alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.340 Safety Management Certificate: what is it and when is it needed? ( a ) Your U.S. vessel engaged on a foreign voyage must hold a valid Safety Management Certificate if it carries more than 12 passengers, or if it is a tanker, bulk freight vessel, freight vessel, or a self-propelled mobile offshore drilling unit of 500 gross tons or more.
( b ) Your U.S. vessel may voluntarily hold a valid Safety Management Certificate even if your vessel is not required to by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Your U.S. vessel may only be issued a Safety Management Certificate or have it renewed when your company holds a valid Document of Compliance certificate issued under § 96.330 of this part and the vessel has completed a satisfactory safety management audit of the vessel's safety management system set out in § 96.320 of this part.
( d ) A copy of your vessel's valid Safety Management Certificate must be on board all U.S. and foreign vessels which carry more than 12 passengers, and must be on board a tanker, bulk freight vessel, freight vessel, or a self-propelled mobile offshore drilling unit of 500 gross tons or more, when engaged on foreign voyages or within U.S. waters.
( e ) A Safety Management Certificate is valid for 60 months. The validity of the Safety Management Certificate is based on— ( 1 ) A satisfactory initial safety management audit;
( 2 ) A satisfactory intermediate verification audit requested by the vessel's responsible person, completed between the 24th and 36th month of the certificate's period of validity; and
( 3 ) A vessel's company holding a valid Document of Compliance certificate. When a company's Document of Compliance certificate expires or is revoked, the Safety Management Certificate for the company-owned vessel(s) is invalid.
( f ) Renewal of a Safety Management Certificate requires the completion of a satisfactory safety management system audit which meets all of the requirements of subpart B in this part. A renewal of a Safety Management Certificate cannot be started unless the company which owns the vessel holds a valid Document of Compliance certificate.
( g ) Only the Coast Guard may revoke a Safety Management Certificate from a U.S. vessel. The Safety Management Certificate will be revoked if— ( 1 ) The vessel's responsible person has not completed an intermediate safety management audit required by paragraph (e)(2) of this section; or
( 2 ) Major non-conformities are found in the vessel's safety management system during a safety management audit or other related survey or inspection being completed by the Coast Guard or the recognized organization chosen by the vessel's responsible person.
[CGD 95-073, 62 FR 67506, Dec. 24, 1997, as amended by USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34712, June 29, 1999]
§ 3011.104 Standard for public disclosure of materials claimed to contain non-public information. ( a ) In determining whether to publicly disclose materials claimed by the Postal Service to contain non-public information, the Commission shall balance the nature and extent of the likely commercial injury identified by the Postal Service against the public interest in maintaining the financial transparency of a government entity competing in commercial markets.
( b ) In determining whether to publicly disclose materials in which the Commission determines any person other than the Postal Service has a proprietary interest, the Commission shall balance the interests of the parties consistent with the analysis undertaken by a federal court when applying the protective conditions appearing in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c).
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Alberto Checa) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Alberto Checa.

Dated this 20th day of March 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 105 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/20/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 40.1 Program for appointing cadets.

The Coast Guard conducts a program for appointing qualified men and women as cadets who are admitted to the Coast Guard Academy, New London, Connecticut. The Superintendent of the Coast Guard Academy tenders appointments on the basis of previous academic performance, reported College Entrance Examination Board or American College Testing scores, and the findings of a Cadet Candidate Evaluation Board, consisting of Coast Guard officers appointed by the Superintendent of the Coast Guard Academy, which reviews each applicant's personal qualifications. In addition, a Service Academy Medical Examination must be satisfactorily completed before appointment. Applications must be submitted online at *http://www.uscga.edu* using Coast Guard forms CGA-14, CGA-14A, CGA-14B, CGA-14C, and CGA-14D. These forms, along with additional information on the Cadet appointment program, may be obtained from the Director of Admissions, U.S. Coast Guard Academy, New London, CT 06320.

[USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35002, June 19, 2008]
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1


Description of Agreement between Kishore Ponnavolu and MetLife, Inc. dated April 23, 2019
In December 2018, MetLife, Inc. asked Kishore Ponnavolu, its President, Asia, to travel from the U.S. to Japan on short notice to cover urgent business matters, including meetings with regulators.  Mr. Ponnavolu’s family joined him in Asia for this period.  On April 23, 2019 MetLife, Inc. agreed to reimburse Mr. Ponnavolu for his family travel expenses on this trip, at an incremental cost of approximately U.S. $75,000.  MetLife, Inc. will not make Mr. Ponnavolu whole for any of his taxes on this item.
EXHIBIT
      32.1


STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Thomas Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Thomas
      Kidrin


Thomas
      Kidrin


Chief
      Executive Officer








Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
AAM-11-358-E June 29, 2011

Exemption No. 10301 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0658

Ms. Catherine J. Mighell Out of the Blue Aviation, Inc.

18306 59 th Drive, N.E. Arlington, WA 98292

Dear Ms. Mighell:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated June 20, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Out of the Blue Aviation, Inc. (OBA ) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow OBA to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to OBA.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public inters and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Out of the Blue Aviation, Inc. an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow OBA to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation, subject to

the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Out of the Blue Aviation, Inc. are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the Out of the Blue Aviation, Inc. part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
#### § 76.10-1 Exemption.

Nothing in this part shall be construed to affect the regulations concerning the transfer of supplies, materials, equipment, or land between other Federal agencies.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 36398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[WI88-01-7319b; FRL-6706-4]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; 
Wisconsin; Site-Specific Revision for Uniroyal Engineered Products

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are proposing to approve a site specific revision to the 
volatile organic compound (VOC) control requirements for Uniroyal 
Engineered Products, Inc., located in Stoughton, Wisconsin. The 
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) submitted this State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision on October 30, 1999 and revised it 
on February 17, 2000. Our approval of this revision would make 
federally enforceable the State's February 7, 2000, Consent Order AM-
99-900, which establishes alternate control requirements for Uniroyal. 
In the final rules section of this Federal Register, we are approving 
the SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal, because 
we view this as a noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipate no 
adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in 
the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response 
to this action, no further activity is contemplated in relation to this 
proposed rule. If we receive adverse comments, we will withdraw the 
direct final rule and we will address all public comments received in a 
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. We will not 
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: We must receive written comments on this proposed action by July 
10, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: Carlton T. Nash, Chief, Regulation 
Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), EPA Region 5, 77 
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Regulation 
Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), EPA Region 5, 77 
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-1767.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, see the Direct 
Final notice which is located in the Rules section of this Federal 
Register. Copies of the request and the EPA's analysis are available 
for inspection at the above address. (Please telephone Kathleen 
D'Agostino at (312) 886-1767 before visiting the Region 5 Office.)

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 12, 2000.
Robert Springer,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 00-14176 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-80153-CR-CANNON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JUAN PABLO MONTEJO,

Defendant.

/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation entered by 

Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart Following Change of Plea Hearing [ECF No. 19]. On October

25, 2022, Magistrate Judge Reinhart held a Change of Plea hearing [ECF No. 17] during which 

Defendant pled guilty to the sole count of the Indictment [ECF No. 12]. The Government proffered 

a factual basis for the plea, and Defendant agreed that the Government’s proffer was true and 

correct. Magistrate Judge Reinhart thereafter issued a Report recommending that the Court accept 

Defendant’s guilty plea to the sole count in the Indictment, that the Court find Defendant to have 

freely and voluntarily entered his guilty plea, and that the Court adjudicate him guilty of the sole 

count in the Indictment [ECF No. 12]. No party has filed objections to the Report, and the time to 

do so has expired. 

The Court has conducted a review of the record and finds no error in the Report. Therefore, 

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The guilty plea entered by Defendant Juan Pablo Montejo as to the sole count of the 

Case 9:22-cr-80153-AMC Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2022 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-80153-CR-CANNON

Indictment is ACCEPTED.

3. Defendant Juan Pablo Montejo is adjudicated guilty of count one of the Indictment, 

which charges him with illegal reentry into the United States after removal, in violation 

of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1). 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 9th day of November

2022.

________________________________

AILEEN M. CANNON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cr-80153-AMC Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/10/2022 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACMAT Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael P. Cifone,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

         /s/ Michael P. Cifone

         Michael P. Cifone
         Chief Financial Officer
         November 14, 2003
#### §§ 111.4-111.5 [Reserved]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Anto nio, Texas** 

April 12, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00168

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF J. E. R

- P

,

From the County Court At Law No 1

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021JV1000086L1 Honorable Hugo Martinez , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from an order waiving jurisdiction of the juvenile court and transferring the juvenile to criminal district court. The court reporter has filed a notification of late record, requesting an extension to April 29, 2022. We GRANT the court reporter an extension and ORDER the reporter’s record to be filed by April 29, 2022.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of April, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
§ 166.105 Definitions. ( a ) Shipping safety fairway or fairway means a lane or corridor in which no artificial island or fixed structure, whether temporary or permanent, will be permitted. Temporary underwater obstacles may be permitted under certain conditions described for specific areas in Subpart B. Aids to navigation approved by the U.S. Coast Guard may be established in a fairway.
( b ) *Fairway anchorage* means an anchorage area contiguous to and associated with a fairway, in which fixed structures may be permitted within certain spacing limitations, as described for specific areas in Subpart B.
[CGD 81-80a, 48 FR 30110, June 30, 1983]
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 427I |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6219 ta' Diċembru 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 427I

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6219 ta' Diċembru 2019

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Avviżi |
| | PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI |
| | Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Sejħa għall-applikazzjonijiet għall-Premju Jan Amos Comenius għal tagħlim ta’ kwalità għolja dwar l-Unjoni Ewropea | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

V   Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea

2019/C 427 I/01

Sejħa għall-applikazzjonijiet għall-Premju Jan Amos Comenius għal tagħlim ta’ kwalità għolja dwar l-Unjoni Ewropea

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

V Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea

| 19.12.2019 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CI 427/1

---

Sejħa għall-applikazzjonijiet

għall-“Premju Jan Amos Comenius għal tagħlim ta’ kwalità għolja dwar l-Unjoni Ewropea”

(2019/C 427 I/01)

Id-Direttorat Ġenerali għall-Edukazzjoni, iż-Żgħażagħ, l-Isport u l-Kultura tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea nieda Sejħa għall-Applikazzjonijiet għall-“Premju Jan Amos Comenius għal tagħlim ta’ kwalità għolja dwar l-Unjoni Ewropea” tal-Unjoni Ewropea.

Il-premju se jirrikonoxxi l-iskejjel sekondarji li jgħinu lill-istudenti tagħhom jitgħallmu dwar l-Unjoni Ewropea b’modi li jispirawhom. Dan il-premju se jipprovdi rikonoxximent u viżibbiltà madwar l-UE għal ħidma rilevanti f’kull Stat Membru u se jenfasizza l-importanza tat-tagħlim u l-edukazzjoni dwar l-UE f’età żgħira. Se juri metodi ta’ tagħlim innovattivi li jinvolvu lill-istudenti b’mod attiv fl-edukazzjoni dwar l-UE u se jgħin fit-tixrid ta’ dawn il-prattiki.

Is-sejħa hija miftuħa għall-iskejjel sekondarji (il-livell ISCED 2 u l-livell ISCED 3) stabbiliti u bbażati fl-Unjoni Ewropea (mhux għall-għalliema).

Din il-kompetizzjoni se tagħti sa tmienja u għoxrin premju (28) ta’ EUR 8 000 kull wieħed, premju wieħed għal kull Stat Membru tal-UE

Jekk ir-Renju Unit joħroġ mill-Unjoni Ewropea qabel ma tittieħed id-deċiżjoni ta’ aġġudikazzjoni mill-Kummissjoni Ewropea (din tiġi ftit wara l-valutazzjoni tal-applikazzjonijiet) mingħajr ftehim li jiżgura li l-applikanti mir-Renju Unit jibqgħu eliġibbli, l-iskejjel tar-Renju Unit ma jibqgħux eliġibbli għal dan il-premju. F’dan il-każ, in-numru massimu ta’ premji se jkun 27 (minflok 28) iżda l-ammont għal kull premju jibqa’ l-istess (EUR 8 000).

Id-data tal-iskadenza għall-applikazzjonijiet hija l-Ħamis, is-6 ta’ Frar 2020 fil-17:00 CET.

L-informazzjoni rilevanti u l-formoli tal-applikazzjoni jinsabu kollha fuq:

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_mt

---