alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 66.10-15 Aids to navigation. ( a ) USWMS aids to navigation may have lateral or cardinal meaning.
( b ) On a well defined channel including a river or other relatively narrow natural or improved waterway, an aid to navigation shall normally be a solid colored buoy. A buoy which marks the left side of the channel viewed looking upstream or toward the head of navigation shall be colored all black. A buoy which marks the right side of the channel viewed looking upstream or toward the head of navigation shall be colored all red. On a well defined channel, solid colored buoys shall be established in pairs, one on each side of the navigable channel which they mark, and opposite each other to inform the user that the channel lies between the buoys and that the user should pass between the buoys.
( c ) On an irregularly defined channel, solid colored buoys may be used singly in staggered fashion on alternate sides of the channel provided they are spaced at sufficiently close intervals to inform the user that the channel lies between the buoys and that the user should pass between the buoys.
( d ) Where there is no well-defined channel or when a body of water is obstructed by objects whose nature or location is such that the obstruction can be approached by a vessel from more than one direction, supplemental aids to navigation having cardinal meaning (i.e., pertaining to the cardinal points of the compass, north, east, south, and west) may be used. The use of an aid to navigation having cardinal meaning is discretionary provided that the use of such a marker is limited to wholly State owned waters and the State waters for private aids to navigation as defined and described in this part.
( e ) Aids to navigation conforming to the cardinal system shall consist of three distinctly colored buoys. ( 1 ) A white buoy with a red top may be used to indicate to a vessel operator that the operator must pass to the south or west of the buoy.
( 2 ) A white buoy with a black top may be used to indicate to a vessel operator that the operator must pass to the north or east of the buoy.
( 3 ) In addition, a buoy showing alternate vertical red and white stripes may be used to indicate to a vessel operator that an obstruction to navigation extends from the nearest shore to the buoy and that the operator must not pass between the buoy and shore. The number of white and red stripes is discretionary, provided that the white stripes are twice the width of the red stripes.
[CGFR 66-32, 31 FR 10321, July 30, 1966, as amended by CGD 97-018, 63 FR 33574, June 19, 1998; USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24982, May 5, 2004]
#### § 281.1 Notification of firm mailers.

Whenever bulk firm mail shipments are involved in transportation accidents or catastrophes, such as train or highway accidents, fire, flood, etc., it will be the responsibility of the sectional center director of customer services at the office of mailing to give known mailers timely notification of the incident and its effect on their mail shipment(s).

[39 FR 20974, June 17, 1974, as amended at 40 FR 2179, Jan. 10, 1975]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information excerpted from 
         Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              29,214
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       95,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12,583
<INVENTORY>                                         46,529
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   167,223
<PP&E>                                             142,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                      56,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     362,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               53,340
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         14,950
<COMMON>                                             3,426
<OTHER-SE>                                         (48,004)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       362,507
<SALES>                                            152,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   328,414
<CGS>                                               87,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      208,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   104,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1,713
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  23,556
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (11,149)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (307)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (10,842)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (12,096)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.25)

        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO: 22-CV-81294-AMC

DONALD J. TRUMP,

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO FILE PRIVILEGE REVIEW 

TEAM LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 12, 2022, UNDER SEAL

The United States of America, through the undersigned attorneys assigned to its Privilege 

Review Team, respectfully move this Court to file under seal a Privilege Review Team letter that 

was transmitted to the Special Master and Plaintiff’s counsel on November 12, 2022.

[1] The 

Privilege Review Team letter should be sealed because it refers to a one-page document over 

which, in part, Plaintiff seeks to assert attorney-client privilege. See DE:91 at ¶ 9 (directing Special 

Master to file under seal any potentially privileged . . . material that is submitted to be filed under 

seal).

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully request permission to file this letter under 

[1] On November 14, 2022, Plaintiff’s counsel confirmed by email that Plaintiff does not 

object filing the letter under seal.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 184 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2022 Page 1 of 2
seal for preservation in the record.

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: /s/Anthony W. Lacosta 

Anthony W. Lacosta

Managing Assistant United States Attorney - WPB

Court. No. A5500698

500 S. Australian Avenue (4th Floor)

West Palm Beach, Florida 33132 

Ph: (561) 209-1015

email: anthony.lacosta@usdoj.gov

/s/Benjamin J. Hawk_____________

Benjamin J. Hawk

Deputy Chief for Export Control and Sanctions

National Security Division

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20530

New Jersey Bar No. 030232007

Ph: (202) 307-5176

Email: Benjamin.Hawk@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTFIY that on November 15, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF.

/s/Anthony W. Lacosta 

Anthony W. Lacosta

Managing Assistant United States Attorney - WPB

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 184 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/15/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 3040.173 Docket and notice. The Commission will establish a docket for each request to modify the market dominant list or the competitive product list, promptly publish notice of the request in the Federal Register, and post the filing on its website. The notice shall include: ( a ) The general nature of the proceeding;
( b ) A reference to legal authority to which the proceeding is to be conducted;
( c ) A concise description of the proposals for changes in the Mail Classification Schedule;
( d ) The identification of an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in the docket;
( e ) A specified period for public comment; and
( f ) Such other information as the Commission deems appropriate.
[72 FR 63698, Nov. 9, 2007. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 9615, 9660, Feb. 19, 2020]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JUSTIN ANTHONY GIOVINAZZO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-671

[May 31, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 562014CF003058A.

Justin Anthony Giovinazzo, Lawtey, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:22-cv-23485-JAL   Document 38-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023   Page 1 of 7

Case 1:22-cv-23485-JAL   Document 38-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023   Page 2 of 7

Case 1:22-cv-23485-JAL   Document 38-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023   Page 3 of 7

Case 1:22-cv-23485-JAL   Document 38-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023   Page 4 of 7

Case 1:22-cv-23485-JAL   Document 38-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023   Page 5 of 7

Case 1:22-cv-23485-JAL   Document 38-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023   Page 6 of 7

Case 1:22-cv-23485-JAL   Document 38-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/14/2023   Page 7 of 7
1

Energy Efficiency Battery Charger System Test Procedure

Date: April 13, 2011

Time: 1:00-2:00 PM Eastern

Location: Phone

Organizer: Henry ML Wong

Purpose: Provide clarifications and feedback on Battery Charger test methodologies as applied 

to upcoming US DOE rulings in this product category. 

Attendees

Name Affiliation

Henry ML Wong Intel Corporation

Victor Petrolati U.S. Department of Energy

Jim Kardach Intel Corporation

Matthew Nardotti Navigant Consulting

Ken Rider CA Energy Commission

Meeting Summary

 Intel reviewed the documented feedback (attached) on the battery charger test methodology as 

described in the CA Energy Commission document, Energy Efficiency Battery Charger System 

Test Procedure Version 2.2, January 26, 2009.

 Particular focus and concern was placed on evaluating energy efficiency of the battery charging 

system for products where battery charging was an embedded feature and not its primary 

function. Devices in this category include computer notebooks, netbooks, tablets and other 

mobile computing devices.

 Intel reviewed the complexity of separating the battery charging from the primary functions of 

these mobile computers. Intel noted key considerations including:

o Overriding “smart” batteries to fully charge or discharge the unit may impact the safety or 

functionality of the product

o Battery removal on tablet and future mobile computing form factors may be impossible 

without destroying the product functionality

o If the DOE is considering yearly charger energy efficiency, the calculations should 

remove the energy related to operate the main functions of the computer.

 Intel introduced concerns with test procedures on the No-Battery and Off Mode tests. The setup 

for Category 3 Products should comprehend integrated charger devices (like notebooks) and 

allow testing similar to ENERGY STAR for computers, additional with:

o Battery removed, or

o Battery fully charged (if battery can’t be removed)

Otherwise, only the No-Load power of the EPS get’s measured, which doesn’t reflect the Off 

power of the integrated device.

 Intel reviewed documentation, definitions and table references that Victor Petrolati indicated 

would likely get addressed in the DOE ruling. Victor noted that some of the substantive issues 

listed may not be addressed in the test methodology ruling.

 Henry and Victor agreed that although some of the issues may not be addressed in the test 

methodology ruling, the specification limit setting procedures may be able accommodate adders 

for functions outside of battery charging.
2

Next Steps

 Henry Wong will revise and update the document for official entry to the docket on battery 

chargers.

 Henry Wong to work with ITI to engage with the DOE on addressing these concerns in either the 

test methodology or limit setting rulings on Battery Charger Systems.
§ 3000.112 Office of Accountability and Compliance. ( a ) The Office of Accountability and Compliance is responsible for technical analysis and the formulation of policy recommendations for the Commission in both domestic and international matters, including those governed by the Universal Postal Union.
( b ) The Office of Accountability and Compliance provides the analytic support to the Commission for the review of rate changes, negotiated service agreements, classification of products, the Annual Compliance Determination, the Annual Report, changes to postal services, post office closings and other issues which come before the Commission. The functional areas of expertise within this office are: ( 1 ) The economic analysis of the market for postal services including the alternative sources for such services and the users of the service;
( 2 ) The analysis of the operational characteristics of the postal system and its interface with various segments of the economy; and
( 3 ) The analysis of the costs of operating the Postal Service and how such costs are influenced by operational characteristics, changes in volume, and changes in other relevant factors.
( c ) These functional activities are combined in the evaluation of the Postal Service's proposed rates, proposed service changes, proposed changes to the Mail Classification Schedule, and product list designations, as well as formal complaints, the Annual Compliance Determination, and all other proceedings, reports, and filings before the Commission requiring such analysis.
( d ) The Office of Accountability and Compliance also collects, analyzes, and periodically summarizes financial and various other statistical information for use in its ongoing activities and for the development of future methods, techniques, and systems of analysis and reporting.
[78 FR 27045, May 9, 2013. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 9615, 9616, Feb. 19, 2020]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5230

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to designate

Edmonson, Hart, and Metcalfe Counties, Kentucky, as part of the Appalachian region.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 2000

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of

1965 to designate Edmonson, Hart, and Metcalfe Counties, Kentucky, as part of the Appalachian region.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 403 of the Appalachian Regional Develop4 ment Act of 1965 (40 U.S.C. App.) is amended in the

5 third undesignated paragraph relating to Kentucky—

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘Edmonson,’’ before ‘‘Elliott,’’;

7 (2) by inserting ‘‘Hart,’’ after ‘‘Harlan,’’; and

8 (3) by inserting ‘‘Metcalfe,’’ after ‘‘Menifee,’’.

Æ
FILED WITH FAA AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION BR



### lOl~ 

## OEG 

# 31 PPl 2 Yli OKLAHOMA CITY OKLAHOMA . ' / jl

### > ,-;
§ 3060.43 Annual transfer from competitive products fund to Postal Service fund. ( a ) The Postal Service must on an annual basis transfer the assumed Federal income tax due on competitive products income from the Competitive Products Fund to the Postal Service Fund.
( b ) If the assumed taxable income from competitive products for a given fiscal year is positive, the assumed Federal income tax due, calculated pursuant to § 3060.40, shall be transferred to the Postal Service Fund no later than the January 15 following the close of the relevant fiscal year.
( c ) If assumed taxable income from competitive products for a given fiscal year is negative, and: ( 1 ) A payment was made to the Postal Service Fund for the previous tax year, a transfer equaling the lesser of the amount paid into the Postal Service Fund for the past 2 tax years or the amount of the hypothetical tax on the loss shall be made from the Postal Service Fund to the Competitive Products Fund no later than the January 15 following the close of the relevant fiscal year; or
( 2 ) No payment has been made into the Postal Service Fund for the previous 2 tax years, the loss may be carried forward and offset against any calculated assumed Federal taxable income on competitive products income for 20 years.
[73 FR 79261, Dec. 24, 2008, as amended at 84 FR 31738, July 3, 2019]
§ 912.6 Administrative claim; who may file. ( a ) A claim for injury to or loss of property may be presented by the owner of the property, his duly authorized agent, or legal representative.
( b ) A claim for personal injury may be presented by the injured person, his duly authorized agent, or legal representative.
( c ) A claim based on death may be presented by the executor or administrator of the decedent's estate, or by any other person legally entitled to assert such a claim in accordance with applicable State law.
( d ) A claim for loss wholly compensated by an insurer with the rights of a subrogee may be presented by the insurer. A claim for loss partially compensated by an insurer with the rights of a subrogee may be presented by the parties individually as their respective interests appear, or jointly.
( e ) A claim presented by an agent or legal representative shall be presented in the name of the claimant, be signed by the agent or legal representative, show the title or legal capacity of the person signing, and be accompanied by evidence of his authority to present a claim on behalf of the claimant as agent, executor, administrator, parent, guardian, or other representative.
[36 FR 12448, June 30, 1971, as amended at 45 FR 43720, June 30, 1980]
Accountants' Consent



The Board of Directors
NELNET Student Loan Corporation-2:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (File No.
333-3865) on Form S-3 of NELNET Student Loan Corporation-2 of our report dated
March 8, 2002, relating to the balance sheets of NELNET Student Loan
Corporation-2 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of
operations, stockholder's equity (deficit) and cash flows for year ended
December 31, 2001 and for the period June 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000,
which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of
NELNET Student Loan Corporation-2.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Lincoln, Nebraska
March 26, 2002
EXHIBIT A

Case 1:22-cv-23342-MD Document 215-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/01/2024 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

ex rel. WADE RINER, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

HUNTERS RUN PROPERTY 

OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., 

et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 1:22-cv-23342-MD 

EXHIBIT A IDENTIFYING JOINING DEFENDANTS PER DOCKET NO. 132, 135 

Pursuant to this Court’s direction [DE 132, 135], the twenty-seven (29) defendants listed 

below join in the Joint Motion to Dismiss, dated April 1, 2024. 

Frenchmans Reserve Country Club Wycliffe Gold and Country Club Homeowners 

Association, Inc. 

Mizner Country Club, Inc. Township Community Master Association, Inc.

Mirasol Club & Association, Inc. Willoughby Golf Club, Inc.

Aragon Condominium Association of Boca 

Raton, Inc.

Williams Island Property Owner’s Association, 

Inc. 

The Grand Condominium Association, Inc. Anchorage Resort and Yacht Club 

Condominium Association

Crossings Homeowners Association, Inc. Bal Harbour 101 Condominium Association, 

Inc.

Deering Bay Yacht and Country Club, Inc. Bocaire Country Club, Inc.

Fortune House Condominium Association, 

Inc.

Doral Park Country Club Association 

Frenchman’s Creek, Inc. Lake Clarke Gardens Condominium, Inc.

Leverett House Condominium Association, 

Inc.

Meadowood Golf & Tennis Club Inc.

Ocean Club Community Association, Inc. Pine Island Ridge Country Club Inc.

Palm Beach Towers Condominium 

Association, Inc.

Quail Ridge Property Owners Association Inc.

Yacht & Country Club, Inc. Royal Palm Improvement Association, Inc. 

Turnberry Ocean Colony Master Association, 

Inc. 

Turnberry Towers Condominium Association, 

Inc. 

Old Palm Golf Club, Inc.

Case 1:22-cv-23342-MD Document 215-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/01/2024 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99(a)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alberto-Culver Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard B. Bernick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Howard B. Bernick


President and Chief Executive Officer


August 8, 2002
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook in Hotel Occupations: Duties, Qualifications, Outlook, Earnings, Working Conditions

              																	Gottlieb, Herbert L.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment Outlook in Hotel Occupations: Duties, Qualifications, Outlook, Earnings, Working Conditions : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 905*,												Washington: 								U.s. G.P.O., 										1947,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4352,			accessed on September 17, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER