alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          34,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  407,200<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     70,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       2,370,350
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,109,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,001,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,023,452
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     611,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,001,108
<SALES>                                        143,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,198,079
<CGS>                                           84,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  948,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,545
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,934
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,055
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             75,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    75,879
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.85
<FN>
<F1>THE VALUE FOR RECEIVABLES REPRESENTS THEIR AMOUNT NET OF THEIR ALLOWANCES.
<F2>AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET EXISTS IN THE REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReliability bounds for fault-tolerant systems with competing responses to component failuresBounds are established on the probability of system failure for fault-tolerant systems of the type used, for example, in aviation control. Event series leading to system failure are assumed to follow a semi-Markov model in which the potential sojourn times associated with component failures have exponential distributions and those associated with system responses have distributions with unspecified form. A product form of the bounds is derived by using a model that provides for multiple competing system responses to component failures.Document ID19850014779Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsLee, L. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1985Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2409NASA-TP-2409L-15853Accession Number85N23090Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-34-13-40Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850014779.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Appendix 2-B: Comparison of SAM Estimated Concentrations between Non-Uniform, MultiCompartment Approach and Uniform, Single Compartment Approach

USEPA OPP found that estimated concentrations were insensitive to the use of uniform (single 

compartment) mass and flow distributions compared to non-uniform, multi-compartment 

approaches (Section 2.1.1). As a result, SAM implements the most efficient and least 

computationally intensive approach, by using uniform, single compartment mass and flow 

distributions. Comparisons for several drinking water basins are presented here for 

demonstration of the insensitivity to the two conceptualizations (non-uniform, multiple 

compartments vs. uniform, single compartment). The exact location and ID numbers of these 

drinking water basins have been omitted. 
1. Flowing Basin 1
2. Flowing Basin 2
3. Reservoir Basin 1
4. Reservoir Basin 2
§ 101-29.214 Commercial-type product. A *commercial-type product* is defined as: ( a ) Any product similar to the commercial product but modified or altered in compliance with specified Government requirements and, as such is usually sold only to the Government and not through the normal catalog or retail outlets;
( b ) Any product similar to a commercial product that is either assembled or manufactured in accordance with specifically stated Government requirements and sold only to the Government and not to the general public; or
( c ) A commercial product identified or marked differently than the commercial product normally sold to the general public.
1

Plaintiffs’ Notice Regarding Court’s October 31, 2023 Order

Plaintiffs, through undersigned counsel, respectfully submit this notice regarding the 

Court’s October 31, 2023 Order. The Order, in part, states 

Since the Parties agree that the Court lacks personal 

jurisdiction over Defendant FSI per the Order Granting 

the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 73), it is FURTHER 

ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file a stipulation of 

dismissal of all claims against Defendant FSI within 

thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.

As an initial matter, counsel apologizes for being one day late with this notice. Counsel 

represents dozens of January 6th defendants in the District of Columbia and has been consistently 

in trial or preparing for trial for months and will continue to be for several months. With a very 

small team, it has been an extraordinary challenge to keep up with deadlines in all cases. The 

lateness of this notice was in no way an intentional disregard of the Court’s Order, and counsel 

will take steps to ensure it does not happen again.

With respect to the substance of the Order, while Plaintiffs understand that the Court has 

ruled it has no personal jurisdiction over FSI, Plaintiffs respectfully disagree with that conclusion 

and intend to pursue that issue on appeal upon a final judgment by the Court (the FSI plaintiffs 

may also file a separate action against FSI in another jurisdiction). Thus, while Plaintiffs realize 

that the Court will dismiss the claims against FSI on those grounds, they are not prepared to 

voluntarily stipulate to that dismissal, so that they preserve their appellate rights on the personal 

jurisdiction issue. 

To the extent the misimpression that Plaintiffs agree there is no personal jurisdiction over 

FSI was caused by any representation by counsel, this was not intentional and counsel apologizes 

to the Court. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION

Case No. 1:22-cv-23519-KMM-LFL

PATRICK AKERLUND, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ATLAS AIR, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case 1:22-cv-23519-KMM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: November 30, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ John M. Pierce

John M. Pierce 

21550 Oxnard Street

3

rd Floor, PMB #172

Woodland Hills, CA 91367

Tel: (213) 400-0725

Email: jpierce@johnpiercelaw.com

Case 1:22-cv-23519-KMM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2023 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, John M. Pierce, hereby certify that on this day, November 30, 2023, I caused a copy of the 

foregoing document to be served on all counsel through the Court’s CM/ECF case filing system.

/s/ John M. Pierce 

John M. Pierce

Case 1:22-cv-23519-KMM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2023 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements No. 333-102601, 333-89892, 333-54836, 333-44626, 333-39366, 333-112912, 333-123979, 333-130043 and 333-152478 on Form S-8 and 333-156417 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 5, 2009, relating tothe consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc., its subsidiaries and its variable interest entities (collectively, the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of the recognition and measurement methods under Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation ofFASB statement No. 109”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008, and to the reference tous under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of the Registration Statement No. 333-156417 on Form S-3. 

/s/    Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. 

Beijing, China 

March 5, 2009
Exhibit “C”

Case 1:22-cv-23184-WPD Document 6-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2022 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-23184-WPD Document 6-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 101-30.404 Supply support.

Civilian agencies requiring supply support on an item of supply shall request this action by preparing Standard Form 1303, Request for Federal Cataloging/Supply Support Action (illustrated at § 101-30.4901-1303), and submitting the form to the General Services Administration (FRIS), Washington, DC 20406. All supply support request for nonperishable subsistence items in Federal Supply Group 89, subsistence (except condiment packets in FSC classes 8940 and 8950), shall be submitted to the Veterans Administration, Catalog Division (901S), Veterans Administration Supply Depot, P.O. Box 27, Hines IL 60141. Guidance on the preparation of supply support requests is in the GSA Handbook, Federal Catalog System-Logistics Data (FPMR 101-30.3), issued by the Commissioner, Federal Supply Service.

[46 FR 55991, Nov. 13, 1981]
#### § 101-30.101-15 Data preparation.

*Data preparation* means the conversion of item identification and management data to the appropriate Automated Data Processing (ADP) format.

[41 FR 11308, Mar. 18, 1976]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE, I, PHILIP E.
LUNDQUIST, THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF HALIFAX INTERNATIONAL, INC. (THE
"COMPANY"), HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

(1) I HAVE REVIEWED THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF THE COMPANY FOR THE ANNUAL
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 (THE "REPORT") TO WHICH THIS STATEMENT IS AN
EXHIBIT;

(2) THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13(A) OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934; AND

(3) THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL MATERIAL
RESPECTS, THE FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY.

HALIFAX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

/s/ PHILIP E. LUNDQUIST
-----------------------

NAME: PHILIP E. LUNDQUIST

TITLE: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

DATE: MAY 6, 2003
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Prevention resource guide.**
 
2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:HE 23.1210/5:
Item Number:0445-L-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001060791
 
October 1, 2018
-cr-06240-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2001 P
-cr-06240-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2001 P
#### § 62.37 Lighthouses.

Lighthouses are prominent beacons of varying size, color, and appearance employed to mark headlands, landfalls, harbor entrances, channel edges, hazards, and other features. While normally identified by their distinctive appearance, some lighthouses display diamond shaped, checkered daymarks to facilitate recognition.
ADMINISTRATION FOR 

COMMUNITY LIVING

IMPROVING THE LIVES OF OLDER ADULTS AND PEOPLE WITH 

DISABILITIES THROUGH SERVICES, RESEARCH, AND EDUCATION

WHAT IS COMMUNITY LIVING? 

OLDER ADULTS AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES HAVE THE 

SAME OPPORTUNITIES AS EVERYONE ELSE TO:

CHOOSE WHERE TO LIVE

EARN A LIVING

PARTICIPATE IN SOCIETY

MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR LIVES

WHY IS COMMUNITY LIVING IMPORTANT? 

PEOPLE 

PREFER IT

IT COSTS 

LESS

IT’S A LEGAL 

RIGHT

EVERYONE BENEFITS 

WHEN EVERYONE 

CAN CONTRIBUTE

HOW DOES ACL SUPPORT COMMUNITY LIVING?

INVESTS IN RESEARCH, 

INNOVATION, TRAINING, 

AND EDUCATION

ADVOCATES FOR 

PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 

AND OLDER ADULTS 

FUNDS SERVICES

THAT HELP PEOPLE LIVE 

INDEPENDENTLY

WHO ARE ACL’S PARTNERS?

NATIONWIDE AGING 

AND DISABILITY 

NETWORKS

STATES, TRIBES, 

AND 

COMMUNITIES

COLLEGES 

AND 

UNIVERSITIES

NONPROFIT, 

FAITH-BASED, 

AND INDUSTRY 

PARTNERS

OTHER FEDERAL 

AGENCIES
§ 334.940 Pacific Ocean in vicinity of San Pedro, Calif.; practice firing range for U.S. Army Reserve, National Guard, and Coast Guard units. ( a ) *The danger zone.* ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) *Zone B.* An area extending southwest and northwest from Point Vicente, described as follows: Beginning at Point Vicente Light, latitude 33°44′30′′, longitude 118°24′36′′; thence southwesterly to latitude 33°43′42′′, longitude 118°25′24′′; thence northwesterly to latitude 33°46′30′′, longitude 118°27′06′′; thence southeasterly to the shore, latitude 33°44′54′′, longitude 118°24′42′′; and thence southerly along the shore to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Intermittent firing may take place in the danger zone on any day from sunrise to sunset.
( 2 ) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the danger zone will be open to fishing and general navigation. When firing is not scheduled the danger zone may be occupied without restriction. When firing is in progress safety observers will be maintained to warn all vessels. Notice to vacate the area, or to stop at the boundaries, will be given by siren, patrol vessel, or other effective means, and such notice shall be promptly obeyed. All vessels permitted to enter the danger zone during a firing period, other than those owned by and operated by or under the direction of the U.S. Government, shall proceed across the area by the most direct route and clear the area with the greatest possible dispatch. No person shall enter the water and no vessel, fishing boat, or recreational craft shall anchor in the danger zone during an actual firing period.
( 3 ) Nothing in this section shall be construed as relieving the owner or person in charge of a vessel from any penalties for obstructing navigation, or for obstructing or interfering with range lights, or for not complying with the navigation laws in regard to lights and fog signals, or for otherwise violating any law or regulations.
( 4 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, Fort MacArthur, California, and such agencies as he may designate.
[19 FR 3795, June 22, 1954, as amended at 27 FR 2465, Mar. 15, 1962. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17556, Apr. 10, 1997]
§ 3021.20 The record on review. ( a ) The record on review includes: ( 1 ) The final determination;
( 2 ) The notices to persons served by the post office to be closed or consolidated;
( 3 ) The administrative record; and
( 4 ) All documents submitted in the appeal proceeding.
( b ) The record shall contain all evidence considered by the Postal Service in making its determination and shall contain no evidence not previously considered by the Postal Service.
#### § 601.110 Payment of claims.

Any claim amount determined in a final decision to be payable, less any portion previously paid, should be promptly paid to the supplier without prejudice to either party in the event of appeal or action on the claim. In the absence of appeal by the Postal Service, a board or court decision favorable in whole or in part to the supplier must be implemented promptly. In cases when only the question of entitlement has been decided and the matter of amount has been remanded to the parties for negotiation, a final decision of the contracting officer must be issued if agreement is not reached promptly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM ALBERTSON'S FORM
10-Q FOR THE 13 WEEKS ENDED MAY 4, 2000,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  FEB-01-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                     FEB-04-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAY-04-2000
<CASH>                                                      47
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              570
<ALLOWANCES>                                                30
<INVENTORY>                                              3,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         4,196
<PP&E>                                                  14,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                           5,393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          15,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    3,625
<BONDS>                                                  5,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                   423
<OTHER-SE>                                               5,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            15,388
<SALES>                                                  9,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         9,013
<CGS>                                                    6,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            6,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          83
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            294
<INCOME-TAX>                                               115
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        179
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                               179
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.42



</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 22-40742 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Kimberly Dawn Cavender, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-133-4

______________________________ Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to repres ent Kimberly Dawn Cavender has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cavender has not f iled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 27, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40742 Document: 00516728840 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/27/2023No. 22-40742

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordin gly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 22-40742 Document: 00516728840 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/27/2023