alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary B. Horton, Treasurer of AMERCO, certify that:

1.    the Quarterly Report of AMERCO on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
      September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the date hereof (the "Report"), which this statement accompanies, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AMERCO.

                                            /s/ Gary B. Horton
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Gary B. Horton
                                            Treasurer
                                            November 18, 2002
H. R. 5234

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To amend the Hmong Veterans’ Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the applicability

of that Act to certain former spouses of deceased Hmong veterans.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HMONG VETERANS’ NATURALIZATION ACT

OF 2000 TO CERTAIN FORMER SPOUSES OF DECEASED

HMONG VETERANS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2 of the Hmong Veterans’ Naturalization Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–207; 114 Stat. 316; 8 U.S.C.

1423 note) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end;

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end

and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

‘‘(3) who—

‘‘(A) satisfies the requirement of paragraph (1)(A); and

‘‘(B) is the surviving spouse of a person described in

paragraph (1)(B) which described person was killed or died

in Laos, Thailand, or Vietnam.’’.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3 of such Act is

amended by striking ‘‘or (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘, (2), or (3)’’.

SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION.

Section 6 of such Act is amended by adding at the end the

following new sentence: ‘‘In the case of a person described in section

2(3), the application referred to in the preceding sentence, and
H. R. 5234—2

appropriate fees, shall be filed not later than 18 months after

the date of the enactment of this sentence.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RTI Biologics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. Rose, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the
period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 16, 2009



/s/ Thomas F. RoseName:

Thomas F. RoseTitle:

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to RTI Biologics, Inc. and will be retained by RTI Biologics,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 762.42 Request for substitute disbursement postal money orders; requirements for undertaking of indemnity. In the case of a request for a substitute Disbursement Postal Money Order: ( a ) An undertaking of indemnity in penal sum equal to the amount of the Disbursement Postal Money Order shall, unless otherwise provided in this section, be executed by the claimant, as may be required by the Postal Service, and submitted to the Money Order Division.
( b ) Unless the Postal Service determines that an undertaking of indemnity is essential in the public interest, no undertaking of indemnity shall be required in the following classes of cases: ( 1 ) If the Postal Service is satisfied that the loss, theft, destruction, mutilation or defacement occurred without fault of the owner or holder, and while the Disbursement Postal Money Order was in the custody or control of the Postal Service;
( 2 ) If substantially the entire Disbursement Postal Money Order is presented and surrendered by the owner or holder and the Postal Service is satisfied as to the identity of the Disbursement Postal Money Order presented and that any missing portions are not sufficient to form the basis of a valid claim against the Postal Service;
( 3 ) If the Postal Service is satisfied that the original Disbursement Postal Money Order is not negotiable and cannot be made the basis of a valid claim against the Postal Service; or
( 4 ) If the amount of the Disbursement Postal Money Order is not more than $200.
UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURTFORSOUTHERNDISTRitToFFLORI;AHCOURTORDER/MINUTESH

U.S.MAGISTRATNJUDGEJARZD M.STRAUSS-FORT LAUDERDALE,FLORIDA(203-D)

' os'p'T: u ssn x sclaiLsR-zlvstERMAxxto: .'.''

AUSA: BLATTA(J.USTYNOSKIDUTYAUSA)

USPO:

CASENO: 22-6481-STM USS

AW Y:

VIOL:

ZI:U.S.C.j846

PROCEEDING: INITIAL APPEARANCE RECOMM ENDED BONb:

BOND/PTD HEARING IIELD -yes/no COUNSELAPPOINTED:

' . .

BONDSET@: Tobecosignedbyq

CJA:RIJBEN GARCIA

A1lstandardconditions

Donotencumber property.

Surrenderand/ordonot(jbtailtpassports/travel .

documents. '

.

' . .

**SPANISH INTERPRETER REQUESTED **

DEFENDANTPRESEYT> COURT .

ADVISEDOFCIIARGES.REQUESTUOURTTOAPPUINT

Q

. Random urinetestingbyPretrialServices.

Trdatmentasdeemednecessary.'

Q Maintainorseekfu1-timeémployment.

. Q Nocontactwithvictims/wimesses.

Nofirearms.

Q ElectronicM onitoring:

Travelextendedto:

FOVND ENDIGENT.CJA RUBEN GARCLKAPPOMNTED.

GOVEKNMENTRECPMMENUSPTD .

(INsbETAINERINPLACE)

RpttoPTSasbirected/ or- x'saweek/monthbyphone;-

x'saweek/monthinperson. COUNSEL.SW ORN/TESTFOR COIJRTAPPOW TMENT

Q Other:

NEXTCOURTAPPEARANCE: DATE: TM : . FUDGE: PLACE:

REPORT RE

COUNSEL:

PTb/BOND

HEAZ NG: MONDAYOCTOBER242022AT9AM DUTYMAGISTRATE

ARRM GN 0R REM OVAL:

. M ONDAY OCTOBER 312022AT 11AM DUTY M AGISTRATE

PRELIM/EXAM HRG NONDAYOCTOBER312022AT11AMDUTYW GIWRATE

10/17/22 TlME: 11:0. 0AV FTL/TAPZ/# Begin DAR : '

'

k**REcoRo>m IN cotTRTRo

W

oM sfaa-o..

' V

p:Mtyu'rEsl

***TI.I.tTIMEFROM TooAvTlmovtm THERE-SCHEDVLEDDATEIskxclatmEoFROM THEDEADLINEFoRTRIALAs

cowtptTv otT#bERTIIEslu ovTRIALAcT***(vEsouxo)DAR:11:27:10-11:55:07

Case 0:22-mj-06481-JMS Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/17/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 952.26 Judicial Officer. ( a ) The Judicial Officer is authorized: ( 1 ) To act as presiding officer;
( 2 ) To render tentative decisions;
( 3 ) To render final agency decisions;
( 4 ) To issue Postal Service orders for the Postmaster General;
( 5 ) To refer the record in any proceeding to the Postmaster General or the Deputy Postmaster General for final agency decision;
( 6 ) To remand a case to the presiding officer for consideration; and,
( 7 ) To revise or amend these rules of practice.
( b ) In determining appeals from initial decisions or exceptions to tentative decisions, the entire official record will be considered before a final agency decision is rendered. Before rendering a final agency decision, the Judicial Officer may order the hearing reopened for the presentation of additional evidence by the parties.
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 1 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 2 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 3 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 4 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 5 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 6 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 7 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 8 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 9 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 10 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 11 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 12 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 13 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 14 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 15 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 16 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 17 of 18
Case 9:22-cv-81101-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/2022 Page 18 of 18
#### § 235.1 Postal Service to the Armed Forces.

( a ) Publication 38, Postal Agreement with the Department of Defense, defines the Postal Service's responsibilities for providing postal service to the Armed Forces.

( b ) The Chief Inspector is responsible for military liaison.

( c ) Postal inspectors provide liaison between postmasters and military commanders, visit military installations as required, and make any necessary recommendations.

(39 U.S.C. 401(2), 402, 403, 404, as enacted by Pub. L. 91-375, 84 Stat. 719)

[38 FR 26193, Sept. 9, 1973]
###### Editorial Note on Part 165

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

#### § 165.2010 Purpose.

This subpart establishes the geographic parameters of naval vessel protection zones surrounding U.S. naval vessels in the navigable waters of the United States. This subpart also establishes when the U.S. Navy will take enforcement action in accordance with the statutory guidelines of 14 U.S.C. 91. Nothing in the rules and regulations contained in this subpart shall relieve any vessel, including U.S. naval vessels, from the observance of the Navigation Rules. The rules and regulations contained in this subpart supplement, but do not replace or supercede, any other regulation pertaining to the safety or security of U.S. naval vessels.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of AMERCO (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 3, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Shoen, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







AMERCO,





a Nevada corporation





/s/ Edward J. Shoen





Edward J. Shoen


President and Chairman of the Board


Date:  November 3, 2010
#### § 3010.331 Proposed findings and conclusions.

The Commission or the presiding officer may direct the filing of proposed findings and conclusions with a brief statement of the supporting reasons for each proposed finding and conclusion.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4767 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4767

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Exisulind.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2000

Mr. Greenwood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Exisulind.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.29.01    5-fluro-2-methyl- Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     1-[[4-                                                                  31/2003          ''
                     methylsulfonylp                                                                           .
                     henyl]
                     methylene]-
                     indene-3-
                     ylacetic acid
                     (CAS No. 59973-
                     80-7) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     2930.90.29)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 8 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Reno J. Calabrigo, the President,
of Magnum d'Or Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-SBK/A for the year
ended September 30, 2003(the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 22nd day of January, 2004


                                        By:  /s/  Reno J. Calabrigo
                                        --------------------------------
                                              Reno J. Calabrigo
                                           President,



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Magnum d'Or Resources, Inc. and will be retained by
Magnum d'Or Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or it staff upon request.
§ 3041.405 Docket and notice. ( a ) The Commission will issue a notice establishing a docket for each request to add a negotiated service agreement to the competitive product list under this part. The Commission will also issue a notice upon receiving a request complying with the requirements of § 3041.505(b) to amend an existing negotiated service agreement. Notices issued pursuant to this paragraph (a) will include: ( 1 ) The general nature of the proceeding;
( 2 ) A reference to the legal authority pursuant to which the proceeding is to be conducted;
( 3 ) A concise description of the proposal;
( 4 ) If applicable, the identification of an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in the docket;
( 5 ) If applicable, a specified period for public comment; and
( 6 ) Such other information as the Commission deems appropriate.
( b ) The Commission will post the notice on its website. The Commission will promptly publish the notice in the Federal Register.
( c ) In the case of a request to add a standardized distinct product to the competitive product list or to amend a standardized distinct product, an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public will not be appointed in the docket.
( d ) In the case of a request to add a standardized distinct product to the competitive product list or to amend a standardized distinct product, public comment will not be requested in the docket.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 9:22-cv-81332-DMM 

RUDOLPH BETANCOURT, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

TPG BOCA RATON, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________/ 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

Pursuant to S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.4, Plaintiff, Rudolph Betancourt, and Defendant, TPG Boca 

Raton, LLC, hereby give notice that they have reached a resolution of this matter and are in the 

process of preparing and executing settlement documents. The Parties respectfully request 30 days 

to file their stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. 

Dated: October 27, 2022 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Brandon Rotbart

Brandon A. Rotbart, Esq. 

 Florida Bar No. 124771 

 rotbart@rotbartlaw.com 

Law Office of Brandon A. Rotbart, P.A. 

12000 Biscayne Blvd. 

Suite 502 

North Miami, FL 33181 

Phone: 305.350.7400 

Counsel for Plaintiff

/s/ Paul De Boe 

Paul J. De Boe, Esq. 

 Florida Bar No.: 52051 

 paul.deboe@ogletreedeakins.com 

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, 

SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 

Two Datran Center 

9130 S. Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1625 

Miami, Florida 33156 

Telephone: 305.374.0506 

Facsimile: 305.374.0456 

Counsel for Defendant

Case 9:22-cv-81332-DMM Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2022 Page 1 of 1
Order entered September 2 6 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00793
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF D .D., JR., A CHILD On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 17
- 10679



### O RDER
W e REINSTATE this appeal

. O n August 22, 2018 , we abated the appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to conduct a hearing to determine if appellant wished to be represented by counsel an d, if she did, to appoint counsel. The trial court was to make written findings and transmit to the Court, no later than September 14, 2018, a reporter’s record from the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and any order of ap pointment . To date, the requested record has

not been filed. H owever, by motion filed September 24, 2018, appellant informs the Court that the trial court sua sponte appointed Stephanie L. Pond to represent her and asks , in part, that the
deadline for fi ling appellant’s brief be set. We GRANT the motion as follows.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to designate Ms. Pond as counsel for appellant and
ORDER appellant to file her brief no later than October 8, 2018.
/s/ A DA BROWN JUSTICE
§ 3012.3 Definition of a matter before the Commission. ( a ) A matter is before the Commission at such time as the Commission may designate, but in no event later than the earlier of the filing of a request to initiate a proceeding or the Commission noticing a proceeding.
( b ) A matter is also before the Commission at such time as the person responsible for the communication has knowledge that a request to initiate a proceeding is expected to be filed.
( c ) Paragraph (b) of this section does not apply to periodic reviews or reports issued by the Commission, or the 10-year review pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3622(d)(3).
( d ) The following explanations apply: ( 1 ) A matter is no longer before the Commission upon the issuance of the final order or decision in the docketed matter;
( 2 ) A matter is again before the Commission upon the filing of a request for reconsideration. The matter remains before the Commission until resolution of the matter under reconsideration;
( 3 ) A matter is again before the Commission upon the remand of a Commission's final decision or order by an appellate court. The matter remains before the Commission until resolution of the matter under remand; and
( 4 ) The mere potential that a request may be filed does not place a matter before the Commission. An affirmative action announcing, or actively preparing, an actual request with the intent to file within a reasonable period of time must be present.
§ 334.5 Disestablishment of a danger zone. ( a ) Upon receipt of a request from any agency for the disestablishment of a danger zone, the District Engineer shall notify that agency of its responsibility for returning the area to a condition suitable for use by the public. The agency must either certify that it has not used the area for a purpose that requires cleanup or that it has removed all hazardous materials and munitions, before the Corps will disestablish the area. The agency will remain responsible for the enforcement of the danger zone regulations to prevent unauthorized entry into the area until the area is deemed safe for use by the public and the area is disestablished by the Corps.
( b ) Upon receipt of the certification required in paragraph (a) of this section, the District shall forward the request for disestablishment of the danger zone through channels to CECW-OR, with its recommendations. Notice of proposed rulemaking and public procedures as outlined in § 334.4 are not normally required before publication of the final rule revoking a restricted area or danger zone regulation. The disestablishment/revocation of the danger zone or restricted area regulation removes a restriction on a waterway.
[58 FR 37608, July 12, 1993]