alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit


32.1








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS


ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George R. Lefevre,
CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Dated:
May 20,
2008                                                                           By:  /s/ George R.
Lefevre


George R.
Lefevre CEO
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1662. GEOFFREY L. GRAY v. JAMES BARROW HOLLOWAY, SR.

In August 2016, plaintiffs Geoffrey L. Gray and Griffin Stephen Stocks, III,

filed a complaintseeking variousforms of equitable relief, including the appointment

of a receiver for two defendant corporations. Shortly thereafter, the trial court entered

an order appointing a temporary receiver and imposing a temporary restraining order

(“TRO”), and it subsequentlyentered another order extending the TRO “indefinitely.” 

In September 2016, defendant James Barrow Holloway, Sr., filed a motion

seeking to (1) dismissthe complaintfor failure to add an indispensable party (Stephen

G. Bacon, Jr.); (2) alternatively, add Bacon as a party-defendant; (3) dissolve the

TRO; and (4) disqualify the receiver. The trial court did not immediately rule on this

motion.

In August 2017, the court entered an order discharging the receiver and

ordering him to be paid.1In November 2017, the court appointed a new interim

receiver. In December 2017, the court entered orders adding Bacon as a partydefendant, requiring Bacon to interplead certain funds, and resolving various

discovery disputes. 

In December 2018, the trial court entered an order resolving Holloway’s

September 2016 motion. Although styled as an “Order Dismissing Plaintiffs’

Complaint and Temporary Restraining Order,” the order did not, in fact dismiss the

complaint;rather, it only dissolved the TRO issued in August 2016. Plaintiff Gray has

1

 Defendant Holloway filed a direct appeal from that order, but we dismissed

the appeal as interlocutory. See Case No. A18A0867 (dismissed Jan. 11, 2018).

April 25, 2019
filed this direct appeal from that order.

“The policy of the Appellate Practice Act is against multiple appeals and

piecemeal litigation. Direct appeals are generally authorized from lower court orders

that are final, meaning that there are no issues remaining to be resolved in the lower

court.” Mays v. Rancine-Kinchen, 291 Ga. 283, 283-284 (729 SE2d 321) (2012)

(citations and punctuation omitted); see also OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). The order that

plaintiff Gray seeks to appeal was not final because it did not resolve all claims and

issues, and the case appears to remain pending below. Accordingly, Holloway was

required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a

certificate of immediate review from the trial court – to appeal at this juncture. See

OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); see also Eidson v. Croutch, 337 Ga. App. 542, 543-544 (788

SE2d 129) (2016). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct

appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/25/2019
Locatfon: General Shale

.. Sprl,og 

### CJty, TN "

• 

### Nutnber

14eeo Rate, 

### Jblhr arotnetric Pressure, in. Hg

**-~**........ Correction Factor

·

fice Calibration 

### Value 

### Meter Vollune, fl 3 

### Meter Ternpemture, °F Meter 

### Temperature, 0 

### R

**n,nar ~J<r**  Orifice 

### Pressure,

**in ~**  

### WC olu1ne H20 

### Collected, mL 

### Nozzle Dian1eter, in

"\ .Area of Nozzle, 

### rt• Filterable PM Mass, mg

**Hva r02c~n**  

### dlloride Mass) 

### ug Fluoride Mass,
Standard Meter 

### Volutne, f't 3 Standard Water 

### Voltune1' 0 3 Moisture 

### Fraction Measured oistw"e fraction 

### @ Saturation 

### Fraction \t1eter Pressure, in Hg 

### Olume at No12le;, ft 3 

### Isokinetic Santpling 

### Rate:. (%)

. .,. ... Calibration 

### Check Val +/- 5%
Jlterable

**P~l** Concentration, grainldscf



### ·- · e PM Emission Rate, lblhr ydrogen 

### Chloride Concentration, pptnvd 

### ydrogen Chloride 

### Emission Rate, 

### lblhr
""'"'&. 

### Chloride Emission Factor, lblton ydrogen fluoride Concentration, ppnwd

**·~··** 

### Fluoride Enussion Rate, lb/br Fluoride Etnission Factor, 

### lb/ton 

# Emission Calculations

Source: 

### Tuaoel Kiln Bagbouse Project 

### No.: 2012-0117--001 Rtml 07/10112 

### 8 :4 2AM 9 :45AM 

### 60.0 INPUT DATA (FR) 23,800 (Pb) 28

.66 (Y) 1.011 (MI 

### @) 1.994 (Vm) 47.689 (Trn) 73. I (Tm) 533.1 (illi) 2.217 (Vlc) 70

. 5

(Dn) 0.302 (An) (Mn) (Mact>

(VnJStd) (V\VStd) (BWSmsd)

(BWSsat) (BWS) {Ptn) 0.00050 

### 0.8 340 390 flCDATA 46.003

3.318 0.067 11.429 0.067 28.82 (Vn) 80.880 (I) 

### 100.2 -O.S ONCALCULA 

### (C,) 0.0003 (PMR) 3.9E-02 (CHctp) 1.7E-Ol (ERHCr) 

### I. 7E..02 (EFHCJ) 1.4£.03



### (Cw.,) 3

**.6E~O** 

### I

**(E~)** 

### l.9E-02 (EFm:) 1.6E

.. 03 

### Run2 07/10/12 10:18 AM 

### 11:22 AM
23,800



### 28

. 66

1.0 II 1.994 52.159 82

. 3 542

.3 2.689

82.4 0

. 302 0.00050 0.5 

### 400 460
50

.093

3

. 879 0.072 10.975

0.072 28.86 88.151 

### 99.8 -0.7 0.0002 2.5E-02

1,9£-01 2.0E-02

1.7£

.. 03 3.9E-Ol 2

. 3E-02

1.9F.-03 Run3 07/10/12 12:00 PM



### 1:05PM 60 23,800

28

.66 LOll 1

. 994 53.541 

### 82

. 8

**542 8**  2

. 806

80.2 0.302 0.00050 

### 0.9 320 420 50.804

3.775 0.069 1J.042 

### 0.069 28.87 89.197 98.5 

### -1.5
0.0003 4.5E-02

1.5£-01 1.6£-02 

### 1.3£·03 3.5E-01 

### 2.JE

.. 02

1.8E

..03 

## ...

... ..



## ... 60 23,800

28 .6 6

1.011 1.994 51.330 79.4 

### S39.4 2

. 571

11.1 0

. 302 0.00050 0

. 7 353 423 48.967

3.657 0

.069 11.148 0.069 28.8.5 86.076 

### 99.5

-0.9 0.0002 3.6E

.. 02 l,7E-01 1.7E-02 1.5£

..03 3.7E-Ol 2.1E-02

1.8E-03 

# \\
IJNITED STA TES DISTR ICT COU RT

SO UTH ERN D ISTRICT O F FLO RIDA

CASE N O.

In the M atter of the Search of

M ar-a-taago

l l00 S. Ocean Blvd.

Palm Beach, FL 33480

. /

ORD ER G M N TIN G M O TIO N TO A PPEAR '

'AtlJZ4c' V1C ,f CONSENT TO DESIGNATION Ae REQUEST TO

ELEC TRO NICA LLY RECEIVE NO TICES O F ELECTR OM C FILIN G

'ITIIS CAUSE having com e before the Court on the M otion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for

M . Evan Corcpran, Conseht to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive N otices of

Electronic Filing (the liM otion'), pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer

R evi, ew, and Discipline of Attom eys in the United States District Court for the Southez'n District

of Florida and Section 2B of the CW ECF A dm inistrative Procedtlres. This Court having

considered the motion and a11 other relevant factors, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

The M otion is GRANTED. M . Evan Corcoran may appear and participate'in this action

on behalf of M ovant Donald J. Trump. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of all

electronic filings to M. Evan Corcorad, at ecorcorM @silve= rlompson.com.

DON E AND ORDERED in Cham bers at . Floridw this

day of . 2022.

United States District Judge

Copies furnished to: A11 Counsel of Record

22-cv-81294-AMC

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 5-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of VoIP, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A
      for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Staats, Chief
      Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Date:
                October 11, 2007*/s/
                Robert Staats*Robert
                StaatsChief
                Accounting Officer
§ 401.37 Mooring at tie-up walls. ( a ) Upon arrival at a lock, a vessel awaiting instructions to advance shall moor at the tie-up wall, close up to the designated limit or approach sign or to the ship preceding it, whichever is specified by the traffic controller or an officer.
( b ) Crew members being put ashore on landing booms and handling mooring lines on tie-up walls shall wear approved personal flotation devices.
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended and secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471)
[39 FR 10900, Mar. 22, 1974, as amended at 47 FR 51122, Nov. 12, 1982; 65 FR 52914, Aug. 31, 2000; 70 FR 12972, Mar. 17, 2005; 73 FR 9954, Feb. 25, 2008; 81 FR 13746, Mar. 15, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-81294-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

________________________________/

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF FILING

The United States of America hereby files its Response Brief to the Special Master on 

Global Issues, attached as Attachment A. As indicated in Dkt. No. 177, the brief was 

provided on November 12, 2022, to the Special Master and to counsel of record.

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

MATTHEW G. OLSEN

Assistant Attorney General

By: /s/

JAY I. BRATT 

Chief

JULIE A. EDELSTEIN

Deputy Chief

STEPHEN MARZEN

Trial Attorney

Counterintelligence and Export Control Section 

National Security Division

Department of Justice

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 182 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 14, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices of 

Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.

/s/ Julie A. Edelstein

Julie A. Edelstein

Deputy Chief

Counterintelligence and Export Control Section

National Security Division

United States Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20530

Special Bar # A5502949

Tel.: 202-233-0986

Email: julie.a.edelstein@usdoj.gov

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 182 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:22-cv-14303-KMM   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022   Page 1 of 7

Case 2:22-cv-14303-KMM   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022   Page 2 of 7

Case 2:22-cv-14303-KMM   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022   Page 3 of 7

Case 2:22-cv-14303-KMM   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022   Page 4 of 7

Case 2:22-cv-14303-KMM   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022   Page 5 of 7

Case 2:22-cv-14303-KMM   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022   Page 6 of 7

Case 2:22-cv-14303-KMM   Document 1   Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022   Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 21.1

                     List of Subsidiaries of GoAmerica, Inc.










<PAGE>

                          GoAmerica, Inc. Subsidiaries

1.    GoAmerica Communications Corp. (Delaware corporation)
      433 Hackensack Avenue
      Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

2.    GoAmerica Marketing, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
      433 Hackensack Avenue
      Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

3.    Wynd Communications Corporation (California corporation)
      75 Higuera Street, Suite 240
      San Luis Obispo, California 93401

4.    Hotpaper.com, Inc. (Delaware corporation)
      433 Hackensack Avenue
      Hackensack, New Jersey 07601

5.    OutBack Resource Group, Inc. (California corporation)
      3450 Broad Street, Suite 103
      San Luis Obispo, California 93401
§ 955.7 Pleadings. ( a ) *Appellant.* Within 45 days after receipt of notice of docketing of the appeal, the appellant shall file with the Board a complaint setting forth simple, concise and direct statements of each of its claims, alleging the basis, with appropriate reference to contract provisions, for each claim, and the dollar amount claimed. This pleading shall fulfill the generally recognized requirements of a complaint although no particular form or formality is required. Upon the appellant's request or on the Board's own initiative, the appellant's claim, notice of appeal or other document may be deemed to constitute the complaint if in the opinion of the Board the issues before the Board are sufficiently defined.
( b ) *Respondent.* Within 30 days from receipt of said complaint, or the aforesaid notice from the Board, the respondent shall prepare and file with the Board an answer thereto, setting forth simple, concise, and direct statements of the respondent's defenses to each claim asserted by the appellant. This pleading shall fulfill the generally recognized requirements of an answer, and shall set forth any affirmative defenses or counterclaims as appropriate. Should the answer not be filed within the time required, the Board may, in its discretion, enter a general denial on behalf of the respondent, and the appellant shall be so notified.
( c ) *Affirmative claims by the respondent.* Where an appellant has appealed an affirmative claim by the respondent asserted in a final decision by a Postal Service contracting officer, such as a termination for default or a Postal Service claim that a contractor owes the Postal Service money under a contract, the Board may order the respondent to file the complaint as described in § 955.7(a), and the appellant to file the answer as described in § 955.7(b).
[74 FR 20592, May 5, 2009, as amended at 76 FR 37660, June 28, 2011; 80 FR 31304, June 2, 2015]
§ 111.1 Incorporation by reference; Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual. ( a ) Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. ( 1 ) *Subscriptions.* Subscriptions to the Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual can be purchased by the public from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DC 20402-9375.
( 2 ) *Inspection—USPS.* ( i ) Copies of the DMM, both current and previous issues, are available during regular business hours for reference and public inspection at the U.S. Postal Service Library, National Headquarters in Washington, DC. For access contact 202-268-2906.
( ii ) Copies of only the current issue are available during regular business hours for public inspection at area and district offices of the Postal Service and at all post offices, classified stations, and classified branches. The DMM is available for examination on the internet at *https://pe.usps.gov .*
( 3 ) *Inspection—NARA.* You may view this material at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .*
( b ) The Director of the Federal Register approved DMM, updated January 21, 2024, for incorporation by reference as of March 4, 2024.
[85 FR 61609, Sept. 30, 2020, as amended at 87 FR 63425, Oct. 19, 2022; 89 FR 15475, Mar. 4, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5245 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5245

To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to eliminate a limitation 
                              on benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 21, 2000

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to eliminate a limitation 
                              on benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 3(f)(3) of 
the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231b(f)(3)) is amended 
by striking ``(ii) after an annuity has been certified for payment'' 
and all that follows through ``and (iii)'' and inserting ``and (ii)''. 
The amendment made by this Act shall apply with respect to months 
beginning on or after January 1, 1978.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40980

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ENRIQUE QUESADA-LERMA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:05-CR-7-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Enrique Quesada-Lerma (Quesada) appeals his guilty plea

conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute

marijuana. Quesada argues (1) his sentence contravened United

States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and, (2) for the first

time on appeal, that his count three conviction should be

overturned because the statute cited in the indictment, 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(b)(1)(C), purportedly does not criminalize the charged

conduct.
No. 05-40980

-2-

Quesada’s contention that the district court was precluded

from enhancing his sentence based on facts that had not been

either admitted by him or found beyond a reasonable doubt by a

jury is untenable. Post-Booker “[t]he sentencing judge is

entitled to find by a preponderance of the evidence all the facts

relevant to the determination of a Guideline sentencing range and

all facts relevant to the determination of a non-Guidelines

sentence.” United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). 

Quesada’s guilty plea renders his defective indictment claim

waived because “[a] voluntary guilty plea waives all

nonjurisdictional defects in the proceedings against the

defendant,” United States v. Glinsey, 209 F.3d 386, 392 (5th Cir.

2000), and an allegedly defective indictment does not deprive a

district court of jurisdiction. United States v. Cotton, 535

U.S. 625, 631 (2002). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21





SUBSIDIARIES OF DELTA APPAREL, INC.





Listed below are the subsidiaries of Delta Apparel, Inc.:





|    |                                                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | M. J. Soffe, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company.




|    |                                                  
|--- | -------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Junkfood Clothing Company, a Georgia corporation.




|    |                                                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------
|(3) | To The Game, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company.




|    |                                                   
|--- | --------------------------------------------------
|(4) | Art Gun, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company.




|    |                                                      
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------
|(5) | TCX, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company.




|    |                                                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|(6) | Delta Apparel Honduras, S.A., a Honduran sociedad anónima.




|    |                                                                              
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(7) | Delta Campeche, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican sociedad anónima de capital variable.




|    |                                                 
|--- | ------------------------------------------------
|(8) | Delta Cortes, S.A., a Honduran sociedad anónima.




|    |                                                                                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(9) | Campeche Sportswear, S de RL de CV, a Mexican sociedad de responsabilidad de capital variable.




|     |                                                                  
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|(10) | Textiles La Paz, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company.




(11)    Ceiba Textiles, S de RL, a Honduran sociedad de responsabilidad limitada.





(12)     Atled Holding Company Honduras, S de RL, a Honduran sociedad de responsabilidad limitada.





(13)    LaPaz Honduras, S de RL, a Honduran sociedad de responsabilidad limitada.
### Hydrogeologic framework of the coastal plain of Maryland, Delaware, and the District of Columbia

By: D. A. VrobleskyW.B. Fleck

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1404E

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.