alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Denny W. Nestripke  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of Merilus,  Inc. on Form 10KSB for the Annual period ended  December 31,
2004:

1)   Fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2)   The  information  contained  in such  Form  10KSB  fairly  presents  in all
     material  respects the  financial  condition  and results of  operations of
     Merilus, Inc.

By:  /s/ Denny W. Nestripke
   ------------------------------
Name: Denny W. Nestripke
Title:   Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.02

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Denny W. Nestripke,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of Merilus,  Inc. on Form 10KSB for the Annual period ended  December 31,
2004:

1)   Fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2)   The  information  contained  in such  Form  10KSB  fairly  presents  in all
     material  respects the  financial  condition  and results of  operations of
     Merilus, Inc.

By:  /s/ Denny W. Nestripke
   -----------------------------
Name: Denny W. Nestripke
Title:   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
-cr-06239-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2000 P
-cr-06239-WPD Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2000 P
01-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
01-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
01-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
01-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
01-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
01-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
01-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
01-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
01-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
1-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
1-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page 
1-cv-07413-WDF Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/28/2001 Page
#### § 401.33 Special instructions.

No vessel of unusual design, vessel, or part of a vessel under tow, or vessel whose dimensions exceed the maximum vessel dimensions § 401.3 shall transit the Seaway except in accordance with special instructions of the Corporation or the Manager given on the application of the representative of the vessel.

[65 FR 52914, Aug. 31, 2000]
Page 1 of 3

CLARKE SILVERGLATE, P.A. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

RUBEN BELLO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC., 

A Florida Company, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 22-cv-23005-DPG 

DHL’S NOTICE OF SERVING EXPERT DISCLOSURE 

Defendant, DHL Express (USA), Inc., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) and the Court’s 

Scheduling Order Setting Civil Trial Date and Pretrial Schedule, Requiring Mediation, and 

Referring Certain Motions to Magistrate Judge [D.E. 10], hereby provides notice that it has 

retained the following expert: 

1. Allen Singer, MD 

Specialty: Psychiatry 

7800 Red Road, Ste. 200 

Miami, FL 33143 

Contemporaneously with filing this Notice, undersigned has served Plaintiff’s counsel with 

all documents and information required by Rule 26(a)(2), including Dr. Singer’s report containing 

a full discussion of his Rule 35 examination of Plaintiff and his opinions in this action, all 

documents Dr. Singer reviewed in arriving at his opinions, Dr. Singer’s CV, and his testimony list. 

If requested, undersigned will make Dr. Singer available for deposition during the expert discovery 

period. 

Dated: April 7, 2023 

Case 1:22-cv-23005-DPG Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

CLARKE SILVERGLATE, P.A. 

Respectfully submitted, 

CLARKE SILVERGLATE, P.A. 

5301 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 900 

Miami, FL 33126 

Telephone: (305) 377-0700 

Facsimile: (305) 377-3001 

By: /s/ Craig Salner 

 Craig Salner 

 Florida Bar No. 669695 

csalner@cspalaw.com

smunguia@cspalaw.com

socd@cspalaw.com

 Maria J. Londono, Esq. 

 Florida Bar No. 1011034 

mlondono@cspalaw.com

jsantana@cspalaw.com

Counsel for Defendant 

Case 1:22-cv-23005-DPG Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

CLARKE SILVERGLATE, P.A. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was 

electronically filed on April 7, 2023, with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which 

will send e-filing notices to all counsel of record listed below: 

Henry Hernandez, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 542601 

henry@hhlawflorida.com

GARCIA HERNANDEZ, P.A. 

2655 S. LeJeune Road, Suite 802 

Coral Gables, Florida 33134 

T: (305) 771-3374 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Monica Espino, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 834491 

me@espino-law.com

Espino Law, PL 

2250 SW 3rd Ave, Ste. 400 

Miami, FL 33129 

T: (305) 704-3172 

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 

CLARKE SILVERGLATE, P.A. 

By: /s/ Craig Salner

Craig Salner 

Case 1:22-cv-23005-DPG Document 26 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023 Page 3 of 3
#### § 49.05-10 Affidavits required.

The trustee or trustees appointed to receive moneys due incompetent personnel shall, prior to the payment of any such moneys, execute and file with the Commandant an affidavit or affidavits saying and deposing that any moneys henceforth received by virtue of such appointment shall be applied solely to the use and benefit of the incompetent and that no fee, commission, or charge shall be demanded, or in any manner accepted, for any service or services rendered in connection with such appointment as trustee or trustees.
#### § 402.1 Purpose.

This regulation prescribes the charges to be assessed for the full or partial transit of the St. Lawrence Seaway between Montreal, Quebec, and Lake Erie.
**Giving to the Next Generation**

From self-expression to self-direction, there are countless ways for older adults to stay engaged and give back to others at the same time. Some of the most rewarding ways to express yourself and contribute to your community involve passing on experiences, wisdom, and skills to the generations that follow. 

*Everyone*has something to share, and these ideas can help get you started.

**Mentor.** Use professional or personal experiences to guide a child, young adult, or even a peer. Example: Visit Senior Corps at nationalservice.gov to learn about becoming a foster grandparent.

**Volunteer.** Put skills to use while giving back to your community.

Example: Sign up to collect food/clothing donations, serve meals at a local soup kitchen, or help older friends with daily tasks at home such as paying bills. 

**Teach.** Impart expertise via formal or informal education and tutoring opportunities. 

Example: Check with local schools that may need reading, math, or science tutors.

**Speak.** Sign up for speaking engagements, paid or unpaid, as well as storytelling events.

Example: Open-mic events, often at theaters and libraries, welcome speakers of all ages.

**Engage.** Visit a senior center or organize a gathering focused on connecting with others.

Example: Book clubs attract participants of all ages and encourage the exchange of ideas.

**Write.** Pen an article, op-ed, or even a book to communicate wisdom and lessons learned. Example: Start with something you know the most about, such as a career, hobby, or historical event, and submit a column to your local newspaper.

**Create.** Pick a medium and use art to express yourself and share your perspective. 

Example: Paint, draw, sculpt, play music, dance, make crafts – whatever suits you.

Looking for more ideas? Each May, the Administration for Community Living leads Older Americans Month, a national observance focused on community engagement and other issues important to older adults. Visit https://oam.acl.gov/ any time for resources and inspiration.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0528 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 068 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model MBB - BK117 C - 2 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 104 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to replace any affected GCUs to prevent a short circuit, which could result in a loss of electrical generating power, loss of systems required for continued safe flight and landing, and subsequent l oss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 7,130 Labor per Helicopter ( 2 x $ 8 5 /work- hour for the replacement) $ 170 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 7,300 Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD b e considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Isthe AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : George Schwab
#### David Furbush, appellee, v. Hiram H. Barker et al., appellants.

Filed April 17, 1894.

No. 4542.

Stare Decisis. The conclusion and decision announced on a former hearing of this case (38 Neb., 1) are approved and adhered to.

Rehearing of case reported in 38 Neb., 1.

*Wall & Bradley*and *Abbott & Caldwell,*for appellants.

*Calkins & Pratt*and *Nightingale Bros., contra,*

Harrison, J.

This case was appealed to this court from the district court of Sherman county, and in an opinion written by Ryan, C., filed here October 17, 1893 (38 Neb., 1), the judgment of the district court was reversed and a decree ordered in this court for certain defendants. Appellee filed a motion for a rehearing, which was granted, and on the rehearing additional briefs were filed and further oral arguments heard. In the former opinion a very extended *130statement of the issues presented by the pleadings was made and the evidence examined and reviewed in a very complete manner. We hav'e carefully read and considered the testimony and pleadings in the case, together with the briefs filed on rehearing, as well as those filed at the original hearing and argument of the case in this court, and are fully satisfied that the former conclusion reached was correct and the decision announced right. The case was so thoroughly examined, and argued at such length in the prior opinion, that we deem it unnecessary to discuss it further here, but will content ourselves with saying that the former decision is approved and adhered to and decree ordered as therein stated.

Order accordingly.
§ 25.409 Appeal. ( a ) A claimant may submit an appeal, in writing, through the settlement authority disapproving the claim or approving the claim in part. ( 1 ) The appeal shall set forth fully the legal or factual bases asserted as grounds for the appeal; and
( 2 ) The appeal is permitted only if it is postmarked within 45 days after receipt of ( i ) notice of disapproval of the claim or
( ii ) offer of settlement in a reduced amount.
( b ) The disapproval of a claim is final unless the claimant submits a request for reconsideration or an appeal in writing.
( c ) Upon receipt of an appeal, the settlement authority examines it and forwards it with the claim file, opinions, and recommendations to the next higher settlement authority.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 31, 2018

Order 

Clerk

August 31, 2018

156430(62)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 156430

v COA: 331602

Wayne CC: 13-000575-FC

KELLI MARIE WORTH-McBRIDE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to extend the time for filing the plaintiffappellee’s supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as 

timely filed if submitted on or before September 27, 2018.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 4

    To declare it to be the policy of the United States to deploy a 
                       national missile defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1999

 Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Spratt, Mr. Bliley, Mr. 
   Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Hilleary, Mr. Hefley, Mrs. 
 Fowler, Ms. Granger, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Snyder, 
  Mr. Sisisky, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. 
 Armey, Mr. Turner, Mr. Murtha, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Hoyer, 
Mr. Ryun of Kansas, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Taylor of 
Mississippi, Mr. Andrews, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Blagojevich, Mr. Cox, 
 Mr. Dicks, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. 
     Underwood, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. English, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. 
   Abercrombie, Mr. Everett, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Bateman, Mr. Reyes, Mr. 
 Pickett, Mr. Gibbons, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Schaffer, Mr. 
  Stenholm, Mr. Condit, Mr. Lewis of California, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. 
Edwards, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Spence, Mr. Maloney of Connecticut, Mr. Scott, 
Mr. Goode, Mr. Berry, and Mr. Hill of Indiana) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in 
 addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To declare it to be the policy of the United States to deploy a 
                       national missile defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That it is the policy 
of the United States to deploy a national missile defense.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-80144-CR-Smith/Maynard(s)(s)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOFF STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT,

Defendant.

GOVERNMENT’S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RE ADMITTED EVIDENCE

I, Marc Osborne, as counsel for the plaintiff, the United States, hereby certify as follows.

 ALL EXHIBITS E-FILED: All documentary exhibits and photographs of non-documentary 

physical exhibits admitted into evidence have been electronically filed in CM/ECF.

Any original exhibits that have been returned to or retained by the filing party after electronic 

filing shall be kept for safe keeping until the conclusion of any appeals. Upon order of court, the 

filing party agrees to return the original exhibits to the Clerk of Court.

MARKENZY LAPOINTE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: s/ Marc Osborne

Assistant United States Attorney

Court ID# A5500796

500 S. Australian Avenue, Suite 400

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Tel: (561) 209-1014

marc.osborne@usdoj.gov

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 206 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)Site Related EnvironmentalAssessment Program3M and Dyneon LLCDecatur, AlabamaRaw Data Appendices: July 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011Quarterly Status ReportGLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 15GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 18GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 19GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 20GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 15GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 18GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 19GLP10-01-01 INTERIM REPORT 20Raw DataAppendices:July 1, 2011 toSeptember 30, 2011Quarterly StatusReport11P-0094-v3-13M CompanySt. Paul, Minnesota3M CompanySt. Paul, Minnesota 

# Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)

Site Related Environmental

Assessment Program

3M and Dyneon LLC

Decatur, Alabama®®
#### HENRY L. ROGERS, Respondent, *v.*JOHN P. GOULD, Appellant.

*Contract for pv/rchase of stock*— statute *of frauds*— *duty of broleer.*

One who gives a verbal order to his broker to purchase certain stock, in pursuance of which the broker purchases the stock, and the same is on the following day-delivered to and paid for by him, cannot insist that the contract is void, on the ground that no part of the stock was delivered and no money paid at the time of giving the order. The delivery by the seller, and the acceptance by the broker, acting as the agent of the buyer, renders the contract valid and binding.

The obligation of a stock broker,.who has purchased stock for a customer, is to keep at all times on hand or under his control ready for delivery to his cuS' tomer, upon his paying the sum due him thereon, either the particular shares purchased, or an equal amount of other shares of the same kind. *(Horton*v. *Morgan,*19 2ST. Y., 170; *Stewart*v. *Drake,*46 id., 449; *Bourse*v. *Prime,*4 Johns. Oh., 490; S. 0., 7 id., 69; *Tmssig*v. *Hart,*58 N. Y., 435.)

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

*Nelson*Smith, for appellant. *Wm. Henry*Anthon, for respondent.

Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Beady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.
#### WILLIAM G. BUTLER, Respondent, *v.*THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, Appellant.

*Chap.*262 *of 1859—presentation of claim to common council—when a compliance with requirements*cf— *costs.*

A presentation of a claim against a municipal corporation to the common council thereof, is a sufficient compliance with chapter 262 of 1859, especially when *322the corporate powers - are so distributed that the officer, who, from his duties, might be assumed to be the chief fiscal officer of the corporation, has no power to pay the claim if presented to him. ' - ® ;

This is an appeal by defendant from an order made by Judge Dwight at the Monroe Special Term, denying a motion for retaxation of costs.

The defendant claimed that the demand upon which the above suit was brought, should have been presented to the city .treasurer for payment before suit brought.

The plaintiff claims that a presentation of the demand to the common council of defendant was proper, and that it was not necessary to present it to the city treasurer. The referee fora that the demand was presented to the common council of defenda: before suit brought and was refused.

*James Break*Perkins, for the appellant.

*John W. Kelly,*for the respondent.

Gilbert, J.:

The intention of the legislature in enacting the statute, ehapt 262 of 1859, is manifest. It was to prevent the recovery of coe against municipal corporations, in cases where the creditor had n afforded the corporation an opportunity to pay before bringing I: action. That opportunity was given in this case. The claim w presented to the common council, who alone could authorize i payment, and it was rejected. The treasurer is a subordina officer. The relation between him and "the common council, matters of this kind, resembles that of an agent to his princip: and a presentation to the higher authority is equivalent to one the lesser. The presentation of the claim to the treasurer, after t' common council had refused to pay it, would have been an id ceremony. The statute does not require a supererogatory act. 1 treasurer was the chief fiscal officer, he was not authorized to ps He was not therefore the officer whom the statute, upon a fair co struction, designated. For, when the corporate powers have be so distributed that the officer who, from his duties, might language is, that the claim must be presented/^ *payment.*If t *323regarded as the chief fiscal officer, has no authority to pay a creditor when his claim is presented, he is not such an officer within the meaning of the statute.*

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Present — Mullin, P. J., Smith and Gilbert, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

*

 McClure v. Supervisors, 50 Barb., 594; S. C. in Court of Appeals, 4 Abb. (N. S.), 202.
Jump to main content.

Risk-Screening Environmental Indicators (RSEI)

Contact Us**Search:**All EPARSEI

    - You are here:  EPA Home
    - Prevention, Pesticides & Toxic Substances
    - Pollution Prevention and Toxics
    - RSEI

----

# 

##### Highlights

Learn How to Use—and Not Use—RSEI

Get RSEI Version 2.2.0

The Risk-Screening Environmental  Indicators (RSEI) is a computer-based screening tool developed by EPA that analyzes  risk factors to put Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) release data into a chronic health context. RSEI is often used by government  regulators, communities, journalists, industry and others to: 
    - Examine trends. 
    - Identify important emissions situations for  follow-up. 
    - Support community-based projects. 
    - Initially screen potential impacts of emissions. 

Use this site to find: 
    - Basic       Information  - Read more about what RSEI can do and how it is used.
    - Technical Information  - Important       characteristics of the model, tutorials. 
    - How to Use—and Not Use—RSEI  - Important tips on using RSEI appropriately. 
    - Get RSEI  – How       to obtain the current version of RSEI and recommended patches. 
    - Glossary  - Key       terms and model information. 
    - Frequent Questions  –       Information to help users. 
    - Documents  –       Methodology documentation, user's manuals, background and supporting       information, changes from previous versions, and document archive, including user's manuals from previous versions. 

----

### Local Navigation

    - RSEI Home
    - Basic Information
    - Technical Information
    - How to Use—and Not Use—RSEI
    - Get RSEI
    - Glossary
    - Frequent Questions
    - Documents

----

    - EPA Home
    - Privacy and Security Notice
    - Contact Us

Jump to main content.