alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 334.300 Hampton Roads and Willoughby Bay, Norfolk Naval Base, naval restricted area, Norfolk, Virginia. ( a ) *The area.* ( 1 ) The waters within an area beginning at latitude 36°55′55′′ N, longitude 76°20′02′′ W; thence northwesterly to latitude 36°56′00′′ N, longitude 76°20′08′′ W; thence northerly along the eastern limit of Norfolk Harbor Channel to latitude 36°57′52′′ N, longitude 76°20′00′′ W; thence easterly to latitude 36°57′52′′ N, longitude 76°19′35′′ W; thence to latitude 36°57′47.7′′ N, 76°18′57′′ W; thence southeasterly to latitude 36°57′26′′ N, longitude 76°18′42′′ W; thence easterly to latitude 36°57′26.2′′ N, longitude 76°17′55.2′′ W; thence southerly to latitude 36°57′05′′ N, longitude 76°17′52′′ W; thence southeasterly to latitude 36°56′56.2′′ N, longitude 76°17′27′′ W; thence northeasterly to latitude 36°57′10′′ N, latitude 76°16′29′′ W; thence to the shoreline at latitude 36°57′18.8′′ N, longitude 76°16′22′′ W at the Naval Air Station.
( 2 ) Beginning at a point on the Naval Station shore at latitude 36°56′37.5′′ N, longitude 76°19′44′′ W; thence westerly and northerly along the breakwater to its extremity at latitude 36°56′41.5′′ N, longitude 76°19′54′′ W; thence westerly to a point on the eastern limit of Norfolk Harbor Channel at latitude 36°56′41.5′′ N, longitude 76°20′05.5′′ W; thence northerly along the eastern limit of Norfolk Harbor Channel to latitude 36°57′52′′ N, longitude 76°20′00′′ W; thence easterly to latitude 36°57′52′′ N, longitude 76°19′35′′ W; thence to latitude 36°57′47.7′′ N., longitude 73°18′57′′ W; thence southeasterly to latitude 36°57′26′′ N, longitude 76°18′42′′ W; thence easterly to latitude 36°57′26.2′′ N, longitude 76°17′55.2′′ W; thence southerly to latitude 36°57′05′′ N, longitude 76°17′52′′ W; thence southeasterly to latitude 36°56′56.2′′ N, longitude 76°17′27′′ W; thence northeasterly to latitude 36°57′10′′ N, longitude 76°16′29′′ W; and thence to the shoreline at latitude 36°57′18.8′′ N, longitude 76°16′22′′ W, at the Naval Air Station.
( b ) *The regulation.* No vessel or persons may enter the restricted area unless specific authorization is granted by the Commander, Navy Region, Mid-Atlantic and/or other persons or agencies as he/she may designate.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulation in this section, promulgated by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, shall be enforced by the Commander, Navy Region, Mid-Atlantic, and/or such agencies or persons as he/she may designate.
[67 FR 10844, Mar. 11, 2002]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5036 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5036

   To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to 
  clarify the areas included in the Dayton Aviation Heritage National 
     Historical Park and to authorize appropriations for that park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

Mr. Hall of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Hobson) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to 
  clarify the areas included in the Dayton Aviation Heritage National 
     Historical Park and to authorize appropriations for that park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dayton Aviation Heritage 
Preservation Amendments Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE PRESERVATION ACT OF 1992.

    (a) Areas Included in Park.--Section 101(b) of the Dayton Aviation 
Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)) is amended to 
read as follows:
    ``(b) Areas Included.--The park shall consist of the following 
sites, as generally depicted on a map entitled ``Dayton Aviation 
Heritage National Historical Park'', numbered ____ and dated ____:
            ``(1) A core parcel in Dayton, Ohio, which shall consist of 
        the Wright Cycle Company building, Hoover Block, and lands 
        between.
            ``(2) The Setzer building property (also known as the 
        Aviation Trail building property), Dayton, Ohio.
            ``(3) The residential properties at 26 South Williams 
        Street and at 30 South Williams Street, Dayton, Ohio.
            ``(4) Huffman Prairie Flying Field, located at Wright-
        Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
            ``(5) The Wright 1905 Flyer III and Wright Hall, including 
        constructed additions and attached structures, known 
        collectively as the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers Aviation 
        Center, Dayton, Ohio.
            ``(6) The Paul Laurence Dunbar State Memorial, Dayton, 
        Ohio.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 109 of such Act (16 
U.S.C. 410ww-8) is amended by striking the colon after ``title'' and 
all that follows through the end of the sentence and inserting a 
period.
    (c) Technical Correction.--Section 107 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 
410ww-6) is amended by striking ``Secretary of Interior'' and inserting 
``Secretary of the Interior''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 952.16 Appearances. ( a ) Respondent may appear and be heard in person or by attorney. A Notice of Appearance must be filed by any attorney representing Respondent.
( b ) An attorney may practice before the Postal Service in accordance with applicable rules issued by the Judicial Officer. See 39 CFR Part 951.
( c ) When Respondent is represented by an attorney, all pleadings and other papers subsequent to the complaint shall be mailed to the attorney.
( d ) Withdrawal by any attorney representing a party must be preceded by a motion to withdraw stating the reasons therefore, and shall be granted in the discretion of the presiding officer. If a successor attorney is not appointed at the same time, withdrawing counsel shall provide adequate contact information for Respondent.
( e ) Parties must promptly file a notice of change of attorney.
Director Office of International Aviation US Department ofTransportation 400 Seventh Street SW Room 6402 Washington DC 20590 USA 261h May2015
Reciprocity Statement 

## Transport Malta Malta Transport Centre Marsa, MRS 1917 Malta Tel: (356) 2122 2203 Fax: (356) 2125 0365 Email: info.tm@transport.gov.mt www.transport.gov.mt

This letter is to confirm thatthe Civil Aviation Directorate withinthe Authority for Transport in Malta will grant permission to US air carriers to conduct fifth, sixth, and seventh freedom charter operations on the basis of reciprocity. Sincerely, George BORG MARKS DirectorGeneral for Civil Aviation

Transport Malta is the Authority forTransport in Malta set up by AG XV of 2009
Case 1:22-cv-22972-RNS   Document 34   Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2023   Page 1 of 1
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 38

 39

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.48 N 77.37 W Meters AGL
§ 334.540 Banana River at the Eastern Range, 45th Space Wing, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The restricted area shall encompass all navigable waters of the United States, as defined at 33 CFR part 329, within the Banana River contiguous to the area offshore of Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida. The area is bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates: Commencing from the shoreline at the southeast portion of the area, at approximately latitude 28°25.17′ N, longitude 80°36.24′ W, thence directly to latitude 28°25.18′ N, longitude 80°36.65′ W, thence directly to latitude 28°25.25′ N, longitude 80°36.66′ W, thence directly to latitude 28°25.22′ N, longitude 80°38.36′ W, thence directly to latitude 28°26.23′ N, longitude 80°38.25′ W, thence directly to latitude 28°26.23′ N, longitude 80°38.47′ W, thence to reach the south side of the Kennedy Space Center NASA Causeway East Roadway at approximately latitude 28°30.74′ N, longitude 80°36.63′ W.
( b ) *The regulation.* ( 1 ) The area described in paragraph (a) of this section will be closed when it is deemed necessary by the Commander, 45th Space Wing or his/her designee to address any perceived threat to the local area. With the exception of local, State, and Federal law enforcement entities, all persons, vessels, and other craft are prohibited from entering, transiting, anchoring, or drifting within the restricted area when it is closed without the permission of the Commander, 45th Space Wing or his/her designee.
( 2 ) Due to the nature of this restricted area, closures may occur with very little advance notice. Closure of the area shall be noticed by the display of a red beacon located at the southern entrance to Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. Information will be provided via marine radio broadcast during the duration of the area closure.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, 45th Space Wing, Patrick Air Force Base, Florida and/or such persons or agencies as he/she may designate.
[74 FR 36401, July 23, 2009]
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Humatech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J.D.
      Rottweiler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                August 15, 2006
            /s/
                J.D. RottweilerBy:
                J.D. RottweilerIts:
                Chief Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Humatech, Inc. and will be retained by Humatech, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 18.1

          LETTER FROM KPMG LLP REGARDING CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE

May 6, 2005

Alaska Airlines, Inc.
Seattle, Washington

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have been furnished with a copy of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2005,
and have read the Company's statements contained in Note 2 to the condensed
financial statements included therein. As stated in Note 2, the Company changed
its method of accounting for major airframe and engine overhauls from the
capitalize and amortize method to the direct expense method. Under the new
accounting method, overhaul costs are recognized as expense as maintenance
services are performed. Also, as stated in Note 2, the Company believes that the
newly adopted accounting principle is preferable because it eliminates the
judgment and estimation needed to determine overhaul versus repair allocations
in maintenance activities. Additionally, the Company's approved maintenance
program for the majority of its airframes now focuses more on shorter, but more
frequent, maintenance visits that result in a higher portion of the work being
repair activity. Management of the Company also believes that the direct expense
method is the predominant method used in the airline industry. In accordance
with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company officials the
circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the decision to make
this change in the method of accounting was based.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to December 31, 2004, nor have we audited the
information set forth in the aforementioned Note 2 to the condensed financial
statements; accordingly, we do not express an opinion concerning the factual
information contained therein.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have
not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method
of accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the
Company's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management's business
judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Company's circumstances.

Very truly yours,

(signed) KPMG LLP
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Sherese Godschild, Plaintiff,

v.

Lauren Turner, Esq. and L. Turner 

Law P.A., Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-61723-Civ-Scola

Order of Dismissal

Previously the Court ordered Plaintiff Sherese Godschild, proceeding pro 

se, to file an amended complaint because her initial complaint (1) failed to

adequately allege a basis for the Court’s jurisdiction and (2) amounted to a 

shotgun pleading. (ECF Nos. 5.) In doing so, the Court warned Godschild that if 

she failed to provide facts establishing jurisdiction or remedy the defects in her 

pleading, her case would be dismissed. (Id.) Although Godschild has timely 

filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 6), she again fails to set forth facts 

establishing the Court’s jurisdiction and fails to appreciably address the 

pleading deficiencies previously identified. Accordingly, the Court dismisses

this case without prejudice.

As an initial matter, Godschild fails to set forth facts that would assure 

the Court it has jurisdiction over this case. To the extent Godschild’s intent is 

to proceed under the Court’s federal-question jurisdiction, her allegations fail. 

Although she repeatedly references the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, she 

neglects to include any allegations establishing, for starters, that either 

Defendant is even a debt collector. Further Godschild has affirmatively alleged 

that the damages she seeks are less than $75,000 thereby eliminating the 

Court’s diversity jurisdiction.

Additionally, Godschild has failed to heed the Court’s admonitions 

regarding the form of her complaint which continues to qualify as a shotgun 

pleading. Again, Godschild’s allegations are comprised of conclusory 

allegations, intermingled with disconnected facts, presented along a disjointed 

timeline of events. Once more Godschild also bunches all her claims and their 

supporting allegations into one giant, indivisible count. 

Accordingly, the Court dismisses this case without prejudice because 

Godschild has failed to establish the Court’s jurisdiction and has failed to 

address the complaint’s pleading deficiencies. As a result, this case is to 

remain closed. 

Case 0:22-cv-61723-RNS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/20/2023 Page 1 of 2
As an aside, the Court also advises Godschild that although it appears 

she cannot allege diversity jurisdiction, she can elect to proceed in state, rather 

than federal, court, where there is no need to establish diversity jurisdiction.

Done and ordered in Miami, Florida, on March 20, 2023.

________________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 0:22-cv-61723-RNS Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/20/2023 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 00-39] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Pub. L. 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/COMPT/RM, (703) 604-6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 00-39 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: May 30, 2000.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 35614)          ( print page 35615)          ( print page 35616)    

BILLING CODE 5001-10-M

[FR Doc. 00-13893  Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-10-C
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.1350)

 

Theundersigned executive officer of Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc. (the“Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-K/A for the fiscalyear ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedtherein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
|   | /s/ Teresa A. O’Quinn           |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  Teresa A. O’Quinn   |
|   | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date:  March 8, 2004

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toPeoples Community Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Peoples CommunityBancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
*

The Honorable William H. Stafford, Jr., Senior United States District Judge

for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation. 

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION 

File Name: 14a0501n.06

No. 13-4266

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

JOYCE ANN NIXON, )

)

Plaintiff-Appellant, )

)

v. ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

PATRICK R. DONAHOE, ) SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 

UNITED STATES POSTMASTER )

GENERAL, )

)

Defendant-Appellee. )

BEFORE: MOORE and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; STAFFORD, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. 

Joyce Ann Nixon appeals from the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of

Patrick R. Donahoe, the United States Postmaster General, on Nixon's claims of employment

discrimination based on gender and retaliation. We review a district court's grant of summary

judgment de novo. Gecewicz v. Henry Ford Macomb Hosp. Corp., 683 F.3d 316, 321 (6th Cir.

2012).

After carefully reviewing the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district

court's opinion adopting—and overruling Nixon's objections to—the report and recommendation,

the arguments of the parties on appeal, and the record in light of the parties' appellate briefing, we
are satisfied that the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Postmaster

General. Finding no reason to enter a duplicative opinion here, we AFFIRM the district court's

grant of summary judgment.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Foreign Investment and Arab Boycott Legislation

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	Ninety-Fourth Congress, 1975-1977. 						*Foreign Investment and Arab Boycott Legislation : Hearings Before the Subcommittee on International Finance of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-Fourth Congress, First Session on S. 425, Amendment No. 24 Thereto; S. 953, S. 995, and S. 1303, July 22 and 23, 1975*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										July 22 and 23, 1975,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/216,			accessed on August 28, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements No. 333-102601, 333-89892, 333-54836, 333-44626, 333-39366, 333-112912, 333-123979 and 333-130043 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 15, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedule of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2005. 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd. 

Beijing China 

March 15, 2006