alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RETURN OF SERVICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 District of Florida

HENRY PINTO

PROCESS SERVER CPS # 2351

Statewide Process Service, Inc

5727 NW 7th Street

Suite 317

Miami, FL 33126

(786) 512-5440

Our Job Serial Number: OCH-2022001489

Copyright © 1992-2022 Database Services, Inc. - Process Server's Toolbox V8.2h

Case Number: 22-CV-81294-AMC

Plaintiff:

DONALD J. TRUMP

vs.

Defendant:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

For:

IFRAH LAW

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, Nw

SUITE 650

WASHINGTON, DC 20006

Received by Statewide Process Service, Inc on the 29th day of August, 2022 at 10:43 am to be served on

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O U.S. ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

FLORIDA, 99 NE 4TH STREET, THIRD FLOOR, MIAMI, FL 33132.

I, HENRY PINTO, do hereby affirm that on the 29th day of August, 2022 at 1:15 pm, I:

served a GOVERNMENT AGENCY by delivering a true copy of the SUMMONS, CIVIL COVER SHEET, MOTION 

FOR JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT AND ADDITIONAL RELIEF, ORDER AND EXHIBITSwith the date and time of 

service along with my initials and server # endorsed thereon by me, to: H. RON DAVIDSON as ASSISTANT US 

ATTORNEY for UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O U.S. ATTORNEYS OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN 

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, and informed said person of the contents therein, in compliance with State Statutes.

I certify that I am over the age of 18, have no interest in the above action, and am a Process Server, in good

standing, in the judicial circuit in which the process was served. Under penalty of perjury, I declare that I have

read the foregoing Affidavit of Service and that the facts stated in it are true to the best of my knowledge.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/29/2022 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The following certification accompanies the issuer's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB and is not filed, as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986
dated June 5, 2003.

In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Bancorp (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Larry A. Dreyer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter J. Johnson, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


/s/ Larry A. Dreyer                           /s/ Peter J. Johnson
-----------------------------                 ---------------------
Larry A. Dreyer                               Peter J. Johnson
President and Chief                           Sr. VP/Treasurer and Chief
Executive Officer                             Financial Officer
September 17, 2004                            September 17, 2004
The ABA Public Contract Law Section Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee, 

the ABA National Conference of Administrative Law Judiciary’s ADR Committee, 

and the Interagency ADR Working Group Contracts and Procurement Section 

Present –

ADR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS 

Cost: No charge! 

Date: June 24, 2014 

Time: Noon to 2:00 P.M. (EDT)

Place: McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP

Founders Conference Room 

1900 K Street NW 

Washington, DC 20006 

(Near Metro Stations at Farragut West (Yellow or Blue Lines) 

and Farragut North (Red Line))

For those attending in person, sandwiches and drinks will be available beginning at 12:00 pm 

for $10.00, payable in cash at the in-person location. The program will begin at 12:30 PM. 

Information about the program may be accessed at the ADR Committee’s website: 

http://www.abanet.org/dch/committee.cfm?com=PC801000. 

A dial-in option is available. Telephone numbers and passcodes will be distributed a day or 

two before the event to those who register online. Any number of listeners can participate 

at a dial-in location. 

Presentation Description Our Guest Speakers

This program will discuss settlement 

agreements for contract disputes and 

protests resolved using alternative dispute 

resolution (ADR). Topics will include the 

perspectives of neutrals, judges, 

government attorneys, and private sector 

participants regarding:

 Drafting

 Organizational approval processes

 Negotiation strategies

 Language

 Non-negotiable items

 Mandatory clauses and more!

Moderator:

Don Yenovkian, Esq.

Fluor Corporation

Panelists:

 Hon. Marian Horn

 Judge, U.S. Ct. of Fed. Claims

 E. Sanderson Hoe, Esq.

 Partner, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLC

 Admin. Judge (ret.) Carol Park-Conroy

JAMS Mediator

 Bryant Snee, Deputy Director, 

Commercial Lit. Branch, Civil Division,

U.S. Dept. of Justice

 

Online registration closes June 20, 2014. Click here to register: 

http://www.abanet.org/dch/committee.cfm?com=PC801000

Registration deadline is 

Noon (EDT) on 

June 20, 2014! 

Don’t delay!
________________________________________________________________ Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000626 11-MAR-2014 SCWC-12-0000626 09:58 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. ALEXANDER H. LI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant

_________________________________________________________________ CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000626; Case No. 1DTA-12-00941)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Del Rosario, in place of Acoba, J., recused) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Alexander H. Li’s application for writ of certiorari filed February 13, 2014, was filed more than thirty days after the filing of the ICA’s January 8, 2014, judgment on appeal. The application is untimely, and thus, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction. SeeHawai ' i Revised Statutes § 602-59(c) (Supp. 2011); Hawai ' i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40.1(a)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of certiorari is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, March 11, 2014.
R. Patrick McPherson for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Brian R. Vincent for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Dexter D. Del Rosario
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7373

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

REGINALD LAMONT USSERY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:94-cr-00095-F)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 5, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Lamont Ussery, Appellant Pro Se. Felice McConnell

Corpening, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Ussery, No. 5:94-cr-00095-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 2007). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 70943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28538]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

SES Performance Review Board--Appointment of Members

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the 
Performance Review Board of the Equal Employment Opportunity 
Commission.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa M. Williams, Chief Human Capital 
Officer, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street 
NE., Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663-4306.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Publication of the Performance Review Board 
(PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews 
and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance 
by the supervisor, and makes recommendations to the Chair, EEOC, with 
respect to performance ratings, pay level adjustments and performance 
awards.
    The following are the names and titles of executives appointed to 
serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 12-month term, 
which begins on November 18, 2013.

PRB Chair

    Mr. Dexter R. Brooks, Director, Federal Sector Programs, Office of 
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Members

    Mr. Kevin J. Berry, Director, New York District Office, Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission;
    Ms. Katherine E. Bissell, Deputy Solicitor for Regional 
Enforcement, Department of Labor;
    Ms. Kathryn A. Ellis, Assistant General Counsel, Division of 
Educational Equity and Research, and Agency Dispute Resolution 
Specialist, Department of Education;
    Ms. Gwendolyn Y. Reams, Associate General Counsel, Equal Employment 
Opportunity Commission;

Alternate

    Ms. Delner Franklin-Thomas, Director, Birmingham District Office, 
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

    By the direction of the Commission.

    Dated: November 15, 2013.
Jacqueline A. Berrien,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2013-28538 Filed 11-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
ADR LUNCHTIME SERIES PRESENTATION

Measuring Skills that Enhance Workplace Interaction

This workshop will present the concepts used by conflict management 

professionals to resolve disputes in which dysfunctional interactions interfere

with employees’ ability to accomplish their agency’s mission. The concepts have

been incorporated into a scientific test whereby disputing employees can be

characterized by how they express themselves in disputes with coworkers.

Through understanding these categories, dispute professionals can coach

disputants individually or in groups. We will discuss strategies for using these

classifications to plan for successful resolution and a productive work

environment. The workshop will also include suggestions on how to apply these

concepts to family and community disputes. 

Speaker: Dr. Peter R. Maida

 5335 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 440

 Washington, D.C. 20015

Presented by the Interagency ADR Working Group, Workplace Conflict 

Management Section in coordination with the Department of Energy

Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2015

Time: Noon - 1:30 pm EST (Please allow extra time for security procedures)

Location: U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave, SW, Room GJ-015

(DOE Forrestal Small Auditorium)

Washington, D.C. 20585

Travel by Metro: Green and Yellow Line - L'Enfant Plaza station (exit to 

Maryland Avenue) OR Orange and Blue Line - Smithsonian station (exit to 

Holocaust Museum/Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

To attend in person, everyone, including federal employees with an HSPD-12 

government ID badge, must register by email to cindy.mazur@dhs.gov and 

provide name, citizenship, and agency/employer by October 27, 2015. You do 

not need to register to call-in or participate online. 

To join the online event and follow the presentation in real time go to:

https://usdoe.webex.com/usdoe/onstage/g.php?d=990918394&t=a then click

"Join Now" and enter Event Password Adr1234 (it’s case sensitive). Then follow 

the instructions to join the audio portion. To listen only via teleconference, 

please call 1-650-479-3208 and use access code: 990 918 394. Please

disregard the prompt for an Attendee ID by pressing # sign. To submit 

questions to the speaker during the program, please use online chat or email 

elisabeth.bissell@fema.dhs.gov. Materials for this presentation will be posted at 

http://www.adr.gov several days before the program.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I,Robert L. Saxton, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Alliance Gaming Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)   disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

 

a)   all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: February 9, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Robert L. Saxton                                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Saxton                                        |
| Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial |
| Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)    |

 

----
Wyoming Nitrate Contribution to Rocky Mountain Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total ROMO1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 24 WY 0.0151292 3.75E-05 0.0099458 0.0006208 0.0034292 0.0291625 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Nitrate at Rocky Mountain = 0.03 divided by 0.3, or 10% Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total ROMO1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 23 WY 0.0198783 4.78E-05 0.0122957 0.0007783 0.0043739 0.0373739 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Nitrate at Rocky Mountain = 0.04 divided by 0.5, or 8%
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY C. BONTEMPS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

SOTAK, Dr.; SMITH, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-16275

D.C. No. 

2:09-cv-02115-MCE-EFB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 15, 2017

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and WHALEY,**

District Judge.

 

Appellant Gregory Bontemps, a California State prisoner, appeals the district

court’s decision revoking his right to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 action against two prison physicians, Defendants-Appellees Drs. 

FILED

OCT 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Robert H. Whaley, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation.
Sotak and Smith. The magistrate judge found, and the district court agreed, that

Bontemps had filed three cases in federal court while incarcerated that were

dismissed because they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted, and thus had three “strikes” under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act, disqualifying him from IFP status unless he could allege an

imminent danger of serious physical harm. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff’s

argument that a dismissal for failure to prosecute can never count as a strike under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) is foreclosed by our recent decision in Harris v. Mangum, 863

F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2017). The record reflects, however, that at least one of the

dismissals cannot be characterized as having been made for any of the grounds set

forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The dismissal in Bontemps v. Kramer, 2:06-Civ02580 (E.D. Cal.) (Kramer II), was ordered after Bontemps received the only relief

he sought in the action, and the case was therefore dismissed as moot. The court

was without jurisdiction over any claim. A dismissal for mootness was not a

dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Moore v. Maricopa Cty. Sheriff’s Office, 657 F.3d 890, 893-

94 (9th Cir. 2011) (dismissals for lack of jurisdiction do not count as strikes).

2
The district court’s order revoking Bontemps’s IFP status must be

VACATED and the matter REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with

this opinion. Appellees shall bear the costs on appeal.

3
§ 3011.300 Eligibility for access to non-public materials. ( a ) The following persons may access non-public materials without an order issued pursuant to § 3011.301(e): ( 1 ) Members of the Commission;
( 2 ) Commission employees, including Public Representatives, carrying out their official responsibilities;
( 3 ) Non-employees who have executed appropriate non-disclosure agreements (such as contractors, attorneys, or subject matter experts), assisting the Commission in carrying out its duties;
( 4 ) Reviewing courts and their staffs; and
( 5 ) Court reporters, stenographers, or persons operating audio or video recording equipment for such court reporters or stenographers at hearings or depositions.
( b ) No person involved in competitive decision-making for any individual or entity that might gain competitive advantage from using non-public materials shall be granted access to non-public materials. Involved in competitive decision-making includes consulting on marketing or advertising strategies, pricing, product research and development, product design, or the competitive structuring and composition of bids, offers or proposals. It does not include rendering legal advice or performing other services that are not directly in furtherance of activities in competition with an individual or entity having a proprietary interest in the protected material.
( c ) Any person not described in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may request access to non-public materials as described in § 3011.301, for the purpose of aiding participation in a pending Commission proceeding (including compliance proceedings) or aiding the initiation of a proceeding before the Commission.
[83 FR 31281, July 3, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 9642, Feb. 19, 2020; 86 FR 48503, Aug. 31, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 469 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 469

   Providing for a protocol for nonpartisan confirmation of judicial 
                               nominees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 2008

 Mr. Specter submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
               the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for a protocol for nonpartisan confirmation of judicial 
                               nominees.

Whereas judicial nominations have long been the subject of controversy and delay 
        in the United States Senate, particularly over the last twenty years;
Whereas, in the past, the controversy over judicial nominees has occurred 
        regardless of which political parties controlled the White House and the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, in the current Congress the controversy over judicial nominees 
        continues: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROTOCOL FOR NONPARTISAN CONFIRMATION OF JUDICIAL NOMINEES.

    (a) Timetables.--
    (1) Committee timetables.--The Chairman of the Committee on the 
Judiciary, in collaboration with the Ranking Member, shall--
    (A) establish a timetable for hearings for nominees to the United 
States district courts, courts of appeals, and Supreme Court, to occur 
within 30 days after the names of such nominees have been submitted to 
the Senate by the President; and
    (B) establish a timetable for action by the full Committee to occur 
within 30 days after the hearings, and for reporting out nominees to 
the full Senate.
    (2) Senate timetables.--The majority leader shall establish a 
timetable for action by the full Senate to occur within 30 days after 
the Committee on the Judiciary has reported out the nominations.
    (b) Extension of Timetables.--
    (1) Committee extensions.--The Chairman of the Committee on the 
Judiiciary, with notice to the Ranking Member, may extend by a period 
not to exceed 30 days, the time for action by the Committee for cause, 
such as the need for more investigation or additional hearings.
    (2) Senate extensions.--
    (A) In General.--The majority leader, with notice to the minority 
leader, may extend by a period not to exceed 30 days, the time for 
floor action for cause, such as the need for more investigation or 
additional hearings.
    (B) Recess Period.--Any day of a recess period of the Senate shall 
not be included in the extension period described under subparagraph 
(A).
                                 <all>
```