alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Sutton, Lisa

From: Steckel, Andrew

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:52 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa

Cc: McKaughan, Colleen

Subject: FW: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction SIP Call

Attachments: SSM SIP_2060-AR68_Final_PreambleRule.pdf; SSM SIP final rule_Fact Sheet.pdf; McCabe

letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

Ahh, sorry about my confusion. Colleen just sent you our notice to Arizona. Here’s our notice to California.

‐ Andy

From: Steckel, Andrew

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 1:11 PM

To: 'glens@co.kern.ca.us'; 'bradpoiriez@co.imperial.ca.us'; Reyes Romero; Sheraz Gill (Sheraz.Gill@valleyair.org); Errol

Villegas; Sylvia Vanderspek (svanders@arb.ca.gov); 'Sutkus, Carol@ARB'

Cc: Jordan, Deborah; Drake, Kerry; Zimpfer, Amy; Smith, Noah; LEVIN, NANCY; Vineyard, Christine; Lakin, Matt; Adams,

Elizabeth

Subject: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction SIP Call



### Dear Colleagues,

This is a follow-up to my phone calls this afternoon to let you know that EPA’s Administrator signed

a final action today to ensure states have in plac e air pollution rules that apply to sources at all

times, including when sources operat e during periods of startup, s hutdown or malfunction (SSM).

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians

concerning the treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM periods,

specifically how those emissions are treated in state im plementation plan (SIP) provisions that the

EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action, EPA has revised and clarified its policy

concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.

EPA is calling for 36 states, including East Kern , Imperial and San Joaquin in California, to make

changes to their SIPs to protec t public health and ensure consiste ncy with the Clean Air Act. SIP

revisions are due to EPA by November 22, 2016.

As part of our notification about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter from EPA’s

Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe, plus a pre-publication version

of the notice and the Fact Sheet. We have also posted a pre-publication version of the action on

our website at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ur banair/sipstatus/emissions.html

.

If you or your staff have questions, feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4115,

steckel.andrew@epa.gov

.

- Andy
#### § 80.1152 Crescent City Harbor, CA.

A line drawn from Crescent City Entrance Light to the southeasternmost extremity of Whaler Island.

[CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7788, Mar. 6, 1986. Redesignated by CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4874

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for eligibility

for coverage of home health services under the Medicare Program on

the basis of a need for occupational therapy

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 2000

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for eligibility for coverage of home health services under

the Medicare Program on the basis of a need for occupational therapy

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Occupational

5 Therapy Coverage Eligibility Act of 2000’’.
2

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR HOME HEALTH SERVICES ON THE

2 BASIS OF A NEED FOR OCCUPATIONAL THER3 APY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 1814(a)(2)(C) and

5 1835(a)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

6 1395f(a)(2)(C) and 1395n(a)(2)(A)) are each amended by

7 striking ‘‘or speech therapy’’ and all that follows through

8 ‘‘need occupational therapy’’ and inserting ‘‘, occupa9 tional, or speech therapy’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply to home health services provided

12 on or after the earlier of—

13 (1) October 1, 2000; or

14 (2) the date the prospective payment system es15 tablished by section 1895(b) of the Social Security

16 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395fff(b)) is implemented.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-305-000]

Take notice that on June 1, 2000, Mississippi River Transmission Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed below to be effective July 1, 2000.

Second Revised Sheet No. 12, 

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 71, 

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 72, 

Sixth revised Sheet No. 73, 

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 74, 

Third Revised Sheet No. 126, 

Third Revised Sheet No. 164, 

First Revised Sheet No. 226A, 

Original Sheet No. 226B, 

Pro-Forma Sheet No. 10, 

Pro-Forma Sheet No. 10A

MRT states that the purpose of this filing is to enable MRT and its Transportation Customers, upon FERC authorization, the opportunity to negotiate a rate for transportation service that varies from the current Tariff rate. MRT also states that all customers under the Tariff would continue to have recourse to service at the traditional cost-based rate available under the Tariff for that service.

MRT states that a copy of this filing is being mailed to each of MRT's customers and to the state commissions of Arkansas, Illinois and Missouri.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rimbs.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14566  Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
November

Celebrate Friendship!

Share stories of cross-border friendships from Peace Corps 

Volunteers around the world, make new friends, and lend a 

helping hand

World Kindness Week

Check out:

o "I Had a Hero" and "Sharing in Africa"-Firsthand accounts of kindness crossing 

boundaries 

o Building Bridges-WWS textbook that promotes cross-cultural understanding
Honorable George H. Sheppard 

Comptroller of Public Accounts 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-5204 

Re: Duty of Comptroller of' Public 

Accounts to issue certificate 

of payment of inheritance taxes 

paid to local tax collector 

but not remitted to Comptroller, 

and related questions. 

In your letter of -April 9, 1943, you enclosed 

photostatic copy of the original receipt of the Tax Collector 

of Bexar County, dated December 1,,1925, receipting 

of tiO8.00 inheritance taxes. You stated that only P 

of'this amount was ever received by you. 

?$~~~ 

Since you are requested to execute a certificate that all such taxes were 

paid, you desire the opinion of this department as to the 

proper reply to make to this request. 

Article 7132 provides: 

"All taxes received under this law by any 

executor,administrator or trustee, shall be paid by 

him to the tax collector of the county whose county 

court has jurisdiction of the estate of the decedent. 

Upon such payment, the collector shall make duplicate receipts thereof and shall deliver one to the 

party making payment, the other he shall send to the 

amount thereof and shall countersign and affix his 

seal to such receipt and transmit-same to the party 

making payment. Acts 1923, 2nd C. S,, p. 63." 

Apparently these taxes were properly paid to 

the Tax Collector of Bexar County, and he issued his official 

receipt therefor. However, the photostatic copy of the receipt handed us.does not appear to have been countersigned 
Honorable George H. Sheppard -- Page 2 O-5204 

by the duly elected, qualified and acting Comptroller 

of Public Accounts. 

Tax receipts are admissible to prove payment 

of taxes. Deen v0 Wills, 21 Texas 642. But if the taxes 

are not actually paid, the taxing authority may recover the 

same even though tax reqipts are made out snd’delivered. 

Graves v. Bullen, 115 5. W. 1177, City of Georgetown v. Jones, 

73 5. w. 22. 

‘With the tax receipt now in the possession of 

the t axp~?yer, we are of the opinion that he can successfully 

resist any suit to collect these taxes, unless the taxing 

authority can produce evidence that such taxes were not actually 

paid. But we are unable to find any statute making it your 

dutv to issue certificates of the payment of taxes not actually 

received by you. It is true that the taxpayer paid the inheritance taxes in question to the proper official, but he did 

not follow the statute and receive a receipt countersigned by 

the then Comptroller. The requested certificate is for the 

convenience of the taxpayer, but we are of the cpinicn that 

you are under no legal duty to issue such certificate. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

BY Thos. B. Duggan, Jr. 

Assistant 

TBD/pw--pam 

APPROVED APR 28 1943 

GERALD C. MANN 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE 

BY BWB, CHAIRMAN
Exhibit 31.1  Certification Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  I, Thomas D. Ingolia, Chief Executive Officer of Health Enhancement Products, Inc. (the Company), certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.     Date: April 13, 2007 /s/ Thomas D. Ingolia Thomas D. Ingolia Chief Executive Officer
§ 83.06 Safe speed (Rule 6). Every vessel shall at all times proceed at a safe speed so that she can take proper and effective action to avoid collision and be stopped within a distance appropriate to the prevailing circumstances and conditions. In determining a safe speed the following factors shall be among those taken into account: ( a ) By all vessels: ( i ) The state of visibility;
( ii ) The traffic density including concentration of fishing vessels or any other vessels;
( iii ) The maneuverability of the vessel with special reference to stopping distance and turning ability in the prevailing conditions;
( iv ) At night, the presence of background light such as from shore lights or from back scatter of her own lights;
( v ) The state of wind, sea, and current, and the proximity of navigational hazards;
( vi ) The draft in relation to the available depth of water.
( b ) Additionally, by vessels with operational radar: ( i ) The characteristics, efficiency and limitations of the radar equipment;
( ii ) Any constraints imposed by the radar range scale in use;
( iii ) The effect on radar detection of the sea state, weather, and other sources of interference;
( iv ) The possibility that small vessels, ice and other floating objects may not be detected by radar at an adequate range;
( v ) The number, location, and movement of vessels detected by radar;
( vi ) The more exact assessment of the visibility that may be possible when radar is used to determine the range of vessels or other objects in the vicinity.
[USCG-2012-0102, 79 FR 37912, July 2, 2014, as amended by USCG-2012-0102, 79 FR 68621, Nov. 18, 2014]
SERVED: MARCH 31, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF MOUNTAIN AIR CARGO, INC.

DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0111 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013EA680043) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL 

### ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

### ONE COPY Mark A. Dombroff, Respondent's Counsel McKennaLong & Alderidge 1676IJ:ntemational Drive PH McLean, VA 22102 TEL: 703-336-8700 FAX: NOT PROVIDED Zachery M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal AviationAdministration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL:' 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0111 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
Spreading Wings S800 EVO Product Release Notes

©2013 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved.

Date 

Release Status 

S800 EVO User Manual Version 

: 2013.07.02 

: Evaluation 

: 1.00 

 

Functions and Features: 

 Highly integrated designs& Reinforced mechanical structures

 Stabilized dynamical system

 High-efficiency power reserve

 Portability designs of retractable landing gear, foldable propellers and collapsible GPS 

Mount

 Easy and prompt assembly& electrical connections units

 ESC integrated with built-in LED and internal radiator

 High performance vibration dampers

 High performance brushless motor
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Benjamin A. Horowitz, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (i) the Annual Reportof Opsware Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31,2006 to which this certification is attached (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and (ii) information contained in the Report fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of OpswareInc.

Date: April 14,2006
| By:    |   | /s/ Benjamin A. Horowitz |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
| Name:  |   | Benjamin A. Horowitz     |
| Title: |   | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

This Certification which accompanies the Report is notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of Opsware Inc. under the SecuritiesAct of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before orafter the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.

----
#### § 6.10-7 Identification credentials.

The identification credential to be issued by the Commandant shall be known as the Coast Guard Port Security Card, and the form of such credential, and the conditions and the manner of its issuance shall be as prescribed by the Commandant after consultation with the Secretary of Labor. The Commandant shall not issue a Coast Guard Port Security Card unless the Commandant is satisfied that the character and habits of life of the applicant therefor are such as to authorize the belief that the presence of such individual on board a vessel or within a waterfront facility would not be inimical to the security of the United States. The Commandant shall revoke and require the surrender of a Coast Guard Port Security Card when the Commandant is no longer satisfied that the holder is entitled thereto. The Commandant may recognize for the same purpose such other credentials as the Commandant may designate in lieu of the Coast Guard Port Security Card.

[E.O. 14116, 89 FR 13972, Feb. 26, 2024]
#### CHARLES WENTZLER, Respondent, *v.*SOLOMON ALDRICH, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee. The General Term was of the opinion that the evidence in this case was sufficient to sustain the findings of the referee, and affirmed the judgment.

*Edward K. Clark,*for the appellant.

*R. H. Root,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                 EXHIBIT 12.2

                          AMERICAN EXPRESS CORPORATION
          COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 Nine Months
                                    Ended
                             September 30, 2003            Years Ended December 31,
                             ------------------   ------------------------------------------
                                 (Unaudited)       2002     2001     2000     1999     1998
                             ------------------   ------------------------------------------
<S>                                <C>            <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings:
Pretax income from
   continuing operations           $3,157         $3,727   $1,596   $3,908   $3,438   $2,925
Interest expense                    1,232          1,846    2,888    2,952    2,178    2,224
Other adjustments                     117            174      175      163      151      124
                                   ------         ------------------------------------------
Total earnings (a)                 $4,506         $5,747   $4,659   $7,023   $5,767   $5,273
                                   ======         ==========================================

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                $1,232         $1,846   $2,888   $2,952   $2,178   $2,224
   Other adjustments                  104            151      170      165      152      129
                                   ------         ------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges (b)            $1,336         $1,997   $3,058   $3,117   $2,330   $2,353
                                   ======         ==========================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed
   charges (a/b)                     3.37           2.88     1.52     2.25     2.48     2.24
</TABLE>

Included in interest expense in the above computation is interest expense
related to the international banking operations of American Express Company
("American Express") and Travel Related Services' cardmember lending activities,
which is netted against interest and dividends and cardmember lending net
finance charge revenue, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

For purposes of the "earnings" computation, other adjustments include adding the
amortization of capitalized interest, the net loss of affiliates accounted for
at equity whose debt is not guaranteed by American Express, the minority
interest in the earnings of majority-owned subsidiaries with fixed charges, and
the interest component of rental expense and subtracting undistributed net
income of affiliates accounted for at equity.

For purposes of the "fixed charges" computation, other adjustments include
capitalized interest costs and the interest component of rental expense.