alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23210-CV-WILLIAMS

RMK MERRILL STEVENS LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANTHONY MONACO,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s Report 

and Recommendation (DE 18) (“Report”) on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and 

Post-Judgment Interest (DE 15) (“Motion”). In the Report, Magistrate Judge Reid

recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff’s Motion. (DE 18 at 1.) 

Specifically, the Report finds that Plaintiff’s counsel’s hourly attorney and paralegal rates 

are reasonable but finds the number of hours expended on certain task exceeds what is 

reasonable under the circumstances. (Id. at 5–7.) As such, the Report concludes a 15% 

reduction of the time performed by Associates from 53.59 hours to 45.59 hours. (Id. at 

9.) Taking the reduction into consideration, the Report recommends the Court award 

$19,376.75 in attorney’s fees to Plaintiff’s counsel. (Id.) Additionally, the Report 

recommends awarding Plaintiff $467.00 in costs, $3,433.92 in pre-judgment interest, and 

post-judgment interest at the rate specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). (Id. at 9–13.) No 

objections were filed to the Report, and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, upon 

an independent review of the Report, the Motion, the record, and applicable law, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

Case 1:22-cv-23210-KMW Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2024 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The Report (DE 18) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Post-Judgment Interest (DE 15) is 

GRANTED. 

3. A cost judgment should be entered against Defendant Anthony Monaco 

consisting of $19,376.75 in attorneys’ fees, $467.00 in costs, $3,433.92 in prejudgment interest, and post-judgment interest at the rate specified in 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1961(a). 

4. This case shall remain CLOSED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 31st day of January,

2024.

Case 1:22-cv-23210-KMW Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2024 Page 2 of 2
#### § 602.2 Office of Licensing, Philatelic and Retail Services Department.

In accordance with the foregoing policy, the Postal Service Office of Licensing, Philatelic and Retail Services Department, formulates the program for the management of the Postal Service's rights in intellectual property (except patents and technical data rights in Postal Service contracts, which is the responsibility of Postal Service contracting officers). The Office of Licensing and the contracting officers identify intellectual properties in which the Postal Service should secure its rights. It receives and makes recommendations for the disposition of applications for use of Postal Service intellectual property. It periodically reviews the intellectual property rights portfolio to determine the extent of the utilization of protected properties and to recommend relinquishment of ownership when it considers ownership no longer desirable. It is advised by the Office of Procurement of performance under license agreements and makes recommendations for corrective measures when necessary. In consultation with the Law Department, it recommends appropriate action against unauthorized use of intellectual property.

[56 FR 58859, Nov. 22, 1991]
§ 329.14 Determination of navigability. ( a ) *Effect on determinations.* Although conclusive determinations of navigability can be made only by federal Courts, those made by federal agencies are nevertheless accorded substantial weight by the courts. It is therefore necessary that when jurisdictional questions arise, district personnel carefully investigate those waters which may be subject to Federal regulatory jurisdiction under guidelines set out above, as the resulting determination may have substantial impact upon a judicial body. Official determinations by an agency made in the past can be revised or reversed as necessary to reflect changed rules or interpretations of the law.
( b ) *Procedures of determination.* A determination whether a waterbody is a navigable water of the United States will be made by the division engineer, and will be based on a report of findings prepared at the district level in accordance with the criteria set out in this regulation. Each report of findings will be prepared by the district engineer, accompanied by an opinion of the district counsel, and forwarded to the division engineer for final determination. Each report of findings will be based substantially on applicable portions of the format in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Suggested format of report of findings:* ( 1 ) Name of waterbody:
( 2 ) Tributary to:
( 3 ) Physical characteristics: ( i ) Type: (river, bay, slough, estuary, etc.)
( ii ) Length:
( iii ) Approximate discharge volumes: Maximum, Minimum, Mean:
( iv ) Fall per mile:
( v ) Extent of tidal influence:
( vi ) Range between ordinary high and ordinary low water:
( vii ) Description of improvements to navigation not listed in paragraph (c)(5) of this section:
( 4 ) Nature and location of significant obstructions to navigation in portions of the waterbody used or potentially capable of use in interstate commerce:
( 5 ) Authorized projects: ( i ) Nature, condition and location of any improvements made under projects authorized by Congress:
( ii ) Description of projects authorized but not constructed:
( iii ) List of known survey documents or reports describing the waterbody:
( 6 ) Past or present interstate commerce: ( i ) General types, extent, and period in time:
( ii ) Documentation if necessary:
( 7 ) Potential use for interstate commerce, if applicable: ( i ) If in natural condition:
( ii ) If improved:
( 8 ) Nature of jurisdiction known to have been exercised by Federal agencies if any:
( 9 ) State or Federal court decisions relating to navigability of the waterbody, if any:
( 10 ) Remarks:
( 11 ) Finding of navigability (with date) and recommendation for determination:
§ 955.26 Representation of the parties. ( a ) The term *appellant* means a party that has filed an appeal for resolution by the Board. An individual appellant may appear before the Board in his or her own behalf, a corporation may appear before the Board by an officer thereof, a partnership or joint venture may appear before the Board by a member thereof. Any appellant may appear before the Board by an attorney at law duly licensed in any state, commonwealth, territory of the United States, or in the District of Columbia. An attorney representing an appellant shall register in the electronic filing system, and file a notice of appearance. The notice of appearance must include an email address, mailing address, telephone number, fax number, and a jurisdiction in which the attorney is licensed to practice law.
( b ) The term *respondent* means the U.S. Postal Service. Postal Service counsel, who shall be an attorney at law licensed to practice in a state, commonwealth, or territory of the United States, or in the District of Columbia, designated by the General Counsel, will represent the interest of the Postal Service before the Board. Postal Service counsel shall register in the electronic filing system, and file a written notice of appearance with the Board. The notice of appearance must include an email address, mailing address, telephone number, fax number, and a jurisdiction in which the attorney is licensed to practice law.
( c ) References to *contractor, appellant, contracting officer, respondent and parties* shall include respective counsel for the parties, as soon as appropriate notices of appearance have been filed with the Board. A self-represented party or an attorney representing either party shall inform the Board promptly of any change in his or her email address, mailing address, telephone number, or fax number, and must enter the appropriate changes promptly in the electronic filing system.
[80 FR 31305, June 2, 2015]
## UNITED STATES ENVIRO NMENTAL PROTECTION A GENCY

OFFICE OF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT WESTERN ECOLOGY DIVI SION 200 S.W. 35TH STREET , CORVALLIS, OR 9733 3

September 10, 2014

« Address_1 » « Address_2 »

« City_ »
, « State_ » « Zip »

« GreetingLine »

I am writing to ask you for your help in understanding how residents of Oreg on feel about the protection of salmon and steelhead fish populations in the Willamette basin. In the next few days you will receive a request to participate in this project by answering questions about your thoughts and opinions on protecting salmon and steelhead fish populations in the Willamette
basin. Even if you are not familiar with salmon and steelhead populations in the Willamette basin, by taking a few m inutes to share your thoughts and opinions on this topic, you will be helping us out a great deal.

We would like to do everything we can to make it easy and enjoyable for your to participate in this study. I am writing in advance because many people like to know ahead of time that they will be asked to fill out a survey . This research can only be successful with the generous help of people like you.

The survey should take about 20

– 30 minutes to complete. We cannot send the survey to

everyone, so your a nswers will represent the opinions of other Oregon residents who are similar to you and your household. I hope that you can find this amount of time to help with our project. Most of all, I hope that you enjoy the survey and the opportunity to voice your thoughts and opinions on this important subject.

Best wishes,

Dr. Michael Papenfus United States Environmental Protection Agency
§ 501.20 Discontinued Postage Evidencing Indicia. ( a ) *Decertified indicia* (evidence of pre-paid postage) are indicia that have been withdrawn by the Postal Service as valid forms of postage evidence through publication by the Postal Service in the Federal Register, or by voluntary withdrawal undertaken by the provider.
( b ) Effective December 31, 2024 all Postage Evidencing Systems that do not to produce Intelligent Mail Indicia (IMI) for evidence of pre-paid postage must be withdrawn from service. Non-IMI indicia, which are not compliant with the then-current version of the IMI-PC, will be decertified and may not be used as a valid form of postage evidence. These decertified indicia may not be recognized as valid postage for use or refunds, after June 30, 2025.
[78 FR 8407, Feb. 6, 2013, as amended at 85 FR 78235, Dec. 4, 2020; 85 FR 79432, Dec. 10, 2020]
#### § 960.15 Reply.

Within 15 days after service of an answer, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the applicant shall include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 960.19.
APPENDIX: LIST OF AMICI

The amici listed below join this brief as individuals; institutional affiliation is noted for 

informational purposes only and does not indicate endorsement by institutional employers 

of the positions advocated in this brief. 

Donald B. Ayer served as Deputy Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice 

(“DOJ”) from 1989 to 1990, Principal Deputy Solicitor General of the United States from 

1986 to 1989; and U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California from 1981 to 1986. 

He has argued nineteen cases in the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Gregory A. Brower has served as Assistant Director for the Office of Congressional 

Affairs at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada, 

and as both General Counsel and Inspector General at the U.S. Government Publishing 

Office. He also served five regular sessions in the Nevada Legislature, including as Chair 

of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2015. 

John J. Farmer Jr. has served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney, New Jersey Attorney 

General, Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission, and Dean of Rutgers Law School, and 

now serves as Director of the Eagleton Institute of Politics. He has also served on New 

Jersey’s Executive Commission on Ethical Standards, Advisory Committee on Judicial 

Conduct, and the State Commission of Investigations. 

Stuart M. Gerson served as Acting Attorney General of the United States during the early 

Clinton Administration. He also served as President George H.W. Bush’s appointee as 

Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the DOJ, as an advisor to several 

presidents, and as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia from 1972 to 

1975. 

Peter D. Keisler served as Acting Attorney General of the United States during the George 

W. Bush Administration. He served as Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ’s Civil 

Division from 2003 until 2007, as Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General and Acting 

Associate Attorney General from 2002 to 2003, and as Assistant and Associate Counsel to 

President Ronald Reagan in the Office of White House Counsel from 1986 to 1988. 

William F. Weld served as the U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts from 1981 to 1986, as 

Assistant U.S. Attorney General in charge of the DOJ’s Criminal Division from 1986 to 

1988, and as Governor of Massachusetts from 1991 until 1997. 

Christine Todd Whitman served as Governor of New Jersey from 1994 to 2001 and as 

Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from 2001 to 2003 during the 

George W. Bush Administration. She serves on a number of non-profit boards including 

the Board of Trustees’ Executive Committee of the Eisenhower Fellowships and the Board 

of Directors of the Council on Foreign Relations. 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 41-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4957 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4957

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
 extend the legislative authority for the Black Patriots Foundation to 
                    establish a commemorative work.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4957

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to 
 extend the legislative authority for the Black Patriots Foundation to 
                    establish a commemorative work.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 506 of the 
Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (40 U.S.C. 1003 
note; 110 Stat. 4155) is amended by striking ``2000'' and inserting 
``2005''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
-cr-06240-WPD Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2001 P
-cr-06240-WPD Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2001 P
§ 81.18 Notice and record of certification of vessels of special construction or purpose. ( a ) In accordance with 33 U.S.C. 1605(c), a notice is published in the Federal Register of the following: ( 1 ) Each Certificate of Alternative Compliance issued under § 81.9; and
( 2 ) Each Coast Guard vessel determined by the Commandant to be a vessel of special construction or purpose.
( b ) Copies of Certificate of Alternative Compliance and documentation concerning Coast Guard vessels are available for inspection at Marine Transportation Systems Directorate, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, (CG-5PW), Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.
( c ) The owner or operator of a vessel issued a Certificate shall ensure that the vessel does not operate unless the Certificate of Alternative Compliance or a certified copy of that Certificate is on board the vessel and available for inspection by Coast Guard personnel.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1625-0019) [CGD 77-136, 47 FR 13800, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended by CGD 88-052, 53 FR 25119, July 1, 1988; CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33663, June 28, 1996; CGD 78-82, 43 FR 54186, Nov. 20, 1978; USCG-2006-25150, 71 FR 39208, July 12, 2006; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38431, July 7, 2014]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0066

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL JOSEPH MCCOY,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until October 7, 2021, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 2 2021

09/02/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0066
#### § 955.29 Decisions.

Decisions of the Board will be made in writing and sent to both parties through the electronic filing system, or otherwise as appropriate. The rules of the Board and all final orders and decisions shall be open for public inspection at the offices of the Board, and may be made available on its official Web site and to commercial publishers. Decisions of the Board will be made solely upon the record, as described in § 955.14.

[74 FR 20592, May 5, 2009, as amended at 80 FR 31305, June 2, 2015]
#### § 3060.23 Identified property and equipment assets report.

The Postal Service shall file an Identified Property and Equipment Assets Report in the form and content of Table 3, below.

Table 3—Competitive Products Property and Equipment Assets—PRC Form CP-03

[$ in 000s]

| Finance No. | Finance location | Asset identifier | Asset description | Cost | Accumulated depreciation | Net book value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total | | | | $x,xxx | $x,xxx | $x,xxx |
#### § 6.01-8 Cyber incident.

*Cyber incident,* as used in this part, has the meaning ascribed to an “incident” under 44 U.S.C. 3552(b)(2).

[E.O. 14116, 89 FR 13971, Feb. 26, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual Report of Caprock  Canyon  Investments,
Inc.,  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  September  30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2005


/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
CEO, CFO, Chairman, Secretary, Director
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61906-CIV-ALTONAGA/Strauss

EMMITT BERNIE LAWSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting 

Commissioner of Social Security

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss’s May 18, 2023 

Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 29], wherein Judge Strauss recommends the Court grant 

Defendant, Kilolo Kijakazi’s Opposed Motion for Entry of Judgment . . . With Reversal and 

Remand of the Cause to Defendant [ECF No. 22]. The parties were advised they had 14 days to 

file objections to the Report (see Report 6), and no objections have been received. The Court 

agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and recommendation. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report [ECF No. 29] is AFFIRMED, and 

Defendant’s Opposed Motion for Entry of Judgment . . . and Remand of the Cause to Defendant 

[ECF No. 22] is GRANTED. The case is remanded to the Acting Commissioner of Social 

Security for further proceedings consistent with the Report. Specifically, remand is limited to 

consideration of whether Plaintiff’s chauffeur job was substantial gainful activity and if it was, 

whether Plaintiff can perform the job based on his RFC (which turns on whether Plaintiff has a 

sitting limitation). (See id. 6). Final Judgment shall issue separately.

Case 0:22-cv-61906-CMA Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-61906-CIV-ALTONAGA/Strauss

2

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 2nd day of June, 2023.

 _______________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 0:22-cv-61906-CMA Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2023 Page 2 of 2