alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 510 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 105
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 510

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 1999

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to John R. and 
  Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land so as to 
    correct an error in the patent issued to their predecessors in 
                               interest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF LOWE FAMILY PROPERTY.

    (a) Conveyance.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary of 
the Interior is directed to issue, without consideration, a quitclaim 
deed to John R. and Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, to 
the land described in subsection (b): Provided, That all minerals 
underlying such land are hereby reserved to the United States.
    (b) Land Description.--The land referred to in subsection (a) is 
the approximately 40-acre parcel located in the SW\1/4\SE\1/4\ of 
Section 11, Township 51 North, Range 96 West, 6th Principal Meridian, 
Wyoming.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 105

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 510

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to John R. and 
  Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land so as to 
    correct an error in the patent issued to their predecessors in 
                               interest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 5, 1999

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-CR-20521

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs.

THEODORE FARNSWORTH and

J. MITCHELL LOWE

Defendants.

 /

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

The undersigned Trial Attorney, Katherine McCarthy, hereby appears as counsel for the 

United States of America in the above-captioned case.

Respectfully submitted,

GLENN S. LEON

CHIEF, FRAUD SECTION

CRIMINAL DIVISION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

By: /s/ Katherine McCarthy 

Katherine McCarthy

Trial Attorney

Florida Special Bar No. A5502801

United States Department of Justice

Criminal Division, Fraud Section

1400 New York Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20005

Tel: (202) 714-7932

Email: Katherine.McCarthy@usdoj.gov

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2024 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Katherine McCarthy, certify that the foregoing has been served on all attorneys of record 

in the above-captioned case, either via the CM/ECF electronic filing system or via email.

By: /s/ Katherine McCarthy 

Katherine McCarthy

Trial Attorney

Florida Special Bar No. A5502801

United States Department of Justice

Criminal Division, Fraud Section

1400 New York Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20005

Tel: (202) 714-7932

Email: Katherine.McCarthy@usdoj.gov

Dated: October 21, 2024

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/21/2024 Page 2 of 2
#### *Meze v. Howver.

October, 1829.

(Absent GHimmn, J.)

Executions — Assignment — Forthcoming Bond Taken in Favor ot Assignee — VaSidity.*—A Ü. fa. i.s sued out by M. &M. on judgment recovered by them: they indorse on tne writ, that it is for benelit of H. ; the sheriff levies it. and takes forthcoming bond payable to H.: Hionu, the bond is naught.

Mays & M’Clung recovered judgment against Meze, in the circuit court of Green-brier, and thereupon sued out a fieri facias, on which they indorsed, that the judgment *158and execution were for the benefit of Howver. The sheriff levied the execution on' the defendant’s property, and took a forthcoming bond from him, payable, not to the plaintiffs Mays & M’Clung, but to Howver. The bond was forfeited: and Howver moved the circuit court, in his own name, for judgment and award of execution upon it; and the court awarded execution accordingly. Meze applied to this court for a supersedeas, which was allowed.

Daniel, for the plaintiff in error.

The bond is naught. The statute requiring forthcoming bonds to be taken payable to the creditor, intends, that they shall be made payable to the plaintiff on the record ; 1 Rev. Code, ch. 1'34, g 1, 15, 16, p. 524, 530. The bond must pursue the judgment and execution, otherwise it has no foundation to support it: it is, in truth, a part of the process of execution.-

No counsel for the defendant in error.

*

Executions — Assignment— Right ol Assignee to Sue in His Own Name. — On this question, *see. foot-note*to Tolson v. Elwes, 1 Leigh 436. The principal case is cited in Burnett v. Harwell, 3 Leigh 92; Leightons v. Hinchman, 1 Gratt. 157, and *note:*Hall v. Wadsworth. 35 *W.*Va. 379, 14 S. E. Rep. 6.

PER CURIAM.

The statute first pro-

vides, that all persons who recover judgment in any court of record, may, at their election, prosecute writs of fieri facias &c. and then, that if the owner of the- goods (taken on a fi. fa.) shall give sufficient security to the sheriff to have the goods forthcoming at the day of sale, it shall be lawful for the sheriff to take a bond from the debtor and sureties, payable to the creditor, reciting &c. The creditor to whom the bond is to be made *payable, is the person entitled to sue out the execution.; the plaintiff on the record. No other person can be known to the officer, or to the court itself, as the creditor. To no other person, then, can the bond be taken. In Downman v. Chinn, 2 Wash. 189, a forthcoming bond made payable to the sheriff, was given up, on all hands, as faulty. The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed, and the forthcoming bond quashed.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 652 

Designating the week beginning September 8, 2008, as ‘‘National Assisted 

Living Week’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2008 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself and Mr. THUNE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating the week beginning September 8, 2008, as 

‘‘National Assisted Living Week’’. 

Whereas the number of elderly and disabled citizens of the 

United States is increasing dramatically; 

Whereas assisted living is a long-term care service that fosters choice, dignity, independence, and autonomy in the 

elderly and disabled across the United States; 

Whereas the National Center for Assisted Living created National Assisted Living Week; 

Whereas the theme of National Assisted Living Week 2008 

is ‘‘Filling Life with Love’’; and 

Whereas this theme highlights the privilege, value, and responsibility of passing the legacies of the lives of the elderly and disabled of the United States down through the 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 652 IS 

generations that care for and love them: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates the week beginning September 8, 

3 2008, as ‘‘National Assisted Living Week’’; and 

4 (2) urges all people of the United States— 

5 (A) to visit friends and loved ones who re6 side at assisted living facilities; and 

7 (B) to learn more about assisted living 

8 services, including how assisted living services 

9 benefit communities in the United States. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 3011.103 Commission action to determine non-public treatment. ( a ) The inadvertent failure of a submitter to concomitantly provide all documents required by § 3011.200(a) does not prevent the Commission from according appropriate confidentiality to non-public information contained with any materials provided to the Commission. Information requests as described in § 3010.170 of this chapter, preliminary notices, or interim orders may be issued to help the Commission determine the non-public treatment, if any, to be accorded to the materials claimed by any person to be non-public.
( b ) Upon motion by any person, the Commission may issue an order containing a description of and timeframe for the non-public treatment, if any, to be accorded to materials claimed by any person to be non-public.
( c ) Upon its own motion, the Commission may issue notice of its preliminary determination concerning the appropriate degree of protection, if any, to be accorded to materials claimed by any person to be non-public. A response is due within seven calendar days of issuance of the preliminary determination, unless the Commission otherwise provides. No reply to a response shall be filed, unless the Commission otherwise provides. Pending the Commission's resolution of the preliminary determination, information designated as non-public will be accorded non-public treatment. The Commission will enter an order determining what non-public treatment, if any, will be accorded to the materials after the response period described in this paragraph has expired. The determination of the Commission shall follow the applicable standard described in § 3011.104.
[83 FR 31281, July 3, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 9641, Feb. 19, 2020; 88 FR 37154, June 7, 2023]
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 16a0200n.06

No. 15-1884

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

XAVIER VELVIE MCCARTY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF 

MICHIGAN

BEFORE: GUY, BOGGS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Xavier Velvie McCarty appeals the sentence imposed after he was 

convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and 

theft of firearms from a licensed dealer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(m). The charges arose 

from an incident in which McCarty broke into a building occupied by a licensed firearms dealer, 

smashed a glass display case, and moved numerous firearms from the case into a duffel bag. 

Police arrived at the building during these acts, McCarty abandoned the duffel bag, and fled

through a window. He was captured nearby.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, McCarty pleaded guilty to the felon-in-possession charge. 

The district court determined that McCarty’s total offense level was 23, which included a twolevel increase under USSG § 2K2.1(b)(4)(A) because the firearms were stolen. Based on his 
No. 15-1884

United States v. McCarty

- 2 -

total offense level of 23 and criminal history category of IV, McCarty’s guidelines range of 

imprisonment was 70 to 87 months. The district court sentenced him to 70 months in prison.

On appeal, McCarty argues that the district court erred by applying the two-level 

enhancement under § 2K2.1(b)(4)(A). He contends that the firearms in question were not stolen 

because he did not remove them from the building. McCarty also argues that, under the rule of 

lenity, the two-level enhancement should not apply because the meaning of “stolen” in 

§ 2K2.1(b)(4)(A) is ambiguous.

We review the district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. 

United States v. Jackson, 401 F.3d 747, 748 (6th Cir. 2005). Section 2K2.1(b)(4)(A) provides 

for a two-level enhancement if an illegally possessed firearm “was stolen.”

McCarty waived the argument that the firearms were not stolen by conceding during the 

sentencing hearing that the firearms “gained the character of being stolen” when McCarty

removed them from the display case. See United States v. Priddy, 808 F.3d 676, 681 (6th Cir. 

2015). And because McCarty did not raise his claim based on the rule of lenity in the district 

court, it is barred by the appellate-waiver provision in his plea agreement, which waived his right 

to raise on appeal any challenge to the district court’s determination of the guidelines range that 

was not raised during sentencing. See United States v. Hockenberry, 730 F.3d 645, 671 (6th Cir. 

2013).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM McCarty’s sentence.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5312 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5312

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to protect children from drug 
                              traffickers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2000

Mr. McCollum (for himself, Mr. Rogan, Mr. Mica, Mr. Nethercutt, and Mr. 
  Sessions) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to protect children from drug 
                              traffickers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Our Children From Drugs 
Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR USING MINORS TO 
              DISTRIBUTE DRUGS.

    Section 420 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 861) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``3 years''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``5 years''.

SEC. 3. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR DISTRIBUTING DRUGS TO 
              MINORS.

    Section 418 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 859) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``3 years''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``5 years''.

SEC. 4. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR DRUG TRAFFICKING IN 
              OR NEAR A SCHOOL OR OTHER PROTECTED LOCATION.

    Section 419 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 860) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``3 years''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``three years'' each 
        place that term appears and inserting ``5 years''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 80.1355 Tillamook Bay, OR.

A line drawn across the seaward extremities of the Tillamook Bay Entrance Jetties.

[CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7788, Mar. 6, 1986]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-81294-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING

Plaintiff Donald J. Trump, through the undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice that it is 

providing to the Special Master Plaintiff Donald J. Trump’s Response to the Government’s Brief 

on Global Issues. Consistent with the Government’s treatment of its Response Brief, Plaintiff will 

promptly file the corresponding Response Brief on the public docket if the Court unseals the 

underlying Global Issues Briefs.

Dated: November 12, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Lindsey Halligan .

Lindsey Halligan

Florida Bar No. 109481 

511 SE 5th Avenue

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Email: lindseyhalligan@outlook.com

James M. Trusty

Ifrah Law PLLC

1717 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 650

Washington, D.C. 20006

Telephone: (202) 524-4176

Email: jtrusty@ifrahlaw.com

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 179 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/12/2022 Page 1 of 3
2

Christopher M. Kise

Chris Kise & Associates, P.A.

201 East Park Avenue, 5th Floor

Tallahassee, FL 32301

Telephone: (850) 270-0566

Email: chris@ckise.net

M. Evan Corcoran 

Silverman Thompson Slutkin White, LLC

400 East Pratt Street – Suite 900 

Baltimore, MD 21202 

Telephone: (410) 385-2225 

Email: ecorcoran@silvermanthompson.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff Donald J. Trump

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 179 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/12/2022 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 12, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF.

/s/ Lindsey Halligan .

Lindsey Halligan

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 179 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/12/2022 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Mitch Ashlock, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of First
Federal of Olathe Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") certifies in his capacity as an
officer of the Company that he has reviewed the Annual Report of the Company on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 and that to the best of his
knowledge:

1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



March 28, 2003                            /s/ Mitch Ashlock
----------------------                    --------------------------------------
Date                                      Mitch Ashlock
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.3


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**






In
      connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of U-Haul
      International, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on November 8, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Robert T. Peterson, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




U-HAUL
      INTERNATIONAL, INC.,


a
      Nevada
      corporation




/s/
      Robert T. Peterson


Robert
      T.
      Peterson


Chief
      Financial Officer


Date:
      November 8, 2006
EXHIBIT 32

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
Safer Shot, Inc. for the period ended, September 30, 2009, (the "Report")
I, John Lund, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Safer Shot, Inc.



Date: January 6, 2011                 /s/John Lund
                             -------------------------------------------
                                         John Lund
                                         President
                                   (Principal Executive)
§ 80.845 Galveston, TX to Freeport, TX. ( a ) A line drawn from Galveston North Jetty Light 6A to Galveston South Jetty Light 5A.
( b ) A line formed by the centerline of the highway bridge over San Luis Pass.
( c ) Lines formed by the centerlines of the highway bridges over the inlets to Christmas Bay (Cedar Cut) and Drum Bay.
( d ) A line drawn from the seaward extremity of the Freeport North Jetty to Freeport Entrance Light 6; thence Freeport Entrance Light 7; thence the seaward extremity of Freeport South Jetty.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, as amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7787, Mar. 6, 1986]
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ- OW-20 10 - 0824 DCN CBM00 656 THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGIa 8 20

1595 WYNKOOP STREET 12 J j 2

o NVER, a 80202-1129

Phone 800-227-8917

http://www.cpa.gov/region08

DO KET NO.: CAA-08-2011-0020

8:

IN THE MATTER OF:

QUIA

Resp ndellt

, ( ) I

)

)

) ROEI RA TI J I T MOTIO

) TO AME D ADMINISTRATIVE

) OMPLAl T 0 E T

) AGREEMENT AND FINAL ORDER

)

)

On June 27 20 12~ the Partie tiled a "Modified Joint M tion to Amend Administrative

Complaint and Consent A&'Teement'. The motion requests that certain paragraphs oftne

Amended Agreement be substituted to reflect changes. The motion also requests that Appendix

/\ includ . a 11 w Tabl A-5 (0 in<;lude on additional s urce. The Amended Agr 111 nt aJ 0

refle ts an incr ase in the p nalty u to the addition ofthis source. Th Attachment to the Joint

Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint and Consent Agreement is incorporated into the

August 29, 2011 Agreement.

1'b Respond ot i h "cby ORDERED to omply with all f tbe terms f dl Am nded

Agr em nt, effl ctiv immediately upon rec ipt by R pond n1 f this Am oded

Agreement and Final Order.

ORDE D Till
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned cenifies that the original oCthe attached ORDER GRANTING MOl>fFlED

MOTION TO AMEND CONSENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL ORDER in the matter of

KODIAK OIL & GAS (USA) INC.; DOCKET NO.: CAA-08-201 1-0020, was filed with the

Regional Hearing Clerk on June 28, 2012;

Further, the undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of the document was delivered to

Duvid Rochlin, Senior Enforcement Attorney. U. S, EPA - Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,

Denver, CO 80202-1129. True and correct copies of the aforementioned docwnents were placed

in the United States mail and e-maiJcd on June 28, 2012, to:

Cathleen M. Osborn, Legal Counsel

Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp.

Legal Counsel

1625 Broadway, Suite 250

Denver. CO 80202

E-mailed to;

Elizabeth Whilsel

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Cincinnati Finance Center

26 W. Martin Luther King Drive (MS-0002)

Cincinnati, Ohio 45268

JUlle 28. 2012 ,_kLiL r1Jiem!>c

Tina Artemis

Paralegal/Regional Ilearing Clerk