alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 209.230 Use of reservoir areas for recreation.

The Department of the Army in accordance with Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, as amended by section 4 of the Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 641) prepares and administers plans to obtain the maximum sustained public benefit from the use of reservoir areas under its control for recreation and other related purposes, when such use is consistent with the operation and maintenance of the reservoir project for the specific purposes of the reservoir project as authorized by law and when such use is determined not to be contrary to the public interest. The plans are prepared and administered by the District Engineers, subject to review and approval of the Division Engineers and the Chief of Engineers, in close cooperation with other Federal agencies and local interests. The views and desires of these agencies and local interests are obtained normally by conferences with the District Engineers. In many cases, public hearings are held by the District Engineers at appropriate times in the vicinity of the reservoir area at which time anyone can express his views relative to these plans for consideration of the Department of the Army. Rules and regulations are prescribed by the Secretary of the Army to govern the public use of the reservoir areas in accordance with the law as a part of the master plan for recreational and related uses of the reservoir area. These rules and regulations are published in 36 CFR parts 311 to 326. Licenses and leases are granted under the law containing conditions and provisions to govern the use of specific portions of the reservoir area. Full information concerning such matters may be obtained from the District Engineer in charge of the reservoir.
§ 331.1 Purpose and policy. ( a ) *General.* The purpose of this part is to establish policies and procedures to be used for the administrative appeal of approved jurisdictional determinations (JDs), permit applications denied with prejudice, and declined permits. The appeal process will allow the affected party to pursue an administrative appeal of certain Corps of Engineers decisions with which they disagree. The basis for an appeal and the specific policies and procedures of the appeal process are described in the following sections. It shall be the policy of the Corps of Engineers to promote and maintain an administrative appeal process that is independent, objective, fair, prompt, and efficient.
( b ) *Level of decision maker.* Appealable actions decided by a division engineer or higher authority may be appealed to an Army official at least one level higher than the decision maker. This higher Army official shall make the decision on the merits of the appeal, and may appoint a qualified individual to act as a review officer (as defined in § 331.2). References to the division engineer in this part shall be understood as also referring to a higher level Army official when such official is conducting an administrative appeal.
#### JOHN McDONNELL and another, Respondents, *v.*WALTER BAUENDAHL and others, Appellants.

*Assignment by bankrupt—effect of.*

One Lee, after he had been declared a bankrupt, assigned to the plaintiffs the claim against the defendants upon which this action was brought; no assignee in bankruptcy was ever appointed, and the proceedings were subsequently discontinued. *Held,*that the assignment was valid.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon the report of a referee.

*I. S. & C. H. Smith,*for the appellants.

*F. Fish,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
The Aging Network: Program Instructions

September 30, 1998 

AOA-PI-98-06 

TO: STATE AGENCIES ON AGING ADMINISTERING PLANS UNDER TITLE III OF THE OLDER 

AMERICANS ACT, AS AMENDED

SUBJECT: Grants to State Agencies on Aging to Enhance the Capacity of Information and 

Referral Services to Address Medicare+Choice

The closing date for submission of applications has been extended to: November 9, 1998.

LEGAL AND RELATED REFERENCES: Older Americans Act, as Amended (Public Law 102-375)

The Administration on Aging (AoA) invites State Agencies on Aging to apply for two(2) 

funding opportunities to enhance the capacity of the aging network's information and 

referral systems to provide accurate information and make appropriate referrals for 

Medicare+Choice inquiries. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established the Medicare+Choice 

Program, which authorizes new Medicare health plan options for beneficiaries to choose. The Health 

Care Financing Administration (HCFA) has provided AoA with funds for two important initiatives 

related to the National Medicare Education Program. 

The Information and Referral for Medicare Beneficiaries Projects are intended to strengthen 

the capability of the aging network's information and referral programs to respond to inquiries 

regarding Medicare+Choice (M+C) State Agencies will be able to use funds to aid in training efforts 

and pursue other activities in support of M+C implementation. Each State may apply for an award 

based on a funding formula derived from Medicare beneficiary and managed care concentration data 

provided by HCFA. A description of the formula and a chart showing funding allocations for each state 

are included in the guidelines attached.

In the second funding opportunity, Model State Projects to Develop Medicare Information and 

Referral Protocols and Reports, AoA is seeking proposals from State Agencies on Aging to collect 

data on the number and type of M+C inquiries made to I&R providers and to develop revised protocols 

for handling such inquiries in subsequent years. State Agencies awarded grants under this program 

competition shall each receive up to $75,000 for a one (1) year project grant. AoA expects to fund up 

to five projects.

I strongly encourage all state agencies on aging to apply for this funding.

DUE DATE: Due by October 30, 1998

ATTACHMENTS: Guidelines for Preparing and Submitting Grant Applications
 The Information and Referral for Medicare Beneficiaries Projects: Part I | 

Part II

 Model State Projects to Develop Medicare Information and Referral 

Protocols and Reports

INQUIRIES: Inquiries should be addressed to Regional Administrators on Aging, DHHS Regional 

Offices 

Jeanette C. Takamura

Assistant Secretary for Aging

INQUIRIES: Inquiries should be addressed to Regional Administrators on Aging, HHS regional offices.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4988 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4988

  To expand the boundary of the George Washington Birthplace National 
                   Monument, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Bateman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To expand the boundary of the George Washington Birthplace National 
                   Monument, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEORGE WASHINGTON BIRTHPLACE NATIONAL MONUMENT BOUNDARIES 
              ADJUSTED.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``George Washington 
Birthplace National Monument Boundary Adjustment Act of 2000''.
    (b) Boundary of George Washington Birthplace National Monument.--
The boundary of the George Washington Birthplace National Monument 
(hereinafter referred to as the ``monument'') is modified to include 
the area comprising approximately 115 acres, as generally depicted on 
the map entitled ``George Washington Birthplace National Monument 
Boundary Map Westmoreland County Virginia'', numbered 332/80,011B, and 
dated July 2000. The map shall be on file and available for inspection 
in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service, Department of 
the Interior.
    (c) Acquisition of Lands.--The Secretary of the Interior may 
acquire land or interests in land described in subsection (b) by 
donation, purchase from willing sellers with donated or appropriated 
funds, or exchange.
    (d) Administration of Lands.--Lands added to the monument pursuant 
to subsection (b) shall be administered by the Secretary of the 
Interior as part of the monument in accordance with the laws and 
regulations applicable hereto.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-41430 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FELIPE ALBERTO GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-99-CR-284-1

--------------------

August 22, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Felipe Alberto Gonzalez appeals his sentence from his

guilty-plea conviction for possession with the intent to

distribute heroin. We decline the appellee’s suggestion to

dismiss the appeal without consideration of the arguments

submitted by Gonzalez’s retained counsel.

Gonzalez challenges the prior conviction used to enhance his

sentence pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851. He contends that his prior

conviction is unconstitutional because the applicable Texas

statute at the time of that conviction, 1968, treated differently
No. 99-41430

-2-

males and females of the same age for purposes of trying

seventeen-year old individuals as adults. Gonzalez’s argument is

foreclosed by the limitation period of § 851(e). See United

States v. Gonzales, 79 F.3d 413, 426-27 (5th Cir. 1996).

Gonzalez also challenges the district court’s decision not

to award Gonzalez the additional one-level reduction to his

offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b). We detect no

clear error by the district court. See United States v.

Williams, 74 F.3d 654, 656-57 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.
From: Ellen Turcio/AWA/FAA

AFS-820, Operations & FAAST Support Branch

To: Keira Jones/AWA/FAA@FAA, 

Date: 12/03/2012 08:42 AM

Subject: Fw: Petition for Exemption FAA-2012-1189

Good Morning Ms. Jones,

Below is my email correspondence with the petitioner I am forwarding to you for record. If you need 

anything else please let me know.

Thank you.

Ellen Turcio

Aviation Safety Inspector

Commercial Operations Branch, AFS-820

Flight Standards Service

Federal Aviation Administration

----- Forwarded by Ellen Turcio/AWA/FAA on 12/03/2012 08:37 AM -----

From: Ellen Turcio/AWA/FAA

AFS-820, Operations & FAAST Support Branch

To: Lee, Doug A (TS) 

Date: 11/29/2012 10:47 AM

Subject: RE: Petition for Exemption FAA-2012-1189

Dear Mr. Lee,

You will need to go to your docket file on http://www.regulations.gov. You may submit documentation via 

comment to explain your need for including the additional section(s) in your exemption, similar to your 

initial request. Enter your Docket ID, FAA-2012-1189, into the search box on the home page. Once in 

your docket file, click on the blue Comment Now button. Your addendum to the petition for exemption 

may be uploaded to your docket file in Item 3. Upload File.

Due to processing, please note your new document may not be available to view immediately. Please 

feel free to contact me if you have any further questions.

Cordially,

Ellen Turcio

Aviation Safety Inspector

Commercial Operations Branch, AFS-820

Flight Standards Service

Federal Aviation Administration

From: Lee, Doug A (TS)

AFS-820, Operations & FAAST Support Branch

To: Ellen Turcio/AWA/FAA@FAA, 

Date: 11/29/2012 09:48 AM

Subject: RE: Petition for Exemption FAA-2012-1189
Yes, I need the exemption as you stated. How do I go about updating my request?

Thanks

V/r

Doug Lee

From: Ellen Turcio 

Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:22 AM

To: Lee, Doug A (TS)

Subject: Petition for Exemption FAA-2012-1189

Dear Mr. Lee,

My name is Ellen Turcio and I am with the Federal Aviation Administration in Washington D.C. I am 

currently reviewing your petition for exemption from 14 CFR 91.203 (b), Regulatory Docket No. FAA2012-1189. It is noted that you are not seeking an exemption to 14 CFR 91.9(b)(2). Previous and current 

91.203(a) and (b) exemption precedent regarding unmanned systems has also included request for 

exemption from 91.9(b)(2) to operate the unmanned system without the flight manual on board. In order 

to complete my review, please update your petition by uploading an addendum to the docket if you are 

similarly requesting an exemption from 91.9(b)(2) as well as 91.203 (a) and (b).

Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions.

Thank you,

Ellen Turcio

Aviation Safety Inspector

Commercial Operations Branch, AFS-820

Flight Standards Service

Federal Aviation Administration
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Charter","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RGRQFZWDPA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/charter\/\">Charter<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/charter\/embed\/#?secret=RGRQFZWDPA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Charter” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"RGRQFZWDPA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley D. Tilden,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By    /s/ Bradley D. Tilden
   ------------------------------------
Bradley D. Tilden
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.277 How may Federal agencies and States participate in the application process? ( a ) Under § 148.209 of this part, Federal agencies and Adjacent Coastal States are sent copies of the application. The agencies and States are encouraged to begin submitting their comments at that time.
( b ) To be considered, comments from Federal agencies and Adjacent Coastal States must be received by the Commandant (CG-5P) within 45 days after the close of the public hearing period specified in § 148.276(b) of this part. Separate comment periods will apply to the review of documents created during the National Environmental Policy Act process. Both the Commandant (CG-5P) and MARAD review the comments received.
( c ) Comments should identify problems, if any, and suggest possible solutions.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39177, July 1, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 516 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 516

   To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal banking 
  agencies from implementing ``know your customer'' regulations which 
  overburden financial institutions and invade the privacy of United 
                            States citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1999

Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Rogan, Mr. Upton, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. 
  Nethercutt, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. Latham, Mr. Young of 
  Alaska, Mr. Skeen, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Campbell, and Mr. Hall of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal banking 
  agencies from implementing ``know your customer'' regulations which 
  overburden financial institutions and invade the privacy of United 
                            States citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ```Know Your Customer' Sunset Act''.

SEC. 2. IMMEDIATE TERMINATION OF ``KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER'' REGULATIONS.

    Any regulation prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury or any 
Federal banking agency (as defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Act) under subchapter II or III of chapter 53 of title 31, 
United States Code, chapter 2 of Public Law 91-508, section 21 of the 
Federal Deposit Insurance Act, or any other provision of Federal law, 
that has the effect of requiring a depository institution (as defined 
in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) or any other private 
entity--
            (1) to monitor the account of any customer of the 
        institution or entity; or
            (2) to obtain information concerning any person in 
        connection with a financial transaction at the institution or 
        entity, including the source of any funds involved in the 
        transaction,
(commonly referred to as ``know your customer'' regulations) shall 
cease to be effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act and 
no such regulation may be prescribed after such date.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                266
<SECURITIES>                            0    
<RECEIVABLES>                        2392
<ALLOWANCES>                          110
<INVENTORY>                          2157
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     4912
<PP&E>                              12017
<DEPRECIATION>                       8734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       8211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                3565
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                             2010                
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                           2333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         8211
<SALES>                             10186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    10203
<CGS>                                8485
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       11641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      767 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    104 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                           73
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (2382)  
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (2382)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (1.09)

        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130484 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

BONNIE AMON, Successor Personal Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Ann Marie Justices Samodell, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 130484 

 COA: 260252 

Oakland CC: 2002-046057-NH 

BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL, 

and ROBERT F. SCHIRMER, D.O., 

 Defendants-Appellants/ 

Cross-Appellees. ___________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879) is pending on appeal 

before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the 

present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in 

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. 

l0410 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 13, 2007 

Clerk
Opinion issued September 24 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 15
- 00739
- CR NO. 01
- 15
- 00740
- CR

——————————— IN RE WILLIAM HAYWAR D FREEMAN, SR. , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, William Hayward Freeman, Sr., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the court reporter to provide him with a full transcript of trial court proceedings. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. 1

1 The underlying case is Freeman v. State , No. 1322259, in the 182nd District Court of Harris County, Texas , the Honorable James Anderson pre siding

.2 PER CURIA M
P anel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).