alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11846-11847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4814]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

24th Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 Plenary: 
AIS and MET Data Link Services

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 Plenary: 
AIS and MET Data Link Services meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 Plenary: AIS and 
MET Data Link Services.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 21-25, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Honeywell Aerospace, Phoenix 
(DV), 21111 North 19th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85027-2704.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a RTCA Special Committee 206: EUROCAE WG 76 
Plenary: AIS and MET Data Link Services meeting. The agenda will 
include:

March 21--Monday

     9 a.m.--Opening Plenary.
      Chairmen's remarks and Host's comments.
      Introductions.
      Approval of previous meeting minutes.
      Review and approve meeting agenda.
      Schedule for this week.
      Action Item Review.
      Working Group 1, Work Plan--WG1 Chairmen.
      Working Group 2, Work Plan--WG2 Chairmen.
      Working Group 3, Recommendations--WG3 Chairmen.
      Current status and deliverables of SESAR JU Project 
08.03.03 (Identify and Develop Aeronautical (and Meteorological) ATM 
Information Services)--Roger Li.
     1 p.m.--WG1, WG2, and WG3 Meetings.

[[Page 11847]]

March 22-24, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday

     9 a.m.--WG1, WG2, and WG3 Meetings.

March 25--Friday

     9 a.m.--WG1, WG2, and WG3 Meetings.
     10 a.m.--Plenary Session.
      Working Group Reports.
      Action Item Review.
      Other Business.
      Meeting plans and dates.
     12 p.m.--Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 25, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-4814 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
§ 962.20 Initial decision. ( a ) After the conclusion of the hearing, and the receipt of briefs, if any, from the parties, the Presiding Officer shall issue a written initial decision, including his or her findings and determinations. Such decision shall include the findings of fact and conclusions of law which the Presiding Officer relied upon in determining whether the Respondent is liable under 31 U.S.C. 3802, and, if liability is found, shall set forth the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The Presiding Officer shall promptly send to each party a copy of his or her initial decision, and a statement describing the right of any person determined to be liable under 31 U.S.C. 3802, to appeal, in accordance with § 962.21, the decision of the Presiding Officer to the Judicial Officer.
( c ) Unless the Respondent appeals the Presiding Officer's initial decision, such decision, including the findings and determinations, is final.
Hillsborough

No. 7943

#### Richard Garthe v. Michael Mills, d/b/a Real Estate Plus

April 25, 1978

*New Hampshire Legal Assistance, Inc.,*of Nashua *(Jeffry A. Schapira*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Holland & Aivalikles,*of Nashua *(William M. Ladd*orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

This is an appeal from a finding of contempt entered against the defendant arising out of his failure to comply with an *ex parte*order of the court to allow the plaintiff to retrieve personal property from defendant’s apartment building. Defendant asserts that the superior court is without jurisdiction to issue an *ex parte*order allowing plaintiff to reclaim his personal property inasmuch as such an order circumvents the normal requirements of notice and hearing provided by the replevin statute. RSA ch. 536-A. *Flynn,*J., transferred the defendant’s exception to the contempt order.

Although we look askance at such *ex parte*orders, the central issue before us is factually similar to the case of *Nottingham v. Cedar Waters, Inc.,*118 N.H. 282, 385 A.2d 851 (1978), decided this day. Because the court apparently entered a criminal contempt penalty, a $300 fine (not clearly payable to the complainant), following an indirect civil contempt proceeding, the court’s order is vacated and remanded for disposition in accordance with the principles stated in *Nottingham v. Cedar Waters, Inc. supra.*

*Exception sustained; remanded.*
#### § 1.2 Delegation of authority.

Except for powers, duties, or obligations specifically vested in the Governors by law, the Board may delegate its authority to the Postmaster General under such terms, conditions, and limitations, including the power of redelegation, as it finds desirable. The bylaws of the Board are the framework of the system through which the Board monitors the exercise of the authority it has delegated, measures progress toward the goals it has set, and shapes the policies to guide the future development of the Postal Service. Delegations of authority do not relieve the Board of full responsibility for carrying out its duties and functions, and are revocable by the Governors in their exclusive judgment.
Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 1 of 10

Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 2 of 10

Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 3 of 10

Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 4 of 10

Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 5 of 10

Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 6 of 10

Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 7 of 10

Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 8 of 10

Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 9 of 10

Case 1:22-cr-20487-BB   Document 30   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/18/2023   Page 10 of 10
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2022

No. 04-22-00168-CV

IN THE MATTER OF J. E. R-P,

From the County Court At Law No 1, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021JV1000086L1

Honorable Hugo Martinez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from an order waiving jurisdiction of the juvenile court and 

transferring the juvenile to criminal district court. The court reporter has filed a notification of 

late record, requesting an extension to April 29, 2022. We GRANT the court reporter an 

extension and ORDER the reporter’s record to be filed by April 29, 2022. 

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Statement of Ms. Karen Magliano Regarding Public Notice for the 

State Implementation Plan Revision for Federal Nitrogen Dioxide Standard 

Infrastructure Requirements 

I, Karen Magliano, Chief of the Air Resources Board Air Quality Data Branch, have 

personal knowledge of the following facts: 

The Air Resources Board posted on October 15, 2012, a link to the public hearing 

notice (Attachment A) for the State Implementation Plan Revision for Federal Nitrogen 

Dioxide Standard Infrastructure Requirements at: 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/planarea/noticesworkshops.htm 

ARB sent email notifications (Attachment B) on October 15, 2012, announcing the 

public hearing on State Implementation Plan Revision for Federal Nitrogen Dioxide 

Standard Infrastructure Requirements and provided the link to the Nitrogen Dioxide 

Infrastructure SIP document at: 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/sip.htm 

The emails were sent to members subscribed to the following listservs: the "sip" listserv 

(State Implementation Plan listserv- 3,943 subscribers), the "board" listserv (Board 

Meetings and Publ'ic Meeting Notice listserv- 4763 subscribers), and the "desig" 

listserv (Area Designation listserv- 3,144 subscribers). 

ARB posted the agenda for its November 15, 2012, Board Meeting (Attachment C) that 

included the Public Hearing to Consider Approval of the Proposed State Implementation 

Plan Revision for Federal Lead Standard Infrastructure Requirements at: 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/board/ma/2012/ma111512.htm 

) 

1 I . '/:;]- c I/ • • - -"-.Jo< 

·~ ~ · ~1 Jl-~-·· ·CGvo l . (/ . -

~ -~ ' . "--- j' / . . 

Karen Magl1ano, Ch1ef 

Air Quality Data Branch 

Date: December 12, 2012
-cr-06240-WPD Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/24/2001 P
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.,

 Defendant.

Case No. 0:22-CV-61842-AHS

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES

Defendant’s Notice of Supplemental Authorities does not satisfy Local Rule 7.8—neither 

decision is “pertinent or significant” to the matter before this Court:

Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. WP Company LLC, 2023 WL 1765193 (D.D.C. Feb. 

3, 2023) – an opinion applying that Circuit’s restrictive application of Sullivan to a complaint 

regarding two articles in the Washington Post unrelated to this case. The first article hyperlinked 

the Mueller report while providing its take on his findings, and the second article was deemed by 

that Court to be “pure opinion” in its rhetoric regarding foreign interference in the 2020 election. 

The case was dismissed without prejudice to allow amended allegations of malice.

Trump v. Clinton, --- F.Supp.3d ---, 2023 WL 333699 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 19, 2023) – a decision 

regarding a dismissed RICO complaint where the opinion mentioned this case but added, “To be 

clear, the sanction in this case is not imposed against Mr. Trump for the ... CNN litigation. Those 

cases are before other judges who will make their own determinations.” (at *19)

Case 0:22-cv-61842-AHS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

The above rulings do not apply to this case as they are from non-precedential disputes, in 

different jurisdictions, and with completely different causes of action.

Dated: February 13, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Lindsey Halligan .

Lindsey Halligan

Florida Bar No. 109481

511 SE 5th Avenue

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: (720) 435-2870

Email: lindseyhalligan@outlook.com

/s/ James M. Trusty .

James M. Trusty

Pro Hac Vice

Ifrah Law PLLC

1717 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Suite 650

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: (202) 524-4176

Email: jtrusty@ifrahlaw.com

Attorneys for President Donald J. Trump

Case 0:22-cv-61842-AHS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 154.545 Discharge containment equipment. ( a ) Each facility must have ready access to enough containment material and equipment to contain any oil or hazardous material discharged on the water from operations at that facility.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, “access” may be by direct ownership, joint ownership, cooperative venture, or contractual agreement.
( c ) Each facility must establish time limits, subject to approval by the COTP, for deployment of the containment material and equipment required by paragraph (a) of this section considering: ( 1 ) Oil or hazardous material handling rates;
( 2 ) Oil or hazardous material capacity susceptible to being spilled;
( 3 ) Frequency of facility operations;
( 4 ) Tidal and current conditions;
( 5 ) Facility age and configuration; and
( 6 ) Past record of discharges.
( d ) The COTP may require a facility to surround each vessel conducting an oil or hazardous material transfer operation with containment material before commencing a transfer operation if— ( 1 ) The environmental sensitivity of the area requires the added protection;
( 2 ) The products transferred at the facility pose a significant threat to the environment;
( 3 ) The past record of discharges at the facility is poor; or
( 4 ) The size or complexity of the transfer operation poses a significant potential for a discharge of oil or hazardous material; and
( 5 ) The use of vessel containment provides the only practical means to reduce the extent of environmental damage.
( e ) Equipment and procedures maintained to satisfy the provisions of this chapter may be utilized in the planning requirements of subpart F and subpart H of this part.
[CGD 75-124, 45 FR 7172, Jan. 31, 1980, as amended by CGD 86-034, 55 FR 36253, Sept. 4, 1990; CGD 93-056, 61 FR 41460, Aug. 8, 1996; USCG-1999-5149, 65 FR 40825, June 30, 2000]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 29, 2015

d0422

Order 

Clerk

April 29, 2015

150686

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150686

COA: 323787

Kalamazoo CC: 2014-000115-FH

ANTWON DONTAE ROLLAND, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.10.5

                             SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                ALBERTSON'S, INC. 2000 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

     WHEREAS, the Albertson's, Inc. 2000 Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan")
was established effective January 1, 2000, and has previously been amended;

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Albertson's, Inc. has delegated the
authority to amend the Plan to its Management Development/Compensation
Committee;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendments to the Plan are hereby adopted
effective as of the adoption date of this Amendment (unless another effective
date is expressly specified):

     1. A new Section 6.10 is hereby added to the Plan, immediately following
Section 6.9, to read as follows:

               6.10 Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, each
          Participant shall have the right to elect, prior to May 22, 2006, in
          accordance with procedures established under the Plan, to receive a
          lump sum in cash (payable from an applicable trust or from general
          corporate assets) such Participant's vested account balance under such
          Plan as of the date of the distribution, payable as soon as
          practicable on or after (but no later than 30 days after) January 1,
          2007, or, if later, the effective date of a Change in Control
          ("Special Election Lump Sum"), provided that such election shall not
          prevent the payment or commencement of a Participant's account balance
          under the Plan on a scheduled distribution date that occurs prior to
          the payment of any such Special Election Lump Sum.

     2. A new Section 9.3 shall be added, immediately following Section 9.2, to
read as follows:

               9.3 It is intended that the Plan shall be operated in good faith
          compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") and
          may be amended by the Board, the Committee or their duly authorized
          delegates at any time to the extent determined necessary or desirable,
          at their discretion, in light of Code Section 409A, without regard to
          any restrictions on the ability to amend the Plan under any other
          provision of the Plan.

<PAGE>

     3. Except as provided herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.

     EXECUTED this 28th day of April, 2006.

                                        ALBERTSON'S, INC.


                                        By: /s/ John R. Sims
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Its: Executive Vice President & General
                                             Counsel


                                       2
Docket ID #: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049

Topic Content Filename:

Ref. Date Time FROM TO Brief Description

1 30-Mar-10 11:23 AM OMB EPA Interagency Comments OMB Compilation of Interagency Comments 2010-03-30_am1128_OMB2EPA_Interagency Com2 9-Apr-10 1:03 PM EPA OMB Interagency Comments EPA Response to Interagency Comments 2010-04-09_pm0103_EPA2OMB_Response2Intera3 13-Apr-10 10:43 AM OMB EPA HUD Comments Interagency Comments Submitted by HUD 2010-04-13_am1043_OMB2EPA_HUD Comments_4 16-Apr-10 4:00 PM OMB EPA OMB Comments Draft NPRM Health Effects Language 2010-04-16_pm0400_OMB2EPA_HealthEffects_Ha5 20-Apr-10 12:19 PM EPA OMB Interagency Comments EPA Revisions to Economic Analysis 2010-04-20_pm1219_EPA2OMB_EA Revisions_Cle6 21-Apr-10 9:02 AM EPA OMB OMB Requests Draft NPRM Costs-Benefits Summary Table 2010-04-21_am0902_EPA2OMB_LRRP_Clearance7 21-Apr-10 12:24 PM OMB EPA OMB Requests Edits to Costs-Benefits Summary Table 2010-04-21_pm1224_OMB2EPA_SuggestedTables8 21-Apr-10 1:29 PM EPA OMB OMB-sponsored Requests EPA Revisions to Draft NPRM 2010-04-21_pm0129_EPA2OMB_NPRM Revisions9 21-Apr-10 3:37 PM EPA OMB OMB Requests EPA Edits - Costs-Benefits Summary Table 2010-04-21_pm0337_EPA2OMB_ClearanceNPRM_

10 22-Apr-10 9:27 AM EPA OMB OMB Comments EPA Edits - NPRM Health Effects Language 2010-04-22_am0927_EPA2OMB_NPRM Revisions11 22-Apr-10 6:42 PM EPA OMB Final Markup - Draft NPRM Final EPA Markup of Draft NPRM 2010-04-22_pm0642_EPA2OMB_NPRM Revisions

1213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940

Sent to?

NOTE: The files on the CD ROM are identified by the date and time of the written communications, the sending Agency, and a short topic. For example, the first document ithe file name "2010-03-30-am1128_OMB2EPA_Interagency Comments_ClearanceNPRM.pdf ". You may access these documents at the docket facility by either requestthis list or a copy of the CD ROM with all of these documents. [Under "TO:" only the agency that the message was primarily addressed to is listed, but other active interagen

copied.]

TSCA §411 Documentation of Written Interactions w/ OMB & Other Agencies About the Final Rule

Table of Contents

Lead; Clearance and Clearance Testing Requirements for the Renovation, Repair and Painting Program - PRO

When

RIN 2070-AJ57; Docket ID #: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049

1-LRRP-Clearance_NPRM_411docket_Table-of-Content.xls
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 677 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 677

 To authorize testimony and legal representation in Ramsey, et al. v. 
                             Wilson, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony and legal representation in Ramsey, et al. v. 
                             Wilson, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Ramsey, et al. v. Wilson, et al., Case No. 06-82, 
        pending in Federal district court in the Southern District of Ohio, the 
        United States has requested testimony from a former employee of the 
        office of Senator George Voinovich;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its 
        counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any 
        subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official 
        responsibilities;
Whereas, by privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Anthony Condia is authorized to testify in the case 
of Ramsey, et al. v. Wilson, et al., and related proceedings, except 
concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.
    Sec. 2.  The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent 
Anthony Condia in connection with the action referenced in section 1 of 
this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
§ 3050.60 Miscellaneous reports and documents. ( a ) The reports in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section shall be provided at the times indicated in paragraphs (b) through (f).
( b ) A master list of publications and handbooks, including those related to internal information procedures, data collection forms, and corresponding training handbooks by July 1, 2009, and again when changed;
( c ) The items listed in paragraph (b) of this section in electronic form;
( d ) Household Diary Study (when completed);
( e ) Succinct narrative explanations of how the estimates in the most recent Annual Compliance Determination were calculated and the reasons that particular analytical principles were followed. The narrative explanations shall be comparable in detail to that which had been provided in Library Reference 1 in omnibus rate cases processed under the Postal Reorganization Act (by July 1 of each year); and
( f ) An update of the history of changes in postal volumes, revenues, rates, and fees that appears in library references USPS-LR-L-73 through 76 in Docket No. R2006-1 (by July 1 of each year).
[74 FR 20850, May 5, 2009, as amended at 83 FR 49295, Oct. 1, 2018; 85 FR 81141, Dec. 15, 2020]