alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFluctuating pressures on fan blades of a turbofan engine, flight test investigationMiniature pressure transducers were used to measure the fluctuating pressure on the fan blades of a JT15D engine in flight to aid in understanding fan-noise generation. Although the blade pressures can be considered very useful in determining far-field noise sources in the subsonic fan-blade tip speeds, other mechanisms, and as shock waves in the transonic and supersonic fan-blade tip speeds, limit their usefulness in these higher speed ranges.Document ID19850011480Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsSchoenster, J. A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1985Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2381NAS 1.60:2381L-15700Accession Number85N19790Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-33Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850011480.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

LARRY GILLIARD, a/k/a WILLIAM ) LARRY GILLIARD; and JEWEL ) GILLIARD, a/k/a SAMANTHA JEWEL ) GILLIARD, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2004 ) GELT FUNDING, LLP, a Florida ) limited liability partnership, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 9, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardee County; Marcus J. Ezelle, Judge. Larry Gilliard and Jewel Gilliard, pro se. No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF ASIAINFO HOLDINGS, INC.



|                                                             |  |                                             
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                                                   |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|AsiaInfo H.K. Limited                                        |  | Hong Kong                                   
|                                                             | 
|AsiaInfo (H.K.) Systems Co. Ltd.                             |  | Hong Kong                                   
|                                                             | 
|AsiaInfo Technologies (Chengdu), Inc.                        |  | China                                       
|                                                             | 
|AsiaInfo Technologies (China), Inc.                          |  | China                                       
|                                                             | 
|Bonson Information Technology Ltd.                           |  | British Virgin Islands                      
|                                                             | 
|Beijing Star VATS Technologies, Inc.                         |  | China                                       
|                                                             | 
|Lenovo-AsiaInfo Technologies, Inc.                           |  | China                                       
|                                                             | 
|Lenovo Computer System and Technology Services Ltd.          |  | China                                       
|                                                             | 
|Lenovo Security Technologies (Beijing), Inc.                 |  | China                                       
|                                                             | 
|Shanghai Xinjia Information and Technology Co., Ltd.         |  | China                                       
|                                                             | 
|AsiaInfo International Pte Ltd.                              |  | Singapore                                   
|                                                             | 
|SmartCall Holding Ltd.                                       |  | Cayman Islands                              
|                                                             | 
|SmartCall Group Ltd.                                         |  | Hong Kong                                   
|                                                             | 
|Beijing Shangxin Yitong Information and Technology Co., Ltd. |  | China                                       
|                                                             | 
|Beijing Zhongxinjia Sci-Tech Development Co., Ltd.           |  | China
JEFFERY L. GIBBS

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILE D

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3151

Opinion filed August 5, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Jeffery L. Gibbs, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and MARSTILLER, JJ.

, CONCUR.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1382 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-053-AD

Helicopter Model: Enstrom Helicopter Corporation Model F-28C, F-28C-2, F-28F, 280C, 280F, 

280FX TH-28, 480, and 480B Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 207 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: This AD was prompted by four failures in the cyclic trim system on certain Enstrom 

model helicopters that resulted in reduced controllability of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $327 (Model 480, 480B, and TH-28)

$383 (Model 280C, 280F, 280FX, F-28C, 

F-28C-2, and F-28F)

Labor per Helicopter

(4 x $85/work-hour)

$340

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $667 (Model 480, 480B, and TH-28)

$723 (Model 280C, 280F, 280FX, F-28C, 

F-28C-2, and F-28F)

Total US Fleet Cost $

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gregory J. Michalik
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALASKA
AIRLINES INC. SECOND QUARTER 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          152500
<SECURITIES>                                    197400
<RECEIVABLES>                                    93900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      23600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                555900
<PP&E>                                         1260400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  378300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1531200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           641500
<BONDS>                                         183300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      484099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1531200
<SALES>                                         747200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                747200
<CGS>                                           667000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   667000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  84800
<INCOME-TAX>                                     33700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              51100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     51100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from Credco's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30,
1999 and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the nine
months ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000,000

<S>                             <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  563
<SECURITIES>                                            956
<RECEIVABLES>                                        21,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                            612
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       23,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                              20,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  1
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         23,561
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,545
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         17
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        443
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         263
<INCOME-TAX>                                             92
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     171
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                            171
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
Dismissed; Opinion Filed October 10, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01222

- CR

KEMONE DUANE RODGERS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 8

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA16

- 18372

- J


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck On October 2, 2019, Kemone Duane Rodger s filed his pro se notice of appeal seeking to
appeal the trial court’s “oral denial of the “DEFENDANT’S AMENDED MOTION TO SET

ASIDE COMPLAINT.” W e conclude we lack jurisdiction over this appeal.

A pretrial motion, such as appellant ’ s amended motion to se t aside the information and
complaint, may not be appealed until there is a final judgment. See Ex parte Smith , 178 S.W.3d
797, 801 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) ; Apolinar v. State , 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) ; Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1998, no pet.)

. Therefore, a ny issues
appellant may have with the complaint are not ripe for review. See Smith , 178 S.W.3d at 801;
Apolinar , 820 S.W.2d at 794. If , however, he is convicted, appellant may challenge the information

and comp laint on direct appeal

.We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b) 191222F.U05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KEMONE DUANE RODGERS, Appellant

No. 05

- 19

- 01222

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 8, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MA16

- 18372

- J. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, Chief Justice Burns and Justice Whitehill participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered this 10 th day of October, 2019.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FY...report to Congress onimplementation of the E-Government Act**
 
2003 | 2004| 2005 | 2006| 2007 | 2008| 2009 | 2011| 2012 | 2013
 
SuDoc Number:PREX 2.37/3:
Item Number:0854-A-13 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000644385
 
December 19, 2019
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-11-0339

SAT Date: 5/6/2011

Print Date: 11/29/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 31

Exposure Based Review:

Health: Yes Exposure based testing (health): Inhalation testing

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG, ONCO, MUTA (UNCERT); IMMUNOTOX (UNCERT) 

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-11-0339

FATE: 

Solid 

S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)
POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low - v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes based on analogs. There is 

concern for lung overload if inhaled based on poorly soluble particulates and nano sized 

materials. There is also concern for oncogenicity if inhaled and based on the nano size of the 

PMN material. Uncertain concern for mutagenicity and immunotoxicity. 

 Test Data: : negative in Salmonella and E coli with and 

without activation

negative for chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes (in vitro)

not a skin irritant

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers-carbon; 

SAR chemical class = polymer-nonionic-carbon nanotubes; MW > 1,000,000 solid with 

unknown mp (P); S < 0.001 mg/L at 20 °C or negligible (P); pH7; effective concentrations 

based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as 

CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-nonionic-carbon

Ecotox Category 
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice                           ( print page 37400)                        is hereby given of the following meeting.                

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, ZDK1 GRB 4 (01).                    

*Date:*                         June 16, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 am to 2:00 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites Hotel, 1300 Concourse Drive, Linthicum, Maryland 21090.                    

*Contact Person:*                         William E. Elzinga, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 647, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, (301) 594-8895.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 8, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-14960  Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of U-Haul
International, Inc., certify that:

1.   the Quarterly Report of U-Haul International, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U-Haul
International, Inc.




                                             /s/ EDWARD J. SHOEN
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Edward J. Shoen
                                             President
                                             September 26, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5312 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5312

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to protect children from drug 
                              traffickers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Our Children From Drugs 
Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR USING MINORS TO 
              DISTRIBUTE DRUGS.

    Section 420 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 861) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``3 years''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``5 years''.

SEC. 3. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR DISTRIBUTING DRUGS TO 
              MINORS.

    Section 418 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 859) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``3 years''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``5 years''.

SEC. 4. INCREASED MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR DRUG TRAFFICKING IN 
              OR NEAR A SCHOOL OR OTHER PROTECTED LOCATION.

    Section 419 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 860) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``one year'' and 
        inserting ``3 years''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``three years'' each 
        place that term appears and inserting ``5 years''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 17, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5312

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to protect children from drug 
                              traffickers.
```