alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ell
 

tion?
 

CT 

 labeled 

meet strict 

ater effi

ushing 

. 

abeled 

or exceed 

mbing 

 standards. 

ings 

s and 

ate 

erSense 

s can be 

 other, less 

dels. 

vs. 

Flush 

The Truth About 

High-Efficiency Toilets 

FACT 

Flush 

FICTION 

EPA-832-F-07-012 

(866) WTR-SENS (987-7367) 

www.epa.gov/watersense · watersense@epa.gov 

June 2008 
-

Not your father’s low-flow...
 

tion “low 

us in the early 

complained 

en, needed 

l, or caused 

mbing. 

water

h issues, 

and kept 

oth water 

nd technolog

h-efficiency toi

r flush and 

han—conven

on Agency’s 

making it easy 

efficiency 

ts that are 

party testing 

or both 

 earn the 

erSense 

se myths keep 

ng money! 

Myth: Low-flow = poor performance FACT: WaterSense labeled toilets get the job done. Many tend to associate lower flow with lower flushing power. Not true. New technology and design advancements, such as pressure-assisted flushers and modifications to bowl contours allow high-efficiency toilets to flush better than first-generation low-flow toilets. All WaterSense labeled toilets have met EPA’s efficiency and performance requirements, meaning double-flushing and clogging will not be an issue (but remember—any toilet will clog if used as a trash can). Myth: High-efficiency toilets cause problems with home plumbing systems. FACT: WaterSense labeled toilets meet or exceed plumbing standards. Some consumers worry that lower flows may back up pipes and ruin home plumbing. There is no need to worry. WaterSense labeled high-efficiency toilets meet or exceed all national plumbing standards required of tank-type toilets. 

Myth: High-efficiency toilets are too expensive. FACT: With the potential for rebates and lower water bills, WaterSense labeled toilets can save you more money than you think. Considering the potential savings on water bills, it could be more costly not to purchase a WaterSense labeled toilet. Also, many local utilities offer rebates ranging from $25 to more than $200 to replace older toilets with new, waterefficient models. In many cases, with cost savings and rebates, a WaterSense labeled toilet can pay for itself in only a few years. Myth: High-efficiency toilets are not available in the style I want. FACT: WaterSense labeled toilets are available in a wide range of models. Numerous WaterSense labeled toilets are already available at retailers in many regions in a range of styles for standard to high-end bathrooms. EPA’s WaterSense label helps consumers easily identify high-performing, high-efficiency toilets, so look for the WaterSense label and start saving water while you upgrade your bathroom!
Exhibit 31.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Danny Hon, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Q-Net
Technologies, Inc;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
aspects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

                  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

                  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

                  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

         6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in
this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls and in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 29, 2004


/s/ Danny Hon
------------------------------------
Danny Hon, Chief Financial Officer

Q-Net Technologies, Inc.
United States Steel Corporation – Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request

April 24, 2012

Item 13

Provide written explanation and supporting documents of how the facility could use NOX CEMs 

for process optimization.

Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or 

were consulted in the preparation of the response:

Stephani Campbell, Chrissy Bartovich

Answer: 

Please refer to Minntac response to Item 13 for this item as the response provided therein applies 

to both Keetac and Minntac.
### Early Paleozoic alkalic and calc-alkalic plutonism and associated contact metamorphism, central Virginia Piedmont

By: Louis PavlidesJoseph G. ArthJ. F. SutterT. W. SternHenry Cortesini Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1529

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (19539 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (4355 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (4712 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5146 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5146

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the use of 
  amounts in the Presidential Election Campaign Fund for presidential 
              nominating conventions of political parties.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2000

   Mr. Chabot (for himself, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. DeLay, and Mr. Rogan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the use of 
  amounts in the Presidential Election Campaign Fund for presidential 
              nominating conventions of political parties.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING USE OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN FUNDS FOR 
              PARTY CONVENTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 95 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking section 9008.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections of chapter 95 of 
such Code is amended by striking the item relating to section 9008.

SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Availability of Payments to Candidates.--The third sentence of 
section 9006(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
striking ``, section 9008(b)(3),''.
    (b) Reports by Federal Election Commission.--Section 9009(a) of 
such Code is amended--
            (1) by adding ``and'' at the end of paragraph (2);
            (2) by striking the semicolon at the end of paragraph (3) 
        and inserting a period; and
            (3) by striking paragraphs (4), (5), and (6).
    (c) Penalties.--Section 9012 of such Code is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking the second sentence; 
        and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (2) and 
        redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2).
    (d) Availability of Payments From Presidential Primary Matching 
Payment Account.--The second sentence of section 9037(a) of such Code 
is amended by striking ``and for payments under section 9008(b)(3)''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
elections occurring after December 31, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 957.11 Witness fees.

Each party is responsible for the fees and costs for its own witnesses.
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>

                                Neff & Ricci LLP
                   Consultants & Certified Public Accountants
                         6100 Uptown Blvd, NE, Suite 400
                              Albuquerque, NM 87110
                                Tel: 505-830-6200
                                Fax: 505-830-6282
                              Web: www.neffcpa.com



                Independent Certified Public Accountants' Consent



Board of Directors
Alamogordo Financial Corporation


We have issued our report dated August 18, 2004, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Alamogordo Financial Corporation, which are included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Corporation's Form S-8 (333-66942).


/s/ Neff & Ricci LLP


Albuquerque, New Mexico
October 8, 2004
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By    /s/ William S. Ayer
   ------------------------------------
William S. Ayer
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2003
### Hydrology of the Floridan aquifer system in Southeast Georgia and adjacent parts of Florida and South Carolina

By: R.E. KrauseR.B. Randolph

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1403D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 14**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 15**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 17**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 18**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 19**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 3010.335 Intermediate decisions. ( a ) An intermediate decision shall be issued by the presiding officer which rules upon the matters that are before the Commission, or provides explanation for why such rulings are not being provided, in a proceeding on the record with the opportunity for a hearing when: ( 1 ) The Commission is not sitting *en banc;* or
( 2 ) The presiding office has been directed to issue an intermediate decision by Commission notice or order.
( b ) Intermediate decisions shall be based on the evidence entered into the record, and shall consider the arguments filed on brief. Arguments provided in comments may further inform the presiding officer's decision, but are not required to be addressed in the intermediate decision.
( c ) Intermediate decisions shall be filed in the docket and served on all parties. Intermediate decisions shall be part of the record of the proceeding.
( d ) Intermediate decisions are subject to review by the Commission and subject to challenge by parties to the proceeding through the filing of exceptions pursuant to § 3010.336. After review and consideration of the exceptions filed, intermediate decisions may be adopted by the Commission, in whole or in part, as part of the final decision in the proceeding.
( e ) ( 1 ) The Commission may, at any time, direct the omission of an intermediate decision and the certification of the record for the Commission's consideration sitting *en banc.* Parties to a proceeding may, by motion, request the omission of an intermediate decision and the certification of the record for the Commission's consideration sitting *en banc.* Motions shall specify: ( i ) The concurrence of other parties; and
( ii ) Whether opportunity for filing briefs or presenting oral argument to the Commission is desired or waived.
( 2 ) Failure of any party to object to such request shall constitute a waiver of any objections. Motions shall be filed no later than the deadline for the filing of briefs. In either instance, the decision to omit an intermediate decision shall be based upon the consideration of the novelty of the matters before the Commission, and the timely and efficient operation of the docket.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.776 Security Zone; Coast Guard Base San Juan, San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: All waters from surface to bottom, encompassed by an imaginary line connecting the following points, beginning at 18°27′39′′ N, 066°06′56′′ W; then east to Point 2 at 18°27′39′′ N, 066°06′52′′ W; then south to Point 3 at 18°27′35′′ N, 066°06′52′′ W; then southwest to Point 4 at 18°27′30′′ N, 066°06′59′′ W; then northeast to Point 5 at 18°27′25′′ N, 066°07′07′′ W; then north to Point 6 at 18°27′46′′ N, 066°07′10′′ W; then back to shore at the northwest end of the CG facility at Point 7 at 18°27′46′′ N, 066°07′07′′ W. These coordinates are based upon North American Datum 1983.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section— *Vessel* means every description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water, except U.S. Coast Guard or U.S. naval vessels.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) No person or vessel may enter into the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of the Port San Juan.
( 2 ) Vessels seeking to enter the security zone established in this section may contact the COTP on VHF channel 16 or by telephone at (787) 289-2041 to request permission.
[USCG-2008-0440, 74 FR 9769, Mar. 6, 2009]
- 1

- Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

s ascha.vanderbellen@ delta .com

June 12 , 201 4

via email and regulations.gov

Brett Kruger

Acting Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) TBK

For HND

- SEA and HND

- LAX Codesharing

Docket s DOT

- OST

- 201 4

- 0091

Dear Mr. Kruger :

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carrier s on the service list to the above

referenced application and t here are no objec tions. In these circumstances, we urge that the

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT

Bob Finamore , DOT

info@airlineinfo.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-22351-GAYLES

CHRIS KOSACHUK,

Plaintiff,

v.

LIZA HAZAN,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER OF TRANSFER

GOOD CAUSE appearing that a transfer of this cause is appropriate pursuant to S.D. Fla. 

L.R. 3.8 (citing §2.15.00 of the Court’s Internal Operating Procedures), due to the earlier-filed

case 22-cv-21485-RNS, and subject to the consent of the Honorable Robert N. Scola, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above styled cause is hereby transferred to the 

Honorable Robert N. Scola for all further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 28th day of July 2022.

____________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-22351-RNS Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

After reviewing the Court file in the above styled cause, the undersigned hereby accepts

the transfer of this action. Therefore, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all proceedings hereinafter shall bear Case No. 22-

cv-22351-RNS, thereby indicating the judge to whom all pleadings should be routed. 

THE FOREGOING transfer is herewith accepted this 28th day of July 2022. 

____________________________

ROBERT N. SCOLA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-22351-RNS Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37526-37530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15082]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 00-33]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub.L. 104-164 dated July 
1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 00-33 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification and Section 620(C)(d) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
1961.

    Dated: June 9, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[[Page 37527]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15JN00.001


[[Page 37528]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15JN00.002


[[Page 37529]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15JN00.003


[[Page 37530]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15JN00.004

[FR Doc. 00-15082 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos.  333-45456 and  333-63626)  pertaining  to the Virage,  Inc. 1995
Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and
the 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan of our report dated April 12, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of Virage,  Inc.
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2002.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
June 12, 2002

                                       83