alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 162.80 Mississippi River below mouth of Ohio River, including South and Southwest passes. ( a ) *Mooring on the Mississippi River between miles 311.5 AHP and 340.0 AHP.* ( 1 ) No vessel or craft shall moor along either bank of the Mississippi River between miles 311.5 AHP and mile 340.0 AHP except in case of an emergency, pursuant to an approved navigation permit, or as authorized by the District Commander. Vessels may be moored any place outside the navigation channel in this reach in case of an emergency and then for only the minimum time required to terminate the emergency. When so moored, all vessels shall be securely tied with bow and stern lines of sufficient strength and fastenings to withstand currents, winds, wave action, suction from passing vessels or any other forces which might cause the vessels to break their moorings. When vessels are so moored, a guard shall be on board at all times to ensure that proper signals are displayed and that the vessels are securely and adequately moored.
( 2 ) Vessels may be moored any time at facilities constructed in accordance with an approved navigation permit or as authorized by the District Commander. When so moored, each vessel shall have sufficient fastenings to prevent the vessels from breaking loose by wind, current, wave action, suction from passing vessels or any other forces which might cause the vessel to break its mooring. The number of vessels in one fleet and the width of the fleet of vessels tied abreast shall not extend into the fairway or be greater than allowed under the permit.
( 3 ) Mariners should report immediately by radio or fastest available means to the lockmaster at Old River Lock or to any government patrol or survey boat in the vicinity any emergency mooring or vessels drifting uncontrolled within the area described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. It is the responsibility and duty of the master of a towing vessel releasing or mooring a vessel in this reach of the Mississippi River to report such action immediately.
( b ) *Mooring on Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, La., including South and Southwest Passes.* ( 1 ) When tied up individually or in fleets, vessels shall be moored with sufficient lines and shore fastenings to insure their remaining in place and withstanding the action of winds, currents and the suction of passing vessels.
Note:
The Corps of Engineers also has regulations dealing with this section in 33 CFR Part 207.
(Sec. 7, 38 Stat. 1053, as amended, (33 U.S.C. 471); Sec. 6(g)(1)(A) 80 Stat 937, (49 U.S.C. 1655(g)(1)(A); Sec. 12, 92 Stat. 1471, (46 U.S.C. 70034); 49 CFR 1.46 (c)(1) and (n)(4))
[CGD 75-082, 42 FR 51759, Sept. 29, 1977, as amended by CGD 77-028, 46 FR 49851, Oct. 8, 1981; CGD8 87-09, 53 FR 15555, May 2, 1988; USCG-2020-0304; 85 FR 58280, Sept. 18, 2020]
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,

Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





In connection with the Annual Report of Health Enhancement Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jeffery R. Richards, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date:  May 13, 2005

/s/ Jeffery R. Richards



Jeffery R. Richards

Chief Financial Officer







A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[RI 92-19]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Reclearance of a 
Revised Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget a request for reclearance of a revised information 
collection. RI 92-19, Application for Deferred or Postponed Retirement: 
Federal Employees' Retirement System (FERS), is used by separated 
employees to apply for either a deferred or a postponed FERS annuity 
benefit.
    Approximately 1,272 forms are completed annually. We estimate it 
takes approximately 60 minutes to complete the form. The annual 
estimated burden is 1,272 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 
(202) 606-8358, or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f525d4b5050525a467f504f5211585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cba6a9bfa4a4a6aeb28ba4bba6e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before July 
10, 2000.

ADDRESS: Send or deliver comments to--

John Crawford, Chief, FERS Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, 
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3313, 
Washington, DC 20415
and
Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT: Donna 
G. Lease, Team Leader, Forms Analysis and Design, (202) 606-0623

Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-14627 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
null

327.94394
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10626 Summary Calendar

AARON ANTHONY SHEPPARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus HERMAN SHAFFER, Doctor; VEACH, Officer; BRUCE A. LARSEN, Captain; MOON, Counsel Substitute II; WRIGHT, Counsel Substitute II; MORRISSON, Senior Counsel Substitute; QUINTANILLA, Captain, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:97-CV-61

- - - - - - - - - - November 25, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Aaron Anthony Sheppard, Texas state prisoner # 658333, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). We review the district court’s dismissal for abuse of discretion. Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). Sheppard complains of procedural defects in disclipinary hearings against him. Sheppard has not met the requiredNo. 97-10626 -2- preconditions to bring a section 1983 claim on these grounds. Edwards v. Balisok , 117 S. Ct. 1584, 1589 (1997); Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); Clarke v. Stadler , 121 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir. 1997). Since it did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Sheppard’s complaint, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. FELIZA RENTERIA,
Defendant

- Appellant. No. 23

- 1869 D.C. No. 3:20

- cr - 00309

- AJ B

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 10, 2024 ** Pasadena, California Before: R. NELSON, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges

. Feliza Renteria appeals the district court ’ s denial of h er motion for compassionate relief. R enteria pleaded guilty to knowingly importing heroin into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. She was sentenced to
seventy

- two months of imprisonment , to be followed by five years of supervised

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 12 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 23

- 1869 release. Approximately two years into her sentence, Renteria sought compassionate
release based on her end

- stage kidney disease and other health conditions . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review the denial of a motion for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Wright, 46 F.4th 938, 94 4 (9th Cir. 2022) . We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Renteria’s motion for compassionate release. The court acknowledged Renteria’s serious medical conditions but found that she had failed to prove extraordinary and compelling

reasons warrant ing a sentence reduction because her conditions were appropriately managed in prison, and the Bureau of Prisons could provide additional necessary care, including a kidney transplant, if Renteria met certain prerequisites for

treatment. 1 See 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(1)(A)(i). Particularly g iven there was no binding definition of extraordinary and compelling reasons for compassionate release at the time the district court decided Renteria’s motion, see U.S.S.G.
1B1.13 (2007) (amended 2023), the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying relief.
AFFIRMED.

1 The district court invited Ren t eria to file a subsequent motion for compassionate release if she is refused necessary care after becoming eligible in the future, the district court invited a subsequent motion for compassionate release.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley D. Tilden,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Bradley D. Tilden

Bradley D. Tilden
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4905 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4905

To amend the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 to authorize 
  a homeowner to recover treble damages from the homeowner's mortgage 
  escrow servicer for failure by the servicer to make timely payments 
   from the escrow account for homeowners insurance, taxes, or other 
                                charges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2000

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 to authorize 
  a homeowner to recover treble damages from the homeowner's mortgage 
  escrow servicer for failure by the servicer to make timely payments 
   from the escrow account for homeowners insurance, taxes, or other 
                                charges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeowners' Escrow Payments 
Assurance Act''.

SEC. 2. TREBLE DAMAGES FOR FAILURE TO MAKE PAYMENTS FROM ESCROW 
              ACCOUNT.

    Section 6(f) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 
(12 U.S.C. 2605(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking subparagraph (A) and 
        inserting the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(A)(i) except as provided in clause (ii), any 
                actual damages to the borrower as a result of the 
                failure; or
                    ``(ii) in the case of an action for a failure to 
                comply with the requirements of subsection (g), 3 times 
                any such actual damages; and''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (A) and 
        inserting the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(A)(i) except as provided in clause (ii), any 
                actual damages to each of the borrowers in the class as 
                a result of the failure; or
                    ``(ii) in the case of an action for a failure to 
                comply with the requirements of subsection (g), 3 times 
                any such actual damages; and''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                        National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Bone Marrow Transplantation for Breast Cancer.                    

*Date:*                         July 7, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 AM to 1:30 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                        To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                        National Cancer Institute, Grants Review Branch, 6116 Executive Blvd., 8th Floor, Room 8034, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                        William D. Merritt, Scientific Review Administrator, Grants Review Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8034, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9767.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support, 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Instutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: June 8, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-14966  Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-U
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP99-518-014] 

Take notice that on June 1, 2000, PG&E Gas Transmission, Northwest Corporation (PG&E GT-NW) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets with an effective date of June 1, 2000:

Tenth Revised Sheet No. 7

First Revised Sheet No. 7.01

First Revised Sheet No. 7C

Original Sheet No. 7D

PG&E GT-NW states that these sheets are being filed to reflect the implementation of four negotiated rate agreements.

PG&E GT-NW further states that a copy of this filing has been served on PG&E GT-NW's jurisdictional customers, and interested state regulatory agencies.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be  considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www/​ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

*Acting Secretary*.                    

[FR Doc. 00-14707  Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6271

GARY LEWIS MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. C. WILSON; BEATRICE TOMADAKES; SERGEANT

MOSELY; JOHN SALDI; ANDREW A. JACKSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-98-844-5-H)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Lewis Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary Lewis Miller appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Miller v. Wilson, No. CA-98-844-5-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5251 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5251

 To provide for Medicare payment for medically unsupervised certified 
 registered nurse anesthetists at the same level as nurse anesthetists 
    who are medically supervised if the Medicare regulations permit 
certified registered nurse anesthetists to provide anesthesia services 
     in hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers without medical 
                              supervision.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2000

  Mr. Burr of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for Medicare payment for medically unsupervised certified 
 registered nurse anesthetists at the same level as nurse anesthetists 
    who are medically supervised if the Medicare regulations permit 
certified registered nurse anesthetists to provide anesthesia services 
     in hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers without medical 
                              supervision.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF INCENTIVE TO INCREASE MEDICARE PAYMENT LEVEL 
              FOR UNSUPERVISED CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETISTS.

    If the Secretary of Health and Human Services changes medicare 
regulations under title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit 
certified registered nurse anesthetists to furnish anesthesia services 
in hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers without medical 
supervision, then, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
level of payment for anesthesia services furnished by a certified 
registered nurse anesthetist who is not medically supervised in such a 
hospital or center shall be the same as the level of payment for such 
services furnished by the anesthetist in such a facility when the 
anesthetist is medically supervised.
                                 <all>
```