WAST E ANALYSI S PLA N FO R TRAD E WAST E INCINERATIO NWAST E ANALYSI S PLA N OUTLIN E PAG E 1. 0 INTRODUCTIO N 3 2. 0 SAMPLIN G METHODOLOG Y 4 2. 1 Material s 5 2. 2 Type s o f

Containmen

t 5 2.2. 1 Container s an d Tank s 5 3. 0 ANALYTICA L RATIONALE 7 3. 1 Mandator

y Analyse s 7 3. 2 Non-hazardou s Wast e Analyse s 9 3. 3 Supplementa

l Analyse s 9 4. 0 PROFILIN G PROCEDURE S 1 3 4. 1 Procedural Requirement s 1 3 4.1. 1 Informatio n Provide d b y Generato

r 1 3 4.1. 2 Wast

e Managemen

t Decision 1 4 4.1. 3 Wast

e Re-evaluatio n * 1 5 4.1. 4 Exception s to th e Foregoing Requirement s 1 5 4.1. 5 Standard Profile s 1 7 4. 2 Decisio n Evaluatio n Logi c fo r Profilin g Procedure s 1 7 5. 0 INCOMIN G WAST E SHIPMEN T PROCEDURE S 2 1 5. 1 Receivin g Procedure s 2 2 5.1. 1 Exception s t o Incoming Wast e Analysi s Procedure s 2 3 5. 2 Incomin g Wast

e Shipmen

t Decision Evaluatio n Logi c 25 5.2. 1 Wast

e Identificatio n 25 5.2. 2 Th e Nee d Fo r

Additional Analysi s 25 5.2. 3 A n Evaluatio n o f Whethe r aWast e i s Foun d to b e i n Conformanc e o

r Non-conformanc e 26 5.2. 4 A n Evaluatio n o f Whethe r Waste s Foun d t

o b e i n Non-conformanc e ca

n be Accepted o

r wil l be Rejecte d 26

WAP- 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 46.

0 PROCES S OPERATION S PROCEDURE S 2 9 6. 1 Storag e 29 6.1. 1 Wast

e i n Container s 2 9 6.1. 2 Wast

e i n Tank s 2 9 6.1. 3 Bul k

Solid s Storag e 3 0 6. 2 Decantin g 3 0 6. 3 Incineratio n 3 0 6.3. 1 Pre-treatment

Analyse s 3 1 6.3. 2 Treatment

Residu e Evaluatio n 3 2 7. 0 QUALIT Y CONTRO L POLIC Y 3 4

ATTACHMENT S

APPENDI X WAP-A : ANALYTICA L PROCEDURE S APPENDI X WAP-B : AS H AN D DR Y SCRUBBE RSOLID S SAMPLIN G PROTOCO L APPENDI X WAP-C : WAST E ACCEPTABILIT Y CRITERI A APPENDI X WAP-D : DETERMINATIO N O FINCOMIN G WAST E CONFORMANCE/NON

CONFORMANC E APPENDD I WAP-E : CONTAINERIZE D WASTE : SPECIA L SAMPLIN G PROCEDUR E APPENDI X WAP-F : BIBLIOGRAPH Y O FSTANDAR D CHEMICA L REFERENC E MATERIAL S APPENDI X WAP-G : HM-18 1 COMPATIBILIT Y CLASSE S

WAP- 2 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4WAST E ANALYSI S PLA N

I n accordanc e with th e regulator y requirement

s se tfort h i n 4

0 CF R264.1

3 an d 3 5 IA C 724.113 , Chemical Wast

e Management

, Inc . (CWM

) ha s developed thi s Wast e Analysi s Pla n a

s a n integra l par to

f th e RCR A Par tB Permi tApplicatio n fo r it s Trad e Wast

e Incineratio n (TWI

) facilit y locate d i n Sauget(St . Clai r County) , Illinois . Th e procedure s se tforth i n thi s pla n ensur e tha tthi s facilit y wil l b e i n complianc e wit h al l requirement

s of 4 0 CF R264.1

3 and 3 5 IA C 724.113

. A cop y o f

thi s pla n wil l b e availabl e a tth e facility a

tal l times . 1. 0 INTRODUCTIO N Th e purpos e o f

thi s Wast

e Analysi s Pla n (WAP) i s t o describ e an d documen

t th e necessar

y sampling methodologies , analytica l technique s and overal l procedure s use d t o determine th e acceptabilit y an d managemen

t o f al l waste s whic h ente

r thi s facility fo r

treatmen

t or storage . Thes e procedure s shal l appl y t o al l hazardou s an d nonhazardou s waste s (hereafte r referre d to as "waste" ) receive d b y th e facility , excep

t sample s a s identifie dan d define d i n 4 0 CF R261.4(d) , (e) , an d (f) . Specifically , th e pla n delineate s th e following : Analytical Parameters , Rational e and Technique s t o identif y waste s o

r determine informatio n s o tha t treatmen

t and storag e technique s ca n b e utilized . Samplin g Methodology t

o ensur e that adequat e an drepresentativ e sample s ar e taken . Profilin g Procedure s t

o determine the acceptabilit y o f aparticula

r wast e strea mpursuant

to facilit y permit condition s an d operatin g capabilitie s prior t o acceptanc e o f

the wast e a t the facility . Incoming Wast

e Shipmen

t Procedure s to identif

y that th e delivere d wast

e conform s to th e accompanyin g manifest , profil e documents , an dthe condition s o f th e facility permit . Proces s Operation s Procedure s to maintai n saf e an d appropriat

e methods o

f storage , treatment , disposa l o r movemen

t of waste s withi n th e facility . Residue(s ) resultin g fromon-sit e treatmen

t of lan ddisposa

l restricte d waste s wil l b e evaluated , a

s needed , agains t

th e appropriat

e treatmen t

standar d o r prohibition . Qualit y Contro l Polic y the facility laborator y follow s to achieve hig

h qualit y analytical results . Th e form s show n withi n thi s WA P ar e typical form s currentl y use d by th e existin g facility . Thes e form s ma y requir e updatin g to equivalen t o r alternat e form s base

d upo n change s i n regulations , custome r needs , facilit y operations , o r

compan y policies . TW I wil l provid e notificatio n t o th e EEPA-DLP C Permi t Sectio n as require d b y 3 5 IA C 703.280 .

WAP- 3 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Fo r purpose s o

f implementatio n and performanc e of thi s WAP , "TWI Laboratory " mean s th e TW I laborator y o r any CW M laboratory , an y CW M subsidiar

y laboratory , o

r an y CW M designated contrac t laboratory , i n addition , th e us e o f TW I means CW M o

r WM X Technologies . Th e Laboratory , Technical , Operations , Environmental , an d General Manager s o r thei r designee s hereinafte r

ar e collectively referre d t o a s "Facilit y Management" , o

r individuall y referre d t

o a s th e Laboratory , Technical , Operations , Environmental , o r Genera l Manager . Al l waste s handle d b y thi s facilit y wil l be subjecte d t

o thes e procedures . Thi s i s t o hel p ensur e that thi s facilit y wil l b e i n compliance with applicable permit s and regulations . Th e compan

y strive s to maintain , a t al l times , complet

e complianc e with the hazardou s wast e regulations . Becaus e ne

w requirements , such a

s thos e promulgate d unde r th e lan d disposa

l restrictions , ofte n becom e effectiv e prio r

to th e time WA P revision s ca n b e formall y mad

e an d approve

d b y al l appropriat

e agencies , i t

i s impossibl e t o hav

e i n place an approved WA P meeting al l the condition s o f immediatel

y effectiv e regulator y requirements . I n ligh t of thes e facts , th e facilit

y wil l hav e i n plac e awritte n protoco l specifyin g the ne w requirement s suc h a s testin g an d frequenc y prio r t o receipt and/o r processing of

th e regulate d waste . Th e facility ma y als o periodicall y revis e th e protoco l t o reflec t scientifi c advance s o

r additiona

l regulator

y requirements . I f

WA P revision s ar e necessar

y becaus e o f

ane w regulator

y rule , they wil l b e submitte d withi n 6 0 day s afte r

th e effectiv e dat

e o f th e rule . 2. 0 SAMPLIN G METHODOLOG Y Samplin g i s performe d a

t the facilit

y to identif

y wast e shipment s an d b y the wast e generato

r to mak e th e initia l waste determinatio n a t their location . Specifi c sampling procedure s ar e dependen

t o n bot h th e natur e o f th e materia l an d th e typ e o f containment . A full-dept h representativ e sampl

e wil l b e obtaine d fro m each container

an d tank truc k unles s the physica

l propertie s (i.e. , heterogenou s debris , extremel y har d material , o r hig h shea

r force ) preclude obtaining afull-dept h representativ e sample . Exception s t o obtainin g full-depth sample s ar e note d i n Sectio n 2. 1 and d o not appl y t o froze n o

r chille dmaterial . Thi s sectio n present s sampling methodologie s t o be utilize don-sit e b y personnel i n accordance wit h 4 0 CF R264.13(c)(2) and/o

r 3 5 IA C 724.113(c)(2) . Wast e generators are referre d t o 4 0 CF R261 , Appendi x I and/or Appendi x A o f

3 5 IA C 72 1 fo r

samplin g procedures . I n th e cas e wher e the generato

r submit s asampl

e fo r initia l profil e approval , TW I require s the generato r to certif y that the sample submitte d i s representative . Th e samplin g equipmen

t and procedure s describe d i n thi s WA P represen t th e facility' s recommended samplin g protoco l fo r

genera l type s o f wast e materia l an d containment . Al l methodologie s wil l be update d an d revise d as th e reference s ar e update d and revised .

WAP- 4 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 42. 1 Material s

A t aminimum , th e methodologie s utilize dfo r specifi c material s correspond t o thos e reference d i n 4

0 CF R261 , Appendi x I and/or 3 5 IA C 721 , Appendi x A Th e sampling methods an d the equipmen t utilize dfo r thes e an d an

y differen t

material s ar

e presente d i n Tabl e 2-1 . Thi s tabl e i s asimplifie dsummar y o f dat a excerpte d fro m40 CF R261 , Appendi x I and/o r 3 5 IA C 721 , Appendi x A . Car e mus t be take n when collecting sample s t o ensur e tha t excessiv e los s o f volatil e organi

c compound

s doe s not occu r durin g sample handlin g an d storage . Sampl

e container s must

no t b e lef t opene d excep t when preparin g fo r

th e additio n o

r remova l of th e sample , and sampl

e jar s mus t

b e fille da s completel

y a s practicable . Certai n wast

e material s wil l requir

e deviation s fromth e thes e protocols . Whe n deviation s ar e necessar y t o sample material s whic h canno t b e sample

d usin g the recommended protoco l (fo r example , debris , extremel y hard materials , o r othe r hig h shea

r forc e materials) , th e facility wil l obtai n arepresentativ e sample , base d o n th e circumstance s preventin g avertical section , knowledg e of th e waste , and th e containe r siz e an d shape . Fo r

example , debri s an d lik e materia l wil l b e sample d wit h scissors , tongs , hamme r and/o r chisel . Adhesive s o

r other highl y elasti c substance s wil l be sample d wit h ascoo

p o r shove l an d scissor

s o r tongs . Resin s an d other

extremel y har d material s wil l b e sample d wit h ahamme

r an d achisel . (See Appendi x WAP-E) . 2. 2 Typ e o f

Containment I n additio n t o American Societ y fo r Testin g Material s (ASTM ) and othe r EPA-approve dsampling procedures , TW I has institute d specifi c methodologie s fo r ensurin g that

sample s take n fro mvariou s type s o f container s ar

e representative . Th e typ e o f containe r ma y b e transportabl e suc h as drums , portable transpor t unit s (e.g . small tanks , rol l of f boxes) , an

dtanker trucks ; o r stationar y (e.g. , tanks ) andin-proces s sources . Th e samplin g device s are selected , dependin g o n the siz e an d typ e o f containmen

t and o n th e specifi c material involved . Becaus e there i s amuch greate r tendenc y fo r heterogeneit

y i n avertica l plane rathe r than ahorizontal , samplin g wil l b e performe d t o addres s thi s concer

n (e.g. , full-dept

h vertical sample s wil l b e take n when possible) . Whe n sample s ar e collecte d whic h consist o f multipl e phases , analysi s wil l b e conducte d o n the sample as awhole . I n addition , acces s t o acontaine

r (i.e. , dru mbungs , tank

truc k domes , an d larg e tank s with samplin g ports ) wil l influenc e th e locatio n fro mwhich sample s can b e taken . 2.2. 1 Container s an d Tank s Samplin g o

f smal l container s (e.g. , drums , cartons , an d othe r small units ) varie s wit h the natur e o f th e wast e material . Fo r

flowabl e materials , th e samplin g device t o be use d i s either aColiwas auni t

o r tub e sample r t o dra w aful l vertica l axi s sampl e o f the flowable material (o

r othe r appropriat

e devic e a s liste d i n Tabl e 2-1) . Fo r

nonflowabl e wastes , atub e sample r o r atrie r i s use d to obtain asampl e (o r othe r appropriat

e devic e as liste d i n Tabl e 2-1) . WAP- 5 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/94Larg e container s an d tank s fo r flowable material s an

d bulk container s fo r

soli dmaterial s ma

y b e eithe r stationar y or mobile . Liquid s ar

e sample d wit h aColiwas ao

r tub e sample

r t o obtai n avertical sectio n (o r othe r appropriat

e device a s liste d i n Tabl e 2-1) . Light , dr y powder s and granule s ar

e sample d with atub e sample

r t o obtai n avertical cor

e (o r othe r appropriat

e device a s liste di n Tabl e 2-1) . Heavier solid s ar e sampled by trie r o r shovel , o r b y corin g wit h atub e sample r (o r othe r appropriat

e devic e a

s liste d i n Tabl e 2-1) . Stationar y tank s fo r blendin g o f

liquid s fo r

feedin g th e incinerator

ar e sample d wit h abaco

n bom b (o r othe r appropriat

e devic e as liste d i n Tabl e 2-1) . I n addition , tank s ma y be sample

d fro mtank

sampling port s o

r tap s throug h tan k inlet s o r outlets . TABL E 2- 1 SAMPLIN G METHOD S AN D EQUIPMEN T MATERIA L METHO D EQUIPMENT 0
Extremel y viscou s liqui d AST M D 140-70 ao r AST M E 300 a Tub e sampler d , thief , o r Coliwas a Crushe d o

r powdere d AST M D 346-75 ao r AST M E 300 a Tub e sampler d , trier , scoop , o r shovel Sof t AST M D 420-69 ao r AST M E 300 a Tub e sampler d , trier , auger , scoop , o

r shove l Soil-lik e materia l AST M D 1452-65 ao r AST M E 300 a Tub e sampler d , trier , auger , scoop , o

r shove l Fl y ash-lik

e materia l AST M D 2234-76 ao r AST M E 300 a Tub e sampler d , trier , auger , scoop , o

r shove l Containerize d liquid s SW-846 b o r

- AST M E 300 a Coliwasa/tub e sampler

d , weighte d bottle , bomb , o r tank sampling port s
American Societ

y fo r Testin g Materials , 1982 . Annual Boo k o f AST M Standards , Philadelphia , PA , o r mos t recent edition . 'Tes t Method s fo r

Evaluatin g Soli dWaste , Physical/Chemica l Methods" , SW-846 , Thir dEdition , Septembe r 198 6 a s amende

d by Updat

e I (Jul y 1992) , U.S . Environmental Protectio n Agency , Offic e o f Soli dWast

e (NTIS , 5285 Port

Roya l Road , Springfield , V A 22161 ) o r mor e recen t editio n o r revisio n (GPO , Supt . o f

Documents , Washington , D C 20402) . Th e specifi c equipmen

t i s dependen

t o n th e typ e of

container . See SW-84 6 fo r specifi c examples . See als o Sectio n 2.2 . Persona l Protectio n an d Safet y Trainin g Manual (Cincinnati , Ohio : U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Nationa l Trainin g an d Operationa l Technolog

y Center , 1981 ) pp . 3- 1 an d 3-4 , o r curren t revision . WAP- 6 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 43.

0 ANALYTICA L RATIONAL E I n accordance with 4

0 CF R264.13(b)(5 ) and/o r 3 5 IA C 724.113(b)(5) , apre-existin g wast e characterizatio n i s supplie d to TW I b y the wast

e generato

r o n th e Wast

e Profil e Shee

t (WPS , Figure 4-1) . Th e generator supplie s TW I with al l th e informatio n require d t o characterize , treat , stor e o r dispose o f

hi s waste , as define d i n 4

0 CF R264.13(a)(1 ) and/o r 3 5 IA C 724.113(a)(1) . [ref : 4 0 CF R264.13(a)(2

) commen

t and/o r 3 5 IA C 724.113(a)(2

) Boar dNote] . Se

e Sectio n 4. 1 fo r

adiscussion regardin g th e informatio n an d dat at o be supplie d b y th e generator . Th e analyse s i f necessary , are provide d b y th e generato r o r TWF s laborator

y t o evaluat e th e pre-existin g wast

e characterization s and to compl y wit h facility acceptance criteria . Analytica l method s ar

e classifie da

s Mandator

y Analyses , Blen dAnalyses , and Supplementa l Analyses . Thi s arrangemen

t allow s atiere d approac

h t o wast e identification , enablin g TW I t o structur e th e analyse s t

o adequately identif

y th e wast

e o r t o define operationa

l parameter s fo r

variou s treatmen

t processes . A t aminiTmim, al l incoming waste s ar e subjecte d to th e Mandator y Analyse s a

s a t first ste p i n th e analytical schem

e (excep t a s note d i n Sectio n 4.1.4) . Supplementa l Analyse s ar

e performe d as specifie di n Sectio n 3.3 . Th e Blen dAnalyse s ar e used t o determine the liqui dblen d characteristic s i n orde r to maintai n astead y state (normal

) operatio n of

the incinerator

(se e Sectio n 6.3) . Facility Managemen t wil l perform additional analyse s to augmen t th e mandator

y screenin g o

r t o provide operationa

l contro l a

s prescribe d i n Sectio n 3.3 , Supplementa l Analyses . The parameters whic h constitut e thes e categorie s ar

e describe d below . Th e method s t o b e utilize di n determinin g thes e parameter s are identifie di n Appendi x WAP- A (a s require d b y 4 0 CF R264.13(c)(1 ) and/o r 3 5 IA C 724.113(c)(1)) . Facility Managemen t ma y waiv e specifi c Mandator

y o r Supplemental Analyse s i f performin g the analysi s present s asafet y hazar d i n the laborator y as specifie di n Sectio n 4.1.4 . A summar

y o f th e analytica

l parameters withi n eac

h categor y an d thei r

usag e i s provide d herein . Analyse s are no t

repeate d fo r

sequentia

l activitie s o

r movemen

t o f th e sam e wast e withi n the facilit y unles s require d b y change s i n th e waste' s character . Se e Sectio n 6. 0 fo r

acomplet

e descriptio n o f

parameter s performe d i n conjunctio n with proces s operations . Th e result s of al l test s an d inspection s describe d belo w wil l b e maintaine d at

th e facility as par

t of it s operating record fo r

aminimumo f

thre e year s afte r

th e testin g ha s been performed . 3. 1 Mandatory Analyses Mandatory Analyse s ar

e basic fingerprinting procedure s (ke y parameters ) which ar

e use d to identif

y awast e an d t o ensur

e tha t th e appropriat

e wast e managemen

t techniqu e ca

n b e utilized . I n addition , they ai d i n liqui dblendin g decision s an d t o determin

e the prope

r soli dwast

e fee d sequence prior

to incineration . Mandator y Analyses : Provid e th e informatio n concernin g the wast

e whic h i s pertinent

t o th e saf

e storage , processin g an d incineratio n of

th e waste ;
WAP- 7 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Provid e Facilit y Managemen t wit h datawhich ca

n be use d t

o evaluat e th e consistenc

y o f informatio n provide db y th e generator . Incoming Mandator

y Analyse s are performe d o n the incoming wast

e shipmen

t sample s i n orde

r t o mak e th e fina l decisio n of

whether o r not th e facility ca

n manag e aparticula

r wast e strea mshipmen

t (excep t a s note d i n Sectio n 4.1.4) an d determine i f the wast e shipmen

t conform s to th e identit

y o f th e wast e a s identifie do n th e wast e shipmen

t manifest , an d to th e profil e information . Whe n necessar

y fo r profil e purposes , selec

t Mandator

y Analyse s ma

y als o be performe d o n agenerator supplie d sampl

e i f th e generato

r supplie d informatio n i s not sufficien t

(Se e Sectio n 4.1.1) . I f

a n incomin g wast

e conform s to th e informatio n provide di n the profile , the n th e informatio n gathere d ca n b e used t

o safely manag

e th e waste . I n accordanc e with 4

0 CF R264.13(c)(1 ) and/o r 3 5 IA C 724.113(c)(1) , th e parameters an d associate d rational e fo r

th e Mandator

y Analyse s ar

e a s follows : 1 . Physica l Descriptio n (appearance ) i s use d to determine th e genera l physica l propertie s o f th e wast e (color, physica

l state , layering , turbidity , viscosity) . Thi s facilitate s visual compariso n of

th e sample

d wast e wit h prio r wast e description s o

r samples . 2 . Heatin g Valu e (BTU ) i s used t o establis h the prope

r blen d characteristics , evaluat e it s suitabilit

y fo r incineratio n anddevelo

p appropriat

e packaging requirements . There are no minimu

mo r maximu macceptance limit s fo r

incoming wast

e shipments base d o n heatin g value . Heatin g value of aparticula

r blen d i s controlle dby th e incinerator fee d blen d (se

e Sectio n 6.3) . Thi s testin g does no t appl y to liqui ddecan

t drums whic h wil l b e blende d prio r

to incineration . 3 . Chlorin e Content

(CI ) i s used to establis h th e prope r blen d characteristics , appropriat e containe r packaging requirement s and/o r evaluat e potential impact s o n the incinerator and/or pollutio n contro l equipment . Thi s testin g does no t appl y to liqui ddecan

t drum s whic h wil l be blende d prio r to incineration . 4 . Radioactivit

y Screenin g i s performe d t o detect radioactiv e material s abov e background level s (greate

r tha n 0. 5 millirad s pe

r hour ) andto ensur

e tha t mixe dwaste , a

s define d i n th e TW I Par t

B RCR A Permi t

i s no t accepted b y th e facility . 5 . Flammabilit

y Potentia l Screening i s use d to indicat e th e fire-producing potentia l o f th e waste . Thi s testin g ca

n b e applie d to al l wastes , liquids , semi-solid s o r solids . Al l incoming liqui d material indicatin g apositiv e flammabilit y potentia

l wil l be store d a

s Clas s I flammabl e liquids , unles s closedcu

p flas h poin

t i s performe d showin

g aflas h point

o f greate r tha n 100°F . 6 . Wate r

Mi x Screenin g i s used t o determine whethe

r th e wast e has apotentia

l to vigorously reac t whe n mixe dwit

h water , t

o for mgases o

r othe r products , o

r whethe r i t generate s significant

heat . Thi s testin g doe

s no t appl y t o waste s tha

t are alread

y i n contac

t with exces s water . WAP- 8 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 47 . Cyanide s Screenin g indicate s whethe r th e wast e ha s th e potential to produc e hydroge n cyanid e upo n acidificatio n below p H 2.0 . It i s not require d i f

th e p H o f

th e wast e i s les s than o

r equa l t o 2.0 . 8 . Oxidize r

Screenin g i s used to indicat e the absence or

presenc e o f

stron g oxidizin g material . 9 . p H Screenin g i s undertake n t o indicat e th e p H and , i n general , th e corrosiv e natur e o f th e waste . Ful l range pape

r i s used fo r

th e initia l screenin g o f

wastes . Wast

e accepte d b y th e facility will , generally , be i n the rang e of 2. 0 t o 12. 5 p H units . liqui dwast e outsid e o f thi s rang e ma y b e analyze d fo r

alkalinity/acidity . Base d o n th e result s o r the chemica

l composition , th e appropriat

e proces s cod

e i s specified . I f

th e material exhibit s corrosiv e propertie s a s identifie di n technica

l literature vs . tan

k far mmaterial of

construction , corrosio n testin g ma y b e performe d to allow fo r storage , o

r i t wil l b e accepted a

s specialt y fee d material and injecte d directl y into th e incinerator withou t blending . 10 . Pain t

Filte r Tes t i s use d t o determine whethe

r fre e liquid s ar

e presen t i n awaste . I t

i s not performe d on fre e flowin g materials . 11 . Sulfid e Screenin g indicate s whethe r th e wast e ha s th e potentia

l to produc e hydroge

n sulfid e upo n acidificatio n below p H 2.0 . I t i s not require d i f

the p H of

th e wast e i s les s than o

r equa l t o 2.0 . 3. 2 Non-hazardou s Wast e Analyses Non-hazardou s waste s wil l b e sample d a s describe d i n Sectio n 5. 1 an d teste d fo r physica l description , radioactivit

y screening , flammability potentia l screening , wate

r mi x screening , an d p H screening (if liquid) . Non-hazardou s soli dwaste s wil l b e sampled and analyzed , as describe d above , fo r hea t conten t an d chlorin e content . Non-hazardou s liqui dwast e streams wil l be sampled an d analyzed , a s describe d above , fo r compatibilit

y testin g prio r

t o managemen

t i n bulk storag e tanks . I f

an y of thes e screen s are positiv e th e materia l wil l b e considere d discrepan t an d al l mandator

y analyse s completed (se

e Mandator

y Analysis , Sectio n 3.1) . 3. 3 Supplemental Analyses Supplementa

l Analyse s ar

e performe d t

o furthe r identif y waste s an d wil l b

e performe d whe

n neede d as directe d b y Facilit y Managemen t or a s specifie di n the followin g rationale . Supplementa

l Analyse s ar

e conducted whe

n th e Mandator

y Analyse s indicat

e that furthe r informatio n i s neede d to confir mth e wast e o r t o properly stor

e and/o r proces s th e waste . Th e analyse s ar e performe d as directe d b y Facilit y Management . Th e result s of thes e analyse s provide Facility Managemen t with anothe

r leve l of confidenc e concernin g th e prope r means of

storag e and/o

r processing . Som e o f thes e additiona

l analyse s utiliz e uniqu e procedure s an d protocol s formulate d b y TWI , whic h have been foun d t o be preferabl e fo r wast e identification . Thes e analyse s wil l mee t CW M performanc e standards . Other s ar

e standar d analytica

l technique s recognize d b y th e U.S . EP A andASTM . Th e parameter s

WAP- 9 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4whic h constitute th e Supplementa l Analyse s ar

e identifie dbelow , th e method s to b e utilize di n determinin g thes e parameter s are i n Appendi x WAP- A 1 . Containerize d Storag e Compatibilit y i s use d to ensur

e proper compatibilit

y withi n containerize d storag e buildings . Thi s testin g applie s onl y t o containerize d waste s whic h d o no t pas s the paint

filte r test . Th e testin g progra

mwil l no t appl y to smal l quantit y packaged chemicals , materia l repackaged o r solidified , o

r other materia l exempte d unde r 4.1. 4 an d 5.1.1 . I n th e even t tha t acompatibilit

y i s performe d o n material s whic h ar e indicate d a

s incompatible per

DO T HM181 , the compatibilit y tes t wil l take precedenc e ove r th e DO T hazar

d clas s grouping . 2 . Tank

Far mCompatibilit

y wil l be assesse

d b y performin g aliqui dwast e compatibilit

y o n th e liqui d wast e receive d fo r

bulk storage wit

h acomposit

e o f th e tank s an d storage containe r withi n th e containmen

t systemto whic h th e ne

w wast e wil l b e added . Containmen t are amaste

r composit e wil l b e mad e u p onc e pe r week . Th e incomin

g material wil l b e checke d agains t thi s maste

r composite . 3 . Ga s Chromatograph y Sca n i s use d to separat

e an d identif

y certai n organic compounds . 4 . Metal s (e.g. . As , Be , Cd , Cr , Ni , K , Na , T i Pb , Hg , Se) identifie s heav y metal s concentration s i n waste s to determine regulator y statu s o f th e waste . Inorgani c mercur y wast e as specifie di n 3 5 IA C 728 . Tabl e D , mercur

y hig h subcategor

y stream s wil l b

e analyze d t

o ensur e the mercur

y concentratio n i s les s tha n th e LD Rregulator y limit . 5 . Close d Cu p Flas h Poin t identifie s ignitabl e liqui dwaste s fo r storag e purposes . Thi s tes t wil l b e performe d when th e generato r has no t provide d analytica

l dat awit h th e WPS . Thi s tes t

wil l als o b e performe d to resolv e non-conformance issue s when ; a ) A n incomin g wast

e indicate s apositiv e flammabilit y potential ; an d b) Profil e informatio n indicate s tha t th e material shoul d no

t exhibi t aflammabilit

y potential ; an d c ) Th e discrepancy canno t b e resolve d throug h discussion s wit h th e generator . 6 . Acidity/Alkalinit y ma y b e performe d o

n liqui dinorgani c wast

e whic h exhibit s ap H greate r tha t 12. 5 o r les s tha n 2. 0 t o evaluat

e the processabilit

y o f thes e wastes . 7 . Apparen t

Viscosit y i s a n indicator

o f on e of th e fee d characteristic s to th e incinerator . I t i s determine d durin g profilin g on liquid s whe n th e Physical Descriptio n indicate s th e wast e i s viscou s o

r when analytical dat ai s not provide d b

y th e generato

r o n the WPS . 8 . Confinemen t

Tes t i s use d t o measur e th e magnitud

e an d rat e o

f hea t generation fro mamaterial subjecte d to aprogrammed temperatur e increas e unde

r confine dconditions . Thi s tes t wil l b e use d as a n indicato r

o f th e waste' s explosio

n potential . Fo r

material s fo r

whic h th e Facilit

y Managemen

t lack s explosivit

y information , eithe

r a s provide d b

y th e generator , throug h the facility' s previou s experience s with th e material , o r i n areview o f

standar d referenc e material s ( abibliograph y o f standar d reference s available t o the sit e i s include da

s Appendi x WAP-F ) an d Facility Management' s

WAP-1 0 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4evaluatio n o f the chemica

l structur e of th e compoun

d fail s to preclud

e a n explosion potentia

l fo r th e material , th e suspec

t materia l wil l be subjected t

o aConfinement

Test . 9 . Liqui dWaste Compatibilit y i s used t

o determine i f

wast e stream s ca

n b e blende d withou

t causing a releas e to th e environment . Thi s tes t wil l b e performe d on al l liqui dwaste s receive d fo r bulk storage , decan t to bul k storage , o

r blending prio r

to incineratio n with al l tank s withi n th e containmen t system to whic h th e ne

w wast e wil l be added . 10 . PCB s ar

e n mt o indicat e whethe r PCB s ar e presen t i n waste s an d to ascertai n their concentration . PC B analysi s wil l b e provide db y the generato r o r analysi s wil l be performe d prio r t o profil e decisio n approval . Incoming wast e shipments wil l b e subjecte d to PC B testin g base d o n the criteri adefine d i n CWM' s PC B Suspect Analysi s Policy . Material s containin g PCB s abov e 5 0 pp mwil l not

b e accepted . Organi c extraction s wil l no t be performe d o n oxidizin g waste s becaus e o f the safet y hazard involved . 11 . Chlorophenoxy Herbicide s b y HPL C i s use d t

o determine th e presenc e of dioxi n suspec

t compounds Silve x an d 2,4,5- T (se

e Appendix WAP-C ) a

t aleve l o f

0.01 % o r greate r subject to detectio n level/matri x interference . Suspect wast e stream s ar

e identifie db y th e TW I Dioxi n Suspect Analysi s Policy . 12 . Pheno l Screenin g i s use d t o determin

e th e presence o f

dioxi n suspect

compounds pentachloropheno l (se e Appendi x WAP-C ) a

t level s greate

r than 0.01 % o

r greater , subjec

t t o detectio n level/matri x interference . Suspect

wast e stream s ar

e identifie db y th e TW I Dioxi n Suspect Analysi s Policy . 13 . As h Conten t

i s use d to determin

e th e percen

t as h i n wast

e feed s t o th e secondar

y combustion chamber . Thi s tes t

i s performe d o

n liqui dblend s fo r

injectio n i n th e SC C burners . 14 . Fluorin e Content

i s use d t o determine th e percen

t fluorin e i n wast

e feed s t o th e secondar

y combustio n chamber . Thi s tes t

i s performe d o

n liqui dblend s fo r

injectio n i n th e SC C burners . 15 . Bromin e Content i s use d t

o determine the percen t bromine i n wast

e feed s t o th e secondar

y combustio n chamber . Thi s tes t i s performe d o n liqui dblend s fo r injectio n i n th e SC C burners . 16 . Specifi c Gravity/Densit y indicate s the densit

y of th e waste . Thi s informatio n i s used t o assur e that th e specifi c gravit

y o f bulk liquid s i s les s than th e desig n specifi c gravit y fo r th e storage tank s (1.5) .
Othe r parameter s no

t liste dher

e ma y be adde d a s require d b y change s i n regulations , compan y policy , etc . See Figur e 3. 1 fo r

asummar

y o f analytica l requirements .

WAP-1 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4

### FIGUR E 3-1 SUMMARY O F ANALYSI S INCOMIN G PARAMETE R PROFIL E WAST E Physios ! l^sripti m X p H Scree n X 

### % Oxidize r Scree n X B^l^activil y Stom a 

### % Flammabilit

y Potentia l Scree n X Water M » <%

) X Pain tFilte r Tes t X Wmt Val w 0Tm 

### XiM Chlorin e Conten t X(4 ) A^<totte** i 

## $m Specifi c Gravit

y S(6 ) 

## & G C Sca n (3

) S 8 Acidity/Alkalinity S Sulfid e $*

bb« & <1 > X Liqui d Wast

e Compatibilit

y 

### s $ Pentachloropheno l Screenin g (3 ) 

### s C^Jwrophea w HerWcfcte s 

### HPL C 0 ) 

# * Mercur y 

### s Fhiorm e 

### $ Bromin e 

### s Metal s 

### s Confinemen tTes t 

### s X = Mandatory Analysi s (1 ) Doe s no tappl y t

o wast e wit h p H <o r =

2 S = Supplemental Analysi s (2 ) Doe s notappl y t

o wast e already i n contac twit h excess water. (3 ) No tperforme d o n oxidizin g waste . (4 ) No tperforme d o n liqui d decan tdrums . (5 ) Liquid s only . (6 ) Bul k liquid s only .

WAP-1 2 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 44-

0 PROFILIN G PROCEDURE S TW I ha s develope

d aserie s o f

contro l procedure s to determine the acceptabilit y o f specifi c waste s fo r managemen

t a t th e facility . Th e profilin g procedur e dictate s wha

t informatio n apotentia

l custome r mus t provide t o enabl e TW I t

o carr y ou t it s responsibilit

y to obtai n informatio n necessar y t o manag e th e waste . I n accordance wit h 4

0 CF R264.13(b)(5 ) and/o r 3 5 HI . Adm . Cod

e 724.113(b)(5 ) thi s facility requires , a t a minimum , th e generator

t o suppl y al l the informatio n require d by 4 0 CF R264.13(a)(1 ) and/o r 3 5 D L Adm . Cod

e 724.113(a)(1 ) (se

e Sectio n 4. 1 fo r

adiscussion regardin g th e informatio n an d dat ato be supplie d b y th e generator ) necessar

y t o characterize , treat , stor e o r dispos e o f

eac h wast e stream . Profilin g i s the mechanismfo r deciding to rejec t

o r accep t aparticula

r type o f waste-prio r

to it s acceptanc e a

t th e facility-base do n the condition s necessar y to maintai n incinerator operation s a

t a(normal) stead y state , th e limitation s o

f existin g permits , an d it s compatibilit y with othe

r waste s bein g treated , store d o r dispose d a

t th e facility . Prio r to - accepting awast

e a t the TW I facility fo r

treatment , storag e or

disposal , adeterminatio n ha s previously bee n mad

e b y th e generato

r (an d reviewe d b y TWI ) tha

t th e wast e i s either : o acharacteristi c wast e a s define d i n subpar

t C o f 4 0 CF R26 1 and/o

r subpar t C , 3 5 Dl . Adm . Cod e 721 , o aliste dhazardou s wast e a s define d i n subpar

t D o f 4 0 CF R26 1 and/o

r subpar t B , 3 5 Dl . Adm . Cod

e 721 , o asoli dwast

e whic h i s not

ahazardou s wast

e as define d i n 4

0 CF R261.4(b) and/or

3 5 Dl . Adm . Cod

e 721.104(b) . Th e generator' s supplie d characterizatio n (Wast e Profil e Shee

t (WPS) , Figure 4- 1 i n Sectio n 4.1 ) provide s TW I wit h informatio n concerning th e distributio n o f wast e component

s a s wel l a s th e natur e o f

th e wast e components . 4. 1 Procedura l Requirement s Fo r eac h ne w wast e strea mtha t i s acandidat

e fo r deliver y to th e facility , excep

t fo r thos e specia

l material s note d belo w i n Sectio n 4.1.4 , the followin g procedure s ar e implemented : 4.1. 1 Informatio n Provide db y Generator Th e generato

r wil l provid

e TW I with : (1 ) chemica

l an dphysica l datarequeste d o n th e Wast e Profil e Shee

t (WPS) , typical for mshown as Figure 4-1 . Thi s informatio n wil l b e based o n th e following : o Analytical Data ; th e generato r mus t provide an

y available analytica

l datat o suppor

t the informatio n provide d o n th e WPS . A t aminimum , th

e generato

r mus t provide the following ; Flas h Poin t

(liquid s only) WAP-1 3 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4PC B Apparen t Viscosit y (liquid s only) p H Radioactivit

y Scree n Wher e the generato

r does not provide analytica

l data , fo r the abov e items , the dat a wil l be develope

d by TW I prio r

to wast e profil e approval . o Fo r

wast e cod e information , existin g o r publishe d dat

ao n the wast

e o r o n wast e generated fromsimila

r processes ; o Proces s and ingredien t information . (2 ) arepresentativ e sample ; i f require d ( arepresentativ e sampl e ma y no t b e require d b

y TW I i f Facility Managemen

t determine s tha

t th e profil e documentation supplie d by th e generator give s sufficient

informatio n t

o maintai n compliance with permi t an d operationa

l constraint s an dtha t submitta l o f asampl e woul dno t

ai d i n th e disposa

l decision process . Als o se e Section s 4.1. 4 an

d 4.1.5) . Non-hazardou s wast e profile s fo r

which the generator

ha s provide danalytica

l dat at o suppor t thi s determinatio n wil l no t requir e asample . (3 ) Certificatio n tha

t th e representativ e sampl e whe n require d fo r

approva l (se e above ) has been obtaine d usin g procedure s identifie di n 4 0 CF R261 , Appendi x I and/o r 3 5 HI . Adm . Cod

e 721 , Appendi x A o

r equivalen

t methods . (4 ) Lan dDisposa

l Restrictio n (LDR) Notification/Certificatio n Informatio n and/o r Dat a(4 0 CF R Par t 268) : (5 ) Materia l Safet

y Dat aSheets , wher

e available ; (6 ) Whil e no t

specifically required , generator s ar e encourage

d t o provid e othe r supportin g documentation , includin g additiona l analytica

l results , product

ingredients , etc . whic h wil l assis t i n the approva

l process . CW M maintain s a

s par t o f it s profilin g informatio n generator-supplied an d CWM-develope d information . Thi s informatio n ma y be accesse

d electronically o

r viahar d copy . 4.1. 2 Wast

e Managemen

t Decisio n Afte r evaluatin g the dat

asupplie d b y th e generator , Facility Managemen t wil l determin e th e acceptabilit

y o f th e wast e based on : (1 ) permi t

conditions ; (2

) the availabilit

y o f prope r wast e managemen

t technique s an d operationa l condition s necessar

y t o maintai n astead

y stat e (normal

) operatio n o f

th e incinerator ; an d (3 ) storag e andcompatibilit y concerns . Se

e Sectio n 4. 2 fo r

adetaile d discussio n o f

th e decisio n evaluatio n logi c fo r

profilin g procedures .

WAP-1 4 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 44.1. 3 Wast e Re-evaluatio n I n accordance wit h 4

0 CF R264.1 3 and/o

r 3 5 HI . Adm . Cod

e 724.113 , awast

e profil e re-evaluatio n wil l b e conducte d when on e o f the followin g occurs : o A generato

r notifie s TW I tha

t th e proces s generatin g the wast e ha s changed ; o Th e result s of

inspectio n o

r analysi s indicat

e tha t the wast e received a

t the facility doe s no t matc h th e identit

y o f the wast e designated o

n th e accompanyin

g manifes t

(o r shippin g paper

) o r profil e documentation (Se e Sectio n 5.2.3) ; or o Every fiv e years . A wast e profil e re-evaluatio n along wit h avigilan t incomin g loadscreenin g progra mi s sufficient

t o ensur e that waste s continue t o be properly manage d a t th e facility . Fo r bulle t item s on

e an d thre e above , thi s re-evaluatio n proces s consist s o f areview o f

th e paperwor

k to ascertai n tha

t th e analytica

l datai s accurat

e and current

an d tha t i t i s sufficien t

to properly manag

e th e wast

e a s intended . Th e procedur e typically involve s comparing th e current wast e profil e t o th e available result s o f routin e inspection , sampling , and analysi s obtaine d upon receip t o f a n incoming loa

d o f th e wast e stream . T o augmen t thi s review , i f

existin g analytica

l i s no t sufficient , th e generato

r ma y be aske d to review th e curren t wast e profile , t o supply ane w profile , and/o r t o submit asampl e fo r analysis , o

r TW I ma y obtain asample from ashipmen

t o f th e waste . 4.1. 4 Exception s t

o th e Foregoin g Requirement s Exception s t

o th e foregoing requirement s includ e the followin g specia

l material s a

s determine d b y Facilit y Management :

(1 ) Package d chemical s and debri s (e.g. , glassware , syringe , la b coats , etc.) , fromlaboratories , hospitals , household clea

n sweeps , manufacturin g facilities , etc. , includin g scintillatio n vial s packe d i n accordance wit

h Smal l Quantit

y Chemica

l Guideline s (SQCG's) . Scintillatio n vial s a s certifie d by th e generato r t o exhibi t

les s than 0.0

5 microcurie/gra

mradioactivit

y (scintillatio n vial s a

t thi s leve l ma

y exhibi t radioactivit

y abov e backgroun

d bu t les s tha n 0. 5 millirad s pe

r hour) . Fo r

packaged chemicals , th e generato r wil l suppl

y apackin g lis t (Inventory ) fo r

eac h containe

r (e.g. , drums ) specifyin g typ e and quantit y o f chemical s containe d within . Compliance wit h the SQCG' s and accuracy of the dru minventor

y provide d t o TW I fo r

review must

b e certifie d by th e technicia n packaging th

e wast e throug h completio n o

f th e druminventor

y sheet . Thi s dru minventor y shee t must be reviewe d an d approve d fo r

eac h containe

r b y th e TW I Facility Managemen t prio r to acceptance a

t th e facility . TW I wil l ope

n and inspec t

the content s o f

randoml y selected direc t

charge container s receive d fro meac

h packing organizatio n t

o verif y that the content s confor

mto th e dru m inventory . Drum s containing scintillatio n vial s wil l b e screened t o verif y tha t they are no t radioactiv e (a

s note d above) . See Sectio n 5.1.1(1 ) fo r acomplet

e descriptio n o f

Incomin g Wast e Shipmen

t procedure s fo r

small quantit

y chemica

l drums . Occasionally , TW I WAP-1 5 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4determine s tha t aparticula

r material i s no t

acceptable and so notifie s th e customer . I f th e custome r agree s wit

h TWF s determinatio n th e unacceptable materia l i s removed fro mth e container . Thes e drums wil l be tracke d on-sit e fo r the purpose s o f

determinin g wast

e storag e compatibilit

y b y manifest/profile/uniqu e dru midentificatio n combination . (2 ) Empty container s a s define d a

t 3 5 IA C 721.107(b) , (e.g . empt y fiber, stee l o

r plasti c drum s o r bags) . Thes e waste s wil l be visuall y inspecte d upo n receipt . I n additio n to difference s i n physica l appearance , thes e waste s wil l b e determine d to b

e nonconforming whe

n they contai n material i n quantitie s greate r than 3% of

th e tota l volum

e o f th e containe

r o r mor e tha n on e inc h o f residu e remain s on the botto mo f th e container . (3 ) Pharmaceutica

l and othe

r commercia

l product s package

d i n consume

r quantitie s i n thei r original untampered packaging . (4 ) Commercia

l product s o

r chemicals : off-specification , outdated , unuse d o f banned . Thes e material s must

b e receive d i n the origina

l containe r o r packaged a

s designated b y TWI . (5 ) Aeroso l cans an d Lecture Bottles . (6 ) Controlle d substance s define d i n 2 1 U.S.C . Sectio n 80 2 regulate d b y th e Federa l Governmen

t suc h a s cocain e an d othe

r drugs . Thes e ar

e typically generate d b y a pharmaceutica

l company , healt

h car e agencie s o

r stat e o r federa l agency . (7 ) Potentiall y Infectiou s Medical Wast e (PIMW) as define d b y IEPA . (8) Waste s which ar

e visually identifiabl e throug h a n inspectio n process . Example s o f thes e type s o f waste s are , batteries , cathod e ray tubes , crushe d glass , piping , filters an d filter cartridges , wire o

r tubing , pape

r products , syringes , meta l sheeting and parts , explosiv e component

s an d devises . Thi s lis t

i s not mean t to be al l inclusive , andma y be expanded wit h IEP A approval . (9) Prio r

Agency Approval : Material s whic h d o not fal l int o on

e o f th e othe r exemptio n categories , but

presen t impractica

l sampling o

r analysi s complications . Us e o f thi s exemptio n wil l be grante d o

n aprofil e specifi c basis , with initia l revie w by th e IEP A fieldoffic e (Collinsville) . Profil e approva l wil l b e subject

to IEPA-DLP C Permi t

Sectio n writte n (e.g . fax ) approval . Th e requirement

tha t agenerato

r provide arepresentativ e sampl e i s waived fo r

thes e material s becaus e the y exhibi t

unusua l o r impractica

l sampling an d analytica

l complication s and ar

e o f such anature tha

t thei r content s ar

e know n i n sufficient

and reliabl e chemica

l an d physica

l detai l tha

t sampling and analysi s i s no t warranted . Fo r

thes e exceptions , the generato r wil l suppl

y TW I with chemica

l an d physica l characteristi c informatio n necessar

y fo r prope r managemen

t o f th e wast e an d sampling i s no t

required . Th e abov

e waste s wil l b e describe d o n aWP S a s show n i n Figure 4- 1 an d accompanie d b y supportin g documentation (e.g. , dru m inventory , Materia l Safet y Dat aSheets (wher

e available) , an d othe

r dat amad

e available by th e generator) , includin g informatio n a

s t o whethe

r the wast e i s subjec t

t o th e Lan dDisposa

l Restriction s of

4 0 CF RPar t

268 . WAP-1 6 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 44.1. 5 Standar d Profile s Standar d Profile s ma

y b e use d fo r

wast e stream s whic h ar

e simila r i n physica

l and chemica

l characteristics , generate d b y simila r industrie s o

r processes , consisten

t wit h th e USEP A approac h of assignin g aliste d wast

e cod e t o simila

r proces s wastes . A n analytical databas e wil l b e develope d fo r aspecifi c Standard Profil e base d o n analytica

l dat afro m wast e stream s tha

t are representativ e o

f waste s fro msimila

r industries , processe s o

r historical data . CW M wil l revie w th e databas e an d determin

e whethe r th e individual wast

e stream s ar

e sufficientl y simila

r i n physica

l an d chemica

l characteristic s t

o a n establishe d Standar

d Profile . Th e analytica

l databas e develope

d a s discusse d abov e wil l replac e th e requiremen t fo r aprofilin g sampl

e (se e Sectio n 4.1.1 ) fo r

eac h individual wast

e stream . Specifi c candidat

e wast e stream s whic h ar

e identifie das conforming t o a n existin g IEP A approve d Standard Profil e wil l b e manage d unde r th e existin g disposa

l decision specifi c fo r

tha t Standard Profile . 4. 2 Decisio n Evaluatio n Logi c fo r Profilin g Procedure s Th e Facilit y Managemen

t i s responsible fo r

th e profil e evaluatio n decision (e.g. , whethe r t o approv e th e candidat

e wast e fo r acceptance) . The dataobtaine d fro mth e WP S (Figur e 4-1) , an y analysi s performe d b y th e CW M Laboratory , and an y othe r informatio n provide d b y th e generato r o r develope d durin g th e assessmen

t o f th e wast e i s evaluated b

y Facility Management . Th e facility Genera l Manage r wil l designat

e writte n authority fo r

profil e decision approva l t o qualifie d individual s based o n training , experience , an d supervise d decisio n reviews . Se e Figure 4- 2 fo r

require d wast

e managemen

t decision information . Facilit y Managemen

t wil l appl y technica

l experienc e an d judgemen t t o al l th e available informatio n i n orde r to reac h atechnica

l profil e approva

l decision . A t

aminimum , th e followin g criteri awil l b e assessed : o Managemen

t methods available ; o Condition s o

r limitation s o f

existin g permit s an d regulations ; o Capabilit

y t o manag e th e wast

e i n asaf e an d environmentally soun d manner ; o WP S descriptio n o f the proces s generatin g th e waste ; o WP S descriptio n o f th e chemica

l an d physica

l propertie s of

the waste ; o An y additiona

l documentation supplie d b y th e generator , includin g informatio n tha t th e wast e i s subjec

t t o aLan dDisposa

l Restrictio n of

4 0 CF RPart

268 ; o Result s of

Mandator

y Analyse s i f

applicabl e (se

e Sectio n 4.1.1) ; o Result s o f

Supplementa

l Analyses , a s required , o MSD S recommendation s (whe n available) . A summar

y o f particula r datawhich , when observe d on the WP S o r durin g th e Profilin g phase , wil l subject th e candidat

e wast e strea mto restrictions , specia

l packaging requirements , o r outrigh t rejectio n fro m furthe r consideratio n i s provided a s Appendi x WAP-C .

WAP-1 7 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4A wast e strea mwil l be rejecte d durin g th e profilin g phas e fo r the followin g reasons : o Incomplet

e o r outdated informatio n supplie d by th e wast e generato

r whic h canno

t b e supplemente d b y th

e generator , o WP S informatio n i s inconsisten t and th e discrepancy canno t b e resolve d wit h th e generator . Inconsisten

t informatio n i s that

whic h i s mutuall y exclusive base d on scientifi c fact s an d principle s (fo

r example , WP S indicate s tha t awast e containing 50

% aceton

e i s nonflammable) . o Sample analyse s an d WP S informatio n ar

e inconsisten

t and th e discrepancy canno

t b e resolve d wit

h th e generator , o Th e facility i s no t permitte d t o treat , store , or dispos e o f

th e particula

r wast e i n questio n (fo r example , th

e wast e i s radioactive) , o Th e facility doe s no t have th e capacit

y to treat , store , o

r dispose o f

th e wast e strea mi n question . o Facility experienc e wit h simila r material s o

r standar d referenc e material s (Se e Appendi x WAP-F ) indicate s tha

t thi s material canno

t safely b e incinerate d by limitin g siz e o f charge s or othe r processin

g controls . Se

e Appendi x WAP- C fo r

Wast e Acceptabilit

y Criteria . o Facility Managemen t i s not assure d o f

the abilit y o f th e facility t

o safely treat

an d stor e th e waste . Th e profil e evaluatio n i s conclude d with documentation o f

th e decision regardin g th e acceptabilit y o f th e wast e an d th e proposed metho d o f management, includin g such specia l packaging requirement s as ma y be require d o f

th e generator . Th e acceptabilit y decisio n i s embodie

d withi n th e wast

e managemen

t decision . A master Wast e Keceip t Analysi s Documen

t (WEAD ) (Se

e Figur e 5-1 ) wil l als o be prepare d b y completing thos e section s o f

th e for mwhic h require informatio n gathere d durin g th e profil e proces s (generato r name , profil e number , result s o f

profil e analyses , decision s restrictions , etc.) . A cop y o f thi s maste

r WRA D wil l b e mad

e a t th e tim e th e wast

e i s scheduled t

o transmi t

profil e informatio n t o operation s an d th e laborator y fo r th e Incomin g Wast

e Acceptanc e process .

WAP-1 8 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4FIGUR E 4- 1 GENERATOR' S WAST E MATERIA L PROFIL E SHEE T

WAP-1 9 EEVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Zaze ? rir.-e d Classica l W a s - « Managsmsn- , Inc . WAST E PROFIL E Profil e • Chec k her e i f thi s i s * Recertificatio n LOCATIO N O F ORIGINA

L

•GENERA L INFORMATIO

N

, ! : . Generato r Nana : Generato r USEP A ID : 2 - Generato r Address : Billin g Address : _ ( ) Sam

e

3 . Technica l Contact/Phone : . 4 . Alternat e " Billin g Contact/Phone : Contact/Phona :
PROPERTIE S AN

D COMPOSITIO

H 5 . Proces s Generatin g Waste : 6 . Wast e N

a 7A . I s thi s a USEP A hazardou a waat a (4 0 CF R Par t 261) ? Ye a (_ ) N o (_ ) B . Identif y

AL L USEP

A liste d an

d characteristi c wast a cod a nuabar s (D,F,K,P,U) : Stat e Waat a Codaa : 8 . Physica l Stat e 3 70F : A . Solid( J Liquid( J Both( J Gas(_ ) B . Singl e Laye r ( J Multilaye r ( J C . Fre e liq . rang a t o % 9A . pH : Rang a o r No t applicabl e (_ ) B . Stron g Odo r (_);describ e 10 . Liqui d Flas hPoint : < 73 F ( J 73-99 F (_ ) 100-139 F ( J 140-199 F (_ ) > - 200 F ( J N.A . ( J Close d Cup (_ ) Ope * Cup (_ ) 11 . CHEMICA

L COMPOSITION : Lis t AL L constituent s (incl . haloganata d organics ) presen t i n any concentratio n an d forwar d analysi s Constituent s Rang e Uni t Descriptio n *

TOTA L COMPOSITIO

N (MUS T EQUA

L O H EXCEE

D 100%) : 12 . OTHER : PCB s i f yes , concentratio n ppa , PCB s regulate d b y 4 0 CT * 76 1 (J . Pyrophori c ( J Explosiv e (_ ) Radioactiv e ( ) Benzen e i f "yes , concentratio n _^ ppa . Shoc k Sensitiv e (_ ) Oxidize r (_ ) carcinoge n ( j infectiou s ( j otha r Ai r Reactiv e ( ) Wate r Reactive~ ( )
13 . I f wast a subjec t t o th e lan d ba n ft neat a treataan t standards , chec k hara : _6 suppl y analytica l result s wher a applicable .
SHIPPIN

G INFORMATIO

N 14 . PACKAGING : Bul k Soli d (_ ) Bul k Liqui d (J Dru m ( J Typa/Siza : ; Otha r 15 . .ANTICIPATE

D ANNUA

L VWM s Unit s J Shippin g Frequency :
SAMPLIN

G INFORMATIO

N Sampl e Trackin g Number : 16a . Saapl a sourc e (drua , lagoon , pond , tank , vat , etc.) : ; Dat a Sampled : Sampler' s Name/Company : •16b . Generator* s Agen t Supervisin g Sampling : 17 . (_ ) B o saapla . require d (Se e instructions. )

GENERATOR' S CERTIFICATION I hereb y

certif y

tha t al l informatio n submitte d i n thi s an d al l attache d document s contain s tru e an d accurat e description s o f thi s wasta . An

y saapl a submitte d i s representativ e a a define d i n 4 0 CF R 26 1 - Append! * I o r b y usin g a n equivalen t method . Al l relevan t informatio n regardin g kno%# n o r suspecte d hazard s i n th a possessio n o f th a generato r ha s baa n disclosed . I authoriz e CW M t o obtai n a saapl a fro m an y waat a shipmen t fo r purpose s o f recartifIcation . Signatur e Mam a an d Titl e Dat eFIGUR E 4- 2 WAST E MANAGEMEN T DECISIO N

WAP-2 0 BEVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Dat e 9/29/9 4

Tim e 9»35x5 7 WAST E MANAGEMEN

T DECISIO

N Locatio n o f origina l Pag e . - i l

I . Generato r an d Facilit y Informatio n Decisio n Sit a Propoaa d Managemen t Facilit y Trackin g # i Priorit y i Profil e # i ^ Dat e Received ! Effectiv e Date s Generato r i ____ _ Waat e Categor y

Code s Descriptio n s

I I . Decisio n t o Den y Approva l fo r Managemen t o f Wast e
Reaso n fo r Denyin g Approva l

Initia l Approva l Nam e (print ) Dat e Fina l Approva l Nam e (print ) Dat e

b ) Precautio n Condition s o r Limitation s o n Approva l

(2 ) Contractin g Condition s

(3 ) Sit e an d Contractin g Condition s

c ) Analytica l Requirement s fo r Eac hLoa d

d ) Decisio n Expiratio n Dat e Initia l Approva l Nam e (print ) Dat e

IV . Fina l Decisio n
Stat e an y

Additiona l Precautions , Conditions , o r Limitation s

Fina l Approva l Nam e (print ) Dat e5.

0 INCOMIN G WAST E SHIPMEN T PROCEDURE S I n accordanc e with 264.13(c ) and/o r 3 5 HI . Adm . Cod

e 724.113(c) , eac

h shipmen

t o f waste , upo n arriva l a t th e facility , wil l b e inspecte d a s define d herei n befor

e th e initiatio n o

f an y furthe r activity . Thi s serve s tw o purposes . First , i t compare s th e actua

l wast e identit y wit h tha t determine d i n the profil e proces s an dtha t liste do n th e wast

e manifest . I f

the wast e conform s t o the expected description s an d propertie s a s determine d durin g th e profil e review , the n th e informatio n obtaine d durin g profilin g ca n reasonabl

y b e use d as th e basi s fo r

managin g the wast

e whic h arrive s a

t th e facility . Secondly , i t provide s asecon

d leve l o f assuranc e tha

t th e contemplated wast

e managemen

t techniqu e ca

n be utilized . Other

CW M personne l (o

r a CWM-approve dlaboratory ) ca n provid e th e Mandator

y and/o r Supplementa

l Analyse s require d prio r to o r concurrent

wit h th e arriva l of

the load . Wast

e shipments tha

t have arrive da

t th e facility ar

e considere d to b

e i n th e receivin g proces s unti l suc h time tha

t Facility Managemen

t make s afina l decision regardin g wast e acceptability ; a

t suc h tim e the waste s are considered accepted . I f th e wast e doe s no t confor mto th e expected description s an d propertie s as determine d durin g th e profil e revie w (i s foun d t

o b e nonconforming) , the n the informatio n obtaine d usin g th e Mandator y Analyse s an d an y Supplemental Analyse s performed , wil l b e utilize dto manag e th e waste . Al l wast e shipment s which are subject t o th e Lan dDisposa

l Eestriction s o

f 4 0 CF RPar t

26 8 an dhav e been treated , exempted , varianced , or mee t the appropriat

e treatmen

t standar d o r prohibitio n withou t treatment mus t b e accompanie

d by afor mfro mthe treate r or generator , certifyin g tha t th e treated , exempted , o r variance d wast

e meets th e appropriat

e treatmen

t standard , prohibition , or varianc e (o

r tha t th e untreate d wast e naturall y meet s the treatmen t standard o

r prohibition ) an d include s an y applicable analytica

l dat ao r referenc e to suc h dat ao

r documentation (i n accordance with 4 0 CF R268) . Furthermore , al l waste s whic h ar e subjec t to th e lan ddisposa

l restriction s an d require treatment mus t b e accompanie

d by afor mfromth e generator (o r treater ) tha

t (1 ) notifie s tha

t the wast

e contain s prohibite d constituents ; (2 ) identifie s th e appropriat

e treatmen t

standard s associated with th e material ; an d (3 ) include s an y applicable analytical dat a o r referenc e t o suc h data(i n accordance with 4 0 CF R268) . See Sectio n 4.1. 1 fo r adiscussio n regardin g th e informatio n an d dat at

o b e supplie d b y th e generator .

WAP-2 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 45. 1 Receivin g Procedure s Incomin g wast

e shipmen

t identificatio n begin s upo n arriva l o f th e wast e a t th e facility . Th e inspection , samplin g an d analysi s o f th e incoming wast

e wil l be performe d i n accordance with th e methods/parameter s describe d i n Section s 2. 0 and 3.0 .

I n th e cas e o f

containe r shipments no t

covered i n th e exceptions , eac h containe

r i n th e shipmen

t wil l hav e it s content s visuall y inspecte d b y obtainin g aful l dept h vertica l sampl

e to verif y that th e content s are similar prio r to compositing . Th e receivin g technicia n wil l not e physica l stat e fo r eac h dru mon th e receivin g document s (se

e Figur e 5-1 , Physical Descriptio n Worksheet) , whic h th e la b wil l compar

e t o th e profile dphysica

l descriptio n o f

th e waste . Incoming waste s wil l hav e it s ful l dept

h vertica l sampl

e visuall y inspecte d fo r

color an d phas e (liquid , solid , semi-solid) . Drum s o f package d chemical s wil l be randoml y opened and inspecte d t o verif y that th e dru mi s packe d a

s identifie di n Sectio n 5.1.1 . Upo n delivery , 1 0 percen t o f th e container s fro meac h wast e profil e withi n ashipment , wil l b e randoml y selecte d an d sampled , according to Sectio n 2.0 . I n th e even t tha t asingl e dru mo f

aspecifi c wast

e profil e i s received , tha

t dru mwil l b

e sampled . A mayimii mo f five containerize d shipmen t sample s fro mth e sam e wast e profil e ma

y b e composite

d prio r t o analysis , provide dth e individual sample s are simila r i n physica

l appearance .

Fo r wast e receiver s ove

r 80 drums , a

n additiona

l single dru mgra

b sampl e wil l b e take n as par

t o f th e incomin g analysis . Th e gra b sampl e wil l b e subject

to norma l receivin g piandator

y analysis . Thi s gra

b wil l b e compare d t o th e profil e data .

Wher e container s ar

e to b e randomly selected fo r

sampling o

r inspectio n (including packaged chemica l dru minspection) , th e container s t o b e evaluate d wil l b e selecte d usin g arandomnumbe r table , or arando m numbe r generator

on apersona

l compute r o r programmabl

e calculator . Dru mnumbers wil l b e assigned t o th e drum s i n ashipmen

t upo n off-loadin g prio r

t o inspectio n or

sampling . Th e randomnumber s wil l b e generate d t o establis h whic h container s wil l be evaluate d a t thi s time . ~

~ Container

sample s wil l b

e composited onl

y with sample s fromth e sam e profil e whic h are of

simila r colo r an d phase . I n addition , i f waste s fro mth e sam

e profil e exhibi t

difference s i n physica

l appearanc e durin g th e Mandator

y Analyse s an d thes e canno t b e resolved , (Se

e 5.2.4 ) the n al l remainin g container s wil l be sampled t o determin e whic h drum s are conforming , unles s adeterminatio n ca n b e mad e fromth e containe

r visua l inspection .

Sample s fromincoming wast e shipment s wil l b e subjecte d t o Mandator y Analyse s (se

e sectio n 3.0) . Al l suc h sample s wil l b e retaine d fo r aperio d require d to approve th e wast e fo r incineration . Th e result s o f

th e visua

l inspection s an d Mandator y Analyse s wil l be documented o n the wast e receip t analysi s documen

t (WEAD) , typical formattache d a s Figur e 5-1 . Thi s formi s use d t o documen

t th e profil e evaluatio n data , th e result s o f the Mandator

y Analyse s (se

e Sectio n 3.1) , and th e determinatio n o f conformance/non-conformanc e (se e Sectio n 5.2) .
WAP-2 2 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 45.1. 1 Exception s t o Incoming Wast

e Analysi s Procedure s Th e followin g materials , whic h ar e define d i n Sectio n 4.1.4 , wil l not b e sample

d upo n arriva l but , a

t aminimum , wil l b e subjecte d t o avisual inspectio n as described below . Thes e material s ar e no t sampled becaus e the y exhibi t

unusua l o r impractica

l sampling and analytica l complication s and becaus e sufficien t chemica l an d physica

l datahas previously been obtained : 1 ) Package d chemical s and debri s (se e Sectio n 4.1. 4 fo r

description) . Thi s inspectio n procedur e wil l appl y t o thos e drum s whic h ar

e selected fo r

verificatio n o f

th e druminventor

y sheets (DIS) . Durin g th e verification , thes e drum s wil l b e identifie das conforming , non-eonforming an d processable , o

r non-conforming an d discrepant . Th e definition s and response s wil l b e as follows : Conformin g Drums : A dru mtha t meet s guideline s an d al l material -i s identifie d an d correspond s with DIS . Conformin g drum s wil l b e processed . Processable Drums : A dru mtha t i s not conforming bu t

sufficien t

informatio n i s availabl e to determine it s acceptability . Th e followin g ar e example s o f

processabl

e drums : 1 . Missin g DI S but

DI S available i n approva l package ; 2 . Materia l identifie do n DI S but no t present i n th e drum ; 3 . Broke n bottle(s ) with legible labels(s) ; 4 . Broke n bottle(s ) an d label(s ) destroyed , bu t material identifiabl e wit h logica l deduction and DI S review ; 5 . Extr acontainer s o f identifie dmaterial ; 6 . Extr aidentifiabl e an d acceptabl e material ; 7 . Extr amaterial s consistin g o f PP E and jo b supplie s (e.g. , markers , absorben t bags , cardboard) ; 8 . Materia l on DI S presen t bu t quantitie s ar

e incorrectly identified ; 9 . Non-containerize d compoun d bu t identifiabl e fro mDIS ; 10 . Missin g labe l bu t

containe r type/siz e matc h DIS . Processabl e drum s wil l be accepted an d processed . Th e generato r o r packe r o f processable drum s wil l b e notifie d o f the inaccuracie s associated wit h th e processabl e drum . Th e generato r o r packe r wil l als o be notifie dtha

t th e continue d receip t

of processable material s versu s conforming , wil l no t b e tolerate d an d wil l resul t i n th e issuance o f

deterrent measures , u

p t o and includin g bannin g the generator/packe r fro msendin

g hazardou s wast

e to TW I fo r

treatment .

WAP-2 3 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Discrepan t Drums : A dru mwher e insufficient

informatio n i s available to determin e acceptabilit

y of the dru mo

r th e dru mcontain s unacceptable material . The followin g are example s o f

discrepan

t drums : 1 . On

e or mor e broke n bottle s wher

e th e content s canno

t b e determined ; 2 . Unidentifiabl e material ; 3 . Missin g labe l an d containe r doe s no t match anythin g on th

e DIS ; 4 . Unacceptable material i n drum ; 5 . DI S no t

available . Th e portio n of

the dru mwhic h i s discrepan t wil l be rejected . Al l no n direc t charg e drum s wil l be inspecte d durin g processing i n the Specialt y Processin g Building . 2) Empt

y container s a

s define d a

t 3 5 IA C 721.107(b) . Thes e waste s wil l b e visually inspecte d upo n receipt . I n additio n t o difference s i n physica l appearance , thes e waste s wil l be determine d t

o be nonconforming when they contain material i n quantitie s greate r than 3 % o f the tota l volum

e of th e containe

r or mor e tha n on e inc h o f residu e remain s o n th e botto m o f the containe

r o r when the shippin g containe r (overpack

) ha s fre e liquid s i n mor

e than th e abov e quantities . 3 ) Pharmaceutica

l and othe

r commercia

l products packaged i n consume r quantitie s i n thei r origina l untampered packaging . TW I wil l ope n andvisually inspec t

5 % o f the incomin g oute

r container s o

f thes e material s t o veril y tha t th e shipmen

t contain s consume

r packages . 4) Commercia

l product s o

r chemicals . TW I wil l ope

n 5 % bu t no t les s than on

e o f th e incomin g container s o

f eac h incoming profil e t o ensur e tha t th e material i s as described o n th e WPS . 5 ) Aeroso l cans an d Lectur e Bottles : Thes e waste s wil l be visuall y inspecte d upo n processin g into burnable charges . 6 ) Controlle dsubstance s define d i n 2 1 U.S.C . Sectio n 802 . Thes e type s o f material s wil l not b e opene d o r sampled b y TW I du

e t o the regulation s governing thes e materials . TW I wil l requir e a n inventor

y fro mth e packe

r o f thes e material s a

s specifie d i n th e procedure s outline d i n Sectio n 4.1.4 . Thes e material s ar e generate d b y apharmaceutica l compan y o r healt h car e agencie s or

stat e o r federal agency . 7) Potentiall y Infectiou s Medical Wast e (PIMW) a

s define d b y IEPA . 8 ) Waste s whic h ar e visually identifiabl e throug h an inspectio n process . Waste s i n original packaging wil l be subject t o 5 % inspectio n a s pe

r 5.1.1. 4 above . Waste s whic h ar e no t i n origina l packagin

g wil l be subject

t o 100 % visua l inspection . Example s o f thes e type s o

f waste s are , batteries , cathod e ra y tubes , crushe d glass , piping , filters an d filte r cartridges , wire o r tubing , pape

r products , syringes , meta

l sheeting an dparts , explosive components and devises . Thi s lis t

i s no t mean t t o b e al l inclusive , and ma y b e expande

d with local IEP A approval . WAP-2 4 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 49 ) Prio r

Agency Approval : Material s whic h d o not fal l int o on

e o f th e othe r exemption categories , bu

t presen t impractical sampling o

r analysi s complications . Us e o f thi s exemption wil l be grante d o n aprofil e specifi c basis , wit h initia l review b y the IEP A fieldoffic e (Collinsville) . Profil e approva l wil l be subject

t o IEPA-DLP C Permi t

Sectio n writte n (e.g . fax ) approval 5. 2 Incomin g Wast e ShipmentDecisio n Evaluatio n Logi c Afte r awast e ha s bee n receive d b

y th e facility , inspected , sampled , an d analyze d i n accordance with Section s 5.1 , 2.0 , an d 3.0 , Facility Managemen t wil l revie w th e profil e information , th e Mandator y Analyses , an d th e manifes t

to determin

e whethe r th e material receive d conforms with the profil e informatio n an d th e manifest , an d whethe

r i t ca n be safel y managed a

t th e facility . Th e major

function s i n th e proces s are as follows : 5.2. 1 Wast

e Identificatio n Facilit y Managemen

t wil l rel y o n on

e or mor e o f th e followin g source s o f

informatio n t o determin e th e identity o f

th e incoming material togethe r wit h an y othe r available information : o Visua l Inspectio n o f th e containe

r contents , o Sampling . o Result s o f

Mandator

y Analyses . o Appropriat

e Lan dDisposa

l Restrictio n Notification/Certificatio n Form , o Wast

e Manifest . Th e informatio n gathere d fromth e abov e source s wil l b

e compared wit

h informatio n take n fromth e followin g source s develope d durin g profilin g (se

e Sectio n 4.1) : o Wast

e Profil e Sheet , o Result s o f

an y analyses . o An y additiona

l documentatio n supplie d b y th e generator , suc h a s aMateria l Safety Dat a Sheet , produc t

ingredient , etc . Specifi c criteri afo r

wast e comparison ar

e show n o n th e WRA D (Figur

e 5-1) . Comparison s wil l b e documente d o n th e WRAD . Determinatio n o f conformanc e wit

h specifi c parameter s wil l b e determine d a s describe d i n Appendi x WAP-D . 5.2. 2 Th e Nee d fo r

Additional Analyse s Facilit y Managemen

t wil l performadditional analyse s accordin g t o the criteri ai n Sectio n 3. 3 whe n manifes t informatio n o

r result s o f

th e Mandator

y Analyse s d

o no t confor mo r ar e inconsisten

t wit h profil e informatio n (Le. , i f

awast e i s nonconformin g a s describe d i n Appendi x WAP- D o r informatio n gathere d i s mutuall y exclusiv e base

d o n scientifi c fact s an d principles) . WAP-2 5 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 45.2. 3 A n Evaluatio n o f Whethe r aWast e i s Foun d t

o be i n Conformanc e o

r Non-conformanc e Th e Facilit y Managemen

t mus t classif y th e wast

e a s bein g i n non-conformance i f i t i s significantl y differen t fro mth e informatio n show n i n th e profil e paperwor k o r o n th e manifest , o

r differ s i n quantit

y from tha t indicate d on th e manifest , i n accordance with 4 0 CF R264.7 2 and/o

r 3 5 HI . Adm . Cod

e 724.172 . Thre e majo r

criteri aar

e use d to arriv e a

t thi s decision . They are : o Fo r

bulk wastes , variation s greate r than 10 % i n volum

e or , o Fo r

batc h waste s (e.g. , drums , bags , etc.) , an y variatio n i n piec e coun

t (i.e. , th e numbe r o f piece s liste d o n th e manifes t o r dru minventor

y does no t agre e wit h th e numbe

r o f piece s received

) or , o I f inspectio n o

r analysi s o f

an y wast e determine s significan

t difference s exis t between th

e physica l propertie s o f

th e wast e an d th e description s o n th e profil e and/or shippin g paperwork . Significant difference s are : 1 ) Variation s fromconformanc e criteri aa s described i n Appendi x WAP- D or ; 2 ) Analytica

l result s whic h ar

e mutually exclusive base d o n scientifi c fact s an d principle s fro mth e wast

e descriptio n o n the manifes t o r profil e paperwork . 5.2. 4 A n Evaluatio n o f Whethe r Waste s Foun d to be i n Non-conformanc e ca n b e Accepte d o

r wil l b e Rejecte d I f th e informatio n collected i n (1 ) an d (2 ) abov e indicate s tha

t on e o r mor e o f the incoming wast

e evaluatio n criteri ai s significantly differen t fro mth e manifes t

o r profil e information , Facility Managemen t mus t undertak e to accoun

t fo r th e apparen

t observed difference . Thi s evaluation wil l include on e or mor e o f th e following : o Revie w o f samplin g method s to verif

y representativ e sampling ; o Supplementa

l Analysis , as specifie di n Sectio n 3.3 ; o Furthe r

evaluation o f

th e wast e profil e and incoming analytica l o r discussion s wit h th e generator . I f informatio n gathere d durin g thi s evaluatio n ca n resolv e the discrepancy , th e resolutio n o f th e discrepancy wil l b e documente d on the WRA D along wit h the result s o f the incoming wast

e analysis . I f discrepancie s i n incomin

g wast e evaluatio n criteri acanno t b e resolved , the wast

e wil l b e considere d non-conformin g an d th e result s documente d on th e WRA D along with the result s o f th e incomin g wast

e analyses . Waste s foun d t o b e i n non-conformanc e wil l eithe r b e rejecte d o

r re-profile dfo r

possible acceptance b y th e facility despit

e the variance . Waste s tha t

ar e rejecte d durin g unloadin g ma y be placed bac

k on th e truc k

fo r transportation , a s arrange d wit h th e generator . Waste s tha t ar e rejecte d afte r

th e transporte

r ha s departe d the facility ar e hel d
WAP-2 6 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4i n astorag e are aholdin g onl y compatibl

e materials , based o n the Mandator y Analyse s results . A record i s kep t o f th e locatio n o f

al l drum s on-sit

e a t al l times . Alternatively , TW I ma

y re-evaluat

e th e wast

e to determin

e whethe r the wast e materia l a s shippe d (i.e. , inconsistent

wit h WP S and/o

r manifes t data ) ca n be handle d a

t th e Facility . I f

the facilit y determine s tha t th e wast e ca n b e managed consisten

t wit h permi t requirements , the shipmen t wil l be managed . Th e profil e informatio n wil l be amended prio r t o acceptance o f

th e next shipment . Waste s to b

e re-profile dwil l be subject to th e profil e proces s requirement s a s se t fort h i n Sectio n 4.0 . I f th e re-evaluatio n procedur e indicate s tha

t th e wast e ca n b e accepte

d an d th e generator

concurs , arevise d wast

e managemen

t decision wil l b e prepare d b y Facilit y Management, i f

the metho d o f

managemen

t changes . I f

adiscrepancy canno

t be resolve d withi n 1 5 day s o f shipmen t receipt , the IEP A wil l b e notified , i n writing , of

th e discrepancy an d o

f attempt s to reconcil e it . Wast e wil l b e rejecte d fo r

th e followin g reasons : o Facilit y Managemen t fo r an y reaso n determine s tha t i t canno t manage th e material i n complianc e wit

h al l regulations , permi t

requirements , an

d standard s o f

healt h an d safety , o A manifes t

discrepanc

y (o r non-conformance

) canno t b e resolve d t o th e generator' s an d TWF s satisfactio n usin g the procedure s outline d above , o Th e generator's/transporter' s paperwor k i s no t i n orde r an dth e problem s cannot b e correcte d upon arrival , o Storag e spac

e i n containe

r storag e area s o

r i n on-sit e bul k liqui dstorag e tank s i s not availabl e to provid

e segregation of

incompatible materials , o A liqui dwast

e i s no t compatible (pe

r th e Liqui dWast

e Compatibilit

y Test ) wit h wast

e alread y i n storage and n

o segregation o

r othe r managemen

t metho d i s available . Rejecte d waste s wil l b e picked-u p b y th e generato

r o r b y apermitte d transporter t o b e returne d to th e generator' s facility o

r transporte d t

o a n alternat

e hazardou s wast

e treatment , storage , o r

disposa l facility .

WAP-2 7 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4FIGUR E 5-1 PHYSICA L DESCRIPTIO N WORKSHEE T

AN D WAST E RECEIP T ANALYSI S DOCUMEN T

WAP-2 8 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4

### T W I LABORATOR Y ANALYSI S REPOR T PROCES S COOE : ( ) PC B ANALYSI S REQUIRE D ( ) VERIF Y BURNABL

E CONTAINER S ( ) VISUA

L NSPECTIO N ONLY ( ) MERCUR Y ANALYSI S REQUIRE D ( ) DIOXiN PRECURSO RANAL . REQUIRED RECEIVE RNo . DRU M STORAG E COMPATAEMLrT Y MANIFES T No . ________ _ PROFILE D DO T HAZAR D CLASS : No . o f DRUMS : DATE : RESULTS : PASS : FAIL: . SAMPLE RSIGN : SAMPL E NUMBE

R PROFIL E CONFORM S DAT E ANALYS T Dru mNo . YE S N O No . of torn " : ."-..^::in::H : - • No . of torn u::: : _- 1 = :::H:HH:-H : - • Fre t Liqui d(% ) tH:s:::H:: H Pump* *iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii §18 8 Colo riiiiiiii:ir.!tiiiiiiiii ::S:::H:iH : Turtftft y Apparen t \Aecotty Physiu l Stat s S::=::n::n : WtfwRMCtMt y Rsdhtio n Screen Oridtan r Scree n - E - * - = - ~ Cyanid e Scree n :!::=::::::•: : SuNde Scree n = - Flem . Po t

Scm n p H SCTMf l SoecM c GreMfc

y Incidenta l Odo r Pain t Ffts r Tes t BTIVL B H Chlorin e •••iHHEjiiSnrrHH: : PCB-tQ C PCB' s Scree n Mercur y Fta**iPafe*CCFP

ACCEP T /

REJEC T ANALYTICA L COMMENTS :

PROFIL E REVIEWE D FO R APPENDI X \*JAP- C CONSTITUENT S BY : DATE : PROFIL E & HANOLIN G COMMENTS :

THKrafMrthMbmprap ^fortweadu ^ N o ta^gCTfcgc

n twinin g ntti*wU* v wnt*jk*PHYSICA L DESCRIPTIO N WORKSHEE T 

### RECEIVERt DAT E PBOFIL E I i O F CONTAINERS DRU M # SIZ E COLOR/DESCRIPTIO N %FUL L %S0 L %LI Q 1 2 3 4 5 • • 

### 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 26.

0 PROCES S OPERATION S PROCEDURE S Eac h movemen

t o f awast e withi n th e facility , durin g which an y chang e i n it s characteristic s ma y occur , make s i t

subject t o additiona

l inspection , sampling and analyse s t o determine appropriat e handlin g an d managemen

t o f the waste . Many o f

the analyse s needed fo r

the treatment , storage , and disposa l function s ar

e performe d durin g incoming wast e shipmen

t identification . Thes e ar e not repeate d unles s i t

i s know n o

r believe d tha

t th e wast e characteristic s have change d durin g storage . Existin g an d anticipate d operation s a t the facility , fo r

whic h current

and periodi c sampling an d analyse s i s important , includ e the following : Storage/Blendin g Decantin g Incineratio n Th e analytical procedure s fo r eac h o f thes e ar e describe d separatel

y below . 6. 1 Storage

Befor e an y waste s ar

e placed int o astorage unit , Facility Managemen t wil l asses s the compatibilit y o f th e wast e wit h th e storage uni t

material s of

constructio n an d wit

h waste s alread

y store d therein . 6.1. 1 Wast

e i n Container s Containerize d waste s ar e store d wit

h respect

to ignitibility , reactivit y an d compatibility . Compatibilit

y shal l b e determine d consisten t wit h DO T HM-18 1 guideline s as summarized i n th e "Segregation Tabl e fo r Hazardou s Materials " liste di n 4 9 CF R177.84 8 (se

e Appendi x WAP-G) . Base d o n the initia l DO T hazar d clas s determinatio n and analysi s o f the waste , the drummed wast e wil l be segregated according t o compatibility . Thes e material s wil l be separate d fro mincompatible material s b y storage i n segregated bay s withi n th e dru mstorag e buildings . Thi s i s accomplished b y th e datafro mth e WPS , Mandator y Analyses , an d Supplementar

y Analyse s requeste d b

y th e Facility Management . Compatibilit y segregation wil l no t

appl y t o materia l whic h hav e bee n repackaged , generated , o r solidifie da

t TWI . T o furthe r

verif y tha t waste s ar

e bein g properly categorized , TW I wil l institut e aprogra mo f Containerize d Storag e Compatibilit y Testing . Compatibilit

y wil l b e assessed b

y performin g aliqui dwast e compatibilit

y o n th e wast

e receive d fo r

containe r storag e a s outline d i n Appendi x WAP-A . Th e testin g progra m wil l no t apply t o smal l quantit

y package

d chemical s o

r othe r material exempted unde r 4.1. 4 an d 5.1.1 . I n th e even t tha t acompatibilit

y i s performe d o n material s whic h ar e indicate d a

s incompatible pe

r DOT , th e compatibilit

y tes t wil l tak e precedence ove

r the DO T segregation system . 6.1. 2 Wast

e i n Tank s Liqui dwaste s delivere d i n bul k form(e.g. , tank

trucks , railroa dtan k

cars) , o r pumped fro mdrums , are typicall y place d i n bul k storage tank s prio r

to incineration . Prio r

t o transferrin g an

y wast e into astorag e WAP-2 9 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4tank , th e compatibilit y o f th e wast e wit h the material alread y i n th e tank

andth e tan

k material s o f

constructio n wil l b e determine d by aliqui dwast e compatibilit

y tes t (se e Appendi x WAP-A) . I n addition , tank far m compatibilit

y wil l b e assessed b y performin g aliqui dwast e compatibilit

y tes t on the liqui dwast

e receive d fo r bul k storag e wit h arunnin g composit e o f th e tank s withi n th e containmen t syste mt o whic h th e new wast

e wil l b e added . 6.1. 3 Bul k

Solid s Storag e Bul k solid s wil l be manage

d a s follow s fo r

unloading int o th e bulk

solid s pits : 1 ) Only material whic h passe s th e paint filter tes t ca n b e place d into th e storag e pits . 2 ) Th e BT U an d chlorin e content s use d wil l b e either : (a ) Th e highe

r valu e o f the current pi t o r th e incoming material , o r (b ) Th e materia

l wil l be sampled afte r mixin g an d th e sampl

e wil l be analyze d fo r

BT U an d chlorine . 6. 2 Decantin g I n th e decantin g process , liqui dwaste s are decanted fromdrum s o r othe r smal l container s int o larger bul k storag e units . Th e applicabl e Mandator

y Analyse s wil l be performe d on waste s t o be decante d Prio r t o decanting , aLiqui dWast e Compatibilit

y Tes t an d specifi c gravit

y tes t on avolum

e weighte d sampl e wil l b e performe d to ensur e tha t waste s t o b

e bulke d togethe

r ar e compatible . A volum

e weighte d sampl e i s avolume proportionat e composit

e o f th e intende d decan

t liquids . 6. 3 Incineratio n I n th e incineratio n process , liquid , semi-soli d an d soli dwaste s ar e destroye d b y hig h temperatur e therma l oxidation . Th e resultin g stream s include combustion gase s tha t ar e scrubbe d t o remove H Q and particulates , an d othe

r treatmen

t residue s (Le. , ash , sla

g an d scrubbe

r sludge , scrubbe

r solid s (ba

g hous e dust

) tha t ar e furthe r

managed . Th e treatment

sampling/analysi s progra

mfo r incineratio n ma

y b e divide dint o tw o segments , eac h wit h aspecifi c purpose :

o Pre-treatment

analyse s confirmtha

t th e wast e fall s withi n th e facility permi t an d operatin g constraint s and allo w fine tunin g of th e proces s operationa

l constraints ; o Treatment

Residue Evaluation s confir msuccessfu l treatmen

t and that th e characteristic s of th e proces s effluen t

ar e such that

i t ca n b e sen t t o the nes t

ste p (discharge , disposal , o

r furthe r treatment

) based upo n permit

o r proces s constraints . Residue s fromon-sit e treatment

o f lan ddisposa

l restricte d waste s wil l b e analyze d and/o r evaluated , a

s needed , agains t th e appropriat

e treatment

standard s or

prohibitions . An y residue s o r waste s sen

t of f site fo r storage , furthe r

treatment , and/o

r disposa l wil l hav e appropriat

e notificatio n form s (i n accordance with 4 0 CF RPar t

268) . Th e applicatio n o f

thes e segment

s i s discussed below .

WAP-3 0 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Th e applicatio n of thes e segment

s i s discussed below . 6.3. 1 Pre-treatment

Analyse s Al l waste s fe dto th e incinerator ar e blende d t

o mee t permi t constraint s an

dt o maintai n stead

y stat e (normal) operatio n o f

th e incinerator . Liqui dwast e i s blende d i n bul k

tank s prior

to incineration . Pre

treatmen t

Analyse s (6.3. 1 numbers 1-6 ) ar e optiona l fo r liqui dwast

e i n tank s which wil l imderg o furthe r blendin g prio r

t o incineration . Prio r

t o incineration , asampl

e i s draw n fro mth e tan

k to b e fe dan d analyze d fo r th e followin g parameters : 1 . Heat

Valu e - Hea

t value i s measured t

o contro l th e fee d rate s o f wast e fe d int o the incinerators . Th e mayi'mn mhea t valu e which ca

n b e burne d pe

r hou r i s establishe d i n the operatin g permit . 2 . As h Conten

t - As h conten

t i s measured t

o contro l percen

t as h o f wast e fe d int o the secondar y chambe r wast e burner s o

f th e incinerators . Th e maximu mas h conten

t fo r wast e fe dinto th e secondar

y chambe r i s establishe d i n th e operating permit . Wher e th e permi t ha s not establishe d alimit , thi s analysi s wil l not b e performed . 3 . Tota l Chlorin e Conten t - Chlorin e conten

t i s measure d to contro l th e percen t chlorin e i n wast e fe d int o th e incinerators . The maximu mchlorin e conten

t fo r wast e fe d int o the incinerato r

i s establishe d i n th e operatin g permit . 4 . Fluorin e Conten

t i s measured an d use d i n conjunctio n with chlorin e an d bromine conten

t t o determin e th e haloge

n conten t i n wast e feed s t o th e secondar

y chambe r wast e burner s o f th e incinerators . The maximu mhaloge n conten t fo r wast e fe dint o th e secondar

y chambe r i s establishe d i n the operating permit . 5 . Bromin e Conten

t i s measured an d use d i n conjunctio n with chlorin e an d fluorine conten

t t o determin e the haloge

n conten t i n wast e feed s to th e secondar

y chambe r wast e burner s o f th e incinerators . The maximu mhaloge n conten t fo r wast e fe dint o th e secondar

y chambe r i s establishe d i n the operatin g permit . 6 . p H Scree n i s use d t o protec t th e integrit

y o f tan k far mmaterial s o

f constructio n an d provide managemen

t datafo r prope r blending . 7 . Specifi c Gravit

y - Thi s informatio n i s used to assur e tha t the specifi c gravit

y o f bul k o r decan t composit e liqui di s les s than th e design specifi c gravit y fo r the storag e tank s (s.g . = 1.5) . Th e permi t

operatin g value s wer

e establishe d throug h atria l burn . The permit operatin g value s ma

y b e changed i f

i t i s demonstrate d throug h atria l burn tha t th e ne w permi t guideline s allo w the incinerato r t o operat e withi n th

e permi t constrain t and a t astead y stat e (normal ) operation .
WAP-3 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Th e Facilit y Managemen t wil l review th e blend analyse s to assur e permit compliance an d to assur

e tha t th e blen d wil l allo w stead y stat e (normal ) operation o f

the incinerator . Th e blen d wil l b e readjuste d wheneve r necessar y t o mee t al l permi t

specifications . Thi s i s accomplished throug h tank-to-tan k blendin g with additiona l wastes . A Liqui dWast

e Compatibilit

y Tes t wil l b e performe d prio r

t o al l tank-to-tan

k transfer s o f liqui dwaste . Thi s new blen d i s the n teste d fo r th e blen d parameters , whic h ar e used to determine optimu m blen d characteristic s as mentione d i n the previou s paragraph .

Containerize d wast

e i s sequence

d fo r incineratio n throug h carefu l indexin g o f containe r feed . Th e parameter s necessar

y fo r selectio n o f

prope r fee d sequenc

e (Hea t Value , Chlorin e Content

) ar e evaluate d base d o n th e Mandator

y Analyses . Fo r

th e material s identifie di n Sectio n 5.1.1 , th e value s o f th e abov e parameter s ar e categorize d base d o n physica l an d chemica

l composition informatio n obtaine d pe r Sectio n 4. 1 an d 5.1 . Container fee d sequence s reflec t

an ongoin

g evaluation of

operating experience . 6.3. 2 Treatment

Residu e Evaluatio n Post-treatment

analyse s an devaluatio n wil l confir msuccessfu l treatment

an dthat the characteristic s o f th e proces s effluen t

ar e such tha

t i t ca n b e sen t to the next

ste p (discharge , disposa

l or furthe r treatment) base d on permi t

o r proces s constraints . I n accordance with 4 0 CF R268.7(b) , residue s (o r wastes ) resultin g fromon-sit

e treatment

o f lan ddisposa

l restricte d waste s are analyze d and/o r evaluated , as needed , agains t th e appropriat

e treatment

standar d (e.g. , Constituen

t Concentratio n i n Wast e Extrac t

(CCWE ) values ) or prohibition . Th e incineratio n proces s result s i n the generation of th e followin g residues : ash , slag andscrubber syste msolids . Eac h residu e has been thoroughl y evaluated t

o develo p asampling frequenc y that i s consisten

t an d independen

t o f th e origina

l waste s accepte

d fo r incineration . Waste s o

r treatmen

t residue s sen

t off-sit e fo r furthe r treatment

wil l be accompanie

d b y th e appropriat

e notificatio n (o

r certification ) forms . Incinerato r

as h an d sla

g generated i n the rotar y kil n an d dr

y scrubbe

r solid s generate d i n incineratio n unit s number s 2 , 3 o r 4 ar e sampled , analyze d an d evaluate d o n aregula

r basi s (Se e Appendi x WAP-B , Sectio n 2.2.1 ) i n accordance wit h analytica

l procedure s require d to analyz e agains t th e appropriat

e treatment

standard or

prohibitio n (Se

e Appendi x WAP-B) . Incinerato r

as h generate d i n the fixedheart h incineratio n unit s i s eithe r sampled , analyze d an d evaluate d o n aload-by-loa dbasi s o r i s retreate d an d subsequentl y evaluated . Th e Facility Managemen t wil l review th e analytica l result s an d determine th e dispositio n o f th e treatment

residue . I f

th e analytica

l result s mee

t th e appropriat

e treatment

standar d (e.g. , CCW E value) , th e treatment

residu e i s the n approved fo r shipment . Eac h shipmen t i s accompanie

d wit h th e followin g documentation : Wast

e Manifest ; Lan dDisposa

l Restrictio n Treatmen

t Certification ; Analytica l Repor

t o r referenc e t

o suc h analytica

l data .
WAP-3 2 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/94I n th e even t tha t th e analysi s doe s no

t mee t the appropriat

e treatment

standar d (Le. , CCW E values) , th e Facility Managemen t wil l investigat

e th e sampling procedur

e and th e analytica

l procedur

e t o ensur e no contamination . Tw o additiona l sample s wil l be submitte d fo r analysi s o f

th e parameter s whic h exceede d treatment standard s i n th e firs t

rotm d of analysis . I f

the secon

d analyse s pass , the residu e wil l b e approve d fo r disposal . I f

th e sourc e o f

th e contaminatio n ca

n b e determined , i t

wil l b e documented . However , i f th e second analyse s doe s no t mee t th e appropriat

e treatmen

t standar d (i.e. , CCW E values) , TW I wil l retrea t th e residue s i n orde

r t o mee t th e appropriat

e treatment

standar d (i.e. , CCW E values) . Alternatively , TW I ma y foreg o additiona

l samplin g and analysi s an d choose t o retrea t th e residu e whic h di d no t initiall y mee

t th e treatment standard .

WAP-3 3 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 47.

0 QUALIT Y CONTRO L POLIC Y TW I ha s developed aprogra mof qualit y contro l practice s an d procedure s to ensur e tha t precisio n an d accuracy ar

e maintaine d throughou

t al l o f it s laboratories . Al l site laboratorie s ar e require d to participat

e i n thi s program . Contrac t laboratorie s employed b y th e compan

y ar e subject to inspectio n an d audit

whil e performin g analysi s fo r

CWM . A revie w o f

th e contract

laborator y i s conducted to ensur

e tha t the qualit

y contro l of

CW M datai s maintained . Th e qualit

y contro l progra

mi s base d on "Handboo k fo r Analytical Qualit

y Contro l i n Wate

r and Wastewate

r Laboratories " EPA , Marc h 1979 . Goo dlaborator y practice s whic h encompas s sampling , sampl e handling , housekeeping an d safet y ar e maintaine d a

t al l laboratories . Th e followin g practice s mus t be implemente d a

t al l sit e laboratories : Al l instrumentatio n mus t b e evaluated through th e us e o f a n instrument

chec k standard . Divergenc e fromacceptable benchmar k criteri arequire s correction . Th e instrument chec k standar d result s ar

e recorded . Th e recor d ma y als o contai n evaluatio n parameters , benchmar k criteri aan d maintenanc e records . Eeagen t blank s ar

e typically prepare d with eac h batc h o f

sample s an d analyze d to ensur e sampl e contaminatio n has no t

occurred . I f

blan k analyse s d

o no t fal l withi n acceptable limits , modificatio n o f

reagent s or

modificatio n of

the analytica

l metho d i s implemented . A sampl e i s analyze d i n duplicat e typicall y fo r

eac h twent y sample s bein g analyze d fo r a particula r parameter . A blin dduplicat e sampl e wil l b e submitte d t

o th e laborator

y on a monthl y basis . Result s o f

thes e duplicat

e analyse s wil l b

e reviewe d fo r

consistency . A qualit y contro l solutio n or

sampl e material wil l be analyze d a t leas t onc e fo r eac h da y o r eac h batc h ru n t o sho

w that calibratio n an d standardizatio n o f instrumentatio n i s withi n acceptabl e limits . Thi s procedur

e inform s the laborator

y that prescribe d precisio n an d accurac y ar e bein g maintaine d Result s o f thes e analyse s are reporte d fo r review . Fortification s ar

e employed to monitor recoverie s an d maintai n extractio n and/o r concentratio n technique s a t acceptabl

e levels . Thi s procedur

e provide s informatio n abou t the effec t

o f th e sampl

e matri x on th e analyt

e i n question . Typically , arati o o f on e fortificatio n fo r

each twent

y sample s analyze d wil l be maintained . Usually , th e sam e sampl e use d fo r th e duplicat

e analysi s wil l b e fortified .

WAP-3 4 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Whe n available , referenc e material s fromthe Nationa l Institute of Standard s and Technology , o

r referenc e material s fro man y othe r recognize d source , wil l b e obtaine d an d analyze d according t

o norma l laborator

y methodolog

y t o indicat e accurac y o f th e methods . Thes e material s wil l b e analyze d a t leas t quarterly i f

the paramete

r has been performe d durin g that

quarter . Referenc e material s ar e no t require d fo r

screening methods . Al l CW M laboratorie s participat e i n "roun

d robin " sampl

e analyses . Thes e sample s wil l be submitte d b y th e QA/Q C Grou p an d wil l b e fo r the analysi s o f

norma l parameters . Result s mus t b e reporte d t

o th e group . Digression s fro mth e norm s establishe d by th e majorit y o f laboratorie s participatin g wil l b e investigate d and corrected . A t leas t on e sampl e pe r mont h i s sen t to aCW M designated laborator y o r adesignate d and approved contrac t

laborator y fo r paralle l analyses . Thes e spli t sample s o

r arepor t o f bot h result s are sen

t t o th e Qualit

y Contro l Uni t

when a n outsid e laborator

y i s employed . Sample s sen

t t o th e designated laborator y wil l be logge

d i n an d analyze d withou t analysts ' knowledg e of

site la b results .

- Th e facility report s th e followin g informatio n o n amonthly basis : o Numbe

r o f sample s analyze d o Numbe

r and result s o f

duplicate s o Numbe

r and result s o f

fortification s o Instrumen

t use d o Frequenc y o f

occurrenc e fo r

qualit y contro l chec

k sampl e withi n acceptabl

e limit s o Mean an d standar d deviatio n of

analyt e i n question . Th e facility als o report s intra-la b an d roun d robi n result s a s the y occu

r an d reference s material analysi s a

t leas t quarterly . A writte n cop

y o f an y thir d part

y contrac t

laboratory' s qualit

y contro l procedure s i s submitte d to CW M prio r

t o approva l A qualit

y assuranc e inspectio n i s conducted t o ensur e that prope r record s an d documents are presen

t an d maintained . Al l laboratorie s ar e subject to inspectio n an d audi t

o f al l procedure s whil e under

contrac t t o CWM . A revie w o

f th e contrac t

laborator y i s conducted to ensur

e that th e qualit

y contro l i s bein g maintained .

WAP-3 5 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4APPENDI X WAP- A ANALYTICA L PROCEDURE SAPPENDI X WAP- A ANALYTICA L PROCEDURE S Th e followin g analytica

l procedure s ar

e designe d t o identif y o r screen waste . The y ar

e use d b y CWM , base d upo n it s operating experience , a s rapi d bu

t effectiv e mean s fo r

establishin g ke y decision parameter s pertinen t t o prope r wast e management . Th e analyse s described i n th e section s belo w are based o n AST M and "Standar d Methods " approved b y EP A o r ar e base d on procedure s an d protoco l formulate d by CW M an d mee t CW M performanc e standards . Analytical procedure s not liste d below ma

y b e adde d as necessar

y with prio r IEP A approval .

I t shoul d b e note d tha

t th e informatio n presente d i n thi s appendix i s generic i n character . Therefore , certai n tes t

method s ar

e discussed whic h ma

y pertai n t

o treatmen

t o r disposa l processe s that

ar e exclude d from th e facilit y fo r

whic h the foregoin g wast e analysi s pla

n i s presented . I . UNIQU E ANALYTICA L PROCEDURE S Th e followin g analytica

l procedure s hav

e bee n foun d b y CW M t o provid

e importan

t quantitativ e informatio n pertinen t t o certai n processes . I n som e cases , thes e test s hav

e been developed by CW M t o provid e informatio n no t availabl e from"Standar

d Methods " i n Sectio n I I whic h follows . I n othe r cases , thes e test s ar

e substitute d fo r "Standar d Methods " wher

e they provid

e sufficient

equivalen

t information . Bench-Scal e Treatment

Evaluatio n - Sample s o f

waste s ar e combine

d with sample s o f

othe r waste s o r reagent s a t predetermine d ratios . Furthe r testin g ma

y b e require d i n orde

r t o confir mtha t th e desire d reactio n ha s occurred . Chlorophenoxy Herbicide s b y Hig h Performanc e Liqui dChromatograph y (HPLC ) - Thi s metho d (CW M 92-78 ) i s fo r th e analysi s o f

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic aci d(2,4-D) , 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic aci d(2,4,5-T) , and2,4,5

- trichlorophenoxypropioni c aci d(Silvex) i n liquid s an d solid s usin g HPLC/UV . The chlorophenox y acid s an d ester s ar e hydrolyze dto thei r respectiv e salt s b y heatin g and stirrin g th e sampl e wit h aqueou s alkal i Th e salt s are the n converte d t o thei r respectiv e acid s by the additio n o f HCL . The aqueou s solution s o f th e free acid s are the n analyze d usin g HPL C usin g ultraviole t detection . Dissolve dSulfide s - A n aliquo t o f wast e i s mixe dwith distille dwater . Th e solution/slurr y i s filtered throug h filte r pape r an d th e resultant

filtrate i s the n analyzed fo r sulfide . Saturate d antimon y potassiu

mtartrat e an d 1: 1 hydrochlori c aci dar

e added an d th e colo

r produced i s visually compared wit h standards .

WAP-A- 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Heat

Valu e b y Near

Infrare d Reflectanc e (NIR ) Spectroscop

y - Hea t o f combustion i s determine d b y Nea r Infrare d spectroscopy i n adiffus e reflectanc e mod e b y placing aproperly mixe dsampl e i n adiffus e reflectanc e cell . Th e instrumen t

produce s NI Rabsorbanc e spectru mwhic h ar

e converte d t o ahea

t of combustion valu e usin g apreviously define d calibratio n curve . Th e metho d firs t

screen s fo r

sample s t

o extrac t qualitativ e spectroscopic feature s fro mth e NI Rspectraan d the n produce s quantitativ e dat afo r hea t of combustio n usin g multivariate calibrations . Metal s Scree n b y X-Rav Fluorescenc e (XRF ) - Wast e sample s ma

y be prepared , i f

necessary , b y grindin g to a specifie dmes h size . Th

e prepare d sampl

e i s placed i n asampl

e holde r an d positione d fo r

reading . Instrument outpu t identifie s th e presenc e o f severa l metal s fo r

screening purposes . Semi-quantificatio n o f selecte d metal s i s the n possible relativ e t o matri x matched standards . Microwav e Aide dDigestio n - A portio n o f sampl e i s weighed into a n appropriat e microwave digestio n vesse l an d digeste d usin g amixture o f nitri c an d hydrochlori c acids . Th e vesse l i s heate d i n amicrowave ove n usin g programme d step s t o minimiz e the possibilit y o f venting . Afte r

cooling , th e content s ar

e dilute d to volume , filtered an d analyze d by th e appropriat e method . Organic s Scree n b y Immunoassa y - A portio n o f

th e wast e sampl e i s prepare d fo r

immunoassa

y screenin g (SW-84 6 4010

) b y usin g appropriat

e separation procedure s (e.g. , extraction , filtration, and/o r thi n laye

r chromatography) . Th e extrac t i s the n mixe dan d incubate d i n astep-wis e proces s inside antibody-coated tubes . Th e mechanic s o f

mixing , incubatin g an d measuring take s abou t 3 0 minute s an d result s i n acolo r change i n eac h tube . Th e colo

r developmen

t i s inversely proportiona l to th e concentratio n o f th e antibody-specifi c analyte(s ) of

interest , e.g. , herbicides , pentachlorophenol (PCP) , pesticides , polyaromati c hydrocarbon s (PAHs) , or tota l petroleu mhydrocarbon s (TPHs) . PC B Scree n b y Immunoassa y - A portio n o f

th e wast e sampl e i s prepare d fo r

immunoassa

y screenin g (CW M 93-8 1 an d 94-82

) b y performin g a

n extractio n wit

h methano l followe db y filtration. Th e sampl e extrac t i s the n mixe dan d incubate d i n astep-wis e proces s inside th e antibody-coated tubes . Th e mechanic s o f mixing , incubatin g an d measurin g take s abou t 30 minute s and result s i n acolo r chang e i n eac h tube . Th e colo

r developmen

t i s inversely proportiona l to th e concentratio n of

PCB s an d i s detecte d b y aphotometer . Percen t Acidit y - Result s ar

e reporte d a

s percen t of CaC0 3 equivalen

t o r th e particula

r specifi c specie s i f known . Percen t Alkalinit y - Result s are reporte d a s apercen t of th e specifi c alkalin e specie s (e.g. , CaOH , NaOH , etc.) .
WAP-A- 2 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Quic k

Leac h Extractio n Procedur e - A designated amoun

t o f sampl e i s mixe dwith the appropriat e extractio n flui dan d stirre d fo r

adesignated time period . Afte r filtration , th e p H and/o

r metal s conten

t ar e determine d usin g th e appropriat

e approved methods . Radioactivit

y Scree n - A sampl

e o f wast e material i s passed b

y ageige r counte r or surve y meter . Radioactivit

y level s abov

e backgroun d ar

e noted , recorde d and investigate d Solvent Scree n - Use s "standar

d methods " tailore d to th e compoun d clas s bein g analyzed . Tan k Far mCompatibilit

y - Assesse d b

y performin g aLiqui dWast e Compatibilit

y Tes t o n th e liqui dwast

e receive d fo r

bul k storag e wit

h acomposit

e sampl e o f th e tank s withi n th e containmen t systemt o whic h th e wast e wil l b e added . Containmen t are amaste

r composit

e wil l b e mad

e up onc e pe r week . Th e incoming materia l wil l b e checke d agains t thi s maste

r composite . Viscosit y - Th e viscosit

y o f th e materia

l i s visually evaluated usin g wate r as areferenc e fo r

lo w viscosity . Viscosit y i s reporte d as low , medium , hig h or non-flowable , etc . Containerize d Storag e Compatibilit y - Wil l be assesse

d b y performin g aLiqui dWast e Compatibilit

y Tes t on th e wast e receive d fo r

containe r storag e as follows : aTh e tes t

progra mapplie s onl

y to material tha

t fail s th e paint

filte r test . b . A maste

r composit e fo r eac h o f th e DO T hazard clas s categorie s wil l b e maintaine d a t th e site . c . Th e maste

r composit e wil l be mad

e u p initiall y by adding 10

0 mil . o f eac h receive r i n th e categor

y t o a n appropriately size d container . d . Whe n th e need fo r compatibilit

y verificatio n ha

s bee n determined , acompatibilit y tes t wil l b e performe d wit

h th e appropriat

e DO T hazard clas s category . e . Th e compatibilit

y tes t wil l b e performe d as follows : 1 . I n orde

r t o ensur e tha t th e maste

r composit e represent s th e actua

l plant-wide inventor

y i n each category , th e maste

r composit e wil l b e maintaine d i n a n appropriately size dcontainer . 2 . A 10

0 mi l sampl

e of th e incoming receive

r wil l be checked wit

h a10 0 mi l sample o f

the appropriat

e DO T hazard clas s maste r composit e usin g th e liqui dcompatibilit y test . 3 . I f th e receive

r passe s th e compatibilit

y test , the entire 20

0 mi l mixture i s added t o the maste r composite . Th e receive r i s the n approved t o b e store d withi n an y o f th e existin g bay s containing drum s o f tha t DO T hazar

d clas s category . 4 . I f th e receive

r fail s th e compatibilit

y test , th e sampl

e wil l no t b e added t o the maste r composite . 5 . Th e receive

r wil l b e re-teste d against

on e o f th e remainin g DO T hazar d clas s categories . WAP-A- 3 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 46 . I f th e receive

r i s no t compatible with an

y existin g DO T hazard clas s maste r composite , th e drum s wil l be segregated i n storag e unti l such tim e tha t they ca n b e moved directl y to a proces s are afo r

treatment . Th e testin g progra

mwil l not appl y to small quantit

y package d chemicals , material tha

t has bee n repackage d o r solidified , o

r othe r material exempted unde

r 4.1. 4 an d 5.1.1 . I n the even t tha t acompatibilit

y i s performe d o n material s whic h ar

e indicate d as incompatible pe r DO T hazard class , th e compatibilit y tes t wil l take precedenc e ove

r th e DO T hazard clas s system .
n . STANDAR D ANALYTICA L PROCEDURE S PARAMETE R METHO D REFERENC E Sampl e Wor

k U p Techniques : Inorgani c Technique s Aci ddigestio n procedur

e fo r flam e atomic absorptio n spectroscop

y Aci ddigestio n procedur

e fo r furnac e absorptio n spectroscop

y Aci d(Parr ) Bom

b digestio n Aci ddigestio n o f

oils , greases , o

r waxe s Dissolutio n procedur

e fo r oils , greases , o r waxe s Aci ddigestio n o f

sludge s Alkalin e digestio n (for

solids ) Organi c Technique s Separator y funne l liquid-liqui dextractio n Continuou s liquid-liqui dextractio n Acid-bas e clean-u

p extractio n Soxhle t extractio n Sonicatio n extractio n Alumin aColum

n Clean-u p an d Separatio n o f

Petroleu mWaste s Flurosi l Colum

n Clean-u p Silic aGe l Clean-u

p Sulfu r Clean-u p Inorgani c Analytica l Methods : Inductivel y Couple dPlasmaAtomi c Emissio n Spectroscopy (ICP ) Antimon y Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Arseni c Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Atomi c absorption , gaseou s hydride metho d 1-301 0 8-84-07 ; 1-302

0 8-91-61 ; 3-E886 ; E926 ; 6-Bulleti n 474 5 1-303 0 1-304 0 8-84-08 ; 1-305

0 1-306 0 8-84-22 ; 1-351 0 1-352 0 1-353 0 1-354 0 1-355 0 1-361 1 8-84-22 ; 1-362

0 1-363 0 8-84-22 ; 1-366

0

1-601 0 1-7040 ; 4-204. 1 1-7041 ; 4-204. 2 8-84-10 ; 1-7060 ; 4-206. 2 1-7061 ; 4-206. 3 WAP-A- 4 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4PARAMETE R METHO D REFERENC E

Bariu m Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Berylliu m Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Cadmiu m Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Calciu m Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Chromiu m Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Hexavalent

chromium : Co-precipitatio n Hexavalent

chromium : Colorimetri c Hexavalent

chromium : Chelation-extractio n Coppe r Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Iro n Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Phenanthrolin e metho d (ferrous ) Lea d Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Magnesiu m Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Manganes e Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Mercury (manua

l cold-vapo

r technique ) I n liqui dwast

e I n soli do r semi-solidwast

e Nicke l Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Seleniu m Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d Atomi c absorption , gaseou s hydride metho d Silve r Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d 1-7080 ; 4-208. 1 1-7081 ; 4-208. 2 1-7090 ; 4-210. 1 1-7091 ; 4-210. 2 1-7130 ; 4-213. 1 1-7131 ; 4-213. 2 1-7140 ; 4-215. 1 4-215. 2 1-7190 ; 4-218. 1 1-7191 ; 4-218. 2 1-719 5 1-7196 ; 2-3500Cr

D 1-7197 ; 4-218. 4 1-7210 ; 4-220. 1 4-220. 2 1-7380 ; 4-236. 1 4-236. 2 2-3500Fe D 1-7420 ; 4-239. 1 1-7421 ; 4-239. 2 1-7450 ; 4-242. 1 1-7460 ; 4-243. 1 4-243. 2 8-84-12 ; 1-747

0 8-84-05 ; 8-84-12 ; 1-747 1 1-7520 ; 4-249. 1 1-7521 ; 4-249. 2 8-84-13 ; 1-7740 ; 4-270. 2 1-7741 ; 4-270. 3 1-7760 ; 4-272. 1 1-7761 ; 4-272. 2

WAP-A- 5 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4PARAMETE R METHO D REFERENC E

Thalliu m Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d 1-7840 ; 4-279. 1 Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d 1-7841 ; 4-279. 2 Zinc Atomi c absorption , direc t aspiratio n metho d 1-7950 ; 4-289. 1 Atomi c absorption , furnac e metho d 4-289. 2 Organi c Analytica l Methods : Gas Chromatographi c Method s Halogenate d Volatil e Organic s 1-801 0 Non-halogenate d Volatil e Organic s 1-801 5 Aromati c Volatil e Organic s 1-802 0 Acrolein , Acrylonitrile , Acetonitril e 1-8030 Phenol s 1-804 0 Phthalat e Ester s 1-806 0 Organochlorin e Pesticide s an d PCB s 8-84-22 ; 1-808 0 Nitroaromatic s an d Cycli c Ketone s 1-809 0 Polynuclea

r Aromati c Hydrocarbon s 1-810 0 Chlorinate dHydrocarbon s 1-812 0 Organophosphat

e Pesticide s 1-814 0 Chlorinate dHerbicide s 1-815 0 G C Scan s 8-86-02 ; 3-E260 Gas Chromatographic/Mas s Spectroscop y Method s GC/M S Metho dfo r

Dioxi n 1-8280, 8290 GC/M S Metho dfo r

Volatil e Organic s 1-8240 ; 7-62 4 GC/M S Metho dfo r

Semi-Volatil e Organic s 1-8250 ; 8270 ; 7-62 5 Infrare d Spectroscop y Method s 3-D2621 , D4053 ; 5

- creenin g Methods : Physical Descriptio n 3-D497 9 Flammabilit

y Potentia l Screen 3-D498 2 Water Compatibilit

y 3-D5058 C p H Scree n 3-D4980 Sulfid e Scree n 3-D497 8 Cyanid e Scree n 3-D504 9 CommingledWast e Compatibilit y 3-D5058 A Polymerizatio n Potentia l 3-D5058 B Oxidizer Scree n 3-D498 1 Pain t Filte r Tes t 1-909 5 Bul k Densit y an d Apparen

t Specifi c Gravit

y Screen 3-D505 7

WAP-A- 6 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4PARAMETE RMETHO D REFERENC E

Miscellaneou s Analytica l Methods : Acidity Alkalinit y Ammoni a Anion s b y Io n Chromatograph

y As h Conten

t Bromide s Chloride s Conductivity/Conductanc e Extractio n Procedure Flas h poin

t Pensky-Marten s closed-cu p metho d Setaflas h closed-cu

p metho d Clevelan dopen-cu

p Fluorid e Fre e Cyanide s Haloge n Content Hea t Valu e Oi l an d Greas e Oxidation-Reductio n (Redox ) Potential (ORP ) Petroleu mHydrocarbons , Tota l Recoverable Phenol s p H Measuremen

t Phosphate s Radioactivit

y Scree n Solid s Tota l (TS ) a

t 103-105° C Dissolve d(TDS ) at

180° C Suspended , Tota l (TSS ) a t 103-105° C Fixe dan d Volatil e a

t 500° C Specifi c Gravit y Sulfate s Sulfu r Tota l and Amenabl e Cyanide s Tota l Chlorin e Content Tota l Organi c Carbo n Tota l Sulfide s Toxicit y Characteristi c Leachin g Procedur e (TCLP ) Viscosit y Water Content 8-91-68 ; 2-231 0 2-232 0 4-350. 3 8-87-40 ; 3-D4327 ; 4-300. 0 8-91-69 ; 3-D482 , D317 4 2-4500Br' ; 4-300.0 , 320. 1 2-4500C1" ; 4-300.0 , 325. 3 3-D1125 ; 4-120. 1

1-131 0 8-84-19 ; 1-1010 ; 3-D9 3 1

- 1020 ; 3-D327 8

3-D9 2 2-4500F" ; 4-300.0 , 340.2 , 340. 3

2

- 4500CN"H, I 3-D808 , D2361 , D4327 8-87-37 ; 3-D240 , D201 5 2-5520 ; 4-413.1 , 413. 2

3-D149 8 2

- 5520F ; 4-418. 1 2-5530 , 6420 ; 4-420. 1 1-9040, 9041 , 9045 ; 2-4500H + ; 3-E70 ; 4-150. 1

2-4500P ; 4-300.0 , 365.1-4

8-87-3 6 2-2540B ; 4-160. 3 2-2540C ; 4-160. 1 2-2540D ; 4-160. 2 2-2540E , 2540G ; 4-160. 4 2-2710F ; 3-D70 , D891 , D1217 , D1429 2-4500SO 4 2 " ; 4-300.0 , 375. 3 8-87-40 ; 3-D129 , D3177 , D432 7 1-9010A ; 2-4500CN"C,G ; 4-335. 1

3

- D808 , D4327 2-5310 ; 3-D257 9 1-9030 ; 2-4500S 2 "

1-131 1 8-86-35 ; 3-D88 , D446 , D298 3 3-D95 , D3173 , E20 3

WAP-A- 7 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Th e above-reference dprocedure s ar e describe di n the followin g publications . Th e firs t digit of th e referenc e number s abov

e ar e keye dt o the number s show

n below : 1

- "Test

Method s fo r

Evaluatin g Soli dWaste , Physical/Chemica l Methods" , SW-846 , Thir dEdition , 198 6 a s amended b y Updat

e I (Jul y 1992) , U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Offic e o f Soli dWast

e (NTIS , 528 5 Por t

Royal Road , Springfield , V A 22161 ) o r mor e recen t editio n o r revisio n (GPO , Supt . o f Documents , Washington , D C 20402) . 2

- "Standar

dMethod s fo r

the Examinatio n o f

Wate r andWastewater" , 18t

h Edition , American Publi c Health Associatio n (101 5 Fifteent h Street , NW , Washington , D C 20005) , American Wate r Work s Association , Water

Environment

Federation , 1992 , o

r mor e recen t editio n o r update . 3

- "Annua

l Book o f AST M Standards" , America n Societ y fo r Testin g an dMaterial s (191 6 Rac e Street , Philadelphia , P A 19013-1187) , 1992 , o r mor e recen t editio n or

revision . 4

- "Method s fo r

Chemica l Analysi s o f

Water andWastes" , EPA-600/4-79-020 , U.S . Environmental Protectio n Agency , Environmenta l Monitorin g an dSuppor

t Laborator

y (Cincinnati , O H 45268) , as revise dMarc h 1983 , o

r mor e recen t revisio n o

r technica l edition . 5

- Infrare dAnalysi s Metho di n IERL-RT P Procedure s Manual : Leve l 1 Environmental Assessmen t (2n dEdition) , EPA-600/7-78-201 , October , 1978 , o r mor e recen t edition . 6
- "Aci dDigestio n Bombs" , Bulleti n 4745 , Par r Instrumen

t Compan y (Moline , I L 61265) , o r

mor e recen t bulletin . 7

- "Method s fo r

Organi c Chemica

l Analysi s o f

Municipal an dIndustrial Wastewater" , Appendi x A o f Titl e 4 0 Cod e of Federal Regulation s Part 136 , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Environmental Monitorin g an dSuppor t Laboratory-Cincinnati , as amende d Jun e 198 6 o r

mor e recen t revision . 8

- "CW M Analytical Method s Manual" , Chemica l Wast e Management , Inc. , Analytica l Programs , Septembe

r 1992 . Standar danalytica

l procedure s liste dher

e whic h ar

e revise dca

n be implementedupon th e effectiv e dat e o f th e revision , wit h notificatio n to th e IEPA-DLP C Permi t Section .

WAP-A- 8 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4APPENDI X WAP-B AS H AN D DR Y SCRUBBE RSOLTO S SAMPLIN G PROTOCO LAPPENDI X WAP- B AS H AN D DRY SCRUBBE RSOLID S SAMPLIN G PROTOCO L 1. 0 PURPOS E Th e TW I Incinerator s destroy hazardou s waste s i n hig h temperatur e therma l oxidatio n processes . Thi s procedur e provide s assuranc e tha

t arepresentativ e sampl

e of as h o r dr y scrubbe r solid s (DSS ) i s collecte dfo r analysis . 2. 0 SAMPLIN G 2. 1 Sampl e Identificatio n 2.1. 1 Eac h sampl e containe r i s labele d with date , tim

e o f day , sampler , and containe r identificatio n number . Th e sample s ar

e logge d int o th e laborator

y Productio n Chain-of-Custod y logboo k upon deliver

y t o th e laboratory . 2. 2 Sampl e Collectio n 2*2. 1 As h an d DS S sample s ar e collected , analyze d an d evaluated o n aquarterl y basi s t o ensur e th e residual s me

t the LD Rtreatmen

t standards . 2.2. 2 Sample s are collected a s outline d i n Sectio n 2.2. 1 o f th e WAP . A n auge

r i s typicall y use d t

o obtai n arepresentativ e sampl

e o f th e as h o

r DSS . Eac h sampl

e ja r mus t b e fille dwit h as h o

r DSS . 2.2. 3 Traine d operation s personnel wil l collect th e sampl

e and subsequentl

y acknowledge custod

y b y completin g applicable section s o f th e laborator

y Productio n Chain-of-Custod y logbook . Sampl e preparatio n and analysi s wil l b e performe d as soo n a s practicable followin g whic h th e dispositio n o f th e as h (Sectio n 4.0

) wil l b e determined . 2. 3 Samplin g Personnel 2.3. 1 I t i s th e responsibilit

y o f Facility Managemen

t to assign onl

y qualifie dpersonne l t

o performth e as h o r DS S sampling . Personne l tha t hav e been traine d i n the implementatio n o f thi s procedur

e are considere d to be qualifie d 3. 0 SAMPL E ANALYSI S 3. 1 Eac h sampl e wil l b e sen t to aCW M o

r CW M approved la

b fo r analysi s o

f LD Rconstituent s b y th e appropriate method . 3. 2 Th e trackin g of

wast e codes throug h th e incineratio n proces s to th e incinerato r residual s wil l b e don

e i n accordanc e wit

h TW I Standard Divisio n Practic e 1651 .

WAP-B- 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 44.

0 DISPOSITIO N O F AS H AN D DR Y SCRUBBE RSOLID S (DSS ) 4. 1 An y containe

r o f as h o r DS S tha t wa s sampled fo r

testin g i n accordance to th e appropriat

e treatmen

t standard or

prohibition , wil l be retaine d b y th e facility unti l result s ar e availabl e fo r

evaluation . 4. 2 Th e analysi s result s ar e evaluated agains t

th e LD Rtreatmen

t standard s fo r

th e code s i n th e container . Th e containe

r i s release d i f

al l treatment

standard s ar

e met . 4. 3 Th e analysi s result s ar e evaluated agains t

th e LD Rtreatment

standard s fo r

al l code s accepted b

y TWI . Meetin g th e treatmen t standard s i s demonstrated throug h th e process . 4. 4 Whe n complianc e wit h th e LD Rstandard s has bee n demonstrated , th e materia l wil l b e stabilize dand subsequently disposed of

a t CW M approve d hazardou s wast e managemen

t facilities . Th e manifes t

and Lan dDisposa

l Restrictio n Treatmen

t Certificatio n wil l be completed prio r t o shipment .

WAP-B- 2 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4APPENDI X WAP- C WAST E ACCEPTABILIT Y CRITERI AAPPENDI X WAP- C WAST E ACCEPTABILIT Y CRITERI A Th e followin g restriction s apply to th e acceptance o f waste s exhibitin g certai n propertie s o r specifi c waste s a t TWI . Prio r

to acceptance (se

e Sectio n 5.2) , the Mandator y Analyse s an d th e Wast e Profil e Shee

t wil l b e evaluate d agains t

thi s appendix . An y restriction s identifie dwil l be documented o n th e wast

e managemen

t decision . Th e lis t

o f item s unde

r each o f thes e heading s i s no

t mean t t o be exhaustive . Th e profilin g proces s wil l includ e arevie w o f

th e MSDS s an d asearch o f the othe r bibliographi c resource s (se e Appendi x WAP-F ) fo r synonyms , produc t

names , commo

n names . Th e natur

e o f th e restriction s are a

s follows : REJEC T - Thes e Material s ma y notb e processed atthe facility . Radioactiv e Waste s Thoriu mCompound s Uraniu mCompound s Radioactiv e material s a

s define d b y the TW I Par t B RCR A Permit , or

greate r than 0. 5 millirad s per

hou r (pe r Sectio n 3.1.4

) Permi t Limite dWaste s F02 0 F02 1 F02 2 F02 3 F02 6 F02 7 F02 8 PCB s > 5 0 pp m(o

r othe r TSC A regulate d PCBs )

WAP-C- 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Regulator y Specifie dTreatmen

t Technolog

y othe r tha n Incineratio n D00 6 NiC dBatterie s D00 8 Lea daci dBatterie s K06 9 Non-Calciu mSulfate Othe r Unacceptabl e Waste s Asbesto s SPECIA L PACKAGIN G - Waste s exhibitin g th e propertie s liste d below (water/ai r reactive , malodorous , rapi d hea t release) durin g the profilin g proces s ma y b e accepted i f

they ar e shippe d i n specia l packaging , repackaged o n site o r i f th e materia

l conform s t o specification s allowin g processing i n existin g TW I facilities . Water/Ai r

Reactiv e Waste s Isocyanate s Nitrate s Chlorate s Perchlorate s Thiony l chloride Meta l turning s Phosphorou s Meta l hydride s Silane s Chloroformate s Methylamin e Oleu m Othe r water o r ai r reactiv e waste s

WAP-C- 2 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Malodorou s Compounds

Mercaptan s Sulfide s Waste whic h exhibit s energeti c characteristic s Waste whic h exhibit s energeti c characteristic s (e.g. , propellants , explosives , pyrotechnics , flammable liquids , etc. ) wil l either

be accepted pe

r th e Smal l Quantit

y Chemica

l guideline s o

r wil l be accepted pe

r th e followin g procedure . Whe n th e volum

e o f awast e strea mor changes i n incinerator

performanc e indicate s tha t alarge r charg e size i s warranted , TW I wil l follo w th e followin g procedure : 1 ) Th e materia l wil l b e reviewe d usin g referenc e information , MSDS s wher e available , generato

r discussion s o

r previou s experience . Base d o n thi s review , TW I wil l determine i f alarge r charg e siz e i s acceptable . 2 ) Whe n i t

ha s bee n determine d tha

t alarge r charge siz e i s acceptable , TW I wil l either : a ) Determine i f

thi s typ e o f

materia l has bee n previousl

y processed a

t TW I i n larger

charg e size s an d thereb y establis h acharge size ; o r b) Conduct

ates t burn o f the material to determin e wha t charg e siz e woul dbe acceptable . Thi s tes t burn wil l star

t wit h the quantit

y specifie di n the SQCG' s o f th e energeti c componen

t an d b e increase d b y n

o mor e than doubl

e th e previou s charge fromthi s startin g poin t based o n th e incinerator

operations . Th e incinerator operation s parameter s whic h wil l b e evaluated to determine i f

charg e siz e ca

n be increase d wil l be as follows : > Vacuu mdecreas e i n th e primar y o r secondar y chamber . > Temperatur

e increas e i n th e primar

y chambe r o f > 100° F > Visua l interruptio n o f the primar

y flam e > Non-stead

y stat e ga s flow . NOTE : Thi s tes t

protoco l ma

y b e utilize dto establis h revise d charge size s fo r al l material s previously limite d i n th e SQCG's . Tes t

bur n documentation wil l be provide d t o th e IEPA-DLP C prio r

t o implementin g larger charg e sizes .

WAP-C- 3 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4DIOXI

N TESTIN G - Waste

s whic h contai n greater than 0.01 % o f these constituent

s requir e dioxi n analysi s a ta 1 pp m threshol d before acceptance . Erbo n (2-(2,4,5-tricWorophenoxy)-ethyl 2,2-dichloropropanate) ) Hexachlorophene (2,2-methylene-bi s [3,4,6-trichlorophenol] ) 2.4.5

- trichloropheno l 2.4.6

- trichloropheno l 2,4,5- T (2,4,5-trichlorophenox y acetic acid

) 2,4,5-TP (2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy ) propanoi c acid , Silvex ) 2,3,4,6-tetrachloropheno l Pentachloropheno l (PCP ) Ronne l (0,0-dimethy l 0-(2,4,5-trichlorophenyl)phosphorothioate) Debri s fromfir e involvin g PCB s o r th e compoimd

s liste d abov

e Som e o f thes e waste s (Silvex , 2,4,5-T , an d PCP ) ar e detected b

y th e screening test s whic h wil l b e employed o n dioxi n suspect

wast e stream s pe r

th e TW I Dioxi n Suspect

Wast e Policy . Additional waste s liste d above , i f indicate d b y th e generato r o n th e profil e information , wil l b e teste d usin g ga s chromatograp

h techniques ; Th e followin g ar

e bran d nam

e product s whic h includ

e th e compoimds liste d abov e (thi s lis t

i s no t intende d to b e al l inclusive) : AMCHE M FARMC O FENC E RIDE R SPONTO X AMIN E 2,4,5- T FENOPRO P SUPE RD WEEDON E AQUA-VE X FORRO N T-NO X BRUSH-RHA P FRUTTON E T TORMAN A BRUSHTO X INVERTO N 24 5 TRANSAMLN E DACIN E KURO N TRIBUTO N DED-WEE D KUROSA L TRINOXO L DOUBL E STRENGT H LIN E RIDE R U4 6 DOWCID E 3 PENCHLO R VEON24 5 DOWCID E 6 PENTACO N VERTO N 2 T DOWCID E 2 S PENWA R VISK O RHA P LO W DOWCID E EC- 7 PRILTO X VOLATIL E ESTE R DOWCID E G-S T REDDO N WEEDA R ENVER T D T SANTOBRFT E WEED-B-GON E ENVER T T SANTOPHE N WEEDBEAD S EMULSAMTN E B K SILVI-RA P WEEDON E ESTERON E snsnruH O WAP-C- 4 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4APPENDI X WAP- D DETERMINATIO N O F INCOMIN G WAST E CONFORMANCE/NONCONFORMANC EAPPENDI X WAP- D INCOMIN G WAST E CONFORMANCE/NON-CONFORMANC E Incomin g wast

e ma y var y fromth e informatio n determine ddurin g th e profilin g phas e du e to the variabilit

y i n the proces s generatin g th e wast e o r i n collectio n o f

th e wast e material . I n orde

r t o determine whethe

r a particula r incomin g wast

e strea mconform s to th e profile , th e followin g criteri awil l be used . Al l othe r Mandator y an dSupplementa

l analysi s dat acollectedwil l b e use dt o allo w TW I t

o determine the bes t

metho d fo r processin g th e wast

e material . 1 . p H Screen : A variatio n i n the p H fro mthe range specifie di n the profil e documents ma y indicat e achang e i n th e wast

e stream . I f

ap H variatio n beyon

dth e rang e specifie don the liqui dprofil e sheet , th e procedure s outline di n Sectio n 5.2. 4 wil l b e initiate d(e.g. , awast

e whic h i s normally neutra l i s foun dto b e corrosive) . Material s wil l b e evaluate dfo r

conformanc e as follows : Profilin g Analytica l Resul t Acceptable Range < 2 < 2 2-12. 5 2-12. 5 >12. 5 >12. 5 Waste s profile das p H 2 to p H 12. 5 bu t shippedwit h a

n accompanyin

g LD Rfor mfo r

D002 wil l b e considere dconformin g a

t p H < 2 o

r p H > 12. 5 i f

supporte dby th e profile dchemica l constituents . 2 . Flammabilit

y Potentia l Screen : A variatio n i n the thermal activit y fromth e indicator s specifie di n th e profil e documents wil l indicat e achang e i n the wast

e stream . I f

the variatio n cause s achange i n th e hazar dclas s o f

th e waste , th e procedure s outline di n Sectio n 5.2. 4 wil l b e initiate d(e.g . a materia l whic h di dn6 t

exhibi t flammabilit

y potentia l i n th e profilin g phas e does durin g th e incoming shipmen t procedures) . 3 . PCBs : Th e unexpecte dpresenc e o f PCB s > 50 pp mcontrar y to tha t specifie di n th e profil e document s wil l indicat

e achang e i n th e wast

e stream , whic h woul dinitiate th e procedure s outline d i n Sectio n 5.2.4 . TW I i s not permitte dto accep

t PCB s > 5 0 pp mo

r TSC A derive dPC B wastes . 4 . Radioactivit

y Screen : Th e presenc e of radioactiv e material s as determine db y th e radioactivit y screen (se e Sectio n 3.1.4

) wil l initiat e the procedure s a s outline di n Sectio n 5.2.4 , leadin g t o rejectio n o f

th e material .

WAP-D- 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4Apparent Viscosity : A significan

t variatio n i n th e apparen

t viscosit y fromtha

t specifie di n th e profil e documents wil l indicat

e achang e i n the wast

e strea mtha t woul dinitiate th

e procedure s outline d i n Sectio n 5.2.4 .

WAP-D- 2 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4APPENDI X WAP- E CONTAINERIZE D WASTE : SPECIA L SAMPLIN G PROCEDURE SAPPENDI X WAP- E CONTAINERIZE D WASTE : SPECIA L SAMPLIN G PROCEDURE S 1. 0 PURPOS E Thi s procedur

e provide s assuranc e tha

t representativ e sample s o f th e followin g containerize d waste s ar e collecte dfo r

analysis . Specifically , thes e ar e containerize d waste s o f debri s an d lik e material , adhesive s an d othe

r highly elasti c substances , and resin s and othe r har d materials . Representativ e sample s ar

e collecte db y usin g multipoin t sampling . 2. 0 DEFINITION S

2. 1 Debri s an d lik e material - include s wood , bricks , concrete , vegetation , plasti c sheeting , protectiv e clothing , etc . 2. 2 Adhesive s an d othe r highly elasti c material s - sticky , glue-like , gummy , stretchabl e materials . 2. 3 Resin s an d othe

r har d material s - plastic s an dplasti c components , epoxie s andothe r physically simila r material s tha

t hav e hardened o

r cured . ? 2. 4 Multipoin t

sample - A sampl

e compose

d of subsample s collecte dfro mth e sam e containe

r that i s representativ e th e contents of the container . 3.0 INSPECTIO N

Eac h containe

r wil l b e evaluate d prio r

to openin

g t o determine it' s integrity . Afte r opening , th e container' s content s wil l b e visually inspected t o determine whethe r or no t i t conform s wit h it s profile ddescription . 4. 0 PERCEN T SAMPLE D

Se e Waste Analysi s Pla n Sectio n 5.1 . 5. 0 SAMPLIN G

Multipoin t

sample s based o n inspection wil l b e collecte d fro mcontainer s selecte d fo r sampling . Samplin g equipmen

t wil l b e selected based o

n result s o f

th e inspection . Sample s wil l be i n CW M custod y fro msampl

e collectio n unti l transfer o f custod y to th e analytica

l laboratory . Samplin g equipmen

t wil l b e decontaminated prio r to an d afte r samplin g eac

h wast e stream .

WAP-E- 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 45. 1 HIGHL Y ELASTI C SUBSTANCE S Adhesive s an d othe

r highly elasti c substance s wil l b e sampled with ascoo p o r shove l and scissor s o r tongs . Th e procedur

e i s to : 5.1. 1 di p th e shove

l o r scoo p into the materia

l to th e dept

h o f th e blade an d rotate ; 5.1. 2 lif t th e scoo

p o r shovel wit

h the sampl

e an d cu t with the scissor s o

r tongs , a s appropriate ; 5.1. 3 win dthe hanging portio n o f the sampl

e ont o the scoo

p o r shove l an d transfer

the sample t o th e sampl

e containe

r by scraping th e material fro mth e shovel o r scoo p int o th e sampl e container . 5. 2 DEBRI S AN D LIK E MATERIA L Debri s an d like material s wil l b e sample d with scissors , hammer, chise l an d tong s a s appropriate . The procedur e i s to : 5.2. 1 us e hamme

r an d chise l t

o collec t sample s o f

wood , bric k

o r othe r har d materia

l fromth e top o f the containe

r an d place i n the sampl

e containe

r with tongs ; 5.2. 2 us e scissors to cu

t sampl e o f tyve k an d othe r easily cutabl e material s (padding , rubber , plasti c sheeting , etc. ) an d place i n sampl e containe

r wit h tongs . 5. 3 RESIN S AND/O ROTHE RHAR D MATERIAL S Resin s and/o

r othe r har d material s wil l b e sample d wit h ahammer , chise l an d tong s o r scoop . Th e procedur

e i s to : 5.3. 1 Us e hamme

r and chise l to reduc e material(s ) siz e so that i t ca n easil y b e placed i n a sample containe

r an d plac e the sampl

e i n th e containe

r with tong s o

r scoop . 6. 0 SAMPLIN G PERSONNE L

I t i s th e responsibilit

y of Facility Managemen

t t o assig n onl

y qualifie dpersonne l t

o perfor m specialize dsamplin g of

containerize d waste . Personne l tha t have been traine d i n th e implementation o f thi s procedur

e ar e considered to b e qualified . 7. 0 SAMPL E ANALYSI S

Sample s wil l b

e analyze d a

s specifie di n Section s 3.1 , 3.2 , an d 3.3 , an d Figur e 3- 1 o f the WAP . Additiona l analysi s wil l b e performe d a t th e reques t o f th e Facility Management . WAP-E- 2 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4APPENDI X WAP- F BIBLIOGRAPH Y O F STANDARD CHEMICA L REFERENC E MATERIAL SAPPENDI X WAP- F BIBLIOGRAPH Y O F STANDAR D CHEMICA L REFERENC E MATERIAL S

1 . Th e Merc k

Index , Curren t

Edition , 1983 Merc k

& Co . Inc. , Rahway , NJ .
2 . Dangerou s Propertie s of Industrial Chemicals , Curren t Editio n 1989 , Va n Nostran d Reinhold , N Y NY .
3 . Handbook

o f Reactiv e Hazards , Curren t Edition , 1987 , Butterworths , London .

4 . Condense d Chemica l Dictionary , Curren t

Edition , 198

7 Va n Nostran d Reinhold,N Y NY .
5 . CW M AS-40 0 computerize d MSD S system , current version .

6 . Far mChemical s HI , Meister Publishin g Co .

7 . Chemica

l Synonym s & Trade Names , Curren t Edition , 198

7 Growe r Technica l Press .
8 . Lange' s Handboo k o f Chemistry , Curren t

Edition , 1985 McGraw-Hill .
9 . Handbook

o f Reactiv e Chemicals , Curren t Edition , 1985 L . Bretherick .
10 . Handbook

o f Chemistr y & Physics , Curren t

Edition , 197 6 CR C Press .

WAP-F- 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4APPENDI X WAP- G HM-18 1 COMPATIBILIT Y CLASSE SAPPENDI X WA P - G HM-18 1 COMPATIBILIT Y CLASSE S

DO T Clas s NAM E 1. 1 - 1. 6 Explosive s 2. 1 - 2. 2 Aeroso l Can s 3 Flammable Liqui d 4. 1 Flammabl e Solid s 4. 2 Spontaneousl y Combustible s 4. 3 Dangerou s Whe n We t 5. 1 Oxidizer s 5. 2 Organic Peroxide s 2. 3 Poisonou s Gas Zon e A & B 6. 1 Poisonou s Liqui dZon e A 8 Corrosive s 9 Miscellaneou s N.O.S . Debri s Non-Hazardou s Materia l

WAP-G- 1 REVISIO N 1 1 9/29/9 4

### CHEMICALWASTE MANAGEMENT PCB SCREENING

POUCY

### CWM PCB SCREENING

POUCY

INTRODUCTION Th e Toxi c Substance s Contro l Ac t (TSCA ) i s th e primar y sourc e o f federa l regulation s affectin g th e managemen t o f Polychlorinate d Biphenyl s (PCBs) . Mos t o f th e provision s o

f th e TSC A regulation s specifie d i n 4 0 CF R Par t 76 1 appl y t o PCB s onl y i

f PCB s are presen t i n concentration s abov e specifie d levels . Th e 4 0 CF R Par

t 76 1 subpar t D Storag e an d Disposa l provision s appl y generall y t o materia l a

t concentration s o

f 5 0 part s pe r millio n (ppm ) an d above . However , n o provisio n specifyin g a PC B concentratio n ma y b e avoide d b y dilutin g PC B containin g material s unles s otherwis e specificall y provided . Furthermore , th e Resourc e Conservatio n an d Recover y Ac t (RCRA ) i s a n additiona l sourc e o

f federa l regulation s affectin g th e managemen t o f hazardou s wast e containin g PCBs . Th e lan d disposa l o f liqui d hazardou s waste s containin g PCB s a t concentration s greate r tha n o r equa l t o 5 0 pp m i s prohibite d unde r th e provision s o

f 4 0 CF R Par

t 268.3 2 (a)(2) . Th e lan d disposa l o f liqui d o r non liqui d hazardou s wast e containin g halogenate d organi c compound s (HOCs ) includin g PCB s (se e 4 0 CF R Par t 26 8 Appendi x II

I fo r a listin g o

f HOCs ) a

t concentration s equa l t o o r greate r tha n 100 0 mg/ L o r 100 0 mg/kg , respectively , i s prohibite d unde r th e provision s o f 4 0 CF R Par

t 268.3 2 (a)(3) , (e)(1) , an d (e)(2) th e "Californi a List. " I n addition , th e managemen t o f liqui d hazardou s wast e containin g PCB s a

t concentration s o

f 5 0 pp m o r abov e a s wel l a s liqui d o r non liqui d hazardou s waste s containin g HOC s includin g PCB s (se e 4 0 CF R Par

t 26 8 Appendi x II

I fo r lis t o f HOCs ) i n tota l concentration s equa l t o o r greate r tha n 100 0 mg/ L o r 100 0 mg/k g fo r liqui d o r solid , respectively , ar e specifie d unde r th e provision s o

f 4 0 CF R Par

t 268.42 . Finally , th e lan d disposa l o f hazardou s wast e containin g PCB s an d identifie d b y th e liste d hazardou s waste cod e number s K08 5 an d F03 9 (multi-sourc e leachate ) i s regulate d unde r Specifi c Lan d Disposa l Restriction s (LDR ) provision s unde r 4 0 CF R Par t 268.43 . Thes e regulation s require PCB s t o b e treate d t o th e followin g level s (Tabl e I ) prio r t o lan d disposal .

2 Revisio n 1 Octobe r 199 1PC B Screenin g Policy 

### TABL E I
Waste Wate r Non-Wast e Wate r K08 5 & F03 9 mg/ L mg/k g Aroclo r 101 6 0.01 3 0.92 Aroclo r 122 1 0.01 4 0.9 2 Aroclo r 123 2 0.01 3 0.9 2 Aroclo r 1242 0.01 7 0.9 2 Aroclo r 1248 0.01 3 0.9 2 Aroclo r 125 4 0.01 4 1.8 Aroclo r 126 0 0.01 4 1.8

Stat e an d loca l agencie s an d permit s may als o regulat e th e managemen t o f PCBs . Complianc e wit h thes e regulation s i s require d whereve r the y ar e mor e stringen t tha n federa l regulation s (e.g. , certai n state s requir e tha t th e PCB s b e reporte d o n a dr

y weigh t basis) . Additionally , TSC A addresse s PCBs , no t Aroclors . Thi s include s incidentall y produce d PCB s an d foreig n produce d material s tha t includ e Clophen® , Phenoclor* , Pyralene* . Kanechlor* , an d Fenclor * I n orde r t o assur e tha t th e appropriat e practice s are bein g applie d consistentl y throughou t Chemica l Wast e Management , Inc . (CWM ) regardin g th e managemen t of waste s whic h may potentiall y contai n PCBs , i t i s importan t t o defin e procedure s t o b e employe d throughou t th e company . Therefore , th e followin g Polic y an d Procedure s ha s bee n developed .

3 Revisio n 1 Octobe r 199 1PC B Screenin g Polic y



### //. POUCY A . Th e treatment , storage , an d disposa l o f an y TSC A regulate d wast e shal l occu r onl y a

t a TSC A approve d treatment , storage , o r disposa l facility . B . Al l PC B analyse s require d a s a resul t o f th e applicatio n o f thi s polic y shal l b e performe d by a CW M laborator y o r a CW M approve d wast e laboratory . C . An y wast e tha t wil l b e analyze d fo r PCB s i n accordanc e wit h thi s polic y shal l not b e accepte d fo r storage , treatment , o r disposa l unti l PC B analyse s hav

e bee n complete d an d evaluated . D . An y non-TSC A wast e whic h meet s th e followin g criteri a shal l b e treate d a s a PC B suspec t wast e unti l demonstrate d otherwise , throug h chemica l analysis . 

### ///. PCB

SUSPECT

WASTE

CRITERIA Th e followin g criteri a hav e bee n develope d b y Chemica l Wast e Management , Inc . throug h its extensiv

e operatin g experience s a s wel l a s throug h revie w o f variou s source s o

f literatur

e fo r definin g a waste a s bein g PC B Suspect . Thes e criteri a ar e intende d t o supplemen t existin g requirement s whic h may have bee n impose d throug h permi t conditions , administrativ e orders , o r othe r agreement s wit h federa l o r stat e regulator

y agencies . A . Generator-Define d PC B Wast e An y wast e fo r whic h th e generato r ha s indicate d o n th e "Generator' s Wast e Materia l Profil e Sheet " o r an y othe r supportin g documentatio n tha t PCB s ar e presen t below regulate d levels .

4 Revisio n 1 Octobe r 199 1PC B Screenin g Polic y B . Oi l Bearin g Wast e NOTE : . Oi l bearin g waste s ar e define d a s an y materia l (liquid , solid , organic , o r aqueous ) containin g oi l a s describe d o n th e "Generator' s Wast e Materia l Profil e Sheet " (othe r supportin g documentation ) O R an y materia l whic h exhibit s th e visua l presenc e of oil . Th e visua l presenc e o f oi l ma y include , bu t i s not limite d to , a n oi l emulsion , oi l film , oi l phase , o r wate r solubl e oil . I

t i s th e responsibilit y o f th e Laboratory Manage r a t eac h divisio n t o us e soun d judgmen t base d o n thei r analytica l experienc e t o mak e th e fina l determinatio n i f a wast e strea m exhibit s th e visua l presenc e o f oil . C . Municipa l Wast e Wate r Treatmen t Facilit y Sludg e D . Bul k

Laboratory Waste s E . Baghous e Dust s fro m Secondar y Smelter s (e.g. , copper , aluminum ) F . An y Wast e a s Designate d b y th e Laboratory Manage r G . A H Wastes , Liquid s o r Solids , fro m th e following : 1 . Electrica l Utilit y Compan y 2 . Natura l Ga s Pipelin e Transmissio n Compan y 3 . Solven t Recovery , Reus e o r Recyclin g Uni t 4 . Oi l Recovery , Reus e o r Recyclin g Uni t 5 . Oi l Maintenanc e Center s 6 . Pon d Closure s (includin g Pon d Sludge s an d Dredgings ) 7 . Remedia l Actio n Superfun d Site s 8 . RCR A Correctiv e Actio n Project * 9 . Timber/Lumbe r Treatin g Facilit y 10 . Hydrauli c Equipmen t 11 . ENRA C Remedia l Actio n Projects *

* Unles s demonstrate d non-TSC A

5 Revisio n 1 Octobe r 199 1PC B Screenin g Polic y 12 . Hea t Transfe r Units 13 . Meta l Machinin g (Cutting ) Operation s 14 . Pesticide/Herbicid e Manufacturin g 15 . In k

an d Pigmen t Manufacturin g 16 . Oi l Base d Pain t Manufacturin g 17 . Pape r Recyclin g Operation s 18 . Roofin g Fel t Manufacturin g o r Processin g 19 . Aut o Fluf

f 20 . Non-WM I Wast e Treater s 21 . Chlorobenzen e Manufacturin g 

### IV . PROCEDURE S A . Pre-Acceptanc e Sample s Pre-acceptanc e sample s are t o b e analyze d fo r PCB s b y a laborator y i f th e wast e strea m meet s an y o f th e criteri a specifie d i n sectio n II I above . B . Incomin g Wast e Shipmen t Sample s Th e nee d t o analyz e incomin g wast e shipmen t sample s fo r PCB s wil l b e establishe d by th e result s o f th e sale s sampl e analysi s an d evaluatio n o f th e sale s sampl e Wast e Profil e Shee t informatio n agains t thi s policy . Tabl e I I describe s th e overal l requirement s discusse d below . f f a wast e strea m doe s no t meet an y o

f th e PC B suspec t criteria , the n ther e i s n o specifi c requiremen t t o perfor m PC B analyse s o n th e incomin g shipment s of thi s wast e strea m unles s specificall y require d unde r a Wast e Analysi s Pla n (WAP) .

6 Revisio n 1 Octobe r 199 1PC B Screenin g Polic y f f a wast e strea m meet s an y o f th e PC B Suspec t Criteri a an d th e sale s sampl e analysi s indicate s PCB s are les s tha n 5 ppm 1 o r th e regulator y limit (Th e ER A TSC A offic e ha s recentl y specifie d concentration s o f les s tha n 2 pp m PCB s i n treatmen t residue s fo r approva l an d refe r t o Tabl e I fo r liste d cod e specifications) , whicheve r i s lower , the n th e laboratory/technica l manage r must specif y o n th e Wast e Managemen t Decisio n (WMD) whethe r PC B analyse s o n incomin g wast e shipment s ar e require d and , I f so , th e frequenc y o

f analyses . I f a wast e strea m meet s an y o f th e PC B Suspec t Criteri a an d th e sale s sampl e analysi s indicate s PCB s are abov e 5 ppm 1 o r th e regulator y limit , whicheve r i s lower , the n th e laboratory/technica l manage r must specif y o n th e WM D tha

t PC B analyse s o n incomin g wast e shipment s ar e require d an d th e frequenc y a t whic h tha

t analysi s i s t o b e performed . I f th e receip t materia l demonstrate s a chang e i n th e waste fro m th e pre acceptanc e sampl e an d i t no w meet s th e PC B suspec t criteria , the n PC B analysi s must b e performe d befor e treatment , storage , o r disposal .

1 Th e specifi c criterio n o f 5 pp m i s th e typica l laborator y reportin g limi

t fo r PC B analysis , f

t i s a conservativ e approac h t o protectin g th e integrit y o f non-TSC A facilities .

7 Revisio n 1 Octobe r 199 1PC B Screenin g Policy TABL E I I
WP S

No ta Suspec

t ( WMD ) N o Actio n Require d ^ 1 PC B Suspec tI 

# I 1 La b Dat a CW M o r Generato

r

( WMD ) Frequenc y o f Testin g 

# )

< 5 pp m PC B ( Ye s o r N o ) ( WMD)i f Ye s Frequenc y o f Testin g 

# )

Meet s PC B Suspec t Criteri a *Sale s Sampl e

PC B Result s Receivin g Procedure s

N o Ye s

Ye s < 5 pp m

> 5 pp m N o specifi c action s required .

Specify i n Wast e Managemen t Decisio n (WMD ) whethe r PC B analyse s o n incomin g wast e shipment s ar e require d and , i f so , th e frequenc y o f analyses . WM D must specif y tha t PC B analyse s ar e require d o n incomin g wast e shipment s an d must specif y th e frequenc y of thos e analyses .

* o r th e regulator

y limit , whicheve r i s lower .

8 Revisio n 1 Octobe r 199 1

### Trade Wast e Incineratio n 7 Mobil e Avenu e Sauget . I L 62201-106

9 618/271-280

4



### TRAD E HAST E I MC I HERA T I O H DIOXI N

SUSPEC T ANALYSI S POLIC Y '

SEPTEMBE R 28 , 199 4

a divisio n o f CJk Chemica l Wast e Management , Inc . Printe d o r recycle d pa pTW I DIOXI NANALYSI S POLIC Y INTRODUCTIO N Trad e Wast e Incineratio n i s implementin g thi s polic yfo r th e screenin g o f waste s whic h ma ycontai n dioxins . Thi s polic y wil l identif yth e type s o f waste s whic h mus t h e analyse d fo r dioxin s o r dioxi n precursor s prio r t o approva l fo r acceptanc e a s a wast e strea ma t TWI . Implementatio n o f thi s polic ywil l provid e a mean s o f ensurin g tha t potentiall ydioxi n contaminate d waste s ar e analyze d fo r dioxi n conten t an d subsequentl ymanage d appropriatel yaccordin g t o applicabl e stat e an d federa l regulations . Th e fina l decisio n t o manag e a dioxi n bearin g wast e mus t b e mad e accordin g t o _th e condition s an d restriction s o f th e governin g facilit yWa§£ e Analysi s Pla n an d operatin g permits . » POLIC Y A . Wast e stream s contemplate d fo r managemen t a t TW I wil l b e subjecte d t o th e Dioxi n Suspec t Wast e Criteri a durin g th e decisio n evaluatio n proces s o f th e profilin g procedure . B . Waste s whic h ar e determine d t o mee t th e Dioxi n Suspec t Wast e Criteri a wil l requir e analysi s fo r dioxi n precursor s prio r t o acceptanc e an d managemen t fo r treatmen t an d disposa l a t th e facility . C . Waste s whic h ar e foun d t o contai n dioxi n precursor s a t o r abov e th e sit e actio n leve l fo r precursor s wil l requir e dioxi n analysi s prio r t o acceptanc e an d managemen t fo r treatmen t an d disposa l a t th e facility . D . Waste s whic h ar e foun d t o contai n dioxin s a t o r abov e th e sit e actio n leve l wil l no t b e accepte d fo r managemen t fo r treatmen t an d disposa l a t th e facilit yunti l suc h tim e tha t treatmen t an d disposa l ar e allowe d accordin g t o th e condition s an d restriction s o f th e governin g facilit y Wast e Analysi s Pla n an d operatin g permits .III . DIOXI NSUSPEC T HAST E CRITERI A Th e followin g criteri a ha s bee n develope d fo r definin g a wast e a s dioxi n suspect . Thes e criteri a ar e intende d t o supplemen t existin g requirement s whic h ma yhav e bee n impose d throug h permi t conditions , administrativ e orders , o r othe r agreement s wit h federa l o r stat e authorities . Haste s considere d unde r thes e criteri a remai n subjec t t o al l existin g condition s impose d b yChemica l Wast e Managemen t policie s an d environmenta l directives . A . Generato r Define d Dioxi n Waste . An ywast e fo r whic h th e generato r ha s indicate d o n th e "Generator' s Wast e Materia l Profil e Sheet no r an yothe r supportin g documentatio n tha t dioxin s o r dioxij a precursor s ar e presen t a t an ylevel . i B . Waste s Pro mth e Following : Thes e waste s wil l b e considere d a s suspec t i f the yma y hav e bee n subjec t t o historica l contaminatio n fro m dioxin s o r dioxi n precursors , o r i f th e waste s contai n a know n dioxi n o r dioxi n precurso r material . 1 . Timber/Lumbe r Treatin g Facilities . 2 . Pesticide/Herbicid e Manufacturin g Facilities . 3 . Manufacturer s o r Processe s Using : a ) mono- , di* , tri- , o r tetrachlorophenols , an d thei r chloro-phenox yderivativ e acids , esters , amine , an d othe r salts . b ) pentachloropheno l c ) mono- , di- , tri- , tetra- , penta- , o r hexachlorobenzenes . d ) trichlorophenoxypropioni c aci d (silvex ) e ) trichlorophenoxyaceti c aci d (2,4 ,5 -T ) f ) hexachlorophen e 4 . Combustio n product s fro msource s outsid e o f th e CWM/WM X Technologie s famil yo f companie s wher e suc h combustio n occurre d unde r uncontrolle d condition s an d th e formatio n o f dioxin s o r dioxi n relate d compound s i s suspecte d t o hav e occurre d (i.e . th e combustio n o f PVC , CPVC , etc.) . C . Waste s bearin g EP Ahazardou s wast e number s F032 , F039 , K001 , K015 , K016 , K030 , K042 , K043 , K085 , K099 , K105 , K149 , K150 , an d K151 .I V . PROCEDURE S
A . Precurso r Analysis : Dioxi n precurso r analysi s ma yb e conducte d b yHPLC , G C o r GC/MS , o r immunoassa yscree n technique s followin g approve d EP Amethod s o r CH M modification s o f suc h methods . 1 . Profil e Approva l Samples : Profil e approva l sample s a r e t o b e analyse d fo r dioxi n precursor s i f th e wast e strea mmeet s an yo f th e criteri a specified?± n sectio n II I above . Haste s whic h ar e bein g reprofile d o r recertifie d du e t o change s i n th e proces s generatin g th e waste , o r a s a resul t o f generato r informatio n gathere d durin g th e non conformanc e resolutio n durin g incomin g analysi s lir e als o subjec t t o th e criteri a specifie d i n sectio n III . ? 2 . Incomin g Hast e Shipmen t Samples : a ) Th e nee d t o analys e incomin g wast e shipmen t sample s fo r dioxi n precursor s wil l b e establishe d b yth e result s o f th e profil e approva l sampl e analysi s an d a n evaluatio n o f t h e wast e profil e shee t informatio n agains t t h e criteri a establishe d i n thi s policy . b ) I f a wast e strea mdoe s no t mee t an yo f th e criteri a establishe d i n sectio n II I o f thi s policy , the n ther e i s n o specifi c requiremen t t o perfor mdioxi n precurso r analysi s o n th e incomin g shipmen t sample s o f th e wast e stream . c ) I f th e receip t materia l demonstrate s a chang e i n th e wast e fro mth e profil e approva l sampl e (i.e . informatio n provide d b yth e generato r durin g th e non-conformanc e resolutio n process) , an d i t no w meet s th e criteri a establishe d i n sectio n II I o f thi s policy , the n dioxi n precurso r analysi s mus t b e performe d a s par t o f th e incomin g analysis . d ) Haste s whic h mee t th e criteri a establishe d i n sectio n II I o f thi s polic yan d whic h exhibite d negativ e scree n result s fo r dioxi n precursor s durin g profil e approva l analysi s wil l no t b e screene d upo n receipt .e ) Waste s whic h mee t th e criteri a establishe d i n sectio n II I o f thi s polic yan d whic h exhibite d positiv e scree n result s fo r dioxi n precursor s durin g profil e approva l analysi s wil l b e screene d upo n receip t i f th e profil e approva l scree n indicate d dioxi n precursor s abov e th e precurso r threshol d value , an d subsequen t dioxi n analysi s confirme d dioxin s belo w th e dioxi n threshol d valu e (o r no t present) . Th e incomin g scree n wil l b e limite d t o onl ythos e precursor s whic h wer e detecte d durin g profil e approva l analysis . I f th e incomin g scree n indicate s th e presenc e o f dioxi n precursors , incomin g dioxi n confirmatio n analysi s wil l b e conducte d i f th e level s o f precursor s i n th e incomin g scree n excee d th e level s o f precursor s i n th e profil e approva l analysi s wit h th e followin g guidelines : * i ) Profil e approva l precurso r scree n wa s positive , dioxi n confirmatio n analysi s wa s negative , non e detected .

- an d - Th e incomin g scree n indicate s precurso r level s greate r tha n a facto r o f 1 0 time s abov e th e profil e approva l results . i i ) Profil e approva l precurso r scree n wa s positive , dioxi n confirmatio n analysi s wa s negative , bu t dioxi n wa s detecte d belo w threshol d value .

- an d - Th e incomin g scree n indicate s precurso r level s greate r tha n a prorate d leve l abov e th e profil e approva l results . Th e prorate d leve l i s determine d a s follows : (DT L / DLD ) X PP L where : DT L = dioxi n threshol d leve l

DL D ~ dioxi n leve l detecte d

(profil e approval ) PP L = profil e approva l precurso r leve l Dioxi n Analysis : Dioxi n analysi s wil l b e performed , wit h th e concurrenc e o f th e generato r o f th e waste , followin g a dioxi n precurso r scree n whic h indicate s a precurso r presen t a t o r abov e 0.01 % b yweight . Detectio n limit s fo r dioxi n analysi s wil l b e se t a t a 1 par t pe r millio n threshold .DEFINITION S A . Dioxin : Genera l famil ynam e fo r compound s know n a s polychlorinate d dibenzo-p-dioxin s (PCDDs ) . Specifically , "dioxin " i s typicall yuse d t o refe r t o 2,3,7,8
- tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin , o r 2,3,7,8-TCDD . B . Dioxi n precursors : Chemical s whic h whe n manufacture d hav e bee n show n t o contai n dioxin s a s a wast e o r by
product * Dioxi n precursor s ar e o f simila r chemica l compositio n t o dioxins . Som e example s ar e 2,4,5
- trichlorophenol , silvex , an d hexachlorophene . C . HPLC : Hig h Pressur e Liqui d Chromatography . Thi s analysi s techniqu e i s use d i n CW M metho d #92-78 , "Th e Analysi s o f Chlorophenox yHerbicide s usin g HPLC" . D . GC . GC/MS : Ga s Chromatography , GC/Mas s Spectroscopy . Analysi s instrumentatio n use d fo r th e specifi c identificatio n o f numerou s organi c compounds . Typically , t h e method s fo r quantificatio n o f specifi c dioxin s o r dioxi n precursor s us e G C o r GC/M S techniques . E . Immunoassa yscreen : Aquick , semi-quantitativ e metho d o f identifyin g th e presenc e o f a specifi c chemica l o r chemica l family . Specifically , SW-84 6 Metho d 4010 , Immunoassa yTes t fo r th e Presenc e o f Pentachlorophenol . B:\TWIDIOX.TX TPO L IC Y RE V IE W O F PRO F IL E CONSTITUEMT S Suspec t pe r polic y



### I N o t suspec t pe r polic y ->> - Conduc t dioxi n precurso r analysi s Dioxi n precursor s foun d 

### i Procee d wit h decisio n process , n o pre - curso r analysi s
Precursor s no t foun d ->> - Doe s generato r wan t t o hav e dioxi n test - i n g performed ?



### T N

o Den

y decisio n 

### 1

N o dioxi n testin g N o precurso r testin g o n incomin g wast e Y e s Conduc t dioxi n analysi s
Wa s dioxi n detected ? 

### T V N o Y e s Wa s th e dioxi n 

### —>> H leve l > 1 ppm ?
Approv e decision , conduc t precurso r analysi s o n incomin g wast e shipment s



### I I s incomin g wast e shipmen t precurso r leve l > 1 0 time s th e profil e analysi s pre-curso r level f



### T V N o Y e s Den ydecisio n o r



## >>—(rejec t

shipmen t
Approv e decisio n (o r accep t wast e shipments) , conduc t pre - curso r analysi s o n incomin g wast e shipment s

->> - N o Accep t th e wast e shipmen t

Y e s Doe s th e generato r 

## Hwan t t o hav e dioxi n 

## testin g performed ? N o Rejec t th e wast e shipmen t

V Ye s

. j Conduc t dioxi n analysi s

T V Wa s dioxi n detected ? Y e s h-» H V N o Accep t th e wast e shipmen t -<< - 

# i : :

l i

- th e pr<$^\ . r a t el l incomin g waste. , shipmen t pri^u^ib ^ screen- ' d $ok1 # level ' •'<•

- V -P0i'; (seer'^6 1 1£ y sectio n IV , A v Zi »m,\ ill ? 1 r V 

### m V Ye s

Modif ydecisio n analysi s result ! f o r rati o o f pre - cursor s t o dioxin ^ i f necessar y Accept - wast e shipmen t