alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

132087 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. THERESA BAILEY, a/k/a THERESA LONG, Stephen J. Markman, Individually and as Personal Representative Justices of the Estate of CHRISTAL BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 132087 COA: 267546 Wayne CC: 04-411504-NH SETHAVARANGURA PORNPICHIT, M.D., a/k/a PORNPICHIT SETHAVARANGURA, M.D., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of October 16, 2006, this Court granted immediate consideration and a stay of the trial court proceedings. On orde r of the Court, the a pplication for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 judgment of the Court of App eals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the portion of the judgment of the Court of Appeals remanding th is case to the trial court for entry of an order dismissing the case with prejudice, and REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for entry of an or der dismissing the case without prejudice. See Kirkaldy v Rim

, 478 Mich 581 (2007). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remain ing question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

l1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 17, 2007

Clerk
U.S. Department of the Interior
U.S. Geological Survey

Professional Paper 1568
Plate 6

SYSTEM

MISSISSIPPIAN [PENNSYLVANIAN@)_]

PENNSYLVANIAN

PERMIAN

SERIES

CHESTERIAN (PART) _[_MORROWANC)_]

MORROWAN

UPPER MORROWAN AND (OR) LOWER ATOKAN LOWER ATOKAN

FORMATION/MEMBER eee

LOWER MEMBER OF WAHOO LIMESTONE

UPPER MEMBER OF WAHOO LIMESTONE

ECHOOKA|
EM.

ICONODONT ZONE/FAUNA

(Biostratigraphically significant -—hy
foraminifer) y

ROCK TYPE

Upper muricatus Subzone (Globivalvulina >) Moduliferus - primus Zone

minutus Fauna (Pseugostaffella spp.)|

bulloides)

lower minutus Fauna

Idiognathodus Fauna

=
=]

i

CeySNtas SaMatyc Sc 52g

BNBSEN

THICKNESS
(METERS)

bo

50

Gath

Cavusgnathus unicomis
Cavusgnathus spp. indet.
Cavusgnathus?tytthus
Cavusgnathus altus

Gnathodus spp. indet.

Gnathodus bilineatus bilineatus
G. bilineatus subsp. indet]
+ Gnathodus girtyi girtyi

Idioprioniodus conjunctus?
Idioprioniodus spp. indet.

Lochriea commutata
+ Rhachistognathus muricatus
‘Rhachistognathus spp. indet.

R. muricatus trans. to R. webstert
Rhachistognathus prolixus?
Vogelgnathus postcampbelli

Cayusgnathoids

x?

x?

_— — Sh

— — -xXR? —XxR?

1odus girtyi simplex

Gnathodus girtyi subspp. indet. | _X

G.girtyi trans. to Declinognathodus spp.
Hindeodus minutus

Hindeodus spp. indet.

Kladognathus spp.

EXPLANATION

A

II

V/A

Grainstone

2]
[aa]
Grainstone-
packstone

I
LI

Packstone

X Species
identified in
sample

X?_ Assignment to

questionable

Packstone-wackestone

Wackestone

Wackestone-mudstone

* Index species
R_ Redeposited

R? Redeposition
uncertain

species or genus a

Redeposition or
probable redeposition

Mudstone

Siltstone

Dolomitized
(combined with
other lithologies)
ce
Chert nodules

%o
oids common
to abundant

Adetognathus spp. indet. x?

+ Declinognathodus noduliferus japonicus

%* Declinognathodus noduliferus noduliferus

% Declinognathodus noduliferus subspp. indet

Gnathodus defectus | x?

+ Rhachistognathus websteri

Adetognathus lautus
Adetognathus spathus
% Rhachistognathus minutus subspp. indet.

x?

+ Rhachistognathus minutus minutus

+ Rhachistognathus minutus declinatus

+ Phachistognathus minutus havlenai

Rhachistognathus muricatus trans. to R. primus »——*

+ Idiognathodus. spp. indet.

+ Idiognathodus sinuosus
Diplognathodus? ellesmerensis?
Idioprioniodus ct. . healdi?
Idiognathoides sinuatus

+ Idiognathodus incurvus?

‘Neognathodus? sp. indet

x

Conodont zones, faunal intervals, and species distribution and lithologies of the Wahoo Limestone in the study section, eastern Sadlerochit Mountains, northeast Brooks Range, Alaska
§ 174.17 Contents of application for certificate of number. ( a ) An application for a certificate of number must contain the following information: ( 1 ) Name of owner.
( 2 ) Address of owner, including ZIP code.
( 3 ) Owner identifier, which must be the owner's tax identification number, date of birth together with driver's license number, or date of birth together with other unique number.
( 4 ) State of principal operation.
( 5 ) Number previously issued by an issuing authority.
( 6 ) Application type: Authorized terms are “new number”, “renewal of number”, or “transfer of ownership”.
( 7 ) Primary operation: Authorized terms are, “charter fishing”, “commercial fishing”, “commercial passenger carrying”, “dealer or manufacturer demonstration”, “other commercial operation”, “pleasure”, or “rent or lease”.
( 8 ) Make and model of vessel.
( 9 ) Model year.
( 10 ) Hull identification number, if any.
( 11 ) Overall length of vessel.
( 12 ) Vessel type: Authorized terms are “air boat”, “auxiliary sail”, “cabin motorboat”, “houseboat”, “inflatable boat”, “open motorboat”, “paddlecraft”, “personal watercraft”, “pontoon boat”, “rowboat”, “sail only”, or “other”.
( 13 ) Hull material: Authorized terms are “aluminum”, “fiberglass”, “plastic”, “rubber/vinyl/canvas”, “steel”, “wood”, or “other”.
( 14 ) Propulsion type: Authorized terms are “air thrust”, “manual”, “propeller”, “sail”, “water jet”, or “other”.
( 15 ) Engine drive type: Authorized terms are “inboard”, “outboard”, “pod drive”, “sterndrive”, or “other”.
( 16 ) Fuel: Authorized terms are “electric”, “diesel”, “gas”, or “other”.
( 17 ) Signature of the owner.
( b ) ( 1 ) An application made by a manufacturer or dealer for a number that is to be temporarily affixed to a vessel for demonstration or test purposes may omit the information under paragraphs (a)(9) through (a)(17) of this section.
( 2 ) An application made by an owner of a vessel without propulsion machinery may omit the information under paragraphs (a)(16) and (a)(17) of this section.
( c ) For an issuing authority listed in 33 CFR part 173, Appendix A on April 27, 2012, the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section apply on January 1, 2017. Between April 27, 2012 and January 1, 2017, the issuing authority may continue to accept applications containing the contents required by that reporting authority prior to April 27, 2012.
[USCG-2003-14963, 77 FR 18702, Mar. 28, 2012]
#### § 51.4 Definitions.

*Applicant.* A former member of the Coast Guard who has been discharged from the service but excluding those discharged by sentence of a court-martial, except as provided in § 51.3. If the former member is deceased or incompetent, the term “applicant” includes the surviving spouse, next-of-kin, or legal representative who is acting on behalf of the former member.

*Counsel.* An individual or agency designated by the applicant who agrees to represent the applicant in a case before the DRB. It includes, but is not limited to: A lawyer who is a member of the bar of a federal court or of the highest court of a state; an accredited representative designated by an organization recognized by the Administrator of Veterans Affairs; a representative from a state agency concerned with veterans affairs; or a representative from private organizations or local government agencies.

*Discharge.* Any formal separation of a member from the Coast Guard which is not termed “honorable”, including dismissals and “dropping from the rolls”. This term also includes the assignment of a separation program designator, separation authority, the stated reason for the discharge, and the characterization of service.

*Discharge Review.* The process by which the reason for separation, the procedures followed in accomplishing separation, and the characterization of service are evaluated. This includes determinations made under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 3103(e)(2).

*Discharge Review Board.* A board consisting of five members of the U.S. Coast Guard, appointed by the Commandant of the Coast Guard and vested with the authority to review the discharge of a former member. The board is empowered to change a discharge or issue a new discharge to reflect its findings, subject to review by the Commandant or the Secretary.

*Hearing.* A proceeding which, upon request of the applicant, is utilized in the discharge review process enabling the applicant and/or the applicant's representative to appear before the DRB and present evidence.

*President.* An officer of the United States Coast Guard appointed by the Commandant as President to preside over the DRB. The President will convene the board and may also serve as a member. If the President does not serve as a member of the DRB, the President shall designate a presiding officer for the board to serve as President.

[CGD 81-104, 50 FR 41495, Oct. 11, 1985, as amended by CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33663, June 28, 1996]
**Exhibit99.2**

 

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Joseph J. Talley,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report of American Crystal Sugar Company on Form 10-Q for the periodended May 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of American Crystal Sugar Company.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American CrystalSugar Company and will be retained by American Crystal Sugar Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| By:         |  /s/ Joseph J. Talley                                                 |
|-------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  |  Joseph J. Talley                                                     |
| Title:      |  Vice President Finance    and Chief Financial Officer |
|             |                                                                            |  |

 

----
§ 384.7 How does the Corps of Engineers communicate with state and local officials concerning its programs and activities? ( a ) For those programs and activities covered by a state process under § 384.6, the responsible Corps official, to the extent permitted by law: ( 1 ) Uses the state process to determine views of state and local elected officials; and
( 2 ) Communicates with state and local elected officials, throught the state process, as early in a program planning cycle as is reasonably feasible to explain specific plans and actions.
( b ) The District Engineer provides notice to directly affected state, areawide, regional, and local entities in a state of proposed Federal financial assistance or direct Federal development if: ( 1 ) The state has not adopted a process under the Order; or
( 2 ) The assistance or development involves a program or activity not selected for the state process.
This notice may be made by publication in the Federal Register or other appropriate means, which the District Engineer in his discretion deems appropriate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of meetings.

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Year 2000 Summer Study Task Forces on Defensive Information Operations, Intelligence Needs for Civil Support, Defense Against Biological Weapons, and Unconventional Nuclear Warfare will meet in closed session on August 6-18, 2000, at the Beckman Center, Irvine, California.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Task Forces will focus on assuring DoD's ability to carry out Joint Vision 2010 in the face of information warfare attack; developing an integrated picture of the intelligence required to effectively contribute to our civil support responsibilities in the three threat areas; increasing our future preparedness to deter, defend against, respond to, and attribute attack on the Nation by biological weapons; and addressing the current state of detection, identification, response and prevention of terrorist, subnational, or other unconventional nuclear attacks on the U.S.

In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II (1994)), it has been determined that these DSB Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly these meetings will be closed to the public.

Dated: June 9, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 00-15076  Filed 6-14-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
§ 3001.110 Additional required notification of disqualification when seeking employment. ( a ) Notwithstanding 5 CFR 2635.603(a), an employee that seeks employment with the Postal Service must provide written notice of disqualification to the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO) consistent with 5 CFR 5601.103(a). The DAEO will inform the employee and the employee's supervisor in writing of each matter from which the employee is disqualified from participating.
( b ) An employee may withdraw written notice under paragraph (a) of this section consistent with 5 CFR 5601.103(b).
[82 FR 50321, Oct. 31, 2017. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paul H. Hough, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Paul H. Hough
---------------------------------
Name:    Paul H. Hough
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    May 13, 2005


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under
that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: PMN: 09-0071 Focus Ready Draft 12/4/2008 ENGINEER: Macek \ AH PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: USE: OTHER USES: MSDS: Label: No

TLV/PEL:
CRSS : Chemical Name: S-H20: 0.0002 g/L @ VP: 4.5E-5 torr @ MW: 382.00 %<500 %<1000

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt (1 of 7) [3/15/2010 2:05:06 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt ws = 2E-5 mg/L, log P = 11.03. Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (11/25/2008): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P2B1T1 Health: 2 Not Required Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC =2 ppb) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None. EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt (2 of 7) [3/15/2010 2:05:06 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: PMN: 09-0071

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt (3 of 7) [3/15/2010 2:05:06 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt (4 of 7) [3/15/2010 2:05:06 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: PMN: 09-0071

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt (5 of 7) [3/15/2010 2:05:06 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt (6 of 7) [3/15/2010 2:05:06 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt
CBI: MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION CALL BY: Ariel Hou Organization: ERG CALL TO: ha Organization: Date: 11/26/2008 Time: 3PM Phone: Concerning what TSCA CBI? PMN: 09-0071

file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090071.eng.txt (7 of 7) [3/15/2010 2:05:06 PM]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7692

KENNETH N. HAMMOND; CHARLES EDWARD FORRESTER, JR.; PHILLIP DUCKETT, Petitioners, versus DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Warden; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AGENCIES; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Mayor; EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., Chairman, United States Parole Commission; ODIE WASHINGTON, in his official capacity as Director, D. C. Department of Corrections; JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees, versus KENNETH A. HINTON, Movant - Appellant, ORLANDO R. WILLIS BEY, Movant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-864-AM) Submitted: February 10, 2003 Decided: March 10, 200323 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth A. Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly C. Matthews, OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL, Washington, D.C.; Richard Parker, Major Francis Patrick King, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: Kenneth A. Hinton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to join an action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Hinton seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. SeeBhd. of R.R. Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. , 331 U.S. 519, 524-25 (1947) (finding that denial of motion for permissive intervention not immediately appealable). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Hinton’s motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1104 Security Zone: San Diego Bay, CA. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: on the waters along the northern shoreline of Naval Base Coronado, the area enclosed by the following points: Beginning at 32°42′53.0′′ N, 117°11′45.0 W (Point A); thence running northerly to 32°42′55.5′′ N, 117°11′45.0′′ W, (Point B); thence running easterly to 32°42′57.0′′ N, 117°11′31.0′′ W, (Point C); thence southeasterly to 32°42′42.0′′ N, 117°11′04.0′′ W (Point D); thence southeasterly to 32°42′21.0′′ N, 117°10′47.0′′ W (Point E) thence running southerly to 32°42′13.0′′ N, 117°10′51.0′′ W (Point F); thence running generally northwesterly along the shoreline of Naval Base Coronado to the place of beginning. All coordinates referenced use datum: NAD 1983.
( b ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.33 of this part, entry into the area of this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port San Diego; Commander, Naval Base Coronado, or Commander, Navy Region Southwest.
( 2 ) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone may contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number 619-683-6495 or on VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz) to seek permission to transit the area. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port or his or her designated representative.
( c ) *Authority.* In addition to 46 U.S.C. 70034 and 46 U.S.C. 70051, the authority for this section includes 46 U.S.C. 70116.
( d ) *Enforcement.* The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of this security zone by the U.S. Navy.
[COTP San Diego, 68 FR 25290, May 12, 2003]
#### § 242.2 Change of site—fourth-class offices.

Report by memorandum to chief, organization and management branch, when change in site is necessary. Complete Form 1021 when furnished. Retain one copy in files. If new location is one-fourth of a mile or more from existing location, furnish a statement signed by majority of customers approving change. When a change involves moving a post office from one county to another, notify the Deputy Postmaster General, of the circumstances (including a sketch showing present and proposed sites), and await approval of that Division.

(39 U.S.C. 401)

[36 FR 4765, Mar. 12, 1971]