alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5145

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to provide for the position of Assistant

United States Trade Representative for Small Business.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 11, 2000

Mr. MANZULLO (for himself and Mr. MICA) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to provide for the position

of Assistant United States Trade Representative for

Small Business.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Export

5 Enhancement Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. ASSISTANT USTR FOR SMALL BUSINESS.

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION.—Section 141(c)

8 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171(c)) is amended

9 by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
2

•HR 5145 IH

1 ‘‘(5)(A) There is established in the Office the position

2 of Assistant United States Trade Representative for Small

3 Business. The Assistant United States Trade Representa4 tive for Small Business shall be appointed by the United

5 States Trade Representative.

6 ‘‘(B) The primary function of the Assistant United

7 States Trade Representative for Small Business shall be

8 to promote the trade interests of small businesses, to re9 move foreign trade barriers that impede small business ex10 porters, and to enforce existing trade agreements bene11 ficial to small businesses. The Assistant United States

12 Trade Representative for Small Business shall be a vig13 orous advocate on behalf of small businesses. In carrying

14 out that advocacy function, the Assistant United States

15 Trade Representative for Small Business shall conduct

16 meetings throughout the United States on a regular basis

17 in order to solicit views and recommendations from small

18 business exporters in the formulation of trade policy. The

19 Assistant United States Trade Representative for Small

20 Business shall perform such other functions as the United

21 States Trade Representative may direct.

22 ‘‘(C) The Assistant United States Trade Representa23 tive for Small Business shall be paid at the level of a mem-
3

•HR 5145 IH

1 ber of the Senior Executive Service with equivalent time

2 and service.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>





                                  EXHIBIT 12.1
                       AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORPORATION
          COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                Nine Months Ended
                                  September 30,                              Years Ended December 31,
                              -------------------------    ---------------------------------------------------------
                                      2005       2004              2004       2003       2002       2001        2000
                              -------------------------    ---------------------------------------------------------
<S>                               <C>         <C>             <C>         <C>        <C>       <C>         <C>
Earnings:
Net income                        $    291    $   188         $     234   $    260   $    228  $     277   $     286
Income tax provision                    55         91                75        135        118        140         150
Interest expense                       826        619               863        852        916      1,458       1,459
                              -------------------------    ---------------------------------------------------------

Total earnings (a)                $  1,172    $   898         $   1,172   $  1,247   $  1,262  $   1,875   $   1,895
                              =========================    =========================================================

Fixed charges -
   interest expense (b)           $    826    $   619         $     863   $    852   $    916  $   1,458   $   1,459
                              =========================    =========================================================

Ratio of earnings
   to fixed charges (a/b)             1.42       1.45              1.36       1.46       1.38       1.29        1.30
</TABLE>



     Note: Gross rentals on long-term leases were minimal in amount in each of
the periods shown.
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 594 

Designating September 2008 as ‘‘Tay-Sachs Awareness Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2008 

Mr. BROWN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2008 as ‘‘Tay-Sachs Awareness 

Month’’. 

Whereas Tay-Sachs disease is a rare, genetic disorder that 

causes destruction of nerve cells in the brain and spinal 

cord due to the poor functioning of an enzyme called 

beta-hexosaminidase A; 

Whereas there is no proven treatment or cure for Tay-Sachs 

disease and the disease is always fatal in children; 

Whereas the disorder was named after Warren Tay, an ophthalmologist from the United Kingdom, and Bernard 

Sachs, a neurologist from the United States, both of 

whom contributed to the discovery of the disease in 1881 

and 1887, respectively; 

Whereas Tay-Sachs disease often affects families with no 

prior history of the disease; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 594 IS 

Whereas approximately 1 in 27 Ashkenazi Jews, 1 in 30 

Louisianan Cajuns, 1 in 30 French Canadians, 1 in 50 

Irish Americans, and 1 in every 250 people are carriers 

of Tay-Sachs disease, which means approximately 

1,200,000 Americans are carriers; 

Whereas these unaffected carriers of the disease possess the 

recessive gene that can trigger the disease in future generations; 

Whereas, if both parents of a child are carriers of Tay-Sachs 

disease, there is a 1 in 4 chance that the child will develop Tay-Sachs disease; 

Whereas a simple and inexpensive blood test can determine 

if an individual is a carrier of Tay-Sachs disease, and all 

people in the United States, especially those citizens who 

are members of high-risk populations, should be screened; 

and 

Whereas raising awareness of Tay-Sachs disease is the best 

way to fight this horrific disease: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates September 

2 2008 as ‘‘Tay-Sachs Awareness Month’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### § 262.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the official definition of those basic records and information management terms that are frequently used throughout Postal Service regulations and directives.
§ 334.1010 San Francisco Bay in vicinity of Hunters Point; naval restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* Bounded by the shore of the San Francisco Naval Shipyard and the following lines: Beginning at a point on the northerly shore of the Shipyard bearing 292°40′, 950 yards, from Hunters Point Light; thence 35°27′, 730 yards to the U.S. Pierhead Line; thence 142°55′, 1,300 yards, along the Pierhead Line; thence 180°, 2,450 yards, to the San Francisco-San Mateo County Line; thence 270°, 430 yards, along the County Line; thence 305°27′, 1,313 yards, to and along the southwesterly side of South Basin; and thence due north, 413 yards, to the southwesterly shore of the Shipyard. Note:
All bearings in this section are referred to true meridian.
( b ) *The regulations.* No person may enter the area and no vessel or other craft, except vessels of the U.S. Government or vessels duly authorized by the Commander, San Francisco Naval Shipyard, shall navigate, anchor or moor in this area.
[26 FR 11201, Nov. 28, 1961. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985; 51 FR 25198, July 11, 1986, as amended at 62 FR 17557, Apr. 10, 1997]
**Exhibit 23.1**

##### **CONSENT OFREGISTERED INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-91578 ofPeoples Community Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 27, 2007on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Peoples CommunityBancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the year ended December31, 2006 and three month period ended December 31, 2005 and for each of the twoyears in the period ended September 30, 2005, incorporated by reference in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc., for the yearended December 31, 2006.

/s/ BKD, LLP

Cincinnati, OhioMarch 27, 2007

 

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Changing Status of Bituminous-Coal Miners, 1937-46

              																	Bowden, Witt, 1886-1979					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Changing Status of Bituminous-Coal Miners, 1937-46 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 882*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1946,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4337,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BallyTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Haddrill,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to myknowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date:  November 7,2008

 
| /s/Richard  Haddrill                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard Haddrill                       |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

----
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2015-3942 ☐ These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2014-SW-064-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: ☒ FRAN ☐ SNPRM

☒ No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? 

If yes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the

previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point 

for guidance. Latest Revision.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: Choose one.

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): Click here to enter text.

What change to the AD action is requested? Click here to enter text.

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Click here to enter text.

Do we agree? Yes/No

If YES, we agree because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with Insert text because Insert justification We disagree with

Insert text because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD

If NO, we don’t agree because Insert our rationale

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: Choose one.

If other, explain: Click here to enter text.

Commenter(s): Click here to enter text.

What change to the AD action is requested? Click here to enter text.

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Click here to enter text.

Do we agree? Yes/No 
Page 2 of 3

If YES, we agree because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with Insert text because Insert justification We disagree with

Insert text because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD

If NO, we don’t agree because Insert our rationale

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-3154-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-3154-EM), dated May 10, 2000, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

June 1, 2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Madge Dale, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3772. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that, effective this date and pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive Order 12148, I hereby appoint Joe D. Bray of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared emergency. 

This action terminates my appointment of Mark S. Ghilarducci as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program) 

James L. Witt, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 00-14658 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-16-00007-CR

LAMONTE WESLEY BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court No. F-1434606-V

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the clerk’s and court reporter’s records in this case indicates that they contain 

“sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data, in the context of a criminal case, includes “a birth date, 

a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was 

committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). The aforementioned records include the name of a person 

who was a minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court 

orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any 

appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

clerk’s and reporter’s records contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her 

appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed clerk’s and reporter’s 

records in this case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: September 1, 2016
#### PETER WILSON, Plaintiff, *v.*JAMES VAN PELT, Defendant.

*Contract reserving growing crops—liability far use of lands—right of ingress and egress.*

Exceptions ordered tó be heard in the first instance at General Term, on the coming-in of a verdict in favor of plaintiff.

Articles of agreement were made between A= of the first part and B of the second part. The said party of the first part, in consideration of the sum of $125 per acre, agreed to sell to the party of the second part, his farm in the town of Brutus, “ excepting and reserving the wooden part of the house, up .stairs and down stairs, and the south half of the garden next north of the house, until the 1st of October, 1870. Said A also reserves, for his own use, all the wheat and rye now growing on said premises, together with sufficient room in the barn to put said wheat and rye into, and thresh the same.” A agreed to allow B, on October 1, 1870, $100 “ for the use of the premises above reserved by him, and which *423said sum of $100 is to be then applied upon the purchase-money of said premises. * * * In case A shall give to B full possession of said premises,-and shall remove therefrom within three weeks, then the above provision in reference to the rent of said premises shall be inoperative, and the said Van Pelt shall pay to said Wilson the sum of $2,100 instead of the sum of $2,000, on the first day of October, 1870.”

A, having given up the possession within three weeks, and the defendant (B) having harvested and removed the crops, *held,*in an action by A for conversion, that the court erred in charging the jury that the plain tiff, was not entitled to recover, as the clause of the- contract relating to the giving up possession within three weeks did not affect A’s title to the crops, but only to the wooden part of the house. The court further *held,*that when growing crops are reserved as such, the party reserving them is not, in the absence of an agreement to pay, liable for the use of the land on which they grow, and has the right of ingress and egress for the purpose of harvesting and removing them. *(Whipple*v. *Foot,*2 Johns., 418; *Stewart*v. *Doughty,*9 id., 108; *Shepard*v. *Philbeck,*4 Den., 174.)

*William Porter,*for the plaintiff.

*W. E. Hughitt,*for the defendant.

Opinion by

Mullin, P. J.

New trial ordered, costs to abide event.
§ 162.100 Ohio River at Louisville, KY. ( a ) *Emergency Mooring Buoys.* The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers has established four pairs of emergency mooring bouys. Each buoy is 10 feet in diameter with retro-reflective sides. The two buoys which comprise each pair are 585 feet apart and are located approximately at: ( 1 ) Indiana Bank—Mile 582.3 (near 18 Mile Island);
( 2 ) Six Mile Island—Mile 597.5;
( 3 ) Six Mile Island—Mile 598.2; and
( 4 ) Kentucky Bank—Mile 599.8 (Cox's Park). Note:
All buoys, except those at Six Mile Island—Mile 598.2, are removed between May 1 and September 30. Due to the close proximity of the municipal water intakes, mooring of tank vessels laden with petroleum products or hazardous materials is not authorized on the Kentucky Bank, Mile 599.8 (Cox's Park).
( b ) *The regulations.* A vessel must not use the emergency mooring buoys that have been established by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, unless specifically authorized. The Captain of the Port, upon request, may authorize the use of the emergency mooring buoys by downbound towing vessels that are awaiting Vessel Traffic Center approval to proceed.
[CGD 90-020, 59 FR 36333, July 15, 1994]
#### § 175.128 Marking.

No person may use a boat unless each signal required by § 175.110 is legibly marked with the approval number or certification statement as specified in 46 CFR Parts 160 and 161.

[CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13926, Mar. 28, 1996, as amended by USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34715, June 29, 1999]