alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GEORGE E. PHELAN, Appellant, v. HUGH A. COLLENDER, Respondent.

*Trade mark*— use *of name.*

Appeal from an order of the Special Term, denying a motion for an *injunction, pendente lite.*

The defendant is the survivor of the firm of Phelan *&*Oollender. On the decease of his partner, he purchased of his executors all their right, title and interest in and to, and all the right, title and interest of the said Michael Phelan, prior to his death, in and to the fixtures and personal property of every description, in the building occupied by the firm, and all the letters patent owned by the firm or in which the firm had any interest, and in and to all trade marks used by the late firm. The leases of the places of business occupied by the late firm were assigned to him by the executors, and he has since carried on' the business of manufacturing billiard tables, describing himself in his business card, advertisements and business transactions as “ H. *W.*Oollender, successor to Phelan *&*Oollender,” and describing his billiard tables as “Phelan *&*Collender’s Standard American Tables.”

The plaintiff, a son of Michael Phelan, is also engaged in the manufacture of billiard tables, and he alleges that the defendant, by assuming to use the words “ successor to Phelan & Oollender,” and to describe his tables as “ Phelan & Oollender’s Standard American Tables,” is injuring his business, by inducing customers of the late firm, who would otherwise have dealt with plaintiff, but who have been misled by the use of such name, to deal in billiard tables and articles pertaining thereto with defendant.

The General Term held, that the plaintiff’s right of action did not rest upon his relationship to his deceased father, nor upon any right or interest in the concerns of the late firm, but solely on the ground that his name was Phelan, and that he was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling billiard tables, and that his business was injured by the use of that name by defendant, in connection with his business; that any other Phelan, who happened to be in the same business, would have the same legal right to enjoin *245the use of the name by defendant, and could maintain an action for that purpose if plaintiff could do so; and that as he did not allege that the defendant had used the name Phelan in such a way as to make it appear to be that of plaintiff himself, or had resorted to other artifice, to induce the belief that the establishment of defendant was the same as that of plaintiff, or to mislead customers to purchase of him under the belief that they were buying of plaintiff, or were buying articles of plaintiff’s manufacture, he was not entitled to an injunction.

*Richard O’ Gorman,*for appellant. *M. Nolan,*for respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs, besides disbursements.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aceto Corporation, a New York
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Douglas Roth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



/s/ Douglas Roth
----------------
Douglas Roth
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2007
§ 264.3 Responsibility. ( a ) *Manager, Records Office.* The Manager, Records Office, is responsible for categorizing records as vital, and in conjunction with the Chief Postal Inspector/Emergency Coordinator shall establish and maintain the vital records program, and ensure compliance with supportive procedures.
( b ) Chief Postal Inspector. As the Postal Service's Emergency Coordinator, the Chief Postal Inspector shall establish and maintain a program to ensure that vital records are available at predesignated off-site locations for use during a national emergency.
( c ) *Custodians.* Custodians are responsible for following vital records program procedures including the forwarding of vital records to predesignated off-site locations.
[44 FR 51224, Aug. 31, 1979, as amended at 60 FR 57344, Nov. 15, 1995; 64 FR 41290, July 30, 1999; 68 FR 56558, Oct. 1, 2003]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-37, 446]


Mulay Plastics Casa Grande, AZ; Dismissal of Application for 
Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Mulay Plastics, Casa Grande, 
Arizona. The application contained no new substantial information which 
would bear importantly on the Department's determination. Therefore, 
dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-37,446; Mulay Plastics, Casa Grande, Arizona.
(May 31, 2000)

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 31st day of May, 2000.
Grant D. Beale,
Program Manager, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 00-14474 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

A.D., the mother,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-1918

[August 21, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Michael C. Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562017-DP-000073

A.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Kelley Schaeffer of the Department of Children & Families Children’s 

Legal Services, Bradenton, for appellee Department of Children and 

Families.

Thomasina Moore, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, for appellee 

Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
May 27, 2015

Mr. Randy A. Hemmel 80 Fawnridge Dr. Long Valley, NJ 07853

Dear Mr. Hemmel:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 15, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1026), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
T H I R D D I V I S I O N E L L I N G T O N , P

. J. , A N DR E W

S an d R I C KM A N , JJ.

NO T I C E: M o t i o n s f o r r e c o n s i d e r

a t i o n m u s t b e p h y s i c a l l y r e c e i v e d i n o u r c l e r k ’ s o f f i c e w i t h i n t e n d a y s o f t h e d a t e o f d e c i s i o n t o b e d e e m e d t i m e l y f i l e d

.

h t t p : / / w w w

. g a a p p e a l s

. u s / r u l e s

N o vem b er 3, 2017



# I n t h e C o u r t o f A

p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

A 1 7 A 0 9 7 1
, A 1 7 A 0 9 7 2 ; B R U C E N E L SO N
, E X E C U T O R OF T H

E W I L L O F E L O I SE N

E L SO N
, D E C E

A SE D v

. C A

R I N G C O M PA N I O N S, I N C

. ; a

n d v i c e v e r sa

. R I

- 0 3 7
, 0 3 8

R I C K M A N , Ju d g e

.

I n t h i s c a s e , t h e f o l l o w i n g c i r c u m st a

n c e s e x i st a

n d a r e d i sp o si t i v e o f t

h e a p p e a l :
( 1 ) T h e e v i d e n c e su p p o r t s t h e j u d g m e n t ;
( 2 ) N o r e v e r si

b l e e r r o r o f l a

w a p p e a r s, a n d a n o p i n i o n wo u l d h a

v e n o

p r e c e d e n t i a l v a l u e ;

a n d

( 3 ) T h e j u d g

m e n t o f t h e c o u r t b e l o w a d e q u a

t e l y e x p l a i n s t h e d e c i si o n

.

T h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e c o u r t b e l o w t

h e r e f o r e i s a f f i r m e d i n a c c o r d a

n c e w i t h C o u r t

o f A p p e a l s R u l e 3 6

.

J u d g m e n t a f f i r m e d

. E l l i n g t o n , P

. J

. , a n d A n d

re w s, J

., c o n c u r

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON 

 

DONALD J. TRUMP,

 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

Defendant. 

 / 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE 

PORTIONS OF GLOBAL ISSUES BRIEF UNDER SEAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to File Portions of Global 

Issues Brief Under Seal (the “Motion”) [ECF No. 165]. The Motion seeks permission to file under 

seal portions of a brief submitted to the Special Master, which refer to certain seized materials or 

categories of seized materials, and which fall within the scope of the protective order issued by the 

Special Master [ECF No. 113]. 

The Court has reviewed the Motion and is otherwise duly advised. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The Motion [ECF No. 165] is GRANTED. 

2. On or before November 8, 2022, Defendant shall file its Global Issues Brief with proposed 

redactions under seal. 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 166-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2022 Page 1 of 2
3. The seal will remain in place until further order of the Court. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 8th day of November

2022. 

 

cc: counsel of record 

 _______________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 166-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2022 Page 2 of 2
Case 0:00-cr-06240-WPD Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2001 Page 1 of 1
### Fw: Data Request Michael Stewart to: crabtree.tricia 01/31/2010 11:37 AM

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D. Environmental Protection Specialist Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-7524 stewart.michael@epa.gov

-----Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/31/2010 11:37AM -----

To: Edmund <crouch@CambridgeEnvironmental.com> From: Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US Date: 01/29/2010 04:26PM cc: graham.stephen@epa.gov, martin.karen@epa.gov Subject: Data Request

Dr Crouch:

This is a follow-up to the email I sent this morning. We believe that we have compiled the data that you requested. If you can provide an FTP site, we can start uploading the data files this afternoon. Please let me know if this is convenient for you.

Thanks, Michael

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D. Environmental Protection Specialist Health and Environmental Impacts Division US. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-7524 stewart.michael@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Alico, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2011 (the Form 10-Q ), I, JD Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|Dated: February 9, 2011            
|/S/ JD ALEXANDER                   
|JD Alexander                       
|President & Chief Executive Officer
§ 958.3 Petition for hearing. Within 30 days of being served the Postal Service's Complaint alleging liability under 39 U.S.C. 3018, the respondent may request a hearing by filing a written Hearing Petition with the Recorder. The respondent's Petition must include the following: ( a ) The words “Petition for Hearing Related to Prohibitions Regarding the Mailing of Hazardous Material” or other words reasonably identifying it as such;
( b ) The name of the respondent as well as his or her work and home addresses, and work and home telephone numbers; and other address and telephone number where the respondent may be contacted about the hearing proceedings;
( c ) The date on which the respondent received the Complaint issued by the Determining Official;
( d ) A statement indicating whether the respondent requests an oral hearing or a decision solely on the written record;
( e ) If the respondent requests an oral hearing, a statement proposing a city for the hearing site, with justification for holding the hearing in that city, as well as recommended dates for the hearing; and
( f ) A statement admitting or denying each of the allegations of liability made in the Complaint, and stating any defense on which the respondent intends to rely.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.732 Escorted Submarines Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone. ( a ) *Location.* The following areas are regulated navigation areas (RNA) whenever any Navy submarine (foreign or domestic) is being escorted by the Coast Guard within the Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone territorial seas: ( 1 ) All waters within 1 nautical mile of any Navy submarine operating within the Sector Jacksonville Captain of the Port Zone territorial seas; and
( 2 ) All waters within 1 nautical mile of the charted center of the navigation channel from the southern tip of Crab Island in the Cumberland Sound, Georgia, to the St. Marys Entrance Channel and its approach extending eastward to lighted buoy “STM.”
( b ) *Regulations.* All persons and vessels located within a RNA created by paragraph (a) shall follow all lawful orders and/or directions given to them by designated Coast Guard representatives. 33 CFR 165, subpart B, contains additional provisions applicable to the RNA created in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Notification.* The Coast Guard escort will attempt, when necessary and practicable, to notify any persons or vessels inside or approaching the vicinity of a RNA created in paragraph (a) of this section of its existence via VHF Channel 16 and/or any other means reasonably available.
[USCG-2016-0032, 82 FR 13967, Mar. 16, 2017]
§ 3060.11 Valuation of assets. For the purposes of 39 U.S.C. 2011, the total assets of the Postal Service theoretical competitive products enterprise are the greater of: ( a ) The percentage of total Postal Service revenues and receipts from competitive products times the total net assets of the Postal Service, or
( b ) The net assets related to the provision of competitive products as determined pursuant to § 3060.12.
EPA Meeting with Petroleum Equipment Institute

February 1, 2012

Attendees:

EPA OUST: 

Liz McDermott, Linda Gerber, Paul Miller, Tim Roberts, Erin Knighton, Cho Yi Kwan, Dave 

Hamnett, Tim Smith

Petroleum Equipment Institute (PEI):

Robert Renkes

At this meeting EPA and the PEI discussed the proposed changes to the UST regulations. The 

discussion focused on the proposed walk through inspections, industry standards and codes of 

practice and flow restrictors.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Q-Net Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Danny
Hon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/Danny Hon
------------
Danny Hon
Chief Financial Officer
February 3, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 385.4 Limitation on applicability of programmatic regulations.

In accordance with section 601(h)(3)(c)(ii) of WRDA 2000, this part expressly prohibits “the requirement for concurrence by the Secretary of the Interior or the Governor on Project Implementation Reports, Project Cooperation Agreements, Operating Manuals for individual projects undertaken in the Plan, and any other documents relating to the development, implementation, and management of individual features of the Plan, unless such concurrence is provided for in other Federal or State laws.”
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The Southeast�s timberindustry, an assessment of timber product output and use**
 
1992 | 1995
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.80/29:
Item Number:0083-B-38 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000645869
 
December 16, 2019
§ 403.3 Definitions. [Rule 3] In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires: ( a ) *Application* includes complaint;
( b ) *Affidavit* includes a written affirmation;
( c ) *Board* means the Joint Tolls Review Board;
( d ) Words in the singular include the plural and words in the plural include the singular [Rule 3].
[24 FR 9307, Nov. 18, 1959; 24 FR 10445, Dec. 23, 1959, as amended at 43 FR 30539, July 17, 1978. Redesignated at 47 FR 13805, Apr. 1, 1982]
#### § 4.5 Assistant Postmasters General, General Counsel, Judicial Officer, Chief Postal Inspector.

There are within the Postal Service a General Counsel, a Judicial Officer, a Chief Postal Inspector, and such number of officers, described in 39 U.S.C. 204 as Assistant Postmasters General, whether so denominated or not, as the Board authorizes by resolution. These officers are appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the Postmaster General. The Chief Postal Inspector shall report to, and be under the general supervision of, the Postmaster General. The Postmaster General shall promptly notify the Governors and both Houses of Congress in writing if he or she removes the Chief Postal Inspector or transfers the Chief Postal Inspector to another position or location within the Postal Service, and shall include in any such notification the reasons for such removal or transfer. The Postmaster General's appointment of the Judicial Officer and any other judges in the Judicial Officer Department must be ratified by resolution of the Governors.

[86 FR 10013, Feb. 18, 2021]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5188

To amend the Missing Children’s Assistance Act to extend the applicability

of such Act to individuals determined to have a mental capacity less

than 18 years of age.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 14, 2000

Mrs. THURMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Missing Children’s Assistance Act to extend

the applicability of such Act to individuals determined

to have a mental capacity less than 18 years of age.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Audrey Nerenberg

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

7 Section 403(1) of the Missing Children’s Assistance

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 5772(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(or

9 whose mental capacity is less than 18 years of age as de-
2

•HR 5188 IH

1 termined by an appropriate medical authority)’’ after

2 ‘‘age’’.

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall

5 take effect on the 1st day of the 1st fiscal year beginning

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.616 What are the requirements for lockout?

The deepwater port operator must ensure that, if electrical, hydraulic, mechanical, or pneumatic equipment does not need to be powered during the work described in § 150.615(a) of this part, and has a lockout or other device to prevent the equipment from being turned on unintentionally, that the lockout or other device is activated.

[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39183, July 1, 2013]