alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Search Help More Searc

EERE Information Center

Commercial Unitary Air 

Conditioners and Heat Pumps 

Advance Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (ANOPR) Public 

Meeting 

Purpose: This public meeting gave the Department of Energy an 

opportunity to present its methodology and the results of the 

ANOPR analyses, and to answer questions to help participants 

prepare their written comments. This meeting also allowed the 

Department to explain its plans for the remaining analyses—the 

analyses supporting the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking —and to 

seek input from stakeholders on its planned methodologies, 

assumptions, and data sources. 

Public Meeting Materials: 

Meeting Agenda (PDF 115 KB) 

Presentations: 

z Rulemaking Overview (PDF 138 KB) 

z Engineering Analysis (PDF 278 KB) 

z Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (PDF 272 KB) 

z National Impact Analysis (PDF 216 KB) 

z NOPR Analyses and Next Steps (PDF 238 KB) 

To see the transcript from this meeting, you can visit the Building 

Technologies Program's Reading Room, between 9:00am and 

4:00pm, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, at: 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Forrestal Building 

Room 1J-018 

DATE: September 30, 2004 

TIME: 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. EDT 

LOCATION: U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue 

SW 

Room 1E-245 

Washington, DC 20585 

 EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 24C
1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 

Phone: (202) 586-9127 

To obtain a copy of the transcript from this meeting, please 

contact: 

Neal R. Gross 

Court Reporters and Transcribers 

1323 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20005-3701 

Phone: (202) 234-4433 

Printable Version

Webmaster | Security & Privacy | Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home

U.S. Department of Energy 

Content Last Updated: 10/13/2004 

 EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 24C
ALLEN ORGAN COMPANY

Exhibit 32

                 Section 1350 Certifications


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Allen Organ
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350 as adopted pursuant to  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and
2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
  in all material respects, the financial condition and result
  of operations of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2004



/s/STEVEN MARKOWITZ             /s/NATHAN S. ECKHART
Steven Markowitz                Nathan S. Eckhart
Chief Executive Officer         Chief Financial Officer
§ 775.8 Environmental evaluation guidelines. ( a ) *Approach.* When dealing with proposals which may have an impact on the human environment, environmental coordinators, planners, decision makers, and other officials responsible for actions, will, as appropriate: ( 1 ) Use a systematic approach that integrates natural and social sciences and environmental design in planning and making decisions.
( 2 ) Identify environmental effects and values in detail, and appraise them in conjunction with economic and technical analyses.
( 3 ) Consider environmental documents at all decision points at which other planning documents are considered. (Plans and decisions are to reflect environmental values. Proposed actions should be assessed as soon as their effects can be meaningfully evaluated, to provide the bases for early decision on whether detailed environmental impact statements must be prepared.)
( 4 ) Study, develop, describe, and evaluate at all decision points, reasonable alternatives to recommended actions which may have a significant effect on the environment.
( b ) *Proposal requirements.* When an environmental impact statement has been prepared, it must accompany the proposal through and be used in the decision-making process. Any other proposal must refer to applicable environmental documents (e.g., determination of categorical exclusion; finding of no significant impact; notice of intent to prepare an impact statement), and relevant comments and responses.
( c ) *Lead agency arrangements.* If the Postal Service and another Federal agency become involved in a lead agency arrangement for the preparation of an environmental impact statement, the Service will cooperate fully.
[44 FR 63525, Nov. 5, 1979. Redesignated at 63 FR 45719, Aug. 27, 1998]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SUTTER HOLDING COMPANY,
INC. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, R. Michael Collins, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ R. Michael Collins
--------------------------------------
R. Michael Collins
President and Chief Executive Officer of
Sutter Holding Company, Inc.

April 14, 2005
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthome Street San Francisco, CA 94105



## AUG 2 3 

## 2011
Mr. James Goldstene Executive Officer California AirResource Board 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, California 95812 Re: Completeness Finding for the "8-Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revisions and Technical Revisions to the PM2.5 State Implementation Plan Transportation Conformity Budgets for t South Coast and SanJoaquin Valley Air Basins," adopted July 21,2011

On July 29,2011, you submitted a package ofmaterials containing a revision to the California State Implementation Plan for achieving and maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for 1997 8-Hour Ozone and 1997 PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards. This revision consists of revisions to the California SIP for the South Coast and San Joaquin Valley 8-hourozone and PM2.5 nonattainment areas. We have reviewed this package for completeness and found that it conforms to the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. Ifyou have any questions regarding our review, please call me orhave your staffcontact Lisa Hanf, Chiefofthe Planning Office, at (415) 972-3854, hanf.lisa@epa.gov. Sincerely,

Deborah Jordan Director, Air Division

cc: Douglas Ito, California Air Resources Board
#### ELAM LOOMIS, Respondent, *v.*LeROY MOWRY and others, Appellants.

*Search for written*instrument— *necessa/ry to enable party to give parol pn'oof of its contents*— *cross-examination of witness.*

This action was brought to recover damages for the alleged conversion of a note. The complaint charged that in September, 1870, the plaintiff made a note for $534, payable to one Sanborn, who is alleged to have indorsed it. It is then alleged that the note was received by the defendants upon the agreement that it should be returned to the plaintiff before maturity; that it matured December - 4, -1870; that the defendants did not return it, but before maturity sold and converted it.

The question on this appeal is raised by exceptions taken to refusals of the court below to allow a cross-examination of a witness upon the question whether he had made proper search for a written instrument, as to the contents of which parol evidence was given on the trial. The court at General Term *held,*that such refusal was error, and reversed the judgment and granted a new trial, costs to abide the event.

*U. G. Paris,*for the appellants.

*Hughes & Northrup,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

James, J.

Present—Learned, P. J., Boardman and J ames, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial .granted, costs to abide event.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. DARNELL BASON, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 1 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 11th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14900]



[[Page 37114]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1101]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; Imation Corporation (Data 
Storage Products); Camarillo, CA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the Oxnard Harbor District, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 
205, has made application to the Board for authority to establish a 
special-purpose subzone at the data storage manufacturing and 
warehousing facilities of the Imation Corporation, located in 
Camarillo, California (FTZ Docket 63-99, filed 11/24/99);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (64 FR 67844, 12/3/99); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status at the data storage manufacturing and warehousing facilities of 
the Imation Corporation, located in Camarillo, California (Subzone 
205A), at the location described in the application, and subject to the 
FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of June 2000.
Troy H. Cribb,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14900 Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Broadband fan noise prediction system for turbofan engines
 
pt 1| pt2 | pt 3
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:2010-216898
Item Number:0830-D (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000821150 
November 2, 2018
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip DeZwirek, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Phillip DeZwirek                             
|Phillip DeZwirek                                 
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
|May 15, 2007                                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CECO Environmental
Corp. and will be retained by CECO Environmental Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 3055.25 Nonpostal Products. ( a ) For each product that is a nonpostal service authorized pursuant to 39 U.S.C. chapter 37, the Postal Service shall report the measure of the quality of service.
( b ) If practicable, quantitative measurement (such as on-time service performance) along with identification of the underling metric(s) shall be provided. If quantitative measurement is not practicable, the Postal Service shall so state, explain why it is not practicable, and provide qualitative analysis.
( c ) For the Postal Service's program to provide property and nonpostal service to other Government agencies under 39 U.S.C. 3704, the Postal Service shall report the quality of service for the program as a whole.
( d ) The effective date of this section is October 1, 2023.
[88 FR 10040, Feb. 16, 2023]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 20, 2022

No. 04-21-00536-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.N.A.T, A.S.A.T., S.G.A.T., Children,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI02828

Honorable Nick Catoe Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due to be filed with this court on January 3, 2022. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 35.1(c). On December 29, 2021, the Bexar County District Clerk notified this court that 

Appellant has not paid the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and Appellant is not entitled to a 

free clerk’s record.

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the 

date of this order that (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay 

the clerk’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. See id. R. 

20.1.

If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed for want of 

prosecution without further notice. See id. R. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of January, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### § 958.20 Service.

If both parties are participating in the electronic filing system, separate service upon the opposing party is not required. Otherwise, documents shall be served personally or by mail on the opposing party, noting on the document filed, or on the transmitting letter, that a copy has been so furnished.

[81 FR 40194, June 21, 2016]
F2002-00520

DRAFT

AGENDA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON A RULEMAKING TO CONSIDER

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS

FOR COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS

PLACE OF WORKSHOP: FORRESTAL BUILDING

1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW

ROOM 1E-245

WASHINGTON, DC 20585

TELEPHIONE: 202-586-9127

TELEFAX: 202-586-4617

DATE AND TIME: MONDAY, OCTOBER 1, 2001

9::0 A.M. - 5:00 P.M.

PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP

The purpose of this public workshop is to hear the views of interested

persons on the issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider

updated energy efficiency standards for commercial unitary air conditioners

and heat pumps. The Department will consider the views presented and

comments submitted in formulating its approach in the rulemaking.

I. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS

I1. AGENDA REVIEW

III. COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS -

TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION

A. Introduction

B. Market and Technology Assessment

C. Screening Analysis

D. Engineering Analysis

1. Equipment Efficiency and Cost Analysis

2. Building Energy Use and Electric Load Shape Characterization

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02BB

F2002-00520 

DRAFT 

AGENDA 

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY 

PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON A RULEMAKI~G TO CONSIDER 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS 

FOR COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS 

PLACE OF WORKSHOP: 

DATE AND TIME: 

PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP 

FORRESTAL BUILDING 

1000 INDEPEl'\DENCE A VENUE, SW 

ROOM lE-245 

WASHIl'\GTON, DC 20585 

TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127 

TELEFAX: 202-586-4617 

MONDA Y, OCTOBER 1,2001 

9:(:0 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. 

The purpose of this public workshop is to hear the views of interested 

persons on the issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider 

updated energy efficiency standards for commercial unitary air conditioners 

and heat pumps. The Department will consider the views presented and 

comments submitted in formulating its approach in the rulcmaking. 

I. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS 

II. AGENDA REVIEW 

III. COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUl\'1PS -

TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION 

A. Introduction 

B. Market and Technology Assessment 

C. Screening Analysis 

D. Engineering Analysis 

1. Equipment Efficiency and Cost Analysis 

2. Building Energy Use and Electric Load Shape Characterization 
E. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

F. Consumer Sub-group Analysis

G. National Energy Savings and Net Present Value Analysis

H. Manufacturer Impact Analysis

I. Employment Impact Analysis

J. Utility Impact Analysis

K. Environmental Impact Analysis

IV. ADJOLURNMENT

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02BB

E. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis 

F. Consumer Sub-group Analysis 

G. National Energy Savings and Net Present Value Analysis 

H. Manufacturer Impact Analysis 

I. Employment Impact Analysis 

J. Utility Impact Analysis 

K. Environmental Impact Analysis 

IV. ADJOLRNMENT
§ 959.23 Decisions. ( a ) *Oral decisions.* The presiding officer may, in his or her discretion, render an oral decision (an initial decision by an Administrative Law Judge, or a tentative or final decision by the Judicial Officer) at the close of the hearing. A party who desires an oral decision shall notify the presiding officer and the opposing party at least 5 days prior to the date set for the hearing. Either party may submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law either orally or in writing at the conclusion of the hearing.
( b ) *Written initial decision by Administrative Law Judge.* A written initial decision shall be rendered with all due speed. The initial decision shall include findings of fact and conclusions of law, with the reasons therefor, upon all the material issues of fact or law presented on the record, and an appropriate order. The initial decision shall become the final decision of the Postal Service unless an appeal is taken in accordance with § 959.24.
( c ) *Written tentative or final decision by the Judicial Officer.* When the Judicial Officer presides at the hearing, he or she shall issue a final or a tentative decision. Such decision shall include findings of fact and conclusions of law, with the reasons therefor, upon all the material issues of fact or law presented on the record, and appropriate order. The tentative decision shall become the final decision of the Postal Service unless exceptions are filed in accordance with § 959.24.
[39 FR 33213, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended at 63 FR 66052, Dec. 1, 1998]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

December 3, 2004

Albertson's, Inc.
Boise, Idaho

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial
information of Albertson's, Inc. and subsidiaries for the thirteen and
thirty-nine week periods ended October 28, 2004 and October 30, 2003, as
indicated in our report dated December 2, 2004; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods
ended October 28, 2004, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 33-54998 and 333-113995 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos.
2-80776, 33-2139, 33-7901, 33-15062, 33-43635, 33-62799, 33-59803, 333-82157,
333-82161, 333-87773 and 333-73194 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/S/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
------------------------
Boise, Idaho
§ 3040.181 Supporting justification for material changes to product descriptions. ( a ) Supporting justification for changes to a product description in the Mail Classification Schedule shall include a description of, and rationale for, the proposed changes to the product description; and the additional material in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) As to market dominant products, explain why the changes are not inconsistent with the policies and the applicable criteria of chapter 36 of title 39 of the United States Code, the applicable requirements of this part, and any applicable Commission directives and orders; or
( 2 ) As to competitive products, explain why the changes will not result in the violation of any of the standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and part 3035 of this chapter.
( c ) Describe the likely impact that the changes will have on users of the product and on competitors.
[80 FR 35575, June 22, 2015. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 9615, 9658, Feb. 19, 2020; 85 FR 81138, Dec. 15, 2020]
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5016

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 18 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Received

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 514 Express Center Road in Chicago,

Illinois, as the ‘‘J.T. Weeker Service Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 5016 RDS

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 514 Express Center Road in Chicago, Illinois, and

4 known as the Chicago International/Military Service Cen5 ter, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J.T. Weeker

6 Service Center’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the ‘‘J.T. Weeker Service Center’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 17,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.