The EPA Regional Administrator, Jared Blumenfeld signed the following fi na l

rule on December 18 , 2012 and EPA is submitting it for publication in the Federal Register (FR). While we have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this Internet version of the fi na l rule, it is not the official version of the fi na l ru le . Please refer to the official version in a forthcoming FR publication appearing on the Government Printing Office’s FDsys website, http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action and on Regulation.gov in Docket Number EPA

- R09

- OAR
- 201 2

- 0 781 , http://www.regulations.gov Billing Code: 6560

- 50

- P ENVIRONMENT AL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52 [ EPA - R09 - OAR - 201 2 - 078 1 ; FRL – ] Determination of Attainment for the Yuba City - Marysville Nonattainment Area for the 2006 Fine Particle Standard ; California; Determination Regarding Applicability of Clean Air Act Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to d etermin e that the Yuba City

- Marysville nonattainment area in California ha s attained
t he 2006 24

- hour fine partic le (PM 2.5 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standard ( NAAQS ) . Th is determination is based upon complete, quality

- assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data showin g that th is area ha s monitored attainment of the 2006 24

- hour PM 2.5 NAAQS based on the 2009

– 2011 monitoring period. Based on the above determination, the requirements for th is area to submit an attainment demonstration, together with reasonably available control measures (RACM) , a reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, and contingency measures for failure to meet RFP and attainment deadlines are suspended for so long as the ar ea continue s to attain the 2 006 24

- hour PM 2.5 NAAQS.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

2 EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective on [ Insert date 30 days from date of publication ]. ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA

- R09

- OAR
- 2012

- 0 78 1 for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all d ocuments in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov , some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi

- volume reports), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., C onfidential Business Information ). To inspect the h ard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Ungvarsky, (415) 972

- 3963, or by email at ungvarsky.john@epa.gov
. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever “we”, “us” or “our” are used, we mean EPA. Table of Contents
I. Summary of Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
I II . EPA’s Final ActionThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

3 I V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Summary of Proposed Action
On October 30 , 2012 (77 FR 65 646 ), EPA propos ed to determine that the Yuba City

- Marysville nonattainment area 1 has attained the 2006 24

- hour N AAQS 2 for fine particles (generally referring to particles less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers in diameter, PM 2.5 ). In our proposed rule, we explained how EPA makes an attainment determination for the 2006 24

- hour PM 2.5 NAAQS by reference to complete, quality

- assured data gathe red at a State and Local Air Monitoring Station ( s ) (SLAMS) and entered into EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS) database and by reference to 40 CFR 50.13 (“National primary and secondary ambient air quality standards for PM 2.5 ”) and appendix N to [40 CFR] part 50 (“Interpretation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM 2.5 ”). EPA proposed th e determination of attainment for the Yuba City

- Marysville a rea based upon a review of the monitoring network operated by the California Air Resources Board (CARB ) and the data collected at the one monitoring site operating during the most recent complete three

- year period (i.e., 2009 to

1 The Yuba City

- Marysville PM 2.5 nonattainment area includes Sutter County and the south western two
- thirds of Yuba County. This nonattainment area lies within the Sacramento Vall ey Air Basin and lies between the Chico PM 2.5 nonattainment area t o the north and the Sacramento PM 2.5 nonattainment area to the south . 2 T he 2006 24

- hour PM 2.5 NAAQS is 35 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m 3 ), based on a 3

- year average of the 98th percentile of 24

- hour concentrations
.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

4 2011). Based on this review, EPA found that complete, quality

assured and certified data for the Yuba City

- Marysville area showed that the 24

- hour design value for the 2009

- 2011 period was equal to or less than 35 μ/m 3 at the monitor s ite. See the data summary table on page 65 648 of the October 30 , 2012 proposed rule. We also noted that preliminary data available in AQS for 2012 indicates that the Yuba City

- Marysville area continues to attain the NAAQS.
In our proposed rule, based on the proposed determination of attainment, we also proposed to apply EPA’s Clean Data Policy to the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS and thereby suspend the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, associated reasonably available control measures (RACM), a reasonable further progress (RFP) plan, and contingency measures for so long as the area continues to attain the 2006 24

- hour PM 2. 5 NAAQS. See pages 65 648

- 65 6 5 0 of our October 30 , 2012 proposed rule. In proposing to apply the Clean Data Policy to the 2006
PM 2.5 NAAQS, we explained how we are applying the same statutory interpretation with respect to the implications of clean data determinations that the Agency has long applied in regulations for the 1997 8

- hour ozone and PM 2.5 NAAQS and in individual rulemakings for the 1

- hour ozone, PM 10 and lead NAAQS. Please see the October 30 , 2012 proposed rule for moreThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

5 detailed information co ncerning the PM 2.5 NAAQS, designations of
PM 2.5 nonattainment areas, the regulatory basis for determining attainment of the NAAQS, CARB ’s PM 2.5 monitoring network , EPA’s review and evaluation of the data, and the rationale and implications for application of the Clean Data Policy to the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS . II. Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed rule provided a 30

- day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments
. I II . EPA’s Final Action For the reasons provided in the proposed rule and summarized herein, EPA is taking final action to determine that the Yuba City

- Marysville nonattainment area in California ha s attained the 2006 24

- hour PM 2.5 NAAQS based on the most recent three years of complete, quality

- assured, and certified data in AQS for 2009

- 2011. Preliminary data available in AQS for 201 2 show that th i s area continue s to attain the standard.
EPA is also taking final action , based on the abo ve de termination of attainment, to suspend the requirements for the Yuba City

- Marysville nonattainment area to submit an attainment demonstration and associated RACM, a RFP plan, contingency measures, and any other planning SIPs related to attainment of the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS f or so long as the area continue s to attainThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

6 the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS. EPA's final action is consistent and in keeping with its long

- h e ld interpretation of CAA requirements, as well as with EPA's regulations for similar determinations for

o zone ( see 40 CFR 51.918) and the 1997 fine particulate matter standards ( see 40 CFR 51.1004(c)). Today’s final a ction does not constitute a redesignation of the Yuba City

- Marysville nonattainment area to attainment for the 2006 24

- hour PM 2.5 NAAQS under CAA section 107(d)(3) because we have not yet approved a m aintenance plan for the Yuba City

Marysville nonattainment area as meeting the requirements of section 175A of the CAA or determined that the area ha s met the other CAA requirements for redesi gnation. The classification and designation status in 40 CFR part 81 remain nonattainment for th i s area until such time as EPA determines that California has
met the CAA requirements for redesignat ing the Yuba City

Marysville nonattainment area to attainme nt. If the Yuba City

- Marysville nonattainment area continue s to monitor attainment of the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS, t he requirements for the area to submit an attainment demonstration and associated RACM, a RFP plan, contingency measures, and any other planning

re quirements related to attainment of the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS will remain suspended. If after today’s action EPA subsequently determines, after notice

- and

- comment rulemaking in the FederalThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

7 Register , that the area ha s violated the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS, the basis for the suspension of the attainment planning requirements for the area would no longer exist, and the area would thereafter have to address such requirements. I V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Th is final action make s a determin ation of attainment based on air quality and suspends certain federal requirements, and thus, this action would not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For th is reason, th e final action :

 Is not a “ significant regulatory action ” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

 Do es not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq .);

 Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq .);

 Do es not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as de scribed in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104

- 4);This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

8  Do es not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

 Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safet y risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

 Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

 Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transf er and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and

 Do es not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects wi th practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this final action does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) , because the SIP obligations discussed herein do not apply to Indian Tribes , and thus this action will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal g overnments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq ., asThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

9 added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congre ss and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publicat ion of the rule in the Federal Register
. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register . This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judici al review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [ Insert date 60 days from date of publication ]. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the fi nality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proc eedings to enforce its requirements. ( See section 307(b)(2).)This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

10 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by r eference, Particulate matter, Nitrogen oxides, Sulfur oxides, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

_ ____________

_____ _________ ____ _________ Dated: Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator, Region IX.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on December 1 8 , 2012. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version.

11 Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52 – [AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F – California 2. In Section 52. 2 47 , paragraph (b) is added to read as follows: §52. 2 47 Control Strategy and regulations: Fine P artic le Matter . ( b ) Determination of Attainment : Effective [ Insert date 30 days from date of publication ] , EPA has determined that, based on 2009 to 2011 ambient air quality data, the Yuba City

- Marysville
PM 2.5 nonattainment area ha s attained the 2006 24

- hour PM 2.5 NAAQS . T h is determination suspend s the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration , associated reasonably available control measures, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning SIPs related to atta inment for as long as th is area continue s to attain the 2006 24

- hour PM 2.5 NAAQS . If EPA determines, after notice

- and

- comment rulemaking, that th is area no longer meets the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS , the corresponding determination of attainment for that area shall be withdrawn.