alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                          GoAmerica, Inc. Subsidiaries
                          ----------------------------


1.   GoAmerica Communications Corp. (Delaware corporation)
     433 Hackensack Avenue
     Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

2.   GoAmerica Marketing, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
     433 Hackensack Avenue
     Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

3.   Wynd Communications Corporation (California corporation)
     75 Higuera Street, Suite 240
     San Luis Obispo, California 93401

4.   Hotpaper.com, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
     33 New Montgomery Street, Suite 1040
     San Francisco, California 94105
#### § 101-27.204 Types of shelf-life items.

Shelf-life items are classified as nonextendable (Type I) and extendable (Type II). Type I items have a definite storage life after which the item or material is considered to be no longer usable for its primary function and should be discarded. Type II items are those for which successive reinspection dates can be established when the items have a continued usability as determined by examination based upon criteria that have been agreed upon. Examples of Type I items are drugs and medicines with certain characteristics. Examples of Type II items are paint and ink.

[40 FR 59595, Dec. 29, 1975]
TO: RCRA Docket EPA

- HQ

- RCRA

- 2012

- 0426

FROM: Richard Huggins Jr.
On November 14, 2012 , Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery (ORCR) staff met with representatives of the Consumer Specialty Products Association (CSPA), Giant Resource Recovery (GRR), and Ball to discuss aerosol can design, assembly, construction, specifications , recycling and regulations governing aerosol can design and safety

.

Attendees:
Ross Elliot, Rich ard Huggins Jr., Kristin Fitzgerald, Eric Roberts, Jessica Young, Charlotte Mooney, and Greg Helms (ORCR)
Mike Stephenson, Richard Leahy (Walmart)
Micah Thompson (Advanced Auto Parts)
Doug Fratz (CSPA)
John Blum (Ball)
Mike Deyo, Gary Okey (GRR)
22-cv-81539-DMM

Oct 5, 2022 s/ Juan Ulacia

Case 9:22-cv-81539-DMM Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2022 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2796

___________

Tom Lingenfelter, Individually; Phil *

Florence, Individually and as *

Beneficiary in Empire Paper Company *

Profit Sharing Plan; Diane S. Blodgett, *

Individually and as a Vested *

Beneficiary; T.G. Morgan, Inc., *

Defined Benefit Pension Plan, *

* Appeal from the United States

Appellants, * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

v. * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

John Stoebner; Lapp, Libra, Thomson, *

Stoebner & Pusch, Chtd.; Gordon Conn; *

Charles Webber; Faegre & Benson, *

LLP; Kalina, Wills, Gisvold & Clark, *

P.L.L.P.; Larson, Allen, Weishair & *

Co., LLP, in their Individual Capacities; *

H.S.B.C. Bank USA, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 17, 2006

Filed: July 20, 2006

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District

Court for the District of Minnesota.

2

Lingenfelter v. Stoebner, No. 03-CV-5544, 2005 WL 1225950 (D. Minn. May

23, 2005).

3

We exercise our discretion not to impose on our own motion damages or costs

upon appellants under Fed. R. App. P. 38.

-2-

This long-running litigation, which stretches back to the early 1990s, was

brought to an end by the district court’s 1

 May 24, 2005, judgment, entered upon the

court’s May 23, 2005, order, dismissing the complaint.

Having considered the parties’ arguments, we conclude that, for the reasons set

forth in the district court’s comprehensive, well-reasoned opinion,2

 the judgment

should be, and it hereby is, affirmed. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.3

______________________________
# Price and Average TATs
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00173

- CR

IN RE ROBERT WHITFIE LD

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this original proceeding, Relator Robert Whitfield seeks a writ of mandamus
compelling Respondent Brian Evans, Freestone County District Attorney, to respond to

Whitfield’s motion for early termination of his obligation to register as a sex offender. S ee

T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 62.404 (West 2018 ).
A court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district
attorney except to protect its jurisdiction. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221(a), (b) ( West
Supp. 2017 ) . Whitfi eld’s petition does not allege facts that require us to protect our jurisdiction, so w e do not have jurisdiction to decide his petition for writ of mandamus
against the District Attorney.

We thus dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.In re Whitfield Page 2 REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition dismissed Opi nion delivered and filed May 30, 2018 Do not publish [OT06]
#### EDMUND KELLY, Respondent, v. THE FALL BROOK COAL COMPANY, Appellant.

*Principal*— *when bound, by contracts of agent.*

An agent who is accustomed to make contracts for his principal, with the principal’s knowledge, may bind the principal by his contracts, although the instructions of the agent are not to contract without his'principal’s knowledge.

*262Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the report of a referee.

The action was brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract, claimed by the plaintiff to have been made between him and the defendant about June 7, 1873. The plaintiff alleges an agreement by defendant *“*to load his vessel and furnish a cargo from the office Of defendant, at Watkins, in the county of Schuyler, to some point east, in turn with the defendant’s boats, and in that way give full cargoes and employment for the plaintiff’s boat and its master and crew during the said season,” and alleges, as a breach, that his boat was not loaded in turn, but was kept idle, and claims damages for such breach.

*Hurd &*Fletcher, for the appellant.

*William Lounsbery,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 955.3 Contents of notice of appeal. ( a ) A notice of appeal from a contracting officer's decision should indicate that an appeal is thereby intended. It should identify the contract by number or other identifying reference, and identify the decision from which the appeal is taken, or it should attach a copy of the contracting officer's decision. If an appeal is taken from the failure of a contracting officer to issue a decision, the notice of appeal should describe in detail the claim that the contracting officer has failed to decide and/or attach a copy of the claim that the contracting officer has failed to decide, and explain that the contracting officer has failed to decide the claim as required.
( b ) The notice of appeal should be signed personally by the appellant (the contractor taking the appeal), or by an officer of the appellant corporation or member of the appellant firm, or by the contractor's duly authorized representative or attorney. The complaint referred to in § 955.7 may be filed with the notice of appeal, or the appellant may designate the notice of appeal as a complaint, if it otherwise fulfills the requirements of a complaint.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,989,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,223,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (228,857)
<INVENTORY>                                    229,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,099,922
<PP&E>                                       3,631,582
<DEPRECIATION>                               (700,102)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,129,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,204,932
<BONDS>                                        827,517
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,467,631
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,139,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,129,908
<SALES>                                      5,102,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,102,505
<CGS>                                        3,503,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,677,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,747,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (349,912)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,397,630)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:22-cv-23684-JAL   Document 7   Entered on FLSD Docket 11/22/2022   Page 1 of 1
§ 954.12 Change of place of hearing. Not later than the date fixed for the filing of the answer, a party may file a request that a hearing be held to receive evidence in his or her behalf at a place other than that designated for hearing in the notice. He or she shall support his request with a statement setting forth: ( a ) The evidence to be offered in such place;
( b ) The names and addresses of the witnesses who will testify;
( c ) The reasons why such evidence cannot be produced at Arlington, VA.
The presiding officer shall give consideration to the convenience and necessity of the parties and the relevancy of the evidence to be offered. [36 FR 11567, June 16, 1971, as amended at 62 FR 66998, Dec. 23, 1997; 63 FR 66050, Dec. 1, 1998]
### Deposits of pre-1980 pyroclastic flows and lahars from Mount St. Helens Volcano, Washington

By: D. R. Crandell

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1444

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37584-37585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15244]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a

[[Page 37585]]

meeting on June 21, 2000, 9 a.m., at the Board's meeting room on the 
8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, 
Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

(1) Report on the Quality Audit of the Railroad Retirement Board 
Occupational Disability Process
(2) Medicare Transition

    The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to 
contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the 
Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: June 12, 2000.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-15244 Filed 6-13-00; 10:25 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.2
                            AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY
          COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                           Six Months
                              Ended
                          June 30, 2003            Years Ended December 31,
                          -------------   ------------------------------------------
                           (Unaudited)     2002     2001     2000     1999     1998
                          -------------   ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
<S>                           <C>         <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings:
Pretax income from
   continuing operations      $2,093      $3,727   $1,596   $3,908   $3,438   $2,925
Interest expense                 824       1,846    2,888    2,952    2,178    2,224
Other adjustments                 84         174      175      163      151      124
                              ------      ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
Total earnings (a)            $3,001      $5,747   $4,659   $7,023   $5,767   $5,273
                              ======      ======   ======   ======   ======   ======

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense           $  824      $1,846   $2,888   $2,952   $2,178   $2,224
   Other adjustments              72         151      170      165      152      129
                              ------      ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
Total fixed charges (b)       $  896      $1,997   $3,058   $3,117   $2,330   $2,353
                              ======      ======   ======   ======   ======   ======

Ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges (a/b)          3.35        2.88     1.52     2.25     2.48     2.24
</TABLE>

Included in interest expense in the above computation is interest expense
related to the international banking operations of American Express Company
("American Express") and Travel Related Services' cardmember lending
activities, which is netted against interest and dividends and cardmember
lending net finance charge revenue, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements
of Income.

For purposes of the "earnings" computation, other adjustments include adding the
amortization of capitalized interest, the net loss of affiliates accounted for
at equity whose debt is not guaranteed by American Express, the minority
interest in the earnings of majority-owned subsidiaries with fixed charges, and
the interest component of rental expense and subtracting undistributed net
income of affiliates accounted for at equity.

For purposes of the "fixed charges" computation, other adjustments include
capitalized interest costs and the interest component of rental expense.
§ 80.1118 Marina Del Rey, CA. ( a ) A line drawn from Marina Del Rey Breakwater South Light 1 to Marina Del Rey Light 4.
( b ) A line drawn from Marina Del Rey Breakwater North Light 2 to Marina Del Rey Light 3.
( c ) A line drawn from Marina Del Rey Light 4 to the seaward extremity of the Ballona Creek South Jetty.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5457

To provide for the interconnection of distributed generation facilities with

local electric distribution systems, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2000

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself, Mrs. WILSON, and Mr. HUNTER) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To provide for the interconnection of distributed generation

facilities with local electric distribution systems, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Distributed Generation

5 Promotion Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. INTERCONNECTION OF LOCAL DISTRIBUTION FA7 CILITIES.

8 Section 210 of the Federal Power Act is amended by

9 adding the following at the end thereof:
2

•HR 5457 IH

1 ‘‘(f) SPECIAL RULE FOR DISTRIBUTED GENERA2 TION.—

3 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this subsection:

4 ‘‘(A) LOCAL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY.—

5 The term ‘local distribution company’ means

6 any entity which owns, controls, or operates, for

7 public use, local distribution facilities.

8 ‘‘(B) LOCAL DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES.—

9 The term ‘local distribution facilities’ means

10 any facilities used for the local distribution of

11 electric energy. Such term does not include any

12 facilities determined under section 201(h) to be

13 transmission facilities.

14 ‘‘(C) DISTRIBUTED GENERATION.—The

15 term ‘distributed generation facility’ means an

16 electric power generation facility that is de17 signed to serve retail electric consumers at or

18 near the facility site and interconnect with local

19 distribution facilities.

20 ‘‘(2) INTERCONNECTION.—A local distribution

21 company shall interconnect a distributed generation

22 facility with the local distribution facilities of such

23 company if the distributed generation facility owner

24 or operator complies with the final rule promulgated

25 under paragraph (3) and pays the just, reasonable,
3

•HR 5457 IH

1 and nondiscriminatory costs directly related to such

2 interconnection, as determined by the Commission.

3 ‘‘(3) RULES.—Within one year after the date of

4 enactment of this subsection, the Commission shall

5 promulgate a final rule to establish safety, reli6 ability, and power quality standards relating to dis7 tributed generation facilities. To the extent feasible,

8 the Commission shall develop the standards through

9 a process involving interested parties. For purposes

10 of developing such standards, the Commission shall

11 establish an advisory committee composed of quali12 fied experts to make recommendations to the Com13 mission.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          52,954
<SECURITIES>                                       489
<RECEIVABLES>                                  155,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,508
<INVENTORY>                                    439,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               660,786
<PP&E>                                         429,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                 192,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,202,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          325,002
<BONDS>                                        235,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,031
<OTHER-SE>                                     571,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,202,610
<SALES>                                        525,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               525,799
<CGS>                                          257,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  257,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               233,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,547
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,326
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,493
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,833
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

This Order applies to the following cases:

No. 9:20-cv-82156-Lucibella v. Town of Ocean Ridge et al.- LEIBOWITZ

No. 9:22-cv-80360-TradeInvest Asset Management Company (BVI) Ltd. et al v. Wrigley Jr. et 

al.- LEIBOWITZ

No. 9:22-cv-81569-Legacy Knight Strategic Opportunities Fund-Parallel Series v. Wrigley Jr. et 

al.- LEIBOWITZ

No. 9:23-cv-81273-Osborne v. Cinemark USA, Inc.- LEIBOWITZ

No. 9:23-cv-81287-Freeman v. Jupiter Inlet Colony- LEIBOWITZ

ORDER

Upon a sua sponte review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED that a Status Conference is set for Wednesday, April 10, 2024, at 2:00 

p.m. via Zoom. At the conference, the parties must be prepared to address the 

overall status and procedural history of the case, any pending motions, and scheduling 

matters. At least one counsel of record shall appear for each party.

To join the Zoom status conference, click on the link below.

https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1613455938?pwd=dkE0bXJNRDVvdTFhbzRzR2p

SREU2QT09

Meeting ID: 161 345 5938 / Passcode: 149485

Case 9:22-cv-81569-DSL Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/26/2024 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida this 25th day 

of March, 2024.

 

____________________________________

DAVID S. LEIBOWITZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81569-DSL Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/26/2024 Page 2 of 2