alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04857**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04857\04857_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04857\04857_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04857\04857_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04857\04857_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04857\04857_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04857\04857_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04857\04857_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04857\04857_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04857\04857_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04857\Certification Statement Plant ID 04857.pdf Plant certification statement 04857\Supplemental Documentation\04857 Coyote A5-2 Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 04857\Supplemental Documentation\04857_Coyote A5-2 Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04857\Supplemental Documentation\04857_Coyote A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04857\Supplemental Documentation\04857_Coyote D3-1 Pond 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04857\Supplemental Documentation\04857_Coyote F5-6 Wells.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04857\04857_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04857\04857_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

December 1, 2008 

Michael Elges, Chief 

Bureau of Air Quality Planning 

Nevada Division of Environmental Protection 

901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 4001 

Carson City, Nevada 89701 

Dear Mr. Elges: 

In response to your request, dated September 29,2008, the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region IX, (EPA) hereby grants to the Nevada Division of 

Environmental Protection (NDEP) formal delegation of the following Code of Federal 

Regulations, Title 40, Part 63 (40 CFR Part 63) National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) recently promulgated in the Federal Register: 

The amendments to Subpart DDDD as set forth in 72 FR 61060 (October 

29,2007) 

The amendments to Subparts A and ZZZZ as set forth in 73 FR 3568 

(January 18,2008) 

The amendments to Subpart EEEEE as set forth in 73 FR 72 10 (February 

7,2008) 

Subpart WWWWW as set forth in 72 FR 7361 1 (December 28,2007) 

Subpart YYYYY as set forth in 72 FR 74088 (December 28,2007) 

Subpart ZZZZZ as set forth in 73 FR 226 (January 2,2008) 

The amendments to Subparts EEEEEE and FFFFFF as set forth in 72 FR 

36363 (July 3,2007) 

Subparts LLLLLL, MMMMMM, NNNNNN, 000000, PPPPPP, and 

QQQQQQ as set forth in 72 FR 38864 (July 16,2007) and amended in 73 

FR 15923 (March 26,2008) 

Subparts RRRRRR, SSSSSS, TTTTTT as set forth in 72 FR 73 180 

(December 26,2007). 

In this letter, we are responding only to your request for delegation of 40 CFR 

Part 63 NESHAP. You will receive a separate letter addressing delegation of 40 CFR 

Part 60 Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources. 

These delegations are being granted in accordance with the September 3, 1997, 

Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between NDEP and EPA regarding the delegation 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
of NESHAP. As set forth in the MOA, these delegations are effective upon the date of 

this letter and EPA will publish a future Federal Register notice to codify these 

delegations into the Code of Federal Regulations. 

We appreciate NDEP's efforts to implement the federal air toxics program and 

hope to continue working with you to reduce emissions of air toxics in Nevada. If you 

have any questions about this delegation, please call me at (4 15) 947-87 15 or have your 

staff contact Mae Wang at (4 15) 947-4 124. 

Sincerely, 

cc: Adele Malone, NDEP - Bureau of Air Quality Planning
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AISHA PERRY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 177 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Order entered July 14, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-22-00030-CV

IN RE MELISSA LARSEN,THE CARDIO GROUP, LLC, LARSEN MEDICAL, LLC D/B/A CARDIOVASC ULAR DEVICES SERVICES, LLC,

PRACTICE FREEDOM COACHING LLC, CARDIOLOGY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA LLC, TRACTION IN TEGRATED SYSTEMS, LLC AND CARDIOCLOUD, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. DC-18-05693, DC-21-04344

ORDER Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we LIFT the stay in this case and

DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

/David J. Schenck /

DAVID J. SCHENCK
JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                             18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Security  Biometrics,  Inc.
(the
"Company")  on  Form  10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the "Report"), I,
Michel  Berty,
Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that;

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

/s/  Michel  Berty
----------------------
Chief  Executive  Officer

November  14,  2003



                                       24
<PAGE>
#### § 241.1 Purpose.

This rule gives general instructions on the implementation of section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended by section 201 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, Public Law 102-588, for application to flood control projects.

[60 FR 5133, Jan. 26, 1995]
Exhibit 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alberto-Culver Company (the company) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), I, Howard B. Bernick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Howard B. Bernick

---

Howard B. Bernick

President and Chief Executive
Officer

May 6, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the consol-
idated balance sheet as of March 31, 1997 and the consolidated statement of 
earnings for the six months ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000003327
<NAME>                        ALBERTO-CULVER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.00
<CASH>                          $85,437
<SECURITIES>                      7,500
<RECEIVABLES>                   134,753
<ALLOWANCES>                      8,708
<INVENTORY>                     310,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                561,023
<PP&E>                          327,157
<DEPRECIATION>                  145,258
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  968,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           304,585
<BONDS>                         157,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                         13,645
<OTHER-SE>                      451,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    968,262
<SALES>                         865,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                865,682
<CGS>                           433,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   433,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                377,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  2,693
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                6,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  70,707
<INCOME-TAX>                     26,338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              44,369
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     44,369
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .73                                   

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glenn S. Johnson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge,





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











By    /s/Glenn S. Johnson


Glenn S.
Johnson


Chief
Financial Officer


August 7,
2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 22-CR-80144-RS 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. 

JOFF STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT, et al., 

Defendants. 

________________________________________/ 

 

NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ATTORNEY

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United 

States Attorney, and hereby files this Notice of Removal, pursuant to Section 3D of the Southern 

District of Florida CM/ECF NextGen Administrative Procedures. The undersigned will be leaving 

the United States Attorney’s Office. AUSA Marc Osborne has already filed a Notice of Appearance 

and will remain as lead counsel on the matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

MARKENZY LAPOINTE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

By: s/A. Marie Villafaña 

A. MARIE VILLAFAÑA 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Florida Bar No. 0018255 

500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

Telephone: 561 820-8711/Facsimile: 561 820-8777 

ann.marie.villafana@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on February 14, 2023, a copy of this pleading was served and filed with 

the Court’s CM/ECF filing system upon all counsel of record. 

s/A. Marie Villafaña 

Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 203 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in VoIP,  Inc.  and its
Subsidiaries  2004 Stock Option Plan's  Registration  Statement on Form S-8 (SEC
File Number  333-122299)  of our report  dated  March 16,  2005  relating to the
consolidated   financial  statements  which  appear  in  Voip,  Inc.'s  and  its
Subsidiaries  Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December 31, 2004,  filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and to all references to our firm included in
this registration statement.



Berkovits, Lago & Company, LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 29, 2005
§ 447.42 Additional prohibited political activities. ( a ) In addition to the restrictions on political activities mentioned in § 447.51, an employee may not: ( 1 ) Display a political picture or sticker on property owned or leased by the Postal Service. He is not forbidden by this paragraph, however, from displaying a picture, including a personally autographed picture of a political figure in his office or place of work if it has no language in the nature of political campaigning;
( 2 ) Wear a political badge or button while in uniform or while on duty when that duty requires him to deal with the public or be in the view of the public;
( 3 ) Display a political picture or sticker on his private vehicle while that vehicle is being used for official postal purposes.
[39 FR 1990, Jan. 16, 1974. Redesignated at 60 FR 47245, Sept. 11, 1995]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTotal energy-rate feedback for automatic glide-slope tracking during wind-shear penetrationLow-altitude wind shear is recognized as an infrequent but significant hazard to all aircraft during the take-off and landing phases of flight. A total energy-rate sensor was developed for measuring the specific total energy rate of an airplane with respect to the air mass. Control-system designs, both with and without energy-rate feedback, for the approach to landing of a transport airplane through a severe-wind-shear and gust environment are presented in order to evaluate this application of the sensor. A system model incorporates wind-shear-dynamics equations with the airplane equations of motion to permit analysis of the control systems under various wind-shear conditions. The control systems are designed using optimal-output feedback and are analyzed using frequency-domain control-theory techniques. Control-system performance is evaluated using a complete nonlinear simulation of the airplane combined with a severe-wind-shear and gust data package. This evaluation is concerned with control system stability and regulation capability only.Document ID19850015490Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBelcastro, C. M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Ostroff, A. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1984Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberL-15845NAS 1.60:2412NASA-TP-2412Accession Number85N23801Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-45-33Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850015490.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 22-20326-CR-KMM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANDRE LORQUET 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

HIS MOTION TO WITHDRAW GUILTY PLEA

Defendant, Andre Loquet, through undersigned counsel, moves the Court to 

withdraw his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which is filed ECF 55. This motion 

is unopposed.

On March 13, Mr. Lorquet moved to withdraw his guilty plea. ECF 55. His 

lawyer also moved to withdraw from representing him on the same date. ECF 56. On

March 31, 2023, the Court granted his lawyer’s motion to withdraw as counsel. ECF 

61. On June 13, 2023, the Court appointed the undersigned to represent Mr. Lorquet.

Although Magistrate Judge Lauren Louis entered a report and 

recommendation to grant the motion to withdraw the guilty plea, the motion is 

pending before this Court. At the June 27, 2023 status conference, the Court provided

Mr. Lorquet until July 28, 2023 to respond to the government’s objection to Judge 

Louis R&R or otherwise communicate whether he will continue to pursue withdraw

of his guilty plea.

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

After conferring with undersigned counsel, Mr. Lorquet moves the Court to 

withdraw his motion his guilty plea. We further request that The Court schedule Mr. 

Lorquet’s case for sentencing. In making that request, we respectfully request that 

the Court schedule the hearing the week of August 21, 2023 or later, as AUSA 

Jonathan Bailyn will be in trial the week of August 14th and the undersigned will 

traveling, moving one of his daughter’s into her freshmen dorm between August 12 

and August 16, 2023. 

WHEREFORE, the defendant, Andre Lorquet, respectfully requests that the 

Court enter an order withdrawing his motion to withdraw his guilty plea at ECF 55.

A proposed order is attached. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on July 24, 2023, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing has been furnished electronically via CMCEF to all counsel of record.

Respectfully submitted, 

BELL ROSQUETE REYES ESTEBAN, PLLC

Henry P. Bell

Fla. Bar No. 090689

999 Ponce De Leon Blvd. 

Suite 810

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 570-1610

Facsimile: (305) 570-1599

Email: hbell@bresq.com

Counsel to Andre Lorquet

By: ____s/Henry P. Bell_____

Henry P. Bel

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
Appendix C.10 - AmeriCorps Seniors FGP-SCP Letters of Agreement for In-Home Assignments

Appendix C.10 - FGP-SCP Letters of Agreement for In-Home Assignments

# Appendix C.10 – Sample AmeriCorps Seniors FGP/SCP Letter of Agreement for In-Home Assignments

**Letter of Agreement for In-Home Assignment**

The **ABC Foster Grandparent Program/Senior Companion Program**has been asked by  ______________________________________________________________ to place 

		(Volunteer Station)

____________________________________________________________ in the home of 

		(Name of AmeriCorps Seniors volunteer)

________________________________________________________________________.

(Name)				(Address)

The following services are approved by the volunteer station and AmeriCorps Seniors FGP/SCP staff and will be performed by the AmeriCorps Seniors  volunteer:_____________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

The volunteer may not be paid for their services. They may not do custodial work or work normally performed by a paid worker. 

The Volunteer Station Supervisor for this assignment is: ________________________________

The AmeriCorps Seniors volunteer is requested to serve: ________________________________________ 

(Day(s) of the Week)

from ________________________________ to __________________________________.

	       (Approximate Service Schedule)

*Volunteer services may be terminated by the sponsor at any time upon request of any of the undersigned parties.*

Signed:  _____________________________________________________

	 	 Sponsor Representative				Date

	  	_____________________________________________________

	  	Volunteer Station Representative			Date

	 	 _____________________________________________________

	  	Person Served or Legally Responsible Person	Date	 

*Version 2020.3										Pg.*1*of 1This document is provided as a sample ONLY. Its use is optional and, if used, it should be customized as appropriate. For all appendices, including editable versions of samples and templates, visit**https://www.nationalservice.gov/operations-handbook-appendices.*

*Version 2017.1		Pg.*2*of 2*

This document is provided as a sample ONLY. Its use is optional and, if used, it should be customized as appropriate.

# image1.jpeg
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Structureof the Reelfoot-Rough Creek rift system, fluorspar area fault complex and Hicksdome, southern Illinois and western Kentucky: new constraints from regionalseismic reflection data**
 
Report | Plate One
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1538-Q
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001061116
 
June 15, 2018
#### LUKE MALLOY, Respondent, *v.*ANN McCONNELL, Appellant.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the defendant for $752.50, entered upon the report of a referee.

The action was brought to recover the value of a quantity of horse feed alleged to have been sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant, who was executrix of her husband’s will, after the death *666of the testator, for the use of the testator’s estate, alleged to have been used in the feeding of horses belonging to said estate. •

The General Term, after a review of the facts, *held,*that the exclusion of evidence tending to show that the defendant did not hold the horses as part of the assets of the estate, and that they belonged to another person, was error, more especially because there was no original contract with-defendant in relation to the feed, and if she did not own the horses, her promises to pay for the feed could not be enforced, as they would be made in such case to pay the debt of a third person and be void under the statute of frauds.

*Lewis Johnston*and *Albert Mathews,*for the appellant.

*Nathaniel A. Prentiss,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., concurred in result; Daniels, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.