alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0540 

FILED 

DEC 2 8 2021 

IN THE MATTER OF: Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court State of IVIontana 

R.J.E., ORDER 

A Youth in Need of Care. 

This matter comes before the Court on the petition of Appellate Defender 

Chad Wright for leave to file an out-of-time appeal on the Father's behalf, pursuant to 

M. R. App. P. 4(6). The petition includes an Affidavit of trial counsel Michael Strand with 

explanation that due to his illness, absence from the office, and miscommunication with 

Father, he did not timely perfect Father's appeal. 

The order terminating Father's parental rights was issued by the Thirteenth Judicial 

District Court, Yellowstone County, on October 4, 2021, in Cause No. DN 17-154. To 

guarantee that Father's right to appeal is protected, the Appellate Defender requests an order 

permitting an out-of-time appeal from that Order. If Father is not permitted to appeal, it 

would constitute a gross miscarriage of justice and unduly punish him. The petition further 

states the Attorney General has no objection. 

Given the importance of the interests at stake for the Father, and without objection, 

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for leave to file an out-of-time appeal is 

GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellate Defender shall have ten days from 

the date of this Order within which to file a Notice of Appeal. The Appellate Defender shall 

immediately order the appropriate transcripts, if they have not been already ordered. 

12/28/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0540
The Clerk of this Court is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of 

record. 't/ Th

DATED this day of December, 2021. 

2
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-13-00785-CV

David Pollitt 

v.

Computer Comforts, Inc.

NO. 11CV1203 IN THE 212TH DISTRICT COURT OF GALVESTON COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

COPIES

MT FEE

SUPP CLK RECORD

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

CLK RECORD

RPT RECORD

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

E-TXGOV FEE

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

$1.00

$10.00

$207.00

$5.00

$5.00

$236.00

$564.00

$5.00

$5.00

$5.00

$5.00

$175.00

$20.00

01/19/2015

01/14/2015

03/17/2014

03/13/2014

12/17/2013

12/10/2013

11/25/2013

10/24/2013

10/08/2013

09/30/2013

09/29/2013

09/25/2013

09/15/2013

09/15/2013

09/13/2013

09/13/2013

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

UNKNOWN

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

APE

ANT

UNK

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT
E-TXGOV FEE $5.00 09/13/2013 E-PAID ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$1,281.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this April 17, 2015.
### Geology of the Libby thrust belt of northwestern Montana and its implications to regional tectonics

By: J. E. HarrisonE. R. Cressman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1524

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American
Express Credit Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Anderson Y. Lee, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |                         
|-------------------- | ------------------------
|/s/ Anderson
 Y. Lee
|                    
|Name:                | Anderson Y.
 Lee        
|Title:               | Chief
 Financial Officer
|Date:                | November 16,
 2009      

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section.
This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
VOC RACT Information

Patterson, Ralph C - DNR to:

Douglas Aburano, Gilberto 

Alvarez, Christos Panos, Steven 

Rosenthal

12/14/2011 09:07 AM

Cc: "Hoch, Joseph A - DNR", "Bashel, Renee L - DNR", "Eckdale, Robert 

B - DNR"

From: "Patterson, Ralph C - DNR" <Ralph.Patterson@Wisconsin.gov>

To: Douglas Aburano/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Gilberto Alvarez/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Christos 

Panos/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Rosenthal/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Hoch, Joseph A - DNR" <Joseph.Hoch@wisconsin.gov>, "Bashel, Renee L - DNR" 

<Renee.Bashel@Wisconsin.gov>, "Eckdale, Robert B - DNR" 

<Robert.Eckdale@Wisconsin.gov>

Hi,

Attached is a table that augments Wisconsin's VOC RACT submittals of November 16, 2010 and 

November 16, 2011. We understand that we need to supply further rule information in February 2012 

once the final rules are published by the Wisconsin Revisor of Statutes.

If you have any questions regarding this information, please let me know.

Thanks.

Ralph

3 Ralph Patterson

Emission Inventory Team Leader

Compliance, Enforcement & Emission Inventory Section

Bureau of Air Management

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

WDNR-AM/7

101 S. Webster St.

Madison, WI 53707

() phone: (608) 267-7546

() fax: (608) 267-0560

() e-mail: Ralph.Patterson@wisconsin.gov

SIPsubmittalTable_2.doc
#### § 3055.24 Special Services.

For each product within the Special Services group, report the percentage of time (rounded to one decimal place) that each product meets or exceeds its service standard.
Statement of Ms. Karen Magliano Regarding Public Notice for the State Implementation Plan Revision forFederal Nitrogen Dioxide Standard Infrastructure Requirements I, Karen Magliano, Chiefofthe Air Resources Board Air Quality Data Branch, have personal knowledge ofthe following facts: The Air Resources Board posted on October 15, 2012, a link to the public hearing notice (AttachmentA) forthe State Implementation Plan Revision forFederalNitrogen Dioxide StandardInfrastructure Requirements at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/planarea/noticesworkshops.htm ARB sent email notifications (Attachment B) on October 15, 2012, announcing the public hearing on State Implementation Plan Revision forFederalNitrogen Dioxide StandardInfrastructure Requirements and provided the link to the Nitrogen Dioxide Infrastructure SIP document at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/sip.htm The emails were sent to members subscribed to the following listservs: the "sip" listserv (State Implementation Plan listserv- 3,943 subscribers), the "board" listserv (Board Meetings and Publ'ic Meeting Notice listserv- 4763 subscribers), and the "desig" listserv (Area Designation listserv- 3,144 subscribers). ARB posted the agenda for its November 15, 2012, Board Meeting (Attachment C) that included the Public Hearing to ConsiderApprovalofthe Proposed State Implementation Plan Revision forFederal LeadStandardInfrastructure Requirements at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/board/ma/2012/ma111512.htm 

### ) 

# 1 I . 

# '/:;]- c I/ • • - -"-.Jo<



# ·~ **~** 

# ·

**~1 Jl-~-··**  ·CGvo 

# l
. (/
. - **~** 

# -

**~** ' . "--- j' /
. .

Karen Magl1ano, Ch1ef Air Quality Data Branch Date: December 12, 2012
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.995 Appomattox River.

The draw of the Seaboard System Railroad bridge, mile 2.5 at Hopewell, shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given to the Seaboard System Agent at Hopewell. However, a drawtender shall be in constant attendance and the draw shall open on signal upon 30 days notice, in writing, to do so from the District Commander.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 1127 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 035 - AD Helicopter Model: Bell Model 430 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 52 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to correct the published Vne and to correct the indicated airspeed. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $46,074 Labor per Helicopter ( 8 x $ 8 5 /work - hour for the replacement) $680 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 46,754 Total US Fleet Cost $2,431,208 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Mark F. Wiley
#### JOSEPH P. MANTON, Respondent, *v.*J. MORTON POOLE, AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS.

*Attachment—affidavit fen', must state a cam.se of action—mere reeital of facts insuffient.*

The affidavit on which an attachment is granted must show that a cause of action exists in favor of plaintiff.

It must state the facts out of which the cause of action arose.

A mere recital of facts without-a direct statement of their existence is insufficient.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside an attachment.

The affidavit set forth, that the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $20,000 damages, and that the grounds.of the plaintiff’s claim were as follows, to wit: “The breach and violation by the said defendants of the covenants, agreements and conditions, on their part to be kept and performed, contained in a certain agreement and patent license, duly made on or about ,the 26tli day of August, 1872, in writing, under seal, of that date duly executed by and between deponent, this plaintiff, as party of the first part thereto, and said defendants as parties of the second part thereto, and particularly the breach and violation by the said defendants of their covenant and agreement therein contained, to use all proper and reasonable efforts, by the employment of agents and canvassers, and by advertising, to make sales of the boilers in the territory, in and as in said agreement and license specified and provided, and to make the patent therein specified remunerative to this plaintiff, said party of the first part thereto, to the damage of the said plaintiff to said sum of $20,000.” This was all that was stated for the purpose of showing the grounds of the claim, or the existence of a cause of action.

*James C.*Carter, for the appellants.

*John S. Washburn,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.

*639Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., concurred.

Order reversed with ten dollars costs, besides disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars posts.
#### § 23.15 Coast Guard ensign.

The Coast Guard ensign has sixteen perpendicular stripes alternate red and white, beginning with the red at the hoist. In the upper quarter, next to the hoist, is the union, being the Coat of Arms of the United States, in dark blue on a white field, half of the length of the flag, and extending down the hoist halfway. The distinctive emblem of the Coast Guard in blue and white is placed with its center on a line with the lower edge of the union and over the center of the seventh vertical red stripe from the hoist of the flag, the emblem covering a horizontal space of three stripes.

[CGFR 57-35, 22 FR 6765, Aug. 22, 1957]
ACL Protection and Advocacy: Traumatic Brain Injury Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2021 Final Allocation

4/23/2021

State/Territory

Protection and 

Advocacy: 

Traumatic Brain 

Injury (PATBI)

Alabama $55,724

Alaska $50,000

Arizona $73,745

Arkansas $50,000

California $318,267

Colorado $62,214

Connecticut $50,000

Delaware $50,000

District of Columbia $50,000

Florida $181,458

Georgia $99,072

Hawaii $50,000

Idaho $50,000

Illinois $114,657

Indiana $69,599

Iowa $50,000

Kansas $50,000

Kentucky $52,420

Louisiana $53,794

Maine $50,000

Maryland $64,391

Massachusetts $70,815

Michigan $94,288

Minnesota $61,310

Mississippi $50,000

Missouri $65,087

Montana $50,000

Nebraska $50,000

Nevada $50,000

New Hampshire $50,000

New Jersey $85,909

New Mexico $50,000

New York $166,103

North Carolina $98,091

North Dakota $50,000

Ohio $107,202

Oklahoma $50,000

Oregon $50,524

Pennsylvania $115,645

Rhode Island $50,000

South Carolina $57,587

South Dakota $50,000

Tennessee $70,335

Texas $238,492

Utah $50,000

Vermont $50,000

Virginia $83,279

Washington $76,295

West Virginia $50,000

Wisconsin $62,697

Wyoming $50,000

American Samoa $20,000

Guam $20,000

Northern Mariana Islands $20,000

Puerto Rico $50,000

Virgin Islands $20,000

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $20,000

TOTAL $3,999,000
#### § 326.2 Policy.

Enforcement, as part of the overall regulatory program of the Corps, is based on a policy of regulating the waters of the United States by discouraging activities that have not been properly authorized and by requiring corrective measures, where appropriate, to ensure those waters are not misused and to maintain the integrity of the program. There are several methods discussed in the remainder of this part which can be used either singly or in combination to implement this policy, while making the most effective use of the enforcement resources available. As EPA has independent enforcement authority under the Clean Water Act for unauthorized discharges, the district engineer should normally coordinate with EPA to determine the most effective and efficient manner by which resolution of a section 404 violation can be achieved.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                              65
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    370,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               448,762
<PP&E>                                         637,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                 408,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 776,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          427,592
<BONDS>                                        154,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     33,542
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   776,652
<SALES>                                        300,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               300,465
<CGS>                                         (82,122)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                264,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            264,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   264,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6). Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Special Emphasis Panel, NINR Career Transitional Award Applications 
(K22s).
    Date: June 21, 2000.
    Time: 3:00 PM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Holiday Inn, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Mary J. Stephens-Frazier, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Nursing Research, National 
Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN32, (301) 594-5971.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institute of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 8, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy
[FR Doc. 00-14963 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 99.5







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Corus Entertainment Inc. (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009 (the “Report”).




I, John M. Cassaday, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(i)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:November 12, 2009


By:  /s/ John M. Cassaday


John M. Cassaday


President and Chief Executive Officer













CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Corus Entertainment Inc. (the “Company”) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009 (the “Report”).




I, Thomas C. Peddie, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(i)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Date:November 12, 2009


By:  /s/ Thomas C. Peddie


Thomas C. Peddie


Senior Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer
2094_Sibley_U123_Part_III_Process_Data_notes.txt

This file contains additional information for the 2094_Sibley_U123_Part_III_Process_Data.xls Process Data_Metals_Testing worksheet: The units 1, 2 and 3 boilers are fueled by 85% a subbituminous coal & 15% bituminous coal blend. The values listed are combined for units 1, 2, and 3. The Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) was calculated by using plant provided data in scfm and average moisture data for the metals test series. Testing was conducted on a common stack for boilers 1, 2, and 3. The folloing files are submitted for individual boiler data if necessary: 2094_Sibley_U1_Part_III_Process_Data.xls contains boiler 1 data 2094_Sibley_U2_Part_III_Process_Data.xls contains boiler 2 data 2094_Sibley_U3_Part_III_Process_Data.xls contains boiler 3 data

Page 1
§ 402.9 Description and weight of cargo. For the purposes of calculating applicable tolls: ( a ) A cord of pulpwood is taken to weigh 1,450 kilograms (3,196.70 pounds); and
( b ) The cargo tonnage shall be rounded to the nearest 1,000 kilograms (2,204.62 pounds.)
[66 FR 15329, Mar. 16, 2001, as amended at 72 FR 4431, Jan. 31, 2007. Redesignated at 74 FR 10679, Mar. 12, 2009, and further redesignated at 79 FR 13253, Mar. 10, 2014, and at 81 FR 14391, Mar. 17, 2016]