alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-1043 

CHARLES L. EKSTAM, 

FUEL PREPORATOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

and EKSTAM WORLDWIDE, INC., 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

C. BRAD EKSTAM, 

DIESEL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC., 

and C. BRAD EKSTAM (doing business as Diesel Performance Products Co.), 

Defendants-Appellees. 

 Michael J. Thomas, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C., of St. Louis, Missouri, 

argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Kara R. Yancey. 

 James J. Kernell, Erickson, Kernell, Derusseau & Kleypas, LLC, of Overland 

Park, Kansas, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Lara L. 

McInerney and Michael Yakimo, Jr.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri 

Magistrate Judge Audrey G. Fleissig 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2008-1043 

CHARLES L. EKSTAM, 

FUEL PREPORATOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

and EKSTAM WORLDWIDE, INC., 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

C. BRAD EKSTAM, 

DIESEL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC., 

and C. BRAD EKSTAM (doing business as Diesel Performance Products Co.), 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri 

in CASE NO(S). 4:04-CV-00187 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

DATED July 14, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
#### § 3010.104 Consolidation and severance of proceedings.

The Commission may order proceedings involving related issues or facts to be consolidated for consideration of any or all matters at issue in such proceedings. The Commission may sever proceedings which have been consolidated or order separate proceedings on any issue presented if it appears that separate proceedings will be more convenient, expeditious, or otherwise appropriate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALASKA
AIRLINES INC. THIRD QUARTER 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           51800
<SECURITIES>                                     79400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   203900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      27600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                429600
<PP&E>                                         1059400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  317500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1268900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           484000
<BONDS>                                         255800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      356699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1268900
<SALES>                                        1004800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1004800
<CGS>                                           913800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   913800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               23600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  76600
<INCOME-TAX>                                     31300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              45300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     45300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 81.20 Lights and sound signal appliances. Each vessel under the 72 COLREGS, except the vessels of the Navy, is exempt from the requirements of the 72 COLREGS to the limitation for the period of time stated in Rule 38 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) if: ( a ) Her keel is laid or is at a corresponding stage of construction before July 15, 1977; and
( b ) She meets the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1960 (77 Stat. 194, 33 U.S.C. 1051-1094).
[CGD 76-133, 42 FR 35792, July 11, 1977. Redesignated at CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981]
EXHIBIT 99


<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                                   AGWAY INC.


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Agway Inc. (the  "Registrant"),  as filed
with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Michael R.
Hopsicker, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Michael R. Hopsicker
------------------------
Michael R. Hopsicker
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 20, 2003



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Registrant  for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                       2

<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                                   AGWAY INC.


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Agway Inc. (the  "Registrant"),  as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof,  I, Peter J.
O'Neill,  the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant  certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a)  or  15(d) of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Peter J. O'Neill
--------------------
Peter J. O'Neill
Senior Vice President, Finance & Control
May 20, 2003



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Registrant  for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                       3
#### Ewald’s Executor v. City of Louisville. Commonwealth v. Ewald’s Executor.

(Decided October 17, 1916.)

Appeals from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

HODGES *&*JAMES and TRABUE, DOOLAN & COX for appellant.

PENDLETON BECKLEY, G. CARY TABB and STUART CHEVALIER for appellee, City of Louisville.

GIBSON *&*CRAWFORD for appellee, Fidelity & Columbia Trust Company.

Response to Petition eor Rehearing by

Judge Carroll.

In response to the petition for rehearing filed by counsel for the Ewald estate, so much of the opinion in these cases that may be found in 168 Ky. 71, as recites that “The judgment in each case is affirmed by a divided court,” is withdrawn, because it does not correctly represent the views of the members of the court as set out in the opinion.

On a reconsideration of the cases the members of the court adhere to the conclusions ascribed to them in the opinion, and this being so it will be seen that Judges Settle, Hurt, Thomas and Carroll are of the opinion that the money sought to be taxed had a situs for taxation in Lyon county, and not in the city of Louisville, at the assessing periods in 1903, 1904 and 1905, and that all the court except Judge Thomas are of the opinion that it had a situs for taxation in the city of Louisville at the assessing periods in 1906 and 1907. It results from this that so much of the judgment as holds that the money *510liad a situs for taxation in Louisville in 1904, 1905 and 1906 must be reversed. In other respects the judgment is affirmed, as Lyon county is not seeking- in these cases to tax the money in that county for the years 1904, 1905 and 1906.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions to enter a judgment in conformity with this opinion.
§ 775.4 Definitions. ( a ) The definitions set forth in 40 CFR part 1508 apply to this part 775.
( b ) In addition to the terms defined in 40 CFR part 1508, the following definitions apply to this part:
*Approving official* means the person or group of persons, who authorizes funding as established through the delegations of approval authority issued by the finance organization. That person or group of persons may not have proposed the action for which financial approval is sought.
*Environmental checklist* means a Postal Service form that identifies potential environmental impacts for proposed actions initiated by postal managers.
*Mitigated FONSI* means a FONSI which requires the implementation of specified mitigation measures in order to ensure that there are no significant impacts to the environment.
*Record of environmental consideration* means the Postal Service form that identifies the Postal Service's review of proposed activities under NEPA.
*Responsible official* means the person, or designated representative, who proposes an action and is responsible for compliance with NEPA. For larger projects, that person may not have the financial authority to approve such action. The responsible official signs the NEPA documents (FONSI, ROD) and the REC.
[63 FR 45719, Aug. 27, 1998]
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-84738 on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement Nos. 333-34370, 333-47126,333-72574, 333-72568, 333-100456, 333-109302, 333-110055, 333-120607 and 333-128858 on Form S-8 of our reports dated July 26, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Palm, Inc. and subsidiaries andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Palm, Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2006. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

San Jose, California 

July 26, 2006
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook in Foundry Occupations

              																	Labbie, Claire Lois					,	Lewis, Richard H.					,	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics					 and 	Winegarden, Calman R. (Calman Robert). 						*Employment Outlook in Foundry Occupations : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 880*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1946,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4335,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

h0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144901

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144901

COA: 300363

Livingston CC: 09-018103-FH

ZACKORY SCOTT RAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4817

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide that annuities

paid by States to blind veterans shall be disregarded in determining

supplemental security income benefits.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 10, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide

that annuities paid by States to blind veterans shall

be disregarded in determining supplemental security income benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STATE ANNUITIES FOR BLIND VETERANS TO BE

4 DISREGARDED IN DETERMINING SUPPLE5 MENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS.

6 (a) INCOME DISREGARD.—Section 1612(b) of the So7 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382a(b)) is amended—
2

•HR 4817 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

2 (21);

3 (2) by striking the period at the end of para4 graph (22) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

5 (3) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(23) any annuity paid by a State to the indi7 vidual (or such spouse) on the basis of the individual

8 being a veteran (as defined in section 101 of title

9 38, United States Code) who is blind.’’.

10 (b) RESOURCE DISREGARD.—Section 1613(a) of

11 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382b(a)) is amended—

12 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

13 (12);

14 (2) by striking the period at the end of para15 graph (13) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

16 (3) by inserting after paragraph (13) the fol17 lowing:

18 ‘‘(14) for the month of receipt and every month

19 thereafter, any annuity paid by a State to the indi20 vidual (or such spouse) on the basis of the individual

21 being a veteran (as defined in section 101 of title

22 38, United States Code) who is blind.’’.
3

•HR 4817 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to benefits paid for months begin3 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.50-1 Scope. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart shall apply to the structures which are located within the boundaries of the Coast Guard districts hereinafter defined.
( b ) Geographic coordinates expressed in terms of latitude or longitude, or both, are not intended for plotting on maps or charts whose referenced horizontal datum is the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83), unless such geographic coordinates are expressly labeled NAD 83. Geographic coordinates without the NAD 83 reference may be plotted on maps or charts referenced to NAD 83 only after application of the appropriate corrections that are published on the particular map or chart being used.
[CGD 86-082, 52 FR 33810, Sept. 8, 1987]
#### § 175.125 Serviceability.

No person may use a boat unless each signal required by § 175.110 is in serviceable condition and the service life of the signal, if indicated by a date marked on the signal, has not expired.

[CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13926, Mar. 28, 1996, as amended by USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34715, June 29, 1999]
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

37 38 39 40 41


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/09 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       7,334,572
<SECURITIES>                               115,769,829
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,789,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (309,746)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           135,115,869
<PP&E>                                      17,448,593
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,642,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             161,698,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       81,096,097
<BONDS>                                     43,457,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,034,897
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,109,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               161,698,726
<SALES>                                      6,825,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,504,575
<CGS>                                        4,980,627
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,980,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,323,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,105,766
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,217
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,679
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,538
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY HAS RESTATED EARNINGS PER SHARE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
SFAS NO. 128.  BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 WAS RESTATED TO $.30. DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 WAS RESTATED TO $.27.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 20.303 Form and content of filed documents. ( a ) Each filed document must clearly— ( 1 ) State the title of the case;
( 2 ) State the docket number of the case, if one has been assigned;
( 3 ) Designate the type of filing (for instance: petition, notice, or motion to dismiss);
( 4 ) Identify the filing party by name and capacity acted in; and
( 5 ) State the address, telephone number, and any fax number of the filing party and, if that party is represented, the name, address, telephone number, and any fax number of the representative.
( b ) Each filed document must— ( 1 ) Measure 81 ⁄ 2 by 11 inches, except that a table, chart, or other attachment may be larger if folded to the size of the filed document to which it is physically attached;
( 2 ) Be printed on just one side of the page and be clearly typewritten, printed, or otherwise reproduced by a process that yields legible and permanent copies;
( 3 ) Be double-spaced except for footnotes and long quotations, which may be single-spaced;
( 4 ) Have a left margin of at least 11 ⁄ 2 inches and other margins of at least 1 inch; and
( 5 ) Be bound on the left side, if bound.
( c ) Each filed document must be in English or, if in another language, accompanied by a certified translation. The original of each filed document must be signed by the filing party or her or his representative. Unless the rules in this part or the ALJ requires it to be verified or accompanied by an affidavit, no filed document need be. The signature constitutes a certification by the signer that she or he has read the document; that, to the best of her or his knowledge, information, and belief, the statements made in it are true; and that she or he does not intend it to cause delay.
( d ) Complaints, answers, and simple motions may employ forms approved for use in proceedings of the Coast Guard instead of the format set out in this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Credco's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 1998 and
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months
ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,486
<SECURITIES>                                       218
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                       626
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         19,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,632
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   540
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   197
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     86
<INCOME-TAX>                                        30
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 56
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        56
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>