alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 173.27 Numbers: Display; size; color. ( a ) Each number required by § 173.15 must: ( 1 ) Be painted on or permanently attached to each side of the forward half of the vessel except as allowed by paragraph (b) or required by paragraph (c) of this section;
( 2 ) Be in plain vertical block characters of not less than 3 inches in height;
( 3 ) Contrast with the color of the background and be distinctly visible and legible;
( 4 ) Have spaces or hyphens that are equal to the width of a letter other than “I” or a number other than “1” between the letter and number groupings (Example: DC 5678 EF or DC-5678-EF); and
( 5 ) Read from left to right.
( b ) When a vessel is used by a manufacturer or by a dealer for testing or demonstrating, the number may be painted on or attached to removable plates that are temporarily but firmly attached to each side of the forward half of the vessel.
( c ) On vessels so configured that a number on the hull or superstructure would not be easily visible, the number must be painted on or attached to a backing plate that is attached to the forward half of the vessel so that the number is visible from each side of the vessel.
( d ) Each number displayed on a tender exempted under § 173.13 must meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section and have a space or hyphen that is equal to the width of a letter other than “I” or a number other than “1” between the suffix and the number. (Example: DC 5678 EF 1 or DC-5678-EF-1.)
EXHIBIT 31.1
 RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION
  I, Edward J. Shoen, certify that:
  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMERCO and U-Haul International, Inc.;
  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Edward J. Shoen
 Edward J. Shoen
 President and Chairman of the
 Board of AMERCO and U-Haul
 International, Inc.
  Date: February 9, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), David L. Yowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|

|/s/ David L. Yowan
|------------------
|Name:             
|Title:            
|Date:             

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or
as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Honorable Ted Butler Opinion i?O. M- 974 

Criminal District Attorney 

Bexar County Courthouse Re : Nay the date of selection 

San Antonio, Texas 78204 of a depository of bexar 

County hospital District be 

changed from February to 

October and a related quesDear Mr. Dutler: tion. 

You have requested our opinion concerning whether the 

bexar County Hospital District may legally select a depository 

in October instead of February. 

In the past the iiospital District has selected its 

depository in the month of February of even numbered years. 

Section 10 of Article 4494(n), Vernon's Civil Statutes, in 

part, provides that the hospital District shall select a depository "in the manner provided by law for selection of 

county depositories; and such depository shall be the depository of such District for a period of two years thereafter, until its successor is selected and qualified." 

The statutes relative to county depositories require 

the selection by the Commissioner's Court at the February Regular Term. Article 2544, et seq., Vernon's Civil Statutes. 

Provisions of statutes requiring the selection of a depository 

every two years are mandatory and must be complied with in all 

respects. In re Cameron Trust Co., 51 S.W.2d 1025, (NO. sup . 

1932); Attorney General's Opinion iJo. O-3837 (1941). Said 

Attorney General's Opinion states: 

"We think the above mentioned statutes 

and contract itself fix the term of the depository and that such relation continues for such 

time and cannot be terminated at will by either 

party to the contract." 

In the above cited Nissouri case, at 51 S.W.2d 1026, 

the court held that the statute required the selection of a 

depository every two years; that tile contract expired at the end 

of the two year period; "and could not be extended or continued 

by common consent." 

-4755- 
Hon. Ted butler, page 2 (M-974) 

In February of 1970, the present depository was selected by the Bexar County Hospital District for a two year term. 

It is our opinion that the said Hospital District may not legally 

select a new depository in October of 1971, or extend the term 

for the depository until October of 1972. 

SUMNARY 

The aexar County iiospital District may 

not change the month of selection of its 

depository from February to October after the 

depository was selected for a two year term in 

February of 1970. 

'7 

Yo& very truly, 

/ 

General of Texas 

Prepared by Jack Sparks " 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPKOVtiD: 

OPINIW COMM.ITTE;I; 

~Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W.L. Allen, Co-Chairman 

John Reeves 

w-0. .shultz 

Lewis Jones 

I;)ill Corbusier 

ALFRSD I?AXLR 

Rxecutive Assistant 

NOLA WHIT& 

First Assistant 

-4756-
Exhibit 10.03

            ADDENDUM 2 TO THE SIMON EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF 8-01-02

     The following articles of the David Simon Employment Agreement effective
8-01-2002 as amended on 7-28-2003, are hereby amended as of May 1, 2004:

         1. Under paragraph III. F. 4. Stock, Stock Options and Bonuses : The
company will expense the exercise price, and all applicable taxes and
withholding thereon, of five (.05) cents per stock share option for each of the
twelve million (12,000,000) stock option shares that were already granted under
the original contract agreement, as long as the company has the available
financial resources to expense the options and pay all applicable taxes and
withholding thereon, if any, in the following manner; four million (4,000,000)
share options annually, beginning six (6) months from the first anniversary date
of the employment agreement addendum (dated 8-01-03) on May 1, 2004: then four
million (4,000,000) on January 1,2005; and the final four million (4,000,000) on
January 1, 2006 or anytime thereafter as soon as the company has the available
resources for this expense. Employee will have to be continually employed by the
company when these options are expensed by the company.

         2. Under paragraph III. F. 4. Stock, Stock Options and Bonuses :
Employee will be compensated annually with a performance bonus based on the net
profit of the Company, before deducting prior accrued losses, based on the
following schedule:

         a. Five percent (5%) of the first one million dollars profit for
            that year

         b. Four percent (4%) of the second million dollars profit for that
            year

         c. Three percent (3%) of the third one million dollars profit for
            that year

         d. Two percent (2%) of the fourth million dollars profit for that
            year

         e. One percent (1%) of the remaining profit for that year

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties hereto have executed this
Addendum Agreement on May 1, 2004.


    Schimatic Cash Transactions Network.com,     Employee: David Simon
    Inc.
    330 E. Warm Springs R                                  2859 E. Wasatch Blvd.
    Las Vegas, NV., 8911                                   Sandy, Utah, 84092


    By: /s/ Bernard F. McHale                  By: /s/ David Simon
        -----------------------------              -----------------------------
    Bernard F. McHale, CFO/Director                David Simon, CEO/Director
July 10,2014 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Wilbur Wright Building 

800 Independence A venue Southwest 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

CAS 

oertlfledAVfatlon.cam 

RECEIVED 

JUL 1 4 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

Reference: Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty-FAA Case No. 2014 WP9l 0075 

Certified Aviation Services, LLC (CAS) is in receipt of the above referenced final notice. Per 14 

C.F .R. Section 13 .16, CAS has 15 days after the receipt of the reference fmal notice, to request a 

hearing in this matter. Please accept this letter as CAS' request for a hearing in the matter ofthe 

proposed civil penalty resulting from FAA Case No. 2014WP910075. 

Please feel free to contact me at: 

Certified Aviation Services, LLC 

ll50 S. Vineyard Ave. 

Ontario, CA 91761 

Attention: William Corteal 

Office: (909) 458-6462 

e-mail: wcorteal!{ilcertifiedaviation.com 

Cc J.M. Harper, FAA Office ofRegional counsel-ANM-7 

Certified Aviation Services, llC 

1150 S. Vineyard Ave., Ontario, CA 91761 

tel 909~605-0380 www.certifiedaviation.com
From: Flemming Hansen [mailto:FGH@topsoe.com]

Sent: Montag, 30. Juni 2008 09:17

To: Hans Hartenstein Subject: RE: Tail-end SCR

Hans,

I have found an e-mail from EERC that indicates th e Otter Creek test was started about Aug 20, 2003. You are right that there were several SCRs operating at the time although only in the ozone season. The Baldwin test was delayed for some time but started about mid Sept 2001 . After completion the test reactor was moved to Otter

Tail.

Let me know if you need more back up information

Flemming G. Hansen Manager SCR DeNOx Catalyst Haldor Topsoe, Inc. 281-228-5120 (office) 281-228-5129 (fax) 281-684-8820 (cell) FGH@Topsoe.com

www.topsoe.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-81294-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

________________________________/

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING UPCOMING DEADLINES BY ONE WEEK

THIS MOTION comes before the Court on the government’s request [ECF No. 194] 

for a one-week extension of time of upcoming deadlines pending the issuance of the 

Eleventh Circuit’s mandate in Donald J. Trump v. United States of America, No. 22-13005 

(11th Cir. Dec. 1, 2022) (per curiam). The Court reviewed the motion and the relevant 

record. Upon review, the Court EXTENDS upcoming deadlines by one week as follows. 

1. The government’s response to Plaintiff’s motion to unseal the search-warrant 

affidavit (D.E. 189) be and hereby is extended to and including December 13, 2022.

2. The parties’ response to the News Media’s Joint Motion for Access to 

Unredacted Search Warrant Affidavit (D.E. 192) be and hereby is extended to and including 

December 21, 2022.

3. The Special Master’s report and recommendation (D.E. 125, at 5) be and 

hereby is extended to and including December 23, 2022. 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 194-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 2nd day of 

December 2022.

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 194-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/02/2022 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP97-287-051]

      ( print page 36682)    
Take notice that on June 1, 2000, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets to become effective June 1, 2000:

Thirtieth Revised Sheet No. 30

Twenty-Fifth Revised Sheet No. 31

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 31A

El Paso states that the above tariff sheets are being filed to implement two negotiated rate contracts pursuant to the Commission's Statement of Policy on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines and Regulation of Negotiated Transportation Services of Natural Gas Pipelines issued January 31, 1996 at Docket Nos. RM95-6-000 and RM96-7-000.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14558  Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.210 Who does this subpart apply to? ( a ) This subpart applies— ( 1 ) To a responsible person who owns or operates a U.S. vessel(s) engaged on a foreign voyage which meet the conditions of paragraph (a)(2) of this section;
( 2 ) To all U.S. vessels engaged on a foreign voyage that are— ( i ) A vessel transporting more than 12 passengers; or
( ii ) A tanker, a bulk freight vessel, a freight vessel or a self-propelled mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU) of 500 gross tons or more; and
( 3 ) To all foreign vessels engaged on a foreign voyage, bound for ports or places under the jurisdiction of the U.S., and subject to Chapter IX of SOLAS.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to— ( 1 ) A barge;
( 2 ) A recreational vessel not engaged in commercial service;
( 3 ) A fishing vessel;
( 4 ) A vessel operating only on the Great Lakes or its tributary and connecting waters; or
( 5 ) A public vessel, which includes a U.S. vessel of the National Defense Reserve Fleet owned by the U.S. Maritime Administration and operated in non-commercial service.
( c ) Any responsible person and their company who owns and operates a U.S. flag vessel(s) which does not meet the conditions of paragraph (a), may voluntarily meet the standards of this part and Chapter IX of SOLAS and have their safety management systems certificated.
( d ) The compliance date for the requirements of this part are— ( 1 ) On or after July 1, 1998, for— ( i ) Vessels transporting more than 12 passengers engaged on a foreign voyage; or
( ii ) Tankers, bulk freight vessels, or high speed freight vessels of at least 500 gross tons or more, engaged on a foreign voyage.
( 2 ) On or after July 1, 2002, for other freight vessels and self-propelled mobile offshore drilling units (MODUs) of at least 500 gross tons or more, engaged on a foreign voyage.
§ 332.5 Ecological performance standards. ( a ) The approved mitigation plan must contain performance standards that will be used to assess whether the project is achieving its objectives. Performance standards should relate to the objectives of the compensatory mitigation project, so that the project can be objectively evaluated to determine if it is developing into the desired resource type, providing the expected functions, and attaining any other applicable metrics (e.g., acres).
( b ) Performance standards must be based on attributes that are objective and verifiable. Ecological performance standards must be based on the best available science that can be measured or assessed in a practicable manner. Performance standards may be based on variables or measures of functional capacity described in functional assessment methodologies, measurements of hydrology or other aquatic resource characteristics, and/or comparisons to reference aquatic resources of similar type and landscape position. The use of reference aquatic resources to establish performance standards will help ensure that those performance standards are reasonably achievable, by reflecting the range of variability exhibited by the regional class of aquatic resources as a result of natural processes and anthropogenic disturbances. Performance standards based on measurements of hydrology should take into consideration the hydrologic variability exhibited by reference aquatic resources, especially wetlands. Where practicable, performance standards should take into account the expected stages of the aquatic resource development process, in order to allow early identification of potential problems and appropriate adaptive management.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation
(the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
David L. Yowan, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                   | 
|---------------------------------- | 
|/s/ David L.
 Yowan                | 
|                                   | 
|Name:  David
 L. Yowan             | 
|Title:    Chief
 Executive Officer | 
|Date:    November 10, 2010         | 

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

E-6

---