alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

               SUNBEAM CORPORATION SELECTS NEW ADVERTISING AGENCY

         FORT LAUDERDALE, FL - October 8, 1996 - Sunbeam Corporation (NYSE:SOC)
announced today that it has selected Ogilvy & Mather to assist its new marketing
team in the development and execution of a global marketing strategy to
re-energize the Sunbeam brand. Ogilvy, renowned for its unique "Brand
Stewardship" approach, will help Sunbeam reposition and build its brand, both
nationally and internationally, using advertising and other integrated marketing
components. Ogilvy has a proven track record for success with such current
clients as IBM, Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Kimberly-Clark.

         Albert J. Dunlap, Sunbeam's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
stated, "Sunbeam has been severely under-investing in the advertising support of
its products and its brand. We will immediately create a cohesive global
marketing program designed to revitalize Sunbeam and make it more relevant to
today's consumer." Mr. Dunlap added, "This marketing program will enhance global
consumer awareness and trial through focusing on current innovations and new
product introductions. As such it will be one of the fundamental drivers in the
growth of Sunbeam."

         The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ogilvy's Chicago office,
Tom Hall, commented, "The Sunbeam brand has an awesome amount of equity. The
opportunity to reunite Sunbeam with its core customers is very exciting to us
from a branding perspective." He continued, "Al Dunlap has proven in the past
that he knows the power of brands and he understands their value. We couldn't be
more delighted to work with him and with Sunbeam."

         Sunbeam Corporation is a leading consumer products company that
designs, manufactures and markets, nationally and internationally, a diverse
portfolio of outdoor and household brand name products. The Company's 
Sunbeam(R) and Oster(R) brands have been household names for generations, both
domestically and abroad, and the Company is a market leader in many of its 
product categories.

                                ****************



Contact: Media (Sunbeam):     Investor Relations:      Ogilvy & Mather Chicago

         Pete Judice          John DeSimone            Marilyn Dickert
         (212)614-4506        (954)767-2100            (312)856-8366
#### § 3050.13 Additional documentation required in the Postal Service's section 3652 report.

At the time the Postal Service files its section 3652 report, it shall include a brief narrative explanation of any changes to accepted analytical principles that have been made since the most recent Annual Compliance Determination was issued and the reasons that those changes were accepted.
Case 1:22-cv-22381-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022   Page 1 of 8

Case 1:22-cv-22381-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022   Page 2 of 8

Case 1:22-cv-22381-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022   Page 3 of 8

Case 1:22-cv-22381-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022   Page 4 of 8

Case 1:22-cv-22381-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022   Page 5 of 8

Case 1:22-cv-22381-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022   Page 6 of 8

Case 1:22-cv-22381-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022   Page 7 of 8

Case 1:22-cv-22381-RLR   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022   Page 8 of 8
**1998-  cold_storage_12.18.98cold_storage_11.20.98cold_storage_10.20.98cold_storage_09.18.98cold_storage_08.21.98cold_storage_07.20.98cold_storage_06.19.98cold_storage_05.20.98cold_storage_04.20.98cold_storage_03.20.98cold_storage_02.20.98cold_storage_01.21.98

**
§ 3022.12 Pleadings filed in response to a complaint. ( a ) Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, the Postal Service shall file its answer to a complaint within 20 days after the complaint is filed.
( b ) If appropriate, the Postal Service may file a dispositive motion or otherwise move to delay disposition of the complaint. If the Postal Service files such a motion, unless otherwise ordered by the Commission, the period of time for filing its answer is altered as follows: ( 1 ) If the Commission denies the motion or postpones disposition, the answer is due within 10 days of the Commission's action; or
( 2 ) If the Commission invokes the rate or service inquiry special procedures under § 3022.13 to the complaint, the answer is due contemporaneously with the Postal Service's report under § 3023.11 of this chapter if the complaint has not been resolved by that date.
( c ) If the Postal Service answer is delayed by the filing of a motion under paragraph (b) of this section, it may not obtain a further delay by filing another motion under paragraph (b) of this section raising an issue or objection that was available to the Postal Service but omitted from its earlier motion.
[74 FR 16744, Apr. 10, 2009, as amended at 85 FR 9656, Feb. 19, 2020]
§ 3030.126 Proceedings. ( a ) If the Commission determines that the rate adjustment filing does not substantially comply with the requirements of §§ 3030.122 and 3030.123, the Commission may: ( 1 ) Inform the Postal Service of the deficiencies and provide an opportunity for the Postal Service to take corrective action;
( 2 ) Toll or otherwise modify the procedural schedule until such time the Postal Service takes corrective action;
( 3 ) Dismiss the rate adjustment filing without prejudice; or
( 4 ) Take other action as deemed appropriate by the Commission.
( b ) Within 21 days of the conclusion of the public comment period the Commission will determine whether the planned rate adjustments are consistent with applicable law and issue an order announcing its findings. Applicable law means only the applicable requirements of this part, Commission directives and orders, and 39 U.S.C. 3626, 3627, and 3629.
( c ) If the planned rate adjustments are found consistent with applicable law, they may take effect.
( d ) If the planned rate adjustments are found inconsistent with applicable law, the Commission will notify and require the Postal Service to respond to any issues of noncompliance.
( e ) Following the Commission's notice of noncompliance, the Postal Service may submit an amended rate adjustment filing that describes the modifications to its planned rate adjustments that will bring its rate adjustments into compliance. An amended rate adjustment filing shall be accompanied by sufficient explanatory information to show that all deficiencies identified by the Commission have been corrected.
( f ) The Commission will allow a period of 10 days from the date of the amended rate adjustment filing for public comment.
( g ) The Commission will review the amended rate adjustment filing together with any comments filed for compliance and issue an order announcing its findings within 21 days after the comment period ends.
( h ) If the planned rate adjustments as amended are found to be consistent with applicable law, they may take effect. However, no amended rate shall take effect until 45 days after the Postal Service transmits its rate adjustment filing specifying that rate.
( i ) If the planned rate adjustments in an amended rate adjustment filing are found to be inconsistent with applicable law, the Commission shall explain the basis for its determination and suggest an appropriate remedy. Noncompliant rates may not go into effect.
( j ) A Commission finding that a planned rate adjustment is in compliance with the applicable requirements of this part, Commission directives and orders, and 39 U.S.C. 3626, 3627, and 3629 is decided on the merits. A Commission finding that a planned rate adjustment does not contravene other policies of 39 U.S.C. chapter 36, subchapter I, is provisional and subject to subsequent review.
Exhibit 32(c)

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia
Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, we, the undersigned, hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of our knowledge and belief, that:

     (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the
          quarter ended June 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
          Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of Georgia Power Company.

                                             /s/David M. Ratcliffe
                                              David M. Ratcliffe
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer

                                               /s/C. B. Harreld
                                                 C. B. Harreld
                                           Executive Vice President,
                                     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  August 13, 2003
#### *Stealy v. Jackson.

March, 1823.

Chancery Practice — Appeals—Security after Expiratl0n 2* Term.* — (The Chancellor may grant an appeal from his own decree during the term, with an allowance of time to the appellant to give security after the expiration of the term.)

This was an appeal from the Staunton chancery court, where the case was decided in favor of the defendant, the present appellee. The plaintiff prayed an appeai; which was allowed, with permission to the appellant to give bond and security within thirty days.

When the case came on to be argued in this court, Tucker for the appellee, made a preliminary objection, that the appeal was irregularly granted, because the law did not authorise the chancellor to allow the bond and security to be given after the term, where the appeal was taken during the term, (a)

*

See monographic *note*on “Appeal ana Error” appended to Hill v. Salem, etc., Turnpike Co., 1 Rob. 263.

(a)

 1 Rev. Code (of 1819,) p. 206, sec. 50, 51.

JUDGE BROOKE,

March 31. — delivered the opinion of the court.

On the preliminary question, whether the appeal in this case has been regularly granted, the court is of opinion, that though the act of assembly might be susceptible of a different construction, if it were res integra, that which has been adopted by the chancellor, has been so long acquiesced in by this court, that it is now too late to-disturb it. The cause has therefore been considered on its merits, and the court is of opinion to affirm the decree.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5341 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5341

To preserve the requirement for the annual bank fee report by the Board 
  of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2000

 Mr. LaFalce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To preserve the requirement for the annual bank fee report by the Board 
  of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Annual Banking Fee Survey Extension 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF BANK FEE REPORT REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3003(a)(1) of the Federal Reports 
Elimination and Sunset Act of 1995 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note) shall not 
apply to any report required to be submitted under section 1002(b) of 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989.
    (b) Repeal of Sunset of Report.--Section 108 of the Riegle-Neal 
Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 1811 
note) is amended by striking subsection (b).
    (c) Credit Unions Included in Survey.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1002(a)(1) of the Financial 
        Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 
        U.S.C. 1811 note) is amended by inserting ``, including credit 
        unions'' after ``insured depository institutions''.
            (2) Technical and conforming amendment.--Section 
        1002(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Financial Institutions Reform, 
        Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 1811 note) is 
        amended by inserting ``, or by the National Credit Union 
        Administration Board in the case of an insured credit union'' 
        before the period at the end.
    (d) Credit Card Fees.--Section 1002(a)(2) of the Financial 
Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 
1811 note) is amended by inserting ``credit cards,'' after ``deposit 
items returned,''.
                                 <all>
```
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-23483-PCH

 

RAFAEL HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HP INC., 

 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________/ 

ORDER

THIS MATTER came before the Court through Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF 

No. 12], filed January 12, 2023. Plaintiff filed its Response in Opposition [ECF No. 13] on 

January 26, 2023, and Plaintiff filed his Reply [ECF No. 14] on February 2, 2023. A hearing 

was held on the motions on February 15, 2023. 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that for the reasons set forth at the hearing, 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is granted with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file an amended 

complaint by March 17, 2023. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, on February 15, 2023. 

 ___________________________ 

 Paul C. Huck

Senior United States District Judge

cc: Counsel of Record

 

Case 1:22-cv-23482-PCH Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
### Hydrogeologic framework of the Great Basin region of Nevada, Utah, and adjacent states

By: R. W. Plume

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1409B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32.2

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | RELM Wireless Corporation                           
| | /s/ WILLIAMP. KELLY                                 
| | William P. Kelly                                    
| | Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer



August 4, 2006
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Supplementary Wage Practices in American Industry, 1945-46

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Supplementary Wage Practices in American Industry, 1945-46 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 939*,												Washington, D.C: 								For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 										1948,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4369,			accessed on September 15, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge 

Vincent Mark Santana 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned,Joseph J. Talley Chief Financial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company,(the “Company”), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended February 28, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of April,2006.

 
| By:    | /s/ Joseph J. Talley           |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Joseph J. Talley         |   |
|   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
|        |                                |        |  |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 183.564 Fuel tank fill system. ( a ) Each fuel fill opening must be located so that a gasoline overflow of up to five gallons per minute for at least five seconds will not enter the boat when the boat is in its static floating position.
( b ) Each hose in the tank fill system must be secured to a pipe, spud, or hose fitting by: ( 1 ) A swaged sleeve;
( 2 ) A sleeve and threaded insert; or
( 3 ) Two adjacent metallic hose clamps that do not depend solely on the spring tension of the clamps for compressive force.
( c ) Each hose clamp in the tank fill system must be used with a hose designed for clamps.
( d ) Hose clamps used in the tank fill system must: ( 1 ) Have a minimum nominal band width of at least one-half inch; and
( 2 ) Be over the hose and the spud, pipe, or hose fitting.
[CGD 74-209, 42 FR 5950, Jan. 31, 1977, as amended by CGD 81-092, 48 FR 55737, Dec. 15, 1983]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        9
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                           10,321,225
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>              257,794
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                  4,877,025
<TRADING-ASSETS>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>     306,669,719
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>            306,669,719
<LOANS>                         332,826,797
<ALLOWANCE>                       3,068,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  677,970,234
<DEPOSITS>                      433,281,177
<SHORT-TERM>                    193,281,312
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>               6,643,332
<LONG-TERM>                      12,654,010
<COMMON>                          7,824,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                       24,286,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>  677,970,234
<INTEREST-LOAN>                  13,350,683
<INTEREST-INVEST>                 8,937,560
<INTEREST-OTHER>                    238,492
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                 22,526,735
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                8,781,731
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                4,787,877
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>             8,957,127
<LOAN-LOSSES>                       150,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                  342,967
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                   7,442,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   3,322,231
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>        2,632,235
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      2,632,235
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                         0295
<LOANS-NON>                       1,151,000
<LOANS-PAST>                      1,106,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                    311,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                          0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                             0
<RECOVERIES>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                      0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                       0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                   0


</TABLE>