alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Sento Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Patrick F. O’ Neal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Patrick F. O’ Neal |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Patrick  F. O’ Neal     |
| Chief  Executive Officer     |
| August  20, 2004             |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Argued and submitted January 19,

remanded in part; otherwise affirmed February 15, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of Cindy Lynn COLLEY, nka Cindy Lynn Clair, *Appellant, and*James Edward COLLEY, *Respondent.*

(15-90-02757; CA A83090)

889 P2d 1355

Laura Graser argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Richard D. Curtis argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Curtis and Strickland.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*115PER CURIAM

Mother appeals an order modifying the dissolution judgment to award custody of the children to father and awarding child support. We review *de*novo, ORS 19.125(3), and remand to delete the child support award.

A lengthy recitation of the facts would not be of assistance in this case. Suffice it to say that, in the original dissolution judgment, the parties were awarded joint custody of their two minor children. Father moved for modification, seeking an award of custody to him. Mother agrees that circumstances have changed and that joint custody is no longer feasible. She seeks an award of custody to her. We have independently reviewed the record and have disregarded the trial court’s inappropriate comments and its determination regarding mother’s credibility. We find that both parents are loving and caring and can provide a nurturing home for the children. We conclude that the award of custody to father is appropriate.

The trial court’s custody and visitation determination results in the children being with mother 43 percent of the time and with father 57 percent. The parties concede that the award of child support to father was in error, because the court failed to apply the shared custody provisions of the child support guidelines. Under the correct calculations, mother is not obligated to pay support.

Remanded for entry of modified judgment deleting child support award; otherwise affirmed. Costs to wife.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37481-37482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15036]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 8883]
RIN 1545-AW53


Guidance Under Section 1032 Relating to the Treatment of a 
Disposition by an Acquiring Entity of the Stock of a Corporation in a 
Taxable Transaction; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to Treasury Decision 8883, 
which was published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, May 16, 2000 
(65 FR 31073), which provides guidance under section 1032 of the 
Internal Revenue Code, relating to the treatment of a disposition by an 
acquiring entity of the stock of a corporation in a taxable 
transaction.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective May 16, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Filiz Serbes at (202) 622-7550 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject to correction are under 
section 1032 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, Treasury Decision 8883 contains an error which may 
prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 8883), 
which was the subject of FR Doc. 00-11900, is corrected as follows:


Sec. 1.1032-3  [Corrected]

    On page 31076, column 3, Sec. 1.1032-3(c)(1), is corrected to read 
as follows:

[[Page 37482]]

Sec. 1.1032-3  Disposition of stock or stock options in certain 
transactions not qualifying under any other nonrecognition provision.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) The acquiring entity acquires stock of the issuing corporation 
directly or indirectly from the issuing corporation in a transaction in 
which, but for this section, the basis of the stock of the issuing 
corporation in the hands of the acquiring entity would be determined, 
in whole or in part, with respect to the issuing corporation's basis in 
the issuing corporation's stock under section 362(a) or 723 (provided 
that, in the case of an indirect acquisition by the acquiring entity, 
the transfers of issuing corporation stock through intermediate 
entities occur immediately after one another);
* * * * *

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 00-15036 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALASKA
AIRLINES INC. THIRD QUARTER 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         137,400
<SECURITIES>                                   245,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               723,000
<PP&E>                                       1,982,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 499,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,250,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          855,800
<BONDS>                                        406,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     627,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,252,000
<SALES>                                      1,320,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,320,000
<CGS>                                        1,293,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,293,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (56,900)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

APRIL BOTT MOORE,

Appellant,

v.

ROBERT DEAN MOORE,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-2780

[December 7, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Janet C. Croom, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312022CA000360.

James S. Toscano and Rebecca E. Rhoden of Lowndes, Drosdick, 

Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Robert W. Thielhelm and Cailey M. Marsh of Baker & Hostetler LLP, 

Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Richard B. Abshire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard B. Abshire


Richard B. Abshire


Chief Financial Officer





Date: August 12, 2010
































This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

February 8, 2005


Aceto Corporation
Lake Success, New York

RE:     Registration Statements (No. 33-38679, No. 333-90929 and No. 333-110653)
        on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated February 8, 2005 related to our
review of interim financial information for the three-month and six-month
periods ended December 31, 2004.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such report
is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


Melville, New York                                      /s/ KPMG LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5246 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5246

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require home health 
  agencies participating in the Medicare Program to conduct criminal 
  background checks for all applicants for employment as patient care 
                               providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2000

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require home health 
  agencies participating in the Medicare Program to conduct criminal 
  background checks for all applicants for employment as patient care 
                               providers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING MEDICARE HOME HEALTH AGENCIES TO CONDUCT CRIMINAL 
              BACKGROUND CHECKS ON ALL APPLICANTS FOR EMPLOYMENT AS 
              PATIENT CARE PROVIDERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1891(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395bbb(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(7) The agency submits to the Attorney General a criminal 
        background request described in section 124(a) of the 
        Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary and 
        Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in 
        section 101(b) of division A of Public Law 105-277) for each 
        applicant for employment in a position involved in direct 
        patient care.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to applications for employment made on or after 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = EWR

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2012 (History & Current)

02/23/2015 07:56:22

Query Parameters:
02/23/2015 07:56:22

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2012 (History & Current)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 32 

ACA AIR CANADA 19

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 2

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

ASH MESA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4 

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6

CAA ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES (code 6

CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 4

CKS KALITTA FLYING SERVICES (AMERICAN INT'L 2 

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 13

CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 7

CSQ IBC AIRWAYS 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 33

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 9

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 1

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

FDX FED EX 8

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 34

JZA AIR CANADA JAZZ 4

PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 8

POE PORTER AIRLINES 22

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWA SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 35

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 2

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 907

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 2

USA US AIRWAYS 19

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

WJA WESTJET 1

Page 2
<PAGE>


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


              KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That each of the undersigned
directors of Sabine River Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation ("Sabine"),
hereby constitutes and appoints William E. Hantke and Jeffry N. Quinn, and each
of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to
act without the others, to sign Sabine's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; to file
such Annual Report and the exhibits thereto and any and all other documents in
connection therewith, including without limitation amendments thereto, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission; and to do and perform any and all other acts
and things requisite and necessary to be done in connection with the foregoing
as fully as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Signature                                Title                                  Date
         ---------                                -----                                  ----
<S>                                 <C>                                             <C>
/s/ Thomas D. O'Malley
---------------------------          Chairman of the Board, President and Chief      March 18, 2002
    Thomas D. O'Malley               Executive Officer (principal executive
                                     officer)
/s/ Stephen I. Chazen
---------------------------          Director                                        March 18, 2002
    Stephen I. Chazen

/s/ David I. Foley
---------------------------          Director                                        March 18, 2002
    David I. Foley

/s/ Robert L. Friedman
---------------------------          Director                                        March 18, 2002
    Robert L. Friedman

/s/ William E. Haynes
---------------------------          Director                                        March 18, 2002
    William E. Haynes

</TABLE>
§ 3021.1 Definitions. The following definitions apply in this part: ( a ) *Final determination* means the written determination and findings required by 39 U.S.C. 404(d)(3).
( b ) *Petitioner* means a person who files a Petition for Review.
( c ) *Petition for Review* means a written document that the Commission accepts as an appeal of a post office closing or consolidation.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA cockpit-display concept for executing a multiple glide-slope approach for wake-vortex avoidanceA piloted simulation study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of utilizing a forward-looking display to provide information that would enable aircraft to rredue their in-trail separation interval, and hence increase airport capacity, through the application of multiple glide-path approach techniques. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether information could be satisfactorily provided on a head-up display (HUD) format to permit the pilot to conduct a multiple glide-slope approach while maintaining a prespecified in-trail separation interval. The tests were conducted in a motion-base cockpit simulator configured as a current-generation transport aircraft and included dynamic effects of the vortices generated by the lead aircraft. The information provided on the HUD included typical aircraft guidance information and the current and past positions of the lead aircraft. Additionally, the displayed information provided self-separation cues that allowed the pilot to maintain separation on the lead aircraft. Performance data and pilot subjective ratings and comments were obtained during the tests. The results of this study indicate that multiple glide-slope approaches, procedurally designed for vortex avoidance, are possible while maintaining pilot work load and performance within operationally acceptable limits. In general, it would seem that multiple glide-slope approaches are possible even under reduced in-trail separation conditions if the pilot is provided with adequate situational information.Document ID19850008560Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsAbbott, T. S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1984Subject CategoryAircraft InstrumentationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2386L-15852NASA-TP-2386Accession Number85N16869Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-35-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850008560.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit



EXHIBIT  10.3





Schedule 1, amended and restated as of October 30, 2019, to the Third Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2018, among Laredo Petroleum, Inc., as borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Laredo Midstream Services, LLC and Garden City Minerals, LLC, as guarantors and the banks signatory thereto.




SCHEDULE 1
	
				
	Bank
	Maximum Credit
 Amount
	Elected Commitment
	Commitment Percentage

	Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
	$191,666,666.67
	 $95,833,333.34
	9.583%

	Bank of America, N.A.
	$166,666,666.66
	 $83,333,333.32
	8.333%

	BMO Harris Financing, Inc.
	$166,666,666.66
	 $83,333,333.32
	8.333%

	Capital One, National Association
	$166,666,666.66
	 $83,333,333.32
	8.333%

	The Bank of Nova Scotia, Houston Branch
	$141,666,666.66
	 $70,833,333.32
	7.083%

	Societe Generale
	$141,666,666.66
	 $70,833,333.32
	7.083%

	ABN AMRO Capital USA LLC
	$116,666,666.66
	 $58,333,333.34
	5.833%

	Barclays Bank PLC
	$116,666,666.66
	 $58,333,333.34
	5.833%

	BOKF, NA DBA Bank of Oklahoma
	$116,666,666.66
	 $58,333,333.34
	5.833%

	Branch Banking and Trust Company
	$116,666,666.66
	 $58,333,333.34
	5.833%

	Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch
	$116,666,666.66
	 $58,333,333.34
	5.833%

	Citibank, N.A.
	$116,666,666.66
	 $58,333,333.34
	5.833%

	Compass Bank
	$116,666,666.66
	 $58,333,333.34
	5.833%

	Goldman Sachs Bank USA
	$116,666,666.66
	 $58,333,333.34
	5.833%

	Comerica Bank
	$91,666,666.66
	 $45,833,333.34
	4.583%

	Totals:
	$2,000,000,000.00
	$1,000,000,000.00
	100.00%






	
		
	Administrative Agent
	Address for Notice

	Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
	Credit Contact:
1445 Ross Ave., Suite 4500, T9216-451
Dallas, TX 75202
Attn:      Muhammad A. Dhamani
Tel:        214-721-6430
Email:   Muhammad.dhamani@wellsfargo.com


Primary Operations Contact:
1525 W WT Harris Blvd, 1st Floor
Charlotte, NC 28262-8522
MAC D1109-019
Attn:      Agency Services
Tel:       704-590-2706
Fax:      704-590-2782