alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(b)

TXU ELECTRIC DELIVERY TRANSITION BOND COMPANY LLC

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF PFO

The undersigned, H. Dan Farell, Senior Vice President and Principal Financial
Officer of TXU Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 9th day of March, 2006.



/s/ H. Dan FarellName:

H. Dan FarellTitle:

Senior Vice President andPrincipal Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TXU Electric
Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC and will be retained by TXU Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Millennia  Tea Masters,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kevin B. Halter, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Kevin B. Halter
---------------------------
Kevin B. Halter
Principal Executive Officer

March 20, 2003
CMS Product No. 11833-N

Paid for by the U.S Department of Health & Human Services January 2018

Enroll in Medicaid:

For yourself, for your family, for your community.

Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) offers low-cost or free health insurance for 

you and your family. In many states, more adults than ever before may qualify for Medicaid. 

Who may be eligible?

• Children and teens up to age 19

• Parents (and other adults, depending 

on the state)

• Pregnant women

• People with disabilities

• Youth “aging out” of foster care

Eligibility depends on income, the size of your 

family and the rules in your state. 

When you enroll, you can get:

• Doctor visits

• Preventive care, such as immunizations, 

mammograms & colonoscopy 

• Prenatal and maternity care 

• Hospital stays 

• Mental health care

• Needed medications

• Children get vision and dental care 

(adults may get these benefits too)

American Indians and Alaska Natives who are 

eligible for Medicaid or CHIP: 

• Can still get care from your Indian care provider.

• Don’t have to pay premiums or co-payments.

• Indian trust income is not counted to determine 

eligibility and is protected from Medicaid estate 

recovery rules. 

You benefit by having greater access to health 

care services. Tribes benefit because their health 

programs get more resources.

To find out if you qualify, visit InsureKidsNow.gov

or call 1-877-KIDS-NOW (543-7669) or contact your 

local Indian health care provider for help applying.
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5117

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

the allowance of the child credit, the deduction for personal exemptions, and the earned income credit for missing children, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 5117 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Missing Children Tax

3 Fairness Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF MISSING CHILDREN WITH RESPECT

5 TO CERTAIN TAX BENEFITS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 151 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to additional

8 exemption for dependents) is amended by adding at the

9 end the following new paragraph:

10 ‘‘(6) TREATMENT OF MISSING CHILDREN.—

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Solely for the pur12 poses referred to in subparagraph (B), a child

13 of the taxpayer—

14 ‘‘(i) who is presumed by law enforce15 ment authorities to have been kidnapped

16 by someone who is not a member of the

17 family of such child or the taxpayer, and

18 ‘‘(ii) who was (without regard to this

19 paragraph) the dependent of the taxpayer

20 for the taxable year in which the kidnap21 ping occurred,

22 shall be treated as a dependent of the taxpayer

23 for all taxable years ending during the period

24 that the child is kidnapped.

25 ‘‘(B) PURPOSES.—Subparagraph (A) shall

26 apply solely for purposes of determining—
3

HR 5117 RFS

1 ‘‘(i) the deduction under this section,

2 ‘‘(ii) the credit under section 24 (re3 lating to child tax credit), and

4 ‘‘(iii) whether an individual is a sur5 viving spouse or a head of a household

6 (such terms are defined in section 2).

7 ‘‘(C) COMPARABLE TREATMENT FOR

8 EARNED INCOME CREDIT.—For purposes of sec9 tion 32, an individual—

10 ‘‘(i) who is presumed by law enforce11 ment authorities to have been kidnapped

12 by someone who is not a member of the

13 family of such individual or the taxpayer,

14 and

15 ‘‘(ii) who had, for the taxable year in

16 which the kidnapping occurred, the same

17 principal place of abode as the taxpayer for

18 more than one-half of the portion of such

19 year before the date of the kidnapping,

20 shall be treated as meeting the requirement of

21 section 32(c)(3)(A)(ii) with respect to a tax22 payer for all taxable years ending during the

23 period that the individual is kidnapped.

24 ‘‘(D) TERMINATION OF TREATMENT.—

25 Subparagraphs (A) and (C) shall cease to apply
4

HR 5117 RFS

1 as of the first taxable year of the taxpayer be2 ginning after the calendar year in which there

3 is a determination that the child is dead (or, if

4 earlier, in which the child would have attained

5 age 18).’’

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

7 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the

8 date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 26,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT D

Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 50-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2022 Page 1 of 4
OFICINA DEL PROCURAOOR ESPECIAL 

RepUblica Bolivariana de Venezuela 

[Coat of Arms) 

Office of the Special Prosecutor 

Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela)

Bogota, D.C., March 17th, 2022. 

PER-P-389 

Citizen

Luis Gamardo Medina 

Representative of Casa Express Corp. 

Via e-mail 

I am writing to you, in my capacity as Special Attorney General of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, in response 

to your communication dated March 2, 2022, in which you request a Letter of No Objection for Casa Express's application for License 

pending with the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, case number VENEZUELAEO13850-2021-874564-1. 

To that effect, the Office of the Special Attorney General of the Republic, under my direction, has examined your petition with the 

corresponding filings in which you state that you have registered the judgment from the Court of the Southern District Court of New York 

and have filed a motion in the Court of the Southern District Court of Florida to commence a supplementary proceeding seeking to execute 

real properties held in the name of corporations owned of controlled by Raul Gorrin Belisario for satisfaction with funds that 

according to OFAC and the U.S. Attorney's Office of South Florida he obtained through bribery and corruption. Likewise, you state that 

this procedure will be executed in full compliance with the GUIDELINES FOR PROCESSING THE PROPOSALS OF 

CREDITORS OF THE VENEZUELAN PUBLIC SECTOR TO SUE HOLDERS OF ASSETS OBTAINED BY ACTS OF 

CORRUPTION, issued by the Special Attorney General's Office and published in the Legislative Gazette No. 57, dated February 22, 

2022, and indicate that "we will not act against other assets of Venezuelan public entities to enforce the judgment obtained by Casa 

Express in the Southern District Court of New York ordering the payment of $43.3 million to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela for 

the non-payment of two (2) sovereign bonds". Likewise, in a subsequent act, you undertook the commitment to communicate this 

obligation to the Court of the Southern District of Florida in which the motion to commence the supplementary execution procedure is 

pending. 

In response to your request, this Special Attorney General expresses our willingness to grant the requested Letter of No 

Objection to be addressed to OFAC, under the terms of your request, which is attached hereto. 

Sincerely,

[Signature] 

Digitally signed by 

ENRIQUE JOSE 

SANCHEZ 

FALCON 

Date: 03/07/2022 

21:11:27 +01'00' 

Enrique J. Sanchez Falcon Special 

Attorney General of the Bolivarian 

Republic of Venezuela

Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 50-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2022 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 50-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2022 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 50-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2022 Page 4 of 4
§ 401.78 Required information. ( a ) Documentary evidence, comprising inspection certificates, load line certificates, crew lists, dangerous cargo manifest and the cargo stowage plan, shall be carried on board and shall be made available to any officer requiring production of such evidence.
( b ) Documentary evidence, comprising evidence of cargo declared, cargo manifest, dangerous cargo manifest and bills of lading, shall be kept by the agent, owner or operator for a period of five years, or until an audit has been performed by the Corporation or the Manager, whichever occurs first, and such documents shall be made available to an officer requiring production of such evidence.
( c ) When a Declaration of Security (DoS) is required between a vessel and the St. Lawrence Seaway, it shall be completed prior to entry into the first lock and will remain in effect until the vessel exits the St. Lawrence Seaway at the St. Lambert Lock or the Welland Canal at Port Colborne.
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended and secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471)
[45 FR 52380, Aug. 7, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 52915, Aug. 31, 2000; 84 FR 8984, Mar. 13, 2019]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Alaska Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William S. Ayer,
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge,





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










By   /s/William S. Ayer


William
S. Ayer


Chairman
& Chief Executive Officer


November
6, 2009
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 12.1
                       AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORPORATION
     (a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services
                                 Company, Inc.)

          COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              THREE MONTHS
                            ENDED MARCH 31,
                              (UNAUDITED)              YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                            ---------------   ------------------------------------------
                              2003    2002     2002     2001     2000     1999     1998
                             -----   -----    ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
<S>                          <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings:
Net income                   $  66   $  53    $  228   $  277   $  286   $  223   $  237
Income tax provision            35      27       118      140      150      120      128
Interest expense               216     230       916    1,458    1,459    1,130    1,190
                             -----   -----    ------   ------   ------   ------   ------

Total earnings (a)           $ 317   $ 310    $1,262   $1,875   $1,895   $1,473   $1,555
                             =====   =====    ======   ======   ======   ======   ======

Fixed charges -
   interest expense (b)      $ 216   $ 230    $  916   $1,458   $1,459   $1,130   $1,190
                             =====   =====    ======   ======   ======   ======   ======

Ratio of earnings
   to fixed charges (a/b)     1.47    1.35      1.38     1.29     1.30     1.30     1.31
</TABLE>

Note: Gross rentals on long-term leases were minimal in amount in each of the
periods shown.
#### § 230.41 Reconsideration of claims.

A written request for reconsideration of denied claims must be based on evidence recently developed or not previously presented. It must be submitted within 10 days of the postmarked date of the letter denying the claim. The ruling official shall advise the Asset Forfeiture Coordinator if a timely reconsideration of the denial is made. The Office of Inspector General, Office of General Counsel shall rule on the reconsideration request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

RELM Wireless Corporation

/s/William P. Kelly

William P. Kelly

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

August 8, 2007
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.360 Interim Safety Management Certificate: what is it and when can it be used? ( a ) A responsible person may apply for an Interim Safety Management Certificate when— ( 1 ) A responsible person takes delivery of a new U.S. vessel; or
( 2 ) Takes responsibility for the management of a U.S. vessel which is new to the responsible person or their company.
( b ) An Interim Safety Management Certificate is valid for 6 months. It may be issued to a U.S. vessel which meets the conditions of paragraph (a) of this section, when— ( 1 ) The company's valid Document of Compliance certificate or Interim Document of Compliance certificate applies to that vessel type;
( 2 ) The company's safety management system for the vessel includes the key elements of a safety management system, set out in § 96.220, applicable to this new type of vessel;
( 3 ) The company's safety management system has been assessed during the safety management audit to issue the Document of Compliance certificate or demonstrated for the issuance of the Interim Document of Compliance certificate;
( 4 ) The Master and senior officers of the vessel are familiar with the safety management system and the planned set up arrangements;
( 5 ) Written documented instructions have been extracted from the safety management system and given to the vessel prior to sailing;
( 6 ) The company plans an internal audit of the vessel within three months; and
( 7 ) The relevant information from the safety management system is written in English, and in any other language understood by the vessel's personnel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                         6
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                   384
<INVENTORY>                                    11,331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               23,146
<PP&E>                                         34,185
<DEPRECIATION>                                 19,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 45,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,659
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,716
<OTHER-SE>                                     22,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   45,629
<SALES>                                        54,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               54,914
<CGS>                                          40,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  49,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,609
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,625
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,625
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.48
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.3**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of U-Haul International, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Robert T. Peterson, Chief Financial Officer of U-Haul International, Inc.
      certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.







U-HAUL
      INTERNATIONAL, INC.,


a
      Nevada
      corporation




/s/
      Robert T. Peterson


Robert
      T.
      Peterson


*Chief
      Financial Officer.*




Date:
      February 8, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

DONALD J. TRUMP 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

/ 

Case No.: 9:22-cv-81294-AMC 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPEAR 

PRO HAC VICE, CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO 

ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVE NOTICES OF ELECTRONIC FILING 

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for 

Elizabeth Seidlin-Bernstein, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive 

Notices of Electronic Filing, pursuant to the Rules Governing the Admission, Practice, Peer 

Review, and Discipline of Attorneys in the United States District Court for the Southern District 

of Florida and Section 2B of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. This Court having 

considered the motion and all other relevant factors, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

The Motion is GRANTED. Elizabeth Seidlin-Bernstein may appear and participate in 

this action on behalf of Proposed Intervenors WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post, 

Cable News Network, Inc., NBCUniversal Media, LLC d/b/a NBC News, the E.W. Scripps 

Company, the Associated Press, Gray Media Group, Inc., d/b/a WCJB-TV, WJHG-TV, WWSBTV, and Bloomberg, LP. The Clerk shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings 

to Elizabeth Seidlin-Bernstein at SeidlinE@ballardspahr.com. 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 53-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 1 of 2
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at , Florida, this 

day of . 

 United States District Judge 

Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record 

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 53-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 2 of 2
Dismissed; Opinion Filed October 10, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-01222-CR

KEMONE DUANE RODGERS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 8

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA16-18372-J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck

On October 2, 2019, Kemone Duane Rodgers filed his pro se notice of appeal seeking to 

appeal the trial court’s “oral denial of the “DEFENDANT’S AMENDED MOTION TO SET 

ASIDE COMPLAINT.” We conclude we lack jurisdiction over this appeal.

A pretrial motion, such as appellant’s amended motion to set aside the information and 

complaint, may not be appealed until there is a final judgment. See Ex parte Smith, 178 S.W.3d 

797, 801 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); 

Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.). Therefore, any issues 

appellant may have with the complaint are not ripe for review. See Smith, 178 S.W.3d at 801; 

Apolinar, 820 S.W.2d at 794. If, however, he is convicted, appellant may challenge the information 

and complaint on direct appeal.
We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

191222F.U05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

KEMONE DUANE RODGERS, Appellant

No. 05-19-01222-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court 

No. 8, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA16-18372-J.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, 

Chief Justice Burns and Justice Whitehill 

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered this 10th day of October, 2019.