alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3006.302 General provisions. ( a ) The Commission may charge search fees even if no records are found or if the records found are exempt from disclosure.
( b ) Except in the case of commercial use requesters, the first 100 pages of duplication and the first 2 hours of search time are provided without charge. ( 1 ) A page for these purposes is a letter- or legal-size sheet, or the equivalent amount of information in a medium other than paper copy.
( 2 ) Search time for these purposes refers to manual searching; if the search is performed by computer, the 2 hours provided without charge will be equal to 2 hours' salary of the person performing the search.
( c ) No requester will be charged a fee when the Commission determines that the cost of collecting the fee would equal or exceed the fee itself. In determining whether cost of collection would equal or exceed the fee, the allowance for 2 hours' search or 100 pages of duplication will be made before comparing the remaining fee and the cost of collection.
( d ) Records will be provided without charge or at a reduced charge if disclosure of the information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.
( e ) No requester will be charged a fee after any search or response which occurs after the applicable time limits as described in §§ 3006.202 and 3006.203, unless: ( 1 ) The Commission extends the time limit for its response due to unusual circumstances, pursuant to § 3006.201(d), and the Commission completes its response within the extension of time provided under that section; or
( 2 ) The Commission extends the time limit for its response due to unusual circumstances and more than 5,000 pages are necessary to respond to the request and the Commission has discussed with the requester how they could effectively limit the scope of the request or made at least three good faith attempts to do so; or
( 3 ) A court has determined that exceptional circumstances exist and excused the Commission from responding by court order.
( f ) The Commission may, however, charge fees for review, and in some cases duplication, for a partial grant of a request while it reviews records that may be exempt and may be responsive to the request, so long as the partial grant is made within the applicable time limits.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Harvey R. Blau, Chief Executive Officer ofAeroflex Incorporated, hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporatedfor the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated.

 
|   | /s/ Harvey R. Blau     |   |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                   |   |   |
|   | Name: Harvey R. Blau   |   |   |
|   |                   |   |   |
|   | Date: November 8, 2006 |   |   |
|        |                        |        |        |  |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporatedand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
§ 181.3 Definitions. As used in this part: *Associated equipment* means: ( 1 ) Any system, part, or component of a boat as originally manufactured or any similar part or component manufactured or sold for replacement, repair, or improvement of such system, part, or component;
( 2 ) Any accessory or equipment for, or appurtenance to, a boat; and
( 3 ) Any marine safety article, accessory, or equipment intended for use by a person on board a boat; but
( 4 ) Excluding radio equipment.
*Boat* means any vessel— ( 1 ) Manufactured or used primarily for noncommercial use;
( 2 ) Leased, rented, or chartered to another for the latter's noncommercial use; or
( 3 ) Operated as an uninspected passenger vessel subject to the requirements of 46 CFR chapter I, subchapter C.
*Date of certification* means the date on which a boat or item of associated equipment is certified to comply with all applicable U.S. Coast Guard safety standards in effect on that date.
*Date of manufacture* means the month and year during which construction or assembly of a boat or item of associated equipment begins.
*Manufacturer* means any person engaged in— ( 1 ) The manufacture, construction, or assembly of boats or associated equipment; or
( 2 ) The importation of boats, associated equipment, or the components thereof, into the United States for sale.
*Private label merchandiser* means any person engaged in the business of selling and distributing, under his own trade name, boats, or items of associated equipment manufactured by another.
*State* means a State of the United States, Guam, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
[CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33669, June 28, 1996; 61 FR 36786, July 12, 1996, as amended by USCG-1999;-5040, May 15, 2002; USCG-2003-14963, 77 FR 18703, Mar. 28, 2012; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35089, July 28, 2017]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Bernard F. McHale, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of SCHIMATIC Cash
Transactions Network.com, Inc., hereby certify that the Form 10-KSB of SCHIMATIC
Cash Transactions Network.com, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of SCHIMATIC Cash Transactions Network.com, Inc.


/s/ Bernard F. McHale
-------------------------
Name: Bernard F. McHale,
Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
Date: July 19, 2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, DavidA. Berg, Chief Executive Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended February 29, 2008 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of April,2008.

 

 
|   |  By:                                      | /s/ DAVID A. BERG |   |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|--------|
|   |  Name:  David A. Berg                          |
|   |  Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 777.51 Acceptance of donations.

Nothing in these regulations shall prevent a person from making a gift or donation of real property or any part thereof, or any interest therein, or of any compensation paid therefor, to the Postal Service. The Postal Service may obtain an appraisal of the real property for income tax or other purposes if the owner thereof requests the Postal Service to do so.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

NICORDO FOLKES,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:22cv10880-LC-HTC

C. MAIORANA, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 8,

2022 (ECF No. 3), recommending that this case be transferred to the United States

District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The parties were furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de

novo review of the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined the Report

and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The clerk is directed to TRANSFER this case to the United States

District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Case 9:22-cv-81300-AMC Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2022 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of August, 2022.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:22cv10880-LC-HTC

Case 9:22-cv-81300-AMC Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/23/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### F. M. BISTLINE and Anne Bistline, husband and wife, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 15607.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 13, 1958.

Bistline & Bistline, Beverly B. Bistline, Pocatello, Idaho, for appellants.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Carolyn Just, Lee A. Jackson, Melva M. Graney, Louise Foster, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Ben Peterson, U. S. Atty., Boise, Idaho, for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, Chief Judge, and POPE and FEE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this case, the familiar question, as to whether profit from real estate transactions is to be treated as capital gain or as ordinary income, is raised.

The trial court made findings as follows:

> “F. M. Bistline is an attorney at law. He was admitted to practice in Idaho, in 1920, and has maintained his own law office since 1923. The net income earned from his legal practice in 1946, was $860; in 1947, $934.”

> *81“In 15 separate transactions during 1946, F. M. Bistline sold 34 vacant lots for a net profit of $10,-950.26.”

> “In 7 transactions during 1947, F. M. Bistline sold 10 vacant lots and a 51.03-acre tract of land for a net profit of $9,033.”

> “In 12 transactions during 1948, F. M. Bistline sold 54 vacant lots and a tract of land for a net profit of $12,291.74.”

> “During the past twenty years, F. M. Bistline purchased large numbers of vacant lots and other real estate with the intention of selling them at a profit to any prospective purchaser.”

> “During the past twenty years F. M. Bistline has frequently and continuously sold a substantial number of vacant lots and other real estate.”

> “F. M. Bistline was engaged in the real estate business during 1946, 1947 and 1948.”

> “The properties sold by plaintiffs during 1946, 1947 and 1948 were held by them primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of F. M. Bistline’s real estate business.”

These findings of fact are amply supported by the evidence. The conclusion that such profits were taxable as ordinary income is inescapable. This Court adheres to the rule that such questions are of fact and that the findings of the trial court should be upheld unless clearly erroneous or where, on the record as a whole, it is clear that a mistake has been made. Although we do not consider these binding on the fact situation here, the opinions listed below are illustrative of the approach of the courts to similar problems. See United States v. Beard, 9 Cir., 260 F.2d 81; Bistline v. United States, 9 Cir., 260 F.2d 77; Pool v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 251 F.2d 233; Achong v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 246 F.2d 445; Stockton Harbor Industrial Co. v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 216 F.2d 638; Richards v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 81 F.2d 369, 106 A.L.R. 249; and see Fowler v. United States, D.C., 154 F.Supp. 859.

Afiirmed.
#### § 551.1 Semipostal Stamp Program.

The Semipostal Stamp Program is established under the Semipostal Authorization Act, Public Law 106-253, 114 Stat. 634 (2000), as amended by Public Law 107-67, section 652, 115 Stat. 514 (2001). The Office of Stamp Services has primary responsibility for administering the Semipostal Stamp Program. The Office of Accounting, Finance, Controller has primary responsibility for the financial aspects of the Semipostal Stamp Program.

[67 FR 5215, Feb. 5, 2002]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.108a



                                   May 9, 2003

Paul and Gail Sakamoto
c/o Donn Morey
6167 Bristol Parkway
Culver City, CA 90230

RE: SAKAMOTO LOAN- TERM SHEET

Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sakamoto,

The following letter will confirm the terms of the loan (the  "Agreement") to be
made by you,  Paul and Gail Sakamoto  (hereinafter  the  "Lender"),  to Vertical
Computer  Systems,  Inc.  ("Vertical"),  and the warrants  issued by Vertical in
connection  therewith.  The Lender and  Vertical  hereby  confirm the  following
terms:

1.   The Lender shall loan Vertical  $15,000 in cash and Vertical  shall pay the
     Lender a commitment fee of $2,500 to the Lender.

2.   Vertical shall issue the Lender a promissory  note,  dated May 9, 2003 (the
     "Note"),  in a principal  amount of $17,500,  on June 9, 2003,  which shall
     include  the  commitment  fee of  $2,500.  If not  paid  to the  Lender  at
     maturity,  Vertical shall pay an additional  $250 penalty to the Lender for
     each day that the funds have not been paid.

3.   In connection with this agreement,  Vertical  pledges to the Lender $17,500
     from the proceeds of the first $35,000 of any distribution to Vertical from
     its subsidiary,  NOW Solutions,  LCC, in connection with the upcoming court
     hearing and motion by Vertical to get funds due to Vertical.

4.   Vertical shall issue to the Lender 5 year warrants to purchase an aggregate
     of 250,000 shares of the VCSY common stock at a strike price of $0.075 with
     "piggy back" registration rights.

This  Agreement  shall be  governed  by the law of the State of  California  and
subject to the jurisdiction and venue of the courts of Los Angeles,  California.
If the  foregoing  meets with the  Lender's  approval,  please sign in the space
provided below.

                                               Sincerely,

                                               ---------------------------
                                               Richard Wade, President/CEO
                                               Vertical Computer Systems, Inc.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY LENDER:

---------------------------
Paul Sakamoto
Exhibit 

32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending March 21, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay Isco, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: May 21, 2007 | By:/s/			Jay Isco                                                 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Jay Isco, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Credco's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 1999 and Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended June 30, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                1,790
<SECURITIES>                                            796
<RECEIVABLES>                                        19,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                            615
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       24,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                              21,391
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  1
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         24,270
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,042
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         12
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        297
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         186
<INCOME-TAX>                                             65
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     121
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                            121
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
Case 1:22-cv-23362-KMW   Document 17-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2023   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:22-cv-23362-KMW   Document 17-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2023   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:22-cv-23362-KMW   Document 17-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2023   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:22-cv-23362-KMW   Document 17-2   Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2023   Page 4 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4787 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                                        
 
                                             (Original Signature of 
                                Member)

                                    

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. ____

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

   Mr. Barr of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Kingston, Mr. 
 Collins, Mr. Linder, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Deal of Georgia, 
  Ms. McKinney, Mr. Bishop, and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the 
        following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     ______________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the Federal building located at 600 East First Street in 
  Rome, Georgia, as the ``Lawrence Patton McDonald Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 600 East First Street in Rome, 
Georgia, shall be known and designated as the ``Lawrence Patton 
McDonald Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence Patton 
McDonald Federal Building''.
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)   In connection with the Annual Report of Health Enhancement Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Janet L. Crance, Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     Date: April 14, 2010 /s/ Janet L Crance Janet L Crance Chief Executive Officer    A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5116

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide additional authorizations

of appropriations for the program for the National Health Service Corps.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2000

Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr.

QUINN, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr.

THOMPSON of California, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. CONYERS,

and Mr. FROST) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide additional

authorizations of appropriations for the program for the

National Health Service Corps.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Health Serv5 ice Corps Reauthorization Act of 2000’’.
2

•HR 5116 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIA2 TIONS FOR PROGRAM FOR NATIONAL

3 HEALTH SERVICE CORPS.

4 Section 338H(b)(1) of the Public Health Service Act

5 (42 U.S.C. 254q(b)(1)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘1991,’’; and

7 (2) by inserting before the period the following:

8 ‘‘, $171,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, and such sums

9 as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years

10 2002 through 2005’’.

Æ