alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-20125

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JERRIEUS WILLIAMS, also known as Jerrius Williams,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-266-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jerrieus Williams has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Williams has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 4, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-20125 Document: 00514498739 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/04/2018
No. 17-20125

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-20125 Document: 00514498739 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/04/2018
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,  Michael Moulton, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Epic Bancorp;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have:

(e)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedure, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(f)             [Paragraph reservedpursuant to SEC Release 33-8238]

(g)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(h)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.     The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting,  to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controlsover financial reporting.
| Date: March 30, 2005 | /s/ MICHAEL  MOULTON                     |   |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Michael Moulton, Chief Financial Officer |
|                      | (Principal Financial Officer)            |

 

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20048 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DANIEL ADRIAN CASAS

- HERNANDEZ, also known as Daniel Castro , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 519

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Adrian Casas

- Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 201 1). Casas

- Hernandez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 9, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20048 Document: 00514592330 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2018No. 18

- 20048

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordi ngly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-20048 Document: 00514592330 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/09/2018
§ 334.1120 Pacific Ocean in the vicinity of Point Mugu, Calif.; naval small arms firing range. ( a ) *The danger zone.* A triangular area extending westerly into the waters of the Pacific Ocean from a point on the beach north of Point Mugu, California, described as follows: Beginning at latitude 34°05′32′′, longitude 119°03′57′′; thence southwesterly approximately 4,000 yards to latitude 34°04′22′′, longitude 119°05′55′′; thence northwesterly approximately 1,500 yards to latitude 34°05′01′′, longitude 119°06′17′′; thence northeasterly to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Range firing will normally take place between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., Thursday through Monday, and between 6 a.m. and 11:30 p.m., Tuesday and Wednesday of each week. Within the above periods, firing will be conducted as determined by the Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Construction Battalion Center, Port Hueneme, Calif.
( 2 ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the danger zone will be open to fishing and general navigation.
( 3 ) The Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Construction Battalion Center, Port Hueneme, California, will announce firing schedules. Each week, public notices will be issued giving advance firing schedules. Such notices will appear in the local newspapers and in local “Notice to Mariners,” and “Notice to Airmen.” For the benefit of fishermen and smallcraft operators, announcements will be made on the marine radio.
( 4 ) When a scheduled firing is about to be undertaken or is in progress, a large red flag will be displayed from the control tower situated at latitude 34°05′32′′, longitude 119°03′57′′, so as to be clearly visible for a distance of at least three (3) miles offshore. Safety observers will be on duty at all times when the warning flag is being displayed from the tower. Upon completion of firing, or if the scheduled firing is canceled for any reason, fishermen and small-boat operators will be notified as far in advance as possible by Marine Radio Broadcast.
( 5 ) Persons, vessels or other craft shall not enter or remain in the danger zone when the warning flag is being displayed unless authorized to do so by the range officer in the control tower.
( 6 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commandant, Eleventh Naval District, San Diego, California, and such agencies as he may designate.
[28 FR 4785, May 14, 1963; 29 FR 1318, Jan. 25, 1964, as amended at 32 FR 5834, Apr. 12, 1967. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17558, Apr. 10, 1997]
§ 222.3 Other delegation. ( a ) *Documentation.* All delegations of authority must be officially documented.
( b ) *Position title.* Delegations of authority must ordinarily be made by position title rather than by name of the individual involved. An officer or executive acting for a principal has the principal's full authority.
( c ) *Level.* When authority is delegated to an officer, the officers above that officer shall have the same authority. Delegated authority does not extend to aides unless an aide is acting for the supervisor (*see* paragraph (b) of this section) or is specifically authorized by the superior to exercise such authority.
( d ) *Agreement with law.* A delegation must agree with the law and regulations under which it is made and contain such specific limiting conditions as may be appropriate.
( e ) *Further delegation.* Authority may be further delegated unless prohibited by law, a regulation that expressly prohibits further delegation, or terms of the delegation.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4967

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the classification of certain hospitals as cancer hospitals for purposes of payment

for inpatient and outpatient hospital services under the Medicare Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 2000

Mr. DAVIS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for the classification of certain hospitals as cancer hospitals for purposes of payment for inpatient and outpatient hospital services under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) of the

5 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(1)(B)(v)) is

6 amended—

7 (1) in subclause (I) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end;
2

•HR 4967 IH

1 (2) in subclause (II) by striking the semicolon

2 at the end and inserting ‘‘, or’’; and

3 (3) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(III) a hospital that was recognized as a clin5 ical cancer research center by the National Cancer

6 Institute of the National Institutes of Health as of

7 February 18, 1998, that has never been reimbursed

8 for inpatient hospital services pursuant to a reim9 bursement system under a demonstration project

10 under section 1814(b), that is a freestanding facility

11 organized primarily for treatment of and research on

12 cancer and is not a unit of another hospital, that as

13 of the date of the enactment of this subclause, is li14 censed for 162 acute care beds, and that dem15 onstrates for the 4-year period ending on June 30,

16 1999, that at least 50 percent of its total discharges

17 have a principal finding of neoplastic disease, as de18 fined in subparagraph (E);’’ and

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

20 1886(d)(1)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

21 1395ww(d)(1)(E)) is amended by striking ‘‘For purposes

22 of subparagraph (B)(v)(II)’’ and inserting ‘‘For purposes

23 of subclauses (II) and (III) of subparagraph (B)(v)’’.

24 (c) PAYMENT.—
3

•HR 4967 IH

1 (1) APPLICATION TO COST REPORTING PERI2 ODS.—Any classification by reason of section

3 1886(d)(1)(B)(v)(III) of the Social Security Act (as

4 added by subsection (a)) shall apply to 12-month

5 cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1,

6 1999.

7 (2) BASE YEAR.—Notwithstanding the provi8 sions of section 1886(b)(3)(E) of such Act (42

9 U.S.C. 1395ww(b)(3)(E)) or other provisions to the

10 contrary, the base cost reporting period for purposes

11 of determining the target amount for any hospital

12 classified by reason of section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v)(III)

13 of such Act (as added by subsection (a)) shall be the

14 12-month cost reporting period beginning on July 1,

15 1995.

16 (3) DEADLINE FOR PAYMENTS.—Any payments

17 owed to a hospital by reason of this subsection shall

18 be made expeditiously, but in no event later than 1

19 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
0-cr-06236-WPD Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2000 P
#### § 230.36 Contraband and property subject to court order.

Claims submitted with respect to property subject to this subpart, possession of which is unlawful, must be denied, in writing, by certified mail, and the person submitting the claim must be accorded 45 days from the postmarked date to institute judicial proceedings to challenge the denial. If judicial proceedings are not instituted within 45 days, or any extension of time for good cause shown, the contraband property must be destroyed unless the Executive Special Agent in Charge, or a designee, determines that it should be placed in official use by the Office of Inspector General. Property subject to this part, the disposition of which is involved in litigation or is subject to an order of court, must be disposed of as determined by the court.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

FRAMEWORK PUBLIC MEETING ON 

SET-TOP BOXES AND NETWORK EQUIPMENT

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Room 8E-089 Review Center

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to provide an overview 

of the rulemaking process for establishing an efficiency standard and test procedure for 

set-top boxes and network equipment.

Agenda

9:00-9:30 am Welcome; Introductions; Agenda Review; and Opening 

Statements

Doug Brookman

9:30-10:00 am Rulemaking Overview

Jeremy Dommu

10:00-11:00 am Test Procedure Rulemaking Overview

Allen Tsao

11:00-11:15 am Break

11:15 -12:30 pm Standards Rulemaking Analysis

Jeremy Dommu, Allen Tsao, and Louis Benoit-Desroches

12:30-1:30 pm Lunch

1:30-3:00 pm Standards Rulemaking Analysis - continued

Louis Benoit-Desroches

3:00-3:30 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks

Doug Brookman

At the end of each section, time will be set aside for web participants to ask 

questions and/or make statements.

Questions e-mailed during webinar will be included in the transcript.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,287                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  412,651                 344,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    205,071                 167,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               658,581                 520,665
<PP&E>                                       1,071,940               1,061,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               (239,026)               (207,655)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,496,335               1,375,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,038,983               2,396,343
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         9,764                   5,499
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,163,557)             (1,646,980)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,496,335               1,375,915
<SALES>                                      3,551,261               4,329,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,551,261               4,329,192
<CGS>                                        2,800,707               3,482,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,800,707               3,482,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,223,443               1,008,257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (65,945)                (63,447)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (472,889)               (161,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                497,863                       0
<CHANGES>                                    (535,540)               (188,237)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,677)               (188,237)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gary B. Horton, Treasurer of U-HAUL, International, Inc. certify that

1. the Quarterly Report of U-Haul International, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), which this statement
accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of U-Haul
International, Inc.

                                        /s/ Gary B. Horton
                                        ------------------
                                        Gary B. Horton
                                        Treasurer
                                        February 14, 2003
2010 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-26-2010

C.H. v. Cape Henlopen Sch

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 08-3630

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2010 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"C.H. v. Cape Henlopen Sch" (2010). 2010 Decisions. Paper 1234.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010/1234
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 08-3630

 

C.H., by and through his parents and

next friends, Timothy and Barbara Hayes

v.

CAPE HENLOPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT;

GEORGE E. STONE, Superintendent of Schools

Cape Henlopen School District;

DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION;

VALERIE A. WOODRUFF, Secretary,

Delaware Department of Education

C.H. Hayes; Barbara Hayes,

 Appellants

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Delaware

(D.C. No. 1-07-cv-00193)

District Judge: Honorable Mary Pat Thynge

 

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

April 12, 2010

Before: FISHER, HARDIMAN and COWEN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion in the above case, filed May 25,

2010, be amended as follows:
2

Page 26, the last sentence of the first full paragraph, which read:

Accordingly, we also will also affirm the denial of the

Parents’ request for tuition reimbursement on equitable

grounds.

shall read:

Accordingly, we will also affirm the denial of the Parents’

request for tuition reimbursement on equitable grounds.

By the Court,

/s/ D. Michael Fisher 

Circuit Judge

Dated: 26 May 2010
EXHIBIT A 

Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 50-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2022 Page 1 of 2
July 22, 2022

Casa Express Corp previously applied for a specific license (VENEZUELA-EO13850-2021-

874564-1) with OFAC seeking authorization to execute certain blocked real properties that are 

being held by Raul Gorrin Belisario (through sell entities) in partial satisfaction of a judgment 

that it obtained against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. On July 18, 2022, OFAC denied 

the application reasoning that it lacks authority to authorize the execution of these properties 

when “they appear to belong to another person other than [Venezuela].” We agree. 

In its original application, Casa Express explained its legal theory to OFAC. In a nutshell, Casa 

Express believes that the blocked properties are subject to a constructive trust in Venezuela 

because they were purchased with misappropriated Venezuelan funds. But whether a 

constructive trust should be imposed is a question of law that must be determined by the 

judiciary. And until a Court makes that determination, the shell entities are the owners of, and 

hold title to, the blocked properties. 

Casa Express understands that OFAC cannot issue a specific license to Casa Express authorizing 

it to execute the blocked properties as long as they appear to belong to another person other than 

Venezuela. For this reason, Casa Express submits this revised application for the limited purpose 

of obtaining a specific license that would authorize it to litigate its post-judgment collection 

theory in the case styled Casa Express Corp v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, et al. Case No. 

1:21-23103-BB, which is pending in the Southern District of Florida. 

To be clear, this revised application does not seek authorization to execute the blocked 

properties. It merely seeks authorization to litigate. If Casa Express prevails in Court, it will 

submit a new application for a specific license seeking authorization to execute the blocked 

properties. Because, at that point, the properties will no longer appear to belong to a third person 

other than Venezuela. 

Casa Express requests expedited review of this application. The shell entities have moved to 

dismiss the case arguing that any “judicial process” is “null and void” without a specific license. 

Casa Express’s reply brief is due on August 1.

Casa Express deserves its day in Court. And Venezuela has expressly authorized Casa Express to 

seek these claims on its behalf. 

I look forward to hearing back from the Department. 

Sincerely, 

GAMARDO, P.A.

Andres Gamardo, Esq. 

Counsel to Casa Express Corp

Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 50-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2022 Page 2 of 2