alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 523 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 523

To encourage States to enter into agreements with other States for the 
  establishment of conforming regulations governing the provision of 
                 limousine service between the States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To encourage States to enter into agreements with other States for the 
  establishment of conforming regulations governing the provision of 
                 limousine service between the States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGULATION OF INTERSTATE LIMOUSINE SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided by subsection (b), no State or 
political subdivision thereof and no interstate agency or other 
political agency of 2 or more States may enact or enforce any law, 
rule, regulation, standard, or other provision having the force and 
effect of law that restricts the operation of a motor vehicle providing 
limousine service between a place in a State and a place in another 
State unless the States have in effect an agreement or compact 
concerning the regulation of interstate limousine service that allows 
for the restriction.
    (b) Exception.--A State may enact and enforce a law, rule, 
regulation, standard, or other provision having the force and effect of 
law that requires an individual providing limousine service described 
in subsection (a) to register each vehicle with the State before 
providing such service and may impose a fee upon such an individual to 
cover the administrative costs associated with such registration, 
except that the fee may not exceed $50 per vehicle annually. Any State 
that requires such registration shall permit an individual to submit 
the registration (and any fee associated with the registration) by 
mail.
    (c) Consent of Congress.--The consent of Congress is hereby given 
to 2 or more States to negotiate and enter into agreements or compacts 
described in subsection (a), except that no such agreement or compact 
may be in conflict with any law of the United States.
    (d) State Defined.--In this Act, the term ``State'' means the 50 
States and the District of Columbia.
                                 <all>
```
§ 913.2 Service. ( a ) Service within the United States. A subpoena issued under this section may be served by a person designated under section 3061 of title 18 at any place within the territorial jurisdiction of any court of the United States.
( b ) Foreign service. Any such subpoena may be served upon any person who is not to be found within the territorial jurisdiction of any court of the United States, in such manner as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure describe for service in a foreign country. To the extent that the courts of the United States may assert jurisdiction over such person consistent with due process, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have the same jurisdiction to take any action respecting compliance with this section by such person that such court would have if such person were personally within the jurisdiction of such court.
( c ) Service on business persons. Service of any such subpoena may be made upon a partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity by— ( 1 ) Delivering a duly executed copy thereof to any partner, executive officer, managing agent, or general agent thereof, or to any agent thereof authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process on behalf of such partnership, corporation, association, or entity;
( 2 ) Delivering a duly executed copy thereof to the principal office or place of business of the partnership, corporation, association, or entity; or
( 3 ) Depositing such copy in the United States mails, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, duly addressed to such partnership, corporation, association, or entity at its principal office or place of business.
( d ) Service on natural persons. Service of any subpoena may be made upon any natural person by— ( 1 ) Delivering a duly executed copy to the person to be served; or
( 2 ) Depositing such copy in the United States mails, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, duly addressed to such person at his residence or principal office or place of business.
( e ) Verified return. A verified return by the individual serving any such subpoena setting forth the manner of such service shall be proof of such service. In the case of service by registered or certified mail, such return shall be accompanied by the return post office receipt of delivery of such subpoena.
### Paleogeography and the Late Cretaceous of the Western Interior of middle North America; coal distribution and sediment accumulation

By: Laura N. Robinson RobertsMark A. Kirschbaum

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1561

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (976 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 3041.105 General. ( a ) This part applies to competitive negotiated service agreements.
( b ) When a general rule conflicts with a rule governing a specific streamlined option, the rule governing the specific streamlined option shall take precedence.
( c ) Commission findings that the addition of a competitive negotiated service agreement to the competitive product list is not inconsistent with the standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633 are provisional and subject to subsequent review.
( d ) The addition of a competitive negotiated service agreement to the competitive product list is limited to the term of the negotiated service agreement, as it may be extended. The Commission will remove a negotiated service agreement from the competitive product list automatically upon the expiration or termination of the negotiated service agreement. Any request to remove a negotiated service agreement from the competitive product list unrelated to expiration or termination of the negotiated service agreement shall follow the applicable procedures outlined in part 3040 of this chapter.
( e ) When a rule in subpart E of this part conflicts with a provision of a negotiated service agreement added to the competitive product list before September 19, 2024, the provision of the negotiated service agreement shall take precedence.
#### § 80.1440 Port Allen, Kauai, HI.

A line drawn from 21°53′34.3′′ N., 159°36′15.6′′ W. (Puolo Point Light) to 21°53′49.0′′ N., 159°35′27.2′′ W. (Hanapepe Breakwater Light 2).

[USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38431, July 7, 2014]
----

**Item      13. Exhibits**

| Exhibit                No. | Description                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.1                        | Contribution                and Distribution Agreement by and between Besicorp and WOM.1                                                                               |
| 3(i)                       | Certificate                of Incorporation of WOM, Inc.2                                                                                                              |
| 3(ii)                      | By-Laws                of WOM, Inc.                                                                                                                                         |
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 10.1                       | Indemnification                Agreement dated as of March 22, 1999** **by and among                Old Besicorp, Besicorp, BGI Parent and BGI Acquisition3       |
| 10.2                       | Escrow                Agreement dated as of March 22, 1999** **by and among                Besicorp, Old Besicorp, BGI Parent and BGI Acquisition.4               |
| 10.3                       | Amendment                No.1 to the Escrow Agreement dated as of February 23, 2000 by and                among                Besicorp, Old Besicorp, BGI Parent and WOM.5 |
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 31.1                       | Rule                13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) certification                                                                                                                     |
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 31.2                       | Rule                13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) certification                                                                                                                     |
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                        |
| 32.1                       | Section                1350 certifications                                                                                                                                  |

----
Order entered September 9, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00909-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF O.M. AND M.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-53875-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 5, 2019 motion to extend time to file her 

opening brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s opening brief be filed no later 

than September 25, 2019.

We note the motion does not include the certificate of conference required by Texas Rule 

of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5). Any further motions shall include the certificate.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge,





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














By   /s/William S. Ayer


William
S. Ayer


Chairman
& Chief Executive Officer


August 7,
2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT C. D-S., Respondent

v. B.M.D., Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 831 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 24th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Mississippi State Department of Health

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

Goals

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Through robust partnerships, 

develop a result-based, comprehensive 

strategy for reducing falls and falls risk 

among older adults and adults with 

disabilities living in your community; and

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in evidence-based falls 

prevention programs, while concurrently 

pursuing the sustainability of these 

programs beyond the end of the grant 

period.

The Mississippi State Department of Health 

(MSDH) and its partners will:

• Increase fall prevention education and 

awareness among older adults and adults 

with disabilities in the top 30 counties in 

MS with high-risk fall rates.

• Engage participants with Traumatic Brain 

Injury (TBI) related disabilities in 

evidenced-based interventions in highrisk areas.

• Establish a Fall Prevention Task Force.

• Increase the number of leaders 

and master trainers in proposed 

interventions.

Proposed Interventions

• A Matter of Balance

• Bingocize

• EnhanceFitness

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, MSDH will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• American Physical Therapy Association –

Mississippi Chapter

• Area Agencies on Aging

• Brain Injury Association of Mississippi

• Mississippi Department of Human 

Services

• Mississippi State Department of 

Rehabilitation Services

• Mississippi State University - Department 

of Kinesiology

• YMCA
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2021, effective May 1, 2021

Anticipated Results 

The MSDH and its partners propose to achieve 

the following results:

• Engage older adults and adults with TBI 

related disabilities in MOB, Bingocize and 

EnhanceFitness Programs.

• Achieve an 86% participant completion 

rate in Bingocize, EnhanceFitness and 

A Matter of Balance (MOB).

• Enhance referral system with partner 

network and Fall Prevention Task Force.

• Increase public and stakeholder 

awareness fall prevention programs and 

resources.

Contact:

Tasha Lock

Mississippi State Department of Health

Tasha.Lock@msdh.ms.gov

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
§ 954.13 Appearances. ( a ) The General Counsel of the Postal Service or a member of his or her staff designated by him or her shall represent the authorized official.
( b ) A publisher or intervenor may appear and be heard in person or by attorney. Attorneys may practice before the Postal Service in accordance with applicable rules issued by the Judicial Officer. See part 951 of this chapter.
( c ) An attorney representing a publisher or intervenor shall file a written authorization from the publisher or intervenor before he or she may participate in the proceeding. The publisher or intervenor must promptly file a notice of change of attorneys.
( d ) When a publisher or intervenor is represented by an authorized attorney all subsequent pleadings shall be served upon the attorney.
[36 FR 11567, June 16, 1971, as amended at 62 FR 66998, Dec. 23, 1997]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian K. Hutchison, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the
period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       |  |       |  |              
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----- |  | -------------
|/s/    BRIAN K. HUTCHISON                              |  | Date: |  | March 16,2006
|Name: Brian K. Hutchison                               |  |       |  |              
|Title: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  |       |  |              



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7356

EDDIE L. HALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(CA-03-2960-8)

Submitted: November 19, 2004 Decided: December 9, 2004

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie L. Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Eddie L. Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the report of a magistrate judge, granting the

respondents’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his

petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be

taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
JONATHAN PONCE, 

Plaintiff, 

V. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Case No. 22-81546-CV-MIDDLEBROOKS 

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERISTY 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, 

Defendant. 

I ---------------

O RD ER CLOSING CASE 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal 

with Prejudice, filed on September 22, 2023. (DE 73). The Court congratulates the Parties on 

their amicable resolution of this matter and notes that pursuant to Ana go Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, 

LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012), the Parties' Stipulation is self-executing and no Order of the 

Court is required to dismiss this action. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 

1) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE TIDS CASE. 

2) All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 

3) Pursuant to the Parties' request, and to the extent permitted by law in view of the 

foregoing precedent, I will reserve jurisdiction, for a period of forty-five (45) days to 

enforce the terms of the Parties' Settlement Agreement. 

Copies to: Counsel of Record 

er, 2023. 

UNITED 

.ALD 

STATES 

M. MIDD 

DISTRICT 

EBROOKS 

JUDGE 

~ 

Case 9:22-cv-81546-DMM Document 74 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 3013.1 Scope and applicability of other parts of this title. ( a ) The rules in this part govern the procedures for compelling the production of information by the Postal Service pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 504(f).
( b ) Subparts A, B, and D to part 3010 of this chapter apply unless otherwise stated in this part or otherwise ordered by the Commission.
[75 FR 22107, Apr. 27, 2010, as amended at 85 FR 9645, Feb. 19, 2020]
#### § 80.1112 Newport Bay, CA.

A line drawn from Newport Bay East Jetty Light 4 to Newport Bay West Jetty Light 3.

[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]