alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 534

To amend chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code to permit each

party to certain contracts to accept or reject arbitration as a means

of settling disputes under the contracts.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mrs. BONO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code

to permit each party to certain contracts to accept or

reject arbitration as a means of settling disputes under

the contracts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness and Vol5 untary Arbitration Act’’.
2

•HR 534 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELECTION OF ARBITRATION.

2 (a) SALES AND SERVICE CONTRACTS.—Chapter 1 of

3 title 9 of the United States Code is amended by adding

4 at the end thereof the following new section:

5 ‘‘§ 17. Sales and service contracts

6 ‘‘(a) For purposes of this section, the term ‘sales and

7 service contract’ means a contract under which any person

8 (including any manufacturer, importer or distributor) sells

9 any product to any other person for resale to an ultimate

10 purchaser and authorizes such other person to repair and

11 service such product.

12 ‘‘(b) Whenever a sales and service contract provides

13 for the use of arbitration to resolve a controversy arising

14 out of or relating to the contract, each party to the con15 tract shall have the option, after the controversy arises

16 and before both parties commence an arbitration proceed17 ing, to reject arbitration as the means of settling the con18 troversy. Any such rejection shall be in writing.

19 ‘‘(c) Whenever arbitration is elected to settle a dis20 pute under a sales and service contract, the arbitrator

21 shall provide the parties to the contract with a written

22 explanation of the factual and legal basis for the award.’’.

23 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for

24 chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, is amended by

25 adding at the end thereof the following new item:

‘‘17. Sales and service contracts.’’.
3

•HR 534 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

3 contracts entered into, amended, altered, modified,

4 renewed, or extended after the date of the enactment of

5 this Act.

Æ
§ 245.50 Removal by Corps of Engineers. ( a ) *Non-emergency situations.* In non-emergency situations, the District Engineer may undertake removal action (within the limits of delegation) after all of the following conditions have been met: ( 1 ) A determination has been made, in consultation with the Coast Guard, that the obstruction is a hazard to navigation,
( 2 ) The District Engineer and the Coast Guard agree on a course of action which includes the need for removal (or, if a conflict exists, the need for removal has been resolved at higher level),
( 3 ) The District Engineer has made a reasonable attempt to identify the owner, operator, or lessee, and
( 4 ) Abandonment of the wreck or obstruction has been established.
( b ) *Emergency actions.* In emergency situations, the District Engineer may bypass (within the limits of delegation) any or all of the four conditions in the preceding paragraph if, in his judgment, circumstances require more immediate action, and if either one of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The obstruction impedes or stops navigation, or
( 2 ) The obstruction poses an immediate threat to life, property, or a structure that facilitates navigation.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 118 (Monday, June 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15356]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-1-001]


TransEnergie U.S. Ltd.; Notice of Filing

June 13, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 9, 2000, TransEnergie U.S. Ltd. 
(TransEnergie US), tendered for filing details of its open season plans 
pursuant to the Commission's June 1, 2000, and request for waiver of 
the Commission's prior notice requirements.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 23, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15356 Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**ALLIANCE GAMING CORPORATION**

**FORM 10-Q**

 

**March 31, 2004**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AllianceGaming Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert L. Saxton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 13, 2004                      |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
|                                    |
| /s/  Robert L. Saxton                   |   |
| Robert  L. Saxton                       |
| Executive Vice President, Treasurer and |
| Chief  Financial Officer (Principal     |
| Financial  and Accounting Officer)      |

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReal-Time Multiprocessor Programming Language (RTMPL) user's manualA real-time multiprocessor programming language (RTMPL) has been developed to provide for high-order programming of real-time simulations on systems of distributed computers. RTMPL is a structured, engineering-oriented language. The RTMPL utility supports a variety of multiprocessor configurations and types by generating assembly language programs according to user-specified targeting information. Many programming functions are assumed by the utility (e.g., data transfer and scaling) to reduce the programming chore. This manual describes RTMPL from a user's viewpoint. Source generation, applications, utility operation, and utility output are detailed. An example simulation is generated to illustrate many RTMPL features.Document ID19850020298Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsArpasi, D. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1985Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2422NAS 1.60:2422E-1999Accession Number85N28610Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850020298.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 10.9


 


Fixed Asset Transfer
Contract


 


Transferor: Nanjing Culture and Artwork
Property Exchange Co., Ltd (hereinafter, “Party A”)


 


Transferee: Kashi Longrui Business Management
Services Co., Ltd (hereinafter, “Party B”)


 


Party A and Party B hereby enter into the
following agreement on transfer of Party A’s fixed assets through friendly consultations:


 


1. Party A agrees to transfer a group of
fixed assets to Party B for a price of RMB 2.04 million Yuan and Party B agrees to pay such amount to Party A in full prior to
November 30, 2018. The specific list of transferred assets and transfer prices are shown in the annex, which shall constitute integral
part of this contract and bear the same legal effect as this contract.


 


2. Both parties confirm that Party A will
transfer any and all of the aforesaid fixed assets to Party B prior to September 30, 2018. The vouchers and written descriptions
related to such assets shall be delivered by Party A along with the transfer.


 


3. Party B will become the lawful owner
of such fixed assets and has any and all rights and obligations related to the assets transferred hereunder as of the delivery
date set forth herein.


 


4. Liabilities for default: either party
shall be deemed in default if it violates any representations, warranties or undertakings made by it herein or any terms of this
agreement. The defaulting party shall pay the non-defaulting party liquidated damages in full.


 


5. Dispute resolution: Any dispute arising
hereunder shall be resolved by both parties through consultations, failing which either party has the right to submit the dispute
to court governing the place of Party A for adjudication.


 


6. This agreement will take effect upon
being signed and sealed by both parties. This agreement is made in duplicate, one copy for each party and each copy bearing the
same legal effect. Any matters not specified herein shall be resolved by both parties and incorporated into additional agreements
to be executed by both parties, which agreements shall bear the same legal effect as this agreement.


 


	Party A (sea):	Party B(seal):
	Authorized representative (signature):	Authorized representative (signature):
	Date:	Date: 


 


Annex: List of fixed assets transferred
and transfer prices
§ 174.23 Form of number. ( a ) Each number must consist of two capital letters denoting the State of the issuing authority, as specified in Appendix A of Part 173 of this chapter, followed by— ( 1 ) Not more than four numerals followed by not more than two capital letters (example: NH 1234 BD); or
( 2 ) Not more than three numerals followed by not more than three capital letters (example: WN 567 EFG).
( b ) A number suffix must not include the letters “I”, “O”, or “Q,” which may be mistaken for numerals.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of SECURED FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission(the "Report"), I, Jeffrey L. Schultz,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      April 14, 2009
              
              /s/ Jeffrey
      L. SchultzJeffrey
      L. Schultz, President and Chief Executive Officerprincipal
      executive officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23746-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

JENNYFER C. VIVAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

FARMASI US LLC,

Defendant.

______________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with 

Prejudice, ECF No. [14] (“Stipulation”), filed on February 23, 2023. The Court has carefully 

reviewed the Stipulation, the record in this case, and is otherwise fully advised. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Stipulation, ECF No. [14], is APPROVED;

2. The above-styled case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

3. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs;

4. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, all pending motions are DENIED AS

MOOT and all deadlines are TERMINATED;

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

Case 1:22-cv-23746-BB Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-23746-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on February 23, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23746-BB Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 11, 2020 No. 04 - 20 - 00244 - CR , 04 - 20 - 00245 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00246 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00247 - C R, 04 - 20 - 00248 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00249 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00250 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00251 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00252 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00253 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00254 - CR,

04 - 20 - 00255 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00256 - CR, 04 - 20 - 00257 - CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant v. David Daniel ROBLES, ET AL

Appellee s From th e County Court , Kinney County, Texas Trial Court No. 10007CR , 10164 CR, 10156CR, 10165CR, 10176CR, 10182CR, 10205CR, 10209CR, 10226CR, 10231CR, 10236CR, 10237CR, 10238CR, 10239CR

Honorable Tully Shahan , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The clerk’s r ecords in these appeals have been filed and appellant’s briefs are due September 30, 2020. On September 8, 2020, appellant filed, in each case, a motion to consolidate these appeals for the purposes of motions, orders, briefing, oral argument, decision, a nd opinion . The motion is GRANTED IN PAR T and it is ORDERED that the appeals shall be consolidated for motions, briefing, and argument purposes only. The parties shall file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one appeal, but shall include the table of cases that appears on page two of appellant’s motion to consolidate, referencing all appeal and trial court cause numbers in the style of the filing . The court will dispose of the appeals with separate judgments, opinions, and mandates except to the extent the appeals involve the same defendant .

_________________________________ Sa ndee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of September, 2020 .

____________________ _______________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 528 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 528

    To amend section 353 of the Public Health Service Act to exempt 
     physician office laboratories from the clinical laboratories 
                     requirements of that section.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

  Mr. Archer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend section 353 of the Public Health Service Act to exempt 
     physician office laboratories from the clinical laboratories 
                     requirements of that section.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act 
Amendments of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF PHYSICIAN OFFICE LABORATORIES.

    Section 353(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 263a(d)) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) as 
        paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) and by adding after paragraph (1) 
        the following:
            ``(2) Exemption of physician office laboratories.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (B), a clinical laboratory in a 
                physician's office (including an office of a group of 
                physicians) which is directed by a physician and in 
                which examinations and procedures are either performed 
                by a physician or by individuals supervised by a 
                physician solely as an adjunct to other services 
                provided by the physician's office is exempt from this 
                section.
                    ``(B) Exception.--A clinical laboratory described 
                in subparagraph (A) is not exempt from this section 
                when it performs a pap smear (Papanicolaou Smear) 
                analysis.
                    ``(C) Definition.--For purposes of subparagraph 
                (A), the term `physician' has the same meaning as is 
                prescribed for such term by section 1861(r) of the 
                Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)).'';
            (2) in paragraph (3) (as so redesignated) by striking 
        ``(3)'' and inserting ``(4)''; and
            (3) in paragraphs (4) and (5) (as so redesignated) by 
        striking ``(2)'' and inserting ``(3)''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 762.44 Receipt or recovery of original disbursement postal money order. ( a ) If the original Disbursement Postal Money Order is received or recovered by the owner after he has requested the Postal Service to stop payment on the original but before a substitute has been received, he should immediately advise the Money Order Division and hold such original Disbursement Postal Money Order until receipt of instructions with respect to its negotiability.
( b ) If the original Disbursement Postal Money Order is received by the owner after a substitute has been received by him, the original shall not be cashed, but shall be immediately forwarded to the Money Order Division. Under no circumstances shall both the original and substitute be cashed.
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)   In connection with the Annual Report of Health Enhancement Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Janet L. Crance, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     Date: April 14, 2010 /s/ Janet L. Crance Janet L. Crance Chief Accounting Officer   A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 32(b)







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Yearly Report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa B. Dickey, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Teresa B. Dickey


Teresa B. Dickey


Principal Financial Officer





March 30, 2010
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.205-3 Elementary and secondary schools.

The requirements of §§ 101-6.205-1 and 101-6.205-2 with respect to any elementary or secondary school or school system shall be deemed to be satisfied if such school or school system (a) Is subject to a final order of a court of the United States for the desegregation of such school or school system, and provides an assurance that it will comply with such order, including any future modification of such order, or (b) submits a plan for the desegregation of such school or school system which the responsible official of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare determines is adequate to accomplish the purposes of the Act and this subpart within the earliest practicable time, and provides reasonable assurance that it will carry out such plan. In any case of continuing Federal financial assistance such responsible official may reserve the right to redetermine, after such period as may be specified by him, the adequacy of the plan to accomplish the purposes of the Act and this subpart. In any case in which a final order of a court of the United States for the desegregation of such school or school system is entered after submission of such a plan, such plan shall be revised to conform to such final order, including any future modification of such order.

[38 FR 17974, July 5, 1973]