alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      21





**Subsidiaries
      of**


**ADVANCED
      COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**


**at
      June 30, 2007**




**Encompass
      Group Affiliates, Inc.**


420
      Lexington Avenue


New
      York,
      NY 10170


EIN:
      20-1088535


State
      of
      Incorporation: Delaware





**Hudson
      Street Investments, LLC**


420
      Lexington Avenue


New
      York,
      NY 10170


EIN:
      54-2137152


State
      of
      Incorporation: Delaware





**Cyber-Test,
      Inc.**


448
      Commerce Way


Longwood,
      FL 32750


EIN:
      20-1106218


State
      of
      Incorporation: Delaware





**SpectruCell,
      Inc.**


420
      Lexington Avenue


New
      York,
      NY 10170


EIN:
      56-2425121


State
      of
      Incorporation: Delaware





**Vance
      Baldwin, Inc.**


7060
      State Road 84 #12


Fort
      Lauderdale, FL 33317


EIN:
      59-0718315


State
      of
      Incorporation: Florida
#### Joiner *v.*Stallings.

Submitted July 18,

Decided December 20, 1906.

Trover. Before Judge Burch. City court of Dublin. December 7, 1905.

*K. J. Hawkins,*for plaintiff. *J. S. Adams,*for defendant.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where an instrument to secure an indebtedness provided that the title to certain described horses should be and remain in the creditors until the note should be paid in full, and on this was indorsed a transfer in the following terms: “Eor value received we hereby sell, assign, and transfer to A. H. Joiner, together with all our rights, titles, liens, and interests thereto and therein, the within instrument, together with note attached thereto, without recourse,” this operated to pass the legal title to the horses, and not merely the title ánd interest which the creditors had in the instrument.

2. Under the ruling made in the foregoing note, the admission of the second transfer, distinctly specifying that the property also was intended to be conveyed, was immaterial.

3. The evidence was sufficient to make out a prima facie case, and the grant of a nonsuit was error.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit C

Statement of Claim

Plaintiff Shanice Legair

Unpaid Overtime Wages Weeks1

Average

Weekly 

Hours

Worked1

Payroll

Hourly

Rate1

Average

Weekly

Hourly

Pay1

Average

Weekly

Non-Hourly

Pay1

FLSA

Equivalent

Hourly Rate1

FLSA

Applicable

Overtime

Hourly Rate1

Total

Unpaid

Overtime

Wages1

Total

Liquidated

Damages1

12/26/21 - 7/15/22 28.86 40.9 $ 20.00 $ 741.75 $ 719.44 $ 37.59 $ 56.39 $1,464.41 $ 1,464.41

12/8/21 - 12/25/21 2.57 45 $ 20.00 $ 875.00 $ 795.00 $ 37.67 $ 56.50 $ 306.43 $ 306.43

10/15/21 - 12/7/21 7.71 49.25 $ 20.00 $ 995.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 40.30 $ 60.46 $1,360.87 $ 1,360.87

$3,131.71 $ 3,131.71

Total Unpaid Overtime Wages1 = $ 3,131.71

Total Liquidated Damages1 = $ 3,131.71

Total1 = $ 6,263.41

Period1

1 Numbers are averages, estimates, and/or approximates. Numbers may change as information is uncovered through the discovery

process.

Case 0:22-cv-61574-AHS Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2022 Page 1 of 1
§ 334.1175 Pacific Ocean, at Camp Rilea, Clatsop County, Oregon; danger zone. ( a ) *The danger zone.* The danger zone shall encompass all navigable waters of the United States, as defined at 33 CFR part 329, within an area bounded as follows: Beginning at latitude 46°09′00.32′′ N, longitude 123°57′52.57′′ W; thence to latitude 46°09′00.32′′ N, longitude 124°01′03.92′′ W; thence to latitude 46°05′25.38′′ N, longitude 124°01′03.92′′ W; thence to latitude 46°05′25.38′′ N, longitude 123°56′23.19′′ W. The datum for these coordinates is WGS84.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) No person or vessel shall enter or remain in the danger zone when restrictions are in force during weapons range training activities. At all other times, nothing in this regulation prohibits any lawful uses of this area.
( 2 ) A schedule for proposed closures of the danger zone will be furnished to the Coast Guard, Astoria Command Center one week in advance of range training activities to provide local notice to mariners. Changes to the schedule made less than one week in advance of the event will be transmitted to the Command Center on the day the change is made.
( 3 ) At least 30 minutes prior to restricting navigation in the danger zone, red flags will be raised on wooden poles immediately next to the beach at the north and south boundaries of Camp Rilea. The red flags will remain flying while the ranges are in use. During night weapons training activities, red lights will be substituted for the flags. Closure announcements will be broadcast over marine VHF Channel 16/19. When range training activities are completed, the red flags will be removed and an announcement made over marine VHF Channel 16/19 that restrictions are lifted.
( 4 ) When restrictions are in force, Camp Rilea will visually monitor the danger zone using radar and guards, equipped with binoculars and two-way radios, posted on the beach near the north and south boundaries of the Camp. If a vessel is detected in the danger zone, a cease fire will be called on all active weapons ranges and Camp Rilea will attempt to contact the vessel using marine VHF radio. Cease fire will be maintained until the vessel leaves the danger zone.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, Camp Rilea, Oregon and such agencies as he/she may designate.
[80 FR 9385, Feb. 23, 2015]
#### § 3.35-40 Sector Key West Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

Sector Key West's office is located in Key West, FL. The boundaries of Sector Key West's Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone start at the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 25°11′34′′ N, longitude 79°41′31′′ W, proceeding northeast to the Miami-Dade County, FL boundary at latitude 25°24′52′′ N, longitude 80°19′39′′ W; thence west along the southern boundary of Miami-Dade County to the western boundary at latitude 25°10′36′′ N, longitude 80°51′29′′ W; thence north along the western boundary of Miami-Dade County to the southern boundary of Collier County, FL; thence west along the southern boundary of Collier County to latitude 25°48′12′′ N, longitude 81°20′39′′ W; thence southwest to the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 24°18′57′′ N, longitude 84°50′48′′ W; thence east and then north along the outermost extent of the EEZ to the point of origin.

[USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36322, July 2, 2007]
/**
 * @file
 * JavaScript behaviors for options elements.
 */

(function ($, Drupal) {

  'use strict';

  /**
   * Attach handlers to options buttons element.
   *
   * @type {Drupal~behavior}
   */
  Drupal.behaviors.webformOptionsButtons = {
    attach: function (context) {
      // Place <input> inside of <label> before the label.
      $(context).find('label.webform-options-display-buttons-label > input[type="checkbox"], label.webform-options-display-buttons-label > input[type="radio"]').each(function () {
        var $input = $(this);
        var $label = $input.parent();
        $input.detach().insertBefore($label);
      });
    }
  };

})(jQuery, Drupal);
§ 127.1501 General. ( a ) The number, kind, and place of equipment for fire detection, protection, control, and extinguishment must be determined by an evaluation based upon sound principles of fire-protection engineering, analysis of local conditions, hazards within the waterfront facility handling LHG, and exposure to other property. A description of the number, kind, place, and use of fire equipment determined by this evaluation must appear in the Emergency Manual for each facility. The evaluation for each new facility and for all new construction on each facility must be submitted to the COTP for review when the emergency manual is submitted under § 127.1307.
( b ) All fire equipment for each facility must be adequately maintained, and periodically inspected and tested, so it will perform as intended.
( c ) The following must be red or some other conspicuous color and be in places that are readily accessible: ( 1 ) Hydrants and standpipes.
( 2 ) Hose stations.
( 3 ) Portable fire extinguishers.
( 4 ) Fire monitors.
( d ) Fire equipment must bear the approval, if applicable, of Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Factory Mutual Research Corporation, or other independent laboratory recognized by NFPA.
[CGD 88-049, 60 FR 39796, Aug. 3, 1995, as amended by USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34714, June 29, 1999; USCG-2019-0444, 87 FR 5691, Feb. 2, 2022]
#### THE PEOPLE ex rel. ARTHUR RUSSELL, Appellant, v. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF QUEENS COUNTY, Respondents.

*Newtown week— Chap.*540 *of*1868 *—power of board of supervisors undw.*

Under the provisions of chapter 540 of 1868, authorizing the supervisors of New-town and the Seventeenth ward of the city of Brooklyn to take charge of the bridge over Newtown creek, keep the same in repair, “ and appoint a proper person to attend and manage the draw in the bridge,” the power of the supervisors is exhausted by the appointment of a person to attend and manage the draw, and they have no authority to appoint an assistant keeper; and a person employed as an assistant, is a mere employe of the keeper and may he discharged by him.

*305Appeal from an order, denying an application for a mandamus to compel tlie defendant to audit and allow the claim of the relator, for eight months’ wages, as assistant in attending the draw in the bridge over Newtown creek.

*¡S..P. Noble,*for relator. *And. J. Provost,*for respondent.

Opinion by

Talcott, J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Tappen and Talcott, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1102
CHARLES W. PARKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Food and Drug Division, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-92-269-5-H) Submitted: April 23, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996 Before HALL, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles W. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Giles Meacham, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Appellee's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parker v. North Carolina Dep't of Agric. , No. CA-92-269-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Richard B. Abshire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 /s/ Richard B. Abshire
 Richard B. Abshire
 Chief Financial Officer
 November 11, 2004
  --
§ 327.10 Authority of the presiding officer. Presiding officers shall have the following authority: ( a ) To regulate the course of the hearing including the order of all sessions and the scheduling thereof, after any initial session, and the recessing, reconvening, and adjournment thereof; and
( b ) To take any other action necessary or appropriate to the discharge of the duties vested in them, consistent with the statutory or other authority under which the Chief of Engineers functions, and with the policies and directives of the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army.
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Advaxis, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on
Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:



(1)
the Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date:
    January 21, 2020 | By:    | /s/
    Molly Henderson                              
|-------------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|                           | Name:  | Molly
    Henderson                                  
|                           | Title: | Chief
    Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 14, 2021 No. 04-21-00528-CV INTEREST OF G.K.B., JR. From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA00020 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2. The reporter’s record was due on November 29, 2021, but has not been filed. We therefore ORDER Elva Chapa, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record, to file the reporter’s record on or before December 27, 2021
. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of December, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### § 401.77 [Reserved]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00738

- CV

IN RE Richard RODRIGUEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 5, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 1, 2012, Relator Richard Rodriguez filed a petition for writ of mandamus.

On November 19, 2012, the real party in interest filed a response. After review of the appellate

record, the petition, and the response, this court has determined that Relator Rodriguez is not

entitled to the relief sought. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

52.3; 52.7 ; 5 2.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11

- 04

- 00096

- CVK, styled Richard Rodriguez v. Camino Agave, Inc.

, pending in the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas, the Honorable Donna S. Rayes presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                    35,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  187,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,392
<INVENTORY>                                    146,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               537,782
<PP&E>                                         505,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                 293,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,342,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          476,102
<BONDS>                                        588,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,720
<COMMON>                                         2,616
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,342,895
<SALES>                                        314,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               337,577
<CGS>                                          299,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  311,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,371
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,078)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       28,956
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### Walser, John From: Sent: 

### To: Subject: Attachments:

John, Amy Muttoni <amy.muttoni@tceq.texas.gov> Wednesday, January 22, 2014 2:18PM Walser, John DPS Rules needed for 

### 1/M SIP approval DpsRules_30TexReg3432_2005-Jun-1O_issue-061 Ois-37Tac23.93ado-2Epa-fnl.pdf; DpsRules_30TexReg1597 _2005-Mar-18_issue-0318is-37Tac23.93pro-2Epa-fnl.pdf; DpsRules_27TexReg277_2002-Jan-4_issue-0104is-37Tac23.93ado-2Epa-fnl.pdf

Attached are the DPS rules that were in effect on 1/1/2003 and the rule changes that have taken place since then. The rules dated 1/4/2002were in effect on 1/1/2003, and these should have been submitted with the 2005 1/M SIP revision, appendix 

### I. Please let me know ifany other information is needed. Thank you, Amy Muttoni Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Mobile Source ProgramsTeam, MC-206 Phone: (512) 239-6351 Fax: (512) 239-5687 Amy.Muttoni@tceq.texas.gov

1
# oRICINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE THE PETITION OF MARK J. HARTWIG PR 20-0004 

# FILED APR 14 2020 Bowen Greenwood Olen< of

e Supren-i

tene e Court OR8tR

of n/Inn

Mark J. Hartwig has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in the State Bar ofMontana after having been on inactive status since May 2017. IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of Montana,Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice oflaw in the state ofMontana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within six months of the date of this Order, Petitioner shall submit to the Board ofContinuing Legal Education,P.O. Box 577,Helena, MT 59624,proofofattendance at thirty hours ofapproved Continuing Legal Education to be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive status. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this

\ LA day ofApril, 2020. For the Court,

ChiefJustice 04/14/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0004
ADR LUNCHTIME SERIES PRESENTATION

What is ADR’s Crucial Role in Addressing 

Harassment in the Workplace?

Nearly half of all American workers have been affected by workplace bullying 

and harassment, either as a target or as a witness to abusive behavior against a 

co-worker. Unaddressed incivility and microaggressions, as well as unresolved 

conflicts involving bullying and harassment among co-workers, can have 

enormous costs to both the organization and its employees. ADR professionals 

are uniquely positioned to address matters involving workplace respect at the 

individual and systemic level. Come discover the various roles ADR can play in 

supporting a safe and respectful workplace.

Speaker: Geetha Ravindra, JD

Presented by the Interagency ADR Working Group, Workplace Conflict 

Management Section in coordination with the Department of Energy’s 

Alternative Dispute Resolution Office.

Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Time: Noon - 1:30 pm EDT (Please allow extra time for security procedures)

Location: U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave, SW, Room GE-086

(DOE Forrestal Main Auditorium)

Washington, D.C. 20585

Travel by Metro: Green and Yellow Line - L'Enfant Plaza station (exit to 

Maryland Avenue) OR Orange and Blue Line - Smithsonian station (exit to 

Holocaust Museum/Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

If you plan to attend in person and you need any special accommodations, or if you plan to attend this 

training online and you need any special accommodations, please contact cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov

no later than January 2, 2019. 

To attend in person, everyone, including federal employees with an HSPD-12 government ID badge, 

must register by email to cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov and provide 1) name, 2) citizenship, and 3) 

agency/employer by January 16, 2019. You do not need to register to call-in or participate online. 

To attend via WebEx, click here for a direct link. You may also go to http://doe.webex.com, enter the 

Meeting Number 906 105 806, and click “Join.” The event password is Adr1234. Follow instructions 

for the audio (select the “I will call in” option for better reception). 

To listen only via teleconference, please call 1-415-527-5035 and use access code: 906 105 806. Please

disregard the prompt for an Attendee ID by pressing # sign. To submit questions to the speaker during 

the program, please use WebEx chat or email elisabeth.bissell@fema.dhs.gov. Materials for this 

presentation will be posted at http://www.adr.gov/events.html several days before the program.
§ 20.710 Proposed findings, closing arguments, and briefs. ( a ) Before the ALJ closes the hearing, he or she may hear oral argument so far as he or she deems appropriate.
( b ) Before the ALJ decides the case, and upon terms he or she finds reasonable, any party may file a brief, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, or both. Any party may waive this right. If all parties waive it, then the ALJ may issue an oral order at the close of the hearing.
( c ) Any oral argument, brief, or proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law form part of the record of the proceeding, as described in § 20.903.