alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ferro's Entertainment and Production LLC

Account Holder: Orlando Ferro, Yerry Ferro Jr

Ferro's Entertainment and 

Production LLC

Ferro's Entertainment and 

Production LLC

Account Signer(s): Orlando Ferro, Yerry Ferro Jr Orlando Ferro, Dulce Figueroa Orlando Ferro, Dulce Figueroa

Bank: TD Ameritrade Space Coast Credit Union Space Coast Credit Union

Account Number: 8410 6436 6444

Account Type: Joint Tenants in Common Business Savings Business Free Checking

Date Opened: 5/4/2007 8/4/2020 8/4/2020

Statements Received: 1/1/2020 - 8/31/2022 8/4/2020 - 12/31/2021 8/4/2020 - 11/30/2021

Bank Accounts

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-41 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
### Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician Notch Peak Formation in western Utah

By: L. F. HintzeM.E. TaylorJ.F. Miller

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1393

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Upper Cambrian-Lower Ordovician Notch Peak Formation in western Utah(1980)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Frank E. SIPLE, Petitioner, v. William H. BANNAN, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan, Jackson, Michigan, Respondent.

No. 17626.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 12, 1958.

Frank E. Siple, Jackson, Mich., appellant, in pro. per.

Before STEWART, Circuit Judge.

STEWART, Circuit Judge.

Frank Siple is confined under a sentence of life imprisonment imposed by a Michigan court upon his plea of guilty of having murdered his daughter by poison. An application in the district court for a writ of habeas corpus was denied after a hearing in which Siple and witnesses on his behalf were fully heard, and he was represented by counsel. There is now before the undersigned a motion for the issuance of a certificate of probable cause to appeal. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253. Such a certificate was denied by the district judge, who nevertheless commendably ordered that a transcript of the proceedings in the district court be made available at government expense for the purpose of the present motion.

Although this is a sad and puzzling case, a painstaking examination of the voluminous documents submitted by Siple and the transcript of the hearing in the district court leaves me convinced that Siple’s confinement is not the result of any denial of Federal Constitutional *551rights. Siple’s guilty plea in the Michigan court stemmed from an oral confession he had made to state officers the previous day. That this confession occurred while he was without counsel is clear. That he had asked for and been denied counsel is asserted. Even if the assertion be true, the denial of counsel at that time did not of itself constitute a Constitutional deprivation. Crooker v. State of California, 357 U.S. 433, 78 S.Ct. 1287, 2 L.Ed.2d 1448; Cicenia v. La Gay, 357 U.S. 504, 78 S.Ct. 1297, 2 L.Ed.2d 1523.

Siple’s further contentions that his confession was coerced, and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel in subsequent judicial proceedings are simply not supported by the record. No physical coercion, trickery, or fraud in obtaining the confession are alleged, but only Siple’s subjective concern for his wife’s predicament in the event he did not confess. As to the second contention, the record shows that Siple was represented by a lawyer of his own or his family’s choosing at the time preliminary examination in the justice court was waived, and also at the arraignment and sentence in the circuit court.

The motion for a certificate of probable cause is denied.
EXHIBIT D 

Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 1 of 3
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 2 of 3
Case 9:22-cv-81534-AHS Document 12-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/04/2022 Page 3 of 3
Good morning, I'm Mark Burger, a resident of Oak Park, and I appreciate 

this opportunity to testify in favor of the USEPA and DOT's proposed 

second phase reduction of carbon pollution and oil use from heavy-duty 

freight trucks. I live right by the Eisenhower Expressway and emission 

from the constant flow of trucks reminds me of the fuel waste and 

health effects to my household and my neighbors. 

The proposed standards will result in significant pollution reduction 

and increase in health benefits as my fellow supporters will testify. I 

want to emphasize the economic benefits that improved truck fuel 

efficiency standards will bring. Improved fu el efficiency standards 

resulting in demand destruction are one of the best tools to reduce 

pollution and keep fuel prices affordable. The fuel efficiency standards 

of cars and light trucks resulted in the present savings of 3-4 million 

barrels of oil a day in the U.S. Had these standards not been in place, 

pollution from an additional billion or more barrels of petroleum a year 

would be in our atmosphere, as well as higher prices for gasoline and 

diesel. Adoption of improved truck fuel efficiency standards is our best 

protection against future risk factors, higher costs, and pollution. 

There are five risk factors to fuel prices in the near and long term. First 

is possible global pricing of carbon emissions. At $25-50/MT, that can 

mean adding $10-20 to the price of a barrel of oil, or up to 25-50 cents 

per gallon of fue l. The second global risk factor is a geopolitical event up 

to and including warfare that can disrupt or interrupt oil and gas 

shipments. Last is declining rates of extraction, by cost or available 

resource. 

For US supply and pricing, there are two major risks to oil and gas 

prices and supply. First is lifting the ban on petroleum exports and 

development of robust infrastructure to facilitate shipment, especially 

for liquefied natural gas. The result will be likely be US prices of oil and 

gas moving up toward global market prices. At present, that is only 

about a 10% spread between Brent and West Texas Intermediate 

petroleum prices. The greater risk is US natural gas prices rising to 

European or Asian levels of two to four times greater. 

The other risk factor is shale extraction of petroleum and natural gas 

may be far more short-lived than traditional extraction. Combined with 
exports to higher priced markets puts the US gasoline and diesel 

consumer at greater risk. It also neutralizes the premise that shifting 

heavy truck fuel from diesel to natural gas will be a cost saver, without 

higher efficiency standards. 

So for these economic as well as environmental reasons, I support and 

applaud the proposal by the EPA and DOT to improve our nation's 

heavy truck fuel efficiency standards. Thank you. 

(Information sources- US EIA. Inti Monetary Fund, Fortune, BP) 

Mark Burger, burgermkop@gmail.com.
#### WILLIAM DONALDSON, Respondent, *v.*JAMES H. TRUESDELL, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Westchester County Court affirming a judgment of a justice of the peace in favor of the plaintiff.

The action was brought to recover on a check given by defendant, and claimed by him to he an accommodation cheek, and for which defendant claimed that the plaintiff, the indorsee, had not given any value. The General Term was of opinion that there was proof from which the justice was justified in finding that value had been given for the check, and affirmed the judgment.

*144
      *J. S. Millard,*for the appellant.

*Wm. F. Purdy,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 25.121 Effect of other payments to claimant. The total amount to which the claimant may be entitled is normally computed as follows: ( a ) The total amount of the loss, damage, or personal injury suffered for which the United States is liable, less any payment the claimant has received from the following sources: ( 1 ) The military member or civilian employee who caused the incident;
( 2 ) The military member's or civilian employee's insurer; and
( 3 ) Any joint tort-feasor or insurer.
( b ) No deduction is generally made for any payment the claimant has received by way of voluntary contributions, such as donations of charitable organizations.
# Presidential Determination on Assistance for Peacekeeping in Sierra Leone

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                    Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President, including under section 10(d)(1) of the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287*et seq*.) (the “Act”), I hereby determine that the furnishing, without regard to section 10(a) of the Act, of assistance covered by section 10 of the Act that is provided in support of peacekeeping efforts in Sierra Leone is important to the security interests of the United States.                

                    You are authorized and directed to report this determination to the Congress and to publish it in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 00-14619

Billing code 4710-10-M
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies
to my knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the
Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.








By
                      /s/  Walter C.
      JohnsenWalter C.
      JohnsenChairman
      of the Board andChief
      Executive Officer


Dated:  August
12, 2010













A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and
will be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### SERVED: October 7, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF AERO MICRONESIA FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0468
IN THE MATTER OF AERO MICRONESIA FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0469 AMENDED HEARING NOTICE t**~** :';

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered on December 1, 2 and 3, 2014, inclusive, in the U.S. District Court, District ofHawaii 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 1• The hearing will commence at 0730 a.m. on December 1, 2014. The schedule for December 2 and 3, 2014 will be determined on December 1, 2014. Counsel may presentthe cases in any sequence them deem appropriate.!.

## ,--~~:)::::~·-

## /'**(-·~r··--c,!**

# J; "

('-**n~t-v··-** 

## :· , \ "" 1
......... ,,r**~t,..** '···
. (,

__,.>________ - ...**u'"-·~-.J** .,,"' Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

1 As ofthe date ofthis notice a courtroom has not been assigned. Parties should checkthe Court Calendar the dayofthe hearing for the exact courtroom. The parties may also check with the Clerk's Office.CORRECTED ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### David M. Kirstein and Lyndsey M. Grunewald Kirstein & 

### Young, PLLC, Respondent's Counsel 

### 1750 K Street, N.W., Suite 200 Washington, DC 20006 TEL: 202-331-3348 FAX: 202-331-3933 Michael 

### R. Quinn, President Aero Micronesia, Inc. dbaAsiaPacific Airlines, Inc., Respondent 

### 156 Diablo Road, Suite 203 Danville, CA 94526 TEL: 925-362-4430 · FAX: 925-362-4432 Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office oftheRegional Counsel, AWP-7 PO Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS NOS. FAA-2012-0468 & FAA-2012-0469 (Civil Penalty Actions)

1Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
2
§ 51.2 Authority. ( a ) The Secretary of Homeland Security has the authority to establish a Discharge Review Board (DRB) to review the discharge of a former member of the United States Coast Guard under the provisions of 10 U.S.C. 1553. This part prescribes the establishment and outlines the procedures of the Coast Guard Discharge Review Board. The Secretary retains the authority to review and take final action on the DRB's findings in the following cases: ( 1 ) Those cases in which a minority of the board requests that their written opinion be forwarded to the Secretary for consideration;
( 2 ) Those cases selected by the Commandant to inform the Secretary of aspects of the board's functions which may be of interest to the Secretary;
( 3 ) Any case in which the Secretary demonstrates an interest;
( 4 ) Any case which the President of the board believes is of significant interest to the Secretary.
( b ) The Commandant of the Coast Guard is delegated the authority to: ( 1 ) Appoint members to serve on the Discharge Review Board;
( 2 ) Appoint alternates to serve on the DRB in the event that a regularly appointed member is unavailable;
( 3 ) Designate a member as the President of the DRB; and
( 4 ) Review and take final action on all DRB decisions which are not reviewed by the Secretary.
[CGD 81-104, 50 FR 41495, Oct. 11, 1985, as amended by CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33362, June 19, 1997; USCG-2003-14505, 68 FR 9535, Feb. 28, 2003]
**Exhibit 32(e)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and            |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mississippi Power Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/Anthony J.Topazi

Anthony J. Topazi

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Frances Turnage

Frances V. Turnage

Vice President, Treasurer and

Chief Financial Officer

         |

 

 

Date:  May 7, 2007
§ 89.25 Waters upon which Inland Rules 9(a)(ii), 14(d), and 15(b) apply. Inland Rules 9(a)(ii), 14(d), and 15(b) apply on the Great Lakes, the Western Rivers, and the following specified waters: ( a ) Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway.
( b ) Tombigbee River.
( c ) Black Warrior River.
( d ) Alabama River.
( e ) Coosa River.
( f ) Mobile River above the Cochrane Bridge at St. Louis Point.
( g ) Flint River.
( h ) Chattahoochee River.
( i ) The Apalachicola River above its confluence with the Jackson River.
[CGD 91-050, 58 FR 27625, May 10, 1993, as amended by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014]
Exhibit 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Schimatic Cash
Transactions Network.com, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Bernard F. McHale, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: February 8, 2008                By: /s/ Bernard F. McHale
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Bernard F. McHale
                                           Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4996

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the reduction

in the market basket percentage increase under the prospective payment

system under the Medicare Program for payments to small rural hospitals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mrs. EMERSON) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee

concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate

the reduction in the market basket percentage increase

under the prospective payment system under the Medicare Program for payments to small rural hospitals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4996 IH

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF RURAL HOSPITAL MARKET

2 BASKET INCREASE PERCENTAGE REDUC3 TION.

4 Subclauses (XVI) and (XVII) of section

5 1886(b)(3)(B)(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

6 1395ww(b)(3)(B)(i)) are amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(XVI) for fiscal year 2001, the market basket

8 percentage increase minus 1.1 percentage points for

9 hospitals (other than sole community hospitals and

10 hospitals located in a rural area with less than 100

11 beds) in all areas, and the market basket percentage

12 increase for sole community hospitals and hospitals

13 located in a rural area with less than 100 beds,

14 ‘‘(XVII) for fiscal year 2002, the market basket

15 percentage increase minus 1.1 percentage points for

16 hospitals (other than hospitals located in a rural

17 area with less than 100 beds) in all areas and the

18 market basket percentage increase hospitals located

19 in a rural area with less than 100 beds, and’’.

Æ
<PAGE>





                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express
Credit Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Paul H. Hough, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.


/s/ Paul H. Hough
------------------------
Name:    Paul H. Hough
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    August 11, 2005


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under
that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.