alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Form 10-Q for September 30, 1995, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000086940
<NAME> SAVANNAH ELECTRIC AND POWER CO
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      435,973
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,788
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          52,078
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        42,152
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 531,991
<COMMON>                                        54,223
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        8,688
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            105,211
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 168,122
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     35,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           134,699
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       20,000
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  (1,200)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        934
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 (842)
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 175,278
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  531,991
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      177,865
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            15,246
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     129,793
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     145,039
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         32,826
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  14
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  32,840
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         9,943
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,897
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,743
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   21,154
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        13,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          43,567
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### GEORGE P. KIRK, Respondent, *v.*H. WILSON BLASHFIELD, Appellant.

*Judgment in Justices Oourt dismissing action on the ground of a, want of*jurisdiction— *Bes adjudicata—costs in such case on recovery of less than fifty dollars in action in Supreme Oourt.*

Appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court, entered in favor of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff commenced an action in a Justice’s Court. The defendant objected to the jurisdiction, on the ground that the accounts between the parties exceeded $400. The justice, after first overruling the objection, finally dismissed the' action upon that same ground. The plaintiff then sued in this court and recovered $38.50. On a motion at Special Term he was allowed costs.

It was admitted that the justice was in error in his decision, but no appeal was taken from it. The General Term *held,*that if an appeal had been taken, and thereupon the same decision had been made in this court, that the matter would have been *res adjudicata ;*and that as the plaintiff rested satisfied with the decision which was made by the justice, and as that was made on the defendant’s objection, it must be taken as the settled rule of this present case.

The court also examined the question raised as to this order, and *held,*that as a matter of practice the defendant should have appealed from the order of the Special Term granting the- plaintiff costs, and not from the judgment; and that this case should not be considered a precedent as to the manner of reviewing such orders.

*A. J. Parker*and *O. Porter,*for the appellant.

*B. A. Benedict,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Learned, P. J.

Present—Learned, P. J., Boardman and James, JJ.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1421]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussion could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: January 20, 2000.
    Time: 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: 6700-B Rockledge Drive, Rm. 2155, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Yen Li, Scientific Review Administrator, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID, 
NIH, Room 2217, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7610, 301 496-2550, [email protected].
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transportation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1421 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aceto Corporation, a New
York corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Leonard S. Schwartz, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



/S/ Leonard S. Schwartz
--------------------------
Leonard S. Schwartz
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
May 8, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30604 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. LEONARD LYLE FONTENOT Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:04-CR-20059-7 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Leonard Lyle Fontenot was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess cocaine base, methylenedioxy amphetamine (ecstasy), and marijuana with intent todistribute (Count One), and one count ofpossession ofcocaine basewith intent to distribute (Count Five). He appeals the mandatory life sentence imposed as to Count One on the basis that it violated his Sixth Amendment right to have a jury determine the facts ofhis prior drug convictions. As Fontenot concedes, his argument is foreclosed. See Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000); United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 22, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-30604

2 United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007), c ert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0528 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-068-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model MBB-BK117 C-2 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 104 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to replace any affected GCUs to prevent a short 

circuit, which could result in a loss of electrical generating power, loss of systems required for 

continued safe flight and landing, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $7,130

Labor per Helicopter

(2 x $85/work-hour for the 

replacement)

$170

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $7,300

Total US Fleet Cost $

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: George Schwab
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.410 What are the conditions for conducting site evaluation and pre-construction testing? ( a ) No person may conduct site evaluation and pre-construction testing unless it complies with this subpart and other applicable laws.
( b ) Measures must be taken to prevent or minimize the effect of activities under § 148.400(a) of this part.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39177, July 1, 2013]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT C OUR T

SO UTH ERN DISTRICT OF FLO RIDA

CA SE N O .

In the M atler of the Search of

M ar-a-Lago

1100 S. Ocean Blvd.

Palm B each, FL 33480

O RDER G M N TIN G M O TION TO APPEAR

PROH AC VIC TF CONSENT TO DESIGNATION AND REQUEST TO

ELECTRO NICA LLY RECEW E NO TICES O F ELECTR ON IC FILIN G

X'H IS CAU SE having com e before the Cotu't on the M otion to Appear Pro H ac Vice for

James M . Trusty, onsent to es gn , d D i ation and Request to Electronically Re'ceive Notices of

Electronic Filing (the çtlklotion'), pursuant to the Rules Goveming the Admission, Practice, Peer

Review, and Discipline of Atlorneys in the United States D istrict Court for the Southern District

of Florida and Section 28 of the CM /ECF Administrative Procedttres. This Court having

considered the motion and a11 other relevant factors, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

The Moéon is YRANTED. James M. Trusty may appear and pe cipate inthis acéon on

behalf of M ovant Donald J. Tnlm p. The Clerk shall provide electronic notifcation of a11 electronic

filings to James M . Trusty, atjtrlzsty@ifrahlaw.com.

D ON E AN D ORDERED in Cham bers at . Floridw this

day of - 2022.

United States District Judge

Copies furnished to: Al1 Counsel of Record

22-cv-81294-AMC

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 6-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/22/2022 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 476 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 476

 To prescribe alternative payment mechanisms for the payment of annual 
  enrollment fees for the TRICARE program of the military health care 
                                system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1999

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prescribe alternative payment mechanisms for the payment of annual 
  enrollment fees for the TRICARE program of the military health care 
                                system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT MECHANISMS FOR TRICARE ENROLLMENT FEES.

    (a) Monthly Payment Option.--The Secretary of Defense shall permit 
persons who enroll in the managed health care program of the uniformed 
services known as the TRICARE program to pay their annual enrollment 
fees on a monthly basis.
    (b) Alternative Payment Mechanisms.--In addition to existing 
methods by which an enrollee in the TRICARE program may pay enrollment 
fees, the Secretary of Defense shall establish mechanisms to provide 
for payment of enrollment fees using--
            (1) a deduction from military retired or retainer pay (or 
        equivalent pay), in the case of a member or former member of 
        the uniformed services entitled to such pay who is an enrollee;
            (2) a deduction from monthly benefits under section 202 or 
        223 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402, 423), in the 
        case of a person entitled to such benefits who is an enrollee; 
        and
            (3) an electronic funds transfer from a checking or savings 
        account designated by the enrollee.
    (c) Coordination of Deduction With Other Agencies.--The Secretary 
of Defense shall enter into an agreement with the Commissioner of 
Social Security and the Secretary of the Treasury to conduct the 
deduction mechanism authorized by subsection (b)(2) in the same manner 
as provided in section 1840(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395s(a)) for the monthly deduction of premiums for the medicare 
program.
    (d) TRICARE Program Defined.--For purposes of this section, the 
term ``TRICARE program'' means the managed health care program that is 
established by the Secretary of Defense under the authority of chapter 
55 of title 10, United States Code, principally section 1097 of such 
title, and includes the competitive selection of contractors to 
financially underwrite the delivery of health care services under the 
Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-54378 and 333-128232 on Forms S-8 and Registration StatementNos. 333-101957 and 333-128231 on Forms S-3 of our reports dated March 16, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries and management’s report onthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Certified Public Accountants 

 

Orlando, Florida

March 16, 2006
§ 334.240 Potomac River, Mattawoman Creek and Chicamuxen Creek; U.S. Naval Surface Weapons Center, Indian Head Division, Indian Head, Md. ( a ) *The danger zone.* Beginning at a point on the easterly shore of the Potomac River at latitude 38°36′00′′, longitude 77°11′00′′; thence to latitude 38°34′30′′; longitude 77°13′00′′; thence to latitude 38°33′20′′, longitude 77°14′20′′; thence to latitude 38°32′20′′, longitude 77°15′10′′; thence to latitude 38°32′00′′, longitude 77°15′00′′; thence to latitude 38°32′30′′, longitude 77°14′00′′; thence to latitude 38°32′30′′, longitude 77°14′00′′; thence upstream along the easterly shoreline of Chicamuxen Creek to its head thence downstream along the westerly shoreline of Chicamuxen Creek to the southernmost point of Stump Neck; thence northeasterly along the shoreline of Stump Neck to the mouth of Mattawoman Creek; thence along the southeasterly shore of Mattawoman Creek to the pilings remaining from the footbridge connecting the left bank of the creek to the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division; thence along the northwesterly shore of Mattawoman Creek from the pilings remaining from the footbridge to the mouth of the creek; thence in a northeasterly direction along the easterly shore of the Potomac River to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Firings consisting of controlled explosions within the danger zone, and controlled shore operations, or accidental explosions, hazardous to vessel traffic within the limits of the danger zone, may take place at any time of the day or night and on any day of the week.
( 2 ) Flashing red lights, horns, and signs established at appropriate points will warn vessels of impending tests or operations considered to be hazardous to vessels within the danger zone.
( 3 ) No persons or vessels except vessels of the United States or vessels authorized by the enforcing agency shall enter or remain in the danger zone while lights are flashing, when warning horns are in operation, or when warned or directed by a patrol vessel.
( 4 ) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the use of Mattawoman Creek or Chicamuxen Creek as a harbor of refuge because of stress of weather.
( 5 ) Except as prescribed in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, persons and vessels may enter and proceed through the danger zone without restriction. However, accidental explosions may occur at any time and persons and vessels entering the area do so at their own risk.
( 6 ) Fishermen operating in the danger zone when warning signals are sounded shall evacuate the area immediately.
( 7 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division, Indian Head, Maryland.
[26 FR 9748, Oct. 17, 1961, as amended at 48 FR 54598, Dec. 6, 1983. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17552, Apr. 10, 1997]
AGENDA

RAISE Family Caregiving Advisory Council

January 19, 2021; 12:30–4:30 pm, Eastern Time

12:30–12:45 Call to Order

Administrator and Assistant Secretary for Aging

Administration for Community Living

Roll Call

12:45–1:00 Agenda Overview and Updates

Greg Link

Director, Office of Supportive and Caregiver Services

Administration for Community Living

1:00 – 1:30 Medicaid Supports for Family Caregivers

Kitty Purington

Senior Program Director

National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP)

1:30 – 2:15 Listening Sessions Presentation

Eileen Tell

CEO, ET Consulting 

Fellow, LTSS LeadingAge Center at UMass Boston

2:15 – 2:30 Break

2:30 – 3:25 Overview & Discussion: Inventory of Federal Programs and Initiatives to 

Support Family Caregivers

Sarah Markel

Greg Link

3:25 – 4:15 Initial Report to Congress: Overview of Council Review Process

Greg Link

Sarah Markel

4:15 – 4:30 Wrap-up and next steps
FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT HCIRCUIT
ST E V E N PE L E SASA FUE ,

Pe t i tione r-Appe lla

nt,
v. M ART IN B IT E R , W arde n,

R e sponde nt-Appe lle e . No. 12-55307 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-02436-DM G-M R W C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia , Los Ange le s O R DE R
T H O M A S , C hie f Judge : Upon thevote of a

m a jority of nonre c use d

a c tive judge s, it is ordere d tha t this c a s e be re he ard e n ba n c pursua nt to Fe de ra l R

ule of Appe lla

te Proc e dure 35(a )
and C irc u it R

ule 35-3. Thethre e -judge pa ne l opinion sha

ll not be c ite d a s pre c e de nt by

or to a ny c ourt of theNinth C irc uit. 

# FIL ED AUG 04 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS
§ 162.240 Tongass Narrows, Alaska; navigation. ( a ) *Definitions.* The term “Tongass Narrows” includes the body of water lying between Revillagigedo Channel and Guard Island in Clarence Strait.
( b ) No vessel, except for public law enforcement and emergency response vessels, floatplanes during landings and take-offs, and vessels of 23 feet registered length or less, shall exceed a speed of 7 knots in the region of Tongass Narrows bounded to the north by Tongass Narrows Buoy 9 and to the south by Tongass Narrows East Channel Regulatory marker at position 55°19′22.0′′ N, 131°36′40.5′′ W and Tongass Narrows West Channel Regulatory marker at position 55°19′28.5′′ N, 131°39′09.7′′ W, respectively.
( c ) No vessel shall while moored or at anchor, or by slow passage or otherwise while underway, unreasonably obstruct the free passage and progress of other vessels.
( d ) No vessel shall moor or anchor to any structure of the United States other than mooring piers, wharves, and floats without the consent of the Commander, Sector Southeast Alaska.
[CGD 75-082, 42 FR 51759, Sept. 29, 1977] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 162.240, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*