alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001101152
<NAME> ONLINE POWER SUPPLY, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,041,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                    63,253
<INVENTORY>                                     66,713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,116,908
<PP&E>                                         395,210
<DEPRECIATION>                                (69,906)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,702,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          566,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                         1,571
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,803,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,702,279
<SALES>                                        299,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               314,829
<CGS>                                          233,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,552,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,739
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                28,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,588,355)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,588,355)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,588,355)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glenn S. Johnson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge,





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











By    /s/Glenn S. Johnson


Glenn S.
Johnson


Chief
Financial Officer


May 7,
2010
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5155 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5155

   To provide that a certification of the cooperation of Mexico with 
 United States counterdrug efforts not be required in fiscal year 2001 
 for the limitation on assistance for Mexico under section 490 of the 
  Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 not to go into effect in that fiscal 
                                 year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2000

 Mr. Kolbe (for himself and Mr. Dreier) introduced the following bill; 
     which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that a certification of the cooperation of Mexico with 
 United States counterdrug efforts not be required in fiscal year 2001 
 for the limitation on assistance for Mexico under section 490 of the 
  Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 not to go into effect in that fiscal 
                                 year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COUNTERDRUG COOPERATION CERTIFICATION UNDER FOREIGN 
              ASSISTANCE OF 1961 NOT REQUIRED WITH RESPECT TO MEXICO IN 
              FISCAL YEAR 2001.

    Notwithstanding paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of section 
490 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291j), no 
certification shall be required under subsection (b) of that section 
with respect to Mexico in fiscal year 2001 in order that the 
limitations on bilateral assistance and multilateral assistance under 
subsection (a) of that section not apply to Mexico in fiscal year 2001.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATEPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFSARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, David A. Berg, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”), does hereby certifythat to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has causedthis instrument to be executed this 14th day of April, 2009.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ DAVID A. BERG                            |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: David A. Berg                          |   |
|   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

139837 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139837 

 COA: 292349 

Muskegon CC: 90-031833-FC 

WILLIAM DONNELL SAIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 28, 2020

No. 04-20-00422-CR

Matthew HOGAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR13464

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal has been filed in this appeal 

in which the trial court judge certifies that the underlying criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk 

file an electronic clerk’s record within ten days from the date of this order containing the 

following documents: 

 1. All pre-trial orders and the related pre-trial motions; 

2. The Court Admonishments, the Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of Testimony and Stipulations, 

and all other documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain; 

3. The judgment; 

4. All post-judgment motions and orders; 

5. The notice of appeal; 

6. The Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and 

7. The criminal docket sheet. 

 All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The 

clerk of this court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial 

court clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this 

appeal. 

FILE COPY
_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
§ 334.820 Lake Michigan; naval restricted area, U.S. Naval Training Center, Great Lakes, Ill. ( a ) *The area.* An area extending in a north and south direction from the Great Lakes, Illinois, south breakwater to an east-west line projecting eastward from the shore termination of the north fence of the U.S. Naval Training Center, Great Lakes, Illinois, and extending into Lake Michigan for a distance of one mile from the shoreline.
( b ) *The regulations.* No person or vessel of any kind, except those engaged in naval operations, shall enter, navigate, anchor, or moor in the restricted area without first obtaining permission to do so from the Commander, U.S. Naval Training Center, Great Lakes, Illinois, or his authorized representative.
[28 FR 319, Jan. 11, 1963. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17556, Apr. 10, 1997]
§ 261.4 Responsibility. ( a ) The Chief Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Officer, whose duties are performed by the Associate General Counsel and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, is responsible for: ( 1 ) Overseeing Postal Service compliance with the FOIA.
( 2 ) Making recommendations to the Postmaster General regarding the Postal Service's FOIA program.
( 3 ) Monitoring and reporting on FOIA implementation and performance for the Postal Service.
( b ) The Chief Privacy Officer, under the Associate General Counsel and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, is responsible for administering records and information management policies, and the privacy of information programs, and for the compliance of all handbooks, directives, and instructions in support of these policies and programs.
( c ) The Deputy Chief FOIA Officer, under the Privacy and Records Office, administers the Postal Service release of information program with the assistance of FOIA Coordinators in Headquarters departments and area and district offices.
( d ) Freedom of Information Act Public Liaisons are responsible for: ( 1 ) Managing FOIA Requester Service Centers (RSCs).
( 2 ) Receiving concerns of requesters about the service provided by the FOIA RSC following an initial response.
( 3 ) Ensuring a service-oriented response to requests and FOIA-related inquiries.
( 4 ) Reporting to the Chief FOIA Officer on their activities.
( e ) Freedom of Information Act Requester Service Centers are responsible for: ( 1 ) Facilitating communication between the Postal Service and FOIA requesters.
( 2 ) Providing information to requesters concerning the status of FOIA requests and information about responses to such requests.
( f ) Freedom of Information Act Coordinators fill an ad hoc position located within each Headquarters department, and Area and District office, and are responsible for: ( 1 ) Coordinating and tracking FOIA requests referred to or received by their functional or geographical area.
( 2 ) Providing procedural guidance, upon request, to records custodians.
( 3 ) Assisting the Deputy Chief FOIA Officer with national reporting activities, such as annual reporting of local FOIA and Privacy Act activities.
( g ) Records Custodians are responsible for ensuring that records within their facilities or organizations are managed according to Postal Service policies. Vice presidents or their designees are the custodians of records maintained at Headquarters. In the field, the Records Custodian is the head of a Postal Service facility such as an area, district, Post Office, or other Postal Service installation or designee that maintains Postal Service records. Senior medical personnel are the custodians of restricted medical records maintained within Postal Service facilities. The Custodian of Employee Assistance Program (EAP) records is the Postal Service counselor, a supplier, or the public health service, whichever provided the services.
( h ) Postal Service managers are responsible for administering records and information management policies and for complying with all handbooks, directives, and instructions in support of this policy.
[80 FR 45065, July 29, 2015]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-17-00362-CR

MATTHEW AYRTON SHIPP, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 432nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1485913D)

January 10, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel 

 Justice Lee Gabriel
-cr-06240-WPD Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2001 P
-cr-06240-WPD Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2001 P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5273 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5273

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the intention of the Congress with regard to the authority 
 of the United States Mint to produce numismatic coins, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Mint Numismatic Coin 
Clarification Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MINT'S AUTHORITY.

    (a) Silver Proof Coins.--Section 5132(a)(2)(B)(i) of title 31, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``paragraphs (1)'' and 
inserting ``paragraphs (2)''.
    (b) Platinum Coins.--Section 5112(k) of title 31, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``bullion'' and inserting ``platinum 
bullion coins''.

SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL REPORT REQUIREMENT.

    Section 5134(e)(2) of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``reflect'' and inserting ``contain'';
            (2) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (C);
            (3) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D) 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(E) a supplemental schedule detailing--
                            ``(i) the costs and expenses for the 
                        production, for the marketing, and for the 
                        distribution of each denomination of 
                        circulating coins produced by the Mint during 
                        the fiscal year and the per-unit cost of 
                        producing, of marketing, and of distributing 
                        each denomination of such coins; and
                            ``(ii) the gross revenue derived from the 
                        sales of each such denomination of coins.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5016

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

514 Express Center Drive in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘J.T. Weeker

Service Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. BLAGOJEVICH (for himself, Mr. HYDE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. RUSH,

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. CRANE, Ms.

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. PORTER, Mr. WELLER, Mr. COSTELLO, Mrs.

BIGGERT, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. EWING, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. EVANS, Mr.

LAHOOD, Mr. PHELPS, and Mr. SKIMKUS) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 514 Express Center Drive in Chicago,

Illinois, as the ‘‘J.T. Weeker Service Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. J.T. WEEKER SERVICE CENTER.

4 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The facility of the United

5 States Postal Service located at 514 Express Center Drive

6 in Chicago, Illinois, and known as the Chicago Inter-
2

•HR 5016 IH

1 national/Military Service Center, shall be known and des2 ignated as the ‘‘J.T. Weeker Service Center’’.

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘J.T. Weeker Service

7 Center’’.

Æ
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LARRY GILLIARD, a/k/a WILLIAM )

LARRY GILLIARD; and JEWEL )

GILLIARD, a/k/a SAMANTHA JEWEL )

GILLIARD, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2004

)

GELT FUNDING, LLP, a Florida )

limited liability partnership, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 9, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardee 

County; Marcus J. Ezelle, Judge.

Larry Gilliard and Jewel Gilliard, pro se. 

No appearance for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                9              
<MULTIPLIER>             1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>        9-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                  11,105,723
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                         5,620,155
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>            153,456,761
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                   153,456,761
<LOANS>                                288,340,212
<ALLOWANCE>                              3,392,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         474,904,427
<DEPOSITS>                             343,880,922
<SHORT-TERM>                            90,092,198
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                      7,175,129
<LONG-TERM>                                927,816
<COMMON>                                 7,824,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              25,004,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>         474,904,427
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         18,442,153
<INTEREST-INVEST>                        7,633,412
<INTEREST-OTHER>                           264,436
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        26,340,001
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       9,522,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      13,379,044
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   12,960,957
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           4,293
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                          9,840,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          5,182,039
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>               3,280,458
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             3,280,458
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 2.10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                3.97
<LOANS-NON>                                815,000
<LOANS-PAST>                             1,265,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                           613,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    0
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


November 1, 2019


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 449 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on October 31, 2019, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-233545) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1102

CHARLES W. PARKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Food

and Drug Division,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-92-269-5-H)

Submitted: April 23, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles W. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Giles Meacham, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

Appellee's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker

v. North Carolina Dep't of Agric., No. CA-92-269-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec.

18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED