******************************************************

The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the

beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will

be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the

date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative

date for the beginning of all time periods for filing

postopinion motions and petitions for certification is

the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion.

In no event will any such motions be accepted before

the ‘‘officially released’’ date.

All opinions are subject to modification and technical

correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the

event of discrepancies between the electronic version

of an opinion and the print version appearing in the

Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

latest print version is to be considered authoritative.

The syllabus and procedural history accompanying

the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official

Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service

and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes

of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of

the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal

Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.

******************************************************
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. TAUREN

WILLIAMS-BEY

(AC 37430)

Lavine, Alvord and Beach, Js.*

Reconsidered April 13—officially released May 9, 2017**

(Appeal from Superior Court, judicial district of

Hartford, Clifford, J. [judgment]; Alexander, J. [motion

to correct illegal sentence].)

Heather Clark, assigned counsel, for the appellant

(defendant).

Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state’s attorney,

with whom, on the brief, were Gail P. Hardy, state’s

attorney, Vicki Melchiorre, senior assistant state’s attorney, and Melissa E. Patterson, assistant state’s attorney,

for the appellee (state).
Opinion

PER CURIAM. This court originally issued its decision in the present case on August 23, 2016. See State v.

Williams-Bey, 167 Conn. App. 744, 144 A.3d 467 (2016),

petition for cert. filed (Conn. September 12, 2016) (No.

160154). In our decision, we concluded that the form

of the trial court’s judgment was improper and

remanded the case ‘‘with direction to render judgment

denying the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal

sentence.’’ Id., 781.

Several months later, our Supreme Court issued its

decision in State v. Delgado, 323 Conn. 801, 151 A.3d

345 (2016), and thereafter, on February 7, 2017, issued

the following order. ‘‘No action is taken on the defendant-appellant [Tauren Williams-Bey’s] petition for certification to appeal filed September 12, 2016, at this

time. It is hereby ordered, sua sponte, that the Appellate

Court’s decision in State v. Tauren Williams-Bey, 167

[Conn. App.] 744 (2016), is remanded to that court with

direction to reconsider its ruling that the trial court did

have jurisdiction over the motion to correct an illegal

sentence in light of our holding in State v. Delgado, 323

Conn. 801 (2016), and State v. Boyd, 323 Conn. 816 [151

A.3d 355] (2016).’’

Upon reconsideration, we are constrained by Delgado

to conclude that the trial court properly dismissed the

defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence and

that its judgment should be affirmed. See State v. Delgado, supra, 323 Conn. 801.

The trial court’s dismissal of the defendant’s motion

to correct an illegal sentence is affirmed.

* The listing of judges reflects their seniority status on this court as of

the date of reconsideration.

** This case was originally decided on August 23, 2016, by the same three

member panel of this court. Thereafter, our Supreme Court, sua sponte,

directed this court to ‘‘ reconsider its ruling that the trial court did have

jurisdiction over the motion to correct an illegal sentence in light of our

holding in State v. Delgado, 323 Conn. 801 [151 A.3d 345] (2016), and State

v. Boyd, 323 Conn. 816 [151 A.3d 355] (2016).’’