alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4718 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4718

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2000

                                Received

                             July 27, 2000

       Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend for 3 additional months the period for which chapter 12 of 
            title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 105-277, as 
amended by Public Law 106-5 and Public Law 106-70, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``July 1, 2000'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``October 1, 2000''; and
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``September 30, 1999'' and 
                inserting ``June 30, 2000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``October 1, 1999'' and inserting 
                ``July 1, 2000''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on July 1, 2000.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 26, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 3040.153 Docket and notice. The Commission will establish a docket for each request to modify the market dominant list or the competitive product list, promptly publish notice of the request in the Federal Register, and post the filing on its website. The notice shall include: ( a ) The general nature of the proceeding;
( b ) A reference to legal authority to which the proceeding is to be conducted;
( c ) A concise description of the proposals for changes in the Mail Classification Schedule;
( d ) The identification of an Office of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in the docket;
( e ) A specified period for public comment; and
( f ) Such other information as the Commission deems appropriate.
[72 FR 63698, Nov. 9, 2007. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 9615, 9660, Feb. 19, 2020]
§ 3011.400 Motion for disclosure of non-public materials. ( a ) *Application of this section.* This section applies to non-public materials during the initial duration of non-public status, up to ten years, and any non-public materials for which the Commission enters an order extending the duration of that status under § 3011.401(a).
( b ) *Motion for disclosure of non-public materials.* Any person may file a motion with the Commission requesting that non-public materials be publicly disclosed. Any part of the motion revealing non-public information shall be filed in accordance with subpart B of this part. The motion shall justify why the non-public materials should be made public and specifically address any pertinent rationale(s) provided in the application for non-public treatment. The motion shall specify whether actual notice of the motion has been provided to each person identified in the application pursuant to § 3011.201(b)(2). If the motion states that actual notice has been provided, the motion shall identify the individual(s) to whom actual notice was provided, the date(s) and approximate time(s) of actual notice, the method(s) of actual notice (by telephone conversation, face-to-face conversation, or an exchange of telephone or email messages), and whether the movant is authorized to represent that the motion (in whole or in part) has been resolved or is contested by the submitter or any other affected person. The motion shall be filed in the docket in which the materials were filed or in the docket in which the materials will be used; in all other circumstances, the motion shall be filed in the G docket for the applicable fiscal year.
( c ) *Response.* If actual notice of the motion was provided in advance of the filing to each person identified pursuant to § 3011.201(b)(2) by telephone conversation, face-to-face conversation, or an exchange of telephone or email messages, a response to the motion is due within three business days of the filing of the motion, unless the Commission otherwise provides. In all other circumstances, a response to the motion is due within seven calendar days of filing the motion, unless the Commission otherwise provides.
( d ) *Reply.* No reply to a response shall be filed, unless the Commission otherwise provides.
( e ) *Non-public treatment pending resolution.* Pending the Commission's resolution of the motion, information designated as non-public will be accorded non-public treatment.
( f ) *Commission ruling.* The Commission may enter an order at any time after receiving a motion if the movant states that actual notice has been given to each person identified pursuant to § 3011.201(b)(2) and that the movant is authorized to represent that the motion is uncontested. In all other circumstances, the Commission will enter an order determining what non-public treatment, if any, will be accorded to the materials after the response period described in paragraph (c) of this section has expired. The determination of the Commission shall follow the applicable standard described in § 3011.104.
[83 FR 31281, July 3, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 9644, Feb. 19, 2020]
July 9, 2015 

Mr. Carl Ulbrich 

Jireh Communications Inc. 

625 W. Deer Valley Rd., #103204 

Phoenix, AZ 85027 

Dear Mr. Ulbrich: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 29th 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2659), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brittany Newton 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
sup-ex101_120.htm



EXHIBIT 10.1

 


	


	
World Headquarters  26600 Telegraph Road Suite 400, Southfield, MI 48033      Phone (248) 352.7300      Fax (248) 352.6989




August 8, 2019

Matti Masanovich

[Address intentionally omitted]

Dear Matti,

As a key leader of Superior Industries International, Inc. (the Company), Superior would like to offer you this Retention Bonus Agreement.   

Duration

The term of this Agreement will begin on August 8, 2019 and end on August 8, 2021, unless terminated before that time.

Retention Awards

You will be eligible for a cash retention bonus of $583,495.00 (USD) subject to the terms described below. The retention bonus will be paid to you through the next reasonable payroll cycle following August 8, 2021 provided you remain an employee of the company.

You have also been granted 35,000 RSUs (Restricted Stock Units) that will vest August 8, 2021, provided you remain an employee of the company. A separate document will be available to you at a later date.  

Termination

If the Company terminates your employment before the end of the duration of this Agreement, other than for cause, the Company will be obligated to pay you the full amount of the cash retention bonus and vest the granted RSUs. 

If you are terminated for cause at any point before the end of this Agreement, you will not be eligible for any portion of the cash retention bonus or vesting of the granted RSUs.

For purposes of this Agreement, cause means:

Your willful and continued failure to perform substantially your duties with the Company.

Your willful engagement in illegal conduct or gross misconduct.

Governing Law

The validity, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall, in all respects, be governed by the relevant laws of the State of Michigan. 



Modification

No provision of this Agreement may be modified, altered or amended, except by collective agreement between the Company and you in writing.

Arbitration

By signing this Agreement, you agree that any claims or disputes covered by this Agreement or resulting from your employment during the term of the Agreement must be submitted to binding arbitration and that this arbitration will be the only remedy for resolution of any such claim or dispute. This promise to resolve claims by arbitration is equally binding upon both you and the Company.

Any arbitration will be administered by the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Arbitration Rules. The Company will be responsible for any costs of arbitration, and each party shall bear its own expenses.

If you accept the terms of this Agreement, please sign below in the space provided.

Again, thank you for your leadership and dedication.

Sincerely,

 


	
/s/ Majdi Abulaban
	
 
	
August 8, 2019

	
Majdi Abulaban
	
 
	
Date

	
President and Chief Executive Officer
	
 
	
 




 


	
Acceptance
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Signature:
	
/s/ Matti Masanovich
	
 
	
August 8, 2019

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Date
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.805 What reports must be sent both to a classification society and to the Coast Guard?

The licensee must submit to the Sector Commander, or to the MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority a copy of each report submitted to an authorized classification society, as defined in 46 CFR 8.100, for maintenance of a single point mooring's class under the rules of that society.

[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39183, July 1, 2013]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5041

To establish the boundaries and classification of a segment of the Missouri

River in Montana under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. HILL of Montana introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To establish the boundaries and classification of a segment

of the Missouri River in Montana under the Wild and

Scenic Rivers Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF BOUNDARIES OF SEG4 MENT OF UPPER MISSOURI WILD AND SCE5 NIC RIVER, MONTANA.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Wild and Sce7 nic River Act (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.)—

8 (1) the boundaries and classification of the Mis9 souri River, Montana, segment designated by section

10 3(a)(14) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)(14)) shall
2

•HR 5041 IH

1 be the boundaries and classification published in the

2 Federal Register on January 22, 1980 (45 Fed.

3 Reg. 4474–4478); and

4 (2) the management plan for such segment

5 shall be as set forth in—

6 (A) the Upper Missouri Wild and Scenic

7 River Management Plan, dated October 1978,

8 as updated in February 1993; and

9 (B) the West HiLine RMP/EIS Record of

10 Decision covering the Upper Missouri Wild and

11 Scenic River Corridor, dated January 1992.

12 (b) REVISION OF BOUNDARIES, CLASSIFICATION,

13 AND MANAGEMENT PLAN.—This section shall not be con14 sidered to limit the authority of the Secretary of the Inte15 rior to revise the boundaries, classification, or manage16 ment plan for the Missouri River, Montana, segment re17 ferred to in subsection (a) after the date of the enactment

18 of this Act and in accordance with the Wild and Scenic

19 Rivers Act.

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall be con21 sidered to have become effective on April 21, 1980.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobertC. Caller, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date:  February 2,2010

 
| /s/Robert C. Caller                                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Caller                                                |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                                   |   |

 

----
§ 3020.121 Surrebuttal testimony. ( a ) *Scope.* Surrebuttal testimony shall be limited to material issues relevant to the Postal Service's proposal and to the rebuttal testimony which the surrebuttal testimony seeks to address. Testimony that exceeds the scope of the Postal Service's proposal or rebuttal testimony shall not be permitted.
( b ) *Motion for leave to file surrebuttal.* A participant who wishes to file surrebuttal testimony must obtain prior approval by filing with the Commission a motion for leave to file surrebuttal pursuant to § 3020.105(d) on or before the date provided in the procedural schedule established by the Commission. The motion must summarize the surrebuttal testimony the participant wishes to file and must identify and explain exceptional circumstances that require the filing of such testimony. The moving participant bears the burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances that warrant a grant of the motion. Answers to such motions may be filed as provided in § 3020.105(d).
( c ) *Deadline for filing surrebuttal authorized by the Commission.* In the event the Commission grants the motion for leave to file surrebuttal testimony, the moving participant must file its proposed surrebuttal testimony by the date provided in the procedural schedule established pursuant to § 3020.110.
( d ) *Adjustment of procedural dates.* If no participant files a motion for leave to file surrebuttal testimony, or if the Commission denies all such motions as may be filed, the remaining dates in the procedural schedule may be adjusted by the Commission as it deems to be necessary and appropriate.
§ 273.6 Evaluation by reviewing official. ( a ) Based upon the investigatory report prepared by the Investigating Official, the Reviewing Official shall determine whether there is adequate evidence to believe that a person is liable under 31 U.S.C. 3802, and, if so, whether prosecution would likely result in the imposition and collection of civil penalties and applicable assessments.
( b ) If the Reviewing Official determines that a case has merit and should be referred to the Judicial Officer for assignment to a Presiding Officer, he must first transmit to the Attorney General a written notice containing the following information: ( 1 ) A statement setting forth the Reviewing Official's reasons for proposing to refer the case to a Presiding Officer;
( 2 ) A description of the claims or statements for which liability under 31 U.S.C. 3802 is alleged;
( 3 ) A statement specifying the evidence that supports the allegations of liability;
( 4 ) An estimate of the amount of money or the value of property or services allegedly requested or demanded in violation of 31 U.S.C. 3802;
( 5 ) A statement of any exculpatory or mitigating circumstances which may relate to the claims or statements under investigation;
( 6 ) A statement of the amount of penalties and assessments that, considering the factors listed in paragraphs (b)(4) and (5) of this section, the Reviewing Official recommends be demanded from the person alleged to be liable; and
( 7 ) A statement that, in the opinion of the Reviewing Official, there is a reasonable prospect of collecting the amount specified in paragraph (b)(6) of this section and the reasons supporting such statement.
( c ) No allegations of liability under 31 U.S.C. 3802 with respect to any claim made, presented, or submitted by any person shall be referred to the Judicial Officer if the Reviewing Official determines that ( 1 ) an amount of money in excess of $150,000; or
( 2 ) property or service with a value in excess of $150,000 is requested or demanded in violation of section 3802 in such claim or in a group of related claims which are submitted at the time such claim is submitted.
The Board of Directors
    NELNET Student Loan Corporation-2:


    We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration  statement (No.
    333-93865) on Form S-3 of NELNET  Student Loan  Corporation-2  of our report
    dated February 7, 2001, relating to the balance sheet of NELNET Student Loan
    Corporation-2  as of  December  31,  2000,  and the  related  statements  of
    operations, stockholder's deficit and cash flows for the period June 1, 2000
    through  December  31, 2000,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2000
    annual report on Form 10-K of NELNET Student Loan Corporation-2.

    /s/KPMG LLP
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    March 27, 2001
1998

-  crop_production_12.11.98crop_production_12.11.98 (.pdf format)crop_production_11.10.98crop_production_11.10.98 (.pdf format)crop_production_10.09.98crop_production_10.09.98 (.pdf format)crop_production_09.11.98crop_production_09.11.98 (.pdf format)crop_production_08.12.98crop_production_08.12.98 (.pdf format)crop_production_07.10.98crop_production_07.10.98 (.pdf format)crop_production_06.12.98crop_production_06.12.98_(.pdf format)crop_production_05.12.98crop_production_05.12.98_(.pdf format)crop_production_04.09.98crop_production_04.09.98_(.pdf format)crop_production_03.12.98crop_production_03.12.98_(.pdf format)crop_production_02.11.98crop_production_02.11.98_(.pdf format)crop_production_01.09.98crop_production_01.09.98_(.pdf format)
#### § 3030.240 General.

Unless a specific exception applies, unused rate adjustment authority, on a class-by-class basis, shall be calculated for each rate adjustment filing. Unused rate adjustment authority shall be added to the schedule of banked rate authority in each instance, and be available for application to rate adjustments pursuant to the requirements of this subpart.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard Haddrill, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date:  May 12, 2008

 
| /s/Richard  Haddrill                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard Haddrill                       |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

----
#### JEREMIAH S. DEVLIN and another, Respondents, *v.*JOHN S. DEVLIN, Appellant.

*Injunction—restraining use of name.*

Appeal from an order of Special Term, adjudging defendant in contempt for violating the injunction of the court.

The defendant had been enjoined from making use of the firm name of the plaintiffs, to attract custom to his shop by deception. The injunction restrained the defendant from using the firm name “ Devlin *&*Co.’,” in any form or manner; and it further ordered “ that the said John S. Devlin be, and he is hereby confined — whenever the word Devlin appears or is used in his advertisements, signs, placards, slips or other means and modes of making known his business or place of business, or offering for sale or selling his goods, wares or merchandise — to his own proper Christian, middle and surname conjoined, and without monograms, signs or other devices, which may tend to mislead or induce the public or any other person as aforesaid; and it is further ordered that the said John S. Devlin be and he hereby is confined to the use of his own name, John S. Devlin or. J. S. Devlin, without the use of a monogram containing the initials J. S. or other device as aforesaid; but nothing herein is to be construed or interpreted as preventing the said defendant from using his own name in his *652advertisements, signs or placards.” It was not claimed that the firm name “ Devlin & Co.” had been used ; but that a sign which contained the name J. S. Devlin, had been so arranged that it tended to mislead and deceive the public, in a manner forbidden by the injunction. The justice below came to the conclusion that that was the intent, of the arrangement of the figures, letters and words of the sign.

The General Term was of the same opinion, and affirmed the order appealed from, with ten dollars costs besides disbursements.

*Walter Edwards, Jr.,*for the appellant.

*John E. Devlin,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs besides disbursements.