alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 40107

Appellee )

)

v. )

) ORDER

Jaden C. ROSS )

Airman First Class (E-3) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Panel 1

On 18 January 2022, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach

DD Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and Special 

Courts-Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals, signed by

both Appellant and Appellant’s counsel on 18 January 2022. 

On 19 January 2022, Appellant’s counsel submitted a Motion to Amend. In 

this motion, Appellant’s counsel states that the DD Form 2330 “was intended 

to be filed with Appellant having circled ‘withdraw my case from appellate review’ and lined through ‘waive my rights to appellate review,’ just above his 

signature.” Attached to this motion was the first page of the DD Form 2330

reflecting the described modifications. The second page to the DD Form 2330 

was not included with this motion and remains with the 18 January 2022 motion. 

The Government did not submit any opposition.

The court considers the amended first page of the DD Form 2330 as attached to the second page of the DD Form 2330 from the 18 January 2022 motion, and therefore finds the withdrawal substantially compliant with Rule for 

Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1115 (Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2019 

ed.) (2019 MCM)).

Accordingly, it is by the court on this 25th day of January, 2022,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Amend and Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach are GRANTED. Appellant’s case is forwarded to 
United States v. Ross, No. ACM 40107

2

the Appellate Records Branch, AFLOA/JAJM, for further processing in accordance with R.C.M. 1115(f)(3) and 1201 (2019 MCM).

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
HEALTHYLIVINGTIPS

Stay Safe on the Road: Tips for Older Drivers

Aging is a part of life; driving cessation doesn’t have to be.

Consider the following tips to stay safe behind the wheel:

•	Discuss your medication and its effects on driving with your doctor or pharmacist.

•	Ensure that your mirrors and seat are properly adjusted for optimal viewing. 

•	Pay attention to road conditions.

•	Get an annual eye exam and wear contact lenses or glasses as recommended.

•	Plan to go over your route ahead of time.

•	Leave more distance between you and the car in front of you.

•	Eliminate distractions like playing radios, talking on cell phones and eating.

•	Keep car windows clean inside and out.

•	Add a larger review mirror to increase your range of visibility.

•	Limit driving to daytime if you have trouble seeing at night.

•	Stay physically fit – take a brisk walk daily.

•	Stay mentally active – learn a new skill or hobby.

•	Carpool or take public transportation whenever possible.

Useful Resources

National Center on Senior Transportation (NCST) 

Includes resources on transportation options for older adults on how to address 

the need for driving retirement.

http://www.seniortransportation.net 

AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety

Website offers useful tips and tools for older drivers and their families.

http://www.seniordrivers.org

Eldercare Locator 

Find out what is available in your community by contacting the Eldercare

Locator at 1-800-677-1116 or visit www.eldercare.gov.

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT AOA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

ADMINISTRATION ON AGING, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20201

PHONE: (202) 619-0724 | FAX: (202) 357-3555 | EMAIL: AOAINFO@AOA.GOV | WEB: WWW.AOA.GOV |

FACEBOOK: WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/AOA.GOV
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-14   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SAMMY D. BELLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 81 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.3

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of U-Haul
International, Inc., certify that:

1.    the Quarterly Report of U-Haul International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), which this
      statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U-Haul
      International, Inc.

                                            /s/ Edward J. Shoen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Edward J. Shoen
                                            Chairman of the Board and President
                                            November 18, 2002
§ 122.1 Ancillary special services. ( a ) For the market-dominant mail products identified above in part 121, mailers may purchase various ancillary special services products, which are designed to provide electronic access to information regarding delivery-related events or forwarding addresses for individual mailpieces. ( 1 ) For the following special services, the service standard for the electronic provision of delivery-related information is that it be made available to the sender no later than 24 hours after the time of the recorded delivery-related scan performed by the Postal Service on mail for which the following special services have been purchased: Domestic Certified MailTM service, domestic Delivery ConfirmationTM service, domestic and inbound international Registered MailTM service, domestic Collect On Delivery, domestic electronic Return Receipt, and domestic Signature ConfirmationTM scans.
( 2 ) For domestic electronic Address Correction Service, the service standard for the electronic provision of address change information is that it be made available to the sender no later than 24 hours after the time of the scan of the mailpiece by the Postal Automated Redirection System.
( b ) For the market-dominant mail products identified above in part 121, mailers may purchase insurance from the Postal ServiceTM to provide indemnity against loss or damage to the contents of a mailpiece. The service standard for the administrative resolution of domestic insurance claims is that a final agency decision must be transmitted to the claimant no later than 30 calendar days after the date on which the Postal Service has received all information from the claimant necessary for analysis of the claim.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**242 KA 09-02146**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

WILLIAM F. MURRAY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J.), rendered January 27, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of AMERCO, certify that:

1.    the Quarterly Report of AMERCO on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
      September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the date hereof (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AMERCO.

                                            /s/ Edward J. Shoen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Edward J. Shoen
                                            Chairman of the Board and President
                                            November 18, 2002
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this annualreport of ML Select Futures I L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, ChiefFinancial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the generalpartner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 31, 2009      |                 |
|--------------------------------|----------------------|
|                           |                 |
| By                             | /s/ BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis               |                 |
| Chief Financial Officer        |                 |
| (Principal Financial  Officer) |                 |
|                                |                      |  |

 

1

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSemianalytic modeling of aerodynamic shapesEquations for the semianalytic representation of a class of surfaces that vary smoothly in cross-sectional shape are presented. Some methods of fitting together and superimposing such surfaces are described. A brief discussion is also included of the application of the theory in various contexts such as computerized lofting of aerodynamic surfaces and grid generation.Document ID19850012810Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBarger, R. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Adams, M. S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1985Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2413L-15879NASA-TP-2413Accession Number85N21120Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-43-23Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850012810.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Caller,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1.     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

Date:  May 3,2010

 
| /s/Robert C. Caller                                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Caller                                                |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                                   |   |

 

----
0-cr-06240-WPD Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2001 P
0-cr-06240-WPD Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/17/2001 P
#### § 760.1 Treasury Department regulations; applicability to Postal Service.

The provisions of Treasury Department Circular No. 300, 31 CFR part 306 (other than subpart O), as amended from time to time, shall apply insofar as appropriate to obligations of the U.S. Postal Service to the extent they are consistent with the Trust Indenture of the Postal Service and the agreement between the Postal Service and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York acting as Fiscal Agent of the United States on behalf of the Postal Service. Definitions and terms used in Treasury Department Circular 300 should be read as though modified to effectuate the application of the regulations to the U.S. Postal Service.

(39 U.S.C. Secs. 401, 402, 2005)

[37 FR 211, Jan. 7, 1972]
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.01-15 Classification of structures. ( a ) *When will structures be assigned to a Class?* The District Commander will assign structures to Class A, B, or C as part of processing an application for a permit to establish and operate lights and sound signals.
( b ) *In general, where will the different classes of structures be located?* Specific criteria in paragraph (c) of this section may create exceptions, but, in general, structures the farthest from shore are likely to be assigned to Class A and required to have obstruction lights and sound signals that can be detected from the farthest distance. Structures closest to shore are likely to be assigned to Class C and, while subject to requirements to ensure that they are also detectable from a safe distance away, will be required to have the least powerful obstruction lights or sound signals. The location and standards for Class B structures will generally be in between Class A and C structures.
( c ) *What criteria will be used to classify structures?* When assigning a structure to a class, the District Commander will take into consideration whether a line of demarcation has been prescribed, and matters concerning, but not necessarily limited to, the dimensions of the structure and the depth of water in which it is located, the proximity of the structure to vessel routes, the nature and amount of vessel traffic, and the effect of background lighting. ( 1 ) If a line of demarcation has been prescribed, the District Commander will assign those structures seaward of the line of demarcation to Class A. He or she will assign all structures shoreward of the line of demarcation to either Class B or Class C, unless the District Commander determines under § 67.05-25 that the structure should be assigned to Class A because of the structure's proximity to a navigable channel, fairway or line of demarcation.
( 2 ) If a line of demarcation has not been prescribed, the District Commander will assign a structure to Class A, B, or C as he or she deems appropriate.
[USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, May 5, 2004]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The cyclically adjusted andstandardized budget measures**
 
2004: Update | 2005: FebUpdate| 2006: MarUpdate | 2007: FebUpdate
2008: AprOct
 
SuDoc Number:Y 10.25:
Item Number:1005-C-06 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000645229
 
December 19, 2019
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Kilauea Point National Wildlife Refuge land protection planning study :planning update.**
 
Planning Update 4, September 2007
Planning Update 3, May 2007
Planning Update 2, November 2005| Map Insert forPlanning Update 2
Planning Update 1, May 2005| Maps: Alternative B | Alternative C | Alternative D
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.44/3:K 55/
Item Number:0612-C-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001030291
 
June 13, 2018
Case 1:00-cr-00889-ASG Document 119 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:00-cr-00889-ASG Document 119 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2008 Page 2 of 2
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO . A

- 1178

- 18T2
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON , f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW Y ORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, INC., ASSET

- BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006

- 6,
Plaintiff

- Respondent,

v. SADAQAH TRUST and SAFIYYA SHARIF,
Defendants

- Appellants.

_____________________ __________

Submitted September 24, 2019

– Decided Before Judges Fisher and Accurso. On appeal from the Superior Cou rt of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Essex County, Docket No. F

0 25067

- 15. Safiyya Sharif , app ellant pro se. Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jones, PC, attorneys for respondent (Brian Yoder, on the brief).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet , this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.

September 30, 20192 A

- 1178

- 18T2

PER CURIAM In 2006, d efendant Safiyya Sharif entered into a loan agreement for the purpose of buying a home in Newark ; that process included defen dant 's
execution of a mortgage and note to secure r epayment. Defenda nt defaulted in April 2009; the mortgage and note were assigned to plaintiff a few months later. Five years later, plaintiff served defendant with a notice of intent to foreclose
and , in July 2015, co mmenced this foreclosure action

. Defendant filed an answer, but plaintiff success fully moved for the striking of that answer as non
contesting. In March 2017, plaintiff moved for entry of final judgment, and defendant filed opposition. The motion judge rejected defendant's objection to the amount sought , but when the matter was administratively delayed for approximately a year, plaintiff moved again for the entry of final judgment , and defendant again objected. Another motion judge found n o merit in de fendant's objection and final judgment was later entered. Defendant appeals, arguing:
I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT RESPECTFULLY RECOMMEN[]DED FINAL JUDGMENT, WHICH FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ORDER DATED JUNE 9, 201 1 . . . .3 A

- 1178

- 18T2 II. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT WHICH FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIRED AFFIDAVIT OF DILIGENT INQUIRY FORM WITH IT S APPLICATION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO [ RULE ] 4:64

- 2(d).
III. PLAINTIFF FAILED TO FILE THE REQUIRED AFFIDAVIT OF AMOUNTS DUE AND OWING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO [ RULE ] 4:64

- 2(d). We find defendant's arguments to be without sufficient merit to warrant further discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11

- 3(e)(1)(E). In seeking entry of final judgment, plaintiff filed all appropriate sworn statements . And , in opposing the judgment's entry, defendant failed to dispute plaintiff's claim to the amount due,

as recognized by Judge Jodi Lee Alper in the con cise written opin ion attached to her October 4, 2018 order.
Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of AMERCO (the
“Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6,
2008 (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:






(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







AMERCO,


a
Nevada corporation





/s/ Edward J.
Shoen


Edward J. Shoen


President and Chairman of the Board


Date:  August
6, 2008
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5273

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs

AN ACT

To clarify the intention of the Congress with regard to the

authority of the United States Mint to produce numismatic coins, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 5273 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Mint

3 Numismatic Coin Clarification Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF MINT’S AUTHORITY.

5 (a) SILVER PROOF COINS.—Section 5132(a)(2)(B)(i)

6 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking

7 ‘‘paragraphs (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2)’’.

8 (b) PLATINUM COINS.—Section 5112(k) of title 31,

9 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘bullion’’ and

10 inserting ‘‘platinum bullion coins’’.

11 SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL REPORT REQUIREMENT.

12 Section 5134(e)(2) of title 31, United States Code,

13 is amended—

14 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A),

15 by striking ‘‘reflect’’ and inserting ‘‘contain’’;

16 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara17 graph (C);

18 (3) by striking the period at the end of sub19 paragraph (D) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

20 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub21 paragraph:

22 ‘‘(E) a supplemental schedule detailing—

23 ‘‘(i) the costs and expenses for the

24 production, for the marketing, and for the

25 distribution of each denomination of circu26 lating coins produced by the Mint during
3

HR 5273 RFS

1 the fiscal year and the per-unit cost of pro2 ducing, of marketing, and of distributing

3 each denomination of such coins; and

4 ‘‘(ii) the gross revenue derived from

5 the sales of each such denomination of

6 coins.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.