alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AMERCO and U-Haul International, Inc.
      (together, the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
      2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Shoen, President and Chairman of the Board of
      AMERCO and U-Haul International, Inc. certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:




(1)




The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




AMERCO,


a
      Nevada
      corporation




/s/
      Edward J. Shoen


Edward
      J.
      Shoen


*President
      and Chairman of the Board*




Date:
      November 4, 2005




U-HAUL
      INTERNATIONAL, INC.,


a
      Nevada
      corporation




/s/
      Edward J. Shoen


Edward
      J.
      Shoen


*President
      and Chairman of the Board*




Date:
      November 4, 2005
§ 3020.110 Procedural schedule. ( a ) *Notice.* Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, the Commission shall include in the notice of proceeding issued under § 3010.151 of this chapter a procedural schedule based upon the pro forma schedule set forth in appendix A of this part. The procedural schedule shall include: ( 1 ) A deadline for notices of interventions;
( 2 ) The date(s) for the mandatory technical conference between the Postal Service, Commission staff, and interested parties;
( 3 ) The deadline for discovery on the Postal Service's direct case;
( 4 ) The deadline for responses to participant in discovery on the Postal Service's case;
( 5 ) The deadline for participants to confirm their intent to file a rebuttal case;
( 6 ) The date for filing participant rebuttal testimony, if any;
( 7 ) The dates for filing motions for leave to file surrebuttal testimony and answers thereto;
( 8 ) The date for filing surrebuttal, if any;
( 9 ) The date(s) for hearings on the Postal Service's direct case, rebuttal testimony, and surrebuttal testimony, if any;
( 10 ) The date for filing initial briefs;
( 11 ) The date for filing reply briefs; and
( 12 ) A deadline for issuance of an advisory opinion which is 90 days from the date of filing.
( b ) *Changes for good cause.* These dates are subject to change for good cause only.
( c ) *Incomplete request.* If at any time the Commission determines that the Postal Service's request is incomplete or that changes made subsequent to its filing significantly modify the request, the Commission may extend the deadlines established or take any other action as justice may require.
#### § 55.7 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Child development center* means a facility located on a Coast Guard installation that offers, on a regularly scheduled basis, developmental services designed to foster social, emotional, physical, creative, and intellectual growth to groups of children.

*Child development services* means developmental services provided at a child development center or by a family child care provider at his or her Coast Guard-owned or -leased home.

*Coast Guard family child care provider* means a Coast Guard family member, 18 years of age or older, who provides child care for 10 hours or more per week per child to one but no more than six children, including the provider's own children under the age of eight, on a regular basis in his or her Coast Guard-owned or -leased housing.

*Coast Guard family child care services* means child care provided on a regularly scheduled basis for 10 hours or more a week by an individual certified by the Coast Guard and who resides in Coast Guard-controlled housing.

*Command* means the Commanding Officer of one or more units of personnel in a limited geographic area with responsibility for a child development center.

*Family child care* means child care provided in the home of a provider, either a Coast Guard family child care provider or a family home day care provider.

*Family home day care provider* means an individual 18 years of age or older who is licensed by the state agency that regulates child care. This person provides child care to one but to no more than six children, including the provider's own children under the age of eight, on a regular basis in his or her residence.

*Geographic cost of living allowance* means the adjustment in basic pay related to higher living costs in certain geographic areas.

*Total family income* means the earned income for adult members of the household including wages, salaries, tips, long-term disability benefits received by a family, incentive and special pay for service or anything else of value, even if not taxable, that was received for providing services. Also included is Basic Allowance for Housing and Basic Allowance for Subsistence authorized for the pay grade of military personnel, whether the allowance is received in cash or in-kind. Total Family Income does not include: the geographic cost of living allowance; alimony and child support; temporary duty allowances or reimbursements for educational expenses; veterans benefits; workers compensation benefits; and, unemployment compensation. These are to be excluded from total family income.

*Uneconomical and inefficient* means that the fees collected from parents can not be used in a manner that provides a quality program at an affordable cost to parents using the child care services.
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|Name                               |  | State of Organization or Incorporation
|---------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                                  
|Digitas International Inc.         |  | Delaware Corporation                  
|                                  
|Digitas Netherlands Holding Inc.   |  | Delaware Corporation                  
|                                  
|BSH Holding LLC                    |  | Delaware Limited Liability Company    
|                                  
|Digitas LLC                        |  | Delaware Limited Liability Company    
|                                  
|Bronner Slosberg Humphrey Inc.     |  | Massachusetts Corporation             
|                                  
|Sansome Inc.                       |  | Massachusetts Corporation             
|                                  
|Digitas (Europe) Inc.              |  | Massachusetts Corporation             
|                                  
|Digitas Asia Ltd                   |  | Hong Kong Limited Company             
|                                  
|Digitas Cayman Island              |  | Cayman Island Limited                 
|                                  
|Digitas Europe (France) S.A.S.     |  | French S.A.S.                         
|                                  
|Digitas Europe (Ireland) Limited   |  | Irish Limited                         
|                                  
|Digitas Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
#### SAMUEL PHILIPS, Appellant, *v.*ELIZA WALKER and OTHERS.

*Foreclosure—referee's fees on sale in.*

Appeal from an order fixing the fees of the referee on a sale of mortgaged premises in the above entitled action. The property at the sale was bid off by plaintiff at $3,000. The referee retained, out of the ten per cent paid on the sum bid at the sale, the sum of $129.65 for his fees and charges, over and above disbursements.

The court, referring to chapter 192 of the Laws of 1814, amending chapter 569 of the Laws of 1869, say a very singular question of constitutionality might be raised upon the act of 1814; but it is not "necessary to pass upon it, because the appellant’s counsel says, in his points, he will be *“*quite content to have the fees of the referee taxed under this statute,” under which he was entitled to thirty dollars as the aggregate of the several items given by the act, besides his disbursements.

*646
      *A. C.*Thomas, for the appellant.

*E. J. Shandley,*referee, in person.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Daniels and Brady, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, and an order entered fixing the referee’s fees at thirty dollars and his disbursements, without costs.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walter S. Berman, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Walter S. Berman
-----------------------------------
Name:  Walter S. Berman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  August 14, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under
that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY **GENERAL** 6Ff%%I!3 AUSTIN

PlaInvIew, Texas Dear &II.Tibbete:

oertain offioiale in Hale County

estion, 

### weassume salary payments

vtsed that ur second qnsetion, you ara adk should afthhold the Viotorp alary payzmi3nta. The amountor r oent of the Wary paid by Hale the withholding deduction providFederal Aot. Eaohagenoy paying salary to the ofrioial is to be treated as an employer under the hot, and*hould withhold the tax from its payments. Thera Is no provision inEoaorable Xrneet Tlbbets -- p8@ e

.

the Aat for apgortlonlnfl the withholdi% deduotions khan the employee irrpai~dby ~xorethan one,erployar; oonsequently the full wlthhol4ln~ deduction f.nto be sllowed by caoh employer ir! omputinF the aAmount of salary jaid by It subject to the tar. Tbis,~ae are ll;formed, is the rule which is beicg applied by the Collmtora oi Internal Asvenue.

. Very truly yours ATTOIMm ~SiXZi&4L

OF'TEXAS A.X.Y.-LG? &lc10suw Approved J.an4, 1943 Gerald C. I- (a) Attorney Ganeral,~o~ Texae APPROYE!iOFIl'ZIOIZ

CQMPTIGE ByB.W.R. CFM?.ImAT4 (8) .~
## In **T he**  **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo**  No. 07 - 22 - 00318 - CV CHIMERE CRUMP , A PPELLANT V. WSBT LEWISVILLE LAND VIII LP, BY ITS AGENT BRIDGE TOWER PROPERTIES, LLC , APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No . CV - 2022 - 02821 - JP , Honorable Robert Ramirez , Presiding 

### March 29 , 2023 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant, Chimere Crump, proceeding pro se, appeal s from the trial court’ s judgment. 1 Crump’s brief was originally due February 21, 2023 , but was not filed. By letter of March 1, 2023 , we notified Crump that the appeal was subject to dismissal for

1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001.2 want of prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by March 13. To date, Crump ha s n either filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court
. Accordingly, we dismiss th is app eal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Per Curiam
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOTV Propulsion IssuesThe statistical technology needs of aero-assist maneuvering, propulsion, and usage of cryogenic fluids were presented. Industry panels discussed the servicing of reusable space based vehicles and propulsion-vehicle interation.Document ID19850008680Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsDate AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1984Subject CategoryLaunch Vehicles And Space VehiclesReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.55:2347NASA-CP-2347E-2171Accession Number85N16989Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850008680.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle19850008701WorkSpace based OTV servicing19850008684WorkPerformance assessment of aero-assisted orbital transfer vehicles19850008691WorkAdvanced OTV engines and issues19850008696WorkPropellant transfer:  Attached depot19850008683WorkSpace station task force perspective19850008690WorkAerojet advanced engine concept19850008682WorkShuttle/Centaur project perspective19850008699WorkVehicle/engine integration19850008681WorkNASA OAST perspective19850008700WorkOrbital transfer vehicle propulsion issues19850008698WorkOTV fluid mangement systems19850008689WorkDrives and benefits overview19850008694WorkPassive storage technologies19850008686WorkModerate lift-to-drag aeroassist19850008695WorkActive cooling requirements for propellant storage19850008693WorkEarth-to-orbit propellant transportation overview19850008697WorkPropellant transfer:  Tethered depot19850008688WorkOTV propulsion tecnology programmatic overview19850008685WorkLow lift-to-drag aero-assisted orbit transfer vehicles19850008692WorkAdvanced OTV engine concepts19850008687WorkBenefits of high aerodynamic efficiency to orbital transfer vehiclesvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 83.18 Responsibilities between vessels (Rule 18). Except where Rules 9, 10, and 13 (§§ 83.09, 83.10, and 83.13) otherwise require: ( a ) A power-driven vessel underway shall keep out of the way of: ( i ) A vessel not under command;
( ii ) A vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver;
( iii ) A vessel engaged in fishing;
( iv ) A sailing vessel.
( b ) A sailing vessel underway shall keep out of the way of: ( i ) A vessel not under command;
( ii ) A vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver; and
( iii ) A vessel engaged in fishing.
( c ) A vessel engaged in fishing when underway shall, so far as possible, keep out of the way of: ( i ) A vessel not under command; and
( ii ) A vessel restricted in her ability to maneuver.
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) A seaplane on the water shall, in general, keep well clear of all vessels and avoid impeding their navigation. In circumstances, however, where risk of collision exists, she shall comply with the Rules of this Subpart (Rules 4-19) (§§ 83.04 through 83.19); and
( f ) ( i ) a WIG craft shall, when taking off, landing and in flight near the surface, keep well clear of all other vessels and avoid impeding their navigation; and
( ii ) a WIG craft operating on the water surface shall comply with the Rules of this Subpart (Rules 4-19) (§§ 83.04 through 83.19) as a power-driven vessel.
[USCG-2012-0102, 79 FR 37912, July 2, 2014, as amended by USCG-2012-0102, 79 FR 68621, Nov. 18, 2014]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Shuttle orbiter trimmed center-of-gravity extension studyAerodynamic, heat transfer, and system design studies to determine removable modifications for the Space Shuttle orbiter that would extend its forward center-of-gravity triom capability are summarized. Wind-tunnel tests were conducted at Mach numbers ranging from 0.25 to 20.3 to determine the most effective aerodynamic modifications. Heat transfer and system design studies determined the impact of the modifications on the thermal protection system and structural weight of the vehicle. The most effective modifications were in-fillet canards or a forward extension of the existing forward wing fillet.Document ID19850010693Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsScallion, W. I.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Phillips, W. P.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategoryLaunch Vehicles And Space VehiclesReport/Patent NumberL-15701NAS 1.60:2284NASA-TP-2284Accession Number85N19003Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-51-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850010693.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JANUARY 31, 1998 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                             250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     9665
<ALLOWANCES>                                       800
<INVENTORY>                                     12,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,328
<PP&E>                                           8,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,646
<BONDS>                                          9,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,618
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           989
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,511)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,728
<SALES>                                         12,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,872
<CGS>                                            9,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (52)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,176)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,194)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
DENNIS A.DONET, P.A.

9100 South Dadeland Boulevard ! Suite 906 ! Miami, FL 33156 

Telephone: 305-670-0074 ! Fax: 305-670-0061 ! www.DonetLaw.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-23184-WPD 

 

KELLY LYLES, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AMERICAN ZURICH 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 

 

 Defendant. 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND NOTICE OF E-MAIL DESIGNATION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that DENNIS A. DONET, ESQ., of Dennis A. 

Donet, PA, hereby files this, his Notice of Appearance as Co-Counsel for Plaintiff, 

KELLY LYLES, in connection with any and all proceedings had in the abovestyled cause. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to Florida Rule of 

Judicial Administration 2.516, E-Mail addresses for service of all documents 

required or permitted to be served on all parties in this matter, are as follows: 

 Primary E-Mail: Dennis.Donet@Donetlaw.com 

 Secondary E-Mail: Vanessa.Ramirez@Donetlaw.com 

Case 1:22-cv-23184-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 1 of 2
Page | 2 

DENNIS A.DONET, P.A.

9100 South Dadeland Boulevard ! Suite 906 ! Miami, FL 33156 

Telephone: 305-670-0074 ! Fax: 305-670-0061 ! www.DonetLaw.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 14th day of November, 2022, the 

foregoing Notice of Appearance and Notice of E-Mail Designation was 

electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which 

will send notice of ECF to counsel of record as listed below:

Jason Michael Chodos, Esq. 

Christian Alexander Triay, Esq. 

Counsel for Defendant 

Zelle LLP 

One Southeast 3rd Avenue 

Suite 1600 

Miami, FL 33131 

Email: jchodos@zellelaw.com

Email: Ctriay@zellelaw.com 

Carlos Santi, Esq. 

Co-counsel for Plaintiff 

PROPERTY & CASUALTY LAW GROUP 

2307 Douglas Rd., Suite 302, Miami, FL 33145 

Telephone: (305) 961-1038 

Email: csanti@pclawgroup.com 

DENNIS A. DONET, P.A. 

 By: /s/ Dennis A. Donet 

DENNIS A. DONET, ESQ. 

 Florida Bar No.: 129569 

 Co-counsel for Plaintiff, KELLY LYLES

 9100 S. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 906 

 Miami, FL 33156 

Telephone: (305) 670-0074 

Fax: (305) 670-0061 

Email: dennis.donet@donetlaw.com 

Case 1:22-cv-23184-WPD Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2022 Page 2 of 2