alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 7, 2012

Linda Irokawa-Otani, Regulations Coordinator

Department of Pesticide Regulation

1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4015

Sacramento, California 95812-4015

Dear Ms. Irokawa-Otani:

I am writing in response to your proposed VOC regulations for Non-Fumigant products. As a retailer 

located in the Central Valley, in Lodi California, I find several problems with your proposal.

GoalTender and other low VOC oxyfluorfen formulations are NOT viable substitutes for Goal 2XL and 

other EC oxyfluorfen products. I have 28 years’ experience in the pest control business working with 

Goal 2XL and GoalTender during that time. When it comes to post emergence weed control, 

GoalTender is not a substitute. My experience in the fields is that Goal 2XL is the only formulation that 

controls hard to control weeds like malva, and helps with glyphosate resistant weeds – marestail, 

flebain. panicle willowherb, fillare, etc.

I have reviewed your list of “additives” and their cost as it pertains to making GoalTender an effective 

post emergence product. Reliable data does not exist that supports your position that these are the 

answer to using GoalTender in place of Goal 2XL. Glyphosate is not an effective tank mix partner due 

to the fact that glyphosate is already the foundation of the spray mix. Adding a pint of glyphosate will 

do nothing for resistant weeds and hard to control weeds. Paraquat is a Restricted Use Pesticide due to 

acute toxicity. Human toxicity and worker exposure concerns make paraquat an extremely poor 

choice. The most likely “kickers” to be added to GoalTender are Rely and Treevix. Rely costs $46/acre 

and is in VERY short supply in 2012. Treevix costs $16/acre and the label recommends the addition of 

Goal to broaden the spectrum. The label also recommends an “adjuvant system” for post emergent 

weed control. This “system” includes methylated seed oil (MSO) plus Ammonium Sulfate (AMS). 

With the additional costs of the adjuvant system, our growers cannot afford to add $20 to $50 per acre 

to their weed control programs.

Providing written information on the VOC regulations, tracking the intended use period, providing 

written recommendations and maintaining records for two years adds costs to my business. I will in 

turn be forced to pass these costs on to our grower customers. This is addition to the $20 to $50 per 

acre calculated above.

I need Goal 2XL in my summer post emergent weed control programs. Its elimination will result in 

significant cost increases and decreased weed control in orchards and vineyards. This decreased weed 

control could even result in additional trips across the field with a tractor and sprayer. Have you 

considered the effect of additional VOC loading from additional spray trips? 

I respectfully request that you find a way to keep Goal 2XL and other EC formulations available during 

the post emergent market months of May through October.

Reguards, 

Bradley Schrenk

Crop Advisor/PCA/CCA

76 Applewood Drive

Lodi, CA 95242
## us.Departmentof 

### Transportation OfficeoftheSecretary ofTransportation 

# -. 'n**~ ~** **,,,~** I f

- , .'f 

# /: 53

MEMORANDUM TO DOCKET 2009-0155 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

On October 12, 2010, the Secretary and Deputy Secretary ofTransportation, accompanied by members oftheir senior staff, met with the Ambassador and other senior representatives ofthe government ofAustralia, and with the Chief Executive Officer and senior officers ofthe Virgin Blue airline group. The participants discussed the ongoing proceeding involving the application for antitrust immunity filed by the Virgin Blue group and Delta Air Lines.
The Department's General Counsel pOinted out that this is an open, public proceeding, and that a summary ofthis meeting will be placed in the docket. The airline representatives noted that they would be filing additional evidentiary material for the Department's consideration, and argued the various benefits to be realized from a grant of immunity.
The Ambassador noted the keen interest that the proceeding held for the government and people ofAustralia, and emphasized the economic significance of aviation links between the United States and Australia and the Open Skies Agreement between the two countries.
FOX, HEFTER, SWIBEL, LEVIN & CARROLL, LLP 200 WEST MADISON STREET,SUITE 3000 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606  TELEPHONE(312) 224-1200 FACSIMILE (312) 224-1201 wwwfhslc.com  THOMAS BRUBANOSKY Email: tburanosky@fhslc.com DIRECT DIAL: (312) 224-1208  June 24, 2008  Via Federal Express  Raven Gold Corp. Mr. Mike Wood #205-598 Main Street President Penticton B.C. Raven Gold Corp. V2A-5C7 7250 NW Expressway Canada 4260 Attn: Gary Haukeland Oklahoma City, OK 73132  Re: La Currita Groupings Agreement Option to Earn Interest and Form Joint Venture dated May 3, 2007 (the "Agreement") by and between Tara Gold Resources Corp. ("Tara Gold") and Raven Gold Corp. ("Raven")  Gentlemen:  This letter is written on behalf of Tara Gold. In a letter dated May 9, 2008, you were notified that Raven had failed to make a payment in the amount of $100,000 which became due on May 3, 2008 in accordance with the terms of Section 5 of the Agreement. As provided in Section 5 of the Agreement, such payment was an express condition to Raven maintaining its interest in the venture.  Demand was made for such payment. You were notified that failure to cure such non-payment within five (5) days of your receipt of that letter would be deemed an event of default under the Agreement and entitle Tara Gold to, among other things, declare the Agreement null and void. Your failure to pay the required payment constitutes a default under the Agreement, and as admitted in your letter dated June 19, 2008, the Agreement is null and void.  Very truly yours,  /s/ Thomas Buranosky  Thomas  Buranosky  TB/da  cc: Francis Richard Biscan Jr. Sudhir Khanna Martin. Carroll, Esq.
exhibit42.htm


 


 



EXHIBIT 4.2












 


ASTIKA HOLDINGS, INC.







A FLORIDA CORPORATION







TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE


140,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE

















This certifies that _________________________________________________ is hereby issued ____________________________________________________ fully paid and non-assessable Shares of Common Stock of Astika Holdings, Inc., transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.







In Witness Whereof, Astika Holdings, Inc. has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed as of the ______ day of _______________ 20___.


 




 








	  	  	  
	
Chief Executive Officer

	
[SEAL]

	
Secretary
§ 72.01-25 Marine broadcast notice to mariners. ( a ) The Coast Guard broadcasts notices to mariners on its own or U.S. Navy radio stations to report navigational warnings containing information of importance to the safety of navigation of vessels, such as the position of ice and derelicts, defects, and changes to aids to navigation, and drifting mines. Radio stations broadcasting marine information are listed in “Radio Navigational Aids” (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Publication 117) and United States Coast Pilots.
( b ) Any person may view or download “Radio Navigational Aids” from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency's Web site (*http://msi.nga.mil/NGAPortal/MSI.portal*); look for “Publications.”
( c ) Any person may purchase *United States Coast Pilots* from NOAA Certified Printer Partners listed at *http://www.nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/staff/print_agents.html#mapTabs-2 .*
[CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33362, June 19, 1997; USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33640, June 25, 2001; USCG-2006-25150, 71 FR 39208, July 12, 2006; USCG-2009-0416, 74 FR 27438, June 10, 2009; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39171, July 1, 2013; USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44279, July 27, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1995
<CASH>                                          81,820
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,898,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,833,792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,914,843
<PP&E>                                      29,978,232
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,847,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,847,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,491,739
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     4,716,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,752,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,847,292
<SALES>                                     47,399,453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,414,114
<CGS>                                       38,075,432
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,427,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               134,114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             883,946
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,031,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (391,791)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (639,238)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 18, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 18, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0062. FORREST ALAN PETTAY v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

180R00131
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

1 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 846.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31289

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM STEPTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-389-G)

December 31, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

William Stepter pleaded guilty to conspir acy to possess cocaine

hydrochloride with intent to distribute, 1 and was sentenced to 60 months2 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

3 Childs v. Collins , 995 F.2d 67 (5th Cir.), cert

. denied , 114 S.Ct. 613 (1993).

2 imprisonment, followed by a four-year term of supervised release, and a $10,000

fine. Stepter did not directly appeal but filed a motion to vacate, correct, or set

aside his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court, acting upon a

magistrate judge’s recommendation, denied the motion; Stepter timely appealed.

Stepter’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California 2 and has moved to withdraw. Stepter has been notified of his right to

respond and has filed a supplemental brief in support of his appeal. Accordingly,

we review the issues raised in brief and the record as a whole to determine whether

there are any nonfrivolous issue(s) on appeal.

The first issue raised is whether Stepter’s trial counsel rendered ineffective

assistance by failing to pursue a direct appeal. The district court found that Stepter

was advised by counsel of his right to appeal, but that Stepter never informed

anyone that he wished to file an appeal. This finding is well supported by the

record. There is no merit whatever in Stepter’s claim that trial counsel’s ineffective

assistance cost him his right to appeal. 3

Stepter also contends that th e sentencing court failed to advise him of his

right to appeal, did not allow him to speak at sentencing, and sentenced him to a4 United States v. Garcia-Flores , 906 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. 1990).

5 United States v. Segler

, 37 F.3d 1131 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Weintraub

, 871

F.2d 1257 (5th Cir. 1989).

6 See Loc.R. 42.2.

3 $10,000 fine without determining whether he had the means to pay. The district

court’s factual finding that Stepter was advised of his right to appeal by trial

counsel defeats the first assertion, 4 an d Stepter’s allocution and excessive fine

claims are not initially cognizable in a section 2255 proceeding. 5

In addition to the issues raised in the brief we have made an independent

review of the record. We find and conclude that this appeal presents no

nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we relieve counsel from further responsibilities

herein and DISMISS Stepter’s appeal. 6
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5193 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5193

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
      To amend the National Housing Act to temporarily extend the 
 applicability of the downpayment simplification provisions for the FHA 
            single family housing mortgage insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Downpayment Simplification 
Extension Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF APPLICABILITY OF DOWNPAYMENT SIMPLIFICATION 
              PROVISIONS.

    Subparagraph (A) of section 203(b)(10) of the National Housing Act 
(12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(10)(A)) is amended by striking ``executed for 
insurance in fiscal years 1998, 1999, and 2000'' and inserting ``closed 
on or before October 30, 2000''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit








INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM


As of September 2019


1. Annual Retainer: $90,000.


2. Committee Fees: audit committee member-$25,000, audit committee chair-$50,000 (inclusive of the audit committee member fee), nominating and corporate governance committee member-$15,000, conflicts committee member-$10,000, conflicts committee chair-$25,000 (inclusive of the conflicts committee member fee).


3. Equity Awards: to be determined from time to time by the board of directors or a committee thereof.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5139 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5139

  To provide for the conveyance of certain real property at the Carl 
 Vinson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2000

 Mr. Norwood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the conveyance of certain real property at the Carl 
 Vinson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AT THE CARL VINSON DEPARTMENT 
              OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, DUBLIN, GEORGIA.

    (a) Conveyance to State Board of Regents.--The Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs shall convey, without consideration, to the Board of 
Regents of the State of Georgia all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to two tracts of real property, including any 
improvements thereon, at the Carl Vinson Department of Veterans Affairs 
Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia, consisting of 39 acres, more or less, 
in Laurens County, Georgia.
    (b) Conveyance to Community Service Board of Middle Georgia.--The 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall convey, without consideration, to 
the Community Service Board of Middle Georgia all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to three tracts of real property, 
including any improvements thereon, at the Carl Vinson Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia, consisting of 58 
acres, more or less, in Laurens County, Georgia.
    (c) Conditions on Conveyance.--The conveyance under subsection (a) 
shall be subject to the condition that the real property conveyed under 
that subsection be used in perpetuity solely for education purposes. 
The conveyance under subsection (b) shall be subject to the condition 
that the real property conveyed under that subsection be used in 
perpetuity solely for education and health care purposes.
    (d) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal description of the real 
property to be conveyed under this section shall be determined by a 
survey or surveys satisfactory to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 
The cost of any such survey shall not be borne by the Secretary.
    (e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs may require such additional terms and conditions in connection 
with the conveyances under this section as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICIALNOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 FILE COPY



## 6/17/2015 Hg! \/w\/L COANo. 12-14-00116-cr Perez, Jose Diaz Tr. Ct. No. 18,373 PD-0728-15 

### On this day, this Court has grantedtheAppellant's Pro Se Motion to Suspend Rule 

# 9.3(b)T.R.A.P. ^^IS^# Abel Acosta, Clerk 12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 

### TYLER, TX 75701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-81294-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

________________________________/

MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF GLOBAL ISSUES BRIEF UNDER SEAL

The United States of America respectfully moves this Court to file under seal, with 

proposed redactions, its brief to the Special Master concerning certain “global issues” 

identified in the course of the Special Master’s review process. See Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 161-

1, 162.

Portions of the government’s brief should be sealed pursuant to the Protective Order 

issued by the Special Master because they “refer[] to” certain Seized Materials or certain 

categories of Seized Materials. D.E. 113 ¶ 3 (“Nothing herein shall prevent a party from using 

Seized Materials as exhibits to pleadings or otherwise, or from referring to, quoting, or reciting 

from Seized Materials in connection with pleadings or motions filed in the above-captioned 

case; provided, however, that any such Seized Materials be filed under seal or submitted to the 

Special Master or Court for in camera inspection.”).1

1 Before filing this motion, the government reached out to Plaintiff’s counsel to ask for 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2022 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests permission to file later today 

its brief to the Special Master under seal, with proposed redactions.

Respectfully submitted,

/s Juan Antonio Gonzalez

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Florida Bar No. 897388

99 NE 4th Street, 8th Floor

Miami, FL 33132

Tel: 305-961-9001

Email: juan.antonio.gonzalez@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 8, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices of 

Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.

s/ Juan Antonio Gonzalez

Juan Antonio Gonzalez

United States Attorney

Plaintiff’s position on the relief requested, but the government has not been able to confirm 

Plaintiff’s position at this time.

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 166 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 3030.161 Density calculation data sources. ( a ) The data needed for the calculation of the density rate authority in § 3030.162 shall be obtained from the values reported by the Postal Service as specified in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section. When both originally filed and annually revised data are available, the originally filed data shall be used. When the originally filed data are corrected through a refiling or in the Commission's Annual Compliance Determination report, the corrected version of the originally filed data shall be used.
( b ) Market dominant volume and total volume from the Revenue, Pieces, and Weight report, filed by the Postal Service under § 3050.25 of this chapter;
( c ) Institutional costs and total costs from the Cost and Revenue Analysis report, filed with the Postal Service's section 3652 report (see § 3050.1(g) of this chapter); and
( d ) The number of delivery points, from the input data used to produce the Total Factor Productivity estimates, filed with the Postal Service's section 3652 report.