alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 551.6 Pricing. ( a ) The Semipostal Authorization Act, as amended by Public Law 107-67, section 652, 115 Stat. 514 (2001), prescribes that the price of a semipostal stamp is the rate of postage that would otherwise regularly apply, plus a differential of not less than 15 percent. The price of a semipostal stamp shall be an amount that is evenly divisible by five. For purposes of this provision, the First-Class Mail® single-piece stamped first-ounce rate of postage will be considered the rate of postage that would otherwise regularly apply.
( b ) The prices of semipostal stamps are determined by the Governors of the United States Postal Service in accordance with the requirements of 39 U.S.C. 416.
[81 FR 23164, Apr. 20, 2016]
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Robert W. Humphreys, the Chief Executive Officer
of Delta Apparel, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his
knowledge:

      1.    The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3,
            2004 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with
            the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  September 1, 2004              /s/ Robert W. Humphreys
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Robert W. Humphreys
                                      President & Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been
provided to Delta Apparel, Inc. and will be retained by Delta Apparel, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 952.32 Official record.

The hearing transcript together with all pleadings, orders, exhibits, briefs and other documents filed in the proceeding shall constitute the official record of the proceeding.
#### § 273.1 Purpose.

This part establishes procedures for imposing civil penalties and assessments under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (codified at 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812) against any person who makes, submits, or presents, or causes to be made, submitted, or presented, a false fictitious, or fraudulent claim or written statement to the Postal Service. Procedures governing the hearing and appeal rights of any person alleged to be liable for such penalties and assessments are set forth in part 962 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Albertson's, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended August 4, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Lawrence R. Johnston
and Felicia D. Thornton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.

September 9, 2005

/S/ Lawrence R. Johnston

------------------------------
Lawrence R. Johnston
Chief Executive Officer

/S/ Felicia D. Thornton

-----------------------------
Felicia D. Thornton
Chief Financial Officer
#### Beavin *vs*Hardin.

*March 14.*

ApPKAT, .FROM TTIU M.CRÍON 'ClROUIT

Chancery.

*Case*62.

*Mortgagor and Mortgagee.*

A morlgagor who pays the mortgage debt is entitled to the moit gaged property. The mortgagee cannot incumber by bis mortgage 1o a third person so as to affect the rights of tile morlgagor, who lias no notice thereof

.lunon! ük.uiam

delivered the opinion of ibe Court.

Thu mortgage from Lewis T. Hardin, did not assign, and did not purport to transfer to Beavin, either the mortgage made by Mark Hardin to Lewis T. Hardin, or the debts secured by .that instrument. There is in fact not (lie slightest allusion to the latter, nor any intimation that Mark Hardin or his representatives have any interest in the slaves therein mentioned. Jt merely mortgages the two slaves which Mark had mortgaged to Lewis. We concur with the Circuit Court in the opinion, that the recording of the. mortgages to Beavin, was not notice either actual or constructive, to the representatives of Mark Hardin, of anything to affect their rights.

Hardin, and his executrix, after his death, were fully justified in satisfying the mortgage from Mark to Lewis, and in any payments made to, or arrangements made *332with'the latter, in its discharge. 'The proof is clear, that taking into consideration the-credits to which Mark Hardin’s estate is entitled, subsequent to the sale of Beavin’s mortgage, they, with the previous payments, much more than release the property from any claims which Lewis T., had upon it by reason of the mortgage. Beavin has no greater interest than Lewis T. Hardin had, and when the interest of the latter ceased, so did that of the former. The Court did not err in ••dismissing his bill, and the decree of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed. .

*Robertson S/ Fogle*for appellant; *Harlan and Shuck*for appellees.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIntegrated technology rotor/flight research rotor hub concept definitionTwo variations of the helicopter bearingless main rotor hub concept are proposed as bases for further development in the preliminary design phase of the Integrated Technology Rotor/Flight Research Rotor (ITR/FRR) program. This selection was the result of an evaluation of three bearingless hub concepts and two articulated hub concepts with elastomeric bearings. The characteristics of each concept were evaluated by means of simplified methodology. These characteristics included the assessment of stability, vulnerability, weight, drag, cost, stiffness, fatigue life, maintainability, and reliability.Document ID19850009742Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDixon, P. G. C.*(Boeing Vertol Co. Philadelphia, PA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1983Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberUSAAVRADCOM-TR-83-A-3NASA-CR-166447D210-11964-1NAS 1.26:166447Accession Number85N18051Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DAAK51-81-C-0027Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850009742.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By /s/ William S. Ayer
  --------------------------------
William S. Ayer
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALLEN
TELECOM'S March 31, 2000 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          27,638
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,525)
<INVENTORY>                                     84,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,147
<PP&E>                                         110,767
<DEPRECIATION>                                (63,653)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 444,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,019
<BONDS>                                        117,713
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,017
<OTHER-SE>                                     206,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   444,576
<SALES>                                         87,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,956
<CGS>                                         (62,574)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (62,574)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (22,447)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (103)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,961)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    974
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (391)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                570
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,870
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Earnings per Share amounts have been calculated in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per
Share".
</FN>


</TABLE>
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40161

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff-Respondent
,

v.

RICHARD JOHN CAVERLY
,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 524

Filed: June 5, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN U NPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Cassia County. Hon. Jonathan P. Brody , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period
of confinement of two years , for felony driving under the influence of
alcohol

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Richard John Caverly was convicted of felony driving under the influence of alcohol

, Idaho Code § 18

- 8004 . The district court sentenced Caverly to a unified term of ten years, with a

mi nimum period of confinement of two years

. Caverly appeals, contending that his sentence is

excessiv e.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idah o 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consid er the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Ca verly ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

SANDRA BRIDGES, a citizen and resident of

Tennessee

NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., a Bermuda corporation d/b/a NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES,

NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., d/b/a NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES,

c/o Registered Agent, DANIEL FARKAS, ESQ.

7665 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE

MIAMI, FL 33126

Paola M. Garcia, Esq.

Gerson & Schwartz, P.A.

1980 Coral Way

Miami, FL 33145

1:22-cv-23702-KMW

Nov 14, 2022 s/ R. Bissainthe

Case 1:22-cv-23702-KMW Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 3000.104-3000.109 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | RELM Wireless Corporation                           
| | /s/ WILLIAMP. KELLY                                 
| | William P. Kelly                                    
| | Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

May 2, 2006
§ 5.48 Marking of aircraft. ( a ) Aircraft owned by members of the Auxiliary or that are personal property of the Auxiliary may also display the Auxiliary emblem on both sides of the vertical stabilizer (outside of the stabilizer for twin tail aircraft) or on both sides of the fuselage aft of the wing.
( b ) Aircraft which are accepted as facilities may be marked with the Auxiliary mark (§ 5.43) and/or the word “RESCUE” on the underside of the wing or fuselage for easier identification from the ground.
§ 3030.101 Definitions. ( a ) The definitions in paragraphs (b) through (l) of this section apply to this part.
( b ) *Annual limitation* means the annual limitation on the percentage change in rates equal to the change in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) unadjusted for seasonal variation over the most recently available 12-month period preceding the date the Postal Service files a request to review its notice of rate adjustment, as determined by the Commission.
( c ) *Banked rate authority* means unused rate adjustment authority accumulated for future use pursuant to the rules in this part.
( d ) A *class* of mail means the First-Class Mail, USPS Marketing Mail, Periodicals, Package Services, or Special Services groupings of market dominant Postal Service products or services. Generally, the regulations in this part are applicable to individual classes of mail.
( e ) *Density rate authority* means rate authority that is available to all classes to address the effects of decreases in density of mail.
( f ) *Maximum rate adjustment authority* means the maximum percentage change in rates available to a class for any planned increase in rates. It is the sum of: The consumer price index rate authority, and any available density rate authority, retirement obligation rate authority, banked rate authority, and rate authority applicable to non-compensatory classes.
( g ) *Rate authority applicable to non-compensatory classes* means rate authority available to classes where revenue for each product within the class was insufficient to cover that product's attributable costs as determined by the Commission.
( h ) *Rate cell* means each and every separate rate identified as a rate of general applicability.
( i ) *Rate incentive* means a discount that is not a workshare discount and that is designed to increase or retain volume, improve the value of mail for mailers, or improve the operations of the Postal Service.
( j ) *Rate of general applicability* means a rate applicable to all mail meeting standards established by the Mail Classification Schedule, the Domestic Mail Manual, and the International Mail Manual. A rate is not a rate of general applicability if eligibility for the rate is dependent on factors other than the characteristics of the mail to which the rate applies, including the volume of mail sent by a mailer in a past year or years. A rate is not a rate of general applicability if it benefits a single mailer. A rate that is only available upon the written agreement of both the Postal Service and a mailer, a group of mailers, or a foreign postal operator is not a rate of general applicability.
( k ) *Retirement obligation rate authority* means rate authority that is available to all classes to provide revenue for remittance towards the statutorily mandated amortization payments for unfunded liabilities.
( l ) A *seasonal or temporary rate* is a rate that is in effect for a limited and defined period of time.
#### § 953.16 Disposition.

Mail matter found to be nonmailable shall be held at the post office where detained for a period of 15 days from the date of the Postal Service decision, unless that period is extended by the Judicial Officer. During this holding period, the appellant may apply for the withdrawal of the matter. If any such application is made, the General Counsel or Chief Postal Inspector or his or her designee shall be given notice and the opportunity to oppose the application. Upon the expiration of the holding period with no application having been made, the Judicial Officer shall order that the matter be disposed of in accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3001(b). If a timely application is made, the Judicial Officer shall consider the application and any reasons advanced by the General Counsel or Chief Postal Inspector or his or her designee for denying the application. The Judicial Officer shall thereafter order either that the matter be returned to the applicant or that it be disposed of in accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3001(b).

[59 FR 31538, June 20, 1994, as amended at 71 FR 53972, Sept. 13, 2006]
§ 266.6 Appeal procedure. ( a ) *Appeal procedure.* ( 1 ) If a request for notification of or to inspect, copy, or amend a record is denied, in whole or in part, or if no determination is made within the period prescribed by this part, the requester may appeal to the General Counsel, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20260-1101.
( 2 ) The requester must submit an appeal in writing within 90 days of the date of denial, or within 90 days of such request if the appeal is from a failure of the custodian to make a determination. The letter of appeal should include, as applicable: ( i ) Reasonable identification of the record to which the requester sought notification, access, or amendment;
( ii ) A statement of the Postal Service action or failure to act, and of the relief sought; and
( iii ) A copy of the request, of the notification of denial, and of any other related correspondence, if any.
( 3 ) Any record found on appeal to be incomplete, inaccurate, not relevant, or not timely, must be appropriately amended within 30 working days of the date of such findings.
( 4 ) The decision of the General Counsel constitutes the final decision of the Postal Service on the right of the requester to be notified of; inspect, copy, or otherwise have access to; or change or update a record. The decision on the appeal must be in writing and, in the event of a denial, must set forth the reasons for such denial and state the individual's right to obtain judicial review in a district court. An indexed file of decisions on appeals must be maintained by the General Counsel.
( b ) *Submission of statement of disagreement.* If the final decision concerning a request for the amendment of a record does not satisfy the requester, any statement of reasonable length provided by that individual setting forth a position regarding the disputed information will be accepted and attached to the relevant personal record.