alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Improving Fuel Efficiency of Weapons Platforms will meet in closed session on June 10-21 at Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center, 9500 MacArthur Boulevard, West Bethesda, MD 20817-5700.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting, The Task Force will review fuel-efficient technologies, including new or improved fuels, engines, Alternative Fueled Vehicles, and other advanced technologies and assess their operational, logistical, cost, and environmental impacts for a range of practical implementation scenarios.

Due to critical mission requirements in finalizing briefings for this Task Force, there is insufficient time to provide timely notice required by section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and Subsection 101-.6.1015(g) of the GSA Final Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR part 101-6, which further requires publication at least 15 calendar days prior to the meeting of the Task Force on June 20-21, 2000.

Persons interested in further information should call Commander Brain D. Hughes, USN, at (703) 695-4157.

Dated: June 12, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-15220  Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
§ 3020.116 Discovery—in general. ( a ) *Purpose.* The rules in this subpart allow discovery that is reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence during a proceeding. The notice and scheduling order issued pursuant to § 3020.110 shall provide that discovery will be scheduled to end at least three days prior to the commencement of hearings.
( b ) *Informal discovery.* The discovery procedures in this section and §§ 3020.117 through 3020.119 are not exclusive. Participants are encouraged to engage in informal discovery whenever possible to clarify exhibits and testimony. The results of these efforts may be introduced into the record by stipulation, or by other appropriate means. In the interest of reducing motion practice, participants also are expected to use informal means to clarify questions and to identify portions of discovery requests considered overbroad or burdensome.
( c ) *Failure to obey orders or rulings.* If a participant fails to obey an order of the Commission or ruling of presiding officer to provide or permit discovery pursuant to this section or §§ 3020.117 through 3020.119, the Commission or the presiding officer may issue orders or rulings in regard to the failure as are just. These orders or rulings may, among other things: ( 1 ) Direct that certain designated facts are established for the purposes of the proceeding;
( 2 ) Prohibit a participant from introducing certain designated matters in evidence;
( 3 ) Strike certain evidence, requests, pleadings, or parts thereof; or
( 4 ) Such other relief as the Commission deems appropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 13, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14767]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[WV-6013b; FRL-6714-3]


Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for 
Designated Facilities and Pollutants; West Virginia; Control of 
Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve the West Virginia hospital/
medical/infectious waste incinerator (HMIWI) 111(d)/129 plan submitted 
on August 18, 1999 by the West Virginia Division of Environmental 
Protection (WV DEP), and the subsequent plan amendment of April 19, 
2000. The plan establishes emission limitations for existing HMIWIs, 
and provides for the implementation and enforcement of those 
limitations. In the final rules section of today's Federal Register, 
EPA is approving the plan. A detailed rationale for the approval is set 
forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in 
response to that rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation 
to this rule. If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct 
final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be 
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this rule. EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by July 13, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Makeba A. Morris, Chief, Technical 
Assessment Branch, Mailcode 3AP22, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James B. Topsale at (215) 814-2190, or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#295d46595a48454c07434044694c5948074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88fce7f8fbe9e4eda6e2e1e5c8edf8e9a6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the direct 
final rule, of the same title, which is located in the rules section of 
the Federal Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: June 1, 2000.
Bradley M. Campbell,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region III.
[FR Doc. 00-14767 Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RETURN OFSERVICE

Case; Court: County: Job:

22-a -23543- UNITED STATESDISTRICTCOURTSOUTHERN SOUTHERN DISTRIG OFFLORIDA 8224D 0

ALTMAN DISTRICTOFFLORIDA

Plaintiff/Petitioner: Defendant/Respondent:

MALVIN GARNET YASM IN MO RSHEDIAN etal.

Receivedby: For:

OneServeLegal,LLC MalvinGamett

Tobeservedupon:

LesiePuzo

ReceivedbyOneServeLegal,LLConJanuary5,2023at1(k51am tobeservedonLesiePuzoat1175NE125thStreet#618,Miami,FL33181.

1,QaisarAndersondoherebyaffirm thatonJanuary24,2023at10:43am,1:

SubstituteservedatruecopyoftheOrderInCasesWithMultipleDefendants,AmendedComplaintForviolationOfCivilRights,Verified

Complaint-DemandForluryTrial,withthedateandhourofserviceendoHedthereonbyme,to:LesiePuzoat1175NE125thStreet#618,

Miami,FL33181andacceptedbyKlaraFerminanemployeewhostatedtheyareauthorizedtoacceptandinformedsaidpersonofthe

contentstherein,incompliancewiths'tatestatutesF.S.4Kû31(1)and48.08,1

IcertifythatIam overtheageof18,havenointerestintheaboveaction,andam authorized,ingoodstanding,intheludicialCircuitin

whichtheprocesswasserved.

Underpenaltiesofperjury,ldeclarethatlhavereadtheforgoingdocumentandthatthefactsstatedinitaretrue.Notarynotrequired

pursuanttoFloridaStatutes92.52542).

RecipientNam e/Address:

MannerofService:

Docum enu:

KtaraFerm inat1175NE125th Street#618,Miami,FL33181

Authorized,January24,2023,10:43am EST

OrderInCasesWithMultipleDefendants,AmendedComplaintForViolationOfCivilRights,Verified

Complaint-DemandForluryTrial(ReceivedJanuary5,2023at10:51am EST)

AdditionalCom m ents:

1)SuccessfulAttempt:January24,2023,10:43am ESTat1175NE125thStreet#618,Miami,FL33181receivedbyKlaraFermin.Age:40's;

Ethnicity:AfricanAmerican;GendecFemale;Height'.5'41*HaicBlack;Relationship'.Authorizedemployee;Otherreceptionsaidshehad

authorizationtoaccept

01/25/20J.3

QaisarAnderson Date

2273

OneServeLegal,LLC

32NE151R REET

Miami,Fl33162

786-527..4165

j;r./ vjn...- snqg .; w..x j'-''jl:....jy....ft.j(;)j....j4,j jy..jt...,j,

* j

.1tA.'1h1. /z7wgt0..'k3 j

i..td -'1 '. '

(...L.t.:i.:..t.tx.;(..,.'.t..t,.'T,',

V..'.'*.3.i.'.).t'.)'4..1t,','.r..-h,,.';.tih..J.'.',j '

Case 1:22-cv-23543-RKA Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2023 Page 1 of 1
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5302

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

at 1010 Fifth Avenue in Seattle, Washington, asthe ‘‘William Kenzo Nakamura United StatesCourthouse’’.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5302

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 1010

Fifth Avenue in Seattle, Washington, as the ‘‘William

Kenzo Nakamura United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5302 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 1010 Fifth

3 Avenue in Seattle, Washington, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘William Kenzo Nakamura United States

5 Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘William Kenzo Nakamura United States Court11 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 17,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 115-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2023   Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Safer Shot, Inc. for the period ended, September 30, 2009, (the "Report")
I, John Lund, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Safer Shot, Inc.



Date:    January 12, 2010             /s/John Lund
                             -------------------------------------------
                                         John Lund
                                         President
                                   (Principal Executive)
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09565

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

09565\09565_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09565\09565_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09565\09565_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09565\09565_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09565\09565_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09565\09565_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09565\09565_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09565\09565_Certification Statement Form.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09565\Supporting Documentation\09565_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09565\09565_Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09565\09565_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09565\09565_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09565\09565_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### Murray *v.*Tarver.

Lumpkin, J.

Whether or not the act of 1904 (Acts 1904, p. 93), entitled “An act to recognize, foster, encourage, protect and aid the Georgia Industrial Home and other child-saving institutions in this State, and for other purposes,” is subject to any of the attacks made upon it on constitutional grounds, the mother of the child committed to the Indus*379trial Home was not a party to tlie proceeding, and could not bring to this court a judgment of commitment, for review, by bill of exceptions. If any rights of hers with respect to the child have been invaded, habeas corpus or some other appropriate proceeding may furnish her a remedy; but not direct exception to the order passed by the judge of the superior court under that act.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided January 17, 1907.

Motion to dismiss writ of error.

*L. W. Nelson*and *E. M. Davis,*for plaintiff in error.

I. *J. Hofmayer,*contra.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, concept Fish, C. J.,*absent„
531 P.2d 1179

#### KIDWELL & HEISER, a partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy FENLEY, an Individual, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 11647.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Feb. 21, 1975.

Peter E. Heiser, Jr., Kidwell & Heiser, Boise, for plaintiff-appellant.

No appearance for defendant-respondent Roy Fenley.

PER CURIAM:

This case presents the question of whether an attorney who brings suit against a client to recover unpaid attorney fees owed to him by the client may also recover reasonable attorney fees for bringing that action.

Defendant-respondent Roy Fenley was represented by the law firm of plaintiff-appellant, Kidwell & Heiser, a law partnership. Fenley was billed for the services the partnership had performed for him, but he never paid any of the amount due. Kidwell & Heiser brought suit against him, praying for judgment in the amount of the unpaid attorney fees, costs and for attorney fees for bringing the suit. The trial court allowed the first two items, but disallowed the attorney fees. This appeal was taken with respect to the attorney fees.

Since the early case of Jenkins v. Commercial National Bank, 19 Idaho 290, 113 P. 463 (1911), and as recently as Mecham v. Nelson, 92 Idaho 783, 451 P.2d 529 (1969), this Court has adhered to the rule that a successful litigant is not entitled to recover attorney fees for the cost of bringing an action unless such recovery is provided by statute or contract between the parties. *See also*National Motor Service Co. v. Walters, 85 Idaho 349, 379 P.2d 643 (1963); Financial Credit Corp. v. Douglas, 71 Idaho 312, 230 P.2d 1002 (1951); English v. King, 39 Idaho 531, 228 P. 325 (1924). There is dicta in Jenkins v. Commercial National Bank, *supra,*indicating that there are exceptions in which the court may award attorney fees other than those provided by statute or agreement. Appellant suggests that this Court should expand the exception to make it the general rule. However, assuming that we have such authority, we do not deem this to be the appropriate case in which to exercise it and award attorney fees.

Judgment affirmed. Respondent not appearing, no costs are allowed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-81294-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

________________________________/

JOINT MOTION TO UNSEAL

REDACTED GLOBAL ISSUES BRIEFS FILED UNDER SEAL

The United States of America and Plaintiff Donald J. Trump jointly move this Court 

to unseal their redacted briefs to the Special Master concerning certain “global issues” 

identified in the course of the Special Master’s review process. See Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 171, 

173. D.E. 171 is the redacted version of the Plaintiff’s memorandum, while D.E. 173 is the 

redacted version of the government’s memorandum. Both filings can be unsealed and made 

available on the public docket because the parties have redacted any information covered by 

the Special Master’s Protective Order. D.E. 113, ¶ 3. Also, each party has reviewed the other 

party’s proposed redacted filing and has no objection to the other party’s proposed redactions.

WHEREFORE, the United States and Plaintiff Donald J. Trump respectfully request

that the Clerk of Court shall UNSEAL and file on the public docket Docket Entries 171 and 

173.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 174 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted,

On behalf of the United States

/s Juan Antonio Gonzalez

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Florida Bar No. 897388

99 NE 4th Street, 8th Floor

Miami, FL 33132

Tel: 305-961-9001

Email: juan.antonio.gonzalez@usdoj.gov

On behalf of the Plaintiff, Donald J. Trump:

/s James M. Trusty

JAMES M. TRUSTY

Ifrah Law PLLC

CHRISTOPHER M. KISE

Chris Kise & Associates, P.A.

LINDSEY HALLIGAN

M. EVAN CORCORAN 

Silverman, Thompson, Slutkin, White, LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 9, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices of 

Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.

s/ Juan Antonio Gonzalez

Juan Antonio Gonzalez

United States Attorney

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 174 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5110 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5110

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street 
 in Riverside, California, as the ``George E. Brown, Jr. United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 2000

   Mr. Calvert (for himself, Mr. Lewis of California, Mrs. Bono, Mr. 
    Packard, and Mr. Baca) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street 
 in Riverside, California, as the ``George E. Brown, Jr. United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street in 
Riverside, California, shall be known and designated as the ``George E. 
Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``George E. 
Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Feather Valley Financial,  Ltd.
on Form  10-KSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Raul
Castro, President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Raul Castro
Raul Castro
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  SiVault  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-KSB  for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wayne
Taylor,  Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.


                                                 /s/ Wayne  Taylor
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Wayne  Taylor,
                                                 Interim Chief Financial Officer
Dated:  October  12,  2004


                                      E-138
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)   In connection with the Annual Report of Health Enhancement Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Gorman, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date: April 15, 2011 /s/ John Gorman John Gorman Executive Vice President  A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.