alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 255.4 Accessibility to electronic and information technology. ( a ) In accordance with section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Postal Service shall ensure, absent an undue burden, that the electronic and information technology the agency procures allows— ( 1 ) Individuals with disabilities who are Postal Service employees or applicants to have access to and use of information and data that is comparable to the access to and use of information and data by Postal Service employees or applicants who are not individuals with disabilities; and
( 2 ) Individuals with disabilities who are members of the public seeking information or services from the Postal Service to have access to and use of information and data that is comparable to the access to and use of information and data by members of the public who are not individuals with disabilities.
( b ) When procurement of electronic and information technology that meets the standards published by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board would pose an undue burden, the Postal Service shall provide individuals with disabilities covered by paragraph (a) of this section with the information and data by an alternative means of access that allows the individuals to use the information and data.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), all authorities vested in the Secretary of Health and Human Services under Part D, Title III of the PHS Act, Subpart IX—Support of Graduate Medical Education Programs, as amended. This delegation excludes the authority to issue regulations and to submit reports to Congress This authority may be redelegated.

In addition, I hereby ratify any actions taken by the Administrator or other HRSA officials which involved exercise of this authority prior to the effective date of this delegation.

This delegation is effective upon date of signature. 

Dated: June 2, 2000.

Donna E. Shalala,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14802 Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-15-M
* Judge Luttig was a member of the original panel but did not participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2351 JOSEPH T. HARANZO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-05-326-7) Submitted: April 28, 2006 Decided: May 23, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, *and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Joseph T. Haranzo, Appellant Pro Se. Ishneila G. Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Joseph T. Haranzo appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Haranzo v. Virginia Dep’t of Rehabilitative Servs. , No. CA-05-326-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2005). In addition, we deny Haranzo’s request for a trial. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Joseph P. SCHMIT, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent, Great Northern Investments, Inc., Intervenor.

No. 16072.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 27, 1958.

Schermer & Gensler, Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioner.

Thomas G. Meeker, Gen. Counsel, David Ferber, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Sidney D. Goldberg, Sp. Counsel, Securities & Exchange Commission, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

John W. Windhorst, Minneapolis, Minn., George M. Schlosser and John P. Ryan, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for intervenor.

PER CURIAM.

Petition to review order of Securities & Exchange Commission dismissed with prejudice, on motion of petitioner.
#### § 3022.21 Investigator.

The Commission may appoint an investigator to examine issues raised by the complaint and responses thereto. The investigator will use appropriate due diligence under the circumstances and provide a public, written report to the Commission.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1339 Safety Zone; Coast Guard Exercise Area, Hood Canal, Washington. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a safety zone: All waters encompassed within 500 yards of any vessel that is involved in a Coast Guard training exercise while such vessel is transiting Hood Canal, WA between Foul Weather Bluff and the entrance to Dabob Bay. Vessels involved will be various sizes and can be identified as those flying the Coast Guard Ensign.
( b ) *Regulations.* In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety zone created in this rule unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or a Designated Representative. See 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart C, for additional information and requirements. Vessel operators wishing to enter the zone during the enforcement period must request permission for entry by contacting the on-scene patrol commander on VHF channel 13 or 16, or the Sector Puget Sound Joint Harbor Operations Center at (206) 217-6001.
( c ) *Definition.* Training exercises are defined as full scale exercises that are significant in nature and involve multiple units and vessels. This safety zone will not be utilized by operations and training which is conducted daily or is routine in nature.
( d ) *Enforcement period.* The safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section would be enforced by the Captain of the Port only upon notice. Notice of enforcement by the Captain of the Port will be provided 45 days prior to execution of the exercise by all appropriate means, in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7(a). Such means will include publication in the Federal Register, and may also include Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, or both.
[USCG-2012-0900, 78 FR 8029, Feb. 7, 2013]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-CR-80144-RS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

JOFF STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

DEFENDANT PHILOSSAINT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING

The Defendant, JOFF STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT, through undersigned 

counsel, moves this Court to continue the sentencing hearing currently set for 

Wednesday, April 19, 2023, and in support thereof, states the following:

1. Defendant has pled guilty or has been convicted by a jury, of conspiracy 

to commit wire fraud, two counts of conspiracy to commit money laundering, and 

one count of obtaining citizenship by fraud.

2. On March 16, 2023, counsel was appointed pursuant to the Criminal 

Justice Act (CJA) as Defendant’s new attorney to represent Defendant for purpose 

of sentencing. Counsel has met with Defendant’s prior attorney and Defendant, has 

reviewed the Presentence Investigation Report, and has spoken with the Prosecutor,

Marc Osborne.

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 255 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2023 Page 1 of 3
2

3. Based on the above conversations, it is clear this is a procedurally and 

substantively complex case. There are 33 funded loans in question. Discovery is 

voluminous. Counsel needs to determine the correct and proper objections to file 

regarding the Presentence Investigation Report. Counsel also needs to spend 

additional time becoming familiar with the case.

4. Counsel has conferred with Assistant United States Attorney, Marc 

Osborne, who agrees that a continuance is appropriate in light of the complexity of 

the case.

5. Accordingly, Defendant moves for a 60-day continuance of 

Defendant’s sentencing hearing to a date at the end of June, 2023, or thereafter. This 

will allow sufficient time to file the necessary responsive pleadings to complete the 

sentencing process.

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully moves the Court to continue the

sentencing hearing as requested herein.

 Respectfully Submitted,

 SCOTT W. SAKIN, P.A.

 CJA Counsel for Defendant Philossaint

 2883 Executive Park Drive, Suite 200

 Weston, Florida 33331-3662

 Tel. (954) 779-7879

 scott@sakinlaw.com

 By: ___/s Scott W. Sakin___________

SCOTT W. SAKIN, ESQ.

Fla. Bar No. 349089

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 255 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2023 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

DEFENDANT PHILOSSAINT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE 

SENTENCING HEARING was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court 

through the CM/ECF system and copies of same distributed to all counsel of record 

and known interested parties on this 4

th day of April, 2023.

 By: ___/s Scott W. Sakin___________

SCOTT W. SAKIN, ESQ.

Fla. Bar No. 349089

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 255 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2023 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 15
 
Exhibit 15 -- Letter Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information
 
Board of Directors
AmSouth Bancorporation
 
We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and in their related Prospectuses, of our report dated November   ,
1997 relating to the unaudited consolidated financial statements of AmSouth
Bancorporation and subsidiaries which are included in its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1997:
 
Form S-3 No. 33-55683 pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock
       Purchase Plan;
 
Form S-8 No. 33-52243 pertaining to the assumption by AmSouth Bancorporation
       of FloridaBank Stock Option Plan and FloridaBank Stock Option Plan-
       1993;
 
Form S-8 No. 33-52113 pertaining to the 1989 Long Term Incentive Compensation
       Plan;
 
Form S-8 No. 33-35218 pertaining to the 1989 Long Term Incentive Compensation
       Plan;
 
Form S-8 No. 33-37905 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Thrift Plan;
 
Form S-8 No. 33-9368 pertaining to the Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan;
 
Form S-8 No. 33-2927 (as amended) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase
       Plan;
 
Form S-8 No. 2-97464 pertaining to the Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan;
 
Form S-3 No. 33-35280 pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment and Common Stock
       Purchase Plan;
 
Form S-8 No. 33-19016 pertaining to the Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan;
 
Form S-8 No. 33-58777 pertaining to the Director Restricted Stock Plan;
 
Form S-8 No. 333-02099 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Thrift Plan;
 
Form S-3 No. 333-06641 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation 7 1/2%
       Convertible Subordinated Debentures;
 
Form S-8 No. 333-05631 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation 1996 Long Term
       Incentive Compensation Plan; and
 
Form S-8 No. 333-27107 pertaining to the AmSouth Bancorporation Employee Stock
       Purchase Plan.
 
Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our reports are not a
part of the registration statements prepared or certified by accountants
within the meaning of Sections 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
November 14, 1997
# AGENCY:

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

 Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has instructed its staff to explore potential areas where regulations can be made more risk-informed and performance based. One area that the staff finds of interest involves the ability of licensee's to risk-monitor and risk-prioritize their corrective action programs. This noticed meeting is to discuss the computerized program developed by Bill Vesely and implemented by at least one utility, (PP&L—Susquehanna) to risk-inform their corrective action program. The meeting will focus on the program's use and application, associated results and findings, and potential for application in this and other areas of the regulatory process. 

*Meeting Information:*                        The staff intends to conduct a meeting to provide for an exchange of information related to the licensee's corrective action programs. Persons other than NRC staff and NRC contractors interested in making a presentation at the meeting should notify John H. Flack, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, MS: T10-E46, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. 20555-0001, (301) 415-5739, email: jhf@nrc.gov.                    

*Date:*                         February 1, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         2:00pm-4:00pm.                     

*Location:*                         Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Room T-10A1, Rockville, Maryland 20852.                    

*Registration:*                         N/A.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 John H. Flack, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, MS: T10-E46, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, (301) 415-5739, email: jhf@nrc.gov.

Dated this 13th day of January 2000.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Jack E. Rosenthal,

Chief, Regulatory Effectiveness Assessment & Human Factors Branch, Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.

[FR Doc. 00-1453 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
§ 3030.282 Increased pricing efficiency. ( a ) For a workshare discount that is equal to the cost avoided by the Postal Service for not providing the applicable service, no proposal to adjust a rate associated with that workshare discount may change the size of the discount.
( b ) For a workshare discount that exceeds the cost avoided by the Postal Service for not providing the applicable service, no proposal to adjust a rate associated with that workshare discount may increase the size of the discount.
( c ) For a workshare discount that is less than the cost avoided by the Postal Service for not providing the applicable service, no proposal to adjust a rate associated with that workshare discount may decrease the size of the discount.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4975

   To designate the post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal 
 Square, Newark, New Jersey, as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg Post Office 
                           and Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2000

 Mr. LoBiondo (for himself, Mr. Payne, Mr. Andrews, Mr. Franks of New 
  Jersey, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Holt, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Pallone, Mr. 
 Pascrell, Mr. Rothman, Mrs. Roukema, Mr. Saxton, and Mr. Smith of New 
   Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal 
 Square, Newark, New Jersey, as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg Post Office 
                           and Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF FRANK R. LAUTENBERG POST OFFICE AND 
              COURTHOUSE.

    The post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal Square, Newark, 
New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg 
Post Office and Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the post office and courthouse referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Frank R. 
Lautenberg Post Office and Courthouse.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS,
INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350:AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Matthew J. Espe, Chief Executive Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   February 17, 2004

|/s/ MATTHEW J. ESPEMatthew J. Espe                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

VENUS CONCEPT USA INC.

PLAINTIFF(S) 

v.

EXOTIC V'S BEAUTY BAR AND SPA, et al.,

DEFENDANT(S). 

CASE NUMBER

 1:22−cv−23223−DPG

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

Clerk's Default

 It appearing that the defendant(s) herein, is/are in default for failure to appear, answer, or otherwise plead

to the complaint filed herein within the time required by law.

Default is hereby entered against defendant(s)

Exotic V's Beauty Bar and Spa

Victoria Naborne

as of course, on the date May 8, 2023.

Angela E. Noble

CLERK OF COURT

By /s/ Lisa Streets

Deputy Clerk

cc: Judge Darrin P. Gayles

 Venus Concept USA Inc.

DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a)

CV−37 (10/01)

Case 1:22-cv-23223-DPG Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/08/2023 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-40462) of Digitas Inc. of our report dated March
15, 1999, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated March 15, 1999 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 2001
#### CHRISTIAN F. A. DAMBMANN, Appellant, *v.*HERMAN SCHULTING, Respondent.

*Appeal*— waived *by taking the benefit of order appealed from*— extra *allowance condition of discontinuance.*

When a plaintiff, having leave to discontinue an action upon the payment of defendant’s taxed costs and $100 extra allowance, paid the costs and the $100 under protest, and then appealed from so much of the order as allowed the $100 extra allowance: *held,*that plaintiff’s compliance with the conditions of the order was a waiver of the right of appeal.

Motion to dismiss an appeal taken from so much of an order of the Special Term as granted an extra allowance.

The order provided that the plaintiff have leave to discontinue the above entitled action, upon payment to the defendant’s attorney the taxed costs, and the sum of $100, granted as an extra allowance therein.

*William*Watson, for the appellant.

*G. Bainbridge*Smith, for the respondent.

*30Davis, P. J. :

The order in this case provided that the plaintiff have leave to discontinue the above entitled action, upon payment to the defendant of taxed costs, and the sum of $100, granted as an extra allowance herein. The plaintiff appealed from so much of the order as awards the allowance of $100 to the defendant. But it appears that, before bringing this appeal, he had paid the costs and allowance, and availed himself of the leave to discontinue which the order gave upon the condition of payment. His affidavit states that he paid the $100 under protest. From the peculiar form of the order, we think he could not avail himself of its benefits, without complying with its conditions, and that his compliance with the conditions was a waiver of his right to appeal. This court held, in *Qojjrn*v. *Colee*(4 Hun, 616), that, in difficult and extraordinary cases, an additional allowance may be made, under section 309 of the Code, where the plaintiff discontinued the action before trial on payment of costs. It cannot be said, therefore, that the court below, in following that decision, acted in excess of its power ; and probably the appeal would only bring before us the question whether or not the discretion of the court below was improperly exercised under the circumstances of this case. If the appellant desired to review that question, we think he should have refrained from availing himself of the conditional leave given by paying the costs and allowance imposed, until he could bring the question before this court by appeal.

Motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted, but, under the circumstances, without costs.

Daniels and Brady, JJ., concurred.

Motion granted, without costs.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.3 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this part: *Credential* means any or all of the following: ( 1 ) Merchant mariner's document.
( 2 ) Merchant mariner's license.
( 3 ) STCW endorsement.
( 4 ) Certificate of registry.
( 5 ) Merchant mariner credential.
*Merchant mariner credential or MMC* means the credential issued by the Coast Guard under 46 CFR part 10. It combines the individual merchant mariner's document, license, and certificate of registry enumerated in 46 U.S.C. subtitle II part E as well as the STCW endorsement into a single credential that serves as the mariner's qualification document, certificate of identification, and certificate of service.
[USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11213, Mar. 16, 2009]