alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Yuhua Yang, the Chief Financial Officer of TEC TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.   The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 5th day of
April, 2011.

| | /s/
      Yuhua Yang                              
| | --------------------------------------------------
| | Yuhua Yang                                        
| | Chief Financial Officer                           
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to TEC Technology, Inc. and will be retained by TEC
Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
**Exhibit
      23.1**




**Consent
      of WithumSmith + Brown, P.C.**




CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-47736 and 333-90088) pertaining to the GoAmerica Communications
      Corp. 1999 Stock Option Plan, the GoAmerica, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan and the
      GoAmerica, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated March 20,
      2006,
      with respect to the financial statements and schedule of GoAmerica, Inc., for
      the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, included in the Annual Report
      (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.









/s/
      WithumSmith+Brown, P.C.




New
      Brunswick, New Jersey


March
      30,
      2006
#### Commonwealth for Reynolds *vs*Kinnaird.

Error *to the*Garrard Circuit.

*Guardian*bonds. *Prochein amic.*

*June*12.

Case stated.

In a suit against one of several obligors in a guardian’s bond, it is no ground of defence that another of the obligors is the next friend of the infant for whose benefit the suit is bro’t.

Judge Gkaiiam

delivered the opinion of tho Court.

This action upon a joint and several bond executed by a guardian and his sureities, is brought against one only for an alleged failure of the guardian to discharge his duties as such. The ward being yet a minor, the action is prosecuted by Saymore Hopper, as his next friend. The defendant plead that Seymore Hopper, the next friend, is the same man who, by that name, is an obligor in the bond as one of the sureties of the guardian. The Court overruled the demurrer to this plea, and having rendered judgment in bar of plaintiff’s action, the case is brought to this Court. The only question, therefore, is whether the plafntiff’s action can be defeated by reason of the fact that the relator’s *'prochein amie,*is also one of the sureties of the guardian? The suit, although in the name of the Commonwealth, and prosecuted by “a next friend,” is in truth for the sole and exclusive benefit of the ward; the judgment, if one he had, is for his benefit, and the money due from the guardian will be, when collected, his money. His next friend has no manner of interest in it. It is true he may be hound for the costs of the suit; but that fact cannot operate to the prejudice of the ward, nor can we perceive any reason why it should prevent him from acting as the next friend of the infant. As one of the co-securities he may, in certain contingencies, be liable to contribute to Kinnaird a portion of the sum the latter may be compelled to pay; but that will be a matter between themselves not at all affecting the ward, for he cannot have any interest in it.

It seems to us that, the plea presented no bar to the plaintiff’s action, and the demurrer ought to have been sustained.

*250
      *Lush fy Harrison*for plaintiff; *J.*4* *W. L. Harlan*for defendant.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is, therefore reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to set aside the judgment and sustain the demurrer to the plea, and for other and further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Statistics on Banking

              																	Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Division of Research and Statistics. 						*Statistics on Banking : A Statistical History of the United States Banking Industry, Historical 1934-1996*,										August 1997,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/125,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
22-MJ-03333-Torres

Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 1 of 22
ID 204

22-MJ-03333-Torres

Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 2 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 3 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 4 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 5 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 6 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 7 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 8 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 9 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 10 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 11 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 12 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 13 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 14 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 15 of 22
o

Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 16 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 17 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 18 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 19 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 20 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 21 of 22
Case 1:22-cr-20529-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 22 of 22
§ 762.27 Processing of disbursement postal money orders by Federal Reserve Banks. In accordance with an agreement between the Postal Service and the Federal Reserve Banks as depositaries and fiscal agents of the United States, Federal Reserve Banks will handle Disbursement Postal Money Orders as follows: ( a ) Federal Reserve Banks shall not be expected to cash Disbursement Postal Money Orders presented directly to them for payment; and
( b ) Each Federal Reserve Bank shall: ( 1 ) Receive Disbursement Postal Money Orders from its member banks, and its other depositors which guarantee all prior endorsements thereon;
( 2 ) Give immediate credit therefor in accordance with its current Time Schedules and charge the amount thereof to the general account of the U.S. Treasury, subject to examination and payment by the Postal Service; and
( 3 ) Forward the Disbursement Postal Money Orders to the Postal Service.
Hillsborough

No. 78-250

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Haydn A. Jones

February 28, 1979

*Thomas D. Rath,*attorney general *(Peter W. Mosseau,*attorney, on brief), for the State.

*James E. Duggan,*of Manchester, on brief, for the defendant.

PER CURIAM.

This criminal appeal requires us to determine whether the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the weight to be given to the testimony of police officers as specifically requested by the defendant requires a new trial. The defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by *Flynn,*J. The defendant had been arrested for disorderly conduct and for interference with an arrest, and was temporarily confined at the Manchester police station with his girlfriend. The girlfriend and another woman in her cell started to fight and the police then moved various prisoners within the cellblock to avoid further fighting. According to the officers, the defendant refused to enter the cell to which he was being moved, placed his hand on an officer’s weapon, and fired a shot superficially wounding another officer.

The testimony of the police officers and the testimony of the defendant and his girlfriend concerning the commencement of the fight between the defendant and the officers differed. The jury rejected the defendant’s claim of self-defense and convicted him of aggravated assault. At trial the defendant requested the following jury instruction: “You should consider the testimony of a police officer as you would any other witness. You should not give more weight to the testimony of a police officer simply because he or she is a police officer.” The court rejected the instruction, stating that it was covered by the following portion of *115the charge: “In deciding what the facts are, of course you will not give any more weight to the testimony of a witness due to one’s race or color, or one’s particular station in life, because that has, as you know, no relevancy here at all.” Although on the facts of this case the defendant’s requested instructions could properly have been given, we find no error. The court’s instruction did not contain an incorrect statement of the law and did not omit an essential element of the case. The trial judge did not give a special instruction on the defendant’s credibility, and there was no prosecutorial overreaching as in *United States v. Reid,*410 F.2d 1223 (7th Cir. 1969), relied upon by the defendant. “It was within the trial court’s sound discretion to determine ‘whether an instruction on a particular issue is necessary to assist the jury in making its verdict. ’ ” *State v. Meloon,*119 N.H. 79, 80, 397 A.2d 1041, 1043 (1979), quoting *Fusegni v. Portsmouth Housing Authority,*114 N.H. 207, 209, 317 A.2d 580, 582 (1974).

*Exceptions overruled.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

v.

THEODORE FARNSWORTH and J. 

MITCHELL LOWE,

Defendants.

Case No. 22-CR-20521-BB

PROPOSED ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Theodore Farnsworth’s motion to 

withdraw as attorney George J. Terwilliger, III. Mr. Farnsworth’s attorney, George J. 

Terwilliger, III seeks leave to withdraw on the grounds that he is leaving the law firm 

McGuireWoods LLP effective December 31, 2023. It appears Mr. Farnsworth has no objection 

to the relief sought in this Motion. It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. Mr. Terwilliger is hereby permitted to withdraw 

as counsel of record to the Defendant, Theodore Farnsworth.

2. Attorneys Henry P. Bell of Bell Rosquete Reyes Esteban, PLLC, and Jason Cowley, 

Benjamin O’Neil, and Roy G. Dixon, III, all of McGuireWoods LLP, shall remain as 

attorneys of record for Mr. Farnsworth.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this ___ day of ___________, 202__.

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 115-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/29/2023 Page 1 of 1
# Center Data

&"-,Bold"&12FY20 ILCL/ILST CIL Awards	Run Date: 9/30/2020

Page &P of &N
#### § 491.4 Identification of employees.

Garnishments must be accompanied by sufficient information to permit prompt identification of the employee and the payments involved. Garnishment of an employee whose name and social security number is similar to but not identical with the name and social security number on the garnishment will not be processed. An exact match of both name and social security number is required in order to permit processing; otherwise, the garnishment will be returned marked “Insufficient identifying information.” Garnishments which are insufficient in regard to identifying information will not be held pending receipt of further information and must be served again when the proper information is obtained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [NAFTA-03942]

Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on May 19, 2000 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Glacier Gold Compost, Incorporated, Olney, Montana.

In a letter dated June 5, 2000, the petitioner requested that the petition for NAFTA-TAA be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of June, 2000.

Grant D. Beale,

Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 00-15142 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
§ 955.8 Amendments of pleadings or record. ( a ) Upon its own initiative or upon application by a party, the Board may, in its discretion, order a party to submit a more definite statement of the complaint or answer, or to reply to an answer.
( b ) When issues within the proper scope of an appeal, but not raised in the pleadings, have been raised without objection or with permission of the Board at a hearing or in record submissions, they may be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings. If evidence is objected to at a hearing on the ground that it is not within the issues raised by the pleadings, in its discretion the Board may admit the evidence and grant the objecting party a continuance or other relief if necessary to enable it to meet such evidence.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ERIC ROGERS,

 Plaintiff Case Number: 9:22-cv-81737-AMC

V.

COCO PLUM PLAZA LLC.

Defendant

________________________________/

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) hereby gives this Honorable Court notice of

dismissal of this action with prejudice and, unless otherwise agreed, each party shall bear their own 

attorney’s fees and costs.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: December 5, 2022 / s / A l b e r t o R . L e al . 

Alberto R. Leal, Esq., P.A.

Florida Bar No.: 1002345

E-Mail: albertolealesq@gmail.com

Phone: 954-637-1868

Case 9:22-cv-81737-AMC Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2022 Page 1 of 1
MEMORANDUM TO FILE

TO: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0904; Partial Approval and Partial 

Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Arizona; Regional Haze 

Requirements; Proposed Rule

FROM: Colleen McKaughan

Date: May 8, 2013

Subject: Record of Correspondence with Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community 

and Phoenix Cement

1. Letter to President Diane Enos, dated February 28, 2013 – see docket item C-02

2. Emails from Colleen McKaughan including Gary Bohnee, SRPMIC, and Verle Martz, Phoenix 

Cement :

 January 29, 2013 - Extension of Public Comment Period

 February 4, 2013 – Extension of Public Comment Period

 February 26, 2013 – Revised FIP Deadline and Request for Information

3. Emails between Colleen McKaughan and Gary Bohnee, SRPMIC:

 February 11, 2013 – Consultation Request

 February 12, 2013 – Consultation Followup

 February 12, 2013 – Consultation Followup
Case 9:22-cr-80175-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022   Page 1 of 9

SP

Oct 14, 2022

West Palm Beach

Case 9:22-cr-80175-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022   Page 2 of 9

Case 9:22-cr-80175-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022   Page 3 of 9

Case 9:22-cr-80175-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022   Page 4 of 9

Case 9:22-cr-80175-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022   Page 5 of 9

Case 9:22-cr-80175-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022   Page 6 of 9

Case 9:22-cr-80175-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022   Page 7 of 9

Case 9:22-cr-80175-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022   Page 8 of 9

Case 9:22-cr-80175-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2022   Page 9 of 9
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.                                  /s/ Paul J. Evanson   Paul J. Evanson  May 8, 2007 Principal Executive Officer
§ 101-1.112 Change lines. ( a ) Single-column format: Vertical lines in the right margin of a page indicate material changed, deleted, or added by the FPMR amendment cited at the bottom of that page. Where insertion of new material results in shifting of unchanged material on following pages, no vertical lines will appear on such pages but the FPMR amendment transmitting such new pages will be cited at the bottom of each page.
( b ) Double-column format: Arrows printed in the margin of a page indicated material changed, deleted, or added by the FPMR amendment cited at the bottom of that page.
[54 FR 37652, Sept. 12, 1989]
Montana Cement Plants - 2008 Criteria Pollutant Emissions 

Emissions in tonsfyr 

State County Site Name CO NH3 NOX PM10-PRI PM25-PRI S02 VOC 

MT Gallatin HOLCIM US INC - TRIDENT PLANT 19.8 15.7 138.2 34.1 1.7 1.3 

MT Jefferson ASH GROVE CEMENT 39.4 1.6 2264.9 89.9 32.8 1177.7 6.0
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

EXHIBIT

“C”

EXHIBIT “C”

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 127-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/21/2023 Page 1 of 5
Exhibit 31.1

               CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB


     I, Hunter M. A. Carr, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of ITIS Holdings
Inc., a Nevada Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's disclosure internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: November 15, 2004
-----------------------

/s/ Hunter M.A. Carr
--------------------
Name: Hunter M.A. Carr
Title: Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>