alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5234

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Received

AN ACT

To amend the Hmong Veterans’ Naturalization Act of 2000

to extend the applicability of that Act to certain former

spouses of deceased Hmong veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 5234 RDS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HMONG VETERANS’ NATU2 RALIZATION ACT OF 2000 TO CERTAIN

3 FORMER SPOUSES OF DECEASED HMONG

4 VETERANS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2 of the Hmong Veterans’

6 Naturalization Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–207; 114

7 Stat. 316; 8 U.S.C. 1423 note) is amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the

9 end;

10 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new

13 paragraph:

14 ‘‘(3) who—

15 ‘‘(A) satisfies the requirement of para16 graph (1)(A); and

17 ‘‘(B) is the surviving spouse of a person

18 described in paragraph (1)(B) which described

19 person was killed or died in Laos, Thailand, or

20 Vietnam.’’.

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3 of such

22 Act is amended by striking ‘‘or (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘, (2),

23 or (3)’’.

24 SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION.

25 Section 6 of such Act is amended by adding at the

26 end the following new sentence: ‘‘In the case of a person
3

HR 5234 RDS

1 described in section 2(3), the application referred to in the

2 preceding sentence, and appropriate fees, shall be filed not

3 later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of

4 this sentence.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 25,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00307-CR

Jamar Conrad Chambers, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 60866, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Jamar Conrad Chambers seeks to appeal a judgment of conviction for aggravated

robbery with a deadly weapon. The trial court has certified that: (1) this is a plea bargain case and

Chambers has no right of appeal, and (2) Chambers waived the right of appeal. The appeal is

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

___________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 10, 2008

Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Form 10-Q for September 30, 1995, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000066904
<NAME> MISSISSIPPI POWER CO
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      971,474
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      7,892
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         103,770
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        59,309
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,142,445
<COMMON>                                        37,691
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      179,734
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            161,395
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 378,820
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     74,414
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           261,263
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              29,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       57,070
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                 (22,080)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 363,958
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,142,445
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      395,195
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            29,396
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     299,360
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     328,756
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         66,439
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,902
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  69,341
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        19,500
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,841
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,674
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   46,167
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        29,100
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          93,202
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Appendix C.12 - Sample AmeriCorps Seniors FGP-SCP Physical Exam Form

# Appendix C.12 – Sample AmeriCorps Seniors FGP-SCP Physical Exam Form

**AmeriCorps Seniors**

**Foster Grandparent/Senior Companion Program**

[Address]

 [Phone/Cell Number]

[Fax/Email]

**Physical Exam Form**

Name_____________________________________________   Date of Birth________________

Address_______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________

Phone #:_______________________________ Email: _________________________________

This form verifies that a volunteer with AmeriCorps Seniors Foster Grandparent Program or Senior Companion Program has been given a physical examination.

______________________________________________________________________________

Health Professional Signature						Date

______________________________________________________________________________     

Hospital/Clinic/Organization Name  					 Date****

Version 2020.3		Pg. 1 of 1

*This document is provided as a sample ONLY. Its use is optional and, if used, it should be customized as appropriate. For all appendices, including editable versions of samples and templates, visit**https://www.nationalservice.gov/operations-handbook-appendices.*
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 22, 2013

No. 04-13-00240-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.A.M.

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1995-CI-13100

Honorable Jim Rausch, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

LACK OF JURISDICTION.

We ORDER costs of the appeal taxed against appellant Linda E. Moreno.

It is so ORDERED on May 22, 2013.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of May, 2013.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14648]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Determination of Quarterly Rate of Excise Tax for Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Annuity Program

    In adcordance with directions in Section 3221(c) of the Railroad 
Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C., Section 3221(c)), the Railroad 
Retirement Board has determined that the excise tax imposed by such 
Section Section 3221(c) on every employer, with respect to having 
individuals in his employ, for each work-hour for which compensation is 
paid by such employer for services rendered to him during the quarter 
beginning July 1, 2000, shall be at the rate of 26\1/2\ cents.
    In accordance with directions in Section 15(a) of the Railroad 
Retirement Act of 1974, the Railroad Retirement Board has determined 
that for the quarter beginning July 1, 2000, 37.7 percent of the taxes 
collected under Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) of the Railroad Retirement 
Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad Retirement Account and 62.3 
percent of the taxes collected under such Sections 3211(b) and 3221(c) 
plus 100 percent of the taxes collected under Section 3221(d) of the 
Railroad Retirement Tax Act shall be credited to the Railroad 
Retirement Supplemental Account.


    Dated: June 1, 2000.
    By Authority of the Board.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-14648 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CONSOLIDATED ACTION

CASE NO. 22-61611-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

JOELLA R. TILLERY,

Plaintiff,

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_______________________________/ 

CASE NO. 22-61858-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

ELISABETH HERNANDEZ-DIAS,

Plaintiff,

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, JOELLA R. TILLERY, and Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

through their respective undersigned counsel, respectfully submit a joint motion to dismiss with 

prejudice. Plaintiff Tillery filed her Amended Complaint [D.E. 6] pursuant to the Federal Tort 

Claims Act (“FTCA”) alleging that she suffered injuries from a car accident with the United States 

Postal Service. Plaintiff Tillery and Defendant have reached an agreement to settle this case and 

have formally executed a settlement agreement.

Case 0:22-cv-61611-WPD Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2023 Page 1 of 2
Pursuant to S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(3), Defendant’s counsel attempted to contact Plaintiff 

Hernandez-Dias’s counsel, Peter Somera, via email on Tuesday, October 31, 2023, Wednesday, 

November 1, 2023, and orally, by leaving a message with his paralegal, on Thursday, November 

2, 2023, to obtain Plaintiff Hernandez-Dias’s position on the relief requested herein. However, 

Defendant’s counsel could not reach Mr. Somera. 

WHEREFORE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Tillery and Defendant

respectfully request that the Court dismiss all Plaintiff Tillery’s claims in this matter with prejudice 

pursuant to the parties’ settlement, with each party to bear its own costs and fees.

Respectfully Submitted, 

Irwin Ast, Esq. 

Leonard M. Caracappa, Esq. (FBN 1018504) 

Law Office of Irwin Ast 

2121 S.W. 3rd Avenue, Suite 401 

Miami, Florida 33129 

Tel: (305) 307-5208 

Fax: (305) 901-5639

irwin@astlawfirm.com 

leo@astlawfirm.com 

pleadings@astlawfirm.com 

(Counsel for Plaintiff Tillery)

By: /s/ Irwin Ast

IRWIN AST, ESQ.

FBN: 59879

Markenzy LaPointe, Esq.

United States Attorney

Jason A. Reding, Esq.

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

Southern District of Florida

99 NE 4th Street, Suite 300

Miami, FL 33132-211

Telephone: (305) 961-9202

Email: Jason.Reding@usdoj.gov

(Counsel for Defendant)

By: /s/ Jason A. Reding

JASON A. REDING, ESQ.

FBN: 56876

Case 0:22-cv-61611-WPD Document 31 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2023 Page 2 of 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5110

To designate the United States courthouse located at 3470 12th Street

in Riverside, California, as the ‘‘George E. Brown, Jr. United States

Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2000

Mr. CALVERT (for himself, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mrs. BONO, Mr. PACKARD, and Mr. BACA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 3470

12th Street in Riverside, California, as the ‘‘George E.

Brown, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse located at 3470 12th

5 Street in Riverside, California, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘George E. Brown, Jr. United States

7 Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 5110 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘George E. Brown, Jr. United

6 States Courthouse’’.

Æ
Speaker Request Form 

Thank you for your interest in having an expert from the Nutrition and Aging Resource Center (NRCNA) 

speak at your event! To facilitate your request, please complete and submit the following form (and 

any attachments) to at least 90 days prior to the event. Note that we do our best to 

accommodate as many requests as possible, but we cannot guarantee a speaker is available for all 

requests. 

nrcna@iowa.gov

If you have questions or need help completing the Speaker Request Form, please email nrcna@iowa.gov. 

Event Details 

Coordinator or Point of Contact (Name, Title, Email, Phone):

Name of Organization Submitting Request: 

Organization Website: 

Event Title: 

Event Location: 

Event Date/Time: 

Event Type (conference, small group, etc.): 

Event Purpose/Goal:

Event Website (if applicable): 

Speaker Request/Presentation Details: 

Requested Topic area and how NRCNA speaker would enhance your event:

Presentation format (keynote address, roundtable, panel, etc): 

In-person or virtual: 

Expected duration: 

Will the presentation be recorded? 

When do you need to hear back from the NRCNA? 
 Audience Details: 

Audience Size: 

Audience Composition: 

Healthcare professionals 

Local Service Providers 

Senior Center 

Professionals within the aging network 

State Units on Aging 

Area Agencies on Aging 

Other 

How did you hear about the Nutrition and Aging Resource Center? 

Additional Information: 

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the U.S. Administration for Community Living, Department of Health and Human 

Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and 

conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official ACL policy.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15058]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 00-08]


Safmarine Container Lines N.V. and Safmarine and CMBT Lines N.V. 
(SCL) Trading as CMBT v. Garden State Spices, Inc.; Notice of Filing of 
Compliant and Assignment

June 8, 2000.
    Notice is given that a complaint was filed by Safmarine Container 
Lines N.V. (``Safmarine'') and Safmarine and CMBT Lines N.V. (SCL) 
trading as CMBT (``CMBT'') (``Complainants'') against Garden State 
Spices, Inc. (``Respondent''). Complainants allege that Respondent 
violated section 10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. app. 
1709(a)(1), by knowingly and willfully obtaining transportation for 
property at less than the properly applicable rates and charges by 
unjust and unfair devices or means in connection with five shipments 
carried on a freight collect basis from J.N. Port, India, to New York. 
Complainants contend that Respondent induced Complainants to relinquish 
their possessory lien on the cargoes at the port of discharge, based on 
Respondent tendering checks represented to be full payment of the 
collect freight and charges, which subsequently ``bounced'' due to 
insufficient funds, all to the detrimental reliance of Complainants.
    Complainants state that they have been injured to their damage in 
the sum of $10,625. Complainants request that the Respondent be 
required to answer these charges; that after due hearing, an order be 
made commanding Respondents to pay reparations of $10,625 with interest 
from the respective dates of injury and attorney's fees or such other 
sum as the Commission may determine to be proper as an award of 
reparation.
    This proceeding has been assigned to the office of Administrative 
Law Judges. Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence 
within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after 
consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer 
to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing 
shall include oral testimony and cross-examination in the discretion of 
the presiding officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine 
issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn 
statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the 
nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and cross-
examination are necessary for the development of an adequate record. 
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of 
the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by June 8, 
2001, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by 
October 9, 2001.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15058 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5288

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase

the minimum payment amount to Medicare+Choice organizations offering Medicare+Choice plans to correct inequities in amounts paid in

rural and urban areas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2000

Mr. SHERWOOD (for himself, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, and Mr.

MINGE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act

to increase the minimum payment amount to

Medicare+Choice organizations offering

Medicare+Choice plans to correct inequities in amounts

paid in rural and urban areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5288 IH

1 SECTION 1. INCREASING FLOOR TO 75 PERCENT OF MAX2 IMUM RATE.

3 Section 1853(c)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42

4 U.S.C. 1395w–23(c)(1)(B)) is amended—

5 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘For a succeeding

6 year,’’ and inserting ‘‘For 1999 and 2000,’’; and

7 (2) by adding at the end the following new

8 clause:

9 ‘‘(iii) For 2001 and each succeeding

10 year, 75 percent of the largest annual

11 Medicare+Choice capitation rate under

12 this paragraph for any Medicare+Choice

13 payment area for the year involved (but

14 not to exceed, in the case of an area out15 side the 50 States and the District of Co16 lumbia, 150 percent of the annual per cap17 ita rate of payment for 1997 determined

18 under section 1876(a)(1)(C) for the

19 area).’’.

Æ
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2003 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 of AMERCO
(the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 4, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Jason A. Berg, Chief Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:







(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




AMERCO,




a Nevada
corporation





/s/ Jason A.
Berg




Jason A.
Berg


Chief
Accounting Officer


Date:
February 4, 2009
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no pre cedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 94-20651 Summary Calendar

_____________________

IN THE MATTER OF: TIGHE ANTHONY and

NANCY LEE MERELLI,

Debtors.

FRANK MCINTYRE,

Appellant,

v.

NANCY LEE MERELLI and TIGHE ANTHONY,

Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CA H 94 1752)

_________________________________________________________________ (April 14, 1995)

Before KING, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The district court correctly dismissed appellant Frank

McIntyre's appeal. The bankruptcy court judgment appealed from was

entered on October 23, 1992. Under Bankruptcy Rule 8002, a notice2

of appeal must be filed within ten days of the date of entry of the

judgment. The ten-day period may be extended once, for a maximum

of twenty days, upon a showing of excusable neglect. McIntyre's

motion for leave to appeal was filed more than five months after

the entry of judgment by the bankruptcy court. McIntyre argued

that he lacked actual notice of the entry of the bankruptcy court's

judgment. But, as the district court correctly pointed out,

McIntyre's lack of notice of the entry of judgment is irrelevant.

Under Bankruptcy Rule 9022, lack of notice of the entry of a court

order does not affect the time to appeal or authorize the court to

relieve a party for failure to file a timely appeal. We agree with

the district court that Bankruptcy Rule 9022 should be construed in

the same manner as Fed. R. Crim. P. 49(b) , i.e., it is mandatory

and precludes out-of-time appeals. See U nited States v. Awalt

, 728

F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir. 1984).

The district court's order dismissing McIntyr e's appeal is

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of National Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carol
Boozer, Vice President and Principal Financial Officer, of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:    April 15, 2003                        /s/ Carol Boozer
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Carol Boozer
                                               Vice President and Principal
                                               Financial Officer