alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 2 5 , 2015

Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2015

- 0111

Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mailcode: 2822T 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

To the Members of the EPA Panel here in Kansas City, Kansas :

Good morning!

My name is Jeff Faller and I live in Platte City, Missouri . I am testifying in support of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and I hope you will consider my comments when making your decision.

For 16 y ears I have led Novozymes’ sales efforts in the biofuel industry. Novozymes provides biological products

and know

- how which enable the production process es for both grain

- based and cellulosic

- based ethanol.

Today I pose two questions to the panel :

1. Are we playing to win, that is, to hit the RFS 2 targets by using our collective ingenuity and best

efforts?

2. Or, are we just playing to play

-- g iving lip

- service to the RFS , foot

- dragging and thereby avoiding the changes that are necessary to comply with law ?

Let’s look at what t he EPA website ( http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/ ) says about the purpose of the

RFS:

“ Under the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, the RFS program was expanded in

several key ways: ”

“ EISA increased the volume of renewable fuel required to be blended into transportation fuel from 9 billion gallons in 2008 to 36 billion gallons by 2022... ”

And , “RFS2 lays the foundation for achieving sign ificant reductions of greenhouse gas emissions from the use of renewable fuels, for reducing imported petroleum, and encouraging the development and expansion of our nation's renewable fuels sector. ”

This visionary energy policy set s a path for us to fol low . It has bold

, winning aspiration s : reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce imported petroleum and encourage the development and expansion of our nations’ renewable

fuels sector. How are any of these objectives not good for America? To get to 36 billion gallons of biofuel, the

framers of the law surely envisioned that we

, as consumers, as the petroleum and biofuel industry , as auto manufacturers, and as governmental and regulatory agencies would d o things differently than we were doin g them

in 2007 when the RFS 2 was enacted. RFS 2 did not lay out all of the specifics of how we would go about achieving this winning aspiration. But the RFS 2 is clear, 36 billion gallons by 2022!

Ten years ago RFS 1 set initial targets for biofuel blen ding. Eight years ago RFS 2 set increased targets

. These targets are no surprise

. Everyone has had the opportunity to invest and commit to the targets.

In the final rule, the EPA should require obligated parties to comply with the law by blending increasing volumes of renewable fuels. Please supp ort a stable RFS. The RFS works.

Sincerely,

Jeff rey L. Faller 15802 Country Lane West Platte City, Missouri 64079
§ 3000.111 Office of Secretary and Administration. ( a ) The incumbent head of the office utilizes the title of “Secretary”.
( b ) The Office of Secretary and Administration is responsible for the Commission's budget and accounting. In this role, the Office of Secretary and Administration develops, implements, and administers the Commission's financial management system and accounting activities including those relating to the budget and the payroll; is responsible for the Commission's strategic planning; and serves as the point of contact for all Commission contracts and audits.
( c ) The Office of Secretary and Administration is responsible for the Commission's human resources and personnel. In this role, the Office of Secretary and Administration is responsible for Commission employee hiring, training, travel, personnel policy and compliance, and human capital planning. In addition, the Office of Secretary and Administration serves as an Equal Employment Opportunity Officer for the Commission and manages the Commission's continuity of operations planning.
( d ) The Office of Secretary and Administration manages the Commission's records, including the Commission's seal, administrative policies, orders, reports, and official correspondence. In this role, the Office of Secretary and Administration manages the Commission's dockets and docket room, website, reference materials, and inter-agency reporting. All orders and other actions of the Commission shall be authenticated or signed by the Secretary or any such other person as may be authorized by the Commission.
( e ) The Office of Secretary and Administration is responsible for the Commission's facilities and infrastructure. In this role, the Office of Secretary and Administration manages facility security; provides information technology and other support services essential to the efficient and effective conduct of operations; acquires and assigns office space; and manages procurement and supply.
[78 FR 27045, May 9, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 53056, Oct. 4, 2019. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALBERTSON'S
QUARTERLY REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE 13 WEEKS ENDED MAY 1, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1997
<CASH>                                          50,353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,151,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,397,828
<PP&E>                                       4,742,978
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,629,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,689,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,242,001
<BONDS>                                        784,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,133
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,046,525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,689,856
<SALES>                                      3,607,541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,607,541
<CGS>                                        2,678,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,678,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                177,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,827
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            109,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   109,266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
#### GEORGE W. LESLIE, Receiver, etc., Appellant, *v.*WILLIAM S. RUGG, Respondent.

*Agreement to pay individual debts of partner with partnership assets—when fraudulent as against creditor's.*

An agreement entered into between partners that a portion of the partnership assets shall be applied to the payment of the individual debts of one partner, the firm being at the time insolvent, is fraudulent as against creditors of the firm and may be repudiated by a receiver, thereof. *(Menagh*v. *Whitwell,*52 N. Y., 146; *Ransom*v. *Vandeventer,*41 Barb., 307; *Wilson*v. *Robertson,*21 N. Y., 587.)

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.

*C. W.*Avery, for the appellant.

*F. David,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Mullin, P. J.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
#### § 964.2 Scope of rules.

The rules in this part provide for administrative review of cases in which the Chief Postal Inspector or his delegate, acting pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3003(a), has withheld from delivery mail which he believes is involved in a scheme described in section 3003(a), and cases in which the Chief Postal Inspector or his delegate, acting pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3004, determines that letters or parcels sent in the mail are addressed to places not the residence or regular business address of the person for whom they are intended to enable the person to escape identification.

[52 FR 36763, Oct. 1, 1987, as amended at 67 FR 62179, Oct. 4, 2002]
§ 101-26.506-2 Limitations. ( a ) When furniture and furnishings requirements have been developed in connection with interior planning and design services furnished by GSA, the requesting agency shall determine that such requirements are in consonance with the criteria for acquisition of furniture and furnishings as provided in §§ 101-25.302 and 101-25.404.
( b ) Furniture and furnishings to be obtained in connection with interior planning and design services furnished by GSA shall be acquired, to the extent available, from GSA stock or through Federal Supply Schedules in accordance with the provisions of §§ 101-26.301 and 101-26.401.
[31 FR 9797, July 20, 1966, as amended at 43 FR 22211, May 24, 1978]
ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 31.1

                       Section 302 Certification

I, Steven Markowitz, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allen Organ
  Company;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
  the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
  cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
  this report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have:
   a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
      supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
      registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
      the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
   b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures and presented in this report our
      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
      and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
      report based on such evaluation; and
   c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the
      registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
  reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
  registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):
   a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
      which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
      ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
      information; and
   b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
      internal control over financial reporting.

/s/STEVEN MARKOWITZ
Steven Markowitz
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004

                                   -13-
#### § 3021.42 Due date for Postal Service response.

The statement or brief of the Postal Service, and of any other participant opposing return of the matter for further consideration, shall be filed not more than 14 days after the date for filing of petitioner's statement.
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.330 What is the second notice required before a tanker enters the safety zone or area to be avoided?

When a tanker bound for a manned deepwater port is 20 miles from entering the port's safety zone or area to be avoided, the master of the tanker must notify the port's person in charge of vessel operations of the tanker's name and location.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Special Emphasis Panel in Polar Programs (1209).                    

*Date/Time:*                         June 29-30, 2000; 8:30 am to 5 pm.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 730, Arlington, VA.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mr. Guy Guthridge, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230 Telephone: (703) 306-1033.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate Antarctic Artists and Writers Program proposals as part of the selection process for awards.                    

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

# Note: 

Closed portions are proper under Sunshine Act exemptions cited. The CMO's signature on this Notice is the required determination.

      ( print page 37807)    
Dated: June 12, 2000.

Karen J. York,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-15228  Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP98-290-008]

Take notice that on May 30, 2000, Viking Gas Transmission Company (Viking) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective July 1, 2000.

Twenty-Second Revised Sheet No. 6

Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 6A

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 6B

Viking states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the Offer of Settlement and Stipulation and Agreement (Settlement) filed by Viking on March 16, 1999 in the above-referenced docket and approved by the Commission by order issued May 12, 1999 by filing to place the Stage 2 Settlement Rates into effect in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Settlement.

Viking states that copies of this filing have been served on all parties designated on the official service list in this proceeding, on all Viking's jurisdictional customers and to affected state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14559  Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE  6717-01-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH LEE ALLEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-15094

D.C. No. 4:09-cv-00373-FRZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding

 Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Lee Allen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) action arising from the

denial of his request for information from defendants regarding President Barack

FILED

JUL 23 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-15094

Obama and “Barry Soetoro.” We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo, Cal. State Foster Parent Ass’n v. Wagner, 624 F.3d 974, 978 (9th

Cir. 2010), and we affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Allen’s FOIA claims because, even

assuming the public’s interest in disclosure was at stake, Allen failed to comply

with agency regulations requiring Allen to include the requisite third-party

authorization. See United States v. Steele (In re Steele), 799 F.2d 461, 466 (9th

Cir. 1986) (“Where no attempt to comply fully with agency procedures has been

made, the courts will assert their lack of jurisdiction under the exhaustion

doctrine.”); 6 C.F.R. § 5.3(a) (requirement that a FOIA request for information

regarding living third parties must include a written authorization signed by that

individual permitting disclosure of records); 22 C.F.R. § 171.12(a) (same).

Allen’s remaining arguments are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
§ 778.10 How does the Postal Service make efforts to accommodate intergovernmental concerns? ( a ) If a state process provides a state process recommendation to the Postal Service through its single point of contact, the Postal Service either: ( 1 ) Accepts the recommendation;
( 2 ) Reaches a mutually agreeable solution with the state process; or
( 3 ) Provides the single point of contact with such written explanation of its decision as the Postal Service in its discretion deems appropriate. The Postal Service may also supplement the written explanation by providing the explanation to the single point of contact by telephone, other telecommunication, or other means.
( b ) In any explanation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Postal Service informs the single point of contact that: ( 1 ) The Postal Service will not implement its decision for at least ten days after the single point of contact receives the explanation; or
( 2 ) The Postal Service has reviewed the decision and determined that because of unusual circumstances, the waiting period of at least ten days is not feasible.
( c ) For purposes of computing the waiting period under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a single point of contact is presumed to have received written notification 5 days after the date of mailing of such notification.