alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alberto-Culver Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard B. Bernick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|                                     
|/s/    HOWARD B. BERNICK             
|                                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer

May 7, 2004
November 4`h, 2010

To: Lisa P. Jackson Administrator United States Environment Protection Agency Fr: Dennis Kragness Family FarmOwner Colfax, W'is. Dear Ms. Jackson, 

# R~~~ 2010NOV 10 PM12: 35 vi I ,,,- Vr 11-1 : ~y_i~U~V'C ^r~^.-,t--, Vk . I' L 

## "~~.-fS[I~AT

In late October, a petition was filed in your office by the NRECA regarding the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines rule. I ama family farmer in Wisconsin, and I support the petition.7 purchased a 225 kW

back up generator for the farm . My primary concern was power in case of an outage, but as a bonus my co-op offers a peak shaving program . Occasionally the co-op asks me to switch to standby generation in order to decrease demand on the system . For helping them out when they need it, I save about $8,600 per year on my electric bill . The rules your agency are trying to start will take away that peak alert rate my Cooperative can offer. That means $8,600out of my pocket . As a family, farm, it puts my livelihood at risk. I can use that savings for feed and vaccinations, helpingother local small businesses in mN area. This rule does notjust affect my cooperative. It affects me and other local businesses. I'd like your agency to reconsider not allowing peak shaving controls ofgenerators like mine within the proposed 100 hour limits. The request NRECA filed does not ask for more hours of operation;just to include peak shaving use within the 100 hour limit . Since 1'ma part of a Cooperative 1 see the savings and revenue fromthis type of arrangement, not them . Plus, I am helping to reduce energy demand during the peak times. This is a significant savings to my, small business. Sincerely, Dennis Kragness Colfax, Wisconsin7_

= t `r

CV C

: , ., C'1 iV

. ~l

:J ^ ^ ; r r ,r,' ~-+ N ~" ~ I >. . . . _

. .~ 1 

### :~<<~'3 4 2'
§ 957.4 Authority of the Hearing Officer. The Hearing Officer's authority includes, but is not limited to, the following: ( a ) Ruling on all motions or requests by the parties.
( b ) Issuing notices, orders, or memoranda to the parties concerning the hearing proceedings.
( c ) Conducting conferences with the parties. The Hearing Officer will prepare a Memorandum of Conference, which will be transmitted to both parties and which serves as the official record of that conference.
( d ) Determining whether an oral hearing will be conducted, and setting the place, date, and time for such a hearing.
( e ) Administering oaths or affirmations to witnesses.
( f ) Conducting the proceedings and the hearing in a manner to maintain discipline and decorum while ensuring that relevant, reliable and probative evidence is elicited, but irrelevant, immaterial or repetitious evidence is excluded. The Hearing Officer in his or her discretion may examine witnesses to ensure that a satisfactory record is developed.
( g ) Establishing the record. The weight to be attached to evidence will rest within the discretion of the Hearing Officer. Except as the Hearing Officer may otherwise order, no proof shall be received in evidence after completion of a hearing. The Hearing Officer may require either party, with appropriate notice to the other party, to submit additional evidence on any relevant matter.
( h ) Granting reasonable time extensions or other relief for good cause shown, in the Hearing Officer's sole discretion.
( i ) Issuing findings of fact. The Hearing Officer will issue findings of fact to the Vice President within 30 days from the close of the record, to the extent practicable.
§ 62.52 Automatic Identification System Aids to Navigation (AIS AtoN). ( a ) Aids to Navigation (AtoN) may be enhanced by the use of an automatic identification system (AIS). AIS is a maritime navigation safety communications protocol standardized by the International Telecommunication Union and adopted by the International Maritime Organization for the broadcast or exchange of navigation information between vessels, aircraft, and shore stations. AIS AtoN can autonomously and at fixed intervals broadcast the name, position, dimensions, type, characteristics and status from or concerning an aid to navigation.
( b ) AIS AtoN can be either physical (fitted to the AtoN), synthetic (physically fitted somewhere other than to the AtoN) or virtual (physically nonexistent, but capable of being portrayed on AIS-capable displays).
( c ) AIS AtoN can also be used to broadcast both laterally (*e.g.,* Port Hand Mark) and non-laterally significant marine safety information (*e.g.,* environmental data, tidal information, and navigation warnings).
[USCG-2005-21869, 80 FR 5329, Jan. 30, 2015, as amended by USCG-2021-0348, 87 FR 3223, Jan. 21, 2022]
Exhibit 10.1


 





SECOND AMENDMENT TO


AMENDED AND RESTATED 


2012 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


WHEREAS, DarioHealth
Corp. (the “Company”) maintains the DarioHealth Corp.’s Amended and Restated 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the
 “Incentive Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, the
Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the Compensation Committee of the Board has determined that it is in the best
interests of the Company to amend the Incentive Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock
authorized to be issued under the Incentive Plan by 4,500,000, from 7,873,000 to 12,373,000; and


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 13 of the Incentive Plan, an amendment that materially increases the aggregate number of shares that may be issued under
the Incentive Plan generally must be approved by a majority of votes cast by the stockholders of the Company in accordance with
applicable stock exchange rules.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
effective as of the date of approval by a majority of votes cast by the stockholders of the Company in accordance with applicable
stock exchange rules, the Incentive Plan is hereby amended in the following particulars:


 


	 	1.	Section 4(a) of the Incentive Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
	 	 	 
	 	 	Share Reserve. Subject to the provisions of Section 11 relating to adjustments upon changes in Common Stock, the Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Awards shall not exceed in the aggregate of 12,373,000 shares of Common Stock. During the terms of the Awards, the Company shall keep available at all times the number of shares of Common Stock required to satisfy such Awards.
	 	 	 
	 	2.	In all other respects the Incentive Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
December 8, 2010
Ms. Tala Henry, Deputy Director National Program Chemicals Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building – Mail Code 7403M 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20460
RE: Request for Meeting regarding EPA HBCD Chemical Action Plan
Dear Ms. Henry: The EPS Molders Association (EPSMA) would like to re quest a meeting with you and other the EPA staff responsible for managing the HBCD (Hexabromocyclodod ecane) Chemical Action Plan and the 2011 Design for the Environment (DfE) assessment of HBCD.
EPSMA is a national trade association representing manufacturers of expanded polystyrene (EPS) building products. Since flame retardant additives are a nece ssary component of our members’ products, we are closely following the regulatory activity related to HB CD and are interested in sharing relevant information with your agency and gaining a better understanding of th e EPA CAP as it relates to future regulatory action. Throughout the past year we’ve been deeply engaged in the Environment Canada and Health Canada risk assessment and risk management process for HBCD, which we believe was mutually beneficial.
We would like to meet with you to introduce our industr y, outline the applications using EPS insulation, and review ongoing developments to identify alternative fl ame retardants. In addition, we would like to discuss the findings presented in the HBCD CAP in more deta il and if possible, gain a better understanding of the HBCD DfE process and timeline.
Contingent on your schedule, we would like to propose a meeting in early January, preferably in the DC area. I would attend along with key industry leaders that ar e knowledgeable on the HBCD topic. Would you be available on January 5, 6 or 7?
Please let us know if you would be available for a possible meeting on those dates or if there is some other time frame that might work better. I can be reached by phone at 1-800-607-3772 or email, ( emsteiner@epscentral.org ). We appreciate your considerat ion and look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,

EPS MOLDERS ASSOCIATION

Betsy Steiner Executive Director 1298 Cronson Blvd., Suite 201 Crofton, MD 21114 (800) 607-3772
www.e p smolders.or g
July 13 , 2015

Mr. Erik C. Johnson

Partner/Business Director

J2 Marketing, LLC

4609 Grape Road

Mishawaka, IN 46545

Dear Mr. Johnson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§§ 61.113(a) and (b), 91.103, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

(14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next

30 day s.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 19 , 2015, exemption request on behalf of J2 Marketing, LLC into the

public docket (No. FAA−2015−1706), but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does not compl y with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program An alyst

, Airmen and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
, 

### $53 

# I1

**OFFICE** OFTHR ATTORNEYGENERAL OFTRXAS AUSTIN

County attoraer Palo Pinto, Tuaa

Ill your lottexR4 roqttaet

w ta a6smb as tr poratb6 oity aa

be aad aooboiv11 i5tatutbu. bet**~9uC OppiaiQIl**  **111 t0**  Whbthbr **8X ’**  **A8t th0**  **v aurp**  bum 3.lm in 80 opamatlng its baaao gn pamonger amr **lfbanrer** 4.btlol@ting **Artlolb** 805 of the Fend, Ood& Said Irrrtlele 805 '~ rbada am..

iollaws:Honorable Sdgar A. Naddo~, pag4 a


### *whoever operate8 upaa e public highmy a motor vbhiOlb under a liaea8e,however obtalnod, for a class other than that to whlob eueh -hicle pronerlg belongs, shall be find not exaeedM two hundreddollars." Tho registrationof ~motorvehiol4s 14 prorlded for In iirtiole;~blBa, Vernon'qAnnotated Civil Statuto8, and Subeaotlons (j) and (n) of i3ectIon 1 th4reor

### read8s fOllu44~ "(J) 'Pa444ngerCar' m44nr 4nymotor r4hlale other thsn 8 motor oyole or a bus a8 **8bfiMd** in this hot, designed or us4d prhudy for th4 tranrportatlonof per40n4.w "(A) 

### Qotor Bus'ah411 Inolude

### mry rehicle exobpt those op4rat4d by maaoular pwer or excluslrelyon stationaryrails 

### or traake, whloh 14 used in transportingger4onr botnssn or thra h two or more Inaorporat4d 4ltie8 c&Ad/Or town8 and

7 OT villages for otnspsnration(orhire) whether op4roted over fired route8 or titherwire; except mob or said rehIole8a8 are operated ereluslrelyrlthin th4 llmlts at incorpomted bit148 and/or tumor or suburban addition8to 8uch tovme.w .ThevEhlQle8 In que4tloa do not 

### rau wlthla the abme derlnitlon or a Wotor bu8*, 8inbe the 68410 are not u4ad in tran*portingperaorr between

### tro or more towns or villagee. They do fall 8 

### ora *pa44enger oar* and 

### arethere ;~~G.I.ows that there is no * We note the dotlnltlon of a "motor burreompanf' In artlols Slla, Seotlon 1 (a),Vernon*8 Annotated Ciril **Statutes.** k eonoem carrying persons rot aoapsluationor hire bsaome4 a motor bu4 oompany, subjeot to regulation by the Railroad Combaion, when lta motor vehlclee operate **bctyond the**  limit8 and **out** sIde.tha suburb8 of an inoorporatedalty ar tam, whether they enter any othsr alty 

### or town, or suburb8 thereof, or not. However, the re@atratlon is44 of theme vehloles are 

### governbd byEonorable Blgar A. Yladdox, page 3

Artlole 667&, according to the plain and **unambiguous** term8 of whlah the vehicler in queetlonmust be olaeaed aa passenger car6. Tfoure wry truly

6RLiQb
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information excerpted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended 12/31/95.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          15,729
<SECURITIES>                                    13,739
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,645
<PP&E>                                          81,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,536
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,015)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,872
<SALES>                                              6
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,229
<CGS>                                                1
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (788)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,431)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,431)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5074

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for State accreditation of diabetes self-management training programs under the Medicare

Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. NETHERCUTT (for himself and Ms. DEGETTE) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition

to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for State accreditation of diabetes self-management

training programs under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. STATE ACCREDITATION OF DIABETES SELF4 MANAGEMENT TRAINING PROGRAMS.

5 Section 1861(qq)(2) of the Social Security Act (42

6 U.S.C. 1395xx(qq)(2)) is amended—
2

•HR 5074 IH

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)

2 by striking ‘‘paragraph (1)—’’ and inserting ‘‘para3 graph (1):’’;

4 (2) in subparagraph (A)—

5 (A) by striking ‘‘a ‘certified provider’ ’’ and

6 inserting ‘‘A ‘certified provider’ ’’; and

7 (B) by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a pe8 riod; and

9 (3) in subparagraph (B)—

10 (A) by striking ‘‘a physician, or such other

11 individual’’ and inserting ‘‘(i) A physician, or

12 such other individual’’;

13 (B) by inserting ‘‘(I)’’ before ‘‘meets appli14 cable standards’’;

15 (C) by inserting ‘‘(II)’’ before ‘‘is recog16 nized’’;

17 (D) by inserting ‘‘, or by a program de18 scribed in clause (ii),’’ after ‘‘recognized by an

19 organization that represents individuals (includ20 ing individuals under this title) with diabetes’’;

21 and

22 (E) by adding at the end the following:

23 ‘‘(ii) Notwithstanding any reference to ‘a na24 tional accreditation body’ in section 1865(b), for

25 purposes of clause (i), a program described in this
3

•HR 5074 IH

1 clause is a program operated by a State for the pur2 poses of accrediting diabetes self-management train3 ing programs, if the Secretary determines that such

4 State program has established quality standards

5 that meet or exceed the standards established by the

6 Secretary under clause (i) or the standards origi7 nally established by the National Diabetes Advisory

8 Board and subsequently revised as described in

9 clause (i).’’.

Æ
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/18/2004 Page 1 of 2
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/18/2004 Page 2 of 2
§ 154.2113 Alkylene oxides—Special requirements. A vapor control system (VCS) that controls vapors of an alkylene oxide, except for carriage under 46 CFR part 151 (listed in Table 151.05 with “Pressure” entry in the “Cargo identification, Pressure, b” column), must comply with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) ( 1 ) The VCS's equipment, hoses, piping, and all piping components, including valves, flanges, and fittings, must be of a type and constructed out of materials suitable for use with alkylene oxide;
( 2 ) The VCS used for collecting an alkylene oxide vapor must not be used for collecting other vapors and must be separated from any other VCS, except as specified by paragraph (b) of this section; and
( b ) The VCS must be adequately cleaned in accordance with 33 CFR 154.2150(p) and either recertified by a certifying entity or approved by a marine chemist if— ( 1 ) The VCS is used to control other vapors; or
( 2 ) The VCS is returned to alkylene oxide service after being used to control other cargo vapors.
BRIAN LAMANS HUGHES

,

Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 2614

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed September 1, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington , Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis , Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Robert Lee , Assistant Attorney General,

Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, J J

., CONCUR.
#### § 334.1125 Pacific Ocean Naval Air Weapons Station, Point Mugu, Small Arms Range, Ventura County, California; danger zone.

(a) *The area.* A triangular area extending southerly into the waters of the Pacific Ocean from a point on the beach north of Point Mugu, California, as follows:

| Station | Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 34°05′48′′ N | 119°07′03′′ W. |
| 2 | 34°03′20′′ N | 119°08′16′′ W. |
| 3 | 34°03′11′′ N | 119°07′39′′ W. |
| 4 | 34°05′42′′ N | 119°06′59′′ W. |
| 5 | 34°05′41′′ N | 119°06′51′′ W. |
| 6 | 34°05′45′′ N | 119°06′52′′ W. |

(b) *The regulations.*

(1) Range firing will normally take place between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.

(2) The danger zone may be used at all times for navigation and fishing, except when advance notice of intention to use this area has been given by the enforcing agency by one or more of the following means:

(i) Notice published in Ventura County daily newspaper, at least two days in advance of the date of said use and in the local “Notice to Mariners.”

(ii) Display of red flag from the tower at 34°05′53′′ N., 119°06′59′′ W; or display of red flashing beacons in the case of night firing.

(iii) Radio broadcast on VHF-FM channel 16.

(iv) Notice to individual craft by visit of United States vessel.

(v) Telephone advice to such fisherman's organizations as may request, in writing, that such advice be given.

(3) Safety observers will be on duty at all times when the range is in use. Upon completion of firings, or if the scheduled firing is canceled for any reason, fishermen and small boat operators will be notified as far in advance as possible by Marine Radio Broadcast.

(4) Persons, vessels or other craft shall not enter or remain in the danger zone when the warning flag or beacon is being displayed unless authorized to do so by the range officer in the control tower.

(5) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by personnel attached to the Naval Air Weapons Station, Point Mugu, California, and by such other agencies as the Commandant, Eleventh Naval District, San Diego, California, may designate.

[62 FR 40278, July 28, 1997]