alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAND E E P S I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74979 A ge nc yN o. A 073- 416- 909 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M ande e p S i ngh, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. R e vi e w i ng f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on, 

# FI LED JU N 11 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74979 2 I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 894 ( 9th C i r . 2003) , w e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v ie w . T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng S i ng h’ s m ot i on t o reopen because i tw as fi l ed m ore than tw o years af t erthe B IA ’ s D ec em ber 3, 20 04 , order d is m is s in g th e u n d e r ly in g ap p e a l, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2) ( m ot i on t o reopen ge ne r a l l ym us tbe f

i l e d w i thi n 90 day s of

the f i na l a dm i ni s tr a t i ve or de r ) , and S i ngh f a ile dto e s tab lis h g r o u n d s f o re q u itab le to llin g , s e e I tu rr ib a rr ia , 321 F . 3d a t897- 9 8 . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
#### CORNELIA VAN ALLEN, Plaintiff, *v.*THE FARMERS’ JOINT STOCK INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

*Insurance company—general agent—powers of—Patrol waiver of coriditions, when*i *policy in terms provides for written waive)'only.*

A general agent of an insurance company may waive the performance of a condition inserted in the policy for the benefit of the company. *(Ames*v. *N. Y. Union Ins. Co.,*4 Ker., 253; *Liddle*v. *Market Ins. Co.,*29 N. Y., 184; *Benedict*v. *Ocean Ins. Co.,*31 N. Y., 389; *Boehen*v. *Williamsburgh Ins. Co.,*35 id., 131; *Bodine*v. *Exchange Ins. Co.,*51 id., 117.)

A parol waiver of a condition in a policy is good, notwithstanding a provision in the policy that nothing but a written agreement, signed by an officer of the company, shall have that effect. *(Parker*v. *Arctic Ins. Co.,*1 N. Y. S. C., 397; affirmed by Court of Appeals.)

Motion to set aside verdict for plaintiff and for a new trial, upon exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance at the General Term. The action was upon a policy of insurance against fire.

*M. Hopkins,*for the plaintiff.

*D. Pratt,*for the defendant.

Opinion by

Gilbert, J.

Judgment affirmed.
Unfold Perception LLC

ADP Payroll

Non-ADP 

Payroll

Total 

Payroll

Average 

Monthly 

Payroll ADP Payroll

Non-ADP 

Payroll

Total 

Payroll

Average 

Monthly 

Payroll

ADP 

Payroll

Non-ADP 

Payroll

Total 

Payroll

Average 

Monthly 

Payroll

Regine Rene $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350 $350 $63 $24,574 $350 $24,924 $2,077 1, 2, 5

Paulette Cima $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,853 $0 $3,853 $321 1, 2, 5

Robenson Lauvince $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,895 $9,822 $22,717 $1,893 1, 2, 5

Payroll Taxes $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,226 $0 $13,226 $1,102 1, 5

Payroll Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $715 $0 $715 $60 1, 5

Cash Withdrawal $0 $300 $300 $25 $0 $9 $9 $2 $0 $3,009 $3,009 $251 5

Total $0 $300 $300 $25 $0 $359 $359 $64 $55,263 $13,181 $68,444 $5,704

Period / Year

PPP 

Application

Bank 

Records Difference

Percent 

Difference

PPP 

Application

State / 

ADP / 

Bank 

Records

2019 $32,781.66 $25 $32,757 3275666% 3 1

1/1/2020 - 6/18/2020 $32,781.66 $64 $32,718 51036% 3 1

2020 $32,781.66 $5,704 $27,078 475% 3 1

Note Source

1 ADP

2 Florida Department of Revenue

3 Paid Checks

4 No Records

5 Bank Records

Potential Payroll

Note

Reported vs Potential Average Monthly Payroll

2019 1/1/2020 - 6/18/2020 2020

Reported vs Potential 

No of Employees

Potential Employee

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-28 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### ALEXANDER M. C. SMITH *v.*THE MANHATTAN INSURANCE COMPANY.

*Insolvent corporation—distribution of assets of—when creditor may be allowed to present claim.*

Where, at the time of the appointment of a receiver of an insolvent corporation, a suit is pending against it, the plaintiff therein may, at any time before the entry of a final decree excluding all creditors who have not presented their claims, be permitted to come in, prove his claim, and participate equitably in the distribution of the fund still in the hands of the receiver.

*Matter of Harmony Ins. Co.*(9 Abb. [N. S.], 347) followed.

But where in such case the receiver had no actual notice of the petitioner’s claim before making the second dividend, and has reserved no fund applicable specifically to the payment thereof, it is error to require him to pay to the petitioner his proportion of such dividend.

Appeal from an order made at the Special Term, allowing the Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad Company to make proof of its claim against the defendant.

*Thomas H. Hubbard,*for the appellant.

*C. W. Bangs,*for the respondent.

Opinion by.

Gilbert, J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Order modified, and as modified affirmed, with costs.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of K.J.G

., a child, * From the 29th District

Court of Palo Pinto County,

Trial Court No. C45962

.

No. 11

- 15

- 00132

- CV * December 3 , 2015

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t here is

no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 149-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 06/13/2023   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis W. Blazer, V.P.  Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dennis W. Blazer                                         
|Dennis W. Blazer                                             
|V.P.  Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
|May 11, 2006                                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CECO Environmental
Corp. and will be retained by CECO Environmental Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



22
#### § 447.43 Investigation and enforcement.

The Office of the Special Counsel and the Merit Systems Protection Board investigate and adjudicate allegations of political activity in violation of the regulations of the Office of Personnel Management by Postal Service employees. For jurisdiction in such a case, see 5 CFR 734.102 and part 1201.

[60 FR 47245, Sept. 11, 1995]
Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 1 of 11
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 2 of 11
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 3 of 11
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 4 of 11
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 5 of 11
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 6 of 11
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 7 of 11
Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 8 of 11
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 9 of 11
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 10 of 11
Case 0:22-cr-60202-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2022 Page 11 of 11
§ 51.8 Relevant considerations. In determining the equity and propriety of a former member's discharge, the DRB shall consider all relevant evidence presented by the applicant. The DRB review will include, but is not limited to, consideration of the following factors: ( a ) The quality of the applicant's service. In determining the quality of the applicant's service, the DRB may consider the applicant's dates and periods of service; rate or rank achieved; marks and evaluations received; awards, decorations and letters of commendation; acts of merit; combat service and wounds received; promotions and demotions; prior military service and type of discharge; records of unauthorized absence; records of non-judicial punishment; convictions by court-martial; records of conviction by civil authorities while a member of the Coast Guard; and any other relevant information respecting the applicant which is brought to the board's attention.
( b ) The applicant's capability to serve. In determining the applicant's capability to serve, the DRB considers such factors as the applicant's age and education; qualification for reenlistment; capability to adjust to military service; and family or personal problems.
( c ) Any evidence of arbitrary, capricious or discriminatory actions by individuals in authority over the applicant.
( d ) Any other information respecting the applicant considered by the DRB to be relevant and material to the review of the applicant's discharge.
EXHIBIT
      32.2


STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Christopher Ryan, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Christopher
      Ryan


Christopher
      Ryan


Chief
      Financial Officer




Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent Independent Auditors 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-40462 and 333-73514) pertaining to the Digitas Inc. 2000Stock Option and Incentive Plan as amended and restated, the Digitas Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Bronner Slosberg Humphrey Co. 1999 Option Plan and the Bronner Slosberg Humphrey Co. 1998 Option Plan of our report dated January 23,2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Digitas Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 9, 2004
#### § 25.201 Scope.

This subpart prescribes the requirements for the administrative settlement of maritime tort claims against the United States for death, personal injury, damage to or loss of property caused by a vessel or other property in the service of the Coast Guard, or a maritime tort committed by an agent of the Coast Guard, and for claims for towage and salvage services rendered to a Coast Guard vessel or property.
EXHIBIT K



Section 906 Certification

Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, the undersigned officers of Santander BanCorp (the "Registrant") hereby certifies, to such officer ́s knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.













|Dated: | March 20, 2003 | By: | /s/José Ramón González       
|------ | -------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|       |                |     | President and Chief Executive
|       |                |     | Officer                      
|       |                |     |                              
|       |                |     |                              
|       |                |     |                              
|Date:  | March 20, 2003 | By: | /s/ Maria Calero             
|       |                |     | Executive Vice President and 
|       |                |     | Chief Accounting Officer     









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Santander BanCorp and will be retained by Santander BanCorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3152

KYAW SOE,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board

in SF3443090014-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The United States Postal Service moves to reform the official caption to

designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent. The USPS also

moves to stay the briefing schedule, pending disposition of the motion to reform the

caption.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when

the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing

agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the

underlying case. In this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1)	The motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is

reflected above.
(2)	The motion to stay the briefing schedule is granted to the extent that the

Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

MAY 2 6 2009	/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Kyaw Soe

Jeffrey D. Klingman, Esq.

Stephanie M. Conley, Esq.

s8

u.stgrditliamPeN

MAY 2 6 2009

JAN HUNtind

CLERK

2009-3152	 - 2 -
#### § 959.28 Computation of time.

A designated period of time excludes the day the period begins, and includes the last day of the period unless the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the close of business on the next business day.
§ 3010.200 Applicability. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Commission shall conduct proceedings in conformance with the notice and comment procedures of this subpart whenever: ( 1 ) The Commission is considering the issuance, amendment, or repeal of any Commission rule or regulation;
( 2 ) The Commission is seeking information to inform potential future Commission action with or without the issuance of a final decision; or
( 3 ) The Commission in the exercise of its discretion determines it is appropriate.
( b ) Unless the Commission orders otherwise, this subpart shall not apply to proceedings governed by subpart F of this part (Proceedings with an Opportunity for a Hearing on the Record). This subpart also shall not apply to the following parts of subchapter D of chapter III (Special Rules of Practice for Specific Proceeding Types) of this title: part 3020 (Rules Applicable to Requests for Changes in the Nature of Postal Services), part 3021 (Rules for Appeals of Postal Service Determinations to Close or Consolidate Post Offices), part 3022 (Rules for Complaints) of this chapter, part 3023 (Rules for Rate or Service Inquiries), and part 3024 (Special Rules for Complaints Alleging Violations of 39 U.S.C. 404a). This subpart shall not apply to any proceeding governed by §§ 3041.325, 3041.505(f), and 3041.505(g) (Competitive Negotiated Service Agreements) of this chapter.
[85 FR 9620, Feb. 19, 2020, as amended at 89 FR 67294, Aug. 20, 2024]
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02827

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 02827\02827_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02827\02827_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

02827\02827_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 02827\02827_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02827\02827_PartA.XLS Plant submitted survey file

x 02827\02827_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

02827\Certification Statement Plant ID 02827.pdf Plant certification statement

x 02827\Supporting Documentation\02827_Part A_02827_WB-sheets.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02827\Supporting Documentation\Part A_02827_WM-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database .
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are available for licensing by the Department of Navy. 

U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/551,364 entitled, “Collaborative Development Network for Widely Dispersed Users and Methods Therefor,” filing date: April 17, 2000, Navy Case No. 79260. 

# ADDRESS:

Requests for copies of the patent application cited should be directed to the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, Code CD222, 17320 Dahlgren Road, Building 183, Room 015, Dahlgren, VA 22448-5100, and must include the Navy Case number. Interested parties will be required to sign a Confidentiality, Non-Disclosure and Non-Use Agreement before receiving copies of requested patent applications. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James B. Bechtel, Patent Counsel, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Laboratory, Code CD222, 17320 Dahlgren Road, Building 183, Room 015, Dahlgre, VA 22448-5100, telephone (540) 653-8016. 

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR Part 404) 

Dated: May 31, 2000. 

J.L. Roth, 

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 00-14640 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-U
#### § 328.1 Purpose.

This section defines the term “waters of the United States” as it applies to the jurisdictional limits of the authority of the Corps of Engineers under the Clean Water Act. It prescribes the policy, practice, and procedures to be used in determining the extent of jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers concerning “waters of the United States.” The terminology used by section 404 of the Clean Water Act includes “navigable waters” which is defined at section 502(7) of the Act as “waters of the United States including the territorial seas.” To provide clarity and to avoid confusion with other Corps of Engineer regulatory programs, the term “waters of the United States” is used throughout 33 CFR parts 320 through 330. This section does not apply to authorities under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 except that some of the same waters may be regulated under both statutes (see 33 CFR parts 322 and 329).