```

[House Report 115-708]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

115th Congress   }                                      {      Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session      }                                      {     115-708

======================================================================

 
                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2018

                                _______
                                

  June 1, 2018.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Shuster, from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                         [To accompany H.R. 8]

    The Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, to whom 
was referred the bill (H.R. 8) to provide for improvements to 
the rivers and harbors of the United States, to provide for the 
conservation and development of water and related resources, 
and for other purposes, having considered the same, report 
favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill 
as amended do pass.

                                CONTENTS

                                                                   Page
Purpose of the Legislation.......................................    23
Background and Need for the Legislation..........................    23
Hearings.........................................................    27
Legislative History and Consideration............................    27
Committee Votes..................................................    29
Committee Oversight Findings.....................................    32
New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures and Congressional 
  Budget Office Cost Estimate....................................    32
Performance Goals and Objectives.................................    32
Advisory of Earmarks.............................................    32
Duplication of Federal Programs..................................    32
Disclosure of Directed Rulemakings...............................    33
Federal Mandate Statement........................................    33
Preemption Clarification.........................................    33
Advisory Committee Statement.....................................    33
Applicability of Legislative Branch..............................    33
Section-by-Section Analysis of Legislation.......................    33
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported............    40

    The amendment is as follows:
  Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the 
following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

  (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2018''.
  (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Secretary defined.

                      TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 101. Sense of Congress regarding water resources development 
bills.
Sec. 102. Use of Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund to support navigation.
Sec. 103. Assessment of harbors and inland harbors.
Sec. 104. Levee safety initiative reauthorization.
Sec. 105. Dam safety.
Sec. 106. Rehabilitation of Corps of Engineers constructed dams.
Sec. 107. Forecast-informed reservoir operations.
Sec. 108. Identification of nonpowered dams for hydropower development.
Sec. 109. Emergency response to natural disasters.
Sec. 110. Integrated water resources planning.
Sec. 111. Mitigation banks.
Sec. 112. Indian Tribes.
Sec. 113. Columbia River.
Sec. 114. Dissemination of information.
Sec. 115. Non-Federal engagement and review.
Sec. 116. Comprehensive backlog report.
Sec. 117. Structures and facilities constructed by Secretary.
Sec. 118. Transparency in administrative expenses.
Sec. 119. Study of the future of the United States Army Corps of 
Engineers.
Sec. 120. Acknowledgment of credit.
Sec. 121. Non-Federal implementation pilot program.
Sec. 122. Study of water resources development projects by non-Federal 
interests.
Sec. 123. Construction of water resources development projects by non-
Federal interests.
Sec. 124. Advanced funds for water resources development studies and 
projects.
Sec. 125. Funding to process permits.
Sec. 126. Study on economic and budgetary analyses.
Sec. 127. Study of corrosion management at Corps of Engineers projects.
Sec. 128. Costs in excess of Federal participation limit.
Sec. 129. Report on innovative materials.
Sec. 130. Study on Corps of Engineers.
Sec. 131. GAO study.
Sec. 132. GAO report on Alaska Native village relocation efforts due to 
flooding and erosion threats.
Sec. 133. Study and report on expediting certain waiver processes.
Sec. 134. Corps of Engineers continuing authorities program.
Sec. 135. Credit in lieu of reimbursement.
Sec. 136. Lake Okeechobee regulation schedule review.
Sec. 137. Missouri River.
Sec. 138. Access to real estate data.
Sec. 139. Aquatic invasive species research.
Sec. 140. Harmful algal bloom technology demonstration.
Sec. 141. Bubbly Creek, Chicago ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 142. Operation and maintenance of navigation and hydroelectric 
facilities.
Sec. 143. Hurricane and storm damage reduction.
Sec. 144. Post-disaster watershed assessments in the territories of the 
United States.

                           TITLE II--STUDIES

Sec. 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies.
Sec. 202. Additional studies.
Sec. 203. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects.

   TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS, MODIFICATIONS, AND RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects.
Sec. 302. Backlog prevention.
Sec. 303. Project modifications.
Sec. 304. Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Sec. 305. Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.
Sec. 306. Conveyances.
Sec. 307. Clatsop County, Oregon.
Sec. 308. Kissimmee River Restoration, Central and Southern Florida.
Sec. 309. Lytle and Cajon Creeks, California.
Sec. 310. Yuba River Basin, California.

                TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE

Sec. 401. Project authorizations.

SEC. 2. SECRETARY DEFINED.

  In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Army.

                      TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 101. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT 
                    BILLS.

  It is the sense of Congress that, because the missions of the Corps 
of Engineers for navigation, flood control, beach erosion control and 
shoreline protection, hydroelectric power, recreation, water supply, 
environmental protection, restoration, and enhancement, and fish and 
wildlife mitigation benefit all Americans, and because water resources 
development projects are critical to maintaining the country's economic 
prosperity, national security, and environmental protection, Congress 
should consider a water resources development bill not less often than 
once every Congress.

SEC. 102. USE OF HARBOR MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND TO SUPPORT NAVIGATION.

  (a) Availability of Amounts.--Section 210 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238) is amended--
          (1) in the section heading by striking ``authorization of 
        appropriations'' and inserting ``funding for harbor 
        navigation'';
          (2) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) as 
        subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and
          (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
  ``(c) Use of Collected Funds in Fiscal Year 2029 and Thereafter.--
          ``(1) Use of funds.--In addition to amounts appropriated 
        under subsections (a) and (b), there shall be available to the 
        Secretary, out of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, without 
        further appropriation, for fiscal year 2029 and each fiscal 
        year thereafter, such sums as may be necessary to carry out the 
        purposes of subsection (a)(2).
          ``(2) Availability of amounts.--Amounts made available under 
        this subsection shall remain available until expended.''.
  (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 210 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238) is further amended--
          (1) in subsection (d)(2)(A)(i) (as redesignated by subsection 
        (a)(2) of this section) by striking ``subsection (e)'' and 
        inserting ``subsection (f)'';
          (2) in subsection (e)(3)(B)(i) (as redesignated by subsection 
        (a)(2) of this section) by striking ``subsection (c)(2)(A)'' 
        and inserting ``subsection (d)(2)(A)''; and
          (3) in subsection (f)(2)(A)(ii) (as redesignated by 
        subsection (a)(2) of this section) by striking ``subsection 
        (d)(2)'' and inserting ``subsection (e)(2)''.

SEC. 103. ASSESSMENT OF HARBORS AND INLAND HARBORS.

  Subsection (f) of section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2238), as redesignated by section 102, is amended--
          (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``shall assess the'' and 
        inserting ``shall assess, and issue a report to Congress on, 
        the''; and
          (2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following:
                  ``(C) Opportunities for beneficial use of dredged 
                materials.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the 
                Secretary shall identify potential opportunities for 
                the beneficial use of dredged materials obtained from 
                harbors and inland harbors referred to in subsection 
                (a)(2), including projects eligible under section 1122 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 
                Stat. 1645; 33 U.S.C. 2326 note).''.

SEC. 104. LEVEE SAFETY INITIATIVE REAUTHORIZATION.

   Title IX of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 
3301 et seq.) is amended--
          (1) in section 9005(g)(2)(E)(i), by striking ``2015 through 
        2019'' and inserting ``2019 through 2023''; and
          (2) in section 9008, by striking ``2015 through 2019'' each 
        place it appears and inserting ``2019 through 2023''.

SEC. 105. DAM SAFETY.

  Section 14 of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467j) is 
amended by striking ``2015 through 2019'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``2019 through 2023''.

SEC. 106. REHABILITATION OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTED DAMS.

  Section 1177 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 
U.S.C. 467f-2 note) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (e), by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$40,000,000''; and
          (2) in subsection (f), by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$40,000,000''.

SEC. 107. FORECAST-INFORMED RESERVOIR OPERATIONS.

  (a) Report on Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations.--Not later than 
one year after the date of completion of the forecast-informed 
reservoir operations research study pilot program at Coyote Valley Dam, 
Russian River Basin, California (authorized by the River and Harbor Act 
of 1950 (64 Stat. 177)), the Secretary shall issue a report to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate on the results of the study pilot program.
  (b) Contents of Report.--The Secretary shall include in the report 
issued under subsection (a)--
          (1) an analysis of the use of forecast-informed reservoir 
        operations at Coyote Valley Dam, California;
          (2) an assessment of the viability of using forecast-informed 
        reservoir operations at other dams owned or operated by the 
        Secretary;
          (3) an identification of other dams owned or operated by the 
        Secretary where forecast-informed reservoir operations may 
        assist the Secretary in the optimization of future reservoir 
        operations; and
          (4) any additional areas for future study of forecast-
        informed reservoir operations.

SEC. 108. IDENTIFICATION OF NONPOWERED DAMS FOR HYDROPOWER DEVELOPMENT.

  (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this section, the Secretary shall develop a list of existing 
nonpowered dams owned and operated by the Corps of Engineers that have 
the greatest potential for hydropower development.
  (b) Considerations.--In developing the list under subsection (a), the 
Secretary may consider the following:
          (1) The compatibility of hydropower generation with existing 
        purposes of the dam.
          (2) The proximity of the dam to existing transmission 
        resources.
          (3) The existence of studies to characterize environmental, 
        cultural, and historic resources relating to the dam.
          (4) Whether hydropower is an authorized purpose of the dam.
  (c) Availability.--The Secretary shall provide the list developed 
under subsection (a) to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make such list 
available to the public.

SEC. 109. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO NATURAL DISASTERS.

  (a) In General.--Section 5(a)(1) of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 
U.S.C. 701n(a)(1)) is amended in the first sentence--
          (1) by striking ``strengthening, raising, extending, or other 
        modification thereof'' and inserting ``strengthening, raising, 
        extending, realigning, or other modification thereof''; and
          (2) by striking ``structure or project damaged or destroyed 
        by wind, wave, or water action of other than an ordinary nature 
        to the design level of protection when, in the discretion of 
        the Chief of Engineers,'' and inserting ``structure or project 
        damaged or destroyed by wind, wave, or water action of other 
        than an ordinary nature to either the pre-storm level or the 
        design level of protection, whichever provides greater 
        protection, when, in the discretion of the Chief of 
        Engineers,''.
  (b) Duration.--Section 156(e) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5f(e)) is amended by striking ``6 years'' and 
inserting ``9 years''.

SEC. 110. INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES PLANNING.

   In carrying out a water resources development feasibility study, the 
Secretary shall consult with local governments in the watershed covered 
by such study to determine if local water management plans exist, or 
are under development, for the purposes of stormwater management, water 
quality improvement, aquifer recharge, or water reuse.

SEC. 111. MITIGATION BANKS.

  (a) Definition of Mitigation Bank.--In this section, the term 
``mitigation bank'' has the meaning given that term in section 332.2 of 
title 33, Code of Federal Regulations.
  (b) Guidance.--The Secretary shall issue guidance on the use of 
mitigation banks to meet requirements for water resources development 
projects in order to update mitigation bank credit release schedules 
to--
          (1) support the goal of achieving efficient permitting and 
        maintaining appropriate environmental protections; and
          (2) promote increased transparency in the use of mitigation 
        banks.
  (c) Requirements.--The guidance issued under subsection (b) shall--
          (1) be consistent with--
                  (A) part 230 of title 40, Code of Federal 
                Regulations;
                  (B) section 906 of the Water Resources Development 
                Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283);
                  (C) part 332 of title 33, Code of Federal 
                Regulations; and
                  (D) section 314(b) of the National Defense 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108-
                136; 33 U.S.C. 1344 note); and
          (2) provide for--
                  (A) the mitigation bank sponsor to provide sufficient 
                financial assurances to ensure a high level of 
                confidence that the compensatory mitigation project 
                will be successfully completed, in accordance with 
                applicable performance standards, under section 
                332.3(n) of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations;
                  (B) the mitigation bank sponsor to reserve the share 
                of mitigation bank credits required to ensure 
                ecological performance of the mitigation bank, in 
                accordance with section 332.8(o) of title 33, Code of 
                Federal Regulations; and
                  (C) all credits except for the share reserved under 
                subparagraph (B) to be available upon completion of the 
                construction of the mitigation bank.

SEC. 112. INDIAN TRIBES.

  (a) Cost Sharing Provisions for the Territories and Indian Tribes.--
Section 1156(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2310(a)(2)) is amended by striking ``section 102 of the 
Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 5130)'' 
and inserting ``section 4(e) of the Indian Self-Determination and 
Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304(e))''.
  (b) Written Agreement Requirement for Water Resources Projects.--
Section 221(b)(1) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``a federally recognized Indian tribe 
and, as defined in section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
(43 U.S.C. 1602), a Native village, Regional Corporation, and Village 
Corporation'' and inserting ``an Indian tribe, as defined in section 
4(e) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 
U.S.C. 5304(e))''.

SEC. 113. COLUMBIA RIVER.

  (a) Bonneville Dam, Oregon.--Section 1178(c)(1)(A) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1675) is amended by 
striking ``may provide assistance'' and inserting ``may provide 
assistance, which may include housing and related improvements,''.
  (b) John Day Dam, Washington and Oregon.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall, not later than 180 days 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, and in consultation 
        with the Secretary of the Interior, conduct a study to 
        determine the extent to which Indian Tribes have been displaced 
        as a result of the construction of the John Day Dam, Columbia 
        River, Washington and Oregon, as authorized by section 204 of 
        the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 179), including an 
        assessment of effects related to housing and related 
        improvements.
          (2) Additional actions.--If the Secretary determines, based 
        on the study under paragraph (1), that assistance is required, 
        the Secretary may use all existing authorities of the Secretary 
        to provide assistance, which may include housing and related 
        improvements, to Indian Tribes displaced as a result of the 
        construction of the John Day Dam, Columbia River, Washington 
        and Oregon.
          (3) Repeal.--Section 1178(c)(2) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1675) is repealed.
  (c) The Dalles Dam, Washington and Oregon.--The Secretary, in 
consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall complete a 
village development plan for any Indian Tribe displaced as a result of 
the construction of the Dalles Dam, Columbia River, Washington and 
Oregon, as authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 
(64 Stat. 179).

SEC. 114. DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION.

  (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
          (1) Congress plays a central role in identifying, 
        prioritizing, and authorizing vital water resources 
        infrastructure activities throughout the United States.
          (2) The Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 
        (Public Law 113-121) established a new and transparent process 
        to review and prioritize the water resources development 
        activities of the Corps of Engineers with strong congressional 
        oversight.
          (3) Section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and 
        Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) requires the 
        Secretary to develop and submit to Congress each year a Report 
        to Congress on Future Water Resources Development and, as part 
        of the annual report process, to--
                  (A) publish a notice in the Federal Register that 
                requests from non-Federal interests proposed 
                feasibility studies and proposed modifications to 
                authorized water resources development projects and 
                feasibility studies for inclusion in the report; and
                  (B) review the proposals submitted and include in the 
                report those proposed feasibility studies and proposed 
                modifications that meet the criteria for inclusion 
                established under such section 7001.
          (4) Congress will use the information provided in the annual 
        Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development to 
        determine authorization needs and priorities for purposes of 
        water resources development legislation.
          (5) To ensure that Congress can gain a thorough understanding 
        of the water resources development needs and priorities of the 
        United States, it is important that the Secretary take 
        sufficient steps to ensure that non-Federal interests are made 
        aware of the new annual report process, including the need for 
        non-Federal interests to submit proposals during the 
        Secretary's annual request for proposals in order for such 
        proposals to be eligible for consideration by Congress.
  (b) Dissemination of Process Information.--The Secretary shall 
develop, support, and implement education and awareness efforts for 
non-Federal interests with respect to the annual Report to Congress on 
Future Water Resources Development required under section 7001 of the 
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), 
including efforts to--
          (1) develop and disseminate technical assistance materials, 
        seminars, and guidance on the annual process as it relates to 
        non-Federal interests;
          (2) provide written notice to local elected officials and 
        previous and potential non-Federal interests on the annual 
        process and on opportunities to address local water resources 
        challenges through the missions and authorities of the Corps of 
        Engineers;
          (3) issue guidance for non-Federal interests to assist such 
        interests in developing proposals for water resources 
        development projects that satisfy the requirements of such 
        section 7001; and
          (4) provide, at the request of a non-Federal interest, 
        assistance with researching and identifying existing project 
        authorizations and Corps of Engineers decision documents.

SEC. 115. NON-FEDERAL ENGAGEMENT AND REVIEW.

  (a) Public Notice.--
          (1) In general.--Prior to developing and issuing any new or 
        revised implementation guidance for a covered water resources 
        development law, the Secretary shall issue a public notice 
        that--
                  (A) informs potentially interested non-Federal 
                stakeholders of the Secretary's intent to develop and 
                issue such guidance; and
                  (B) provides an opportunity for interested non-
                Federal stakeholders to engage with, and provide input 
                and recommendations to, the Secretary on the 
                development and issuance of such guidance.
          (2) Issuance of notice.--The Secretary shall issue the notice 
        under paragraph (1) through a posting on a publicly accessible 
        website dedicated to providing notice on the development and 
        issuance of implementation guidance for a covered water 
        resources development law.
  (b) Stakeholder Engagement.--
          (1) Input.--The Secretary shall allow a minimum of 60 days 
        after issuance of the public notice under subsection (a) for 
        non-Federal stakeholders to provide input and recommendations 
        to the Secretary, prior to finalizing implementation guidance 
        for a covered water resources development law.
          (2) Outreach.--The Secretary may, as appropriate (as 
        determined by the Secretary), reach out to non-Federal 
        stakeholders and circulate drafts of implementation guidance 
        for a covered water resources development law for informal 
        feedback and recommendations.
  (c) Development of Guidance.--When developing implementation guidance 
for a covered water resources development law, the Secretary shall take 
into consideration the input and recommendations received from non-
Federal stakeholders, and make the final guidance available to the 
public on-line on a publicly accessible website.
  (d) Covered Water Resources Development Law.--In this section, the 
term ``covered water resources development law'' means--
          (1) the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014;
          (2) the Water Resources Development Act of 2016;
          (3) this Act; and
          (4) any Federal water resources development law enacted after 
        the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 116. COMPREHENSIVE BACKLOG REPORT.

  Section 1001(b)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 579a(b)(4)) is amended--
          (1) in the header, by inserting ``and operation and 
        maintenance'' after ``backlog'';
          (2) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as follows:
                  ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall compile and 
                publish--
                          ``(i) a complete list of all projects and 
                        separable elements of projects of the Corps of 
                        Engineers that are authorized for construction 
                        but have not been completed; and
                          ``(ii) a list of major Federal operation and 
                        maintenance needs of projects and properties 
                        under the control of the Corps of Engineers.'';
          (3) in subparagraph (B)--
                  (A) in the heading, by inserting ``backlog'' before 
                ``information''; and
                  (B) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
                ``subparagraph (A)'' and inserting ``subparagraph 
                (A)(i)'';
          (4) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D) and 
        inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
                  ``(C) Required operation and maintenance 
                information.--The Secretary shall include on the list 
                developed under subparagraph (A)(ii), for each project 
                and property under the control of the Corps of 
                Engineers on that list--
                          ``(i) the authority under which the project 
                        was authorized or the property was acquired by 
                        the Corps of Engineers;
                          ``(ii) a brief description of the project or 
                        property;
                          ``(iii) an estimate of the Federal costs to 
                        meet the major operation and maintenance needs 
                        at the project or property; and
                          ``(iv) an estimate of unmet or deferred 
                        operation and maintenance needs at the project 
                        or property.''; and
          (5) in subparagraph (D), as so redesignated--
                  (A) in clause (i), in the matter preceding subclause 
                (I), by striking ``Not later than 1 year after the date 
                of enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary shall 
                submit a copy of the list'' and inserting ``For fiscal 
                year 2019, and biennially thereafter, in conjunction 
                with the President's annual budget submission to 
                Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United 
                States Code, the Secretary shall submit a copy of the 
                lists''; and
                  (B) in clause (ii), by striking ``list'' and 
                inserting ``lists''.

SEC. 117. STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES CONSTRUCTED BY SECRETARY.

  Section 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 408) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
  ``(d) Work Defined.--For the purposes of this section, the term 
`work' shall not include unimproved real estate owned or operated by 
the Secretary as part of a water resources development project if the 
Secretary determines that modification of such real estate would not 
affect the function and usefulness of the project.''.

SEC. 118. TRANSPARENCY IN ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

  Section 1012(b)(1) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2315a(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``The 
Secretary'' and inserting ``Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018, the 
Secretary''.

SEC. 119. STUDY OF THE FUTURE OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF 
                    ENGINEERS.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the 
National Academy of Sciences to convene a committee of experts to carry 
out a comprehensive study on--
          (1) the ability of the Corps of Engineers to carry out its 
        statutory missions and responsibilities, and the potential 
        effects of transferring the functions (including regulatory 
        obligations), personnel, assets, and civilian staff 
        responsibilities of the Secretary relating to civil works from 
        the Department of Defense to a new or existing agency or 
        subagency of the Federal Government, including how such a 
        transfer might affect the Federal Government's ability to meet 
        the current statutory missions and responsibilities of the 
        Corps of Engineers; and
          (2) improving the Corps of Engineers' project delivery 
        processes, including recommendations for such improvements, 
        taking into account factors including--
                  (A) the effect of the annual appropriations process 
                on the ability of the Corps of Engineers to efficiently 
                secure and carry out contracts for water resources 
                projects and perform regulatory obligations;
                  (B) the effect that the current Corps of Engineers 
                leadership and geographic structure at the division and 
                district levels has on its ability to carry out its 
                missions in a cost-effective manner; and
                  (C) the effect of the frequency of rotations of 
                senior leaders of the Corps of Engineers and how such 
                frequency affects the function of the district.
  (b) Considerations.--The study carried out under subsection (a) shall 
include consideration of--
          (1) effects on the national security of the United States;
          (2) the ability of the Corps of Engineers to maintain 
        sufficient engineering capability and capacity to assist 
        ongoing and future operations of the United States armed 
        services; and
          (3) emergency and natural disaster response obligations of 
        the Federal Government that are carried out by the Corps of 
        Engineers.
  (c) Consultation.--The agreement entered into under subsection (a) 
shall require the National Academy to, in carrying out the study, 
consult with--
          (1) the Department of Defense, including the Secretary of the 
        Army and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works;
          (2) the Department of Transportation;
          (3) the Environmental Protection Agency;
          (4) the Department of Homeland Security;
          (5) the Office of Management and Budget;
          (6) other appropriate Federal agencies;
          (7) professional and nongovernmental organizations; and
          (8) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
        House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
        Public Works of the Senate.
  (d) Submission to Congress.--The Secretary shall submit the final 
report of the National Academy containing the findings of the study 
carried out under subsection (a) to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate not later than 2 years after 
the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 120. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CREDIT.

  Section 7007(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 
Stat. 1277; 128 Stat. 1226) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``Notwithstanding section 221(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)(C)(i)), the Secretary may 
provide credit for work carried out during the period beginning on 
November 8, 2007, and ending on the date of enactment of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2018 by the non-Federal interest for a 
project under this title if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project and was carried out in accordance with the laws 
specified in section 5014(i)(2)(A) of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1331) and all other applicable 
Federal laws.''.

SEC. 121. NON-FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PILOT PROGRAM.

  Section 1043(b)(8) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note(b)(8)) is amended by striking ``2015 
through 2019'' and inserting ``2019 through 2023''.

SEC. 122. STUDY OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
                    INTERESTS.

  Section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2231) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting ``federally 
        authorized'' before ``feasibility study'';
          (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows:
  ``(c) Submission to Congress.--
          ``(1) Review and submission of studies to congress.--Not 
        later than 180 days after the date of receipt of a feasibility 
        study of a project under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall 
        submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
        Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
        of the House of Representatives a report that describes--
                  ``(A) the results of the Secretary's review of the 
                study under subsection (b), including a determination 
                of whether the project is feasible;
                  ``(B) any recommendations the Secretary may have 
                concerning the plan or design of the project; and
                  ``(C) any conditions the Secretary may require for 
                construction of the project.
          ``(2) Limitation.--The completion of the review by the 
        Secretary of a feasibility study that has been submitted under 
        subsection (a)(1) may not be delayed as a result of 
        consideration being given to changes in policy or priority with 
        respect to project consideration.''; and
          (3) by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:
  ``(e) Review and Technical Assistance.--
          ``(1) Review.--The Secretary may accept and expend funds 
        provided by non-Federal interests to undertake reviews, 
        inspections, certifications, and other activities that are the 
        responsibility of the Secretary in carrying out this section.
          ``(2) Technical assistance.--At the request of a non-Federal 
        interest, the Secretary shall provide to the non-Federal 
        interest technical assistance relating to any aspect of a 
        feasibility study if the non-Federal interest contracts with 
        the Secretary to pay all costs of providing such technical 
        assistance.
          ``(3) Limitation.--Funds provided by non-Federal interests 
        under this subsection shall not be eligible for credit under 
        subsection (d) or reimbursement.
          ``(4) Impartial decisionmaking.--In carrying out this 
        section, the Secretary shall ensure that the use of funds 
        accepted from a non-Federal interest will not affect the 
        impartial decisionmaking of the Secretary, either substantively 
        or procedurally.''.

SEC. 123. CONSTRUCTION OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY NON-
                    FEDERAL INTERESTS.

  Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2232) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (b)--
                  (A) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding 
                subparagraph (A), by inserting ``federally authorized'' 
                before ``water resources development project'';
                  (B) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting ``, except as 
                provided in paragraph (3)'' before the semicolon; and
                  (C) by adding at the end the following:
          ``(3) Permit exception.--
                  ``(A) In general.--For a project described in 
                subsection (a)(1) or subsection (a)(3), or a separable 
                element thereof, with respect to which a written 
                agreement described in subparagraph (B) has been 
                entered into, a non-Federal interest that carries out a 
                project under this section shall not be required to 
                obtain any Federal permits or approvals that would not 
                be required if the Secretary carried out the project or 
                separable element unless significant new circumstances 
                or information relevant to environmental concerns or 
                compliance have arisen since development of the project 
                recommendation.
                  ``(B) Written agreement.--For purposes of this 
                paragraph, a written agreement shall provide that the 
                non-Federal interest shall comply with the same legal 
                and technical requirements that would apply if the 
                project or separable element were carried out by the 
                Secretary, including all mitigation required to offset 
                environmental impacts of the project or separable 
                element as determined by the Secretary.
                  ``(C) Certifications.--Notwithstanding subparagraph 
                (A), if a non-Federal interest carrying out a project 
                under this section would, in the absence of a written 
                agreement entered into under this paragraph, be 
                required to obtain a certification from a State under 
                Federal law to carry out the project, such 
                certification shall still be required if a written 
                agreement is entered into with respect to the project 
                under this paragraph.''; and
          (2) in subsection (d)--
                  (A) in paragraph (3)--
                          (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; 
                        and'' and inserting a semicolon;
                          (ii) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking the 
                        period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                          (iii) by adding at the end the following:
                  ``(C) in the case of reimbursement, appropriations 
                are provided by Congress for such purpose.''; and
                  (B) in paragraph (5)--
                          (i) by striking ``flood damage reduction'' 
                        each place it appears and inserting ``water 
                        resources development'';
                          (ii) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``for a 
                        discrete segment of a'' and inserting ``for 
                        carrying out a discrete segment of a federally 
                        authorized''; and
                          (iii) in subparagraph (D), in the matter 
                        preceding clause (i), by inserting ``to be 
                        carried out'' after ``project''.

SEC. 124. ADVANCED FUNDS FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES AND 
                    PROJECTS.

  (a) Contributions by States and Political Subdivisions for Immediate 
Use on Authorized Flood-Control Work; Repayment.--The Act of October 
15, 1940 (54 Stat. 1176; 33 U.S.C. 701h-1) is amended--
          (1) by striking ``a flood-control project duly adopted and 
        authorized by law'' and inserting ``a federally authorized 
        water resources development project,'';
          (2) by striking ``such work'' and inserting ``such project'';
          (3) by striking ``from appropriations which may be provided 
        by Congress for flood-control work'' and inserting ``if 
        appropriations are provided by Congress for such purpose''; and
          (4) by adding at the end the following: ``For purposes of 
        this Act, the term `State' means the several States, the 
        District of Columbia, the commonwealths, territories, and 
        possessions of the United States, and Indian tribes (as defined 
        in section 4(e) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education 
        Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304(e))).''.
  (b) No Adverse Effect on Processes.--In implementing any provision of 
law that authorizes a non-Federal interest to provide, advance, or 
contribute funds to the Secretary for the development or implementation 
of a water resources development project (including sections 203 and 
204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231, 
2232), section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), and the 
Act of October 15, 1940 (33 U.S.C. 701h-1)), the Secretary shall 
ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that the use by a non-
Federal interest of such authorities does not adversely affect--
          (1) the process or timeline for development and 
        implementation of other water resources development projects by 
        other non-Federal entities that do not use such authorities; or
          (2) the process for including such projects in the 
        President's annual budget submission to Congress under section 
        1105(a) of title 31, United States Code.
  (c) Advances by Private Parties; Repayment.--Section 11 of the Act of 
March 3, 1925 (Chapter 467; 33 U.S.C. 561) is repealed.

SEC. 125. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

  Section 214(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2352(a)) is amended--
          (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``10 years'' and inserting 
        ``12 years''; and
          (2) in paragraph (5)--
                  (A) by striking ``4 years after the date of enactment 
                of this paragraph'' and inserting ``December 31, 
                2022''; and
                  (B) by striking ``carry out a study'' and inserting 
                ``carry out a followup study''.

SEC. 126. STUDY ON ECONOMIC AND BUDGETARY ANALYSES.

  (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the 
National Academy of Sciences to--
          (1) carry out a study on the economic principles and 
        analytical methodologies currently used by or applied to the 
        Corps of Engineers to formulate, evaluate, and budget for water 
        resources development projects; and
          (2) make recommendations to Congress on potential changes to 
        such principles and methodologies to improve transparency, 
        return on Federal investment, cost savings, and prioritization, 
        in the formulation, evaluation, and budgeting of such projects.
  (b) Considerations.--The study under subsection (a) shall include--
          (1) an analysis of the current economic principles and 
        analytical methodologies used by or applied to the Corps of 
        Engineers in determining the total benefits and total costs 
        during the formulation of, and plan selection for, a water 
        resources development project;
          (2) an analysis of improvements or alternatives to how the 
        Corps of Engineers utilizes the National Economic Development, 
        Regional Economic Development, Environmental Quality, and Other 
        Social Effects accounts developed by the Institute for Water 
        Resources of the Corps of Engineers in the formulation of, and 
        plan selection for, such projects;
          (3) an analysis of whether such principles and methodologies 
        fully account for all of the potential benefits of project 
        alternatives, including any reasonably associated benefits of 
        such alternatives that are not contrary to law, Federal policy, 
        or sound water resources management;
          (4) an analysis of whether such principles and methodologies 
        fully account for all of the costs of project alternatives, 
        including potential societal costs, such as lost ecosystem 
        services, and full lifecycle costs for such alternatives; and
          (5) an analysis of the methodologies utilized by the Federal 
        Government in setting and applying discount rates for benefit-
        cost analyses used in the formulation, evaluation, and 
        budgeting of Corps of Engineers water resources development 
        projects.
  (c) Publication.--The agreement entered into under subsection (a) 
shall require the National Academy of Sciences to, not later than 30 
days after the completion of the study--
          (1) submit a report containing the results of the study and 
        the recommendations to the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; and
          (2) make a copy of such report available on a publicly 
        accessible website.
  (d) Sense of Congress on Budgetary Evaluation Metrics and 
Transparency.--It is the sense of Congress that the President, in the 
formulation of the annual budget request for the U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers (Civil Works), should submit to Congress a budget that--
          (1) aligns the assessment of the potential benefit-cost ratio 
        for budgeting water resources development projects with that 
        used by the Corps of Engineers during project plan formulation 
        and evaluation pursuant to section 80 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-17); and
          (2) demonstrates the transparent criteria and metrics 
        utilized by the President in the evaluation and selection of 
        water resources development projects included in the budget 
        request.

SEC. 127. STUDY OF CORROSION MANAGEMENT AT CORPS OF ENGINEERS PROJECTS.

  (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
the Senate a study of corrosion management efforts at projects and 
properties under the control of the Corps of Engineers.
  (b) Requirements.--The study under subsection (a) shall include--
          (1) an analysis of--
                  (A) asset management protocols that are utilized by 
                the Corps of Engineers, including protocols that 
                examine both asset integrity and the integration of 
                corrosion management efforts within the asset 
                lifecycle, which includes the stages of design, 
                manufacturing and construction, operation and 
                maintenance, and decommissioning;
                  (B) available corrosion prevention technologies that 
                may be used at projects and properties under the 
                control of the Corps of Engineers;
                  (C) corrosion-related asset failures and the 
                management protocols of the Corps of Engineers to 
                incorporate lessons learned from such failures into 
                work and management practices;
                  (D) training of Corps of Engineers employees with 
                respect to, and best practices for, identifying and 
                preventing corrosion at projects and properties under 
                the control of the Corps of Engineers; and
                  (E) the estimated costs and anticipated benefits, 
                including safety benefits, associated with the 
                integration of corrosion management efforts within the 
                asset lifecycle; and
          (2) a description of Corps of Engineers, stakeholder, and 
        expert perspectives on the effectiveness of corrosion 
        management efforts to reduce the incidence of corrosion at 
        projects and properties under the control of the Corps of 
        Engineers.

SEC. 128. COSTS IN EXCESS OF FEDERAL PARTICIPATION LIMIT.

  Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r) is 
amended by inserting ``, and if such amount is not sufficient to cover 
the costs included in the Federal cost share for a project, as 
determined by the Secretary, the non-Federal interest shall be 
responsible for any such costs that exceed such amount'' before the 
period at the end.

SEC. 129. REPORT ON INNOVATIVE MATERIALS.

  Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that describes activities 
conducted by the Corps of Engineers at centers of expertise, technology 
centers, technical centers, research and development centers, and 
similar facilities and organizations relating to the testing, research, 
development, identification, and recommended uses for innovative 
materials in water resources development projects.

SEC. 130. STUDY ON CORPS OF ENGINEERS.

  Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a 
report that--
          (1) describes the capacity and preparedness of the Corps of 
        Engineers workforce, including challenges related to diversity, 
        recruitment, retention, retirements, credentialing, 
        professional development, on-the-job training, and other 
        readiness-related gaps in ensuring a fully prepared 21st 
        century Corps of Engineers workforce; and
          (2) contains an assessment of the existing technology used by 
        the Corps of Engineers, the effects of inefficiencies in the 
        Corps' current technology usage, and recommendations for 
        improved technology or tools to accomplish its missions and 
        responsibilities.

SEC. 131. GAO STUDY.

  (a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit 
to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives a study of the consideration by the Corps of Engineers 
of natural features and nature-based features in the study of the 
feasibility of projects for flood risk management, hurricane and storm 
damage reduction, and ecosystem restoration.
  (b) Considerations.--The study under subsection (a) shall include--
          (1) a description of guidance or instructions issued, and 
        other measures taken, by the Secretary and the Chief of 
        Engineers to consider natural features and nature-based 
        features in project feasibility studies;
          (2) an assessment of the costs, benefits, impacts, and trade-
        offs associated with natural features and nature-based features 
        recommended by the Secretary for flood risk reduction, 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, and ecosystem restoration 
        projects, and the effectiveness of those natural features and 
        nature-based features;
          (3) a description of any statutory, fiscal, regulatory, or 
        other policy barriers to the appropriate consideration and use 
        of a full array of natural features and nature-based features; 
        and
          (4) any recommendations for changes to statutory, fiscal, 
        regulatory, or other policies to improve the use of natural 
        features and nature-based features by the Corps of Engineers.
  (c) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``natural feature'' and 
``nature-based feature'' have the meanings given such terms in section 
1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a).

SEC. 132. GAO REPORT ON ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGE RELOCATION EFFORTS DUE TO 
                    FLOODING AND EROSION THREATS.

  (a) Definition of Alaska Native Village.--In this section, the term 
``Alaska Native village'' means a Native village that has a Village 
Corporation (as those terms are defined in section 3 of the Alaska 
Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602)).
  (b) Report.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
submit to Congress a report on efforts to relocate Alaska Native 
villages due to flooding and erosion threats that updates the report of 
the Comptroller General entitled ``Alaska Native Villages: Limited 
Progress Has Been Made on Relocating Villages Threatened by Flooding 
and Erosion'', dated June 2009.
  (c) Inclusions.--The report under subsection (b) shall include--
          (1) a summary of flooding and erosion threats to Alaska 
        Native villages throughout the State of Alaska, based on 
        information from--
                  (A) the Corps of Engineers;
                  (B) the Denali Commission; and
                  (C) any other relevant sources of information as the 
                Comptroller General determines to be appropriate;
          (2) the status of efforts to relocate Alaska Native villages 
        due to flooding and erosion threats; and
          (3) any other issues relating to flooding and erosion threats 
        to, or relocation of, Alaska Native villages, as the 
        Comptroller General determines to be appropriate.

SEC. 133. STUDY AND REPORT ON EXPEDITING CERTAIN WAIVER PROCESSES.

  Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall complete and submit to the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report based on the 
results of a study on the best options available to the Secretary to 
implement the waiver process for the non-Federal cost share under 
section 116 of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Public Law 111-85; 123 Stat. 2851).

SEC. 134. CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM.

  Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) is 
amended--
          (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``$50,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$62,500,000''; and
          (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$12,500,000''.

SEC. 135. CREDIT IN LIEU OF REIMBURSEMENT.

  Section 1022 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 
2014 (33 U.S.C. 2225) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1022. CREDIT IN LIEU OF REIMBURSEMENT.

  ``(a) Requests for Credits.--With respect to an authorized flood 
damage reduction project, or separable element thereof, that has been 
constructed by a non-Federal interest under section 211 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13), or an authorized 
coastal navigation project that has been constructed by the Corps of 
Engineers pursuant to section 11 of the Act of March 3, 1925, before 
the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018, 
the Secretary may provide to the non-Federal interest, at the request 
of the non-Federal interest, a credit in an amount equal to the 
estimated Federal share of the cost of the project or separable 
element, in lieu of providing to the non-Federal interest a 
reimbursement in that amount.
  ``(b) Application of Credits.--At the request of the non-Federal 
interest, the Secretary may apply such credit to the share of the cost 
of the non-Federal interest of carrying out other flood damage 
reduction and coastal navigation projects or studies.''.

SEC. 136. LAKE OKEECHOBEE REGULATION SCHEDULE REVIEW.

  The Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers, shall expedite 
completion of the Lake Okeechobee regulation schedule to coincide with 
the completion of the Herbert Hoover Dike project, and may consider all 
relevant aspects of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan 
described in section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2680).

SEC. 137. MISSOURI RIVER.

  (a) IRC Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
regarding the impacts of interception-rearing complex construction on 
the navigation, flood control, and other authorized purposes set forth 
in the Missouri River Master Manual, and on the population recovery of 
the pallid sturgeon.
  (b) No Additional IRC Construction.--Until the report under 
subsection (a) is submitted, no additional interception-rearing complex 
construction is authorized.

SEC. 138. ACCESS TO REAL ESTATE DATA.

  (a) In General.--As soon as is practicable, using available funds, 
the Secretary shall make publicly available, including on a publicly 
accessible website, information relating to all real property with 
respect to which the Corps of Engineers holds an interest. The 
information shall include standardized real estate plat descriptions 
and geospatial information.
  (b) Limitation.--Nothing in this section may be construed to compel 
or authorize the disclosure of data or other information determined by 
the Secretary to be confidential, privileged, national security, or 
personal information, or information the disclosure of which is 
otherwise prohibited by law.

SEC. 139. AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES RESEARCH.

  (a) In General.--As part of the ongoing activities of the Engineer 
Research and Development Center to address the spread and impacts of 
aquatic invasive species, the Secretary shall undertake research on the 
management and eradication of aquatic invasive species, including Asian 
carp and zebra mussels.
  (b) Locations.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
work with Corps of Engineers district offices representing diverse 
geographical regions of the continental United States that are impacted 
by aquatic invasive species, such as the Atlantic, Pacific, and Gulf 
coasts and the Great Lakes.
  (c) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
recommending a plan to address the spread and impacts of aquatic 
invasive species.

SEC. 140. HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary, acting through the Engineer Research 
and Development Center of the Chief of Engineers, shall implement a 5-
year harmful algal bloom technology development demonstration under the 
Aquatic Nuisance Research Program. To the extent practicable, the Corps 
of Engineers shall support research that will identify and develop 
improved strategies for early detection, prevention, and management 
techniques and procedures to reduce the occurrence and effects of 
harmful algal blooms in the Nation's water resources.
  (b) Scalability Requirement.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
technologies identified, tested, and deployed under the harmful algal 
bloom program technology development demonstration have the ability to 
scale up to meet the needs of harmful-algal-bloom-related events.

SEC. 141. BUBBLY CREEK, CHICAGO ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

  The Secretary shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to facilitate 
ecosystem restoration activities at the South Fork of the South Branch 
of the Chicago River (commonly known as Bubbly Creek).

SEC. 142. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION AND HYDROELECTRIC 
                    FACILITIES.

  (a) In General.--Section 314 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2321) is amended--
          (1) in the heading by inserting ``navigation and'' before 
        ``hydroelectric facilities'';
          (2) in the first sentence, by striking ``Activities currently 
        performed'' and inserting the following:
  ``(a) In General.--Activities currently performed'';
          (3) in subsection (a) (as designated by paragraph (2)), by 
        inserting ``navigation or'' before ``hydroelectric'';
          (4) in the second sentence, by striking ``This section'' and 
        inserting the following:
  ``(b) Major Maintenance Contracts Allowed.--This section''; and
          (5) by adding at the end the following:
  ``(c) Exclusion.--This section does not--
          ``(1) apply to a navigation facility that was under contract 
        on or before the date of enactment of this subsection with a 
        non-Federal interest to perform operations or maintenance; and
          ``(2) prohibit the Secretary from contracting out commercial 
        activities after the date of enactment of this subsection at a 
        navigation facility.''.
  (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents contained in section 
1(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4604) is 
amended by striking the item relating to section 314 and inserting the 
following:

``Sec. 314. Operation and maintenance of navigation and hydroelectric 
facilities.''.

SEC. 143. HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION.

  Section 156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 
1962d-5f) is amended in subsection (b)--
          (1) by striking ``Notwithstanding'' and inserting the 
        following:
          ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding''; and
          (2) by adding at the end the following:
          ``(2) Timing.--The 15 additional years under paragraph (1) 
        shall begin on the date of initiation of construction of 
        congressionally authorized nourishment.''.

SEC. 144. POST-DISASTER WATERSHED ASSESSMENTS IN THE TERRITORIES OF THE 
                    UNITED STATES.

  Section 3025 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 
2014 (33 U.S.C. 2267b) is amended by adding at the end the following:
  ``(e) Assessments in the Territories of the United States.--
          ``(1) In general.--For any major disaster declared in the 
        territories of the United States before the date of enactment 
        of this subsection, all activities in the territory carried out 
        or undertaken pursuant to the authorities described under this 
        section shall be conducted at full Federal expense unless the 
        President determines that the territory has the ability to pay 
        the cost share for an assessment under this section without the 
        use of non-Federal funds or loans.
          ``(2) Territories defined.--In this subsection, the term 
        `territories of the United States' means those insular areas 
        specified in section 1156(a)(1) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2310(a)(1)).''.

                           TITLE II--STUDIES

SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPOSED FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

  The Secretary is authorized to conduct a feasibility study for the 
following projects for water resources development and conservation and 
other purposes, as identified in the reports titled ``Report to 
Congress on Future Water Resources Development'' submitted to Congress 
on March 17, 2017, and February 5, 2018, respectively, pursuant to 
section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 
(33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by Congress:
          (1) Cave buttes dam, arizona.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Phoenix, Arizona.
          (2) San diego river, california.--Project for flood risk 
        management, navigation, and ecosystem restoration, San Diego, 
        California.
          (3) J. bennett johnston waterway, louisiana.--Project for 
        navigation, J. Bennett Johnston Waterway, Louisiana.
          (4) Northshore, louisiana.--Project for flood risk 
        management, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana.
          (5) Ouachita-black rivers, louisiana.--Project for 
        navigation, Little River, Louisiana.
          (6) Chautauqua lake, new york.--Project for ecosystem 
        restoration and flood risk management, Chautauqua, New York.
          (7) Trinity river and tributaries, texas.--Project for 
        navigation, Liberty, Texas.
          (8) West cell levee, texas.--Project for flood risk 
        management, Irving, Texas.
          (9) Coastal virginia, virginia.--Project for flood risk 
        management, ecosystem restoration, and navigation, Coastal 
        Virginia.
          (10) Tangier island, virginia.--Project for flood risk 
        management and ecosystem restoration, Tangier Island, Virginia.

SEC. 202. ADDITIONAL STUDIES.

  (a) Lower Mississippi River; Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, 
Mississippi, and Louisiana.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
        studies to determine the feasibility of habitat restoration for 
        each of the eight reaches identified as priorities in the 
        report prepared by the Secretary pursuant to section 402 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2000, titled ``Lower 
        Mississippi River Resource Assessment; Final Assessment In 
        Response to Section 402 of WRDA 2000'' and dated July 2015.
          (2) Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult with the Lower 
        Mississippi River Conservation Committee during each 
        feasibility study carried out under paragraph (1).
  (b) St. Louis Riverfront, Meramec River Basin, Missouri and 
Illinois.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
        studies to determine the feasibility of a project for ecosystem 
        restoration and flood risk management in Madison, St. Clair, 
        and Monroe Counties, Illinois, St. Louis City, and St. Louis, 
        Jefferson, Franklin, Gasconade, Maries, Phelps, Crawford, Dent, 
        Washington, Iron, St. Francois, St. Genevieve, Osage, Reynolds, 
        and Texas Counties, Missouri.
          (2) Continuation of existing study.--Any study carried out 
        under paragraph (1) shall be considered a continuation of the 
        study being carried out under Committee Resolution 2642 of the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives, adopted June 21, 2000.

SEC. 203. EXPEDITED COMPLETION OF REPORTS FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS.

  (a) Feasibility Reports.--The Secretary shall expedite the completion 
of a feasibility study for each of the following projects, and if the 
Secretary determines that the project is justified in a completed 
report, may proceed directly to preconstruction planning, engineering, 
and design of the project:
          (1) Project for riverbank stabilization, Selma, Alabama.
          (2) Project for ecosystem restoration, Three Mile Creek, 
        Alabama.
          (3) Project for navigation, Nome, Alaska.
          (4) Project for flood diversion, Seward, Alaska.
          (5) Project for navigation, Three Rivers, Arkansas.
          (6) Project for flood control, water conservation, and 
        related purposes, Coyote Valley Dam, California.
          (7) Project for flood risk management, Lower Cache Creek, 
        California.
          (8) Project for flood risk management, Lower San Joaquin 
        River, California, as described in section 1322(b)(2)(F) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1707) 
        (second phase of feasibility study).
          (9) Project for flood risk management, South San Francisco, 
        California.
          (10) Project for flood risk management and ecosystem 
        restoration, Tijuana River, California.
          (11) Project for flood risk management in East Hartford, 
        Connecticut.
          (12) Project for flood risk management in Hartford, 
        Connecticut.
          (13) Projects under the Comprehensive Flood Mitigation Study 
        for the Delaware River Basin.
          (14) Project for ecosystem restoration, Lake Apopka, Florida.
          (15) Project for ecosystem restoration, Kansas River Weir, 
        Kansas.
          (16) Project for water resource improvements, Willamette 
        River Basin, Fern Ridge, Oregon.
          (17) Project for ecosystem restoration, Resacas at 
        Brownsville, Texas.
          (18) Project for navigation, Norfolk Harbor, Virginia.
          (19) Project for coastal storm risk management, Norfolk, 
        Virginia.
          (20) Project for navigation, Tacoma Harbor, Washington.
  (b) Lower San Joaquin River, California.--In expediting completion of 
the second phase of the Lower San Joaquin River feasibility study under 
subsection (a)(8), the Secretary shall review and give priority to any 
plans and designs requested by non-Federal interests and incorporate 
such plans and designs into the Federal study if the Secretary 
determines that such plans and designs are consistent with Federal 
standards.
  (c) Post-authorization Change Reports.--The Secretary shall expedite 
completion of a post-authorization change report for the following 
projects:
          (1) Project for flood risk management, San Luis Rey River 
        Flood Control Protection Project, California.
          (2) Project for flood risk management, Success Reservoir 
        Enlargement Project, California.
          (3) Everglades Agricultural Area Reservoir, Central 
        Everglades Planning Project, Florida.
          (4) Project for navigation, Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan.
  (d) Upper Mississippi River Protection.--Section 2010 of the Water 
Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1270) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
  ``(d) Considerations.--In carrying out a disposition study with 
respect to the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam, including a 
disposition study under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
(33 U.S.C. 549a), the Secretary may not complete such study until the 
Secretary considers, and issues a report to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate on--
          ``(1) the feasibility of carrying out modifications to the 
        Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam to--
                  ``(A) preserve and enhance recreational opportunities 
                and the health of the ecosystem; and
                  ``(B) maintain the benefits to the natural ecosystem 
                and human environment; and
          ``(2) the preservation of any portion of the Upper St. 
        Anthony Falls Lock and Dam necessary to maintain flood 
        control.''.

   TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS, MODIFICATIONS, AND RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. DEAUTHORIZATION OF INACTIVE PROJECTS.

  (a) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are--
          (1) to identify $3,000,000,000 in water resources development 
        projects authorized by Congress that are no longer viable for 
        construction due to--
                  (A) a lack of local support;
                  (B) a lack of available Federal or non-Federal 
                resources; or
                  (C) an authorizing purpose that is no longer relevant 
                or feasible;
          (2) to create an expedited and definitive process for 
        Congress to deauthorize water resources development projects 
        that are no longer viable for construction; and
          (3) to allow the continued authorization of water resources 
        development projects that are viable for construction.
  (b) Interim Deauthorization List.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop an interim 
        deauthorization list that identifies--
                  (A) each water resources development project, or 
                separable element of a project, authorized for 
                construction before November 8, 2007, for which--
                          (i) planning, design, or construction was not 
                        initiated before the date of enactment of this 
                        Act; or
                          (ii) planning, design, or construction was 
                        initiated before the date of enactment of this 
                        Act, but for which no funds, Federal or non-
                        Federal, were obligated for planning, design, 
                        or construction of the project or separable 
                        element of the project during the current 
                        fiscal year or any of the 6 preceding fiscal 
                        years;
                  (B) each project or separable element identified and 
                included on a list to Congress for deauthorization 
                pursuant to section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)); and
                  (C) any project or separable element for which the 
                non-Federal sponsor of such project or separable 
                element submits a request for inclusion on the list.
          (2) Public comment and consultation.--
                  (A) In general.--The Secretary shall solicit comments 
                from the public and the Governors of each applicable 
                State on the interim deauthorization list developed 
                under paragraph (1).
                  (B) Comment period.--The public comment period shall 
                be 90 days.
          (3) Submission to congress; publication.--Not later than 90 
        days after the date of the close of the comment period under 
        paragraph (2), the Secretary shall--
                  (A) submit a revised interim deauthorization list to 
                the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
                Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; and
                  (B) publish the revised interim deauthorization list 
                in the Federal Register.
  (c) Final Deauthorization List.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop a final 
        deauthorization list of water resources development projects, 
        or separable elements of projects, from the revised interim 
        deauthorization list described in subsection (b)(3).
          (2) Deauthorization amount.--
                  (A) Proposed final list.--The Secretary shall prepare 
                a proposed final deauthorization list of projects and 
                separable elements of projects that have, in the 
                aggregate, an estimated Federal cost to complete that 
                is at least $3,000,000,000.
                  (B) Determination of Federal cost to complete.--For 
                purposes of subparagraph (A), the Federal cost to 
                complete shall take into account any allowances 
                authorized by section 902 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280), as applied to 
                the most recent project schedule and cost estimate.
          (3) Identification of projects.--
                  (A) Sequencing of projects.--
                          (i) In general.--The Secretary shall identify 
                        projects and separable elements of projects for 
                        inclusion on the proposed final deauthorization 
                        list according to the order in which the 
                        projects and separable elements of the projects 
                        were authorized, beginning with the earliest 
                        authorized projects and separable elements of 
                        projects and ending with the latest project or 
                        separable element of a project necessary to 
                        meet the aggregate amount under paragraph 
                        (2)(A).
                          (ii) Factors to consider.--The Secretary may 
                        identify projects and separable elements of 
                        projects in an order other than that 
                        established by clause (i) if the Secretary 
                        determines, on a case-by-case basis, that a 
                        project or separable element of a project is 
                        critical for interests of the United States, 
                        based on the possible impact of the project or 
                        separable element of the project on public 
                        health and safety, the national economy, or the 
                        environment.
                          (iii) Consideration of public comments.--In 
                        making determinations under clause (ii), the 
                        Secretary shall consider any comments received 
                        under subsection (b)(2).
                  (B) Appendix.--The Secretary shall include as part of 
                the proposed final deauthorization list an appendix 
                that--
                          (i) identifies each project or separable 
                        element of a project on the interim 
                        deauthorization list developed under subsection 
                        (b) that is not included on the proposed final 
                        deauthorization list; and
                          (ii) describes the reasons why the project or 
                        separable element is not included on the 
                        proposed final list.
          (4) Public comment and consultation.--
                  (A) In general.--The Secretary shall solicit comments 
                from the public and the Governor of each applicable 
                State on the proposed final deauthorization list and 
                appendix developed under paragraphs (2) and (3).
                  (B) Comment period.--The public comment period shall 
                be 90 days.
          (5) Submission of final list to congress; publication.--Not 
        later than 120 days after the date of the close of the comment 
        period under paragraph (4), the Secretary shall--
                  (A) submit a final deauthorization list and an 
                appendix to the final deauthorization list in a report 
                to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
                Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; and
                  (B) publish the final deauthorization list and the 
                appendix to the final deauthorization list in the 
                Federal Register.
  (d) Deauthorization; Congressional Review.--
          (1) In general.--After the expiration of the 180-day period 
        beginning on the date of submission of the final 
        deauthorization list and appendix under subsection (c), a 
        project or separable element of a project identified in the 
        final deauthorization list is hereby deauthorized, unless 
        Congress passes a joint resolution disapproving the final 
        deauthorization list prior to the end of such period.
          (2) Non-federal contributions.--
                  (A) In general.--A project or separable element of a 
                project identified in the final deauthorization list 
                under subsection (c) shall not be deauthorized under 
                this subsection if, before the expiration of the 180-
                day period referred to in paragraph (1), the non-
                Federal interest for the project or separable element 
                of the project provides sufficient funds to complete 
                the project or separable element of the project.
                  (B) Treatment of projects.--Notwithstanding 
                subparagraph (A), each project and separable element of 
                a project identified in the final deauthorization list 
                shall be treated as deauthorized for purposes of the 
                aggregate deauthorization amount specified in 
                subsection (c)(2)(A).
          (3) Projects identified in appendix.--A project or separable 
        element of a project identified in the appendix to the final 
        deauthorization list shall remain subject to future 
        deauthorization by Congress.
  (e) Special Rule for Projects Receiving Funds for Post-authorization 
Study.--A project or separable element of a project may not be 
identified on the interim deauthorization list developed under 
subsection (b), or the final deauthorization list developed under 
subsection (c), if the project or separable element received funding 
for a post-authorization study during the current fiscal year or any of 
the 6 preceding fiscal years.
  (f) General Provisions.--
          (1) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
        apply:
                  (A) Post-authorization study.--The term ``post-
                authorization study'' means--
                          (i) a feasibility report developed under 
                        section 905 of the Water Resources Development 
                        Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282);
                          (ii) a feasibility study, as defined in 
                        section 105(d) of the Water Resources 
                        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(d)); or
                          (iii) a review conducted under section 216 of 
                        the Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a), 
                        including an initial appraisal that--
                                  (I) demonstrates a Federal interest; 
                                and
                                  (II) requires additional analysis for 
                                the project or separable element.
                  (B) Water resources development project.--The term 
                ``water resources development project'' includes an 
                environmental infrastructure assistance project or 
                program of the Corps of Engineers.
          (2) Treatment of project modifications.--For purposes of this 
        section, if an authorized water resources development project 
        or separable element of the project has been modified by an Act 
        of Congress, the date of the authorization of the project or 
        separable element shall be deemed to be the date of the most 
        recent modification.

SEC. 302. BACKLOG PREVENTION.

  (a) Project Deauthorization.--
          (1) In general.--A water resources development project, or 
        separable element of such a project, authorized for 
        construction by this Act shall not be authorized after the last 
        day of the 10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of 
        this Act unless--
                  (A) funds have been obligated for construction of, or 
                a post-authorization study for, such project or 
                separable element during that period; or
                  (B) the authorization contained in this Act has been 
                modified by a subsequent Act of Congress.
          (2) Identification of projects.--Not later than 60 days after 
        the expiration of the 10-year period referred to in paragraph 
        (1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a report that identifies the projects 
        deauthorized under paragraph (1).
  (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 60 days after the expiration 
of the 12-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and make available to 
the public, a report that contains--
          (1) a list of any water resources development projects 
        authorized by this Act for which construction has not been 
        completed during that period;
          (2) a description of the reasons the projects were not 
        completed;
          (3) a schedule for the completion of the projects based on 
        expected levels of appropriations; and
          (4) a 5-year and 10-year projection of construction backlog 
        and any recommendations to Congress regarding how to mitigate 
        current problems and the backlog.
  (c) Clarification.--Section 6003(a) of the Water Resources Reform and 
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 579c(a)) is amended by striking ``7-
year'' each place it appears and inserting ``10-year''.

SEC. 303. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.

  (a) Consistency With Reports.--Congress finds that the project 
modifications described in this section are in accordance with the 
reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 7001 of 
the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 
2282d), titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources 
Development'', or have otherwise been reviewed by Congress.
  (b) Modifications.--
          (1) Harbor/South bay, california.--Section 219(f)(43) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (113 Stat. 337; 114 
        Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by striking ``$35,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$70,000,000''.
          (2) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--Section 
        219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (113 
        Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838; 130 Stat. 1677) 
        is amended by striking ``$60,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$89,550,000''.

SEC. 304. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN.

  The portion of the project for navigation, Milwaukee Harbor, 
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, authorized by the first section of the Act of 
March 3, 1843 (5 Stat. 619; chapter 85), consisting of the navigation 
channel within the Menomonee River that extends from the 16th Street 
Bridge upstream to the upper limit of the authorized navigation channel 
and described as follows is no longer authorized beginning on the date 
of enactment of this Act:
          (1) Beginning at a point in the channel just downstream of 
        the 16th Street Bridge, N383219.703, E2521152.527.
          (2) Thence running westerly along the channel about 2,530.2 
        feet to a point, N383161.314, E2518620.712.
          (3) Thence running westerly by southwesterly along the 
        channel about 591.7 feet to a point at the upstream limit of 
        the existing project, N383080.126, E2518036.371.
          (4) Thence running northerly along the upstream limit of the 
        existing project about 80.5 feet to a point, N383159.359, 
        E2518025.363.
          (5) Thence running easterly by northeasterly along the 
        channel about 551.2 feet to a point, N383235.185, E2518571.108.
          (6) Thence running easterly along the channel about 2,578.9 
        feet to a point, N383294.677, E2521150.798.
          (7) Thence running southerly across the channel about 74.3 
        feet to the point of origin.

SEC. 305. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CONNECTICUT.

  That portion of the project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, 
Connecticut, authorized by the Act of June 18, 1878 (20 Stat. 158), and 
modified by the Act of August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 401), the Act of March 
3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1122), the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 633), and 
the Act of July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 919), and lying upstream of a line 
commencing at point N627942.09, E879709.18 thence running southwesterly 
about 125 feet to a point N627832.03, E879649.91 is no longer 
authorized beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 306. CONVEYANCES.

  (a) Cheatham County, Tennessee.--
          (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary may convey to 
        Cheatham County, Tennessee (in this subsection referred to as 
        the ``Grantee''), all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to the real property in Cheatham County, 
        Tennessee, consisting of approximately 9.19 acres, identified 
        as portions of tracts E-514-1, E-514-2, E-518-1, E-518-2, E-
        519-1, E-537-1, and E-538, all being part of the Cheatham Lock 
        and Dam project at CRM 158.5, including any improvements 
        thereon.
          (2) Deed.--The conveyance of property under this subsection 
        shall be accomplished using a quitclaim deed and upon such 
        terms and conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to 
        protect the interests of the United States, to include 
        retaining the right to inundate with water any land transferred 
        under this subsection.
          (3) Consideration.--The Grantee shall pay to the Secretary an 
        amount that is not less than the fair market value of the land 
        conveyed under this subsection, as determined by the Secretary.
          (4) Subject to existing easements and other interests.--The 
        conveyance of property under this section shall be subject to 
        all existing easements, rights-of-way, and leases that are in 
        effect as of the date of the conveyance.
  (b) Nashville, Tennessee.--
          (1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary may convey, without 
        consideration, to the City of Nashville, Tennessee (in this 
        subsection referred to as the ``City''), all right, title, and 
        interest of the United States in and to the real property 
        covered by Lease No. DACW62-1-84-149, including any 
        improvements thereon, at the Riverfront Park Recreational 
        Development, consisting of approximately 5 acres, subject to 
        the right of the Secretary to retain any required easements in 
        the property.
          (2) Conveyance agreement.--A quit claim deed shall be used to 
        convey real property under this subsection upon the terms and 
        conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary and the City. 
        The deed shall provide that in the event the City, its 
        successors, or assigns cease to maintain improvements for 
        recreation included in the conveyance or otherwise utilize the 
        real property conveyed for purposes other than recreation and 
        compatible flood risk management, the City, its successor, or 
        assign shall repay to the United States the Federal share of 
        the cost of constructing the improvements for recreation under 
        the agreement between the United States and the City dated 
        December 8, 1981, increased as necessary to account for 
        inflation.
  (c) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
          (1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the legal description of any real property to be conveyed 
        under this section shall be determined by a survey that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
          (2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--Section 
        2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to any 
        conveyance under this section.
          (3) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
        such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
          (4) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance is 
        made under this section shall be responsible for all reasonable 
        and necessary costs, including real estate transaction and 
        environmental documentation costs, associated with the 
        conveyance.
          (5) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made under 
        this section shall hold the United States harmless from any 
        liability with respect to activities carried out, on or after 
        the date of the conveyance, on real property conveyed. The 
        United States shall remain responsible for any liability with 
        respect to activities carried out, before such date, on the 
        real property conveyed.

SEC. 307. CLATSOP COUNTY, OREGON.

  The portions of the project for raising and improving existing levees 
of Clatsop County Diking District No. 13, in Clatsop County, Oregon, 
authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1590), 
that are referred to as Christensen No. 1 Dike No. 42 and Christensen 
No. 2 Levee No. 43 are no longer authorized beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 308. KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA.

  Subject to a determination by the Secretary that the costs are 
reasonable and allowable and that the work for which credit is 
requested was carried out in accordance with the laws specified in 
section 5014(i)(2)(A) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
of 2014 (128 Stat. 1331) and all other applicable Federal laws, the 
Secretary may credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
Kissimmee River project, authorized in section 101(8) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802), the value of in-
kind contributions made by the non-Federal interest with respect to the 
six following actions, as described in the final report of the Director 
of Civil Works on the Central and Southern Florida Project, Kissimmee 
River Restoration Project, dated April 27, 2018:
          (1) Shady Oaks Fish Camp land preparation.
          (2) Rocks Fish Camp land preparation.
          (3) Levee breaching of Sparks Candler and Bronson Levees.
          (4) Packingham Slough construction related to land 
        acquisition.
          (5) Engineering analysis of River Acres engineering solution.
          (6) Small local levee modifications.

SEC. 309. LYTLE AND CAJON CREEKS, CALIFORNIA.

  That portion of the channel improvement project, Lytle and Cajon 
Creeks, California, authorized to be carried out as a part of the 
project for the Santa Ana River Basin, California, by the Act of 
December 22, 1944 (Chapter 665; 58 Stat. 900) that consists of five 
earth-filled groins commonly referred to as ``the Riverside Avenue 
groins'' is no longer authorized as a Federal project beginning on the 
date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 310. YUBA RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

  (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, Yuba River 
Basin, California, authorized by section 101(a)(10) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275) is modified to allow 
a non-Federal interest to construct a new levee to connect the existing 
levee with high ground.
  (b) Project Description.--The levee to be constructed shall tie into 
the existing levee at a point Northing 2186189.2438, Easting 
6703908.8657, thence running east and south along a path to be 
determined to a point Northing 2187849.4328, Easting 6719262.0164.
  (c) Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall execute a conforming 
amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding Respecting the Sacramento 
River Flood Control Project with the State of California dated November 
30, 1953, that is limited to changing the description of the project to 
reflect the modification.
  (d) No Federal Cost.--
          (1) Review costs.--Before construction of the levee described 
        in subsection (b), the Secretary may accept and expend funds 
        received from a non-Federal interest to review the planning, 
        engineering, and design of the levee described in subsection 
        (b) to ensure that such planning, engineering, and design 
        complies with Federal standards.
          (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        constructing the levee shall be 100 percent.

                TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE

SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

  The following projects for water resources development and 
conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled 
``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'' submitted 
to Congress on March 17, 2017, and February 5, 2018, respectively, 
pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development 
Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by Congress are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in 
the respective reports or decision documents designated in this 
section:
          (1) Navigation.--

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. TX     Galveston Harbor     Aug. 8, 2017  Federal: $10,046,000
           Channel Extension                 Non-Federal: $3,349,000
           Project, Houston-                 Total: $13,395,000
           Galveston
           Navigation
           Channels
------------------------------------------------------------------------

          (2) Flood risk management.--

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. NY      Mamaroneck-        Dec. 14, 2017  Federal: $53,500,000
           Sheldrake Rivers                  Non-Federal: $28,750,000
                                             Total: $82,250,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. HI     Ala Wai Canal       Dec. 21, 2017  Federal: $198,962,000;
                                             Non-Federal: $107,133,000
                                             Total: $306,095,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

          (3) Hurricane and storm damage risk reduction.--

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of       D.  Estimated Initial
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        Costs and  Estimated
                                Engineers        Renourishment  Costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. FL      St. Johns County   Aug. 8, 2017   Initial Federal: $5,712,000
                                              Initial Non-Federal:
                                              $19,122,000
                                             Initial Total: $24,834,000
                                              Renourishment Federal:
                                              $9,484,000
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $44,099,000
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $53,583,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. TX     Sabine Pass to      Dec. 7, 2017   Initial Federal:
           Galveston Bay                      $2,157,202,000
                                              Initial Non-Federal:
                                              $1,161,570,000
                                              Initial Total:
                                              $3,318,772,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. FL     St. Lucie County    Dec. 15, 2017  Initial Federal: $7,097,000
                                             Initial Non-Federal:
                                              $13,179,000
                                              Initial Total: $20,276,000
                                              Renourishment Federal:
                                              $8,915,000
                                             Renourishment Non-Federal:
                                              $24,105,000
                                             Renourishment Total:
                                              $33,020,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

          (4) Flood risk management and ecosystem restoration.--

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
                                Report of
A. State       B.  Name          Chief of        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. NM     Espanola Valley,     May 11, 2018  Federal: $40,117,000
           Rio Grande                        Non-Federal: $21,601,000
                                             Total: $61,718,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

          (5) Modifications and other projects.--

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               C.  Date of
A. State       B.  Name          Decision        D.  Estimated  Costs
                                 Document
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. GA     Savannah Harbor      Dec. 5, 2016  Federal: $677,613,600
           Expansion Project                 Non-Federal: $295,829,400
                                             Total: $973,443,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. KY     Kentucky River      April 20,      Federal: $0
           Locks and Dams -    2018          Non-Federal: $0
           1, 2, 3, and 4                    Total: $0
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                         Purpose of Legislation

    H.R. 8 authorizes the United States Army Corps of Engineers 
(Corps) to carry out water resources development activities for 
the Nation, usually through cost-sharing partnerships with non-
federal sponsors. Activities include navigation, flood damage 
reduction, shoreline protection, hydropower, dam safety, water 
supply, recreation, environmental restoration and protection, 
and disaster response and recovery. H.R. 8 also reforms the 
Corps planning process, promotes timely project delivery, 
empowers non-Federal project sponsors, and strengthens 
congressional oversight.

                  Background and Need for Legislation

    America enjoys an unparalleled network of natural harbors 
and rivers. The ports, channels, locks, dams, and other 
infrastructure that support our maritime and waterways 
transportation system and provide flood protection for our 
homes and businesses are vitally important to a healthy 
national economy and job growth. Ensuring a sound 
infrastructure network is a shared responsibility, with Federal 
and state roles recognized by our Founding Fathers. The Water 
Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2018 promotes the Federal 
commitment to our Nation's competitiveness, prosperity, and 
economic growth by maintaining a strong transportation 
infrastructure, ensuring the efficient flow of domestic and 
international commerce, and protecting the lives and 
livelihoods of the American people in a sustainable manner. 
Through WRDA, Congress authorizes the key missions of the 
Corps, including developing, maintaining, and supporting the 
Nation's economically vital waterway infrastructure and 
supporting effective and targeted flood protection and 
environmental restoration needs. WRDA also provides Congress 
the opportunity to make much needed policy reforms, strengthen 
oversight, promote efficient, effective, and transparent 
project development and implementation, and open the door to 
innovation and stronger partnerships that will improve 
infrastructure development. Water resources legislation should 
be enacted every two years to provide oversight of and policy 
direction to the Administration and the Corps.
    Since 2014, the Committee has resumed the regular 
consideration of Water Resources Development Acts no less than 
once a Congress. The Water Resources Development Act of 2018 
continues the WRDA 2-year cycle that provides appropriate 
oversight of and policy direction to the Administration and the 
Corps.
    The transformative nature of the last two WRDA bills has 
provided the Corps and the non-Federal sponsors with a 
tremendous number of new opportunities for advancing projects 
more quickly. The Committee has been concerned with the pace 
that the Corps has issued implementation guidance, and expects 
that now that the Corps has had time to work through the new 
authorities and processes set up in WRRDA 2014 and WRDA 2016, 
project delivery can begin to speed up. The Corps estimates 
that the current backlog of authorized projects studies is over 
$96 billion. The Committee expects that the provisions put 
forward in this bill, as well as the last two WRDA bills, will 
help reverse the trend seen over the years of the Corps and OMB 
finding new and creative ways to reject, disqualify, or 
otherwise stifle investment in worthwhile and beneficial water 
resources development projects, and instead, permit, encourage, 
and enable these projects to move forward.
    One of the creative ways to reject investment in beneficial 
water resources projects is the use of unrealistic benefit-cost 
analyses (BCAs) in the formulation, evaluation, and budgeting 
of water resources development projects. The Committee 
continues to be approached by members and non-Federal projects 
sponsors who have projects that are authorized but are being 
told no because the way the Administration has decided to 
calculate the BCA leaves them in the dark. Congress is clear, 
if a project is authorized, Congress believes it is worthy of 
funding.
    Because of the increasing frustration with BCAs across all 
Corps project areas, this bill contains a provision that 
requires the Corps to contract with the National Academy of 
Sciences to carry out a study on the Corps' use and application 
of their current BCAs and to recommend changes to improve 
transparency, cost savings, and the return on Federal 
investment. Corps water resources development projects have 
long time horizons reflective of their critical importance to 
maintaining the Nation's economic prosperity, national 
security, and environmental protection. This report should 
provide a more realistic look at what benefits should be 
included in BCA calculations to help inform a more reality-
based process. The Committee encourages the Corps to 
proactively work with non-Federal sponsors to transparently 
discuss the principles and analytical methodologies used in 
developing BCAs on these projects.
    In 1986, Congress enacted the Harbor Maintenance Tax to 
recover the operation and maintenance dredging costs for 
commercial ports from maritime shippers. The Harbor Maintenance 
Tax is directly levied on importers and domestic shippers using 
coastal or inland ports as a 0.125 percent ad valorem tax on 
the value of imported cargo (e.g., $1.25 per $1,000 value) and 
is typically passed along in the purchase of imported goods or 
services. These revenues are deposited into a HMTF within the 
U.S. Treasury from which Congress currently appropriates funds 
to the Corps for harbor maintenance dredging.
    The HMTF has historically collected far more revenues from 
shippers than Congress has appropriated to the Corps to 
maintain our harbors, with approximately $9 billion in already-
collected revenues sitting idle in the U.S. Treasury. As a 
result, shippers continue to honor their commitment to pay for 
promised maintenance activities, but the dredging needs of our 
Nation's ports go unmet. According to the Corps, full 
navigation channels at our Nation's busiest 59 ports are 
available less than 35 percent of the time--and the conditions 
of our midsize and emerging harbors are far worse. To be clear, 
there are sufficient funds in the Trust Fund to meet the 
maintenance dredging needs of all Federally authorized ports.
    This Committee took the initial steps to ensure that Harbor 
Maintenance taxes are fully utilized through enactment of 
discretionary appropriations targets from the Trust Fund in the 
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (WRRDA). 
This provision established annually increasing targets for 
appropriations from the Trust Fund to be used for the 
operations and maintenance of our authorized commercial 
harbors. This provision also established the first mandatory 
set-aside for the nation's small (emerging) commercial harbors. 
The Committee is pleased these discretionary targets have been 
successfully reached in the initial years after enactment of 
WRRDA 2014, including 95% of HMTF revenues being spent in 
fiscal year 2018, but recognizes the challenge of reaching full 
allocation of annual HMTF collections while not also negatively 
affecting the other missions and responsibilities of the Corps.
    At the same time, even under the status quo of WRRDA 2014, 
there is an ever-growing balance in the Trust Fund that is not 
being used for its intended purpose. According to the 
Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the HMTF will collect $18.5 
billion in new revenues over the next decade--in addition to 
the approximately $9 billion in previously collected but 
unspent revenues in the HMTF. Yet, according to CBO, Federal 
appropriations from the HMTF over the next decade are only 
expected to total $14.3 billion, and would result in the 
balance of the HMTF doubling--reaching $17.2 billion in fiscal 
year 2026. Under this scenario, the maintenance needs of 
commercial ports will continue to go unmet, while the funding 
to fix them remains idle.
    Section 102 is intended to work in tandem with the existing 
discretionary appropriations targets of WRRDA 2014 by allowing, 
in fiscal year 2029, the Secretary to utilize the existing 
balances in the Trust Fund to meet the operation and 
maintenance needs of authorized commercial harbors. By 
specifically authorizing the commercial harbors where these 
funds could be used, as well as the authorized purposes of 
these funds, Congress has already established clear, statutory 
limits on expenditures from the Trust Fund. This authority 
simply provides a separate avenue for allowing the expenditure 
of these funds for their intended purposes, rather than the 
status quo, which allows these funds to be used to mask other 
expenditures of the Federal government and the true size of the 
Federal deficit.
    The Committee is cautiously positive about the new 
implementation of Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 
1899 (commonly called a `408 permission', since this law is 
codified in 33 U.S.C. Sec. 408). Non-Federal entities seeking 
to modify Federal water resources projects are often required 
to obtain a 408 permission from the Corps prior to initiating 
the modification; however, the Committee has previously 
addressed the issues with the way the Corps is implementing 
this provision. The changes the Corps has finally implemented 
in WRRDA 2014, and WRDA 2016, along with issuing a new 
engineering circular, should make the process of obtaining 408 
permissions faster. The Corps should ensure that necessary 
permissions under this authority are carried out in an 
expeditious and transparent manner, consistent with Federal 
law, and that Corps regulatory personnel are provided with 
sufficient Federal resources to carry out this authority.
    This bill contains several provisions related to crediting 
of work done by non-Federal sponsors. The Committee encourages 
the Corps to work proactively with non-Federal sponsors to 
educate them about the different crediting and reimbursement 
options available. Additionally, non-Federal sponsors are 
encouraged to fully understand what crediting options are 
available and to ensure they are complying with all 
requirements necessary to receive credit for work done. The 
Committee is concerned with the number of requests for credit 
from non-Federal sponsors for work performed that has not been 
performed in the same way the Corps would have executed the 
project.
    The Committee reemphasizes the need to engage with non-
Federal project sponsors and their associated representatives 
to coordinate and consult on implementation guidance. This bill 
directs the Corps to adopt an open process to gather input and 
initiate a dialogue with those non-Federal sponsors who have a 
stake in how programs and activities are carried out. Hosting 
one-way communications through Webinars and other non-
participatory forums jeopardizes the necessary modifications 
and adjustments to the Corps programs and activities that are 
authorized in WRDAs. The Corps should work to ensure all non-
Federal project sponsor and relevant stakeholders voices are 
heard and incorporate those considerations and Congressional 
intent into final implementation guidance.
    The Committee would encourage the Corps and the non-Federal 
sponsors to work together to utilize best and latest practices 
in the area of digital monitoring technology, when designing 
and building environmental infrastructure projects. Utilization 
of such technology for analysis, management and implementation 
of projects can result in the greatest cost effectiveness and 
savings of Federal dollars in the short run and cost savings 
over the long run for the grantee.
    The Committee has authorized a harmful algal bloom 
technology development demonstration at the Engineer Research 
and Development Center. The Committee expects that the 
Secretary will work with other Federal agencies who are 
conducting HABs research and ensure that they are not 
duplicating work being done by others. Additionally, the 
Committee hopes that the research for technology can look at 
technology that can be scaled to have the capability to remove 
harmful algal blooms on a large scale basis.
    The Committee encourages the Corps to expedite completion 
of a post-authorization change report for the Everglades 
Agricultural Area Reservoir component of the Central Everglades 
Planning Project, Florida. The Committee recognizes the 
importance of the Central Everglades Planning Project report 
for environmental restoration and flood control to the 
restoration of the Florida Everglades, and hopes to complete 
its final review of this project for Congressional 
authorization, at dollar amounts directed by the Secretary, 
once a favorable report of the Chief is completed.
    The Committee understands that WRDA 2000 established a 
review process for the programmatic regulations initially 
promulgated to guide the implementation of the Comprehensive 
Everglades Restoration Plan. The Committee is concerned that a 
review of these regulations has not been conducted since 2009, 
and directs the Secretary to undertake such a review.
    In WRDA 2016, the Committee instructed the Secretary to 
provide assistance to displaced tribes along the Columbia River 
as a result of the construction of the lower Columbia River 
Dams. The Committee is concerned that OMB is not taking 
seriously the treaty obligations to provide assistance and 
would encourage the government to work towards a solution for 
these tribes in an expeditious manner. As much as is possible, 
if the determination is made that additional housing is 
warranted, the purchase of private land shall be avoided, and 
housing shall be provided using current Federal or tribal 
reservation land.
    Included in this legislation is authorization of the Lower 
San Joaquin River flood damage reduction project and expediting 
the second phase of the study to determine the feasibility of 
constructing a project to protect the Cities of Lathrop, 
Manteca and Stockton, and unincorporated San Joaquin County, 
also known as ``Reclamation District 17'' (RD17). The Committee 
is aware of discussions between the non-Federal project 
sponsors and the Corps regarding the application of Executive 
Order 11988 for this second phase study. As RD17 is not in the 
100-year floodplain, EO 11988 should not apply, and should not 
be a barrier to evaluating Federal interest in the basin. The 
Committee has the expectation that priority will be provided to 
analyze alternatives proposed by the non-Federal project 
sponsor.

                        Hearings and Roundtables

    On October 27, 2017, the Subcommittee on Water Resources 
and Environment held a roundtable on ``America's Water 
Resources Infrastructure: Concepts for the Next Water Resources 
Development Act'', in Miami, Florida.
    On January 18, 2018, the Subcommittee on Water Resources 
and Environment held a hearing on ``America's Water Resources 
Infrastructure: Approaches to Enhanced Project Delivery.''
    On March 15, 2018, the Subcommittee on Water Resources and 
Environment held a hearing on ``Building a 21st Century 
Infrastructure for America: Water Resources Projects and 
Policy.''
    On April 20, 2018, the Subcommittee on Water Resources and 
Environment held a roundtable on ``America's Water Resources 
Infrastructure: Concepts for the Next Water Resources 
Development Act, Part II'', in Coos Bay, Oregon.

                 Legislative History and Consideration

    On May 18, 2018, House Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Ranking Member 
Peter DeFazio (D-OR) with Subcommittee on Water Resources and 
Environment Chairman Garret Graves (R-LA) and Ranking Member 
Grace F. Napolitano (D-CA) introduced H.R. 8, the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2018. The bill was referred solely 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
    On May 23, 2018, the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure met in open session and ordered the bill, as 
amended, reported favorably to the House by voice vote with a 
quorum present.
    A Manager's Amendment was offered in Committee by Chairman 
Shuster, which was adopted by voice vote, making several 
technical and conforming changes to the bill.
    An amendment (Young 138) was offered in Committee by 
Congressman Don Young (R-AK) and withdrawn. The amendment would 
have amended a cost share change that applied retroactively.
    An amendment (Nolan 97) was offered in Committee by 
Congressman Richard M. Nolan (D-MN) and defeated by a record 
vote. The amendment would have created a grant program for 
wastewater treatment.
    An amendment (Bost 42) was offered in Committee by 
Congressman Mike Bost (R-IL) and withdrawn. This amendment 
would have permitted a non-Federal sponsor to pay an amount 
sufficient to achieve a positive benefit cost ratio on a 
rehabilitation project.
    An amendment (Titus 46) was offered in Committee by 
Congresswoman Dina Titus (D-NV) and defeated by voice vote. The 
amendment would have amended the authorization of the Lake 
Tahoe program.
    An amendment (Mitchell 43) was offered in Committee by 
Congressman Paul Mitchell (R-MI) and withdrawn. The amendment 
would have added to the list of feasibility studies for the 
Secretary to expedite.
    A revised amendment (Mast 67) was offered in Committee by 
Congressman Brian J. Mast (R-FL) and approved by voice vote. 
The amendment authorized a harmful algal bloom technology 
development demonstration at the Engineer Research and 
Development Center.
    An amendment (Frankel 42) was offered in Committee by 
Congresswoman Lois Frankel (D-FL) and withdrawn. The amendment 
would have removed a legal prohibition against use of foreign 
sand.
    An amendment (Bustos 45) was offered in Committee by 
Congresswoman Cheri Bustos (D-IL) and approved by voice vote. 
The amendment clarified that operations and maintenance 
activities at Corps owned locks and dams are inherently 
governmental functions.
    An en bloc amendment was offered in Committee by Chairman 
Shuster, and was approved by voice vote. The en bloc amendment 
consisted of the following amendments:
          a revised amendment (Esty 65) offered by 
        Congresswoman Elizabeth Esty (D-CT) to require the 
        Secretary to report on the use of innovative materials;
          a revised amendment (Esty 68) offered by 
        Congresswoman Elizabeth Esty (D-CT) to require the 
        National Academy of Sciences to review the effects of 
        Corps leadership rotations;
          a revised amendment (Graves 37) offered by 
        Congressman Sam Graves (R-MO) prevents the construction 
        of interception rearing complexes until the Corps 
        reports to Congress;
          a revised amendment (Lawrence 77) offered by 
        Congresswoman Brenda L. Lawrence (D-MI) to require the 
        study of workforce capacity and technology use at the 
        Corps;
          an amendment (Lipinski 100) offered by Congressman 
        Daniel Lipinski (D-IL) to require the Corps to furnish 
        publically available list of real-estate assets;
          an amendment (Lipinski 102) offered by Congressman 
        Daniel Lipinski (D-IL), to direct the Corps to enter a 
        memorandum of understanding with the Environmental 
        Protection Agency for the remediation of the Bubbly 
        Creek ecosystem restoration project, Illinois;
          a revised amendment (Mast 63) offered by Congressman 
        Brian J. Mast (R-FL) to allow non-Federal sponsors to 
        recommend their own projects to the Corps for inclusion 
        on a potential project deauthorization list submitted 
        to Congress;
          a revised amendment (Mast 64) offered by Congressman 
        Brian J. Mast (R-FL) to direct the corps to provide 
        technical assistance to feasibility studies paid for by 
        non-Federal sponsors;
          a revised amendment (Mast 66) offered by Congressman 
        Brian J. Mast (R-FL) to expedite the review of the Lake 
        Okeechobee Regulation Schedule;
          a revised amendment (Nolan 99) offered by Congressman 
        Richard M. Nolan (D-MN) to direct the Engineer Research 
        and Development Center to research aquatic invasive 
        species and report back to Congress;
          a revised amendment (Plaskett 70) offered by 
        Congresswoman Stacey E. Plaskett (D-VI) to allow for 
        the discretionary waiver of the cost share for post 
        disaster watershed assessments in the U.S. Territories;
          an amendment (Rouzer 17) offered by Congressman David 
        Rouzer (R-NC) to clarify the effect of hurricane and 
        storm damage reduction extensions granted by the Corps;
          a revised amendment (Sanford 84) offered by 
        Congressman Mark Sanford (R-SC) to direct a study of 
        the use of nature based infrastructure;
          an amendment (Wilson 50) offered by Congresswoman 
        Frederica S. Wilson (D-FL) to clarify the issuance of 
        credit to non-Federal sponsors upon request;
          an amendment (Young 140) offered by Congressman Don 
        Young (R-AK) to amend the small river and harbor 
        projects program;
          an amendment (Young 141) offered by Congressman Don 
        Young (R-AK) to direct a study on the efforts to 
        relocate Alaska Native Villages due to flooding and 
        erosion threats;
          and a revised amendment (Young 142) offered by 
        Congressman Don Young (R-AK) to direct a study on 
        improving the Corps waiver processes.
    An amendment (Frankel 43) was offered in Committee by 
Congressman Lois Frankel (D-FL) and withdrawn. The amendment 
would have allowed the Corps to carry out discrete segments of 
authorized projects using advanced funds.
    A revised amendment (Faso 55) was offered in Committee by 
Congressman John J. Faso (R-NY) and withdrawn. The amendment 
would have allowed the Secretary to consider natural 
infrastructure alternatives in flood risk management and storm 
damage reduction studies.
    A revised amendment (Plaskett 69) was offered in Committee 
by Congresswoman Stacey E. Plaskett (D-VI) and withdrawn. The 
amendment would have made Territories of the United States 
eligible for inclusion in the tribal partnership program.
    A revised amendment (Davis 73) was offered in Committee by 
Congressman Rodney Davis (R-IL) and withdrawn. The amendment 
would have set a cost share for the operations and maintenance 
of a project authorized under the Great Lakes and Mississippi 
River Interbasin Study, and required consultation with the 
Governor of the State where the project is located.

                            Committee Votes

    Clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives requires each committee report to include the 
total number of votes cast for and against on each record vote 
on a motion to report and on any amendment offered to the 
measure or matter, and the names of those members voting for 
and against. One recorded vote was taken during consideration 
of H.R. 8, on the amendment offered by Congressman Richard M. 
Nolan (D-MN), designated 97. The amendment was not agreed to by 
a vote of 22-34. A motion to order H.R. 8, as amended, reported 
favorably to the House was agreed to by voice vote with a 
quorum present.

                      Committee Oversight Findings

    With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(1) of rule 
XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the 
Committee's oversight findings and recommendations are 
reflected in this report.

  New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures and Congressional Budget 
                          Office Cost Estimate

    With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(2) of rule 
XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 
308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and with respect 
to requirements of clause (3)(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules 
of the House of Representatives and section 402 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has requested 
but not received a cost estimate for this bill from the 
Director of Congressional Budget Office. The Committee has 
requested but not received from the Director of the 
Congressional Budget Office a statement as to whether this bill 
contains any new budget authority, spending authority, credit 
authority, or an increase or decrease in revenues or tax 
expenditures. The Chairman of the Committee shall cause such 
estimate and statement to be printed in the Congressional 
Record upon its receipt by the Committee.

                    Performance Goals and Objectives

    With respect to the requirement of clause 3(c)(4) of rule 
XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the 
performance goal and objective of this legislation is to 
authorize the key missions of the Corps, including developing, 
maintaining, and supporting the Nation's economically vital 
waterway infrastructure and supporting effective and targeted 
flood protection and environmental restoration needs. 
Additionally, H.R. 8 is intended to accelerate the project 
delivery process, promote fiscal responsibility, and strengthen 
our water transportation networks to promote competiveness, 
prosperity, and economic growth. Finally, WRDA will increase 
transparency, accountability, and Congressional oversight in 
reviewing and prioritizing future water resources development 
activities.

                          Advisory of Earmarks

    Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House 
of Representatives, the Committee is required to include a list 
of congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited 
tariff benefits as defined in clause 9(e), 9(f), and 9(g) of 
rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives. No 
provision in the bill includes an earmark, limited tax benefit, 
or limited tariff benefit under clause 9(e), 9(f), or 9(g) of 
rule XXI.

                    Duplication of Federal Programs

    Pursuant to section 3(g) of H. Res. 5, 114th Cong. (2015), 
the Committee finds that no provision of H.R. 8, as amended, 
establishes or reauthorizes a program of the Federal government 
known to be duplicative of another Federal program, a program 
that was included in any report from the Government 
Accountability Office to Congress pursuant to section 21 of 
Public Law 111-139, or a program related to a program 
identified in the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance.

                   Disclosure of Directed Rulemakings

    Pursuant to section 3(i) of H. Res. 5, 114th Cong. (2015), 
the Committee estimates that enacting H.R. 8, as amended, does 
not specifically direct the completion of any specific rule 
makings within the meaning of section 551 of title 5, United 
States Code.

                       Federal Mandates Statement

    An estimate of Federal mandates prepared by the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 423 of the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Public Law 104-4) was not made 
available to the Committee in time for the filing of this 
report. The Chairman of the Committee shall cause such estimate 
to be printed in the Congressional Record upon its receipt by 
the Committee.

                        Preemption Clarification

    Section 423 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 
requires the report of any Committee on a bill or joint 
resolution to include a statement on the extent to which the 
bill or joint resolution is intended to preempt state, local, 
or tribal law. The Committee states that H.R. 8, as reported, 
does not preempt any state, local, or tribal law.

                      Advisory Committee Statement

    No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act are created by this 
legislation.

                Applicability to the Legislative Branch

    The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to 
the terms and conditions of employment or access to public 
services or accommodations within the meaning of section 
102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act (Public Law 
104-1).

               Section-by-Section Analysis of Legislation

Sec. 1. Short title
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary

                      TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Section 101. Sense of Congress regarding Water Resources Development 
        Bills

    This Sense of Congress emphasizes the unique missions of 
the Corps and re-affirms that Water Resources Development Acts 
should be considered by Congress every two years.

Section 102. Use of Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund to support navigation

    This section allows the Corps to use the funds available in 
the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund (HMTF) to carry out eligible 
operations and maintenance costs assigned to commercial 
navigation of harbors and inland harbors within the United 
States, beginning in fiscal year 2029.

Section 103. Assessment of harbors and inland harbors

    This section directs the Corps to include opportunities for 
the potential beneficial use of dredged materials in its 
assessment of the operation and maintenance needs at the 
Nation's harbors and inland harbors.

Section 104. Levee Safety Initiative reauthorization

    This section reauthorizes programs within National Levee 
Safety Initiative through fiscal year 2023 to continue 
promoting improved levee safety practices at the local, state, 
and Federal levels.

Section 105. Dam safety

    This section reauthorizes programs within the National Dam 
Safety Program Act through fiscal year 2023 to continue the 
Corps' role in reducing the risks to life and property from dam 
failure in the United States.

Section 106. Rehabilitation of Corps of Engineers constructed dams

    This section amends a program for the Corps to carry out 
projects for the rehabilitation of high hazard potential dams 
constructed before 1940.

Section 107. Forecast-informed reservoir operations

    This section directs the Corps to report to Congress on the 
use of forecast-informed reservoir operations at the Lake 
Mendocino project in California and the viability of using 
forecast-informed reservoir operations at other dams owned and 
operated by the Corps.

Section 108. Identification of nonpowered dams for hydropower 
        development

    This section directs the Corps to create a list of existing 
nonpowered dams, which are owned and operated by the Corps, 
that have the greatest potential for non-Federal hydropower 
development.

Section 109. Emergency response to natural disasters

    This section clarifies that hurricane and storm damage risk 
reduction projects damaged or destroyed by natural disasters, 
shall be rebuilt to either pre-storm levels or its design level 
of protection, whichever is greater.

Section 110. Integrated water resources planning

    This section directs the Corps to work with communities 
covered by a proposed water resources development project to 
coordinate the feasibility study with any existing local or 
regional water management plan.

Section 111. Mitigation banks

    This section directs the Corps to develop guidance on 
mitigation bank credit releases to maximize opportunities for 
mitigation and increase transparency in the use of mitigation 
banks.

Section 112. Indian tribes

    This section provides a more comprehensive definition of 
federally recognized Indian tribes that may work in partnership 
with the Corps on water resources development projects.

Section 113. Columbia River

    This section clarifies the Corps' obligations to provide 
assistance to Indian tribes displaced as a result of the 
construction of the Bonneville, John Day, and Dalles dams, in 
Oregon and Washington.

Section 114. Dissemination of information

    This section directs the Corps to develop and support 
education and awareness efforts to ensure that potential non-
Federal interests and locally elected officials are informed of 
the annual Report to Congress on Future Water Resources 
Development process established under Section 7001 of the Water 
Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014.

Section 115. Non-Federal engagement and review

    This section directs the Corps to engage with non-Federal 
stakeholders when finalizing implementation guidance for water 
resources development laws.

Section 116. Comprehensive backlog report

    This section directs the Corps to furnish a report to 
Congress on a complete list of projects, and separable elements 
of projects, that are authorized for construction but not 
completed. Additionally, the Corps shall submit a report to 
Congress on all deferred operation and maintenance needs at 
projects and properties under their control.

Section 117. Structures and facilities constructed by Secretary

    This section clarifies that the scope of reviews for 
permissions under section 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 
(commonly referred to as section 408) shall not include 
unimproved real estate of the Corps, provided that a 
modification of the real estate does not affect the function or 
usefulness of the project.

Section 118. Transparency in administrative expenses

    This section directs the Corps to contract with the 
National Academy of Public Administration to study the 
efficiency of the Corps' current staff salaries and 
administrative expense procedures, within one year of 
enactment.

Section 119. Study of the future of the United States Army Corps of 
        Engineers

    This section directs the Corps to contract with the 
National Academy of Sciences to evaluate and provide 
recommendations to Congress on the efficacy of the current 
organizational structure of the civil works functions of the 
Corps and identify potential impediments to efficient project 
delivery.

Section 120. Acknowledgement of credit

    This section clarifies that certain projects carried out by 
non-Federal interests pursuant to section 7007 of WRDA 2007 are 
eligible for credit.

Section 121. Non-Federal implementation pilot program

    This section reauthorizes a pilot program that allows the 
Corps to provide a non-Federal interest full project management 
control over a water resources development project.

Section 122. Study of Water Resources Development Projects by non-
        Federal Interests

    This section expedites projects by directing the Corps to 
furnish section 203 reviews to Congress upon completion, 
instead of after Administration review. Additionally, this 
section allows the Secretary of the Army-Civil Works to accept 
and expend funds provided by a non-Federal interest to conduct 
activities that are inherently governmental functions. 
Currently, when carrying out a study under section 203 
authority, the Assistant Secretary of the Army may not have the 
opportunity to review or participate in a proposed study until 
late in the process.

Section 123. Construction of water resources development projects by 
        non-Federal interests

    This section accelerates project delivery by allowing 
credit or reimbursement for certain segments of water resources 
development projects. Additionally, this section amends section 
204 of WRDA 1986 to allow a non-Federal interest to advance 
projects more expeditiously through the use of a written 
agreement with the Corps. The Committee intends that any action 
taken by the non-Federal interest shall be carried out pursuant 
to all applicable requirements existing in law.

Section 124. Advanced funds for water resources development studies and 
        projects

    This section helps move projects into construction by 
expanding the Corps' authority to accept advanced funds from 
non-Federal interests for water resources development projects. 
Subsection (b) provides that the use of any statutory provision 
that allows a non-Federal interest to provide, advance, or 
contribute funds to the Secretary for the development or 
implementation of a water resources development project does 
not adversely affect the timeline or budgeting processes for 
other projects that do not use such authorities. Accordingly, 
the Corps should treat projects that proceed through regular 
appropriations and statutory cost-share the same as projects 
that may utilize advanced or contributed funds.

Section 125. Funding to process permits

    This section amends Section 214 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000 to extend through 2026 the authority 
for public-utility companies, natural gas companies, or 
railroad carriers to contribute funds to the Corps to expedite 
the evaluation of a permit, under the jurisdiction of the 
Department of the Army, related to a project or activity for 
public purpose.

Section 126. Study on economic and budgetary analyses

    This section directs the Corps to contract with the 
National Academy of Sciences to review and make recommendations 
on improving the Corps' economic principles and analytical 
methodologies when evaluating the budgeting for water resources 
development projects.

Section 127. Study of corrosion management at Corps of Engineers 
        projects

    This section directs the Comptroller General to study the 
corrosion management efforts at projects and properties under 
the control of the Corps.

Section 128. Costs in excess of Federal participation limit

    This section clarifies that a non-Federal interest shall be 
responsible for all costs above the Federal participation limit 
for projects relating to emergency streambank and shoreline 
protection.

Section 129. Report on innovative materials

    This section directs the Corps to report to Congress on 
activities relating to the use of innovative materials in water 
resources development projects.

Section 130. Study on Corps of engineers

    This section directs the Comptroller General to study the 
capacity and preparedness of the Corps workforce, and the 
technologies used by the Corps to accomplish its missions and 
responsibilities.

Section 131. GAO study

    This section directs the Comptroller General to study the 
Corps' use of natural features and nature-based features in the 
study of feasibility projects for flood risk management, 
hurricane and storm damage reduction, and ecosystem 
restoration.

Section 132. GAO reports on Alaska Native village relocation efforts 
        due to flooding and erosion threats.

    This section directs the Comptroller to study and update 
previous reports related to efforts to relocate Alaska Native 
villages due to flooding and erosion threats.

Section 133. Study and report on expediting certain waiver processes

    This section directs the Corps to furnish a report to 
Congress on how to improve and implement the waiver process for 
non-Federal cost shares for certain storm damage prevention and 
reduction projects.

Section 134. Corps of Engineers continuing authorities program

    This section increases the authorization for small 
continuing authority projects associated with navigation 
improvements.

Section 135. Credit in lieu of reimbursement

    This section clarifies that the Secretary may provide a 
non-Federal interest of an authorized coastal navigation 
project credit in lieu of reimbursement owed to the non-Federal 
interest for work carried out prior to the date of enactment.

Section 136. Lake Okeechobee regulation schedule

    This section directs the Corps to expedite the review of 
the Lake Okeechobee regulation schedule to coincide with the 
completion of the Herbert Hoover Dike project and to consider 
relevant aspects of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration 
Plan.

Section 137. Missouri river

    This section prevents the Secretary from constructing any 
additional interception-rearing complexes on the Missouri River 
until the Corps submits a report to Congress regarding its 
impacts on navigation, flood control, and other authorized 
purposes set forth in the Missouri River Master Manual.

Section 138. Access to real data

    This section directs the Corps to create a publically 
available centralized database of Corps real estate assets.

Section 139. Aquatic invasive species research

    This section directs the Engineer Research and Development 
Center to undertake research on the management and eradication 
of aquatic invasive species and report to Congress with 
recommendations to address the spread and impacts of aquatic 
invasive species.

Section 140. Harmful algal bloom technology demonstration

    This section authorizes a multi-year technology 
demonstration for the Engineer Research and Development Center 
to develop solutions to reduce the occurrence of harmful algal 
blooms.

Section 141. Bubbly Creek, Chicago ecosystem restoration

    This section directs the Corps to enter into a memorandum 
of understanding with the Environmental Protection Agency to 
facilitate ecosystem restoration activities at the Bubbly Creek 
project, Illinois.

Section 142. Operation and maintenance of navigation and hydroelectric 
        facilities

    This section clarifies that operations and maintenance 
activities at Corps navigation facilities are inherently 
governmental functions.

Section 143. Hurricane and storm damage risk reduction

    This section clarifies that extended periods of nourishment 
shall begin on the date of construction of the congressionally 
authorized nourishment.

Section 144. Post-disaster watershed assessments

    This section clarifies that post-disaster watershed 
assessments, carried out pursuant to Section 3024 of WRRA 2014, 
shall be conducted at full Federal expense unless the President 
determines that the territory has the ability to pay the cost 
share for an assessment without the use of non-Federal funds or 
loans.

                           TITLE II--STUDIES

Section 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies

    This section authorizes the Corps to conduct feasibility 
studies for 10 projects for water resources development and 
conservation and other purposes. These feasibility studies were 
submitted in a Report to Congress on Future Water Resources 
Development pursuant to Section 7001 of the Water Resources 
Reform and Development Act of 2014, or were otherwise reviewed 
by Congress. Each of the projects has as its primary purpose, 
one of the following: navigation, hurricane and storm damage 
reduction, flood damage reduction, or ecosystem restoration.

Section 202. Additional studies

    This section directs the Corps to conduct a study along the 
Lower Mississippi River Basin and modify a study along the St. 
Louis Riverfront. These studies were submitted in a Report to 
Congress on Future Water Resources Development pursuant to 
Section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
of 2014, or were otherwise reviewed by Congress.

Section 203. Expedited completion of reports for certain projects

    This section directs the Corps to expedite the completion 
of 20 feasibility studies currently underway. Upon completion 
of the study, if the Corps determines that the project is 
justified, the Corps may proceed directly to preconstruction 
planning, engineering, and design. This section also directs 
the Corps to expedite the completion of post-authorization 
change reports for four projects that are currently underway. 
Additionally, this section directs the Secretary to report to 
Congress on the feasibility of certain modifications in 
carrying out the disposition of the Upper St. Anthony Falls 
Lock and Dam.

   TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS, MODIFICATIONS, AND RELATED PROVISIONS

Section 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects

    This section establishes a process that will lead to the 
deauthorization of $3 billion in previously authorized, yet 
inactive, Corps projects. This section requires the Corps to 
submit a list of inactive projects to Congress that were 
authorized for construction prior to November 8, 2007, have not 
begun planning, design, or construction, or, if projects have 
begun planning, design, or construction, they have not received 
any funds, Federal or non-Federal, in the past six years. After 
a 180-day period of congressional review, the projects on the 
list are automatically deauthorized.

Section 302. Backlog prevention

    This section terminates the authorization for any project 
or separable element of a project authorized for construction 
by this Act after 10 years unless construction has been 
initiated, a post-authorization study has been issued, or the 
authorization has been modified by an Act of Congress. 
Additionally, this section amends the backlog prevention 
provision in Section 6003 of WRRDA 2014 to align with this 
section.

Section 303. Project modifications

    This section modifies the Harbor/South Bay, California and 
the Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina projects in 
accordance with the Report to Congress on Future Water 
Resources Development pursuant to Section 7001 of the Water 
Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, or otherwise 
reviewed by Congress.

Section 304. Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

    This section deauthorizes a portion of the project for 
navigation in Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Section 305. Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut

    This section deauthorizes a portion of the project for 
navigation in Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.

Section 306. Conveyances

    This section authorizes the Corps to convey real property 
owned by the Federal government in Nashville, Tennessee and 
Cheatham County, Tennessee.

Section 307. Clatsop County, Oregon

    This section deauthorizes a portion of the project for 
raising and improving existing levees in Clatsop County, 
Oregon.

Section 308. Kissimmee River restoration, Central and Southern Florida

    This section authorizes the Corps to credit work performed 
by a non-Federal interest in support of the Central and 
Southern Florida, Kissimmee River Restoration project.

Section 309. Lytle and Cajon Creeks, California

    This section deauthorizes a portion of the channel 
improvement project in Lytle and Cajon Creeks, California.

Section 310. Yuba River Basin, California

    This section authorizes a non-federal interest to construct 
new levees in cooperating with the Secretary and at full non-
Federal expense in the Yuba River Basin, California.

                TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE

Section 401. Project authorizations

    This section authorizes seven water resources projects that 
have completed technical review by the Corps and are 
recommended by the Chief of Engineers. The projects are 
authorized to be carried out in accordance with the plan, and 
subject to the conditions, described in the Chief's Reports. 
Each of the projects has as its primary purpose, one of the 
following: navigation, flood risk management, hurricane and 
storm damage risk reduction, or ecosystem restoration. This 
section also authorizes two project modifications for 
previously authorized projects.

         Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported

  In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by 
the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law 
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new 
matter is printed in italic, and existing law in which no 
change is proposed is shown in roman):

                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1986

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
TITLE II--HARBOR DEVELOPMENT

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 203. STUDY OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
                    INTERESTS.

  (a) Submission to Secretary.--
          (1) In general.--A non-Federal interest may undertake 
        a federally authorized feasibility study of a proposed 
        water resources development project and submit the 
        study to the Secretary.
          (2) Guidelines.--To assist non-Federal interests, the 
        Secretary, as soon as practicable, shall issue 
        guidelines for feasibility studies of water resources 
        development projects to provide sufficient information 
        for the formulation of the studies.
  (b) Review by Secretary.--The Secretary shall review each 
feasibility study received under subsection (a)(1) for the 
purpose of determining whether or not the study, and the 
process under which the study was developed, each comply with 
Federal laws and regulations applicable to feasibility studies 
of water resources development projects.
  [(c) Submission to Congress.--Not later than 180 days after 
the date of receipt of a feasibility study of a project under 
subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee 
on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives a report that describes--
          [(1) the results of the Secretary's review of the 
        study under subsection (b), including a determination 
        of whether the project is feasible;
          [(2) any recommendations the Secretary may have 
        concerning the plan or design of the project; and
          [(3) any conditions the Secretary may require for 
        construction of the project.]
  (c) Submission to Congress.--
          (1) Review and submission of studies to congress.--
        Not later than 180 days after the date of receipt of a 
        feasibility study of a project under subsection (a)(1), 
        the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
        Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
        House of Representatives a report that describes--
                  (A) the results of the Secretary's review of 
                the study under subsection (b), including a 
                determination of whether the project is 
                feasible;
                  (B) any recommendations the Secretary may 
                have concerning the plan or design of the 
                project; and
                  (C) any conditions the Secretary may require 
                for construction of the project.
          (2) Limitation.--The completion of the review by the 
        Secretary of a feasibility study that has been 
        submitted under subsection (a)(1) may not be delayed as 
        a result of consideration being given to changes in 
        policy or priority with respect to project 
        consideration.
  (d) Credit.--If a project for which a feasibility study has 
been submitted under subsection (a)(1) is authorized by a 
Federal law enacted after the date of the submission to 
Congress under subsection (c), the Secretary shall credit 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of construction of the 
project an amount equal to the portion of the cost of 
developing the study that would have been the responsibility of 
the United States if the study had been developed by the 
Secretary.
  [(e) Technical Assistance.--At the request of a non-Federal 
interest, the Secretary may provide to the non-Federal interest 
technical assistance relating to any aspect of a feasibility 
study if the non-Federal interest contracts with the Secretary 
to pay all costs of providing such technical assistance.]
  (e) Review and Technical Assistance.--
          (1) Review.--The Secretary may accept and expend 
        funds provided by non-Federal interests to undertake 
        reviews, inspections, certifications, and other 
        activities that are the responsibility of the Secretary 
        in carrying out this section.
          (2) Technical assistance.--At the request of a non-
        Federal interest, the Secretary shall provide to the 
        non-Federal interest technical assistance relating to 
        any aspect of a feasibility study if the non-Federal 
        interest contracts with the Secretary to pay all costs 
        of providing such technical assistance.
          (3) Limitation.--Funds provided by non-Federal 
        interests under this subsection shall not be eligible 
        for credit under subsection (d) or reimbursement.
          (4) Impartial decisionmaking.--In carrying out this 
        section, the Secretary shall ensure that the use of 
        funds accepted from a non-Federal interest will not 
        affect the impartial decisionmaking of the Secretary, 
        either substantively or procedurally.

SEC. 204. CONSTRUCTION OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY NON-
                    FEDERAL INTERESTS.

  (a) Water Resources Development Project Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``water resources development project'' means 
a project recommendation that results from--
          (1) a feasibility report, as such term is defined in 
        section 7001(f) of the Water Resources Reform and 
        Development Act of 2014;
          (2) a completed feasibility study developed under 
        section 203; or
          (3) a final feasibility study for water resources 
        development and conservation and other purposes that is 
        specifically authorized by Congress to be carried out 
        by the Secretary.
  (b) Authority.--
          (1) In general.--A non-Federal interest may carry out 
        a federally authorized water resources development 
        project, or separable element thereof--
                  (A) in accordance with a plan approved by the 
                Secretary for the project or separable element; 
                and
                  (B) subject to any conditions that the 
                Secretary may require, including any conditions 
                specified under section 203(c)(3).
          (2) Conditions.--Before carrying out a water 
        resources development project, or separable element 
        thereof, under this section, a non-Federal interest 
        shall--
                  (A) obtain any permit or approval required in 
                connection with the project or separable 
                element under Federal or State law, except as 
                provided in paragraph (3); and
                  (B) ensure that a final environmental impact 
                statement or environmental assessment, as 
                appropriate, for the project or separable 
                element has been filed.
          (3) Permit exception.--
                  (A) In general.--For a project described in 
                subsection (a)(1) or subsection (a)(3), or a 
                separable element thereof, with respect to 
                which a written agreement described in 
                subparagraph (B) has been entered into, a non-
                Federal interest that carries out a project 
                under this section shall not be required to 
                obtain any Federal permits or approvals that 
                would not be required if the Secretary carried 
                out the project or separable element unless 
                significant new circumstances or information 
                relevant to environmental concerns or 
                compliance have arisen since development of the 
                project recommendation.
                  (B) Written agreement.--For purposes of this 
                paragraph, a written agreement shall provide 
                that the non-Federal interest shall comply with 
                the same legal and technical requirements that 
                would apply if the project or separable element 
                were carried out by the Secretary, including 
                all mitigation required to offset environmental 
                impacts of the project or separable element as 
                determined by the Secretary.
                  (C) Certifications.--Notwithstanding 
                subparagraph (A), if a non-Federal interest 
                carrying out a project under this section 
                would, in the absence of a written agreement 
                entered into under this paragraph, be required 
                to obtain a certification from a State under 
                Federal law to carry out the project, such 
                certification shall still be required if a 
                written agreement is entered into with respect 
                to the project under this paragraph.
  (c) Studies and Engineering.--When requested by an 
appropriate non-Federal interest, the Secretary may undertake 
all necessary studies and engineering for any construction to 
be undertaken under subsection (b), and provide technical 
assistance in obtaining all necessary permits for the 
construction, if the non-Federal interest contracts with the 
Secretary to furnish the United States funds for the studies, 
engineering, or technical assistance in the period during which 
the studies and engineering are being conducted.
  (d) Credit or Reimbursement.--
          (1) General rule.--Subject to paragraph (3), a 
        project or separable element of a project carried out 
        by a non-Federal interest under this section shall be 
        eligible for credit or reimbursement for the Federal 
        share of work carried out on a project or separable 
        element of a project if--
                  (A) before initiation of construction of the 
                project or separable element--
                          (i) the Secretary approves the plans 
                        for construction of the project or 
                        separable element of the project by the 
                        non-Federal interest;
                          (ii) the Secretary determines, before 
                        approval of the plans, that the project 
                        or separable element of the project is 
                        feasible; and
                          (iii) the non-Federal interest enters 
                        into a written agreement with the 
                        Secretary under section 221 of the 
                        Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
                        1962d-5b), including an agreement to 
                        pay the non-Federal share, if any, of 
                        the cost of operation and maintenance 
                        of the project; and
                  (B) the Secretary determines that all Federal 
                laws and regulations applicable to the 
                construction of a water resources development 
                project, and any conditions identified under 
                subsection (b)(1)(B), were complied with by the 
                non-Federal interest during construction of the 
                project or separable element of the project.
          (2) Application of credit.--The Secretary may apply 
        credit toward--
                  (A) the non-Federal share of authorized 
                separable elements of the same project; or
                  (B) subject to the requirements of this 
                section and section 1020 of the Water Resources 
                Reform and Development Act of 2014, at the 
                request of the non-Federal interest, the non-
                Federal share of a different water resources 
                development project.
          (3) Requirements.--The Secretary may only apply 
        credit or provide reimbursement under paragraph (1) 
        if--
                  (A) Congress has authorized construction of 
                the project or separable element of the 
                project[; and];
                  (B) the Secretary certifies that the project 
                has been constructed in accordance with--
                          (i) all applicable permits or 
                        approvals; and
                          (ii) this section[.]; and
                  (C) in the case of reimbursement, 
                appropriations are provided by Congress for 
                such purpose.
          (4) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall regularly 
        monitor and audit any water resources development 
        project, or separable element of a water resources 
        development project, constructed by a non-Federal 
        interest under this section to ensure that--
                  (A) the construction is carried out in 
                compliance with the requirements of this 
                section; and
                  (B) the costs of the construction are 
                reasonable.
          (5) Discrete segments.--
                  (A) In general.--The Secretary may authorize 
                credit or reimbursement under this subsection 
                [for a discrete segment of a] for carrying out 
                a discrete segment of a federally authorized 
                [flood damage reduction] water resources 
                development project, or separable element 
                thereof, before final completion of the project 
                or separable element if--
                          (i) except as provided in clause 
                        (ii), the Secretary determines that the 
                        discrete segment satisfies the 
                        requirements of paragraphs (1) through 
                        (4) in the same manner as the project 
                        or separable element; and
                          (ii) notwithstanding paragraph 
                        (1)(A)(ii), the Secretary determines, 
                        before the approval of the plans under 
                        paragraph (1)(A)(i), that the discrete 
                        segment is technically feasible and 
                        environmentally acceptable.
                  (B) Determination.--Credit or reimbursement 
                may not be made available to a non-Federal 
                interest pursuant to this paragraph until the 
                Secretary determines that--
                          (i) the construction of the discrete 
                        segment for which credit or 
                        reimbursement is requested is complete; 
                        and
                          (ii) the construction is consistent 
                        with the authorization of the 
                        applicable [flood damage reduction] 
                        water resources development project, or 
                        separable element thereof, and the 
                        plans approved under paragraph 
                        (1)(A)(i).
                  (C) Written agreement.--
                          (i) In general.--As part of the 
                        written agreement required under 
                        paragraph (1)(A)(iii), a non-Federal 
                        interest to be eligible for credit or 
                        reimbursement under this paragraph 
                        shall--
                                  (I) identify any discrete 
                                segment that the non-Federal 
                                interest may carry out; and
                                  (II) agree to the completion 
                                of the [flood damage reduction] 
                                water resources development 
                                project, or separable element 
                                thereof, with respect to which 
                                the discrete segment is a part 
                                and establish a timeframe for 
                                such completion.
                          (ii) Remittance.--If a non-Federal 
                        interest fails to complete a [flood 
                        damage reduction] water resources 
                        development project, or separable 
                        element thereof, that it agreed to 
                        complete under clause (i)(II), the non-
                        Federal interest shall remit any 
                        reimbursements received under this 
                        paragraph for a discrete segment of 
                        such project or separable element.
                  (D) Discrete segment defined.--In this 
                paragraph, the term ``discrete segment'' means 
                a physical portion of a [flood damage 
                reduction] water resources development project 
                to be carried out, or separable element 
                thereof--
                          (i) described by a non-Federal 
                        interest in a written agreement 
                        required under paragraph (1)(A)(iii); 
                        and
                          (ii) that the non-Federal interest 
                        can operate and maintain, independently 
                        and without creating a hazard, in 
                        advance of final completion of the 
                        [flood damage reduction] water 
                        resources development project, or 
                        separable element thereof.
  (e) Notification of Committees.--If a non-Federal interest 
notifies the Secretary that the non-Federal interest intends to 
carry out a project, or separable element thereof, under this 
section, the Secretary shall provide written notice to the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives concerning the intent of the non-Federal 
interest.
  (f) Operation and Maintenance.--Whenever a non-Federal 
interest carries out improvements to a federally authorized 
harbor or inland harbor, the Secretary shall be responsible for 
operation and maintenance in accordance with section 101(b) 
if--
          (1) before construction of the improvements--
                  (A) the Secretary determines that the 
                improvements are feasible and consistent with 
                the purposes of this title; and
                  (B) the Secretary and the non-Federal 
                interest execute a written agreement relating 
                to operation and maintenance of the 
                improvements;
          (2) the Secretary certifies that the project or 
        separable element of the project is constructed in 
        accordance with applicable permits and appropriate 
        engineering and design standards; and
          (3) the Secretary does not find that the project or 
        separable element is no longer feasible.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 210. [AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS]  FUNDING FOR HARBOR 
                    NAVIGATION.

  (a) Trust Fund.--There are authorized to be appropriated out 
of the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, established by section 
9505 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, for each fiscal year 
such sums as may be necessary to pay--
          (1) 100 percent of the eligible operations and 
        maintenance costs of those portions of the Saint 
        Lawrence Seaway operated and maintained by the Saint 
        Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation for such fiscal 
        year; and
          (2) up to 100 percent of the eligible operations and 
        maintenance costs assigned to commercial navigation of 
        all harbors and inland harbors within the United 
        States.
  (b) General Fund.--There are authorized to be appropriated 
out of the general fund of the Treasury of the United States 
for each fiscal year such sums as may be necessary to pay the 
balance of all eligible operations and maintenance costs not 
provided by payments from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund 
under this section.
  (c) Use of Collected Funds in Fiscal Year 2029 and 
Thereafter.--
          (1) Use of funds.--In addition to amounts 
        appropriated under subsections (a) and (b), there shall 
        be available to the Secretary, out of the Harbor 
        Maintenance Trust Fund, without further appropriation, 
        for fiscal year 2029 and each fiscal year thereafter, 
        such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes 
        of subsection (a)(2).
          (2) Availability of amounts.--Amounts made available 
        under this subsection shall remain available until 
        expended.
  [(c)] (d) Operation and Maintenance of Harbor Projects.--
          (1) In general.--To the maximum extent practicable, 
        the Secretary shall make expenditures to pay for 
        operation and maintenance costs of the harbors and 
        inland harbors referred to in subsection (a)(2), 
        including expenditures of funds appropriated from the 
        Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, based on an equitable 
        allocation of funds among all such harbors and inland 
        harbors.
          (2) Criteria.--
                  (A) In general.--In determining an equitable 
                allocation of funds under paragraph (1), the 
                Secretary shall--
                          (i) consider the information obtained 
                        in the assessment conducted under 
                        [subsection (e)] subsection (f);
                          (ii) consider the national and 
                        regional significance of harbor 
                        operations and maintenance; and
                          (iii) as appropriate, consider 
                        national security and military 
                        readiness needs.
                  (B) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not 
                allocate funds under paragraph (1) based solely 
                on the tonnage transiting through a harbor.
          (3) Emerging harbor projects.--Notwithstanding any 
        other provision of this subsection, in making 
        expenditures under paragraph (1) for each fiscal year, 
        the Secretary shall allocate for operation and 
        maintenance costs of emerging harbor projects an amount 
        that is not less than 10 percent of the funds made 
        available under this section for fiscal year 2012 to 
        pay the costs described in subsection (a)(2).
          (4) Management of great lakes navigation system.--To 
        sustain effective and efficient operation and 
        maintenance of the Great Lakes Navigation System, 
        including any navigation feature in the Great Lakes 
        that is a Federal responsibility with respect to 
        operation and maintenance, the Secretary shall manage 
        all of the individually authorized projects in the 
        Great Lakes Navigation System as components of a 
        single, comprehensive system, recognizing the 
        interdependence of the projects.
  [(d)] (e) Prioritization.--
          (1) Priority.--
                  (A) In general.--For each fiscal year, if 
                priority funds are available, the Secretary 
                shall use at least 10 percent of such funds for 
                emerging harbor projects.
                  (B) Additional considerations.--For each 
                fiscal year, of the priority funds available, 
                the Secretary shall use--
                          (i) not less than 5 percent of such 
                        funds for underserved harbor projects; 
                        and
                          (ii) not less than 10 percent of such 
                        funds for projects that are located 
                        within the Great Lakes Navigation 
                        System.
                  (C) Underserved harbors.--In determining 
                which underserved harbor projects shall receive 
                funds under this paragraph, the Secretary shall 
                consider--
                          (i) the total quantity of commerce 
                        supported by the water body on which 
                        the project is located; and
                          (ii) the minimum width and depth 
                        that--
                                  (I) would be necessary at the 
                                underserved harbor project to 
                                provide sufficient clearance 
                                for fully loaded commercial 
                                vessels using the underserved 
                                harbor project to maneuver 
                                safely; and
                                  (II) does not exceed the 
                                constructed width and depth of 
                                the authorized navigation 
                                project.
          (2) Expanded uses.--
                  (A) Definition of eligible harbor or inland 
                harbor defined.--In this paragraph, the term 
                ``eligible harbor or inland harbor'' means a 
                harbor or inland harbor at which the total 
                amount of harbor maintenance taxes collected in 
                the immediately preceding 3 fiscal years 
                exceeds the value of the work carried out for 
                the harbor or inland harbor using amounts from 
                the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund during those 
                3 fiscal years.
                  (B) Use of expanded uses funds.--
                          (i) Fiscal years 2015 through 2024.--
                        For each of fiscal years 2015 through 
                        2024, of the priority funds available, 
                        the Secretary shall use not less than 
                        10 percent of such funds for expanded 
                        uses carried out at an eligible harbor 
                        or inland harbor.
                          (ii) Subsequent fiscal years.--For 
                        fiscal year 2025 and each fiscal year 
                        thereafter, the Secretary shall use not 
                        less than 10 percent of the priority 
                        funds available for expanded uses 
                        carried out at an eligible harbor or 
                        inland harbor.
                  (C) Prioritization.--In allocating funds 
                under this paragraph, the Secretary shall give 
                priority to projects at eligible harbors or 
                inland harbors for which the difference, 
                calculated in dollars, is greatest between--
                          (i) the total amount of funding made 
                        available for projects at that eligible 
                        harbor or inland harbor from the Harbor 
                        Maintenance Trust Fund in the 
                        immediately preceding 3 fiscal years; 
                        and
                          (ii) the total amount of harbor 
                        maintenance taxes collected at that 
                        harbor or inland harbor in the 
                        immediately preceding 3 fiscal years.
          (3) Remaining funds.--
                  (A) In general.--For each of fiscal years 
                2015 through 2024, if after fully funding all 
                projects eligible for funding under paragraphs 
                (1)(B) and (2)(B)(i), priority funds made 
                available under those paragraphs remain 
                unobligated, the Secretary shall use those 
                remaining funds to pay for operation and 
                maintenance costs of any harbor or inland 
                harbor referred to in subsection (a)(2) based 
                on an equitable allocation of those funds among 
                the harbors and inland harbors.
                  (B) Criteria.--In determining an equitable 
                allocation of funds under subparagraph (A), the 
                Secretary shall--
                          (i) use the criteria specified in 
                        [subsection (c)(2)(A)] subsection 
                        (d)(2)(A); and
                          (ii) make amounts available in 
                        accordance with the requirements of 
                        paragraph (1)(A).
          (4) Emergency expenditures.--Nothing in this 
        subsection prohibits the Secretary from making an 
        expenditure to pay for the operation and maintenance 
        costs of a specific harbor or inland harbor, including 
        the transfer of funding from the operation and 
        maintenance of a separate project, if--
                  (A) the Secretary determines that the action 
                is necessary to address the navigation needs of 
                a harbor or inland harbor where safe navigation 
                has been severely restricted due to an 
                unforeseen event; and
                  (B) the Secretary provides within 90 days of 
                the action notice and information on the need 
                for the action to the Committee on Environment 
                and Public Works and the Committee on 
                Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee 
                on Transportation and Infrastructure and the 
                Committee on Appropriations of the House of 
                Representatives.
  [(e)] (f) Assessment of Harbors and Inland Harbors.--
          (1) In general.--Not later than 270 days after the 
        date of enactment of this subsection, and biennially 
        thereafter, the Secretary [shall assess the] shall 
        assess, and issue a report to Congress on, the 
        operation and maintenance needs and uses of the harbors 
        and inland harbors referred to in subsection (a)(2).
          (2) Assessment of harbor needs and activities.--
                  (A) Total operation and maintenance needs of 
                harbors.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the 
                Secretary shall identify--
                          (i) the total future costs required 
                        to achieve and maintain the constructed 
                        width and depth for the harbors and 
                        inland harbors referred to in 
                        subsection (a)(2); and
                          (ii) the total expected costs for 
                        expanded uses at eligible harbors or 
                        inland harbors referred to in 
                        [subsection (d)(2)] subsection (e)(2).
                  (B) Uses of harbors and inland harbors.--In 
                carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 
                identify current uses (and, to the extent 
                practicable, assess the national, regional, and 
                local benefits of such uses) of harbors and 
                inland harbors referred to in subsection 
                (a)(2), including the use of those harbors 
                for--
                          (i) commercial navigation, including 
                        the movement of goods;
                          (ii) domestic trade;
                          (iii) international trade;
                          (iv) commercial fishing;
                          (v) subsistence, including use by 
                        Indian tribes (as defined in section 4 
                        of the Indian Self-Determination and 
                        Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 
                        450b)) for subsistence and ceremonial 
                        purposes;
                          (vi) use as a harbor of refuge;
                          (vii) transportation of persons;
                          (viii) purposes relating to domestic 
                        energy production, including the 
                        fabrication, servicing, or supply of 
                        domestic offshore energy production 
                        facilities;
                          (ix) activities of the Secretary of 
                        the department in which the Coast Guard 
                        is operating;
                          (x) activities of the Secretary of 
                        the Navy;
                          (xi) public health and safety related 
                        equipment for responding to coastal and 
                        inland emergencies;
                          (xii) recreation purposes; and
                          (xiii) other authorized purposes.
                  (C) Opportunities for beneficial use of 
                dredged materials.--In carrying out paragraph 
                (1), the Secretary shall identify potential 
                opportunities for the beneficial use of dredged 
                materials obtained from harbors and inland 
                harbors referred to in subsection (a)(2), 
                including projects eligible under section 1122 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 
                (130 Stat. 1645; 33 U.S.C. 2326 note).
          (3) Report to congress.--
                  (A) In general.--For fiscal year 2016, and 
                biennially thereafter, in conjunction with the 
                President's annual budget submission to 
                Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, 
                United States Code, the Secretary shall submit 
                to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                Works and the Committee on Appropriations of 
                the Senate and the Committee on Transportation 
                and Infrastructure and the Committee on 
                Appropriations of the House of Representatives 
                a report that, with respect to harbors and 
                inland harbors referred to in subsection 
                (a)(2)--
                          (i) identifies the operation and 
                        maintenance costs associated with the 
                        harbors and inland harbors, including 
                        those costs required to achieve and 
                        maintain the constructed width and 
                        depth for the harbors and inland 
                        harbors and the costs for expanded uses 
                        at eligible harbors and inland harbors, 
                        on a project-by-project basis;
                          (ii) identifies the amount of funding 
                        requested in the President's budget for 
                        the operation and maintenance costs 
                        associated with the harbors and inland 
                        harbors, on a project-by-project basis;
                          (iii) identifies the unmet operation 
                        and maintenance needs associated with 
                        the harbors and inland harbors, on a 
                        project-by-project basis; and
                          (iv) identifies the harbors and 
                        inland harbors for which the President 
                        will allocate funding over the 
                        subsequent 5 fiscal years for operation 
                        and maintenance activities, on a 
                        project-by-project basis, including the 
                        amounts to be allocated for such 
                        purposes.
                  (B) Additional requirement.--In the first 
                report submitted under subparagraph (A) 
                following the date of enactment of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 2016, the 
                Secretary shall identify, to the maximum extent 
                practicable, transportation cost savings 
                realized by achieving and maintaining the 
                constructed width and depth for the harbors and 
                inland harbors referred to in subsection 
                (a)(2), on a project-by-project basis.
                  (C) Public availability.--The Secretary shall 
                make the report submitted under subparagraph 
                (A) available to the public, including on the 
                Internet.
  [(f)] (g) Definitions.--In this section:
          (1) Constructed width and depth.--The term 
        ``constructed width and depth'' means the width and 
        depth to which a project has been constructed, which 
        may not exceed the authorized width and depth of the 
        project.
          (2) Emerging harbor project.--The term ``emerging 
        harbor project'' means a project that is assigned to a 
        harbor or inland harbor referred to in subsection 
        (a)(2) that transits less than 1,000,000 tons of cargo 
        annually.
          (3) Expanded uses.--The term ``expanded uses'' means 
        the following activities:
                  (A) The maintenance dredging of a berth in a 
                harbor that is accessible to a Federal 
                navigation project and that benefits commercial 
                navigation at the harbor.
                  (B) The maintenance dredging and disposal of 
                legacy-contaminated sediment, and sediment 
                unsuitable for open water disposal, if--
                          (i) such dredging and disposal 
                        benefits commercial navigation at the 
                        harbor; and
                          (ii) such sediment is located in and 
                        affects the maintenance of a Federal 
                        navigation project or is located in a 
                        berth that is accessible to a Federal 
                        navigation project.
          (4) Great lakes navigation system.--The term ``Great 
        Lakes Navigation System'' includes--
                  (A)(i) Lake Superior;
                  (ii) Lake Huron;
                  (iii) Lake Michigan;
                  (iv) Lake Erie; and
                  (v) Lake Ontario;
                  (B) all connecting waters between the lakes 
                referred to in subparagraph (A) used for 
                commercial navigation;
                  (C) any navigation features in the lakes 
                referred to in subparagraph (A) or waters 
                described in subparagraph (B) that are a 
                Federal operation or maintenance 
                responsibility; and
                  (D) areas of the Saint Lawrence River that 
                are operated or maintained by the Federal 
                Government for commercial navigation.
          (5) Harbor maintenance tax.--The term ``harbor 
        maintenance tax'' means the amounts collected under 
        section 4461 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
          (6) High-use harbor project.--The term ``high-use 
        harbor project'' means a project that is assigned to a 
        harbor or inland harbor referred to in subsection 
        (a)(2) that transits not less than 10,000,000 tons of 
        cargo annually.
          (7) Moderate-use harbor project.--The term 
        ``moderate-use harbor project'' means a project that is 
        assigned to a harbor or inland harbor referred to in 
        subsection (a)(2) that transits annually--
                  (A) more than 1,000,000 tons of cargo; but
                  (B) less than 10,000,000 tons of cargo.
          (8) Priority funds.--The term ``priority funds'' 
        means the difference between--
                  (A) the total funds that are made available 
                under this section to pay the costs described 
                in subsection (a)(2) for a fiscal year; and
                  (B) the total funds made available under this 
                section to pay the costs described in 
                subsection (a)(2) in fiscal year 2012.
          (9) Underserved harbor project.--
                  (A) In general.--The term ``underserved 
                harbor project'' means a project that is 
                assigned to a harbor or inland harbor referred 
                to in subsection (a)(2)--
                          (i) that is a moderate-use harbor 
                        project or an emerging harbor project;
                          (ii) that has been maintained at less 
                        than the constructed width and depth of 
                        the project during each of the 
                        preceding 6 fiscal years; and
                          (iii) for which State and local 
                        investments in infrastructure have been 
                        made at those projects during the 
                        preceding 6 fiscal years.
                  (B) Administration.--For purposes of this 
                paragraph, State and local investments in 
                infrastructure shall include infrastructure 
                investments made using amounts made available 
                for activities under section 105(a)(9) of the 
                Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 
                (42 U.S.C. 5305(a)(9)).

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                    TITLE X--PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATION

  Sec. 1001. (a) Any project authorized for construction by 
this Act shall not be authorized after the last day of the 5-
year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act 
unless during such period funds have been obligated for 
construction, including planning and designing, of such 
project.
  (b)(1) Not later than one year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a list of 
unconstructed projects, or unconstructed separable elements of 
projects, which have been authorized, but have received no 
obligations during the 10 full fiscal years preceding the 
transmittal of such list. A project or separable element 
included in such list is not authorized after December 31, 
1989, if the funds have not been obligated for construction of 
such project or element after the date of enactment of this Act 
and before December 31, 1989.
  (2) Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public Law 104-66 (31 
U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734), every year after the 
transmittal of the list under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
shall transmit to Congress a list of projects or separable 
elements of projects which have been authorized, but have 
received no obligations during the 5 full fiscal years 
preceding the transmittal of such list. Upon submission of such 
list to Congress, the Secretary shall notify each Senator in 
whose State, and each Member of the House of Representatives in 
whose district, a project (including any part thereof) on such 
list would be located. A project or separable element included 
in such list is not authorized after the date which is the last 
date of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the 
list is so transmitted if funds have not been obligated for the 
planning, design, or construction of such project or element 
during such period.
          (3) Minimum funding list.--At the end of each fiscal 
        year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
        Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
        House of Representatives, and make available on a 
        publicly accessible Internet site in a manner that is 
        downloadable, searchable, and sortable, a list of--
                  (A) projects or separable elements of 
                projects authorized for construction for which 
                funding has been obligated during the current 
                fiscal year or any of the 6 preceding fiscal 
                years;
                  (B) the amount of funding obligated for each 
                such project or separable element per fiscal 
                year;
                  (C) the current phase of each such project or 
                separable element of a project; and
                  (D) the amount required to complete the 
                current phase of each such project or separable 
                element.
          (4) Comprehensive backlog and operation and 
        maintenance report.--
                  [(A) In general.--The Secretary shall compile 
                and publish a complete list of all projects and 
                separable elements of projects of the Corps of 
                Engineers that are authorized for construction 
                but have not been completed.]
                  (A) In general.--The Secretary shall compile 
                and publish--
                          (i) a complete list of all projects 
                        and separable elements of projects of 
                        the Corps of Engineers that are 
                        authorized for construction but have 
                        not been completed; and
                          (ii) a list of major Federal 
                        operation and maintenance needs of 
                        projects and properties under the 
                        control of the Corps of Engineers.
                  (B) Required backlog information.--The 
                Secretary shall include on the list developed 
                under [subparagraph (A)] subparagraph (A)(i) 
                for each project and separable element on that 
                list--
                          (i) the date of authorization of the 
                        project or separable element, including 
                        any subsequent modifications to the 
                        original authorization;
                          (ii) the original budget authority 
                        for the project or separable element;
                          (iii) a brief description of the 
                        project or separable element;
                          (iv) the estimated date of completion 
                        of the project or separable element;
                          (v) the estimated cost of completion 
                        of the project or separable element; 
                        and
                          (vi) any amounts appropriated for the 
                        project or separable element that 
                        remain unobligated.
                  (C) Required operation and maintenance 
                information.--The Secretary shall include on 
                the list developed under subparagraph (A)(ii), 
                for each project and property under the control 
                of the Corps of Engineers on that list--
                          (i) the authority under which the 
                        project was authorized or the property 
                        was acquired by the Corps of Engineers;
                          (ii) a brief description of the 
                        project or property;
                          (iii) an estimate of the Federal 
                        costs to meet the major operation and 
                        maintenance needs at the project or 
                        property; and
                          (iv) an estimate of unmet or deferred 
                        operation and maintenance needs at the 
                        project or property.
                  [(C)] (D) Publication.--
                          (i) In general.--[Not later than 1 
                        year after the date of enactment of 
                        this paragraph, the Secretary shall 
                        submit a copy of the list] For fiscal 
                        year 2019, and biennially thereafter, 
                        in conjunction with the President's 
                        annual budget submission to Congress 
                        under section 1105(a) of title 31, 
                        United States Code, the Secretary shall 
                        submit a copy of the lists developed 
                        under subparagraph (A) to--
                                  (I) the Committee on 
                                Environment and Public Works of 
                                the Senate and the Committee on 
                                Transportation and 
                                Infrastructure of the House of 
                                Representatives; and
                                  (II) the Director of the 
                                Office of Management and 
                                Budget.
                          (ii) Public availability.--Beginning 
                        on the date the Secretary submits the 
                        report to Congress under clause (i), 
                        the Secretary shall make a copy of the 
                        [list] lists available on a publicly 
                        accessible Internet site in a manner 
                        that is downloadable, searchable, and 
                        sortable.
  (c) The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a 
list of any projects or separable elements that are 
deauthorized under this section.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

TITLE XI--MISCELLANEOUS PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 1156. COST SHARING PROVISIONS FOR THE TERRITORIES AND INDIAN 
                    TRIBES.

  (a) In general.--The Secretary shall waive local cost-sharing 
requirements up to $200,000 for all studies and projects--
          (1) in American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana 
        Islands, the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Trust 
        Territory of the Pacific Islands; and
          (2) for any Indian tribe (as defined in [section 102 
        of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 
        1994 (25 U.S.C. 5130)] section 4(e) of the Indian Self-
        Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 
        5304(e))).
  (b) Inflation Adjustment.--The Secretary shall adjust the 
dollar amount specified in subsection (a) for inflation for the 
period beginning on November 17, 1986, and ending on the date 
of enactment of this subsection.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                              ----------                              

                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2007

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
TITLE VII--LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 7007. NON-FEDERAL COST SHARE.

  (a) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in accordance with 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a study or project 
under this title the cost of work carried out in the coastal 
Louisiana ecosystem by the non-Federal interest for the project 
before, on, or after the date of the execution of the 
partnership agreement for the study or project. Notwithstanding 
section 221(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)(C)(i)), the Secretary may provide credit 
for work carried out during the period beginning on November 8, 
2007, and ending on the date of enactment of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2018 by the non-Federal interest 
for a project under this title if the Secretary determines that 
the work is integral to the project and was carried out in 
accordance with the laws specified in section 5014(i)(2)(A) of 
the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 
Stat. 1331) and all other applicable Federal laws.
  (b) Sources of Funds.--The non-Federal interest may use, and 
the Secretary shall accept, funds provided by a Federal agency 
under any other Federal program, to satisfy, in whole or in 
part, the non-Federal share of the cost of the study or project 
if the Federal agency that provides the funds determines that 
the funds are authorized to be used to carry out the study or 
project.
  (c) Nongovernmental Organizations.--A nongovernmental 
organization shall be eligible to contribute all or a portion 
of the non-Federal share of the cost of a project under this 
title.
  (d) Treatment of Credit Between Projects.--The value of any 
land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged 
material disposal areas and the costs of planning, design, and 
construction work provided by the non-Federal interest that 
exceed the non-Federal cost share for a study or project under 
this title may be applied toward the non-Federal cost share for 
any other study or project carried out under this title.
  (e) Periodic Monitoring.--
          (1) In general.--To ensure that the contributions of 
        the non-Federal interest equal the non-Federal share of 
        the cost of a study or project under this title during 
        each 5-year period beginning after the date of 
        commencement of the first study or project under this 
        title, the Secretary shall--
                  (A) monitor for each study or project under 
                this title the non-Federal provision of cash, 
                in-kind services and materials, and land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and 
                disposal areas; and
                  (B) manage the requirement of the non-Federal 
                interest to provide for each such study or 
                project cash, in-kind services and materials, 
                and land, easements, rights-of-way, 
                relocations, and disposal areas.
          (2) Other monitoring.--The Secretary shall conduct 
        monitoring separately for the study phase, construction 
        phase, preconstruction engineering and design phase, 
        and planning phase for each project authorized on or 
        after the date of enactment of this Act for all or any 
        portion of the coastal Louisiana ecosystem.
  (f) Audits.--Credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and disposal areas (including land value and 
incidental costs) provided under this section, and the cost of 
work provided under this section, shall be subject to audit by 
the Secretary.
  (g) Definition of Study or Project.--In this section, the 
term ``study or project'' includes any eligible activity that 
is--
          (1) carried out pursuant to the coastal Louisiana 
        ecosystem science and technology program authorized 
        under section 7006(a); and
          (2) in accordance with the restoration plan.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

TITLE IX--NATIONAL LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 9005. LEVEE SAFETY INITIATIVE.

  (a) Establishment.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
Administrator, shall carry out a levee safety initiative.
  (b) Management.--The Secretary shall appoint--
          (1) an administrator of the levee safety initiative; 
        and
          (2) such staff as are necessary to implement the 
        initiative.
  (c) Levee Safety Guidelines.--
          (1) Establishment.--Not later than 1 year after the 
        date of enactment of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 2016, the Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Administrator and in coordination with State, regional, 
        local, and tribal governments and organizations with 
        expertise in levee safety, shall establish a set of 
        voluntary, comprehensive, national levee safety 
        guidelines that--
                  (A) are available for common, uniform use by 
                all Federal, State, regional, local, and tribal 
                agencies;
                  (B) incorporate policies, procedures, 
                standards, and criteria for a range of levee 
                types, canal structures, and related facilities 
                and features; and
                  (C) provide for adaptation to local, 
                regional, or watershed conditions.
          (2) Requirement.--The policies, procedures, 
        standards, and criteria under paragraph (1)(B) shall be 
        developed taking into consideration the levee hazard 
        potential classification system established under 
        subsection (d).
          (3) Incorporation.--The guidelines shall address, to 
        the maximum extent practicable--
                  (A) the activities and practices carried out 
                by State, regional, local, and tribal 
                governments and the private sector to safely 
                build, regulate, operate, and maintain levees; 
                and
                  (B) Federal activities that facilitate State, 
                regional, or tribal efforts to develop and 
                implement effective State, regional, or tribal 
                programs for the safety of levees, including 
                levee inspection, levee rehabilitation, locally 
                developed floodplain management, and public 
                education and training programs.
          (4) Consideration by Federal agencies.--To the 
        maximum extent practicable, all Federal agencies shall 
        consider the levee safety guidelines in carrying out 
        activities relating to the management of levees.
          (5) Public comment.--Prior to finalizing the 
        guidelines under this subsection, the Secretary shall--
                  (A) issue draft guidelines for public 
                comment, including comment by States, regional 
                districts, Indian tribes, non-Federal 
                interests, and other appropriate stakeholders; 
                and
                  (B) consider any comments received in the 
                development of final guidelines.
  (d) Hazard Potential Classification system.--
          (1) Establishment.--The Secretary shall establish a 
        hazard potential classification system for use under 
        the levee safety initiative and participating programs.
          (2) Revision.--The Secretary shall review and, as 
        necessary, revise the hazard potential classification 
        system not less frequently than once every 5 years.
          (3) Consistency.--The hazard potential classification 
        system established pursuant to this subsection shall be 
        consistent with and incorporated into the levee safety 
        action classification tool developed by the Corps of 
        Engineers.
  (e) Technical Assistance and Materials.--
          (1) Establishment.--The Secretary, in consultation 
        with the Administrator, shall provide technical 
        assistance and training to promote levee safety and 
        assist States, regional districts, Indian tribes, 
        communities, and levee owners in--
                  (A) developing levee safety programs;
                  (B) identifying and reducing flood risks 
                associated with levees;
                  (C) identifying local actions that may be 
                carried out to reduce flood risks in leveed 
                areas; and
                  (D) rehabilitating, improving, replacing, 
                reconfiguring, modifying, and removing levees 
                and levee systems.
          (2) Eligibility.--To be eligible to receive technical 
        assistance under this subsection, a State shall--
                  (A) be in the process of establishing or have 
                in effect a State levee safety program under 
                which a State levee safety agency, in 
                accordance with State law, carries out the 
                guidelines established under subsection (c)(1); 
                and
                  (B) allocate sufficient funds in the budget 
                of that State to carry out that State levee 
                safety program.
          (3) Work plans.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with each State receiving technical 
        assistance under this subsection to develop a work plan 
        necessary for the State levee safety program of that 
        State to reach a level of program performance that 
        meets the guidelines established under subsection 
        (c)(1).
  (f) Public Education and Awareness.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary, in coordination with 
        the Administrator, shall carry out public education and 
        awareness efforts relating to the levee safety 
        initiative.
          (2) Contents.--In carrying out the efforts under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary and the Administrator 
        shall--
                  (A) educate individuals living in leveed 
                areas regarding the risks of living in those 
                areas; and
                  (B) promote consistency in the transmission 
                of information regarding levees among Federal 
                agencies and regarding risk communication at 
                the State and local levels.
  (g) State, Regional, and Tribal Levee Safety Program.--
          (1) Guidelines.--
                  (A) In general.--Not later than 1 year after 
                the date of enactment of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 2016, in consultation with 
                the Administrator, the Secretary shall issue 
                guidelines that establish the minimum 
                components necessary for recognition of a 
                State, regional, or tribal levee safety program 
                as a participating program.
                  (B) Guideline contents.--The guidelines under 
                subparagraph (A) shall include provisions and 
                procedures requiring each participating State, 
                regional district, and Indian tribe to certify 
                to the Secretary that the State, regional 
                district, or Indian tribe, as applicable--
                          (i) has the authority to participate 
                        in the levee safety initiative;
                          (ii) can receive funds under this 
                        title;
                          (iii) has adopted any levee safety 
                        guidelines developed under this title;
                          (iv) will carry out levee 
                        inspections;
                          (v) will carry out, consistent with 
                        applicable requirements, flood risk 
                        management and any emergency action 
                        planning procedures the Secretary 
                        determines to be necessary relating to 
                        levees;
                          (vi) will carry out public education 
                        and awareness activities consistent 
                        with the efforts carried out under 
                        subsection (f); and
                          (vii) will collect and share 
                        information regarding the location and 
                        condition of levees, including for 
                        inclusion in the national levee 
                        database.
                  (C) Public comment.--Prior to finalizing the 
                guidelines under this paragraph, the Secretary 
                shall--
                          (i) issue draft guidelines for public 
                        comment; and
                          (ii) consider any comments received 
                        in the development of final guidelines.
          (2) Assistance to states, regional districts, and 
        indian tribes.--
                  (A) Establishment.--The Administrator may 
                provide assistance, subject to the availability 
                of funding specified in appropriations Acts for 
                Federal Emergency Management Agency activities 
                pursuant to this title and subject to amounts 
                available under subparagraph (E), to States, 
                regional districts, and Indian tribes in 
                establishing participating programs, conducting 
                levee inventories, and improving levee safety 
                programs in accordance with subparagraph (B).
                  (B) Requirements.--To be eligible to receive 
                assistance under this section, a State, 
                regional district, or Indian tribe shall--
                          (i) meet the requirements of a 
                        participating program established by 
                        the guidelines issued under paragraph 
                        (1);
                          (ii) use not less than 25 percent of 
                        any amounts received to identify and 
                        assess non-Federal levees within the 
                        State or regional district or on land 
                        of the Indian tribe;
                          (iii) submit to the Secretary and 
                        Administrator any information collected 
                        by the State, regional district, or 
                        Indian tribe in carrying out this 
                        subsection for inclusion in the 
                        national levee safety database; and
                          (iv) identify actions to address 
                        hazard mitigation activities associated 
                        with levees and leveed areas identified 
                        in the hazard mitigation plan of the 
                        State approved by the Administrator of 
                        the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
                        under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
                        Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
                        U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).
                  (C) Measures to assess effectiveness.--
                          (i) In general.--Not later than 1 
                        year after the date of enactment of 
                        this subsection, the Administrator 
                        shall implement quantifiable 
                        performance measures and metrics to 
                        assess the effectiveness of the 
                        assistance provided in accordance with 
                        subparagraph (A).
                          (ii) Considerations.--In assessing 
                        the effectiveness of assistance under 
                        clause (i), the Administrator shall 
                        consider the degree to which the State, 
                        regional, or tribal program--
                                  (I) ensures that human lives 
                                and property that are protected 
                                by new and existing levees are 
                                safe;
                                  (II) encourages the use of 
                                appropriate engineering 
                                policies, procedures, and 
                                technical practices for levee 
                                site investigation, design, 
                                construction, operation and 
                                maintenance, inspection, 
                                assessment, and emergency 
                                preparedness;
                                  (III) develops and supports 
                                public education and awareness 
                                projects to increase public 
                                acceptance and support of levee 
                                safety programs and provide 
                                information;
                                  (IV) builds public awareness 
                                of the residual risks 
                                associated with living in levee 
                                protected areas; and
                                  (V) develops technical 
                                assistance materials, seminars, 
                                and guidelines to improve the 
                                security of levees of the 
                                United States.
                  (D) Maintenance of effort.--Technical 
                assistance or grants may not be provided to a 
                State under this subsection during a fiscal 
                year unless the State enters into an agreement 
                with the Administrator to ensure that the State 
                will maintain during that fiscal year aggregate 
                expenditures for programs to ensure levee 
                safety that equal or exceed the average annual 
                level of such expenditures for the State for 
                the 2 fiscal years preceding that fiscal year.
                  (E) Authorization of appropriations.--
                          (i) In general.--There is authorized 
                        to be appropriated to the Administrator 
                        to carry out this subsection 
                        $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
                        [2015 through 2019] 2019 through 2023.
                          (ii) Allocation.--For each fiscal 
                        year, amounts made available under this 
                        subparagraph shall be allocated among 
                        the States, regional districts, and 
                        Indian tribes as follows:
                                  (I) \1/3\ among States, 
                                regional districts, and Indian 
                                tribes that qualify for 
                                assistance under this 
                                subsection.
                                  (II) \2/3\ among States, 
                                regional districts, and Indian 
                                tribes that qualify for 
                                assistance under this 
                                subsection, to each such State, 
                                regional district, or Indian 
                                tribe in the proportion that--
                                          (aa) the miles of 
                                        levees in the State or 
                                        regional district or on 
                                        the land of the Indian 
                                        tribe that are listed 
                                        on the inventory of 
                                        levees; bears to
                                          (bb) the miles of 
                                        levees in all States 
                                        and regional districts 
                                        and on the land of all 
                                        Indian tribes that are 
                                        in the national levee 
                                        database.
                          (iii) Maximum Amount of Allocation.--
                        The amounts allocated to a State, 
                        regional district, or Indian tribe 
                        under this subparagraph shall not 
                        exceed 50 percent of the reasonable 
                        cost of implementing the State, 
                        regional, or tribal levee safety 
                        program.
                  (F) Prohibition.--No amounts made available 
                to the Administrator under this title shall be 
                used for levee construction, rehabilitation, 
                repair, operations, or maintenance.
  (h) Levee Rehabilitation Assistance Program.--
          (1) Establishment.--The Secretary shall provide 
        assistance to States, regional districts, Indian 
        tribes, and local governments relating to addressing 
        flood mitigation activities that result in an overall 
        reduction in flood risk.
          (2) Requirements.--To be eligible to receive 
        assistance under this subsection, a State, regional 
        district, Indian tribe, or local government shall--
                  (A) participate in, and comply with, all 
                applicable Federal floodplain management and 
                flood insurance programs;
                  (B) have in place a hazard mitigation plan 
                that--
                          (i) includes all levee risks; and
                          (ii) complies with the Disaster 
                        Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-
                        390; 114 Stat. 1552);
                  (C) submit to the Secretary an application at 
                such time, in such manner, and containing such 
                information as the Secretary may require;
                  (D) commit to provide normal operation and 
                maintenance of the project for the 50 year-
                period following completion of rehabilitation; 
                and
                  (E) comply with such minimum eligibility 
                requirements as the Secretary, in consultation 
                with the committee, may establish to ensure 
                that each owner and operator of a levee under a 
                participating State, regional, or tribal levee 
                safety program--
                          (i) acts in accordance with the 
                        guidelines developed under subsection 
                        (c); and
                          (ii) carries out activities relating 
                        to the public in the leveed area in 
                        accordance with the hazard mitigation 
                        plan described in subparagraph (B).
          (3) Floodplain management plans.--
                  (A) In general.--Not later than 1 year after 
                the date of execution of a project agreement 
                for assistance under this subsection, a State, 
                regional district, Indian tribe, or local 
                government shall prepare a floodplain 
                management plan in accordance with the 
                guidelines under subparagraph (D) to reduce the 
                impacts of future flood events in each 
                applicable leveed area.
                  (B) Inclusions.--A plan under subparagraph 
                (A) shall address--
                          (i) potential measures, practices, 
                        and policies to reduce loss of life, 
                        injuries, damage to property and 
                        facilities, public expenditures, and 
                        other adverse impacts of flooding in 
                        each applicable leveed area;
                          (ii) plans for flood fighting and 
                        evacuation; and
                          (iii) public education and awareness 
                        of flood risks.
                  (C) Implementation.--Not later than 1 year 
                after the date of completion of construction of 
                the applicable project, a floodplain management 
                plan prepared under subparagraph (A) shall be 
                implemented.
                  (D) Guidelines.--Not later than 180 days 
                after the date of enactment of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 2016, the 
                Secretary, in consultation with the 
                Administrator, shall develop such guidelines 
                for the preparation of floodplain management 
                plans prepared under this paragraph as the 
                Secretary determines to be appropriate.
                  (E) Technical support.--The Secretary may 
                provide technical support for the development 
                and implementation of floodplain management 
                plans prepared under this paragraph.
          (4) Use of funds.--
                  (A) In general.--Assistance provided under 
                this subsection may be used--
                          (i) for any rehabilitation activity 
                        to maximize overall risk reduction 
                        associated with a levee under a 
                        participating State, regional, or 
                        tribal levee safety program; and
                          (ii) only for a levee that is not 
                        federally operated and maintained.
                  (B) Prohibition.--Assistance provided under 
                this subsection shall not be used--
                          (i) to perform routine operation or 
                        maintenance for a levee; or
                          (ii) to make any modification to a 
                        levee that does not result in an 
                        improvement to public safety.
          (5) No proprietary interest.--A contract for 
        assistance provided under this subsection shall not be 
        considered to confer any proprietary interest on the 
        United States.
          (6) Cost share.--The maximum Federal share of the 
        cost of any assistance provided under this subsection 
        shall be 65 percent.
          (7) Project limit.--The maximum amount of Federal 
        assistance for a project under this subsection shall be 
        $10,000,000.
          (8) Limitation.--A project shall not receive Federal 
        assistance under this subsection more than 1 time.
          (9) Federal interest.--For a project that is not a 
        project eligible for rehabilitation assistance under 
        section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 
        701n), the Secretary shall determine that the proposed 
        rehabilitation is in the Federal interest prior to 
        providing assistance for such rehabilitation.
          (10) Other laws.--Assistance provided under this 
        subsection shall be subject to all applicable laws 
        (including regulations) that apply to the construction 
        of a civil works project of the Corps of Engineers.
  (i) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section--
          (1) affects the requirement under section 
        100226(b)(2) of Public Law 112-141 (42 U.S.C. 4101 
        note; 126 Stat. 942); or
          (2) confers any regulatory authority on--
                  (A) the Secretary; or
                  (B) the Administrator, including for the 
                purpose of setting premium rates under the 
                national flood insurance program established 
                under chapter 1 of the National Flood Insurance 
                Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4011 et seq.).

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 9008. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

   There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary--
          (1) to carry out sections 9003, 9005(c), 9005(d), 
        9005(e), and 9005(f), $4,000,000 for each of fiscal 
        years [2015 through 2019] 2019 through 2023;
          (2) to carry out section 9004, $20,000,000 for each 
        of fiscal years [2015 through 2019] 2019 through 2023; 
        and
          (3) to carry out section 9005(h), $30,000,000 for 
        each of fiscal years [2015 through 2019] 2019 through 
        2023.
                              ----------                              

                    NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM ACT

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
SEC. 14. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

  (a) National Dam Safety Program.--
          (1) Annual amounts.--There are authorized to be 
        appropriated to FEMA to carry out sections 7, 8, and 12 
        (in addition to any amounts made available for similar 
        purposes included in any other Act and amounts made 
        available under subsections (b) through (e)), 
        $9,200,000 for each of fiscal years [2015 through 2019] 
        2019 through 2023, to remain available until expended.
          (2) Allocation.--
                  (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraphs (B) 
                and (C), for each fiscal year, amounts made 
                available under this subsection to carry out 
                section 8 shall be allocated among the States 
                as follows:
                          (i) One-third among States that 
                        qualify for assistance under section 
                        8(e).
                          (ii) Two-thirds among States that 
                        qualify for assistance under section 
                        8(e), to each such State in proportion 
                        to--
                                  (I) the number of dams in the 
                                State that are listed as State-
                                regulated dams on the inventory 
                                of dams maintained under 
                                section 6; as compared to
                                  (II) the number of dams in 
                                all States that are listed as 
                                State-regulated dams on the 
                                inventory of dams maintained 
                                under section 6.
                  (B) Maximum amount of allocation.--
                          (i) In general.--The amount of funds 
                        allocated to a State under this 
                        paragraph may not exceed 50 percent of 
                        the reasonable cost of implementing the 
                        State dam safety program.
                          (ii) Fiscal year 2015 and subsequent 
                        fiscal years.--For fiscal year 2015 and 
                        each subsequent fiscal year, the amount 
                        of funds allocated to a State under 
                        this paragraph may not exceed the 
                        amount of funds committed by the State 
                        to implement dam safety activities.
                  (C) Determination.--The Administrator and the 
                Board shall determine the amount allocated to 
                States.
  (b) National Dam Inventory.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out section 6 $500,000 for each of fiscal 
years [2015 through 2019] 2019 through 2023.
  (c) Public Awareness.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
to carry out section 11 $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
[2015 through 2019] 2019 through 2023.
  (d) Research.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
carry out section 9 $1,450,000 for each of fiscal years [2015 
through 2019] 2019 through 2023, to remain until expended.
  (e) Dam Safety Training.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out section 10 $750,000 for each of 
fiscal years [2015 through 2019] 2019 through 2023.
  (f) Staff.--There is authorized to be appropriated to FEMA 
for the employment of such additional staff personnel as are 
necessary to carry out sections 8 through 10 $1,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years [2015 through 2019] 2019 through 2023.
  (g) Limitation on Use of Amounts.--Amounts made available 
under this Act may not be used to construct or repair any 
Federal or non-Federal dam.
                              ----------                              

                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2016

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

Subtitle A--General Provisions

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 1177. REHABILITATION OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTED DAMS.

  (a) In general.--If the Secretary determines that the project 
is feasible, the Secretary may carry out a project for the 
rehabilitation of a dam described in subsection (b).
  (b) Eligible dams.--A dam eligible for assistance under this 
section is a dam--
          (1) that has been constructed, in whole or in part, 
        by the Corps of Engineers for flood control purposes;
          (2) for which construction was completed before 1940;
          (3) that is classified as ``high hazard potential'' 
        by the State dam safety agency of the State in which 
        the dam is located; and
          (4) that is operated by a non-Federal entity.
  (c) Cost sharing.--Non-Federal interests shall provide 35 
percent of the cost of construction of any project carried out 
under this section, including provision of all land, easements, 
rights-of-way, and necessary relocations.
  (d) Agreements.--Construction of a project under this section 
shall be initiated only after a non-Federal interest has 
entered into a binding agreement with the Secretary--
          (1) to pay the non-Federal share of the costs of 
        construction under subsection (c); and
          (2) to pay 100 percent of any operation, maintenance, 
        and replacement and rehabilitation costs with respect 
        to the project in accordance with regulations 
        prescribed by the Secretary.
  (e) Cost Limitation.--The Secretary shall not expend more 
than [$10,000,000] $40,000,000 for a project at any single dam 
under this section.
  (f) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this section [$10,000,000] $40,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2017 through 2026.

SEC. 1178. COLUMBIA RIVER.

  (a) Ecosystem restoration.--Section 536(g) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-541; 114 
Stat. 2662; 128 Stat. 1314) is amended by striking 
``$50,000,000'' and inserting ``$75,000,000''.
  (b) Watercraft Inspection Stations.--Section 104 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610) is amended--
          (1) in subsection (d)--
                  (A) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting 
                the following:
          ``(1) In general.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary may establish, operate, and maintain new or 
        existing watercraft inspection stations to protect the 
        Columbia River Basin to be located in the States of 
        Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington at locations, as 
        determined by the Secretary in consultation with such 
        States, with the highest likelihood of preventing the 
        spread of aquatic invasive species at reservoirs 
        operated and maintained by the Secretary. The Secretary 
        shall also assist the States referred to in this 
        paragraph with rapid response to any aquatic invasive 
        species, including quagga or zebra mussel, 
        infestation.''; and
                  (B) in paragraph (3)(A) by inserting 
                ``Governors of the'' before ``States''; and
          (2) in subsection (e) by striking paragraph (3) and 
        inserting the following:
          ``(3) assist States in early detection of aquatic 
        invasive species, including quagga and zebra mussels; 
        and''.
  (c) Tribal Assistance.--
          (1) Assistance authorized.--
                  (A) In general.--Upon the request of the 
                Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary [may 
                provide assistance] may provide assistance, 
                which may include housing and related 
                improvements, on land transferred by the 
                Department of the Army to the Department of the 
                Interior pursuant to title IV of Public Law 
                100-581 (102 Stat. 2944; 110 Stat. 766; 110 
                Stat. 3762; 114 Stat. 2679; 118 Stat. 544) to 
                Indian tribes displaced as a result of the 
                construction of the Bonneville Dam, Oregon.
                  (B) Clarification.--
                          (i) In general.--The Secretary is 
                        authorized to provide the assistance 
                        described in subparagraph (A) based on 
                        information known or studies undertaken 
                        by the Secretary prior to the date of 
                        enactment of this subsection.
                          (ii) Additional studies.--To the 
                        extent that the Secretary determines 
                        necessary, the Secretary is authorized 
                        to undertake additional studies to 
                        further examine any impacts to Indian 
                        tribes identified in subparagraph (A) 
                        beyond any information or studies 
                        identified under clause (i), except 
                        that the Secretary is authorized to 
                        provide the assistance described in 
                        subparagraph (A) based solely on 
                        information known or studies undertaken 
                        by the Secretary prior to the date of 
                        enactment of this subsection.
          [(2) Study of impacts of john day dam, oregon.--The 
        Secretary shall--
                  [(A) conduct a study to determine the number 
                of Indian tribes displaced by the construction 
                of the John Day Dam, Oregon; and
                  [(B) recommend to the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
                of Representatives and the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
                plan to provide assistance to Indian tribes 
                displaced as a result of the construction of 
                the John Day Dam, Oregon.]

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                              ----------                              

                SECTION 5 OF THE ACT OF AUGUST 18, 1941

  Sec. 5. (a)(1) That there is authorized an emergency fund to 
be expended in preparation for emergency response to any 
natural disaster, in flood fighting and rescue operations, or 
in the repair or restoration of any flood control work 
threatened or destroyed by flood, including the [strengthening, 
raising, extending, or other modification thereof] 
strengthening, raising, extending, realigning, or other 
modification thereof as may be necessary in the discretion of 
the Chief of Engineers for the adequate functioning of the work 
for flood control and subject to the condition that the Chief 
of Engineers may include modifications to the structure or 
project, or in implementation of nonstructural alternatives to 
the repair or restoration of such flood control work if 
requested by the non-Federal sponsor; in the emergency 
protection of federally authorized hurricane or shore 
protection being threatened when in the discretion of the Chief 
of Engineers such protection is warranted to protect against 
imminent and substantial loss to life and property; in the 
repair and restoration of any federally authorized hurricane or 
shore protective [structure or project damaged or destroyed by 
wind, wave, or water action of other than an ordinary nature to 
the design level of protection when, in the discretion of the 
Chief of Engineers,] structure or project damaged or destroyed 
by wind, wave, or water action of other than an ordinary nature 
to either the pre-storm level or the design level of 
protection, whichever provides greater protection, when, in the 
discretion of the Chief of Engineers, such repair and 
restoration is warranted for the adequate functioning of the 
structure or project for hurricane or shore protection, subject 
to the condition that the Chief of Engineers may include 
modifications to the structure or project to address major 
deficiencies or implement nonstructural alternatives to the 
repair or restoration of the structure if requested by the non-
Federal sponsor. The emergency fund may also be expended for 
emergency dredging for restoration of authorized project depths 
for Federal navigable channels and waterways made necessary by 
flood, drought, earthquake, or other natural disasters. In any 
case in which the Chief of Engineers is otherwise performing 
work under this section in an area for which the Governor of 
the affected State has requested a determination that an 
emergency exists or a declaration that a major disaster exists 
under the Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, the 
Chief of Engineers is further authorized to perform on public 
and private lands and waters for a period of ten days following 
the Governor's request any emergency work made necessary by 
such emergency or disaster which is essential for the 
preservation of life and property, including, but not limited 
to, channel clearance, emergency shore protection, clearance 
and removal of debris and wreckage endangering public health 
and safety, and temporary restoration of essential public 
facilities and services. The Chief of Engineers, in the 
exercise of his discretion, is further authorized to provide 
emergency supplies of clean water, on such terms as he 
determines to be advisable, to any locality which he finds is 
confronted with a source of contaminated water causing or 
likely to cause a substantial threat to the public health and 
welfare of the inhabitants of the locality. The appropriation 
of such moneys for the initial establishment of this fund and 
for its replenishment on an annual basis, is authorized: 
Provided, That pending the appropriation of sums to such 
emergency fund, the Secretary of the Army may allot, from 
existing flood-control appropriations, such sums as may be 
necessary for the immediate prosecution of the work herein 
authorized, such appropriations to be reimbursed from the 
appropriation herein authorized when made. The Chief of 
Engineers is authorized, in the prosecution of work in 
connection with rescue operations, or in conducting other flood 
emergency work, to acquire on a rental basis such motor 
vehicles, including passenger cars and buses, as in his 
discretion are deemed necessary.
  (2) In preparing a cost and benefit feasibility assessment 
for any emergency project described in paragraph (1), the Chief 
of Engineers shall consider the benefits to be gained by such 
project for the protection of--
          (A) residential establishments;
          (B) commercial establishments, including the 
        protection of inventory; and
          (C) agricultural establishments, including the 
        protection of crops.
          (3) Nonstructural alternatives defined.--In this 
        subsection, the term ``nonstructural alternatives'' 
        includes efforts to restore or protect natural 
        resources, including streams, rivers, floodplains, 
        wetlands, or coasts, if those efforts will reduce flood 
        risk.
  (b)(1) The Secretary, upon a written request for assistance 
under this paragraph made by any farmer, rancher, or political 
subdivision within a distressed area, and after a determination 
by the Secretary that (A) as a result of the drought such 
farmer, rancher, or political subdivision has an inadequate 
supply of water, (B) an adequate supply of water can be made 
available to such farmer, rancher, or political subdivision 
through the construction of a well, and (C) as a result of the 
drought such well could not be constructed by a private 
business, the Secretary, subject to paragraph (3) of this 
subsection, may enter into an agreement with such farmer, 
rancher, or political subdivision for the construction of such 
well.
  (2) The Secretary, upon a written request for assistance 
under this paragraph made by any farmer, rancher, or political 
subdivision within a distressed area, and after a determination 
by the Secretary that as a result of the drought such farmer, 
rancher, or political subdivision has an inadequate supply of 
water and water cannot be obtained by such farmer, rancher, or 
political subdivision, the Secretary may transport water to 
such farmer, rancher, or political subdivision by methods which 
include, but are not limited to, small-diameter emergency water 
lines and tank trucks, until such time as the Secretary 
determines that an adequate supply of water is available to 
such farmer, rancher, or political subdivision.
  (3)(A) Any agreement entered into by the Secretary pursuant 
to paragraph (1) of this subsection shall require the farmer, 
rancher, or political subdivision for whom the well is 
constructed to pay to the United States the reasonable cost of 
such construction, with interest, over such number of years, 
not to exceed thirty, as the Secretary deems appropriate. The 
rate of interest shall be that rate which the Secretary 
determines would apply if the amount to be repaid was a loan 
made pursuant to section 7(b)(2) of the Small Business Act.
  (B) The Secretary shall not construct any well pursuant to 
this subsection unless the farmer, rancher, or political 
subdivision for whom the well is being constructed has 
obtained, prior to construction, all necessary State and local 
permits.
  (4) The Federal share for the transportation of water 
pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection shall be 100 per 
centum.
  (5) For purposes of this subsection--
          (A) the term ``construction'' includes construction, 
        reconstruction, or repair;
          (B) the term ``distressed area'' means an area which 
        the Secretary determines due to drought conditions has 
        an inadequate water supply which is causing, or is 
        likely to cause, a substantial threat to the health and 
        welfare of the inhabitants of the area including threat 
        of damage or loss of property;
          (C) the term ``political subdivision'' means a city, 
        town, borough, county, parish, district, association, 
        or other public body created by or pursuant to State 
        law and having jurisdiction over the water supply of 
        such public body;
          (D) the term ``reasonable cost'' means the lesser of 
        (i) the cost to the Secretary of constructing a well 
        pursuant to this subsection exclusive of the cost of 
        transporting equipment used in the construction of 
        wells, or (ii) the cost to a private business of 
        constructing such well;
          (E) the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
        Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers; and
          (F) the term ``State'' means a State, the District of 
        Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin 
        Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Trust Territory 
        of the Pacific Islands.
  (c) Levee Owners Manual.--
          (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date 
        of the enactment of this subsection, in accordance with 
        chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, the Secretary 
        of the Army shall prepare a manual describing the 
        maintenance and upkeep responsibilities that the Corps 
        of Engineers requires of a non-Federal interest in 
        order for the non-Federal interest to receive Federal 
        assistance under this section. The Secretary shall 
        provide a copy of the manual at no cost to each non-
        Federal interest that is eligible to receive Federal 
        assistance under this section.
          (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out 
        this subsection.
          (3) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
        definitions apply:
                  (A) Maintenance and upkeep.--The term 
                ``maintenance and upkeep'' means all 
                maintenance and general upkeep of a levee 
                performed on a regular and consistent basis 
                that is not repair and rehabilitation.
                  (B) Repair and rehabilitation.--The term 
                ``repair and rehabilitation''--
                          (i) means the repair or rebuilding of 
                        a levee or other flood control 
                        structure, after the structure has been 
                        damaged by a flood, to the level of 
                        protection provided by the structure 
                        before the flood; but
                          (ii) does not include--
                                  (I) any improvement to the 
                                structure; or
                                  (II) repair or rebuilding 
                                described in clause (i) if, in 
                                the normal course of usage, the 
                                structure becomes structurally 
                                unsound and is no longer fit to 
                                provide the level of protection 
                                for which the structure was 
                                designed.
  (d) Increased Level of Protection.--In conducting repair or 
restoration work under subsection (a), at the request of the 
non-Federal sponsor, the Chief of Engineers may increase the 
level of protection above the level to which the system was 
designed, or, if the repair or restoration includes repair or 
restoration of a pumping station, increase the capacity of a 
pump, if--
          (1) the Chief of Engineers determines the 
        improvements are in the public interest, including 
        consideration of whether--
                  (A) the authority under this section has been 
                used more than once at the same location;
                  (B) there is an opportunity to decrease 
                significantly the risk of loss of life and 
                property damage; or
                  (C) there is an opportunity to decrease total 
                life cycle rehabilitation costs for the 
                project; and
          (2) the non-Federal sponsor agrees to pay the 
        difference between the cost of repair or restoration to 
        the original design level or original capacity and the 
        cost of achieving the higher level of protection or 
        capacity sought by the non-Federal sponsor.
  (e) Notice.--The Secretary shall notify and consult with the 
non-Federal sponsor regarding the opportunity to request 
implementation of nonstructural alternatives to the repair or 
restoration of a flood control work under subsection (a).
                              ----------                              

                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1976

  Sec. 156.
  (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Army, acting through 
the Chief of Engineers, is authorized to provide periodic beach 
nourishment in the case of each water resources development 
project where such nourishment has been authorized for a 
limited period for such additional period as he determines 
necessary but in no event shall such additional period extend 
beyond the fiftieth year which begins after the date of 
initiation of construction of such project.
  (b) Review.--[Notwithstanding]
          (1) In general._Notwithstanding  subsection (a), the 
        Secretary shall, at the request of the non-Federal 
        interest, carry out a study to determine the 
        feasibility of extending the period of nourishment 
        described in subsection (a) for a period not to exceed 
        15 additional years beyond the maximum period described 
        in subsection (a).
          (2) Timing.--The 15 additional years under paragraph 
        (1) shall begin on the date of initiation of 
        construction of congressionally authorized nourishment.
  (c) Plan for Reducing Risk to People and Property.--
          (1) In general.--As part of the review described in 
        subsection (b), the non-Federal interest shall submit 
        to the Secretary a plan for reducing risk to people and 
        property during the life of the project.
          (2) Inclusion of plan in recommendation to 
        congress.--The Secretary shall include the plan 
        described in subsection (a) in the recommendations to 
        Congress described in subsection (d).
  (d) Report to Congress.--Upon completion of the review 
described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall--
          (1) submit to the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation 
        and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives any 
        recommendations of the Secretary related to the review; 
        and
          (2) include in the subsequent annual report to 
        Congress required under section 7001 of the Water 
        Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, any 
        recommendations that require specific congressional 
        authorization.
  (e) Special Rule.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
this section, for any existing authorized water resources 
development project for which the maximum period for 
nourishment described in subsection (a) will expire within the 
5 year-period beginning on the date of enactment of the Water 
Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, that project 
shall remain eligible for nourishment for an additional [6 
years] 9 years after the expiration of such period.
                              ----------                              

              SECTION 221 OF THE FLOOD CONTROL ACT OF 1970

SEC. 221. WRITTEN AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS.

  (a) Cooperation of Non-Federal Interest.--
          (1) In general.--After December 31, 1970, the 
        construction of any water resources project, or an 
        acceptable separable element thereof, by the Secretary 
        of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, or 
        by a non-Federal interest where such interest will be 
        reimbursed for such construction under any provision of 
        law, shall not be commenced until each non-Federal 
        interest has entered into a written partnership 
        agreement with the Secretary (or, where appropriate, 
        the district engineer for the district in which the 
        project will be carried out) under which each party 
        agrees to carry out its responsibilities and 
        requirements for implementation or construction of the 
        project or the appropriate element of the project, as 
        the case may be; except that no such agreement shall be 
        required if the Secretary determines that the 
        administrative costs associated with negotiating, 
        executing, or administering the agreement would exceed 
        the amount of the contribution required from the non-
        Federal interest and are less than $25,000.
          (2) Liquidated damages.--A partnership agreement 
        described in paragraph (1) may include a provision for 
        liquidated damages in the event of a failure of one or 
        more parties to perform.
          (3) Obligation of future appropriations.--In any 
        partnership agreement described in paragraph (1) and 
        entered into by a State, or a body politic of the State 
        which derives its powers from the State constitution, 
        or a governmental entity created by the State 
        legislature, the agreement may reflect that it does not 
        obligate future appropriations for such performance and 
        payment when obligating future appropriations would be 
        inconsistent with constitutional or statutory 
        limitations of the State or a political subdivision of 
        the State.
          (4) Credit for in-kind contributions.--
                  (A) In general.--A partnership agreement 
                described in paragraph (1) may provide with 
                respect to a project that the Secretary shall 
                credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
                of the project, including a project implemented 
                without specific authorization in law or a 
                project under an environmental infrastructure 
                assistance program, the value of in-kind 
                contributions made by the non-Federal interest, 
                including--
                          (i) the costs of planning (including 
                        data collection), design, management, 
                        mitigation, construction, and 
                        construction services that are provided 
                        by the non-Federal interest for 
                        implementation of the project;
                          (ii) the value of materials or 
                        services provided before execution of 
                        the partnership agreement, including 
                        efforts on constructed elements 
                        incorporated into the project; and
                          (iii) the value of materials and 
                        services provided after execution of 
                        the partnership agreement.
                  (B) Condition.--The Secretary may credit an 
                in-kind contribution under subparagraph (A) 
                only if the Secretary determines that the 
                material or service provided as an in-kind 
                contribution is integral to the project.
                  (C) Work performed before partnership 
                agreement.--
                          (i) Construction.--
                                  (I) In general.--In any case 
                                in which the non-Federal 
                                interest is to receive credit 
                                under subparagraph (A) for the 
                                cost of construction carried 
                                out by the non-Federal interest 
                                before execution of a 
                                partnership agreement and that 
                                construction has not been 
                                carried out as of November 8, 
                                2007, the Secretary and the 
                                non-Federal interest shall 
                                enter into an agreement under 
                                which the non-Federal interest 
                                shall carry out such work and 
                                shall do so prior to the non-
                                Federal interest initiating 
                                construction or issuing a 
                                written notice to proceed for 
                                the construction.
                                  (II) Eligibility.--
                                Construction that is carried 
                                out after the execution of an 
                                agreement to carry out work 
                                described in subclause (I) and 
                                any design activities that are 
                                required for that construction, 
                                even if the design activity is 
                                carried out prior to the 
                                execution of the agreement to 
                                carry out work, shall be 
                                eligible for credit.
                          (ii) Planning.--
                                  (I) In general.--In any case 
                                in which the non-Federal 
                                interest is to receive credit 
                                under subparagraph (A) for the 
                                cost of planning carried out by 
                                the non-Federal interest before 
                                execution of a feasibility 
                                cost-sharing agreement, the 
                                Secretary and the non-Federal 
                                interest shall enter into an 
                                agreement under which the non-
                                Federal interest shall carry 
                                out such work and shall do so 
                                prior to the non-Federal 
                                interest initiating that 
                                planning.
                                  (II) Eligibility.--Planning 
                                that is carried out by the non-
                                Federal interest after the 
                                execution of an agreement to 
                                carry out work described in 
                                subclause (I) shall be eligible 
                                for credit.
                  (D) Limitations.--Credit authorized under 
                this paragraph for a project--
                          (i) shall not exceed the non-Federal 
                        share of the cost of the project;
                          (ii) shall not alter any requirement 
                        that a non-Federal interest pay a 
                        portion of the costs of construction of 
                        the project under sections 101(a)(2) 
                        and 103(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources 
                        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                        2211(a)(2); 33 U.S.C. 2213(a)(1)(A)) of 
                        the Water Resources Development Act of 
                        1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211; 33 U.S.C. 2213); 
                        and
                          (iii) shall not alter any requirement 
                        that a non-Federal interest pay a 
                        portion of the costs of construction of 
                        the project under sections 101 and 103 
                        of the Water Resources Development Act 
                        of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211; 33 U.S.C. 
                        2213); and
                          (iv) shall not exceed the actual and 
                        reasonable costs of the materials, 
                        services, or other things provided by 
                        the non-Federal interest, as determined 
                        by the Secretary.
                  (E) Analysis of costs and benefits.--In the 
                evaluation of the costs and benefits of a 
                project, the Secretary shall not consider 
                construction carried out by a non-Federal 
                interest under this subsection as part of the 
                future without project condition.
                  (F) Transfer of credit between separable 
                elements of a project.--Credit for in-kind 
                contributions provided by a non-Federal 
                interest that are in excess of the non-Federal 
                cost share for an authorized separable element 
                of a project may be applied toward the non-
                Federal cost share for a different authorized 
                separable element of the same project.
                  (G) Application of credit.--
                          (i) In general.--To the extent that 
                        credit for in-kind contributions, as 
                        limited by subparagraph (D), and credit 
                        for required land, easements, rights-
                        of-way, dredged material disposal 
                        areas, and relocations provided by the 
                        non-Federal interest exceed the non-
                        Federal share of the cost of 
                        construction of a project other than a 
                        navigation project, the Secretary, 
                        subject to the availability of funds, 
                        shall enter into a reimbursement 
                        agreement with the non-Federal 
                        interest, which shall be in addition to 
                        a partnership agreement under 
                        subparagraph (A), to reimburse the 
                        difference to the non-Federal interest.
                          (ii) Priority.--If appropriated funds 
                        are insufficient to cover the full cost 
                        of all requested reimbursement 
                        agreements under clause (i), the 
                        Secretary shall enter into 
                        reimbursement agreements in the order 
                        in which requests for such agreements 
                        are received.
                  (H) Applicability.--
                          (i) In general.--This paragraph shall 
                        apply to water resources projects 
                        authorized after November 16, 1986, 
                        including projects initiated after 
                        November 16, 1986, without specific 
                        authorization in law, and to water 
                        resources projects authorized prior to 
                        the date of enactment of the Water 
                        Resources Development Act of 1986 
                        (Public Law 99-662), if correction of 
                        design deficiencies is necessary.
                                          (ii) Authorization as 
                                        addition to other 
                                        authorizations.--The 
                                        authority of the 
                                        Secretary to provide 
                                        credit for in-kind 
                                        contributions pursuant 
                                        to this paragraph shall 
                                        be in addition to any 
                                        other authorization to 
                                        provide credit for in-
                                        kind contributions and 
                                        shall not be construed 
                                        as a limitation on such 
                                        other authorization. 
                                        The Secretary shall 
                                        apply the provisions of 
                                        this paragraph, in lieu 
                                        of provisions under 
                                        other crediting 
                                        authority, only if so 
                                        requested by the non-
                                        Federal interest.
  (b) Definition of Non-Federal Interest.--The term ``non-
Federal interest'' means--
          (1) a legally constituted public body (including [a 
        federally recognized Indian tribe and, as defined in 
        section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
        (43 U.S.C. 1602), a Native village, Regional 
        Corporation, and Village Corporation] an Indian tribe, 
        as defined in section 4(e) of the Indian Self-
        Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 
        5304(e))); or
          (2) a nonprofit entity with the consent of the 
        affected local government,
that has full authority and capability to perform the terms of 
its agreement and to pay damages, if necessary, in the event of 
failure to perform.
  (c) Every agreement entered into pursuant to this section 
shall been forcible in the appropriate district court of the 
United States.
  (d) After commencement of construction of a project, the 
Chief of Engineers may undertake performance of those items of 
cooperation necessary to the functioning of the project for its 
purposes, if he has first notified the non-Federal interest of 
its failure to perform the terms of its agreement and has given 
such interest a reasonable time after such notification to so 
perform.
  (e) Delegation of Authority.--Not later than June 30, 2008, 
the Secretary shall issue policies and guidelines for 
partnership agreements that delegate to the district engineers, 
at a minimum--
          (1) the authority to approve any policy in a 
        partnership agreement that has appeared in an agreement 
        previously approved by the Secretary;
          (2) the authority to approve any policy in a 
        partnership agreement the specific terms of which are 
        dictated by law or by a final feasibility study, final 
        environmental impact statement, or other final decision 
        document for a water resources project;
          (3) the authority to approve any partnership 
        agreement that complies with the policies and 
        guidelines issued by the Secretary; and
          (4) the authority to sign any partnership agreement 
        for any water resources project unless, within 30 days 
        of the date of authorization of the project, the 
        Secretary notifies the district engineer in which the 
        project will be carried out that the Secretary wishes 
        to retain the prerogative to sign the partnership 
        agreement for that project.
  (f) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
date of enactment of this subsection, and every year 
thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report 
detailing the following:
          (1) The number of partnership agreements signed by 
        district engineers and the number of partnership 
        agreements signed by the Secretary.
          (2) For any partnership agreement signed by the 
        Secretary, an explanation of why delegation to the 
        district engineer was not appropriate.
  (g) Public Availability.--Not later than 120 days after the 
date of enactment of this subsection, the Chief of Engineers 
shall--
          (1) ensure that each district engineer has made 
        available to the public, including on the Internet, all 
        partnership agreements entered into under this section 
        within the preceding 10 years and all partnership 
        agreements for water resources projects currently being 
        carried out in that district; and
          (2) make each partnership agreement entered into 
        after such date of enactment available to the public, 
        including on the Internet, not later than 7 days after 
        the date on which such agreement is entered into.
  (h) This section shall not apply to any project the 
construction of which was commenced before January 1,1972.
                              ----------                              

                          ACT OF MARCH 3, 1899

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
  Sec. 14.
  (a) Prohibitions and Permissions.--It shall not be lawful for 
any person or persons to take possession of or makes use of for 
any purpose, or build upon, alter, deface, destroy, move, 
injure, obstruct by fastening vessels thereto or otherwise, or 
in any manner whatever impair the usefulness of any sea wall, 
bulkhead, jetty, dike, levee, wharf, pier, or other work built 
by the United States, or any piece of plant, floating or 
otherwise, used in the construction of such work under the 
control of the United States, in whole or in part, for the 
preservation and improvement of any of its navigable waters or 
to prevent floods, or as boundary marks, tide gauges, surveying 
stations, buoys, or other established marks, nor remove for 
ballast or other purposes any stone or other material composing 
such works: Provided, That the Secretary of War may, on the 
recommendation of the Chief of Engineers, grant permission for 
the temporary occupation or use of any of the aforementioned 
public works when in his judgment such occupation or use will 
not be injurious to the public interest: Provided further, That 
the Secretary may, on the recommendation of the Chief of 
Engineers, grant permission for the alteration or permanent 
occupation or use of any of the aforementioned public works 
when in the judgment of the Secretary such occupation or use 
will not be injurious to the public interest and will not 
impair the usefulness of such work.
  (b) Concurrent Review.--
          (1) NEPA review.--
                  (A) In general.--In any case in which an 
                activity subject to this section requires a 
                review under the National Environmental Policy 
                Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), review 
                and approval of the activity under this section 
                shall, to the maximum extent practicable, occur 
                concurrently with any review and decisions made 
                under that Act.
                  (B) Corps of engineers as a cooperating 
                agency.--If the Corps of Engineers is not the 
                lead Federal agency for an environmental review 
                described in subparagraph (A), the Corps of 
                Engineers shall, to the maximum extent 
                practicable and consistent with Federal laws--
                          (i) participate in the review as a 
                        cooperating agency (unless the Corps of 
                        Engineers does not intend to submit 
                        comments on the project); and
                          (ii) adopt and use any environmental 
                        document prepared under the National 
                        Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
                        U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) by the lead agency 
                        to the same extent that a Federal 
                        agency could adopt or use a document 
                        prepared by another Federal agency 
                        under--
                                  (I) the National 
                                Environmental Policy Act of 
                                1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); 
                                and
                                  (II) parts 1500 through 1508 
                                of title 40, Code of Federal 
                                Regulations (or successor 
                                regulations).
          (2) Reviews by secretary.--In any case in which the 
        Secretary must approve an action under this section and 
        under another authority, including sections 9 and 10 of 
        this Act, section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution 
        Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and section 103 of the 
        Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 
        1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413), the Secretary shall--
                  (A) coordinate applicable reviews and, to the 
                maximum extent practicable, carry out the 
                reviews concurrently; and
                  (B) adopt and use any document prepared by 
                the Corps of Engineers for the purpose of 
                complying with the same law and that addresses 
                the same types of impacts in the same 
                geographic area if such document, as determined 
                by the Secretary, is current and applicable.
          (3) Contributed funds.--The Secretary may accept and 
        expend funds received from non-Federal public or 
        private entities to evaluate under this section an 
        alteration or permanent occupation or use of a work 
        built by the United States.
  (c) Timely Review.--
          (1) Complete application.--On or before the date that 
        is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary 
        receives an application for permission to take action 
        affecting public projects pursuant to subsection (a), 
        the Secretary shall inform the applicant whether the 
        application is complete and, if it is not, what items 
        are needed for the application to be complete.
          (2) Decision.--On or before the date that is 90 days 
        after the date on which the Secretary receives a 
        complete application for permission under subsection 
        (a), the Secretary shall--
                  (A) make a decision on the application; or
                  (B) provide a schedule to the applicant 
                identifying when the Secretary will make a 
                decision on the application.
          (3) Notification to congress.--In any case in which a 
        schedule provided under paragraph (2)(B) extends beyond 
        120 days from the date of receipt of a complete 
        application, the Secretary shall provide to the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate 
        and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
        of the House of Representatives an explanation 
        justifying the extended timeframe for review.
  (d) Work Defined.--For the purposes of this section, the term 
``work'' shall not include unimproved real estate owned or 
operated by the Secretary as part of a water resources 
development project if the Secretary determines that 
modification of such real estate would not affect the function 
and usefulness of the project.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                              ----------                              

           WATER RESOURCES REFORM AND DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2014

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
TITLE I--PROGRAM REFORMS AND STREAMLINING

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 1012. TRANSPARENCY IN ACCOUNTING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.

  (a) In General.--On the request of a non-Federal interest, 
the Secretary shall provide to the non-Federal interest a 
detailed accounting of the Federal expenses associated with a 
water resources project.
  (b) Study.--
          (1) In general.--[The Secretary] Not later than 1 
        year after the date of enactment of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2018, the Secretary shall contract 
        with the National Academy of Public Administration to 
        carry out a study on the efficiency of the Corps 
        Engineers current staff salaries and administrative 
        expense procedures as compared to using a separate 
        administrative expense account.
          (2) Contents.--The study under paragraph (1) shall 
        include any recommendations of the National Academy of 
        Public Administration for improvements to the budgeting 
        and administrative processes that will increase the 
        efficiency of the Corps of Engineers project delivery.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

[SEC. 1022. CREDIT IN LIEU OF REIMBURSEMENT.

  [(a) Requests for Credits.--With respect to an authorized 
flood damage reduction project, or separable element thereof, 
for whicha written agreement with the Corps of Engineers for 
constructionwas finalized on or before December 31, 2014, under 
section211 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C.701b-13) (as it existed before the repeal made by 
section1014(c)(3)), the Secretary may provide to the non-
Federal interest, at the request of the non-Federal interest, a 
credit in an amount equal to the estimated Federal share of the 
cost of the project or separable element, in lieu of providing 
to the non-Federal interest a reimbursement in that amount.
  [(b) Application of Credits.--At the request of the non-
Federal interest, the Secretary may apply such credit to the 
non-Federal share of the cost of carrying out other water 
resources development projects or studies of the non-Federal 
interest.]

SEC. 1022. CREDIT IN LIEU OF REIMBURSEMENT.

  (a) Requests for Credits.--With respect to an authorized 
flood damage reduction project, or separable element thereof, 
that has been constructed by a non-Federal interest under 
section 211 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 701b-13), or an authorized coastal navigation project 
that has been constructed by the Corps of Engineers pursuant to 
section 11 of the Act of March 3, 1925, before the date of 
enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018, the 
Secretary may provide to the non-Federal interest, at the 
request of the non-Federal interest, a credit in an amount 
equal to the estimated Federal share of the cost of the project 
or separable element, in lieu of providing to the non-Federal 
interest a reimbursement in that amount.
  (b) Application of Credits.--At the request of the non-
Federal interest, the Secretary may apply such credit to the 
share of the cost of the non-Federal interest of carrying out 
other flood damage reduction and coastal navigation projects or 
studies.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 1043. NON-FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PILOT PROGRAM.

  (a) Non-Federal Implementation of Feasibility Studies.--
          (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        establish and implement a pilot program to evaluate the 
        cost-effectiveness and project delivery efficiency of 
        allowing non-Federal interests to carry out feasibility 
        studies for flood risk management, hurricane and storm 
        damage reduction, aquatic ecosystem restoration, and 
        coastal harbor and channel and inland navigation.
          (2) Purposes.--The purposes of the pilot program 
        are--
                  (A) to identify project delivery and cost-
                saving alternatives to the existing feasibility 
                study process;
                  (B) to evaluate the technical, financial, and 
                organizational efficiencies of a non-Federal 
                interest carrying out a feasibility study of 1 
                or more projects; and
                  (C) to evaluate alternatives for the 
                decentralization of the project planning, 
                management, and operational decisionmaking 
                process of the Corps of Engineers.
          (3) Administration.--
                  (A) In general.--On the request of a non-
                Federal interest, the Secretary may enter into 
                an agreement with the non-Federal interest for 
                the non-Federal interest to provide full 
                project management control of a feasibility 
                study for a project for--
                          (i) flood risk management;
                          (ii) hurricane and storm damage 
                        reduction, including levees, 
                        floodwalls, flood control channels, and 
                        water control structures;
                          (iii) coastal harbor and channel and 
                        inland navigation; and
                          (iv) aquatic ecosystem restoration.
                  (B) Use of non-federal funds.--
                          (i) In general.--A non-Federal 
                        interest that has entered into an 
                        agreement with the Secretary pursuant 
                        to subparagraph (A) may use non-Federal 
                        funds to carry out the feasibility 
                        study.
                          (ii) Credit.--The Secretary shall 
                        credit towards the non-Federal share of 
                        the cost of construction of a project 
                        for which a feasibility study is 
                        carried out under this subsection an 
                        amount equal to the portion of the cost 
                        of developing the study that would have 
                        been the responsibility of the 
                        Secretary, if the study were carried 
                        out by the Secretary, subject to the 
                        conditions that--
                                  (I) non-Federal funds were 
                                used to carry out the 
                                activities that would have been 
                                the responsibility of the 
                                Secretary;
                                  (II) the Secretary determines 
                                that the feasibility study 
                                complies with all applicable 
                                Federal laws and regulations; 
                                and
                                  (III) the project is 
                                authorized by any provision of 
                                Federal law enacted after the 
                                date on which an agreement is 
                                entered into under subparagraph 
                                (A).
                  (C) Transfer of funds.--
                          (i) In general.--After the date on 
                        which an agreement is executed pursuant 
                        to subparagraph (A), the Secretary may 
                        transfer to the non-Federal interest to 
                        carry out the feasibility study--
                                  (I) if applicable, the 
                                balance of any unobligated 
                                amounts appropriated for the 
                                study, except that the 
                                Secretary shall retain 
                                sufficient amounts for the 
                                Corps of Engineers to carry out 
                                any responsibilities of the 
                                Corps of Engineers relating to 
                                the project and pilot program; 
                                and
                                  (II) additional amounts, as 
                                determined by the Secretary, 
                                from amounts made available 
                                under paragraph (8), except 
                                that the total amount 
                                transferred to the non-Federal 
                                interest shall not exceed the 
                                updated estimate of the Federal 
                                share of the cost of the 
                                feasibility study.
                          (ii) Administration.--The Secretary 
                        shall include such provisions as the 
                        Secretary determines to be necessary in 
                        an agreement under subparagraph (A) to 
                        ensure that a non-Federal interest 
                        receiving Federal funds under this 
                        paragraph--
                                  (I) has the necessary 
                                qualifications to administer 
                                those funds; and
                                  (II) will comply with all 
                                applicable Federal laws 
                                (including regulations) 
                                relating to the use of those 
                                funds.
                  (D) Notification.--The Secretary shall notify 
                the Committee on Environment and Public Works 
                of the Senate and the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
                of Representatives on the initiation of each 
                feasibility study under the pilot program.
                  (E) Auditing.--The Secretary shall regularly 
                monitor and audit each feasibility study 
                carried out by a non-Federal interest under 
                this section to ensure that the use of any 
                funds transferred under subparagraph (C) are 
                used in compliance with the agreement signed 
                under subparagraph (A).
                  (F) Technical assistance.--On the request of 
                a non-Federal interest, the Secretary may 
                provide technical assistance to the non-Federal 
                interest relating to any aspect of the 
                feasibility study, if the non-Federal interest 
                contracts with the Secretary for the technical 
                assistance and compensates the Secretary for 
                the technical assistance.
                  (G) Detailed project schedule.--Not later 
                than 180 days after entering into an agreement 
                under subparagraph (A), each non-Federal 
                interest, to the maximum extent practicable, 
                shall submit to the Secretary a detailed 
                project schedule, based on full funding 
                capability, that lists all deadlines for 
                milestones relating to the feasibility study.
          (4) Cost share.--Nothing in this subsection affects 
        the cost-sharing requirement applicable on the day 
        before the date of enactment of this Act to a 
        feasibility study carried out under this subsection.
          (5) Report.--
                  (A) In general.--Not later than 2 years after 
                the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
                the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
                and make publicly available a report detailing 
                the results of the pilot program carried out 
                under this section, including--
                          (i) a description of the progress of 
                        the non-Federal interests in meeting 
                        milestones in detailed project 
                        schedules developed pursuant to 
                        paragraph (3)(G); and
                          (ii) any recommendations of the 
                        Secretary concerning whether the 
                        program or any component of the program 
                        should be implemented on a national 
                        basis.
                  (B) Update.--Not later than 5 years after the 
                date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
                shall submit to the Committee on Environment 
                and Public Works of the Senate and the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
                of the House of Representatives an update of 
                the report described in subparagraph (A).
                  (C) Failure to meet deadline.--If the 
                Secretary fails to submit a report by the 
                required deadline under this paragraph, the 
                Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
                the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
                a detailed explanation of why the deadline was 
                missed and a projected date for submission of 
                the report.
          (6) Administration.--All laws and regulations that 
        would apply to the Secretary if the Secretary were 
        carrying out the feasibility study shall apply to a 
        non-Federal interest carrying out a feasibility study 
        under this subsection.
          (7) Termination of authority.--The authority to 
        commence a feasibility study under this subsection 
        terminates on the date that is 5 years after the date 
        of enactment of this Act.
          (8) Authorization of appropriations.--In addition to 
        any amounts appropriated for a specific project, there 
        is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to 
        carry out the pilot program under this subsection, 
        including the costs of administration of the Secretary, 
        $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2019.
  (b) Non-Federal Project Implementation Pilot Program.--
          (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        establish and implement a pilot program to evaluate the 
        cost-effectiveness and project delivery efficiency of 
        allowing non-Federal interests to carry out flood risk 
        management, hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        coastal harbor and channel inland navigation, and 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration projects.
          (2) Purposes.--The purposes of the pilot program 
        are--
                  (A) to identify project delivery and cost-
                saving alternatives that reduce the backlog of 
                authorized Corps of Engineers projects;
                  (B) to evaluate the technical, financial, and 
                organizational efficiencies of a non-Federal 
                interest carrying out the design, execution, 
                management, and construction of 1 or more 
                projects; and
                  (C) to evaluate alternatives for the 
                decentralization of the project management, 
                design, and construction for authorized Corps 
                of Engineers water resources projects.
          (3) Administration.--
                  (A) In general.--In carrying out the pilot 
                program, the Secretary shall--
                          (i) identify a total of not more than 
                        15 projects for flood risk management, 
                        hurricane and storm damage reduction 
                        (including levees, floodwalls, flood 
                        control channels, and water control 
                        structures), coastal harbor and 
                        channels, inland navigation, and 
                        aquatic ecosystem restoration that have 
                        been authorized for construction prior 
                        to the date of enactment of this Act, 
                        including--
                                  (I) not more than 12 projects 
                                that--
                                          (aa)(AA) have 
                                        received Federal funds 
                                        prior to the date of 
                                        enactment of this Act; 
                                        or
                                                  (BB) for more 
                                                than 2 
                                                consecutive 
                                                fiscal years, 
                                                have an 
                                                unobligated 
                                                funding balance 
                                                for that 
                                                project in the 
                                                Corps of 
                                                Engineers 
                                                construction 
                                                account; and
                                          (bb) to the maximum 
                                        extent practicable, are 
                                        located in each of the 
                                        divisions of the Corps 
                                        of Engineers; and
                                  (II) not more than 3 projects 
                                that have not received Federal 
                                funds in the period beginning 
                                on the date on which the 
                                project was authorized and 
                                ending on the date of enactment 
                                of this Act;
                          (ii) notify the Committee on 
                        Environment and Public Works of the 
                        Senate and the Committee on 
                        Transportation and Infrastructure of 
                        the House of Representatives on the 
                        identification of each project under 
                        the pilot program;
                          (iii) in collaboration with the non-
                        Federal interest, develop a detailed 
                        project management plan for each 
                        identified project that outlines the 
                        scope, budget, design, and construction 
                        resource requirements necessary for the 
                        non-Federal interest to execute the 
                        project, or a separable element of the 
                        project;
                          (iv) on the request of the non-
                        Federal interest, enter into a project 
                        partnership agreement with the non-
                        Federal interest for the non-Federal 
                        interest to provide full project 
                        management control for construction of 
                        the project, or a separable element of 
                        the project, in accordance with plans 
                        approved by the Secretary;
                          (v) following execution of the 
                        project partnership agreement, transfer 
                        to the non-Federal interest to carry 
                        out construction of the project, or a 
                        separable element of the project--
                                  (I) if applicable, the 
                                balance of the unobligated 
                                amounts appropriated for the 
                                project, except that the 
                                Secretary shall retain 
                                sufficient amounts for the 
                                Corps of Engineers to carry out 
                                any responsibilities of the 
                                Corps of Engineers relating to 
                                the project and pilot program; 
                                and
                                  (II) additional amounts, as 
                                determined by the Secretary, 
                                from amounts made available 
                                under paragraph (8), except 
                                that the total amount 
                                transferred to the non-Federal 
                                interest shall not exceed the 
                                updated estimate of the Federal 
                                share of the cost of 
                                construction, including any 
                                required design; and
                          (vi) regularly monitor and audit each 
                        project being constructed by a non-
                        Federal interest under this section to 
                        ensure that the construction activities 
                        are carried out in compliance with the 
                        plans approved by the Secretary and 
                        that the construction costs are 
                        reasonable.
                  (B) Detailed project schedule.--Not later 
                than 180 days after entering into an agreement 
                under subparagraph (A)(iv), each non-Federal 
                interest, to the maximum extent practicable, 
                shall submit to the Secretary a detailed 
                project schedule, based on estimated funding 
                levels, that lists all deadlines for each 
                milestone in the construction of the project.
                  (C) Technical assistance.--On the request of 
                a non-Federal interest, the Secretary may 
                provide technical assistance to the non-Federal 
                interest, if the non-Federal interest contracts 
                with and compensates the Secretary for the 
                technical assistance relating to--
                          (i) any study, engineering activity, 
                        and design activity for construction 
                        carried out by the non-Federal interest 
                        under this subsection; and
                          (ii) expeditiously obtaining any 
                        permits necessary for the project.
          (4) Cost share.--Nothing in this subsection affects 
        the cost-sharing requirement applicable on the day 
        before the date of enactment of this Act to a project 
        carried out under this subsection.
          (5) Report.--
                  (A) In general.--Not later than 3 years after 
                the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
                the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
                and make publicly available a report detailing 
                the results of the pilot program carried out 
                under this subsection, including--
                          (i) a description of the progress of 
                        non-Federal interests in meeting 
                        milestones in detailed project 
                        schedules developed pursuant to 
                        paragraph (2)(B); and
                          (ii) any recommendations of the 
                        Secretary concerning whether the 
                        program or any component of the program 
                        should be implemented on a national 
                        basis.
                  (B) Update.--Not later than 5 years after the 
                date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
                shall submit to the Committee on Environment 
                and Public Works of the Senate and the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
                of the House of Representatives an update of 
                the report described in subparagraph (A).
                  (C) Failure to meet deadline.--If the 
                Secretary fails to submit a report by the 
                required deadline under this paragraph, the 
                Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
                the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
                a detailed explanation of why the deadline was 
                missed and a projected date for submission of 
                the report.
          (6) Administration.--All laws and regulations that 
        would apply to the Secretary if the Secretary were 
        carrying out the project shall apply to a non-Federal 
        interest carrying out a project under this subsection.
          (7) Termination of authority.--The authority to 
        commence a project under this subsection terminates on 
        the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment of 
        this Act.
          (8) Authorization of appropriations.--In addition to 
        any amounts appropriated for a specific project, there 
        is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to 
        carry out the pilot program under this subsection, 
        including the costs of administration of the Secretary, 
        $25,000,000 for each of fiscal years [2015 through 
        2019] 2019 through 2023.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                          TITLE II--NAVIGATION

Subtitle A--Inland Waterways

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 2010. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER PROTECTION.

  (a) Definition of Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam.--In 
this section, the term ``Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam'' 
means the lock and dam located on Mississippi River Mile 853.9 
in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  (b) Mandatory Closure.--Not later than 1 year after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall close the Upper 
St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam.
  (c) Emergency Operations.--Nothing in this section prevents 
the Secretary from carrying out emergency lock operations 
necessary to mitigate flood damage.
  (d) Considerations.--In carrying out a disposition study with 
respect to the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam, including 
a disposition study under section 216 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a), the Secretary may not complete such 
study until the Secretary considers, and issues a report to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate on--
          (1) the feasibility of carrying out modifications to 
        the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam to--
                  (A) preserve and enhance recreational 
                opportunities and the health of the ecosystem; 
                and
                  (B) maintain the benefits to the natural 
                ecosystem and human environment; and
          (2) the preservation of any portion of the Upper St. 
        Anthony Falls Lock and Dam necessary to maintain flood 
        control.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

TITLE III--SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDRESSING EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

Subtitle C--Additional Safety Improvements and Risk Reduction Measures

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 3025. POST-DISASTER WATERSHED ASSESSMENTS.

  (a) Watershed Assessments.--
          (1) In general.--In an area that the President has 
        declared a major disaster in accordance with section 
        401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
        Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170), the 
        Secretary may carry out a watershed assessment to 
        identify, to the maximum extent practicable, specific 
        flood risk reduction, hurricane and storm damage 
        reduction, ecosystem restoration, or navigation project 
        recommendations that will help to rehabilitate and 
        improve the resiliency of damaged infrastructure and 
        natural resources to reduce risks to human life and 
        property from future natural disasters.
          (2) Existing projects.--A watershed assessment 
        carried out paragraph (1) may identify existing 
        projects being carried out under 1 or more of the 
        authorities referred to in subsection (b)(1).
          (3) Duplicate watershed assessments.--In carrying out 
        a watershed assessment under paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary shall use all existing watershed assessments 
        and related information developed by the Secretary or 
        other Federal, State, or local entities.
  (b) Projects.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out projects 
        identified under a watershed assessment under 
        subsection (a) in accordance with the criteria for 
        projects carried out under one of the following 
        authorities:
                  (A) Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
                1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
                  (B) Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 
                of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i).
                  (C) Section 206 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
                  (D) Section 1135 of the Water Resources 
                Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a).
                  (E) Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act 
                of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577).
                  (F) Section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 
                (33 U.S.C. 426g).
          (2) Annual plan.--For each project that does not meet 
        the criteria under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 
        include a recommendation relating to the project in the 
        annual report submitted to Congress by the Secretary in 
        accordance with section 7001.
          (3) Existing projects.--In carrying out a project 
        under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
                  (A) to the maximum extent practicable, use 
                all existing information and studies available 
                for the project; and
                  (B) not require any element of a study 
                completed for the project prior to the disaster 
                to be repeated.
  (c) Requirements.--All requirements applicable to a project 
under the Acts described in subsection (b) shall apply to the 
project.
  (d) Limitations on Assessments.--A watershed assessment under 
subsection (a) shall be initiated not later than 2 years after 
the date on which the major disaster declaration is issued.
  (e) Assessments in the Territories of the United States.--
          (1) In general.--For any major disaster declared in 
        the territories of the United States before the date of 
        enactment of this subsection, all activities in the 
        territory carried out or undertaken pursuant to the 
        authorities described under this section shall be 
        conducted at full Federal expense unless the President 
        determines that the territory has the ability to pay 
        the cost share for an assessment under this section 
        without the use of non-Federal funds or loans.
          (2) Territories defined.--In this subsection, the 
        term ``territories of the United States'' means those 
        insular areas specified in section 1156(a)(1) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2310(a)(1)).

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

TITLE VI--DEAUTHORIZATION AND BACKLOG PREVENTION

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 6003. BACKLOG PREVENTION.

  (a) Project Deauthorization.--
          (1) In general.--A water resources development 
        project, or separable element of such a project, 
        authorized for construction by this Act shall not be 
        authorized after the last day of the [7-year] 10-year 
        period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act 
        unless funds have been obligated for construction of 
        such project during that period.
          (2) Identification of projects.--Not later than 60 
        days after the expiration of the [7-year] 10-year 
        period referred to in paragraph (1), the Secretary 
        shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation 
        and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a 
        report that identifies the projects deauthorized under 
        paragraph (1).
  (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 60 days after the 
expiration of the 12-year period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives, and make available to the public, a report 
that contains--
          (1) a list of any water resources development 
        projects authorized by this Act for which construction 
        has not been completed during that period;
          (2) a description of the reasons the projects were 
        not completed;
          (3) a schedule for the completion of the projects 
        based on expected levels of appropriations; and
          (4) a 5-year and 10-year projection of construction 
        backlog and any recommendations to Congress regarding 
        how to mitigate current problems and the backlog.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                              ----------                              

                        ACT OF OCTOBER 15, 1940

  AN ACT To authorize the Secretary of War to accept, as loans, from 
States and political subdivisions thereof, funds to be immediately used 
  in the prosecution of authorized flood-control work, and for other 
                               purposes.

   Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
the United States of America in Congress assembled, That 
whenever any State or political subdivision thereof shall offer 
to advance funds for [a flood-control project duly adopted and 
authorized by law] a federally authorized water resources 
development project, the Secretary of the Army may in his 
discretion, receive such funds and expend the same in the 
immediate prosecution of [such work] such project. The 
Secretary of the Army is authorized and directed to repay 
without interest, [from appropriations which may be provided by 
Congress for flood-control work] if appropriations are provided 
by Congress for such purpose, the moneys so contributed and 
expended: Provided, however, That no repayment of funds which 
may be contributed for the purpose of meeting any conditions of 
local cooperation imposed by Congress, or under the authority 
of section 5 of the Flood Control Act approved, June 22, 1936, 
as amended, shall be made. For purposes of this Act, the term 
``State'' means the several States, the District of Columbia, 
the commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the United 
States, and Indian tribes (as defined in section 4(e) of the 
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 
U.S.C. 5304(e))).
                              ----------                              

                 SECTION 11 OF THE ACT OF MARCH 3, 1925

   AN ACT authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of 
  certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
  [Sec. 11. That whenever local interests shall offer to 
advance funds for the prosecution of a work of river and harbor 
improvement duly adopted and authorized by law the Secretary of 
the War may, in his discretion, receive such funds and expend 
the same in the immediate prosecution of such work. The 
Secretary of the War is hereby authorized and directed to repay 
without interest, from appropriations which may be provided by 
Congress for river and harbor improvements, the moneys so 
contributed and expended: Provided, That no repayment of funds 
which may be contributed for the purpose of meeting any 
conditions of local cooperation imposed by Congress, nor under 
the authority of section 4 of the River and Harbor Act, 
approved March 4, 1915, shall be made.]

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                              ----------                              

                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2000

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 214. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

  (a) Funding to Process Permits.--
          (1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                  (A) Natural gas company.--The term ``natural 
                gas company'' has the meaning given the term in 
                section 1262 of the Public Utility Holding 
                Company Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16451), except 
                that the term also includes a person engaged in 
                the transportation of natural gas in intrastate 
                commerce.
                  (B) Public-utility company.--The term 
                ``public-utility company'' has the meaning 
                given the term in section 1262 of the Public 
                Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
                16451).
                  (C) Railroad carrier.--The term ``railroad 
                carrier'' has the meaning given the term in 
                section 20102 of title 49, United States Code.
          (2) Permit processing.--The Secretary, after public 
        notice, may accept and expend funds contributed by a 
        non-Federal public entity or a public-utility company, 
        natural gas company, or railroad carrier to expedite 
        the evaluation of a permit of that entity, company, or 
        carrier related to a project or activity for a public 
        purpose under the jurisdiction of the Department of the 
        Army.
          (3) Limitation for public-utility and natural gas 
        companies.--The authority provided under paragraph (2) 
        to a public-utility company, natural gas company, or 
        railroad carrier shall expire on the date that is [10 
        years] 12 years after the date of enactment of this 
        paragraph.
          (4) Effect on other entities.--To the maximum extent 
        practicable, the Secretary shall ensure that expediting 
        the evaluation of a permit through the use of funds 
        accepted and expended under this section does not 
        adversely affect the timeline for evaluation (in the 
        Corps district in which the project or activity is 
        located) of permits under the jurisdiction of the 
        Department of the Army of other entities that have not 
        contributed funds under this section.
          (5) GAO study.--Not later than [4 years after the 
        date of enactment of this paragraph] December 31, 2022, 
        the Comptroller General of the United States shall 
        [carry out a study] carry out a followup study of the 
        implementation by the Secretary of the authority 
        provided under paragraph (2) to public-utility 
        companies, natural gas companies, and railroad 
        carriers, including an evaluation of the compliance 
        with the requirements of this section and, with respect 
        to a permit for those entities, the requirements of 
        applicable Federal laws.
  (b) Effect on Permitting.--
          (1) In general.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall ensure that the use of funds accepted 
        under subsection (a) will not impact impartial 
        decisionmaking with respect to permits, either 
        substantively or procedurally.
          (2) Impartial decisionmaking.--In carrying out this 
        section, the Secretary shall ensure that the evaluation 
        of permits carried out using funds accepted under this 
        section shall--
                  (A) be reviewed by--
                          (i) the District Commander, or the 
                        Commander's designee, of the Corps 
                        District in which the project or 
                        activity is located; or
                          (ii) the Commander of the Corps 
                        Division in which the District is 
                        located if the evaluation of the permit 
                        is initially conducted by the District 
                        Commander; and
                  (B) utilize the same procedures for decisions 
                that would otherwise be required for the 
                evaluation of permits for similar projects or 
                activities not carried out using funds 
                authorized under this section.
  (c) Limitation on Use of Funds.--None of the funds accepted 
under this section shall be used to carry out a review of the 
evaluation of permits required under subsection (b)(2)(A).
  (d) Public Availability.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall ensure that all 
        final permit decisions carried out using funds 
        authorized under this section are made available to the 
        public in a common format, including on the Internet, 
        and in a manner that distinguishes final permit 
        decisions under this section from other final actions 
        of the Secretary.
          (2) Decision document.--The Secretary shall--
                  (A) use a standard decision document for 
                evaluating all permits using funds accepted 
                under this section; and
                  (B) make the standard decision document, 
                along with all final permit decisions, 
                available to the public, including on the 
                Internet.
          (3) Agreements.--The Secretary shall make all active 
        agreements to accept funds under this section available 
        on a single public Internet site.
  (e) Reporting.--
          (1) In general.--The Secretary shall prepare an 
        annual report on the implementation of this section, 
        which, at a minimum, shall include for each district of 
        the Corps of Engineers that accepts funds under this 
        section--
                  (A) a comprehensive list of any funds 
                accepted under this section during the previous 
                fiscal year;
                  (B) a comprehensive list of the permits 
                reviewed and approved using funds accepted 
                under this section during the previous fiscal 
                year, including a description of the size and 
                type of resources impacted and the mitigation 
                required for each permit; and
                  (C) a description of the training offered in 
                the previous fiscal year for employees that is 
                funded in whole or in part with funds accepted 
                under this section.
          (2) Submission.--Not later than 90 days after the end 
        of each fiscal year, the Secretary shall--
                  (A) submit to the Committee on Environment 
                and Public Works of the Senate and the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
                of the House of Representatives the annual 
                report described in paragraph (1); and
                  (B) make each report received under 
                subparagraph (A) available on a single publicly 
                accessible Internet site.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                              ----------                              

                       FLOOD CONTROL ACT OF 1946

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
  Sec. 14. That the Secretary of the Army is hereby authorized 
to allot from any appropriations heretofore or hereafter made 
for flood control, not to exceed $20,000,000 per year, for the 
construction, repair, restoration, and modification of 
emergency streambank and shoreline protection works to prevent 
damage to highways, bridge approaches, and public works, 
churches, hospitals, schools, and other nonprofit public 
services, when in the opinion of the Chief of Engineers such 
work is advisable: Provided, That not more than $5,000,000 
shall be allotted for this purpose at any single locality from 
the appropriations for any one fiscal year, and if such amount 
is not sufficient to cover the costs included in the Federal 
cost share for a project, as determined by the Secretary, the 
non-Federal interest shall be responsible for any such costs 
that exceed such amount.
                              ----------                              

                      RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1960

  Sec. 107. (a) That the Secretary of the Army is authorized to 
allot from any appropriations hereafter made for rivers and 
harbors not to exceed [$50,000,000] $62,500,000 for any one 
fiscal year for the construction of small river and harbor 
improvement projects not specifically authorized by Congress 
which will result in substantial benefits to navigation and 
which can be operated consistently with appropriate and 
economic use of the waters of the Nation for other purposes, 
when in the opinion of the Chief of Engineers such work is 
advisable, if benefits are in excess of the cost.
  (b) Not more than [$10,000,000] $12,500,000 shall be allotted 
for the construction of a project under this section at any 
single locality and the amount allotted shall be sufficient to 
complete the Federal participation in the project under this 
section.
  (c) Local interests shall provide without cost to the United 
States all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for all 
projects to be constructed under the authority of this section. 
In addition, local interests may be required to hold and save 
the United States free from damages that may result from the 
construction and maintenance of the project and may be required 
to provide such additional local cooperation as the Chief of 
Engineers deems appropriate. A State, county, municipality or 
other responsible local entity shall give assurance 
satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers that such conditions of 
cooperation as are required will be accomplished.
  (d) Non-Federal interests may be required to share in the 
cost of the project to the extent that the Chief of Engineers 
deems that such cost should not be borne by the Federal 
Government in view of the recreational or otherwise special or 
local nature of the project benefits.
  (e) Each project for which money is allotted under this 
section shall be complete in itself and not commit the United 
States to any additional improvement to insure its successful 
operation, other than routine maintenance, and except as may 
result from the normal procedure applying to projects 
authorized after submission of survey reports, and projects 
constructed under the authority of this section shall be 
considered as authorized projects.
  (f) This section shall apply to, but not be limited to, the 
provision of low water access navigation channels from the 
existing channel of the Mississippi River to harbor areas 
heretofore or now established and located along the Mississippi 
River.
                              ----------                              

                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1990

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

  (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990''.
  (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
     * * * * * * *

               TITLE III--GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS

     * * * * * * *
[Sec. 314. Operation and maintenance of hydroelectric facilities]
Sec. 314. Operation and maintenance of navigation and hydroelectric 
          facilities.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 314. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION AND HYDROELECTRIC 
                    FACILITIES.

  [Activities currently performed] (a) In General._Activities 
currently performed  by personnel under the direction of the 
Secretary in connection with the operation and maintenance of 
navigation or hydroelectric power generating facilities at 
Corps of Engineers water resources projects are to be 
considered as inherently governmental functions and not 
commercial activities. [This section]
  (b) Major Maintenance Contracts Allowed.--This section does 
not prohibit contracting out major maintenance or other 
functions which are currently contracted out or studying 
services not directly connected with project maintenance and 
operations.
  (c) Exclusion.--This section does not--
          (1) apply to a navigation facility that was under 
        contract on or before the date of enactment of this 
        subsection with a non-Federal interest to perform 
        operations or maintenance; and
          (2) prohibit the Secretary from contracting out 
        commercial activities after the date of enactment of 
        this subsection at a navigation facility.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                              ----------                              

                WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1992

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *
TITLE II--GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

SEC. 219. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

  (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to provide 
assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying out water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
and development projects described in subsection (c), including 
waste water treatment and related facilities and water supply, 
storage, treatment, and distribution facilities. Such 
assistance may be in the form of technical and planning and 
design assistance. If the Secretary is to provide any design or 
engineering assistance to carry out a project under this 
section, the Secretary shall obtain by procurement from private 
sources all services necessary for the Secretary to provide 
such assistance, unless the Secretary finds that--
          (1) the service would require the use of a new 
        technology unavailable in the private sector; or
          (2) a solicitation or request for proposal has failed 
        to attract 2 or more bids or proposals.
  (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
projects for which assistance is provided under this section 
shall not be less than 25 percent, except that such share shall 
be subject to the ability of the non-Federal interest to pay, 
including the procedures and regulations relating to ability to 
pay established under section 103(m) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986.
  (c) Project Descriptions.--The projects for which the 
Secretary is authorized to provide assistance under subsection 
(a) are as follows:
          (1) Washington, d.c. and maryland.--Measures to 
        alleviate adverse water quality impacts resulting from 
        storm water discharges from Federal facilities in the 
        Anacostia River watershed, Washington, D.C. and 
        Maryland.
          (2) Atlanta, georgia.--A combined sewer overflow 
        treatment facility for the city of Atlanta, Georgia.
          (3) Hazard, kentucky.--A water system (including a 
        13,000,000 gallon per day water treatment plant), 
        intake structures, raw water pipelines and pumps, 
        distribution lines, and pumps and storage tanks for 
        Hazard, Kentucky.
          (4) Rouge river, michigan.--Completion of a 
        comprehensive streamflow enhancement project for the 
        Western Townships Utility Authority, Rouge River, Wayne 
        County, Michigan.
          (5) Jackson county, mississippi.--Provision of an 
        alternative water supply and projects for the design, 
        installation, enhancement, or repair of sewer systems 
        for Jackson County, Mississippi.
          (6) Epping, new hampshire.--Evaluation and assistance 
        in addressing expanded and advanced wastewater 
        treatment needs for Epping, New Hampshire.
          (7) Manchester, new hampshire.--Elimination of 
        combined sewer overflows in the city of Manchester, New 
        Hampshire.
          (8) Rochester, new hampshire.--Provision of advanced 
        wastewater treatment for the city of Rochester, New 
        Hampshire.
          (9) Paterson and passaic county, new jersey.--
        Drainage facilities to alleviate flooding problems on 
        Getty Avenue in the vicinity of St. Joseph's Hospital 
        for the city of Paterson, New Jersey, and Passaic 
        County, New Jersey.
          (10) State of new jersey and new jersey wastewater 
        treatment trust.--The development of innovative 
        beneficial uses of sewage sludge and conventional and 
        innovative facilities to dispose of sewage sludge or to 
        make reusable products from sewage sludge for local 
        government units that ceased the discharge of sewage 
        sludge in the Atlantic Ocean.
          (11) Erie county, new york.--A tunnel from North 
        Buffalo, New York, to Amherst Quarry to relieve 
        flooding and improve water quality.
          (12) Erie county, new york.--A sludge processing 
        disposal facility to serve the Erie County Sewer 
        District 5, New York.
          (13) Otsego county, new york.--A water storage tank 
        and an adequate water filtration system for the Village 
        of Milford, Otsego County, New York.
          (14) Chenango county, new york.--A primary source 
        water well and improvement of a water distribution 
        system for New Berlin, Chenango County, New York.
          (15) Greensboro and glassworks, pennsylvania.--A 
        sewage treatment plant for the borough of Greensboro, 
        Pennsylvania, and the unincorporated village of 
        Glassworks, Pennsylvania.
          (16) Lynchburg, virginia.--Alleviation of combined 
        sewer overflows for Lynchburg, Virginia, in accordance 
        with combined sewer overflow control plans adopted by, 
        and currently being implemented by, the non-Federal 
        sponsor.
          (17) Richmond, virginia.--Alleviation of combined 
        sewer overflows for Richmond, Virginia, in accordance 
        with combined sewer overflow control plans adopted by, 
        and currently being implemented by, the non-Federal 
        sponsor.
          (18) Colonias along united states-mexico border.--
        Wastewater treatment facilities, water systems 
        (including water treatment plants), intake structures, 
        raw water pipelines and pumps, distribution lines, and 
        pumps and storage tanks for colonias in the United 
        States along the United States-Mexico border.
          (19) Marana, arizona.--Wastewater treatment and 
        distribution infrastructure, Marana, Arizona.
          (20) Eastern arkansas enterprise community, 
        arkansas.--Water-related infrastructure, Eastern 
        Arkansas Enterprise Community, Cross, Lee, Monroe, and 
        St. Francis Counties, Arkansas.
          (21) Chino hills, california.--Storm water and sewage 
        collection infrastructure, Chino Hills, California.
          (22) Clear lake basin, california.--Water-related 
        infrastructure and resource protection, Clear Lake 
        Basin, California.
          (23) Desert hot springs, california.--Resource 
        protection and wastewater infrastructure, Desert Hot 
        Springs, California.
          (24) Eastern municipal water district, california.--
        Regional water-related infrastructure, Eastern 
        Municipal Water District, California.
          (25) Huntington beach, california.--Water supply and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Huntington Beach, 
        California.
          (26) Inglewood, california.--Water infrastructure, 
        Inglewood, California.
          (27) Los osos, california.--Wastewater 
        infrastructure, Los Osos, California.
          (28) Norwalk, california.--Water-related 
        infrastructure, Norwalk, California.
          (29) Key biscayne, florida.--Sanitary sewer 
        infrastructure, Key Biscayne, Florida.
          (30) South tampa, florida.--Water supply and aquifer 
        storage and recovery infrastructure, South Tampa, 
        Florida.
          (31) Fort wayne, indiana.--Combined sewer overflow 
        infrastructure and wetlands protection, Fort Wayne, 
        Indiana.
          (32) Indianapolis, indiana.--Combined sewer overflow 
        infrastructure, Indianapolis, Indiana.
          (33) St. charles, st. bernard, and plaquemines 
        parishes, louisiana.--Water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, St. Charles, St. Bernard, and 
        Plaquemines Parishes, Louisiana.
          (34) St. john the baptist and st. james parishes, 
        louisiana.--Water and sewer improvements, St. John the 
        Baptist and St. James Parishes, Louisiana.
          (35) Union county, north carolina.--Water 
        infrastructure, Union County, North Carolina.
          (36) Hood river, oregon.--Water transmission 
        infrastructure, Hood River, Oregon.
          (37) Medford, oregon.--Sewer collection 
        infrastructure, Medford, Oregon.
          (38) Portland, oregon.--Water infrastructure and 
        resource protection, Portland, Oregon.
          (39) Coudersport, pennsylvania.--Sewer system 
        extensions and improvements, Coudersport, Pennsylvania.
          (40) Park city, utah.--Water supply infrastructure, 
        Park City, Utah.
          (41) Winchester, kentucky.--Wastewater 
        infrastructure, Winchester, Kentucky.
  (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to 
be appropriated for providing assistance under this section 
$30,000,000. Such sums shall remain available until expended.
  (e) Authorization of Appropriations for Construction 
Assistance.--There are authorized to be appropriated for 
providing construction assistance under this section--
          (1) $32,500,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(5);
          (2) $2,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(6);
          (3) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(7);
          (4) $11,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(8);
          (5) $25,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(2);
          (6) $30,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(9);
          (7) $30,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(16);
          (8) $30,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(17);
          (9) $35,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(18);
          (10) $27,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(19);
          (11) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(20);
          (12) $35,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(23);
          (13) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(25);
          (14) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(26);
          (15) $35,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(27);
          (16) $20,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(28); and
          (17) $30,000,000 for the project described in 
        subsection (c)(40).
  (f) Additional Assistance.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance under subsection (a) and assistance for construction 
for the following:
          (1) Atlanta, georgia.--The project described in 
        subsection (c)(2), modified to include watershed 
        restoration and development in the regional Atlanta 
        watershed, including Big Creek and Rock Creek.
          (2) Paterson, passaic county, and passaic valley, new 
        jersey.--The project described in subsection (c)(9), 
        modified to include drainage facilities to alleviate 
        flooding problems on Getty Avenue in the vicinity of 
        St. Joseph's Hospital for the city of Paterson, New 
        Jersey, and Passaic County, New Jersey, and innovative 
        facilities to manage and treat additional flows in the 
        Passaic Valley, Passaic River basin, New Jersey.
          (3) Nashua, new hampshire.--$20,000,000 for a project 
        to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the 
        city of Nashua, New Hampshire.
          (4) Fall river and new bedford, massachusetts.--
        $35,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control 
        combined sewer overflows in the cities of Fall River 
        and New Bedford, Massachusetts.
          (5) Findlay township, pennsylvania.--$11,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure in Findlay 
        Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
          (6) Dillsburg borough authority, pennsylvania.--
        $2,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure in 
        Franklin Township, York County, Pennsylvania.
          (7) Hampden township, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 for 
        water, sewer, and storm sewer improvements in Hampden 
        Township, Pennsylvania.
          (8) Towamencin township, pennsylvania.--$1,500,000 
        for sanitary sewer and water and wastewater 
        infrastructure in Towamencin Township, Pennsylvania.
          (9) Dauphin county, pennsylvania.--$2,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows and water system rehabilitation for the city 
        of Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania.
          (10) Eastern shore and southwest virginia.--
                  (A) In general.--$20,000,000 for water 
                supply, wastewater infrastructure, and 
                environmental restoration projects in the 
                counties of Accomac, Northampton, Lee, Norton, 
                Wise, Scott, Russell, Dickenson, Buchanan, and 
                Tazewell, Virginia.
                  (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
          (11) Northeast pennsylvania.--$20,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure in the counties of Lackawanna, 
        Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, Wayne, Sullivan, 
        Bradford, Northumberland, Union, Snyder, Luzerne, and 
        Monroe, Pennsylvania, including assistance for the 
        Mountoursville Regional Sewer Authority, Lycoming 
        County, Pennsylvania.
          (12) Calumet region, indiana.--
                  (A) In general.--$100,000,000 for water 
                related infrastructure projects in the counties 
                of Benton, Jasper, Lake, Newton, and Porter, 
                Indiana.
                  (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of planning and design work 
                carried out by the non-Federal interest for the 
                project before the date of the partnership 
                agreement for the project.
          (13) Clinton county, pennsylvania.--$2,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure in Clinton County, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (14) Patton township, pennsylvania.--$1,400,000 for 
        water related infrastructure in Patton Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (15) North fayette township, allegheny county, 
        pennsylvania.--$500,000 for water related 
        infrastructure in North Fayette Township, Allegheny 
        County, Pennsylvania.
          (16) Springdale borough, pennsylvania.--$500,000 for 
        water related infrastructure in Springdale Borough, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (17) Robinson township, pennsylvania.--$1,200,000 for 
        water related infrastructure in Robinson Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (18) Upper allen township, pennsylvania.--$3,400,000 
        for water related infrastructure in Upper Allen 
        Township, Pennsylvania.
          (19) Jefferson township, greene county, 
        pennsylvania.--$1,000,000 for water related 
        infrastructure in Jefferson Township, Greene County, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (20) Lumberton, north carolina.--$1,700,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure projects in Lumberton, 
        North Carolina.
          (21) Baton rouge, louisiana.--$35,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure for the parishes of East Baton 
        Rouge, Ascension, and Livingston, Louisiana.
          (22) East san joaquin county, california.--
                  (A) In general.--$25,000,000 for ground water 
                recharge and conjunctive use projects in 
                Stockton East Water District, California.
                  (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of design and construction 
                work carried out by the non-Federal interest 
                for the project before the date of the 
                partnership agreement for the project.
                  (C) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal 
                interest may provide any portion of the non-
                Federal share of the cost of the project in the 
                form of in-kind services and materials.
          (23) Sacramento area, california.--$35,000,000 for 
        regional water conservation and recycling projects in 
        Placer and El Dorado Counties and the San Juan Suburban 
        Water District, California.
          (24) Cumberland county, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for 
        water supply projects in Cumberland County, Tennessee.
          (25) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--
        [$60,000,000] $89,550,000 for wastewater treatment and 
        water supply treatment and distribution projects in the 
        counties of Berkeley, Calhoun, Clarendon, Colleton, 
        Dorchester, and Orangeberg, South Carolina.
          (26) Bridgeport, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Bridgeport, Connecticut.
          (27) Hartford, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Hartford, Connecticut.
          (28) New haven, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of New Haven, Connecticut.
          (29) Oakland county, michigan.--$20,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the cities of Berkley, Ferndale, Madison 
        Heights, Royal Oak, Birmingham, Hazel Park, Oak Park, 
        Southfield, Clawson, Huntington Woods, Pleasant Ridge, 
        and Troy, and the village of Beverly Hills, and the 
        Charter Township of Royal Oak, Michigan.
          (30) Desoto county, mississippi.--$75,000,000 for a 
        wastewater infrastructure project in the county of 
        DeSoto, Mississippi.
          (31) Kansas city, missouri.--$15,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Kansas City, Missouri.
          (32) St. louis, missouri.--$35,000,000 for projects 
        to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the 
        city of St. Louis and St. Louis County, Missouri.
          (33) Elizabeth, new jersey.--$10,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Elizabeth, New Jersey.
          (34) North hudson, new jersey.--$20,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows for the North Hudson Sewerage Authority, New 
        Jersey.
          (35) Inner harbor project, new york, new york.--
        $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control 
        combined sewer overflows for the inner harbor project, 
        New York, New York.
          (36) Outer harbor project, new york, new york.--
        $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control 
        combined sewer overflows for the outer harbor project, 
        New York, New York.
          (37) Lebanon, new hampshire.--$8,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the city of Lebanon, New Hampshire.
          (38) Astoria, oregon.--$5,000,000 for a project to 
        eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the 
        city of Astoria, Oregon.
          (39) Cache county, utah.--$5,000,000 for a wastewater 
        infrastructure project for Cache County, Utah.
          (40) Lawton, oklahoma.--$5,000,000 for a wastewater 
        infrastructure project for the city of Lawton, 
        Oklahoma.
          (41) Lancaster, california.--$1,500,000 for a project 
        to provide water facilities for the Fox Field 
        Industrial Corridor, Lancaster, California.
          (42) San ramon valley, california.--$15,000,000 for a 
        project for recycled water for San Ramon Valley, 
        California.
          (43) Harbor/south bay, california.--[$35,000,000] 
        $70,000,000 for an industrial water reuse project for 
        the Harbor/South Bay area, California.
          (45) Washington, d.c., and maryland.--$15,000,000 for 
        the project described in subsection (c)(1), modified to 
        include measures to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the Anacostia River watershed.
          (46) Duck river, cullman, alabama.--$5,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Duck River, Cullman, 
        Alabama.
          (47) Union county, arkansas.--$52,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, including facilities for 
        withdrawal, treatment, and distribution, Union County, 
        Arkansas.
          (48) Cambria, california.--
                  (A) In general.--$10,300,000 for desalination 
                infrastructure, Cambria, California.
                  (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project not to exceed $3,000,000 for the cost 
                of planning and design work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
          (49) Los angeles harbor/terminal island, 
        california.--$6,500,000 for wastewater recycling 
        infrastructure, Los Angeles Harbor/Terminal Island, 
        California.
          (50) North valley region, lancaster, california.--
        $24,500,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
        North Valley Region, Lancaster, California.
          (51) San diego county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
        water-related infrastructure, San Diego County, 
        California.
          (52) South perris, california.--$25,000,000 for water 
        supply desalination infrastructure, South Perris, 
        California.
          (53) Aurora, illinois.--$8,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure to reduce or eliminate combined sewer 
        overflows, Aurora, Illinois.
          (54) Cook county, illinois.--$35,000,000 for water-
        related infrastructure and resource protection and 
        development, Cook County, Illinois.
          (55) Madison and st. clair counties, illinois.--
        $10,000,000 for water and wastewater assistance, 
        Madison and St. Clair Counties, Illinois.
          (56) Iberia parish, louisiana.--$5,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, Iberia Parish, 
        Louisiana.
          (57) Kenner, louisiana.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Kenner, Louisiana.
          (58) Benton harbor, michigan.--$1,500,000 for water-
        related infrastructure, City of Benton Harbor, 
        Michigan.
          (59) Genesee county, michigan.--$6,700,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure assistance to reduce or 
        eliminate sewer overflows, Genesee County, Michigan.
          (60) Negaunee, michigan.--$10,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure assistance, City of Negaunee, Michigan.
          (61) Garrison, crow wing county, mille lacs county, 
        mille lacs indian reservation, and kathio township, 
        minnesota.--$17,000,000 for a wastewater infrastructure 
        project for the city of Garrison, Crow Wing County, 
        Mille Lacs County, Mille Lacs Indian Reservation 
        established by the treaty of February 22, 1855 (10 
        Stat. 1165), and Kathio Township, Minnesota. Such 
        assistance shall be provided directly to the Garrison-
        Kathio-West Mille Lacs Lake Sanitary District, 
        Minnesota, except for assistance provided directly to 
        the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe at the discretion of the 
        Secretary.
          (62) Newton, new jersey.--$7,000,000 for water 
        filtration infrastructure, Newton, New Jersey.
          (63) Liverpool, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure, including a pump station, Liverpool, 
        New York.
          (64) Stanly county, north carolina.--$8,900,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure, Stanly County, 
        North Carolina.
          (65) Yukon, oklahoma.--$5,500,000 for water-related 
        infrastructure, including wells, booster stations, 
        storage tanks, and transmission lines, Yukon, Oklahoma.
          (66) Allegheny county, pennsylvania.--
                  (A) In general.--$20,000,000 for water-
                related environmental infrastructure, Allegheny 
                County, Pennsylvania.
                  (B) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit, in 
                accordance with section 221 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
                project the cost of work carried out by the 
                non-Federal interest for the project before the 
                date of the partnership agreement for the 
                project.
          (67) Mount joy township and conewago township, 
        pennsylvania.--$8,300,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Mount Joy Township and Conewago 
        Township, Pennsylvania.
          (68) Phoenixville borough, chester county, 
        pennsylvania.--$2,400,000 for water and sewer 
        infrastructure, Phoenixville Borough, Chester County, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (69) Titusville, pennsylvania.--$7,300,000 for storm 
        water separation and treatment plant upgrades, 
        Titusville, Pennsylvania.
          (70) Washington, greene, westmoreland, and fayette 
        counties, pennsylvania.--$8,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Washington, Greene, 
        Westmoreland, and Fayette Counties, Pennsylvania.
          (71) Coronado, california.--
                  (A) $10,000,000 is authorized for wastewater 
                infrastructure, Coronado, California.
                  (B) The Federal Share may be in the form of 
                grants or reimbursements of project costs 
                incurred by the non-Federal sponsor for work 
                performed by the non-Federal sponsor before or 
                after the execution of a project cooperation 
                agreement, if the Secretary determines that 
                such work is integral to the project.
                  (C) The Secretary is authorized to credit 
                towards the non-Federal share of project costs 
                the costs incurred by the non-Federal sponsor 
                for work performed by the non-Federal sponsor 
                before or after the execution of a project 
                cooperation agreement, if the Secretary 
                determines that such work is integral to the 
                project.
          (72) Charleston, south carolina.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including wastewater 
        collection systems, and stormwater system improvements, 
        Charleston, South Carolina.
          (73) Placer and el dorado counties, california.--
        $35,000,000 to improve the efficiency and use of 
        existing water supplies in Placer and El Dorado 
        Counties, California, through water and wastewater 
        projects, programs, and infrastructure.
          (74) Lassen, plumas, butte, sierra, and nevada 
        counties, california.--$25,000,000 to improve the 
        efficiency and use of existing water supplies in the 
        counties of Lassen, Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and Nevada, 
        California, through water and waste water projects, 
        programs, and infrastructure.
          (75) Indianapolis, indiana.--$6,430,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indiana.
          (76) St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin.--$5,000,000 for 
        waste water infrastructure, St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin.
          (77) Alpine, california.--$10,000,000 is authorized 
        for a water transmission main, Alpine, CA.
          (78) St. clair county, blount county, and cullman 
        county, alabama.--$5,000,000 for water related 
        infrastructure, St. Clair County, Blount County, and 
        Cullman County, Alabama.
          (79) Crawford county, arkansas.--$35,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Crawford County, Arkansas.
          (80) Alameda and contra costa counties, california.--
        $25,000,000 for recycled water treatment facilities 
        within the East Bay Municipal Utility District service 
        area, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California.
          (81) Aliso creek, orange county, california.--
        $5,000,000 for water related infrastructure, Aliso 
        Creek, Orange County, California.
          (82) Amador county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure, 
        Amador County, California.
          (83) Arcadia, sierra madre, and upland, california.--
        $33,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
        Arcadia, Sierra Madre, and Upland, California, 
        including $13,000,000 for stormwater infrastructure for 
        Upland, California.
          (84) Big bear area regional wastewater agency, 
        california.--$15,000,000 for water reclamation and 
        distribution infrastructure, Big Bear Area Regional 
        Wastewater Agency, California.
          (85) Brawley colonia, imperial county, california.--
        $1,400,000 for water infrastructure to improve water 
        quality in the Brawley Colonia Water District, Imperial 
        County, California.
          (86) Calaveras county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        water supply and wastewater infrastructure improvement 
        projects in Calaveras County, California, including 
        wastewater reclamation, recycling, and conjunctive use 
        projects.
          (87) Contra costa water district, california.--
        $23,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure for 
        the Contra Costa Water District, California.
          (88) East bay, san francisco, and santa clara areas, 
        california.--$4,000,000 for a desalination project to 
        serve the East Bay, San Francisco, and Santa Clara 
        areas, California.
          (89) East palo alto, california.--$4,000,000 for a 
        new pump station and stormwater management and drainage 
        system, East Palo Alto, California.
          (90) Imperial county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, including a wastewater 
        disinfection facility and polishing system, to improve 
        water quality in the vicinity of Calexico, California, 
        on the southern New River, Imperial County, California.
          (91) La habra, california.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        and water related infrastructure, city of La Habra, 
        California.
          (92) La mirada, california.--$4,000,000 for the 
        planning, design, and construction of a stormwater 
        program in La Mirada, California.
          (93) Los angeles county, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, Diamond 
        Bar, La Habra Heights, and Rowland Heights, Los Angeles 
        County, California.
          (94) Los angeles county, california.--$20,000,000 for 
        the planning, design, and construction of water related 
        infrastructure for Santa Monica Bay and the coastal 
        zone of Los Angeles County, California.
          (95) Malibu, california.--$3,000,000 for municipal 
        wastewater and recycled water infrastructure, Malibu 
        Creek Watershed Protection Project, Malibu, California.
          (96) Montebello, california.--$4,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements in south Montebello, 
        California.
          (97) New river, california.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure to improve water quality in 
        the New River, California.
          (98) Orange county, california.--$10,000,000 for 
        wastewater and water related infrastructure, Anaheim, 
        Brea, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, and Yorba 
        Linda, Orange County, California.
          (99) Port of stockton, stockton, california.--
        $3,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure 
        projects for Rough and Ready Island and vicinity, 
        Stockton, California.
          (100) Perris, california.--$3,000,000 for recycled 
        water transmission infrastructure, Eastern Municipal 
        Water District, Perris, California.
          (101) San bernardino county, california.--$9,000,000 
        for wastewater and water related infrastructure, Chino 
        and Chino Hills, San Bernardino County, California.
          (102) Santa clara county, california.--$5,500,000 for 
        an advanced recycling water treatment plant in Santa 
        Clara County, California.
          (103) Santa monica, california.--$3,000,000 for 
        improving water system reliability, Santa Monica, 
        California.
          (104) Southern los angeles county, california.--
        $15,000,000 for environmental infrastructure for the 
        groundwater basin optimization pipeline, Southern Los 
        Angeles County, California.
          (105) Stockton, california.--$33,000,000 for water 
        treatment and distribution infrastructure, Stockton, 
        California.
          (106) Sweetwater reservoir, san diego county, 
        california.--$375,000 to improve water quality and 
        remove nonnative aquatic nuisance species from the 
        Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.
          (107) Whittier, california.--$8,000,000 for water, 
        wastewater, and water related infrastructure, Whittier, 
        California.
          (108) Arkansas valley conduit, colorado.--$10,000,000 
        for the Arkansas Valley Conduit, Colorado.
          (109) Boulder county, colorado.--$10,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Boulder County, Colorado.
          (110) Montezuma and la plata counties, colorado.--
        $1,000,000 for water and wastewater related 
        infrastructure for the Ute Mountain project, Montezuma 
        and La Plata Counties, Colorado.
          (111) Otero, bent, crowley, kiowa, and prowers 
        counties, colorado.--$35,000,000 for water transmission 
        infrastructure, Otero, Bent, Crowley, Kiowa, and 
        Prowers Counties, Colorado.
          (112) Pueblo and otero counties, colorado.--
        $34,000,000 for water transmission infrastructure, 
        Pueblo and Otero Counties, Colorado.
          (113) Enfield, connecticut.--$1,000,000 for 
        infiltration and inflow correction, Enfield, 
        Connecticut.
          (114) Ledyard and montville, connecticut.--$7,113,000 
        for water infrastructure, Ledyard and Montville, 
        Connecticut.
          (115) New haven, connecticut.--$300,000 for 
        stormwater system improvements, New Haven, Connecticut.
          (116) Norwalk, connecticut.--$3,000,000 for the 
        Keeler Brook Storm Water Improvement Project, Norwalk, 
        Connecticut.
          (117) Plainville, connecticut.--$6,280,000 for 
        wastewater treatment, Plainville, Connecticut.
          (118) Southington, connecticut.--$9,420,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Southington, Connecticut.
          (119) Anacostia river, district of columbia and 
        maryland.--$20,000,000 for environmental infrastructure 
        and resource protection and development to enhance 
        water quality and living resources in the Anacostia 
        River watershed, District of Columbia and Maryland.
          (120) District of columbia.--$35,000,000 for 
        implementation of a combined sewer overflow long-term 
        control plan in the District of Columbia.
          (121) Charlotte county, florida.--$3,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Charlotte County, Florida.
          (122) Charlotte, lee, and collier counties, 
        florida.--$20,000,000 for water supply 
        interconnectivity infrastructure, Charlotte, Lee, and 
        Collier Counties, Florida.
          (123) Collier county, florida.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure to improve water quality in the vicinity 
        of the Gordon River, Collier County, Florida.
          (124) Hillsborough county, florida.--$6,250,000 for 
        water infrastructure and supply enhancement, 
        Hillsborough County, Florida.
          (125) Jacksonville, florida.--$25,000,000 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure, including septic 
        tank replacements, Jacksonville, Florida.
          (126) Sarasota county, florida.--$10,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure in Sarasota County, 
        Florida.
          (127) South seminole and north orange county, 
        florida.--$30,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure for 
        the South Seminole and North Orange Wastewater 
        Transmission Authority, Florida.
          (128) Miami-dade county, florida.--$6,250,000 for 
        water reuse supply and a water transmission pipeline, 
        Miami-Dade County, Florida.
          (129) Palm beach county, florida.--$7,500,000 for 
        water infrastructure, Palm Beach County, Florida.
          (130) Albany, georgia.--$4,000,000 for a storm 
        drainage system, Albany, Georgia.
          (131) Banks county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Banks County, Georgia.
          (132) Berrien county, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Berrien County, Georgia.
          (133) Chattooga county, georgia.--$8,000,000 for 
        wastewater and drinking water infrastructure 
        improvement, Chattooga County, Georgia.
          (134) Chattooga, floyd, gordon, walker, and 
        whitifield counties, georgia.--$10,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Armuchee Valley, 
        Chattooga, Floyd, Gordon, Walker, and Whitifield 
        Counties, Georgia.
          (135) Dahlonega, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, Dahlonega, Georgia.
          (136) East point, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure improvements, city of East Point, 
        Georgia.
          (137) Fayetteville, grantville, lagrange, pine 
        mountain (harris county), douglasville, and carrollton, 
        georgia.--$24,500,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Fayetteville, Grantville, LaGrange, 
        Pine Mountain (Harris County), Douglasville, and 
        Carrollton, Georgia.
          (138) Meriwether and spalding counties, georgia.--
        $7,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, 
        Meriwether and Spalding Counties, Georgia.
          (139) Moultrie, georgia.--$5,000,000 for water supply 
        infrastructure, Moultrie, Georgia.
          (140) Stephens county/city of toccoa, georgia.--
        $8,000,000 water infrastructure improvements, Stephens 
        County/city of Toccoa, Georgia.
          (141) North vernon and butlerville, indiana.--
        $1,700,000 for wastewater infrastructure, North Vernon 
        and Butlerville, Indiana.
          (142) Salem, washington county, indiana.--$3,200,000 
        for water supply infrastructure, Salem, Washington 
        County, Indiana.
          (143) Atchison, kansas.--$20,000,000 to address 
        combined sewer overflows, Atchison, Kansas.
          (144) Central kentucky.--$10,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure and resource protection and 
        development, Scott, Franklin, Woodford, Anderson, 
        Fayette, Mercer, Jessamine, Boyle, Lincoln, Garrard, 
        Madison, Estill, Powell, Clark, Montgomery, and Bourbon 
        Counties, Kentucky.
          (145) Lafayette, louisiana.--$1,200,000 for water and 
        wastewater improvements, Lafayette, Louisiana.
          (146) Lafourche parish, louisiana.--$2,300,000 for 
        measures to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into the 
        freshwater system, Lafourche Parish, Louisiana.
          (147) Lake charles, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater improvements, Lake Charles, Louisiana.
          (148) Northwest louisiana council of governments, 
        louisiana.--$2,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        improvements, Northwest Louisiana Council of 
        Governments, Louisiana.
          (149) Ouachita parish, louisiana.--$1,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater improvements, Ouachita Parish, 
        Louisiana.
          (150) Plaquemine, louisiana.--$7,000,000 for sanitary 
        sewer and wastewater infrastructure, Plaquemine, 
        Louisiana.
          (151) Rapides area planning commission, louisiana.--
        $1,000,000 for water and wastewater improvements, 
        Rapides, Louisiana.
          (152) Shreveport, louisiana.--$20,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure in Shreveport, Louisiana.
          (153) South central planning and development 
        commission, louisiana.--$2,500,000 for water and 
        wastewater improvements, South Central Planning and 
        Development Commission, Louisiana.
          (154) Union-lincoln regional water supply project, 
        louisiana.--$2,000,000 for the Union-Lincoln Regional 
        Water Supply project, Louisiana.
          (155) Chesapeake bay improvements, maryland, 
        virginia, and district of columbia.--$30,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure projects to benefit the 
        Chesapeake Bay, including the nutrient removal project 
        at the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment facility in the 
        District of Columbia.
          (156) Chesapeake bay region, maryland and virginia.--
        $40,000,000 for water pollution control, Chesapeake Bay 
        Region, Maryland and Virginia.
          (157) Michigan combined sewer overflows.--$35,000,000 
        for correction of combined sewer overflows, Michigan.
          (158) Central iron range sanitary sewer district, 
        minnesota.--$12,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure 
        for the Central Iron Range Sanitary Sewer District to 
        serve the cities of Hibbing, Chisholm, Buhl, and 
        Kinney, and Balkan and Great Scott Townships, 
        Minnesota.
          (159) Central lake region sanitary district, 
        minnesota.--$2,000,000 for sanitary sewer and 
        wastewater infrastructure for the Central Lake Region 
        Sanitary District, Minnesota, to serve Le Grande and 
        Moe Townships, Minnesota.
          (160) Goodview, minnesota.--$3,000,000 for water 
        quality infrastructure, Goodview, Minnesota.
          (161) Grand rapids, minnesota.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Grand Rapids, Minnesota.
          (162) Willmar, minnesota.--$15,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Willmar, Minnesota.
          (163) Biloxi, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater related infrastructure, city of Biloxi, 
        Mississippi.
          (164) Corinth, mississippi.--$7,500,000 for a surface 
        water program, city of Corinth, Mississippi.
          (165) Gulfport, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater related infrastructure, city of 
        Gulfport, Mississippi.
          (166) Harrison county, mississippi.--$5,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater related infrastructure, Harrison 
        County, Mississippi.
          (167) Jackson, mississippi.--$25,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, Jackson, Mississippi.
          (168) Clark county, nevada.--$30,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Clark County, Nevada.
          (169) Clean water coalition, nevada.--$50,000,000 for 
        the Systems Conveyance and Operations Program, Clark 
        County, Henderson, Las Vegas, and North Las Vegas, 
        Nevada.
          (170) Glendale dam diversion structure, nevada.--
        $10,000,000 for water system improvements to the 
        Glendale Dam Diversion Structure for the Truckee 
        Meadows Water Authority, Nevada.
          (171) Henderson, nevada.--$13,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Henderson, Nevada.
          (172) Indian springs, nevada.--$12,000,000 for 
        construction of wastewater system improvements for the 
        Indian Springs community, Nevada.
          (173) Reno, nevada.--$13,000,000 for construction of 
        a water conservation project for the Highland Canal, 
        Mogul Bypass in Reno, Nevada.
          (174) Washoe county, nevada.--$14,000,000 for 
        construction of water infrastructure improvements to 
        the Huffaker Hills Reservoir Conservation Project, 
        Washoe County, Nevada.
          (175) Cranford township, new jersey.--$6,000,000 for 
        storm sewer improvements, Cranford Township, New 
        Jersey.
          (176) Middletown township, new jersey.--$1,100,000 
        for storm sewer improvements, Middletown Township, New 
        Jersey.
          (177) Paterson, new jersey.--$35,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Paterson, New Jersey.
          (178) Rahway valley, new jersey.--$25,000,000 for 
        sanitary sewer and storm sewer improvements in the 
        service area of the Rahway Valley Sewerage Authority, 
        New Jersey.
          (179) Babylon, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Town of Babylon, New York.
          (180) Ellicottville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply, water, and wastewater infrastructure in 
        Ellicottville, New York.
          (181) Elmira, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Elmira, New York.
          (182) Essex hamlet, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Essex Hamlet, New York.
          (183) Fleming, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking 
        water infrastructure, Fleming, New York.
          (184) Kiryas joel, new york.--$5,000,000 for drinking 
        water infrastructure, village of Kiryas Joel, New York.
          (185) Niagara falls, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Niagara Falls Water Board, 
        New York.
          (186) Patchogue, new york.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, village of Patchogue, New York.
          (187) Sennett, new york.--$1,500,000 for water 
        infrastructure, town of Sennett, New York.
          (188) Springport and fleming, new york.--$10,000,000 
        for water related infrastructure, including water 
        mains, pump stations, and water storage tanks, 
        Springport and Fleming, New York.
          (189) Wellsville, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply, water, and wastewater infrastructure in 
        Wellsville, New York.
          (190) Yates county, new york.--$5,000,000 for 
        drinking water infrastructure, Yates County, New York.
          (191) Cabarrus county, north carolina.--$4,500,000 
        for water related infrastructure, Cabarrus County, 
        North Carolina.
          (192) Cary, wake county, north carolina.--$4,000,000 
        for a water reclamation facility, Cary, Wake County, 
        North Carolina.
          (193) Charlotte, north carolina.--$14,000,000 for the 
        Briar Creek Relief Sewer project, city of Charlotte, 
        North Carolina.
          (194) Fayetteville, cumberland county, north 
        carolina.--$6,000,000 for water and sewer upgrades, 
        city of Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North 
        Carolina.
          (195) Mooresville, north carolina.--$4,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure improvements, town 
        of Mooresville, North Carolina.
          (196) Neuse regional water and sewer authority, north 
        carolina.--$4,000,000 for the Neuse regional drinking 
        water facility, Kinston, North Carolina.
          (197) Richmond county, north carolina.--$13,500,000 
        for water related infrastructure, Richmond County, 
        North Carolina.
          (198) Union county, north carolina.--$6,000,000 for 
        water related infrastructure, Union County, North 
        Carolina.
          (199) Washington county, north carolina.--$1,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure, Washington 
        County, North Carolina.
          (200) Winston-salem, north carolina.--$3,000,000 for 
        stormwater upgrades, city of Winston-Salem, North 
        Carolina.
          (201) North dakota.--$15,000,000 for water-related 
        infrastructure, North Dakota.
          (202) Devils lake, north dakota.--$15,000,000 for 
        water supply infrastructure, Devils Lake, North Dakota.
          (203) Saipan, northern mariana islands.--$20,000,000 
        for water related infrastructure, Saipan, Northern 
        Mariana Islands.
          (204) Akron, ohio.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Akron, Ohio.
          (205) Burr oak regional water district, ohio.--
        $4,000,000 for construction of a water line to extend 
        from a well field near Chauncey, Ohio, to a water 
        treatment plant near Millfield, Ohio.
          (206) Cincinnati, ohio.--$1,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Cincinnati, Ohio.
          (207) Cleveland, ohio.--$2,500,000 for Flats East 
        Bank water and wastewater infrastructure, city of 
        Cleveland, Ohio.
          (208) Columbus, ohio.--$4,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Columbus, Ohio.
          (209) Dayton, ohio.--$1,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Dayton, Ohio.
          (210) Defiance county, ohio.--$1,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Defiance County, Ohio.
          (211) Fostoria, ohio.--$2,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Fostoria, Ohio.
          (212) Fremont, ohio.--$2,000,000 for construction of 
        off-stream water supply reservoir, Fremont, Ohio.
          (213) Lake county, ohio.--$1,500,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Lake County, Ohio.
          (214) Lawrence county, ohio.--$5,000,000 for Union 
        Rome wastewater infrastructure, Lawrence County, Ohio.
          (215) Meigs county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to extend the 
        Tupper Plains Regional Water District water line to 
        Meigs County, Ohio.
          (216) Mentor-on-lake, ohio.--$625,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Mentor-on-Lake, Ohio.
          (217) Vinton county, ohio.--$1,000,000 to construct 
        water lines in Vinton and Brown Townships, Ohio.
          (218) Willowick, ohio.--$665,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Willowick, Ohio.
          (219) Ada, oklahoma.--$1,700,000 for sewer 
        improvements and other water infrastructure, city of 
        Ada, Oklahoma.
          (220) Alva, oklahoma.--$250,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure improvements, city of Alva, Oklahoma.
          (221) Ardmore, oklahoma.--$1,900,000 for water and 
        sewer infrastructure improvements, city of Ardmore, 
        Oklahoma.
          (222) Bartlesville, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, city of Bartlesville, Oklahoma.
          (223) Bethany, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, city of 
        Bethany, Oklahoma.
          (224) Chickasha, oklahoma.--$650,000 for industrial 
        park sewer infrastructure, city of Chickasha, Oklahoma.
          (225) Disney and langley, oklahoma.--$2,500,000 for 
        water and sewer improvements and water related 
        infrastructure, cities of Disney and Langley, Oklahoma.
          (226) Durant, oklahoma.--$3,300,000 for bayou 
        restoration and water related infrastructure, city of 
        Durant, Oklahoma.
          (227) Eastern oklahoma state university, wilberton, 
        oklahoma.--$1,000,000 for sewer and utility upgrades 
        and water related infrastructure, Eastern Oklahoma 
        State University, Wilberton, Oklahoma.
          (228) Guymon, oklahoma.--$16,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater related infrastructure, city of Guymon, 
        Oklahoma.
          (229) Konawa, oklahoma.--$500,000 for water treatment 
        infrastructure improvements, city of Konawa, Oklahoma.
          (230) Lugert-altus irrigation district, altus, 
        oklahoma.--$5,000,000 for water related infrastructure 
        improvements, Lugert-Altus Irrigation District, Altus, 
        Oklahoma.
          (231) Midwest city, oklahoma.--$2,000,000 for 
        improvements to water related infrastructure, the City 
        of Midwest City, Oklahoma.
          (232) Mustang, oklahoma.--$3,325,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, city of 
        Mustang, Oklahoma.
          (233) Norman, oklahoma.--$10,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure, Norman, Oklahoma.
          (234) Oklahoma panhandle state university, guymon, 
        oklahoma.--$275,000 for water testing facility and 
        water related infrastructure development, Oklahoma 
        Panhandle State University, Guymon, Oklahoma.
          (235) Weatherford, oklahoma.--$500,000 for arsenic 
        program and water related infrastructure, city of 
        Weatherford, Oklahoma.
          (236) Woodward, oklahoma.--$1,500,000 for water 
        improvements and water related infrastructure, 
        Woodward, Oklahoma.
          (237) Albany, oregon.--$35,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure to improve habitat restoration, Albany, 
        Oregon.
          (238) Beaver creek reservoir, pennsylvania.--
        $3,000,000 for projects for water supply and related 
        activities, Beaver Creek Reservoir, Clarion County, 
        Beaver and Salem Townships, Pennsylvania.
          (239) Hatfield borough, pennsylvania.--$310,000 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure for Hatfield Borough, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (240) Lehigh county, pennsylvania.--$5,000,000 for 
        stormwater control measures and storm sewer 
        improvements, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
          (241) North wales borough, pennsylvania.--$1,516,584 
        for wastewater related infrastructure for North Wales 
        Borough, Pennsylvania.
          (242) Pen argyl, pennsylvania.--$5,250,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania.
          (243) Philadelphia, pennsylvania.--$1,600,000 for 
        wastewater related infrastructure for Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania.
          (244) Stockerton borough, tatamy borough, and palmer 
        township, pennsylvania.--$10,000,000 for stormwater 
        control measures, particularly to address sinkholes, in 
        the vicinity of Stockerton Borough, Tatamy Borough, and 
        Palmer Township, Pennsylvania.
          (245) Vera cruz, pennsylvania.--$5,500,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Vera Cruz, Pennsylvania.
          (246) Commonwealth of puerto rico.--$35,000,000 for 
        water and wastewater infrastructure in the Commonwealth 
        of Puerto Rico.
          (247) Charleston, south carolina.--$4,000,000 for 
        stormwater control measures and storm sewer 
        improvements, Spring Street/Fishburne Street drainage 
        project, Charleston, South Carolina.
          (248) Charleston and west ashley, south carolina.--
        $6,000,000 for wastewater tunnel replacement, 
        Charleston and West Ashley, South Carolina.
          (249) Crooked creek, marlboro county, south 
        carolina.--$25,000,000 for a project for water storage 
        and water supply infrastructure on Crooked Creek, 
        Marlboro County, South Carolina.
          (250) Myrtle beach, south carolina.--$18,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including ocean outfalls, 
        Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
          (251) North myrtle beach, south carolina.--
        $11,000,000 for environmental infrastructure, including 
        ocean outfalls, North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
          (252) Surfside, south carolina.--$11,000,000 for 
        environmental infrastructure, including stormwater 
        system improvements and ocean outfalls, Surfside, South 
        Carolina.
          (253) Cheyenne river sioux reservation (dewey and 
        ziebach counties) and perkins and meade counties, south 
        dakota.--$65,000,000 for water related infrastructure, 
        Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation (Dewey and Ziebach 
        counties) and Perkins and Meade Counties, South Dakota.
          (254) Athens, tennessee.--$16,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Athens, Tennessee.
          (255) Blaine, tennessee.--$500,000 for water supply 
        and wastewater infrastructure, Blaine, Tennessee.
          (256) Claiborne county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for 
        water supply and wastewater infrastructure, Claiborne 
        County, Tennessee.
          (257) Giles county, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, county of Giles, 
        Tennessee.
          (258) Grainger county, tennessee.--$1,250,000 for 
        water supply and wastewater infrastructure, Grainger 
        County, Tennessee.
          (259) Hamilton county, tennessee.--$500,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, Hamilton County, 
        Tennessee.
          (260) Harrogate, tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, city of 
        Harrogate, Tennessee.
          (261) Johnson county, tennessee.--$600,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, Johnson County, 
        Tennessee.
          (262) Knoxville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, city of 
        Knoxville, Tennessee.
          (263) Nashville, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, Nashville, 
        Tennessee.
          (264) Lewis, lawrence, and wayne counties, 
        tennessee.--$2,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
        infrastructure, counties of Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne, 
        Tennessee.
          (265) Oak ridge, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water 
        supply and wastewater infrastructure, city of Oak 
        Ridge, Tennessee.
          (266) Plateau utility district, morgan county, 
        tennessee.--$1,000,000 for water supply and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Morgan County, Tennessee.
          (267) Shelby county, tennessee.--$4,000,000 for water 
        related environmental infrastructure, county of Shelby, 
        Tennessee.
          (268) Central texas.--$20,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure in Bosque, Brazos, Burleson, 
        Grimes, Hill, Hood, Johnson, Madison, McLennan, 
        Limestone, Robertson, and Somervell Counties, Texas.
          (269) El paso county, texas.--$25,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure and resource protection, 
        including stormwater management, and development, El 
        Paso County, Texas.
          (270) Ft. bend county, texas.--$20,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure, Ft. Bend County, Texas.
          (271) Duchesne, iron, and uintah counties, utah.--
        $10,800,000 for water related infrastructure, Duchesne, 
        Iron, and Uintah Counties, Utah.
          (272) Northern west virginia.--$20,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure in Hancock, Ohio, 
        Marshall, Wetzel, Tyler, Pleasants, Wood, Doddridge, 
        Monongalia, Marion, Harrison, Taylor, Barbour, Preston, 
        Tucker, Mineral, Grant, Gilmer, Brooke, and Ritchie 
        Counties, West Virginia.
          (273) United states virgin islands.--$25,000,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure for the St. Croix Anguilla 
        wastewater treatment plant and the St. Thomas Charlotte 
        Amalie wastewater treatment plant, United States Virgin 
        Islands.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

                                  [all]
```