TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMMARY 

(Submit separate summary sheet for each pollutant test report) 

RECEIVED 

MAY 272009 

IS 

Submit to: ISMP Database 

Ross Winne, Program Manager 

Industrial Souree Monitoring Program 

4144 International Parkway, Suite 120 

•.•.. 1.4.11'. !!9J~~l!1! ll!'!!lr!! .l1..s.f!!..f!.1J) •••••• 

No. 

. Atlanta, GA 30354 

MARTA - Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility 

Facility Name: ----___ ---------------------------

1600 Perry Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 

Facility Address: ___ =..._--------------:::-:-------:;:,.....------- Addresa City Zlp 

Facility Contact,:,.: ___ D~aV1:.::·d:..:Ch=an::.:d::.:le:::..r ______ _ Phone No. (404) 739-96S0 

PART A 

Emission Point (one on1y): Compressor Engine No.1 (Emission Unit ID No. PBO 1) - Stack No. SOO 1 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ PoJiutant (one only): __________________ Date test performed: 412=812.::,00=9 __ _ 

Applicable Rule(s); Regu1atioD(s) or Permit Conditions·;.,.,.gS.l&ljtC::ii::W1~·~dc .... TI.l.WJtJe .... V:L.a;ML\:IScJ...T",,2S.L.tp~): ___________ _ 

Operating capacity during test: 1,150 RPM (Run ID Ul-l) 

-------------------------------------------- Computed allowable emission rate(s) or limitation(s): .... ~----::"7--:-----:--:------------­ (Determined for each applicable tule. regulation or permit condition using same units) 

Reported emissions to atmosphere: . O.1711bs/hr. (0.75 tpy) (In same units as rule. regUlation or:-:pe=nn:'!it:-:co::::n==arniti~·on=)F~.;.;..;....;:;.:..:..-----------------

The test report should include a compilation of all CEMS. data, control devise parameters and 

proc::ess operating data related to the test. 

PARTB 

For any facility operating. under a Part 70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 of that permit requires the 

following certification sbould be signed by a responsible official and ineluded witb the report: 

I certify that based on my Information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and information in this report are true, aecurate, and complete. 

Wendell Dallas lJoJJJAJ)JL V.P., G.M., AGLC 

NAME SIGNATURE TITLE 

Rev. 05130106 

.' 
TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMMARY 

(Submit separate summary sheet for each pollutant test report) 

RECEIVED 

MAY 27 Z009 

ISMP 

Submit to: ISMP Database 

Ross Winne, Program Manager 

Industrial Source Monitoring Program 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

• _ •.• L4.l!. fr!J!¥f!{0.l1 !!~cJ!. !!~f! P",!ly). _. __ • 

No. 9..00 

MARTA - Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural Oas Fueling Facility 

F~illiyNmne:----~------------------------------------------------------

1600 Pert)' Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 

Facility Address: ___ -,..,..--________________ ~----=_--------

Add..... City Zip 

Facility Contact'!...· ____ ...;D:;,a:::.;:v:t:.:.;·d;..,;Chan=;;;;d::,::le;;.,f _________ _ Phone No. (404) 739~96S0 

PART A 

Emission Point (one only}: Compressor Engine No.1 (Emission Unit ID No. PBOI) - S~k No. SOO 1 

carbon Monoxide (CO) 

Pollutant (one onJy):--------------------------Date test perfonned: 4n.=8n..:;O:;.:O:.;;.9 __ _ 

Applicable Rule(s). Regulation(s) or Pennit COnditions; ... Slil.ljt~C:i:.Iw:u;ldw;ei..lTUlitWilei..JVwM~ST.I....I.j,l OOl!oU.ltpq.)!-----_________ _ 

Maximum expected operating cap~ity: ____ l:..;!l.;..SO_RP...;;...;..M.;..(Run::;;.;..;...;.,,;ID~U_l...;.l)"__ _____________ _ 

Operating capacity during test: 1,150 RPM (Run ID UI-I) 

Computed allowable emission rate(s) or limitation(s)_' __ ~-_------_-----------­

(Determined for each applicable rule., regulation Of permit condition usin, same units) 

lqlorted emissions to atmosphere:==:-=O~.01'!:3~g ~lbr-sJbr __ ( .... O_.l_7 ..&tpL.!y)'---________________ _ 

(In same units as rule, regulation OT pennlt condition) 

The test report should include a compilation of all CEMS data, control devise parameters and 

process operating data related to the test. 

PARTB 

For any facility operating under a Part 70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 oUhat permit requires the 

following certification should be signed by a responsible official and included with the report: 

I certify that based on my information and belieffonned after reasonable inqnlry, the statements 

and information in this report are true, accurate, and complete. 

Wendell Dallas 

~1MW.J>JL V.P., G.M., AGLC 

NAME SIGNATURE TITLE 

Rev, 05130/06 
( TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMMARY 

(Submit separate summary sheet for each poUutant test report) 

RECEIVED 

MAY 272009 

ISMP 

Submit to: ISMP Database 

Ross Winne, Program Manager 

Industrial Source Monitoring Program 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

•••. _f~}!.!!!'!~'!l!: fl.!f!!ll'.:;! !!'f.~p'.'!lyJ •••••• 

No. 

MARTA - Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility 

FacilityNarnc: ---------------------------------

1600 Perry Boulevard. NW Atlanta 30318 

Pacility Address: __ ~:---------------~----:;;:_------- IuId1as City Zip 

Facility Contact:;..' __ ...;D:::;;a::,::v1..:;:·d:,,;:Chan=::.::d:,:::ler:.:...-______ _ Phone No. (404) 739-9650 

fARTA 

Emission Point (one only): Compressor Engine No.1 (Emission Unit 10 No. PBOl) - Stack No. SOOI 

Nitrogen Oxides (No..) Pollutant (one ouly): __________________ Date test performed: 4:.:12~812.:;.O:.:O~9 __ _ 

Applicable RuIe{s), R.egulation(s) or Permit Conditions : ... .... S~Ite-)I;;;w.u.I&.W· dH..C T,.\.ji~de"'-y~MIoIiIS .. T .. 2Sol..tplo,w:.y __________ _ 

Maximum expected operating capacity: __ l ..... & ... O_O_RP_M~(R.un ____ ID_U_l._M) _______________ _ 

Operating capacity during test 1,800 RPM (Rnn ID Ut-M) 

Computed allowable emission rate(s) orlimitation(s): ____________________ _ 

(Determined for each applicable rule. regulation or permit condition using same units) 

~orted emissions to atmosphere:~=:-=O~.SJ!:3~2~lb~sIh-r-. (.;:..2_.3_3..:,tp""'y)=--_______________ _ 

(In same units as rute, regulation or permit Cliidition) 

The test report should include a compUation of aU CEMS data, control devise parameters and 

process operating data related to the test. 

PARTB 

For any facility operating under a Part 70 Permit, Coudition 8.8.3 of that permit requires the 

following certification should be signed by a responsible official and included with the report: 

I certify that based on my information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and Information In this report are true, accurate, and complete. 

Wendell Dallas bloUJ.{])Jh V.P., G.M., AGLC slzy 1'5 

NAME SIGNATURE TITLE DATE 

Rev. 05/3Qf06 
(ee 

\ 

TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUM:.MARY 

(Submit separate summary sheet for each pollutant test report) 

RECEIVED 

MAY 272009 

ISMP 

Submit to: ISMP Database 

Ross Winne, Program :Manager 

Industrial Source Monitoring Program 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

. _____ (~}!..f!!J!!ffi()llfl.!f!!.r_c..~_~l!.!1l!I]L. __ _ 

No. .YJ 

MARTA- Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural OasFueling Facility 

F~RyNmne: ------------------------------------------------------------

1600 Perry Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 

Facility Address: ___ ~~---------------------__:::~---__::::--------- Address Cil.)' Zip 

Facility Contact:...: _____ D::.a::.:v~id:..;Ch=and=ler::=._ _________ _ Phone No. (404) 739-9650 

PART A 

Emission Point (one only): Compressor Engine No.1 (Emission Unit ID No. PBO I) - Stack No. sao 1 

Carbon Monoxide (CO) Pollutant (one only): ___________________ -Date test perfonned: 41U=12.::0:.::0~9 __ _ 

Applicable Rule(s), R.egulation(s) or Pennit Conditions_: ~S!tIoUiC::i::.lwlx.&iwde .... TUAitJl.\Iic .... VL..M=ST.&_Ul ooa.t..lltp~X~--_----------

Maximum expected operating capacity:_ ....... l.,g_OO.;..RP;.;.;;...;M~(Rnn=_ID;;.....;;;.U..;;.l-.;..M)~ ________________ _ 

Operating capacity during test 1,800 RPM (Run 1D Ul-M) 

Computed allowable emission rate(s) or limitation(s) : .... ____________________ _ 

(Detc:nnined for each applicable rule. regulation or pennit condition using same units) 

Reported emissions to atmosphere:~='l::"'!"=.'I::_:.4!!:2:!':lb:"::'s/hr__r ..... (6_.22--.jtp:..:;y ..... ) ________________ _ (In same units as rule, Rigulation or permit condition) 

The test report .honld include a compBation of all CEMS data, control devise parameters and 

process operating data related to the test. . 

PARTB 

For any facility operating under a Part 70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 of that permit requires the 

following certification should be signed by a responsible official and induded with the report: 

I certify that based on my information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and information in this report are true, accurate, and complete. 

Wendell Dallas LJPMhl1:J):1L. V.P., G.M., AGLC 

NAME SIGNATURE TITLE 

Rev. 05/30106 
TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMMARY 

(Submit separate summary sheet for each pollutant test report) 

RECEIVED 

MAY 2 7 2009 

ISMP 

Submit to: ISMP Database 

Ross Winne, Program Manager 

Industrial Source Monitoring Program 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

••••• f~}!.frP.~{(]l! 1!~!'..cJ!.!!:s..I!!1..1J.lpL •••• 

No. 0 

MARTA - Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility 

Facility Name: 

1600 PenyBoulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 

Facility Address: 

Address Cil), Zip 

Facility Contact: David Chandler PboneNo. (404) 739-9650 

PART A 

Emission Point (one only): Compressor Engine No.2 (Emission Unit 1D No. PB02) - Stack No. S002 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ 

PoJlutant (one only):------------------Date test performed: 4/2.8=12.:,;0:;.:::0_9 __ _ 

Applicable Rule(s1 R.egulation(s) or PermIt COnditions· ......... S....,jtc="";m""'· ... de .... Tj"""""'tle .... v"'-'of;MST ........... 2S .. tp~y __________ _ 

Maximum expected operating capacity: __ l_..1_S_0_RP_M.......;(R_Wl_ID_U_2_-I)"--______________ _ 

Operating capacity during test: 1,150 RPM (Run lD U2-I) 

Computed allowable emission rate(s) Or limitation(s:) .... · ____________________ _ 

(Detennined for each applicable rule. regulation or pennit condition using same units) 

Reported emissions to atmosphere:"=-==::-=O~.7ri:3:!::4_::;lbrslhr.;.;.;.;... <.::;;.3.;.;;..22.;.;...;:;tp..::"y)'--_______________ _ 

(In same units as rule, regulation or pettiiit condition) 

The test report should include a compilation or aU CEMS data, control devise parameters and 

process operating data related to the test. 

PARTB 

For any facDity operating under a Part 70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 of that permit requires the 

following certification should be signed by a responsible official and included with the report: 

I certify that based on my information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and information in this report are true, accurate, and complete. . 

WendeD Dallas 

~1~ V.P., G.M.,AGLC 

NAME SIGNATURE TITLE 

~ \ 

Rev.05J3OJOe 
TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SU.MMARY 

(Submit separate summary sbeet for each pollutant test report) 

RECEIVED 

MAY 272009 

ISMP 

Submit to: ISMP Database 

Ross Winne, Program Manager 

industrial Source Monitoring Program 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, GA 303S4 

MARTA - Perry Boulevard Compressed Natura1 Gas Fueling Facility 

Facility Name: 

1600 PerT)' Boulevard. NW Atlanta 30318 

Facility Address: Addn:ss City ZIp 

Facility Contact: David Chandler Phone No. (404) 739-9650 

PART A 

Emission Point (one only): Compressor Engine No.2 (Emission Unit ID No. PB02) - Stack No. S002 

Carbon Monoxide (CO) Pollutant (one only): __________________ Date test performed: 4:.::128.,.12,;:,00::;.;..:;.,9 __ _ 

Applicable Rule(s). Regulation{s) or Pennit COnditioIlS·_S~j~te""'-Wl"""· d .... e .... Ti""it .... Je..... V ..... M"""""ST ......... l OOl.loUjtp""')! __________ _ 

Maximum expected operating eapacity:_--..;l~.l;..;;.SO_RP....;;;...;.M~(Rnn ........ _ID_U2- ........ ~I) _______________ _ 

Operating capacity dtuing test: 1,150 RPM (Run ID U2-1) 

Computed allowable emission rate(s) or limitation(s): _____________________ _ 

(Determined for each applicable rule, resuJation or pennit condition using same units) 

Reported emissions to atmosphere: 8.85 Ibslhr . (38.16 tpy) Qn same units as rule, IeguIation or~pe~nn='!:it~co~n~dil'!::ttr.:"on='l)~~-""""""-----------------

The test report should include a eompRation of all CEMS data,oontrol devise parameters and 

process operating data related to the test. 

EARTB 

For any facility operating under a Part 70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 of that permit requires the 

following certification should be signed by a responsible official and included with the report: 

I certify that based on my information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and information in this report are true, accurate, and eomplete. 

Wendell Dallas iliMll:DdL V.P., G.M., AGLC s/~loc, NAME SIGNATURE TITLE DATE 

Rev. 05130106 

I 

I 
Submit to: 

TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMl\1ARY 

(Submit separate summary sheet for each pollutant test report) 

Ross Winne, Program Manager 

Industrial Source Monitoring Program 

4244 International Parkway, Suite llO 

Atlanta, GA 30354 .. 

MARTA - Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility 

Facility Name: 

RECEIVED 

MAY 272009 

"viP 

1600 Perry Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 

Facility Address: 

Addrcsl CII), Zip 

Facility Contact: David Chandler Phone No. (404) 739-9650 

PART A 

Emission Point (one only): Compressor ~e No.3 (Emission Unit ID No. PS03) - Stack No. 8003 

Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ 

Pollutant (oneonly):------------------Date test perfunned: 412=812,::;;00=.9 __ _ 

AppIicable Rule(s), Regulation(s) or Permit Conditions_' · ... sw.:ite-IO::W'I;u,·""de.T.A.lilioli tle ... .lC....U:wS-.&.T-"'25..z..tpy~ __________ _ 

Maximum expected operating capacity: __ l....:;.1_S_O ... RPM __ ~(Ru;;..;.....;.n ... ID;;..;.....;.U_3_-I)'--______________ _ 

Operating capacity during test: 1,150 RPM (Run ID m-I) 

Computed allowable emission ntte(sTor Iimitation{s): ... __ --:-_-:-__ -. ____________ _ 

(Detennined for each applica.ble role, regulation or pennit condition using same wits) 

Reported emissions to atmosphere:~==:!:=-=2:::::.1r.:7rilb='slhrr__ • ..;;.(9-.S-1~tpy~) ________________ _ (In same wits as rule, regulation or penntt colidition) 

The test report should include a compilation of all CEMS data, control devise parameters and 

process operating data related to the test. 

PARTB 

For any facility operating under a Part 70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 of that permit requires the 

foUowing certification should be signed by a responsible official and included with the report: 

I certify that based on my information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and information In this report are true, accurate, and complete. 

Wendell Dallas 

~1JJL V.P., GM., AGLC 

NAME SIGNATURE TITLE 

Rev.05J30106 
TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMMARY 

(Submit separate summary sheet for each pollutant test report) 

RECEIVED 

MAY 272009 

ISMP 

Submit to: ISMP Database 

Ross Winne, Program Manager 

Industrial Source Monitoring Program 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

_____ !dlt_ft!l!'!f!{o-':_l}~_cf!!!~liP_'W~_ ••••• 

No. 

MARTA - Peny Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility 

FacllityName: ------------------------------

1600 Perry Boulevard. NW Atlanta 30318 

Facility Address: __ ~~-------------~~---__::."------- A<I<Iru> Cit)' Zip 

FacllityCo~~' ___ ~D~~~w~crum~~d_Ie_r ______ ___ Phone No. (404) 739·9650 

PART A 

Emission Point (one only): Compressor Engine No.3 (Emission Unit ID No. PB03) - Stack No. S003 

Carbon Monoxide (CO) 

Pollutant (one on}y):-----........ --------'------Date test performed: 412=8/2:.;0:;..;09~ __ _ 

Applicable RuJe(s). Reglllation(s) or Permit Conditions_' .... Si.... te=""'WJ .... ·d .... e .... Tj ..... t.... le....,V'-'MS=T ........ l00~tp~)! __________ _ 

Maximum expected operating capacity: __ l_..l_50_RP_M ..... {Ru_n_ID_U_3.,..;l) _______________ _ 

Operating capacity during test: 1,150 RPM (Run ID U3-I) 

---------------------------------- Computed allowable emission rate(s) or limitation(s) : ..... ~_-________ ..:.----------

(Determined for each applicable role, regulation or permit condition using same units) 

Reported emissions to atmosphere: l.22lbslhr (5.34 tpy) (In same units as role, regulation or~p~e~rm~it~co~na!!o:it1~o~n}i:---~;....;...;;~-----------------

The test report should include a compilation of all CEMS data, control devise parameters and 

process operating data related to the test. 

PARTB 

For any facUity operating under a Part 70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 of that permit requires the 

following certification should be signed by a responsible official and included with the report: 

I certify that based on my information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and information in this report are trne, accurate, and complete. 

Wendell Dallas "\tv1..k J)J(,. V.P., G.M.,AGLC 

NAME SIGNATURE TITLE 

Rev. 05130/06 
TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMMARY 

(Submit separate summary sheet for each pollu.tant test report) 

RECEIVED 

MAY 27 20DR 

ISMP 

Submit to: ISMP Database 

Ross Winne, Program Manager 

Industrial Source Monitoring Program 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

•• ___ f.-1i! • .f'!!!!!f!:i..o.'11!!1J!l.c!!1!'.lLo..n../Y). ___ ._ 

No. () 

MARTA - Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility 

F~Ui~N~:--------------------------------------------~--------------

1600 Perry Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 

Facility Address: __ -"..,.,.---________________ ~------_-=------------

Address aty Zip 

Facility COntact::...-_~Da=VI.:;:·d;..;:Ch=an.:;:d1.:;:e;;..r __________ _ Phone No. (404) 739-9650 

rARTA 

Emission Point (one only): Compressor Engine No.3 (Emission Unit OJ No. PB03) - Stack No. 8003 

Nitrogen Oxides (NO,,) 

PoUutant (one only):--------------------------Date test perfOrmed: 4:::J2~912.:::;O~O~2 __ _ 

Applicable Rule(s). Regulation(s)or Pennit Conditions_' ,..\lSll.lliteii::-w.l:l'.iwde!ii..n..u.u:tle!ii..y.x....Q:M.wS~T""2"'-S .ljl'Dl,jC.y-------------

Maximum expected operating capacity:_~1~.8;..;.O_0.;.....RP.;.....M~(Ru...;;.;,,;,.n.;;;;m;..;.U3.;;..._.::M).....J.. _____________ _ 

Operating capaci~ during test: 1,800 RPM (Run ID Ul-M) 

Computed allowable emission rate(s) or limitation(s): _____________________ ....... ___ ~ __ _ 

(Determined for each applicable rule, regulation Ot' permit condition using same units) 

Reported emissions to atmospbere:~=r.:-:=1=::.1n::2.!:Ib='slhrr_.~(4-.9-1....ltp:.:.y"-) __________ --:-_____ _ 

(In same units as rule, regulation or permit condrtion) 

The test report should include a compilation of all CEMS data, control devise parameters and 

process operating data related to the test. 

PARTB 

For any facility operating under a Part 70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 of that permit requires the 

foRowing certification should be signed by a responsible official and included with the report: 

I certify that based on my information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and information in this report are true, acc:urate, and complete. 

Wendell Dallas ~.})JL V.P., G.M., AGLC 

NAME SIGNATURE TITLE 

Rev. 05130106 
/-

'. 

TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMMARY 

(Submit separate summary sheet for each pollutant test report) 

RECEIVED 

MAY 27 ?I)Q9 

Submit to: ISMP Database 

Ross Winne, Program Manager 

Industrial Source Monitoring Program 

4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

••• _.f~}!_l'!P!'E!.ip.ll!!!IJ!Z..C!!J!.s.e;.!!-,!Ij) •••• __ 

No. 

MARTA - Pen:y Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility 

F~W~Name:------------------------------------------------------------- 1600 Perry Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 

Facility Address: __ ~=~ ______________ .....,:~ _____ --:;:~ _____ _ Address City Zip 

F~ilU;y Contact,:...: __ -=:D::,:8vi:,::d:.,;C:::;:h::an::::d::::le:;:,.r _______ _ Phone No. (404) 739-9650 

PART A 

Bmission Point (one only): ComPressor Engine No.3 (Emission Unit In No. PBOl) - Stack No. S003 

Carbon Monoxide (CO) Pollutant (one onJy}: _______________________ Date test performed: ,412=9120=0;.:;.9 ____ _ 

. Applicable Rule(s), Regulation(s) or Permit COndjtions·_Slil.ljt.Uie-~wufd ... e'_lTl.l.ljt"'"leo..ly'_'MioJ;I.IiI.ST.Io...I.I10Ilo.lQ.Ioltp~y_-------------

Maximum expected operating capacU;y: __ l.:.,.B .... OO_RP_M ........ (Ru ........ n.... ID ........ Ul_ ..... M) ...... _______________ _ 

Operating capacity during test: 1,800 RPM (Run JD Ul-M) 

Computed allowabJe emission rate(s) or limitation(s)' ____________________ _ 

(Determined for each applicable rule. regulation or permit condition using same units) 

Reported emissions to atmosphere:~=:_=.0::'.l.40ift5~lbF_s/hr~(~1.;.;.77 .... 1py=)=-----__ ---------~­ (In same units as rule, regulation or permit condition) 

The test report should include a compilation of all CEMS data,' control devise parameters and 

process operating data related to the test. 

PARTB 

For any facUity operating under a Part 70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 of that permit requires the 

following certification should be signed by a responsible official and included with the report: 

I certify that based on my Information and belief fanned after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and information in this report are true, accurate, and complete. 

Wendell Dallas V.P., G.M., AGLC 

b~l1]:)JL SIGNATURE sl-u. /r!f. 

NAME TITLE DATE 

Rev,05l30J06 
! \ .. CTRC RECEIVED 

MAY 272009 

ISMp· 

AIR EMISSION TEST PROGRAM 

TRC PROJECT NO: 

TESTDATE: 

TYPE OF TESTS: 

TEST LOCATION: 

TEST SITE: 

COUNTY: 

TRC CONTA CT: 

166419 

April 28 -29, 2009 

Performance Tesung for Oxygen, Carbon 

Dioxide, Volumetric Flow Rate, Nitrogen Oxides, 

and Carbon Monoxide 

Thref! Reciprocaung Internal Combustion Engines 

Atlanta Gas Light Company 

MARTA Perry Boulevard Facility 

Natural Gas Compressor Station 

1600 Perry Qoulevard, NW 

Atlanta, Georgla 30318 

Fulton County 

Kenneth R. Loder 

Principal Scienust 

919-256-6239 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

SECTION PAGE 

1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 

2 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ...................................................................................... 2-1 

2.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................ 2-1 

2.2 SAMPIlN"G ANOMALIES ..................................................................................... 2-1 

2.2.1 CO Analyzer Operating Range .................................................................... 2-1 

2.2.2 NOx Analyzer Operating Range .................................................................. 2-1 

2.2.3 Aborted Run ................................................................................................. 2-2 

3 SOURCE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................... 3-1 

3.1 SOURCE DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................... 3-1 

3.2 REFERENCE METHOD SAMPLING LOCATIONS ........................................... 3-2 

4 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES .......................................................... 4-1 

4.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................ 4-1 

4.2 EPA METHOD 1 (SAMPLING POINTS) .............................................................. 4-1 

4.3 EPA METHOD 2 (VOLUMETRIC FWW} ........................................................... 4-2 

4.4 EPA METHOD 4 (FLUE GAS MOISTURE} ......................................................... 4-2 

4.5 INSTRUMENTAL TESTING (02. CO2• NOx AND CO} ...................................... 4-2 

4.5.1 SaIllple Collection ........................................................................................ 4·2 

4.5.2 Analyzer Descriptions ................................................................................. 4-3 

4.5.3 Calibration and Results ................................................................................ 4-5 

5 QAlQC PROCEDURES AND RESULTS .......................................................................... 5~1 

5.1 GENERAL ................................................................................................................ 5-1 

5.2 BAROMETER ......................................................................................................... 5-1 

5.3 PITOT TUBES ......................................................................................................... 5-2 

5.4 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE INDICATORS ....................................................... 5-2 

5.5 THERMOCOUPLES AND DIGITAL INDICATORS .......................................... 5~2 

5.6 CALffiRATION METER AND METERING SYSTEM ....................................... 5-2 

5.8 POST-TEST CALffiRATION CHECK .................................................................. 5-3 

5.7 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM QAlQC .......................... 5-3 

5.8 DATA REDUCTION ANDVALIDATION ........................................................... 5·3 

ii 
Table of Contents 

LIST OF TABLES 

TABLE TITLE PAGE 

Test Results Summaries 

2-1 Compressor Engine No. 1 ..................................................................................................... 2-2 

2-2 Compressor Engine No. 2 ..................................................................................................... 2-3 

2-3 Compressor Engine No.3 ................................................................................................ 2-4 

LIST OF APPENDICES 

APPENDIXA· FIELD DATA 

1. Method 1-4 data 

2. Raw CEM Data 

APPENDIX B CALIBRATION DATA 

1. M2-4 Calibration Docwnentation 

2. Site Specific Analyzer Checks 

3. Calibration Gas Certificates of Analysis 

4. Analyzer Performance Checks 

APPENDIX C PROCESS DATA 
-----

SECTION 1 

INTRODUCTION 

TRC Environmental Corporation (TRC) was contracted by Smith Aldridge, Inc. to conduct air 

emissions testing on three natural gas compressor engines (Caterpillar Model G3408-TAW) at the 

Atlanta Gas Light - MARTA Peny Boulevard Facility located in Atlanta, Georgia. These 

compressor engines are used in refueling compressed natural gas (eNG) public transportation buses 

and other city vehicles. The three compressor engines are commonly referred to as Engines I, 2, 

and 3 and are labeled as such in this report. The test program included the determination of effluent 

volumetric flow rate, oxygen (02), carbon dioxide (C02), nitrogen oxides (NOl() and carbon 

monoxide (CO). The test program's objective was to determine the NOx and CO emissions from 

the engines during normal operation and while at idle. The test program was conducted in 

accordance with the Test Plan submitted to Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 

Environmental Protection Division, Air Protection Branch (GA-DNR) and the revised test schedule 

specified by GA-DNR. 

Ken Loder and Matt Brooks ofTRC's Raleigh Air Measurement Group performed the test program 

on April 28 - 29,2009. Craig Smith of Smith Aldridge, LLC coordinated the test program and was 

assisted by David Chandler of the facility. Greg Preves of the facility oversaw the operation of the 

compressor engines during the test program. Frank Nederhand of the Georgia Department of 

Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, Air Protection Branch was present and 

observed the test program. 

A summary and discussion of the test results are provided in Section 2. The source description, test 

procedures and quality assurance activities are described in the subsequent sections. All supporting 

field data, analytical reports, and calibration records are provided in the appendices. 

1-1 
SECTION 2 

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS 

2.1 GENERAL 

TRC followed the procedures detailed in the test protocol with the revised sampling schedule as 

specified by GA-DNR. This program served as a follow up to an initial test program conducted on 

October 1- 2, 2008. One thirty-minute test run was conducted on all three engines while each 

engine was operating at an idle load condition and one sixty minute test run was conducted on 

engines I and 3 while each was operated at normal full load operating conditions. 

Tables 2-1, 2-2 and 2-3 summarize the results of the emission testing conducted on compressor 

engines No. I, 2 and 3, respectively. During testing each compressor engine was operated under 

normal full load at an RPM setting of approximately 1800 RPM. Atlanta Gas Light personnel 

monitored the operation of each engine throughout each test run and ensured they were operating 

properly. The operating temperatures of each of the Non Selective Catalytic Reduction (NSCR) 

units on each engine were observed during each test run and the facility recorded inlet and outlet 

gas temperatures of the catalyst during each test run. The facility collected process data collected 

during the test program is contained in Appendix C. 

Complete copies of the test results, field sampling data sheets, analytical data, and calibration data 

are presented in the appendices of this document. Process data collected by the facility is contained 

in Appendix C. 

2.2 SAMPLING ANOl\fALIES 

2.2.1 CO Analyzer Operating Range 

During the testing conducted on Engine No.2 at idle conditions, the average CO concentrations 

exceeded the upper span calibration standard (8,875 ppm CO) used to calibrate the CO analyzer. 

No data was truncated and the run average was valid, but technically the data doesn't meet the 

data validation criteria defined in Method 10. 

2.2.2 NOx Analyzer Operating Range 

During the testing conducted on Engine No.3 at idle conditions, the average NOx concentrations 

exceeded the upper span calibration standard (1,013 ppm NOx) used to calibrate the NOx 

analyzer. No data was truncated and the run average was valid, but technically the data doesn't 

meet the data validation criteria defined in Method 7E. 

2-1 
( 

• 

2.2.3 Aborted Run 

Section 2 

Summary of Test Results 

The initial Engine No. 1 nonnal full load test run was aborted after it was detennined the Engine 

was not operating properly. The engine operation was optimized and the test run was re-initiated 

and completed successfully. The data for the aborted run is included along with the raw CEM 

data in Appendix A-2. 

TABLE 2-1 

TESTRESULTSS~Y 

COMPRESSOR ENGINE NO.1 

ATLANTA GAS LIGHT COMPANY 

l\fARTA PERRY BOULEVARD FACILITY 

RunID UI-I UI-M 

Engine Operating Condition Idle Maximum 

Date 4/28/09 4128109 

Time 21:23 -21:52 22:49 - 23:48 

Run Duration, minutes 30 60 

Volumetric Flow Rate, DSCFH 12,675 23,162 

Moisture Content, %v H2O 15.15 19.35 

O2 Concentration, %vd 6.4 0.0 

CO2 Concentration, %vd 8.0 11.6 

NOx Concentration, ppmvd 112.7 192.3 

CO Concentration, ppmvd 41.1 845.3 

NOx Emissions, lblhr 0.171 0.532 

CO Emissions, Iblhr 0.038 1.42 

2-3 
TABLE 2-2 

TEST RESULTS SUl\fM:ARY 

COMPRESSOR ENGINE NO.2 

ATLANTA GAS LIGHT COMPANY 

MARTA PERRY BOULEVARD FACILITY 

RunID U2-J 

Engine Operating Condition Idle 

Date 4/28/09 

Time 18:38 -19:07 

Run Duration, minutes 30 

Volumetric Flow Rate, DSCFH \1\1(;. 11 905 , 

Moisture Content, %v H2O 19.84 

O2 Concentration, %vd 0.1 

CO2 Concentration, %vd 10.8 

NOx Concentration, ppmvd 516 

CO Concentration, ppmvd lO,224 

NOx Emissions, Iblhr 0.734 

CO Emissions, Iblbr 8.85 

2-4 

Section 2 

Summary 01 Test Results 
TABLE 2-3 

TEST RESULTS SUMMARY 

COMPRESSOR ENGINE NO.3 

Section 2 

Summary o/Test Results 

ATLANTA GAS LIGHT COMPANY 

MARTA PERRY BOULEVARD FACILITY 

RunID U3-1 U3-M 

Engine Operating Condition Idle Maximum 

Date 4/28/09 4/29/09 

Time 20:08 - 20:37 00:03 - 01:02 

Run Duration, minutes 30 60 

Volumetric Flow Rate, DSCFH 27,442 

Moisture Content, %v H2O 19.35 18.91 

O2 Concentration, %vd 0.3 0.0 

CO2 Concentration, %vd 11.3 11.6 

NOx Concentration, ppmvd 1,701 343 , 

CO Concentration, ppmvd 1,567 203 

NOx Emissions, Iblhr 2.17 1.12 

CO Emissions, Ib/hr 1.22 0.405 

2-5 
( SECTION 3 

SOURCE DESCRIPTION 

3.1 SOURCE DESCRIPTION 

The Atlanta Gas Light Company - MARTA Perry Boulevard Facility is a natural gas pipeline 

compressor station that is used to refill city of Atlanta public transportation buses and other city 

vehicles, such as police cars. The three natural gas compressor engines are Caterpillar Model 

G3408-TAW which is fueled off pipeline grade natural gas. Compressor Engine No.1 has a 

serial number of3WR00482, Engine No.2 serial number is 3WR00484 and Engine No.3 has a 

serial number of 3WR00483. The three engines share a common natural gas meter. The 

compressors are rich-bum engines that provide emissions reduction through the use of NSCR 

3-way converters that reduce the NOx, CO, and HC emissions. The engines are primarily 

operated during the late afternoon hours into the evening in order to refuel public transportation 

buses as needed. 

3.2 REFERENCE METHOD SAMPLING LOCATIONS 

Reference method sampling for volumetric flow rate, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, 

and carbon monoxide was conducted on each engine at the outlet of the catalyst bed. Each unit 

has a separate catalyst bed, which is located directly above the compressor engine. Each of the 

three engines had identical reference method sampling locations with two horizontal test ports 

installed 90 degrees apart located approximately 18 feet above grade. The internal diameter of 

each circular exhaust stack was 8 inches. TRC completed a Method 1 traverse point data sheet 

and sketch of the location, which is included with the field data sheets in Appendix A. TRC 

determined the closest upstream disturbance to be 2.62 diameters upstream of the sample port 

location and the closest downstream disturbance to be 2.3 7 diameters away. 
\, " 

c .. 

SECTION 4 

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

4.1 GENERAL 

All sampling and analytical procedures used in this test program were based on procedures 

published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These sampling and analytical 

procedures are contained in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A published by EPA. Copies of these 

methods are available from the EPA EMC electronic bulletin board or the Code of Federal 

Regulations. The test program was conducted according to the approved Georgia DNR test 

protocol submitted in advance ofthe testing. 

The TRC test team utilized the following EPA Reference Methods: 

Method 1 Sample and Velocity Traverse Point Locations 

Method 2 Determination of Volumetric Flow from Stationary Sources 

Method 3A Detennination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions 

from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) 

Method 4 Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases 

Method 7E Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources 

(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) 

Method 10 Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions. from Stationary Sources 

The gaseous compounds of this sampling - 02, C02, NOx, and CO - were collected using TRC's 

mobile continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS). 

4.2 EPA METHOD 1 (SAMPLING POINTS) 

The number and location of the sampling points were determined according to the procedures 

outlined in EPA Method 1. Eight (8) points were sampled along two (2) axes for a total of 

sixteen (16) points. A cyclonic flow determination was conducted during the test program and 

the effluent stream was found to meet the requirements of Method 1 for the absence of cyclonic 

flow. 

4-1 
i 

,. 

4.3 EPA METHOD 2 (VOLUMETRIC FLOW) 

Section 4 

Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

The velocity was determined according to the procedures outlined in EPA Method 2. Velocity head 

(delta P) measurements were made using a Type S Pitot tube confonning to the geometric 

specifications outlined in EPA Method 2 and having a coefficient of 0.84. Differential pressures 

were measured using a fluid manometer. Flue gas temperatures were measured using chromelalumel thermocouples and digital readouts. During each one hour test run a pair of EPA Method 2 

traverses were conducted and the average volumetric flow rate for the pair was used in detennining 

the emission rates calculated. 

4.4 EPA METHOD 4 (FLUE GAS MOISTURE) 

The moisture content was determined using instrumentation and test procedures that confonn to 

the requirements of EPA Method 4. A single point located in the center ofthe exhaust stack was 

sampled during the moisture determination and the meter box was operated at a constant flow 

rate equal to the Delta H of the meter consoL A single moisture determination was conducted 

during each pair of EPA Method 2 determinations. The moisture results of each EPA Method 4 

sample train was also used as a quality control check and the detailed results of these moisture 

determinations is included in Appendix A. The results of moisture determinations indicated that 

good sampling techniques were employed and each run was leak free. 

4.5 INSTRUMENTAL TESTING (01; COl, NOx, AND CO) 

The instrumental analyzer testing was conducted according to the procedures of EPA Methods 3A, 

7E, and to. An extractive system provided a continuous, conditioned sample (free of water vapor 

and particulate matter) to the analyzers. This system is described in Section 4.5.1. Prior to 

initiating sampling all performance checks were successfully completed on the instruments, which 

included interference checks, on-site NOx analyzer N~ converter efficiency check, site specific 

response time determinations. The data documenting the analyzer performance check performed 

during this test program are contained in Appendices B-2 and B4. 

4.5.1 Sample Collection 

The sample collection system consisted of a stainless-steel probe with a particulate filter, sample 

lines, a moisture removal trap, and a sample pump. All effluent samples were drawn from the 

center of each exhaust stack sampling location. All effluent gas samples were routed through a 

4-2 
( 

Section 4 

Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

distribution manifold board for delivery to the analyzers. The gas samples were distributed to the 

individual gas analyzers at near atmospheric pressure and excess sample flow from the system 

was vented outside the trailer. 

A second sample line delivered calibration gases from the control panel inside the trailer to the 

exit of the sample probes. During system calibration checks (Bias & Drift Checks), the gas flow 

was slightly greater than the total sample collection system flow and the small amount of excess 

calibration gas was vented through the probe assembly. The configuration of· the sampling 

system allows for the injection of calibration gases directly to the analyzers as required by some 

of the test methods. All pretest and posttest calibration procedures were performed as outlined in 

the specific EPA methods. 

The sampling locations of each of the three engines were checked for the presence of 

stratification during the previous test program conducted in October 2008. The results of the 

stratification checks on all three engines indicated the locations were not stratified. Appendix 

. B-2 contains the results of the stratification checks that were perfonned previously. 

4.5.2 Analyzer Descriptions 

Oxygen. A California Analytical Instrument Model 200 was used to determine the concentration 

of O2 in the flue gas stream. This instrument utilizes a paramagnetic transducer that measures 

the 02 from the atmosphere surrounding the measuring probe. The consumption of 02 generates 

a proportional electrical current. This current is then amplified and provides a signal output, 

which corresponds to a full-scale measurement range of zero to 25 percent O2. The 02 analyzer 

was operated with a high calibration standard of23.95% O2. 

Carbon Dioxide. A California Analytical Model200t or similar, nondispersive infrared (NDIR) 

analyzer was used to continuously monitor the C02 concentration in the flue gas stream. The 

theory of operation for this analyzer is based on the principle that C02 gas has a unique 

absorption line spectrum in the infrared region. The instrument consists of an infrared light 

source, a Chopper, a measuring cell, and a detector. The infrared light beam emitted by the 

source passes through the measuring cell filled with a continuously flowing gas sample. The 

light beam is partially absorbed or attenuated by the gas species of interest in this cell before 

reaching the front chamber of the detector. The CO2 analyzer was operated on an analyzer range 

C. of20% CO2 with a high calibration standard of 18.93% CO2. 

4-3 
i· 

{ . 

Section 4 

Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

Nitrogen Oxides. An API Model 200AH, or similar, NO! NO:zINO)t analyzer was used for the 

NOx monitoring. The analyzer automatically and continuously determined the nitrogen oxides 

(NOx) concentration in the exhaust gas using the principle of chemiluminescence. In the 

determination of NOx, the gas sample is first routed through a converter, where any N02 in the 

sample is disassociated to form NO. The converted sample is quantitatively converted to N02 by 

gas phase oxidation with molecular ozone produced within the analyzer. In this reaction, the 

nitrogen dioxide (N02) molecules are elevated to an electronically excited state, and then 

immediately reverted to a non-excited ground state. This reversion is accompanied by emission 

of photons, which impinge ana photomultiplier detector, and generate a low level DC current. 

The current is then amplified and used to drive a front panel meter and a data recorder. The NOx 

concentration detected by the instrument includes the contributions of both the NO in the sample 

and the NO resulting from the dissociation of the N02 in the sample. The NOx analyzer was 

operated on an operating range of 2000 ppm NOx with a high calibration standard of 1013 ppm 

NOx. 

Carbon Monoxide. A Thermo Environmental Model 48 Oas Filter Correlation (OFC) analyzer 

was used to continuously sample the carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations in the gas stream. 

GFC spectroscopy is based on the comparison of the infrared (IR) absorption spectrum of the 

measured gas to that of other gases in the sample being analyzed. This technique is implemented 

by using a high concentration sample of the measured gas (i.e., CO) as a filter for the infrared 

radiation transmitted through the analyzer. Radiation from an IR source is chopped and passed 

through a gas filter alternating between CO and N2 due to rotation of the filter wheel. The 

radiation then passes through an interference filter and onto an absorption cell. The IR radiation 

then exits the sample cell and falls onto an IR detector. 

The CO gas filter produces a reference beam that cannot be further attenuated by CO in the 

sample cell. The N2 side of the filter wheel is transparent to the IR radiation and thus produces a 

measure beam that is partially absorbed by CO in the celL The chopped detector signal is 

modulated by the alternation between the two gas filters with an amplitude related to the 

concentration of CO in the sample cell. Other gases, which absorb the reference and measure 

beams equally, do not cause modulation of the detector signal leaving the GFC responding 

specifically to CO. 

4-4 
( 

Section 4 

Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

The CO analyzer was operated at an operating range of 10,000 ppm CO with a high calibration 

standard of 8875 ppm CO. 

Data Acquisition System. The DAS is a PC-based system with hard disk storage and an external . 

8-channel analog-to-digital converter. In addition to providing an instantaneous display of analyzer 

responses, the DAS compiles· and averages the analyzer data collected once each second and 

documents analyzer calibrations. Data for the test period were averaged and corrected for 

calibration error and drift using the DAS software and a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet program. 

4.5.3 Calibration and Results , 

The gas analyzers were calibrated before use with an internal (direct-to-instrument) calibration to 

check analyzer linearity. Before each run, an external (through-the-entire-system) calibration 

was performed to check system bias at the zero and span points. Calibrations at the conclusion· 

of each run consisted of external system bias checks. The reported results for each parameter 

were corrected using the bias and drift check results and the equations in EPA Method 7E. These 

calculations were performed by the DAS software. 

4-5 
( 

I 

SECTIONS 

QAlQC PROCEDURES AND RESULTS 

5.1 GENERAL 

The objective of a QAlQCprogram is to assure that the precision and accuracy of all data 

generated is scientifically sound and documented to be !lin controL I! To accomplish this, 

standardized methods or procedures were used. They must be validated for their intended use, 

rigorously followed, and data reported with quality indicators (precision, accuracy, completeness, 

representativeness, etc.). 

As a guide, TRC uses the EPA document Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution 

Measurement System, Volume III (EPA-600/4-77-027b). TRC's QAlQC plan has incorporated 

certain considerations to the production of quality data in all of its sampling work regardless of 

the scope and purpose of the testing. These considerations include: 

• Planning the testing program; 

• Using reliable andwell.;.maintained equipment; 

• Using appropriate forms for recording sampling data; 

• Establishing a sample coding system to ensure proper chain of custody (i.e., sample 

identification, laboratory tracing and storage, analysis and reporting); 

• Using calibration and audit gases traceable to the National mstitute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST); 

• Controlling errors by checking data inputs and performing redundant calculations; 

• Adhering to established protocol. 

5.2 BAROMETER 

Barometric pressure values for the testing period were recorded from a digital barometer on-site. 

The barometer is periodically checked by comparison to a mercury barometer located in the 

TRC Field Office in Raleigh, NC. The field barometer reading was corrected for the elevation 

difference between the barometer location and the test port elevation, if necessary. 

5-1 
I 5.3 PITOTTUBES 

Section 5 

QAIQC Procedures and Results 

Each Pitot tube used in sampling either met the design specifications for Type S Pitot tubes in 

EPA Method 2 and was assigned a baseline coefficient (Cp) of 0.84 or a specific Cp was 

determined by a wind tunnel calibration. All pitot tubes were visually inspected at the 

completion of the test to insure structural integrity. 

5.4 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE INDICATORS 

Calibration was not required for inclined or inclined-vertical gauge-oil mano~eters. 

5.5 THERMOCOUPLES AND DIGITAL INDICATORS 

Thermocouples were originally calibrated by comparing them against an ASTM-3F mercury-inglass thermometer at approximately 32°F (ice water), ambient temperature and approximately 

2120P (boiling water). Each thermocouple was calibrated against temperature ranges to which it 

was to be typically. exposed during test conditions, and they must agree within 1.5 percent 

(expressed in ~) of the reference thermometer throughout the entire calibration range. A post 

calibration was performed in accordance with EPA AL T -011 using a single point calibration 

against an ASTM mercury-in-glass thermometer in addition to a continuity check of the 

thermocouple. The continuity check involved verifying that the thermocouple read-out trended 

in the appropriate direction when exposed to a temperature change. The calibration check is 

included in Appendix B. 

Digital indicators were checked by introducing a series of millivolt signal strengths to the input 

and comparing the indicator reading with the actual signal strength. Acceptable calibration error 

does not exceed 0.5 percent when temperatures are expressed in OR. 

5.6 CALIBRATION METER AND METERING SYSTEM 

The calibration description for the dry gas metering system using critical orifices in lieu of the 

wet test meter is given in Section 16.2 of EPA Method 5. A leak check of the metering system 

before calibration was performed as per Figure 5.2 of EPA Method 5. The metering system's 

pump is operated for 5 minutes using the smallest orifice to heat up the pump and system to 

stabilize the meter inlet and outlet temperatures. Values for the orifice meter setting (delta H), 

5-2 
Section 5 

QAIQC Procedures and Results 

( <. corresponding dry test meter volume (V d), dry test meter inlet and outlet gas temperatures (!:<ti and 

ldn), and time were recorded for the initial calibration. The ratio of the critical orifice volume to 

the dry test meter volume (y or gamma) and the orificepressure differential that equates to 0.75 

cfin at. standard conditions (delta H@) were then calculated. 

I ... 

5.7 POST-TEST METER CALIBRATION CHECK 

Posttest meter calibrations to determine the y (or Yqa) were conducted on the dry gas to check 

their accuracy against the original pretest calibration. This posttest calibration was made using 

the alternative procedure defined by EPA as ALT-009. This procedure is performed on-site 

using the data collected for each of the test runs. It is preferred by EPA because it eliminates the 

questions about possible meter damage during transport after the emission test and, because the 

calibration data is available in the field immediately following the test, it eliminates the costly 

travel, remobilization, and scheduling of a retest should the meter fail the posttest calibration. 

Additionally, the metering system passed the leak check procedure defined in Method 5 Item 5.6. 

A complete copy of EPA ALT -009 is available from EPA from the EMC website at 

http://www.epa.govlttnlemcl. 

5.8 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM QAlQC 

The CEMS was calibrated in accordance with the specific test methods referenced in Section 4. 

The system response time was determined to be less than 2 minutes. In general, the QAlQC 

measures included the use of Protocol I calibration gases, pre- and post-test run calibrations, 

calibration error and bias tests. Copies of the certifications for the Protocol 1 gas standards are 

included in Appendix B-3. Copies of the CEMS system bias check and calibration error test are 

included with the field data in Appendix A-2. Copies of each test post-run bias check, along 

with the corrected test run averages, are included with each individual run in those appendices. 

5.9 DATA REDUCTION AND VALIDATION 

The data collected in the field were recorded on standardized data sheets. The Field Team 

Leader reviewed the collected data in the field and made note of any discrepancies or errors. 

TRC Project Manager or QC Coordinator validated the field data based on the test protocol and 

the standard operating procedures for each method. They also checked the calculation 

C .. < spreadsheets for correct data entry and calculation equations. 

5-3 
1. 

2. 

APPENDIX , , A . , 

'-

FIELD))ATA 

'Meth9d l;.4,Vata . Raw CEMJ)ata 
\ 

C \ 

1. 

AffENDIXA 

FIELD DATA 
METHOD 1 .. TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS TRC 

Plant Name MARTA Boulevard Facility 

City/State Atlanta, Georgia 

Test Location Enolne Exhaust Stacks 1, 2 & 3 

Personnel I Date KL&MB 4128109 

Stack I Ports Type or Stack X Rectangle 

No. of Ports AvalJable 2 

No. of Ports Used 2 

Port Inside Diameter, In 2 in 

Put dIagram of test 

location(s) on back 

ofthls sheet 

Distance to Flow 

D 

T.stPort 

Environmental Corporation 

If more than 8 and 2 diameters Sit duct 

diameter Is less than 24", use 8 or 9 points 

DIAMETERS 

Velocity UP DOWN Particulate 

8 2 

7 1.8 

6 1.5 

5 1.3 

240'25 

2 0.5 

DOWNSTREAM DIAMETERS AND USE THE HIGHER NUMBER OF 

POINTS. 

Equivalent Diameter (for rectangular ducts): 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

De = 2 * Depth * Width I (Depth + Width) .----1 

= 2*( )*( )/( )+( )= I 

LOCA TlON OF POINTS IN CIRCULAR STACKS OR DUCTS 

(Ffadion of Slack diameter tom inside WIIIillo \revet'll. point) 

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 

.146 .067 .044 .032 .026 .021 .018 .016 .014 .013 

.854 .250 .146 .105 .082 .067 .057 .049 .044 .039 

.750 .296 .194 .146 .118 .099 .085 .075 .067 

.933 .704 .323 .226 .177 .146 .125 .109 .097 

.854 .877 .342 .250 .201 .169 .146 .129 

.956 .806 .658 .356 .269 .220 .188 .165 

.895 .774 .644 .366 .283 .236 .204 

.968 .854 .750 .834 .375 .296 .250 

.918 .823 .731 .625 .382 .306 

.974 .882 .799 .717 .818 .388 

.933 .854 .780 .704 .612 

.979 .901 .831 .784 .694 

.943 .875 .812 .750 

.982 .915 .854 .796 

For 22 or 24 test points. .951 .891 .835 

aee Method 1 table In CFR .984 .925 .871 

.956 .903 

.986 .933 

.961 

.987 

LOCA TlON OF POINTS IN RECTANGULAR STACKS OR DUCTS 

(Fl'llctlOI1 of stack diameter tom I n. Id e w 1110 IrS I'll polnl) • vo • 

2 " 4 ~ Ii I II 1:1 10 11 12 

.250 .167 .125 .100 .063 .071 .063 .058 .050 .045 .042 

.750 .500 .375 .300 .250 .214 .188 .167 .150 .136 .125 

.833 .825 .500 .417 .357 .313 .278 .250 .227 .208 

.875 .700 .583 .500 .438 .389 .350 .318 .292 

.900 .750 .643 .563 .500 .450 .409 .375 

.917 .786 .688 .611 .550 .500 .458 

.929 .813 .722 .850 .591 .542 

.938 .833 .750 .882 .625 

.944 .850.773 .708 

.950 .864 .792 

.955 .875 

.958 

~~ lo~..v (print) 
2 

6 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

M2-M4 Data.xls 

VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION 

Company & Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facility 

Test Location: Engine No.2 (Engine at Idle) 

Operator: Ken Loder I Matt Brooks 

Test Delta P 

Point (in H2O) 

A-1 0.04 

2 0.04 

3 0.07 

4 0.07 

5 0.07 

6 0.06 

7 0.06 

8 0.035 

B-1 0.085 

2 0.08 

3 0.085 

4 0.08 

5 0.08 

6 0.075 

7 0.08 

8 0.08 

Default Wall Adj. Faotor 

IUsed 

X I Not Used 

Standard CondiUons: 

68 deg F 

29.92 in Hg 

Temp. 

.LEl 

387 A 

387 Pbar 

387 Pg 

387 Cp 

387 %02 

387 %C02 

387 %N2 

387 ts 

394 sqrtdp 

420 dp 

383 

397 

400 OGMSampling 

390 Wel·Dry Bulb 

392 

390 Theta 

y 

tm 

Vm 

Vic 

dH 

Vmstd 

Vwstd 

%H20 

%H20Sat 

Mfd 

Md 

Ms 

Fa 

Ps 

vs 

vs 

Qsd 

QsdH 

Qsw 

QswH 

QswH (WAF) 

Qaw 

Run Number: 

Date: 

Start Time: 

Stop Time: 

TEST DATA 

Parameter 

Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. 

Barometric Pressure: 

Source Gas Static Pressure: 

Pitot Tube Coefficient: 

Oxygen, by vol. dry: 

Carbon Dioxide, by vol. dry: 

Nitrogen, by vol. dry: 

Avg Source Gas Temperature: 

Avg Square Root Delta p: 

Average Velocity Head For 16 pts: 

(Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) 

Method 4 Run 10: 

Run Start-Stop Times: 

Override Moisture: 

Net Run Time: 

Dry Gas Meter Cal. Factor: 

Dry Gas Meter Temperature: 

Volume of Metered Gas Sample: 

Tot. Vol. of Liquid Collected: 

Avg Meter Press. Differential: 

RESULTS TABULATION 

Volume of Metered Gas Sample 

Volume of Water Vapor 

Moisture Content, by volume 

Moisture @ Saturated Condo 

Dry Mole Fraction 

Source Gas Molecular Wt., Dry 

Source Gas Molecular wt., Wet 

Fuel Factor 

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure 

Source Gas Velocity 

Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF) 

Volumetric Air Flow Rates 

Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Dry 

Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry 

Standard Cubic FeetIMin., Wet 

Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet 

Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet (WAF) 

Actual Cubic Feet/Min., Wet 

*" Value used in calculations 

U2-1-M2-1 

4128109 

18:26 

18:56 

U2-1-M2-1 

-50~27 SQ. In. 

30.28 In. Hg 

0.00 In. H20 

0.84 

0.10 %02 

10.80 % C02 

89.10 %N2 

391.4 OF 

0.2589 In. H20 

0.0670 In. H20 

U2-M4·1 

18:26-18:56 

na % 

30 Minutes 

0.9927 

89.1 OF 

22.962 ACF 

117.2 grams 

2 In. H2O 

22.290 OSCF' 

5.517 sCP 

19.84 'Yo" 

100.0 'Y. 

0.8016 

29.73 Ib/lll-mole 

27.40 IbIIll-mole 

1.93 

30.28 In.Hg 

18.83 fIIsec 

18.74 fIIsec 

198 SCFMOry 

11,905 SCFHOry 

248 SCFMWet 

14,851 SCFHWel 

14,777 SCFHWel (" 

394 ACFM \ .. 
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION 

Company & Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facility Run Number: U3-1·M2·1 

( Test Location: Engine No.3 (Engine at Idle) \ 

Date: 4128109 

Operator: Ken Loder I Matt Brooks Start Time: 20:12 

Stop Time: 20:42 

TEST DATA 

Test Delta P Temp. 

E2i!l! (in 1:!2Ql W Parameter U3 ... ·M2·1 

A·1 0.04 370 A Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. -5ir2'7 sq. in. 

2 0.045 370 Pbar Barometric Pressure: 30.28 in.Hg 

3 0.055 365 Pg Source Gas Static Pressure: -0.22 in. H2O 

4 0.04 365 Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient: 0.84 

5 0.045 368 %02 Oxygen, by vol. dry: 0.30 %02 

6 0.05 368 %C02 Carbon Dioxide. by vol. dry: 11.30 % C02 

3 0.055 369 %N2 Nitrogen. by vol. dry: 88.40 %N2 

8 0.05 362 ts Avg Source Gas Temperature: 360.8 'F 

B-1 0.065 355 sqrtdp Avg Square Root Delta p: 0.2277 In. H2O 

10 2 0.07 356 dp Average Velocity Head For 16 pIs: 0.0519 In. H2O 

11 3 0.0'/5 352 (Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) 

1: 4 0.065 355 

13 5 0.055 355 DGMSampling Method 4 Run 10: U3·M4·1 

14 6 0.05 357 Wet·Dry Bulb Run Start-Stop TImes: 2012-2042 

15 7 ri.ri65 354 Override Moisture: NA% 

16 8 0.02 352 Theta Net Run Time: 30 Minutes 

11 y Dry Gas Meter Cal. Factor. 0.9927 

18 tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature: 91.2 OF 

19 Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample: 21.79 ACF 

20 Vic Tot. Vol. of Liquid Collected: 107.4 grams 

2' dH Avg Meter Press. Differential: 2 In. H2O 

22 

23 

24 

25 

RESULTS TABULATION 

Vmstd Volume of Metered Gas Sample 21.072 DSCF' 

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor 5.055 SCF' 

%H20 Moisture Content. by volume 19.35 %" 

%H20Sat Moisture @ Saturated Condo 100.0 % 

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.8065 

Md Source Gas Molecular WI., Dry 29.82 IbIIlHnole 

Ms Source Gas Molecular Wt., Wet 27.53 lbIIb-mole 

Default WaH Adj. Factor Fa Fuel Factor 1.82 

IUsed Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure 30.26 In. Hg 

X INOlUSed vs Source Gas Velocity 16.23 flfsec 

vs Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF) 16.15 flfsec 

Volumetric Air Flow Rates 

Standard Condflions: Qsd Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Dry 178 SCFMDry 

68 degF QsdH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry 10,702 SCFHDry 

29.92 In Hg Qsw Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Wet 221 SCFMWet 

QswH Standard Cubic FeetJHour, Wet 13,270 SCFHWel 

(,.~.-. QswH (WAF) Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet (WAF) 13,204 SCFHWel 

Qaw Actual Cubic FeeVMln .• Wet 340 ACFM 

** Value used In calculations 

M2.M4 Oala,xis 
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION 

Company & Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facility Run Number: U1-I-M2-1 

Test Location: Engine NO.1 (Engine at Idle) Date: 4128109 

Operator: Ken Loder I Matt Brooks Start Tlme: 21:05 

Stop Time: 21:45 

TEST DATA 

Test Delta P Temp. 

Point (In H2O) L..fl Parameter U1-1·M2·1 

A-1 0.09 379 A Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. -5"0.27 sq. in. 

2 0.095 385 Pbar Barometric Pressure: 30.28 in.Hg 

3 0.095 385 Pg Source Gas Static Pressure: -0.22 in. H20 

4 0.07 387 Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient: 0.64 

5 0.055 372 %02 Oxygen. by vol. dry. 6.40 %02 

II 6 0.065 362 %C02 Carbon Dioxide, by vol. dry: 8.00 % C02 

3 0.065 370 %N2 Nitrogen, by vol. dry: 85.60 %N2 

8 0.06 375 ts Avg Source Gas Temperature: 378.4 OF 

9 B-1 0.075 375 sqrtdp Avg Square Root Delta p: 0.2603 In. H2O 

10 2 0.085 375 dp Average Velocity Head For 16 pts: 0.0677 In. H2O 

11 3 0.075 380 (Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) 

12 4 0.07 382 

13 ~ 0.06 382 DaM Sampling Method 4 Run 10: U1·M4·1 

14 6 0.035 382 WeI-Dry Bulb Run Start-8top Times: 2105-2145 

15 7 0.055 382 Override Moisture: na % 

16 8 0.05 382 Theta Net Run Time: 30 Minutes 

IT y Dry Gas Meter Cal. Factor: 0.9927 

18 tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature: 90.3 OF 

19 Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample: 22.402 ACF 

20 Vic Tot. Vol. ofUquid Collected: 82.3 grams 

21 dH Avg Meter Press. Differential: 2 In. H20 

22 

23 

24 

25 

RESULTS TABULATION 

Vmstd Volume of Metered Gas Sample 21.699 DSCP 

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor 3.874 SCF' 

%H20 Moisture Content, by volume 15.15 % 0' 

%H20Sat Moisture @ Saturated Condo 100.0 % 

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.8465 

Md Source Gas Molecular Wt.. Dry 29.54 Ibllb-mole 

Ms Source Gas Molecular Wt.. Wet 27.79 Ibllb-mole 

Default Wall Adj. Factor Fo Fuel Factor 1.61 

IUsed Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure 30.26 In.Hg 

X INot Used vs Source Gas Velocity 18.66 ftlsec 

vs Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF) 18.57 ftlsec 

Volumetric Air Flow Rates 

Standard Conditions: Qsd Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Dry 211 SCFMOry 

68 deg F QsdH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry 12,675 SCFHOry 

29.92 In Hg Qsw Standard Cubic Feet/Min .• Wet 249 SCFMWet 

QswH Standard CubiC FeetIHour. Wet 14,938 SCFHWet 

QswH(WAF) Standard Cubic FeeVHour. Wet fNAF) 14,864 SCFHWet 

Qaw Actual Cubic FeetlMin., Wet 391 (, ... , ' ACFM 

•• Value used In calculations 

M2-M4 Oata.xIs 
10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

~ .. 

M2-M4 Data.xls 

VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION 

Company & Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facillty 

Test Location: Engine No.1 (Engine at Maximum Load) 

Operator: Ken Loder I Matt Brooks 

Run Number: 

Date: 

Start Time: 

U1·M·M2·1 

4128/09 

23:04 

Stop Time: 23:15 

Test Delta P 

pOint [in HgQ} 

A-1 0.33 

2 0.33 

3 0.36 

4 0.34 

5 0.34 

6 0.34 

3 0.37 

8 0.36 

B·1 0.36 

2 0.38 

0.34 

4 0.31 

5 0.26 

6 0.2 

0.23 

8 0.28 

Default Waif Adj. Factor 

I Used 

X INotUsed 

Standard Conditions: 

68 deg F 

29.92 in Hg 

Temp. 

.L..El 

654 

650 

646 

641 

632 

622 

601 

598 

590 

590 

590 

622 

613 

605 

610 

610 

TEST DATA 

parameter 

A Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. 

Pbar Barometric Pressure: 

Pg Source Gas Static Pressure: 

Cp Pltot Tube Coefficient: 

%02 Oxygen. by vol. dry. 

%C02 Carbon Dioxide. by vol. dry: 

%N2 Nitrogen, by vol. dry. 

ts Avg Source Gas Temperature: 

sqrtdp Avg Square Root Detta p: 

dp Average Velocity Head For 16 pts: 

(Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) 

OGM Sampling Method 4 Run 10: 

Wet.ory Bulb Run Start-Stop Times: 

Override Moisture: 

Theta Net Run Time: 

y Dry Gas Meter Cal. Factor: 

tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature: 

Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample: 

Vic Tot. VoLof Liquid Collected: 

dH Avg Meter Press. Differential: 

RESULTS TABULATION 

Vmstd Volume of Metered Gas Sample 

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor 

%H20 Moisture Content. by volume 

%H20Sat Moisture @ Saturated Condo 

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 

Md Source Gas Molecular Wt.. Dry 

Ms Source Gas Molecular Wt .• Wet 

Fo Fuel Factor 

Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure 

vs Source Gas Velocity 

vs Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF) 

~lum!i!lric Air Flow Rates 

Qsd Standard Cubic Feet/Min •• Dry 

QsdH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry . 

Qsw Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Wet 

QswH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet 

QswH r;NAF) Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet foNAF) 

Qaw Actual Cubic Feet/Min .• Wet 

.... Value used in calculations 

U1-M-M2·1 

50.27 sq. In. 

30.28 In.Hg 

-0.12 In. H20 

0.84 

0.10 %02 

11.20 % C02 

88.70 %N2 

617.1 OF 

0.5643 In. H2O 

0.3184 In. H20 

U1·M-M4·1 

2225·2255 

na % 

30 Minutes 

0.9927 

85.3 OF 

22.634 ACF 

112.8 grams 

2 In. H2O 

22.125 OSCF' 

5.309 SCF' 

19.35 % .. 

100.0 % 

0.8065 

29.80 tb/lb-mole 

27.51 tb/lb.mole 

1.86 

30.27 In.Hg 

46.08 ftlaee 

45.85 ftlsee 

386 SCFMOry 

23,162 SCFHOry 

479 SCFMWel 

28,720 SCfHWet 

28.577 SCFH Wet 

965 ACFM 
VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION 

Company & Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facility Run Number: U3·M-M2·1 

Test Location: Engine No.3 (Engine at Maximum Load) Date: 04129109 ( " 

Operator. Ken Loder I Matt Brooks Start Time: 00:05 

Stop Time: 00:44 

TEST DATA 

Test Delta P Temp. 

Point (in H2O) C£l Parameter U3-M·M2-1 

A-1 0.49 605 A Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. 50.265 sq. In. 

.2 2 0.48 605 Pbar Barometric Pressure: 30.28 In. Hg 

3 0.48 608 Pg Source Gas Static Pressure: -0.12 In. H2O 

4 0.47 609 Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient: 0.84 • 

5 5 0.45 609 %02 Oxygen, by vol. dry. 0.00 %02 

6 0.46 605 %C02 Carbon Dioxide, by vol. dry. 11.60 % C02 

7 0.46 605 %N2 Nitrogen. by vo!. dry: 88.40 %N2 

8 0.45 600 ts Avg Source Gas Temperature: 600.3 'F 

B-1 0.44 598 sqrtdp Avg Square Root Delta p: 0.6609 In. H2O 

10 2 0.47 597 dp Average Velocity Head For 16 pts: 0.4368 In. H20 

II 3 0.47 597 (Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) 

12 4 0.45 595 

13 5 0.36 595 DGMSampUng Method 4 Run ID: U3-M·M4-1 

14 6 0.37 579 Wet-Dry Bulb Run Start-Stop Times: 0005-0044 

15 7 0.36 598 Override Moisture: na~% 

18 0.35 599 Theta Net RUn Time: 30 Minutes 

17 y Dry Gas Meter Cal. Factor: 0.9927 

18 tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature: 81 OF 

19 Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample: 22.799 ACF 

20 Vic Tot. Vol. of Liquid Collected: 111.3 grams 

21 dH Avg Meter Press. Differential: 2 In. H20 

22 

23 

24 

25 

RESULTS TABULATION 

Vmstd Volume of Metered Gas Sample 22.463 DSCF' 

Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor 5.239 SCF' 

%H20 Moisture Content, by volume 18.91 % .. 

%H20Sat Moisture @ Saturated Condo 100.0 % 

Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.8109 

Md Source Gas Molecular WI., Dry 29.86 IbIIb·mole 

Ms Source Gas Molecular Wt., Wet 27.61 Ibllb-moIe 

Default Wall Adj. Factor Fo Fuel Factor 1.80 

IUsed Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure 30.27 in. Hg 

X INotUSed vs Source Gas Velocity 53.45 ftlsec 

vs Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF) 53.18 ftlsec 

Volumetric Air Flow Rates 

Standard Conditions: Qsd Standard CubiC Feet/Min., Dry 457 SCFMDry 

68 deg F OsdH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry 27,442 SCFHDry 

29.92 In Hg Osw Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Wet 564 SCFMWet 

QswH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet 33,843 SCFHWet 

OswH~AF) Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet ~AF) 33,673 SCFH Wet 

Oaw Actual Cubic FeetiMin., Wet 1,119 ACFM ( 

•• Value used In calculations 

M2-M4 Data.xls 
METHOD '2/4· VELOCITY 1 MOISTURE FIELD DATA TRC 

Environmental Corporation 

U..l -M4-:L 

Della P avg is square of the average of the Individual square rools 

Checked By: --W~!!...-------- (sign) _.,...J.;K!£e!..!.lnnJ.Se!1!.thL!l=l.!o~dear ____ -..., ____ ---, (print) 

RAL-M2-4.XLS 
METHOD 2 14 • VELOCITY I MOISTURE FIELD DATA TRC 

'\ \.'L 1 'l..O I Gas Parameters 

c .. Checked By: --I,f-V!~"""--------- (sign) _---!,:K~e!..!!nn.!.\ie:.u.thU:L~o~de:<!.r __________ (print) 

RAL-M2-4.xLS 
METHOD 214 .. VELOCITY I MOISTURE FIELD DATA TRC 

Environmental Corporation 

Deffa P avg is square of the average of the indiVidual square roots 

Checked By: -fJ1Yr-IF--------- (sign) _.......J.;K).><e.!.llnn....,.e"""thwL~o:l:!;de"-l.r ____ -'--_____ (print) 

RAL·M2·4.XLS 
METHOD 2/4 • VELOCITY I MOISTURE FIELD DATA TRC 

Environmental Corporation 

Checked By: --lI~\---''-:------- (sign) _--LK:lSie~nnwse2.!!th..wL!;:!,o~dCS<!er,--__________ · (print) 

~-"" .... r or QA Manager} . 

RAl-M2-4.XlS 
~ \.~\.o ... ~O\·. 

( 

CYCLONIC FLOW DETERMINATION DATA SHEET 

(WITH PRELIMINARY VELOCITY AND MOISTURE) 

MARTA 

Cubic Feet 

TRC' 

Environmental Corporation 

"'-__ &.... ______ :""'1 ___ .L... __ .... 1 Gas Parameters 

Balance No. ___ _ Total Catch "-----...... 

Delta P avg Is square of th9 aV9rage of the individual squar9 roots 

Checked By: -+~hII't:...--'------_ (sign) __ ,.!.lKlaen~n~et"-.!.h.=:Lod~e!...r _____ (p,rint) 

RAL·M2CYC-4.XLS 
CYCLONIC FLOW DETERMINATION DATA SHEET 

(WITH PRELIMINARY VELOCITY AND MOISTURE) 

TRC 

Environmental Corporation 

Delta P avg Is square of the average of the individual square roots S 

ABS(Yaw) :5 20° 

Checked By: --f-t---¥-7'Io."'------- (sign) __ -'-'K.!<:en""'n""'eto!,!.h.=;Lo""d=er'--____ (print) 

RAL-M2CYC-4.XLS 
APPENDIX A 

FIELD DATA· 

'2. 'Raw CEM D~ta 
(' 

( 

\ 
! 

I. 

Calibration Error Test at Run 1 . STRATA Version 2.0 

02 C02 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

4/28/2009 16:29:20 1.054 2.462 1647.3 

4/28/2009 17:47:20 21.014 0.178 10.1 

4/28/2009 17:48:21 21.039 0.182 6.31 

4/28/2009 17:49:22 15.779 2.917 6.5 

Calibration Error Test at Run 1 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No.2 

Reference Cylinder Numbers 

Zero Low-range Mid-range High-range 

02 XC016125 CC112179 CC117038 

CO2 XC016125 CC112179 CC117038 

CO CC112179 CC61468 XC016125 CC18971 

NOx XC016125 SG9120995 ALM00412 SG9132445 

DatefTime 4/28/2009 17:52:09 PASSED 

Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx 

Units % % ppm ppm 

Zero Ref Cyl 0 0 0 0 

Zero Avg 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 

Zero Error% 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 

Low RefCyl 2303 240.9 

Low Avg 2228.8 245.2 

Low Error% 0.8 0.4 . 

Mid Ref Cyl 9.64 9.03 4570 495 

Mid Avg 9.746 9.152 4529.3 495.1 

Mid Error% 0.4 0.6 0.5 0 

High RefCyl 23.95 18.93 8875 1013 

High Avg 24.065 18.752 8891.6 1008 

High Error% 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.5 

382.7 

54.5 

54.91N02 Converter Check 

55 (55.2ppm N02 gas) 
Initial System Bias 

Operator: 

Check, Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0 

Ken Loder 

Plant Name: 

Location: 

Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Unit No. 2 

Reference 

Zero 

02 XC016125 

C02 XC016125 

CO CC112179 

NOx XC016125 

Cylinder Numbers 

Span 

CC1l2179 

CC1l2179 

XC016125 

SG9120995 

Date/Time 04-28-2009 18:16:10 

Analyte 02 CO2 CO 

Units % % ppm 

Zero Ref Cyl 0.000 0.000 0.0 

Zero Cal 0.029 0.030 5.6 

Zero Avg 0.185 0.148 14.3 

Zero Bia$% 0.7% 0.6% 0.1% 

Zero Drift% 

Span Ref Cyl 9.641 9.031 4570.0 

NOx 

ppm 

0.0 

0.0 

0.6 

0.1% 

240.9 

Span cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 245.2 

Span Avg 9.604 9.012 4392.8 234.2 

Span Bias% 0.6% 0.7% 1.5% 1.1% 

Span Drift% 

System Bias Check End 

Page 1 

PASSED 
Test Run 2 STRATA Version 2.0 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

Begin calculating run averages 

04-28-2009 18:38:10 0.184 10.801 9599,.2 499.2 

04-28-2009 18:39:11 0.184 10.792 9795.6 492.9 

( 04-28-2009 18:40:10 0.183 10.797 9434.7 497.8 

04-28-2009 18:41:11 0.183 10.779 9804.2 501.9 41.-:c 04-28-2009 18:42:10 0.184 10.768 9792.3' 499.5 

04-28-2009 18:43:11 0.183 10.759 9980.3' 495.6 

04-28-2009 18:44:10 0.184 10.753 9848.9' 500.9 

04-28-2009 18:45:10 0.184 10.740 9980.9' 504.5 

04-28-2009 18:46:10 0.183 10.742 9985.4' 505.2 

04-28-2009 18:47:10 0.183 10.721 10007.9' 493.5 

04-28-2009 18:48:11 0.183 10.739 9999.4' 493.5 

04-28-2009 18:49:10 0.182 10.727 10008.2 497.8 

04-28-2009 18:50:11 0.177 10.724 10006.5 491.2 

04-28-2009 18:51:10 0.173 10.719 10000.1 488.2 

04-28-2009 18:52:11 0.175 10.722 10000.1 486.7 

04-28-2009 18:53:10 0.180 10.715 9990.9 479.1 

04-28-2009 18:54:10 0.176 10.714 10010.3 485.7 

04-28-2009 18:55:10 0.181 10.714 10010.7 498.6 

04-28-2009 18:56:10 0.179 10.715 10011.1 491. 7 

04-28-2009 18:57:11 0.180 10.701 10011.3 492.7 

04-28-2009 18:58:10 0.182 10.700 10011.8 488.1 

04-28-2009 18:59:11 0.183 10.703 10012.0 494.0 

04-28-2009 19:00:10 0.177 10.683 10011.3 498.5 

04-28-2009 19:01:11 0.183 10.695 10012.7' 486.6 

04-28-2009 19:02:10 0.182 10.702 10013.0' 482.2 

04-28-2009 19:03:11 0.179 10.702 10013.5: 491. 0 

04-28-2009 19:04:10 0.180 10.966 8006.6' 484.9 

04-28-2009 19:05:11 0.179 10.812 8612.8 478.6 

04-28-2009 19:06:10 0.180 10.708 10000.6 478.0 

04-28-2009 19:07:11 0.180 10.694 9947.5 484.8 

Run Averages 02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

04-28-2009 19:07:11 0.181 10.740 9831.1: 492 .1 ~ Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No. 2 

Test Ru~ 2 End 

Page 1 
Final System Bias Check for Run 2. STRATA Version 2.0 

Operator: Ken Loder ( , Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No.2 

Run 10: U2-1 

Reference Cylinder Numbers 

Zero Span 

02 XC016125 CC112179 

CO2 XC016125 CC112179 

CO CC112179 XC016125 

NOx XC016125 SG9120995 

Daterrime 4/28/2009 19:22:11 PASSED 

Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx 

Units % % ppm ppm 

Zero Ref Cyl 0 0 0 0 

Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 

ZeroAvg -0.013 0.257 17.4 24.4 

Zero Bias% 0.2 1.2 0.1 2.4 

Zero Drift% -0.8 0.6 0 2.4 

Span RefCyl 9.641 9.031 4570 240.9 

Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 245.2 

SpanAvg 9.618 9.071 4413.9 238.6 

Span Bias% 0.5 0.4 1.3 0.7 

Span Orift% 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 

Ini ZeroAvg 0.185 0.148 14.3 0.6 

Ini Span Avg 9.604 9.012 4392.8 234.2 

Run Avg 0.181 10.74 9831.1 492.1 

Co 0.086 0.202 15.9 12.5 

Cm 9.611 9.041 4403.3 236.4 

CorrectAvg 0.096 10.767 10223.5 516 
Initial System Bias Check for Run 3. STRATA Version 2.0 

( Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

. Location: Unit No.3 

Run ID: U3-1 

Reference Cylinder Numbers 

Zero Span 

02 XC016125 CC112179 

CO2 XC016125 CC112179 

CO CC112179 XC016125 

NOx XC016125 SG9132445 

DatelTime 4/28/2009 20:03:10 PASSED 

An a Iyte 02 CO2 CO NOx 

Units % % ppm ppm 

Zero Ref Cyl 0 0 0 0 

Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 

ZeroAvg 0.153 0.091 4.1 6.1 

Zero Bias% 0.5 0.3 0 0.6 

Zero Drift% 

Span RefCyI 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 

Span Cal 9.746 9,152 4529.3 1008 

Span Avg 9.582 8.798 4383.8 1006.8 

Span Bias% 0.7 1.9 1.6 -0.1 

Span Drift% 
Test Run 3 STRATA Version 2.0 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

Begin calculating run averages <"i"""'" 04-28-2009 20:08:01 0.555 11. 019 64.2 3010.0 

04-28-2009 20:09:01 0.556 11. 018 64.2 3029.8 Ov3-J04-28-2009 20:10:01 0.565 11.014 61.0 3054.9 

04-28-2009 20:11:01 0.565 11.015 56.4 3069.7 

04-28-2009 20:12:01 0.563 11.015 63.4 3057.8 

04-28-2009 20:13:01 0.559 11.033 60,9 3062.0 

04-28-2009 20:14:00 0.578 11.048 59.4 3059.8 

04-28-2009 20:15:01 0.588 11.038 54.4 3108.9 

04-28-2009 20:16:00 0.575 11. 036 54.3 3106.3 

04-28-2009 20:17:01 0.603 11.014 52.1 3098.1 

04-28-2009 20:18:01 0.619 11.012 44.5 3151.5 

04-28-2009 20:19:01 0.612 11. 017 44.6 3158.8 

04-28-2009 20:20:01 0.607 11.024 44.5 3152.7 

04-28-2009 20:2~:01 0.611 11. 014 44.5 3149.7 

04-28-2009 20:22:01 0.390 11.147 221.2 2899.0 

04-28-2009 20:23:01 0.176 11.124 1647.9 653.3 

04-28-2009 20:24:01 0.175 11.078 2503.1 245.1 

04-28-2009 20:25:00 0.178 11.056 2826.3 243.5 

04-28-2009 20:26:01 0.175 11.032 3099.7 243.5 

04-28-2009 20:27:01 0.177 11.034 3043.3 242.2 

04-28-2009 20:28:01 0.177 11. 032 3051.2 242.8 

04-28-2009 20:29:01 0.177 11.035 3003.1 246.1 

04-28-2009 20:30:01 0.177 11.025 3114.5 253.4 

04-28-2009 20:31:01 0.177 11.033 3082.0 261.2 

04-28-2009 20:32:00 0.176 11.043 3168.6 267.4 

04-28-2009 20:33:01 0.177 11. 035 3240.8 272.0 

04-28-2009 20:34:01 0.176 11.036 3198.6 276.5 

04-28-2009 20:35:00 0.175 11.031 3157.9 281. 7 

04-28-2009 20:36:01 0.176 11.021 3145.2 285.0 

04-28-2009 20:37:01 0.175 11.002 3368.5 288.9 

Run Averages 02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

04-28-2009 20:37:01 0.374 11.036 1518.0 1685.6* 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Narne: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Uni t No. ] '{.J./ 

Test Run 3 End 

Page 1 
Final System Bias Check for Run 3. STRATA Version 2.0 

,. Final System Bias Check for Run 3 

( Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No. 3 

Run ID: U3-1 

Reference Cylinder Numbers 

Zero Span 

02 XC016125 CC112179 

CO2 XC016125 CC112179 

CO CC112179 XC016125 

NOx XC016125 SG9132445 

OatelTime 4/28/2009 20:43:21 PASSED 

Analyte 02 CO2 ,CO NOx 

Units % % ppm ppm 

Zero RefCyI 0 0 0 0 

Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 

ZeroAvg -0.018 -0.071 4.4 3 

Zero Bias% 0.2 0.5 0 0.3 

Zero Drift% -0.7 -0.9 0 -0.3 

Span RefCyI 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 

Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 1008 

Span Avg 9.618 8.918 4456.5 1004.3 

Span Bias% 0.5 1.2 0.8 -0.4 

Span Orift% 0.2 0.6 0.8 -0.2 

(' 

Ini Zero Avg 0.153 0.091 4.1 6.1 

Ini SpanAvg 9.582 8.798 4383.8 1006.8 

RunAvg 0.374 11.036 1518 1685.6 

Co 0.067 0.01 4.3 4.5 

Cm 9.6 8.858 4420.2 1005.5 

CorrectAvg 0.31 11.255 1566.5 1701.3 
Test Run 4 STRATA Version 2.0 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

Begin calculating run averages 

04-28-2009 21:23:09 6.389 7.742 43.9 118.6 uI .. I04-28-2009 21:24:10 6.417 7.739 43.9 114.2 

04-28-2009 21:25:09 6'.419 7.740 43.9 110.5 ( 

i 

04-28-2009 21:26:09 6.412 7.745 43.8 112.5 

04-28-2009 21:27:09 6.355 7.786 43.9 103.2 

04-28-2009 21:28:09 6.343 7.773 43.8 132.6 

04-28-2009 21:29:09 6.375 7.779 43.8 112.3 

04-28-2009 21:30:09 6.362 7.787 43.8 111.1 

04-28-2009 21:31:09 6.370 7.783 43.8 110.7 

04-28-2009 21:32:09 6.352 7.793 43.8 117.5 

04-28-2009 21:33:10 6.373 7.779 43.7 118.7 

04-28-2009 21:34:09 6.383 7.772 43.8 114.9 

04-28-2009 21:35:10 6.397 7.767 43.7 114.5 

04-28-2009 21:36:09 6.381 7.772 43.7 106.1 

04-28-2009 21:37:09 6.417 7.753 43.6 108.2 

04-28-2009 21:38:09 6.338 7.801 43.6 116.3 

04-28-2009 21:39:09 6.401 7.763 43.6 111.7 

04-28-2009 21:40:09 6.396 7.765 43.5 106.9 

04-28-2009 21:41:09 6.387 7.770 43.5 103.1 

04-28-2009 21:42:10 6.403 7.761 43.5 108.4 

04-28-2009 21:43:09 6.391 7.766 43.5 103.1 

04-28-2009 21:44:10 6.334 7.809 43.4 103.2 

04-28-2009 21:45:09 6.217 7.863 43.3 140.0 

04-28-2009 21:46:09 6.228 7.849 43.4 143.6 

04-28-2009 21:47:09 6.385 7.750 43.3 133.6 

04-28-2009 21:48:09 6.394 7.752 43.3 100.6 

04-28-2009 21:49:09 6.402 7.749 43.2 105.5 

04-28-2009 21:50:09 6.411 7.733 43.2 101. 7 

04-28-2009 21:51:10 6.338 7.786 43.2 100.7 

04-28-2009 21:52:09 6.250 7.812 43.2 133.9 

Run Averages 02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

04-28-2009 21:52:09 6.367 7.775 43.6 113.9 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry ~Vd Facility 

Location: Unit No. 1 

Test Run 4 End 

c. 

Page 1 
Final System Bias Check for Run 4. STRATA Version 2.0 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

location: Unit No. 1 . 

RunlD: U1-1 

Reference Cylinder Numbers 

Zero Span 

02 XC016125 CC112179 

CO2 XC016125 CC112179 

CO CC112179 XC016125 

NOx XC016125 SG9132445 

DatelTime 4/26/2009 21 :57:26 PASSED 

Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx 

Uni~s % % ppm ppm 

Zero Ref Cyl 0 0 0 0 

Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 

Zero Avg 0.113 -0.072 3.5 1.9 

Zero Bias% 0.4 0.5 0 0.2 

Zero Drift% 0.5 0 0 -0.1 

Span Ref Cyl 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 

Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 1006 

Span Avg 9.52 8.731 4363.3 1002.9 

Span Bias% 0.9 2.2 1.9 -0.5 

Span Drift% -0.4 -1 . -1 -0.1 

I 

l IniZeroAvg -0.016 -0.071 4.4 3 

Ini SpanAvg 9.616 8.918 4456.5 1004.3 

RunAvg 6.367 7.775 43.6 113.9 

Co 0.048 -0.072 4 2.5 

Cm 9.569 6.624 4409.9 1003.6 

CorrectAvg 6.399 7.965 41.1 112.7 
Test Run 5 Begin. STRATA Version 2.0 

Operator: Ken Loder ( , Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

location: Unit No.1 - Initial Max Load test - RUN ABORTED 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

Begin calculating run averages 

A-'boA.eJ 4/28/2009 22:05:14 3.07 9.57 13.9 3797.9 

4/28/2009 22:06:14 3.08 9.57 13.8 3746.0 

4/28/2009 

4/28/2009 

22:07:14 

22~08:14 

3.09 

3.08 

9.57 

9.58 13.8 

13.9 3773.3 

3820.7 

~ 

Ltl'yV) 4/28/2009 22:09:14 2.13 10.19 13.8 3913.5 

4/28/2009 22:10:14 1.31 10.57 13.8 4198.6 

4/28/2009 22:11:13 1.26 10.60 13.7 4223.8 

4/28/2009 22:12:14 1.23 10.61 13.7 4229.6 

4/28/2009 22:13:13 1.20 10.64 13.6 4245.8 

4/28/2009 22:14:14 1.15 10.67 13.6 4247.0 

4/28/2009 22:15:14 1.12 10.68 13.6 4218.6 

4/28/2009 22:16:14 1.08 10.70 13.6 4233.7 

4/28/2009 22:17:14 1.06 10.71 13.6 4218.8 

4/28/2009 22:18:14 1.04 10.72 13.5 4214.5 

4/28/2009 22:19:14 1.01 10.75 13.5 4217.5 

4/28/2009 22:20:13 0.96 10.77 13.4 4191.6 

4/28/2009 22:21:14 0.94 10.78 13.5 4179.7 

4/28/2009 22:22:13 0.91 10.81 13.4 4163.0 

4/28/2009 22:23:14 0.80 10.87 16.3 4123.6 

4/28/2009 22:24:13 0.81 10.86 21.8 4053.2 

4/28/2009 22:25:14 0.94 10.81 13.3 4101.8 

4/28/2009 22:26:14 1.08 10.70 13.4 4162.7 

4/28/2009 22:27:14 1.28 10.61 13.3 4236.0 

4/28/2009 22:28:14 1.20 10.66 13.3 4311.3 

4/28/2009 22:29:13 1.11 10.72 13.4 4290.6 

4/28/2009 22:30:14 1.10 10.71 13.3 4236.4 

4/28/2009 22:31:13 1.17 10.68 13.4 4266.9 

4/28/2009 22:32:14 1.18 10.67 13.3 4272.4 

4/28/2009 22:33:14 1.18 10.67 13.4 4290.7 

4/28/2009 22:34:14 1.15 10.69 13.3 4295.7 

4/28/2009 22:35:14 1.09 10.71 13.3 4284.7 

4/28/2009 22:36:14 1.08 10.72 13.4 4262.2 

4/28/2009 22:37:14 1.05 10.74 13.4 4254.1 

4/28/2009 22:38:13 1.05 10.74 13.5 4258.2 

4/28/2009 22:39:14 1.01 10.77 13.4 4257.6 

4128/2009 22:40:13 0.96 10.80 13.4 4235.7 

4/28/2009 22:41:14 0.93 10.82 13.4 4219.8 

4/28/2009 22:42:13 1.81 10.26 13.3 4179.8 

4/28/2009 22:43:14 0.30 10.77 5363.3 2762.9 

4/28/2009 22:44:14 0.09 10.99 5100.7 379.0 

4/28/2009 22:45:14 0.09 11.30 854.9 309.0 

4/28/2009 22:46:14 0.09 11.31 102.7 376.7 

( 
Test Run 6 STRATA Version 2.0 

02 CO2 CO MOx 

% % ppm ppm 

Begin calculating run averages 

04-28-2009 22:49:03 0.101 11.298 84.7 377.6 

04-28-2009 22:50:04 0.100 11.306 99.9 435.6 lA \- vV\ 04-28-2009 22:51:03 0.096 11.303 100.1 384.9 

04-28-2009 22:52:04 0.096 11.299 105.4 348.9 

04-28-2009 22:53:03 0.094 11.309 142.7 331.2 

04-28-2009 22:54:04 0.094 11.304 145.1 311. 9 

04-28-2009 22:55:03 0.096 11.309 124.1 311.8 

04-28-2009 22:56:04 0.093 11.309 133.6 297.1 

04-28-2009 22:57:03 0.094 11.307 134.0 289.4 

04-28-2009 22:58:03 0.095 11.305 127.1 283.8 

04-28-2009 22:59:04 0.095 11.306 133.3 270.3 

04-28-2009 23:00:03 0.094 11.304 135.5 256.2 

04-28-2009 23:01:04 0.096 11.304 140.2 244.2 

04-28-2009 23:02:03 0.241 11.206 114.2 272.4 

04-28-2009 23:03:04 0.096 11.312 127.5 526.8 

04-28-2009 23:04:03 0.116 11.271 116.1 252.0 

04-28-2009 23:05:04 0.101 11.310 116.6 323.9 

04-28-2009 23:06:03 0.100 11. 297 128.6 197.4 

04-28-2009 23:07:03 0.098 11.311 120.2 193.2 

04-28-2009 23:08:04 0.098 11.313 131. 9 182.7 

04-28-2009 23:09:03 0.100 11.293 263:0 169.4 

04-28-2009 23:10:04 0.099 11.254 823.0 166,0 

04-28-2009 23:11:03 0.099 11.241 869.8 162.7 

04-28-2009 23:12:04 0.098 11.246 844.9 157.0 

04-28-2009 23:13:03 0.099 11. 234 1215.1 152.3 

04-28-2009 23:14:04 0.099 11.193 1406.2 149.1 

04-28-2009 23:15:03 0.103 11.237 1201.5 151.0 

04-28-2009 23:16:04 0.104 11.306 169.7 211.3 

04-28-2009 23:17:04 0.100 11.295 134.0 150.5 

04-28-2009 23:18:03 0.100 11.242 479.0 135.5 

04-28-2009 23:19:04 0.101 11.138 1806.6 132.7 

04-28-2009 23:20:03 0.101 11.207 1552.4 135.1 

04-28-2009 23:21:04 0.102 11.114 2329.4 132.4 

04-28-2009 23:22:03 0.101 11.221 1454.4 131.6 

04-28-2009 23:23:04 0.102 11.276 886.3 130.1 

04-28-2009 23:24:03 0.102 11.291 294.3 138.9 04-28~2009 23:25:03 0.102 11.189 1580.3 122.8 

04-28-2009 23:26:04 0.102 11.281 1025.5 126.9 

04-28-2009 23:27:03 0.103 11. 305 235.8 129.3 

04-28-2009 23:28:04 0.101 11.289 320.0 122.4 

04-28-2009 23:29:03 0.103 11.200 1106.3 120.8 

04-28-2009 23:30:04 0.102 11.136 1906.0 119.4 

04-28-2009 23:31:03 0.104 11. 083 2666.3 116.8 

04-28-2009 23:32:04 0.104 11.070 3056.4 116.5 

04-28-2009 23:33:03 0.105 11.207 1797.5 117.0 

04-28-2009 23:34:03 0.104 11.159 1491.4 117.1 

04-28-2009 23:35:04 0.105 11.134 2282.7 114.2 

04-28-2009 23:36:03 0.104 11.194 1475.7 113.5 

04-28-2009 23:37:04 0.105 11.196 1113.2 113.5 

04-28-2009 23:38:03 0.107 11.118 2111. 3 112.5 

04-28-2009 23:39:04 0.105 11.165 1756.2 111.3 

04-28-2009 23:40:03 0.107 11.169 2182.2 111.5 

Page 1 
Test Run 6 STRATA Version 2.0 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

04-28-2009 23:41:04 0.106 11.288 .630.3 112.8 

04-28-2009 23:42:03 0.107 11.292 442.1 116.6 

04-28-2009 23:43:04 0.106 11. 313 163.2 122.8 

04-28-2009 23:44:03 0.115 11.312 160.4 131.6 tA\-VVl ( 

04-28-2009 23:45:03 0.114 11.322 207.7 13.3.4 

04-28-2009 23:46:04 0.109 11.308 291.8 146.6 

04-28-2009 23:47:03 0.106 11.265 591.0 120.3 

04-28-2009 23:48:04 0.109 11.092 2310.7 106.9 

Run Averages 02 CO2 co NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

04-28-2009 23:48:04 0.104 11.248 818.3 189.6 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No. 1 

Test Run 6 End 

Page 2 
Final System Bias Check for Run 6 . STRATA Version 2.0 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No.1 

Run 10: U1-M 

Reference CyUnder Numbers 

Zero Span 

02 XC016125 CC112179 

CO2 XC016125 CC112179 

CO CC112179 XC016125 

NOx XC016125 SG9132445 

Daterrime 4/28/2009 23:53:34 PASSED 

Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx 

Units % % ppm ppm 

Zero RefCyi 0 0 0 0 

Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 

Zero Avg 0.124 0.066 3.5 1.9 

Zero Bias% 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 

Zero Drift% 0 0.7 0 0 

Span RefCyl 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 

Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 1008 

Span Avg 9.484 8.819 4454.4 978.8 

Span Bias% 1.1 1.8 0.8 -2.9 

Span Drift% -0.1 0.5 1 -2.4 

Ini ZeroAvg 0.113 -0.072 3.5 1.9 

Ini SpanAvg 9.52 8.731 4363.3 1002.9 

RunAvg 0.104 11.248 818.3 189.6 

Co 0.119 -0.003 3.5 1.9 

Cm 9.502 8.775 4408.8 990.8 

CorrectAvg -0.015 11.575 845.3 192.3 
Test Run 7 STRATA Version 2.0 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

Begin calculating ~un averages 

04-29-2009 00:03:0S 0.112 11.315 193.8 153.6 

04-29-2009 00:04:08 0.119 11. 324 126.2 260.6 

U~ .. / r'\ 04-29-2009 00:05:07 0.124 11.326 114.2 535.1 / 

I 

04-29-2009 00:06:08 0.113 11.352 129.0 491.4 

04-29-2009 00:01:07 0.109 11.342 172.1 196.7 

04-29-2009 00:OS:08 0.108 11.347 146.5 256.9 

04-29-2009 00:09:07 0.104 11.302 347.0 160.4 

04-29-2009 00:10:0S 0.106 11. 257 1240.7 111.6 

04-29-2009 00:11:07 0.104 11. 317 655.0 142.0 

04-29-2009 00:12:08 0.109 11.328 188.6 289.7 

04-29-2009 00:13:08 0.115 11.323 131.1 303.1 

04-29-2009 00:14:07 0.117 11.326 114.6 405.3 

04-29-2009 00:15:08 0.116 11.332 107.8 642.6 

04-29-2009 00:16:07 0.120 11. 331 105.9 758.6 

04-29-2009 00:17:08 0.109 11.336 129.7 339.8 

04-29-2009 00:18:07 0.107 11.339 130.5 204.7 

04-29-2009 00:19:08 0.104 11. 324 257.5 185.8 

04-29-2009 00:20:07 0.106 11.334 347.0 156.6 

04-29-2009 00:21:08 0.109 11.33S 219.9 243.2 

04-29-2009 00:22:0S . 0.109 11.342 147.7 309.1 

04-29-2009 00:23:07 0.121 11.337 106.6 499.9 

04-29-2009 00:24:0S 0.129 11.335 95.3 721.3 

04-29-2009 00:25:07 0.124 11.344 94.6 66S.3 

04-29-2009 00:26:08 0.119 11.348 101.0 485.3 

04-29-2009 00:27:07 0.119 11.350 96.5 607.6 

04-29-2009 00:2S:0S 0.112 11.362 9S.3 550.2 

04-29-2009 00:29:07 0.112 11.356 104.1 345.4 

04-29-2009 00:30:08 0.104 11.332 269.5 195.5 

04-29-2009 00:31:0S 0.106 11.310 574.2 131. 9 

04-29-2009 00:32:07 0.108 11.341 160.3 251.9 

04-29-2009 00:33:08 0.108 11.331 261.0 152.8 

04-29-2009 00:34:07 0.108 11.341 202.4 155.2 

04-29-2009 00:35:08 0.111 11.346 136.0 255.4 

04-29-2009 00:36:07 0.115 11.348 123.1 359.6 

04-29-2009 00:37:08 0.123 11.344 109.6 390.7 

04-29-2009 00:38:07 0.113 11.353 109.S 486.4 

04-29-2009 00:39:08 0.113 11.356 120.5 316.1 

04-29-2009 00:40:08 0.110 11.343 230.5 225.6 

04-29-2009 00:41:07 0.110 11.347 lS4.4 157.3 

04-29-2009 00:42:0S 0.109 11. 342 265.8 167.6 

04-29-2009 00:43:07 0.112 11.340 366.0 201.8 

04-29-2009 00:44:08 0.111 11.352 265.3 1S9.4 

04-29-2009 00:45:07 0.123 11. 359 174.3 367.1 

04-29-2009 00:46:08 0.130 11.360 110.2 644.9 

04-29-2009 00:47:07 0.118 11.352 113.6 407.9 

04-29-2009 00:48:08 0.113 11.356 143.0 234.6 

04-29-2009 00:49:08 0.114 11.350 170.3 231.6 

04-29-2009 00:50:0S 0.115 11.358 131.3 323.9 

04-29-2009 00:51:08 0.116 11. 347 225.1 172.7 

04-29-2009 00:52:07 0.119 11.356 137.9 528.3 

04-29-2009 00:53:08 0.121 11.351 137.1 45S.7 

04-29-2009 00:54:07 0.126 11.345 119.5 427.2 

Page 1 
Test Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

04-29-2009 00:55:08 0.122 11. 351 101.8 644.6 

04-29-2009 00:56:01 0.113 11.345 161.4 227.2 

( 

, 04-29-2009 

04-29-2009 

00:51:08 

00:59:01 

0.119 

0.115 

11.336 

11.346 

131.5 

134.6 

261.5 

290.6 u~'M 04-29-2009 00:59:08 0.114 11.344 140.8 188.2 

04-29-2009 01:00:08 0.114 11.324 361.3 181.8 

04-29-2009 01:01:07 0.113 11.347 182.0 195.5 

04-29-2009 01:02:09 0.127 11.337 123.2 312.8 

Run Averages 02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

04-29-2009 01:02:08 0.114 11.339 198.4 329.1 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Uni t NO.,. \(.J.../ Test Run 7 End 

Page 2 
Final System Bias Check for Run 7 . STRATA Version 2.0 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd facility 

Location: Unit NO."Z ...p./ 

Run 10: U3-M . ( 

( 

Reference Cylinder Numbers 

Zero Span 

02 XC016125 CC112179 

CO2 XC016125 CC112179 

CO CC112179 XC016125 

NOx XC016125 SG9132445 

DatelTime 4/29/2009 1 :08:44 PASSED 

Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx 

Units % % ppm ppm 

Zero RefCyl 0 0 0 0 

Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 

ZeroAvg 0.135 0.146 3.5 2 

Zero Bias% 0.4 0.6 0 0.2 

Zero Drift% 0 0.4 0 0 

Span Ref Cyl 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 

Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 1008 

Span Avg 9.484 8.866 4333.3 958.4 

Span Bias% 1.1 1.5 2.2 -4.9 

Span Drift% 0 0.2 -1.4 -2.0 

Ini ZeroAvg 0.124 0.066 3.5 1.9 

Ini Span Avg 9.484 8.819 4454.4 978.8 

Run Avg 0.114 11.339 198.4 329.1 

Co 0.129 0.106 3.5 2 

Cm 9.484 8.843 4393.8 968.6 

Correct Avg -0.016 11.611 202.9 342.8 
( 

\ 

APPENDIXB 

CALIBRATION DATA 

1..M2 .. 4 Calibration Documentation 

2. SiteSpecUic i\:nalyzer Checks 

3. Calibration GasCertificatesofAllaly~is .. 

4. . Analyzer Performance Checks 

r 
\. 
APPENDIXB 

CALIBRATION DATA· . . . 

. . 

1.· M 2-4Calibration DQCUment~tion 

/ 

\ 

Pitot Tube Inspection Sheet 

Pitot Nwnber: RP~201 Calibrated By: ______ 1_. L_o;...w_e ____ _ 

Inspection Date: 01105/2009 Reviewed By: ______ C;;..; • ...;.F...;.i...;.n...;.k ____ _ 

Pitot Type: Detachable Tip t'--__ ... Fixed I X PMlO 1 ..... _----' 

Coefficient: A sidec=J 

BSidec=J 

Wind Thnnel Calibration? No 0 Yes =1 ====1 ~ 

Diagram 1 

Degree Indicating level position 

for determining CLI and <>':. 

Diagram 2 

Degree indicating lel/lll position 

for determining PI and I!z. 

Degree Indicating level position for 

detenninlng T then calculate z. 

J, _~Vj 

~---__ fd 

. t / 

Degree Indlcallng lel/lll posnlon for 

determining 6 then calculate w. 

Level? 

Obstructions? 

Damaged? 

Diagram 1 

_100 < a., < +lOa = 

_100 < CX:l < +100::: 

Diagram 2 

-So < 131 < +5° = 

-S° < 132 < +50 = 

Diagram 3 

r= 

0= 

A= 

Pa = Pb =AJ2 >= 

0.188" ~ Dt ~ 0.375" = 

LOS Dt < Al2 < 1.5 Dt = 

z =A tany < 0.125" = 

w =A tan ® < 0.03125" = 

wand z meet specs? 

Comments: 24 in.Mini S-type wI 3/16" Pitot & 112" Sheath 

TC: RT-201 

YES 

NO 

NO 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0.488 

0.249 

0.189 

YES 

0.0000 

0.0000 

YES 

The pitot tube/probe meets or exceeds all specifications criteria and/or applicable design features and is hereby assigned 

a pitot tube coefficient factor of 0.84, unless a specific wind tunnel calibration coefficient has been determined. 

40 CPR 60, Appendix A, Method 2. Verify the minimum 3/4 inch separation between the pitot tube and the nozzle and minimum 2 inch setback 

( of the thennocouple (or 314" separation) in the assembled probe. 
Pitot Tube Inspection Sheet 

Probe Configuration 

Pitot Number: RP-201 

Inspection Date: 01/05/2009 

A. 

8. 

c. 

OR 

D. 

Calibrated By: J. Lowe ------------~~~------------ Reviewed By: C. Fink ---------------------------------------

D, =l 0.189 

Dn=1 NA 

a=1 NA 

Pa=1 0.249 

Pb=1 0.249 

b=1 NA 

c=1 NA 

d=1 NA 

e=1 NA 

OR 

c=1 NA 

f=1 2.1 

Specifications (EPA Method 2) 

Dt = 3116" to 3/8" 

Dn = 112" 

a 2: 3/4" 

b 2: 0 

c 2: 3" 

d 2: 3" 

e 2: 3/4" 

f 2: 2" 

Pa=Pb 

1.05 Dt ~ P ~ 1.50 Dt 

IDOES PITOT CONFIGURATION MEET SPECIFICATIONS? YES 
( 

THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

THERMOCOUPLE 10: RT-201 PITOT or PROBE 10: RP-201 -------- --------

3·POINT CALIBRATION 

Calibrated Source Reference Thermocouple Percent Mantle Reviewed 

Date By (specify) Temp, of Temp, of Error (1) Heat ·250 F By 

Ambient 73 .73 0.0 

07/11/08 D. Brewster Ice Bath 36 36 0.0 NA C. Fink 

Boiling Water 212 22 -28.3 

EPA APPROVED ALTERNATIVE METHOD (Alt - 011) SINGLE POINT CALIBRATION 

Calibrated Reference Thermocouple Difference (3) Continuity Pass I 

Date By Temp, OF (2) Temp, .oF I (within + 2 ° F) Check (4) Fall 

10/20/08 KRL 78 78 0 Good Pass 

01/05/09 J. Lowe 76 76 1 Good Pass 

04/30/09 KRL 75 75 0 Good Pass 

1) % error = (Thermocouple Temperature + 460) - (Reference Temperature + 460) x 100, should be < 1.5% 

Reference Temperature + 460 

2) Reference Thermometer Is mercury-In-glass and ASTM certified, unless otherwise noted. 

3) After each test run series, check lIle accuracy (and, hence, the calibration) of each lIlermocouple system at ambient temperature. 

The temperatures of the therrnocouple and reference therrnometers shall agree within + 2°F 

4) The continuity check Involves subjecting the tip of the thermocouple to a change In temperature to check for crimps, loose 

connections, or reversed connections. Thermocouples with crimps and loose connections will not Immediately respond to 

temperature changes, and those with reversed connections will show a temperature change In the opposite direction. 

RAL-TC CAL.XLS 

Reviewed 

By 

KRL 

C. Fink 

KRL 
MeterBoxID 

Gas Meter Number 

Calibrated By 

Orifice ID 

Orifice Coefficient K' 

Ambient Temperature 

Vacuum ~14.0" Hg) 

DeltaH 

Initial Volume Fe 

Final Volume Fe 

Total ~5 Ft3

) 

Initial DGM Temperature "F 

Final DGM Temperature "F 

Average Temperature "F 

Time Minutes 

Time Seconds 

DeltaH@ 

Gamma(Y) 

Average Gamma (Y) 

Delta H@ tolerance 

~. 

Dry Gas Meter 5-Point Full Test 

M3 

8759 

J. Pennington J 

Ron #1 Ron#l Ron #1 Rnn#l 

Calibration Date 

Barometric Pressure 

Orifice Set Calibration Date 

Ron #1 Rnn#l Ron #1 

-

Gamma(Y) 

Delta H@ 

Pass 

2/11/2009 

29.56 

2125/2008 

Ron #1 Ron #1 

Pass 

Pass 

, - 0.9927 -, 

1.950 

QA 1 QC Check: Sign and Date C2e1U 02-14-09 

Ron #1 
Dry Gas Meter Temperature Display Calibration 

MeterBoxID 

Date 

Calibrated By 

Input Temperature 

M3 

211112009 

J. Pennington 

I • Channel temperatures must agree with +1- 5 Op or 3 °c 

2 _ Acceptable temperature difference is less than 1.5 % 

I 

Reference Calibrator 

Serial Number 

Reference Calibration Date 

Temperature Reading from Individual Thermocouple Input1 

Pass 

Dry Gas Meter Thermocouple Calibration3 

I Reference Thermometer 

83 82 

Omega-CL23A 

T-235647 

8/11/2008 

Pass Pass 

Pass 

3 _ Dry gas meter thermicoupJe is compared to an ASTM type mercury in glass reference thermometer 

QA I QC Check: Sign and Date ae~u 02-14-09 
( 

c ... 
\ 

. APPENDIX B . 

CALIBRATION DATA 

2. Site Specific AnalY~f!rChecks 

( 
: ~ 
( 

Instrumental Test Method Quality Assurance Data 

MARTA 

Atlanta, 

Unit No.1, 2, & 3 

NOz to NO Converter Efficiency Test 

. SX45718 

11118/2011 60.72 

Acceptance Criteria: 

If the instrument response indicates at least 90 percent N02 to NO conversion, the converter is acceptable 

If the instrument response indicates less than 90 percent N02 to NO conversion, the converter is unacceptable 

and repair or replacement is required before repeating the check 

CEM-QA-KRL.xls 
Calibration Error Test at Run 1 . STRATA Version 2.0 

02 C02 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

4/28/2009 16:29:20 1.054 2.462 1647.3 382.7 

4/28/2009 17:47:20 21.014 0.178 10.1 54.5 

4/28/2009 17:48:21 21.039 0.182 6.31 54.91N02 Converter Check 

4/28/2009 17:49:22 15.779 2.917 6.5 55 (55.2ppm N02 gas) 

Calibration Error Test at Run 1 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No.2 

Reference Cylinder Numbers 

Zero Low-range Mid-range High-range 

02XC016125 CC112179 CC117038 

C02 XC016125 CC112179 CC117038 

CO CC112179 CC61468 XC016125 CC18971 

NOx XC016125 SG9120995 ALM00412 SG9132445 

DatelTime 4/28/2009 17:52:09 PASSED 

Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx 

Units % % ppm ppm 

Zero RefCyl 0 0 0 0 

ZeroAvg 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 

Zero Erro,.o/o 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 

Low RefCyi 2303 240.9 

LowAvg 2228.8 245.2 

Low Error% 0.8 0.4 

Mid RefCyl 9.64 9.03 4570 495 

Mid Avg 9.746 9.152 4529.3 495.1 

Mid Error% 0.4 0.6 0.5 0 

High RefCyi 23.95 18.93 8875 1013 

High Avg 24.065 18.752 8891.6 1008 

High Erro,.% 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.5 

(.: . 
Instrumental Test Method Quality Assurance Data 

Rack A 

ppm 

Response Time (sec.) 

94 

Stack Gas 

r_:, 

5.9 6976 363.81 
Test Run 1 Begin. STRATA Version 2.0 

Response Time Demonstration 

Operator: Kenloder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

location: Unit No. 2 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

412812009 18:16:12 0.177 9.092 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:13 0.174 9.092 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:14 0.176 9.092 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:15 0.172 9.092 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:16 0.179 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:17 0.184 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:18 0.174 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:19 0.177 9.082 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:20 0.169 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:21 0.178 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:23 0.17 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4128/2009 18:16:24 0.177 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4128/2009 18:16:25 0.169 9.092 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:26 0.18 9.092 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:27 0.171 9.092 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:28 0.182 9.092 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:29 0.171 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:30 0.176 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:31 0.176 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:32 0.172 9.092 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:33 0.172 9.045 5.9 234.2 

412812009 18:16:35 0.167 7.529 5.9 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:36 0.205 3.782 5.8 234.1 

4/2812009 18:16:37 0.258 1.634 5.7 234.2 

4/2812009 18:16:38 0.3 0.887 15.6 234.1 

412812009 18:16:39 0.292 0.572 15.5 234.1 

4/2812009 18:16:40 0.284 0.452 15.6 234.1 

412812009 18:16:41 0.262 0.391 15.6 234.2 

412812009 18:16:42 0.245 0.361 15.6 234.2 

412812009 18:16:43 0.229 0.342 15.6 234.2 

412812009 18:16:44 0.221 0.329 15.6 234.1 

412812009 18:16:46 0.214 0.312 15.6 234.2 

412812009 18:16:47 0.204 0.302 15.6 234.2 

412812009 18:16:48 0.201 0.302 15.6 234.2 

412812009 18:16:49 0.2 0.292 5.7 234.2 

412812009 18:16:50 0.2 0.292 5.7 234.2 

412812009 18:16:51 0.194 0.281 5.8 234.2 

412812009 18:16:52 0.195 0.272 5.8 234.2 

412812009 18:16:53 0.192 0.272 5.7 121.6 

412812009 18:16:54 0.19 0.272 5.8 121.5 

412812009 18:16:55 0.181 0.262 5.7 121.5 

412812009 18:16:57 0.19 0.262 5.8 121.5 

Begin calculating run averages 

412812009 18:16:59 0.193 0.262 5.7 121.5 

412812009 18:17:00 0.19 0.262 5.8 121.5 

4/28/2009 18:17:01 0.188 0.252 5.7 121.5 

412812009 18:17:02 0.188 0.252 5.7 121.5 

412812009 18:17:03 0.19 0.252 5.7 121.6 

412812009 18:17:04 0.19 0.252 5.7 121.6 

412812009 18:17:05 0.186 0.252 5.7 121.6 

4128/2009 18:17:07 0.188 0.241 5.7 6.5 

412812009 18:17:08 0.186 0.241 5.7 6.5 

412812009 18:17:09 0.191 0.241 5.8 6.5 

412812009 18:17:10 0.189 0.241 5.7 6.5 

412812009 18:17:11 0.19 0.241 5.7 6.5 

412812009 18:17:12 0.184 0.241 5.7 6.5 

412812009 18:17:13 0.194 0.242 5.7 6.5 

4/2812009 18:17;14 0.186 0.241 5.7 6.5 

4/2812009 18:17:15 0.191 0.232 5.7 6.5 

412812009 18:17:16 0.181 0.232 5.7 6.5 

4/2812009 18:17:17 0.196 0.232 5.9 6.5 

412812009 18;17:19 0.187 0.232 5.9 6.5 C_ 
Test Run 1 Begin. STRATA Version 2.0 

Response Time Demonstration 

( Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No. 2 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

412812009 18:17:20 0.202 0.232 5.9 1.7 

412812009 18:17:21 0.185 0.232 5.9 1.7 

412812009 18:17:22 0.194 0.232 5.9 1.7 

412812009 18:17:23 0.192 0.232 5.9 1.7 

412812009 18:17:24 0.197 0.232 5.8 1.7 

Start Upscale Response Urne test (Nitrogen to Stack gas) 

412812009 18:17:25 0.192 0.224 5.9 1.8 

4128/2009 18:17:26 0.191 0.222 5.8 1.7 

4128/2009 18:17:27 0.191 0.28 5.8 1.7 

412812009 18:17:28 0.189 2.129 5.9 1.7 

412812009 18:17:30 0.197 6.485 15.9 1.7 

4/2812009 18:17:31 0.188 9.315 36.1 1.8 

412812009 18:17:32 0.188 10.393 120.8 1.8 

4128/2009 18:17:33 0.188 10.675 335.7 1.8 

412812009 18:17:34 0.19 10.742 565.4 1.8 

412812009 18:17:35 0.19 10.n8 805.3 1.8 

412812009 18:17:36 0.191 10.802 1045 1.8 

412812009 18:17:37 0.189 10.812 1284.9 1.8 'C02 channel upscale Response time 

4128/2009 18:17:38 0.187 10.821 1534.7 1.8 (12 seconds) 

4128/2009 18:17:39 0.195 10.832 1784.4 1.8 

412812009 18:17:41 0.181 10.848 2024.3 1.8 

4/2812009 18:17:42 0.194 10.862 2254.1 1.8 

412812009 18:17:43 0.182 10.872 2704.1 1.8 

412812009 18:17:44 0.194 10.872 2904 1.8 

412812009 18:17:45 0.183 10.882 3123.9 1.8 

412812009 18:17:46 0.192 10.882 3384 1.8 

412812009 18:17:47 0.189 10.882 3573.8 1.8 

412812009 18:17:48 0.186 10.892 3784.2 1.8 

412812009 18:17:49 0.187 10.892 4054.1 1.8 

412812009 18:17:50 0.188 10.902 4204.1 1.8 

412812009 18:17:52 0.188 10.902 4314 1.9 

412812009 18:17:53 0.186 10.902 4524.1 152.1 

412812009 18:17:54 0.188 10.902 4794.3 152.1 

412812009 18:17:55 0.189 10.902 4973.7 152.1 

412812009 18:17:56 0.191 10.893 5144 152.1 

412812009 18:17:57 0.188 10.892 5244.2 152.1 

412812009 18:17:58 0.189 10.892 5434.4 152.1 

412812009 18:17:59 0.193 10.892 5574.3. 152.1 

412812009 18:18:00 0.189 . 10.892 5744.5 152.1 

412812009 18:18:01 0.188 10.884 5924.6 152.1 

412812009 18:18:03 0.176 10.883 6184.8 152.1 

412812009 18:18:04 0.214 10.883 6345.1 152.1 

412812009 18:18:05 0.201 10.883 6465.1 152.1 

412812009 18:18:06 0.206 10.893 6595.4 152.1 

412812009 18:18:07 0.193 10.892 6585.3 152.2 

412812009 . 18:18:08 0.197 10.892 6625.3 152.1 

4/2812009 18:18:09 0.193 10.893 6715.5 152.1 

412812009 18:18:10 0.194 10.902 6855.6 152.1 

4128/2009 18:18:11 0.196 10.892 6845.7 . 152.1 

412812009 18:18:12 0.194 10.893 6905.5 152.2 95% Increase to stable response of 7266.1 ppm 

412812009 18:18:14 0.19 10.893 6955.7 152.2 (47 seconds) 

412812009 18:18:15 0.191 10.893 7035.7 152.2 

412812009 18:18:16 0.192 10.902 7025.7 152.2 

412812009 18:18:17 0.193 10.902 7095.7 152.2 

412812009 18:18:18 0.189 10.902 7025.7 152.2 

412812009 18:18:19 0.193 10.902 6905.5 327.2 

4128/2009 18:18:20 0.191 10.902 6955.8 327.2 

4I28l2009 18:18:21 0.194 10.893 6935.6 327.2 

412812009 18:18:22 0.194 10.893 6915.8 327.2 

4/2812009 18:18:23 0.186 10.893 6945.7 327.2 

412812009 18:18:25 0.197 10.893 7045.9 327.2 

412812009 18:18:26 0.19 10~902 7086 327.2 

(~ 412812009 18:18:27 0.2 10.893 7186 327.2 
Test Run 1 Begin. STRATA Version 2.0 

Response TIme Demonstration 

Operator: Ken Loder (' Plant Name: Marta Peny Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No. 2 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

% % ppm ppm 

412812009 18:18:28 0.178 10.902 7216 327.2 

412812009 18:18:29 0.195 10.8931 7266.11 327.2 Stable reading 

412812009 18:18:30 0.187 10.902 7196.1 327.2 

412812009 18:18:31 0.19 10.902 7216.1 327.2 

412812009 18:18:32 0.195 10.893 7076 342.4 

4/2812009 18:18:33 0.191 10.893 7105.9 342.4 

412812009 18:18:34 0.198 10.893 7226.1 342.4 

412812009 18:18:36 0.19 10.902 7156.1 342.4 

4/2812009 18:18:37 0.199 10.903 7176.1 342.4 

4/2812009 18:18:38 0.19 10.902 7446.3 342.4 

4/2812009 18:18:39 0.193 10.903 7316.4 342.4 

4/2812009 18:18:40 0.192 10.903 7476.5 342.4 

4/28/2009 18:18:41 0.195 10.893 7416.3 342.4 

4/2812009 18:18:42 0.204 10.883 7346.3 342.4 

4/28/2009 18:18:43 0.195 10.892 7296.2 342.4 

4128/2009 18:18:44 0.208 10.884 7186.1 342.4 

4/2812009 18:18:45 0.193 10.893 7116.1 342.4 

4/28/2009 18:18:47 0.203 10.893 7156.2 342.4 

4/2812009 18:18:48 0.195 10.893 7036.1 342.4 

4128/2009 18:18:49 0.202 10.893 7166.2 342.4 

412812009 18:18:50 0.194 10.893 7186.2 342.4 

4128/2009 18:18:51 0.193 10.893 7186.2 342.4 

412812009 18:18:52 0.19 10.893 7246.3 342.4 

412812009 18:18:53 0.194 10.893 7276.3 342.4 

412812009 18:18:54 0.201 10.893 7216.2 342.4 

4/2812009 18:18:55 0.193 10.903 7186.2 342.4 

412812009 18:18:56 0.192 10.893 7066.1 342.4 

412812009 18:18:58 0.198 10.903 7096.1 342.4 

412812009 18:18:59 0.191 10.903 7056.11 361.2!Stable reading Response Time 94 seconds 

Start downscale Response time test (Tum on Nitrogen gas) 

4/28/2009 18:19:00 0.195 10.903 6976 361.2 

4/2812009 18:19:01 0.189 10.903 7006.1 361.2 

4/2812009 18:19:02 0.194 10.903 6886 361.2 

4/2812009 18:19:03 0.196 10.903 6926 361.2 

412812009 18:19:04 0.197 10.903 6945.9 361.2 

4/2812009 18:19:05 0.187 10.903 6946 361.2 

4/2812009 18:19:06 0.198 10.903 6916.1 361.2 

412812009 18:19:07 0.198 10.903 6976.1 361.2 

4/2812009 18:19:09 0.195 10.903 6835.9 361.2 

4/28/2009 18:19:10 0.194 10.903 6716 361.2 

4/2812009 18:19:11 0.197 10.903 6966.1 361.2 

4/2812009 18:19:12 0.188 10.903 6986.1 350.7 

4/2812009 18:19:13 0.201 10.903 7046.2 350.7 

4/2812009 18:19:14 0.185 10.903 7216.3 350.7 

412812009 18:19:15 0.2 10.903 7226.3 350.7 

4/2812009 18:19:16 0.196 10.903 7156.4 350.7 

412812009 18:19:17 0.176 10.903 7166.4 350.7 

412812009 18:19:18 0.177 10.903 7286.5 350.7 

412812009 18:19:20 0.189 10.893 7196.5 350.7 

412812009 18:19:21 0.183 10.853 7116.3 350.7 

412812009 18:19:22 0.184 8.734 7196.3 350.7 

412812009 18:19:23 0.194 3.829 7055.5 350.7 

412812009 18:19:24 0.224 1.556 6965.2 350.7 

412812009 18:19:25 0.255 0.86 6825 333 

412812009 18:19:26 0.257 0.662 6464.9 333 C02 Downscale Response time = 26 seconds 

4/2812009 18:19:27 0.262 0.587 6194.6 333 

4128/2009 18:19:28 0.253 0.51 5844.1 333 

412812009 18:19:29 0.247 0.442 5594 333 

4/2812009 18:19:31 0.24 0.402 5414 333 

4128/2009 18:19:32 0.223 0.382 5333.9 333 

4/28/2009 18:19:33 0.224 0.362 4973.7 333 

412812009 18:19:34 0.206 0.352 4823.9 333 ( 
Test Run 1 Begin. STRATA Version 2.0 

Response Time Demonstration 

Operator: Ken Loder 

Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility 

Location: Unit No. 2 

02 CO2 CO NOx 

0/0 % ppm ppm 

412812009 18:19:35 0.205 0.342 4523.9 333 

4/2812009 18:19:36 0.195 0.332 4244 333 

412812009 18:19:37 0.196 0.332 4104 333 

412812009 18:19:38 0.192 0.322 3954.1 333 

412812009 18:19:39 0.195 0.312 3734.1 333 

4/2812009 18:19:40 0.196 0.312 3614 333 

4/28/2009 18:19:42 0.183 0.302 3413.9 333 

412812009 18:19:43 0.189 0.302 3122 333 

412812009 18:19:44 0.182 0.292 2744.3 333 

412812009 18:19:45 0.191 0.292 2524.5 333 

412812009 18:19:46 0.11:18 0.292 2334 333 

412812009 18:19:47 0.189 0.292 2174.4 332.9 

412812009 18:19:48 0.183 0.282 2024.3 332.9 

412812009 18:19:49 0.182 0.282 1884.5 332.9 

412812009 18:19:50 0.185 0.272 1744.6 173.3 

4/2812009 18:~9:51 0.182 0.272 1624.8 173.3 

412812009 18:19:53 0.187· 0.272 1504.9 173.3 

4/2812009 18:19:54 0.185 0.272 1294.7 173.3 

412812009 18:19:55 0.185 0.262 1135 173.3 

412812009 18:19:56 0.181 0.262 1025 173.3 

412812009 18:19:57 0.183 0.262 915.3 173.3 

4128/2009 18:19:59 0.183 0.262 735 173.3 

4/2812009 18:20:00 0.186 0.262 665.2 173.3 

412812009 18:20:01 0.18 0.262 585.2 173.3 

412812009 18:20:02 0.181 0.262 525.4 173.3 

412812009 18:20:04 0.182 0.262 465.4 173.3 

412812009 18:20:05 0.182 0.252 365.7 173.3 

412812009 18:20:06 0.183 0.252 315.8 173.3 CO Downscale Response time. 86seconds 

( . 412812009 18:20:07 0.18 0.252 275.8 173.3 

4/2812009 18:20:08 0.183 0.252 245.9 173.3 

412812009 18:20:09 0.183 0.252 205.9 173.3 

412812009 18:20:10 0.192 0.252 175.8 9 NOx Downscale Response time. 70 seconds 

412812009 18:20:11 0.185 0.252 155.9! 91Stable Zero response 

4/2812009 18:20:12 0.185 0.252 125.9 9 

412812009 18:20:13 0.188 0.252 105.8 9 

412812009 18:20:15 0.185 0.252 95.7 9 

4/2812009 18:20:16 0.187 0.252 65.8 9 

412812009 18:20:17 0.18 0.252 55.8 9 

412B12oo9 18:20:18 0.187 0.252 45.9 9 

412812009 18:20:19 0.179 0.252 46 9 

412812009 18:20:20 0.188 0.252 35.9 9 

4/2812009 18:20:21 0.175 0.252 36.1 9 

4/2812009 18:20:22 0.182 0.242 26 9 

4/2812009 18:20:23 0.174 0.242 25.9 9 

412812009 18:20:24 0.179 0.242 25.9 9 

412812009 18:20:26 0.18~ 0.242 25.9 9 

412812009 . 18:20:27 0.182 0.2421 15.81 9 Stable Zero response 

412812009 18:20:28 0.184 0.242 15.8 9 

412812009 18:20:29 0.177 0.242 15.8 9 

412812009 18:20:30 0.18 0.242 15.8 9 

4/2812009 18:20:31 0.175 0.242 15.8 9 

412812009 18:20:32 0.1721 0.2321 16 9. Stable Zero response 
Instrumental Test Method Quality Assurance Data 

Rack A 

r 

Response Time (sec.) 

94 

Stack Gas 

Stack Gas I 361.2 

Stack Gas I 7266.1 

343.23 

6903.1 

10.903 0.232 

361.2 9.000 26.61 

6976 15.800 363.81 

--,~ 
Instrumental Test Method Quality Assurance Data 

Stratification Check· Three Point Short Traverse 

" Difference Criteria: < 5.0 % • Single Point, <10.0% - Three Point, >10.0%· Twelve Point 

ppm Difference Criteria: < 0.5 ppm· Single Point. <1.0 ppm - Three Point, >1.0 ppm· Twelve Point 

CEM-QA-KRL.xls 
Instrumental Test Method Quality Assurance Data 

MARTA 163550 

Atlanta, Georgia 

Unit No.2 

10/112008 

"Difference Criteria: <5.0" -Single Point, <10.0" - Three Point, >10.0" - Twelve Point 

ppm Difference Criteria: < 0.5 ppm - Single Point, <1.0 ppm - Three Point, >1.0 ppm - Twelve Point 

CEM-QA-KRL.xls 
c. 

Instrumental Test Method Quality Assurance Data 

MARTA 

Atlanta, Georgia 

Unit No.3 

10/1/2008 

% Difference Criteria: < $.0 % .. Single Point, <10.0% .. Three Point, >10.0% .. Twelve Point 

ppm Difference Criteria: < 0.$ ppm .. Single Point, <1.0 ppm .. Three Point, . >1.0 ppm .. · Twelve Point 

CEM-QA-KRL.xls 
( 
· A:PPENDIX B 

C~mRATI0N DATA· 

; 
(

, .. . . " 

\ 

. . ' I 

( 

l 

1 

\ 
( 

t 

I 

. 

• : ' 

i 

I 

\ 

I 

)'. 

I 

i' 

MAtHESON 

TRI-GAS· 

ask. •• The Gas Professionals CerUficate of Analysis - EPA Protocol Mixtures 

Customer: 

Cylinder Number: 

TRC 

SX45718 

Protocol: 

G1 

Reference # 

RECERT 

3106 Pasadena Freeway 

Pasadena. TX 77603 

713-534-8217 

Lot# 

T110213 

Cylinder Pressure: 1500 PSIG 

Last Analysis Date: 11/18/2008 

00 NOT USE THIS'CYONOER WHENTt:lE PRESSURE fALLS BELOW ., ','.-I.'::' 160 PSIG' ' . , "'"::''''' 

i .' '::,i:; ,,:~< '," ',:~(. 

Expiration Date: 11/1812010 

REPLICATE RESPONSES 

Component Nitrogen Dioxide Date: 41312008 

55.37 

55.63 

55.78 

Mean Cone: 55.2 ppm +/- 2% reI 

BALANCE GAS: 

REFERENCE STANDARDS: 

Component 

Reference Standard: 

Cylinder #: 

Air 

, Nitrogen Dioxide 

SRM 

CAL011583 

Concentration: ' S8.9 ppm 

Exp: Date: 5/112009 

CERTIFIC.ATION INSTRUMENTS 

Component' 

MakelModel: 

Serial Number: 

4easurement Principle: 

Last Calibration: 

Notes: 

NitrOgen Dioxide 

Horiba CLA-510 

42312910013 

CHEMI 

10123/2008 

Date: 1111812008 

54.89 

54.80 

54.88 

This Certification was performed according to EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay & Certification of Gaseou~ 

Calibration Standards September 1997, using procedure G1 andlorG2. 

~~-::-:-~-t. 

Anal¥st: ~.' LING WEN . 

. ( 

Date: 11/1812008 

Manufactured By Specialty Gas Products, a Matheson Tri-Gas Company. Pasadena, Texas. 
~---.-. 

AirD8S 

National Welders" 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE 

Customer: Airgas National Welders, Raleigh, NC Reference # e8-117197 

NSGPO# 6783591 Certification Date: 6/11/2008 

Customer PO# Expiration Date: 6/11/2010 

Cylinder # SG9120995BAL Pressure, psig* 2000 CGA660 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION Product Code: 782405 

METHOD: This standard was analyzed according 10 EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous CalibratiOR Standards: Procedure Gl 

(September 1997) . 

ANALYZED CYLINDER 

Components 

Nitric Oxide 

Carbon Dioxide 

Oxides of Nitrogen - NOX 

Balance - Nitrogen 

REFERENCE STANDARD 

Type/SRM Sample # 

NTRM# 81685 

NTRM # 970511 

INSTRUMENTATION 

InstrumentiModeVSerial # 

Nicolet 6700 AHR0801333 

Certified Concentration 

240.5 ppm 

9.28% 

240.9 ppm 

Cvlinder# 

CC207619 

SG9169360BAL 

Last Date Calibrated 

OS/22108 

AnaMical Accuracy" 

+/-1% 

+1-1% 

+/-1% 

Concentration 

257 ppm NO/N2 

13.837 % C02/N2 

Analvtical Method 

Fourier Transform Infrared 

Analyst: -----T'--"'-----.....:;...;..;..;;.;.~~.........;........J.­

This report states accurately the results af the investigation made upon the materia! s bmitted to the analytical 

laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine objectively the information requested. However, in 

connection with this report, Airgas National Welders shall have no liabilfty In excess of established charge for 

this service. Assayed at Airgas National Welders, 630 United Drive, Durham, NC 27713 (919) 544-3772 

0 00 nol use this standard when cylinder pressure Is below 150 psig. 

o'Analytlcal accuracy Includes typical known error sources which. at least. include precision of the analytical instrument. NSG 020149L 
I 

J 

I 

i 

t 

\ .. 

, , 

",; I' 

", 

, .. 

P. O. Box 120ll 

Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709 

Phone 919/544·3772 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: 'EPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE 

Customer. National Welders, Raleigh, ,Nc'1 Reference # '88-115400 

NSGP~ 6568044 ~ C~rtification Date: 03/05/08 

Customer POf " ..",d Expiration Date: 03/05/10 

Cylinder # ' ,I 

ALM-041223 Pressure, psig* 2000 CGA660 , ' ...... 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION ' (1' 

:;. Product Code: 782406 

METHOD: This standard was analyZedaecordirlg to EPA Traceabm~ Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standard,s: 

Procedure Gt (September 1997) , ,:.' . '. ~ 

ANALYZED CYLINDER 

Componebts Certified Concentration Analytical AQg!ra~-

Nitric Oxide 

Nitrogen Dioxide 

, Carbon Dioxide 

Balance - Nitrogen 

.. .. ~ ......... -....... " ... ~ ....... .. 

REFERENCE STANDARD 

Type/SRM Sample # 

GMIS ( Traceable to NTRM II 81686 ) 

GMIS (Traceableto SRM # 1675b ) 

INSTRUMENTATION 

lostrumenllModellSerial ! 

KVBAnalect EN-844A 

495 PPt.,1 

\' , 

<1.0 PP~' 

9.18 % ';, 

, ~ '.-. ....... 

CVlioder ,. 

CC117479 

CCl17719 

.Last Date Calibrated 

02/13/08 

+/-1% 

QQncentration 

508.5 ppm NOIN2 

14.06 % C021N2 

Anal¥tic§' Method 

Fourier Transform Infrared 

An~ Jesse Powell 

This report states accurately the results of the investigation made upon the material submitted to the analytical 

laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine objectively the information requested. However, in 

connection with this report, Natronal Specialty Gases shalf have no liability in excess of established charge for 

this service. Assayed at National SpecIarty Gases, 630 United Drive, Durham, NC 27713(919) 544-3772 

"00 not use thi$ standard when cylinder pressure lsbelOW 150 pslg. 

:~ 

-Analytical accoracy Includes typical known error souteeS which. at least. Include preCiSion of the analytical Instrument. NSG 020149L 
Airgas. 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 

Grade of Product: EPA Protocol 

Alrllas NatIonal Weldel'S 

630 United Olive 

Dumam, NC 27713 

(1119) 544·3772 

Fax (918) 544-6297 

www.alrgaSJ:llm 

Customer: Airgas National Werders Raleigh,NC 

Part Number: E03N190E15AC2R9 Reference Number: 122·7220899-4 

Cylinder Number: 

Laboratory: 

Analysis Date: 

SG9132445BAL 

ASG • Durham - NC 

Mar 10, 2009 

Cylinder Volume: 

Cylinder Pressure: 

Valve Outlet: 

expiration Date: Mar 10, 2011 

149Cu.Fl 

2015 PSIG 

660 

Certification IXIrformed In accordaACe with 'EPA TraceabllIti Pr()(O(;01 (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procectures "sled. Anelyllcal Methodology does nc>t require correction for 

analyllcallnterferences. This cylinder has II tolaf ane1ytJcaI LlACertliinty as stated below with a confidence level of95%, The!1l a!1l no signirlcent Impurities ...nlch affectlhe use 

of this caUbnlUcn mixture. All conoenttallons are on a volume/Volume basis unless otherwise not&d. . 00 Not Use This C)4inder below 1 SO psIgJ .•. 1 Mega Pascal 

'r ff ':"'.-. 

Total oxides of nitrogen 

CALIBRATION STANDARDS 

Type LotiO Cylinder No Concentration Expiration Date 

NTRM 080613 CC254471 20.09% CARBON DIOXIDEJNITROGEN Jul15,2012 

NTRM 080606 CC255668 1 025.3PPM NITRIC OXIOEINITROGEN May01,2012 

, 

ANALYfICAL EQUIPMENT 

InstrumentIMakelModel Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration 

Nicolet 6700 CO2 FTIR Jan 15.2009 

Nicolet 6700 S02 FTIR Feb 23. 2009 

Paga·1 of 122.7220899-4 

15000lANW 
( 

I 

I 

! 

Airgas 

National Welders" 

-------_ .. 

Airgas NatlOllal Welders 

hftp:IAwNI.!IrgD.toIIl 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE 

Customer: Airgas National Welders, Raleigh, NC Reference # 88-119419 

NSG POI 7041536 Certification Date: 10/1612008 

Customer POI Expiration Date: 10/1612'011 

Cylinder # CC112179 Pressure, psig* 2000 CGA 590 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION Product Code: 781358 

METHOD: This standard was analyzed according 10 EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay end Certification of Gaseous Calibration Slandards: PrOcedure G1 

(September t997) . 

ANALYZED CYLINDER 

Components 

Carbon Dioxide 

Oxygen 

Balance - Nitrogen 

BEFEBENCE STANDARD 

Type/sRM Sample # 

NTRM II 080613 

NTRM(Batch # 060608) 

INSTRUMENTATION 

Instrument/Model/Serial II 

Honba MPA - 510 02 (0.5-25%) 41499150042 

Horiba VIA·510 C02 (0.5-20%) 42399380022 

Certified Concentration 

9.030% 

9.640% 

Cylinder # 

CC254471 

CC207906 

Last Date Calibrated 

09116108 

09/19/08 

Analytical Accuracy** 

+/-1% 

+/-1% 

Concentration 

20.09 % C02fN2 

22.51 % 021N2 

Analytical Method 

ParamagnetiC 

Non-dispersive Infrared 

-- -Richard Sykes 

This report states accurately the results of the investigation made upon the material submitted to the analytical 

laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine objectivelylhe Information requested. However, In 

connection with this report, Airgas National Welders shall have no liability in excess of established charge for 

this service. Assayed atAlrgas National Welders, 630 UnHed Drive, Durham, NC 21713 (919) 544-3n2 

~o nol use this slandard when cylinder pressure Is below 150 psig. 

"Analytical accuracy Includes typical known error sources which. at leas!. include precision of the analytical Instrument. NSG020149L 
:"~ .. 

Ai Fgas , 

National Welders'" 

t 

,1 

t . 

, '.: 

...• 

..... , 

.'> , .... 

:!:: ' ", ,All1la~!faHonaIWtlders 

I\IIR:{~"~ 

CERTIFICA:~'O-: ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE . .', 

Customer: Airgas. National Welders, Raleigh, NC Reference II 88-117793 

NSG po# 6851825 Certification Date: 7/14/2008 

Customer POll Expiration Date: 7/1412011 

:Cylinder # CCt t?038 Pressure, psig* 2000 CGA296 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATIQ,N Product Code: - 781359 

METHOD: This standard was ana\yl\l'4 according to EPA Traceability Prot.)col for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards: Procedure G1 

(September 1997) 

AN81:. YZED CYU~D!;;A 

Compone!llli ' Certified Concentration AnsMical Accur!i!c~ 

Carbon Dioxide 18.93% +1-1% 

Oxygen ''23.95% +1-1% 

Balance - NitrOgen 

, 'N'·~F· 

"':, ..... 

BEf~J:~ANDARO 

Tvpe/SRM Sample /I Cylinder II Qoocentratiotl 

NTRM /I 080613 CC255351 20.09 % C02/N2 

NTRM{Batch II 060608) CC207968 22.51 % 02/N2 

~TBUMENTATION 

Instrument/Model/Serial /I 

Horiba VIA-610 C02 (O.5-20%) 42399380022 

Horiba MPA· 510 02 (0.5-250/0) 41499150042 

last Date Calibrated 

07/11108 

07/11/08 

Analytical Method 

Non-dispers.ive Infrared 

Paramagnetic 

Analyst: __ ~gtJ_~_,==-, -;:f;4I~ ___ ...;.R..;;;I,;;;.;Ch","a .... rd;;...;;;,S ..... yk"""es",,-_ 

This report states accurately the results of th~ investigation made upon the material submitted to the analytical 

laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine objectively the information requested. However, in 

connection with this report, A1rgas National Welders shall have no liability in excess of established charge for 

this service. Assayed at Airgas National Welders, 630 United Drive, Durham. NC 27713 (919) 544-3772 

"'Do nol use this standard wh&n cylinder pressure is below 150 pslg. 

"'Analyllca! accuracy Includes typical known error sources which, at feast. include precision of the analytioa! Instrument NSG 020149L 

(, . 
I 

I I 

I 

( 

"" 

" 

\ . 

P. O. Box 12013 

Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709 

Phone 919/544-3772 

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: 'EPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE 

Customer: Nationa! Welders, Raleigh, NC 

NSG ppJt ....... . 5527438 

Customer' PO# 

cylinder # CC61468 . 

ANAL YTICAL INFORMATION· 

Reference # 88-104791 

Certification Date: 07/12106 

Expiration Date: 

Pressure, psig* 

Product Code: 

07/12[09 

2000 

780481 

eGA 350 

METHOD: ThIs standard W8!l anBlyze(j acccir~!tiQ to EPA Traceabllilyf>rolocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards: 

Procedure G1 (September'1997) . . !~. ~ 

ANALYZED CYLINDER . 

.Components 

Carbon Monoxide 

Balance· Nitrogen 

i 

. . Certified CQnbentratlon 

1 Analytical Accuracy"'" 

'2303 PPm +/·1% 

'i 

• >:." ' .... ,.;. ...... ,;~t.:Ir'~"-.' ..... '_ ..... ;""'" . .$ .... '''-'' _'_'_""_ ...... ~ . --.-.... ~ ..... "',..:: ........ "'_ . '. 

REFERENCE STANDARD 

Type/SRM Sample # 

GMIS (Traceable to SRM # 2638a ) 

INSTRUMENTATION 

lostrumentlModeVSerial # 

Rosemount 880A CO U-1003870 

Cyllnder# .. 

CC61566 

Last Pate Calibrated 

07/12106 

Concentration 

3006 ppm COIN2 

Analytical Method 

Non-dispersive Infrared 

Analyst _"-,a~'t/:::...-_·~-.· __ ~,-____ -=Bn:.:::'a:::..;n.:..P.;..:. M~o::.::o:!!re~ 

This report states accurately the results of the investigation made upoQ Ihe material submitted to the analytical 

laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine o~jectively the Information requested. However. in 

connect/on with this report, National Specialty Gases sHan have no liability In excess of established charge for 

this service. Assayed at National Specialty Gases, 630 United Drive, Durham, NC 27713 (919) 544·3772 

*00 not use this standard when cylinder pressure 1$ below 160 pslg. . 

""Analytical accurecy InclUdes typIcal known error sources which, at leasl,include precision of the analytlcallnslNment NSG 020149L 
I 

i 

I . 

-::' 

'. 

,~. 

I' 

i.: 

i 

! 

i 

-,r 

'" 

P. 0, Box 12013 

Resean::h,Trlangle Park, N.C. 27709 

Phone 9T9/544-3772 

.... . . . ... ,.~. ", ,. . . 

> CERTIFICAtE OF ANALYSIS: 'cPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE 

" Customer: Na~iaual Welders, R~leigh. NO Referenc;e # 88,:106430 . 

. NSG. PO# •... ~~~i~.,.;" '",", "~""'''''' ,... .... CeH;.I~~tiqn Date: 02lQ5/07 

Custo/iler,P0# . ·r." . ":...1 ExP.i,f?tiqnDa1e: 02/05/10. 

CYlinderlt XC01'6125B . :i. Pr:essure.1Psig* 290~ " " GGA ~50 :,' ,).; ,~. ' ,'::;' ..;.\: .', .. ,' " 

ANALYTICAL 'NFORMArJON: .'. . Product:Cpde: 780499 .. 

METHOD: rhl!~tahdard was .. aP~iyZed,.~~ordin~ k:; Ef:'A. •. :tr.'~ab~r; . Protocol for Assay' and Certification of Gl!I$l!)ous Callbratton Standards: 

,Procedure G,!:·{Septembei'1997). . " ., .. ", ' " . 

ANALYZEqtYLlNDER: '. '::' . " 

Componenf~,' Certified COncentration Analytical Accuracy'" ,.~, . :'~ , ' _.. ( 

~ .:", .(.:. " , . 

Carbon MO~pxide '. . 45704~ 

", "1i. 

BaranGe - Nttrp9~f{ . ~'. i ~ 

.~'':;'. :.~~;I·;{14:' :i~".~~,~, .. ~~;~~.~ 

BEE~R~NCE STANDARD 

TypelSRM~ample # . 

, GMIS ( Traceable to SRM # 2638a ) 

INSTRLJMENTATION 

Instrument!M9delfSerial # ", . . ~ ~. 

Rc;>semount:680A CO· U-1003870 

Cylinder!., 

SG9138239BAL 

Last Oate Callbrateg 

01/f8!o7 

+/-1% 

Concentration 

4970 ppm COIN2 

Analytical MethOd 

i . Non-dispersive Infrared 

Analyst 47 0' ! B~'n P. Moore 

This report states accurately the results of the Investigation made upon the _I Submitted to the analytical 

laboratory. Every effort has been made to detennlne objectively the Information requested. However. In 

connection with thIs report. National Specialty Gases shan have no liabHity in excess of established charge for 

this ServIce. Assayed at National Specialty Gases, 630 United Drive, Durham, NC 2n1.3 (919) 544-3772 

·00 not use this standard when cylinder pressure Is below 150 pslg. 

··Analytlcal accuracy Includes typical known error sources whIch, at least. include precIsion of the analyticlilllnwumenl 

( 
P. O. Bo)( 12013 

Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709 

phone 919/544-3772 

CERTIFICATE OF ANAL YSfS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE 

Customer: Nationa! Welders. Raleigh. NC Reference # 88-105959 -., 

NSG PO# 5?85931 Certification Date: 09/O6{O6 

Expiration Date: 09/06/09 

Cyfinder# CC18971 Pressure, pslg* 1700 CGA350 

ANALYTICAL INFORMATION Product Code: 780492 

METHOO: This sl&ndard was anatyzed according to EPA Traceability P~tooOllor Assay anel Certification at Gaseous CaHbratlonSlandaros: 

Procedure Gt (September 1991) 

ANAlYZED CYLINDER 

CQmponents 

Carbon Monoxide 

Balance . Nitrogen 

'" ~': . , ... ~.- ..... 

REEERE$ice STANDARP 

Type/SRM Sample # 

GMIS (Traceable to SRM #I 2639A ) 

INSTRUMENTATION 

InstrumenVModellSerlal # 

Rosemount S80A CO U·100387Q 

Certified Concentration 

8875 ppm 

Cylinder # 

CC193754 

Last Date Calibrated 

08/11/06 

Analytical Accuracy** 

+/-1% 

Concentration 

9770 ppm CO/N2 

Analytjcal Method 

Non-dispersive Infrared 

Analyst: ~---_. Neal Bernard 

----~------------------------------ This report states accurately the results of the investigation made upon the material submitted to the analytical 

laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine obJectively the Information requested. However, in 

connection with this report, Natronal SpeCialty Gasas shall have no liability In excess of established charge for 

this selVlce. Assayed at Nalional Specialty Gases, 630 United Drive, Durham, NO 27713 (919) 544-3772 

*00 not use !his sl&ndard when cylincler pressure Is below 150 pslg. 

.... Analytlcal accuracy includes typical known error sources which. at least. Include precision of the analytical Instrument. NSG020149L 

· .. · ~.. :'. 

',: ~':~. · ,. , ...... 
c. ·
· .. 

APPENP[XB 

CALIBRATION DATA , I 
, 

i" 

( 

,'\ . 
Method 20 Interference Check 

Date: 1/2/2004 

Analyst: Jeff Thompson 

Analyzer Type: California Analytical 200 

Gas Monitored: 02 

Analyzer Serial Number: 1N03013 

Analyzer Span: 0-25% 

TRC Number 3 

Linearity Check 

Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Reading Difference % Difference 

Zero Gas - N2 0.0 0.04 0.038 0.152 

Mid-level Gas XC030412 O2 11.1 11.025 -0.075 -0.3 

High-Level Gas CC012605 O2 20.64 20.565 -0.075 -0.3 

Interference Test· 

Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Reading Difference % Difference 

CO (500 ± 50 ppm) AAL21337 CO 601 0.039 0.039 0.156 

S02 (200 ± 20 ppm) ALM039889 S02 900.7 

NOx It NOx 443.6 0.003 0.003 0.012 

C02 (10.0 + 1%) .. CO2 18.48 

(NOx, S02, & C02 combined in one cylinder) 

Sum of the % Difference must be :5 2% of Span SUMI 0.012 

All testing Is In accordance with USEPA CFR 40, Part 60, Appendix A. Method 20. 

For calculations a true zero Is assumed 

TRC 

TRC Environmental COrporation 
Method 20 Interference Check 

Date: 1/2/2004 

Analyst: Jeff Thompson 

Analyzer Type: California Analytical 200 

Gas Monitored: CO2 

Analyzer Serial Number: 1N03013 

Analyzer Span: 0-20% 

TRC Number 3 

Linearity Check 

Cylinder Number Gas Concentration 

Zero Gas . N2 0.0 

Mid-Level Gas XC030412 CO2 9.04 

High-Level Gas CC012605 CO2 17.39 

. Interference Test 

Cylinder Number Gas Concentration 

CO (500 ± 50 ppm) AAL21337 CO 601 

S02 (200 ± 20 ppm) XC028891 S02 219.5 

NOx XC030645 NOx 215.2 

Sum of the % Difference must be =:. 2% of Span 

All testing is in accordance with USEPA CFR 40, Part 60, AppendiX A. Method 20 . 

• For calculations a true zero Is assumed 

Reading Difference 

0.01 0.007 

9.029 -0.011 

17.388 -0.002 

Reading Difference 

0.001 0.001 

0.003 0.003 

0.003 0.003 

SUMI 

TRC 

TRC Environmental Corporation 

% Difference 

0.035 

-0.055 

-0.01 

% Difference 

0.005 

0.015 

0.015 

0.007 

, 
/. 

,. 

c. 

Method 20 Interference Check 

Date: 1/5/2004 

Analyst: Jeff Thompson 

Analyzer Type : API200AH 

Gas Monitored: NOx 

Analyzer Serial Number: 458 

Analyzer Span: 0-100ppm 

TRCNumber 5 

Linearity Check 

Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Reading 

Zero Gas - N2 0.0 0.15 

Low-Level Gas XC023711 NOx 23.44 22.67 

Mid-Level Gas XC030412 NOx 55.2 55.95 

High-Level Gas CC012605 NOx 84.3 84.6 

. Interference Test 

Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Reading· 

CO (500 .t 50 ppm) AAL21337 CO 601 0.81 

S02 (200.t 20 ppm) XC028891 S02 219.5 0.55 

02 (20.9 + 1%) CC012605 02lC02 20.64 0.31 

C02 (10.0 + 1%) II " 17.39 

Sum of the % Difference must be ~ 2% of Span 

All testing Is In accordance with USEPA CFR 40, Pari 60. Appendix A. Method 20 • 

• For calculations a true zero Is assumed 

SUM Is absolute value of the pecen! difference 

TRC 

Difference 

0.15 

-0.77 

0.75 

0.3 

. Difference 

0.81 

0.55 

0.31 

SUMI 

TRC Environmental Corporation 

% Difference 

0.15 

-0.77 

0.75 

0.3 

% Difference 

0.81 

0.55 

0.31 

1.67 
Method 20 Interference Check 

Date: 101712005 

Analyst: Wayne D. Abbott 

Analyzer Type: Thermo Environmental-Model 48 

Gas Monitored: CO 

Analyzer Serial Number: 48-18572-179 

Analyzer Span: 0-100 

TRC Number 5 

Linearity Check 

Cylinder Number Gas Concentration 

Zero Gas N2 0.0 

Low-Level Gas XC028168 CO 29.8 

Mid-Level Gas XC031970 CO 64.17 

High-Level Gas CC10965 CO 88.9 

. Interference Test 

Cylinder Number Gas Concentration 

O2 (20.9 :!J%) CC28790 O2 20.9 

CO2 (10.0::t 1%) " CO2 17.83 

S02 (200 ::t 20 ppm) XC027601 S02 223.0 

NOx XC016139 NOx 224 

Sum of the % Difference must be .5. 2% of Span 

Al1 testing Is In accordance with USEPA CFR 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Method 20, 

• For calculations a true zero Is assumed 

Reading Difference % Difference 

0.01 0.01 0.01 

28.63 -1.21 -1.21 

62.7-1 -1.46 -1.46 

88.4 -0.5 -0.5 

Reading Difference % Difference 

(02 and CO2 readings combined) 

-0.07 -0.07 -0.07 

-0.03 -0.03 -0.03 

0.1 0.1 0.1 

SUMI 0 

TRC 

TRC Environmental Corporation 


MARTA Perry Catalyst time & Temp 04/28/09 

tOLE TEMPS 

RUN # 1 CAT#2 

TIME PRE POST 

6:30PM 386 430 

6:35PM 374 424 

6:40PM 375 430 

6:45PM 383 438 

6:50PM 387 442 

6:55PM 387 447 

7:0·0PM 393 448 

7:05PM 386 426 

7:10PM 376 425. 

1DLE TEMPS 

RUN#2CAT#3 

TIME PRE POST 

8:15PM 420 455 

8:20PM 425 456 

8:25PM 408 439 

8:30PM 415 451 

8:35PM 425 457 

8:40PM 427 467 

IDLE TEMPS 

RUN#3CAT#1 

TIME PRE POST 

9:15PM 387 410 

9:20PM 391 423 

9:25PM 382 415 

9:30PM 388 410 

9:35PM 386 408 

9:40PM 382 410 

LOADED TEMPS 

RUN # 1 CAT # 1 

TIME PRE POST 

1 0:50PM 545 595 

11:00PM 516 563 

11:10PM 522 567 

11 :20PM 522 566 

11 :30PM 529 568 

11 :40PM 505 553 

LOADED TEMPS 

RUN#2 CAT#3 

TIME PRE 

12:02AM 545 

12:10AM 538 

12:20AM 580 

12:30AM 543 

12:40AM 552 

12:50AM 546 

01:00AM 517 

POST 

575 

580 

619 

573 

640 

590 

607 

{. 

SMITH ALDRIDGE, . INC. 

Environmental Consultants 

May 26, 2009 

Mr. Ross Winne 

Air Protection Branch 

Georgia Environmental Protection Division 

Department of Natural Resources 

4244 International Parkway 

Suite 120 

Atlanta, Georgia 30354 

RECEIVED 

MAY 272009 

ISMP 

Subject: MARTA - Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility 

Perry Boulevard - Fulton County, Georgia 

NOx and CO Performance Testing Results 

Dear Mr. Winne: 

On behalf of Atlanta Gas Light Company, Smith Aldridge, Inc. is submitting two (2) 

copies of the performance testing reports (along with the appropriate test report summary 

forms) for Natural Gas Compressor Engine #1, Engine #2, and Engine #3 at the MARTA 

- Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility conducted on April 28-29, 

2009. This testing was conducted as part of conforming to the provisions of Consent 

Order No. EPD-AQC-6032. 

The testing followed the procedures detailed in the test protocol developed and submitted 

to Georgia EPD in advance of the test program. One sixty-minute measurement of the 

emission rate of NOx and CO was determined at peak load for each Natural Gas 

Compressor Engine #1 and Engine #3 (Run ID Ul-M and U3-M). One thirty-minute 

measurement of the emission rate of NO x and CO was also determined at idle for each of 

the three engines (Run ID U1-I, U2·I, and U3-I). 

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please don't hesitate to 

contact me at 404-255-0928 (ext 112) or at csmith@smithaldridge.com. 

Sincerely, 

President 

crb~.Ph.D. 

Enclosure: Two Copies - Testing Report 

GAEPD Test Report Summary Forms 

cc: Terry Ryland - AGL 

Nicole Miles - AGL 

MAII-ING ADDRESS: P.D.Box 420495 • ATI-ANTA, GEORGIA 30342 

6000 LAKE F'ORREST DRIVE' SUITE 3BS • ATI-ANTA, GEORGIA 30328 

DF"F"ICE: 404.255.0928 • F'AX: 404.2S5.0948 • WWW.SMITHAI-ORIOCilE.COM