alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 12.1


                       AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORPORATION
                 (a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express
                     Travel Related Services Company, Inc.)

          COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            Nine Months Ended
                              September 30,
                               (Unaudited)               Years Ended December 31,
                            -----------------   ------------------------------------------
                               2003   2002       2002     2001     2000     1999     1998
                            -----------------   ------------------------------------------
<S>                           <C>     <C>       <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings:
Net income                    $ 189   $ 150     $  228   $  277   $  286   $  223   $  237
Income tax provision             99      77        118      140      150      120      128
Interest expense                639     691        916    1,458    1,459    1,130    1,190
                              -------------     ------------------------------------------

Total earnings (a)            $ 927   $ 918     $1,262   $1,875   $1,895   $1,473   $1,555
                              =============     ==========================================

Fixed charges -
   interest expense (b)       $ 639   $ 691     $  916   $1,458   $1,459   $1,130   $1,190
                              =============     ==========================================

Ratio of earnings
   to fixed charges (a/b)      1.45    1.33       1.38     1.29     1.30     1.30     1.31
</TABLE>

Note: Gross rentals on long-term leases were minimal in amount in each of the
periods shown.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Luna Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Marcel de Groot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of April, 2004.

| | /s/ Marcel de Groot
Marcel de Groot
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------











---
[Crim. No. 2020.

First Appellate District, Division Two.

July 6, 1938.]

#### In the Matter of the Application of HARMON B. GREEN for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

*451U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Seibert L. Sefton, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellant.

Harmon B. Green, *in pro. per.,*for Respondent.

Leo Friedman, as *Amicus Curiae,*on Behalf of Respondent.

NOURSE, P. J.

This is an appeal by the state from an order of the superior court releasing a prisoner on hearing upon a writ of *hateas corpus.*

On August 12, 1936, the petitioner was received at San Quentin prison upon commitment on twelve separate counts of grand theft, sentences for which ran concurrently. On August 10, 1937, the board of prison terms and paroles fixed his term at five years. At the same time the board caused to be entered in its minutes a resolution allowing the prisoner to go on parole during the last two and one-half years of his term “unless the said Board shall hereafter otherwise determine”. The clerk of the board gave written notice to the prisoner of this action, but omitted the clause just quoted. Thereafter, and before the prisoner was released from the prison, the board rescinded its resolution, and he is still confined in that institution.

Relying' upon the notice given him by the clerk, he now argues that he is illegally restrained of his liberty—that the board’s power was limited by section 1168 of the Penal Code to a “revocation” of his parole, and that this could be done only after notice and hearing, and that the cause thereof should be stated in the order. The contentions of petitioner are not sound, and the order of discharge must be reversed.

The action of the board is to be determined by the minutes of the proceedings and not by the notice which the clerk gave to the prisoner. The minutes are conceded to be a correct statement of what occurred at the meeting. That determination cannot be affected by any action of the clerk in his communications with the prisoner. The statute does not require such notice, and the prisoner may not predicate any legal right to release upon this error, or omission, of the clerk. Thus the board expressly reserved the right to rescind *452its resolution and, because of this rescission, no parole is in effect, and the prisoner is legally retained in custody.

All other points argued by the respondent are covered in the opinion filed this day in *In re Allen (ante,*p. 447 [81 Pac. (2d) 168]), and the reasons there given are controlling here.

The order is reversed, and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the warden.

Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5144 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5144

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 203 West Paige Street, in Tompkinsville, Kentucky, as the ``Tim Lee 
                     Carter Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2000

 Mr. Whitfield (for himself and Mrs. Northup) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 203 West Paige Street, in Tompkinsville, Kentucky, as the ``Tim Lee 
                     Carter Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIM LEE CARTER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 203 West Paige Street, in Tompkinsville, Kentucky, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Tim Lee Carter Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Tim Lee 
Carter Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5100 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5100

To clarify that certain penalties provided for in the Oil Pollution Act 
of 1990 are the exclusive criminal penalties for any action or activity 
that may arise or occur in connection with certain discharges of oil or 
                         a hazardous substance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

  Mr. Vitter (for himself, Mr. Coble, and Mr. Clement) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify that certain penalties provided for in the Oil Pollution Act 
of 1990 are the exclusive criminal penalties for any action or activity 
that may arise or occur in connection with certain discharges of oil or 
                         a hazardous substance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AFFIRMATION OF PENALTIES UNDER OIL POLLUTION ACT OF 1990.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision or rule of 
law, sections 4301(c) and 4302 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (Public 
Law 101-380; 104 Stat. 537) and the amendments made by those sections 
provide the exclusive criminal penalties for any action or activity 
that may arise or occur in connection with a discharge of oil or a 
hazardous substance referred to in section 311(b)(3) of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1321(b)(3)).
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to limit, or otherwise exempt any person from, liability for 
conspiracy to commit any offense against the United States, for fraud 
and false statements, or for the obstruction of justice.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-62018-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

KEITH A. CLAYBORNE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GOLDEN KRUST FRANCHISING, INC.,

Doing business as Golden Krust Caribbean

Bakery & Grill,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE;

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Golden Krust Franchising Inc.’s 

Motion to Dismiss on the grounds asserted are all subject to arbitration [DE 12] (the “Motion”)

and the February 10, 2023 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 

Panayottta Augustin-Birch (the “Report”) [DE 24]. The Court notes that no objections to the 

Report [DE 24] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely 

objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 24] are hereby 

adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 

(11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 

1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). 

 Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of 

the Report [DE 24] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees 

with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. 

Case 0:22-cv-62018-WPD Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/27/2023 Page 1 of 2
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [DE 24] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 

2. The Motion [DE 12] is hereby GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED AS PART as 

follows:

a. The parties are hereby COMPELLED to arbitrate the claims Plaintiff pled in 

the Complaint; 

b. This action is hereby STAYED pending arbitration;

c. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case and 

DENY AS MOOT any pending motions. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, 

this 27th day of February, 2023.

Copies to:

Counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-62018-WPD Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/27/2023 Page 2 of 2
hckt-ex101_44.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT TO 

THE HACKETT GROUP, INC. 1998 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN 

(Amended and Restated as of March 16, 2015) 

This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to The Hackett Group, Inc. 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated as of March 16, 2015 (the “Plan”), which provides certain protection for recipients of awards under the Plan who are involuntarily terminated following a Change of Control, as such term is defined in the Plan, was adopted by the Board of Directors of The Hackett Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on October 31, 2019, and is effective as of such date. 


	
 
	
1.
	
The Plan hereby is amended by adding the following new definition in alphabetical order to Section 2:




“Cause” shall have the meaning, with respect to a Grantee, as set forth in any employment agreement between the Company or any Affiliate and the Grantee; provided, however, that in the absence of an employment agreement containing such definition, “Cause” means, with respect to a Grantee: 


	
 
	
(a)
	
the commission of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude or the commission of any other act or omission involving dishonesty or fraud with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their customers or suppliers;





	
 
	
(b)
	
conduct tending to bring the Company or any of its Subsidiaries into substantial public disgrace or disrepute; 





	
 
	
(c)
	
substantial and repeated failure to perform Grantee’s duties, and such failure is not cured within 30 days after the Grantee receives notice thereof;





	
 
	
(d)
	
gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; or





	
 
	
(e)
	
any breach of any confidentiality, non-solicitation or non-competition agreement to which Grantee is bound.





	
 
	
2.
	
The Plan is hereby further amended to add the following new sentences to the end of Section 18.3: 




“In the event a Grantee’s Grant is assumed, continued, or substituted for in accordance with the immediately preceding sentence, and his or her employment or service is terminated without Cause within twelve (12) months following the consummation of such Change of Control, the Grantee shall be immediately vested in the unvested portion of his or her Grant as of such termination of employment or service.  For the avoidance of doubt, the immediately preceding provision shall apply to all Grants under the Plan, regardless of when granted.”

* * * 

To record adoption of the Amendment of the Plan by the Board of Directors as of October 31, 2019, the Company has caused its authorized officer to execute this Amendment to the Plan. 

 


	
The Hackett Group, Inc.

	
 

	
/s/ Frank A. Zomerfeld

	
Name: Frank A. Zomerfeld

	
Title: Secretary
§ 3030.124 Docket and notice. ( a ) The Commission will establish a docket for each rate adjustment filed by the Postal Service under § 3030.121, promptly publish notice of the filing in the Federal Register, and post the filing on its website. The notice shall include the items specified in paragraphs (b) through (g) of this section.
( b ) The general nature of the proceeding.
( c ) A reference to legal authority under which the proceeding is to be conducted.
( d ) A concise description of the planned changes in rates, fees, and the Mail Classification Schedule.
( e ) The identification of an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in the docket.
( f ) A period of 30 days from the date of the filing for public comment.
( g ) Such other information as the Commission deems appropriate.
Exhibit 32
Chief Executive and Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  Chief  Executive and
Financial  Officer of Senior Optician  Service,  Inc., (the  "Company"),  hereby
certify that,  to the best of my knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the  "Report")  fully  complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: June 15, 2006


                                            By: /s/ Donald Hill
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Donald Hill
                                               Chief Executive/Financial Officer
UNITEDSTATES,DIjTRICTCOURT

AOUTHXRNDISTRICT 0*FLOW DA

caseNo.22-20340-cl&w ILLIAM s(s)

.

. '

,

.m 'N....

1.5 RE S.EALFD'INDICTMENT

. /

SEALED ORDER

,'l'heUnited StàtesofAmerica,hyving ppplied tothisCourtforap Ordersealingthe

2y' .'-

' Indldmen'ttanda. 1l.attachm entsthereto,andthisM otion andany related Ordersandproceedings,

dtlecot'tfihdinggpodcause:

- ITr ISHEREBY ORXE' RF,D thatthelndictinentahdal.lattachme.n. tsfhereto,thisM otion

aqd.orderatl.danyrèl>tedOrdersandprôceedings,shallbefiledtmdersealtmtil.furth. èrorderof

tllisCotlr. t, however,theUnitedStatesAttorney'sOffice,HomelandSeclzritylnyestigations,and

theU.SFislt& WildlifçServicemayobtaincopiesofthesesealed. documentforôfficialpuposes,

OranyOthernecrssarycause.

.

. .

h

DONEAND ORDERXD atM iami,Florida,thij dàyofNovèntbpr2022.

. *1 ' œ' L. ,

': C'

LISETT: M .REID

' UN ITED STATESM AGISTRATE JUD GE

cc: ClerkofCourt

AUSA T'.W atts-Fitzgerald

Case 1:22-cr-20340-KMW Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### § 80.150 Block Island, RI.

The 72 COLREGS shall apply on the harbors of Block Island.
#### § 385.15 Consistency with requirements of the State of Florida.

The State of Florida has established procedures, requirements, and approvals that are needed before the State or the South Florida Water Management District can participate as the non-Federal sponsor for projects of the Plan. Project Implementation Reports shall include such information and analyses, consistent with this part, as are necessary to facilitate review and approval of projects by the South Florida Water Management District and the State pursuant to the requirements of Florida law.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of K.J.G., a child, * From the 29th District

 Court of Palo Pinto County,

 Trial Court No. C45962.

No. 11-15-00132-CV * December 3, 2015

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
§ 101-26.501-6 Forms used in connection with delivery of vehicles. ( a ) *GSA Form 1398, GSA Purchased Vehicle.* This form is used by the contractor to indicate that preshipment inspection and servicing of each vehicle has been performed. The contractor is required to complete GSA Form 1398 (illustrated at § 101-26.4902-1398) and affix it, preferably, to the lock face or door frame of the right front door after the final inspection. The form should be left in place during the warranty period to permit prompt identification of vehicles requiring dealer repairs pursuant to the warranty.
( b ) *Standard Form 368, Quality Deficiency Report (Category II).* GSA is constantly striving to improve customer service and the quality of motor vehicles for which it contracts. To inform contractors of the deficiencies noted during the life of the vehicles, Standard Form 368 shall be prepared by the consignee and sent to GSA describing details of vehicle deficiency and action taken for correction. Procedures for documenting and reporting quality deficiencies are set forth in the GSA Publication “Discrepancies or Deficiencies in GSA or DOD Shipments, Material or Billings.” Agencies are urged to report all deficiencies to GSA irrespective of satisfactory corrective action taken by the manufacturer's authorized dealer. If the dealer refuses to take corrective action on any vehicle within its warranty period, the report shall so state and include an explanation of circumstances. Standard Form 368 shall also be used to report all noncompliance with specifications or other requirements of the purchase order.
( c ) *Instructions to Consignee Receiving New Motor Vehicles Purchased by General Services Administration.* This information is printed on the reverse of the consignee copy of the delivery order. Personnel responsible for receipt and operation of Government motor vehicles should be familiar with the instructions and information contained in the document entitled “Instructions to Consignee Receiving New Motor Vehicles Purchased by General Services Administration.”
[41 FR 34631, Aug. 16, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 32768, July 28, 1978; 52 FR 29524, Aug. 10, 1987; 57 FR 47778, Oct. 20, 1992]
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA-2013-0545

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM048AD

727-53-0149, R3 --- 11/2/89

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5477 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5477

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To establish a moratorium on approval by the Secretary of the Interior 
  of relinquishment of a lease of certain tribal lands in California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON RELINQUISHMENT OF LEASE.

    Prior to January 1, 2003, the Secretary of the Interior shall not 
approve the relinquishment of any lease entered into for the 
establishment of a health care facility for the members of seven Indian 
Tribes or Bands in San Diego County, California, unless the Secretary 
has determined that the relinquishment of such lease has been approved, 
by tribal resolution, by each of the seven Indian Tribes or Bands.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5477

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To establish a moratorium on approval by the Secretary of the Interior 
  of relinquishment of a lease of certain tribal lands in California.
```