alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ENERGEN CORPORATION FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000277595
<NAME> ENERGEN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      280,688
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    260,346
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         146,648
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        14,689
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 702,371
<COMMON>                                           131
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      143,251
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            125,086
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 268,468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           194,622
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             121,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,855
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 116,426
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  702,371
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      279,944
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            7,374
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      230,391
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     237,765
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         49,553
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               (8,471)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  44,509
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         10,801
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,708
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   33,708
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         7,285
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           7,977
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          3,551
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.82
        

</TABLE>
§ 3021.10 Starting an appeal. ( a ) A Postal Service decision to close or consolidate a post office may be appealed only by a person served by that office. An appeal is commenced by submitting a Petition for Review to the Postal Regulatory Commission.
( b ) The Petition for Review must state that the person(s) submitting it is/are served by the post office that the Postal Service has decided to close or consolidate. The petition should include the name(s) and address(es) of the person(s) filing it and the name or location of the post office to be closed or consolidated. A petitioner may include other information deemed pertinent.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 108 (Monday, June 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14151]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: June 13, 2000; 9:00 a.m.

Place: RFE/RL, Inc., Room 546, Vinohradska 1, 110 00 Prague 1, Prague, 
Czech Republic.

Closed Meeting: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)). 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6)).

Contact Person for more Information: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact either Brenda Hardnett or John Lindburg 
at (202) 401-3736.

    Dated: June 1, 2000.
John A. Lindburg,
Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-14151 Filed 6-1-00; 2:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
NUMBER 13-14-00307-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

ANA DEISI MARTINEZ BANOS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 92nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was originally due on September 29, 2014. Counsel filed a 

motion for extension of time until December 22, 2014, which was granted by the Court. 

On January 15, 2015, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s counsel that the brief had 

not been filed and requested that a response concerning the failure to file the brief be 

filed within ten days. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response or an 

appellate brief in this matter.
2

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make 

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether 

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a 

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant 

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should 

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that 

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to 

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant 

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and 

state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record 

of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
3

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

17th day of February, 2015.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Park Service (NPS) is converting and update its current system of internal instructions. When these documents contain new policy or procedural requirements that may affect parties outside the NPS, this information is being made available for public review and comment. Draft Director's Order #19 establishes a comprehensive policy to guide the NPS records management program. 

# DATES:

Written comments will be accepted until July 13, 2000.

# ADDRESSES:

Draft Director's Order #19 is available . Requests for copies and written comments should be sent to Michael Grimes, National Park Service, Washington Administrative Program Center, 1849 C Street, NW, MS 3316, Washington, DC, 20240. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Grimes, (202) 208-4333. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The NPS is revising the policies and procedures that direct the management of its records. To accomplish this, the records management policies in NPS-19, Records Management are rescinded. The new policies and procedures will be issued in Director's Order #19, in conformance with the new system of NPS internal guidance documents. 

Dated May 30, 2000. 

Michael A. Grimes,

Service-wide Records Officer.

[FR Doc. 00-14679 Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
```

[House Report 111-120]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    111-120

======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE BILL 
  (H.R. 627) TO AMEND THE TRUTH IN LENDING ACT TO ESTABLISH FAIR AND 
TRANSPARENT PRACTICES RELATING TO THE EXTENSION OF CREDIT UNDER AN OPEN 
            END CONSUMER CREDIT PLAN, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

May 19, 2009.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Ms. Pingree, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 456]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 456, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 
amendment to H.R. 627, the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights 
Act of 2009. The resolution makes in order a motion by the 
Chairman of the Committee on Financial Services to concur in 
the Senate amendment. The resolution waives all points of order 
against the motion except clause 10 of rule XXI. The resolution 
provides that the Senate amendment and the motion shall be 
considered as read. The resolution provides one hour of debate 
on the motion equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 
Services. The resolution provides that the question of adoption 
of the motion shall be divided for a separate vote on 
concurring in section 512 of the Senate amendment. The 
resolution further provides that if either portion of the 
divided question fails of adoption, then the House shall be 
considered to have made no disposition of the Senate amendment. 
The resolution provides that House Resolution 450 is laid on 
the table.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    Although the rule waives all points of order against 
consideration of the motion (except for clause 10 of rule XXI) 
the Committee is not aware of any points of order against the 
motion. The waiver of all points of order against the motion is 
prophylactic.

                                  

```
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1
                       AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORPORATION
          COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Three Months
                                   Ended March 31,                         Years Ended December 31,
                              -------------------------    ---------------------------------------------------------
                                  2005        2004            2004        2003       2002       2001       2000
                              -------------------------    ---------------------------------------------------------
<S>                            <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Earnings:
Net income                     $     95      $    57         $   234     $   260    $   228    $   277    $   286
Income tax provision                  9           30              75         135        118        140        150
Interest expense                    261          200             863         852        916      1,458      1,459
                              -------------------------    ---------------------------------------------------------

Total earnings (a)             $    365      $   287         $ 1,172     $ 1,247    $ 1,262    $ 1,875    $ 1,895
                              =========================    =========================================================

Fixed charges -
   interest expense (b)        $    261      $   200         $   863     $   852    $   916    $ 1,458    $ 1,459
                              =========================    =========================================================

Ratio of earnings
   to fixed charges (a/b)          1.40         1.43            1.36        1.46       1.38       1.29       1.30
</TABLE>



Note: Gross rentals on long-term leases were minimal in amount in each of the
periods shown.
Ex-99.1 a)

                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
of GMAC Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about GMAC Mortgage Corporation and its
subsidiaries' (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards
("standards") identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS ("USAF") as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2001 included in the accompanying management
assertion (see Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based
on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 7, 2002
#### § 187.3 What vessels are affected by this part?

Only vessels numbered or titled by a participating State are affected by this part. Vessels documented under 46 U.S.C. chapter 121 and 46 CFR parts 67 and 68 are not affected.
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.50-45 Thirteenth Coast Guard District. ( a ) *Description.* See § 3.65-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Line of demarcation.* There is no line of demarcation prescribed for this District. When required, it will be determined in accordance with § 67.01-20.
[CGFR 58-17, 23 FR 3377, May 20, 1958, as amended by CGFR 62-25, 27 FR 8733, Aug. 31, 1962]
PO Box 789 • 319 N Raleigh Ave • Sheffield, Alabama 35660 • (256) 320-2311 • info@wellspringadv.com • wellspringadv.com Wellspring Advertising PO Box 789 | 319 N. Raleigh Ave. Sheffield, AL 35660 (256) 320.2311 • keith@wellspringadv.com

U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration

October 30, 2015

Exemption request pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations from: 14 CFR 21 subpart H; 14 CFR 45.23(b); 14 CFR 61.113(a) and (b); 14 CFR 91.7(a); 14 CFR 91.9(b)(2); 14 CFR 91.109; 14 CFR 91.119(C); 14 CFR 91.121; 14 CFR 91.151(a); 14 CFR 91.203(a) and (b); 14 CFR 91.405(a); 14 CFR 91.407(a)(1); 14 CFR 91.409(a)(1) and (2); 14 CFR 91.417(a) and (b)

Pursuant to Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 CFR Part 11, Keith A. Sims, owner of Epiphany Group LLC (d/b/a Wellspring Advertising) which owns and operates an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS), hereby applies for an exemp

tion from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) to allow commercial operation of its UAS, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333.

(PILOT IN CHARGE) PIC INFORMATION

The UAS will only be flown by company owner and Private Pilot, Keith A. Sims

- 319 N. Raleigh Ave., Sheffield, AL 35660 - PPSEL with approximately 800 hours as PIC
- CN 3120257 Issued Dec 21, 2005 - Sims has approximately 25 hours as UAS PIC

FLIGHT SAFETY

PIC Keith A. Sims, has always flown the UAS with attention to safety . Sims uses a transceiver to monitor local aircraft and can communicate location information to aircraft if need be. Sims, as a Private Pilot, is familiar with airspace regulations and adheres to regulations of operation near public & private airports / strips, MOA and TFR notices.

- The UAS will always be flown using VLOS rules and a Visual Observer (VO) will be used for any commercial operations

- The UAS uses GPS, so in the case of a LOS (Loss of Signal) the UAS will r eturn to launch location

- The UAS is inspected prior to each flight for operational systems, structural or r otor damage (that may result in control issues), and general air worthiness

- The airspace is monitored at all times with via transceiver; PIC can communicate any information to area air traffic, tower or center

- All observers (general public, clients, etc.) are instructed to maintain a safe distance from UAS

- Liability Insurance for property damage / injury is current and valid (AMA Member 1075060) **Shell Docket FAA-2007-0001**
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

March 23, 2005

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 03-3982

LAWRENCE DALTON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

DEIRDRE BATTAGLIA, Warden,

Stateville Correctional Center,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 97 C 2368

Amy J. St. Eve,

Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion of this court issued on March 23, 2005, is amended as follows:

On page 1, the reference in the caption to Stateville Correction Center

should be modified to reflect Stateville Correctional Center.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of AMERCO (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Jason A. Berg, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:







(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and







(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





AMERCO,


a Nevada corporation





/s/ Jason A. Berg





Jason A. Berg


Principal Financial Officer and


Chief Accounting Officer


Date:  November 4, 2009
128740807v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TODD BOBO, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CLOVER NETWORK, LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 1:22-cv-22338-BB 

CONSENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 

Defendant Clover Network, LLC hereby moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 6(b) to extend its time to file a response to the Complaint (Dkt. No. 3) from August 

18, 2022 to September 16, 2022. 

This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. Counsel for Clover 

Network, LLC, who was recently retained, continues to review the allegations of the Complaint 

and requires additional time to respond to the same. Counsel for Clover Network, LLC does not 

yet have sufficient background information to reasonably formulate a response to the Complaint. 

Thus, good cause exists to extend the time by which Clover Network, LLC is required to 

respond. Additionally, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), Counsel for Clover Network, LLC 

communicated with counsel for Plaintiff, who consent to the requested extension. Thus, if this 

Court grants this request, this extension will not prejudice Plaintiff or delay progression of the 

case. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant Clover Network, LLC respectfully requests that the Court 

enter an Order granting this Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and 

providing Clover Network, LLC until September 16, 2022 to respond to the Complaint. 

Case 1:22-cv-22338-BB Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2022 Page 1 of 2
2 

128740807v1

Dated: August 11, 2022 

Respectfully submitted, 

Andrew D. Atkins (FL Bar No. 92689) 

TROUTMAN PEPPER LLP 

301 S. College St., 34th Floor 

Charlotte, NC 28202 

704.916.1504 (direct) 

andrew.atkins@troutman.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Clover Network LLC 

Case 1:22-cv-22338-BB Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2022 Page 2 of 2