alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 52.23 Counsel. ( a ) Applicants may be represented by counsel at their own expense. Applicants whose cases are processed under the Whistleblower Protection Act and who are granted a hearing by the Board may be entitled to representation by a Coast Guard law specialist. 10 U.S.C. 1034(f)(3)(A).
( b ) As used in this part, the term “counsel” includes attorneys who are members in good standing of any bar; accredited representatives of veterans' organizations recognized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 5902; and other persons who, in the opinion of the Chair, are competent to represent the applicant for correction. Whenever the term “applicant” is used in these rules, except in § 52.21(c), the term shall mean an applicant or his or her counsel.
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.350 Interim Document of Compliance certificate: what is it and when can it be used? ( a ) An Interim Document of Compliance certificate may be issued to help set up a company's safety management system when— ( 1 ) A company is newly set up or in transition from an existing company into a new company; or
( 2 ) A new type of vessel is added to an existing safety management system and Document of Compliance certificate for a company.
( b ) A responsible person for a company operating a U.S. vessel(s) that meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, may send a request to a recognized organization authorized to act on behalf of the U.S. to receive an Interim Document of Compliance certificate that is valid for a period up to 12 months. To be issued the Interim Document of Compliance certificate the vessel's company must— ( 1 ) Demonstrate to an auditor that the company has a safety management system that meets § 96.230 of this part; and
( 2 ) Provide a plan for full implementation of a safety management system within the period that the Interim Document of Compliance certificate is valid.
§ 230.17 Filing requirements. Five copies of draft, final and supplement EISs should be sent to: Director, Office of Federal Activities (A-104), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street SW., Washington, DC 20460. District commanders should file draft EISs and draft supplements directly with EPA. Final EISs and final supplements should be filed by appropriate elements within HQUSACE for feasibility and reevaluation reports requiring Congressional authorization. Division commanders should file final EISs and final supplements for all other Corps actions except for final EISs or final supplements for permit actions which should be filed by the district commander after appropriate reviews by division and the incorporation of division's comments in the EIS. HQUSACE and/or division will notify field office counterparts when to circulate the final EIS or final supplement and will file the final document with EPA after notified that distribution of the document has been accomplished. ( a ) *Timing requirements.* Specific timing requirements regarding the filing of EISs with EPA are discussed in 40 CFR 1506.10. District commanders will forward any expedited filing requests with appropriate supporting information through channels to CECW-RE. Once a decision is reached to prepare an EIS or supplement, district commanders will establish a time schedule for each step of the process based upon considerations listed in 40 CFR 1501.8 and upon other management considerations. The time required from the decision to prepare an EIS to filing the final EIS normally should not exceed one year (46 FR 18037, March 23, 1981). For feasibility, continuing authority, or reevaluation studies, where the project's study time is expected to exceed 12 months, the timing of the EIS should be commensurate with the study time. In appropriate circumstances where the costs of completing studies or acquiring information for an EIS (*i.e.*, cost in terms of money, time, or other resources) would be exorbitant, the district commander should consider using the mechanism described in 40 CFR 1502.22, as amended. In all cases, however, it is the district commander's responsibility to assure that the time-limit established for the preparation of an EIS or supplement is consistent with the purposes of NEPA.
( b ) *Timing requirements on supplements.* Minimum review periods will be observed for draft and final supplements covering actions not having a bearing on the overall project for which a final EIS has been filed. Such supplements should not curtail other ongoing or scheduled actions on the overall project which have already complied with the procedural requirements of NEPA.
Amelia



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 23, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00048

- CV

Buddy CASTEEL and Jaret Brandon Casteel, Appellant s

v.

Amelia STAYTON

, Appelle e
From the County Court, Real County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- 0138

- CC Garry A. Merritt, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On February 15, 2015 , th e trial c ourt granted , on its own motion, a new trial in the above styled and numbered cause. For this reason, i t is ORDERED appellant

, within fifteen days from the date of this order, withdraw the appeal or show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed on this Court’s own motion

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42

. 3

. All appellate deadlines are suspended until this time.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4990

To make appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for the Federal share of certain

construction costs of a sewage treatment facility in Waterbury, Connecticut.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To make appropriations for fiscal year 2001 for the Federal

share of certain construction costs of a sewage treatment

facility in Waterbury, Connecticut.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the following sums are appropriated, out of any

4 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fis5 cal year 2001:

6 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

7 STATE AND TRIBAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS

8 For an additional amount for ‘‘State and Tribal As9 sistance Grants’’, for a grant to the City of Waterbury,

10 Connecticut, for payment of the Federal share of a balloon
2

•HR 4990 IH

1 payment due by the City in July 2001 for the construction

2 of a sewage treatment facility, $2,800,000.

Æ
§ 52.64 Final action. ( a ) The Board, provided that it acts unanimously, may take final action on behalf of the Secretary, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 1552, as follows: ( 1 ) The Board may deny an application for the correction of military records.
( 2 ) Unless the Coast Guard, in submitting its views pursuant to § 52.42(b), identifies and describes a significant issue of Coast Guard policy challenged in the application, the Board may approve an application for the correction of military records in any of the following categories: ( i ) An application to correct an enlistment or reenlistment contract or agreement to extend an enlistment for the purpose of effecting or increasing entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus;
( ii ) An application to modify an election to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan;
( iii ) An application to change a reenlistment eligibility code;
( iv ) An application to correct the character of, or reason for, a discharge or separation; or
( v ) An application to receive a medal or award.
( 3 ) The Board may approve any application for correction of military records not included in one of the categories in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, if the Coast Guard recommends the same or substantially same relief as that requested by the applicant.
( b ) Except in cases where the Board takes final action under paragraph (a) of this section, the Board shall forward the record of its proceedings to the Secretary, who may approve, disapprove, or concur in the decision of the Board or the minority report, if any, either in whole or in part, and amend the order of the Board accordingly, or return the case to the Board for additional consideration. After taking final action, the Secretary shall send any such statement and the record of proceedings to the Board for disposition.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5139 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5139

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To provide for the conveyance of certain real property at the Carl 
 Vinson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5139

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide for the conveyance of certain real property at the Carl 
 Vinson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AT THE CARL VINSON DEPARTMENT 
              OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, DUBLIN, GEORGIA.

    (a) Conveyance to State Board of Regents.--The Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs shall convey, without consideration, to the Board of 
Regents of the State of Georgia all right, title, and interest of the 
United States in and to two tracts of real property, including any 
improvements thereon, at the Carl Vinson Department of Veterans Affairs 
Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia, consisting of 39 acres, more or less, 
in Laurens County, Georgia.
    (b) Conveyance to Community Service Board of Middle Georgia.--The 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall convey, without consideration, to 
the Community Service Board of Middle Georgia all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to three tracts of real property, 
including any improvements thereon, at the Carl Vinson Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia, consisting of 58 
acres, more or less, in Laurens County, Georgia.
    (c) Conditions on Conveyance.--The conveyance under subsection (a) 
shall be subject to the condition that the real property conveyed under 
that subsection be used in perpetuity solely for education purposes. 
The conveyance under subsection (b) shall be subject to the condition 
that the real property conveyed under that subsection be used in 
perpetuity solely for education and health care purposes.
    (d) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal description of the real 
property to be conveyed under this section shall be determined by a 
survey or surveys satisfactory to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 
The cost of any such survey shall not be borne by the Secretary.
    (e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs may require such additional terms and conditions in connection 
with the conveyances under this section as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 3, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 3.2 Compensation of Board.

Section 202(a)(1) of title 39 provides for the compensation of the Governors and for reimbursement for travel and reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board and its Committees. Compensation is provided for not more than 42 days of meetings per year.

[86 FR 10012, Feb. 18, 2021]
Merrimack

No. 78-213

#### Donna Liolis v. Franklin Zoning Board of Adjustment Clifton R. Farnum, Building Inspector

December 29, 1978

*Snierson, Chandler & McKean,*of Laconia *(John P. Chandler*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Fitzgerald & Sessler,*of Laconia *(Paul T. Fitzgerald*orally), for the defendants.

Memorandum Opinion

Plaintiff, a licensed hairdresser, seeks to open a hairdressing or beauty shop in her Franklin home. The home is in an 0-1 zone, which under the Franklin zoning ordinance permits “accessory uses” that are “incidental and subordinate to the principal use.” The board of adjustment found that the hairdressing occupation was a home occupation but not an accessory use, and denied the plaintiff a use permit. *929On agreed facts, the Master *(Robert A. Carignan,*Esq.) denied the plaintiff relief. Her exception was reserved by *Mullavey,*J. We reverse.

Section 608 of the ordinance defines “home occupations” as activities “such as” art studios, dressmaking or teaching, and, if these occupations comply with certain other conditions of the section, requires that these home occupations be permitted as accessory uses. Both parties agree that the plaintiff’s use will comply with the conditions of section 608; the use therefore must be permitted as an accessory use. The master’s ruling denying the plaintiff relief is clearly incorrect.

*Exceptions sustained.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip DeZwirek, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Phillip DeZwirek                             
|Phillip DeZwirek                                 
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|May 12, 2008                                     



23
From: Boethling, Bob

To: Schaeffer, John

Cc: Lewis, Paul

Subject: RE: 98-56-6 HPV 3 Request for EETD review of biodegradation final study report

Date: Thursday, May 02, 2013 5:57:48 PM

I reviewed this, and we can hope it is the last and concluding chapter in the long interaction on this

topic. The test was correctly run and the results are deemed reliable. The test substance showed

negligible degradation in a ready biodegradation test and is judged NRB (not readily

biodegradable), as predicted. Anything else you need? Let me know.

From: Schaeffer, John 

Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:44 AM

To: Boethling, Bob

Cc: Lewis, Paul

Subject: 98-56-6 HPV 3 Request for EETD review of biodegradation final study report

Bob, thank you for your review on ethanedioic acid – Now for your reward....

Attached for EETD’s review for adequacy is a final report for a biodegradation study for Benzene, 1-

chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)-(CASRN 98-56-6).

Please let me know when EETD might be able to complete its review for this study.

Thanks!

John

John Schaeffer

Senior Biologist

USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB

1201 Constitution Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Mail Code: 7405M

Phone: 202-564-8173
#### § 334.650 Gulf of Mexico, south of St. George Island, Fla.; test firing range.

(a) *The danger zone.* A fan-shaped area bounded as follows:

| | Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- | --- |
| NW corner— | 29°35′15′′ | 85°03′12′′ |
| SW corner— | 29°31′18′′ | 85°07′31′′ |
| SE corner— | 29°30′18′′ | 84°59′18′′ |
| NE corner— | 29°35′09′′ | 85°01′53′′ |

The seaward end of the area is an arc with a 10,500 meter radius with its center located on the south shore line of St. George Island 1,500 feet east of Cape St. George Light.

(b) *The regulations.*

(1) The area shall be used from sunrise to sunset daily Mondays through Fridays for test firing helicopter armament.

(2) During firing, the entire area plus 5 miles beyond in all directions shall be kept under surveillance by one control helicopter equipped with FM and UHF communications to the Safety Office at range control to insure cease fire if an aircraft or surface vessel is observed approaching the area.

(3) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, U.S. Army Aviation Test Board, Fort Rucker, Ala., and such agencies as he may designate.

[33 FR 4464, Mar. 13, 1968, as amended at 36 FR 15528, Aug. 17, 1971. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
**Exhibit 32(c)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1) | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Georgia Power Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

|   | /s/Michael D. Garrett

Michael D. Garrett

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Cliff S. Thrasher

Cliff S. Thrasher

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  |

 

Date:  May 4, 2006
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Walker C. Tompkins, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
-----------------------------------
Name:  Walker C. Tompkins, Jr.
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 14, 2002
§ 401.3 Maximum vessel dimensions. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, no vessel of more than 222.5 m in overall length or 23.8 m in extreme breadth shall transit.
( b ) No vessel shall transit if any part of the vessel or anything on the vessel extends more than 35.5 m above water level.
( c ) No vessel shall transit if any part of its bridges or anything on the vessel protrudes beyond the hull.
( d ) No vessel's hull or superstructure when alongside a lock wall shall extend beyond the limits of the lock wall, as illustrated in appendix I of this part.
( e ) A vessel having a beam width in excess of 23.2 m, but not more than 23.8 m, and having dimensions that do not exceed the limits set out in the block diagram in appendix I of this part or overall length in excess of 222.5 m, but not more than 225.5 m, shall, on application to the Manager or Corporation, be considered for transit in accordance with directions issued by the Manager and Corporation.
( f ) Vessels with beams greater than 23.20 m may be subject to transit restrictions and/or delays during periods of ice cover.
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended and secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of Sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471)
[39 FR 10900, Mar. 22, 1974, as amended at 45 FR 52377, Aug. 7, 1980; 47 FR 51121, Nov. 12, 1982; 48 FR 20690, May 9, 1983; 61 FR 19550, May 2, 1996; 65 FR 52913, Aug. 31, 2000; 70 FR 12970, Mar. 17, 2005]