alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION





I,   
Steven A. Horowitz, certify that:





1. 
 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Genio Group,
Inc.;





2.  
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:





a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;





b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and





5.  
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and





b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.





Date:
      January 13, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Steven A. HorowitzSteven
      A. HorowitzCEO
      and principal
                  executive
      officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL

BOARD (BROMLEY),

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 521 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of November, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED and the Request for Supersedeas Pending Petition for Allocatur is

DISMISSED as moot.
§ 3022.14 Answer contents. ( a ) An answer must: ( 1 ) Contain a clear and concise statement of any disputed factual allegations upon which the answer relies;
( 2 ) Contain a clear and concise statement of any legal interpretation upon which the answer relies;
( 3 ) Admit or deny, specifically and with explanatory detail, each material factual allegation of the complaint. Denials based on information and belief must include an explanation as to why such facts could not reasonably be ascertained by the Postal Service prior to filing the answer. Each fact alleged in a complaint not thus specifically answered shall be deemed to have been admitted;
( 4 ) Set forth every defense relied upon. The answer shall advise the complainant and the Commission fully and completely of the nature of any defense, including factual allegations and law upon which the Postal Service relies. Affirmative defenses shall be specifically captioned as such and presented separately from any denials;
( 5 ) State the nature of the evidentiary support that the Postal Service has or expects to obtain to support its factual allegations and defenses; and
( 6 ) Include a certification that states that prior to the filing of its answer, the Postal Service met or conferred with the complainant to resolve or settle the complaint, whether the Postal Service believes additional such steps would be inappropriate and the reasons for that belief.
( b ) The Commission may waive any of the requirements listed in paragraph (a) of this section to serve the interests of justice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. OR00-5-000]

Take notice that on June 2, 2000, Sinclair Oil Corporation (Sinclair) tendered for filing a complaint against Equilon Pipe Line Company LLC (Equilon).

Sinclair states that it is a shipper of crude oil on a pipeline operated by Equilon that originates at South Terminal, Cushing, Lincoln County, Oklahoma and terminates at West Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Sinclair further states that its crude oil shipments on that line constitute  transportation in interstate commerce and that Equilon has refused to publish a tariff with the Commission to govern the use of the pipeline.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before June 26, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222) for assistance. Answers to the complaint shall also be due on or before June 26, 2000.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14706  Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<CIK>                                  0000002880
<NAME>                                 AIC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         MAR-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                          341
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (96)
<INVENTORY>                                   3,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              6,308
<PP&E>                                          364
<DEPRECIATION>                                  305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                6,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         4,298
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        424
<OTHER-SE>                                    1,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  6,385
<SALES>                                       3,787
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              3,787
<CGS>                                         2,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 3,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  67
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              67
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                     67
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of AMERCO, certify that:

1.   the Quarterly Report of AMERCO on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
     December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
     the date hereof (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AMERCO.

                                             /s/ Edward J. Shoen
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Edward J. Shoen
                                             Chairman of the Board and
                                             President
                                             February 14, 2003
#### ELIZABETH M. MOFFETT, Respondent, *v.*IRA B. TUTHILL, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

Appeal from an order at Special Term, continuing an injunction restraining the defendant Tuthill from proceeding with an action to foreclose a mortgage on plaintiff’s land. It was alleged in the complaint, in the present action, that after the mortgage was given, for the foreclosure of which the action was brought by the defendant Tuthill, an agreement had been entered into by which certain property was to be sold by the defendant Tuthill, and one Dean (not a party to the foreclosure suit), and the proceeds applied on the mortgage held by Tuthill. It further alleged that sufficient-property had been sold to pay said mortgage, and asked for an accounting as to the proceeds of the personal property, and on application at Special Term, an injunction order was granted staying further proceedings in the foreclosure suit. The court at General Term was of opinion that the right of the suitor to the injunction in such a case was no longer an open question, and whether it should be granted or not rested in the discretion of the court at Special Term. * That the defendant Dean, not being a party to the foreclosure suit, could not be held responsible in that suit for any abuse of his trust; and that an accounting being evidently necessary in this case to settle the rights of the parties, it should be had in an action in which Dean was a party.

*Miller &*Tuthill, for the appellant.

*Skinner & Wood,*for the respondent.

*

Erie Railway Company v. Ramsey, 45 N. Y., 637.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Present — Davis, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ.

Order affirmed with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements No. 333-102601, 333-89892, 333-54836, 333-44626, 333-39366, 333-112912, 333-123979 and 333-130043 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 14, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedules of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc. and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.
|                                     
|Beijing China                        
|                                     
|March 14, 2007
#### EDMUND COFFIN, Appellant, *v.*THE CHICAGO AND NORTHERN PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.

*Order of publication*— *when granted*— *Foreign corporation—jurisdiction over.*

This court has jurisdiction of an action, in which the plaintiff is a resident of this State and the principal defendant a corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, brought to procure the sale of certain bonds delivered by the corporation as collateral security for the payment of promissory notes made by it.

By the agreement under which the bonds were transferred as security, the party of the second part was, in case of any default on the part of the corporation, authorized to sell the bonds upon giving certain notice therein specified. *Held,*that this stipulation simply conferred the right to sell and prescribed the mode in which the sale could be summarily made, without either expressly or by reasonable implication excluding other lawful proceedings for the attainment of the same object.

Appeal from an order vacating an order of publication, and setting aside service of summons and complaint made under it.

*Edmund Coffin, Jr.,*for the appellant.

*Henry Day,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., concurred.

Order reversed with ten dollars costs, besides disbursements.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5096 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5096

  To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide 
that certain funds treated as local funds under that Act shall be used 
  to provide additional funding for programs under the Elementary and 
                    Secondary Education Act of 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

Mr. Tierney (for himself, Mr. Nadler, Mr. George Miller of California, 
 Mr. Kildee, Mr. Scott, and Mrs. McCarthy of New York) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide 
that certain funds treated as local funds under that Act shall be used 
  to provide additional funding for programs under the Elementary and 
                    Secondary Education Act of 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF CERTAIN FUNDS UNDER THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES 
              EDUCATION ACT.

    Section 613(a)(2)(C) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education 
Act (20 U.S.C. 1413(a)(2)(C)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); and
            (2) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
                            ``(ii) If a local educational agency 
                        chooses to utilize the authority under clause 
                        (i) to treat as local funds up to 20 percent of 
                        the amount of funds the agency receives under 
                        this part that exceeds the amount it received 
                        under this part for the previous fiscal year, 
                        then the agency shall use those local funds to 
                        provide additional funding for programs under 
                        the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
                        1965, including, but not limited to, programs 
                        that address school safety, teacher quality and 
                        professional development, before and after 
                        school learning opportunities, comprehensive 
                        school reform and literacy, class size 
                        reduction, school construction and 
                        modernization, or related education programs 
                        authorized under Federal or State law.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5016 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5016

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 514 Express Center Drive in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``J.T. Weeker 
                           Service Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

  Mr. Blagojevich (for himself, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
Rush, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Crane, 
Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Porter, Mr. Weller, Mr. Costello, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. 
 Hastert, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Evans, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Phelps, 
 and Mr. Skimkus) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 514 Express Center Drive in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``J.T. Weeker 
                           Service Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. J.T. WEEKER SERVICE CENTER.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 514 Express Center Drive in Chicago, Illinois, and 
known as the Chicago International/Military Service Center, shall be 
known and designated as the ``J.T. Weeker Service Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J.T. 
Weeker Service Center''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

h0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

148488 & (32)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148488

COA: 317648

Monroe CC: 99-030238-FH

DERRICK LAMOND MITCHELL-EL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 26, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

submit a supplemental brief or to remand is DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-CR-20521-DSL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

THEODORE FARNSWORTH 

 

 / 

UNITED STATES’ NINTH RESPONSE TO 

THE STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER

The United States hereby files its ninth response to the Standing Discovery Order (ECF 

No. 8) as to Defendant Theodore Farnsworth and hereby notifies the Court and all interested parties 

that as of September 13, 2024, the following supplemental discovery has been produced to the 

Defendant Farnsworth: 

Description Beginning Bates Range Ending Bates Range Date 

Produced

Federal Bureau of 

Prison Records

DOJ-PROD34-0000000001 DOJ-PROD34-0000001573 9/13/2024 

Convertible Note 

Agreement and 

Proof of Claim

DOJ-PROD34-0000001574 DOJ-PROD34-0000001608 9/13/2024

Text Messages DOJ-PROD34-0000001609 DOJ-PROD34-0000001609 9/13/2024

Interview Reports, 

Notes, and 

Attachments

DOJ-PROD34-0000001610 DOJ-PROD34-0000001665 

9/13/2024

Court Documents DOJ-PROD34-0000001656 DOJ-PROD34-0000001665 9/13/2024

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 141 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2024 Page 1 of 3
2 

The United States recognizes that its obligation to provide discovery is of a continuing 

nature and will supplement this response if and when it obtains additional evidence and materials. 

Respectfully submitted,

 GLENN S. LEON

 CHIEF, FRAUD SECTION

CRIMINAL DIVISION

 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

 

 By: /s/ Lauren Archer 

 Lauren Archer 

 Christopher Fenton 

 Matthew Reilly

Trial Attorneys

 Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 (Archer) 

 United States Department of Justice

 Criminal Division, Fraud Section

 1400 New York Ave., NW 

 Washington, DC 20005 

 (202) 538-3859 

 Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov 

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 141 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2024 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 13, 2024, the foregoing was filed and served on all 

counsel of record using the CM/ECF system.

 /s/ Lauren Archer 

 Lauren Archer

 Trial Attorney

 Florida Special Bar No. A5502575 

 United States Department of Justice

 Criminal Division, Fraud Section

 1400 New York Ave., NW 

 Washington, DC 20005 

 (202) 538-3859 

 Lauren.Archer2@usdoj.gov 

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 141 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2024 Page 3 of 3