Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 111 / Thursday, June 8, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 36317

ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN

Section

Annual

number of

affected entities

Annual frequency

Average

burden per

disclosure

Annual burden hours

For the National School Lunch Program, school food authorities modify existing menus, etc. to identify beef, pork, poultry or seafood products or

dishes with more than 30 percent vegetable protein products in a manner that does not characterize these products or dishes as solely containing beef, pork, poultry or seafood:

Total existing ........................................................................... 7 CFR 210.10(h) 0 0 0 0

Total proposed ........................................................................ 7 CFR 210.10(h) 10,000 1 .016 160

For the School Breakfast Program, school food authorities modify existing menus, etc. to identify beef, pork, poultry or seafood products or

dishes with more than 30 percent vegetable protein products in a manner that does not characterize these products or dishes as solely containing beef, pork, poultry or seafood:

Total existing ........................................................................... 7 CFR 220.8(m) 0 0 0 0

Total proposed ........................................................................ 7 CFR 220.8(m) 5,000 1 .016 80

Total Third-party Disclosure Burden:

Total existing ........................................................................... 0

Total proposed ........................................................................ +240

Change ................................................................................... +240

List of Subjects

7 CFR Part 210

Children, Commodity School

Program, Food assistance programs,

Grants programs-social programs,

National School Lunch Program,

Nutrition, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Surplus agricultural

commodities.

7 CFR Part 220

Children, Food assistance programs,

Grant programs-social programs,

Nutrition, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, School Breakfast Program.

Accordingly, 7 CFR Parts 210 and 220

are amended as follows:

PART 210—NATIONAL SCHOOL

LUNCH PROGRAM

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR

Part 210 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1751–1760, 1779.

2. In § 210.10, revise the section

heading and paragraph (h) to read as

follows:

§ 210.10 What are the nutrition standards

and menu planning approaches for lunches

and the requirements for afterschool

snacks?

* * * * *

(h) What must schools do about

nutrition disclosure? To the extent that

school food authorities identify foods in

a menu, or on the serving line or

through other available means of

communicating with program

participants, school food authorities

must identify products or dishes

containing more than 30 parts fully

hydrated alternate protein products (as

specified in appendix A of this part) to

less than 70 parts beef, pork, poultry or

seafood on an uncooked basis, in a

manner which does not characterize the

product or dish solely as beef, pork,

poultry or seafood. Additionally, FNS

encourages schools to inform the

students, parents, and the public about

efforts they are making to meet the

nutrition standards (see paragraph (b) of

this section) for school lunches.

* * * * *

PART 220—SCHOOL BREAKFAST

PROGRAM

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR

Part 220 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1773, 1779, unless

otherwise noted.

2. In § 220.8, revise paragraph (m) to

read as follows:

§ 220.8 What are the nutrition standards

and menu planning approaches for

breakfasts?

* * * * *

(m) What must schools do about

nutrition disclosure? To the extent that

school food authorities identify foods in

a menu, or on the serving line or

through other available means of

communicating with program

participants, school food authorities

must identify products or dishes

containing more than 30 parts fully

hydrated alternate protein products (as

specified in appendix A of this part) to

less than 70 parts beef, pork, poultry or

seafood on an uncooked basis, in a

manner which does not characterize the

product or dish solely as beef, pork,

poultry or seafood. Additionally, FNS

encourages schools to inform the

students, parents, and the public about

efforts they are making to meet the

nutrition standards (see paragraph (a) of

this section) for school breakfasts.

Dated: June 2, 2000.

George A. Braley,

Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition

Service.

[FR Doc. 00–14385 Filed 6–7–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–30–U

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 99–NE–07–AD; Amendment 39–

1171; AD 2000–11–22]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Allison

Engine Company AE 3007A and AE

3007C Series Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD),

applicable to Allison Engine Company

AE 3007A and AE 3007C series turbofan

engines. This AD requires revisions to

the Airworthiness Limitations Section

of the Allison Engine Company AE

3007A and AE 3007C Engine Manuals to

include required enhanced inspection of

selected critical life-limited parts at

each piece-part exposure. This AD also

requires an air carrier’s approved

continuous airworthiness maintenance

program to incorporate these inspection

procedures. Air carriers with an

approved continuous airworthiness

maintenance program will be allowed to

either maintain the records showing the

current status of the inspections using

the record keeping system specified in

the air carrier’s maintenance manual or

establish an acceptable alternate method

36318 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 111 / Thursday, June 8, 2000 / Rules and Regulations

of record keeping. This amendment is

prompted by an FAA study of in-service

events involving uncontained failures of

critical rotating engine parts that

indicated the need for improved

inspections. The improved inspections

are needed to identify those critical

rotating parts with conditions that, if

allowed to continue in service, could

result in uncontained failures. The

actions specified by this AD are

intended to prevent critical life-limited

rotating engine part failure, which could

result in an uncontained engine failure

and damage to the airplane.

DATES: Effective August 7, 2000.

ADDRESSES: The Rules Docket may be

examined at the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), New England

Region, Office of the Regional Counsel,

12 New England Executive Park,

Burlington, MA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chung-Der Young, Aerospace Engineer,

Chicago Aircraft Certification Office,

FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 2300

East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL

60018; telephone (847) 294–7309, fax

(847) 294–7834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A

proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to

include an airworthiness directive (AD)

that is applicable to Allison Engine

Company AE 3007A and AE 3007C

series turbofan engines was published

in the Federal Register on August 17,

1999 (64 FR 44667). That action

proposed to require revisions to the

Airworthiness Limitations Section in

the Allison Engine Company AE 3007A

and AE 3007C Engine Manuals to

include required enhanced inspection of

selected critical life-limited parts at

each piece-part exposure. It also

proposed to require an air carrier’s

approved continuous airworthiness

maintenance program to incorporate

these inspection procedures.

Editorial Change

The FAA has deleted the phrase ‘‘of

this chapter’’ from the first sentence of

paragraph (e) to eliminate confusion.

Conclusion

Interested persons have been afforded

an opportunity to participate in the

making of this amendment. One

commenter supports the rule as written.

No comments were received on the

FAA’s economic analysis. The FAA has

determined that air safety and the

public interest require the adoption of

the rule with the change described

previously.

Revised Economic Analysis

Since the FAA issued the notice of

proposed rulemaking (NPRM), the

Allison AE3007A and AE3007C engine

fleet has increased to 660 engines

worldwide, but the U.S. fleet has

decreased to 429 engines. The FAA

continues to estimate that it will take

approximately one work hour per

engine to accomplish the required fan

inspections and that the average labor

rate is $60 per work hour. Assuming

every engine underwent an inspection

every year, based on these figures the

total cost impact of this AD would be

$60 per engine per year, for a total

annual cost on U.S. operators of

$25,740.

Regulatory Impact

This rule does not have federalism

implications, as defined in Executive

Order 13132, because it does not have

a substantial direct effect on the States,

on the relationship between the national

government and the States, or on the

distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government. Accordingly, the

FAA has not consulted with state

authorities prior to publication of this

rule.

For the reasons discussed above, I

certify that this action (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3)

will not have a significant economic

impact, positive or negative, on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has

been prepared for this action and is

contained in the Rules Docket. A copy

of it may be obtained from the Rules

Docket at the location provided under

the caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation

safety, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation

Administration amends part 39 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

adding the following new airworthiness

directive:

2000–11–22 Allison Engine Company:

Amendment 39–11771. Docket 99–NE–

07–AD.

Applicability

Allison Engine Company AE 3007A, AE

3007A1/1, AE 3007A1/2, AE 3007A1/3, AE

3007A1, AE 3007A3, AE 3007A1P and AE

3007C series turbofan engines, installed on

but not limited to EMBRAER EMB–135 and

EMB–145 series and Cessna 750 series

airplanes.

Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD)

applies to each engine identified in the

preceding applicability provision, regardless

of whether it has been modified, altered, or

repaired in the area subject to the

requirements of this AD. For engines that

have been modified, altered, or repaired so

that the performance of the requirements of

this AD is affected, the owner/operator must

request approval for an alternative method of

compliance in accordance with paragraph (c)

of this AD. The request should include an

assessment of the effect of the modification,

alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition

addressed by this AD; if the unsafe condition

has not been eliminated, the request should

include specific proposed actions to address

it.

Compliance

Required as indicated, unless previously

accomplished.

To prevent critical life-limited rotating

engine part failure, which could result in an

uncontained engine failure and damage to

the airplane, accomplish the following:

Inspections

(a) Within the next 30 days after the

effective date of this AD, revise the

Airworthiness Limitations Section of the

Allison Engine Company AE 3007A and AE

3007C Engine Manuals, and for air carrier

operations revise the approved continuous

airworthiness maintenance program, by

adding the following:

‘‘MANDATORY INSPECTIONS

(1) Perform inspections of the following

parts at each piece-part opportunity in

accordance with the instructions provided in

the applicable manual provisions:

Part nomenclature Part No. (P/N) Inspect per engine manual chapter

Wheel, Fan ...................................... All ................................................... 72–21–21 (Task 72–21–21–200–801)

Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 111 / Thursday, June 8, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 36319

(2) For the purposes of these mandatory

inspections, piece-part opportunity means:

(i) The part is completely disassembled

when done in accordance with the

disassembly instructions in the engine

manufacturer’s Heavy Maintenance Manual;

and

(ii) The part has accumulated more than

100 cycles in service since the last piece-part

opportunity inspection, provided that the

part was not damaged or related to the cause

for its removal from the engine.’’

(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of

this AD, and notwithstanding contrary

provisions in § 43.16 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR 43.16), these mandatory

inspections shall be performed only in

accordance with the Airworthiness

Limitations Section of the Allison Engine

Company AE 3007A and AE 3007C Engine

Manuals.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

(c) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Engine Certification

Office (ECO). Operators shall submit their

requests through an appropriate FAA

Principal Maintenance Inspector (PMI), who

may add comments and then send it to the

ECO.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this airworthiness directive,

if any, may be obtained from the ECO.

Ferry Flights

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with §§ 21.197 and 21.199 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197

and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a

location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance

Program

(e) FAA-certificated air carriers that have

an approved continuous airworthiness

maintenance program in accordance with the

record keeping requirement of § 121.369 (c)

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

121.369 (c)) must maintain records of the

mandatory inspections that result from

revising the Airworthiness Limitations

Section and the air carrier’s continuous

airworthiness program. Alternately,

certificated air carriers may establish an

approved system of record retention that

provides a method for preservation and

retrieval of the maintenance records that

include the inspections resulting from this

AD and include the policy and procedures

for implementing this alternate method in the

air carrier’s maintenance manual required by

§ 121.369 (c) of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR 121.369 (c)). However,

the alternate system must be accepted by the

appropriate PMI and require the maintenance

records be maintained either indefinitely or

until the work is repeated. Records of the

piece-part inspections are not required under

§ 121.380 (a) (2) (vi) of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR 121.380 (a) (2) (vi)). All

other operators must maintain the records of

mandatory inspections required by the

applicable regulations governing their

operations.

Note 3: The requirements of this AD have

been met when the engine manual changes

are made and air carriers have modified their

continuous airworthiness maintenance plans

to reflect the requirements in the engine

manuals.

Effective Date

(f) This amendment becomes effective on

August 7, 2000.

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on

June 2, 2000.

David A. Downey,

Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 00–14441 Filed 6–7–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 310, 352, and 700

[Docket No. 78N–0038]

RIN 0910–AA01

Sunscreen Drug Products for Over-theCounter Human Use; Final Monograph;

Extension of Effective Date; Reopening

of Administrative Record

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,

HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; extension of effective

date; reopening of administrative

record.

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug

Administration (FDA) is extending to

December 31, 2002, the effective date for

the final monograph for over-thecounter (OTC) sunscreen drug products

that published in the Federal Register of

May 21, 1999 (64 FR 27666). The final

monograph established conditions

under which OTC sunscreen drug

products are generally recognized as

safe and effective and not misbranded.

The extension of the effective date

applies to all OTC sunscreen drug

products that would be regulated under

parts 310, 352, and 700 (21 CFR parts

310, 352, and 700). In addition, FDA is

reopening the administrative record for

the rulemaking for OTC sunscreen drug

products to allow for comment

specifically on the information

requested in this document. FDA is

taking this action in response to a

citizen petition requesting that the

agency, among other things, initiate an

administrative process to publish a

‘‘comprehensive’’ sunscreen final

monograph that addresses formulation,

labeling, and testing requirements for

both ultraviolet B (UVB) and ultraviolet

A (UVA) radiation protection.

DATES: Effective date: The effective date

of the amendments to parts 310, 352,

and 700 in the regulation published at

64 FR 27666, May 21, 1999, is delayed

until December 31, 2002. The

amendment in this final rule to

§ 310.545 is effective December 31,

2002.

Compliance dates: For products with

annual sales less than $25,000

compliance is December 31, 2003. For

all other OTC drug products compliance

is December 31, 2002.

Comment date: Submit written

comments by September 6, 2000. The

administrative record will remain open

until September 6, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments

to the Dockets Management Branch

(HFA–305), Food and Drug

Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.

1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donald Dobbs, Center for Drug

Evaluation and Research (HFD–560),

Food and Drug Administration, 5600

Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,

301–827–2222.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

In the Federal Register of May 12,

1993 (58 FR 28194), the agency

published a notice of proposed

rulemaking in the form of a tentative

final monograph (TFM) for OTC

sunscreen drug products. The TFM

proposed the conditions under which

sunscreen drug products would be

considered generally recognized as safe

and effective, under section 201(p) of

the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 321(p)), and not

misbranded under section 502 of the act

(21 U.S.C. 352).

The TFM proposed labeling for

products that claim to protect against

UVB radiation and discussed the types

of labeling claims that could be used for

products that contain UVA-absorbing

ingredients. The TFM included a list of

proposed sunscreen active ingredients,

including ingredients that were believed

to have absorption spectra extending

into the UVA range.

The TFM proposed a set of testing

procedures for measuring a product’s

sun protection factor (SPF). The SPF

value measures the performance of

sunscreens that absorb erythemacausing UV radiation, but does not fully

describe a product’s UVA protection. As

the agency acknowledged in the TFM,

‘‘currently there is no generally

acceptable method for determining a