June 05, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and

Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations for Kroger Television, the internal media division of 

The Kroger Co., under 200ft AGL.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to §333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 

C.F.R. Part 11, The Kroger Co., hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal 

Aviation Regulations (FARs) to allow commercial operation of its sUASs under 200ft AGL by 

its internal media group, Kroger Television, for purposes of aerial filming and photography of its 

facilities and hosted events, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the 

conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) as required by §333. 

As described more fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of small, 

unmanned and multi-rotor aircraft under controlled conditions in airspace that is 1) contained 2) 

predetermined 3) has on-site safety personnel controlling access, and 4) would provide increased 

safety and enhancements to clients' business operations.

Operations under the exemption will be subject to strict requirements and conditions to ensure at 

least an equivalent level of safety to currently authorized operations using manned aircraft and 

under conditions as may be modified by the FAA as required by Section 333.

We are prepared to modify or amend any part of this request to satisfy the need for an equivalent 

level of safety. We look forward to working with your office. Please contact us at any time if you 

require additional information or clarification.

The name and address of the applicant is:

The Kroger Co. – Kroger Television

Attn: Sayer Crompton

Phone: (513) 762-1392

Email: sayer.crompton@kroger.com

1014 Vine Street

Cincinnati, OH 45202

1
The regulations from which the exemption is requested are as follows:

• 14 C.F.R. Part 21

• 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b)

• 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b)

• 14 C.F.R. 61.133(a)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.7(b)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.109(a)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.119

• 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a)

PUBLIC INTEREST AND HOW THE PUBLIC WILL BENEFIT

The exemption request will permit The Kroger Co.’s Kroger Television division to operate small 

unmanned aircraft systems(sUAS) commercially for the purpose of aerial filming and 

photography of its facilities and hosted events. The Kroger Co. seeks to benefit the public by 

using this platform to provide more in-depth training and communications to its associates 

regarding their facilities resulting in safer work environments and a better customer experience. 

The Kroger Co.’s sUASs are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and economical 

alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the 

amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use 

of a sUAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air 

pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground.

Conducting aerial acquisitions with The Kroger Co.’s sUASs, instead of manned aircraft, will 

greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated 

during traditional aerial survey flight operations. 

PUBLIC SAFETY

The Kroger Co. respectfully submits that because this sUAS will be used in lieu of 

comparatively hazardous operations now conducted with fixed wing and rotary conventional 

aircraft, the FAA can have confidence that the operations will achieve at least an equivalent, if 

not greater, level of safety. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill 

the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities under Section 

2
333(c) of the Reform Act to “establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft 

systems in the national airspace system.”

Utilizing The Kroger Co.’s sUAS for aerial acquisitions will not have detrimental effects to the 

environment caused by operating a combustible fuel based, large scale manned aircraft. 

Whether helping to protect the public, inspecting infrastructure or acquiring aerial imagery, 

sUASs provide real-time situational awareness, enabling better decision-making. Better decisionmaking saves lives and protects property.

PRIVACY

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property owner’s or

controlling authority’s prior consent and knowledge. 

Aerial photography/filming will be of people who have also consented to being photographed or 

otherwise have agreed to be in the area where filming will take place.

Airworthiness of the Inspire

The DJI Inspire 1 is small, lightweight, and will operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, far 

from airports and in a low risk, low population environments. Approval of this exemption would 

thereby enhance safety and also fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA 

Administrator’s) responsibilities under Section 333(c) of the Reform Act to “establish 

requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.”

A critical element of the exemption application involves evidence of the airworthiness of the 

Inspire. The Kroger Co. believes that it is in compliance with the requirements of Order 

8130.34C, Airworthiness Certification of Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Optionally Piloted

Aircraft, in its use of system developed by DJI. The Inspire has a high degree of redundancy and 

numerous safety features, including:

• Return-to-home failsafe in the event of a loss of communications or low battery

• Configurable Geo-fenced limitations for area of operation and altitude

• Configurable limitations for vertical and horizontal speed

• High visibility lighting system

• Interactive on screen display for streaming real time systems data.

Mandatory Operating Conditions

Grant of the exemption to The Kroger Co.’s internal media division Kroger Television will be 

subject to the following mandatory conditions, which are based upon operating conditions set 

forth for operation of UAS by public entities pursuant to Certificates of Authorization, with 

additional restrictions:

• Operations to be conducted over private or controlled-access property.

• Permission from land owner/controller required before commencing any flight.

• Operations to occur during Visual Flight Rules Meteorological Conditions (VMC).

• Aircraft to remain within Visual Line of Sight (VLOS).

o VLOS guaranteed with a cylinder of operation around operator of 1⁄2 nautical miles

(NM).

3
o Cylinder walls may be expanded by observer with ability to control aircraft.

• Operations to occur during daylight hours.

• Above Ground Level (AGL) altitude to be restricted to 500 feet and below.

• All operations conducted in vicinity of airport to remain more than 2.5 NM from centerline

azimuth of runway centerline measured from runway thresholds. Unless otherwise approved by 

local airport authority and NOTAM’d as such

• Operator will file a NOTAM for each flight, as required.

• All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city

jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies.

Operator Requirements

The Kroger Co. respectfully proposes that operator requirements should take into account the 

characteristics of the particular UAS. Certain UASs, such as the DJI Inspire1, are characterized 

by a high degree of pre-programmed control and various built-in technical capabilities that limit 

the potential for operation outside of the operating conditions set forth above.

The Inspire has a semi-autonomous navigation and control system comprised of a Ground 

Control Station (GCS) and auto pilot system. Flights can be pre-programmed and operate with 

GPS guidance and may not require human intervention. Additional automated safety functions 

and safety enhancing features of the Inspire include the

following:

• Auto-pilot detection of lost GPS or of insufficient satellites initiates an immediate 

vertical landing, unless overridden by pilot in command.

• Low power on the aircraft triggers escalating alarms at GCS at 35% and 10% levels.

• If the auto-pilot detects a lost-link to the GCS for longer than 30 seconds, return-tohome sequence initiates.

• Aircraft has an on-board failsafe that limits vertical speed to approximately 6 m/s

(configurable).

• The aircraft, weighing less than 7 lbs., fully loaded, is constructed of composite material

intended to absorb impact energy.

• The motors are driven by pulse width modulated signals, not analog signals.

Given these safety features, The Kroger Co. proposes that the operator and Inspire1 together are 

more than qualified to operate commercial flights while maintaining the highest level of safety 

standards. 

Additionally, no national security issue is raised by the grant of the requested exemption. Given 

the size, load carrying capacity, speed at which it operates, and the fact that it carries no 

explosives or other dangerous materials, the Inspire poses no threat to national security. 

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

1. UAS Operational Limitations and Conditions

2. Pre Flight/Post Flight Checklist

3. DJI Inspire1, Operating Manual

4. DJI Inspire1, Maintenance Manual

5. DJI Inspire1, Safety Guidelines

6. DJI Inspire1 Quickstart Guide 

7. DJI Inspire1 Intelligent Flight Battery Safety Guidelines

4
8. DJI Disclaimer and Warning document for Inspire1

APPENDIX A

EXEMPTION REQUEST AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY

SHOWINGS UNDER APPLICABLE RULES SUBJECT TO EXEMPTION

The Kroger Co. requests an exemption from the following regulations as well as any additional 

regulations that may technically apply to the operation of the Inspire:

14 C.F.R. § 45.23(b): Marking of the Aircraft

The regulation provides:

When marks include only the Roman capital letter “N” and the registration number is 

displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport category aircraft or experimental or 

provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each 

entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more 

than 6 inches high, the words “limited,” “restricted,” “light-sport,” “experimental,” or 

“provisional,” as applicable.

The Inspire has no entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station on which the word 

“Experimental” can be placed. Given the size of the UAV, two-inch lettering will be impossible. 

The word “Experimental” will be placed on the forward fuselage in compliance with § 45.29(f).

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved by having the Inspire marked as required by 

§ 45.29(f) where the pilot, observer, and others working with the UAV will see the identification 

of the UAS as “Experimental.” The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation, 

Exemption Nos. 10700, 8738, 10167 and 10167A.

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 CFR § 91.203(a)(1)

Section 91.203(a)(1) requires all civil aircraft to have a certificate of airworthiness. Part 21, 

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for the 

issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR § 91.203(a)(1). Given the size of the 

aircraft (under 7lbs.) and the limited operating area associated with its utilization, it is 

unnecessary to go through the certificate of airworthiness process under Part 21 Subpart H to 

achieve or exceed current safety levels.

Such an exemption meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and 

Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act and Section 333 of the Reform Act 

both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, 

upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports 

and populated areas of the UAS involved.

In this case, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the Inspire operated without an 

airworthiness certificate, under the conditions proposed herein, will be at least as safe, or safer, 

than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) with an airworthiness certificate. The 

Inspire weighs less than 7 lbs. fully loaded. It will not carry a pilot or passenger, will not carry 

flammable fuel, and will operate exclusively within an area pre-disclosed and in compliance with 

5
conditions set forth herein. Operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and 

monitored by both the operator, pursuant to the conditions set forth above, and by local public 

safety requirements. Receipt of the prior permission of the land owner, the size of the aircraft,

the lack of flammable fuel, and the fact that the aircraft is carried to the location and not flown 

there all establish the equivalent level of safety. The Inspire construction with absorbent material 

provides at least an equivalent level of safety to that of such operations being conducted with

conventional aircraft that would be orders-of-magnitude larger and would be carrying passengers,

cargo, and flammable fuel.

14 C.F.R. § 61.113(a) & (b); 61.133(a): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations; Pilot in

Command; Commercial Pilot Privileges and Limitations.

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations. Because the UAS 

will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of 

safety of current operations by requiring the PIC operating the aircraft to have a private pilot’s 

license rather than a commercial pilot’s license to operate this small UAS. Unlike a conventional 

aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, the sUAS is remotely controlled with no living thing 

on board. The area of operation is controlled and restricted, and all flights are planned and 

coordinated in advance. The risks associated with the operation of the sUAS are so diminished 

from the level of risk associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when 

drafted, that allowing operations of the sUAS as requested with a private pilot or higher rating as 

the PIC exceeds the present level of safety achieved by 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b)

14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness.

This regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy 

condition. Should the exemption be granted allowing commercial operation of the Inspire 

without an airworthiness certificate, no standard will exist for airworthiness of the Inspire. Given 

the size of the aircraft and the requirements that have presumably already been met in the SAC 

approval process for the Inspire (for instance, the Inspire’s Maintenance & Inspection Manual 

and Safety Checklist), an equivalent level of safety will be achieved by insuring compliance with 

the appropriate manuals prior to each flight.

14 C.F.R. § 91.9(b)(2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft.

The regulation provides:

No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft ... (2)...For which an Airplane or 

Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available

in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual 

material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof.

Given the size and configuration of the Inspire, it has no ability or place to carry such a flight 

manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no room 

or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft.

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping the flight manual (see, e.g., User 

Guide, Exhibit 2) at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate 

access to it. The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation: Exemption Nos. 

8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 32827, and 10700.

14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a) & 91.319(a)(1): Flight Instruction

These regulations provide that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free 

6
balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual 

controls. The Inspire is a remotely piloted aircraft and by design, does not have fully functional 

dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates 

with the aircraft via radio communications. The flight plan is pre-programmed into the auto pilot 

before flight and only in unusual circumstances will the pilot input control functions to alter the 

pre-programmed flight. If instruction is accomplished through a training program, as set forth in 

Exhibit 2, an equivalent level of safety will be assured. The FAA has approved exemptions for 

flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight 

instruction in experimental aircraft. See Exemption Nos. 5778K & 9862A. The equivalent level 

of safety will be achieved by the manufacturer providing the training as outlined, for example, in 

Exhibit 2 and through the use of experienced and qualified pilots familiar with the Inspire1.

14 CFR § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Specifically, 91.119(c) 

limits aircraft flying over areas other than congested areas to an altitude of 500 feet above the 

surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not 

be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.

As set forth herein, the Inspire will never operate at higher than 200 feet AGL. Because aerial 

filming and photography of facilities must be captured at low altitudes to be beneficial in a 

training and communications environment, an exemption from Section 91.119(c) is needed.

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed, and material with 

which the Inspire is built. Also, no flight will be taken without the permission of the land owner, 

if other than The Kroger Co., or those who control the land. Compared to aerial filming and 

photography operations conducted with aircraft or rotorcraft weighing far more than 7 lbs. and 

carrying flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations will be far less than those 

currently allowed with conventional aircraft operating at or below 200 feet AGL. Indeed, the 

low-altitude operations of the UAS will maintain separation between these small- UAS 

operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119.

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

This regulation prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under VFR 

conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly 

to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed – (1) During the day, 

to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.”

The Inspire batteries provide approximately 20 minutes of powered flight. Without an exemption 

from § 14 CFR 91.151, the UAS’s flights would be limited to approximately 20 minutes in 

length. Given the limitations on its proposed operations and the location of those proposed 

operations, a longer time frame for flight in daylight VFR conditions is reasonable.

The Kroger Co. believes that an exemption from 14 CFR § 91.151(a) is safe and within the scope 

of a prior exemption. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate 

without compliance with 91.151(a)). Operating the small UAS, without 30 minutes of reserve 

fuel does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was meant to prevent given the 

size and speed at which the UAS operates. The fact that it carries no pilot, passenger, or cargo 

also enhances its safety. In the unlikely event that the Inspire1 should run out of fuel, it would 

simply land. Given its weight and construction material, the risks are less than contemplated by 

the current regulation. The Kroger Co. believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved 

by maintaining 25% battery reserve, which would be more than adequate to return the UAS to its

7
planned landing zone from anywhere in its operating area.

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) & (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration

This regulation provides as follows:

(a)...no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has...an appropriate and current

airworthiness certificate.

(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by

paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is 

displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew.

The Inspire1 fully loaded weighs no more than 7 lbs. As such, there is no ability or place to carry

certification and registration documents or to display them on the UAS. In addition, there is no 

pilot on board the aircraft.

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground control 

point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate access to them. The FAA has issued 

numerous exemptions to this regulation. A representative sample of other exceptions includes 

Exemption Nos. 9565, 9665, 9789, 9789A, 9797, 9797A, 9816A, and 10700.

14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a); 407(a)(1); 409(a)(2); 417(a): Maintenance Inspections

Section 91.405(a) requires that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspected as

prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in

paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this 

chapter...” Section 91.407 similarly makes reference to requirements in Part 43; Section 

91.409(a)(2) requires an annual inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate. 

Section 91.417(a) requires the owner or operator to keep records showing certain maintenance 

work that has been accomplished by certificated mechanics, under Part 43, or licensed pilots and 

records of approval of the aircraft for return to service.

Maintenance of the Inspire will be accomplished by the owner/operator pursuant to the manuals, 

such provided by The Kroger Co. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the 

UAS is small in size, will operate only in restricted predetermined areas, and is not a complex 

mechanical device. As provided in the attached User Manual and the Safety Checklist, the 

operator of Inspire1 will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, 

perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance that is performed. Moreover, 

the operator is the person most familiar with the aircraft and is best suited to maintain the aircraft 

in an airworthy condition and to ensure an equivalent level of safety.

APPENDIX B

SUMMARY OF EA SECTION 333 EXEMPTION REQUEST

Exemption numbers 11606, 11607, and 11558 are examples of the past granted exemptions using 

the Inspire1 for similar-purposed uses and as such, they should be taken into consideration. The 

Kroger Co. hereby provides pursuant to Part 11 a summary of its exemption application to allow 

commercial operation of the Inspire unmanned aircraft for the purpose of aerial filming and 

photography of its facilities and events. An exemption is requested from the following 

8
regulations:

• 14 C.F.R. Part 21

• 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b)

• 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b)

• 14 C.F.R. 61.133(a)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.7(b)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.109(a)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.119

• 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2)

• 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a)

THE APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARD UNDER SECTION 333

The Kroger Co. submits that grant of this exemption application advances the

Congressional mandate in Section 333 of the Reform Act to accelerate the introduction of

sUASs into the NAS if it can be accomplished safely. This law directs the Secretary of

Transportation to consider whether certain UASs may operate safely in the NAS before

completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of the Reform Act. In making this

determination, the Secretary is required to determine which types of UASs do not create a hazard 

to users of the NAS, the public, or pose a threat to national security in light of the following:

● The UAS’s size, weight, speed, and operational capability;

● Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and

● Operation of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator.

Reform Act §333(a)(1). If the Secretary determines that such vehicles “may operate safely in the 

national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such 

aircraft in the national airspace system.” Id.§333(c). 

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. This

statutory authority, by its terms, includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under

§40101 of the Act, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must have current airworthiness

certificate and those regulations requiring commercial pilots to operate aircraft in commercial

service:

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed 

under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any of sections 4470244716 of this title if the 

Administrator finds the exemption is in the public interest. 

The grant of the requested exemption is in the public interest based on the clear direction in

Section 333 of the Reform Act; the additional authority in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; 

the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations; and the significant 

9
public benefit, including enhanced safety and cost savings associated with use of sUASs for 

aerial videography/photography, the reduction or elimination of unregulated operators, and the 

safe integration of UASs. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the FAA grant the 

requested exemption without delay.

Conclusion

As set forth herein, The Kroger Co. seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and 

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 from the requirements of 14 

CFR § 21; 61.113 (a) & (b); 61.133 (a); 91.7 (a); 91.9 (b); 91.109 (a); 91.119 

(c); 91.121; 91.151 (a); 91.203; 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.417 (a) & (b), 

which will permit safe operation of the sUASs commercially, without an airworthiness 

certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial filming and photography over small, 

defined operational areas of the United States. 

Approval of the exemption allowing commercial operations of The Kroger Co.’s sUASs by 

Kroger Television will increase safety by permitting an operator to conduct a service safely by 

adhering to the prescribed guidelines. The exemption will also encourage the education of sUAS

operators and the adoption of FAA guidelines and approval for commercial sUAS operations as 

pertains to The Kroger Co.’s employees. It will allow The Kroger Co. to provide a service that 

benefits the public and its associates. It benefits the public through a higher level of safety of 

sUAS operations and through a smooth integration of sUASs into the NAS. This assists the FAA 

with its mission of promoting aviation while preserving safety of aviators, the public, and 

property. The sUASs operated by The Kroger Co.’s internal media department, Kroger 

Television, satisfiy the criteria set forth in §333 of the Reform Act–size, weight, speed, operating 

capabilities, operation within visual line of sight, and national security–and showing an 

equivalent level of safety to manned aircraft flights through appropriate pilot certification and 

safety focused standards of operation, providing more than adequate justification for the grant of 

the requested exemptions allowing commercial operations. By granting this Petition, the FAA 

Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing The Kroger 

Co. to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the sUASs commercially within the NAS.

Thank you for your review of this matter.

Respectfully,

Sayer Crompton

The Kroger Co. 

10
11