UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-23597-RAR

NEALON LENNOX HYPOLITE, 

Petitioner, 

 

v. 

 

GARRETT RIPA, DIRECTOR OF

MIAMI ICE FIELD OFFICE, 

Respondent. 

________________________________/ 

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Respondent’s “Motion to Dismiss for Mootness 

Due to Petitioner’s Release from Custody.” See Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.”) [ECF No. 6]. 

Petitioner, a detainee in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), has filed 

a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging that he has been in custody 

since June 10, 2021, and that his detention is no longer “presumptively reasonable” as defined by

Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). See Petition (“Pet.”) [ECF No. 1] at 6. Respondent now 

argues that the Petition is moot since Petitioner was released from ICE custody on November 15, 

2022. Mot. at 1. 

Federal courts only have subject matter jurisdiction over “cases or controversies.” Spencer 

v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998) (citing U.S. CONST. art. III, § 2). If the issues presented in a suit 

“are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome” then the case 

is moot and can no longer “be characterized as an active case or controversy.” Al Najjar v. 

Ashcroft, 273 F.3d 1330, 1335–36 (11th Cir. 2001) (internal citations omitted). Respondent argues 

that this case has become moot since “there is no injury to redress because Petitioner was released 

Case 1:22-cv-23597-RAR Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

from custody.” Mot. at 2. As proof, Respondent has attached an “Order of Supervision” issued 

by ICE showing that Petitioner has been released to an address in Indiana and commanding 

Petitioner to follow certain conditions while on release. See Order of Supervision [ECF No. 6-1] 

at 1–5. 

The Court agrees with Respondent, with one small caveat. Petitioner specifically and 

exclusively challenged his detention in ICE custody under the auspices of Zadvydas. See Pet. at 6 

(“My detention is prolonged and indefinite. I have been detained post-order of removal since June 

10, 2021 . . . . I am detained well past the 90 day statutory period and well past the 6 month 

presumptively reasonable period set forth in Zadvydas v. Davis, with no foreseeable end in sight.”). 

Since Petitioner has been “released from ICE custody pending removal from the United States[,]

his petition for habeas relief under Zadvydas is moot.” Ismaila v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., No. 

09-0184, 2009 WL 1635781, at *2 (S.D. Ala. June 9, 2009) (internal quotation omitted); see also 

Djadju v. Vega, 32 F.4th 1102, 1107 (11th Cir. 2022) (“Here, Djadju has asked the federal courts 

for only one form of relief: to be immediately released from custody as a result of his ‘ongoing 

prolonged detention.’ Since Djadju already has been released from custody, his prayer for relief 

has been satisfied.”). Accordingly, Petitioner’s freedom of movement continues to be restricted 

by ICE’s Order of Supervision, meaning that this Court would still have jurisdiction to consider a 

§ 2241 petition if Petitioner challenged the individual release conditions imposed by ICE. See 

Alvarez v. Holder, 454 F. App’x 769, 773 (11th Cir. 2011). That said, since “Petitioner does not 

challenge the terms of the Order of Supervision. . . . [T]here is no relief that the Court could 

award”—and therefore, the Petition is indeed moot since Petitioner has already been granted the 

relief he requested. Hyacinthe v. McAleenan, No. 19-cv-21682, 2019 WL 3944442, at *3 (S.D. 

Fla. Aug. 21, 2019). 

Case 1:22-cv-23597-RAR Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED as moot. All pending motions are DENIED as moot

and all deadlines are TERMINATED. The Clerk is instructed to CLOSE the case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 17th day of November, 2022. 

 

 _________________________________ 

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of record 

 Nealon Lennox Hypolite 

 A# 034-340-162 

Krome Service Processing Center

Inmate Mail/Parcels

 18201 SW 12th Street 

 Miami, FL 33194 

PRO SE

 4006 South A Street 

 Richmond, IN 473741

 

1

 The ICE Order of Supervision indicates that Petitioner is now residing at this address in Indiana. See 

Order of Supervision [ECF No. 6-1] at 2. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to 

this Indiana address and the address Petitioner has on file with the Court. 

Case 1:22-cv-23597-RAR Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 3 of 3