alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 92-463 that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Women Veterans (Committee) will be held on June 26-27, 2000, at the Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Room 230, Washington, DC. On June 26, the meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. On June 26, the meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. On June 27, the meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 12 noon.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs regarding the needs of women veterans with respect to health care, rehabilitation, compensation, outreach, and other programs and activities administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs designed to meet such needs. The Committee will make recommendations to the Secretary regarding such activities.

Both days of the meeting will be to discuss the proceedings of the National Summit on Women Veterans Issues, scheduled on June 23-25, 2000, in preparation of the Committee's annual report. All sessions will be open to the public.

Those who plan to attend should contact Ms. Maryanne Carson, Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Women Veterans, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420 at (202) 273-6193.

Dated: June 5, 2000.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Marvin R. Eason,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-14757  Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
September 3, 2015

Docket No FAA-2015-2118

Addendum 1

Flying Media

Craig Peck, Owner

837 Willow Rd.

Lancaster, PA 17601

cpeck@flyingmedia.net

717.475.2482

Description of aircraft(s) for proposed UAS operation(s):

1. AeroNavics Sky Jib -Ti-QRX4XL, multi-rotor, max. weight (including payload) is 40 lbs.

2. DJI Flame Wheel F550, multi-rotor, max. weight (including payload) is 5.5 lbs.
§ 952.10 Answer. ( a ) The answer shall contain a concise statement admitting, denying, or explaining each of the allegations set forth in the complaint.
( b ) Any facts alleged in the complaint which are not denied or are expressly admitted in the answer may be considered as proved, and no further evidence regarding these facts need be adduced at the hearing.
( c ) The answer shall be signed personally by an individual Respondent, or in the case of a partnership by one of the partners, or, in the case of a corporation or association, by an officer thereof.
( d ) The answer shall set forth Respondent's address, electronic mail address, and telephone number or the name, address, electronic mail address, and telephone number of an attorney representing Respondent.
( e ) The answer shall affirmatively state whether the Respondent will appear in person or by counsel at the hearing.
( f ) In lieu of appearing at the hearing in person or by counsel, Respondent may request that the matter be submitted for determination pursuant to § 952.17(b)(10).
§ 3055.20 First-Class Mail. ( a ) For each of the Single-Piece Letters/Postcards, Presorted Letters/Postcards, and Flats products within the First-Class Mail class, report the on-time service performance (as a percentage rounded to one decimal place), disaggregated by mail subject to the overnight, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day, and 5-day service standards, as well as in the aggregate for the 3-to-5-day service standards.
( b ) For each of the Outbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail International and Inbound Letter Post products within the First-Class Mail class, report the on-time service performance (as a percentage rounded to one decimal place), disaggregated by mail subject to the 2-day, 3-day, 4-day, and 5-day service standards, as well as in the aggregate for the 3-to-5-day service standards and in the aggregate for all service standards combined.
( c ) For each product that does not meet its service goal during the reporting period, report the point impact data for the top ten root causes of on-time service performance failures, at the Postal Administrative Area and National levels, during the previous fiscal year. “Point impact data” means the number of percentage points by which on-time performance decreased due to a specific root cause of failure. Identification and a description of all potential root causes of failure assigned during the previous fiscal year and any changes to the Postal Service's methodology for calculating point impact data shall be included.
[88 FR 10039, Feb. 16, 2023]
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 18, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1692 

Lower Tribunal No. 18-12047

________________

Marcos Castells,

Appellant,

vs.

People’s Trust Insurance Company,

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Beatrice Butchko, Judge.

Marin, Eljaiek, Lopez & Martinez, P.L., and Steven E. Gurian, for 

appellant.

Bickford & Chidnese, LLP, and Patrick M. Chidnese (Tampa), for 

appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See People’s Tr. Ins. Co. v. Vidal, 305 So. 3d 710, 715 (Fla. 

3d DCA 2020) (“While People’s Trust did not seek to invoke its right to 

appraisal as an affirmative defense in response to Insureds’ complaint, 

People’s Trust did, in the same pleading containing its affirmative defenses, 

assert two counterclaims expressly seeking Insureds’ compliance with the 

appraisal provision. . . . Because People’s Trust invoked its right to appraisal 

in its first responsive pleading, we conclude People’s Trust did not waive the 

right to seek appraisal by actively litigating the case.”) (footnote omitted); 

People’s Tr. Ins. Co. v. Nowroozpour, 277 So. 3d 135, 136-37 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2019) (“After a homeowner has filed suit, it may be traditional for an insurer 

to move to compel an appraisal to seek enforcement of the policy provisions; 

however, this does not preclude an insurer from filing a counterclaim alleging 

that the insurer is entitled to enforce the provisions of the insurance contract 

through specific performance.”).
Home

	                    !!! CHANGE NOTICE !!!	                

	                    Search & Browse	                

	                    Currency and Updating	                

	                    Classification Tables	                

	                    Popular Name Tool	                

	                    Other OLRC Tables and Tools	                

	                    Cite Checker	                

	                    Table III - Statutes at Large	                

	                    Other Tables	                

	                    Understanding the Code	                

	                    About the Code and Website	                

	                    About Classification	                

	                    Detailed Guide to the Code	                

	                    FAQ and Glossary	                

	                    Positive Law Codification	                

	                    Editorial Reclassification	                

	                    Downloads	                

	                    Other Legislative Resources	                

	                    CONGRESS.GOV	                

	                    govinfo	                

	                    HOLC Statutory Compilations	                

                    The United States Code is a consolidation and codification by subject matter of the **general** and **permanent** laws                    of the United States. It is prepared by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of                    the United States House of Representatives. For currency information, click here.                 

Advanced Search

Preferences

Search Tips

                                Current                            change...Current2018 Ed. and Supplement V (1/3/2024)2018 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/5/2023)2018 Ed. and Supplement III (1/3/2022)2018 Ed. and Supplement II (1/13/2021)2018 Ed. and Supplement I (1/24/2020)2018 Main Ed. (1/14/2019)2012 Ed. and Supplement V (1/12/2018)2012 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/6/2017)2012 Ed. and Supplement III (1/3/2016)2012 Ed. and Supplement II (1/5/2015)2012 Ed. and Supplement I (1/16/2014)2012 Main Ed. (1/15/2013)2006 Ed. and Supplement V (1/3/2012)2006 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/7/2011)2006 Ed. and Supplement III (2/1/2010)2006 Ed. and Supplement II (1/5/2009)2006 Ed. and Supplement I (1/8/2008)2006 Main Ed. (1/3/2007)2000 Ed. and Supplement V (1/2/2006)2000 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/3/2005)2000 Ed. and Supplement III (1/19/2004)2000 Ed. and Supplement II (1/6/2003)2000 Ed. and Supplement I (1/22/2002)2000 Main Ed. (1/2/2001)1994 Ed. and Supplement V (1/23/2000)1994 Ed. and Supplement IV (1/5/1999)1994 Ed. and Supplement III (1/26/1998)1994 Ed. and Supplement II (1/6/1997)1994 Ed. and Supplement I (1/16/1996)1994 Main Ed. (1/4/1995)

				    17v4                          About the OfficePrivacy Policy
§ 952.12 Amendment of pleadings. ( a ) Amendments shall be filed with the Recorder.
( b ) By consent of the parties, a pleading may be amended at any time. Also, a party may move to amend a pleading at any time prior to the close of the hearing and, provided that the amendment is reasonably within the scope of the proceeding initiated by the complaint, the presiding officer rule on the motion as he or she deems to be fair and equitable to the parties.
( c ) When issues not raised by the pleadings but reasonably within the scope of the proceedings initiated by the complaint are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings. Such amendments as may be necessary to conform the pleadings to the evidence and to raise such issues may be allowed at any time upon the motion of any party.
( d ) If a party objects to the introduction of evidence at the hearing on the ground that it is not within the issues raised by the pleadings, but fails to satisfy the presiding officer that an amendment of the pleadings would prejudice him or her on the merits, the presiding officer may allow the pleadings to be amended and may grant a continuance to enable the objecting party to rebut the evidence presented.
( e ) The presiding officer may, upon reasonable notice and upon such terms as are just, permit service of a supplemental pleading setting forth transactions, occurrences, or events which have occurred since the date of the pleading sought to be supplemented and which are relevant to any of the issues involved.
Exhibit 4.2



Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated November 7, 2019, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 1969 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-233300) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


	    /s/ Grant Thornton LLP	 



 


Chicago, Illinois


November 7, 2019
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

EXHIBIT

“E”

EXHIBIT “E”

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 127-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/21/2023 Page 1 of 4
#### George Frederick CARNES, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 13560.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1958.

Certiorari Denied Jan. 26, 1959.

See 79 S.Ct. 351.

Hayden C. Covington, Brooklyn, N. Y., Victor F. Schmidt, Columbus, Ohio, for appellant.

Henry J. Cook, U. S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., for appellee.

Before SIMONS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and THORNTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This appellant, having waived trial by jury, was convicted by the district court for violation of Title 50, Appendix, section 462, United States Code, in refusing to be inducted for service in the armed forces of the United States, and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment.

For the reasons stated in the oral opinion of District Judge Swinford, we think the judgment of conviction and sentence should be upheld. The facts of the case bring it within the principle of United States v. Nugent, 346 U.S. 1, 73 S.Ct. 991, 97 L.Ed. 1417.

In the instant case, the defendant-appellant, in compliance with the doctrine of the Nugent case, was furnished a fair résumé of any adverse evidence in the report of the investigator. He was not entitled to the production of all the investigative records of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court is affirmed.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5193

To amend the National Housing Act to temporarily extend the applicability

of the downpayment simplification provisions for the FHA single family

housing mortgage insurance program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 2000

Mr. LAZIO (for himself and Mr. KUYKENDALL) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the National Housing Act to temporarily extend

the applicability of the downpayment simplification provisions for the FHA single family housing mortgage insurance program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Downpayment

5 Simplification Extension Act of 2000’’.
2

•HR 5193 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF APPLICABILITY OF DOWNPAYMENT

2 SIMPLIFICATION PROVISIONS.

3 Subparagraph (A) of section 203(b)(10) of the Na4 tional Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(10)(A)) is amend5 ed by striking ‘‘executed for insurance in fiscal years

6 1998, 1999, and 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘closed on or before

7 October 15, 2000’’.

Æ
Order entered July 14, 2022 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00030-CV 

IN RE MELISSA LARSEN,THE CARDIO GROUP, LLC, LARSEN 

MEDICAL, LLC D/B/A CARDIOVASCULAR DEVICES SERVICES, LLC, 

PRACTICE FREEDOM COACHING LLC, CARDIOLOGY INSTITUTE 

OF AMERICA LLC, TRACTION INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, LLC AND 

CARDIOCLOUD, LLC, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. DC-18-05693, DC-21-04344 

ORDER 

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we LIFT the stay in this case and 

DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. 

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
Mes ACGIH TLV's Ceiling

Exp 8Hr TWA STEL

Ammonia NH3 <5 25 35

Benzene C6H6 <5 0.5 2.5 Never Seen in Air Bags

Carbon Dioxide CO2 441 5000 30000-15min

Carbon Monoxide CO 40 50 OSHA 200 50/35/25 OSHA/NIOSH/ACGIH

Chlorine Cl2 <0.2 0.5 1 PVC Augment

Formaldehyde COH2 <0.5 0.3 0.3 If Nylon Bag Pyrolizes

Hydrochloric Acid HCl <1 5 5 PVC Augment

Hydrogen Cyanide HCN <2 4.7 4.7 Organic Solid Propellants

Hydrogen Sulfide H2S <1 10 15 Autoliv MoS2 Inflator

Nitrogen Dioxide NO2 <1 3 5

pH 7.5 (4 to 10) in 1L of Water Automotive specification

Phosgene COCl2 <0.02 0.1

Sulfur Dioxide SO2 <1 2 5

Sodium Azide NaN3 <0.02 0.3Mg/M3 0.3Mg/M3

Sodium Hydroxide NaOH ND 2 Mg/M3

Particulates Total 15.3 10 Mg/M3 15-30 min

Mes ACGIH TLV's Ceiling

Exp 8Hr TWA STEL

Ammonia NH3 <5 25 35

Benzene C6H6 <5 0.5 2.5 Never Seen in Air Bags

Carbon Dioxide CO2 882 5000 30000-15min

Carbon Monoxide CO 80 50 OSHA 200 50/35/25 OSHA/NIOSH/ACGIH

Chlorine Cl2 <0.2 0.5 1 PVC Augment

Formaldehyde COH2 <0.5 0.3 0.3 If Nylon Bag Pyrolizes

Hydrochloric Acid HCl <1 5 5 PVC Augment

Hydrogen Cyanide HCN <2 4.7 4.7 Organic Solid Propellants

Hydrogen Sulfide H2S <1 10 15 Autoliv MoS2 Inflator

Nitrogen Dioxide NO2 <1 3 5

pH 7.5 (4 to 10) in 1L of Water Automotive specification

Phosgene COCl2 <0.02 0.1

Sulfur Dioxide SO2 <1 2 5

Sodium Azide NaN3 <0.02 0.3Mg/M3 0.3Mg/M3

Sodium Hydroxide NaOH ND 2 Mg/M3

Particulates Total 31 10 Mg/M3 15-30 min STEL was 30 Penn Health Laws

 STEL Canada 20 - 30 min

Augment

PVC Augment

Autoliv MoS2 Inflator

Note: PH=7.5

https://www.mathesontrigas.com/pdfs/products/Threshold-Limit-Values-(TLV).pdf

http://www.state.tn.us/sos/rules/0800/0800-01/0800-01-01.20090729.pdf

 N2 Towers Estimated Room Toxicological Results

Sodium Azide/Iron Oxide (NaN3/Fe2O3) Passenger Module test in 100 Ft3 Chamber 95 Dodge Neon

 Inflators which could have species

NH4N3 Inflators

PVC Augment

Autoliv MoS2 Inflator

Augment

 Inflators which could have species

NH4N3 Inflators

https://www.mathesontrigas.com/pdfs/products/Threshold-Limit-Values-%28TLV%29.pdf

http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/deh/hazmat/pdf/hm-9243-01-03.pdf

NaN3 & NaOH presence indicates filter failure

Note <x = Not Detected, Detection limit =x

STEL,s are averaged over 30 minuites, occupancy required only for 5 minuites

 TRW N2 Passenger Inflator 6/18/02 3P129511

Sodium Azide/Iron Oxide (NaN3/Fe2O3) Passenger Module test in 100 Ft3 Chamber 95 Dodge Neon

All Values PPM except were noted (PH & Mg/M3)

CO STEL Penn Health laws was 400 PPM 30 min average

 STEL was 30 Penn Health Laws

 STEL Canada 20 - 30 min

Note: PH=7.5
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5222 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5222

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide attending 
    physicians greater authority in determining whether a medicare 
  beneficiary is eligible for hospice care under the medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2000

 Mr. Salmon (for himself, Mr. McCollum, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. McHugh, and 
 Mr. Hansen) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide attending 
    physicians greater authority in determining whether a medicare 
  beneficiary is eligible for hospice care under the medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF DEFINITION OF TERMINALLY ILL WITH RESPECT TO 
              HOSPICE CARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(dd)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395x(dd)(3)(A)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(3)(A) An individual is considered to be `terminally ill' if--
            ``(i) the individual has been diagnosed as having a 
        terminal illness; and
            ``(ii) the individual's attending physician determines that 
        hospice care furnished under a hospice program is appropriate 
        for the individual.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to individuals making initial elections for hospice care 
under the medicare program on or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5388 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5388

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate a building proposed to be located within the boundaries of 
the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, as the ``Herbert H. Bateman 
                 Education and Administrative Center''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5388

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate a building proposed to be located within the boundaries of 
the Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, as the ``Herbert H. Bateman 
                 Education and Administrative Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    A building proposed to be located within the boundaries of the 
Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, on Assateague Island, Virginia, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Herbert H. Bateman Education and 
Administrative Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Herbert H. Bateman Education 
and Administrative Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 24, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

# **PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(Subsection (a)and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

** **

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Alexander’s, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the threemonths ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| May 1, 2006 |       /s/  Joseph Macnow       |   |
|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|        | Name: Joseph Macnow                                          |
|        | Title: Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |