alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hillsborough

No. 7310

#### Katherine Navonis v. Vincent W. Navonis

August 31, 1976

*506
      *George J. Basbanes,*by brief and orally, for the plaintiff.

Kenison, C.J.

In 1972 the plaintiff and the defendant were divorced by the decree of a Massachusetts court which made no order for support of the plaintiff or the parties’ minor child. In this action the plaintiff seeks a support order which will be satisfied from certain real property in New Hampshire which the parties jointly own. Since 1971 the plaintiff has paid the taxes on and has maintained the property. The plaintiff has resided in Massachusetts throughout the relevant period. The defendant’s last known address is in Massachusetts, and his present whereabouts are unknown. The Superior Court *(Bois,*J.) denied the plaintiff’s petition “for want of jurisdiction” and reserved and transferred the plaintiff’s exceptions.

RSA 458:19-a provides: “The superior court shall have a jurisdiction to make such orders or temporary orders of alimony to a divorced wife or of support to the children of divorced parents as justice shall require in cases where the decree of divorce was not granted in this jurisdiction, even though said divorce decree makes provision for alimony and support, provided the wife and the children are domiciled in this jurisdiction and the husband is served with process in this jurisdiction.”

The United States Constitution permits a State to award support when property of the defendant can be reached in the State even though the defendant cannot be served there. *Pennington v. Fourth Nat’l Bank,*243. U.S. 269 (1917); Annot., *Jurisdiction on Constructive or Substituted Service, in Divorce or Alimony Action, to Reach Property Within State,*10 A.L.R.3d 212 (1966); H. Clark, Jr., Domestic Relations 314 (1968). However, RSA 458:19-a prescribes a narrower jurisdiction. The. superior court does not have jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s claim under this statute, because neither the plaintiff nor the child is a New Hampshire domiciliary.

Nothing in this opinion precludes the plaintiff from bringing a bill in equity for partition of the property. *Hale v. Jaques,*69 N.H. 411, 43 A. 121 (1898). *See also*RSA ch. 538 and 491:7 (Supp. *5071975). The plaintiff may seek in that proceeding a comprehensive adjudication of the parties’ rights in the property. *Owen v. Stewart,*111 N.H. 350, 283 A.2d 492 (1971).

*Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS113617 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Case 9:22-cv-81589-RAR   Document 32   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023   Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 27, 2009 of the
Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Deborah H. MerrillDeborah H. MerrillVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
### ATTACHMENT B

Best Available Retrofit Technology Determination

submitted by O

- N Minerals (Chemstone ) Company,

February 2007
Exhibit 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alberto-Culver Company (the company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard B. Bernick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Howard B. Bernick                
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|February 8, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of New Albertson's, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended May 4, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Lawrence R.
Johnston and Felicia D. Thornton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to our knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
          Report.

May 31, 2006


/s/ Lawrence R. Johnston
-------------------------------------
Lawrence R. Johnston
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Felicia D. Thornton
-------------------------------------
Felicia D. Thornton
Chief Financial Officer
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

 CASE NO.: 9:22-CV-81071-DMM 

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

300 N CONGRESS LLC

a Florida Limited Liability Company

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

The Plaintiff, HOWARD COHAN and the Defendant, 300 N CONGRESS LLC, a Florida 

Limited Liability Company (the Parties) by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby notifies 

the Court that the instant action has settled. Accordingly, the Parties expect to file a stipulation of 

dismissal within ten (10) days and should not be required to file any further responses, motions, 

and/or pleadings.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED September 7, 2022.

By: /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 0105553

Samantha L. Simpson, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 1010423

Sconzo Law Office, P.A.

3825 PGA Boulevard, Suite 207

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Telephone: (561) 729-0940

Facsimile: (561) 491-9459

Email: greg@sconzolawoffice.com 

Email: samantha@sconzolawoffice.com

Email: alexa@sconzolawoffice.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

By: /s/ Carri S. Leininger 

Carri S. Leininger, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 0861022

Jessica L. Gregory, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 92019

Williams, Leininger & Cosby, P.A. 

11300 US Highway One, Suite 300

North Palm Beach, FL 33408

Telephone: (561) 615-5666

Facsimile: (561) 615-9606

Service to: eservice@wlclaw.com

Case 9:22-cv-81071-DMM Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 7, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on counsel of record in this action via transmission of Notices of Electronic 

Filing generated by CM/ECF.

_ /s/ Gregory S. Sconzo

Gregory S. Sconzo, Esq.

Case 9:22-cv-81071-DMM Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/07/2022 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc.(the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|        |   | /s/ Teresa A. O’Quinn     |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Teresa A. O’Quinn   |
|   |   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date:  March 28,2007

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PeoplesCommunity Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWind-tunnel evaluation of a 21-percent-scale powered model of a prototype advanced scout helicopterAn exploratory wind tunnel investigation of a 21 percent scale powered model of a prototype advanced scout helicopter was conducted in the Langley 4 by 7 Meter Tunnel. The investigation was conducted to define the overall aerodynamic characteristics of the Army Helicopter Improvement Program (AHIP), to determine the effects of the rotor on the aerodynamic characteristics and to evaluate the effect of a mast mounted sight on the aircraft stability characteristics. Tests covered a range of thrust coefficients, advance ratios, angles of attack and angles of sideslip and were run for both rotor on and rotor off configurations. Results of the investigation showed that the prototype configuration was longitudinally unstable with angle of attack for all configurations tested. The instability was due to unfavorable interference effects between the horizontal tail and the wake shed from the engine pylon and rotor hub, which caused a loss of horizontal tail effectiveness. The addition of the mast mounted sight had little effect on the stability of the model, but it caused an alteration in the rotor lift distribution that resulted in substantial interference drag for the sight.Document ID19850020611Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsPhelps, A. E., III*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Berry, J. D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1985Publication InformationPublisher: NASA, WashingtonSubject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2420NAS 1.60:2420AVSCOM-TR-85-B-2AD-A157115L-15895Accession Number85N28923Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-45-43-02PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62209-AH76Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850020611.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 334.744 Eglin Poquito Housing at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla.; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The restricted area shall encompass all navigable waters of the United States, as defined at 33 CFR part 329, within the area bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates: Commencing from the shoreline at latitude 30°27′11.68′′ N, longitude 086°34′32.87′′ W; thence to latitude 30°27′11.86′′ N, longitude 086°34′34.59′′ W; then the line meanders irregularly, following the shoreline at a distance of 150 feet seaward from the mean high water line to a point at latitude 30°27′31.25′′ N, longitude 086°34′38.56′′ W, thence proceeding directly to a point on the shoreline at latitude 30°27′34.07′′ N, longitude 086°34′35.67′′ W.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) All persons, vessels and other craft are permitted access to the restricted area described in paragraph (a) of this section. Any person or vessel within the restricted area will be subject to identification checks by U.S. Air Force patrol boats. During times of high security threats against Eglin AFB, all entry, transit, anchoring or drifting within the restricted area described in paragraph (a) of this section for any reason is not allowed without the permission of the Commander, Eglin AFB, Florida, or his/her authorized representative.
( 2 ) The area identified in paragraph (a) of this section and the associated restrictions described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section are in effect 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
( c ) *Enforcement.* ( 1 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, 96 Air Base Wing, Eglin AFB, Florida and such agencies as he/she may designate.
( 2 ) Enforcement of the regulations in this section will be accomplished in accordance with the active security level as defined by the Department of Defense Force Protection Condition (FPCON) System.
[76 FR 75457, Dec. 2, 2011]
#### § 965.10 Transcript.

Testimony and argument at hearings shall be reported verbatim, unless the presiding officer otherwise orders. Transcripts or copies of the proceedings are supplied to the parties at such rate as may be fixed by contract between the reporter and Postal Service.
#### § 966.1 Authority for rules.

These rules of practice are issued by the Judicial Officer pursuant to authority delegated by the Postmaster General.
§ 3030.245 Application of banked rate authority. ( a ) Banked rate authority may be applied to any planned rate adjustment subject to the limitations appearing in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section.
( b ) Banked rate authority may only be applied to a proposal to adjust rates after applying rate authority as described in subparts C through F of this part and in § 3030.222.
( c ) A maximum of 2 percentage points of banked rate authority may be applied to a rate adjustment for any class in any 12-month period. If banked rate authority is used, it shall be subtracted from the schedule of banked rate adjustment authority as of the date of the final order accepting the rates.
( d ) Subject to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, interim rate adjustment authority may be used to make a rate adjustment pursuant to the rate adjustment filing that led to its calculation. If interim rate adjustment authority is used to make such a rate adjustment, the interim rate adjustment authority generated pursuant to the rate adjustment filing shall first be added to the schedule of banked rate adjustment authority pursuant to § 3030.241 as the most recent entry. Then, any interim rate adjustment authority used in accordance with this paragraph (d) shall be subtracted from the existing banked rate adjustment authority using a first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, beginning 5 years before the instant rate adjustment filing.
( e ) Banked rate authority for a class must be applied, using a first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, beginning 5 years before the instant rate adjustment filing.
( f ) Banked rate adjustment authority calculated under this section shall lapse 5 years from the date of the rate adjustment filing leading to its calculation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          51,494
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  411,909<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     73,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                       2,473,899
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,136,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,161,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,138,763
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     640,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,161,896
<SALES>                                         57,640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               439,410
<CGS>                                           31,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  321,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   959
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,307
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.70
<FN>
<F1>THE VALUE FOR RECEIVABLES REPRESENTS THEIR AMOUNT NET OF THEIR ALLOWANCES.
<F2>AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET EXISTS IN THE REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
SJGS BART Analysis - Cost estimate update
	Norem, Nancy 
	to:
	Joe Kordzi
	10/22/2010 03:12 PM
	Cc:
	"Gannon, Maureen", FischerDM, LucasKJ, mack.mcguffey
	Show Details



History:	This message has been forwarded.




Joe,
 
Attached [AI E-2 E-4 R3.pdf] is an update of the 2007 BART cost estimate for the installation 
of SCR's at SJGS.  This document also addresses the balanced draft issue.
 
Nancy Norem
§ 101-25.202 Factors to be used to determine assignment of purchase responsibility. With their consent or upon direction of the President, executive agencies will be designated and authorized by the Administrator of General Services exclusively, or with specified limited exceptions, to make purchases and contracts on a continuing basis for items or item groups of articles and services for the executive branch of the Government, after due consideration of the following factors, weighted as appropriate: ( a ) Current or potential predominant use or consumption by a given agency.
( b ) Availability of funds to carry out the assignment on a Government-wide basis or with limited exceptions.
( c ) Specialized personnel, or the nucleus of such personnel, regularly employed by the agency, such as scientific, research, and operating technicians, especially qualified or experienced in specification writing, buying, inspecting, testing, using, installing, or operating a particular item or group of items.
( d ) Custodianship and operation of special facilities such as research and testing laboratories and inspection or testing stations and devices.
( e ) Actual or potential qualifications and experience of agency purchasing and contracting officials and their operating units with due regard to adequacy of staff.
( f ) Past experience of the agency in performing services to other agencies on an informal or joint cooperative basis.
( g ) Relations of the agency with the industry involved.
( h ) Physical proximity of the agency purchasing office or offices to the requirement-compiling elements of the principal using agencies.
( i ) Physical location of the agency purchasing office or offices in relation to market areas.
( j ) Physical proximity of the agency purchasing offices in relation to engineering or design offices, in the interest of speed in processing modifications in design and specifications, and also reviewing bids for specifications compliance.
( k ) Relative interest of agency heads in receiving the purchase assignment and specific requests of agency heads to do the buying of a given item or group of items on a Government-wide basis.
§ 961.8 Hearing Official authority and responsibilities. The Hearing Official's authority includes, but is not limited to, the following: ( a ) Ruling on all motions or requests by the parties.
( b ) Issuing notices, orders or memoranda to the parties concerning the hearing proceedings.
( c ) Conducting telephone conferences with the parties to expedite the proceedings. The Hearing Official will prepare a Memorandum of Telephone Conference, which shall be transmitted to both parties and which serves as the official record of that conference.
( d ) After considering the positions of the parties, determining whether an oral hearing (or alternatively, a hearing solely on written submissions) shall be conducted, and setting the place, date, and time for such a hearing.
( e ) Administering oaths or affirmations to witnesses.
( f ) Conducting the hearing in a manner to maintain discipline and decorum while assuring that relevant, reliable and probative evidence is elicited on the issues in dispute, but irrelevant, immaterial or repetitious evidence is excluded. The Hearing Official in his or her discretion may examine witnesses to ensure that a satisfactory record is developed.
( g ) Establishing the record in the case. The weight to be attached to any evidence of record will rest within the discretion of the Hearing Official. Except as the Hearing Official may otherwise order, no proof shall be received in evidence after completion of an oral hearing or, in cases submitted on the written record, after notification by the Hearing Official that the record is closed. The Hearing Official may require either party, with appropriate notice to the other party, to submit additional evidence on any relevant matter.
( h ) Granting reasonable time extensions or other relief for good cause shown in the Hearing Official's sole discretion.
( i ) Issuing the final decision. The decision must include the determination of the amount and validity of the alleged debt and, where applicable, the repayment schedule. The Hearing Official will issue the decision as soon as practicable after the close of the record. Collection activity remains stayed until the decision has issued.