UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                         AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO FORM 10-KSB

                 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                     FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

                          COMMISSION FILE NO. 000-30486

                   ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

                FLORIDA                                  65-0738251
--------------------------------------   ---------------------------------------
    (State or other jurisdiction of         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     Incorporation or organization)

                    420 LEXINGTON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10170
                    (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

                                 (646) 227-1600
                         (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER)

              SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:

                   TITLE OF EACH CLASS TO BE REGISTERED: NONE

           SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:

            COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE, 200,000,000 SHARES AUTHORIZED

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
1934  during  the  preceding  12 months  (or for such  shorter  period  that the
registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days [X]Yes [ ]No

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent  filers  pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained  herein,  and will not be contained,
to the best of  Registrant's  knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or  information
statements  incorporated  by  reference  in Part III of this Form  10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB.   [ ]Yes  [ ]No

<PAGE>

         The aggregate market value as of November 15, 2002 of the voting common
equity held by non-affiliates is $1,188,526.

              APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
                     PROCEEDINGS DURING PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

         Indicate by checkmark  whether the  Registrant  has filed all documents
and  reports to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange
Act of 1934 subsequent to the  distribution of securities under a plan confirmed
by a court.

                           YES ____      NO ____

                    APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

         Indicate the number of shares  outstanding of each of the  Registrant's
classes of common stock, as of the latest  practicable  date. As of November 15,
2002, there were  118,852,622  shares of the Company's no par value common stock
issued and outstanding.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

         Information  required  by Items 1 and 2 of Part I and Item 7 of Part II
of this  Report is  incorporated  by  reference  from the  Registrant's  Amended
Registration Statement filed on June 14, 2002.

         This Form 10-KSB contains "forward-looking  statements" relating to the
Registrant  which  represent the  Registrant's  current  expectations or beliefs
including,  but not limited to, statements concerning  Registrant's  operations,
performance,  financial  condition and growth.  For this purpose,  any statement
contained in this Form 10-KSB that are not  statements  of  historical  fact are
forward-looking  statements.  Without  limiting the generality of the foregoing,
words  such  as  "may",   "anticipation",   "intend",  "could",  "estimate",  or
"continue"  or the  negative or other  comparable  terminology  are  intended to
identify  forward-looking  statements.  These statements by their nature involve
substantial  risks and  uncertainties,  such as  credit  losses,  dependence  on
management and key personnel and  variability of quarterly  results,  ability of
Registrant to continue its growth strategy and competition, certain of which are
beyond  the  Registrant's  control.  Should  one  or  more  of  these  risks  or
uncertainties  materialize or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual outcomes and results could differ  materially from those indicated in the
forward-looking statements.

                                       i
<PAGE>

                   ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                  FORM 10-K-SB
                                TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I.........................................................................1
       Item 1. Business........................................................1
       Item 2. Description Of Property.........................................8
       Item 3. Legal Proceedings...............................................8
       Item 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders............11
PART II.......................................................................12
       Item 5. Market For Common Equity And Related Stockholder Matters.......12
       Item 6. Selected Financial Data........................................15
       Item 7. Management's Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition
               And Results Of Operations......................................16
       Item 8. Financial Statements...........................................25
       Item 9. Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On
               Accounting And Financial Reporting.............................25
PART III......................................................................26
       Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters And Control
                Persons; Compliance With Section 16(a) Of The Exchange Act....26
       Item 11. Executive Compensation........................................28
       Item 12. Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners
                And Management................................................29
       Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transaction.................30
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002..................................1
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 302..................................1
ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2002.......................................i


                                       ii

<PAGE>

                                     PART I

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

         In  April  1999,  we  merged  with  and  into  Advanced  Communications
(Nevada),  a Nevada  corporation.  Pursuant to this merger,  the shareholders of
Advanced  Communications  (Nevada)  received  90% of the  Company's  outstanding
common stock and the Company received all of Advanced Communications  (Nevada)'s
assets.  These  assets  included all of the North and South  American  rights to
market and distribute  SpectruCell,  a wireless  software  defined radio ("SDR")
based   communications   platform  that  is  being  developed  to  offer  mobile
communications  network providers the flexibility of processing and transmitting
multiple wireless communication signals (e.g., AMPS, CDMA, GSM, Mobile IP, Voice
IP, etc.)  through one base station and is expected to provide  flexibility  for
future  spectrum  upgrades to 3G. The SpectruCell  product was previously  being
developed  by  Advanced  Communications  Technologies  (Australia),   Pty.  Ltd.
("Advanced  Communications  (Australia)")  an Australia  development  company in
which  we owned a 20%  interest  that  went  into an  administrative  insolvency
proceeding  in  mid-2002  and  is  no  longer  operating  as  a  going  concern.
SpectruCell  is now being  developed  by  SpectruCell  SDR Pty Ltd, an Australia
start-up  company  in which we have no  interest,  which  acquired  a license to
development,  manufacture and sell the SpectruCell technology in the latter part
of 2002. We believe that our rights to SpectruCell have not been affected by the
transfer  of the  SpectruCell  technology  to  SpectruCell  SDR Pty Ltd and that
SpectruCell  SDR Pty Ltd  acquired  the  SpectruCell  technology  subject to our
rights.

         In July 2000,  we  entered  into an interim  License  and  Distribution
Agreement  (the  "interim  License  Agreement")  with  Advanced   Communications
(Australia) to help facilitate  implementation  of the rights we acquired in the
1999 merger. Advanced Communications (Nevada) acquired the rights it transferred
to us in the 1999  merger  from  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  and both
companies  were under the control of Roger May.  The interim  License  Agreement
acknowledged  our exclusive  license to market and distribute in North and South
America  the  SpectruCell  technology  and  certain  other  technologies  to  be
developed.  It was the  intention  of the  parties  that  upon  the  SpectruCell
technology   becoming   commercially   available,   our  company  and   Advanced
Communications  (Australia)  would  negotiate  royalty  payments,  reflective of
industry  standards  on an  arms-length  basis  after the final  pricing  of the
SpectruCell technology was established.

         During most of 2002, we were in litigation with Advanced Communications
(Australia)  and  Roger  May over our  stock  ownership  interests  in  Advanced
Communications (Australia) under a Stock Purchase Agreement we entered into with
Advanced  Communications  (Australia) in April 2000 and our rights to market and
distribute  SpectruCell  under an interim  License  Agreement.  In early October
2002,  Advanced  Communications   (Australia)  terminated  the  interim  License
Agreement on the grounds that we were insolvent and our  insolvency  constituted
an irreparable breach of the interim License Agreement.  Our initial response to
the  termination  of the  License  Agreement  was to oppose it;  however,  after
further  consideration  and receiving  advice of counsel,  we made the strategic
decision  not to contest the  termination  and to withdraw  from the  Australian
litigation.  This  decision was based,  in part,  on our view that the rights we
acquired in the 1999 merger with Advanced  Communications (Nevada) to market and
distribute  SpectruCell  in North and South America were not created or affected
by the termination of the interim License  Agreement by Advanced  Communications
(Australia). We intend to protect these rights to the fullest extent we are able
to do so, and we anticipate that Advanced  Communications  (Australia),  Mr. May
and SpectruCell  SDR Pty Ltd. will not acknowledge  these rights and will oppose
them. Mr. May and related entities control SpectruCell SDR Pty Ltd.

         As a result of the  above-described  events,  our ability to market and
distribute  SpectruCell  in North and South  America and  exercise the rights we
acquired in the 1999 merger with Advanced Communications (Nevada) is limited and
our rights to market and distribute  SpectruCell  are unclear.  Apart from this,
SpectruCell  is  still  under  development  and  it is  uncertain,  even  if the
above-described  issues  were  resolved,  whether the  development  will ever be
completed and a commercially viable product brought to market.


FINANCIAL CONDITION

         We had net losses of $4,332,693 and $19,732,566  during the years ended
June 30,  2002 and  2001,  respectively.  As of June  30,  2002,  we had cash of
$11,093 and current liabilities of $3,263,736. We do not have sufficient cash or
other  assets  to  meet  our  current  liabilities.   In  order  to  meet  those
obligations,  we will  need to raise  cash from the sale of  securities  or from
borrowings.  Our  independent  auditors have added an  explanatory  paragraph to
their audit opinions issued in connection with the years 2002 and 2001 financial
statements, which states that our ability to continue as a going concern depends
upon our  ability  to  resolve  liquidity  problems,  principally  by  obtaining
capital,   commencing  sales  and  generating   sufficient  revenues  to  become

                                       1
<PAGE>

profitable.  Our ability to obtain additional funding will determine our ability
to continue as a going  concern.  Our  financial  statements  do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

         If we are unable to obtain  additional  funding through our Equity Line
of Credit  facility (as described in the  Management  Discussion and Analysis of
Financial  Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Annual
Report)  until such time as the  SpectruCell  product is ready to be sold within
our  exclusive  markets,  then the  failure to obtain this  funding  will have a
material  adverse  effect on our business and our ability to continue as a going
concern.  As a  consequence,  we may be  forced  to seek  protection  under  the
bankruptcy  laws.  In that event,  it is unclear  whether we could  successfully
reorganize  our capital  structure and  operations,  or whether we could realize
sufficient  value for our assets to satisfy our creditors in full.  Accordingly,
should we be forced to file for  bankruptcy  protection,  there is no  assurance
that our  stockholders  would  receive any value.  A detailed  discussion of our
financial condition is contained in the Management's  Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this filing.

COMPANY HISTORY

         We were  incorporated  on April 30, 1998 and were  inactive  from April
1998 to June 1998 except for the issuance of founders' shares. On April 7, 1999,
Advanced Communications  (Nevada) merged with and into the Company.  Pursuant to
this merger, the shareholders of Advanced  Communications (Nevada) (of which Mr.
May was the principal  shareholder)  received 90% of the  Company's  outstanding
common stock and the Company received all of Advanced Communications  (Nevada)'s
assets that  included all of the North and South  American  rights to market and
distribute SpectruCell.

         Mr.  May and  his  related  entities  including  Global  Communications
Technology  Pty Ltd,  his wholly  owned  entity,  as majority  owner of Advanced
Communications (Nevada), received approximately 42,000,000 shares in the Company
under the share exchange.

         Media Forum,  the surviving  entity,  subsequently  changed its name to
Advanced  Communications  Technologies,  Inc. Upon completion of the merger,  we
changed our trading symbol to "ADVC."

         On January 31, 2000, we acquired Smart Investments.com,  Inc. through a
stock  exchange  with Smart  Investments'  sole  shareholder.  Immediately  upon
completion of that acquisition, we elected successor issuer status in accordance
with Rule  12g-3  promulgated  under the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
amended,  and consequently  became a "reporting  company" in compliance with the
NASD's requirements.

         On July 20,  1999,  we  formed  Advanced  Global  Communications,  Inc.
("AGC"), a Florida  corporation.  AGC was established to develop and operate our
international  telecommunications network from the United States to Pakistan and
India, as well as to acquire other switching and  telecommunications  companies.
The network was established in 2000 and operated until 2001, when the regulatory
climate in Pakistan and India made it legally and  economically  impractical  to
operate.  During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, we ceased  operating AGC's
international  telecommunications network and wrote-off our entire investment in
various telephone equipment and network costs.

         On  November  10,  1999,   AGC  entered  into  an  agreement  with  the
shareholders of World IP Incorporated and its wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries,
Sur  Comunicaciones,   S.A.,  a  Chilean  corporation,   and  Acinel,  S.A.,  an
Argentinean corporation,  to acquire a 51% controlling interest in the World IP.
Under the terms of the agreement, 500,000 shares of our restricted common stock,
plus $95,000 in cash was exchanged for 1,020 shares of stock representing 51% of
the then  issued  and  outstanding  shares  of  World.  The  500,000  shares  of
restricted common stock were valued at the trading price on the closing date and
together with the cash  consideration  resulted in a purchase price of $470,000.
World IP provides  wholesale  international  telephone services from the U.S. to
Chile and Argentina.  On October 4, 2000, we notified World's management and its
shareholders  that we intended to rescind the agreement  because we were unable,
after repeated requests, to obtain from World's management financial records and
audited financial statements. Consequently, our management deemed that it was in
our best interest to unilaterally rescind the agreement.  On October 6, 2000, we
filed suit in the Circuit  Court in and for Palm Beach County,  Florida  against
the  World IP and its  shareholders  for  rescission  of the  agreement  and for
monetary  damages  resulting from such breach.  On January 23, 2002, the parties
entered  into  Settlement  and  Rescission  Agreements  and  a  Stipulation  for
Dismissal  with  Prejudice  (the  "Stipulation")  to  settle  this  matter.  The
Stipulation  states  that the  November  10,  1999,  Agreement  and all  related
transactions,  including the issuance of 1,020 shares of World IP to AGC and the
500,000  shares  of  restricted  common  stock  to World  IP  shareholders,  are
rescinded,  AB INITIO,  effective November 10, 1999, as though such transactions
never  occurred.  Further,  as part of the settlement,  Advanced  Communications
issued  a total  of  320,000  shares  of  restricted  common  stock  to  certain
shareholders  of World IP,  which  shares have been  included  in the  Company's
Registration  Statement  on file with the SEC and have not yet been  registered.
The  Circuit  Court in and for  Palm  Beach  County  issued  an Order  Approving

                                       2
<PAGE>

Stipulation   approving  the  Settlement  and  Rescission   Agreements  and  the
Stipulation. The lawsuit was dismissed by a court order dated January 29, 2002.

         For  financial  statement  purposes,  we  have  treated  the  World  IP
rescission  transaction  as if we had  never  acquired  the  World IP stock  and
wrote-off  our $125,000  investment  in World IP in our June 30, 2000  financial
statements.

         On April 5,  2000,  we entered  into a Stock  Purchase  Agreement  with
Advanced  Communications  (Australia) to acquire a 20% interest for $19,350,000.
The majority owner of Advanced Communications  (Australia) is Roger May, who was
the Chief Executive  Officer,  Chairman of the Board of Directors of our company
until  November 30, 2001.  In  consideration  for our purchase of the stock,  we
issued  5,000,000 shares of our common stock having a value of $11,850,000 and a
$7,500,000 unsecured non-interest bearing note payable in installments. The note
payable was payable in three equal monthly installments commencing May 31, 2000.
Under  the  terms of the  April  2000  Stock  Purchase  Agreement,  the  monthly
installment deadline was extended indefinitely, without interest, to allow us to
raise the cash portion of the  purchase  price  through the sale of  securities.
Upon  raising  such  funds,   our  company  was  obligated  to  repay   Advanced
Communications  (Australia)'s  note payable after  deducting for reserves needed
for current operations, working capital and the development and expansion of its
operations and the operations of its subsidiaries, as determined by its Board of
Directors.  Our company  believes  that it has no further  obligation to pay the
unsecured  note since the Stock  Purchase  Agreement was  terminated in November
2002 by  Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  The shares  issued to  Advanced
Communications  (Australia)  were valued at the  average  quoted  trading  price
during  the  acquisition  period.  The  fair  value  of  the  investment  at the
acquisition  date was  determined to be  $3,657,472.  The excess of the purchase
price over the fair value of the  investment  in the amount of  $15,692,528  was
accounted for as goodwill.

         During the year ended June 30, 2001,  we reduced the carrying  value of
our investment in Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  to $2,000,000  based on
management evaluation of Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  This adjustment
was  necessitated by FASB 121 ("Accounting for Impairment of Long Lived Assets")
and APB 18 ("The Equity Method of Accounting for  Investments in Common Stock").
Such  pronouncements  require the annual  evaluation  of  long-lived  assets for
impairment.

         Due to Advanced  Communications  (Australia)'s  filing on or about July
18, 2002 for  protection  under  Australia's  insolvency  laws by  appointing an
Independent  Administrator  to take over its business and affairs its ceasing to
operate  as a  going  concern  and the  sale of its  assets  to  third  parties,
management  determined  that its  remaining  goodwill  investment  was  impaired
pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 142. Accordingly, the Company has written off
the balance of its  unamortized  goodwill of  $1,700,000  during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002.

         On November  11, 2002,  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  issued a
Notice of  Termination  to the  Company  which  stated that the April 2000 Stock
Purchase Agreement was terminated  immediately due to the Company's  insolvency.
The  effect  of the  Notice of  Termination  is to cancel  the  Company's  stock
interest in Advanced Communications (Australia). Consistent with our decision to
withdraw from the Australia  litigation,  we have not challenged the termination
of the Stock  Purchase  Agreement in the  Australia  Court.  Given that Advanced
Communications  (Australia)  is in an insolvency  proceeding  in Australia,  has
ceased to do business as an  operating  entity,  that its assets have been sold,
and  that  the  Company  has  written  off its  entire  investment  in  Advanced
Communications  (Australia),  the future financial impact of this on the Company
is not believed to be significant.  The Company's position,  which is subject to
opinion by Australian  counsel,  is that as a result of Advanced  Communications
(Australia's)  insolvency  proceeding and its  termination of the Stock Purchase
Agreement,  no  further  money is owed,  and that  the  Company  has no  further
obligation to Advanced Communications (Australia).

         In July 2000,  we  entered  into an interim  License  and  Distribution
Agreement  (the  "interim  License  Agreement")  with  Advanced   Communications
(Australia) to help facilitate  implementation  of the rights we acquired in the
1999 merger. The interim License Agreement acknowledged our exclusive license to
market and distribute in North and South America the SpectruCell  technology and
certain other  technologies to be developed.  In early October,  2002,  Advanced
Communications  (Australia)  terminated  the interim  License  Agreement  on the
grounds that we were  insolvent and our  insolvency  constituted  an irreparable
breach of the interim License Agreement. After considering the overall situation
and receiving advice of counsel,  we made the strategic  decision not to contest
the termination and to withdraw from the Australian litigation.

         On  July  24,  2000,  we  formed   Australon   USA,  Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation,  owned 50% by our company and 50% by  Australon  Enterprises  Pty.,
Ltd. a publicly traded company listed on the Australian Stock Exchange and a 66%
owned subsidiary of Advanced Communications  (Australia).  Australon Enterprises
Pty Ltd. is an  Australian  public  company that  manufactures  and  distributes
remote monitoring  devices for homes and businesses such as remote meter reading
and residential  automated  gateway  devices.  While Mr. May, our former CEO and
Chairman  of  the  Board  has a  significant  ownership  interest  in  Australon
Enterprise  Pty,  through his  ownership  interest  in  Advanced  Communications
(Australia),  he is not involved in  Australon`s  daily  management  or business

                                       3
<PAGE>

operations and is not  represented on its Board of Directors.  The joint venture
relationship was established while Mr. May controlled both companies.  We formed
Australon  USA, Inc. to market and sell the  Australon  suite of products in the
U.S.,  Canada and South America.  Presently,  the company is not in negotiations
with  Australon  Enterprises  Pty and will not enter into any  discussions  with
Australon's management until the Company's lawsuit with Advanced  Communications
(Australia)  and Mr. May is  resolved.  Australon  USA, Inc is inactive and will
remain inactive for the foreseeable future.  Australon USA, Inc. had no revenues
or expenses for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 or 2001.

         In November 2000, we formed Advanced Network  Technologies (USA), Inc.,
a Delaware corporation, owned 70% by us and 30% by Advanced Network Technologies
Pty. Ltd.  Advanced Network intended to acquire wireless network  infrastructure
in North and South America.  This  infrastructure  was intended to help showcase
SpectruCell within a working network environment.  To date, no acquisitions have
been made.  Advanced Network  Technologies (USA), Inc. is presently inactive and
had no revenues or expenses for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001 or 2001.

ACQUISITIONS

         On September  7, 2001 we entered into a Letter of Intent with  Advanced
Communications  Technologies  (Australia)  to  acquire  all of the  intellectual
property,  including the worldwide rights (other than rights to territories that
we currently  possess) for the licensing  and  distribution  of the  SpectruCell
product  (the "IP  Rights").  The Letter of Intent which was executed by Messrs.
Roberts  and  May on  behalf  of  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  and us,
respectively,  includes various  conditions  precedent to the transfer of the IP
Rights including, but not limited to, the raising by us of $80 million in the US
capital markets, appropriate regulatory approvals, approval by both our Board of
Directors and shareholders, appropriate due diligence and definitive agreements.
During the period from  January 2002 to present,  we, along with our  Australian
financial and legal  advisors,  have attempted to negotiate with Mr. May in good
faith to enter into a  Non-Disclosure  Agreement to allow us to commence our due
diligence  on  the  financial,  legal  and  technological  affairs  of  Advanced
Communications  (Australia).  In addition,  during this period we have filed two
lawsuits against Mr. May and Advanced  Communications  (Australia) for breach of
our  April 5,  2000  Stock  Purchase  Agreement  and July 5,  2000  License  and
Distribution  Agreement.  Consequently,  we have  been  unable  to  execute  any
Non-Disclosure Agreement nor commence any active or meaningful negotiations with
Mr. May for the acquisition of the SpectruCell  technology pursuant to the terms
of the September 7, 2001 Letter of Intent.  On September 7, 2002,  the September
7,  2001  Letter  of  Intent  that  the  Company   entered  into  with  Advanced
Communications   (Australia)  to  acquire  all  of  the  intellectual  property,
including the worldwide  rights (other than the rights to  territories  that the
Company currently possess) for the licensing and distribution of the SpectruCell
product, expired.

         Due  to  the  litigation  with  Mr.  May  and  Advanced  Communications
(Australia),  the restrictions on foreign ownership and Advanced  Communications
(Australia) voluntary administration described above, the Company will no longer
pursue the  acquisition of Advanced  Communications  (Australia)'s  intellectual
property.

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

         U.S. mobile  subscribers are projected to grow to 226.8 million by 2010
and generate revenues of $72.8 billion,  according to Analysts  Bakerville (Feb.
2002). New technologies,  such as broadband wireless, are helping to fuel demand
for more advanced wireless equipment.  High-speed fiber optic networks are being
coupled  with  broadband  wireless  technologies  to  deliver  enhanced  telecom
capabilities and features to new customers and markets. Global revenues from the
broadband  market are  expected to exceed $88 billion by 2007,  according to the
ARC  Group   (Feb.   2002).   However,   during   the  past  six   months,   the
telecommunications  industry has  experienced the adverse effect of the downturn
in the  global  economy,  and  as a  result,  has  significantly  curtailed  its
infrastructure capital spending. Moreover, as a result of the economic and stock
market  slowdown in the United  States,  wireless  carriers  have  deferred  the
roll-out of new and enhanced  wireless  telecom  features  and the  expansion of
their existing wireless networks.

         CHANGES IN THE WIRELESS TELECOM INDUSTRY

         As carriers deploy their networks,  they face significant  competition.
Through  privatization  in  the  1980s  and  deregulation  in  the  1990s,  both
domestically  and  internationally,  the  competitive  landscape has changed for
wireless  carriers.   For  carriers  to  differentiate   themselves  and  remain
competitive in this new environment, they are deploying networks to:

         o     provide seamless  nationwide coverage and avoid expensive roaming
               costs on  competitors'  networks in markets where carriers do not
               currently own infrastructure;

                                       4
<PAGE>

         o     offer enhanced  services,  such as one rate plans,  calling party
               pays,  caller  ID,  text  messaging  and  emergency  911  locator
               services;

         o     implement  the new  third-generation  (3G)  network  standard  to
               deliver  wireless  broadband  data services,  including  Internet
               access and two-way e-mail;

         o     introduce   other   emerging   data   networking   and  broadband
               technologies,  such as LMDS,  MMDS and other  point-to-multipoint
               architectures,  for the  provision  of high speed  data  wireless
               Internet access and other broadband services; and

         o     offer  wireless  local  loop  systems   domestically   to  bypass
               incumbent  wire  line  competitors  and in  developing  countries
               lacking modern wire line telephone infrastructure.

         The convergence of traditional  wireless,  wire line and cable services
is also adding complexity to the telecom environment as carriers deploy networks
spanning  traditional  wireless/wire  line  boundaries  to offer these  enhanced
services and new technologies.

         NEW CHALLENGES FOR WIRELESS CARRIERS AND EQUIPMENT VENDORS

         Due to this  increasingly  competitive  environment,  carriers  need to
focus  on  satisfying  customer  demand  for  enhanced  services,  seamless  and
comprehensive  coverage,  better quality,  more bandwidth and lower prices.  The
proliferation of carriers and new technologies has created an environment  where
speed to  market  is an  essential  element  of a  wireless  carrier's  success.
Carriers are also experiencing challenges managing increasingly complex networks
and   technologies.   For  example,   the  introduction  of  wireless   Internet
technologies  and the  growth  in  broadband  wireless  services  requiring  the
transmission  of large  amounts of data  creates  additional  new  technological
hurdles for carriers  establishing or upgrading their networks.  In this dynamic
environment,   customer   acquisition  and  retention  are  the  most  important
determinants of success. This has led carriers to increasingly  prioritize their
resources,  focusing on mission critical revenue  generating  activities such as
marketing,  billing and customer  care and  outsourcing  whenever they can do so
effectively.

         The  changing  environment  is  also  placing  significant  operational
challenges  on  carriers.  Carriers  must make  critical  decisions  about which
geographic  markets to serve and which services and technologies to offer.  They
are  striving  to avoid  the cost  uncertainties  and  considerable  operational
challenges associated with the staffing and process implementation  software for
the  deployment  and  management  of their  networks.  Furthermore,  the rapidly
changing and  increasingly  complex nature of wireless  technologies has made it
difficult for carriers to optimize  employee  training and  utilization for what
are often one-time upgrades for each generation of new technology. Additionally,
networks are being  implemented  with equipment from unrelated  vendors,  posing
system integration challenges. This situation is exacerbated by consolidation in
the industry, which often entails the integration of disparate networks.

         Equipment  vendors  are  facing  numerous  challenges  in  the  current
environment,  as  carriers  are  requiring  them to develop new  generations  of
equipment that are capable of handling increased features and functionality.  In
addition, vendors must provide equipment that can be deployed within a carrier's
existing network and integrate with equipment offered by other vendors. Carriers
are more  likely to select a vendor who  provides a full suite of  products  and
deployment  services.  Given the rapid pace of technological  change,  equipment
vendors are finding it increasingly difficult to justify using resources for the
deployment,   integration  and  optimization  of  their  current  generation  of
products.  This has  increasingly  led equipment  vendors to focus on their core
competencies   to  offer   competitive   solutions  in  this  rapidly   changing
technological  environment  and to  outsource  network  design,  deployment  and
management  services.  On  top  of  the  technological  challenges,  facing  the
telecommunications  industry,  the  recent  downturn  in  the  U.S.  and  global
economies as well as the bankruptcy filings of Worldcom and Quest Communications
have caused a dramatic  decrease in not only the capital  budgets of the telecom
giants but in the industry's overall financial stability.

         THE SPECTRUCELL TECHNOLOGY

         NOTE: The discussion in this section is based  primarily on information
provided to us by management  of Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  prior to
2002 and prior to the  commencement  of the  litigation  between us and Advanced
Communications (Australia),  the current accuracy of which we have not been able
to independently verify.. It is also on information provided to us by management
of  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  after  that  time  during  settlement
negotiations and from affidavits  filed by employees of Advanced  Communications
(Australia) in the litigation  referred to above,  the current accuracy of which
we have not been able to verify. As a result of that litigation,  the insolvency

                                       5
<PAGE>

of  Advanced  Communications  (Australia),  its  ceasing  to  operate as a going
concern,  and the transfer of the  SpectruCell  technology to a third party with
which we have no  relationship,  we do not have any reliable  information on the
current status of the technology

         SpectruCell  is  a  wireless   software  defined  radio  ("SDR")  based
communications  platform that is being developed to offer mobile  communications
network  providers the  flexibility  of  processing  and  transmitting  multiple
wireless  communication  signals (e.g.,  AMPS,  CDMA,  GSM, Mobile IP, Voice IP,
etc.) through one base station and is expected to provide flexibility for future
spectrum upgrades to 3G.

         The SpectruCell  conceptual  design  incorporates new approaches to the
development of a software defined radio operating system SpectruCell is expected
to use  commercial  off  the  shelf  components  to the  extent  that  they  are
available. By utilizing the SpectruCell software-based operating system, network
providers  are  expected  to be able to support  substantially  all  current and
future wireless  frequencies with the same equipment on the same network through
software upgrades.




         SpectruCell  is being  developed  and  designed  to provide a method of
transmitting the entire base bank spectrum from the receiving  Antenna/Cell to a
centralized  Mobile  Telephone  Switching  Office (MTSO) for call processing and
redistribution,   rather  than  processing   calls  at  the  cell  site.   Until
approximately three years ago almost all cellular  transmissions were Analog. In
the current cellular network  environment,  additional call processing  hardware
has to be added to each  cell  site  (usually  around  200+  cells  per  average
network),  for network  operators  to transmit  evolving  new digital  protocols
(CDMA,  TDMA,  GSM,  W-CDMA,   etc.)  over  their  existing  cellular  networks.
SpectruCell  is  being  developed  and  designed  as  a  publishable  API  (open
architecture) so that network  operators can write their own interfaces,  and it
is also software  upgradeable  so that  additional  protocols can be added to an
existing base station by uploading another software module to the base station.

         SpectruCell  is being  developed  to have the  capacity to  dynamically
assign  channels  and  spectrum  (i.e.,  call  carrying  capacity)  to the cells
requiring it most. In a sense,  the cellular  operator would possess a so-called
"elastic  capacity" at cells in the system.  Since all voice  channels  would be
centrally located at the switch instead of at the cell/antenna sites, individual
voice channels and RF trunks can be  distributed as needed to busy  cell/antenna
sites. Channels would be essentially  "borrowed" from surrounding cells and used
to support call traffic at the busier sites during call volume peaks.  This is a
distinct  departure from present  "honeycomb  style" systems where each cellular
network is dedicated to a single  protocol and each cell has fixed call carrying
capacity or bandwidth, that is limited by the number of voice channels installed
at each cell site. In essence, the SpectruCell architecture provides a basis for
a  paradigm  shift  from  the  conventional  telecommunications  central  office
switching  structure  for evolving  wireless  networks.  For carriers to support
multiple protocols such as GSM and CDMA digital mobile phones,  current wireless
communications  technology  requires separate cell sites with separate equipment
for each  protocol  carried.  If developed as intended,  SpectruCell  will allow
carriers to maintain and utilize their existing  networks to support current and
evolving through software upgrades

         Other  applications that have been identified for potential  deployment
include:

         o     A  hardware   platform  for  3G  cellular  test  equipment  where
               SpectruCell's  SDR based flexibility can be employed to allow for
               testing of varying 3G standards;

         o     A  hardware   platform  for  high  end   military   based  signal
               processing.  SDR  originated  in the military  and  SpectruCell's
               ability to handle multiple  communications  standards is expected
               to make  it  desirable  for  test  and  development  of  advanced
               military communications' system, such as:

               |X|      Radar;

               |X|      Sonar; and

               |X|      Military communications.

         o     Aerial  communications  and  mobile   communications   platforms.
               SpectruCell  is  being  designed  such  that  it can be  deployed
               aerially or in mobile  situations  in order to provide  rapid and
               flexible coverage for a particular area.

         At  this  time,  to our  knowledge,  SpectruCell  is  not  commercially
available and is still in development. At of this time, we have not been able to
independently  verify  what  features,   applications,   capacities  or  claimed
advantages of SpectruCell have been  demonstrated.  At this time, we do not have


                                       6
<PAGE>


any reliable  information as to when SpectruCell will be at a stage where it can
be marketed.

PATENTS

         We have been told that Advanced  Communications  (Australia) filed five
patent   applications  with  the  Australian  Patent  Office  under  the  Patent
Cooperation  Treaty  in  connection  with  certain  aspects  of the  SpectruCell
technology.  Under this treaty,  any patents issued provide patent protection in
111 member countries, including the United States. As far as we know, no patents
have been issued to date and we do not know that any such patents will be issued
in the future.

COMPETITION

         We believe that the  SpectruCell  system will compete with  traditional
cellular telephone and other wireless communications technologies.  However, the
technology will have to be differentiated through cost savings in implementation
and  upgrades  and through  improved  service.  Like most new  technologies  the
introduction of SpectruCell will require  demonstrations  and education  through
field  trials  and  similar  demonstrations  to  introduce  the  product  to the
potential  market.  No  assurances  can be given that the market will accept the
SpectruCell  technology,  or that other competing  products will be developed or
achieve better market acceptance than the SpectruCell technology.

         The  wireless   telecommunications   infrastructure  market  is  highly
competitive.  The market for a  SpectruCell  type  product is  characterized  by
rapidly changing  technology,  evolving industry wireless standards and frequent
new  product  introductions  and  enhancements.  Failure to keep pace with these
changes could seriously harm our ability to compete once it becomes commercially
available.  Even if the legal and other issues  referred to above were  resolved
and we were able to market and distribute  SpectruCell  as originally  intended,
our ability to compete  successfully  in the market would depend on many factors
including  the timing of  delivery  to market of the  SpectruCell  product,  its
flexibility, price, and reliability.

         Potential   competitors   consist   primarily  of  major  domestic  and
international companies, all of which have longer operating histories; installed
customer bases;  higher volumes;  substantially  greater name  recognition;  and
greater financial, technical,  manufacturing,  marketing, sales and distribution
resources.  While the Company  anticipates  marketing and selling SpectruCell to
wireless  network  operators,  other  telecommunications  companies and federal,
state and local governmental  agencies, we expect to face increasing competition
as major  telecommunications  companies  realize the advantages of SDR and begin
devoting  more  resources  to  developing  SDR base  technologies.  All of these
companies have substantially  greater resources than we do. These companies also
have more  experience  than we do in obtaining  governmental  approval  from the
Federal Communications Commission and other agencies.

         We  cannot be sure that we would be able to  effectively  compete  with
existing  wireless network companies or that we would be able to gain acceptance
for the SpectruCell system.

SALES AND DISTRIBUTION

         We planned to have  independent  distribution and sales offices located
in  California,  New York  and  Florida  once  SpectruCell  became  commercially
available.   Given  the  litigation  between  us  and  Advanced   Communications
(Australia) and the current state of the SpectruCell development,  it is unclear
when or whether we will carry out such plans.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

         The  proposed  sale of  wireless  communications  services  through the
SpectruCell  product  may be  subject  to  government  regulation.  Federal  law
regulates  interstate and  international  telecommunications,  while states have
jurisdiction  over  telecommunications  that originate and terminate  within the
same state. These regulations may require Advanced  Communications  (Australia),
its  successor,  or our company to obtain  regulatory  approval from the Federal
Communications  Commission prior to the use of the SpectruCell  product. At this
time, we cannot  estimate how long this process will take to complete or whether
these  efforts  will be  successful  or how  and  when  Advanced  Communications
(Australia) will satisfy the FCC, if at all.  Moreover,  because  SpectruCell is
not yet  developed  for the  commercial  market,  it is uncertain  what form the
product will ultimately take and whether  Advanced  Communications  (Australia),
the company or the commercial  user will be required to comply with the specific
FCC  regulations  in effect at the time  SpectruCell  is  available  for sale to
commercial customers.  The inability to obtain FCC approval, if required,  would
prevent us from deploying any wireless applications,  which would be detrimental
to our proposed business operations. Changes in existing policies or regulations
in any state or by the Federal  Communications  Commission  ("FCC") could have a
material  adverse  effect on our financial  condition or results of  operations.


                                       7
<PAGE>


There can be no assurance that the regulatory  authorities in one or more states
or the FCC will not take  action  having an adverse  effect on our  business  or
financial condition or results of operations.

EMPLOYEES AND CONSULTANTS

         As of November 15, 2002,  we have no full time  employees and four part
time  consultants.  None  of our  consultants  are  covered  by  any  collective
bargaining agreement.

ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

         As of August 1, 2002,  the Company  relocated its  principal  executive
office from  California to 420 Lexington  Avenue,  New York, NY 10170 within the
office facility of Danson Partners,  LLC, a privately owned company that employs
our  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer.  No rent or  facility  use fee is
charged to the  Company by Danson  Partners,  LLC.  The  Company is a party to a
three-year  office lease that  commenced  January 1, 2002 and ends  December 31,
2004 for its former California  office located at 880 Apollo Street,  Suite 200,
El Segundo,  CA. The  monthly  rent is $7,634  inclusive  of the cost of monthly
parking.  The  minimum  lease  payment  for the  remaining  life of the lease is
$229,020.  The Company has engaged Grubb & Ellis to find a suitable subtenant to
assume all or a portion of the Company's remaining lease obligation.

         The  Company is a guarantor  to Jason  Webster's  one year  residential
lease that expires  January 25, 2003. The Guaranty which was executed in January
2002 requires the Company to reimburse the landlord in the event of a default by
Jason Webster,  the former Director of Corporate  Communications of the Company.
The rent under the  residential  lease is $1,690 per month.  The Company has not
been required to perform under the Guaranty.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

         (i)      NANCY J. NEEDHAM AND EDMUND R. DUPONT LAWSUIT

         In Nancy J. Needham;  Edmund R. DuPont et al v. Advanced Communications
Technologies,  Inc., et al, an action filed July 2000 in the Fifteenth  Judicial
Circuit  in the State of  Florida,  two former  officers  and  directors  of the
Company are seeking  damages and injunctive  relief arising out of the Company's
refusal to provide legal opinion letters and to take other actions  necessary to
allow the former officers to convert  restricted stock into  unrestricted  stock
under an exemption  under Rule 144. The plaintiffs have not specified the amount
of damages they are seeking. The Company has filed a counterclaim to rescind all
of the  Plaintiffs'  stock for lack and/or  failure of  consideration  and other
damages.  In October 2001, the court denied summary judgment for the Plaintiffs.
On November 14, 2002, the Company settled the litigation with the Needham/DuPont
plaintiffs by agreeing to release the  plaintiffs'  stock from  restriction  and
issuing a three year  promissory  note for $173,494 to reimburse the  plaintiffs
for its  legal  costs.  The  plaintiffs  agreed to  release  the  Company,  it's
officers,  and directors,  except Mr. May and Mr. Halperin, the Company's former
SEC  counsel  from any claims for  damages.  On  November  18,  2002 a Notice of
Voluntary Dismissal was filed with the court.

         On or about July 2000,  the  Company  entered  into an  indemnification
agreement  with Jack Halperin,  Esq., our then SEC counsel,  whereby the Company
agreed to indemnify Mr. Halperin for all costs and damages  incurred as a result
of Mr.  Halperin  being named a defendant in the  Needham/DuPont  lawsuit  filed
against the  Company,  Mr. May and Mr.  Halperin in July 2000.  Mr. May executed
this agreement on behalf of the Company. The agreement includes a provision that
prohibits  the  Company  from  entering  into any  settlement  agreement  in the
Needham/DuPont  lawsuit  unless  such  settlement  agreement  provides  for  the
unconditional  release of Mr. Halperin from any claim. On November 14, 2002, the
Company settled the Needham/DuPont  lawsuit without obtaining a full release for
Mr.  Halperin.  The Company's  Board of Directors is consulting with its current
legal counsel to determine the validity of the indemnification agreement.

         (ii)     WORLD IP INCORPORATED SETTLEMENT

         In  Advanced  Communications  Technologies,  Inc.,  et al v.  World  IP
Incorporated,  et al, an action filed in the Fifteenth  Judicial  Circuit in the
State of Florida,  the Company sued World IP Incorporated,  its subsidiaries and
shareholders  (collectively,  "World")  for  breach  of  the  terms  of a  Stock
Subscription and Purchase Agreement between the parties dated November 10, 1999.
The parties entered into Settlement and Rescission Agreements, pursuant to which
all  transactions  between  the parties  including  the Stock  Subscription  and
Purchase Agreement,  the issuance of World stock to the Company and the issuance
of 500,000 shares of the Company's stock to World's  shareholders were rescinded
effective November 10, 1999. Further,  World's  shareholders were issued 320,000
shares  of  the  Company's  stock  which  will  be  registered  pursuant  to the
Registration   Statement   currently  on  file  with  the  Securities   Exchange
Commission. The lawsuit was dismissed by a court order dated January 29, 2002.


                                       8
<PAGE>


         (iii)    AJW PARTNERS, LLC AND NEW MILLENNIUM CAPITAL PARTNERS II, LLC

         On April 24, 2002, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with
the two remaining  September 1999 Convertible  Debenture holders,  AJW Partners,
LLC and New  Millennium  Capital  Partners  II,  LLC.  Under  the  terms  of the
Settlement Agreement,  the Company is obligated to issue, over a 180 day period,
8,500,000  shares of its  common  stock in  exchange  for the  dismissal  of the
lawsuit and in satisfaction of the remaining  outstanding  principal and accrued
interest. The Company had the option, until July 23, 2002, to substitute cash in
lieu of shares.  On closing,  the Company issued 1,460,725 and 664,275 shares of
its common stock to AJW Partners,  LLC and New Millennium  Capital  Partners II,
LLC, respectively.  A Stipulation and Order of Discontinuance was filed with and
Ordered by the court on April 25,  2002.  On June 4, 2002 the Company  issued an
additional  1,460,725 and 664,275 shares of common stock to AJW Partners LLC and
New Millennium Capital Partners, II, LLC.

         On both August 26, 2002 and  September  24,  2002,  the Company  issued
1,460,725  and  664,275  shares  of  common  stock to AJW  Partners  LLC and New
Millennium  Capital  Partners II, LLC,  respectively,  in full settlement of the
Company's  outstanding  obligation  on the  remaining  September  30,  1999  12%
Convertible Debenture.

         (iv)     ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS (AUSTRALIA) LITIGATION

         On December 6, 2001 and subsequently, the Company received notices from
Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  claiming  that the Company was in default
under the April 2000 Stock  Purchase  Agreement  pursuant  to which the  Company
acquired  a 20% stock  interest  in  Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  The
notices threatened to place a lien on or cancel the Company's shares. On January
23, 2002, the Company filed suit against Advanced Communications (Australia) and
Roger May in the Supreme Court of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and applied for
and obtained a temporary  retraining order prohibiting  Advanced  Communications
(Australia) from "transferring, dealing with, charging, diminishing, mortgaging,
assigning  or  disposing  of" the  Company's  stock in  Advanced  Communications
(Australia)  pending a further hearing on the matter. The temporary  restraining
order was extended on April 26, 2002 by the court  pending a further  hearing on
the matter.

         On  May  7,  2002,   the  Company   received  a  notice  from  Advanced
Communications   (Australia)   claiming   that  the  Company  had  breached  its
obligations under the interim License  Agreement.  In addition,  on May 7, 2002,
Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  sent a notice  formally  terminating  the
interim  License  Agreement.  The  Company  applied to the court for a temporary
restraining  order   prohibiting   Advanced   Communications   (Australia)  from
terminating its rights under the interim License Agreement.  On May 8, 2002, the
requested temporary  restraining order was issued by the court pending a further
hearing on the matter.

         On May 27,  2002 and May 28,  2002 the court held full  hearings on the
Company's  injunction  applications  and took the matter  under  submission.  On
August 23, 2002, the court issued a comprehensive  temporary injunction granting
all the relief  sought by the  Company  pending  trial on the  matters at issue.
Among  other  things,   the  injunction   prohibited   Advanced   Communications
(Australia),  directly  or  indirectly,  from  taking any action in the  license
territory with respect to marketing,  distributing, selling or otherwise dealing
with the SpectruCell  technology (including the military applications  thereof),
except through and with the prior written  consent of the Company.  In addition,
the ruling granted the Company a preliminary  injunction until trial prohibiting
Advanced Communications (Australia) from "transferring,  dealing with, charging,
diminishing,  mortgaging,  assigning or  disposing  of" the  Company's  stock in
Advanced Communications (Australia).

         In mid-October  2002, Mr. May and Advanced  Communications  (Australia)
terminated the interim License Agreement based on the assertion that the Company
was  insolvent  and that its  insolvency  constituted  an  irreparable  event of
default  thereunder.  The Company made a strategic decision not to challenge the
termination.  On October 25,  2002,  the Company  withdrew  from the  litigation
against Advanced Communications (Australia) and Mr. May. Despite the termination
of the interim  License  Agreement,  the Company  still owns the North and South
American rights to market and distribute  SpectruCell that it acquired  pursuant
to the April 1999 merger with Advanced Communications (Nevada).

         In mid-November 2002, Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  terminated
the  Stock  Purchase  Agreement  based on the  assertion  that the  Company  was
insolvent  and its  insolvency  constituted  an  irreparable  event  of  default
thereunder.  The effect of the Notice of  Termination is to cancel the Company's
stock  interest  in Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  Consistent  with our
decision to withdraw from the Australia  litigation  referred to above,  we have
not challenged the termination of the Stock Purchase  Agreement in the Australia
Court.  Given  that  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  is in an  insolvency
proceeding in Australia,  has ceased to do business as an operating entity, that
its assets  have been sold,  and that the  Company  has  written  off its entire
investment in Advanced Communications  (Australia),  the future financial impact
of this termination of the Company rights is believed not to be significant. The
Company's  position,  which is subject to opinion by Australian counsel, is that


                                       9
<PAGE>


as a result of Advanced  Communications  (Australia's)  termination of the Stock
Purchase  Agreement,  no further  money is owed,  and the Company has no further
obligation to Advanced Communications (Australia).

         v)       STAR MULTICARE SERVICES, INC.

         In  STAR  MULTI  CARE   SERVICES,   INC.  v.  ADVANCED   COMMUNICATIONS
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., an action filed September 18, 2000 in the Fifteenth Judicial
Circuit in the State of Florida,  Star Multi Care Services,  Inc.  ("Star") sued
the  Company for alleged  breach of contract  and the  recovery of a break-up or
termination fee in excess of $50,000 in conjunction  with the Company's  alleged
failure to consummate a proposed merger with Star in January 2000.

CONTINGENCIES

         INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND EMPLOYEES IN RE: ADVANCED
         COMMUNICATIONS (AUSTRALIA) v. COMPANY DIRECTORS AND EMPLOYEES

         On or about May 10, 2002,  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  filed
suit in the Superior court of Orange County, California against the Company, all
of its  directors,  its former  president,  and some of its  former and  present
employees,  including  the  Company's  receptionist.  On or about May 17,  2002,
Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  voluntarily  dismissed the suit as to the
Company but not as to the individual defendants.

         The  complaint  sets  forth  multiple  causes  of  action  against  the
defendants, including various business torts. The basis of the complaint is that
the  defendants  improperly  interfered  with and conspired to ruin  plaintiff's
business and conspired to force plaintiff into bankruptcy.

         In the opinion of the Company,  based on input from legal counsel,  the
complaint is deficient and subject to attack on numerous  procedural grounds. In
the  opinion  of  the  Company,   based  on  its  knowledge  of  the  facts  and
circumstances  underlying  the  action,  the  complaint  is  also  substantively
deficient and meritless.

         Under the Company's  articles of incorporation  and applicable  Florida
law,  the Company is obligated to  indemnify  and defend its  directors  and the
officer  named as  defendants  who have been served in the  action.  The Company
might also be under an  obligation  to indemnify and defend the other former and
present employees named as defendants who have not been served in the action, if
and when they are  served.  This  determination  will be made on a  case-by-case
basis.

         INDEMNIFICATION  AGREEMENT  BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND JACK  HALPERIN  RE:
         NEEDHAM/DUPONT LAWSUIT

         On or about July 2000,  the  Company  entered  into an  indemnification
agreement  with Jack Halperin,  Esq., our then SEC counsel,  whereby the Company
agreed to indemnify Mr. Halperin for all costs and damages  incurred as a result
of Mr.  Halperin  being named a defendant in the  Needham/DuPont  lawsuit  filed
against the  Company,  Mr. May and Mr.  Halperin in July 2000.  Mr. May executed
this agreement on behalf of the Company. The agreement includes a provision that
prohibits  the  Company  from  entering  into any  settlement  agreement  in the
Needham/DuPont  lawsuit  unless  such  settlement  agreement  provides  for  the
unconditional  release of Mr. Halperin from any claim. On November 14, 2002, the
Company settled the Needham/DuPont  lawsuit without obtaining a full release for
Mr.  Halperin.  The Company's  Board of Directors is consulting with its current
legal counsel to determine the validity of the indemnification agreement.

         PENDING  CLAIM BY  ADVANCED  COMMUNICATIONS  (AUSTRALIA)  FOR  COSTS OF
         AUSTRALIA LITIGATION AND FOR DAMAGES

         Following our withdrawal from the Australia  litigation against Mr. May
and Advanced Communications  (Australia),  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)
applied to the court for an order awarding its costs of the  litigation  against
the Company. Advanced Communications (Australia) has indicated that its costs of
litigation were approximately AU $400,000 or approximately US$220,000.  Advanced
Communications  (Australia)  has  also  applied  for an order  awarding  damages
against the Company in the amount of AU$6,000,000 or approximately  US$3,300,000
as a result of the  Company  notifying  third  parties  in the U.S.  with  which
Advanced Communications (Australia) was dealing in regard to SpectruCell, of the
Australia Court's August 23, 2002 injunctive  orders. The Company believes based
on information made available to it, that Advanced Communications  (Australia)'s
proposed claims for damages are without merit. As far as the Company knows,  the
Australia  Court  has not  awarded  any costs and has not  awarded  any  damages
against  the  Company.  It is not known if such awards will be made and, if they
are made, what their amounts will be.

                                       10
<PAGE>


ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

         On September 11, 2001 a Special Meeting of Stockholders was held at our
offices in Irvine,  California. At this meeting, our stockholders authorized the
following changes to our Articles of Incorporation:

         1. To increase  our authorized shares of  common stock from 100,000,000
shares to 200,000,000;

         2. To provide for a class of 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock which
will have such  terms as the Board of  Directors  shall  determine  from time to
time; and

         3. To provide for indemnification of our officers, directors, employees
and agents to the full extent permitted by law.

         A Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of  Incorporation  embodying
the above changes was filed in Florida on September 27, 2001.



                                       11
<PAGE>


                                     PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

         Our common stock is currently traded on the  Over-the-Counter  Bulletin
Board  ("OTCBB")  under the symbol "ADVC".  As of November 15, 2002,  there were
118,852,622  common shares  outstanding and approximately 414 holders of record.
We believe that the number of beneficial  owners is  substantially  greater than
the number of record holders because a large portion of our common stock is held
in "broker" or "street names".

         The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods  indicated,  the
bid price range of our common stock:

                                                   HIGH BID          LOW BID

             2001

             Quarter Ended September 30, 2000         $1.25           $ .560
             Quarter Ended December 31, 2000           1.19             .480
             Quarter Ended March 31, 2001              1.03             .450
             Quarter Ended June 30, 2001                .68             .270

             2002

             Quarter Ended September 30, 2001         $ .41           $ .250
             Quarter Ended December 31, 2001            .38             .170
             Quarter Ended March 31, 2002               .26             .060
             Quarter Ended June 30, 2002                .08             .020

             2003

             Quarter Ended September 30, 2002         $ .08           $ .005

         Such market quotations reflect the high bid and low prices as reflected
by the OTCBB or by prices,  without retail mark-up,  markdown or commissions and
may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

         We did not pay any dividends during fiscal 2002 and have never paid any
dividends on our capital stock.  We currently  expect that we will retain future
earnings  for use in the  operation  and  expansion  of our  business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable  future. Any decision on
the future  payment of  dividends  will  depend on our  earnings  and  financial
position  at that time and such other  factors as the Board of  Directors  deems
relevant.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

         All issuances of restricted stock have been valued based on the closing
price of the stock as of the date the Company's Board of Directors  approved the
grant of shares.

         On October 10, 2002,  the  Company's  Board of  Directors  approved the
issuance of 100,000 shares each to Messrs. Danson, Prouty,  Lichtman,  Roche and
Finch,  having a value of $1,000 each in partial  satisfaction  of unpaid  prior
legal and consulting fees. These shares have not yet been issued.

         On both August 26, 2002 and  September  24,  2002,  the Company  issued
1,460,725  and  664,275  shares  of  common  stock to AJW  Partners  LLC and New
Millennium  Capital  Partners II, LLC,  respectively,  in full settlement of the
Company's  outstanding  obligation  on the  remaining  September  30,  1999  12%
Convertible  Debenture.  April 24,  2002 and June 4, 2002,  we issued a total of
2,921,450  and  1,328,550  shares of common stock to AJW  Partners,  LLC and New
Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC respectively, in satisfaction of $100,343 of
the September 30, 1999 12% Secured Convertible Debentures.

         On or about May 3,  2002,  we  issued  1,100,000  shares of  restricted
common stock having a value of $55,000 to Randy Prouty, our Chairman,  for prior
consulting services.


                                       12
<PAGE>


         On or about May 3, 2002, we issued 111,290 shares of restricted  common
stock  having a value of $5,565 to Simon  Sigalos and  Spyredes,  P.A. for prior
legal services.

         On or about May 3, 2002 we issued 800,000  shares of restricted  common
stock having a value of $40,000 to Danson Partners,  LLC for consulting services
rendered during fiscal 2002.

         On or about May 3, 2002 we issued 800,000  shares of restricted  common
stock  having a value of $40,000 to Levinson and  Lichtman,  LLP for prior legal
services.

         On or about May 3, 2002 we issued 300,000  shares of restricted  common
stock having a value of $15,000 to Roche and Holt for prior legal services.

         On or about May 3, 2002 we issued 10,000  shares of  restricted  common
stock having a value of $500 to Dynamic Voice Networks for  consulting  services
rendered during fiscal 2002.

         On or about March 26, 2002,  666,667  shares  having a value of $50,000
were issued to Danson  Partners,  LLC for consulting  services  rendered  during
fiscal 2002.

         On or about March 26, 2002,  666,667  shares  having a value of $50,000
were issued to  Levinson &  Lichtman,  LLP for legal  services  rendered  during
fiscal 2002.

         On or about March 26, 2002,  400,000  shares  having a value of $30,000
were issued to Jack  Halperin,  Esq. for legal services  rendered  during fiscal
2002.

         On or about March 26, 2002,  133,334  shares  having a value of $10,000
were issued to Dr.  Michael  Finch for  professional  services  rendered  during
fiscal 2002.

         On or about March 26, 2002, 27,800 shares having a value of $2,085 were
issued to The Law Offices of Alan Foxman for prior legal services.

         On or about March 26,  2002,  119,000  shares  having a value of $8,925
were issued to DDInvestor.com, Inc. for prior investor relations services.

         On or about February 27, 2002, 2,146,967 shares and associated warrants
were issued to all (23) of the individual private placement investors.

         On or about  February  7, 2002,  160,000  shares each having a value of
$40,000 were each issued to Eduardo Acosta and Alberto Monteiro in settlement of
the World IP recession lawsuit.

         On or  about  January  28,  2002,  2,960,000  shares  having a value of
$740,000 were issued to Cornell Capital  Partners,  LP as a one-time  commitment
fee for the $30 million Equity Line of Credit facility.

         On or about  January 28, 2002,  40,000 shares having a value of $10,000
were  issued to Westrock  Advisors,  Inc.  for  financial  advisory  services in
connection with the Equity Line of Credit facility.

         In January 2002, Advanced  Communications  entered into the Equity Line
of Credit  Agreement  where  Advanced  Communications  may,  at its  discretion,
periodically  issue and sell to Cornell Capital Partners,  L.P. shares of common
stock for a total purchase  price of $30 million.  The amount of each advance is
subject to an aggregate  maximum  advance amount of $2 million in any thirty-day
period. Cornell Capital Partners,  L.P. will purchase the shares of common stock
for a 9%  discount  to the  prevailing  market  price of our  common  stock.  In
addition,  Cornell  Capital  Partners is  entitled to retain 3% of each  advance
under the Equity  Line of Credit,  together  with a one-time  commitment  fee of
$740,000,  payable in shares of its common stock. On January 28, 2002, we issued
2,960,000 shares of our restricted common stock to Cornell Capital Partners,  LP
with a  market  value  of  $740,000  as a  commitment  fee for  the $30  million
structured  equity line facility.  Cornell Capital  Partners intends to sell any
shares  purchased under the Equity Line of Credit at the then prevailing  market
price. Additionally,  Westrock Advisors, Inc. was paid a fee of 40,000 shares of
Advanced  Communications'  common stock,  which is equal to $10,000 at a closing
bid of $0.25 on January 10, 2002 for acting as the placement agent.


                                       13
<PAGE>


         In January  2002,  Advanced  Communications  entered  into a Securities
Purchase   Agreement  with  Cornell  Capital  Partners  and  other  third  party
investors,  where they shall issue and sell to Buyers up to One Million  Dollars
of convertible  debentures Advanced  Communications has outstanding  convertible
debentures with an original  principal  balance of $1,000,000.  These debentures
are convertible  into shares of common stock at a price equal to equal to either
(a) an amount  equal to one  hundred  twenty  percent  (120%) of the closing bid
price of the common stock as of the closing date or $0.40,  whichever is higher,
or (b) an amount equal to eighty  percent (80%) of the lowest  closing bid price
of the  common  stock  for the  five  trading  days  immediately  preceding  the
conversion  date. If such conversion had taken place at $0.016 (i.e., 80% of the
recent price of $0.02),  then the holders of the  convertible  debentures  would
have received  62,500,000 shares of common stock.  These convertible  debentures
accrue  interest  at a rate 5% per  year  and are  convertible  at the  holder's
option.  These  convertible  debentures  have a term of two years.  At  Advanced
Communications'  option,  these  debentures may be paid in cash or redeemed at a
20%  premium  prior to  January  2004.  The  convertible  debentures  contain  a
beneficial  conversion  feature  computed  at its  intrinsic  value  that is the
difference  between  the  conversion  price and the fair value on the  debenture
issuance date of the common stock into which the debt is convertible, multiplied
by the number of shares  into which the debt is  convertible  at the  commitment
date.  Since the  beneficial  conversion  feature  is to be  settled  by issuing
equity, the amount attributed to the beneficial conversion feature, of $250,000,
was  recorded as an interest  expense and a component  of equity on the issuance
date.

         On January 22, 2002, our directors,  excluding Mr. May and Mr. Roberts,
pursuant  to a January  4, 2002 Board of  Directors  Meeting,  were each  issued
200,000 shares for a total of 1,000,000  shares of our  restricted  common stock
for  services  rendered to us as directors  for the 2001 and 2002 fiscal  years.
Each director received $36,000 worth of stock as compensation.

         On  November  8, 2001,  34,449  shares  having a value of $10,335  were
issued to James Rennie for prior accrued expenses.

         On October 15,  2001,  286,667  shares  having a value of $86,000  were
issued to Levinson & Lichtman,  LLP for legal services rendered through June 30,
2001.

         On October  15,  2001,  33,334  shares  having a value of $10,000  were
issued to Groman Ross & Tisman for prior legal services.

         On October  15,  2001,  65,231  shares  having a value of $20,000  were
issued to Danson  Partners,  LLC for  consulting  services for the period August
through September 2001.

         On October 15,  2001,  137,727  shares  having a value of $41,318  were
issued to Attkisson Carter & Co. for private placement

fees.

         On August 29,  2001,  566,159  shares  having a value of $180,000  were
issued to Danson Partners, LLC for consulting services for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2001.

         On August 29,  2001,  133,333  shares  having a value of  $40,000  were
issued to Jack Halperin, Esq. for prior legal services.

         On August 29, 2001,  30,000 shares having a value of $9,000 were issued
to Trois Mousquetaires for prior legal services.

         On August 29, 2001, 50,748 shares having a value of $15,224 were issued
to Sean Repko for prior accrued expenses.

         During the period of December  2000 to  September  2001,  pursuant to a
private placement under Regulation D, Rule 506, Advanced  Communications  issued
4,293,933  shares of common  stock and  4,293,933  warrants  at $.30 per  share.
Advanced  Communications  received $1,288,180 from 23 investors,  which included
$250,000 for stock not yet issued as of June 30, 2001 and $275,454 for warrants.
Advanced  Communications  issued  137,729  and 250,000  shares of common  stock,
valued  at  $41,318  and  $75,000,   in  payment  of  offering   costs  incurred
respectively.  The  value  assigned  to this  stock  was  based  on the  private
placement  memorandum of $.30 per share.  The value of the common stock has been
charged to equity as direct costs to the offering.  The fair market value of the
warrants,  aggregating  $275,454,  was  estimated  on the grant  date  using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model as required under FASB 123 with the following
weighted average  assumptions:  expected dividend yield 0%,  volatility  49.84%,
risk-free  interest  rate  4.22%,  expected  option  life 2 years.  To date,  no
warrants  have been  exercised.  On February  27,  2002,  our Board of Directors
approved a resolution to reprice the private  placement  offering from $0.30 per


                                       14
<PAGE>


share to $0.20 per share.  The Board of Directors  repriced  these shares due to
the delay in registering the shares sold to investors in the private  placement.
The Company did not receive any  consideration  for the repricing of the shares.
This  repricing  resulted in the issuance of an additional  2,146,967  shares of
common  stock  and  warrants  to  the  23  private  placement  investors.  These
additional  shares are included in the number of shares that we are  registering
for these selling  shareholders.  The exercise price of the underlying  warrants
remains at $0.30 per share.

         Between October and December 2000, AJW Partners, LLC and New Millennium
Capital  Partners II, LLC elected to convert  $262,800 of their 12%  Convertible
Debentures  into 860,378 shares of Advanced  Communications'  restricted  common
stock.  The Company is in default of its remaining  obligations to AJW Partners,
LLC and New  Millennium  Capital  Partners II, LLC and on April 24, 2002 entered
into a Settlement Agreement.  Under the terms of the Settlement  Agreement,  the
Company is obligated to issue,  over a 180 day period,  8,500,000  shares of its
common stock in exchange for the dismissal of the lawsuit and in satisfaction of
the remaining  outstanding  principal and accrued interest.  The Company had the
option,  until July 23, 2002, to substitute cash in lieu of shares.  On closing,
the  Company  issued  1,460,725  and 664,275  shares of its common  stock to AJW
Partners,  LLC and New  Millennium  Capital  Partners II, LLC,  respectively.  A
Stipulation and Order of Discontinuance  was filed with and Ordered by the court
on April 25, 2002. On June 4, 2002 the Company  issued an  additional  1,460,725
and  664,275  shares  of common  stock to AJW  Partners  LLC and New  Millennium
Capital  Partners,  II, LLC. On both August 26, 2002 and September 24, 2002, the
Company issued  1,460,725 and 664,275 shares of common stock to AJW Partners LLC
and New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC, respectively, in full settlement of
the Company's  outstanding  obligation  on the remaining  September 30, 1999 12%
Convertible Debenture.

         With respect to the sale of unregistered  securities  referenced above,
all  transactions  were exempt from  registration  pursuant Rule 506 promulgated
under the  Securities  Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act").  These  offerings  may have
qualified  for other  exemptions as well.  In each  instance,  the purchaser had
access to sufficient information regarding Advanced Communications so as to make
an informed investment decision. More specifically,  Advanced Communications had
a reasonable  basis to believe that each purchaser was an "accredited  investor"
as defined  in  Regulation  D of the 1933 Act,  which  information  was based on
representations  received from such  investors,  and otherwise had the requisite
sophistication to make an investment in Advanced Communications' securities.

<TABLE>
ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<CAPTION>

                                                                   FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                       -----------------------------------------------------
                                                            2002                2001                 2000
                                                       -----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>                 <C>                  <C>
Revenue                                                $          --       $      50,000        $         --
Cost of Revenue                                                   --              57,310                  --
Gross Profit (Loss)                                               --             (7,310)                  --
Operating Expenses                                         2,314,570           3,334,581           4,635,186
Operating (Loss)                                         (2,314,570)         (3,341,891)         (4,635,186)
(Loss) from Investment                                            --         (3,571,654)                  --
(Loss) from Goodwill Impairment                          (1,700,000)        (12,399,864)                  --
Other Expense (Net of $23,000 of Extraordinary
Gain in Fiscal 2001)                                       (318,123)           (419,157)                  --
(Loss) Before Income Taxes                               (4,332,693)        (19,732,566)         (5,110,427)
Provision for Income Taxes                                        --                  --                  --
Net (Loss)                                               (4,332,693)        (19,732,566)         (5,110,427)
Net (Loss) Per Share:
  Basic and Diluted                                    $       (.04)       $       (.22)        $      (.07)
Pro Forma Weighted Average Shares:
  Basic and Dilutive                                     100,576,484          87,976,428          77,107,560
                                                       =============       =============        ============

</TABLE>


                                                       15
<PAGE>


                                            FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                ---------------------------------------------
                                     2002            2001             2000
                                ---------------------------------------------

Cash and Cash Equivalents       $     11,093    $     6,816      $     30,154
Working Capital (Deficiency)     (3,252,643)    (2,421,719)       (1,424,473)
Total Assets                         114,852      2,041,940        19,714,622
Total Debt                         5,054,902      4,611,702         9,007,570
(Deficiency)/Equity              (4,940,050)    (2,569,762)        10,707,052


ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
         RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

         The  following  discussion  should  be read  in  conjunction  with  our
financial  statements and the related notes and the other financial  information
appearing elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical  information,  the
following   discussion   and  other   parts  of  this  Annual   Report   contain
forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties.

         The  Company  has  limited  resources,   has  incurred  cumulative  net
operating  losses of $29,848,648 and expects to incur  additional  losses unless
the SpectruCell  product,  when  developed,  is made available to us for sale to
military  and  commercial  customers  in North and South  America.  Based on the
litigation with Advanced  Communications  (Australia) and the current situation,
it is unclear if this will ever occur. We currently do not have any marketing or
promotional  employees or engineers  to market and sell  SpectruCell.  Moreover,
given the litigation  between the Company,  Mr. May and Advanced  Communications
(Australia),  we have no reliable  information on the status of the  SpectruCell
product and when it will be available, if at all, to military users and be field
tested for commercial applications.  In the interim, in order for us to continue
operating,  we will require  additional  funding.  Assuming that the SpectruCell
product  will  be  developed  and  made   available  to  us  for  marketing  and
distribution in our exclusive  territory,  we believe that we will need funds to
re-build our  marketing  and sales team,  hire  qualified  engineers and pay our
debts  which  include  $1,044,676  of accounts  payable  and  accrued  expenses,
$1,062,917 of convertible  debentures and other  obligations of $2,846,902.  Our
plans with regard to these matters include  continuing to minimize the company's
infrastructure  costs while seeking  additional capital through the draw down of
our Equity Line of Credit facility and from other sources until such time as the
SpectruCell  product becomes  available to us for marketing and  distribution to
military and commercial  customers.  Although we continue to pursue these plans,
there is no  assurance  that  SpectruCell  will ever be  completed  and become a
commercially  viable  product,  that we will be able to  exercise  our rights to
market and distribute SpectruCell in North and South America, or that we will be
successful  in  obtaining  sufficient  financing on terms  acceptable  to us, or
establish  the marketing  team and network  necessary to enable us to do so. The
financial  statements do not include any adjustments  that might result from the
outcome of this  uncertainty.  Unless the company is able to activate its Equity
Line of Credit  facility  within the near future,  management  will be unable to
continue operating the company.

         Since  inception  in April  1999,  our  efforts  have been  principally
devoted to describing and marketing the to- be developed SpectruCell  technology
to U.S. based customers, building an infrastructure of marketing,  technical and
administrative support staff to support our future sales efforts at such time as
SpectruCell  became  available to the military and commercial  marketplaces  and
raising  capital.  Since  inception  through  June 30, 2002,  we have  sustained
cumulative net losses of $29,848,648,  including  non-cash charges in the amount
of $19,350,000  for the write-off of our  investment in Advanced  Communications
(Australia).  In  addition,  a non-cash  charge of  $4,580,762  was  incurred in
connection  with the issuance of stock for  services.  Our losses have  resulted
primarily from  expenditures  incurred in connection with costs  associated with
unsuccessful   acquisitions,   office   infrastructure  costs  and  general  and
administrative  expenses.  From  inception  through  June  30,  2002,  the  cost
associated with unsuccessful  acquisitions  amounted to $961,340 and general and
administrative  costs  amounted to  $4,956,546.  From  inception  we have earned
$50,000 in revenues from the sale of international  wholesale  telephone minutes
and effective July 1, 2001, we terminated this business.

         No sales of  SpectruCell  have  been  made by  Advanced  Communications
(Australia)  or us. We are a marketing  company whose primary focus has been the
licensing  and  distribution  of a product for the  wireless  telecommunications
industry  known as  SpectruCell.  SpectruCell  was being  developed  by Advanced
Communications  Technologies  (Australia)  Pty  Ltd.  ("Advanced  Communications
(Australia)"),  an insolvent  development  stage company in which we owned a 20%
interest.  We own the North and South  America  rights to market and  distribute
SpectruCell,  which we acquired in our 1999 merger with Advanced  Communications
(Nevada).  The  Company's  business  plan is to market,  license and  distribute
SpectruCell  when the product is developed and made  available to the commercial
and military  market.  The Company  currently does not perform any activities in
connection  with  marketing,   licensing  or   distributing   SpectruCell.   The


                                       16
<PAGE>


SpectruCell  product  is  still  in  development  and it is  uncertain  when its
development will be completed and the product available to the marketplace.

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

         Financial  Reporting Release No. 60, which was recently released by the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  requires  all  companies  to  include  a
discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of
financial statements. Note 2 of the Notes to the Financial Statements includes a
summary  of  the  significant  accounting  policies  and  methods  used  in  the
preparation of our Financial Statements.  The following is a brief discussion of
the more  significant  accounting  policies and methods used by us. In addition,
Financial  Reporting  Release No. 61 was recently released by the Securities and
Exchange Commission to require all companies to include a discussion to address,
among  other  things,  liquidity,  off-balance  sheet  arrangement,  contractual
obligations and commercial commitments.

         NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

         The Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board has recently issued several
new Statements of Financial Accounting  Standards.  Statement No. 141, "Business
Combinations"  supersedes  APB  Opinion 16 and various  related  pronouncements.
Pursuant to the new  guidance in Statement  No. 141,  all business  combinations
must  be  accounted   for  under  the  purchase   method  of   accounting;   the
pooling-of-interests  method is no longer  permitted.  SFAS 141 also establishes
new rules  concerning the  recognition of goodwill and other  intangible  assets
arising in a purchase  business  combination  and  requires  disclosure  of more
information  concerning  a  business  combination  in the  period in which it is
completed.  This  statement is  generally  effective  for business  combinations
initiated on or after July 1, 2001.

         Statement No. 142,  "Goodwill and Other Intangible  Assets"  supersedes
APB Opinion 17 and related  interpretations.  Statement No. 142  establishes new
rules on accounting for the  acquisition of intangible  assets not acquired in a
business  combination and the manner in which goodwill and all other intangibles
should be accounted for  subsequent to their initial  recognition  in a business
combination  accounted  for under SFAS No. 141.  Under SFAS No. 142,  intangible
assets  should be recorded at fair value.  Intangible  assets with finite useful
lives  should be  amortized  over such  period and those with  indefinite  lives
should not be amortized.  All intangible assets being amortized as well as those
that are not, are both subject to review for potential impairment under SFAS No.
121,  "Accounting  for the  Impairment of Long-Lived  Assets and for  Long-Lived
Assets to be Disposed of". SFAS No. 142 also requires that goodwill arising in a
business  combination  should not be  amortized  but is  subject  to  impairment
testing at the reporting unit level to which the goodwill was assigned to at the
date of the business combination.

         SFAS No. 142 is effective for years  beginning  after December 15, 2001
and must be applied as of the  beginning  of such year to all goodwill and other
intangible assets that have already been recorded in the balance sheet as of the
first day in which SFAS No. 142 is initially  applied,  regardless  of when such
assets  were  acquired.  Goodwill  acquired  in  a  business  combination  whose
acquisition  date is on or after July 1,  2001,  should  not be  amortized,  but
should be reviewed for impairment pursuant to SFAS No. 121, even though SFAS No.
142 has not yet been  adopted.  However,  previously  acquired  goodwill  should
continue to be amortized  until SFAS No. 142 is first  adopted.  The Company has
adopted the  provisions of SFAS 142 in its financial  statements  for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2002.

         Statement  No.  143  "Accounting  for  Asset  Retirement   Obligations"
establishes  standards for the initial measurement and subsequent accounting for
obligations associated with the sale, abandonment,  or other type of disposal of
long-lived  tangible  assets  arising  from the  acquisition,  construction,  or
development  and/or normal  operation of such assets.  SFAS No. 143 is effective
for years beginning after June 15, 2002, with earlier application encouraged.

         In  August  2001,  the  FASB  issued  SFAS  144,  "Accounting  for  the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This statement addresses financial
accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and
supercedes FASB Statement No. 121,  "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for  Long-Lived  Assets to be  Disposed  of." The  provisions  of the
statement  are  effective  for  financial  statements  issued for  fiscal  years
beginning after December 15, 2001.

         With the  exception  of the  adoption of SFAS No. 142,  the adoption of
these  pronouncements is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's
financial position or results of operations.


                                       17
<PAGE>


YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2001

         OVERALL RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

         For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, we incurred an overall loss of
$(4,332,693)  or ($.04) per share which was a substantial  decrease from the net
loss of  $(19,732,566)  or $(0.22)  per share for the  comparable  period in the
prior  year.  The net  losses  for the 2002  and 2001  fiscal  years  include  a
$1,700,000 and $15,971,518 loss from the write-off of our investment in Advanced
Communications (Australia), respectively.

         REVENUE

         We did not generate any revenue  during the year.  Revenue for the year
ended June 30, 2001 was $50,000 and was realized  entirely from our subsidiary's
U.S.-Pakistan  international telephone distribution network. We ceased operating
our  international  telephone  services  network  on June 30,  2001  because  of
regulatory  difficulties  we encountered  in our target  market.  We realized no
revenue from the sale and/or license of the SpectruCell product, as such product
was not ready to be commercially sold in our territory.

         OPERATING EXPENSES

         Total  operating  expenses for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 and
June 30, 2001 were $2,314,570 and $3,334,581  respectively  and represents a 31%
decrease from the prior fiscal year. Of these amounts, $1,228,780 and $1,214,739
or 53% and 36%  respectively,  were for professional  services rendered of which
$677,634 and  $296,870  during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 and June 30,
2001,  respectively,  was paid via the issuance of  restricted  common stock and
represent a non-cash  expense.  During the fiscal  years ended June 30, 2002 and
June 30, 2001,  we paid  $246,782 and  $307,002  respectively,  in cash fees for
professional services rendered.

         Depreciation and amortization  expense decreased by $543,002 due to the
write-off of the unamortized  balance of goodwill associated with our investment
in Advanced Communications (Australia) as of June 30, 2002.

         Consulting  fees during  fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 of  $(10,149),
which include employee  payments,  decreased $577,774 from the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2001 of $567,625 due to the  curtailment  of our  employees and outside
consultants  during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 as well as the  reversal
of $394,361 of accrued  compensation  due Mr. May,  our former  Chief  Executive
Officer  and  Chairman.  During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 and June 30,
2001,  $0 and $32,000,  respectively,  was paid via the  issuance of  restricted
common stock and represents a non-cash expense.

         Other general and  administrative  expenses  (exclusive of professional
fees,  consulting  expenses and other non-cash charges) amounted to $407,772 for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, a decrease of $93,276 from the prior fiscal
year.

         Interest expense increased $307,791 from the fiscal year ended June 30,
2001 due  principally  to the issuance,  in January 2002, of our 5%  Convertible
Debentures.  $250,000 of the increase in interest expense is attributable to the
intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature included in the convertible
debentures.

         Other  expense  for the  fiscal  year ended  June 30,  2002  includes a
$1,700,000  loss from  impairment of Goodwill  associated with our investment in
Advanced Communications (Australia). The impairment loss of $1,700,000 was based
on  management's  evaluation,  in  accordance  with FASB 121 and SFAS 142 of the
carrying value of our  investment in Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  The
decision to  write-down  our  remaining  Goodwill was based  principally  on the
ongoing financial  difficulties of Advanced  Communications  (Australia) and its
filing for voluntary  administration  (bankruptcy) in Australia on or about July
18, 2002.

         Other  expense  for the  fiscal  year ended  June 30,  2001  includes a
one-time write-off of $425,000 attributable to the abandonment of our investment
deposit for the proposed  acquisition of the ORBCOMM assets.  It also includes a
$12,399,864 loss on the write-down of Goodwill associated with our investment in
Advanced  Communications  (Australia),  as well as the  write-off of  $3,571,654
representing  our  remaining  equity   investment  in  Advanced   Communications
(Australia).  The write-down in Advanced Communications (Australia) was based on
management's  evaluation of the business  prospects,  which were necessitated by
FASB 121  ("Accounting  for  Impairment of Long Lived  Assets") and APB 18 ("The
Equity  Method  of  Accounting   for   Investments  in  Common   Stock").   Such
pronouncements   require  the  annual   evaluation  of  long-lived   assets  for
impairment.  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  has been in the  development
stage  since  inception,  and has not made any  sales.  Based on these  factors,


                                       18
<PAGE>


management  believed that the carrying  value of the good will in the investment
should be  reduced to  $2,000,000,  resulting  in a  $12,399,864  write-down  of
goodwill.

         EXTRAORDINARY GAIN

         Extraordinary  gain for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001  included a
$23,000 gain on the issuance of our restricted common stock to unrelated vendors
of Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  in excess of the then  current  market
value. In fiscal 2002, we realized no extraordinary gains.

YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000

         REVENUE

         We realized nominal revenue during the year from sales of international
telephone  services into Pakistan through our international  network  providers.
Such  revenue  represented  a 100%  increase  from the  prior  year.  We  ceased
operating our international  telephone  services network during the year because
of regulatory  difficulties we encountered in our target market.  We realized no
revenue from the sale and/or license of the SpectruCell product, as such product
was not ready to be commercially sold in our territory.

         OPERATING EXPENSES

         Total  operating  expenses for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001 and
June 30, 2000 were $3,334,581 and $4,635,186  respectively  and represents a 28%
decrease from the prior fiscal year. Of these amounts, $1,214,739 and $3,409,038
or 36% and 74%  respectively,  were for professional  services rendered of which
$328,870 (27%) and $3,009,388  (88%) during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001
and June 30, 2000, respectively,  was paid via the issuance of restricted common
stock and represent a non-cash  expense.  During the fiscal years ended June 30,
2001 and June 30, 2000, we paid $307,002 and $215,756 respectively, in cash fees
for professional  services rendered.  Professional fees decreased  substantially
from the  prior  year due  principally  to the fact  that  shares  issued in the
current fiscal year in exchange for professional  services  rendered were issued
at a lower price per share than the prior fiscal year.

         Depreciation and amortization  expense increased by $800,674 due to the
full year  amortization  of goodwill  associated with our investment in Advanced
Communications (Australia).

         Consulting fees, which includes employee payments,  increased nominally
from the prior  year.  During the fiscal  year ended June 30,  2001 and June 30,
2000, $32,000 and $259,970 respectively, was paid via the issuance of restricted
common stock and represents a non-cash expense.

         Other general and  administrative  expenses  (exclusive of professional
fees,  consulting  expenses and other non-cash charges) amounted to $501,048 for
the fiscal  year ended June 30,  2001,  an  increase  of $88,938  from the prior
fiscal year.

         Interest expense decreased $736,778 from the fiscal year ended June 30,
2000  due  principally  to the  issuance,  in  September  1999,  of our  Secured
Convertible  Debentures.  Approximately  $715,000  of the  decrease  in interest
expense is attributable to the intrinsic value of the convertible  debentures as
well as bond issuance costs charged to interest expense in fiscal 2000.

         Other  income  (expense)  includes a  one-time  write-off  of  $425,000
attributable  to the  abandonment  of our  investment  deposit for the  proposed
acquisition  of the ORBCOMM  assets and $192,474 of other income  recognized  in
fiscal 2000 on the abandonment of certain  accounts payable and accrued expenses
of MFI. It also includes a $12,399,864  loss in fiscal 2001 on the write-down of
Goodwill associated with our investment in Advanced Communications  (Australia),
as well as an increase of $3,485,836 in our share of a full year's loss from our
equity  ownership in Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  The  write-down  in
Advanced Communications  (Australia) was based on management's evaluation of the
business  prospects,  which  were  necessitated  by FASB  121  ("Accounting  for
Impairment  of Long Lived  Assets") and APB 18 ("The Equity Method of Accounting
for  Investments  in Common  Stock").  Such  pronouncements  require  the annual
evaluation  of  long-lived  assets  for  impairment.   Advanced   Communications
(Australia) has been in the development stage since inception,  and has not made
sales.  Based on these factors,  management  believed that the carrying value of
the good will in the investment should be reduced to $2,000,000,  resulting in a
$12,399,864 write-down of goodwill.


                                       19
<PAGE>


         EXTRAORDINARY GAIN

         Extraordinary  gain for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001  included a
$23,000 gain on the issuance of our restricted common stock to unrelated vendors
of Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  in excess of the then  current  market
value.  In fiscal  2000,  we  realized  extraordinary  gains of  $242,561 on the
extinguishments  of prior  shareholder  loans in  exchange  for  600,000  of our
restricted  common stock,  and $34,507 on the  settlement of the Grassland  loan
payable. The prior shareholders were not shareholders of Advanced Communications
at the time these loans were forgiven.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

         OVERVIEW

         Since inception,  our operations have been financed through the private
sales of common stock and  convertible  debentures and from unsecured loans from
an entity  controlled  by Mr.  Roger May, a former  officer and  director of our
company  and a  shareholder.  We have  raised  approximately  $3,900,000  before
offering costs through the sale of these securities and have borrowed $1,055,736
from an entity wholly owned by Mr. May.  These loans are  non-interest  bearing,
are  unsecured,  and have no fixed date for repayment.  Advanced  Communications
does not  believe  that the  loans  are due upon  demand.  However,  the  actual
repayment  terms  are not  known  with any  specificity  since the terms are not
contained in a written  document.  At June 30,  2002,  our  principal  source of
liquidity was $11,093 of cash and cash equivalents. We have no credit facilities
in place.  On  January  10,  2002,  we  entered  into an  Equity  Line of Credit
Agreement with Cornell  Capital  Partners,  L.P.  Pursuant to the Equity Line of
Credit, we may, at our discretion, periodically sell to Cornell Capital Partners
shares of common stock for a total purchase  price of up to $30.0  million.  For
each share of common stock  purchased  under the Equity Line of Credit,  Cornell
Capital  Partners  will pay 91% of the  lowest  closing  bid price of our common
stock on the Over-the-Counter  Bulletin Board or other principal market on which
our common stock is traded for the 5 days immediately following the notice date.
Cornell  Capital  Partners  is a  private  limited  partnership  whose  business
operations are conducted through its general partner,  Yorkville Advisors,  LLC.
Further, Cornell Capital Partners will be paid a fee of 3% of each advance under
the Equity Line of Credit as a fee. In addition,  we engaged Westrock  Advisors,
Inc., a registered  broker-dealer,  to advise us in  connection  with the Equity
Line of Credit. For its services, Westrock Advisors, Inc. received 40,000 shares
of our common  stock.  The  effectiveness  of the sale of the  shares  under the
Equity Line of Credit is conditioned  upon us  registering  the shares of common
stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Our Equity Line of Credit is
not yet  effective  and the  Company  has not  drawn  down any  funds  from this
facility.  Except for the  Equity  Line of Credit,  we have no  commitments  for
capital and no other sources of internal and external financing.  As of February
25,  2003,  substantially  all of our  authorized  shares of common  stock  were
outstanding. As a result, we do not have any shares of common stock available to
issue under the Equity Line of Credit, in other capital raising  transactions or
otherwise. This means that we will not be able to raise capital from the sale of
common stock,  whether under the Equity Line of Credit or otherwise,  unless the
majority of our  outstanding  shares of common stock vote to approve an increase
to the number of shares of common stock that we are authorized to issue. We plan
to seek approval from our shareholders to increase our authorized  common stock,
although no assurances  can be given that such  approval  will be obtained.  Our
failure  to  obtain  such  approval  will mean that we will not be able to raise
capital  under  the  Equity  Line of Credit  or from the sale of our  stock.  In
addition,  we do not  anticipate  being able to obtain loans given our financial
position.  We will not be able to  re-commence  operations  and may be forced to
liquidate if we are unable to obtain such shareholder approval.

         We  anticipate  that our cash needs over the next 12 months  consist of
general  working  capital needs of $600,000,  plus the repayment of  outstanding
indebtedness of $3,263,736.  These obligations include  outstanding  convertible
debentures in the amount of $1,163,324,  as well as accounts payable and accrued
expenses in the amount of  $872,493,  accrued  compensation  of $172,183  and an
unsecured,  non-interest-bearing loan payable to an entity wholly-owned by Roger
May, a former officer and director and a significant shareholder. As of June 30,
2002,  we had a working  capital  deficiency of  $3,252,643.  As a result of our
working capital  shortfalls,  we have ceased virtually all business  operations,
except for minimal operations in attempting to raise capital and to file reports
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

         The Company has total  liabilities  of  $5,054,902 as of June 30, 2002.
Included  in  this  total  are  contractual  obligations  of  $2,035,817.  These
contractual  obligations,  along with the dates on which such  payments are due,
are described below:


                                       20
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
                                                                 PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              1               2-3             4-5          AFTER 5
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS                     TOTAL        YEAR OR LESS        YEARS           YEARS          YEARS
--------------------------------------   -----------    --------------    -----------     -----------    -----------
<S>                                      <C>              <C>             <C>               <C>
Note Payable                             $      -- *      $       --      $        --       $     --       $     --
Convertible Debentures                     1,163,324         100,407        1,062,917             --             --
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses        872,493         872,493               --             --             --
                                         -----------    ------------      -----------     ----------     ----------
Total Contractual Obligations            $ 2,035,817      $  972,900      $ 1,062,917       $     --       $     --
                                         ===========    ============      ===========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>

*        Excludes  $1,791,166 due to Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  The
         Company  believes that this  obligation  has been cancelled by Advanced
         Communications (Australia) due to Advanced Communications (Australia)'s
         unilateral  revocation of the Stock Purchase Agreement and is no longer
         obligated to pay this.

         Our only source of funds to repay these  obligations will come from our
Equity Line of Credit  facility.  We have no other source of funds,  internal or
external with which to repay our contractual obligations.

         If we are unable to obtain  additional  funding through our Equity Line
of Credit facility, this will have a material adverse effect on our business and
our ability to continue as a going concern.  As a consequence,  we may be forced
to seek  protection  under the  bankruptcy  laws.  In that event,  it is unclear
whether we could  successfully  reorganize our capital structure and operations,
or  whether we could  realize  sufficient  value for our  assets to satisfy  our
creditors  in full.  Accordingly,  should we be  forced  to file for  bankruptcy
protection, there is no assurance that our stockholders would receive any value.

         Below is a  discussion  of our  sources  and  uses of funds  for the 12
months ended June 30, 2002.

NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES

         Net cash used in operating  activities was $1,479,999 and $1,103,254 in
the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, respectively.  The use of cash by
operating  activities  was  principally  the  result of net losses  during  both
reporting periods together with a reduction in accrued compensation and deferred
revenue in fiscal years ended 2002 and 2001, respectively.

NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

         We used net cash of $247,608 and $25,000  during the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2001 and 2002,  respectively,  for the repayment of our loan payable to
Advanced  Communications   (Australia).   As  of  June  30,  2002,  the  balance
outstanding  to  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  on the loan  payable  is
$1,791,166. During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001 and 2002, we used $8,411
and $1,625 respectively, to purchase office equipment.

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED) IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES

         Net cash provided by financing  activities  for the year ended June 30,
2002 was $1,134,206 and was due to the net proceeds received from the sale of 5%
convertible  debentures in January 2002 in the amount of $863,000  (inclusive of
cash received from the $325,000  December 2001 bridge loan and net of $26,000 in
financing  fees),  $130,000  received  from  the  private  placement  of  equity
securities  that  commenced  December 2000 and ended August 2001 and $259,736 of
loan proceeds received from Global Communications  Technology Pty Ltd, an entity
wholly owned by Roger May, a former officer and director of the company.

         Net cash  provided by  financing  activities  for the fiscal year ended
June  30,  2001 was  $1,712,680  and was due to the  receipt  of  $1,168,180  of
proceeds from the sale of equity  securities  pursuant to the Company's  private
placement  that  commenced in December  2000 and ended August 2001. In addition,
the Company  received  $544,500  of loan  proceeds  from  Global  Communications
Technology  Pty Ltd, an entity  wholly owned by Roger May, a former  officer and
director of the Company.

         Net cash used by  financing  activities  for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2002 of $118,530 resulted entirely from the payment of the Grassland Capital
Group loan  payable  and  accrued  interest  that was in  default  and which was
subject to a judgment against the Company.


                                       21
<PAGE>


EQUITY LINE OF CREDIT

         Pursuant to the Equity Line of Credit,  we may periodically sell shares
of common stock to Cornell Capital  Partners,  L.P. to raise capital to fund our
working  capital needs.  The periodic sale of shares is known as an advance.  We
may request an advance  every 5 trading  days.  A closing will be held 7 trading
days after such written  notice at which time we will  deliver  shares of common
stock and Cornell Capital Partners, L.P. will pay the advance amount.

         We may  request  advances  under the  Equity  Line of  Credit  once the
underlying  shares are registered  with the Securities and Exchange  Commission.
Thereafter,  we may continue to request  advances until Cornell Capital Partners
has  advanced  $30.0  million  or two  years  after  the  effective  date of the
accompanying registration statement, whichever occurs first.

         The amount of each advance is subject to an aggregate  maximum  advance
amount of $2 million in any thirty-day period. Cornell Capital will purchase the
shares of common  stock for a 9%  discount  to the  market  price of our  common
stock.  The amount available under the Equity Line of Credit is not dependent on
the price or volume of our common stock. Cornell Capital Partners will retain 3%
of the advance amount as a commitment  fee, which means that we will receive 97%
of the  advance  amount.  This means that  Cornell  will pay 88.0% of the market
price of our  common  stock  (i.e.  91% less 3%).  There is no floor  price that
Cornell  Capital  Partners  must  pay for an  advance.  Accordingly,  we will be
required to issue a greater number of shares to Cornell Capital  partners as our
price declines.

         There is an inverse relationship between our stock price and the number
of shares to be issued  under the Equity  Line of Credit.  That is, as our stock
price  declines,  we would be required to issue a greater number of shares under
the Equity Line of Credit for a given  advance.  This  inverse  relationship  is
demonstrated  by the  following  table,  which  shows the number of shares to be
issued  under the Equity Line of Credit at a recent price of $0.01 per share and
25%, 50% and 75%  discounts  to the recent  price.  As such,  the table has been
prepared to show the effect of issuing the 70,000,000 shares. As noted below, we
do  not  have  any  authorized  stock  to  issue.  As a  result,  we  will  need
shareholders'  approval to increase our authorized common stock before receiving
any funds under the Equity Line.

      Purchase Price:          $0.0025       $0.0050      $0.0075          $0.01


      No. of Shares(1):     70,000,000    70,000,000   70,000,000     70,000,000


      Total
      Outstanding(2):      188,852,622   188,852,622  188,852,622    188,852,622

      Percent
      Outstanding(3):            37.1%         37.1%        37.1%          37.1%

      Maximum Proceeds(4):    $175,000      $350,000     $525,000       $700,000


----------------------

(1)  Represents  the maximum  number of shares of common stock being  registered
     under the Equity Line of Credit.

(2)  Represents  the total  number of shares of common stock  outstanding  as of
     November  15,  2002,  plus the  shares  to be  issued  to  Cornell  Capital
     Partners, L.P. under the Equity Line of Credit.

(3)  Represents  the shares of common stock to be issued as a percentage  of the
     total number shares outstanding.

(4)  Represents  the maximum  proceeds  to be received  under the Equity Line of
     Credit for the prices and number of shares set forth in the table.

         We expect to incur expenses of approximately $85,000 in connection with
registering the Equity Line of Credit with  Securities and Exchange  Commission,
consisting primarily of professional fees. In addition, Cornell Capital Partners
will retain 3% of each advance. In connection with the Equity Line of Credit, we
paid Cornell  Capital  Partners a commitment fee of $740,000,  which was paid by
the issuance of 2,960,000  shares of common  stock.  The number of shares issued
for the  commitment  fee was equal to $0.25 per share.  In  addition,  we issued
40,000 shares of common stock, valued at $10,000, to Westrock Advisors,  Inc., a
registered broker-dealer, as a placement agent fee.


                                       22
<PAGE>


         As of February 25, 2003,  substantially all of our authorized shares of
common stock were outstanding.  As a result, we do not have any shares of common
stock  available  to issue  under the Equity  Line of Credit,  in other  capital
raising transactions or otherwise.  This means that we will not be able to raise
capital from the sale of common  stock,  whether under the Equity Line of Credit
or otherwise, unless the majority of our outstanding shares of common stock vote
to  approve  an  increase  to the  number of shares of common  stock that we are
authorized to issue. We plan to seek approval from our  shareholders to increase
our  authorized  common  stock,  although no  assurances  can be given that such
approval will be obtained. Our failure to obtain such approval will mean that we
will not be able to raise  capital  under the Equity  Line of Credit or from the
sale of our stock. In addition,  we do not anticipate being able to obtain loans
given our financial position. We will not be able to re-commence  operations and
may be forced to liquidate if we are unable to obtain such shareholder approval.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

         WE DO NOT HAVE A PRODUCT  TO SELL,  WHICH  MEANS  THAT WE DO NOT HAVE A
         PRODUCT TO SELL IN ORDER TO TRY TO ATTAIN PROFITABLE OPERATIONS

         The SpectruCell  product is in development and our rights to market and
distribute the product, if developed, are uncertain. As a result, we do not have
a product to sell in order to attain profitable operations.

         THE CONVERSION OF OUR OUTSTANDING DEBENTURES WILL CAUSE DILUTION TO OUR
         EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS,  WHICH MEANS THAT OUR PER-SHARE INCOME AND STOCK
         PRICE COULD DECLINE

         The  issuance  of  shares  upon  the  conversion  of  the   outstanding
debentures  will have a dilutive impact on our  stockholders.  We currently have
$1,250,000 of outstanding  convertible  debentures.  Of that total,  $250,000 of
convertible  debentures  is  convertible  at a fixed  price of $0.001 per share,
which would upon  conversion  result in the  issuance of  250,000,000  shares of
common  stock.   The  balance  of  $1,000,000  of  convertible   debentures  are
convertible  into shares of common stock at a price equal to equal to either (a)
an amount equal to one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the closing bid price of
the common stock as of the closing date or $0.40, whichever is higher, or (b) an
amount  equal to eighty  percent  (80%) of the lowest  closing  bid price of the
common stock for the five  trading days  immediately  preceding  the  conversion
date. If such  conversion  had taken place at $0.0072  (i.e.,  80% of the recent
price of $0.009),  then the  holders of the  convertible  debentures  would have
received  138,888,889  shares of common stock.  As a result,  our net income per
share could  decrease,  in future  periods,  and the market  price of our common
stock could decline.

         THE CONVERSION OF OUR  OUTSTANDING  DEBENTURES  COULD CAUSE A CHANGE OF
         CONTROL

         The  issuance  of  shares  upon  the  conversion  of  the   outstanding
debentures  could result in a change of control.  Cornell Capital Partners holds
convertible  debentures,  which if  converted  would  result in the  issuance of
250,000,000 shares of our common stock.  Currently, we are authorized to issue a
maximum of  200,000,000  shares of common stock.  Accordingly,  we do not have a
sufficient number of shares of common stock to honor all such conversions. If we
increased  the number of shares that we are  authorized  to issue,  then Cornell
would receive common stock  representing 65% of our outstanding  shares. In such
event, Cornell Capital would be our largest shareholder and would likely be able
to exercise control of our company by electing directors,  increasing the number
of authorized shares of common stock that our company could issue or otherwise.

         TERMINATION OF THE INTERIM LICENSE AGREEMENT

         In early October 2002, Advanced  Communications  (Australia) terminated
an interim  License  Agreement  we  entered  into with  Advanced  Communications
(Australia)  in July 2000 to facilitate  implementation  of our rights to market
and  distribute  SpectruCell  on the  grounds  that  we were  insolvent  and our
insolvency  constituted an irreparable  breach of the interim License Agreement.
Our initial response to the termination of the interim License  Agreement was to
oppose it and seek leave of the  Australian  Court to apply for an injunction to
prohibit  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  from acting on the  termination
pending trial.  The Australian  Court granted us leave to do so. However,  after
considering the situation  further and receiving advice of counsel,  we made the
strategic  decision  to alter our  approach  and  withdraw  from the  Australian
litigation.

         On October 25, 2002, we withdrew from the Australian litigation against
Mr. May and Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  The effect of the  Company's
decision  to  withdraw  from the  Australia  litigation  was  that the  existing
injunctions  issued by the Australia  Court have been lifted and the termination
of the interim License Agreement is not being challenged in the Australia Court.


                                       23
<PAGE>


         Notwithstanding our withdrawal from the Australia litigation,  we still
retain ownership of the rights to market and distribute  SpectruCell and related
technology acquired in the 1999 merger with Advanced Communications Technologies
(Nevada),  which were neither created by nor subject to  cancellation  under the
interim License Agreement.

         OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH MR. MAY AND ADVANCED  COMMUNICATIONS  (AUSTRALIA)
         IS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPAIRED


         Given all of the litigation by the Company against Mr. May and Advanced
Communications  (Australia) over our rights to market and distribute SpectruCell
and the Company's 20% stock interest in Advanced Communications  (Australia), it
is  likely  that  the  Company  will  continue  to be  involved  in  substantive
litigation  against  Mr. May and other  parties  to  protect  its rights to, and
interest  in,  the  SpectruCell  technology  for the North  and  South  American
markets.


         Even  if  we  are  able  to  prevail   against  Mr.  May  and  Advanced
Communications  (Australia) or its successor in interest as to  SpectruCell,  or
settle  our  disputes  with  those  parties  which  is  unlikely  under  current
conditions,  the success of the SpectruCell  project and our financial viability
on this basis is subject to many other risks and contingencies,  including,  but
not limited to, the ones mentioned below.

         WE HAVE HISTORICALLY LOST MONEY AND LOSSES MAY CONTINUE IN THE FUTURE

         We have  historically  lost money.  In the fiscal  years ended June 30,
2002 and 2001, we had a net loss of ($4,332,693) and ($19,732,566) or ($.04) and
($0.22) per share, respectively. Future losses are likely to occur. Accordingly,
we may  experience  significant  liquidity  and cash flow  problems  because our
operations  are not  profitable.  No  assurances  can be  given  that we will be
successful in reaching or maintaining profitable operations.

         WE WILL NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL TO FINANCE OPERATIONS

         We  have  relied  on  significant   external   financing  to  fund  our
operations.   Such  financing  has  historically  come  from  a  combination  of
borrowings  and sale of common  stock from third  parties and funds  provided by
certain officers and directors. We cannot assure you that financing whether from
external  sources or related parties will be available if needed or on favorable
terms.  Our inability to obtain  adequate  financing has resulted in the Company
curtailing its business  operations by relocating its office and terminating all
of its  consultants.  Any of these  events  would be  materially  harmful to our
business and may result in a lower stock price. We will need to raise additional
capital to fund our anticipated  operating expenses and future expansion.  Among
other things,  external financing will be required to cover our operating costs.
Unless the company is able to access its Equity Line of Credit  Facility  within
the near future or seek other sources of capital,  management  will be unable to
continue  operating the company.  To date,  the Company has been unable to raise
any external capital and its only source of capital is its Equity Line of Credit
facility,  which cannot be accessed until a registration  statement  registering
the  shares  to be  issued  to  Cornell  Capital  is  effective.  We  also  need
shareholders'  approval to increase our  authorized  stock in order to issue the
shares required for advances under the equity line.

         OUR  INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS  HAVE ADDED A GOING  CONCERN  OPINION TO OUR
         FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS,  WHICH MEANS THAT WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CONTINUE
         OPERATIONS UNLESS WE OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FUNDING

         Our independent  auditors have added an explanatory  paragraph to their
audit  opinions  issued in  connection  with the years  2002 and 2001  financial
statements, which states that our ability to continue as a going concern depends
upon our  ability  to  resolve  liquidity  problems,  principally  by  obtaining
capital,   commencing  sales  and  generating   sufficient  revenues  to  become
profitable.  Our ability to obtain additional funding will determine our ability
to continue as a going  concern.  Our  financial  statements  do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

         WE HAVE A WORKING CAPITAL DEFICIT,  WHICH MEANS THAT OUR CURRENT ASSETS
         ON JUNE 30, 2002 WERE NOT SUFFICIENT TO SATISFY OUR CURRENT LIABILITIES
         ON THAT DATE

         We had a working  capital  deficit of  $3,252,643  as of June 30, 2002,
which  means  that our  current  liabilities  exceeded  our  current  assets  by
$3,252,643.  Current  assets are assets that are expected to be  converted  into
cash within one year and,  therefore,  may be used to pay current liabilities as
they become due. Our working  capital  deficit means that our current  assets on
June 30, 2002 were not  sufficient to satisfy all of our current  liabilities on
that date.


                                       24
<PAGE>


         THE PRICE OF OUR  COMMON  STOCK MAY BE  AFFECTED  BY A LIMITED  TRADING
         VOLUME AND MAY FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY

         Prior to this offering  there has been a limited  public market for our
common stock and there can be no assurance  that an active  trading  market will
develop.  An absence of an active  trading  market  could  adversely  affect our
stockholders'  ability  to sell  our  common  stock in short  time  periods,  or
possibly at all. Our common stock has  experienced,  and is likely to experience
in the future,  significant  price and volume  fluctuations that could adversely
affect the market  price of our common  stock  without  regard to our  operating
performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations
in our financial  results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of
the  financial  markets  could cause the price of our common  stock to fluctuate
substantially.

         OUR COMMON STOCK IS DEEMED TO BE "PENNY  STOCK," WHICH MAY MAKE IT MORE
         DIFFICULT  FOR  INVESTORS  TO  SELL  THEIR  SHARES  DUE TO  SUITABILITY
         REQUIREMENTS

         Our common stock is deemed to be "penny  stock" as that term is defined
in Rule 3a51-1  promulgated  under the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934.  These
requirements  may reduce the  potential  market for our common stock by reducing
the number of potential investors. This may make it more difficult for investors
in our common stock to sell shares to third  parties or to otherwise  dispose of
them. This could cause our stock price to decline. Penny stocks are stock:

         o     With a price of less than $5.00 per share;

         o     That are not traded on a "recognized" national exchange;

         o     Whose  prices are not quoted on the  Nasdaq  automated  quotation
               system  (Nasdaq  listed stock must still have a price of not less
               than $5.00 per share); or

         o     In issuers  with net  tangible  assets less than $2.0 million (if
               the issuer has been in  continuous  operation  for at least three
               years) or $5.0 million (if in continuous  operation for less than
               three years),  or with average revenues of less than $6.0 million
               for the last three years.

         Broker/dealers   dealing  in  penny  stocks  are  required  to  provide
potential  investors  with a  document  disclosing  the  risks of penny  stocks.
Moreover,  broker/dealers  are required to determine  whether an investment in a
penny stock is a suitable investment for a prospective investor.

         WE COULD FAIL TO ATTRACT OR RETAIN KEY PERSONNEL

         Our  success  largely  depends  on the  efforts  and  abilities  of key
executives  and  consultants,  including  Wayne Danson,  our President and Chief
Financial Officer.  The loss of the services of Mr. Danson could materially harm
our  business  because of the cost and time  necessary  to  replace  and train a
replacement.  Such a loss  would  also  divert  management  attention  away from
operational issues. We do not presently maintain a key-man life insurance policy
on Mr. Danson.

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

         The  financial  statements  required by item 7 are included in the Form
10-KSB beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL REPORTING

         None.


                                       25
<PAGE>


                                    PART III

ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

         The  following  table  sets  forth the  names  and ages of our  current
directors and executive officers,  their principal offices and positions and the
date each such person  became a director or  executive  officer.  Our  executive
officers are elected  annually by the Board of Directors.  Our  directors  serve
one-year terms until their successors are elected.  The executive officers serve
terms of one year or until their death,  resignation  or removal by the Board of
Directors.  There are no family  relationships or understandings  between any of
the directors and executive officers.  In addition,  there was no arrangement or
understanding  between any  executive  officer and any other person  pursuant to
which any person was selected as an executive officer.

         Our directors and officers are as follows:

       NAME AND ADDRESS               AGE    POSITION
       ---------------------------  -------  -----------------------------------

       Wayne I. Danson                49     President, Chief Financial Officer
       420 Lexington Ave.                    and Director
       New York, NY 10170

       Dr. Michael Finch              54     Director
       37 Walnut Street
       Wellesley, MA 02481

       Jonathan J. Lichtman           50     Director
       4800 N. Federal Hwy
       Boca Raton, FL 33431

       Randall Prouty                 50     Chairman of the Board of Directors
       420 Lexington Avenue                  and Director
       New York, NY 10170

       Wilbank J. Roche               56     Director
       2530 Wilshire Blvd.
       Santa Monica, CA 90403

         The directors  named above will serve until the next annual  meeting of
our  shareholders  or until their  successors  shall be elected and accept their
positions.  Mr. Danson is party to a written consulting  agreement that entitled
him to  $20,000  per month in cash and stock for the  period  September  1, 2000
through August 31, 2001 and, as extended orally, to December 31, 2001. Effective
January 1, 2002,  Mr. Danson agreed to orally  extend his  consulting  agreement
with  Advanced  Communications  through  December  31, 2003 at a monthly rate of
$12,500. Mr. Danson is reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses relating
to their activities for Advanced Communications.

         Our directors do not receive any cash  compensation  for their services
as a  director,  but are  reimbursed  for all of  their  out-of-pocket  expenses
incurred in  connection  with the  rendering  of  services  as a  director.  The
directors are  compensated  through the grant and issuance of 100,000  shares of
restricted  common  shares for each of the fiscal  years  ended 2002 and 2001 in
which  they have  served  as  directors.  The value of the stock  issued to each
director on January 22, 2002 was $36,000.

         WAYNE I. DANSON,  PRESIDENT,  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND DIRECTOR. Mr.
Danson has served as our company's  Chief  Financial  Officer since  December 1,
1999,  was appointed a Director on January 3, 2000,  and appointed  President on
April 30,  2002.  Mr.  Danson is the  Managing  Director  and  Founder of Danson
Partners, LLC, a financial advisory firm specializing in middle market companies
in the real estate and technology industries.  Prior to forming Danson Partners,
LLC  in  May  1999,  Mr.  Danson  was  co-head  of  and  Managing   Director  of
PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP's  Real  Estate  Capital  Markets  Group.  Prior  to
rejoining  PricewaterhouseCoopers in 1996, Mr. Danson was a Managing Tax Partner
with Kenneth  Leventhal & Company in New York and Washington  D.C., where he was
also  Kenneth  Leventhal's  National  Director  of its  International  and  Debt
Restructure Tax Practices.  Prior to his involvement  with Kenneth  Leventhal in
1988,  Mr.  Danson was a Managing  Director  with Wolper Ross & Co., Ltd. in New


                                       26
<PAGE>


York, a closely held financial  services company  specializing in financial tax,
pension  consulting,  designing  financial  instruments  and  providing  venture
capital and investment  banking services.  Mr. Danson graduated with honors from
Bernard M. Baruch College with a BBA in Accounting and an MBA in Taxation. He is
a certified  public  accountant and a member of the AICPA and the New York State
Society of CPAs.

         Mr.  Danson is a  consultant  to the Company  who spends  approximately
20-30 hours, on average, per week on Company matters.

         JONATHAN  J.  LICHTMAN,   SECRETARY  AND  DIRECTOR.  Mr.  Lichtman  was
appointed a Director on  November  9, 1999 and is  currently a partner  with the
Boca  Raton law firm of  Levinson  &  Lichtman,  LLP,  where he  specializes  in
structuring  corporate  and  partnership  transactions,  including  real  estate
syndications.  Mr.  Lichtman is also currently a general partner of several real
estate  partnerships in New York,  North Carolina and Florida.  Prior to forming
Levinson and Lichtman LLP, Mr. Lichtman was an attorney with English,  McCaughan
and O'Bryan,  PA, where he performed  legal work for domestic and  international
clients,  as well as real estate  partnerships  and  development.  Mr.  Lichtman
obtained his J.D. degree, cum laude, from Syracuse University College of Law and
his LLM degree in taxation  from the  University  of Miami  School of Law. He is
also a certified  public  accountant  and is licensed to practice law in Florida
and New York.

         DR.  MICHAEL  FINCH,  DIRECTOR.  Dr. Finch was  appointed a Director on
March 10, 1997 and since 1998,  has been Chief  Technology  Officer of New Media
Solutions,  responsible for the conception,  planning,  creation,  execution and
deployment  of all  software  products and  projects.  For the four years before
that,  he was employed by Media Forum (first in the UK, and then in the U.S.) as
Director  of  Product  Development.   He  was  responsible  for  developing  and
implementing  Media  Forum's  software   capabilities  and  strategy,   managing
technical  and complex  software  projects for high-end  clients,  and pre-sales
demonstrations  to clients of Media Forum's software stance and expertise.  From
1983 to 1993, Dr. Finch was a Financial Software Engineer,  who designed,  wrote
and implemented  sophisticated real-time computer programs for trading Financial
Instruments and Commodities on the Chicago and New York Futures exchanges. Prior
to 1983, Dr. Finch was a research scientist and mathematician,  with an academic
career at four UK universities. He obtained a Doctorate of Mathematics at Sussex
University for original  research into Einstein's  Theory of General  Relativity
and its application to Neutron Stars. He lectured at Queen Mary's College London
on advanced mathematics.

         RANDALL  PROUTY,  CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND  DIRECTOR.  Mr.  Prouty,  a
co-founder and Director since March 10, 1997, is currently the President and CEO
of World Associates,  Inc., a publicly traded  development stage company.  He is
also the sole owner of Bristol  Capital,  Inc., a firm active in consulting  and
business  development work for companies seeking access to capital markets,  and
through  which he is  incubating  other  e-business  ventures.  Mr.  Prouty is a
licensed real estate and mortgage broker in the State of Florida.  His technical
background includes being a qualified  Webmaster and developing  e-businesses on
the web.

         WILBANK J. ROCHE, DIRECTOR. Mr. Roche was appointed a Director on March
25, 1999 and is currently a principal with the law firm of Roche & Holt in Santa
Monica,  California.  Mr. Roche was an honors  graduate  from the  University of
California  in  1976,  as well as from  Loyola  University  School  of Law,  Los
Angeles,  in 1979. He was admitted to the  California  State Bar in 1979 and has
been  practicing law actively since that time. Mr. Roche worked for law firms in
the Los Angeles area from 1976 to 1983, when he opened his own office.  In 1985,
he formed Roche & Holt.  Mr.  Roche's law practice has revolved  largely  around
representing  small businesses and their owners. In that regard, he has provided
legal services in connection with the formation, purchase, sale, and dissolution
of numerous entities,  as well as in connection with their on-going  operations.
In the past several  years,  he has devoted  substantial  time to clients in the
telecommunications business.

RESIGNATIONS

         Effective  November  30, 2001,  Mr. May was removed as Chief  Executive
Officer, President and Chairman of the Board. The Board of Directors removed Mr.
May because it had become dissatisfied with Advanced  Communications'  direction
under Mr. May's leadership. Mr. Prouty assumed the role of Chairman of the Board
effective  November 30, 2001 and Mr. Gary Ivaska was appointed  President of the
Company. Effective March 14, 2002, Roger May and Allen Roberts resigned from the
Board of  Directors.  Neither Mr. May nor Mr.  Roberts were replaced on Advanced
Communications'  Board of  Directors.  Effective  April  30,  2002,  Mr.  Ivaska
resigned as our President.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

         In a board meeting held on May 15 2001, both an audit and  compensation
committee  was  established.  The  audit  committee  will  report  to the  board
regarding the appointment of our independent public  accountants,  the scope and
results of our annual  audits,  compliance  with our  accounting  and  financial


                                       27
<PAGE>


policies and  management's  procedures and policies  relative to the adequacy of
our internal  accounting  controls.  The audit committee is comprised of Messrs.
Prouty and Finch.  The  compensation  committee of the board of  directors  will
review and make recommendations to the board regarding our compensation policies
and all forms of  compensation  to be provided  to our  executive  officers.  In
addition,  the compensation  committee will review bonus and stock  compensation
arrangements  for all of our other  employees.  The  compensation  committee  is
comprised of Messrs. Roche and Prouty.

         The Board of Directors also  established an Acquisitions  Committee and
an  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  Committee.  Messrs.  Prouty,  Danson,
Lichtman and Roche  currently  serve on the  Acquisitions  Committee and Messrs.
Prouty,  Danson,  Lichtman,  Roche and Finch serve on the  Australian  Affiliate
Committee,  which will address and make all decisions relating to the activities
of our Australian Affiliate and SpectruCell.

ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

         The following table shows all cash compensation  accrued and/or paid by
Advanced Communications,  as well as certain other compensation paid or accrued,
for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000. Other than as set forth
herein, no executive  officer's cash salary and bonus exceeded $50,000 in any of
the applicable  years.  The following  information  includes the dollar value of
base salaries,  bonus awards,  the value of restricted  shares issued in lieu of
cash  compensation  and certain  other  compensation,  if any,  whether  paid or
deferred.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        ANNUAL COMPENSATION                     LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    AWARDS         PAYOUTS
                                                                             -----------------------------
                                                                 OTHER       RESTRICTED
                                                                 ANNUAL        STOCK      OPTIONS/    LTIP     ALL OTHER
                                   SALARY        BONUS       COMPENSATION     AWARD(S)      SARS    PAYOUTS  COMPENSATION
NAME AND                         ------------  ----------   --------------   -----------  --------  -------  ------------
PRINCIPAL POSITION        YEAR       ($)          ($)             ($)            ($)         (#)      ($)         ($)
---------------------    ------  ------------  ----------   --------------   -----------  --------  -------  ------------
<S>                       <C>    <C>           <C>                 <C>       <C>             <C>      <C>           <C>
Wayne I. Danson,          2002   $149,933(1)                                 $110,000 (1)
President and CFO         2001   $235,931(2)           --          --        $167,500 (2)    --       --            --
                          2000   $ 50,000(3)           --          --        $223,400 (4)    --       --            --

Roger May, CEO            2002   $ 87,500(5)
                          2001   $197,500(5)   $50,000 (5)         --                  --    --       --            --
                          2000   $120,000(5)            --         --                  --    --       --            --


(1)      Represents  accrued  fees and  out-of-pocket  expenses.  Mr.  Danson  received  $65,000 in cash for fiscal 2002
         services and $32,775 for reimbursement of prior and current  out-of-pocket  expenses.  Mr. Danson was appointed
         President on April 30, 2002.

(2)      Represents the value of accrued fees and stock-based  compensation  earned by Mr. Danson during the fiscal year
         ended June 30, 2001.  Stock-based  compensation  amounted to $167,500. Of accrued consulting fees earned in the
         amount  of  $235,931,  only  $23,105  was paid in cash to Mr.  Danson.  The  balance  of Mr.  Danson's  accrued
         compensation remains unpaid as of June 30, 2001. In August 2001, Mr. Danson agreed to receive 500,000 shares of
         our restricted common stock in lieu of $150,000 of unpaid consulting fees.

(3)      Mr.  Danson  became  Chief  Financial  Officer of Advanced  Communications  on December 1, 1999 and such amount
         reflects the cash compensation  (exclusive of reimbursement of expenses) paid to him during the period December
         1, 1999 to June 30, 2000.

(4)      Mr. Danson also received 100,000 shares of our stock as a signing bonus in December 1999 and June 2000.  During
         this time, the shares were trading  between $1.50 - $3.50 per share.

(5)      Accrued and unpaid  compensation.  No cash was received by Mr. May during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2000,
         June 30, 2001 and 2002.  Mr. May's  compensation  for fiscal 2001  includes a $50,000 cash bonus which  remains
         unpaid as of June 30, 2001. Mr. May left Advanced  Communications  on November 30, 2001. On March 26, 2002, the
         Board of Directors  unanimously  approved the recommendation of the Compensation  Committee to reduce Mr. May's
         current and prior  accrued  compensation  by $394,361  representing  services  Mr. May  performed  for Advanced
         Communications (Australia).
</TABLE>

         Advanced  Communications has no deferred  compensation,  stock options,
SAR or other bonus  arrangements for its employees and/or directors.  During the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, all decisions concerning executive compensation
were  made  by the  Board  of  Directors  and  effective  May  15,  2001  by our
compensation committee.

EMPLOYMENT AND CONSULTING AGREEMENTS

         On November 29,  1999,  we entered  into a  consulting  agreement  with
Danson Partners,  LLC to provide the functions  customarily  provided by a Chief
Financial Officer. As compensation for these services, we paid $5,000 monthly in
advance, plus 100,000 restricted shares of common stock. Starting April 1, 2000,
compensation for these services  increased to $10,000 per month. On September 1,
2000,  we entered  into  another  one-year  consulting  agreement  with Wayne I.
Danson,  the Chief Financial  Officer. A signing bonus of 75,000 shares of stock


                                       28
<PAGE>


was issued,  valued at $67,500.  This contract  expired August 31, 2001, but was
orally  extended to December 31, 2001.  As  compensation,  Mr.  Danson  receives
$10,000 per month in cash and $10,000 per month in stock.  Effective  January 1,
2002,   Mr.   Danson   agreed  to  orally  extend  his  contract  with  Advanced
Communications through December 31, 2003, at a monthly rate of $12,500.

         Effective July 1, 2000, Advanced Communications and Mr. May, our former
Chief Executive Officer, entered into an oral employment agreement that entitled
Mr. May to receive $15,000 per month and a bonus of $50,000.  Effective December
1, 2000, Mr. May's compensation  increased to $17,500 per month. On November 30,
2001,  Mr.  May was  terminated  as  Advanced  Communications'  Chief  Executive
Officer.  The  Compensation  Committee  of the Board of  Directors  reviewed the
nature and extent of Mr.  May's past  services  to  Advanced  Communications  to
determine how much of Mr. May's prior  services are more  properly  allocable to
Advanced Communications  (Australia). At Advanced Communications' March 26, 2002
Board of Director's  meeting,  the Board of Directors  unanimously  approved the
recommendation  of the Compensation  Committee to reduce Mr. May's prior accrued
compensation  by $394,361  representing  services Mr. May performed for Advanced
Communications (Australia), leaving a balance of $172,183 at June 30, 2002.

         On November 30, 2001, we entered into an oral employment agreement with
Mr.  Gary  Ivaska to serve as our  President  at a rate of  $120,000  per annum.
Effective April 30, 2002, Mr. Gary Ivaska  resigned as Advanced  Communications'
President.

ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

         The following table contains information about the beneficial ownership
of our common stock as of September 15, 2002 for:

         o each  person  who  beneficially  owns more than five  percent  of the
           common stock;

         o each of our directors;

         o the named executive officers; and

         o all directors and executive officers as a group.

         Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each person or entity named
below is c/o Advanced Communications  Technologies,  Inc., 420 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10170.

         Beneficial  ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
Securities and Exchange  Commission and generally  includes voting or investment
power with respect to securities.  Except as indicated by footnote,  and subject
to community  property  laws where  applicable,  the persons  named in the table
below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common
stock  shown as  beneficially  owned  by  them.  The  percentage  of  beneficial
ownership  is based on  118,852,622  shares of common  stock  outstanding  as of
November 15, 2002.


                                       29
<PAGE>


                                                       COMMON STOCK
                                                    BENEFICIALLY OWNED
                                          --------------------------------------
NAME/ADDRESS                                     NUMBER               PERCENT(1)
---------------------------------------   -------------------   ----------------
Advanced Communications (Australia)         10,000,000(6)             8.41%
Roger May                                   18,228,000(1)            15.33%
Nancy Needham                                7,168,454(2)             6.03%
E.R. DuPont                                  2,751,335(3)             2.31%
Wayne Danson                                 2,811,214(4)             2.37%
Jonathan J. Lichtman                         2,710,334(5)             2.28%
Dr. Michael Finch                                 591,334                 *
Randall Prouty                                  2,218,056             1.87%
Wilbank J. Roche                                  650,000                 *
                                            -------------          --------
All Officers and Directors as a Group           8,980,938             7.56%

------------------------------------

(1)      No shares are owned directly by Mr. May. All shares  beneficially owned
         by Mr. May are owned through either Global Communications Technologies,
         Pty Ltd., or Advanced  Communications  (Australia),  which entities are
         controlled by Mr. May.

(2)      Excludes  4,790,347  shares held by Dr.  Needham's adult children.  Dr.
         Needham has no  beneficial  ownership  in these  shares.  (3)  Excludes
         3,449,048  shares held by Mr.  DuPont's adult children and in trust for
         Rhett DuPont, a minor. Mr. DuPont has no
         beneficial ownership in these shares.

(3)      Excludes  3,449,048  shares held by Mr.  DuPont's adult children and in
         trust for Rhett DuPont, a minor, Mr. DuPont has no beneficial ownership
         in these shares.

(4)      Includes 2,461,214 shares owned beneficially by Mr. Danson's affiliated
         entity and children.

(5)      Excludes 396,666  shares  beneficially  owned  through  various  family
         trusts.  Mr. Lichtman has no beneficial  ownership in these shares.

(6)      At the time of the  original  filing  of the Form  10-KSB  for the year
         ended June 30, 2002, Advanced Communications (Australia) was controlled
         by Mr. May. As a result,  Mr. May is deemed to be the beneficial  owner
         of these shares.

*        Less than 1%.

ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION

         Effective  April  30,  2002,  Mr.  Gary  Ivaska  resigned  as  Advanced
Communications' Chief Executive Officer.  Advanced Communications and Mr. Ivaska
have settled all outstanding  amounts  otherwise due him for his prior services.
Under the terms of the Ivaska Agreement, Advanced Communications is obligated to
pay Mr.  Ivaska  $40,000  at the rate of  $10,000  per  month  for  four  months
commencing on May 31, 2002. No payments have been made to Mr. Ivaska.

         During the fiscal  year ended June 30,  2002,  Advanced  Communications
issued 200,000  shares of its restricted  common stock having a value of $36,000
to  each of its  five  current  directors  for  services  rendered  to  Advanced
Communications as directors. Advanced Communications issued a total of 1,000,000
shares in the aggregate  having a value of $180,000.  The stock was valued based
on the quoted trading price of Advanced  Communications'  stock on the date that
the shares were granted to the individual directors.

         At the  request of Advanced  Communications'  Board of  Directors,  the
Compensation  Committee  conducted  a review of the nature of the past  services
provided by Mr. May to Advanced Communications to determine whether a portion of
such   services  are  more   properly   allocable  to  Advanced   Communications
(Australia).  At Advanced  Communications'  March 26,  2002 Board of  Director's
meeting,  the Board of Directors  unanimously approved the recommendation of the
Compensation  Committee  to reduce  Mr.  May's  prior  accrued  compensation  by
$394,361  representing  services Mr. May performed  for Advanced  Communications
(Australia), leaving a balance of $172,183 at June 30, 2002.

         On January 10, 2002, the Company executed various financing  agreements
with  Cornell  Capital  Partners,  LP, a New  Jersey-based  hedge fund,  whereby
Cornell and certain other investors  purchased from Advanced  Communications  $1
million of two-year  Convertible  Debentures and Cornell  provided a $30 million
structured  equity facility.  Pursuant to the Convertible  Debenture  financing,
Advanced Communications received $564,000 net of financing and closing costs and
the  repayment  of the  $325,000  ninety-day  note.  Under  the terms of the $30
million  structured equity facility,  Advanced  Communications  has the right to
require  Cornell to make  monthly  purchases  of up to $2  million  of  Advanced
Communications'  stock on a discounted  basis.  Advanced  Communications  issued
2,960,000 shares of common stock with a market value of $740,000 as a commitment
fee as part of this transaction.

                                       30
<PAGE>

         On  January  15,  2002,  Advanced  Communications  moved its  corporate
headquarters from Irvine to El Segundo,  California.  The lease has a three-year
term commencing on January 1, 2002. As of August 1, 2002, the Company  relocated
its principal  executive  office from  California to 420 Lexington  Avenue,  New
York, NY 10170 within the office facility of Danson  Partners,  LLC, a privately
owned company that employs our President and Chief Financial Officer. No rent or
facility use fee is charged to the Company by Danson Partners, LLC.

         Through a family trust  established  in Australia,  Mr. May, an officer
and  director  of the  company  until  November  30,  2001 and  March  14,  2002
respectively and a principal  shareholder of our company,  indirectly owns a 70%
majority interest in Advanced Communications  (Australia). Up until November 11,
2002, we owned 20% of the common stock of Advanced  Communications  (Australia).
On November 11, 2002, Advanced  Communications  (Australia)'s issued a Notice of
Termination to the Company stating that the April 2000 Stock Purchase  Agreement
was  terminated   immediately   due  to  the  Company's   insolvency.   Advanced
Communications (Australia) filed for protection under Australia's insolvency law
on July 18, 2002 and  appointment an independent  administrator  and receiver to
manage and operate its business.

         As of June 30, 2002, Advanced Communications owed Global Communications
Technology  Pty Ltd, a  wholly-owned  entity of Roger May, a former  officer and
director of the  Company and a  significant  shareholder,  $1,055,736  for funds
advanced  to  Advanced  Communications  to provide  working  capital and for the
repayment  of  certain of  Advanced  Communications'  obligations.  This loan is
non-interest bearing and unsecured.  This loan does not have a scheduled date of
repayment.  Advanced Communications does not believe that the loans are due upon
demand.  However,  the actual repayment terms are not known with any specificity
since the terms are not contained in a written document.

         In April 2000, our company acquired 20% of the common stock of Advanced
Communications  (Australia).  The purchase price of the  investment  amounted to
$19,350,000, and was comprised of a note payable for $7,500,000 and the issuance
of 5,000,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $11,850,000. The shares
issued were valued at the average  quoted  trading price during the  acquisition
period. Our interest in Advanced  Communications  (Australia) was evidenced by a
Stock Purchase  agreement and was reflected by stock  ownership  records on file
with the Australian Securities Investment  Commission,  an Australian government
agency.  Through  June 30,  2002,  we repaid  $5,708,834  of our  obligation  to
Advanced Communications (Australia), in part by the issuance of 7,787,000 shares
of  restricted  common  stock having a value of  $4,884,101.  The balance of our
repayments  was in the form of cash.  As of June 30,  2002,  the  balance of our
obligation  to Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  was  $1,791,166.  Advanced
Communications  was  in  litigation  with  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)
regarding  the attempt by Mr. May to lien and transfer the  company's  shares in
the affiliate for alleged nonpayment of the company's  obligations as well as to
terminate our License and Distribution Agreement. On November 11, 2002, Advanced
Communications  (Australia)  issued a Notice of  Termination to the Company that
the April 2000 Stock  Purchase  Agreement is terminated  immediately  due to the
Company's  insolvency.  The Company's  position,  which is subject to opinion by
Australian counsel, is that as a result of Advanced Communications (Australia)'s
insolvency  proceeding  and its  unilateral  termination  of the Stock  Purchase
Agreement,  no  further  money  is owed  and that  the  Company  has no  further
obligation to Advanced Communications (Australia).

         On September 1, 2000,  Mr.  Danson  entered into a one-year  consulting
agreement  with our company for the period  September 1, 2000 through August 31,
2001. Under the terms of the consulting  agreement,  Mr. Danson received $10,000
per month in cash and $10,000 per month in stock for his services.  Mr. Danson's
agreement expired on August 31, 2001. Mr. Danson has agreed to orally extend his
consulting agreement with Advanced Communications through December 31, 2003 at a
monthly rate of $12,500.

         On December 13,  2001,  Advanced  Communications  entered into a 90-day
$325,000  Promissory  Note (the "Note") with Cornell Capital  Partners,  LP. The
Note had an  interest  rate of 12% and was  secured  by a  Guaranty  and  Pledge
Agreement  executed  by Mr.  Danson,  Mr.  Lichtman  and  Mr.  Prouty.  Advanced
Communications realized $269,000 of net proceeds after financing costs and legal
fees.  The Note was repaid on  January  14,  2002 with  proceeds  from  Advanced
Communications' $1 million Convertible Debenture.

         Jonathan  J.  Lichtman,  Assistant  Secretary  and a  director  of  the
Company, is a partner at Levinson & Lichtman,  LLP, a law firm in Boca Raton, FL
that the Company retained to provide legal services during the fiscal years 2002
and 2001.  The Company has paid Levinson & Lichtman,  LLP $43,184 and $90,000 in
the form of cash and stock  respectively,  for legal  services  rendered  during
fiscal 2002.  No cash was paid to Levinson & Lichtman,  LLP during  fiscal 2001.
During fiscal 2001, the Company issued  $186,000 of restricted  common stock for
legal services rendered.

         Wilbank Roche, a director of the Company, is a partner at Roche & Holt,
a law firm in Los  Angeles,  CA that  the  Company  retained  to  provide  legal
services  during the fiscal year 2002. The Company has paid Roche & Holt $13,515
and  $15,000 in the form of cash and  stock,  respectively,  for legal  services
rendered.

                                       31
<PAGE>

         Effective July 1, 2002, the Company entered into a six month consulting
agreement  with  Randall  Prouty,  Chairman  of the Board and a director  of the
Company,  pursuant to which Mr.  Prouty has agreed to provide  certain  business
services, such as dispute resolution,  corporate communications  strategies, and
business  acquisitions  to the Company.  Pursuant to the terms of the consulting
agreement,  Mr. Prouty will accrue $10,000 in monthly  compensation for services
provided to the Company. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, the Company
issued 1,100,000 shares of restricted  common stock having a value of $55,000 to
Mr. Prouty and $10,986 in cash  compensation for business  services  rendered to
the Company.

         Dr. Michael  Finch, a director of the Company,  has been issued 133,334
shares of restricted  common stock having a value of $10,000 for engineering and
software design consulting services rendered to the Company during fiscal 2002.

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

         (a)   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

               (i)   Registrant.

         (b)   EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K:

               (i)   Exhibits:

EXHIBIT NO.    DESCRIPTION                          LOCATION
-----------    -----------                          --------

1.1            Exchange Agreement between MRC       Incorporated by reference to
               Legal Services Corporation and       Exhibit  1.1  to   Company's
               Advanced Communications              Form  8-K  filed on February
               Technologies, Inc. dated as of       4, 2000
               January 31, 2000

2.1            Articles of Incorporation of Media   Incorporated by reference to
               Forum International, Inc.            Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's
                                                    Form S-8  filed on  February
                                                    9, 2000

2.2            Second Amendment to Articles of      Incorporated by reference to
               Incorporation of Telenetworx, Inc.   Exhibit 2.2 to the Company's
                                                    Form  S-8 filed  on February
                                                    9, 2000

2.3            Third Amendment to Articles of       Incorporated by reference to
               Incorporation of Media Forum         Exhibit 2.3 to the Company's
               International, Inc.                  Form S-8  filed on  February
                                                    9, 2000

2.4            Bylaws of the Company                Incorporated by reference to
                                                    Exhibit 2.4 to the Company's
                                                    Form  S-8 filed on  February
                                                    9, 2000

2.5            Articles of Incorporation as         Incorporated by reference to
               currently in effect for the          Exhibit  3.1   to   Form S-1
               Company                              Registration Statement filed
                                                    on August 14, 2001

2.6            Bylaws, as currently in effect       Incorporated by reference to
                                                    Exhibit   3.2  to  Form  S-1
                                                    Registration Statement filed
                                                    on August 14, 2001

2.7            Fourth Amendment to Articles of      Incorporated by reference to
               Incorporation                        Exhibit 2.7 to the Form SB-2
                                                    filed  with the SEC on March
                                                    5, 2002

10.1           Lease Agreement dated as of          Incorporated by reference to
               November 27, 2001 between the        Exhibit  10.1  to  the  Form
               Company and Continental              SB-2 filed with the  SEC  on
               Development, L. P. II                March 5, 2002

                                       32
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT NO.    DESCRIPTION                          LOCATION
-----------    -----------                          --------

10.2           Stock Purchase Agreement between     Incorporated by reference to
               Advanced Communications              Exhibit 10.2 to the Form S-1
               Technologies, Inc. and Advanced      Registration Statement filed
               Communications Technologies          on August 14, 2001
               (Australia) Pty Ltd.

10.3           Agreement dated June 27, 2000,       Incorporated by reference to
               between Ladenburg Thalmann & Co.     Exhibit   10.3   to      the
               and the Company                      Company's     Form       S-1
                                                    Registration Statement filed
                                                    on August 14, 2001

10.4           Common Stock Purchase Agreement      Incorporated by reference to
               dated December 14, 2000, between     Exhibit     10.4    to   the
               the Company and Wanquay Ltd.         Company's      Form      S-1
                                                    Registration Statement filed
                                                    on August 14, 2001

10.5           Registration Rights Agreement        Incorporated by reference to
               dated December 14, 2000, between     Exhibit     10.5    to   the
               the Company and Wanquay Ltd.         Company's      Form      S-1
                                                    Registration Statement filed
                                                    on August 14, 2001

10.6           Escrow Agreement dated December      Incorporated by reference to
               14, 2000, among the Company,         Exhibit      10.6    to  the
               Wanquay Ltd. and Epstein Becker &    Company's     Form       S-1
               Green                                Registration Statement filed
                                                    on August 14, 2001

10.7           Consulting Agreement with M.         Incorporated by reference to
               Richard Cutler dated January 31,     Exhibit       10.1   to  the
               2000                                 Company's Form S-8 filed  on
                                                    February 9, 2000

10.8           Stock Purchase Agreement dated       Incorporated by reference to
               April 5, 2000, between Advanced      Exhibit       10.5  to   the
               Communications Technologies, Inc.    Company's Form 10-QSB  filed
               and Advanced Communications          on May 24, 2000
               Technologies Pty Ltd.

10.9           Securities Purchase Agreement        Incorporated  by  referenced
               dated January 10, 2002, by and       to   Exhibit   10.9  to  the
               among Advanced Communications        Company's Form 10-QSB filed
               Technologies, Inc. and Buyers        on February 12, 2002

10.10          Investor Registration Rights         Incorporated by reference to
               Agreement dated January 10, 2002,    Exhibit    10.10    to   the
               by and among Advanced                Company's Form  10-QSB filed
               Communications Technologies, Inc.    on February 12, 2002
               and Investors

10.11          Transfer Agent Instructions          Incorporated by reference to
                                                    Exhibit   10.11    to    the
                                                    Company's  Form 10-QSB filed
                                                    on February 12, 2002

10.12          Escrow Agreement dated January 10,   Incorporated by reference to
               2002, by and among Advanced          Exhibit    10.12   to    the
               Communications Technologies, Inc.,   Company's Form 10-QSB  filed
               Buyers and First Union National      on February 12, 2002
               Bank

10.13          Equity Line of Credit Agreement      Incorporated by reference to
               dated January 10, 2002, by and       Exhibit   10.13   to     the
               between Cornell Capital Partners,    Company's Form 10-QSB  filed
               LP and Advanced Communications       on February 12, 2002
               Technologies, Inc.

10.14          Registration Rights Agreement        Incorporated by reference to
               dated January 10, 2002, by and       Exhibit   10.14    to    the
               between Advanced Communications      Company's Form 10-QSB  filed
               Technologies, Inc.                   on February 12, 2002

10.15          Placement Agent Agreement dated      Incorporated by reference to
               January 10, 2002, by and between     Exhibit    10.15    to   the
               Advanced Communications              Company's Form 10-QSB  filed
               Technologies, Inc. and Westrock      on February 12, 2002
               Advisors, Inc.

                                       33
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT NO.    DESCRIPTION                          LOCATION
-----------    -----------                          --------

10.16          Escrow Agreement dated January 10,   Incorporated by reference to
               2002, by and among Advanced          Exhibit   10.16    to    the
               Communications Technologies, Inc.,   Company's  Form 10-QSB filed
               Cornell Capital Partners, LP,        on February 12, 2002
               Butler Gonzalez LLP and First
               Union National Bank

10.17          License and Distribution Agreement   Incorporated by reference to
               dated as of July 5, 2000, between    Exhibit   10.17     to   the
               Advanced Communications              Company's Amendment to  Form
               Technologies, Inc. and Advanced      10-KSB   filed   on  May 23,
               Communications Technologies          2002.
               (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

10.18          Letter of Intent dated September     Incorporated by reference to
               7, 2001 re: Purchase of Advanced     Exhibit 10.18 to   Amendment
               Communications (Australia)           No. 1 to the  Company's Form
                                                    10-QSB for the quarter ended
                                                    December 31, 2001

10.19          Securities Purchase Agreement,       Incorporated by reference to
               dated November 2002, by and among    Exhibit   10.19    to    the
               Advanced Communications and Buyers   Company's Form    10-KSB for
                                                    the year ended June 30, 2002

10.20          Investor Registration Rights         Incorporated by reference to
               Agreement, dated November 2002, by   Exhibit    10.20   to    the
               and among Advanced Communications    Company's  Form  10-KSB  for
               and Investors                        the year ended June 30, 2002

10.21          Secured Convertible Debenture        Incorporated by reference to
                                                    Exhibit    10.21    to   the
                                                    Company's  Form   10-KSB for
                                                    the year ended June 30, 2002

10.22          Escrow Agreement, dated November     Incorporated by reference to
               2002, by and among Advanced          Exhibit   10.22     to   the
               Communications, Buyers, and          Company's   Form  10-KSB for
               Wachovia Bank, N.A.                  the year ended June 30, 2002

10.23          Irrevocable Transfer Agent           Incorporated by reference to
               Instructions, dated November 2002    Exhibit    10.23     to  the
                                                    Company's Form    10-KSB for
                                                    the year ended June 30, 2002

10.24          Security Agreement, dated November   Incorporated by reference to
               2002, by and among Advanced          Exhibit   10.24    to    the
               Communications and Buyers            Company's Form 10-KSB    for
                                                    the year ended June 30, 2002

10.25          Middletons Lawyers Letter, dated     Incorporated by reference to
               November 11, 2002, terminating the   Exhibit    10.25    to   the
               April 2000 Stock Purchase            Company's Form  10-KSB   for
               Agreement between Advanced           the year ended June 30, 2002
               Communications Technologies, Inc.
               and Advanced Communications
               (Australia)

10.26          Consulting Agreement dated July 1,   Incorporated by reference to
               2002, between Advanced               Exhibit    10.26    to   the
               Communications and Randall H.        Company's  Form  10-KSB  for
               Prouty                               the year ended Jne 30, 2002

               (ii)  Reports on Form 8-K:


         On May 10, 2002,  the Company filed a Form 8-K  disclosing an update to
its pending litigation with Advanced Communications (Australia), the resignation
of Gary Ivaska, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and the appointment of
Wayne Danson as President.

         On July 23, 2002,  the Company filed a Form 8-K disclosing an update to
its  pending  litigation  with  Advanced  Communications   (Australia)  and  its
voluntary administration.

                                       34
<PAGE>

         On September 4, 2002, the Company filed a Form 8-K disclosing an update
to its pending litigation with Advanced Communications (Australia).

         On November 6, 2002,  the Company filed a Form 8-K disclosing an update
on the status of its litigation against Advanced  Communication  (Australia) and
the termination of the License and Distribution Agreement.

                                       35
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         In  accordance  with  Section  13 or 15(d)  of the  Exchange  Act,  the
registrant  caused  this  report to be signed on its behalf by the  undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.

                                      ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                    By:   /s/ Wayne I. Danson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Wayne I. Danson
                                    Title: President and Chief Financial Officer

         In accordance  with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
by the following  persons on behalf of the  registrant and in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE                            TITLE                            DATE
---------                            -----                            ----

/s/ Wayne I. Danson
---------------------------
Wayne I. Danson                President (Principal Executive        May 2, 2003
                               Officer), Chief Financial Officer
                               (Principal Accounting Officer)
                               and Director

/s/ Jonathan Lichtman, Esq.
---------------------------
Jonathan Lichtman, Esq.        Secretary and Director                May 2, 2003


/s/ Randall Prouty
---------------------------
Randall Prouty                 Director                              May 2, 2003


/s/ Wilbank J. Roche, Esq.
---------------------------
Wilbank J. Roche, Esq.         Director                              May 2, 2003


/s/ Michael Finch
---------------------------
Michael Finch                  Director                              May 2, 2003

                                       36
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Advanced  Communications
Technologies,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended June
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  each of the  undersigned,  in the  capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that  to his
knowledge:

         1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.



Date:    May 2, 2003              By:  /s/ Wayne I. Danson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Wayne I. Danson
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer

                                      A-1
<PAGE>

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

         I, Wayne I. Danson,  President and Chief Financial  Officer of Advanced
Communications Technologies, Inc., hereby certify that:

         1.    I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A of Advanced Communications;

         2.    Based on my  knowledge,  the report  does not  contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading  with respect to the period covered by the
report; and

         3.    Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other
financial  information  included in the report,  fairly  present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.



Date:    May 2, 2003                       /s/ Wayne I. Danson
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Wayne I. Danson
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer


                                      B-1
<PAGE>

                             ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS
                       TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                               AS OF JUNE 30, 2002

                                      F-i
<PAGE>

                   ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                    CONTENTS


PAGE     F-2   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

PAGE     F-3   CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001

PAGE     F-4   CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE
               30, 2002 AND 2001

PAGE     F-5   CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN  STOCKHOLDERS'  DEFICIENCY
               FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND 2001

PAGE     F-6   CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS  ENDED JUNE
               30, 2002 AND 2001

PAGES    F-8   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                                      F-1
<PAGE>

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors of:

   Advanced Communications Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Advanced
Communications Technologies, Inc., and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002 and 2001
and the related consolidated statements of operations,  changes in stockholders'
deficiency  and cash  flows for the years  ended June 30,  2002 and 2001.  These
consolidated  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of the  Company's
management.  Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on these  consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the  United  States of  America.  Those  standards  require  that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial  statements  are free of  material  misstatement.  An  audit  includes
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the  consolidated  financial  statements.  An audit also includes  assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated  financial statements referred to above present
fairly  in  all  material   respects,   the   financial   position  of  Advanced
Communications Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002 and 2001,
and the  results of their  operations  and their cash flows for the years  ended
June 30,  2002 and  2001 in  conformity  with  accounting  principles  generally
accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying  consolidated  financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will  continue as a going  concern.  As discussed in Note 11 to
the consolidated  financial  statements,  the Company's  significant net loss of
$4,332,693  for the year ended June 30, 2002, a working  capital  deficiency  of
$3,252,643,  and a  stockholders'  deficiency of $4,940,050,  raise  substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going  concern.  Management's  plans in
regards  to these  matters  are also  described  in Note  11.  The  accompanying
consolidated  financial  statements  do not include any  adjustments  that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.



WEINBERG & COMPANY, P.A.



Boca Raton, Florida
September  7, 2002  (except for Note 12 (A) and (B) as to which date is December
4, 2002)

                                      F-2
<PAGE>

           ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                         JUNE 30, 2002 AND JUNE 30, 2001

                                                          JUNE 30,
                                                   2002               2001
                                               ------------------------------
                                     ASSETS
                                     ------

  CURRENT ASSETS
  Cash                                         $    11,093        $     6,816
  Prepaid Expenses                                       -             10,000
                                               -----------        -----------
  TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS                              11,093             16,816
                                               -----------        -----------

  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (NET)                      17,274             19,599
                                               -----------        -----------

  OTHER ASSETS
  Purchase Goodwill-ACT-AU                               -          2,000,000
  Security Deposits                                 13,225              5,525
  Other Receivables                                  9,927                  -
                                               -----------        -----------

  Deferred Bond Financing Costs, net of
    accumulated amortization                        63,333                 --
    Total Other Assets                              86,485          2,005,525
                                               -----------        -----------

TOTAL ASSETS
-------------                                  $   114,852        $ 2,041,940
                                               ===========        ===========

                    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
                    ----------------------------------------

LIABILITIES

  CURRENT LIABILITIES
  Accounts Payable                             $   872,493        $   844,205
  Accrued Compensation                             172,183            479,050
  Note Payable-Grassland                                 -            118,530
  Loan Payable to Shareholder                    1,055,736            796,000
  12% Convertible Debentures                       100,407            200,750
  5% Convertible Debentures                      1,000,000                  -
  Interest Payable                                  62,917                  -
                                               ------------       ------------
  TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES                      3,263,736          2,438,535

  LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
  Note Payable-ACT-Australia                     1,791,166          2,173,167
                                               ------------       ------------
  TOTAL OTHER LIABILITIES                        1,791,166          2,173,167
                                               ------------       ------------

TOTAL LIABILITIES                                5,054,902          4,611,702
                                               ------------       ------------

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
  Preferred Stock, $.01 Par Value,
    25,000,000 Shares Authorized, none
    issued and outstanding                               -                  -
  Common Stock, No Par Value, 200,000,000
    and 100,000,000 Shares Authorized,
    114,102,622 and 94,489,916 shares issued
    and outstanding, respectively               25,471,098         22,696,193
  Common Stock to be issued, 8333,334 shares             -            250,000
  Deferred Commitment fees, net of
    accumulated amortization                      (562,500)                 -
  Accumulated Deficit                          (29,848,648)       (25,515,955)
                                               ------------       ------------
  TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY                (4,940,050)         (2,569,762)
                                               ------------       ------------

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
  DEFICIENCY                                   $   114,852        $ 2,041,940
                                               ============       ============


          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

                                       F-3
<PAGE>

           ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
               FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND JUNE 30, 2001

                                                  2002               2001
                                               -----------        -----------

SALES                                          $         -        $    50,000
COST OF SALES                                            -            (57,310)
                                               ------------       ------------
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)                                      -             (7,310)
                                               ------------       ------------

OPERATING EXPENSES

  Consulting Fees                                  (10,149)           567,625
  Amortization and Depreciation                    508,167          1,051,169
  Professional Fees                              1,228,780          1,214,739
  Other Selling, General and Administrative
    Expenses                                       407,772            501,048
  Stock-Based Compensation                         180,000                  -
                                               ------------       ------------

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES                         2,314,570          3,334,581
                                               ------------       ------------

(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS                          (2,314,570)        (3,341,891)
                                               ------------       ------------

OTHER EXPENSES
  Interest expense                                (318,123)           (10,332)
  Loss from investment                                   -         (3,571,654)
  Loss from impairment of goodwill              (1,700,000)       (12,399,864)
  Loss on investment acquisition deposit                 -           (425,000)
  Realized loss on decline in marketable
    securities                                           -             (6,825)
                                               ------------       ------------

TOTAL OTHER (EXPENSES)                          (2,018,123)       (16,413,675)
                                               ------------       ------------

(LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY GAIN                (4,332,693)       (19,755,566)


EXTRAORDINARY GAIN
  Gain on extinguishment of debt                         -             23,000
                                               ------------       ------------

NET (LOSS)                                     $(4,332,693)      $(19,732,566)
----------                                     ============      =============

Net (Loss) Per Share- Basic and Dilutive       $     (0.04)      $      (0.22)
                                               ============      =============

Weighted Average Number of Shares
Outstanding During the Period- Basic
  and Dilutive                                 100,576,484         87,976,428
                                               ============      =============


          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

                                      F-4
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
                                     ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
                                         FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND JUNE 30, 2001



<CAPTION>
                                                                                          COMMON STOCK TO
                                                   COMMON STOCK                              BE ISSUED            COMMON   DEFERRED
                                             -------------------------   ACCUMULATED   ---------------------      STOCK   COMMITMENT
                                               SHARES       AMOUNT         DEFICIT      SHARES     AMOUNT        ADVANCES    FEES
                                             ----------  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>         <C>           <C>               <C>      <C>          <C>        <C>
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2000                     82,227,280  $ 16,865,441  $  (5,783,389)                          $(375,000)         -

Stock issued for cash                         3,060,600       642,726
Stock warrants issued for cash                                275,454
Stock to be issued                                                                       833,334  $   250,000
Stock issued for offering costs                 250,000
Stock issued for services                     1,051,491       328,870
Stock issued for extinguishment of debt       6,597,000     4,545,902
Stock issued for conversion of convertible
  debt                                        1,803,545       412,800
Common stock retired                           (500,000)     (375,000)                                           375,000
Net (loss) for the year                                                  (19,732,566)
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2001                     94,489,916   $22,696,193  $ (25,515,955)    833,334  $   250,000          -          -
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stock issued for services                     6,334,679       677,634                    (33,334)     (10,000)
Stock issued for extinguishments of
  debt                                        1,190,000       357,001
Stock issued for conversion of
  convertible debt                            4,250,000       100,343
Stock issued for cash                         1,233,333       260,000                   (800,000)    (240,000)
Stock warrants issued for cash                        -       110,000
Stock issued for offering costs                 137,727             -
Stock and warrants issued from
  repricing of previously issued
  shares                                      2,146,967             -
Stock issued to Directors for
  services                                    1,000,000       180,000
Stock issued for commitment fees              3,000,000       750,000                                                     $(562,500)
Capital contribution                                  -         9,927
Stock issued in settlement of lawsuit           320,000        80,000
Interest on beneficial conversion-
  Convertible Debentures                              -       250,000
Net (loss) for the year                                                   (4,332,693)
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2002                    114,102,622  $ 25,471,098  $ (29,848,648)          -  $         -  $          $(562,500)
                                            ========================================================================================
</TABLE>



          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

                                      F-5
<PAGE>


           ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
               FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 AND JUNE 30, 2001


                                                          2002          2001
                                                     ------------   ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
------------------------------------

Net (loss)                                          $ (4,332,693)  $(19,732,566)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used:
Depreciation and amortization                            508,167      1,051,169
Realized loss on decline in marketable securities              -          6,825
Stock issued for services                                847,634        328,870
Stock issued in settlement of lawsuit                     80,000
Gain on extinguishment of debt                                 -        (23,000)
Loss from investment                                           -      3,571,654
Loss from  impairment of goodwill                      1,700,000     12,399,864
Accrued compensation                                    (306,867)       247,500
Interest Expense on Beneficial Conversion Feature        250,000              -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in assets
  Prepaid expense                                         10,000         36,118
  Deposits and other                                       7,700         40,000
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
  Accounts payable                                        28,288        633,235
  Interest payable                                        62,917         10,332
  Deferred revenue and other                              41,600        (50,000)
                                                     ------------   ------------
   Net cash used in operating activities              (1,103,254)    (1,479,999)
                                                     ------------   ------------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
------------------------------------

Loan to unconsolidated affiliated company                      -       (247,608)
Purchase of fixed assets                                  (1,675)        (8,411)
Repayment of loan to unconsolidated affiliate            (25,000)             -
                                                     ------------   ------------
  Net cash used in investing activities                  (26,675)      (256,019)
                                                     ------------   ------------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
------------------------------------

Repayment of note payable                               (118,530)             -
Loan proceeds from shareholder                           259,736        544,500
Proceeds from stock to be issued                               -        250,000
Proceed from issuance of common stock
and warrants net of offering costs                       130,000        918,180
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debentures, net    889,000
Proceeds from short-term loan, net of financing fees     299,000              -
Repayment of short-term loan                            (325,000)             -
                                                     ------------   ------------
  Net cash provided by financing activities            1,134,206      1,712,680
                                                     ------------   ------------

Net increase (decrease) in cash                            4,277        (23,338)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year             6,816         30,154
                                                     ------------   ------------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR                  11,093          6,816
----------------------------------------             ===========    ============

          See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

                                      F-6
<PAGE>



SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

During the year ended June 30,  2002,  the Company  issued  1,190,000  shares of
common stock, valued at $357,001,  in partial payment of notes payable held by a
related  Australian  corporation,  in  whom  we  hold  a 20%  investment,  and a
non-related company (See Notes 6(B) and 8(D)).

During the year ended  June 30,  2002 the  Company  issued  4,250,000  shares of
common stock, valued at $100,343, for the conversion of convertible debentures.

During the year ended June 30,  2001,  the Company  issued  6,597,000  shares of
common stock, valued at $4,545,902,  in partial payment of notes payable held by
a  related  Australian  corporation,  in whom we  hold a 20%  investment,  and a
non-related company (See Notes 6(B) and 8(D)).

During the year ended June 30,  2001,  the Company  issued  1,803,545  shares of
common stock, valued at $412,800, for the conversion of convertible debentures.

                                      F-7
<PAGE>

NOTE 1.  PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(A) ORGANIZATION
----------------

The  Company  was  formed on April 30,  1998 and was  inactive  from its date of
formation  until April 1999 when it acquired  all of the issued and  outstanding
stock of Media Forum International, Inc. ("MFI") in a reverse merger. The merger
was  treated  as  an  acquisition  of  all  of  the  assets  of  MFI  and  as  a
recapitalization  of the  Company.  In July 1999,  the Company  formed  Advanced
Global Communications,  Inc. ("AGC") as a wholly owned subsidiary to conduct its
international  telephone network distribution business. On January 31, 2000, the
Company   acquired   all  of  the  then   issued  and   outstanding   shares  of
SmartInvestment.com,  Inc. ("Smart") an inactive reporting company,  for 200,000
shares of restricted  common stock. The Company elected  successor issuer status
to become a fully  reporting  company.  The Company  treated  the  purchase as a
recapitalization,  and  has  not  recorded  any  goodwill  associated  with  the
acquisition.  On April 5, 2000,  the  Company  acquired  a 20% equity  ownership
interest in Advanced  Communications  Technology  (Australia) Pty Ltd ("Advanced
Communications  (Australia)"),  an unconsolidated affiliated entity. The Company
is currently in litigation over its ownership  rights.  SEE NOTE  10(B)(IV).  On
July 5, 2000, the Company entered into a License and Distribution Agreement with
Advanced Communications  Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd. pursuant to which the
Company  has the  exclusive  rights to market  and  distribute  the  SpectruCell
technology in North,  South and Central  America.  The License and  Distribution
Agreement is effective for an indefinite period. The parties to this License and
Distribution  Agreement are currently  involved in litigation in connection with
this agreement.  (SEE NOTE 10(B)(IV). In July 2000, the Company formed Australon
USA, Inc. ("Australon"), a Delaware corporation owned 50% by the Company and 50%
by Australon  Enterprises  Pty.,  Ltd., a publicly  traded company listed on the
Australian Stock Exchange and a 66% owned subsidiary of Advanced  Communications
(Australia).  In November 2000, the Company formed Advanced Network Technologies
(USA), Inc. ("ANT"), a Delaware  corporation owned 70% by the Company and 30% by
Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  Both  Australon and ANT are inactive and
have never been  operational.  Australon  Enterprises  Pty Ltd is an  Australian
public company that manufactures and distributes  remote monitoring  devices for
homes and  businesses  such as remote meter  reading and  residential  automated
gateway  devices.  While Mr. May, our former CEO and Chairman of the Board has a
significant   ownership  interest  in  Australon  Enterprise  Pty,  through  his
ownership  interest  in ACT  AU,  he is  not  involved  in  Australon  `s  daily
management  or  business  operations  and is not  represented  on its  Board  of
Directors.  The  joint  venture  relationship  was  established  while  Mr.  May
controlled both companies.  Presently,  the company is not in negotiations  with
Australon  Enterprises  Pty  and  will  not  enter  into  any  discussions  with
Australon's management until the Company's lawsuit with Advanced  Communications
(Australia)Advanced   Communications   (Australia)  and  Mr.  May  is  resolved.
Australon  USA,  Inc is inactive and will remain  inactive  for the  foreseeable
future.

The  Company  will  account  for the future  results of  operations,  if any, of
Australon on an equity basis and ANT on a consolidated basis.

The Company is a marketing  company whose  primary  activity is the ownership of
the rights to the SpectruCell  technology  including a License and  Distribution
Agreement and its investment in Advanced Communications (Australia). The Company
expects to generate  revenue from the  marketing  and  distribution  of Advanced
Communications (Australia)'s software defined radio based wireless communication
product  "SpectruCell".  The Company has not generated any meaningful revenue to
date.

(B) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
-------------------------------

The accompanying  consolidated  financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its inactive  subsidiaries  AGC,  Australon and ANT. All significant
intercompany  transactions  and balances have been eliminated in  consolidation.
The Company accounts for its investment in Advanced Communications  (Australia),
a non-consolidated affiliate (a 20-50% owned company over which the Company does
not exercise control) under the equity method of accounting.

(C) USE OF ESTIMATES
--------------------

In preparing  consolidated  financial  statements in conformity  with  generally
accepted  accounting  principles,  management is required to make  estimates and
assumptions  that affect the reported  amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent  assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial  statements  and  revenues and  expenses  during the reported  period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.

                                      F-8
<PAGE>

(D) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
---------------------------------------

The carrying amounts of the Company's  accounts  payable,  accrued  liabilities,
debentures,  and loans  payable  approximates  fair value due to the  relatively
short period to maturity for these instruments.

(E) MARKETABLE SECURITIES
-------------------------

Management  determines the appropriate  classification of its investments at the
time of acquisition and  reevaluates  such  determination  at each balance sheet
date.  Available-for-sale  securities are carried at fair value, with unrealized
losses, reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity.

Declines in the fair value of  individual  available-for-sale  securities  below
their cost that are other than  temporary  would  result in  write-downs  of the
individual  securities to their fair value. The related write-downs are included
in earnings as realized losses.

(F) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
--------------------------

Property and equipment  are stated at cost and  depreciated,  using  accelerated
methods, over the estimated useful lives of 5 years.

(G) LONG-LIVED ASSETS
---------------------

The Company reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable assets related to
those assets for impairment  whenever  circumstances  and situations change such
that there is an indication that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable.

(H) INCOME TAXES
----------------

Deferred  tax  assets  and   liabilities  are  recognized  for  the  future  tax
consequences   attributable  to  differences  between  the  financial  statement
carrying  amounts of existing assets and  liabilities  and their  respective tax
bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected  to apply to  taxable  income  in the  years in which  those  temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax
assets and  liabilities  of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the
period that includes the enactment date.

There was no current income tax expense for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002
and 2001 due to net  operating  losses in both  periods.  Any deferred tax asset
arising  from  the  future   benefit  of  the  Company's   net  operating   loss
carryforward, of approximately $13,948,000, has been fully reserved.

(I) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
------------------------

The  Company  accounts  for  Comprehensive  Income  (Loss)  under the  Financial
Accounting  Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130,
"Reporting  Comprehensive  Income"  (Statement  No.  130").  Statement  No.  130
establishes  standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its
components.

(J) REVENUE RECOGNITION
-----------------------

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, revenue was generally recognized at the
time telephone service minutes were used and based on the volume of call service
provided  to  customers  and  processed  by the  Company's  contractual  service
providers.  The Company recognized no revenue for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2002.

(K) CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
--------------------------------

The Company  maintains its cash in bank deposit  accounts,  which, at times, may
exceed federally  insured limits.  The Company has not experienced any losses in
such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any  significant  credit risk on
cash and cash equivalents.

(L) LOSS PER SHARE
------------------

Basic and dilutive net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted
average common shares outstanding.

                                      F-9
<PAGE>

(M) NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board has  recently  issued  several  new
Statements  of Financial  Accounting  Standards.  Statement  No. 141,  "Business
Combinations"  supersedes  APB  Opinion 16 and various  related  pronouncements.
Pursuant to the new  guidance in Statement  No. 141,  all business  combinations
must  be  accounted   for  under  the  purchase   method  of   accounting;   the
pooling-of-interests  method is no longer  permitted.  SFAS 141 also establishes
new rules  concerning the  recognition of goodwill and other  intangible  assets
arising in a purchase  business  combination  and  requires  disclosure  of more
information  concerning  a  business  combination  in the  period in which it is
completed.  This  statement is  generally  effective  for business  combinations
initiated on or after July 1, 2001.

Statement No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" supercedes APB Opinion
17 and  related  interpretations.  Statement  No. 142  establishes  new rules on
accounting for the  acquisition of intangible  assets not acquired in a business
combination and the manner in which goodwill and all other intangibles should be
accounted for subsequent to their initial recognition in a business  combination
accounted for under SFAS No. 141. Under SFAS No. 142,  intangible  assets should
be recorded at fair value.  Intangible assets with finite useful lives should be
amortized  over such  period  and those  with  indefinite  lives  should  not be
amortized.  All intangible assets being amortized as well as those that are not,
are both  subject  to  review  for  potential  impairment  under  SFAS No.  121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed of". SFAS No. 142 also requires that goodwill  arising in a business
combination  should not be amortized but is subject to impairment testing at the
reporting  unit level to which the  goodwill  was assigned to at the date of the
business combination.

SFAS No. 142 is effective for years  beginning  after December 15, 2001 and must
be applied as of the beginning of such year to all goodwill and other intangible
assets that have already been  recorded in the balance sheet as of the first day
in which SFAS No. 142 is initially applied,  regardless of when such assets were
acquired.  Goodwill acquired in a business combination whose acquisition date is
on or after July 1, 2001,  should not be  amortized,  but should be reviewed for
impairment  pursuant to SFAS No. 121,  even though SFAS No. 142 has not yet been
adopted.  However,  previously acquired goodwill should continue to be amortized
until SFAS No. 142 is first adopted. The Company intends to adopt the provisions
of SFAS 142 in its financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.

Statement No. 143  "Accounting  for Asset  Retirement  Obligations"  establishes
standards for the initial measurement and subsequent  accounting for obligations
associated with the sale,  abandonment,  or other type of disposal of long-lived
tangible  assets  arising from the  acquisition,  construction,  or  development
and/or  normal  operation  of such assets.  SFAS No. 143 is effective  for years
beginning after June 15, 2002, with earlier application encouraged.

In August 2001,  the FASB issued SFAS 144,  "Accounting  for the  Impairment  or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This statement  addresses  financial  accounting
and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supercedes
FASB Statement No. 121,  "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and
for  Long-Lived  Assets to be Disposed of." The  provisions of the statement are
effective  for  financial  statements  issued for fiscal years  beginning  after
December 15, 2001.

With the exception of the adoption of SFAS No. 142 (See Note 2), the adoption of
these  pronouncements is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's
financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 2.  INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATE
-----------------------------------------------

In April  2000,  the  Company  acquired  20% of the  common  stock  of  Advanced
Communications  (Australia),  an unconsolidated affiliate. The purchase price of
the investment amounted to $19,350,000,  and was comprised of a note payable for
$7,500,000 (See Note 1(A) and Note 6(B)) and the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of
restricted common stock valued at $11,850,000.  The shares issued were valued at
the average quoted trading price during the acquisition  period.  The fair value
of the investment at the acquisition  date was determined to be $3,657,472.  The
excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the investment in the amount
of $15,692,528 was accounted for as goodwill.

The Company's 20% interest in Advanced Communications  (Australia) was accounted
for using the equity method of accounting  and was stated at the amortized  cost
of goodwill and the equity in  undistributed  earnings  since  acquisition.  The
equity in earnings of Advanced  Communications  (Australia) was adjusted for the
amortization of the goodwill, as discussed above. During the year ended June 30,
2001,  the  Company  reduced the  carrying  value of its  unconsolidated  equity
investment  in  Advanced  Communications  to  $2,000,000  based on  management's
evaluation of Advanced  Communications  (Australia)'s  fair market  value.  This
adjustment  was required by FASB 121  ("Accounting  for Impairment of Long-Lived

                                      F-10
<PAGE>

Assets") and APB 18 ("The Equity Method of Accounting for  Investments in Common
Stock"). Such pronouncements  require the annual evaluation of long-lived assets
for impairment.

Advanced Communications (Australia) had a current period operating loss combined
with a history of operating losses due to the fact that Advanced  Communications
(Australia) has been in development stage activities since inception and has not
generated  any  sales  revenue  for  its   products.   Advanced   Communications
(Australia)'s   projections  of  estimated   future  cash  flows  could  not  be
objectively  verified  because  Advanced  Communications   (Australia)  had  not
completed scheduled field trials of the SpectruCell  product, a requisite before
sales can be recognized. Based on these factors, management completely wrote-off
its  investment  in  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  and  wrote-down  its
investment in Advanced Communications (Australia)'s goodwill to $2,000,000 based
on the fair market value of Advanced  Communications  (Australia)'s 66% majority
ownership interest in Australon  Enterprises,  Ltd, a publicly traded Australian
company.

Amortization was computed on a straight-line basis over fifteen years until June
30, 2001 when the Company  re-assessed  the life of the  goodwill to be 5 years.
This change  coupled with the write down of goodwill  resulted in a reduction of
Goodwill  amortization  on a  quarterly  basis from  $261,542 to  $100,000.  The
amortization  of goodwill  charged to income for the fiscal years ended June 30,
2002 and June 30, 2001 was $300,000 and $1,046,169, respectively.

Due to litigation by the Australian Tax Office against  Advanced  Communications
(Australia) and Advanced  Communications  (Australia)'s  subsequent filing on or
about  July  18,  2002  for  protection  under  Australia's  insolvency  laws by
appointing an  Independent  Administrator  to take over its business and affairs
(see Note  10(B)(iv)),  management  has determined  that its remaining  goodwill
investment is impaired pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 142. Accordingly,  the
Company has written off the balance of its  unamortized  goodwill of  $1,700,000
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.

The  components of the  Company's  investment  in its  unconsolidated  affiliate
Advanced Communications (Australia) at June 30, 2002 are as follows:

<TABLE>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                INVESTMENT                GOODWILL                   TOTAL
                                              ---------------         --------------          ---------------
<S>                                           <C>                     <C>                     <C>
At acquisition                                $    3,657,472          $   15,692,528          $   19,350,000

Cumulative Investment loss                        (3,657,472)                     --              (3,657,472)
Amortization of goodwill                                  --              (1,292,664)             (1,292,664)
Impairment of goodwill                                    --             (12,399,864)            (12,399,864)
                                               --------------         ---------------         ---------------

Balance at June 30, 2001                       $          --          $    2,000,000          $    2,000,000

Cumulative amortization of goodwill
  through March 31, 2002                                                    (300,000)               (300,000)
Impairment of goodwill                                    --              (1,700,000)             (1,700,000)
                                              ---------------         --------------          ---------------
Balance at June 30, 2002                       $          --          $           --          $           --
                                              ===============         ==============          ===============
</TABLE>

NOTE 3.  REALIZED LOSS ON DECLINE IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES
----------------------------------------------------------

The Company's  marketable  securities were comprised of equity  securities,  all
classified as  available-for-sale,  which were carried at their fair value based
upon the quoted  market prices of those  investments  at June 30, 2001 and 2000.
Declines in the fair value that are other than  temporary  result in write-downs
of the securities and are included in earnings as realized  losses.  The Company
determined  there was a permanent  decline in the fair value of these securities
and at June 30, 2001 the Company wrote down these securities to their fair value
of $0. This resulted in $6,825 being  recognized in the statements of operations
as a realized loss on decline in marketable  securities  for the year ended June
30, 2001.

                                      F-11
<PAGE>

NOTE 4.  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
-------------------------------
                                                     2002              2001
                                                ------------      -----------

             Computer and office equipment      $    32,909       $   31,234
             Less:  Accumulated depreciation        (15,635)         (11,635)
                                                ------------      -----------
             Property and equipment - net            17,274           19,599
                                                ============      ===========


Depreciation  expense  for the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 was $4,000 and
$5,000, respectively.

NOTE 5.  ACCRUED COMPENSATION

The  Company  had an oral  agreement  with Mr.  Roger  May to serve as the Chief
Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. May agreed to defer payment of the amounts
owed him pursuant to the oral agreement due to the Company's lack of funds.  The
Company owed Mr. May $479,050 at June 30,  2001.  On November 30, 2001,  Mr. May
was removed as the Company's Chief Executive  Officer.  Subsequent to that date,
Mr.  May was not  entitled  to  receive  any  additional  compensation  from the
Company.

At the request of the Company's Board of Directors,  the Compensation  Committee
conducted a review of the nature of the past services provided by Mr. May to the
Company  to  determine  whether a portion  of such  services  are more  properly
allocable to the Company's unconsolidated Australian affiliate. At the Company's
March 26, 2002 Board of Director's meeting,  the Board of Directors  unanimously
approved the  recommendation  of the Compensation  Committee to reduce Mr. May's
prior accrued compensation by $394,361  representing  services Mr. May performed
for  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)Advanced  Communications  (Australia),
leaving a balance of $172,183 at June 30, 2002.

NOTE 6.  NOTES AND LOAN PAYABLE
-------------------------------

(A) NOTE PAYABLE-GRASSLAND

MFI was  obligated  to pay  $150,000 to a company  (the  "Payee")  pursuant to a
convertible  promissory  note.  During  December  1997, MFI issued 75,000 of its
common shares to settle the amounts due to the Payee.  However,  a dispute arose
as to whether the Payee authorized the issuance of the shares. The Payee filed a
suit during  December 1997 to enforce the  convertible  promissory  note.  Total
interest  payable  was  $84,507  as of June  30,  2000  resulting  in the  total
principal  and accrued  interest  payable at June 30, 2000 of $234,507.  In June
2000,  the parties  agreed to settle the matter for a payment of $200,000.  This
resulted  in a gain on  extinguishment  of debt in the  amount of  $34,507.  The
Company made a payment of $50,000 by June 30, 2000.  The $150,000  remainder was
to be paid with  proceeds  from the  75,000  shares  of stock and any  remaining
balance to be paid by the  Company.  The  revised  obligation  was to be paid by
August 14, 2000. The Company defaulted on this revised payment  obligation and a
judgment against the Company was entered.  In October 2000, the Company sold the
75,000 shares of stock realizing  $41,802 which it remitted in partial repayment
of its outstanding  debt. As of June 30, 2001, the Company's  remaining  balance
and accrued  interest on this obligation was $118,530.  An additional  $4,206 of
interest  was accrued on this note and on October 19, 2001 the Company  paid the
obligation  in full.  On October 24, 2001 the Company  received  notice from the
court that the judgment has been satisfied.

(B) NOTE PAYABLE TO ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS (AUSTRALIA)
-------------------------------------------------------

The Company had a  non-interest  bearing and unsecured  note payable to Advanced
Communications  (Australia)  of $7,500,000 as of April 5, 2000 (See Note 2). The
note was payable in three equal monthly installments commencing on May 31, 2000.
Under the terms of the Stock  Purchase  Agreement  with Advanced  Communications
(Australia),  the monthly installment payments were extended without interest to
allow for the Company , on a best  efforts  basis,  to raise the cash portion of
the purchase price through a private or public offering of securities. There are
no  default  or  penalty  provisions  under  the  terms  of the  Stock  Purchase
Agreement.  Upon raising  funds  pursuant to a private or public  offering,  the
Company shall only be obligated to repay Advanced  Communications  (Australia)'s
note with those funds  remaining after deduction for reserves needed for current
operations,  working capital and the development and expansion of its operations
and the operations of its subsidiaries,  as determined by the Company's Board of
Directors.

                                      F-12
<PAGE>

The  following  schedule  represents  payments  on  such  debt  by  issuance  of
restricted  common  stock  to  either  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  or
creditors or employees of Advanced Communications (Australia). Such transactions
were recorded at the market price of the stock at date of issuance.

                                       SHARES
           DATE                OF COMMON STOCK ISSUED                 VALUE
       ---------------         ----------------------              -------------

       September 2000                  5,000,000                   $  3,500,000
       October 2000(1)                   460,000                        460,000
       June 2001                       1,137,000                        567,100
       September 2001                  1,190,000                        357,001
                                    ------------                   -------------
                                       7,787,000                   $  4,884,101
                                    ============                   =============

(1)    This transaction resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $23,000.

During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 the Company  repaid $25,000
and $247,608 of the obligation in cash, respectively.

Pursuant to the terms of the April 5, 2000 Stock Purchase  Agreement between the
Company  and  Advanced  Communications  (Australia),  the Company has elected to
reduce its outstanding loan balance by $552,125 for funds previously advanced to
Advanced Communications (Australia).

As of June 30,  2002,  the  balance  of the  Company's  obligation  to  Advanced
Communications   (Australia)  was  $1,791,166.   The  Company  is  currently  in
litigation with Advanced Communications (Australia) regarding the attempt by Mr.
May and Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  to lien or transfer the Company's
shares in Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  for alleged  nonpayment  of the
Company's obligation (See Note 10 (B)(iv.)).

(C) LOAN PAYABLE TO SHAREHOLDER
-------------------------------

As of June 30, 2002 and 2001, the Company owed Global Communications  Technology
Pty Ltd., an Australian  company  wholly-owned  by Mr. May, a former officer and
director  of the  Company,  $1,055,736  and  $796,000  respectfully,  for  funds
advanced to the Company to provide  working  capital.  This loan is non-interest
bearing and  unsecured,  and has no scheduled  date for  repayment.  The Company
believes  that  the loan is not due  upon  demand.  However,  since  the  actual
repayment  terms are not known with any  specificity  because  the terms are not
confirmed  in a  written  document,  the loan has been  classified  as a current
liability.

(D) SHORT TERM LOAN PAYABLE
---------------------------

On December 13, 2001 the Company entered into a 90 day $325,000  Promissory Note
(the "Note") with Cornell  Capital  Partners,  LP. The Note bore interest at 12%
and  was  secured  by  a  Guaranty  and  Pledge  Agreement   executed  by  three
stockholders.  The Company  realized  $269,000 of net proceeds  after  financing
costs and legal fees. The Note was repaid on January 14, 2002 with proceeds from
the Company's $1 million Convertible Debenture (See Note 7(B)).

NOTE 7.  CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
-------------------------------

(A) AJW PARTNERS, LLC AND NEW MILLENNIUM CAPITAL PARTNERS II, LLC
-----------------------------------------------------------------

On September 30, 1999, the Company entered into secured  convertible  debentures
purchase  agreements  with two  investors,  who were  also  stockholders  of the
Company, whereby the Company sold $500,000 of 12% Secured Convertible Debentures
due April 1, 2000,  which were  convertible  into shares of the Company's Common
Stock.  In  addition,   on  September  30,  1999,  the  Company  issued  another
convertible  debenture  to Bank  Insinger  de  Beaufort  N.V.  in the  amount of
$150,000.  The debentures were convertible,  at the holder's option, into shares
of common stock in whole or in part at any time after the  original  issue date.
The  number of  shares of common  stock  issuable  upon a  conversion  was to be
determined by dividing the outstanding  principal  amount of the debenture to be
converted,  plus all accrued  interest,  by the conversion price. The conversion
price in effect on any  conversion  date is 50% of the  average of the bid price
during the twenty trading days immediately  preceding the applicable  conversion
date.

                                      F-13
<PAGE>

The convertible debentures contained a beneficial conversion feature computed at
its intrinsic value which is the difference between the conversion price and the
fair value on the  debenture  issuance  date of the common  stock into which the
debt is  convertible,  multiplied by the number of shares into which the debt is
convertible at the commitment date. Since the beneficial  conversion  feature is
to be  settled by  issuing  equity,  the  amount  attributed  to the  beneficial
conversion  feature,  of  $650,000,  was  recorded as an interest  expense and a
component of equity on the  issuance  date during the fiscal year ended June 30,
2000.

The Company  further  reduced  these bonds  payable by offsetting a related bond
receivable in the amount of $36,450.

Between October and December 2000, AJW Partners,  LLC and New Millennium Capital
Partners  II, LLC elected to convert  $262,800 of  convertible  debentures  into
860,378 shares of the Company's restricted common stock.

In December  2000,  Bank Insinger de Beaufort N.V.  converted its $150,000 note,
inclusive of accrued and unpaid  interest  into 943,167  shares of the Company's
restricted common stock.

On April 24, 2002 the Company  entered into a Settlement  Agreement with the two
note holders,  AJW Partners,  LLC and New Millennium  Capital  Partners II, LLC.
Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement,  the note holders agreed to dismiss
their  lawsuit and convert  their  remaining  unpaid  obligation,  inclusive  of
accrued and unpaid  interest,  into  8,500,000  shares of the  Company's  common
stock,  payable over a 180-day  period.  On April 24, 2002 and June 4, 2002, the
Company issued a total of 2,921,450 and 1,328,550  shares of common stock to AJW
Partners,  LLC and New Millennium  Capital Partners II, LLC,  respectively  (See
Note 10(B)) for a total debt reduction of $100,343.

As of June 30,  2002 and June 30,  2001,  $100,407  and  $200,750 of 12% Secured
Convertible Debentures, respectively remain outstanding.

On August 26, 2002,  the Company issued its third set of shares to AJW Partners,
LLC  (1,460,725  shares) and New  Millennium  Capital  Partners II, LLC (664,275
shares). The final delivery of shares is due on or about October 21, 2002.

(B) CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP
--------------------------------

In  January  2002,  the  Company  issued,  in the  aggregate,  $1  million of 5%
Convertible Debentures to Cornell Capital Partners, LP and other investors.

These debentures are convertible into shares of common stock at a price equal to
either (a) an amount  equal to 120% of the closing bid price of the common stock
as of the closing date or $.40,  whichever is higher,  or (b) an amount equal to
80% of the lowest  closing  bid price of the common  stock for the five  trading
days immediately  preceding the conversion date.  These  convertible  debentures
accrue  interest at a rate of 5% per year and are  convertible  at the  holder's
option. These convertible  debentures have a term of two years. At the Company's
option,  these  debentures  may be paid in cash at maturity or redeemed at a 20%
premium prior to January 2004.

The convertible  debentures contain a beneficial  conversion feature computed at
its intrinsic value that is the difference  between the conversion price and the
fair value on the  debenture  issuance  date of the common  stock into which the
debt is  convertible,  multiplied by the number of shares into which the debt is
convertible at the commitment date. Since the beneficial  conversion  feature is
to be  settled by  issuing  equity,  the  amount  attributed  to the  beneficial
conversion  feature,  of  $250,000,  was  recorded as an interest  expense and a
component of equity on the issuance date.

The Company accrued $22,917 of interest as of June 30, 2002 on these debentures.

The Company  realized  $564,000 of net proceeds after  financing  fees,  closing
costs and the  repayment of the $325,000  ninety-day  short-term  note (See Note
6(D)).

The  Company  incurred  $80,000  of  financing  costs  associated  with  the  5%
Convertible  Debentures that is being amortized over the life of the debentures.
Amortization of $16,667 was expensed for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.

NOTE 8.  STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY
---------------------------------

On September  11, 2001,  the Company's  stockholders  authorized a change in the
Company's  Articles of  Incorporation  increasing  the  authorized  no par value

                                      F-14
<PAGE>

common  shares from  100,000,000  to  200,000,000  and  providing for a class of
25,000,000  $.01 par value shares of preferred  stock which will have such terms
as the Board of Directors  shall  determine  from time to time. A Certificate of
Amendment to the Company's  Articles of  Incorporation  incorporating  the above
changes was filed on September 27, 2001.

(A) PRIVATE PLACEMENT
---------------------

During  the  period of  December  2000 to  August  2001,  pursuant  to a private
placement,  the Company  issued  4,293,933  shares of common stock and 4,293,933
warrants at $.30 per share.  The Company  received  $1,288,180  from  investors,
which included  $250,000 for stock not yet issued as of June 30, 2001 (which was
subsequently  issued  during  the year  ended June 30,  2002) and  $275,454  for
warrants.

For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001,  the Company  issued
137,727  and  250,000  shares of common  stock,  valued at $75,000  and  $41,318
respectively,  in payment of offering costs incurred. The value assigned to this
stock was based on the private placement memorandum of $.30 per share. The value
of the common stock has been charged to equity as direct costs to the offering.

The fair market value of the warrants, aggregating $110,000 and $275,454 at June
30, 2002 and June 30, 2001, respectively,  was estimated on the grant date using
the  Black-Scholes  option  pricing  model as  required  under FASB 123 with the
following weighted average  assumptions:  expected dividend yield 0%, volatility
49.84%, risk-free interest rate 4.22%, expected option life 2 years. At June 30,
2002, no warrants have been exercised.

On February 27, 2002, the Company's Board of Directors  approved a resolution to
reprice the private  placement  offering  from $.30 per share to $.20 per share.
The Board of Directors  repriced these shares due the delay in  registering  the
shares sold to investors in such private placement.  The Company did not receive
any consideration for the repricing of the shares. The repricing resulted in the
additional  issuance of 2,146,967 of its restricted common stock and warrants to
the 23 investors that previously  subscribed to the Company's private placement.
The exercise price of the underlying warrants will remain at $.30 per share.

(B) EQUITY LINE OF CREDIT FACILITY
----------------------------------

On January 10,  2002,  the  Company  entered  into a $30 million  Equity Line of
Credit facility with Cornell Capital  Partners,  LP. Pursuant to the Equity Line
of Credit,  the Company may, at its discretion,  periodically  issue and sell to
Cornell Capital Partners,  LP shares of common stock for a total purchase of $30
million.  The amount of each advance is subject to an aggregate  monthly maximum
advance amount of $2 million in any 30-day period.  Cornell Capital Partners, LP
will purchase the shares of common stock for a 9% discount to the lowest closing
bid price of the Company's common stock during the 5 trading days after a notice
date. In addition,  Cornell Capital Partners,  LP will retain 3% of each advance
under the Equity  Line of Credit,  together  with a one-time  commitment  fee of
$740,000, paid in 2,960,000 shares of common stock. Cornell Capital Partners, LP
intends  to sell  any  shares  under  the  Equity  Line of  Credit  at the  then
prevailing market price. As of June 30, 2002, the Company has not drawn down any
funds on this line.

The Company has engaged Westrock Advisors, Inc., a registered broker-dealer,  to
advise it in connection with the Equity Line of Credit.  Westrock Advisors, Inc.
was paid a fee of 40,000 shares of the Company's  common stock,  which was equal
to $10,000 at a closing bid of $.25 on January 10, 2002.

For the fiscal  year ended June 30,  2002,  the  Company  recorded  amortization
expense of $187,500 in connection with the $750,000 two year commitment fees and
the  balance of $562,500  has been  recorded  as  deferred  commitment  fees and
classified as part of stockholders' deficiency (See Note 8(G)).

(C) STOCK ISSUED FOR SERVICES
-----------------------------

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, the Company issued  1,051,491 shares
of common stock for services.  The stock was valued based on the quoted  trading
price on the grant dates, which aggregated $328,870.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, the Company issued  6,334,679 shares
of restricted common stock for services valued at $667,634. The stock was valued
based on the quoted trading price on the grant dates.

                                      F-15
<PAGE>

(D) STOCK ISSUED FOR EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
-------------------------------------------

During the fiscal  years  ended June 30,  2002 and June 30,  2001,  the  Company
issued 6,597,000 and 1,190,000 shares of restricted  common stock  respectively,
to  Advanced  Communications  (Australia),  its vendors  and  employees  for the
partial extinguishment of debt. The stock was valued based on the quoted trading
price on the grant dates, which aggregated  $4,545,902 and $357,001 respectively
(See Note 6(B)).

(E) STOCK ISSUED TO DIRECTORS
-----------------------------

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, the Company issued 200,000 shares of
its  restricted  common  stock  having  a value of  $36,000  to each of its five
current  Directors for services  rendered to the Company as directors during the
two-year  period  ending  September  30,  2002.  The  Company  issued a total of
1,000,000  shares in the  aggregate  having a value of  $180,000.  The stock was
valued based on the quoted trading price of the Company's stock on the date that
the shares were granted to the individual directors.

(F) STOCK ISSUED IN SETTLEMENT OF LAWSUIT
-----------------------------------------

During the year ended June 30, 2002,  the Company  issued  320,000 shares of its
restricted  common stock having a value of $80,000 to the principals of WORLD IP
in full  settlement  of the WORLD IP  rescission  lawsuit.  The stock was valued
based on the quoted  trading price of the  Company's  stock on the date that the
shares were granted (See Note 10B).

(G) STOCK ISSUED FOR PLACEMENT FEES
-----------------------------------

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, the Company issued  2,960,000 shares
of its  restricted  common stock  having a value of $740,000 to Cornell  Capital
Partners,  LP as a one-time  commitment  fee in connection  with the $30 million
Equity Line of Credit  Agreement.  The stock was priced at the closing bid price
of $.25 per share on January 10, 2002.  In addition,  the Company  issued 40,000
shares of its  restricted  common  stock  having a value of $10,000 to  Westrock
Advisors,  Inc to advise it in  connection  with the Equity Line of Credit.  The
40,000  shares  were also priced at the closing bid price of $.25 on January 10,
2002.

(H) STOCK ISSUED FOR CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
-------------------------------------------

During the fiscal  years  ended June 30,  2002 and June 30,  2001,  the  Company
issued 1,803,545 and 4,250,000 shares of stock to the 12% Convertible  Debenture
holders in  extinguishments  of $412,800 and $100,343 of Convertible  Debentures
respectively (See Note 10B).

NOTE 9.  RELATED PARTIES
------------------------

(A) GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD
--------------------------------------------

Global  Communications  Technology Pty Ltd., a related party, is wholly owned by
Mr. May a principal stockholder of the Company (See Note 6(C)).

(B) ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (AUSTRALIA) PTY. LTD.
------------------------------------------------------------

Advanced Communications Technology (Australia) Pty. Ltd., an Australian company,
is 70% owned by Mr. May's wholly owned company, Global Communications Technology
Pty Ltd. Advanced Communications  Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd placed itself
into voluntary administration on or about July 18, 2002 (See Note 10B(iv)).

(C) LEGAL COUNSEL
-----------------

Certain of the  Company's  legal counsel are  stockholders  and directors of the
Company.

                                      F-16
<PAGE>

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
--------------------------------------

(A)      LEASE AGREEMENT
------------------------

The Company is a party to a three-year  office lease commencing  January 1, 2002
and ending  December 31, 2004. The monthly rent is $7,634  inclusive of the cost
of monthly  parking.  The minimum lease  payment for the  remaining  life of the
lease is $229,020.  On August 1, 2002, the Company notified the landlord that it
was relocating  its office from  California to New York. The Company has engaged
Grubb & Ellis to find a  suitable  subtenant  to assume  all or a portion of the
Company's remaining lease obligation.

The Company is a guarantor of Jason Webster's  one-year  residential lease which
expires  January 25,  2003.  The  Guaranty  which was  executed in January  2002
requires  the  Company to  reimburse  the  landlord in the event of a default by
Jason Webster,  the former Director of Corporate  Communications of the Company.
The rent under the  residential  lease is $1,600 per month.  The Company has not
been required to perform under the Guaranty.

(B)      LEGAL MATTERS
----------------------

(i) NANCY J. NEEDHAM AND EDMUND R. DUPONT LAWSUIT
-------------------------------------------------

In  Nancy  J.  Needham;  Edmund  R.  DuPont  et  al v.  Advanced  Communications
Technologies,  Inc., et al, an action filed July 2000 in the Fifteenth  Judicial
Circuit  in the State of  Florida,  two former  officers  and  directors  of the
Company are seeking  damages and injunctive  relief arising out of the Company's
refusal to provide legal opinion letters and to take other actions  necessary to
allow the former officers to convert  restricted stock into  unrestricted  stock
under an exemption  under Rule 144. The plaintiffs have not specified the amount
of damages they are seeking. The Company has filed a counterclaim to rescind all
of the  Plaintiffs'  stock for lack and/or  failure of  consideration  and other
damages.  In October 2001, the Court denied summary judgment for the Plaintiffs.
In July 2002 the court  denied the  Company's  motion to  dismiss.  The  Company
believes  that  it has  meritorious  defenses  to  the  suit  and is  vigorously
defending the litigation.

(ii)     WORLD IP INCORPORATED SETTLEMENT

In Advanced Communications  Technologies,  Inc., et al v. World IP Incorporated,
et al,  an  action  filed in the  Fifteenth  Judicial  Circuit  in the  State of
Florida,   the  Company  sued  World  IP  Incorporated,   its  subsidiaries  and
shareholders  (collectively,  "World")  for  breach  of  the  terms  of a  Stock
Subscription and Purchase Agreement between the parties dated November 10, 1999.
The parties entered into Settlement and Rescission Agreements, pursuant to which
all  transactions  between  the parties  including  the Stock  Subscription  and
Purchase Agreement,  the issuance of World stock to the Company and the issuance
of 500,000 shares of the Company's stock to World's  shareholders were rescinded
effective November 10, 1999. Further,  World's  shareholders were issued 320,000
shares of the Company's stock (See Note 8F) which will be registered pursuant to
the  Registration  Statement  currently  on file  with the  Securities  Exchange
Commission. The lawsuit was dismissed by a Court order dated January 29, 2002.

(iii) AJW PARTNERS, LLC AND NEW MILLENNIUM CAPITAL PARTNERS II, LLC

On April 24, 2002, the Company entered into a Settlement  Agreement with the two
remaining September 1999 Convertible  Debenture holders,  AJW Partners,  LLC and
New  Millennium  Capital  Partners  II, LLC.  Under the terms of the  Settlement
Agreement,  the Company is obligated to issue, over a 180 day period,  8,500,000
shares of its common stock in exchange  for the  dismissal of the lawsuit and in
satisfaction of the remaining  outstanding  principal and accrued interest.  The
Company had the  option,  until July 23,  2002,  to  substitute  cash in lieu of
shares.  On closing,  the Company  issued  1,460,725  and 664,275  shares of its
common stock to AJW Partners,  LLC and New Millennium  Capital Partners II, LLC,
respectively.  A  Stipulation  and Order of  Discontinuance  was filed  with and
Ordered  by the  court on April 25,  2002  (See  Note  7A).  On June 4, 2002 the
Company issued an additional 1,460,725 and 664,275 shares of common stock to AJW
Partners LLC and New Millennium Capital Partners,  II, LLC (See Notes 7(A) and 8
(H)).

(iv) ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS (AUSTRALIA)) LITIGATION

On December 6, 2001, Mr. Roger May, as Chairman and Chief  Executive  Officer of
Advanced Communications (Australia), sent a letter to the Company demanding full
payment  of all  amounts  due under the Stock  Purchase  Agreement  between  the
Company and Advanced Communications (Australia) (the "Stock Purchase Agreement).
This  letter  was  dated  six days  after Mr.  May was  removed  by the Board of
Directors of the Company from all  executive  capacities  including as President

                                      F-17
<PAGE>

and Chief Executive Officer.  Mr. May sent additional demand letters on December
11, 2001, and December 21, 2001. These demand letters threatened to exercise the
rights granted to Advanced  Communications  (Australia) under its constitutional
documents,  which include exercising Advanced Communications  (Australia)'s lien
over the shares  registered  in the name of the Company or declaring  that those
shares be forfeited.  The Company  believes that it has fully met its obligation
under the Stock Purchase Agreement, which states that payments are only required
to be paid to Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  from those funds  remaining
after deduction of reserves needed for current  operations,  working capital and
the  development  and  expansion of its  operations  and the  operations  of its
subsidiaries as determined by its Board of Directors.  At this time, the Company
does not have  sufficient  funds  available  to pay to  Advanced  Communications
(Australia).  On January 23,  2002,  the  Company  filed suit  against  Advanced
Communications  (Australia)  and Roger May in the  Supreme  Court of Victoria at
Melbourne, Australia to protect its investment.

On  January  23,  2002,  the Court  issued  an  interim  injunction  effectively
enjoining   and   prohibiting   Advanced    Communications    (Australia)   from
"transferring,  dealing with, charging,  diminishing,  mortgaging,  assigning or
disposing of" the Company's stock in Advanced  Communications  (Australia).  The
interim   injunction   was  recently   extended  by  the  court  until  a  final
determination is made at trial.

On March 15, 2002,  Advanced  Communications  (Australia) issued a press release
stating  that  EntrePort  Corporation  ("EntrePort"),  an AMEX  listed  company,
executed  "definitive  documents"  whereby  EntrePort  would  acquire a minority
interest in Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  and  Advanced  Communications
(Australia) would purchase a majority interest in EntrePort.  Further,  on March
14,  2002,  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  entered  into an  Acquisition
Agreement  with  EntrePort  (the  "Acquisition  Agreement")  which  stated  that
Advanced Communications (Australia) "now plans to locate and establish a base of
operations  in the United States for the  continued  development,  marketing and
distribution  of the  SpectruCell  product in the USA and  Canada.  Such base of
operations will involve the  establishment of engineering  facilities,  research
and development,  sales,  marketing and distribution." The Acquisition Agreement
also stated that EntrePort's  name would be changed to "Advanced  Communications
USA, Inc." Mr. May resigned from the Company's Board of Directors one day before
entering into the Acquisition Agreement.

The Company  believes that the  transaction  with  EntrePort as described in the
Acquisition  Agreement is inconsistent with the rights granted to it by Advanced
Communications  (Australia) in the License and Distribution Agreement dated July
5, 2000 pursuant to which the Company  received the  exclusive  rights to market
and distribute the SpectruCell  technology in North,  South and Central America.
The Company  therefore  instructed its  Australian  lawyers to write to Advanced
Communications  (Australia)  requesting an undertaking that it would not appoint
EntrePort  or  any  other  person  to  market  and  distribute  the  SpectruCell
technology  in the  exclusive  territory  in  breach of the  license  agreement.
Advanced Communications (Australia) refused to provide the undertaking sought by
the Company  and,  accordingly,  the  Company  applied to the Court for an order
restraining Advanced Communications  (Australia) from breaching the terms of the
license  agreement.  On April 26, 2002,  the Court issued an interim  order that
held  that  Advanced  Communications  (Australia),  whether  by itself or by its
officers,  employees,  agents,  attorneys  or any of  them  is  restrained  from
appointing or agreeing to appoint  EntrePort  Corporation or any other person to
distribute,  sell,  offer to sell or  supply  the  SpectruCell  product  and its
related  hardware in the U.S.,  and North and South  Americas  without the prior
written consent of the Company.

EntrePort was added as a defendant to the proceedings.

On May 7, 2002,  the Company  received a notice  alleging a breach from Advanced
Communications (Australia) stating that Advanced Communications had breached its
obligation under the License Agreement.  In addition,  on May 7, 2002,  Advanced
Communications  (Australia) sent a termination  notice formally  terminating the
License  Agreement.  The  Company  believes  that the  notice of breach  and the
termination  notice  are  without  merit and it is taking  the  necessary  legal
actions to prevent  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  from  terminating its
rights under the License Agreement.

On May 8, 2002, the Court extended its April 26, 2002 order further  restraining
Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  from  "acting  upon or taking any further
steps in reliance upon" the notice of breach and termination  notice. On May 27,
2002,  the court held a full  hearing on the  injunction  application,  took the
matter under  advisement  and indicated  that it would rule on the matter in the
near future.

A dispute also arose between Advanced Communication  (Australia) and the Company
as to whether the Company's  SpectruCell license included military  applications
as  well  as  commercial  applications.  Contrary  to  previous  statements  and
understandings,  Advanced Communications  (Australia) claimed for the first time
in or about March 2002 that military  applications  were not included  under the
Company's  SpectruCell  license, and that these rights were exclusively reserved
to Advanced Communications (Australia). A dispute also arose between the parties
as to whether the Company's  SpectruCell  license included  marketing rights, in
addition  to   distribution   rights.   Contrary  to  previous   statement   and
understandings,  Advanced Communications  (Australia) claimed for the first time

                                      F-18
<PAGE>

in or about March 2002 that the  Company's  SpectruCell  license did not include
marketing  rights,  and that these rights were exclusively  reserved to Advanced
Communications (Australia).

The Company disputed these claims and requested the court to expand the existing
injunctions  against Advanced  Communications  (Australia) to include  marketing
rights and military  applications  of  SpectruCell  technology  in the Exclusive
Territory and to continue the existing  injunctions in effect until the trial on
the case.

The marketing and military applications rights were relevant because the Company
had been  contacted  by a major U.S.  defense  contractor  that was bidding on a
large U.S.  Army project that  involved a  SpectruCell-type  component  that the
contractor  wanted the Company to provide for the project.  The Company was also
contacted at this time by another U.S. defense-related company regarding similar
products.  It was also relevant because it had become apparent that the best way
to generate  short term  revenues for  SpectruCell-related  products was through
military  applications  which were easier and less expensive to produce than the
technically  much more  sophisticated  commercial  products  being  designed for
public telephone system use.

The above-mentioned matters were argued before the court at a two-day hearing on
May 27 and 28, 2002. The court took the matters under submission.  On August 23,
2002,  the court  issued its  ruling in which the judge  held that all  activity
related to SpectruCell  in the Exclusive  Territory  pending the trial,  will be
carried out by the Company and not Advanced Communications (Australia).

Based  on  this  conclusion,   the  court  issued  a  comprehensive  preliminary
injunction  granting all the relief  sought by the Company.  Among other things,
the  injunction  prohibits  Advanced  Communications  (Australia),  directly  or
indirectly,  from taking any action in the Exclusive  Territory  with respect to
marketing,  distributing,  selling or  otherwise  dealing  with the  SpectruCell
technology  (including the military  applications  thereof),  except through and
with the prior written consent of the Company.

The court's  order also  prohibited  Advanced  Communications  (Australia)  from
licensing,  marketing,  distributing,  selling  or  otherwise  dealing  with the
SpectruCell technology, including military applications of the product, and from
offering to do any of the  foregoing,  in the  Exclusive  Territory  through any
third party without the Company's prior written consent.  The court's order also
prohibited Advanced  Communications  (Australia) from entering into a license or
sub-license agreement to market, distribute,  sell, provide promotional material
or  otherwise  deal  with  the  SpectruCell   technology,   including   military
applications thereof, in the Exclusive Territory except to the company or at its
request. The court's order also prohibited Advanced  Communications  (Australia)
from  granting any license to any third party to use,  sub-license  or reproduce
the product in the Exclusive Territory, except at the request of the Company.

The  court's  order will  remain in effect  until the trial on the merits in the
case.  Simultaneously  with making the above-described  order,  because Advanced
Communications (Australia)'s administrator indicated that he had no intention of
proceeding with the litigation at this time, the court ordered the proceeding to
be taken off the fast-track "Commercial List" and returned to the regular track.
According to the Company's Australian counsel, this means that the case will not
proceed  to trial for well  over one year.  At the  present  time the  action is
stayed because of the administration proceeding in which Advanced Communications
(Australia) is involved and the above-mentioned injunctions remain in effect.

(v) STAR MULTICARE SERVICES, INC.

In STAR MULTI CARE SERVICES, INC. v. ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
an action filed  September  18, 2000 in the  Fifteenth  Judicial  Circuit in the
State of Florida,  Star Multi Care Services,  Inc. ("Star") sued the Company for
alleged breach of contract and the recovery of a break-up or termination  fee in
excess  of  $50,000  in  conjunction  with  the  Company's  alleged  failure  to
consummate a proposed  merger with Star in January  2000.  The Company  believes
that the suit is without basis and is vigorously defending the alleged claim.

NOTE 11. GOING CONCERN
----------------------

The Company's  consolidated  financial statements for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2002, have been prepared on a going concern basis,  which  contemplates  the
realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities  and  commitments in the
normal course of business.  The Company's net loss of $4,332,693  for the fiscal
year  ended  June  30,  2002,  working  capital  deficiency  of  $3,252,693  and
stockholders'  deficiency  of  $4,940,050,  raise  substantial  doubt  about its
ability to continue as a going concern.

                                      F-19
<PAGE>

The ability of the Company to continue as a going  concern is  dependent  on the
Company's  ability to raise additional  capital and implement its business plan.
Management  anticipates that the issuance of securities will generate sufficient
resources for the continuation of the Company's operations (See Note 8B).

Based on the Company's  loss from  operations,  working  capital  deficiency and
stockholders' deficiency,  there is doubt regarding its ability to continue as a
going concern. Of the $4,332,693 loss incurred during the fiscal year ended June
30, 2002,  $3,229,439 was non-cash, a major portion of which was a non-recurring
charge for the  impairment  of a long-lived  asset.  Cash required by operations
amounted to $1,103,254. The Company raised $1,459,206 by issuing stock and debt.
Management is of the opinion that funds for the next fiscal year can be obtained
by  issuing  additional  stock  and debt.  Management  anticipates  that  future
operations will generate sufficient cash to offset operating expense.

The consolidated  financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

NOTE 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
--------------------------

         On  September  7, 2002,  a September  7, 2001 Letter of Intent that the
Company entered into with Advanced Communications  (Australia) to acquire all of
the intellectual property, including the worldwide rights (other than the rights
to  territories  that the  Company  currently  possess)  for the  licensing  and
distribution of the SpectruCell product expired.


                                      F-20