UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cr-20326-MOORE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ANDRE LORQUET,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CHANGE OF PLEA

THIS CAUSE is before the Court following an Order of Reference to conduct a proceeding 

for acceptance of a guilty plea by Defendant Andre Lorquet. Based upon the change of plea hearing 

conducted on January 24, 2023, this Court makes the following findings, and recommends that the 

guilty plea be accepted.

The undersigned advised Defendant of his right to have these proceedings conducted by 

the District Judge assigned to the case, and that this Court was conducting the change of plea 

hearing pursuant to an Order of Reference from the District Court. I further advised Defendant that 

the District Judge assigned to this case would be the sentencing judge and would make all findings 

and rulings concerning Defendant’s sentence. I advised Defendant that he did not have to permit 

the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge to conduct this hearing and could request that the 

change of plea hearing be conducted by the District Judge assigned to the case. Defendant, 

Defendant’s attorney and the Assistant United States Attorney all consented on the record to the 

undersigned conducting the change of plea hearing.

The plea colloquy was conducted in accordance with the outline set forth in the Bench 

Book for District Judges, and in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11.

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2023 Page 1 of 3
Defendant pled guilty to Count 7 of the indictment, which charges him with money 

laundering, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957; and Count 9, which charges 

him with aggravated identity theft in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A. I 

advised Defendant that the maximum sentence the Court could impose on Count 7 is a term of ten 

years imprisonment; followed by a term of supervised release of up to three years; and on Count 

9, the Court must impose a term of imprisonment of two years to run consecutive to any other 

sentence; followed by a term of supervised release of up to one year. I further advised the 

Defendant that the Court may impose a fine of up to $250,000 per count; and a mandatory special 

assessment of $100.00 per count, which Defendant has agreed is due to be paid at the time of 

sentencing. Defendant was also advised of the possibility of restitution, forfeiture, and the potential 

for immigration consequences including deportation. Defendant acknowledged that he understood 

the possible maximum penalties that could be imposed in the case.

To set forth the factual basis for the entry of the plea, the Government proffered the facts 

it would have established at trial. The Government established all the essential elements of the 

crime to which Defendant is pleading guilty. Defendant acknowledged that the facts proffered by 

the Government were accurate, and defense counsel agreed that the proffer satisfied all elements 

of the crime charged.

The parties entered into a written plea agreement that was thereafter filed with the Court.

I reviewed that plea agreement on the record and Defendant acknowledged that he had reviewed 

the entire agreement with counsel before he signed it. Defendant acknowledged that he is satisfied 

with his attorney and that he has had a full opportunity to discuss all facets of his case with his 

attorney. Defendant indicated that he has reviewed discovery with counsel. 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2023 Page 2 of 3
Based upon all of the foregoing and the plea colloquy conducted by this Court, the 

undersigned finds that Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea, that 

Defendant is aware of the nature of the charges and the consequences of the plea, and that the plea 

of guilty is a knowing and voluntary plea supported by an independent basis in fact containing 

each of the essential elements of the offense.

Therefore, the undersigned recommends that Defendant be found to have freely and 

voluntarily entered his guilty plea to Counts 7 and 9 of the indictment filed in this case, as more 

particularly described herein, and that Defendant be adjudicated guilty of the offenses as charged.

In addition, the undersigned specifically finds that the Defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal 

his sentence in this case is knowing and voluntary.

A pre-sentence investigation report is being prepared for the District Court by the United 

States Probation Office. The sentencing will be set by separate order.

The parties will have fourteen calendar days from the date of service of this Report and 

Recommendation within which to file written objections, if any, for consideration by the United 

States District Judge. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b), Eleventh Circuit Rule 3-1, and 

accompanying Internal Operating Procedure 3, the parties are hereby notified that failure to object 

in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to challenge on appeal the District 

Court’s order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 

140 (1985).

Respectfully submitted in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 24th day of January, 2023.

________________________________

LAUREN F. LOUIS 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/24/2023 Page 3 of 3