alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, James J. Horvath, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Crystal Sugar Company onForm 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2003 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of AmericanCrystal Sugar Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to American Crystal Sugar Company and will be retained byAmerican Crystal Sugar Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ James J. Horvath                  |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | James J. Horvath                      |
|   | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|        |        |                                       |        |  |

 

----
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              | RELM Wireless Corporation |                                              |
|-------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|              |                      |                                              |   |
| November 10, 2010 | By:                       | /s/ David P. Storey                          |   |
|              |                      | Name: David P. Storey                        |   |
|              |                      | Title; President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                 0000003449
<NAME>                ALEXANDER & ALEXANDER SERVICES INC.
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             804
<SECURITIES>                                       239
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                        24
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,318
<PP&E>                                             408
<DEPRECIATION>                                     286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,035
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            42
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          7
<OTHER-SE>                                         353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,882
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   952
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    114
<INCOME-TAX>                                        44
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 64
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        64
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
Merrimack

No. 7832

#### Frederick J. Martineau v. Raymond Helgemoe, Warden, State Prison and New Hampshire Parole Board

December 16, 1977

*1018Frederick J. Martineau, by brief, pro se.

*David H. Souter,*attorney general, and *Richard B. McNamara,*assistant attorney general, by brief, for the defendants.

Per curiam.

This is an appeal from a denial after a hearing of a writ of habeas corpus brought under RSA ch. 534 by the plaintiff. The plaintiff was convicted of first degree murder in 1960 and was subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment. He was paroled from prison in early 1975. On August 27, 1975, he was arrested and charged with violation of his parole. The arrest warrant alleged, *inter alia,*that plaintiff had kept late hours, had associated with a young married woman, and had been arrested and charged with attempted burglary, all in violation of his parole agreement. After a lengthy hearing, the parole board rendered a written decision in which the plaintiff was found guilty of these violations and was remanded to the state prison. Plaintiff then filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in superior court alleging that he was unlawfully detained at the state prison because his parole had been improperly revoked. The Superior Court *(Cann,*J.) denied the petition and it is from that ruling that plaintiff excepts.

 The issues before us are (1) whether the parole board abused its discretion in revoking the parole and (2) did the trial court err in denying the writ of habeas corpus ?

It is settled law that the board has broad authority and discretion. *Martel v. Hancock,*115 N.H. 237, 339 A.23 9 (1975) (per curiam); *see*RSA 651:37, :50-51; *cf. Gagnon v. Scarpelli,*411 U.S. 778, 790 (1973). However, the inquiry of the court in a habeas corpus proceeding is narrow, though subject to certain guidelines. *Martel v. Hancock,*115 N.H. at 239, 339 A.2d at 11. *See also Moody v. Daggett,*429 U.S. 78 (1976); *Gagnon v. Scarpetti supra; Morrissey v. Brewer,*408 U.S. 471 (1972). The acts of the board “must be upheld unless shown as a matter of law to have been arbitrary or capricious, or void for lack of the requisite statutory process.” *Martel v. Hancock,*115 N.H. at 239, 339 A.2d at 11.

*1019An examination of the entire record, including the transcripts, numerous exhibits and the parties’ briefs, failed to show that the board’s actions were arbitrary or capricious or that there was any lack of the requisite statutory process. The guidelines established by the *Morrissey*and *Gagnon*cases were all observed by the superior court, and it follows that the order is

*Petition dismissed.*
Exhibit 32.1

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | RELM Wireless Corporation            
| |                                      
| | /s/ DAVIDP. STOREY                   
| | David P. Storey                      
| | President and Chief Executive Officer



May 8, 2007
Presidential Documents

36307

Federal Register

Vol. 65, No. 111

Thursday, June 8, 2000

Title 3—

The President

Presidential Determination No. 2000–20 of May 31, 2000

Presidential Determination on Assistance for Peacekeeping in

Sierra Leone

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President, including under

section 10(d)(1) of the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, as amended

(22 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) (the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby determine that the furnishing,

without regard to section 10(a) of the Act, of assistance covered by section

10 of the Act that is provided in support of peacekeeping efforts in Sierra

Leone is important to the security interests of the United States.

You are authorized and directed to report this determination to the Congress and to publish it in the 

œ–

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, May 31, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00–14619

Filed 6–7–00; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
6

Fiscal Year 2012-13 District Budget

Actual Adopted Est. Act. Proposed

FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13

Licenses & Permits

Evaluation Fees 272,870 $ 227,989 $ 225,130 $ 209,840 $ 

Asbestos Notification Fees 106,281 104,030 74,038 82,400

Reevaluation Fees 562,193 1,027,164 1,004,000 868,795

Air Toxics (AB 2588) 5,949 6,553 5,882 5,461

Application Fees 109,489 98,344 113,712 113,300

Annual Emission Fees 906,927 919,622 906,927 933,180

Notice of Violation 285,638 175,000 503,666 175,000

Inspection Fees 13,221 19,615 17,998 19,615

Source Test Fees 55,020 61,800 61,800 87,515

DAS 357,483 368,207 368,207 379,204

Monitoring 554,606 565,732 565,700 582,588

Use of Money Interest 69,379 130,000 50,000 75,000

Federal, State, and Other Governments

Federal - EPA Grant 497,519 500,000 529,000 475,000

Motor Vehicle $4 1,342,619 1,383,333 1,342,512 1,360,000

Motor Vehicle $2 691,560 691,667 691,667 679,999

State-PERP 72,383 46,230 54,353 54,165

State-ARB 103,206 100,000 100,000 100,000

Other Governments 161,505 175,209 164,526 162,061

Charges for Services

Environmental Review 7,661 7,000 9,000 9,000

 349,335 343,001 343,001 369,149

 516,283 735,416 513,649 500,126

 663,520 746,008 697,324 686,769

Miscellaneous Revenue 4,044 8,629 2,100 2,040

Revenue Total 8,008,563 8,140,677 8,344,192 7,930,207

Other Financing Sources

Release of Designations 574,490 1,465,787 1,052,532 1,228,033

Revenue Plan Total 8,583,053 $ 9,606,464 $ 9,396,724 $ 9,158,240 $ 

REVENUE PLAN

Reimburseable Charges

AQAP Fees 

Carl Moyer Program

Actual Adopte

FY 2010-11 FY 2011

Operating Expenditures

Administration 3,495,809 $ 3,755,

 

Engineering & Compliance 2,264,750 $ 2,252,

 

$ 3,565,

2,745,222 

Operating Total 8,505,781 $ 9,572,

 

Other Financing Uses

Designated for Future Uses 77,272 $ 33,

 

Expenditure Plan Total 8,583,053 $ 9,606,

 

EXPENDITURE PLAN

Technology & Environmental Assessment

CHARACTER OF EXPENDITURESActual Adopte

FY 2010-11 FY 2011

Operating Expenditures

Regular Salaries 3,891,113 $ 3,839,

 

Extra Help - $ 11,

 

Benefits 1,677,877 $ 1,780,

 

Salaries & Benefits Total 5,568,990 $ 5,631,

 

Services & Supplies 2,652,335 $ 3,594,

 

Other Charges 165,563 $ 163,

 

Fixed Assets 118,893 $ 184,

 

Operating Total 8,505,781 $ 9,572,
§ 338.1 Purpose. ( a ) The procedures of this part, in addition to the provisions of 33 CFR parts 335 through 337, should be followed when undertaking Corps operations and maintenance activities involving the discharge of fill material into waters of the U.S., except that the procedures of part 336 of this chapter will be used in those cases where the discharge of fill material is also the discharge of dredged material, *i.e.*, beach nourishment, within banks disposal for erosion control, etc.
( b ) After construction of Corps Civil Works water resource projects, certain operations and maintenance activities involving the discharge of fill material require evaluation under the CWA. These activities generally include lakeshore management, installation of boat ramps, erosion protection along the banks of navigation channels, jetty maintenance, remedial erosion control, etc. While these activities are normally addressed in the existing environmental impact statement for the project, new technology or unexpected events such as storms or high waters may require maintenance or remedial work not fully addressed in existing environmental documents or state permits. In determining compliance with the applicable environmental laws and regulations the district engineer should use the CWA exemptions at 404(f) and NEPA categorical exclusions to the maximum extent practicable. If the district engineer decides that the changes have not been adequately addressed in existing environmental documentation, the procedures of this part should be followed.
[53 FR 14920, Apr. 26, 1988]
§ 221.2 Board of Governors. ( a ) *Composition.* The Board of Governors consists of 11 members. Nine governors are appointed by the President of the United States, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. Not more than five governors may be adherents of the same political party. The governors are chosen to represent the public interest generally, and they may not be representatives of specific interests using the Postal Service. The governors may be removed only for cause. The postmaster general and the deputy postmaster general are also voting members of the Board of Governors.
( b ) *Responsibilities.* The Board of Governors directs the exercise of the powers of the Postal Service, reviews the practices and policies of the Postal Service, and directs and controls its expenditures.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.618 Saugus River. ( a ) The following requirements apply to all bridges across the Saugus River: ( 1 ) Public vessels of the United States, state or local vessels used for public safety, and vessels in distress shall be passed through the draw of each bridge as soon as possible at any time. The opening signal from these vessels is four or more short blasts of a whistle or horn or a radio request.
( 2 ) The owners of these bridges shall provide and keep in good legible condition clearance gauges with figures not less than 12 inches high designed, installed and maintained according to provisions of § 118.160 of this chapter.
( 3 ) Trains and locomotives shall be controlled so that any delay in opening the draw span shall not exceed seven minutes. However, if a train moving toward the bridge has crossed the home signal for the bridge before the signal requesting opening of the bridge is given, the train may continue across the bridge and must clear the bridge interlocks before stopping.
( b ) The draw of the General Edwards SR1A Bridge, mile 1.7, between Revere and Lynn, shall open on signal at all times if at least a two-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
( c ) The Fox Hill (SR107) Bridge, at mile 2.5, shall operate as follows: ( 1 ) The draw shall open on signal, except that, from October 1 through May 31, from 7 p.m. to 5 a.m., the draw shall open after at least a one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
( 2 ) From noon to 6 p.m. on Thanksgiving Day, and all day on Christmas, and New Years Day, the draw shall open on signal after at least a one-hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
[CGD1 91-004, 56 FR 60064, Nov. 27, 1991, as amended by CGD01-94-150, 60 FR 51730, Oct. 3, 1995; GD01-02-026, 68 FR 59116, Oct. 14, 2003; CGD01-04-096, 69 FR 67058, Nov. 16, 2004; USCG-2014-0272, 79 FR 60977, Oct. 9, 2014]
§ 3030.129 Exceptions for de minimis rate increases. ( a ) The Postal Service may request that the Commission review a de minimis rate increase without immediately calculating the maximum rate adjustment authority or banking unused rate adjustment authority. For the exception in this paragraph (a) to apply, requests to review de minimis rate adjustments must be filed separately from any other request to review a rate adjustment filing.
( b ) Rate adjustments resulting in rate increases are de minimis if: ( 1 ) For each affected class, the rate increases do not result in the percentage change in rates for the class equaling or exceeding 0.001 percent; and
( 2 ) For each affected class, the sum of all rate increases included in de minimis rate increases since the most recent rate adjustment resulting in a rate increase, or the most recent rate adjustment due to extraordinary and exceptional circumstances, that was not a de minimis rate increase does not result in the percentage change in rates for the class equaling or exceeding 0.001 percent.
( c ) If the rate adjustments are de minimis, no unused rate adjustment authority will be added to the schedule of banked rate adjustment authority maintained under subpart G of this part as a result of the de minimis rate increase.
( d ) If the rate adjustments are de minimis, no rate decreases may be taken into account when determining whether rate increases comply with paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
( e ) In the next rate adjustment filing proposing to increase rates for a class that is not a de minimis rate increase: ( 1 ) The maximum rate adjustment authority shall be calculated as if the de minimis rate increase had not been filed; and
( 2 ) For purposes of calculating the percentage change in rates, the current rate shall be the current rate from the de minimis rate increase.
( f ) The Postal Service shall file supporting workpapers with each request to review a de minimis rate increase that demonstrate that the sum of all rate increases included in de minimis rate increases since the most recent rate adjustment resulting in a rate increase that was not de minimis, or the most recent rate adjustment due to extraordinary and exceptional circumstances, does not result in a percentage change in rates for the class equaling or exceeding 0.001 percent.
( g ) For any product where the attributable cost for that product exceeded the revenue from that product as determined by the Commission, rates may not be reduced.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  excerpted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      28,658
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               95,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                13,164
<INVENTORY>                                 39,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           159,273
<PP&E>                                     133,368
<DEPRECIATION>                              50,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             346,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       42,891
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                 13,348
<COMMON>                                     3,208
<OTHER-SE>                                 (43,643)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               346,568
<SALES>                                    153,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           306,911
<CGS>                                       87,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              190,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            70,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,080
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          21,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (14,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,163
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (16,261)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (42,033)
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (78,004)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (2.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (2.44)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.3**

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFSARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, ThomasS. Astrup, Chief Financial Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”),does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

1.     The Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of the Company.

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 16th day of July,2007.
|        | By:                             | /s/ Thomas S. Astrup |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Thomas S. Astrup          |
|   | Title: Chief Financial  Officer |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Cr Pr 2-2 (2-99)

Crop

Production


Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 4 NASS, USDA
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 5 NASS, USDA
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 6 NASS, USDA
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 8 NASS, USDA
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 10 NASS, USDA

Crop Summary: Area Planted and Harvested, United States, 1998-99

(Metric Units) 1

Crop

Area Planted Area Harvested

1998 1999 1998 1999

Hectares Hectares Hectares Hectares

Grains & Hay

 Barley

 Corn for Grain 


Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 13 NASS, USDA

January Weather Summary

A very cold pattern east of the Rockies yielded to coast-to-coast warmth. Cold air clung most stubbornly

across the Upper Midwestern and Great Lakes States, where snowfall from an early-month blizzard and

subsequent storms helped to suppress temperatures. Most of the eastern Corn Belt’s snow melted after mid-
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 14 NASS, USDA
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 16 NASS, USDA

Almonds: California almond production is unchanged from the January estimate of 520 million meat pounds. 

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on the basis of

race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or

family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative

means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the

USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).