alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Sento Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick F. O’ Neal,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)   the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Patrick  F. O’ Neal |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
| Patrick F.  O’ Neal     |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer     |   |
| November 12,  2004           |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37535-37536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-316-000]


Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC; Notice of Tariff 
Filing

June 9, 2000.
    Take notice that on June 5, 2000, Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas 
Transmission LLC, (KMIGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1-A and Fourth Revised Volume 1-B, 
the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to the filing, to become 
effective August 1, 2000.
    KMIGT states that the proposed changes update the KMIGT tariff and 
clarify or simplify certain tariff provisions, and in some cases change 
certain tariff provisions in order to reflect evolving business 
practices in the natural gas industry and to implement simpler or more 
efficient operational requirements. Through the proposed changes KMIGT: 
Moves certain provisions from the various Rate Schedules into the 
General Terms and Conditions of the tariff; offers additional 
flexibility with regard to shipper imbalances; clarifies the 
methodology for point allocation, curtailment and scheduling of 
service; revises and clarifies the right of first refusal process; 
revises the provisions regarding capacity release; simplifies its 
methodology for billing for overruns; and makes a number of 
housekeeping changes to various tariff sheets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.2109 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not service to make 
protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies

[[Page 37536]]

of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be 
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15100 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the annual report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Donald G. Barnhart, Principal Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented andconsolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: March 28, 2008

|   | /s/ Donald G. BarnhartDonald G. BarnhartPrincipal Financial Officer |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                             18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Security  Biometrics,  Inc.
(the
"Company")  on  Form  10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the "Report"), I,
Michel  Berty,
Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that;

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

/s/  Michel  Berty
----------------------
Chief  Executive  Officer

November  14,  2003



                                       56
<PAGE>
§ 3013.15 Duties in responding to a subpoena. ( a ) A covered person responding to a subpoena to produce documents shall produce them as they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize and label them to correspond with the categories in the subpoena.
( b ) If a subpoena does not specify the form or forms for producing electronically stored information, a covered person responding to a subpoena must produce the information in a form or forms in which the covered person ordinarily maintains it or in a form or forms that are reasonably usable.
( c ) A covered person responding to a subpoena need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.
( d ) A covered person commanded to produce and permit inspection or copying of designated electronically stored information, books, papers, or documents need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless commanded to appear for deposition, hearing, or trial.
( e ) A covered person who fails or refuses to disclose or provide discovery of information on the grounds that the information is privileged or subject to protection as a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information must expressly support all such claims and shall provide a description of the nature of the information and the potential harm that is sufficient to enable the Commission to evaluate and determine the propriety of the claim.
( f ) Request for confidential treatment of information shall be made in accordance with part 3011 of this chapter.
[75 FR 22107, Apr. 27, 2010, as amended at 85 FR 9646, Feb. 19, 2020]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Census Monitoring Board

# SUMMARY:

This notice, in compliance with Pub. L. 105-119, sets forth the meeting date, time, and place for two public meetings of the U.S. Census Monitoring Board in Southern California. The agenda is to hear from community based groups regarding the operations of the census within the area. Additionally, the Board will have a general business meeting.

*Date:*                         Monday June 26, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Location:*                         Town & Gown Center, Main Campus, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA                    

*Date:*                         Tuesday, June 27, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 11 a.m.                    

*Location:*                         San Diego Association of Governments, 7th Floor, Board Room, 401 B Street, San Diego, CA.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                    Contact Clark Reid, 301-457-5080                           ( print page 37959)                        Deputy Executive Director (Congressional Members) or Robert Cunningham (Presidential Members) 301-457-9900.                

Dated: June 13, 2000.

Fred T. Asbell,

Executive Director, Congressional Members.

Mark Johnson,

Executive Director, Presidential Members.

[FR Doc. 00-15358  Filed 6-16-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-07-M
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5110 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5110

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street 
 in Riverside, California, as the ``George E. Brown, Jr. United States 
                             Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5110

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street 
 in Riverside, California, as the ``George E. Brown, Jr. United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street in 
Riverside, California, shall be known and designated as the ``George E. 
Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George E. 
Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 17, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Adam M. Moskowitz

Joseph M. Kaye

THE MOSKOWITZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

2 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 601

Coral Gables, FL 33134 

Telephone: (305) 740-1423

Service@moskowitz-law.com

David Boies

(Pro Hac Vice Application Forthcoming)

Stephen Neal Zack

Hon. Ursula Ungaro (Ret.)

BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP

333 Main Street, Armonk, NY 10504

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2800, Miami, FL 33131

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 11-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:22-cv-14322-JEM   Document 13   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2023   Page 1 of 1
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00083

- CR

Dennis Harris

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1390488D)

May 12 , 2016

Per Curiam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### Young v. Young.

(Decided October 26, 1916.)

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

Divorce — Appeal and Error — Jurisdiction—Dismissal.—Upon an appeal from a judgment awarding alimony, while payments under tbe judgment are not shown, it is apparent that appellant could not have paid within the time elapsed since the judgment was •rendered an amount sufficient to give this court jurisdiction, and the appeal must be dismissed.

WM. U. WARREN for appellant.

PRANK V. RENTON for appellee.

*754Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Dismissing appeal.

This appeal is from a judgment awarding appellee as alimony $15.00 a month from January 23, 1915. As the judgment was rendered on June 23, 1915, and superseded on July 19, 1915, when the appeal was prosecuted, it is apparent, although appellant does not show any payments under the judgment, that he could not have paid within that time an amount sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. Therefore under authority of Van Veter v. Van Meter, 168 Ky. 783, the appeal is dismissed.
#### SOPHIA A. SEARLES and another, Executors, Appellants, *v.*VOLMER R. HARVEY and others, Respondents.

*Writ de lunático inquirendo*— Inquisition—finding *in as to duration of*lunacy— *effect of.*

An inquisition taken by virtue of a writ *de lunático mquirendo,*which finds that the alleged lunatic was of unsound mind, and had been in such condition for twenty-four months, is not conclusive evidence of the incapacity of the alleged lunatic to make a will during such twenty-four months. *{Wadsioorth*v. *Sharpsteen,*8 FT. Y.,388; *Van DuesenY. Leveed,*31 id., 379; *Wolcott*v. *Adee,*3 Lans., 173.)

Appeal *from*an order *of*the surrogate of Jefferson county, refusing to admit to probate, a will purporting to be the will of Elisha Harvey, deceased.

*L. J. JDorwin,*for appellants. *Hubbard dé Walts,*for respondents.

Opinion by

Smith, J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Gilbert, JJ.

Order of surrogate affirmed, with costs of appeal.
Exhibit 31.2

               CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB

     I, Joanna Hoover, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ITIS Holdings
Inc., a Nevada Corporation;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004
-----------------------

/s/ Joanna Hoover
-----------------
Name:  Joanna Hoover
Title: Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23346-BLOOMTorres

AM CRESPI MIAMI, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

CENTURY SURETY COMPANY,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Century Surety Company’s Motion for 

Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees and Non-Taxable Costs Against the Plaintiff and Motion to 

Suspend Time Limitations of Local Rule 7.3 (“Motion”), ECF No. [50]. The Court referred the 

Motion to Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin Torres for a Report and Recommendation. See ECF 

No. [54]. On February 19, 2024, Judge Torres issued a R&R recommending that Defendant’s 

Motion be granted. Judge Torres applied the statute in effect when the Policy was issue and 

concluded that Defendant is entitled to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred from March 31, 2023, 

the date Defendant’s Offer of Judgment was served, pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 768.79. ECF No. 

[55]. The R&R advised the parties that objections to the R & R may be filed with the District 

Judge within fourteen days of receipt of a copy of the report. Id. at15. To date, neither party has 

filed objections, nor sought additional time to file objections. The Court has, nonetheless,

conducted a de novo review of the R&R and the record and is otherwise fully advised in the 

premises. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)).

Case 1:22-cv-23346-BB Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/07/2024 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-23346-BLOOM/Torres

2

Upon review, the Court finds Judge Torres’ R&R to be well reasoned and correct. The 

Court agrees with the analysis in the R&R and concludes that Defendant’s Motion must be 

granted for the reasons set forth therein.

For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The R&R, ECF No. [55], is ADOPTED; and

2. Defendant Century Surety Company’s Motion for Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees 

and Non-Taxable Costs Against the Plaintiff and Motion to Suspend Time 

Limitations of Local Rule 7.3, ECF No. [50], is GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on March 7, 2024.

________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

Counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-23346-BB Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/07/2024 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors

Zhone Technologies, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-115306 and 333-113320) and in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-155321, 333-149598, 333-141153, 333-134217, 333-132336,333-128092, 333-123369, 333-117142, 333-110713, 333-98855, 333-88732, 333-83422, 333-73352 and 333-61956) of Zhone Technologies, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Zhone Technologies,Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Zhone Technologies, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Mountain View, California 

March 16, 2009