alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4903

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to strengthen the limitation

on holding and transfer of broadcast licenses to foreign persons, and

to apply a similar limitation to holding and transfer of other telecommunications entities by or to foreign governments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 2000

Mr. DINGELL (for himself and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to strengthen

the limitation on holding and transfer of broadcast licenses to foreign persons, and to apply a similar limitation to holding and transfer of other telecommunications

entities by or to foreign governments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreign Government

5 Investment Act of 2000’’.
2

•HR 4903 IH

1 SEC. 2. FOREIGN GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT IN TELE2 COMMUNICATIONS ENTITIES.

3 Section 310 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47

4 U.S.C. 301) is amended by adding at the end thereof the

5 following:

6 ‘‘(f) LIMITATIONS ON FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OWN7 ERSHIP OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENTITIES LICENSED

8 BY THE FCC—

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other

10 provision of this Act or any other law to the con11 trary, no license, permit, or operating authority

12 under this Act may be granted to or held by a cor13 poration, joint venture, partnership, other business

14 organization, or trust directly or indirectly controlled

15 by a foreign government or its representatives.

16 ‘‘(2) PROHIBITION ABSOLUTE.—The Commis17 sion may not waive the application of paragraph (1)

18 under any other authority granted to the Commis19 sion under this or any other Act or under any Com20 mission order or rule.

21 ‘‘(3) TEST OF CONTROL.—A corporation or

22 other entity described in paragraph (1) shall be con23 sidered to be controlled by a foreign government or

24 its representatives if more than 25 percent of the

25 ownership, voting rights, capital stock, or other pe26 cuniary interest in that entity is owned, held, or con-
3

•HR 4903 IH

1 trolled, directly or indirectly, by a foreign govern2 ment or its representatives.’’.

Æ
Argued and submitted May 29,

petitions for judicial review dismissed December 9, 1992,

reconsideration denied February 10,

petition for review denied March 23, 1993 (315 Or 643)

#### SIDNEY SCOTT, *Petitioner, v.*BOARD OF PAROLE, *Respondent.*

(CA A69703 (Control), A70495)

843 P2d 959

Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the case for petitioner. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Yuanxing Chen, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*171PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of two orders of the Board of Parole.1 We conclude that we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the petitions.

Petitioner assigns error to the Board’s decision in 1991 that he maintains set his parole consideration hearing date for June 16, 2009. However, his parole consideration hearing date was changed to June 16,2009, by a March 1989, order of the Board. Neither administrative nor judicial review was sought from the 1989 order. The Board’s decision in 1991 merely affirmed the previously determined date.

ORS 144.335(1) provides:

> “When a person over whom the board exercises its jurisdiction is adversely affected or aggrieved by a final order of the board related to the granting, revoking or discharging of parole * * *, such person is entitled to judicial review of the final order.”

Our jurisdiction over Board actions is limited by ORS 144.335(1) to final orders that adversely affect or aggrieve the petitioner.

In *Willaby v. Board of Parole,*103 Or App 83, 797 P2d 1050, *rev den*310 Or 547 (1990), the Board considered whether to remove the petitioner’s dangerous offender status. It concluded that the petitioner’s status should continue, and he assigned error to that decision. We dismissed the petition, because the decision did not aggrieve or adversely affect the petitioner. ORS 144.335(1); *Willaby v. Board of Parole, supra,*103 Or App at 88; *see Harris v. Board of Parole,*288 Or 495, 503, 605 P2d 1181 (1980). The orders did not change the length of petitioner’s incarceration. He was not adversely affected or aggrieved by them.

Petitions for judicial review dismissed.

1

 Two separate petitions for review were filed, and they have been consolidated for purposes of review.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

for himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER REFERRING MOTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Magistrate Judge Rule 1, it is ORDERED that 

Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order, ECF No. [96], is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge

Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes for disposition.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on March 14, 2023.

_________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2023 Page 1 of 1
|  Onvia, Inc.2010 Management Incentive Plan  |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|  Participants                                    |  Chief Financial OfficerChief Information OfficerChief Strategy OfficerGeneral Counsel & Corporate SecretarySenior VP Products, Technology & Information  |
|   Objectives                                |  · Achieve corporate performance that most reflect stockholder interests· Drive and reward unified performance across executive team· Focus on building trend for long-term, profitable growth |
|  Key Achievement Metrics                    |  Achievement of Board defined goals around Bookings and Net Income. |
|  Bonus Target                                    |  · Chief Financial Officer                                               33% of Base Salary· Chief Information Officer                                           33% of Base Salary· Chief Strategy Officer                                                 18% of Base Salary· General Counsel & Corporate Secretary                     22% of Base Salary· Senior VP Products, Technology & Information        33% of Base Salary  |
| Overachievement                                       |  If the Company’s performance against Bookings and Net Income exceeds the Target goals established by the Board, the Board has established accelerators to modify the participants’ award levels.  |
|  Terms of Funding and Payment                    | · If the Company’s performance against Bookings or Net Income falls below the floor established by the Board, the bonus pool shall not be funded.· 50% of a participant’s share of the bonus pool will be based on the Company’s performance against Bookings and Net Income and 50% will be based on the participant’s individual goals.· 67% of a participant’s bonus payout will be in cash, the remaining 33% will be in the form of restricted stock units, subject to a vesting period of one year.· Bonus pool to be funded and targets paid upon certification by the Compensation Committee of metrics achieved by the Company.  |
§ 334.990 Long Beach Harbor, Calif.; naval restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* All the waters between the Navy mole and Terminal Island to the westward of longitude 118°13′10′′.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The area is reserved exclusively for use by naval vessels. Permission for any person or vessel to enter the area must be obtained from the enforcing agency.
( 2 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, U.S. Naval Base Los Angeles, Long Beach, California, and such agencies as he may designate.
[19 FR 891, Feb. 17, 1954, as amended at 27 FR 12368, Dec. 13, 1962. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17557, Apr. 10, 1997]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5011 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5011

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the option to 
      use rebased target amounts to all sole community hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Baldacci introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the option to 
      use rebased target amounts to all sole community hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sole Community Hospital Fair Payment 
Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF OPTION TO USE REBASED TARGET AMOUNTS TO ALL SOLE 
              COMMUNITY HOSPITALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1886(b)(3)(I)(i) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(I)(i)) (as added by section 405 of the 
Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 
(113 Stat. 1501A-372), as enacted into law by section 1000(a)(6) of 
Public Law 106-113) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subclause (I)--
                    (A) by striking ``for its cost reporting period 
                beginning during 1999 is paid on the basis of the 
                target amount applicable to the hospital under 
                subparagraph (C) and that''; and
                    (B) by striking ``such target amount'' and 
                inserting ``the amount otherwise determined under 
                subsection (d)(5)(D)(i)'';
            (2) in subclause (I), by striking ``target amount otherwise 
        applicable'' and all that follows through ``target amount')'' 
        and inserting ``the amount otherwise applicable to the hospital 
        under subsection (d)(5)(D)(i) (referred to in this clause as 
        the `subsection (d)(5)(D)(i) amount')''; and
            (3) in each of subclauses (II) and (III), by striking 
        ``subparagraph (C) target amount'' and inserting ``subsection 
        (d)(5)(D)(i) amount''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Medicare, Medicaid, and 
SCHIP Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999, as enacted into law by 
section 1000(a)(6) of Public Law 106-113.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF ENDO

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles A. Rowland, Jr., as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                            
|------ |  | ---------------------------
|       |  | /s/ Charles A. Rowland, Jr.
|Name:  |  | Charles A. Rowland, Jr.    
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer    
|Date:  |  | April 29, 2008             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be
retained by, Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 113 (Monday, June 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14713]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2623-000]


Idaho Power Company; Notice of Filing

June 6, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 26, 2000, Idaho Power Company (IPC), 
tendered Point-to-Point Transmission Service Agreements for Firm and 
Non-Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service between Idaho Power 
Company and Puget Sound Energy.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before June 16, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14713 Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-22989-ALTMAN/Reid

GLENDA SINGLETON,

Plaintiff,

v.

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, 

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties have filed a Joint 

Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (“Stipulation of Dismissal”) [ECF No. 22]. The parties ask us 

to “reserve[ ] jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement for a period not to exceed 60 

days from the date of the order of dismissal.” Stipulation of Dismissal at 1. We will not retain 

jurisdiction over a settlement agreement that we haven’t seen or approved. Accordingly, we hereby 

ORDER AND ADJUDGE as follows:

1. The claims between the Plaintiff and the Defendant are DISMISSED with prejudice.

2. The above-styled action shall remain administratively CLOSED. 

3. The parties may re-file their Stipulation of Dismissal by August 22, 2023, and either attach 

a copy of their settlement agreement or remove their request for us to retain jurisdiction. 

If the parties choose not to re-file, we note that the Stipulation of Dismissal is otherwise 

self-executing. 

4. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT and any scheduled hearings are 

TERMINATED.

Case 1:22-cv-22989-RKA Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 15, 2023.

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-22989-RKA Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-14052-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NICHOLAS JAMES SORGENFREY,

Defendant.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation entered by 

Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard Following Change of Plea Hearing [ECF No. 32]. On 

November 30, 2022, Magistrate Judge Maynard held a Change of Plea hearing [ECF No. 28] 

during which Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment [ECF No. 10] pursuant to a 

stipulated factual basis [ECF No. 30] and plea agreement [ECF No. 29]. The Government 

submitted a factual basis for the plea, and Defendant agreed that the Government’s proffer was 

true and correct. Magistrate Judge Maynard thereafter issued a Report recommending that the 

Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea to Count One in the Indictment, that the Court find Defendant 

to have freely and voluntarily entered her guilty plea, and that the Court adjudicate him guilty of 

Count One of the Indictment [ECF No. 10]. No party has filed objections to the Report, and the 

time to do so has expired. 

The Court has conducted a review of the record and finds no error in the Report. Therefore, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 32] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

Case 2:22-cr-14052-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/20/2022 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-14052-CR-CANNON

2. The guilty plea entered by Defendant Nicholas James Sorgenfrey as to Count One of

the Indictment is ACCEPTED.

3. Defendant Nicholas James Sorgenfrey is adjudicated guilty of Count One of the

Indictment, which charges him with possession of child pornography, in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2). 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 19th day of December

2022.

________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 2:22-cr-14052-AMC Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/20/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 401.95 Compliance with regulations.

The master or owner of a vessel shall ensure that all requirements of these Regulations and Seaway Notices applicable to that vessel are complied with.

[70 FR 12973, Mar. 17, 2005]
#### § 80.1102 Santa Catalina Island, CA.

The 72 COLREGS shall apply to the harbors on Santa Catalina Island.

[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFSARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, DavidA. Berg, President of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”), doeshereby certify that to his knowledge:

1.     TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 16th day of July,2007.
|        | By:                 | /s/ David A. Berg |   |   |
|--------|---------------------|-------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Name: David A. Berg |              |   |
|   | Title: President    |              |   |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### § 80.1124 Ventura Marina, CA.

A line drawn from Ventura Marina South Jetty Light 6 to Ventura Marina Breakwater South Light 3; thence to Ventura Marina North Jetty Light 7.

[CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7787, Mar. 6, 1986. Redesignated by CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
Exhibit 32.1





RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Relm Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ David P. Storey

David P. Storey

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2003
**1995- Cotton and Wool 01.12.95 [ Text  ] Cotton and Wool 02.10.95 [Text ]Cotton and Wool 03.10.95 [
Text
 ]
- Cotton and Wool 04.11.95 [ Text  ] Cotton and Wool 05.11.95 [Text ]Cotton and Wool 06.12.95 [
Text
 ]
- Cotton and Wool 07.12.95 [ Text  ] Cotton and Wool 08.11.95 [Text ]Cotton and Wool 09.12.95 [
Text
 ]
- Cotton and Wool 10.11.95 [ Text  ] Cotton and Wool 12.12.95 [Text ]

**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                  2,537,617
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           19,918
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             87,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,687,099
<PP&E>                                  1,050,600
<DEPRECIATION>                          488,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,752,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,507,468
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                18,816
<OTHER-SE>                              373,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            3,752,886
<SALES>                                 92,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        92,925
<CGS>                                   70,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           70,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        1,890,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      68,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,918,881
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,918,881
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,918,881
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.11)




</TABLE>