alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Express Credit
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Erich Komdat, as Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



/s/Erich Komdat
------------------
Name:    Erich Komdat
Title:   Acting Chief Executive Officer
Date:    August 11, 2005

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under
that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

DANIEL LUGO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

I.D.B.T., INC., 

Defendant. 

/

Case No. 9:22-cv-81553-AMC 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

 Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby dismisses this action pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 

 Respectfully submitted this 5th day of January, 2023. 

s/Lee D. Sarkin 

 LEE D. SARKIN, ESQ. 

Attorney For Plaintiff 

Florida Bar No. 962848 

E-mail: LSarkin@aol.com 

DREW M. LEVITT, ESQ. 

Attorney For Plaintiff 

Florida Bar No. 782246 

drewmlevitt@gmail.com 

4700 NW Boca Raton Blvd. 

 Suite 302 

 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 

 Telephone (561) 994-3622 

 

Case 9:22-cv-81553-AMC Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2015 - 0951 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 20 15 - CE - 0 0 7 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

August 16, 2011

ERRATUM

______________________

Appeal No. 2010-1102,-1103

IN RE BRIMONIDINE PATENT LITIGATION

--------------------------------- ------------- ALLERGAN, INC.,

v.

EXELA PHARMSCI INC. and EXELA PHARMSCI PVT., LTD.,

and

APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP.,

Decided: May 19, 2011

Precedential Opinion

______________________

Please make the following change:

Page 11, footnote 1, lines 9-10, the text should be changed to read Dose Response Study” (“Derick”). The dissent

characterizes that article
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William S. Ayer

William S. Ayer
Chief Executive Officer
November 26, 2002
§ 83.25 Sailing vessels underway and vessels under oars (Rule 25). ( a ) A sailing vessel underway shall exhibit: ( i ) Sidelights; and
( ii ) A sternlight.
( b ) In a sailing vessel of less than 20 meters in length the lights prescribed in paragraph (a) of this Rule may be combined in one lantern carried at or near the top of the mast where it can best be seen.
( c ) A sailing vessel underway may, in addition to the lights prescribed in paragraph (a) of this Rule, exhibit at or near the top of the mast, where they can best be seen, two all-round lights in a vertical line, the upper being red and the lower green, but these lights shall not be exhibited in conjunction with the combined lantern permitted by paragraph (b) of this Rule.
( d ) ( i ) A sailing vessel of less than 7 meters in length shall, if practicable, exhibit the lights prescribed in paragraph (a) or (b) of this Rule, but if she does not, she shall exhibit an all-round white light or have ready at hand an electric torch or lighted lantern showing a white light which shall be exhibited in sufficient time to prevent collision.
( ii ) A vessel under oars may exhibit the lights prescribed in this Rule for sailing vessels, but if she does not, she shall exhibit an all-round white light or have ready at hand an electric torch or lighted lantern showing a white light which shall be exhibited in sufficient time to prevent collision.
( e ) A vessel proceeding under sail when also being propelled by machinery shall exhibit forward, where it can best be seen, a conical shape, apex downward. A vessel of less than 12 meters in length is not required to exhibit this shape, but may do so.
§ 3060.13 Valuation of liabilities. Within 6 months of January 23, 2009, and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Postal Service will develop the liabilities of the theoretical competitive products enterprise as follows: ( a ) Identify all liability accounts within the Postal Service's Chart of Accounts used solely for the provision of competitive products.
( b ) Identify all liability accounts within the Postal Service's Chart of Accounts used solely for the provision of market dominant products.
( c ) The portion of liability accounts in the Postal Service's Chart of Accounts that are not identified in either paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) of this section shall be assigned to the theoretical competitive products enterprise using a method of allocation based on appropriate revenue or cost drivers approved by the Commission.
( d ) Within 6 months of the effective date of these rules, the Postal Service shall submit to the Commission for approval a proposed methodology detailing how each liability account identified in the Chart of Accounts shall be allocated to the theoretical competitive products enterprise and provide an explanation in support of each allocation.
( e ) If the Postal Service desires to change the methodologies outlined above, it shall utilize the procedures provided in § 3050.11 of this chapter.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14821]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER98-3760-000; EC96-19-000 and ER96-1663-000]


California Independent System Operator Corporation and California 
Independent System Operator Corporation (Not Consolidated); Notice of 
Filing

June 7, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 26, 2000, the California Independent System 
Operator Corporation (ISO) tendered and Answer in the above-captioned 
docket. The Answer includes ISO Tariff sheets correcting several errors 
in the Tariff sheets submitted by the ISO as part of its Compliance 
Filing made in the above-captioned docket on April 20, 2000.
    The ISO states that this filing has been serve upon all parties on 
the restricted service list compiled by the Secretary in the above-
captioned proceedings.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedures (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be files on or before June 16, 2000. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriated action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on 
the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-
2222 for assistance.)

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14821 Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET OF  VALUABLE  VENTURES,  INC.  AS OF  SEPTEMBER  30, 2000 AND THE
RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

TO: Tina Ndoh, OAQPS/SPPD – Minerals and Manufacturing Group

FROM: Philip Crawford and Jason Renzaglia, ERG

DATE: May 19, 2014

SUBJECT: Summary of May 19, 2014 Telephone Communication between PCS 

Phosphate and ERG

On May 15, 2014, Philip Crawford of ERG contacted Ross Smith of PCS Phosphate via 

telephone and requested information on the operation of the venturi scrubbers controlling 

emissions from the phosphate rock calciners at the PCS Aurora facility. The purpose of the call 

was to clarify information provided by PCS Aurora in regards to operation of control technology 

for the calciner operations. Mr. Smith indicated he would follow-up with Mr. Crawford via 

telephone regarding the requested information.

On May 19, 2014, Mr. Smith indicated the following regarding the operation of the 

venturi scrubbers:

• The venturi scrubbers operate whenever the calciner is in operation.

• The venture scrubbers are part of the overall operation of the phosphate rock 

calciners.

• There are not permit conditions related to the operation of the venturi scrubbers.

• Operators verify flow through the venturi scrubbers.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > General Maximum Price Regulation

              																	Rothwell, Doris P.					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*General Maximum Price Regulation : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 879*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1946,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4334,			accessed on September 9, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the "Company") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 * information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Christopher Ryan
 Christopher Ryan
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 Date: August 14, 2009
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5246

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require home health

agencies participating in the Medicare Program to conduct criminal background checks for all applicants for employment as patient care providers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 21, 2000

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require

home health agencies participating in the Medicare Program to conduct criminal background checks for all applicants for employment as patient care providers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 5246 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIRING MEDICARE HOME HEALTH AGEN2 CIES TO CONDUCT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND

3 CHECKS ON ALL APPLICANTS FOR EMPLOY4 MENT AS PATIENT CARE PROVIDERS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1891(a) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395bbb(a)) is amended by adding

7 at the end the following new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(7) The agency submits to the Attorney Gen9 eral a criminal background request described in sec10 tion 124(a) of the Departments of Commerce, Jus11 tice, and State, the Judiciary and Related Agencies

12 Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in section

13 101(b) of division A of Public Law 105–277) for

14 each applicant for employment in a position involved

15 in direct patient care.’’.

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

17 subsection (a) applies to applications for employment

18 made on or after 90 days after the date of the enactment

19 of this Act.

Æ
#### SAMUEL L. NICHOLSON, Respondent, *v.*HEMAN WAFUL, Appellant.

*Evidence.*

In this action, brought against the defendant as the maker of a promissory note for $450, dated April 28th, 1878, he denied that he had ever made such a note, and alleged that, if he had ever signed the note, it was while he was intoxicated, and that he only received $250, for which amount he had given his note. Upon the stand he offered to show that in 1870 the plaintiff said he had not $100 ; that for some two years he was employed by a firm of millers, and *656received one dollar and fifty cents per day, out of which he had to support a wife and furnish a house; that in June or July, 1872, he said he had no funds, and could not raise $100; which evidence was, against the exception of defendant’s counsel, rejected. *Held,*error ; that it should have heen admitted, as tending to show that the defendant had never received the money.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

*K.*Whiting, for appellant. *Lansing dc Rogers,*for respondent.

Opinion by

Mullin, P. J.

Present' — Mullin, P. J"., Smith and Gilbert, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted before another referee, with costs to abide the event.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANTTO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, James J. Horvath, Chief Executive Officerand President of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”), does herebycertify that:

 

1.       The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended February 29, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

2.       Information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation ofthe Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or asa separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused thisinstrument to be executed this 14th day of April, 2004.

 

 
|                                         | By: | /s/ James J. Horvath |   |
|----------------------------------------------|-----|----------------------|--------|
| Name: James J. Horvath                       |
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Alaska Airlines, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2010; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August 11, 2010 | By   /s/ Brandon S. Pedersen   ‘Brandon S. PedersenChief Financial Officer |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|