alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 187.319 Transfer of ownership by secured party's transfer statement. ( a ) In this section, “secured party's transfer statement” means a record signed by the secured party of record stating— ( 1 ) That there has been a default on an obligation secured by the vessel;
( 2 ) The secured party of record is exercising or has exercised post-default remedies with respect to the vessel;
( 3 ) By reason of the exercise, the secured party of record has the right to transfer the ownership interest of an owner, and the name of the owner;
( 4 ) The name and last known mailing address of the owner of record and the secured party of record;
( 5 ) The name of the transferee;
( 6 ) Other information required by § 187.307(b); and
( 7 ) One of the following: ( i ) The certificate of title is an electronic certificate;
( ii ) The secured party does not have possession of the written certificate of title created in the name of the owner of record; or
( iii ) The secured party is delivering the written certificate of title to the office with the secured party's transfer statement.
( b ) Unless the office rejects a secured party's transfer statement for a reason stated in § 187.308(c), not later than 20 days after delivery to the office of the statement and payment of fees and taxes payable under State law in connection with the statement or the acquisition or use of the vessel, the office must— ( 1 ) Accept the statement;
( 2 ) Amend the files of the office to reflect the transfer; and
( 3 ) If the name of the owner whose ownership interest is being transferred is indicated on the certificate of title— ( i ) Cancel the certificate even if the certificate has not been delivered to the office;
( ii ) Create a new certificate indicating the transferee as owner; and
( iii ) Deliver the new certificate or a record evidencing an electronic certificate.
( c ) An application under paragraph (a) of this section or the creation of a certificate of title under paragraph (b) of this section is not by itself a disposition of the vessel and does not by itself relieve the secured party of its duties under State law.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary is announcing a public meeting of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Group and a joint public hearing with the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council. 

# DATES:

The public hearing is July 19, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. and the public meeting is July 20 at 8:30 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Fourth floor conference room, 645 “G” Street, Anchorage, Alaska. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas Mutter, Department of the Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 1689 “C” Street, Suite 119, Anchorage, Alaska, (907) 271-5011. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Public Advisory Group was created by Paragraph V.A.4 of the Memorandum of                           ( print page 37406)                        Agreement and Consent Decree entered into by the United States of America and the State of Alaska on August 27, 1991, and approved by the United States District Court for the District of Alaska in settlement of                     *United States of America*                     v.                     *State of Alaska,*                     Civil Action No. A91-081 CV. The agenda for the public hearing is the proposed Fiscal Year 2001 Work Plan for the restoration of resources and services injured by the T/V Exxon Valdez oil spill of 1989. The public meeting agenda will feature a discussion of the Work Plan, as well as the status of habitat protection measures in the spill impact area, and plans for the long-term Gulf Ecosystem Monitoring Program.                 

Willie R. Taylor,

Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 00-14920 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-RG-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

NAME                                      STATE OF ORGANIZATION OR INCORPORATION

Digitas Inc.                              Delaware Corporation

Scitutate Acquisition Inc.                Delaware Corporation

Vesuvio, Inc.                             Delaware Corporation

Bronner Slosberg Humphry Co.              Massachusetts Business Trust

BSH Holding LLC                           Delaware Limited Liability Company

Digitas LLC                               Delaware Limited Liability Company

Sansome Inc.                              Massachusetts Corporation

Digitas (Europe) Inc.                     Massachusetts Corporation

Digitas International Inc.                Delaware Corporation

Digitas Asia Ltd                          Hong Kong Limited Company

Digitas Europe (Belgium) S.A.             Belgium S.A.

Digitas Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.        Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-1306EA

_____________

Lem Williams, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Garland Nelson, State Parole Officer, *

Little Rock, Arkansas, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: February 6, 1998

Filed: February 20, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Lem Williams, Jr., filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Garland Nelson, his

former state parole officer, claiming constitutional violations in connection with

Williams’s parole revocation, and seeking damages and release from custody. After the

entry of a clerk’s default against Nelson was set aside, the district court granted

Nelson’s motion to dismiss, and Williams apeals. Having carefully reviewed the record

and the parties’ briefs, we find no abuse of discretion in the grant of relief from default,

or in the denial of leave to file Williams’s amended complaint. We also conclude the

district court correctly granted Nelson’s motion to dismiss. To the extent Williams’s
-2-

claims were not barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), Williams did not

allege a compensable injury attributable to Nelson. See Heck, 512 U.S. at 487 n.7;

Jones v. Moore, 986 F.2d 251, 253 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). We affirm the district

court but modify the judgment to a dismissal without prejudice. See Schafer v. Moore,

46 F.3d 43, 45 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). Williams’s motion to consolidate this

appeal with his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 action is denied.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,056
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  523,672<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     87,531
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       2,525,474
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,173,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,213,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,123,562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     642,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,213,681
<SALES>                                         60,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               459,562
<CGS>                                           33,197
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  344,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   882
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,432
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,612
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,612
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.58
<FN>
<F1>THE VALUE FOR RECEIVABLES REPRESENTS THEIR AMOUNT NET OF THEIR ALLOWANCES.
<F2>AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET EXISTS IN THE REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5060

To amend title 49, United States Code, to waive federal preemption of

State law providing for the awarding of punitive damages against motor

carriers for engaging in unfair or deceptive trade practices in the processing of claims relating to loss, damage, injury, or delay in connection

with transportation of property in interstate commerce.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to waive federal

preemption of State law providing for the awarding of

punitive damages against motor carriers for engaging

in unfair or deceptive trade practices in the processing

of claims relating to loss, damage, injury, or delay in

connection with transportation of property in interstate

commerce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5060 IH

1 SECTION 1. STATE COURT AWARDS OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES

2 FOR UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE PRACTICES OF

3 MOTOR CARRIERS IN CONNECTION WITH

4 CLAIMS FOR LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY, OR

5 DELAY OF TRANSPORTED PROPERTY.

6 (a) PUNITIVE DAMAGES AUTHORIZED.—Section

7 14706 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by add8 ing at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(h) PUNITIVE DAMAGES FOR UNFAIR OR DECEP10 TIVE PRACTICES.—Nothing in this section limits the li11 ability of a carrier for punitive damages authorized under

12 applicable State law for any act or omission of the carrier

13 in connection with the investigation, settlement, adjudica14 tion, or other aspect of the processing of a claim under

15 this section that constitutes an unfair or deceptive trade

16 practice under such State law.’’.

17 (e) RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICA18 BILITY.—Subsection (h) of section 14706 of title 49,

19 United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), shall

20 take effect as of January 1, 1990, and shall apply with

21 respect to receipts and bills of lading referred to in sub22 section (a)(1) of such section that are issued on or after

23 that date.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

W ILLIAM SHAWN W ALDREP

,

Appellant,

v.

T HE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00027

- CR

Appeal from the

90 th Judicial District Court,

of Young County, Texas

(TC#11080)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17 TH DAY OF DECEMBER , 201 9

.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez

, and Palafox, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest's Southwest Montana Resource Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, September 14, 2011, from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m., in Dillon, Montana. The purpose of the meeting is to review funding proposals for Title II funding.

# DATES:

Wednesday, September 14, 2011, from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Beaverhead-Deerlodge Forest Headquarters located at 420 Barrett Street, Dillon, Montana (MT 59725).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Patty Bates, Committee Coordinator, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, 420 Barrett Street, Dillon, MT 59725,  (406) 683-3979; e-mail                         *pbates@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda for this meeting includes discussion about new project proposals seeking funding. The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee throughout the meeting.

 Dated: August 15, 2011.

David R. Myers,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 2011-21358 Filed 8-29-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
In the Senate of the United States,

October 11 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 5239) entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for increased

penalties for violations of the Export Administration Act of

1979, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 Section 20 of the Export Administration Act of 1979

2 (50 U.S.C. App. 2419) is amended by striking ‘‘August 20,

3 1994’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘August 20, 2001’’.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5239

AMENDMENT
EXHIBIT 10.17

                                  June 23, 2003

Dear Scott,

         By mutual consent,  this letter amendment  ("Letter  Amendment") amends
our prior  letter  agreement  dated  August 13, 2002  ("Letter  Agreement"),  as
follows:

         The fifth  paragraph of the Letter  Agreement  which begins "Should the
Company execute a definitive..." shall be deleted in its entirety.

         Any Change of Control (as defined within the Letter Agreement) shall be
subject to the  successor  entity  agreeing in writing to assume and be bound by
all  the  obligations  of  Virage,  Inc.  including  the  aforementioned  Letter
Agreement  and Letter  Amendment  (defined  herein),  to agree in writing to the
assignment of the Letter  Agreement,  as amended hereby,  to it, and to agree to
bind any subsequent successor entities to it to these same obligations.

         The Letter Agreement and Letter Amendment shall be governed by the laws
of the state of California and both parties agree to the exclusive  jurisdiction
in the state and federal  courts in San  Francisco,  California.  The prevailing
party in any legal  action or  proceeding  related to the Letter  Agreement  and
Letter  Amendment  shall  recover its  reasonable  attorneys'  fees  incurred in
connection therewith.

         All other terms and conditions of the Letter  Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.  Your signature below indicates your assent and agreement
to the terms and  conditions  of this  amendment  to the Letter  Agreement,  and
executes this amendment as of the date first set forth above.

                                                        Sincerely,

                                                        /s/ Paul G. Lego

                                                        Paul G. Lego
                                                        C.E.O. & Chairman
                                                        Virage, Inc.

Agreed to and Accepted by:

Scott Gawel

/s/  Scott Gawel
------------------------------
Signature


June 23, 2003
------------------------------
Date
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Information","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"h73LC0gaQZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/information\/\">Information<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/information\/embed\/#?secret=h73LC0gaQZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Information” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"h73LC0gaQZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
§ 3040.175 Review. The Commission shall review the Postal Service reply and public comment. The Commission shall either: ( a ) Approve the proposal to modify the market dominant and competitive product lists, but only to the extent the modification is consistent with the position of the Postal Service;
( b ) Withdraw the proposal;
( c ) Institute further proceedings to consider the proposal, identifying relevant issues that may require further development; or
( d ) Direct other action as the Commission may consider appropriate.
[72 FR 63698, Nov. 9, 2007. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
BRIAN LAMANS HUGHES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2614

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 1, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Lee, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 27, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40148

KEVIN NIXON; BRANDON ANCELET

Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

BURYL WHEATLEY; PD GEORGE COMPANY

Defendants - Appellees

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont

No. 1:05-CV-51

--------------------

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

“A party must reserve its right to appeal prejudgment

rulings in the offer of judgment, otherwise no appeals from

judgment will be allowed.” Ramming v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.

of Am., 390 F.3d 366, 370 (5th Cir. 2004) (emphasis in original). 

Plaintiffs’ failure to do so here extinguished their right to

appeal, and their subsequent statement purporting to reserve this

right could not resurrect it.
2

The Motion to Dismiss the Case is GRANTED. Appeal

DISMISSED. Costs shall be borne by plaintiffs.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*



     In connection with the Amendment No.1 to Annual Report of SiVault Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Emilian Elefteratos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                              /s/ Emilian Elefteratos
                                              --------------------------
Dated:  October 28, 2004                      Emilian  Elefteratos,
                                              Chief Executive Officer