alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,602
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (366)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,756
<PP&E>                                          15,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,737
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,657)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,876
<SALES>                                         50,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,624
<CGS>                                           37,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (175)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (287)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (287)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
#### Farmers Loan & Trust Company v. M. B. Davis et al.

Filed October 2, 1894.

No. 5802.

Beview: Failure to File Motion for New Trial. Where it is sought by a petition in error to have the proceedings of a district court, during the trial of an equity case, reviewed by th« supreme court, there must have been a motion for hew trial filed and presented to the trial court, as in an action at law.

Error from the district court of Cedar county. Tried below before Norris, J.

*M. J. Sweeley,*for plaintiff in error.

*Davis, Gantt & Briggs, contra.*

*47Harrison, J.

The Farmers Loan & Trust Company, incorporated under the laws of the state of Iowa, commenced an action in the district court of Cedar county to foreclose. tax liens against certain real estate situate in Cedar county and the property of one of the defendants, M. B. Davis. The cause was tried to the court and judgment rendered for the defendant, to revise which the company prosecuted a petition in error to this court.

An examination of the record discloses the fact that there was no motion for a new trial filed in the trial court. It is a well established rule of this court that where it is sought by a petition in error to have the proceedings of a trial court, during the trial of an equity case, reviewed in the supreme court, there must have been a motion for new trial filed and presented to the trial court, as in an action at law. (See *Gray v. Disbrow,*36 Neb., 857; *Carlow v. Aultman,*28 Neb., 672.) This ease falls within the above rule, and therefore we cannot review the proceedings of the lower court. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5540

To extend for 11 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of

title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To extend for 11 additional months the period for which

chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

4 Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law

5 105–277, as amended by Public Law 106–5 and Public

6 Law 106–70, is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2000’’ each place it ap8 pears and inserting ‘‘June 1, 2001’’; and

9 (2) in subsection (a)—
2

•HR 5540 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘September 30, 1999’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘June 30, 2000’’; and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘October 1, 1999’’ and in4 serting ‘‘July 1, 2000’’.

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect

7 on July 1, 2000.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 101-8

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-8.312 Procedures.

The procedural provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are adopted and stated in §§ 101-6.205-101-6.215 and apply to this subpart. (Sec. 205(c), 63 Stat. 390; 40 U.S.C. 486(c).)
#### § 2.1 Office of the Board of Governors.

There shall be located in Washington, DC, an Office of the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service. It shall be the function of this Office, led by the Secretary of the Board, to provide staff support for the Board, as directed by the Chairman of the Board, to enable the Board to carry out effectively its duties and responsibilities.

[86 FR 10012, Feb. 18, 2021]
) 9/T1

AmeriCorps

Unite in Service. Never Forget.

o

AmeriCorps A

Unite in Service. Never Forget.
§ 95.045 General operating rules for vessels inspected, or subject to inspection, under Chapter 33 of Title 46 United States Code. While on board a vessel inspected, or subject to inspection, under Chapter 33 of Title 46 United States Code, a crewmember (including an officer), pilot, or watchstander not a regular member of the crew: ( a ) Shall not perform or attempt to perform any scheduled duties within four hours of consuming any alcohol;
( b ) Shall not be intoxicated at any time;
( c ) Shall not consume any intoxicant while on watch or duty; and
( d ) May consume a legal non-prescription or prescription drug provided the drug does not cause the individual to be intoxicated.
[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47532, Dec. 14, 1987, as amended at USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11211, Mar. 16, 2009]
EXHIBIT
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 of AMERCO
      (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      February 6, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Jason A. Berg, Chief Accounting Officer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      that:


(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






AMERCO,


a
      Nevada
      corporation




/s/
      Jason A. Berg


Jason
      A.
      Berg


Chief
      Accounting Officer


Date:
      February 6, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5582 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5582

 To designate a portion of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area in Minnesota 
    as the ``Bruce F. Vento Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area 
                             Wilderness''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 2000

  Mr. Oberstar (for himself, Mr. Sabo, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. 
   Ramstad, Mr. Minge, Mr. Luther, and Mr. Gutknecht) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate a portion of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area in Minnesota 
    as the ``Bruce F. Vento Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area 
                             Wilderness''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. BRUCE F. VENTO UNIT OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE AREA 
              WILDERNESS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Designation.--The portion of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area 
Wilderness, Minnesota, situated north and east of the Gunflint Corridor 
and that is bounded by the United States border with Canada to the 
north shall be known and designated as the ``Bruce F. Vento Unit of the 
Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness''.
    (b) Legal Reference.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the area 
referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Bruce F. Vento Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Subpart 101-6.2 of Part 101-6
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101-6 appear at 68 FR 51373, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 101-6.210-4 Resolution of matters. ( a ) If an investigation pursuant to § 101-6.210-3 indicates a failure to comply with this subpart 101-6.2, the responsible GSA official or his designee will so inform the recipient and the matter will be resolved by informal means whenever possible. If it has been determined that the matter cannot be resolved by informal means, action will be taken as provided for in § 101-6.211.
( b ) If an investigation does not warrant action pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section the responsible GSA official or his designee will so inform the recipient and the complainant, if any, in writing.
#### § 401.45 Emergency procedure.

When the speed of a vessel entering a lock chamber has to be checked, the master shall take all necessary precautions to stop the vessel in order to avoid contact with lock structures. At no time shall the vessel deploy its anchors to stop the vessel when entering a lock chamber.

[81 FR 13746, Mar. 15, 2016]
§ 102-118.260 Must my agency send all quotations, tenders, or contracts with a TSP to GSA? ( a ) Yes, your agency must send copies of each quotation, tender, or contract of special rates, fares, charges, or concessions with TSPs including those authorized by 49 U.S.C. 10721 and 13712, upon execution to—*audit.policy@gsa.gov* or General Services Administration, Office of Travel, Employee Relocation and Transportation, Attn: Transportation Audits Division, 1800 F Street NW, 3rd Floor, Mail Hub 3400, Washington, DC 20405.
( b ) Tenders must be submitted electronically, following the instructions provided by the requesting agency. The following information must be submitted with the tender: ( 1 ) Issuing TSP, Bureau, Agency or Conference.
( 2 ) Tender number.
( 3 ) Standard Carrier Alpha Code (SCAC).
( 4 ) TSP Tax Identification Number (TIN).
( 5 ) Issue date.
( 6 ) Effective date.
( 7 ) Expiration date.
( 8 ) Origin and destination.
( 9 ) Freight Classification and/or commodity description (including origin and destination).
( 10 ) Rate or charge for line haul rates.
( 11 ) Minimum weights.
( 12 ) Route(s).
( 13 ) Accessorial services description(s) with rate or charge and governing publication.
( 14 ) TSP operating authority.
( c ) The TSP must include a statement that the TSP will adhere and agree to the following general terms and conditions. The services provided in this tender will be performed in accordance with applicable Federal, State and municipal laws and regulations, including Federal Management Regulation parts 102-117 and 102-118 (41 CFR parts 102-117 and 102-118), and the TSP(s) hold(s) the required operating authority to transport the commodity from, to, or between the places specified in the authorized certificates, permits or temporary operating authorities.
[69 FR 57619, Sept. 24, 2004, as amended at 74 FR 30475, June 26, 2009; 87 FR 32325, May 31, 2022]
###### Editorial Note on Part 101-8

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 101-8 appear at 68 FR 51374, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 101-8.302 General prohibitions.

No qualified handicapped persons shall, on the basis of handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity that receives Federal assistance from GSA.
### Systematic paleontology of Quaternary ostracode assemblages from the Gulf of Alaska; Part 3, Family Cytheruridae

By: E. M. Brouwers

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1544

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 485 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 485

  To amend part B of title III of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to 
repeal the specific limitation on the eligibility of the University of 
the District of Columbia for assistance for Historically Black Colleges 
                           and Universities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend part B of title III of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to 
repeal the specific limitation on the eligibility of the University of 
the District of Columbia for assistance for Historically Black Colleges 
                           and Universities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``University of the District of 
Columbia Equal Educational Status Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF RESTRICTION ON ELIGIBILITY OF UNIVERSITY OF THE 
              DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR ASSISTANCE FOR HISTORICALLY 
              BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 324(g) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1063(g)) is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``Institutions'' and 
        inserting ``Institution'';
            (2) by striking ``or the University of the District of 
        Columbia'';
            (3) by striking ``or by the University of the District of 
        Columbia'' and all that follows through ``(87 Stat. 774)''; and
            (4) by striking ``and the University of the District of 
        Columbia, as the case may be,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to fiscal year 2000 and each succeeding fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF CAPROCK CANYON  INVESTMENTS,  INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND
THE RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
-  2  -

July  1,  2002

December  30,  2001
Peoplesway.Com,  Inc.
Matthew  M.  Monroe
2969  Interstate  Street
Charlotte,  NC  28208


Dear Matthew M. Monroe:
This  letter  of  understanding  is  to  confirm  our  discussions regarding the
agreement  between  DRM,  Inc.  (DRM)  and subsidiaries (RMC Group, Inc. and RMC
Group  Canada,  Ltd.)  and  Peoplesway.Com,  Inc.  (Peoplesway).

DRM  assigns  Peoplesway  as  its  exclusive worldwide sales and marketing agent
effective  January  1, 2002.  We feel this agreement will be mutually beneficial
to  DRM  and  Peoplesway  to  increase  the  DRM  product line's presence in the
marketplace  and  sales  and  revenues  for  Peoplesway.

Peoplesway  agrees  to  make its best effort to market the DRM product lines and
other  product lines that DRM may elect to offer through alliances and affiliate
programs.  Peoplesway  will  also  market  and maintain the sites of site owners
within  the  multi-eNetwork  on  its  server.  This  will  include acquiring all
necessary equipment, programming and staff to necessary to provide this service.
In  addition to products, DRM will also provide warehouse space (aprox. 1900 sq.
ft.),  office  space  (approx.  2600  sq.  ft.), customer service, warehouse and
management  personnel,  supplies  and  other  items  necessary  to  promote  the
products.

Each  subsidiary  of  DRM  will  also  invoice  Peoplesway  for all services and
personnel  provided on their behalf at actual costs, plus a management fee of 3%
of  Product  Volume.

The  product  cost will be invoiced to Peoplesway at cost plus 10%.  The invoice
will  be  submitted  based  on  the  cost  of  the  product  sold  each  month.
This  agreement  will  be  reviewed  every  12  months  and  revised  as needed.

We  are  excited  about the opportunity for growth by both our companies through
our  internet  sales  and  marketing agreement.  If we can be of any assistance,
please  do  not  hesitate  to  contact  us.
Regards,

R.  H.  Smtih
Vice  President  /  Secretary

Agreed  to  by  Matthew  M.  Monroe  on  behalf  of  Peoplesway.Com,  Inc.

_______________________          ___________
Matthew  M.  Monroe               Date
#### § 102-37.440 May donees acquire property for exchange?

No, a donee may not acquire property with the intent to sell or trade it for other assets.
§ 102-118.275 What must my agency consider when developing a transportation prepayment audit program? ( a ) Your agency's transportation prepayment audit program must consider all of the methods that your agency uses to order and pay for passenger, household goods, and freight transportation to include Government contractor-issued charge cards (see § 102-118.35 for definition Government contractor-issued charge cards).
( b ) Each method of ordering transportation and transportation services for passenger, household goods, and freight transportation may require a different kind of prepayment audit process. The manner in which your agency orders or procures transportation services determines how and by whom the bill for those services will be presented. Your agency should ensure that each TSP bill or employee travel voucher contains enough information for the prepayment audit to determine which contract or rate tender is used and that the type and quantity of any additional services are clearly delineated.
( c ) The prepayment audit cannot be conducted by the same firm providing the transportation services for the agency. If a move manager is being utilized, the move manager may not have any affiliation with or financial interest in the transportation company providing the transportation services for which the prepayment audit is being conducted. Contracts with charge card companies that provide prepayment audit services are a valid option. The agency can choose to— ( 1 ) Create an internal prepayment audit program;
( 2 ) Contract directly with a prepayment audit service provider;
( 3 ) Use the services of a prepayment audit contractor under GSA's multiple award schedule covering audit services, including transportation prepayment audit services (541211 Auditing Services); or
( 4 ) Use a third-party payment system (TPPS) or charge card company that includes prepayment audit functions.
( d ) An appeals process must be established for a TSP to appeal any reduction in the amount billed. It is recommended the agency establish an electronic appeal process that will direct TSP-filed appeals to an agency official for determination of the claim.
( e ) A process to ensure that all agency transportation procurement and related documents including contracts and tenders are submitted electronically to GSA Transportation Audits Division.
( f ) Use of GSA Transportation Audits Division's Prepayment Audit Program template is recommended (contact *Audit.Policy@gsa.gov* for a copy of the template). If the template is not used, provide the same information listed on the template to GSA Transportation Audits Division.
[81 FR 65300, Sept. 22, 2016, as amended at 87 FR 32325, May 31, 2022]