alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.32.1

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST

The confidential portions of this exhibit have been filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a confidential treatment request in accordance with Rule 24b-2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. REDACTED PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT ARE MARKED BY AN ***.

LOGO

January 29, 2009

Nancy Wysenski

Chief Operating Officer

Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.

100 Endo Boulevard

Chadds Ford, PA 19317

Dear Mrs. Wysenski:

Ventiv Commercial Services, LLC
(Ventiv) and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Client) are parties to a Sales Representative Service Agreement dated effective as of April 1, 2008 (the Agreement) Terms used herein but not defined here shall have the
meeting set forth in the Agreement. At Clients request, Ventiv and Client have agreed to work together to negotiate an amendment to the Agreement***.

This letter sets forth the mutual agreement of Ventiv and Client to continue to work in good faith on the negotiation and execution of the aforementioned amendment to the Agreement. Ventiv and Client further agree
that if and only if they are unable to reach agreement on the terms of the amendment, Ventiv hereby provides Client with a one-time right to terminate the Agreement in its entirety by providing Ventiv with at least sixty (60) days prior written
notice. As such, in the event Ventiv and Client are unable to reach agreement on the terms of the amendment, Section 11.2(b) of the Agreement shall be amended to provided that Client may terminate the Agreement by providing Ventiv with at least
sixty (60) days prior written notice. For clarification purposes, upon execution of an amendment, the sixty (60) day termination right shall be null, void and of no further effect.



---

Mr. Larry Romaine

January
29, 2009

Page 2

If you are in agreement with
the terms set forth above and desire to proceed on that basis, please have this letter signed in the space provided below on behalf of Client and return an executed copy no later than February 2, 2009.



VENTIV COMMERCIAL SERVICES, LLCBy:

/s/ Paul MignonName: Paul Mignon Title: Chief Operating
Officer


Agreed and Accepted as of the date first written above.



|                                                    |  |                   
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC.                          
|                                                    | 
|By:                                                 |  | /s/ Nancy Wysenski
|Name: Nancy Wysenski Title: Chief Operating
Officer
### MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00308-CR

Gary Ace AVANT , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2004-CR-8479 Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 18, 208 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The trial court imposed sentence on February 29, 2008. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on March 31, 2008. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on April 15, 2008. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. Appellant mailed his notice of appeal on April 21, 2008, and it was, in turn, filed on May 8, 2008. Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time.04-08-00308-CR

-2- We therefore ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant’s attorney has responded that this court does lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and that if Avant wishes to pursue his appeal, he will need to file an application for writ of habeas corpus requesting an out-of-time appeal. Thus, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH
## 2010 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

5-26-2010 

# C .H. v . C ap e H e nlop e n S ch

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 08-3630

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2010 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" C .H. v . C ape H e nlope n S ch " (2010). 2010 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1234. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010/1234

## PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 08-3630
C.H., by and through his parents and next friends, Timothy and Barbara Hayes

v. CAPE HENLOPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT; GEORGE E. STONE, Superintendent of Schools Cape Henlopen School District; DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; VALERIE A. WOODRUFF, Secretary, Delaware Department of Education C.H. Hayes; Barbara Hayes, Appellants
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware

(D.C. No. 1-07-cv-00193) District Judge: Honorable Mary Pat Thynge
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) April 12, 2010 Before: FISHER, HARDIMAN and COWEN, Circuit Judges

.
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion in the above case, filed May 25, 2010, be amended as follows:

## 2 Page 26, the last sentence of the first full paragraph, which read: Accordingly, we also will also affirm the denial of the Parents’ request for tuition reimbursement on equitable grounds. shall read: Accordingly, we will also affirm the denial of the Parents’ request for tuition reimbursement on equitable grounds. By the Court,

/s/ D. Michael Fisher Circuit Judge Dated: 26 May 2010
§ 959.21 Transcript. ( a ) Hearings shall be stenographically reported by a contract reporter of the Postal Service under the supervision of the assigned presiding officer. Argument upon any matter may be excluded from the transcript by order of the presiding officer. A copy of the transcript shall be a part of the record and the sole official transcript of the proceeding. Copies of the transcript shall be supplied to the parties by the reporter at rates not to exceed the maximum rates fixed by the contract between the Postal Service and the reporter. Copies of parts of the official record, other than the transcript, may be obtained by the respondent from the reporter upon the payment of a reasonable price therefor.
( b ) Changes in the official transcript may be made only when they involve errors affecting substance, and then only in the manner herein provided. No physical changes shall be made in or upon the official transcript, or copies thereof, which have been filed with the record. Within 10 days after the receipt by any party of a copy of the official transcript, or any part thereof, a party may file a motion requesting correction of the transcript. The opposing party shall, within such time as may be specified by the presiding officer, notify the presiding officer in writing of his or her concurrence or disagreement with the requested corrections. Failure to interpose timely objection to a proposed correction shall be considered to be concurrence. Thereafter, the presiding officer shall by order specify the corrections to be made in the transcript. The presiding officer on his or her own initiative may order corrections to be made in the transcript with prompt notice to the parties of the proceeding. Any changes ordered by the presiding officer other than by agreement of the parties shall be subject to objection and exception.
[39 FR 33213, Sept. 16, 1974, as amended at 63 FR 66052, Dec. 1, 1998]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1751

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, 

LLC; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; MARK R. 

GALBRAITH; WELLS FARGO; BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank 

N.A., as successor-in-interest, Jointly and Severally, in 

their Official and Personal Capacities; OCWEN LOAN 

SERVICING, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official 

and Personal Capacities,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael, 

BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary 

Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Tysons Corner, 

Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons 

Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Janice Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders

denying her various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. BWW Law 

Group, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-00827-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. June 15 & 29,

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
§ 183.310 Reference areas. ( a ) The forward reference area of a boat is the forwardmost 2 feet of the top surface of the hull or deck as illustrated in Figure 9.
( b ) The aft reference area of a boat is the aftmost two feet of the top surface of the hull or deck, as illustrated in Figure 9.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

139837

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139837 COA: 292349 Muskegon CC: 90-031833-FC WILLIAM DONNELL SAIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and President of AMERCO, certify
that:

      1.    the Quarterly Report of AMERCO on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
            ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), which this statement
            accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of AMERCO.



                                         /s/ Edward J. Shoen
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Edward J. Shoen
                                         Chairman of the Board and President
                                         August 16, 2002
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September 30 , 2009 | /s/ Sterling M. Redfern |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                            | Sterling M. Redfern     |
|                            | President               |

----
Senior Nutrition Program Activity Guide:

Text Challenge

This simple text-based challenge can help seniors engage and socialize, which is important to their 

overall health and well-being. To take part, the only thing needed is a smartphone, tablet, or other 

device with text capability. Whether you make this challenge part of a larger program activity or do it as 

a new fun addition, it’s sure to create new connections.

Coordination

Assign a coordinator to manage the activity.

Figure out the challenge frequency (daily, weekly).

Choose the type or theme of the challenge (physical, 

mental, nutritional, combination, holiday, etc.). 

Create a sign-up sheet and be sure it makes clear that 

phone numbers will be shared with others.

Promote the activity in newsletters, at drive-thru 

events, on flyers with home-delivered meals, etc.

After signup, text a welcome to the group and tell them 

how they can stop taking part if they choose.

Send texts per the challenge schedule and ask group 

members to reply with their answers/results.

Physical Challenge Ideas

• Walk or march: For 15 minutes, in place at home or 

outside if weather permits.

• Wall push-up: Stand arm’s length from wall with 

hands on wall, lean toward wall bending elbows until 

nose almost touches. Repeat 10 times.

• Toe lift: Sit in chair, keep heels on floor, lift toes until 

you feel it in shins. Repeat 20 times.

• Heel lift: Sit in a chair, keep toes and balls of feet on 

floor, lift heels. Repeat 20 times.

• Leg lift: Stand, feet hip-width apart (use support chair 

if needed). Lift left foot, shifting weight to right side. 

Hold for 30 seconds, put down. Lift right foot, hold for 

30 seconds, put down. Repeat 3 times.

• Chair sit: Stand in front of sturdy chair. Sit down in 

chair, then stand up. Repeat 10 times.

• Toe touch: Touch left toes with right hand. Stand up. 

Touch right toes with left hand. Repeat 10 times.

• Snow angel: Stand 3” from wall, with your head and 

back against wall. With hands against wall, palms 

facing out, slowly raise hands above head and lower. 

Repeat 10 times.

Depending on your group and 

challenge, you may want to encourage 

group members to share photos.

Mental Challenge Idea: Riddles

• Text: What vegetable is the King of Rock and Roll? 

Answer: Elvis Parsley

• Text: What did the doctor prescribe to the sick lemon? 

Answer: Lemon-aide

• Text: What kind of fruit do computer nerds love? 

Answer: Macintosh apples

• Text: What fruit is friendly and likes to meet people? 

Answer: Date

• Text: What kind of food is always tardy? 

Answer: Choco-late

• Text: What fruit is always sad? 

Answer: Blueberries

• Text: What table can you eat? 

Answer: Vege-table

• Text: What did the nut say when it sneezed? 

Answer: Cashew

• Text: What day do potatoes hate? 

Answer: Fry-day

The Administration for Community Living (ACL) is an operating division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human 

Services. ACL administers the National Senior Nutrition Program, which is funded by the Older Americans Act. ACL.gov
02/07/201 1 14:0 5 FAX 2024935142 FAA 

v.-.^u.^t/, i ii.zzHivi r M fl Ktlj J UNA L COUNSEL, AEA- 7 

* DMS 

HO. 3059 

21002/003 

P. 2/3 

® 

Eastern Region 

Office of Regional Counsel 

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Via Facsimile 

Chief Administrative Law Judge Ronnie A. Yoder 

Office of Administrative Law Judges 

Office of rCcarings, M-20, 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

RoomE12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FAX 202-366-7536 

federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S, W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

FAX 202-493-5142 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718-553-3259 

Facsimile: 718-995-5699 

•0 

: "1 J.-P 1 

' ^ 

O 

to 

5^ 

o Q 

Re; In tlie Matter of Harrison Yacht Sales, Inc. 

FAA Docket No, CP10EA0006 

FDMS No, FAA-2010.0626 

Dear Chief Judge Yoder and Hearing Docket Clerk: 

This is to confirm that the parties to the above-referenced matter have reached a 

settlement. Therefore, Respondent, Harrison Yacht Sales, Inc. withdraws its 

request for a hearing and the Complainant, FAA, withdraws its complaint. 
02/07/2011 14:05 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS @1003/003 

SON YACHT SALES l^^'^U^y r, j/j ^^ 

Please feel free to call me at (718^ 55^ -^ii-y %r 

concerns. ^ ***^ 35J-3272 if you have 3ny questions or 

Sincerely, 

Jeanine C. Gotimer 

Attorney 

For Complainant: 

JeanirferrGotiirer" 

Attorney 

KespoDdent: 

Oavid Hanison, President 

Hanison Yacht Sales Inc 

106 Wells Cove Road " 

POBox98 

CJrasonville, M D 21638 

FAX 410-827-4830 

i 'ta
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Proceedingsof the symposium on the astronomy and physics of meteors, held at SmithsonianAstrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, Massachusetts, August 28-September 1,1961.**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:7
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001061236
 
May 15, 2018
#### § 3010.320 Settlement conferences.

Any party to a proceeding may submit offers of settlement or proposals of adjustment at any time and may request a conference between the parties to consider such offers or proposals. The Commission or the presiding officer shall afford the parties appropriate opportunity prior to or during the hearing for conferences for the purpose of considering such offers or proposals as time, the nature of the proceeding, and the public interest permit. Unaccepted offers of settlement or adjustment and proposed stipulations not agreed to shall be privileged and shall not be admissible in evidence against any party claiming such privilege.
EXHIBIT 99.3
                                                                    ------------




May 5, 2003


                                                            File No. 2580



U.S. Securities Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Sirs:

We refer to our reports dated January 18, 2000 and March 6, 2001 (collectively,
the "Reports") evaluating certain reserves attributable to Western Oil Sands
Ltd. (the "Company").

We hereby consent to references to our name and to the Reports in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 40-F to be filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We also confirm that we have read the Annual Information Form and that we have
no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information
contained in it that are derived from the Reports or that are within our
knowledge as a result of the services we performed in connection with the
Reports.

/s/ Gary M. Stubblefield
---------------------------
Gary M. Stubblefield
Norwest Corporation
Formerly NorWest Mines Services, Inc.
Independent Mining Consultants
Salt Lake City, UT

May 5, 2003
dvax-ex43_193.htm



Exhibit 4.3

SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RESTRICTIVE LEGEND(S)

 

Number PB-[__][_____] Shares

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

DYNAVAX TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

A Delaware Corporation

 

 

 

THIS CERTIFIES THAT [__________] is the record holder of [_______________] (_____) shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Dynavax Technologies Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder, in person, or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed or assigned.

This certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation and any amendments thereto, a copy of each of which is on file at the office of the Corporation and made a part hereof as fully as though the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws were imprinted in full on this Certificate, to all of which the holder of this certificate, by acceptance hereof, assents.

The Corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so requests, the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this [__] day of [_____], 20[__].

 

***SPECIMEN*******SPECIMEN***

_________________________________________________________________________________

David Novack, Co-PresidentRyan Spencer, Co-President

 

 



 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED _____________________________________________ HEREBY SELLS, ASSIGNS AND TRANSFERS UNTO ____________________________________________ ___________________________ SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE WITHIN CERTIFICATE AND DOES HEREBY IRREVOCABLY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT ____________________________ ATTORNEY TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES ON THE SHARE REGISTER OF THE WITHIN NAMED CORPORATION WITH FULL POWER OF SUBSTITUTION IN THE PREMISES.

 

DATED _____________________________

 

 

(Signature)

 

NOTICE:  THE SIGNATURE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.