alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5136 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5136

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To make permanent the authority of the Marshal of the Supreme Court and 
 the Supreme Court Police to provide security beyond the Supreme Court 
                         building and grounds.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5136

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To make permanent the authority of the Marshal of the Supreme Court and 
 the Supreme Court Police to provide security beyond the Supreme Court 
                         building and grounds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAKING PERMANENT CERTAIN POLICING AUTHORITY.

    (a) Elimination of Sunset Provision and Reporting Requirement.--
Section 9 of the Act entitled ``An Act relating to the policing of the 
building and grounds of the Supreme Court of the United States'', 
approved August 18, 1949 (40 U.S.C. 13n), is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (c); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (c).
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Section 9 of such Act is further amended 
in subsection (b) by striking ``are hereby authorized'' and inserting 
``is authorized''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 10, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
. -- - wrc-H.A Fi:Pli-~ -~·~"···----·-·· · . ... . II/ESTERN A'f8R,11tf:r1 Rff/lJNI'fliiiRPIJRT 

Dennis DeVany 

400 47th Street S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

RE: Essential Air Service 

Dear Dennis: 

250023 AIRPORT TERMINAL STREET, STE 10 

SCOTTSBLUFF, NE 69361-7627 

OFFICE: 308-635-4941 

866-635-4941 

FAX: 308-632-7361 

www.flvsoottsbluff.cc;)m I 

July 27,2012 

I am sorry for the misconception my not responding to the EAS proposal had. That was 

certainly not my intention .. We at Western Nebraska Regional Airport do appreciate all of your 

hard work. I realize without EAS funding our community would not have flight service. 

Great Lakes has done a good job for us overall. When we have concerns we contact them 

and they do their best to work with us. We would recommend Great Lakes for our EAS provider 

for the next two years. 

Again Dennis, I am sorry for not responding to you and I appreci;:tte your continued 

efforts on the EAS front. 

V ery'truly yours, 

Western Nebraska Regional Airport . ~ .. 

,..,.. 

~~·;~elt~n Airport Director 

DS:oc
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0001077

30-SEP-2014

08:40 AM
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.239 Lewes and Rehoboth Canal. ( a ) The draw of the Savannah Road/SR 18 Bridge, at mile 1.7, in Lewes shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the SR 14A Bridge, at mile 6.7, in Rehoboth shall open on signal if at least 24 hours notice is given.
[CGD05-06-089, 72 FR 5619, Feb. 7, 2007]
##### 



Exhibit 12
 
 CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE
    
    Cash dividends paid/Common shares outstanding at date of declarationBOOK VALUE PER SHARE
    
    Total stockholders equity/Common shares outstanding at year-endRETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    Net income/Average assetsRETURN ON AVERAGE STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
    
    Net income/Average stockholders equityTANGIBLE RETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    (Net income)/(Average assets)TANGIBLE RETURN ON AVERAGE
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
    
    (Net income)/(Average Equity)EARNINGS PER SHARE
    
    (Net income)/(Weighted-average common shares outstanding)NET INTEREST MARGIN
    
    Net interest income/Average earning assetsNON-INTEREST EXPENSE TO AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    Non-interest expense/Average assetsEFFICIENCY RATIO
    
    (Non-interest expenses less non-recurring, non-operational items)/(Net interest income plus non-interest income)AVERAGE LOANS TO AVERAGE DEPOSITS
    
    Average gross loans/Average depositsDIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO
    
    Dividends declared/Net incomeAVERAGE STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY TO
AVERAGE ASSETS
    
    Average stockholders equity/Average assetsPRIMARY CAPITAL TO PERIOD-END TOTAL
ASSETS
    
    (Stockholders equity plus allowance for loan losses)/(Period-end total assets plus allowance for loan losses)TIER I CAPITAL TO PERIOD
    
    (Stockholders equity less accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)(Tier 1 Capital)/Risk-adjusted assetsTOTAL CAPITAL RATIO
    
    Tier 1 Capital plus allowance for loan losses/Risk-adjusted assetsTIER I LEVERAGE RATIO
    
    Tier 1 Capital/Quarterly average assetsNET CHARGE-OFFS TO AVERAGE LOANS
    
    (Gross charge-offs less recoveries)/Average net loansNON-PERFORMING LOANS AS A PERCENTAGE OF PERIOD
 END
    
    (Nonaccrual loans plus loans past due 90 days or greater plus renegotiated loans)/Gross loans net of unearned interestNON-PERFORMING ASSETS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL
 ASSETS
    
    (Nonaccrual loans plus loans past due 90 days or greater plus renegotiated loans plus other real estate owned)/Total assetsALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES TO PERIOD-END TOTAL LOANS
    
    Allowance for loan losses/Gross loans net of unearned interest
Oral Canc Oral Cancer

What African American men need to know

African American men have the highest 

risk of developing oral cancer compared 

to any other group in the U.S. population.

Ask your doctor or dentist for an oral 

cancer exam. It’s quick, painless, and 

it could save your life.

To order a free brochure about

African American men and oral 

cancer, go to www.nidcr.nih.gov

or www.cancer.gov.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research

National Cancer Institute
EXHIBIT 32

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Safer Shot, Inc. for the period ended, September 30, 2008, (the "Report")
I, John Lund, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Monumental Marketing, Inc.



Date:    January 15, 2009              /s/John Lund
                             -------------------------------------------
                                         John Lund
                                         President
                                   (Principal Executive)
Exhibit 32(c)


                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia
Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, we, the undersigned,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual
knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter
     ended September 30, 2005, which this statement accompanies, fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia
     Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Georgia Power Company.



                              /s/Michael D. Garrett
                               Michael D. Garrett
                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                              /s/Cliff S. Thrasher
                                Cliff S. Thrasher
                            Executive Vice President,
                      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  November 3, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61370-CIV-SINGHAL

HOWARD COHAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

PARTY CITY CORPORATION

d/b/a PARTY CITY,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Suggestion of Bankruptcy as to Party 

City Corporation (DE [18]) filed January 19, 2023. On January 11, 2023, Party City Holdco 

Inc., and its affiliates and subsidiaries, including Defendant Party City Corporation, filed 

voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, commencing Case 

No. 23-90005 (Bankr. S.D. TX.). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is STAYED as to Defendant Party 

City Corporation. The Clerk is directed to administratively CLOSE the case and any 

pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Either party can move to reopen pending 

further resolution from the Bankruptcy Court.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 20th day of 

January 2023.

Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF

Case 0:22-cv-61370-AHS Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/22/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 778.419 Hourly workers employed at two or more jobs. ( a ) Under section 7(g)(2) an employee who performs two or more different kinds of work, for which different straight time hourly rates are established, may agree with his employer in advance of the performance of the work that he will be paid during overtime hours at a rate not less than one and one-half times the hourly nonovertime rate established for the type of work he is performing during such overtime hours. No additional overtime pay will be due under the act provided that the general requirements set forth in § 778.417 are met and; ( 1 ) The hourly rate upon which the overtime rate is based in a bona fide rate;
( 2 ) The overtime hours for which the overtime rate is paid qualify as overtime hours under section 7(e) (5), (6), or (7); and
( 3 ) The number of overtime hours for which the overtime rate is paid equals or exceeds the number of hours worked in excess of the applicable maximum hours standard.
( b ) An hourly rate will be regarded as a bona fide rate for a particular kind of work it is equal to or greater than the applicable minimum rate therefor and if it is the rate actually paid for such work when performed during nonovertime hours.
Ex-99.1 a)

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder

of GMAC Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about GMAC Mortgage Corporation and its
subsidiaries' (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards
identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE
ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS ("USAP") exclusive of standards I.4.,
III.3, III.4., V.3. and V4., (collectively the "Applicable Standards") solely
for the purposes of servicing the home equity loans underlying the Consumer
Lending Portfolio as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 included in the
accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I).

As the loans applicable to management's assertion are home equity loans, rather
than first mortgage loans, certain USAP minimum servicing standards relating to
escrows are not applicable. Therefore, USAP minimum servicing standards I.4.,
III.3., III.4., V.3 and V.4., were not addressed during our examination.
Further, management's assertion and this report relate only to the servicing of
home equity loans underlying the Notes and not loans in the general consumer
loan servicing population.

Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those Applicable
Standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion exclusively on
management's assertion about the entity's compliance with the Applicable
Standards based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with the standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
Applicable Standards and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the Applicable Standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
Applicable Standards solely for the purpose of servicing loans underlying the
Consumer Lending Portfolio as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999 is
fairly sated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 8, 2000
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10377 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus RONALD EARL GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:93-CR-204-D
- - - - - - - - - - (October 19, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ronald Earl Green argues that the disparity in the penalty provisions and sentencing guidelines applicable to crack cocaine and cocaine powder violates his equal protection and due process rights and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. The disparate sentencing provisions for crack cocaine and cocaine powder in the sentencing guidelines do not violate constitutional due process guarantees. See United StatesNo. 95-10377 -2- v. Watson , 953 F.2d 895, 897 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 504 U.S. 928 (1992). We have rejected the argument that the guidelines applicable to crack cocaine violate equal protection because they have a discriminatory effect on African-Americans. Id. at 897- 98. We also have rejected an Eighth Amendment challenge to the disparity of the penalties imposed for crack cocaine. See United States v. Fisher , 22 F.3d 574, 579-80 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 529 (1994). AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of VoIP, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A
      for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony J. Cataldo,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
      1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:
                October 11, 2007/*s/
                Anthony J. Cataldo*Anthony
                J. CataldoChief
                Executive Officer
gmi8kx102_6282012.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.2












Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC


1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200


Foster City, CA 94404


 







June 27, 2012







Greentech Mining International, Inc.


1840 Gateway Drive, Suite 200


Foster City, CA 94404












Re:           Tender of shares for cancellation







Gentlemen:







By this letter, the undersigned tenders for cancellation 1,500,000 of the 5,000,000 shares of common stock par value $0.0001 of Greenetech Mining International, Inc. (the “Company”) which it holds.  Following the cancellation of such shares Accelerated Venture Partners, LLC will hold a total of 3,500,000 of the Company’s Common Shares.







Sincerely,







ACCELERATED VENTURE PARTNERS, LLC

















By: _____/s/ Timothy Neher___________________________


Timothy Neher, Managing Member
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,487,592
<SECURITIES>                               134,620,253
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,302,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (25,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           152,338,029
<PP&E>                                      17,686,065
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,404,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             174,784,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       86,863,210
<BONDS>                                     48,929,759
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,337,431
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,653,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               174,784,093
<SALES>                                      5,791,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,056,863
<CGS>                                        4,071,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,071,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,370,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,216,514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,398,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                   385,367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,013,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,013,071
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      23**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-127022) pertaining to the 2002 Employee Stock Option Plan and the
      2005 Stock Plan of Overhill Farms, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form
      S-3
      No. 333-130921) of our reports dated December 10, 2007, with respect to the
      financial statements and schedule of Overhill Farms, Inc., and the effectiveness
      of internal control over financial reporting of Overhill Farms, Inc., included
      in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30,
      2007.




/s/
      ERNST &
YOUNG LLP




Los
      Angeles, California


December
      10, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
          the Condensed  Consolidated  Balance Sheet and Condensed  Consolidated
          Statement of Operations  and is qualified in its entirety by reference
          to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    8,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         10,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,103
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,030
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,892)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,611
<SALES>                                        8,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,059
<CGS>                                          5,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                207
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            207
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   207
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .06


</TABLE>