alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPlanning fuel-conservative descents in an airline environmental using a small programmable calculator:  Algorithm development and flight test resultsA simple, airborne, flight-management descent algorithm was developed and programmed into a small programmable calculator. The algorithm may be operated in either a time mode or speed mode. The time mode was designed to aid the pilot in planning and executing a fuel-conservative descent to arrive at a metering fix at a time designated by the air traffic control system. The speed model was designed for planning fuel-conservative descents when time is not a consideration. The descent path for both modes was calculated for a constant with considerations given for the descent Mach/airspeed schedule, gross weight, wind, wind gradient, and nonstandard temperature effects. Flight tests, using the algorithm on the programmable calculator, showed that the open-loop guidance could be useful to airline flight crews for planning and executing fuel-conservative descents.Document ID19850018394Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsKnox, C. E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Vicroy, D. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Simmon, D. A.*(United Airlines Inc., Chicago, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1985Subject CategoryAircraft InstrumentationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2393NASA-TP-2393L-15844Accession Number85N26705Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-45-33Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850018394.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 959.26 Motion for reconsideration.

A party may file a motion for reconsideration of a final decision of the Postal Service within 10 days after receiving it, or within such longer period as the Judicial Officer may fix. Each motion for reconsideration shall be accompanied by a brief clearly setting forth the points of fact and of law relied upon in support of said motion.
Exhibit 32
                        American Airlines, Inc.
                             Certification
       Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                          United States Code)


Pursuant   to  section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act   of   2002
(subsections  (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63  of  title  18,
United  States  Code), each of the undersigned officers  of  American
Airlines,  Inc.,  a Delaware corporation (the Company),  does  hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  March  31,
2006  (the  Form  10-Q)  of  the  Company  fully  complies  with  the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934  and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in  all  material respects, the financial condition  and  results  of
operations of the Company.

Date:  April 20, 2006              /s/ Gerard J. Arpey
                                   Gerard J. Arpey
                                   Chairman, President and Chief
                                   Executive Officer

Date:  April 20, 2006              /s/ Thomas W. Horton
                                   Thomas W. Horton
                                   Executive Vice President and  Chief
                                   Financial Officer



The  foregoing  certification is being furnished solely  pursuant  to
section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections  (a)  and
(b)  of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and
is  not  being  filed  as  part of the Form 10-Q  or  as  a  separate
disclosure document.
§ 80.805 Rock Island, FL to Cape San Blas, FL. ( a ) A south-north line drawn from the Econfina River Light to the opposite shore.
( b ) A line drawn from Gamble Point Light to the southernmost extremity of Cabell Point.
( c ) A line drawn from St. Mark's Range Rear Light to St. Mark's Channel Light 11; thence to the southernmost extremity of Live Oak Point; thence in a straight line through Shell Point Light to the southernmost extremity of Ochlockonee Point; thence to Bald Point along longitude 84°20.5′ W.
( d ) A line drawn from the south shore of Southwest Cape at longitude 84°22.7′ W., to Dog Island Reef East Light 1; thence a straight line to the easternmost extremity of Dog Island.
( e ) A line drawn from the westernmost extremity of Dog Island to the easternmost extremity of St. George Island.
( f ) A line drawn across the seaward extremity of the St. George Island Channel Jetties.
( g ) A line drawn from the northwesternmost extremity of Sand Island to West Pass Light 7.
( h ) A line drawn from the westernmost extremity of St. Vincent Island to the southeast, highwater shoreline of Indian Peninsula at Longitude 85°13.5′ W.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, as amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7787, Mar. 6, 1986; USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35002, June 19, 2008; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39172, July 1, 2013]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.2
                            AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
          COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                 Six Months
                                Ended June 30,
                                 (Unaudited)                     Years Ended December 31,
                               ---------------        -----------------------------------------------
                               2004       2003        2003       2002       2001      2000       1999
                               ----       ----        ----       ----       ----      ----       ----

<S>                           <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Earnings:
Pretax income from
   continuing operations      $2,514     $2,093     $4,247     $3,727     $1,596     $3,908     $3,438
Interest expense                 781        824      1,617      1,846      2,888      2,952      2,178
Other adjustments                 81         84        157        174        175        163        151
                              ------     ------     ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
Total earnings (a)            $3,376     $3,001     $6,021     $5,747     $4,659     $7,023     $5,767
                              ======     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense           $  781     $  824     $1,617     $1,846     $2,888     $2,952     $2,178
   Other adjustments              72         72        140        151        170        165        152
                              ------     ------     ------     ------     ------     ------     ------
Total fixed charges (b)       $  853     $  896     $1,757     $1,997     $3,058     $3,117     $2,330
                              ======     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======     ======


Ratio of earnings
   to fixed charges (a/b)       3.96       3.35       3.43       2.88       1.52       2.25       2.48

</TABLE>


Included in interest expense in the above computation is interest expense
related to the international banking operations of American Express Company
(American Express) and Travel Related Services' cardmember lending activities,
which is netted against net investment income and cardmember lending net
finance charge revenue, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Income
of American Express.

For purposes of the "earnings" computation, other adjustments include adding the
amortization of capitalized interest, the net loss of affiliates accounted for
under the equity method whose debt is not guaranteed by American Express, the
minority interest in the earnings of majority-owned subsidiaries with fixed
charges, and the interest component of rental expense and subtracting
undistributed net income of affiliates accounted for under the equity method.

For purposes of the "fixed charges" computation, other adjustments include
capitalized interest costs and the interest component of rental expense.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23595-CIV-SCOLA

DREAMA LOVETT,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY,

Defendant(s). /

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

The Plaintiff, DREAMA LOVETT, by and through her undersigned legal counsel 

hereby stipulates and moves that this cause be dismissed, including all claims that were or could 

have been raised in this action, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorney fees and 

costs. 

Dated: January 16, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

___/s/ Alexander Palamara _______

ALEXANDER PALAMARA, ESQ.

Florida Bar No.: 0037170

ATTORNEYS DELL & SCHAEFER 

CHARTERED

Attorneys for Plaintiff

2625 Weston Road

Weston, FL 33331

(954) 620-8300

Email: Alex@diattorney.com

Case 1:22-cv-23595-RNS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/16/2023 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by Notices of 

Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on January 16, 2023, on all counsel or parties of record on 

the Service List below. 

 /s/ Alexander Palamara

Alexander Palamara, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 0037170 

ATTORNEYS DELL & SCHAEFER, CHARTERED

SERVICE LIST

Lee W. Marcus, Esq.

Marcus & Myers PA

6150 Metrowest Boulevard

Suite 208

Orlando, FL 32835

Tel: (407) 447-2550 

Fax: (407) 447-2551 

Email: lmarcus@marcusmyerslaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 

Case 1:22-cv-23595-RNS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/16/2023 Page 2 of 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5159

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for

the conversion of cooperative housing corporations into condominiums.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 12, 2000

Mrs. MINK OF HAWAII introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

tax relief for the conversion of cooperative housing corporations into condominiums.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NONRECOGNITION OF GAIN OR LOSS ON DIS4 TRIBUTIONS BY COOPERATIVE HOUSING

5 CORPORATIONS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 216(e) of the Internal

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to distributions by cooper8 ative housing corporations) is amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(e) DISTRIBUTIONS BY COOPERATIVE HOUSING

10 CORPORATIONS.—
2

•HR 5159 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in

2 regulations—

3 ‘‘(A) no gain or loss shall be recognized to

4 a cooperative housing corporation on the dis5 tribution by such corporation of a dwelling unit

6 to a stockholder in such corporation if such dis7 tribution is in exchange for the stockholder’s

8 stock in such corporation, and

9 ‘‘(B) no gain or loss shall be recognized to

10 a stockholder of such corporation on the trans11 fer of such stockholder’s stock in an exchange

12 described in subparagraph (A).

13 ‘‘(2) BASIS.—The basis of a dwelling unit ac14 quired in a distribution to which paragraph (1) ap15 plies shall be the same as the basis of the stock in

16 the cooperative housing corporation for which it is

17 exchanged, decreased in the amount of any money

18 received by the taxpayer in such exchange.’’.

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

20 this section shall apply to distributions after the date of

21 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 550 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 550

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that persons who have 
 been convicted of a capital crime may not be awarded the Purple Heart.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

 Mr. McKeon (for himself and Mr. Stump) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that persons who have 
 been convicted of a capital crime may not be awarded the Purple Heart.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON AWARD OF PURPLE HEART TO PERSONS CONVICTED OF 
              CAPITAL CRIMES.

    (a) In General.--(1) Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1131. Persons convicted of capital crimes: prohibition of award 
              of Purple Heart
    ``(a) Disqualification.--A person who has been convicted of a 
capital offense for which the person was sentenced to death or life 
imprisonment without parole may not be awarded the Purple Heart.
    ``(b) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) The term `capital offense' means an offense under 
        Federal or State law for which the death penalty may be 
        imposed.
            ``(2) The term `State' includes the District of Columbia 
        and any commonwealth or territory of the United States.''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``1131. Persons convicted of capital crimes: prohibition of award of 
                            Purple Heart.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 1131 of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to the award of 
the Purple Heart after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 101-26.802 Exclusions.

The provisions of this regulation are not applicable to shipments and billings related to the stockpile of strategic and critical materials or excess or surplus property; or to billings for services, space, communications, and printing.
#### § 775.1 Purpose.

These procedures implement the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations (40 CFR part 1500) issued by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).

[63 FR 45719, Aug. 27, 1998]
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1 
RATE APPLICABLE TO
PARTICIPATING DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS UNDER THE
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
Effective for the 2020 plan year, the Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee approved an applicable interest rate of 9.66% for the Directors and Executives Deferred Compensation Plan. That rate decreased from the 10.63% rate in effect for 2019, and applies prospectively to certain participants, including all participants who presently are directors or officers of First Horizon National Corporation. Rates are subject to annual approval by the Board, but generally remain in effect until changed. The new interest rate, within the context of the entire Plan, has been established at a level intended to provide both retention and long-term non-compete incentives. When a participant retires after 2010 due to mandatory retirement, the participant’s interest rate during retirement will be the highest rate in place over the past three years-that is, the highest of the rates applicable during the year of retirement and the previous two years.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 513 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 513

 For the relief of the Boyd family by clarifying the status of Joseph 
Samuel Boyd as a public safety officer for purposes of payment of death 
             benefits by the Bureau of Justice Assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

 Ms. Sanchez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 For the relief of the Boyd family by clarifying the status of Joseph 
Samuel Boyd as a public safety officer for purposes of payment of death 
             benefits by the Bureau of Justice Assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATUS; LIMITATION.

    (a) Public Safety Officer Status.--For purposes of part L of title 
I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 
3796 et seq.), Joseph Samuel Boyd, formerly of 26427 Waterford Circle, 
Lake Forest, California, is deemed to have been a public safety officer 
who died as the direct and proximate result of a personal injury 
sustained in the line of duty.
    (b) Fee Limitation.--Notwithstanding any contract, no attorney or 
representative may receive more than 10 percent of a payment made as a 
result of subsection (a) for services rendered in connection with 
obtaining such payment. Any person who violates this section shall be 
guilty of an infraction and shall be subject to a fine in the amount 
provided in title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TOSECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

The undersigned, James J. Horvath, ChiefExecutive Officer and President of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that:

 

1.    The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended November 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully  complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation ofthe Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has causedthis instrument to be executed this 14th day of January, 2005.

 
|   | By:                                           | /s/ James J. Horvath |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Name: James J. Horvath                        |
|   | Title: President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|        |                                               |                      |        |  |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
#### *Brizendine’s Adm’x v. Tisdale.

February, 1831,

Richmond.

(Absent Green, J.)

Administrators — Plea of Fully Administered — Verdict— Judgment.* — Debt on bond against administratrix ; plea, fully administered: verdict, in general terms, that defendant has not fully administered ; and judgment thereupon for the debt demanded, to be levied de bonis testatoris : Herd, the verdict is insufficient to warrant the judgment.

Debt by Tisdale against R. Brizendine administratrix of J. Brizendine, on a bond of her intestate for ^519. brought in the circuit court of Amelia. Pleas, Payment by defendant’s intestate — Debts of superiour dignity' — and Rully administered ; on which issues were made up. Upon the trial, the jury found a verdict in these words: “We of the jury find, that the defendant’s intestate has not paid the debt in the declaration mentioned, and that there are no debts of superiour dignity due from the intestate, and that the defendant has not fully administered all the assets which came tO' her hands belonging to her intestate; and therefore, we find for the plaintiff the debt in the declaration &c.” Whereupon, the court gave judgment for the plaintiff, for the debt demanded, to be levied de bonis testatoris. The defendant applied by petition to this court, fora supersedeas to the judgment; which was allowed.

Copland, for the plaintiff in error,

objected that the verdict was insufficient to warrant the judgment, since it did not find the amount of the assets that came to the hands of the administratrix, or that assets, unadministered sufficient to pay the debt, came to her hands.

*

See monographic *note*on “Executors and Administrators” appended to Rosser v. Depriest, 5 Gratt. 6; monographic *note*on “Debt, The Action of” appended to Davis v. Mead, 13 Gratt. 118.

The court, referring to the cases of Sturdivant’s adm’r v. Raines’s ex’or, 1 Leigh 481, and Gardner’s adm’r v. Vidal, 6 Rand. 106, reversed the judgment, and ordered a venire de novo.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KADRIAN RANDOLPH, DOC #C11592, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) Case No. 2D17-1632

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed June 15, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Dane K. Chase, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and C. Todd Chapman,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
§ 962.5 Scope of hearing; evidentiary standard. ( a ) A hearing under this part shall be conducted by the Presiding Officer on the record ( 1 ) to determine whether the Respondent is liable under 31 U.S.C. 3802, and
( 2 ) if so, to determine the amount of any civil penalty or assessment to be imposed.
( b ) The Postal Service must prove its case against a Respondent by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The parties may offer at a hearing on the merits such relevant evidence as they deem appropriate and as would be admissible under the generally accepted rules of evidence applied in the courts of the United States in nonjury trials, subject, however, to the sound discretion of the Presiding Officer in supervising the extent and manner of presentation of such evidence. In general, admissibility will hinge on relevancy and materiality. However, relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.