alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 2, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D24

- 1548

Lower Tribunal No. F03

- 21018A



### David Brown,

Petitioner,

vs.



### The State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction

– Habeas Corpus.

David Brown, in proper person

.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General , for respondent.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.2 ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On September 4, 2024, this Court denied the Petitioner David Brown’s

Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. On the same date, the Court ordered

Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing further

pro se appeals, petitions, motions, or other pleadings in this Court relating to

lower tribunal case F03

- 21018A.

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s response to the order to show cause

and the successive, duplicative, pro se petitions and appeals brought by

Petitioner, we conclude that good cause has not been shown. Petitioner has

engaged in the filing of meritless, frivolous, and successive claims,

continuing to seek relief from this Court notwithstanding prior adverse

determinations on the merits. In case numbers 3D2017

- 1685 and 3D2017

-

1565, this Court affirmed the trial court’s order prohibiting Petitioner from

filing further pro se matters.

In accordance with State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999), and

Concepcion v. State

, 944 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), Petitioner, David

Brown, is prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, pleadings,

motions, or petitions relating to his conviction, judgment, and sentence in

lower tribunal case F03

- 21018A. We direct the Clerk of the Third District

Court of Appeal to refuse to accept any such papers relating to the circuit3 court case number unless they have been reviewed and signed by an

attorney who is a duly licensed member of The Florida Bar in good standing.

See Whipple v. State , 112 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Additionally, any such further and unauthorized pro se filings by

Petitioner, David Brown, may subject him to appropriate sanctions, including

the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Department of Corrections

for its consideration of disciplinary action, including the forfeiture of gain time.

See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2017).
§ 954.17 Transcript. ( a ) A contract reporter of the Postal Service under the supervision of the presiding officer shall report hearings. The reporter shall supply the parties with copies of the transcript at rates not to exceed those fixed by contract between the Postal Service and the reporter.
( b ) Changes in the official transcript may be made only when they involve substantial errors. A party may file a motion for correction of the official transcript within 10 days after his or her receipt of the transcript or any part thereof. Other parties shall, within such time as may be specified by the presiding officer, notify the presiding officer in writing if they object to the requested corrections. Failure of a party to interpose timely objection to a proposed correction may be considered by the presiding officer to be concurrence. The presiding officer shall then specify the corrections to be made in the transcript. He or she may on his or her own initiative order corrections in the transcript after notice to the parties subject to their objection.
[36 FR 11567, June 16, 1971, as amended at 62 FR 66998, Dec. 23, 1997]
#### § 52.81 Reading room and index.

After deleting only so much personal information as is necessary to prevent an unwarranted invasion of privacy of the applicant or other persons mentioned in the final decision of the Board, a redacted copy of each final decision shall be indexed by subject and made available for review and copying at a public reading room. Final decisions created on or after November 1, 1996, shall be made available by electronic means. 5 U.S.C. 552.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              | RELM Wireless Corporation |                                                        |
|-------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |                      |                                                        |   |
| November 10, 2010 | By:                       | William P. Kelly                                            |   |
|              |                      | Name: William P. Kelly                                 |   |
|              |                      | Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
#### § 101-26.506 Interior planning and design services.

In addition to the assistance provided in the selection of furniture and furnishings as specified in § 101-26.505-7, the GSA Public Buildings Service, through facilities located in each region, will assist Federal activities within the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands in various phases of interior planning and design. These services will be provided either directly or through commercial sources. (For services involving space layout, see § 101-17.400.)

[41 FR 42953, Sept. 29, 1976]
Exhibit 99.3

                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


This back-up  certification  is delivered in connection  with the  certification
provided by Hugh Harley, Group Executive Retail Banking Services of Commonwealth
Bank of Australia ("the Bank")  contained in Medallion Trust Series 2003 - 1G `s
annual reports filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the "SEC").
The  undersigned  hereby  certifies  to the  best  of his  knowledge  and  after
reasonable investigation that:

1.   I, Hugh Harley, am an employee of Commonwealth Bank of Australia;

2.   I, Hugh Harley,  am  responsible  for servicing  and reporting  function of
     Medallion Trust Series 2003-1G;

3.   I, Hugh Harley,  am responsible  for reviewing the activities  performed by
     the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement;

4.   Based upon the review required under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
     agreement,  and except as disclosed in the annual Reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement.



Date:  September 23, 2003



/S/ HUGH HARLEY
------------------------
Hugh Harley
Group Executive
Retail Banking Services
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
#### § 955.25 Transcript of proceedings.

Testimony and argument at hearings shall be reported verbatim, unless the Board otherwise orders. Transcripts of the proceedings will be provided to the parties by the Board.
§ 230.3 Cooperation with the Office of Inspector General. ( a ) All Postal Service employees shall cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General. Deliberately submitting information known to be false or misleading to the Office of Inspector General or failing to cooperate with all audits, reviews, and investigations conducted by the Office of Inspector General may be grounds for disciplinary or other legal action.
( b ) Any employee who has authority to take, direct another to take, recommend or approve any personnel action shall not retaliate against any employee as a reprisal for cooperating and assisting with any Office of Inspector General audit, review, or investigation (including reporting facts or information to the Office of Inspector General that leads to any audit, review, or investigation).
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14907]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Availability of Seats for the Olympic Coast National Marine 
Sanctuary Advisory Council

AGENCY: National Marine Sanctuary Program (NMSP) National Ocean Service 
(NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of 
Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Notice and request for application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary is seeking 
applicants for the education seat on its Sanctuary Advisory Council 
(Council). Applicants are chosen based upon their particular expertise 
and experience in relation to the seat for which they are applying; 
community and professional affiliations; philosophy regarding the 
conservation and management of marine resources; and the length of 
residence in the area affected by the Secretary. Applicants who are 
chosen as members should expect to serve a three-year term, pursuant to 
the Council's Charter.

DATES: Applications are due by July 15, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Application kits may be obtained by contacting: Nancy Beres, 
SAC Coordinator, Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary, 138 West 1st 
Street, Port Angeles, Washington, 98362. Completed applications should 
be sent to the same address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Beres, SAC Coordinator, Olympic 
Coast National Marine Sanctuary, 138 West 1st Street, Port Angeles, 
Washington, 98362. Telephone: (360) 457-66722 x 30 E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#452b242b263c6b2720372036052b2a24246b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec828d828f95c28e899e899fac82838d8dc28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary 
Advisory Council is comprised of nineteen representatives of various 
local and regional organizations and agencies whose role is to advise 
the Sanctuary Manager on matters of policy and in reviewing strategic 
plans.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. Section 1431 et seq.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary 
Program)

    Dated: June 8, 2000.
Ted Lillestolen,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone 
Management.
[FR Doc. 00-14907 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 101-25.302-2 Filing cabinets. Executive agencies shall make every effort to effect maximum use of filing cabinets and to limit the purchase of new equipment. Filing cabinets should be replaced only in accordance with the standards in subpart 101-25.4. Maximum utilization of equipment should be obtained by: ( a ) Disposing of all records that have been authorized for disposition by the Congress or, where such authorization has not been obtained, through the preparation and obtaining of authorized disposal schedules with the assistance of the National Archives and Records Administration.
( b ) Removing office supplies, publications, and other nonrecord material from filing cabinets to more suitable storage equipment, except where the quantity of such material is small (as a rule, less than half a cabinet).
( c ) Transferring to Federal Records Centers or approved agency records centers (to the extent that facilities are made available) inactive records not needed in daily business but not yet ready for disposal, when filing equipment can be released by such action.
( d ) Shifting less active files, not transferable to approved records centers, to fiberboard storage boxes, using filing cabinets only when files are constantly used.
( e ) Using filing cabinets with locks only when required by special needs that cannot be satisfied less expensively.
( f ) Using letter-size filing cabinets instead of legal-size whenever possible.
( g ) Using 5-drawer filing cabinets whenever available in lieu of 4-drawer cabinets.
[29 FR 15993, Dec. 1, 1964, as amended at 53 FR 11848, Apr. 11, 1988; 61 FR 14978, Apr. 4, 1996]
Exhibit 3.4





AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS

OF VALIDIAN CORPORATION





Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.1 of the Bylaws of Validian Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the Company), the Company adopts the following Amendment to its Bylaws.



The amendment to the Bylaws adds Section 8.1 of the Bylaws to read in its entirety as follows:



APPLICABILITY OF CONTROL SHARE ACT



8.1:  Applicability Of Control Share Act.  The provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes Sections 78.378 to 78.3792, inclusive, shall not apply to any acquisition of a controlling interest in the Company by any of the purchasers named in the Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 8, 2004 among the Company and the Purchasers named therein.



* * * * * *

























































---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Secretary of the Company hereby certifies that the above Amendment to Bylaws was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation as of March 8, 2004.







/s/ Bruce Benn



Bruce Benn, Secretary
Strafford

No. 7813

#### The State of New Hampshire v. William E. Martin

February 17, 1978

*David H. Souter,*attorney general *(Edward N. Damon,*assistant attorney general, orally), for the State.

*Fitzgerald & Sessler,*of Laconia *(Paul T. Fitzgerald*orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

Defendant was indicted for aggravated assault in violation of RSA 631:2. When the case was called for trial, defendant stated that he had no money and could not afford a lawyer. The court therefore appointed a lawyer who tried the case, which resulted in a guilty verdict. At sentencing, defendant stated he was “a little disappointed ... in my lawyer from Massachusetts not being here, although counsel, I think he did a marvelous job today in this case....”

*103He contended that a lawyer named Mavros from Massachusetts was counsel of his choice but that he failed to appear. Mavros represented defendant through the preliminary stages in the Rochester District Court, but the records of the superior court do not contain an appearance by him for defendant in that court.

After verdict, defendant filed a motion for a new trial on the ground that he was denied the right to counsel of his choice. This motion was denied by *Cann,*J., who transferred defendant’s exception.

When defendant stated that he had no money and could not afford a lawyer, it was proper for the court to appoint counsel for him. Defendant cannot now assert error on the part of the court based on an inconsistent position. *See State v. Laplante,*117 N.H. 417, 374 A.2d 643 (1977). The record before us does not compel a different result from that reached by the trial court.

*Exception overruled.*
Case 0:22-cv-62054-AHS Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 0:22-cv-62054-AHS Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2022 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
        99.3**
  **CONSENT
          OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
  We
          consent to the use of our reports dated November 27, 2006 with respect
          to the
          consolidated financial statements of Corus Entertainment Inc. (“Corus” or the
“Company”), Corus management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal
          control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control
          over
          financial reporting of the Company, included in its Annual Report on Form
          40-F
          for the year ended August 31, 2006.
   Toronto,
                  Canada,
              /S/Ernst
                  & Young LLPNovember
                  29, 2006.
              Chartered
                  Accountants
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5340

To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to the airport noise and

access review program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 2000

Mrs. KELLY (for herself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. GILMAN, Mrs. LOWEY, and Mr.

ENGEL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to the

airport noise and access review program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 47524(d) of title 49, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph

6 (5)(B);

7 (2) by striking the period at the end of para8 graph (6) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

9 (3) by inserting at the end the following:
2

•HR 5340 IH

1 ‘‘(7) a local restriction limiting the hours of op2 eration of an airport adopted by the airport operator

3 but disallowed by a court before 1985 if—

4 ‘‘(A) the airport operator adopted before

5 1985 a policy of encouraging voluntary limita6 tion of the hours of operation; and

7 ‘‘(B) the airport operator entered into an

8 agreement before 1985 with scheduled air car9 riers regulating the capacity of the airport ter10 minal.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

         The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Peoples Community Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



                                          /s/Jerry D. Williams
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Name: Jerry D. Williams
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 30, 2002
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 22-40742 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Kimberly Dawn Cavender, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:21-CR-133-4 

______________________________ 

Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Kimberly Dawn Cavender has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Cavender has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

April 27, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-40742 Document: 00516728840 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/27/2023
No. 22-40742 

2 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 22-40742 Document: 00516728840 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/27/2023
§ 3021.13 Deadlines for appeals. ( a ) *In general.* If the Postal Service has issued a final determination to close or consolidate a post office, an appeal is due within 30 days of the final determination being made available in conformance with § 3021.3(b).
( b ) *Appeals sent by mail.* If sent by mail, a Petition for Review must be postmarked no later than 30 days after the final determination has been made available.
( c ) *Appeals sent by other physical delivery.* If sent by some other form of physical delivery, a Petition for Review must be received in the Commission's Docket Section no later than 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the 30th day after the final determination has been made available.
( d ) *Appeals sent electronically.* If submitted electronically, a Petition for Review must be received in the Commission's Docket Section no later than 4:30 p.m., eastern time, on the 30th day after the final determination has been made available.
[77 FR 6679, Feb. 9, 2012, as amended at 85 FR 9655, Feb. 19, 2020]
<PAGE>



                                                                     EXHIBIT 11

                     ALBA-WALDENSIAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
          Calculation of Primary and Fully Dilutive Earnings Per Share
                                  (unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                 Three Month Period Ended       Nine Month Period Ended
                                       Oct.1,      Oct.2,          Oct.1,        Oct.2,
                                        1995        1994           1995          1994
<S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
Primary Earning Per Share
Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding .........     1,864,502   1,851,591     1,864,094       1,846,723
Net Income(Loss) ................   $  (728,743)   $792,208     $(639,238)    $ 1,682,209
Primary Earning Per Share .......   $    (.39)    $     .42     $    (.34)    $       .91
Fully Dilutive Earning Per Share
Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding ........     1,864,502   1,851,591     1,864,094      1,846,723
Common Stock Equivalents(Options)         9,811      37,591        14,835         36,670
                                      1,874,313   1,889,182     1,878,929      1,883,393
Net Income(Loss) ................   $  (728,743)  $792,208     $(639,238)  $   1,682,819
Fully dilutive Earnings Per Share   $      (.39)  $    .42     $    (.34)   $        .89
</TABLE>

                                       15
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5124

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

14 Municipal Way in Cherryfield, Maine, as the ‘‘Gardner C. Grant

Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 7, 2000

Mr. BALDACCI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 14 Municipal Way in Cherryfield, Maine, as

the ‘‘Gardner C. Grant Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GARDNER C. GRANT POST OFFICE.

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

5 Postal Service located at 14 Municipal Way in Cherryfield,

6 Maine, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Gardner

7 C. Grant Post Office’’.

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United
2

•HR 5124 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Gardner C. Grant

3 Post Office’’.

Æ