alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 491.8 Execution of process. ( a ) All legal process in the nature of garnishment shall be date and time stamped by the Authorized Agent when received for the purpose of determining the order of receipt of process which is sufficient as to legal form and contains sufficient information for identification of the employee, the Authorized Agent's date and time stamp shall be conclusive evidence. Child support and alimony garnishments will be accorded priority over commercial garnishments under 5 U.S.C. 5520a as provided in 5 U.S.C. 5520a(h)(2). Garnishments shall be executed provided that the pay cycle is open for input or, if closed, will be held until the next cycle. In no event shall the Postal Service be required to vary its normal pay or disbursement cycles in order to comply with legal process of any kind. Garnishments shall be recalculated, if required, to fit within the normal postal pay cycles. The Postal Service shall not be required to withhold pay and hold the funds in escrow. The Postal Service, in its sole discretion, may process more than one garnishment at a time within the restrictions on garnishments in Section 491.9 of these regulations. The Postal Service may, in its sole discretion, accept and hold for processing garnishments received after the garnishment currently in force.
( b ) The Postal Service will only accept and effectuate legal process for a person who is currently employed. Upon cessation of employment, process relating to that individual will be terminated and not retained. The Postal Service shall not be required to establish an escrow account to comply with legal process even if the applicable law of the jurisdiction requires private employers to do so. Legal process must state on its face that the Postal Service withhold up to a specific total amount of money, the Postal Service will not calculate interest, charges, or any variable in processing a garnishment. The Postal Service may continue processing a garnishment if the garnishing attorney provides the adjusted total including the additional money owed, as determined from his calculation of the variable amounts. The attorney is deemed to certify on his professional responsibility that the calculations are correct and will indemnify the employee directly for any errors. All garnishments of periodic pay may be effectuated in accordance with the bi-weekly pay schedule. The Postal Service need not vary its pay and disbursement cycles to accommodate withholding on any other cycle.
( c ) Neither the Postal Service, the Postal Rate Commission nor any disbursing officer shall be liable for any payment made from moneys due from, or payable by the Postal Service or the Postal Rate Commission to any individual pursuant to legal process regular on its face.
( d ) The Postal Service, the Postal Rate Commission, any disbursing officer or any other employee shall not be liable to pay money damages for failure to comply with legal process.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                     11
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           11
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             11
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     370
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  750
<OTHER-SE>                                             (1,109)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               11
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        1,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (1,359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (1,359)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.00)



</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALVADOR GARCIA-TORRES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71932

Agency No. A098-952-250

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 10, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, HAWKINS, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Salvador Garcia-Torres, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for

cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

FILED

AUG 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71932

We lack jurisdiction over the agency’s discretionary determination that

Garcia-Torres failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a

qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.

2005). 

 Garcia-Torres’ contention that the agency deprived him of due process by

misapplying the law to the facts of his case does not state a colorable due process

claim. See id.

We lack jurisdiction to review Garcia-Torres’ contentions regarding asylum

and additional grounds of hardship not considered by the agency because he failed

to raise those arguments before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674,

678 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN PELESASA FUE, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

 v.

MARTIN BITER, Warden, 

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 12-55307

D.C. No. 

2:11-cv-02436-DMG-MRW

Central District of California, 

Los Angeles

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 

FILED

AUG 04 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5234 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5234

 To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the 
 applicability of that Act to certain former spouses of deceased Hmong 
                               veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2000

Mr. Radanovich (for himself, Mr. Rohrabacher, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Hunter, 
 Mr. Herger, Mr. Vento, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, and Mr. Dooley of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the 
 applicability of that Act to certain former spouses of deceased Hmong 
                               veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HMONG VETERANS' NATURALIZATION ACT OF 2000 TO 
              CERTAIN FORMER SPOUSES OF DECEASED HMONG VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization 
Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-207; 114 Stat. 316; 8 U.S.C. 1423 note) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) who--
                    ``(A) satisfies the requirement of paragraph 
                (1)(A); and
                    ``(B) is the surviving spouse of a person described 
                in paragraph (1)(B) which described person was killed 
                or died in Laos, Thailand, or Vietnam.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3 of such Act is amended by 
striking ``or (2)'' and inserting ``, (2), or (3)''.
    (c) Deadline for Application.--Section 6 of such Act is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``In the case of a person 
described in section 2(3), the application referred to in the preceding 
sentence, and appropriate fees, shall be filed not later than 18 months 
after the date of the enactment of this sentence.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of teleconference meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with § 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, the Federal Emergency Management Agency gives notice that the following meeting will be held:

*Name:*                             Technical Mapping Advisory Council.                         

*Date of Meeting:*                             June 26, 2000.                         

*Place:*                             The FEMA Conference Operator in Washington, DC will administer the teleconference. Individuals interested in participating should call 1-800-320-4330 at the time of the teleconference. Callers will be prompted for the conference code, #15, and they will then be connected through to the teleconference.                         

*Time:*                             2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., EST.                         

*Proposed Agenda:*

1. Call to order. 

2. Announcements. 

3. Action on minutes from June 1-2, 2000, meeting. 

4. Review draft annual report text. 

5. Discuss agenda for July 2000 meetings. 

6. New business. 

7. Adjournment. 

*Status:*                             This meeting is open to the public.                        

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Sally P. Magee, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., room 442, Washington, DC 20472, telephone (202) 646-8242 or by facsimile at (202) 646-4596. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available upon request 30 days after they have been approved by the next Technical Mapping Advisory Council meeting in July 2000. 

Dated: June 7, 2000.

Michael J. Armstrong, 

Associate Director for Mitigation.

[FR Doc. 00-15016 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-04-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley
D. Tilden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Bradley D. Tilden

Bradley D. Tilden
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002


                                       1
#### § 3055.5 Changes to measurement systems, service standards, service goals, or reporting methodologies.

The Postal Service shall file notice with the Commission describing all changes to measurement systems, service standards, service goals or reporting methodologies, including the use of proxies for reporting service performance, 30 days prior to planned implementation. The Commission may initiate a proceeding at any time to consider such changes if it appears that the changes might have a material impact on the accuracy, reliability, or utility of the reported measurement, or if the changes might have a material impact on the characteristics of the underlying product.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5298 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5298

    To amend title 18, United States Code, to create an offense of 
    solicitation or recruitment of persons in criminal street gang 
                               activity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2000

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to create an offense of 
    solicitation or recruitment of persons in criminal street gang 
                               activity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anti-Gang Violence Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. SOLICITATION OR RECRUITMENT OF PERSONS IN CRIMINAL STREET GANG 
              ACTIVITY.

    (a) Prohibited Conduct.--Chapter 26 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 522. Recruitment of persons to participate in criminal street 
              gang activity
    ``(a) Prohibited Conduct.--It shall be unlawful for any person, to 
use any facility in, or travel in, interstate or foreign commerce, or 
cause another to do so, to recruit, solicit, induce, command, or cause 
another person to be or remain as a member of a criminal street gang, 
or conspire to do so, with the intent that the person being recruited, 
solicited, induced, commanded, or caused to be or remain a member of 
such gang participate in an offense described in section 521(c).
    ``(b) Penalties.--Whoever violates subsection (a) shall--
            ``(1) be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined under 
        this title, or both; and
            ``(2) be liable for any costs incurred by the Federal 
        Government or by any State or local government for housing, 
        maintaining, and treating the minor until the minor attains the 
        age of 18 years.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Criminal street gang.--The term `criminal street 
        gang' has the meaning given the term in section 521.
            ``(2) Minor.--The term `minor' means a person who is 
        younger than 18 years of age.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 26 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``522. Recruitment of persons to participate in criminal street gang 
                            activity.''.
                                 <all>
```
May 22, 2015

Chris Kiefer 101 Northeast Brookwood Parkway #101 Hillsboro, OR 97124

Dear Mr. Chris Kiefer:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 7, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA2015-913), but we are unable to process your reque st any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-5   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 1
NO.03-1S-00362-CV

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
COLETTE CUSTER Appellant y. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Appellee.

APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING

APPELLANT'S BRIEF TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS! Colette Custer, Appellant, moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file Appellant's Brief, and respectfully states: 1. Appellant's Brief was due on September 10, 2015. 2.. Appellant seeks a tw~l~e day extension of time to file Appellant's Brief from the due date of the filing of the Brief, which would make Appellant's Brief due on or before September 23,2015. 4. This extension of time is necessary because Appel}ant could not complete her brief until the 23ndof September, 2015. 5. This is the second extension of time Appellant has sought for the filing her brief. For these reason, Colette Custer requests that this court render an order ACCEPTED 03-15-00362-CV 7069509 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/23/2015 5:36:25 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKextending thetime forfiling Appellant's Brief to and including September 23,

2015.
Colette Custer 20433 Rita Blanca Circle Pflugerville, Texas 78660

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE On September 22, 2015, an attempt was made to confer with Suzanne Suarez, attorney for the Appellee, in order to confer as to the extension but was unable to reached Ms. Suarez.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On September 23,2015, acopy ofthe attached motion for extension oftime was sent byU. S. Postal Service to: Suzanne Suarez P. O. Box 2869 Addison, Texas 75001 I



# {21/
Case 0:22-cv-61842-AHS   Document 1-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/03/2022   Page 1 of 1
§ 2.38 Waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; waters over which the United States has jurisdiction. *Waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States* and *waters over which the United States has jurisdiction* mean the following waters— ( a ) Navigable waters of the United States, as defined in § 2.36(a).
( b ) Waters, other than those under paragraph (a) of this section, that are located on lands for which the United States has acquired title or controls and— ( 1 ) Has accepted jurisdiction according to 40 U.S.C. 255; or
( 2 ) Has retained concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction from the date that the State in which the lands are located entered the Union.
( c ) Waters made subject to the jurisdiction of the United States by operation of the international agreements and statutes relating to the former Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and waters within the territories and possessions of the United States.