alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5400

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the retail tax

on heavy trucks and trailers to exclude tractors suitable for use with

vehicles weighing 33,000 pounds or less.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 2000

Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma (for himself and Mr. WATKINS) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify

the retail tax on heavy trucks and trailers to exclude

tractors suitable for use with vehicles weighing 33,000

pounds or less.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RETAIL TAX ON HEAVY

4 TRUCKS AND TRAILERS TO EXCLUDE TRAC5 TORS SUITABLE FOR USE WITH VEHICLES

6 WEIGHING 33,000 POUNDS OR LESS.

7 (a) TRACTORS SUBJECT TO TAX ONLY IF SUITABLE

8 FOR USE WITH HEAVY TRAILERS OR SEMITRAILERS.—
2

•HR 5400 IH

1 Paragraph (2) of section 4051(a) of the Internal Revenue

2 Code of 1986 (relating to exclusion for trucks weighing

3 33,000 pounds or less) is amended to read as follows:

4 ‘‘(2) EXCLUSION FOR TRUCKS, ETC., WEIGHING

5 33,000 POUNDS OR LESS.—The tax imposed by para6 graph (1) shall not apply to any article described in

7 subparagraph (A), (B), or (E) of paragraph (1)—

8 ‘‘(A) which is suitable for use with a vehi9 cle which has a gross vehicle weight of 33,000

10 pounds or less (as determined under regulations

11 prescribed by the Secretary), and

12 ‘‘(B) which, in the case of an article de13 scribed in subparagraph (E), is not øused/in14 tended for use?¿ in a trade or business.’’

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

16 this section shall take effect on January 1, 2001.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Alico, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2010 (the Form 10-Q), I, JD
Alexander, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2010              
|                                   
|/S/ JD ALEXANDER                   
|JD Alexander                       
|President & Chief Executive Officer
§ 102-3.100 What are the responsibilities and functions of GSA? ( a ) The responsibilities of the Administrator under sec. 7 of the Act (codified at 5 U.S.C. 1006) have been delegated by the Administrator to the Committee Management Secretariat within GSA's Office of Government-wide Policy.
( b ) The Secretariat carries out its responsibilities by: ( 1 ) Engaging in consultations with agencies on the establishment, re-establishment, renewal, merger, and termination of discretionary advisory committees;
( 2 ) Prescribing guidance applicable to advisory committees;
( 3 ) Assisting other agencies in implementing and interpreting the Act;
( 4 ) Conducting an annual comprehensive review of Government-wide advisory committee accomplishments, costs, benefits, and other indicators to measure performance;
( 5 ) Developing and providing Government-wide training regarding the Act and related statutes and principles;
( 6 ) Supporting the Interagency Committee on Federal Advisory Committee Management and FACA Attorney Council to improve compliance with the Act;
( 7 ) Designing and maintaining a FACA database to facilitate data collection, reporting, and use of information required by the Act;
( 8 ) Preparing regulations on Federal advisory committees;
( 9 ) Identifying performance measures that may be used to evaluate advisory committee accomplishments; and
( 10 ) Providing recommendations for transmittal by the Administrator to Congress and the President regarding proposals to improve accomplishment of the objectives of the Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5537 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5537

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To waive the period of Congressional review of the Child in Need of 
                   Protection Amendment Act of 2000.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5537

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To waive the period of Congressional review of the Child in Need of 
                   Protection Amendment Act of 2000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (sec. 1-
233(c)(1), D.C. Code), the Child in Need of Protection Amendment Act of 
2000 (D.C. Bill 13-796) shall take effect on the date of the enactment 
of such Act or the date of the enactment of this Act, whichever is 
later.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(a)

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alberto-Culver Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard
B. Bernick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Howard B. Bernick
---------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 7, 2003
Case 9:22-cv-81650-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022   Page 1 of 9

Case 9:22-cv-81650-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022   Page 2 of 9

Case 9:22-cv-81650-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022   Page 3 of 9

Case 9:22-cv-81650-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022   Page 4 of 9

Case 9:22-cv-81650-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022   Page 5 of 9

Case 9:22-cv-81650-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022   Page 6 of 9

Case 9:22-cv-81650-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022   Page 7 of 9

Case 9:22-cv-81650-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022   Page 8 of 9

Case 9:22-cv-81650-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022   Page 9 of 9
#### § 952.34 Ex parte communications.

The provisions of 5 U.S.C. 551(14), 556(d), and 557(d) prohibiting ex parte communications apply to proceedings under these rules of practice.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Herbert M. Mueller, the Chief Financial Officer
of Delta Apparel, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his
knowledge:

      1.    The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3,
            2004 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with
            the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  September 8, 2004              /s/ Herbert M. Mueller
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Herbert M. Mueller
                                      Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Delta Apparel, Inc. and will be retained by Delta Apparel, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 9 -00 165 -CR
Wil lia m F lor e s , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-08 -20 0535 , HO NORAB LE JIM CORO NADO , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N P ER CURIAM

Appellant’s br ief wa s due in this Court on Aug ust 10, 2009. On September 8, 2009, we notified a

ppel l an t ’s co u n s el that appe llant’s brief w as over due and that if we did not rec eive a satisfa ctory

response from counsel on or be fore September 18, 2009, a hear ing be fore the district court pursua

nt to Tex . R. App. P. 38.8(b) would be order ed. To date, a ppellant’s brie f has not been f

iled, nor have we r ece ived a r esponse f rom counsel. We t he re fo re a bate the c a

us e and re mand it to the dis tr ic t court to h old a he ari ngin
acc ordanc e with rule 38.8 of the rules of

appellate proce dure. Te x . R. App. P
. 38.8(b)( 2), (3). The dis tr ic t c ourt

sh a ll h old

a he ari ngimm e diate ly

to d e te rm ine wh e the r a pp e lla nt s til l w ish e s to pr os e c ute his a

pp e a l, wh e the r a

pp e lla nt is i nd ig e nt, and

wh e the r c ouns e l ha s a

ba nd on e d th e a

pp e a l. Se e id
. I f a

pp e lla nt d e sir e s to a pp eal and is i nd ig e nt, the dis tr ic t c ourt sh ou ld m a ke a

pp ro pr ia te2

order s to ensure that appellant is ade quately repr esente d on appea l. Se e id
. Fo l l o wi n g t h e h ea ri n g, the district court should orde r the a ppropriate supplementary cler k’s and r eporte r’s re cords to be prepa red a nd forwa rded to this Court no later than N ovember 12, 2009. Se e id
.

Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and Pember

ton Abated Filed: Oc tober 13, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
§ 101-39.305 Storage. ( a ) GSA Interagency Fleet Management System (IFMS) vehicles shall be stored and parked at locations which provide protection from pilferage or damage. In the interest of economy, no cost storage shall be used whenever practicable and feasible.
( b ) The cost of parking and storing GSA IFMS vehicles is the responsibility of the using agency. Prior to the procurement of other than temporary parking accommodations in urban centers (see § 101-l8.102), agencies shall determine the availability of Government-owned or -controlled parking space in accordance with the provisions of § 101-17.101-6.
[56 FR 59890, Nov. 26, 1991]
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00466-CV

JOHN LANDER

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE 

FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, INC., ASSET- BACKED 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-23

On Appeal from the

224th District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-CI-07935

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 24, 2022
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5617

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to improve provisions concerning

the recovery of damages for injuries resulting from oil spills.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 1, 2000

Mr. DEFAZIO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to improve provisions concerning the recovery of damages for injuries

resulting from oil spills.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fishery and Aqua5 culture Oil Spill Assistance Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. INTEREST; PARTIAL PAYMENT OF CLAIMS.

7 Section 1005 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33

8 U.S.C. 2705) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing:

10 ‘‘(c) LOAN PROGRAM.—
2

•HR 5617 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall estab2 lish a loan program to assist injured parties in meet3 ing financial obligations during the claims procedure

4 described in section 1013.

5 ‘‘(2) CONDITION FOR LOAN.—A loan may be

6 awarded under paragraph (1) only to a fisherman or

7 aquaculture producer to whom a responsible party

8 has failed to provide an interim payment under sub9 section (a).’’.

10 SEC. 3. USES OF THE FUND.

11 Section 1012(a) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33

12 U.S.C. 2712(a)) is amended—

13 (1) in paragraph (5)(C), by striking the period

14 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

15 (2) by adding at the end the following:

16 ‘‘(6) the making of loans to assist any injured

17 party in paying financial obligations during the

18 claims procedure described in section 1013.’’.

19 SEC. 4. STUDY.

20 Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment

21 of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation

22 with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection

23 Agency, shall submit to Congress a study that contains—

24 (1) an assessment of the effectiveness of the

25 claims procedures and emergency response programs
3

•HR 5617 IH

1 under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C.

2 2701 et seq.) concerning claims filed by, and emer3 gency responses carried out to protect the interests

4 of, fishermen and aquaculture producers; and

5 (2) any legislative or other recommendations to

6 improve the procedures and programs referred to in

7 paragraph (1).

Æ
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5550

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain steam or other vapor generating

boilers used in nuclear facilities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 25, 2000

Mr. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain steam or other

vapor generating boilers used in nuclear facilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN STEAM OR

4 OTHER VAPOR GENERATING BOILERS USED

5 IN NUCLEAR FACILITIES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

9 new subheading:
2

•HR 5550 IH

‘‘ 9902.84.02 Watertube boilers

with a steam production exceeding

45 t per hour,

for use in nuclear

facilities (provided for in subheading

8402.11.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2002 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by

3 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered,

4 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on

5 or after the 15th day after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act.

7 (2) APPLICATION TO LIQUIDATIONS OR RELIQ8 UIDATIONS.—Notwithstanding section 514 of the

9 Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law and

10 subject to paragraph (3), any article described in

11 heading 9902.84.02 of the Harmonized Tariff

12 Schedule of the United States (as added by sub13 section (a)) that was entered, or withdrawn from

14 warehouse for consumption—

15 (A) on or after January 1, 2000, and

16 (B) before the date that is 15 days after

17 the date of the enactment of this Act,

18 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such heading

19 9902.84.02 applied to such entry or withdrawal, and

20 the Secretary of the Treasury shall refund any ex21 cess duty paid with respect to such entry.
3

•HR 5550 IH

1 (3) REQUESTS.—Liquidation or reliquidation

2 may be made under paragraph (2) with respect to

3 any entry only if a request therefor is filed with the

4 Customs Service, within 180 days after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act, that contains sufficient

6 information to enable the Customs Service—

7 (A) to locate the entry; or

8 (B) to reconstruct the entry if it cannot be

9 located.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/BECERRA

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Eric A. Fitzgerald, Esq., Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices 

of Electronic Filing (the “Motion”), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District 

of Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having 

considered the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

The Motion is GRANTED. Eric A. Fitzgerald, Esq. may appear and participate in this 

action on behalf of Defendant William Trevor Lawrence. The Clerk shall provide electronic 

notification of all electronic filings to Eric A. Fitzgerald, Esq. at eric.fitzgerald@mgclaw.com.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at , Florida, this 

day of .

 

United States District Judge

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 63-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2023 Page 1 of 1
01 / 13 /201 4

To: AFS - 300 U.S.	Department	of	Transportation Docket	Operations West	Building	Ground	Floor	Room	W12 - 140 1200	New	Jersey	Avenue S E.,	Washington,	DC	20590. Subject: Request	for Extension for Exemption No.	10679 ,		Docket	No.	FAA - 2012 - 1208 This	is	to	request	an	extension	to	Exemption	No.	10679,	Docket	No.	FAA - 2012 - 1208. This	exemption	has	proven	to	be	beneficial	in	increasing	awareness	of	safety	and to the	reinforcement	of	knowledge	for	the	students. As	stated	in	the	original	request	for	exemption,	these	were	the	objectives.		All	of which	were	exceeded. The benefits to the industry include:

 Reinforcement of skills learned at AMTS by teaching learned s kills to KidVenture attendees at various stations including, Electrical, Inspections, Engines, Structures, Composites, Aerodynamics, Wheel and Brakes.  An expanded understanding of the scope of General Aviation and advancements in technology .  Reinforcement of Human Factors and Safety with messages delivered by guest speakers and other aviation professionals. Students	attended	workshops	and	seminars	in	addition	to	their	assigned	duties	at KidVenture	as	well	as	completing	all	of	their	147	school	assignments.	T hese students	returned	to	school	enlightened	on	their	purpose	for	training	in	general aviation	and	with	a	new	appreciation	for	learning	and	safety. Sincerely, Sheryl	L.	Oxley Aviation	Maintenance	Instructor,	TulsaTech Sheryl.oxley@tulsatech.edu 801	E	91 st St Tulsa,	Ok	74132 Phone:	918 - 828 - 400001 / 13 /201 4

Fax:	918 - 828 - 4119 

# X Sher yl Oxley Aviat ion M

ain tena nc e In stru ct or, T ulsaT ech
#### § 762.24 Guaranty of endorsements.

The presenting bank and the endorsers of a Disbursement Postal Money Order presented to the Postal Service for payment shall be deemed to guarantee to the Postal Service that all prior endorsements are genuine, whether or not an express guaranty is placed on the Disbursement Postal Money Order. When the first endorsement has been made by one other than the payee personally, the presenting bank and the endorsers shall be deemed to guarantee to the Postal Service, in addition to other warranties, that the person who so endorsed had unqualified capacity and authority to endorse the Disbursement Postal Money Order on behalf of the payee.
#### § 101-28.203 Definitions.

As used in this subpart 101-28.2, the following term shall apply.

[42 FR 2317, Jan. 11, 1977]
§ 3030.181 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart allocates additional rate authority to provide the Postal Service with revenue for remittance towards the statutorily mandated amortization payments for supplemental and unfunded liabilities identified in § 3030.182. As described in § 3030.184, for retirement obligation rate authority to be made available, the Postal Service must annually remit towards these amortization payments all revenue collected under this subpart previously. The full retirement obligation rate authority, calculated as described in § 3030.183, shall be phased in over 5 fiscal years, taking into account changes in volume during the phase-in period. If combined with an equal rate increase on Competitive products, the compounded rate increase resulting from retirement obligation rate authority is calculated to generate sufficient additional revenue at the end of the phase-in period to permit the Postal Service to remit the entire invoiced amount of its amortization payments.
( b ) Until the conclusion of the phase-in period, the Postal Service shall file a notice with the Commission by December 31 of each year that calculates the amount of retirement obligation rate authority that is eligible to be authorized under this subpart.
( c ) The Commission shall review the Postal Service's notice and determine how much, if any, rate authority will be authorized under this subpart. Any rate authority allocated under this subpart: ( 1 ) Shall be made available to the Postal Service as of the date of the Commission's determination;
( 2 ) Must be included in the calculation of the maximum rate adjustment authority in the first generally applicable rate adjustment filed after the Commission's determination;
( 3 ) Shall lapse if not used in the first generally applicable rate adjustment filed after the Commission's determination;
( 4 ) Shall lapse if unused, within 12 months of the Commission's determination, however this paragraph (c)(4) shall not prohibit the Postal Service from making a stand-alone adjustment to one or two generally applicable rate cells, if such a case were to be followed by a broader rate adjustment in the class later in the same fiscal year; and
( 5 ) May not be used to generate unused rate authority, nor shall it affect existing banked rate authority.