alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 18

                                       16

<PAGE>


Board of Directors
Agway, Inc.
333 Butternut Drive
DeWitt, New York 13214


We are  providing  this letter to you for  inclusion  as an exhibit to your Form
10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have read  management's  justification  for the change in  accounting  method
related to the  calculation  of the market  related value of pension  assets for
purposes of  estimating  the return on those assets  contained in the  Company's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997.  Based on our reading of the
data and  discussion  with Company  officials  about the business  judgement and
business  planning  factors  relating  to the  change,  we believe  management's
justification   is  reasonable.   Accordingly,   in  reliance  on   management's
determination as regards elements of judgement and business  planning, we concur
that the  newly  adopted  accounting  principle  described  above is preferable
in the Company's circumstances to the method previously applied.

We have not audited any financial  statements  of Agway,  Inc. as of any date or
any period  subsequent to June 30, 1997, nor have we audited the  application of
the change in accounting principle disclosed in Form 10-Q of Agway, Inc. for the
three months ended September 30, 1997; accordingly,  our comments are subject to
revision on completion of an audit of the financial  statements that include the
accounting change.



COOPERS & LYBRAND
Syracuse, New York
October 28, 1997

                                       17
Exhibit 10.09

            ADDENDUM 4 TO THE BEAVON EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF 8-01-02


         The following are amendments to the Elaine Beavon Employment Agreement
with SCHIMATIC Cash Transactions Network.com, Inc. dba Smart Chip Technologies
("Company", "SCTN" or "Employer") effective 8-01-02 as amended by Addendums on
7-28-03, 5-05-2004 and July 7, 2004.

         This Addendum to the employment agreement is to be effective as of July
1, 2004.

         For the purpose of cleaning up the "financial and stock overhang" of
the Company, as dictated by the Board of Directors, the Company and Beavon agree
to the following regarding Salary and Expenses:

         1.     Under her employment agreement Elaine Beavon earned a salary
                of $7,000 per month, payable 60% per month and 40% deferred
                until the Company was able to pay. Beavon hereby gives up her
                right to the 40% deferred portion of that salary, reducing her
                monthly salary to $4,200, until the Company is financially
                liquid enough to permit a reasonable salary consistent with
                industry standards.

         2.     Beavon and the Company hereby agree that expense reimbursement
                payments made to Beavon through this date will be considered
                settlement in full of any and all business expenses paid by
                Beavon through June 30, 2004. Expenses incurred by Beavon from
                July 1, 2004 and thereafter will be reimbursed by the Company
                within 30 days from the date submitted, providing the Company
                is financially able to make the payment.


I HAVE READ THIS AGREEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY, I UNDERSTAND ITS TERMS, AND AGREE TO
BE BOUND BY ALL OF ITS TERMS. I ALSO UNDERSTAND I HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE THIS
AGREEMENT REVIEWED BY INDEPENDENT COUNSEL.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on October
6, 2004.

Employer:                                                Employee:
SCTN                                                     Elaine Beavon
330 E. Warm Springs Rd.                                  2859 E. Wasatch Blvd.
Las Vegas, NV  89119                                     Sandy, UT  84092


  By: /s/ Bernard McHale                                 By:/s/ Elaine Beavon
      ------------------                                    -----------------
      Bernard McHale, Director                              Elaine Beavon


  By: /s/ Joseph E. Diamond
      ---------------------
      Joseph E. Diamond, Vice President and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               9
<MULTIPLIER>                              1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,905,782
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   904,417
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    157,152,101 
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           157,152,101
<LOANS>                                        280,247,511
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,555,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 467,877,608
<DEPOSITS>                                     335,570,189
<SHORT-TERM>                                    93,166,616
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,751,115
<LONG-TERM>                                        930,835
<COMMON>                                         7,824,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,634,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 467,877,608
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,131,933
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,468,379
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    71,117
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,671,429
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,179,451
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,373,910
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,297,519
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                            0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,272,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,727,403
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,085,442
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,085,442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        0400
<LOANS-NON>                                        493,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,095,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   626,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                         0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                            0
<RECOVERIES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0
§ 263.3 Responsibility. ( a ) *Records Office.* Records Office has the responsibility for providing for the establishment of retention schedules and has the authority to approve them. Furthermore, that office has the authority to dispose of Postal Service records by transfer or destruction.
( b ) *Custodians.* Custodians are responsible for the retention and prompt disposal of records in their custody and for delegating in writing, persons to perform these duties.
[40 FR 45722, Oct. 2, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 57344, Nov. 15, 1995; 64 FR 41290, July 30, 1999; 68 FR 56558, Oct. 1, 2003]
#### § 72.01-1 Purpose.

The Coast Guard issues information concerning the establishment of aids to maritime navigation and the changes, discontinuances, and deficiencies, except temporary deficiencies that are easily correctable, of aids to maritime navigation maintained and operated by or under the authority of the Coast Guard in documents and marine broadcasts having the general title of “Notice to Mariners.” This subpart describes the publications and the marine broadcasts.

[CGD 70-147R, 37 FR 10669, May 26, 1972]
EXHIBIT “2”

Case 0:22-cv-61548-RKA Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN ADMIRALTY

CASE NO.: 0:22-cv-61548-RKA

BROWARD SHIPYARD, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

M/Y SMILING DOG, a 1991 model 105-foot

Chediek motor yacht registered in the

Cayman Islands as Official Number 748072, 

its engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, and 

appurtenances, including a 17-foot Boston Whaler

tender, in rem, and SMILING DOG LTD., 

a Cayman Islands company, in personam,

Defendants.

____________________________________________/

WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM

TO THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

The Verified Complaint [ECF No. 1][ in the above styled in rem proceeding 

was filed by Plaintiff, Broward Shipyard, Inc., on August 19, 2022. In accordance 

with Supplemental Rule (C) for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Southern District of Florida Local Admiralty 

Rule C, you are directed to arrest the in rem Defendant Vessel, M/Y Smiling Dog, a 

1991 105-foot Chediek Motor Yacht registered in the Cayman Islands as Official 

Number 748072, its engines, tackle, furniture, furnishings, and appurtenances,

Case 0:22-cv-61548-RKA Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 2 of 3
2

including a 17-foot Boston Whaler tender, and detain the Vessel and its tender in 

your custody pending further Order of the Court. You shall also give notice of the 

arrest to all persons required by the appropriate Supplemental Rule, Local Admiralty 

Rule, and the practices of your office.

ORDERED at Miami, Florida, this ______ day of August, 2022.

ANGELA E. NOBLE

As Clerk of the Court

By:_________________________________

As Deputy Clerk

Copy furnished to:

Farris J. Martin III, Esq.

James W. Stroup, Esq.

Stroup & Martin, P.A.

119 S.E. 12th Street

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316

fmartin@strouplaw.com

jstroup@strouplaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Broward Shipyard, Inc.

Case 0:22-cv-61548-RKA Document 6-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 3 of 3
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/01 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALASKA
AIRLINES, INC. FIRST QUARTER 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         125,400
<SECURITIES>                                   147,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,600
<PP&E>                                       1,841,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 471,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,037,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          813,500
<BONDS>                                        300,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     662,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,037,200
<SALES>                                        394,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               394,300
<CGS>                                          406,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  406,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50107

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FABIAN FUENTES-VALDIVA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:08-CR-2744-1

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Fabian Fuentes-Valdiva appeals the 46-month sentence imposed following

his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. He asserts that the illegal

reentry Guidelines double count a defendant’s criminal record, resulting in a

sentencing range that is greater than necessary to meet the goals of 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). He also argues that the guidelines range for his sentence was too

severe because it failed to reflect that his offense is not evil or a crime of violence

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-50107

2

and because it failed to consider that the reason he came back to the United

States was to find work to support his son.

We have rejected the argument that using a prior conviction to increase

the offense level and in calculating criminal history is impermissible “double

counting.” See United States v. Calbat, 266 F.3d 358, 364 (5th Cir. 2001).

Moreover, Fuentes-Valdiva has not rebutted the presumption that the district

court sentenced him to a reasonable and properly calculated within-guidelines

sentence. See United States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 338 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 328 (2008); United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554-55

(5th Cir. 2006). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**






In
      connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 of AMERCO
      (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      February 8, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Jason A. Berg, Chief Accounting Officer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      that:


(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




AMERCO,


a
      Nevada
      corporation


/s/
      Jason A. Berg


Jason
      A.
      Berg


Chief
      Accounting Officer


Date:
      February 7, 2007
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Meteortrains**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:3/8
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001061034
 
June 15, 2018
#### § 173.83 Availability of Coast Guard forms.

In a State where the Coast Guard is the issuing authority, forms required by § 173.81 are available at all manned Coast Guard shore units, except light and loran stations and except for Form CG-3865, at all first- and second-class and some third- and fourth-class post offices.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5181

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals a refundable credit against income tax for the purchase of computer software

that filters child pornography and material that is violent, obscene, or

harmful to minors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 14, 2000

Mr. BOSWELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals a refundable credit against income tax for the

purchase of computer software that filters child pornography and material that is violent, obscene, or harmful

to minors.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet Child Safety

5 Tax Credit Act’’.
2

•HR 5181 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE

2 TO FILTER MATERIAL HARMFUL TO CHIL3 DREN.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart C of part IV of sub5 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of

6 1986 (relating to refundable credits) is amended by redes7 ignating section 35 as section 36 and by inserting after

8 section 34 the following new section:

9 ‘‘SEC. 35. COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO FILTER MATERIAL

10 HARMFUL TO CHILDREN.

11 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual,

12 there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed

13 by this subtitle an amount equal to the purchase price of

14 computer software that filters or blocks, when accessing

15 the Internet—

16 ‘‘(1) child pornography,

17 ‘‘(2) material harmful to minors, and

18 ‘‘(3) material that is violent or obscene.

19 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—The credit allowed by this section

20 for any taxable year shall not exceed $100.

21 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—

22 ‘‘(1) CHILD PORNOGRAPHY.—The term ‘child

23 pornography’ has the meaning given such term in

24 section 2256(8) of title 18, United States Code.

25 ‘‘(2) MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS.—The

26 term ‘material harmful to minors’ has the meaning
3

•HR 5181 IH

1 given such term in section 231(e)(6) of the Commu2 nications Act of 1934.

3 ‘‘(3) MINOR.—The term ‘minor’ has the mean4 ing given such term in section 2256(1) of title 18,

5 United States Code.’’.

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

7 (1) Paragraph (2) of section 1324(b) of title

8 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting be9 fore the period ‘‘, or from section 35 of such Code’’.

10 (2) The table of sections for subpart C of part

11 IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is

12 amended by striking the last item and inserting the

13 following new items:

‘‘Sec. 35. Computer software to filter material harmful to children.

‘‘Sec. 36. Overpayments of tax.’’.

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

16 December 31, 2000.

Æ
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ELIZABETH D. LEWIS,
Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1413

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 20

- 933, Judge Scott Laurer.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER

, Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant

- appella nt.

G ALINA I. F OMENKOVA

, Commercial Litigation Branch,Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by S OSUN B AE

, B RIAN M. B OYNTON

, W ILLIAM J AMES G RIMALDI

, P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY ; C HRISTINA L YNN G REGG

, Y. K EN L EE , Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs

, Washington, DC. Case: 22-1413 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2023______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (D YK
, B RYSON

, and S TARK

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 9, 2023
Date /s/ Jar r ett B. Perlow
Jar rett B. Perlow Acting Clerk of Court Case: 22-1413 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 06/09/2023
§ 83.13 Overtaking (Rule 13). ( a ) Notwithstanding anything contained in Rules 4 through 18 (§§ 83.04 through 83.18), any vessel overtaking any other shall keep out of the way of the vessel being overtaken.
( b ) A vessel shall be deemed to be overtaking when coming up with another vessel from a direction more than 22.5 degrees abaft her beam; that is, in such a position with reference to the vessel she is overtaking, that at night she would be able to see only the sternlight of that vessel but neither of her sidelights.
( c ) When a vessel is in any doubt as to whether she is overtaking another, she shall assume that this is the case and act accordingly.
( d ) Any subsequent alteration of the bearing between the two vessels shall not make the overtaking vessel a crossing vessel within the meaning of these Rules or relieve her of the duty of keeping clear of the overtaken vessel until she is finally past and clear.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Highway concrete pavementtechnology development and testing [electronic resource].**
 
pt1|pt2|pt3|pt4|pt5
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:02-082, TD 2.30:02-083, TD 2.30:02-084, TD 2.30:02-085, TD 2.30:02-086

Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001063002
 
July 18, 2018
§ 84.01 Definitions. ( a ) The term *height above the hull* means height above the uppermost continuous deck. This height shall be measured from the position vertically beneath the location of the light.
( b ) *High-speed craft* means a craft capable of maximum speed in meters per second (m/s) equal to or exceeding: 3.7▽0.1667; where ▽ = displacement corresponding to the design waterline (cubic meters). Note to paragraph ( b
):
The same formula expressed in pounds and knots is maximum speed in knots (kts) equal to exceeding 1.98 (lbs) 3.7▽0.1667; where ▽ = displacement corresponding to design waterline in pounds.
( c ) The term *practical cut-off* means, for vessels 20 meters or more in length, 12.5 percent of the minimum luminous intensity (Table 84.14(b)) corresponding to the greatest range of visibility for which the requirements of Annex I (33 CFR part 84) are met.
( d ) The term *Rule* or *Rules* has the same meaning as in 33 CFR 83.03(r).
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001146 20-NOV-2015 08:42 AM