alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36688-36689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2236-000]


Worthington Generation L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 5, 2000.
    Worthington Generation L.L.C. (Worthington) submitted for filing a 
rate schedule under which Worthington will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions as a marketer. Worthington also requested 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Worthington 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Worthington.
    On May 31, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Worthington should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE. Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Worthington is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Worthington's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.

[[Page 36689]]

    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 30, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14631 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

AMIN LAKHANI,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TOBACCO ROAD PROPERTY 

HOLDINGS, LLC and TBS MIAMI, LLC

Defendants.

Case No.: 22-cv-23185-DPG

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

AS TO DEFENDANTS, TOBACCO ROAD PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC 

and TBS MIAMI, LLC

Plaintiff, AMIN LAKHANI, and Defendants, TOBACCO ROAD PROPERTY 

HOLDINGS, LLC and TBS MIAMI, LLC, by and through their respective counsel, pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice

against Defendants, TOBACCO ROAD PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC and TBS 

MIAMI, LLC with each party to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs except as otherwise 

agreed in writing.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Glenn R. Goldstein s/Alexander Pastukh 

Glenn R. Goldstein (Fla. Bar. No. 55873) Alexander Pastukh (Fla. Bar No. 809551)

Glenn R. Goldstein & Associates Alexander Pastukh, P.A.

E-mail: ggoldstein@g2legal.net E-mail: apastukh@appalaw.com

8101 Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 504 1395 Brickell Avenue, Ste. 800

Miami, FL 33138 Miami, FL 33131

Tel: (305) 900-2373 Tel: (305) 502-5715

s/Alex Tirado-Luciano

Alex Tirado-Luciano (Fla. Bar No. 070894)

Tirado-Luciano & Tirado

E-mail: atl@tltirado.com

2655 Le Jeune Rd., Suite 1109

Coral Gables, FL 33134

Tel: (305) 390-2320

Case 1:22-cv-23185-DPG Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 3010.170 Information requests. ( a ) An information request is an informal discovery mechanism used at the discretion of the Commission, the Chairman of the Commission, or a presiding officer to obtain information that is likely to materially assist the Commission in the conduct of its proceedings, in the preparation of its reports, or in the performance of its functions under title 39 of the United States Code.
( b ) Information requests may be used to: ( 1 ) Require the Postal Service in any proceeding, or any party to a Commission hearing on the record, to provide any information, and associated documents or things in its possession or control, or any information, and any associated documents or things that it can obtain through reasonable effort and expense; or
( 2 ) Request that any person other than the Postal Service or a party to a Commission hearing on the record provide any information, and any associated documents or things that it can obtain through reasonable effort and expense.
( c ) Information that can be sought by information request includes, but is not limited to, explanations, confirmations, factual descriptions, data, documents, and other materials. Documents refer to hard copy or electronic conveyance of information and may be stored in any medium from which information can be obtained either directly or, if necessary, after translation into a reasonably usable form. Documents include, but are not limited to, writings, notes, graphs, charts, data files, emails, drawings, photographs, and images. Materials include all matter, other than documents, that convey information.
( d ) Information requests shall describe the information, documents, or things sought; shall briefly explain the reason for the request; and shall specify a date by which the response(s) shall be due.
( e ) Any person may request the issuance of an information request by motion. The motion shall list the information, documents, or things sought; shall explain the reasons the information request should be issued; and shall demonstrate why the information sought is relevant and material to the Commission's duties under title 39 of the United States Code. Upon consideration of the motion and any responses, the Commission, the Chairman of the Commission, or presiding officer may issue an information request that includes some or all of the proposed questions or modified versions of some or all of the proposed questions. Motions that do not result in the issuance of an information request prior to the Commission's final decision in the docket shall be deemed denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                         STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Reclamation Consulting and
Applications, Inc. (the "Company"). This Certificate is made pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the report
on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the "10-KSB/A
Report").

The undersigned certifies that the 10-KSB/A Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the 10-KSB/A Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

Date: January 10, 2008                                  /s/ PAUL HUGHES
----------------------                                  ---------------
                                                        Paul Hughes
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. and will be retained
by Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

[Docket No. R-1072]


Privacy Act of 1974; Notice of New System of Records

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

ACTION: Notice of new system of records; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Privacy Act, the Board of Governors of 
the Federal Reserve System (Board) is adopting in final a recently 
published new system of records, entitled Multi-rater Feedback Records 
(BGFRS-25). One minor revision has been made to the initial notice, 
which was published on May 30, 2000.

DATES: This correction is effective June 28, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine M. Boutilier, Managing Senior 
Counsel, Legal Division (202/452-2418), or Chris Fields, Manager, Human 
Resources Function, Management Division (202/452-3654), Board of 
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and Constitution, NW., 
Washington, DC 20551.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 30, 2000, the Board published a notice of a new system of 
records entitled Multi-rater Feedback Records (65 FR 34471). Comments 
on the proposed system of records were requested, and the notice stated 
that the new system of records would become effective on June 28, 2000, 
without further action, unless the Board published a notice to the 
contrary.

Need for Correction

    In the Federal Register of May 30, 2000, in FR Doc. 00-13126, on 
page 34472, in the second column remove routine use ``h,'' and 
redesignate routine uses ``i'' and ``j'' as ``h'' and ``i'', 
respectively. Otherwise, the system of records remains as proposed and 
will become effective on June 28, 2000, as stated in the earlier 
notice.
    Because this is a minor change, no reports are required to be filed 
with the Chair of the House Committee on Government Reform and 
Oversight, the Chair of the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, 
or the Office of Management and Budget.

    By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, acting through the Secretary of the Board under delegated 
authority, June 8, 2000.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-14934 Filed 6-3-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By /s/ William S. Ayer
______________________
William S. Ayer
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
May 6, 2005
Exhibit 10.45

December 29, 2009

Mr. Davin A. Mackenzie

[Address]



| | RE: | Service on AsiaInfo-Linkage Integration Committee
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------

Dear Davin,

As weve previously discussed, the board of directors (the
Board) of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc. (the Company) believes that it would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders for a member of the Board to serve on an integration committee (the
Integration Committee) to be formed promptly following the closing of the planned acquisition of Linkage Technologies Investment Limited (Linkage Technologies). The Integration Committee will be tasked with
overseeing the integration of the Company and Linkage Technologies into a single functioning company. The Board, in fulfilling its duties to the Company, desires to have significant insight into, and receive regular updates regarding, this
integration process. Accordingly, the Board requests that you serve on the Integration Committee in your role as a member of the Board, which service will commence immediately following the formation of the Integration Committee.

In recognition of the significant amount of time that you will need to expend in fulfilling your duties as a member of the Integration
Committee, you will receive US$800 in additional Board fees for each hour with the annual cap of US$120,000 that you serve on the Integration Committee. Such hourly fee will be pro-rated on an hourly basis for any partial time during which you serve
on the Integration Committee. You acknowledge that such fees are related solely to your service as a member of the Board, and not pursuant to any separate consulting or other relationship with the Company or the Integration Committee. For the
avoidance of doubt, such fees will be in addition to the annual retainer and Board and committee meeting attendance fees you currently receive with respect to your service as a member of the Board. You will also be reimbursed for your reasonable and
actual out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred when attending meetings of the Integration Committee.

It is the intent of the
parties to this letter agreement that you continue to qualify as an independent director of the Board in accordance NASDAQ Rule 5605(a) (2) and the provisions of the Boards Corporate Governance Guidelines.

This letter agreement will become effective upon the later of the following events: (i) the formation of the Integration Committee,
and (ii) the approval of the form and terms of this letter agreement by the Board, the Compensation Committee of the Board and the Audit Committee of the Board, in each case in accordance with the Boards Corporate Governance Guidelines
then in effect.



---

Sincerely,/s/ James DingJames DingChairman of the Board of Directors




|                        
|------------------------
|AGREED AND ACCEPTED:    
|                        
|/s/ Davin A. Mackenzie  
|Mr. Davin A. Mackenzie  
|Dated: December 29, 2009
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of AMERCO (the
“Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5,
2009 (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Shoen, President and Chairman of the Board of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:






(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







AMERCO,




a Nevada
corporation





/s/ Edward J.
Shoen




Edward J.
Shoen


President
and Chairman of the Board


Date:  August
5, 2009
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"How does an AF Extended Debriefing work?","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"th4wZJpqJv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/08-afedp-how\/\">How does an AF Extended Debriefing work?<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/08-afedp-how\/embed\/#?secret=th4wZJpqJv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“How does an AF Extended Debriefing work?” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"th4wZJpqJv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
#### § 2.2 Agent for receipt of process.

The General Counsel of the Postal Service shall act as agent for the receipt of legal process against the Postal Service, and as agent for the receipt of legal process against the Board of Governors or a member of the Board, in his or her official capacity, and all other officers and employees of the Postal Service to the extent that the process arises out of the official functions of those officers and employees. The General Counsel shall also issue public certifications concerning closed meetings of the Board as appropriate under 5 U.S.C. 552b(f).
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Paperson the solar constant.**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:3/3
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001060314
 
June 15, 2018
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 0 2 - 10 - 00 343 - CR

GEORGE WADE DUKES APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------ FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------ Appellant George Wade Dukes attempts to appeal from his conviction for solicitation of sexual assault of a child under seventeen years of age, fo r which, pursuant to a plea bargain, he pleaded guilty and received three years’
confinement. On August 19, 2010, this court sent the parties a letter stating that the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal states that this is a plea

- bargain

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

cas e and appellant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)( 2). We informed the parties that this appeal may be dismissed unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court, on or before Monday, August 30, 2010, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We have received no response

. R ule 25.2(a)(2) of the appellate rules of procedure provides that in a plea

b argain case , an appellant may appeal only “ those matters that were raised by
written motion filed and ruled on before trial” or “ after getting the trial court’ s permission to appeal. ” Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Here, appellant waived all pretrial motions, and the trial court has not given permission to appeal. Because
the trial court certified that appellant possesses no right o f appeal, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2 (a)(2), (d) , 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM
PANEL: MCCOY , MEIER and GABRIEL , JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: October 14, 2010
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

 

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-35756 of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-101957 of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 5, 2004,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Orlando, Florida 

March 5, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                             382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                       365
<INVENTORY>                                     10,041
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,103
<PP&E>                                          38,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,704
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,418
<BONDS>                                         12,026
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,140
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,113)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,520
<SALES>                                         18,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,803
<CGS>                                           13,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    658
<INCOME-TAX>                                       256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                402
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       402
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>