alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cause No. PD______________ No. 12

- 14

- 00335

- CR (12th COA)
DONNIE DALE CARR § IN THE COURT Petitioner § § vs. § OF CRIMINAL APPEALS § THE STATE OF TEXAS Respondent § § FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
Now comes Donnie Carr and makes this Motion For Extension of Time to
File a Pro Se Pet ition for Disc retionary Review and for good cause shows the following:
I. The Twelfth Court of Appeals returned an opinion affirming Petitioner’s
conviction in this matter on 30 June 2015

. Carr v. State , 12

- 14

- 00335

- CR (Tex.App.

— Tyler 2015 ). No Motion for Rehe aring was filed in that court. Consequently, a Petition for Discretionary Review, if any, is to be filed by 30 July
2015

. II. Petitioner was timely notified of his right to pursue a pro se Pet ition for Discretionary Review and was also told that undersigned counsel, who was PD-0930-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/24/2015 10:29:17 AM Accepted 7/24/2015 11:26:52 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKappointed to represent Petitioner in the Twelfth Court of Appeals , would be willing to continue to represent him on a pro bono basis in the filing of a PDR. After brief correspondence between counsel and Petitioner, Petitioner recently indicated he
would like counsel to file a PDR on his behalf. During the thirty days preceding the date for filing PDR in this case,
counsel has been working on approximately 55 open appellate cases in
intermediate courts of appeal to which he has been appointed by Smith County.
This has included investigating motions for new trials (looking for and talking with potential witnesses, jail and office visits with new appellate appointments, trial court appearances for the same), requests for and reviews of reporter’s and clerk’s records, research, br iefing, review of opinions, investigation of potential PDR issues, etc. While not all of these cases have required significant attention from counsel during this time, many of them have which has resulted in counsel having
been un able to devote the full a ttention necessary to drafting the PDR in this case prior to today’s date.
For this reason, counsel respectfully requests a one

- time, thirty day
extension to file PDR in this matter. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED , Petitioner respectfully prays that, in accordance with the applicable law, the Court gra nt this Motion andextend the time by which to have a Petition for Discretionary Review filed by thirty days. Respectfully submitted,
/s/Austin Reeve Jackson Texas Bar No. 240461 39 112 East Line, Suite 310 Tyler, TX 75702 Telephone: (903) 595

- 6070 Facsimile: (866) 387

- 0152

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
document was served on counsel for the State by efile concurrently with its filing.
/s/Austin Reeve Jackson
#### § 101-27.205 Shelf-life codes.

Shelf-life items shall be identified by use of a one-digit code to provide for uniform coding of shelf-life materials by all agencies.

(a) The code designators for shelf-life periods of up to 60 months are as follows:

| Shelf-life period (months) | Type I item code | Type II item code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | A | |
| 2 | B | |
| 3 | C | 1 |
| 4 | D | |
| 5 | E | |
| 6 | F | 2 |
| 9 | G | 3 |
| 12 | H | 4 |
| 15 | J | |
| 18 | K | 5 |
| 21 | L | |
| 24 | M | 6 |
| 27 | N | |
| 30 | P | |
| 36 | Q | 7 |
| 48 | R | 8 |
| 60 | S | 9 |

(b) Code designator 0 is used to identify items not included in a shelf-life program.

(c) Code designator X shall be used to identify critical end-use items, military essential items, and medical items with a shelf life greater than 60 months. Agencies shall establish controls for such materials to prevent issuance of any unserviceable items.

(d) Agencies may also establish controls for materials with a shelf life greater than 60 months that are not identified in paragraph (c) of this section. Such controls should be established only when they are necessary for effective management of the items.

[40 FR 59595, Dec. 29, 1975]
#### § 101-27.305 Disposition of long supply.

Where efforts to reduce the inventory below the economic retention limit have been unsuccessful, appropriate disposition should be effected in accordance with subpart 101-43.3 of this chapter. Any remaining inventory which is within the economic retention limit shall be retained. However, the item shall be reviewed at least annually and efforts made to reduce the long supply inventory in accordance with § 101-27.303.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of U-Haul
International, Inc., certify that:

1.  the Quarterly Report of U-Haul International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
    quarterly period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
    Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), which this statement
    accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U-Haul
    International, Inc.

                                            /s/ Edward J. Shoen
                                            --------------------------
                                                Edward J. Shoen
                                                Chairman of the Board
                                                and President
                                                February 14, 2003
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-22920-ALTONAGA/Damian

JAMES WATSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

OSTERIA NUMERO UNO, LTD.

Defendant

________________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

COMES NOW Plaintiff, JAMES WATSON, by and through the undersigned counsel, 

pursuant to Rule 41(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., hereby gives notice that he voluntarily dismisses this action 

with prejudice against, Defendant, OSTERIA NUMERO UNO, LTD, and respectfully requests 

this Court to terminate the action.

Respectfully submitted on this December 14, 2022. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-22920-CMA Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/14/2022 Page 1 of 2
Watson v. Osteria Numero Uno, LTD.

Case No.: 22-cv-22920-CMA

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this December 14, 2022, an electronic copy of the foregoing 

document was filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notice of 

electronic filing to all parties and Counsel of record.

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-22920-CMA Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/14/2022 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit	1

Case 1:22-mc-23619-RKA Document 5-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 2
10/13/22, 5:51 PM H.I.G. Capital -

https://higcapital.com/portfolio/company/328 1/1

Visit H.I.G. Capital

Investor Login



Search 

Terms and Conditions. All material on this site Copyright © 2022 H.I.G. Capital, LLC

Home › Portfolio › Maillis Group

Business Services Manufacturing

Established in 1968, the Maillis Group is the world's second largest manufacturer of end-of-line packaging equipment and

offers its customers "one-stop solutions". In addition to supplying consumables such as strapping and film products, Maillis

produces innovative packaging machines under well-known brand names including SIAT and offers its customers

international after-sales services.

Maillis is an international company with seven production sites located in Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, Canada and the

United States. Currently, the company has approximately 1,500 employees. With more than 15,000 customers and a broad

product portfolio, the company generates more than €260 million in revenues, less than 5% of which are in Greece. The

Company's customer base extends to the food and beverage, aluminum, steel, construction, timber and bailing industries

and it is the exclusive or preferred supplier to major industrial and consumer products multinationals such as US Steel,

Nestle, Coca Cola, P&G, Henkel, Pepsi, Mars, Lafarge, Alcoa, ArcelorMittal, Corus, Wall-mart and others.

For more information visit: https://www.maillis.com/en

Atlanta | Bogotá | Boston | Chicago | Dallas | Hamburg | London | Los Angeles | Luxembourg | Madrid | Miami | Milan

| New York | Paris | Rio de Janeiro | San Francisco | São Paulo

Case 1:22-mc-23619-RKA Document 5-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 963.15 Evidence. ( a ) In general, admissibility will hinge on relevancy and materiality. However, relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( b ) Testimony shall be given under oath or affirmation and witnesses are subject to cross-examination.
( c ) Agreed statements of fact are encouraged and may be received in evidence.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Identifyingincompatible combinations of concrete materials [electronic resource].**
 
vol 1|vol 2
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:05-056; TD 2.30:05-057

Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001062240

 
July 12, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23753-MOORE/LOUIS

EDWIN GARRISON, et al., on behalf of 

themselves and all other similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM BANKMAN-FRIED, et al.,

Defendants.

/

CERTIFICATION OF SUSAN E. ENGEL

Susan E. Engel, Esquire, pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing the Admission, 

Practice, Peer Review, and Discipline of Attorneys, hereby certifies that: (1) I have studied the 

Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; (2) I am a 

member in good standing of the Bar of the District of Columbia since 2003 and New York since 

2003; and (3) I have not filed three or more motions for pro hac vice admission in this District 

within the last 365 days.

/s/ Susan E. Engel

Susan E. Engel

Case 1:22-cv-23753-KMM Document 38-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 501.3 Postage Evidencing System provider qualification. Any person or entity seeking authorization to manufacture and/or distribute Postage Evidencing Systems must: ( a ) Satisfy the Postal Service of its integrity and financial responsibility.
( b ) Obtain Postal Service approval under this part of at least one Postage Evidencing System satisfying the requirements of Postal Service regulations.
( c ) Protect customer information by not causing or permitting the data to be released other than for the operation of a third-party location. The provider bears the ultimate responsibility to ensure customer information will not be compromised at any domestic or off shore locations (including third-party locations), and bears the responsibility to ensure its agents or contractors operating domestic or off shore locations do not compromise this information. The provider shall notify its customer that data relating to its systems is being housed at a third-party location, and shall provide a copy thereof to the Postal Service of such notice to its customers. To the extent that any unauthorized release takes place, the provider shall notify the Postal Service immediately upon discovery of any unauthorized use or disclosure of data or any other breach or improper disclosure of data of this agreement by the provider (as well as its agent operating the third-party location) and will cooperate with the Postal Service in every reasonable way to help the Postal Service regain possession of the data and prevent its further unauthorized use or disclosure. In the event that the Postal Service cannot regain possession of the data or prevent its further unauthorized use or disclosure, the provider shall indemnify the Postal Service from damages resulting from its (or such third-party) actions.
( d ) Have, or establish, and keep under its active supervision and control adequate facilities for the control, distribution, and maintenance of PES and their replacement or secure disposal or destruction when necessary and appropriate.
[71 FR 65733, Nov. 9, 2006, as amended at 76 FR 77149, Dec. 12, 2011; 85 FR 21776, Apr. 20, 2020]
United States Steel Corporation

– Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2012 **Item 13** Provide written explanation and supporting documents of how the facilit y could use NO X CEMs for process optimization. **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation of the**  **response:** Stephani Campbell, Chrissy Bartovich **Answer:** Please r efer to Minntac response to Item 13 for this item as the response provided therein applies to both Keetac and Minntac.
TSCHOPP, WHITCOMB & ORR, P.A.
                     2600 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 330
                             Maitland, Florida 32751

The Board of Directors
VoIP, Inc.
(Formerly Millennia Tea Masters, Inc.)

We consent to the use of our report,  dated January 30, 2004 with respect to our
audit of the financial statements of Millennia Tea Masters,  Inc.  (subsequently
known as VoIP,  Inc.) as of December 31, 2003 and for the year then ended in the
Form 10KSB/A dated November 23, 2005.


/s/ Tschopp, Whitcomb & Orr, P.A.


November 23, 2005
#### § 3045.19 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 117 (Friday, June 16, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Cape Cod National Seashore; South Wellfleet, Massachusetts; Cape 
Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission Two Hundred and Twenty-Ninth 
Meeting; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770 U.S.C. App 1, section 10), 
that a meeting of the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission 
will be held on Thursday, June 29, 2000.
    The Commission was reestablished pursuant to Public Law 87-126 as 
amended by Public Law 105-280. The purpose of the Commission is to 
consult with the Secretary of the Interior, or his designee, with 
respect to matters relating to the development of Cape Cod National 
Seashore, and with respect to carrying out the provisions of sections 4 
and 5 of the Act establishing the Seashore.
    The Commission members will meet at 10:00 a.m. at Headquarters, 
Marconi Station, Wellfleet, Massachusetts for the regular business 
meeting to discuss the following:

1. Adoption of Agenda (single item);
2. Subcommittee Report--Personal Watercraft Subcommittee;
3. Agenda and date for next meeting;
4. Public comment; and
5. Adjournment.

    The meeting is open to the public. It is expected that 15 persons 
will be able to attend the meeting in addition to Commission members. 
Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Commission during the business meeting or file written statements. Such 
requests should be made to the park superintendent at least seven days 
prior to the meeting. Further information concerning the meeting may be 
obtained from the Superintendent, Cape Cod National Seashore, 99 
Marconi Site Road, Wellfleet, MA 02667.

    Dated: June 5, 2000.
Michael Murray,
Deputy Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 00-15233 Filed 6-15-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
#### § 964.6 Default.

If a Petitioner fails to appear at the hearing without notice or without adequate cause the presiding officer may issue an order dismissing the Petition and refer the matter to the Judicial Officer for issuance of the order provided for under § 964.19. An order of dismissal issued under this section may be appealed to the Judicial Officer within 10 days from the date of the order.

[52 FR 36763, Oct. 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 4849, Feb. 18, 1988]
#### § 53.3 Applicability.

This part applies to members of the United States Coast Guard, the Board for Correction of Military Records of the Coast Guard, and the Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector General.

[56 FR 13405, Apr. 2, 1991, as amended by USCG-2003-14505, 68 FR 9535, Feb. 28, 2003]
#### § 101-26.106 Consolidation of requirements.

Full consideration shall be given to the consolidation of individual small volume requirements to enable the Government to benefit from lower prices normally obtainable through definite quantity contracts for larger volume procurements. This policy pertains to procurement from commercial sources either directly or through an intermediary agency and does not apply to GSA stock items or small volume requirements normally obtained from GSA customer supply centers. When it is practical, each agency shall establish procedures that will permit planned requirements consolidation on an agencywide basis. When it is impractical to plan requirements on an agencywide consolidated basis, the requirements consolidation effort may be limited to a bureau, to other agency segments, or to a program, if such limited consolidation will provide significant price advantages when procurement is effected on a volume basis. Requisitions for item requirements exceeding maximum order limitations in Federal Supply Schedule contracts shall be submitted to GSA in accordance with the applicable instructions in the respective schedules. Special buying services desired by agencies for procurement of other consolidated item requirements shall be requested from GSA in accordance with § 101-26.102.

[51 FR 13498, Apr. 21, 1986]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 520

Relating to the period of availability of certain emergency relief funds allocated under section 125 of title 23, United States Code, for carrying

out a project to repair or reconstruct a portion of a Federal-aid primary

route in San Mateo County, California.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. LANTOS (for himself, Mr. CAMPBELL, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. PELOSI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

Relating to the period of availability of certain emergency

relief funds allocated under section 125 of title 23,

United States Code, for carrying out a project to repair

or reconstruct a portion of a Federal-aid primary route

in San Mateo County, California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Devil’s Slide Tunnel

5 Act’’.
2

HR 520 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.

2 Section 6 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to apportion

3 certain funds for construction of the National System of

4 Interstate and Defense Highways for fiscal year 1985 and

5 to increase the amount authorized to be expended for

6 emergency relief under title 23, United States Code, and

7 for other purposes’’, approved March 9, 1984 (98 Stat.

8 55), relating to a project to repair or reconstruct a portion

9 of a Federal-aid primary route in San Mateo County, Cali10 fornia, is amended by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘A project’’

11 and by adding at the end the following:

12 ‘‘(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law,

13 sums that are allocated under section 3 for any project

14 alternative selected under this section before, on, or after

15 the date of the enactment of this subsection for a project

16 shall remain available until expended.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 15.01

May 31, 2006

Albertson's, Inc.
Boise, Idaho

We have made reviews, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial
information of Albertson's, Inc. and subsidiaries and of New Albertson's, Inc.
and subsidiary, both for the thirteen-week periods ended May 4, 2006 and May 5,
2005, as indicated in our reports dated May 31, 2006; because we did not perform
an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our reports referred to above, which are included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the thirteen week period ended May 4, 2006, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-54998 and
333-113995 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-59803, 333-121020,
333-82157, 333-82161, 333-87773, 333-73194 and 333-63019 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned reports, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, are not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-------------------------------------
Boise, Idaho