alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4903 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4903

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to strengthen the limitation on 
 holding and transfer of broadcast licenses to foreign persons, and to 
      apply a similar limitation to holding and transfer of other 
       telecommunications entities by or to foreign governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2000

Mr. Dingell (for himself and Mr. Markey) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to strengthen the limitation on 
 holding and transfer of broadcast licenses to foreign persons, and to 
      apply a similar limitation to holding and transfer of other 
       telecommunications entities by or to foreign governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

        This Act may be cited as the ``Foreign Government Investment 
Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. FOREIGN GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENTITIES.

    Section 310 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 301) is 
amended by adding at the end thereof the following:
    ``(f) Limitations on Foreign Government Ownership of 
Telecommunications Entities Licensed by the FCC--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this Act or any other law to the contrary, no license, permit, 
        or operating authority under this Act may be granted to or held 
        by a corporation, joint venture, partnership, other business 
        organization, or trust directly or indirectly controlled by a 
        foreign government or its representatives.
            ``(2) Prohibition absolute.--The Commission may not waive 
        the application of paragraph (1) under any other authority 
        granted to the Commission under this or any other Act or under 
        any Commission order or rule.
            ``(3) Test of control.--A corporation or other entity 
        described in paragraph (1) shall be considered to be controlled 
        by a foreign government or its representatives if more than 25 
        percent of the ownership, voting rights, capital stock, or 
        other pecuniary interest in that entity is owned, held, or 
        controlled, directly or indirectly, by a foreign government or 
        its representatives.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 62.32 Inland waters obstruction mark. ( a ) On inland waters designated by the Commandant as State waters in accordance with § 66.05-5 of this chapter and on non-navigable internal waters of a State which have no defined head of navigation, a buoy showing alternate vertical black and white stripes may be used to indicate to a vessel operator that an obstruction to navigation extends from the nearest shore to the buoy.
( b ) The black and white buoy's meaning is “do not pass between the buoy and the shore”. The number of white and black stripes is discretionary, provided that the white stripes are twice the width of the black stripes. Prior to December 31, 2003, this aid shall not be used on a waterway which has a red and white striped obstruction marker defined in § 66.10-15(e)(3) of this chapter, unless all obstruction markers are replaced.
[CGD 97-018, 63 FR 33573, June 19, 1998]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                           1,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (413)
<INVENTORY>                                     12,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,488
<PP&E>                                          15,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,615
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,948)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,329
<SALES>                                         81,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                81,723
<CGS>                                           61,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    236
<INCOME-TAX>                                        90
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                146
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       146
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-76,722 & AP-76,723

EX PARTE WARDELL HUNTER, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 114-1689-08 & 114-0315-09

IN THE 114 DISTRICT COURT FROM SMITH COUNTY

TH

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was twice convicted of

assault with bodily injury to a family member and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment for each

cause. 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal. His counsel has submitted an

affidavit to the trial court stating that he was appointed to represent Applicant on appeal, but was not

timely notified of that appointment and therefore was unable to file a timely notice of appeal. Ex
2

parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

The trial court has determined that Applicant was denied his right to appeal these judgments. 

We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time appeals of the judgments of

convictions in Cause Nos. 114-1689-08 & 114-0315-09 from the 114 Judicial District Court of th

Smith County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of

appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of

the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If

Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately

appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if

the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that,

should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice

of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: February 8, 2012

Do Not Publish
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

Dec 9, 2014

The Honorable Randy C. Huffman

Cabinet Secretary, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection

601 57th Street SE 

Charleston, West Virginia 25304

Dear Secretary Huffman:

On September 29, 2014, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the West Virginia Department of Environmental 

Protection (DEP) pertaining to the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 128 (State Boards) for 

all National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) pollutants and to satisfy the state’s obligations 

under the CAA section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the following NAAQS: 1997 ozone NAAQS, 2008 ozone 

NAAQS, 2010 nitrogen dioxide NAAQS, 2010 sulfur dioxide NAAQS, 1997 particulate matter 

NAAQS, and 2006 particulate matter NAAQS. EPA has determined that this submittal is

administratively and technically complete. 

EPA will be reviewing the revision and will prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) 

action. If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ellen Schmitt, Office 

of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-5787. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

David Arnold, Acting Director

Air Protection Division 

cc: Mr. Fred Durham, Director, Division of Air Quality, WVDEP
### A contribution to the structural history of the Vidal-Parker region, California and Arizona

By: W. J. CarrD.D. Dickey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1430

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Applies to ACL’s SHIP grantees’ sub-contracts and sub-grants which are delivering SHIP services. If the subawards are further regranting, we do not need to track those.

As required by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, SEC. 50207 (b):

STATE HEALTH INSURANCE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—Beginning not later than April 

1, 2019, and biennially thereafter, the Agency for Community Living shall electronically post on its website the 

following information, with respect to grants to States for State health insurance assistance programs, (such 

information to be presented by State and by entity receiving funds from the State to carry out such a program 

(1) The amount of Federal funding provided to each such State for such program for the period involved and the 

amount of Federal funding provided by each such State for such program to each such entity for the period 

(2) Information as the Secretary may specify, with respect to such programs carried out through such grants, 

consistent with the terms and conditions for receipt of such grants.

Public Burden Statement: According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to 

respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number (OMB 0985-

0070). Public reporting burden for this collection of information averages and estimate of one hour per 

response, including time for gathering, maintaining the data, completing, and reviewing the collection of 

information. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to retain or maintain benefits under the 

OMB Control Number 0985-0070

Expiration: MM/DY/202X
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Key Elements to Implementing a Successful ADR Program","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hwJfM8WCGi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/key-elements-to-implementing-a-successful-adr-program\/\">Key Elements to Implementing a Successful ADR Program<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/key-elements-to-implementing-a-successful-adr-program\/embed\/#?secret=hwJfM8WCGi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Key Elements to Implementing a Successful ADR Program” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"hwJfM8WCGi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
§ 325.6 Duration of permits. ( a ) *General.* DA permits may authorize both the work and the resulting use. Permits continue in effect until they automatically expire or are modified, suspended, or revoked.
( b ) *Structures.* Permits for the existence of a structure or other activity of a permanent nature are usually for an indefinite duration with no expiration date cited. However, where a temporary structure is authorized, or where restoration of a waterway is contemplated, the permit will be of limited duration with a definite expiration date.
( c ) *Works.* Permits for construction work, discharge of dredged or fill material, or other activity and any construction period for a structure with a permit of indefinite duration under paragraph (b) of this section will specify time limits for completing the work or activity. The permit may also specify a date by which the work must be started, normally within one year from the date of issuance. The date will be established by the issuing official and will provide reasonable times based on the scope and nature of the work involved. Permits issued for the transport of dredged material for the purpose of disposing of it in ocean waters will specify a completion date for the disposal not to exceed three years from the date of permit issuance.
( d ) *Extensions of time.* An authorization or construction period will automatically expire if the permittee fails to request and receive an extension of time. Extensions of time may be granted by the district engineer. The permittee must request the extension and explain the basis of the request, which will be granted unless the district engineer determines that an extension would be contrary to the public interest. Requests for extensions will be processed in accordance with the regular procedures of § 325.2 of this part, including issuance of a public notice, except that such processing is not required where the district engineer determines that there have been no significant changes in the attendant circumstances since the authorization was issued.
( e ) *Maintenance dredging.* If the authorized work includes periodic maintenance dredging, an expiration date for the authorization of that maintenance dredging will be included in the permit. The expiration date, which in no event is to exceed ten years from the date of issuance of the permit, will be established by the issuing official after evaluation of the proposed method of dredging and disposal of the dredged material in accordance with the requirements of 33 CFR parts 320 to 325. In such cases, the district engineer shall require notification of the maintenance dredging prior to actual performance to insure continued compliance with the requirements of this regulation and 33 CFR parts 320 to 324. If the permittee desires to continue maintenance dredging beyond the expiration date, he must request a new permit. The permittee should be advised to apply for the new permit six months prior to the time he wishes to do the maintenance work.
Exhibit 32(d)
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power
Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we, the undersigned, hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of our knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf Power Company for the quarter
     ended September 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gulf
     Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Gulf Power Company.



                                /s/Susan N. Story
                                 Susan N. Story
                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                              /s/Ronnie R. Labrato
                                Ronnie R. Labrato
                     Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                 and Comptroller

Date:  November 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | RELM Wireless Corporation                           
| |                                                     
| |                                                     
| | /s/WILLIAMP. KELLY                                  
| | William P. Kelly                                    
| | Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2007
§ 95.040 Refusal to submit to testing. ( a ) If an individual refuses to submit to or cooperate in the administration of a timely chemical test when directed by a law enforcement officer based on reasonable cause, evidence of the refusal is admissible in evidence in any administrative proceeding and the individual will be presumed to be under the influence of alcohol or a dangerous drug.
( b ) If an individual refuses to submit to or cooperate in the administration of a timely chemical test when directed by the marine employer based on reasonable cause, evidence of the refusal is admissible in evidence in any administrative proceeding.
[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47532, Dec. 14, 1987, as amended by USCG-1998-4593, 66 FR 1862, Jan. 10, 2001]
Tule River Indian Health Center, Inc. 

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year capacitybuilding grant are to:

• Develop capacity in areas with no or 

limited evidence-based program 

infrastructure to introduce and deliver 

evidence-based falls prevention 

programs within underserved geographic 

areas and/or populations; and

• Develop sustainability strategies to 

support the proposed programs during 

and beyond the grant period.

The Tule River Indian Health Center, Inc. (TRIHC)

and its partners will: 

• Engage ninety-five tribal elders in the Tai 

Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance 

evidence-based falls prevention program.

• Establish a Tribal Elders Fall Prevention 

Project Steering Committee.

• Prepare and facilitate a project 

sustainability plan to successfully embed 

the proposed project within the existing 

administration, infrastructure, and 

routine day-to-day operation of the 

TRIHC

Proposed Interventions

• Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance 

(TJQMBB)

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, TRIHC will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• Tule River Elders Council

• Tule River primary care providers

• TRIHC Board of Directors

Anticipated Results 

The TRIHC and its partners propose to achieve 

the following results: 

• Engage ninety-five tribal elders in the Tai 

Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance 

evidence-based falls prevention program; 

at least 80% of these tribal elders will be 

completers, and at least 80% will report 

high or very high satisfaction with the 

program.

• Establish the Tribal Elders Fall Prevention 

Project Steering Committee.

• Produce and implement a Tribal Elders 

Fall Prevention Project sustainability plan.
2 of 2

Contact:

Zahid Sheikh 

Tule River Indian Health Center, Inc. 

zahid.sheikh@crihb.org

Adrianna Atchison

Tule River Indian Health Center, Inc. 

adrianna.atchison@crihb.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov

This project is supported by the Prevention and Public Health Fund 2018.