alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## ( To: Through: From: MEMORANDUM STACK TEST FILE

- FLYING

### J JeffDean, Compliance Section

# Manage~· Harold Burge, Environmental Scientist Date: 2120/2003 Subject: Company: Testers: Location: Source: AIRS#: AO#: Action Code: Subject: FlyingJ AirPollution Testing/Clean Air Engineering 333 W. Center St., North SaltLake, Davis Co., UT FCC Regenrator Vent 01100008 DAQE-330.Q2 dated 6/3/2002 3A Review ofTest Reports dated 1211812002 

### & 21612003

( On 12120/2002 DAQ received a test report for the FCC Catalyst Regenerator Vent. The validity ofthe PMIO test results were questioned, and it was detennined that the assist air line valves were not operating according to design specifications. A report of the PM10 retest was received on 216/2003. In accordance with AO Conditions 16, 21.C.4, 22.C.3, & 24.C.4, testing was performed to verify and/or update the FCC Regenerator Vent S02, NOx, & PMIO emission factors. The DAQ-calculated testresults are: Source TestDate Pollutant Result VerifiedlUpdated Emission Factor FCC Regenerator 10/23/2002 S02 43.3521blhr 43.3521blhr Vent 1012312002 NOx 131 ppmdv 131 ppmdv 1211912002 PM10 19lblkbbl 22lblkbbl

DEVIATIONS: CONCLUSIONS: CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS: No deviations were noted. The verified/updated emission factors appear to be acceptable.

None.
Attachment 001 – ID Method – TS1201UC

1 of 2 pages 

# SANITIZEDAttachment 001 – ID Method – TS1201UC

2 of 2 pages 

# SANITIZED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aceto Corporation, a New York
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Douglas Roth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Douglas Roth
----------------
Douglas Roth
Chief Financial Officer
November 9, 2004
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 20

- 11214 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:19

- cr
- 00025

- PGB

- LRH

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JASO N MATTHEW ZELLER,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

___________ _____________ (January 28, 2021)
Before JILL PRYOR , LUCK , and BLACK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-11214 Date Filed: 01/28/2021 Page: 1 of 22 Jenny Devine, appointed counsel for Jason Zeller in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant t o Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED , and Zeller’s conviction s and sentence s are AFFIRMED

.

USCA11 Case: 20-11214 Date Filed: 01/28/2021 Page: 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Safesleep for your baby : reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)and other sleep-related causes of infant death.**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3352:SL 2/
Item Number:0506-D-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001061054
 
June 13, 2018
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ilan Kenig, certify that:



1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Unity Wireless Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



a)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 23, 2005

/s/ Ilan Kenig

Ilan Kenig
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1


STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Thomas Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Thomas
      Kidrin


Thomas
      Kidrin


Chief
      Executive Officer








Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
§ 25.107 Who may present claims. ( a ) General rules: ( 1 ) A claim for property loss or damage may be presented by anyone having an interest in the property, including an insurer or other subrogee, unless the interest is barred under § 25.109(a).
( 2 ) A claim for personal injury may be presented by the person injured.
( 3 ) A claim based on death may be presented by the executor or administrator of the decedent's estate, or any other person legally entitled to assert such a claim under local law. The claimant's status must be stated in the claim.
( 4 ) A claim for medical, hospital, or burial expenses may be presented by any person who by reason of family relationship has, in fact, incurred the expenses.
( b ) A joint claim must be presented in the names of and signed by, the joint claimants, and the settlement must be made payable to the joint claimants.
( c ) A claim may be presented by a duly authorized agent, legal representative or survivor, if it is presented in the name of the claimant. If the claim is not signed by the claimant, the agent, legal representative, or survivor shall indicate their title or legal capacity and provide evidence of their authority to present the claim.
( d ) Where the same claimant has a claim for damage to or loss of property and a claim for personal injury or a claim based on death arising out of the same incident, they must be combined in one claim.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 509 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 509

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the personal 
   representative of the estate of Fred Steffens of Big Horn County, 
     Wyoming, certain land comprising the Steffens family property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

  Mrs. Cubin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the personal 
   representative of the estate of Fred Steffens of Big Horn County, 
     Wyoming, certain land comprising the Steffens family property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF STEFFENS FAMILY PROPERTY.

    (a) Conveyance.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary of 
the Interior is directed to issue, without consideration, a quitclaim 
deed to Marie Wambeke of Big Horn County, Wyoming, the personal 
representative of the estate of Fred Steffens, to the land described in 
subsection (b): Provided, That all minerals underlying such land are 
hereby reserved to the United States.
    (b) Land Description.--The land referred to in subsection (a) is 
the approximately 80-parcel known as ``Farm Unit C'' in the E\1/2\NW\1/
4\ of Section 27 in Township 57 North, Range 97 West, 6th Principal 
Meridian, Wyoming.
    (c) Revocation of Withdrawal.--The Bureau of Reclamation withdrawal 
for the Shoshone Reclamation Project under Secretrial Order dated 
October 21, 1913, is hereby revoked with respect to the lands described 
in subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement No. 333-91578 of Peoples CommunityBancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-111992 of PeoplesCommunity Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-2 of our report dated October 30, 2003,incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PeoplesCommunity Bancorp, Inc.  for the year ended September 30, 2004.

 
| /s/ Grant  Thornton LLP |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Cincinnati,  Ohio       |   |
| December 28,  2004      |   |

 

----
§ 25.123 Settlement and notice to claimant. ( a ) If the settlement authority determines that the full amount claimed should be paid, the settlement authority forwards the claim to the disbursing officer for payment. If the time involved in settling the claim has been extensive, the settlement authority notifies the claimant.
( b ) If the settlement authority determines that less than the full amount claimed should be paid, the settlement authority: ( 1 ) Notifies the claimant in writing of the proposed settlement.
( 2 ) Obtains from the claimant written acceptance and release for payment of the claim in the reduced amount.
( 3 ) Advises the claimant, in the event claimant does not desire to accept the offer, to reply within 45 days giving reasons for rejection.
( 4 ) Except upon a showing of good cause for delay in accepting a proposed settlement within 45 days, treats the non-acceptance as a rejection. Rejection by a claimant of an offer of settlement renders the offer void.
( 5 ) If a claimant rejects a proposed settlement or fails to reply within 45 days, the settlement authority may make further efforts to settle the claim. When the settlement authority determines that further efforts to settle the claim are not warranted, the settlement authority notifies the claimant in writing by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, that the claim has been denied because the amount claimed is excessive.
( c ) If the claim is denied, the settlement authority notifies the claimant in writing by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)   In connection with the Annual Report of Health Enhancement Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas D. Ingolia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     Date: April 13, 2007 /s/ Thomas D. Ingolia Thomas D. Ingolia Chief Executive Officer    A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHAUN AKINDOALEXANDER RUSHING

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 1: 23

- cv

- 00169 ( UNA )

)

HOMELESS SHELTER , et al., )

)

Defendant s

. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint, ECF No. 1, and application for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. For the reasons explained below, the court will grant

plaintiff’s IFP application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject m atter jurisdiction

. S ee

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).

Plaintiff, a resident of the District of Columbia, sues an unnamed homeless shelter near

2nd and E Streets in N orthwest Washington, D.C., and 3 unnamed shelter employees , and in doing

so, fails to comply with by D.C. LCvR 5.1(c)(1). He alleges that several of defendant’s employees

have treated him with disrespect. More specifically, he contends that in January, he went to the

shelter to retrieve some of his belongings b ut was prohibited from entering the premises. He

demands $145 million in damages.

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdi c tion is available

only when a “federal question” is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the amount

in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts

that bring the suit within the co urt's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such

facts warrants dismissal of the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).First, plaintiff’s claims fail to raise a ny federal question. Second, based on the information

provided, plaintiff and defendant s are all located in the District of Columbia

, so there can be no

diversity jurisdiction

. See Bush v. Butler , 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Owen

Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger , 437 U.S. 365, 373

- 74 (1978)) ( “For jurisdiction to exist under

28 U.S.C. § 1332, there must be complete diversity between the parties, which is to say that the

plaintiff may not be a citizen of the same state as any defendant.” )

. Therefore, this court cannot

exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this matter.

For all of these reasons

, th e complaint, ECF No. 1, and the case , is dismissed without

prejudice

. A separate o rder accompanies this memorandum o pinion.

SO ORDERED.

Date: February 9, 2023

___________ /s/

____________ RUDOLPH CONTRERAS

United States District Judge
PPP Loan Applications Monthly Payroll Analysis

APPLICATION 

DATE COMPANY

AVERAGE MONTHLY PAYROLL

PER 

APPLICATION 2019

1/1/2020 –

APPLICATION 

DATE

2020

5/29/2020 One Solution Group LLC $ 8,333.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,073.48 $ 2,499.84 

6/15/2020 Clear Shot Entertainment LLC $ 61,041.00 $ 1,485.13 $ 59.38 $ 11,514.90 

6/18/2020 Unfold Perception LLC $ 32,782.00 $ 25.00 $ 64.11 $ 5,703.68 

2/12/2021 Clear Shot Entertainment LLC $ 64,542.00 $ 1,485.13 N/A $ 11,514.90 

2/12/2021 Jream Vision TV LLC $ 57,365.00 $ 964.17 N/A $ 712.08 

2/12/2021 Sunrise City Construction Development LLC $ 57,289.00 $ 8,651.33 N/A $ 6,158.17 

2/15/2021 Cinda Foundation Inc. $ 57,168.00 $ 5,328.92 N/A $ 275.00 

2/20/2021 DDZ Family Enterprises LLC $ 57,378.00 $ 536.42 N/A $ 4,110.83 

2/22/2021 Unfold Perception LLC $ 32,781.00 $ 25.00 N/A $ 5,703.68 

5/5/2021 DDZ Family Enterprises LLC $ 57,379.00 $ 536.42 N/A $ 4,110.83 

5/5/2021 Jream Vision TV LLC $ 57,379.00 $ 964.17 N/A $ 712.08 

5/5/2021 Sunrise City Construction Development LLC $ 57,379.00 $ 8,651.33 N/A $ 6,158.17 

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-11 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Onvia, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cameron S. Way, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Cameron S. Way                                    
|Cameron S. Way Chief Accounting Officer March 31, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Onvia, Inc. and will be retained by Onvia, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Washington, DC 20460

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Index of docketed test reports in the from aerodynamic test facilities that 

contributed to USEPA’s research

FROM: Arvon Mitcham, Mechanical Engineer, and Sam Waltzer, Environmental 

Engineer.

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum provides an index of the test reports received by USEPA that present test 

results and technical discussion from facilities conducting aerodynamic research in support of the 

rulemaking Control of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (EPA 420-F-10-038). Specifically, these reports cover the wind 

tunnel and computation fluid dynamics portion. Please refer to the table below for the index and 

elsewhere in the docket for coastdown reports. 

Facility Name of Report

SAE J1252 (Wind Tunnel) Testing

Full-scale testing National Research 

Council of Canada 

(NRC-C)

“An Evaluation of Techniques for the Measurement of Commercial 

Truck Aerodynamic Drag,” November 25, 2010, Jason Leuschen 

and Bernard Tanguay (Aerodynamics Laboratory), Gordon Poole 

and William Mayda (Centre for Surface Transportation 

Technology). 

Reduced-Scale 

(1/8th) testing

Auto Research Center –

Indianapolis (ARC-Indy)

Auto Research Center Scale Model Wind Tunnel Study Using a 

Class Eight Semi Truck and Wabash Trailer – Truck A Model

Auto Research Center Scale Model Wind Tunnel Study Using a 

Class Eight Semi Truck and Wabash Trailer – Truck B Model

Auto Research Center Class Eight Semi Truck Aerodynamic Fuel 

Economy Test – Truck C Model

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

Navier-Stokes based 

software (RANS)

CD-Adapco “Aerodynamics of Large Vehicles, ” “Guidelines for Steady State 

Aerodynamics of Large Vehicles,” and “Comments on EPA-HQOAR-2010-0162: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel 

Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy-Duty Engines and 

Vehicles,” Gregg Gustafson, Nick Appleyard and Frederick J. Ross

Lattice-Boltzmann

based software

Exa Corporation “PowerFLOW Results: Presentation in Ann Arbor,” “Exa Meeting 

with EPA,” and “Additional Results for EPA: Reduced Resolution 

Tests,” Doug Hatfield, Kevin Horrigan and Dr. Ales Alajbegovic.