alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 322.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this regulation, the following terms are defined: ( a ) The term *navigable waters of the United States* and all other terms relating to the geographic scope of jurisdiction are defined at 33 CFR part 329. Generally, they are those waters of the United States that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide shoreward to the mean high water mark, and/or are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible to use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
( b ) The term *structure* shall include, without limitation, any pier, boat dock, boat ramp, wharf, dolphin, weir, boom, breakwater, bulkhead, revetment, riprap, jetty, artificial island, artificial reef, permanent mooring structure, power transmission line, permanently moored floating vessel, piling, aid to navigation, or any other obstacle or obstruction.
( c ) The term *work* shall include, without limitation, any dredging or disposal of dredged material, excavation, filling, or other modification of a navigable water of the United States.
( d ) The term *letter of permission* means a type of individual permit issued in accordance with the abbreviated procedures of 33 CFR 325.2(e).
( e ) The term *individual permit* means a DA authorization that is issued following a case-by-case evaluation of a specific structure or work in accordance with the procedures of this regulation and 33 CFR part 325, and a determination that the proposed structure or work is in the public interest pursuant to 33 CFR part 320.
( f ) The term *general permit* means a DA authorization that is issued on a nationwide or regional basis for a category or categories of activities when: ( 1 ) Those activities are substantially similar in nature and cause only minimal individual and cumulative environmental impacts; or
( 2 ) The general permit would result in avoiding unnecessary duplication of the regulatory control exercised by another Federal, state, or local agency provided it has been determined that the environmental consequences of the action are individually and cumulatively minimal. (See 33 CFR 325.2(e) and 33 CFR part 330.)
( g ) The term *artificial reef* means a structure which is constructed or placed in the navigable waters of the United States or in the waters overlying the outer continental shelf for the purpose of enhancing fishery resources and commercial and recreational fishing opportunities. The term does not include activities or structures such as wing deflectors, bank stabilization, grade stabilization structures, or low flow key ways, all of which may be useful to enhance fisheries resources.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAFRON HUOT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF 

CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-35128 

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00045-BMM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2018**

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. 

Safron Huot appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging claims related to the termination of her parental 

rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. 

Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-35128 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003) (dismissal 

under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 

(9th Cir. 1998) (order) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Huot’s action for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine because Huot’s claims constituted 

a forbidden de facto appeal of a prior state court judgment or were inextricably 

intertwined with that judgment. See Noel, 341 F.3d at 1163-65 (9th Cir. 2003)

(discussing proper application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine); see also Henrichs 

v. Valley View Dev., 474 F.3d 609, 616 (9th Cir. 2007) (Rooker-Feldman doctrine 

barred plaintiff’s claim because the relief sought “would require the district court 

to determine that the state court’s decision was wrong and thus void”).

AFFIRMED.
#### KATE KENNEDY, Respondent, *v.*GEORGE BARANDON and JOHN BARANDON, Appellants.

*Creditor's bill to reach real estate fraudulently conveyed*— *sale by shm'iff instead of*receiver— *when proper.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Special Term, in an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill to reach the real estate of the defendant George Barandon, alleged to have been mortgaged and conveyed to the defendant John Barandon, with intent to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of the former. The court found that the mortgage and conveyance were fraudulent, and gave judgment declaring the same fraudulent and void as against plaintiff and other creditors, and setting the issue aside, and directing that the real estate be sold on execution by the sheriff, and that the judgment of plaintiff and the costs of this action be paid out of the proceeds of the sale, and the surplus be brought into court. The question in the case was purely one of fact.

The court at General Term held, that it was the usual, and, it thought, the better practice, in this class of cases, to direct the appointment of a receiver, and a sale by him, but that it was not improper to adjudge that the sale be made on execution by the sheriff. (2 Van Sant. Eq. Pr., 158; *Orr*v. *Gilmore, 7*Lans., 345; 5 Wait’s Pr., 655.) ■ As it did not appear thaf there were any other *643creditors, the judgment should have only declared the mortgage and conveyance fraudulent and void as to plaintiff’s judgment, and directed the sale for the payment of that alone, with the costs.

The provision of the judgment directing that the surplus on the sale be brought into court, was not appropriate to the case made by the pleadings and proofs. (*Wilder*v. Keeler, 3 Paige, 164; *Kerr*v. Blodgett, 48 N. Y., 62; Wait’s Pr., 653-654.) The judgment was modified by striking out that direction, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs.

*Edward Van*Ness, for the appellants.

*C. C.*Bigelow, for the respondent.

Opinions by

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J.

Daniels, J., concurred.

Judgment, as modified, affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 14, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14997]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Request for Public Comments on Information Collection To Be 
Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for Review Under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act

    A request revising and extending the collection of information 
listed below will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
for approval under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of the proposed collection of information 
and related forms may be obtained by contacting the USGS Clearance 
Officer at the phone number listed below. Comments and suggestions on 
the requirement should be made within 60 days directly to the USGS 
Clearance Officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 807 National Center, Reston, 
VA 20192.
    As required by OMB regulations at CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the U.S. 
Geological Survey solicits specific public comments regarding the 
proposed information collectoin as to:
    1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the USGS, including whether the 
information will have practical utility;
    2. The accuracy of the USGS estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information, including the validity of the methbodology 
and assumptions used;
    3. The utility, quality, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and,
    4. How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology.
    Title: Production Estimate, Construction Sand and Gravel and 
Crushed and Broken Stone.
    Current OMB approval number: 1028-0065.
    Abstract: This collection is needed to provide data on mineral 
production for annual reports published by commodity for use by 
Government agencies, industry, education programs, and the general 
public. One publication is the ``Mineral Commodity Summaries,'' the 
first preliminary publication to furnish estimates covering the 
previous year's nonfuel mineral industry.
    Bureau form numbers: 9-4042-A and 9-4124-A.
    Frequency: Quarterly and Annually.
    Description of respondents: Producers of industrial minerals and 
metals.
    Annual Responses: 3,450.
    Annual burden hours: 742.
    Bureau clearance officer: John Cordyack, 703-648-7313.

John H. DeYoung, Jr.,
Chief Scientist, Minerals Information Team.
[FR Doc. 00-14997 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M
#### § 255.9 Other postal regulations; authority of postal managers and employees.

This part supplements all other postal regulations. Nothing in this part is intended either to repeal, modify, or amend any other postal regulation, to authorize any postal manager or employee to violate or exceed any regulatory limit, or to confer any budgetary authority on any postal official or employee outside normal budgetary procedures.
§ 88.07 Public safety activities. ( a ) Vessels engaged in government sanctioned public safety activities, and commercial vessels performing similar functions, may display an alternately flashing red and yellow light signal. This identification light signal must be located so that it does not interfere with the visibility of the vessel's navigation lights. The identification light signal may be used only as an identification signal and conveys no special privilege. Vessels using the identification light signal during public safety activities must abide by the Inland Navigation Rules, and must not presume that the light or the exigency gives them precedence or right of way.
( b ) Public safety activities include but are not limited to patrolling marine parades, regattas, or special water celebrations; traffic control; salvage; firefighting; medical assistance; assisting disabled vessels; and search and rescue.
[79 FR 37925, July 2, 2014, as amended by USCG-2012-0102, 79 FR 68622, Nov. 18, 2014]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-6714-1] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed settlement. 

# SUMMARY:

Under section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to settle claims for response costs at the Lancaster Plating Site (Site) located in Lillington, North Carolina, with Kimrick, Inc. EPA will consider public comments on the proposed settlement for thirty days. EPA may withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicate the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887. 

Written comments may be submitted to Ms. Batchelor at the above address within 30 days of the date of publication. 

Dated: May 25, 2000. 

Franklin E. Hill, 

Chief, CERCLA Program Services Branch, Waste Management Division. 

[FR Doc. 00-14772 Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
##### 





EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for
the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley D. Tilden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| |     |  |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
|
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By
    
    /s/ Bradley D. TildenBradley D. TildenChief Financial OfficerDecember 23, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALLEN
TELECOM'S JUNE 30, 1998 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,069
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,129)
<INVENTORY>                                     94,148
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               241,211
<PP&E>                                         110,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                (52,095)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 493,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,373
<BONDS>                                        131,777
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,751
<OTHER-SE>                                     218,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   493,470
<SALES>                                        211,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,382
<CGS>                                        (157,908)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (157,908)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (54,952)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (143)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,987)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)<F1>
<FN>
<FN>
<F1> THE EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NO. 128, "EARNINGS PER
SHARE." THE ABOVE CAPTIONS FOR PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED INCLUDE THE BASIC AND
DILUTED EPS AMOUNTS, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 245.1 Purpose.

This part describes administrative procedures and policy used by the Corps of Engineers in exercising its authority for wreck removal. Procedures are intended to insure that the impacts of obstructions are minimized, while recognizing certain rights of owners, operators and lessees.
§ 401.206 Procedure for payment of civil penalty for violation of the Seaway regulations. ( a ) The payment must be by money order or certified check payable to the order of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation and mailed to the Comptroller. If the payment is made in person at the offices of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, the payment may be in cash or by postal money order or check payable to the order of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.
( b ) The payment of any penalty will be acknowledged by written receipt.
( c ) If the penalty paid is determined by the Associate Administrator to have been improperly or excessively imposed, the payor will be notified and requested to submit an application for a refund which should be mailed to the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, attention of the Chief Engineer. Such application must be made by the payor within one year of the date of notification provided for in this section.
( d ) In the event the alleged violator is about to leave the jurisdiction of the United States, he or she will be required, before being allowed to depart, to post a bond in the amount and manner suitable to the Associate Administrator, from which bond any subsequent assessed or mitigated penalty may be satisfied.
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended sec. 104, Pub. L. 92-340 86 Stat. 424 and secs. 12 and 13 of sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471, and 49 CFR 1.52)
[50 FR 10964, Mar. 19, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 4341, Feb. 4, 1986]
§ 6.6 Quorum and voting. Except for matters considered through the notation voting process described in § 6.7, the Board acts by resolution upon a vote of those members who attend a meeting in accordance with § 6.4. No proxies are allowed in any vote of the members of the Board. As provided by 39 U.S.C. 205(c), any six (6) members constitute a quorum for the transaction of business by the Board, and a resolution requires a favorable vote of a majority of those members who are present, except as follows: ( a ) In the appointment or removal of the Postmaster General, and in setting the compensation and benefits of the Postmaster General and Deputy Postmaster General, 39 U.S.C. 205(c)(1) requires a favorable vote of an absolute majority of the Governors in office.
( b ) In the appointment or removal of the Deputy Postmaster General, 39 U.S.C. 205(c)(2) requires a favorable vote of an absolute majority of the Governors in office and the Postmaster General.
( c ) In the appointment, removal, or in the setting of the compensation and benefits of the Secretary, Assistant Secretary, or other necessary staff, a favorable vote of an absolute majority of the Governors in office is required.
( d ) In the determination to close a portion of a meeting or to withhold information concerning a meeting, 5 U.S.C. 552b(d)(1) requires a vote of a majority of the entire membership of the Board.
( e ) In the decision to call a meeting with less than a week's notice, 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1) requires a vote of a majority of the members of the Board. In the decision to change the subject matter of a meeting, or the determination to open or close a meeting, 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(2) requires a vote of a majority of the entire membership of the Board.
( f ) In establishing rates or classes of competitive products of both general and not of general applicability in §§ 3.9 and 3.10 of these bylaws, 39 U.S.C. 3632(a) requires the concurrence of a majority of all of the Governors then holding office.
( g ) In the appointment of the Inspector General, 39 U.S.C. 202(e) requires a favorable vote of a majority of the Governors then in office and of a majority of the Commissioners of the Postal Regulatory Commission then in office.
( h ) In removing the Inspector General for cause, 39 U.S.C. 202(e) requires the written concurrence of at least 7 Governors and 3 Commissioners of the Postal Regulatory Commission.
( i ) In adjusting the funding requested in the Postal Regulatory Commission's budget for the succeeding fiscal year, 39 U.S.C. 504(d) requires a unanimous written decision of the Governors then holding office, issued no later than 30 days after receiving the budget.
( j ) In approving a program established under 39 U.S.C. 3703 to enter into agreements with agencies of state, local or tribal governments to provide property or non-postal services to the public on such agencies' behalf, 39 U.S.C. 3703(c) requires a recorded and publicly available vote of a majority of the Governors then holding office.
[73 FR 78983, Dec. 24, 2008, as amended at 77 FR 17334, Mar. 26, 2012; 86 FR 10014, Feb. 18, 2021; 87 FR 68908, Nov. 17, 2022]
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-9   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 1
§ 175.17 Exemptions. ( a ) Canoes and kayaks 16 feet or more in length are exempted from the requirements for carriage of the additional throwable PFD required under § 175.15(b).
( b ) Racing shells, rowing sculls, racing canoes, and racing kayaks are exempted from the requirements for carriage of any PFD required under § 175.15.
( c ) Sailboards are exempted from the requirements for carriage of any PFD required under § 175.15.
( d ) Vessels of the United States used by foreign competitors while practicing for or racing in competition are exempted from the carriage of any PFD required under § 175.15, provided the vessel carries one of the sponsoring foreign country's acceptable flotation devices for each foreign competitor onboard.
[USCG-2013-0263, 79 FR 56499, Sept. 22, 2014]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5008 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5008

To direct the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration to 
         issue standards for the use of motorized skate boards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration to 
         issue standards for the use of motorized skate boards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MOTORIZED SKATE BOARDS.

    The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration to issue 
appropriate standards for the use of skate boards with handle bars, 
small front wheels, and a lawn mower engine to power it to assure the 
safety of the operator and persons who come in contact with the boards 
when motorized.
                                 <all>
```