alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1614. WASEEM DAKER v. ROBERT L. RUSSELL, III.

Waseem Daker hasfiled an original mandamus action in this Court, asking this

Court to compel a superior court judge to rule on motions Daker filed in his criminal

case. This case is not, however, subject to original mandamus relief by our Court.

Appellate courts have mandamus authority in aid of their jurisdiction, see Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV, but the need to resort to the appellate courts

for such relief is “extremely rare” because “the superior courts of this state have the

power, in proper cases, to issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition,

specific performance, quo warranto, and injunction.” Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436,

436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983). Moreover, mandamus will issue “only if (1) no other

adequate legal remedy is available to effectuate the relief sought; and (2) the

applicant has a clear legal right to such relief.” Bibb County v. Monroe County, 294

Ga. 730, 734 (2) (755 SE2d 760) (2014).

Thisis not one of the extremely rare instancesin which this Court will exercise

original mandamus jurisdiction. See Gay v. Owens, 292 Ga. 480, 482-483 (2) (738

SE2d 614) (2013). Until Daker has pursued mandamus relief in superior court and

obtained a ruling thereon, there is no basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction. See

Brown, 251 Ga. at 436-437. Accordingly, this petition for a writ of mandamus is

hereby DISMISSED.

August 13, 2020
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/13/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5248 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5248

  To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promulgate 
 regulations regarding allowable costs under the medicaid program for 
     school based services provided to children with disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2000

  Mr. Bonior introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promulgate 
 regulations regarding allowable costs under the medicaid program for 
     school based services provided to children with disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOWABLE MEDICAID COSTS FOR SCHOOL-BASED SERVICES PROVIDED 
              TO CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Education 
shall issue proposed regulations after consultation with the National 
Governors' Association, the National Association of State Directors of 
Special Education, the American Association of Educational Service 
Agencies, the American Public Human Services Administration, and other 
interested groups relating to allowable costs under the administrative 
outreach program of the school based services program that is part of 
the medicaid program established under title XIX of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) with respect to services provided to 
children with disabilities. Any claim that is reasonably based on 
guidance provided orally or in writing by an officer or employee of a 
regional or national office of the Health Care Financing Administration 
submitted with respect to such services prior to the publication of 
final regulations may not be deferred or disallowed.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308,CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

©FF1G8AL BUSINESS cs^j^^ss <^"**S

STATE OF TEXAJS'l \ilSiili § @>T^J

PENALTY FOft /"

PRIVATE m& - -

S, ANGEL RENEE _,....

^urt has dismissed your applicationfor writ of habeas corpus without written

the sentence has been dischargedjfee Exparte Harrington, 310 S.W.3d

ex. Crim. App. 2010). "***''

IV IV

Abel Acosta, Clerk

02 1R

0006557458

i-'v«* ..V ^••J-ggaiftfft, ^ MAILED FROM ZIPCODF 78701 Tr. Ct. No.,C-,1 -009909-1157231 -B WR-78,501 -02

RTNEY BOWES

MAR26 2015

ANGEL RENEE NORRIS

EAST TEXAS TREATMENT FACILITY -*YDC #

1808749

900 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE

HENDERSON, TX 75652 :.,•.

»|.l,-»,M:!<i|.»'|^

UTF

IAMRS3B 7SS52
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5306 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5306

 To prohibit the use of Federal funds to discriminate against the Boy 
Scouts of America on the basis of beliefs promoted by that organization 
or that organization's constitutionally protected expression of beliefs 
      or exercise of associational rights, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2000

Mr. Tancredo (for himself, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Sam 
 Johnson of Texas, Mr. Hilleary, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Smith of 
New Jersey, Mr. Largent, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. 
  Kingston, Mr. Goode, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Schaffer, Mr. 
 Souder, Mr. Dickey, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Sanford, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. DeMint, 
 Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, and Mr. Gary Miller of California) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of Federal funds to discriminate against the Boy 
Scouts of America on the basis of beliefs promoted by that organization 
or that organization's constitutionally protected expression of beliefs 
      or exercise of associational rights, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Scouts Honor Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS.

    No Federal funds may be used (including use for the payment of 
salaries)--
            (1) to discriminate against, investigate, or deny or 
        withdraw access to public property for, the Boy Scouts of 
        America on the basis of beliefs promoted by that organization 
        or that organization's constitutionally protected expression of 
        beliefs or exercise of associational rights; or
            (2) to compel the Boy Scouts of America to employ, enroll, 
        or accept as a member or volunteer an individual whose sexual 
        orientation, sexual behavior, religious beliefs, or absence of 
        religious beliefs is determined by the Boy Scouts of America to 
        be inconsistent with the organization's policies, programs, 
        morals, or mission.
                                 <all>
```
§ 334.880 San Diego Harbor, Calif.; naval restricted area adjacent to Point Loma. ( a ) *The area.* That portion of San Diego Bay southerly of Ballast Point, exclusive of the southwesterly portion of the restricted area described in § 334.612(b) located westerly of the entrance channel, bounded on the west by the shoreline at Point Loma, on the east by the entrance channel west project line, and on the south by latitude 32°40′.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The area is reserved for anchorage of vessels of the U.S. Government and authorized harbor pilot and patrol boats. All other craft may navigate and operate through the area, and temporary mooring of vessels (not to exceed 24 hours) is permissible.
( 2 ) No other vessels shall anchor or moor permanently in the area except by special permission obtained in advance from the Commander, Naval Base, San Diego, Calif.
( 3 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commandant, 11th Naval District, San Diego, Calif., and such agencies as he may designate.
[30 FR 4756, Apr. 14, 1965. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
Exhibit 99(b)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alberto-Culver Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Cernugel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ William J. Cernugel


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


August 8, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552(b)(4) and 552(b)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 26, 2000.
    Time: 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Governor's House Hotel, 17th & Rhode Island Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Contact Person: Stanley C. Oaks, Jr., Scientific Review Branch, 
Division of Extramural Research, Executive Plaza South, Room 400C, 
6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93, 173, 
Biological Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 8, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-14958 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-22940-RAR

(20-CR-20155-RAR-5)

JONNATHAN JESUS GONZALEZ,

Movant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOVANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Movant Jonnathan Jesus Gonzalez’s Motion to 

Dismiss with Prejudice. See Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.”) [ECF No. 28]. The Court had previously 

denied most of Movant’s Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, but granted an evidentiary 

hearing limited to “the ineffective assistance of counsel claim raised in Ground Two of the 

Motion.” Order Denying in Part Motion to Vacate [ECF No. 12] at 19. Movant now indicates, 

through counsel, that “he wishes to dismiss his § 2255 motion with prejudice.” Mot. at 1 (emphasis 

added). 

Having reviewed the motion, the record, and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is 

hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Movant’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice [ECF No. 28] is GRANTED.

2. Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), Ground Two of Movant’s Motion to Vacate [ECF 

No. 1] is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

3. Since Movant failed to make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right” a certificate of appealability related to any claim raised in the Motion to Vacate

Case 1:22-cv-22940-RAR Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

will NOT ISSUE. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000).

4. All hearings and deadlines are TERMINATED and all pending motions are DENIED 

as moot.

5. The Clerk is instructed to CLOSE the case. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, on this 4th day of April, 2023.

 _________________________________

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of record

Jonnathan Jesus Gonzalez

28548-509

Allenwood Low Federal Correctional Institution 

Inmate Mail/Parcels

P.O. Box 1000

White Deer, PA 17887

PRO SE

Case 1:22-cv-22940-RAR Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2023 Page 2 of 2
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2002 Page 1 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2002 Page 2 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2002 Page 3 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2002 Page 4 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2002 Page 5 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2002 Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT 32.3
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMERCO and U-Haul International, Inc. (together, the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert T. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of U-Haul International, Inc. certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:
  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  
 U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
 a Nevada corporation
  /s/ Robert T. Peterson
 Robert T. Peterson
 Chief Financial Officer
  Date: November 9, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 28, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40980 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ENRIQUE QUESADA-LERMA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-7-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Enrique Quesada-Lerma (Quesada) appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Quesada argues (1) his sentence contravened United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and, (2) for the first time on appeal, that his count three conviction should be overturned because the statute cited in the indictment, 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C), purportedly does not criminalize the charged conduct.No. 05-40980 -2- Quesada’s contention that the district court was precluded from enhancing his sentence based on facts that had not been either admitted by him or found beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury is untenable. Post-Booker “[t]he sentencing judge is entitled to find by a preponderance of the evidence all the facts relevant to the determination of a Guideline sentencing range and all facts relevant to the determination of a non-Guidelines
sentence.” United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). Quesada’s guilty plea renders his defective indictment claim waived because “[a] voluntary guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects in the proceedings against the defendant,” United States v. Glinsey , 209 F.3d 386, 392 (5th Cir. 2000), and an allegedly defective indictment does not deprive a district court of jurisdiction. United States v. Cotton , 535 U.S. 625, 631 (2002). AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21


                       SUBSIDIARIES OF DELTA APPAREL, INC.

Listed below are the subsidiaries of Delta Apparel, Inc.:

(1)   M. J. Soffe Co., a North Carolina corporation.

(2)   Delta Apparel Honduras, S.A., a Honduran socieda anonima. 2,496 shares are
      owned by Delta Apparel, Inc. One (1) share is owned by each of four
      directors of Delta Apparel, Inc. Delta Apparel, Inc. has the right to
      acquire such director-owned shares at a nominal price. (At the time of the
      formation of Delta Apparel Honduras, S.A., Honduran law required a socieda
      anonima to have at least five shareholders.)

(3)   Delta Campeche, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican sociedad anonima de capital
      variable. 49 shares are owned by Delta Apparel, Inc. One (1) share is
      owned by Robert W. Humphreys. Delta Apparel, Inc. has the right to acquire
      the share owned by Robert W. Humphreys at a nominal price.

(4)   Delta Cortes, S.A., a Honduran socieda anonima. 2,499 shares are owned by
      Delta Apparel, Inc. One (1) share is owned by Robert W. Humphreys. Delta
      Apparel, Inc. has the right to acquire the share owned by Robert W.
      Humphreys at a nominal price. (Honduran law has changed since the
      formation of Delta Apparel Honduras, S.A. and now allows a socieda anonima
      to have only two shareholders.)

(5)   SAIM, LLC, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the
      State of North Carolina.
SERVED MARC H 3, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CJ SYSTEMS AVIATION GROUP, INC., 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09EA0020 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2009-0584 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER 

DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

Counsel for the Respondent has informed me that the parties have 

reached a settlement and that, as a result, the Respondent has withdrawn its 

request for a hearing. 

In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to § 13.215 of the 

Rules of Practice and procedure, 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, this proceeding is 

hereby dismissed with prejudice, and the docket is closed. 

The hearing scheduled for February 8, 2010 was cancelled. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP09EA0020 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL i& ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Robert P. Silverberg, Respondent's Counsel 

Silverberg Goldman & Bikoff, L.L.P. 

1101 30"^ Street, N.W., Suite 120 

Washington, DC 20007 

TEL: 202-944-3300 

FAX: 202-944-3306 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3273 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Order entered February 7 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00079
- CV
HEALTH TEXAS PROVIDE R NETWORK, MICHAEL M ACK, M.D., WILLIAM RYAN, M.D., DAVID BROWN, M.D. , KEVIN THELEMAN, M. D.

AND JOSE ESCOBAR, M. D., Appellant s

V. PATRICK ROUGHNEEN, M .D., CHERIE ROUGHNEE N AND PATRICK T. ROUGHNEEN , M.D., P.A., Appellee s On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 14 053



### O RDER
Befo re the Court is appellants’ January 23, 2019 unopposed motion to consolidat e this appeal with appellate cause number 05

- 18

- 00966

- CV , styled Baylor Scott & White Health , Baylor Medical Center at Grapevine, Ronald Jensen, D.O., Trent P ettijoh n, M.D., and Texas
H eart Hospital of the S outhwest L.L.P. d/b/a The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano v. Patrick Roughneen, M.D., Cherie Ro u ghneen and Patrick T. Ro u ghneen, M.D., P.A.

. Both appeals stem from the same underlying suit and challenge interlocutory orders denying motions to dismiss under chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The motions were heard on the same day, but the orders were signed five months apart.Appellants note in their motion that because the motions were heard o n the same date, the

two appeals share the same reporter’s record. They further note that the two appeals share substantially the same clerk’s record. If the two appeals are consolidated, appellants submit the clerk’s record would need to be supplemented only with a copy of their motion to dismiss and the order denying their motion.
We GRANT the motion and CONSOLIDATE this appeal into appellate cause number 05

- 18

- 00966

- CV. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer all documents from this appeal into appellate cause number 05

- 18

- 00966

- CV . For administrative purposes, this appeal is treated as a closed case. The parties , trial court clerk, and court reporter shall no w use only appellate cause number 05

- 18

- 00966

- CV. As appellants note in their motio n, briefing in appellate cause number 05

- 18

- 00966

- CV is complete and the appeal is awaiting submission. Accordingly, we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than February 12 , 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a c opy of appellants’ motion to dismiss and the trial court’s January 4, 2019 order denying the motion. We further ORDER appellants to file their brief on the merits no later than March 4, 2019.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and all parties. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE