alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register: January 7, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 4)]
[Notices]               
[Page 968]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07ja10-20]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 
Notice of Public Information Collections Being Reviewed by the 
U.S. Agency for International Development; Comments Requested

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is making 
efforts to reduce the paperwork burden. USAID invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following proposed and/or continuing information collections, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are requested 
concerning: (a) Whether the proposed or continuing collections of 
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions 
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance 
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the 
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.

DATES: Submit comments on or before March 8, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments via e-mail at tHembry@usaid.gov or mail 
comments to: Tracy Hembry, Small Disadvantage Business Specialist, 
United States Agency for International Development, Ronald Reagan 
Building, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20523 (202-712-
4983).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Johnson, Bureau for 
Management, Office of Administrative Services, Information and Records 
Division, U.S. Agency for International Development, Room 2.07-106, 
RRB, Washington, DC 20523, (202) 712-1365 or via e-mail 
bjohnson@usaid.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB No.: OMB 0412-New.
    Form No.: N/A.
    Title: Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program Post Agreement.
    Type of Review: New.
    Purpose: The required annual report will be used to determine if 
the mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] agreement is meeting its milestones 
outlined in the original agreement package, and the effect of the 
mentoring on the prot[eacute]g[eacute].

Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 30.
    Total annual responses: 30.
    Total annual hours requested: 360.

    Dated: December 29, 2009.
Cynthia Staples,
Acting Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of 
Administrative Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. E9-31400 Filed 1-6-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
```
§ 183.435 Conductors in circuits of 50 volts or more. ( a ) Each conductor in a circuit that has a nominal voltage of 50 volts or more must be: ( 1 ) A conductor that has insulation listed and classified moisture resistant and flame retardant in Article 310, NFPA No. 70, National Electric Code;
( 2 ) A flexible cord type SO, STO, ST, SJO, SJT, or SJTO listed in Article 400, NFPA No. 70, National Electric Code;
( 3 ) A conductor that meets IEEE Standard 45.
( 4 ) A conductor that meets UL Standard 1426.
( b ) Where the nominal circuit voltage of each of three or more current carrying conductors in a duct, bundle, or cable is 50 volts or more, the amperages of each of those conductors must not exceed the value in table 5 multiplied by the correction factor in note 2 to Table 5 for the number of conductors that carry 50 volts or more.
( c ) This section does not apply to communication systems; electronic navigation equipment; resistance conductors that control circuit amperage; conductors in secondary circuits of ignition systems; and pigtails of less than seven inches of exposed length.
[CGD 73-217, 42 FR 5944, Jan. 31, 1977; 42 FR 24739, May 16, 1977, as amended by CGD 80-047 and CGD 80-046, 45 FR 85450, Dec. 29, 1980; CGD 87-009, 53 FR 36972, Sept. 23, 1988]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5036

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to clarify

the areas included in the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical

Park and to authorize appropriations for that park.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. HALL of Ohio (for himself and Mr. HOBSON) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act

of 1992 to clarify the areas included in the Dayton

Aviation Heritage National Historical Park and to authorize appropriations for that park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dayton Aviation Herit5 age Preservation Amendments Act of 2000’’.
2

•HR 5036 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVISION OF DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE PRES2 ERVATION ACT OF 1992.

3 (a) AREAS INCLUDED IN PARK.—Section 101(b) of

4 the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992

5 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)) is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘(b) AREAS INCLUDED.—The park shall consist of

7 the following sites, as generally depicted on a map entitled

8 ‘‘Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park’’,

9 numbered ll and dated ll:

10 ‘‘(1) A core parcel in Dayton, Ohio, which shall

11 consist of the Wright Cycle Company building, Hoo12 ver Block, and lands between.

13 ‘‘(2) The Setzer building property (also known

14 as the Aviation Trail building property), Dayton,

15 Ohio.

16 ‘‘(3) The residential properties at 26 South

17 Williams Street and at 30 South Williams Street,

18 Dayton, Ohio.

19 ‘‘(4) Huffman Prairie Flying Field, located at

20 Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

21 ‘‘(5) The Wright 1905 Flyer III and Wright

22 Hall, including constructed additions and attached

23 structures, known collectively as the John W. Berry,

24 Sr. Wright Brothers Aviation Center, Dayton, Ohio.

25 ‘‘(6) The Paul Laurence Dunbar State Memo26 rial, Dayton, Ohio.’’.
3

•HR 5036 IH

1 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

2 109 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 410ww–8) is amended by

3 striking the colon after ‘‘title’’ and all that follows through

4 the end of the sentence and inserting a period.

5 (c) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 107 of such

6 Act (16 U.S.C. 410ww–6) is amended by striking ‘‘Sec7 retary of Interior’’ and inserting ‘‘Secretary of the Inte8 rior’’.

Æ
#### JAMES V. SCHENCK, Appellant, *v.*DANIEL P. INGRAHAM, Jr., and others, Respondents.

*Receiver—payment iy, of unfounded claims*— *confirmed iy order of the court*— *remedy of m'editor.*

When the evidence establishes the fact that claims, allowed and paid out of funds in the hands of a receiver by an order of the court, are fictitious and unfounded, the proper proceeding by a creditor of the fund is to apply to be made a parly to the suit in which the order was made, and to have such order vacated; for in ■ such proceeding the court has a wider discretion and greater power for relief than in an independent action depending for its success upon satisfactory proof of fraud.

*68Appeal from an order denying a motion to have certain orders, directing the distribution of funds in the hands of a receiver, and discharging such receiver, set aside and vacated.

The defendant Ingraham was appointed receiver in an action to ■ settle up certain partnership affairs, and paid, as was claimed on this application, and as the General Term, was of opinion, exorbitant fees to his counsel, and retained an improper sum for his own services, which acts were done, as the plaintiff claimed, in pursuance of a fraudulent agreement between the receiver and his counsel.

*Adam C. Ellis,*for the appellant.

*John E. Burrill,*for the respondent Ingraham.

Opinion by

Daniels, J.

Davis, P. J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWind-Tunnel Investigation of a Full-Scale Canard-Configured General Aviation AirplaneAn investigation was conducted in the Langley 30- by 60-Foot Tunnel to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of a powered, full-scale model of a general aviation airplane employing a canard. Although primary emphasis of the investigation was placed on evaluating the aerodynamic performance and the stability and control characteristics of the basic configuration, tests were also conducted to study the following effects of varying the basic configuration: effect of Reynolds number; effect of canard; effect of outboard wing leading-edge droop; effect of center-of-gravity location; effect of elevator trim; effect of landing gear; effect of lateral-directional control; effect of power; effect of fixed transition; effect of water spray; effects of canard incidence, canard airfoil section, and canard position; and effects of winglets and upper winglet size. Additional aspects of the study were to determine the boundary-layer transition characteristics of airfoil surfaces and the effect of fixing the boundary layer to be turbulent by means of a transition strip near the leading edge. The tests were conducted at Reynolds numbers from 0.60 x 10 to the 6th power to 2.25x10 to the 6th power, based on the wing mean aerodynamic chord, at angles of attack from -4.5 deg to 41.5 deg, and at angles of sideslip from -15 deg to 15 deg.Document ID19850011615Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsYip, L. P.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2382L-15744NASA-TP-2382Accession Number85N19925Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-45-43-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850011615.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 151.53 Special areas for Annex V of MARPOL 73/78. ( a ) For the purposes of §§ 151.51 through 151.77, the special areas are the Mediterranean Sea area, the Baltic Sea area, the Black Sea area, the Red Sea area, the Gulfs area, the North Sea area, the Antarctic area, and the Wider Caribbean region, including the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea which are described in § 151.06.
( b ) In accordance with paragraph 3.2 of Regulation 8 of Annex V of MARPOL, the discharge restrictions in § 151.71 for special areas will enter into effect when each party to MARPOL whose coastline borders the special area has certified that reception facilities are available and the IMO has established an effective date for each special area. Notice of the effective dates for the discharge requirements in each special area will be published in the Federal Register and reflected in this section.
( c ) The discharge restrictions are in effect in the Wider Caribbean Region, the Mediterranean Sea, the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the Gulfs, and the Antarctic special areas.
[CGD 94-056, 60 FR 43378, Aug. 21, 1995, as amended by USCG-2009-0273, 74 FR 66241, Dec. 15, 2009; USCG-2011-0187, 77 FR 19543, Apr. 2, 2012; USCG-2012-1049, 78 FR 13491, Feb. 28, 2013]
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Ameri-First Financial Group, Inc.
File No. 0-28453

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ameri-First  Financial Group,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Glenn
A. Little,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: February 22, 2007                      By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      -----------------                         --------------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Ameri-First   Financial  Group,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by
Ameri-First  Financial Group,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Argued and submitted March 31,

affirmed October 14, 1992

#### ANTHONY J. CLUBB, *Petitioner, v.*BOARD OF PAROLE, *Respondent.*

(CA A68144)

838 P2d 1112

Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Yuanxing Chen, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

*536Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

RIGGS, J.

*537RIGGS, J.

Petitioner was convicted of first degree robbery in 1982 and received a 7-year sentence. In 1986, he pled guilty to second degree burglary committed while on parole. The court imposed a 5-year sentence for the burglary, with “[petitioner] to serve a minimum of one (1) year of said sentence, to be served consecutively with any sentence imposed in defendant’s parole revocation.”1 Petitioner was subsequently paroled and rearrested for parole violations. After a hearing to set his parole release date on the burglary sentence, the Board Action Form (BAF) stated that his sentence expiration date was May 23, 1994.

Petitioner’s sole assignment of error is that the Board “erred in finding petitioner’s sentence expiration date as 5/23/1994.” He asks us to remand to the Board with instructions to correct the sentence expiration date. We cannot do that. The Department of Corrections, not the Board, is responsible for establishing the sentence expiration date. ORS 137.320. The Board is not even required to include the sentence expiration date on the BAF. *See*OAR 255-30-055(2). Consequently, even if the state sentence expiration date is incorrect, and we do not say that it is, the Board could not remedy the alleged error. A challenge to the sentence expiration date must be made to the Department of Corrections. Moreover, because there is no evidence in the record suggesting that the Department of Corrections calculated a different sentence expiration date than the one reflected on the BAF, we cannot say that Board erred in “finding” that that is petitioner’s sentence expiration date, if that is a finding at all.

Affirmed.

1

 There is no indication in the record that petitioner challenged this sentence.
#### § 334.860 San Diego Bay, Calif., Naval Amphibious Base; restricted area.

(a) *The Area.* The water of the Pacific Ocean in Middle San Diego Bay in an area extending from the northern and eastern boundary of the Naval Amphibious Base about 0.1 nautical miles and 0.6 nautical miles from the southern shoreline and basically outlined as follows:

| Station | Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 32°40′33.0′′ N | 117°10′02.4′′ W |
| 2 | 32°40′34.7′′ N | 117°09′54.0′′ W |
| 3 | 32°40′46.0′′ N | 117°09′44.2′′ W |
| 4 | 32°41′00.0′′ N | 117°09′24.6′′ W |
| 5 | 32°40′20.0′′ N | 117°08′36.7′′ W |
| 6 | 32°40′00.0′′ N | 117°09′00.0′′ W |
| 7 | 32°39′18.0′′ N | 117°08′45.0′′ W |
| 8 | 32°39′16.0′′ N | 117°08′48.5′′ W |

(b) *The regulations.*

(1) Swimming, fishing, waterskiing, mooring or anchoring shall not be allowed within the restricted area.

(2) A portion of the restricted area extending 120 feet from pierheads and from the low water mark on shore where piers do not exist is closed to all persons and vessels except those owned by, under hire to, or performing work for, the Naval Amphibious Base.

(3) All vessels entering the restricted area shall proceed across the area by the most direct route and without unnecessary delay. For vessels under sail, necessary tacking shall constitute a direct route.

(4) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, Naval Amphibious Base, Coronado, California, and such agencies as he/she shall designate. Organized activities (such as sail races and regattas) within the restricted area may be allowed providing that a request has been made to the Commanding Officer, Naval Amphibious Base, Coronado, San Diego, California 92155 or by calling, telephone number (619) 522-4833 at least 10 days prior to the event.

[49 FR 49453, Dec. 20, 1984. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5257

To establish a term limit of ten years for the Director of the Census,

and to provide that an individual may not serve more than one term

as the Director.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 2000

Mr. MILLER of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To establish a term limit of ten years for the Director

of the Census, and to provide that an individual may

not serve more than one term as the Director.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF 10-YEAR TERM LIMIT FOR

4 THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENSUS; LIMITATION

5 ON APPOINTMENT TO ONE TERM.

6 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF TERM LIMITS.—Section 21

7 of title 13, United States Code, is amended by inserting

8 ‘‘, for a period of ten years. An individual may not serve

9 more than one term as Director’’ after ‘‘Senate’’.
2

•HR 5257 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a) shall apply with respect to an appointment of

3 the Director of the Census made on or after the date of

4 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32


     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                     AS REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal  year ended  September  30,  2004 (the  "Report")  of Genio  Group,  Inc.
("Genio") as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on February 17,
2005, the undersigned,  in his capacity as an officer of Genio, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Genio Group, Inc.

Dated:  February 17, 2005

                                          /s/ Matthew J. Cohen
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Matthew J. Cohen
                                          Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement  required by 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350
has been  provided  to Cadence  Resources  Corporation  and will be  retained by
Cadence  Resources  Corporation  and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
AFS-10-345-E Aug 31 2010

Exemption No. 9755A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-24996

Ms. Mindy Waham Flight Operations Compliance Manager Alaska Airlines, Inc.

P.O. Box 68900 Seattle, WA 98168

Dear Ms. Waham:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9755. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated July 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (Alaska), for an extension of Exemption No. 9755. That exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Alaska to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman or aircrew program designee for an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Alaska.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9755 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9755 to September 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9755 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9755.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Project No.: AFS-10-345-E