alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                        FOURTH OPTION AMENDING AGREEMENT



               THIS  AGREEMENT  dated  for  reference  June  15,  2002
BETWEEN:

MARKATECH INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, a body duly incorporated under the laws of the
Province  of  British  Columbia,  Canada  and  having an office at 745 West 42nd
Avenue,  Vancouver,  B.C.,  V5Z  2N8  ("Markatech").

OF  THE  FIRST  PART

AND:

SEDONA  SOFTWARE  SOLUTIONS  INC., a body corporate, duly incorporated under the
laws  of  the  State of Nevada and having an office at 503 - 1755 Robson Street,
Vancouver,  B.C.,  V6G  3B7  ("Sedona").

OF  THE  SECOND  PART



WHEREAS:

A.     Markatech  is  the  developer and owner of a 100% interest in the Autonet
Parking  Ticket  Violation  Management  System  ("Autonet").

B.     Markatech  has  agreed to grant to Sedona the right, privilege and option
to  conduct  a  due  diligence  review  of  Autonet.

C.     Markatech  has  agreed  to grant to Sedona a time extension of the right,
privilege  and  option  to  conduct  a  due  diligence  review  of  Autonet

NOW  THEREFORE  in  consideration  of  ten  dollars  ($10.00) and other good and
valuable  consideration  (the  receipt  and  sufficiency  of  which  are  hereby
acknowledged), the parties have agreed that the Option Agreement dated April 30,
2000,  as  amended pursuant to the Option Amending Agreement dated September 15,
2001, the Second Option Amending Agreement dated December 5, 2001, and the Third
Option  Amending  Agreement  dated  March 15, 2002 is hereby amended as follows:

The  following  date  is  deleted:
Para.  4.2,  line2,  delete:  "July  1,  2002".

The  following  date  is  added:
Para  4.2,  line2  add:  "July  1,  2003".


<PAGE>


ENTIRE  AGREEMENT:

               This Agreement together with the Option Agreement dated April 30,
2000 , the Option Amending Agreement dated September 15, 2001, the Second Option
Amending  Agreement  dated  December  5,  2001  ,  and the Third Option Amending
Agreement  dated March 15, 2002 constitutes the entire agreement to date between
the  parties  hereto  and  supersedes  every  previous agreement, communication,
expectation,  negotiation,  representation  or  understanding,  whether  oral or
written,  express  or  implied, statutory or otherwise, between the parties with
respect  to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed
in  counterpart.

 IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF  this  Agreement  has been executed as of the day and year
first  above  written

MARKATECH  INDUSTRIES  CORPORATION


per /s/ Les Scott
    _______________________________
    Les Scott, director



SEDONA  SOFTWARE  SOLUTIONS  INC.


Per /s/ J.E. Cooper
    _______________________________
    J.E. Cooper, director
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-80128-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

GEORGE MURILLO,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

THIRD NOTICE OF FILING

Defendant, George Murillo, through undersigned counsel, files the attached 

letter for the Court's consideration at the time of his sentencing. 

Respectfully submitted,

MICHAEL CARUSO

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

s/ Kristy Militello 

Kristy Militello

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Attorney for the Defendant

Florida Bar No. 0056366

250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

(561) 833-6288 Telephone 

Kristy_Militello@fd.org

Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/16/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 16, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record via transmission of Notices 

of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for 

those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of 

Electronic Filing.

s/ Kristy Militello 

Kristy Militello

Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/16/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 334.180 Patuxent River, Md.; restricted areas, U.S. Naval Air Test Center, Patuxent River, Md. ( a ) Except in the gut off the tip of Point Patience, no person in the water and no craft shall approach closer than 75 yards to the beaches, shoreline, or piers of the area formerly occupied by the U.S. Naval Mine Warfare Test Station, or of U.S. Naval Air Station property. A person in the water or a civilian craft shall not approach rafts, barges, or platforms closer than 100 yards.
( b ) Diving tenders will exhibit a square red flag with white X when underwater diving takes place from naval small craft. At such times, persons in the water and civilian craft shall stay at least 200 yards clear of these vessels and the civilian craft shall proceed at a speed not greater than five knots when within 1,000 yards thereof.
( c ) On occasions, seaplane landings and takeoffs will be practiced in the seadrome area north of the U.S. Naval Air Station, Patuxent River. This area includes those waters of the Patuxent River between Town Point and Hog Point shoreward of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the shore just west of Lewis Creek, bearing 161°30′ true, 2,000 yards from Patuxent River Light 8; thence to a point bearing 130° true, 1,850 yards from Patuxent River Light 8; thence to a point bearing 247°30′ true, 3,650 yards from Drum Point Light 2; thence to point bearing 235° true, 2,060 yards from Drum Point Light 2; thence to a point bearing 129° true, 700 yards from Drum Point Light 2; thence to a point bearing 137° true, 1,060 yards from Drum Point Light 2; and thence to a point on the shore west of Harper Creek entrance, bearing 158°30′ true, 1,900 yards from Drum Point Light 2.
( d ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Md., and such agencies as he may designate.
[30 FR 4198, Mar. 31, 1965, as amended at 48 FR 54598, Dec. 6, 1983. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3451-3452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Report No. 2382


Petition for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceeding

January 14, 2000.
    Petition for Reconsideration and Clarification has been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and 
published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of this 
document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-A257, 445 12th 
Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's 
copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to this petition 
must be filed by February 7, 2000. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the 
Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be 
filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.

[[Page 3452]]

    Subject: Amendment of the Amateur Service Rules to Provide for 
Greater Use of Spread Spectrum Communications Technologies (WT Docket 
No. 97-12, RM-8737).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-1463 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14587]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Networking Infrastructure 
Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Advanced Networking 
Infrastructure Research #1207).
    Date & Time: June 26, 2000; 8:00 AM-6:00 PM.
    Place: Room 1150, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Persons: Darleen Fisher and Karen Sollins, Division of 
Advanced Networking Infrastructure Research, Room 1175, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1950.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Networking Research Program as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: June 5, 2000.
Karen J. York,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-14587 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-200-054]

      ( print page 36685)    
Take notice that on May 31, 2000, Reliant Energy Gas Transmission Company (REGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective June 1, 2000:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 8F

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 8G

REGT states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the expiration of an existing negotiated rate contract and the addition of a new negotiated rate contract.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's rules and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14555  Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22951-CIV-SMITH

ATLANTIC RECORDING 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

This cause is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Notice of Bankruptcy Court Order 

Staying Action [DE 25]. The Bankruptcy Court Order [DE 25-1] stays this action in its entirety

until March 31, 2023. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED THAT:

1. The case is STAYED.

2. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 

3. By April 1, 2023, the parties shall notify the Court whether the Bankruptcy Court’s 

stay has been extended or move the Court to lift the stay and reopen this case. 

4. The Clerk is directed to administratively CLOSE this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida this 6th day of January, 2023.

____________________________________

RODNEY SMITH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-22951-RS Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/09/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4959 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4959

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the depreciation 
           of property used in the generation of electricity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2000

Mr. Thomas (for himself, Mr. Jefferson, and Mr. English) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the depreciation 
           of property used in the generation of electricity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPRECIATION OF PROPERTY USED IN THE GENERATION OF 
              ELECTRICITY.

    (a) Depreciation of Property Used in the Generation of 
Electricity.--
            (1) In general.--Subparagraph (C) of section 168(e)(3) of 
        the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 7-year property) 
        is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (i), by 
        redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii), and by inserting 
        after clause (i) the following new clause:
                            ``(ii) any property used in the generation 
                        of electricity, and''.
            (2) 10-year class life.--The table contained in section 
        168(g)(3)(B) of such Code is amended by inserting below the 
        item relating to subparagraph (C)(i) the following new item:

                ``(C)(ii)......................................   10''.
    (b) Definition of Property Used in the Generation of Electricity.--
Subsection (i) of section 168 of such Code is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
            ``(15) Property used in the generation of electricity.--The 
        term `property used in the generation of electricity' means 
        property used in nuclear power production of electricity for 
        sale, property used in hydraulic power production of 
        electricity for sale, property used in steam power production 
        of electricity for sale, and property used in combustion 
        turbine production of electricity for sale.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 80.810 Cape San Blas, FL to Perdido Bay, FL. ( a ) A line drawn from St. Joseph Bay Entrance Range A Rear Light through St. Joseph Bay Entrance Range B Front Light to St. Joseph Point.
( b ) A line drawn across the mouth of Salt Creek as an extension of the general trend of the shoreline to continue across the inlet to St. Andrews sound in the middle of Crooked Island.
( c ) A line drawn between the seaward end of the St. Andrews Bay Entrance Jetties.
( d ) A line drawn between the seaward end of the Choctawatchee Bay Entrance Jetties.
( e ) An east-west line drawn from Fort McRee Leading Light across the Pensacola Bay Entrance along latitude 30°19.5′ N.
( f ) A line drawn between the seaward end of the Perdido Pass Jetties.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, as amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7787, Mar. 6, 1986; USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30878, June 28, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          1
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,946
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,142
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,094,406
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,100,602)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,946
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,197)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,197)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
GAO/AIMD-00-242R Non Commissioned Officers Association of the U.S.A., Inc.

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

Accounting and Information

Management Division

B-285433

June 30, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the Non Commissioned Officers Association of the United States of

America, Incorporated, for 1997 and 1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the Non

Commissioned Officers Association of the United States of America, Incorporated, a federally

chartered corporation, for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1998. The corporation is

an association of active, reserve, national guard, and retired non commissioned and petty

officers of the Armed Forces of the United States of America.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the corporation’s

income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditor’s report and the corporation’s financial statements to the Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with the

financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we reviewed the

corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes, performed certain analytical

procedures related to information presented in the financial statements, reviewed the

auditor’s report, and made inquiries to corporation officials or the auditor as we deemed

necessary. We did not review the auditor’s working papers. Our review disclosed no

reportable instances of noncompliance.
B-285433

Page 2 GAO/AIMD-00-242R Non Commissioned Officers Association of the U.S.A., Inc.

The corporation reported that its liabilities exceeded its assets by approximately $608,000

and $541,000 at the end of 1997 and 1998, respectively. The audit report included the

auditor’s opinion that the financial statements of the corporation were presented fairly, in all

material respects, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We are

returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

David L. Clark

Director, Audit Oversight and Liaison

Enclosure

(911981)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BOCHETTO & LENTZ, P.C. AND 

THOMAS J. KARL,

Petitioners

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

DELAWARE COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 95 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6

th day of September, 2019, the Petitioners’ Application for Leave 

to File Original Process is GRANTED. The Petitioners’ Emergency King’s Bench Petition 

for a Stay and Writ of Prohibition is DENIED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130484 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. BONNIE AMON, Successor Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Ann Marie Justices Samodell, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 130484 COA: 260252 Oakland CC: 2002-046057-NH BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL, and ROBERT F. SCHIRMER, D.O., Defendants-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees.

___________________ ________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2005 judgment of the Court of App eals is considered and, it app earing to this Court that the
case of Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879) is pending on appeal
before this Court and that th e decision in that case may res olve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that th e application be held in ABEYANCE pending the d ecision in that case.

l0410 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 13, 2007

Clerk
July 10,2014
Federal Aviation Administration Wilbur Wright Building 800 Independence Avenue Southwest Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

# CAS

oertlfledAVfatlon.cam 

# RECEIVED JUL 14 2014 HEARING DOCKET

Reference: Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty-FAA Case No. 2014WP9l0075
Certified Aviation Services, LLC (CAS) is inreceipt ofthe above referenced final notice. Per 14 C.F.R. Section 13.16, CAS has 15 days after the receipt ofthe reference fmal notice, to request a hearing inthis matter. Please accept this letter as CAS' request for a hearing in the matter ofthe proposed civil penalty resulting from FAA Case No. 2014WP910075. Please feel free to contact me at: Certified Aviation Services, LLC ll50 S. Vineyard Ave. Ontario, CA 91761 Attention: William Corteal Office: (909) 458-6462 e-mail: wcorteal!{ilcertifiedaviation.com

Cc J.M. Harper, FAA Office ofRegional counsel-ANM-7

Certified Aviation Services, llC 1150 S. Vineyard Ave., Ontario, CA 91761 tel**909~605-0380** www.certifiedaviation.com