alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Open Commission Meeting, Thursday, January 
20, 2000

January 13, 2000.
    The Federal Communications Commission will hold an Open Meeting on 
the subject listed below on Thursday, January 20, 2000, which is 
scheduled to commence at 9:30 a.m. in Room TW-C305, at 445 12th Street, 
S.W., Washington, D.C.

Item No., Bureau, and Subject

1--Mass Media--Title: Creation of Low Power Radio Service (MM Docket 
No. 99-25, RM's--9208 and 9242). Summary: The Commission will consider 
further action regarding the establishment of a low power FM radio 
service.
2--Mass Media--Title: Review of the Commission's Broadcast and Cable 
Equal Employment Opportunity Rules and Policies (MM Docket No. 98-204); 
and Termination of the EEO Streamlining Proceeding (MM Docket No. 96-
16). Summary: The Commission will consider further action regarding 
equal employment opportunity rules and policies for broadcasters and 
cable entities, including multichannel video programming distributors.

    Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Maureen Peratino or David Fiske, Office of Media Relations, telephone 
number (202) 418-0500; TTY (202) 418-2555.
    Copies of materials adopted at this meeting can be purchased from 
the FCC's duplicating contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc. (ITS, Inc.) at (202) 857-3800; fax (202) 857-3805 and 857-3184; or 
TTY (202) 293-8810. These copies are available in paper format and 
alternative media, including large print/type; digital disk; and audio 
tape. ITS may be reached by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="543d20270b0b3d3a37143d2c7a3a3120373b397a373b39">[email protected]</a>. Their 
Internet address is http://www.itsi.com.
    This meeting can be viewed over George Mason University's Capitol 
Connection. The Capitol Connection also will carry the meeting live via 
the Internet. For information on these services call (703) 993-3100. 
The audio portion of the meeting will be broadcast live on the Internet 
via the FCC's Internet audio broadcast page at http://www.fcc.gov/realaudio/>. The meeting can also be heard via telephone, for a fee, 
from National Narrowcast Network, telephone (202) 966-2211 or fax (202) 
966-1770. Audio and video tapes of this meeting can be purchased from 
Infocus, 341 Victory Drive, Herndon, VA 20170, telephone (703) 834-
0100; fax number (703) 834-0111.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1464 Filed 1-18-00; 11:33 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06622**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 06622\06622_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06622\06622_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 06622\06622_Followup Questions1.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

06622\06622_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 06622\06622_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06622\06622_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06622\06622_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06622\06622_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06622\06622_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06622\06622_telecon1.pdf Technical Review Correspondence

06622\Certification Statement Plant ID 06622.pdf Plant certification statement x 06622\FGD Purge Follow Up_01_26_2012.pdf Technical Review Correspondence x 06622\Telecon - FGD Purge Discharge.docx Technical Review Correspondence x 06622\Responses\06622_Followup Questions1.xlsm Technical Review Correspondence x 06622\Responses\06622_PartB revised.xlsm Technical Review Correspondence x 06622\Responses\06622_PartC revised.xlsm Technical Review Correspondence x 06622\Responses\06622_PartD Revised.xlsm Technical Review Correspondence

06622\Supplemental Documents\06622 - 2010-09-15 Effluent Guidelines Certification.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 06622\Supplemental Documents\06622_Part A Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06622\Supplemental Documents\06622_Part A Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06622\Supplemental Documents\06622_Part A_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06622\Supplemental Documents\06622_PartC_Bottom Ash Handling Diagram U3.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06622\Supplemental Documents\06622_PartC_Bottom Ash Handling Diagrams U1_2.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06622\Supplemental Documents\06622_PartD_D-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06622\Supplemental Documents\06622_PartD_D-2.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06622\Supplemental Documents\Naughton Updated Water Balance Diagram.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4884 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4884

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 200 West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, as the ``William S. 
                   Broomfield Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4884

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 200 West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, as the ``William S. 
                   Broomfield Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 
West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, and known as the Royal Oak Post 
Office, shall be known and designated as the ``William S. Broomfield 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William S. Broomfield Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 6, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 09, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 09, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A25I0002. DENNIS MALCOLM PATTERSON v. ABHAY KUMAR SINGH.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

21CV0701
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 





 
  
 Share
Certificate of Canaan Inc. (formerly known as Canaan Cayman Holdings Ltd.) (the “Company”) Incorporated in Cayman Islands Authorized Capital: US$50,000 divided into 1,000,000,000,000 shares of par value US$0.00000005 each, of which (i)
999,643,375,556 shares are designated as Class A Ordinary Shares, and (ii) 356,624,444 shares are designated as Class B Ordinary Shares. This is to certify that the undermentioned person is the registered holder of the shares specified hereunder in
the Company, subject to the Articles of Association of the Company. Name & Address of the Shareholder: Certificate No.: Class of Shares: Class A Ordinary No. of Shares: Consideration Paid: Date of Issue: Given under the common seal of the
Company on the date stated herein. Director / Officer NO TRANSFER OF ANY OF THE ABOVE SHARES CAN BE REGISTERED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THIS CERTIFICATE 







 



 
  
 Share
Certificate of Canaan Inc. (formerly known as Canaan Cayman Holdings Ltd.) (the “Company”) Incorporated in Cayman Islands Authorized Capital: US$50,000 divided into 1,000,000,000,000 shares of par value US$0.00000005 each, of which (i)
999,643,375,556 shares are designated as Class A Ordinary Shares, and (ii) 356,624,444 shares are designated as Class B Ordinary Shares. This is to certify that the undermentioned person is the registered holder of the shares specified hereunder in
the Company, subject to the Articles of Association of the Company. Name & Address of the Shareholder: Certificate No.: Class of Shares: Class B Ordinary No. of Shares: Consideration Paid: Date of Issue: Given under the common seal of the
Company on the date stated herein. Director / Officer NO TRANSFER OF ANY OF THE ABOVE SHARES CAN BE REGISTERED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THIS CERTIFICATE
#### § 3030.120 General.

This subpart describes the process for the periodic adjustment of rates subject to the percentage limitations specified in § 3030.127 that are applicable to each class of mail.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5040 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5040

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that income 
    averaging for farmers not increase a farmer's liability for the 
                        alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

  Mr. Herger (for himself, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Hayworth, Ms. Dunn, Mr. 
 Tanner, Mr. Camp, Mr. McCrery, Mr. English, and Mr. Foley) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that income 
    averaging for farmers not increase a farmer's liability for the 
                        alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmer Tax Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. INCOME AVERAGING FOR FARMERS NOT TO INCREASE ALTERNATIVE 
              MINIMUM TAX LIABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 55(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(defining regular tax) is amended by redesignating paragraph (2) as 
paragraph (3) and by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Coordination with income averaging for farmers.--
        Solely for purposes of this section, section 1301 (relating to 
        averaging of farm income) shall not apply in computing the 
        regular tax.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
§ 80.145 Race Point, MA, to Watch Hill, RI. ( a ) Except inside lines specifically described in this section, the 72 COLREGS shall apply on the sounds, bays, harbors, and inlets along the coast of Cape Cod and the southern coasts of Massachusetts and Rhode Island from Race Point to Watch Hill.
( b ) A line drawn from Nobska Point Light to Tarpaulin Cove Light on the southeastern side of Naushon Island; thence from the southernmost tangent of Naushon Island to the easternmost extremity of Nashawena Island; thence from the southwestern most extremity of Nashawena Island to the easternmost extremity of Cuttyhunk Island; thence from the southwestern tangent of Cuttyhunk Island to the tower on Gooseberry Neck charted in approximate position latitude 41°29.1′ N., longitude 71°02.3′ W.
( c ) A line drawn from Sakonnet Breakwater Light 2 tangent to the southernmost part of Sachuest Point charted in approximate position latitude 41°28.5′ N., longitude 71°14.8′ W.
( d ) An east-west line drawn through Beavertail Light between Brenton Point and the Boston Neck shoreline.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977, as amended by CGD 79-036, 44 FR 22458, Apr. 16, 1979. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7786, Mar. 6, 1986; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39171, July 1, 2013]
§ 3021.14 Participation by others. ( a ) A person served by the post office to be closed or consolidated pursuant to the Postal Service written determination under review who desires to intervene in the proceeding, or any other interested person, or any counsel, agent, or other person authorized or recognized by the Postal Service as such interested person's representative or the representative of such interested person's recognized group, such as Postmasters, may participate in an appeal by sending written comments to the Postal Regulatory Commission in the manner described in § 3021.11.
( b ) Persons may submit comments supporting or opposing a Commission order returning the entire matter to the Postal Service for further consideration. Comments must be filed in accordance with the deadlines established in §§ 3021.41 through 3021.43. Commenters may use PRC Form 61, which is available on the Commission's website, *http://www.prc.gov .*
[85 FR 9655, Feb. 19, 2020]
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-80151-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ISAIAS PEREZ-BARTOLOME,

Defendant.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation entered by 

Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart following Change of Plea Hearing [ECF No. 18]. On 

November 2, 2022, Magistrate Judge Reinhart held a Change of Plea hearing [ECF No. 15] during 

which Defendant pled guilty to the sole count of the Indictment [ECF No. 9]. The Government 

submitted a factual proffer [ECF No. 16], and Defendant agreed that the Government’s proffer 

was true and correct. Magistrate Judge Reinhart thereafter issued a Report recommending that the 

Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to the sole count in the Indictment, that the Court find 

Defendant to have freely and voluntarily entered his guilty plea, and that the Court adjudicate him 

guilty of the sole count in the Indictment [ECF No. 9]. No party has filed objections to the Report, 

and the time to do so has expired. 

The Court has conducted a review of the record and finds no error in the Report. Therefore, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 18] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The guilty plea entered into by Defendant Isaias Perez-Bartolome as to the sole count

Case 9:22-cr-80151-AMC Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/21/2022 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-80151-CR-CANNON

of the Indictment is ACCEPTED.

3. Defendant Isaias Perez-Bartolome is adjudicated guilty of the sole count of the

Indictment, which charges him with illegal re-entry into the United States after 

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1) [ECF No. 9]. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 21st day of November

2022.

________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cr-80151-AMC Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/21/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 20.4 Amendments to the International Mail Manual.

(a) The current issue of the IMM is incorporated by reference, see § 20.1.

(b) New issues of the International Mail Manual will be incorporated by reference into this part and will be available at *https://pe.usps.gov.* The text of amendments to the International Mail Manual will be published in the Federal Register and will be available in the Postal Bulletin, copies of which may be accessed at *https://usps.com/cpim/ftp/bulletin/pb.htm.* Successive issues of the IMM are listed in Table 1 to this section.

| International Mail
Manual | Date of issuance |
| --- | --- |
| Issue 1 | November 13, 1981. |
| Issue 2 | March 1, 1983. |
| Issue 3 | July 4, 1985. |
| Issue 4 | September 18, 1986. |
| Issue 5 | April 21, 1988. |
| Issue 6 | October 5, 1988. |
| Issue 7 | July 20, 1989. |
| Issue 8 | June 28, 1990. |
| Issue 9 | February 3, 1991. |
| Issue 10 | June 25, 1992. |
| Issue 11 | December 24, 1992. |
| Issue 12 | July 8, 1993. |
| Issue 13 | February 3, 1994. |
| Issue 14 | August 4, 1994. |
| Issue 15 | July 9, 1995. |
| Issue 16 | January 4, 1996. |
| Issue 17 | September 12, 1996. |
| Issue 18 | June 9, 1997. |
| Issue 19 | October 9, 1997. |
| Issue 20 | July 2, 1998. |
| Issue 21 | May 3, 1999. |
| Issue 22 | January 1, 2000. |
| Issue 23 | July 1, 2000. |
| Issue 24 | January 1, 2001. |
| Issue 25 | July 1, 2001. |
| Issue 26 | January 1, 2002. |
| Issue 27 | June 30, 2002. |
| Issue 28 | January 1, 2003. |
| Issue 29 | July 1, 2003. |
| Issue 30 | August 1, 2004. |
| Issue 31 | May 31, 2005. |
| Issue 35 | May 12, 2008. |
| Issue 36 | May 11, 2009. |
| IMM | April 17, 2011. |
| IMM | June 24, 2012. |
| IMM | January 26, 2015. |
| IMM | July 11, 2016. |
| IMM | January 22, 2017. |
| IMM | March 5, 2018. |
| IMM | March 4, 2019. |
| IMM | July 1, 2020. |
| IMM | July 10, 2022. |
| IMM | January 21, 2024. |

Table 1 to § 20.4—International Mail Manual

[85 FR 61608, Sept. 30, 2020, as amended at 87 FR 63425, Oct. 19, 2022; 89 FR 15474, Mar. 4, 2024]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 113 (Monday, June 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14751]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Public Health Service Operating Divisions; Delegation of 
Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Public Health 
Service (PHS) Operating Division (OPDIV) Heads the service fellowships 
related authorities vested in the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services under Sections 207 and 208 of the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 209 and 
210, and under Title 42 CFR, Subpart B, Part 61--Service Fellowships.
    This delegation supersedes the delegation of authority memorandum 
titled, ``Delegation of Authority--Service Fellowships,'' to the PHS 
Agency Heads from the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health Management 
Operations, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, dated January 
8, 1993.
    This delegation becomes effective upon date of signature. Also, I 
hereby ratify and affirm the actions taken by you or your subordinates, 
which involved the exercise of authorities delegated herein prior to 
the effective date of this delegation.

    Dated: June 2, 2000.
Donna E. Shalala,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14751 Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-1178-18T2

THE BANK OF NEW YORK 

MELLON, f/k/a THE BANK OF 

NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR

THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS

CWABS, INC., ASSET-BACKED

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-6,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

SADAQAH TRUST and SAFIYYA

SHARIF,

Defendants-Appellants.

_______________________________

Submitted September 24, 2019 – Decided

Before Judges Fisher and Accurso.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, 

Chancery Division, Essex County, Docket No. F025067-15.

Safiyya Sharif, appellant pro se.

Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jones, PC, attorneys for 

respondent (Brian Yoder, on the brief).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

September 30, 2019
2

A-1178-18T2

PER CURIAM

In 2006, defendant Safiyya Sharif entered into a loan agreement for the 

purpose of buying a home in Newark; that process included defendant's

execution of a mortgage and note to secure repayment. Defendant defaulted in 

April 2009; the mortgage and note were assigned to plaintiff a few months later. 

Five years later, plaintiff served defendant with a notice of intent to foreclose 

and, in July 2015, commenced this foreclosure action. Defendant filed an 

answer, but plaintiff successfully moved for the striking of that answer as noncontesting.

In March 2017, plaintiff moved for entry of final judgment, and defendant 

filed opposition. The motion judge rejected defendant's objection to the amount 

sought, but when the matter was administratively delayed for approximately a 

year, plaintiff moved again for the entry of final judgment, and defendant again 

objected. Another motion judge found no merit in defendant's objection and 

final judgment was later entered.

Defendant appeals, arguing:

I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT 

RESPECTFULLY RECOMMEN[]DED FINAL 

JUDGMENT, WHICH FAILED TO COMPLY WITH 

THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ORDER 

DATED JUNE 9, 2011 . . . .
3

A-1178-18T2

II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT 

RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED FINAL 

JUDGMENT WHICH FAILED TO COMPLY WITH 

THE REQUIRED AFFIDAVIT OF DILIGENT 

INQUIRY FORM WITH ITS APPLICATION FOR 

FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO [RULE] 4:64-

2(d).

III. PLAINTIFF FAILED TO FILE THE REQUIRED 

AFFIDAVIT OF AMOUNTS DUE AND OWING 

SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO [RULE] 4:64-2(d).

We find defendant's arguments to be without sufficient merit to warrant further 

discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). In seeking entry of final 

judgment, plaintiff filed all appropriate sworn statements. And, in opposing the 

judgment's entry, defendant failed to dispute plaintiff's claim to the amount due, 

as recognized by Judge Jodi Lee Alper in the concise written opinion attached 

to her October 4, 2018 order.

Affirmed.