alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81646-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

KAYLA RICHMOND,

Plaintiff,

v.

EXCLUSIVE JETS, LLC, 

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION [ECF No. 50]

AND ENTERING AMENDED1 ORDER SCHEDULING MEDIATION

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Motion to Reschedule 

Mediation [ECF No. 50], filed on June 8, 2023. Upon review, the Joint Motion [ECF No. 50] is 

GRANTED as follows. Mediation in this case shall be held before Cathleen Scott on July 19, 

2023, 11:00 A.M., at 250 South Central Boulevard, Suite 104-A, Jupiter, Florida 33458. The 

parties are reminded that a report of their mediation must be filed within five (5) days of mediation. 

A mediation report filed by the mediator is insufficient to comply with this Order. The mediation 

report shall indicate when and where the mediation was conducted; the name of the 

mediator; who attended the mediation; whether the case settled (in full or in part); whether 

it was adjourned; or whether the mediator declared an impasse. No changes to any aspect 

of this Order may be made absent a properly filed motion for such relief and Court approval.

1 This Order supersedes the Court’s prior Order Granting Motion to Reschedule Mediation

[ECF No. 29]. 

Case 9:22-cv-81646-AMC Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 1 of 2
 CASE NO. 22-81646-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 9th day of June 2023.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81646-AMC Document 55 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2023 Page 2 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice)

Stephen Neal Zack

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 58-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 2 of 2
September 17, 2015

Mr. Dennis D. Pinciaro

Sedona Drone

PO Box 21063

Sedona AZ 86341

Dear Mr. Pinciaro :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151 (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1 ), 91.409 (a)(1) and

(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b), of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains

why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your June 19, 2015

, exemption request on behalf of Sedona Drone filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2571 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additio nal information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 1, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10284 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MALABA G. MULUMBA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-250-ALL-P

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Malaba G. Mulumba appeals his jury conviction and sentence for making a false claim of United States citizenship in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911. Mulumba does not appeal his jury conviction for possession of a firearm by an illegal alien in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2), and, thus, this conviction is not affected by the disposition of this appeal.No. 05-10284 -2- Mulumba contends that the Government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he represented himself to be a United States citizen. Because Mulumba did not move for a judgment of acquittal in the district court, this court’s review of the sufficiency of the evidence “is limited to determining whether there was a manifest miscarriage of justice, that is, whether the record is devoid of evidence pointing to guilt.” United States v. Delgado , 256 F.3d 264, 274 (5th Cir. 2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). A conviction for making a false claim of United States citizenship requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant “falsely and willfully represent[ed] himself to be a citizen of the United States.” 18 U.S.C. § 911. The sole evidence presented by the Government to establish a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911 was an I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification Form wherein Mulumba checked a box certifying that he was “[a] citizen or national of the United States.” (emphasis added). Because 18 U.S.C. § 911 criminalizes only false representations of United States citizenship and a person can be a national of the United States and yet not a citizen, the record is devoid of evidence that Mulumba falsely represented himself to be a citizen of the United States. Therefore, Mulumba’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 911 is REVERSED. Further, because Mulumba’s 18 U.S.C. § 911 conviction affected the sentence imposed in connection with his 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5) conviction, his sentence is VACATED andNo. 05-10284 -3- the case is REMANDED for resentencing on the remaining count of conviction. 18 U.S.C. § 911 CONVICTION REVERSED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING ON THE REMAINING COUNT OF CONVICTION
Exhibit 31.2

CFO CERTIFICATION

I, Derek J. Kerr, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Airlines Group Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: July 25, 2016



/s/ Derek J. KerrName:

Derek J. KerrTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of Form 10-Q dated March 31,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             103
<SECURITIES>                                        64
<RECEIVABLES>                                      168
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17
<INVENTORY>                                         70
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   412
<PP&E>                                             573
<DEPRECIATION>                                     154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              100
<BONDS>                                            945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,853
<SALES>                                            109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   201
<CGS>                                               35
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       80
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    72
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     40
<INCOME-TAX>                                        12
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 28
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        28
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5609 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5609

To ensure the availability of funds for ergonomic protection standards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 31, 2000

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ensure the availability of funds for ergonomic protection standards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ERGONOMIC PROTECTION STANDARDS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, up to $50,000,000 of 
the amounts otherwise appropriated to the Occupational Safety and 
Health Administration for fiscal year 2001 shall be available for the 
promulgation, issuance, implementation, administration, and enforcement 
of proposed, temporary, and final standards on ergonomic protection.
                                 <all>
```
### Geologic framework and stratigraphy of Cretaceous and Tertiary rocks of the Southern Ute Indian Reservation, southwestern Colorado

By: W. M. AubreyC. M. MolenaarJ. K. Baird

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1505BC

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Pages:                               - **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
  - **National Geologic Map Database Index Page** 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Jeffrey E. Marcus, Esq., of Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro LLP, hereby enters his 

appearance as counsel on behalf of Solomid Corporation in the above-captioned matter and 

respectfully requests that copies of all future pleadings, orders, and other papers be provided to the 

undersigned.

Date: June 6, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jeffrey E. Marcus

Jeffrey E. Marcus

Florida Bar No. 310890

MARCUS NEIMAN RASHBAUM & 

PINEIRO LLP 

2 S. Biscayne Blvd. Ste. 2530

Miami, FL 33131

Telephone: (305) 400-4260

jmarcus@mnrlawfirm.com 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 220 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 6, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Appearance was served via CM/ECF on all counsel or parties of record on the Service List.

By: /s/ Jeffrey E. Marcus

Jeffrey E. Marcus

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 220 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-23681-RNS Document 1-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-23681-RNS Document 1-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 101-30.701-4 Standardization relationship.

*Standardization relationship* means the relationship between the replaced item and the replacement item. The replaced item will contain an item standardization code designating the item as not authorized for procurement and therefore must have a replacement item. The relationship of the two items is displayed within the item reduction study by item standardization codes and, upon approval of the study, in the Federal catalog system data base at the Defense Logistics Services Center (DLSC).
**EXHIBIT11.1**

 

**DUKE REALTYLIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**EARNINGS TOFIXED CHARGES CALCULATION**

**(in thousands)**

 
| ** **                                                                                                     |       | **DECEMBER 31,  2004** |       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|
| Net income from  continuing operations, less preferred distributions                                           |       | $                      | 142,851    |   |
| Preferred  distributions                                                                                       |       | 33,777                 |       |
| Earnings from  sale of land and ownership interests in unconsolidated companies, net of  impairment adjustment |       | (10,202                | )          |
| Interest expense                                                                                               |       | 135,130                |       |
| Earnings before  fixed charges                                                                                 |       | $                      | 301,556    |   |
|                                                                                                           |       |                   |       |
| Interest expense                                                                                               |       | $                      | 135,130    |   |
| Interest costs  capitalized                                                                                    |       | 5,961                  |       |
| Total fixed  charges                                                                                           |       | 141,091                |       |
|                                                                                                           |       |                   |       |
| Preferred  distributions                                                                                       |       | 33,777                 |       |
| Total fixed charges and preferred unit distributions                                                           |       | $                      | 174,868    |   |
|                                                                                                           |       |                   |       |
| **Ratio  of earnings to fixed charges**                                                                        | ** ** | **2.14**               | ** ** |
|                                                                                                           |       |                   |       |
| **Ratio  of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred unit distributions**                              | ** ** | **1.72**               | ** ** |

 

----
§ 101-25.302 Office furniture, furnishings, and equipment. ( a ) Each executive agency shall establish criteria for the use of office furniture, furnishings, and equipment. Such criteria shall be in consonance with the provisions of § 101-25.104 pertaining to office furniture and office machines and shall be limited to the minimum essential requirements as established by the agency head for authorized functions and programs which will, beyond a reasonable doubt, be in operation within the following 6 months.
( b ) In developing such criteria, a distinction shall be made between the requirements of organizational elements concerned with purely administrative functions, and those of a technical, scientific, or specialized nature.
( c ) Items of office equipment, used only occasionally, should be pooled within an agency and made available to activities of the agency when and as necessary.
[29 FR 15993, Dec. 1, 1964, as amended at 42 FR 1031, Jan. 5, 1977]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 of the
Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Deborah H. MerrillDeborah H. MerrillVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
§ 102-36.215 How do we report excess personal property? Report excess personal property as follows: ( a ) Electronically submit the data elements required on the Standard Form 120 (SF 120), Report of Excess Personal Property, in a format specified and approved by GSA; or
( b ) Submit a paper SF 120 to the regional GSA Personal Property Management office.
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Robert Cruceta) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Robert Cruceta.

Dated this 1st day of August 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 180 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2023 Page 1 of 1