alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Amazing  Investments,  Inc. on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003,  as filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 101-26.602 Fuels and packaged petroleum products obtained from or through the Defense Logistics Agency. ( a ) Agencies shall be governed by the provisions of this § 101-26.602 in satisfying requirements for coal, natural gas from sources other than a public utility, petroleum fuels, and certain petroleum products from or through the Defense Logistics Agency.
( b ) The Defense Logistics Agency has been assigned the supply responsibility for these materials which will be available either from contracts (or contracts summarized in contract bulletins) issued by the Defense Fuel Supply Center, Alexandria, Va., or through FEDSTRIP/MILSTRIP requisitions placed on the Defense General Supply Center, Richmond, Va., in accordance with instructions contained in § 101-26.602-2. Agencies submitting estimates of requirements which are summarized in the Defense Fuel Supply Center contract bulletins are obligated to procure such requirements from these contracts. Estimates submitted shall not include requirements normally obtained through service station deliveries utilizing the U.S. Government National Credit Card.
[42 FR 58748, Nov. 11, 1977, as amended at 57 FR 21895, May 26, 1992]
#### § 102-194.20 What is an electronic Standard or Optional form?

An electronic Standard or Optional form is an officially prescribed set of data residing in an electronic medium that is used to produce a mirror-like image or as near to a mirror-like image as the creation software will allow of the officially prescribed form.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      AMERICAN CONSUMERS, INC.
                                 NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

                                             EXHIBIT 11

                                              THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED        TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
                                          ----------------------------  ----------------------------
                                          December 2,    November 26,   December 2,    November 26,
                                              2006           2005           2006           2005
                                          ------------  --------------  ------------  --------------
<S>                                       <C>           <C>             <C>           <C>
Net (loss) income for computing
  (loss) income per common share          $      3,231  $     (33,242)  $     23,578  $     (37,143)
                                          ============  ==============  ============  ==============


Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding during each period               790,191        801,008        794,076        802,851
                                          ============  ==============  ============  ==============


Net (loss) income per common share        $      0.004  $      (0.042)  $      0.030  $      (0.046)
                                          ============  ==============  ============  ==============
</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Anthony ROSSI, Michael Tenore and Joseph Juliano, Appellants.

Nos. 12620-12622.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Nov. 4, 1958.

Decided Nov. 10, 1958.

Anthony A. Calandra, Newark, N. J., for appellant Juliano.

George R. Sommer, Newark, N. J., for appellants Rossi and Tenore.

Chester A. Weidenburner, U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., for appellee.

Before MARIS, GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals by three defendants from their conviction in the District Court for the District of New Jersey upon an indictment for conspiracy to violate the internal revenue laws pertaining to the manufacture of distilled spirits. The case was presented to the jury upon a charge to which no objection is made, the defendants’ sole contention being that there was insufficient evidence produced to support a finding by the jury that they or any of them were members of the conspiracy which was shown to have existed. We have carefully considered the evidence in the light of the appellants’ arguments. No useful purpose would be served by reciting it here in detail. It is enough to say that we are satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict in the case of each of the defendants.

The judgments of the district court will be affirmed.
**Exhibit 10.12AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT     WHEREAS, Allegheny Energy Service Corporation (the “Company”) and David M. Feinberg (the“Employee”) previously entered into a Change in Control Agreement, originally effective as ofOctober 18, 2006 (the “Agreement”).     WHEREAS, effective as of November 1, 2007, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to complywith certain changes in applicable law.     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained herein, and for other good andvaluable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:  1. Section 7(e) shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:     ”(e) The Company shall be entitled to withhold from payments due hereunder anyrequired federal, state or local withholding or other taxes. To the extent that any amountspayable to the Employee under the Agreement hereof are subject to Section 409A(a)(2)(B) ofthe Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), any requirements under theAgreement that such amounts be paid promptly shall not apply and instead such amounts shallbe paid in a lump sum as of the date six months after the Termination Date. The Agreementshall be interpreted to avoid any penalty sanctions under Section 409A of the Code. If anypayment or benefit cannot be provided or made at the time specified herein without incurringsanctions under Section 409A of the Code, then such benefit or payment shall be provided infull at the earliest time thereafter when such sanctions will not be imposed. For purposesof Section 409A of the Code, each payment made under the Agreement shall be treated as aseparate payment and any payment to be made upon a termination of employment under theAgreement may only be made if such termination of employment constitutes a “separation fromservice” as determined under Section 409A of the Code and its corresponding regulations andrelated guidance. All reimbursements and in-kind benefits provided under the Agreementshall be made or provided in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code,including, where applicable, the requirement that (i) any reimbursement is for expensesincurred during the Executive’s lifetime (or during a shorter period of time specified inthe Agreement), (ii) the amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind benefitsprovided, during a calendar year may not affect the expenses eligible for reimbursement, orin-kind benefits to be provided, in any other calendar year, (iii) the reimbursement of aneligible expense will be made on or before the last day of the calendar year following theyear in which the expense is incurred, and (iv) the right to reimbursement or in-kindbenefits is not subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit.”          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment, in the case of theCompany by its duly authorized officer, as of the date set forth above. 
 

 
   Allegheny Energy Service Corporation     /s/ Paul J. Evanson     Name: Paul J. Evanson  Title: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer     /s/ David M. Feinberg      David M. Feinberg   
 **
§ 962.3 Petition for hearing. Within 30 days of receiving the Postal Service's Complaint, issued pursuant to § 273.8 of this title, alleging liability under 31 U.S.C. 3802, the Respondent may request a hearing under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act by filing a written Hearing Petition with the Recorder in accordance with § 962.22(b). The Respondent's Petition must include the following: ( a ) The words “Petition for Hearing Under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act,” or other words reasonably identifying it as such;
( b ) The name of the Respondent as well as his or her work and home addresses, and work and home telephone numbers; or other address and telephone number where the Respondent may be contacted about the hearing proceedings;
( c ) A statement of the date the Respondent received the Complaint issued by the Reviewing Official;
( d ) A statement indicating whether the Respondent requests an oral hearing or a decision on the record;
( e ) If the Respondent requests an oral hearing, a statement proposing a city for the hearing site, with justification for holding the hearing in that city, as well as recommended dates for the hearing; and
( f ) A statement admitting or denying each of the allegations of liability made in the Complaint, and stating any defense on which the Respondent intends to rely.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,097,577
<SECURITIES>                                18,544,440
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,585,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 15,182,907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,398,569
<PP&E>                                      22,485,923
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,323,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,861,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,190,255
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,537,993
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,438,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,861,601
<SALES>                                     41,178,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,178,161
<CGS>                                       26,554,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,554,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,861,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,579,033
<INCOME-TAX>                                   929,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,650,033
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,650,033
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8200

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JAMIE MARCEL GRAHAM, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

District Judge. (3:99-cr-00137-FDW-1) 

Submitted: March 16, 2009 Decided: March 31, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Robert C. Carpenter, JOHN C. HUNTER LAW FIRM, LLC, Asheville, 

North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Timika 

Shafeek, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Jamie Marcel Graham appeals the district court’s order 

partially granting Graham’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) 

motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Graham, 

No. 3:99-cr-00137-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2008). We deny 

Graham’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20494

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE RODRIGUEZ-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CR-734-1

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Rodriguez-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

illegal reentry into the United States following an aggravated

felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the

first time on appeal, Rodriguez-Lopez argues that the sentencing

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) & (2) are unconstitutional in

light of the Supreme Court’s holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000).
No. 03-20494

-2-

Rodriguez-Lopez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed

by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue

for Supreme Court review. Apprendi did not overrule AlmendarezTorres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States

v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Rodriguez-Lopez’s

argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
APPENDIXAResponsibilityforConsentDecreeObligationsafterSaleorTransferoftheFacilityandPassageofthe180-DayPeriodofJointandSeveralLiabilitySectionProvisionDefendantRetains/ObligationDefendantRelieved/ObligationdoesnottransfertonewownerortransferstonewowneroroperatoroperatorIV.CIVILPENALTYCivilPenally-MobilshallpayacivilXpenaltyof$350,000,plusinterestat1.29percentperyearfromthedateofAugust21,2003.V.COMPLLANCEMEASURESMainFlareEmissionLimitsXMonitoring-measureandrecordtheXH2SconcentrationinthefieldgasattheFacilityineachcalendarmonthattheinlettotheMainFlare,andshallcontinuouslymeasureandrecordthevolumeofgascombustedintheMainFlare.OperationandMaintenanceofFlareXDevicesandCompressorsRootCauseAnalysisXNote:ceasestoberequireduponissuanceofthefinalPSDandTitleVpermits.RootCauseAnalysis-CorrectiveXActionNote:ceasestoberequireduponissuanceofthefinalPSDandTitleVpermits.PermittingXXApplyforthepermitswithintheComplywithongoingpermitrequiredtimeframe.requirements.VI.SUPPLEMENTALPayforandcompleteallobligationsXENVIRONMENTALPROJECToftheSEP.VII.COMPLIANCEREPORTINGQuarterlycompliancereports,XANDRECORDKEEPINGemissioncalculations.VIII.STIPULATEDPENALTIESLateorincompletepaymentofcivilXpenalty.VIII.STIPULATEDPENALTIESOtherprovisionsrelatedtoongoingx(Cont.)compliance.IX.RIGHTOFENTRYxX.FORCEMAJEURExX.DISPUTERESOLUTIONXXI.NOTIFICATIONX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BRUCE FRAZIER,

Petitioner

v.

PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON 

PLEAS,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 53 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2017, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are 

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (noting that hybrid 

representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings 

to counsel of record.
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statements of Endocare, Inc. pertaining to the Endocare, Inc.    2004 Stock Incentive Plan, Option Grants to Craig T. Davenport    Pursuant to Written Compensation Agreements, Option Grants to    William J. Nydam Pursuant to Written Compensation Agreements,    Option Grants to Michael R. Rodriguez Pursuant to Written    Compensation Agreements and Option Grant to Katherine Greenberg    Pursuant to Written Compensation Agreement    (Form S-8No. 333-119825),    the Endocare, Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Plan, the    Endocare, Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Director Option    Plan, the Endocare, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Stock Plan and Option    Grant to John V. Cracchiolo Pursuant to Written Compensation    Agreement    (Form S-8No. 333-121702),    the Endocare, Inc. Employee Deferred Stock Unit Program and the    Endocare, Inc. Non-Employee Director Deferred Stock Unit Program    (Form S-8    No    333-134865)    of our reports dated March  8, 2007, with respect to    the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Endocare,    Inc., Endocare, Inc. management’s assessment of the    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and    the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting    of Endocare, Inc., included in the    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2006.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP     Los Angeles, California    March 15, 2007
EXHIBIT 32




C.E.O. and C.F.O. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Consumers, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 27, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) that he is the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.
    /s/ Paul R. CookPaul R. CookChairman and Chief Executive Officer, andChief Financial OfficerAmerican Consumers, Inc.Date:  January 11, 2011
#### § 6.10-9 Appeals.

Persons who are refused employment or who are refused the issuance of documents or who are required to surrender such documents, under this subpart, shall have the right of appeal, and the Commandant shall appoint Boards for acting on such appeals. Each such Board shall, so far as practicable, be composed of one Coast Guard officer, one member drawn from management, and one member drawn from labor. The members drawn from management and labor shall, upon suitable security clearance, be nominated by the Secretary of Labor. Such members shall be deemed to be employees of the United States and shall be entitled to compensation under the provisions of section 15 of the act of August 2, 1946 (5 U.S.C. 55a) while performing duties incident to such employment. The Board shall consider each appeal brought before it and, in recommending final action to the Commandant, shall insure the appellant all fairness consistent with the safeguarding of the national security.
EXHIBIT 9
                                                                       ---------



[GRAPHIC OMITTED] GILBERT LAUSTSEN JUNG
[LOGO]            ASSOCIATES LTD.  Petroleum Consultants
                  4100, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2
                                              (403) 266-9500  Fax (403) 262-1855



                               LETTER OF CONSENT




TO:  U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission



RE:  WESTERN OIL SANDS INC. ANNUAL REPORT FORM 40-F
     ----------------------------------------------


We refer to our report dated March 26, 2004 evaluating the reserves attributable
to Western Oil Sands Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2003 (the
"Report").

We hereby consent to references to our name and to the report in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 40-F to be filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We also confirm that we have read the Annual Information Form and that we have
no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information
contained in it that are derived from the Report or that are within our
knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with the
Report.


                                        Yours very truly,

                                        GILBERT LAUSTSEN JUNG
                                        ASSOCIATES LTD.


                                        /s/ James H. Willmon
                                        --------------------
                                        James H. Willmon, P. Eng.
                                        Vice President


Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Date:    April 27, 2004