alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### OLD KING COLE, Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 13614.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 3, 1958.

*531Robert M. Rybolt, of Day, Cope, Ket-terer, Raley & Wright, Canton, Ohio, for petitioner.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before SIMONS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This matter was heard on a motion by the National Labor Relations Board for judgment on the pleadings. The case is here on a petition to review and set aside, vacate and annul an Order of the National Labor Relations Board and to dismiss the Board’s complaint against the petitioner.

The Board’s Order sought to be reviewed was to require the petitioner to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively with the certified bargaining representatives of its employees.

After determination by the Labor Board that the discharge of four of the petitioner’s employees whose challenged votes were determinative of the representation election held in June, 1956, was an unfair labor practice and that said discharged employees’ votes must be counted, the Union, on March 7, 1957, was certified by the Board as the bargaining agent of the petitioner’s employees.

In April, 1957, the Company refused to bargain with the Union because: (1) a petition to review the determination by the Labor Board of the employees’ status was pending in this Court; and (2) such a change in the bargaining unit had taken place since the election as to raise a question whether the Union was the representative of the employees. On December 14, 1957, a cease and desist order was entered by the Board.

 The second point is disposed of by the decision of the Supreme Court in Brooks v. N. L. R. B., 1954, 348 U.S. 96, 75 S.Ct. 176, 99 L.Ed. 125, that a representation election may not be held within one year of certification by the Board. See also N. L. R. B. v. Tennessee Coach Co., 6 Cir., 1956, 237 F.2d 907.

*532 As to the first point, since this Court on January 7, 1958, in Old King Cole, Inc., v. N. L. R. B., 250 F.2d 791, found that the four employees were wrongfully discharged, the refusal to bargain in April, 1957, automatically became based upon an erroneous view of the law. That good faith is not available as a defense to a charge of refusal to bargain where the refusal is based upon an erroneous view of the law is supported by the decision in Taylor Forge & Pipe Works v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 1956, 234 F.2d 227.

This last is, in the circumstances of this case, merely another way of stating that the filing of a petition for review of an order of the Labor Board does not operate as a stay of the Board’s order, which is consistent with Section 10(g) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. Section 160(g).

The motion for judgment on the pleadings is therefore granted, and it is ordered that the cease and desist order of December 14, 1957, be and it hereby is enforced. It follows from the foregoing that the petition to review the Order of the Labor Board should and will be dismissed.
§ 777.33 Expenses incidental to transfer of title to the Postal Service. ( a ) *Reimbursement.* When property is acquired through the exercise or the threat of the exercise of eminent domain, the owner shall be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses he or she necessarily incurred in conveying the real property to the Postal Service for: ( 1 ) Recording fees, transfer taxes, documentary stamps, evidence of title, boundary surveys, legal descriptions of the real property, and similar incidental expenses. However, the Postal Service will not pay costs solely required to perfect the owner's title to the real property.
( 2 ) Penalty costs and other charges for prepayment of any preexisting recorded mortgage, entered into in good faith, encumbering the real property.
( 3 ) The pro rata portion of any prepaid real property taxes which are allocable to the period after the Postal Service obtains title to the property or effective possession of it, whichever is earlier.
( b ) *Direct Payment.* Whenever feasible the Postal Service must pay these costs directly and thus avoid the need for an owner to pay such costs and then seek reimbursement from the Postal Service.
( c ) *Certain Litigation Expenses.* The owner of the real property acquired must be reimbursed any reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorney, appraisal, and engineering fees which the owner actually incurred because of a condemnation proceeding if: ( 1 ) The final judgment of the court is that the Postal Service cannot acquire the real property by condemnation; or
( 2 ) The condemnation proceeding is abandoned by the Postal Service other than under an agreed-upon settlement; or
( 3 ) The court having jurisdiction renders a judgment in favor of the owner in an inverse condemnation proceeding or the Postal Service effects a settlement of such a proceeding.
#### § 162.5 Definitions.

The following definition applies to this part:

*Merchant mariner credential or MMC* means the credential issued by the Coast Guard under 46 CFR part 10. It combines the individual merchant mariner's document, license, and certificate of registry enumerated in 46 U.S.C. subtitle II part E as well as the STCW endorsement into a single credential that serves as the mariner's qualification document, certificate of identification, and certificate of service.

[USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11212, Mar. 16, 2009]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant.

/

PRELIMINARY ORDER ON MOTION

FOR JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT AND ADDITIONAL RELIEF

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Judicial Oversight and 

Additional Relief [ECF No. 1] and Supplemental Filing [ECF No. 28]. Upon review of Plaintiff’s 

submissions and the exceptional circumstances presented, and subject to an opportunity to be heard 

as indicated below, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Pursuant to Rule 53(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court’s inherent 

authority, and without prejudice to the parties’ objections, the Court hereby provides notice 

of its preliminary intent to appoint a special master in this case. 

2. A hearing on the Motion is scheduled for September 1, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. The hearing 

shall be conducted at the Paul G. Rogers U.S. Courthouse, 701 Clematis Street, 

Courtroom 1, West Palm Beach Florida, Florida 33401. 

3. The parties shall adhere to the following instructions:

a. On or before August 30, 2022, Defendant shall publicly file a Response to the 

Motion and Supplement, including Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of a 

special master. 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2022 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON

2

b. In addition to the Response, on or before August 30, 2022, Defendant shall file 

under seal the following materials:

i. A more detailed Receipt for Property specifying all property seized pursuant 

to the search warrant executed on August 8, 2022.

ii. A particularized notice indicating the status of Defendant’s review of the 

seized property, including any filter review conducted by the privilege 

review team and any dissemination of materials beyond the privilege review 

team. 

c. Plaintiff shall file a Reply to Defendant’s Response on or before August 31, 2022, 

at 8:00 p.m.

d. In accordance with Rule 53, the parties are advised to include in their filings their 

respective and particularized positions on the duties and responsibilities of a 

prospective special master, along with any other considerations pertinent to the

appointment of a special master in this case. 

4. This Order should not be construed as a final determination on Plaintiff’s Motion.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 27th day of August 

2022.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 76.01-5 Sale of condemned equipment.

When any condemned supplies, materials, or equipment cannot be profitably used in work of the Coast Guard, they will be disposed of under appropriate regulations of the General Services Administration. Applications for purchase of such materials may be submitted to the Commandant who will process them for further action under the applicable regulations.
#### § 501.13 False representations of Postal Service actions.

Providers, their agents, and employees must not intentionally misrepresent to customers of the Postal Service decisions, actions, or proposed actions of the Postal Service respecting its regulation of Postage Evidencing Systems. The Postal Service reserves the right to suspend and/or revoke the authorization to manufacture or distribute Postage Evidencing Systems throughout the United States or any part thereof pursuant to § 501.6 when it determines that the provider, its agents, or employees failed to comply with this section.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant.

/

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court following the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion vacating 

the Court’s September 5, 2022 Order [ECF No. 64] and instructing the Court to dismiss the 

underlying civil action. See Trump v. United States, No. 22-13005 (11th Cir. Dec. 1, 2022). 

Pursuant to that opinion and the associated mandate, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. This case is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

2. Any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, any pending motions are DENIED AS 

MOOT, and all deadlines are TERMINATED.

3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 12th day of December

2022.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 199 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2022 Page 1 of 1
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-81294-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING

Plaintiff, through the undersigned counsel, hereby files its Response to the Government’s 

Brief on Global Issues, attached as Attachment A. The Response Brief was provided to the Special 

Master and counsel of record on November 12, 2022.

Dated: November 14, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Lindsey Halligan .

Lindsey Halligan

Florida Bar No. 109481 

511 SE 5th Avenue

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Email: lindseyhalligan@outlook.com

James M. Trusty

Ifrah Law PLLC

1717 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 650

Washington, D.C. 20006

Telephone: (202) 524-4176

Email: jtrusty@ifrahlaw.com

Christopher M. Kise

Chris Kise & Associates, P.A.

201 East Park Avenue, 5th Floor

Tallahassee, FL 32301

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 1 of 3
2

Telephone: (850) 270-0566

Email: chris@ckise.net

M. Evan Corcoran 

Silverman Thompson Slutkin White, LLC

400 East Pratt Street – Suite 900 

Baltimore, MD 21202 

Telephone: (410) 385-2225 

Email: ecorcoran@silvermanthompson.com 

Counsel for Plaintiff Donald J. Trump

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 14, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF.

/s/ Lindsey Halligan .

Lindsey Halligan

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 183 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5072 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5072

  To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain 
     hydroelectric projects located in the State of West Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Mollohan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain 
     hydroelectric projects located in the State of West Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission projects 
numbered 6901, 6902, and 7307, the Commission may, at the request of 
the project licensee, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 
the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that 
section and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the 
time period required for commencement of construction of the project 
concerned for 3 consecutive 2-year periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--Each extension under subsection (a) shall take 
on the date of the expiration of the extension issued by the Commission 
under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) of the period 
required for commencement of construction of the project concerned.
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of a project described in subsection (a) 
has expired before the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission shall reinstate the license for that project effective as of 
the date of its expiration and the first extension authorized under 
subsection (a) for that project shall take effect on the date of such 
expiration.
                                 <all>
```
### Stratigraphy, depositional environments, and paleogeography of coal-bearing strata in the Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group, central Grand Hogback, Garfield County, Colorado

By: D. J. Madden-McGuire

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1485

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (21639 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 264.2 Policy.

It is the policy of the U.S. Postal Service to ensure the availability of all records considered critical to the continuity of its operations and the preservation of the rights and interests of the Postal Service, its employees, contractors, and customers. Vital records shall be routinely maintained at predesignated off-site locations to ensure their availability when needed by management and operating personnel.
§ 62.63 Recommendations. ( a ) The public may recommend changes to existing aids to navigation, request new aids or the discontinuation of existing aids, and report aids no longer necessary for maritime safety. These recommendations should be sent to the appropriate District Commander.
( b ) Recommendations, requests and reports should be documented with as much information as possible to justify the proposed action. Desirable information includes: ( 1 ) Nature of the vessels which transit the area(s) in the question, including type, displacement, draft, and number of passengers and crew.
( 2 ) Where practicable, the kinds of navigating devices used aboard such vessels (e.g, magnetic or gyro compasses, radio direction finders, radar, loran, and searchlights).
( 3 ) A chartlet or sketch describing the actual or proposed location of the aid(s), and a description of the action requested or recommended.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Voting Membership","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8B1YSF02Ur\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/voting-membership\/\">Voting Membership<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/voting-membership\/embed\/#?secret=8B1YSF02Ur\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Voting Membership” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"8B1YSF02Ur\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
1 

## NO. 12

- 10

- 00043

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DAVID GEORGE BAUGH, § APPEAL FROM THE 2ND

APPELLANT

V.

ISAACS WRECKER SERVICE, LLC

, § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

KEITH ISAACS, SAMM IE ISAACS,

TRAVIS CEARLEY, DANIEL

FRANKLIN, JASON PRICE,

REECE DANIEL AND JOHN PAGE,

APPELLEE S § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant

, David George Baugh, attempts to appeal the trial court’s dismissal of his suit

after granting the plea to the jurisdiction filed by Appellees, Isaacs Wrecker Service, LLC, Keith

Isaacs, Sammie Isaacs, Travis Cearley, Daniel Franklin, Jason Price, Reece Daniel, and John

Page. On February 16, 2010, this court notified Baugh that the informa tion received in this

appeal does not include a final judgment or other appealable order. Therefore, the record does

not show that this court has jurisdiction of the appeal. Baugh was further notified that his appeal

would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or before

February 26, 2010 to show the jurisdiction of this court.

In response to this court’s February 16, 2010 notice, Baugh filed a motion to extend the

time for providing a final judgment or other appealabl e order

. The motion was granted, and the

time was extended to April 26, 2010. On April 20, 2010, Baugh filed a second motion to extend

the time for providing the requisite final judgment or other appealable order. That motion was

granted, and the time w as extended to May 5, 2010. The May 5 deadline has now passed, and2

we have not received a final judgment or other appealable order in this appeal. Accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.2, 42.3.

By per curi am opinion May 19 , 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Anderson Y. Lee, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |                          | 
|-------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|/s/ Anderson
 Y. Lee
|                     |                         
|Name:                | Anderson Y.
 Lee         | 
|Title:               | Chief
 Financial Officer
|Date:                | May 10, 2011             | 

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

E-7

---