alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, ThomasS. Astrup, Chief Financial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended November 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of January,2009.

 

 
| By:                                                        | /s/ THOMAS S. ASTRUP |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Name: Thomas S. Astrup                                     |                 |
| Title: Vice President-Finance and Chief  Financial Officer |                 |

 

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5325

To amend title 18, United States Code, to ensure that acts of torture,

as proscribed by the Torture Convention, are also recognized as criminal

if committed in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 2000

Ms. WATERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to ensure that acts

of torture, as proscribed by the Torture Convention, are

also recognized as criminal if committed in the United

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Torture Prevention

5 and Accountability Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. TORTURE IN THE UNITED STATES.

7 Section 2340A of title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended—
2

•HR 5325 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘or within’’

2 after ‘‘outside’’;

3 (2) in subsection (b)—

4 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of para5 graph (1);

6 (B) by striking the period at the end of

7 paragraph (2) and inserting ‘‘; or’’ and

8 (C) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(3) the offense takes place in the United

10 States.’’; and

11 (3) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘punished by

12 death or’’.

Æ
May 22, 2015 

 

Chris Kiefer 

101 Northeast Brookwood Parkway #101 

Hillsboro, OR 97124 

Dear Mr. Chris Kiefer: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 7, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA2015-913), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 101-25.110-3 Tires accompanying new motor vehicles.

The tire identifications and recordkeeping regulations issued by the Department of Transportation require each motor vehicle manufacturer or his designee to maintain a record of tires on or in each vehicle shipped by him together with the name and address of the first purchaser.

[37 FR 7794, Apr. 20, 1972]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 546

To amend title 18, United States Code, to protect the sanctity of religious

communications.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. KING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to protect the

sanctity of religious communications.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Communica5 tion Sanctity Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF SANCTITY OF RELIGIOUS COMMU7 NICATIONS.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 13 of title 18, United

9 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow10 ing:
2

HR 546 IH

1 ‘‘§ 249. Protection of sanctity of religious communica2 tions

3 ‘‘(a) Whoever, under color of governmental authority,

4 surreptitiously listens to or records in any manner, any

5 communication that is privileged, because of its religious

6 character, under Federal law or under the non-Federal

7 law of the place where such communication takes place,

8 shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than

9 5 years, or both.

10 ‘‘(b) Any person aggrieved by a violation of this sec11 tion consisting of the recording of a communication may,

12 in a civil action, obtain the prompt destruction of that re13 cording and any copies or transcripts made from that re14 cording.’’.

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

16 at the beginning of chapter 13 of title 18, United States

17 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

18 item:

‘‘249. Protection of sanctity of religious communications.’’.

Æ
#### § 101-30.400 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the policies and procedures governing the dissemination of Federal catalog data, the conversion to and use of the Federal catalog system by Federal agencies, and the requesting of supply support from Government supply managers.

[43 FR 42257, Sept. 20, 1978]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge,





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














By   /s/William S.
Ayer


William
S. Ayer


Chairman
& Chief Executive Officer


May 11,
2009
2019 FOIA Quarterly Report – Q2

Agency

Reporting Quarter

10 Oldest Requests

Did your agency have 10 or more perfected requests pending at the end of the last fiscal year? If so, please select 

the number 10. If your agency had fewer than 10, please select the correct number.

Of the ten or fewer requests identified in your previous response, please select the number of requests your 

agency has closed during the current fiscal year.

FOIA Requests Information

Component Requests Received in Requests Processed in Requests Backlogged as of

Reporting Quarter Reporting Quarter End of Reporting Quarter
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
<MULTIPLIER>                                1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                             12,323,152
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                   10,671,259
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>       140,457,032
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>              140,457,032
<LOANS>                           275,627,811
<ALLOWANCE>                         3,455,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    461,017,198
<DEPOSITS>                        328,501,119
<SHORT-TERM>                       94,528,431
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                 7,003,428
<LONG-TERM>                           933,763
<COMMON>                            7,824,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                         22,226,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>    461,017,198
<INTEREST-LOAN>                     5,974,954
<INTEREST-INVEST>                   2,577,005
<INTEREST-OTHER>                      109,716
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                    8,661,675
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                  2,941,737
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  4,358,447
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>               4,303,228
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                      4,337
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                     3,254,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     1,638,506
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          1,030,002
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        1,030,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                           0397
<LOANS-NON>                           471,000
<LOANS-PAST>                          975,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                      645,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               0
<RECOVERIES>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                     0
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                       CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Allen Telecom
Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, I, Robert G. Paul, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Allen Telecom Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: (1) such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Allen Telecom Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act
of 1934; and (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q
of Allen Telecom Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of
Allen Telecom Inc.





Date:  August 13, 2002                   By:      /s/ Robert G. Paul
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                    Robert G. Paul
                                                      President
                                               (Chief Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, James J. Horvath,President and Chief Executive Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company,certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof American Crystal Sugar Company (the registrant);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)             designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this quarterly report; and

 

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report anychanges in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors:

 

a)             all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of the internal controls over financialreporting which are likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| April 14,  2005 | /s/  JAMES J. HORVATH                  |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | James  J. Horvath                      |
|                 | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: F AA- 2011 - 0997 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM043AD

AMM 32 - 11 - 11 PB401, R36 --- 1/1/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
Opinion filed April 23, 2009

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

____________

No. 11-09-00053-CV 

__________

CAROL J. MORRIS, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 238th District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV46715

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A temporary injunction was issued against Carol J. Morris to abate a nuisance located on real

property owned by Morris and located at 210 S. Lee Street, Midland, Texas. On February 11, 2009,

Morris, pro se, filed this appeal from the temporary injunction. We dismiss the appeal as moot. 

Fifteen days after Morris filed her notice of appeal relating to the temporary injunction, the

trial court held a “final hearing” in the underlying case. Based upon that hearing, the trial court

rendered a final judgment and permanent injunction on March 2, 2009. Morris has also filed a pro

se appeal from the final judgment and permanent injunction – our Cause No. 11-09-00072-CV.
We note, however, that Morris’s appeal from the final judgment remains pending at this time in this court in Cause No. 11- 1

09-00072-CV. 

2

Upon receiving the latter notice of appeal and the trial court’s final judgment, the clerk of this court

wrote Morris on March 23, 2009, and informed her that her appeal of the temporary injunction

appears to be moot because of the issuance of the permanent injunction. Morris was requested to

provide this court with a written response showing grounds to continue the appeal in Cause No. 11-

09-00053-CV. 

Morris has responded in writing but has not shown grounds for continuing the appeal from

the temporary injunction. Morris asserts that we have renumbered her appeal, that both injunctive

orders violate the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, that this court has “unlawfully withheld the

appeal,” and that Morris “chooses to continue these appeals” in an effort “to obtain her entitled

equitable and compensatory relief.” Morris cites Smith v. O’Neill, 813 S.W.2d 501 (Tex. 1991), and

Murphy v. McDaniel, 20 S.W.3d 873 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2000, no pet.). Neither of these cases,

however, support the continued viability of this appeal. 

“If, while on the appeal of the granting or denying of the temporary injunction, the trial court

renders final judgment, the case on appeal becomes moot.” Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology

Group, P.A., 802 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1991). The court in Isuani determined that the court of

appeals should have dismissed the appeal of the temporary injunction as moot as soon as it learned

of the trial court’s final judgment. Id. at 237. Accordingly, having learned that the trial court has

entered a final judgment in the underlying case, we must dismiss this appeal of the trial court’s

granting of a temporary injunction.1

The appeal is dismissed as moot. 

PER CURIAM

April 23, 2009

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 333-52648, 333-120968 and 333-148339 on Form S-8 and No. 333-131115 on Form S-3 of Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) of our reports dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company (which report expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,on January 1, 2007), and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP                   
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania February 27,
2009
Exhibit 99(c)


                          Certificate as to Compliance
                          ----------------------------

         I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation
(the "Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 3.10 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 1999 among HFC
Revolving Corporation, as Depositor, the Master Servicer and Bank One, National
Association, as Trustee, that:

         1.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1
         through December 31, 2002 (the "Year") and of its performance under the
         Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

         2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the
         Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 31st day of March, 2003.



                                       /s/ STEVEN H. SMITH
                                       -------------------
                                       Steven H. Smith
                                       Servicing Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS  STATEMENT  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF
INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30,  1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0000003941
<NAME>                     ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                             684
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,138
<INVENTORY>                                     87,462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,881
<PP&E>                                         133,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          212,459
<BONDS>                                          1,924
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,351
<SALES>                                        156,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,864
<CGS>                                          144,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   706
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,991)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,991)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,991)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.18)



</TABLE>