1 .

IN TH E U N ITED STAH S D ISTRICT CO URT FO R TH E

SO UTH ERN D ISTRICT O F FLO RID A

FILED BY / cj' ()c

DONALD J.TRUM P,

Plaint? X0.9:22-G-81294-AMC A16S0 2022 !.

.

jtujutrE.jjyrj

v. - - ,.z.oyvh.-w.nJ

Dated:August29,2022

LJN ITED STATESOF AM ERICA,

.

h'

JURYTRIALDEM ANDED

Defendant '

i M OVANT-INTERVENOR (PRO SEI-llA IK.PATEL'SM OTION TO ALTER OR

I AM END IUD GM ENT AT DKT.30,UNDER FED.R.CIV.P.59(e),

OR M OTION FOR RELIEFFROM IUDGM ENT OR ORDER AT DKT.30- .

UN D ER FED .R.CIV .P.60

I

1,T.E.,T.ERAJK.PATEL,theundersigned m ovant-intervenorprOse,in theabovenam ed case,hereby movethisUnited StatesDistrictCourtfortheSouthern Districtof

I FloridatoalteroramenditsjudgmentatDkt.30,basedonthismotionbecauseitincludes

areplytoPlaintiff'sDkt.28,orthegrantrelieffrom ajudgmentororderatDkt.30,also

h basedon thism otionbecausethism otionincludesareplytoPlaindff'sDkt.28.

I

!I w l-mltEAs;thesupplementalfiling atDkt. 28containsan elaboraûonofsubjectmatterjurisdictionontheFourthAmendmentagainsttmlawfulsearc.handseizuresand

castledoctrinèasapplied totheM ar-a-Lago;and,

W HEREAS,1usemyConstitutionalPrivileges,honors,andrightsofknowingfrom

. my undergraduate and 1aw school,jurisdoctorcandidacp educationsand polidcal

officesandfrom readinglaw outsideofform alschoolMgforthewritinganddiscussions,

ar> m ents,andmotionsofthesefilings,seeDkt.21at5& 20;and,

I

W HEREAS,Fed.R.Civ.P.24 allow sforeitherintervention byrightorperm issive

i interventionandshareswiththemainactiona''commonquesdonof1aw orfact''orthat

I

é 

1

:

i

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 10
Ihave''ininterestrelatingtothepropertyortransactionthatisthesubjectoftheactionz''

which also includes ''im penetrable shield'' of castle doctrine applied to form er

Presidents-H eadsofStateandtheM ar-a-l-ago,wherethePresidendalRecordsw erekept,

unlikeintheO1dWorldwheretheheadofstate,TheSovereign/lieKing/TheQueen

who is Com m ander-in-chief,owned the castles ofform erheadsofstate and other

incum bentroyalsandnobilityandhead ofgovernment,and that,here,severably andin

addition,PresidentBidenshouldhavedirectlyactedasCom m ander-in-chieforused the

SecretServicetoenlorceandseekrekievalofthedocum ents,and thatallowing current

proceedingswithoutintervention wil be prejudicialto me,the movant-intervenor,

becausethisCourt'sholdingwillcreateaprecedentialholdin:whichcanbeextendedor

aPPlied to m e,in m y currentcapacity as former elected excellentlocalpresidendal

official,andm yfuturepropertyinterestin thetransaction ofholdingthePresidencyand

theipsofactoofficeoftheformerPresidentanditsresidqnceandofficelocationswhich

willbealsobeeffectedbycastledoctrineandnotallowinginterventioncanbarmefrom

re-lidgatingmycommonquestionsof1aw orfactorrelatedinterestsintheproperty(titles

of''T.H.(T.E.)Presidentg''castledoctrine,etc.)ortransaction(colectionofPresidential

RecordsAct-protected docum ents,useofspecialagentsoftheF.B.I.ratherthan Secret

Serviceormilitary)throughresjudicata;seePatelv.UnitedStates,No.1:21-cv-02004-LAS

(C.F.C.202-),Dkt.1at34-5,Pet.forW ritofCertvPatelv.UnitedStates,No.22-5280(U.S.

202- ),U.S.const.amend.lV,42U.S.C.jj1981-2& 2000bbefseq.,44U.S.C.jj2201etseq.,

seeLangep.Calfornia,141S.Ct.2011,2023(U.S.2021)andCarpenterp.UnitedStates,138

S.Ct.2206,2239-40,2260,2263-4(U.S.2018),seealsoLuckyBrandDungarees,Inc.v.Marcel

FashionsGroup,Inc.,140S.Ct.1589(2020),Bravo-Fernandezp.UnitedStates,137S.Ct.352

(2016),seeU.S.const.art.VI,j 1referring to theTreaty ofParis (1983)(incumbent

MonarchremainstheAbsoluteoftheUnitedStates),Comp:.onJudiciaryr.M cGchn,415

2

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 2 of 10
F.Supp.3d 148,154 (D.D.C.2019)oackson,J.)(''DOJPromotes a conception of

separation-of-powers prindples that gets these constitudonal comm ands exactly

backwards.In realitp itisacoretenetofthisNadon'sfotmding thatthepowersofa

m onarch m ust be split between the branches of the government to prevent

tyratmy...l-lere,onceagain,DOJcalsonseparation-of-powersprinciplestodoworkthat

the Fram ersneverintended. Indeed,theentire pointofsegregating thepowersofa

m onarchintothethreedifferentbranchesofgovernm entw astogiveeachbranchcertain

authoritythattheothersdidnotpossesso..v),Federalist69(''Thereisevidentlyagreat

inferiority in the powerofthe President.v),and compareFederalistfkpers(drawing

distincdonofstate,whichisaform eiPresidentandpossiblysom e1aw enforcem entsuch

asSecretService,andgovernment,whichisDOJ-F.B.I.)withU.S.const.art.1,j8,c1.17

(''seatofGovernmentv);and,

W HEREAS,the aforesaid is also protected by the executive Privilege and Due

Processand security clearancesasapplied to form erPresidents,pertheUnited States

Constitution,thePresidentialRecordsAct,andotherActsofCongress,U.S.const.art.lV,

j2& amend.v,44U.S.C.jj2201etseq.,Patelv.UnitedStates,No.1:21-cv-02004-LAS

(C.F.C.202-),Dkt.1at23,para.no.XW (incltldessöcialsecuritynumber),Patelp.United

States,No.22-1131(Fed.Cir.M ay19,2022),ECF40at54(includessocialsecuritynumber

includedinW hiteHousecorrespondence),andPet.forW ritofCertvPatelp.UnitedStates,

No.22-5280(U.S.202-/and,

W HEREAS,basedonthePlaintiff'ssupplem entalfiling atDkt.28,them ain acdon

mightbesubjecttothePoliticalQuestionDoctrine,asDkt.21at15-18statesthatCongress

m aynothavehad thevestedpowerstoenactthePresidentialRecordsActasaRulefor

Government,U.S.ionst.art.1,jj1& 8,cl.14,M cM ahonp.PresidentialAirways,502F.3d

1331,1351(111 Cir.2007)(quotingBakerv.Carr,369U.S.186,217(U.S.1962)),Sweenq 'f?.

3

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 3 of 10
Tucker,375A.2d698,473Pa.493,509(Pa.1977)(ProfessorW echslerdescribedtheheart

ofthepolidcalquestiondoctrinewhenhewrotethatapolidcalquesdonexistswhen ''the

Consdtudon has comm itted to another agency of goverm neht the autonom ous

determ inationoftheissueraised.''W echsler,Tow ardN eutralprinciplesofConsdtutional

Law,73Harv.L.Rev.1,7-8(1959).),butcf.McGahn,415F.Supp.at212& 212,n.33

(quotingComm.ontheJudiciary,LI.S,HouseofRepresentativesr.Miers,558F.Supp.2d53,

103(D.D.C.2008)(Bates,J.)(explainingthattheExecutivebranch'sseparation-of-powers

interestin ''lplresidentialautonomy,such asitis,''...so Congress can only use its

''historicaloversightfuncuons-l),andseeU.S.const.art.VI,j1referringtotheTreatyof

Paris(1983)(incumbentM onarchremainstheAbsoluteoftheUnitedStates);and,

W HEREAS,basedonthisCourtorderatDkt.29,thespecialm asterandtheprivilege

review team willrelyon thecom m on questionsand interestsraised in m yintervention

over''anydissem ination ofm aterialsbeyond theprivilegereview team /'seeDkt.29and

seealsoPet.forW ritofCert.,Patelr.UnitedStates,No.22-5280(U.S.202-/and,

W HEREAS,based on the salient coverage and com ments from Plaindff and

Plaindff'sform erpolicyadvisorsand fam ilymembers,airedontelevision afterthefiling

ofDkt.28,Plaindffcould have been targeted by Defendantas a partofthe ''woke''

movement,andburdensmyfreeexerciseofreligion,U.S.const.amend.I& 42U.S.C.j

2000bb-1(c);and,

W HEREAS,thesecretdocumentsgoingforprivilegeteam review underthespecial

m asterincludedocum entswith them ulticulturalelem entsofidentitypolitics,am ongst

existingpardes(e.g.incumbentPresident,Attom eyGeneral,andformerPresident)and

foreignpolicyand thecontemporarpoldW orldcotm triesandm onarchs,whoareeither

'HeadsoftheirChurch orGod overtheirpeopleand descendantsin theUnited States

'

whoareLoyaltothem,and O1dW orldtheocracies,includingtheHolySee(religious

4

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 4 of 10
(

I

l1 ,

I

I leaderoftheDefendant-presidentBiden)andtheSövereignSocialistSecularDemocratic

Republic(alsoknownas''India''or''Hindustanv),willundulyburdenmyfreeexercise

ofreligion,especially sincetheDefendantsand thepartiesofthe main action haveno

reason to burden m y free exeycise and consciousnessofHindu religion,aFounding

I religion andpoliticalpoweroftheAm ericanColonies,theDeclaradonofIndependence

I

! (1776),duringtheAmericanRevolution and afterwardsin formingtheUnited States

Constitudon,and cause m e anxietp as Ihave secured and hold two omnipresent

ki : styles/titles/executiveprivileges,FulFaith&CreditC1.,U.S.const.art.lV,j1,42U.S.C.

j 'I jj1981-2,seegenerallyU.S.const.art.Vl,j1referringtoEmmaRothschild,A (New)

I .

I! ! EconomicHistory oftheAmerican Revolution'?,91New Engl.Q.110,110-28(2018),

i I

1 https://doi.org/10.1162/tneq a 00662andseeallMuseum oftheAmericanRevoludon,

1 p

' l! Revo1ution Arotmd the W orld: India and the Am erican Revolution,

.

t https:/kwww.am revm useum .org/india-and-l e-american-revolutionw'and,

i

W HEREAS,state 1aw which restricts use of military powers and guarantees

I .

'!

additionalprivacysecuritiesfrom theFederalCorustitutiontoprivatecitizens,including

I

thePlaintiff,M 'izingTech.Servs.v.BerBhireHathawaySpecialtyIns.Co.,22-a -20596-CM AEGT*5(S.D.Fla.Apr.14,2022)andseegeneralyFla.const.;and,

W HEREAS, my societal econom ic developm ent interests, from a11 of m y

consdtutionalcapacities,w illbe im paired tmless this CourtMllow sforintervention,

contra.Georgiav.U,5.ArmyComsofEngineers,302F.3d 1242,1251(111 Cir.2002)

(economicinterestwith righttofreelytravelandhavean abode/castlewithmytitles,

whichareownedbymeunder42U.S.C.j1981-2),U.S.const.art.1V,j2& amend.XIV,

'i j1;and,

r

j ' I

; 5

ji ' .

) .

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 5 of 10
W HEREAS,along with the previous,my rightto freely travelwillbeimpaired,

Caterinav.M iler,259F.Supp.131,133(S.D.Fla.1966)(therewilbenotadequateremedy

instateorfederalcourtleft),U.S.çonst.art.IV,j2& amend.XIV,j19apd,

W HEREAS,a11ofthisisaparticularized,actualandimm inentinvasion ofalegally

protectedinterestandhasaffectedme''inapersonalandindividualwap''Lujanv.

DefendersofWildlfe,504U.S.555,555,560,573,577(1992),Corjeldv.Coryell,No.6Fed.

Cas.546(C.C.E.D.Pa.1823),InreQuarles& Butler,158U.S.532,536-37(U.S.1895),see

generaly18U.S.C.jj241etseq.,42U.S.C.jj1981-2,seealsoSlaughter-HouseCases,83U.S.

(16W al.)36,71,& 77-79(1873),and UnitedStatesv.Harris,106U.S.629,638& 643-44

(1883/and,

WHEREAS,ascapacityasexcellent,1,themovant-intervenor,havealegalinjury

sincetheStateorGovem m entisnotoperating ConstiG tionally and with accord to its

policp which isan issue here,Federalist80 (I,asan internationalenforcerofthe

Constitution,and Privilege& ImmunitiesClause,affectsthebasisoftheUnion)and

Lujan,504U.S.at555,560,573,&577;and,

W HEREAS,theprecedendaleffectand consequendalproceedingsofthiscaseare

verylikelytogobeforetheUnitedStatesSuprem eCourt.

THEREFORE,lmovethisCourttoalteroramenditsjudgmentatDkt.30underFed.

R.Civ.P.59(e)orgrantrelieffrom judgmlntatDkt.30underFed.R.Civ.P.60andalow

intervention.

W HEREAS,1,the m ovant-inteN enor,filed a M odon for Jn Forma Pauperis to

continueinthisdistrictcourtwithoutpre-payingfilingfeesatDkt.22;and,

W HEREAS,therehasbeen no m aterialchangein IFP inform adon sincetheshort

periodofHm ebetweenthefilingofDkt.22and thisM odon;and,

6

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 6 of 10
W HEREAS,otherfederalcourtshave granted recçntly-filed m otionsforleave to

proceedinforma'pauperis,Patelv.UnitedStates,No.1:22-cv-734-LAS(C.F.C.Aug.12,

2022),Dkt.7& Patelv.UnitedStates,No.22-5280(U.S.202-/and,

WHEREAS,thisCourtrejectedmyModonforLeavetoProceedInFormaPauperis

atDkt.22on August27,2022,seeDkt.30.

THEREFORE,ImovethisCourttoalteroramenditsjudgmentatDkt.30underFed.

R.Civ.P.59(e)orgrantrelieffrom jud.gmentatDkt.30underFed.R.Civ.P.60andgrant

m y M odon forLeaveto Proceed In Form aPauperis.

FURTITER,ifthis M otion is notpersuasive as to eitherrequestbutthisCourt

believesthatintentcouldbeeffectualized,then Im ovethattheCourtissuean orderto

show cause.ArabianAm.OilCo.v.Scarfone,939F.2d1472(111 Cir.1991)9Smithv.Select

PorfolioServicingInc.,1:22-cv-22499-GAYLES(S.D.Fla.Aug.10,2022/UnitedStatesp.

M ichel,No.19-13408(111 Cir.Oct.22,2020/Brownv.LJ.S.Patent,226F.App'x866(11th

Cir.2007/andJacksonv.Corr.C0m.,606F.App'x945(111 Cir.2015).

FURTHER'ImovethatthisCourt,toaidinpresentationofthiscaseandensurethat

.

'

1,themovant-intervenor,canavoidanyotherprejudicetoeitherthisCourtorhimself,

appointacourt-appointedcounsel(i.e.probono).Smithv.Newsome,876F.2d1461(111

Cir.1989)(intrinsicalybeyond aproselitigant'sability),Dkt.21at20,and Scheuerp.

Rhodes,416U.S.232,236(1974)quotedinRayv.Proxmire,581F.2d998,1003-04(D.C.Cir.

1978).SeealsoPruittv.CharterCommc'ns,No.21-10049(111 Cir.Feb.11,2022).

*''(A1prose (motionl,howeverinartfuly pleaded,mustbe held to lessstringent

standardsth% formalpleadingsdraftedby lawyers.''EricBonv.Pardus,551U.S.89,94

(2007).

7

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 7 of 10
Respectfully subm itted,

/s/RajK.Patel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(prose)

6850East21stStreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

M arion County

317-450-6651(ce1l)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

J.D.Candidate,NotreDameL.Sch.2015-2017

President/studentBodyPresident,StudentGov'tAss'nof

EmoryU.,Inc.2013-2014(corp.sovereignzol3-present)

StudentBodyPresident,BrownsburgCm ty.Sch.

Corp./president,BrownsburgHighSch.StudentGov't

2009-2010(corp.sovereign2009-present)

Rep.from theNotreDam eL.Sch.StudentB.Ass'ntothe

Ind.St.B.A ss'n 2017

DeputyRegionalDirector,YoungDem ocratsofAm .-l-ligh

Sch.Caucus2008-2009

Co-Founder& ViceChair,Ind.HighSch.Dem ocrats2009-

2010

VicePresidentofFin.tIndep.l,OxfordC.Republicansof

Em ory U .,Inc.2011-2012

%lN T

w t. - * ks.s cogs î

1 . pohit & jwjjttkdt w >

u o.zvo. x

w .1 .

i Ré@.j.-p w

t 1** l'ft!zfye1î:o.*toâ

ti1.tç(9t$.tk'za#

Aixu.q

8

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 8 of 10
CERTIFICATE 0*SERVICE

IcerdfythatIservedacopyoftheforegoingRajK.Patel's(ProSe)ModontoAlteror

AmendorGrantRelieffrom Judgementon08/29/2022tobelow individualsviatheem ail:

JamesM .Trusty

IFRAH ,PLLC

1717PennsylvaniaA ve,N W ,Suite650

W ashington,DC 20006

202-852-5669

jtrusty@ifrahlawycom

Lindsey H alligan

511SE 51 Avenue

FortLauderdale,Florida33301

720-435-2870

lindseyhalligan@outlook.com

M .Evan Corcoran

Silverman,Thom pson,Slutkin,& W hite,

LLC

400EastPrattStreet,Suite900

Baltim ore,M D 21230

410-385-2225

ecorcoran@silvermanzompson.com

JuanAntonioGonzalez

LJN ITED STATES ATTORN EY

99NE41 Street,81 Floor

M iam i,F133132

Telephone:(305)961-9001

juan.antonio.gonzalez@usdoj.gov

Jay1.Bratt,Chief

Counterintelligence& ExportControl

SectionN at'lSecurityDiv.

950PennsylvaniaAvenue,NW

W ashington,D.C.20530

(202)233-0986

jay.brattz@usdoj.gov

Dated:August2% 2022

Respectfullysubmitted,

/s/RajPatel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(ProSe)

6850East21stStreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

M arion County

317-450-6651(ce1)

rajpzolo@gmail.com

www.rajpatel.live

9

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 9 of 10
.

x..'v

>,> =

N

* M

'

*

é.

Lk%'lB.l..>T

CN.k)k*w%.1jtQj .

.-

.

.

r,;.u.

.

j.,

1..o,t,..

y

..

'J<..

4a,,<w.

'.

.

...<a

J

(

gjtjjg.mm plneisM rrlyjljTD

6850Eerzsb*TSmG cMtaMkz7lNer4gz:

'

NOIG USlN4Q19 B!lSO ER

Uhgrgnsrarëtls

te CLERKOFCOIJRT-SDFI.A

PGRFED.BLDG.&U:CTHOUSE il

7R2M1CLEMATISST )

202 1

WESTPALMBEACHFL33401 *

jKj.j1)1y14;1 ReF

:GT

lI2lIl1I2Ir&q:1IlëInI IjlIP

j I j'' ' W Wf'

1

- j I$ !

l I, l$ t ! '

.1:-.$?17;:152 'irli/s..t-I- lt'

?sq,

ëIlIIIIlI!1l! *4ç%%t1t:1/:%Kollt/tltl/rt::

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 10 of 10