alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Stonewall  Financial,  Ltd. on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2002,  as filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 960.21 Judicial review.

A party other than the Postal Service may, within 30 days after a determination on the award is made, appeal the determination to the court of the United States having jurisdiction to review the merits of the underlying decision of the agency adversary adjudication in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).

[52 FR 6799, Mar. 5, 1987]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 14, 2018

No. 04-18-00346-CV

POINT DEDICATED SERVICES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

Ramon MORENO,

Appellee

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-10-34832-MCV

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion 

to compel arbitration. On June 7, 2018, we granted appellant’s motion to stay proceedings in 

the trial court pending resolution of the appeal in this court or until further order of this 

court. On June 12, 2018, appellant filed a motion to abate our June 7, 2018 order because 

the trial court informed counsel that it intends to vacate its order denying the motion to 

compel arbitration and enter a new order granting appellant’s motion to compel arbitration 

and staying proceedings in the trial court. 

In light of this, we GRANT appellant’s motion to abate for the limited purpose of 

allowing the trial court to enter a new order vacating its prior order and granting appellant’s 

motion to compel arbitration and staying proceedings in the trial court. In all other respects, 

our June 7, 2018 order remains in full force and effect pending resolution of the appeal in 

this court or until further order of this court.

We ORDER the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the 

trial court.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
§ 3030.127 Maximum rate adjustment authority. ( a ) The maximum rate adjustment authority available to the Postal Service for each class of market dominant mail is limited to the sum of the percentage points developed in subparts C through E and G through H of this part.
( b ) For any product where the attributable cost for that product exceeded the revenue from that product as determined by the Commission, rates may not be reduced.
Fw: EGU MACT -- Facilities expected to retire 

 12/15/2011 10:36 AM 

 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cortney - 

Here are the projected retirements you requested. 

thanx! 

bob 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

 

Phone: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

********************************************************* 

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

********************************************************* 

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/15/2011 10:36 AM 

----- 

From: Erich Eschmann/DC/USEPA/US 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin 

Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mikhail Adamantiades/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Sam 

Napolitano/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/15/2011 10:06 AM 

Subject: Re: Fw: EGU MACT -- Facilities expected to retire 

Bob -- Attached spreadsheet lists all unit projected to withdraw as 

uneconomic in 2015 under MATS that were not projected to withdraw as 

uneconomic in the base case. 

Note that IPM projections are based on model plants that provide a highly 

detailed approximation of the fleet but do not fully replicate each unit. 

IPM model results are post-processed to disaggregate the projections in 
order to present unit-level information. This procedure necessarily 

means that IPM modeling projections will not perfectly match a simple 

summation of post-processed unit-level results. EPA bases its regulatory 

impact analyses on IPM modeling projections at the system level and 

offers post-processed unit-level results to provide additional 

information for context. 

Erich Eschmann 

Clean Air Markets Division 

U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation 

 

202 343-9128 Phone 

202 343-2359 Fax 

eschmann.erich@epa.gov 

Projected Withdrawals_MATS Incremental from Base_12-15-11.xlsx
Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT TO THE INPIXON 2018 EMPLOYEE
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


This Amendment (the
“Amendment”) to the Inpixon 2018 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made pursuant to Section
12 of the Plan. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to them in
the Plan.


WHEREAS, the
Plan was approved and adopted by the board of directors (the “Board”) of Inpixon (the “Company”) on January
4, 2018 and approved by the stockholders of the Company on February 2, 2018;


WHEREAS, Section
12.2 of the Plan provides that the Board may modify or amend the Plan in whole or in part and from time to time in such respects
as it deems advisable;


WHEREAS, the
Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Plan as set forth below;
and


WHEREAS, the
stockholders of the Company approved this Amendment on October 31, 2019.


NOW THEREFORE,
the Plan is amended as follows:


1.     Section
1. Section 1 is hereby amended and restated with the following:


“Shares
Subject to the Plan.


Subject to an adjustment in accordance
with Section 8, the maximum number of shares which may be issued under the Plan shall be two million (2,000,000) shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Initial Limit”), of the Company (the “Shares”), which shall automatically
increase on the first day of each calendar quarter, beginning on April 1, 2018 and for each quarter thereafter through October
1, 2028, by a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the least of (i) 1,500,000 Shares, (ii) twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding
Shares on the last day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, or (iii) such number of Shares determined by the Committee
(the “Quarterly Increase”). The Company shall at all times while the Plan is in effect reserve such number of shares
of Common Stock as will be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of outstanding Awards granted under the Plan. The Shares subject
to the Plan shall be either authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares of Common Stock. If any Award is forfeited, or if
any Stock Option (and related Stock Appreciation Right, if any) terminates, expires or lapses for any reason without having been
exercised in full or shall cease for any reason to be exercisable in whole or in part, or if any Stock Appreciation Right is exercised
for cash, the unpurchased Shares subject to such Awards shall again be available for distribution under the Plan. Subject to such
overall limitations, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued in the form of Incentive Stock Options shall not
exceed the Initial Limit cumulatively increased on April 1, 2018 and on the first day of each quarter thereafter by the Quarterly
Increase.”


In all other respects, the terms and
conditions of the Plan shall remain the same.


 


[Signature page follows.]



     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company has adopted this Amendment, effective as of the 31st day of October , 2019.


 


	 	 	INPIXON
	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ Nadir Ali
	 	 	 	 	Name: Nadir Ali
	 	 	 	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
### The Cenozoic evolution of the San Joaquin Valley, California

By: J. Alan Bartow

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1501

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 3006.100 Applicability and scope. ( a ) The rules in this part apply to requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. These rules should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Guidelines).
( b ) Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed in accordance with the Commission's Privacy Act regulations appearing in part 3005 of this chapter and § 3006.204.
#### § 402.13 Operational surcharges—no postponements.

| Item | Column 1 Place in Montreal-Lake Ontario section | Column 2 Period after clearance date | Column 3 Amount ($) (5 locks)1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (a) | Cape Vincent (downbound) or Cap Saint-Michel (upbound) | (*a*) 24 hours (*b*) 24 hours or more but less than 48 hours (*c*) 48 hours or more but less than 72 hours (*d*) 72 hours or more but less than 96 hours | 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 |
| (b) | Port, dock or wharf within St. Lambert—Iroquois lock segment | (*a*) 24 hours (*b*) 24 hours or more but less than 48 hours (*c*) 48 hours or more but less than 72 hours (*d*) 72 hours or more but less than 96 hours | n/a 20,000 40,000 60,000 |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Prorated on a per-lock basis. | | | |

[[66 FR 15329](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/66-FR-15329), Mar. 16, 2001. Redesignated at [74 FR 10679](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/74-FR-10679), Mar. 12, 2009, and further redesignated at [79 FR 13253](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-13253), Mar. 10, 2014, and at [81 FR 14391](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-14391), Mar. 17, 2016]
Exhibit 32. 2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Unity Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dallas Pretty
, Chief Financial
 Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Dallas Pretty

By: Dallas Pretty
, Chief Financial
 Officer
March 31, 2006
§ 80.753 St. Petersburg, FL to the Anclote, FL. ( a ) A line drawn across Blind Pass, from the seaward extremity of the Long Key jetty to the seaward extremity of the Treasure Island jetty.
( b ) Lines formed by the centerline of the highway bridges over Johns and Clearwater Passes.
( c ) A line drawn across Dunedin and Hurricane Passes parallel with the general trend of the seaward, highwater shoreline.
( d ) A line drawn from the northernmost extremity of Honeymoon Island to Anclote Anchorage South Entrance Light 3; thence to Anclote Key position latitude 28°10.0′ N longitude 082°50.6′ W; thence a straight line to position latitude 28°11.11′ N, longitude 082°47.91′ W.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, as amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 21748, June 16, 1986; CGD 93-071, 58 FR 65668, Dec. 16, 1993; USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30877, June 28, 2019]
#### § 80.1310 Rogue River, OR.

A line drawn across the seaward extremities of the Rogue River Entrance Jetties.

[CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7788, Mar. 6, 1986]
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Jorge Lugo) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Jorge Lugo.

Dated this 29th day of March 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 447.61 General. ( a ) An employee shall report immediately to the General Counsel, U.S. Postal Service, Washington, DC 20260: ( 1 ) Any instance in which a person either within or outside the Postal Service uses or attempts to use a bribe, undue influence, or coercion to induce or attempt to induce the employee to act or neglect to act in regard to his official responsibilities; and
( 2 ) Any information that causes him to believe that there has been a violation of a Federal criminal statute or any law or regulation directly or indirectly related to the responsibilities of the Postal Service. A copy of a report made under this paragraph shall also be sent by the employee to the Chief Postal Inspector, Washington, DC 20260. The report shall be sent in a sealed envelope clearly marked “Limited Official Use—To Be Opened by Addressee Only”.
[39 FR 1990, Jan. 16, 1974. Redesignated at 60 FR 47245, Sept. 11, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.50-50 Seventeenth Coast Guard District. ( a ) *Description.* See § 3.85-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Line of demarcation.* There is no line of demarcation prescribed for this District. When required it will be determined in accordance with § 67.01-20.
[CGFR 68-95, 33 FR 15285, Oct. 15, 1968]
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

The Elie Neufeld, LLC, Plaintiff,

v.

Edward Wolf & Associates, LLC, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-23204-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and

Granting Final Default Judgment

The Court referred Plaintiff The Elie Neufeld, LLC’s motion for the entry of 

a default judgment to United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman for a 

report and recommendations. Thereafter, Judge Goodman issued his report and 

recommendations, recommending that the Court grant The Elie Neufeld’s motion 

in large part and deny it in part. (Rep. & Rec., ECF No. 20.) No objections to the 

report and recommendations have been filed by either party and the time to do 

so has passed.

Nonetheless, the Court has considered—de novo—Judge Goodman’s 

report, the record, and the relevant legal authorities. The Court finds Judge 

Goodman’s report and recommendations thorough, cogent, and compelling. The

Court thus adopts the recommendations in full (ECF No. 20) and grants, in

large part, The Elie Neufeld’s motion (ECF No. 17). Accordingly, the Court 

enters final default judgment in Plaintiff The Elie Neufeld, LLC’s favor, in the 

amount of $7,883.96 (comprised of $2,000 in statutory damages, $4,760.00 in 

attorney’s fees, and $1,123.96 in costs), against Defendant Edward Wolf & 

Associates, LLC.

The Court directs the Clerk to close this case. Any pending motions are 

denied as moot.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida, on July 10, 2023.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:22-cv-23204-RNS Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2023 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14606]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 00-1156; MM Docket No. 99-42; RM-9467; RM-9618]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Whitefield and Northumberland, NH

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Dana Puopolo, allots Channel 
256A to Whitefield, NH, as the community's first local aural service. 
See 64 FR 7841, February 17, 1999. Channel 256A can be allotted to 
Whitefield in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance 
separation requirements with a site restriction of 10.9 kilometers (6.8 
miles) northeast, at coordinates 44-27-17 NL; 71-31-36 WL, to avoid a 
short-spacing to Station WOKO, Channel 255C1, Burlington, VT. Canadian 
concurrence in the allotment has been obtained since Whitefield is 
located within 320 kilometers (200 miles) of the U.S.-Canadian border. 
The counterproposal filed by Barry P. Lunderville to allot Channel 256A 
to Northumberland, NH, is denied based on a finding that Northumberland 
is not a community for allotment purposes. A filing window for Channel 
256A at Whitefield will not be opened at this time. Instead, the issue 
of opening a filing window for this channel will be addressed by the 
Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective July 10, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie K. Shapiro, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-42, adopted May 17, 2000, and 
released May 26, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334. 336.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under New 
Hampshire, is amended by adding Whitefield, Channel 256A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-14606 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT 99(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alberto-Culver Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard B. Bernick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/    HOWARD B.
BERNICK             
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 8, 2003