alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3060.40 Calculation of the assumed Federal income tax. ( a ) The assumed Federal income tax on competitive products income shall be based on the Postal Service theoretical competitive products enterprise income statement for the relevant year and must be calculated in compliance with chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code by computing the tax liability on the taxable income from the competitive products of the Postal Service theoretical competitive products enterprise at the applicable corporate tax rate.
( b ) The end of the fiscal year for the annual calculation of the assumed Federal income tax on competitive products income shall be September 30.
( c ) The calculation of the assumed Federal income tax due shall be submitted to the Commission no later than the January 15 following the close of the fiscal year referenced in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) No estimated Federal income taxes need to be calculated or paid.
( e ) No state, local, or foreign income taxes need to be calculated or paid.
[73 FR 79261, Dec. 24, 2008, as amended at 84 FR 31738, July 3, 2019]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

ROGER THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:22-cv-23637

THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, ROGER THOMAS, by and through the undersigned attorney, hereby informs 

the Court that the parties have reached an amicable settlement of this civil case in its entirety and 

gives notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, against 

defendant THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was furnished to 

Lee W. Marcus (lmarcus@marcusmyerslaw.com) this 21st day of February 2023 via the 

Court’s CM/ECF electronic service system.

/s/ Nick A. Ortiz

Nick A. Ortiz, Esq.

FL Bar No.: 12699

Ortiz Law Firm

316 S. Baylen St., Ste. 590

Pensacola, FL 32502

(850) 308-7833 (T)

(850) 208-3613 (F)

nick@nickortizlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23637-KMW Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 1 of 1
Hypothetical AmeriCorps Health Literacy Program Description 

A disproportionate number of lower socioeconomic and minority groups in an urban region of the state 

have difficulty understanding and acting upon health information. This issue has negative implications 

on residents’ healthcare access, costs, quality, and safety. To combat the growing problem of health 

illiteracy in the county, an AmeriCorps program was created to improve the health literacy and 

ultimately the health and wellness status and quality of life for residents in the area. The program’s core 

components consist of developing and disseminating health and safety information, conduct a series of 

health literacy workshops, and provide individualized health literacy sessions. 

Program Logic Model

Project Resources Core Project 

Components

Evidence of Project 

Implementation 

and Participation

Evidence of Change

INPUTS ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS Outcomes

Short-Term Medium-Term Long-Term

What we invest (# 

and type of 

AmeriCorps 

members)

What we do Direct products 

from program 

activities

Changes in 

knowledge, skills, 

attitudes, 

opinions

Changes in 

behavior or action 

that result from 

participants’ new 

knowledge

Meaningful 

changes, often in 

their condition or 

status in life

Funding 

 

4 FT staff

 

100 AmeriCorps 

members serve as 

health care 

advisors

 

10 partnerships 

with communitybased 

organizations 

Member training

Develop and 

disseminate 

accurate, 

accessible, and

actionable health 

and safety 

information

Conduct health 

literacy workshops

Provide 

individualized 

health literacy 

sessions 

500 health and 

safety education 

materials 

disseminated

4 half-day 

workshop sessions 

(at least 20 

residents per 

session; 80 total)

 

100 individual and 

small group health 

literacy sessions 

(60 mins each) 

serving 300 people

Increase in 

residents’ 

understanding of 

prevention and 

self-management

of conditions

Increase in 

residents’ 

motivation to 

adopt good health 

practices

Increase in 

residents ability to 

search for and use 

health 

information 

Increase in 

residents’ 

adoption of 

healthy behaviors 

and 

recommendations 

of the program 

(such as getting 

necessary medical 

tests)

Improved health 

and wellness 

status and quality 

of life for 

residents in the 

area
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEAL S, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 552

- CR

Trenton Yarbrough

, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 004154 , HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS , JUDGE PRESIDING

Trenton Yarbrough seeks to appeal from an order revoking community supervision.
Sentence was imposed on June 18, 2002. There was no motion for new trial. The deadline for perfecting
appeal was therefore July 18, 2002. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Notic e of appeal was filed on July 30,
2002. No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Under the
circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by
dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo

v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

- 23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).2 The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________ Mack Kidd, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: September 19, 2002

Do Not Publish
Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 1 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 2 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 3 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 4 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 5 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 6 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 7 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 8 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 9 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 10 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 11 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 12 of 13

Case 4:22-cr-10014-DPG   Document 18   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/25/2022   Page 13 of 13
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 1, 2022

No. 04-21-00366-CV

Vonda L. COLLIER,

Appellant

v.

Hayward COLLIER,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CV04756

Honorable J Frank Davis, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The brief of appellant Vonda L. Collier was originally due on December 29, 2021. To 

date, appellant has not filed a brief. Appellant is therefore ORDERED to file, within fifteen 

days of the date of this order, her brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) her

failure to timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee Hayward Collier is not significantly injured by 

appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written 

response, we will dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see 

also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if an appellant fails to comply with a

court order).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of February, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
#### § 961.5 Effect of filing a petition.

Upon receipt and docketing of the employee's petition for a hearing, further collection activity by the Postal Service must cease, as required by section 5 of the Debt Collection Act until the petition is resolved by the Hearing Official.
#### § 3040.212 Limitations applicable to competitive mail matter.

The Postal Service shall notify the Commission of updates to size and weight limitations for competitive mail matter pursuant to subpart E of this part.

[72 FR 63698, Nov. 9, 2007. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5485

To temporarily exempt from restrictions on carriage in coastwise trade the

transport of petroleum and petroleum products between ports designated

by the President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 18, 2000

Mr. BARTON of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To temporarily exempt from restrictions on carriage in coastwise trade the transport of petroleum and petroleum

products between ports designated by the President.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM RESTRICTIONS ON CAR4 RIAGE IN COASTWISE TRADE FOR TRANS5 PORT OF PETROLEUM BETWEEN CERTAIN

6 PORTS.

7 Section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46

8 App. U.S.C. 883) and sections 12104(2) and 12106(b) of
2

HR 5485 IH

1 title 46, United States Code, shall not apply during the

2 90-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of

3 this Act to transport by water of any petroleum or petro4 leum product between any 2 ports in the United States

5 designated by the President for purposes of this section.

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.11


 


STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


This Stock Purchase Agreement is dated as of this 25" day
of March, 2019 by and between Matthew Wolfson (the ASeller”) and Petar Gajic (the “Buyer’).


 


WHEREAS, the Buyer is an employee of Electromedical Technologies,
Inc., a Delaware company (the “Company”); and


 


WHEREAS, previously, the Seller had orally agreed to sell 500,000
of his shares of the Company (the “Shares”) to the Buyer for the par price per share which Seller paid for his shares
of the Company; and


 


WHEREAS, the Seller and Buyer agree that it is in their best
interest to memorialize in writing the sale of the Shares.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of
the mutual promises, covenants, representations and warranties contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration,
and with the intent that, upon consummation of the transactions contemplated herein, and upon the terms set forth herein the
parties hereby agree to as follows:


 


	1.	The Seller agrees to sell, and Buyer agrees to purchase, the Shares for $50.00.



 


	2.	Seller represents that he has good and marketable title to the Shares. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement
as of the date



 


first written above.


 


SELLER: MATTHEW WOLSON BUYER: PETAR GAJIC.


 


Mathew fson Petar Gajic


 


11-ZU1U


 


Yur I-JIU45


 


Notice to Purchaser - In the event that this check is lost,
misplaced or Cashier's Check - Customer Copy


 


stolen, a sworn statement and 90-day waiting period will be
required prior to replacement This check should be negotiated within 90 days


 


Void After 90 Days


 


TATUM AND BELL 0009 0002764 0145


 


BANK OF Pay AMERICA® an


 


Fifty and 00/100 Dollars ToThe MATTHEW WOLFSON


 






     


     


    

 


Order Of 500,000 SHARES PURCHASE Remitter (Purchased By): PETAR
GAJIC


 


Bank of America, N.A. PHOENIX, AZ


 


91-170/1221 NAZ


 


No. 0911517346 Date 04/17/19 02:02:25 PM


 


$50.00


 


Not-Negotiable


 


Customer Copy Retain for your Records


 


457002931704
Case 1:22-cv-23651-JEM   Document 9   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-23651-JEM   Document 9   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2023   Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.1350)

 

The undersigned executive officer ofPeoples Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that theRegistrant’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theRegistrant.

 

 
|   | /s/Jerry D.  Williams                               |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  Jerry D. Williams                       |
|   | Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date:  December 23, 2003

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained byPeoples Community Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 101-30.4901-1303 Standard Form 1303, Request for Federal Cataloging/Supply Support Action.

The form illustrated in § 101-30.4901-1303 is filed with the original document and does not appear in the Federal Register.

Federal Register.

[43 FR 18674, May 2, 1978]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

          AMERCO DECLARES DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTION OF
               PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS
                              
     RENO, NEV.- (AUG. 7, 1998)  On July 13, 1998, the Board
of Directors of AMERCO (Nasdaq: UHAL) approved the adoption
of a Shareholder Rights Plan designed to discourage
takeovers that involve abusive tactics or do not provide
fair value to shareholders.  Similar plans have been adopted
by many other publicly traded companies.  AMERCO has had a
Shareholder Rights Plan in place since 1988.

     The Shareholder Rights Plan provides for a dividend
distribution of one Preferred Stock Purchase Right for each
outstanding share of AMERCO common stock.  The dividend
distribution will be made to shareholders of record on
August 17, 1998.  Each shareholder is automatically entitled
to the Rights and no physical distribution of new
certificates will be made at this time.  The Rights
distribution is not taxable to shareholders.

     Following the acquisition of 10% or more of AMERCO's
common stock by a person or group, the holders of the Rights
(other than the acquiring person) will be entitled to
purchase shares of common stock at one-half the then current
market price, and, in the event of a subsequent merger or
other acquisition of the Company, to buy shares of common
stock of the acquiring entity at one-half of the market
price of those shares.

     AMERCO will be able to redeem the Rights at $0.01 per
Right at any time until a person or group acquires 10% or
more of the Company's shares.

     A letter outlining the Shareholder Rights Plan in more
detail will be sent to the Company's shareholders following
the record date.
SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

BRIAN KERRY O'KEEFE, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 69036 

FILED 

JUN 2 2 2016 

TRACE K. LINDEMAN 

CLERgF UPREME COURT 

BY • 

DEPUTY CLERK 

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a 

postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial 

District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge. 

Appellant filed his postconviction petition on September 15, 

2014, more than one year after the remittitur issued on direct appeal on 

July 23, 2013. 1 O'Keefe v. State, Docket No. 61631 (Order of Affirmance, 

April 10, 2013). Therefore, the petition was untimely filed and 

procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and prejudice. 

See NRS 34.726(1). 

As cause to overcome the procedural default, appellant argues 

that counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion for a stay of the 

remittitur in his direct appeal. Had counsel done so, he contends, his 

postconviction petition would have been timely under NRS 34.726. 

Counsel's failure to seek a stay of the remittitur is not an impediment 

'The district court appointed counsel to represent appellant in the 

postconviction proceedings. See NRS 34.750. 

(0) 1947A QC° 
J. 

external to the defense that prevented appellant from timely filing his 

postconviction petition. Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252, 71 P.3d 

503, 506 (2003). Because appellant failed to establish good cause to excuse 

the delay in filing his petition, the district court did not err by denying the 

petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

J. 

Cherry 

Gibboffs 

cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Brian Kerry O'Keefe 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2We have considered the pro se document filed in this court on April 

7, 2016, and conclude that no relief is warranted. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A en
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 521

Concerning denial of passports to noncustodial parents subject to State arrest

warrants in cases of nonpayment of child support.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

A BILL

Concerning denial of passports to noncustodial parents subject to State arrest warrants in cases of nonpayment

of child support.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Denial of Passports

5 to Noncustodial Parents in Cases of Nonpayment of Child

6 Support’’.
2

•HR 521 IH

1 SEC. 2. DENIAL OF PASSPORTS TO NONCUSTODIAL PAR2 ENTS SUBJECT TO STATE ARREST WARRANTS

3 IN CASES OF NONPAYMENT OF CHILD SUP4 PORT.

5 The Secretary of State is authorized to refuse a pass6 port or revoke, restrict, or limit a passport in any case

7 in which the Secretary of State determines or is informed

8 by competent authority that the applicant or passport

9 holder is a noncustodial parent who is the subject of an

10 outstanding State warrant of arrest for nonpayment of

11 child support, where the amount in controversy is not less

12 than $10,000.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37777-37778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15275]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Intent To File an Application for a New License

June 12, 2000.
    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File an Application for a 
New License.
    b. Project No.: 2183.
    c. Date Filed: May 31, 2000.
    d. Submitted By: Grand River Dam Authority--current license.
    e. Name of Project: Markham Ferry Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Grand River near the City of Pryor, in Mayes 
County, Oklahoma.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Section 15 of the Federal Power Act.
    h. Licensee Contract: Robert W. Sullivan, Jr., Grand River Dam 
Authority, P.O. Box 409, Vinita, OK 74301 (918) 256-5545.
    i. FERC Contact: Tom Dean, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83f7ebeceee2f0ade7e6e2edc3e5e6f1e0ade5e6e7adf6f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="daaeb2b5b7bba9f4bebfbbb49abcbfa8b9f4bcbfbef4afa9">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 219-2778.
    j. Effective date of current license: June 1, 1955.
    k. Expiration date of current license: May 31, 2005.
    l. Description of the Project: The project consists of the 
following existing facilities: (1) The 90-foot-high, 3,744-foot-long 
Robert S. Kerr Dam comprised of an earthen embankment section, a

[[Page 37778]]

concrete non-overflow section and gated spillway; (2) the 45-foot-high, 
6,200-foot-long Salina dike; (3) a reservoir at a normal power pool 
elevation of 619 feet msl; (4) a powerhouse integral with the dam 
containing four generating units with a total installed capacity of 100 
MW, and (5) other appurtenances.
    m. Each application for a new license and any competing license 
applications must be filed with the Commission at least 24 months prior 
to the expiration of the existing license. All applications for license 
for this project must be filed by May 31, 2003.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15275 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: July 30, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Lora Strine, EPA

SUBJECT: June 19, 2015 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants

SUMMARY

A phone call was held between EPA and Ken Colburn, Regulatory Assistance Project on June 19, 

2015 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan 

for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Regulatory Assistance Project

Ken Colburn

Chris James

David Farnsworth

US EPA

Lora Strine

Angie Shatas

Elineth Torres
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECURITISATION ADVISORY SERVICES PTY. LIMITED
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

         The  undersigned  officer  of  Securitisation  Advisory  Services  Pty.
Limited,  a  company  organized  under the laws of New  South  Wales,  Australia
("SAS"), hereby certifies on behalf of SAS and on his own behalf for purposes of
the Class A-1 Mortgage Backed Floating Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

         1.    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of SAS;

         2.    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's
               Certificate on behalf of SAS; and

         3.    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer Trustee has complied
               with all conditions and covenants under the transaction
               documents for the Series 2001-1G Medallion Trust issue of
               Notes for the period between July 1, 2001 and June 30, 2002.

         Capitalized  terms used and not defined  herein shall have the meanings
assigned   to  such  terms  in  the   Prospectus   Supplement   related  to  the
above-referenced issue of Notes.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of December 20, 2002.


                                      By:    /S/ GEOFFREY MICHAEL STEEL
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Name:   Geoffrey Michael Steel
                                         Title:  Director