alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA No. 00-1207; MM Docket No. 00-95, RM-9887]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Live Oak, Fl

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed by SSR Communications Incorporated requesting the allotment of 
Channel 259A at Live Oak, Florida, as the community's third local FM 
broadcast service. Channel 259A can be allotted to Live Oak with a site 
restriction 11.6 kilometers (7.2 miles) southeast of the community at 
coordinates 30-13-12 and 82-54-00.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before July 24, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before August 8, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, as follows: Matthew K. Wesolowski, SSR 
Communications Incorporated, 5270 West Jones Bridge Road, Norcross, 
Georgia 30092-1628.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-95, adopted May 24, 2000, and 
released June 2, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center, Washington, DC. The complete text of 
this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-
3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-15260 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
§ 962.21 Appeal of initial decision to judicial officer. ( a ) *Notice of appeal and supporting brief.* ( 1 ) A Respondent may appeal an adverse initial decision by filing, within 30 days after the Presiding Officer issues an initial decision, a Notice of Appeal with the Recorder. The Judicial Officer may extend the filing period if the Respondent files a request for an extension within the initial 30-day period and demonstrates good cause for such extension.
( 2 ) The Respondent's Notice of Appeal must be accompanied by a written brief specifying the Respondent's exceptions, and any reasons for such exceptions, to the Presiding Officer's initial decision.
( 3 ) Within 30 days of receiving the Respondent's brief, the Reviewing Official may file with the Judicial Officer a response to the Respondent's specified exceptions to the Presiding Officer's initial decision.
( b ) *Form of review.* ( 1 ) Review by the Judicial Officer will be based entirely on the record and written submissions.
( 2 ) The Judicial Officer may affirm, reduce, reverse, or remand any penalty or assessment determined by the Presiding Officer.
( 3 ) The Judicial Officer shall not consider any objection that was not raised in the hearing unless the interested party demonstrates that the failure to raise the objection before the Presiding Officer was caused by extraordinary circumstances.
( 4 ) If any party demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Judicial Officer that additional evidence not presented at the hearing is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to present such evidence, the Judicial Officer shall remand the matter to the Presiding Officer for consideration of such additional evidence.
( c ) *Decision of judicial officer.* ( 1 ) The Judicial Officer shall promptly serve each party to the appeal with a copy of his decision and a statement describing the right to judicial review under 31 U.S.C. 3805 of any Respondent determined to be liable under 31 U.S.C. 3802.
( 2 ) The decision of the Judicial Officer constitutes final agency action and becomes final and binding on the parties 60 days after it is issued unless a petition for judicial review is filed.
[52 FR 12904, Apr. 20, 1987, as amended at 67 FR 62179, Oct. 4, 2002]
### Summary of the hydrology of the Southeastern Coastal Plain aquifer system in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina

By: J. A. Miller

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1410A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00173-CR

IN RE ROBERT WHITFIELD

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this original proceeding, Relator Robert Whitfield seeks a writ of mandamus 

compelling Respondent Brian Evans, Freestone County District Attorney, to respond to 

Whitfield’s motion for early termination of his obligation to register as a sex offender. See 

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 62.404 (West 2018).

A court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district 

attorney except to protect its jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (West 

Supp. 2017). Whitfield’s petition does not allege facts that require us to protect our 

jurisdiction, so we do not have jurisdiction to decide his petition for writ of mandamus 

against the District Attorney. 

We thus dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.
In re Whitfield Page 2

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 30, 2018

Do not publish

[OT06]
EXHIBIT 7
                                                                      ---------


          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


         In connection  with Amendment No. 1 to the report of Western Oil Sands
Inc. (the  "Company") on the Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending  December 31,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
     Company.



Dated this 22nd day of February, 2007



/s/ David A. Dyck
---------------------------------
David A. Dyck
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer),
Western Oil Sands Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from ACCEL
International Corporation's first quarter 1997 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             59760
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                        5550
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                   74775
<CASH>                                             829
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               19269
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           29985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  193788
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  24716
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              80302
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       7
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  15000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           940
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    193788
<PREMIUMS>                                       10551
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                               1155
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  74
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     607
<BENEFITS>                                        6014
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                       6138
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    235
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       225
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   25256
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  24716
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Appendix tab descriptions

# Physiochemical

# Dissolved gases

# Major ions (1)

# Major ions (2)

# Dissolved and suspended solids

# Nutrients (1)

# Nutrients (2)

# Trace elements

# Sediment
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Defensive 
Information Operations (formerly known as the Task Force on Information 
Warfare--Defense) will meet in closed session on July 12-14, 2000, at 
the Strategic Analysis Conference Center, 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 
600, Arlington, VA 22201.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this 
meeting, the Task Force will review the progress made since the 1996 
Defense Science Board report on Information Warfare--Defense and 
determine the adequacy of the Department's process in providing 
information assurance to carry out Joint Vision 2010 in the face of 
information warfare attacks.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that this Defense Science Board meetings, concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly 
these meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: June 9, 2000.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-15077 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10--M
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5273

To clarify the intention of the Congress with regard to the authority of

the United States Mint to produce numismatic coins, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2000

Mr. BACHUS (for himself, Mr. LEACH, Mr. LAFALCE, and Ms. WATERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To clarify the intention of the Congress with regard to the

authority of the United States Mint to produce numismatic coins, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Mint

5 Numismatic Coin Clarification Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MINT’S AUTHORITY.

7 (a) SILVER PROOF COINS.—Section 5132(a)(2)(B)(i)

8 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking

9 ‘‘paragraphs (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2)’’.
2

•HR 5273 IH

1 (b) PLATINUM COINS.—Section 5112(k) of title 31,

2 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘bullion’’ and

3 inserting ‘‘platinum bullion coins’’.

4 SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL REPORT REQUIREMENT.

5 Section 5134(e)(2) of title 31, United States Code,

6 is amended—

7 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A),

8 by striking ‘‘reflect’’ and inserting ‘‘contain’’;

9 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara10 graph (C);

11 (3) by striking the period at the end of sub12 paragraph (D) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

13 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub14 paragraph:

15 ‘‘(E) a supplemental schedule detailing—

16 ‘‘(i) the costs and expenses for the

17 production, for the marketing, and for the

18 distribution of each denomination of circu19 lating coins produced by the Mint during

20 the fiscal year and the per-unit cost of pro21 ducing, of marketing, and of distributing

22 each denomination of such coins; and
3

•HR 5273 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) the gross revenue derived from

2 the sales of each such denomination of

3 coins.’’.

Æ
8756091v1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

AISHIA PETERSEN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:22-cv-22871-JEM 

AESOP USA, INC., 

Defendant. 

/ 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff AISHIA PETERSEN and Defendant AESOP USA, INC., (collectively, the 

“Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, say that the litigation has been resolved and 

hereby jointly move and stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of the above-styled cause. The 

parties agrees that each party will bear its own fees and costs. 

DATED this 16th day of December, 2022. 

/s/Acacia Barros 

Acacia Barros, Esq., Fla. Bar No. 106277 

ACACIA BARROS, P. A. 

11120 N. Kendall Drive, Suite 201 

Miami, FL 33176 

ab@barroslawfirm.com

Telephone: (305) 639-8381 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

/s/David P. Steffen 

David P. Steffen, Esq., Fla. Bar No. 0154717 

Primary Email: dsteffen@constangy.com 

Secondary Email: tampa@constangy.com

CONSTANGY, BROOKS, SMITH & 

PROPHETE, LLP 

100 North Tampa Street, Suite 3350 

Post Office Box 1840 

Tampa, Florida 33601-1840 

(813) 223-7166 / Fax: (813) 223-2515 

Attorney for Defendant 

Case 1:22-cv-22871-JEM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/16/2022 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Sento Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick F. O’ Neal,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Patrick F. O’ Neal |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |
| Patrick  F. O’ Neal     |
| Chief  Executive Officer     |
| November  13, 2003           |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (d) of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, As amended by section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Science and Technology Advisory board has been scheduled as follows:

# DATES:

26-27 June 2000 (800am to 1600pm).

# ADDRESSES:

Joint Battle Center, 1161 Lake View Parkway, Suite 150, Suffolk, VA 23435.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Maj. Donald R. Culp, Jr., USAF Executive Secretary, DIA Science and Technology Advisory Board, Washington, DC 20340-1328 (202) 231-4930.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The entire meeting is devoted to the discussion of classified information as defined in section 552b(c)(1), Title 5 of the U.S. Code, and therefore will be closed to the public. The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, on related scientific and technical matters.

Dated: June 9, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-15080  Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5271 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5271

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the rules applicable 
 to net worth limitation with respect to eligibility for pensions for 
                           certain veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2000

  Mr. Evans introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the rules applicable 
 to net worth limitation with respect to eligibility for pensions for 
                           certain veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Family Farm Preservation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF RULES WITH RESPECT TO NET WORTH LIMITATION FOR 
              ELIGIBILITY FOR PENSIONS FOR VETERANS WHO ARE PERMANENTLY 
              AND TOTALLY DISABLED FROM A NON-SERVICE-CONNECTED 
              DISABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1522(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following: ``In determining the 
corpus of the estates of the veteran and the veteran's spouse, if any, 
the value of the real property of the veteran and the veteran's spouse 
and children shall be excluded if such property is used for farming, 
ranching, or similar agricultural purposes.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to payment of pensions for months beginning on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Crim. No. 513.

Fourth Appellate District.

July 18, 1938.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. KENNETH KANADIAN, Appellant.

*618No appearance for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Burdette J. Daniels, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

BARNARD, P. J.

The clerk’s and the reporter’s transcripts were filed in this court on June 8, 1938, and no briefs have been filed and no extensions of time granted. The cause was on the calendar on July 12, 1938, and no appearance was made on behalf of the appellant. The attorney-general moved for an affirmance of the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code and no reason appears why the same should not be granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Haines, J., *pro tern.,*concurred.