P. 1 

# OAR Box 1781 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 80 ) IV-B-4 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/29/2008 10:46:21 AM Sheet 80 of 142P. 2

• S '

Date : To : February 29,200 0

Ai r an dRadiatio n Docke t

#A-90-3 7 From : To mDriscoll , Integrate dImplementatio n Grcfu p ITPID , MD-1 2 (&v* ^ \ > UACJ=.V V Subject : Pre-permi t Constructio n Activities ' Discussion s with STAPPA/ALAPC O I n Decembe r

1999, 1 contacte dSTAPPA/ALAPC O t o determin e wha t pre-permi t constructio n activity policie s Stat e an dLoca l Ai r Pollutio n Contro l Agencie s (S/Ls ) ar e currentl y using . STAPPA/ALAPC O agree dt o pol l th e S/L s an dsen dthei r response s t o me . Attache di s a tabl e summarizin g th e curren t S/ L pre-permi t

constructio n activities . Thi s effor t was undertake n i n conjunctio n with th e Ne w Sourc e Revie w reformeffort . Attachmen t cc : Pa mSmith , (MD-12 ) Jo n Devine , OG CP. 3 

## • > Program/ Contac t

Vermon t Dou g Ellio t Connecticu t Gary Ros e an d Chri s Jame s

Lincoln , Nebrask a Gary Wals h NorthCarolin a Donal dvan de r Vaart Virgini a C . L . Turne r

Illinoi s Ji mRos s Jacksonville , F L Stev e Pac e Ar e pre-permi t

constructio n (PPC ) activitie s allowed ? N o Yes , lan d clearing , concret e pa d pouring , etc . allowed . I t seem s tha t

PP C activitie s ar e allowe dfor

bot h majo r an dmino r sources . Yes , lan d clearing , grading , tre e removal , etc . Yes .
N o for major , PSD , an d nonattainmen t NS Rsources ; ye s for mino r sources . No . Lan dclearin g only . Ar e condition s

differen tfo r greenfiel d vs . existin g facilities ?


### No .

No t clear .
No .
No .

No . Ar e ther e

"equity i n th e ground " considerations ?



### Ther e i s acavea

t i n Stat e requirement s sayin g th e pre permi t constructio n PP C activitie s can b e use dfor anothe r purpos e No t clear .
Owner s incu r an y financia l ris k for an y PP C activities . Th e economic s o f BAC T ar e no t t o b e skewe db y consideration s o f replacin g a newl y constructe dunit . No t clear . Comment s



### Contract s ar

e no t supposedt o hav e apenalt y i f broken .

Th e answer s wer e no t clear t o me , s o I aske d fo r mor e info . Virgini ai s considerin g re g change s for mino r NS Ra s well .

Thi s polic y applie s t o th e entir e Stat e o f Florida . 

# 9-

# :yrP. 4

Program/ Contac t Michiga n an d Wayn e County Pau l Collin s an d Wend y Barrott Wisconsi n Dan L . Johnsto n Iow a Dav e Phelp s
Washingto n To mTod d
Do n DelPort o Carso n City , N V Icial Ata y Ne w Jerse y Ar e pre-permi t

constructio n (PPC ) activitie s allowed ? Yes , i f sourc e demonstrate s an economi c hardshi p an di s not subjec t t o PSD . No . Yes , everythin g i s allowe d excep t hookin g u p units ; onl y for source s not subjec t t o PSD . Yes , everythin g i s allowe d excep t installatio n o f units . N o for majo r sources ; unclear for mino r sources . Yes , source s subjec t t o PS D can clear lan d only . Source s subjec t t o nonattainmen t NS Rca n clear land , pou r foundations , an d construc t buildings . Ar e condition s

differen tfo r greenfiel d vs . existin g facilities ? No t clear .

No .

No .

Yes , i t seem s that additiona l PP C activitie s are allowe da

t existin g sites . Ar e ther e

"equity i n th e ground " considerations ? An y PP C i s at th e ris k o f th e source .

No t clear .

Wha t i s permitte di s wha t wil l b e allowed , nothin g else .

Th e owne r

i s at ris k for an y PP C activities . Comment s

Two separat e responses .

Thi s polic y applies t o Nevad aState wide .P. 5

Program / Contac t
Rand y Raymon d Missour i

Sa n Joaqui n AQMD , C A Seye dSahdredi n

Ba y Are a AQMD , C A Stev e Hil l Ar e pre-permi t

constructio n (PPC ) activitie s allowed ? Yes , sit e preparatio n fo

r majo r sources . Ther e i s a waive r availabl e for mino r source s tha t allow s everythin g excep t operation . Yes , gradin g installatio n o f foundation s an d utilitie s excep t for source s subjec t t o PS D o r Federa l NSR . Yes , grading , installatio n o f foundation s an d utilitie s excep t for source s subjec t t o PS D o r Federa l NSR . Ar e condition s

differen tfo r greenfiel d vs . existin g facilities ? Yes , som e item s prohibite da

t greenfiel dsite s may alread y b e a t existin g sites .

No t clear , but

I thin k i t doesn' t mak e a difference .
No t clear , bu t

I thin k i t doesn' t mak e a difference . Ar e ther e

"equit y i n th e ground " considerations ? An y PP C activitie s mus t hav e asigne d waive r sayin g th e Stat e ha s n o liability .

Th e owne r

i s at ris k for al l PP C activities .

Th e PP C activitie s allowe dwoul d b e neede dfor . an y kin do f building . N o rea l equit y i n th e groun dissues . Comment s



# H