alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                         STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned is the Chief Financial Officer of Reclamation Consulting and
Applications, Inc. (the "Company"). This Certificate is made pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the report
on Form 10-KSB/A-2 of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the
"10-KSB/A-2 Report").

The undersigned certifies that the 10-KSB/A-2 Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the 10-KSB/A-2 Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

Date: February 12, 2008                              /s/ Paul Hughes
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Paul Hughes
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. and will be retained
by Reclamation Consulting and Applications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 154.1228 Methods of ensuring the availability of response resources by contract or other approved means. ( a ) When required in this subpart, the availability of response resources must be ensured by the following methods: ( 1 ) The identification of an oil spill removal organization with specified equipment and personnel available within stipulated response times in specified geographic areas. The organization must provide written consent to being identified in the plan;
( 2 ) A document which— ( i ) Identifies the personnel, equipment, and services capable of being provided by the oil spill removal organization within stipulated response times in the specified geographic areas;
( ii ) Sets out the parties' acknowledgment that the oil spill removal organization intends to commit the resources in the event of a response;
( iii ) Permits the Coast Guard to verify the availability of the identified response resources through tests, inspections, and drills;
( iv ) Is referenced in the response plan;
( 3 ) Active membership in a local or regional oil spill removal organization that has identified specified personnel and equipment required under this subpart that are available to response to a discharge within stipulated response times in the specified geographic areas;
( 4 ) Certification by the facility owner or operator that specified personnel and equipment required under this subpart are owned, operated, or under the direct control of the facility owner or operator, and are available within stipulated response times in the specified geographic areas; or
( 5 ) A written contractual agreement with an oil spill removal organization. The agreement must identify and ensure the availability of specified personnel and equipment required under this subpart within stipulated response times in the specified geographic areas.
( b ) The contracts and documents required in paragraph (a) of this section must be retained at the facility and must be produced for review upon request by the COTP.
###### Editorial Note on Part 67

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

#### § 67.10-40 Sound signals authorized for use prior to January 1, 1973.

Any sound signal authorized for use by the Coast Guard and manufactured prior to January 1, 1973, is excepted from the requirements in this subpart, except §§ 67.10-1 (b) and (c), 67.10-5, and 67.10-10, if the sound signal has a minimum sound pressure level as specified in Table A of Subpart 67.10 of Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations in effect on December 31, 1972, for the range required by § 67.20-10, § 67.25-10, or § 67.30-10.
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:AD-related information: 1) Disposition of Comments (no comments) 2) Signed Final Rule Grid
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

79–012 2018

115th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 115–130 

WITHDRAWAL OF AND REVISIONS TO PREVIOUSLY 

PROPOSED RESCISSIONS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

WITHDRAWAL OF FOUR PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED RESCISSIONS 

AND REPORTING REVISIONS TO SIX RESCISSIONS PREVIOUSLY 

TRANSMITTED TO CONGRESS, PURSUANT TO 2 U.S.C. 685(C); 

PUBLIC LAW 93–344, SEC. 1014(C); (88 STAT. 335) 

JUNE 6, 2018.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations and ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

In accordance with section 1014(c) of the Congressional Budget 

and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 685(c)), I am withdrawing four previously proposed rescissions and reporting revisions to six rescissions previously transmitted to the Congress. 

The withdrawals are for the Federal Highway Administration 

Miscellaneous Appropriations and Miscellaneous Highway Trust 

Funds accounts of the Department of Transportation, the Environmental Programs and Management account of the Environmental 

Protection Agency, and the International Disaster Assistance account of the United States Agency for International Development. 

The six revised rescissions, totaling $896 million, affect the programs of the Departments of Agiculture, Housing and Urban Development, Labor, and the Treasury, as well as the Corporation for 

National and Community Service. 

The details of the rescission withdrawals and each revised rescission are contained in the attached reports. 

DONALD J. TRUMP. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, June 5, 2018. 

2 


Insert graphic folio 3 here HD130.001
3 


Insert graphic folio 4 here HD130.002
4 


Insert graphic folio 5 here HD130.003
5 


Insert graphic folio 6 here HD130.004
6 


Insert graphic folio 7 here HD130.005
7 


Insert graphic folio 8 here HD130.006
8 


Insert graphic folio 9 here HD130.007
9 


Insert graphic folio 10 here HD130.008
10 


Insert graphic folio 11 here HD130.009
11 


Insert graphic folio 12 here HD130.010
12 


Insert graphic folio 13 here HD130.011
13 


Insert graphic folio 14 here HD130.012
14 


Insert graphic folio 15 here HD130.013
15 


Insert graphic folio 16 here HD130.014
16 


Insert graphic folio 17 here HD130.015
17 


Insert graphic folio 18 here HD130.016
EXHIBIT 99


<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                                   AGWAY INC.


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September  30, 2002 (the  "Report") of Agway Inc. (the  "Registrant"),  as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Donald P.
Cardarelli,  the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant  certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)    The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in
                all  material  respects,  the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Donald P. Cardarelli
------------------------
Donald P. Cardarelli
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Registrant  for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                       2

<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                                   AGWAY INC.


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September  30, 2002 (the  "Report") of Agway Inc. (the  "Registrant"),  as filed
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof,  I, Peter J.
O'Neill,  the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant  certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all
                material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
                operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Peter J. O'Neill
--------------------
Peter J. O'Neill
Senior Vice President, Finance & Control
November 14, 2002



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Registrant  for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.







                                       3
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SCOTT T

. JOHNSON
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2429

[ March 7, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Steven J

. Levin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562023CF000605A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., W ARNER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit99.1**

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, James J. Horvath,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report of American Crystal Sugar Company on Form 10-Q for the periodended May 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of American Crystal Sugar Company.

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American CrystalSugar Company and will be retained by American Crystal Sugar Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| By:    |  /s/ James J. Horvath                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
| Name:  |  James J. Horvath                      |
| Title: |  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 11, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00757

- CV

Michael TATSCH

, Appellant

v.

CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC and Infinity County Mutual Insurance Company,

Appellees

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texa s

Trial Court No. 12977

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is

GRANTED. The appellant ’ s reply brief is due on April 17, 2014.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN W ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Opinion issued July 31, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00132-CV

———————————

IN RE NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, NextGear Capital, Inc., has filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

challenging the trial court’s denial of its motion to dismiss based on forum-selection 

clause.1 We deny the petition.

 

1 The underlying case is Alireza Delavari Maryan d/b/a Texas Financial Group v. 

NextGear Capital, Inc., US Financial Auto Credit, LLC, Melissa Webb Bryant, and 

Saeid Hashemnezad, cause number 2017-63452, pending in the 151st District Court 

of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Mike Engelhardt presiding.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Brown, and Caughey.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Minnesotatimber industry: an assessment of timber product output and use**
 
1988 | 1990 | 1992 | 1997 | 2004 | 2007 | 2010
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.80/17:
Item Number:0083-B-26 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000645396
 
August 8, 2018
§ 162.215 Lake Tahoe, Nev.; restricted area adjacent to Nevada Beach. ( a ) *The restricted area.* The waters of Lake Tahoe shoreward of a line described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the high waterline with a line projected in a general southerly direction 200 feet from a point lying 310 feet west of section corner common to section 15, 16, 21, and 22, Township 13 North (Mount Diablo Base Line), Range 18 East (Mount Diablo Meridian); thence 300 feet lakeward at right angles to the high waterline; thence southeasterly approximately 2,170 feet to the projected south boundary line of the Forest Service property at a point 300 feet west of the high waterline; and thence east 300 feet to the high water line.
( b ) *The regulations.* No sail or motor propelled watercraft, except vessels owned or controlled by the United States Government and vessels duly authorized by the United States Coast Guard, shall navigate or anchor in the restricted area.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 13, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 37113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14899]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1100]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; Imation Corporation (Data 
Storage Products); Tucson, Arizona

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the City of Tucson, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 174, has 
made application to the Board for authority to establish a special-
purpose subzone at the data storage manufacturing and warehousing 
facilities of the Imation Corporation, located in Tucson, Arizona (FTZ 
Docket 62-99, filed 11/24/99);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (64 FR 67843, 12/3/99); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the 
application is in the public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status at the data storage manufacturing and warehousing facilities of 
the Imation Corporation, located in Tucson, Arizona (Subzone 174A), at 
the location described in the application, and subject to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of June 2000.
Troy H. Cribb,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14899 Filed 6-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
§ 402.4 Tolls. ( a ) Every vessel entering, passing through or leaving the Seaway shall pay a toll that is the sum of each applicable charge in § 402.12. Each charge is calculated on the description set out in column 1 of § 402.12 and the rate set out in column 2 or 3.
( b ) The toll is assessed against the vessel and its cargo for a complete or partial transit of the Seaway and covers a single trip in one direction.
( c ) The toll is due from the representative of the vessel within 45 days after the day on which the vessel enters the first lock of a transit of the Seaway.
( d ) Except as set out in paragraph (e) of this section, the Volume Rebate incentive cannot be combined (*i.e.*, applied to the same cargo movement) with either of the New Business Incentive or the Service Incentive Programs.
( e ) Except for cargoes that qualify for the New Business Incentive, any cargo being shipped by a liner or semi-liner approved under the Service Incentive program shall be eligible for the Volume Rebate Incentive.
[66 FR 15329, Mar. 16, 2001, as amended at 71 FR 14807, Mar. 24, 2006; 74 FR 10679, Mar. 12, 2009; 79 FR 13252, Mar. 10, 2014; 81 FR 14391, Mar. 17, 2016; 88 FR 15275, Mar. 13, 2023]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS JASSO NAVARRO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71291

Agency No. A077-970-851

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2014** 

Before: PREGERSON, LEAVY, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Jesus Jasso Navarro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s denial of cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion.

FILED

MAR 14 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

12-71291
Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in

part the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Navarro fails to address, and therefore has waived any

challenge to, the BIA’s removability determination. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,

94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding issues that are not specifically

raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s denial of cancellation of removal in

the exercise of discretion. See Bermudez v. Holder, 586 F.3d 1167, 1169 (9th Cir.

2009) (per curiam). Moreover, Jasso Navarro’s contention that he feels the United

States is the best place for him is not a sufficiently colorable constitutional claim or

question of law to trigger our jurisdiction. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552

F.3d 975, 978 (9th Cir. 2009) (“To be colorable in this context, the violation need

not be substantial, but the claim must have some possible validity.” (citation and

internal quotation marks omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 12-71291
#### In the Matter of the Petition of HENRY BAINBRIDGE and others, Executors, to have Revived and Continued an Action commenced and pending between RICHARD BAINBRIDGE, Plaintiff, and CHAS. F. LIVERMORE and others, Defendants.

*Revival of action.*

Appeal by defendants from an order made at Special Term, granting leave to revive, etc. . The application was not made until several years after the death of the party, the plaintiff being under a stay of proceedings.

The court *held,*that the revival of an action by the representatives .of a deceased plaintiff, was not a proceeding contemplated by, or embraced within the prohibition of a stay of proceedings. • That it could not be regarded as a proceeding other than to prevent the abatement of the action. That the authorities required the motion to revive to be made within the year, under section 121 of the Code. *(Allen*v. *Walter,*10 Abb., 379; *Matter of Bornsdorff*v. *Lord,*41 Barb., 211; *Coon*v. *Knapp,*13 How. Pr., 175; *Gordon*v. *Sterling,*id., 405 ; *Greene*v. *Bates,*7 id., 296.)

*E. P. Wheeler,*for the appellant.

*Robert Sewell,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs besides disbursements.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5095 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5095

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to complete a report regarding 
  the safety and monitoring of genetically engineered foods, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

  Mr. Tierney (for himself and Mr. Hinchey) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Agriculture to complete a report regarding 
  the safety and monitoring of genetically engineered foods, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT REGARDING GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOODS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the Secretary 
of Agriculture, acting through the National Academy of Sciences, shall 
complete and transmit to Congress a report that includes 
recommendations for the following:
            (1) The type of data and tests that are needed to 
        sufficiently assess and evaluate human health risks from the 
        consumption of genetically engineered foods.
            (2) The type of Federal monitoring system that should be 
        created to assess any future human health consequences from 
        long-term consumption of genetically engineered foods.
            (3) A Federal regulatory structure to approve genetically 
        engineered foods that are safe for human consumption.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out this section, 
$500,000 shall be available.
                                 <all>
```