United States Department of Agriculture

Coconino National Forest Land 

and Resource Management Plan

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Volume IV. Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 

Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Forest 

Service

Coconino

National Forest

Southwestern Region MB-R3-04-32

March 2018
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations 

and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering 

USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender 

identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, 

income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights 

activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). 

Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. 

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., 

Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or 

USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay 

Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than 

English. 

To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, 

AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or 

write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To 

request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: 

(1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence 

Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: program.intake@usda.gov. 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Plan Crosswalk

Coconino National Forest

iii

Final Environmental Impact Statement

for the Coconino National Forest Service

Land and Resource Management Plan 

Coconino, Gila, and Yavapai Counties, Arizona

Volume IV. Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as 

amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service

Responsible Official: Calvin Joyner, Regional Forester

 333 Broadway Blvd., SE 

 Albuquerque, NM 87102 

 (505) 842-3292 

For Information Contact: Vernon Keller, Forest Planner

Coconino National Forest 

1824 South Thompson Street 

Flagstaff, AZ 86001 

(928) 527-3411

Abstract: To comply with the National Forest Management Act and address changes that have occurred 

over the past 30 years, the Coconino National Forest proposes to revise the current land management plan 

(1987 plan). This programmatic final environmental impact statement (FEIS) documents analysis of the 

impacts of four alternatives developed for programmatic management of the 1.8 million acres 

administered by the Coconino National Forest. The analysis displays the anticipated progress toward the 

desired conditions as well as the potential environmental and social consequences of implementing each 

alternative. Alternative A is the no-action alternative, which is the 1987 plan, as amended. Alternative B 

(modified) is the preferred alternative and is reflected in the accompanying Final Land and Resource 

Management Plan for the Coconino National Forest. This alternative addresses new information and 

concerns received since the 1987 forest plan was published, and it meets objectives of Federal laws, 

regulations, and policies. Alternative C considers increases in the amount of wilderness and special areas, 

as well as increased opportunities for semi-primitive recreation. Alternative D considers fewer restrictions 

on human access, use, and infrastructure.

Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

i 

Appendix I. Crosswalk between 1987 Coconino Forest 

Plan (as amended) and the proposed Revised Forest 

Plan 

Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1

How 1987 Plan direction was addressed ....................................................................................................... 2

1987 Plan direction that was carried forward ........................................................................................... 2

1987 Plan direction not carried forward ................................................................................................... 3

Cave Management ........................................................................................................................................ 4

Special Designations ..................................................................................................................................... 6

Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................................ 7

Dispersed Recreation--Standard Service Level Management ....................................................................... 8

Motor Vehicle Management ......................................................................................................................... 9

Visual Resource Planning and Inventory ...................................................................................................... 9

Wildlife and Fish......................................................................................................................................... 10

Range .......................................................................................................................................................... 23

Timber ......................................................................................................................................................... 25

Watershed ................................................................................................................................................... 31

Minerals ...................................................................................................................................................... 36

Forest Land Management Plan (LMP)/Special Uses/Lands ....................................................................... 37

Transport/Facilities ..................................................................................................................................... 39

Protection .................................................................................................................................................... 41

Management Area 1 - Wilderness ............................................................................................................... 43

Management Area 2 - Verde Wild and Scenic River .................................................................................. 49

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less Than 40 Percent Slopes......................... 49

Management Area 4 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Greater Than 40 Percent Slopes .................... 61

Management Area 5 - Aspen ...................................................................................................................... 62

Management Area 6 – Unproductive Timber Land .................................................................................... 64

Management Area 7 – Pinon-Juniper Woodland, Less Than 40 Percent Slopes ........................................ 66

Management Area 8 – Pinyon-Juniper Woodland, Greater Than 40 Percent Slopes ................................. 71

Management Area 9 – Mountain Grassland ............................................................................................... 72

Management Area 10 – Grassland and Sparse Pinon-Juniper Above the Rim ........................................... 74

Management Area 11 – Verde Valley ......................................................................................................... 76

Management Area 12 – Riparian and Open Water ..................................................................................... 79

Management Area 13 – Cinder Hills Off-Highway Vehicle Area .............................................................. 82

Management Area 14 – Oak Creek Canyon ............................................................................................... 86

Management Area 15 – Developed Recreation Sites .................................................................................. 92

Management Area 16 – Inner Basin ........................................................................................................... 93

Management Area 17 – Special Areas ........................................................................................................ 94

Management Area 19 – Mogollon Rim ...................................................................................................... 98

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area ....................................................................... 99

Management Area 21 – Dry Creek Basin ................................................................................................. 131

Management Area 22 - Gateway .............................................................................................................. 134

Management Area 23 – Lower Oak Creek ............................................................................................... 137

Management Area 24 – Neighborwoods .................................................................................................. 139

Management Area 25 – Red Cliff ............................................................................................................. 142

Management Area 26 – Redrock Frontcountry ......................................................................................... 146
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

ii

Management Area 27 - Savannah ............................................................................................................. 149

Management Area 28 – Schnebly Rim ..................................................................................................... 154

Management Area 29 - Transition ............................................................................................................ 155

Amendment 17 - Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area ............................................................................. 157

Management Area 31 – Craters Management Area .................................................................................. 179

Management Area 32 – Deadman Wash ................................................................................................... 181

Management Area 33 - Doney .................................................................................................................. 183

Management Area 34 - Flagstaff .............................................................................................................. 185

Management Area 35 – Lake Mary Watershed ........................................................................................ 185

Management Area 36 - Schultz ................................................................................................................. 190

Management Area 37 – Walnut Canyon ................................................................................................... 193

Management Area 38 - West .................................................................................................................... 198
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

1 

Introduction 

The purpose of the crosswalk is to demonstrate how some of the direction in the 1987 Coconino National 

Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (1987 Plan) was incorporated into the more strategic 

direction included in the proposed action, alternative B (modified) (proposed revised plan). The following 

tables are not an exhaustive account of all direction in the 1987 Plan. Rather, this appendix focuses on the 

1987 Plan direction in which partners, stakeholders, and commenters have expressed interest, such as 

direction for management of old growth, Mexican spotted owl habitat, the Flagstaff-Lake Mary area, and 

the Sedona-Oak Creek area. A more comprehensive crosswalk that addresses all of the 1987 Plan 

direction is included in the project record.

The tables in this appendix follow the plan direction as it appears in the 1987 Plan. They begin with the 

Forest Wide Management Direction on page 51 and go through the management area direction that 

concludes on page 206-117. The tables address groups of 1987 Plan direction by resource or management 

area.

From left to right, the tables list the page number of the 1987 Plan where that direction is located, the full 

text of the 1987 Plan direction, an explanation of how the 1987 Plan direction was addressed, and the 

related components and management approaches from alternative B (modified). As in the main body of 

the Final Environmental Impact Statement, this appendix uses short codes to identify the plan components 

in alternative B (modified) rather than including the full text of the component. The coding refers the 

reader to specific plan components in the proposed revised plan. Abbreviations are used in each code to 

identify: (1) if a plan decision applies forestwide (FW) or within a particular management (MA) or special 

(SA) area; (2) the applicable resource area (e.g., Air, Soil, etc.); and (3) type of plan decision (i.e., a 

desired condition (DC), objective (O), standard (S), or guideline (G)). The last part of each code is a 

number. For example, FW-WFP-DC-1 and 2 point to forestwide direction (FW) in the “Wildlife, Fish and 

Plants” section (WFP) and specifically to desired conditions (DC) numbers 1 and 2. The code SA-Wild-S1, 2, and 3 refers to the plan section on “Special Areas” (SA) which includes wilderness (Wild) as one 

type of special area, and standards (S) 1, 2 and 3 in that section. 

The tables also point to management approaches contained in the proposed revised plan. Management 

approaches are not mandatory plan direction, but they clarify application of plan direction and identify 

probable management actions that are designed to maintain or move toward desired conditions and 

objectives. Because management approaches are not mandatory plan direction they have not been 

numbered in the proposed revised plan. The crosswalk identifies individual management approach by 

assigning it a letter. The first management approach in a section is assigned the letter A, the second 

management approach is assigned the letter B, and so on. Otherwise the coding works the same as 

described above for desired conditions, objectives, standards, and guidelines. For example, FW-WFPMgtApp-A and D point to forestwide direction (FW) in the “Wildlife, Fish and Plants” section (WFP) and 

specifically to first and fourth management approaches (MgtApp) in that section. 

A quick way to find a component in the proposed revised plan is to search the electronic version. Use the 

Ctrl-F command for Microsoft operating systems or the Cmd-F command for Apple operating systems.

Then use part of the plan code to get to the relevant section. For example, if you’re looking for FW-WFPG-3, search for “FW-WFP-G.” That will take you to the guidelines section for Wildlife, Fish, and Plants. 

Then look for the third guideline in the numbered list of components in that section. 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

2

How 1987 Plan direction was addressed 

The 1987 Plan direction has been addressed in a number of ways in this forest plan revision effort. In 

some cases, the 1987 Plan directions was wholly carried over in to the proposed revised plan. In many 

cases, the purpose or focus of the 1987 direction was retained in a variety of other ways in the proposed 

revised plan. In a few cases, the 1987 Plan direction was not carried forward into the proposed revised 

plan. The following sections describe these various situations in greater detail and explain how the 

information in the tables will be linked to those situations.

1987 Plan direction that was carried forward

Direction from the 1987 Plan was carried forward into the proposed revised plan in a number of ways. 

Much of the direction is reflected in the plan components (desired conditions, objectives, standards, 

guideline, suitability determinations) and management approaches of the proposed revised plan. Other 

direction was not carried forward as a plan component, but was reflected in appendix B (Proposed and 

Probable Management Practices) or appendix D (Other Sources of Information). Each of these situations 

is described in detail below. 

A great deal of the direction in the 1987 Plan has been carried forward into the proposed revised plan. 

However, there is not always a one-to-one relationship between direction in the 1987 Plan and 

components and management approaches in the proposed revised plan. The proposed revised plan is 

strategic in nature, so the specific focus or intent of some 1987 Plan components did not always fit this 

strategic approach. Accordingly, many of the prescriptive standards and guidelines in the 1987 Plan were 

reframed as desired conditions or guidelines in the proposed revised plan. For example, a 1987 Plan 

component requires timber projects to evaluate bear habitat during project planning in dense pinyon 

juniper or areas adjacent to steep pinyon juniper. The proposed revised plan takes a more strategic 

approach and requires projects to be managed to maintain or improve habitat for native species (FWWFP-G-1) and requires timber harvest activities to be designed to maintain or more the forest toward 

ecological desired conditions (FW-FProd-G-2). For this reason, the crosswalk may point to numerous 

plan components. Some of those components will apply to the resource addressed by the 1987 Plan 

direction. Other components may address the activity. Actions under the proposed revised plan will need 

to consider all of this direction and lay out a course that is consistent with all the components. That may 

result in an action that is exactly or very similar to the action that would be required under the 1987 Plan, 

or something entirely different as long as it is consistent with the proposed revised plan’s components. 

For situations where the 1987 Plan direction has been carried forward into the proposed revised plan, the 

tables below will note that the 1987 Plan direction was “addressed in plan components and/or 

management approaches” in the “How it was addressed” column. 

Some 1987 Plan direction has been addressed through the proposed revised plan’s suitability 

determinations for timber, grazing, recreation, and transportation. The proposed revised plan includes 

these suitability determinations in Chapter 4; they are considered plan decisions. When the context of the 

1987 Plan implicates a suitability determination for one of these programs, consult Chapter 4 (Suitable 

Uses) in the proposed revised plan for information on these suitability determinations. For example, 1987 

direction that indicates domestic livestock grazing is closed in a particular management area is not 

reflected in the proposed revised plan’s components for that management area. Instead, that closure is 

acknowledged in the Grazing Capability and Suitability section in Chapter 4, Suitable Uses, of the 

proposed revised plan.

In numerous situations, the 1987 Plan included direction to prepare other plans for the management of 

resources on the Forest. The 1987 Plan also includes numerous references to conduct evaluations of 

certain areas or activities. Other necessary plans are required by law, regulation, and policy. For this 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

3 

reason, the proposed revised plan does not include direction to prepare additional plans for the 

management of resources on the Forest in plan components. Instead, this information is addressed in 

appendix B (Proposed and Probable Management Practices) of the proposed revised plan, which includes 

a list of proposed and probable management practices that may take place on the Forest under the 

proposed revised plan. The list in appendix B is not intended to be all-inclusive.

The 1987 Plan direction includes references to other sources of information, authorities such as laws, 

regulations, policies and other decisions and direction that the Forest is already obligated to follow. The 

proposed revised plan does not repeat these authorities in plan components for several reasons. The Forest 

is already required to follow applicable laws, regulations, policies, or other decisions or direction. 

Referencing these authorities or actions required by these authorities in a plan component does not change 

the Forest’s obligation. However, if these authorities are rescinded or the actions they require are changed, 

the Forest would still be required to follow the outdated direction referenced in its plan component. For 

these reasons, authorities such as laws, regulations, policies and other decisions and direction are not 

repeated in plan components in the proposed revised plan. Instead, appendix D (Other Sources of 

Information) of the proposed revised plan lists many of these authorities by resource, management area, 

and special area. The list included in appendix D is not intended to be exclusive; it is simply a helpful list 

of some of the other documents that provide information useful to management of the Coconino National 

Forest. Accordingly, some of the authorities mentioned in the 1987 Plan may not be listed in appendix D. 

The tables below will address this topic in the “How it was addressed” column in one of two ways. The 

table may note that the 1987 Plan direction was “referenced in appendix D of the revised plan.” Or, the 

table may note that the authority mentioned in the 1987 Plan “was not repeated in a plan component.” In

most cases, even though the reference to a specific authority was not carried forward in a plan component, 

the proposed revised plan has plan components and/or management approaches that are relevant to the 

resource or activity addressed by that authority. Those components will be listed in the “Related 

Components in Proposed Revised Plan” columns. 

1987 Plan direction not carried forward

As noted above, most of the direction from the 1987 Plan has been carried forward into the proposed 

revised plan or accounted for in another way. However, there were situations where the 1987 Plan 

direction conflicted with the overall approach of the proposed revised plan. These situations involve the 

1987 Plan direction to undertake site-specific projects or to conduct certain actions within a timeframe 

which has long since expired. For example, the 1987 Plan includes direction to take particular action to 

build or change certain recreational trails on the Forest. These specific decisions were not carried forward 

into plan components in the proposed revised plan. The proposed revised plan does not make any sitespecific decisions; those are made at the project level based on site-specific information. Instead, the 

proposed revised plan provides strategic guidance on what to consider when making a decision about a 

recreational trail. The Forest can still pursue the building or changing the trail mentioned in the 1987 

Plan, but that decision would be made at the project level based on site specific information. This type of 

direction is not tracked in the tables below. However, they are included in the comprehensive crosswalk 

that addresses all of the 1987 Plan direction that is included in the project record.
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

4

Cave Management 

Cave Management

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

51

Known caves are inventoried and evaluated Forest-wide under provisions of 

the Federal Cave Resources Protection Act of 1988 to determine the 

resources, their condition, and significance. Newly discovered caves are 

scheduled for evaluation as they become known.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in plan 

component, but proposed 

revised plan includes 

additional direction related to 

this topic.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-MgtApp-E 

51-1 

Caves determined to be significant under the Act, or which are being 

evaluated, are exempt from locational disclosures. The location and resources 

of caves are also kept confidential when need is to protect archaeological 

resources, wildlife habitat, cave biota, geological features and paleontological 

deposits. An inventory is maintained of all caves.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in plan 

component, but proposed 

revised plan includes 

additional direction related to 

this topic.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-3, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-5, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-MgtApp-D, FWBioPhys-Geo-S-1 

51-1 

Significant caves are monitored to determine visitor impacts and the 

conditions of key resources. Management techniques will be adjusted, based 

on the results of monitoring.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-G-1 

51-1 

Caves used, or recently used, by bat colonies are generally managed to 

maintain or enhance bat populations. Protection measures may include 

education, seasonal closures, and gating. Monitoring is used to determine 

population dynamics. Both monitoring and management include consultation 

with State and Federal wildlife agencies.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-G-5, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-6, FWBioPhys-Geo-MgtApp-C, FWBioPhys-Geo-MgtApp-F 

51-1 Appropriate caves are interpreted to increase public awareness of the need to 

protect and preserve cave resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-MgtApp-H, 

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-4 

51-2 Surface land management decisions include consideration of potential 

impacts to all cave resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-2, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

5 

Cave Management

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

51-2 

Any management activity planned near or within a known cave area is 

examined for its potential impacts to caves and karst features. This includes 

activities which might increase sedimentation, sterilize soil, change a cave's 

natural hydrology or water quality, add nutrients or other chemicals (including 

pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers), or modify the cave. Cave entrances and 

karst features are also not used as disposal sites for slash, waste rock or fill 

materials, and other refuse.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-2, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-2, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-4, FWBioPhys-Geo-MgtApp-H 

51-2 

Maintenance of cave microclimate, hydrology, and entrance vegetation is 

needed in order to protect long-term cave ecology. In general, during project 

planning evaluate at least a 300 foot radius around cave entrances, infeeder 

drainages, and surface areas immediately over cave passages for the effect 

on cave resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-2, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-3, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-4, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-2, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-3, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-4, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-6, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-7, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-8 

51-2 

Generally, major alterations to caves are not permitted. Following an 

excavation to locate an unknown cave, the condition of the original opening is 

mimicked so that air flow and wildlife use is not altered and the surface visual 

resource is maintained. Requests to locate caves using special excavation 

techniques (explosives, heavy machinery, removing large volumes of earth) 

are analyzed and considered on a case-by-case basis in compliance with the 

Archeological Protection Act and NEPA.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-2, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-4 

51-2 

Caves of high resource values, and a suitable buffer area of approximately 1/4 

mile from known cave passages, may be recommended for withdrawal from 

mineral entry.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Minerals-DC-1, FWMinerals-G-1 

51-2 

Controlled source seismic surveys requiring explosives or other disruptive 

techniques are not conducted over or close enough to known caves to create 

unnatural disturbances.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-G-4 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

6

Cave Management

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

51-2 

Drilling is not allowed over known caves or within a suitable buffer. No 

sediments from erosion of access roads and drilling sites is allowed to wash or 

be discharged into caves or karst features. If previously undiscovered caves 

are encountered above the zone of saturation for the regional aquifer during 

drilling operations, reasonable precautions are taken to protect the cave. This 

includes sealing the casing above and below the cave to prevent air flow and 

water leakage.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-2, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-3, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-4, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-2, FWBioPhys-Geo-G-4 

52 Pursue instream flow rights when existing rights are lacking or inadequate in 

order to protect recreation interests.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-2, FWWater-G-3 

Special Designations 

Special Designations

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

52

The Arizona Trail is a state-wide trail of which a portion traverses the 

Coconino National Forest. The trail goes from the north end of the Peaks 

Ranger District to the Mogollon Rim on the Mogollon Rim Ranger District. This 

Trail will be a non-motorized pathway. The route will use public lands to 

ensure public access; use existing trails, where use of the trails as part of the 

Arizona Trail does not cause substantial negative impacts; allow day-long, 

weekend, or week-long travel segments; accommodate hikers, equestrians, 

crosscountry skiers, and back-country bicyclists where physically possible and 

where management permits; provide representation of the various life zones, 

geologic features, native vegetation, wildlife, cultural resources, and resource 

management practices of the Coconino National Forest; be in harmony with 

other federal, state, and local government entities, and private landowners; 

and allow for continued production of outputs from forest resources as stated 

in the Forest Land Management Plan. The Forest Plan identifies a corridor, 

with the final trail location, design, construction, and signing to be 

accomplished by Forest staff and private sector/volunteer partnerships.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-NatlTrails-DC-4, SANatlTrails-DC-6, SA-NatlTrailsDC-7, SA-NatlTrails-DC-8, SANatlTrails-G-1, SA-NatlTrails-G10, SA-NatlTrails-G-2, SANatlTrails-G-3, SA-NatlTrails-G4, SA-NatlTrails-G-6, SANatlTrails-G-7 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

7 

Cultural Resources 

Cultural Resources

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

52 Consult with Native Americans when projects and activities are planned in 

sites or areas of known religious or cultural importance.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-A, FW-HrtgMgtApp-F, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-P, 

FW-Trbl-DC-1, FW-Trbl-G-2, 

FW-Trbl-MgtApp-A, FW-TrblMgtApp-B 

52

Make boughs and herbaceous plant parts used for Native American religious 

and ceremonial purposes available under conditions and procedures that 

minimize restrictions, consistent with laws, regulations, and agreements with 

Tribes. The written authorization to the Hopi Tribe for gathering without 

specific individual permits is an example. This authorization does not include 

such items as firewood removed from the Forest or Kiva logs, which do 

require a permit.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Trbl-DC-2, FW-Trbl-DC-3, 

FW-Trbl-G-1 

52-1 

Project undertakings are inventoried for cultural resources and areas of Native 

American religious use. Inventory intensity complies with Regional policy, and 

the settlement agreement for the Save The Jemez Lawsuit, and is determined 

in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). Generally, 

inventory standards are: 

 - One hundred percent survey of all projects causing complete surface 

disturbance; 

 - When less than 100 percent survey is deemed appropriate, the specific 

sample fraction surveyed is determined in consultation with the State 

Historic Preservation Officer and is generally greater than 10 percent. 

Factors determining when sampling is appropriate include projects with 

dispersed or minimal impacts, low expected archaeological site density, 

ground cover, and types of archaeological sites present in the area; 

 - Consultation with appropriate Native American groups; 

 - Consultation with the SHPO, and if necessary, the Advisory Council on 

Historic Preservation (ACHP), before project implementation.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in plan 

component, but proposed 

revised plan includes 

additional direction related to 

this topic.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-G-6 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

8

Cultural Resources

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

54

Continue to interpret cultural resources through lectures, tours, papers, 

reports, publications, brochures, displays, films, trails, signs, and other 

opportunities.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in plan 

component, but proposed 

revised plan includes 

additional direction related to 

this topic.

FW-Hrtg-DC-12, FW-Hrtg-DC5, FW-Hrtg-DC-8, FW-Hrtg-G-5 

Dispersed Recreation--Standard Service Level Management 

Dispersed Recreation – Standard Service Level Management

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

57

Manage areas for public safety, resource protection, compliance checks, and 

capacity monitoring. Dispersed areas are kept clean for aesthetics, health, 

and safety. Areas damaged due to use are closed and restored as necessary.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-AllG-2 

57 Maintain cross-country ski and snow play areas for public health and safety, 

using volunteers and permittees, as well as Forest personnel.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllG-2, FW-Rec-Dev-G-4, FWRec-Dev-MgtApp-G, FW-RecDisp-DC-1, FW-Rec-Disp-G-4, 

FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-A 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

9 

Motor Vehicle Management 

Motor Vehicle Management

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

59

The Pine Grove and Rattlesnake areas, of approximately 12,600 and 11,100 

acres, respectively, are closed to motorized use annually from August 15 

through December 31.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-LkMary-DC-4, MA-LkMaryS-1, MA-PineBelt-DC-5, MAPineBelt-DC-6, MA-PineBelt-S1, MA-PineBelt-S-2

59

Law enforcement is planned and implemented to minimize resource damage 

and user conflicts. Signing is appropriate to inform the publics and help 

minimize the need for direct law enforcement activities.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-G-3, FWInterpEd-MgtApp-C, FW-RecDisp-G-1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, 

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-6 

Visual Resource Planning and Inventory 

Visual Resource Planning and Inventory

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

60

Review the VQO inventory as a part of project planning and make necessary 

corrections/refinements following field checking. Use VQO inventory to 

analyze impacts to VQO classes due to management activities such as timber 

sales, range projects, and firewood sales. Use the current Forest Visual 

Resource Management Inventory that lists VQO Forest-wide in conjunction 

with Forest Plan MA Map and descriptions to plan projects. Acceptable 

Forest-wide variation is + 15 percent in each VQO class and relates to the 

changes from the updated inventory, except no change is allowed in 

Preservation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-ScenicG-1, FW-Scenic-G-2, FWScenic-G-3, FW-Scenic-G-4, 

FW-Scenic-MgtApp-E 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

10

Wildlife and Fish 

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

64

On identified big game winter ranges, treatments are designed to enhance the 

specified wildlife species. These areas are managed primarily for the welfare 

of the wildlife species using the area. Where forage is identified as a limiting 

factor for big game populations, seek opportunities to make available 

additional forage and implement where determined appropriate through 

analysis with the IRM and NEPA process.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-3, FW-WFP-G-3, 

FW-WFP-G-8 

64

Inventory, evaluate, and prepare recovery schedules for proposed, T&E, and 

sensitive plant and animal species in the first decade or as species are 

proposed. Monitor approved schedules, reproductive success, and effects of 

management activities at occupied threatened, endangered, and sensitive 

species sites. Reintroduce T&E species in accordance with recovery plans.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A 

64-1 

Activities determined to cause disturbance, including public use, are prohibited 

in the vicinity of occupied peregrine falcon nesting habitat between March 1 

and August 15. This seasonal restriction applies to occupied nesting habitat 

unless the site is determined to be unoccupied. It may be necessary to post 

signs and/or fence areas to provide protection.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-8,

FW-WFP-MgtApp-F 

65

Hedeoma diffusum and Senecio franciscanus are managed by the direction 

presented in the management plans prepared for each species. Hedeoma 

diffusum is covered by the Hedeoma diffusum Management Plan and Senecio 

franciscanus by the San Francisco Peaks Alpine Tundra Management Plan, 

which are both adopted by the Forest Plan.

Referenced in Appendix D and 

addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches. 

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WFPMgtApp-A 

65

Provide three levels of habitat management - protected, restricted, and other 

forest and woodland types to achieve a diversity of habitat conditions across 

the landscape.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

65

Protected areas include delineated protected activity centers; mixed conifer 

and pine oak forests with slopes greater than 40% where timber harvest has 

not occurred in the last 20 years; and reserved lands which include 

wilderness, research natural areas, wild and scenic rivers, and 

congressionally recognized wilderness study areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

11

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65 Restricted areas include all mixed-conifer, pine-oak, and riparian forests 

outside of protected areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

65 Establish a protected activity center at all Mexican spotted owl sites located 

during surveys and all management territories established since 1989.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

65

Allow no timber harvest except for fuelwood and fire risk abatement in 

established protected activity centers. For protected activity centers destroyed 

by fire, windstorm, or other natural disaster, salvage timber harvest or 

declassification may be allowed after evaluation on a case-by-case basis in 

consultation with US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

65 Limit human activity in protected activity centers during the breeding season.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-11, FW-WFPMgtApp-F, FW-WFP-S-2 

65-1 

In protected and restricted areas, when activities conducted in conformance 

with these standards and guidelines may adversely affect other threatened, 

endangered, or sensitive species or may conflict with other established 

recovery plans or conservation agreements; consult with US Fish and Wildlife 

Service to resolve the conflict.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A 

65-1 

Protected Activity Centers: Delineate an area of not less than 600 acres 

around the activity center using boundaries of known habitat polygons and/or 

topographic features. Written justification for boundary delineation should be 

provided.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-1 

The Protected Activity Center boundary should enclose the best possible owl 

habitat configured in as compact a unit as possible, with the nest or activity 

center located near the center.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-1 

The activity center is defined as the nest site. In the absence of a known nest, 

the activity center should be defined as a roost grove commonly used during 

breeding. In the absence of a known nest or roost, the activity center should 

be defined as the best nest/roost habitat.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

12

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-1 Protected Activity Center boundaries should not overlap.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-1 Submit protected activity center maps and descriptions to the recovery unit 

working group for comment as soon as possible after completion of surveys.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

65-1 Road or trail building in protected activity centers should be avoided but may 

be permitted on a case-by-case basis for pressing management reasons.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-1 Generally allow continuation of the level of recreation activities that was 

occurring prior to listing.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G2, FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G1, FW-WFP-G-3 

65-2 

Harvest fuelwood when it can be done in such a way that effects on the owl 

are minimized. Manage within the following limitations to minimize effects on 

the owl. 

 - Retain key forest species such as oak. 

 - Retain key habitat components such as snags and large downed logs. 

 - Harvest conifers less than 9 inches in diameter only within those protected 

activity centers treated to abate fire risk as described below, except for the 

Clark PAC there trees less than 16 inches diameter will be harvested.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

13

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-2 

Treat fuel accumulations to abate fire risk. 

 - Select for treatment 10% of the protected activity centers where nest sites 

are known in each recovery unit having high fire risk conditions. Also select 

another 10% of the protected activity centers where nest sites are known 

as a paired sample to serve as control areas. 

 - Designate a 100 acre "no treatment" area around the known nest site of 

each selected protected activity center. Habitat in the no treatment area 

should be as similar as possible in structure and composition as that found 

in the activity center. 

 - Use combinations of thinning trees less than 9 inches in diameter (or less 

than 16 inches in the Clark PAC), mechanical fuel treatment and 

prescribed fire to abate fire risk in the remainder of the selected protected 

activity center outside the 100 acre "no treatment" area. 

 - Retain woody debris larger than 12 inches in diameter, snags, clumps of 

broadleafed woody vegetation, and hardwood trees larger than 10 inches 

in diameter at the root collar. 

 - Select and treat additional protected activity centers in 10% increments if 

monitoring of the initial sample shows there were no negative impacts or 

there were negative impacts which can be mitigated by modifying 

treatment methods. 

 - Use light prescribed burns in non-selected protected activity centers on a 

case- by- case basis. Burning should avoid a 100 acre "no treatment" area 

around the activity center. Large woody debris, snags, clumps of broadleafed woody vegetation should be retained and hardwood trees larger 

than 10 inches diameter at the root collar. 

 - Pre and post treatment monitoring should be conducted in all protected 

activity centers treated for fire risk abatement. (See monitoring guidelines)

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-3 

Steep Slopes (Mixed conifer and pine-oak forests outside protected activity 

centers with slopes greater than 40% that have not been logged within the 

past 20 years): No seasonal restrictions apply.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-F, FW-WFPS-2 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

14

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-3 

Treat fuel accumulations to abate fire risk. 

 - Use combinations of thinning trees less than 9 inches in diameter, 

mechanical fuel removal, and prescribed fire. 

 - Retain woody debris larger than 12 inches in diameter, snags, clumps of 

broadleafed woody vegetation, and hardwood tress larger than 10 inches 

in diameter at the root collar. 

 - Pre and post treatment monitoring should occur within all steep slopes 

treated for fire risk abatement. (See monitoring guidelines)

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-3 

Reserved Lands (Wilderness, Research Natural Areas, Wild and Scenic 

Rivers, and Congressionally Recognized Wilderness Study Areas): Allow 

prescribed fire where appropriate.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

65-3 

Mixed Conifer and Pine-oak Forests (See glossary definition): Manage to 

ensure a sustained level of owl nest/roost habitat well distributed across the 

landscape. Create replacement owl nest/roost habitat where appropriate while 

providing a diversity of stand conditions across the landscape to ensure 

habitat for a diversity of prey species.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-3 

The following table displays the minimum percentage of restricted area which 

should be managed to have nest/roost characteristics. The minimum mixed 

conifer restricted area includes 10% at 170 basal area and an additional 

amount of area at 150 basal area. The additional area of 150 basal area is 

+10% in BR-E and +15% in all other recovery units. The variables are for 

stand averages and are minimum threshold values and must be met 

simultaneously. In project design, no stands simultaneously meeting or 

exceeding the minimum threshold values should be reduced below the 

threshold values unless a district-wide or larger landscape analysis of 

restricted areas shows that there is a surplus of restricted area acres 

simultaneously meeting the threshold values. Management should be 

designed to create minimum threshold conditions on project areas where 

there is a deficit of stands simultaneously meeting minimum threshold 

conditions unless the district-wide or larger landscape analysis shows there is 

a surplus.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

15

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-4 

This table has been modified to contain only information pertinent to the 

Coconino National Forest. Variable Mixed Conifer Pine-Oak Restricted Area 

% 10% +15% 10% Stand Averages for: Basal Area 170 150 150 18 inch + 

trees/ac 20 20 20 Oak Basal Area NA NA 20 Percent total existing 12-18" 10 

10 15 18-24" 10 10 15 24+" 10 10 15

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-4 

Attempt to mimic natural disturbance patterns by incorporating natural 

variation, such as irregular tree spacing and various patch sizes, into 

management prescriptions.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-4 Maintain all species of native trees in the landscape including early seral 

species.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-4 Allow natural canopy gap processes to occur, thus producing horizontal 

variation in stand structure.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-4 

Emphasize uneven-aged management systems. However, both even-aged 

and unevenaged systems may be used where appropriate to provide variation 

in existing stand structure and species diversity. Existing stand conditions will 

determine which system is appropriate.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-4 

Extend rotation ages for even-aged stands to greater than 200 years. 

Silvicultural prescriptions should explicitly state when vegetative manipulation 

will cease until rotation age is reached.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-4 Save all trees greater than 24 inches dbh.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-4 In pine-oak forests, retain existing large oaks and promote growth of additional 

large oaks.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-4 

Encourage prescribed and prescribed natural fire to reduce hazardous fuel 

accumulation. Thinning from below may be desirable or necessary before 

burning to reduce ladder fuels and the risk of crown fire.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

16

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-5 

Retain substantive amounts of key habitat components: 

 - Snags 18 inches in diameter and larger 

 - Down logs over 12 inches midpoint diameter

 - Hardwoods for retention, recruitment, and replacement of large hardwoods

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-5 

Riparian Areas: Emphasize maintenance and restoration of healthy riparian 

ecosystems through conformance with forest plan riparian standards and 

guidelines. Management strategies should move degraded riparian vegetation 

toward good condition as soon as possible. Damage to riparian vegetation, 

stream banks, and channels should be prevented.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

65-5 

Domestic Livestock Grazing: Implement forest plan forage utilization 

standards and guidelines to maintain owl prey availability, maintain potential 

for beneficial fire while inhibiting potential destructive fire, maintain and restore 

riparian ecosystems, and promote development of owl habitat. Strive to attain 

good to excellent range conditions.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

65-5 Old-growth: Except where otherwise noted, implement forest plan old-growth 

standards and guidelines to maintain and promote development of owl habitat.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4, FW-WFPDC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

17

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-5 

Apply ecosystem approaches to manage for landscape diversity mimicking 

natural disturbance patterns, incorporating natural variation in stand conditions 

and retaining special features such as snags and large trees, utilizing 

appropriate fires, and retention of existing old-growth in accordance with forest 

plan old-growth standards and guidelines.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-4, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-5, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-4, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-7, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-3, FW-WFPDC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

65-7 Survey the management analysis area prior to habitat modifying activities 

including a 1/2 mile beyond the boundary.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

65-7 

Establish, and delineate on a map, a post-fledging family area that includes 

six nesting areas per pair of nesting goshawks for known nest sites, old nest 

sites, areas where historical data indicates goshawks have nested there in the 

past, and where goshawks have been repeatedly sighted over a two year or 

greater time period but no nest sites have been located.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-14

65-7 

Manage for uneven-age stand conditions for live trees and retain live reserve 

trees, snags, downed logs, and woody debris levels through out woodland, 

ponderosa pine, mixed conifer and spruce-fir forest cover types. Manage for 

old age trees such that as much old forest structure as possible is sustained 

over time across the landscape. Sustain a mosaic of vegetation densities 

(overstory and understory), age classes and species composition across the 

landscape. Provide foods and cover for goshawk prey.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-All-DC-4, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-9, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-8, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-1, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-12, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-2, FWTerrERU-SF-DC-1, FWTerrERU-SF-DC-10

65-7 Limit human activity in nesting areas during the breeding season.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-I, FW-WFPDC-11, FW-WFP-G-11, FWWFP-G-2, FW-WFP-G-8, FWWFP-MgtApp-E, FW-WFPMgtApp-F 

65-7 Manage the ground surface layer to maintain satisfactory soil conditions i.e. to 

minimize soil compaction; and to maintain hydrologic and nutrient cycles.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-DC-2, 

FW-Soil-DC-3, FW-Soil-DC-4, 

FW-Soil-G-2, FW-Soil-O-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

18

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-7 

When activities conducted in conformance with these standards and 

guidelines may adversely affect other threatened, endangered, or sensitive 

species or may conflict with other established recovery plans or conservation

agreements; consult with US Fish and Wildlife Service to resolve the conflict.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPS-1 

65-8 

Emphasize maintenance and restoration of healthy riparian ecosystems 

through conformance with forest plan riparian standards and guidelines. 

Management strategies should restore degraded riparian areas to good 

condition as soon as possible. Damage to riparian vegetation, stream banks, 

and channels should be prevented.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Rip-AllDC-3, FW-Rip-All-DC-5, FW-RipAll-G-1, FW-Rip-All-G-2, FWRip-All-G-3, FW-Rip-All-MgtAppA 

65-8 

Post-fledging family areas (PFA) will be approximately 600 acres in size. Postfledging family areas will include the nest sites and consist of the habitat most 

likely to be used by the fledglings during their early development.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-14

65-9 

Establish a minimum of three nest areas and three replacement nest areas 

per postfledging family area. The nest areas and replacement nest areas 

should be approximately 30 acres in size. A minimum total of 180 acres of 

nest areas should be identified within each post-fledging family area.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-14

65-9 

Nest site selection will be based first on using active nest sites followed by the 

most recently used historical nest areas. When possible, all historical nest 

areas should be maintained.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-14

65-9 Manage for nest replacement sites to attain sufficient quality and size to 

replace the three suitable nest sites.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-14

65-9 

General: Snags are 18" or larger DBH and 30 feet or larger in height, downed 

logs are 12 inches in diameter and at least 8 feet long, woody debris is 3 

inches or larger on the forest floor, canopy cover is measured with vertical 

crown projection on average across the landscape.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-5, FWTerrERU-SF-DC-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

19

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-9 

Spruce-Fir: Canopy cover for mid-aged forest (VSS 4) should average 1/3 

60% and 2/3 40%, mature forest (VSS 5) should average 60+%, and old forest 

(VSS 6) should average 60+%. Maximum opening size is 1 acre with a 

maximum width of 125 feet. Provide two groups of reserve trees per acre with 

six trees per group when opening size exceeds 0.5. Leave at least 3 snags, 5 

downed logs, and 10-15 tons of woody debris per acre.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-SF-DC-7 

65-10

Mixed Conifer: Canopy cover for mid-aged forest (VSS 4) should average 1/3 

60+% and 2/3 40+%, mature forest (VSS 5) should average 50+%, and old 

forest (VSS 6) should average 60+%. Maximum opening size is up to 4 acres 

with a maximum width of up to 200 feet. Retain one group of reserve trees per 

acre of 3-5 trees per group for openings greater than 1 acre in size. Leave at 

least 3 snags, 5 downed logs, and 10-15 tons of woody debris per acre.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-1, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-1, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2 

65-10

Ponderosa Pine: Canopy Cover for mid-aged forest (VSS 4) should average 

40+%, mature forest (VSS 5) should average 40+%, and old forest (VSS 6) 

should average 40+%. Opening size is up to 4 acres with a maximum width of 

up to 200 feet. One group of reserve trees, 3-5 trees per group, will be left if 

the opening is greater than an acre in size. Leave at least 2 snags per acre, 3 

downed logs per acre, and 5-7 tons of woody debris per acre.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-5 

65-10

General: Provide for a healthy sustainable forest environment for the postfledging family needs of goshawks. The principle difference between within 

the post-fledging family area and outside the post-fledging family area is the 

higher canopy cover within the post-fledging family area and smaller opening 

size within the post-fledging family area. Vegetative Structural Stage 

distribution and structural conditions are the same within and outside the postfledging family area.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-9, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-8, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-12, FWTerrERU-SF-DC-10

65-10 General: Provide unique nesting habitat conditions for goshawks. Important 

features include trees of mature to old age with high canopy cover.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-DC-4, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-9, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-8, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-12, FWTerrERU-SF-DC-10, FW-WFPG-14

65-11

Spruce-fir, Mixed Conifer and Ponderosa Pine Cover Types: The nesting area 

contains only mature to old forest (VSS 5 & 6) having a canopy cover 

(measured vertically) between 50-70% with mid-aged VSS 6 trees 200-300 

years old. Non-uniform spacing of trees and clumpiness is desirable.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-9, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-8, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-12, FWTerrERU-SF-DC-10
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

20

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-11

Limit human activities in or near nest sites and post-fledging family area's 

during the breeding season so that goshawk reproductive success is not 

affected by human activities.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-I, FW-WFPDC-11, FW-WFP-G-11, FWWFP-G-8, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-F

65-11

Low intensity ground fires are allowed at any time in all forested cover types, 

but high intensity crown fires are not acceptable in the post-fledging family

area or nest areas. Avoid burning the entire home range of a goshawk pair in 

a single year. For fires planned in the occupied nest area, a fire management 

plan should be prepared. The fire management plan should minimize the risk 

of goshawk abandonment while low intensity ground fire burns in the nesting 

area. Prescribed fire within nesting areas should be planned to move with 

prevailing winds away from the nest tree to minimize smoke and risk of crown 

fire developing and driving the adults off or consuming the nest tree.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WFPG-2, FW-WFP-G-9 

65-11

Manage road densities at the lowest level possible. Where timber harvesting 

has been prescribed to achieve desired forest condition, use small, skid trails 

in lieu of roads.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-RdsFac-DC2, FW-RdsFac-DC-3, FWRdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-D, FW-WFP-G-13

65-12 Give priority to maintaining structures for threatened and endangered species.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-S-1 

65-12

Protect occupied Cimicifuga arizonica habitat. Restrict ground disturbing 

activities within the habitat and provide shade needed for perpetuation of the 

species. Fence and/or relocate trails where necessary to protect occupied 

habitat.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-G-10, FW-WFP-G-2, 

FW-WFP-G-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

21

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

65-12

Consult and cooperate with Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD) to at 

least achieve habitat management goals and objectives specified in the 

Arizona Wildlife and Fisheries Comprehensive Plans and strategic plans. 

Work with AGFD to fully consider opportunities for increasing habitat capacity 

above the objectives specified in the Comprehensive Plans and strategic 

plans. Where habitat capacity can reasonably be increased above the 

objectives specified in the Comprehensive Plan without adversely affecting 

other resources and uses, work with AGFD to fully consider these 

opportunities. Implement where determined appropriate through the 

environmental analysis process. Cooperate with the Fish and Wildlife Service 

and other agencies and organizations as the need arises. Cooperate with 

AGFD in evaluating proposals for reintroducing extirpated species into 

suitable habitat and on fish stocking and public access for fishing. Cooperate 

with the AGFD to prevent and/or remove unapproved introduced species. 

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A 

65-12 In cooperation with AGFD pursue the possibility of a Sikes Act program to 

provide user funds for habitat improvement.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A 

66

Provide timely public information about closures, fire danger, and other 

needed information to the AGFD for use in preparation of annual hunt 

brochures and in weekly news releases during hunting season.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-B, FW-WFPMgtApp-C 

66 Improve vegetation conditions through seeding a mixture of species of grass, 

forbs, forage, and browse species desirable to wildlife.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-G-3, FW-WFPDC-1, FW-WFP-DC-3, FW-WFPDC-5, FW-WFP-DC-8, FW-WFPG-3, FW-WFP-MgtApp-D 

66 Improve forage conditions by using prescribed fire where environmental 

analysis shows beneficial effects and in line with approved burning plans.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-TerrERU-AllG-1, FW-TerrERU-All-MgtApp-A, 

FW-WFP-G-3 

66

Manage forage to increase threatened and endangered species and 

management indicator species where it is determined appropriate through the 

IRM and NEPA process.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-1, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-DC-3, 

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2, 

FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFPMgtApp-D 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

22

Wildlife and Fish

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

66 Improve T&E and sensitive species habitat. Improvement projects give priority 

to recovery of T&E species. Conform to approved recovery plans.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-O-1, FW-WFP-S-1 

66

Develop wildlife waters where needed in accordance with approved plans and 

fence where necessary to protect wildlife values. Waters in openings shall be 

located not more than one-quarter mile from the edge of an opening.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-ConstWat-DC-1, FWConstWat-DC-2, FW-ConstWatG-2, FW-Graz-G-6, FW-WFPDC-2, FW-WFP-DC-6, FW-WFPDC-8, FW-WFP-G-5

66 Construct raptor perch, roost, and nest structures where applicable to improve 

habitat.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-8, FW-WFP-G-3, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-B, FW-WFPMgtApp-D

66

Install structures, such as gates or barriers, necessary to manage roads to 

limit or restrict access into key big game winter range and bald eagle nesting 

and wintering areas. Follow with appropriate administration and enforcement.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-I, FW-RecAll-G-1, FW-WFP-DC-11, FWWFP-G-6, FW-WFP-G-8, FWWFP-MgtApp-F, FW-WFP-S-2 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

23

Range 

Range

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

66-1 

Forage use by grazing ungulates will be maintained at or above a condition 

which assures recovery and continued existence of threatened and 

endangered species.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-1, 

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-G-3 

66-1 

In consultation with US Fish and Wildlife Service, develop site-specific forage 

use levels. In the event that site-specific information is not available, average 

key species forage utilization in key forage monitoring areas by domestic 

livestock and wildlife should not exceed levels in the following table during the 

forage growing season.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-3, FW-Graz-G-1, 

FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPDC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFPDC-3, FW-WFP-DC-4, FW-WFPMgtApp-A 

67 Range cooperation with agencies and groups is encouraged. Coordinate 

range activities with outside, local, State and Federal agencies, and groups.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, FW-GrazMgtApp-B 

67

Permitted use and capacities are maintained in balance for the allotments by 

increasing or decreasing numbers of livestock, by changing the management 

intensity levels, and by initiating changes in livestock class, season of use, 

and rotation patterns.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-DC-3, 

FW-Graz-G-1, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, FW-GrazMgtApp-B 

67

Revise and update AMP'S at least every 10 years to the Regional standards in 

FSH 2209.21. Management systems are designed to provide multiple-use 

management. The integrated resource management (IRM) approach is used 

during the environmental analysis of AMP's. The scoping portion of IRM will 

include an interdisciplinary analysis with input from potentially affected and 

interested parties. Issues that are significant and need to be included in further 

analysis will be identified. As a minimum the following areas will be considered 

to determine whether they contain significant issues: range condition, riparian 

condition, watershed condition, economic feasibility, practicality of 

implementation, wildlife habitat, recreation opportunity spectrum, timber 

management, and resource access and travel management.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in plan 

component, but proposed 

revised plan includes 

additional direction related to 

this topic.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-GrazMgtApp-C 

68

Waterlots are left open to wildlife for free access except when controlling 

livestock distribution through water accessibility and when soil moisture 

conditions adversely affect fence stability.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-6 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

24

Range

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

68

During summer months, leave water in livestock troughs for wildlife use after 

domestic animals have been removed from the grazing unit. In winter months 

in key wildlife winter ranges, provide water where freezing will not damage 

facilities. Bubblers are used to prevent freezing.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-ConstWat-DC-1, FWConstWat-DC-2, FW-ConstWatG-2, FW-Graz-G-2, FW-Graz-G6, FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, FWGraz-MgtApp-B 

68

Salt is used to help achieve proper livestock grazing distribution. Permanent 

salt is not placed within 1/4 of a mile of the edge of any riparian area or tree 

plantation. Temporary salting may be approved if it will help to achieve a 

specific management objective for enhancement of riparian areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-5, FW-GrazMgtApp-A, FW-Graz-MgtApp-B 

68

Analyze range structural improvements to determine whether they are needed 

during the preparation of the AMP'S. Reconstruct only those improvements 

that are needed. Remove improvements no longer needed and restore the 

area as appropriate, e.g., old fence is picked up and removed, discontinued 

fences are completely removed, and ineffective stock tanks returned to 

production following transfer of water rights.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-GrazMgtApp-A, FW-Graz-MgtApp-B 

69 On open storage tanks and drinkers provide entry and escape ramps for 

wildlife.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-MgtApp-D, FW-GrazS-1 

69

When existing allotment boundary, Forest boundary, and water lot fences 

need to be reconstructed or new fences are built, they shall consist of four 

wires, with the top wire being at least 38 inches but no more than 42 inches 

above the ground. The bottom wire will be smooth twisted and at least 18 

inches above the ground. Highway right-of-way fences will meet highway 

fence standards.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-GrazMgtApp-A, FW-Graz-MgtApp-B, 

FW-WFP-G-5 

69

Interior fences in an allotment are generally three wire fences with the bottom 

wire smooth and conform to the above height restrictions. Install antelope 

passes, let-down fences, electric fences, or elk jumps wherever necessary to 

improve wildlife travelways.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-GrazMgtApp-A, FW-Graz-MgtApp-B, 

FW-WFP-G-5 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

25

Range

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

69

Evaluate proposed earthen stock tank sites for location, adequacy, soil 

suitability, efficient use of the water resource, and legal requirements. Design 

structures built in drainages to meet appropriate flood occurrence intervals. 

Assure that on new stock tanks appropriate documents for construction and 

water rights application are filed in a timely manner and according to State 

law.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-ConstWat-G-1, FW-GrazDC-2, FW-Graz-G-4, FW-GrazMgtApp-A, FW-Graz-MgtApp-B 

69

Establish woody riparian vegetation as defined in FSH 2509.23 in wet 

meadows and other riparian areas. Control livestock grazing through 

management and/or fencing to establish vegetation and eliminate overuse.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-Graz-G-7, FW-GrazMgtApp-A, FW-Graz-MgtApp-B 

Timber 

Timber

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

70

Monitor insect and disease activities on all lands annually, including both 

suitable and unsuitable. Evaluate the extent to which insect and disease 

control measures are needed to protect either the suitable or unsuitable areas.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-4, FW-Invas-DC-1, 

FW-Invas-DC-2, FW-InvasMgtApp-A 

70 Habitat requirements for threatened, endangered, and sensitive species take 

precedence over insect and disease control.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-G-2, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-G-4, FW-WFP-S-1 

70 Cuts are designed to eliminate or reduce dwarf mistletoe infections to 

manageable levels.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC2, FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-DC-4, FWTerrERU-MC-All-MgtApp-A, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-4, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-MgtApp-B 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

26

Timber

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

70

Establish and maintain stand diversity through ISM to provide suitable habitat 

for wildlife in lands suitable for timber production, while maintaining or 

enhancing timber resource production and timber age class distribution 

(regulation). See specific management areas for Standards and Guidelines.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC2, FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-WFP-DC1, FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-3 

70

Combine compartments to form an identifiable block approximately 10,000 

acres in size. A range of 8,000 to 12,000 acres is acceptable. Individual blocks 

may be larger or smaller if approved by the Forest Supervisor.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-6, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-5, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-9, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-1, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

27

Timber

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

70 Standards and Guidelines are applied on a 10K Block basis rather than on an 

individual timber sale or project basis.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-6, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-5, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-1, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3 

70-1 

Until the forest plan is revised, allocate no less than 20 percent of each 

forested ecosystem management area to old-growth as depicted in the table 

below.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

28

Timber

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

70-1 

In the long term, manage old-growth in patterns that provide for a flow of 

functions and interactions at multiple scales across the landscape through 

time.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4 

70-1 Allocations will consist of landscape percentages meeting old-growth 

conditions and not specific acres.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4 

70-1 

All analyses should be at multiple scales - one scale above and one scale 

below the ecosystem management areas. The amount of old-growth can be 

provided and maintained will be evaluated at the ecosystem management area 

level and be based on forest type, site capability, and disturbance regimes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

29

Timber

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

70-1 

Strive to create or sustain as much old-growth compositional, structural, and 

functional flow as possible over time at multiple-area scales. Seek to develop 

or retain old-growth function on at least 20 percent of the naturally forested 

area by forest type in any landscape.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4 

70-1 

Consider the effects of spatial arrangement on old-growth function, from 

groups to landscapes, including de facto allocations to old-growth such as 

goshawk nest sites, Mexican spotted owl protected activity centers, sites 

protected for species behavior associated with old-growth, wilderness, 

research natural areas, and other forest structures managed for old-growth 

function.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-12, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4, FW-WFPDC-7 

70-1 

In allocating old-growth and making decisions about old-growth management, 

use appropriate information about the relative risks to sustaining old-growth 

function at the appropriate scales, due to natural and human-caused events.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

30

Timber

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

70-2 

The Minimum Criteria for the Structural Attributes Used to Determine OldGrowth Forest Cover Type, Name Piñon;Juniper Interior Aspen Mixed-Species 

Englemann Spruce Sub Forest Cover Type, SAF Code 239 237 217 

210,211,216,219 206,209 Site Capability Potential Break Between Low and 

High Site 55 Minor 50 Douglas-fir 50 Englemann Spruce Site Low High Low 

High All Low High Low High 1. Live Trees in Main Canopy: Trees/Acres 

DBH/DRC Age (Years) 12 9” 150 30 12” 200 20 14” 180 20 18” 180 20 14” 100 

12 18” 150 16 20” 150 20 10” 140*/1 70** 30 14” 140*/1 70** 2. Variation in 

Tree Diameters (Yes or No) ND ND ND ND No ND ND ND ND 3. Dead Trees 

Standing Trees/Acre Size DBH/DRC Height (feet) Down Pieces/Acre Size 

(Diameter) Length (Feet) 0.5* 9” 8’ 2 9” 8’ 1 10” 10’ 2** 10” 10’ 1 14” 15’ 2 12” 

15’ 1 14” 25’ 2 12” 15’ ND 10” ND ND ND ND 2.5 14” 20’ 4 12” 16’ 2.5 16” 25’ 

4 12” 16’ 3 12” 20’ 5 12” 16’ 4 16” 30’ 5 12” 16’ 4. Tree Decadence Trees/Acre 

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5. Number of tree canopies SS/MS SS/MS 

SS/MS SS/MS SS SS/MS SS/MS SS/MS SS/MS 6. Total BA, Square 

Feet/Acre 6 24 70 90 ND 80 100 120 140 7. Total Canopy Cover, Percent 20 

35 40 50 50 50 60 60 70

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-AspMpl-DC-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-8, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-9, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-5, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-10, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-11, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-12, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-5, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-7, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-5, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-8, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-3, FW-TerrERUSF-DC-2, FW-TerrERU-SF-DC3, FW-TerrERU-SF-DC-7 

71 Wildlife habitat objectives for each 10K Block are evaluated on an individual 

stand basis as well as for the entire block.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-DC-3, FW-WFP-DC-4, 

FW-WFP-DC-5, FW-WFP-DC-6, 

FW-WFP-DC-7, FW-WFP-G-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

31

Timber

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

71

Evaluate the need for wildlife forage in the 10K Blocks using the Habitat 

Capability Index, other available data and professional judgment and, where 

needed, adjust prescriptions to obtain it. These areas are stands of up to 10 

acres with reduced GSL.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-DC-3, FW-WFP-G-3 

Watershed 

Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

71

Ensure compliance with PL 92-500 "Federal Water Pollution Control Act" and 

Arizona Water Quality Standards through the implementation of Best 

Management Practices (BMP) to prevent water quality degradation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-G-1, FW-Water-DC-6, 

FW-Water-DC-7, FW-Water-G-4, 

MA-LkMary-MgtApp-C 

71

Plan for appropriate filter strips adjacent to streamcourses and/or riparian 

areas, as determined through the IRM process. A filter strip is an area of 

vegetation and forest litter located adjacent to streamcourse and/or riparian 

areas for the purpose of filtering sediment, providing bank stability, and in 

tree/shrub ecosystems providing shade for fisheries habitat. The ability of the 

strip to trap and filter sediments is a function of the amount and type of 

material on the ground, and width and slope of the strip. The ability of the strip 

to provide shade over perennial streams is dependent on the height of the 

vegetation and orientation of the stream with respect to the sun. Filter strip 

widths provided below are for average ground cover conditions. Significant 

topographic changes, such as abrupt canyon edges may be used as 

boundaries for filter strips, as long as ground disturbing activities beyond the 

canyon walls do not influence water quality. The table below should be used 

as a guide for determining filter strip width. Erosion hazard is defined as the 

risk of erosion and sedimentation that is based on slope, soil type, and the 

amount and type of material on the ground that is able to trap eroded material.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-G-3, FW-Rip-AllMgtApp-A, FW-Rip-Strm-G-2, 

FW-Rip-Strm-MgtApp-A 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

32

Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

72

FILTER STRIP TABLE - NONRIPARIAN STREAMCOURSES Erosion Hazard 

Filter Strip Slope Distance Severe 1.5 chains on each side of streamcourse 

Moderate 1.0 chains on each side of streamcourse Slight 0.5 chains on each 

side of streamcourse 

 - Limited skidding may occur within the filter strip of nonriparian 

streamcourses as long as the ability to function as a filter strip is 

maintained. 

 - Landings, decking areas, machine piling, skid trails, and roads (except at 

designated crossings) are planned outside of the filter strip of nonriparian 

streamcourses.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-MgtApp-A, FW-RipStrm-G-2 

72

FILTER STRIP TABLE - RIPARIAN STREAMCOURSES Erosion Hazard 

Filter Strip Slope Distance Severe 2.0 chains on each side of streamcourse 

Moderate 1.5 chains on each side of streamcourse Slight 1.0 chains on each 

side of streamcourse 

 - Directional falling and end-lining of logs out of the filter strip without crossing 

the streamcourse may occur. 

 - Landings, decking areas, machine piling, limited skidding, skid trails, and 

roads (except at designated crossings) are planned outside of the filter 

strip of riparian streamcourses.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-G-3, FW-Rip-AllMgtApp-A 

72

Designate stream courses and riparian areas to receive protection during 

projects such as timber sales and road work. As a minimum, those streams 

shown on 7-1/2 minute quads as stream courses are evaluated for the need to 

be designated stream courses.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G-1, 

FW-Rip-All-G-3, FW-Rip-AllMgtApp-A, FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, 

FW-Rip-Strm-G-1, FW-Rip-StrmG-2, FW-Rip-Strm-MgtApp-A 

72 Existing wood debris in stream channels is not disturbed unless designated for 

removal as a special project to improve stream channel conditions.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Rip-AllDC-5, FW-Rip-Strm-DC-4 

72

Logging and other debris that gets into stream channels is removed to above 

the high water mark before winter rains and snows begin except when an 

environmental analysis shows that the debris can be effectively used to 

improve fisheries habitat.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G-1, 

FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, FW-WFP-G3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

33

Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

72

Locate new roads out of stream courses and water-collecting features such as 

swales. Relocate roads out of bottom positions and obliterate poorly located 

segments as they are identified.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G2, FW-RdsFac-G-5, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-J, FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, 

FW-Rip-Strm-G-1, FW-Rip-StrmG-2, FW-Rip-Strm-MgtApp-A 

72 Provide adequate road drainage to prevent concentrated flow and 

sedimentation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-2, FW-RdsFacG-2, FW-RdsFac-G-5, FW-RipStrm-G-1 

72 Maintain at least 80 percent of the potential crown cover in the riparian area.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Rip-AllDC-5, FW-Rip-All-G-1, FW-RipAll-G-2, FW-Rip-Strm-G-1, FWRip-Strm-MgtApp-A, FW-WaterDC-3 

72-1 

Use the following BMP techniques to minimize sedimentation from road 

construction and reconstruction: 

 - Outsloped road surface; 

 - Leadout ditches and relief culverts; 

 - Energy dissipators on culverts; 

 - Vegetating cut and fill slopes; 

 - Riprap installation; 

 - Rolling grade.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G2, FW-Soil-G-1, FW-Water-DC-3, 

FW-Water-G-4 

73

Inventory riparian communities and areas capable of supporting riparian 

species by the end of the first decade. Channel condition and aquatic habitat 

condition will be included in the survey. Plan and design projects in areas of 

unsatisfactory or degraded condition to promote channel and streambank 

stability and to improve flow and timing of water. Meet or exceed eighty 

percent of Regional requirements above the Rim and ninety percent below the 

Rim by 2030. Manage to achieve at least 25 percent of the currently 

unsatisfactory riparian areas will be in satisfactory condition by 2000.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-G-1, FW-Rip-All-G-2, 

FW-Water-G-4, FW-Water-G-5 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

34

Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

73

As information is available, develop inventory of important groundwater 

recharge areas. Evaluate management practices to assure that recharge 

potential is maintained.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Rip-AllDC-2, FW-Rip-All-DC-3, FWWater-DC-2, FW-Water-DC-3, 

FW-Water-DC-5 

73

Inspect areas proposed to be treated with chemical agents such as pesticides 

and herbicides to ensure that surface or ground water contamination does not 

occur.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-G-1, FW-WaterMgtApp-J 

73

Evaluate the need to monitor water quality from areas disturbed by 

management and use activities. Conduct monitoring where needed to assure 

compliance with the Arizona State Water Quality Standards and P.L. 92-500.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-G-1, FW-Water-G-4, 

FW-Water-G-5, FW-WaterMgtApp-K 

73

Conduct water quality monitoring of primary contact recreation sites to 

standards of FSM 2540 and Arizona Water Quality Standards for full body 

contact waters (swimming and wading). Conduct monitoring as necessary to 

assure compliance with standards for aquatic life and wildlife where known 

problems are occurring.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-AllG-1, FW-Water-DC-1, FWWater-DC-7, FW-Water-G-4, 

FW-Water-MgtApp-K 

73 Evaluate watershed condition for its effect on turbidity.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Water-DC-1, FW-Water-DC2, FW-Water-G-4, FW-WaterMgtApp-J 

74

Maintain close working relations with the City of Flagstaff to ensure 

coordination, cooperation, and compliance with permit conditions for the Inner 

Basin, Upper and Lower Lake Mary, Lake Mary Well Field, and Woody 

Mountain Well Field.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-InBsn-MgtApp-A, MALkMary-MgtApp-A, MA-LkMaryMgtApp-B, MA-LkMary-MgtAppC 

74 Take action to legally protect Forest uses of needed waters.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Water-G-3, FW-WaterMgtApp-D, FW-Water-MgtApp-F 

74

File for water rights on appropriable waters following State procedures. 

Complete all documentation required for the adjudication process by dates 

specified by the courts.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Water-G-3, FW-WaterMgtApp-D, FW-Water-MgtApp-E, 

FW-Water-MgtApp-F, FW-WaterMgtApp-G 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

35

Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

74

Take action to obtain instream flow water rights for fish, wildlife, recreation, 

and channel maintenance purposes: 

 - For nonappropriable water uses, check for compliance with Arizona Revised 

Statutes and R-3 guidelines. 

 - Participate in State water right adjudications. 

 - Secure water rights through purchase or severance-and-transfer when 

additional sources are needed. 

 - Maintain and update annually an inventory of all water uses on the Forest 

(WURR).

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Water-G-3, FW-WaterMgtApp-E, FW-Water-MgtApp-F, 

FW-Water-MgtApp-G, FWWater-MgtApp-H, FW-WaterMgtApp-I 

74 Maintain current satisfactory watershed conditions and improve any 

unsatisfactory conditions to satisfactory by 2020.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Water-DC-1, FW-Water-DC2, FW-Water-G-1, FW-Water-G2, FW-Water-G-4, FW-WaterMgtApp-C 

74

Implement resource improvement projects that are cost-effective and/or are 

beneficial for maintaining and improving water quality, quantity, and soil 

productivity. Priority is given to vegetative versus structural measures. On 

those areas where grazing occurs, projects are only done where there is an 

approved AMP. Treated areas are protected by grazing management, fencing, 

and/or other methods, until recovery is satisfactory. On those areas where 

grazing occurs, management will be evaluated and modified if necessary to be 

consistent with the objectives of the improvement project. In project planning 

evaluate the need for planting nonpalatable herbaceous and woody vegetation 

to discourage concentration of elk and livestock.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-Graz-G-3, 

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-Graz-G-7,

FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, FW-GrazMgtApp-B, FW-Soil-DC-2, FWSoil-G-1, FW-Soil-G-2, FWWater-G-4 

75

Implement emergency fire rehabilitation measures where necessary to protect 

soil and water resources from intolerable losses or to prevent unacceptable 

downstream damage.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Eco-MgtApp-A, FW-Fire-G2, FW-Fire-MgtApp-B, FW-SoilDC-3, FW-Soil-G-2, FW-WaterDC-3, FW-Water-G-4 

75

Enhance watershed condition by obliterating roads causing resource damage. 

A total of 400 miles of roads will be obliterated by the end of the first decade 

(average of 40 miles annually).

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G2, FW-RdsFac-G-5, FW-RdsFacG-6, FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-J, FWRdsFac-O-1, FW-Soil-O-1, FWWater-G-4
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

36

Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

75

Soil information from a Level 3 TES is intended for: 

 - Broad resource, land management, and activity planning at Regional, 

Forest, and District levels. 

 - Low investment, extensive land management projects such as timber sales 

and range allotment analysis that do not require site specific, precise, 

highly detailed soil interpretations. 

 - The initial identification of areas that will require additional specific soil 

information necessary for project level work as outlined in the Plan.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-MgtApp-A 

Minerals 

Minerals

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

76

There will be no surface occupancy where listed endangered species exist, on 

slopes greater than 40 percent, on areas where the VQO is foreground 

Retention, on the Montezuma Castle Backdrop Area, or the portion of 

Deadman Wash basin adjacent to Wupatki National Monument. On a case-bycase basis, minor exceptions, such as a buried pipeline, may be considered 

provided the overall foreground Retention VQO is met.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Minerals-G-3, FW-MineralsG-4, FW-Scenic-DC-10, FWScenic-DC-2, FW-Scenic-G-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

37

Forest Land Management Plan (LMP)/Special Uses/Lands 

Forest Land Management Plan (LMP)/Special Uses/Lands

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

79

New corridors will avoid wildernesses, RNA's, geological and botanical areas, 

Elden Environmental Study Area, and the ponderosa pine and mixed conifer 

vegetation types. New corridors will be evaluated for their potential impacts on 

T&E habitats.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-1, FWSpecUse-G-5, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-G-3, MA-MtElden-G-6, 

SA-RNABotGeo-DC-5, SARNABotGeo-G-1, SARNABotGeo-G-5, SA-Wild-G-1

80 New corridors are managed to maintain current resource protection and 

outputs to the degree possible.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-2, FWSpecUse-G-5 

80 Powerlines and towers are built (construction or reconstruction) to 

specifications compatible with raptor use.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-2, FWSpecUse-DC-3, FW-SpecUse-G1, FW-SpecUse-G-5

80

Emphasize coordination of research projects from entities, such as 

universities, that want authorizations. Ensure protection of resource values 

and eliminate duplication of projects.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-E 

85

Communities -- There are lands adjacent to or within the communities such as 

Flagstaff, Sedona, Cottonwood, and Camp Verde. Criteria are: 

 - Non-National Forest lands in and adjacent to the communities will generally 

not be acquired. 

 - National Forest lands identified as needed and suitable for community 

expansion will not be committed to uses incompatible with prospective 

community needs.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1, MA-HouseMtnS-2, MA-HouseMtn-S-3, MAOakCrk-S-4, MA-OakCrk-S-5, 

MA-RedRock-S-7, MA-RedRockS-8, MA-SedN-S-4, MA-SedN-S5, MA-Walnut-S-2 

85

Recreation Use and Development Areas -- These are lands within existing or 

potential recreation sites or locations of concentrated public use. Criteria are: 

 - Acquire private lands to achieve a landownership pattern that adequately 

provides for present and foreseeable public needs, such as recreation 

development, landscape protection, pollution prevention, access to water 

and public properties, and open space. 

 - Acquire private lands or the control of unique or outstanding natural features 

or significant waters.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

38

Forest Land Management Plan (LMP)/Special Uses/Lands

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

86

Wildlands with Large Non-Forest Ownerships -- These are Forest lands in 

checkerboard patterns or otherwise intermingled with large private 

landowners. Criteria are: 

 - Acquire into Forest ownership to achieve cost efficient management of 

Forest lands and to maintain them as Forest type lands. 

 - Review acquisition and base-in-exchange plans when private land uses 

change from wildland and undeveloped uses towards more intensive uses. 

 - Pursue acquisition where special resource needs such as key wildlife 

habitat or key public recreation sites are identified. 

 - Acquire threatened and endangered species habitat if adjacent Forest lands 

do not provide adequate habitat. 

 - Acquire riparian habitat, where adjacent riparian areas are in Forest 

ownership.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-LndAdj-DC-1, FW-LndAdj-G1 

86

Wildlands with Small Non-Forest Ownership -- These areas where ownership 

patterns vary from occasional scattered private holdings to small privately held 

tracts. Criteria are: 

 - Acquire where necessary to correct or discourage land uses not compatible 

with adjacent Forest uses. 

 - Acquire where ownership consolidation substantially improves 

management, is cost efficient, and enhances public use. 

 - Special consideration is given to cooperators, such as range permittees, 

City, County, and State, where acquisition would not be in the best interest 

of continuing their existing operations. 

 - Acquire where special resource needs such as key wildlife habitat or key 

public recreation sites are identified. 

 - Acquire threatened and endangered species habitat if adjacent Forest lands 

do not provide adequate habitat. 

 - Acquire riparian habitat, where adjacent riparian areas are in Forest 

ownership.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-LndAdj-DC-1, FW-LndAdj-G1, MA-OakCrk-S-5 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

39

Forest Land Management Plan (LMP)/Special Uses/Lands

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

86

Lands offered by the United States in a land exchange are tentatively 

classified as base-in-exchange. Currently, the Forest has 21,133 acres 

classified as base-in-exchange. Because local and physical conditions may 

change during the life of this plan, other lands may be considered for 

exchange. They will generally meet one or more of the following criteria: 

 - Lands needed to meet the needs of expanding communities; 

 - Isolated tracts or scattered parcels that cannot be efficiently managed; 

 - Lands that provide consolidation of the public lands; 

 - Lands that will improve management, benefit specific resources, or increase 

management efficiency; 

 - Lands that are necessary to meet overriding local, regional, and national 

public needs; 

 - Lands within the boundaries of incorporated communities or annexed 

thereto. 

 - Review base-in-exchange plans when private land uses change from 

wildland and undeveloped uses towards more intensive uses.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-2, MA-HouseMtnS-3, MA-OakCrk-S-5, MARedRock-S-8, MA-SedN-S-5 

Transport/Facilities 

Transport/Facilities

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

89

Manage road densities to achieve an average of 1.1 mile of open road per 

section in the woodland zone, such as pinyon-juniper, desert, and grassland 

vegetation types and an average of 2 miles of open road per section in the 

ponderosa pine/mixed conifer zone. These densities reflect all designated 

system roads in maintenance categories 2 through 5, but do not include 

Federal, State, and County systems. Temporary roads that are only for shortterm use and will then be fully obliterated and long term closure roads are not 

a part of the calculated density. In calculating densities by vegetative type do 

not include areas having legal or administrative restrictions on roads, e.g., 

wilderness and research natural areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacDC-4, FW-RdsFac-DC-5, FWRdsFac-G-6, FW-RdsFac-S-1 

89 Provide road signs for public service, direction, information, and safety.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-5, FW-RdsFacG-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

40

Transport/Facilities

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

89

Route markers on roads accepting or encouraging passenger car use will be 

wooden with the numbers displayed horizontally. Route markers on roads 

recommended for high clearance vehicles will be fiberglass posts with the 

numbers displayed vertically.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-MgtApp-C, FWRdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFac-DC5, FW-RdsFac-G-3, FW-RecDisp-G-1 

90

Conduct trail condition surveys, prepare trail maintenance schedules, and sign 

trails on a "safety first" basis. Maintain trails to planned standards. Promote 

the Adopt-a-Trail Program. Trail maintenance intensity and schedules are 

related to the ROS class.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-RecTrails-DC-1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC3, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, FW-RecTrails-MgtApp-D 

90

Coordinate with State, County, and communities' park departments to connect 

Forest trails with parks and green-belt corridors, when it is mutually beneficial, 

provides better public service and development is compatible with other 

resource management.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-MgtApp-C, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-E, MA-FlagN-DC-2, MASedN-DC-2, MA-VerdeV-DC-3, 

MA-VerdeV-MgtApp-A 

90

Horse and pack stock are not allowed on these trails: 

 - Elden Lookout Trail; 

 - Oldham Trail, the portion between Buffalo Park and the El Paso natural gas 

pipeline; 

 - Mount Humphrey's Trail and the Weatherford Trail above Doyle Saddle; 

 - Fay, Wilson Mountain, West Fork of Oak Creek, Devil's Bridge, and Boynton 

Canyon Trails within the Red Rock-Secret Mountain Wilderness. See the 

Plan maps for specific locations.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-FlagN-S-1, MA-InBsn-S-1, 

MA-MtElden-S-1, MA-OakCrk-S6, MA-Peaks-S-1, MA-Peaks-S3, MA-RedRock-S-9 

91

Locate new roads out of riparian areas and water collecting features such as 

swales. However, in wet meadows existing roads may also be reconstructed 

and maintained in accordance with Best Management Practices as defined in 

the Standards and Guidelines. Relocate or eliminate roads that are presently 

in these locations. Obliterate the poorly located segments. Cross 

streamcourses perpendicular to the flow to minimize bank disturbance and 

sediment production.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacG-1, FW-RdsFac-G-5 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

41

Protection 

Protection

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

92 Manage smoke from prescribed fires to meet legal standards and to provide 

for public safety.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Air-MgtApp-A, FW-AirMgtApp-B, FW-Fire-DC-1, FWFire-G-2

93

Work with homeowners associations and homeowners in the Urban Interface 

to plan and implement measures to reduce wildfire threats to life and property 

such as: 

 - Treating vegetation and fuels near homes. 

 - Providing road ingress and egress for emergency evacuation of personnel. 

 - Providing road access suitable for use by fire engines including places to 

turn engines around. 

 - Providing information to homeowners on measures they can take to reduce 

the threat of wildfire to their property. 

 - Providing adequate sources of water for use by fire engines for hose lays, to 

refill engines, and/or watertenders.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-WUI-DC1, FW-WUI-DC-2, FW-WUIMgtApp-A 

93

Urban Interface - The suppression objective is to hold fires to 10 acres or less 

per fire start. This zone is the urban interface and an area up to 10 miles long 

in a southwesterly direction from urban areas. Fires pose a threat to life and 

property. The zone has high priority for fuel treatment dollars. Prescribed fire, 

using planned ignitions, is used to accomplish fuel treatment and resource 

management objectives. Suppression tactics are selected that have the least 

impact on the land and meet the suppression objective.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUIDC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, FW-WUIDC-4 

94

Commercial Timber Lands - The suppression objective is to hold fires to 100 

acres or less per fire start. This zone consists of the remainder of the 

commercial timber land. Prescribed fire using both planned and unplanned 

ignitions is used to accomplish fuel treatment and resource management 

objectives. Suppression action gives top priority to protecting life and property, 

resource protection, and protection to private in-holdings and other 

landownership.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-5, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

42

Protection

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

94

PJ and Desert Grasslands - The suppression objective is to hold fires to less 

than 1,000 acres per fire start, to minimize suppression costs, and to provide 

for maximum personnel safety. In ponderosa pine stringers or other identified 

important wildlife habitat the suppression objective is 300 acres per fire or 

less. This zone consists of grassland, desert shrub, pinyon/juniper, some 

unsuitable and noncommercial timber land other than designated 

wildernesses. Prescribed fire using planned and unplanned ignitions is used to 

accomplish fuel treatment and other resource management objectives. 

Suppression action gives top priority to protecting life and property, and 

protection to private in-holdings and other landownership. Suppression 

methods are chosen that minimize impact on soils, water, and other 

resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-Grass-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-3, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-8 

94

Wilderness - Fires that are not a threat to areas outside the wilderness are 

allowed to burn naturally provided that prescribed conditions are met. 

Prescribed conditions to be met are found in Standards and Guidelines 

specific to wildernesses (MA 1).

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppC, SA-Wild-DC-2, SA-Wild-DC-4 

94

Oak Creek Canyon - The suppression objective is to hold fires to 10 acres or 

less and minimize threat to life and property when fires are a threat. When 

fires are not a threat to people or improvements, the suppression objective 

may be increased to 300 acres. Fires that are not a threat to people and/or 

improvements are managed to minimize cost and provide for maximum 

personnel safety. The threat to people and/or improvements is determined by 

the District Ranger, District FMO, or initial attack Incident Commander.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-WUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, 

FW-WUI-DC-4 

95 Suppress fires that threaten habitat of threatened and endangered, or 

sensitive species.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2 

96

Prescriptions for the use of prescribed fire for any purpose include measures 

to minimize smoke production when projects will impact smoke sensitive 

areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Air-DC-1, FW-Air-G-1, FWAir-G-2, FW-Fire-G-2 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

43

Protection

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

96

Monitor and document the effects on smoke sensitive areas of smoke from 

prescribed burning during the burning season. The purpose is to prevent 

smoke intrusions. Adjust the burning program as needed based upon the 

monitoring. The initial monitoring will be by aerial observation, photography 

from observation points, and ground observations. Monitoring may be daily or 

less frequent depending upon the amount of burning and atmospheric 

conditions.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Air-G-2 

96

Evaluate potential for smoke intrusions on airports, highways, and roads. 

Employ appropriate measures to provide for public safety by keeping smoke 

off of these types of facilities to the degree possible. Keep smoke warning 

signs posted on roads. If an intrusion occurs take cooperative action with 

appropriate law enforcement personnel to provide for public safety.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Air-DC-1, FW-Air-G-1, FWAir-MgtApp-A 

Management Area 1 - Wilderness 

Management Area 1 - Wilderness

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

105

Emphasize wilderness recreation and watershed condition while maintaining 

wilderness resource values. In order to accomplish this, some additional trail 

and trailhead development will be done, particularly in the Kachina Peaks, 

Red Rock-Secret Mountain, West Clear Creek, and Munds Mountain 

Wildernesses.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-DC-1, SA-Wild-DC-2, 

SA-Wild-DC-7, SA-Wild-G-1, SAWild-MgtApp-F 

105 Manage Visual Quality Objective (VQO) in wilderness as Preservation. No 

variation in this acreage is acceptable.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-ScenicDC-2, FW-Scenic-G-1, SA-WildG-1
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

44

Management Area 1 - Wilderness

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

105

Manage for a mix of Wilderness Opportunity Spectrum (WOS) classes with 

some areas, for example Fossil Springs and portions of Red Rock-Secret 

Mountain managed toward the primitive end of the WOS spectrum. 

Wildernesses are managed to maintain wilderness quality and to maintain use 

within capacity, with first priority for management efforts to the Kachina Peaks 

Wilderness. Where overuse problems are apparent or imminent, such as 

some WOS classes in Kachina Peaks, Red Rock/Secret Mountain, Wet 

Beaver, West Clear Creek, and Sycamore Canyon, use studies are 

undertaken and remedial action implemented to protect the resource. The 

study currently underway in the Kachina Peaks is continued and similar 

studies are undertaken in other areas. Possible corrective measures include 

the initiation of permit systems or seasonal closure of sensitive areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-DC-1, SA-Wild-DC-7, 

SA-Wild-DC-8, SA-Wild-G-1, SAWild-G-2, SA-Wild-G-3 

105

Manage to provide a quality experience for people while protecting wilderness 

resources. It may be necessary to limit numbers of people and/or horses and 

packstock in some instances. The majority of use in all areas is day use.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-DC-1, SA-Wild-DC-2, 

SA-Wild-DC-8, SA-Wild-G-1, SAWild-G-2, SA-Wild-G-3, SA-WildMgtApp-B, SA-Wild-S-1, SAWild-S-4

106 Implement "NO TRACE" program, providing educational information to users.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-MgtApp-B, SA-WildMgtApp-F, SA-Wild-MgtApp-G, 

SA-Wild-MgtApp-H

107

Implement corrective measures such as a wilderness permit system if overuse 

causes unacceptable resource damage. Overuse is determined from: 

 - Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) studies 

 - Range analyses 

 - Code-a-site inventories 

 - Professional judgment

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-G-1, SA-Wild-G-2, SAWild-MgtApp-A, SA-WildMgtApp-B 

107

Provide regular Wilderness Ranger patrol in wildernesses to the degree 

necessary to meet the standards for each area. If funding is limited, use 

volunteers to accomplish as much of this work as possible via the WIS 

program. Standard level trail maintenance is defined in the implementation 

schedules for each wilderness.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-MgtApp-A, SA-WildMgtApp-F, SA-Wild-MgtApp-G 

108 Stop motorized vehicle intrusions and firewood cutting.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-VolcanWd-MgtApp-B, SAWild-DC-6, SA-Wild-G-10
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

45

Management Area 1 - Wilderness

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

108 Consult with Native Americans on projects.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in plan 

component, but proposed 

revised plan includes 

additional direction related to 

this topic.

FW-Trbl-DC-1, FW-Trbl-G-2, 

FW-Trbl-MgtApp-A, FW-TrblMgtApp-B, SA-Wild-DC-5 

108 Foot traffic only on the Humphreys Peak Trail and from Humphreys Peak to 

Doyle Saddle along the ridge.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-InBsn-G-7, MA-InBsn-S-1, 

MA-Peaks-S-1, SA-Wild-S-4 

108 No horse or packstock use above timberline.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-InBsn-G-7, MA-InBsn-S-1, 

MA-Peaks-S-1, SA-Wild-S-4 

108 No overnight camping above timberline.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-InBsn-G-7, SA-Wild-S-4 

108

Use in the City of Flagstaff watershed (draining into Inner Basin) is limited to 

day-use foot traffic. The area may be closed if unacceptable damage occurs 

as determined by a degradation of water quality.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Water-G-4, MA-InBsn-G-7, 

MA-InBsn-S-1, MA-Peaks-S-1, 

MA-Peaks-S-3, SA-Wild-G-1

108 Protect Senecio franciscanus by an area closure.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-Peaks-S-1, SA-Wild-G-9, 

SA-Wild-S-3, SA-Wild-S-4, SAWild-S-5

108-1 Fire, under prescribed conditions, is allowed to play a natural role. Fire 

management strategies are prepared and implemented for all Wildernesses.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-C, SA-Wild-DC4, SA-Wild-G-1

108-2 

Manage as prescribed by Congress for Primitive attributes. Several 

inconsistencies exist, such as at Bell Rock, West Fork, Boynton Canyon and 

some places near private land. Make every effort to limit the degradation of 

Wilderness values. Where needed, take management actions in these places 

beyond levels normally associated with Wilderness management in order to 

protect visitor experience and resources. Near Secret Mountain and adjacent 

canyons, Sycamore Basin, upper Woods Canyon and portions of Jack's 

Canyon and Horse Mesa, the objective is a Pristine WOS setting.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, SA-Wild-DC1, SA-Wild-DC-8, SA-Wild-G-1 

108-2 Limit camping and recreation fires at or near trailheads and private lands as 

needed to protect resources, resident security and sanitation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-DC-1, SA-Wild-DC-2, 

SA-Wild-DC-9, SA-Wild-G-1, SAWild-MgtApp-H
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

46

Management Area 1 - Wilderness

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

108-2 Evaluate the need for additional limitations on visitor use at Boynton Canyon 

and the West Fork of Oak Creek.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-DC-7, SA-Wild-DC-8, 

SA-Wild-G-2, SA-Wild-G-3, SAWild-MgtApp-A, SA-WildMgtApp-B, SA-Wild-S-1, SAWild-S-2

108-3 Camping and recreation fires are prohibited in Boynton Canyon.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-RedRock-G-4, SA-Wild-DC1, SA-Wild-DC-8, SA-Wild-G-1 

108-3 

Camping is prohibited throughout the West Fork of Oak Creek, except in 

designated campsites. Recreation fires in the West Fork of Oak Creek are 

prohibited.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-S-2, SA-Wild-G-1 

108-3 In wilderness group size limit is generally 12 or fewer persons.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-S-1 

108-3 

For the West Fork of Oak Creek Canyon establish a reservation only permit 

system for overnight camping. This system should include the following: no 

camping within 2.5 miles of the confluence, no more than 5 camping areas, 

each camping are to accommodate 2-4 camping parties, camping party size to 

be generally 4 persons, camp areas to be located outside of spotted owl 

protected activity centers where possible, and total annual overnight use to be 

maintained at or less than 1997 use (approximately 1,300 persons).

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-G-1, SA-Wild-G-2 

108-4 Commercial tour activities should be limited to trails and campsites designated 

for such use.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-1, FWSpecUse-G-16, SA-Wild-DC-11, 

SA-Wild-S-2

108-4 

Commercial tours will be limited to Wilderness-dependent opportunities that 

cannot occur outside of Wilderness. Generally maintain or reduce current 

levels of commercial touring in Wildernesses.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-Wild-DC-11, SA-Wild-S-2 

108-4 

Encourage widespread understanding of the philosophy of Wilderness and 

support for its natural and social benefits. People should be prepared with 

appropriate equipment and information. Visitors should learn about sensitive 

ecological features, know their responsibility and act in a way that protects 

ecological systems.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-G-1, FW-InterpEdG-2, SA-Wild-DC-10, SA-WildDC-9, SA-Wild-G-5 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

47

Management Area 1 - Wilderness

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

109

The following is a general description of SLM in the Kachina Peaks, south side 

of Red Rock-Secret Mountain, South end of Sycamore Canyon, west end of 

West Clear Creek, and the west end of Wet Beaver Wildernesses. Develop 

and implement implementation schedules with annual updates. Develop a 

brochure for each wilderness, including a trail map. Administer a permit 

system, if one is implemented. Maintain all wilderness facilities to Condition 

Class I. Provide parking and toilet facilities at major trailheads. Install traffic 

counters at all trail heads. Implement WIS program. The goal is to protect 

wilderness values and provide a quality wilderness experience. Use 

volunteers as much as possible, particularly during peak season to patrol, pick 

up litter, break up fire rings, restore damaged sites, contact the public, and 

maintain trail condition logs.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-3, FW-Rec-TrailsG-1, SA-Wild-DC-1, SA-WildDC-8, SA-Wild-DC-9, SA-WildG-1, SA-Wild-G-2, SA-WildMgtApp-A, SA-Wild-MgtApp-B, 

SA-Wild-MgtApp-F, SA-WildMgtApp-G 

109

The following is a general description of management in the Fossil Springs, 

Munds Mountain, Strawberry Crater, east end of West Clear Creek, east end 

of Wet Beaver, north portion of Sycamore Canyon, and the north side of Red 

Rock- Secret Mountain Wildernesses. Use volunteers as much as possible, 

particularly during peak season to patrol, pick up litter, break up fire rings, 

restore damaged sites, contact the public, and maintain trail condition logs. 

Service trail heads as necessary. Public safety and resource protection are 

emphasized. When permanent damage to the resource is apparent or 

imminent, measures are taken to both limit and distribute visitor use in 

wilderness by permit system or other methods. Maintain facilities and signs to 

protect the investment only.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, SA-Wild-G5, SA-Wild-G-7, SA-WildMgtApp-F, SA-Wild-MgtApp-G, 

SA-Wild-O-1 

110

Protect 325 acres of alpine areas on the San Francisco Mountains to improve 

habitat for Senecio franciscanus by closing the area during snow-free periods. 

Access is limited to designated trails.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-Peaks-S-1, SA-Wild-G-9, 

SA-Wild-S-3, SA-Wild-S-4, SAWild-S-5

111

Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit applications to 

determine the potential effect increased emissions from major stationary 

sources will have on air quality related values (AQRV's) in National Forest 

Class I areas. Protect the current status of AQRV's in the Sycamore Canyon 

Wilderness Class I Airshed. Treat other wildernesses in the same manner as 

Class I Airsheds. Predict the impacts of air pollution generating activities with 

current and cost effective modeling techniques.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Air-DC-1, FW-Air-MgtApp-B 

111 Monitor specific air pollutant and meteorological parameters necessary for 

determining air quality in Class I areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Air-DC-1, FW-Air-G-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

48

Management Area 1 - Wilderness

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

111

In the Class I Airsheds, maintain high quality visual conditions. The form, line, 

texture, and color of characteristic landscapes is clearly distinguishable when 

viewed as middleground. Cultural resources and ecosystems remain 

unmodified by air pollutants. Determine baseline information and the 

background condition of the above AQRV's, and specify limits of acceptable 

change that will affirmatively protect these values in Class I Airsheds.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Air-DC-1, FW-Air-G-1, FWAir-MgtApp-B, FW-Eco-DC-1, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-1 

111 Fire under prescribed conditions is allowed to play a natural role in wilderness.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FW-FireMgtApp-C, SA-Wild-DC-4

112

Fires that are not a threat to areas outside the wilderness are allowed to run 

their natural course provided that the following prescribed conditions and 

situations are met: 

 - Fuel levels permit a sound natural fire program to be implemented. 

 - Fire forces are available in sufficient numbers to contain the fire(s) during 

the period between the afternoon fire weather forecast and 10 a.m. the 

next day. 

 - Fire behavior, both existing and predicted is such that fire forces are 

expected to be able to stop the spread of the fire(s) in any direction. 

 - Fuels in the path of the fire(s) are of an amount, size, and arrangement 

that expected fire intensity will not cause unacceptable damage to the 

wilderness resource. 

 - The fire creates a mosaic vegetation pattern. Fires outside of these limits 

are unacceptable. The following ratio of burned to unburned acres are 

achieved: % Burned % Unburned 25 to 75 75 to 25 

 - Fires that do not meet prescribed conditions are declared wildfires and 

suppressed in accordance with the following general suppression 

objectives. More specific suppression objectives for portions of the 

wildernesses may be developed as a part of the implementation 

schedules. 

 - Kachina Peaks--10 acres; Kendrick Mountain--10 acres; Strawberry Crater-- 

300 acres; Red Rock-Secret Mountain--300 acres; Munds Mountain--300 

acres; West Clear Creek--300 acres; Wet Beaver Creek--300 acres; Fossil 

Springs--300 acres; Sycamore Canyon--1,000 acres; 

 - In areas where unnatural fuel buildups have occurred because of the 

suppression of natural fires, prescribed fire using planned ignitions is used 

to restore a natural fuel condition so that fire can be allowed to play a 

natural role.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FW-FireMgtApp-C, SA-Wild-DC-4 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

49

Management Area 1 - Wilderness

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

112

Fires that exceed prescription are suppressed using tactics that minimize 

impact

on wildernesses.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, SA-Wild-G-1 

112 Fires in the RNA's are allowed to burn undisturbed unless they threaten the

uniqueness of the area.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

SA-RNABotGeo-DC-2, SARNABotGeo-G-2

Management Area 2 - Verde Wild and Scenic River 

Management Area 2 - Verde Wild and Scenic River 

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

115-1 

Manage for the following indicator species:

 ̈ Macroinvertebrates

 ̈ Yellow breasted chat

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less Than 40 Percent Slopes 

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

117

Manage for timber production using Integrated Stand Management (ISM) to 

achieve diverse and healthy stands. Manage to reduce or eliminate dwarf 

mistletoe. Protect stands from unacceptable losses due to insects or diseases.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Invas-DC1, FW-Invas-G-1, FW-Invas-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-All-DC-4, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-4, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-MgtApp-B
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

50

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

117

Visual quality objectives are generally Modification and Partial Retention. 

Maximum Modification is allowed to manage insect or disease outbreaks or to 

harvest fire-killed timber. Acceptable variations in VQO classification acres are 

outlined in the Forest-wide Standards and Guidelines.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-2 

118

Manage at least 61,154 acres in the tentatively suitable timber lands for oldgrowth on a sustained basis to achieve at least 30,577 acres meeting oldgrowth conditions at all times.Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4

118

Manage the approximately 12,100 acres identified as the pine-aspen 

capability area for aspen, on a regulated, sustained-yield basis to maintain 

aspen as a component of the Forest. Feature a rotation to enhance firewood 

production and wildlife habitat. Use firewood sales to achieve regeneration by 

sprouting.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-Fprod-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-AspMpl-DC-1, FWTerrERU-AspMpl-DC-2, FWTerrERU-AspMpl-O-1 

119

Prohibit camping between Lockett Meadow Trailhead and the Inner Basin. 

The access road is managed as a trail and closed to vehicles, except that the 

City of Flagstaff may periodically be authorized to use it for special vehicles 

such as drill rigs if determined appropriate through environmental analysis.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-InBsn-DC-7, MA-InBsn-G-7, 

MA-Peaks-DC-4 

119

Manage the Mount Elden/Dry Lake Hills to maintain a semi-primitive 

nonmotorized ROS class. Build a trail system to make a loop trail from Buffalo 

Park over the Dry Lake Hills to the Mount Elden Trail, then through the Elden 

Environmental Study Area on the El Paso natural gas pipeline and back to 

Buffalo Park. The trails are for nonmotorized traffic only. The Mount Elden 

Lookout Trail and the portion of the Oldham trail between Buffalo Park and the 

El Paso natural gas pipeline are closed to horse and packstock. Trails in the 

system have standard level maintenance.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-RecTrails-DC-3, MA-FlagN-S-1, MAMtElden-DC-4, MA-MtElden-S-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

51

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

120

Seed behind intermediate timber harvests with mixes tailored to fit the site 

where additional forage is needed. Emphasize high production, shade 

tolerant, multigrowing season species that will not inhibit tree regeneration. Do 

not seed after the last intermediate harvest if tree regeneration will be 

inhibited. Do not seed after seed cuts. Where open meadows

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-Graz-DC-1, FW-Graz-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-3 

120

Where open meadows in the pine/mixed conifer type are to be maintained, 

eliminate invading overstory vegetation, stabilize gullies to raise the water 

table, scarify the soil, and seed with appropriate grass and forage species. 

Control livestock grazing through management and/or fencing to establish the 

revegetation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-1, FW-Graz-DC-3, 

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-TerrERU-AllG-1, FW-TerrERU-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-8

120

Identify each terrestrial ecosystem and assess soil properties to determine: 

 - Soil limitations for soil scarification purposes. 

 - The method of soil scarification best suited for the soils of the project area. 

 - Soil potential for revegetation - Identify soils that are suitable or unsuitable 

for successful revegetation. 

 - Erosion hazard and on-site soil loss - Soils with a potential erosion hazard 

rating of severe will require specific resource management activities in 

order to avoid severe impairment of soil productivity.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-G-2, FW-Soil-MgtAppA, FW-Soil-MgtApp-B 

122

Reforested areas are protected from animal damage until the plantations are 

established with satisfactory stocking, usually 5 to 10 years, FSM 2470 and 

FSH 2409.26b. Where needed to prevent livestock damage and ensure 

satisfactory stocking, plantations are fenced and assigned no grazing capacity 

until seedlings are established.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-3 

122-1 

Silvicultural prescriptions emphasize treating dwarf mistletoe infections to 

bring them down to acceptable levels, unless threatened, endangered, or 

sensitive species habitat requirements take precedence.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-TerrERUMC-All-DC-4, FW-TerrERU-MCAll-MgtApp-A, FW-TerrERU-PPDC-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-9, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-MgtApp-B 

123

Establish and maintain stand diversity through ISM to provide suitable habitat 

for wildlife in lands suitable for timber production, while maintaining or 

enhancing timber resource production and timber age class distribution 

(regulation).

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC2, FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-TerrERUMC-All-DC-1, FW-TerrERU-PPDC-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFPDC-2, FW-WFP-G-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

52

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

123

Within each 10K Block treated, uneven-aged management will be 

emphasized. Where even-aged management is used not less than 8 percent 

nor more than 40 percent of the suitable lands is scheduled for regeneration 

during any 20-year period, provided there are adequate stands available for 

regeneration. Stands can be regenerated if they have, generally, reached 

CMAI, have unacceptable dwarf mistletoe ratings, or have multiple-use 

objectives that require the stand to be regenerated before CMAI. Regenerated 

stands may be harvested at 95 percent of CMAI.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC2, FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-TerrERUMC-MCFF-DC-1, FW-TerrERUMC-MCFF-DC-2, FW-TerrERUMC-MCFF-DC-3, FW-TerrERUMC-MCFF-DC-4, FW-TerrERUPP-DC-1, FW-TerrERU-PP-DC2, FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-5, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

53

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

123

Maintain a current inventory of nest locations. A nest group consists of nest 

tree and adjacent trees and is maintained at least as follows unless 

environmental analysis indicates either more or less is needed: 

 - Goshawk -- Please refer to the Standards and Guidelines in the Forest-wide 

management direction on page 65-7 through 65-11. 

 - Cooper's hawk -- 15 acres of uncut area around active nests. 

 - Sharp-shinned hawk -- 10 acres of uncut area around active nests. 

 - Other raptors -- An area extending to 50 feet from active nests is left uncut. 

 - Bald eagle winter roosts -- Protect with a 300-foot radius uncut zone around 

the roost. Road development should avoid the roost and uncut zone. 

 - Ospreys -- At the start of Forest Plan implementation, the only known 

osprey nesting area is at Lake Mary. The following Standards and 

Guidelines apply to this nesting area. As additional nesting territories are 

discovered, environmental analysis is done to determine if, and to what 

extent, these Standards and Guidelines apply: 

 - Restrict all logging activities within one-fourth of a mile of active nests from 

March 1 through August 15. 

 - Provide a 20-acre nest site of uncut area around each existing (occupied or 

unoccupied) nest. 

 - Provide at least 3 potential nest sites in preferred nesting habitat within 

Designated Bald Eagle/Osprey Emphasis Area(s). This potential nest 

site should be at least 5 acres of mature and overmature trees with at 

least 2 snags per acre greater than or equal to 20 inches. Use of 

uneven-age stands is optimal. 

 - Construct artificial nesting platforms as needed for habitat maintenance and 

improvement. 

 - Forest-wide, during 10K Block planning, give high priority to managing for 

snags within potential osprey habitat. Snags and oldgrowth managed for 

osprey habitat contribute to the 10K Block requirements. 

 - Manage for at least 2 snags per acre of 20" or greater. Snags should be the 

height of the canopy or taller, on at least percent of the acres along the 

shorelines. Where necessary to provide sufficient perches and nest 

sites, take actions to create snags. 

 - Road construction or reconstruction should avoid osprey nest sites. New 

roads should not be constructed within 660 feet of nests. 

 - Where human disturbance is causing reproductive failure, evaluate the need 

to close the area from March 1 to at least August 15. 

 - In cooperation with the Arizona Game and Fish Department, develop and 

implement an osprey and wintering bald eagle public education program.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-RdsFac-DC1, FW-RdsFac-G-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-3, FWTerrERU-PP-G-4, FW-TerrERUPP-G-5, FW-WFP-DC-1, FWWFP-DC-11, FW-WFP-DC-7, 

FW-WFP-DC-8 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

54

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

124

Manage for at least 30 percent cover in 10K Blocks. Of this total at least one 

third is in thermal cover, one third is in hiding cover, and the remaining one 

third is in either thermal or hiding cover. Thermal cover for elk is a stand of 

coniferous trees tall enough to allow animal movement and bedding with a 

high degree of crown closure. Hiding cover is vegetation capable of hiding 90 

percent of a standing deer or elk from human view at a distance of 200 feet or 

less. Emphasize maintaining some thermal cover in known travelways and 

bedding areas. Emphasize maintaining some hiding cover adjacent to 

dependable water and key openings, along known travelways, and in pine 

stringers. Cover areas should be at least 200 feet wide; however, pine 

stringers less than this width may still be managed for hiding and thermal 

cover.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-1, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PP-MgtApp-A, FWWFP-DC-5, FW-WFP-DC-6 

124-1 

Evaluate existing and potential cover on a stand by stand basis. Consider 

open road densities, topography, and non-commercial tree, shrub, and 

herbaceous species to determine effective cover. The presence of noncommercial species, such as Gambel oak, New Mexico locust, juniper, aspen, 

and bigtooth maple, or topographic features such as drainages or other terrain 

breaks, rock outcrops, or large surface boulders, will normally result in less 

BA/GSL of commercial species to meet cover requirements. The measure of 

effective cover is meeting the definition and objectives for hiding cover or 

thermal cover.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-1, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-11, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-6, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-10, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-8, FWTerrERU-PP-MgtApp-A, FWWFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-5 

124-1 

Protect and manage to include hiding and thermal cover known fawning and 

calving areas and defer logging activities from May 15 to June 30 in these 

areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-G-8, FW-WFPMgtApp-F

125

The following table lists basal area (BA) and growing stock level (GSL) which 

experience has shown will fully meet hiding and thermal cover requirements in 

even age ponderosa pine and mixed conifer when there are no cover effects 

from topographic features or other species. The presence of more than one 

size class may reduce the amount of BA/GSL required to provide effective 

cover. Before determining that cover must be obtained by managing stands in 

suitable lands for these BA/GSL's, conduct field examinations to evaluate 

cover distribution needs and to determine whether other factors contributing to 

effective cover are present. (see Plan for table)

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-PP-MgtApp-A, FWWFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-DC-5, FWWFP-DC-6, FW-WFP-G-1, FWWFP-G-2 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

55

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

125

Manage for at least 20 percent of potential habitat capability for red squirrels 

in 10K Blocks as determined by the Forest Habitat Capability Model. As 

needed to meet habitat capability, protect red squirrel primary caches at a 

density of one cache per 2 acres. Retain all trees within a 26-foot radius from 

the cache (1/20th acre) (mixed conifer only).

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-G-3 

125 Manage for at least 20 percent of potential habitat capability for Abert squirrels 

in 10K Blocks as determined by the Forest Habitat Capability Model.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-G-3

126

In key mixed conifer bear habitat, manage for at least 30 percent of the mixed 

conifer to meet hiding cover needs. Give priority for cover management in 

drainage bottoms, heads of drainages, and isolated pockets of mixed conifer. 

Defer logging activities from April 15 to June 30 in known bear maternity 

areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-PP-MgtApp-A, FWWFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-3, FWWFP-G-3 

126 Defer timber harvesting and slash treatment activities in turkey nesting areas 

from April 15 through June 30.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-3, FW-WFP-G-3

126

Leave scattered patches of untreated slash within 1/2 mile of dependable 

water in actual or potential turkey nesting areas. Patches are at least 1/4 acre 

in size and cover at least 10 percent and not more than 20 percent of the 

harvested area. Slash is left untreated for at least 5 years, longer if it is 

determined that nesting is still occurring in the area. These guidelines will be 

evaluated and adjustments made, if necessary.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-PP-G-7, FW-TerrERUPP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-G-10, 

FW-WFP-G-3 

126 Retain and/or develop an average of at least two turkey roost tree groups per 

section, in actual or potential turkey habitats.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-PP-G-7, FW-TerrERUPP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-7, FW-WFP-DC-8, 

FW-WFP-G-3 

126 Retain and/or develop an average of at least four turkey roost tree groups per 

section in identified key turkey winter range.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-PP-G-7, FW-TerrERUPP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-7, FW-WFP-DC-8, 

FW-WFP-G-3
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

56

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

126

Snag Definition –

 - A ponderosa pine/mixed conifer snag is defined as a tree greater than 12 

inches d.b.h. and 15 feet tall. 

 - An aspen snag is defined as a tree greater than 12 inches d.b.h. and 15 feet 

tall. 

 - An oak snag is defined as a tree greater than 10 inches d.b.h. and 10 feet 

tall.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-5 

126

Within 10K Blocks at least 50 percent of the forested land meets the following 

criteria for snags: 

 - At a minimum, snags are maintained at an average of 200 snags per 100 

acres. 

 - Snag species will represent the tree species composition of the stand. 

 - In high priority areas as determined by environmental analysis, including 

both edge habitats adjacent to meadows or water and interior stands, 

manage for an average of 280 snags per 100 acres. 

 - Snags are not available for firewood unless designated because of being 

surplus to wildlife needs, for example, after wildfires.

 - Snag acres in old-growth can be used to count toward the snag requirement 

within a 10K Block. 

 - Snags and potential snags will be identified and tallied for each stand. 

Markers will paint mark each tree with a yellow "w". 

 - Leave potential snags where needed to meet snag requirements. The 

following are priorities for leaving trees for future snags: 

 - obvious culls with conks and cavities present, 

 - less than one-third merchantable tree including wolfy and crooked 

trees, 

 - spiketops less than one-half merchantable, 

 - any tree expected to die before expected harvest of the sale being 

marked, and 

 - mistletoe and genetically poor trees will not be left unless they are 

planned to be killed. 

 - Carefully plan salvage sales to meet snag standards where snag numbers 

are less than desired levels. Delay salvage sales if numbers are too low 

to allow salvage. 

 - Nonharvest areas, such as wilderness or unsuitable timber lands, can be 

credited toward meeting management direction for snag management. 

Use of nonharvest areas from adjacent 10K Blocks does not exceed onethird of the 10K Block management objectives for snags.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-5, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

57

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

129 Stands managed for old-growth are 100 to 300 acres in size.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9

131

Manage oak to improve wildlife habitat and provide firewood. Silvicultural 

prescriptions provide a balance of age classes within a 10K Block and provide 

a sustained-yield of sprouts, mast, cavities, and foliage volume. Maintain oak 

components wherever they occur. Salvaging of dead, down oak is 

encouraged. Oak showing obvious wildlife use will be retained.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-TerrERUMC-All-DC-3, FW-TerrERU-MCMCFF-DC-1, FW-TerrERU-PPDC-7, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-5, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-MgtApp-A, FWWFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-7, FWWFP-G-3

133

Pine stringers are noncontiguous, narrow communities of predominantly 

ponderosa pine that extend into the pinyon-juniper woodland below the normal 

elevational distribution of ponderosa pine. Manage pine stringers to 

emphasize wildlife habitat needs by maintaining turkey roosts and big game 

cover except where environmental analysis indicates otherwise.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-4, FWTerrERU-All-G-4, FW-TerrERUPP-MgtApp-A 

133

Mixed conifer stringers, primarily Douglas-fir, are noncontiguous, narrow 

communities that extend into the ponderosa pine. Manage the mixed conifer 

stringers to emphasize wildlife habitat needs by maintaining big game cover 

except where environmental analysis indicates otherwise.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-4, FWTerrERU-All-G-4 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

58

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

133

Timber stands managed to meet visual management objective (VQO) of 

foreground retention are managed as follows: 

 - Maintain or create a mosaic of stands of various sizes and age classes 

throughout the rotation. 

 - Obtain a stand of ponderosa pine and/or mixed conifer at maturity of 30 to 

45 trees per acre. 

 - The average diameter of mature trees is 20 inches or greater. The large 

trees are maintained as long as possible. Extended rotations may be 

necessary. 

 - Allow naturally regenerated trees to stay if the overall visual quality objective 

is met. 

 - Obtain diversity of landscape management features. 

 - Created slash is promptly treated. 

 - Mistletoe treatments are designed to meet as many of these Standards as 

possible. 

 - Precommercial thinning is done as needed to meet the visual quality 

objectives.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-Scenic-G-1, 

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-PP-G-7 

133

Uneven-Aged Management – 

 - Uneven-aged stands have three or more distinct age classes present. The 

different aged trees are usually intermixed. Cutting methods are used that 

develop and maintain uneven-aged stands such as single-tree selection 

and group selection. Stands are entered on a 20-year cutting cycle and 

cut to a GSL of 100. Stand size is determined by the scale of the 

landscape, width of the road, and the speed of the viewer (e.g., I-17 vs. 

89A). Stand size may be less than 10 acres.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC2, FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-TerrERUMC-All-DC-1, FW-TerrERU-MCMCFF-DC-7, FW-TerrERU-MCMCIF-DC-1, FW-TerrERU-PPDC-4, FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-6, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-2, FW-TerrERUPP-G-3

134

Roads to be managed for foreground Retention within this MA and in MA 4 

(other areas of foreground retention on the timber type are found in MA's 13 

and 19): (see Plan for table) An average 300 feet on each side of the road will 

be managed as foreground Retention (nearly 20,000 acres) total from all 

MA's. Determine the exact width of the foreground Retention area after onthe-ground review.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-ScenicDC-1, FW-Scenic-DC-2, FWScenic-G-1 

134 Created slash will be treated.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-Scenic-DC2, FW-Scenic-G-1, FW-ScenicG-3
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

59

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

134

Except for the following GSL's, the standard silvicultural prescription for 

foreground Partial Retention areas is the same as the standard silvicultural 

prescriptions for Ponderosa Pine/Mixed Conifer (see page 130). Stand sizes 

may be less than 10 acres; Growing stock levels (GSL) are maintained 

approximately as follows: Ponderosa pine - Site 75 - 90 GSL Site 56-74 - 80 

GSL Sites less than 56 - 70 GSL Mixed conifer - Sites > 65 - 90 GSL Sites < 

65 - 70 GSL.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-Scenic-G1 

135

Underneath transmission lines there may be a potential for Christmas tree 

production, firewood, wildings, pulpwood, and/or other miscellaneous forest 

products. The land is managed to attain products whenever possible. The 

choice of silvicultural objectives depends on the profile of the powerline and 

the multiple-use objectives.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-FprodMgtApp-A, FW-Fprod-MgtApp-B 

136 Construct landings and decking areas outside of riparian areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-Rip-All-G-1, FW-Rip-All-G-3, 

FW-Rip-All-MgtApp-A, FW-RipStrm-G-2, FW-Rip-Strm-MgtAppA

136 Locate or relocate roads out of riparian areas, except at designated crossings. 

Obliterate unnecessary roads in riparian areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacG-1, FW-RdsFac-G-6, FWRdsFac-G-7, FW-Rec-All-G-1, 

FW-Rip-All-G-3, FW-Rip-AllMgtApp-A, FW-Rip-Strm-G-1, 

FW-Rip-Strm-G-2, FW-Rip-StrmMgtApp-A

136

Avoid or designate stream course crossings for skid trails. Limit to the 

minimum needed. Choose crossings with stable conditions or stable bed and 

bank material such as cobble or rock.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, FW-RipStrm-G-1, FW-Rip-Strm-MgtAppA 

136

Restrict skidding and hauling to soil moisture conditions that do not cause 

excessive soil compaction, displacement, or puddling. Restrict timber sale 

activities to slopes of 25 percent or less on cinder cones under conventional 

skidding.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-Soil-DC-2, FW-Soil-G-2 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

60

Management Area 3 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

136

For each timber sale area, identify each terrestrial ecosystem and assess soil 

properties to determine: 

 - Soils with severe potential for sheet and gully erosion, such as steep slopes, 

cinder cones, alluvial bottoms, and swales, that require specific resource 

management activities in order to avoid severe impairment of soil 

productivity. 

 - Soil limitations for site preparation - Identify soils that present severe 

limitations for successful site preparation such as soils with severe 

erosion hazard and shallow soils. Require specific resource management 

activities where successful site preparation is limited by environmental 

factors in the terrestrial ecosystem. 

 - Soil potential for reforestation - Identify soils that are suitable or unsuitable 

for successful reforestation. Adjust stocking levels and require specific 

resource management activities where successful reforestation is limited 

by environmental factors in the terrestrial ecosystem. 

 - Whether soils are suitable, unsuitable, or unproductive for timber 

management. 

 - Soil limitations for timber harvest activities. 

 - Soils with high potential to convert to another vegetative type such as oak, 

locust, or juniper as a result of timber management activities - Modify 

timber management activities in these terrestrial ecosystems to halt the 

type conversion by approved chemical or mechanical means or by 

prescribed fire.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Scenic-MgtApp-A, FW-SoilG-2, FW-Soil-MgtApp-B 

137 Suppression objective is 100 acres or less.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FW-WUIDC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, FW-WUIDC-4

137 Prescribed fire using planned and unplanned ignitions is used to meet 

resource objectives.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A 

137 Unplanned ignitions are not used as a management tool in the urban 

interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FWWUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

61

Management Area 4 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Greater Than 40 Percent Slopes 

Management Area 4 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, 

Greater Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

139 Emphasize wildlife habitat, watershed condition, and dispersed recreation. 

Management intensity is low.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-WaterDC-1, FW-Water-DC-2, FWWater-DC-4, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

MA-PineBelt-DC-1, MA-PineBeltDC-2, MA-PineBelt-DC-5, MAPineBelt-DC-6, MA-PineBelt-DC7, MA-PineBelt-DC-8, MAPineBelt-S-1, MA-PineBelt-S-2, 

MA-PineBelt-S-3, MA-PineBeltS-4

139

Manage for the following indicator species:

 ̈ Turkey

 ̈ Goshawk

 ̈ Pygmy nuthatch

 ̈ Elk

 ̈ Abert squirrel

 ̈ Red squirrel

 ̈ Hairy woodpecker

 ̈ Spotted owl

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

139 Manage the Dry Lake Hills-Mount Elden area for dispersed recreation and 

wildlife habitat and a semi-primitive nonmotorized ROS class.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-WFP-DC1, MA-MtElden-DC-1, MAMtElden-G-2

139

Manage at least 640 acres of the tentatively suitable timber lands for oldgrowth on a sustained basis to achieve at least 320 acres meeting old-growth 

conditions at all times.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-13, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

62

Management Area 4 - Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, 

Greater Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

140

Manage the Mount Elden/Dry Lake Hills to maintain a semi-primitive

nonmotorized ROS class. Build a loop trail system tying into trailheads at

Schultz Pass, Schultz Creek, Flagstaff-Elden Ranger Station, and Buffalo 

Park. Trails are for non-motorized use unless designated through a National

Environmental Policy Act planning process. Horses and packstock are allowed

except on the Mount Elden Lookout Trail and the portion of the Oldham Trail

between Buffalo Park and the El Paso natural gas pipeline. The trail system is

maintained at standard service level.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-RecTrails-O-1, MA-MtElden-DC-2, 

MA-MtElden-G-2, MA-MtEldenS-1 

Management Area 5 - Aspen 

Management Area 5 - Aspen

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

141

Manage for the following indicator species:

 ̈ Yellow bellied sapsucker 

 ̈ Mule deer

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

141 Manage firewood on a sustained-yield basis.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-FProd-G-3 

142

Clearcutting to enhance or maintain aspen in Retention and Partial Retention 

areas is permissible with limitations on size and distribution of openings. 

Clearcuts should be distributed over larger areas rather than confined to small 

areas. In Retention areas, openings may be up to 2.5 acres in foreground 

areas, 5 acres in middleground areas, and 20 acres in background areas. In 

Partial Retention areas, openings may be up to 15 acres in foreground areas, 

and 40 acres in middleground and background areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-Fprod-G-2, FW-Scenic-G-1, 

FW-TerrERU-All-S-3 

142 Fence to protect aspen regeneration from grazing or wildlife where necessary.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-AspMpl-G-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

63

Management Area 5 - Aspen

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

143 Manage aspen regeneration stands to limit aspen sprout consumption by 

grazing to 20 percent or less of current year's growth.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-TerrERUAspMpl-G-1, FW-TerrERUAspMpl-MgtApp-A 

143

Where water facilities are provided inside aspen stands, pipe water to areas 

outside the stand to maintain distribution of livestock and wildlife. This is to be 

done during reconstruction of the structural facility where feasible.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-Graz-G-4, 

FW-TerrERU-AspMpl-DC-1, FWTerrERU-AspMpl-DC-3 

143 Regeneration is planned to occur naturally by sprouting. Artificial regeneration 

may be needed when clonal root systems have died or have been destroyed.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-AspMpl-DC-1, FWTerrERU-AspMpl-DC-2, FWTerrERU-AspMpl-DC-3, FWTerrERU-AspMpl-G-1, FWTerrERU-AspMpl-O-1 

143

Protect regenerated areas and assign no grazing capacity until seedlings are 

established. Protect areas or a group of areas by excluding grazing through 

fencing, or other means where appropriate. If funding is not available for 

needed protection, do not harvest the area(s).

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-TerrERUAspMpl-DC-1, FW-TerrERUAspMpl-G-1, FW-TerrERUAspMpl-MgtApp-A 

143

Establish and maintain stand diversity through ISM to provide suitable habitat 

for wildlife, while maintaining or enhancing firewood production, age class 

distribution, and sustained-yield of firewood.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC2, FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-WFP-DC1, FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-3 

143

Stands are managed by either even-aged or uneven-aged systems depending 

on the objectives and existing condition of the stand. Rotation length is a

minimum of 90 years. Minimum average stand diameter at regeneration is 11 

inches. Minimum stand size for management is 5 acres except in foreground 

Retention (see A2 above). Combining adjacent stands to create a larger more 

manageable stand is acceptable.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-TerrERU-AspMpl-DC-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

64

Management Area 5 - Aspen

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

143

Following firewood harvest treatments, other silvicultural treatments may be 

used to obtain natural regeneration including prescribed burning, girdling, 

disking, severing roots, and herbicide treatments when legally available, 

environmentally sound and most cost-efficient. Natural sexual reproduction 

also is possible, although not common.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-TerrERU-AspMpl-O-1 

143 Retain snags greater than 12 inches d.b.h. and nest trees. Follow snag 

Standards and Guidelines as shown in MA 3.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-AspMpl-DC-3 

144 Unplanned ignitions are not used as a management tool in the urban 

interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, 

FW-WUI-DC-4

Management Area 6 – Unproductive Timber Land

Management Area 6 – Unproductive Timber Land

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

145

Emphasize a combination of wildlife habitat, watershed condition, and 

livestock grazing. Other resources are managed in harmony with the 

emphasized resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-1, FW-Water-DC1, FW-WFP-DC-1 

145

Manage for the following indicator species: 

 ̈ Elk 

 ̈ Abert Squirrel 

 ̈ Mule Deer 

 ̈ Hairy Woodpecker

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

145 Use prescribed fire as a tool to help meet desired resource objectives.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-Fire-MgtApp-B 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

65

Management Area 6 – Unproductive Timber Land

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

146

Where an open meadow is maintained, as determined in an environmental 

analysis, eliminate invading overstory vegetation, stabilize gullies to raise the 

water table, and seed with appropriate grass and forage species. Control 

livestock grazing through management and/or fencing to allow for adequate 

revegetation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-1, FW-Graz-DC-3, 

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-TerrERU-AllG-1, FW-TerrERU-All-G-3 

146

Identify each terrestrial ecosystem and assess soil properties to determine: 

 - Soil limitations for soil scarification purposes. 

 - The method of soil scarification best suited for the soils of the project area. 

 - Soil potential for revegetation - Identify soils that are suitable or unsuitable 

for successful revegetation, 

 - Erosion hazard, and on-site soil loss - Soils with a potential erosion hazard 

rating of severe will require specific resource management activities in 

order to avoid severe impairment of soil productivity.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-DC-2, 

FW-Soil-DC-3, FW-Soil-G-2, 

FW-Soil-MgtApp-A, FW-SoilMgtApp-B 

147

Manage alligator juniper to maintain and enhance wildlife habitat by the 

following criteria: 

 - In areas where alligator juniper trees comprise less than 50 percent of the 

total basal area, retain live alligator juniper trees > 12 inches d.b.h. 

 - In areas where alligator juniper trees comprise more than 50 percent of the 

total basal area, live trees > 12 inches d.b.h. may be removed if < 25 

percent of the crown is living.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-7, FW-WFP-G-3 

147 Manage to retain and/or develop an average of at least four turkey roost tree 

groups per section in identified turkey winter range.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-PP-G-7, FW-TerrERUPP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-7, FW-WFP-DC-8, 

FW-WFP-G-3

147

Areas mapped as the urban interface have a suppression objective of 10 

acres or less. In areas outside of the urban interface, the suppression 

objective is to hold fires to 100 acres or less. Prescribed fire using planned 

and unplanned ignitions is used to accomplish resource objectives except no 

provision for unplanned ignitions in areas included in urban interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FWWUI-DC-4 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

66

Management Area 7 – Pinon-Juniper Woodland, Less Than 40 Percent Slopes 

Management Area 7 – Pinon-Juniper Woodland, Less Than 

40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

148

Emphasize firewood production, watershed condition, wildlife habitat, and 

livestock grazing. Other resources are managed in harmony with the 

emphasized resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-1, 

FW-Graz-DC-1, FW-Water-DC1, FW-WFP-DC-1

148 Manage the pinyon-juniper on a sustained-yield basis for firewood and 

miscellaneous convertible products, on 0-15 percent slopes.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-FProd-G-3 

148

Manage for the following indicator species: 

 ̈ Plain titmouse 

 ̈ Mule deer

 ̈ Elk

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

149 Provide water where needed on key wildlife winter ranges. Use bubblers or 

other means to prevent freezing, where needed.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-ConstWat-DC-1, FW-WFPDC-8, FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FWWFP-MgtApp-D 

150

Where seral grasslands are maintained in the pinyon-juniper woodland, 

eliminate invading vegetation through mechanical, chemical, or planned fire 

treatments on a maintenance schedule averaging once every 25 years. 

Consider firewood harvesting and Christmas tree harvesting as tree removal 

methods. Stabilize gullies, scarify the soil, and seed disturbed soils with a mix 

tailored for the site, emphasizing high production, shade tolerant, and multigrowing season species. Seed suitable areas in all range condition classes if 

needed. Control livestock grazing through management and/or fencing to 

allow for adequate revegetation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-TerrERU-AllDC-2, FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-All-G-3 

151

Terrestrial ecosystems are identified and soil properties are assessed to 

determine: 

 - Soil limitations for soil scarification purposes. 

 - The method of soil scarification best suited for the soils of the project area. 

 - Soil potential for revegetation - Identify soils that are suitable or unsuitable 

for successful revegetation. 

 - Erosion hazard and on-site soil loss - Soils with a potential erosion hazard 

rating of severe will require specific resource management activities in 

order to avoid severe impairment of soil productivity.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-Soil-DC-1, 

FW-Soil-DC-2, FW-Soil-DC-3, 

FW-Soil-MgtApp-A, FW-SoilMgtApp-B 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

67

Management Area 7 – Pinon-Juniper Woodland, Less Than 

40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

151

On pinyon-juniper lands managed for firewood production where firewood 

harvesting has taken place, lopping and scattering of slash may be used to 

create a more moist microclimate. Seed harvested areas with selected forage 

and browse species. Allow slash to become dry and brittle. Slash may be 

crushed where it adversely affects livestock and/or wildlife movement. Areas 

may be reseeded prior to crushing. This series of events takes place over a 1-

2 year time span. Approximately 1,490 acres are cut for firewood per year. 

Grazing takes place following cutting to use the transitional range. A second 

entry to these sites is made approximately 15 years later to remove excess 

stocking of woodland regeneration and selected seed trees. No range 

nonstructural improvement practices will be implemented until the next 

firewood harvest.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-3, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWTerrERU-All-G-3, FW-TerrERUPJ-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PJ-G-4, 

FW-WFP-DC-3, FW-WFP-G-3 

151

Establish and maintain stand diversity through ISM to provide suitable habitat 

for wildlife while maintaining or enhancing firewood production and age class 

distribution (regulation).

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-1, 

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-5, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-5, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-6, FW-WFPDC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFPG-3

152

Manage stands to achieve –

 - At least 3,000 trees/100 acres of 9 inches d.r.c. or greater. 

 - At least 100 snags/100 acres > 9 inches d.r.c. and 10 feet or greater in 

height. 

 - At least two logs/acre of down woody material 9 inches in diameter or 

greater and 10 feet long. 

 - At least 5 percent of the forested lands able to produce old-growth in each 

10K Block meets old-growth conditions at all times.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-PJ-DC-10, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-11, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-12, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-5, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-7, FWTerrERU-PJ-G-5 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

68

Management Area 7 – Pinon-Juniper Woodland, Less Than 

40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

152

Develop projects using the following criteria, that ensure perpetuation of the 

woodland vegetation type and to maintain wildlife habitat: 

 - Created openings in areas that have been identified as historic big game 

winter range are designed so that an animal will be no more than 10 

chains (660 feet) from hiding cover at any location within the opening. 

 - Harvested areas are separated from adjacent areas by at least an 8 chain 

wide untreated strip. 

 - Cover corridors are laid out to connect treated areas or breaks in terrain to 

provide interconnecting cover corridors. Known or suspected routes of 

game travel are used to lay out cover corridors. Corridors are managed to 

create at least 60 percent crown cover, and are at least 8 chains wide. 

 - Use steep, rocky, or otherwise unmanaged areas useable by game to 

satisfy wildlife cover requirements to the extent possible (MA 8). Cover 

requirements are considered on a 10K Block basis. 

 - At least 20 percent of the area within a 20 chain zone adjacent to pine 

stringers is managed for dense mature or overmature stands of 

pinyon/juniper. Gambel oak in these zones is managed to increase mast 

production. If operable ground extends to the edge of a sharp break in 

terrain, such as a deep, steep canyon or bluff, leave an untreated strip 

along the break, a minimum of 3 to 8 chains wide on at least 20 percent 

of the break, varied to fit the country, character, and density of the stand. 

The same treatment is given to toes of slope breaks in terrain. 

 - Lay out projects to appear as natural configurations of the woodland. 

 - There are usually 30 years difference between regeneration of any two 

adjoining stands. Manage to achieve where possible not more than one

quarter of a stand's perimeter in common with an adjacent stand whose 

ages vary by less than 30 years. 

 - Harvesting firewood for sustained production is done only on sites meeting 

minimum regeneration criteria or as a method to prepare sites for 

subsequent regeneration. 

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-2, 

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-Fprod-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-3, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-1, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-10, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-14, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-9, FW-WFPDC-2, FW-WFP-DC-6, FW-WFPG-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

69

Management Area 7 – Pinon-Juniper Woodland, Less Than 

40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

153

Develop projects using the following criteria, that ensure perpetuation of the 

woodland vegetation type and to maintain wildlife habitat (continued): 

 - Unwanted, merchantable trees are disposed of through firewood sales on 

projects where tree removal is necessary. Large projects may need 3 

years for disposal of trees by this method. 

 - Where slash suitable for firewood is piled for burning, there is at least 2 

years free-use firewood salvage before burning piles. 

 - There is no firewood cutting in sensitive big game winter range from 

November 30 to April 15. 

 - Manage for at least an average of 1.0 snag per acre on 40 percent of the 

pinyon-juniper woodland acres in each 10K Block. Snags are at least 9-

inch d.r.c. and at least 10 feet high. - Microenvironment of some sites 

may warrant lopping or scattering created slash to improve regeneration 

success and forage production. 

 - Cover is managed to provide at least 60 percent crown cover and at least 8 

chains wide. Manage for hiding and thermal cover in known fawning and 

calving areas. 

 - Manage for small game and nongame by leaving an average of one slash 

pile per 3 acres in the woodland type and/or leave lopped and scattered 

slash on 30 percent of area harvested. 

 - An average of three unburned piles per acre are left on areas with piled 

slash to provide cover for birds and small animals or leave lopped and 

scattered slash on 30 percent of treatment area. 

 - Manage for at least 30 percent cover. 

 - Emphasize cover management in travelways, bedding areas, reproductive 

areas, and adjacent to dependable waters and key openings. 

 - Cover is managed to provide at least 60 percent crown cover and at least 8 

chains wide. Manage for hiding and thermal cover in known fawning and 

calving areas. 

 - Manage for small game and nongame by leaving an average of one slash 

pile per 3 acres in the woodland type and/or leave lopped and scattered 

slash on 30 percent of area harvested. 

 - Manage for at least an average of 1.0 snag per acre on 40 percent of the 

pinyon-juniper woodland acres in each 10K Block. Snags are at least 9-

inch d.r.c. and at least 10 feet high.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-2, 

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-Fprod-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-3, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-1, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-10, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-14, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-9, FW-WFPDC-2, FW-WFP-DC-6, FW-WFPG-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

70

Management Area 7 – Pinon-Juniper Woodland, Less Than 

40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

153 

Develop projects using the following criteria, that ensure perpetuation of the 

woodland vegetation type and to maintain wildlife habitat: Shelterwood – 

 - Natural regeneration is planned during the regeneration period. No planting 

is done. Site preparation in conjunction with good seed crops (3-7 years 

for pinyon) may be done. 

 - Intermediate cuts are designed to increase forage and wood fiber 

production. 

 - Preparatory cuts are done as needed to prepare the stand for regeneration. 

 - Seed cut is designed to leave a minimum of 20 to 50 trees/acre, depending 

on the amount of advanced regeneration present and the tree species 

mix desired. The number of residual trees is increased by 20 percent in 

areas to be managed for Christmas tree production. 

 - Final removal is done when seedlings are established and certified. Average 

rotation length is 180 years. 

 - Slash is lopped and scattered during regeneration.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-All-S-2, FW-TerrERUPJ-G-2, FW-WFP-G-3 

153

Develop projects using the following criteria, that ensure perpetuation of the 

woodland vegetation type and to maintain wildlife habitat: Clear Cuts – 

 - Clearcuts may also be used, particularly when regeneration of alligator 

juniper is desired. Average rotation length is 180 years. 

 - Firewood harvests cut small patches of trees not to exceed 40 acres in size. 

The Regional Forester may approve cut areas greater than 40 acre.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-S-2, FWTerrERU-All-S-3, FW-WFP-G-3 

153

Develop projects using the following criteria, that ensure perpetuation of the 

woodland vegetation type and to maintain wildlife habitat: Unevenage – 

 - Uneven-aged systems may also be used. Regeneration may be more 

certain with the single tree selection method.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-2, 

FW-WFP-G-3 

154

Pine stringers are noncontiguous, narrow communities of predominantly 

ponderosa pine that extend into the pinyon-juniper woodland below the normal 

elevational distribution of ponderosa pine. Manage pine stringers to 

emphasize wildlife habitat needs by maintaining turkey roosts and big game 

cover.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-All-G-4 

155 Restrict firewood harvest and hauling to soil moisture conditions that do not 

cause excessive soil compaction, displacement, or puddling.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-DC-2, 

FW-Soil-G-2
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

71

Management Area 7 – Pinon-Juniper Woodland, Less Than 

40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

155

For each project area, identify each terrestrial ecosystem and assess soil 

properties to determine: 

 - Soil potential for reforestation - Identify soils that are suitable or unsuitable 

for successful reforestation. 

 - Soils that contain undesirable soil properties that determine regeneration or 

revegetation in an area as being difficult.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-MgtApp-A, FW-SoilMgtApp-B 

155

Suppression objective is to minimize cost and provide for personnel safety. 

Areas mapped as urban interface have a suppression objective of 10 acres or 

less. In areas outside the urban interface, the suppression objective is to hold 

fires to 1,000 acres or less.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-1, 

FW-WUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, 

FW-WUI-DC-4

155

Prescribed fire using planned and unplanned ignitions is used to accomplish 

resource objectives except no provision for unplanned ignitions in areas 

included in urban interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-4

Management Area 8 – Pinyon-Juniper Woodland, Greater Than 40 Percent Slopes 

Management Area 8 – Pinyon-Juniper Woodland, Greater 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

156

Manage for the following indicator species: 

 ̈ Plain titmouse 

 ̈ Mule deer 

 ̈ Elk

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

156 During winter months in key wildlife winter ranges provide water where 

needed using bubblers to prevent freezing.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-ConstWat-DC-1, FW-WFPDC-8, FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FWWFP-MgtApp-D
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

72

Management Area 8 – Pinyon-Juniper Woodland, Greater 

Than 40 Percent Slopes

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

157

Old Growth

 - At least 3,000 trees/100 acres of 9 inches d.r.c. or greater. 

 - At least 100 snags/100 acres > 9 inches d.r.c. and 10 feet or greater in 

height. 

 - At least two logs/acre of down woody material 9 inches in diameter or 

greater and 10 feet long. 

 - Not less than 5 percent of the forested lands capable of producing oldgrowth in each 10K Block meets old-growth conditions at any time.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-TerrERUPJ-DC-10, FW-TerrERU-PJ-DC11, FW-TerrERU-PJ-DC-12, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-5, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-7, FWTerrERU-PJ-G-5 

157 Suppression objective 250 acres or less except where included in urban 

interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FWWUI-DC-1, FW-WUI-DC-2, FWWUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4 

157

Prescribed fire using planned and unplanned ignitions is used to accomplish 

resource objectives except no provision for unplanned ignitions in areas 

included in urban interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-TerrERU-AllG-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, FW-WUIDC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4

Management Area 9 – Mountain Grassland

Management Area 9 – Mountain Grassland

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

158

Manage for the following indicator species: 

 ̈ Antelope 

 ̈ Elk

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

159

When springs are developed in meadow communities, riparian areas, or other 

sensitive areas, protect these areas by piping the water to water 

developments in adjacent, less sensitive areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-Spr-G-4 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

73

Management Area 9 – Mountain Grassland

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

160

Maintain existing mountain meadows by removing invading overstory by 

cutting or other methods, gully stabilization to raise the water table, soil 

scarification, and seeding with appropriate grass and forage species.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-All-G-3, FW-Water-DC1, FW-WFP-G-3

160 Control livestock grazing by management and/or fencing to allow adequate 

regeneration of grasses and forbs.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-Graz-G-4 

160 Increase forage production by attaining a balanced composition of cool and 

warm season forage species.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-1, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWTerrERU-Grass-DC-4

160

Manage mountain grasslands to achieve 90 percent of potential ground cover 

to prevent accelerated surface erosion and gully formation. Areas that 

presently do not meet these standards are scarified and seeded to bring 

ground cover to the desired level by the second decade. Restricting livestock 

may be necessary until revegetation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-DC-3, FW-TerrERUGrass-DC-1 

160

Identify each terrestrial ecosystem and assess soil properties to determine: 

 - Soil limitations for soil scarification purposes. The method of soil 

scarification best suited for the soils of the project area. 

 - Soil potential for revegetation - Identify soils that are suitable or unsuitable 

for successful revegetation, erosion hazard, and on-site soil loss. Soils 

with a potential erosion hazard rating of severe will require specific 

resource management activities in order to avoid severe impairment of 

soil productivity.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-MgtApp-A, FW-SoilMgtApp-B 

160

Plan and implement cost effective stream channel restoration projects to raise 

the water table in meadow areas where channel erosion has resulted in a 

lowering of the water table.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-Grass-O-3, FWWater-DC-2, FW-Water-DC-6, 

FW-Water-G-4

160 Generally, avoid construction of new roads. Relocate and reconstruct around 

this roads around this MA whenever possible.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacG-5 

161

Suppression objective is to minimize suppression costs and provide for 

personnel safety. Suppression objective of 10 acres or less in areas mapped 

as urban interface. In areas outside the urban interface the suppression 

objective is to hold fires to 100 acres or less. Suppression methods are 

chosen to minimize damage to the resource.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, 

FW-WUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

74

Management Area 9 – Mountain Grassland

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

161

Prescribed fire using planned and unplanned ignitions is used to accomplish 

resource objectives except no provision for unplanned ignitions in areas 

included in urban interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FWWUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, FWWUI-DC-4

Management Area 10 – Grassland and Sparse Pinon-Juniper Above the Rim

Management Area 10 – Grassland and Sparse PinonJuniper Above the Rim

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

162 Manage for the following indicator species:

 ̈ Antelope

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

163 Roadside signing is a part of the visitor experience, and is of high quality. 

Signing, interpretive, informative, or regulatory is done in a positive manner.

Addressed in plan components

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-2, FW-RdsFac-G-3, 

FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-A, MAWalnut-MgtApp-A 

163 Speed limits are posted and maintained by the Park Service.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-3, FW-Rec-AllMgtApp-A, MA-Walnut-MgtAppA 

163 The fenced boundary is signed as "National Forest Land Administered by the 

Park Service."

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-A, MAWalnut-MgtApp-A 

163

The Forest and the Park Service cooperate together in fire suppression 

activities. A joint agreement is annually prepared to describe in detail the 

nature of the cooperation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-MgtApp-D 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

75

Management Area 10 – Grassland and Sparse PinonJuniper Above the Rim

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

163 Prescribed burning to reduce hazardous fuels is approved jointly by the Forest 

and the Park Service. Activities may be proposed by either agency.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppB, FW-Fire-MgtApp-D 

164 

Control invasion of undesirable plant species when necessary to improve and 

protect wildlife habitat values. Prescribed burning will be one specific practice 

used, especially where needed to improve wildlife habitat.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-MgtApp-B, FW-InvasDC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

164

Maintain a seral grassland state on pinyon-juniper lands where type 

conversions have occurred in the past, with the exception that corridors of 

cover for wildlife habitat, determined through environmental analysis, may be 

allowed to develop through regrowth of pinyon-juniper. Initiate a retreatment 

schedule of approximately 25 years. Retreatments are accomplished through 

one or all of the following methods (see Table 12): 

 - Individual tree pushing or cutting; 

 - Prescribed burning; 

 - Chemical treatments.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-TerrERU-AllDC-2, FW-TerrERU-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-Grass-DC-1, FWTerrERU-PJ-G-1 

165

Pinyon-juniper woodlands that have not been previously treated, but are in the 

0 to 10 percent canopy cover class as a result of past fire and subsequent 

successional development, are evaluated through the environmental analysis 

process to determine if they are included among lands maintained as seral 

grasslands. The criteria used for physical/biological suitability are the rating of 

soil potential for revegetation and the erosion potential as outlined in the 

Terrestrial Ecosystems Survey Handbook (TESH, January 7, 1985).

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-MgtApp-A, FW-SoilMgtApp-B, FW-TerrERU-GrassDC-1, FW-TerrERU-PJ-G-1, FWTerrERU-PJ-MgtApp-A 

165

Identify terrestrial ecosystems and assess soil properties to determine:

 - Soil limitations for soil scarification purposes. 

 - The method of soil scarification best suited for the soils of the project area. 

 - Soil potential for revegetation - Identify soils that are suitable or unsuitable 

for successful revegetation. 

 - Erosion hazard and on-site soil loss - Soils with a potential erosion hazard 

rating of severe will require specific resource management activities in 

order to avoid severe impairment of soil productivity.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Scenic-MgtApp-A, FW-SoilMgtApp-B 

165

Suppression objective is to minimize cost and provide for personnel safety. 

Suppression objective is 10 acres or less in areas mapped as the urban 

interface. In areas outside urban interface, the suppression objective is to hold 

fire to 1,000 acres or less.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, 

FW-WUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

76

Management Area 10 – Grassland and Sparse PinonJuniper Above the Rim

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

165

Prescribed fire using planned and unplanned ignitions is used to accomplish 

resource objectives except no provision for unplanned ignitions in areas 

included in urban interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FWWUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, FWWUI-DC-4

Management Area 11 – Verde Valley 

Management Area 11 – Verde Valley

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

166 Manage for the following indicator species: 

 ̈ Antelope

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

167

Verde Valley is managed for dispersed recreation along the upper Verde River 

outside the Wild and Scenic section and along lower Oak Creek. Coordinate 

management of areas adjacent to, and clearly visible from, the portion of the 

Verde River classified as Wild and Scenic with the Verde River 

Implementation Plan. Place special emphasis on maintaining ROS class 

compatible with management and use of the Wild and Scenic River.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllG-1, MA-VerdeV-DC-2, MAVerdeV-DC-3, MA-VerdeV-DC-4, 

MA-VerdeV-G-2, SA-WSR-DC-2, 

SA-WSR-DC-5, SA-WSR-DC-6, 

SA-WSR-G-1 

167

Coordinate with Dead Horse State Park for connecting trails and access roads 

adjacent to the Park. These trails/roads are consistent with more complete 

service to the public and other resource management support.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-1, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, 

FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-C, MAVerdeV-DC-3, MA-VerdeVMgtApp-D
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

77

Management Area 11 – Verde Valley

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

167

Manage the segment of West Clear Creek downstream from the wilderness to 

Clear Creek Campground and the segment of Wet Beaver Creek downstream 

from the wilderness to the private land boundary at the section line between 

sections 22 and 23, T. 15N., R. 6E. to maintain their free flowing status and 

their scenic and recreational values. Manage to avoid impacts that would 

disqualify them from future study and possible designation as scenic, 

recreational, or other equivalent classification. Evaluate activities and 

proposed developments that are visible from or that could affect the physical 

character or ROS class through the environmental analysis process. 

Proposed developments evaluated in this manner include, but are not limited 

to, impoundments and new water diversions (unless directed otherwise by 

legislation), developed recreation sites, and road building. Manage livestock 

grazing and vehicular access to maintain ROS class and recreation/scenic 

values.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-Rec-Disp-DC2, SA-WSR-DC-1, SA-WSR-G-1 

167

Access likely to cause disturbance is prohibited in the vicinity of nesting bald 

eagles between December 1 and June 15 (Closure Order 16-52, October 23, 

1984). If eagles occupy a nest territory earlier or later, the closure period may 

be lengthened or shortened.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-F, FW-WFPS-2, MA-VerdeV-S-1 

168

Determine the need to control invasion of undesirable plant species in 

antelope range to improve and protect wildlife habitat values. Where 

necessary, implement the control measures, such as prescribed burning to 

improve antelope habitat.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppB, FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-G1, FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC3, FW-WFP-G-3 

168

Stabilize gullies, scarify the soil, and seed disturbed soils species mix tailored 

for the site, emphasizing high production, shade tolerant, and multi-growing 

season species. Control livestock grazing through management and/or 

fencing to allow for adequate revegetation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-3, 

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-GrazMgtApp-A, FW-Graz-MgtApp-B, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-All-G-3
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

78

Management Area 11 – Verde Valley

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

169

Identify terrestrial ecosystems and assess soil properties to determine: 

 - Soil limitations for soil scarification purposes. 

 - The method of soil scarification best suited for the soils of the project area. 

 - Soil potential for revegetation - Identify soils that are suitable or unsuitable 

for successful revegetation. 

 - Erosion hazard and on-site soil loss - Soils with a potential erosion hazard 

rating of severe will require specific resource management activities in 

order to avoid severe impairment of soil productivity.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-MgtAppA, FW-Soil-MgtApp-B 

170

Suppression objective is to minimize cost and provide for personnel safety 

except suppression objective is 10 acres or less in areas mapped as the 

urban interface. In areas outside the urban interface, the suppression 

objective is to hold fires to 1,000 acres or less.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, 

FW-WUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4 

170

Prescribed fire using planned and unplanned ignitions is used to accomplish 

resource objectives except no provision for unplanned ignitions in areas 

included in urban interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-Fire-MgtApp-B, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, 

FW-WUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

79

Management Area 12 – Riparian and Open Water 

Management Area 12 – Riparian and Open Water

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

172

An interdisciplinary team approach will be used on management activities 

such as timber sales, allotment management plans, and other management 

activities to prescribe specific management practices to meet the goal of 

riparian area recovery by 2030. Manage riparian areas based on the potential 

to support riparian vegetation. Potential is determined through a consensus of 

an interdisciplinary review. In order to achieve certain aspects of recovery, 

such as establishing three age classes of woody riparian vegetation, 

implementing riparian Standards and Guidelines occurs in the first decade. 

Riparian areas provide a filter strip of vegetation, important for filtering 

sediments generated from upslope soil erosion. Eighty percent of the riparian 

recovery is expected by 2030. The remaining 20 percent will be significantly 

improved, but will not have all of the characteristics of a fully recovered 

riparian area. The goals and objectives for elk populations and for livestock 

grazing affect achievement of the full recovery.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-GrazMgtApp-A, FW-Rip-All-DC-1, 

FW-Rip-All-DC-5, FW-Rip-All-G1, FW-Rip-All-G-2, FW-Rip-AllG-3, FW-Rip-All-MgtApp-A, FWRip-Strm-G-2, FW-Rip-StrmMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-C 

172

Manage for the following indicator species: 

 ̈ Cinnamon teal 

 ̈ Lincoln's sparrow 

 ̈ Yellow breasted chat 

 ̈ Lucy's Warbler 

 ̈ Macroinvertebrates

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 

173 Do not issue outfitter/guide permits or permit use which causes significant 

change for the ROS social or managerial setting, e.g., airboats or seaplanes.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllG-2, FW-SpecUse-G-17

173

The following applies to riparian areas, whether they are large enough to be

mapped out or not. Wetlands and open water containing emergent vegetation 

which provide nesting habitat are protected from disturbing uses that will 

harass nesting birds, such as activities that are noisy or would damage nests 

or nesting habitat from May 1 to July 15.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFP-G-8, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-F, FW-WFPS-2 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

80

Management Area 12 – Riparian and Open Water

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

174

Meet the following Riparian Standards in the Regional Guide for 80 percent of 

riparian areas above the Rim and 90 percent below the Rim by the year 2030: 

 - Maintain at least 80 percent of the potential overstory crown coverage. 

 - Maintain at least three age classes of woody riparian species, with at least 

10 percent of the woody plant cover in sprouts, seedlings, and saplings. 

 - Maintain at least 80 percent of the potential stream shading from June to 

September along perennial cold and cool water streams. 

 - Maintain at least 80 percent of the potential shrub cover in high elevation 

areas. 

 - Maintain at least 80 percent of the potential emergent vegetation cover from 

May 1 to July 15 in key wetlands. 

 - Maintain at least 80 percent of the spawning gravel surface free of inorganic 

sediment. 

 - Maintain at least 80 percent of streambank total linear distance in stable 

condition. 

- Retain snags in riparian areas that are not a safety hazard.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-RipRipType-DC-1, FW-RipRipType-DC-2, FW-RipRipType-DC-3, FW-RipRipType-O-1, FW-Rip-Spr-DC-1, 

FW-Rip-Spr-DC-2, FW-Rip-StrmDC-1, FW-Rip-Strm-DC-3, FWRip-Strm-DC-4, FW-Rip-WtlndsDC-2, FW-WFP-O-1, FW-WFPO-2, FW-WFP-O-3, FW-WFP-O4 

174

Measures such as fencing to exclude livestock, vegetation projects, and 

special management prescriptions will be undertaken until the affected areas 

are brought into satisfactory riparian condition.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-Rip-All-G-1, 

FW-Rip-All-G-3, FW-Rip-AllMgtApp-A, FW-Rip-Strm-G-2, 

FW-Rip-Strm-MgtApp-A

174 Coordinate with other resource functions to pursue instream flow rights to 

protect aquatic ecosystems, fish, and wildlife.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Rip-AllDC-2, FW-Rip-All-DC-3, FWWater-G-3, FW-Water-MgtAppD, FW-Water-MgtApp-E, FWWater-MgtApp-G, FW-WaterMgtApp-H

174

Maintain or improve nesting cover and waterfowl forage on existing waterfowl 

islands and shorelines. In conjunction with construction of waterfowl islands 

seed herbaceous species unpalatable to large herbivores.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-DC-3, 

FW-WFP-DC-8, FW-WFP-G-3, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-B, FW-WFP-MgtApp-C, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-D

175 Maintain riparian and meadow communities by providing waters for wildlife 

and livestock away from these sensitive areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-ConstWat-DC-1, FWConstWat-G-1, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, FW-Rip-AllG-1, FW-Rip-All-G-2
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

81

Management Area 12 – Riparian and Open Water

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

175 Modify watershed improvement structures where possible to provide water for 

wildlife.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FW-WFPDC-3, FW-WFP-G-3 

175

Manage lakes and streams to improve fisheries habitat by constructing 

structures and barriers as appropriate based on environmental analysis and 

on professional judgment of the responsible official and resource specialist: 

 - Install 10 stream improvement projects on perennial streams in first decade; 

Improve fish habitat through placement of 200 cover structures on lake 

bottoms during the first decade; Create spawning habitat of 10 acres per 

year in lakes in the first decade.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-4, FW-WFP-DC-6, 

FW-WFP-DC-8, FW-WFP-DC-9, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-D, FW-WFPO-1, FW-WFP-O-2, FW-WFP-O4 

175

Salt is used to help achieve proper livestock grazing distribution. Permanent 

salt is not placed within 1/4 mile of the edge of any riparian area. Temporary 

salting may be approved if it will help to achieve a specific management 

objective for enhancement of riparian areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-5, 

FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, FW-GrazMgtApp-B 

175 Proper allowable use within MA 12 is not to exceed 20 percent on the woody 

vegetation.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, FW-GrazMgtApp-B, FW-Rip-All-DC-1, 

FW-Rip-All-G-1

176

Favor the establishment of woody riparian vegetation, where potential natural 

vegetation has been determined through an interdisciplinary process to 

include woody riparian species. Control livestock grazing through 

management and/or fencing to allow for adequate establishment of vegetation 

and the elimination of overuse. Evaluate seeding projects for effects on 

concentrating livestock use in riparian and other sensitive areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-GrazMgtApp-A, FW-Graz-MgtApp-B, 

FW-Rip-All-DC-5, FW-Rip-All-G1, FW-Rip-RipType-G-3 

176 No precommercial thinning or piling thinning slash in riparian areas or areas 

that have riparian characteristics.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC2, FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-Rip-AllDC-1, FW-Rip-All-G-1

176

Plan for suitable filter strips between streamcourses and disturbed areas 

and/or road locations. See Filter Strip Table in Forest-wide Standards and 

Guidelines under Watershed/Soil/Air, F2. Plan for suitable filter strips between 

stream courses and ground disturbing activities including roads.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-2, FW-RdsFacG-1, FW-RdsFac-G-5, FW-RipAll-G-3, FW-Rip-All-MgtApp-A, 

FW-Rip-Strm-G-2, FW-Rip-StrmMgtApp-A, FW-Water-MgtApp-L
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

82

Management Area 12 – Riparian and Open Water

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

176

Conduct an on-site soil investigation where needed to identify soil properties 

of riparian sites not delineated in the T.E.S. inventory due to mapping scale 

and inclusions such as soils with aquic subgroups, aquic soil moisture 

regimes, and poorly drained properties.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Soil-MgtApp-A, FW-SoilMgtApp-B 

177

Mineral material excavation with the riparian zone may be allowed after 

environmental analysis. Authorized mineral activities will maintain or improve 

riparian conditions.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Minerals-DC-1, FWMinerals-G-1, FW-Minerals-G-4, 

FW-Rip-All-G-1, FW-Rip-All-G-2, 

FW-Rip-All-G-3, FW-Rip-AllMgtApp-A

177

New special-uses are normally not allowed in riparian areas unless they 

benefit riparian management. Exceptions which cannot be avoided, such as 

utility lines or roads crossing stream courses, are designed to minimize the 

amount of riparian affected and the degree of effects.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-1, FWSpecUse-G-3 

177

Fight fire aggressively, if necessary, to prevent resource damage, using 

suppression methods that minimize long-term adverse impacts to riparian 

habitats.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Rip-All-G-1 

Management Area 13 – Cinder Hills Off-Highway Vehicle Area

Management Area 13 – Cinder Hills Off-Highway Vehicle 

Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

179

Actively manage for OHV use by increasing facilities to match use, better 

signing and trail designation, more on-site presence, and road improvement. 

Coordinate administration/enforcement with the National Park Service.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FWInterpEd-DC-5, FW-Rec-All-G-8, 

FW-Rec-Disp-G-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-6, MA-VolcanWd-DC3, MA-VolcanWd-MgtApp-A, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-B

179 Management Indicator Species for this MA are mule deer, pygmy nuthatch, 

and hairy woodpecker

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

83

Management Area 13 – Cinder Hills Off-Highway Vehicle 

Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

179

Manage for Visual Quality Objectives (VQO's) of Partial Retention, and 

Modification. The VQO's should be Partial Retention as seen from Doney 

Park, Highway 89, Sunset Crater Volcano National Monument vistas, and FR 

545; and Modification from roads crossing the area.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-Scenic-G1, MA-VolcanWd-DC-5 

179 Manage OHV use to provide recreational opportunities and coordinate with 

needs of other recreation users and other resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-AllG-1, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-1, FWRec-Disp-DC-2, FW-Rec-DispG-1, FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-E, 

MA-VolcanWd-DC-3, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-A, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-B

180

See the Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map (Appendix M) 

and manage uses to meet these objectives. On busy summer weekends, the 

number of encounters with other recreationists will likely be outside 

parameters set for Semi-primitive settings and this is acceptable.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllDC-6, FW-Rec-All-G-2 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

84

Management Area 13 – Cinder Hills Off-Highway Vehicle 

Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

180

This MA is open to unrestricted cross-country travel except where signed 

closed. Other portions may be closed in the future based on reasons listed 

below. The area also contains some designated routes for entry and 

navigation through the area. 

Reasons for closing areas may include: 

 - Protection of geologic features tied to Sunset Crater 

 - Scenic integrity of steep slopes facing the Sunset Crater Overlook, the 

Doney Park communities, and Highway 89 

 - Presence of archaeological sites that could be damaged (usually located 

under a cinder layer) or other places of traditional cultural importance 

 - Maintenance of ground vegetation necessary for ecosystem function 

 - Sensitive plant locations, such as Penstemon cluteii 

 - Needs of off-road users 

 - User safety 

 - Manageability 

 - Excessive erosion resulting in cinder removal down to mineral soil and 

subsequent erosion or resulting bare tree roots exposed at mineral soil

Reasons for keeping areas open may include: 

 - Low visibility from communities or from the Monument (interior of this MA) 

 - Quality of the ATV/sandrail experience 

 - To provide for a variety of OHV experiences 

 - Proximity to camping areas 

- Low or absent vegetative cover

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-DC-1, 

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-AllG-1, FW-Scenic-DC-2, MAVolcanWd-DC-1, MA-VolcanWdDC-5 

181 Vehicle sound emissions will be required to meet State standards, or in the 

absence of State standards, industry or other standards.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in plan 

component, but proposed 

revised plan includes 

additional direction related to 

this topic.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllG-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-RecDisp-DC-2 

181

Improve and maintain boundary and interior signing. Cooperate with NPS to 

construct a physical barrier delineating the OHV area from the National 

Monument boundary if motorized incursions continue.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-2, FW-RecDisp-G-1, FW-Rec-Disp-S-1, 

MA-VolcanWd-DC-3, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-B
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

85

Management Area 13 – Cinder Hills Off-Highway Vehicle 

Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

181

Improve or re-locate improved roads and locate camping in order to disperse 

riders, provide additional areas for enjoyment, and lessen use in sensitive 

areas. This includes limiting through traffic to the Sunset Volcano-Wupatki 

Scenic Loop Drive (FR545), and improvement of roads in the interior of the 

area. Criteria for access and camping design include: location of riding areas, 

presence of Penstemon cluteii habitat, dispersing riders, improving visual 

quality, and protection and rehabilitation needs of impaired vegetation and 

soils.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G7, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-AllG-2, FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-B 

182

There are known populations of non-native and invasive plants in this MA 

(examples are diffuse knapweed and camelthorn). Continue efforts to control 

or eradicate plants, especially along roadways.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-DC-2, 

FW-Invas-G-1, FW-InvasMgtApp-A, FW-Invas-MgtApp-D

182

Prescribed fire using planned and unplanned ignitions is used to accomplish 

resource objectives except there is no provision for unplanned ignitions in 

areas included in the urban interface.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FWWUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, FWWUI-DC-4

183

Protect areas that are directly tied to the Sunset Crater eruption for future 

research, and visitor interpretation of the geologic story. Coordinate with the 

NPS to inventory, map, and assess conditions of the geologic features.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-VolcanWd-DC-1, MAVolcanWd-DC-3, MA-VolcanWdMgtApp-A, MA-VolcanWdMgtApp-B

183

Work with and establish interpretive messages and programs with the 

National Park Service and volunteers from OHV users. Including improved 

signing, information kiosks, and interpretive message at the Cinder Hills 

Overlook. Provide signing and information aimed at the following objectives: to 

prevent lost riders, to show opportunities of where to ride, to clearly depict 

boundaries and eliminate encroachment into Sunset Crater Volcano National 

Monument, and to identify dangerous and/or closed areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FWInterpEd-DC-3, FW-InterpEdDC-5, FW-InterpEd-MgtApp-C, 

FW-Rec-Disp-G-1, MAVolcanWd-G-1, MA-VolcanWdMgtApp-A, MA-VolcanWdMgtApp-B 

183 Coordinate with Sunset Crater Volcano and Wupatki National Monuments in 

managing dispersed recreation use adjacent to the Monuments.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-C, FWRec-Disp-MgtApp-E, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-A
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

86

Management Area 14 – Oak Creek Canyon 

Management Area 14 – Oak Creek Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

184 Consider recreation management methods that are consistent with wildlife 

habitat direction.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-G-3 

184

Participate with the Oak Creek Water Quality Task Force and assist with 

implementation of its recommendations. Collaborate with County and State 

governments to protect public health and safety by defining water quality 

monitoring and public health and safety risk management.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Water-MgtApp-A, FWWater-MgtApp-N 

184

Explore the need for and feasibility of reducing campfire smoke in Oak Creek 

Canyon from April to November to improve habitat conditions for bats, birds 

and other wildlife species.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-G-3, MA-OakCrk-DC10, MA-OakCrk-G-10

184 Use prescribed fire and mechanical methods to achieve fire management 

goals.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-Fire-MgtApp-B, FWTerrERU-All-G-1 

184 Ensure adequate instream flow to maintain aquatic communities and water 

sources for wildlife.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Rip-All-DC-2, 

FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, FW-RipStrm-DC-4, FW-Water-DC-2, 

FW-Water-G-3, FW-WFP-DC-1

185 Initiate collaboration with the AG&FD and the USFWS to determine the 

feasibility of reintroducing Gila trout into Oak Creek.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A 

185

Support research efforts that further define the habitat requirements of native 

fish and bat populations. Protect and/or restore habitat conditions that may be 

limiting these populations.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-3, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-B 

185 Ensure that there is an appropriate range of spawning, rearing and 

overwintering habitat to support the native fish community in Oak Creek.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Water-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-4, 

FW-WFP-G-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

87

Management Area 14 – Oak Creek Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

185

Ensure that woody materials, such as logs, tree limbs and snags, are present 

in riparian communities for prey base habitat, aquatic nutrient cycling and soil 

retention consistent with public safety.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rip-RipType-DC-4, FW-RipRipType-DC-5, FW-Rip-StrmDC-4, FW-Water-DC-2, FWWFP-DC-3, FW-WFP-DC-4

185 Acquire undeveloped private property needed to protect critical riparian 

habitats.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1 

185 Water quality in Oak Creek must comply with Arizona State water quality 

standards and the State Unique Water status of Oak Creek.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Water-DC-6, FW-Water-DC7, MA-OakCrk-MgtApp-C 

185 Discourage facility investments within the Oak Creek 100-year floodplain.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-6, FW-Rec-AllG-1, FW-Rec-Dev-G-1, FW-RipAll-G-3, FW-Rip-All-MgtApp-A, 

FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, FW-RipStrm-DC-3, FW-Rip-Strm-G-2, 

FW-Rip-Strm-MgtApp-A

185 Cooperate with the AG&FD to stock fish and provide fishing access to meet 

goals and objectives of the Arizona Cold Water Fisheries Strategic Plan.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-B 

185 Assess existing and proposed floodplain developments for their impacts on 

floodplain function and channel processes.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-6, FW-Rec-DevG-1, FW-Rip-All-G-1, FW-RipAll-G-3, FW-Rip-All-MgtApp-A, 

FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, FW-RipStrm-DC-3, FW-Rip-Strm-G-2, 

FW-Rip-Strm-MgtApp-A

185

State Highway 89A provides a high-quality scenic experience. Highway 

improvements should blend with existing natural-appearing features except 

when there are safety concerns that cannot be mitigated. Minimize the relative 

dominance (scale) of State Highway 89A to the extent possible/practical.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-ScenicRds-DC-1, SAScenicRds-DC-4, SAScenicRds-G-1, SA-ScenicRdsG-3
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

88

Management Area 14 – Oak Creek Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

185

National Forest land within Oak Creek Canyon should retain their natural 

characteristics. Identify private parcels on which development does, or could, 

detract from scenic integrity. Pursue methods for protecting scenic integrity 

such as scenic easements or acquisition.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1, FW-LndAdjMgtApp-B, FW-LndAdj-MgtAppD, FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-ScenicG-1, FW-Scenic-MgtApp-C, MAOakCrk-DC-11, MA-OakCrkMgtApp-B

186

Infrastructure on National Forest lands associated with private land needs, 

such as utilities, waterlines, roads and bridges, meets scenic goals, 

particularly as viewed from the highway and recreation sites.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-ScenicDC-7, FW-Scenic-DC-8, MAOakCrk-DC-11

186

Fire management activities are intense and focus on protection of life and 

property. Identify locations of high fuel buildup and potential National 

Forest/urban interface wildfire problems.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC10, FW-WUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC4, FW-WUI-G-1

186

Public/private land patterns and uses protect the riparian community and the 

surrounding scenic quality of Oak Creek Canyon. Identify private land 

important for acquisition.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1, FW-LndAdjMgtApp-B, FW-Scenic-DC-1, 

MA-OakCrk-DC-11

186

Strengthen partnerships with ADOT, Coconino County and private landowners 

to protect scenic quality, water quality and riparian resources and to provide a 

safe recreational driving experience on the highway.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-7, FW-Rec-AllMgtApp-E, FW-Scenic-MgtAppB, FW-Water-MgtApp-K, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-A

186 Slide Rock base-for-exchange land is intended for acquisition by Slide Rock 

State Park to better facilitate management of the creek and the park.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-G-13, MA-OakCrkS-5 

186

Oak Creek Canyon is an area of contrasting recreation settings, ranging from 

heavily used highway to highly developed recreation sites and resorts to 

primitive trails. Manage most of the Canyon for Rural or Roaded Natural ROS 

settings. Management should be consistent with a Rural and Roaded Natural 

ROS setting adjacent to the road. In areas more remote from the road 

influence, the setting should transition to a Semi-primitive ROS setting. 

Access to the West Fork of Oak Creek should have a Semi-primitive 

character.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-2, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FWRec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-All-G-1, 

FW-Rec-All-G-2, MA-OakCrkDC-4, MA-OakCrk-DC-6, MAOakCrk-G-8 

186 The recreation experience should not be significantly affected by crowding at 

recreation sites or on State Highway 89A.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllG-1, MA-OakCrk-DC-4, MAOakCrk-DC-8, MA-OakCrk-G-7
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

89

Management Area 14 – Oak Creek Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

187

Increase day-use opportunities emphasizing nature-based activities such as 

hiking, picnicking, bird watching, photography, fishing and interpretation. 

Increase opportunities for people to access the water and enjoy the creek.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-8, FW-Rec-All-DC-9, FWRec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, 

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-5, FW-RecDisp-G-5, MA-OakCrk-DC-4, 

MA-OakCrk-DC-5, MA-OakCrkDC-6, MA-OakCrk-DC-9, MAOakCrk-G-8

187 Litter control is a priority through enforcement, refuse and recycling facilities 

and litter patrols.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEd-G1, FW-Rec-All-DC-5, FW-RecDisp-DC-3

187

Collaborate with State Parks to better meet visitor needs and protect 

resources in the vicinity of Slide Rock. Evaluate Halfway Picnic Ground for 

future needs for parking, coordinating this effort with Slide Rock State Park.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-MgtApp-D 

187

Limit the amount of development and consolidate parking and facility 

development where possible to minimize resource impacts in the Canyon. Use 

such methods as alternative modes of transportation, roadside parking limits 

and parking fees. Develop a strategy to minimize private vehicle traffic and 

reduce parking impacts, thus improving scenic quality and safety. Encourage 

alternative modes of transportation that reduce automobile dependency and 

traffic congestion. Investigate the feasibility of shuttle services for Oak Creek 

Canyon. The level of private recreation traffic in the Canyon should be 

consistent with a high-quality recreation experience.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-DC-8, MA-OakCrkG-7, MA-OakCrk-MgtApp-A 

187

Provide scenic turnouts along State Highway 89A where appropriate. 

Locations for consideration are Banjo Bill, Bootlegger, Midgely Bridge and the 

Sedona City limits.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-MgtApp-A, MARedRock-DC-8 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

90

Management Area 14 – Oak Creek Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

187

Develop a trails strategy for Oak Creek Canyon that: 

u allows for creek access while protecting the riparian community, wildlife 

habitat and sensitive plants; 

u improves trail access and orientation information; 

u provides loop trail opportunities with existing trails that lead to the rim of Oak 

Creek Canyon and other management areas; 

u expands opportunities for interpretive trails and pleasure walking at sites 

such as Cave Springs Campground, Call of the Canyon, the West Fork of Oak 

Creek and/ campgrounds and picnic areas; 

u maintains historical trails that access the rim of Oak Creek Canyon, such as 

the Telephone, Purtyman, Harding Springs, Cookstove, Thomas Point, 

Thompson Ladder and Casner trails; 

u supports transportation goals; and 

u considers a safe pedestrian route extending the length of Oak Creek 

Canyon from uptown Sedona to Oak Creek Vista.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-B, FWRec-Trails-DC-1, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-2, MA-OakCrk-DC-3, MAOakCrk-DC-5, MA-OakCrk-DC9, MA-OakCrk-G-7 

187-1 Assess the need for upgrading campground facilities to meet demands for 

group use, showers and child-play areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-1, FW-RecDev-DC-7, MA-OakCrk-G-9 

187-1 Develop a rock-climbing management strategy for the Oak Creek Vista area 

that addresses climbing needs, visitor safety and resource protection.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-B 

187-1 

Redesign the Wilson Mountain Trailhead area to avoid the crowding and traffic 

problems that currently exist at Midgely Bridge and to improve the appearance 

and accessibility of view access trails at Midgely Bridge.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-10, FW-RecTrails-DC-3, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1 

187-1 

Use a scenic corridor action plan to develop more specific direction for Oak 

Creek Canyon to guide scenic, transportation and recreation elements. 

Manage Oak Creek Vista primarily for short-duration visits emphasizing 

interpretation and orientation to Oak Creek Canyon and the redrock country.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-B, MAOakCrk-DC-4, MA-OakCrk-DC6, MA-OakCrk-G-8 

187-1 Open Wilson Mountain trail to equestrian use. Provide horse trailer parking at 

the Jim Thompson Trailhead to access Wilson Mountain Trail.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-DC-3, MA-OakCrkDC-6, MA-OakCrk-DC-8 

187-1 

Reduce heavy smoke build-up in Oak Creek Canyon through such methods 

as requiring campers to burn only dry wood, prohibiting wood gathering and 

prohibiting campfires at certain times.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-DC-10, MA-OakCrkG-10
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

91

Management Area 14 – Oak Creek Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

187-1 

Reduce impacts on water quality by such methods as: 

 - placing toilets in strategic locations, 

 - providing information about proper sanitation practices, 

 - limiting equestrian use, and 

 - installing shower and hand-washing facilities and more gray-water disposal 

sites.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-7, FW-InterpEd-G-1, FWRec-All-DC-5, FW-Rec-All-G-1, 

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-3, FW-RecTrails-G-1, MA-OakCrk-G-9

187-1 

Restore damaged sites along Oak Creek, including but not limited to the 

Ladders, the pools upstream from Slide Rock, Midgely pools, Pumphouse and 

Hawkeye.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G2, MA-OakCrk-DC-6 

187-1 Prohibit National Forest access to Slide Rock recreation area except through 

the State Park and prohibit parking along State Highway 89A in this vicinity.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-G-6, MA-OakCrkMgtApp-A, MA-OakCrk-MgtAppD

187-2 Prohibit camping and recreation fires except in designated sites.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-S-2 

187-2 Encourage alternative modes of transportation provided by commercial tours 

to help reduce the impacts of traffic and parking.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-DC-8, MA-OakCrkG-7 

187-2 Withdraw Oak Creek Canyon MA from locatable and leasable mineral entry.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Minerals-DC-3, FWMinerals-G-1 

187-2 

Minerals materials operations are discouraged, though some activities may be 

appropriate for ADOT and Forest Service administration needs if they are 

minor and consistent with MA objectives and goals.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Minerals-DC-2, MA-OakCrkG-12

187-2 

Agencies communicate and work together with local organizations to achieve 

goals for the Canyon. There is ongoing communication among community 

organizations, interest groups and homeowner associations.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-OakCrk-MgtApp-A, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-C, MA-OakCrkMgtApp-D, MA-OakCrk-MgtAppE, MA-OakCrk-MgtApp-F

187-2 

Regulations (e.g., parking rules and prohibitions against littering) are known 

and enforced. Visitors are properly informed about services, facilities, rules 

and environmental ethics.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEd-G1, FW-Rec-All-DC-5, MAOakCrk-DC-1

187-3 

Develop an interpretive trail outside of Wilderness at Call of the Canyon to 

reduce pressure on the Oak Creek RNA and to meet the demand for access 

and interpretation along Oak Creek.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllG-2, MA-OakCrk-DC-6, MAOakCrk-DC-9, MA-OakCrk-G-8
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

92

Management Area 14 – Oak Creek Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

187-3 

Through a variety of interpretive efforts, people learn about geology, riparian 

communities and biodiversity and will be motivated to practice careful 

stewardship.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEd-G1, FW-Rec-All-DC-5, MAOakCrk-DC-1

187-3 

Provide an easily accessible directory to recreation opportunities and 

interpretive activities and a wide variety of publications and interactive 

materials at Oak Creek Vista.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEd-G1, FW-Rec-All-DC-5, MAOakCrk-DC-1

187-3 

Visitors should feel welcomed to Oak Creek Canyon and know where to go to 

enjoy the activities they seek. They should sense that they are entering a 

special location with unique and remarkable characteristics.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEd-G1, FW-Rec-All-DC-5, MAOakCrk-DC-1

187-3 

Interpretation should follow the themes established in the Sedona Ranger 

District Interpretive Strategy and more specific direction developed through 

further site-specific analysis and planning for Oak Creek Canyon.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FWInterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdMgtApp-A

Management Area 15 – Developed Recreation Sites 

Management Area 15 – Developed Recreation Sites

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

188 Manage for VQO's of Retention or Partial Retention with the exception of the 

Snow Bowl.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-Scenic-G1 

189

Conduct feasibility studies and develop project plans for site rehabilitation on a 

scheduled basis. Plans include upgrading of RIM Condition Classes 4-8 to 

Class 1. Site rehabilitation includes site grading, stream protection, vegetation 

establishment, and road improvement and realignment, where appropriate.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in plan 

component, but proposed 

revised plan includes 

additional direction related to 

this topic.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-Rec-DevDC-2, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-8, FWRec-Dev-G-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

93

Management Area 15 – Developed Recreation Sites

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

190 The Snow Bowl special-use authorization area will be fenced to physically 

exclude grazing.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-GrazMgtApp-A 

190 Monitor water quality and quantity in compliance with P.L. 92-500, Section 

208.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Water-DC-2, FW-Water-DC7, FW-Water-G-4, FW-WaterMgtApp-K 

190 Suppression objective is to minimize damage to improvements and/or 

resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-DC-4, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-2 

190 Prescribed fire using planned ignitions is used as a management tool where it 

is needed to accomplish resource objectives.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-WUI-DC-2

Management Area 16 – Inner Basin 

Management Area 16 – Inner Basin

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

192 Dispersed use is limited to day use, foot or bicycle traffic only. Signing needed 

to control use is provided, installed, and maintained by the City of Flagstaff.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, MA-InBsnG-7 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

94

Management Area 16 – Inner Basin

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

192

Continue to work with City of Flagstaff to minimize environmental impacts in 

the Inner Basin and to improve rehabilitation of areas disturbed through past 

development and maintenance such as Abineau Road. Encourage the City of 

Flagstaff to convert existing diesel pumps to electric pumps by establishing an 

underground electrical line into the Inner Basin using existing roads within the 

Basin. Evaluate the City of Flagstaff proposed water development projects 

using the NEPA process and monitor the projects. Identify rehabilitation needs 

caused by City activities and accomplish in conjunction with each project as 

needs occur.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-InBsn-MgtApp-A 

192

Limit vehicle access to City and Federal vehicles necessary to administer the 

area. The area is closed to livestock use and recreational livestock use such 

as horses, mules, or llamas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

MA-InBsn-DC-7, MA-InBsn-G-5, 

MA-InBsn-S-1 

192

The suppression objective is to hold fires to 10 acres or less. Choose 

suppression tactics that minimize damage to the soil and water resources. 

Prescribed fire using planned ignitions is used to accomplish fuel treatment 

and other resource objectives.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-WUI-DC-3 

Management Area 17 – Special Areas

Management Area 17 – Special Areas

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

194

Emphasize and protect watershed condition and maintain natural ecological 

conditions on the Research Natural Areas (RNA's) so that they are available 

for research and education that does not disturb the areas' natural condition. 

Use restrictions are imposed as necessary to keep areas in their natural or 

unmodified condition. There is no harvest of timber products, including 

firewood. RNA's are closed to off-road driving.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-2, SARNABotGeo-DC-1, SARNABotGeo-DC-2, SARNABotGeo-DC-3, SARNABotGeo-DC-4, SARNABotGeo-G-1, SARNABotGeo-G-5
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

95

Management Area 17 – Special Areas

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

194

The botanical areas and the geological area are managed to maintain, as 

nearly as possible, existing conditions and natural processes for public 

enjoyment, demonstration, and study. Interpretative and educational 

demonstration opportunities are emphasized and enhanced through selective 

facility development. Natural events are not rehabilitated. Off-road driving is 

prohibited.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-RdsFacS-1, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-2, SARNABotGeo-DC-5, SARNABotGeo-DC-6, SARNABotGeo-G-1 

195 As needed, assess carrying capacity in special areas and limit visitors to meet 

carrying capacity.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-AllG-2, FW-Rec-Disp-G-3 

195 RNA's and botanical areas are managed to protect and maintain their 

uniqueness and ecological condition.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, SA-RNABotGeoDC-1, SA-RNABotGeo-DC-5, 

SA-RNABotGeo-G-1, SARNABotGeo-G-4

195

AMP's will have provisions to protect the uniqueness and/or ecological 

condition of the special areas. Approved AMP's are revised and if necessary 

amended by 1992.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-RNABotGeo-G-4 

196 Do not allow special-use authorizations that would or could adversely affect or 

change the character of the areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-RNABotGeo-DC-5, SARNABotGeo-G-1, SARNABotGeo-G-5, SARNABotGeo-G-6 

196

Manage roads adjacent to botanical areas and the Red Mountain Geological 

Area to prevent vehicular intrusion. Block and obliterate existing roads 

entering the area in the first decade.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-3, FW-RdsFac-G6, FW-RdsFac-S-1, FW-RecDisp-DC-2, FW-Rec-Disp-G-1 

196 Use prescribed fire with planned ignitions as a management tool provided its 

use is compatible with the management of the specific area.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, SA-RNABotGeo-G-2, SARNABotGeo-G-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

96

Management Area 17 – Special Areas

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

196 Suppression tactics minimize damage to the character of RNA's and all other 

special areas.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, SARNABotGeo-G-2, SARNABotGeo-G-3

196-1 Access and management are consistent with preservation for research values.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-RNABotGeo-G-1, SARNABotGeo-G-5, SARNABotGeo-G-6 

196-1 

Non-commercial group size should be limited to 25 persons or fewer in 

Casner RNA and to 12 persons or fewer without a permit in the West Fork of 

Oak Creek.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-RNABotGeo-G-6 

196-1 

Manage Casner RNA for a Semi-primitive Non-Motorized ROS setting. 

Manage Oak Creek RNA consistent with Wilderness-defined Primitive WOS 

setting criteria. Recognize the high level of hiking use in the lower part of West 

Fork through Oak Creek RNA as more consistent with Roaded Natural ROS 

setting criteria.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, MA-OakCrk-DC-4, MARedRock-DC-7 

196-1 

Limit visitor access and use to environmentally acceptable levels to maintain 

the research values of the RNA. Employ various methods such as using a 

permit system and providing alternative recreation opportunities and more 

intense management.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-RNABotGeo-G-6 

196-1 Prohibit overnight camping and recreation fires in Casner RNA.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-RNABotGeo-S-1 

196-1 Restrict camping and prohibit recreation fires in Oak Creek RNA.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-RNABotGeo-S-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

97

Management Area 17 – Special Areas

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

196-2 Recreation use is not promoted and access is restricted as needed to keep 

these places in their natural, unmodified condition.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-RNABotGeo-DC-1, SARNABotGeo-G-1, SARNABotGeo-G-5, SARNABotGeo-G-6 

196-2 Prohibit permitted commercial tours except in support of approved research.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

SA-RNABotGeo-G-5, SARNABotGeo-S-2 

196-2 Withdraw Casner Canyon RNA from locatable and leasable mineral entry.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Minerals-G-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

98

Management Area 19 – Mogollon Rim

Management Area 19 – Mogollon Rim

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

200

Manage at least 1,281 acres in the tentatively suitable for old-growth on a 

sustained basis to achieve at least 640 acres meeting old-growth conditions at 

all times.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-MC-All-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-MC-All-G-3, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-10, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-11, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-7, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-DC-9, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-4, FWTerrERU-MC-MCIF-DC-9, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-1, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-4, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-6, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-7, FWTerrERU-PP-G-1, FW-TerrERUPP-G-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-G-3, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-4

204

Mixed conifer stringers, primarily Douglas-fir, are noncontiguous, narrow 

communities that extend into the ponderosa pine. Manage the mixed conifer 

stringers to emphasize wildlife habitat needs by maintaining big game cover 

except where environmental analysis indicates otherwise.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-4, FWTerrERU-All-G-4, FW-WFP-DC2, FW-WFP-DC-5, FW-WFP-DC7

204

Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer - Suppression objective is 100 acres or 

less. Use prescribed fire with planned and unplanned ignitions is used to meet 

resource objectives.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2

205 In developed recreation sites the suppression objective is to minimize damage 

to improvements and/or resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2 

205 Prescribed fire using planned ignitions is used as a management tool where 

such use is compatible with other resources.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtApp-A 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

99

Management Area 19 – Mogollon Rim

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

205

Fuel treatment projects in natural fuels are aimed at creating and maintaining 

a natural fuel condition that is maintained through the periodic use of 

prescribed fire.

Addressed in plan components 

and/or management 

approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1 

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area 

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-9 

The biological, physical and human elements of the landscape sustain 

ecological processes, functions and structures within a natural range of 

variability and conditions appropriate to the Sedona/Oak Creek ecosystem. 

Natural ecosystem disturbance patterns are conserved or restored consistent 

with human health and safety.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Eco-DC-2 

206-9 Habitats support diverse, healthy populations of native plants and animals. A 

natural variety of plant species, age classes and structure is present.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-1 

206-9 

Natural elements of the landscape are restored and protected. Threatened, 

endangered and sensitive species are recovering. Appropriate actions are 

taken to minimize impacts to these species.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Soil-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWWater-DC-2, FW-Water-DC-3, 

FW-Water-G-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-DC-5, 

FW-WFP-DC-8, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WFP-G-3

206-9 

Riparian communities have adequate in-stream flows and adequate plant 

cover to protect stream banks and dissipate energy during high flows. 

Channel characteristics and water support natural biodiversity.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Rip-All-DC2, FW-Rip-All-DC-5, FW-RipStrm-DC-1 

206-9 Soil function and long-term productivity are sustained so that the soil can 

resist erosion, recycle nutrients and absorb water.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-DC-2 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

100

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-9 

Fire should continue to play a natural ecological role within the constraints of 

human health and safety. The mosaic of vegetative patterns and conditions 

reduces the occurrence of catastrophic fires.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-TerrERU-All-G2 

206-9 The impacts of non-native plant and animal species are controlled and the 

introduction of new non-natives is discouraged.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-G-1 

206-10

Improve and protect water quality and long-term soil productivity and restore 

critical soil functions through such methods as: 

 - improving the rate of water infiltration, thereby reducing on-site soil loss and 

minimizing surface runoff and sedimentation; 

 - enhancing soil organic matter content to improve physical condition and 

increase nutrient cycling; 

 - reducing flood potential and securing favorable conditions of water flow; 

 - increasing and improving the distribution of vegetative ground cover and 

coarse woody debris; 

 - setting livestock capacities to levels that maintain and/or improve soil 

stability, soil productivity and water quality; 

 - locating new trails away from riparian communities, steep grades and 

sensitive soils; 

 - hardening trail and road surfaces and providing sanitation facilities at key 

places; and 

- improving road and trail maintenance.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacG-2, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, FW-SoilDC-1, FW-Soil-DC-2, FW-SoilDC-3, FW-Water-DC-2, FWWater-DC-6, FW-Water-G-4 

206-10

Seek out, use and share information from researchers, agencies and other 

individuals with knowledge about the southwestern willow flycatcher, brownheaded cowbird parasitism, predation and other related issues. Keep current 

on new information and make changes in the management of southwestern 

willow flycatcher habitat and populations accordingly.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2, FWWFP-G-3, FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-B 

206-10 Engage in activities that will maintain or enhance south western willow 

flycatcher habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2, FWWFP-G-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

101

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-10

Eliminate unneeded roads and redesign or relocate poorly located roads and 

trails to lessen impacts on such resources as cultural sites, soil, water and 

wildlife and to reduce user conflicts. Restore areas heavily damaged by 

vehicle or foot traffic using such methods as obliteration, barriers, closures 

and visitor information.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-RdsFacDC-1, FW-RdsFac-G-1, FWRdsFac-G-6, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-J, FW-Rec-Disp-G-1, 

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-4 

206-10 Manage Hedeoma diffusum by the direction presented in the ``Hedeoma 

diffusum Management Plan (1984)'' adopted by the Forest Plan.

Referenced in Appendix D 

and addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-S-1 

206-10

Protect occupied Cimicifuga Arizonica habitat. Restrict ground disturbing 

activities within the habitat and provide shade needed for perpetuation of the 

species. Relocate trails where necessary to protect occupied habitat. 

Implement conservation actions recommended by the ``Cimicifuga Arizonica 

Conservation Plan (1995).''

Referenced in Appendix D 

and addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-4, FW-RecTrails-G-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, FWWFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2, FWWFP-G-3, FW-WFP-S-1 

206-11 Expand the use of prescribed fire along with other mechanical methods to 

achieve area goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, FWFire-MgtApp-A, FW-TerrERUGrass-O-1, FW-TerrERU-MCMCFF-O-1, FW-TerrERU-MCMCFF-O-2, FW-TerrERU-PJ-O-1, 

FW-TerrERU-PP-O-1, FWTerrERU-PP-O-2

206-11

Fire management activities should: 

 - protect resource values, such as property and riparian and scenic elements; 

 - reduce natural and activity-generated fuels to lessen the risk of catastrophic 

fire; and 

 - restore ecosystem functions.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, FWFire-MgtApp-A, FW-TerrERU-AllG-1 

206-11

Maintain adequate plant cover/security for wildlife habitat needs. Retain dead 

and down woody materials, such as logs, limbs and flood debris, in riparian 

communities for prey base habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-DC-3, FW-WFP-DC-4, 

FW-WFP-G-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

102

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-11

Forest product removal, both personal and commercial, such as firewood 

gathering, Christmas tree cutting and livestock grazing, should be designed to 

maintain or restore ecosystem health and meet Sedona/Oak Creek Planning 

Area goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-2, 

FW-FProd-G-3, FW-FprodMgtApp-C 

206-11

Work with air tour companies and rock climbers to eliminate disturbing 

activities near occupied eyries during the peregrine falcon breeding season 

(March 1 to August 31) and to protect other raptor species.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-11, 

FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFP-G-8, FWWFP-MgtApp-E, FW-WFPMgtApp-H 

206-11

Work with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Sedona Airport 

Administration and air tour operators to minimize the effects of aircraft on 

threatened, endangered or sensitive animal species. Consider implementing 

special flight rules, particularly over suitable peregrine falcon nesting habitat 

and big game winter ranges such as on Schnebly Hill rim, Munds Mountain, 

Lee Mountain, Casner Mountain and Black Mountain.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-11, 

FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFP-G-8, FWWFP-MgtApp-E, FW-WFPMgtApp-H, SA-Wild-MgtApp-E 

206-11

Enforce native plant protection laws and prohibit plant collection without 

appropriate permits. Require special use permits to collect plants for 

commercial activities, such as landscape and ornamental purposes. These 

permits are granted only for locations in the Savannah MA (MA 27).

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-FProd-G-3, MA-HouseMtn-S1, MA-OakCrk-S-1, MA-RedRockS-6, MA-SedN-S-1, MA-SedN-S-3 

206-11 Restrict aircraft activities related to commercial filming to protect threatened, 

endangered and sensitive species.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-13

206-12 Protect the water quality of Oak Creek to assure public safety and meet State 

water quality standards.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Water-DC-7, FW-Water-G-4, 

FW-Water-MgtApp-B 

206-12

For the southwestern willow flycatcher: 

 - conduct site visits to identify suitable and potential habitat; 

 - inventory suitable habitat to locate nesting flycatchers; 

 - monitor sites currently and previously occupied; 

 - maintain and enhance suitable and occupied habitat; 

 - ensure that potential habitat progresses toward suitable habitat; and 

 - minimize disturbance to nesting birds.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-3, FWWFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-O-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

103

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-12

In general, the following guidelines (1 through 8) should be applied to 

threatened, endangered and sensitive species. If analysis or new information 

suggests a modification of these guidelines is needed, consultation with the 

US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) must occur.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A 

206-12

Communicate and cooperate with the USFWS and the Arizona Game & Fish 

Department (AG&FD) on efforts related to all threatened and endangered 

species.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-B 

206-12

Maintain riparian pasture and riparian exclosure fences to prevent livestock 

trespass, which can result in the degradation of threatened, endangered and 

sensitive species habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-Graz-G-4, FWGraz-MgtApp-A, FW-GrazMgtApp-B, FW-WFP-G-1, FWWFP-G-2, FW-WFP-G-3

206-12

Apply the ``Peregrine Falcon Recovery Plan'' and Addendum*. In addition, 

apply the following modifications, which reflect new information: 

 - locate new trail and trailhead developments at least a quarter but preferably 

a half mile from known peregrine falcon eyries; 

 - limit maintenance and construction of trails and trailheads located within half 

a mile of eyries during the breeding period from March 1 to August 31; 

 - prohibit blasting within one mile of an eyrie during the breeding season; 

 - survey all suspected peregrine falcon nest sites for occupancy prior to any 

new Forest Service activity occurring within half a mile of the nest; 

 - conduct any construction associated with closing roads located within 0.5 

mile of an eyrie during non-breeding seasons; 

 - conduct any construction, reconstruction or maintenance of roads located 

within 0.5 miles of an eyrie during non-breeding seasons; 

 - conduct prescribed burning only if prevailing winds will avoid inundating 

active peregrine falcon nests with smoke; and 

 - restrict fuel reduction activities that use motorized equipment such as 

vehicles, chain saws or chippers to at least a quarter mile from active 

peregrine falcon nests during the breeding season.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-G-11, FW-WFP-G-2, 

FW-WFP-G-8, FW-WFP-MgtAppE, FW-WFP-MgtApp-F, FW-WFPO-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

104

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-13

Personnel conducting inventory or monitoring for threatened, endangered or 

sensitive species must obtain permits and attend inventory and monitoring 

training prior to conducting these activities.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in 

plan component, but 

proposed revised plan 

includes additional direction 

related to this topic.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-B 

206-13

Compile, map in GIS and file in an electronic corporate database information 

obtained from threatened, endangered or sensitive species site visits, 

inventory and monitoring efforts.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-B 

206-13

Evaluate recreational impacts at sites with occupied, suitable or potential 

southwestern willow flycatcher or Mexican spotted owl habitat. Actions to 

minimize or remove adverse impacts may include, but are not limited to, area 

closures (seasonal or year-long), limits on group-use size, road closures, 

interpretation and education, fencing, special use permit requirements and 

trash management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, 

FW-SpecUse-G-1, FW-WFP-DC11, FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFPMgtApp-E, FW-WFP-MgtApp-F, 

FW-WFP-S-2 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

105

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-13

Southwestern willow flycatcher: 

 - Activities in occupied or suitable habitat must not reduce the suitability of the 

habitat nor disturb nesting birds during the breeding season. 

 - Coordinate with the USFWS, AG&FD and any other agency or organization 

involved in ongoing research to determine monitoring needs for occupied 

southwestern willow flycatcher sites. Information needs and site-specific 

considerations are important to determine the monitoring intensity/frequency 

and implementation strategy for monitoring occupied sites. 

 - Exclude livestock grazing in occupied southwestern willow flycatcher habitat 

to avoid direct impacts to flycatchers and their habitat. Allow grazing in 

occupied southwestern willow flycatcher habitat outside of its critical season 

only where flycatcher research is occurring under a research plan approved 

by USFWS and other project cooperators. 

 - Implement brown-headed cowbird control programs based on USFWS 

consultation requirements and site-specific determination of need. 

 - Occupied and suitable habitats should be inventoried annually to determine 

the presence of southwestern willow flycatchers. If inventory does not occur, 

the guidelines for occupied habitat apply. 

 - Site visits to potential habitat should be conducted every few years in order 

to document the area's progression toward suitable habitat characteristics. 

 - Activities in southwestern willow flycatcher potential habitat should not slow 

or prevent potential habitat from progressing toward suitable habitat 

conditions. 

 - Coordinate with fire management personnel to develop a strategy for 

responding to wildfires that could threaten occupied, suitable or potential 

southwestern willow flycatcher habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, 

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-WFP-DC-11, 

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-3, FWWFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-E 

206-14

Use Terrestrial Ecosystem Survey (TES) information to determine capability, 

suitability, potentials and limitations of soils for different land management 

uses and desired conditions and to predict the behavior and performance of 

soils.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Soil-MgtApp-A, FW-SoilMgtApp-B 

206-14

The following riparian standards are repeated here for clarity but have not 

changed from the existing Forest Plan direction: 

 - maintain at least three age classes of woody riparian species, with at least 

10 percent of the woody plant cover in sprout, seedlings and saplings; 

- retain snags in riparian communities if they are not a safety hazard.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-RipRipType-DC-1, FW-Rip-RipTypeDC-2, FW-Rip-RipType-DC-3, 

FW-Rip-Spr-DC-2, FW-Rip-StrmDC-3, FW-Rip-Wtlnds-DC-2
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

106

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-14 Collaborate as needed with Federal or State agencies for the reintroduction 

and maintenance of native plant and wildlife species.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A 

206-14 Encourage use of certified exotic- and weed-free pelletized feed or hay, 

especially in Wildernesses, to reduce the spread of undesirable plants.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-6 

206-14 Restrict National Forest visitor activities from any area as needed to support 

soil and plant restoration efforts.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-G-3 

206-14 Provide and maintain high-quality opportunities for people to enjoy the Sedona 

area's many scenic and aesthetic qualities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-ScenicDC-2, FW-Scenic-G-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-1, MA-HouseMtnDC-6, MA-OakCrk-DC-1, MAOakCrk-DC-11, MA-RedRockDC-1, MA-RedRock-DC-10, MASedN-DC-1, MA-SedN-DC-4 

206-15 Cultural and historic features are recognized for their inherent scenic values.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdG-1, FW-Scenic-DC-6, MAOakCrk-DC-2, MA-RedRock-DC1 

206-15 Evidence of human activities and developments such as roads, trails and 

facilities, is visually subordinate to the natural-appearing landscape.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-7, FW-Scenic-DC8, FW-Scenic-G-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-6, MA-HouseMtnG-3, MA-OakCrk-DC-11, MAOakCrk-G-3, MA-RedRock-DC10, MA-RedRock-DC-8, MASedN-DC-4 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

107

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-15

Except in the Neighborwoods, Oak Creek Canyon and Redrock Frontcountry 

MAs, visitors see a landscape that appears to be largely unaltered by human 

influence and where natural elements and the visible effects of natural 

processes predominate.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-DC2, FW-Scenic-G-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-6, MA-OakCrk-DC11, MA-RedRock-DC-10, MASedN-DC-4

206-15 Long-term soil and plant productivity, properly functioning ecosystems and 

clean water are considered important components of scenic quality.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-3 

206-15 Scenic quality meets public expectations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-DC2, FW-Scenic-G-1, MA-OakCrkDC-1, MA-RedRock-DC-1 

206-15 Views of dramatic natural features are protected and enhanced.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-G-1, FWScenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-DC-2, 

FW-Scenic-G-1, MA-HouseMtnDC-6, MA-OakCrk-DC-11, MARedRock-DC-1, MA-RedRockDC-10, MA-SedN-DC-4

206-15 Views of the night sky remain unaffected by human light sources.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Air-DC-2, MA-OakCrk-DC-10

206-15

Activities by National Forest visitors protect the scenic quality of the 

Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area. This includes activities conducted by other 

agencies such as the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), local 

governments, and land use activities conducted by commercial or private 

entities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-G1, FW-Scenic-MgtApp-B 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

108

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-15 Facility design and location retain and enhance the traveler's sense of arrival 

at a special place.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdG-1, FW-RdsFac-G-10, FWRdsFac-MgtApp-K, FW-Rec-DevMgtApp-E, FW-Scenic-DC-7, MAHouseMtn-G-1, MA-OakCrk-G-1, 

MA-OakCrk-G-8, MA-RedRockDC-1, MA-RedRock-DC-5, MARedRock-DC-8, MA-RedRock-G1, MA-SedN-G-1 

206-15

The design of National Forest developments such as trailheads and

campgrounds is consistent with the appropriate ROS setting objectives. (Refer 

to Map 3 - Recreation Opportunity Spectrum Objectives)

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-10, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-K, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FWRec-Dev-DC-5, FW-Rec-DevMgtApp-E, FW-Scenic-DC-7 

206-15 Commercial tours blend visually into the landscape and do not draw attention 

to the activity or equipment.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-SpecUseDC-7, FW-SpecUse-DC-8 

206-15

Developments such as roads, trails, camping and day-use sites and trailheads 

borrow from local materials and landscape characteristics to blend with the 

adjacent natural appearing landscape. Management activities such as 

firewood harvest and prescribed fire result in alterations that appear natural to 

most visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-10, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-K, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-2, 

FW-Rec-Dev-MgtApp-E, FWScenic-DC-7, FW-Scenic-G-1, 

FW-Scenic-G-2, FW-Scenic-G-3 

206-16 Achieve scenic quality recovery in the shortest possible time.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-DC2, FW-Scenic-DC-3, FW-ScenicG-1, FW-Scenic-O-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

109

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-16

Complete scenic resource assessments for developments and projects on 

National Forest lands that could affect scenic quality. Include evaluation of 

cumulative effects.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-K, FW-RecDev-MgtApp-E, FW-Scenic-DC-2, 

FW-Scenic-DC-8, FW-Scenic-DC9, FW-Scenic-G-1, SAScenicRds-DC-4 

206-16

Follow scenic management guidelines established under the Forest Service 

Scenery Management System (SMS) and Guidelines for Highways on 

National Forest Land (ADOT and USFS, 1994).

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-Scenic-G1, FW-Scenic-MgtApp-B, MAHouseMtn-DC-6, MA-OakCrk-DC11, MA-RedRock-DC-10, MASedN-DC-4 

206-16

Protect native plants to the extent possible by site design and mitigation 

measures during construction. Develop native plant rehabilitation measures 

for disturbed areas to speed scenic quality recovery. Use methods that result 

in a natural vegetative composition and pattern.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-G-1, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-N, FW-Scenic-DC-3, FWScenic-DC-4, FW-Scenic-G-4 

206-16

Avoid placement of new structures where they will interfere with scenic views 

from primary viewing areas such as highways, recreation sites, trails and 

residential areas. Use natural land forms and vegetation to the extent possible 

to screen facilities from important viewing locations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Dev-MgtApp-E, FWScenic-DC-10, FW-Scenic-DC-3, 

FW-Scenic-DC-7, FW-Scenic-DC8, FW-Scenic-DC-9, MARedRock-DC-1 

206-16

Bury utility lines such as pipelines, power lines, fiber optic lines and telephone 

lines unless there are overriding environmental or technical concerns that 

would prevent burial. Existing utility or road corridors should be used for the 

placement of new utilities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-2, FWSpecUse-DC-3, FW-SpecUse-G9, FW-Trbl-DC-1 

206-16 Contemporary American Indian values are respected and considered in Forest 

Service management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Trbl-DC-1, FW-Trbl-G-2, FWTrbl-MgtApp-A, FW-Trbl-MgtAppB, FW-Trbl-MgtApp-C 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

110

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-16

Human uses support the stewardship of cultural resources. Visitors and 

residents understand and respect the fragile cultural resources of the Verde 

Valley. People know and act within the laws that apply to archaeological sites 

and resources.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-10, FW-Hrtg-DC-7, 

FW-Hrtg-G-5, FW-InterpEd-DC-1, 

MA-OakCrk-DC-2, MA-RedRockDC-4 

206-16

National Historic Register resources are protected, enhanced, interpreted and 

available for research and/or visitation. The Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area 

is recognized as an outdoor museum and classroom for the study of historic, 

prehistoric and contemporary cultural heritage.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-DC-2, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-5, FW-Hrtg-DC-7, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-9, MA-OakCrk-DC-2, 

MA-RedRock-DC-1, MARedRock-DC-2 

206-17 Ensure appropriate protection measures are in place at cultural interpretive 

sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-DC-2, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-4, FW-Hrtg-DC-7, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-8, FW-Hrtg-G-2, FWHrtg-G-3, FW-Hrtg-G-5, FW-HrtgG-6 

206-17 Allow for a “sense of discovery'' at cultural interpretive sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-12, FW-Hrtg-DC-7, 

FW-Hrtg-G-2, FW-Hrtg-G-5, FWHrtg-MgtApp-N

206-17 Archaeological site etiquette information is readily available to National Forest 

visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-7, FW-Hrtg-DC-9 

206-17

Encourage partnerships with American Indians, commercial ventures, 

volunteers and universities for documenting, preserving, interpreting and 

managing sites and to evaluate and develop creative management 

opportunities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-5, FW-Hrtg-MgtAppA, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-F, FW-HrtgMgtApp-O, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-P, 

FW-Trbl-MgtApp-B, FW-TrblMgtApp-C 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

111

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-17

Identify Traditional Cultural Properties and consult on their management with 

the appropriate American Indian communities. Traditional Cultural Properties 

(TCP) are recognized, respected, preserved and managed for continued 

traditional uses.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Trbl-DC-2, FW-Trbl-G-2 

206-17 Identify and retain evidence of valued historic/prehistoric landscape elements, 

such as orchards, fields, ditches, buildings and ruins.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-OakCrk-DC-2 

206-17 Inventory distinctive historic features and recognize their interpretive potential.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-G-1, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-C, 

FW-Hrtg-O-1, FW-Hrtg-O-2 

206-17

Inventory historic trails and wagon roads and determine their feasibility for use 

as non-motorized trails. Include the Old Munds Highway, the Old County Road 

and the Lime Kiln Road.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-10, FW-Hrtg-DC-7, 

FW-Hrtg-G-5 

206-17 Complete cultural surveys of all Forest system trails in order to facilitate 

maintenance and reconstruction activities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-O-1, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1 

206-17 Implement stabilization and conservation programs at damaged sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-2, FW-Hrtg-DC-4, 

FW-Hrtg-G-3, FW-Hrtg-G-4 

206-17 Eliminate unofficial trails that lead to archaeological sites to protect sites from 

damage.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-G-4, FW-Rec-Trails-DC11, FW-Rec-Trails-G-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

112

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-17 Eliminate effects of aircraft on cultural resources.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-S-1, MA-OakCrk-G11, MA-RedRock-G-3, MA-SedNG-4 

206-17

Prohibit uses on archaeological or historic sites that cause site damage and/or 

that are inconsistent with the protection and use of Traditional Cultural 

Properties.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-DC-2, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-3, FW-Hrtg-DC-4, 

FW-Hrtg-G-6 

206-17

Consider a full range of methods to mitigate or minimize impacts on cultural 

sites, such as: 

 - redesign or cancellation of a proposed project; 

 - site avoidance, data recovery, interpretation or adaptive reuse; 

 - fill on top of sites; 

 - relocation of a resource; 

 - fencing, barriers, restricted access and site closures; 

 - interpretation and documentation; and 

- discouraging commercial marketing of archaeological sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-Hrtg-DC-8, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-9, FW-Hrtg-G-3, FWHrtg-G-4 

206-18 Prohibit commercial filming at cultural sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-14
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

113

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-18

Harmony exists between residents and visitors. Residents have a sense of 

safety and security concerning National Forest lands directly adjacent to 

residential development.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-1, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-2, MA-HouseMtnDC-3, MA-HouseMtn-G-4, MAHouseMtn-G-6, MA-HouseMtnMgtApp-C, MA-OakCrk-DC-1, 

MA-OakCrk-DC-4, MA-OakCrkDC-8, MA-OakCrk-G-10, MAOakCrk-G-9, MA-OakCrk-S-2, 

MA-RedRock-DC-5, MARedRock-DC-6, MA-RedRockDC-7, MA-RedRock-DC-8, MARedRock-G-4, MA-RedRock-G-5, 

MA-RedRock-G-7, MA-RedRockMgtApp-D, MA-RedRock-S-1, 

MA-RedRock-S-3, MA-RedRockS-4, MA-RedRock-S-5, MA-SedNDC-3, MA-SedN-G-5, MA-SedNMgtApp-A, MA-SedN-MgtApp-B, 

MA-SedN-S-2 

206-18 Land ownership patterns of private holdings and National Forest meet the 

needs of the community and achieve National Forest goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-DC-1, FW-LndAdj-G1, FW-LndAdj-G-2, FW-LndAdjMgtApp-D 

206-18

The community shares National Forest stewardship goals. Community 

members understand their stake in ecological health and collaborate in 

National Forest decisions that are mutually beneficial to the National Forest 

and the community.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-LndAdjMgtApp-D, FW-LndAdj-MgtAppG, MA-HouseMtn-MgtApp-C, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-E, MA-RedRockMgtApp-D, MA-SedN-MgtApp-E 

206-18 The Forest Service provides leadership in planning efforts that involve 

National Forest/community interface issues and multiple-agency jurisdictions.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-D, MAHouseMtn-MgtApp-C, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-E, MA-RedRockMgtApp-D, MA-SedN-MgtApp-D
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

114

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-18 Acquire priority private parcels from willing sellers, when possible, through 

methods other than land trades within the planning area.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-S-3, MA-RedRockG-8, MA-RedRock-S-7, MARedRock-S-8 

206-19 Cooperate with local governments to identify and maintain appropriate trail 

access on private lands through the private land development process.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-DC-2, FW-LndAdjMgtApp-C, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, 

FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-C, FWRec-Trails-MgtApp-D, FW-RecTrails-MgtApp-E 

206-19

Protect community values by reducing fire hazard and risk. Update the Fire 

Prevention Strategy and address the fire risk and hazard that exist in the 

urban interface.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-1, FWFire-MgtApp-D, FW-Fire-MgtAppF, FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-G 

206-19

Ensure that residents adjacent to National Forest lands understand the natural 

environment and are partners in managing the neighboring Forest lands for 

public use and resource protection.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-7, FW-InterpEd-G-1, FWInterpEd-MgtApp-B, FW-InterpEdMgtApp-D, FW-Water-MgtApp-K, 

MA-HouseMtn-MgtApp-C, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-E, MA-RedRockMgtApp-D, MA-SedN-MgtApp-B 

206-19 Collaborate with local governments, agencies and residents to protect 

resources and address residents' concerns.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-MgtApp-C, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-E, MA-OakCrkMgtApp-G, MA-RedRock-MgtAppD, MA-SedN-MgtApp-B 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

115

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-19

Work with land owners and local and regional governments to encourage 

private land uses that are compatible with National Forest goals for the 

Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-D, MAHouseMtn-MgtApp-C, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-E, MA-OakCrkMgtApp-G, MA-RedRock-MgtAppD, MA-SedN-MgtApp-B

206-19

Collaborate with local and regional governments and transportation agencies 

to meet future local and regional transportation needs, including the design 

and location of roadway improvements and routes and alternative modes of 

transportation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-F, FWRdsFac-MgtApp-E, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-H, MA-OakCrk-G-7 

206-19

Collaborate with local and regional governments in regional planning efforts to 

achieve land use patterns and land development consistent with community 

and National Forest goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-A, FWLndAdj-MgtApp-D 

206-20

Work with local and regional governments and road agencies to develop 

transportation solutions that reduce traffic and vehicle impacts on National 

Forest lands. Consider solutions that: 

 - restrict recreation site access to shuttle only; 

 - provide land for park-and-ride solutions; 

 - create incentives for the use of shuttles and other high-occupancy vehicles; 

 - place limits and fees on parking; and 

 - encourage alternative modes of transportation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-H, MAHouseMtn-MgtApp-A, MAOakCrk-G-7, MA-RedRockMgtApp-A, MA-SedN-MgtApp-B 

206-20

Land exchanges that dispose of National Forest in the Sedona/Oak Creek 

Ecosystem will occur only if they result in acquisition of National Forest lands 

in the Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-S-2, MA-OakCrkS-4, MA-RedRock-S-7, MA-SedNS-4 

206-20

Base-for-exchange lands are National Forest lands located at: 

 - Brewer Road (approximately 21 acres, Neighborwoods MA), 

 - Chapel of the Holy Cross (approximately 11 acres, Neighborwoods MA), 

 - Slide Rock area (approximately 13 acres, Oak Creek MA), 

 - Village of Oak Creek Golf Course (approximately 5 acres, Neighborwoods 

MA) and 

- The Dells (up to 800 acres, Gateway and Savannah MAs).

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-S-3, MA-OakCrkS-5, MA-RedRock-S-8, MA-SedNS-5 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

116

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-20

Land exchanges that dispose of National Forest land in The Dells area will 

occur only if they result in acquisition of high-priority private parcels elsewhere 

in the Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem. High priority private parcels total 

approximately 783 acres. (Refer to Map 2 – Base-for-Exchange/Priority 

Acquisition Lands) High-priority land acquisition parcels include: 

 - Lincoln Canyon, 

 - Woo Ranch, 

 - Hancock Ranch, 

 - Bradshaw Ranch, 

 - Tree Farm, 

 - Cockscomb and 

- Tucker Property.

Addressed in plan

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-G-7, MAHouseMtn-S-2, MA-HouseMtn-S3, MA-OakCrk-G-14, MA-OakCrkS-4, MA-OakCrk-S-5, MARedRock-G-7, MA-RedRock-S-7, 

MA-RedRock-S-8, MA-SedN-G-6, 

MA-SedN-S-4 

206-21

To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act, the appropriate level of 

environmental analysis and public involvement will be conducted for any land 

exchange or disposal.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in 

plan component, but 

proposed revised plan 

includes additional direction 

related to this topic.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-A 

206-21

Consider the effects of potential land development on infrastructure (such as 

transportation and sewer); utilities (such as water and power); and adjacent 

National Forest, private lands and other public lands in all land exchange 

proposals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1, FW-LndAdj-G-2 

206-21

Discourage new utility corridors on National Forest lands. When no other 

alternative exists, combine new utilities with existing utility corridors or 

road/trail corridors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-2, FWSpecUse-G-5, FW-SpecUse-G-8 

206-21

Encourage open space designations on private land between private 

development and National Forest lands as a buffer to minimize conflicts 

between residents and other National Forest users.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-D, FWLndAdj-MgtApp-E 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

117

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-21

National Forest parcels less than or equal to 10 acres in size could be 

disposed of under the Small Tracts Act, Townsite Act or General Exchange 

Act to resolve encroachment issues or provide lands needed for public 

purposes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-2, MA-HouseMtnG-7, MA-OakCrk-G-14, MARedRock-G-9, MA-SedN-G-6 

206-21

Encourage local governments and private parties to use such methods as 

deed restrictions, development agreements, joint planning authority and 

master planning to mitigate effects from future land exchanges on the 

community and National Forest.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-A, FWLndAdj-MgtApp-D 

206-21

Encourage local governments or agencies, private landowners and/or other 

appropriate entities (e.g. Nature Conservancy, Trust for Public Land, local 

land trust) to protect the resources and character of National Forest 

surrounding high priority private parcels through methods such as, 

conservation easements, land trust management, deed restrictions, or public 

acquisition.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-B 

206-22

Offer exceptional day-use recreation activities. National Forest camping 

continues to be an important recreation experience, but day use opportunities 

are more abundant.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-6, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-RecAll-G-2, MA-HouseMtn-G-4, MAOakCrk-DC-6, MA-RedRock-DC1, MA-RedRock-DC-2, MARedRock-DC-4, MA-SedNMgtApp-B, MA-SedN-S-2 

206-22

There is a range of nature-based recreation opportunities that provide a wide 

array of benefits by meeting people's needs and preferences while sustaining 

the Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, MAHouseMtn-DC-1, MA-OakCrk-DC3, MA-OakCrk-G-5, MA-OakCrkG-9, MA-RedRock-DC-1, MARedRock-DC-2, MA-RedRockDC-4, MA-SedN-DC-2 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

118

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-22 Appropriate degrees of natural quiet are restored and maintained.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-6, FW-Rec-AllDC-10, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, MAOakCrk-G-11, MA-RedRock-DC6, MA-RedRock-G-3

206-22

Emphasize opportunities for individuals, families or small groups and 

opportunities for experiencing solitude, scenic beauty and natural quiet. 

Recreation opportunities are primarily nature based. Both short and long visits 

are available.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Scenic-DC-1, FWScenic-DC-2, MA-HouseMtn-DC3, MA-HouseMtn-DC-6, MAOakCrk-DC-11, MA-OakCrk-DC4, MA-RedRock-DC-10, MARedRock-DC-2, MA-RedRockDC-7, MA-SedN-DC-3, MA-SedNDC-4 

206-22 Recreation activities and facilities meet visitor needs and are consistent with 

ecological goals and recreational opportunity spectrum (ROS) objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-2, FW-Rec-DevDC-4, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-5, FWRec-Dev-DC-6, FW-Rec-Dev-G-1, 

FW-SpecUse-DC-8, MAHouseMtn-DC-3, MA-OakCrk-DC4, MA-RedRock-DC-7, MA-SedNDC-3 

206-22 Recreation user conflicts are minimal and the recreation experience is healthy 

and safe.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllDC-6, FW-Rec-All-DC-7, FW-RecAll-G-2, FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-A 

206-22 Recreation activities and facilities protect water quality and the aquatic/riparian 

community.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, 

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-2, FW-Rec-DevDC-8, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-9, FWRec-Disp-G-5, MA-OakCrk-G-9 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

119

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-22 Visitors have access to high-quality trail experiences.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-2, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, 

MA-RedRock-DC-6

206-22 Recognize the strong demand for inspirational and contemplative benefits in 

the natural landscape and provide settings that contribute to these benefits.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-1, FW-Rec-AllDC-10, FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FWRec-All-DC-4, MA-HouseMtn-DC3, MA-OakCrk-DC-4, MARedRock-DC-6, MA-RedRockDC-7, MA-SedN-DC-3 

206-22

Manage some places for high levels of visitation and to meet the demands of

day-use activities that emphasize scenic viewing, hiking and experiencing and 

learning about the natural environment and cultural resources. Manage some 

places for an uncrowded setting.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, MA-HouseMtn-DC-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-3, MA-OakCrk-DC4, MA-OakCrk-DC-6, MARedRock-DC-4, MA-RedRockDC-6, MA-RedRock-DC-7, MASedN-DC-3 

206-22

Provide leadership to coordinate recreation and visitor information planning 

among major recreation providers, such as Red Rock State Park, Crescent 

Moon Ranch Recreation Site, the Chamber of Commerce, the City of Sedona, 

Big Park Coordinating Council and the Cultural Park.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-MgtApp-C, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-D, MA-OakCrkMgtApp-E, MA-OakCrk-MgtAppG, MA-RedRock-MgtApp-C, MASedN-MgtApp-B 

206-22 Increase opportunities for Semi-primitive and Primitive ROS experiences to 

better meet the high demand for this type of recreation setting.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, MA-HouseMtnDC-3, MA-OakCrk-DC-4, MARedRock-DC-1, MA-RedRockDC-2, MA-RedRock-DC-7, MASedN-DC-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

120

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-22 Ensure that most National Forest visitor activities occur at developed sites and 

on trails designed for high levels of use.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-All-G-4, 

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-3 

206-23 Ensure that recreation site fees are reasonable to enable low- and moderateincome families to access recreation in the Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-7 

206-23

Identify a network of roads at various challenge levels for off-highway vehicle 

touring. Focus OHV activity in the Savannah and Schnebly Rim MAs, although 

opportunities may be available in other management areas. Limit this activity 

in the Neighborwoods, Oak Creek Canyon, Transition and Redrock 

Frontcountry MAs, consistent with ROS and resident concerns. Exceptions 

include Casner Powerline Road, Broken Arrow and Soldier Pass four-wheeldrive roads.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFac-S1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-7, MAHouseMtn-DC-2, MA-HouseMtnDC-4, MA-HouseMtn-G-2, MAHouseMtn-G-5, MA-HouseMtn-G6, MA-OakCrk-DC-3, MA-OakCrkG-2, MA-OakCrk-G-6, MARedRock-DC-3, MA-RedRockDC-9, MA-RedRock-G-2, MARedRock-S-2, MA-SedN-DC-2, 

MA-SedN-G-2, MA-SedN-G-5 

206-23

Eliminate, redesign or relocate unneeded or poorly located roads and trails to 

lessen impacts on such resources as cultural sites, soil, water and wildlife and 

to minimize user conflicts.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacG-5, FW-RdsFac-G-6, FWRdsFac-G-7, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-J, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-11, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, FW-RecTrails-G-3, FW-Rec-Trails-G-6 

206-23 Expand opportunities for scenic viewing along roads and trails.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-8, MA-RedRockDC-1, MA-RedRock-DC-5, MARedRock-DC-8 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

121

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-23

Ensure that aircraft operations are conducted so as to eliminate or reduce 

noise impacts on visitors and restore and protect appropriate levels of natural 

quiet.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, MA-OakCrkG-11, MA-RedRock-DC-6, MARedRock-G-3, MA-SedN-G-4, 

SA-Wild-MgtApp-E 

206-23 Protect sensitive archaeological and biological sites by reducing public access 

and informing visitors more thoroughly.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-DC-2, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-3, FW-Hrtg-DC-4, 

FW-Hrtg-G-4, FW-Hrtg-G-6, FWRdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-J, FW-Rec-Trails-G-3

206-23

Reduce the need for and impacts from parking areas and traffic on National 

Forest land by expanding opportunities for biking, ride sharing and alternate 

types of transportation, such as shuttles or other mass transit.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-H, FW-RecAll-MgtApp-A, MA-OakCrk-DC-8, 

MA-OakCrk-G-7 

206-23 Improve National Forest trailheads and develop additional trailheads as 

identified in Appendix B - Trailhead List.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-10, FW-RecTrails-G-1, FW-Rec-Trails-G-2, 

FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-E 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

122

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-23

Consolidate multiple-trail plans that apply to the Sedona/Oak Creek 

Ecosystem into one plan called The Redrock Trail Plan. (Refer to Map 6 - 

Redrock Trail System and Appendix B - Trailhead List) The Plan should: 

 - complement the transportation and other goals of the community and Forest 

Service; 

 - include a variety of non-motorized trails such as: narrow rugged Wilderness 

trails, high-use trails to allow access to popular areas, wide gentle and hardsurfaced ``pathways,'' and a variety of loops and neighborhood links; 

 - disperse users to areas designed to accommodate trail use while protecting 

resources and community values; 

 - offer a variety of opportunities for day trips; 

 - provide effective connections between nearby resorts, residential areas and 

National Forest; 

 - define criteria for National Forest user satisfaction and schedule periodic 

surveys to monitor user satisfaction to minimize impacts on Wilderness 

values; 

 - promote shared trails, not single-use trails; 

 - provide outstanding trail experiences that help people experience the 

diverse environment of the redrock country; and, 

 - locate trails to take people where they want to go.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-B, FWRec-Trails-DC-1, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-10, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-2, FWRec-Trails-DC-3, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-5, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-7, FWRec-Trails-DC-8, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-9, FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-A, 

FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-B, FWRec-Trails-MgtApp-C 

206-24

Some forest sites are a destination for visitors with interest in the spiritual 

landscape, including, but not limited to, locations at Bell Rock, Boynton 

Canyon, Cathedral Rock, Schnebly Hill and Table Top Mesa. Where possible 

provide access to these sites with opportunities for contemplative reflection 

and scenic vistas, and provide access for older people and people with 

disabilities seeking opportunities for regenerative reflection.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-3, FW-Rec-All-G3, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-2, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1 

206-24

Camping and campfires are prohibited in the Neighborwoods, Oak Creek 

Canyon, Redrock Front- country, Gateway, Red Cliff, Dry Creek Basin, 

Special Area and Transition MAs except in designated places.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-G-4, MA-OakCrkS-2, MA-RedRock-G-4, MASedN-S-2

206-24

Limit dispersed camping to locations that protect resources, provide 

neighborhood security and protect the National Forest visitor's quality of 

experience.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-DispDC-1, FW-Rec-Disp-G-5, MAHouseMtn-G-4, MA-OakCrk-S-2, 

MA-RedRock-G-4, MA-SedN-S-2
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

123

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-24

Until such time as monitoring or new information provides improved methods 

to achieve the goal of restoring and protecting natural quiet in the planning 

area, the following actions are recommended. 

 - Prohibit all landing of commercial aircraft on National Forest lands within the 

planning area, except for emergency or management needs. 

 - Adjust the activities of Forest Service permitted hot air balloon companies to 

reduce the impact of their activities on residences and wildlife. 

 - Adjust the operations of Forest Service and management flights of other 

agencies, such as the AG&F, as feasible to reduce noise impacts. 

 - Develop a monitoring program to determine if goals and objectives are 

being met. 

 - Consult with local governments to gain their cooperation in helping to 

ensure that aircraft operations do not adversely affect natural quiet on 

National Forest lands. 

 - Seek assistance from the Sedona Airport Administration to inform pilots 

about ``noise-sensitive'' areas, such as Wilderness, Cathedral Rock and 

Oak Creek Canyon and to request that pilots avoid hovering, circling or 

overflying these areas below 7,500 feet or 2,000 feet AGL, whichever is 

higher. 

 - Work with the Department of Defense to eliminate military air operations 

below 7,500 feet MSL or 2,000 feet above the canyon rim, whichever is 

higher. 

 - Gain cooperation from the aviation community, including air tour operators 

and general aviation pilots, to achieve the restoration and protection of 

natural quiet in the Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem. 

 - Request the FAA to gain pilot compliance with existing flight rules and 

advisories and to determine the need for a Special Federal Aviation 

Regulation (SFAR) or other airspace management plan that achieves the 

restoration and protection of natural quiet in the Sedona/Oak Creek 

Ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-SpecUseS-1, MA-OakCrk-G-11, MARedRock-DC-6, MA-RedRock-G3, MA-SedN-G-4, SA-WildMgtApp-E 

206-25 Close trails and roads where impacts on cultural and biological resources are 

unacceptable.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-RdsFac-DC1, FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-J, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-4, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

124

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-25

Complete ROS assessments for projects on National Forest lands that could 

change recreation settings. Use the ROS as a tool to adjust management and 

protect and restore the recreation experience. Use the matrix on Map 3 - 

Recreation Opportunity Spectrum Objectives as a guide for setting and 

managing encounter levels.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in 

plan component, but 

proposed revised plan 

includes additional direction 

related to this topic.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-SpecUse-DC-8, MAHouseMtn-DC-3, MA-OakCrk-DC4, MA-RedRock-DC-7, MA-SedNDC-3 

206-25 In some areas, such as at Bell Rock, provide more intense management than 

may be generally consistent with ROS objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-DevDC-3, MA-RedRock-DC-7 

206-25

Limit road maintenance and road improvement activities in order to conserve 

Semi-primitive Motorized ROS characteristics. Provide road maintenance 

consistent with MA emphasis/ROS objectives. (Refer to Appendix C - Road 

Maintenance Objectives)

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-4, MA-HouseMtnDC-4, MA-HouseMtn-G-2, MAOakCrk-G-2, MA-RedRock-DC-9, 

MA-RedRock-G-2, MA-SedN-G-2 

206-25

Develop a ``host'' program at designated camping locations to reduce 

resource impacts, encourage proper camping etiquette and provide 

information to National Forest visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-G-1, FWInterpEd-MgtApp-B, FW-InterpEdMgtApp-D, FW-Rec-All-DC-5 

206-26

Discourage large group events in the Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem except in 

suitable developed places, such as Crescent Moon Ranch Recreation Site or 

in the Savannah MA.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-7, FWSpecUse-DC-9, FW-SpecUse-G19
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

125

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-26

Discourage proliferation of unneeded trails by: 

 - providing well-defined trails that encourage people to stay on designated 

routes; 

 - designing trails that provide a reasonable degree of access; and 

 - installing trail markers and defining trail edges; 

 - providing orientation maps; 

 - obliterating social trails that duplicate system trails or cause damage, such 

as erosion or plant loss.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FW-InterpEdG-2, FW-InterpEd-G-3, FW-RecAll-G-8, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FWRec-Trails-DC-11, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-3, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-4, FWRec-Trails-G-1, FW-Rec-Trails-G3, MA-HouseMtn-DC-2, MAOakCrk-DC-3, MA-OakCrk-DC-5, 

MA-OakCrk-DC-9, MA-OakCrk-G4, MA-OakCrk-G-5, MA-RedRockDC-3, MA-SedN-DC-2

206-26 National Forest management activities should demonstrate the concepts of 

reduce, reuse, recycle and reclaim to National Forest visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-G-1, FW-RecAll-DC-5 

206-26 Recreation developments should incorporate universal design features to the 

extent possible, given the terrain and the overall level of development.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-3, FW-Rec-All-G3 

206-26 Implement and use the ``meaningful measures'' system to develop quality 

standards for recreation facilities and user satisfaction.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-1, FW-Rec-DevDC-2, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-5 

206-26

Commercial activities occur during times and in locations consistent with the 

needs of National Forest users and area residents. Commercial activities are 

consistent with Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-G-2, MA-HouseMtn-S-1, 

MA-OakCrk-S-1, MA-RedRock-S4, MA-RedRock-S-5, MARedRock-S-6, MA-SedN-S-1, MASedN-S-3 

206-26 Commercial tours are consistent with each management area's emphasis, 

ROS objectives and community goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-G-17, MA-HouseMtnDC-3, MA-OakCrk-DC-4, MARedRock-DC-7, MA-SedN-DC-3
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

126

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-26

Permitted commercial tour businesses are capable and willing to invest in the 

stewardship of natural resources and the infrastructure of the National Forest 

within which they operate. Permitted commercial tours participate in resource 

protection and monitoring.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-S-2, MA-HouseMtnMgtApp-A, MA-HouseMtnMgtApp-B, MA-OakCrk-MgtAppF, MA-RedRock-MgtApp-A, MARedRock-MgtApp-B, MA-SedNMgtApp-F

206-26

Commercial tours support the Forest Service mission by providing high-quality 

outdoor recreational, educational and interpretive opportunities consistent with 

Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-DC-8, FW-SpecUse-G1, FW-SpecUse-G-16

206-26 Commercial uses are conducted in a way that sustains long-term soil 

productivity, properly functioning ecosystems and riparian functions.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-1, FW-SpecUseG-18, FW-SpecUse-G-3 

206-27

Provide a commercial guide training program. Training should focus on 

National Forest goals and regulations, Leave-No-Trace etiquette and natural 

and cultural history. Training should occur annually or when new guides are 

hired. Collaborate with guides to develop and implement the training program.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-MgtApp-B, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-F, MA-RedRockMgtApp-B, MA-SedN-MgtApp-F 

206-27 Eliminate as soon as feasible existing permitted commercial aircraft landings 

on the National Forest.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-S-1 

206-27

Evaluate new applications for commercial tours based on the willingness and 

ability of the applicant/permittee to meet the vision and goals of the Forest 

Plan. This review will consider overall recreation use rather than focusing on 

commercial tours only.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in 

plan component, but 

proposed revised plan 

includes additional direction 

related to this topic.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-DC-8, FW-SpecUse-G16 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

127

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-27 Adjust the use of commercial tours as a solution to traffic and resource 

impacts.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-1, FW-SpecUseG-16, FW-SpecUse-G-2, MAOakCrk-G-7

206-27 Permitted commercial tours invest in such infrastructure as roads, trails, 

scenic turnouts and signs in areas where they operate.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-S-2 

206-27 Prohibit helicopter landings and takeoffs on National Forest lands except for 

emergencies and rare maintenance support activities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-S-1 

206-27

Limit new commercial tours to activities that have significant demand, promote 

transportation services or public safety, or substantially increase protection of 

cultural or natural resources.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-G-16

206-27

Any new commercial tour services will be solicited by the Forest Service and a 

prospectus process will be used to select new operators. Unsolicited 

proposals will generally be rejected.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-G, FWSpecUse-MgtApp-H 

206-27 Limit travel associated with commercial uses to system roads and trails, or to 

sites designated in an operating plan for such use.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-DC-8 

206-27

Require Forest Service-approved training for permitted commercial guides 

and their employees on such topics as cultural and natural history, site 

etiquette and Forest Service missions and goals for the Sedona/Oak Creek 

Ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-MgtApp-B, MAOakCrk-MgtApp-F, MA-RedRockMgtApp-B, MA-SedN-MgtApp-F 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

128

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-27

Delegate approval authority for Statewide commercial tours for the 

Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem to the Sedona Ranger District. This will ensure 

compatibility with Forest Plan direction and appropriateness of the activity for 

the sensitive Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-A, FWSpecUse-MgtApp-I 

206-28 Removal of commercial National Forest products is by permit at designated 

locations only.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-S-1, MA-OakCrkS-3, MA-RedRock-S-6, MA-SedNS-3

206-28

Apply guidelines for commercial filming that protect National Forest resources 

and recreational uses and benefits. Discourage commercial filming using 

aircraft in all management areas except the Savannah MA and limited places 

in the Gateway MA.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-1, FW-SpecUseG-2, MA-OakCrk-G-11, MARedRock-G-3, MA-SedN-G-4, 

MA-SedN-MgtApp-E, SA-WildMgtApp-E 

206-28 Review and adjust existing commercial tours to meet Forest Plan direction, 

ROS objectives and community goals and to address residential concerns.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-SpecUse-DC-8, FWSpecUse-G-1, FW-SpecUse-G-2, 

MA-HouseMtn-DC-3, MA-OakCrkDC-4, MA-RedRock-DC-7, MASedN-DC-3 

206-28 Commercial tour activities must not allow livestock to access unsuitable range.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Graz-G-4, FW-SpecUse-DC8, FW-SpecUse-G-21

206-28

Encourage commercial tours to use private land for their activities when their 

proposed use is not consistent with National Forest goals and can be 

accommodated on private land.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in 

plan component, but 

proposed revised plan 

includes additional direction 

related to this topic.

FW-SpecUse-G-16
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

129

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-28

Forest Service communication and interpretive messages show respect for 

the diverse backgrounds and needs of visitors. The Forest Service 

communicates accurately and honestly and conveys a land ethic to visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-G-1 

206-28

National Forest visitor information achieves orientation, safety, educational 

and resource protection goals as well as recovery of threatened and 

endangered species. Visitors and residents: 

 - know where to get information about National Forest opportunities and 

regulations; 

 - learn about the cultural and natural features of the Sedona/Oak Creek 

Ecosystem; 

 - understand the role of fire, know how to minimize risk and accept some 

temporary changes in air quality to accommodate prescribed fire activities; 

 - consider potential impacts when choosing recreation activities and know 

how to minimize their impacts; 

 - understand the legal and ethical limitations on their activities and the 

reasons for these restrictions; 

 - know about the unique and sensitive resources in the Sedona/Oak Creek 

Ecosystem and are stewards of these resources; and 

 - are aware of when they are entering or leaving the National Forest.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-MgtApp-D, FW-FireMgtApp-G, FW-InterpEd-DC-1, 

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-3, FW-InterpEd-DC-4, FWInterpEd-DC-7, FW-InterpEd-G-1, 

FW-Rec-All-DC-5, FW-WUIMgtApp-A 

206-29

Collaborate with the community, local governments, agencies, and service 

and volunteer organizations, including the Chamber of Commerce, National 

Park Service and Arizona State Parks, to develop and implement an effective 

visitor information plan.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-MgtApp-A, FWInterpEd-MgtApp-D 

206-29

Coordinate National Forest information disseminated through other sources, 

such as chambers of commerce, resorts, concessionaire fee booths, State 

parks, national monuments and museums, into a consistent and accurate 

message that promotes stewardship.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-MgtApp-A, FWInterpEd-MgtApp-D 

206-29 Develop visitor welcome centers in cooperation with the community, other 

agencies, and private partners.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdG-4, MA-RedRock-DC-5 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

130

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-29 Provide interpretive information at trailheads and designated camping and 

parking areas explaining heritage and Wilderness philosophy and etiquette.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-7, FW-Hrtg-DC-9, 

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-DC-3 

206-29

Provide information for OHV tourists and trail users, including maps and signs 

that provide road and trail information and explain National Forest regulation 

for such activities as OHV travel and camping and trail opportunities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FW-InterpEdDC-5, FW-InterpEd-G-2, FWInterpEd-G-3, FW-RdsFac-G-3, 

FW-Rec-All-G-8 

206-29

Provide interpretation and information for the local community and National 

Forest users regarding wildfire. Make efforts to educate homeowners and 

builders about risk-reduction practices.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-4, FW-Fire-MgtAppF, FW-Fire-MgtApp-G, FW-WUIMgtApp-A 

206-30 Provide orientation information and interpretation at sites that receive high 

levels of visitation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-5, FW-InterpEdG-4 

206-30 At Wilderness access points, provide directional guidance and information on 

minimum impact and archaeological site etiquette.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-9, FW-InterpEd-DC1, FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FWInterpEd-DC-5, FW-InterpEd-G-2, 

SA-Wild-DC-9 

206-30 Use a consistent design style for interpretive and information signs and kiosks, 

allowing for individual site distinctiveness.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-G-1, MA-OakCrkG-1, MA-RedRock-G-1, MASedN-G-1 

206-30 Information should direct visitors to places that can sustain visitor use.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdG-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

131

Amendment 12 – Entire Sedona/Oak Creek Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-30 Information about the location of sensitive, cultural and biological sites is not 

provided to visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-DC-2, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-3, FW-SpecUse-G14

206-30

At selected popular destination sites provide interpretation to encourage 

visitors to protect the natural surroundings and to respect the introspective 

and contemplative experiences of others.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-7, FW-Hrtg-DC-9, 

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-DC-5, FWInterpEd-G-1, FW-InterpEd-G-4, 

FW-Rec-All-DC-5

Management Area 21 – Dry Creek Basin 

Management Area 21 – Dry Creek Basin

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-32 Eliminate vehicle crossings of Dry Creek unless appropriate water quality 

protection measures can be used.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacDC-2, FW-RdsFac-DC-5, FWRdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G-5, 

FW-Rip-Strm-G-2, FW-Rip-StrmMgtApp-A, FW-Soil-G-2, FWWater-G-4

206-32 Protect sensitive plant populations by placing trails and trailheads out of sight 

of sensitive plants, such as Verde Valley sage and Delmaters agave.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-4, FW-RecTrails-G-1 

206-32 People experience a predominantly natural appearing and sounding 

environment away from the main travel-ways.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-2, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-RecAll-DC-6, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-1, 

MA-RedRock-DC-6, MARedRock-DC-7
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

132

Management Area 21 – Dry Creek Basin

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-32

Acquire properties whose development could detract from scenic and 

Wilderness values or impact historical/cultural values, such as Tucker property, 

Tree Farm and Cockscomb.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1 

206-33

If acquisition is not possible and development occurs, establish partnerships 

with owners/developers of isolated parcels, such as Enchantment, Seven 

Canyons, Cockscomb and Tree Farm, to reduce and control the impacts of 

private development on surrounding National Forest land.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-7, FW-LndAdjMgtApp-B 

206-33

Achieve, in general, a Semi-primitive Non-motorized ROS setting away from 

roads and Semi-primitive Motorized along Dry Creek Road. Recognize ROS 

setting inconsistencies expected along Dry Creek Road, at or within half a mile 

of trailheads, where encounters with other people are expected to be high and 

in the areas near private lands, such as Cockscomb/Tree Farm/Long Canyon.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, MA-RedRockDC-7 

206-33

Maintain the Dry Creek Road (FR152) in a rough condition that keeps the 

challenging and narrow character of the roadway but allows access by the 

careful driver in a standard low clearance vehicle. Emphasize trail access, 

picnicking and scenic viewing along the Dry Creek Road.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-G-2 

206-33

Design a campground that provides: 

 - a Semi-primitive camping experience for tent campers with emphasis on a 

quiet, natural, rustic, uncrowded setting; 

 - a jump-off point to the Wilderness; 

 - staging site for day hikes; 

 - camping and trail access for equestrians; and 

- up to 60 campsite

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllMgtApp-A, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-1, 

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-3, FW-Rec-DevDC-4, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-5, MARedRock-DC-6 

206-33

Emphasize non-guided, day-use recreational activities, featuring high quality 

hiking, mountain biking, equestrian use, scenic viewing, contemplation and 

opportunities to experience nature and solitude.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-DC-1, MARedRock-DC-2, MA-RedRockDC-4, MA-RedRock-DC-6 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

133

Management Area 21 – Dry Creek Basin

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-33

Expand non-motorized trail opportunities outside of Wilderness that provide a 

variety of challenge levels with emphasis on moderate to difficult access levels 

as defined in ROS accessibility guidelines.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-DC-2, MARedRock-DC-3 

206-33

Establish a ``hub'' trailhead to: 

 - accommodate a variety of trail users; 

 - centralize access away from sensitive areas; and 

 - provide a trail link with popular trailheads on Dry Creek Road where parking 

cannot be expanded such as Devil's Bridge, Brins Mesa, Secret Canyon and 

Vultee Arch.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-11, FW-Rec-Trails-DC3, MA-RedRock-DC-3 

206-34

Rehabilitate areas that have been damaged by dispersed camping and 

parking. Give priority to Dry Creek, Fay Canyon South, Dry Creek Road, Long 

Canyon and Van Deren Cabin.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-DispDC-3 

206-34 Prohibit camping and recreation fires except in designated areas.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-G-4 

206-34 Develop partnerships with commercial tour operators to maintain the Dry Creek 

Road and to renovate and protect Van Deren Cabin.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-S-2, MA-RedRockMgtApp-A 

206-34 Limit permitted commercial tours to system roads and trails, with most use 

occurring at Van Deren Cabin and on Dry Creek Road and arterial roadways.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-1, FWSpecUse-DC-7, MA-RedRockDC-7 

206-34

Develop a ``gateway'' information facility to orient and inform visitors about the 

recreation opportunities and regulations for the Dry Creek Basin, Savannah 

and Red Cliff MAs. Evaluate this facility to determine if it can be consolidated 

with the area's trailhead ``hub.''

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-5, FW-InterpEd-G-4, MARedRock-DC-5 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

134

Management Area 22 - Gateway 

Management Area 22 - Gateway

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan 

206-35 Visitors are welcomed and oriented to the area.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdG-4, MA-OakCrk-DC-1, MARedRock-DC-5 

206-35 A sense of arrival at a special place that encourages stewardship is conveyed.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-G-1, MA-HouseMtnDC-6, MA-OakCrk-DC-11, MARedRock-DC-10, MA-RedRockDC-8 

206-35 People entering or leaving the redrock landscape enjoy an outstanding scenic 

corridor. 

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-DC-1, SAScenicRds-DC-1, SA-ScenicRdsDC-3

206-35 Provide a high-quality experience for visitors enhanced by unaltered vistas of 

the distant redrock cliffs.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-DC-1, SAScenicRds-DC-3 

206-35

Coordinate with the Arizona Department of Transportation, local governments 

and private land owners to encourage protection of the scenic quality along 

entry highways.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-MgtApp-B, FWScenic-MgtApp-C, MA-HouseMtnDC-3, MA-RedRock-DC-7, MARedRock-G-5, MA-RedRock-G-6 

206-35

Maintain scenic parkway characteristics. Consider scale and alignment in the 

design of roadway improvements. Also consider roadway features such as 

signs, guardrails and landscaping, that contribute to the desired scenic 

character.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-G-3, MARedRock-G-6, SA-ScenicRdsDC-1, SA-ScenicRds-DC-4, SAScenicRds-G-1 

206-35

Roadside facilities are designed and placed to provide safe scenic viewing and 

photo opportunities. They blend with and complement the surrounding 

landscape. Strategically locate and consolidate parking and access areas to 

minimize disturbance and visual clutter associated with signing, parking areas 

and trailheads.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-4, FW-Scenic-DC9, MA-RedRock-DC-1, MARedRock-DC-8, MA-RedRock-G6, SA-ScenicRds-DC-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

135

Management Area 22 - Gateway

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan 

206-35 Base-for-exchange at The Dells (up to 800 acres) is intended to allow for 

acquisition of high-priority private parcels only.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-S-7, MA-RedRockS-8 

206-36

Exchange proposals will consider methods such as development agreements, 

joint planning authority and master planning to mitigate impacts on the 

National Forest and the community.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-A, FWLndAdj-MgtApp-D 

206-36

Manage generally for a Roaded Natural ROS setting. Recognize the 

inconsistencies of the future development of State highways 179 and 89A 

south of Sedona to make them both four-lane highways within five years and 

manage for a Rural ROS setting classification immediately adjacent to the 

roadway.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-DC-3, MA-OakCrkDC-4, MA-RedRock-DC-7, MARedRock-G-5 

206-36 Facilitate alternative forms of transportation, such as shuttle buses and bicycle 

paths.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-E, FWSpecUse-G-16, MA-OakCrk-G-7 

206-36

At Woods Canyon Trailhead: 

 - improve signing and parking for Wilderness access; 

 - discourage casual Wilderness use resulting from roadside parking along the 

highway; 

 - eliminate vehicle access across Jacks Creek; and 

 - restore damaged sites using erosion control and revegetation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-4, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-3, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-4, FWRec-Trails-G-1, SA-Wild-G-7, SAWild-O-1 

206-37

Work with the Arizona Department of Transportation to determine safe 

pullout/facility locations along State highways. Combine these pullouts with 

opportunities for scenic viewing, trail access, interpretation, transit stops and 

other National Forest access.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-MgtApp-B, MARedRock-DC-8, SA-ScenicRdsDC-3, SA-ScenicRds-MgtApp-A 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

136

Management Area 22 - Gateway

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan 

206-37

Locate and design welcome centers to enhance community values and 

provide National Forest visitor parking and orientation. Work toward 

private/public partnerships to accomplish this objective, possibly on National 

Forest lands under appropriate authorization.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdMgtApp-D, MA-OakCrk-DC-1, 

MA-RedRock-DC-5, MARedRock-MgtApp-D 

206-37 Prohibit camping and recreation fires.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-G-4, MA-OakCrkS-2, MA-RedRock-G-4 

206-37 Prohibit commercial tours, except on State Highways 179 and 89A.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-DC-8, FW-SpecUse-G16, MA-RedRock-S-5 

206-37

Provide general area information, especially about roads, trails, camping, 

community services, points of interest and sensitive features of the 

Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem. Visitor information developments should offer 

a ``self-service'' format with little on-site assistance needed. However, on-site 

hosts are encouraged. Do not limit the information to the National Forest only, 

but consider and provide the broad range of information visitors require. Seek 

partnerships to provide this information.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FWInterpEd-DC-4, FW-InterpEd-DC5, FW-InterpEd-G-1, FWInterpEd-G-4, FW-InterpEdMgtApp-D, FW-Rec-All-DC-5 

206-37

Visitors are welcomed and oriented to the Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem and 

are directed to locations that are best suited to the type of activity they are 

seeking.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-3, MA-OakCrk-DC-1, MARedRock-DC-5 

206-37 Interpret Lime Kiln and Chavez Wagon roads and Stage Stop.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-7, FW-Hrtg-G-5, MARedRock-DC-4, MA-RedRockDC-5
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

137

Management Area 23 – Lower Oak Creek 

Management Area 23 – Lower Oak Creek

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-38 Opportunities for non-motorized, uncrowded, dispersed recreation are 

common.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-DC-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-3, MA-HouseMtnG-6 

206-38 Wildlife habitat, water quality and a healthy stream environment are protected.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Water-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-1, MA-HouseMtnDC-1 

206-38

Opportunities are provided for solitude and isolation from sights and sounds of 

human activity across a range of settings from streamside to canyon to mesa 

top.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-3 

206-38

Collaborate with the AG&FD and the USFWS to reintroduce the round-tailed 

chub into Lower Oak Creek if, after a review of the potential habitats, methods 

and economics, it is a viable project.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A 

206-38

A native fish community exists and functions naturally within the lower reaches 

of Oak Creek. There is an appropriate range of spawning, rearing and 

overwintering habitat to support native fish. Increase angler awareness of and 

demand for native fish.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-Strm-DC-2, FW-WFPDC-10, FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFPDC-4, FW-WFP-DC-8, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-I 

206-38

Research is conducted to further define the habitat requirements of the native 

fish community and to identify actions to protect and/or restore habitat 

conditions and increase native fish populations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-6, FW-WFPMgtApp-B 

206-38 Retain elements of prehistoric agricultural landscapes and historic ranching.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

138

Management Area 23 – Lower Oak Creek

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-39

Though close to the City of Sedona and Page Springs, this MA is still relatively 

undeveloped and should be managed for a Semi-primitive Motorized ROS 

setting on the north side of Oak Creek. Manage the south side of the creek for 

a Semi-primitive Non-motorized ROS setting. The expected number of 

encounters on the north side reflects the level of private development and the 

road use from visitors accessing Oak Creek. The south side is non-roaded and 

the expected encounter level is measured in encounters per day rather than 

per hour.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, MA-HouseMtnDC-1, MA-HouseMtn-DC-2, MAHouseMtn-DC-3 

206-39 Provide a network of trails linked to other trail systems and designed for nonmotorized use such as biking, equestrian activity and hiking.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-DC-2 

206-39

Add commercial use trails in the Kachina area to the Redrock Trail System 

where appropriate. Close and rehabilitate unneeded trails and roads in the 

Kachina area. Continue partnerships with equestrian commercial tours and 

volunteer groups to maintain these trails.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-6, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-2, FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-D, 

MA-HouseMtn-DC-2 

206-39 Provide angling opportunities at remote sites and in a natural landscape.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-8, FW-Rec-All-DC-9, FW-RecAll-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, FWWFP-DC-10, MA-HouseMtn-DC-1

206-39 Expand opportunities for wildlife viewing.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-C, FW-WFPDC-10, MA-HouseMtn-DC-1 

206-39 Implement such measures as vehicle barriers to restrict vehicles from driving 

in Oak Creek. Maintain National Forest road access to Elmersville.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G5, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-2, FW-RecDisp-G-1, FW-Rec-Disp-S-1, MAHouseMtn-G-6 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

139

Management Area 23 – Lower Oak Creek

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-39 Provide for dispersed camping that is consistent with protection of riparian 

values.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-3, FW-RecDisp-DC-4, FW-Rec-Disp-G-5, 

MA-HouseMtn-DC-1, MAHouseMtn-G-4 

206-39 Interpret the Molina Homestead.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-7, FW-Hrtg-DC-8, 

FW-Hrtg-G-2, FW-Hrtg-G-5 

Management Area 24 – Neighborwoods 

Management Area 24 - Neighborwoods

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-40 Collaborate with the AG&FD to educate residents about urban wildlife, such 

as deer, snakes, raccoon, skunk, coyotes and javelina.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-SedN-MgtApp-D 

206-40 Provide information about introduced noxious plants and the problems they 

can create for the native Ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-4, FW-InterpEdMgtApp-A, FW-Invas-MgtApp-D 

206-40

Fire management activities are intense and focus on protection of life and 

property. These activities include: 

 - identifying places of high fuel buildup and potential wildfire problems in the 

wildland/urban interface; 

 - providing interpretation and information to residents and National Forest 

users regarding wildfire; 

 - educating homeowners and builders on risk-reducing practices; and 

 - updating the Fire Prevention Strategy to address the risk and hazard in the 

urban interface.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-DC-4, 

FW-Fire-G-1, FW-Fire-MgtApp-D, 

FW-WUI-DC-5, FW-WUI-G-1, 

FW-WUI-MgtApp-A 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

140

Management Area 24 - Neighborwoods

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-40

Base-for-exchange at Chapel of the Holy Cross is intended for church 

acquisition only; base-for-exchange at VOC Golf Course is intended for golf 

course acquisition; base-for-exchange at Brewer Road Ranger Station is 

intended to facilitate a new ranger station and/or welcome center location.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-SedN-S-5 

206-41

Encourage local governments to ensure appropriate trail access on private 

lands through the private land development process. Use the Redrock Trails 

Plan and the Sedona Urban Trails and Pathways Plan as guides for future trail 

planning efforts. (Refer to Map 6 - Redrock Trails Plan)

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-C, MA-SedNDC-2, MA-SedN-MgtApp-A, MASedN-MgtApp-B 

206-41

Manage access at neighborhood National Forest trailheads to discourage 

visitor parking along residential streets and to encourage alternative forms of 

transportation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-F, FW-RecAll-G-4, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-10, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, FW-RecTrails-G-6, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-E, MA-SedN-DC-2 

206-41

Due to the level of adjacent development and the ease of access, manage 

generally for Rural or Roaded Natural ROS settings, except where there are 

remnant pockets of Semiprimitive ROS settings such as in the Soldier Pass 

area. Soldier Pass should be managed as Semi-primitive Motorized. This 

location is less accessible and more primitive than most of the MA. Maintain 

the rough and primitive condition of the four-wheel-drive road in this area.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-RecAll-G-1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-7, MASedN-DC-1, MA-SedN-DC-2, MASedN-DC-3, MA-SedN-G-2, MASedN-MgtApp-B, MA-SedNMgtApp-C

206-41

A system of trails and pathways surrounds the City of Sedona and the Village 

of Oak Creek and provides trail recreation opportunities and a means of nonmotorized travel off busy streets. Design trails and trailheads to: 

 - direct visitors through residential areas and onto National Forest lands in an 

efficient manner with minimal inconvenience for residents and visitors; 

 - provide convenient trail access for residents and visitors; 

 - prevent damage to vegetation and soils; 

 - encourage residents to use designated trails, neighborhood links and 

trailheads and discourage user created paths.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-10, FW-Rec-Trails-DC11, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-4, FWRec-Trails-G-1, FW-Rec-Trails-G3, FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-E, MASedN-DC-1, MA-SedN-DC-2 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

141

Management Area 24 - Neighborwoods

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-41

Expand partnerships with neighborhoods to promote trail and resource 

stewardship and to obtain assistance in trail maintenance and planned trail 

construction.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-C, FWRec-Trails-MgtApp-D, MA-SedNMgtApp-A 

206-41

Collaborate with the AG&FD, The Yavapai and Coconino County Sheriff's and 

City of Sedona Police Department, to develop special hunting and shooting 

regulations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-F, FW-WFPMgtApp-C 

206-41

Restore damaged sites, with priority given to Sedona North Urban Interface, 

Airport Saddle, Soldier Pass, Jordan Road, Broken Arrow, Upper and Lower 

Red Rock Loop Roads, the Sedona Gun Range and Chavez Crossing.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-AllMgtApp-E, MA-SedN-DC-1, MASedN-DC-2, MA-SedN-MgtApp-B, 

MA-SedN-MgtApp-C 

206-42

Work toward private/public partnerships that provide National Forest visitor 

access and orientation facilities, especially trailheads and parking. These 

facilities might be located on National Forest lands under appropriate 

authorization.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-5, FW-RecTrails-MgtApp-D, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-E, MA-RedRock-DC-5 

206-42

Address local neighborhood concerns about the impacts of visitor use on 

residential quality of life. Use such methods as night-time closures, improving 

signs and limiting motorized access and the number of visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-SedN-DC-2, MA-SedNMgtApp-B 

206-42 Camping and recreation fires are prohibited except in designated sites at 

Chavez Group Campground.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-SedN-S-2 

206-42

Modify commercial activities as needed to address resident concerns for 

safety and to minimize disturbance from commercial activities that access 

National Forest lands through neighborhoods.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-2, MA-SedN-G-4, 

MA-SedN-MgtApp-A, MA-SedNMgtApp-B, MA-SedN-MgtApp-E 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

142

Management Area 24 - Neighborwoods

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-42

Work with commercial tours, filming groups and homeowners to resolve user 

and neighborhood safety and quality of life conflicts such as concerns about 

noise, safety and facilities maintenance needs.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-SedN-MgtApp-E 

206-42

Work with partners in the community to encourage residents' stewardship of 

National Forest resources. Volunteer partnerships have high resident 

participation and provide opportunities for exciting stewardship with a strong 

learning component.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-7, FW-RecTrails-MgtApp-D, MA-SedNMgtApp-A, MA-SedN-MgtApp-B 

206-42 Collaborate with Red Rock State Park as a partner in environmental education 

and stewardship.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-MgtApp-D, MARedRock-MgtApp-C, MA-SedNMgtApp-B

Management Area 25 – Red Cliff

Management Area 25 – Red Cliff

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-43 Facilities that provide access to the cliffs or occur near the cliffs should remain 

visually subordinate to cliffs and to the surrounding landscape.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-10, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-K, FW-Rec-Dev-MgtAppE, FW-Scenic-DC-7 

206-43

Maintain or enhance views of the cliffs from the travel corridors through 

various means such as: 

 - acquisition of intervening private properties with emphasis on undeveloped 

parcels; and 

- limiting the use of intervening areas for parking, camping and/or utilities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-DC-1, FW-ScenicDC-8, FW-Scenic-DC-9, MARedRock-DC-1, MA-RedRockDC-10, MA-RedRock-G-6, MARedRock-G-8
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

143

Management Area 25 – Red Cliff

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-43

Develop management strategies for Honanki and Palatki, addressing all facets 

of visitor use. Management strategies should identify the amount and type of 

visitation that is consistent with maintaining a high-quality experience and site 

integrity.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-DC-8, 

FW-Hrtg-G-2, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-P, 

MA-RedRock-G-7 

206-43

Participate in partnerships with American Indians, including but not limited to 

development strategies for management, stabilization, interpretation, 

collection of ethnographic information and involvement with resorts and 

Wilderness programs.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-P, FW-Trbl-DC1, FW-Trbl-MgtApp-A 

206-44 Provide cultural interpretation at Palatki, Honanki and Boynton Canyon.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-12, FW-Hrtg-DC-5, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-7, FW-Hrtg-DC-8, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-9, FW-Hrtg-G-2, FWHrtg-G-5 

206-44 Collaborate with the Nature Conservancy and Archaeological Conservancy to 

protect cultural and biological resources in the vicinity of Hartwell Canyon.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-MgtAppA, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-F, FW-HrtgMgtApp-G 

206-44 Document cliff dwellings and rock art sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-5, FW-Hrtg-DC-6, 

FW-Hrtg-G-1, FW-Hrtg-O-1, FWHrtg-O-2 

206-44 Inventory cultural areas of distinctive prehistoric and historic features (e.g., 

orchards) and recognize their natural and interpretive potential.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-13, FW-Hrtg-DC-5, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-6, FW-Hrtg-DC-7, 

FW-Hrtg-O-1, FW-Hrtg-O-2 

206-44 Prohibit dogs at developed interpretive sites in Honanki and Palatki and in 

Boynton Canyon.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-S-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

144

Management Area 25 – Red Cliff

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-44 Acquire primarily undeveloped private parcels, particularly the Hancock 

Ranch, Woo Ranch and Lincoln Canyon properties.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-S-8 

206-44

If acquisition cannot occur, collaborate with private land owners and county 

governments in the land development process to protect unique resources 

such as scenery, adjacent Wilderness, archaeological values and threatened 

and endangered species habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-B, FWScenic-MgtApp-B, MA-RedRockMgtApp-D 

206-44

Management should be consistent with a Semi-primitive Motorized ROS 

setting in the part of the Management Area west of Red Canyon, allowing for 

specific ROS setting inconsistencies, such as cultural interpretive sites like 

Palatki, the influence of the main road (FR152c) and access to private lands. 

Although the ROS objectives at Palatki and Honanki are the same as those of 

the surrounding MA, the maximum desired number of encounters is three to 

four groups per hour because of the lower capacity of these sites to handle 

visitation without damage to cultural values.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, MA-RedRockDC-7, MA-RedRock-G-7 

206-44

Provide adequate trailhead facilities for hikers and equestrians to serve Loy 

Canyon and Mooney Trails and to serve hikers at Boynton Canyon and Bear 

Mountain trails. Expand loop trails, such as Mooney and Loy Canyon. Work to 

provide more parking, avoid impacts on archaeological sites and reduce 

private land conflicts at the Loy Canyon trailhead and trail.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-10, FW-Rec-Trails-DC11, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-3, FWRec-Trails-G-1, FW-Rec-Trails-O1, MA-RedRock-DC-3 

206-45 Restore damaged sites, with priority given to Boynton Canyon, Honanki, Fay 

Canyon Trailhead, Loy Canyon and Palatki.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-G-3, FW-Rec-All-G-1 

206-45 Prohibit camping and recreation fires.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-G-4 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

145

Management Area 25 – Red Cliff

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in 

Proposed Revised Plan

206-45 Maintain roads in the lowest standard possible consistent with safety and the 

desired primitive recreation experience.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-G-2 

206-45 Discourage the construction of additional trails to limit access to unprotected 

cultural sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-G-4, FWInterpEd-DC-1, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-11, FWRec-Trails-DC-3, FW-Rec-TrailsG-1

206-45

Expand partnerships with commercial tours to protect, enhance, restore and 

monitor Honanki in compliance with Section 106 of the Historic Preservation 

Act and to provide accurate interpretation and site etiquette for visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-11, FW-HrtgMgtApp-O, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-P, 

FW-SpecUse-G-20, MARedRock-MgtApp-B 

206-45 Limit commercial tours at Honanki consistent with site protection and visitor 

experience objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-20

206-45

Expand the level of personal contact between interpreters and visitors at 

cultural interpretive sites. Provide a high level of interpretation and one-on-one 

contact to accomplish the following: 

 - opportunities for interactive learning through protection, documentation and 

restoration projects at archaeological sites; 

 - appropriate access to site etiquette information; 

 - appreciation of archaeological conservation, native cultures and history; and 

 - visitor education about archaeology and historic resources that fully protects 

those resources.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-10, FW-Hrtg-DC-11, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-12, FW-Hrtg-DC-7, 

FW-Hrtg-DC-8, FW-Hrtg-G-5 

206-45 Provide full-time hosts at Honanki, Palatki, Boynton Canyon and other 

significant cultural interpretive sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-8, FW-Hrtg-G-2 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

146

Management Area 26 – Redrock Frontcountry 

Management Area 26 – Redrock Frontcountry

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-46

Rehabilitate locations that have been damaged by off-highway vehicle driving 

and camping with priority given to Broken Arrow, Schnebly Hill, Cathedral 

Rock and Carrol Canyon.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-AllMgtApp-E, MA-RedRock-MgtAppD, MA-SedN-MgtApp-B, MASedN-MgtApp-C

206-46

Facilities that provide access to or occur near the cliffs remain visually 

subordinate to the cliffs and to the surrounding landscape. Maintain or 

enhance views of the cliffs from the travel corridors through various means 

such as: 

- limiting the use of intervening areas for parking, camping and/or utilities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Scenic-DC2, FW-Scenic-DC-7, FW-ScenicDC-8, FW-Scenic-DC-9, MARedRock-DC-10, MA-RedRockDC-8, MA-SedN-DC-4

206-46

Develop transportation improvements such as scenic turnouts to provide 

orientation and information for visitors and to provide first impressions from 

the highways of the redrock landscape. Encourage use of alternative 

transportation such as shuttles and other high-occupancy vehicles.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-F, FWRdsFac-MgtApp-H, FW-SpecUseG-16, MA-RedRock-DC-5, MARedRock-DC-8, SA-ScenicRdsDC-1, SA-ScenicRds-DC-3

206-47 Fire management activities are intense and focus on protection of life and 

property.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, FWWUI-DC-4

206-47

Recreation management is consistent with a variety of ROS settings, 

including: 

 - Semi-primitive Non-motorized between Submarine Rock and the Wilderness 

boundary; 

 - Semi-primitive Motorized for the remainder of the Devil's Dining 

Room/Broken Arrow area; 

 - Semi-primitive Motorized with Roaded Natural inconsistencies (size too 

small and adjacent to Urban or Rural developments) for Scheurman 

Mountain, Carrol Canyon and the Cathedral Rock area; and 

 - Roaded Natural for the remainder of this MA. (Refer to Map 3 - Recreation 

Opportunity Spectrum Objectives)

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, MA-RedRock-DC-7, MARedRock-G-5, MA-SedN-DC-2, 

MA-SedN-DC-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

147

Management Area 26 – Redrock Frontcountry

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-47

In areas away from parking, roadway and staging sites, manage Schnebly Hill 

for Semi-primitive characteristics with no motorized access, while recognizing 

the ROS inconsistencies in existing social encounters and road access. 

Maintain the Semi-primitive character of Schnebly Hill Road with an unpaved 

surface to promote slow to moderate vehicle speeds and the desired 

recreation character. Retain minimum standards for Schnebly Hill road width, 

horizontal and vertical alignment, vegetation clearing, ditch definition and 

surfacing. Discourage improvements to Schnebly Hill Road as an alternative 

commuter route between I-17 and Sedona. The character of development and 

use should remain low-key, unhurried and rustic; auto traffic speed should be 

consistent with this character.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, MA-RedRockDC-10, MA-RedRock-DC-9, MARedRock-G-2, MA-SedN-DC-3 

206-47

Manage Broken Arrow Basin, away from the parking and staging area, for 

Semi-primitive Motorized ROS settings while recognizing the inconsistencies 

in social encounters that can be expected. Manage parking and staging areas 

at Broken Arrow Basin for Roaded Natural ROS settings because of the area's 

high level of use. The level of use on the main four wheel- drive road is higher 

than generally desired for SPM areas, but the physical setting and 

maintenance level of the road should be managed as SPM.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, MA-RedRockDC-10, MA-RedRock-DC-7, MARedRock-G-5 

206-47

Encourage a variety of primarily self-directed, day-use activities emphasizing 

hiking, scenic viewing and learning about the natural and cultural history of the 

Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-DC-1, MARedRock-DC-2, MA-RedRockDC-4

206-48

Collaborate with the AG&FD, The Yavapai and Coconino County Sheriff's and 

City of Sedona Police Department, to develop special hunting and shooting 

regulations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-F, FW-WFPMgtApp-C 

206-48

Facilities should serve large numbers of people at main vista/trail access 

points while conserving the natural environment and providing views of 

outstanding scenery in an atmosphere where the natural environment prevails 

and opportunities exist for quiet and contemplation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-K, FW-RecDev-DC-3, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-4, 

FW-Rec-Dev-G-1, FW-ScenicDC-7, MA-RedRock-DC-4, MARedRock-DC-5, MA-RedRockDC-6
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

148

Management Area 26 – Redrock Frontcountry

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-48

A network of primarily non-motorized trails provides diverse opportunities for 

hikers, OHV recreationists, mountain bikers and equestrians while helping 

protect fragile natural resources and community relationships. Expand 

opportunities for loop hikes that provide access to the landscape and 

opportunities for scenic viewing. Expand access to overlooks and trails for 

persons with disabilities. Provide trail links to uptown Sedona, consistent with 

the Redrock Trail System as identified in this Amendment and with the City of 

Sedona Trails and Urban Pathways Plan. (Refer to Map 6 - Redrock Trails 

System)

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-3, FW-Rec-DevDC-1, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-2, FWRec-Trails-DC-1, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-7, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, FWRec-Trails-O-1, MA-RedRock-DC3, MA-SedN-DC-2 

206-48

On Schnebly Hill Road, develop a trailhead to serve the Margs Draw, Old 

Munds, and Huckaby trails and develop Schnebly Hill Vista as a viewpoint, 

interpretive site and possibly a trailhead.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-3, MA-RedRock-DC-3, 

MA-RedRock-DC-5, MARedRock-MgtApp-D, MA-SedNDC-2, MA-SedN-MgtApp-B

206-48

Provide opportunities for motorists to stop along main roads to view the 

spectacular scenery and experience the redrock country. Orientation, 

information and interpretation opportunities should be available for visitors on 

State Routes 179 and 89A and at popular trailheads.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-5, FW-InterpEd-G-4, MARedRock-DC-8, SA-ScenicRdsDC-1

206-48 At Bell Rock, take special actions so that visitors will have an awareness of, 

and sensitivity to, the Munds Mountain Wilderness.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-MgtApp-B, 

SA-Wild-DC-9

206-48 Camping and recreation fires are prohibited.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-G-4, MA-SedN-S-2 

206-48

Discourage direct Wilderness access from State Highway 179. Limit this 

access to sites at Bell Rock and the Little Horse, Bell Rock Pathway and 

Woods Canyon trailheads.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

SA-Wild-DC-6, SA-Wild-G-1, SAWild-G-7 

206-49 In many locations, site management should be intensive to accommodate very 

high levels of visitation, protect plants and soil and minimize user conflicts.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-AllDC-7, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-RecAll-G-2, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-3, MARedRock-DC-2, MA-RedRockDC-3, MA-RedRock-DC-5, MARedRock-DC-6, MA-RedRockMgtApp-D, MA-SedN-DC-1, MASedN-MgtApp-B
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

149

Management Area 26 – Redrock Frontcountry

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-49

Develop partnerships with commercial tours for maintaining the Schnebly Hill 

Road and other roads and adjacent facilities used for commercial tour 

activities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-S-2, MA-RedRockG-2, MA-SedN-G-2 

206-49 Focus commercial tour activities on the main roadway and vista areas and 

recreation facilities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7 

206-49

Encourage the development of roving and guided interpretive activities in 

areas of high visitor use. Provide interpretation to enhance short-duration dayuse experience with emphasis on natural history.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-6, MA-RedRockDC-4, MA-RedRock-DC-6 

206-49 Manage the area as a gateway into the Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem, 

providing key visitor information.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, MA-RedRockDC-5 

206-49

Provide outstanding interpretive opportunities to increase understanding of 

and appreciation for the Sedona/Oak Creek Ecosystem with emphasis on 

geology and natural history.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, MA-RedRock-DC-1 

Management Area 27 - Savannah 

Management Area 27 - Savannah

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-50 Ecosystem processes such as fire and flood play a natural role.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Eco-DC-2, 

FW-Eco-DC-3, FW-TerrERU-AllDC-2

206-50 Low-density human uses occur, including scenic viewing, OHV touring, 

hunting, wildlife viewing and firewood cutting.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, MA-HouseMtn-DC-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-3

206-50 A wide variety of Semi-primitive motorized and non-motorized trail uses are 

provided.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, MA-HouseMtn-DC-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-2, MA-HouseMtnDC-3, MA-HouseMtn-DC-4, MAHouseMtn-G-2
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

150

Management Area 27 - Savannah

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-50 Acquire certain private parcels to reduce habitat fragmentation and otherwise 

improve antelope and grassland species habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1 

206-50

This MA is characterized by an open vegetation structure. Use prescribed fire 

and other mechanical treatments to improve forage conditions for wildlife, 

particularly birds and antelope. Increase the area occupied by grasses and 

forbs while decreasing the area occupied by shrubs and trees in comparison 

to recent historic levels.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-1, FWTerrERU-All-G-1, FW-TerrERUGrass-DC-1, FW-TerrERU-GrassMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-DC-1, FWWFP-G-3

206-50

Where piñon/juniper woodland is maintained in a grassland condition, 

eliminate invading vegetation through mechanical and prescribed fire 

treatments as needed. Consult with AG&FD on the design of these 

treatments. (Refer to Map 7 - Prescribed Fire Project Areas)

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-Grass-DC-1, FWTerrERU-PJ-G-1, FW-TerrERUPJ-MgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtAppA

206-50

Develop conditions that: 

 - provide high-quality habitat for upland game birds and deer; 

 - improve and expand antelope and grassland bird habitat through such 

means as fence, road, fire and human access management; 

 - provide adequate cover/security for animal shelter and foraging; and 

- improve forage conditions for wildlife, particularly quail.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-TerrERUGrass-MgtApp-C, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-DC-6, 

FW-WFP-DC-8, FW-WFP-G-3, 

FW-WFP-G-5, FW-WFP-G-6, FWWFP-G-8

206-51 Identify and protect antelope fawning areas.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-Grass-MgtApp-C, 

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-13, 

FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFP-G-5, FWWFP-G-8

206-51

Work together with the AG&FD to develop hunting regulations for antelope 

below the Rim in Game Management Unit 6B to protect and enhance the 

antelope population there.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-C 

206-51

To minimize restriction of antelope movement, locate fences one eighth mile 

from roads if road right-of-way fencing is required. Remove fences that are no 

longer needed; use smooth-bottom wires and meet the wildlife standards as 

stated in FSH 2670 and 2240 for all existing or new fences.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-G-5, FW-WFP-G-6 

206-51 Locate roads to maintain adequate cover for animal shelter and foraging 

between roads, especially in locations with high road densities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-G-5 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

151

Management Area 27 - Savannah

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-51

Use commercial and personal use firewood sales and Christmas tree cutting 

areas to reduce encroachment of invasive tree species and maintain open 

grassland habitat for antelope.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-2, 

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-FprodMgtApp-A, FW-Fprod-MgtApp-B, 

FW-Invas-G-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

MA-HouseMtn-S-1

206-51 Low-intensity fire is acceptable unless life and property are threatened. Lowintensity prescribed burns are desired.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-TerrERUGrass-DC-2

206-51 There are few roads in the House Mountain area. Existing roads are primitive, 

with only native surfacing and no road prism development.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-HouseMtn-DC-4, MAHouseMtn-DC-5, MA-HouseMtnG-2

206-51

Visitors see a landscape characterized by uncluttered panoramic vistas of 

scenic features. Reduce miles of road where feasible and locate remaining 

roads so that, except for road junctions, the sight of other roads is rare to the 

traveler.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacDC-2, FW-RdsFac-G-6, FWScenic-DC-1, MA-HouseMtn-DC6, MA-HouseMtn-G-3

206-51

Facilities such as roads and powerlines exist but are not prevalent and are 

subordinate to the natural landscape features, especially when seen from a 

distance greater than a half mile. Minimize evidence of ``administrative 

presence'' to a level consistent with a Semi-primitive ROS setting.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-4, FW-Scenic-DC7, FW-Scenic-DC-8, FW-ScenicDC-9, FW-Scenic-G-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-6

206-51 Survey promontories and major tributaries, including Coffee Creek.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-O-1, FW-Hrtg-O-2 

206-52

Acquire large blocks of undeveloped private property to improve antelope 

habitat and to prevent impacts on National Forest lands from residential and 

associated infrastructure development. Acquire the Bradshaw Ranch property.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1 

206-52

Collaborate with Yavapai County and private property owners for appropriate 

development of the Gray Ranch area that will minimize impacts on National 

Forest lands.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-D, FWScenic-MgtApp-B, MA-HouseMtnMgtApp-C

206-50

Base-for-exchange at The Dells (up to 800 acres) is intended to allow for 

acquisition of high-priority private parcels only. Exchange proposals will 

consider methods such as development agreements, joint planning authority 

and master planning to mitigate impacts on the National Forest and the 

community.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-A, FWLndAdj-MgtApp-D, MAHouseMtn-S-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

152

Management Area 27 - Savannah

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-52

The Savannah MA is relatively remote and should generally be managed for a 

Semi-primitive Motorized ROS setting. Retain the benefits of quiet and low 

human impact in the northwest portion of House Mountain by managing this 

unroaded area as Semi-primitive Non-motorized. Facilities are few and the 

character of development is rustic and primitive.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-4, MAHouseMtn-DC-1, MA-HouseMtnDC-2, MA-HouseMtn-DC-3, MAHouseMtn-DC-4, MA-HouseMtnDC-5

206-52 Opportunities to experience a natural, uncrowded environment prevail, 

including opportunities to experience solitude and natural quiet.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, MA-HouseMtn-DC-3 

206-52 Expand opportunities for viewing wildlife. Enhance outstanding bird-watching 

opportunities through riparian protection measures at Stage Stop.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-8, FW-Rec-AllDC-9, FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-C, 

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-5

206-52

Establish a hub trailhead in the Black Tank area to serve equestrians and 

provide access to Sycamore Canyon, Casner Mountain, Mooney Mountain 

and Loy Canyon. Establish a trailhead to serve recreationists who use the 

Lime Kiln Trail.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-11, FW-Rec-Trails-DC3, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, MAHouseMtn-DC-2

206-52

Create a network of roads and trails to serve OHV, mountain bike and 

equestrian use. Provide loops and connections with trails outside the area. 

Expand spring and fall trail recreation opportunities using existing roadways 

as much as feasible.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-7, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-7, FWRec-Trails-DC-8, FW-Rec-TrailsG-5, MA-HouseMtn-DC-2, MAHouseMtn-DC-4

206-53 Provide recreation opportunities associated with personal firewood gathering 

and mineral collection consistent with management area goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-FProd-G-3, 

FW-Fprod-MgtApp-C, MAHouseMtn-DC-1

206-53 Provide opportunities for dispersed camping and hunting.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-1, FW-RecDisp-DC-3, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-4, 

MA-HouseMtn-DC-1

206-53

Provide a system of OHV recreation routes through the area that offer scenic 

and wildlife viewing, moderately rugged road conditions and dispersed 

camping. Provide route markers, road signs and maps as needed to guide 

people along the routes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-5, FW-Rec-DispDC-4, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-2, FWRec-Trails-DC-6, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-7, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-8, FWRec-Trails-DC-9, MA-HouseMtnDC-2, MA-HouseMtn-DC-4

206-53 Road and trail locations must consider antelope protection goals. Recreation 

goals are subordinate to antelope protection.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacG-1, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-RecTrails-G-1, FW-WFP-G-13, FWWFP-G-3
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

153

Management Area 27 - Savannah

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-53

Use only native surfacing and do not use road prism development for lateral 

roads (off of main access roads) unless increased use and development of 

private property require improvement for resource protection.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, MA-HouseMtnDC-4, MA-HouseMtn-DC-5 

206-53

If the demand can be demonstrated, allow commercial tours to provide 

opportunities for scenic viewing, natural history education, wildlife viewing and 

other activities that are compatible with antelope protection and Savannah MA 

goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-G-16

206-53 Livestock grazing and collection of minerals, firewood and native plants are 

consistent with other Sedona area-wide goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-FProd-G-3, 

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-2 

206-53

Provide a minimum of orientation and interpretation consistent with the ROS 

setting. Information should emphasize visitor orientation, natural history and 

etiquette pertinent to visitor activities in the Savannah MA.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-DC-3 

206-53 Provide information boards (kiosks) at main road junctions with pertinent OHV 

recreation information.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-5, FW-InterpEd-G-4, FW-RecDisp-G-2
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

154

Management Area 28 – Schnebly Rim

Management Area 28 – Schnebly Rim

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-54

Protect key elk, peregrine falcon, turkey and deer winter habitat. Protect 

turkey roosts from recreational activities, especially dispersed camping and 

motor vehicle traffic.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-11, 

FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WFP-G-3, FWWFP-G-6, FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-B, FW-WFPMgtApp-E

206-54 Use prescribed fire to rejuvenate wildlife browse/forage areas.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-WFP-G-3 

206-54 Close access to Schnebly Hill Road during wet periods when heavy tread 

rutting could occur.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-5, FW-RdsFacG-1 

206-54 Restore the rock pit located west of Schnebly Hill Road so that the pit site 

blends in visually with the surrounding natural landscape.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-10, FW-ScenicMgtApp-A, FW-Scenic-MgtApp-B, 

FW-Scenic-O-1, MA-RedRockDC-10

206-54

Discourage use of lateral roads. While visitors are likely to see other visitors 

on the primary access road, they are unlikely to see other visitors on lateral 

roads.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFac-S1, FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-B, FWRec-Disp-S-1, FW-Scenic-DC-2, 

MA-RedRock-DC-10

206-54

Discourage improvements to Schnebly Hill Road as an alternate commuter 

route between Flagstaff and Sedona/Village of Oak Creek in order to maintain 

a more primitive roadway and recreational experience.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-DC-9, MARedRock-G-2 

206-55

Manage, in general, for a Semi-primitive Motorized ROS setting, with seasonal 

closure of the southern portion to motor vehicles, and a Semi-primitive Nonmotorized ROS setting above the Rim and west of the road corridor, between 

the Wilderness and the road. Recognize the relatively high level of use and 

encounter levels along Schnebly Hill Road, but maintain the road character as 

appropriate for the Semiprimitive motorized ROS setting.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, MA-RedRockDC-7 

206-55

Visitor activities should be consistent with and benefit from a Semi-primitive 

ROS character that provides opportunities to experience quiet, solitude and a 

sense of exploration, hunting, hiking, equestrian use, camping, mountain 

biking and off highway vehicle touring.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-6, MA-RedRock-DC-1, MARedRock-DC-3 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

155

Management Area 28 – Schnebly Rim

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-55

Develop an integrated road and trail system that provides nonmotorized and 

motorized access to scenic Rim view points; allows for scenic and wildlife 

viewing opportunities, hunting and camping access; and expands mountain 

biking and equestrian opportunities. Use existing low standard roads to the 

extent possible for this system.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-Rec-DispDC-1, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-4, FWRec-Disp-DC-5, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-2, FWRec-Trails-DC-3, FW-Scenic-DC1, FW-Scenic-DC-8, MARedRock-DC-1, MA-RedRockDC-3, MA-RedRock-DC-8

206-55 Limit recreation activities to locations and times that do not conflict with wildlife 

goals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, 

FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFP-G-8, FWWFP-MgtApp-F

206-55

Restrict camping along Schnebly Hill Road if needed to protect wildlife or 

watershed values. Consider the use of designated camping areas accessed 

from the road and provided with sanitation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-2, FW-RecDisp-DC-3, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-4, 

FW-WFP-G-3, MA-RedRock-G-4

206-55 Provide a minimum of interpretation, education and orientation. Generally limit 

this information to visitor orientation, natural history and etiquette.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-G-1 

206-55 Provide visitor information on FR153 near I-17.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdMgtApp-C 

Management Area 29 - Transition 

Management Area 29 - Transition

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-56 Ecosystem processes such as fire and flood play a natural role.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Eco-DC-2, 

FW-Eco-DC-3, FW-TerrERU-AllDC-2

206-56

Fire has a natural role. Prescribed fire is used to improve wildlife habitat; 

decrease fuel to natural levels; promote grass, forbs and shrub growth in a 

natural mosaic; and rejuvenate wildlife browse/forage.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWTerrERU-All-MgtApp-A
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

156

Management Area 29 - Transition

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-56 Provide winter wildlife and resident habitat primarily for elk but also for whitetailed deer, mule deer and turkey.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-DC-3, 

FW-WFP-DC-8

206-56 An unaltered, natural-appearing landscape predominates.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-DC2, FW-Scenic-G-1, MA-RedRockDC-1, MA-RedRock-DC-10

206-56

Manage for a Semi-primitive ROS setting. This should generally be nonmotorized except along the Casner Powerline Road where motor vehicles are 

allowed and where trailhead access provides parking and orientation to the 

area.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, MA-RedRockDC-2, MA-RedRock-DC-3, MARedRock-DC-6, MA-RedRockDC-7, MA-RedRock-S-2

206-56 Discourage heavy recreational use. Protect quiet, uncrowded characteristics.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, MA-RedRockDC-2, MA-RedRock-DC-6, MARedRock-DC-7

206-56

Except for motor vehicle use along the Casner Powerline Road, management 

and public use is consistent with goals for Wilderness and provides a 

transitional experience. Provide opportunities for Primitive Non-motorized trailoriented activities, including opportunities to enjoy the natural environment, 

quiet and to access Wilderness.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-7, MARedRock-DC-2, MA-RedRockDC-3, MA-RedRock-DC-6, MARedRock-DC-7, MA-RedRock-S2, SA-Wild-DC-1, SA-Wild-DC-6, 

SA-Wild-DC-8, SA-Wild-G-7

206-57

Emphasize foot, bike and horse trail use. De-emphasize motorized use due to 

the effects of noise on the opportunities for solitude and natural quiet and due 

to proximity to Wilderness.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllG-1, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-1, FWRec-Trails-DC-5, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-7, MA-RedRock-DC-3, MARedRock-DC-6

206-57 Provide a trail connection to link Munds Canyon to the Mogollon Rim from Oak 

Creek.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-2, FW-RecTrails-O-1, MA-RedRock-DC-3 

206-57 Design trails to discourage bicycle access into adjacent Wilderness and to 

otherwise minimize impacts on the Wilderness.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

SA-Wild-DC-6, SA-Wild-G-4, SAWild-G-5, SA-Wild-MgtApp-D 

206-57

Allow four-wheel-drive use along the Casner Powerline access road through a 

special use permit system consistent with ROS goals for the Transition MA 

and adjacent Wilderness MA, wildlife objectives and soil protection and where 

such use does not interfere with APS powerline access needs.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-S-2 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

157

Management Area 29 - Transition

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-57

Camping and recreation fires are prohibited in Jacks Canyon Transition MA 

due to the proximity to Neighborwoods. Due to limited space, four-wheel-drive 

groups are not allowed to camp along the Casner Powerline Road between 

the two gates.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-G-4, MA-RedRockS-3 

206-57 Non-motorized ROS settings are the objective except for the Casner 

Powerline Road.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-7, MARedRock-DC-1, MA-RedRockDC-2, MA-RedRock-DC-3, MARedRock-DC-6, MA-RedRockDC-7, MA-RedRock-S-2

206-57 Do not permit commercial tours on the Casner Powerline Road.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-RedRock-S-4 

206-57

Continue to support Wilderness-dependent recreation opportunities, such as 

backpacking, horse packing and hunter guiding, where these activities are 

consistent with resource and WOS/ROS objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-5, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-RecDisp-DC-1, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-5, 

MA-RedRock-DC-2, MARedRock-DC-7

206-57 Commercial tour activities should be limited to trails or sites designated for 

such use.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-8 

Amendment 17 - Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area 

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-62 There is a range of recreational setting opportunities for people to enjoy the 

area’s many scenic and aesthetic qualities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Scenic-DC-1 

206-62 The diversity and quality of recreation opportunities, settings, and experiences 

are within acceptable limits of change to ecosystem stability and condition.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-Rec-All-G-2 

206-62 Evidence of human activities and developments such as roads, trails, and 

facilities, is visually subordinate to the natural-appearing landscape.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-Scenic-DC7 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

158

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-62

Encourage cooperation among community, landowners, other land 

management agencies, and local governments to maintain trails, natural 

scenery, and healthy landscapes in the Urban/Rural Influence Zone.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-D, FW-RecTrails-MgtApp-D, FW-ScenicMgtApp-B, FW-WUI-MgtApp-A

206-62

Refer to the Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map for the 

FLEA Area map (Appendix M) for the desired recreation opportunities and 

experiences. This includes an increase in opportunities for Semi-primitive 

Non-motorized and Semi-primitive Motorized ROS experiences to better 

manage the high demand for this type of recreation setting.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllDC-6 

206-62 ROS objectives guide management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-DevDC-5, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-1, FWRec-Disp-G-2, FW-Rec-Trails-DC3

206-62 Manage for social encounters, signing, scenery, and a sense of exploration 

that meets the ROS objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Scenic-DC-1 

206-62 Use ROS objectives to aid in determining appropriate types and numbers of 

individual, groups, outfitter/guides, and special uses.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllDC-6, FW-SpecUse-DC-1 

206-62

Manage recreation use to stay within the capacity for ROS objectives with the 

exception of holiday weekend use levels that may temporarily on a short-term 

basis exceed capacity in some locations, such as the Cinder Hills OHV MA.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllDC-6, FW-Rec-All-G-2 

206-62

Management activities should generally comply with the requirements of the 

adopted ROS classes on the Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum 

map.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-RecAll-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, FWRec-Dev-DC-5, FW-Rec-Disp-DC1, FW-Rec-Disp-G-2, FW-RecTrails-DC-3

206-62 Work towards a complete Scenery Management System (SMS) assessment

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-2 

206-62

Regulations are known and enforced. Visitors are properly informed about 

services, facilities, regulations, and environmental ethics such as “Leave No 

Trace.”

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-3, FW-InterpEd-DC-5, FWInterpEd-MgtApp-B, FW-InterpEdMgtApp-C, FW-RdsFac-G-3, FWRec-Disp-G-1
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

159

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-63

Agencies communicate and work together with local organizations to achieve 

goals. There is ongoing communication among community organizations, 

interest groups, and homeowner associations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-FlagN-MgtApp-B, MAMtElden-MgtApp-B 

206-63

Through a variety of interpretive efforts, people learn about biodiversity, 

ecosystem function, fire ecology, and riparian communities and will be 

motivated to practice careful stewardship.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2 

206-63 Implement and use “meaningful measures” * to manage for dispersed 

recreation and user satisfaction.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-1, FW-Rec-DispDC-1, FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-B 

206-63 Dispersed campsites are maintained to protect forest resources and maintain 

visitor experience.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-DispG-2

206-63

Impacts from dispersed camping do not result in unacceptable environmental 

impacts, interfere with day-use, or pose a threat to residents living next to 

National Forest lands.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-DispDC-4

206-63

Implement the camping objectives outlined in the Objectives for Camping 

map. Emphasize daytime recreation activities in Urban/Rural Influence Zone. 

In portions of the FLEA area, change from general dispersed camping to 

designated dispersed camping only. Implement designated dispersed 

camping areas and any additional areas through subsequent site-specific 

analysis.

Reference to controlling 

authority not repeated in 

plan component, but 

proposed revised plan 

includes additional direction 

related to this topic.

MA-FlagN-DC-1 

206-63

Inventory and monitor dispersed camping sites. This inventory will provide 

information about when sites should be closed and restored. The monitoring 

will provide information to help decide whether or not restored sites should be 

re-opened.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, 

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-4, FW-RecDisp-G-2, FW-Rec-Disp-S-1 

206-63

When designating dispersed camping, consider existing resource damage, 

closeness to riparian communities, degree of use, and ROS objectives. 

Campsites should be identified as candidates for closure, restoration, or 

relocation. Campsites that are identified to remain open will become 

designated campsites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, 

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-3, FW-RecDisp-G-5 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

160

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-64

Techniques for managing designated dispersed campsites include but are not 

limited to the following concepts, depending on site location and level of use. 

 - In general, locate designated dispersed camping sites up to 300 feet off a 

forest road. 

 - Designated campsites are identifiable by a marker, such as a sign or post. 

Some sites may be hardened and access improved. Allow camping within 

50 to 100 feet of the marker on a first-come first-serve basis and once the 

sites are full the user would have to go to another area to camp. Site 

specific environmental analysis may yield a greater or lesser distance. 

 - To protect sensitive natural resources, harden or close high-use recreation 

sites and initiate additional camping and campfire restrictions, depending

on monitoring.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-DispG-2, FW-Rec-Disp-G-5 

206-64 Inform and enforce State regulations for no camping within 1⁄4 mile of open 

water.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FW-InterpEdDC-5, FW-Rec-Disp-G-5, FW-RipAll-G-3

206-64 Commercial activities are consistent with management area emphasis and 

ROS objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-1, FWSpecUse-G-1 

206-64

Commercial activities support Forest Service goals and provide high quality 

outdoor recreation, interpretation, and education activities that complement 

the Forest Service mission.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-8, FWSpecUse-G-1, FW-SpecUse-G-16

206-64

Special-use proposals are consistent with desired conditions. New 

applications for commercial use are approved based on the ability and 

willingness of the applicant to meet the goals of the Forest Plan.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-1, FW-SpecUseG-16

206-64 Manage outfitter/guide use to stay within capacities that meet ROS objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-1, FWSpecUse-DC-8, FW-SpecUse-G17, FW-SpecUse-G-2

206-64 Award new outfitter/guide permits competitively by soliciting 

applications/proposals. In general, reject unsolicited proposals.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-G 

206-64

Make outfitter/guide permits available based on a suitable mix of guided and 

non-guided public capacity. This mix may vary by type of activity and/or 

season of use.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-16, FWSpecUse-G-17

206-64 Determine outfitter/guide service capacity for the FLEA area.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-H 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

161

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-64 Review and adjust existing commercial uses to meet Forest Plan direction and 

ROS objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-1, FWSpecUse-DC-8, FW-SpecUse-G1, FW-SpecUse-G-16, FWSpecUse-G-17

206-65

The table below shows objectives for the number of social encounters within 

each of the ROS settings for Forest Service permitted commercial tour 

operators only. These objectives should apply to commercial tours. 

ROS Setting Social Encounters (All users) 

Roaded Natural No objective 

Semi-primitive Motorized 15 per day 

Semi-primitive Non-motorized 15 per day 

Primitive 6 per day

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-SpecUseDC-1, FW-SpecUse-G-17

206-65

Use-level allocations will range from no allocation within some Primitive and 

Semi-primitive Non-motorized ROS areas to relatively high use allocations 

within some Roaded Natural areas. Other more site-specific resource 

concerns, such as the presence of significant archeological sites, threatened, 

endangered, or sensitive wildlife habitat, and areas with sensitive soils, will 

also influence outfitter/guide allocations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-DC-8, FW-SpecUse-G1 

206-65

Require current and future guiding (except hunting) to occur on Forest Service 

system roads and trails, or on designated routes mapped in an operating plan 

approved through an interdisciplinary analysis. In general, do not allow 

repetitive cross-country routes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-S-1, FW-Rec-Disp-S1, FW-SpecUse-DC-1, FWSpecUse-G-1 

206-65

Generally, do not place additional outfitter/guide activities or group activities in 

the Mt. Elden/Dry Lake Hills Trail System, Pumphouse Wash, Deadman 

Wash, Walnut Canyon from Fisher Point east, any spring or perennial stream 

site, except in support of approved research and/or to improve safety or 

provide site rehabilitation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-6, FWSpecUse-G-15, FW-SpecUse-G16, FW-SpecUse-G-17, FWSpecUse-G-2, FW-SpecUse-G-3, 

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-J, MAMtElden-G-5

206-65 If current outfitter/guides cease operations and the activity is considered to be 

desirable after review, conduct a solicitation process for replacement.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-G, FWSpecUse-MgtApp-H 

206-65

Before permitting outfitter/guides adjacent to National Monuments, contact the 

National Park Service for coordination. Outfitter/guides might also help meet 

the mission of the National Park Service in the National Monuments or on 

adjacent National Forest lands.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-J 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

162

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-66 There are opportunities for environmentally responsible group uses of 

National Forest lands.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-9, FWSpecUse-G-19, FW-SpecUse-O-1 

206-66

Require one portable toilet (or equivalent) to be supplied by permittee for 

every 25 participants that stay overnight and one portable toilet (or equivalent) 

for every 50 people staying for the day in a publicized and/or organized event, 

except for group use sites that have permanent restroom facilities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-3, FWSpecUse-G-1 

206-66

In general, large groups of 74 or less, such as family reunions, weddings, club 

gatherings, occur within ponderosa pine and mixed conifer areas on less than 

40 percent slopes. Avoid placing large group events in riparian and open 

water areas, ponderosa pine and mixed conifer areas greater than 40 percent 

slope, and the interior of mountain meadows unless facilities already exist. 

Direct large groups to pre-determined areas where resource damage is less 

likely to occur.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-7, FWSpecUse-DC-9, FW-SpecUse-G19, FW-SpecUse-O-1 

206-66 Inform and enforce State regulations for no camping within 1⁄4 mile of open 

water.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FW-InterpEdDC-5, FW-Rec-Disp-G-5, FW-RipAll-G-3

206-66

Other more site-specific resource concerns, such as the presence of 

significant archeological sites, threatened, endangered, or sensitive wildlife 

habitat, and areas with sensitive soils, will also influence group use 

allocations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Rec-All-G-1, 

FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-DevDC-7, FW-Soil-DC-1, FWSpecUse-G-19, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-2

206-66 Evaluate sites used by groups and, based on monitoring results, implement 

appropriate group size adjustments.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-SpecUseDC-9, FW-SpecUse-O-1 

206-66

Rock climbing areas are managed and maintained for appropriate experience, 

natural settings, attributes, and conditions, considering ROS objectives, 

wildlife, heritage, and soil and water resources.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllDC-6, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-RecAll-G-2, FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-A, 

FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-B

206-66 Rock climbing opportunities are provided, while protecting sensitive resources 

from unacceptable impacts.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-1, FW-RecDisp-DC-3

206-66 Rock climbing areas are managed in partnership with local rock climbers, 

climbing organizations, and outdoor recreationists.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-A, FW-RecDisp-MgtApp-A, FW-Rec-DispMgtApp-B
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

163

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-67

Complete a management plan specific to rock climbing to tier from the Forest 

Plan. Climbing policy in the Forest Plan may be amended if the development 

of the climbing plan demonstrates the need.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-B 

206-67

The climbing plan will include, but is not limited to: 

 - Existing and new climbing routes 

 - Climbing implementation schedule identifying funding priorities for climbing 

management 

 - Closure measures when needed for threatened, endangered, and sensitive 

(TE&S) plants and animals and cultural resources 

 - Schedules for Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) or other management 

strategies when needed 

- Monitoring

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, 

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, 

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-3, FW-RecDisp-MgtApp-B, FW-WFP-G-8, 

FW-WFP-S-2 

206-67 Develop or realign trails into climbing areas as appropriate to provide for 

public safety and resource protection.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-11, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-3, FWRec-Trails-G-1

206-67

Inventory rock climbing areas to determine their resources, conditions, and 

significance. Upon evaluation, some other sites may receive short-term, longterm, or seasonal closures to climbing to limit disturbance to threatened, 

endangered, or sensitive species. Restrictions will be used on a case-by-case 

basis as determined necessary by wildlife biologists in consultation with U.S. 

Fish and Wildlife Service where appropriate.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-WFP-G-8, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-F, FW-WFP-S2 

206-67

Restrict human activities within approximately one-half (1⁄2) mile of occupied 

peregrine falcon nest sites March 1st through August 15th. The 1⁄2 mile 

protection distance may vary depending on local topography, potential for 

disturbance, and location of important habitat components. Monitor peregrine 

nesting success to determine if restrictions are effective.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-WFP-G-8, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-F 

206-67

Restrict human activities where active raptor nests are located. Species 

potentially impacted include the golden eagle, prairie falcon, Mexican spotted 

owl, and zone-tailed hawk. Protection distance will vary depending on the 

species, local topography, potential for disturbance, and breeding season for 

the species. Raptor surveys will be completed on site specific areas to 

determine protection distance.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-WFP-G-8, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-F, FW-WFP-S2 

206-67

Provide interpretive information and education on climbing ethics, and 

resource protection through the use of brochures, signs, visitor contacts, and 

information stations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FWInterpEd-DC-4, FW-InterpEd-DC6, FW-InterpEd-G-1
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

164

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-67

There are opportunities for a variety of trail experiences and challenges that 

are consistent with protection of sensitive resources, meet the needs of a 

diverse public, emphasize the natural environment, and meet ROS objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-2, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-3, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-1

206-67 Non-motorized and motorized trail opportunities provide a variety of 

challenges and experiences and meet ROS objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-2, FW-RecTrails-DC-3 

206-68 There is a network of trails linked to other trail systems, such as City and 

County trail systems.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, MA-FlagNDC-2, MA-FlagN-O-1 

206-68 The Urban/Rural Influence Zone is actively managed to provide opportunities 

and lessen environmental impacts.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-4, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-1

206-68 Trailheads are located in popular areas and provide adequate parking, signs, 

restroom facilities, public education, and resource management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllG-2, FW-Rec-All-G-4, FW-RecAll-G-5, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-3, MAMtElden-G-1, MA-Walnut-DC-1

206-68

Discourage proliferation of unneeded trails by 1) public education, 2) providing 

well-defined trails that encourage people to stay on designated routes, 3) 

designing trails that provide a reasonable degree of access, 4) installing trail 

markers and defining trail edges, 5) providing orientation maps, and 6) 

obliterating social trails that duplicate system trails and/or cause resource 

damage.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-3, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FWRec-Trails-DC-11, FW-Rec-TrailsG-1, FW-Rec-Trails-G-3 

206-68 Relocate existing trails as necessary to protect resources.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-G-1 

206-68

For areas outside of the Urban/Rural Influence Zone, develop a primary 

system of trails and obliterate all trails outside of the primary system. New 

unplanned trails are also obliterated if they occur.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-G-3, FW-Rec-Trails-O-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

165

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-68

For areas within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone, create a primary trail system 

that serves as a collector for trails that originate in neighborhoods. In areas 

outside of the primary system, evaluate user-created (social) trail systems 

based on a checklist of criteria and in coordination with the nearby community. 

The criteria are similar to those listed for road management. Meet interested 

people around Flagstaff to develop site-specific trail plans. Focus trail planning 

first in areas with resource concerns, where high user conflicts occur, or in 

conjunction with other resource management activities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-G-1, FW-Rec-Trails-G-3, 

FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-C, MAFlagN-DC-2 

206-68

Connect Forest Service trails to community access points, and use existing 

social trails where they make sense. Forest Service trail access points must 

be accessible by the public, which means no exclusive neighborhood 

entryways. Work with planning and zoning and developers while building 

plans are still under development. Some trails may provide special needs 

access.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-3, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-2, FWRec-Trails-MgtApp-F, MA-FlagNDC-2 

206-68

Where social trails occur within Mexican spotted owl Protected Activity 

Centers (MSO PACs), delineate a system trail that provides for recreation use 

and lessens impacts to MSOs. Close and re-vegetate non-system trails in 

PACs not used for the designated trail.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, FW-RecTrails-G-3, FW-WFP-G-3 

206-68 Provide information and education about the shift in emphasis to more active 

trail management within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FW-InterpEdG-2, FW-InterpEd-G-3 

206-69

Inventory both Forest Service system trails and non-system trails and identify 

their desired maintenance levels. Track both motorized and non-motorized 

trail routes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-3 

206-69 Use the ROS Objectives to match trail experiences with ROS objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-3 

206-69 Develop or realign trails accessing climbing locations to well-engineered 

design that maintains resources.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-TrailsG-1 

206-69

Coordinate with State, County, and communities park departments to connect 

Forest trails with parks and green-belt corridors, when it is mutually beneficial, 

provides better public service and development is compatible with other 

resource management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-C, FWRec-Trails-MgtApp-E 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

166

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-69

Outside of the Cinder Hills OHV area, motorized trails provide semi-primitive 

motorized experiences with connections to long distance opportunities. There 

are connections from communities to the secondary road system where 

feasible. Where community access is lacking, there are areas to trailer OHVs 

and park.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-10, FW-RecTrails-DC-7, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-8, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-6 

206-69 Identify some motorized trail routes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-S-1, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-6, FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-C 

206-69

Motorized trail opportunities provide long distance connections and meet ROS 

objectives. Evaluate trails based on the criteria for roads, access, recreation 

opportunity, and public input.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-3, FW-RecTrails-DC-8, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-C

206-69

Convert some roads that are not needed for the road system into motorized 

trails and decrease to a width suitable for ATV’s. Motorized trails will promote 

Semi-primitive Motorized experiences for individuals and small groups. Allow 

large group events or races on a case-by-case basis. Motorized trails are well 

engineered to avoid impacts. Some level II roads (high clearance vehicle use) 

may be used for portions of motorized trail routes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-3, FW-RecTrails-DC-7, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-5, FWSpecUse-DC-8 

206-69

Where possible, within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone, provide pass through 

corridors for vehicles and ATV/motorcycles that lead to separate motorized 

trails or to the secondary forest road system. Do not provide for unlicensed 

riders on 50-inch trails if the trails only lead them onto roads where it is illegal 

to ride. Coordinate trail locations near communities with local agencies and 

governments.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-3, FW-RecTrails-G-6, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-C, MA-FlagN-DC-5 

206-69

Developments such as roads, trails, camping, day-use sites, and trailheads 

mimic local materials and landscape characteristics to blend with the adjacent 

natural-appearing landscape.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-10, FW-ScenicDC-2, FW-Scenic-DC-7, FWScenic-DC-8

206-70 Management activities, such as thinning and prescribed fire, result over the 

long-term, in alterations that appear natural to most visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-DC10, FW-Scenic-DC-4, FW-ScenicG-1, FW-Scenic-G-2, FW-ScenicG-3, FW-Scenic-G-4

206-70

Provide fast clean-up from management activities and limit short-term visual 

impacts (1 to 3 years), while meeting fire potential reduction needs, design 

thinning for long-term scenic quality adjacent to homes and along major 

highways or near developed recreation sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-4, FW-Scenic-G1, FW-Scenic-G-2, FW-Scenic-G3, FW-WUI-DC-4 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

167

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-70

Consider impacts to viewsheds of the three National Monuments, the Sunset 

Crater Volcano- Wupatki Scenic Loop Road (FR 545) and the Walnut Canyon 

entrance road (FR 622) and coordinate with Park Service personnel when 

designing or approving projects in these viewsheds.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-MgtApp-B 

206-70

State Highways 89A, 89, 180, and Lake Mary Road (FH3) provide a highquality scenic experience. Provide input to ADOT and Coconino County, as 

appropriate, that highway improvements and maintenance should blend with 

existing natural appearing features except when there are safety concerns 

that cannot be mitigated. Provide input to ADOT and Coconino County to 

minimize the relative dominance of these highways to the extent 

possible/practical.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-9, FW-ScenicMgtApp-B, SA-ScenicRds-DC-1, 

SA-ScenicRds-DC-4, SAScenicRds-G-1, SA-ScenicRdsG-3 

206-70 Road conditions and the miles of road should meet ROS objectives as 

displayed on the Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-2, FW-RdsFacG-1, FW-RdsFac-G-4 

206-70 The road system provides ample access and concentrates use on a welldesigned road system, and maintains unroaded areas in between.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacDC-4, FW-RdsFac-S-1 

206-70

Reasons for closure or obliteration may include, but are not limited to, one or 

more of the following criteria: 

 - Soils that are receiving, or are expected to receive, damage to the extent 

that soil productivity is or will be significantly impaired 

 - Slopes exceeding 40 percent where high probability for damage exists 

 - Riparian areas currently threatened or damaged 

 - Meadows likely to be or being damaged 

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacG-1, FW-RdsFac-G-2, FWRdsFac-G-5, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-J, FW-RdsFac-S-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

168

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-71

Reasons for closure or obliteration may include, but are not limited to, one or 

more of the following criteria (continued): 

 - Poorly designed or maintained roads connected or adjacent to stream 

courses where potential for increased runoff and sedimentation is high 

 - Roads within stream courses or wetlands (permanently or intermittently wet) 

reducing hydrologic function 

 - Visual Quality Objectives (VQO) of Preservation, Retention, or Partial 

Retention are jeopardized 

 - Areas of important cultural resource sites vulnerable to damage that are 

being threatened or damaged 

 - Tree plantations less than 10 years old likely to be damaged 

 - Habitat for threatened, endangered, or sensitive species that is threatened 

 - Key wildlife areas being threatened or damaged 

 - Areas important to wildlife reproductions such as fawning or nesting areas, 

where disturbance is causing, or likely to cause, significant stress and 

reduction of reproductive success 

 - Areas within designated municipal watersheds 

 - Areas where user conflict must be resolved to ensure public safety 

 - Areas considered dangerous for winter off-road driving activities 

 - Areas within urban or rural residential influenced zones outside of 

designated motorized routes 

 - Semi-primitive Non-motorized ROS objectives as set through environmental 

analysis. See Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map for the 

FLEA area in Appendix M. 

 - Semi-primitive motorized ROS objectives as set through environmental 

analysis. See Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map for the 

FLEA area in Appendix M 

 - Roads where the level of use or maintenance thereof causes adverse levels 

of noise affecting wildlife or recreational experiences 

 - Areas where the road system modifies the surface and subsurface 

hydrology 

 - Roads, which cause the introduction or spread of exotic plant species, 

insects, diseases, and parasites 

 - Redundant roads 

 - Roads that foster illegal human activities 

 - Roads that contribute to the airborne dust emissions, which result in 

adverse human health concerns 

 - Roads that adversely affect the agency’s direct costs, meaning there are 

more miles than we can afford to maintain 

- Roads that contribute to incidents of high fire starts

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacG-1, FW-RdsFac-G-2, FWRdsFac-G-5, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-J, FW-RdsFac-S-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

169

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-72

Reasons for maintaining roads open may include, but are not limited to one or 

more of the following criteria: 

 - Roads that aid in the Agency’s enforcement of laws and policies 

 - Roads required for access to treatment areas, range improvements, utilities, 

or minerals 

 - Roads that connect large blocks of land in other ownership 

 - Roads that provide access for fire suppression vehicles 

 - Roads that provide access to recreation use sites or areas 

 - Roads that provide access needs for research, inventory, and monitoring 

 - Roads necessary to meet peoples’ needs and values for roads, such as 

Native Americans to gather traditional plants and access to traditional sites 

 - Roads necessary to manage special use sites 

 - Roads necessary to connect public roads 

 - Roads that if closed, would have an adverse impact on communities’ social 

and economic health

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFac-S1, FW-SpecUse-G-12

206-72

Consider manageability as an important criterion when establishing 

boundaries of areas with restrictions and determining which roads will be open 

and maintained.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacDC-5, FW-RdsFac-G-1, FWRdsFac-G-3, FW-RdsFac-S-1, 

FW-Rec-Disp-G-1

206-72 Keep the Pinegrove Seasonal Closure Area closed to vehicle access between 

August 15 and December 31.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-PineBelt-DC-5, MA-PineBeltS-1 

206-72

Conduct obliteration and re-vegetation work as funds become available. When 

choosing areas to conduct road maintenance and obliteration, focus efforts in 

Semi-primitive Motorized and Semi-primitive Non-motorized areas. Of the 

Semi-primitive Motorized and Semi-primitive Non-motorized areas, consider 

the Lake Mary and Oak Creek Watersheds as priorities for water quality 

reasons. Also focus work adjacent to the National Monuments.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-4, FW-RdsFacG-4, FW-RdsFac-G-6, FWRdsFac-MgtApp-A, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-C 

206-72 Habitats support diverse, healthy populations of native plants and animals. A 

natural variety of plant species, age classes, and structures are present.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-3, FW-WFP-DC-4, 

FW-WFP-DC-5

206-72 The impacts of non-native plant and animal species are controlled and the 

introduction and maintenance of undesirable non-natives is discouraged.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-DC-2, 

FW-Invas-G-1, FW-Invas-G-2 

206-72 Threatened, endangered, sensitive, and management indicator species are 

maintained or recovering in the majority of the habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WFP-G-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

170

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-73

Maintain wildlife travelways to help animals travel between summer and winter 

ranges, feeding and nesting areas, maternity areas, and dispersal areas. 

Travelways help ensure genetic mixing necessary for healthy populations.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-6, FW-WFP-G-6 

206-73

Do not identify target threshold stands within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone. 

The allocation of target threshold habitat within the Lake Mary Watershed and 

Shultz Management Areas would better provide for long-term management of 

roost/nest habitat for the Mexican spotted owl. Approximately 26 percent of 

the Shultz Management Area and 11 percent of the Lake Mary Watershed 

should be managed for target-threshold conditions in the future, due to not 

allocating target threshold conditions in the URIZ.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2 

206-73

Within the FLEA area, survey habitat that potentially could be used for 

nesting, roosting, or breeding, and is within 1⁄2 mile of a proposed site-specific 

project boundary.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2 

206-73

In the Urban/Rural Influence Zone, where possible, limit human activities 

within the 30-acre goshawk nest stand during the breeding season. In general 

however, do not curtail human activity such as informal dispersed recreation 

activities within the Post Fledging Family Areas (PFA). Social trails are likely 

to occur within portions of PFA’s in the urban and rural influenced areas. 

Locate Forest Service system trails to avoid nest sites within PFA’s, within the 

Urban/Rural Influence Zone. Emphasize the need to control pets on Forest 

Service system trails through education and enforcement.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-3, FW-InterpEd-DC-4, FWRec-Trails-DC-4, FW-Rec-TrailsG-1, FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WFP-G8, FW-WFP-MgtApp-F 

206-73

Bald eagle winter roosts and perch habitat will be evaluated for long-term 

viability. Silvicultural methods that encourage regeneration and growth of 

desirable trees may be used near roost sites. Groves of trees may be 

maintained to provide screening for roost and perch areas. Silvicultural 

practices will result in the growth of large diameter trees with open crowns in 

multi-layered stands. Prescribed fires to improve and protect roost areas may 

be used with effective protection of large trees and snags.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtApp-A, 

FW-Fprod-DC-2, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FW-WFPDC-2, FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WFP-G3, FW-WFP-G-9 

206-73 Human activities will be managed so that disturbance does not interfere with 

the eagles’ ability to use the site.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-WFP-G-3, 

FW-WFP-G-8, FW-WFP-MgtAppF
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

171

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-73

Seek opportunities to add to our base of knowledge about human disturbance 

to T&E species. This could be a variety of methods that could include but are 

not limited to, monitoring, survey of habitat, survey of recreation uses, or trail 

counters. Consider options to gather information when planning, or 

implementing, or monitoring site-specific projects, or approving special uses or 

outfitter guides. Consider partnership opportunities with organizations or 

agencies to gather information outside of site-specific project planning. A 

variety of methods could be used to gather information including, but not 

limited to, monitoring, survey of habitat, survey of recreation uses, or trail 

counters. Share results and data among resource personnel and line officers 

for consideration in future projects with wildlife biologists and recreation staff 

to incorporate lessons learned into the next project. If analysis shows a need, 

management changes that could include, but are not limited to, relocating 

roads or trails, limiting season of use, designating types of activities, or 

reducing numbers of users could result if analysis shows a need.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-B, FW-WFP-MgtApp-E 

206-74

In the FLEA area there are a few parcels desirable for the Forest Service to 

acquire. If a willing property owner comes forward entertain a land exchange 

or land acquisition. Desirable parcels are a 1⁄4 section of private land in the Dry 

Lake Hills and there are some isolated, undeveloped parcels in the Lake Mary 

Watershed.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-DC-1, FW-LndAdj-G1 

206-74

In addition, there are Arizona State Trust Lands that are desirable to retain as 

natural landscape. Coordinate the identification of these parcels with the city 

and the county planning processes. Look for avenues to purchase if the State 

is a willing seller. Should land exchange authority be granted to the State, 

consider land exchanges as well.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-DC-1, FW-LndAdj-G1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

172

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-74

Lands offered by the United States in a land exchange are tentatively 

classified as base-in-exchange. Currently, the Forest has 21,133 acres 

classified as base-in-exchange. Because local and physical conditions may 

change during the life of this plan, other lands may be considered for 

exchange. They will generally meet one or more of the following criteria:* 

 - Lands needed to meet the needs of expanding communities; 

 - Isolated tracts or scattered parcels that cannot be efficiently managed; 

 - Lands that provide consolidation of the public lands; 

 - Lands that will improve management, benefit specific resources, or increase 

management efficiency; 

 - Lands that are necessary to meet overriding local, regional, and national 

public needs; 

 - Lands within the boundaries of incorporated communities or annexed 

thereto or land within locally approved growth management boundaries; 

 - Review base-in-exchange plans when private land uses change from 

wildland and undeveloped uses towards more intensive uses.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-DC-1, FW-LndAdj-G2 

206-74

If lands do not meet one or more the above criteria they should not be used as 

base-for-exchange lands. Because change occurs over time, re-visit the basefor-exchange criteria and map periodically and make adjustments based on 

new information such as updated City and County plans (examples are the 

Regional Land Use and Transportation Plan, and the Flagstaff Area Open 

Spaces and Greenways Plan). Consult with the Coconino County and City of 

Flagstaff about land adjustment proposals we plan to take forward into NEPA. 

Public input on land exchange occurs at the time a site-specific land exchange 

is proposed.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-2, FW-LndAdjMgtApp-A, FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-C 

206-75 Grass, forbs, and shrubs on the forest floor contribute to biological diversity of 

the ponderosa pine forest.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-TerrERU-PPDC-1, FW-TerrERU-PP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, 

FW-WFP-DC-5

206-75 Fire should continue to play a natural ecological role within the constraints of 

human health and safety.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-2, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-1, 

FW-WUI-DC-2

206-75

The risk of and potential for destructive crown wildfire is reduced, especially in 

the Urban/Rural Influence Zone (U/RIZ) and the Wildland Urban Interface (1U) 

as depicted on the Fire Management Analysis Zones map.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, 

FW-WUI-DC-6 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

173

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-75

Forest product removal (of any kind) is designed to maintain or restore 

ecosystem health and desired conditions. The use of National Forest land 

products, are primarily a means for achieving ecosystem management 

objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-2, 

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-Fprod-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1 

206-75 Reduce crown canopy and ladder fuels where needed to reduce risk of stand 

replacing crown fires.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-3, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, FWWUI-G-1

206-75

Reduce competition between closely spaced trees in some areas, to promote 

future large trees faster and to achieve desired tree sizes and canopy closures 

outlined in the Forest Plan (Mexican spotted owl and northern goshawk 

habitat guidelines). The parameters within which treatments should be 

designed are to be relatively assured that the future forest structure outlined in 

the goshawk guides is not precluded. No single treatment prescription is 

proposed. Examples of possible prescriptions include but are not limited to 

restoration models, uneven age models, even-age shelterwood, understory 

thinning, and prescribed fire.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWTerrERU-All-S-2, FW-TerrERUMC-MCFF-DC-6, FW-TerrERUMC-MCIF-DC-6, FW-TerrERUPP-DC-12, FW-TerrERU-PP-DC8, FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WFP-S-1 

206-75 Reduce competition between closely spaced trees in some areas to promote 

health and resistance to insects and disease.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWTerrERU-All-G-1, FW-TerrERUAll-S-2

206-75 Incorporate measures to control non-native and invasive plants into project 

design.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-G-1 

206-75

Maintain connected patches of denser vegetation that, along with topography, 

provide travel corridors for wildlife to move through the FLEA area. Maintain 

the two corridors that occur in the Urban/Rural Influence Zone. They are in the 

vicinity of A1 Mountain/Fort Valley, Naval Observatory, and along the Rio de 

Flag.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-6, FW-WFP-G-6 

206-75

When designing treatment consider landowner wishes within the 150-foot area 

immediately adjacent to private land. Within the 150-foot area, more trees may 

be left based on landowner input.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-MgtApp-B, FW-WUIDC-1, FW-WUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-G1, FW-WUI-MgtApp-A, MA-FlagNMgtApp-A

206-76 Where appropriate, design projects to accomplish fuels reduction and 

maintenance on cultural resource sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-G-1, FW-Hrtg-G-3, FWWUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-G-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

174

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-76

Within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone, and in the Wildland Urban Interface 

(1U) as depicted on the Fire Management Analysis Zones map, do not apply 

the hiding and thermal cover guideline that requires 30 percent cover within a 

10K Block.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-6, 

FW-WUI-G-1 

206-76

Distribute wildlife cover where needed within the FMAZ 1U without accruing 

unacceptable wildfire threat to nearby neighborhoods. Wherever possible, 

projects should retain cover conditions within wildlife travelways, MSO 

protected activity centers (PAC’s), along canyon rims, and on steeper slopes. 

Projects within the FMAZ 1U, should attempt to retain 15 percent cover within 

a given section.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WUI-DC-10

206-76

Dense stand conditions on steep slopes and within MSO PAC’s contribute to 

the targeted 15 percent cover condition. Cover conditions might exceed 15 

percent per section due to the presence of steeper slopes or MSO PAC’s. In 

the absence of steep slopes or MSO PAC’S site-specific projects could retain 

a maximum of 15 percent cover condition to maintain a wildlife travelway 

through a section. Projects do not have to retain cover conditions of 15 

percent, if a given section poses a high fire hazard to nearby neighborhoods

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2, FWWFP-G-3, FW-WFP-MgtApp-A, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-E, FW-WFP-S1, FW-WUI-G-1 

206-76 The impacts of non-native plant and animal species are controlled and 

introduction of new non-natives is discouraged.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-G-1 

206-76

Refer to and follow the Noxious Weeds Strategic Plan Working Guidelines, 

Coconino, Kaibab and Prescott National Forests when implementing projects 

in for the FLEA area. This strategy lists “best known practices” for non-native 

and invasive plant control. This strategy is twofold: control or remove existing 

plants and take steps to lessen the spread of non-native and invasive weeds. 

This is especially important in the FLEA area, because of the major highways 

and roadways which provide corridors for plants to spread, and because many 

of the non-native and invasive weed species have the opportunity to increase 

after ground disturbing activities such as thinning, prescribed fire, and road 

obliteration

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-G-2 

206-76

Assist in maintaining a database of non-native and invasive plant populations 

in cooperation with the USGS. Much of the FLEA area has yet to be surveyed 

and this should occur as part of project planning and implementation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-MgtApp-A 

206-76

The location and type of species varies over time and place. Some species 

are mentioned in some of the Management Area descriptions, but additional 

species may be present within other Management Areas as well.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

175

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-77

The biological, physical, and human elements of the landscape sustain 

ecological processes, functions, and structures appropriate to the FLEA Area 

ecosystem. Natural disturbance patterns are conserved or restored consistent 

with human health and safety. Natural elements of the landscape are restored 

and protected.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Eco-DC-2, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2 

206-77 Soil function and long-term productivity are sustained so that the soil can 

resist erosion, recycle nutrients, and absorb water.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-DC-2 

206-77

Natural vegetative and fuels composition area restored so as to reduce 

susceptibility to largescale watershed disturbances, such as large catastrophic 

wildfire.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Eco-DC-3, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWWater-G-1, FW-Water-G-2, FWWater-G-4

206-77

The Lake Mary watershed is a high priority for watershed restoration and 

maintenance from an ecological and socio-economical standpoint. Upper and 

Lower Lake Mary are important municipal water sources for the City of 

Flagstaff.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Water-G-2, FW-WaterMgtApp-C, MA-LkMary-DC-1, 

MA-LkMary-G-1, MA-LkMary-G-2 

206-77

Implement actions to ensure that water quality, and timing support domestic 

surface water supply needs. Specific items include: to improve wildlife and 

livestock grazing strategies, provide stream channel stabilization, construct 

proper drainage and perform maintenance on roads, relocate roads from 

meadows and other sensitive areas, obliterate unnecessary roads and 

manage recreation in a way that supports domestic surface water supply 

needs.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-Graz-G-7, FW-Graz-MgtAppA, FW-Graz-MgtApp-B, FWRdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G-2, 

FW-RdsFac-G-5, FW-Rip-Strm-G1, FW-Water-G-1, FW-Water-G-2, 

FW-Water-G-4, MA-LkMary-G-1, 

MA-LkMary-G-2

206-77

Implement actions to restore a natural vegetative and fuels composition, and 

ensure that soil condition objectives are met on a landscape scale to reduce 

susceptibility of large-scale watershed disturbances, such as a large 

catastrophic fire or insect/disease outbreak.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-O-1, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-O-2, FWTerrERU-MC-MCFF-O-3, FWTerrERU-PP-O-1, FW-TerrERUPP-O-2, FW-TerrERU-PP-O-3, 

FW-Water-MgtApp-B, FW-WaterMgtApp-C

206-77 When implementing site-specific projects, choose Best Management Practices 

consistent with municipal values and this plan.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Water-G-4 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

176

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-77

Cooperate with the City of Flagstaff and National Park Service to develop 

study proposals and projects designed to evaluate best management 

practices, reservoir modifications, and/or operational criteria to address the 

objectives of maintaining the quality of the municipal water supply and 

increasing the likelihood of flood flows and improvement of the inner-canyon 

environment in Walnut Canyon National Monument (per the Stipulation 

Between The City of Flagstaff and the United States on Behalf of the National 

Park Service and the Forest Service).

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-LkMary-MgtApp-C 

206-77

Soil condition objectives are met and soil functions are sustained so that the 

soil can readily absorb, store, and transmit water both vertically and 

horizontally, accept, hold and release nutrients, and resist erosion. Soils are 

able to maintain resource values, sustain outputs, and recover from impacts.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-DC-2, 

FW-Soil-DC-3 

206-78

Mountain meadows located with the Lake Mary and Oak Creek Watersheds 

are improved to enhance soil productivity, biological diversity, and help 

maintain downstream water quality. Improvement measures include: stream 

channel stabilization, improved cattle grazing strategy, management of 

wildlife, recreation, and roads within these meadows.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-2, FW-Graz-G-2, 

FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, FW-GrazMgtApp-B, FW-RdsFac-G-1, FWRec-All-G-1, FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, 

FW-Rip-Strm-G-1, FW-Soil-G-1, 

FW-Water-DC-2, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-C

206-78

The rate of water infiltration is increased, thereby minimizing surface runoff, 

reducing on-site sheet, rill and gully erosion, and subsequent sedimentation 

into connecting waters downstream.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Soil-DC-2, 

FW-Soil-O-1 

206-78 Enhance soil organic matter content to improve physical condition and 

increase water infiltration, nutrient cycling, and soil productivity.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-DC-2, 

FW-Soil-G-2, FW-Soil-G-3, FWSoil-O-1

206-78 Vegetative species composition and diversity are increased and the 

distribution and diversity of vegetative ground cover is improved.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-1, FWTerrERU-All-DC-2, FW-TerrERUAll-G-1

206-78 In general, do not locate open roads in meadows.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-2, FW-RdsFacG-5 

206-78 Provide media and public information focused on the importance of meadows 

and proper activities within meadows.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-4 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

177

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-78 Increase and improve vegetative species composition and diversity in the 

surrounding landscapes to diffuse grazing pressure from elk and livestock.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWTerrERU-All-DC-5, FW-TerrERUAll-G-1

206-78 Riparian communities benefit riparian dependent resources and support 

diverse assemblages of aquatic and terrestrial species.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Rip-All-DC3, FW-Rip-All-DC-5 

206-78 Stream channels have adequate and appropriate plant cover to protect stream 

banks and dissipate energy during high flows.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-5, FW-Rip-StrmDC-1 

206-78 Stream flow is adequate to maintain aquatic communities and water sources 

for wildlife.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Rip-All-DC2, FW-Rip-Strm-DC-4, FW-WFPDC-1

206-78 Wildlife viewing is recognized as a form of recreation and opportunity for 

environmental education.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-C, FW-WFPDC-10

206-78

Emphasis is placed on rehabilitation of high elevation riparian communities. 

Rehabilitation may include: wildlife and livestock grazing management, 

fencing, stream channel stabilization, road relocation, recreation management, 

and physical protection of revegetation work.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-Graz-G-4, FWRdsFac-G-5, FW-Rec-All-G-1, 

FW-Rip-All-G-1, FW-Rip-All-G-2, 

FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, FW-Rip-StrmG-1, FW-WFP-MgtApp-A

206-78 Ensure that riparian areas are in a condition that improves or maintains high 

quality water in the Lake Mary and Oak Creek watersheds.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-4, FW-WaterMgtApp-C, MA-LkMary-MgtAppA, MA-LkMary-MgtApp-B, MALkMary-MgtApp-C

206-79

Follow the trail planning parameters set forth in the FLEA area-wide 

Guidelines. In addition, develop trails strategy that allows for water access 

while protecting the riparian community, wildlife habitat, and sensitive plants. 

At certain locations provide wildlife viewing compatible with wildlife habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-8, FW-Rec-AllMgtApp-C, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, 

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-4, FW-RecTrails-G-1

206-79

Reduce impacts on water quality by such methods as placing toilets in 

strategic locations, and providing information about proper sanitation 

practices.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-Rec-AllG-1, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-2, FW-RecDev-DC-3, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-3

206-79 Follow FLEA area-wide criteria related to roads in riparian and open water 

areas.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G-5 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

178

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-79

Consider restricting general firewood gathering for personal use in the 

Urban/Rural Influence Zone if such use is causing conflicts with other uses, or 

detracting from road management goals. However, designated firewood 

cutting areas may be provided under a managed setting as a tool for various 

objectives, such as removing slash generated by thinning and improving 

herbaceous understory.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-G-1, 

FW-Fprod-G-2 

206-79

Update the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the National Park 

Service and the Coconino National Forest. The MOU sets up 1) how the 

agencies communicate when situations arise, and 2) what criteria will be used 

to make decisions together. The current MOU is for Sunset Crater Volcano 

National Monument and Wupatki. The updated MOU should cover these 

Monuments and also include Walnut Canyon National Monument. For the 

Flagstaff Area National Monuments some of the items that need to be added 

to the MOU include considerations for: Native American access for traditional 

uses, law enforcement cooperation, personal use plant gathering, 

outfitter/guide parameters, commercial filming parameters, boundary 

management, fire management, location and management of NPS facilities on 

Coconino NF lands, National Historic Preservations Act (Section 106), 

National Environmental Policy Act and Endangered Species Act compliance 

coordination, shared services for monitoring, and cooperative efforts in 

managing interpretation and visitor services.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-MgtApp-C, MAPntdDsrt-MgtApp-A, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-A, MA-WalnutMgtApp-A 

206-79

Continue coordination related to fire suppression and fire risk reduction. 

Continue collaborative efforts to control non-native and invasive plants. Stay 

alert to changes in land use status. Provide input to the design requirement of 

new developments (especially when they are adjacent to National Forest), 

participate as a government liaison in the City of Flagstaff’s Open Space 

Coalition, continue linking City and County trails to Forest Service trails, share 

public outreach and education tools, and share information about future plans.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-MgtApp-D, FW-InvasMgtApp-C, FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-D, 

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-E, FW-RecAll-MgtApp-A, FW-Rec-Trails-DC1, FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-C, FWRec-Trails-MgtApp-D 

206-80 Consider ongoing research in project design both to avoid impacts to research 

plots and to gain knowledge provided by research results.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-D, FWSpecUse-MgtApp-E 

206-80 Refer research proposals to appropriate areas based on FLEA area 

objectives.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-1, FW-SpecUseG-15, FW-SpecUse-G-2, FWSpecUse-MgtApp-E
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

179

Amendment 17 – Flagstaff-Lake Mary Planning Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-80

Many different government agencies, individuals, and groups partner with the 

Forest Service to accomplish various projects on-the-ground. These projects 

usually result in long-term improvements for wildlife habitat, recreation, or 

forest health. Continue these activities that have resulted in site-specific 

actions such as, but not limited to, riparian area improvements, wildlife waters, 

forest restoration, and trail building.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-A, FW-HrtgMgtApp-F, FW-Rec-All-MgtApp-A, 

FW-Rec-Dev-MgtApp-D, FW-RecDisp-MgtApp-A, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-D, FW-Rip-Spr-MgtAppA, FW-TerrERU-Grass-MgtApp-A, 

FW-WFP-DC-10, MA-FlagNMgtApp-A, MA-MtElden-MgtAppA

Management Area 31 – Craters Management Area

Craters Management Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-84

Maintain cinder ecosystems, un-tracked appearance of cinder cones, and 

remote recreation opportunities with a high sense of self-exploration. Continue 

opportunities for firewood cutting and livestock grazing in the pinyon/juniper 

woodland. Restore natural grasslands. Re-establish or maintain fire and other 

ecosystem processes in the pinyon/juniper woodland.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-1, FW-EcoDC-2, FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-GrazDC-1, FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FWTerrERU-All-DC-2, MAVolcanWd-DC-1, MA-VolcanWdG-1

206-84

Maintain Semi-primitive Motorized ROS settings throughout the MA, with 

Roaded Natural corridors in between. Provide Semi-primitive Non-motorized 

settings on the large cinder cones.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllDC-6 

206-84 Retain an un-tracked appearance on the large cinder cones and maintain 

plants and animals adapted to the cinder ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-7, FW-BioPhysGeo-MgtApp-H, FW-Eco-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-1, MA-VolcanWdDC-1, MA-VolcanWd-G-1, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-B

206-84 Provide day and overnight-dispersed recreation opportunities with few 

developed trails or facilities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, MA-VolcanWdDC-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

180

Craters Management Area

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-84

As stated in Management Area 10, of the Forest Plan, maintain and improve 

grasslands, including removing encroaching pinyon/juniper and re-introducing 

fire. Maintain or improve watershed conditions throughout the MA.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-TerrERU-AllG-1, FW-TerrERU-Grass-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-PJ-G-1, FWTerrERU-PJ-MgtApp-A, FWWater-DC-3, FW-Water-G-2

206-84 Protect cultural resources.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1 

206-85 Provide low mileage of designated non-motorized trails in the MA and 

encourage self exploration.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-2, FW-RecTrails-DC-5, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-B, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-C, MA-VolcanWd-DC-4

206-85 Consider motorized trail corridors in this MA. Consider routes along the 

secondary road system for multiple-use opportunities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-2, FW-RecTrails-DC-5, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-7, 

MA-VolcanWd-DC-3

206-85

Clear signing and information should be provided to off highway vehicle 

drivers to make clear distinction between driving rules in the Cinder Hills OHV 

area the cinder cones outside of the OHV area.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-5, FW-RdsFacG-3, FW-Rec-Disp-G-1, MAVolcanWd-DC-3

206-85

Continue active monitoring of cultural and historical sites to impacts from 

recreation, cattle grazing, firewood cutting, and other human uses. Changes in 

management can occur in response to demonstrated (through monitoring) 

negative impacts to archaeological resources. Cooperate with available Park 

Service personnel to accomplish monitoring.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-C, FW-HrtgMgtApp-F, MA-VolcanWd-DC-1, 

MA-VolcanWd-G-1, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-A 

206-85

There are known populations of non-native and invasive plants in this MA, 

such as camelthorn. Continue efforts to control or eradicate plants, especially 

along roadways.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-G-1, 

FW-Invas-G-2 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

181

Management Area 32 – Deadman Wash

Management Area 32 – Deadman Wash

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-87

Restore and maintain grasslands and grassland adapted wildlife species, 

especially antelope. Provide large tracts of un-roaded landscape for 

disturbance sensitive species and remote recreation experiences. Protect 

cultural resources. Continue opportunities for livestock grazing, hunting, and 

firewood gathering. Balance recreation use demands on O’Leary Peak with 

sensitive wildlife species needs and Native American cultural values.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Graz-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-DC-1, 

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, MA-VolcanWdDC-2, MA-VolcanWd-DC-4 

206-87

Focus on maintenance and/or improvement of soil condition and watershed

function. System roads and trails should receive adequate maintenance so 

that accelerated soil erosion is minimal. Non-system roads will be rehabilitated 

and some poorly located roads will be re-located. Rate of implementation will 

be dependent on funding and Forest priorities for road maintenance.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G2, FW-RdsFac-G-6, FW-RecTrails-G-1, FW-Soil-G-1, FW-SoilG-2 

206-88

Progress towards the settings displayed on the Objectives for Recreation 

Opportunity Spectrum map. This includes expanding the current Semiprimitive Motorized areas, and adding Semi-primitive Non-motorized settings 

on O’Leary Peak and other large cinder cones. Maintain the Roaded Natural 

settings along passenger car road corridors and the large KV electric line.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4 

206-88

Roads that access the national monuments other than through NPS control 

points will be removed from the system. Other secondary roads that are not 

needed for administrative access will be removed from the system.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-1, FW-RdsFacG-6, FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-C, FWRdsFac-O-1, FW-RdsFac-S-1, 

MA-VolcanWd-DC-3

206-88 Retain an un-tracked appearance on the large cinder cones and maintain 

plants and animals adapted to the cinder ecosystem.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-1, FWBioPhys-Geo-DC-7, FW-BioPhysGeo-MgtApp-H, FW-Eco-DC-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-1, MA-VolcanWdDC-1, MA-VolcanWd-DC-2

206-88

As stated in Management Area 10, maintain and improve grasslands, 

including removing encroaching pinyon/juniper and re-introducing fire. 

Maintain or improve watershed conditions throughout the MA.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-TerrERU-AllG-1, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FWTerrERU-Grass-G-2, FWTerrERU-PJ-G-1, FW-TerrERUPJ-MgtApp-A, FW-Water-DC-3, 

FW-Water-G-2

206-88

Before permitting outfitter/guides adjacent to National Monuments, contact the 

National Park Service for coordination. Outfitter guiding might also help meet 

the mission of the National Park Service in the National Monuments or on 

adjacent National Forest lands

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-J 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

182

Management Area 32 – Deadman Wash

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-89

Continue active monitoring of cultural and historical sites to assess impacts 

from recreation, cattle grazing, firewood cutting, and other human uses. 

Changes in management can occur in response to demonstrated (through 

monitoring) negative impacts to archaeological resources. Cooperate with 

available Park Service personnel to accomplish monitoring.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-MgtAppC, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-F 

206-89

Consider impacts to viewsheds of the National Monuments and consider input 

from Park Service personnel when designing or approving projects in these 

viewsheds.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-G-1, FW-ScenicMgtApp-B, MA-PntdDsrt-MgtAppA, MA-VolcanWd-MgtApp-A

206-89

Green firewood cutting is a tool for grassland restoration. Continue efforts to 

limit illegal firewood gathering and enforce firewood harvest regulations. 

However, if firewood cutting for personal home use causes impacts to 

sensitive areas, adjust firewood policy as needed. This policy is adjusted 

annually for the Forest.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-2, 

FW-Fprod-G-1, FW-Fprod-G-2, 

FW-TerrERU-PJ-G-1, FWTerrERU-PJ-MgtApp-A 

206-89

Take steps to ensure cattle do not concentrate on sensitive cultural sites. 

Techniques to meet this objective include: placing new improvements such as 

water sources and fences away from sites; no salting at these sites; change 

pasture graze period at these sites; and closing parts of pastures to grazing.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Graz-G-2, FW-Graz-G-4, FWGraz-G-5, FW-Graz-MgtApp-A, 

FW-Graz-MgtApp-B 

206-89

There are known populations of non-native and invasive plants in this MA, 

such as camelthorn. Continue efforts to control or eradicate plants, especially 

along roadways.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-G-1, 

FW-Invas-G-2 

206-90

Specific coordination items related to this MA include FR 545, Bonito, and 

O’Leary campgrounds, O’Leary Peak, NPS administrative site, and the 

location of a potential future new visitor center.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-PntdDsrt-MgtApp-A, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-A 

206-90 Coordinate with Sunset Crater Volcano and Wupatki National Monuments in 

managing dispersed recreation use adjacent to the Monuments.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-PntdDsrt-MgtApp-A, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-A 

206-90

Additional topics include fencing placement/removal needs and proposed 

minor administrative boundary adjustments. Coordinate future changes in 

fencing as required by administrative boundary adjustments or to reduce the 

encroachment of users on to NPS national monuments.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-A, FWRdsFac-MgtApp-C, MAVolcanWd-MgtApp-A 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

183

Management Area 33 - Doney 

Management Area 33 - Doney

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-91

Most of this MA is within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone. Reduce the risk of 

catastrophic wildfire, especially within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone. 

Reintroduce fire’s natural role as much as possible. Emphasize daytime 

recreation activities, both motorized and non-motorized. Balance recreation 

demands with protection of soils, water, and vegetation. Maintain public 

access to public lands. Restore natural grasslands, and promote healthy 

pinyon/juniper woodland. Ponderosa pine lands progress towards desired 

forest structure (goshawk habitat). Reduce instances of illegal activities and 

trash dumping. Maintain scenic quality. Opportunities for firewood or other 

forest products are rare, however, firewood sales may be used as a tool for 

management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fprod-DC-1, FW-Rec-All-DC2, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-ScenicDC-1, FW-Scenic-G-1, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-TerrERUPJ-G-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WUIDC-2 

206-92

Per the Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map, expand 

Semiprimitive Non-motorized settings on a few of the large cinder cones in 

this MA. Expand Semi-primitive Motorized settings in other areas and continue 

Roaded Natural corridors along major roads. In this MA, the Semi-primitive 

settings have higher numbers of people than occur in outlying MA’s.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4 

206-92

This MA is a high priority for efforts to reduce the risk of catastrophic fire 

especially in the ponderosa pine lands. Reference FLEA area-wide direction 

and the Forest Plan related to vegetation and fire management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-G-1, FW-TerrERU-AllDC-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, FW-WUIDC-4, FW-WUI-G-1

206-92

Per the area-wide FLEA direction: meet with specific communities and County 

officials and consider input for Forest road and trail management, discourage 

proliferation of unneeded trails, create a primary trail system that serves as a 

collector for trails that originate in neighborhoods, convert some roads that are 

not needed for the road system into motorized trails, and provide pass through 

corridors for vehicles and ATV/motorcycles that leads to a separate motorized 

trails or to the secondary Forest road system.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-MgtApp-A, FW-RecTrails-DC-1, FW-Rec-Trails-DC11, FW-Rec-Trails-G-5, FW-RecTrails-G-6, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-C, FW-Rec-Trails-O-1 

206-92

Before permitting outfitter/guides adjacent to National Monuments, contact the 

National Park Service for coordination. Outfitter guiding might also help meet 

the mission of the National Park Service in the National Monuments or on 

adjacent National Forest lands.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-J 

206-92

When conducting trail planning as described in the FLEA area-wide direction, 

include discussions and input from the Coconino County trails coordinator and 

local groups, as well as community citizens. Complicated access issues and a 

multitude of recreation demands occur here.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-C 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

184

Management Area 33 - Doney

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-93 Balance demands for non-motorized and motorized trails in this MA and 

provide opportunities for both.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-2, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-3, 

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-5, FW-RecTrails-MgtApp-C

206-93 Focus road and trail rehabilitation work on the large cinder cones, in meadows 

and grasslands where impacts are occurring to soils, plants, and cultural sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-BioPhys-Geo-DC-1, FWRdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G-5, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, MAVolcanWd-G-1

206-93

Consider impacts to viewsheds of the National Monuments and consider input 

from Park Service personnel when designing or approving projects in these 

viewsheds.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-G-1, FW-ScenicMgtApp-B, MA-VolcanWdMgtApp-A

206-93 Continue active monitoring of cultural and historical sites to impacts.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-MgtAppC, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-F 

206-93

In the ponderosa pine forests the potential for large fires should be low on flat 

to rolling areas and moderate to high on steep slopes and drainages. In the 

pinyon-juniper forests the potential should continue to be low to moderate. 

Very extreme conditions must exist in order for pinyon-juniper forests to 

support large fires. This area is at high risk for ignition but fire frequency is 

low.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-TerrERU-AllDC-2, FW-TerrERU-PJ-DC-13, 

FW-TerrERU-PJ-DC-3, FWTerrERU-PJ-DC-8, FW-TerrERUPP-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-2 

206-93

Specific coordination items related to this MA include the potential new 

location for a visitor center, coordinated prescribed fire activities, fencing of 

National Monument lands, and illegal access onto the Monument.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-MgtApp-D, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-C, MA-FlagN-MgtApp-B, 

MA-Walnut-MgtApp-A
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

185

Management Area 34 - Flagstaff 

Management Area 34 - Flagstaff

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-95

All of the lands not directly needed by the Forest Service for its facilities 

become low priority for retention in Forest Service ownership. In addition, we 

also are not planning new developments in these areas. As long as these 

lands remain in National Forest ownership, within the Urban/Rural Influence 

Zone (entire MA), reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire, emphasize daytime 

non-motorized recreation opportunities and balance recreation demands with 

protection of the soils, water, wildlife and vegetation, and maintain public 

access to public lands. Reduce instances of illegal activities and trash 

dumping. Maintain scenic quality. Opportunities for firewood or other forest 

products are rare, however, firewood sales may be used as a tool for 

management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-2, FW-Fprod-DC-1, 

FW-LndAdj-G-2, FW-Rec-All-DC2, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Scenic-G1, FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, MAFlagN-DC-1, MA-FlagN-DC-6 

206-95 Emphasize Roaded Natural ROS settings with few roads and trails or facilities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4 

206-95 Continue efforts in partnership with the City of Flagstaff to treat forested 

stands to reduce risk of catastrophic wildfire.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-MgtApp-D, MA-FlagNMgtApp-B 

206-95 These lands are a high priority for treatment of non-native and invasive plants.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-G-1, 

FW-Invas-G-2 

Management Area 35 – Lake Mary Watershed 

Management Area 35 – Lake Mary Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-97

Focus on maintenance and/or improvement of soil condition and watershed 

function. Degraded meadows and stream channels will be improved through a 

variety of management activities designed to increase herbaceous ground 

cover and litter and reduce soil erosion. System roads and trails will receive 

adequate maintenance so that accelerated soil erosion is minimal. Nonsystem roads will be rehabilitated and some poorly located roads will be relocated.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G6, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, FW-RipStrm-G-1, FW-Soil-G-1, FWWater-G-2, FW-Water-MgtApp-C, 

MA-LkMary-G-1, MA-LkMary-G-2, 

MA-LkMary-MgtApp-A, MALkMary-MgtApp-B
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

186

Management Area 35 – Lake Mary Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-98

The northwestern portion of this MA is within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone. 

Reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire, especially within the Urban/Rural 

Influence Zone. Reduce instances of illegal activities and trash dumping. 

Maintain scenic quality. Opportunities for firewood or other forest products are 

rare in the northwest portion; however, firewood sales may be used as a tool 

for management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-1, 

FW-Fprod-G-2, FW-Scenic-G-1, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FW-WUIDC-2, FW-WUI-G-1, MA-LkMaryDC-3, MA-LkMary-G-1, MALkMary-MgtApp-B

206-98

In the entire MA, re-introduce fire’s natural role as much as possible, and 

ponderosa pine lands progress towards desired forest structure, including 

northern goshawk and Mexican spotted owl habitats.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, FWTerrERU-All-G-2, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, 

FW-WUI-G-1

206-98

In the lakes, maintain the variety of waterfowl, raptors, amphibians, and many 

different kinds of plants adapted to lake shore environments. Emphasize 

healthy shorelines adjacent to the water with ample ground cover, and less 

erosion or compaction. Turbidity is natural to these lakes. Minimize human 

disturbance to wildlife, where needed, during the critical times. Continue to 

provide general dispersed and water-based recreation opportunities. Improve 

wildlife viewing opportunities where wildlife viewing is compatible with wildlife 

habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-8, FW-Rec-All-DC-9, FW-RecAll-MgtApp-C, FW-Rip-All-DC-1, 

FW-Rip-All-DC-5, FW-Water-DC2, FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC10, FW-WFP-DC-11, FW-WFPDC-8 

206-98

In the Urban/Rural Influence Zone, per the area-wide FLEA direction: meet 

with specific communities, interested people, City and County officials and 

consider input for Forest road and trail management, discourage proliferation 

of unneeded trails, create a primary trail system that serves as a collector for 

trails that originate in neighborhoods, convert some roads that are not needed 

for the road system into motorized trails.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-6, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-A, FW-Rec-Disp-G-1, 

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-11, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-5, FW-RecTrails-G-6, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-C, FW-Rec-Trails-O-1, 

MA-FlagN-DC-2

206-98

Maintain existing recreation facilities and improve signing, parking, and 

sanitation. Balance recreation demands with sensitive resources such as 

species habitats, fragile riparian vegetation, and erosive soils where they 

occur. Continue to focus high levels of use on the Lake Mary Road side of the 

lakes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-RecAll-G-2, FW-Rec-All-G-4, FWRec-All-G-5, FW-Rec-All-G-8, 

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-2, FW-Rec-DevDC-3, FW-WFP-DC-8

206-98 Riparian communities should have adequate native plant cover to protect 

stream banks and dissipate energy during high flows.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-5, FW-Rip-All-G-2 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

187

Management Area 35 – Lake Mary Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-98

In the Lake Mary Watershed, high priority is given to minimizing soil erosion 

and sedimentation from Forest system roads and trails. Proper maintenance 

and drainage will be emphasized as well as relocation of roads from meadows 

and obliteration of unnecessary roads.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-DC-4, FW-RdsFacG-1, FW-RdsFac-G-2, FWRdsFac-G-5, FW-Rec-Trails-DC4, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, MALkMary-DC-1

206-98

Per the Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map, expand 

Semiprimitive Motorized areas and maintain Roaded Natural corridors along 

major roads. New Semi-primitive Non-motorized patches should be created on 

Mormon Mountain in sensitive species habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4 

206-98 Maintain or enhance rare plant populations where they occur. Examples are 

Flagstaff pennyroyal, Flagstaff penstemon, and Arizona leatherflower.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-8, 

FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WFP-G-3, FWWFP-MgtApp-A, FW-WFPMgtApp-D

206-99

Provide designated parking spots along Lake Mary Road where it borders 

Lower and Upper Lakes Mary. Limit parking to certain spots along the

highway and/or in current paved parking areas. Techniques may include 

installing physical barriers and implementing enforcement policies that 

manage parking.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-5, FW-Rec-All-G4, FW-Rec-All-G-5 

206-99 Provide additional sanitation facilities along the Upper and Lower Lakes Mary 

corridor, especially where large numbers of people tend to congregate.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-3, FW-Rec-DevDC-7, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-3 

206-99 Continue current seasonal motorized restrictions in the Pinegrove Seasonal 

Closure Area.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-LkMary-DC-2, MA-LkMaryDC-4, MA-LkMary-S-1 

206-99

Informational signs and patrols will be similar to what they are today. The 

Forest Recreation Map is the primary information tool. These areas may be 

somewhat "advertised."

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FWInterpEd-DC-4

206-99

Near the lakes continue to provide brochures, signs, and other information 

about the site. In addition, endeavor to improve wildlife viewing and education 

opportunities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-Rec-All-DC-8, FWWFP-DC-10

206-99

Per the Objectives for Camping map, camping is designated dispersed 

camping sites in the Lake Mary and Marshall Lake areas. Continue the current 

developed campground opportunities and continue general dispersed 

camping in the rest of the MA.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-6, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-1, FWRec-Disp-DC-1, FW-Rec-DispDC-4
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

188

Management Area 35 – Lake Mary Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-99

Designated dispersed camping opportunities will be identified along the south 

shore of Upper Lake Mary for boat-in camping. Camping should occur in 

designated sites only on the south shore. Locate designated camping an 

appropriate distance from raptor nests. Sites will be closed, re-opened or 

rotated as needed for area rehabilitation. Foster good sanitation practices and 

encourage boaters to pack-it-out, or if needed design sanitation facilities so as 

not to create sources of human waste pollution.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-S-1, FW-Rec-DevDC-3, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-3, FWRec-Disp-DC-4, FW-Rec-Disp-G2, FW-Rec-Disp-G-5, FW-RecDisp-S-1, FW-WFP-DC-11, FWWFP-G-11

206-100

Do not issue outfitter/guide permits or permit use that causes significant 

change for the ROS social or managerial setting, such as allowing airboats or 

seaplanes on the lakes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-SpecUseDC-1, FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-DC-8, FW-SpecUse-S-1

206-100 Continue the current non-motorized Arizona Trail corridor through the MA.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-S-1, FW-Rec-Disp-S1, SA-NatlTrails-DC-3, SANatlTrails-DC-6, SA-NatlTrails-G3, SA-NatlTrails-G-5, SANatlTrails-G-6, SA-NatlTrails-G-7

206-100

Outside of the Urban/Rural Influence Zone, adoption of user-created trails is 

unlikely. Provide low mileage of designated non-motorized trails in the 

remainder of the MA and encourage self-exploration.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-2, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FWRec-Trails-G-3, FW-Rec-TrailsMgtApp-C, MA-LkMary-DC-2

206-100 Consider motorized trail corridors in this MA. The secondary road system 

should provide for multiple-use opportunities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-S-1, FW-Rec-All-DC2, FW-Rec-Disp-S-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-5, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-7, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-5, FW-RecTrails-MgtApp-C

206-100

Take actions at Marshall Lake to continue use and enjoyment of Marshall 

Lake and to maintain important waterfowl nesting habitat. Continue 

maintenance of the Marshall Lake wetland in cooperation with the Arizona 

Game and Fish Department through such actions as matting, mowing or other

actions that create waterholes in the reeds. Maintain the current boat ramp 

and enhance wildlife viewing opportunities. Consider making a portion of the 

lake and adjacent forested areas, an exclosure that prohibits dogs, people, 

and hunting during the waterfowl-nesting season of May 1 to July 15 to 

increase nesting success of upland game birds.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rip-All-G-2, 

FW-Rip-Wtlnds-DC-1, FW-WFPDC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFPDC-3, FW-WFP-DC-8, FW-WFPG-5, FW-WFP-G-8, FW-WFPMgtApp-A, FW-WFP-MgtApp-D, 

FW-WFP-S-2 

206-100 Refer to more recent management guidelines and conservation assessments 

that exist for bald eagle winter habitat management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-3, FW-WFP-G-2 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

189

Management Area 35 – Lake Mary Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-100 The designated bald eagle/osprey emphasis area should be expanded to 

include future perch and roost trees in key areas.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-PP-G-5, FW-WFPDC-1, FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFPG-2, FW-WFP-G-3

206-100

This area is a high priority for fixing drainage culverts, relocating roads from 

meadows, and obliterating unnecessary roads so that erosion does not 

degrade water quality in Lake Mary.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G5, FW-RdsFac-G-6, FW-WaterMgtApp-C, MA-LkMary-G-2

206-100 Roads, trails, camping, and grazing will be managed to improve watershed 

condition particularly within mountain meadows, springs, and drainages.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, FW-WaterDC-1, FW-Water-DC-3, FWWater-G-2, FW-Water-G-4, MALkMary-DC-1, MA-LkMary-G-1

206-100 Improve watershed conditions in Priest Draw.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Water-G-2, FW-Water-G-4, 

MA-LkMary-G-1 

206-100

Cooperate with the City of Flagstaff and National Park Service to develop 

study proposals and projects designed to evaluate best management 

practices, reservoir modifications, and/or operational criteria to address the 

objectives of maintaining the quality of the municipal water supply and 

increasing the likelihood of flood flows and improvement of the inner-canyon 

environment in Walnut Canyon National Monument (per the Stipulation 

Between The City of Flagstaff and the United States on Behalf of the National 

Park Service and the Forest Service).

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Water-MgtApp-K, MALkMary-MgtApp-A, MA-LkMaryMgtApp-B, MA-LkMary-MgtAppC, MA-Walnut-MgtApp-A 

206-101

Per the FLEA Area-wide direction, reduce potential for catastrophic wildfire 

within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone. Because of prevailing winds, lands 

south and west of the Urban/Rural Influence Zone should be evaluated for 

wildfire risks and appropriate measures taken to reduce potential for 

catastrophic fire. Continue partnerships with city, county, and State fire 

departments to coordinate fire hazard reduction treatments, prevention, and 

suppression. Take steps to minimize wildfire losses to key wildlife habitat 

components such as eagle roosts, osprey nests, snags, yellow pines, oaks 

and rare plant habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-MgtAppD, FW-TerrERU-All-DC-1, FWTerrERU-All-DC-2, FW-WFP-G-9, 

FW-WUI-DC-10, FW-WUI-DC-2, 

FW-WUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4, 

FW-WUI-DC-5, FW-WUI-G-1, 

MA-LkMary-DC-1, MA-LkMary-G1, MA-LkMary-MgtApp-B 

206-101 Follow approved management plans or other conservation documents.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2, FWWFP-MgtApp-A 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

190

Management Area 35 – Lake Mary Watershed

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-101

There are known populations of non-native and invasive plants in this MA, 

such as diffuse and spotted knapweed, musk and bull thistle, and 

Mediterranean sage. Continue efforts to control or eradicate these weeds and 

coordinate with recreation and lands uses to prevent spread.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-DC-2, 

FW-Invas-G-1, FW-Invas-G-2, 

FW-Invas-G-3, FW-RdsFac-G-8, 

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-6, 

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-9, FWSpecUse-G-1, FW-SpecUse-G-21

Management Area 36 - Schultz 

Management Area 36 - Schultz

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-103

A small portion of this MA is within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone. Reduce 

the risk of catastrophic wildfire, especially within the Urban/Rural Influence 

Zone. Reintroduce fire’s natural role as much as possible. Emphasize daytime 

recreation activities, primarily non-motorized in the Urban/Rural Influence 

Zone and provide designated camping sites in the Dry Lake Hills. Balance 

recreation demands with protection of the soils, water, vegetation, and 

sensitive species. This includes defining limits on recreation individual, group 

or outfitter/guide use if analysis shows a need.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-G-1, FW-Fire-G-2, FWRec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, 

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-DispDC-4, FW-Rec-Disp-G-2, FWSpecUse-DC-1, FW-TerrERU-AllDC-2, FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FWWUI-DC-10, FW-WUI-DC-2, FWWUI-DC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4, FWWUI-DC-7, FW-WUI-DC-8 

FW-WUI-DC-9, FW-WUI-G-1, 

MA-MtElden-DC-1, MA-MtEldenDC-2, MA-MtElden-DC-3, MAMtElden-DC-4, MA-MtElden-G-2, 

MA-MtElden-G-5, MA-Peaks-DC2

206-103

Maintain drainages and meadows for watershed health and water quality. 

Ponderosa pine lands progress towards desired forest structure (goshawk 

habitat). Reduce instances of illegal activities and trash dumping. Maintain 

scenic quality. Opportunities for firewood or other forest products are rare; 

however, firewood sales may be used as a tool for management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-1, 

FW-Fprod-G-2, FW-Rec-Disp-DC3, FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-ScenicG-1, FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-1, FW-TerrERUPP-DC-12, FW-TerrERU-PP-DC3, FW-Water-DC-1, FW-WaterDC-2, MA-MtElden-DC-6
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

191

Management Area 36 - Schultz

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-103

In the Mt. Elden/Dry Lake Hills area, people should be mostly on the trail 

system, leaving undisturbed patches of habitat in between. Wildlife habitat will 

be somewhat fragmented because of the extent of the trail system, but 

topography and dense mixed conifer vegetation reduce some of the effects.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, FW-RecTrails-DC-11, FW-Rec-Trails-G-1, 

FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-11, 

FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFP-DC-3, 

FW-WFP-DC-5, FW-WFP-DC-6, 

FW-WFP-G-13, MA-MtElden-DC1

206-103

Per the Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map, maintain the 

Semiprimitive Non-motorized setting in the Dry Lake Hills and expand the 

Semiprimitive Non-motorized setting below the Waterline Road. Expand Semiprimitive Motorized settings in the remainder of the MA with Roaded Natural 

corridors along major roads.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, MA-MtEldenDC-4, MA-MtElden-G-2 

206-104 Maintain the Dry Lake Hills Trail system for non-motorized recreation trail 

opportunities. Few if any additions are needed to this system.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-1, MAMtElden-DC-4, MA-MtElden-G-2 

206-104 Maintain the two Mexican spotted owl PACs.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G-2, FWWFP-G-3, FW-WFP-G-4, FWWFP-S-1

206-104 Identify designated parking spots along the roads of this MA where 

recreational uses are heavy.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-4, FW-Rec-All-G-5, 

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-10

206-104

Maintain the non-motorized status of the base of Mt. Elden to protect deer 

winter habitat and cultural sites and to provide for high levels of non-motorized 

recreation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-MtElden-DC-2, MA-MtEldenDC-4, MA-MtElden-G-2 

206-104 In the Mount Elden/Dry Lake Hills area there will be extensive signing, 

brochures, and patrols so that visitors can easily find trails and facilities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-3, FW-InterpEd-DC-6, FWRec-All-G-8, FW-Rec-Dev-DC-6, 

MA-MtElden-DC-1

206-104

In the area east of the Waterline Road informational signs and patrols will be 

similar to what they are today. Brochures or other information would be 

minimal. Recreation opportunities here will not be "advertised."

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-2, FW-InterpEdDC-3, FW-InterpEd-DC-4, FWRec-All-G-8, MA-MtElden-DC-1

206-104 Per the Objectives for Camping map, designate dispersed camping sites in 

the Mount Elden/Dry Lake Hills area.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-4, FW-RecDisp-G-2, FW-Rec-Disp-S-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

192

Management Area 36 - Schultz

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-105

Per FLEA Area-wide direction, generally, do not place additional outfitter/guide 

activities or group activities in the Dry Lake Hills, any spring or perennial 

stream site, except in support of approved research, and/or to improve safety 

or provide site rehabilitation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-1, FWSpecUse-G-16, FW-SpecUse-G19, FW-SpecUse-G-3 

206-105

Maintain the current trail system. Maintain and improve trailhead parking and 

identify designated parking spots. Relocate trailhead parking on the Elden 

Lookout Road to balance use with sensitive MSO habitat.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-4, 

FW-Rec-All-G-5, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-10, FW-WFP-G-3

206-105 Maintain the Waterline Road as a heavily used non-motorized recreation 

corridor. Administrative use is motorized.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-S-1, MA-MtEldenDC-5, MA-MtElden-G-3, MAPeaks-DC-4, MA-Peaks-G-1

206-105 Do not pursue motorized trails in the Dry Lake Hills or east of the Waterline 

Road.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-MtElden-DC-4 

206-105 Between Timberline and other communities, consider a motorized connection. 

Use the secondary road system to provide motorized access.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-7, FW-RecTrails-DC-8, FW-Rec-Trails-G-5, 

FW-Rec-Trails-G-6

206-105

Within the Semi-primitive Non-motorized ROS settings maintain large tracts of 

unfragmented habitat for disturbance sensitive species, such as turkey and 

bear.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Rec-All-DC-6, FWWFP-DC-1

206-105

Per the FLEA Area-wide direction, reduce potential for catastrophic wildfire 

within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone. Because of prevailing winds and steep 

terrain, lands north and east of the Urban/Rural Influence Zone should be 

evaluated for wildfire risks and appropriate measures taken to reduce potential 

for catastrophic fire. Continue partnerships with City, County, and State fire 

departments to coordinate fire hazard reduction treatments, prevention, and 

suppression.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fire-MgtAppD, FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWWUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, FWWUI-DC-4, FW-WUI-DC-5, FWWUI-G-1, MA-FlagN-MgtApp-A, 

MA-FlagN-MgtApp-B, MAMtElden-MgtApp-A, MA-MtEldenMgtApp-B
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

193

Management Area 37 – Walnut Canyon 

Management Area 37 – Walnut Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-108

Provide Recreational Opportunities. Maintain the quality of the recreational 

experience throughout this MA. North and west of Walnut Canyon emphasize 

daytime recreation activities, primarily non-motorized. South and east of 

Walnut Canyon emphasize remote dispersed recreation (day and overnight) 

with motorized and non-motorized opportunities. Balance recreation demands 

with protection of the soils, water, vegetation, and sensitive species.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-1, FW-Rec-AllDC-2, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-RecAll-DC-6, FW-Rec-All-G-1, MAWalnut-DC-1, MA-Walnut-G-1 

206-108

Manage to protect the values of Walnut Canyon National Monument and 

complement National Park Service goals for the Monument as described in 

the National Park Service’s General Management Plan.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, MA-Walnut-G-2, 

MA-Walnut-MgtApp-A 

206-108 Maintain scenic quality.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-DC2, FW-Scenic-G-1, MA-WalnutDC-2

206-108

Protect the community - A small portion of this MA is within the Urban/Rural 

Influence Zone. Reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire, especially within the 

Urban/Rural Influence Zone. Reintroduce fire’s natural role as much as 

possible. Opportunities for firewood or other forest products are rare north and 

west of the Canyon, however, firewood sales may be used as a tool for 

management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Fire-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-MgtApp-D, FW-FprodDC-1, FW-Fprod-DC-2, FWTerrERU-All-DC-2, FW-TerrERUAll-G-2, FW-WUI-DC-2, FW-WUIDC-3, FW-WUI-DC-4, FW-WUIDC-5, FW-WUI-DC-6, FW-WUI-G1

206-108

Protect Walnut Canyon environs. Focus on maintenance and/or improvement 

of soil condition and watershed function. Degraded meadows and stream 

channels will be improved through a variety of management activities 

designed to increase herbaceous ground cover and litter and reduce soil 

erosion. System roads and trails should receive adequate maintenance so 

that accelerated soil erosion is minimal. Nonsystem roads will be rehabilitated 

and some poorly located roads will be re-located.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-RdsFac-G-1, 

FW-RdsFac-G-6, FW-Rec-TrailsG-1, FW-Rip-All-G-1, FW-RipStrm-DC-1, FW-Rip-Strm-G-2, 

FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-G-1, FWSoil-G-2, FW-Water-DC-1, FWWater-DC-2, FW-Water-G-1

206-108

Maintain sensitive species habitat. Ponderosa pine lands progress towards 

desired forest structure, including Mexican spotted owl and northern goshawk 

habitats.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FWTerrERU-PP-DC-1, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-G-2, FW-WFP-G-3, FWWFP-G-4, FW-WFP-S-1

206-108 Reduce instances of illegal activities and trash dumping.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-3 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

194

Management Area 37 – Walnut Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-108

Emphasize the social values compatible with an urban interface that includes 

recognition of the area’s opportunity for wildlife, recreational, and scenic 

values. Provide forage and security for a variety of game and non-game 

species of wildlife, provide conservation and environmental education 

opportunities, provide an area for recreational uses for the Flagstaff public, 

and manage a portion of the area to give a quiet, almost primitive recreation 

experience.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-G-1, FW-RecAll-DC-1, FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FWRec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, 

FW-Rec-All-DC-8, FW-ScenicDC-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, FW-WFPDC-10, FW-WFP-DC-2, FW-WFPDC-5, FW-WFP-G-1, FW-WFP-G2, FW-WFP-G-3, MA-Walnut-DC2

206-108

Per the Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map, expand 

Primitive (Non-motorized) settings in and around the steepest portions of 

Walnut Canyon. Expand Semi-primitive Non-motorized settings on Campbell 

Mesa, around Walnut Canyon, in the Skunk/Fay Canyon area and northwest 

of Fisher Point. The Skunk/Fay Canyon areas and lands north of Fisher Point 

are classified as SPNM ROS settings with one or two SPM road corridors 

located to protect important habitat characteristics and soil and water needs of 

the canyon rim. Roaded Natural settings continue in some portions of the MA 

along the Lake Mary Road corridor.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-2, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Rec-All-G-1 

206-109 Balance recreation demands with sensitive resources such as sensitive 

species habitats, fragile riparian vegetation, and erosive soils on steep slopes.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1 

206-109

Reduce the risk of catastrophic fire especially in the Urban/Rural Influence 

Zone. There is concern for wildfire losses to the National Monument from fires 

starting southwest of the park. Balance the need to reduce wildfire risk in 

these areas with desired conditions for Primitive and Semi-primitive ROS 

settings and disturbance sensitive species habitat. Reference FLEA area-wide 

direction and other the Forest Plan management direction related to 

vegetation and fire management.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-1, FWFire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtApp-D, FWWUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, FWWUI-DC-4, FW-WUI-DC-5, FWWUI-G-1 

206-109

Per the area-wide FLEA direction: meet with specific communities, City and 

County officials and consider input for Forest road and trail management, 

discourage proliferation of unneeded trails, create a primary trail system that 

serves as a collector for trails that originate in neighborhoods, convert some 

roads that are not needed for the road system south and east of Walnut 

Canyon to motorized trails outside of SPNM areas.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-6, FW-RdsFacMgtApp-A, FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FWRec-Trails-DC-1, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-11, FW-Rec-Trails-G-3, FWRec-Trails-MgtApp-C, FW-RecTrails-O-1, MA-Walnut-MgtApp-A
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

195

Management Area 37 – Walnut Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-109

Formalize and recognize commitments by the various federal, State, and local 

government entities to manage the lands between the urban growth 

boundaries (UGB) and the national monument to retain its recreational and 

scenic values. Governmental commitments for the management of 

recreational and scenic lands between the Walnut Canyon NM and the UGB 

shall reflect the following objectives and intents:  ̈ Protect the natural and 

cultural resources in the urban/wildland interface and the lands surrounding 

the national monument.  ̈ Encourage the City and County to designate and 

require access points from developed or to be developed areas onto public 

lands.  ̈ Encourage the City and County to provide a transition zone of open 

space or low density from higher density development where adjacent to 

public lands.  ̈ Cooperate with NPS in its efforts to monitor the use of and 

impacts on the natural and cultural resources of the Monument.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-DC-1, 

FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-A, MA-WalnutG-1, MA-Walnut-MgtApp-A 

206-110 High-quality daytime recreation will be available with few developed recreation 

facilities.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-Walnut-DC-1 

206-110

Before permitting outfitter/guides adjacent to National Monuments, contact the 

National Park Service for coordination. Outfitter guiding might also help meet 

the mission of the National Park Service in the National Monuments or on 

adjacent National Forest lands.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-MgtApp-J, MAWalnut-G-1, MA-Walnut-MgtAppA 

206-110

Follow FLEA area-wide direction including generally, do not place additional 

outfitter/guide activities or group activities in Walnut Canyon from Fisher Point 

east, any spring or perennial stream site, except in support of approved 

research and/or to improve safety or provide site rehabilitation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-G-16, FWSpecUse-G-19, FW-SpecUse-G-3 

206-110 Portions of this MA will be closed to camping as noted on the Camping 

Objectives Map.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Disp-DC-4, FW-RecDisp-S-1, MA-Walnut-G-1 

206-110

Manage the Canyon Vista area to provide parking, day-use trails, and 

overnight camping for individuals and groups. Facilities at the site should be 

designed to limit resource impacts and provide a camping experience at the 

less developed end of the spectrum for developed campgrounds.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-DevDC-2, MA-Walnut-DC-1 

206-110 Recreation use should be concentrated along main corridors with few roads, 

trails, and people in between.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-Rec-All-G-2, 

MA-Walnut-G-1 

206-110 Within Walnut Canyon itself, discourage off trail use.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-DC-11, FW-RecTrails-G-3, MA-Walnut-G-1 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

196

Management Area 37 – Walnut Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-110

Consider impacts to viewsheds of the National Monument and consider input 

from Park Service personnel when designing or approving projects in this 

viewshed.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-Scenic-G1, FW-Scenic-MgtApp-B, MAWalnut-MgtApp-A

206-110

Developments such as roads, trails, camping, day-use sites, and trailheads 

mimic local materials and landscape characteristics to blend with the adjacent 

natural-appearing landscape.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G10, FW-Rec-All-G-1, FW-RecTrails-G-1, FW-Scenic-DC-2, FWScenic-DC-7, FW-Scenic-G-1

206-110

Provide fast clean-up from management activities and limit short-term visual 

impacts (1 to 3 years), while meeting fire potential reduction needs, design 

thinning for long-term scenic quality adjacent to homes and along major 

highways or near developed recreation sites.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-G-2, FW-Scenic-DC-4, 

FW-Scenic-G-1, FW-Scenic-G-2, 

FW-Scenic-G-3, FW-WUI-DC-4 

206-111

Throughout the entire management area, activities, such as thinning and 

prescribed fire, result over the long-term, in alterations that appear natural to 

most visitors.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-DC2, FW-Scenic-G-1 

206-111

Do thinning with sensitivity to scenic values and recreation uses. Examples 

may include but are not limited to, feathering edges of thinning boundaries, 

careful placement and use of roads to access thinning areas, and creating a 

variety of tree densities, sizes, types and openings.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Scenic-DC-1, FW-Scenic-DC2, FW-Scenic-DC-4, FW-ScenicG-1, FW-Scenic-G-2, FW-ScenicG-3, FW-Scenic-G-4, FWTerrERU-All-G-1

206-111

Cooperate with the City of Flagstaff and National Park Service to develop 

study proposals and projects designed to evaluate best management 

practices, reservoir modifications, and/or operational criteria to address the 

objectives of maintaining the quality of the municipal water supply and 

increasing the likelihood of flood flows and improvement of the inner-canyon 

environment in Walnut Canyon National Monument (per the Stipulation 

Between The City of Flagstaff and the United States on Behalf of the National 

Park Service and the Forest Service).

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Water-DC-1, FW-Water-DC2, FW-Water-DC-5, FW-WaterDC-6, MA-LkMary-MgtApp-C, 

MA-Walnut-MgtApp-A 

206-111

Continue active monitoring of cultural and historical sites to impacts from 

recreation, cattle grazing, firewood cutting, and other human uses. Changes in 

management can occur in response to demonstrated (through monitoring) 

negative impacts to archaeological resources. Cooperate with available Park 

Service personnel to assist with monitoring.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Hrtg-DC-1, FW-Hrtg-MgtAppA, FW-Hrtg-MgtApp-C, FW-HrtgMgtApp-F, FW-Hrtg-O-1, FWHrtg-O-2, MA-Walnut-MgtApp-A 

206-111

In the Primitive, Semi-primitive Non-motorized, and Semi-primitive Motorized 

ROS settings maintain large tracts of unfragmented habitat for turkey and 

bear.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-AllDC-6, FW-Rec-All-G-1 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

197

Management Area 37 – Walnut Canyon

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-111

Coordinate with the NPS concerning the fencing of newly acquired National 

Monument lands, access and interpretation of the “first fort” area, and

protection activities, such as reduction of fuel hazard and closure of roads 

accessing the canyon rims.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-Walnut-MgtApp-A 

206-111

National Forest jurisdiction will be maintained for all lands in the Walnut 

Canyon MA. No land exchanges will occur unless the purpose is to acquire 

land within this MA through exchange of national forest lands elsewhere.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

MA-Walnut-S-2 

206-112

Cooperate with other agencies and local governments to maintain the Arizona 

State Trust Lands* in Wildland/open space status. Pursue purchase or land 

exchange options for the purpose of conservation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-LndAdj-G-1, FW-LndAdjMgtApp-B, FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-D, 

FW-LndAdj-MgtApp-E
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

198

Management Area 38 - West

Management Area 38 - West

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-114

More than half of this MA is within the Urban/Rural Influence Zone. Within the 

Urban/Rural Influence Zone, and along the Highway 89A corridor, reduce the 

risk of catastrophic wildfire, emphasize daytime recreation activities, both 

motorized and non-motorized, balance recreation demands with protection of 

the soils, water, wildlife and vegetation, and maintain public access to public 

lands. Reduce instances of illegal activities and trash dumping. Maintain 

scenic quality. Opportunities for firewood or other forest products are rare, 

however, firewood sales may be used as a tool for management. Maintain 

wildlife travelways.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-2, FW-Fprod-DC-1, 

FW-Rec-All-DC-4, FW-Rec-All-G1, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-3, FW-RecTrails-MgtApp-C, FW-Scenic-DC1, FW-Scenic-DC-2, FW-ScenicG-1, FW-Soil-DC-1, FW-Soil-G-1, 

FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, FWWater-DC-1, FW-WFP-DC-1, FWWFP-DC-6, FW-WFP-G-6, MAFlagN-DC-6, MA-PineBelt-DC-3

206-114

In the remainder of the MA, re-introduce fire’s natural role as much as 

possible, progress towards desired conditions described (MSO and goshawk 

guidelines), restore meadows, and promote healthy pine/oak forests. Minimize 

recreation impacts to disturbance sensitive species. Maintain wildlife 

travelways.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-1, FW-Eco-DC-3, 

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-2, FWRec-All-G-1, FW-TerrERU-All-DC2, FW-TerrERU-All-G-2, FWWFP-DC-11, FW-WFP-DC-6, FWWFP-G-6, FW-WFP-S-1, FWWUI-DC-2

206-114 Take actions to help protect and maintain high quality water in Oak Creek.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-TerrERU-All-G-1, FW-WaterDC-7, FW-Water-G-2, FW-WaterG-4, MA-PineBelt-G-1

206-114

Per the Objectives for Recreation Opportunity Spectrum map, maintain 

Semiprimitive Non-motorized settings on portions of Woody Ridge, A-1 

Mountain and west of A-1 Mountain. In the remainder of National Forest lands, 

maintain patches of Semi-primitive Motorized habitat with Roaded Natural 

corridors along major roads or in smaller National Forest inholdings. In this 

MA, the Semiprimitive settings have higher numbers of people than occur in 

outlying MA’s.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-4 

206-114

The portions of this MA that lie southwest of developed lands are high priority 

for fire risk reduction efforts. This includes the Urban/Rural Influence Zone and 

the Wildland Urban Interface as depicted on the Fire Management Analysis 

Zones map. Reference FLEA area-wide direction.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Fire-DC-2, FW-Fire-G-1, FWWUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3 

206-115

Maintain the major wildlife corridor that crosses Highway 180 and another 

corridor between Pumphouse Wash and Woody Ridge, south of Kachina 

Village.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-6, FW-WFP-G-6, 

FW-WFP-MgtApp-G 
Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume IV

Appendix I: Crosswalk between Coconino 1987 Forest Plan (as amended) and the Revised Forest Plan

Coconino National Forest

199

Management Area 38 - West

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-115

Areas near to residential private lands may have large numbers of people on 

some occasions. Daytime activities are emphasized with some designated 

overnight camping opportunities. Encounters with other people are frequent 

here, but there will still be places to "get away" and enjoy solitude.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Rec-Disp-DC-4 

206-115

Adjacent to residential areas improve trailhead signing, brochures and 

directional signing. Recreation opportunities will be somewhat "advertised," 

but each residential area will need to provide input on the level of information 

provided.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-InterpEd-DC-1, FW-InterpEdDC-2, FW-InterpEd-DC-3, FWInterpEd-DC-7, FW-InterpEd-G-2, 

MA-FlagN-MgtApp-A, MA-FlagNMgtApp-B

206-116 Balance demands for non-motorized and motorized trails and provide 

opportunities for both.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-G-2, FW-Rec-TrailsDC-2, FW-Rec-Trails-DC-5, FWRec-Trails-MgtApp-C

206-116

Coordinate trailhead parking with future development on adjacent private 

lands, in order to take advantage of the opportunity to be proactive in 

designing trails and trailheads to maintain access to public lands.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-Trails-MgtApp-E 

206-116

Per the FLEA Area-wide direction, focus special use permits away from 

urban/residential areas. Generally, do not place additional outfitter/guide 

activities or group activities in Pumphouse Wash, any spring or perennial 

stream site, except in support of approved research and/or to improve safety 

or provide site rehabilitation.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-SpecUse-DC-7, FWSpecUse-G-16, FW-SpecUse-G19, FW-SpecUse-G-2, FWSpecUse-G-3 

206-116

In the Fort Valley and A-1 Mountain areas, maintain the wildlife travelway that 

connects A-1 Mountain, Observatory Mesa, and the slopes of the San 

Francisco Mountain.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-6, FW-WFP-G-6 

206-116 Lands west of A-1 Mountain in Semi-primitive Non-motorized ROS setting 

maintain large tracts of unfragmented habitat for turkey and bear.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rec-All-DC-10, FW-Rec-AllDC-4, FW-Rec-All-DC-6 

206-116

In the Oak Creek watershed, high priority is given to minimizing soil erosion 

and sedimentation from Forest system roads and trails. Proper maintenance 

and drainage will be emphasized as well as relocating roads from meadows 

and obliterating unnecessary roads.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-RdsFac-G-1, FW-RdsFac-G2, FW-RdsFac-G-6, FW-RecTrails-G-1, FW-Water-DC-1, FWWater-DC-2, FW-Water-DC-3, 

FW-Water-G-2, FW-Water-G-4
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Coconino National Forest

200

Management Area 38 - West

Page 

Number 1987 Plan Component How it was Addressed Related Components in Proposed Revised Plan

206-116

Where perennial stream flow is present, riparian communities should have 

adequate in-stream flows and adequate plant cover to protect stream banks 

and dissipate energy during high flows. Channel characteristics and water 

support natural biodiversity. Ensure adequate instream flow water rights to 

maintain aquatic communities and water sources for wildlife.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Rip-All-DC-1, FW-Rip-All-DC2, FW-Rip-All-DC-5, FW-Rip-AllG-2, FW-Rip-Strm-DC-1, FWWater-G-3, FW-Water-MgtApp-D, 

FW-Water-MgtApp-E, FW-WaterMgtApp-F, FW-WFP-DC-1

206-116 Avoid or limit human disturbance to rare species such as peregrine falcon and 

Arizona bugbane.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WFP-DC-11, FW-WFP-G-1, 

FW-WFP-G-11, FW-WFP-G-2, 

FW-WFP-G-3, FW-WFP-G-8, FWWFP-MgtApp-E, FW-WFPMgtApp-F, FW-WFP-S-2

206-116

There are known populations of non-native and invasive plants in this MA, 

such as bull thistle in Pumphouse Wash. Continue efforts to control or 

eradicate these weeds and coordinate with recreation and lands uses to 

prevent spread.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Invas-DC-1, FW-Invas-DC-2, 

FW-Invas-G-1, FW-Invas-G-2, 

FW-Invas-G-3, FW-Rec-All-G-6, 

FW-Rec-Dev-DC-9, FWSpecUse-G-1, FW-SpecUse-G-21

206-117

Per the FLEA Area-wide direction, reduce potential for catastrophic wildfire 

within the Urban/Rural Influence zone. Because of prevailing winds and steep 

terrain, lands south and west of the Urban/Rural Influence zone should be 

evaluated for wildfire risks and appropriate measures taken to reduce potential 

for catastrophic fire. Continue partnerships with city, county, and State fire 

departments to coordinate fire hazard reduction treatments, prevention, and 

suppression.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-Eco-DC-2, FW-Fire-DC-2, 

FW-Fire-DC-3, FW-Fire-G-1, FWFire-G-2, FW-Fire-MgtApp-B, FWFire-MgtApp-D, FW-TerrERU-AllDC-1, FW-TerrERU-All-DC-2, 

FW-WUI-DC-2, FW-WUI-DC-3, 

FW-WUI-DC-4, FW-WUI-G-1

206-117

Some of the Arizona State Trust Land parcels in this MA are Centennial 

Forest. Coordinate with the Director of the Centennial Forest when conducting 

management activities on adjacent National Forest lands.

Addressed in plan 

components and/or 

management approaches.

FW-WUI-G-1