alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-650-1430-ET; CACA 42078]


Notice of Intention to Relinquish; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy has submitted to the Bureau of Land 
Management a notice of intention to relinquish the withdrawn status of 
42.3 acres of public land in San Bernardino County, California, that 
was withdrawn for military purposes by the California Desert Protection 
Act of 1994.

DATES: Effective June 7, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Duane Marti, (CA-931.4), California 
State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-
1834, Sacramento, California 95825-1886; 916-978-4675.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Department 
of the Navy has submitted, to the Bureau of Land Management, a notice 
of intention to relinquish the withdrawn status of 42.3 acres of public 
land in San Bernardino County, California, that was withdrawn for 
military purposes by the California Desert Protection Act of 1994. The 
land is no longer needed for that purpose, but is needed by the Bureau 
of Land Management for the expansion of the Ridgecrest Regional Wild 
Horse and Burro corrals.
    Pursuant to section 808(b) of the California Desert Protection Act 
of 1994, the Navy has stated that the land was not contaminated and 
that no decontamination measures were required.
    The Navy's notice will be processed in accordance with section 204 
of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, section 808 of 
the California Desert Protection Act of 1994, and the regulations set 
forth in 43 CFR 2370.

    Dated: June 1, 2000.
David McIlnay,
Chief, Branch of Lands.
[FR Doc. 00-14269 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
H. R. 5273

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To clarify the intention of the Congress with regard to the authority of the United

States Mint to produce numismatic coins, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Mint Numismatic

Coin Clarification Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MINT’S AUTHORITY.

(a) SILVER PROOF COINS.—Section 5132(a)(2)(B)(i) of title 31,

United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘paragraphs (1)’’ and

inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2)’’.

(b) PLATINUM COINS.—Section 5112(k) of title 31, United States

Code, is amended by striking ‘‘bullion’’ and inserting ‘‘platinum

bullion coins’’.

SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL REPORT REQUIREMENT.

Section 5134(e)(2) of title 31, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking

‘‘reflect’’ and inserting ‘‘contain’’;

(2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (C);

(3) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (D)

and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

(4) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

‘‘(E) a supplemental schedule detailing—

‘‘(i) the costs and expenses for the production, for

the marketing, and for the distribution of each denomination of circulating coins produced by the Mint during

the fiscal year and the per-unit cost of producing, of

marketing, and of distributing each denomination of

such coins; and
H. R. 5273—2

‘‘(ii) the gross revenue derived from the sales of

each such denomination of coins.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32(b)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alberto-Culver Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Cernugel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ William J. Cernugel

---

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

August 7, 2003
#### § 401.62 Seaway stations.

The Seaway stations are located as follows:

VDX20 (Seaway Beauharnois)—Upper Beauharnois Lock—Traffic Control Sector No. 1.

KEF (Seaway Eisenhower)—Eisenhower Lock—Traffic Control Sector No. 2.

VDX21 (Seaway Iroquois)—Iroquois Lock—Traffic Control Sector No. 3.

WAG (Seaway Clayton)—Clayton, N.Y.—Traffic Control Sector No. 4.

WAG (Seaway Sodus)—Sodus, N.Y.—Traffic Control Sector No. 4.

VDX72 (Seaway Newcastle)—Port Hope, Ontario-Traffic Control Sector No. 5.

VDX70 (Seaway Newcastle)—Port Weller, Ontario-Traffic Control Sector No. 5.

VDX22 (Seaway Welland)—St. Catharines, Ontario—Traffic Control Sector No. 6.

VDX68 (Seaway Long Point)—Port Colborne, Ontario—Traffic Control Sector No. 7.

(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended and secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471)

[39 FR 10900, Mar. 22, 1974, as amended at 40 FR 25813, June 19, 1975; 45 FR 52379, Aug. 7, 1980]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Distributionof meteoritic debris about the Arizona Meteorite Crater**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:2/7
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001061066
 
June 15, 2018
531 P.2d 235

#### Leland Everett PHILLIPS and Margie Louise Phillips, husband and wife, Petitioners, v. Edward J. LODGE, Judge of the District Court of the Third Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Canyon, Respondent.

No. 11730.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Jan. 24, 1975.

C. H. Higer, Higer & McClendon, Emmett, for petitioner.

C. Robert Yost, Canyon County, Pros. Atty. Caldwell, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This is an original proceeding in which this court issued an alternative writ of prohibition requiring the respondent district judge to show cause why a judgment of that court should not be stayed during the pendency of appeal. The judgment resulted from a habeas corpus proceeding concerning the custody of a minor child. The alternative writ is made permanent.

The mother of the minor child, the real party in interest herein, petitioned for habeas corpus in the district court to regain custody of her child who had been residing with its paternal grandparents since September 16, 1971. The grandparents live in Idaho, while the mother lives in Oregon. The mother obtained a default divorce in Oregon which decree awarded her custody of the child. The grandparents were not parties to that decree.

On August 15, 1974 respondent district judge granted the mother’s habeas corpus petition and ordered the child returned to the mother but also ordered that there be a transitional period permitting the child to be gradually reacquainted with its mother. A portion of that order provided the child should visit with her mother in the State of Oregon for one week each month. Thereafter the defendants (petitioners herein) perfected an appeal and moved for a stay of execution of the judgment in habeas corpus. The district court entered an order staying the provisions of its order relating to custody but refused to stay that part of the order relating to visitation. Thereupon this action resulted.

This matter is controlled by Brookshier v. Hyatt, 91 Idaho 305, 420 P.2d 788*474(1966). We note that here the trial court found as a fact that the grandparents were fit and proper persons to have temporary custody of the child and commented that they had done an admirable job in caring for the child. In this case the child has lived with the grandparents in excess of three years. This court has previously issued its order in this case expressly granting visitation rights to the mother during the pendency of the appeal to the extent that such are exercised within the State of Idaho. We find no compelling reason to alter the now existing status quo of the parties during the pendency of the appeal.

We emphasize that this case involves the right of a natural mother to custody of her child and hence this court will not indefinitely maintain the status quo nor tolerate delay in the perfection and completion of the appeal upon the merits. In the event of inordinate delay resulting from action or inaction on the part of the parties, counsel, or any official of the courts, appropriate orders will issue.

The alternative writ is hereby made permanent pending the determination of the appeal on the merits. No costs allowed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-4551

LARRY CHIN, a/k/a Dallas,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge.

(CR-94-361-A)

Submitted: August 29, 1997

Decided: October 2, 1997

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS,

Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Larry Chin, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Larry Chin was convicted by a jury of Count II, distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994); Count III, use of

juveniles in the distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1), 861(a)(1) (1994); Count IV, carrying a firearm during

and in relation to a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C.A.

§ 924(c)(1) (West Supp. 1997); Count V, engaging in a continuing

criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C.A.§ 848(a) (West Supp.

1997); and Count VI, importation of heroin in violation of 21

U.S.C.A. §§ 952(a), 960(b)(2) (West 1981 & Supp. 1997). The district court sentenced Chin to 264 months imprisonment on Counts II,

III, V, and VI and 60 consecutive months on Count IV.

On appeal, we affirmed Chin's convictions under Counts II, III, IV,

and V, but vacated his conviction for Count VI and remanded to the

district court for resentencing. See United States v. Chin, 83 F.3d 83

(4th Cir. 1996). On remand, the district court, by order, vacated

Chin's sentence under Count VI and resentenced him on the remaining four convictions to an identical term of imprisonment. Chin

appeals. Finding no reversible error, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Chin, No. CA-94-361-A (E.D. Va. June

12, 1996). We do not, however, address numerous issues raised by

Chin in his informal brief, because the issues were not before the district court on remand. See United States v. Bell, 5 F.3d 64, 66 (4th Cir.

1993) (holding that the mandate rule "forecloses relitigation of issues

expressly or impliedly decided by the appellate court" and "forecloses

litigation of issues decided by the district court but foregone on

appeal or otherwise waived, for example because they were not raised

in the district court"). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walter S. Berman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Walter S. Berman
--------------------------------
Name:  Walter S. Berman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 14, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37752-37753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-1238, MM Docket No. 00-103, RM-9878]


Digital Television Broadcast Service; Killeen, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by White 
Knight Broadcasting of Killeen License Corporation, licensee of Station 
KAKW(TV), NTSC Channel 62, Killeen, Texas, requesting the substitution 
of DTV Channel 13 for its assigned DTV Channel 23. DTV Channel 13 can 
be allotted to Killeen, Texas, in compliance with the principle 
community coverage requirements of Section 73.625(a) at reference 
coordinates (30-43-33 N and 97-59-24 W). As requested, we propose to 
allot DTV Channel 13 to Killeen with a power of 39.4 and a height above 
average terrain (HAAT) of 553 meters.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before July 31, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before August 15, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room 
TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the 
FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner, or its counsel or 
consultant, as follows: Kathryn R. Schmeltzer, David S. Konczal, 
Fisher, Wayland, Cooper, Leader & Zaragoza, L.L.P., 2001 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20006 (Counsel for White Knight Broadcasting 
of Killeen License Corporation).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-103, adopted June 7, 
2000, and released June 8, 2000. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC Reference Center 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased

[[Page 37753]]

from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription 
Services, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara A. Kreisman,
Chief, Video Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-15266 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5424 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5424

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to authorize 
 communities receiving community development block grants to use grant 
amounts to provide assistance to local firefighting, emergency medical, 
                          and rescue services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2000

  Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to authorize 
 communities receiving community development block grants to use grant 
amounts to provide assistance to local firefighting, emergency medical, 
                          and rescue services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSISTANCE TO FIRE FIGHTING, EMERGENCY MEDICAL, AND RESCUE 
              SERVICES AS ELIGIBLE ACTIVITY UNDER CDBG PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 105(a) of the Housing and Community 
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (23), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting a semicolon; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (23) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(24) provision of assistance to local fire fighting, 
        emergency medical, or rescue services for--
                    ``(A) acquisition, repair, or rehabilitation of 
                equipment (including any accessory, communications, or 
                protective equipment) or vehicles for fire fighting, 
                emergency medical, or rescue services,
                    ``(B) construction, acquisition, rehabilitation, or 
                improvement of facilities for local fire fighting, 
                emergency medical, or rescue services, or
                    ``(C) training or planning involved in providing 
                fire fighting, emergency medical, or rescue services; 
                and''.
    (b) Low- and Moderate-Income Benefit.--Section 105(c) of the 
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(c)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(5) An assisted activity described in subsection (a)(24) shall be 
considered to benefit persons of low and moderate income if the service 
provides such services to all persons in the geographical area served, 
including any low and moderate income persons.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By /s/William S. Ayer
---------------------
William S. Ayer
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003
§ 255.7 Special arrangements for postal services. Members of the public who are unable to use or who have difficulty using certain postal services may be eligible under postal regulations for special arrangements. Some of the special arrangements that the Postal Service has authorized are listed below. No one is required to use any special arrangement offered by the Postal Service, but an individual's refusal to make use of a particular special arrangement does not require the Postal Service to offer other special arrangements to that individual. ( a ) The *Postal Operations Manual* offers information on special arrangements for the following postal services: ( 1 ) Carrier delivery services and programs.
( 2 ) Postal retail services and programs. ( i ) Stamps by mail or phone.
( ii ) Retail service from rural carriers.
( iii ) Self-service postal centers. Self-service postal centers contain vending equipment for the sale of stamps and stamp items, and deposit boxes for parcels and letter mail. Many centers are accessible to individuals in wheelchairs. Information regarding the location of the nearest center may be obtained from a local post office.
( b ) The *Domestic Mail Manual*, the *Administrative Support Manual*, and the *International Mail Manual* contain information regarding postage-free mailing for mailings that qualify.
( c ) *Inquiries and requests.* Members of the public wishing further information about special arrangements for particular postal services may contact their local postal manager.
( d ) *Response to a request or complaint regarding a special arrangement for postal services.* A local postal manager receiving a request or complaint about a special arrangement for postal services must provide any arrangement as required by postal regulations. If no special arrangements are required by postal regulations, the local postal manager, in consultation with the district manager or area manager, as needed, may provide a special arrangement or take any action that will accommodate an individual with a disability as required by section 504 or by this part.
Exhibit 10.23(c)
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Third Amendment you Company Effective Date
 Employment Agreement
 First Amendment 2007
Employment Agreement
 Second
Amendment
  Good Reason
 [NOT
APPLICABLE]
  Good Reason




---



##### 



Knowing and Voluntary .
 Complete Agreement . Good Reason
 Conflict of Terms .
 Construction .
 Execution .
  ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION/s/ Penelope F. Roll
    
    
    
    BY:
    
    /s/ Anthony T. GarciaPenelope F. Roll
    
    
    
    
    
    Anthony T. GarciaCompensation Committee ChairDate: May 5, 2009
    
    
    
    
    
    Date: May 5, 2009
 2