alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
531 P.2d 234

#### Roy MAYS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles C. KAST and Virginia R. Kast, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 11512.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Jan. 24, 1975.

Francis H. Hicks, Hicks & Kevan, Mountain Home, for plaintiff-appellant.

Webb, Pike, Burton & Carlson, Twin Falls, Gary W. Shaw of Becker, Swenson & Shaw, Gooding, for defendants-respondents.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants-respondents Kast in an action brought by Plaintiff-Appellant Roy Mays to collect moneys allegedly due under an oral contract for construction of a concrete pit for the storage of corn silage. The Kasts refused to pay and defended the action on the basis that a portion of the pit collapsed due to improper design and faulty materials. Mays, on the other hand, claimed the collapse was due to improper actions of the Kasts.

The trial court found that Mays had breached an implied warranty of fitness thus entitling Kast to a set-off of $5,000. Judgment was entered for Mays for the sum due under the contract, less the $5,000 set-off. There is no claim here that the trial court incorrectly applied the law of implied warranty of fitness, Bethlahmy v. Bechtel, 91 Idaho 55, 415 P.2d 698 (1966), but rather the assignments of error challenge the factual findings of the court as being unsupported by the evidence. We *473have reviewed the record and find that there is substantial although conflicting evidence to support the trial court’s finding. Planting v. Board of County Commissioners of Ada County, 95 Idaho 484, 511 P.2d 301 (1973).

Judgment affirmed. Costs to respondents.
Exhibit 99.2


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allen Organ
Company (the "Company") on form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nathan S.
Eckhart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and result
     of operations of the Company.



/s/ Nathan S. Eckhart
Nathan S. Eckhart
Chief Financial Officer
August 7, 2002
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

# A P

R1 9 

# 2 0

11 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION Mr. Michael A. Nash Associate General Counsel, U.S. Business Operations P.O. Box 33428 St. Paul, Minnesota 55133 Dear Mr
.Nash: Thank you for your letter ofJanuary 28, 2011 , to Administrator Jackson in which you submitted a Petition for Administrative Reconsideration on behalfof3M Company (3M). In the petition, 3M seeks reconsideration ofthe reporting requirements for fluorinated greenhouse gases (GHGs) used as heat transfer fluids (HTFs) under SubpartI ofthe recently finalized Mandatory Reporting ofGreenhouse Gases: Additional Sources ofFluorinated GHGs. 3M's main concern, as detailed in your letter, is that as the rule is currently written, the reporting requirements for HTFs will exclude a significantportion offluorinated GHGs used as HTFs in electronics manufacturing
. As a result, according to your letter, the GHG emissions associated with HTFs will not be accurately reported under the rule
. We understand the concerns that you raise in your letter regarding the potential exclusion ofcertain fluorinated HTFs from reporting ul)der Subpart I of40 CFR Part 98, and we appreciate your bringing this important issue to our attention. Receiving data on emissions from the use of fluorinated HTFs will provide the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with comprehensive information on all emissions, including quantities and sources from electronics manufacturing facilities. EPA did not intend to exclude a significant portion offluorinated GHGs used as HTFs from the monitoring and reporting requirements in Subpart I; any such exclusion was inadvertent. For this reason, we are committed to revisiting the issue and evaluating what revisions the Agency could propose for Subpart I to ensure that fluorinated HTFs used in electronics manufacturing are appropriately monitored and reported. EPA views such data on the emissions offluorinated HTFs as an important component in improving future efforts to characterize GHG emissions from the electronics manufacturing sector.

Intemet Address (URL)
_ http://www
.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable
_ Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% POSlconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperAgain, thank you for bringing this important issue to our attention. We will be in contact with you as we moveJorward to address the issue ofreporting fluorinated GHGs used and HTFs in Subpart I of40 CFRPart 98. Ifyou have any questions in the meantime, please contact Paul Gunning in the Climate Change Division at (202) 343-9736. Sincerely,

ina McCarthy Assistant Administrator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23354-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

PALMETTO EKG & ECHO READERS,

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF FLORIDA,

INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER STAYING AND CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Joint Motion for Temporary Stay of 

Proceedings Pending Settlement, ECF No. [9] (“Motion”), filed on November 4, 2022. For good 

cause shown, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion, ECF No. [9], is GRANTED.

2. The above-styled action is STAYED and administratively CLOSED without prejudice 

to the parties to file appropriate dismissal documentation.

3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only.

4. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, all 

pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines are TERMINATED.

5. Either party may move to reopen the case at any time.

6. Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand, ECF No. [8], is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

to Plaintiff refiling it should the parties fail to reach a full settlement. 

Case 1:22-cv-23354-BB Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-23354-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on November 7, 2022.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23354-BB Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 101-39.206 Seasonal or unusual requirements.

Agencies or activities having seasonal, peak, or unusual requirements for vehicles or related services shall inform the GSA IFMS fleet management center as far in advance as possible. Normally, notice shall be given not less than 3 months in advance of the need. Requests for vehicles for other than indefinite assignment will usually be filled for agencies participating fully with the GSA IFMS, provided resources permit. Other than fully participating agencies will normally not be accommodated for seasonal, peak, or unusual vehicle requirements.

[56 FR 59889, Nov. 26, 1991]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5309 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5309

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2305 Minton Road in West Melbourne, Florida, as the ``Ronald W. 
                     Reagan Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2000

Mr. Weldon of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2305 Minton Road in West Melbourne, Florida, as the ``Ronald W. 
                     Reagan Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RONALD W. REAGAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2305 Minton Road in West Melbourne, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Ronald W. Reagan Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Ronald W. 
Reagan Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 101-26.507-4 Quantities in excess of the maximum order limitation.

Quantities exceeding the maximum order limitation on Federal Supply Schedules will also be consolidated and procured by GSA pursuant to § 101-26.507-2. Where quantities are required to be delivered before the time frames established for the quarterly consolidated procurement, the requisition must indicate the earlier required delivery. As necessary, separate procurement action will be taken by GSA to satisfy the requirements.

[41 FR 34632, Aug. 16, 1976]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE
30, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,455,407
<SECURITIES>                                18,301,176
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,920,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                   384,597
<INVENTORY>                                 19,644,982
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,106,642
<PP&E>                                      24,723,256
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,395,536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,036,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,520,777
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,537,993
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,655,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,036,208
<SALES>                                     35,739,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,739,767
<CGS>                                       21,034,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,034,444
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,908,441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,357,047
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,131,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,226,047
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,226,047
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.90


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-45456) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock Option
Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Virage, Inc. of our report dated
April 13, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Virage, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended March 31, 2001.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


San Jose, California
June 19, 2001
#### § 101-26.607-1 Payments.

Payments are expected to be made within 15 calendar days of receipt of the Standard Form 1080 from the Defense supply centers. Payment shall not be deferred until receipt of shipment or withheld pending resolution of adjustments.

[42 FR 58750, Nov. 11, 1977]
#### § 946.7 Submission of claims.

Claims submitted pursuant to this part must be submitted on Postal Service Form 1503 which may be obtained from the Inspector in Charge who has custody of the property.
IB

House Calendar No. 291

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5267

[Report No. 106–921]

To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 Federal Plaza

in Central Islip, New York, as the ‘‘Theodore Roosevelt United States

Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 22, 2000

Mr. LAZIO (for himself, Mr. KING, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. REYNOLDS, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. HINCHEY, Mrs. MCCARTHY of

New York, Mr. WALSH, Mr. OWENS, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. MCNULTY,

Mrs. KELLY, and Mrs. MALONEY of New York) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Additional sponsors: Mr. MCHUGH and Mr. SWEENEY

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 100

Federal Plaza in Central Islip, New York, as the ‘‘Theodore Roosevelt United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5267 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 100 Federal

3 Plaza in Central Islip, New York, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Theodore Roosevelt United States Court5 house’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Theodore Roosevelt United

11 States Courthouse’’.

House Calendar No. 291

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5267

[Report No. 106–921]

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located

at 100 Federal Plaza in Central Islip, New York,as the ‘‘Theodore Roosevelt United States Courthouse’’.

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 101-27.102-1 Applicability.

All executive agencies, except the Department of Defense, within the United States, excluding Alaska and Hawaii, shall replenish inventories of stock items having recurring demands, except items held at points of final use, in accordance with the economic order quantity (EOQ) principle.

[29 FR 15997, Dec. 1, 1964]
**Exhibit23.1**

**CONSENTOF E. PHILLIP BAILEY, CPA**

We consent to theincorporation by reference of VuBotics, Inc. (the “Company”) of our reportdated June 12, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements of theCompany included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) of the Company for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006, including the consolidated balance sheetof Vubotics, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows forthe year ended December 31, 2005.
| /s/ E. PHILLIP BAILEY, CPA |   |
|----------------------------|--------|

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Keith Guelpa, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|    |  |                                       
|--- |  | --------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ R. Keith Guelpa                   
|    |  | R. Keith Guelpa                       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
March 29, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-23639-GAYLES/TORRES

SHAKELIA MONIQUE JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant. 

________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of 

Judgment Under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with Remand of the Cause to the Defendant

(“Motion”) [ECF No. 14]. The action was referred to Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres, 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for a ruling on all pretrial, non-dispositive matters, and for a 

Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. [ECF No. 2]. On March 15, 2023, Judge 

Torres issued his Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that Defendant’s

Unopposed Motion be granted. [ECF No. 15].

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which 

objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings 

that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see 

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific 

objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint 

Case 1:22-cv-23639-DPG Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 

208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). 

Having reviewed the Report for clear error, the Court agrees with Judge Torres’s wellreasoned analysis and conclusion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) Chief Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres’s Report and Recommendation, 

[ECF No. 15], is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order 

by reference;

(2) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Defendant Commissioner’s decision denying 

Plaintiff’s eligibility for Social Security Disability Income Benefits is hereby 

REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to Defendant Commissioner to 

reevaluate the evidence pertaining to Plaintiff’s mental impairments and issue a 

new decision; and

(3) This action is CLOSED for administrative purposes.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 20th day of March, 2023.

________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: All Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23639-DPG Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 6
                                                                       ---------

                                  CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the report of Western Oil Sands, Inc. (the "Company") on the
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


DATED this 30th day of March, 2005.


/s/ Guy J. Turcotte
--------------------------
Guy J. Turcotte
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
Western Oil Sands, Inc.
# Úřední věstník C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 427I |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 6219. prosince 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 427I

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 6219. prosince 2019

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Oznámení |
| | SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ |
| | Evropská komise |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Výzva k podávání přihlášek do soutěže o Cenu Jana Amose Komenského za vysoce kvalitní výuku o Evropské unii | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Evropská komise

2019/C 427 I/01

Výzva k podávání přihlášek do soutěže o Cenu Jana Amose Komenského za vysoce kvalitní výuku o Evropské unii

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

V Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Evropská komise

| 19.12.2019 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CI 427/1

---

Výzva k podávání přihlášek

do soutěže o „Cenu Jana Amose Komenského za vysoce kvalitní výuku o Evropské unii“

(2019/C 427 I/01)

Generální ředitelství Evropské komise pro vzdělávání, mládež, sport a kulturu zveřejňuje výzvu k podávání přihlášek do soutěže Evropské unie o „Cenu Jana Amose Komenského za vysoce kvalitní výuku o Evropské unii“.

Cena bude udělena školám poskytujícím sekundární vzdělávání, které svým žákům podnětným způsobem předávají znalosti o Evropské unii. V celé Unii zajistí uznání a viditelnost práce, kterou tyto školy vykonávají v jednotlivých členských státech, a upozorní na význam výuky o EU a získávání vědomostí v této oblasti již v mladém věku. Díky ocenění bude možné představit a následně šířit inovativní výukové metody, které aktivně zapojují žáky do vzdělávání o EU.

Výzva je určena školám poskytujícím sekundární vzdělávání (úroveň 2 a 3 podle klasifikace ISCED), které byly zřízeny a mají sídlo v Evropské unii (nikoli jednotlivým učitelům).

V této soutěži bude rozděleno až dvacet osm (28) cen, pro každý členský stát jedna, přičemž každá je spojena s finančním oceněním ve výši 8 000 EUR.

Pokud Spojené království vystoupí z EU před tím, než Evropská komise rozhodne o udělení cen (krátce po vyhodnocení přihlášek), aniž by uzavřelo dohodu, že se zájemci ze Spojeného království mohou o cenu dále ucházet, nesmí školy ze Spojeného království o tuto cenu dále soutěžit. V tom případě bude uděleno maximálně 27 cen (namísto 28), ale související finanční odměna se nezmění (tzn. 8 000 EUR).

Přihlášky lze podávat do čtvrtka 6. února 2020 do 17:00 SEČ.

Veškeré příslušné informace a formuláře přihlášek jsou k dispozici na této adrese:

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_en

---