alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the Annual Report of Crescent  Moon,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the period ending February 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Robert  Denome,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert P. Denome
Robert P. Denome
President and Director
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


November 19, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000001923
<NAME> ABRAMS INDUSTRIES INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                      11,920,837
<SECURITIES>                                 3,564,766
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,439,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                   130,534
<INVENTORY>                                  1,489,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,151,286
<PP&E>                                      80,327,476
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,902,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             112,517,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,113,581
<BONDS>                                     44,757,363
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,014,039
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,737,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               112,517,224
<SALES>                                    134,011,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           134,520,330
<CGS>                                      117,096,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              117,096,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,938,019
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                64,950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,436,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,984,353
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,887,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,097,353
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        

</TABLE>
§ 230.7 Actions normally requiring an Environmental Assessment (EA) but not necessarily an EIS. Actions normally requiring an EA, but not an EIS, are listed below: ( a ) *Regulatory Actions.* Most permits will normally require only an EA.
( b ) *Authorized Projects and Projects Under Construction.* Changes which may be approved under the discretionary authority of the Secretary of the Army.
( c ) *Continuing Authorities Program.* Projects recommended for approval of the Chief of Engineers under the following authorities: ( 1 ) Section 205, Small Flood Control Authority;
( 2 ) Section 208, Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control Authority;
( 3 ) Section 107, Small Navigation Project Authority;
( 4 ) Section 103, Small Beach Erosion Control Project Authority; and
( 5 ) Section 111, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects.
( d ) *Construction and Operations and Maintenance.* Changes in environmental impacts which were not considered in the project EIS or EA. Examples are changes in pool level operations, use of new disposal areas, location of bank protection works, etc.
( e ) *Real Estate Management and Disposal Actions.* ( 1 ) Disposal of a Civil Works project or portions of project properties not reported as excess to the General Services Administration.
( 2 ) Disposal of real property for public port and industrial purposes.
( 3 ) Grants of leases or easements for other than minor oil and gas transmission lines, electric power transmission lines, road and highway rights-of-way, and sewage or water treatment facilities and land fills.
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  List of Agency Interests and Resources

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/List of Agency Interests and Resources List of Agency Interests and ResourcesADR2022-02-17T19:20:38-05:00
			
			List of Agency Interests and ResourcesA Federal Agency has many interests and resources that are common in all contracts.
Interests:
Ensure timely performance of a contract because [____fill in the blank ____];
Save taxpayer money;
Obligate appropriated funds before they expire;
Comply with Agency policy and regulations;
Create a defensible file to withstand public scrutiny;
Further the mission of the Agency;
Ensure public confidence in the Agency;Resources:
Funds;
Contractual authority (e.g., right to terminate for convenience, order changes, issue stop work orders, etc.);
Statutory and Regulatory authority (e.g., authority to issue sole-source awards in certain circumstances, authority to settle, etc.);
Alternative sources of supplies or services;
Audit capabilities;
Contractor’s payment and performance bonds;
Skilled employees (tradesmen, engineers, attorneys, contracting specialists, etc.);Each contract or project also may present unique interests and resources to add to these standard items. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.130 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) The Director of the Federal Register approves certain material that is incorporated by reference into this subpart under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the Coast Guard must publish notice of the change in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. You may inspect all material at the Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Standards, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. The material is also available at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and from the source listed in paragraph (b) of this section. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) The material approved for incorporation by reference in this subpart and the sections affected are as follows:
*American National Standards Institute (ANSI)*—11 West 42nd St., New York, NY 10036. ANSI/ASQC Q9001-1994, Quality Systems—Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation, and Servicing, 1994—96.430 *International Maritime Organization IMO*—4 Albert Embankment, London, SE1 7SR, United Kingdom. Resolution A.741(18), International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, November 4, 1993—96.220, 96.370 Resolution A.788 (19), Guidelines on Implementation of the International Safety Management (ISM) Code by Administrations, November 23, 1995—96.320, 96.440 Resolution A.739(18), Guidelines for the Authorization of Organizations Acting on Behalf of the Administration, November 4, 1993—96.440
[CGD 95-073, 62 FR 67506, Dec. 24, 1997, as amended at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004]
NOTE: This disposit ion is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1043

CHARLES L. EKSTAM,

FUEL PREPORATOR IN TERNATIONAL, INC.,

and EKSTAM WORLDWIDE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

C. BRAD EKSTAM,

DIESEL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC.,

and C. BRAD EKSTAM (doing business as Diesel Performance Products Co.),

Defendants-Appellees.

Michael J. Thomas , Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P. L.C., of St. Louis, Missouri,

argued for plaintiffs-appellant s. With him on the brief was Kara R. Yancey

.

James J. Kernell , Erickson, Kernell, Derusseau & Kleypas, LLC, of Overland

Park, Kansas, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Lara L.

McInerney and Michael Yakimo, Jr.

Appealed from: United States District Cour t for the Eastern District of Missouri

Magistrate Judge Audrey G. FleissigNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1043

CHARLES L. EKSTAM,

FUEL PREPORATOR IN TERNATIONAL, INC.,

and EKSTAM WORLDWIDE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

C. BRAD EKSTAM,

DIESEL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, INC.,

and C. BRAD EKSTAM (doing business as Diesel Performance Products Co.),

Defendants-Appellees.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District C ourt for the Eastern Dis trict of Missouri

in CASE NO(S). 4:04-CV-00187

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge , LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED July 14, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
/**
 * @file
 * better_exposed_filters.js
 *
 * Provides some client-side functionality for the Better Exposed Filters module.
 */

(function ($, Drupal, drupalSettings) {
  Drupal.behaviors.betterExposedFilters = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {
      // Add highlight class to checked checkboxes for better theming.
      $('.bef-tree input[type=checkbox], .bef-checkboxes input[type=checkbox]')
        // Highlight newly selected checkboxes.
        .change(function () {
          _bef_highlight(this, context);
        })
        .filter(':checked').closest('.form-item', context).addClass('highlight');
    }
  };

  /*
   * Helper functions
   */

  /**
   * Adds/Removes the highlight class from the form-item div as appropriate.
   */
  function _bef_highlight(elem, context) {
    $elem = $(elem, context);
    $elem.attr('checked')
      ? $elem.closest('.form-item', context).addClass('highlight')
      : $elem.closest('.form-item', context).removeClass('highlight');
  }

})(jQuery, Drupal, drupalSettings);
§ 266.2 Responsibility. ( a ) *Privacy and Records Management Office.* The Privacy and Records Management Office will ensure Postal Service-wide compliance with this part.
( b ) *Records Custodian.* Records Custodians are responsible for adherence to this part within their respective units, and in particular for affording individuals their rights to inspect and obtain copies of records concerning them.
( c ) *Corporate Information Security Office.* This office is responsible for ensuring compliance with information security policies, including protection of information resources containing customer, employee, or other individuals' information; developing policy for safeguarding and disposing of electronic records (including emails) that are maintained in information systems (including those that are subject to legal holds); serving as the central contact for information security issues; preventing and engaging in some investigation of cybercrime and misuse of Postal Service information technology resources; and providing security consultation as requested.
( d ) *Data Integrity Board* — ( 1 ) *Responsibilities.* The Data Integrity Board oversees Postal Service computer matching activities. The Board's principal function is to review, approve, and maintain all written agreements for use of Postal Service records in matching programs to ensure compliance with the Privacy Act and all relevant statutes, regulations, and guidelines. In addition, the Board annually: Reviews matching programs and other matching activities in which the Postal Service has participated during the preceding year to determine compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and agreements; compiles a biennial matching report of matching activities; and performs review and advice functions relating to record accuracy, recordkeeping and disposal practices, and other computer matching activities.
( 2 ) *Composition.* The Privacy Act requires that the senior official responsible for implementation of agency Privacy Act policy and the Inspector General serve on the Board. The Chief Privacy and Records Management Officer, as administrator of Postal Service Privacy Act policy, serves as Secretary of the Board and performs the administrative functions of the Board. The Board is composed of these and other members designated by the Postmaster General, as follows: ( i ) General Counsel and Executive Vice President (Chairman).
( ii ) Chief Postal Inspector.
( iii ) Inspector General.
( iv ) Chief Human Resources Officer and Executive Vice President.
( v ) Chief Privacy and Records Management Officer.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), David L. Yowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ David L. Yowan
|Name:              |  | David L. Yowan         
|Title:             |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:              |  | May 7, 2008            

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or
as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. 34,877

5 EARNEST FROLICK, 

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY

8 John A. Dean Jr., District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

10 Maris Veidemanis, Assistant Attorney General

11 Santa Fe, NM

12 for Appellee

13 Jorge A. Alvarado, Chief Public Defender

14 Stephen Taylor, Assistant Public Defender

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 for Appellant

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 SUTIN, Judge.
2

1 {1} Defendant Earnest Frolick appeals from his conviction for one count of

2 distribution of a controlled substance contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-

3 22(A)(2)(a) (2011). On appeal, Defendant contends that the district court erred in

4 denying his request that the jury be instructed on objective entrapment. See UJI 14-

5 5161 NMRA. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to agree with Defendant

6 and proposing to reverse and remand for a new trial. [CN 6] The State has filed a

7 response to this Court’s notice of proposed disposition informing this Court that, after

8 due consideration, it will not be filing a memorandum in opposition to our notice.

9 Accordingly, for the reasons stated in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, we

10 reverse Defendant’s conviction and remand to the district court for a new trial. 

11 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 __________________________________

13 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

14 WE CONCUR:

15 _______________________________

16 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

17 _______________________________

18 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

d0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138119(20) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138119 

 COA: 288457 

Cheboygan CC: 00-002240-FC 

BOBBY LURAY REDDELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2009 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

          - [RI 25-41]

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised information collection. RI 25-41, Initial Certification of Full-Time School Attendance, is used to determine whether a child is unmarried and a full-time student in a recognized school. OPM must determine this in order to pay survivor annuity benefits to children who are age 18 or older. 

Approximately 1,200 RI 25-41 forms are completed annually. It takes approximately 90 minutes to complete the form. The annual burden is 1,800 hours. 

For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, or E-mail to mbtoomey@opm.gov. 

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received on or before July 10, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to— 

Ronald W. Melton, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 3349A, Washington, DC 20415-3540

  and 

Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management & Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503 

# FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION—CONTACT: 

Donna G. Lease, Team Leader, 

Forms Analysis and Design, 

(202) 606-0623 

Office of Personnel Management. 

Janice R. Lachance, 

Director.

[FR Doc. 00-14626 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-01-U
H. R. 5193

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To amend the National Housing Act to temporarily extend the applicability of

the downpayment simplification provisions for the FHA single family housing

mortgage insurance program.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Downpayment Simplification

Extension Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF APPLICABILITY OF DOWNPAYMENT SIMPLIFICATION PROVISIONS.

Subparagraph (A) of section 203(b)(10) of the National Housing

Act (12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(10)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘executed

for insurance in fiscal years 1998, 1999, and 2000’’ and inserting

‘‘closed on or before October 30, 2000’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Wesley V. PATTERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 16096.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 1, 1958.

Richard Meyers, St. Paul, Minn., for appellant.

Fallon Kelly, U. S. Atty., South St. Paul, Minn., and Mr. Kenneth G. Owens, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed for want of prosecution, on motion of appellee.