UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case N o. _ __,;;;;2=2-...;Ca.,:;R;.;;;.-...;:;.8..;:;...01=7....;;;;3_ -C=AN~"""N"""' O'-"N""-'"'(s'""") __ _ 

18 U.S.C. § 2251(d) & (e) 

18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) & (b)(l) 

18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g) 

18 u.s.c. § 2253 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. 

GREGORY MALCOLM GOOD and 

WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN, 

Defendants. ________________ / 

SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT 

The Grand Jury charges that: 

COUNT 1 

18 U.S.C. § 2251(d) and (e) 

(Conspiracy to Advertise Child Pornography) 

NOV 17 2022 

ANGELA E. NOBLE 

CLERK U.S. DIST. CT. S.O. OF FLA. - W.P.B. 

Beginning in or around March 2018, the exact date being unknown to the Grand Jury, and 

conti nuing through on or about November 2, 2022, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District 

of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, 

GREGORY MALCOLM GOOD 

and 

WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN, 

did knowingly and willfully conspire with each other and with other persons known and unknown 

to the Grand Jury to knowingly make, print, and publish, and cause to be made, printed, and 

published, by means of an internet website whose common name is known to the Grand Jury and 

is referred to herein as "Website A," any notice and advertisement seeking and offering to receive, 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 1 of 7
exchange, buy, produce, display, distribute, and reproduce any visua l depiction, the production of 

such visual depiction invo lved the use of a minor engaging in sexua lly explicit conduct and such 

visual depiction was of such conduct, knowing and having reason to know that such notice and 

advertisement wou ld be transported using any means and fac ility of interstate and foreign 

commerce and in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce by any means including by 

computer, and such notice and adve rtisement was transported using any means and facility of 

interstate and fore ign commerce and in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce by any 

means including by computer, a ll in violation of Titl e 18, United States Code, Section 2251 (d) and 

(e). 

COUNT2 

18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) and (b)(l) 

(Conspiracy to Distribute Child Pornography) 

Beginning in or around March 20 18, the exact date being unknown to the Grand Jury, and 

continuing through on or about November 2, 2022, in Pa lm Beach County, in the Southern District 

of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, 

GREGORY MALCOLM GOOD 

and 

WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN, 

did knowingly and willfully conspire with each other and with other persons known and unknown 

to the Grand Jury to distribute child pornography, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8)(A), and 

material containing child pornography, by means of an internet website whose common name is 

known to the Grand Jury and is referred to herein as "Website A," using any means and facility of 

interstate and fore ign commerce, and that had been shipped and transported in and affecting 

interstate and fore ign commerce by any means, including by computer, all in vio lation of Title 18, 

United States Code, Section 2252A(a)(2) and (6)(1). 

2 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 2 of 7
COUNT3 

18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g) 

(Engaging in a Child Exploitation Enterprise) 

Beginning in or around March 20 18, and continuing through on or about November 2, 

2022, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, 

WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN, 

and other persons known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly engaged in a child 

exploitation enterprise, in that the defendant vio lated Chapte r 110 of Title 18 of the United States 

Code, as part of a seri es of fe lony violations constituting three or more separate inc idents and 

involving more than one v ictim, and committed those offenses in concert with three or more other 

persons, all in violation of Titl e 18, United States Code, Section 2252A(g). 

FORFEITURE 

1. The all egations of this Superseding Indictment are re-alleged and by this reference 

fu lly incorporated herein fo r the purpose of a ll eging forfe iture to the United States of America of 

certain property in which the defendants, GREGORY MALCOLM GOOD and WILLIAM 

MICHAEL SPEARMAN, have an interest. 

2. Upon conviction of a vio lation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 225 1 or 

2252A, as a ll eged in this Superseding Indictment, the defendants, GREGORY MALCOLM 

GOOD and WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to 

Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253: 

(a) any visual depiction described in T itle 18, United States Code, Sections 

225 1, 2251 A, 2252, 2252A, 2252B, or 2260 or any book, magazine, periodical, fi lm, videotape, 

or .other matter whi ch contains any such visual depiction, which was produced, transported, mailed, 

shipped or received in vio lation of Chapter 110 of Title 18, United States Code; 

3 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 3 of 7
(b) any property, real or personal, constituting or traceable to gross profits or 

other proceeds which the defendant obtained from such offense; and 

(c) any property, real or personal, used or intended to be used to commit or to 

promote the commission of the offense or any property traceable to such property; 

3. The property which is subj ect to forfeiture includes, but is not limited to, the 

following: 

i. The real property located at 11 5 Rolling Lea Pl., Madison, A labama 

35758. 

All pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253(a), and the procedures set forth 

at Titl e 21 , United States Code, Section 853, as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, 

Section 2253(b). 

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ 

UNITED ST A TES ATTORNEY 

~s~ ~ILLER 

ASSIST ANT UNITED STA TES ATTORNEY 

TRIAL ATTORNEY 

A TRUE BILL 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CRIMINAL DIVISJON 

CHILD EXPLOITATION AND OBSCENITY SECTION 

4 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 4 of 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE NO.: 22-CR-80173-CANNON(s) 

v. 

CERTIFICATE OF TRIAL ATTORNEY* 

GREGORY MALCOLM GOOD and 

WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN, Superseding Case Information: 

Defendants. I 

Court Division (select one) 

□ Miami □ Key West FTP 

New Defendant(s) (Yes or No) YES 

Number of New Defendants 1 

□ FTL El WPB Tota l number of New Counts 1 

I do hereby certify that: 

I . I have carefully considered the allegations of the indi ctment, the number of defendants, the number of probable 

witnesses and the legal complexities of the Indictment/Informatio n attached hereto. 

2. I am aware that the info rmation supplied on this statement wi ll be relied upon by the Judges of this Court in setting 

their calendars and scheduling criminal tri als under the mandate of the Speedy Tri al Act, Title 28 U.S.C. §3 16 1. 

3. Interpreter: (Yes or No) No 

List language and/or dialect: 

4. This case wi ll take 10 days for the parties to try. 

5. Please check appropriate category and type of offense listed below: 

(Check only one) (Check only one) 

I D O to 5 days D Petty 

II El 6 to 10 days D Minor 

III D 11 to 20 days D Misdemeanor 

IV D 21 to 60 days □ Felony 

V D 61 days and over 

6. Has this case been previ ously fi led in this District Cou rt? (Yes or No) Yes 

If yes, Case No.22-CR-80173-CANNON 

7. Has a complaint been fil ed in this matter? (Yes or No) Yes 

If yes, Magistrate Case No. 22-mj-08444; 22-mj-085 10 

8. Does this case relate to a previously fil ed matter in this District Court? (Yes or No)Yes 

If yes, Judge CANNON Case No. 22-CR-80107-AMC 

9. Defendant(s) in federa l custody as of October 4, 2022 (Good); November 2, 2022 (Spearman) 

10. Defendant(s) in state custody as of 

1 J. Rule 20 from the Distri ct of 

12. Is this a potential death penalty case? (Yes or No) No 

13. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office 

prior to August 8, 20 J 4 (Mag. Judge Shani ek Maynard? (Yes or No) No 

14. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office 

prior to October 3, 2019 (Mag. Judge Jared Strauss? (Yes or No) No 

By: 

Assistant United States Attorney 

FLA Bar No. 0648477 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 5 of 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENAL TY SHEET 

Defendant's Name: GREGORY MALCOLM GOOD 

Case No: __ 22_-_C_R_-8_0_1 _73_-_C_A_NN_O_N----'--(s-'--) ________________ _ 

Count #1: 

Conspiracy to advertise child pornography 

18 U.S.C. § 225 l(d) and (e) 

* Max. Term oflmprisonment: 30 years 

* Mandatory Min. Term oflmprisonment (if applicable): 15 years 

*Max.Supervised Release: Life (mandatory minimum term of 5 years) 

* Max. Fine: $250,000 fine and a $5 ,000 special assessment 

Count #2: 

Conspiracy to distribute child pornography 

18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) & (6)(1) 

* Max. Term oflmprisonment: 20 years 

* Mandatory Min. Term of Imprisonment (if applicable): 5 years 

*Max.Supervised Release: Life (mandatory minimum term of 5 years) 

* Max. Fine: $250,000 fine and a $5,000 special assessment 

*Refers only to possible term of incarceration, supervised release and fines. It does not include 

restitution, special assessments, parole terms, or forfeitures that may be applicable. 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 6 of 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENAL TY SHEET 

Defendant's Name: WILLIAM MICHAEL SPEARMAN 

Case No: 22-CR-80173-CANNON (s) 

Count #1: 

Conspiracy to advertise child pornography 

18 U.S.C. § 225 1(d) and (e) 

* Max. Term oflmprisonment: 30 years 

* Mandatory Min. Term oflmprisonment (if applicable): 15 years 

*Max.Supervised Release: Life (mandatory minimum term of 5 years) 

* Max. Fine: $250,000 fine and a $5,000 special assessment 

Count #2: 

Conspiracy to distribute child pornography 

18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) & (b)(l) 

* Max. Term oflmprisonment: 20 years 

* Mandatory Min. Term of Imprisonment (if applicable): 5 years 

* Max.Supervised Release: Life (mandatory minimum term of 5 years) 

* Max. Fine: $250,000 fine and a $5,000 spec ial assessment 

Count #3: 

Child exploitation enterprise 

18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g) 

* Max. Term oflmprisonment: Life 

* Mandatory Min. Term oflmprisonment (if applicable): 20 years 

*Max.Supervised Release: Life (mandatory minimum term of 5 years) 

* Max. Fine: $250,000 fine and a $5,000 special assessment 

*Refers only to possible term of incarceration, supervised release and fines. It does not include 

restitution, special assessments, parole terms, or forfeitures that may be applicable. 

Case 9:22-cr-80173-AMC Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 7 of 7