alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 952.17 Presiding officers. ( a ) The presiding officer at any hearing shall be an Administrative Law Judge qualified in accordance with law or the Judicial Officer (39 U.S.C. 204). The Chief Administrative Law Judge shall assign cases. The Judicial Officer may, for good cause shown, preside at the hearing if an Administrative Law Judge is unavailable.
( b ) The presiding officer shall have authority to: ( 1 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 2 ) Examine witnesses;
( 3 ) Rule upon offers of proof, admissibility of evidence, and matters of procedure;
( 4 ) Order any pleading amended upon motion of a party at any time prior to the close of the hearing;
( 5 ) Maintain discipline and decorum and exclude from the hearing any person acting in an inappropriate manner;
( 6 ) Require the filing of briefs or memoranda of law on any matter upon which he or she is required to rule;
( 7 ) Order prehearing conferences for the purpose of the settlement or simplification of issues by the parties;
( 8 ) Order the proceeding reopened at any time prior to his or her decision for the receipt of additional evidence;
( 9 ) Render an initial decision, which becomes the final agency decision unless a timely appeal is taken, except that the Judicial Officer may issue a tentative or a final decision;
( 10 ) Rule on motion by either party, or on his or her own initiative, for a determination on the written record in lieu of an oral hearing in his or her sole discretion;
( 11 ) Rule on motion by either party, or on his or her own initiative, to permit a hearing to be conducted by telephone, video conference, or other appropriate means;
( 12 ) Rule upon applications and requests filed under §§ 952.19 and 952.21; and
( 13 ) Exercise all other authority conferred upon the presiding officer by the Administrative Procedure Act or other applicable law.
Ex-99.3 a)

March 31, 2000

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1999 fiscal year:

1. I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the
preceding fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these Officers' knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
duties, responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements throughout such
year, or if there has been a default or failure of the servicer to perform any
of such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description of each default
or failure and the nature and status thereof has been reported to Norwest Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

2. I have confirmed that the Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

3. I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing Agreement,
Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Seller/Servicer Guide
are in full force and effect;

4. All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable), with respect
to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

5. All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance on any
Mortgaged Property, have been paid, or if any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

6. All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

7. All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgage Property
required per section 6050H, 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code,
respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:
/s/ Michael Kacergis
------------------------
Michael Kacergis
Officer

Assistant Vice President
------------------------
Title

March 29, 2000
------------------------
Date
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Petitioner

v.

CHINA L.B. RUTLEDGE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 19 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2017, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4888 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4888

                     To protect innocent children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2000

 Ms. Ros-Lehtinen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
  the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     To protect innocent children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Innocent Child Protection Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF INNOCENT CHILDREN.

    It shall be unlawful for any authority, military or civil, of the 
United States, a State, or any district, possession, commonwealth or 
other territory under the authority of the United States to carry out a 
sentence of death on a woman while she carries a child in utero. In 
this section, the term ``child in utero'' means a member of the species 
homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.
                                 <all>
```
§ 3055.60 Package Services. ( a ) For each product within the Package Services class, report the-on-time service performance (as a percentage rounded to one decimal place), disaggregated by the Destination Entry and End-to-End entry mail, provided at the District, Postal Administrative Area, and National levels.
( b ) For each product within the Package Services class, report the service variance (as a percentage rounded to one decimal place) for mail delivered within +1 day, +2 days, and +3 days of its applicable service standard, disaggregated by the Destination Entry and End-to-End entry mail, provided at the District, Postal Administrative Area, and National levels.
[88 FR 10042, Feb. 16, 2023]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
K. S. Adams, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ K. S. Adams, Jr.
------------------------------------
K. S. Adams, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Adams Resources &
Energy, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                      -34-
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in Ohio Industries: A Study of Hours and Wages

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women in Ohio Industries: A Study of Hours and Wages : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 44*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1925,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5362,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Loan Dates and Amounts

COMPANY EIDL/PPP APPLICATION DATE LOAN AMOUNT DIS

Royal Elite Trans, LLC EIDL 4/1/2020 $ 289,400.00 One Solution Group LLC PPP 5/29/2020 $ 20,833.00 Clear Shot Entertainment LLC PPP 6/15/2020 $ 152,602.00 Unfold Perception LLC PPP 6/18/2020 $ 81,954.00 Clear Shot Entertainment LLC EIDL 7/2/2020 $ 149,900.00 DDZ Family Enterprises LLC EIDL 7/4/2020 $ 149,900.00 Figueroa DBA Perfect Landscaping EIDL 7/13/2020 $ 72,900.00 Sunrise City Construction Development LLC EIDL 7/16/2020 $ 149,900.00 Ferro's Entertainment and Production LLC EIDL 7/21/2020 $ 76,800.00 Jream Vision TV LLC EIDL 7/31/2020 $ 149,900.00 Unfold Perception LLC EIDL 8/2/2020 $ 20,000.00 Dad Money Investment Group, LLC EIDL 8/7/2020 Not funded Cinda Fondation Inc. EIDL 11/18/2020 Not funded Clear Shot Entertainment LLC PPP 2/12/2021 $ 133,750.00 Sunrise City Construction Development LLC PPP 2/12/2021 $ 143,222.00 Jream Vision TV LLC PPP 2/12/2021 $ 143,412.00 Cinda Foundation Inc. PPP 2/15/2021 $ 104,166.67 DDZ Family Enterprises LLC PPP 2/20/2021 $ 143,445.00 Unfold Perception LLC PPP 2/22/2021 $ 81,952.00 Ferro's Entertainment and Production LLC PPP 3/25/2021 Not funded Sunrise City Construction Development LLC PPP 5/5/2021 $ 143,447.00 Jream Vision TV LLC PPP 5/5/2021 $ 143,447.00 DDZ Family Enterprises LLC PPP 5/5/2021 $ 143,447.00 

TOTAL $ 2,514,377.67 

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page
§ 181.33 Conditions for use of manufacturer identification codes. ( a ) No manufacturer or importer may sell or transfer a manufacturer identification code or use a manufacturer identification code that has been assigned to another.
( b ) A manufacturer or importer who changes the business name or address must advise the Commandant (CG-BSX-23), Attn: Recreational Boating Product Assurance Branch, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7501, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7501 of the change in writing.
[CGD 79-013, 48 FR 40718, Sept. 9, 1983, as amended by CGD 88-052, 53 FR 25122, July 1, 1988; CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33669, June 28, 1996; USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35024, June 19, 2008; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36287, June 25, 2010; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38449, July 7, 2014]
§ 265.4 Responsibility for responding to requests. ( a ) *In general.* When a request is received, the FOIA RSC will either respond to the request, or refer the request to the appropriate FOIA RSC or records custodians. The FOIA RSC will advise the requester of any such referral. The Postal Service, the Office of Inspector General of the Postal Service, and the Postal Inspection Service, respectively, are responsible for responding to requests they receive for records they maintain. Records responsive to a request ordinarily will include only records in the Postal Service's possession as of the date of the search. If any other date is used, the Postal Service shall inform the requester of that date. A record that is excluded from the requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(c) is not considered responsive to the request.
( b ) *Authority to grant or deny requests.* The records custodian of the requested record, or his designee, is authorized to grant or to deny the request. FOIA RSC staff may also grant or deny requests.
( c ) *Receipt and tracking of requests.* FOIA RSCs are responsible for the initial receipt and tracking of FOIA requests.
( d ) *Acknowledgments of requests.* FOIA RSCs must acknowledge the request in writing and assign it an individualized tracking number if it will take longer than 10 working days to process. The acknowledgement of the request must include a brief description of the records sought to allow requesters to more easily keep track of their requests.
[81 FR 86271, Nov. 30, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 15139, Mar. 27, 2017]
#### § 601.102 Revocation of prior purchasing regulations.

All previous postal purchasing regulations, including the *Postal Contracting Manual*, *Procurement Manual*, the *Purchasing Manual* (Issues 1, 2 and 3), and procurement handbooks, circulars, and instructions, are revoked and are superseded by the regulations contained in this part.
Golden Ribbon 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 19, 2015

No. 04-15-00013-CV

Guadalupe RAMOS,

Appellant

v.

GOLDEN RIBBON INC.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CV04293

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 A copy of appellant’s notice of appeal was filed in this court on January 9, 2015. The 

clerk of the court notified the appellant in writing that our records did not reflect payment of the 

$175 filing fee. In addition, our record contains no evidence appellant is excused by statute or 

rule from paying the filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20. It is therefore ORDERED appellant 

show cause in writing within fifteen days of the date of this order that either: (1) the filing fee 

has been paid; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the filing fee. If appellant 

fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to pay the 

filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(c) All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending 

the payment of the filing fee.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I,
Richard B. Abshire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard B. Abshire
------------------------------------
Richard B. Abshire
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Adams Resources &
Energy, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                      -35-
Order entered July 25, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01617-CR

JESSE LEE AUSTIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-82407-2013

ORDER

Appellant has informed the Court that he wishes to file a pro se response to the Anders

brief filed by appellate counsel. Counsel previously informed the Court that counsel sent 

appellant a copy of the record. Accordingly, appellant’s pro se response is due by

SEPTEMBER 10, 2014.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Jesse Austin, 

TDCJ No. 1889220, Buster Cole Unit, 3801 Silo Road, Bonham, Texas 75418.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### § 89.3 General.

Vessels of special construction or purpose which cannot fully comply with the light, shape, and sound signal provisions of the Inland Rules without interfering with their special function may instead meet alternative requirements. The Chief of the Prevention Division in each Coast Guard District Office makes this determination and requires that alternative compliance be as close as possible with the Inland Rules. These regulations set out the procedure by which a vessel may be certified for alternative compliance. The information collection and recordkeeping requirements in §§ 89.5 and 89.18 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control No. 1625-0019.

[CGD 80-157, 47 FR 13801, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended by USCG-2006-25150, 71 FR 39208, July 12, 2006; USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30878, June 28, 2019]
132 STAT. 4368 PUBLIC LAW 115–284—DEC. 6, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1209: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Mar. 5, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–284 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 901 N. 

Francisco Avenue, Mission, Texas, as the ‘‘Mission Veterans Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MISSION VETERANS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 901 N. Francisco Avenue, Mission, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Mission Veterans Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Mission Veterans Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 6, 2018. 

Dec. 6, 2018 

[H.R. 1209] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Onvia, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Pickett, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael D. Pickett                                                                        
|Michael D. Pickett Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President March 31, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Onvia, Inc. and will be retained by Onvia, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5059

To provide for a delayed effective date for the implementation of regulations

requiring audible warnings at highway-rail grade crossings, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. LIPINSKI, (for himself, Mr. HASTERT, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH,

Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. EWING, Mr. HYDE, Mr.

LAHOOD, Mr. PHELPS, Mr. PORTER, Mr. RUSH, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr.

WELLER, and Mr. ROEMER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To provide for a delayed effective date for the implementation of regulations requiring audible warnings at highway-rail grade crossings, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 Section 20153(j) of title 49, United States Code, is

5 amended by striking ‘‘365th day’’ and inserting ‘‘expira6 tion of 10 years’’.
2

•HR 5059 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUPPLEMENTARY SAFETY MEASURES.

2 Section 20153(a)(3) of title 49, United States Code,

3 is amended—

4 (1) by striking ‘‘as where adequate median bar5 riers prevent movement around’’; and

6 (2) by striking ‘‘flashing lights with gates that

7 do not completely block travel over the line of rail8 road,’’.

Æ
§ 3040.102 Product lists. ( a ) *Market dominant product list.* The market dominant product list shall be published in the Federal Register at appendix A to subpart A of part 3040—Market Dominant Product List.
( b ) *Competitive product list.* The competitive product list shall be published in the Federal Register at appendix B to subpart A of part 3040—Competitive Product List.
[85 FR 9658, Feb. 19, 2020]