alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 24,2015 

In The 

C!tnurl nf Appeals 

lJiiftil ilistrict nf Wcxas at ilallas 

No. 05-15-00636-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.A., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court 

Rockwall County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1-15-76 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

This is an appeal from the trial court's April 28, 2015 and June 10, 2015 orders denying 

appellant's motions to recuse the trial judge. Because no final judgment has been entered, and an 

order denying a motion to recuse is appealable only upon final judgment, we directed appellant 

to file a letter brief addressing our jurisdiction. See TEX. R. Civ. P. 18aU)(1)(A); Ogletree v. 

Matthews, 262 S. W.3d 316, 319 n.l (Tex. 2007) ("Texas appellate courts have jurisdiction only 

over final orders or judgments unless a statute permits an interlocutory appeal."). Although 

appellant complied, she has failed to show the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

150363F.P05 /Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE RECEIVED IN ~OURT OF /\PPEALS, 5th OIST. 

DEC 1 1 Z015 

LISA MATZ 

CLERK. 5th DISTRICT 
C!t:nurf nf J\pp£aln 

Yiftij ilintrid nf W£xan at llallan 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.A., A CHILD On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District 

Court, Rockwall County, Texas 

No. 05-15-00636-CV Trial Court Cause No. 1-15-76. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. 

Justices Evans and Stoddart participating. 

In accordance with this Court's opinion ofthis date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

We ORDER appellees David Rohlf, Michael Goodman, James Andrew Aikens, Nancy 

Aikens, Gary Arey, Susan Wright, Ann Marie Jordan, Shawn Richards, Carece Buraqck, Breena 

Nichols Rhodes, and Matthew Joseph Aikens recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from 

appellant Sherry Rhodes. 

Judgment entered November 24, 2015. 

-2-
Order entered November 24,2015 

In The 

QCourt of appeals 

.1'tftb j~Btsttttt of QJ:exas at j~Ballas 

No. 05-15-00636-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.A., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court 

Rockwall County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1-15-76 

ORDER 

In light ofthe Court's opinion of this date, we DENY all pending motions as moot. 

Is/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
f.exas at Dallas 

s Building 

ite 200 

!''4 TEX.I\S 

C};r::tt ?5:J.) 

25 NO\i' 'lS 

9 L 

CASE: 05-15-00636-CV 

MATT . -

#198H 

..i., ,1'---._J.. = 

NOT 

.1-..L. :l-'<-. ..\., 

f', ·- r,J .. T f) 

n;: \ T lf;= /i_R :, 

JN.l\S_E ;o 

.-;:: r- "-

POS)--<l cj'- Q-<', 

,0 !;:' {1 

$cor .485 

NC_:\I :) -! ·::.: 

- ·- -

-t;!' iO J.. ,;;,.. /. tf 4 / . .J., ::!i 

'r" ,.. .... .-- r-r :.'" = '"! "---"' =- 0-

A!1DRi='<;:n 

CR_ D 

* 7r;-/lt::; 

... LL L.L 1L _______ L!L .. H t 1 ! t I 'i! f t H! HI i l I I j I!! i! j I!! t I!! IIi ! ) HIt i !1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Bancorp (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Larry A. Dreyer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter J. Johnson, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ LARRY A. DREYER                        /s/ PETER J. JOHNSON
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
Larry A. Dreyer                            Peter J. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer      Sr. VP/Treasurer and Chief Financial
September 12, 2003                         Officer
                                           September 12, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.400 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart establishes criteria and procedures for organizations recognized under 46 CFR part 8, subparts A and B, to be authorized by the Coast Guard to act on behalf of the U.S. The authorization is necessary in order for a recognized organization to perform safety management audits and certification functions delegated by the Coast Guard as described in this part.
( b ) To receive an up-to-date list of recognized organizations authorized to act under this subpart, send a self-addressed, stamped envelope and written request to the Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Standards, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.
#### § 80.1132 Estero-Morro Bay, CA.

A line drawn from the seaward extremity of the Morro Bay East Breakwater to the Morro Bay West Breakwater Light.

[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
Appendix A.9 - Sample Checklist for Station Accessibility

Version 2020.2 Pg. 1 of 1

This document is provided as a sample ONLY. Its use is optional and, if used, it should be customized as 

appropriate. For all appendices, including editable versions of samples and templates, visit 

https://www.nationalservice.gov/operations-handbook-appendices.

Appendix A.9 – Sample Checklist for Station Accessibility

This questionnaire is designed to allow evaluation of the overall accessibility of the ABC

program by looking at where we send volunteers to serve. It is not meant to eliminate

stations for possible placement of volunteers but to provide information needed to match

volunteers with volunteer stations.

Organization Name

1 Is there a flat, non-gravel route from parking/street

through the front entrance? Does the parking lot

have spaces reserved for persons with disabilities?

No Yes Comments

2 Are doors (entrance, rest room, etc.) no heavier to open

than refrigerator door? Are door knobs throughout

push/pull or lever-type, not twist knobs?

3 Are halls and passageways at least one yard wide? Are they 

level, with non-slip stable surfaces and no trip hazards?

4 Are there no steps without alternate routes (elevators,

ramps, other entrance) available? Are stairs of uniform

heights?

5 Is there adequate maneuvering clearance at

entrances, especially rest rooms?

6 Does an accessible restroom have an accessible stall 5’ x 5’?

(There are other legal configurations, but check to see if a

person in a wheelchair can close the door)

7 Does an accessible restroom have a sink with lever faucets,

hot water pipes wrapped to prevent burns, and paper 

towels lowered?

8 Are emergency alarms both audible and visual? Are 

evacuation plans and areas of rescue assistance accessible 

to individuals with mobility impairments?

9 impairments? Do policies, practices or standards – either formal or 

informal- have the direct or indirect effect of excluding or 

limiting the participation of individuals with disabilities in 

your organization’s program or activities?

10 Do policies exist that ensure that a “reasonable 

accommodation” is made to individuals, including 

volunteers, with disabilities?

Name/Signature of person completing checklist Date
§ 268.2 Consequences of non-compliance. ( a ) The Privacy Act authorizes any individual, whether or not an employee, to bring a civil action in U.S. District Court to obtain judicial review of the failure of the Postal Service to comply with the requirements of the Act or its implementing regulations. In certain instances of willful or intentional non-compliance, the plaintiff may recover damages from the Postal Service in the minimum amount of $1,000 together with costs of the action and attorney fees.
( b ) The Act provides criminal sanctions for individuals, including employees, who violate certain of its provisions. ( 1 ) Any officer or employee who, by virtue of his employment or position, has possession of, or access to, official records which contain individually identifiable information and who, knowing that disclosure of the specific material is prohibited by Postal Service regulations, willfully discloses the material to a person or agency not entitled to receive it, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.
( 2 ) Any officer or employee who willfully maintains a system of records without meeting the notice requirements set forth in Postal Service regulations shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.
( 3 ) Any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning another individual from the Postal Service under false pretense shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.
( c ) In addition to the criminal sanctions, any employee violating any provisions of these rules of conduct is subject to disciplinary action which may result in dismissal from the Postal Service.
[40 FR 45726, Oct. 2, 1975]
#### § 90.1 Purpose.

This part contains the interpretative rules for the Inland Rules. These interpretative rules are intended as a guide to assist the public and promote compliance with the Inland Rules.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-CR-20521-RNS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. 

THEODORE FARNSWORTH and 

J. MITCHELL LOWE

 

Defendants. 

 / 

UNITED STATES’ SIXTH RESPONSE TO THE STANDING DISCOVERY ORDERS 

The United States hereby files its sixth response to the Standing Discovery Orders (ECF 

Nos. 8 and 9) as to Defendants Theodore Farnsworth and J. Michell Lowe (the “Defendants”) and 

hereby notifies the Court and all interested parties that as of June 22, 2023, the following 

supplemental discovery has been produced to the Defendants: 

Description Beginning Bates Range Ending Bates Range

Attachments to FBI 

Interview Reports DOJ-PROD23-0000000001 DOJ-PROD23-0000000590 

Stacy Spikes, Black 

Founder (2023) DOJ-PROD23-0000000591 DOJ-PROD23-0000000854 

Emails and attachment DOJ-PROD23-0000000855 DOJ-PROD23-0000000859 

Recording of July 4, 2022 

video conference DOJ-PROD23-0000000860 DOJ-PROD23-0000000861 

The United States recognizes that its obligation to provide discovery is of a continuing 

nature and will supplement this response if and when it obtains additional evidence and materials. 

Respectfully submitted,

 GLENN S. LEON

 CHIEF, FRAUD SECTION

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2023 Page 1 of 3
2 

 CRIMINAL DIVISION

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

 

 By: /s/ Lauren Archer 

 Lauren Archer 

 Christopher Fenton 

 Matthew Reilly

Trial Attorneys

 Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 (Archer) 

 United States Department of Justice

 Criminal Division, Fraud Section

 1400 New York Ave., NW 

 Washington, DC 20005 

 Tel: (202) 538-3859 

 Email: Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov 

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2023 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 28, 2023, the foregoing was filed and served on all counsel of 

record using the CM/ECF system.

 /s/ Lauren Archer 

 Lauren Archer

 Trial Attorney 

 Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 

 United States Department of Justice

 Criminal Division, Fraud Section

 1400 New York Ave., NW 

 Washington, DC 20005 

 Tel: (202) 538-3859 

 Email: Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov 

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/28/2023 Page 3 of 3
§ 80.750 Sanibel Island, FL to St. Petersburg, FL. ( a ) A line formed by the centerline of the highway bridge over Blind Pass, between Captiva Island and Sanibel Island, and lines drawn across Redfish and Captiva Passes parallel to the general trend of the seaward, highwater shorelines.
( b ) A line drawn across the Charlotte Harbor entrance from position latitude 26°42.18′ N, longitude 070°41.2′ W to Port Boca Grande Light.
( c ) Lines drawn across Gasparilla and Stump Passes parallel to the general trend of the seaward, highwater shorelines.
( d ) A line across the seaward extremity of Venice Inlet Jetties.
( e ) A line drawn across Midnight Pass parallel to the general trend of the seaward, highwater shoreline.
( f ) A line drawn from position latitude 27°17.89′ N, longitude 082°33.55′ W to the southernmost extremity of Lido Key (position latitude 27°17.93′ N, longitude 082°33.99′ W).
( g ) A line drawn across New Pass tangent to the seaward, highwater shoreline of Longboat Key.
( h ) A line drawn across Longboat Pass parallel to the seaward, highwater shoreline.
( i ) A line drawn from the northwesternmost extremity of Bean Point to the southeasternmost extremity of Egmont Key.
( j ) A straight line drawn from Egmont Key Light through Egmont Channel Range Rear Light to the shoreline on Mullet Key.
( k ) A line drawn from the northernmost extremity of Mullet Key across Bunces Pass and South Channel to Pass-a-Grille Channel Light 8; thence to Pass-a-Grille Channel Daybeacon 9; thence to the southwesternmost extremity of Long Key.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977; 42 FR 63169, Dec. 15, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, as amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7787, Mar. 6, 1986; CGD 93-071, 58 FR 65668, Dec. 16, 1993; USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30877, June 28, 2019]
EPA Reg. No. 241-74

Vol. 5 – part 2
§ 80.840 Sabine Pass, TX to Galveston, TX. ( a ) A line drawn from the Sabine Pass East Jetty Light to the seaward end of the Sabine Pass West Jetty.
( b ) Lines drawn across the small boat passes through the Sabine Pass East and West Jetties.
( c ) A line formed by the centerline of the highway bridge over Rollover Pass at Gilchrist.
<PAGE>   1



                                   EXHIBIT 11
                                   ----------

                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                        ---------------------------------
                               ALLEN TELECOM INC.
                               ------------------
                             (Amounts in Thousands)


Net income and common shares used in the calculations of earnings per common
share were computed as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                      MARCH 31,
                                                          ----------------------------------
                                                              1998                1997
                                                          --------------     ---------------
<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>    
Income:
-------

    Net income applicable to
         Common stock - Basic and Diluted                       $ 6,338             $ 7,026
                                                          ==============     ===============

Common Shares:
--------------

    Weighted average common shares outstanding-
       Basic                                                     27,160              26,650

    Assumed exercise of stock options                               250                 380
                                                          --------------     ---------------

    Common shares - Diluted                                      27,410              27,030
                                                          ==============     ===============
</TABLE>
October 29 , 2014 Dr . Colleen Cripps, J;>h.D . Admini strator Divi s ion of Environmental Protection 901 S. Stewat1 St. , Suite 4001 Ca r so n C ity NV 89701-5249 Dear Dr. Cripps: Public Health**rr nl.**  Promo l r . Pr o tect.

E nclo sed i s a revision to the Truckee Meadows port i o n of the Nevada 

### PM w State Im plementatio n Plan. The " Redesignation Requ es t a nd Maintenance Plan for the Truc kee Meadows 24 -h o ur PM10 Non-Attaimnent Area", which is inte nd ed t o superse de the 2 009 subnlittal , was adopted at a public hea rin g of the Wa shoe County District Board ofHea lth (DBOH) on August 28 , 20 14 . The s ubmitt a l includes: • Proof of publication for th e public hearin g; • Written Public Comment; • DBOH agenda for the August 28,2014 p ublic hearing; • Staff rep<M; 

### • PMw Re des ig n a

ti on R eque st and Ma inten ance Plan; • App roved minutes fi:om th e August 28,2014 public hearing; and • Certifica t e of Adoption. Two p ape r and two electron i c copies of th e s ubmitt a l are enclosed. T h e elec tronic cop ies a r e exac t dupli ca t es of th e paper copy s ubmitt a l in sear c hab le pdf form at. Plea s e r ev iew th ese documents and determine i f this s ubmittal is complete. If so, please fm wa rd one pap er and o ne elec tr on ic copy to t he U . S. EPA Region IX office . If yo u have any ques ti ons or conunents r ega rdin g this su bmittal, feel free t o contact Ms. Yann Ling-Barnes or me at (775) 784-7200 . Sincerely, Charlene Al b ee D ivi s ion D irector Encl osures cc: Yann Lin g-Ba rn es , P.E., Washoe Co unt y Health Di st rict - AQMD (w / o encl os ures) 1001 EAST N I N T H STREET I P.O . BOX 11130 , RE N O, N EVA D A 89520 (775) 784 - 7200 FAX (775) 784 -7225 

### www . O ur Ci ea n Ai r . co m WASHOE COUNlY I S AN EQUAl OPPORTU N ITY EM P LO Y ER
§ 962.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Attorney* refers to an individual authorized to practice law in any of the United States or the District of Columbia or a territory of the United States.
( b ) *Complaint* refers to the administrative Complaint served by the Reviewing Official on a Respondent pursuant to § 273.8 of this title.
( c ) *Initial Decision* refers to the written decision which the Presiding Officer is required by § 962.20 to render, and includes a revised initial decision issued following a remand.
( d ) *Investigating Official* refers to the Inspector General of the United States Postal Service or any designee within the Office of the Inspector General.
( e ) *Judicial Officer* refers to the Judicial Officer or Acting Judicial Officer of the United States Postal Service or for purposes other than specified in § 962.21 any designee within the Judicial Officer Department.
( f ) *Party* refers to the Postal Service or the Respondent.
( g ) *Person* refers to any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or private organization.
( h ) *Postmaster General* refers to the Postmaster General of the United States or his designee.
( i ) *Presiding Officer* refers to an Administrative Law Judge designated by the Chief Administrative Law Judge to conduct a hearing authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3803.
( j ) Recorder refers to the Recorder of the United States Postal Service, 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22201-3078.
( k ) *Representative* refers to an attorney or other advocate.
( l ) *Respondent* refers to any person alleged to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment under 31 U.S.C. 3802.
( m ) *Reviewing Official* refers to the General Counsel of the Postal Service or any designee within the Law Department who serves in a position for which the rate of basic pay is not less than the minimum rate payable under section 5376 of title 5 of the United States Code.
[52 FR 12904, Apr. 20, 1987, as amended at 63 FR 66053, Dec. 1, 1998; 67 FR 62179, Oct. 4, 2002; 81 FR 40194, June 21, 2016]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Thecurrent**
 
2009:Spring | Fall
2010:Spring | Fall
2011:Spring | Fall
2012:Spring | Fall
2013:Spring | Fall
2014:Spring | Fall
2015:Spring | Fall
2016:Spring | Fall
2017:Spring | Fall
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.2:C 93/
Item Number:0648 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001060268
 
June 12, 2018
Exhibit



Exhibit 4.5.1



AMENDMENT TO 
Endologix, Inc. 2017 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan 


Effective as of July 3, 2019, and pursuant to approval by the Compensation Committee of Endologix, Inc. on such date, the maximum number of shares issuable pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Endologix, Inc. 2017 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan approved by the Board on October 27, 2017 (the “2017 Inducement Plan”), is hereby increased from 400,000 to 900,000 shares of Stock.  
 
Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the 2017 Inducement Plan.   


Except as herein provided, all provisions of the 2017 Inducement Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
§ 958.8 Rights of parties. Subject to the sound discretion of the Presiding Officer, acting under § 958.9, parties to a hearing under this part shall have the right: ( a ) To be accompanied, represented, and advised, by an attorney or representative of his or her own choosing;
( b ) To participate in any conferences held by the Presiding Officer;
( c ) To agree to stipulations of fact or law, which shall be made part of the record;
( d ) To make opening and closing statements at the oral hearing;
( e ) To present oral and documentary evidence relevant to the issues;
( f ) To submit rebuttal evidence;
( g ) To conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts; and
( h ) To submit written briefs, proposed findings of fact, and proposed conclusions of law.