alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 2
                                    ---------


                                AUDITORS' REPORT

                  TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF WESTERN OIL SANDS INC.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Western Oil Sands Inc. as at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the consolidated statements of operations and
retained earnings (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Auditing
Standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Western Oil Sands Inc. as at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Calgary, Canada
February 25, 2005
Exhibit 99(b)


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------


The Board of Directors
Household Finance Corporation

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of home equity loans
owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 1999-1 (the loans) has been conducted
by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the
terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 1,
1999 (the Agreement) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management
is responsible for the assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about Household Finance Corporation's compliance based on
our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and in
compliance with the audit guide for audits of non-supervised mortgagees approved
by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (to the extent that the
procedures in such audit guide are applicable to the servicing obligations set
forth in the Agreement), accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,
evidence about Household Finance Corporation's compliance with the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the loans has been
conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance
with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
November 1, 1999 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
                                       KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2003
<PAGE>

                              Management Assertion
                              --------------------


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the servicing of home equity
loans owned by Household Home Equity Loan Trust 1999-1 has been conducted by
Household Consumer Lending, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its
capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer,
in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated November 1, 1999.




/s/ JOE VOZAR                               /s/ JORGE CORDON
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Joe Vozar                                   Jorge Cordon
Chief Financial Officer-                    Managing Director- Operations-
Household Consumer Lending                  Household Consumer Lending


February 28, 2003                           February 28, 2003
-----------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Date                                        Date
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5284

To designate the United States customhouse located at 101 East Main Street

in Norfolk, Virginia, as the ‘‘Owen B. Pickett United States Customhouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2000

Mr. SCOTT (for himself, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. GOODE, Mr.

BOUCHER, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. SISISKY Mr. WOLF, and Mr.

GOODLATTE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States customhouse located at 101

East Main Street in Norfolk, Virginia, as the ‘‘Owen

B. Pickett United States Customhouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States customhouse located at 101 East

5 Main Street in Norfolk, Virginia, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Owen B. Pickett United States Custom7 house’’.
2

•HR 5284 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States customhouse referred to in section 1 shall be

5 deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Owen B. Pickett United

6 States Customhouse’’.

7 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 This Act shall take effect on January 3, 2001.

Æ
#### Hite *vs*Campbell.

Error to the Logan Circuit.

*Principal and Surety. Trusts. Jurisdiction.*

*December*21.

A security may proceed against his principle in chancery for reimbursement of money paid as surety. So may the assignee of the surety it the surety bemade a party.

Judge Graham

delivered the opinion, of the Court.

The note of Joseph Hite, John S. Hite, and Hodges, (the two latter being sureties for the first,) having been fully paid and discharged by Hodges, to whom it was delivered by the payee, and his name afterwards torn from the note, could not be resuscitated by any sale thereof, by Hodges, to one of the payers, so as to make it again a note, binding and valid as such, against the other two obligors. Hodges, the surety, having paid the debt of his principal, had a right of action against his principal for the amount so paid, and might assign his demand so as to authorize Campbell to use Hodges’ name in an action at law, to recover the amount paid. And, as the surety may sue the principal in chanc'ery, We suppose his equitable assignee may maintain, in his own name, a suit in equity against the principal; but in such a suit the surety, Hodges, is an indispensible party, and on being made such, the principal would have an opportunity of relying upon such defence as he may have against the surety, to resist a decree against him. Hodges was, by an amended bill, prayed to be made a party, but no process was executed on him, nor was any warning order had against him. He was not before the Court as a party. Although no assignment or transfer of Hodges’ demand against Hite, is ex*81hibited by Campbell, yet, if the facts exist as stated in his amended bill, he was was authorized to institute this suit.

*jE. M. Sf H. Q. Ewing*for plaintiffs; *B. A. Monroe*for defendant.

The decree must, however, be reversed for want of proper parties; but as the case must be se’nt back for further proceedings, it is proper to suggest the decree which ought to be rendered herein if it shall be proper to decree for the complainant. ' By 'the will of Samuel Hite, one fifth of his land, and also one negro woman, was devised to John S. and James C. Hite, “to be held by them for the benefit of Joseph Hite, allowing him a reasonable compensation for the use of the land and negro yearly.” The rent of the land and the hire of the slaves would, in a short time, realize enough to pay the demand set up by complainant, and where that can be done, in a convenient and reasonable time, it is proper so to decree, rather than to subject to sale the entire estate, and thereby deprive the *cestui que trust*of all future benefit from the property. If the complainant, on the return of the cause, shall show that he is entitled to a decree against Hite, such decree, for the reasons above suggested, should only be, to apply to his own demand, the annual profits of the estate devised, until the whole is paid.

For the reasons suggested, the decree of the Circuit Court is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions for other proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 528

To amend section 353 of the Public Health Service Act to exempt physician

office laboratories from the clinical laboratories requirements of that section.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. ARCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend section 353 of the Public Health Service Act

to exempt physician office laboratories from the clinical

laboratories requirements of that section.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clinical Laboratory

5 Improvement Act Amendments of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF PHYSICIAN OFFICE LABORATORIES.

7 Section 353(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42

8 U.S.C. 263a(d)) is amended—
2

HR 528 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), and

2 (4) as paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) and by adding

3 after paragraph (1) the following:

4 ‘‘(2) EXEMPTION OF PHYSICIAN OFFICE LAB5 ORATORIES.—

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in

7 subparagraph (B), a clinical laboratory in a

8 physician’s office (including an office of a group

9 of physicians) which is directed by a physician

10 and in which examinations and procedures are

11 either performed by a physician or by individ12 uals supervised by a physician solely as an ad13 junct to other services provided by the physi14 cian’s office is exempt from this section.

15 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.—A clinical laboratory

16 described in subparagraph (A) is not exempt

17 from this section when it performs a pap smear

18 (Papanicolaou Smear) analysis.

19 ‘‘(C) DEFINITION.—For purposes of sub20 paragraph (A), the term ‘physician’ has the

21 same meaning as is prescribed for such term by

22 section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42

23 U.S.C. 1395x(r)).’’;

24 (2) in paragraph (3) (as so redesignated) by

25 striking ‘‘(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘(4)’’; and
3

HR 528 IH

1 (3) in paragraphs (4) and (5) (as so redesig2 nated) by striking ‘‘(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘(3)’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61369-CIV-DIMITROULEAS

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SEMBLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP #41,

LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice 

(the “Stipulation”) [DE 21], filed herein on November 29, 2022. The Court has carefully 

reviewed the Stipulation and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Stipulation [DE 21] is hereby APPROVED; 

2. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs 

and fees except as otherwise agreed;

3. The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement 

agreement; and

4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY as moot any pending motions.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida on 

this 29th day of November, 2022.

Case 0:22-cv-61369-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 1 of 2
Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record

Case 0:22-cv-61369-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
Argued and submitted May 2,

reversed and remanded May 24, 1995

#### In the Matter of Fiseha Kidane, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*FISEHA KIDANE, *Appellant.*

(9407-96710; CA A85223)

895 P2d 816

Laura Graser argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Pamela G. Wood, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *State v. Allison,*129 Or App 47, 877 P2d 660 (1994).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5302 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5302

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 1010 Fifth Avenue 
 in Seattle, Washington, as the ``William Kenzo Nakamura United States 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 1010 Fifth Avenue in 
Seattle, Washington, shall be known and designated as the ``William 
Kenzo Nakamura United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William Kenzo Nakamura 
United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 6% UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

      This Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") to 6% Unsecured Promissory Note
(the "Note") is made this 10th of August, 2004, by and between Cyber-Test, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation ("Maker") and LLAB, Inc. (f/k/a Cyber-Test, Inc.), a
Florida corporation ("Payee").

                                   BACKGROUND

      A. Maker, Payee and the Shareholders of Payee entered into an Asset
Purchase Agreement, dated May 27, 2004, pursuant to which Maker purchased the
assets of Payee (the "Purchase Agreement").

      B. In connection with the purchase of the assets, Maker issued to Payee
the Note, in the original principal amount of $547,000, to evidence a portion of
the purchase price for the assets.

      C. In accordance with the terms of the Note and the Purchase Agreement,
the original principal amount of the Note is subject to certain post-closing
purchase price adjustments.

      D. Maker and Payee have agreed on the amount of such post-closing
adjustments.

      NOW, THEREFORE, with the foregoing Background hereinafter deemed
incorporated by reference herein and made part hereof, the parties hereto,
intending to be legally bound, promise and agree as follows:

      1. The Note is hereby amended by reducing the original principal amount
thereof from Five Hundred Forty-Seven Thousand Dollars ($547,000.00) to Four
Hundred Ninety-Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixty-Nine Dollars ($498,469.00).

      2. This Amendment does not represent in any way any new indebtedness or
satisfaction of the indebtedness evidenced by the Note.

      3. All other terms and provisions of the Note will remain in full force
and effect.

      4. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the
same instrument.

      5. Maker hereby directs Payee to attach an original counterpart of this
Amendment to the Note. The Note and this Amendment shall be deemed to be and
constitute a single instrument.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Amendment the
day and year first above written.

                                    CYBER-TEST, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION

                                    BY:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Wayne I. Danson, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                    LLAB, INC. (F/K/A CYBER-TEST, INC.), A
                                    FLORIDA CORPORATION

                                    BY:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lisa Welton, President
Exhibit 32(b)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Yearly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Teresa B. Dickey, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Teresa B. Dickey

Teresa B. Dickey

Principal Financial Officer



April 14, 2005
###### Editorial Note on Part 67

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

#### § 67.05-10 Characteristics of obstruction lights.

All obstruction lights required by this part shall be powered from a reliable power source, including auxiliary power sources as necessary. They shall display a quick-flash characteristic of approximately 60 flashes per minute, unless prescribed otherwise in the permit issued by the District Commander. Their color shall be white when marking Class “A” and “B” structures, and either white or red, as prescribed by the District Commander, when marking Class “C” structures. In determining whether white or red lights shall be authorized, the District Commander shall take into consideration matters concerning, but not necessarily limited to, the dimensions of the structure and the depth of water in which it is located; the proximity of the structure to vessel routes; the nature and amount of vessel traffic; and the effect of background lighting.
§ 20.805 Proprietary information. ( a ) The ALJ may limit introduction of evidence or issue such protective or other orders as in his or her judgment are consistent with the object of preventing undue disclosure of proprietary matters, including, among others, ones of a commercial nature.
( b ) When the ALJ determines that information in a document containing proprietary matters should be made available to another party, the ALJ may direct the party possessing the document to prepare a non-proprietary summary or extract of it. The summary or extract may be admitted as evidence in the record.
( c ) If the ALJ determines that a non-proprietary summary or extract is inadequate and that proprietary matters must form part of the record to avert prejudice to a party, the ALJ may so advise the parties and arrange access to the evidence for a party or representative.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4957

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 2000

Received

AN ACT

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to extend the legislative authority

for the Black Patriots Foundation to establish a commemorative work.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4957 RDS

1 That section 506 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands

2 Management Act of 1996 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 110 Stat.

3 4155) is amended by striking ‘‘2000’’ and inserting

4 ‘‘2005’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 12,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### § 3040.130 General.

The Postal Service, by filing a request with the Commission, may propose a modification to the market dominant product list or the competitive product list. For purposes of this part, modification shall be defined as adding a product to a list, removing a product from a list, or moving a product from one list to the other list.

[81 FR 38957, June 15, 2016. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CV-23604

DANNY FLYNN,

Plaintiff,

v.

ZOETOP BUSINESS CO., LIMITED, a Hong Kong

limited company and SHEIN DISTRIBUTION CORP.,

a Delaware corporation, 

Defendants.

_______________________________________________/

NOTICE OF STRIKING [D.E. 26]

The undersigned counsel hereby strikes the document filed today at [D.E. 26], which was 

intended to be filed in Francis Minoza, et. al. and Laurence Minoza v. Zoetop Business Co. 

Limited, et. al. (Case No. 23-cv-20434), but was inadvertently filed in this proceeding.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: March 23, 2023 Jonathan Woodard

John Cyril Malloy, III 

Florida Bar No. 964,220 

jcmalloy@malloylaw.com

Oliver Alan Ruiz

Florida Bar No. 524,786

oruiz@malloylaw.com

Jonathan Woodard

Florida Bar No. 0096553

jwoodard@malloylaw.com

Cleo I. Suero

Florida Bar No. 1,024,675

csuero@malloylaw.com

MALLOY & MALLOY P.L. 

2800 S.W. Third Avenue 

Miami, Florida 33129 

Telephone (305) 858-8000

Case 1:22-cv-23604-KMM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/23/2023 Page 1 of 1