### 0 12 24 36 48 60
0 12 24 36 48 60 -5 0 5 10 15 20
01/01/2010 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 12/31/2012

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.16x + 2.83 R = 0.94 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R

S F0 1 2 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F 0 1 2 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 1001 10.7 15.3 1.42 Winter 247 11.7 15.2 1.31 Spring 269 8.7 13.1 1.51 Summer241 10.0 15.8 1.58 Fall 244 12.7 17.1 1.35 2010 328 10.2 14.9 1.46 2011 348 11.0 16.1 1.46 2012 325 11.0 14.8 1.35 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 1001 46.8 995 47.1 Winter 247 35.7 246 35.3 Spring 269 51.8 264 53.3 Summer 241 59.4 241 59.4 Fall 244 40.0 244 40.0 2010 328 49.7 328 49.7 2011 348 51.7 344 52.8 2012 325 38.6 323 38.3 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-059-0007: Anaheim, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 12 24 36 48 60
0 12 24 36 48 60 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
01/01/2011 12/31/2011 12/30/2012 12/30/2013

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.16x + 2.62 R = 0.94 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R S F 1 23 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 988 10.7 15.0 1.40 Winter 247 11.4 14.8 1.30 Spring 254 8.6 12.6 1.46 Summer227 9.7 15.4 1.59 Fall 260 13.0 17.2 1.32 2011 348 11.0 16.1 1.46 2012 325 11.0 14.8 1.35 2013 315 10.2 14.1 1.38 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 988 44.3 977 44.3 Winter 247 34.3 242 32.8 Spring 254 46.2 249 47.6 Summer 227 62.2 227 62.2 Fall 260 36.4 259 36.3 2011 348 51.7 344 52.8 2012 325 38.6 323 38.3 2013 315 42.0 310 41.2 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-059-0007: Anaheim, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 14 28 42 56 70
0 12 24 36 48 60 -10 -3 4 11 18 25
01/01/2010 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 12/31/2012

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.14x + 3.81 R = 0.91 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W RS F 01 2 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

0 1 2 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 970 12.6 18.2 1.44 Winter 260 12.5 16.0 1.27 Spring 211 11.3 17.1 1.51 Summer255 12.1 19.6 1.62 Fall 244 14.4 20.3 1.41 2010 319 12.5 17.5 1.40 2011 302 13.4 19.6 1.47 2012 349 12.1 17.8 1.47 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 970 50.0 967 49.8 Winter 260 33.3 258 32.7 Spring 211 55.1 211 55.1 Summer 255 63.6 255 63.6 Fall 244 49.3 243 49.1 2010 319 46.4 316 45.8 2011 302 52.1 302 52.1 2012 349 51.6 349 51.6 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-1002: Burbank, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 14 28 42 56 70
0 12 24 36 48 60 -15 -7 1 9 17 25
01/01/2011 01/01/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2013

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.10x + 4.47 R = 0.89 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W RS

F 1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 988 12.5 18.3 1.46 Winter 259 13.4 16.7 1.25 Spring 217 11.0 17.6 1.60 Summer262 11.6 19.3 1.66 Fall 250 13.8 19.4 1.40 2011 302 13.4 19.6 1.47 2012 349 12.1 17.8 1.47 2013 337 12.1 17.6 1.45 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 988 79.5 981 50.9 Winter 259 138 252 28.4 Spring 217 63.2 217 63.2 Summer 262 68.0 262 68.0 Fall 250 45.1 250 45.1 2011 302 52.1 302 52.1 2012 349 51.6 349 51.6 2013 337 133 330 49.2 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-1002: Burbank, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 12 24 36 48 60
0 8 16 24 32 40 -15 -7 1 9 17 25
01/01/2010 08/01/2010 03/01/2011 09/30/2011

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.27x + 1.35 R = 0.90 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall

A W R S F 0 1 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall AW R S F

0 1 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 399 12.3 17.0 1.38 Winter 138 11.9 14.9 1.25 Spring 75 11.3 15.9 1.40 Summer 95 12.7 19.6 1.55 Fall 91 13.2 18.2 1.38 2010 298 12.1 17.2 1.42 2011 101 12.8 16.3 1.27 2012 0 . . . 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 399 39.7 394 39.5 Winter 138 29.1 136 29.3 Spring 75 37.9 75 37.9 Summer 95 53.1 94 53.1 Fall 91 43.1 89 42.0 2010 298 44.5 294 44.4 2011 101 25.6 100 25.1 2012 0 . . . 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-1103: Los Angeles, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 16 32 48 64 80
0 12 24 36 48 60 -25 -14 -3 8 19 30
10/01/2011 03/01/2012 07/31/2012 12/31/2012

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.11x + 5.33 R = 0.81 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R S

F 1 2 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall AWF 1 2 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 384 13.4 20.3 1.51 Winter 92 13.1 18.6 1.42 Spring 76 13.1 18.6 1.42 Summer 74 12.0 22.2 1.84 Fall 142 14.6 21.3 1.46 2010 0 . . . 2011 73 16.2 22.1 1.36 2012 311 12.8 19.9 1.55 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 384 59.7 374 62.5 Winter 92 48.5 90 45.6 Spring 76 51.2 68 68.9 Summer 74 87.2 74 87.2 Fall 142 57.1 142 57.1 2010 0 . . . 2011 73 44.3 73 44.3 2012 311 63.3 301 66.9 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-1103: Los Angeles, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=9



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 14 28 42 56 70
0 14 28 42 56 70 -15 -7 1 9 17 25
01/01/2009 12/01/2009 10/31/2010 09/30/2011

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.21x + 1.77 R = 0.93 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R S F 90 1 

### A=AllData,9=2009, 0=2010, 1=2011 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

9 0 1 

### A=AllData, 9=2009, 0=2010, 1=2011 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 739 13.2 17.8 1.34 Winter 226 13.1 15.8 1.21 Spring 161 12.1 16.6 1.37 Summer170 14.0 20.6 1.48 Fall 182 13.8 18.6 1.35 2009 340 14.4 18.7 1.30 2010 298 12.1 17.2 1.42 2011 101 12.8 16.3 1.27 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 739 36.1 734 36.0 Winter 226 24.8 224 24.8 Spring 161 35.9 161 35.9 Summer 170 48.0 169 48.0 Fall 182 39.5 180 38.9 2009 340 32.0 340 32.0 2010 298 44.5 294 44.4 2011 101 25.6 100 25.1 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-1103: Los Angeles, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 16 32 48 64 80
0 12 24 36 48 60 -25 -14 -3 8 19 30
10/01/2011 07/01/2012 04/01/2013 12/31/2013

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.15x + 4.86 R = 0.83 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R S F 1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W F 1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 720 12.8 19.6 1.53 Winter 176 12.9 18.2 1.42 Spring 160 12.5 19.8 1.59 Summer156 11.8 21.4 1.81 Fall 228 13.7 19.5 1.42 2011 73 16.2 22.1 1.36 2012 311 12.8 19.9 1.55 2013 336 12.1 18.9 1.56 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 720 62.3 706 61.3 Winter 176 49.4 171 46.8 Spring 160 66.1 152 74.8 Summer 156 93.5 155 83.1 Fall 228 48.3 228 48.3 2011 73 44.3 73 44.3 2012 311 63.3 301 66.9 2013 336 65.3 332 60.0 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-1103: Los Angeles, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=9



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 16 32 48 64 80
0 12 24 36 48 60 -15 -7 1 9 17 25
01/01/2010 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 12/31/2012

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.07x + 5.01 R = 0.91 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R F 0 1 2 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

0 1 2 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 1014 15.3 21.2 1.39 Winter 246 14.8 18.1 1.22 Spring 248 14.1 19.3 1.36 Summer252 15.1 25.0 1.65 Fall 268 16.9 22.5 1.33 2010 340 15.2 21.0 1.38 2011 334 15.5 22.4 1.44 2012 340 15.0 20.4 1.36 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 1014 47.8 999 46.3 Winter 246 35.0 235 30.4 Spring 248 41.7 247 41.5 Summer 252 70.2 252 70.2 Fall 268 44.1 265 42.2 2010 340 46.9 335 45.1 2011 334 52.8 328 51.0 2012 340 43.7 336 42.9 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-065-8005: Mira Loma, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 18 36 54 72 90
0 12 24 36 48 60 -15 -4 7 18 29 40
01/01/2011 01/01/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2013

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.10x + 4.12 R = 0.90 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R S F 1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 1021 14.9 20.4 1.37 Winter 255 14.4 17.3 1.20 Spring 244 14.3 19.4 1.36 Summer257 13.7 23.1 1.69 Fall 265 17.0 21.8 1.28 2011 334 15.5 22.4 1.44 2012 340 15.0 20.4 1.36 2013 347 14.1 18.5 1.32 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 1021 44.1 999 43.3 Winter 255 32.0 238 26.9 Spring 244 39.9 244 39.9 Summer 257 71.2 257 71.2 Fall 265 33.2 260 33.8 2011 334 52.8 328 51.0 2012 340 43.7 336 42.9 2013 347 36.1 335 36.1 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-065-8005: Mira Loma, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 12 24 36 48 60
0 10 20 30 40 50 -5 0 5 10 15 20
01/01/2010 01/01/2011 01/01/2012 12/31/2012

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.16x + 1.67 R = 0.93 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R S F 0 1 2 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

0 12 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 969 10.7 14.1 1.32 Winter 221 12.6 15.1 1.20 Spring 231 8.5 11.0 1.30 Summer268 9.7 13.5 1.40 Fall 249 12.2 16.7 1.38 2010 323 10.5 12.1 1.15 2011 335 10.8 15.4 1.42 2012 311 10.8 14.8 1.38 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 969 34.0 952 34.4 Winter 221 21.4 213 22.9 Spring 231 31.1 226 30.6 Summer 268 39.5 268 39.5 Fall 249 42.1 245 42.3 2010 323 14.9 314 15.3 2011 335 46.4 329 46.5 2012 311 40.7 309 41.0 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-4002: Long Beach, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 12 24 36 48 60
0 10 20 30 40 50 -5 0 5 10 15 20
01/01/2011 12/01/2011 10/30/2012 09/30/2013

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.16x + 2.23 R = 0.94 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R S F 1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

12 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 872 10.7 14.7 1.37 Winter 214 12.7 16.1 1.26 Spring 228 8.6 11.8 1.38 Summer255 9.7 14.0 1.45 Fall 175 12.6 17.9 1.42 2011 335 10.8 15.4 1.42 2012 311 10.8 14.8 1.38 2013 226 10.5 13.5 1.29 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 872 40.6 861 39.9 Winter 214 32.1 208 29.3 Spring 228 39.1 223 38.8 Summer 255 44.4 255 44.4 Fall 175 47.5 175 47.5 2011 335 46.4 329 46.5 2012 311 40.7 309 41.0 2013 226 32.0 223 28.8 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-4002: Long Beach, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 12 24 36 48 60
0 10 20 30 40 50 -15 -8 -1 6 13 20
01/01/2010 07/12/2010 01/20/2011 07/31/2011

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.16x + 2.92 R = 0.91 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R F 0 1 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R F 0 1 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 547 12.6 17.6 1.39 Winter 160 11.3 14.1 1.24 Spring 174 12.1 17.2 1.42 Summer123 14.5 22.7 1.57 Fall 90 13.4 17.3 1.29 2010 348 13.1 18.1 1.39 2011 199 11.8 16.6 1.40 2012 0 . . . 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 547 43.3 531 42.3 Winter 160 31.2 149 29.3 Spring 174 45.6 174 45.6 Summer 123 60.4 123 60.4 Fall 90 36.9 85 32.2 2010 348 43.2 340 41.4 2011 199 43.4 191 43.8 2012 0 . . . 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-065-8001: Rubidoux, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 16 32 48 64 80
0 14 28 42 56 70 -10 -3 4 11 18 25
07/01/2010 05/01/2011 03/01/2012 12/31/2012

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.19x + 0.51 R = 0.90 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall

A W R S F 0 1 2 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

0 1 2 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 646 13.7 16.9 1.23 Winter 101 11.7 11.6 0.99 Spring 57 10.3 14.2 1.38 Summer224 14.1 20.7 1.47 Fall 264 14.9 16.2 1.08 2010 173 14.0 18.3 1.31 2011 299 13.5 16.8 1.24 2012 174 13.9 15.7 1.12 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 646 18.9 607 23.9 Winter 101 -9.2 87 2.5 Spring 57 37.2 56 38.4 Summer 224 46.4 224 46.4 Fall 264 2.2 240 7.3 2010 173 27.2 163 30.3 2011 299 17.9 277 25.2 2012 174 12.2 167 15.4 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-065-8001: Rubidoux, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met-One BAM-1020 W/PM2.5 SCC-Beta Attenuation (731), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 14 28 42 56 70
0 14 28 42 56 70 -15 -6 3 12 21 30
08/02/2011 01/21/2012 07/11/2012 12/31/2012

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.10x + 3.34 R = 0.86 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W RS

F 1 2 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A R S F

1 2 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 465 14.4 19.1 1.33 Winter 88 12.5 17.0 1.37 Spring 75 14.8 20.0 1.35 Summer127 13.5 20.5 1.52 Fall 175 15.7 18.7 1.19 2010 0 . . . 2011 140 16.3 21.3 1.30 2012 325 13.5 18.2 1.34 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 465 38.8 456 39.5 Winter 88 55.2 81 63.7 Spring 75 34.3 75 34.3 Summer 127 52.5 127 52.5 Fall 175 22.4 173 20.7 2010 0 . . . 2011 140 29.7 139 30.4 2012 325 42.6 317 43.4 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-065-8001: Rubidoux, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=9



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 16 32 48 64 80
0 14 28 42 56 70 -10 -3 4 11 18 25
01/02/2011 01/01/2012 12/31/2012 12/31/2013

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.15x + 0.48 R = 0.89 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall

A W R S F 1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 812 13.2 15.7 1.19 Winter 177 11.9 10.6 0.89 Spring 139 12.0 15.2 1.26 Summer231 13.1 19.2 1.47 Fall 265 14.8 16.3 1.11 2011 299 13.5 16.8 1.24 2012 174 13.9 15.7 1.12 2013 339 12.5 14.8 1.18 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 812 15.2 755 21.7 Winter 177 -23 141 -8.1 Spring 139 25.5 136 27.3 Summer 231 47.8 231 47.8 Fall 265 6.9 247 11.2 2011 299 17.9 277 25.2 2012 174 12.2 167 15.4 2013 339 14.3 311 22.0 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-065-8001: Rubidoux, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met-One BAM-1020 W/PM2.5 SCC-Beta Attenuation (731), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 14 28 42 56 70
0 14 28 42 56 70 -15 -6 3 12 21 30
08/02/2011 05/22/2012 03/12/2013 12/31/2013

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.12x + 2.26 R = 0.89 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall
A W R

S F 1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A R S F

1 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 799 13.6 17.4 1.28 Winter 170 12.2 14.4 1.18 Spring 152 13.9 18.8 1.35 Summer212 13.0 19.1 1.48 Fall 265 14.8 17.2 1.16 2011 140 16.3 21.3 1.30 2012 325 13.5 18.2 1.34 2013 334 12.5 15.1 1.21 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 799 30.5 775 32.2 Winter 170 25.2 154 32.0 Spring 152 34.1 152 34.1 Summer 212 48.6 212 48.6 Fall 265 17.3 257 17.7 2011 140 29.7 139 30.4 2012 325 42.6 317 43.4 2013 334 19.0 319 21.9 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-065-8001: Rubidoux, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=9



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 12 24 36 48 60
0 10 20 30 40 50 -5 -1 3 7 11 15
01/01/2012 04/25/2012 08/19/2012 12/13/2012

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.29x + -0.48 R = 0.96 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall

A W R

S F 2 

### A=AllData,0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall A W R S F

2 

### A=AllData, 0=2010, 1=2011, 2=2012 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 254 10.7 13.3 1.25 Winter 72 11.0 13.2 1.20 Spring 91 9.9 12.7 1.29 Summer 57 9.5 11.7 1.22 Fall 34 14.1 17.9 1.27 2010 0 . . . 2011 0 . . . 2012 254 10.7 13.3 1.25 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 254 22.8 248 23.7 Winter 72 20.1 71 21.3 Spring 91 26.0 91 26.0 Summer 57 21.7 57 21.7 Fall 34 22.1 29 26.1 2010 0 . . . 2011 0 . . . 2012 254 22.8 248 23.7 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-4004: Long Beach, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

### 0 12 24 36 48 60
0 10 20 30 40 50 -15 -9 -3 3 9 15
01/01/2012 08/31/2012 05/01/2013 12/31/2013

-8 -4 0 4 8
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 1.27x + 0.35 R = 0.93 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher
Winter Spring Summer Fall

A WR S F 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall AW R F 2 3 

### A=AllData, 1=2011, 2=2012, 3=2013 W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 552 10.7 14.0 1.30 Winter 128 11.7 14.2 1.22 Spring 169 9.8 12.3 1.25 Summer134 9.4 12.8 1.36 Fall 121 12.5 17.5 1.40 2011 0 . . . 2012 254 10.7 13.3 1.25 2013 298 10.8 14.6 1.35 

### Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 552 29.7 541 30.8 Winter 128 20.8 124 22.2 Spring 169 23.5 167 24.8 Summer 134 36.3 134 36.3 Fall 121 40.3 116 42.1 2011 0 . . . 2012 254 22.8 248 23.7 2013 298 35.5 293 36.8 

# PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 

## Site 06-037-4004: Long Beach, CA FRM: Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS-GRAVIMETRIC (120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC-Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3



### Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: September 3, 2014

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics