alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with the Annual Report of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William H. Wilcox, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ William H. Wilcox
#### § 101-29.202 Standard.

A *standard* is a document that establishes engineering and technical requirements for items, processes, procedures, practices, and methods that have been adopted as customary. Standards may also establish requirements for selection, application, and design criteria so as to achieve the highest practical degree of uniformity in materials or products, or interchangeability of parts used within or on those products.
#### § 962.25 Continuances and extensions.

Continuances and extensions may be granted under these rules for good cause shown.
Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.21 of Part 101-6
Editorial Note: For additional information, see related documents published at 47 FR 57369, Dec. 23, 1982, 48 FR 17101, Apr. 21, 1983, and 48 FR 29096, June 24, 1983.

§ 101-6.2108 How does the Administrator provide States an opportunity to comment on proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development? ( a ) Except in unusual circumstances, the Administrator gives State processes or directly affected State, areawide, regional and local officials and entities at least: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) 60 days from the date established by the Administrator to comment on proposed direct Federal development or Federal financial assistance.
( b ) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with GSA have been delegated.
**Exhibit
        32**
   **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
  In
        connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Alpine
        Group, Inc. (the " *Company* ")
        for
        the period ended September 30, 2005 (the " *Periodic
        Report* "),
        the
        undersigned, Steven S. Elbaum, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        and
        David A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, to the best of our knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.
  Date:
                 November 14, 2005
              
              /s/ 
                STEVEN S. ELBAUMSteven
                S. Elbaum*Chief
                Executive Officer*
  /s/ 
                DAVID A. OWENDavid
                A. Owen*Chief
                Financial Officer*
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1744

___________________________

Jerome M. Meraz

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Tony Rodgers; Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Mike

Shelite; Dustin McDaniels

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison

____________

 Submitted: December 16, 2016

Filed: December 21, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Jerome Meraz—who pleaded guilty in Arkansas in 2008 to stalking,

kidnapping, residential burglary, and misdemeanortheft—appeals fromthe judgment

of the District Court denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. 1

Following de novo review, we agree with the District Court that the petition

is time-barred. Even if we were to assume that the one-year limitations period under

28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) was tolled during the pendency of Meraz’s collateral

challenges to his criminal conviction in state court, his federal petition was still

untimely filed with no grounds for equitable tolling. See Camacho v. Hobbs, 774

F.3d 931, 934–35 (8th Cir.) (discussing the dismissal of a § 2254 petition as timebarred following an Arkansas plea proceeding), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 81 (2015);

Burns v. Prudden, 588 F.3d 1148, 1150 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review for

equitable tolling).

We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant counsel’s

request to withdraw, and we deny as moot Meraz’s pending motion.

______________________________

The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Arkansas.

-2-
#### § 102-36.25 How do we request a deviation from these requirements and who can approve it?

See §§ 102-2.60 through 102-2.110 of this chapter to request a deviation from the requirements of this part.
Corporation for National and Community Service
Board of Directors

Resolution

WHEREAS, section 193A of the National and Community Service Act of 1990
directs the Chief Executive Officer to prepare and submit to the Board of Directors a
strategic plan regarding the major functions and operations of the Corporation for
National and Community Service; and

WHEREAS, section 192A of the National and Community Service Act of 1990
directs the Board of Directors to review and approve the agency’s strategic plan; and

WHEREAS, the Government Performance and Results Act requires Federal
agencies to submit to the Office of Management and Budget and to the Congress a
strategic plan for program activities, and

WHEREAS, the Corporation for National and Community Service has
undertaken a comprehensive assessment of agency goals and commitments, including
through wide-ranging consultations with Congress, grantees, and other stakeholders and
interested parties;

BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors approves the strategic plan
prepared by the Chief Executive Officer for consideration at the Board of Directors’
meeting on February 8, 2011, and directs the Chief Executive Officer to submit the
strategic plan, including non-substantive editorial and formatting changes, to the Office
of Management and Budget and to the Congress, and to disseminate the approved plan
throughout the agency and among stakeholders and other interested persons.

Approved by voice vote, February 8, 2011

Resolution 2011-2
###### Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-6.211-1 General.

If there appears to be a failure or threatened failure to comply with this subpart 101-6.2, and if the noncompliance or threatened noncompliance cannot be corrected by informal means, compliance with this subpart may be effected by the suspension or termination of or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance or by any other means authorized by law. Such other means may include, but are not limited to, (a) a reference to the Department of Justice with a recommendation that appropriate proceedings be brought to enforce any rights of the United States under any law of the United States (including other titles of the Act), or any assurance or other contractual undertaking, and (b) any applicable proceeding under State or local law.
#### § 80.125 Marblehead Neck, MA to Nahant, MA.

The 72 COLREGS apply on the harbors, bays, and inlets on the east coast of Massachusetts from Marblehead Neck to the easternmost tower at Nahant, charted in approximate position latitude 42°25.4′ N., longitude 70°54.6′ W.

[CGD 79-066, 45 FR 15176, Mar. 10, 1980. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SCHEDULE AND CONSENT

The Board of Directors
United Surgical Partners International, Inc.:

The audits referred to in our report dated February 18, 2004, included the
related consolidated financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2003 and
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003 included
in this Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the consolidated financial statement schedule base on our audits. In
our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

Our report refers to a change in the accounting for goodwill and intangible
assets with the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" in 2002.

We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" in the Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-64926) on
Form S-8 of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. of our report with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of United Surgical Partners
International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss),
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 2003 and the related consolidated financial statement
schedule.


/s/ KPMG LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2004
#### § 101-27.206-2 Identification and shipping requirements.

Manufacturers shall, whenever practicable, be required to mark the unit or container with the month and year of manufacture or production and the batch number on all shelf-life items (60 months or less) procured from other than GSA sources. Whenever practical, the supplier shall be required to ship or deliver material within a given number of months from the date of manufacture or production. These “age on delivery” requirements should not be imposed in such a manner as to unduly restrict competition at any trade level. The following guidelines are suggested as appropriate for most shelf-life items:

| Shelf-life period | Age on delivery |
| --- | --- |
| 25 mos. or more | 6 mos. |
| 19 to 24 mos | 4 mos. |
| 13 to 18 mos | 3 mos. |
| 7 to 12 mos | 2 mos. |
| 6 mos. or less | 1 mo. or less. |

[40 FR 59595, Dec. 29, 1975]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-20-0000734

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

RACHEL PALMIR SHORT, Petitioner-Appellee, v.

KELLY TYLER SHORT, Respondent-Appellee, and

DAN O'PHELAN, Real Party in Interest-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

(FC-DA NO. 20-1-0451)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) On November 19, 2020, self-represented Real Party

in Interest-Appellant Dan O'Phelan (O'Phelan) conventionally

filed the notice of appeal in the underlying case, FC-DA No. 20-

1-0451, without the fees required by Hawai#i Rules of Appellate

Procedure (HRAP) Rule 3(a);

(2) On November 25, 2020, the family court clerk

electronically filed the notice of appeal to create this appeal

in CAAP-20-0000734, and notified O'Phelan to pay the filing fees

or request a fee waiver on or before December 4, 2020, or the

appeal could be dismissed;

(3) On January 19, 2021, the appellate clerk notified

O'Phelan to pay the filing fees or file a motion for leave to

proceed on appeal in forma pauperis on or before January 29,

2021, or the appeal could be dismissed;

(4) On February 8, 2021, the appellate clerk entered a

default of the record on appeal, informing O'Phelan that the time

to docket the appeal expired on January 19, 2021, he had not paid

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-20-0000734

21-APR-2021

09:08 AM

Dkt. 9 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

the filing fees or obtained an order allowing him to proceed on

appeal in forma pauperis, the matter would be brought to the

court's attention on February 18, 2021, for action that may

include dismissal of the appeal, and he could seek relief from

default by motion;

(5) O'Phelan took no further action in the appeal; and

(6) An appeal may be dismissed where the record on

appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay 

the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to

proceed in forma pauperis. HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 21, 2021.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

2
#### § 963.19 Appeal.

Either party may file exceptions in a brief on appeal to the Judicial Officer within 15 days after receipt of the initial or tentative decision unless additional time is granted. A reply brief may be filed within 15 days after the receipt of the appeal brief by the opposing party. The Judicial Officer has all powers of a presiding officer and is authorized to decide all issues de novo.
PLAINTIFF’S COMPOSITE EXHIBIT B

Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 5 of 5
#### § 101-28.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policy and procedures for the economical and efficient management of warehousing and related activities by executive agencies.

[29 FR 15998, Dec. 1, 1964]
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Velvet M Benami) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Velvet M Benami.

Dated this 28th day of August 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 197 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 118 (Monday, June 19, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 38010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15444]

[[Page 38010]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

E-Pawn.com, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

June 14, 2000.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
E-Pawn.com, Inc. (``E-Pawn'') because of questions regarding the 
accuracy of assertions by E-Pawn, and by others, in documents sent to 
and statements made to market makers of the stock of E-Pawn, other 
broker-dealers, and to investors concerning, among other things, the 
identity of the persons in control of the operations and management of 
the company. In addition, recent market activity in E-Pawn securities 
may be the result of manipulative conduct or other illegal activity.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed company is 
suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, June 14, 2000 through 
11:59 p.m. EDT, on June 27, 2000.

    By the Commission.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15444 Filed 6-14-00; 5:08 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
```
§ 89.9 Certificate of Alternative Compliance: Contents. The Chief of the Prevention Division issues the Certificate of Alternative Compliance to the vessel based on a determination that it cannot comply fully with Inland Rules light, shape, and sound signal provisions without interference with its special function. This Certificate includes: ( a ) Identification of the vessel as supplied in the application under § 89.5(a)(2);
( b ) The provision of the Inland Rules for which the Certificate authorizes alternative compliance;
( c ) A certification that the vessel is unable to comply fully with the Inland Rules light, shape, and sound signal requirements without interference with its special function;
( d ) A statement of why full compliance would interfere with the special function of the vessel;
( e ) The required alternative installation;
( f ) A statement that the required alternative installation is in the closest possible compliance with the Inland Rules without interfering with the special function of the vessel;
( g ) The date of issuance;
( h ) A statement that the Certificate of Alternative Compliance terminates when the vessel ceases to be usually engaged in the operation for which the certificate is issued.
[CGD 80-157, 47 FR 13801, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended by USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30878, June 28, 2019]
#### § 102-2.55 How do I number my agency's supplementing regulations?

Since there is no corresponding FMR material, number the supplementing material “601” or higher. For example, your agency's supplementing regulations governing special services to states might start with § 130-601.5.
9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 190-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/22/2022 Page
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-53507, 333-95577, 333-90606, 333-130020, 333-144770 and 333-146234) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-90035 333-36359, 333-109932 and 333-131967) of Silverstar Holdings, Ltd (formerly Leisureplanet Holdings, Ltd) of our report dated October 14, 2008        (which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern), relating to the consolidated financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ RACHLIN LLP

 

Miami, Florida        October 14, 2008
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Sento Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick F. O’ Neal,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Patrick F. O’ Neal |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
| Patrick  F. O’ Neal     |
| Chief  Executive Officer     |
| February  12, 2003           |

 

----
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT D e c e m be r 14, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O RT H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 14042 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C. Do c k e tNo . 0 3 - 1 4 2 0 6 - CV- DLG W I L L I A M D . B R O W N , P la in tif f - A p p e llan t, v ersu s G E O R G E T H O M P S O N , in h is in d iv idu a l c ap a c ity , B I L L Y E L L E R B E E , in h is in d iv idu a l c ap a c ity , J E S S E J E N K I N S , in h is in d iv idu a l c ap a c ity , F R A N K P R E S C O T T , in h is in d iv idu a l c ap a c ity , D R . C U R T I S B O E H M E R , in h is in d iv idu a l c ap a c ity , e t a l., D e f e n d an ts - A p p e lle e s .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( D e c e m be r14, 2005)2

B efo re M A R C U S , W IL S O N an dP R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E RC U R I A M: W i l l i a m D . B r ow n, aF l or i dapr i s one r , appe a l s the di s m i s s a l of hi s c om pl a i nt for f ai l ure t o st at e acl ai m . B ec ause B row n’ s c om pl ai ntst at es a c l ai m for a v io la tio n o f

th e p r o h ib itio n a g a in s t c ru e l an du n u s u a l p u n is h m e n t u n d e rth e E ig h th an dF o u rte e n th A m e n d m e n ts , w e r e v e r s e . “A c o m p la in t s h o u ldn o t b e d is m is s e df o rf a ilu r e to s ta te ac la im u n le s s it ap p e ar s b e y o n dd o ub t th a t P la in tif f c an p r o v e n o s e t o f

f a c ts th a t w o u lde n title h im to r e lie f .” O m are x r e l. C an n o n v . L in d s e y , 3 3 4 F .3 d1 2 4 6 , 1 2 4 7 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . B row n’ s c om pl ai ntal l eges thatse vera l offi ce rs on the st af f of the O keec ho bee C orre ct i on alInst i tut i on , w here B row n w as i ncar ce rat ed, used exces si ve force a ga i ns thi m w i th m a l i c i ous and s a di s t i c i nt e ntt o harm hi m . B r ow n a l l e ge s tha tthe o ffi cers rep eat ed l y stu n n edB ro w n w i th a stu n g u n t o p ro dh i m t o o b ey o rd ers, a lth o u g h th e o f

f ic e r s kn e w th a t B r o w n w a s u n ab le to c o m p lyw ith th e iro r d e r s . B ec ause “ un der the E i gh th A m endm ent , forc e i s dee m ed l egi t i m at e i n a cust od i al se tt i ng [onl y] as l on g as i ti s app l i ed i n a go od fa i th eff ortt o m ai nt ai n o r r es t ore di s c i pl i ne [ and not ] m a l i c i ous l yand s a di s t i c a l l yt o c aus e harm [ , ] ” S kr i t c h v. T hornt on, 280 F . 3d 1295, 1300 ( 11th C i r . 2002) ( i nt e rna l quot a t i on m arks and ci t at i o n s o m i tt ed ), B ro w n ’ s al l eg at i o n s o f m al i ci o u s u se o f ex cessi v e fo rce ag ai n st3

h im ar e s u f

f ic ie n t to s ta te ac la im . T h e d i sm i ssal o f B ro w n ’ s co m p l ai n tfo r fai l u re t o st at e a cl ai m i s RE V E RS E D.