alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
On-Site Safety Checklist

Pre-flight

 Reviewed targeted area through Google Earth for any obstructions

 Reviewed area for any FAA restricted fly zones or other areas of concern

 Reviewed safety requirements with sponsor / owner (sign-off required back of form)

 Posted “Aerial Photography” in process sign at opening / curb

 Visit each neighbor to announce that aerial photography will be taking place

 Posted “Launch/Landing” zone sign calling for 50’ parameter

 Walked the hover area or path of flight to check for any areas on concern

Flight Set-up

 Advise anyone within “Launch/Landing” area of safety and 50’ requirement

 Unpack and check DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ for any visible signs of damage

 Turn on Remote Controller and observe that both power and Wi-Fi are green

 Ensure launch zone is clear and turn on DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ battery

 Toggle S1 & S2 switches five times to set GPS recalc & failsafe landing zone

 Wait for solid GPS lights (Solid Green slow flashing)

 Spin DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ 360o both Horizontal and Vertically to ensure lock

 Review Launch Site one last time before lift off

 Engage motors and start straight horizontal lift to desired altitude

Flight

 Monitor both GPS Lock (# satellites) / Battery Level every minute

 Watch for any changes to the “Launch/Landing” area of safety and advise as necessary

 Watch for any irregular craft behavior and land immediately if necessary

 Return the craft to the landing area within 20% of battery life

Post-Flight

 Announce that the craft is returning for landing

 Visual check that the 50’ rule is observed / Otherwise hover until 50’ is observed

 Slowly bring the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in for a landing

 Turn off Battery on Craft first, then the Remote Controller

 Store all equipment in their cases before allowing observes to approach
On-Site Safety Checklist

Sponsor / Owner Sign-off

As the sponsor or owner of this engagement you understand that 360 Sky Vision operates under the 

following rules and obligation to ensure the public safety and privacy, and that we follow all FAA rules 

and guidelines.

As the sponsor / owner of this engagement you agree to the following through your initial of each item 

and signature at the bottom of this page.

360 Sky Vision has advised you as to the following: Initial:

 We will not fly within 1 mile of FAA Restricted Zones

 We will not fly over 400’ of the current launch elevation

 We will not fly if a 50” Launch/Landing parameter cannot be established

 We will land the craft immediately of any technical issues occur

 We will land the craft if on-site activity occurs that presents a security concern

Privacy Concerns:

 If Neighbors have a privacy concern, we will not fly until it is resolved

 If pictures taken has a privacy concern, it will not be made available

Safety

 You agree to assist in the limiting of people within the launch/landing area

 You agree to assist in the support of all other identified safety areas

Safety Checklist Signatures

Sponsor / Owner

<Name and address is normally listed below>

360 Sky Vision LLC

James R Fitzpatrick

30 Oakwood Rd

Hopatcong, NJ 07843
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,240,778
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,567,389
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,000
<INVENTORY>                                    145,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,135,338
<PP&E>                                       2,542,839
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,318,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,168,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,513,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,500,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       488,183
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,168,398
<SALES>                                      2,712,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,712,750
<CGS>                                        1,970,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  647,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                105,956
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             67,756
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,756
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.529 Safety Zone; Gallants Channel, Beaufort, NC. ( a ) *Definitions.* For the purposes of this section— *Captain of the Port* means the Commander, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina.
*Participant* means an individual or vessel involved with the Crystal Coast Triathlon.
*Representative* means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
( b ) *Location.* The following area is a safety zone: all navigable waters of Gallants Channel from the Route 70 Bridge in Beaufort, NC, at N 34°43′38′′, W 076°40′04′′ then North-West to Russel Slough Channel Day-Beacon 10 (LLNR34860) at N 34°43′58′′, W 076°40′27.5′′.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) The general regulations governing safety zones in § 165.23 apply to the area described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) With the exception of the participants, entry into or remaining in this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP, Sector North Carolina or a designated representative.
( 3 ) No vessel may be present in the safety zone when it is subject to enforcement, and any vessel in violation of that prohibition must depart the zone immediately.
( 4 ) The COTP North Carolina can be reached through the Coast Guard Sector North Carolina Command Duty Officer, Wilmington, North Carolina, at telephone number 910-343-3882.
( 5 ) The Coast Guard can be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65 MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
( d ) *Enforcement.* The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
( e ) *Enforcement period.* This section will be enforced the second Saturday in May, from 8 a.m. through 10 a.m. The enforcement period may change, but a notice will be provided if there is a change in the enforcement period.
[USCG-2023-0050, 88 FR 30652, May 12, 2023]
# AGENCY:

 Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

 Proposed rule.

# SUMMARY:

 This document requests comments on a petition for rule making filed on behalf of Radio, Inc., licensee of Station KFIX(FM), Channel 245C2, Plainville, Kansas, seeking the substitution of Channel 245C1 for Channel 245C2 at Plainville, and modification of the license for Station KFIX(FM) accordingly. Additionally, to accommodate the proposed allotment of Channel 245C1 at Plainville, the Commission also proposes the substitution of Channel 255A for Channel 244A at Larned, Kansas, as requested, and modification of the license for Station KGTR(FM) to specify operation on the alternate Class A channel. Channel 245C1 can be allotted to Plainville in accordance with the minimum distance separation requirements of § 73.207(b) of the Commission's Rules at the licensed site of Station KFIX(FM) at coordinates 39-01-15 NL and 99-28-12 WL. Channel 255A can be allotted to Larned at the licensed site of Station KGTR(FM) at coordinates 38-09-54 NL and 99-06-05 WL.

# DATES:

 Comments must be filed on or before February 7, 2000, and reply comments on or before February 22, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

 Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Susan A. Marshall and Andrew S. Kersting, Esqs., Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, P.L.C., 1300 North Seventeenth Street, 11th Floor, Arlington, VA 22209.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 This is a synopsis of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 99-361, adopted December 8, 1999, and released December 17, 1999. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036, (202) 857-3800.

Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding.

                    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all                     *ex parte*                    contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible                     *ex parte*                    contacts.                

For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

# List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

- Radio Broadcasting

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 00-1471 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Jream Vision T.V. LLC

Account Holder: Jream Vision T.V. LLC

Account Signer(s): Maurice Shazier, Kim Shazier

Bank: Wells Fargo

Account #: 0316

Account Type: Business Choice Checking

Opened: 7/9/2015

Statements Rec'd: 1/1/2019 - 7/31/2022

Bank Account

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-44 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 20.403 Consolidation and severance. ( a ) A presiding ALJ may for good cause, with the approval of the Chief ALJ and with all parties given notice and opportunity to object, consolidate any matters at issue in two or more administrative proceedings docketed under this part. (Good cause includes the proceedings' possessing common parties, questions of fact, and issues of law and presenting the likelihood that consolidation would expedite the proceedings and serve the interests of justice.) The ALJ may not consolidate any matters if consolidation would prejudice any rights available under this part or impair the right of any party to place any matters at issue.
( b ) Unless directed otherwise by the Chief ALJ, a presiding ALJ may, either in response to a motion or on his or her own motion, for good cause, sever any administrative proceeding with respect to some or all parties, claims, and issues.
H. R. 5036

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to clarify the

areas included in the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park and

to authorize appropriations for that park.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dayton Aviation Heritage

Preservation Amendments Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE PRESERVATION

ACT OF 1992.

(a) AREAS INCLUDED IN PARK.—Section 101(b) of the Dayton

Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b))

is amended to read as follows:

‘‘(b) AREAS INCLUDED.—The park shall consist of the following

sites, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘Dayton Aviation

Heritage National Historical Park’, numbered 362–80,010 and dated

September 1, 2000:

‘‘(1) A core parcel in Dayton, Ohio, which shall consist

of the Wright Cycle Company building, Hoover Block, and

lands between.

‘‘(2) The Setzer building property (also known as the Aviation Trail building property), Dayton, Ohio.

‘‘(3) The residential properties at 26 South Williams Street

and at 30 South Williams Street, Dayton, Ohio.

‘‘(4) Huffman Prairie Flying Field, located at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

‘‘(5) The Wright 1905 Flyer III and Wright Hall, including

constructed additions and attached structures, known collectively as the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers Aviation

Center, Dayton, Ohio.

‘‘(6) The Paul Laurence Dunbar State Memorial, Dayton,

Ohio.’’.

(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 109 of such

Act (16 U.S.C. 410ww–8) is amended by striking the colon after

‘‘title’’ and all that follows through the end of the sentence and

inserting a period.
H. R. 5036—2

(c) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 107 of such Act (16 U.S.C.

410ww–6) is amended by striking ‘‘Secretary of Interior’’ and

inserting ‘‘Secretary of the Interior’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**Section 1350Certification**

 

 

In connection with this annual report of ML Select Futures I L.P. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I,Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  March 31, 2010     |                  |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                           |                  |
| By                             | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis               |                  |
| Chief Financial  Officer       |                  |
| (Principal  Financial Officer) |                  |
|                                |                       |  |

 

----
#### § 5.19 Disenrollment.

A member of the Auxiliary will be disenrolled on the member's request, upon ceasing to possess the qualifications for membership, for cause, or upon direction of the Commandant.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 113 (Monday, June 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36843-36844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14761]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-571 (Review)]


Professional Electric Cutting Tools From Japan

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Termination of five-year review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The subject five-year review was initiated in November 1999 to 
determine whether revocation of the existing antidumping duty order on 
professional electric cutting tools would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and of material injury to a 
domestic industry. On June 2, 2000, the Department of Commerce 
published notice that it was revoking the order ``[b]ecause the 
domestic interested parties have withdrawn, in full, their 
participation in the ongoing sunset review'' (65 FR 35324). 
Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject review is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 2, 2000.

[[Page 36844]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vera Libeau (202-205-3176), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).

    Authority: This review is being terminated under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.69 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR 
207.69).

    Issued: June 6, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14761 Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
§ 238.6 General policy. ( a ) Satisfactory resolution of water damage problems in urban areas often involves cooperation between local non-Federal interests and the Federal flood control agencies. In urban or urbanizing areas, provision of a basic drainage system to collect and convey the local runoff to a stream is a non-Federal responsibility. This regulation should not be interpreted to extend the flood damage reduction program into a system of pipes traditionally recognized as a storm drainage system. Flood damage reduction works generally address discharges that represent a serious threat to life and property. The decision criteria outlined below therefore exclude from consideration under flood control authorities small streams and ditches with carrying capacities typical of storm sewer pipes. Location of political boundaries will not be used as a basis for specifying project responsibility. Project responsibilities can be specified as follows: ( 1 ) Flood damage reduction works, as defined in this regulation, may be accomplished by the Corps of Engineers.
( 2 ) Construction of storm sewer systems and components thereof will be a non-Federal responsibility. Non-Federal interests have a responsibility to design storm sewer systems so that residual damages are reduced to an acceptable level.
( b ) Consideration will be given to the objectives and requirements of Executive Order 11988 (reference § 238.3(a)) and the general guidelines therefor by the U.S. Water Resources Council (reference § 238.3(b)).
Date 

(mm/dd)

Time

(HH:MM)

Operator 

Code

Flow In 

(gal)

Tur In 

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal)

count 0 0 hrs

DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0

0

Flow weighted average turbidity

0 Discharge during month of July

Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond C

System 1 PLC Data -July 2007
Flow Out 

(gpm)

Tur Out 

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal)

Tur Rec 

(NTU) pH Rec

0

NTU min 0.0

NTU max 0.0

hted average turbidity 0.0

pH min 0.00

pH max 0.00

rd Runway - Pond C

 Data -July 2007

Average pressure
Date 

(mm/dd)

Time

(HH:MM)

Operator 

Code

Flow In 

(gal)

Tur In 

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal)

count 0 0 hrs

DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0

0

Flow weighted average turbidity

0 Discharge during month of July

Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond C

System 2 PLC Data - July2007
Flow Out 

(gpm)

Tur Out 

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal)

Tur Rec 

(NTU) pH Rec

0

NTU min 0.0

NTU max 0.0

hted average turbidity 0.0

pH min 0.00

pH max 0.00

rd Runway - Pond C

 Data - July2007

Average pressure
Date 

(mm/dd)

Time

(HH:MM)

Operator 

Code

Flow In 

(gal)

Tur In 

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal)

Flow Out 

(gpm)

Tur Out 

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal)

Tur Rec 

(NTU) pH Rec

count 0 0 hrs

DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0 0

0 NTU min 0.0

NTU max 0.0

Flow weighted average turbidity 0.0

pH min 0.00

pH max 0.00

0 Discharge during month of July

Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond G

System 1 PLC Data - July 2007

Average pressure
Date 

(mm/dd)

Time

(HH:MM)

Operator 

Code

Flow In 

(gal)

Tur In 

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal)

count 0 4 0 hrs

DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0

0

Flow weighted average turbidity

0 Discharge during month of July

Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond G

System 2 PLC Data -July 2007
Flow Out 

(gpm)

Tur Out 

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal)

Tur Rec 

(NTU) pH Rec

0

NTU min 0.0

NTU max 0.0

hted average turbidity 0.0

pH min 0.00

pH max 0.00

rd Runway - Pond G

 Data -July 2007

Average pressure
Date 

(mm/dd)

Time

(HH:MM)

Operator 

Code

Flow In 

(gal)

Tur In 

(NTU) pH In Flow Out (gal)

count 0 0 hrs

DAILY SUMMARY: Gallons discharged 0

0

Flow weighted average turbidity

0 Discharge during month of July

Sea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond 

System 3 PLC Data - July 2007
Flow Out 

(gpm)

Tur Out 

(NTU) pH Out Flow Rec (gal)

Tur Rec 

(NTU) pH Rec Press In (PSI)

0

0

NTU min 0.0

NTU max 0.0

hted average turbidity 0.0

pH min 0.00

pH max 0.00

Average pressure

ea-Tac Airport 3rd Runway - Pond G

System 3 PLC Data - July 2007
Press 

Out (PSI)

P 

(PSI)

0 0
#### § 230.24 Agency decision points.

The timing and processing of NEPA documents in relation to major decision points are addressed in paragraphs 11 and 14 and appendix A for studies and projects and 33 CFR part 320 through 330 for regulatory actions.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00328-CV

Michael IDROGO,

Appellant

v.

Sarah GARRAHAN, Et al.,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-12389

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On May 27, 2015, Michael Idrogo filed a notice of appeal. In his notice of appeal, he 

complains of the trial court failing to rule on his motion for default judgment. Nowhere in the 

notice of appeal does appellant refer to a final, appealable order signed by the trial court. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)

(explaining that a judgment or order is final for purposes of appeal if it actually disposes of all 

pending parties and claims before the court). Nor does appellant point to an appealable

interlocutory order. See, e.g., TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. ' 51.014. Thus, it does not 

appear from appellant’s notice of appeal that we have jurisdiction over this appeal. 

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to show cause in writing by June 22, 2015 why this 

appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We suspend all appellate deadlines 

pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court