alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-50646

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

DANIEL GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ also known as, Edgar H 

Arreola-Vargas

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

3:04-CR-2560

---------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion

to remand to district court for the purposes of resentencing is

GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s alternative motion

to extend the time fourteen (14) days from the disposition of the

motion to vacate is DENIED as moot.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JESSICA L. JONES,

Petitioner

v.

MARIE H. PLUMER, ADMINISTRATRIX OF 

THE ESTATE OF JAMES J. STOVER,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 48 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23184-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

KELLY LYLES,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint [DE 3] (the “Motion”). The Court has carefully 

reviewed the Motion, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Motion [DE 3] is GRANTED. 

Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before October 28, 2022.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 4th 

day of October, 2022.

Copies to:

Counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-23184-WPD Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/04/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### § 3050.23 Documentation supporting incremental cost estimates in the Postal Service's section 3652 report.

Input data, processing programs, and output of an incremental cost model shall be reported.
The web site for the Prime Supplier Report makes heavy use of Java. Teleport Pro was unable to accurately capture the web site. All pdfs of the reports,  1998 to present, are stored in the "pdfs" file.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

NO. 22-0302

WILLOWTAX, LLC

v.

EVELYN JOYCE ARTERBERRY 

AND ANGELA ARTERBERRY

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

September 2, 2022

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, 

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify 

that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case 

numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under 

the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, WILLOWTAX, LLC, pay all costs incurred on this 

petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this 

the 7th day of October, 2022.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0002]


Arthritis Advisory Committee; Notice of Postponement of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is postponing the 
Arthritis Advisory Committee meeting scheduled for September 13, 2011. 
This meeting was announced in the Federal Register of July 19, 2011 (76 
FR 42715). The postponement is due to the fact that the Agency recently 
received submissions from some of the investigational new drug (IND) 
application holders for anti-nerve growth factor (Anti-NGF) antibody 
drug products that contain large quantities of new information that 
will require additional time for Agency review prior to the advisory 
committee meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip A. Bautista, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-9001, FAX 301-827-8533, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#da9b9b999abcbebbf4b2b2a9f4bdb5ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e5f5f5d5e787a7f3076766d30797168">[email protected]</span></a>, or FDA Advisory 
Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the 
Washington, DC area), and follow the prompts to the desired center or 
product area. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date 
information on this meeting.

    Dated: August 17, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-21380 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Wärtsilä North America Inc. Services

May 18, 2012 Page 1 

### ( 1)

Customer: Transocean Offshore Int.

Attn. to: Mr. Dougie Robertson

Wärtsilä Contact: Mr. Quentin Stewart, Mr. Matts Andersson
Subject: Oxycat Installation

___________________________________________________ ___________________________________

Mr. Robertson,

Wärtsilä has discussed internally the application o f an oxidation catalyst for Transocean. As we ment ioned
we have identified the following concerns.

- It needs to be ensured that the CO reduction limi ts are applicable and acceptable to Transocean, The limit of 70% CO reduction is not preferable as the CO emission from the engine may vary and testing to verify emission values before and after are needed.

- The FA limit of 0.58ppm @ 15% O2 is probably poss ible, but not able to be guaranteed as it is below emission analyzer tolerance

- Can EPA make an exception for existing engines si milar to the “Alaskan relief”?

- Can limits of NOx and CO only be applied instead?

- If only an OxyCat is installed, problems with a y ellow plume will occur; this is caused by oxidation of NO to NO2. Consequently, a SCR for the reduction of NO is needed in diesel applications with OxyCat. The OxyCat is delivered as an integrated pa rt in form of an additional layer in the SCR

reactor

- Can Transocean confirm that the operation range i s 100% to 25% load

Please find enclosed rough indicative dimensions of the NOR SCR with integrated OxiCat in order to get a grip of the size.

Thanks and best regards,

Quentin Stewart

Wärtsilä North America Inc.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATEPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFSARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, David A. Berg, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”), does hereby certifythat to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has causedthis instrument to be executed this 14th day of April, 2010.

 

 
| By:                                               | /s/ David A. Berg |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|    Name: David A. Berg             |              |
|    Title:  Chief Executive Officer |              |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7162

HARVEY R. JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN HUDGINS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00296-JPB-JPM)

Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 26, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey R. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Harvey R. Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting 

Respondent’s dispositive motion and denying relief on Johnson’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition 

and its subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Johnson v. Hudgins, No. 5:19-cv-00296-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. July 21 & Aug. 4, 2020). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.1


 


Share Certificate


 


	Number of certificate	 	Number of shares
	 	 	 
	 

                                                                                 
	 	







 


QILIAN
INTERNATIONAL HOLDING GROUP LIMITED


 


COMPANY
NUMBER [NUMBER]


 


This is to certify that [Name]
of [Address] is the registered holder of [Number] [Share Class] shares of [Value] each being [partly paid to the extent of [amount
in words][amount in numerals] per share]]/[fully paid][and numbered [number]] in the above-named company, subject to the memorandum
and articles of association of the company.


 


	 	[Transfer date]	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 Director	 	Director/ Secretary
Exhibit 99(e)2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi
Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, Michael W. Southern, Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi Power Company for
          the quarter ended March 31, 2003, which this statement accompanies,
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
          Mississippi Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of Mississippi Power Company.


                                            /s/Michael W. Southern
                                              Michael W. Southern
                                    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                                 and Treasurer

Date:  May 13, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mississippi Power Company and will be retained by Mississippi Power
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1171 Copper Canyon, Lake Havasu, Colorado River—Regulated Navigation Area. ( a ) *Location.* The following is a regulated navigation area: ( 1 ) In the water area of Copper Canyon, Lake Havasu, Colorado River, beginning at the approximate center of the mouth of Copper Canyon and drawing a line down the approximate center of the canyon extending shoreward to the end of the navigable waters of the canyon, and comprising a semi-rectangular area extending 30 feet on each side of the line, for a total semi-rectangular width of 60 feet.
( 2 ) This line is more precisely described as: beginning at latitude 34°25′67.6′′ N, longitude 114°18′38.5′′ W, thence southwesterly to latitude 34°25′64′′ N, longitude 114°18′45.7′′ W, thence northwesterly to latitude 34°25′65.6′′ N, longitude 114°18′46.7′′ W, thence southeasterly to latitude 34°25′60.7′′ N, longitude 114°18′42.7′′ W, thence southwesterly to longitude 34°25′51.4′′ N, latitude 114°18′46.2′′ W, thence southeasterly to latitude 34°25′47.1′′ N, longitude 114°18′49.4′′ W, thence to the end of the navigable waters of the canyon.
( b ) *Definitions.* For the purposes of this section: ( 1 ) *Vessel:* Every description of watercraft, used or capable of being used as a means of transportation on the water, and regardless of mode of power.
( 2 ) *Patrol Vessel:* Vessels designated by the Captain of the Port, San Diego, to enforce or assist in enforcing these regulations, including Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, and San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Vessels.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) Vessels, with the exception of patrol vessels, shall not anchor, moor, loiter in, or otherwise impede the transit of any other vessel within the regulated navigation area. Furthermore, all vessels, with the exception of patrol vessels, shall expeditiously and continuously transit the regulated navigation area via the most direct route consistent with navigational safety.
( 2 ) During periods of vessels congestion within the Copper Canyon area, as determined by the Captain of the Port or his or her designated on-scene representative, the regulated navigation area will be closed to all vessels, with the exception of patrol vessels. During designated closure periods, no vessel may enter, remain in, or transit through the regulated navigation area, with the exception of patrol vessels. Designation of periods of vessel congestion and announcement of the closure of the regulated navigation area will be conducted by broadcast notices to mariners on VHF-FM Channel 16 no less frequently than every hour for the duration of the closure period.
( 3 ) Each person in the regulated navigation area shall comply with the directions of the Captain of the Port or his or her designated on-scene representative regarding vessel operation.
[CGD11-97-010, 63 FR 38308, July 16, 1998. Redesignated by USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33642, June 25, 2001]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: DeSotoNational Wildlife Refuge**
 
2012 | 2014| 2015 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.44/2:D 46/
Item Number:0612-C (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001062121
 
July 9, 2018
§ 3006.300 Definitions applicable to this subpart. ( a ) *Commercial use* means a request from or on behalf of a person seeking information for a use or purpose that furthers the commercial, trade, or profit interests of the requester or person on whose behalf the request is made. In determining the applicability of this term, the use to which a requester will put the document is considered first; where reasonable doubt exists as to the use, the Commission may seek clarification before assigning the request to a category.
( b ) *Direct costs* means the expenditures the Commission incurs in searching for, duplicating, and, where applicable, reviewing documents to respond to a request. They include (without limitation) the salary of the employee(s) performing work (the basic pay rate of such employee(s) plus 16 percent to cover benefits).
( c ) *Duplication* means copying the documents necessary to respond to a request. Such copies may be paper, microform, audiovisual, or machine-readable.
( d ) *Educational institution* means a preschool, a public or private elementary or secondary school, an institution of graduate or undergraduate higher education, an institution of professional education, and an institution of vocational education, which operates a program or programs of scholarly research.
( e ) *Noncommercial scientific institution* means an institution, not operated on a commercial basis (as referenced above), which is operated solely for the purpose of conducting scientific research whose results are not intended to promote any particular product or industry.
( f ) *Representative of the news media* means any person or entity that gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the public, uses its editorial skills to turn the raw materials into a distinct work, and distributes that work to an audience. The term “news” means information that is about current events or that would be of current interest to the public. Examples of news media entities are television or radio stations broadcasting to the public at large and publishers of periodicals (but only if such entities qualify as disseminators of “news”) who make their products available for purchase or by subscription or by free distribution to the general public. These examples are not all inclusive and may include alternate media to disseminate news. A freelance journalist shall be regarded as working for a news media entity if the journalist can demonstrate a solid basis for expecting publication through that entity (*e.g.,* by a publication contract or prior publication record), whether or not the journalist is actually employed by the entity.
( g ) *Review* means examining documents located in response to a request to determine whether any portion is exempt from disclosure, and processing or preparing documents for release, but not determination of general legal or policy issues regarding application of exemptions.
( h ) *Search* includes all time spent looking for material responsive to a request, including identification of pages or lines within documents. The term covers both manual and computerized searching.
, $53 I1 

OFFICE OFTHR ATTORNEYGENERAL OFTRXAS 

AUSTIN 

County attoraer 

Palo Pinto, Tuaa 

Ill your lottexR4 

roqttaet w ta a6smb as tr 

poratb6 oity aa 

be aad aooboiv11 i5tatutbu. 

bet ~9uC OppiaiQIl 111 t0 Whbthbr 8X’ A8t th0 v 

aurp bum 3.lm in 80 opamatlng its baaao gn pamonger amr lfbanrer 

4.b tlol@ting Artlolb 805 of the Fend, Ood& Said Irrrtlele 805 '~ 

rbada am.. iollaws: 
Honorable Sdgar A. Naddo~, pag4 a 

*whoever operate8 upaa e public highmy a 

motor vbhiOlb under a liaea8e, however obtalnod, 

for a class other than that to whlob eueh -hicle pronerlg belongs, shall be find not exaeedM two hundred dollars." 

Tho registration of ~motor vehiol4s 14 prorlded for 

In iirtiole ;~blBa, Vernon'q Annotated Civil Statuto8, and Subeaotlons (j) and (n) of i3ectIon 1 th4reor read 8s fOllu44~ 

"(J) 'Pa444nger Car' m44nr 4ny motor r4hlale other thsn 8 motor oyole or a bus a8 8bfiMd 

in this hot, designed or us4d prhudy for th4 

tranrportatlon of per40n4.w 

"(A) Qotor Bus' ah411 Inolude mry rehicle exobpt those op4rat4d by maaoular pwer or 

excluslrely on stationary rails or traake, whloh 

14 used in transporting ger4onr botnssn or thra h 

two or more Inaorporat4d 4ltie8 c&Ad/Or town8 and 7 OT 

villages for otnspsnration (or hire) whether op4roted over fired route8 or titherwire; except mob 

or said rehIole8 a8 are operated ereluslrely rlthin th4 llmlts at incorpomted bit148 and/or tumor 

or suburban addition8 to 8uch tovme.w 

.The vEhlQle8 In que4tloa do not rau wlthla the abme 

derlnitlon or a Wotor bu8*, 8inbe the 68410 are not u4ad in 

tran*porting peraorr between tro or more 

towns or villagee. They do fall 8 

or a *pa44enger oar* and are there 

;~~G.I.ows that there is no 

* 

We note the dotlnltlon of a "motor burr eompanf' In 

artlols Slla, Seotlon 1 (a), Vernon*8 Annotated Ciril Statutes. 

k eonoem carrying persons rot aoapsluation or hire bsaome4 a 

motor bu4 oompany, subjeot to regulation by the Railroad Combaion, when lta motor vehlclee operate bctyond the limit8 and outsIde.tha suburb8 of an inoorporated alty ar tam, whether they 

enter any othsr alty or town, or suburb8 thereof, or not. However, the re@atratlon is44 of theme vehloles are governbd by 
Eonorable Blgar A. Yladdox, page 3 

Artlole 667&, according to the plain and unambiguous term8 of 

whlah the vehicler in queetlon must be olaeaed aa passenger 

car6. 

Tfoure wry truly 

6RLiQb
Exhibit 15.1





February 5, 2010








Aceto Corporation


Lake Success, New York




We are aware that Aceto Corporation and subsidiaries has incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-149586, No. 33-38679, No. 333-90929, and No. 333-110653) our report dated February 5, 2010,relating to the Company’s unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements appearing in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. Pursuant to Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. It should be noted that we have not performed any procedures subsequent to February 5, 2010.





/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP





Melville, New York