alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 59751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23604]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action deletes a product and service from the Procurement 
List previously furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Effective Date: 11/3/2014.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 
603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Deletions

    On 8/29/2014 (79 FR 51561), the Committee for Purchase From People 
Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice of proposed 
deletions from the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the relevant matter presented, the Committee 
has determined that the product and service listed below are no longer 
suitable for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 
8501-8506 and 41 CFR 51-2.4.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities.
    2. The action may result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the product and service to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 
8501-8506) in connection with the product and service deleted from the 
Procurement List.

End of Certification

    Accordingly, the following product and service are deleted from the 
Procurement List:

Product

NSN: 5340-00-410-2296--Cover, Fire Extinguisher
NPA: Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation, Huntsville, AL
Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, 
Philadelphia, PA

Service

Service Type/,Location: Catering Service, Military Entrance 
Processing Station, Leo O'Brien Federal Building, Suite 810, Albany, 
NY
NPA: Albany County Chapter, NYSARC, Inc., Slingerlands, NY
Contracting Activity: Dept of the Army, W6QM MICC Ctr-Ft Knox, Ft 
Knox, KY

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-23604 Filed 10-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FLOYD A. SMITH, § 

§ No. 200, 2017

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court of the 

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ Cr. ID No. 1209014436 (K)

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: May 22, 2017

Decided: May 23, 2017

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 23rd day of May 2017, it appears to the Court that:

(1) On May 15, 2017, the appellant, Floyd A. Smith, filed a notice of appeal 

from a sentence imposed on December 30, 2016 on a violation of probation

(“VOP”). This is Smith’s second appeal from the December 30 sentence. In Smith’s 

prior appeal from the December 30 sentence, this Court affirmed the sentence.1

(2) On May 15, 2017, the Clerk issued a notice directing Smith to show 

cause why his appeal filed on May 15, 2017 should not be dismissed as untimely 

 

1

See Smith v. State, 2017 WL 1399749 (Del. April 18, 2017) (affirming VOP sentence).
2

filed.2 The notice also reminded Smith of his previous appeal from the December 

30 sentence.

(3) Smith filed a response to the notice to show cause on May 22, 2017. 

Smith’s response does not address the untimeliness of his current appeal or 

acknowledge that he appealed the December 30 sentence earlier this year.

(4) Smith’s current appeal from the December 30 sentence is untimely and 

redundant and must be dismissed. Smith appealed the December 30 sentence earlier 

this year.3 He may not file another appeal from the same sentence.4 Smith’s current 

appeal also is untimely because it was not filed within thirty days of the sentencing.5

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED under Supreme Court Rule 29(b) and 

(c), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

 

2 Under Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iii), a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after a 

sentence is imposed.

3

Supra note 1.

4 Accord Evans v. State, 2016 WL 3751843 (Del. July 5, 2016) (prohibiting second appeal from 

same order); Paskins v. State, 1998 WL 123194 (Del. March 5, 1998) (dismissing appeal as 

redundant).

5

Supra note 2.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Texas Depart ment of Aging and Disability

Ser vices

,

Appellant

,

v.

Michael Lagunas

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 095

- CV

Appeal from the

3 27 th District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 2014

- DCV

- 2261 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the b rief until August 2 3

, 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELL EE ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon

. Jonathan L.R. Baeza

, the Appell ee’ s attorney, prepare

the Appell ee ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 23

, 201 9

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14 th day of August

, 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AMACAN
RESOURCES CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                          56,523
<SECURITIES>                                   454,119
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               523,923
<PP&E>                                       3,558,134
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,333,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 748,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,584
<BONDS>                                         15,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       770,433
<OTHER-SE>                                   (116,031)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   748,136
<SALES>                                        108,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,284
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                95,299
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (54,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (903)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,201)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (55,201)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.020)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.020)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kore Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10KSB/A (First Amendment) for the year ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Denis C. Tseklenis, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  February 14, 2005

/s/Denis C. Tseklenis
Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kore Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10KSB/A (First Amendment) for the year ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Denis C. Tseklenis, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  February 14, 2005

/s/ Denis C. Tseklenis
Denis C. Tseklenis
Treasurer
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 953.10 Presiding Officers.

The presiding officer at any hearing shall be an Administrative Law Judge qualified in accordance with law or the Judicial Officer (39 U.S.C. 204). The Chief Administrative Law Judge shall assign cases. The Judicial Officer may preside at the hearing if an Administrative Law Judge is unavailable.

[81 FR 40193, June 21, 2016]
Exhibit 32.1

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|            |  |                                       | 
|----------- |  | ------------------------------------- | 
|            |  | RELM Wireless Corporation             | 
|            |  |                                       | 
|            |  |                                       | 
|            |  | /s/ DAVID P. STOREY                   | 
|            |  | David P. Storey                       | 
|            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 6, 2009 |  |                                       |
EXHIBIT 32.1.

                                   Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                                            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Alex Demitriev, Chief Executive Officer of Merilus, Inc. (the "Registrant")
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period December 31, 2001 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                            By: /s/ Alex Demitriev
                                             -------------------------------
                                            Alex Demitriev
                                              Chief Executive Officer

December 12, 2006

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Merilus, Inc. and will be retained by Merilus, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                   Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                                            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Alex Demitriev, Chief Accounting Officer of Merilus, Inc. (the "Registrant")
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period December 31, 2001 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                            By: /s/ alex Demitgriev
                                             -----------------------------------
                                            Alex Demitriev
                                            Chief Accounting Officer

December 12, 2006

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Merilus, Inc. and will be retained by Merilus, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MESABAAIRUNES 

^i^"= 

May 21, 2010 

Todd M. Homan ^ 

Director 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 

Office'of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

Room 64171 . • 

400 7* Street, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20590. 

Re: Order Requesting Proposal for Essential Air Service at Greenville, Mississippi. 

Docket OST-2008-0209. 

Dear Mr. Homan: 

In response to the Department's Order 2010-5-2, Mesaba Aviation, Inc., doing business 

as Delta Connection, is enclosing a detailed subsidy proposal for essential air service at 

Greenville (GLH), Mississippi at a level of 14 roundtrip flights per week per market using 34-

seat Saab 340 aircraft from Delta's Memphis (MEM) hub. 

M EM -GLH 7 Weekly Round Trips 

2x/(lay, T^Pays/Week 

MEM-GLH 

Station Tims 

Dep Arr Oep Arr 

MEM GLH 14:45' 15:41 

MEM -GLH 

Station 

Dep Arr 

GLH MEM 

Time 

Dep Arr 

16:55 17:52 

MEM-GLH 

Station 

Dep Arr 

•MEM GLH 

Time 

Dep Air 

19:20 20:11 

MEM -GLH 

Station Time 

Dep Arr Dep Arr 

GLH MEM 6:40 7:42 

The required annual subsidy for the GLH service would be $1,606,662 as outlined in Attachment 

A.. 

Delta Coimection provides scheduled service between Delta's hubs and many cities 

throughout the U.S. Delta's Memphis hub provides Greenville customers with convenient, 

single-carrier connections to hundreds of flights in the U.S./Canadian and worldwide. We look 

looo BLUE GENTIAN ROAD, SUITE 200, EAGAN, M N 55121-1679 
forward to the opportunity to continue providing essential air service to the Greenville 

community. , 

Respectfully submitted, 

John G. Spanjers 

^'resident 

Attachment 
Attachment A 

EAS service proposal for service to Greenville, Mississippi 

EAS Station 

Docket Number 

Hub «» 

Round trips per week 

Completion Factor 

Total Passengers 

Total Block Hours 

Total Departures 

Passenger Revenue 

•Other Revenue 

Total Revenue 

Pilots 

Fuel 

Maintenance 

Aircraft 

Total Directs 

Total Indirects 

Total Operating 

Inflation Rate allowance 

Profit 

Economic Cost 

Required Annual Subsidy Rate 

0.75% 

5.0% 

GLH 

DOT-OST-2001-10685 

MEM 

14 

97% 

9,913 

1,272 

1,416 

$743,505 

$93,777 

$837,282 

$318,023 

$318,426 

$545,856 

$289,044 

$1,471,349 

$839,709 

$2,311,058 

$17,333 

$115,553 

$2,443,944 

$1,606,662
#### § 6.12-1 General supervision and control.

The Captain of the Port may supervise and control the transportation, handling, loading, discharging, stowage, or storage of hazardous materials on board vessels as covered by the regulations in 49 CFR parts 170-189, 46 CFR parts 150-156, 46 CFR parts 146-148 and the regulations governing tank vessels (46 CFR parts 30-39).

[CGD 77-228, 43 FR 53427, Nov. 16, 1978]
EXHIBIT 15(a)




                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP







November 9, 1999


Alabama Power Company
600 North 18th Street
Birmingham, Alabama  35291



Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that Alabama Power Company has incorporated by reference in
Registration Statement 333-67453 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 1999 which includes our report on Alabama Power Company dated November 9,
1999 covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein.
Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such report
is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by
our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5161 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5161

  To provide the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate 
    whether officials from the People's Republic of China tried to 
          illegally influence the 1996 Presidential Election.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2000

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate 
    whether officials from the People's Republic of China tried to 
          illegally influence the 1996 Presidential Election.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``People's Republic of China and U.S. 
Election Investigation Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. INDEPENDENT COUNSEL FOR INVESTIGATION OF CHINESE INFLUENCE ON 
              1996 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

    (a) Appointment.--Within 90 days of the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Attorney General shall appoint an independent counsel in 
the manner independent counsels were appointed under chapter 40 of 
title 28, United States Code, but without regard for the preliminary 
investigation requirement. Such an appointment shall be made for a term 
of 2 years. During that period, an independent counsel appointed under 
this subsection shall have all the authority, jurisdiction, and 
responsibilities of an independent counsel appointed under such chapter 
before its termination.
    (b) Authority.--An independent counsel appointed under subsection 
(a) shall undertake a comprehensive investigation of--
            (1) the actions taken by officials from the People's 
        Republic of China in connection with the 1996 Presidential 
        Election to determine if such actions were illegal; and
            (2) the actions taken by high ranking officers of the 
        Federal government in connection with financial contributions 
        made by officials from the People's Republic of China in 
        connection with the 1996 Presidential Election to determine if 
        such actions violated any Federal law.
    (c) Report.--An independent counsel appointed under subsection (a) 
shall make a report and terminate the independent counsel's 
investigation as if such chapter 40 applied.
                                 <all>
```
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 09-0196

((((((((((((((((

JAY SANDON COOPER v. WILLIAM B. COCHRAN, ET AL.

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition For Review

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.The petitioner’s motion to extend time to file petition for review, filed on March 9, 2009, is **ABATED**.

2.The motion is removed from the Court's active docket.  It is the parties’ responsibility to immediately notify this Court once the court of appeals rules on Mr. Cooper’s motion for reconsideration.  

Done at the City of Austin, this 26th day of March, 2009.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Jessica Hamby, Deputy Clerk
§ 5.26 Training, examination, and assignment. ( a ) The Commandant will prescribe, through the Coast Guard Auxiliary directives referenced in § 5.9, the type of training, qualifications, and examinations required before a member of the Auxiliary will be deemed qualified to perform certain duties, and will prescribe the circumstances and manner in which members of the Auxiliary will be authorized to perform regular and emergency duties.
( b ) The Commandant may authorize members of the Auxiliary to pursue correspondence courses and distance-learning courses conducted by the Coast Guard Education and Training Quota Management Command or other authorized Coast Guard providers and to attend other courses and training available to members of the Coast Guard or Coast Guard Reserve.
[USCG-1999-6712, 80 FR 3476, Jan. 23, 2015, as amended at USCG-2023-0759, 89 FR 22947, Apr. 3, 2024]