alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Process-Selection Considerations","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"soji2HWlh2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/23-pcs\/\">Process-Selection Considerations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/23-pcs\/embed\/#?secret=soji2HWlh2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Process-Selection Considerations” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"soji2HWlh2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7168

ERNEST RICHARD TATUM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; MICKEY RAY,

Warden, F.C.I. Estill,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-96-36-6)

Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: December 19, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Richard Tatum, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe Delforge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Tatum v. North Carolina Attorney Gen., No. CA96-36-6 (M.D.N.C. July 10, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>


Exhibit 16.2 - Letter of Anderson ZurMuehlen & Co., P.C.


                        [Anderson ZurMuehlen & Co., P.C.]



September 17, 2001



Securities and Exchange Commission Mail Stop 9-5 450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20548

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have read and agree with the comments in the "Information Concerning Change
in Auditor in the Two Most Recent Fiscal Years" section of the Proxy Statement
for the October 28, 2001 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of Eagle Bancorp.

Sincerely,

/s/ Anderson ZurMuehlen & Co., P.C.
------------------------------------
    Anderson ZurMuehlen & Co., P.C.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 5394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02021]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Advisory Board

AGENCY: Office of Environmental Management, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and in accordance with Title 41 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations, section 102-3.65(a), and following 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Environmental 
Management Advisory Board (Board) will be renewed for a two-year period 
beginning January 23, 2014.
    The Board provides the Assistant Secretary for Environmental 
Management (EM) with information and strategic advice on a broad range 
of corporate issues affecting the EM program. These corporate issues 
include, but are not limited to, project management and oversight 
activities, cost/benefit analyses, program performance, human capital 
development, and contracts and acquisition strategies.
    Additionally, the renewal of the Environmental Management Advisory 
Board has been determined to be essential to conduct DOE's business and 
to be in the public interest in connection with the performance of 
duties imposed on DOE by law and agreement. The Board will operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
and rules and regulations issued in implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kristen G. Ellis, Designated 
Federal Officer, at (202) 586-5810 or kristen.ellis@em.doe.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC on January 23, 2014.
Carol A. Matthews,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-02021 Filed 1-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit 10.03   April 6, 2010   Health Enhancement Products, Inc. 7740 E. Evans Rd.  St A101 Scottsdale, AZ 85260  Attn:  Janet Crance, CFO  RE:  Amended and Restated Sublease  Dear Janet:  Reference is made to that certain amended and restated sublease between the undersigned and Health Enhancement Products, Inc. (Company), dated April 12, 2006 (Sublease).  We have agreed in principle to amend the Sublease effective October 1, 2009, as follows:  Ø The Company will no longer occupy those portions of the premises designated Space B and Space C in the Sublease.  Ø The square footage occupied by the Company of that portion of the premises designated Space D in the Sublease has been reduced from 5,900 sq. ft. to 2,949 sq. ft.  Ø The total space to be occupied by the Company will consist of 4,672 sq. ft. of warehouse space and 4,794 of office space.  Ø The monthly rent shall be $18,200, which includes monthly real estate taxes of $1,480.  Ø I as landlord will be responsible for taxes, repairs and maintenance; the Company shall reimburse me for 70% of repairs and maintenance, upon submission of proper documentation.  The Companys portion of real estate taxes (currently $1,480 per mo.) is included in the monthly rent, as noted above.  The annual escalation shall not apply to that portion of the rent constituting real estate taxes, which shall be subject to annual adjustment based on actual taxes payable.  We will work to enter into a Second Amended and Restated Lease which reflects the above terms, as soon as reasonably possible.  Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by countersigning this letter agreement below where indicated, whereupon this agreement will be deemed to have amended the Sublease between us.  The sublease remains in full force and effect except as amended hereby.    S/Howard Baer Accepted and Agreed: Howard. R. Baer Health enhancement Products, Inc.  S/Janet Crance Janet Crance, CFO
NO. 05-14-01254-CV INTHE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
MARTIN L. GRAMAN,Appellant


### v. JASON L. GRAMAN,Appellee
On Appeal from the 4 l6th Judicial District Court ofCollin County, Texas Cause No. 416-51105-2012

UNOPPOSED MOTIONTO POSTPONE ORAL .ARGUMENT OFAPPELLANT Jeffrey Goldfarb Texas BarNo. 00793820 GOLDFARB PLLC SaintAnn Court 2501 N. Harwood, Suite 1801 Dallas, Texas 75201 Tel.: (214) 583-2233 Fax: (214) 583-2234 jgoldfarb@goldfarbpllc.com ACCEPTED 05-14-01254-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS 10/20/2015 12:00:34 PM

LISA MATZ CLERK

### . .

### . . . .,,..

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

### Pursuantto Rule 10.5(c) ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, Appellant Martin L. 

### Graman ("Appellant") seeks apostponement oforal argument inthis case. In support of this Motion, Appellant would respectfully show the Court the following: 1. Oral argument is currently set on December 15, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 2. Appellant seeks a postponement oforal argument to a later date. 3. Counsel for Appellant seeks to postpone the oral argument due to demands placed on him by other matters, namely: Counsel Jeffrey Goldfarb is set for a day-long evidentiary hearing in Florida state court in Miami, Florida on December 14, 2015. 4. This Motion is not being filed for purposes ofdelay, but rather so that justice may be done in this case. 5. This Motion is agreed to by all parties. PRAYER 

### AppellantMartin L. 

### Gramanrespectfully asks the Court grantthis Motion and postpone oral argument set for December 15, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. to a later date.

APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO POSTPONE ORAL ARGUMENT Page2• '

Dated: October 20, 2015 '"

Respectfully submitted, By: 

### IslJeffrey Goldfarb Jeffrey Goldfarb State BarNo. 00793820 GOLDFARB PLLC SaintAnn Court 

### ..

2501 N. Harwood Street, Suite 1801 Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: 214.583.2333 Fax: 214.583.2234 jgoldfarb@goldfarbpllc.com 

### ATTORNEYS FOR

### APPELLANT MARTIN L. GRAMAN

APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO POSTPONE ORAL ARGUMENT PageJ

### CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I hereby certify that I conferred with W. "Trey" R. Dyer, III, counsel for Appellee Jason 

### L. Graman, regarding the relief sought in this Motion. Mr. Dyer stated that his client was unopposed to the reliefsought herein. IslJeffrey Goldfarb Jeffrey Goldfarb 

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing has been served on the following counsel in accordance with the Texas Rules ofCivil Procedure on October 20, 2015: W. "Trey" R. Dyer III CHERRYPETERSENLANDRYALBERTLLP 8350 North Central Expressway Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75206-1632 I sl Jeffrey Goldfarb Jeffrey Goldfarb

APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO POSTPONE ORAL ARGUMENT Page4
#### § 329.3 General policies.

Precise definitions of “navigable waters of the United States” or “navigability” are ultimately dependent on judicial interpretation and cannot be made conclusively by administrative agencies. However, the policies and criteria contained in this regulation are in close conformance with the tests used by Federal courts and determinations made under this regulation are considered binding in regard to the activities of the Corps of Engineers.
'.t910-I3-U]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-20IX-XXXXX; Directorate Identifier 2008-SW-25-AD]

!UN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthincss Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company (Robinson) Model R22,

R22 Alpha, R22 Beta, and R22 Mariner Helicopters, and Model R44, and R44 II

Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration. DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: This document proposes adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for

Robinson Model R22, R22 Alpha, R22 Beta, and R22 Mariner helicopters, and Madej

R44 and R44 II helicopters. The AD would require visually inspecting each tail rotor

(T/R) control pedal bearing block support (support) for a crack. measuring the thickness

of each support, installing support safety tabs on certain supports, and replacing supports

of a certain thickness during overhaul. This proposal is prompted by two reports of

Madej R22 helicopters experiencing broken supports during flight. which resulted in the

T/R control pedals becoming jammed. The actions specified by the proposed AD are

intended to prevent the supports from breaking, which can bind the T/R control pedals,

resulting in a reduction of yaw control and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

()ATES: Comments must be received on or before [insert date 60 days after date of

publication in the Federal Register].

ADDRESSES: Usc one of the following addresses to submit comments on this proposed

AD:

• Federal eRulemaking 1'0I1al: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the

instructions for submitting comments .

• Fax: 202-493-2251.

O:;U':ll'.£>.tf~

Ol.n•••.•tl \1l'Ol.

ACO Egr'

~l tAU,),\"

£'5J-rie.W

~-'8'-1O

ACO J\I~r

1--' 6'-<;'IU"",,

'''';{Nrtf

.,~ ll'~.~, 'll,,' "

I Zd-

"""~~

'''61'1J /U

'.. "' ..,,',"""

.•n, 'I' .~,

1\11

,II',.•",.,
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MIDLAND INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report")
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ John Simmonds
-----------------
John G. Simmonds
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer of the Registrant)

Dated: July 14, 2006


/s/ Gary Hokkanen
-----------------
Gary Hokkanen
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer of the Registrant)

Dated: July 14, 2006



                                       25
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   SCHEDULE II - CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                                                 DUCK HEAD APPAREL COMPANY, INC.
                                                                   Fiscal 2000, 1999, and 1998


                                           BALANCE AT         CHARGED TO          CHARGED                               BALANCE
                                            BEGINNING         COSTS AND           TO OTHER                             AT END OF
                                            OF PERIOD          EXPENSES           ACCOUNTS         DEDUCTIONS           PERIOD
                                         ----------------   ---------------    ---------------   ----------------   ----------------
<S>                                   <C>                        <C>                    <C>            <C>                <C>

Acounts receivable allowances:
    Year ended July 1, 2000           $        1,618             1,708                  -              2,107              1,219
    Year ended July 3, 1999                    1,136             3,817                  -              3,335              1,618
    Year ended June 27, 1998                   1,279             2,481                  -              2,624              1,136
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Annual Report of Secured Financial Network, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael E. Fasci, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company./s/Michael E. FasciMarch 30, 2011

Michael E. Fasci, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JAMES RILEY DAVIS
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1639

[ February 21, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Laura S. Johnson , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2017

- CF

002327

- AXXX

- MB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III,

Ass istant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NUMBER 13-21-00438-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

IN THE INTEREST OF T.C. and K.C., CHILDREN

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 

of Nueces County, Texas. 

ORDER

Before Justices Hinojosa, Tijerina, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This is an appeal of a final order terminating parental rights. The court reporter has 

filed a first ten-day request for extension of time to file the reporter’s record.

Appeals in parental termination and child protection cases are governed by the 

rules of appellate procedure for accelerated appeals but include additional expedited 

deadlines and procedures. See TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4; TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). The 

intermediate appellate courts are directed to ensure “as far as reasonably possible” that 
2

these appeals are brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of 

appeal is filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2(a). Given the nature of these cases and the 

shortened appellate deadlines, we limit the request to one ten-day extension of time 

absent truly extraordinary circumstances. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

This Court, having fully examined and considered the court reporter’s request is of 

the opinion that, in the interest of justice, the court reporter’s first request for extension of 

time to file the reporter’s record should be granted with order. The Court, however, 

requires strict adherence to the briefing rules in appeals of parental termination cases, 

such as this appeal, and looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by such extension

requests. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6; see also id. at R. 28.4.

The Court grants the court reporter’s request for extension of time. This request is 

granted insofar as the Court will extend the court reporter’s deadline to file the reporter’s 

record ten (10) days from the date of this order. Further requests for extension of time will 

not be favorably entertained by this Court, absent extraordinary circumstances.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

9th day of February, 2022.
P **OFFICE OF**  **THE AHORNEYGENERAL**  **OF TEXAS**  **AUSTIN**

we have your letter read8 La part ar ToXlowrt

dkreten% from t&e first quctk

which to be recognized In Faxes8howewr, the portion of the last qprctation which no hare undsr8oared

muld lead us to believe **that** only x and m en;y

oi the ooam3ltleo rafartwd~to In that paragraphdrs wetiaheQ tw determfne the raount sola or aeliooreu, wui* the weight man-. tioned in the artlolr be the Uetemintng faotar in estr;blishing

‘Cme Cubic Yard,* while tn instmcee wherct

the mount dellverecl is dstermln-Depsrtaent of Agrloulture,Page 2

ad by l

otual 8weuruent, *one cubio Y81d8 would #IOU *ii? SUbi iSOt’ PQ$CUah+S Of thS d.@t **of** tho OoBBodltJ. FUr f&IA In Artto1r 1048 of **the Pen&l**  cm outaia

pualtioe

l etabllehedior those who fall **to** M srd the **unltg** ot measure as eetabllaiwl in *c 1010 lW4, ROJ, 1926. e *~a mtioie **108,** ma, 196s we fina the roilowing: 'The fOuoWl~? StUtUd8 of C+W8Anur ?or the ibipunt of fruit and vegotabl.8 in this dtato uo hembl oeliablished aad abopted as Stat* etenduU8. '1. Standax’ Euehol 6Mk.t. The etam%u'd buehelba8kot rhll @oattin net1oeet&a %lso.r **oubb** iao&oe &a **the** bmkot of the saanor Sn whloh the g3: opu, ro#amale8e a is Me.'

WttUg to the faot **that** the **t8tuidud** guelaol **Ba8k.t ’**  WhSB QrOpSFlJ pS@kSd and ZtllOd with gnu 

## 8pQlO8

will 

## not wo%gh '80poundr’ a& in most lnetanera,vi11 velgh oonaiderabl~lees than '50 paw&at, uo *ro ffeqwntly tmnfroated with the quortlon of Just what shall oonetltutea qt3taaUar% mu&l* of green applo8.* jfe have given oarriul ooneiduat~on to th&r rod perplexingproblu, and have rreohed the ooaolaeioathat the wall-roaeoaod

umly'rie oontafnedin Tour letter abwa quoted ir o0rroot~ I. 0.. that green applee whoa sold In bulk or when ~easur.c% br wlght are to bo @old upon the b&ta ;f If2;oundr to the bush01 as preeoribedby Article

but that when green epplee uo aold in bush;1 ;?oai&&e the weight of euoh bushel ie lmaoterial;y-z

,., t - ..- .


## aopartment

al Agriculturr, Page 3

so long as euah bushel basket oontaine %l60.4 

### oubio inohee as **pre8oriboU** 

### br Artiolr100, R. c. 8. In eaoh 

### inetaaoo the *alo 58 in oocordarm with the understandlag 

### and tatentier, of tho gertlee.
Pours very truly 

### ATTORNEY

GEHXRALOF TSXAS
EXHIBIT 15




September 5, 2003


Albertson's, Inc.
Boise, Idaho

We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim financial
information  of  Albertson's,   Inc.  and  subsidiaries  for  the  thirteen  and
twenty-six  week periods ended July 31, 2003 and August 1, 2002, as indicated in
our report  dated  September  3, 2003;  because we did not perform an audit,  we
expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended
July 31,  2003,  is  incorporated  by reference in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-54998 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 2-80776,  33-2139, 33-7901,
33-15062,  33-43635,  33-62799, 33-59803,  333-82157,  333-82161,  333-87773 and
333-73194 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/S/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
------------------------
Boise, Idaho