alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED 

: ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 24-0293 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TRAVIS WAYNE HATFIELD, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER 

Bowen Greenwood 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

STATE OF MONTANA 

FILED 

MAY 2 1 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

Cterk of Suprerne Court 

St.....te of Morrt:-.4rra 

Travis Wayne Hatfield petitions this Court for an out-of-time appeal, explaining he 

is currently incarcerated in the Riverside Special Needs Unit, after receiving medical 

treatment, and that the facility has limited legal resources. He states that both of his public 

defenders "informed [him] that they [do not] generally provide [appellate] legal 

assistance." Hatfield includes a copy of the sentencing judgment as well as a motion to 

appoint counsel. 

On January 14, 2024, the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, 

issued its written judgment, sentencing Hatfield to the Montana State Prison for a 

thirty-year terrn and a ten-year concurrent term for felony sexual intercourse without 

consent and felony sexual abuse of children, respectively. 

M. R. App. P. 4(6) allows this Court to grant an out-of-time appeal "[i]n the 

infrequent harsh case and under extraordinary circumstances arnounting to a gross 

miscarriage of justice[.]" 

Hatfield was convicted and sentenced recently. This Court concludes that Hatfield 

is entitled to an appeal and that he may be entitled to representation of counsel. Section 

46-8-104, MCA. Therefore, 

05/21/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0293
IT IS ORDERED that Hatfield's Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hatfield's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is 

GRANTED. The Appellate Defender Division shall have thirty days from the date of this 

Order within which either to file a Notice of Appeal or a Motion to Rescind this Order 

Appointing Counsel. If Hatfield qualifies for appointed counsel, the Appellate Defender 

Division shall immediately order the appropriate transcripts. 

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to discard Hatfield's enclosed Notice of 

Appeal that has not been filed. 

The Clerk is also directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record; to 

the Appellate Defender Divrn, and to Travis Wayne Hatfield personally. 

DATED this —day of May, 2024. 

hief Justice 

Justices
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23753-KMM

EDWIN GARRISON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

-vsSAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Stuart Z. Grossman, Esq., of the law firm Grossman Roth Yaffa Cohen, P.A., hereby enters 

his appearance as co-counsel on behalf of Plaintiffs and respectfully requests that copies of all 

future pleadings, orders, and other papers filed or served in this matter be served on him via 

CM/ECF or at the address listed below, as appropriate. 

Dated: March 9, 2023. 

 Respectfully submitted,

 

 Stuart Z. Grossman 

 Florida Bar No.: 156113 

 GROSSMAN ROTH YAFFA COHEN, P.A.

 2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Suite 1150 

 Coral Gables, FL 33134 

 Ph: 305-442-8666 

 Fx: 305-285-1668 

 szg@grossmanroth.com 

 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2023 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 9, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed 

with the Court via the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys 

of record. 

 

 

 Stuart Z. Grossman 

 Florida Bar No.: 156113 

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2023 Page 2 of 2
#### § 101-26.601 [Reserved]
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of VoIP, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A
      for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Staats, Chief
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Date:
              October 27,
              2006/s/ Robert
              StaatsRobert
                Staats
              Chief
                Accounting Officer
KIM VAUGHAN LERNER LLP 

EXHIBIT 1 

Case 1:22-cv-23617-JAL Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2022 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:22-cv-23617-JAL Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2022 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

SCOTT THOMAS MARTIN,

Petitioner

v.

ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON

PLEAS,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 51 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4 th day of January , 202 4

, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Other Extraordinary

Relief” is DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO N IN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-20-0000074

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

M& W5 CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARC L. WONG, Defendant-Appellant

A PPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT H ONOLULU DIVISION (CIVIL NO. 1RC19-1-281)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Proposed Stipulation for Dismissal Without Prejudice of the Appeal Entered From Judgment For Possession and Writ of Possession, Filed on Jan. 16, 2020, and Proposed Orders, Filed Feb. 14, 2020 ( Stipulation ) , filed April 14, 2020, by Defendant-Appellant Marc L. Wong, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal without prejudice and bear their own attorneys' fees and costs on appeal; (2) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-20-0000074 29-APR-2020 09:57 AMN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO N IN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### appeal; (3) the appeal has been docketed; and (4) dismissal is authorized by Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved in part and the appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs on appeal.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, April 29, 2020. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE, I, PHILIP E.
LUNDQUIST, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF HALIFAX INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (THE
"COMPANY"), HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

(1) I HAVE REVIEWED THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF THE COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 (THE "REPORT") [TO WHICH THIS STATEMENT IS AN
EXHIBIT];

(2) THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13(A) OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934; AND

(3) THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL MATERIAL
RESPECTS, THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY.

HALIFAX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

/s/ PHILIP E. LUNDQUIST
-----------------------
NAME: PHILIP E. LUNDQUIST

TITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

DATE: MAY 6, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6140

JASON A. MORANT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOUGLAS M. VAUGHN, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center, in his individual and official capacity; ANITA BRYANT, Regional Ombudsman, in her individual and official capacity; G. K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director for the Central Region; JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00155-JBF-JEB)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 4, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason A. Morant, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Jason A. Morant appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Morant v. Vaughn , No. 2:08-cv-00155-JBF-JEB (E.D. Va.

filed Jan. 8, 2009 & entered Jan. 9, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 101-4.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753- MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE PRO HAC VICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Michele D. Johnson of the law firm Latham & Watkins LLP

appears as counsel for Defendant Lawrence Gene David, and requests that all papers served in this 

case also be delivered to and served at the address set forth below. 

Per Rule 4(b)(4) of the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer Review, and 

Discipline of Attorneys for the Southern District of Florida, Ms. Johnson was previously admitted 

to appear pro hac vice in this case on behalf of Defendants Thomas Brady and Gisele Bündchen

and states that all information provided in support of her initial pro hac vice motion remains current 

and correct, including the sponsoring co-counsel.

Dated: April 6, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

COLSON HICKS EIDSON, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

By: Roberto Martínez

Roberto Martínez

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 113 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida Bar No. 305596 

Email: bob@colson.com

 Attorney for Defendant Lawrence Gene David

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 113 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-23697-KMM

JOSE RAFAEL GONZÁLEZ OLLARVES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LEANDRO AÑEZ, CRIB MUSIC, LLC,

ANA GONZÁLEZ AND INNERCAT

MUSIC GROUP, LLC,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Jose Rafael González Ollarves (“Plaintiff”), together with Defendants, Leandro 

Añez, Crib Music, LLC, Ana González, and Innercat Music Group, LLC (“Defendants”) 

(collectively the “Parties”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby notify the 

Court that the Parties have entered into a written settlement agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) 

and stipulate to dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and agree as follows, in accordance with the 

Settlement Agreement:

1. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice with each Party to bear their own 

respective attorney’s fees and costs in this lawsuit.

2. The Parties request that the Honorable Judge K. Michael Moore, United States 

District Court, Southern District of Florida, retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement 

Agreement, if necessary.

3. The effectiveness of this stipulation of dismissal is conditioned upon the Court’s 

entry of an order retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties’ Settlement Agreement. 

Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012).

Case 1:22-cv-23697-KMM Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request the Court enter an Order of Dismissal 

dismissing this case with prejudice, reserving jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties’ 

Settlement Agreement, and granting such other and further relief this Court deems just and proper.

DATE: July 24, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

MARK MIGDAL & HAYDEN

80 S.W. 8th Street, Suite 1999

Miami, Florida 33130

Telephone: (305) 374-0440

By: s/ Darci Cohen

Etan Mark, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 720852

Darci E. Cohen, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 90971

etan@markmigdal.com

darci@markmigdal.com

eservice@markmigdal.com

WEISS SEROTA HELFMAN COLE & 

BIERMAN, P.L. 

2800 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Suite 1200

Coral Gables FL 33134

T: 305-854-0800

F: 305-854-2323

By: /s/ Richard Rosengarten

Alan K. Fertel

Florida Bar No. 435066 

Primary e-mail: afertel@wsh-law.com

Secondary e-mail: isevilla@wsh-law.com

Richard B. Rosengarten

Florida Bar No. 0106169

Primary e-mail: rrosengarten@wsh-law.com

Secondary e-mail: szavala@wsh-law.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I filed the foregoing document (including any attached exhibits and 

documents) electronically on the Court’s CM/ECF docket on July 24, 2023, which served same 

electronically upon all counsel of record.

By: s/ Darci Cohen 

Darci Cohen, Esq.

Case 1:22-cv-23697-KMM Document 54 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 of AMERCO (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 2, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Jason A. Berg, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








AMERCO,





a Nevada corporation





/s/ Jason A. Berg





Jason A. Berg


Principal Financial Officer and


Chief Accounting Officer


Date: February 2, 2011
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6176
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Morgantown, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00020-IMK) Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 30, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. Betsy S. Jividen, Assistant United States Attorney, Alan Gordon McGonigal, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry Arnold Young, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Warden, Fed. Corr. Inst. , No. 3:06-cv00020-IMK (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
(LOGO) HOMESIDE LENDING, INC.

Management Assertion Letter

As of and for the year ended  September  30, 1999,  HomeSide  Lending,  Inc. has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period,  HomeSide Lending
had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and  omissions  policy in the amount of
$76 million and $20 million, respectively.

William Glasgow,Jr.
Executive Vice President

December 17, 1999
imax-ex1041_102.htm



 

 

IMAX CORPORATION

Exhibit 10.41

 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) dated as of August 2, 2019 is entered into by and between IMAX CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of Canada (the “Company”), and PATRICK MCCLYMONT (the “Executive”).

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend that certain Employment Agreement between them dated as of June 6, 2016 (the “Agreement”), as hereinafter set forth.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.Term.  Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence thereof in its entirety and replacing it with the following:  

“The Executive’s employment pursuant to this Agreement shall be effective as of August 8, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), and shall terminate upon the earlier to occur of (i) the Executive’s termination of employment pursuant to Section 4 hereunder and (ii) November 8, 2019 (the “End Date”).”

2.No Further Changes. Except with respect to the change made by Section 1 above, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect.

3.Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by either of the parties hereto in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed this Amendment as of August 2, 2019.

 


						
	
IMAX CORPORATION 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
PATRICK MCCLYMONT

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Kenneth Weissman
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
/s/ Patrick McClymont

	
Name:
	
Kenneth Weissman
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Title:
	
SVP, Legal Affairs and
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Corporate Secretary
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Carrie Lindzon-Jacobs
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Name:
	
Carrie Lindzon-Jacobs
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Title:
	
Chief Human Resources Officer and
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Executive Vice President
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5302

To designate the United States courthouse located at 1010 Fifth Avenue

in Seattle, Washington, as the ‘‘William Kenzo Nakamura United States

Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 2000

Mr. MCDERMOTT (for himself, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. METCALF, Mr. BAIRD, Mr.

HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. DICKS, Ms. DUNN, Mr.

SMITH of Washington, Mr. MATSUI, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, and Mr. WU)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 1010

Fifth Avenue in Seattle, Washington, as the ‘‘William

Kenzo Nakamura United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 1010 Fifth

5 Avenue in Seattle, Washington, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘William Kenzo Nakamura United States

7 Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 5302 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘William Kenzo Nakamura United States Court6 house’’.

Æ
#### § 101-29.403-3 Tailoring of Federal product descriptions.

Product descriptions prepared to define and impose performance characteristics, engineering disciplines, and manufacturing practices such as reliability, system safety, quality assurance, maintainability, configuration management, and the like shall be tailored in accordance with their specific application in acquisitions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF ENTRADA SOFTWARE,  INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         211,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               221,400
<PP&E>                                          37,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,305
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        250
<COMMON>                                         6,730
<OTHER-SE>                                     456,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   281,093
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,209
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               337,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (286,769)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (286,769)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (286,769)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
#### § 80.1390 Haro Strait and Strait of Georgia.

The 72 COLREGS shall apply on all waters of the Haro Strait and the Strait of Georgia.

[CGD 81-087, 46 FR 61457, Dec. 17, 1981; 47 FR 3351, Jan. 25, 1982, and 49 FR 3177, Jan. 26, 1984]