alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.3
 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION
  I, Robert T. Peterson, certify that:
  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMERCO and U-Haul International, Inc.;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert T. Peterson
 Robert T. Peterson
 Chief Financial Officer of U-Haul International, Inc.
  Date: February 9, 2005
Submitted on record and briefs February 16,

reversed and remanded April 12, 1995

#### In the Matter of Mark Schafer, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*Mark SCHAFER, *Appellant.*

(MC94-17; CA A85310)

893 P2d 573

Elizabeth A. Stevenson and Morris & Associates, PC, filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Harrison Latto, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *State v. May,*131 Or App 570, 888 P2d 14 (1994); *State v. Allison,*129 Or App 47, 877 P2d 660 (1994).
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00343-CR

GEORGE WADE DUKES APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

Appellant George Wade Dukes attempts to appeal from his conviction for 

solicitation of sexual assault of a child under seventeen years of age, for which, 

pursuant to a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty and received three years’ 

confinement.

On August 19, 2010, this court sent the parties a letter stating that the trial 

court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal states that this is a plea-bargain 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

case and appellant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). We 

informed the parties that this appeal may be dismissed unless appellant or any 

party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before Monday, 

August 30, 2010, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We have received no response.

Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the appellate rules of procedure provides that in a pleabargain case, an appellant may appeal only “those matters that were raised by 

written motion filed and ruled on before trial” or “after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal.” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Here, appellant waived all 

pretrial motions, and the trial court has not given permission to appeal. Because 

the trial court certified that appellant possesses no right of appeal, we do not 

have jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want 

of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 14, 2010
#### § 50.6 Notification of final action.

The member or former member requesting the interview will be notified by letter of the final action taken in the case.

[CGFR 48-73, 13 FR 9333, Dec. 31, 1948, as amended by USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44279, July 27, 2015]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is schedule for June 15, 2000, at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the National Building Museum (Pension Building), Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20001-2728. Items of discussion will include designs for projects affecting the appearance of Washington, D.C., including buildings and parks.

Inquiries regarding the agenda and request to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

Dated in Washington, D.C., May 31, 2000.

Charles H. Atherton,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14756  Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
Rockingham

No. 78-104

#### Marie F. Dubois v. Antoine Dubois

September 18, 1978

*Fryer, Boutin & Warhall,*of Londonderry, by brief, for the plaintiff.

*Edward E. Williams,*of Exeter, by brief and orally, for the defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties were divorced in 1977 after a hearing before a Master *(Leonard C. Hardwick,*Esq.) by decree entered *by Perkins, J.*

Custody of a minor child was awarded to plaintiff who was also given the right to sole possession and occupancy of a real estate at 13 Asbury Street, Salem, until the child attained the age of eighteen or the plaintiff remarried, whichever event occurred first. The decree in paragraph 6 also provides that if the plaintiff “permits a man not her husband to reside with her at Asbury Street, her right of occupancy and possession shall immediately terminate.”

 Defendant thereafter moved that plaintiff’s custody of the child and possession of the property be terminated and that he be given custody and possession because of a violation by plaintiff of the above paragraph 6. Another Master, *Nicholas G. Copadis,*recommended that the request for custody and occupancy be denied and *579that the property be sold. The recommendation was approved by *Cann,*J.; defendant’s exceptions were transferred by *Mullavey,*J.

The violation of paragraph 6 of the decree is now moot because plaintiff is not now in occupancy. The matter of custody was not mentioned in paragraph 6 arid, contrary to the contention of the defendant, a violation of paragraph 6 would not of itself entitle him to custody.

*Exceptions overruled.*
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I,Richard Hadrill, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alliance GamingCorporation;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)   designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)   disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

a)   all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: February 9, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Richard Haddrill                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard Haddrill                       |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |
| (Principal Executive  Officer)         |

 

----
#### ROBERT MARTIN, as Executor, Appellant, *v.*CATHERINE N. E. HICKS, Respondent. CATHERINE N. E. HICKS, Respondent, *v.*ROBERT MARTIN, as Executor, Appellant.

*P&rpetuating testimony of witness*— right *of pa/rty.*

The perpetuation of the testimony of any witness within this State, by any party to o, suit, is a matter of right in cases wliere the facts required by the statute are shown to the proper court or officer, and the application appears to be made in good faith.

*239Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order made in the above entitled actions, to perpetuate the testimony of a witness.

*Joseph*Larocque, for appellant. *John A. Wright,*for respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Bradv and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Millennia  Tea Masters,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kevin Halter Jr., Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Kevin Halter Jr.
---------------------------
Kevin Halter Jr.
Principal Financial Officer

March 20, 2003
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10932 

Conference Calendar

__________________

STANLEY J. STEVENS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RANDY D. MCLEOD, Warden;

E. WILLIAMS, Assistant Warden,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CV-240

- - - - - - - - - -

December 19, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stevens appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Stevens argues on appeal

that the defendants violated his constitutional rights under the

First, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments by locking down

his unit for distribution of thermal underwear, for confining

inmates to their cells while staff meetings are held by prison

personnel, by constantly pestering and disturbing inmates while
No. 95-10932

-2-

transporting them to showers or the infirmary by making them

stand against the wall quietly, and by disturbing and

interrupting the inmates while they engage in recreational

activities. Stevens also alleges that solitary confinement and

prehearing detention prisoners are sometimes housed in his unit,

and that the inmates in the unit are forced to pack up and move

to make room.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Further, we find that Stevens'

appeal is frivolous, and accordingly, we DISMISS it pursuant to 

5th Cir. R. 42.2. Stevens was warned in Stevens v. Hay's

Pharmacy, No. 95-10119 (5th Cir. Apr. 14, 1995) that filing

future frivolous appeals would result in disciplinary sanctions. 

Accordingly, Stevens is hereby sanctioned in the amount of $100,

and he is BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil

appeal in this court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial

civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's

jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge

of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all

federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to

Stevens, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this

bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000004507
<NAME> ORANGE-CO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             479
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                       757
<INVENTORY>                                     57,012
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,315
<PP&E>                                         178,629
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,218
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,265
<SALES>                                         32,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,996
<CGS>                                           27,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,564
<INCOME-TAX>                                       989
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,575
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36741-36742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14602]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PEACE CORPS


Office of the Crisis Corps; Information Collection Requests Under 
OMB Review OMB Number 0420-0533

ACTION: Notice of public use form review request to the Office of 
Management and Budget.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Associate Director for Management invites comments on 
information collection requests as required pursuant to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This notice announces that the 
Peace Corps has submitted to the Office of

[[Page 36742]]

Management and Budget a request to approve the use of the peace Corps/
Crisis Corps Volunteer Application Form. The initial Federal Register 
notice, for a 60 day emergency approval, was published on March 3, 
2000. The Peace Corps is now seeking three year OMB approval using the 
standard review procedures. The Peace Corps invited comments on whether 
the proposed collection of information is necessary for proper 
performance of the functions of the Peace Corps, including whether the 
information will have practical use; the accuracy of the agency's 
estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, 
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; ways to 
enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and, ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, including through the use of 
automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of 
information technology. Comments on these forms should be addressed to 
Desk Officer for the Peace Corps, Office of Management and Budget, 
NEOB, Washington, DC 20503.

DATES: The Peace Corps invited comments for a period of 30 days 
following the initial publication in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the information collection may be obtained from 
Joan Timoney, Director of the Crisis Corps, Peace Corps, 1111 20th 
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20526. Ms. Timoney may be contacted by 
telephone at 202-692-2250. Comments on these forms should be addressed 
to Mr. Davis Rostker, Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, 
NEOB, Washington DC 20523.

    Dated: June 1, 2000.
Michael J. Kole,
Director of Administrative Services and Certifying Official.
[FR Doc. 00-14602 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6051-01-M