alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4/27/11



### INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT (IRExR)

Chemical ID: P-11-0309 Reviewer: Cinalli/SS

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary

Exposure Scenario 1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air Drinking Water Fish Ingestion

ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q10 4

CC = PDM Days Exceede d LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD

Release activity(ies) 2 ;
exposure calculation(s) 3 mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day

USE: Max ADR
USE: Max LADD

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation. 2 Release activities are from engineering report's Manuf acturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release activity labels.Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at same location. 3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (A DR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). Th ere may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure scenario.CC is the aquatic concentration of concern. 4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q 10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily streamflow of the seven consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period.

Remarks:4/27/11

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-0309 Assessor: Cinalli/SS4/27/11

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-03094/27/11

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-0309 Assessor: Cinalli/SS4/27/11

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-11-03094/27/11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61408-CIV-SINGHAL

FRANCOISE H. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MARGARITA INANEZ DE SENDADIANO,

Defendant.

________________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE has come before the Court upon a sua sponte examination of the 

record. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of summons and complaint 

to be perfected upon Defendant within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff

filed this action on July 28, 2022, and to date, there is no indication in the court file that 

Defendant has been served with the summons and Complaint. It is therefore

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before November 1, 2022, Plaintiff shall 

perfect service upon the Defendant or show cause why this action should not be 

dismissed for failure to perfect service of process. Failure to file proof of service or show 

good cause by November 1, 2022, will result in a dismissal without prejudice and without 

further notice.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 28th day of 

October 2022.

Copy furnished counsel via CM/ECF

Case 0:22-cv-61408-AHS Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/28/2022 Page 1 of 1
AECOM Environment 1220 Avenida Acaso, Camarillo, CA 93012

T 805.388.3775 F 805.388.3577 www.aecom.com

AECOM Environment April 8, 2009

Mr. Ray Bransfield
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Ventura Field Office 2493 Portola Road, Suite B Ventura, CA 93003

RE: Palmdale Hybrid Power Project (PHPP) Application for PSD Permit and Request for Endangered Species Act Consultation and Concurrence

Dear Mr. Bransfield:

AECOM Environment, on behalf of the City of Palmdale and Inland Energy, Inc., submitted an application for a Prevention of Significant Dete rioration (PSD) permit for the Palmdale Hybrid Power Project (PHPP) last week to the U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency (EPA) Region 9. The PHPP is a hybrid power plant consisting of combined-cycle power plant integrated with 50 megawatts (MW) of solar arrays for a combined nominal output of 570 MW.

The City and Inland Energy antici pate that the EPA will initiate c onsultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), pursuant to Secti on 7 of the Endangered S pecies Act of 1973, as amended, regarding potential impac ts to listed species resulti ng from EPA’s issuance of a PSD permit for the PHPP. While EPA is expected to provide you with a copy when initiating their consultation on the PHPP, I am enclosing a copy of the Draft 1 Biological Assessment for your review. Based on this BA, we anticipate that EPA will seek concurrence fr om the USFWS that the Project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect federally listed species.

The City of Palmdale submitted its Application for Certification (AFC) to the California Energy Commission (CEC) on August 4, 2008, and was deemed Data Adequate on October 8, 2008. We request that USFWS work with the EPA and CEC to coordinate the timeline for permit approvals and requirements.

1 

### The document is a “Draft” since we consider it up to the agencies to finalize. However, from our standpoint, this is a Final document.Mr. Ray Bransfield April 8, 2009 Page 2

Please call me at (805) 388-3775 if you have any questions or need additional information. We appreciate your assistance with this matter.

Sincerely

Sara J. Head, QEP Vice President, AECOM Environment Sara.head@aecom.com

Attachments: Dra ft Biological Assessment

cc: Ms. Shirley Rivera, EPA
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30681 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HERBERT PEA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:03-CR-50013-SMH-7

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Herbert Pea appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base. He argues for the first time on appeal that his sentence violated United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). The district court’s enhancement of Pea’s sentence based upon drug amounts not charged in the indictment and hisNo. 04-30681 -2- possession of a firearm during the offense was plainly erroneous because those facts were not proven to a jury or admitted by Pea.
See Booker , 125 S. Ct. at 756, 764-65; United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 520-21 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). Pea has not shown, however, that the error affected his substantial rights. See Mares , 402 F.3d at 520-21. Pea argues that he does not have to show that the error affected his substantial rights because the error is structural or because the error should be presumed prejudicial. These arguments are foreclosed. See United States v. Malveaux , 411 F.3d 558, 560 n.9 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (July 11, 2005) (No. 05-5297).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
21




















Subsidiaries
of


Encompass
Group Affiliates, Inc.


at June 30,
2009








Encompass
Parts Distribution, Inc.


420
Lexington Avenue


New York,
NY  10170


EIN:  20-1088535


State of
Incorporation:  Delaware





Hudson
Street Investments, LLC


420
Lexington Avenue


New York,
NY  10170


EIN:  54-2137152


State of
Incorporation:  Delaware





Cyber-Test,
Inc.


448
Commerce Way


Longwood,
FL  32750


EIN:  20-1106218


State of
Incorporation:  Delaware





SpectruCell,
Inc.


420
Lexington Avenue


New York,
NY  10170


EIN:  56-2425121


State of
Incorporation:  Delaware





Vance
Baldwin, Inc.


7060
State Road 84, #12


Ft.
Lauderdale, FL 03317


EIN:  59-0718315


State of
Incorporation:  Florida





Tritronics,
Inc.


1306
Continental Drive


Abington,
MD 21009


EIN:
52-1036520


State of
Incorporation: Maryland





Encompass
Service Solutions, Inc.


420
Lexington Avenue


New York,
NY  10170


EIN:
26-4157403


State of
Incorporation: Delaware









Encompass
Parts Distribution, S. de R.L. de C.V.


c/oCervantes, Aguilar-Alvarez
y Sainz, S.C.


Torre del
Bosque


Blvd. M.
Avila Camacho 24 – 6° Piso


Lomas de
Chapul Tepec


Deleg.
Miguel Hidalgo


11000
Mexico, D.F.




Encompass
Distribution Canada, Inc.


c/o
Miller Thomson LLP


600, 60
Columbia Way


Markham,
ON, Canada L3R 0C9





* * *
*
§ 334.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Danger zone.* A defined water area (or areas) used for target practice, bombing, rocket firing or other especially hazardous operations, normally for the armed forces. The danger zones may be closed to the public on a full-time or intermittent basis, as stated in the regulations.
( b ) *Restricted area.* A defined water area for the purpose of prohibiting or limiting public access to the area. Restricted areas generally provide security for Government property and/or protection to the public from the risks of damage or injury arising from the Government's use of that area.
[58 FR 37607, July 12, 1993]
§ 385.25 Program Management Plans. ( a ) *General requirements.* ( 1 ) The Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall, in consultation with the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Commerce, the Seminole Tribe of Florida, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, develop a Program Management Plan prior to initiating a program-level activity.
( 2 ) The Program Management Plan shall define the activities, and where appropriate, the subordinate tasks, as well as the assignment of responsibility for completing products developed in support to program-level activities.
( 3 ) In accordance with § 385.18, Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall provide opportunities for the public to review and comment on the Program Management Plan.
( b ) *Revisions to Program Management Plans.* The Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor may, in consultation with the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Commerce, the Seminole Tribe of Florida, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, revise the Program Management Plan whenever necessary to incorporate new or changed information that affects the scope, schedule, or budget of the activities described in the Program Management Plan. In accordance with § 385.18, the Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall provide opportunities for the public to review and comment on revisions to the Program Management Plan.
#### § 80.1460 Kahului Harbor, Maui, HI.

A line drawn from 20°54′04.1′′ N., 156°28′26.8′′ W. (Kahului Entrance Breakwater Light 4), to 20°54′02.3′′ N., 156°28′17.4′′ W. (Kahului Entrance Breakwater Light 3).

[USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38431, July 7, 2014]
OCTAVIO COLLADO

For himself and all others

similarly situated,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PLAINTIFF(S)

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074

VS.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER,

RJ RIVER, LLC, AND

ROMAN JONES,

RE-NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF

MEDIATOR, AND SCHEDULED 

 DEFENDANT(S) CONFERENCE DATE

FLORIDA BAR NO. 354929

YOU ARE NOTIFIED that the undersigned is the Certified Mediator stipulated to in this 

action pursuant to F.S. 44.1011-201 and the applicable Fed.R.Civ.P.

The Mediation Conference has been set to be heard on the 26 day of July, 2023

commencing at 10:00 A.M. virtually through Zoom by clicking this link 

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87629189972 . The agreed rate of compensation shall be $225.00 per 

party / per hour. Counsel and their respective parties agree that the mediator will be 

compensated for all mediation services, including scheduling, travel, preparation and follow up 

work, time, attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in collection of fees, responding to subpoenas, 

discovery requests, filing court papers or attending any court proceeding. There is a four hour

minimum which is due seven (7) days prior to the conference. If there is a settlement, schedule 

change or cancellation made less than seven (7) business days before the scheduled mediation 

conference, then the minimum fee shall be charged to the party or apportioned equally among the 

parties responsible for the cancellation. Counsel for each party is responsible for financial 

arrangements with their clients and timely payment of said fees prior to any dismissal. Counsel 

and the parties agree to be jointly and severally responsible for their portion of the mediator’s fee 

at the conclusion of each conference. Interest on any unpaid balances shall be at ten percent per 

annum.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this notice has been mailed and emailed on 

the 19

th day of April, 2023 to: Brian H. Pollock, Esq. Brian@fairlawattorney.com , FAIRLAW 

FIRM, 135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, FL 33146; Allan S. Reiss, Esq. 

Asr@levinelawfirm.com, Levine & Partners, P.A., 3350 Mary Street, Miami, FL 33133; Reynaldo 

Velazquez, Esq. rey.velazquez@jacksonlewis.com, and Roman Sarangoulis, Esq. ,

roman.sarangoulis@jacksonlewis.com, JACKSON LEWIS P.C., One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3500

Two South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida 33131.

___________Laurie L Riemer_________________

Laurie L. Riemer, Esquire, Mediator/Arbitrator

20155 Northeast 38th Court, #3104

Aventura, Florida 33180

(305) 932-2200 

Email: Lriemer@riemermediation.com

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/2023 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6283

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District 

Judge. (3:05-cr-00231-JRS-1)

Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 26, 2013

Before DUNCAN and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.*

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kareem Jamal Currence, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. Hood, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

 

*

 The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006). 
2

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence, a federal prisoner, seeks to 

appeal the district court’s order construing his petition for a 

writ of audita querela as a successive and unauthorized 28 

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. Currence has also 

filed a motion for a transcript at Government expense. The 

district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Currence has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Currence’s motion 
3

for a transcript at Government expense, and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

AUG U 8 2022 

ANGELA E. NOBLE 

CLEnK U S. DIST. CT. 

S.O. OF FLA - WP.B. 

V. 

NOTICE OF TEMPORARY 

APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL 

. \ tetr~~t{(. ~ 

COMESNOW ___ -+-++--7"'-=->---'-_,__,, _ __ (_0_----'-_ ____ and 

files this temporary appearance as counsel for the above named defendant(s) at initial appearance. 

This appearance is made with the understanding that the undersigned counsel will fulfill any 

obligations imposed by the Court such as preparing and filing documents necessary to 

collateralize ~y personal sur which ma)i b~ , ✓. 

Counsel's Name (Printed):__,_\ -""r-7'-.....:L;>4-:!ab'I--- +---"'-........... )_ \ _ ((/ .:.,__ _______ _ 

Counsel's Signature: 

Address (include City/State/Zip Code): J 

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/09/2022 Page 1 of 1
#### HIRAM V. BAYLIS, Appellant, *v.*HENRY G. SCUDDER and others, Respondents.

*Injunction*— *damages on bond gimen on obtaining.*

Tiie plaintiff brought this action against the defendants, individually, to restrain them from laying out a highway in the town of Huntington, as coinmissioners appointed under chapter 344 of 1870, and procured a temporary injunction therein, which was subsequently dissolved. The defendant claimed, as damages sustained by reason of the injunction, the amount paid to the counsel appearing for them, on the motion to dissolve the injunction. The plaintiff claimed that they were sued, as individuals, and that as such they had sustained no damages, the counsel fees being paid from the proceeds of bonds sold by them as commissioners. Held, that as the defendants had no authority to apply the proceeds of the bonds to the payment of counsel fees, such payment must be considered as a private one, and that they were entitled to recover therefor.

Appeal from an order confirming the report of a referee, appointed to compute the amount of damages sustained by the defendants, upon a temporary injunction, granted in this, action.

*J. Lamrenee Smith,*for appellant. *Henry G. Platt,*for respondents.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Tappen and Talcott, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 427I |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 6219 grudnia 2019 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 427I

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 6219 grudnia 2019

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Ogłoszenia |
| | POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE |
| | Komisja Europejska |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Zaproszenie do zgłaszania kandydatur do Nagrody im. Jana Amosa Komeniusza za wysokiej jakości nauczanie o Unii Europejskiej | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

V   Ogłoszenia

POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE

Komisja Europejska

2019/C 427 I/01

Zaproszenie do zgłaszania kandydatur do Nagrody im. Jana Amosa Komeniusza za wysokiej jakości nauczanie o Unii Europejskiej

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

V Ogłoszenia

POSTĘPOWANIA ADMINISTRACYJNE

Komisja Europejska

| 19.12.2019 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CI 427/1

---

Zaproszenie do zgłaszania kandydatur

do Nagrody im. Jana Amosa Komeniusza za wysokiej jakości nauczanie o Unii Europejskiej

(2019/C 427 I/01)

Dyrekcja Generalna ds. Edukacji, Młodzieży, Sportu i Kultury Komisji Europejskiej opublikowała zaproszenie do zgłaszania kandydatur do Nagrody im. Jana Amosa Komeniusza za wysokiej jakości nauczanie o Unii Europejskiej.

Nagroda zostanie przyznana szkołom, które w inspirujący sposób przekazują uczniom wiedzę o Unii Europejskiej. Nagroda zapewni ogólnoeuropejskie uznanie i widoczność działań dydaktycznych w każdym państwie członkowskim oraz podkreśli znaczenie nauczania i uczenia się na temat UE w młodym wieku. Będzie okazją do zaprezentowania innowacyjnych metod nauczania, które aktywnie angażują uczniów w naukę o UE, i pomoże rozpowszechniać te metody.

Zaproszenie do zgłaszania kandydatur jest otwarte dla szkół (poziom ISCED 2 i ISCED 3) zarejestrowanych i mających siedzibę w Unii Europejskiej (nie dla poszczególnych nauczycieli).

W ramach konkursu przyznane zostanie do dwudziestu ośmiu (28) nagród o wysokości 8 000 EUR każda, po jednej na państwo członkowskie.

Jeżeli Zjednoczone Królestwo wystąpi z UE zanim zapadnie decyzja o przyznaniu nagród przez Komisję Europejską (po dokonaniu oceny wniosków), nie zawierając umowy zapewniającej w szczególności, że kandydaci ze Zjednoczonego Królestwa będą nadal kwalifikować się do udziału w konkursie, zgłoszenia brytyjskich szkół zostaną uznane za niekwalifikujące się. W takim przypadku maksymalna liczba nagród będzie wynosić 27 (zamiast 28), lecz kwota pojedynczej nagrody pozostanie niezmienna (8 000 EUR).

Termin zgłaszania kandydatur upływa w czwartek 6 lutego 2020 r. o godz. 17.00 czasu środkowoeuropejskiego.

Wszystkie istotne informacje i formularze zgłoszeniowe dostępne są na stronie internetowej:

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_pl

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000002852
<NAME> AGWAY INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     35904
<RECEIVABLES>                                   164891
<ALLOWANCES>                                     10459
<INVENTORY>                                     186737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                541608
<PP&E>                                          532387
<DEPRECIATION>                                  292644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1191106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           389404
<BONDS>                                         591527
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      62215
<COMMON>                                          2705
<OTHER-SE>                                       87769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1191106
<SALES>                                         654085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                689989
<CGS>                                           611986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   635213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 66694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3103)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15389)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    2017
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13372)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>