alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENT OF WORLDS INC. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000001961
<NAME>                        WORLDS INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,537,617
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    87,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,687,099
<PP&E>                                         1,050,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 488,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,752,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,507,468
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       18,816
<OTHER-SE>                                     373,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,752,886
<SALES>                                        92,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               92,925
<CGS>                                          70,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  70,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,425,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             68,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,453,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,453,881)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,453,881)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.08)



</TABLE>
§ 87.01 Need of assistance. The following signals, used or exhibited either together or separately, indicate distress and need of assistance: ( a ) A gun or other explosive signal fired at intervals of about a minute;
( b ) A continuous sounding with any fog-signaling apparatus;
( c ) Rockets or shells, throwing red stars fired one at a time at short intervals;
( d ) A signal made by any method consisting of the group . . . - - - . . . (SOS) in the Morse Code;
( e ) A signal sent by radiotelephony consisting of the spoken word “Mayday”;
( f ) The International Code Signal of distress indicated by N.C.;
( g ) A signal consisting of a square flag having above or below it a ball or anything resembling a ball;
( h ) Flames on the vessel (as from a burning tar barrel, oil barrel, etc.);
( i ) A rocket parachute flare or a hand flare showing a red light;
( j ) A smoke signal giving off orange-colored smoke;
( k ) Slowly and repeatedly raising and lowering arms outstretched to each side;
( l ) A distress alert by means of digital selective calling (DSC) transmitted on: ( i ) VHF channel 70, or
( ii ) MF/HF on the frequencies 2187.5 kHz, 8414.5 kHz, 4207.5 kHz, 6312 kHz, 12577 kHz or 16804.5 kHz;
( m ) A ship-to-shore distress alert transmitted by the ship's Inmarsat or other mobile satellite service provider ship earth station;
( n ) Signals transmitted by emergency position-indicating radio beacons;
( o ) Signals transmitted by radiocommunication systems, including survival craft radar transponders meeting the requirements of 47 CFR 80.1095; and
( p ) A high intensity white light flashing at regular intervals from 50 to 70 times per minute.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                SECURITISATION ADVISORY SERVICES PTY. LIMITED
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

     The undersigned officer of Securitisation Advisory Services Pty. Limited, a
company organized under the laws of New South Wales, Australia ("SAS"), hereby
certifies on behalf of SAS and on his own behalf for purposes of the Class A-1
Mortgage Backed Floating Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

      1.    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of SAS;

      2.    I  am  duly   authorized  to  execute  and  deliver  this  Officer's
            Certificate on behalf of SAS; and

      3.    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer Trustee has complied with
            all conditions and covenants under the transaction documents for the
            Series 2002-1G Medallion Trust issue of Notes for the period between
            February 14, 2002 and June 30, 2002.

      Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
assigned to such terms in the Prospectus Supplement related to the
above-referenced issue of Notes.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of October 15, 2002.


                                       By:  /s/  Geoffrey Michael Steel
                                          --------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Geoffrey Michael Steel
                                       Title: Director
Exhibit










Exhibit 10.2
TWENTY-SEVENTH AMENDMENT
OF
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN
(As amended and restated, Effective as of January 1, 2012)
WHEREAS, John Bean Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the John Bean Technologies Corporation Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, the Company now deems it necessary and desirable to amend the Plan to (i)  reflect the Company’s corporate restructuring under which certain Company employees shall transfer employment to the new wholly-owned entity JBT AeroTech Corporation and JBT AeroTech Corporation shall be come a participating employer in the Plan, and (ii) make certain other clarifying changes; and
WHEREAS, this Twenty-Seventh Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of the amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority reserved to the Company by Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective October 1, 2019: 
		
	1.
	Sections 2.12 and 2.13 of the Plan are hereby amended to replace the words “Years of Service” with the words “Hour of Service” where such words appear therein.


		
	2.
	A new Section 2.14 is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows:


		
	2.14
	Service Crediting for JBT AeroTech Corporation.  Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, effective October 1, 2019, if an individual  is actively employed by JBT AeroTech Corporation as of October 1, 2019, such individual’s period of employment with the Company shall be counted under the Plan for purposes of (i) eligibility to participate in the Plan and (ii) determining the individual’s Hours of Service under the Plan.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by a duly authorized representative this 1st day of October, 2019.
JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES 
CORPORATION




By:    /s/ Jason T. Clayton


Its:    EVP, Human Resources
AFS

- 16

- 6709

- E

June 30, 2016

Exemption No. 17019 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2016

- 3308

Mr. Philip Esdaile

Maxim Aviation

23490 Aviation Ave Davis, CA 95695

Dear Mr. Esdaile :

Thi s letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated December 17, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Maxim Aviation ( Maxim ) for an exemption from § 91.409(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Maxim to extend the hourly maintenance interval o n the Cessna model 208 aircraft from 100 to 150 hours and to

ope rate the aircraft outside the United States.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent

- setting petition , and any delay in acting on this petition woul d be detrimental to Maxim.

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petitio n. In the Denial of Exemption No. 10981 (copy enclosed) , the petitioner was denied extending the 100

- hour or annual inspections because u se of the task

- based program in lieu of the inspections required by § 91.409(a) and (b) would result in some items not being inspected at the currently required int ervals of annually or 100

hours

. T he FAA has determ ined that your petition does not differ materially from the facts presented by the petitioner in the enclose d D enial of Exemption No. 10981

. T he F AA finds
that Cessna’s task

- based inspection program is not compatible with the agency’s requirements

for ann ual and 100

- hour inspections currently applicable to Model CE208/208B airplanes.2

The reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Exemption No. 10981 also apply to the situation you present.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

 they do no t differ materially from those presented by the petition er in the enclosed Denial

of E xemption No. 10981 ;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No

. 10981 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption would no t be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of M A viation for an exemption

from 14 CFR § 91.409(b) to allow Maxim to extend the hourly maintenance interval on the Cessna model 208 aircraft from 100 to 150 hours and to operate the aircraft outside the United

States.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure Exemption 10981
§ 3022.41 Satisfaction. ( a ) If a complaint is resolved informally, in whole or in part, subsequent to Commission action under § 3022.30(a)(1), the complainant must promptly file: ( 1 ) A statement explaining the resolution; and
( 2 ) A motion to dismiss or amend the complaint based on the resolution.
( b ) The Commission may order the submission of additional information before acting on any motion filed under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( c ) In determining whether to allow the complaint to be dismissed or amended under this section, the Commission will take into consideration whether the issues raised by the complaint may continue to impact a significant segment of the mailing community.
[74 FR 16744, Apr. 10, 2009, as amended at 85 FR 9656, Feb. 19, 2020]
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Aceto Corporation, a New York
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Leonard S. Schwartz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
 (1)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/ Leonard S.
Schwartz
 Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
 February
6, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Fellowship Advisory Panel, Music Section (American Jazz Masters category) to the National Council on the Arts will be held on June 20, 2000. The panel will meet by teleconference from 12 p.m. to 2 p.m. in Room 703 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20506.

This meeting is for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 12, 2000, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.

Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C., 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

Dated: June 8, 2000.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 00-14935  Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHuman Health Effects of Ozone Depletion From Stratospheric AircraftThis report presents EPA's initial response to NASA's request to advise on potential environmental policy issues associated with the future development of supersonic flight technologies. Consistent with the scope of the study to which NASA and EPA agreed, EPA has evaluated only the environmental concerns related to the stratospheric ozone impacts of a hypothetical HSCT fleet, although recent research indicates that a fleet of HSCT is predicted to contribute to climate warming as well. This report also briefly describes the international and domestic institutional frameworks established to address stratospheric ozone depletion, as well as those established to control pollution from aircraft engine exhaust emissions.Document ID20020009749Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWey, ChowenDate AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 2001Subject CategoryLife Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/CR-2001-211160NAS 1.26:211160E-13018Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA Order C-30039-JPROJECT: RTOP 714-01-20CONTRACT_GRANT: EPA-80938647Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020009749.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MARVIN L. HAGGINS, a/k/a ) MARVIN LAVAN HAGGINS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2349 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 27, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, Judge. Marvin L. Haggins, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLow-speed stability and control characteristics of a transport model with aft-fuselage-mounted advanced turbopropsA limited experimental investigation was conducted in the Langley 4- by 7-Meter Tunnel to explore the effects of aft-fuselage-mounted advanced turboprop installations on the low-speed stability and control characteristics of a representative transport aircraft in a landing configuration. In general, the experimental results indicate that the longitudinal and lateral-directional stability characteristics for the aft-fuselage-mounted single-rotation tractor and counter-rotation pusher propeller configurations tested during this investigation are acceptable aerodynamically. For the single-rotation tractor configuration, the propeller-induced aerodynamics are significantly influenced by the interaction of the propeller slipstream with the pylon and nacelle. The stability characteristics for the counter-rotation pusher configuration are strongly influenced by propeller normal forces. The longitudinal and directional control effectiveness, engine-out characteristics, and ground effects are also presented. In addition, a tabulated presentation of all aerodynamic data presented in this report is included as an appendix.Document ID19860013109Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsApplin, Z. T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Coe, P. L., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1986Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2535NASA-TP-2535L-16004Accession Number86N22580Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 535-03-12-07Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860013109.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 3.5






CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT




OF
THE




CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION




OF




ACETO
CHEMICAL CO., INC.




Under
Section 805 of the


Business Corporation
Law




The
Undersigned, being the President and Secretary of ACETO CHEMICAL CO., INC., do
hereby certify and set forth:




(1)     The name of the Corporation is
ACETO CHEMICAL CO., INC. The name under which the Corporation was formed is
ACETO CHEMICAL CO. INC.




(2)     The
date the Certificate of Incorporation was filed by the Department of State is
the 13th day of June, 1947.




(3)     The
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, is amended pursuant
to Section 801 of the Business Corporation Law to change its corporate name from
ACETO CHEMICAL CO., INC., to ACETO CORPORATION and to increase the aggregate
number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, which the Corporation shall
have authority to issue, from 3,000,000 shares to 10,000,000
shares.




(4)     Paragraph
FIRST of the Certificate of Incorporation of ACETO CHEMICAL CO., INC., as
amended, which sets forth the name of the Corporation, is hereby amended to read
as follows:




“FIRST:
The name of the Corporation is ACETO CORPORATION.”


1


(5)     Paragraph
THIRD (A) of the Certificate of Incorporation of ACETO CHEMICAL CO., INC., as
amended, which sets forth the aggregate number of shares which the Corporation
shall have the authority to issue, is hereby amended to read as
follows:




“THIRD:     (A)     The
aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to issue
is 12,000,000 shares of which 2,000,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock,
issuable in series, of the par value of $2.50 per share and 10,000,000 shares
shall be Common Stock of the par value of $.01 per share.”




The
foregoing amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of ACETO CHEMICAL CO.,
INC. was authorized by vote of the Board of Directors followed by the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all outstanding shares entitled
to vote thereon at a meeting of the shareholders of said corporation duly called
and held on the 21st day of November, 1985, a quorum being present.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate has been subscribed this 21st day of November,
1985 by the undersigned, who affirm that the statements made herein are true
under the penalties of perjury.


/s/
      Seymour MannSeymour
      Mann, President/s/
      Arnold FrankelArnold
      Frankel, Secretary






2
§ 55.9 Child development centers. ( a ) The Commandant may make child development services available at child development centers located at Coast Guard installations.
( b ) Regular and unannounced inspections of each child development center shall be conducted annually by headquarters program personnel, the commanding officer of the sponsoring command, fire personnel, and health and safety personnel.
( c ) Training programs shall be conducted monthly to ensure that all child development center employees complete a minimum of 20 hours of training annually with respect to early childhood development, activities and disciplinary techniques appropriate to children of different ages, child abuse prevention and detection, and appropriate emergency medical procedures.
EX-10.5





 Exhibit 10.5 

FORM OF [_________] AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This ______ Amendment dated _______________ amends the terms of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of _______________, as
first amended effective ___________, [and as further amended effective _______,] (collectively, the “Agreement”) by and between The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) and _______________ (“Executive”). 

For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Company and Executive hereby agree as follows: 

The first sentence of Section 1.2 of the Agreement is deleted, and replaced by the following: 

Executive shall report to the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company. 

 

									
	THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.	 	        	 	EXECUTIVE


									
					
	By:	 	  
	 	          	 	By:	 	      

					
	Title:	 	  
	 		 	Name: