alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATEPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFSARBANES — OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Thomas S. Astrup, ChiefFinancial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”), doeshereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has causedthis instrument to be executed this 15th day of July, 2009.

 

 
| By:    | /s/  THOMAS S. ASTRUP                                      |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  Thomas S. Astrup                                    |   |
|   | Title: Vice President-Finance and Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 173.25 Location of certificate of number.

No person may operate a vessel to which this part applies unless the certificate or lease or rental agreement required by § 173.21 is carried on board in such a manner that it can be handed to a person authorized under § 173.23 to inspect it.

[CGD 72-54R, 37 FR 21399, Oct. 7, 1972, as amended by USCG-2003-14963, 77 FR 18700, Mar. 28, 2012]
EXHIBIT 32.02




Section 1350 Certification




In connection with this report of ML Select Futures I L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  January 27, 2012







By  /s/ Barbra E. Kocsis


Barbra E. Kocsis


Chief Financial Officer and Vice President


(Principal Financial Officer)
AFS-12-006-E 

October 31, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10179B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0947 

Mr. Omer ErSelcuk 

President/Chief Executive Officer 

Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines 

1210 Watergut 

Christianstead, VI 00820 

Dear Mr. ErSelcuk: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10179, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 3, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., d.b.a. Seaborne Airlines (Seaborne Airlines) for an 

extension of Exemption No. 10179, as amended, to June 30, 2012. That exemption from § 

121.173(b)(2) and appendix K, paragraph 5a, of part 121 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations allows Seaborne Airlines to continue to operate DHC-6-300 wheel-equipped 

airplanes after the December 20, 2010, effective date without meeting certain aircraft 

performance requirements. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Seaborne Airlines. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10179, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10179, as amended, to 

June 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

David C. Gilliom 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
§ 80.835 Point Au Fer, LA to Calcasieu Pass, LA. ( a ) A line drawn from Point Au Fer to Atchafalaya Channel Light 34; thence to Atchafalaya Channel Light 33; thence to latitude 29°25.0′ N., longitude 91°31.7′ W.; thence to Atchafalaya Bay Light 1 latitude 29°25.3′ N., longitude 91°35.8′ W.; thence to South Point.
( b ) Lines following the general trend of the highwater shoreline drawn across the bayou and canal inlets from the Gulf of Mexico between South Point and Calcasieu Pass except as otherwise described in this section.
( c ) A line drawn on an axis of 140° true through Southwest Pass Vermillion Bay Light 4 across Southwest Pass.
( d ) A line drawn across the seaward extremity of the Freshwater Bayou Canal Entrance Jetties.
( e ) A line drawn from Mermentau Channel East Jetty Light 6 to Mermentau Channel West Jetty Light 7.
( f ) A line drawn from the radio tower charted in approximate position latitude 29°45.7′ N., longitude 93°06.3′ W., 115° true across Mermentau Pass.
( g ) A line drawn across the seaward extremity of the Calcasieu Pass Jetties.
[CGD 77-118a, 42 FR 35784, July 11, 1977. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981, as amended by CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7787, Mar. 6, 1986; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39172, July 1, 2013]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4853 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4853

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1568 South Glen Road in South Euclid, Ohio, as the ``Arnold C. 
                           D'Amico Station''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2000

Mrs. Jones of Ohio (for herself, Mr. Brown of Ohio, Mr. Traficant, Mr. 
   Ney, Mr. Boehner, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Gillmor, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. 
   Hobson, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Kasich, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. 
Oxley, Mr. Portman, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Regula, Mr. Sawyer, and Mr. 
 Strickland) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1568 South Glen Road in South Euclid, Ohio, as the ``Arnold C. 
                           D'Amico Station''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARNOLD C. D'AMICO STATION.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1568 South Glen Road in South Euclid, Ohio, and known as the 
South Euclid Station, shall be known and designated as the ``Arnold C. 
D'Amico Station''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Arnold C. 
D'Amico Station''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       9
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1995 
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                   10,869,474
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                          5,477,297
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               4,593,631      
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   67,529,717
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     66,843,000
<LOANS>                                 244,937,335
<ALLOWANCE>                               3,910,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          347,507,042
<DEPOSITS>                              294,047,309
<SHORT-TERM>                             19,530,423
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                       5,317,704
<LONG-TERM>                               1,000,000
<COMMON>                                  7,824,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               19,787,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          347,507,042
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          16,312,237
<INTEREST-INVEST>                         3,191,628
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            259,941
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         19,763,806
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                        7,220,805
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        8,276,319
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                    11,487,487
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               105,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (106)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                           9,059,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           3,564,842
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                2,259,506
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               2,259,506
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  4.74
<LOANS-NON>                                  789,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 511,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             694,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      0
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT made as of the 13th day of May, 2004 by and between AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation
(hereinafter the "Company") and MICHAEL GORIN (hereinafter the "Executive").

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated March 1, 1999, as amended subsequently by Amendment Agreements dated
September 1, 1999, August 13, 2001 and November 8, 2001 (hereinafter the "Employment Agreement"); and

WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive desire to further modify the said Employment Agreement.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

| |  | AEROFLEX INCORPORATED
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | By:                  
| |  |                      

---
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, June 16, 2000, 8 a.m.

PLACE: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, N.W., Room 
540, Washington, DC 20425.

STATUS:  

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of May 12, 2000 Meeting
III. Announcements
IV. Staff Director's Report
V. Police Practices and Civil Rights in New York City Report
VI. Future Agenda Items
    9 a.m.  Briefing on National Police Practices and Civil Rights

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: David Aronson, Press and 
Communications (202) 376-8312.

Edward A. Hailes, Jr.,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 00-14597 Filed 6-6-00; 12:38 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-00-M
#### § 4219.33 Plan rules concerning overdue and defaulted withdrawal liability.

Plans may adopt rules relating to overdue and defaulted withdrawal liability, provided that those rules are consistent with ERISA. These rules may include, but are not limited to, rules for determining the rate of interest to be charged on overdue, defaulted and overpaid withdrawal liability (provided that the rate reflects prevailing market rates for comparable obligations); rules providing reasonable grace periods during which late payments may be made without interest; additional definitions of default which indicate a substantial likelihood that an employer will be unable to pay its withdrawal liability; and rules pertaining to acceleration of the outstanding balance on default. Plan rules adopted under this section shall be reasonable. Plan rules shall operate and be applied uniformly with respect to each employer, except that the rules may take into account the creditworthiness of an employer. Rules which take into account the creditworthiness of an employer shall state with particularity the categories of creditworthiness the plan will use, the specific differences in treatment accorded employers in different categories, and the standards and procedures for assigning an employer to a category.
#### § 74.01-15 Charges for placement of temporary aids.

Charges for placement of temporary aids will be reimbursable and in accordance with Subpart 74.20 of this part. Where the placement of temporary aids other than those specified is made, a reasonable equivalence will be determined, and charges made accordingly.
Passport Potash Inc.: Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





AMENDMENT TO MINERAL PROPERTY OPTION AGREEMENT DATED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 

THIS AGREEMENT is dated for reference as of the
18th day of September, 2009 

BETWEEN: 

SOUTHWEST EXPLORATION INC., an

Arizona corporation having an address at |
19935 E Sonoqui Blvd., Queen
Creek, Arizona, 85242 

(the “Optionor”) 

OF THE FIRST PART 

AND: 

PASSPORT METALS INC., a company
duly 
incorporated pursuant to the laws of the Province 
of Quebec and
having an address at 608 – 1199 
West Pender Street, Vancouver, British
Columbia, V6E 2R1 

(the “Optionee”) 

OF THE SECOND PART 

WHEREAS: 

(A)                   The
parties hereto entered into a mineral property option agreement made as of the
30th day of September, 2008 (the “Mineral Property Agreement”) on the terms and
conditions more particularly set forth therein; and 

(B)                   The
parties have agreed to settle the October 1, 2009 scheduled cash payment of
US$225,000, pursuant to section 4.1(b)(ii) of the Mineral Property Agreement, in
shares of the Optionee valued at Cdn$0.09 per share. 

NOW THEREFORE THIS AMENDING AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in
consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the parties
do hereby covenant and agree as follows: 

1.                     
Section 4.1(b)(ii) of the Mineral Property Agreement is deleted and inserted as
follows: 

		
      “4.1 
	
      (b) 
	
      (ii) 
	
      on October 1st, 2009 issue 2,681,000 shares of
      the Optionee, at a deemed price of Cdn$0.09 per share, to the Optionor;”
      



2.                     
This Amendment Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts or by
facsimile, each of which shall together, for all purposes, constitute one and
the same instrument, binding on the parties, and each of which shall together be
deemed to be an original, notwithstanding that all of the parties are not
signatory to the same counterpart or facsimile. 




- - 2 - - 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have duly executed
this agreement as of the day and year first above written. 

	THE COMMON SEAL of SOUTHWEST 	) 	  
	MINERAL EXPLORATION was hereto 	) 	  
	affixed in the presence of: 	) 	  
	  	) 	  
	  	) 	c/s 
	Per: ___/s/ Floyd R. Bleak________________ 	) 	  
	               
         Authorized Signatory 	) 	  
	  	) 	  
	Per: ________________________________	) 	  
	               
         Authorized Signatory 	) 	  
	  	  	  
	  	  	  
	THE COMMON SEAL of PASSPORT 	) 	  
	METALS INC. was hereto affixed in the 	) 	  
	presence of: 	) 	  
	  	) 	  
	  	) 	c/s 
	Per: ___/s/ Laara Shaffer_________________ 	) 	  
	               
         Authorized Signatory 	) 	  
	  	) 	  
	Per: ___/s/ signed______________________ 	) 	  
	               
         Authorized Signatory 	) 	  
	  	)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

-0324 KALEB EDWARD DANIELS,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 8 2022

08/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0324
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7665

FREDDY L. WAMBACH, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. GEORGE HINKLE, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees, and CLAUDE M. HILTON, U.S. District Judge, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00714-TSE) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 2, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Freddy L. Wambach, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Freddy L. Wambach seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as procedurally defaulted. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wambach has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### Archive of Digital Boomer Seismic Reflection Data Collected During USGS Field Activity 08LCA01 in 10 Central Florida Lakes, March 2008

By: Arnell S. Harrison**Shawn V. DadismanJeffrey B. DavisJames G. Flocks**Dana S. Wiese

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds421

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL--6711-5]


Notice of Scientific and Technological Achievement Awards 
Subcommittee--Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An ad hoc Subcommittee of the Science Advisory Board will meet 
at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, DC, on 
June 22-23, 2000. Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. app. 2, and section (c)(6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6), EPA has determined 
that the meeting will be closed to the public. The purpose of the 
meeting is to recommend to the Assistant Administrator of the Office of 
Research and Development (ORD) the recipients of the Agency's 1999 
Scientific and Technological Achievement Cash Awards. These awards are 
established to honor and recognize EPA employees who have made 
outstanding contributions in the advancement of science and technology 
through their research and development activities, as exhibited in 
publication of their results in peer reviewed journals. In making these 
recommendations, including the actual cash amount of each award, the 
Agency requires full and frank advice from the Science Advisory Board. 
This advice will involve professional judgments on the relative merits 
of various employees and their respective work. Such personnel issues, 
where disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy, are protected from disclosure by section (c)(6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). In accordance with 
the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, minutes of the 
meeting will be kept for Agency and Congressional review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Flaak, Team Leader, 
Committee Operations Staff, Science Advisory Board (1400A), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, 
DC 20460, telephone: (202) 564-4546 or e-mail at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#07616b66666c297568656275734762776629606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="593f35383832772b363b3c2b2d193c2938773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 1, 2000.
Carol M. Browner,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 00-14460 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>