FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Common Constraints on Creativity

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Common Constraints on Creativity Common Constraints on CreativityADR2022-02-17T19:11:47-05:00
			
			Common Constraints on CreativityCommercial disputes between private sector parties often lead to creative deals that address past conflicts through future business arrangements.  Commercial parties use these deals to create value that mitigates past injury.  Agencies and their contracting partners, however, must understand that many creative options available in the private sector are not available to all agencies.  The table below, which is not exhaustive, gives several examples of constraints imposed on federal agencies.
**Private Sector Methods**
**Federal Sector Limitations**Award future contract to solve current dispute. Variations include: 
Greatly increasing the volume of existing work
Greatly changing an existing scope of work
Competition in Contracting Act (CICA):
Civilian agencies must use “full and open competition,” 41 USC 3301.
DoD must use “full and open competition,” 10 USC 2304.
Implemented in FAR Part 6.
Limited exceptions found in FAR Subparts 6.2 (small businesses) and 6.3 (various).Substantially shift financial risk to the purchaser, through an indemnity or similar agreement.
Without specific statutory authority, government officials cannot promise to indemnify another party “where the amount of possible liability is indefinite, indeterminate, or potentially unlimited.”  Principles of Federal Appropriations Law, Vol. II, 3rd ed., at 6-59 to 6-60 (Feb. 2006) (citing 31 USC 1341 (Antideficiency Act) and 41 USC 11 (Adequacy of Appropriations Act)).  The possibility of a “coercive deficiency” is also discouraged.  59 Comp. Gen. 369 (1980).Exclusive dealing agreements
CICA, cited above, limits this possibility by requiring full and open competition.Very long multi-year purchasing agreements
10 USC 2306b limits multi-year contracts to 5 years, and imposes other substantial limitations.
Future appropriations might not be made, reducing the value of deals to contractors.Promises to use specified products
Brand name or equal rules found in FAR Subpart 11.1.Exchanges of goods.
Significantly limited by 10 USC 2571.  Purpose generally must relate to a public good like historical collections, police, and firefighters.Mutual sale of goods.
The government does not make a lot of items.  But when it does, the government may only sell if the item is not available from a US commercial source.  10 USC 2563.Product endorsements
Office of Government Ethics regulations discouraging endorsements.  *See* 5 CFR 2635.702. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508