alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aceto Corporation, a New York
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Douglas Roth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Douglas Roth
----------------
Douglas Roth
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2003
** EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

 

Advaxis, Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (No. 333-130080) on Form S-8 of Advaxis, Inc. (a development stage company) of our report dated January 26, 2012, relatingto our audit of the October 31, 2011 financial statements, which appear in this October 31, 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K ofAdvaxis, Inc.

 

/s/ MCGLADREY LLP

 

New York, New York

February 13, 2013
§ 162.140 Connecting waters from Lake Huron to Lake Erie; miscellaneous rules. ( a ) *Rules for towing vessels.* ( 1 ) A towing vessel may drop or anchor its tows only in accordance with the provisions of § 162.136.
( 2 ) A towing vessel engaged in arranging its tow shall not obstruct the navigation of other vessels.
( b ) *Pilots.* In the St. Clair River between Lake Huron Cut Lighted Buoy 1 and Port Huron Traffic Lighted Buoy, vessels shall not take on, discharge, or exchange pilots unless weather conditions would make the maneuver unsafe in the customary pilot area.
[CGD 78-151, 49 FR 18302, Apr. 30, 1984]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David P. Storey, Chief Executive Officer of RELM Wireless Corporation, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RELM Wireless Corporation; 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 8, 2007

/s/David P. Storey

David P. Storey 

President and Chief Executive Officer
2002 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-19-2002

Schnall v. Amboy Natl Bank

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 1-1502

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2002 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Schnall v. Amboy Natl Bank" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 189.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/189
 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 No. 01-1502 

 ________________ 

 MARTIN SCHNALL, individually and on behalf 

 of all others Similarly Situated, Appellant 

 v. 

 AMBOY NATIONAL BANK 

 (D.C. Civ. No. 99-cv-04908) 

 _________________________________________ 

 Argued: November 6, 2001 

 Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, McKEE and RENDELL 

 Circuit Judges. 

 (Opinion filed January 28, 2002) 

 ____________________ 

 ORDER AMENDING OPINION 

 _______________________ 

 The slip opinion filed on January 28, 2002 in the above case is 

hereby amended as 

follows: 

 1. On page 18, third line from the bottom, change the word "banks" 

to "a bank." 

 2. On page 22, lines 9-10, the word pari passu and raison d'etre 

should be 

italicized. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Edward R. Becker 

 Chief Judge 

DATED: March 19, 2002
§ 187.311 Maintenance of and access to files. ( a ) For each record relating to a certificate of title submitted to the office, the office must— ( 1 ) Ascertain or assign the hull identification number (HIN) for the vessel in accordance with 33 CFR part 181;
( 2 ) Maintain the HIN and all the information submitted with the application pursuant to § 187.307(b) to which the record relates, including the date and time the record was delivered to the office;
( 3 ) Maintain the files for public inspection subject to paragraph (e) of this section; and
( 4 ) Index the files of the office as required by paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The office must maintain in its files the information contained in all certificates of title created under this subpart. The information in the files of the office must be searchable by the HIN of the vessel, the vessel number, the name of the owner of record, and any other method used by the office.
( c ) The office must maintain in its files, for each vessel for which it has created a certificate of title, all title brands known to the office, the name of each secured party known to the office, the name of each person known to the office to be claiming an ownership interest, and all stolen-property reports the office has received.
( d ) Upon request, for safety, security, or law-enforcement purposes, the office must provide to Federal, State, or local government the information in its files relating to any vessel for which the office has issued a certificate of title.
( e ) Except as otherwise provided by laws of the titling State, the information required under § 187.309 is a public record, but the information provided under § 187.307(b)(3) is not a public record.
§ 337.6 Statement of Findings (SOF). Upon completion of the evaluation process including required coordination, receipt or waiver of required state certifications, and completion of the appropriate environmental documents, an SOF will be prepared. In cases involving an EIS, a ROD will be prepared in accordance with 33 CFR part 230 and should be used in lieu of the SOF, providing the substantive parts of this section are included in the ROD. The SOF need not duplicate information contained in supporting environmental documents but rather may incorporate it by reference. The SOF should include a comprehensive summary and record of compliance and should be prepared in the following format except that the procedures of 33 CFR 325.2 should be followed for related activities of local interests. ( a ) The SOF should identify the name of the preparer, date (which may not necessarily correspond to the date signed), and name of waterway.
( b ) The proposed action for which the findings are made should be described.
( c ) A coordination section should be provided. The coordination section should reference the public notice number and date. The letters of comment and appropriate responses should be summarized. Any coordination undertaken by local or state agencies should also be discussed.
( d ) An environmental effects and impacts section should be used to document compliance with the applicable environmental laws. This section should include the views and/or conditions of the state concerning water quality certification and, if required, the results of the coastal zone consistency process.
( e ) A determinations section should reference the results of the EA and/or EIS and any conditions necessary to meet the state's water quality standards or coastal zone management program. Appropriate conditions or modifications should be included in the project specifications. This section should also contain a subsection on consideration of alternatives and cumulative impacts.
( f ) A section on the district engineer's findings and conclusions concerning the proposed project should be included.
( g ) The SOF should be dated and signed by the district engineer or his designee except in those cases requiring referral to higher authority.
( h ) In accordance with the provisions of section 104(g) of the ODA, the district engineer will forward a copy of the SOF to the District Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, if the activity involves the ocean disposal of dredged material.
( i ) The Findings of No Significant Impact or ROD, as appropriate, required by 33 CFR part 230 may be incorporated into the SOF, as appropriate.
Merrimack

No. 7983

#### Walter Morse & a. v. Donald Ford & a.

April 25, 1978

*Sulloway, Hollis, Godfrey & Soden,*of Concord *(Peter F. Imse*orally), for the plaintiffs.

*L. Wilder Quint,*of Concord, by brief and orally, for the defendants.

Memorandum Opinion

This case concerns the propriety of an award of attorney’s fees to an indemnitee in a suit for indemnification. The parties in this case were all defendants in a prior action for damages. That case was settled for $47,000, the plaintiffs in the instant case paying one-half that sum and the defendants paying the other $23,500. The plaintiffs had offered the defendants the opportunity to defend that action, which was refused. Consequently, under our long-standing law, the plaintiffs were able to maintain an action foj indemnification. *Chase**281*v. Bennett,*59 N.H. 394 (1879). The jury returned a verdict for Mary Morse for one-half the amount sought, $11,750, and a verdict against Walter Morse. *See generally Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Philip,*112 N.H. 282, 294 A.2d 211 (1972). The defendants have paid that judgment.

Mary Morse then moved for attorney’s fees and costs for the entire litigation. After a hearing *in camera, Cann,*J., awarded attorney’s fees and costs in full. The defendants argue that either there is no right to attorney’s fees in an indemnification proceeding or because both plaintiffs did not prevail, they should not have to pay fees and costs. They do not challenge the amount of the fees or seek an apportionment between the plaintiffs. We affirm the order.

A prevailing party in New Hampshire will recover attorney’s fees when that recovery is authorized by statute, an agreement between the parties, or an established judicial exception to the general rule that precludes recovery of such fees. *Utica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Plante,*106 N.H. 525, 526, 214 A.2d 742, 743 (1965). *See generally,*Doleac, *Court Awarded Attorneys Fees Under New Hampshire Common Law,*17 N.H.B.J. 134 (1976). Our cases have held that attorney’s fees are proper when an indemnitor is primarily responsible for the injury to the third party. *Hubbard v. Gould,*74 N.H. 25, 28, 64 A. 668, 670 (1906) (dictum); *Fairfield v. Day,*71 N.H. 63, 51 A. 263 (1901) (by implication); *French v. Parish,*14 N.H. 496 (1843). The underlying facts of this case are quite similar to those *oí Hubbard*and the award of attorney’s fees fall squarely within the language of that case. We find no basis to conclude that the amount of fees is unreasonable. *See Couture v. Mammoth Groceries, Inc.,*117 N.H. 294, 371 A.2d 1184 (1977).

*Exception overruled.*
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

EDWARD COBBS , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1953

[ October 25, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Paul L. Backman

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 13

- 4100 CF10A, 14

- 1684 CF 10A, 14

- 4474 CF 10A

.
Edward Cobbs, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

L EVINE , K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.01
                            PRESIDENT'S CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Schimatic Cash
Transactions Network.com, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Miki Radivojsa, Chief Executive Officer and President, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       Company Name

Dated: January 29, 2008                By:  /s/ Miki Radivojsa
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Miki Radivojsa
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 21 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/13/2000 Page 1 of 1
§ 3.70-20 Activities Far East Marine Inspection Zone. ( a ) Activities Far East's office is located in Yokota, Japan. The boundaries of Activities Far East's Marine Inspection Zone coincide with the boundaries of the Fourteenth Coast Guard District, which are described in § 3.70-1, excluding those areas within the Honolulu and Guam Marine Inspection Zones, as described in this part.
( b ) Only for this part, the boundary between Activities Far East and Activities Europe Marine Inspection Zones is demarked by a southerly line bisecting the border of the Republic of India and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
[USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36277, June 25, 2010]
Exhibit 32(e)



                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi
Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we, the undersigned, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and
belief, that:

(1)      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi Power Company for the
         quarter ended March 31, 2005, which this statement accompanies, fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
         Mississippi Power Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of Mississippi Power Company.

                                             /s/Anthony J. Topazi
                                               Anthony J. Topazi
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer


                                             /s/Frances V. Turnage
                                              Frances V. Turnage
                                         Vice President, Treasurer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer

Date:  May 4, 2005
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Activities

															Home/Activities ActivitiesADR2022-02-17T20:18:18-05:00
			
			ActivitiesThe President’s Executive Memorandum proposed providing assistance to federal agencies in the development of ADR programs through the operation of a number of smaller entities that can focus on subject-specific tasks.. At present, it is contemplated that there will be four such entities. They are as follows:
The Workplace Conflict Management Section
The Contracts and Procurement Section
The Enforcement and Regulatory Section
The Litigation Claims Against the Government SectionEach of these sections will have as its Chair a senior government official from an agency that has made significant progress in developing a dispute resolution program in that subject. Each section will also have the ability to call upon federal employees who are ADR experts in establishing dispute resolution programs in that field. Thus, agencies that decide to establish programs to resolve contract or procurement disputes will be able to obtain advice, guidance, information sharing and exposure to “best-ADR-practices” through participation in the Contracts and Procurement Section. Section meetings will address subjects such as program design, training, identification of neutrals, and systems of evaluation. Of course, ultimate responsibility for the development of dispute resolution programs and implementation of the mandate contained in the Presidential Memorandum of May 1, 1998, will remain with each agency. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
§ 162.160 Vermilion, Lorain, Cleveland, Fairport, Ashtabula, and Conneaut Harbors, Ohio. ( a ) In Vermilion Harbor, no vessel may exceed 6 miles per hour.
( b ) In Lorain, Cleveland, Fairport, Ashtabula, and Conneaut Harbors, no vessel may exceed 6 miles per hour, except in the outer harbors, where no vessel may exceed 10 miles per hour.
Note:
The Corps of Engineers also has regulations dealing with these areas in 33 CFR Part 207.
[CGD 79-151, 46 FR 7960, Jan. 26, 1981]
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

MAY 1 5 Z015 

Mr. Todd Berkey 

Sr. Director, Engineering & Maintenance Programs 

Atlas Air 

2000 Westchester A venue, 2nd Floor 

Purchase, New York 10577-2543 

Dear Mr. Berkey: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter dated April20, 2015, requesting exemption from 

§§ 25.785(j), 25.857(e), and 25.1447(c)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. The 

exemption, if granted, would allow up to three non-crewmembers (commonly referred to as 

supernumeraries) access to the Class E cargo compartment during flight on all Boeing 7 4 7-

400F airplanes operated by Atlas Air. 

Your request was posted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket Management 

System (at Regulations.gov) on May 5, 2015, and has been assigned Docket No. FAA-2015-

1410. We are in the process of reviewing your request. We will contact you ifwe need 

additional information. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mr. Alan Sinclair at (425) 227-2195, or by e-mail at Alan.Sinclair@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

JJM0-M,~ 

Deana M. Stedman 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service