alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with this Yearly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Govatski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski

Chief Executive Officer

 

March 31, 2006
----

| Name of Subsidiary                  |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |   | Names Under Which theSubsidiary Conducts Business |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Qwik Track, Inc. (1)                | Nevada | --                            |
| Star-Resolve Detrital Wash, LLC (1) | Nevada | --                            |

| (1)   | Neither Qwik Track, Inc. nor Star-Resolve Detrital Wash, LLC is currently or has been within the past three years an active business entity.  When these respective entities were active, we owned a 100% interest in Qwik Track, Inc. and a 50% membership interest in Star-Resolve Detrital Wash, LLC.  We do not have any present plans to reactivate, or to seek reactivation of, either of these subsidiaries and consider them to be permanently discontinued. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
###### Editorial Note on Part 67

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

#### § 67.25-1 Class “B” structures.

Class “B” structures shall be the structures erected in an area where Class “B” requirements must be met.
### MEMORANDUM TO FILE TO: D ocket No. EPA - R09 - OAR- 2013 - 0904 ; Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Arizona; Regional Haze Requirements; Proposed Rule FROM: Colleen McKaughan Date: May 8, 2013 Subject: Record of Correspondence with Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community and Phoenix Cement 1. Letter to President Diane Enos, dated February 28, 2013

– see docket item C - 02 2. Emails from Colleen McKaughan including Gary Bohnee, SRPMIC, and Verle Martz, Phoenix Cement :  January

29, 2013 - Extension of Public Comment Period  February

4, 2013

– Extension of Public Comment Period  February

26, 2013

– Revised FIP Deadline and Request for Information 3. Emails between Colleen McKaughan and Gary Bohnee, SRPMIC :  February 11, 2013

– Consultation Request  February

12, 2013

– Consultation Followup  February

12, 2013

– Consultation Followup
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



Consent of KPMG LLP



The Board of Directors
OTG Software, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-55152 and 333-35360) on Form S-8 of OTG Software, Inc. of our report dated
January 24, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of OTG Software,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000,
which report appears in the December 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of
OTG Software, Inc.


                                                          KPMG LLP



McLean, VA
March 7, 2001
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael G. Potter, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of STATS ChipPAC Ltd.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.   disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date: February 28, 2006


/s/ Michael G. Potter
----------------------
Michael G. Potter
Chief Financial Officer
§ 179.09 Contents of notification. Each notice required under 46 U.S.C. 4310(b) must include the following additional information: ( a ) The name and address of the manufacturer.
( b ) Identifying classifications including the make, model year, if appropriate, the inclusive dates (month and year) of the manufacture, or serial numbers and any other data necessary to describe the boats or associated equipment that may be affected.
[CGD 72-55R, 37 FR 15776, Aug. 4, 1972, as amended by CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13926, Mar. 28, 1996]
#### § 951.8 Ex parte communications.

The provisions of 5 U.S.C. 551(14), 556(d) and 557(d) prohibiting ex parte communications are made applicable to proceedings under these rules of practice.

[42 FR 5357, Jan. 28, 1977]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual Report of Humatech, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-KSB for the year ending April 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John D. Rottweiler,
Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted pursuant to   906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

          (1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

          (2)     The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in
all  material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/  John D. Rottweiler
-------------------------
John D. Rottweiler
Chief Financial Officer
August 1, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7490

EDWARD YARBOUGH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. E. GUNJA, Warden, FCI Cumberland, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-2696-WMN) Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 20, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward Yarbough, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on September 27, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on September 28, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Edward Yarbough appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Yarbough v. Gunja , No. CA-99-2696-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 28, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37153-37154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14945]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee for Energy-Related Epidemiologic Research: 
Conference Call Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following conference call meeting.
    Name: Advisory Committee for Energy-Related Epidemiologic Research 
(ACERER), Subcommittee for Management Review of the Chernobyl Studies 
(SMRCS).
    Time and Date: 1 p.m.-1:30 p.m., June 26, 2000.
    Place: The conference call will originate at the National Center 
for Environmental Health (NCEH), CDC, in Atlanta, Georgia. Please see 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for details on accessing the conference call.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the availability of 
telephone ports.
    Purpose: This subcommittee is charged with providing guidance to 
the scientific reviewers and staff, and reporting back to the full 
ACERER on the charge from the Department and Congress to assess the 
management, goals, and objectives of the National Cancer Institute 
Chernobyl studies.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The conference call agenda is to reach 
consensus on the review and report submitted by the SRMCS.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This conference call is scheduled to begin 
at 1 p.m., Eastern Time. To participate in the conference call, please 
dial 1-877-322-9654 and enter conference code 970943. You will then be 
automatically connected to the call.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael J. Sage, Executive 
Secretary, ACERER, and Acting Deputy Director, NCEH, CDC, 4770 Buford 
Highway, NE, (F-28), Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 770/488-
7002, fax 770/488-7015.

[[Page 37154]]

    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: June 8, 2000.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 00-14945 Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tri-Isthmus Group, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures
over financial reporting and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors:
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: January 12, 2009By:

/s/ David HirschhornDavid HirschhornChief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 15 (Monday, January 24, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3726-3727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1534]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration

Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), announcement is made of the 
following National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of 
February 2000.
    The National Advisory Committee on Rural Health will convene its 
thirty-fourth meeting at the time and place specified below:

    Name: National Advisory Committee on Rural Health.
    Date and Time:

February 7, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-4:45 p.m.
February 8, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

[[Page 3727]]

February 9, 2000; 8:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m.

    Place: Washington Court Hotel, 525 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20001. Phone: (202) 628-2100.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Purpose: The National Advisory Committee on Rural Health 
provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary with respect to 
the delivery, research, development, and administration of health 
care services in rural areas.
    Agenda: Monday morning, February 7, at 8:30 a.m. the new 
chairperson, Senator Nancy Kassebaum Baker will open the meeting and 
welcome the Committee members. The first plenary session will be a 
presentation on the rural health issues in the Veterans 
Administration. At 10:00 a.m. the group will move to the National 
Rural Health Association's Policy Institute Congressional Forum 
(also convened in the same hotel). After lunch, presentations will 
include the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the uninsured; update 
on public health and hospital capital, and the Indian Health 
Service.
    Tuesday morning at 8:30 a.m., there will be an update of the 
Office of Rural Health Policy activities, followed by presentations 
on Medicare payment in rural areas, rural mental issues, and an 
update on research and regulatory activities.
    After lunch, Committee discussion will continue on issues 
presented by the Indian Health Service, and Veterans Administration.
    The final plenary session will be convened on Wednesday, 
February 9 at 8:30 a.m. During this session the Committee will 
discuss future activities and next meeting. The meeting will be 
adjourned at 10:30 a.m.
    Anyone requiring information regarding the subject Committee 
should contact Wayne W. Myers, M.D., Executive Secretary, National 
Advisory Committee on Rural Health, Health Resources and Services 
Administration, Room 9A-55, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, telephone (301) 443-0835, Fax (301) 443-2803.
    Persons interested in attending any portion of the meeting 
should contact Sandi Lyles or Lilly Smetana, Office of Rural Health 
Policy, (301) 443-0835.

    Dated: January 14, 2000.
Jane M. Harrison,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 00-1534 Filed 1-21-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
```
§ 960.6 Allowable fees and expenses. ( a ) Awards will be based on rates customarily charged by persons engaged in the business of acting as attorneys, agents and expert witnesses, even if the services were made available without charge or at a reduced rate to the applicant. Attorney fees may not be recovered by parties appearing *pro se* in postal proceedings.
( b ) No award for the fee of an attorney or agent under these rules may exceed $125.00 per hour, or such rate as prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 504. No award to compensate an expert witness may exceed the highest rate at which the Postal Service pays expert witnesses. However, an award may also include the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent, or witness as a separate item, if the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily charges clients separately for such expenses.
( c ) In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought for an attorney, agent or expert witness, the adjudicative officer shall consider the following: ( 1 ) If the attorney, agent or witness is in private practice, his or her customary fee for similar services, or, if an employee of the applicant, the fully allocated cost of the services;
( 2 ) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily performs services;
( 3 ) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;
( 4 ) The time reasonably spent in light of the difficulty or complexity of the issues in the proceeding; and
( 5 ) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services provided.
( d ) The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project or similar matter prepared on behalf of a party may be awarded, to the extent that the charge for the service does not exceed the prevailing rate for similar services, and the study or other matter was necessary for preparation of the applicant's case.
[46 FR 45945, Sept. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 6798, Mar. 5, 1987; 66 FR 55577, Nov. 2, 2001]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5138

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit

against estate and gift taxes to the equivalent of $4,000,000.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 7, 2000

Mr. MORAN of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the unified credit against estate and gift taxes to the

equivalent of $4,000,000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Estate Tax Reduction

5 Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. UNIFIED CREDIT INCREASED TO EQUIVALENT OF

7 $4,000,000 EXCLUSION; INFLATION ADJUST8 MENT OF UNIFIED CREDIT.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 2010 of

10 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to applicable
2

•HR 5138 IH

1 credit amount) is amended by striking all that follows

2 ‘‘were the applicable exclusion amount’’ and inserting ‘‘.

3 For purposes of the preceding sentence, the applicable ex4 clusion amount is $4,000,000.’’

5 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Section 2010 of such

6 Code is amended by redesignating subsection (d) as sub7 section (e) and by inserting after subsection (c) the fol8 lowing new subsection:

9 ‘‘(d) COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT.—In the case of

10 any decedent dying, and gift made, in a calendar year

11 after 2001, the $4,000,000 amount set forth in subsection

12 (c) shall be increased by an amount equal to—

13 ‘‘(1) $4,000,000, multiplied by

14 ‘‘(2) the cost-of-living adjustment determined

15 under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar year by sub16 stituting ‘calendar year 2000’ for ‘calendar year

17 1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof.

18 If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence

19 is not a multiple of $10,000, such amount shall be round20 ed to the nearest multiple of $10,000.’’

21 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (A)

22 of section 2057(a)(3) of such Code is amended by striking

23 ‘‘$625,000’’ and inserting ‘‘the excess of the applicable ex24 clusion amount (determined without regard to this para25 graph) over $675,000’’.
3

•HR 5138 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to estates of decedents dying, and

3 gifts made, after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ