alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), David L. Yowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|

|/s/ David L. Yowan
|------------------
|Name:             
|Title:            
|Date:             

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or
as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
#### § 11.1 Establishment.

The Board of Governors may create such advisory boards as it may deem appropriate and may appoint persons to serve thereon or may delegate such latter authority to the Postmaster General.

[73 FR 78983, Dec. 24, 2008]
RICHARD F. BRYANT,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-0287

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 13, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Karen A. Gievers, Judge.

Richard F. Bryant, pro se, Appellant.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant's response to the Court's order of April 3, 

2017, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice to seek review upon rendition of a 

final order in the circuit court proceeding.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

DAMON LAVELLE ASBERRY *

Appellant *

*

vs. * No.

* COA No. 10-15-00032-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, *

Appellee *

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, the Appellant, by and through her undersigned Attorney of

Record, and respectfully moves the Court to extend the time for filing a petition for

discretionary review in this cause, and in support therefore would show the Court as

follows:

I.

Damon Lavelle Asberry was convicted pursuant to a jury trial and sentenced on June 13,

2008. Sentence was pronounced in open court on June 13, 2008. Defendant is now

incarcerated in the Coffield unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-institutional

division, in Tennessee Colony, Texas. Following such conviction defendant pursued a direct

appeal which was denied, as well as an application for writ of habeas corpus which was also

denied. Defendant then filed a Motion for DNA testing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 64

of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which was denied. Defendant then timely gave notice

of Appeal from the order denying his request for DNA testing.

PD-1409-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 10/30/2015 2:21:15 PM

Accepted 11/2/2015 12:34:59 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
 II.

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is currently due on November 9, 2015

V.

Appellant hereby requests an extension of time to file his Petition for Discretionary

Review until December 9, 2015, and as reasons therefore would show this cause as

follows:

Counsel does not have sufficient time to properly prepare a petition for

discretionary review by the current due date, and for that reason seeks additional time to

do so. Counsel would show that he has several other matters to complete within the next

10 days, including a brief due in the Tenth Court of Appeals, as well as a petition for

discretionary review in this Court. Counsel also has oral arguments scheduled for

November 4, 2015 in Waco, Texas.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully requests this

honorable court to extend the time for filing Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review

in this cause to December 9, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Walter M. Reaves, Jr. 

Walter M. Reaves, Jr.

100 N. 6 Street, Suite 802 th

Waco, Texas 76701

(254) 296-0020

FAX (877) 726-4411

TBA#16644200

walterreaves@att.net
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing motion was delivered

to Abel Reyna, District Attorney for McLennan County, Texas, on September 30, 2015.

 /s/ Walter M. Reaves, Jr. 

Walter M. Reaves, Jr.
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 22-0005
IN RE THE MOTION OF ANDREA R. HANEY FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA ORDER

Andrea R. Haney has filed a motion for admission tothe Barofthe StateofMontana pursuant to RuleVoftheRules for Admission, Admission on Motion. TheBar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Haney has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Andrea R. Haney may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contactingthe office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. t- L 4 DATED this day of May, 2022. ChiefJustice



# e ef e.., 05/03/2022
Case Number: PR 22-0005

# SU AI.••4-t, Justices

2
COTTON AND WOOL OUTLOOK United States Department of Agriculture

CWS-0199 Economic Research Service

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Approved by the World Agricultural Outlook Board February 11, 1999

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. Cotton Supply and Demand Overview

The 1998/99 U.S. cotton crop is currently estimated at 13.8 million bales

(upland--13.37 million and extra-long staple(ELS)--430,000) compared with 18.8

million in 1997/98. Based on the latest Cotton Ginnings report, however,

ginnings by the end of January had already reached the estimated 13.8 million
4.2 million bales. The reduction from last year is attributable to the
quarter of calender 1998 exceeded industry expectations and year-ago levels,


),%(5(;32576


7(;7,/(75$'(
86&277217(;7,/(,032576
86&277217(;7,/((;32576
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7373
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. REGINALD LAMONT USSERY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:94-cr-00095-F) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 5, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Lamont Ussery, Appellant Pro Se. Felice McConnell Corpening, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Reginald Lamont Ussery appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ussery , No. 5:94-cr-00095-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 3024.8 Statutorily authorized affirmative defense. ( a ) As an affirmative defense to an allegation of a violation of 39 U.S.C. 404a(a), the Postal Service may demonstrate that it is specifically authorized by law to take the action or inaction alleged to be a violation of that section.
( b ) Authority under 39 U.S.C. 401 or 39 U.S.C. 404 may not form the basis of an affirmative defense under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Paragraph (b) of this section does not preclude the Postal Service from arguing that a particular Postal Service regulation or other action (or inaction) does not have the requisite effect to violate 39 U.S.C. 404a(a).
Belknap

No. 7901

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Carol M. Fournier

April 7, 1978

*David H. Souter,*attorney general, and *Anne E. Cagwin,*attorney, by brief *(Deborah Cooper,*attorney, orally), for the State of New Hampshire.

*Haughey & Philpot,*of Laconia *(William Philpot, Jr.,*by brief), for the defendant.

Per curiam.

A habitual offender petition, RSA ch. 262-B (Supp. 1975), was filed by the Belknap County attorney against Carol M. Fournier. In each of three prior qualifying convictions required by RSA 262-B:2 (Supp. 1975) (one for driving while intoxicated, RSA 262-A:62 (Supp. 1975), and two for operating after revocation of license, RSA 262:27) the defendant signed a waiver of counsel form and entered a guilty plea.

At a hearing on the petition the defendant objected to the admissibility of the records of the various courts wherein convictions had been obtained. The Trial Court *(Batchelder,*J.) transferred the objection without ruling.

In this collateral attack the defendant contends that the prior motor vehicle convictions on which the State relies are constitutionally defective. With respect to none of the three individual convictions relied on does the defendant allege that she did not knowingly and intelligently waive counsel; that she had no knowledge of the *231direct consequences of her plea to the particular offense; or that she was unaware of her various constitutional rights. *See State v. Robinson,*117 N.H. 496, 374 A.2d 953 (1977). Rather, as expressed by her, “the issue to be resolved [here] is whether prior Court records are admissible when they do not reveal whether the defendant was notified prior to [each] sentencing that she could be found to be an Habitual Offender after three such convictions for motor vehicle violations.”

The cases relied on by the defendant are inapposite. The claim in the instant case is similar to that made in *State v. Ramsden,*117 N.H. 772, 378 A.2d 1370 (1977), wherein the defendant contended that he was wrongfully not additionally advised, at the time of his arrest, that the director of motor vehicles may in his discretion reissue a license automatically revoked upon refusal to take a breathalyzer test. We held, in the context of interpreting a statute, that “[i]f the legislature had wanted an arrested person to be advised of all possible consequences, it could have so legislated.” *Id.*

 We hold that a defendant need only be advised of the direct consequences of his guilty plea and not of consequences which are collateral. Because consequences attendant to the commission of an offense are so numerous and logically unforeseeable, to require more would be an absurdity and would impose upon the trial court an impossible, unwarranted, and unnecessary burden. *See Nunez Cordero v. United States,*533 F.2d 723 (1st Cir. 1976).

*Exceptions overruled.*
§ 20.204 Withdrawal or disqualification. ( a ) An ALJ may disqualify herself or himself at any time.
( b ) Until the filing of the ALJ's decision, either party may move that the ALJ disqualify herself or himself for personal bias or other valid cause. The party shall file with the ALJ, promptly upon discovery of the facts or other reasons allegedly constituting cause, an affidavit setting forth in detail the reasons. ( 1 ) The ALJ shall rule upon the motion, stating the grounds for the ruling. If the ALJ concludes that the motion is timely and meritorious, she or he shall disqualify herself or himself and withdraw from the proceeding. If the ALJ does not disqualify herself or himself and withdraw from the proceeding, the ALJ shall carry on with the proceeding, or, if a hearing has concluded, issue a decision.
( 2 ) If an ALJ denies a motion to disqualify herself or himself, the moving party may, according to the procedures in subpart J of this part, appeal to the Commandant once the hearing has concluded. When that party does appeal, the ALJ shall forward the motion, the affidavit, and supporting evidence to the Commandant along with the ruling.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Custom Mechanical Systems, Corp. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912QR-12-C-0050 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59388 

R. Dale Holmes, Esq. 

Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & 

Furman PC 

Philadelphia, PA 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Kevin M. Finley, Esq. 

Travis D. Van Ort, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to a mediation conducted by the Board, the parties have settled the 

appeal. The parties jointly move the Board to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. 

The parties' motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 27 August 2015 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 593 88, Appeal of Custom 

Mechanical Systems, Corp., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Humatech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David G.
      Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                August 15, 2006
            /s/
                David G. WilliamsBy:
                 David G. WilliamsIts: 
                Chief Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Humatech, Inc. and will be retained by Humatech, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6895
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-25) Submitted: October 18, 2004 Decided: November 12, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of real property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mitchell , No. CR-02-25 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2004 & entered May 6, 2004). We deny Mitchell’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Validian Corporation (the Corporation), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



Date:  April 5, 2006



By:  /s/ Ronald Benn

Ronald Benn

Chief Financial Officer
# Diario Oficial C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 427I |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 62.° año19 de diciembre de 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 427I

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

62.° año19 de diciembre de 2019

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Anuncios |
| | PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Comisión Europea |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Convocatoria de candidaturas para el Premio Jan Amos Comenius por una Enseñanza de Calidad sobre la Unión Europea | 1 |

Sumario

Página

V   Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Comisión Europea

2019/C 427 I/01

Convocatoria de candidaturas para el Premio Jan Amos Comenius por una Enseñanza de Calidad sobre la Unión Europea

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

V Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Comisión Europea

| 19.12.2019 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CI 427/1

---

Convocatoria de candidaturas

para el Premio «Jan Amos Comenius por una Enseñanza de Calidad sobre la Unión Europea»

(2019/C 427 I/01)

La Dirección General de Educación, Juventud, Deporte y Cultura de la Comisión Europea ha puesto en marcha una convocatoria de candidaturas para el Premio Jan Amos Comenius por una Enseñanza de Calidad sobre la Unión Europea.

El premio recompensará a los centros de educación secundaria que contribuyan a que sus alumnos reciban un aprendizaje estimulante sobre la Unión. Dará reconocimiento y visibilidad en el conjunto de la Unión al trabajo realizado en cada Estado miembro, y destacará la importancia de la enseñanza y del aprendizaje sobre la Unión Europea a una edad temprana. Destacará métodos de enseñanza innovadores que conlleven una participación activa de los alumnos en este aprendizaje, y ayudará a difundir estas actividades.

La convocatoria está abierta a centros de educación secundaria (CINE nivel 2 y CINE nivel 3) establecidos y con sede en la Unión Europea (y no a profesores individuales).

Se concederán hasta veintiocho (28) premios de 8 000 EUR cada uno, uno por Estado miembro.

Si el Reino Unido abandona la UE antes de que la Comisión Europea tome la decisión relativa a la concesión del premio (lo que sucede poco después de evaluar las candidaturas) sin un acuerdo que garantice que los candidatos de este país siguen siendo elegibles, sus centros educativos no podrán optar al premio. En tal caso, el número máximo de premios será veintisiete (en lugar de veintiocho), pero el importe de cada premio será el mismo (8 000 EUR).

El plazo para la presentación de candidaturas expira el jueves 6 de febrero de 2020 a las 17.00 horas.

Toda la información pertinente y los formularios de presentación de candidaturas están disponibles en la siguiente dirección:

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_es

---
glt-ex101_63.htm



EXHIBIT 10.1

 

SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

 

During the third quarter of 2019, the Registrant entered into Change in Control Employment Agreements (the “Agreements”) with the following employees:

 

Wolfgang Laures, Senior Vice President, Global Supply Chain

Philippe Sevoz, Vice President, Global Operations

Jill L. Urey, Vice President, Deputy General Counsel & Corporate Secretary

Joseph J. Zakutney, Vice President, Global Business Services & Chief Information Officer

 

In accordance with the Instructions to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has omitted filing the individual Agreements as exhibits to this Form 10-Q because they are substantially identical to the Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and certain employees, which is filed as Exhibit 10 (q) to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.