alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-00-054]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Wappoo Creek (ICW), Charleston, 
SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Wappoo Creek (SC Route 171) drawbridge across the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway, mile 470.8, Charleston, Charleston County, South Carolina. 
This deviation allows the drawbridge owner or operator to open only a 
single leaf. This temporary deviation is required from June 22, 2000 
until August 19, 2000, to allow the bridge owner to safely conduct 
necessary repairs to the drawbridge. Double leaf openings are available 
with a one-hour notice to the bridge tender.

DATES: This deviation is effective from June 22, 2000 to August 19, 
2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Chief, Operations 
Section, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Section at (305) 415-
6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Wappoo Creek (SC 171) drawbridge across 
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Charleston, has a vertical 
clearance of 33 feet above mean high water (MHW) and 38 feet above mean 
low water (MLW) measured at the fenders in the closed position. On May 
22, 2000, Coastal Marine Construction, Incorporated, the contractor 
representing the drawbridge owner, requested a deviation from the 
current operating regulation in 33 CFR 117.5 which requires drawbridge 
to open promptly and fully when a request to open is given. This 
temporary deviation was requested to allow necessary repairs to the 
drawbridge.
    The District Commander has granted a temporary deviation for the 
purpose of conducting repairs to the drawbridge. Under this deviation, 
the Wappoo Creek (SC Route 171) Drawbridge need only open one leaf of 
the drawbridge except when a double leaf opening is requested with a 
one-hour notice. The single-leaf openings are scheduled for a period of 
10 days beginning on June 22, 2000 and ending on July 2, 2000 and a 
period of 41 days beginning on July 6, 2000 and ending on August 19, 
2000.

    Dated: June 2, 2000.
Greg Shapley,
Chief, Bridge Branch, Seventh Coast Guard District 2.
[FR Doc. 00-14653 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley D. Tilden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                      
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                        | 
|By                      |  | /s/ Bradley D. Tilden
|Bradley D. Tilden      
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|August 14, 2006
! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 !! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 "! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 #! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 $! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 %! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 &! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 '! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 (! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 )! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 !! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 "! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 #! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 $! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 %! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 &! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 '! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 (! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 ! )! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 !! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 ! !! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 ! "! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 ! #! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 ! $! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 ! %! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 ! &! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 ! '! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 ! (! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 " )! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 "! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 " !! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 " "! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 " #! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 " $! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 " %! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 " &! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 " '! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 " (! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 # )! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 #! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 # !! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 # "! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 # #! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 # $! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 # %! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 # &! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 # '! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 # (! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 $ )! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 $

2 ' + * / 0 ' 2 ' )

3 ) ' 4 +

3 5 6 ' 7 0 8 ' 0 7 ) 7 )

9 8 ' 0 7! " # $ & ' ( ) ' * ( + , - . + ) / + 0 , #

- # 1 $ !

6 ' : 5 ; < ' =

> ? @ A = B = > @ C D E B = A E F B @ G @ B B H C = > ? B H E H > > = B D D I J > H E D E I

> ? K L 1 K H B M N @ A J = > = > N
> @ C D E ? F H O F N N D F H M ? > H H P I D N @ D Q

Q = N @ > G D E = O H
§ 959.6 Revocations of suspension. ( a ) The General Counsel, or a member of the General Counsel's staff as may be designated, may initiate a revocation of the suspension of the Private Express Statutes as provided in part 320 of this title as to any person, by filing, in triplicate, a petition with the Recorder which ( 1 ) Names the person involved;
( 2 ) States the legal authority under which the proceeding is initiated;
( 3 ) States the facts in a manner sufficient to enable the person named to make answer thereto; and,
( 4 ) Recommends the issuance of an appropriate order.
( b ) *Answer.* ( 1 ) The person named in the petition (designated the “Respondent” in these rules) shall file an answer with the Recorder within 15 days after being served with a copy of the petition in accordance with § 959.8.
( 2 ) The answer shall contain a concise statement admitting, denying, or explaining each of the allegations set forth in the petition.
( 3 ) Any facts alleged in the petition which are not denied, or which are expressly admitted in the answer, may be considered as proved, and no further evidence regarding these facts need be adduced at the hearing.
( 4 ) The answer shall be signed personally by an individual respondent, or in the case of a partnership, by one of the partners, or, in the case of a corporation or association, by an officer thereof.
( 5 ) The answer shall set forth the respondent's address and the name and address of respondent's attorney, if respondent is represented by counsel.
( 6 ) The answer shall affirmatively state whether the respondent will appear in person or by counsel at the hearing.
( 7 ) If the respondent does not desire to appear at the hearing in person or by counsel, the matter shall be deemed submitted for determination pursuant to paragraph (b) of § 959.10.
[39 FR 33213, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended at 63 FR 66052, Dec. 1, 1998]
SIF Propensity Score Matched 

(PSM) Reporting Checklist 

July 2013 

CNCS Office of Research & Evaluation

This is a general checklist of information which SIF intermediaries and subgrantees should consider when 

reviewing evaluation reports containing Propensity Score Matched (PSM) approaches, and which CNCS hopes 

to have for such evaluations. Use the checklist if you find it helpful and modify it to fit your needs. Note that 

PSM approaches are used for constructing comparison groups in impact evaluations with a quasiexperimental design. These impact studies estimate program impacts by comparing outcomes for participants 

receiving the intervention with outcomes in the absence of the intervention, which is represented by the 

experiences of the comparison group participants. 

PSM Steps Information to Collect and Communicate Included in 

report?

Propensity Score 

Construction

Variables used in Propensity Score development 

How variables used were measured 

Variables associated with treatment group membership 

Distribution of Propensity Scores in the treatment and comparison 

groups



Matching Processes and 

Type

Matching procedure used (e.g. nearest neighbor, Kernel, Caliper) 

Proportion of cases matched 

Size of differences between treatment and comparison groups in 

observed pre-treatment characteristics after matching



Analysis Approaches

Analysis used to evaluation program impact 

How propensity scores were used in the analysis (e.g., as a 

variable, as a weight)



Results are provided for both matched and unmatched samples 

Special Issues

If the study design contains multiple levels (e.g., students within 

classrooms), how the PSM takes these levels into account 



If there are multiple treatment conditions, how the PSM takes this 

into account 


§ 3030.121 Postal Service rate adjustment filing. ( a ) In every instance in which the Postal Service determines to exercise its statutory authority to adjust rates for a class of mail, the Postal Service shall comply with the requirements specified in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
( b ) The Postal Service shall take into consideration how the planned rate adjustments are in accordance with the provisions of 39 U.S.C. chapter 36.
( c ) The Postal Service shall provide public notice of its planned rate adjustments in a manner reasonably designed to inform the mailing community and the general public that it intends to adjust rates no later than 90 days prior to the planned implementation date of the rate adjustments.
( d ) The Postal Service shall file a request to review its notice of rate adjustment with the Commission no later than 90 days prior to the planned implementation date of the rate adjustment.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37395-37396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14947]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Research To Strengthen Occupational Safety and 
Health Surveillance, RFA OH-00-005

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.

    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Research to Strengthen Occupational 
Safety and Health Surveillance, RFA OH-00-005.
    Times and Dates:

9 a.m.-9:30 a.m., July 10, 2000 (Open).
9:30 a.m.-5 p.m., July 10, 2000 (Closed).
8 a.m.-Noon, July 11, 2000 (Closed).
    Place: Embassy Suites, 1900 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, Virginia 
22314.
    Status: Portions of the meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Associate Director for 
Management and Operations, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
RFA-OH-00-005.
    Contact Person for More Information: Michael J. Galvin, Jr., 
Ph.D., Health Science Administrator, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
1600 Clifton Road, N.E., m/s D30 Atlanta, Georgia 30333. Telephone 
404/639-3525, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c11081b4f3c1f181f521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="066b7261354665626528616970">[email protected]</span></a>.

[[Page 37396]]

    The Director, Management Analysis and Services office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: June 8, 2000.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 00-14947 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5234

To amend the Hmong Veterans’ Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the

applicability of that Act to certain former spouses of deceased Hmong

veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 2000

Mr. RADANOVICH (for himself, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr.

HUNTER, Mr. HERGER, Mr. VENTO, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, and

Mr. DOOLEY of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Hmong Veterans’ Naturalization Act of 2000

to extend the applicability of that Act to certain former

spouses of deceased Hmong veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5234 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HMONG VETERANS’ NATU2 RALIZATION ACT OF 2000 TO CERTAIN

3 FORMER SPOUSES OF DECEASED HMONG

4 VETERANS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2 of the Hmong Veterans’

6 Naturalization Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–207; 114

7 Stat. 316; 8 U.S.C. 1423 note) is amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the

9 end;

10 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at

11 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new

13 paragraph:

14 ‘‘(3) who—

15 ‘‘(A) satisfies the requirement of para16 graph (1)(A); and

17 ‘‘(B) is the surviving spouse of a person

18 described in paragraph (1)(B) which described

19 person was killed or died in Laos, Thailand, or

20 Vietnam.’’.

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3 of such

22 Act is amended by striking ‘‘or (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘, (2),

23 or (3)’’.

24 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION.—Section 6 of such

25 Act is amended by adding at the end the following new

26 sentence: ‘‘In the case of a person described in section
3

•HR 5234 IH

1 2(3), the application referred to in the preceding sentence,

2 and appropriate fees, shall be filed not later than 18

3 months after the date of the enactment of this sentence.’’.

Æ
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

________________________________________________ 

LARRY KLAYMAN et al.,      ) 

)    Civil Action No. 06‐CV‐00670 (CKK) 

Plaintiff,         )  

) 

v.       ) 

            ) 

JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. et al,    )             

                                                                                  ) 

Defendants.                     ) 

_______________________________________________  ) 

ELHAM SATAKI, 

   

    Plaintiff, 

  v. 

BROADCASTING BOARD OF 

GOVERNORS, et al.

    Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 10‐0534 (CKK)

PRAECIPE

This is to advise the court that the disciplinary complaint against Judge Colleen 

Kolar Kotelly is being resubmitted to conform with the procedural rules, i.e., Rule 5 

of the Rules of Judicial Conduct and Judicial Disability Proceedings. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By:       Larry Klayman ///_____________                                              

Larry Klayman, Esq.  

(DC Bar No.  334581)             

KLAYMAN LAW FIRM                                                                          

             2000 Pennsylvania Avenue,  

N.W., Suite 345                                       

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Tel: 310‐595‐0800 

Email – leklayman@yahoo.com  

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 1:10-cv-00534-CKK Document 94 Filed 03/01/11 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3789

___________________________

James P. Kenefick

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Francis Howell School District; Eric Pavia; Mike Deters

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: July 28, 2014

Filed: July 31, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
James Kenefick appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil

1

complaint upon a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion. Upon careful de

novo review, see Minn. Majority v. Mansky, 708 F.3d 1051, 1055 (8th Cir.) (standard

of review), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 824 (2013), we agree with the district court that

Kenefick failed to state a facially plausible claim, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662,

678 (2009). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Teleconnect Inc. and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President and the
principal accounting and financial officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      January 12, 2010
              /s/
      Dirk L. BenschopDirk
      L. Benschop, Director, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial
      Officer and principal accounting
officer
Docket ID #: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049Topic ContentFilename:Ref.Date Time FROM TO Brief Description1 30-Mar-10 11:23 AM OMB EPA Interagency Comments OMB Compilation of Interagency Comments 2010-03-30_am1128_OMB2EPA_Interagency Comments_ClearanceNPRM.pdf2 9-Apr-10 1:03 PM EPA OMB Interagency Comments EPA Response to Interagency Comments 2010-04-09_pm0103_EPA2OMB_Response2InteragencyComments.pdf3 13-Apr-10 10:43 AM OMB EPA HUD Comments Interagency Comments Submitted by HUD 2010-04-13_am1043_OMB2EPA_HUD Comments_ClearanceNPRM.pdf4 16-Apr-10 4:00 PM OMB EPA OMB Comments Draft NPRM Health Effects Language 2010-04-16_pm0400_OMB2EPA_HealthEffects_HandCarriedEdits.pdf5 20-Apr-10 12:19 PM EPA OMB Interagency Comments EPA Revisions to Economic Analysis 2010-04-20_pm1219_EPA2OMB_EA Revisions_ClearanceNPRM.pdf6 21-Apr-10 9:02 AM EPA OMBOMB RequestsDraft NPRM Costs-Benefits Summary Table 2010-04-21_am0902_EPA2OMB_LRRP_ClearanceNPRM_New table.pdf7 21-Apr-10 12:24 PM OMB EPAOMB RequestsEdits to Costs-Benefits Summary Table 2010-04-21_pm1224_OMB2EPA_SuggestedTablesFax.pdf8 21-Apr-10 1:29 PM EPA OMB OMB-sponsored Requests EPA Revisions to Draft NPRM 2010-04-21_pm0129_EPA2OMB_NPRM Revisions_LRRP_ClearanceNPRM.pdf9 21-Apr-10 3:37 PM EPA OMBOMB RequestsEPA Edits - Costs-Benefits Summary Table 2010-04-21_pm0337_EPA2OMB_ClearanceNPRM_NewTable_revised.pdf10 22-Apr-10 9:27 AM EPA OMB OMB Comments EPA Edits - NPRM Health Effects Language 2010-04-22_am0927_EPA2OMB_NPRM Revisions_HealthEffectsEdits.pdf1122-Apr-10 6:42 PM EPA OMB Final Markup - Draft NPRM Final EPA Markup of Draft NPRM2010-04-22_pm0642_EPA2OMB_NPRM Revisions_FinalMarkups.pdf1213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940Sent to?NOTE: The files on the CD ROM are identified by the date and time of the written communications, the sending Agency, and a short topic. For example, the first document in the list is identified on the CD ROM underthe file name "2010-03-30-am1128_OMB2EPA_Interagency Comments_ClearanceNPRM.pdf". You may access these documents at the docket facility by either requesting a copy of an individual document fromthis list or a copy of the CD ROM with all of these documents. [Under "TO:" only the agency that the message was primarily addressed to is listed, but other active interagency review participants may also have beencopied.]TSCA §411 Documentation of Written Interactions w/ OMB & Other Agencies About the Final RuleTable of ContentsLead; Clearance and Clearance Testing Requirements for the Renovation, Repair and Painting Program - PROPOSED RuleWhenRIN 2070-AJ57; Docket ID #: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-00491-LRRP-Clearance_NPRM_411docket_Table-of-Content.xlsPage 1 of 1