alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3011.203 Unredacted version of the non-public materials. ( a ) Each page or portion of the unredacted version of the materials for which non-public treatment is sought shall be marked in a manner reasonably calculated to alert custodians to the confidential nature of the materials.
( b ) The Filing Online method that results in posting a document that is available to the public, which is accessible through the Commission's website (*http://www.prc.gov*) described under part 3010, subpart B of this chapter may not be used to submit the unredacted version of non-public materials.
( c ) The filing of the unredacted version of the non-public materials shall be made in accordance with the following requirements. ( 1 ) Except if using an alternative system approved by the Commission under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the unredacted version of the non-public materials shall be filed in a sealed envelope clearly marked “Confidential. Do Not Post on Web” to the Office of Secretary and Administration, Postal Regulatory Commission, 901 New York Avenue NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001. The unredacted version of the non-public materials may not be password protected. Two copies of the unredacted version of a non-public document shall be filed using an electronic format such as compact discs (CDs), or digital video discs or digital versatile discs (DVDs) that shall be clearly marked “Confidential. Do Not Post on Web.” If making an electronic unredacted version of a non-public document is impracticable, two hard copies (paper) versions of the non-public document may be filed.
( 2 ) The Secretary of the Commission has authority to approve the use of a secure alternative system to file non-public materials. The Secretary may set forth any minimum requirements associated with using an alternative system. If a filer using the alternative system fails to comply with any of the Secretary's requirements, the Secretary has discretion to revoke the filer's eligibility to use the alternative system or impose requirements specific to the filer as necessary to ensure secure transmission of non-public materials.
( d ) The unredacted version of a spreadsheet shall display the formulas used and their links to related spreadsheets. The unredacted version of workpapers or data shall be submitted in a form, and be accompanied by sufficient explanation and documentation, to allow them to be replicated using a publicly available PC application.
[83 FR 31281, July 3, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 9641, Feb. 19, 2020]
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-11-0339 SAT Date: 5/6/2011 Print Date: 11/29/2013

Related cases : Health related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 31

Exposure Based Review : Health: Yes Exposure based testing (health): Inhalation testing Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG, ONCO, MUTA (UNCERT); IMMUNOTOX (UNCERT)
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-11-0339 FATE: Solid S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 C (E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E)POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low - v.strong PBT Potential: P3B3 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on analogs. There is concern for lung overload if inhaled based on poorly soluble particulates and nano sized materials. There is also concern for oncogenicity if inhaled and based on the nano size of the PMN material. Uncertain concern for mutagenicity and immunotoxicity. Test Data: : negative in Salmonella and E coli with and without activation negative for chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes (in vitro) not a skin irritant

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value *

algal

_ chronic value *
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers-carbon; SAR chemical class = p olyme r -nonionic-carbon nanotubes; MW > 1,000,000 solid with unknown mp (P); S < 0.001 mg/L at 20 °C or negligible (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs nonionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -nonionic-carbon Ecotox CategoryEcotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
#### THEODORE E. WHEELER, Respondent, *v.*JOHN P. SCOFIELD, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

*Mechanic's lien*— *chapter*489 *of*1878 — *consent of owner.*

Under the mechanics’ lien law, chapter 489 of 1878, it is not necessary that every person furnishing materials or labor to a contractor should obtain the consent of the owner of the building to do so. It is enough if the owner, knowing that labor or materials are being furnished to the contractor, does not object to it. In such case he will be deemed to consent to it, and that is all that the legislature requires.

If he is not satisfied that a particular person should perform labor or provide materials, for any reason, he can object to it, and thus prevent such person from ever getting a lien on his property.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

*William S.*Briggs, for appellant. *Morris Brown,*for respondent.

Opinion by

Mullin, P. J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Gilbert, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
Case 1:22-cv-23362-KMW Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2023 Page 1 of 1
Denied and Opinion Filed November 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-01300-CV

IN RE STAN KEITH ODAM, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 15th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 07-1369-015

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Molberg, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

 Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus by which he challenges a trial 

court order altering his parental custody, possession, and support rights and obligations. 

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show both that the trial court has clearly abused 

its discretion and that he has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 

124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the limited 

mandamus record provided to us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief 

requested.

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) 

(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

191300F.P05

/Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                            Mattress Showrooms, Inc.
                                (the Corporation)

We, the  undersigned,  Nelson  Vazquez  (President/Director)  and Douglas Ansell
(Secretary/Director) of the Corporation do hereby certify:

That the board of Directors of the  Corporation  at a meeting duly  convened and
held on the 22nd day of April,  1997, adopted a resolution to amend the original
articles as follows:

Article I is hereby amended to read as follows:

First: The name of the corporation is "International Star, Inc."

The number of shares of the  Corporation  outstanding and entitled to vote on an
amendment  to the  Articles of  Incorporation  are  6,000,000  (prior to forward
split); that the said change(s) and amendment has been consented to and approved
by a majority vote of the stockholders holding at least a majority of each class
of stock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon."

   /s/ Nelson Vazquez                           /s/ Douglas Ansell
-------------------------                   -------------------------
Nelson Vazquez, President                   Douglas Ansell, Secretary

State Of Nevada     -
                    |     ss.               [NOTARIZED]
County Of Clark     -

      The  undersigned  Notary Public  certified  deposes and states that Nelson
Vazquez and Douglas  Ansell,  personally  appeared  before me and  executed  the
foregoing  on  behalf  of  the   Corporation  as  its  President  and  Secretary
respectively, this 23rd day of April, 1997.


                                            By:   /s/ Bridget E. Richards
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Notary Public and for said
                                               County and State
#### § 963.18 Initial decision.

Unless given orally at the conclusion of the hearing, the presiding officer shall render an initial decision as expeditiously as practicable following the conclusion of the hearing and the receipt of the proposed findings and conclusions, if any. The initial decision becomes the final agency decision if a timely appeal is not taken.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)   In connection with the Annual Report of Health Enhancement Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Gorman, Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: April 15, 2011 /s/ John Gorman John Gorman Executive Vice President   A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 32

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
Monumental Marketing, Inc. for the period ended, September 30, 2006,
(the "Report") I, Raanan Alegand, Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Monumental Marketing, Inc.


Date:   January 12, 2007             /s/ Raanan Alergand
                          -----------------------------------------
                                         Raanan Alegand
                                           Treasurer
                                       (Accounting Officer)
### Geology and paleontology of the Haynesville cores: Northeastern Virginia coastal plain

By: R.B. MixonDavid S. Powars**Lauck W. WardGeorge W. AndrewsL. McCartanLucy Edwards**C. Wylie Poag**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1489

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS)

## 				State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS)			

              Dataset
              /
              State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS)
              -  Other Datasets					 

The SOCDS provides data for individual Metropolitan Areas, Central Cities, and Suburbs. Within the SOCDS, the only dataset that is being actively updated is the Building Permits Database.
/socds.huduser.gov/permits/index.html class=text method=get>For                   information on local building permits see:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4991

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with the

city of Loveland, Colorado, to use Colorado-Big Thompson Project facilities for the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water for

domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. SCHAFFER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into

contracts with the city of Loveland, Colorado, to use

Colorado-Big Thompson Project facilities for the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject water for

domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT

4 FACILITIES FOR NONPROJECT WATER.

5 The Secretary of the Interior may enter into con6 tracts with the city of Loveland, Colorado, or its Water
2

•HR 4991 IH

1 and Power Department or any other agency, public utility,

2 or enterprise of the city, providing for the use of facilities

3 of the Colorado-Big Thompson Project, Colorado, under

4 the Act of February 21, 1911 (43 U.S.C. 523), for—

5 (1) the impounding, storage, and carriage of

6 nonproject water originating on the eastern slope of

7 the Rocky Mountains for domestic, municipal, indus8 trial, and other beneficial purposes; and

9 (2) the exchange of water originating on the

10 eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains for the pur11 poses specified in paragraph (1), using facilities as12 sociated with the Colorado-Big Thompson Project,

13 Colorado.

Æ
# Appendix tab descriptions

# Water quality

# Site visit QA

# Monthly stats
#### § 762.22 Definitions.

For definitions applicable to this subpart see § 762.12 of this chapter.
§ 7.1 Definitions. For purposes of §§ 7.2 through 7.8 of these bylaws: ( a ) The term *Board* means the Board of Governors, and any subdivision or committee of the Board authorized to take action on behalf of the Board.
( b ) The term *meeting* means the deliberations of at least the number of individual members required to take action on behalf of the Board under § 5.2 or § 6.6 of these bylaws, where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of the official business of the Board. The term ”meeting” does not include any procedural deliberations required or permitted by §§ 6.1, 6.2, 7.4, or 7.5 of the bylaws in this chapter, or the notation voting process described in § 6.7 of the bylaws in this chapter.
[73 FR 78983, Dec. 24, 2008, as amended at 77 FR 17334, Mar. 26, 2012]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company)
for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall   
|    |  | Keith J. Randall       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | March 30, 2007
8040,5 

# FAA" 2..0

# '0- eoo 09/29106 

### Contacts, With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal bern discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date 

### Response I'\alional BliSillc.~_~

'\ir~rafl ,\ ••.

~ocialion Eli CoHi 

# ~-j,lro 1~~giu"31Aidinl· Assucialiull J)aH l.ullcnT 

# ,-A/tv Aircrafl Owncl-s& Pilots A~s"daliOIl Ro!Jl·rl H;lckmilll 

# ,/c1u ,\TA ;\1 LllPez 

# ~lto
#### ESTATE OF Patria P. CORUM and Don L. Corum, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 13469.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 1958.

Donelson & Adams, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioners.

Charles K. Rice, Nelson P. Rose, Lee A. Jackson, Joseph F. Goetten and John J. McGarvey, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Circuit Judge, and JONES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for review of decisions of the Tax Court (1) that peti*552tioner received income which he failed to report in his returns in the years 1949 and 1950 in the amounts of $2,100 and $24,000, respectively, the sums of checks made payable to and/or endorsed by petitioner which he failed to prove were not paid to him for his own use and benefit, and (2) that the failure to report these amounts was due to fraud with intent to evade taxes. In addition, an understatement of $360 was found in 1946 and another of $770 in 1947, which last has been conceded by the Commissioner.

After due consideration the Court concludes that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the decision as to the deficiencies, but that the failure to report this income was not due to fraud with intent to evade tax as this offense is viewed by this Court (see Hawkins v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1956, 234 F.2d 359; Kashat v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1956, 229 F.2d 282; Dreiborg v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1956, 225 F.2d 216.

The sums found by the Tax Court to be income represent the gross amounts of checks cashed by him and were found to be gambling winnings. No credit for gambling losses was permitted. While we think that the Commissioner probably was justified in assessing a deficiency in the total amount of these checks, in the absence of substantial countervailing proof by the taxpayer, common knowledge teaches us that by the law of averages the taxpayer, even in a friendly or sociable game, conceivably must have had a substantial measure of losses. This, as we think, very well could have been conceded and credited by the taxing authority on a reasonable percentage basis.

Accordingly, the decisions of the Tax Court are affirmed with respect to deficiencies in the years 1946,1949 and 1950, reversed as to the findings of fraud, and remanded for correction of the decisions as to the year 1947.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000033 16-JUL-2013 11:03 AM
§ 778.8 How does the Postal Service provide states an opportunity to comment on proposed facility project actions? ( a ) Except in unusual circumstances, the Postal Service gives state processes or directly affected state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) At least 60 days from the date established by the Postal Service to comment on proposed facility project actions (except as noted in paragraph (a)(3) of this section).
( 3 ) For facility project actions in the Washington, DC National Capital Region, coordination also is accomplished with the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC). The Postal Service gives the NCPC 90 days to comment on projects in the Maryland and Virginia portions of the National Capital Region.
( b ) This section also applies to comments in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Postal Service have been delegated.
§ 3040.190 Minor corrections to product descriptions. ( a ) The Postal Service shall ensure that product descriptions in the Mail Classification Schedule accurately represent the current offerings of the Postal Service.
( b ) The Postal Service shall submit minor corrections to product descriptions in the Mail Classification Schedule by filing notice with the Commission no later than 15 days prior to the effective date of the proposed corrections.
( c ) The notice shall: ( 1 ) Explain why the proposed corrections do not constitute material changes to the product description for purposes of § 3040.180;
( 2 ) Explain why the proposed corrections are consistent with the policies and the applicable criteria of chapter 36 of title 39 of the United States Code, the applicable requirements of this part, and any applicable Commission directives and orders; and
( 3 ) Include a copy of the applicable sections of the Mail Classification Schedule and the proposed corrections therein in legislative format.
[80 FR 35575, June 22, 2015. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 9615, 9659, Feb. 19, 2020; 85 FR 81138, Dec. 15, 2020]
§ 965.9 Evidence. ( a ) In general, admissibility will hinge on relevancy and materiality. However, relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( b ) Testimony shall be given under oath or affirmation and witnesses are subject to cross-examination.
[52 FR 29012, Aug. 5, 1987, as amended at 76 FR 15219, Mar. 21, 2011]
Case 1:22-cv-23297-JEM   Document 10   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2022   Page 1 of 1