alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CEM Inputs ID Number: FRET 09-0536

Product: unknown Chemical Name: CAS 1464989-16-9

Scenario: Laundry Detergent Population: Adult

Molecular Weight (g/mole): 192.3 Vapor Pressure (torr) 0.0135

Consumer Product Weight Fraction -

Central Tendency (unitless):

0.01 Consumer Product Weight Fraction -

High-End (unitless):

0.25

Inhalation Inputs

Frequency of Use (chronic) (events/yr): 300 Exposure Duration (chronic) (years): 57

Frequency of Use (acute) (events/day): 1 Exposure Duration (acute) (days): 1

Mass of Product Used per Event - Central 

Tendency (g):

61.5 Mass of Product Used per Event - High-End 

(g):

123

Inhalation Rate During Use (m3/hr): 0.74 Duration of Event - Central Tendency 

(hours/event):

0.667

Inhalation Rate After Use (m3/hr): 0.611 Duration of Event - High-End (hours/event): 1.42

Zone 1 Volume (m3): 36 Whole House Volume (m3): 523

Air Exchange Rate (air exchanges/hr): 0.45 Body Weight (kg): 80

Activity Patterns (Note: 1=Bedroom 2= Kitchen 3=Bathroom 4=Living Room 

 5=Utility Room 6=Car 7=Out)

User: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 5 4 2 4 6 7 4 2 2 7 4 4 4 1 

Non-User: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 4 4 2 4 7 7 4 2 2 7 4 4 4 1 

Hour: 0 6 12 18

Start Time: 7 Room of Use: 2. Kitchen

Dermal Inputs

Frequency of Use (chronic) (events/yr): 300 SA/BW (cm2/kg): 12.3

Frequency of Use (acute) (events/day): 1

Exposure Duration (chronic) (years): 57

Amount Retained / Absorbed to Skin 

(g/cm2-event):

3.49e-05 Exposure Duration (acute) (days): 1

Averaging Time (chronic) (days): 2.85e+04 Averaging Time (acute) (days) : 1
CEM Inhalation Exposure Estimates

ID Number: FRET 09-0536

Scenario: Laundry Detergent (Machine Washing) Population: Adult

Exposure Duration (years) chronic: 57 Exposure Duration (days) acute: 1

Exposure Units Result AT (days)

Chronic Cancer

 LADDpot (mg/kg-day) 3.94e-04 2.85e+04

 LADCpot (mg/m3) 1.89e-03 2.85e+04

Acute

 ADRpot (mg/kg-day) 7.05e-02 1

 Cppot (mg/m3) 4.54e+00 NA

LADD - Lifetime Average Daily Dose (mg/kg-day) LADC - Lifetime Average Daily Concentration (mg/m3)

ADR - Acute Dose Rate (mg/kg-day) Cp - Peak Concentration (mg/m3)

Note: 75 years = 2.738e+04 days pot - potential dose

Note: The general Agency guidance for assessing short-term, infrequent events (for most chemicals, an exposure of less than 24 

hours that occurs no more frequently than monthly) is to treat such events as independent, acute exposures rather than as 

chronic exposure. (Methods for Exposure-Response Analysis for Acute Inhalation Exposure to Chemicals (External 

Review Draft). EPA/600/R-98/051. April 1998)
CEM Dermal Exposure Estimates

ID Number: FRET 09-0536

Scenario: Laundry Detergent (Hand Washing) Population: Adult

Exposure Duration (chronic) (years): 57 Exposure Duration (acute) (days): 1

Exposure Units Result AT (days)

Chronic Cancer

 LADDpot (mg/kg-day) 2.58e-03 2.85e+04

Acute

 ADRpot (mg/kg-day) 1.07e-01 1

LADD - Lifetime Average Daily Dose (mg/kg-day)

ADR - Acute Dose Rate (mg/kg-day)
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 722 

Recognizing January 2, 2009, as ‘‘National Advertising Specialty Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 20), 2008 

Mr. SPECTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing January 2, 2009, as ‘‘National Advertising 

Specialty Day’’. 

Whereas an advertising specialty is any item imprinted with 

a logo or slogan and given out to promote a company, organization, product, service, special achievement, or 

event; 

Whereas the presidential campaign of George Washington 

first used advertising specialties in the United States in 

1789, in the form of collectible buttons; 

Whereas there are more than 750,000 varieties of specialty 

advertising; 

Whereas the advertising specialty industry employs more 

than 344,000 professionals across the United States, and 

85 percent of these professionals are employed by smallmstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•SRES 722 IS 

or medium-sized businesses, some of which gross up to 

$1,000,000 per year; 

Whereas the advertising specialty industry has grown an average of 4 percent each year since 2003 and reached 

$19,600,000,000 in 2007; 

Whereas advertising specialties accounted for 14 percent of 

all tracked advertising spending in the United States in 

2007; and 

Whereas the advertising specialty industry accounts for more 

than 9,000 jobs in Pennsylvania: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes January 2, 2009, as ‘‘National 

3 Advertising Specialty Day’’; and 

4 (2) acknowledges the contributions the specialty 

5 advertising industry makes to the economy of the 

6 United States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00005

- CV

D. C., Jr. , Appellant

v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 20

- 0092

- CPS395 , THE HONORABLE RYAN D. LARSON , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant D. C., Jr. filed his notice of appeal on January 5, 2022

. The appellate
record was complete on January 21, 2022 , making appellant’s brief due on February 9, 2022

.
On February 8, 2022 , counsel fo r appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file
appellant’s brief.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals

from suits for te rmination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 day s
for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting
extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order Kenneth A

. Ric hey, Jr. to file
appellant’s brief no later than March 1, 2022

. If the b ri ef is not filed by that date, counsel may
be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on February 1 6 , 2022.2

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5266 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5266

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
                     For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SAEED REZAI.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Saeed Rezai shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Saeed Rezai enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.

    Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence to 
Saeed Rezai, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer 
to reduce by one, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 202(e) of such Act.

SEC. 3. DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN 
              RELATIVES.

    The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Saeed Rezai shall 
not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, 
or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 334.746 U.S. Coast Guard, Destin Station at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla.; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The restricted area shall encompass all navigable waters of the United States, as defined at 33 CFR part 329, within the area bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates: Commencing from the shoreline at latitude 30°23′33.45′′ N, longitude 86°31′37.51′′ W; thence to latitude 30°23′35.67′′ N, longitude 86°31′37.31′′ W; thence to latitude 30°23′33.68′′ N, longitude 86°31′30.98′′ W; thence to latitude 30°23′32.00′′ N, longitude 86°31′28.80′′ W; thence proceeding directly to a point on the shoreline at latitude 30°23′30.14′′ N, longitude 86°31′30.21′′ W.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) No person or vessel shall enter the area without the permission of the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Destin Station, Florida, or his/her authorized representative.
( 2 ) The area identified in paragraph (a) of this section and the associated restrictions described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section are in effect 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Destin Station, and such agencies as he/she may designate.
[76 FR 75457, Dec. 2, 2011]
Order entered January 3, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01041-CV

VSDH VAQUERO VENTURE, LTD., EVAN L. SHAW

AND DOUGLAS M. HICKOK, Appellants/Cross-Appellees

V.

KEN GROSS AND BETSY GROSS, Appellees/Cross-Appellants

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-09-05232-A

ORDER

Before the Court is the December 28, 2016 second unopposed motion for extension of 

time to file appellees’/cross-appellants’ briefs. We GRANT the motion and ORDER

appellees’/cross-appellants’ briefs filed on or before January 13, 2017. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DADE DIVISION 

ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-22965-RS

Plaintiff,

vs.

RON JON SURF SHOP OF FLA., INC.

a Foreign for Profit Corporation 

Defendant,

____________________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby gives the 

Court notice that Plaintiff, ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA and Defendant, RON JON SURF SHOP 

OF FLA., INC., have reached a settlement in this matter.

Respectfully Submitted,

MENDEZ LAW OFFICES, PLLC

Attorney for Plaintiff

P.O. BOX 228630

Miami, Florida 33172

Telephone: 305.264.9090

Facsimile: 305.809.8474

Email:info@mendezlawoffices.com

By: /s/ Diego German Mendez

DIEGO GERMAN MENDEZ, ESQ.

FL BAR NO.: 52748

###

Case 1:22-cv-22965-RS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 386.9 Investment-grade ratings. ( a ) At the time a prospective borrower submits an application, the Corps shall require a preliminary rating opinion letter. The letter is a conditional credit assessment from a NRSRO that provides a preliminary indication of the project's overall creditworthiness and that specifically addresses the potential of the project's senior debt obligations, which may include, or be limited to, the Federal credit instrument to achieve an investment-grade rating, and address the rating of obligations similar to those proposed for the Federal credit instrument when the Federal credit instrument is not a senior debt obligation. The requirement of this paragraph (a) may be met, on a case-by-case basis, by accepting a recent credit rating of obligations that have a lien on the revenues pledged for repayment. This rating should be based on an unenhanced analysis of the underlying pledged source of repayment and not give any credit to any prospective loan guarantee provided by the U.S. Government.
( b ) Consistent with 33 U.S.C. 3907(a)(D)(ii), the full funding of a Federal credit instrument shall be contingent on: ( 1 ) The assignment of investment-grade ratings by NRSROs to all project obligations that have a lien on the pledged security senior to that of the Federal credit instrument on the pledged security; or
( 2 ) ( i ) In the event that the Federal credit instrument is: ( A ) A senior debt obligation;
( B ) Pari passu with the senior project obligations; or
( C ) A general obligation of the prospective borrower, to the Federal credit instrument.
( ii ) The applicant must provide at least one final rating opinion letter which provides a credit rating on the direct loan or the unenhanced Federal credit instrument. This rating should be based on an unenhanced analysis of the underlying pledged source of repayment and not give any credit to the loan or loan guarantee provided by the U.S. Government.
( c ) Neither the preliminary rating opinion letter nor the final ratings should reflect the effect of bond insurance, unless that insurance provides credit enhancement that secures WIFIA obligation.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5086

To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to honor Dr. Nancy Foster.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. SAXTON (for himself and Mr. FARR of California) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to honor

Dr. Nancy Foster.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF DR. NANCY FOSTER

4 OCEANOGRAPHIC SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.

5 The National Marine Sanctuaries Act (16 U.S.C.

6 1431 et seq.) is amended by redesignating section 317 as

7 section 318, and by inserting after section 316 the fol8 lowing:
2

•HR 5086 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 317. DR. NANCY FOSTER OCEANOGRAPHIC SCHOLAR2 SHIP PROGRAM.

3 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall estab4 lish and administer through the National Ocean Service

5 the Dr. Nancy Foster Oceanographic Scholarship Pro6 gram. Under the program, the Secretary shall award grad7 uate education scholarships in oceanography or maritime

8 cultural studies, to be known as Dr. Nancy Foster Oceano9 graphic Scholarships.

10 ‘‘(b) PURPOSES.—The purposes of the Dr. Nancy

11 Foster Oceanographic Scholarship Program are—

12 ‘‘(1) to recognize outstanding scholarship by

13 women and members of minority groups in oceanog14 raphy or maritime cultural studies; and

15 ‘‘(2) to encourage independent graduate level

16 research in oceanography and maritime cultural

17 studies.

18 ‘‘(c) AWARD.—Each Dr. Nancy Foster Oceano19 graphic Scholarship—

20 ‘‘(1) shall be used to support graduate studies

21 in oceanography or maritime cultural studies at a

22 graduate level institution of higher education; and

23 ‘‘(2) shall be awarded in accordance with guide24 lines issued by the Secretary.

25 ‘‘(d) DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS.—The amount of

26 each Dr. Nancy Foster Oceanographic Scholarship shall
3

•HR 5086 IH

1 be provided directly to a recipient selected by the Sec2 retary upon receipt of certification that the recipient will

3 adhere to a specific and detailed plan of study and re4 search approved by a graduate level institution of higher

5 education.

6 ‘‘(e) FUNDING.—Of the amount available each fiscal

7 year to carry out this title, the Secretary shall award 1

8 percent as Dr. Nancy Foster Oceanographic Scholarships.

9 ‘‘(f) SCHOLARSHIP REPAYMENT REQUIREMENT.—

10 The Secretary shall require an individual receiving a schol11 arship under this section to repay the full amount of the

12 scholarship to the Secretary if the Secretary determines

13 that the individual, in obtaining or using the scholarship,

14 engaged in fraudulent conduct or failed to comply with

15 any term or condition of the scholarship.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7626

WILLIAM W. WILKINS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DOCTOR SARAF, MD; L. GARRIS, RN; DANE HOWELL,

NP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-95-243-AM)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William W. Wilkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's complaint was dismissed

without prejudice to his right to file a proper claim alleging

facts that show specific injury to himself. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b).

Because Appellant may be able to save this action by amending his

complaint, the dismissal order which Appellant seeks to appeal is

not an appealable final order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar

Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly

we dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 6.14-2 Condition of waterfront facility a danger to vessel.

Whenever the Captain of the Port finds that the mooring of any vessel to a wharf, dock, pier, or other waterfront structure would endanger such vessel, or any other vessel, or the harbor or any facility therein by reason of conditions existing on or about such wharf, dock, pier, or other waterfront structure, including inadequate guard service, insufficient lighting, fire hazards, inadequate fire protection, unsafe machinery, internal disturbance, damage to any data, information, network, program, system, or other digital infrastructure, actual or threatened cyber incident, or unsatisfactory operation, the Captain of the Port may prevent the mooring of any vessel to such wharf, dock, pier, or other waterfront structure until the unsatisfactory condition or conditions so found are corrected, and the Captain of the Port may, for the same reasons, after any vessel has been moored, compel the shifting of such vessel from any such wharf, dock, pier, or other waterfront structure.

[E.O. 14116, 89 FR 13973, Feb. 26, 2024]
§ 273.7 Concurrence of Attorney General. ( a ) The Attorney General is required by 31 U.S.C. 3803(b) to respond to the Reviewing Official's written notice described in § 273.6 within 90 days. The Reviewing Official may refer allegations of liability to the Judicial Officer only if the Attorney General or his designee approves such action in a written statement which specifies: ( 1 ) That the Attorney General or his designee approves the referral to the Judicial Officer of the allegations of liability set forth in the notice described in § 273.6; and
( 2 ) That the initiation of a proceeding under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act is appropriate.
( b ) If at any time after the Attorney General approves the referral of a case to the Judicial Officer, the Attorney General or his designee transmits to the Postmaster General a written finding that the continuation of any proceeding under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act with respect to a claim or statement may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action related to such claim or statement, such proceeding shall be immediately stayed and may be resumed only upon written authorization of the Attorney General.
§ 83.29 Pilot vessels (Rule 29). ( a ) A vessel engaged on pilotage duty shall exhibit: ( i ) At or near the masthead, two all-round lights in a vertical line, the upper being white and the lower red;
( ii ) When underway, in addition, sidelights and a sternlight; and
( iii ) When at anchor, in addition to the lights prescribed in paragraph (i) of this Rule, the anchor light, lights, or shape prescribed in Rule 30 (§ 83.30) for vessels at anchor.
( b ) A pilot vessel when not engaged on pilotage duty shall exhibit the lights or shapes prescribed for a vessel of her length.
[USCG-2012-0102, 79 FR 37912, July 2, 2014, as amended by USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44280, July 27, 2015]
EXHIBIT
      32.3


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**






In
      connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 of U-Haul
      International, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on February 8, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Robert T. Peterson, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






U-HAUL
      INTERNATIONAL, INC.,


a
      Nevada
      corporation


/s/
      Robert T. Peterson


Robert
      T.
      Peterson


Chief
      Financial Officer


Date:
      February 7, 2007