alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 101-30.000 Scope of part.

This part provides for a Federal Catalog System by which items of supply under § 101-30.301 are uniformly named, described, classified, and assigned national stock numbers (NSN's) to aid in managing all logistical functions and operations from determination of requirements through disposal. This system provides a standard reference language or terminology to be used by personnel in managing these items of supply, a prerequisite for integrated item management under the Federal procurement system concept.

[46 FR 35644, July 10, 1981]
National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of International Policy, Fuel Economy, 

and Consumer Programs

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

U.S. Department of Transportation

EPA-420-D-15-002

June 2015

Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards 

for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2

Proposed Rule

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

and

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 

U.S. Department of Transportation
Exhibit 31.2  Certification Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  I, Janet L. Crance, Chief Accounting Officer of Health Enhancement Products, Inc. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.     Date: April 13, 2007 /s/ Janet L. Crance Janet L. Crance Chief Accounting Officer
§ 958.7 Hearing location. An oral hearing under this part shall be held: ( a ) In the judicial district of the United States in which the respondent resides or transacts business;
( b ) In the judicial district of the United States in which the incident or incidents occurred upon which the determination of liability under 39 U.S.C. 3018 was made by the Determining Official; or
( c ) In such other place as may be determined by the Presiding Officer.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, R. Keith Guelpa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|By:  /s/ R. Keith Guelpa
|R. Keith Guelpa         
|Chief Executive Officer 
|October 29, 2010
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-45456,  333-63626 and 333-90580) pertaining to the 1995 Stock
Option Plan,  1997 Stock Option Plan,  2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the
2001  Nonstatutory  Stock Option Plan of Virage,  Inc. of our report dated April
18, 2003, with respect to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of
Virage,  Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March
31, 2003.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
June 16, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Sweetwater  Investing,  Inc. on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003,  as filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00308-CR

Gary Ace AVANT,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004-CR-8479

Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 18, 208

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence on February 29, 2008. Because appellant did not file a

motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on March 31, 2008. TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on April 15, 2008.

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant mailed his notice of appeal on April 21, 2008, and it was, in turn,

filed on May 8, 2008. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time. 
04-08-00308-CR

-2-

We therefore ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s attorney has responded that this court does lack

jurisdiction over this appeal, and that if Avant wishes to pursue his appeal, he will need to file an

application for writ of habeas corpus requesting an out-of-time appeal. Thus, we dismiss this appeal

for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4817 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4817

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide that annuities 
 paid by States to blind veterans shall be disregarded in determining 
                 supplemental security income benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2000

 Mr. Reynolds introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide that annuities 
 paid by States to blind veterans shall be disregarded in determining 
                 supplemental security income benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATE ANNUITIES FOR BLIND VETERANS TO BE DISREGARDED IN 
              DETERMINING SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS.

    (a) Income Disregard.--Section 1612(b) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1382a(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (21);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (22) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(23) any annuity paid by a State to the individual (or 
        such spouse) on the basis of the individual being a veteran (as 
        defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code) who is 
        blind.''.
    (b) Resource Disregard.--Section 1613(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1382b(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (12);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (13) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (13) the following:
            ``(14) for the month of receipt and every month thereafter, 
        any annuity paid by a State to the individual (or such spouse) 
        on the basis of the individual being a veteran (as defined in 
        section 101 of title 38, United States Code) who is blind.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to benefits paid for months beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37405-37406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14920]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Meeting

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary is 
announcing a public meeting of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public 
Advisory Group and a joint public hearing with the Exxon Valdez Oil 
Spill Trustee Council.

DATES: The public hearing is July 19, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. and the public 
meeting is July 20 at 8:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Fourth floor conference room, 645 ``G'' Street, Anchorage, 
Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Mutter, Department of the 
Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 1689 ``C'' 
Street, Suite 119, Anchorage, Alaska, (907) 271-5011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Advisory Group was created by 
Paragraph V.A.4 of the Memorandum of

[[Page 37406]]

Agreement and Consent Decree entered into by the United States of 
America and the State of Alaska on August 27, 1991, and approved by the 
United States District Court for the District of Alaska in settlement 
of United States of America v. State of Alaska, Civil Action No. A91-
081 CV. The agenda for the public hearing is the proposed Fiscal Year 
2001 Work Plan for the restoration of resources and services injured by 
the T/V Exxon Valdez oil spill of 1989. The public meeting agenda will 
feature a discussion of the Work Plan, as well as the status of habitat 
protection measures in the spill impact area, and plans for the long-
term Gulf Ecosystem Monitoring Program.

Willie R. Taylor,
Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 00-14920 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RG-P
#### § 959.27 Modification or revocation of orders.

A party against whom an order has been issued may file with the Recorder an application for modification or revocation, addressed to the Judicial Officer. The Recorder shall transmit a copy of the application to the General Counsel, who shall file a written reply within 10 days after filing, or such other period as the Judicial Officer may fix. A copy of the reply shall be sent to the applicant by the Recorder. Thereafter an order granting or denying such application in whole or in part will be issued by the Judicial Officer.

[39 FR 33213, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended at 63 FR 66052, Dec. 1, 1998]
IB

Union Calendar No. 131

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 535

[Report No. 106–230]

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections to a map relating

to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

JULY 13, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corrections

to a map relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAP.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

6 shall make such corrections to the map described in sub-
2

•HR 535 RH

1 section (b) as are necessary to move on that map the

2 boundary of the otherwise protected area (as defined in

3 section 12 of the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of

4 1990 (16 U.S.C. 3503 note; Public Law 101–591)) to the

5 Cape Henlopen State Park boundary to the extent

6 necessary—

7 (1) to exclude from the otherwise protected area

8 the adjacent property leased, as of the date of enact9 ment of this Act, by the Barcroft Company and

10 Cape Shores Associates (which are privately held

11 corporations under the law of the State of Dela12 ware); and

13 (2) to include in the otherwise protected area

14 the northwestern corner of Cape Henlopen State

15 Park seaward of the Lewes and Rehoboth Canal.

16 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map described in this

17 subsection is the map that is included in a set of maps

18 entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’, dated Octo19 ber 24, 1990, as revised October 15, 1992, and that re20 lates to the unit of the Coastal Barrier Resources System

21 entitled ‘‘Cape Henlopen Unit DE–03P’’.

Union Calendar No. 131

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 535

[Report No. 106–230]

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make corResources System. rections to a map relating to the Coastal Barrier

JULY 13, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Hillsborough County Probate Court

No. 78-228

#### *In re*Estate of Sadie L. Clancy

January 31, 1979

*Clancy & O’Neill,*of Nashua, *and Salomon & McCarthy,*of Hampton *(Frank B. Clancy*orally), for the estate.

*Thomas D. Rath,*attorney general *(Andrew R. Grainger,*assistant attorney general, orally), for the State of New Hampshire.

Memorandum Opinion

Sadie L. Clancy, who died July 16, 1977, bequeathed to her sister Bessie her entire estate. For more than ten consecutive years prior to *43Bessie’s fifteenth birthday, the sisters lived together in the same household with their parents. The Department of Revenue of the State of New Hampshire assessed a succession tax under RSA 86:6 I upon the estate of Sadie. The estate and Bessie claim an exemption under RSA 86:6 II (f) (Supp. 1977), which exempts from taxation property which passes to “a person who for ten consecutive years prior to his fifteenth birthday was a member of the household of the decedent.” The Probate Court (Copadis, J.) transferred the question without ruling on an agreed statement of facts.

The statute does not make exemptions for members of the same household but rather for a member of the “household of the decedent.” During the time the sisters were living together prior to the fifteenth birthday of Bessie, they were living in the household of their parents not the household of Sadie the decedent. To construe the statute so as to exempt the property from taxation in this case would be contrary to its plain words. This construction is also consistent with the legislative history which shows that the exemption was intended to apply to certain persons under fifteen living in the household of one who had their “care and custody.” N.H.S. JOUR. 347 (March 1972). This is not the situation in this case.

*Remanded.*
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Steckel, Andrew

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:52 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa

Cc: McKaughan, Colleen

Subject: FW: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction SIP Call

Attachments: SSM SIP_2060-AR68_Final_PreambleRule.pdf; SSM SIP final rule_Fact Sheet.pdf; McCabe 

letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

Ahh, sorry about my confusion.  Colleen just sent you our notice to Arizona.  Here’s our notice to California.  ‐ Andy

From: Steckel, Andrew  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 1:11 PM

To: 'glens@co.kern.ca.us'; 'bradpoiriez@co.imperial.ca.us'; Reyes Romero; Sheraz Gill (Sheraz.Gill@valleyair.org); Errol

Villegas; Sylvia Vanderspek (svanders@arb.ca.gov); 'Sutkus, Carol@ARB'

Cc: Jordan, Deborah; Drake, Kerry; Zimpfer, Amy; Smith, Noah; LEVIN, NANCY; Vineyard, Christine; Lakin, Matt; Adams,

Elizabeth

Subject: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction SIP Call

Dear Colleagues, 

This is a follow-up to my phone calls this afternoon to let you know that EPA’s Administrator signed 

a final action today to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all 

times, including when sources operate during periods of startup, shutdown or malfunction (SSM). 

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians 

concerning the treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM periods, 

specifically how those emissions are treated in state implementation plan (SIP) provisions that the 

EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action, EPA has revised and clarified its policy 

concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act. 

EPA is calling for 36 states, including East Kern, Imperial and San Joaquin in California, to make 

changes to their SIPs to protect public health and ensure consistency with the Clean Air Act. SIP 

revisions are due to EPA by November 22, 2016. 

As part of our notification about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter from EPA’s 

Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe, plus a pre-publication version 

of the notice and the Fact Sheet. We have also posted a pre-publication version of the action on 

our website at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html. 

If you or your staff have questions, feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4115, 

steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

- Andy
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TOSECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Joseph J. Talley ChiefFinancial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company. (the “Company”), doeshereby certify that:

 

1.     TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has causedthis instrument to be executed this 14th day of January, 2004.

 
| By:                            | /s/ Joseph J.  Talley |   |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
| Name: Joseph J. Talley         |
| Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
#### § 963.7 Location of hearing.

Hearings are held at 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201-3078, or other locations designated by the presiding officer.

[63 FR 66053, Dec. 1, 1998]
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000411

25-SEP-2018

10:57 AM