alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Board of Taxation

No. 78-187

#### Joseph Frost v. Town of Candia

December 29, 1978

*924
      *Joseph Frost,*of Candía, pro se.

*Sullivan & Wynot,*of Manchester *{Edward D. Wynot*orally), for the town of Candía.

Memorandum Opinion

This case concerns the proper construction of RSAch. 79-A (Supp. 1977), this State’s current-use-taxation statute. A majority of the board of taxation ruled that a “change in use,” RSA79-A:7 II (Supp. 1977), occurs so as to subject land to the land use change tax at the time a subdivision plan is approved rather than when there is an actual change in the use of the land. The town of Candía appealed. We reverse and adopt the reasoning of the dissenting opinion of board member Johnson that the change in use occurs when the actual use changes.

The purpose of RSA ch. 79-A is “to encourage preservation of open space” by removing the pressure of taxes at rates based on more extensive use. RSA 79-A:l (Supp. 1977). It provides, however, for a change of use tax of ten percent on land which has been classified for open space assessment “when it is changed to a use which does not qualify for open space assessment.” RSA 79-A:7 I (Supp. 1977).

That section, in referring to the time when the tax is to be imposed, employs the following terms: “as of the actual date of the change in use,” “upon the change in land use,” “when the use is changed” and “at the time of the change in use.” The obtaining of subdivision approval does not by itself change the use to which the land is put. *See Blue Mountain Forest Ass’n v. Croydon,*117 N.H. 365, 379, 373 A.2d 1313, 1321 (1977). An owner may obtain subdivision approval but delay for years the actual change in use. By continuing the tax advantage of open-space taxation until there has been an actual change in use, the preservation of open space is encouraged and the purpose of the statute is advanced.

We therefore hold that the change-in-use tax does not apply upon subdivision approval but upon the actual change in use.

*Appeal sustained; remanded.*

Bois, J., did not sit.
#### Sterling Lumber Company v. Fred D. Stinson.

Filed June 26, 1894.

No. 5799.

Account Stated: Sufficiency of Evidence. Where plaintiff sued on an account stated, and defendant denied that an account had been stated, but admitted that there was due to plaintiff a less amount than claimed, the finding of the jury sustaining the • defendant’s averments will not be disturbed when, as in this case, they are sustained by competent evidence, no error of law having occurred on the trial.

Error from the district court of Johnson county. Tried below before Babcock, J.

*J. Hall*Hitchcock, for plaintiff in error.

*D. P. Storer*and *E. Moss*Hitchcock, *contra.*

Ryan, C.

Plaintiff, by its petition filed in the district court of Johnson county, alleged that between it and the defendant *369there was stated an account whereby it was agreed that there was due from defendant to plaintiff the sum of $151.05, which sum the defendant accordingly agreed to pay; that he had failed so to do; and there was a prayer for the amount named, with interest and costs. These averments were denied by the defendant,- who admitted in his answer'that there was due from defendant to plaintiff the sum of $75, for which sum he tendered judgment. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for but $75, conformably to the verdict of a jury on a trial of these issues, and from this judgment the plaintiff prosecutes error to this court. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict rendered, for there was disputed evidence as to whether an account was stated or not. As an original question, it is probable the weight of the evidence preponderated in favor of the verdict as returned. Certainly there is no such lack of support as would justify interference by this court. The instructions of the court fairly presented to the jury the law which should be applied in determining whether or not there was an account stated. The verdict, therefore, cannot be disturbed either because of lack of evidence to sustain it, or on account of error of law in giving or refusing instructions applicable to the issues presented.

It is urged that there was error in admitting in evidence Exhibits A, B, and C. These were statements of account claimed by the defendant to have been made out by the agent of plaintiff, and were properly admissible upon that theory, to sustain the defense pleaded in the answer. As plaintiff’s cause of action was on an account stated, he could recover only by showing both the account and unqualified assent of defendant to its correctness. The court, therefore, very properly excluded from the jury’s consideration the showing made by the books of account of plaintiff, independently of the alleged account stated.

Errors are urged as to the admission of testimony, but *370as this matter was presented on the petition in error only as “errors of law occurring at the trial, duly excepted to,” they cannot be considered. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Purple Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Daniel R. Luis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: June 24, 2010



/s/ Daniel R. LuisDaniel R. LuisChief Executive Officer


This certification has been
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
October 29, 2014 

Dr. Colleen Cripps, J;>h.D. 

Administrator 

Division of Environmental Protection 

901 S. Stewat1 St., Suite 4001 

Carson City NV 89701-5249 

Dear Dr. Cripps: 

Public Health rr nl. Promol r. Pro tect. 

Enclosed is a revision to the Truckee Meadows portion of the Nevada PMw State Implementation 

Plan. The "Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the Truckee Meadows 24-hour PM10 

Non-Attaimnent Area", which is intended to supersede the 2009 subnlittal, was adopted at a public 

hearing of the Washoe County District Board ofHealth (DBOH) on August 28, 2014. The submittal 

includes: 

• Proof of publication for the public hearing; 

• Written Public Comment; 

• DBOH agenda for the August 28,2014 public hearing; 

• Staff rep<M; 

• PMw Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan; 

• Approved minutes fi:om the August 28,2014 public hearing; and 

• Certificate of Adoption. 

Two paper and two electronic copies of the submittal are enclosed. The electronic copies are exact 

duplicates of the paper copy submittal in searchable pdf format. Please review these documents and 

determine if this submittal is complete. If so, please fmward one paper and one electronic copy to the 

U.S. EPA Region IX office. Ifyou have any questions or conunents regarding this submittal, feel free 

to contact Ms. Yann Ling-Barnes or me at (775) 784-7200. 

Sincerely, 

Charlene Albee 

Division Director 

Enclosures 

cc: Yann Ling-Barnes, P.E., Washoe County Health District - AQMD (w/o enclosures) 

1001 EAST NINTH STREET I P.O. BOX 11130, RENO, NEVADA 89520 (775) 784-7200 FAX (775) 784-7225 

www. OurCieanAir.com 

WASHOE COUNlY IS AN EQUAl OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, ThomasS. Astrup, Chief Financial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.   TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 29,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.   Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of April,2008.

 

 
| By:                                                   | /s/ THOMAS S. ASTRUP |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Name: Thomas S. Astrup                                     |
| Title: Vice President-Finance and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 266.7 Schedule of fees. ( a ) *Policy.* The purpose of this section is to establish fair and equitable fees to permit duplication of records for subject individuals (or authorized representatives) while recovering the full allowable direct costs incurred by the Postal Service.
( b ) *Duplication.* ( 1 ) For duplicating any paper or micrographic record or publication or computer report, the fee is $.15 per page, except that the first 100 pages furnished in response to a particular request must be furnished without charge. See paragraph (c) of this section for fee limitations.
( 2 ) The Postal Service may at its discretion make user-paid copy machines available at any location. In that event, requesters will be given the opportunity to make copies at their own expense.
( 3 ) The Postal Service normally will not furnish more than one copy of any record. If duplicate copies are furnished at the request of the requester; a fee of $0.15 per page is charged for each copy of each duplicate page without regard to whether the requester is eligible for free copies pursuant to § 266.7(b)(1).
( c ) *Limitations.* No fee will be charged to an individual for the process of retrieving, reviewing, or amending a record pertaining to that individual.
( d ) *Reimbursement.* The Postal Service may, at its discretion, require reimbursement of its costs as a condition of participation in a computer matching program or activity with another agency. The agency to be charged is notified in writing of the approximate costs before they are incurred. Costs are calculated in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth at § 265.9.
§ 97.310 Criteria for authorization. ( a ) The Commandant will evaluate the organization's request for authorization and supporting written materials, looking for evidence of— ( 1 ) The organization's clear assignment of management duties;
( 2 ) Ethical standards for managers and cargo securing manual (CSM) reviewers;
( 3 ) Procedures for personnel training, qualification, certification, and re-qualification that are consistent with recognized industry standards;
( 4 ) Acceptable standards available for the organization's internal auditing and management review;
( 5 ) Recordkeeping standards for CSM review and approval;
( 6 ) Methods used to review and certify CSMs;
( 7 ) Experience and knowledge demonstrating competency to evaluate CSMs for completeness and sufficiency according to the requirements of SOLAS;
( 8 ) Methods for handling appeals; and
( 9 ) Overall procedures consistent with Res.A.739(18), (incorporated by reference, see § 97.110).
( b ) After a favorable evaluation of the organization's request, the Commandant may arrange to visit the organization's corporate and port offices for an on-site evaluation of operations.
( c ) When a request is approved, the organization and the Coast Guard will enter into the written agreement provided for by 33 CFR 97.315. If the request is not approved, the Commandant will give the organization a written explanation, and the organization may resubmit its request if it corrects any noted deficiencies.
Coastal

Kids’

Book

Libro de actividades costeras para niños

Activity
Seagrass beds give marine animals food and shelter. Peces y otros animales encuentran comida y protección en las hierbas marinas.

2

1, 36

2

3 4

5

6 7 8

9

10

11 12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29 30 31

32

33

34 35
Please be courteous when boating.

Por favor sea atento cuando paseando en bote.

3

NO

WAKE
Help boaters stay in the channel and protect sea grass beds.

Ayuda los pilotos de botes quedarse en los canales. Ayuda proteger las hierbas marinas.

SLOW

SPEED

Manatee Zone

Minimum Wake

4
Look for manatees when you’re boating.

Busca los manatíes cuando paseando en bote.

5

Color in the areas to find the 

manatee in the water.

= BLUE = GREEN
Prep your boat before you get to the ramp.

Prepare su bote antes de llegar a la rampa.

6

PLEASE BE

COURTEOUS
Paddling is a great way to experience nature.

Remar en piragua o en kayak es una buena manera de aprender de la naturaleza.

7
Families enjoy boating and fishing together. Las familias les gustan pasear en bote y pescar.

8
Feeding wildlife can be harmful.

Dar de comer a los animales salvajes puede ser dañino.

9
Keep the beach dark at night.

Mantenga la playa oscura de noche.

10
Dispose of fishing waste in the right place.

Después de pescar, elimina la basura apropiadamente.

11
Estuaries ar

e giant food webs.

12

Los estuarios son cadenas de comida.

13
Pick up your trash.

Recoge su basura.

14
Keep your eye to the sky. Cuando paseando en bote, mira a el cielo por señales de tormentas.

15

Help the boater

reach home before

the storm comes in.
Always file a float plan.

Siempre llene una planilla de excursión con detalles del paseo antes de salir en un bote.

16

FLOAT PLAN
Always wear a life jacket.

Siempre use un chaleco de salvavidas.

17
If it’s alive, let it survive.

Si encuentra un animal vivo, dejelo tranquilo.

18
Know your waterway symbols.

Sepa los símbolos de cursos de aguas navegables.

19

DANGER SLOW RESTRICTED

Such as

STATE PARK AHEAD,

MARINA ENTRANCE,

or ARTIFICIAL REEF

INFORMATION

SYMBOL
Enjoy Florida’s “gentle giants” from a distance.

Mire los “gigantes tiernos” de Florida desde lejos.

20
How many wildlife and boating words can you find?

21

Alligator

Birds

Boating

Channel

Dolphin

Estuaries

Fishing

Food web

Life Jacket

Manatee

Mangroves

Marine

Nature

Paddling

Protect

Sea grass

Safety

Turtle

Waterway

Wild

ESE I CR PADD L I NG

SEA BH AWA TE RWA Y

TVT OAE L TRU T S T R

UO L AN A R A PD B E U O

ARY TNO AGRO E A R T

RG T I E A R NOL WG E A

I NENLAM I TPDROG

EAFGAT AHEHOAW I

SMA R I N E S C I OS I L

EESDR I B I TN FS L L

T E KCA J EF I L AFDA
Chemicals in the water harm marine life.

Químicas en el aqua dañan los animales marinos.

22
Give wild animals their space.

Darle los animales salvajes espacio.

23
Help us protect and preserve 

our waterways and shoreline

This book was funded by the West Coast Inland Navigation District

Printing by Suncoast Media • Illustrations by Dave Anderson
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5284

AN ACT

To designate the United States customhouse located at 101 East Main Street in Norfolk, Virginia, as the ‘‘Owen B. Pickett United States

Customhouse’’.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5284

AN ACT

To designate the United States customhouse located at 101

East Main Street in Norfolk, Virginia, as the ‘‘Owen

B. Pickett United States Customhouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5284 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States customhouse located at 101 East

3 Main Street in Norfolk, Virginia, shall be known and des4 ignated as the ‘‘Owen B. Pickett United States Custom5 house’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States customhouse referred to in section 1 shall be

10 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Owen B. Pickett United

11 States Customhouse’’.

12 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

13 This Act shall take effect on January 3, 2001.

Passed the House of Representatives October 2,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 951.3 Persons ineligible for admission to practice. ( a ) No person disbarred from practice before the Postal Service or in any other executive department of any of the governmental entities mentioned in § 951.2(c) will be eligible to practice before the Postal Service until said order of disbarment shall have been revoked.
( b ) Any person who, subsequently to being admitted to practice before the Postal Service, is disbarred by any governmental entity mentioned in § 951.2(c) shall be deemed suspended from practice before the Postal Service during the pendency of said order or disbarment.
( c ) No person who has been an attorney, officer, clerk, or employee in the Postal Service will be recognized as attorney for prosecuting before it or any office thereof any case or matter which he was in anywise connected while he was such attorney, officer, clerk, or employee.
( d ) No person coming within the prohibitions of 18 U.S.C. 203, 205, or 207, will be recognized as attorney before the Postal Service or any office thereof.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Design and testing of anenergy-absorbing crewseat for the F/FB-111 aircraft [electronic resource].**
 
3916|3917|3918| 
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:3916; NAS 1.26:3917; NAS 1.26:3918

Item Number:Link0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001060857

 
July 18, 2018
Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: DRJ05142008 Page 1 of 2

SUMMARY
(In accordance with 40 CFR Part 152, this summary is available for public release after registration)

STUDY TITLE
Dow AgroSciences Response to EPA Query Regarding Two Toxicology Reports

DATA REQUIREMENTS

None

AUTHOR(S)
D.R. Juberg J.L. Mattsson

STUDY COMPLETED ON
May 14, 2008

PERFORMING LABORATORY
Dow AgroSciences LLC

9330 Zionsville Road Indianapolis, Indiana 46268-1054

LABORATORY STUDY ID

DRJ05142008Dow AgroSciences LLC Study ID: DRJ05142008 Page 2 of 2

Dow AgroSciences Response to EPA Query Regarding Two Toxicology Reports

SUMMARY

The Health Effects Division (HED) of EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs is currently reviewing two previously submitted toxicology re ports resulting from a study conducted with the insecticide chlorpyrifos, including Kisicki et al., 1999 (MRID 44811002) and Brzak, 2000 (MRID 45144101). Based on a query received fro m HED, Dow AgroSciences is providing additional details regarding conduc t and results of the study.

### Pgs. 3

- 20 Codes as “B”

– document may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), but access is restricted to entities not engaged in the production, sale or distribution of pesticides outside the United States.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Bruce Benn, Principal Executive Officer of Validian Corporation (the Company), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) on the date hereof, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April 15, 2009







/s/Bruce Benn

Bruce Benn

President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis W. Blazer, V.P.  Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dennis W. Blazer                                         
|Dennis W. Blazer                                             
|V.P.  Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
|November 13, 2007                                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CECO Environmental
Corp. and will be retained by CECO Environmental Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23210-CV-WILLIAMS

RMK MERRILL STEVENS LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ANTHONY MONACO, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s Report 

and Recommendation (DE 12) (“Report”) on the Motion for Default Judgment (DE 10) 

(“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff. No objections were filed to the Report, which recommends 

the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff’s Motion. (DE 12 at 1.) Upon a careful 

and independent review of the Report, the Motion, and the record, it is ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED that:

1. Judge Reid’s Report (DE 12) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED; 

2. Plaintiff’s Motion (DE 10) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and

3. Final default judgment will be separately entered in an order to follow. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 24th day of April, 

2023. 

Case 1:22-cv-23210-KMW Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2023 Page 1 of 1