alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CATHERINE T. HILL, Respondent, *v.*JOHN HEERMANS, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered at the Steuben County Circuit on the verdict of a jury.

Mr. Eellows, an old man of great wealth, tired and oppressed with the care of his large estate, proposed to get relief to himself for the remaining period of his life by-trusting to the defendant the management of his property, with power, among other things, to sell the same and pay to him the proceeds, so far as such property was sold and converted into money during his lifetime ; and, with this view, executed two deeds of trust for such purpose, by which deeds he conveyed to the defendant in this action all his real and personal estate.

This action was brought by the plaintiff for the recovery of the possession of an oil painted portrait of Mr. Eellows, which plaintiff claimed Mr. Fellows had given to her, after the execution of the deeds above mentioned. The General Term *held,*that as Mr. Eellows would be entitled to the proceeds- of all sales of his property, he was clearly entitled to retain any of the articles of such property to himself, and convert them to his own use in lieu of the *662money; and might forbid the sale of family pictures and furniture, including the portrait of himself, and give it to his sister this plaintiff, as well, and with as much right, as he might give her the proceeds of such portrait if it had been sold and converted into money. That it was not such property as he could ever have intended to sell or divert from his family; and that the charge of the judge at Circuit, that the picture did not pass by the trust deeds, was correct.

That it was not within the spirit and intent of said deeds to convey or pass such property, any more than it was to sell the watch in his pocket or the coat upon his back.

*Brown '<& Sadden,*for appellant. *Geo. B. Bradley,*for respondent.

Opinion by

E. Darwin Smith, J.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Gilbert, J J.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 262.7 Non-records. ( a ) *Non-record material.* Includes blank forms and surplus publications, handbooks, circulars, bulletins, announcements, and other directives as well as any material not directly associated with the transaction of Postal Service business.
( b ) *Personal papers.* Those materials created or received during an individual's period of employment with the Postal Service which are of a purely private or nonofficial character, or which were neither created nor received in connection with Postal Service business.
§ 82.3 Pushing vessel and vessel being pushed: Composite unit. Rule 24(b) of the 72 COLREGS states that when a pushing vessel and a vessel being pushed ahead are rigidly connected in a composite unit, they are regarded as a power-driven vessel and must exhibit the lights under Rule 23. A “composite unit” is interpreted to be a pushing vessel that is rigidly connected by mechanical means to a vessel being pushed so they react to sea and swell as one vessel. “Mechanical means” does not include the following: ( a ) Lines.
( b ) Hawsers.
( c ) Wires.
( d ) Chains.
[CGD 76-133, 42 FR 35792, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981]
# Publicatieblad C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 427I |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 62e jaargang19 december 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 427I

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

62e jaargang19 december 2019

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Adviezen |
| | BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES |
| | Europese Commissie |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Oproep tot het indienen van aanvragen voor de Jan Amos Comenius-prijs voor onderwijs van hoge kwaliteit over de Europese Unie | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

V   Adviezen

BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES

Europese Commissie

2019/C 427 I/01

Oproep tot het indienen van aanvragen voor de Jan Amos Comenius-prijs voor onderwijs van hoge kwaliteit over de Europese Unie

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

V Adviezen

BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES

Europese Commissie

| 19.12.2019 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CI 427/1

---

Oproep tot het indienen van aanvragen

voor de “Jan Amos Comenius-prijs voor onderwijs van hoge kwaliteit over de Europese Unie”

(2019/C 427 I/01)

Het directoraat-generaal Onderwijs, Jongerenzaken, Sport en Cultuur van de Europese Commissie heeft een oproep tot het indienen van aanvragen voor de “Jan Amos Comenius-prijs voor onderwijs van hoge kwaliteit over de Europese Unie” gelanceerd.

De prijs beloont middelbare scholen die hun leerlingen op inspirerende wijze leren over de Europese Unie. Met deze prijs zal erkenning en zichtbaarheid in de hele EU worden gegeven aan boeiende activiteiten in elke lidstaat, waarbij wordt benadrukt hoe belangrijk het is om al op jonge leeftijd te leren over de EU. Daarbij worden met name innovatieve onderwijsmethoden voor het voetlicht gebracht waarbij de leerlingen actief bij het onderwijs over de EU worden betrokken, en zullen deze methoden ook worden verspreid.

De oproep staat open voor middelbare scholen (ISCED-niveau 2 en 3) die gevestigd zijn in de Europese Unie (niet voor individuele leerkrachten).

Bij deze wedstrijd worden achtentwintig (28) prijzen uitgereikt van elk 8 000 EUR, één per EU‐lidstaat.

Als het Verenigd Koninkrijk vóórdat de Europese Commissie een besluit over de toekenning van de prijs heeft genomen (wat kort na de beoordeling van de aanvragen gebeurt), uit de EU treedt zonder dat een overeenkomst is gesloten waarin wordt gegarandeerd dat aanvragers uit het Verenigd Koninkrijk voor de prijs in aanmerking blijven komen, kunnen scholen uit het Verenigd Koninkrijk niet langer meedingen. In dat geval worden in plaats van 28 maximaal 27 prijzen uitgereikt; het bedrag per prijs blijft echter gelijk (8 000EUR).

De uiterste termijn voor het indienen van aanvragen is 17:00 uur Midden-Europese tijd (MET) op donderdag 6 februari 2020.

Alle relevante informatie en de aanvraagformulieren zijn beschikbaar op:

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_nl

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

COREY BOSTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2024-1214

August 28, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141 (b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip Federico, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and LUCAS and LABRIT JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Designing an ADR Program","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MSMwxrI0pS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/designing\/\">Designing an ADR Program<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/designing\/embed\/#?secret=MSMwxrI0pS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Designing an ADR Program” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"MSMwxrI0pS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
§ 5.20 Authority. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, or otherwise limited by the Commandant, members of the Auxiliary assigned to duty will have the same authority in that duty's execution as a member of the Coast Guard who is assigned to a similar duty.
( b ) Members of the Auxiliary are not authorized to engage in direct law enforcement or military missions.
( c ) Members of the Auxiliary are not authorized to enforce limited access areas, regulated navigation areas, or special local regulations. Members of the Auxiliary assigned to patrol limited access areas, regulated navigation areas, or areas regulated under special local regulations may advise the public regarding compliance with the limited access area, regulated navigation area, or areas regulated by special local regulations.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 116 (Thursday, June 15, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-15068]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. AUC-00-35-B (Auction No. 35); DA 00-1246]


Auction of Licenses for C and F Block Broadband PCS Spectrum 
Postponed Until November 29, 2000

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document postpones the upcoming auction of C and F Block 
Broadband Personal Services spectrum scheduled to begin July 26, 2000, 
in order to provide additional time for bidder preparation and 
planning. The auction is rescheduled to begin November 29, 2000.

DATES: Auction No. 35 will begin November 29, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Bashkin, Auctions Legal Branch 
at (202) 418-0660, or Lisa Stover, Auctions Operations at (717) 338-
2888.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of a Public Notice 
released June 7, 2000. The complete text of the public notice is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20554. It may also be purchased from the Commission's 
copy contractor, International Transcription Services, Inc. (ITS, Inc.) 
1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800. It is also 
available on the Commission's web site at http://www.fcc.gov.
    The upcoming auction of licenses for the C and F Block Broadband 
Personal Communications Services spectrum, scheduled to begin on July 
26, 2000, is postponed until November 29, 2000, in order to provide 
additional time for bidder preparation and planning. By public notice 
the Commission will announce the procedures and terms of this auction. 
The key dates for this auction are listed below:
    Filing Deadline for FCC Form 175: October 16, 2000; 6:00 PM ET.
    Upfront Payment Deadline: November 6, 2000; 6:00 PM ET.
    Mock Auction: November 27, 2000.
    Auction Start Date: November 29, 2000.

    Federal Communications Commission.
Margaret Wiener,
Deputy Chief, Auctions & Industry Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. 00-15068 Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000126

-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000127

-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000128

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 3 of 13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000129

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 4 of 13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000130

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 5 of 13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000131

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 6 of 13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000132

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 7 of 13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000133

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 8 of 13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000134

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 9 of 13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000135

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 10 of

13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000136

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 11 of

13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000137

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 12 of

13
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000138

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 115-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 13 of

13
#### ROBERT F. SILLIMAN and others, Respondents, *v.*BENAJAH TYRRELL, sued with others, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs, entered on a verdict directed by the court.

This action was brought upon a promissory note, and the defense set up was, that a new note had been given in payment and satisfaction of the one sued upon.

*275The court below directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and this court, on a review of the facts in the case, affirmed the judgment entered on such verdict.

*Francis A. Smith,*for the appellant.

*U. G. Paris,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J.

Judgment affirmed.
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Ch.30 – Information Exchange

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Ch.30 – Information Exchange Ch.30 – Information ExchangeADR2022-02-18T11:41:14-05:00
			
			Ch.30 – Information ExchangeLitigation, mediation, arbitration, early neutral evaluation, and other processes boil down to methods of exchanging information so that a decision can be made.  In litigation and sometimes arbitration, the exchange process is costly and time consuming because it is based on the legal rights of the parties, as determined by a judge or arbitrator.  In mediation, facilitation, or negotiation, the process costs can be much lower because the parties can use their own judgement regarding the quality of the evidence and the ultimate resolution.
Understandably, some parties and their lawyers have trouble with the idea of going blindly into a mediation.  They fear, perhaps, they are being set up for a bad deal, or will be expected to settle with too little information. These concerns are normal, but certain tactics can reduce their anxiety.
**LEARN MORE**
**. . . About Saving Money**
Why Would Litigation be More Expensive?How Does Mediation or Other Forms of Assisted Negotiation Save Money?
**. . . About Information Exchange Tactics**
The Power to Leave the TableSmall Steps Leading to Trust or DistrustUse of Interest-Based DiscussionsTiming of Disclosures

Subpages (2): Explore the Information Exchange | Saving Costs to Exchange Information Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 27, 2000. 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco**                     (Maria Villanueva, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:                 

                    1.                     *Thomas W. Healy,*                     Olympia, Washington; Ned D. Williams, Gig Harbor, Washington; Ronald W. Pemberton, Lakewood, Washington; James D. Marchetti, Gig Harbor, Washington; Charles H. Kester, Bellevue, Washinton; Robert H. Pearson, Gig Harbor, Washington; Carole J. Axtell, Puyallup, Washington; Timothy A. Williams, Tacoma, Washington; to acquire voting shares of Pierce County Bancorp, Tacoma, Washington, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Pierce Commercial Bank, Tacoma, Washington.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 7, 2000. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 00-14848 Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
AIBI C IDIEIFIGI B I~IJIKI’I M INIoIPIQI R IsITlul vlvvl X I¥

1

2

3

5

1.~3

1.~4

1.~5

1~6

1.~7

18

19

2O

21

22

24

25

27

31

RHS #

533373

Incident Report

and First Aid, Reportable Vehicle Incident & Out of Service Review

[] Incident

[] Near Miss

PSL: [PE-Frac~Acid

Primary Incident Type

[] Injury/Illness

[] Vehicle

[] Environmental

[] Property/Equip Damage

[] External *NOV or Citation

Incident Type (Check any that apply)

[] Radiation Involved

[] Explosives Involved

Location: [Pampa

Secondary Incident Type

[] Injury/Illness

[] Environmental

[] Property/Equip Damage

[] External *NOV or Citation

* Notice of Violation

Description of activity that was occurring prior to incident:

Pumping stage 7 on 8 stage horizantal frac.

Date and Time Information

Date Time

Occurrence Date & Time: 30-Nov-09 5:00

Reported Date & Time: 30-Nov-09 8:00

Sales Order #:

Customer: Chesapeake

Lease & Well #: Ruby Lee 102H

City:

County: Wheeler

State: ~Texa~s -

Description of incident:

HRB went down as a result of fabco failure and had to be rigged down to hook up another blender. During the rig down process 450 gal of FR water was spilled on location. After the job was complete, arrangements were made in

cooperation with the customer to clean up the spill with a vacuum truck and take to disposal.

Resulting from incident review, what is the root cause & corrective action to mitigate recurrence:

Root Cause: With no hydraulic power, the crew could not blow the fluid out of the blender. Corrective Action: The crew will work with the customer to determine if a vacuum truck can be made available to empty the blender before

rigging it down or contain the spill for clean up after the job.

Behavior Based Analysis

At Risk Behavior 1

At Risk Behavior 2

At Risk Behavior 3

Action Items

Review incident with frac supervisors and council employees to work with customer to help prevent or contain fluid when rigging down equipment.

i L L J Responsible Person Target Date

Chris Estes 5-Dec-09

Report Prepared By: John Ebersole Date: 12-Dec-~9

&[FILE]

HESI300324
AB

Baroid Drilling Fluids

Baroid Surface Solutions

Business Development

Oementing

Oompletion Tools

Drill Bits & Services

PE-Coiled Tubing

PE-Frac~Acid

PE-Nitrogen

PE-HWO

Pinnacle

Software & Asset Solutions

Sperry-LWD/MWD

Sperry-Directional Drilling

~VPS-Cased Hole

~VPS-Open Hole

~VPS-Tubing Conveyed

Alderson

Alvarado

Burns Flat

Duncan

Elk City

Fort Smith

Hugoton

Jacksboro

Liberal

Magnet Cove

Oklahoma City

Pampa

Pauls Valley

Pocasset

Searcy/Kinsett

Special Services

Woodward

&[FILE]

HESI300325
&[FILE]

HESI300326
&[FILE]

HESI300327
Itemization of Costs

Vendor 

Invoice 

Date Description of Cost Cost

Veritext 10/24/2022 Interpreter - Plaintiff first deposition $300 

Veritext 10/27/2022 Plaintiff first deposition transcript $457.50 

Veritext 11/29/2022 Interpreter - Plaintiff second deposition $300 

Veritext 12/10/2022 Plaintiff second deposition transcript $440.65 

Veritext 5/15/2023

Interpreter for May 9, 2023 evidentiary 

hearing $340.00 

Veritext 6/13/2023 Transcript for May 9, 2023 hearing $56.70 

Daughters Reporting 

Inc. 1/31/2023 Elena Valdes deposition transcript $823.40 

Daughters Reporting 

Inc. 2/14/2023 Manual Comes deposition transcript $386.40 

Daughters Reporting 

Inc. 2/15/2023 Noel Leon deposition transcript $450.80 

Daughters Reporting 

Inc. 2/23/2023 Susan deposition transcript $663 

Daughters Reporting 

Inc. 2/24/2023 Francisco Baldelomar deposition transcript $68.40 

Daughters Reporting 

Inc. 2/24/2023 Jerome Nasso deposition transcript $340.40 

Daughters Reporting 

Inc. 2/27/2023 Christopher De Moya deposition transcript $349.60 

Daughters Reporting 

Inc. 3/7/2023 Carlos Cardona deposition transcript $289.80 

Daughters Reporting 

Inc. 3/22/2023 Elena Valdes second deposition transcript $258.75 

$5,525 

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM Document 114-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2023 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-10   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-10   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 2 of 2