alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF BOULDER CREEK FINANCIAL,  INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE
RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
V

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5266

For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 2000

Mr. CANNON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SAEED

4 REZAI.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Saeed Rezai shall be eligible for issuance of an immi8 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful

12 permanent resident.
2

•HR 5266 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Saeed Rezai enters

2 the United States before the filing deadline specified in

3 subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered and

4 remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligi5 ble for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enact7 ment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Saeed Rezai, the Secretary of State shall instruct

16 the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current or

17 next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant

18 visas that are made available to natives of the country of

19 the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration

20 and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of

21 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the

22 country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such

23 Act.

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural
3

•HR 5266 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Saeed Rezai shall not, by

2 virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Æ
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5283

To amend the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention

Act to authorize the Federal Trade Commission to issue new rules

regulating telemarketing firms, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2000

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and

Abuse Prevention Act to authorize the Federal Trade

Commission to issue new rules regulating telemarketing

firms, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telemarketing Victims

5 Protection Act’’.
2

•HR 5283 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES.

2 Section 3(a) of the Telemarketing and Consumer

3 Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6102) is

4 amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(4) The Commission shall include in such

6 rules respecting other abusive telemarketing acts or

7 practices—

8 ‘‘(A) a requirement that telemarketers

9 shall notify consumers who are called that they

10 have the right to be placed on either the tele11 marketer’s do-not-call list or the appropriate

12 State do-not-call list; and

13 ‘‘(B) a requirement that telemarketers

14 shall obtain and reconcile with their own on a

15 regular basis the appropriate State list.’’.

16 SEC. 3. STUDY.

17 The Federal Trade Commission shall conduct a study

18 of the violations of the Telemarketing and Consumer

19 Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act by telemarketers espe20 cially of repeated violations by a single telemarketer and

21 of the provisions for penalizing telemarketers for such vio22 lations, including new provisions which would allow appro23 priate Federal action against telemarketers. The Commis24 sion shall complete the study within one year of the date
3

•HR 5283 IH

1 of enactment of this Act and report its findings to the

2 Congress.

Æ
#### § 6.2 Special meetings.

Consistent with the provisions of §§ 6.6 and 7.5 of these bylaws, the Chairman may call a special meeting of the Board at any place in the United States, with the earliest practicable notice to the other members of the Board and to the Secretary, specifying the time, date, place, and subject matter of the meeting. Consistent with the provisions of §§ 6.6 and 7.5 of these bylaws, by recorded vote a majority of the members of the Board may call a special meeting of the Board at any place in the United States, with the earliest practicable notice to the other members of the Board and to the Secretary, specifying the time, date, place and subject matter of the meeting.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 22, 2013

No. 04

- 13

- 00240

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.A.M.

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1995

- CI

- 13100

Honorable Jim Rausch , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the c ourt ’ s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR

LACK OF JURISDICTION.

We ORDER costs of the appeal taxed against appellant Linda E. Moreno.

It is so ORDERED on May 22, 2013

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of May, 2013

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Exhibit








SHUTTERSTOCK, INC.
Empire State Building
350 Fifth Avenue, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10118


Stan Pavlovsky
************ 
************




Re:     AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


Dear Stan:


This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement dated February 28, 2019 between you and Shutterstock, Inc. (the “Employment Agreement”) is entered into effective as of November 5, 2019 by and between you (referred to hereinafter as the “Executive” or “you”) and Shutterstock, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 


Capitalized terms utilized but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement. 


In consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, you and the Company hereby agree that the Employment Agreement shall be amended as hereafter provided: 


		
	1.
	Section 1(b) is amended and restated to read as follows: 




Position and Responsibilities. During the Employment Period, the Company agrees to employ Executive in the position of President and Chief Operating Officer. Executive will report to the Chief Executive Officer, or to such other person as the Company subsequently may determine (your “Supervisor”), and Executive will be working out of the Company’s office in New York City, New York. Executive will perform the duties and responsibilities and authority customarily performed and held by an employee in Executive’s position or as otherwise may be assigned or delegated to Executive by Executive’s Supervisor.


		
	2.
	Section 7(a)(iv) is amended and restated to read as follows: 




Equity. If the Executive’s termination date is at least twelve (12) months following the Effective Start Date, all of Executive’s unvested and outstanding equity awards that would have become vested had Executive remained in the employ of the Company for the twelve (12)-month period following Executive’s termination of employment shall immediately vest and become exercisable as of the date of Executive’s termination.


		
	3.
	Section 9(e)(i) is amended and restated to read as follows: 




A material reduction in Executive’s duties, authorities or responsibilities, relative to Executive’s duties, authorities or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to such reduction; provided, however, that not being named the President and/or Chief Operating Officer of the acquiring corporation following a Change in Control of the Company will not constitute Good Reason;


Except as amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and the valid and binding obligation of the parties thereto.  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, have caused this Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date written above.




SHUTTERSTOCK, INC. 


By: /s/ Lisa Nadler    
    
Name:    Lisa Nadler


Title: Chief Human Resources Officer




EXECUTIVE


/s/ Stan Pavlovsky            
Stan Pavlovsky
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walter S. Berman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Walter S. Berman
------------------------------------
Name:    Walter S. Berman
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    May 12, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under
that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Crim. No. 3119.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

July 21, 1938.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WILLIAM KAHN, Appellant.

Freedman, Christlieb & Alexander for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and R. S. McLaughlin, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

WOOD, J.

Defendant was accused by information of the crime of the violation of section 337a, subdivision 3, of the Penal Code, in that he unlawfully received money to be wagered upon a horse race. At a trial before the court without a jury defendant was found guilty and now prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction.

Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to justify the conviction. In their opening brief counsel for *646defendant fairly and frankly set forth the testimony given by the arresting officer in his direct examination: “Edward L. Newton testified as follows: That on or about the 11th day of January, 1938, he observed the defendant on a public sidewalk in the vicinity of 1650 No. Vine Street; that he commenced observing him at about five minutes of twelve and placed him under arrest about fifteen minutes after twelve; that the defendant was standing next to the curbing and different men would come up to the defendant and give him bills (paper money); that the defendant would then put the money in his pocket, make notations on a tablet he carried in his hand, disappear for two or three minutes and come back to the curb again. That he took from the defendant’s pocket a ‘National Scratch Sheet,’ which the defendant previously looked at once in a while; that while he (Newton) was standing alongside the defendant, one Ruby Goldie came up to the defendant and said to the defendant, ‘One dollar to win on horse 94, Bernard F,’. That on that date there was a purported horse race at Tropical Park, Florida, in which there was a purported horse named ‘Bernard F.' running; that the defendant put the dollar bill given to him by Goldie in his pocket; that the defendant made the notation ‘94’ and then ‘1’ under the first column of a tablet; that he placed the defendant under arrest and the following occurred: ‘A. I asked him who he was working for, and he said he wasn’t working for anyone; he wasn’t working for anyone right now. He was running his own book. I asked him why he had all that money on him. He said, well, he always kept enough on him to do his own paying off; and at the time of the arrest he had $355.00 on him.’ ” From the testimony just quoted it is manifest that the evidence is sufficient to justify the conviction.

Defendant contends that Officer Newton’s testimony concerning the conversation between defendant and Goldie, was erroneously received, arguing that the testimony is hearsay. There is no merit in this contention. The conversation took place at the scene of and at the time of the offense charged. It constituted a part of the transaction. (Sec. 1850, Code Civ. Proc.)

The judgment is affirmed.

Grail, P. J., and McComb, J., concurred.
§ 80.760 Horseshoe Point, FL to Rock Island, FL. ( a ) Except inside lines specifically described provided in this section, the 72 COLREGS shall apply on the bays, bayous, creeks, marinas, and rivers from Horseshoe Point to the Rock Islands.
( b ) A north-south line drawn through Steinhatchee River Light 21.
( c ) A line drawn from Fenholloway River Approach Light FR east across the entrance to Fenholloway River.
Exhibit 99.1



Certification of Periodic Financial Report by

Chief Executive Officer

Under Section 906
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Brian K. Hutchison, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (the Company), state and attest that, to the best of my knowledge:



| |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the Periodic Report) filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|/s/    BRIAN K.
HUTCHISON                       |  | Date: |  | March 18, 2003
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----- |  | --------------
|Brian K. Hutchison                              |  |       |  |               
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |  |       |  |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-23333-PCH

STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, a limited liability 

company,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address

104.12.65.64 an individual,

Defendant.

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, 

LLC hereby gives notice that its claims in this action against Defendant John Doe, subscriber 

assigned IP address 104.12.65.64, are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: December 22, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

 SMGQ LAW

 /s/ Rachel E. Walker__ 

 RACHEL E. WALKER (FL Bar No. 111802)

1200 Brickell Ave, Suite 950

 Miami, FL 33131

 Telephone: 305-377-1000

 Fax: 855-327-0391

 Primary Email: rwalker@smgqlaw.com 

 

MAMONE VILLALON

 By: /s/ Tyler A. Mamone

Case 1:22-cv-23333-PCH Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2022 Page 1 of 2
 Tyler A. Mamone, Esq.

 100 SE 2nd St. Suite 2000

 Miami, FL 33131 

 tyler@mvlawpllc.com

 Tel.: (786) 209-2379

 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-23333-PCH Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2022 Page 2 of 2
-cr-06240-WPD Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/20/2001 P
NUMBER 13-15-00458-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.B., A CHILD

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 279th District Court 

of Jefferson County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on January 13, 2016.

1

 On 

January 21, 2016, February 4, 2016, and March 10, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified 

appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to 

dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), 

unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably 

 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant 

to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 

(West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). 
2

explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's 

failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant. 

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a 

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

21st day of April, 2016.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walker C. Tompkins, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
-------------------------------
Name:   Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 14, 2002
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, K. S. Adams, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ K. S. Adams, Jr.


K. S. Adams, Jr.


Chief Executive Officer





Date: August 12, 2009
































This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.