alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY Public Hearing ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR THREE TYPES OF CONSUMER PRODUCTS Docket Number CE-RM-87-102 January 12, 1989 Washington, D.C.

OPENING REMARKS TIME Michael McCabe

SCHEDULED SPEAKERS Chief, Test & Evaluation Program Conservation & Renewable Energy

REPRESENTING 9:30- 9:40

1. Marlo R. Martin Quantum Optics, Inc. 9:40-10:00 2. Michael Totten Office of Rep. Claudine Schneider 10:05-10:25 3. Richard Hill University of Maine 10:30-10:50 4. Tom Lloyd Dow Chemical U.S.A. 10:55-11:15 5. John Hoffman U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 11:20-11:40 6. David Goldstein Natural Resource Defense Council 11:45-12:05 ****** L U N C H ****** 12:05- 1:00 7. Robert Holding Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers 1:10- 1:30 8. Terry Clausen Solar Energy Research Institute 1:35- 1:55 9. Monty Winkler California Energy Commission 2:00- 2:20 10. Ray Bohman Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers 2:25- 2:45- 11. Margaret Gardner Northwest Power Planning Council 2:50- 3:10 ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY Public Hearing ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR THREE TYPES OF CONSUMER PRODUCTS

OPENING REMARKS Michael McCabe
SCHEDULED SPEAKERS 1. MarloR. Marti n 2. Michael Totten 3. Richard Hill 4. Tom Ll oyd 5. John Hoffman 6. David Goldstein
7. Robert Holding 8. Terry Cl ausen 9. Monti Winkl er Docket Number CE-RM-87-102 January 12, 1989 Washington, D.C.

Chief, Test 

### &Evaluation Program Conservation 

### &Renewable Energy REPRESENTING Quantum Optics, Inc. Office of Rep. Claudine Schneider University of Maine Dow Chemical U.S.A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Resource Defense Council ****** 

### L U N C H ****** Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers Solar Energy Research Institute California Energy Commission 10. Ray Bohman Association of Home Appl iance 

## UVJr Manufacturers 11. Margaret Gardner Northwest Power Planning Council TIME 9:30- 9:40

9:40-10:00 10:05-10:25 10:30-10:50 10:55-11:15 11 :20-11:40 11:45-12:D5 12:05- 1:00

1:10- 1:30 1:35- 1:55 2:00- 2:20 2:25- 2:45" 2:50- 3:10January 12, 1989

Public Hearing Page 2

SCHEDULED SPEAKERS
12. R. M. Schreck EPRESENTING General Electric Company IME 3:15- :35 13. Howard Geller American Council for An 3:40- 4:00 14. Allen Wilkins Energy-Efficient Economy Sub-Zero Freezer Company, Inc. 4:05- 4:25 15. Andrew Takacs Whirlpool Corporation 4:30- 4:50

-andLeo Soorus January 12, 1989 Public Hearing Page 2

SCHEDULED SPEAKERS 12. R. M. Schreck 13. Howard Ge11e r 14. Allen Wilkins 15. Andrew Takacs-andLeo Soorus REPRESENTING TIME General Electric Company 3:15- 3:35 American Counci 1 for An 3:40- 4:00 Energy-Efficient Economy Sub-Zero Freezer Company, Inc. 4:05- 4:25 Whirlpool Corporation 4:30- 4:50
§ 54.05 Form and contents of notice. ( a ) The notice required to institute an allotment under this part must be given in the form of a court order, letters, or other document issued by a person specified in § 54.03.
( b ) The notice must: ( 1 ) Provide the full name, social security number, and duty station of the member who owes the support obligation;
( 2 ) Specify the amount of support due, and the period in which it has remained owing;
( 3 ) Be accompanied by a certified copy of an order directing the payment of this support issued: ( i ) By a court of competent jurisdiction, or;
( ii ) In accordance with an administrative procedure which is established by State law, affords substantial due process, and is subject to judicial review;
( 4 ) Provide the full name, social security number, and mailing address of the person to whom the allotment is to be paid;
( 5 ) Identify the period in which the allotment is to remain in effect; and
( 6 ) Identify the name and birth date of all children for whom support is to be provided under the allotment.
( c ) Each notice must be accompanied by the following information: ( 1 ) For each administrative order, a copy of all provisions of state law governing its issuance.
( 2 ) For each court order and for each administrative order, if not stated in the support order: ( i ) An explanation as to how personal jurisdiction was obtained over the member; and
( ii ) A statement on the age of majority in the state law, with appropriate legal citations.
#### § 89.1 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Inland Rules* refers to the Inland Navigation Rules contained in the Inland Navigational Rules Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-591) and the technical annexes established under that act.

*A vessel of special construction or purpose* means a vessel designed or modified to perform a special function and whose arrangement is thereby made relatively inflexible.

*Interference with the special function of the vessel* occurs when installation or use of lights, shapes, or sound-signaling appliances under the Inland Rules prevents or significantly hinders the operation in which the vessel is usually engaged.

[CGD 80-157, 47 FR 13801, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended by CGD 83-028, 49 FR 33876, Aug. 27, 1984]
|  Onvia, Inc.2011 Management Incentive Plan  |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|  Participants                                    |  Executive Officers of Onvia, Inc., other than Sales Executives   |
|   Objectives                                |  · Achieve corporate performance that most reflect stockholder interests· Drive and reward unified performance across executive team· Focus on building trend for long-term, profitable growth  |
|  Key Achievement Metrics                    |  Achievement of Board defined goals including without limitation Bookings, Net Income, EBITDA and cash flow. |
|  Bonus Target                                    |  Between 22% - 80% of Base Salary for Participants  |
|  Overachievement                                 |  If the Company’s performance against the Key Achievement Metrics exceeds the target goals established by the Board, the Board has established accelerators to modify the Participants’ award levels.  |
|  Terms of Funding and Payment                    |  · If the Company’s performance falls below the Key Achievement Metrics floor established by the Board, the bonus pool shall not be funded.· Bonus pool to be funded and targets paid upon certification by the Compensation Committee of metrics achieved by the Company.  |
Exhibit 15.1




May 7, 2010




Aceto Corporation


Lake Success, New York




We are aware that Aceto Corporation and subsidiaries has incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-149586, No. 33-38679, No. 333-90929, and No. 333-110653) our report dated May 7, 2010,relating to the Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements appearing in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Pursuant to Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. It should be noted that we have not performed any procedures subsequent to May 7, 2010.




/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP




Melville, New York
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4814

To make illegal the sale, share, or transfer of information acquired on the

Internet with a pledge that it would not be released.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 10, 2000

Mr. BACHUS (for himself and Mr. DELAHUNT) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To make illegal the sale, share, or transfer of information

acquired on the Internet with a pledge that it would

not be released.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SALE OF PRIVATE INFORMATION.

4 It shall be considered an unfair practice in or affect5 ing commerce which violates section 5 of the Federal

6 Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) for a person to sell

7 on the Internet information such person acquired with a

8 pledge that the information would be kept private and not
2

•HR 4814 IH

1 released or for a person to share or transfer to another

2 such information on the Internet.

Æ
§ 84.03 Horizontal positioning and spacing of lights. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (e) of this section, when two masthead lights are prescribed for a power-driven vessel, the horizontal distance between them must not be less than one quarter of the length of the vessel but need not be more than 50 meters. The forward light must be placed not more than one half of the length of the vessel from the stem.
( b ) On a power-driven vessel of 20 meters or more in length the sidelights shall not be placed in front of the forward masthead lights. They shall be placed at or near the side of the vessel.
( c ) When the lights prescribed in Rule 27(b)(i) (§ 83.27(b)(i) of this chapter) are placed vertically between the forward masthead light(s) and the after masthead light(s), these all-round lights shall be placed at a horizontal distance of not less than 2 meters from the fore and aft centerline of the vessel in the athwartship direction.
( d ) When only one masthead light is prescribed for a power-driven vessel, this light must be exhibited forward of amidships. For a vessel of less than 20 meters in length, the vessel shall exhibit one masthead light as far forward as is practicable.
( e ) On power-driven vessels 50 meters but less than 60 meters in length operated on the Western Rivers, and those waters specified in § 89.25 of this chapter, the horizontal distance between masthead lights shall not be less than 10 meters.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 9:23 AM

To: 'rbrown@i2corp.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Informatio n: Innovative Imaging & Research



### June 4, 2015

Dear Mr. Brown:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0973). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e., fixed-wing, roto rcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description shoul d include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by June 4, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we w ill close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

N.Y.Z. CONSTRUCTION

, LLC,

Appellant

,

v

.

ZOOM INSPECTIONS SERVICES,

INC.

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 100

- CV

Appeal from the

205 th District Court

o f El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2017DCV4142 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, N.Y.Z. Construction

, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because Appellant

no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P

. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party incurring them

. T EX .R.A PP .P.

42.1(d).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

August 15 , 2018

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
### THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON DC 20590

The Honorable Charles E. Grassley United States Senate · Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Grassley: July 17, 2012

Thank you for your letter supporting the proposal submitted by Sioux City for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small CommunityAir Service Development Program. The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of40 grant awards each year, although no more than 4 awards may be to communities in the same State. In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofprojects that can be funded. On May 15, the Department issued an order requesting that communities interested in receiving a grant this year file their applications by June 11. As these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits ofany particular proposal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. As is our normal practice, I am placing <>.,.,......., ofyour letter and this·**"'"1-'v~,..,** DOT-OST-2012-0069 as a co record ofthis matter. I your interest in this program.,:

'o;·'·• ·_,I••'



### .. , . -· '

I :.r,

. , ....-

. · lSD**1~T** A<.O.tl,:i**!'~!:** ·_;l·.r(**1:?~** C;.U1\n**il..""~f'rCJ~.** lA 52401 :J1aiJC:3·GOJ2 

### The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: Lli,:>.FtlfS E. GRI\SSLEY
1 NASHINGTON, DC :?0510-150i 

### :\Jay3L2012 :.. ·, tJ J' S•rr::r

. •' '·, i**I~** c,! i'! l,-!.:. :

.'! J**·--~** ·<I r.t·. :, t.::• "'·\': < . _;1 (
. ·'. ::,, ' ;

'- 13t \'\c.t 3r.{')$ff':H'f S 1-'ilr:. lCO :)."'-1**(!,f'C,-::.T.It~ 52801-141~** **i~-C.?-1 ~2:!-·t~Jl** 

. .: J07 i-rtJtf'N BtHLCiN(. 3 SoutH GTH SrnEET ContJC!l**6LurF~.IA** 51501-4204 i1 'l2t**~::!~-710~**



### I was recently contacted by the City ofSioux City regarding the Small Community Air Service Development Program application it 

### recently submitted. I ask that this application be given all due consideq1tion. Any information or assistance you could provide me with respect to this issue would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time and effort on this matter. IfI may be ofany assistance with this application, please contact my office at 202-224-3744.

CEG/sk

P.ANI(ING illlEMOEfl, JUDICIARY 

### Sincel'cly,

# ~ .

### t:~ 

# lp 9 

# l t .

# ut~vv~e.**~~** Charles E. Grassley 

# r United States Senator

Committee Asstgnrnents:**Alii~ICULTUP.E** BUDGET flflft.NCE Co·CIIAIP.MAN,**11\JTEI~NA**TI0!\1/l,L NARCOTICS CONTriOL C.<\UCUS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
STEPHEN MIZNER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2516 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed May 29, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Debra Johnes Riva, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14479]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec. 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on April 19, 2000, and April 27, 
2000, Organichem Corporation, 33 Riverside Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 
12144, made application by letters to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100)...........................................         II
Pentobarbital (2270).........................................         II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture amphetamine and pentobarbital as a 
bulk product for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than August 7, 2000.

    Dated: May 25, 2000.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-14479 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
```
Case 1:22-mj-02923-MD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2022 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Eight Dragons Company
File No. 0-28453

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Eight Dragons  Company (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, Glenn A. Little,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: January 29, 2008                          By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      ----------------                             -----------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Eight Dragons  Company and will be retained by Eight Dragons Company
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:22-cv-23223-DPG Document 11-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2023 Page 1 of 3
1

4854-2578-0813.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

Case No.: 1:22-cv-23223-GAYLES

VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC., a

Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

EXOTIC V’S BEAUTY BAR AND SPA, 

a California company, and VICTORIA

NABORNE, an individual,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ENTRY OF CLERK’S DEFAULT AS TO DEFENDANTS

I, David M. Robbins, Esq., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney at Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP and represent Plaintiff, 

Venus Concept USA, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), in the above-referenced action, and I am familiar with the 

file, records, and pleadings in this matter.

2. On August 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed a five-count complaint (the “Complaint”) against 

Defendants, Exotic V’s Beauty Bar and Spa and Victoria Naborne.

3. On April 3, 2023, Defendants were served the summons, a copy of the Complaint, 

and all other initial filings in this case. See ECF Nos. 8, 9.

4. A response to the Complaint from Defendants was due on April 24, 2023.

5. Defendants have failed to appear, plead, or otherwise defend within the time 

allowed and, therefore, are now in default.

6. Plaintiff requests that the Clerk of the Court enter defaults against Defendants.

Case 1:22-cv-23223-DPG Document 11-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2023 Page 2 of 3
2

4854-2578-0813.1

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on May 5, 2023.

/s/ David Robbins _____________

David Robbins

Case 1:22-cv-23223-DPG Document 11-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2023 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5103 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5103

                For the relief of Pierre Lyn Ladouceur.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

  Mr. Owens introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Pierre Lyn Ladouceur.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR PIERRE LYN LADOUCEUR.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Pierre Lyn Ladouceur shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Pierre Lyn Ladouceur enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Pierre Lyn Ladouceur, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Pierre Lyn 
Ladouceur shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```