alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Plan02d(tpy)PRP18b(tpy)Net ChangeFrom Plan02d toPRP18b(Percent)Point 117,806 110,109 -7Area 15,192 19,663 29On-Road Mobile 38,535 9,728 -75Off-Road Mobile 76,637 49,677 -35Oil & Gas 14,725 34,142 132Road Dust 0 0 0Fugitive Dust 0 0 0Windblown Dust 0 0 0Anthro Fire 782 484 -38Natural Fire 8,372 8,372 0Source CategoryStatewide NOxWyoming Planning and Preliminary Reasonable ProgressEmission InventoriesWyoming NOx Emission Inventory - 2002 and 2018,,Biogenic 15,925 15,925 0Total287,974 248,100 -14WRAP TSS as of 10/21/09Region Scenario Year Point Anthro Fire Natural Fire All Fire Biogenic AreaWRAP AreaO&G Off-ShoreOn-RoadMobileOff-RoadMobileRoadDustFugitiveDust WB DustNitrogen Oxides (gas)WY Plan02d 2002 117806.1006 782.034 8371.647 15925.088 15191.75 14725.27 38535.175 76636.61WY Prp18b 2018 110109.2205 483.525 8371.645 15925.088 19663.12 34142.22 9727.7425 49676.978
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1997 2 NASS, USDA

Crop Summary: Production, United States,












Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1997 15 NASS, USDA

USDA Announces Agricultural Outlook Forum ‘97

February 24 and 25, 1997

Omni Shoreham Hotel, Washington, D.C.

An era of freer markets under the 1996 Farm Bill has begun. For an expert assessment of the

impact, attend the Outlook Forum. Top speakers will discuss the 1997 farm outlook, prospects

to 2005, risk management, concentration issues, market stability, world food security,

marketing high-valued exports and more. Plan now to attend. For program and registration
<PAGE>

Litton Loan Servicing LP

January 10, 2003

As of December 31, 2002, Litton Loan Servicing LP (the Company)
has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
Americas Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.
As of and for this same period, Litton Loan Servicing LP had in
effect a fidelity bond in the amount of $15,000,000 and an errors
and omissions policy in the amount of $15,000,000.

In January 2003, the Company identified certain custodial accounts
that had not been reconciled timely during the year ended December
31, 2002. Upon notification of this issue, management immediately
began an effort to bring these custodial accounts current. The
Company has currently reconciled all custodial accounts, and has
implemented controls to ensure the timely and accurate
reconciliation of custodial accounts.



/s/ Larry B. Litton, Sr.
-------------------------
Larry B. Litton, Sr.
President & CEO
January 10, 2003

/s/ Janice McClure
------------------
Janice McClure
Senior Vice President
January 10, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Advaxis, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:



(1)   the Report of the Company filed today fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



|Date: February 13, 2013 | /s/ Mark J. Rosenblum
|----------------------- | ---------------------
|                        | Name:                
|                        | Title:
Exhibit 99.2

                            RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Relm Wireless Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
P. Kelly, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ William P. Kelly
------------------------------------
William P. Kelly
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
§ 385.12 Pilot projects. ( a ) The Plan includes pilot projects to address uncertainties associated with certain components such as aquifer storage and recovery, in-ground reservoir technology, seepage management, and wastewater reuse. The purpose of the pilot projects is to develop information necessary to better determine the technical feasibility of these components prior to development of a Project Implementation Report.
( b ) Prior to initiating activities on a pilot project, the Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall develop a Project Management Plan as described in § 385.24.
( c ) Project Implementation Reports shall not be necessary for pilot projects. Prior to implementing a pilot project, the Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall prepare a Pilot Project Design Report. ( 1 ) The Pilot Project Design Report shall contain the technical information necessary to construct the pilot project including engineering and design, cost estimates, real estate analyses, and appropriate NEPA documentation.
( 2 ) The Pilot Project Design Report shall include a detailed operational testing and monitoring plan necessary to develop information to assist in better determining the technical feasibility of certain components prior to development of a Project Implementation Report.
( 3 ) In accordance with § 385.18, the Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall provide the public with opportunities to review and comment on the draft Pilot Project Design Report.
( 4 ) The Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall approve the final Pilot Project Design Report in accordance with applicable law.
( d ) Upon completion of operational testing and monitoring, the Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall, in consultation with the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Commerce, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, the Seminole Tribe of Florida, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, prepare a Pilot Project Technical Data Report, documenting the findings and conclusions from the operational testing and monitoring of the pilot project. The purpose of the Pilot Project Technical Data Report is to help assess the viability of technology and to assist in the development of the full-scale project. The Corps of Engineers and the non-Federal sponsor shall also consult with the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force in preparing the report. ( 1 ) In accordance with § 385.22(b), the draft Pilot Project Technical Data Report shall be externally peer reviewed.
( 2 ) In accordance with § 385.18, the public shall be provided with opportunities to review and comment on the draft Pilot Project Technical Data Report.
( 3 ) The final Pilot Project Technical Data Report shall be made available to the public.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACMAT Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Henry W. Nozko, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


       /s/ Henry W. Nozko, Jr.


       Henry W. Nozko, Jr.
       Chief Executive Officer
       May 15, 2003


                                       21
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2764

JOAN MARCOTT; JOCELYN "NINA" SPINALI,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

FILOMENA HARTFORD; CELESTE ROSEBORO; LENDA

HARRIS WATTERS; KELLY CLARK; MARRIE ROSE

MILLER,

Plaintiffs,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JANET RENO, United

States Attorney General; KATHLEEN HAWK, Director, Bureau of Prisons; DAN EDWARDS, Director

of Alderson FPC Operations; TOM HARVEY, Financial Responsibility Program Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District

Judge. (CA-94-675-1)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joan Marcott, Jocelyn Spinali, Appellants Pro Se. Michael Lee

Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing their

declaratory judgment action. Appellants' case was referred to a

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised

Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order

based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellants

failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellants have waived appellate

review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
      32.2




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2002, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Christopher Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Christopher
      Ryan


Christopher
      Ryan


Chief
      Financial Officer





Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.445 Maneuvering performance capability. ( a ) A tankship owner or operator shall ensure that maneuvering tests in accordance with IMO Resolution A.751(18), sections 1.2, 2.3-2.4, 3-4.2, and 5 (with Explanatory Notes in MSC/Circ.644) have been conducted by July 29, 1997. Completion of maneuvering performance tests must be shown by— ( 1 ) For a foreign flag tankship, a letter from the flag administration or an authorized classification society, as described in § 157.04 of this part, stating the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section have been met; or
( 2 ) For a U.S. flag tankship, results from the vessel owner confirming the completion of the tests or a letter from an authorized classification society, as described in § 157.04 of this part, stating the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section have been met.
( b ) If a tankship undergoes a major conversion or alteration affecting the control systems, control surfaces, propulsion system, or other areas which may be expected to alter maneuvering performance, the tankship owner or operator shall ensure that new maneuvering tests are conducted as required by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) If a tankship is one of a class of vessels with identical propulsion, steering, hydrodynamic, and other relevant design characteristics, maneuvering performance test results for any tankship in the class may be used to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) The tankship owner or operator shall ensure that the performance test results, recorded in the format of Appendix 6 of the Explanatory Notes in MSC/Circ.644, are prominently displayed in the wheelhouse.
( e ) Prior to entering the port or place of destination and prior to getting underway, the tankship master shall discuss the results of the performance tests with the pilot while reviewing the anticipated transit and the possible impact of the tankship's maneuvering capability on the transit.
[CGD 91-045, 61 FR 39790, July 30, 1996; 61 FR 41685, Aug. 9, 1996]
Case 1:22-cv-22363-RNS Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2022 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2) 

Civil Action No. 1 :22-cv-22363-RNS 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

(This sectio11 should 11ot be filed with tile court u11less required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (1)) 

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) "Best Choice" and all other Defendants Identified in Sch. A 

was received by me on (date) 10/14/2022

Date: 

D I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date} ; or 

D I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) 

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, 

on (date} ------- , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or 

D I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is 

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date} ;r 

vU Other:

My fees are$ 

I cenify that per this Coun's order on Sept. 16, 2022 (D.E. 22), I sent an email with a link to 

https://fordbanister.com/case-no-22-cv-22363-rns-shenzhen-dejiayun/ by email to the email 

addresses contained in Schedule A (D.E. 18-3) and any email address provided for Defendants by 

third panies with: Summons (D.E. 33); Complaint (D.E. 1), Schedule "A" (D.E. 18-3) on Oct. 15, 

2022. 

0.00 for travel and $ 0.00 for services, for a total of$ 0.00 

I declare under penalty of perjmy that this information is true. 

10/17/2022 Lydia Pittaway 

Server's signature 

Lydia Pittaway, Attorney 

Printed name and title 

305 Broadway - Floor 7, New York, NY 10007 

Server's address 

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: 

Case 1:22-cv-22363-RNS Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 335.2 Authority.

Under authority delegated from the Secretary of the Army and in accordance with section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (CWA) and section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, hereinafter referred to as the Ocean Dumping Act (ODA), the Corps of Engineers regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of disposal into ocean waters. Section 404 of the CWA requires public notice with opportunity for public hearing for discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. and that discharge sites can be specified through the application of guidelines developed by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in conjunction with the Secretary of the Army. Section 103 of the ODA requires public notice with opportunity for public hearing for the transportation for disposal of dredged material for disposal in ocean waters. Ocean disposal of dredged material must be evaluated using the criteria developed by the Administrator of EPA in consultation with the Secretary of the Army. Section 103(e) of the ODA provides that the Secretary of the Army may, in lieu of permit procedures, issue regulations for Federal projects involving the transportation of dredged material for ocean disposal which require the application of the same criteria, procedures, and requirements which apply to the issuance of permits. Similarly, the Corps does not issue itself a CWA permit to authorize Corps discharges of dredged material or fill material into U.S. waters, but does apply the 404(b)(1) guidelines and other substantive requirements of the CWA and other environmental laws.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4853

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1568 South Green Road in South Euclid,

Ohio, as the ‘‘Arnold C. D’Amico Station’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4853 EH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 1568 South Green Road in South Euclid, Ohio,

4 and known as the South Euclid Station, shall be known

5 and designated as the ‘‘Arnold C. D’Amico Station’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Arnold C. D’Amico Station’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 12,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4853

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States

Postal Service located at 1568 South Green Roadin South Euclid, Ohio, as the ‘‘Arnold C.D’Amico Station’’.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

The Board ofDirectors and StockholdersArray BioPharma Inc.:

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-100955) onForm S-8 of Array BioPharma Inc. of our reports dated September 12, 2007, with respect to the balance sheets of ArrayBioPharma Inc. (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the relatedstatements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss)and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30,2007, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of June 30, 2007 and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007, which reports appear inthe June 30, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Array BioPharma Inc.

Our report dated September 12, 2007, contains anexplanatory paragraph that states, effective July 1, 2005, the Company changedits method of accounting for stock-based compensation.

                                       /s/ KPMG LLP

Boulder, Colorado September 12, 2007

 

----
EXHIBIT 99-2

CONTACT:
  Richard Becht
  (716) 655-3800


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


          ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION REPORTS FIRST QUARTER RESULTS


     EAST AURORA, N.Y., October 20, 1999 -- Acme Electric Corporation
(NASDAQ:ACEE) announced today that, for the first quarter ended October 2,
1999, consolidated net sales were $19,271,000, with net income of $942,000,
compared with net sales of $22,378,000 and net income of $522,000 for the
comparable period in the prior year.

     Robert J. McKenna, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, stated that,
"We continue our strong commitment to new product development and the
search for new OEM relationships.  Several new programs in the early stages
of development are expected to more than fill the void left by the loss of
Cisco's business."

     Founded in 1917, Acme Electric Corporation is a leader in the design
and manufacture of power conversion equipment for electronic and electrical
systems for industrial, commercial, residential, and military and aerospace
applications.  Corporate headquarters are in East Aurora, N.Y., with
operations in Cuba, N.Y., Lumberton, N.C., and Tempe, Ariz.

                                  # # # #

<PAGE>

ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION

Comparative Analysis
(in thousands, except per share data)

                                For the 13 Weeks Ended
                                 10/02/99    10/03/98

Net Sales                         $19,271     $22,378

Net Income                           $942        $522

Net Income Per Common Share
  Basic                              $.19        $.10
  Diluted                            $.18        $.10

Weighted Average Number of shares
  Outstanding Used to Compute
  Income Per Common Share:
    Basic                           5,072       5,054
    Diluted                         5,121       5,068