alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5307 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5307

  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a feasibility 
  study on water optimization in the Burnt River basin, Malheur River 
       basin, Owyhee River basin, and Powder River basin, Oregon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2000

Mr. Walden of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a feasibility 
  study on water optimization in the Burnt River basin, Malheur River 
       basin, Owyhee River basin, and Powder River basin, Oregon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Burnt, Malheur, Owyhee, and Powder 
River Basin Water Optimization Feasibility Study Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. STUDY.

    The Secretary of the Interior may conduct a feasibility study on 
water optimization in the Burnt River basin, Malheur River basin, 
Owyhee River basin, and Powder River basin, Oregon.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary 
to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 5.22 Assignment to duties.

Members of the Auxiliary will not be assigned duties until they have been found to be competent to perform such duties and have been designated by authority of the Commandant to perform such duties.
Exhibit 32
Chief Executive and Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  Chief  Executive and
Financial  Officer of Senior Optician  Service,  Inc., (the  "Company"),  hereby
certify that,  to the best of my knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: June 14, 2004


                                            By: /s/ Donald Hill
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Donald Hill
                                               Chief Executive/Financial Officer
§ 133.19 Recordkeeping. ( a ) The State official shall maintain detailed records of expenditures made from the funds provided under this part, including records of— ( 1 ) Daily expenditures for each individual worker, giving the individual's name, title or position, activity performed, time on task, salary or hourly rate, travel costs, per diem, out-of-pocket or extraordinary expenses, and whether the individual is normally available for oil spill removal;
( 2 ) Equipment purchased or rented each day, with the daily or hourly rate;
( 3 ) Miscellaneous materials and expendables purchased each day; and
( 4 ) Daily contractor or consultant fees, including costs for their personnel and contractor-owned or rented equipment, as well as that of any subcontractor.
( b ) The State official shall submit a copy of these records and a summary document stating the total of all expenditures made to the NPFC official specified in § 133.25(c) within thirty days after completion of the removal actions. A copy of these documents shall also be submitted to the cognizant OSC.
( c ) Upon request of the OSC or the NPFC, the State official shall make the original records available for inspection.
( d ) If, after inspecting the records, the Director, NPFC, determines that expenditures by a State official from funds obligated under this part were not eligible for funding under this part and the expenditures were not made with the good faith understanding that they were eligible under this part, the Director, NPFC, may seek reimbursement to the Fund from the State.
#### § 101-26.101 Utilization of long supply and excess personal property.

To the fullest extent practicable, agencies shall utilize inventories in long supply, as prescribed in subpart 101-27.3, and excess personal property, as prescribed in part 101-43, as a first source of supply in fulfilling their requirements.

[34 FR 200, Jan. 7, 1969]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Humatech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David G.
      Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  May
                5, 2006
            /s/
                David G. WilliamsBy:  
                David G. WilliamsIts:   
                Chief Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Humatech, Inc. and will be retained by Humatech, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 175.19 Stowage. ( a ) No person may use a recreational boat unless each wearable PFD required by § 175.15 is readily accessible.
( b ) No person may use a recreational boat unless each throwable PFD required by § 175.15 is immediately available.
[USCG-2013-0263, 79 FR 56499, Sept. 22, 2014]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*



     In connection with the Amendment No.1 to Annual Report of SiVault Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Wayne Taylor, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





                                             /s/ Wayne Taylor
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Wayne Taylor,
                                             Interim Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  October 28, 2004
§ 3050.24 Documentation supporting estimates of costs avoided by worksharing and other mail characteristics in the Postal Service's section 3652 report. ( a ) The items in paragraphs (b) through (l) of this section shall be reported, including supporting calculations and derivations.
( b ) Letter, card, flat, parcel and non-flat machinable mail processing cost models with Delivery Point Sequence percentages calculated, which shall include: ( 1 ) Coverage factors for any equipment where coverage is less than 100 percent;
( 2 ) MODS productivities;
( 3 ) Piggyback factors and supporting data;
( 4 ) Entry profiles, bundle sorts, and pieces per bundle;
( 5 ) Bundle breakage, handlings, and density;
( 6 ) Mail flow density and accept rates;
( 7 ) Remote Computer Reader finalization costs, cost per image, and Remote Bar Code Sorter leakage;
( 8 ) Percentage of mail finalized to carrier route;
( 9 ) Percentage of mail destinating at post office boxes; and
( 10 ) Wage rates and premium pay factors.
( c ) Pallet cost models for Periodicals;
( d ) Sack cost models for Periodicals;
( e ) Bundle cost models for Periodicals;
( f ) Other container cost models for Periodicals;
( g ) Analysis of Periodicals container costs;
( h ) Business Reply Mail cost supporting material;
( i ) Mail processing units costs for Carrier Route, High Density, and Saturation mail;
( j ) Mail processing unit costs by shape and cost pool for each product and benchmark category;
( k ) Delivery costs by product, shape, presort level, automation compatibility, and machinability, including Detached Address Label cost calculations; and
( l ) Dropship cost avoidance models.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

OFFICE OF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 

WESTERN ECOLOGY DIVISION 

200 S.W. 35TH STREET, CORVALLIS, OR 97333

September 10, 2014

«Address_1» «Address_2»

«City_», «State_» «Zip»

«GreetingLine»

I am writing to ask you for your help in understanding how residents of Oregon feel about the 

protection of salmon and steelhead fish populations in the Willamette basin. In the next few

days you will receive a request to participate in this project by answering questions about your 

thoughts and opinions on protecting salmon and steelhead fish populations in the Willamette 

basin. Even if you are not familiar with salmon and steelhead populations in the Willamette 

basin, by taking a few minutes to share your thoughts and opinions on this topic, you will be 

helping us out a great deal.

We would like to do everything we can to make it easy and enjoyable for your to participate 

in this study. I am writing in advance because many people like to know ahead of time that 

they will be asked to fill out a survey. This research can only be successful with the generous 

help of people like you.

The survey should take about 20 – 30 minutes to complete. We cannot send the survey to 

everyone, so your answers will represent the opinions of other Oregon residents who are similar 

to you and your household. I hope that you can find this amount of time to help with our 

project. Most of all, I hope that you enjoy the survey and the opportunity to voice your

thoughts and opinions on this important subject.

Best wishes,

Dr. Michael Papenfus

United States Environmental Protection Agency
1

1

i

IN THEUNITED STATESDISTRICTCOURTFORTHE

SOUTHERN PI ISTRICTOFFLORIDA

I

DONALD J.TRUMP, r

2

Plaintiy No.9:22-cv-81294-AMC

V .

Dated:August25,2022

UN ITED STA TESOF AM ERICA ,

JURYTRIALDEM ANDED

Defendant

N O TICE OF A PPEA M N CE

1,T.E.,T.ERajK.Patel,theplaintiff(prose),w11representmyself,andIhereby

entermyappearancewith theCourt:

1. M ystreetandm ailingaddressarethesam e:

6850East21stStreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

2. Iam ableto and willing toappeareitherin person orovercom puterorm obile

device.

3. Iam initiatinganintervention.

4. Iwillacceptservicebye-mailateitherrajpzolo@gmail.com orraj@rajpatel.live.

5. IwillacceptnoticesbyECFnodfication.

6. IfIdeddetoberepresentedbyan attom ey in theftture,eitherm y attom ey orl

willnotifytheCourtofthechangeIM MEDIATELY.

Respectfullysubmitted,

/s/RajK.Patel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(prose)

FILED BY D

.C.

ALC 262222

CALNEGRKEGUSE. NOBLE

s DISICX .o.oF/1..:.-w.eB.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 1 of 3
i(

6850East24ststeet

Indianapoli,s,I'N 46219

M arionCotmty

317-450-6651(ce11)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

- 2-

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 2 of 3
:

I

i

CERTIFICATE OF SERV ICE

. 1

IcertifythatIservedacopyoftheforejoingRajK.Patel's(ProSe)NodceofAppearance

on08/25/2022tobelow indiyidualsviathee-mail,consistentwiththeLocalRules:

:

JamesM .Trusty

T RAH ,PLLC

1717Pennsylve aAvenue,NW ,Suite650

W ashingtonzDC 20006

202-852-5669

Email:jtrusty@ifrahlaw.com

LindseyHalligan

511SE51 Avenue

FortLauderdalezFlorida33301

lindseyhalligan@otttlookcom

720-435-2870

Em ail:lindseyhalligan@ym ail.com

M .Evan Corcoran

Silverm an,Thompson,Slutkin,& W hite,LLC

400EastPrattStreet,Suite900

Balfim ore,M D 21230

410-385-2225

Em ail:ecorcorr @silverm anthom pson.com

Dated:August25,2022

Respectfullysubm itted,

/s/RajPatel -

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(Pr0Se)

6850East21stStreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

317-450-6651(cel1)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 22-20257-CR-MARTINEZ/BECERRA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ, 

Defendant. 

I -----------

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

THE MATTER was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra 

and accordingly, a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 71] was filed on February 3, 2023, 

with a Recommendation Granting [ECF No. 57], Defendant's Motion for Investigative Costs, 

submitted by CJA Attorney Michael G. Smith, Esq. 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline 

Becerra's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 71] is hereby AFFIRMED and 

ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendant Rodriguez's Motion for Investigative Costs [ECF No. 

57] is GRANTED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this .:2.2<lay of February 2023. 

Copies provided to: 

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra 

All Counsel of Record 

CJA Administrator 

JOSE . MARTINEZ 

UNIT D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:22-cr-20257-JEM Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2023 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-30180

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

ROT VAN NGUYEN, 

also known as Minh Dung, also known as Minh Dung Duong,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

No. 2:18-CR-28-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rot Van Nguyen has 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-30180 Document: 00515172259 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/24/2019
No. 19-30180

2

moved to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 

2011). Nguyen has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-30180 Document: 00515172259 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/24/2019
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6**  **180**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TERESA R. GALLOP, a/k/a Teresa R. Vick , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Co urt for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Henry Coke Morgan , Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 2:08

- cr - 00217

- HCH

- TEM

- 1; 2:10

- cv - 00572

- HCM )

Submitted : April 1 9, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Teresa R. Gallop , Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Lee Martin, Alan Mark Salsbury , Assistant United States Attorney s , Norfolk, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this c ircuit.2 PER CURIAM: Teresa R. Gallop seeks to appeal the district cou rt’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gallop has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 con tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual Report of Caprock  Canyon  Investments,
Inc.,  on Form  10-KSB for the year ending  December  31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned,  Andrey Luzgin,  Chief Executive  Officer and Principal  Accounting
Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2005


/s/ Andrey Luzgin
Andrey Luzgin
CEO, CFO, Chairman, Secretary, Director
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### §§ 101-28.203-2-101-28.203-3 [Reserved]
#### § 80.510 Chesapeake Bay Entrance, VA.

A line drawn from Cape Charles Light to Cape Henry Light.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. DAR IO LOPEZ-ARELLANO, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10560

D.C . No. 2:12-c r-00421-GM N M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da Gloria M . Nava rro, C hie f Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d August 13, 2014 ** B e fore : SC HR O EDER , THOM AS, and HUR W ITZ, C i rc uit Judge s . Dario Lope z -Are lla

no a ppe a ls from the distric t

c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s the 41-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for be ing a de porte d a lie n found unla wfully in the Unite d

Stat e s, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED AUG 18 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Lope z -Are l la no c onte nds tha

t his se nte n c e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble in light of his unique

history an d

c ha ra c te ristic s. The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in im

posing Lope z -Are lla

no’ s se nte nc e . S

e e Gall v . Unite d State

s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The

se n t e nc e at the bottom

of the Guide l ine s ra

nge is substa ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the

18 U.S.C . § 3553(a ) se nte nc ing fa c tors a nd the t ota lity of the c irc um sta n c e s, inc luding Lope z -Are lla no’ s history

of drugre late d offe nse s. Se e id . AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 0 5 6 0 2
Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 1 of 3
Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 2 of 3
Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 33 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 3 of 3
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-0 9 -00 487 -CR

Wil lia m Be r r y P ie r c e , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF SAN SABA CO UNTY , 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 5581 , HO NORAB LE JAMES F. CLAWSO N JR. , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
On June 7, 20 10 , L ou Ann L ind e man Be rr y , co ur t r e po rt e r f

or the 33 rd Di str ic t Co ur

t, San Sa ba County , f ile d a n a ff ida vit in thi s Cour

t sta tin g that all co pie s of the re po rt e r’ s r e c or d in thi s
c a us e have e ith e r b e e n d e le te d o r d e str oy e d b y a c omp ute r v ir

us , th a t atte mpt s h ave bee n ma de to
rec over the rec ord fr om Be rry ’s computer, and that these attempts have bee n unsucce ssful. We then abate d this appeal to allow the tria l court to deter mine whether the repor

ter’s rec ord ca

n be re place d by ag ree ment of the pa

rties. See Tex. R. App. P . 34.6(f) (4). On Aug ust 23, 2010, we re ceive d a supplemental re cord c ontaining the trial court’ s findings that the repor ter’s r ecor d cannot be repla ced by ag ree ment of the pa

rties. B eca

use the lost or destroyed re cord c ontain s the entire ty of the appellant’ s trial, we conclude that the lost recor d is nece ssary to resolution of this appeal. See T e x. R. App. P
. 3 4
. 6 (f

)( 3 ). As a re sult, the appellant is entitled to a new tr ial. See Tex. R. App. P. 3 4. 6( f) . We re ve rs e the jud g me nt o f c onvic tio n a nd re mand thi s c a us e fo r a ne w tri a l.2 _________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___________ Diane M. H enson, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and He nson Reverse d and Remande d Filed: September

22, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh