alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-61992-RAR

AVINI HEALTH CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

BIOGENUS LLC,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon sua sponte review of the record. On January 

11, 2023, the Court ordered the parties to select a mediator certified under Local Rule 16.2, as well 

as schedule a time, date, and place for mediation on or before February 1, 2023. Scheduling Order

[ECF No. 16] at 1. The deadline for compliance has passed and, to date, there is no indication the

parties have scheduled a time, date, and place for mediation. It is therefore

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before February 10, 2023, the parties shall 

comply with the requirements of the Scheduling Order and schedule a time, date, and place for 

mediation and show good cause for their failure to fully comply with the Scheduling Order. Failure 

to comply with this Order may result in the entry of sanctions without further notice.

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida this 5th day of February, 2023.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 0:22-cv-61992-RAR Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
6Fiscal Year 2012-13 District BudgetActual Adopted Est. Act. ProposedFY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13Licenses & PermitsEvaluation Fees 272,870$ 227,989$ 225,130$ 209,840$Asbestos Notification Fees 106,281104,03074,03882,400Reevaluation Fees 562,1931,027,1641,004,000868,795Air Toxics (AB 2588) 5,9496,5535,8825,461Application Fees 109,48998,344113,712113,300Annual Emission Fees 906,927919,622906,927933,180Notice of Violation 285,638175,000503,666175,000Inspection Fees 13,22119,61517,99819,615Source Test Fees 55,02061,80061,80087,515DAS 357,483368,207368,207379,204Monitoring 554,606565,732565,700582,588Use of MoneyInterest 69,379130,00050,00075,000Federal, State, and Other GovernmentsFederal - EPA Grant 497,519500,000529,000475,000Motor Vehicle $4 1,342,6191,383,3331,342,5121,360,000Motor Vehicle $2 691,560691,667691,667679,999State-PERP 72,38346,23054,35354,165State-ARB 103,206100,000100,000100,000Other Governments 161,505175,209164,526162,061Charges for ServicesEnvironmental Review 7,6617,0009,0009,000343,001349,335343,001369,149735,416516,283513,649500,126746,008663,520697,324686,769Miscellaneous Revenue8,6294,0442,1002,040Revenue Total 8,008,5638,140,6778,344,1927,930,207Other Financing SourcesRelease of Designations 574,4901,465,7871,052,5321,228,033Revenue Plan Total 8,583,053$ 9,606,464$ 9,396,724$ 9,158,240$REVENUE PLANReimburseable ChargesAQAP FeesCarl Moyer ProgramActual Adopted Est. Act. ProposedFY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13Operating ExpendituresAdministration 3,495,809$ 3,755,2933,713,608$ 3,318,852Engineering & Compliance 2,264,750$ 2,252,3802,271,1402,262,2712,745,222$ 3,565,2712,814,6803,335,190Operating Total 8,505,781$ 9,572,9448,799,4288,916,313Other Financing UsesDesignated for Future Uses 77,272$ 33,520597,296241,927Expenditure Plan Total 8,583,053$ 9,606,4649,396,724$ 9,158,240EXPENDITURE PLANTechnology &Environmental AssessmentCHARACTER OF EXPENDITURESActual Adopted Est. Act. ProposedFY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13Operating ExpendituresRegular Salaries 3,891,113$ 3,839,1513,977,536$ 3,606,801Extra Help -$ 11,222-2,588Benefits 1,677,877$ 1,780,7091,826,7951,759,502Salaries & Benefits Total 5,568,990$ 5,631,0825,804,3315,368,891Services & Supplies 2,652,335$ 3,594,1672,692,2423,295,729Other Charges 165,563$ 163,195144,855161,293Fixed Assets 118,893$ 184,500158,00090,400Operating Total 8,505,781$ 9,572,9448,799,428$ 8,916,313
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended  December  31, 2004 filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I, Daniel R. Luis, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: March 31, 2005

                                               By: /s/ Daniel R. Luis
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Daniel R. Luis
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment and Earnings in the Philadelphia Knitted-Outerwear Industry, 1944 and 1945

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	Votava, George E. 						*Employment and Earnings in the Philadelphia Knitted-Outerwear Industry, 1944 and 1945 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 887*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt., Print. Off., 										1947,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4342,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 334.85 New York Harbor, adjacent to the Stapleton Naval Station, Staten Island, New York; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The waters of New York Harbor beginning at a point on shore at latitude 40°38′02′′ N, longitude 074°04′24′′ W; thence easterly to latitude 40°38′02.5′′ N, longitude 074°04′09′′ W; thence southerly to latitude 40°37′53′′ N, longitude 074°04′07′′ W; thence east-southeasterly to latitude 40°37′50′′ N, longitude 074°03′50.2′′ W; thence south-southeasterly to latitude 40°37′37.5′′ N, longitude 074°03′46′′ W; thence southwesterly to the shore line at latitude 40°37′24.5′′ N, longitude 074°04′18′′ W; thence northerly along the shore line to the point of origin.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The portion of the restricted area extending from the shore out to a line 600 feet east of the U.S. Pierhead Line is closed to all persons and vessels except those vessels owned by, under hire to or performing work for Naval Station New York, Staten Island, New York.
( 2 ) The portion of the restricted area beginning 600 feet seaward of the U.S. Pierhead Line is open to transiting vessels only. Vessels shall proceed across the area by the most direct route and without unnecessary delay. For vessels under sail, necessary tacking shall constitute a direct route.
( 3 ) Commercial vessels at anchor will be permitted to swing into the seaward portion of the restricted area while at anchor and during the tide changes.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, Naval Station New York, and such agencies as he/she shall designate.
[56 FR 5300, Feb. 8, 1991]
```

[House Report 111-125]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    111-125

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE 
    BILL (S. 454) TO IMPROVE THE ORGANIZATION AND PROCEDURES OF THE 
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR THE ACQUISITION OF MAJOR WEAPON SYSTEMS, AND 
                           FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

May 20, 2009.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Ms. Pingree of Maine, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 463]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 463, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of the conference 
report to accompany S. 454, the ``Weapons Acquisition System 
Reform Through Enhancing Technical Knowledge and Oversight Act 
of 2009.''
    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration and provides 
that the conference report shall be considered as read. The 
resolution provides that the Chair may postpone further 
consideration of the conference report to such time as may be 
designated by the Speaker.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    The waiver of all points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration includes a waiver of 
clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of 
conference reports and the accompanying joint explanatory 
statement). Although the rule waives all points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration, 
the conference report does not violate clauses 9 or 10 of rule 
XXI. The waiver of all points of order against the conference 
report is prophylactic.

                                  

```
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except that,
               for the reasons described in the Report, the Company's new
               independent public accountants have not completed their review
               of the unaudited financial statements included in the Report as
               required by Rule 10-01(d) of Regulation S-X; and

        (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company


/s/ William S. Ayer


William S. Ayer
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5046 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5046

To provide that pay for prevailing rate employees in Pasquotank County, 
 North Carolina, be determined by applying the same pay schedules and 
 rates as apply with respect to prevailing rate employees in the local 
        wage area that includes Carteret County, North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Jones of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that pay for prevailing rate employees in Pasquotank County, 
 North Carolina, be determined by applying the same pay schedules and 
 rates as apply with respect to prevailing rate employees in the local 
        wage area that includes Carteret County, North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF SAME PAY SCHEDULES AND RATES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any provision of subchapter IV of 
chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, pay for prevailing rate 
employees in Pasquotank County, North Carolina, shall be fixed and 
adjusted by applying the same pay schedules and rates as apply with 
respect to prevailing rate employees in the local wage area that 
includes Carteret County, North Carolina.
    (b) Definition.--For purposes of this Act, the term ``prevailing 
rate employee'' has the meaning given such term under section 5342 of 
title 5, United States Code.
    (c) Regulations.--The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe 
any regulations necessary to carry out this Act.
    (d) Effective Date.--This Act shall apply with respect to pay for 
service performed in any pay period beginning on or after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
524 P.2d 162

#### John Wesley WARDEN and Gary Warden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. G. T. LATHAN, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 11383.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 10, 1974.

David A. Frazier, Coeur d’Alene, for plaintiffs-appellants.

E. L. Miller, Coeur d’Alene, V. R. Clements, Lewiston, for defendant-respondent.

BAKES, Justice.

This appeal arises out of a judgment of the district court dismissing with preju*35dice under I.R.C.P. 41(b) plaintiff-appellants John Wesley Warden’s and Gary Warden’s complaint for failure to prosecute their action. The original complaint was filed on April 24, 1969. According to the minutes of the court clerk, the case was ready for trial on January 8, 1971. Thereafter, the case was passed on four successive calendar calls. On March 29, 1973, appellants requested a trial setting. On April 5, 1973, respondent filed a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution, supported by an affidavit alleging prejudice caused by the lack of availability of material witnesses. After a hearing the district court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss.

It is well settled in this jurisdiction that the trial court has the authority to dismiss a case because of a failure to prosecute, and that the trial court’s exercise of such authority will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is shown that there was a manifest abuse of discretion. I.R.C.P. 41(b); Cox v. Widmer, 94 Idaho 451, 490 P.2d 318 (1971); Beckman v. Beckman, 88 Idaho 522, 401 P.2d 810 (1965); Hansen v. Firebaugh, 87 Idaho 202, 392 P.2d 202 (1964); 5 Moore’s, Federal Practice 1115, 2d Ed., 1974, § 41-11 [2].

We are mindful that all of the delay in this case might not be attributable solely to appellants. However, “. . .a plaintiff who hails a defendant into court assumes, and, so long as he has the affirmative of the main issue, retains the duty of diligent prosecution,” Hansen v. Firebaugh, *supra,*at p. 209, 392 P.2d at p. 206. This case has been pending in excess of five years. It was passed on four successive calendar calls, and over two years elapsed between the time the case was ready for trial and the time appellant requested a trial setting. In view of all the attending circumstances, we cannot say that the court abused its discretion in dismissing the action with prejudice.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

SHEPARD, C. J., and DONALDSON, McQUADE and McFADDEN, JJ., concur.
(Jor-osr... ~603- 147fJ'3 


Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: slashua@aol.com 

~e"t~,,, .,. ." ..8atLlrday, February 20,201 0 11 :48 AM . ~:~·T0:- ,.,,,,~ :",. DevanY"Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) > 

Subject: . CAPE'AIR VS COLGAN 

I AM HOPING THAT THE COUNTY LEGISLATORS WILL RECONSIDER THEIR DECISI0NTQCHANGE AIRLINES TO 

BOSTON. CAPE AIR HAS DONE A REMARKABLE JOB OF PROVIDING NECESSARY CONNECTIONS TO THIS 

DESTINATION. ONCE AGAIN THE IDEA OF IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T TRY TO FIX IT COMES TO MIND. OUR 

AREA IS COMPETENTLY COVERED BY CAPE AIR AND NO CHANGE IS NECESSARY. THANK YOU FOR ANY 

INFLUENCE YOU MIGHT HAVE IN SEEING THAT THIS TRAVESTY DOESN'T TAKE PLACE. 

SANDRA LASHUA. 

3712 ROUTE 22 

PLATTSBURGH, NY 12901 

1
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of AMERCO (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 3, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Jason A. Berg, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





AMERCO,





a Nevada corporation





/s/ Jason A. Berg





Jason A. Berg


Principal Financial Officer and


Chief Accounting Officer


Date:  November 3, 2010
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of AMERCO, certify
that:

     1.   the Quarterly Report of AMERCO on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AMERCO.



                                        /s/ EDWARD J. SHOEN
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Edward J. Shoen
                                        Chairman of the Board and President
                                        September 26, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel ZDK1 GRB-5 (C1).                    

*Date;*                         June 20, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 AM to 5:00 PM.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contract Person:*                         Francisco O. Calvo, Deputy Chief, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, Room 655, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6600, (301) 594-8897.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology  and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 8, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-14959  Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                The undersigned, James J.Horvath, Chief Executive Officer and President of American Crystal SugarCompany, (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

                1.    TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

                2.    Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

                The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part ofthe Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of July,2006.

 
| By:    | /s/  James J. Horvath                         |   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Name:  James J. Horvath                       |   |
|   | Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|        |                                               |        |        |  |

 

                A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----