alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ToC

A-Abuse, Gross Neglect, Exploitation

B-Access to Information by Resident or Resident's Representative

C-Admission, Transfer, Discharge, Eviction

D-Autonomy, Choice, Preference, Exercise of Rights, Privacy

E-Financial, Property (Except Financial Exploitation)

B-6 Board & Care & Similar Facilities Complaint Table by State (full table)

F-Care

G-Rehabilitation or Maintenance of Function

H-Restraints - Chemical and Physical

I-Activities and Social Services

J-Dietary

K-Environment

L-Policies, Procedures, Attitudes, Resources

M-Staffing

N-Certification/Licensing Agency

O-State Medicaid Agency

P-System/Others

B-6 Board & Care & Similar Facilities Complaint Table by Region (full table)

# B-6 BC-Comp full by State

Table of Contents

# B-6 BC-Comp full by Region

Table of Contents

# A Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation

Table of Contents

# B Access to Information

Table of Contents

# C Admission, Transfer, Disch

Table of Contents

# D Choice, Privacy

Table of Contents

# E Financial, Property

Table of Contents

# F Care

Table of Contents

# G Rehab or Maint of Function

Table of Contents

# H Restraints

Table of Contents

# I Activities & Social Services

Table of Contents

# J Dietary

Table of Contents

# K Environment

Table of Contents

# L Policies, Procedures

Table of Contents

# M Staffing

Table of Contents

# N Certification Agency

Table of Contents

# O State Medicaid Agency

Table of Contents

# P System, Others

Table of Contents
§ 83.17 Action by stand-on vessel (Rule 17). ( a ) ( i ) Where one of two vessels is to keep out of the way, the other shall keep her course and speed.
( ii ) The latter vessel may, however, take action to avoid collision by her maneuver alone, as soon as it becomes apparent to her that the vessel required to keep out of the way is not taking appropriate action in compliance with these Rules.
( b ) When, from any cause, the vessel required to keep her course and speed finds herself so close that collision cannot be avoided by the action of the give-way vessel alone, she shall take such action as will best aid to avoid collision.
( c ) A power-driven vessel which takes action in a crossing situation in accordance with paragraph (a)(ii) of this Rule to avoid collision with another power-driven vessel shall, if the circumstances of the case admit, not alter course to port for a vessel on her own port side.
( d ) This Rule does not relieve the give-way vessel of her obligation to keep out of the way.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-81098-MIDDLEBROOKS/Matthewman

HANS OTTO ALBERTSON,

Appellant,

vs.

BARCLAY BRELAND FAMILY OFFICE LLC,

Appellee.

________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by 

Magistrate Judge William Matthewman (the “Report”) on February 27, 2023. (DE 10). The Report 

recommends that the Bankruptcy Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Final Judgment in the 

Adversary Proceeding titled Barclay Breland Family Office, LLC v. Hans Otto Albertson, Ad. 

Proc. Case No. 19-01618-EPK be affirmed. 

The deadline to file objections to the Report elapsed on March 13, 2023. No objections 

have been filed to date. After a careful review of Judge Matthewman’s Report and the record as a 

whole, I agree with the Report’s recommendations. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) Magistrate William Matthewman’s Report and Recommendation (DE 10) is 

ADOPTED.

(2) The Bankruptcy Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Final Judgment in the Adversary 

Proceeding titled Barclay Breland Family Office, LLC v. Hans Otto Albertson, Ad. 

Proc. Case No. 19-01618-EPK are AFFIRMED.

Case 9:22-cv-81098-DMM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

(3) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE and DENY AS MOOT all pending 

motions.

SIGNED in Chambers in West Palm Beach, Florida, this 17th day of March, 2023.

Donald M. Middlebrooks

United States District Judge

Case 9:22-cv-81098-DMM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2023 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Boards of Contract Appeals — Alternative Dispute Resolution (BCA-ADR) Sharing Arrangement","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"y2nmfODodB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/sharing\/\">Boards of Contract Appeals — Alternative Dispute Resolution (BCA-ADR) Sharing Arrangement<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/sharing\/embed\/#?secret=y2nmfODodB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Boards of Contract Appeals — Alternative Dispute Resolution (BCA-ADR) Sharing Arrangement” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"y2nmfODodB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 4.1


 


Share Certificate


 


	Number of certificate	 	Number of shares
	 	 	 
	 	 	 


 


QILIAN INTERNATIONAL HOLDING GROUP LIMITED


 


COMPANY NUMBER [NUMBER]


 


This is to certify that [Name]
of [Address] is the registered holder of [Number] [Share Class] shares of [Value] each being [partly paid to the extent of [amount
in words][amount in numerals] per share]]/[fully paid][and numbered [number]] in the above-named company, subject to the memorandum
and articles of association of the company.


 


[Transfer date]


 


	 	 	 
	Director	 	Director/ Secretary
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-677 (Review)]

## Determination 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on coumarin from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the                           ( print page 36164)                        United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                 

## Background 

The Commission instituted this review on December 30, 1999 (64 FR 73576, December 30, 1999) and determined on April 6, 2000 that it would conduct an expedited review (65 FR 24504, April 26, 2000). The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on May 30, 2000. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3305 (May 2000), entitled Coumarin From China: Investigation No. 731-TA-677 (Review).

Issued: May 31, 2000.

By order of the Commission. 

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. § 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 00-14316 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

#### § 150.45 Emergency deviation from this subchapter or the operations manual.

In an emergency, any person may deviate from any requirement in this subchapter, or any procedure in the operations manual, to ensure the safety of life, property, or the environment. Each deviation must be reported to the Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority, at the earliest possible time.

[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39181, July 1, 2013]
Order filed November 25 , 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00604

- CV

____________ BRIDGESTONE LAKES CO MMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC. , Appellant

V.

BRIDGESTONE LAKES DE VELOPMENT COMPANY, I NC. AND ROBERT A. HUDSON, CL AUDIA J. HUDSON AND TIFFANY A.

ROATH, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 53723



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed November 6, 2014 . Our review has determined
that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the supersedeas bond.The Harris County District Clerk is dir ected to file a supplemental clerk’s

record on or before December 15, 2015, containing the supersedeas bond.
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified state ment that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 21.1**
**Subsidiaries of Palm, Inc.**
Palm Comércio de Aparelhos Eletrônicos Ltda. (Brazil)
Palm Europe Limited (UK)
Palm Italy S.r.l. (Italy)
palmOne France (France)
palmOne Germany GmbH (Germany)
Palm Global Operations Ltd. (Ireland)
Palm Asia Pacific Limited (Hong Kong)
palmOne Ireland Investment (Ireland)
Palm Latin America, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.)
palmOne Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
Palm Benelux B.V. (Netherlands)
Palm Australasia Pty Limited (Australia)
Palm Canada Inc. (Canada)
Palm Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
Palm Nordic AB (Sweden)
palmOne, K.K. (Japan)
Handspring International SARL (Switzerland)
Handspring International Ltd. (BVI)
Handspring Facility Company LLC (Delaware, U.S.)
§ 151.71 Operating requirements: Discharge of garbage within special areas. ( a ) When a ship is located within a special area referenced in § 151.53 of this part, no person may discharge garbage into the water, except as allowed in this section.
( b ) Food wastes shall only be discharged while the ship is en route and— ( 1 ) As far as practicable from the nearest land or nearest ice shelf, but not less than 12 nautical miles from the nearest land or nearest ice shelf;
( 2 ) After having been processed with a grinder or comminuter specified in § 151.75; and
( 3 ) Not contaminated by any other garbage type.
( 4 ) The discharge of introduced avian products, including poultry and poultry parts, is not permitted in the Antarctic area unless it has been treated to be made sterile.
( c ) Cargo residues that cannot be recovered using commonly available methods for unloading may be discharged where all the following conditions are satisfied: ( 1 ) The cargo residues, cleaning agents or additives contained in the cargo hold washing water do not contain any substances that are harmful to the marine environment.
( 2 ) Both the port of departure and the next port of destination must be within the special area and the ship will not transit outside of the special area when moving between those ports.
( 3 ) No adequate reception facilities are available at those ports.
( 4 ) When the conditions of paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) of this section have been fulfilled, discharge of cargo hold washing water containing residues shall be made as far as practicable from the nearest land or the nearest ice shelf and not less than 12 nautical miles from the nearest land or the nearest ice shelf.
( d ) Cleaning agents or additives contained in deck and external surfaces wash water may be discharged only if those substances are not harmful to the marine environment.
( e ) Mixtures of garbage having different discharge requirements must be: ( 1 ) Retained on board for later disposal ashore; or
( 2 ) Discharged in accordance with the more stringent requirement prescribed by paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
[USCG-2012-1049, 78 FR 13492, Feb. 28, 2013]
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 4

To declare it to be the policy of the United States to deploy a national

missile defense.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. BLILEY, Mr.

BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. HEFLEY,

Mrs. FOWLER, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. CRAMER,

Mr. SNYDER, Mr. SISISKY, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. WATTS

of Oklahoma, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. TURNER, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. BRADY of

Pennsylvania, Mr. HOYER, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr.

SKELTON, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr.

HALL of Texas, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. COX, Mr. DICKS, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. DELAY, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr.

HOSTETTLER, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. ABERCROMBIE,

Mr. EVERETT, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. REYES, Mr. PICKETT, Mr.

GIBBONS, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. SCHAFFER, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr.

EDWARDS, Mr. TANNER, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr.

SCOTT, Mr. GOODE, Mr. BERRY, and Mr. HILL of Indiana) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To declare it to be the policy of the United States to deploy

a national missile defense.
2

•HR 4 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That it is the policy of the United States to deploy a na4 tional missile defense.

Æ
#### § 167.52 In the approaches to Portland, ME: Eastern approach.

(a) A separation zone 1 mile wide is established and is centered upon the following geographical positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 43°30.18′ N | 069°59.17′ W. |
| 43°24.28′ N | 069°32.70′ W. |

(b) A traffic lane 1⁄2 miles wide is established on each side of the separation zone.

[USCG-2010-0718, 75 FR 77533, Dec. 13, 2010]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"ADR Outcomes at the CBCA","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"x8YYE4NR7w\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/16-outcomes\/\">ADR Outcomes at the CBCA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/16-outcomes\/embed\/#?secret=x8YYE4NR7w\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ADR Outcomes at the CBCA” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"x8YYE4NR7w\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
§ 20.1307 Use of judgments of conviction. ( a ) A judgment of conviction by a Federal court is conclusive in any S&R proceeding under this part concerning any act or offense described in 46 U.S.C. 7703 or 7704 when the act or offense is the same as in the Federal conviction.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no judgment of conviction by a State court is conclusive in any S&R proceeding under this part concerning any act or offense described in 46 U.S.C. 7703 or 7704, even when an act or offense forming the basis of the charge in the proceeding is the same as in the State conviction. But the judgment is admissible in evidence and constitutes substantial evidence adverse to the respondent.
( c ) A judgment of conviction by a Federal or State court for a violation is conclusive in the proceeding if an S&R proceeding alleges conviction for— ( 1 ) A violation of a dangerous-drug law;
( 2 ) An offense that would prevent the issuance or renewal of a merchant mariner's license, merchant mariner credential, certificate of registry, or document; or
( 3 ) An offense described in subparagraph 205(a)(3)(A) or (B) of the National Driver Register Act of 1982 (23 U.S.C.S. 401, note).
( d ) If the respondent participates in the scheme of a State for the expungement of convictions, and if he or she pleads *guilty* or *no contest* or, by order of the trial court, has to attend classes, contribute time or money, receive treatment, submit to any manner of probation or supervision, or forgo appeal of the finding of the trial court, the Coast Guard regards him or her, for the purposes of 46 U.S.C. 7703 or 7704, as having received a conviction. The Coast Guard does not consider the conviction expunged without proof that the expungement is due to the conviction's having been in error.
( e ) No respondent may challenge the jurisdiction of a Federal or State court in any proceeding under 46 U.S.C. 7703 or 7704.
[CGD 98-3472, 64 FR 28062, May 24, 1999, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11211, Mar. 16, 2009]
Editorial Note on Part 159
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 159.19 Testing equivalency. ( a ) If a test required by this part may not be practicable or necessary, a manufacturer may apply to the Commanding Officer (MSC), Attn: Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7430, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7430 for deletion or approval of an alternative test as equivalent to the test requirements in this part. The application must include the manufacturer's justification for deletion or the alternative test and any alternative test data.
( b ) The Coast Guard notifies the manufacturer of its determination under paragraph (a) of this section and that determination is final.
[CGD 73-83, 40 FR 4624, Jan. 30, 1975, as amended by CGD 82-063a, 48 FR 4776, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 88-052, 53 FR 25122, July 1, 1988; CGD 96-026, 61 FR 33668, June 28, 1996; USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33641, June 25, 2001; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36286, June 25, 2010; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38439, July 7, 2014; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35083, July 28, 2017]
§ 5.45 Patrol sign. ( a ) *Description.* The Auxiliary facility patrol sign has the words “Coast Guard Auxiliary Patrol” in black or dark blue lettering and must contain the Auxiliary emblem, as described in this subpart, centered within the confines of a broad diagonal red (Coast Guard red) stripe which is at a 70 degree angle rising toward the bow of the vessel. The red (Coast Guard red) stripe is followed, away from the bow, by two narrow, parallel stripes—first a white stripe, and then a medium blue (Coast Guard blue) stripe. The background of the sign must be white.
( b ) *Display.* ( 1 ) The patrol sign must be displayed by vessels while on patrol, whether or not the vessel is underway.
( 2 ) The patrol sign must be displayed on the forward half of each side and may be displayed on the stern of the vessel.
( 3 ) The patrol sign may be displayed on each side of a motorized vehicle or trailer containing a mobile radio or radio direction finding unit while assigned to Coast Guard duty. Normally, they will be placed in any legal position on the upper half of both sides of the vehicle.