alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Richard B. Abshire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard B. Abshire


Richard B. Abshire


Chief Financial Officer





Date: November 12, 2010
































This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Ling, Michael

Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 11:54 AM

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'; Brachtl, Megan

Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866 and 13563 Data Requirements for SO2

FR

Hi Aaron. Attached is the draft memo for your review. Let me know when you want to share with us

your reaction to it. I trust it addresses your suggestion.

I al so just want to flag for you that we have made a couple of minor edits to the preamble and rule since

the version I sent you on July 2. Very minor stuff to reflect our conversation the week of July 6 and

other edits to polish up our responses to the inter agency comments. Would you like me to send over

that version as well?

Thanks.

Michael Ling

Associate Director

Air Quality Policy Division

U.S. EPA

- OAQPS

(919) 541

- 4729

From: Ling, Michael

Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 2:29 PM

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'; B rachtl, Megan

Subject: RE: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866 and 13563 Data Requirements for SO2

FR

Hi Aaron. Thank for your comments. In Megan’s absence, I am forwarding to you our suggested edits to

the preamble in response to the comment s. We’d like to set up some time ASAP to go over these with

you and anyone else you think should be included. I will note that the edits address virtually all of the

comments, but there are one or two remaining comments we’d like to discuss with you when we meet,

so we can determine whether and how best to address them. Let’s talk early next week about a time to

get together and let me know in the meantime if you have any questions. Hope you have a wonderful

4 th

– one of my favorite times to be in DC.

Michael Ling

Associate Director

Air Quality Policy Division

U.S. EPA

- OAQPS

(919) 541

- 4729

From: Szabo, Aaron [ mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 5:55 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan

Cc: Ling, Michael

Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO 12866 and 13563 Data Requirements for SO2 FRAttached please find a summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 1363 on the EPA final

rule entitled, Data Requirements Rule for the 2010 1

- Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Primary National

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).

Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions.

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202

- 395

- 3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1046

___________ Audrey Montgomery, as Administratrix * of the Estate of Leroy Montgomery and * on behalf of Ivy R. Montgomery, Eddie * Montgomery, Casey Montgomery, * minors; Lerondria Montgomery; Corey * Allen; Yuri Allen, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Appellants, * Eastern District of Arkansas. * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * United States of America, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 13, 1999 Filed: October 4, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, BRIGHT, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Leroy Montgomery was treated at the Veterans Administration Medical Center in Little Rock for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, an irreversible lung disease that eventually causes respiratory failure and death. Following his death at the VA hospital, his wife, plaintiff Audrey Montgomery, filed suit in the District Court under the Federal1 TheHonorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas. -2- Tort Claims Act on behalf of Leroy Montgomery's estate and his children. The complaint alleges medical negligence. Thecase was tried to the District Court. 1 After weighing the evidence, the court madefindings of fact adverse to plaintiffs' case and entered judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice. For reversal, plaintiffs argue that the District Court's finding that they failed to meet their burden of proof was clearly erroneous. More particularly, plaintiffs argue that the trial court clearly erred in finding that the decision to discharge Montgomery met the applicable standards of care and in finding that Montgomery had not been scheduledfor imminent lung-transplant surgery. Having reviewed the case, we conclude that these findings are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Converted by Wiklow Corporate Services Inc.


Exhibit 4.1




DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK




Common Stock




Our authorized capital consists of 400,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share.




Holders of our common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase additional shares of common stock or other subscription rights. The common stock carries no conversion rights and is not subject to redemption or to any sinking fund provisions. All of our issued common stock is entitled to share equally in dividends from sources legally available, when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors, and upon our liquidation or dissolution, whether voluntary or involuntary, to share equally in our assets available for distribution to security holders.




Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue additional shares of common stock not to exceed the amount authorized by our Articles of Incorporation, on such terms and conditions and for such consideration as the Board may deem appropriate without further security holder action.




Voting Rights




Each holder of our common stock is entitled to one vote per share on all matters on which such stockholders are entitled to vote.  Since the common stock does not have cumulative voting rights, the holders of more than 50% of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect all the directors if they choose to do so and, in such event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any person to the Board of Directors.




Dividend Policy




Holders of our common stock are entitled to dividends if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. Since our inception as a company on February 9, 2007, we have not declared any dividends, nor do we intend to issue any cash dividends in the future. Our foreseeable plans include retaining earnings, if any, to finance the development and expansion of our business.
#### § 5.9 References.

Further guidance on Auxiliary missions and activities may be found in Coast Guard directives and publications, including the Auxiliary Manual (Commandant Instruction M16790.1(series)) and the Auxiliary Operations Policy Manual (Commandant Instruction M16798.3(series)). Those directives and publications can be found online at *https://www.dcms.uscg.mil/directives*.

[USCG-1999-6712, 80 FR 3476, Jan. 23, 2015, as amended by USCG-2022-0323, 88 FR 10028, Feb. 16, 2023]
# Jornal Oficial C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 427I |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 62.° ano19 de dezembro de 2019 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 427I

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

62.° ano19 de dezembro de 2019

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Avisos |
| | PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Comissão Europeia |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Convite à apresentação de candidaturas ao Prémio Jan Amos Comenius para a excelência do ensino sobre a União Europeia | 1 |

Índice

Página

V   Avisos

PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Comissão Europeia

2019/C 427 I/01

Convite à apresentação de candidaturas ao Prémio Jan Amos Comenius para a excelência do ensino sobre a União Europeia

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

V Avisos

PROCEDIMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Comissão Europeia

| 19.12.2019 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CI 427/1

---

COMISSÃO EUROPEIA

Convite à apresentação de candidaturas ao «Prémio Jan Amos Comenius para a excelência do ensino sobre a União Europeia»

(2019/C 427 I/01)

A Direção-Geral da Educação, da Juventude, do Desporto e da Cultura da Comissão Europeia lançou um convite à apresentação de candidaturas ao «Prémio Jan Amos Comenius para a excelência do ensino sobre a União Europeia».

O prémio destina-se a recompensar escolas secundárias que, através de estratégias inspiradoras, ajudam os seus alunos a aprender sobre a União Europeia. O prémio trará o reconhecimento e a visibilidade europeus ao trabalho mais relevante desenvolvido nesse sentido em cada Estado-Membro e destacará quão importante é ensinar e aprender sobre a UE desde a mais tenra idade. Destacará ainda exemplos de métodos pedagógicos inovadores que envolvam ativamente os alunos na aprendizagem sobre a UE e contribuirá para a sua divulgação.

O convite é dirigido a escolas secundárias (níveis 2 e 3 da CITE) sediadas na União Europeia (e não a professores individuais).

Este concurso atribuirá um máximo de vinte e oito (28) prémios no valor de 8 000 euros cada, um por Estado-Membro da UE.

Se o Reino Unido sair da UE antes de a Comissão Europeia tomar a decisão de atribuição dos prémios (logo após a avaliação das candidaturas) sem um acordo que garanta que as candidaturas do Reino Unido continuam a ser elegíveis, as escolas secundárias do Reino Unido deixarão de ser elegíveis para este prémio. Neste caso, o número máximo de prémios será de 27 (em vez de 28), mas o valor de cada prémio continuará a ser o mesmo (8 000 euros).

O prazo para apresentação das candidaturas termina às 17:00 (hora da Europa Central) de quinta-feira 6 de fevereiro de 2020.

Todas as informações pertinentes e os formulários de candidatura estão disponíveis em:

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_pt

---
§ 80.135 Hull, MA to Race Point, MA. ( a ) Except inside lines described in this section, the 72 COLREGS apply on the harbors, bays, and inlets on the east coast of Massachusetts from the easternmost radio tower at Hull, charted in approximate position latitude 42°16.7′ N., longitude 70°52.6′ W., to Race Point on Cape Cod.
( b ) A line drawn from Canal Breakwater Light 6 south to the shoreline.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977, as amended by CGD 79-066, 45 FR 15176, Mar. 10, 1980. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, and amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7786, Mar. 6, 1986; USCG-2022-0323, 88 FR 10028, Feb. 16, 2023]
§ 50.4 Presentation of case. ( a ) The applicant may present his case: ( 1 ) Solely by written application, or by written application together with any additional written evidence or argument that he may desire to submit;
( 2 ) At a hearing before the Board.
( b ) The case of an applicant may be presented by his counsel. The term “counsel” includes members of the bar in good standing, accredited representatives of veterans' organizations recognized by the Veterans' Administration under section 200 of the act of June 29, 1936 (49 Stat. 2031, 38 U. S. C. 101), and any other person approved by the Board.
( c ) If an applicant signifies a desire to present his case at a hearing, the Board will give him written notice of the place of his hearing, and of the time, which shall be at least thirty days after the time of mailing the notice.
( d ) The Board may, upon its own motion or at the request of the applicant or his counsel, grant a continuance whenever it appears necessary, in the judgment of the Board, in order to insure a thorough, complete and equitable hearing.
( e ) The case of any applicant who fails to appear, either in person or by counsel, after being duly notified of the time and place of the hearing will be decided upon the written application and such other evidence as is available to the Board.
( f ) As far as practicable the hearings of the Board will be conducted in accordance with the pertinent instructions contained in Coast Guard Boards, 1935, as amended, except that: ( 1 ) Physical examination of the applicant is not mandatory, but the Board may request that he submit to physical examination by physicians of the Board's choice in any case in which it appears to the satisfaction of the Board to be essential;
( 2 ) The medical members of the Board will not submit a report and will not be subject to examination.
( g ) Evidence may be submitted to the Board by oral testimony under oath, or in the form of depositions or affidavits. Witnesses appearing before the Board will be subject to examination or cross-examination, as the case may be, by members of the Board and the applicant or his counsel.
( h ) The Board will consider all available service records and all matter adduced by the applicant that bears upon the merits of the case. It will not be restricted by the rules of evidence.
( i ) Classified matter of the Coast Guard will not be made available to an applicant or his counsel. The Board will, when it deems it necessary in the interest of justice and compatible with the public interest, make available a summary of relevant classified matter.
( j ) The Government will not assume or pay any expenses incurred by an applicant, or by his witnesses or counsel.
[10 FR 5650, May 17, 1945. Redesignated at 13 FR 7303, Nov. 30, 1948]
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Richard B. Abshire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Richard B. Abshire
 Richard B. Abshire
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 Date: November 13, 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     0
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   36988
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164335
<ALLOWANCES>                                   9515
<INVENTORY>                                    227168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               597685
<PP&E>                                         512226
<DEPRECIATION>                                 300182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1426005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          562429
<BONDS>                                        585653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    48243
<COMMON>                                       2586
<OTHER-SE>                                     138104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1426005
<SALES>                                        1004339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1073139
<CGS>                                          937983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  970625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               96345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             22835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6389)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   847
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      28956
<NET-INCOME>                                   21752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
§ 245.40 Removal by responsible party. ( a ) *Corps monitoring.* If the owner, lessee or operator agrees to remove a hazard to navigation, the District Engineer should ascertain that: ( 1 ) Marking is accomplished promptly and is maintained,
( 2 ) The plan for removal and disposal is reasonable and acceptable to the District Engineer,
( 3 ) Removal operations do not unreasonably interfere with navigation,
( 4 ) All conditions of the Corps of Engineers permit are met, and
( 5 ) Removal operations are pursued diligently.
( b ) *Deficiencies.* If the removal actions are not proceeding satisfactorily, the District Engineer will notify the responsible party of the deficiencies and provide a reasonable time for correction. If not corrected promptly, the District Engineer may declare the wreck “abandoned” and proceed with actions toward Corps removal.
0-cr-06239-WPD Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2000 P
### Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 24,2015

In The



## C!tnurl nf Appeals



# lJiiftil ilistrict nf 

# Wcxas at ilallas

No. 05-15-00636-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-15-76



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Francis

This is an appeal from the trial court's April 28, 2015 and June 10, 2015 orders denying

appellant's motions to recuse the trial judge. Because no final judgment has been entered, and an

order denying a motion to recuse is appealable only upon final judgment, we directed appellant

to file a letter brief addressing our jurisdiction. 

### See TEX. R. Civ. P. 18aU)(1)(A); 

### Ogletree v.

Matthews, 262 S. W.3d 316, 319 n.l (Tex. 2007) ("Texas appellate courts have jurisdiction only

over final orders or judgments unless a statute permits an interlocutory appeal."). Although

appellant complied, she has failed to show the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

### See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

150363F.P05 /Molly Francis/

MOLLY FRANCIS

JUSTICE 

## RECEIVED IN**~OURT** OF /\PPEALS, 5th OIST.



## DEC 1 1 

## Z015

LISA MATZ

CLERK. 5th DISTRICT

## C!t:nurf nf J\pp£aln

Yiftij ilintrid nf W£xan at llallan

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.A., A CHILD On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District

Court, Rockwall County, Texas

No. 05-15-00636-CV Trial Court Cause No. 1-15-76.

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis.

Justices Evans and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion ofthis date, we 

### DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER appellees David Rohlf, Michael Goodman, James Andrew Aikens, Nancy

Aikens, Gary Arey, Susan Wright, Ann Marie Jordan, Shawn Richards, Carece Buraqck, Breena

Nichols Rhodes, and Matthew Joseph Aikens recover their costs, if any, of this appeal from

appellant Sherry Rhodes.

Judgment entered November 24, 2015.



### -2-

### Order entered November 24,2015

In The



## QCourt of appeals

.1'tftb**j~Btsttttt** 

## of QJ:exas at**j~Ballas**

No. 05-15-00636-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1-15-76



### ORDER

In light ofthe Court's opinion of this date, we 

### DENY all pending motions as moot.



### Is/ MOLLY FRANCIS

JUSTICE<Courtof1\pp.eals1Jisfrt.ctofQf.exasatDallasGeorgeL.AllenSr.CourtsBuilding600CommerceStreet,Suite200Dallas,Texas75202!''4TEX.I\SC};r::tt?5:J.)25NO\i''lS9LCASE:05-15-00636-CVMATT.-#198H..i.,,1'---._J..=NOT.1-..L.:l-'<-...\.,f',·-r,J..Tf)n;:\Tlf;=/i_R:,JN.l\S_E;o.-;::r-"-POS)--<lcj'-Q-<',,0!;:'{1$cor.485NC_:\I:)-!·::.:-·---t;!'iOJ..,;;,../.tf4/..J.,::!i'r",.......--r-r:.'"='"!"---"'=-0-A!1DRi='<;:nCR_D*7r;-/lt::;...LLL.L1L_______L!L..Ht1!tI'i!ftH!HIilIIjI!!i!jI!!tI!!IIi!)HIti!1