alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0181

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SANDRA LYNNE JONES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 1, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2023

07/26/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0181
#### § 6.14-1 Safety measures.

The Commandant, in order to achieve the purposes of this part, may prescribe such conditions and restrictions relating to the safety of waterfront facilities and vessels in port as the Commandant finds to be necessary under existing circumstances. Such conditions and restrictions may extend, but shall not be limited to, the inspection, operation, maintenance, guarding, and manning of, and fire-prevention measures for, such vessels and waterfront facilities. Such conditions and restrictions relating to the safety of waterfront facilities and vessels in port may also extend to measures the Commandant finds to be necessary under existing circumstances to prevent, detect, assess, and remediate an actual or threatened cyber incident that could cause damage or injury to vessels, harbors, ports, or waterfront facilities.

[E.O. 14116, 89 FR 13972, Feb. 26, 2024]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 00-1144; MM Docket No. 98-218; RM-9388] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule, dismissal.

# SUMMARY:

                        This                         *Report and Order*                        grants a pleading seeking dismissal of a petition for rule making. The rule making petition had requested the allotment of Channel 244A at Peterstown, West Virginia and was mutually exclusive with an application (File No. BMPH-9811161F) of Equus Communications Inc. (“Equus”), licensee of Station WREL-FM, Buena Vista, Virginia. With the dismissal of the rule making petition, the proceeding was terminated and Equus's application was returned to the Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau, for further action.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

R. Barthen Gorman, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a synopsis of the Commission's                     *Report and Order*                     in MM Docket No. 98-218, adopted May 17, 2000, and released May 26, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, located at 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.                 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-14380 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.85

                                    AGREEMENT

      Effective as of January 4, 2000, Alliance Gaming Corporation and Kirkland
Investment Corporation, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are acknowledged, hereby extend and renew the agreement
between them dated July 1, 1997 (the "Agreement") in the following manner:

      Alliance shall not give notice of non-extension required by the first
      paragraph of the Agreement so as to cause the Agreement to expire before
      June 30, 2004. However, the parties agree that this document shall
      constitute notice, as required by the Agreement, that the Agreement shall
      not be extended beyond June 30, 2004.

      This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original. This Agreement is dated as set forth below.


Alliance Gaming Corporation               Kirkland Investment Corporation

By  /s/ ROBERT L. MIODUNSKI               By  /s/ JOEL KIRSCHBAUM
  -----------------------------------       -----------------------------------
        Robert L. Miodunski,                      Joel Kirschbaum, President
        Chief Operating Officer
        & Senior Vice-President
#### § 82.1 Purpose.

This part contains the interpretative rules concerning the 72 COLREGS that are adopted by the Coast Guard for the guidance of the public.

[CGD 76-133, 42 FR 35792, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981]
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 423 

Seeking the return of the USS Pueblo to the United States Navy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. BIDEN, and Mr. SALAZAR) 

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Seeking the return of the USS Pueblo to the United States 

Navy. 

Whereas the USS Pueblo, which was attacked and captured 

by the Navy of North Korea on January 23, 1968, was 

the first ship of the United States Navy to be hijacked 

on the high seas by a foreign military force in more than 

150 years; 

Whereas 1 member of the USS Pueblo crew, Duane Hodges, 

was killed in the assault, while the other 82 crew members were held in captivity, often under inhumane conditions, for 11 months; 

Whereas the USS Pueblo, an intelligence collection auxiliary 

vessel, was operating in international waters at the time 

of the capture, and therefore did not violate the territorial waters of North Korea; 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 423 ATS 

Whereas the capture of the USS Pueblo resulted in no reprisals against the Government or people of North Korea and 

no military action at any time; and 

Whereas the USS Pueblo, though still the property of the 

United States Navy, has been retained by the Government of North Korea for 40 years, was subjected to exhibition in the North Korean cities of Wonsan and 

Hungham, and is now on display in Pyongyang, the capital city of North Korea: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) desires the return of the USS Pueblo to the 

3 United States Navy; 

4 (2) would welcome the return of the USS Pueb5 lo as a goodwill gesture from the North Korean peo6 ple to the American people; and 

7 (3) directs the Secretary of the Senate to trans8 mit copies of this resolution to the President, the 

9 Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of State. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 510 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Private Calendar No. 2
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 510

                          [Report No. 106-68]

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to John R. and 
  Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land so as to 
    correct an error in the patent issued to their predecessors in 
                               interest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

  Mrs. Cubin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

                             March 17, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to John R. and 
  Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land so as to 
    correct an error in the patent issued to their predecessors in 
                               interest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF LOWE FAMILY PROPERTY.

    (a) Conveyance.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary of 
the Interior is directed to issue, without consideration, a quitclaim 
deed to John R. and Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, to 
the land described in subsection (b): Provided, That all minerals 
underlying such land are hereby reserved to the United States.
    (b) Land Description.--The land referred to in subsection (a) is 
the approximately 40-acre parcel located in the SW\1/4\SE\1/4\ of 
Section 11, Township 51 North, Range 96 West, 6th Principal Meridian, 
Wyoming.
                                     

                                                 Private Calendar No. 2

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 510

                          [Report No. 106-68]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to John R. and 
  Margaret J. Lowe of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land so as to 
    correct an error in the patent issued to their predecessors in 
                               interest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 17, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed
```
COVklywej,S 

Energy Poli 

19 5- .5-5t.) 

Zvi mss) ti\T .7.3 

iuNkl 30 ?-O ) 

Everyone globally must cease ail operations that utilize cod or any derivative 

thereof. These operations will be replaced by those that use less than 50% 

naturul gas from free flowing sources; mid more than 50% clean, -healthy, 

and safe sources that do not emit carbon in any form! Nuclear is not allowed 

unless it can be proven and demonstrated in advance of use that the facility 

is completely fail safe under all conditions. 

Fines will be imposed immediately until operations cease. These fines will be 

based on the amount of coal used and cannot be passed on to consumers of 

products produced using coal. 

It must be that hydroelectric power be developed and used from all existing 

dams and low head future sources. Wind, solar, and geothermal facilities 

sherd be -given 'high priority for .development. Other -clean sources sad as 

wave, tidal motion, and hydrogen should be included. 

The Pickent Plan shall be used for t -ction to convert mit-1<s, troits., 

and ships to free flowing natural gas, electric, and other clean energy. 

Develop new energy grid with underground transmission lines with minimum 

footprint. Superconducting lines should be developed and included. 

Sincer 

L),u, 

Sir. Eric W. Your 

yoc lAt9+tivta-; I ( (AA 

301-71-154b
#### § 3.5 Delegation of authority by Board.

As authorized by 39 U.S.C. 402, these bylaws delegate to the Postmaster General the authority to exercise the powers of the Postal Service to the extent that this delegation of authority does not conflict with powers reserved to the Governors or to the Board by law, these bylaws, or resolutions adopted by the Board. Any of the powers delegated to the Postmaster General by these bylaws may be redelegated by the Postmaster General to any officer, employee, or agency of the Postal Service.
§ 385.34 Changes to the Plan. ( a ) The Plan shall be updated to incorporate approved changes to the Plan resulting from: ( 1 ) Approval by the Secretary of the Army of a project to be implemented pursuant to § 385.13;
( 2 ) Authorization of projects by Congress;
( 3 ) Comprehensive Plan Modification Reports approved by Congress; or
( 4 ) Other changes authorized by Congress.
( b ) The Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District shall annually prepare a document for dissemination to the public that describes: ( 1 ) The components of the Plan, including any approved changes to the Plan;
( 2 ) The estimated cost of the Plan, including any approved changes to the Plan;
( 3 ) A water budget for the Plan; and
( 4 ) The water that has been reserved or allocated for the natural system under State law for the Plan.
( c ) The Corps of Engineers shall annually provide to the Office of Management and Budget an updated estimate of total cost of the Plan, the costs of individual project components, and an explanation of any changes in these estimates from the initial estimates contained in the “Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement,” dated April 1, 1999.
**Exhibit        99.5 **

|   | (i) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:** **November                29, 2006 | By:                                        | /s/ John                M. Cassaday |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                            | John                M. Cassaday                      |
|                                            | President and Chief Executive                Officer |

----

|   | (i) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:** **November                  29, 2006 | By:                                                      | /s/                  Thomas C. Peddie |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                              | Thomas                  C. Peddie                                  |
|                                              | Senior Vice President and Chief                  Financial Officer |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roosevelt Linden O’DONNELL, Defendant-Appellant,

No. 12299.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

Nov. 6, 1958.

Roosevelt Linden O’Donnell, pro se.

phil McNagny, Jr., U. S. Atty., Fort Wayne, Ind., Kenneth C. Raub, Martin H. Kinney, Asst. U. S. Attys., Hammond, Ind., for appellee.

Before FINNEGAN, SCHNACKENBERG and HASTINGS, Circuit Judges.

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Appellant has appealed from a judgment of the district court denying apPlant's motion under § 22551 to vacate sentence upon conviction for bank robbery.2

The only error assigned which merits our serious consideration is that his court-appointed counsel was ineffective, Appellant supports this charge by pointing out that counsel also represented appellant’s wife, who participated in the bank robbery, and that her father was present at the trial, paid said counsel a fee, and assisted counsel in her defense,

These facts, if true, do not support the charge of ineffectiveness. Moreover, we find in the record no evidence to support that charge.

. , „ ,, ..... judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

1

. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

2

. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a) and (e).
#### § 84.17 Intensity of non-electric lights.

Non-electric lights shall so far as practicable comply with the minimum intensities, as specified in the Table 84.14(b).
#### § 3.05-20 Sector Southeastern New England Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

Sector Southeastern New England's office is located in Wood's Hole, MA. The boundaries of Sector Southeastern New England's Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone start on the Massachusetts coast at Manomet Point at latitude 41°55′00′′ N, longitude 70°33′00′′ W; thence northeast to latitude 42°08′00′′ N, longitude 70°15′00′′ W; thence east to the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 42°08′00′′ N, longitude 67°08′17′′ W; thence south along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 38°24′45′′ N, longitude 67°41′26′′ W; thence northwest to a point near Watch Hill Light, RI, at latitude 41°18′14′′ N, longitude 71°51′30′′ W; thence northeast to Westerly, RI, at latitude 41°21′00′′ N, longitude 71°48′30′′ W; thence north to latitude 41°25′00′′ N, longitude 71°48′00′′ W; thence north along the Connecticut-Rhode Island boundary, including the waters of Beach Pond, to the Massachusetts boundary; thence east along the Massachusetts-Rhode Island boundary to the northeastern most corner of Rhode Island; thence northeast to latitude 42°04′00′′ N, longitude 71°06′00′′ W; thence southeast to the point of origin.

[USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36319, July 2, 2007, as amended by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38427, July 7, 2014]
#### § 331.12 Exhaustion of administrative remedies.

No affected party may file a legal action in the Federal courts based on a permit denial or a proffered permit until after a final Corps decision has been made and the appellant has exhausted all applicable administrative remedies under this part. The appellant is considered to have exhausted all administrative remedies when a final Corps permit decision is made in accordance with § 331.10.
Order entered December 15, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01154-CV

IN RE JAMES D. YOO, KEITH WARD, HANS YOO, YOUNG K. YOO, AND DANNY 

YOO, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-14351

ORDER

Before the Court is Relators’ Agreed Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER the 

costs of this original proceeding to be borne by the party incurring the same unless otherwise 

provided by agreement of the parties.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE