alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | Definitions.  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings assigned to them in the Lease. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Parties.  Lessee is amended to Viasystems Corporation, formerly known as Merix Corporation and successor in interest to Merix San Jose, Inc. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Term.  The Original Term is extended an additional one (1) year and nine (9) months, such that the Expiration Date of the Lease is amended to June 30, 2012. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | Base Rent.  The Base Rent is amended to $11,687 per month for the duration of this Amendment |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | Effectiveness of Lease.  Except as set forth in this Amendment, all provisions of the Lease shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect and are incorporated herein by reference.  In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Lease and the provisions of this Amendment, the Lease shall govern and control. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6.   | Binding Effect.  This Amendment shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of Lessor and Lessee and their respective successors, assignees and representatives. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Lessor: KML Fremont Investors LLC   BY:_______________________________Name:Title: | Lessee: Viasystems Corporation   BY:_/s/ Daniel J. WeberName:  Daniel J. WeberTitle:  Vice President and Secretary |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, David A. Berg, Chief Executive Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of January, 2011.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ David A. Berg              |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: David A. Berg            |   |
|   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |   |
|        |                                |        |  |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### EDWARD K. TOWNSEND, Appellant, *v.*DAVID M. BRUNDAGE, Respondent.

*Trespass*— *property damaged try—how vakie of determined.*

Upon the trial of an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the damages occasioned by cattle of -the defendant entering on his land, and destroying his grass and apples, a witness was asked: “To the best of your knowledge, were there 100 bushels of apples there?” *Held,*that the question was proper, and that it was not objectionable as calling for the opinion of the witness. *Morehouse*v. *Matthews*(2 N. Y., 515), *Armstrong*v. *Smith*(44 Barb., 120) distinguished.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan county, reversing a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, recovered in a Justice’s Court.

*Groo & Wiggins,*for the appellant.

*R. J. Jelliff,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment of the County Court reversed, and that of the justice affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000004507
<NAME> ORANGE-CO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (609)
<INVENTORY>                                     40,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,846
<PP&E>                                         169,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 197,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,618
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,218
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   197,780
<SALES>                                         25,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,710
<CGS>                                          (26,745)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (26,745)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,229
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (731)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,995)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,035)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,960)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,960)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.19)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
AsiaInfo-Linkage, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve Zhang, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|               
|/s/ Steve Zhang
|                |  | Steve Zhang            
|                |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                | 
|                |  | February 28, 2011
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECURITISATION ADVISORY SERVICES PTY. LIMITED
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


         The  undersigned  officer  of  Securitisation  Advisory  Services  Pty.
Limited,  a  company  organized  under the laws of New  South  Wales,  Australia
("SAS"), hereby certifies on behalf of SAS and on his own behalf for purposes of
the Class A-1 Mortgage Backed Floating Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

         1.       I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of SAS;

         2.       I am duly  authorized  to execute and deliver  this  Officer's
                  Certificate on behalf of SAS; and

         3.       To the best of my knowledge,  the Issuer  Trustee has complied
                  with  all  conditions  and  covenants  under  the  transaction
                  documents  for the Series  2000-1G  Medallion  Trust  issue of
                  Notes for the period between July 1, 2001 and June 30, 2002.

         Capitalized  terms used and not defined  herein shall have the meanings
assigned   to  such  terms  in  the   Prospectus   Supplement   related  to  the
above-referenced issue of Notes.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of December 20, 2002.


                                      By:    /S/ GEOFFREY MICHAEL STEEL
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Name:   Geoffrey Michael Steel
                                         Title:  Director
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Clifford Carl LEE.

No. 16081.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 1958.

Clinton G. Richards, U. S. Atty., and Lyle E. Cheever, Asst. U. S. Atty., Sioux Falls, S. D., for appellant.

Agor, Bantz & Siegel, Aberdeen, S. D., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on request for dismissal of appeal filed by appellant.
(LOGO) KPMG

10 South Broadway
Suite 900
St Louis, MO 63102-1761
Telephone 314 444 1400
Fax 314 444 1470


Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors
Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.:

We have  examined  management's  assertion  about  Citicorp  Mortgage,  Inc. (an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup) and  subsidiaries'  (the Company)
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers  as of and  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  1999  included  in the
accompanying  management  assertion.  Management  is  responsible  for  Citicorp
Mortgage,   Inc.'s  compliance  with  those  minimum  servicing  standards.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about Citicorp
Mortgage, Inc.'s compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about Citicorp Mortgage,  Inc.'s compliance
with the minimum servicing  standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination on Citicorp  Mortgage,  Inc.'s  compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion,  management's assertion that Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. complied in
all material respects with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended  December  31,  1999 is fairly  stated,  in all  material
respects.



KPMG LLP
March 10, 2000



KPMG LLP.KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is
a member of KPMG International, a Swiss association
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Thomas S. Astrup, Chief Financial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.    The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of April, 2011.

 

 
| By:    | /s/   Thomas S. Astrup           |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:   Thomas S. Astrup         |   |
|   | Title:   Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
## Draft Proposal CB-33

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Fan Horsepower Exceptions Simplified (CB-33)

Objective: Simplify provisions for motor nameplate horsepower by replacing complicated exceptions

with positive statements of what is required.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C403.2.10.2 as follows:

C403.2.10.2 Motor nameplate horsepower. For each fan, the fan brake horse power shall be indicated

on the design documents and the selected motor shall be no larger than the first available motor size

greater than the following: brake horsepower. The fan brake horse power shall be indicated on the

design documents to allow for compliance verification by the code official.

Exceptions:

1. For fans less than 6 bhp (4413 W), 1.5 x the fan brake horsepower . where the fir st available motor

larger than the brake horsepower has a nameplate rating within 50 pe rcent of the bhp, selection of the

next larger nameplate motor size is allowed.

2. For fans 6 bhp (4413 W) and larger, 1.3 x the fan brake horsepower

. where the first available

motor larger than the bhp has a nameplate rating w ithin 30 percent of the bhp, selection of the next

larger nameplate motor size is allowed.

Reason: The complex exceptions are replaced with a positive statement of what is required. This will

reduce confusion over the maximum horsepower requirement.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
§ 3050.35 Financial reports. ( a ) The reports in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section shall be provided annually at the time indicated.
( b ) Annual Report of the Postmaster General (when released to the public);
( c ) Congressional Budget Submission and supporting workpapers, including Summary Tables SE 1, 2, and 6 (within 7 days of the submission of the Federal Budget by the President to the Congress); and
( d ) Integrated Financial Plan (within 7 days of approval by the Board of Governors).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA T-matrix theory of galactic heavy-ion fragmentationThe theory of galactic heavy ion fragmentation is furthered by incorporating a T matrix approach into the description of the three step process of abrasion, ablation, and final state interations. The connection between this T matrix and the interaction potential is derived. For resonant states, the substitution of complex energies for real energies in the transition rate is formerly justified for up to third order processes. The previously developed abrasion-ablation fragmentation theory is rederived from first principles and is shown to result from time ordering, classical probability, and zero width resonance approximations. Improvements in the accuracy of the total fragmentation cross sections require an alternative to the latter two approximations. A Lorentz invariant differential abrasion-ablation cross section is derived which explicitly includes the previously derived abrasion total cross sections. It is demonstrated that spectral and angular distributions can be obtained from the general Lorentz invariant form.Document ID19850009381Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsNorbury, J. W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Townsend, L. W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Deutchman, P. A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1985Subject CategoryNuclear And High-Energy PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2363L-15833NAS 1.60:2363Accession Number85N17690Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 199-20-76Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850009381.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
ACL/AoD Developmental Disabilities Councils (SCDD) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2022 Final Allocation

9/6/2022

State/Territory

Developmental 

Disabilities 

Councils (SCDD)

Alabama $1,287,864

Alaska $527,570

Arizona $1,500,930

Arkansas $769,002

California $8,014,307

Colorado $1,155,510

Connecticut $729,370

Delaware $527,570

District of Columbia $527,570

Florida $4,363,460

Georgia $2,160,013

Hawaii $527,570

Idaho $527,570

Illinois $2,642,154

Indiana $1,488,546

Iowa $774,176

Kansas $614,590

Kentucky $1,195,270

Louisiana $1,380,778

Maine $527,570

Maryland $1,206,492

Massachusetts $1,424,070

Michigan $2,531,242

Minnesota $1,123,234

Mississippi $923,684

Missouri $1,361,246

Montana $527,570

Nebraska $527,570

Nevada $650,181

New Hampshire $527,570

New Jersey $1,806,766

New Mexico $530,220

New York $4,139,206

North Carolina $2,155,429

North Dakota $527,570

Ohio $2,846,720

Oklahoma $905,386

Oregon $843,484

Pennsylvania $3,026,520

Rhode Island $527,570

South Carolina $1,143,720

South Dakota $527,570

Tennessee $1,470,950

Texas $5,949,986

Utah $646,672

Vermont $527,570

Virginia $1,702,352

Washington $1,533,074

West Virginia $739,342

Wisconsin $1,305,492

Wyoming $527,570

American Samoa $274,744

Guam $274,744

Northern Mariana Islands $274,744

Puerto Rico $2,506,930

Virgin Islands $274,744

TOTAL $79,033,324
#### § 3030.266 Deadline for Commission decision.

Requests under this subpart seek rate relief required by extraordinary or exceptional circumstances and will be treated with expedition at every stage. It is Commission policy to provide appropriate relief as quickly as possible consistent with statutory requirements and procedural fairness. The Commission will act expeditiously on the Postal Service's request, taking into account all written comments. In every instance, a Commission decision will be issued within 90 days of the filing of an exigent request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL00-80-000]

Take notice that on June 2, 2000, Indeck Maine Energy, LLC submitted for filing, pursuant to Section 206 of the Federal Power Act, a Complaint Requesting Fast Track Processing And Request for Immediate Action against the ISO New England, Inc. 

Any person desiring to be heard or to protests this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before June 12, 2000.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14711  Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M