alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James McLENAGHAN, Administrator of the Estate of James Murray, Appellant, v. Robert A. BILLOW.

No. 12629.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Nov. 7, 1958.

Decided Nov. 17, 1958.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 5, 1958.

Benjamin Pomerantz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Maurice A. Hartnett, III, Dover, Del., on the brief), for appellant.

William Prickett, Wilmington, Del. (William F. Taylor, Prickett & Prickett, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for ap-pellee.

Before MARIS, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff administrator appeals from a summary judgment entered against him in the District Court for the District of Delaware in an action brought to recover damages for the wrongful death of his decedent who was killed when an automobile driven by the defendant struck him while he was walking on a highway at night south of Dover. The facts are fully stated in the opinion filed in the District Court by Judge Layton, 161 F.Supp. 835, and need not be repeated here. Suffice it to say that we are in full accord with the conclusion of the district court, for the reasons stated in Judge Layton's opinion, that the uncontroverted facts, as to the existence of which no genuine issue existed, disclosed that the plaintiff’s decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of Delaware law and that the Delaware doctrine of the last clear chance was not applicable. The district court accordingly did not err in entering summary judgment on the defendant’s motion.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/17/2000 Page 1 of 4
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/17/2000 Page 2 of 4
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/17/2000 Page 3 of 4
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 15 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/17/2000 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT
      32.2


STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Christopher Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Christopher
      Ryan


Christopher
      Ryan


Chief
      Financial Officer








Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 11-6-2008 

# U SA v . M arc Sy k es P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 07-4018

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . M ar c Sy ke s " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 254. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/254*T he H onor abl e Eugene E. Si l er , J r . , Seni orC i r cui tJ udge fort he U ni t ed St at es

C our tof A ppeal s fort he Si xt h C i r cui t , s i t t i ng bydes i gnat i on. NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N o. 07- 4018

___________ UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. M AR C SYK ES a / k / a M - DOC M a rc S yk e s , A ppel l ant

___________ O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt

fort he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s ey ( D . C . N o. 03- cr - 00678- 4) D i s t r i ctJ udge: T he H onor abl e M aryC ooper

___________ Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

O ct ober31, 2008 B E F O R E : M cK E E , N Y G A A R D , and S ILE R , C i rcui tJudg es. * ( Fi l ed: N ovember6, 2008)2 ___________ OPI NI ON O F THE COURT

___________ SI L E R , C i r cui tJ udge. A p p e llan t, M a rc S yk e s, e n ter e d in to a p lea a g re e m e n t w ith th e G o v e rn m e n t, wh e r e b yh e a g r e e d t o p l e a d g u i l t yt o o n e c o u n to f c o n s p i r a c yt o d i s t r i b u t e o v e r5 0 g r a ms o f c o c a in e a n d o v e r 5 0 0 g ra m s o f c o c a in e p o w d e r. T h e D istric t C o u rt se n ten c e d h im to 1 6 6 mo n t h s ’ i n c a r c e r a t i o n . W e wi l l a f f i r m. B eca us e w e w r i t e exc l us i vel yfort he part i es w ho ar e fa m i l i arw i t h t he fa ct s and the pr ocee di ngs bel ow , w e w i l l notr evi s i tt hem her e. Pur s uantt o A n d e rs v . C a lif o rn ia , 386 U . S. 738 ( 1967) , Sy kes ’ s couns el has exami ned the r ecor d, concl uded thatt her e ar e no n o n - f r i v o l o u s i s s u e s f

o rr e v i e w, a n d h a s r e q u e s t e d p e r mi s s i o n t o wi t h d r a w. W e, t oo, have thor oughl yexami ned the r ecor d and ca n fi nd no non- fr i vol ous i s s ues t o be r ai s ed i n t hi s appea l . H ence , w e w i l l aff i r m t he j udgm entof the D i s t r i ct Co u r ta n d g r a n tc o u n s e l ’ s mo t i o n t o wi t h d r a w.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

-1-

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-60794

Summary Calendar

JAY ALLEN APEDAILE,

Petitioner,

VERSUS

U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Nothern District of Texas

(86641-080)

July 13, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel on appeal

for Jay A. Apedaile, has filed a motion to withdraw form

representation of Apedaile and a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the

briefs and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, Apedaile’s attorney’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED;

the attorney is excused for further responsibilities in this case

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
-2-
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER00-2333-000]


Horsehead Industries, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 5, 2000.
    Horsehead Industries, Inc. (Horsehead) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Horsehead will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions as a marketer. Horsehead also requested waiver 
of various Commission regulations. In particular, Horsehead requested 
that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuance of securities and assumptions of liability by 
Horsehead.
    On May 31, 2000, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and 
Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to 
the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Horsehead should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Horsehead is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Horsehead's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 30, 2000.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at 
http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for 
assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14629 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 334.102 Sandy Hook Bay, Naval Weapons Station EARLE, Piers and Terminal Channel, restricted area, Middletown, New Jersey. ( a ) *The area.* All of the navigable waters within the area bounded by these coordinates: Latitude 40°25′55.6′′ N, longitude 074°04′31.4′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°26′54.0′′ N, longitude 074°03′53.0′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°26′58.0′′ N, longitude 074°04′03.0′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°27′56.0′′ N, longitude 074°03′24.0′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°27′41.7′′ N, longitude 074°02′45.0′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°28′23.5′′ N, longitude 074°02′16.6′′W; thence to Latitude 40°28′21.2′′ N, longitude 074°01′56.0′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°28′07.9′′ N, longitude 074°02′18.6′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°27′39.3′′ N, longitude 074°02′38.3′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°27′28.5′′ N, longitude 074°02′10.4′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°26′29.5′′ N, longitude 074°02′51.2′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°26′31.4′′ N, longitude 074°02′55.4′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°25′27.1′′ N, longitude 074°03′39.7′′W longitude; and thence along the shoreline to the point of origin (NAD 83).
The Department of the Navy plans to install buoys along these coordinates to outline the Restricted Area.
( b ) *The regulation.* ( 1 ) Except as set forth in subparagraph (b)(2), no persons, unauthorized vessels or other unauthorized craft may enter the restricted area at any time;
( 2 ) Vessels are authorized to cross the Terminal Channel provided that there are no naval vessels then transiting the channel bounded by: Latitude 40°27′41.7′′ N, longitude 074°02′45.0′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°28′23.5′′ N, longitude 074°02′16.6′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°28′21.2′′ N, longitude 074°01′56.0′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°28′07.9′′ N, longitude 074°02′18.6′′ W; thence to Latitude 40°27′39.3′′ N, longitude 074°02′38.3′′ W); and (3) No person may swim in the Restricted Area.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulation in this section, promulgated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, Naval Weapons Station Earle, and/or other persons or agencies as he/she may designate.
[68 FR 37971, June 26, 2003]
§ 334.1310 Lutak Inlet, Alaska; restricted areas. ( a ) *The areas* — ( 1 ) *Army POL dock restricted area.* ( i ) The waters of Lutak Inlet bounded as follows: Beginning at the water's edge 900 feet northwest of the centerline of the landward end of the POL dock; thence 800 feet, 51° true; thence 1,400 feet, 113° true; thence 450 feet, 211° true to the water's edge at a point approximately 720 feet from the most southwest corner of the seaward end of the POL dock; thence along the water's edge to the point of beginning.
( ii ) The area will be marked at points approximately 200 feet apart along the shore by white signs containing the word “Warning.” The signs will not be lighted.
( 2 ) *Dry Cargo dock mooring area.* ( i ) The waters within 60 feet off the face of the dock.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) No person, vessel or other watercraft shall enter or remain in the Army POL dock restricted area when tankers are engaged in discharging oil at the dock.
( 2 ) The dropping and dragging of anchors, weights, or other ground tackle within the Dry Cargo dock mooring area is prohibited.
( 3 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, Anchorage, Alaska, and such agencies as he may designate.
[33 FR 7723, May 25, 1968. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17559, Apr. 10, 1997]
(

To:

Through:

From:

MEMORANDUM

STACK TEST FILE - FLYING J

Jeff Dean, Compliance SectionManage~· Harold Burge, Environmental Scientist

Date: 2120/2003

Subject: Company:

Testers:

Location:

Source:

AIRS#:

AO#:

Action Code:

Subject:

FlyingJ

Air Pollution Testing/Clean Air Engineering

333 W. Center St., North Salt Lake, Davis Co., UT

FCC Regenrator Vent

01100008

DAQE-330.Q2 dated 6/3/2002

3A

Review of Test Reports dated 1211812002 & 21612003

(

On 12120/2002 DAQ received a test report for the FCC Catalyst Regenerator Vent. The validity

of the PMIO test results were questioned, and it was detennined that the assist air line valves were

not operating according to design specifications. A report of the PM10 retest was received on

216/2003. In accordance with AO Conditions 16, 21.C.4, 22.C.3, & 24.C.4, testing was

performed to verify and/or update the FCC Regenerator Vent S02, NOx, & PMIO emission

factors. The DAQ-calculated test results are:

Source Test Date Pollutant Result VerifiedlUpdated

Emission Factor

FCC Regenerator 10/23/2002 S02 43.3521blhr 43.3521blhr

Vent

1012312002 NOx 131 ppmdv 131 ppmdv

1211912002 PM10 19lblkbbl 22lblkbbl

DEVIATIONS:

CONCLUSIONS:

CURRENT

RECOMMENDATIONS:

No deviations were noted.

The verified/updated emission factors appear to be acceptable.

None.
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-59350, 333-31784, and 333-44822 on Form S-8
of our report relating to the financial statements of Onvia, Inc. (formerly known as Onvia.com, Inc.) dated March 14, 2005 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the change in accounting for
goodwill upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002, as discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements), appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Onvia, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.





|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|Seattle, Washington      
|March 22, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR Programs","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kh2zwrdRar\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/conflict-prevention-management-and-resolution-resources-for-federal-adr-programs\/\">Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR Programs<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/conflict-prevention-management-and-resolution-resources-for-federal-adr-programs\/embed\/#?secret=kh2zwrdRar\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR Programs” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"kh2zwrdRar\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14557]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-255-007]

TransColorado Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

June 5, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 31, 2000, pursuant to 18 CFR 154.7 and 
154.203, and in compliance with the Commission's letter order issued 
March 20, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-255-000, TransColorado Gas 
Transmission Company tenders for filing and acceptance, to be effective 
May 26, 2000, Seventh Revised Sheet No. 21. Third Revised Sheet No. 22 
and Second Revised Sheet No. 23 to Original Volume No. 1 of its FERC 
Gas Tariff (TransColorado's tariff).
    TransColorado states that the tendered tariff sheets revise 
TransColorado's Tariff to implement new negotiated-rate transportation 
service agreements between TransColorado and Western Gas Resources, 
Inc., Enron North America, Inn., Enserco Energy, Inc. and Barrett 
Resources Corporation. TransColorado requests waiver of 18 CFR 154.207 
so that the tendered tariff sheets may become effective May 26, 2000.
    TransColorado states that a copy of this filing has been served 
upon all parties to this proceeding, TransColorado's customers, the 
Colorado Public Utilities Commission and New Mexico Public Utilities 
Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14557 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
 AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, DOI.
 ACTION: Notice of issuance of two Letters of Authorization to take marine mammals incidental to oil and gas industry activities.
 SUMMARY: In accordance with section 101(a)(5)(A) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service implementing regulations [50 CFR 18.27(f)(3)], notice is hereby given that two Letters of Authorization to take polar bears and Pacific walrus incidental to oil and gas industry exploration activities have been issued to the following companies: Company
Activity
Date issuedWestern Geophysical Company
Exploration
May 22, 2000.ARCO Alaska, Inc.
Exploration
May 26, 2000.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John W. Bridges at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management Office, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99503, (800) 362-5148 or (907) 786-3810.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Letters of Authorization were issued in accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Federal Rules and Regulations “Marine Mammals; Incidental Take During Specified Activities (65 FR 16828; March 30, 2000).” Dated: May 31, 2000. Gary Edwards, Deputy Regional Director.


[FR Doc. 00-14454  Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7189** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ANTONE HENRY POINDEXTER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eas tern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:97

- cr - 00079

- JCC

- 1; 3:11

- cv - 00175

- REP )

Submitted : February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un publish ed per curiam opinion
. Antone Henry Poindexter, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antone Henry Poindexter appeals the district court ’ s order addressing Poindexter’s December 1, 2010, letter. In its order, the district court declined to resentence Poindexter but it did order the Probation Office to amend Poindexter’s presentenc e report to account for the fact that a prior New Jersey conviction had been vacated. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Poindexter’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the d istrict court. United States v. Poindexter , Nos. 3:97

- cr - 00079

- JCC

- 1; 3:11

- cv - 00175

- REP (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2011)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED