alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 33879]


Union Pacific Railroad Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--The 
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) has 
agreed to grant overhead trackage rights to Union Pacific Railroad 
Company (UP) over BNSF's rail line between BNSF milepost 117.4 near 
Shawnee Junction, WY, and BNSF milepost 0.0 near Northport, NE, a 
distance of 143.1 miles.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On June 6, 2000, UP filed a petition for exemption in STB 
Finance Docket No. 33879 (Sub-No. 1), Union Pacific Railroad 
Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--The Burlington Northern and 
Santa Fe Railway Company, wherein UP requests that the Board permit 
the proposed overhead trackage rights arrangement described in the 
present proceeding to expire on June 25, 2000. That petition will be 
addressed by the Board in a separate decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on, or as soon as 
possible after, June 10, 2000.
    The purpose of the trackage rights is to permit UP to use the BNSF 
trackage when UP's trackage is out of service for scheduled 
maintenance.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.-Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 653 
(1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33879, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading must 
be served on Robert T. Opal, 1416 Dodge Street, Room 830, Omaha, NE 
68179.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our website at 
``WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.''

    Decided: June 8, 2000.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-15048 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
§ 101-26.301-1 Similar items. ( a ) Agencies required to requisition, exclusively, items listed in the GSA Supply Catalog shall utilize such items in lieu of procuring similar items from other sources when the GSA items will adequately serve the required functional end-use purpose.
( b ) When an agency determines that items available from GSA stock will not serve the required functional end-use purpose of the item proposed to be procured, a request to waive the requirement to use this source shall be submitted to GSA for consideration in accordance with the provisions of § 101-26.100-2.
[36 FR 17424, Aug. 31, 1971, as amended at 38 FR 28566, Oct. 15, 1973]
§ 401.205 Civil and criminal penalties. ( a ) If the violation of the Seaway Regulations carries a criminal penalty, the Corporation's Chief Counsel is hereby authorized to determine whether to refer the case to the U.S. Attorney for prosecution in accordance with § 401.204, which outlines the appropriate procedure for handling criminal cases.
( b ) The decision of the U.S. Attorney as to whether to institute criminal proceedings shall not bar the initiation of civil penalty proceedings by the Associate Administrator.
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended sec. 104, Pub. L. 92-340 86 Stat. 424 and secs. 12 and 13 of sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471, and 49 CFR 1.52)
[50 FR 10963, Mar. 19, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 4341, Feb. 4, 1986]
#### § 960.8 Official authorized to take final action under the Act.

The Postal Service official who renders the final agency decision in a proceeding under § 952.26 or § 953.15, or the panel that renders the decision in an appeal before the Board of Contract Appeals under part 955 procedures, as the case may be, is authorized to take final action on matters pertaining to the Equal Access to Justice Act as applied to the proceeding.

[52 FR 6798, Mar. 5, 1987]
## E Pfl -fIa'oPPT-~ opS -,003,3

David Brooks /DC/USEPA/US 04/23/2008 11 :09AM

Hi Mike/Catherine: 

# ~p ~ R4-

To Mike Mattheisen/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Catherine Roman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Mark Townsend/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US, opreskodm@ornl .gov bcc Subject Urea, Reaction Products with Formaldehyde (Cas No.

68611-64-3) We have reviewed our contractor's report and are in agreement with their evaluation of information submitted for Urea, Reaction Products with Formaldehyde (Cas No. 68611-64-3) and its supporting substance (urea) . This report covers health and aquatic toxicity endpoints. The Health and Aquatic information were reviewed and found to be in compliance with the test guidelines specified by the test rule (71 FR 13708, March 16, 2006) . Therefore, these studies should be considered as satisfying the test rule requirements for the following tests : 

### Acute Mammalian toxicity Genetic toxicity (gene mutation, chromosomal aberration) Repeated-dose toxicity Reproductive toxicity Developmental toxicity Acute toxicity to fish, invertebrates (daphnia) andplants (algae) -Tl r We, as well as EETD, accept the submittor's response that no free (very low ppm levelsW formaldehyde is present in the reaction product, and further that no free (very low ppm levels) formaldehyde is subsequently formed as a result of the environmental or biological degradation of the product (See EETD's response below) . The revised TFl submission is OK . On the formaldehydequestion, any formaldehyde thatmight be formedas a product or intermediate ofbiodegradation or hydrolysis oftheparent materials would be biodegraded so fast that itmost likely would neverbe detectable even by the most sensitive methods. Probably the reason the submission does notsayit will not form is that this simply has not been experimentally confirmed. What l am saying is that itis not an issue . Even ifformaldehyde were in the pathwayor even an ultimateproduct, it would be biodegraded virtually as fast as it was formed. Robert Boethling ExposureAssessment Branch US EPA, Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics 1200Pennsylvania Ave, NW (7406M) Washington, DC20460 202-564-8533 (P) 202-564-8892 (F) If you require any other information, please do not hesitate to contact us. David Brooks Risk Assessment Division (7403M) High Production Volume Chemical Branch EPA East Room

6308N (202) 564-8603 

# CONTAINS NOCBI r LJ1



# 3oz y~~o h
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 22-CR-60205-RUIZ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JOSHUA DAVID LUBITZ,

Defendant.

_________________________/

DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF EXPERT EVIDENCE OF A

MENTAL HEALTH CONDITION

COMES NOW, the Defendant, JOSHUA DAVID LUBITZ, by and through his

undersigned attorney and pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 12.2, provides this notice to the

government of Expert Evidence of a Mental Health Condition and provides the following name

and address of the expert witness who would testify in the above styled case.

Michael P. Brannon, Psy.D.

The Institute for Behavioral Sciences and the Law

11760 W. Sample Road, #103

Coral Springs, Florida 33065

. Respectfully submitted by,

JONATHAN S. FRIEDMAN, P.A.

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

101 N.E. 3RD AVE.

SUITE 1500

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301

TELEPHONE: (954) 713-2820

FACSIMILE: (754) 301-5109

_/S/ Jonathan S. Friedman

JONATHAN S. FRIEDMAN, ESQ.

Case 0:22-cr-60205-RAR Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/20/2022 Page 1 of 2
FLORIDA BAR NUMBER: 973297

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 20, 2022, the undersigned attorney

electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court, United States Attorney’s

Office and other counsel of record, if any, using CM/ECF and has served same via U.S. Mail to

those counsel(s) or individuals, if any, who are not authorized to receive electronically Notice of

Electronic Filing.

_/S/ Jonathan S. Friedman

JONATHAN S. FRIEDMAN, ESQ.

Case 0:22-cr-60205-RAR Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/20/2022 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.390 When will the Coast Guard deny entry into a U.S. port? ( a ) Except for a foreign vessel entering U.S. waters under force majeure, no vessel shall enter any port or terminal of the U.S. without a safety management system that has been properly certificated to this subpart or to the requirements of Chapter IX of SOLAS if— ( 1 ) It is engaged on a foreign voyage; and
( 2 ) It is carrying more than 12 passengers, or a tanker, bulk freight vessel, freight vessel, or self-propelled mobile offshore drilling unit of 500 gross tons or more.
( b ) The cognizant COTP will deny entry of a vessel into a port or terminal under the authority of 46 U.S.C. 3204(c), to any vessel that does not meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
NAME TITLE

Tom Burke Paul Simons Bruce Maki Linda Maki Roz Frontieva Roger Frymiyre Seth Kaplan Vice President Jane Madden VP Valerie Nelson Director Chris John Senior Staff Counsel Andrea Rex Director Environmental Quality Jeffrey D. Neece Director of Public Works Southwick Bill Renault Town Engineer Tom Philbin MMA Analyst Michael Keyworth Director Jim Mullowney Chemist James Steinkrauss Deputy General Counsel Tom Walsh Engineer - Director- Treasurer Sean Maynihan VP Joe Favaloro Ex Director Alexe Law Flood Planner Todd Fresser Senior Environmental Consultant John Woodsmall Town Engineer Susan Leite EHS Officer Thomas? Shawn Konary Director Environmental Policy Tom rich President Tom Balf Executive Director Terri Goldberg Acting Executive DirectorAFFILIATION EMAIL

Westborough Waste Water Treatment Plant tburke5860@verizon.net Gladding- Hern Ship buildingPauls@gladding.hern.com Who Decides Ravenflypic@yahoo.com

Who Decides Info@whodecides.net Ramjet@alum.mit.edu Conservation Law Foundationskaplan@clf.org CDM maddenj@cdm.com Water Alliance Valerie.i.nelson@gmail.com MWRA MWRA andrea.rex@mwra.state.ma.us Southwick, MA jeffneece@southwickma.net Town of Concord, MA Wrenault@concordma.gov MMA tphilbin@mma.org Rhode Island Marine Trade Association Mkeyworth@bxy.com Pharma-Cycle Jmullowney@pharma-cycle.com Boston Water and Sewersteinkraussjj@bwsc.org Upper Blackstone WPADttwalsh@ubwpad.org Mass Chemistry smoyniham@themqithamgroup.com Joseph.favaloro@mwra.state.ma.us MassDEP alexe.lawflood@state.ma.us Mabbeti - Associates Dresser@mabbett.com Southborough MA Department of Public Works jwoodsmall@southboroughma.com MIT Smleite@mit.edu

Genon shawn.konary@genon.com RIMTA Trich@NEBoatworks.com c2e2 tbalf@c2e2.org NEMOA tgoldberg@newmoa.org
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5041

AN ACT

To establish the boundaries and classification of a segment

of the Missouri River in Montana under the Wild and

Scenic Rivers Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5041 EH

1 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF BOUNDARIES OF SEG2 MENT OF UPPER MISSOURI WILD AND SCE3 NIC RIVER, MONTANA.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Wild and Sce5 nic River Act (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.)—

6 (1) the boundaries and classification of the Mis7 souri River, Montana, segment designated by section

8 3(a)(14) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)(14)) shall

9 be the boundaries and classification published in the

10 Federal Register on January 22, 1980 (45 Fed.

11 Reg. 4474–4478); and

12 (2) the management plan for such segment

13 shall be as set forth in—

14 (A) the Upper Missouri Wild and Scenic

15 River Management Plan, dated October 1978,

16 as updated in February 1993; and

17 (B) the West HiLine RMP/EIS Record of

18 Decision covering the Upper Missouri Wild and

19 Scenic River Corridor, dated January 1992.

20 (b) REVISION OF BOUNDARIES, CLASSIFICATION,

21 AND MANAGEMENT PLAN.—This section shall not be con22 sidered to limit the authority of the Secretary of the Inte23 rior to revise the boundaries, classification, or manage24 ment plan for the Missouri River, Montana, segment re25 ferred to in subsection (a) after the date of the enactment
3

•HR 5041 EH

1 of this Act and in accordance with the Wild and Scenic

2 Rivers Act.

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall be con4 sidered to have become effective on April 21, 1980.

Passed the House of Representatives October 17,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5041

AN ACT

To establish the boundaries and classification of a

segment of the Missouri River in Montana underthe Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00229-CR

Jerry Wayne Johnson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-08-100051, HONORABLE CHARLES F. BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The Clerk received and filed a copyofJerryWayne Johnson’s pro se notice of appeal,

using the style and cause number shown on the notice. The Court has since learned that the local

cause number was a proceeding styled “In the Matter of a Court of Inquiry.” We are informed that

Johnson appeared as a witness in that proceeding, which resulted in an opinion and order concluding

that Tim Cole was innocent of the aggravated sexual assault for which he was convicted in 1986 in

Lubbock County. The opinion and order states, among other things, that Johnson, who is serving

life sentences for other crimes, came forward in 1995 and said that he committed the crime for which

Cole was convicted. 

Johnson was not a party to cause number D-1-DC-08-100051. Although the opinion

and order suggests that Johnson is guilty of the offense for which Cole was convicted, it does not
2

constitute a judgment of conviction. Under the circumstances, Johnson has no right of appeal from

the opinion and order in cause number D-1-DC-08-100051. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann.

art. 44.01 (West Supp. 2008) (appeal by State), 44.02 (West 2006) (appeal by defendant). 

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 4, 2009

Do Not Publish
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1127 Directorate ID: 2010-SW-035-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Model 430 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 52 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to correct the published Vne and to correct the 

indicated airspeed.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $46,074

Labor per Helicopter

(8 x $85/work-hour for the 

replacement)

$680

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $46,754

Total US Fleet Cost $2,431,208

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Mark F. Wiley
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,501,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,253,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                   111,937
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,862,765
<PP&E>                                       4,853,468
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,637,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,154,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,327,870
<BONDS>                                      1,712,672
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,149,095
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,964,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,154,196
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,474,277
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,971,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,804,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,610
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             130,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                504,136
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            504,136
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   504,136
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
§ 954.4 Office business hours; electronic filing. ( a ) The offices of the officials identified in these rules are located at 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201-3078. Normal Business hours are between 8:45 a.m. and 4:45 p.m. (Eastern Time), Monday through Friday except holidays.
( b ) The Judicial Officer electronic filing system website is accessible 24 hours a day at *https://usps-judicialoffice.journaltech.com .*
[81 FR 40193, June 21, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 61021, July 30, 2024]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                              52
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    379,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               459,450
<PP&E>                                         718,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                 429,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 805,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          397,165
<BONDS>                                        168,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     38,263
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   805,821
<SALES>                                        333,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               333,562
<CGS>                                         (14,463)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                239,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            239,760
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   239,760
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5016 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5016

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 514 Express Center Road in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``J.T. Weeker 
                           Service Center''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5016

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 514 Express Center Road in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``J.T. Weeker 
                           Service Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 514 
Express Center Road in Chicago, Illinois, and known as the Chicago 
International/Military Service Center, shall be known and designated as 
the ``J.T. Weeker Service Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J.T. Weeker Service 
Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 17, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 777.12 Purpose.

The purpose of these regulations is to update policy and procedures for the Postal Service's voluntary compliance with the Act.
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Sento Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony J. Sansone,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)   the Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)   the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Anthony  J. Sansone                |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Anthony J.  Sansone                    |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Secretary |   |
| November 12,  2004                     |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----