alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

          - 41 CFR Chapter 301
          - [FTR Amendment 87]
          - RIN 3090-AH18

# AGENCY:

Office of Governmentwide Policy, GSA.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects entries listed in the prescribed maximum per diem rates for locations within the continental United States (CONUS) contained in a final rule appearing in part III of the                         **Federal Register**                         of Thursday, December 2, 1999 (64 FR 67670). The rule, among other things, increased/decreased the maximum lodging amounts in certain existing per diem localities, added new per diem localities, and removed a number of previously designated per diem localities. A correction published on Friday, May 19, 2000 (65 FR 31823), corrected the seasonal dates and lodging rates for Aspen, Colorado but failed to show changes this caused in the amounts of the maximum per diem rates.                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

January 1, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joddy P. Garner, Office of Governmentwide Policy (MTT), Washington, DC 20405; telephone 202-501-4857.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In rule document 00-12340 beginning on page 31823 in the issue of Friday, May 19, 2000 make the following corrections:

## Appendix A to Chapter 301 [Corrected]

On page 31825, under the State of Colorado, city of Aspen, the maximum per diem rates in column five are corrected as follows:

1. For the entry “April 1-May 31,” correct “186” to read “114”.

2. For the entry “June 1-December 31,” correct “114” to read “186”.

Page 31825, as corrected, reads as follows:

## Appendix A to Chapter 301—Prescribed Maximum Per Diem Rates for CONUS

* * * * *
      ( print page 37054)    
      ( print page 37055)    
Dated: June 7, 2000.

James L. Harte,

Travel Team Leader, Travel Management Policy Division. 

BILLING CODE 6820-34-P

[FR Doc. 00-14796  Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-34-C
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23186-CV-WILLIAMS

AUTUMN HAGLE,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROYAL CARIBBEAN

CRUISES, LTD., et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid’s Report 

and Recommendation (DE 38) (“Report”) on the Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Default filed 

by Defendant Intercruises Shoreside & Port Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) (DE 16)

(“Motion”). The other parties to this action do not oppose the relief requested in the 

Motion. In the Report, Judge Reid recommends that the Motion be granted. (DE 38 at 

1.) No objections were filed to the Report, and the time to object has passed.

Upon a careful review of the Report, the Motion, the record, and applicable law,

it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. Judge Reid’s Report (DE 38) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Default (DE 16) is GRANTED.

3. The Clerk’s default entered on December 2, 2022 (DE 14) is VACATED.

4. Defendant Intercruises Shoreside & Port Services, Inc. shall file a 

response or answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint (DE 1) on or before May 11, 

2023. 

Case 1:22-cv-23186-KMW Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2023 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 30th day

of April, 2023.

Case 1:22-cv-23186-KMW Document 43 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Thomas F. Rose, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Regeneration Technologies, Inc., hereby certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Regeneration Technologies, Inc.;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 29, 2005



/s/ Thomas F. RoseName:

Thomas F. RoseTitle:

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4888 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4888

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                     To protect innocent children.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4888

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                     To protect innocent children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Innocent Child Protection Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF INNOCENT CHILDREN.

    It shall be unlawful for any authority, military or civil, of the 
United States, a State, or any district, possession, commonwealth or 
other territory under the authority of the United States to carry out a 
sentence of death on a woman while she carries a child in utero. In 
this section, the term ``child in utero'' means a member of the species 
homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 25, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Danielle Holland) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Danielle Holland.

Dated this 12th day of July 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2023 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1884
BRUCE A. CRENSHAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WAREHOUSE EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 322, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-794) Submitted: November 14, 2003 Decided: December 16, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce A. Crenshaw, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Gans Axelrod, BEINS, AXELROD, KRAFT, GLEASON & GIBSON, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Bruce A. Crenshaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322 , No. CA-02-794 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION                           
| |                                                     
| |                                                     
| | /s/ WILLIAMP. KELLY                                 
| | William P. Kelly                                    
| | Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

November 2, 2006
§ 80.110 Casco Bay, ME. ( a ) A line drawn from the southwesternmost extremity of Bald Head at Cape Small to the southeasternmost extremity of Ragged Island; thence to the southern tangent of Jaquish Island thence to Little Mark Island Monument Light; thence to the northernmost extremity of Jewell Island.
( b ) A line drawn from the tower on Jewell Island charted in approximate position latitude 43°40.6′ N., longitude 70°05.9′ W. to the northeasternmost extremity of Outer Green Island.
( c ) A Line drawn from the southwesternmost extremity of Outer Green Island to Ram Island Ledge Light; thence to Portland Head Light.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39171, July 1, 2013]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobertC. Caller, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date:  February 6,2009

 
| /s/Robert C. Caller                                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Caller                                                |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                                   |   |

 

----
§ 168.50 Performance and operational requirements. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of § 168.10, at all times during the escort transit each tanker to which this part applies: ( 1 ) Must be accompanied by escort vessels that meet the performance requirements of paragraph (b) of this section (but not less than the number of escorts required by § 168.40).
( 2 ) Must have the escort vessels positioned relative to the tanker such that timely response to a propulsion or steering failure can be effected.
( 3 ) Must not exceed a speed beyond which the escort vessels can reasonably be expected to safely bring the tanker under control within the navigational limits of the waterway, taking into consideration ambient sea and weather conditions, surrounding vessel traffic, hazards, and other factors that may reduce the available sea room.
( b ) The escort vessels, acting singly or jointly in any combination as needed, and considering their applied force vectors on the tanker's hull, must be capable of— ( 1 ) Towing the tanker at 4 knots in calm conditions, and holding it in steady position against a 45-knot headwind;
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) Holding the tanker on a steady course against a 35-degree locked rudder at a speed of 6 knots; and
( 4 ) Turning the tanker 90 degrees, assuming a free-swinging rudder and a speed of 6 knots, within the same distance (advance and transfer) that it could turn itself with a hard-over rudder.
[CGD 91-202, 59 FR 42968, Aug. 19, 1994, as amended at 70 FR 55730, Sept. 23, 2005]
EXHIBIT
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**






In
      connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of AMERCO
      (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      November 7, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Shoen, Chairman of the Board and
      President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:






(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and






(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







AMERCO,




a
      Nevada
      corporation





/s/
      Edward J.
      Shoen


Edward
      J.
      Shoen


President
      and Chairman of the Board


Date:  November
      7, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT PIERCE DIVISION

Case Number: 22-14267-CIV-MARTINEZ/MAYNARD

ALAN GROCHOWSKI, on behalf of himself 

and all other persons similarly situated.

Plaintiff,

v.

SAFE HOME SECURITY, INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the parties’ Joint Notice of Settlement, (ECF 

No. 16), which states that this case has been settled in full. Accordingly, it is:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The parties shall file either a Notice of Dismissal (if the Defendant has not served 

an answer or motion for summary judgment) or a Stipulation of Dismissal (signed by all parties 

who have appeared in this action), which must be filed with the Clerk of the Court; a proposed 

Order of Dismissal or Final Judgment; and any other documents necessary to conclude this action

on or before October 20, 2022. See Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1280 

(11th Cir. 2012).

2. If the parties fail to comply with this Order, the Court shall dismissthis case without 

prejudice without any further warning. 

3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to DENY ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT.

4. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case for statistical 

purposes only. This shall not affect the substantive rights of the parties.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 20th day of September, 2022.

____________________________________

JOSE E. MARTINEZ

Copies provided to: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

All Counsel of Record

Case 2:22-cv-14267-JEM Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2022 Page 1 of 1
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No. 07 - 17 - 00 200 - CV

________________________ ENDOSCOPY GP, LLC AND AMARILLO ENDOSCOPY CENTER, L.P. , APPELLANT S V. AMERIPRIDE SERVICES, INC. , APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Potter C ounty, Texas Trial Court No. 105786 - 2 ; Honorable Pamela Cook Sirmon , Presiding July 17 , 201 7 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. P ending before this c ourt is Appellants’ Joint Motion to Set Aside the Trial Court’s Judgment and Remand to Trial Court of Appellant s , Endoscopy GP, LLC and Amarillo Endoscopy Center, L.P. , and Appellee, Ameripride Services, Inc. In their joint motion, the parties request that we set aside the trial court’s judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of a judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement .2

To accord the trial court with jurisdiction to accomplish the relief requested by the parties and effectuate t he ir agreement, we grant the motion and, without passing on the merits of the appeal, set aside the trial court’s judgment, and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties . See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Pursuant to the motion, all costs on appeal s hould be taxed against the parties incurring them. Id . at 42.1(d). Having set aside the judgment at the request of the parties, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate w ill issue forthwith. Per Curiam
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ROBERT DUBOICE,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS 

COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 81 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-3407]


General Electric Company Industrial Systems, Tell City, IN; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
September 7, 1999 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers 
at General Electric Company, Industrial Systems, Tell City, IN.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
remains in effect (NAFTA-3377). Consequently, further investigation in 
this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been 
terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 22nd day of December, 1999.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-147 Filed 1-4-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.3





Amendment to Non-Employee Director Compensation Program - Increase to Annual Cash Retainer 


In connection with the periodic review of our non-employee director compensation program, effective as of July 23, 2019, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Las Vegas Sands Corp. (the “Company”) approved an increase in the annual cash retainer paid to our non-employee directors from $100,000 to $150,000, provided that such $50,000 increase in the annual cash retainer will not result in a corresponding increase in the automatic annual grants of restricted stock to our non-employee directors under Section 9(f) of the Company’s Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Award Plan.  For the avoidance of doubt, no changes were made at this time to the annual grants of restricted stock or the meeting fees and committee retainers provided to our non-employee directors.
From: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

 To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

 

 Cc: Amy Branning/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Higgins, Cortney" 

<Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>, Paula VanLare/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve 

 Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Raymond, Gabrielle" <graymond@rti.org>, 

"Marinshaw, Richard" <rjmarinshaw@rti.org> 

 

 Date: 12/06/2010 1:58 PM 

 

 Subject: Re: Gold Mines MACT Standard - costs documents, etc.... 

Hi Heidi,

 Attached are 2 Federal Register Notices (a proposed and final

rule) that explain the Title V criteria and some previous decisions.

 Please let me know if you have comments or questions.

 Thank You.

 Chuck

(See attached file: area source exemption proposed 2005.pdf)

(See attached file: area source exemption 121905.pdf)
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15250 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15251 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15252 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15253 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15254 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15255 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15256 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15257 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15258 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15259 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15260 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15261 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15262 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15263 2005
HeinOnline -- 70 Fed. Reg. 15264 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75320 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75321 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75322 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75323 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75324 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75325 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75326 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75327 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75328 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75329 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75330 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75331 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75332 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75333 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75334 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75335 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75336 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75337 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75338 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75339 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75340 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75341 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75342 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75343 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75344 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75345 2005
HeinOnline 70 Fed. Reg. 75346 2005