### 14729 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2012 / Notices

1 See Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 62343 (October 7, 2011) ( Preliminary Results).

2 The Department received a timely request to conduct an administrative review of the following 35 companies: Abhinav Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.; American Scholar, Inc. and/or I-Scholar; Ampoules & Vials Mfg. Co. Ltd.; AR Printing & Packaging (India) Pvt.; Bafna Exports; Cello International Pvt. Ltd. (M/S Cello Paper Products); Corporate Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; Creative Divya; D.D International; Exel India (Pvt.) Ltd.; Exmart International Pvt. Ltd.; Fatechand Mahendrakumar; FFI International; Freight India Logistics Pvt. Ltd.; International Greetings Pvt. Ltd.; Kejriwal Paper Ltd., and Kejriwal Exports; Lodha Offset Limited; Magic International Pvt Ltd.; Marigold ExIm Pvt. Ltd.; Marisa International; Navneet Publications (India) Ltd.; Orient Press Ltd.; Paperwise Inc.; Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd.; Premier Exports; Rajvansh International; Riddhi Enterprises; SAB International; Sar Transport Systems; Seet Kamal International; Sonal Printers Pvt Ltd; Super Impex; Swati Growth Funds Ltd.; V & M; and Yash

Laminates.

3 See Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 5486 (February 3, 2012). 4 See the Department’s letter to Navneet, titled ‘‘Rejection of Rebuttal Brief with Untimely Filed New Factual Information,’’ dated December 16,
2011; see also Memo from George McMahon to the File titled, ‘‘Rejection of Submission Due to Untimely Filed New Factual Information,’’ dated December 16, 2011.

5 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(b) and (c), parties in this administrative review may only file factual information (1) up to 140 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the review, (2) in response to Departmental requests, or (3) within 10 days after the submission of factual information by another party pursuant to the 140-day deadline or a Departmental request. Accordingly, based on these rules, new factual information is not permitted in
case and rebuttal briefs. See, e.g., Stainless Steel Bar from India: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Revocation of the Order, in Part, 76 FR 56401, 56402 (September 13, 2011). **COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS**

**Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Ohio Advisory Committee** 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a fact finding meeting of the Ohio Advisory Committee to the
Commission will convene at 9 a.m. and adjourn at 5 p.m. on April 4, 2012, at Wilmington College, McCoy Room, College Street, Wilmington, OH 45177. The purpose of the meeting is to conduct a fact finding on civil rights issues regarding barriers to entrepreneurship in Ohio. Participants of the meeting will include community representatives, government officials, business leaders, and other interested parties.

Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the
comments must be received in the regional office by May 4, 2012. The address is 55 W. Monroe St., Suite 410, Chicago, IL 60603. Persons wishing to email their comments, or to present their comments verbally at the meeting,
or who desire additional information should contact Carolyn Allen, Administrative Assistant, (312) 353– 8311, or by email: callen@usccr.gov.

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Midwestern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission’s Web site, www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Midwestern Regional Office at the above
email or street address.

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and

FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC, March 7, 2012.

Peter Minarik, Acting Chief, Regional Programs
Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 2012–5948 Filed 3–12–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6335–01–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE** 

**International Trade Administration**

**[A–533–843]**

**Certain Lined Paper Products From**
**India: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative** 
**Review**

**AGENCY :**  Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

**SUMMARY :**  On October 7, 2011, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the antidumping duty administrative review for certain lined paper products from India (CLPP). 1 This review covers 35 manufacturers and exporters of the subject merchandise, 2 including Navneet Publications (India) Limited (Navneet) and Riddhi Enterprises (Riddhi), for the period September 1, 2009, through August 31, 2010. As a result of our analysis of the comments received, these final results differ from the Preliminary Results . On February 3, 2012, the Department extended the final results of this review from February 6, 2012, to March 5, 2012. 3

For our final results, we continue to find that Navneet and Riddhi have made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV). In addition, based on these final results for Navneet and Riddhi, we have determined that the 33 remaining non-selected companies willreceive the weighted-average nonselected respondent rate as calculated in these final results.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: March 13, 2012. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Stephanie Moore (Navneet) and George McMahon (Riddhi), AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3692, (202) 482– 1167, respectively.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Comments From Interested Parties

We invited parties to comment on our Preliminary Results. Riddhi submitted a case brief on November 4, 2011, and the petitioner and Navneet submitted case briefs on November 7, 2011, respectively. On November 14, 2011, Navneet filed a rebuttal brief. On November 15, 2011, the petitioner filed a rebuttal brief. The petitioner filed a letter on December 14, 2011, requesting that the Department reject Navneet’s rebuttal brief claiming it included untimely filed new factual information. The Department found that Navneet did in fact, include certain untimely filed factual information in its rebuttal brief and rejected this brief on December 16,

2011. 4 Pursuant to the Department’sletter of December 16, 2011, Navneet refiled its rebuttal brief on December 23, 2011, to exclude the untimely filed factual information. 5
Scope of the Order

The scope of this order includes certain lined paper products, typically school supplies (for purposes of this scope definition, the actual use of or labeling these products as school supplies or non-school supplies is not a defining characteristic) composed of or including paper that incorporates straight horizontal and/or vertical lines on ten or more paper sheets (there shall be no minimum page requirement for loose leaf filler paper) including but not limited to such products as single- and