alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation (the
Registrants) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies with respect to each
registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated as of November 7, 2006



|   |  |                                                
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|By |  | /s/ Wm. Michael Warren, Jr.                    
|   |  | Wm. Michael Warren, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
|   | 
|By |  | /s/ G. C. Ketcham                              
|   |  | G. C. Ketcham Chief
Financial Officer          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation
and will be retained by Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISSOLVEMENT OF LAS MINITAS GROUPINGS JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT DISSOLVEMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT ENCOMPASSING THE LAS MINITAS GROUPINGS EXECUTED BETWEEN TARA GOLD RESOURCES CORP. AND RAVEN GOLD CORP. DATED AUGUST 23, 2006. WHEREAS: A. Raven Gold Corp. and Tara Gold Resources Corp. hereby this day, mutually agree to release and dissolve the Las Minitas GroupingsAgreement dated August 23, 2006 encompassing the Las Minitas Groupings as attached in Schedule A, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Las Minitas GroupingsAgreement dated March 30, 2007, as attached in Schedule B. Tara Gold Resources Corp. and Raven Gold Corp. hereby agree to the following: 1) All commitments and obligations outlined in the August 23, 2006 Agreement are hereby released and dissolved. 2) Neither Raven Gold Corp. nor Tara Gold Resources Corp. will hold any claim of gain or liability, now or in the future, regarding the August 23, 2006 Agreement and its mutual dissolution. 3) Raven Gold Corp. will have no further recourse against the properties/concessions outlined in the August 23, 2006 Agreement or against Tara Gold Resources Corp. 4) All discussions, meetings, documents, findings and any information exchanged related to the Las Minitas Groupings, between Raven Gold Corp. and Tara Gold Corp., are considered confidential and cannot be shared without the written consent of the other party. 5) Tara Gold Resources Corp. continues to hold the sole option to acquire 100% interest in the Las Minitas Groupings. Kindly signify your acceptance of the terms contained herein by signing in the appropriate space below and returning a copy of the fully executed term sheet to Tara Gold Resources Corp. to the attention of the President by facsimile at 630-456-4135.  Upon receipt by facsimile as aforesaid, the August 23, 2006 Agreement will be considered released and dissolved and a binding obligation of the parties will have been formed. The above noted terms are hereby accepted this 3rd day of May, 2007. TARA GOLD RESOURCES CORP. RAVEN GOLD CORP. Per: Per: _/s/Francis R. Biscan Jr.               ­­­­­­­­­­­______ _/s/GH___________________________
Francis R. Biscan Jr., President and CEO Gary Haukeland, CEO and Director  Schedule A Las Minitas Groupings Agreement Dated August 23, 2006  Schedule B Amendment No. 1 to the Las Minitas Groupings Agreement Dated March 30, 2007
§ 179.13 Initial report to the Commandant. ( a ) When a manufacturer gives a notification required under 46 U.S.C. 4310, the manufacturer shall concurrently send to the Commandant by certified mail— ( 1 ) A true or representative copy of each notice, bulletin, and other communication given to persons required to be notified under 46 U.S.C. 4310(c);
( 2 ) The manufacturer's best estimate of the total number of boats or items of associated equipment potentially affected by the defect or failure to comply with a standard or regulation prescribed under 46 U.S.C. 4302; and
( 3 ) If discovered or determined by the manufacturer, a chronology of all principal events upon which the determination is based.
( b ) A manufacturer may submit an item required by paragraph (a) of this section that is not available at the time of submission to the Commandant when it becomes available if the manufacturer explains why it was not submitted within the time required and estimates when it will become available.
[CGD 72-55R, 37 FR 15776, Aug. 4, 1972, as amended by CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13926, Mar. 28, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.50-35 Eleventh Coast Guard District. ( a ) *Description.* See § 3.55-1 of this chapter.
( b ) *Line of Demarcation.* The line of demarcation described in this section is for administrative purposes to distinguish between the areas in which structures shall be subject to Class “A”, “B”, or “C” requirements. The line delimits the areas to seaward of which class “A” requirements are imposed. The line of demarcation within the jurisdiction of the District Commander is defined as follows: ( 1 ) Commencing at a point of latitude 41°59.8′ N., longitude 124°19.5′ W., thence southward along the seaward limit of the territorial sea to;
( 2 ) A point at latitude 32°32.0′ N, longitude 117°11.0′ W.
( c ) Structures located within a half nautical mile of Traffic Separation Scheme Los Angeles/Long Beach will also be subject to class “A” requirements. The traffic separation scheme is depicted on National Ocean Service Charts 18740, 18720, 18725, 18746, 18721.
[CGD11-86-02, 52 FR 37613, Oct. 8, 1987]
§ 334.450 Cape Fear River and tributaries at Sunny Point Army Terminal, Brunswick County, NC; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* That portion of Cape Fear River due west of the main ship channel extending from U.S. Coast Guard buoy No. 35 (34°02′03.218′′ N, 077°56′28.755′′ W) at the north approach channel to Sunny Point Army Terminal to U.S. Coast Guard buoy No. 27 (33°58′16.12′′ N, 077°56′59.736′′ W) at the south approach channel to Sunny Point Army Terminal and all waters of its tributaries therein.
( b ) Except in cases of extreme emergency, all persons or vessels of any size or rafts other than those authorized by the Commander, Sunny Point Army Terminal, are prohibited from entering this area without prior permission of the enforcing agency.
( c ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, Sunny Point Army Terminal, Southport, North Carolina, and such agencies as he/she may designate.
[75 FR 53198, Aug. 31, 2010]
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                            Mattress Showrooms, Inc.
                                (the Corporation)

We, the  undersigned,  Nelson  Vazquez  (President/Director)  and Douglas Ansell
(Secretary/Director) of the Corporation do hereby certify:

t 0 0 That the board of Directors of the  Corporation at a meeting duly convened
and held on the 24th day of  January  1997,  adopted a  resolution  to amend the
original articles as follows:

                        Article VII is hereby RESCINDED.

The number of shares of the  Corporation  outstanding and entitled to vote on an
amendment to the Articles of  Incorporation  are 2,500 (prior to forward split);
that the said  change(s) and  amendment has been  consented to and approved by a
majority vote of the  stockholders  holding at least a majority of each class of
stock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon."

   /s/ Nelson Vazquez                           /s/ Douglas Ansell
-------------------------                   -------------------------
Nelson Vazquez, President                   Douglas Ansell, Secretary

State Of Nevada     -
                    |     ss.               [NOTARIZED]
County Of Clark     -

      The  undersigned  Notary Public  certified  deposes and states that Nelson
Vazquez and Douglas  Ansell,  personally  appeared  before me and  executed  the
foregoing  on  behalf  of  the   Corporation  as  its  President  and  Secretary
respectively, this 24th day of January, 1997.


                                            By:   /s/ Bridget E. Richards
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Notary Public and for said
                                               County and State
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual Report of Millenium  Holding Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Richard Ham, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Richard Ham,
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 3, 2006
#### James Aiken v. State of Nebraska.

Filed June 26, 1894.

No. 6723.

1. Indictment and Information: Objections : Waiver. Objection to an indictment or information on the ground of duplicity must be made before verdict, or it will be held to -have been waived. '

*2642. -. Different criminal acts which constitute parts of the same transaction, such as burglary with intent to steal particular property, and larceny of the property described, may be charged in the same indictment or count thereof.

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Keysor, J.

*G. A. Rutherford*and *I). F. Osgood,*for plaintiff in error.

*George H. Hastings, Attorney General,*for the state.

Post, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of burglary by the judgment of the district court of Douglas county, and which he now seeks to reverse by means of a petition in error addressed to this court.

The first proposition argued is that the indictment is bad for duplicity. The charge of burglary, which is in the usual form, is followed by the further allegation that *“*the said James Aikin and * * * then and there being in said storehouse nineteen pieces of English worsted of the value of $27 5, and * * * the personal property of' said Soren Larsen, then and there being found in said storehouse, feloniously and burglariously did steal, take, and carry away.” To that contention a sufficient answer is that no objection was made to the indictment until after verdict. Where two or more distinct felonies, arising out of different transactions, are charged in the same indictment, the prosecutor will, on motion of the accused, be required to elect upon which charge he will proceed; but such objection must be made before trial and verdict, otherwise it will be waived. *(Thompson v. People, 4*Neb., 524.)

2. The indictment is, however, free from the vice imputed to it. Where different criminal acts constitute parts of the same transaction, they may be charged in the same-count. There are many illustrations of this rule, among. *265which are burglary and larceny. It is permissible to charge a burglary only, as that the accused broke and entered with intent to steal property, and also a larceny, as that he then and there stole the property described; and such an indictment will sustain a conviction for either of the crimes charged. (1 Bishop, Criminal Procedure, 423, 439; *Breese v. State,*12 O. St., 146; *State v. Brandon,*7 Kan., 106; *State v. Hayden,*45 Ia., 12; *State v. Brady,*14 Vt., 353; *Commonwealth v. Tuck,*20 Pick. [Mass.], 356; *Josslyn v. Commonwealth,*6 Met. [Mass.], 236.)

3. It is contended, also, that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction; but that contention is based upon the proposition that the jury should have accepted the testimony of the witnesses for the accused rather than of those for the state. It was for the jury to say which set of witnesses should be credited. There is no error in the record and the judgment is

Affirmed.
§ 403.4 Applications. [Rule 4] ( a ) Every proceeding before the Board shall be commenced by an application made to it, which shall be in writing and signed by, or on behalf of, the applicant.
( b ) An applicant shall file six copies of his application setting forth a clear and complete statement of the facts the grounds for the complaint, and the relief or remedy to which the applicant claims to be entitled.
( c ) Applicants resident in Canada shall file their complaints with the St. Lawrence Seaway Joint Tolls Reviews Board, Tower “A”, Place de Ville, 320 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario KIR 5A3. Applicants resident in the United States of America shall file their complaints with the St. Lawrence Seaway Joint Tolls Review Board, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, D.C. 20591. Other applicants may file their complaints with the Board at either address.
( d ) One copy of each application received shall be held and be available for public inspection at the offices of the Board in Ottawa, Ontario, and Massena, N.Y.
( e ) The Board shall publish notice of the receipt of applications in the “Canada Gazette” and the Federal Register.
( f ) Interested parties shall have thirty days from date of publication of notice in which to make representations or to submit briefs to the Board. [Rule 4]
(68 Stat. 92-97, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended; Agreement between the Governments of the United States and Canada finalized on March 20, 1978)
[24 FR 9307, Nov. 18, 1959; 24 FR 10445, Dec. 23, 1959, as amended at 43 FR 30539, July 17, 1978. Redesignated and amended at 47 FR 13805, Apr. 1, 1982]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4969

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance

Act to direct the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency

to develop a plan for stockpiling potassium iodide tablets in areas within

a 50-mile radius of a nuclear power plant.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 2000

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to direct the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to develop a plan

for stockpiling potassium iodide tablets in areas within

a 50-mile radius of a nuclear power plant.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STOCKPILING OF POTASSIUM IODIDE TABLETS.

4 Subtitle A of title VI of the Robert T. Stafford Dis5 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.

6 5196 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing:
2

•HR 4969 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 616. STOCKPILING OF POTASSIUM IODIDE TABLETS.

2 ‘‘(a) DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN.—The Director, jointly

3 with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and other appro4 priate Federal agencies, shall develop a plan for stock5 piling potassium iodide tablets in areas within a 50-mile

6 radius of a nuclear power plant.

7 ‘‘(b) CONTENTS.—The plan shall include a strategy

8 for the efficient storage and prompt delivery of potassium

9 iodide tablets to persons that may be affected by a disaster

10 at a nuclear power plant.

11 ‘‘(c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 1 year

12 after the date of enactment of this section, the Director

13 shall transmit the plan to Congress.

14 ‘‘(d) IMPLEMENTATION.—Following the 60-day pe15 riod beginning on the date of transmittal of the plan under

16 subsection (c), the Director shall begin implementation of

17 the plan.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AllianceGaming Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Saxton, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  February9, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Robert L. Saxton                                     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Saxton                                         |
| Executive Vice  President, Treasurer and Chief Financial |
| Officer (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)    |

 

----
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom 

Walton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 03/06/2011 06:32 PM 

Subject: Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52 -- Underlying Science 

Hi Bob, 

Attached you will find interagency comments on the underlying science in 

RIN 2060-AP52. There is a summary of interagency comments document, as 

well as redline on the RIA Chapter 5, preamble A&N finding (comments 

through page 274), the A&N Memorandum on Non-Hg Case Studies, and the A&N 

TSD. 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

Thanks! 

 

Cortney 

 

________________________________________________ 

Cortney Higgins 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, David A. Berg, ChiefExecutive Officer of American Crystal Sugar Company, (the “Company”), doeshereby certify that to his knowledge:

 

1.     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.     Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part ofthe Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hascaused this instrument to be executed this 14th day of January, 2009.

 
| By:                                           | /s/ DAVID A. BERG |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
| Name: David A. Berg                           |              |
| Title: President and Chief Executive  Officer |              |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



To the Board of Directors

Unity Wireless Corporation





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333  59674) on Form S-8 of Unity Wireless Corporation of our report dated February 25, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Unity Wireless Corporation as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-KSB of Unity Wireless Corporation.  Our report dated February 25, 2004 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and used cash in operating activities which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.





KPMG LLP (signed)





Chartered Accountants



Vancouver, Canada

March 26, 2004