alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Design and construction ofmechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes [electronicresource].**
PDF-v.1|
PDF-v.2| 
 
 
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30/15:10-024; TD 2.30/15:10-025

Item Number: 0982-G-29 (online)

CGP systemNumber: 001064624
September 20, 2018
#### § 183.715 Exception.

Outboard motors designed to be equipped for remote starting, but which also have a provision for local starting in emergencies, need not comply with § 183.710 for their local starting system. However, the following information must be displayed on the motor: “Warning—Ensure shift control is in neutral before starting motor”. This information must be clearly visible to a person using the emergency starting device.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40161

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RICHARD JOHN CAVERLY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 524

Filed: June 5, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Cassia

County. Hon. Jonathan P. Brody, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of two years, for felony driving under the influence of 

alcohol, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Richard John Caverly was convicted of felony driving under the influence of alcohol, 

Idaho Code § 18-8004. The district court sentenced Caverly to a unified term of ten years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of two years. Caverly appeals, contending that his sentence is 

excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Caverly’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### Harbin *v.*The State.

Submitted November 19,

Decided December 12, 1906.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Reagan. Pike superior court. June *2,*1906.

*E. F. Dupree*and *J. 8. James,*for plaintiff in error.

*O. H. B. Bloodworth, solicitor-general,*and *J. F. Bedding,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

1. When an accused is convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of an unlawful act, the judgment will not be reversed for the reason that the judge failed to charge upon the law of voluntary manslaughter, even though the evidence might hav.e warranted an instruction upon this subject.

2. If there was any error in any of the rulings which were the subjects of the assignments of error, the error is not so prejudicial in its nature as to require a, reversal of the judgment.

3. While there was evidence which might have authorized a verdict for an offense of a higher grade than that of which the accused was convicted, there is evidence authorizing the verdict as rendered, and no sufficient reason has been shown for reversing the judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**Exhibit 31(a)**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Alan R. Abrams, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Servidyne, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         Date: September 14, 2007    /s/ Alan R. Abrams         Alan R. Abrams        Chief Executive Officer
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff, COLLECTIVE ACTION 

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Dalianny Mandiarote) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Dalianny Mandiarote.

Dated this 24th day of July 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 170 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2023 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5134 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5134

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 219 South Church Street in Odum, Georgia, as the ``Ruth Coleman Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2000

 Mr. Kingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 219 South Church Street in Odum, Georgia, as the ``Ruth Coleman Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RUTH COLEMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 219 South Church Street in Odum, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Ruth Coleman Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ruth 
Coleman Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-19-00128-CR

JIMMY WAYNE CARR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 27810

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After David Bell, Ph.D., testified that Jimmy Wayne Carr was competent to stand trial, the 

trial court found Carr guilty of assault on a public servant and sentenced him to eight years’ 

confinement.1 This case was tried with eleven companion cases, which are the subject of other 

appeals pending before this Court. In this appeal, Carr contends (1) that, since Bell’s qualifications 

do not appear in his report, there was insufficient evidence to find him competent to stand trial and 

(2) that the judgment should be modified to reflect a conviction under Section 43.26(d) of the 

Texas Penal Code. 

The argument raised in Carr’s first issue is based exclusively on the argument brought 

before this Court in the companion appeal styled Carr v. State, cause number 06-19-00126-CR. 

In our opinion of this date disposing of that appeal, we found that Carr did not preserve that issue 

for appeal. For the reasons set out in that opinion, we overrule Carr’s first issue as it applies to 

this appeal.

In his second issue, Carr asserts that the judgment of conviction should be modified to 

reflect a conviction under Section 43.26(d) of the Texas Penal Code. The original judgment of 

conviction recites that the statute for Carr’s conviction offense was Section 43.26(a) of the Texas 

Penal Code. Carr argues that this was error and that the proper statute was Section 43.26(d) of the 

Texas Penal Code. 

After Carr filed his brief in this Court, the trial court entered a Nunc Pro Tunc Judgment 

of Conviction that recited that the statute for offense was Section 43.26(d) of the Texas Penal 

 1

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b)(1) (Supp.).
3

Code. Clerical errors in a judgment may be corrected by a nunc pro tunc judgment. Ex parte Poe, 

751 S.W.2d 873, 876 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Errors that do not result from judicial reasoning or 

determination are clerical errors. Id.

We may not decide moot controversies. See Ex parte Flores, 130 S.W.3d 100, 104–05 

(Tex. App.—El Paso 2003, pet. ref’d). “A case becomes moot on appeal when the judgment of 

the appellate court can no longer have an effect on an existing controversy or cannot affect the 

rights of the parties.” Jack v. State, 149 S.W.3d 119, 123 n.10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (per curiam) 

(citing VE Corp. v. Ernst & Young, 860 S.W.2d 83, 84 (Tex. 1993) (per curiam)). 

The trial court’s nunc pro tunc judgment provides Carr with all the relief he has requested 

in this issue. Thus, any judgment of this Court can have no effect on the rights of the parties. 

Consequently, this issue is moot. We overrule Carr’s second issue.

For the reasons stated, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: December 30, 2019

Date Decided: January 9, 2020

Do Not Publish
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-30631

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODERICK WASHINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:08-CR-188-4

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roderick Washington appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for 

a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court 

originally sentenced Washington to 126 months of imprisonment after he 

pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or 

more of cocaine base. Following Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines, 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 12, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-30631 Document: 00513833273 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/12/2017
No. 16-30631

2

the district court denied Washington’s motion for a reduction to 120 months of 

imprisonment.

We review a district court’s decision whether to reduce a sentence under 

§ 3582(c)(2) for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Henderson, 636 F.3d 

713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011). If the district court bases its decision on an error of 

law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence, it commits an abuse of 

discretion. Id. The district court does not abuse its discretion when the record 

shows that the court duly considered the motion as a whole and considered the 

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, even implicitly. United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d 

1007, 1010 (5th Cir. 1995).

The parties agree that Washington was eligible for a reduction. 

However, they dispute whether the court’s denial was an abuse of discretion. 

In this case, the court specifically stated that it considered the § 3553(a)

sentencing factors and “all of the information submitted,” including 

Washington’s presentence report. To the extent Washington argues that the 

court did not provide adequate reasons for its denial, “a court is not required 

to state findings of facts and conclusion[s] of law when denying a § 3582(c)(2) 

motion.” United States v. Cooley, 590 F.3d 293, 298 (5th Cir. 2009) (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted). Because the record reveals that the 

district court gave due consideration to the motion as a whole and to the 

§ 3553(a) factors, it did not abuse its discretion. See Whitebird, 55 F.3d at 1010.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-30631 Document: 00513833273 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/12/2017
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bradley D. Tilden, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                      
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                        | 
|By                      |  | /S/ Bradley D. Tilden
|Bradley D. Tilden      
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 8, 2008
Merrimack

No. 78-080

#### Robert W. Hunneyman v. Theresa H. Hunneyman

September 27, 1978

*Wiggin & Nourie,*of Manchester (L. *Jonathan Ross*orally), for the plaintiff.

*McSwiney, Jones & Semple,*of Concord *(Carroll F. Jones*orally), for the defendant.

Memorandum Opinion

The question in this divorce case is whether the trial court abused its discretion in not awarding alimony; in reducing the amount of child support payments from that awarded on a temporary basis; and in dividing the parties’ property. The defendant contends that the Master’s *(Robert A. Carignan,*Esq.) findings and rulings were inconsistent with his report. We hold that there was no abuse of discretion and overrule the defendant’s exceptions.

“In resolving this question we are mindful of the continuity of decisional law allocating broad discretion to the trial court in de*653termining matters of property settlement, alimony, and divorce.” *Economides v. Economides,*116 N.H. 191, 193, 357 A.2d 871, 872 (1976). “Defendant has the burden of showing that the orders were ‘improper and unfair.’ ” *Adams v. Adams,*117 N.H. 43, 44, 369 A.2d 196, 197 (1977).

There is no transcript in this case, and a review of the record before us shows no inconsistency between findings and rulings and the report; further, there are revealed no errors of law. We therefore cannot say that the court abused its discretion with regard to the support order and the division of property.

*Exceptions overruled.*

DOUGLAS and BROCK, JJ., did not sit.
#### § 20.2 Effective date of the International Mail Manual.

The provisions of the *International Mail Manual* issued January 21, 2024 (incorporated by reference, see § 20.1), are applicable with respect to the international mail services of the Postal Service.

[89 FR 15474, Mar. 4, 2024]
**Exhibit 32(f)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Southern Power Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/Ronnie L. Bates

Ronnie L. Bates

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Michael W. Southern

Michael W. Southern

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

     |

 

 

Date:  August 6, 2007
UN I VI.KS n Y o f



# _ - FLORID A ,.,...„,, . Divisiono f Multimedi a Propertie s i.,.A'>.- J ,x'7 , 320 0 Weime rHal t . ; >^i-JH. ! AliQ:', ' Post Offic e Bo

x 11840 5 t'i;..^' M li/iV o Gainesville , Florid a 32611-840 5 ^ ' V l A if : 3 1 Augus t 17 , 20J 0 Aloli aLe y Associate Dii-ecto

r Smai l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developniej K

Progra m(SCASDP ) aloliH.ley@dot.go v Re : Smal l CoimtmtiU

y A h Servic e Developmen t Gran t Dea r Ms . Aloho , Th e Universit

y o f Florid aDivisio n o f

Multimedi aPropertie s fiMl y support s Hi

e Gainesville-Alachu aCount y Regiona l Airpor t Authority' s reques t

fo r aSmal l Communit

y Ai r Seivic e Development

grant t o help suppor

t tli e new America

n Eagl e Airline s servic e between Gainesvill e an d Miam i an d th e existin g loca

l ai r carriers , Delt aAi

r Line s and US Airways . W e lecogm'z e tfi

e importanc e o f

air " servic e t

o economi c developmen t

an d (lie quality o f lif e fo r resident s an

d visitor s i

n ou r regioti . W e wan t t o help ensur e th e succes s o f th e new America

n Aiiline s servic e betwee n Gainesvill e an d th e Miam

i hub . W e ar e already workin g closel y wit h th e Airpor

t Authority and matchin g fund s spent . Th e lac k o f ai r servic e t o Sout h Florid aan d adequat e connectin g servic e t o international destination s ha s forced man y t o commute t

o an d fro mother airport s o r

mak e th e exhaustin g 5 + hou r tri p t o Miam

i b y automobile . Additionally , American' s extensiv e domesti c and international rout e structure fio

mMiam i wil l provid e ne w trave l option s an d agreater level o f frequency . Du e t o th e critical importanc e o f qualit y air servic e fo

r our region , w e are committe d t o supportin g American' s ne w servic e and continue d improvement i n ai r service . Therefore , w e ar e niatchin g fund s spen

t on WUFT

FM/WJUF-F

M t o hel p American Airline s establis h it s ne w rout e bet^vee n GN V an d MIA . W

e will als o consider " matchin g fund s on our

othe r propertie s a s well . Wit

h th e stron g cor e audienc e tha t listen s t o WUFT-FM/WJUF

F M (a n NP R affiliate ) on adail y basis , w e believ e oir

r grant/donatio n fo

r underwritin g announcement s wil l help mak e th e ne w sei-vic e successful . J urg e yo u t o procee d wil h approvin g th e Airpor

t Authority' s reques t

fo r agran t t o assis t wit h jnarketin g effort s fo r th e nex t tw o years . I

f yo u hav e any question s abou t th e Universit

y o f Florid aDivisio n o f

Multimedi a Properties , pleas e fee

l fre e t o contac t m e a t 352-392-0771 , Ext . 2101 . Sincerely , 

## 1 ^

v- i Sandy Wagnei " Dii-ector " o f Revenu e Universit y o f Flor'ida Divisio n o f

Multimedi aPropertie s

Pag e 6 5