alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-81576-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

 22-81977-CIV-CANNON

VPR BRANDS, LP,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHENZHEN WEIBOLI TECHNOLOGY

CO. LTD. et al., 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

VPR BRANDS, LP,

Plaintiff,

v.

IMIRACLE HK LIMITED and

HEAVEN GIFTS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER FOLLOWING SHOW CAUSE HEARING

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court following a Show Cause Hearing held on April 21, 

2023 [ECF No. 140]. The hearing was scheduled to address Plaintiff’s Motion for Civil Contempt 

against Defendant Safa Goods LLC and non-parties Orange Wholesale LLC, Haitham Shriteh, 

Ahmed Shriteh, and Taher Shriteh [ECF No. 121]. At the start of the hearing, the relevant parties 

notified the Court that they had reached a negotiated settlement to resolve the matter of civil 

contempt and also to dismiss Defendant Safa Goods from the action [ECF No. 121]. In light of 

that resolution, and as stated in open court, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

Case 9:22-cv-81576-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2023 Page 1 of 2
 CASE No. 22-81576-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart

 22-81977-CIV-CANNON

2

1. Plaintiff shall have until April 26, 2023, to submit a proposed order detailing the 

requested expansion of the scope of the Court’s Preliminary Injunction Order 

[ECF No. 83], along with an accompanying memorandum of law.

2. Defendants shall have seven calendar days following receipt of Plaintiff’s motion to 

file any response. 

3. The Court’s Amended Scheduling Order, filed contemporaneously with this Order in 

the consolidated action, accelerates the deadline for completion of mediation to August 

15, 2023.

4. Any further motion by the remaining Defendants to vacate the preliminary injunction 

is due on or before April 28, 2023. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 24th day of April 2023.

 _________________________________

 AILEEN M. CANNON

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 9:22-cv-81576-AMC Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2023 Page 2 of 2
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4830

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1859 South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Cesar Chavez

Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 12, 2000

Mr. GUTIERREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1859 South Ashland Avenue in Chicago,

Illinois, as the ‘‘Cesar Chavez Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 1859 South Ashland Avenue in Chicago, Illinois,

6 and known as the Pilsen Post Office, shall be known and

7 designated as the ‘‘Cesar Chavez Post Office’’.
2

•HR 4830 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘Cesar Chavez Post Office’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# NAME:

Employee Thrift Advisory Council.

# TIME:

10 a.m.

# DATE:

June 27, 2000.

# PLACE:

4th Floor, Conference Room, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Approve minutes of the May 19, 1999, meeting.

2. Report of the Executive Director on Thrift Savings Plan status.

3. November 15, 1999-January 31, 2000, Thrift Savings Plan Open Season.

4. Legislation.

5. New TSP record keeping system/investment funds.

6. New Business.

Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the Council. For further information contact Elizabeth S. Woodruff, Committee Management Officer, on (202) 942-1660.

Dated: June 6, 2000.

Elizabeth S. Woodruff,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 00-14739  Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-M
Ex-99.1 a)



                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
of GMAC Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about GMAC Mortgage Corporation and its
subsidiaries' (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards
("standards") identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS ("USAP") as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2000 included in the accompanying management
assertion (see Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the entity's compliance based
on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 26, 2001
NRCS, Civil Rights Division Presents 

Conflict Management Series

The Bully at Work

“What You Can Do to Stop the Hurt and Reclaim 

Your Dignity on the Job”

Live Meeting Webinar Conducted by: 

Linda Burroughs-Glover, ADR Specialist

USDA, Forest Service

Workplace Conflict Management and Prevention (CMP) Program

Wednesday, September 23, 2015 

1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. (EST)

What is bullying? How can you prevent bullying in the workplace? What are the 

differences between harassment and bullying? How can you stop the bully if you 

are the victim? Should you report to the agency about these problems? 

Participants will learn how to identify the behavior of bullying, to recognize the 

negative impact of bullying behavior, and to learn ways to stop bullying. All 

employees are welcome to attend including those that have never experienced 

workplace bullying. Bullying has no place at work! At last, there must be a way to 

stop the hurt...and stop the bullying. 

Live Meeting Log-In Information:

https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/usda/join?id=P76DRT&role=attend&pw=t%22d%

26*%3F5kS

For information about assistive technology and alternative format requests, 

please contact Linda Burroughs-Glover (lbglover@fs.fed.us) or (202) 205-1062. 

CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION

Toll-free: 1-888-844-9904 

Participant Code: 6715754 

Learn to identify the 

common types of 

Bullies in the 

workplace. 

Understand the top 

10 Bullying tactics 

we encounter in the 

workplace and how 

to manage them. 

Discover creative 

ways to handle 

workplace bullying. 

5601 Sunnyside Avenue, 

Room 1-2182-C 

Beltsville, Maryland 20705 

301-504-2181
#### § 26.07 Communications.

No person may use the services of, and no person may serve as, a person required to maintain a listening watch under section 5 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 1204, unless the person can communicate in the English language.

[CGD 90-020, 59 FR 36323, July 15, 1994, as amended by CGD 95-033, 60 FR 28329, May 31, 1995]
Exhibit 32(a)

TXU ELECTRIC DELIVERY TRANSITION BOND COMPANY LLC

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

The undersigned, T. L. Baker, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive of TXU
Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 9th day of March, 2006.



/s/ T. L. BakerName:

T. L. BakerTitle:

Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TXU Electric
Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC and will be retained by TXU Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Price Trends and Price Control in Foreign Countries Since VE-Day

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Price Trends and Price Control in Foreign Countries Since VE-Day : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 873*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1946,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4331,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
OSWER/OSRTI 

Washington, DC 20460 

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL)

***Proposed Site*** March 2010 

BLACKRIVERPCBS Jefferson County, New York 

 Site Location: 

The Black River PCBs site is located in northern New York State, east of Watertown, NY. 

 Site History: 

The Black River PCBs site consists of PCB-contaminated sediment that was at least in part the result of wastewater 

discharge from the Carthage/West Carthage Water Pollution Control Facility [i.e., the sewage treatment plant (STP)]. 

Historical information indicates that tanneries, paper mills, and other industries have operated along the Black River in 

the Villages of Carthage and West Carthage since the 1890s. Two active paper mills, one inactive paper mill, a 

machine shop, the Carthage/West Carthage STP, and a hydroelectric power plant are currently located along the Black 

River in the Villages of Carthage and West Carthage. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants: 

The source under consideration consists of PCB-contaminated wastewater discharge from the Carthage/West Carthage 

STP. The STP treats industrial and municipal wastewaters from the surrounding area and discharges its effluent to the 

Black River. The hazardous substances affecting the effluent and downstream sediments are PCBs (polychlorinated 

biphenyls). Sampling and analysis by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) in 

1998 showed the presence of PCBs in the Carthage/West Carthage STP influent. Analytical results indicated PCBs in 

both paper mill and municipal wastewaters. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

Effluent samples collected by NYSDEC in 1997 and 1999, and the sediment samples collected by EPA in June 2009, 

document PCB contamination of the Black River fishery. 

 Response Activities (to date): 

In June 2009, EPA completed extensive sediment sampling and confirmed the presence of PCBs downstream of the 

past and present paper mills and the STP. 

 Need for NPL Listing: 

The State of New York referred the site to EPA because the PCB contamination warrants further investigation. EPA 

received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change 

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.] 

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 108 (Monday, June 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: May 30, 2000, 65 FR 
34465.

Previously Announced time and Date of Meeting: May 31, 2000, 10 a.m.

Change in the Meeting: The following Docket No. and Company has been 
added as Item CAE-35 on the Agenda scheduled for the May 31, 2000 
meeting.

Item No.--Docket No. and Company

CAE-35
    ER00-1969-000, New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    EL00-57-000, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. New York 
Independent System Operator, Inc.
    EL00-60-000, Orion Power New York GP, Inc. v. New York Independent 
System Operator, Inc.
    EL00-63-000, New York State Electric & Gas Corporation v. New York 
Independent System Operator, Inc.
    EL00-64-000, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation v. New York 
Independent System Operator, Inc.

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14109 Filed 6-1-00; 11:40 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Argued and submitted January 19,

reversed and remanded February 15, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of Laurie Ann HARDIMAN, *Petitioner, and*Jeffery Donald HARDIMAN, *Respondent.*STATE OF OREGON, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, *Appellant, v.*Jeffery Donald HARDIMAN, *Respondent, and*Laurie Ann HARDIMAN, nka Blair, *Obligee.*

(90-0914; CA A84128)

889 P2d 1354

*112-aJanie M. Burcart, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

No appearance by respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*113PER CURIAM

Mother appeals from a judgment that reduced father’s child support obligation. On *de novo*review, ORS 19.125(3), we reverse and remand.

The parties ended their five-year marriage in 1990. The trial court awarded wife custody of their child and ordered husband to pay $235 per month in child support. Later, mother, through the Support Enforcement Division, sought a modification of father’s child support obligation. The referee entered an order reducing father’s obligation to $175 per month. Mother appealed to the circuit court. ORS 416.427(6). At the hearing, the parties gave evidence that father is remarried and mother is living with another partner. The trial court, in calculating the presumptive child care obligation of each parent, included the wages of each parent’s new partner. Next, it reduced the presumptive amount without applying any of the criteria under the guidelines and ordered father to pay $170 per month in child support.

The state appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in considering the income of each parent’s new partner in determining the presumptive child support obligation. We agree. In calculating gross income under the guidelines, the only items that are included are the parents’ income and, in some cases, their potential income.1 ORS 25.275; ORS 25.280; OAR 137-50-320(3); *Ainsworth and Ainsworth,*114 Or App 311, 314, 835 P2d 928 (1992).

Reversed and remanded to reconsider child support.

1

 The income of the parties’ new partners may be considered under OAR 137-50-330(2)(a)(J) to rebut the presumed amount.
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title: rwtrJj^e-^ /^^ /rg^^A^fy/^g^ Mdj/4^0 yj^uff/ihh / A/ ^ /4^r»- ^ 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s): 

1. E.0.12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3XE) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of hiformation and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

This document is not a final rule. 

This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

Signature 

^^ict H Kr/L 

Name 

//fi^c.f-iy uUa^'\ Or-/jr£, o f ^,-i/^(i^ jJLUff//e9^fifJ,. 

Tllle/Office "^ ^ f— r -fet 

Date
```

[111th Congress Public Law 20]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

Public Law 111-20
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To ensure States receive adoption incentive payments for fiscal year 
    2008 in accordance with the Fostering Connections to Success and 
  Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008. <<NOTE: May 15, 2009 -  [S. 735]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Protecting 
Incentives for the Adoption of Children with Special Needs Act of 
2009.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Incentives for the 
Adoption of Children with Special Needs Act of 2009''.
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESTRICTION ON PAYMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 
                    2008.

    Effective <<NOTE: Effective date.>> as if included in the enactment 
of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8), title II of 
division F of such Act <<NOTE: Ante, p. 774.>> is amended under the 
heading ``children and families services programs'' under the heading 
``Administration for Children and Families'', by striking ``That without 
regard to the fiscal year limitations set forth in section 473A of the 
Social Security Act, from the amounts appropriated herein, the Secretary 
shall pay adoption incentives for fiscal year 2008 in the same manner as 
such incentives were awarded in fiscal year 2008 for the previous fiscal 
year: Provided further,''.

    Approved May 15, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 735:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Apr. 2, considered and passed Senate.
            Apr. 29, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 3.01-5 Assignment of functions.

Section 888 of Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, authorizes the Commandant of the Coast Guard to exercise certain functions, powers, and duties vested in the Secretary of Homeland Security by law. The general statements of policy in the rules describing Coast Guard organization are prescribed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552 (80 Stat. 383, as amended) and 14 U.S.C. 503 (63 Stat. 545).

[CGFR 70-150, 36 FR 910, Jan. 20, 1971, as amended by USCG-2003-14505, 68 FR 9534, Feb. 28, 2003; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58275, Sept. 18, 2020]
69276609;1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 22-61764-CIV-DIMITROULEAS 

WILLIAM HAGERTY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

NEWREZ LLC dba SHELLPOINT 

MORTGAGE SERVICING and 

SELENE FINANCE LP, 

Defendants. 

_____________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on defendant Newrez, LLC d/b/a Shellpoint 

Mortgage Servicing's (Shellpoint) unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the 

amended complaint (Motion), and the court having reviewed the Motion and the record, and 

otherwise being duly advised in the premises, it is hereby, 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED.

2. Shellpoint shall file its response to the amended complaint on or before April 3, 

2023. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami-Dade County, Florida this ____ day of March 2023. 

__________________________________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies furnished to: counsel of record 

Case 0:22-cv-61764-WPD Document 29-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
#### § 80.1305 Chetco River, OR.

A line drawn across the seaward extremities of the Chetco River Entrance Jetties.

[CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7788, Mar. 6, 1986]