alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2398-000]


Baconton Power LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 5, 2000.
    Baconton Power LLC (Baconton) submitted for filing a rate schedule 
under which Baconton will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions as a marketer. Baconton also requested waiver of various 
Commission regulations. In particular, Baconton requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability of Baconton.
    On May 31, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Baconton should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Baconton is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Baconton's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 30, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14630 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### § 324.1 General.

This regulation prescribes in addition to the general policies of 33 CFR part 320 and procedures of 33 CFR part 325, those special policies, practices and procedures to be followed by the Corps of Engineers in connection with the review of applications for Department of the Army (DA) permits to authorize the transportation of dredged material by vessel or other vehicle for the purpose of dumping it in ocean waters at dumping sites designated under 40 CFR part 228 pursuant to section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1413) (hereinafter referred to as section 103). See 33 CFR 320.2(h). Activities involving the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping in the ocean waters also require DA permits under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403) for the dredging in navigable waters of the United States. Applicants for DA permits under this part should also refer to 33 CFR part 322 to satisfy the requirements of Section 10.
Exhibit
10.9


 


Execution copy


 


Mill
River Investment Company


No.
10-37C, Lane One, Weifang West Road,


Pudong
District, Shanghai China 200122


Telephone
Number: 8621-5888 232


 


Dated
as of October 30, 2019


 


GreenVision
Acquisition Corp.


No.
10-37C, Lane One, Weifang West Road,


Pudong
District, Shanghai China 200122


Attn.:
Zhigeng Fu, Chief Executive Officer


 


Re:
Administrative Services Agreement


 


Gentlemen:


 


Reference
is made to that certain Administrative Services Agreement dated as of October 1, 2019 between GreenVision Acquisition Corp. and
Mill River Investment Company.


 


This
letter shall confirm our mutual agreement that the Administrative Services Agreement has been terminated in full as of October
30, 2019 without any further obligation of either party and without liability of GreenVision Acquisition Corp.to Mill River Investment
Company. 




 


	 	Very truly
    yours,
	 	 
	 	MILL RIVER
    INVESTMENT COMPANY
	 	 
		By: 	/s/
    Qi Ye
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED: 	Qi Ye, President




 


	GREENVISION
    ACQUISITION CORP.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Zhigeng Fu	 
	Zhigeng
    (David) Fu, Chief Executive Officer
§ 8.3 Organization of the Coast Guard Reserve. ( a ) The Coast Guard Reserve is organized, trained and equipped under the direction of the Commandant.
( b ) The Director of Reserve and Training is responsible for the overall administration and supervision of the Reserve.
( c ) In Atlantic Area, Integrated Support Commands have responsibility for local Reserve issues; however, in Pacific Area, responsibility for local Reserve issues remains with District Commanders.
( d ) Most Coast Guard Reservists are fully integrated into active duty Coast Guard units. There, Reservists perform the same duties and have the same responsibilities as their active duty counterparts. Their integrated work prepares Reservists to perform the duties of their mobilization assignments while at the same time providing assistance to the active service. Some Reservists are assigned to dedicated Reserve units where they train and mobilize in support of national defense operations.
[CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33662, June 28, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 67

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

#### § 67.05-15 Operating periods of obstruction lights.

Obstruction lights shall be displayed at all times between the hours of sunset and sunrise, local time, commencing at the time the construction of a structure is begun. During construction and until such time as a platform capable of supporting the obstruction lights is completed, the fixed lights on an attending vessel shall be used. In addition, when lights are in use for general illumination to facilitate the construction or operation of a structure, and can be seen from any angle of approach at a distance equal to that prescribed for the obstruction lights for the class of structure, the actual operation of obstruction lights also will not be required.

[CGFR 58-34, 23 FR 7701, Oct. 4, 1958]
#### § 49.05-5 Bonding of trustee.

The trustee or trustees appointed to receive moneys in behalf of incompetent personnel shall furnish a bond in all cases when the amounts to be received may be expected to exceed $1,000, and in such other cases when deemed appropriate by the Commandant. The bond so required and furnished shall have as surety a company approved by the Federal Government, and shall be in such amount as is required by the Commandant. Such bonds shall be continued in effect for the life of trusteeship and expenses in connection with the furnishing and renewal of such bonds may be paid out of sums due the incompetent.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BallyTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Haddrill, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to myknowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date:  February 14,2008

 
| /s/Richard  Haddrill                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard Haddrill                       |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

----
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

May 1997 A-2 NASS, USDA

Crop Summary: Production, United States,

1995-96 and Forecasted 1996-97

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 : Utilized Production 

 :----------------------------------------------------

 Crop : : Apr 1, : May 1, 

 : : 1997 : 1997

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Crop Year 1/ : 1995-96 1996-97 1996-97

 :

 : 1,000 Tons

Citrus Fruits : 

 Oranges : 11,723 12,726 12,861

 Grapefruit : 2,718 3,062 3,062

 Lemons 2/ : 992 950 950

 Tangerines : 348 432 437
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board















Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Page 1 of 1

Gmall Calenclar Documents l'Ilolos Groups I/IIeb more,.

I 5&a1Ch Mail II Search !lieWob I~=..*"

CC1mposo Mall

Inbox{71

S-1lIm:d

C!la1~

5e1l1 MI\lI

The Average IQ is 100.• www.TheFreollllosl.ccm.'Mlalisyours?Fodoutw'lhourFreoIQTosl.

~JI"k.IoJnbox I A..hlYe I I Repoll8pem I ( Delete I [~~~c1,!,~_._.j

catalyst tests lOb.. x

Phyllis Fox illis paper WO<J~d sU9gesll/'.a: SCR '5 nel \1ablo en 1'9r,:e Of PRO coals. bul

Flemming Hansen Pn11!'s. Wo t'a'ien'l ~cne ~ny mere I~S:"9 s,nce :nen en Ig<llle coa'. IMll

Phyllis Fox V'lny would tho cmaly$l be ccvcmd With a:', i" n slTlall,oaclor. !lui no: .lla'

Flommlng Hanson 10 me ShOt.; d'Cltll

Clans

All Mail

5pam{101

Trash

Contacts

Ibelieve lIlal when eve'Ylhin9 bocomos mcm cernpad you are l1lO(e sensitive to wall cooling, shottet clistances between tums ancI supports ancI ammonia inj

coul<ln't build up on a fuU scale SCR os well. but instead of 111001 in distance between tho luming vane ancl !lie catalysl may be 20 feEt. A /ol of ash ptOblen

hilling lhe calalysl channels parallel but at an angle. The lee side wi!I build up ash.

This is nol very scientifIC. but is II gellGflll observation lrom teals.

Flommlng G. Hansen

Mansgor 5CR DeNOx Catalyst

Halder Topsoo, Inc.

281·228-5120 (cIflC8)

281·228·5129 (rox)

281-684-6820 (cell)

FGH@Topsoe.ccm

www.lopsoe cern

enst

Sean:I1. add. Of IllVlle

"'hylilt '01" cP!lY'II.!t>IGllmalLCom.

OIlUI2OClIouePM

•__...1·

To,:Ie-n'u'nnl:t ti.nttn'" d'G~C:teI'l-Of'.col'l'l~

cc SulljodRo: calIIrU .....

PllyWsFox

Sign Into Chat

Amber Ma~blo

8llIlllIraWosi

Clyde Murley

David HGwek4mp

Ivan

jessica naom;

Joanno SpaIdng

Jcnweston-caw... Nalhlln Millet

Petra Pless

OIl~OllU IWd..CoIllm

labelS

Ecitlabels

Invile a Illene!

Reply Fcrwara

!!.llIck.loJnl!.oJl I Archive I I Ropoll8P1/ll I I Oo!elo I iMore Adlons

Send messagoslrom ycur cl!leU!naitad~osSllS using your Gmd=1. leJI'!lmOlo

You are currenlly using 3433 MB 154%1 of your 6320 MB.

Gmoll vIow: s1anckrd I111m.an ....11 _.HIML L"1ftlTIOIt

C2C07 G.~I<> •TefIDUIlUu • P.dYgqPoIlor· P8Ill!Jlmfoldn •GoolIlo.Horne

http://mail.google.comlmaill?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ymdfwq781 tpu 1115/2008
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Alliance Gaming Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Hadrill,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, tomy knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

Dated:  November8, 2004
| /s/ Richard Haddrill                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive  Officer)         |   |

 

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAUL PELAYO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

G. HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-16837

D.C. No. 5:13-cv-03618-RMW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016 ** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Saul Pelayo appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s

summary judgment on the basis of failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 

FILED

DEC 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9thCir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Pelayo’s

retaliation claim because Pelayo failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as

to whether he properly exhausted administrative remedies or whether

administrative remedies were effectively unavailable to him. See Woodford v.

Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion of administrative remedies . . .

means using all steps that the agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the

agency addresses the issues on the merits).” (emphasis, citation, and internal

quotation marks omitted)); Paramo, 775 F.3d at 1191 (a prisoner who does not

exhaust administrative remedies must show that “there is something particular in

his case that made the existing and generally available administrative remedies

effectively unavailable to him . . . .”); see also McBride v. Lopez, 807 F.3d 982,

987-88 (9th Cir. 2015)(to show that a threat rendered the prison grievance system

unavailable, a prisoner must show that he actually believed prison officials would

retaliate against him, and that his belief was objectively reasonable). 

Pelayo’s motion to compel discovery, filed on July 7, 2016, is denied. 

AFFIRMED.

2 15-16837
#### § 2.26 Inland waters.

*Inland waters* means the waters shoreward of the territorial sea baseline.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 13

- 00820

- CR

Jose Isabel MARTINEZ

- HERNANDEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CRU

- 010D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 17, 2015.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-30-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   36,579
<RECEIVABLES>                                  175,722
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,720
<INVENTORY>                                    169,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               560,519
<PP&E>                                         541,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                 323,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,533,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          577,663
<BONDS>                                        677,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    42,337
<COMMON>                                       2,487
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,533,262
<SALES>                                        632,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               683,431
<CGS>                                          610,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  634,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               78,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (39,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (13,401)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (25,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25,781)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
AsiaInfo-Linkage, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jun Wu, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s)1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| | 
| |  | /s/ Jun Wu             
| |  | Jun Wu                 
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| | 
| |  | February 28, 2011
#### § 209.160 The California Debris Commission.

Section 1 of the Act of Congress of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. 507; 33 U.S.C. 661), created the California Debris Commission, consisting of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, to regulate under the supervision of the Chief of Engineers and direction of the Secretary of the Army, hydraulic mining in the territory drained by the Sacramento and San Joaquin River systems, California. Under section 9 of the act (27 Stat. 508; 33 U.S.C. 669), the individual proprietor or proprietors, or in case of a corporation, its manager or agent appointed for that purpose, owning mining ground in this territory which it is desired to work by the hydraulic process, must file with the Commission a verified petition, setting forth such facts as will comply with law and the rules prescribed by the Commission. The law contains detailed instructions with regard to facts required to be shown by the petitioner and the procedure to be followed by the Commission in issuing an order directing the methods and specifying the manner in which operations shall proceed. Full information on law and procedure can be obtained from the Secretary, California Debris Commission, 650 Capitol Mall, Sacramento, California 95814.
§ 3.05-1 First district. ( a ) The District Office is in Boston, Massachusetts.
( b ) The First Coast Guard District is comprised of: Maine; New Hampshire; Vermont; Massachusetts; Rhode Island; Connecticut; New York except that part north of latitude 42° N. and west of longitude 74°39′ W; that part of New Jersey north of 40°18′ N. latitude, east of 74°30.5′ W. longitude, and northeast of a line from 40°18′ N. 74°30.5′ W. north-northwesterly to the New York, New Jersey & Pennsylvania boundaries at Tristate; all U.S. Naval reservations on shore at Newfoundland; the ocean area encompassed by the Search and Rescue boundary between Canada and the United States easterly to longitude 63° W.; thence due south to latitude 41° N.; thence southwesterly along a line bearing 219°T to the point of intersection at 37° N. latitude, 67°13′ W. longitude with a line bearing 122°T from the New Jersey shoreline at 40°18′ N. latitude (just south of the Shrewsbury River); thence northwesterly along this line to the coast.
[CGFR 61-40, 26 FR 10344, Nov. 3, 1961, as amended by CGD 87-008, 52 FR 13084, Apr. 21, 1987; CGD 96-016, 61 FR 21958, May 13, 1996]
#### § 3.35-35 Sector St. Petersburg Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

Sector St. Petersburg's sector office is located in St. Petersburg, FL. The boundaries of Sector St. Petersburg's Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone start at the Florida coast at30°05′45′′ N., 084°04′34′′ W., proceeding northerly along the boundary between Wakulla and Jefferson counties to position 30°15′00′′ N., 084°04′33′′ W.; thence west to latitude 30°15′00′′ N, longitude 84°45′00′′ W; thence north to the Florida-Georgia boundary at longitude 84°45′00′′ W; thence east along the Florida-Georgia boundary to longitude 83°00′00′′ W; thence southeast to latitude 28°00′00′′ N, longitude 81°30′00′′ W; thence south along 81°30′00′′ W to the northern boundary of Collier County, FL, and then following along the boundaries of Collier County, east along the northern boundary to the eastern boundary and then south along the eastern boundary to the southern boundary and then west along the southern boundary to latitude 25°48′12′′ N, longitude 81°20′39′′ W; thence southwest to the outermost extent of the EEZ at latitude 24°18′57′′ N, longitude 84°50′48′′ W; thence west along the outermost extent of the EEZ to latitude 24°48′13′′ N, longitude 85°50′05′′ W; thence northeast to position 29°23′09′′ N., 084°04′34′′ W.; thence due north the point of origin.

[USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36322, July 2, 2007, as amended by USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44278, July 27, 2015]