alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 102-118.15 What is a transportation payment?

A transportation payment is a payment made by an agency to a TSP for the movement of goods, people or transportation related services.

[65 FR 24569, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 81 FR 65299, Sept. 22, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5598 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5598

                   For the relief of Barbara Makuch.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2000

 Mr. Reynolds introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Barbara Makuch.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

    In consideration of the fact that Barbara Makuch--
            (1) served 22 years as a foreign counterintelligence agent 
        and dedicated her life to assist the Federal Bureau of 
        Investigation in its efforts at the height of the Cold War to 
        combat communism, the Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti 
        (KGB), and the Soviet Union;
            (2) was presented the Louis E. Peters Memorial Service 
        Award, the highest civilian award presented by the Federal 
        Bureau of Investigation, for her valorous service; and
            (3) has not received employment assistance or health, 
        social security, or pension benefits, despite assurances that 
        she would receive such benefits upon her retirement,
the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds not otherwise 
appropriated, the sum of $1,000,000 to Barbara Makuch of East Amherst, 
New York, in compensation for the lifetime aggregate value of benefits 
earned but not received by Barbara Makuch.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM.

    The sum paid under section 1 shall be in full satisfaction of any 
claims that Barbara Makuch may have against the United States arising 
out of her service for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the sum paid under section 1 shall be 
paid to or received by any agent or attorney for services rendered in 
connection with the recovery of such sum. Any person who violates this 
section shall be fined under title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 101-28.301 Applicability.

This subpart is applicable to all activities that are eligible to use customer supply centers. Eligible activities include executive agencies, elements of the legislative and judicial branches of the Government, and cost reimbursable contractors. Customer supply centers are for the use of activities located within the market area of a customer supply center as determined by GSA.
Editorial Note on Part 101-8
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-8.307 Employment criteria. ( a ) A recipient may not use an employment test or other selection criterion that screens out or tends to screen out handicapped persons unless the test score or other selection criterion, as used by the recipient, is shown to be job-related for the position in question.
( b ) A recipient shall ensure that employment tests are adapted for use by persons who have handicaps that impair sensory, manual, or speaking skills except where those skills are the factors that the test purports to measure.
#### § 3011.204 Protections for any person other than the submitter with a proprietary interest.

Any person other than the submitter with a proprietary interest in materials that have been or will be submitted to the Commission may address any confidentiality concerns directly with the Commission by seeking non-public treatment in accordance with the requirements of this subpart, responding to a motion for access to non-public materials in accordance with the requirements of subpart C of this part, or responding to a motion for disclosure of non-public materials in accordance with the requirements of subpart D of this part.
# AGENCY:

 Food and Drug Administration, HHS. 

# ACTION:

 Notice.

This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will be open to the public. 

*Name of Committee*: Allergenic Products Advisory Committee.                 

*General Function of the Committee*: To provide advice and recommendations to the agency on FDA's regulatory issues.                 

*Date and Time*: The meeting will be held on February 10, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.                 

*Location*: Holiday Inn, Versailles Ballrooms I and II, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD.                 

*Contact Person*: William Freas or Pearline K. Muckelvene, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-71), Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-0314, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), code 12388. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.                 

*Agenda*: The committee will receive an update on the organizational changes of the Laboratory of Immunobiochemistry, its regulatory activities (including reference replacements and lot release statistics) and its research activities. The committee will hear presentations and discuss the following regulatory issues: (1) Potency limits for standardized allergen vaccines, (2) selection of allergen extracts for standardization, and (3) a proposed algorithm for the standardization of new allergens.                 

*Procedure*: On February 10, 2000, from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., the meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may present data, information, or views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. Written submissions may be made to the contact person by January 26, 2000. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between approximately 11 a.m. and 12 m. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. Those desiring to make formal oral presentations should notify the contact person before February 3, 2000, and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to make their presentation.                 

Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2). 

Dated: January 11, 2000. 

Linda A. Suydam, 

Senior Associate Commissioner. 

[FR Doc. 00-1543 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
§ 960.9 Contents of application. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and expenses under the Act shall identify the applicant and the proceeding for which an award is sought. The application shall show that the applicant has prevailed and identify the position of the Postal Service in the proceeding that the applicant alleges was not substantially justified. Unless the applicant is an individual, the application shall also state the number of employees of the applicant and describe briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business.
( b ) The application shall also include a statement that the applicant's net worth does not exceed $2 million (if an individual) or $7 million (for all other applicants, including their affiliates.) However, an applicant may omit this statement if: ( 1 ) It attaches a copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) or, in the case of a tax-exempt organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status, a statement that describes the basis for the applicant's belief that it qualifies under such section; or
( 2 ) It states on the application that it is a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)).
( c ) The application shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought.
( d ) The application may also include any other matters that the applicant wishes the Postal Service to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( e ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application is true and correct.
[46 FR 45945, Sept. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 6798, Mar. 5, 1987]
§ 102-117.375 Are there instances where a Transportation Officer warrant is not necessary to acquire transportation services? Yes, a Transportation Officer warrant is not necessary to: ( a ) Ship packages through a contract under the GSA Schedules program, including any Blanket Purchase Agreement, as these are FAR-based contracts;
( b ) Ship packages or other materials through any other FAR-based contract; or
( c ) Send items through the United States Postal Service.
#### § 101-27.405 Criteria for elimination.

Inactive items, items which no longer qualify as standby, and slow-moving items which are readily available, when needed, from Government or commercial sources shall be eliminated from inventory. The determination of a slow-moving item shall be based on a comparison of the costs for continuing to maintain it in stock as opposed to the costs for ordering it from outside sources each time it is requested. This comparison shall also consider any difference in price and transportation costs for each alternative. In the absence of criteria for stockage of an item developed and used by an agency, the desired results will be obtained through application of the following table:

| Orders per year under economic order quantity (EOQ) | Minimum number of requests per year to justify continuation in stock |
| --- | --- |
| 12 and over | 24 |
| 11 | 22 |
| 10 | 20 |
| 9 | 18 |
| 8 | 16 |
| 7 | 14 |
| 6 | 12 |
| 5 | 10 |
| 4 | 8 |
| 3 and under | 7 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| **Note:** Except for the low dollar infrequently ordered item, which requires a higher minimum, an item should be discontinued from stock if the number of requests for it is less than twice its order frequency under EOQ. For example, an item ordered six times per year under EOQ should have at least 12 requests per year to continue stockage. For 11 requests, it would cost less to order each time it was requested. | |

| 11 orders at $5 per order | $55 |
| Under EOQ: | |
| 6 orders at $5 per order | $30 |
| Holding cost (equal to ordering cost) | 30 |
| Total | 60 |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5003 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5003

 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve 
   payments under the Medicare outpatient prospective payment system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve 
   payments under the Medicare outpatient prospective payment system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Hospital Outpatient 
Excellence Act of 2000'' or the ``Medicare HOPE Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF REDUCTION IN MARKET BASKET PERCENTAGE INCREASE 
              FOR 2001 AND 2002.

    Section 1833(t)(3)(C)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395l(t)(3)(C)(iii)) is amended by striking ``in each of 2000, 2001, 
and 2002'' and inserting ``in 2000''.

SEC. 3. MAKING PERMANENT HOLD HARMLESS PROVISION FOR SMALL RURAL 
              HOSPITALS.

    Section 1833(t)(7)(D) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395l(t)(7)(D)) is amended by striking ``January 1, 2004'' and 
inserting ``January 1, 2007''.

SEC. 4. EXTENSION OF CORRIDOR PAYMENTS OVER 4 YEARS.

    Section 1833(t)(7) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395l(t)(7)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking ``Before 2002'' and inserting 
                ``First 2 years''; and
                    (B) by striking ``before January 1, 2002,'' and 
                inserting ``during the first two 12-month periods in 
                which this subsection is effective'';
            (2) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``2002'' and 
                inserting ``Third year''; and
                    (B) by striking ``during 2002,'' and inserting 
                ``during the third 12-month period in which this 
                subsection is effective''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (C)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``2003'' and 
                inserting ``Fourth year''; and
                    (B) by striking ``during 2003,'' and inserting 
                ``during the fourth 12-month period in which this 
                subsection is effective''.
                                 <all>
```
Corporation for National and Community Service

Board of Directors

Resolution

WHEREAS, section 193A(b)(4)(A) of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 as
amended directs the Chief Executive Officer to “prepare and submit to the Board of Directors an
evaluation plan for the evaluation of programs established under the national service laws, in
accordance with section 179 of the Act”; and,

WHEREAS, section 192A(g)(4) of the National and Community Service Act of 1990 directs the
Board of Directors to review and approve the agency’s evaluation plan; and,

WHEREAS, the Corporation for National and Community Service has outlined a rigorous and
comprehensive evaluation plan to include initiatives: that support programmatic strategic goals;
that build the case for the investment in service by focusing on the impacts to beneficiaries of
national service, as well as national service participants; that are related to understanding how
the work of the Corporation can be more effective; and that will focus on conducting an internal
assessment to determine what business management practices are effective and where
improvements can be made;

BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors approves the evaluation plan prepared by the
Acting Chief Executive Officer for consideration at the Board of Directors’ meeting on February
8, 2012.

Approved by voice vote, February 8, 2012

Resolution 2012 - 03
September 17, 2015

Mr. Dennis D. Pinciaro

Sedona Drone

PO Box 21063

Sedona AZ 86341

Dear Mr. Pinciaro:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1 ), 91.409(a)(1) and 

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b), of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains 

why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your June 19, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Sedona Drone filed in 

Docket No. FAA−2015−2571, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.215-2 Forms and instructions.

Each responsible GSA official shall issue and promptly make available to interested persons forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating this subpart 101-6.2 as applied to programs to which this subpart applies and for which he is responsible.
Exhibit 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with this Yearly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company")  on
Form  10-KSB  for  the  year ending December 31,  2003,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Teresa  B.  Dickey, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies  to
the  best  of  his  knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Teresa B. Dickey
----------------------
Teresa B. Dickey
Principal Financial Officer

March 30, 2004
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

Add the work hours. parts cost, and number of U.S. registered products to the table below. When you are 

finished. click on the ··Update Fields " button to automatically fill in the totals. 

Update Fields I 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection 13 349 

The known number of products in com pi iance: Number 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $385,645 

Costs covered under watTanty (if known) $Warranty 

On-Condition Costs: • 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Repair 16 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a ·'significant regulatory action"? G 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES* 0 NO 181 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. G 

YES 0 NO 181 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? G 

YES* 0 NO 181 

*Explanation:
#### CHARLES E. STRONG, Receiver, etc., Respondent, *v.*THE NEW YORK LAUNDRY MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others, Appellants.

*Bequest by defendant far dwectwn of*verdict— *effect.*

Where a defendant requests the court to direct a verdict in his favor, he thereby assumes that there is no dispute as to the facts, and allows the justice presiding to be substituted in the place of the jury, and is concluded by his *529findings. He cannot, therefore, upon appeal under a general exception to the subsequent direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, insist that there were questions in the case which should have been submitted to the jury. *{Winehell*v. *Hicks,*18 N. Y., 558; *Marine Bank*v. *Olements,*31 id., 33; *O’Neill*v. *James,*43 id., 85; *Stone*v. *Flow&r,*47 id., 566.)

. Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon a verdict directed by the court.

*Robert Sewell,*for the appellants. *S. P. Nash*and *John L. Oadamlader,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 2 of 10
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 3 of 10
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 4 of 10
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 5 of 10
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 6 of 10
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 7 of 10
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 8 of 10
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 9 of 10
Case 1:00-cr-00930-PCH Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2001 Page 10 of 10