alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

p0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146482

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146482

COA: 300214

Wayne CC: 09

- 029532

- FC

JAMAR PINKNEY, SR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board
Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 3 NASS, USDA



Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 7 NASS, USDA

Stocks in Cold Storage: By Commodity, Region,

and United States, April 30, 1999 (continued)

Commodity

East

South

Central

West

South

Central
Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 8 NASS, USDA

Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 10 NASS, USDA
Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 11 NASS, USDA

Stocks in Cold Storage: By Commodity, Region,
Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 12 NASS, USDA
Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 13 NASS, USDA
Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 14 NASS, USDA
Cold Storage Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 15 NASS, USDA

Survey Procedures: Questionnaires are mailed about the 24th of each month to all operators on

the list of approximately 1,400 public and private cold storage warehouses. In addition, apple data

are obtained from special surveys and other sources (State Departments of Agriculture, U.S. Apple

Association, etc.). All survey data represent stocks as of the end of the month.

Data are collected from warehouses artificially cooled to a temperature of 50 degrees Fahrenheit or

lower, and whose food products are normally stored for 30 days or more. All food items in these

facilities are reported regardless of the number of days stored at the time of the report. Also

included are specialized storage facilities meeting the 30 day requirement, such as fruit houses,

dairy manufacturing plants, frozen fruit, fruit juice, and vegetable processors, and poultry and meat

packing plants. Excluded are stocks in space maintained by wholesalers, jobbers, distributors, chain
The next "Cold Storage" report will be released at 3 p.m. ET on July 20, 1999.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on the basis

of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital

or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should

contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).

To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten

Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice

or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
From: c d

To: Dianne Valdez

Cc: Bailyn, Jonathan (USAFLS)

Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Victim Letter, docket 1:22CR20326-1, Lorquet

Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 6:47:23 PM

Good evening,

I do apologize for the late email, however after speaking with my attorney and analyzing my

loss. I decline moving forward with restitution, even though I took a loss, this situation has

taught me a valuable lesson personally and brought forth protocols that my business lacked. I

do appreciate you reaching out to me, however this is a chapter I would like to close.

Thank you

On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 1:39 PM Dianne Valdez <dianne_valdez@flsp.uscourts.gov> wrote:

Good Afternoon M . D ,

As per out conversation, please provide any information regarding restitution you believe is

owed to you along with supporting documentation. Should you have any questions or

concerns, please feel free to reach out.

Regards,

Dianne Valdez

U.S. Probation Officer

Southern District of Florida

Office: (305) 523-5364

Cell: (786) 368-4575

Fax: (305) 523-5496

Email: dianne_valdez@flsp.uscourts.gov

"The brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear." -Nelson Mandela

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 70-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 70-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2023 Page 2 of 2
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

119)IV-K-(B)-14 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 3:22:18 PM Sheet 119 of 198 
r 

P.2 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, INC. 

1655 NORTH FORT MYER DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209 703/528-1900 IV-K-(B)-1 4 

January 30, 1987 

Mr. Robert Pahel-Short 

Economic Analysis Branch (MD-12) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

Subject: EPA Contract No. 68-02-4202, Work Assignment No. 18 

Sulfur Content of Distillate Fuel Oil 

Dear Robert: 

The attached table summarizes the average annual sulfur content of 

distillate fuel oil purchased by selected electric utility companies for 

1983 and 1985. D0E/EIA publishes annual data for individual electric 

utility companies. One of the data items is the average sulfur content 

for all petroleum purchases, including distillate and residual fuel oil. 

The attached table includes electric utility companies which purchased 

distillate fuel oil, but no residual fuel oil, in 1983 and 1985. The 

range is 0.17-0.50 percent sulfur. 

Please call me if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Tim Hogan ' ' 

TH:lmh 

Enclosure 

cc: Dr. A. Wehe 

MANAGEMENT / ECONOMICS / ENGINEERING 
P.3 

AVERAGE ANNUAL SULFUR CONTENT OF DISTILLATE FUEL OIL 

PURCHASED BY SELECTED ELECTRIC UTILITY COMPANIESa 

(percent sulfur) 

Electric Utility Company 1985 1983 

Alabama Power Company 

Carolina Power and Light 

Cincinnati Gas and Electric Co. 

Duquesne Light 

Indianapolis Power and Light 

Kansas City Power and Light 

Monongahela Power 

Ohio Edison 

Pennsylvania Electric 

Pennsylvania Power 

Public Service of Indiana 

Salt River Project 

Seminole Electric Power 

Tennessee Valley Authority 

Wisconsin Electric Power 

0.19 

0.20 

0.40 

0.17 

0.30 

0.41 

0.30 

0.37 

0.23 

0.24 

0.30 

0.44 

0.24 

0.50 

0.29 

0.20 

0.20 

0.32 

0.17 

0.28 

0.47 

0.30 

0.45 

0.17 

0.41 

0.30 

0.34 

0.17 

0.49 

0.25 

a U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. 

Cost and Quality of Fuels for Electric Utility Plants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-22336-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

RAY BUENO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ALPINE FUNDING PARTNERS, LLC., 

Defendant. 

________________________________/ 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, ECF No. [9] 

(“Notice”), filed on August 26, 2022. The Court has carefully reviewed the Notice, the record in 

this case, and is otherwise fully advised. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as 

follows: 

1. The Notice, ECF No. [9], is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 

2. The above-styled case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 

3. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs; 

4. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, all pending motions are denied as MOOT

and all deadlines are TERMINATED; 

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on September 22, 2022. 

____ ____________________________ 

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to: Counsel of Record 

Case 1:22-cv-22336-BB Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 1 of 1
Col. Forrest L. Marion, USAFR (ret.) 

Col. Jon T. Hoffman, USMCR (ret.)

Foreword by

Lt. Gen. Dennis M. McCarthy, USMC (ret.)

former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs

A TOTAL FORCE

The Evolution of the Guard and Reserve

FORGING
§ 80.1122 Channel Islands Harbor, CA. ( a ) A line drawn from Channel Islands Harbor South Jetty Light 2 to Channel Islands Harbor Breakwater South Light 1.
( b ) A line drawn from Channel Islands Harbor Breakwater North Light to Channel Islands Harbor North Jetty Light 5.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROBERT WALKER
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3419

[ November 10, 2021 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Fifteen th Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Jeffrey Dana Gillen , Judge ; L.T. Case No.

2017CF000293AMB

.

Carol Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant

.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear,

Senior Assi stant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 52.67 Reconsideration. ( a ) Reconsideration of an application for correction of a military record shall occur if an applicant requests it and the request meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section. ( 1 ) An applicant presents evidence or information that was not previously considered by the Board and that could result in a determination other than that originally made. Such new evidence or information may only be considered if it could not have been presented to the Board prior to its original determination if the applicant had exercised reasonable diligence; or
( 2 ) An applicant presents evidence or information that the Board, or the Secretary as the case may be, committed legal or factual error in the original determination that could have resulted in a determination other than that originally made.
( b ) The Chair shall docket a request for reconsideration of a final decision if it meets the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section. If neither of these requirements is met, the Chair shall not docket such request.
( c ) The Board shall consider each application for reconsideration that has been docketed. None of the Board members who served on the Board that considered an applicant's original application for correction shall serve on the Board that decides the applicant's application upon reconsideration.
( d ) Action by the Board on a docketed application for reconsideration is subject to §§ 52.26 and 52.64(b).
( e ) An applicant's request for reconsideration must be filed within two years after the issuance of a final decision, except as otherwise required by law. If the Chair dockets an applicant's request for reconsideration, the two-year requirement may be waived if the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to consider the request despite its untimeliness.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-13,444-17

EX P ARTE DARIUS DURON ELAM, A ppl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 380350-I IN THE 232 DISTRICT COURT N D F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . Ke el, J. not participating. O R D E R Pursuant to the provision s o f Ar t i cle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex

. C ri m . Ap p. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g rava ted robber y and sentenc ed t o life imprisonment. The Four teenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Elam v. State , No. 14-84-00394- CR (Tex. App.—Houston [ 14 ] J une 12, 1986). t h Applicant contends, among other things, t h at n ewly available DNA evidenc e proves he is actua lly innocent. He also alleg es that the DN A evidence entitles him to relief under Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e §11.073. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts tha t, if true, might entitle him to relief

. I n these circ umstances,2

additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. The trial court may order depositions, interrog atories or a hear ing. I t appea rs that Applicant is repre sented by

counsel. I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall dete rmine if Applica nt is repr esente d by cou n s el , an d if not, whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant at the hea ring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusion s o f l aw re g arding whether new DNA lab repor

ts suppor t his contention that he is e ntitled to relief

. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant an d ap p ro p ri ate to the dispositi on of Applica

nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental t ra n s cr i p t containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of t he date of this order. A ny extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court.

Filed: April 3, 2019 Do not publish
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Leonard Borow, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aeroflex Incorporated,
hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of Aeroflex Incorporated for the period ended
December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Aeroflex Incorporated.





/s/ Leonard BorowName:  Leonard
      BorowPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  February
      9, 2011




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Aeroflex Incorporated and will be retained by Aeroflex Incorporated and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**EXHIBIT 31.1	**Certifications

 

I,Thomas Kidrin, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Worlds Inc.;

 

2. Based onmy knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

3. Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

 

4. The registrant'sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

  

c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

d) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant'sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 11,2011

 

/s/ ThomasKidrin

Thomas Kidrin

Chief Executive Officer
Ex-99.2 a)

                                                                    EXHIBIT 1

                  MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION CONCERNING COMPLIANCE
                      WITH USAP MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS

March 26, 2001


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, GMAC Mortgage Corporation and
its subsidiaries (the "Company") have complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards (the "Standards") set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $150,000,000 and $50,000,000,
respectively.


/s/ David Applegate
---------------------------------
David Applegate
Chairman and CEO


/s/ Tony Renzi
---------------------------------
Tony Renzi
Senior Vice President of
Servicing Administration
§ 97.115 Reporting lost or jettisoned cargo. ( a ) In the event a vessel loses or jettisons at sea any cargo described in paragraph (b) of this section, it must comply with the immediate notification requirements of 33 CFR 160.216, and if the cargo contains hazardous material as defined in paragraph (c) of this section, the vessel must also report it as soon as possible in accordance with 49 CFR 176.48.
( b ) The cargo to which this section applies includes any container and any other cargo the loss or jettisoning of which could adversely affect the safety of any vessel, bridge, structure, or shore area or the environmental quality of any port, harbor, or navigable waterway of the United States.
( c ) As used in this section, “hazardous material” means a substance or material designated by the Secretary of Transportation as capable of posing an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property when transported in commerce. The term includes hazardous substances, hazardous wastes, marine pollutants, and elevated temperature materials as defined in 49 CFR 171.8, materials designated as hazardous under the provisions of 49 CFR 172.101, and materials that meet the defining criteria for hazard classes and divisions in 49 CFR part 173.
[USCG-2000-7080, 81 FR 28014, May 9, 2016; 81 FR 59136, Aug. 29, 2016]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES 

OCTAVIO COLLADO COLLECTIVE ACTION

For himself and all others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC, 

d/b/a KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC, and 

ROMAN JONES, 

Defendants. 

____________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO RESCHEDULE MEDIATION 

THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Parties Joint Motion to Reschedule 

Mediation. The Court having reviewed the Motion and being otherwise fully advised in the 

premises, hereby: 

ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that the Parties Joint Motion to Reschedule Mediation is 

GRANTED. The Parties shall reschedule the mediation presently set for July 26, 2023 to the new 

date of October 5, 2023. 

DONE AND ORDERED this _____ day of July, 2023 in Miami, Florida. 

 __________________________________ 

JUDGE BETH BLOOM 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

cc: All Counsel of Record 

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 165-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/20/2023 Page 1 of 1