alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Carson *vs*Osborn.

Appeal erom the Caldwell Circuit.

*Bankrupts. Pleading. Issues immaterial.*

*January*2.

The promise of a discharged bankrupt . to pay a note given before bankruptcy does not revive the right of action, upon the note : (8 *B. Monroe*7 ; 9 *lb. ii.)*

The filing a replication after demurrer to plea overruled is a *156ivaiver of the error of the Court in overruling the demurrer : (3 *Marshall,*613.)

*155Judge Simpson

delivered *the opinion*of *the*Court.

The pi’omise of a discharged bankrupt to pay a previous debt, although valid, does not revive his liability upon the note evidencing the debt, or enable the creditor to bring a suit upon it, but he is liable alone upon the new promise, and the suit must be brought upon it: *Egbert*vs *McMichael, (9 B. Monroe*44,) *and Graham*vs *Hunt,*(8 *B. Monroe,*7.)

As the suit, in this case, was brought upon the note, and the defendant filed a plea, relying upon his discharge in bankruptcy, the replication setting up a sub*156sequent promise by him to pay the debt, in the note mentioned, was an insufficient answer to the plea, and the demurrer to it should have been sustained. But as the defendant filed a rejoinder to the replication, it must be regarded as a waiver or virtual withdrawal of the demurrer, and leaves him in the same condition he would have been had the demurrer never been filed; *Patrick*vs *Conrad,*(3 *Marsh.*613.)

The Court cannot properly render judgment upon the finding of an issue for the plaintiff, which is immaterial: (1 *Bibb*257.)

*Craddock, Cates, and B. Sf A. Monroe*for appellant; *J. Sf W. L. Harlan*for appellee.

One of the assignments of error, however, brings in question the propriety of rendering a judgment against the defendant upon the verdict finding the issue in favor of the plaintiff. The issue made between the parties was, whether the defendant had, after he became a bankrupt and was thereby discharged from all liability on the note upon which the suit had been brought, promised to pay the debt, as alleged by the plaintiff in his replication. By the verdict of the jury, it was determined that such a promise had been made by him. But as that promise did not revive his original liability upon the note, the fact established by the verdict, did not authorize the Court to render a judgment upon it against the defendant. The issue tried was wholly immaterial, and the verdict of the jury, giving to it all the effect to which it. is entitled, cannot sustain the judgment for the plaintiff: *Crozier*vs *Gano and wife,*(1 *Bibb,*257.)

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded, with directions to set aside the verdict, and allow the plaintiff to amend his replication, or to file a new one, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN

(Hector Morales)

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Hector Morales.

Dated this 24th day of July 2023.

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 169 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 324.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this regulation, the following terms are defined: ( a ) The term *ocean waters* means those waters of the open seas lying seaward of the base line from which the territorial sea is measured, as provided for in the Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone (15 UST 1606: TIAS 5639).
( b ) The term *dredged material* means any material excavated or dredged from navigable waters of the United States.
( c ) The term *transport* or *transportation* refers to the conveyance and related handling of dredged material by a vessel or other vehicle.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Southern District of Florida

VOCODIA HOLDINGS CORP, a Wyoming 

corporation

9:22cv81472

OMER KHAN, an individual, and VIVID TECH, INC., 

a Delaware corporation

Vivid Tech, Inc. 

340 South Lelon Avenue 

Walnut, CA 91789

Kristin Drecktrah Paz, Esq. 

Perlman, Bajandas, Yevoli & Albright, P.A. 

283 Catalonia Ave., Suite 600, Coral Gables, FL 33134 

kpaz@pbyalaw.com 

Sep 23, 2022 s/ Esperanza Buchhorst

Case 9:22-cv-81472-DMM Document 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit








Delek US Holdings, Inc. 7102 Commerce Way
Brentwood, TN 37027 615-771-6701
September 30, 2019
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. 100 Crescent Court
Suite 1600
Dallas, Texas 75201


RE: Pipelines and Terminals Agreement by and among Alon USA, LP ("Alon") and Holly Energy Partners, L.P. ("HEP') dated February 28, 2005, as has been amended (collectively the "Agreement")
To Whom It May Concern:
Under Section 13(b) of the Agreement, Alon has the option renew the Agreement for three (3) additional five (5) year terms and such renewal options may apply to only such Refined Product Pipelines or Refined Product Terminals as Alon shall designate. Any terms not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


This letter is to provide HEP notice of Alon's exercising of its option to renew the Agreement for an additional five (5) year period, but only for the Refined Product Pipelines and Refined Product Terminals as provided for below:
Refined Product Pipelines
		
	1.
	Big Spring, TX to Abilene, TX (6")


		
	2.
	Midland, TX to Orla, TX


		
	3.
	Abilene, TX to Dyess AFB


Refined Product Terminals
		
	1.
	Abilene, TX


		
	2.
	Orla, TX


Nothing herein is a waiver of any rights Alon may have under the Agreement. Please do not hesitate to contact Wesley Carter at (615) 207-0278 or wesley.carter@delekus.com if you have any questions.

Avigal Soreq
EVP Commercial
#### § 151.2036 Extension of compliance date.

The Coast Guard may grant an extension to the implementation schedule listed in § 151.2035(b) of this subpart only in those cases where the master, owner, operator, agent, or person in charge of a vessel subject to this subpart can document that, despite all efforts, compliance with the requirement under § 151.2025 is not possible. Any extension request must be made no later than 12 months before the scheduled implementation date listed in § 151.2035(b) of this subpart and submitted in writing by email to *environmental_standards@uscg.mil,* or to the Commandant (CG-OES), Attn: Office of Operating and Environmental Standards, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. Summary information concerning all extension decisions, including the name of the vessel and vessel owner, the term of the extension, and the basis for the extension will be promptly posted on the Internet. Extensions will be for no longer than the minimum time needed, as determined by the Coast Guard, for the vessel to comply with the requirements of § 151.2030.

[USCG-2001-10486, 77 FR 17306, Mar. 23, 2012, as amended by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38435, July 7, 2014; USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44282, July 27, 2015; USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30880, June 28, 2019]
Exhibit 4.47


 


Summary
of the Series B Subscription Agreement, entered into on September 16, 2019


 


Parties:
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, as an investor in the series B funding round; Agrofy
Global, Agrofy S.A.U. (the “Argentine Subsidiary”), Agrofy Brasil Atividades de Internet Ltda. (the “Brazilian
Subsidiary”), Agrofy LLC (the “US Subsidiary” and, together with the Argentine Subsidiary and the Brazilian Subsidiary,
the “Subsidiaries”); Helmir S.A.U., Jiwely Investment S.A., Bogdana S.A., and Junayd Company S.A., collectively, as
founders; and certain other investors named in the agreement.


 


Purpose:
Investment in Agrofy Global. Agrofy Global and its Subsidiaries develop an e-commerce marketplace for the agribusiness sector with
an initial focus on Argentina and Brazil. Agrofy Global currently owns all of the shares of the Argentine Subsidiary and the US
Subsidiary and 99.99% of the shares of the Brazilian Subsidiary, while the remaining 0.1% is owned by the Argentine Subsidiary.


 


Pursuant to the
Series B Subscription Agreement, the aggregate amount of the Series B investment in Agrofy Global shall not to exceed US$18,000,000.
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas subscribed 76,376 Series B shares of Agrofy Global for
consideration in the aggregate amount of US$1,000,000.


 


The Series B
Subscription Agreement provides for an initial closing date on September 16, 2019 and an additional closing date on or prior to
December 17, 2019. On September 23, 2019, we made a payment in the amount of 50% of the investment to Agrofy Global, and the remaining
balance will be paid by December 2019. Following the Series B Subscription Agreement, BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira
de Propriedades Agrícolas held approximately 1.8% of the share capital of Agrofy Global.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case No. 1:22-cv-23223

VENUS CONCEPT USA INC., a

Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

Exotic V’s Beauty Bar and Spa, a California 

company, and Victoria Naborne, 

an individual,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

DECLARATION AS TO MILITARY SERVICE

I, Vincent F. Alexander, Esq., represent Plaintiff, Venus Concept USA, Inc. (“Venus”). To 

support Plaintiff’s application for a default final judgment and to comply with the Servicemembers 

Civil Relief Act (SCRA) (formerly known as Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940), 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare as follows to the best of my knowledge, information, and 

belief:

______ I know of my own personal knowledge that Victoria Naborne IS on active duty in the 

military service of the United States.

_____ I know of my own personal knowledge that Victoria Naborne IS NOT now on active duty 

in the military service of the United States, nor has Victoria Naborne been on active military 

service of the United States within a period of thirty (30) days immediately before this date. 

“Active Service” includes reserve members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, and 

Case 1:22-cv-23223-DPG Document 14-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

Marines who have been ordered to report for active duty and members of the Florida National 

Guard who have been ordered to report to active duty for a period of more than thirty (30) days. 

______ I have contacted the military services of the United States and the U.S. Public Health 

Service and have obtained certificates showing that Victoria Naborne is not on active duty status. 

These certificates are attached.

___X__ I have attempted to determine the military status of Victoria Naborne, but do not have 

sufficient information. This is what I have done to determine whether or not Victoria Naborne is 

on active duty in the United States military: 

Searched the Department of Defense Manpower Data Center, search report attached. I have 

no reason to believe that she is on active duty at this time.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on June 2, 2023

/s/ Vincent F. Alexander

Vincent F. Alexander

Fla. Bar No. 68114

Counsel for Plaintiff

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

110 SE 6th St., Ste. 2600

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

Tel: (954) 728-1280

Fax: (954) 678-4090

vincent.alexander@lewisbrisbois.com

Case 1:22-cv-23223-DPG Document 14-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of NELNET Student Loan Corporation-2 (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry
J. Heimes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company


/s/ Terry J. Heimes
------------------------------
Terry J. Heimes
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003
450044568410/07COMMONWEALTHOFPENNSYLVANIASTD—52IREV.12-88PUBLICATIONSAUTHORIZATIONANDINVOICEINVOIcENO.152196PUBLICATIONSAUTHORIZATION(Tobecompletedbyagency)I,—*Vrflpndsi.scribedbeforemethis/dayofAlVI!fti—/JiJ1iTONAMEANDAP.PRESSOFNEWSPAPER),FEDERALID.NO.150C,SEC.NO.briel1meNews25—0839114Attn:ClassifiedLegalDept.205W.12thStreetErj.e,PA16534FROM(NAMEANDADDRESSOFAGENCY)AGENCYTELEPHONENO.Yvette14.House717—787—9495BureauofAIrQua±lty12thFloor.Harrisburg,PA17105HEREWITH1SENCLOSEDCOPYFORPUBLICA110NOFADVERTISEMENTFORPROPOSALSTOTYPEOFAD.—EEMPLOYPURCHASECONTRACTSELL[]CLASSIFIEDLEGALNOTICEPUBUSHADVERTISEMENT(NOOFTIMES)MAXIMUMNOOFLINESDATEORDERNO1December6,2009DATESOFINSERT1ONSIGNAREFORAGEN5Y-,,“--2009December10,2009You,asvendor,areauthorizedtopublishthisadvertisementinyournewspaper,subjecttothetermsofthisorder,asfollows:Advertisementtobepublishedinregularadvertisingcolumns,nopositionspecified;captionoftwolinesandsignaturetobeincapitalsandsubjectmatterandtitleofofficertobesetsolidintyperegularlyusedby_yournewspaperforpublic(legal)noticeadvertising;chargetobemadeattheratechargedtoandpaidbycommercialadvertisersformattersimilarlysetandoccupyingsimilarspace;advertisementtoberunintheeditionsspecifiedabove.Vendoragreesthat,intheperformanceofanycontractawardedtoithereunder,saidvendorwillnotdiscriminateagainstanyemployeorotherpersonsonaccountofrace,color,sex,religiouscreed,.ancestry,ageorn,atiQnalorgjnandthattheCommonwealth,,uponreceiptofsatisfactoryevidenceofsuchdiscriminationshallhavethefighttocancels6icLcottraqtReturnthiscopyatonoeiyouwillnotacc.eptthisadvertisementunderthetermssetforth.ProofofadvertisingintheformofatearsheetmustbeincludedonParts1,2&3.Returnoriginalandtwocopies(signedbytheeditororpublisher)toAgencylistedabove.Part1mustbenotarized.Part4isyours.Commonwealthtobebilledonlyforactualnumberofprintedlinespublished.ACCOUNTFUND-DEjAPP,YEARLDG,ORGCOSTFUNIIONO..AMOUNTCODE4’-’.:‘‘{//(‘(()3J,,:1’..‘L,,17’rc7.:-1_cjOINVOICE(Tobecompletedbypublisher).jDATEOFINSERTIONACTUALNOOFPRINTEDLINESCOSTPERLINETOTALAMOUNTistAd.2ndAd3rdAd..•GRANDTOTAL—INPASTETERSHEETHERE..L.,.CommCountyof7ZithofPennsylvania,/)//f,’/7:/,T7-Beforeme,thesubscriber,aNotaryPublicinand&’rsonallycame_____________________________________f_______________________________________ageneralnewspaperpublishedat/./é//thattheadvertisement,ofwhichteaisheetisattachedhereto,waspublishedintheregularadvlitisingcolumnsofsaidnewspapervintheeditionsofsaidnewspaper,inallrespectsasorderedandinvoicedabove;andthattheCommonwealthisnotchargedthereforataratehigherthanischargedanyordinarycommercialadvertiserforasimilaramountofmatteroccupyingsimilarspaceandsetinasimilarmanner,insaidnewspaper.207/-NOTARYPUBLIC“INOTARIALSEALMycomissionexpires*ThisaffidavitmustbemadebytheOwner,Publisher,orthedesigrt’JSIGNATUREOFAFFIANTIVENDOR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information excerpted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended 09/30/96.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          38,331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,973
<INVENTORY>                                     44,426
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,365
<PP&E>                                         108,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,825
<BONDS>                                        150,999
<COMMON>                                         3,183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           52,656
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,857
<SALES>                                         63,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,912
<CGS>                                           36,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (920)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       635
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,261)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,261)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 2.5 Specific definitions control. In cases where a particular statute, regulation, policy or procedure provides a specific jurisdictional definition that differs from the definitions contained in this part, the former definition controls. Note to § 2.5 :
For example, the definition of “inland waters” in the Inland Navigational Rules Act of 1980 (33 U.S.C. 2003(o)) would control the interpretation of inland navigation rules created under that Act and the “inland waters” definition in 46 CFR 10.107 would control regulations in 46 CFR part 10. Also, in various laws administered and enforced by the Coast Guard, the terms “State” and “United States” are defined to include some or all of the territories and possessions of the United States. The definitions in §§ 2.36 and 2.38 should be considered as supplementary to these statutory definitions and not as interpretive of them.
[USCG-2001-9044, 68 FR 42598, July 18, 2003, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58275, Sept. 18, 2020]
§ 401.102 Civil penalty. ( a ) A person, as described in § 401.101(b) who violates a regulation in this chapter is liable to a civil penalty of not more than $114,630.
( b ) In assessing or collecting any civil penalty incurred under paragraph (a) of this section, the Corporation may, in its discretion, remit, mitigate or compromise any penalty.
( c ) Upon failure to collect a penalty levied under this section, the Corporation may request the United States Attorney General to commence any action for collection in any district court of the United States. A vessel by means of which a violation of a regulation is committed shall be liable in rem and may be proceeded against accordingly.
[39 FR 12746, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 47 FR 20582, May 23, 1982; 61 FR 54734, Oct. 22, 1996; 67 FR 67113, Nov. 4, 2002; 71 FR 66113, Nov. 13, 2006; 81 FR 41818, June 28, 2016; 82 FR 4173, Jan. 13, 2017; 83 FR 60743, Nov. 27, 2018; 84 FR 37070, July 31, 2019; 86 FR 1755, Jan. 11, 2021; 86 FR 23251, May 3, 2021; 87 FR 15865, Mar. 21, 2022; 88 FR 1124, Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 89559, Dec. 28, 2023]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-244-001]


Sumas International Pipeline Inc; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 1, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 26, 2000, Sumas International Pipeline Inc. 
(SIPI), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 2, the following tariff sheets to become effective May 1, 
2000:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet Number 10
Substitute Second Revised Sheet Number 11
Substitute Original Sheet Number 11A
Substitute First Revised Sheet Number 13A
Substitute First Revised Sheet Number 13B
Substitute First Revised Sheet Number 13C
Substitute Original Sheet Number 13D

    SIPI asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
Order No. 587 issued on July 17, 1996; the Notice Clarifying procedures 
for Filing Tariff Sheets issued on September 12, 1996, in Docket No. 
RM96-1-000; and the Commission's direction of 10 May, 2000 in Docket 
No. RP00-244-000 to correct errors in definitions on certain tariff 
sheets and to revise tariff language to incorporate Gas Industry 
Standards Board (GISB) Standards 1.3.38 and 1.3.46.
    SIPI states that copies of this filing were mailed to all customers 
of SIPI and Interested Parties.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. 
This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14235 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M