alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex-99.4  Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distribution to
         Certificatesholders.

                                                                 Ending
   Class      Interest          Principle         Losses        Balance
----------  ----------------  -----------------  ---------  ----------------
A1            8,328,547.00      70,018,906.21          -      70,301,107.36
A2            2,526,999.95                  -          -      36,100,000.00
A3              292,606.18      14,900,313.12          -                  -
A4            2,116,265.52                  -          -      30,232,365.00
A5            2,080,584.35                  -          -      29,722,634.00
A6               35,700.00                  -          -         510,000.00
A7              951,170.22                  -          -      13,588,146.00
B1              500,050.54          78,325.92          -       7,100,519.21
B2              177,103.82          27,740.83          -       2,514,803.92
B3               93,755.18          14,685.43          -       1,331,286.20
B4               83,341.76          13,054.33          -       1,183,419.86
B5               31,254.03           4,895.50          -         443,794.68
B6               52,093.65           8,159.73          -         739,709.36
PO                       -         719,438.27          -       3,912,979.28
R                        -                  -          -                  -
X               818,666.71                  -          -                  -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-81294-AMC

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Unseal Affidavit (the 

“Motion”). The Court has reviewed the Motion and is otherwise duly advised. Accordingly, it is 

hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. On or before ____________________, Defendant shall provide to Plaintiff and counsel 

for Plaintiff an unredacted copy of the August 5, 2022, search warrant affidavit.

3. The Parties shall treat the unredacted copy of the search warrant affidavit consistent 

with the provisions of the Judicial Protective Order entered on September 23, 2022 

[ECF No. 113].

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this ______ day of 

__________________, 2022. 

____________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 189-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/22/2022 Page 1 of 1
# AGENCY:

 Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

 Proposed rule. 

# SUMMARY:

 The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Gene Milner Broadcasting Company, Inc., proposing the reallotment of Channel 260B from Kankakee to Park Forest, Illinois, as the community's first local aural transmission service. Channel 260B can be reallotted to Park Forest in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements without the imposition of a site restriction at petitioner's licensed site. The coordinates for Channel 260B at Park Forest are 41-18-04 North Latitude and 87-49-35 West Longitude.

# DATES:

 Comments must be filed on or before February 7, 2000, and reply comments on or before February 22, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

 Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner, his counsel, or consultant, as follows: Dennis J. Kelly, Esq., Post Office Box 6648, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (Counsel for Petitioner). 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 This is a synopsis of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 99-330, adopted December 8, 1999, and released December 15, 1999. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036. 

Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding. 

                    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all                     *ex parte*                     contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible                     *ex parte*                    contacts.                 

For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. 

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

- Radio broadcasting

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-1470 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
§ 491.7 Release of information. ( a ) No employee whose duties include responding to interrogatories to garnishments shall release information in response to a garnishment until it is determined that sufficient information, as required in § 491.4, has been received in writing as part of the garnishment legal process. The Authorized Agent may, at his or her sole discretion, accept or initiate telephone or telefax inquiries concerning garnishments. No other employee may release any information about employees except in conformity with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and the regulations in 39 CFR Part 266, “Privacy of Information.”
( b ) The Authorized Agent's response to legal process is sufficient if it contains only that information not otherwise protected from release by any federal statute including the Privacy Act. Neither the Postal Service nor the Postal Rate Commission shall be required to provide formal answers to interrogatories received prior to the receipt of legal process. Employment verification may be obtained by accessing the Postal Service's employment verification system by dialing 1-(800) 276-9850.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MANUEL ALONSO ZARAGOZA,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 72676

Agency No. A073

- 938

- 744

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 14, 2023 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Manuel Alonso Zaragoza , a native and citizen of Mexico

, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen his reinstated deportation order

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We deny the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 17 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 72676

Because a prior dep ortation order that has been reinstated “is not subject to

being reopened or reviewed,” 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5), the BIA lacked jurisdiction to

consider Alonso Zaragoza’s motion to reopen

, s ee Gutierrez

- Zavala v. Garland

,

32 F.4th 806, 811 (9th Cir. 2022) ( “When the BIA denies a motion to reopen a

reinstated removal order on grounds other than a lack of jurisdiction, we may deny

a petition challenging that ruling based on the BIA’s lack of jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5).” ) ; Bravo

- Bravo v. Garland , 54 F.4th 634, 641 (9th Cir.

2022) ( “ [U] nder § 1231(a)(5), an alien ’ s prior removal order and proceedings are

not subject to being reopened, and the regulation providing the BIA ’ s sua sponte

reopening authority cannot override that command.” ( internal quotation marks and

cit ation omitted )); Reyes v. Garland , 11 F.4th 985, 990

- 91 (9th Cir. 2021) ( unlike

legislation, judicial decisions are “governed by a fundamental rule of retrospective

operation” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)).

Because this determination is dispositive of his claim, we do not address

Alonso Zaragoza’s remaining contentions. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d

532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts are not required to decide issues unnecessary to

the results they reach).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 327.11 Public notice. ( a ) Public notice shall be given of any public hearing to be held pursuant to this regulation. Such notice should normally provide for a period of not less than 30 days following the date of public notice during which time interested parties may prepare themselves for the hearing. Notice shall also be given to all Federal agencies affected by the proposed action, and to state and local agencies and other parties having an interest in the subject matter of the hearing. Notice shall be sent to all persons requesting a hearing and shall be posted in appropriate government buildings and provided to newspapers of general circulation for publication. Comments received as form letters or petitions may be acknowledged as a group to the person or organization responsible for the form letter or petition.
( b ) The notice shall contain time, place, and nature of hearing; the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is held; and location of and availability of the draft environmental impact statement or environmental assessment.
From: Freshairconsult@aol.com 

To: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/08/2009 03:00 PM 

Subject: Flare Drums 

Brenda: 

 

Thought it might be helpful to give you a drawing showing a typical flare drum design. It's attached. 

 

Norm 

(See attached file: Flare drum typical.pdf) 
API Standard 521 liSa 23251

Annex D

(informative)

Typical details and sketches

Figure 0.1 shows a typical horizontal flare seal drum.

Figure 0.2 shows a quench drum.

Figure 0.3 shows a typical flare installation.

Dimensions in centimetres (inches)

1

r

2

9

10 ---L----l

5

water supply

submerged weir welded on end of flare line

water level

baffle

6

7

8

g

10 drain

Key

1 to flare

2 flare header

3 Try cocks for checking for hydrocarbons

4 vent

5 to sewer

• The sewer seal should be designed for a minimum of 175 % of the drum's maximum operating pressure.

Figure 0.1 - Typical horizontal flare seal drum

166
V

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 511

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain customs entries

of nuclear fuel assemblies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1999

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain

customs entries of nuclear fuel assemblies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN NUCLEAR FUEL

4 ASSEMBLIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, upon proper request filed with the Secretary

8 of the Treasury not later than 90 days after the date of

9 the enactment of this Act, the Secretary—
2

•HR 511 IH

1 (1) shall reliquidate as free of duty the entries

2 listed in subsection (b); and

3 (2) shall refund any duties paid with respect to

4 each such entry, including duties paid on October 4,

5 1996, Customs Service Collection Receipt Number

6 527006753.

7 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in

8 subsection (a) are as follows:

Entry Number Date of Entry Date of Liquidation

062–2320014–5 .................................... 01–16–96 06–07–96

062–2320085–5 .................................... 02–13–96 07–12–96

839–4030989–7 .................................... 01–25–96 10–10–97

839–4031053–1 .................................... 12–02–96 10–17–97

839–4031591–0 .................................... 01–21–97 12–05–97

Æ
Order filed February 2 , 2023

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00490

- CV

____________ IN RE DOMINO'S PIZZA LLC , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 76781



### ORDER
On July 7, 2022, relator Domino’s Pizza LLC filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App.
P. 52. In the petition, relator asks t his court to compel the Honorable Jacalyn
McFarland to vacate her June 21, 2022 order denying relator’s motion for protection from certain specified deposition topics. On August 23, 2022, we abated this original proceeding for mediation. On December 2, 2022, relator’s counsel advised the court that the parties had settled the case at mediation, that it would take approximately 30 days to finalize the matter, and the parties would file the necessary papers to dismiss this original proceeding
and the trial court action.Thirty days have passed without either relator or real party in interest filing

the necessary paperwork with the court. We order relator and real part y in interest file a status upon on or before February 9 , 2023, advising the court of the status of
the case. Failure to do so will result in the denial of the petition for writ of
mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Jewell.
### M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO

. 2 of NUECES COUNTY, GREET INGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 22nd day of January, 2015 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

The State Of Texas, Appellant,

v.

Glenn Wrightman Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13

- 14

- 00652

- CR (Tr.Ct.No. 09CR5089

- 2)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 22, 2015.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our sai d Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 7th day of April, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5230 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5230

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to designate 
    Edmonson, Hart, and Metcalfe Counties, Kentucky, as part of the 
                          Appalachian region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 20, 2000

Mr. Lewis of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to designate 
    Edmonson, Hart, and Metcalfe Counties, Kentucky, as part of the 
                          Appalachian region.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 403 of the 
Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 (40 U.S.C. App.) is 
amended in the third undesignated paragraph relating to Kentucky--
            (1) by inserting ``Edmonson,'' before ``Elliott,'';
            (2) by inserting ``Hart,'' after ``Harlan,''; and
            (3) by inserting ``Metcalfe,'' after ``Menifee,''.
                                 <all>
```
Fw: Data Request

Michael Stewart to: crabtree.tricia 01/31/2010 11:37 AM

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

-----Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/31/2010 11:37AM -----

To: Edmund <crouch@CambridgeEnvironmental.com>

From: Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US

Date: 01/29/2010 04:26PM

cc: graham.stephen@epa.gov, martin.karen@epa.gov

Subject: Data Request

Dr Crouch:

This is a follow-up to the email I sent this morning. We believe that we have 

compiled the data that you requested. If you can provide an FTP site, we can 

start uploading the data files this afternoon. Please let me know if this is 

convenient for you. 

Thanks,

Michael

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

US. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov
```

[House Report 111-74]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     111-74
_______________________________________________________________________

                                     

                                                  House Calendar No. 41

                              R E P O R T

                                 of the

                       COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF

                            OFFICIAL CONDUCT

   April 2, 2009.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                         LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

                              ----------                              

                          House of Representatives,
                Committee on Standards of Official Conduct,
                                     Washington, DC, April 2, 2009.
Hon. Lorraine C. Miller,
Clerk, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Ms. Miller: In accordance with H. Res. 451, adopted on 
June 5, 2007, and extended in the 111th Congress by H. Res. 5, 
Section 4(e), the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct 
hereby submits the following attached report to the House of 
Representatives.
            Sincerely,
                                       Zoe Lofgren,
                                               Chairperson,
                        Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.

                                                  House Calendar No. 41
111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     111-74

======================================================================

 
        REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT

                                _______
                                

   April 2, 2009.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Ms. Lofgren, from the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

    On April 2, 2009, the Committee convened for the purpose of 
considering the citation issued to Representative Zack Space 
March 28, 2009 in Washington County, Ohio for the minor 
misdemeanor charge of operating a motor vehicle with an expired 
license. The Committee voted against empanelling an 
investigative subcommittee regarding this matter. The Committee 
found the conduct to be minor, and that Representative Space 
has publicly acknowledged the violation and paid the associated 
fine. As such, the Committee concluded the violation to be a de 
minimis (minor) matter for which review by an Investigative 
Subcommittee is not required.

                                  

```
§ 401.69 Hazardous cargo vessels. For the purpose of these Regulations, a vessel shall be deemed to be a hazardous cargo vessel in the following cases: ( a ) A tanker carrying fuel oil, gasoline, crude oil or other flammable liquids in bulk, having a flashpoint below 61 °C, including a tanker that is not gas free where its previous cargo had a flashpoint below 61 °C;
( b ) A tanker carrying compressed liquefied gases, bulk acids or liquefied chamicals; ( 1 ) In excess of 50 tonnes of gases, compressed, liquified or dissolved under pressure (IMO Class 2),
( 2 ) In excess of 50 tonnes of flammable liquids having a flashpoint below 61 °C (IMO Class 3),
( 3 ) In excess of 50 tonnes of flammable solids, spontaneously combustible material or substances emitting combustible gases when wet (IMO Class 4),
( 4 ) In excess of 50 tonnes of oxidizing substances or organic peroxides (IMO Class 5),
( 5 ) Any quantity of poisonous (toxic) substances and infectious substances (IMO Class 6),
( 6 ) Any quantity of radioactive substances (IMO Class 7),
( 7 ) In excess of 50 tonnes of corrosive substances (IMO Class 8),
( 8 ) Any quantity of metal turnings, borings, cuttings, or shavings in bulk having a temperature on loading or in transit in excess of 65.5 °C, and
( 9 ) Any quantity of grain that is under fumigation, where the chemical being used is hazardous to human life.
( 10 ) Any quantity of direct reduced iron (DRI).
[45 FR 52379, Aug. 7, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 51123, Nov. 12, 1982; 48 FR 20691, May 9, 1983]
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09565**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09565\09565_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09565\09565_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09565\09565_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09565\09565_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09565\09565_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09565\09565_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09565\09565_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09565\09565_Certification Statement Form.pdf Plant certification statement x 09565\Supporting Documentation\09565_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09565\09565_Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09565\09565_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09565\09565_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09565\09565_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.