alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE


Gettysburg National Military Park Advisory Commission

AGENCY:  National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION:  Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This notice sets forth the date of the thirty-first meeting 
of the Gettysburg National Military Park Advisory Commission.

DATES:  The public meeting will be held on February 16, 2000, from 7 
p.m.-9 p.m.

LOCATION: The meeting will be held at Cyclorama Auditorium, 125 
Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.

AGENDA: Sub-Committee Reports, Federal Consistency Projects Within the 
Gettysburg Battlefield Historic District, Operational Update on Park 
Activities, Election of Officers for year 2000 and Citizens Open Forum.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  John A. Latschar, Superintendent, 
Gettysburg National Military Park, 97 Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, 
Pennsylvania 17325.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. Any 
member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement 
concerning agenda items. The statement should be addressed to the 
Advisory Commission, Gettysburg National Military Park, 97 Taneytown 
Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325. Minutes of the meeting will be 
available for inspection four weeks after the meeting at the permanent 
headquarters of the Gettysburg National Military Park located at 97 
Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.

    Dated: January 13, 2000.
John McKenna,
Acting Superintendent, Gettysburg NMP/Eisenhower NHS.
[FR Doc. 00-1509 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**ALLIANCEGAMING CORPORATION**

**FORM10-Q**

 

**December 31,2003**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Gaming Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Robert L. Miodunski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securitiesand Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operation of the Company.

 

 

Dated:February 10, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Robert L. Miodunski |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Miodunski     |
| Director, President and |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Order entered October 7, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00476

- CR

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ SAL DANA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14

- 47041

- U



### O RDER

Before the Court is court reporter Sasha Brooks’ October 1

, 2019 request for two

additional days in which to file the reporter’s record . We GRANT the request. Th e reporter’s

record received on October 3, 2019 has been filed as of that date.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5267

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

at 100 Federal Plaza in Central Islip, New York,as the ‘‘Theodore Roosevelt United States Courthouse’’.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5267

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 100

Federal Plaza in Central Islip, New York, as the ‘‘Theodore Roosevelt United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5267 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 100 Federal

3 Plaza in Central Islip, New York, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Theodore Roosevelt United States Court5 house’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Theodore Roosevelt United

11 States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 2,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 52.31 Consideration of application.

Each application shall be reviewed by the Chair to determine whether it meets the requirements of § 52.21 before it is docketed. The Chair shall decide in appropriate cases whether to grant a hearing or to recommend disposition on the merits without a hearing.
#### § 337.0 Purpose.

The practices and procedures part of this regulation apply to all Corps operations and maintenance activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill material in waters of the U.S. and ocean waters and related activities of local interests accomplished to ensure continued functions of constructed Corps projects.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

596 

KA 07-00531 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ORLANDO HERNANDEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR.,

OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John R.

Schwartz, A.J.), rendered December 11, 2006. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law, the plea is vacated and the matter is

remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the

indictment. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the second degree

(Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.10 [1]). Although County Court was required

to sentence defendant to a five-year period of postrelease supervision

based upon his status as a second felony offender (see § 70.45 [former

(2)]; People v Motley [appeal No. 3], 56 AD3d 1158, 1159), at the plea

the court informed defendant only that he would be sentenced to the

“minimum” period of postrelease supervision. Because the court failed

to specify the period of postrelease supervision or the permissible

range of postrelease supervision prior to imposing sentence, reversal

is required (see People v Thomas, 68 AD3d 1445, 1446-1447). We reject

the People’s contention that defendant was required to preserve his

challenge to the voluntariness of the plea based on the court’s

failure, prior to sentencing, to advise him of the period of

postrelease supervision to be imposed or the parameters thereof (see

People v Boyd, 12 NY3d 390, 393; People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545-

546). “When a defendant is not made aware of mandatory postrelease

supervision—or the specific duration or range of that component of

postrelease supervision—prior to the imposition of sentence, the

voluntariness of the plea may be challenged on appeal even absent

preservation of the issue by postallocution motion” (People v Lee, 80 
-2- 596 

KA 07-00531 

AD3d 1072, 1073; see People v Murray, 15 NY3d 725).

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
1

IN THEUNITED STATESDISTRICTCOURTFORTHE

SO W H ERN D ISTRICT OF FLO RIDA

I

DONALD J.'IRLJM P, !

Plaint# No.9:22-&-81294-AMC

V.

Dated:August25,2022

UN ITED STATESO F AM ERICA,

JURYTIUALDEM ANDED

Defendant

M O TIO N TO E-FILE

1,T.E.,T.ERajK.Patel,theplaindff(prose),respedfullymovetltisCourttoallow

m etofileeledronicallyviaPACER.Ihavebeen granted IFP istheUnited StatesCourts

ofAppeals.Ihavebeen granted IFP in theUnited Statestrialcourts,both thedistdd

cout'tsandtheCoud ofFederalC'laim s.1havebeen allowed tofileelectronically in the

United StatesCotn'tofAppealsfortheFederalCircuitviaPACER.1havebeen ableto

fileelectronicallyviaacourt-assignede-m ailaddressineveryotherfederaldistrid coult

Iam also filing IF''P and willsave me the costofm ailing and produdion to prevent

prejudiceandallow forlitigadontohappenwithoutmentalstressaboutmyeconomics.

'Ihejudidaleconomymightevenbenefitfrom reducedtimeforfiling.

Forallthesereasolw Im ovethattheCourtallow m etofileeleckortically.

Respedftlllysubm itted,

/s/RajK.Patel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(prose4

6850East21stStreet

lndianapolis,IN 46219

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 1 of 3
i

:

MarionCotmty

317-450-6651(ce1)

ral'pzolo@gm ail.com

www.rajpatel.live

GVI-LEN?'>

S% +

* z +

. +

&'k %

. . o

CJ to

rjz , f x?- oo #

*e o sz

q4rr, IN ,&,-

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 2 of 3
l

I

1

1

I

i

1

I

CERTIFICA TE O F SERV ICE

IcertifythatIservedacopyoftheforegoingRajK.Patel's(ProSe)

on08/24/2022tobelow individualsv$athee-mail,consistentwith

:

NodceofAppearance

theLocalRules:

JamesM .Trusty

EFRAH ,PLLC

1717Pezm sylvaniaAvenue,NW ,Suite650

W ashington,DC 20006

202-852-5669

Email:jtrusty@ifrahlaw.com

LindseyHalligan

511SE 5thAvenue

FortLauderdale,Florida33301

lindseyhalligan@outlook,com

720-435-2870

Em ail:lindseyhalligan@ym ail.com

M .Evan Corcoran

Silverm an,Thom pson,Slutkin,& W hite,LLC

400EastPrattSkeet,Suite900

Balfim ore,M D 21230

410-385-2225

Em ail:ecorcorr @silverm r l om pson.com

Dated:August25,2022

Respectfullysubm ittedz

/s/RajPatel

T.E.,T.E.RajK.Patel(PrpSej

6850East21stStreet

Indianapolis,IN 46219

317-450-6651(ce11)

rajpzolo@gm ail.com

www.rajpatel.live

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/26/2022 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

C. D-S.,

 Respondent

 v.

B.M.D.,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 831 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
#### § 80.105 Calais, ME to Cape Small, ME.

The 72 COLREGS shall apply on the harbors, bays, and inlets on the east coast of Maine from International Bridge at Calais, ME to the southwesternmost extremity of Bald Head at Cape Small.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-cv-61574-AHS

NEIL ELBERT GUERIN, JR., 

WILLIE EVANS, JR., 

SHANICE LEGAIR,

TONI GAD,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

HEALTH INSURANCE ALLIANCE, LLC,

MARK PALTEROVICH, 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/ 

CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS 

AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, pursuant to this Court’s Order requiring a Certificate of 

Interested Persons (D.E. 5), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Defendant Health Insurance 

Alliance, LLC affirms that it has no subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, or 

publicly held corporations owning 10% or more of its stock. Defendants provide the following 

list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest 

in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations: 

a) HEALTH INSURANCE ALLIANCE, LLC – Defendant 

b) MARK PALTEROVICH – Defendant

c) Mamone Villalon – Counsel for Defendants 

d) Tyler Mamone, Esq. – Counsel for Defendants 

e) Yetian Wang, Esq. – Counsel for Defendants 

Case 0:22-cv-61574-AHS Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2022 Page 1 of 3
2 

f) NEIL ELBERT GUERIN, JR. – Plaintiff

g) WILLIE EVANS, JR. – Plaintiff

h) SHANICE LEGAIR – Plaintiff

i) TONI GAD – Plaintiff

j) Koz Law, P.A. – Counsel for Plaintiffs 

k) Elliot Kozolchyk, Esq. – Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Dated: October 18, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Tyler A. Mamone 

Tyler A. Mamone, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 111632 

Yetian Wang, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 1025778 

MAMONE VILLALON 

100 SE 2nd St., Suite 2000 

Miami, Florida, 33131 

Tel: (786) 209-2379 

E-mail: tyler@mvlawpllc.com

Case 0:22-cv-61574-AHS Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2022 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 18, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send a notice of such filing to all 

counsel of record as indicated on the service list. 

By: /s/ Tyler A. Mamone 

Tyler A. Mamone, Esq.

Case 0:22-cv-61574-AHS Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/18/2022 Page 3 of 3
-cr-06240-WPD Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2001 P
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walker C. Tompkins, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
----------------------------------
Name:  Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 9, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under
that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22890-CIV-WILLIAMS/MCALILEY

WILLIE JAMES WILLIAMS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY &

CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER OF RECUSAL

THE UNDERSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE to whom the above-styled case has 

been assigned hereby recuses herself and refers the matter to the Clerk of Court for 

reassignment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and S.D. Fla. Local Rule 3.6.

DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at Miami, Florida, this 13th day of September

2022.

____________________________________

CHRIS MCALILEY 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This cause will be reassigned by the Clerk’s Office in accordance with the Local 

Rules for the Southern District of Florida and the applicable Administrative Order. 

Case 1:22-cv-22890-KMW Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

All documents for filing in this case shall carry the following case number and 

designation: 22-22890-CIV-WILLIAMS/_______.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT this _______ day of September 2022, Miami, 

Florida.

ANGELA E. NOBLE

Clerk of Court

By:__________________________

cc: The Honorable Kathleen M. Williams

Counsel of Record

Torres

15th

/s/Valerie Kemp

Case 1:22-cv-22890-KMW Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2022 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23266-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

JUAN ZUNIGA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, 

Acting Commissioner of 

Social Security,

Defendant.

______________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff Juan C. Zuniga’s (“Claimant”) Motion 

for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support of Remanding the Case to the Commissioner of 

Social Security, ECF No. [17] (“Claimant’s Motion for Summary Judgment”), and Defendant 

Kilolo Kijakazi Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) Motion for 

Summary Judgment with Supporting Memorandum of Law and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment (“Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment”), ECF No. [18] 

(collectively, “Motions”). The Motions were previously referred to the Honorable Judge Alicia M. 

Otazo-Reyes for a Report and Recommendations (“R&R”) on all dispositive matters. See ECF No. 

[14]. On July 10, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued a R&R recommending that Claimant’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment be denied, and Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment be 

granted. ECF No. [20]. The R&R states that the parties shall file any objections within fourteen 

days of the date of service of a copy of the R&R. Id. To date, Claimant has filed no objections, nor 

has Claimant sought additional time in which to do so.

Case 1:22-cv-23266-BB Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 22-cv-23266-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

2

Nevertheless, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the R&R, the record in this 

case, and is otherwise fully advised. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) 

(citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Court finds the R&R to be well reasoned and 

correct. The Court therefore agrees with the analysis in the R&R and concludes that Claimant’s 

Motion for Summary Judgment must be denied, and Commissioner’s Motion for Summary 

Judgment must be granted for the reasons set forth therein.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The R&R, ECF No. [20], is ADOPTED; 

2. Claimant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. [17], is DENIED;

3. Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. [18], is GRANTED; 

4. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on July 25, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23266-BB Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/25/2023 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4884 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4884

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 200 West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, as the ``William S. 
                   Broomfield Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 
West 2nd Street in Royal Oak, Michigan, and known as the Royal Oak Post 
Office, shall be known and designated as the ``William S. Broomfield 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William S. Broomfield Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-2348

___________________________

Orlando Martinez

lllllllllllllllllllll Appellant

v.

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________

 Submitted: March 21, 2013

Filed: March 26, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Orlando Martinez appeals the district court’s denial of his

1

motion to return property. After careful review, see Jackson v. United States,

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.
526 F.3d 394, 396 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude that the motion was properly denied

for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

______________________________

-2-