alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles A. Rowland, Jr., certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Charles A. Rowland, Jr.                                    
|Charles A. Rowland, Jr.                                        
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer

Date: April 29, 2008
#### ANDREW SMITH, Appellant, *v.*THE MAYOR, Etc., OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

*Overflow from sewer*■— *when city not liable for.*

This action was brought to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff in consequence of water setting back into his basement from a sewer constructed and maintained by the defendant. The overflow occurred on the 4th of July, 1872, and was preceded by a heavy rain, which conveyed so much sand into the sewer as to completely obstruct and prevent the water from passing through it. ■ The evidence did not show it to have been in any manner obstructed before, nor was it improperly constructed or out of repair. Before the sand was washed into it, and after its removal, it appeared to be sufficient to carry off the water flowing into it. • *Held,*that the defendant was not liable.

*Nims*v. *Mayor, etc., of Troy*(3 N. Y. S. C., 5) and *McCarthy*v. *Syracuse*(46 N. Y., 194) distinguished.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.

*Henry Parsons,*for the appellant.

*E. Delafield Smith,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1227

UNITRIN AUTO AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BONNIE SIARRIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00050-GCM)

Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: September 9, 2015

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore B. Smyth, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellant. Jeffrey B. Kuykendal, MCANGUS, 

GOUDELOCK & COURIE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bonnie Siarris appeals the district court’s order granting 

Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company’s motion for judgment on 

the pleadings and denying Siarris’ motion for judgment on the 

pleadings, which related to the parties’ claims for declaratory 

judgment under an insurance policy. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Unitrin Auto & Home Ins. 

Co. v. Siarris, No. 3:14-cv-00050-GCM (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2015). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Explore the Information Exchange","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SMbCk1Eoft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/30-explore\/\">Explore the Information Exchange<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/30-explore\/embed\/#?secret=SMbCk1Eoft\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Explore the Information Exchange” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"SMbCk1Eoft\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of AMERCO
(the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 5, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:






(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







AMERCO,




a Nevada
corporation





/s/ Edward J.
Shoen


Edward J.
Shoen


President
and Chairman of the Board


Date:  November
5, 2008
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Advaxis, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KA for the
year ended October 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:



(1)
the Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date:
    January 20, 2015 | By:    | /s/
    Daniel J. O’Connor               
|-------------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------------------
|                           | Name:  | Daniel
    J. O’Connor                   
|                           | Title: | Chief
    Executive Officer and President
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14847]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 27, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. Pierce County Bancorp, Tacoma, Washington; to acquire Olympic 
Equities Corporation, Puyallup, Washington, and thereby engage in 
making residential and construction loans and other related activities 
related to the extension of credit, pursuant to Secs. 225.28(b)(1) and 
(b)(2) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 7, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-14847 Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
M14004 – Chemical 3Process FlowCONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Texas Department of Aging and Disability 

Services,

 

 Appellant,

v.

Michael Lagunas,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00095-CV

Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2014-DCV-2261)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until August 23, 2019. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jonathan L.R. Baeza, the Appellee’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 23, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of August, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### § 761.8 Servicing book-entry Postal Service securities; payment of interest, payment at maturity or upon call.

Interest becoming due on book-entry Postal Service securities shall be charged in the Postal Service Fund on the interest due date and remitted or credited in accordance with the depositor's instructions. Such securities shall be redeemed and charged in the Postal Service Fund on the date of maturity, call or advance refunding, and the redemption proceeds, principal and interest, shall be disposed of in accordance with the depositor's instructions.
-cr-06239-WPD Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2000 P
§ 203.47 Modifications to non-Federal flood control works. Modifications necessary to preserve the structural integrity of existing non-Federal projects may be constructed at additional Federal and non-Federal expense in conjunction with approved rehabilitation work. The additional Federal cost will be limited to not more than one-third of the estimated Federal construction cost of rehabilitation to preflood level of protection, or $100,000, whichever is less. The modification work must be economically justified. Non-Federal interests are required to contribute a minimum of 25% of the total construction costs of the modification, LERRD's, and any additional funds necessary to support the remaining cost of the modification beyond what the Corps can provide. Engineering and design costs will be at Corps cost. ( a ) *Cash contributions.* Non-Federal contributions will be only in cash. In-kind services are not permitted for modification work.
( b ) *Protection of additional areas.* Modifications designed to provide protection to additional area are not authorized.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 29, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60247

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES ALLEN MORRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:02-CR-74-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Allen Morris appeals his guilty-plea convictions of

possession with intent to distribute in excess of five grams of a

mixture and substance containing cocaine base and being a felon

in possession of a firearm. Morris argues that the district

court abused its discretion in denying without an evidentiary

hearing his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. 

Morris’s argument touches only on two of the seven pertinent

factors, i.e., whether he had close assistance of counsel and
No. 03-60247

-2-

whether his plea was knowing and voluntary. See United States v.

Carr, 740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1984). There is no support

in the record for his assertion that he did not have close

assistance of counsel. Morris stated at the guilty plea hearing

that he was satisfied with his counsel’s representation and that

his counsel had discussed his entire case with him. Moreover,

Morris made no assertion that it was his belief that he would be

able to appeal the denial of his suppression motion until he

moved to withdraw his pleas. It was Morris’s burden to establish

a “fair and just” reason for withdrawing his guilty pleas, and he

has failed to do so. See United States v. Brewster, 137 F.3d

853, 858 (5th Cir. 1998).

Morris also argues that the district court erred in denying

his suppression motion. By entering an unconditional plea,

Morris waived his challenge to the district court’s denial of his

suppression motion. See United States v. Smallwood, 920 F.2d

1231, 1240 (5th Cir. 1991). Therefore, we may not review his

appeal of the denial of the suppression motion. See United

States v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d 927, 931 (5th Cir. 1995). The

district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Order entered July 25, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01617
- CR JESSE LEE AUSTIN, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416
- 82407
- 2013



### O RDER Appellant has informed the Court that he wishes to file a pro se response to the Anders brief filed by appellate counsel. Counsel previously informed the Court that counsel sent appellant a copy of the record. Accordingly , a ppellant’s pro se response is due by SEPTEMBER 10, 2014

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order , by first

- class mail, to Jesse Austin, TDCJ No. 1889220, Buster Cole Unit, 3801 Silo Road, Bonham, Texas 75418.
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 2 2

- 1278

JAMES ADEYEMI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL FOR BOOTH POLICE OFFICERS, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Stephanie A. Gallagher , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 02060

- SAG )

Submitted : October 13, 2022 Decided: October 17, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James Adeyemi , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1278 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/17/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CUR IAM: James Adeyemi appeals the district court’s order s dismissing his civil complaint and denying his subsequent motion s for recusal and to alter or amend the judgment . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s
orders

. Adeyemi v. Off. o f Gen

. Coun s. f or Booth Police Officers , No. 1:21

- cv - 02060

- SAG (D. Md. filed Dec. 2 0 , 2021 & entered Dec. 21, 2021; Mar. 8, 2022 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1278 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/17/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 30, 1997 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000004319
<NAME> APPAREL AMERICA, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                              14
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                       386
<INVENTORY>                                     14,548
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,257
<PP&E>                                           8,125
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,349
<BONDS>                                         10,554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,603
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           989
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,253)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,242
<SALES>                                         39,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,290
<CGS>                                           29,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    98
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    562
<INCOME-TAX>                                        27
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                535
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
EX-23
      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors
5G Wireless Communications, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's
previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-130752)
of 5G Wireless Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 13,
2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of 5G Wireless
Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash
flows for each of the years in the two-year period then ended,
included in this Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K .

/s/  Squar, Milner, Reehl & Williamson, LLP
Newport Beach, California
March 31, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Granite Cliffs  Incorporated on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2002,  as filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, B.
Stephen Bailey, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8023

TERRY A. HENDRICKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

B. THOMAS REED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-01-819-2)

Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry A. Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Terry A. Hendricks, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. See Hendricks v. Reed, No.

CA-01-819-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED