities and Exchange Commission to be included in quarterly reports under sections 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m, 78o(d)) on Form 10-Q, as such form (or any successor form) may be revised from time to time;
( 2 ) Within 60 days after the end of each fiscal year, an annual report containing the information required by the Securities and Exchange Commission to be included in annual reports under such sections on Form 10-K, as such form (or any successor form) may be revised from time to time; and
( 3 ) Periodic reports within the time frame and containing the information prescribed in Form 8-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission, as such form (or any successor form) may be revised from time to time.
( b ) *Internal control report.* For purposes of defining the reports required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the Postal Service shall comply with the rules prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission implementing section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7262), beginning with the annual report for fiscal year 2010.
( c ) *Financial reporting.* The reports required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall include, with respect to the Postal Service's pension and post-retirement health obligations: ( 1 ) The funded status of the Postal Service's pension and post-retirement health obligations;
( 2 ) Components of the net change in the fund balances and obligations and the nature and cause of any significant changes;
( 3 ) Components of net periodic costs;
( 4 ) Cost methods and assumptions underlying the relevant actuarial valuations;
( 5 ) The effect of a 1 percentage point increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate for each future year on the service and interest costs components of net periodic post-retirement health cost and the accumulated obligation;
( 6 ) Actual contributions to and payments from the funds for the years presented and the estimated future contributions and payments for each of the following 5 years;
( 7 ) The composition of plan assets reflected in the fund balances; and
( 8 ) The assumed rate of return on fund balances and the actual rates of return for the years presented.
( d ) *Time of filing.* Within 5 business days of receiving the data listed under paragraph (c) of this section from the Office of Personnel Management, the Postal Service shall provide two copies of that data to the Commission.
( e ) *Segment reporting.* ( 1 ) Beginning with reports for fiscal year 2010, for purposes of the reports required under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section, the Postal Service shall include segment reporting.
( 2 ) The Postal Service shall determine the appropriate segment reporting under paragraph (e)(1) of this section after consultation with the Commission.
#### § 101-30.705 GSA assistance.

Activities requiring assistance in fulfilling their responsibilities under the program shall contact the General Services Administration (FRI), Washington, DC 20406.

[46 FR 35647, July 10, 1981]
Report of Independent Public Accountants

 

To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements of Household Finance Corporation (the "Company") and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and have issued our report thereon dated January 14, 2002.  We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2001, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report on those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Company was not in compliance with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated November 1, 1999, in conjunction with the Closed End Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series 1999-1 insofar as they relate to accounting matters.  It should be noted, however, that our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the Companys system of internal accounting controls over the Companys closed end home equity loan portfolio, including those loans serviced under the Agreement to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with these standards, the purpose of our study and evaluation, which included obtaining an understanding of the accounting systems, was to determine the nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the financial statements.  Our study and evaluation also took into consideration certain of the criteria and audit requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of Non-Supervised Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.  However, certain procedures included in the audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans being serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records relating to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that, in our opinion, Section 3.11 of the Agreement required us to report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors and management of the Company and should not be used for any other purpose.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Chicago, Illinois

January 14, 2002