alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffect of external pressure environment on the internal noise level due to a source inside a cylindrical tankA small cylindrical tank was used to study the effect on the noise environment within a tank of conditions of atmospheric (sea level) pressure or vacuum environments on the exterior. Experimentally determined absorption coefficients were used to calculate transmission loss, transmissibility coefficients and the sound pressure (noise) level differences in the interior. The noise level differences were also measured directly for the two exterior environments and compared to various analytical approximations with limited agreement. Trend study curves indicated that if the tank transmission loss is above 25 dB, the difference in interior noise level between the vacuum and ambient pressure conditions are less than 2 dB.Document ID19840023156Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsClevenson, S. A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Roussos, L. A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1984Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:85814NASA-TM-85814Accession Number84N31226Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 199-20-96-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840023156.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 3.40-60 Sector Lower Mississippi River Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

Sector Lower Mississippi River's office is located in Memphis, TN. Subject to the overriding provisions of § 3.40-5, the boundaries of Sector Lower Mississippi River's Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone include all of Arkansas and all of Oklahoma with the exception of the Red River and Lake Texoma; in Missouri: Dunklin and Pemiscot Counties. In Tennessee: Dyer, Lauderdale, Obion, Tipton, and Shelby Counties, and all portions of Lake County with the exception of the area north and west of a line drawn from Mississippi River at latitude 36°20′00 N and longitude 89°32′30′′ W due east to Highway 78 thence northeast along Highway 78 to the Kentucky-Tennessee state line; in Mississippi: Desoto, Tunica, Coahoma, Bolivar, Washington, Humphreys, Holmes, Sharkey, Yazoo, Issaquena, Warren, Claiborne, Jefferson, Adams, and Wilkinson Counties; in Louisiana, all the areas north of a line drawn from the east bank of the Mississippi River at the Louisiana-Mississippi border, thence south along the east bank to mile 303.0, thence west to the west bank at mile 303.0, thence north to the southern boundary of the Old River Lock Structure, thence west along the southern bank of the Lower Old River, to the intersection with the Red River, thence west and northwest along the southern bank of the Red River to the northern-most boundary of Red River Parish, thence west along the northern boundary of Red River Parish and DeSoto Parish to the Texas-Louisiana Border, including Lasalle, Caldwell, Caddo, Bossier, Webster, Claiborne, Union, Morehouse, West Carroll, East Carroll, Madison, Richland, Ouachita, Lincoln, Jackson, Bienville, Winn, Grant, Franklin, Tensas, Catahoula, and Concordia Parishes; those parts of Avoyelles, Natchitoches, Rapides, and Red River Parishes north of the Red River, and that part of West Feliciana Parish north of the Lower Old River; that part of the Lower Mississippi River below mile 869.0 and above mile 303; and all of the Red River below the Arkansas-Oklahoma border.

[USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36324, July 2, 2007, as amended by USCG-2013-0491, 80 FR 20163, Apr. 15, 2015]
#### § 3060.22 Financial status report.

The Postal Service shall file a Financial Status Report in the form and content of Table 2, below.

Table 2—Annual Summary of Competitive Products Financials—PRC Form CP-02

[$ in 000s]

| | Beginning value | Change from prior year | Ending value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (1) Cumulative Net Income (Loss) After Assumed Federal Income Tax | | | |
| (2) Total Financial Obligations (List of Financial Obligations) | | | |
| (3) Total Financial Investments (List of Financial Investments) | | | |
| Line 1: Beginning Value: Sum total of Net Income (Loss) as of October 1 of Reportable Fiscal Year. | | | |
| Change from Prior Year: Amount of Net Income (Loss) of Reportable Fiscal Year. | | | |
| Ending Value: Sum of Beginning Value and the Change from Prior Year. | | | |
| Line 2: Beginning Value: Sum total of Financial Obligations as of October 1 of Reportable Fiscal Year. | | | |
| Change from Prior Year: Amount of Net Financial Obligations of Reportable Fiscal Year. | | | |
| Ending Value: Sum of Beginning Value and the Change from Prior Year. | | | |
| Line 3: Beginning Value: Sum total of Financial Investments as of October 1 of Reportable Fiscal Year. | | | |
| Change from Prior Year: Amount of Net Financial Investments of Reportable Fiscal Year. | | | |
| Ending Value: Sum of Beginning Value and the Change from Prior Year. | | | |
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 12.1
                       AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORPORATION

                  (a wholly owned subsidiary of American Express
                      Travel Related Services Company, Inc.)

          COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                               Three Months
                              Ended March 31,
                                (Unaudited)            Years Ended December 31,
                              --------------    ---------------------------------------
                              2004     2003     2003    2002     2001     2000     1999
                              --------------    ---------------------------------------

<S>                           <C>      <C>    <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings:
Net income                    $ 57     $ 66   $  260   $  228   $  277   $  286   $  223
Income tax provision            30       35      135      118      140      150      120
Interest expense               200      216      852      916    1,458    1,459    1,130
                              ----     ----   ------   ------   ------   ------   ------

Total earnings (a)            $287     $317   $1,247   $1,262   $1,875   $1,895   $1,473
                              ====     ====   ======   ======   ======   ======   ======

Fixed charges -
   interest expense (b)       $200     $216   $  852   $  916   $1,458   $1,459   $1,130
                              ====     ====   ======   ======   ======   ======   ======

Ratio of earnings
   to fixed charges (a/b)     1.43     1.47     1.46     1.38     1.29     1.30     1.30

</TABLE>

Note: Gross rentals on long-term leases were minimal in amount in each of the
      periods shown.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TAROUS LEE MCDUFFIE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2904

[October 20, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Jeffrey Walton Hendriks, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2020-

MM-001959A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan T. Mohs, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Tapia, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 67

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

#### § 67.40-15 Marking at owner's expense.

The District Commander may mark, for the protection of marine commerce, any structure whenever the owner thereof has failed suitably to mark the same in accordance with this part, and the owner shall reimburse the Coast Guard for all costs incurred.
§ 3010.150 Notices. ( a ) *Purpose.* A notice is a document that announces a past, present, or future, event or occurrence. A notice shall not be combined with a request for any order or ruling that otherwise should be presented by motion. The Commission or presiding officer shall not combine a notice with a Commission order or a presiding officer's ruling, unless the title of the document clearly states the intent of document being issued.
( b ) *Filing requirements.* The title of any document filed as a notice shall contain the word “notice.” Additional requirements for the content of specific forms of notices are provided throughout chapter III of this title, where appropriate.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 520 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 520

  Relating to the period of availability of certain emergency relief 
funds allocated under section 125 of title 23, United States Code, for 
carrying out a project to repair or reconstruct a portion of a Federal-
           aid primary route in San Mateo County, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

     Mr. Lantos (for himself, Mr. Campbell, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Pelosi) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Relating to the period of availability of certain emergency relief 
funds allocated under section 125 of title 23, United States Code, for 
carrying out a project to repair or reconstruct a portion of a Federal-
           aid primary route in San Mateo County, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Devil's Slide Tunnel Act''.

SEC. 2. PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY.

    Section 6 of the Act entitled ``An Act to apportion certain funds 
for construction of the National System of Interstate and Defense 
Highways for fiscal year 1985 and to increase the amount authorized to 
be expended for emergency relief under title 23, United States Code, 
and for other purposes'', approved March 9, 1984 (98 Stat. 55), 
relating to a project to repair or reconstruct a portion of a Federal-
aid primary route in San Mateo County, California, is amended by 
inserting ``(a)'' before ``A project'' and by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, sums that are 
allocated under section 3 for any project alternative selected under 
this section before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this 
subsection for a project shall remain available until expended.''.
                                 <all>
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1"> The People of the State of New York,<br><br>against<br><br>Gerald Howard, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Alexander M. Tisch, J.), rendered July 26, 2014, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Alexander M. Tisch, J.), rendered July 26, 2014, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. It charged all the elements of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 220.03), and set forth sufficient factual allegations to show the basis for the arresting officer's conclusion that the substance at issue was a controlled substance. The instrument recited that police "recovered crack/cocaine residue" and "one loose rock of crack/cocaine" from the vehicle defendant entered, and that the officer believed the substance to be crack/cocaine "based upon [his] professional training as a police officer in the identification of drugs, [his] prior experience as a police officer making drug arrests, and an observation of the packaging, which is characteristic of this type of drug" (<i>see People v Smalls</i>, 26 NY3d 1064 [2015]<i>; People v Kalin</i>, 12 NY3d 225, 231-232 [2009]; <a href="../2010/2010_07996.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Pearson</i>, 78 AD3d 445</a> [2010], <i>lv denied </i>16 NY3d 799 [2011]).</p><br>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.<br>I concurI concurI concur<br>Decision Date: September 15, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
§ 207.330 Mississippi River between Winnibigoshish and Pokegama dams, Leech River between outlet of Leech Lake and Mississippi River, and Pokegama reservoir; logging. ( a ) Parties engaged in the transportation of loose logs, timbers, and rafts of logs, poles, posts, ties, or pulpwood, on the waters described in this section, shall conduct their operations so as to interfere as little as possible with navigation by steamboats, launches, or other craft, or with the operations of other parties using the waters for purposes similar to their own, and, so far as may be possible, shall prevent the formation of log jams.
( b ) In case of the formation of a jam, the owner of the logs, poles, posts, ties, or pulpwood, causing the jam, or the representatives in charge of the drive or tow, shall cause the same to be broken with the least practicable delay.
( c ) Steamboats, launches, or other craft desiring to pass through a body of floating logs, poles, or ties shall be given all reasonable and necessary assistance in doing so by the representatives in charge of the logs, poles, posts, ties, or pulpwood causing the obstruction.
( d ) Any individual, firm, or corporation banking logs, poles, posts, ties, or pulpwood on the shores or within the banks of any of the waters covered by this section, which are to be transported during the navigation season, shall so place them as to maintain a clear navigable channel width of not less than 20 feet.
( e ) Parties using the river for rafted poles, posts, ties, or pulpwood shall not tie rafts up to the bank two or more abreast; shall not tie up where there will be less than 50 feet of clear waterway between their raft and the other bank or between their raft and another tied to the opposite bank; and shall not tie more than three rafts along any bank without leaving an opening for a landing.
[Regs., Mar. 5, 1915]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

EMILIO PINERO, 

 Plaintiff,

vs.

CANTELOP PROPERTIES 7, LTD.,

 Defendant.

Case No: 22-cv-23058-DPG

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

AS TO DEFENDANT, CANTELOP PROPERTIES 7, LTD.

Plaintiff, EMILIO PINERO, and Defendant, CANTELOP PROPERTIES 7, LTD., by 

and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby 

stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice against Defendant, CANTELOP 

PROPERTIES 7, LTD., with each party to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs except as 

otherwise agreed in writing.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Glenn R. Goldstein

Glenn R. Goldstein (FBN: 55873)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Glenn R. Goldstein & Assoc., PLLC

8101 Biscayne Blvd., Ste. 504

Miami, Florida 33138

(305) 900-2373

GGoldstein@G2Legal.net

s/ Lauren N. Wassenberg

Lauren N. Wassenberg (FBN: 34083)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Lauren N. Wassenberg & Assoc., P.A.

33 SE 4th St., Ste. 100

Boca Raton, FL 33432

(561) 571-0646

WassenbergL@gmail.com

s/ Rene Gonzalez-Llorens

Rene Gonzalez-Llorens (FBN: 53790)

Attorney for Defendants

Shutts & Bowen LLP

200 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Ste. 4100

Miami, Florida 33131

(305) 347-7337

rllorens@shutts.com

Case 1:22-cv-23058-DPG Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2022 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William S. Ayer, Chairman,
President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |                    
|------------------------- |  | -------------------
|                          | 
|By                        |  | /S/ William S. Ayer
|William S. Ayer          
|Chairman, President & CEO
|May 10, 2006
#### § 80.1395 Puget Sound and adjacent waters.

The 72 COLREGS shall apply on all waters of Puget Sound and adjacent waters, including Lake Union, Lake Washington, Hood Canal, and all tributaries.

[CGD 81-087, 46 FR 61457, Dec. 17, 1981; 47 FR 3351, Jan. 25, 1982, and 49 FR 3177, Jan. 26, 1984]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

November 9, 2005


Aceto Corporation
Lake Success, New York

RE:     Registration Statements (No. 33-38679, No. 333-90929 and No. 333-110653)
        on Form S-8

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 9, 2005 related to our
review of interim financial information for the three month period ended
September 30, 2005.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such report
is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Melville, New York
*Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 94-20651

Summary Calendar

_____________________

IN THE MATTER OF: TIGHE ANTHONY and

 NANCY LEE MERELLI,

Debtors.

FRANK MCINTYRE,

Appellant,

v.

NANCY LEE MERELLI and TIGHE ANTHONY,

Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CA H 94 1752)

_________________________________________________________________

(April 14, 1995)

Before KING, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court correctly dismissed appellant Frank

McIntyre's appeal. The bankruptcy court judgment appealed from was

entered on October 23, 1992. Under Bankruptcy Rule 8002, a notice
2

of appeal must be filed within ten days of the date of entry of the

judgment. The ten-day period may be extended once, for a maximum

of twenty days, upon a showing of excusable neglect. McIntyre's

motion for leave to appeal was filed more than five months after

the entry of judgment by the bankruptcy court. McIntyre argued

that he lacked actual notice of the entry of the bankruptcy court's

judgment. But, as the district court correctly pointed out,

McIntyre's lack of notice of the entry of judgment is irrelevant.

Under Bankruptcy Rule 9022, lack of notice of the entry of a court

order does not affect the time to appeal or authorize the court to

relieve a party for failure to file a timely appeal. We agree with

the district court that Bankruptcy Rule 9022 should be construed in

the same manner as Fed. R. Crim. P. 49(b), i.e., it is mandatory

and precludes out-of-time appeals. See United States v. Awalt, 728

F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir. 1984).

The district court's order dismissing McIntyre's appeal is

AFFIRMED.
#### § 310.7 Amendment of regulations.

Amendments of the regulations in this part and in part 320 may be made only in accordance with the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act.

[40 FR 23295, May 29, 1975]
§ 3011.302 Non-dissemination, use, and care of non-public materials. ( a ) No person who has been granted access to non-public materials in accordance with § 3011.300 or § 3011.301 may disseminate the materials or the information contained therein, in whole or in part, to any person not allowed access pursuant to § 3011.300 or § 3011.301.
( b ) Persons with access to non-public materials under § 3011.300 or § 3011.301 shall use non-public materials only for the purposes for which the non-public materials are supplied.
( c ) Persons with access to non-public materials under § 3011.300 or § 3011.301 shall protect the non-public materials from any person not granted access under § 3011.300 or § 3011.301 by using the same degree of care, but no less than a reasonable degree of care, to prevent the unauthorized disclosure of these materials as those persons, in the ordinary course of business, would be expected to use to protect their own proprietary material or trade secrets and other internal, confidential, commercially sensitive, and privileged information.
[85 FR 9642, Feb. 19, 2020]
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies
to my knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the
Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.








By
            /s/  Walter C.
      JohnsenWalter C.
      JohnsenChairman of
      the Board andChief
      Executive Officer





Dated:  November
13, 2009
















A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and
will be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.