alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5354 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5354

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7 Commercial Street in Newport, Rhode Island, as the ``Bruce F. 
                     Cotta Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2000

 Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7 Commercial Street in Newport, Rhode Island, as the ``Bruce F. 
                     Cotta Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRUCE F. COTTA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7 Commercial Street in Newport, Rhode Island, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Bruce F. Cotta Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Bruce F. 
Cotta Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
II

Calendar No. 105

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 510

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 5, 1999

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to John

R. and Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land so as to correct an error in the

patent issued to their predecessors in interest.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 510 PCS

1 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF LOWE FAMILY PROPERTY.

2 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Subject to valid existing rights,

3 the Secretary of the Interior is directed to issue, without

4 consideration, a quitclaim deed to John R. and Margaret

5 J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, to the land de6 scribed in subsection (b): Provided, That all minerals un7 derlying such land are hereby reserved to the United

8 States.

9 (b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land referred to in

10 subsection (a) is the approximately 40-acre parcel located

in the SW1⁄4SE1 11 ⁄4 of Section 11, Township 51 North,

12 Range 96 West, 6th Principal Meridian, Wyoming.

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 105

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 510

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer

cessors in interest.an error in the patent issued to their predeCounty, Wyoming, certain land so as to correctto John R. and Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn

MAY 5, 1999

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
#### MARGARET HUNTER, Appellant, *v.*THE AMERICAN POPULAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

*Right to open and close case.*

Where, in an action upon a life insurance policy, a copy of which is set forth in the complaint, the answer “ admits each and every allegation in the complaint contained,'except that they deny that the paper marked ‘ A,’ annexed to the complaint, is a full and complete copy of the policy issued by them: ” *Held,*that the answer in substance and effect denied the making of the contract set up in the complaint, and that plaintiff was entitled to open and close the case.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

*795
      *Matthew*Hale, for the appellant.

*George Bliss,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
§ 966.2 Scope of rules. ( a ) The rules in this part apply to any petition filed by a former postal employee: ( 1 ) To challenge the Postal Service's determination that he or she is liable to the Postal Service for a debt incurred in connection with his or her Postal Service employment, that the Postal Service intends to collect by administrative offset pursuant to the authority of 31 U.S.C. 3716 and in accordance with the regulations contained in the Employee and Labor Relations Manual, sections 470 and 480; and/or
( 2 ) To challenge the administrative offset schedule proposed by the Postal Service for collecting any such debt.
( b ) The regulations in this part are consistent with the provisions of the Federal Claims Collection Standards pertaining to administrative offset.
[77 FR 65104, Oct. 25, 2012]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF ASIAINFO HOLDINGS, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Name under which            State or other jurisdiction
             Subsidiary                   the subsidiary does business           of incorporation
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- ---------------------------
<S>                                   <C>                                   <C>
AsiaInfo H.K. Limited                 AsiaInfo HK                           Hong Kong
AsiaInfo (H.K.) Systems Co. Limited   AsiaInfo HK                           Hong Kong
AsiaInfo Technologies (Chengdu), Inc. AsiaInfo Chengdu                      People's Republic of China
AsiaInfo Technologies (China), Inc.   AsiaInfo Technologies                 People's Republic of China
Bonson Information Technology         Bonson Information Technology Limited Cayman Islands
Holdings Limited
Bonson Information Technology         Bonson Information Technology Limited British Virgin Islands
Limited
Guangdong Wangying Information        Wangying                              People's Republic of China
Technology Co. Ltd.
AsiaInfo Management Software, Inc.    AsiaInfo Management Software          People's Republic of China
Marsec Holdings, Inc.                 Marsec                                Cayman Islands
Marsec System, Inc.                   Marsec                                People's Republic of China
</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4910

To amend title 39, United States Code, to make nonmailable any mail

matter which bears on its face or on its envelope or outside cover

or wrapper the Social Security account number of any individual.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 2000

Mr. EHLERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To amend title 39, United States Code, to make nonmailable

any mail matter which bears on its face or on its envelope or outside cover or wrapper the Social Security

account number of any individual.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NONMAILABILITY OF MAIL MATTER BEARING

4 OR SHOWING THE SOCIAL SECURITY AC5 COUNT NUMBER OF ANY INDIVIDUAL.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3001 of title 39, United

7 States Code, is amended by redesignating subsections (m)
2

•HR 4910 IH

1 and (n) as subsections (n) and (o), respectively, and by

2 inserting after subsection (l) the following:

3 ‘‘(m)(1) Any matter otherwise legally acceptable in

4 the mails which is described in paragraph (2) is non5 mailable matter, shall not be carried or delivered by mail,

6 and shall be disposed of as the Postal Service directs.

7 ‘‘(2) Matter described in this paragraph is any matter

8 that bears on its face or on its envelope or outside cover

9 or wrapper the social security account number of any indi10 vidual (or through the envelope or outside cover or wrap11 per of which the social security account number of any

12 individual is visible).’’.

13 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by this

14 section shall apply with respect to matter mailed after the

15 90th day following the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 964.21 Official record.

The transcript of testimony together with all pleadings, orders, exhibits, briefs, and other documents filed in the proceeding constitute the official record of the proceeding.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

d0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138119(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138119 COA: 288457 Cheboygan CC: 00-002240-FC BOBBY LURAY REDDELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
#### § 101-25.113 [Reserved]
Hillsborough

No. 78-130

#### Christine Richards, by her Mother and next Friend, Doris Richards v. Larry Leppard

September 27, 1978

*Craig, Wenners, Craig & McDowell,*of Manchester *(Vincent A. Wenners, Jr.*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Wadleigh, Starr, Peters, Dunn & Kohls,*of Manchester *(James S. Yakovakis*orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum

This case arose when a dog owned by Marshall Nye bit Christine Ann Richards on August 22, 1976. Marshall Nye was a lessee of a home at Shell Camp Lake in the town of Gilmanton, New Hampshire. The owner of the home was the defendant, Larry Leppard of Concord.

By writ dated March 28, 1977, the plaintiff commenced a civil action against Larry Leppard, the lessor, under RSA 466:19 alleging that Larry Leppard was in “possession and control” of the dog in question. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment with his attached affidavit reciting that he was not the owner or keeper of the dog, nor was he in possession or control of the dog. On September 28, 1977, the court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff excepted to this ruling. On September 30, 1977, the plaintiff moved to amend the declaration in her writ, to which the defendant filed a motion to dismiss and plea in abatement. At a hearing on November 22,1977, the plaintiff waived her motion to amend the declaration in the writ.

By writ dated November 30,1977, the plaintiff commenced a new action against Larry Leppard, claiming general negligence on his part *667in that he knew or should have known that the dog would roam and be potentially dangerous. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss, which the court granted. The plaintiff excepted to this ruling. All questions of law were transferred by *Flynn,*J.

Although RSA 466:19 makes liable for damages one “who owns or keeps [a] . . . dog, or has it in possession” if it causes injury to another, we find no duty in this case breached by the lessor and therefore no cause of action lies. *See Libbey v. Hampton Water Works Company, Inc., 118*N.H. 500, 389 A.2d 434 (1978).

*Exceptions overruled.*
```

[Federal Register: September 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 187)]
[Notices]               
[Page 59781]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28se10-125]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7187]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Imagining the Past in France, 1250-1500''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Imagining the Past in France, 1250-1500,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the J. Paul Getty 
Museum, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about November 16, 2010, until on 
or about February 6, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice 
of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 22, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-24300 Filed 9-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip DeZwirek, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Phillip DeZwirek                             
|Phillip DeZwirek                                 
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 10, 2009



32
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of VoIP, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for
the year ended  December  31,  2004 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David Sasnett, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                                /s/ David Sasnett
                                ---------------------------
                                David Sasnett
                                Chief Financial Officer

November 23, 2005
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 8138 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 11 2

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Modification 15 $ 1,275.0

0 $0 $ 1,275.00 

### 5 $ 6,375.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in complianc e:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 6,375



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Cos ts:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to expl ain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD ha ve a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific require ments for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
§ 52.56 Conduct of hearing. ( a ) The Chair or the Chair's designee shall conduct a hearing so as to ensure a full and fair presentation of the evidence.
( b ) The hearing is not limited by legal rules of evidence, but reasonable standards of competency, relevancy, and materiality are observed for the receipt and consideration of evidence.
( c ) All testimony shall be given under oath or affirmation.
GAO/AIMD-00-249R 82nd Airborne Division Association, Incorporated

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

Accounting and Information

Management Division

B-285457

June 30, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the 82nd Airborne Division Association, Incorporated, for 1997 and 1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the 82nd

Airborne Division Association, Incorporated, a federally chartered corporation, for the years

ended December 31, 1997 and 1998. The corporation was established to promote fellowship

among current and former troopers throughout the United States.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the corporation’s

income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditor’s report and the corporation’s financial statements to the Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with the

financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we reviewed the

corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes, performed certain analytical

procedures related to information presented in the financial statements, reviewed the

auditor’s report, and made inquiries to corporation officials or the auditor as we deemed

necessary. We did not review the auditor’s working papers. Our review disclosed no

reportable instances of noncompliance.
B-285457

GAO/AIMD-00-249R 82nd Page 2 Airborne Division Association, Incorporated

The audit report included the auditor’s opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with generally

accepted accounting principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

David L. Clark

Director, Audit Oversight and Liaison

Enclosure

(911988)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5188 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5188

     To amend the Missing Children's Assistance Act to extend the 
 applicability of such Act to individuals determined to have a mental 
                  capacity less than 18 years of age.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2000

 Mrs. Thurman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Missing Children's Assistance Act to extend the 
 applicability of such Act to individuals determined to have a mental 
                  capacity less than 18 years of age.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Audrey Nerenberg Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 403(1) of the Missing Children's Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
5772(1)) is amended by inserting ``(or whose mental capacity is less 
than 18 years of age as determined by an appropriate medical 
authority)'' after ``age''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect on 
the 1st day of the 1st fiscal year beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```