alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 652 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 652

    Designating the week beginning September 8, 2008, as ``National 
                        Assisted Living Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2008

     Mr. Crapo (for himself and Mr. Thune) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

           September 22 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Designating the week beginning September 8, 2008, as ``National 
                        Assisted Living Week''.

Whereas the number of elderly and disabled citizens of the United States is 
        increasing dramatically;
Whereas assisted living is a long-term care service that fosters choice, 
        dignity, independence, and autonomy in the elderly and disabled across 
        the United States;
Whereas the National Center for Assisted Living created National Assisted Living 
        Week;
Whereas the theme of National Assisted Living Week 2008 is ``Filling Life with 
        Love''; and
Whereas this theme highlights the privilege, value, and responsibility of 
        passing the legacies of the lives of the elderly and disabled of the 
        United States down through the generations that care for and love them: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning September 8, 2008, as 
        ``National Assisted Living Week''; and
            (2) urges all people of the United States--
                    (A) to visit friends and loved ones who reside at 
                assisted living facilities; and
                    (B) to learn more about assisted living services, 
                including how assisted living services benefit 
                communities in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### STEPHEN KROM, Respondent, *v.*JOHN J. LEVY, Appellant.

Motion for a reargument, and for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. The court was of opinion that the case was properly decided on the former argument,* and that no principle was involved which the public interests required should be examined by the Court of Appeals.

N. *B. Hoxsie,*for the appellant.

*Coles Morris,*for the respondent.

*

 See 1 Hun, 171.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.

Present- —Davis, P. J., Brady and Daniels, JJ.

Both applications denied, with ten dollars costs.
From: Brian Pollock brian@fairlawattorney.com

Subject: Collado vs. 450 North River Drive - Notice, Consent, and Reminder Forms

Date: April 21, 2023 at 5:58 PM

To: Velazquez, Reynaldo (Miami) Rey.Velazquez@jacksonlewis.com, Allan S. Reiss, Esq. asr@levinelawfirm.com,

Sarangoulis, Roman (Miami) Roman.Sarangoulis@jacksonlewis.com

Cc: Ashley Hahn ashley@fairlawattorney.com, Schultz, Adam (Miami) Adam.Schultz@jacksonlewis.com,

Billingsby, Rebecca J. (Miami) Rebecca.Billingsby@jacksonlewis.com, Maria I. Arce mia@levinelawfirm.com

Good Evening Rey, Allan, Roman, and Adam,

I referenced in the Second Renewed MCC that I would be providing the Notice, Consent, and Reminder Notices to you in Word

format. I have attached them to this email.

Reminder Notice 

Form (...).docx

16 KB

Notice Form 

(Propo...h.docx

18 KB

Consent to Join 

(For O...h.docx

30 KB

Best regards,

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

FairLaw Firm

Dir: 305.230.4822

Ofc: 305.230.4884

Fax: 305.230.4844

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

brian@fairlawattorney.com

www.fairlawattorney.com

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 144-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2023 Page 1 of 2
From: Velazquez, Reynaldo (Miami) Rey.Velazquez@jacksonlewis.com

Subject: RE: Collado vs. 450 North River Drive - Notice, Consent, and Reminder Forms

Date: April 25, 2023 at 10:44 AM

To: Brian Pollock brian@fairlawattorney.com, Allan S. Reiss, Esq. asr@levinelawfirm.com, Sarangoulis, Roman (Miami)

Roman.Sarangoulis@jacksonlewis.com

Cc: Ashley Hahn ashley@fairlawattorney.com, Schultz, Adam (Miami) Adam.Schultz@jacksonlewis.com,

Billingsby, Rebecca J. (Miami) Rebecca.Billingsby@jacksonlewis.com, Maria I. Arce mia@levinelawfirm.com

Thanks Brian.

Reynaldo Velazquez

Attorney at Law

Jackson Lewis P.C.

One Biscayne Tower Two South Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 3500

Miami, FL 33131

Direct: (305) 577-7621 | Main: (305) 577-7600

Rey.Velazquez@jacksonlewis.com | www.jacksonlewis.com

From: Brian Pollock <brian@fairlawattorney.com> 

Sent: Friday, April 21, 2023 5:59 PM

To: Velazquez, Reynaldo (Miami) <Rey.Velazquez@jacksonlewis.com>; Allan S. Reiss, Esq. <asr@levinelawfirm.com>; Sarangoulis, Roman (Miami)

<Roman.Sarangoulis@jacksonlewis.com>

Cc: Ashley Hahn <ashley@fairlawattorney.com>; Schultz, Adam (Miami) <Adam.Schultz@jacksonlewis.com>; Billingsby, Rebecca J. (Miami)

<Rebecca.Billingsby@jacksonlewis.com>; Maria I. Arce <mia@levinelawfirm.com>

Subject: Collado vs. 450 North River Drive - Notice, Consent, and Reminder Forms

Good Evening Rey, Allan, Roman, and Adam,

I referenced in the Second Renewed MCC that I would be providing the Notice, Consent, and Reminder Notices to you in Word format. I have attached them to this email.

Best regards,

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

FairLaw Firm

Dir: 305.230.4822

Ofc: 305.230.4884

Fax: 305.230.4844

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

brian@fairlawattorney.com <mailto:brian@fairlawttorney.com>

http://www.fairlawattorney.com <http://www.fairlawattorney.com>

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 144-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/11/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 62.43 Numbers and letters. ( a ) All solid red and solid green aids are numbered, with red aids bearing even numbers and green aids bearing odd numbers. The numbers for each increase in the Conventional Direction of Buoyage. Numbers are kept in approximately sequence on both sides of the channel by omitting numbers where necessary.
( b ) Only sidemarks are numbered. However, aids other than those mentioned above may be lettered to assist in their identification, or to indicate their purpose. Sidemarks may carry letters in addition to numbers to identify the first aid to navigation in a waterway, or when new aids to navigation are added to channels with previously completed numerical sequences. Letters on sidemarks will follow alphabetical order from seaward and proceeding toward the Conventional Direction of Buoyage and will be added to numbers as suffixes.
( c ) Aids to navigation may be fitted with light-reflecting material to increase their visibility in darkness. The colors of this material may convey the same significance as the aid except that letters and numbers may be white.
( d ) Exceptions to the provisions of this section will be found on the Western Rivers System. See § 62.51.
( e ) The guidelines for the display of numbers and letters on aids to navigation are identical for both Region A and Region B; red aids to navigation display even numbers, and green aids display odd numbers.
[CGD 86-031, 52 FR 42640, Nov. 6, 1987, as amended by CGD 88-018, 54 FR 48608, Nov. 24, 1989]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 051000A]


Marine Mammals; Permit No. 1004 (P595)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service, (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Scientific research permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a request for amendment of 
scientific research no. 1004 submitted by the Whale Conservation 
Institute/Ocean Alliance, 191 Weston Road, Lincoln, MA 01773, has been 
granted.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment, in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289); and
    Director, Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, 
MA 01930-2298 (508/281-9250).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Johnson, 301/713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: February 11, 2000, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (65 FR 6997) that an amendment of permit no. 1004, 
issued June 21, 1996 (61 FR 33906) had been requested by the above-
named organization. The requested amendment has been granted under the 
authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the Regulations Governing the Taking and 
Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), the Endangered Species 
Act of 1973 as amended (ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the 
regulations governing endangered and threatened species (50 CFR parts 
222-226).
    Permit No. 1004 has been amended to: (1) extend the expiration date 
of the permit to December 31, 2000; (2) increase the number of imported 
tissue samples from all species, except southern right whale (Eubalaena 
australis); and (3) increase locations from which samples may be 
imported.
    Issuance of this amendment as required by the ESA of 1973 was based 
on a finding that the permit: (1) was applied for in good faith; (2) 
will not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is 
the subject of this permit; and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in Section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: June 5, 2000.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 00-14674 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXHIBIT
32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Christopher S. Forno, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                          |                         
|------------------------- | ------------------------
|/s/
 Christopher S. Forno
|                         
|Name:                     | Christopher
 S. Forno   
|Title:                    | Chief
 Executive Officer
|Date:                     | November 4,
 2008       

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN INTEGCOM (PRESENTLY DVS INC.) AND LOUIS MASSAD
DATED DECEMBER 22, 1999 IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:

     1)   Term of Employment: Termination of Employment Agreement extended to
          December 31, 2005.

     2)   Scope of Employment, para.3 shall be deleted in its entirety and
          replaced by: Hours of Employment:
          - September 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003; 2 days per week -
          January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2005 ; 1 day per week - Employee
          will work additional day/s per week as requested by management.

     3)   Compensation: Para.4 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as
          follows:
          - September 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003 shall be $3,000 per week -
          January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005 shall be $1,500 per week -
          Additional days at $1,500 per day.

All other Terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain the same.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment. DVS Inc.


BY: Irv Witcosky                                      DATE 8 - 11 - 03
    ---------------------------------                      -----------
    Irv Witcosky, President


BY: Louis Massad                                      DATE 8 - 11 - 03
    ---------------------------------                      -----------
    Louis Massad, Employee
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

September 19, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-21243

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CONRADO PENA-ORDONEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CR-150-ALL

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Conrado Pena-Ordonez (Pena) appeals his conviction and the 60-

month prison sentence he received upon his plea of guilty to

a charge of having been present in the United States after

deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We AFFIRM.

Pena c ontends that the district court reversibly erred

in sentencing him under the guidelines, by departing upward in

determining his term of imprisonment. The district court did notNo. 02-21243

-2-

reversibly err, however, because the court gave acceptable reasons

for departing and the extent of the departure is reasonable.

United States v. Hefferon

, 314 F.3d 211, 227 (5th Cir. 2002).

Furthermore, it is clear that Pena’s sentence

would have been no different if the district court had disregarded

the fact that he had lied to law enforcement authorities in

connection with his prior offenses. S ee Williams v. United States

,

503 U.S. 193, 204 (1992).

Pena also contends that the felony conviction that resulted in

his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element

of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment and

proved to a j ury beyond a reasonable doubt. He asserts that 8

U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional on their face and

as applied in his case. He acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v.

United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the

issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi

v. New Jersey

, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Pena’s contention lacks merit

because Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. S ee Apprendi

,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit

, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th

Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99(b)

Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC

Statement of Collection Account Balances as of

December 31, 2008

The
balances in the sub-accounts on deposit with the trustee as of the above date were:



|                                  |  |               |               |               |   |              
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | - | -------------
|                                  |  | Series 2003-1 |               | Series 2004-1
|General Sub-Account               |  | $             | 25,063,412.48 |               | $ | 14,232,955.03
|Capital Sub-Account               |  | $             | 2,507,491.30  |               | $ | 3,949,474.11 
|Overcollateralization Sub-Account |  | $             | 1,044,100.76  |               | $ | 476,412.03   
|Reserve Sub-Account               |  | $             | 1,268,644.55  |               | $ | 72.16        

REP Deposit Account* $8,610,395.61



|* | REP deposits are held in one account with a sub-ledger outlining the respective amount of each REPs deposit attributable to each series of bonds.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 80.1138 Santa Cruz Harbor, CA.

A line drawn from the seaward extremity of the Santa Cruz Harbor East Breakwater to Santa Cruz Harbor West Breakwater Light; thence to Santa Cruz Light.

[CGD 84-091, 51 FR 21748, June 16, 1986. Redesignated by CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
Exhibit 32(b)
                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama
Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, we, the undersigned, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and
belief, that:

(1)           such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alabama Power Company for
              the quarter ended March 31, 2004, which this statement
              accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
              Alabama Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fairly
              presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
              results of operations of Alabama Power Company.



                              /s/Charles D. McCrary
                               Charles D. McCrary
                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                           /s/William B. Hutchins, III
                            William B. Hutchins, III
                            Executive Vice President,
                      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  May 6, 2004
EXHIBIT


31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, George R. Lefevre, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010.





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the quarterly report; and





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in the quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the quarterly report based on such evaluation; and





c) disclosed in the quarterly report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.








/s/ George Lefevre




Dated:  May 21, 2010                                                                           By:


George R. Lefevre, Chief Financial Officer