alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: October 7, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AERO MICRONESIA 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0468 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AERO MICRONESIA 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0469 

AMENDED HEARING NOTICE 

t ~ :'; 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on December 1, 2 and 3, 2014, inclusive, in the U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii 

300 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, Hawaii 968501

• The hearing will commence at 0730 

a.m. on December 1, 2014. The schedule for December 2 and 3, 2014 will be determined 

on December 1, 2014. 

Counsel may present the cases in any sequence them deem appropriate.!. 

,--~~:)::::~·-/' (-·~r··--c,! J; " ('-"" 1 ......... ,,r ~t,.. n~t-v··- '··· . (, __ ,.>________ - ... :· u'"-·~-.J , \ 

.,,"' 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 As of the date of this notice a courtroom has not been assigned. Parties should check the Court Calendar 

the dayofthe hearing for the exact courtroom. The parties may also check with the Clerk's Office. 
CORRECTED 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

David M. Kirstein and Lyndsey M. Grunewald 

Kirstein & Young, PLLC, Respondent's Counsel 

1750 K Street, N.W., Suite 200 

Washington, DC 20006 

TEL: 202-331-3348 

FAX: 202-331-3933 

Michael R. Quinn, President 

Aero Micronesia, Inc. dba Asia Pacific Airlines, Inc., Respondent 

156 Diablo Road, Suite 203 

Danville, CA 94526 

TEL: 925-362-4430 · 

FAX: 925-362-4432 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7 

PO Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS NOS. F AA-20 12-0468 

& FAA-2012-0469 

(Civil Penalty Actions) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
#### § 183.570 Fuel filters and strainers: Installation.

Each fuel filter and strainer must be supported on the engine or boat structure independent from its fuel line connections, unless the fuel filter or strainer is inside a fuel tank.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0404

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TYLIN JAMES WEBER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 30, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 21 2022

11/21/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0404
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Eddie Anthony Patterson, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00046

- CV v.

T.V. Channel 25 Broadcast Station and Its Reporter on March 29, 2010; 1909 S New Road, Waco, Texas 76711, Appellee s Appeal from the 170th District Court of McLennan County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2015

- 905

- 4 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Eddie Anthony Patterson, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 2 7 , 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.25-5 Obstruction lights. ( a ) The obstruction lights shall be white lights as prescribed in Subpart 67.05 of this part and shall be of sufficient candlepower as to be visible at a distance of at least three nautical miles 90 percent of the nights of the year. The lights shall be displayed not less than 20 feet above mean high water, but not at a height greater than that specified in § 67.05-1(f), except that on Class “B” structures which are required to be marked by only one light, that light may be displayed not less than 10 feet above mean high water if the structural features preclude mounting the light within the range of heights otherwise specified in this section.
( b ) The District Commander may waive the requirement for obstruction lights on Class “B” structures if there is no hazard to navigation by so doing.
[CGFR 58-34, 23 FR 7701, Oct. 4, 1958, as amended by CGFR 62-32, 27 FR 10101, Oct. 13, 1962]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-1-000]


TransEnergie U.S., Ltd.; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 5, 2000.
    On October 1, 1999, TransEnergie U.S., Ltd. (TransEnergie) filed 
with the Commission a petition for an order accepting a tariff offering 
non-discriminatory transmission service over a 26-mile undersea high-
voltage, bi-directional, direct current cable it proposes to build 
underneath the Long Island Sound. TransEnergie also requested certain 
waivers and authorizations. In particular, TransEnergie requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by the 
TransEnergie. On June 1, 2000, the Commission issued an Order Approving 
Proposal Subject To Conditions (Order), in the above-docketed 
proceedings.
    The Commission's June 1, 2000 Order granted TransEnergie's request 
for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (C), (D), and (E):
    (C) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by TransEnergie 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, TransEnergie is hereby authorized to 
issue securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of TransEnergie, compatible with 
the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (E) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of 
TransEnergie's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * 
* *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 3, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. This issuance may also be viewed on the 
Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 
for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14632 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 110.134 Portland Harbor, Maine. ( a ) *The anchorage grounds* — ( 1 ) *Anchorage A (general).* Beginning at latitude 43°39′37′′ N, longitude 070°14′35′′ W; thence approximately 090° for 1550 yards to Fort Gorges Island Ledge Buoy 4; thence 350° for 300 yards; thence 025° for 780 yards; thence 303° for 750 yards; thence 254° for 560 yards; thence 186° for 750 yards and thence to the point of beginning.
( 2 ) *Anchorage B (general—primarily intended for deep draft vessels).* Beginning at Fort Gorges Island Ledge Buoy 4; thence 062° to Little Diamond Island; thence along the southwestern shore to the pier on the southern end of Little Diamond Island; 133° for 1200 yards; 270° to House Island Light; thence along the western shore of House Island to Fort Scammel Point Light; thence 325° for 1700 yards to the point of beginning.
( 3 ) *Anchorage C.* Bounded on the northwest by House Island; on the north by a line running 90° from House Island Light to Peak Island; on the east by the western shore of Peak Island, by a line running 198° from the westernmost point on Peak Island to Cushing Island, and by the shore of Cushing Island to its westernmost point; and on the southwest by a line running from the westernmost point on Cushing Island to Fort Scammel Point Light.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Anchorage B is intended for general purposes, but especially for use by oil tankers and other large deep-draft ships entering harbor at night and intending to proceed to the dock allotted at daylight the following morning or as soon as practicable. This area is also to be used for quarantine anchorage. Vessels must be so anchored in this area as to leave at all times an open usable channel at least 100 feet wide for passage of ferry and other boats between Portland, Peak Island, and Bay Points. Any vessels anchored in this area shall be ready to move on short notice when ordered to do so by the Captain of the Port.
( 2 ) Anchorage C is intended for use only by small vessels and for temporary anchorage.
[CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended by CGD 83-1R, 48 FR 56578, Dec. 22, 1983. Redesignated by CGD-01-02-027, 67 FR 68518, Nov. 12, 2002]
#### EDWARD VAN RANST, Respondent, *v.*THE NEW YORK COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SURGEONS, Appellant.

*Injunction*— *laches.*

The charter of the defendant (chap. 269 of 1857, as amended by chap. 346 of 1862), authorized the board of trustees to declare vacant the place of any trustee who should refuse or neglect to attend six regular meetings. At a meeting of the board held August 5th, 1863, a resolution was passed declaring the place . of the plaintiff vacant, for not attending six regular meetings. He had then been absent from three successive meetings, and from that time until May 13th, 1874, he never attended a meeting or claimed to act as a trustee. This suit was commenced to restrain the defendant from preventing him from acting as such trustee, and from filling his place in the board. *Held,*that he had slept too long on his rights, if he had any, to justify the granting of a temporary injunction.

Appeal from an order made at the Special Term, continuing a temporary injunction.

*John J. Macklin,*for the appellant.

*Wm. H. Arnoux,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Daniels, J., concurred.

*621Brady, J.,

concurred in the result, holding that the plaintiff’s remedy was by *quo wa/rrcmto.*

Order reversed and motion denied, with ten dollars costs of this appeal besides disbursements, and ten dollars costs of opposing the motion below.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CR-20505-GAYLES/TORRES

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs.

KEVIN ABARCA and 

JORGE PEREZ-DECESPEDES, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ Report 

and Recommendation on Daubert Motion (the “Report”). [ECF No. 228]. On December 22, 2023, 

Defendant Kevin Abarca (“Defendant”) filed his Motion in Limine (the “Motion”). [ECF No. 189]. 

The United States of America (the “Government”) filed its Response in Opposition to the 

Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Ballistics Testimony on January 17, 2024. [ECF No. 201]. On 

January 31, 2024, the Motion was referred to Judge Torres for a report and recommendation. [ECF 

No. 209]. Subsequently, on March 5, 2024, an evidentiary hearing on the Motion was held. [ECF No. 

227]. Judge Torres’ Report recommends that the Court grant, in part, and deny, in part, Defendant’s 

Motion. [ECF No. 228]. Neither party filed objections. 

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which 

objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings 

that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see 

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific 

Case 1:22-cr-20505-DPG Document 247 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2024 Page 1 of 2
2

objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint 

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 

208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). 

This Court finds no clear error with Judge Torres’ well-reasoned analysis and agrees that 

the Motion must be granted, in part, and denied, in part.

Accordingly, after careful consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’ Report and Recommendation on Daubert 

Motion, [ECF No. 228], is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and incorporated into 

this Order by reference; and

(2) Defendant Kevin Abarca’s Motion in Limine, [ECF No. 189], is GRANTED, in 

part, and DENIED, in part, as follows:

a. DENIED as to Defendant’s Motion for exclusion of Tyler Brown’s testimony; 

and

b. GRANTED as to limiting Tyler Brown’s testimony to the directives of the 

Department of Justice’s Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports for the 

Forensic Firearms/Toolmarks disciplines.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 21st day of March, 2024. 

________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-20505-DPG Document 247 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2024 Page 2 of 2
Petition for Reconsideration and Clarification has been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to this petition must be filed by February 7, 2000. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.                    Start Printed Page 3452

*Subject:*                    Amendment of the Amateur Service Rules to Provide for Greater Use of Spread Spectrum Communications Technologies (WT Docket No. 97-12, RM-8737).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                    1.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-1463 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### QUALITY EGG PRODUCTS, Inc., and Seymour M. Levin, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 13521.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 21, 1958.

Gertler & Frank, Miami Beach, Fla., for appellants.

Fred Elledge, Jr., and Andrew M. Gant, Jr., U. S. Attys., Nashville, Tenn., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, MILLER, Circuit Judge, and THORNTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The United States by Criminal Information charged appellants with unlawfully introducing into interstate commerce a number of cans containing frozen whole eggs which were adulterated within the meaning of 21 U.S.C.A. § 342 (a) (3), in violation of the provisions of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 331 and 333. Following a trial before the District Judge, a trial by jury having been waived, the appellants were found guilty. Appellant Levin received a fine of $750.

Whether the eggs were adulterated within the meaning of the statute was a factual issue, depending to a large extent upon conclusions to be drawn from the conditions under which they were transported and the condition of the eggs upon their arrival at their destination, about which there was some dispute. Appellants contend that the evidence did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt this factual issue decided against them.

Viewing the evidence with inferences reasonably and justifiably to be drawn therefrom, most favorable to the Government, we are of the opinion that the *470finding of the District Judge is supported by substantial and competent evidence. Battjes v. United States, 6 Cir., 172 F.2d 1, 4-5 and, accordingly,

It is ordered that the judgment be affirmed.
Page 1 of 1

BMD Analysis (Cmax)

Kan Shao

September 5, 2013

Becci et al 1982, Table 5, Sternabrae (missing), Litter size

Dose, Cmax (mg/L) N Effect

0 24 1

202.4 22 0

641.1 23 4

2049.6 22 17

BMD Estimation Results

Model P-Value AIC BMD 

(BMR=10%)

BMDL

(BMR=10%) 

BMD

(BMR=5%)

BMDL 

(BMR=5%)

Gamma 0.29 60.88 563.27 333.82 420.35 209.39

Logistic 0.42 59.93 653.38 475.06 424.13 282.05

LogLogistic 0.29 60.86 558.66 344.90 421.06 228.25

LogProbit 0.32 60.59 552.53 352.30 436.81 252.13

Multistage 0.53 59.17 548.73 315.68 382.87 168.76

Probit 0.45 59.72 594.26 439.12 380.16 256.35

Weibull 0.26 61.16 566.77 319.70 399.58 190.16

Quantal-Linear 0.04 66.13 220.23 153.18 107.22 74.57

Note: Quantal-Linear cannot fit properly. Multistage model (degree 2) is the best fitted model and 

should be selected.

Becci et al 1982, Table 5, Vertebrae (Incomplete ossification), Litter size

Dose, Cmax (mg/L) N Effect

0 24 12

202.4 22 11

641.1 23 14

2049.6 22 18

BMD Estimation Results

Model P-Value AIC BMD 

(BMR=10%)

BMDL

(BMR=10%) 

BMD

(BMR=5%)

BMDL 

(BMR=5%)

Gamma 0.84 121.46 347.23 117.60 204.7 57.25

Logistic 0.97 119.49 271.17 170.45 135.45 85.27

LogLogistic 0.87 121.45 361.44 65.84 227.21 31.19

LogProbit 0.99 119.43 393.99 210.39 273.97 146.30

Multistage 0.80 121.49 302.83 117.31 153.46 57.11

Probit 0.97 119.49 280.19 182.93 139.97 91.50

Weibull 0.83 121.47 333.97 117.52 188.83 57.21

Quantal-Linear 0.94 119.55 212.68 116.58 103.54 56.75

Note: LogProbit Model is the best fitted model, but the BMDLs exceed the range of 3-fold. So, the 

lowest BMDL should be selected.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-557-805]


Extruded Rubber Thread From Malaysia: Notice of Extension of Time 
Limits for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is extending the time limits of the 
preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review of 
extruded rubber thread from Malaysia. The review covers three 
producers/exporters of the subject merchandise to the United States. 
The period of review is October 1, 1998, through September 30, 1999.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 14, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shawn Thompson at (202) 482-1776, or 
Irina Itkin at (202) 482-0656, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because it is not practicable to complete 
this administrative review within the time limits mandated by section 
751(a)(3)(A) of Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round 
Agreements Act, the Department is extending the time limit for 
completion of the preliminary results. In this review, the respondents 
will not have their audited financial statements ready until after the 
scheduled date for the preliminary results. Because the Department 
intends to incorporate the auditors' adjustments into its calculations, 
we have extended the deadline until October 30, 2000.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(3)(A)) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    Dated: June 8, 2000.
Richard W. Moreland,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-15052 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.30-10 Sound signals. ( a ) The owner of a Class “C” structure shall install a sound signal if: ( 1 ) The structure is erected on or adjacent to the edge of a: ( i ) Navigable channel;
( ii ) Fairways; or
( iii ) Line of demarcation; and
( 2 ) The District Commander decides it is necessary for the safety of marine commerce.
( b ) Sound signals required by paragraph (a) of this section must have rated range of at least one-half mile, unless the District Commander prescribes a greater rated range, not to exceed 2 miles.
( c ) The owner of the structure shall operate the sound signal required by paragraph (a) of this section whenever the visibility in any direction is less than 3 miles, unless the District Commander establishes a greater or lesser distance of visibility, not to exceed 5 miles.
( d ) Class “C” structures may have sound signals if: ( 1 ) Authorized by the District Commander under the provisions of Subpart 66.01 of this subchapter; and
( 2 ) The sound signal meets the requirements of § 67.10-1 (a) and (b).
[CGD 72-74R, 37 FR 13513, July 8, 1972]
§ 3010.303 Hearing format. ( a ) In any case noticed for a proceeding to be determined on the record, the Commission or the presiding officer, if one has been appointed, may determine whether to hold a public hearing, or to hold a hearing by written submission of material only. A public hearing may be held if a hearing is requested by any party to the proceeding or if the Commission determines that a hearing is in the public interest. Generally, public hearings provide an opportunity for oral cross-examination of witnesses whereas hearings held by written submission of material only do not.
( b ) Once established, requests to change the hearing format may be proposed by motion, or by the Commission's or presiding officer's own motion.
( c ) Only representatives of the Commission, parties that have intervened in a proceeding, or persons intending to intervene prior to the deadline for notices of intervention may participate in a public hearing. However, public hearings are generally open to the public for observation. Public hearings may be closed to the public for good cause, or when confidential material is being presented.