alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Haddrill,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, tomy knowledge:

1.     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

Date:  December21, 2006

/s/ Richard Haddrill

Richard Haddrill

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal ExecutiveOfficer)

1

----
----

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ Douglas Roth                             |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| May 7, 2010                                  |
Exhibit 32.02
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Schimatic Cash
Transactions Network.com, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Bernard F. McHale, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: January 29, 2008                By: /s/ Bernard F. McHale
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Bernard F. McHale
                                           Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
#### AMANDA O. VAIL and others, Surviving Executors, etc., Appellants, v. JOHN W. LANE, Respondent.

*Service of answer*— *when irregular.*

Appeal from order of Special Term, setting aside a judgment.

The attorneys for the appellants and all other persons connected with their office, had left the office at five and a half o’clock, p. m., and the office was closed and locked for the night. Between that time and six o’clock, the clerk of defendant’s attorney came to make service of the answer in this action; but, finding the office closed and locked, he procured the janitor of the building to unlock the door, and then left the answer on the table of the managing clerk. The janitor had no authority to open the office for that purpose, and the court held that his act in doing so was that of the clerk who procured him, and the entry of the clerk, under the circumstances, was irregular and unlawful.

The General Term concluded that the order vacating the judgment was granted as a favor, in the discretion of the court; and *654that the respondent was not charged with costs, as is usual in granting such favors, because the court discovered some slight *acidity of practice*in the proceedings of plaintiff’s attorneys. That this was a legitimate stimulant to the exercise of judicial discretion, and this court was not to be called upon to interfere with its exercise.

As by the order below, vitality had not been given to the irregular service of the answer, nor leave to serve a new answer, the General Term directed that the order should be modified by giving leave to re-serve the answer as of the date of the attempted service, so far as affected the date of the issue, with leave to reply to the answer if necessary, or to demur, or to make any motion in respect of the answer on any ground except the regularity of its service; as thus modified the order was affirmed, without costs to either party.

Tracy, *Olmstead &*Tracy, for the appellants.

*R. H.*Huntley, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Order modified, and as modified affirmed.
#### § 230.14 Record of decision and implementation.

A record of decision shall be prepared by the district commander, in accordance with 40 CFR 1505.2, for the signature of the final decisionmaker as prescribed by applicable Corps regulations. Procedures implementing the decision are discussed in 40 CFR 1505.3. Incoming letters of comment on the final EIS will be furnished for review by the decisionmaker who signs the record of decision. For example, the record of decision for feasibility reports will be signed by the ASA(CW) at the time the report is transmitted to Congress for authorization.
§ 334.1480 Vieques Passage and Atlantic Ocean, off east coast of Puerto Rico and coast of Vieques Island; naval restricted areas. ( a ) *The restricted areas.* ( 1 ) A strip, 1,500 yards wide, off the naval reservation shoreline along the east coast of Puerto Rico extending from Point Figuera south to Point Puerca, and thence west to Point Cascajo and the mouth of the Daguada River.
( 2 ) A strip, 1,500 yards wide, off the naval reservation shoreline along the west end of Vieques Island extending from Caballo Point on the north shore, west around the breakwater to Point Arenas, and thence south and east to a point on the shoreline one mile east of the site of the abandoned central at Playa Grande.
( 3 ) A strip, 1,500 yards wide, off the south coast of Vieques Island extending from the entrance to Port Mosquito east to Conejo Point.
( 4 ) An area inclosed by an arc with a radius of 3,000 yards centered on Cabras Island Lighthouse and extending from Point Puerca to Point Cascajo.
( b ) *The regulations.* No person or vessel shall enter or remain within the restricted areas at any time unless on official business. Fishing vessels are permitted to anchor in Playa Blanca, passing through the restricted area described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, to and from anchorage on as near a north-south course as sailing conditions permit. Under no conditions will swimming, diving, snorkeling, other water related activities or fishing, be permitted in the restricted area.
[13 FR 9564, Dec. 31, 1948. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17559, Apr. 10, 1997]
#### § 80.1148 Noyo River, CA.

A line drawn from Noyo River Entrance Daybeacon 4 to Noyo River Entrance Light 5.

[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary information excerpted from Form 10-Q
         for the six months ended 12/31/98
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              20,518
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       94,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                        11,756
<INVENTORY>                                         47,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   158,745
<PP&E>                                             131,794
<DEPRECIATION>                                      52,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     355,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               50,211
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         14,532
<COMMON>                                             3,426
<OTHER-SE>                                         (42,751)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       355,357
<SALES>                                             88,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   202,681
<CGS>                                               51,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      129,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    69,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      (922)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (12,094)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (61)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (12,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (12,857)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.34)
        


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExperimental aerodynamic heating to simulated shuttle tilesThe heat transfer to simulated shuttle thermal protection system tiles was investigated experimentally using a highly instrumented metallic thin wall tile arranged with other metal tiles in a staggered tile array. Cold-wall heating rate data for laminar and turbulent flow were obtained in the Langley 8-foot high temperature tunnel at a nominal Mach number of 7, a nominal total temperature of 3300 R, free-stream unit Reynolds number from 3.4 x 10 to the 5th power to 2.2 x 10 to the 6th power per foot, and free-stream dynamic pressure of 1.8 psia to 9.1 psia. Experimental data are presented to illustrate the effects of flow angularity and gap width on both local peak heating and overall heating loads.Document ID19830014276Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsAvery, D. E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Kerr, P. A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Wieting, A. R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1983Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberAIAA PAPER 83-1536NAS 1.15:84654NASA-TM-84654Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA Thermophys. Conf.Location: MontrealStart Date: June 1, 1983End Date: June 3, 1983Accession Number83N22547Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-51-23-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19830014276.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Aniel Rodriguez, Also Known as Anibal Rodriguez, Respondent.

Decided June 13, 1996

Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not "on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]).
#### Joseph STERN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 13583.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1958.

Miller & Griffin, Lexington, Ky., for appellant.

Henry J. Cook, U. S. Atty., Lexington, Ky., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

This case has been heard and considered upon the oral arguments and printed briefs of the attorney for the appellant and the United States Attorney and upon the record in the case.

The single issue presented is whether or not the trial judge abused'his discretion in denying the motion of appellant [who had been convicted of and sentenced for violation of the Anti-Narcotic Laws of the United States (26 U.S.C.A. § 2704 and 21 U.S.C.A. § 174)] for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. Such motion is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court. United States v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106, 66 S.Ct. 464, *36690 L.Ed. 562. Reversal of the trial court’s judgment in disallowing the motion must be based upon a clear showing of abuse of discretion. Winer v. United States, 6 Cir., 228 F.2d 944; Sharp v. United States, 6 Cir., 195 F.2d 997. No such showing has been made here.

The affidavit of Devers was that of a narcotic law violator who did not point the finger of accusation toward Smith, in exculpation of appellant, until after Smith had been murdered and could not contradict him. The other affiant, Thomas, an employee at the United States Public Health Service Hospital where the crime was committed, testified at the trial' of appellant, but held back his later statement casting suspicion toward the deceased Smith until after the trial and conviction of appellant.

The experienced and able District Judge Ford cannot be but upheld in his refusal to believe the affiants upon whose assertions a new trial is sought.

The judgment of the United States District Court is affirmed.
§ 401.40 Entering, exiting or position in lock. ( a ) Unless directed by the Manager and the Corporation, no vessel shall proceed into a lock in such a manner that the stem passes the stop symbol on the lock wall nearest the closed gates.
( b ) On being cast off in a lock, no vessel shall be allowed to fall back in such a manner that the stern passes the stop symbol on the lock wall nearest the closed gates.
( c ) Every vessel proceeding into a lock shall be positioned and moored as directed by the officer in charge of the mooring operation.
( d ) No vessel shall use thrusters when passing a lock gate or a Hands Free Mooring (HFM) unit.
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended and secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471)
[45 FR 52378, Aug. 7, 1980, and 47 FR 51122, Nov. 12, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 20691, May 9, 1983; 72 FR 2620, Jan. 22, 2007; 73 FR 9954, Feb. 25, 2008; 76 FR 13089, Mar. 10, 2011; 88 FR 14268, Mar. 8, 2023]
#### § 334.800 Corpus Christi Bay, Tex.; seaplane restricted area, U.S. Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi.

(a) *The area.* The waters of Corpus Christi Bay within the area described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south shore of Corpus Christi Bay at the “North Gate” of the U.S. Naval Air Station at longitude 97°17′15.0′′ W.; thence through points at:

| North latitude | West longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 27°42′34.9′′ | 97°17′09.6′′ |
| 27°41′46.8′′ | 97°14′23.8′′ |
| 27°41′15.1′′ | 97°14′35.4′′ |
| 27°41′27.0′′ | 97°15′16.7′′ |
| 27°40′41.6′′ | 97°15′33.3′′ |

thence to a point on shore at latitude 27°40′44.9′′ N.; thence along the shore to the point of beginning.

(b) *The regulations.*

(1) No person, vessel or watercraft shall enter or remain in the area at any time, day or night, except with express written approval of the enforcing agency or as a result of force majeure.

(2) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Chief of Naval Air Training, U.S. Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, Tex., and such agencies as he may designate.

[43 FR 30054, July 13, 1978. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17556, Apr. 10, 1997]
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John Adamovich, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of Aeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex
Incorporated for the period ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex
Incorporated.





/s/
      John Adamovich, Jr.Name:  John
      Adamovich, Jr.Date:  February
      17, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 211.2 Regulations of the Postal Service. ( a ) The regulations of the Postal Service consist of the following, any of which may, but are not required to, be published in the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations: ( 1 ) The resolutions of the Governors and the Board of Governors of the U.S. Postal Service and the bylaws of the Board of Governors;
( 2 ) The *Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual;* the *Postal Operations Manual;* the *Administrative Support Manual;* the *Employee and Labor Relations Manual;* the *Financial Management Manual;* the *International Mail Manual;* those portions of Chapter 2 of the former *Postal Service Manual* and chapter 7 of the former *Postal Manual* retained in force; and Publication 52, *Hazardous, Restricted, and Perishable Mail;* and
( 3 ) Headquarters Circulars, Management Instructions, Regional Instructions, Handbooks, Memoranda of Policy, Publications, delegations of authority, and other regulatory issuances and directives of the Postal Service or the former Post Office Department, to the extent that such documents state binding rules of future effect beyond those stated in other regulations of the Postal Service then in effect.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided by law, the resolutions of the Governors and the Board of Governors of the U.S. Postal Service and the bylaws of the Board of Governors take precedence over all regulations issued by other authority.
( c ) The adoption, by reference or otherwise, of any rule of law or regulation in this or any other regulation of the Postal Service shall not be interpreted as any expression on the issue of whether such rule of law or regulation would apply to the Postal Service if it were not adopted as a regulation, nor shall it restrict the authority of the Postal Service to amend or revoke the rule so adopted at a subsequent time.
( d ) All regulations of the Post Office Department in effect at the time the U.S. Postal Service commenced operations, continue in effect, except as subsequently modified or repealed by the Postal Service. Except as otherwise continued in effect as postal regulations, all regulations of other agencies of the United States continued in effect as postal regulations by section 5(a) of the Postal Reorganization Act are repealed.
[38 FR 20402, July 31, 1973, as amended at 46 FR 34329, July 1, 1981; 69 FR 36022, June 28, 2004; 69 FR 59545, Oct. 5, 2004; 70 FR 20293, Apr. 19, 2005; 86 FR 53221, Sept. 27, 2021]
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFSARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, JamesJ. Horvath, Chief Executive Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

1.    TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 16th day of July,2007.
|   | By:                             | /s/ James J. Horvath |        |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|----------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Name: James J. Horvath          |                 |   |
|   | Title: Chief Executive  Officer |                 |   |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
IB

Union Calendar No. 561

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5136

[Report No. 106–931]

To make permanent the authority of the Marshal of the Supreme Court

and the Supreme Court Police to provide security beyond the Supreme

Court building and grounds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 7, 2000

Mr. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 4, 2000

Additional sponsors: Mr. CONYERS, Mr. SCOTT, and Mr. HYDE

OCTOBER 4, 2000

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To make permanent the authority of the Marshal of the

Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Police to provide

security beyond the Supreme Court building and

grounds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5136 RH

1 SECTION 1. MAKING PERMANENT CERTAIN POLICING AU2 THORITY.

3 (a) ELIMINATION OF SUNSET PROVISION AND RE4 PORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 9 of the Act entitled

5 ‘‘An Act relating to the policing of the building and

6 grounds of the Supreme Court of the United States’’, ap7 proved August 18, 1949 (40 U.S.C. 13n), is amended—

8 (1) by striking subsection (c); and

9 (2) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub10 section (c).

11 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 9 of such Act

12 is further amended in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘are here13 by authorized’’ and inserting ‘‘is authorized’’.

Calendar No. 561

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5136

[Report No. 106–931]

A BILL

To make permanent the authority of the Marshal

of the Supreme Court and the Supreme CourtPolice to provide security beyond the SupremeCourt building and grounds.

OCTOBER 4, 2000

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 123-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2023   Page 1 of 1