UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-23074-CIV-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

for himself and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

__________________________________________/ 

ORDER 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff Octavio Collado’s (“Plaintiff”) Notice 

of Discovery Hearing [D.E. 103]. This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636 by the Honorable Beth Bloom, United States District Judge [D.E. 26]. The 

undersigned held a hearing on this matter on April 5, 2023 (hereafter, “Hearing”). In accordance 

with the rulings at the Hearing, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. With respect to Defendants 450 North River Drive LLC, d/b/a Kiki on the River 

(“450”), Roman Jones (“Jones”), and RJ River, LLC’s (“RJ”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Initial 

Disclosures, Defendants shall expand their production of payroll records from three to five years 

and shall unredact the employee names contained in those documents. These unredacted payroll 

records shall be produced subject to the terms of an agreed confidentiality order to be submitted 

by the parties for the undersigned’s approval. Should the parties be unable to reach agreement, 

they may submit competing proposed confidentiality orders. Further, with respect to all of 

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 121 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 1 of 3
2 

Plaintiff’s discovery requests, Defendants shall expand the time frame of their responses from 

three to five years.

2. With respect to Plaintiff’s interrogatories seeking individuals’ contact information, 

responses providing defense counsel’s address for those individuals who are still under Jones’ or 

450’s control is sufficient; however, a last known address must be provided for individuals no 

longer under such control. With respect to Plaintiff’s additional request for the social security 

numbers and other personal identifying information (“PII”) of those individuals, Jones and 450 

may provide such information under the terms of the anticipated confidentiality order. Any

unresolved issues with regard to PII may be brought to the undersigned’s attention in accordance 

with the governing discovery dispute protocol. 

3. With respect to Plaintiff’s Interrogatory No. 7, 450 shall identify all responsive 

documents by Bates number. However, 450 need not perform the computations required by this 

interrogatory because they can be equally performed by Plaintiff based on the data contained in 

said documents. Should Plaintiff encounter difficulties performing the computations, he may seek 

450’s assistance. Any unresolved issues with regard to the computations may be brought to the 

undersigned’s attention in accordance with the governing discovery dispute protocol. 

4. Jones’ objections to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories Nos. 6, 11, and 13 are sustained. 

Jones’ objections to Plaintiff’s Interrogatory No. 10 are overruled. Jones shall respond to this 

interrogatory by identifying only the bank accounts of 450 and/or RJ for which he is (or was) a 

signatory during the relevant time frame. Jones need not disclose in his answer the existence vel 

non of other signatories to those bank accounts. 

5. Jones shall amend his answer to Plaintiff’s Interrogatory No. 14 to specify the 

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 121 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 2 of 3
3 

sources of information available to him regarding the existence of prior settlements for purposes 

of answering this interrogatory. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 6th day of April, 2023. 

________________________________ 

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cc: United States District Judge Beth Bloom 

 Counsel of Record 

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 121 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/06/2023 Page 3 of 3