alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Previous Change Logs

This table lists all changes made in previous revisions of this document. For the most 

recent changes, please see the Change Log in the front of the current NSCHC Manual. 

All page numbers are accurate at the time of the original revision. Some content may 

shift in future revisions.

# Date Section and Page # Change

1 4/16/21 Change Log (pg. 3) This change log was added.

2 4/16/21 Throughout Updated language to reflect branding guidelines

3 4/16/21 Throughout Updated and linked regulation references 

4 4/16/21 Individuals exempt from 

NSCHC (pg. 5)

• Clarified that staff under cost allocation plans are 

exempt from NSCHC, similar to grants with indirect 

cost rates

• Included language to clarify the requirements for 

AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers serving in the RSVP 

program and AmeriCorps members serving in the 

VISTA program

5 4/16/21 False statements under 

NSCHC (pg. 8)

Incorporated guidance from the “OGC statements on 

False Statements” document that was first published on 

4/30/15

6 4/16/21 NSCHC Timing (pg. 10) Clarified that NSCHC must be conducted, reviewed, 

and an eligibility determination made no later than the 

day before a person begins to work or serve on a 

NSCHC-required grant

7 4/16/21 Break in Service and 

Changing National Service 

Programs (pg. 11)

Clarified that break in service/work is 180 calendar days

8 4/16/21 NSCHC Documentation 

(pg. 11-13)

Clarified documentation requirements in process and 

practices and individual grant records

9 4/16/21 NSCHC Grant Cost (pg. 13) Clarified NSCHC grant costs

10 4/16/21 Enforcement (pg. 14-20) Included updated information from National Service 

Criminal History Check Guide to Enforcement Action 

Effective July 1, 2019 (there is no longer a separate 

enforcement guide)

11 4/29/31 Name-based Checks (pg.

10-11)

Provided guidance on what first and last name should 

be used on a name-based check

12 4/29/21 Changing National Service 

Programs (pg. 12)

Clarified what checks need to be reconducted when 

changing national service programs

13 4/29/21 NSCHC Documentation 

(pg. 12-13) and NSCHC 

Compliance (pg. 15)

Updated to reflect name-based check guidance, 

clarified documentation requirements in process and 

practices

14 4/29/21 Appendix B: Who is 

Required to Conduct 

NSCHC Graphic

Updated to include cost allocation plans

15 4/29/21 Appendix C: How to 

Conduct NSCHC graphic 

(pg. 26)

Removed to be a standalone document for easier 

viewing
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Donald G. Barnhart, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GoAmerica, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

----

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internalcontrol over financial reporting.

Date: March 28, 2008

|   | /s/ Donald G. BarnhartDonald G. BarnhartPrincipal Financial Officer |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7728
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95- 2459-L) Submitted: December 12, 1995 Decided: January 5, 1996 Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "'mandatory and jurisdictional.'" Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on September 5, 1995; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on October 13, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. Wetherefore deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Served: September 20, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------

GRAND CANYON AIRLINES, INC.

------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On September 1, 2010, Grand Canyon Airlines, Inc. d/b/a Grand Canyon Airlines d/b/a Scenic 

Airlines (“GCA”), a U.S. certificated air carrier,1 requested that the Department register the trade 

name “Grand Canyon Scenic Airlines” for use in certain of its air transportation operations.

Part 215 of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to use an 

alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states 

that the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly

named air carriers of the proposed use of the name. We have identified no other similarly named 

air carriers authorized to use the name “Grand Canyon Scenic Airlines.” Therefore no other 

notification is required. 

Since GCA has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of 

the trade name “Grand Canyon Scenic Airlines” by GCA for immediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C., .

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov.

 

1 See Order 2008-12-10, issued December 19, 2008.
Attachment A

SERVICE LIST FOR GRAND CANYON AIRLINES, INC.

MR ALAN R STEPHEN

VICE PRESIDENT FOR CORPORATE AFFAIRS

GRAND CANYON AIRLINES INC

1265 AIRPORT ROAD

BOULDER CITY NV 89005

MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MR JOHN WAUGH

PRINCIPLE OPERATIONS INSPECTOR

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

LAS VEGAS FSDO 19

7181 AMIGO STREET

LAS VEGAS NV 89119

MR PETER LYNCH AGC-300

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

MS ANNE SUISSA RTS-42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RITA/BTS E-34

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR BERNARD STANKUS 

OFFICE OF AIRLINE 

 INFORMATION

DOT/RITA/BTS RTS-42

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR CLAY MORITZ

OFFICE OF AIRLINE 

 INFORMATION

DOT/RITA/BTS RTS-42

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5111 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5111

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  treat certain property boundaries as the boundaries of the Lawrence 
      County Airport, Courtland, Alabama, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 2000

 Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  treat certain property boundaries as the boundaries of the Lawrence 
      County Airport, Courtland, Alabama, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAWRENCE COUNTY AIRPORT, COURTLAND, ALABAMA.

    (a) In General.--With respect to the airport located at Courtland, 
Lawrence County, Alabama (formerly known as the George C. Wallace 
Airport), the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 
shall treat as the boundaries of the airport property those boundaries 
shown on the airport layout drawing produced by Garver, Inc., dated 
March 8, 1999, and approved by the Jackson Airport District Office of 
the Administration.
    (b) Treatment of Nonairport Property.--The Administrator may not 
treat as airport property any real property not designated as airport 
property in the drawing referred to in subsection (a) regardless of 
whether such real property was designated as airport property at any 
time prior to March 8, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

IN ADMIRALTY 

CASE NO.: 22-cv-22887-KMW 

Peninsula Petroleum Limited, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Aum Scrap and Metals Waste Trading LLC, et 

al., 

 Defendant and Garnishee. 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Peninsula Petroleum Limited, pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41, dismisses this action without prejudice, each party to bear its own respective attorneys’ 

fees and costs. 

Dated: September 20, 2022. 

BLANCK & COOPER, P.A. 

 5730 S.W. 74th Street, Suite #700 

 Miami, Florida 33143 

 Phone: (305) 663-0177 

 Facsimile: (305) 663-0146 

 

BY:__ _//S// Jonathan S. Cooper, Esq. 

Jonathan S. Cooper, Esq. 

Florida Bar Number: 99376 

Email: jcooper@shiplawusa.com 

BY: //S// Robert W. Blanck, Esq. 

Robert W. Blanck, Esq. 

Florida Bar Number: 311367 

Email: rblanck@shiplawusa.com

/s/ J. Stephen Simms 

J. Stephen Simms (admitted pro hac vice) 

Simms Showers LLP 

201 International Circle, Suite 230 

Baltimore, Maryland 21030 

Telephone: (410) 783-5795 

Facsimile: (410) 510-1789 

jssimms@simmsshowers.com 

Counsel to Peninsula Petroleum Limited 

8032/NotDismissal 

Case 1:22-cv-22887-KMW Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Condensed  Consolidated  Balance Sheet and Condensed  Consolidated  Statement of
Operations  and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         549
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200
<INVENTORY>                                    8,669
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               18,614
<PP&E>                                         15,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,117
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 25,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,189
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,706
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,344)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,520
<SALES>                                        7,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,747
<CGS>                                          6,077
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,743
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (14)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (542)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 2,299
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,757
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .52
        

</TABLE>
#### § 761.2 Authority of Reserve Banks.

Each Reserve Bank is hereby authorized, in accordance with the provisions of this part, to (a) issue book-entry Postal Service securities by means of entries on its records which shall include the name of the depositor, the amount, the loan title (or series) and maturity date; (b) effect conversions between book-entry Postal Service securities and definitive Postal Service securities; (c) otherwise service and maintain book-entry Postal Service securities; and (d) issue a confirmation of transaction in the form of a written advice (serially numbered or otherwise) which specifies the amount and description of any securities; that is, loan title (or series) and maturity date, sold or transferred, and the date of the transaction.
§ 952.15 Change of place of hearings. ( a ) A party may file a request that a hearing be held to receive evidence in his or her behalf at a place other than that designated in § 952.14. The party shall support the request with a statement outlining: ( 1 ) The evidence to be offered in such place;
( 2 ) The names and addresses of the witnesses who will testify; and,
( 3 ) The reasons why such evidence cannot be produced at Arlington, VA.
( b ) The presiding officer shall give consideration to the convenience and necessity of the parties and witnesses and the relevance of the evidence to be offered.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.8



AMENDMENT TO 
THE SPROUT SOCIAL, INC. 
2016 STOCK PLAN
Sprout Social, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), by (i) duly adopted resolution of its Board of Directors pursuant to Section 14 of the Sprout Social, Inc. 2016 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) and (ii) duly adopted consent of the stockholders of the Company pursuant to Section 14 of the Plan, hereby amends the Plan pursuant to this Amendment to the Sprout Social, Inc. 2016 Stock Plan (this “Amendment”) as follows, effective December 11, 2018:
1.The first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“Subject to adjustments as provided in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be 5,467,862 and shall consist of authorized but unissued or reacquired shares of Stock or any combination thereof.”
2.    The first sentence of Section 5.3(a) of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“Subject to Section 4.1 and adjustment as provided in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options shall not exceed 5,467,862 shares (the “ISO Share Limit”).”
This Amendment, in conjunction with the Plan, constitutes the entire agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all oral and written agreements and understandings made and entered into prior to the date hereof.  In the event of any conflict between the terms and conditions of the Plan and the terms and conditions of this Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall prevail and control.  If any term or provision of this Amendment or the application thereof to any persons or circumstances shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Amendment or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Amendment shall be valid and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.
(signature page follows)






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the date first written above on behalf of the Company.
	
		
	SPROUT SOCIAL, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/Justyn Howard

	 
	Justyn Howard

	 
	President

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 






[Signature Page to Stock Plan Amendment]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,522,367
<SECURITIES>                                25,018,346
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,232,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                   416,994
<INVENTORY>                                 19,857,510
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            55,341,797
<PP&E>                                      25,505,467
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,864,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              77,060,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,062,750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,537,993
<OTHER-SE>                                  60,050,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                77,060,832
<SALES>                                     53,590,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            53,590,064
<CGS>                                       31,993,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,993,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,184,988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,349,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,465,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,884,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,884,575
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.46


</TABLE>
Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 33-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6417
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. THOMAS NEIL PICKETT, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:04-cr-00047-F-1; 7:06-cv-00143-F) Submitted: August 27, 2008 Decided: September 8, 2008 Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Neil Pickett, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Eric David Goulian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* Pickett’s motion for an enlargement of time to file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 or Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion, signed on December 28, 2007, did not toll the period to file a notice of appeal because a district court may not extend the time to file a Rule 59 or Rule 60 motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(2); Alston v. MCI Communications Corp. , 84 F.3d 705, 706 (4th Cir. 1996). 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Neil Pickett seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2006 & Supp. 2008). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “‘mandatory and jurisdictional.’” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quotingUnited States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on December 17, 2007. The notice of appeal was filed on March 19, 2008. * Because Pickett failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC. (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.                                      /s/ Philip L. Goulding  August 8, 2006 Philip L. Goulding   Principal Financial Officer