alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36417-36418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14417]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Third Party Collection 
program (Record of Other Health Insurance; DD Form 2569; OMB Number 
0704-0323.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Number of Respondents: 293,401.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 293,401.
    Average Burden Per Response: 2.5 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 12,030.
    Needs and Uses: The information contained in the DD Form 2569 will 
be used to collect reimbursement from private insurers for medical care 
provided to family members of retirees and decreased Service members 
having health insurance. This information is collected either during 
the inpatient stay admission and/or discharge process or during the 
visit when a patient presents for an outpatient procedure. 
Reimbursement will be used to enhance healthcare delivery in the 
Medical Treatment Facility (MTF). Information will also be used by the 
Military Health Services System and CHAMPUS Fiscal intermediaries to 
determine eligibility for care, deductibles, and copayments and by 
Health Affairs for program planning and management.

[[Page 36418]]

    Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
    Frequency: On occasion; annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Allison Eydt.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Eydt at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10235, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 24, 2000.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 00-14417 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-M
United States District Court

for the

Southern District of Florida

Centennial Bank, Plaintiff,

v.

M/V Why Not and Why Not I, LLC, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 22-22883-Civ-Scola

Order Adopting Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan 

Goodman for a report and recommendation on Plaintiff Centennial Bank’s 

motion to tax costs (ECF No. 38). Judge Goodman issued a report, 

recommending that the Court grant Centennial’s motion to tax costs in its 

entirety and award Centennial $159,435.99. (Rep. & Recs., ECF No. 47.) No 

objections have been filed and the time to object has passed. Irrespective of the 

lack of objections, the Court has considered Judge Goodman’s report on a de 

novo basis and finds it cogent and compelling.

Accordingly, the Court affirms and adopts Judge Goodman’s report and 

recommendations (ECF No. 47) and grants Centennial’s motion to tax costs

(ECF No. 38). Consistent with the report, the Court awards $159,435.99 in 

taxable costs to Centennial Bank, to be paid by Defendants M/V Why Not and 

Why Not I, LLC.

Done and ordered at Miami, Florida on November 2, 2023.

_______________________________

Robert N. Scola, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 1:22-cv-22883-RNS Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/03/2023 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION 

RUDOLPH BETANCOURT, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 CASE NO.: 0:22-cv-61728-AMC 

v.

PALLAR, L.C. and 

EPIC RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., 

d/b/a OCEANS 234, 

 Defendants. 

______________________________________/ 

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, RUDOLPH BETANCOURT, (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, 

PALLAR, L.C. and EPIC RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., d/b/a OCEANS 234

(“collectively referred to herein as “Defendants”), (collectively, “the Parties”), 

through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to the dismissal with 

prejudice of the above-captioned action, with each party to bear their own fees and 

costs except as otherwise set out in the settlement agreement between the parties. 

Dated: March 16, 2023. 

 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Glenn R. Goldstein 

Glenn R. Goldstein

Case 0:22-cv-61728-AMC Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/16/2023 Page 1 of 3
2 

Florida Bar No. 55873 

Glenn R. Goldstein & Associates, PLLC

8101 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 504 

Miami, FL 33138 

Telephone: (305) 900-2373 

Email: GGoldstein@G2Legal.net

/s/ Lauren N. Wassenberg 

Lauren N. Wassenberg 

Florida Bar No. 34083 

Lauren N. Wassenberg & Associates P.A. 

1825 NW Corporate Blvd., Suite 110 

Boca Raton, FL 33431

Telephone: (561) 571-0646 

Email: WassenbergL@gmail.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/s/ Kevin D. Johnson 

Kevin D. Johnson 

Florida Bar No. 0013749 

Christopher M. Bentley 

Florida Bar No. 0052616 

JOHNSON JACKSON PLLC 

100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 2310 

Tampa, FL 33602 

Telephone: (813) 580-8400 

Facsimile: (813) 580-8407 

Email: kjohnson@johnsonjackson.com 

cbentley@johnsonjackson.com 

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 0:22-cv-61728-AMC Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/16/2023 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing was filed on March 16, 2023 using 

the CM/ECF system, a copy of which will be sent electronically to all parties of 

record.

 /s/ Kevin D. Johnson 

Attorney

Case 0:22-cv-61728-AMC Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/16/2023 Page 3 of 3
Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital

and Dartmouth Centers for Health and Aging

Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year grant are to:

• Goal 1: Through robust partnerships, 

develop a result-based, comprehensive 

strategy for reducing falls and falls risk 

among older adults and adults with 

disabilities living in the community; and

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in evidence-based falls 

prevention programs, while concurrently 

pursuing the sustainability of these 

programs beyond the end of the grant 

period.

The Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital (MHMH) 

and Dartmouth Centers for Health and Aging 

(DCHA) and its partners will: 

• Develop a comprehensive and scalable 

strategy for reducing falls and falls risk 

among older adults and adults with 

disabilities; and

• Increase the number of older adults and 

adults with disabilities who participate in

evidence-based falls prevention 

programs, while concurrently ensuring 

sustainability of these programs beyond 

the grant period.

Proposed Interventions

• A Matter of Balance (AMOB)

• Tai Ji Quan: Moving for Better Balance®

(TJQMBB)

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, MHMH and 

DCHA will collaborate with the following key 

partners:

• Baystate Geriatric Workforce 

Enhancement Program

• CareLink Rhode Island

• Dartmouth Hitchcock Health

• Granite YMCA

• Greater Springfield Senior Services, Inc.

• New Hampshire Falls Risk Reduction Task 

Force

• Serenity PACE

• University of Rhode Island Geriatric 

Workforce Enhancement Program
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

Anticipated Results 

The MHMH and DHCA and its partners propose 

to achieve the following results: 

• Engage 927 participants in AMOB and 

TJQMBB in three states through the NHHUB;

• Establish a referral pathway from primary 

care to community-based falls risk 

reduction programming in six primary 

care sites in New Hampshire, 

Massachusetts, and Rhode Island; 

• Conduct at least 18 falls prevention 

trainings (including six TJQMBB instructor 

trainings, at least six TJQMBB enhanced 

trainings, and six implementation 

trainings for TJQMBB and AMOB program 

leaders); and

• Implement at least 10 DartmouthHitchcock Health, Massachusetts and 

Rhode Island TJQMBB programs that will 

be sustained beyond the grant period. 

Contact:

Ellen Flaherty, PhD 

Co-Director, Dartmouth Centers for Health and

Aging

Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth

Section of General Internal Medicine-Geriatrics

ellen.flaherty@hitchcock.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
Partners in Care Foundation

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

1 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

Goals, Strategies, and Activities

The overall purposes of the 3-year “Integrated 

Networks to Deliver and Sustain Evidence-Based 

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education 

Programs” grants are to:

• Goal 1: Strengthen integrated state or 

regional networks that address the social 

and behavioral determinants of health of 

older adults and adults with disabilities.

• Goal 2: Significantly increase the number 

of older adults and adults with disabilities 

who participate in chronic disease selfmanagement education and selfmanagement support programs.

Partners in Care Foundation (PICF) and its 

partners will: 

• Strengthen and expand the Partners at 

Home delivery network;

• Significantly increase participation in 

evidence-based chronic disease selfmanagement education (CDSME) 

programs;

• Implement social determinants of health 

initiatives targeting food security, 

transportation, and loneliness; and

• Pursue opportunities for ongoing 

program sustainability. 

Proposed Interventions

• Arthritis Foundation Exercise Program

• Chronic Disease Self-Management 

Program

• Chronic Pain Self-Management Program

• Diabetes Self-Management Program

• HomeMeds

• Programa Manejo Personal de la 

Diabetes

• Tomando Control de su Salud

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, PICF will 

collaborate with the following key partners:

• California Department of Aging

• California Department of Public Health

• California Healthier Living Coalition

• Camarillo Health Care District

• Dignity Health Mercy & Memorial 

Hospitals

• Kaweah Delta Health Care District

• Lake County Tribal Health Consortium

• Meals on Wheels Orange County

• On Lok Day Services

• San Diego County Aging and Independent 

Services
2 of 2

Prevention and Public Health Fund 2020, effective August 1, 2020

• Saint Agnes Medical Center

• State and local food access partners (i.e. 

Food banks, Supplemental Nutrition 

Access Programs, food pantries, etc.)

Anticipated Results

PICF and its partners propose to achieve the 

following results: 

• Engage 5,346 participants in CDSME

workshops, with a 75% completion rate;

• Provide HomeMeds and the Arthritis 

Foundation Exercise Program to 1,173 

participants;

• Develop 18 wellness clubs to foster 

continued participation in health 

education activities; and

• Secure three payer contracts to sustain 

program implementation.

Contact:

Dianne Davis

Partners in Care Foundation

ddavis@picf.org

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov
NUMBER 13-13-00612-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ROBERT MICHAEL ARTEAGA, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

On appeal from the 424th District Court

of Burnet County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE BRIEF

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This appeal was transferred to this Court from the Third Court of Appeals by order 

of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.220(a) (West, Westlaw 

through 2013 3d C.S.) (delineating the jurisdiction of appellate courts); TEX. GOV'T CODE 

ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (granting the supreme court the 
2

authority to transfer cases from one court of appeals to another at any time that there is 

“good cause” for the transfer). This cause is before the Court on the State’s third motion 

for extension of time to file the brief in this matter. The State’s brief in this matter was 

originally due on March 26, 2014. The State has previously requested and received two 

extensions of time to file the brief. 

The Court, having fully examined and considered the extensions previously 

granted in this cause, is of the opinion that the State’s motion for extension of time should 

be granted with order. 

Accordingly, we GRANT the State’s third motion for extension of time and ORDER 

the State to file its brief on or before August 11, 2014. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS 

WILL BE GRANTED IN THIS MATTER. The Court looks with disfavor on the delay 

caused by the State’s failure to timely file a brief in this matter. The Clerk of this Court is 

ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on the State.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

7th day of August, 2014.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                         RELM Wireless Corporation


                                         /s/ David P. Storey
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         David P. Storey
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
May 4, 2005
Exhibit 23.1



Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent



We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Advaxis, Inc. on Form S-3 [File No. 333-226988] and
Form S-8 [File Nos. 333-130080, 333-217218, 333-222483, and 333-223851] of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph
as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, dated December 20, 2019, with respect to our audits of the financial
statements of Advaxis, Inc. as of October 31, 2019 and 2018 and for each of the two years in the period ended October 31,
2019, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advaxis, Inc. for the year ended October 31, 2019.



|/s/
    Marcum llp   | 
|-------------------- | 
|                     | 
|Marcum
    llp       | 
|New
    York, NY     | 
|January
    21, 2020 |
#### § 143.100 Applicability.

This subpart applies to OCS facilities except mobile offshore drilling units.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10
- 21
- 00069
- CR IN RE WILLIAM CHARLES WEBB

From the 54 th District Court McL ennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012
- 678
- C2
Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this original proceeding, relator, William Charles Webb, complains about the trial court’s purported refusal to rule on his January 8, 2021 Chapter 64 motion for DNA testing. 1 Relator has filed two other matters that are related to this one

— appellate cause

1 Relator also appears to request that we order the trial court to grant his January 8, 2021 Chapter 64 motion for DNA testing. We cannot do so. See State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana , 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (stating that an appellate court can only compel a trial court to rule on a pending motion by writ of mandamus; it cannot compel the trial court to rule in a certain way).In re Webb Page 2

numbers 10

- 18

- 00170

- CR and 10

- 20

- 00292

- C R. Both of these matters are still pending in
this Court. In any event, w e abate d and remanded appellate cause numbers 10

- 18

- 00170

- CR
and 10

- 20

- 00292

- CR to the trial court to locate relator’s prior Chapter 64 motion for DNA testing filed on May 2, 2018 , among other things . In its order in response to our abatement
order , the trial co urt indicated that relator’s May 2, 2018 Chapter 64 motion for DNA testing ha s been lost, but that relator’s January 8, 2021 Chapter 64 motion for DNA testing is an accurate copy of the May 2, 2018 motion

. On May 7, 2018, the trial court originally
denied relator’s May 2, 2018 motion. Moreover , o n March 5, 2021, the trial court adopted its prior May 7, 2018 order denying relator relief under Chapter 64. Accordingly, because the effect of the trial court’s March 5, 2021 order was to deny relator’s January 8, 2021 Chapter 64 motion for DNA testing, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in this appellate cause number for want of jurisdiction

. 2

JOHN E. NEILL Justice

2 We further note that our holding in this case is limited to relator’s complaint about the trial court’s purported refusal to rule on his January 8, 2021 Chapter 64 motion for DNA testing. We do not address the propriety of the denial of relator’s Chapter 64 motion in this proceeding. Moreover, in light of our disposition, we dismiss as moot all other pending motions in this matter.In re Webb Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray Justice Neill, and Senior Justice Scoggins 3 Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed May 19, 2021 Do not publish [OT06]

3 The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"ADRA 1996 CONTENTS","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FjbyTfY9g0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/adra1996\/\">ADRA 1996 CONTENTS<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/adra1996\/embed\/#?secret=FjbyTfY9g0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ADRA 1996 CONTENTS” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"FjbyTfY9g0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
§ 401.7 Fenders. ( a ) Where any structural part of a vessel protrudes so as to endanger Seaway installations, the vessel shall be equipped with only horizontal permanent fenders— ( 1 ) That are made of steel, are of a thickness not exceeding 15 cm, with well tapered ends, and are located along the hull, close to the main deck level; and
( 2 ) On special application, portable fenders, other than rope hawsers, may be allowed for a single transit if the portable fenders are— ( i ) Made of a material that will float; and
( ii ) Securely fastened and suspended from the vessel in a horizontal position by a steel cable or a fiber rope in such a way that they can be raised or lowered in a manner that does not damage Seaway installations.
( b ) Tires shall not be used as fenders.
( c ) On special application, vessels of unusual design may be permitted to utilize permanent fenders not greater than 30 cm in thickness.
[61 FR 19551, May 2, 1996, as amended at 70 FR 12970, Mar. 17, 2005; 74 FR 18994, Apr. 27, 2009; 85 FR 15950, Mar. 20, 2020; 88 FR 14267, Mar. 8, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.126 Pumps. ( a ) Crude oil must be supplied to the COW machines by COW system pumps or cargo pumps.
( b ) The pumps under paragraph (a) of this section must be designed and arranged with sufficient capacity to meet the following: ( 1 ) A sufficient pressure and flow is supplied to allow the simultaneous operation of those COW machines designed to operate simultaneously.
( 2 ) If an eductor is used for tank stripping, enough driving fluid is provided by the pumps to allow the eductor to meet § 157.128(a).
( c ) There must be means on the tank vessel to maintain the pressure under paragraph (b) of this section when shore terminal back pressure is less than the pressure under paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The COW system must have two or more pumps that are capable of supplying oil to the COW machines.
( e ) The COW system must be designed to meet the requirements of this subpart with any one pump not operating.
§ 20.203 Unavailability. ( a ) If an ALJ cannot perform the duties described in § 20.202 or otherwise becomes unavailable, the Chief ALJ shall designate a successor.
( b ) If a hearing has commenced and the assigned ALJ cannot proceed with it, a successor ALJ may. The successor ALJ may, at the request of a party, recall any witness whose testimony is material and disputed, and who is available to testify again without undue burden. The successor ALJ may, within his or her discretion, recall any other witness.