alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


	 	Bill Griffiths


Chairman, President &


Chief Executive Officer







 


1800 West Loop South


Suite 1500


Houston, Texas 77027


Main: 713-961-4600


 


CONFIDENTIAL


 


 


November 1, 2019


 


Scott Zuehlke


3318 Mallard Run Court


Katy, TX 77494


 


Dear Scott,


 


I am pleased to offer you the position
of Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer for Quanex Building Products Corporation (the “Company”),
reporting directly to the Chief Executive Officer, effective on November 1, 2019 (“Effective Date”). Responsibilities
of this position will be consistent with what was discussed with you during our several meetings.


 


Your total compensation will include the
following:


 


		1.	Base Salary. Your base salary will be $12,692.30 paid bi-weekly (annualized at $330,000).



 


		2.	Annual Incentive Award (AIA). The AIA target for your position will be 55% of your base
salary and a maximum of 110%.



 


		3.	Long Term Incentive Award (LTI). You will also be eligible to continue to receive a Long
Term Incentive Award in December 2019 based upon approval of the Compensation and Management Development Committee. The LTI target
value for your position will be $390,000. The LTI award is comprised of grants from the Omnibus Incentive Plan that typically include
a mix of restricted stock, Performance Restricted Stock and Performance Shares.



 


		4.	Stock ownership. You will have 3 years from your date of promotion to accumulate 200% of
your base salary in Quanex shares.



 


		5.	Benefits. You will be entitled to the level of company health and welfare benefits that
you currently participate in today.



 


		6.	Principal Office. The Quanex Building Products Corporation corporate headquarters, located
at 1800 West Loop South, Suite 1500 Houston, Texas 77027 will be your principal office.



 


Your entitlement to any of the benefits
outlined herein is contingent on your continued employment at the time. Your employment may be terminated by either you or the
Company at any time. This agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Texas.


 






     


     


    

 


Scott, I believe that you will help provide
the leadership we need to meet the long-term needs of our team to deliver the results our owners deserve. I look forward to working
with you in your new role.


 


	Sincerely,	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Bill
    Griffiths	 	 
	Bill Griffiths	 	 
	Chairman, President & Chief Executive
    Officer	 	 




 


 


	ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/
    Scott Zuehkle	 	November 1, 2019
	Scott Zuehkle	 	Date
#### § 401.91 Removal of obstructions.

The Corporation or the Manager may, at the owner's expense, move any vessel, cargo, or thing that obstructs or hinders transit on any part of the Seaway.

[61 FR 19552, May 2, 1996, as amended at 65 FR 52915, Aug. 31, 2000]
March 5, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Airlines’ Application for an Exemption 

(Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas – Aguascalientes, Mexico) 

(Docket DOT-OST-2015-0047)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding American 

Airlines’ Application for an Exemption (DFW-AGU). We received no objections.

Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited allocation of the Exemption 

requested in the Application.

Sincerely, 

Howard Kass

Vice President – Regulatory Affairs

Robert A. Wirick,

Managing Director, Regulatory and International 

Affairs

Abigail Donovan

Director, Congressional and Federal Affairs

1101 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 (202) 326-5153 Fax: (202) 898-4810
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on March 5, 2015, I caused to be served a copy of the foregoing 

Letter by email upon those addressees listed below:

englets@state.gov (Department of State)

cristinasa@state.gov (Department of State)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

laura.remo@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.s.duncan@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

perkmann@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

jeremy.ross@alaskaair.com (Alaska)

dheffernan@cozen.com (Counsel for Alaska)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Southwest)

leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

thomas.ting@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Frontier)

slachter@cozen.com (Counsel for Frontier)

rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

______________________

Abigail Donovan
#### § 2.20 Territorial sea baseline.

*Territorial sea baseline* means the line defining the shoreward extent of the territorial sea of the United States drawn according to the principles, as recognized by the United States, of the Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone, 15 U.S.T. 1606, and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), 21 I.L.M. 1261. Normally, the territorial sea baseline is the mean low water line along the coast of the United States.

Note to § 2.20:

Charts depicting the territorial sea baseline are available for examination in accordance with § 1.10-5 of this chapter.
§ 401.14 Anchors, Anchor Marking Buoys. ( a ) Every vessel shall have their anchors cleared and ready to be released prior to entering the Seaway.
( b ) Every vessel shall deploy the anchor marking buoy when dropping an anchor in Seaway waters (designated Seaway anchorages exempt).
( c ) Every vessel shall be equipped with operational anchor(s) suitably rigged for immediate release, holding, and retrieval. Every vessel shall be responsible for locating and retrieving any anchor deployed by the vessel and shall do so in a timely manner so as not to delay transit of vessels.
[79 FR 12659, Mar. 6, 2014, as amended at 85 FR 15950, Mar. 20, 2020; 86 FR 15412, Mar. 23, 2021; 88 FR 14267, Mar. 8, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.1

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | RELM Wireless Corporation            
| |                                      
| |                                      
| | /s/DAVIDP. STOREY                    
| | David  P. Storey                     
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7195

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

YVONNE RENE LEIGH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-94-406-A, CA-97-1087-AM)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 17, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yvonne Rene Leigh, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. We decline to address the district

court’s comment that Appellant’s § 2255 motion was barred by the

one-year limitations period imposed by the Antiterrorism and

Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1998), because we find that the district court correctly denied

Appellant’s motion on alternative grounds. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the district

court’s finding that Appellant’s downward departure claims could

not be raised in a § 2255 proceeding and its determination that her

sentencing claim was barred because it had been raised on direct

appeal. United States v. Leigh, Nos. CR-94-406-A; CA-97-1087-AM

(E.D. Va. July 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**ALLIANCEGAMING CORPORATION**

**FORM 10-Q**

**March 31,2005**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Alliance Gaming Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven M. Des Champs,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350that, to my knowledge:

 

1. The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  May 9,2005

 

 
| /s/ Steven M. Des Champs                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven M. Des Champs                          |
| Senior Vice President and                     |
| Chief Financial Officer                       |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer) |

 

----
§ 334.6 Datum. ( a ) Geographic coordinates expressed in terms of latitude or longitude, or both, are not intended for plotting on maps or charts whose reference horizontal datum is the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83), unless such geographic coordinates are expressly labeled NAD 83. Geographic coordinates without the NAD 83 reference may be plotted on maps or charts referenced to NAD 83 only after application of the appropriate corrections that are published on the particular map or chart being used.
( b ) For further information on NAD 83 and National Service nautical charts please contact: Director, Coast Survey (N/CG2), National Ocean Service, NOAA, 1315 East-West Highway, Station 6147, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282.
[60 FR 15233, Mar. 23, 1995]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# SUMMARY:

                        A Notice of Intent was published in the                         **Federal Register,**                         Vol. 64, No. 215, Monday, November 8, 1999, P. 60764, announcing the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement for the South Fourth of July Timber Sale. Since the publication of the Notice of Intent, the name of the proposal has been changed to the South Fourth of July Ecosystem Restoration Project. Publication of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements will be under that name.                    

# DATES:

June 2, 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions concerning the proposed action and Environmental Impact Statement should be directed to Barbara Levesque at the Salmon-Cobalt Ranger District, Salmon-Challis National Forest, RR2 Box 600, Salmon, Idaho 83467.

George Matejko,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 00-14582 Filed 6-13-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6872

REGINALD TERRELL LEACH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD JONES, Superintendent; NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate Judge. (CA-96-367) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Reginald Terrell Leach, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Kendrick Cleveland, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Because the parties had consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 1998), the magistrate's recommendation entered on April 25, 1997, should have been an order and judgment of dismissal. In correcting this oversight, the magistrate judge treated Appellant's objections to the recommendation as a motion for reconsideration. Because we find the error, if any, was harmless, we dismiss the appeal. 2 PER CURIAM:Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinions and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Leach v. Jones , No. CA-96-367 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 25 & May 27, 1997). We also deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 80.1380 Quillayute River, WA.

A line drawn from the seaward extremity of the Quillayute River Entrance East Jetty to the overhead power cable tower charted on James Island; thence a straight line through Quillayute River Entrance Light 3 to the shoreline.
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  SUPP. C – Library

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/SUPP. C – Library SUPP. C – LibraryADR2022-02-18T17:03:03-05:00
			
			SUPP. C – LibraryLinks in the preceding chapters provided direct access to many materials. The table below collects all of the referenced materials and sorts them into general topics for readers to browse and download.
Topic
ItemAcquisition Systems
See Supplement B, Acquisition SystemsExecutive Orders
EO 12979 – Agency Procurement ProtestsForms
ADR Agreement – ODRA DisputeADR Agreement – ODRA ProtestASBCA FormsCBCA ADR AgreementNAVSEA H-ClauseNIH Model CRADA w/ Tiered Discussion (Art. 11.1)Settlement Agreement – ODRA DisputeSettlement Agreement – ODRA ProtestIADRWG Materials
Confidentiality Guidance of 2000Confidentiality Guidance of 2006Guide for Federal Employee MediatorsOrders and Policies (Samples)
NAVFACINST 11013.40A – NAVFAC Partnering SystemSECNAVINST 5800-13A, DON ADR PolicySECNAVINST 5800-15, ArbitrationProcedural Regulations
See Supplement B, ForumsStatutes (ADR Specific)
ADRA of 1990ADRA of 1996ADRA of 1998ADRA of 1996 (US Code Version)Surveys & Studies
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Study of Arbitration (2005)AASHTO Survey on the use of DRBs (2013)Statistics – ASBCA Cases (Most Recent)Statistics – ODRA Cases (2013)Training Materials
ADR TechniquesAF Extended DebriefingsASBCA’s ADR GuideFactors to Consider for Using ADRFiscal Aspects of SettlementsHow to Engage in ADRMaster NCE Library Book ListThe Players Involved in Conflict ManagementUSACE Partnering Pamphlet 4 Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508