alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Credco's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1999 and Condensed 
Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         2,099
<SECURITIES>                                     353
<RECEIVABLES>                                 18,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                     582
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                24,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                       21,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           1
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  24,112
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 499
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   5
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 128
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   93
<INCOME-TAX>                                      33
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               60
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                      60
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        

</TABLE>
APPENDIX A

Responsibility for Consent Decree Obligations after Sale or Transfer of the Facility and Passage of the 180-Day Period of Joint and Several Liability

Section Provision Defendant Retains / Obligation Defendant Relieved / Obligation

does not transfer to new owner or transfers to new owner or operator

operator

IV. CIVIL PENALTY Civil Penally -Mobil shall pay a civil X

penalty of $350,000, plus interest at

1.29 percent per year from the date of

August 21, 2003.

V. COMPLLANCE MEASURES Main Flare Emission Limits X

Monitoring -measure and record the XH2Sconcentration in the field gas atthe Facility in each calendar month atthe inlet to the Main Flare, and shall

continuously measure and record thevolume of gas combusted in the MainFlare.Operation and Maintenance of Flare X

Devices and CompressorsRoot Cause Analysis X

Note: ceases to be required upon

issuance of the final PSD and Title V

permits.

Root Cause Analysis -Corrective X

Action Note: ceases to be required upon

issuance of the final PSD and Title V

permits.

Permitting X X

Apply for the permits within the Comply with ongoing permit

required time frame. requirements.

VI. SUPPLEMENTAL Pay for and complete all obligations XENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT of the SEP.

VII. COMPLIANCE REPORTING Quarterly compliance reports, XAND RECORDKEEPING emission calculations.
VIII. STIPULATED PENALTIES Late or incomplete payment of civil

X

penalty.

VIII. STIPULATED PENALTIES Other provisions related to ongoing

x

(Cont.) compliance.

IX. RIGHT OF ENTRY

x

X. FORCE MAJEURE

x

X. DISPUTE RESOLUTION

X

XI. NOTIFICATION

X
§ 962.9 Responsibilities and authority of presiding officer. ( a ) The Presiding Officer shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceeding is made.
( b ) The Presiding Officer's authority includes, but is not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Establishing, upon adequate notice to all parties, the date and time of the hearing, as well as, in accordance with § 962.7, selecting the hearing site;
( 2 ) Holding conferences, by telephone or in person, to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceeding;
( 3 ) Continuing or recessing the hearing in whole or in part for a reasonable period of time;
( 4 ) Administering oaths and affirmations to witnesses;
( 5 ) Issuing subpoenas, requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of all information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence which the Presiding Officer considers relevant and material to the hearing;
( 6 ) Ruling on all offers, motions, requests by the parties, and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Issuing any notices, orders, or memoranda to the parties concerning the proceedings;
( 8 ) Regulating the scope and timing of discovery;
( 9 ) Regulating the course of the hearing and the conduct of the parties and their representatives;
( 10 ) Examining witnesses;
( 11 ) Receiving, ruling on, excluding, or limiting evidence in order to assure that relevant, reliable and probative evidence is elicited on the issues in dispute, but irrelevant, immaterial or repetitious evidence is excluded;
( 12 ) Deciding cases, upon motion of a party, in whole or in part by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 13 ) Establishing the record in the case; and
( 14 ) Issuing a written initial decision containing findings of fact, conclusions of law, and determinations with respect to whether a penalty or assessment should be imposed, and if so, the amount of such penalty or assessment.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**TridentConference, May 1943 : papers and minutes of meetings
 
epub|mobi| pdf|
 
SuDoc Number:D 5.2:C76/4
Item Number:0315 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001021880
January 28, 2019
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alberto-Culver Company (the company) for the period
ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Cernugel, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ William J. Cernugel                          
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|May 8, 2006
§ 167.15 Modification of schemes. ( a ) A traffic separation scheme or precautionary area described in this part may be permanently amended in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 70003 (92 Stat. 1473), and with international agreements.
( b ) A traffic separation scheme or precautionary area in this part may be temporarily adjusted by the Commandant of the Coast Guard in an emergency, or to accommodate operations which would create an undue hazard for vessels using the scheme or which would contravene Rule 10 of the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972. Adjustment may be in the form of a temporary traffic lane shift, a temporary suspension of a section of the scheme, a temporary precautionary area overlaying a lane, or other appropriate measure. Adjustments will only be made where, in the judgment of the Coast Guard, there is no reasonable alternative means of conducting an operation and navigation safety will not be jeopardized by the adjustment. Notice of adjustments will be made in the appropriate Notice to Mariners and in the Federal Register. Requests by members of the public for temporary adjustments to traffic separation schemes must be submitted 150 days prior to the time the adjustment is desired. Such Requests, describing the interference that would otherwise occur to a TSS, should be submitted to the District Commander of the Coast Guard District in which the TSS is located.
[CGD 81-080, 48 FR 36456, Aug. 11, 1983, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58281, Sept. 18, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5283 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5283

To amend the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act 
to authorize the Federal Trade Commission to issue new rules regulating 
              telemarketing firms, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2000

  Mr. Salmon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act 
to authorize the Federal Trade Commission to issue new rules regulating 
              telemarketing firms, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telemarketing Victims Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION RULES.

    Section 3(a) of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse 
Prevention Act (15 U.S.C. 6102) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(4) The Commission shall include in such rules respecting 
        other abusive telemarketing acts or practices--
                    ``(A) a requirement that telemarketers shall notify 
                consumers who are called that they have the right to be 
                placed on either the telemarketer's do-not-call list or 
                the appropriate State do-not-call list; and
                    ``(B) a requirement that telemarketers shall obtain 
                and reconcile with their own on a regular basis the 
                appropriate State list.''.

SEC. 3. STUDY.

    The Federal Trade Commission shall conduct a study of the 
violations of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention 
Act by telemarketers especially of repeated violations by a single 
telemarketer and of the provisions for penalizing telemarketers for 
such violations, including new provisions which would allow appropriate 
Federal action against telemarketers. The Commission shall complete the 
study within one year of the date of enactment of this Act and report 
its findings to the Congress.
                                 <all>
```
§ 95.035 Reasonable cause for directing a chemical test. ( a ) Only a law enforcement officer or a marine employer may direct an individual operating a vessel to undergo a chemical test when reasonable cause exists. Reasonable cause exists when: ( 1 ) The individual was directly involved in the occurrence of a marine casualty as defined in Chapter 61 of Title 46, United States Code, or
( 2 ) The individual is suspected of being in violation of the standards in §§ 95.020 or 95.025.
( b ) When an individual is directed to undergo a chemical test, the individual to be tested must be informed of that fact and directed to undergo a test as soon as is practicable.
( c ) When practicable, a marine employer should base a determination of the existence of reasonable cause, under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, on observation by two persons.
[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47532, Dec. 14, 1987; CGD 84-099, 53 FR 13117, Apr. 1, 1988]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7867

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WESLEY JERMAINE OWENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cr-00026-BR-1)

Submitted: April 29, 2020 Decided: May 12, 2020

Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wesley Jermaine Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wesley Jermaine Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion and denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2018). We dismiss in part and affirm in part.

The portion of the order denying § 2255 relief is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2018). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2018). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. 

See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Owens has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Owens’ 

motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as to the denial of § 2255 

relief.

Turning to the portion of the order denying the petition for a writ of error coram 

nobis, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Owens, No. 5:06-cr-00026-BR1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART,

AFFIRMED IN PART
#### § 3035.106 Sufficiency of information.

If, after review of the information submitted pursuant to this part, the Commission determines additional information is necessary to enable it to evaluate whether competitive products will be in compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), it may, in its discretion, require the Postal Service to provide additional information as deemed necessary.

[72 FR 63697, Nov. 9, 2007. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
2/22/24, 11:35 AM Rescheduled! National Service Criminal History Check Training Opportunity

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USCNCS/bulletins/38ac7da 1/2

Office of Monitoring

Feb. 22, 2024

We only use cookies that are necessary for this site to function to provide you with the best experience. The controller of this site may choose to place supplementary cookies

to support additional functionality such as support analytics, and has an obligation to disclose these cookies. Learn more in our Cookie Statement.

Rescheduled! National Service Criminal History Check Training Opportunity

AmeriCorps sent this bulletin at 02/22/2024 10:01 AM EST

Rescheduled! National Service Criminal

History Check Training Opportunity

Rescheduled: Reporting Subrecipient Cost-Based

Disallowance

We are reviewing the process and guidance for commissions and other prime grantees

with subrecipients to report offset subrecipient costs disallowed on the basis of National

Service Criminal History Check noncompliance. We invite grant recipients with

subrecipients to attend an information session to review the draft guidance and provide

feedback. This session was originally scheduled for Wednesday, Feb. 28.

Reporting Subrecipient National Service Criminal History Check Disallowance:

Process Review for Prime Grant Recipients

Thursday, March 7, 2:30-3:30 p.m. ET

Register

A recording of the session will be available on Litmos. If you have any questions about

this session, you may contact chc@americorps.gov and copy your portfolio manager.

Manage preferences / AmeriCorps.gov

We sent this email to Email Address on behalf of AmeriCorps.
2/22/24, 11:35 AM Rescheduled! National Service Criminal History Check Training Opportunity

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USCNCS/bulletins/38ac7da 2/2

Subscribe to updates from AmeriCorps

Email Address e.g. name@example.com

Subscribe

Share Bulletin

Powered by

Privacy Policy | Cookie Statement | Help
§ 83.12 Sailing vessels (Rule 12). ( a ) When two sailing vessels are approaching one another, so as to involve risk of collision, one of them shall keep out of the way of the other as follows: ( i ) When each has the wind on a different side, the vessel which has the wind on the port side shall keep out of the way of the other.
( ii ) When both have the wind on the same side, the vessel which is to windward shall keep out of the way of the vessel which is to leeward.
( iii ) If a vessel with the wind on the port side sees a vessel to windward and cannot determine with certainty whether the other vessel has the wind on the port or on the starboard side, she shall keep out of the way of the other.
( b ) For the purpose of this Rule, the windward side shall be deemed to be the side opposite to that on which the mainsail is carried or, in the case of a square-rigged vessel, the side opposite to that on which the largest fore-and-aft sail is carried.
### Study Title Copper Transport and Fate Simulations and Evaluation of Estimated Environmental Concentrations for Copper-Based Antimicrobial Compounds

Authors Mark Velleux, Paul Paquin, Aaron Redman, and Robert Santore

Prepared By HydroQual Inc.

1200 MacArthur Boulevard Mahwah, NJ 07430

Prepared For American Chemistry Council Copper Task Force 700 Second Street, NE Washington, DC 20002

Report Date December 21, 2009

Notice to Readers – August 3, 2011

Watershed simulations described in t he report were performed using the T wodimensional R unoff, E rosion, and Ex port (TREX) watershed model (Velleux, 2005; Velleux et al. 2006; Velleux et al. 2008) becaus e of its abilities to simulate chemical transport at the watershed scale and repres ent a diverse landscape with spatiallyvariable chemical inputs. The model name was changed to T wo-dimensional

E xposure and R ainfall-R unoff A nalysis (TERRA) in June 2011. This name change

was made to avoid confusion with the Terrestri al Residue Exposure (T-REX) model that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Pest icide Programs (OPP) uses to estimate pesticide concentrati ons on avian and mammalian food items. Although the model name has been changed, t he model is still referred to as “TREX” throughout the report as well as in the m odel computer code, inputs, and outputs.
#### § 964.12 Computation of time.

A designated period of time under these rules means calendar days, excludes the day the period begins, and includes the last day of the period unless the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, in which case the period runs until the close of business on the next business day.
#### § 3050.27 Workers' Compensation Report.

The Workers' Compensation Report, including summary workpapers, shall be provided by March 1 of each year.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 529

To require the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to approve a permit

required for importation of certain wildlife items taken in Tajikistan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. BARCIA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To require the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to

approve a permit required for importation of certain

wildlife items taken in Tajikistan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMIT FOR IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN WILD4 LIFE ITEMS TAKEN IN TAJIKISTAN.

5 Notwithstanding the fact that the information re6 quired under applicable laws and regulations for the

7 United States Fish and Wildlife Service to allow importa8 tion of wildlife items taken in Tajikistan in 1995 cannot
2

•HR 529 IH

1 be obtained, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service

2 shall approve permit application 827629.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ENDO

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles A. Rowland, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                            
|------ |  | ---------------------------
|       |  | /S/ Charles A. Rowland, Jr.
|Name:  |  | Charles A. Rowland, Jr.    
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer    
|Date:  |  | February 26, 2008          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be
retained by, Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 114.30 Revocation.

Permits may be revoked by the issuing official for failure on the part of the permittee to comply with any of the conditions therein, or where the structures or other work constitute an unreasonable obstruction to navigation or to operations of the United States in the interest of navigation or flood control.

[CGD 82-006, 47 FR 36640, Aug. 23, 1982]