alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 144.30-5 Exposure suits. Each foreign MODU must meet the requirements of § 144.20-5 of this chapter, except as follows: ( a ) Exposure suits (immersion suits, survival suits, etc.) approved by the nation under which the MODU is documented may be used in lieu of suits approved under 46 CFR 160.071, provided that they are accepted by the Commandant as providing equivalent thermal protection to the wearer. (Requests for acceptance of such suits should be sent to Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509, along with technical data supporting the thermal performance of the suits.)
( b ) Personal flotation device lights approved by the nation under which the MODU is documented may be used in lieu of lights approved under 46 CFR 161.012.
[CGD 82-075b, 49 FR 4377, Feb. 6, 1984, as amended by CGD 88-052, 53 FR 25121, July 1, 1988; CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33665, June 28, 1996; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36283, June 25, 2010; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38435, July 7, 2014]
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5193

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 19, 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs

AN ACT

To amend the National Housing Act to temporarily extend

the applicability of the downpayment simplification provisions for the FHA single family housing mortgage insurance program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 5193 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Downpayment

3 Simplification Extension Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF APPLICABILITY OF DOWNPAYMENT

5 SIMPLIFICATION PROVISIONS.

6 Subparagraph (A) of section 203(b)(10) of the Na7 tional Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709(b)(10)(A)) is amend8 ed by striking ‘‘executed for insurance in fiscal years

9 1998, 1999, and 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘closed on or before

10 October 30, 2000’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5026 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5026

             To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

Mr. DeMint (for himself, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Ballenger, and 
Mr. Hoekstra) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. STATE MINIMUM WAGE.

    Section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h)(1) An employer in a State that adopts minimum wage 
legislation that conforms to the requirement of paragraph (2) shall not 
be required to pay its employees at the minimum wage prescribed by 
subsection (a)(1).
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall apply in a State that adopts minimum wage 
legislation that--
            ``(A) sets a rate or rates that are not less than $5.15 an 
        hour; and
            ``(B) applies that rate or those rates to not fewer than 
        the employees performing work within the State that would 
        otherwise be covered by the minimum wage rate prescribed by 
        subsection (a)(1).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc.(the
"Company"). for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Christopher Ryan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  * the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/ Christopher
Ryan
 Christopher
Ryan
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 
 Date:
December 1, 2008
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
###### Editorial Note on Part 67

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

#### § 67.40-10 Communication with owner.

Communication with the owners of private aids to navigation by the District Commander shall be addressed to their usual or last known place of business, or to their local representative, if any. Communication shall be by the method considered appropriate for the circumstances.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****In-vehicle display icons andother information elements [electronic resource].**
 
pt1|pt2
 
SuDoc Number:TD 2.30:03-063; TD 2.30:03-065

Item Number:0982-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001064322

 
July 18, 2018
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5023

To promote Israel’s role in the international community.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. CROWLEY (for himself and Mrs. LOWEY) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To promote Israel’s role in the international community.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Israel Diplomatic Rela5 tions Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress makes the following findings:

8 (1) Israel is a friend and ally of the United

9 States whose security is vital to regional stability

10 and United States interests.

11 (2) Israel currently maintains diplomatic rela12 tions with 162 countries. Approximately 25 coun-
2

•HR 5023 IH

1 tries do not have any diplomatic relations with

2 Israel, and another 4 countries have only limited re3 lations.

4 (3) The Government of Israel has been actively

5 seeking to establish formal relations with a number

6 of countries.

7 (4) The United States should assist its ally,

8 Israel, in its efforts to establish diplomatic relations.

9 (5) After 52 years of existence, Israel deserves

10 to be treated as an equal nation by its neighbors and

11 the world community.

12 SEC. 3. EFFORTS TO PROMOTE ISRAEL’S DIPLOMATIC RE13 LATIONS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES.

14 (a) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 60 days

15 after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually

16 thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to the ap17 propriate congressional committees a report which in18 cludes the following information (in classified or unclassi19 fied form, as appropriate):

20 (1) Actions taken by representatives of the

21 United States to encourage other countries to estab22 lish full diplomatic relations with Israel.

23 (2) Specific responses solicited and received by

24 the Secretary of State from countries that do not

25 maintain full diplomatic relations with Israel with
3

•HR 5023 IH

1 respect to the status of negotiations to enter into

2 diplomatic relations with Israel.

3 (3) Other measures being undertaken, and

4 measures that will be undertaken, by the United

5 States to ensure and promote Israel’s full participa6 tion in the world diplomatic community.

7 (b) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—

8 As used in this section the term, ‘‘appropriate congres9 sional committees’’ means the Committee on International

10 Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the

11 House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign

12 Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the

13 Senate.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.620 What are the requirements for protecting personnel from machinery?

The deepwater port operator must ensure that all personnel are protected from the risks created by operating machinery through the use of guard devices or other measures that comply with 29 CFR 1910.212, or through the use of conspicuously posted warning signs that comply with § 150.626 of this part.
§ 3030.183 Calculation of retirement obligation rate authority. ( a ) *Formulas.* ( 1 ) The formula for calculating the amount of retirement obligation rate authority available under this subpart, described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, is as follows: Where: T = most recently completed fiscal year. APT = total amortization payment for fiscal year T. TRT = total revenue in fiscal year T. PARAT = previously authorized retirement obligation rate authority, compounded through fiscal year T, expressed as a proportion of the market dominant rate base and calculated using the formula in paragraph (a)(2) of this section as described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. N = number of previously issued determinations in which retirement obligation rate authority was made available under this subpart.
( 2 ) The formula for calculating the amount of previously authorized retirement obligation rate authority through fiscal year T, described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, is as follows: Where: T = most recently completed fiscal year. rt = retirement obligation rate authority authorized in fiscal year T. N = number of previously issued determinations in which retirement obligation rate authority was made available under this subpart.
( b ) *Calculations.* ( 1 ) The amount of retirement obligation rate authority available for a fiscal year shall be calculated in four steps. First, the ratio of the total amortization payment for the fiscal year under review to the total revenue in the fiscal year under review shall be added to 1. This sum represents the factor by which an equal increase in market dominant and competitive rates in the fiscal year under review would generate sufficient additional revenue to make the full amortization payment. It does not account, however, for any previous rate authority authorized under this subpart. The second step is therefore to subtract the proportion of the market dominant rate base resulting from previously authorized retirement obligation rate authority. That proportion is calculated using the formula in paragraph (a)(2) of this section as described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section. Third, to amortize the resulting amount of retirement obligation rate authority over the remainder of the phase-in period, the difference shall be raised to the power of the inverse of the number of determinations remaining in the phase-in period, including the current determination. Finally, 1 shall be subtracted from the result to convert from a proportional change in rates to a percentage of rate adjustment authority.
( 2 ) The amount of previously authorized retirement obligation rate authority shall be calculated in two steps. First, the sums of 1 and the amount of retirement obligation rate authority authorized in each of the previous fiscal years shall be multiplied together. This product represents the compounded amount of such rate authority, expressed as a net rate increase. To express this product as a proportion of the market dominant rate base, the second step is to subtract the inverse of this product from 1.
§ 334.340 Chesapeake Bay off Plumtree Island, Hampton, Va.; Air Force precision test area. ( a ) *The danger zone.* The waters of Chesapeake Bay and connecting waters within an area bounded as follows: Beginning at latitude 37°08′12′′, longitude 76°19′30′′, which is a point on the circumference of a circle of 10,000-foot radius with its center on Plumtree Point at latitude 37°07′30′′, longitude 76°17′36′′; thence clockwise along the circumference of the circle to latitude 37°09′06′′, longitude 76°18′00′′; thence southeasterly to latitude 37°08′12′′, longitude 76°17′48′′; thence clockwise along the circumference of a circle of 4,000-foot radius (with its center at latitude 37°07′30′′, longitude 76°17′36′′) to latitude 37°07′48′′, longitude 76°18′24′′; thence northwesterly to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The danger zone will be in use not more than a total of 4 hours per month, which hours shall be during not more than any 2 days per month.
( 2 ) No person or vessel shall enter or remain in the danger zone during periods of firing or bombing or when the zone is otherwise in use.
( 3 ) The Commander, Tactical Air Command, Langley Air Force Base, Va., shall be responsible for publicizing in advance through the Coast Guard's “Local Notice to Mariners,” in the local press, and by radio from time to time the schedule of use of the area, and shall station patrol boats to warn vessels during periods of use.
( 4 ) This section shall be enforced by the Commander, Tactical Air Command, Langley Air Force Base, Va., or such agency as he may designate.
( c ) *Disestablishment of danger zone.* The danger zone will be disestablished not later than December 31, 1967, unless written application for its continuance shall have been made to and approved by the Secretary of the Army prior to that date.
[28 FR 1106, Feb. 5, 1963. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17553, Apr. 10, 1997]
§ 5.16 Compensation and travel expenses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no member of the Auxiliary will receive any compensation for services as a member of the Auxiliary.
( b ) A member of the Auxiliary may be paid actual necessary travelling expenses, including a per diem allowance.
#### Wetherington *v.*Cochran & Sons.

Submitted July 18, 1906.

Decided January 17, 1907.

Action for damages. Before Judge Mitchell. Thomas superior court. September 5, 1905.

*Theodore Titus,*for plaintiff.

*8. A. Boddenbery*and *Boscoe Luke,*for defendants.

Atkinson, J.

This was an action for damages on account of injuries received upon the part of the plaintiff by being struck and run over by certain mules, which the defendants caused to be driven along the street. When the charge of the court is considered in its entirety, there was no error in any of the excerpts from the same, upon which error was assigned, which requires a reversal of the judgment refusing to grant a new trial. The verdict for the defendants was supported by the evidence and approved by the presiding judge. We will not disturb his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
§ 25.109 Insurance and other subrogated claims. ( a ) The claims of an insured (subrogor) and an insurer (subrogee) for damages arising out of the same incident constitute a single claim. The total award of combined claims may not exceed the monetary jurisdiction of the settlement authority. If the total award of the combined claims exceeds, or is expected to exceed, a settlement authority's limits, the settlement authority is not permitted to consider either, and the claim file will be forwarded to an appropriate settlement authority.
( b ) An insured (subrogor) and an insurer (subrogee) may file a claim jointly or separately. If the insurer has fully reimbursed the insured, payment will only be made to the insurer. If separate claims are filed, the settlement will be made payable to each claimant to the extent of that claimant's undisputed interest. If joint claims are filed, the settlement will be sent to the insurer.
( c ) Each claimant shall include with a claim, a written disclosure concerning insurance coverage including: ( 1 ) The names and addresses of all insurers;
( 2 ) The kind and amount of insurance;
( 3 ) The policy number;
( 4 ) Whether a claim has been or will be presented to an insurer, and, if so, the amount of that claim; and whether the insurer has paid the claim in whole or in part, or has indicated payment will be made.
( d ) Each subrogee shall substantiate an interest or right to file a claim by appropriate documentary evidence and shall support the claim as to liability and measure of damages in the same manner as required of any other claimant. Documentary evidence of payment to a subrogor does not constitute evidence of liability of the United States or conclusive evidence of the amount of damages. The settlement authority makes an independent determination on the issues of fact and law based upon the evidence of record.
( e ) An insurance or other subrogated claim is not payable under Subpart E, F, or G of this part.
#### § 81.1 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*72 COLREGS* refers to the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, done at London, October 20, 1972, as rectified by the Proces-Verbal of December 1, 1973, as amended.

*A vessel of special construction or purpose* means a vessel designed or modified to perform a special function and whose arrangement is thereby made relatively inflexible.

*Interference with the special function of the vessel* occurs when installation or use of lights, shapes, or sound-signaling appliances under 72 COLREGS prevents or significantly hinders the operation in which the vessel is usually engaged.

[CGD 77-136, 47 FR 13799, Apr. 1, 1982]
§ 3000.103 Official seal. ( a ) *Authority.* The Seal described in this section is hereby established as the official seal of the Postal Regulatory Commission.
( b ) *Description.* ( 1 ) On a gold color (yellow) pentagon device, the base-line formed as a “V,” edged with a black border, a black triangle point down and between the inscription at top “Postal Regulatory Commission” in white letters and in base at the point of the triangle three Celeste mullets two, two and one, the American Eagle with branch and arrows derived from the Great Seal of the United States charged on the breast with the Commission's earlier round seal inscribed “Postal Regulatory Commission” and the date “2006”, all in gold (yellow).
( 2 ) The official seal of the Postal Regulatory Commission is modified when reproduced in black and white and when embossed, as it appears in this section.
( c ) *Custody and authorization to affix.* ( 1 ) The seal is the official emblem of the Postal Regulatory Commission and its use is permitted only as provided in this part.
( 2 ) The seal shall be kept in the custody of the Secretary and is to be used to authenticate records of the Postal Regulatory Commission and for other official purposes.
( 3 ) Use by any person or organization outside of the Commission may be made only with the Commission's prior written approval. Such request must be made in writing to the Secretary.
[78 FR 27045, May 9, 2013. Redesignated at 85 FR 9615, Feb. 19, 2020]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

FRANCISCO VALLES

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 0 0061

- C R

Appeal from the

409 th District Court

of El Paso County , Texas

(TC# 201 50D02069 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to file the

b rief until March 24

, 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO F ILE

THE STATE ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jai me E. Esp a rza, the State ’ s attorney, prepare the

State ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 24

, 201 9

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7 th day of February

, 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
### *T he HONORABLE ANDREW W. BOGUE, United States Distric t

Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting b y designation. ___________ No. 96-1888

___________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * * Plaintiff - Appellee * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. JOE ORONA * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellant * * Submitted: November 20, 1996 Filed: January 10, 1997

___________ Before MCMILLIAN and HENLEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, District Judge. *

___________ PER CURIAM.
Joe Orona entered a Rule 11(a)(2) plea to possession with intent to deliver marijuana. On appeal, Orona contends the district court improperl y ref used to suppress evidence and statements gathered during a search o f Orona's vehicle. Orona claims that the police expanded the scope of a lawful traffic stop without justification, and that he was thereafte r unla wfully seized. He further argues that his consent to search hi s veh icle was tainted by his unlawful arrest and that the search wa s therefore unlawful.After a careful review of the record and the parties' briefs,

we con clude the magistrate judge properly denied Orona's motion t o suppress, and that an opinion would lack precedential value and would serv e no useful purpose. We thus affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrat e judge's report adopted by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
3 Attachments 

Attached is a letter providing answers to EPA’s questions about modeling for the PPEC permit application. 

 

Also attached are the spreadsheets requested by EPA. 

 

Hard copies are being sent by US mail. 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

--Steve Hill 

Response to PSD Modeling Questions for Pio Pico Energy Center PSD Permit 

Steve Hill 

to: 

Gerardo Rios 

12/01/2011 10:33 AM 

Cc: 

Roger Kohn, Cleveland Holladay, "David Jenkins (djenkins@apexpowergroup.com)", 

"Fitzgerald, Maggie (maggie.fitzgerald@urs.com)", "McKinsey, John A.", Gary Rubenstein

Hide Details 

From: Steve Hill <SHill@sierraresearch.com> Sort List... 

To: Gerardo Rios/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Roger Kohn/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Cleveland Holladay/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, "David 

Jenkins (djenkins@apexpowergroup.com)" <djenkins@apexpowergroup.com>, "Fitzgerald, 

Maggie (maggie.fitzgerald@urs.com)" <maggie.fitzgerald@urs.com>, "McKinsey, John A." 

<JAMCKINSEY@stoel.com>, Gary Rubenstein <GRubenstein@sierraresearch.com>

Modeling Issues letter 12-1-11.pdf POP_1HRNO2_Cumulative_H8H.xlsx

PIOPICO_PM2 5_24Hour_Cumulative_H8H.xlsx

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\chollada\Local Settings\Temp\notesDF63F8\~web7460.h... 3/25/2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-80144-CR-Smith/Maynard(s)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOFF STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT,

MARIEL TOLLINCHI,

REGINE MARIE RENE, 

BRIANNA MONIQUE GAYLE,

and MAURICE SHAZIER,

Defendants.

GOVERNMENT’S SECOND DISCOVERY RESPONSE

The United States respectfully supplements our discovery response in this matter. The 

government has provided additional discovery to the defense as summarized in the attached 

inventory. All materials were disclosed via USAfx, the government’s filesharing program. The 

inventory is optimized for printing on legal paper.

Respectfully submitted,

JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: s/ Marc Osborne

Assistant United States Attorney

Court ID# A5500796

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Tel: (561) 209-1014

marc.osborne@usdoj.gov

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 88 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/12/2022 Page 1 of 1