Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 112 / Friday, June 9, 2000 / Notices 36691

of Flooding, Glenn, Colusa and Yolo

Counties, CA, Due: August 25, 2000,

Contact: Russ Smith (530) 275–1554.

EIS No. 000176, Draft SUPPLEMENT,

UAF, TX, Programmatic EIS—Kelly

Air Force Base (AFB), Disposal and

Reuse, Implementation, San Antonio

County, TX, Due: July 24, 2000,

Contact: Jonathan D. Farthing (210)

536–3787.

EIS No. 000177, Draft EIS, GSA, DC,

Department of Transportation

Headquarters, Proposal to Lease 1.3 to

1.35 Million Rentable Square Feet of

Consolidated and Upgraded Space,

Five Possible Sites, Located in the

Central Employment Area,

Washington, DC, Due: July 24, 2000,

Contact: John Simeon (202) 260–9586.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 000101, Draft EIS, FAA, NC,

Piedmont Triad International Airport,

Construction and Operation, Runway

5L/23R and New Overnight Express

Air Cargo Sorting and Distribution

Facility, and Associated

Developments, Funding, NPDES and

COE Section 404 Permit, City of

Greensboro, Guilford County, NC,

Due: June 22, 2000, Contact: Donna

M. Meyer (404) 305–7150. Revision of

FR notice published on 05/19/2000:

CEQ Comment Date has been

Extended from 06/07/2000 to 06/22/

2000.

Dated: June 6, 2000.

Ken Mittelholtz,

Environmental Protection Specialist, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 00–14668 Filed 6–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[ER–FRL–6608–1]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared May 22, 2000 Through May

26, 2000 pursuant to the Environmental

Review Process (ERP), under Section

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental

Policy Act as amended. Requests for

copies of EPA comments can be directed

to the Office of Federal Activities at

(202) 564–7167.

An explanation of the ratings assigned

to draft environmental impact

statements (EISs) was published in FR

dated April 14, 2000 (65 FR 20157).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–AFS–L65348–ID Rating

EC2, Idaho Panhandle National Forests,

Small Sales, Harvesting Dead and

Damaged Timber, Coeur d’Alene River

Range District, Kootenai and Shoshone

Counties, ID.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns about potential

adverse impacts to old growth units and

the level and nature of risk to

landowners from wildfire from the

proposed actions.

ERP No. D–AFS–L65349–ID Rating

EC2, Warm Springs Ridge Vegetation

Management Project, Improve Forest

Condition, Boise National Forest,

Cascade Resource Area, Boise County,

ID.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns about potential

adverse impacts to already impaired

streams within the watershed. EPA

recommends that the final EIS supply

additional information on watershed

condition and proposed restoration

strategies.

ERP No. D–TVA–E39052–MS Rating

EO2, Union County Multipurpose

Reservoir/Other Water Supply

Alternatives Project, To Provide an

Adequate and Reliable Water Supply,

COE Section 404 Permit and NPDES

Permit, City of New Alban, Union

County, MS.

Summary: EPA raised objections to

foreseeable reservoir water quality

impacts and engineering design

uncertainties. Omission of water

conservation and reuse as an alternative

should be re-evaluated for the FEIS.

EPA could favor the pipeline

alternative, depending on additional

requested information regarding the

impacts on the Tennessee-Tombigbee

Waterway source water and potential

interbasin water transfer issues.

ERP No. DS–COE–K32046–CA Rating

EC2, Port of Los Angeles Channel

Deepening Project, To Improve

Navigation and Disposal of Dredge

Material for the Inner Harbor Channels,

Los Angeles County, CA.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

potential impacts to air quality and

aquatic resources, indirect and

cumulative impacts, environmental

justice considerations, and mitigation

measures proposed in the supplemental

EIS. EPA is concerned that the EIS fails

to address hazardous air pollutants (air

toxics) currently emitted at the Port and

reasonably foreseeable air toxic

emissions that could occur under the

project.

Final EISs

ERP No. F–AFS–L65302–AK, Kuakan

Timber Sale, Timber Harvesting in the

Kuakan Project Area, Implementation,

Deer Island within the Wrangell Ranger

District, Stikine Area of the Tongass

National Forest, AK.

Summary: No formal comment letter

was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. FB–NOA–E86002–00 Fishery

Management Plan (FMP), Regulatory

Impact Review, Snapper-Grouper

Complex, South Atlantic Region.

Summary: EPA has no objections to

the proposed plan. EPA strongly

supports the proposed stock

reassessment every two years and

adaptive management approach of the

FMP. While agreeing with the overall

FMP, EPA prefers the alternative to

enact a moratorium on red porgy

fishing.

Dated: June 6, 2000.

Ken Mittelholtz,

Environmental Protection Specialist, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 00–14669 Filed 6–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–6712–3]

Science Advisory Board; Notification

of Public Advisory Committee Meeting

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory

Committee Act, Public Law 92–463,

notice is hereby given that the Clean Air

Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)

will meet on Monday, June 26, 2000

from 11 am to 12 pm Eastern Daylight

Time to review a report developed by its

Technical Subcommittee on Fine

Particle Monitoring. The meeting will be

coordinated through a conference call

connection in Room 6013 in the USEPA,

Ariel Rios Building North, 1200

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20460. The public is

encouraged to attend the meeting in the

conference room noted above. However,

the public may also attend through a

telephonic link, to the extent that lines

are available (phone lines will be very

limited). Additional instructions about

how to participate in the meeting can be

obtained by calling Ms. Diana Pozun

prior to the meeting at (202) 564–4544,

or via e-mail at <pozun.diana@epa.gov>.

Background

The CASAC Technical Subcommittee

on Fine Particle Monitoring (the

Subcommittee) was established in 1996

to provide advice and comment to EPA

(through CASAC) on appropriate

36692 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 112 / Friday, June 9, 2000 / Notices

methods and network strategies for

monitoring fine particles in the context

of implementing the revised national

ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)

for particulate matter. The

Subcommittee provided such advice on

the Federal Reference Method (FRM)

and mass-based fine particle network in

July 1996, and has recently examined (at

a public meeting on April 18–19, 2000)

EPA’s plans and guidance for several

components of the fine particle

monitoring network and how these

components are linked to research

priorities for particulate matter (see 65

Federal Register 16916, March 30, 2000

for more details). As a result of that

meeting, the Subcommittee prepared a

draft report advising the Agency on the

PM2.5 Monitoring Network.

Purpose of the Meeting

At this meeting, the Clean Air

Scientific Advisory Committee,

chartered under 42 U.S.C. 7409, will

review a report (Clean Air Scientific

Advisory Committee Advisory on the

PM2.5 Monitoring Network) developed

by its Technical Subcommittee on Fine

Particle Monitoring.

Availability of Review Materials

Single copies of the review document

(Clean Air Scientific Advisory

Committee Advisory on the PM2.5

Monitoring Network, draft dated May

31, 2000) are available from Ms. Diana

Pozun, Clean Air Scientific Advisory

Committee, Science Advisory Board

(1400A), U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460.

Ms. Pozun can also be reached by

telephone at (202) 564–4544, fax at (202)

501–0582, or e-mail:

<pozun.diana@epa.gov>. The draft

report is also available on the SAB

Website (www.epa.gov/sab) under the

Reports heading, and Draft Reports

subheading.

For Further Information

Members of the public desiring

additional information about the

meeting should contact Mr. Robert

Flaak, Designated Federal Officer, Clean

Air Scientific Advisory Committee,

Science Advisory Board (1400A), Suite

6450, U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460;

telephone/voice mail at (202) 564–4546;

fax at (202) 501–0582; or via e-mail at

<flaak.robert@epa.gov>. A copy of the

draft agenda is available from Ms. Diana

Pozun at (202) 564–4544 or by FAX at

(202) 501–0582 or via e-mail at

<pozun.diana@epa.gov>.

Members of the public who wish to

make a brief oral presentation to the

Subcommittee (in Room 6013 only)

must contact Mr. Flaak in writing (by

letter or by fax—see previously stated

information) no later than 12 noon

Eastern Daylight Savings Time, Monday,

June 19, 2000 in order to be included on

the Agenda. Public comments will be

limited to five minutes per speaker or

organization; 15 minutes total. The

request should identify the name of the

individual making the presentation, and

the organization (if any) they will

represent. Please note: If we receive

more requests than we can

accommodate, time of receipt in the

CASAC office will determine priority,

with the first three requests granted

time. All others will have to provide

written comments. Written comments of

any length may be submitted to Mr.

Flaak at any time until the date of the

meeting. Please provide at least 25

copies. The Science Advisory Board

expects that public statements presented

at its meetings will not be repetitive of

previously submitted oral or written

statements.

Individuals requiring special

accommodation at this meeting,

including wheelchair access to the

conference room, should contact Mr.

Flaak at least five business days prior to

the meeting so that appropriate

arrangements can be made.

Dated: June 1, 2000.

John R. Fowle III,

Deputy Staff Director, Science Advisory

Board.

[FR Doc. 00–14636 Filed 6–8–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

May 31, 2000.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

Whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before July 10, 2000. If

you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Judy

Boley, Federal Communications

Commission, Room 1–C804, 445 12th

Street, SW, DC 20554 or via the Internet

to jboley@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collection(s), contact Judy

Boley at 202–418–0214 or via the

Internet at jboley@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Control No.: 3060–0056.

Title: Registration of Telephone and

Data Terminal Equipment.

Form No.: FCC Form 730.

Type of Review: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit.

Number of Respondents: 2,400.

Estimated Time Per Response: 24

hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion

reporting requirement .

Total Annual Burden: 57,600 hours.

Total Annual Cost: $2,700,000.

Needs and Uses: Telephone and data

equipment located on customer

premises must be registered with the

Commission. Part 68 of the FCC’s rules

and regulations establish nationwide

technical standards for telephone and

data equipment designed for connection

to the network. Part 68 also sets forth

the terms and conditions for connection

and for the registration of customer

provided terminal equipment. The

purpose of Part 68 is to protect the

network from certain types of harm and

interference to other subscribers.

The FCC Form 730 is used to obtain

registration of telephone equipment

pursuant to Part 68. In addition to filing

the form, applicants are required to

submit exhibits and other informational

showings as specified in Part 68.

This notice is necessary to obtain

public comment so that the Commission