alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2001 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2001 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2001 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2001 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2001 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2001 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2001 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:00-cr-00807-FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2001 Page 8 of 8
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of Palm, Inc.**

PalmComércio de Aparelhos Eletrônicos Ltda. (Brazil) 

Palm Europe Limited (UK) 

Palm Italy S.r.l. (Italy) 

Palm France SAS (France) 

Palm Germany GmbH (Germany) 

Palm Global Operations Ltd. (Ireland) 

Palm Asia Pacific Limited (Hong Kong) 

Palm Ireland Investment (Ireland)

Palm Latin America, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.) 

Palm SouthAmerica, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.) 

Palm Computing Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) 

Palm Chile Limitada (Chile) 

Palm Colombia Limitada (Colombia) 

Palm Benelux B.V. (Netherlands) 

Palm Australasia Pty Ltd. (Australia)

Palm Canada Inc. (Ontario, Canada) 

Palm Singapore Pte. Ltd.(Singapore) 

Palm Geneva SARL (Switzerland) 

HandspringInternational Ltd. (BVI) 

Handspring Facility Company LLC (Delaware, U.S.) 

Handspring Corporation (Delaware, U.S.)
#### § 2530.200a Scope.
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.8 How are certifying entities designated and used for purposes of this subchapter? ( a ) Applicants and licensees may nominate a certifying entity (CE) for the performance of tasks for which the Coast Guard is responsible under this subchapter.
( b ) Nominations may be made at any time after the Maritime Administration issues a record of decision approving the application, and must include the following information for each nominee: ( 1 ) The specific functions or tasks to be performed by the nominee;
( 2 ) Name and address;
( 3 ) Size and type of organization or corporation;
( 4 ) Previous experience as a CE, certified verification agent, or similar third-party representative;
( 5 ) Experience in design, fabrication, or installation of fixed offshore oil and gas platforms, similar fixed, floating, or gravity-based structures and project-related structures, systems, and equipment;
( 6 ) Technical capabilities, including professional certifications and organizational memberships of the nominee or the primary staff to be associated with the CE's duties for the specific project;
( 7 ) In-house availability of, or access to, appropriate technology such as computer modeling programs and hardware or testing materials and equipment;
( 8 ) Ability to perform and effectively manage the duties for which it is nominated considering current resource availability;
( 9 ) Previous experience with regulatory requirements and procedures;
( 10 ) A statement signed by the nominee's chief officer or that person's designee that the nominee: ( i ) Is not owned or controlled by the designer, manufacturer, or supplier of any equipment, material, system, or subsystem that would be the subject of the nominee's duties, or by any manufacturer of similar equipment or material; and that
( ii ) The nominee will allow access to an official representative of the Coast Guard, upon request, to facilities or records that relate to its duties; and
( 11 ) A list of documents and certifications to be furnished to the Coast Guard by the nominee.
( c ) The Commandant (CG-5P) may accept or reject the nomination of a CE and will provide guidance and oversight to each CE. The Commandant (CG-5P) may terminate the acceptance of a CE at any time.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39175, July 1, 2013]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KIMBERLY CLARK CORPORATION,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (BROMLEY),

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 521 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED and the Request for Supersedeas Pending Petition for Allocatur is 

DISMISSED as moot.
§ 401.90 Boarding for inspections. ( a ) For the purpose of enforcing these Regulations in this part in both Canadian and U.S. waters, an officer may board any vessel and: ( 1 ) Examine the vessel, its equipment and cargo; and
( 2 ) Determine that the vessel is adequately manned.
( b ) In addition to § 401.90(a)(1) and (2) in Canadian waters, a Manager's officer may also: ( 1 ) Require any person appearing to be in charge of the vessel to produce for inspection, or for the purpose of making copies or extracts, any log book, document or paper; and
( 2 ) In carrying out an inspection: ( i ) Use or cause to be used any computer system or data processing system on the vessel to examine any data contained in, or available to, the system;
( ii ) Reproduce any record, or cause it to be reproduced from the data, in the form of a print-out or other intelligible output and remove the print-out or other output for examination or copying; and
( iii ) Use or cause to be used any copying equipment in the vessel to make copies of any books, records, electronic data or other documents.
( c ) In Canadian waters, the owner or person who is in possession or control of a vessel that is inspected, and every person who is found on the vessel, shall: ( 1 ) Give the officer all reasonable assistance to enable the officer to carry out the inspection and exercise any power conferred by the Canada Marine Act; and
( 2 ) Provide the officer with any information relevant to the administration of these practices and procedures that the officer may reasonably require.
( d ) Vessels shall provide a safe and approved means of boarding. Pigeon holes are not accepted as a means of boarding and an alternate safe means of access shall be provided.
[65 FR 52915, Aug. 31, 2000; 65 FR 56486, Sept. 19, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 10690, Mar. 9, 2010; 88 FR 14268, Mar. 8, 2023]
#### Ferguson *v.*Loudermilk *et al.*

Submitted July 18,

-Decided December 12, 1906.

Certiorari. Before Judge Kimsey. Habersham superior court. September term, 1905.

*J. B. Jones, McMillan & Erwin,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. G. Edwards,*contra.

Beok, J.

1. On the hearing of a petition for certiorari the power of the superior court extends only to the correction of errors committed on the trial below; and an assignment of error to the effect that one of the jurors in the justice’s court was related within the prohibited degrees to the opposite party, and also that said opposite party or his agent furnished whisky to the jury, where no objection was made thereto at the trial, and no ruling by the magistrate was made thereon, can not be taken advantage of by certiorari; nor can an assignment of error, based upon improper remarks made by counsel, be considered in a petition for certiorari, when it does not distinctly appear that the remarks were heard by the court, or that a ruling of the court was invoked in reference to the said remarks at the time of the trial. *Mitchell*v. *Bradberry,*76 *Ga.*15; *O’Dell*v. *State,*120 *Ga.*152; *Bryant*v. *Ridgway,*126 *Ga.*733.

2. The evidence in this, case, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the jury in the justice’s court to find that defendant’s dog, not being at the time on the premises of the defendant or person having charge thereof, did kill and injure plaintiffs’ sheep as alleged, and no errors of law having been committed, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the petition for certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concwr.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"ADR Offers Don’t Show Weakness","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Pt2F0IJXge\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/22-weakness\/\">ADR Offers Don’t Show Weakness<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/22-weakness\/embed\/#?secret=Pt2F0IJXge\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ADR Offers Don’t Show Weakness” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"Pt2F0IJXge\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Policy Statement

															Home/Policy Statement Policy StatementADR2022-02-16T13:12:32-05:00
			
			Policy StatementDeclaration of Policy on use of Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution
Pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 and the Presidential Memorandum of May 1, 1998, implementing that act, the ______________ Department/Agency recognizes that in appropriate circumstances, there may be more effective methods to resolve issues in controversy that arise involving the Department/agency than through reliance upon more adversarial administrative processes. The voluntary use of alternative means of dispute resolution, such as mediation, fact-finding, ombuds, neutral evaluation, and arbitration, often can provide faster, less expensive, and more effective resolution of disputes that arise with employees, contractors, the regulated community and others with whom the Department/agency does business. In recognition of this, the _____________ Department/Agency declares that: (1) its managers and attorneys will be knowledgeable about alternative means of dispute resolution, (2) its managers and attorneys will examine the suitability of using alternative means of dispute resolution when issues in controversy arise involving the Department/agency, and (3) in appropriate disputes, its managers and attorneys will use alternative means of dispute resolution in a good faith effort to achieve consensual resolutions of issues in controversy involving the Department/ Agency Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
§ 151.35 Certificates needed to carry Category D NLS and Category D Oil-like NLS. ( a ) A U.S. oceangoing ship may not carry a Category D NLS listed in § 151.47 in a cargo tank unless the ship has a Certificate of Inspection endorsed to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank, and if the ship engages if a foreign voyage— ( 1 ) An NLS Certificate issued under § 151.37(b) to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank; or
( 2 ) A Certificate of Fitness issued under 46 CFR part 153 to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank.
( b ) A U.S. oceangoing ship may not carry a Category D oil-like NLS listed in § 151.49 in a cargo tank unless the ship has a Certificate of Inspection endorsed to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank, and if the ship engages if a foreign voyage— ( 1 ) An Attachment for NLSs to the IOPP Certificate, issued under § 151.37(a), to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank; or
( 2 ) An NLS Certificate issued under § 151.37(b) to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank, or
( 3 ) A Certificate of Fitness issued under 46 CFR part 153 to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank.
( c ) A foreign oceangoing ship in the navigable waters of the U.S. may not carry a Category D NLS listed in § 151.47 in a cargo tank unless the ship has one of the following: ( 1 ) An NLS Certificate endorsed to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank; or
( 2 ) A Certificate of Compliance issued under 46 CFR part 153 to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank.
( d ) A foreign oceangoing ship in the navigable waters of the U.S. may not carry a Category D oil-like NLS listed in § 151.49 in a cargo tank unless the ship has one of the following: ( 1 ) An Attachment for NLSs to the IOPP Certificate to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank; or
( 2 ) An NLS Certificate endorsed to allow the NLS to be carried in the cargo tank; or
( 3 ) A Certificate of Compliance issued under 46 CFR part 153 to allow the NLS to be carried in the cargo tank.
( e ) A U.S. oceangoing ship authorized to carry certain dangerous cargoes in bulk under 46 CFR part 98 may not carry a Category D NLS listed in § 151.47 or a Category D oil-like NLS listed in § 151.49 in a cargo tank unless the ship has a Certificate of Inspection endorsed to allow the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank, and if the ship engages in a foreign voyage, an NLS Certificate issued under § 151.37(b) that allows the NLS to be carried in that cargo tank.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 96 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 81
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 96

    Expressing the sense of the Senate that Harriett Woods will be 
              remembered as a pioneer in women's politics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2007

 Mrs. McCaskill (for herself, Mr. Bond, Mrs. Clinton, Mrs. Boxer, Ms. 
Stabenow, Ms. Cantwell, Ms. Mikulski, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Murray, Mrs. 
 Lincoln, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Levin, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Obama, 
and Mr. Harkin) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             March 15, 2007

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of the Senate that Harriett Woods will be 
              remembered as a pioneer in women's politics.

Whereas Harriett Woods, a native of Cleveland, Ohio, launched a 50-year 
        political career with a neighborhood crusade against rattling potholes;
Whereas Harriett Woods, who died of leukemia at the age of 79 on February 8, 
        2007, had many firsts, including being the first female editor for her 
        college newspaper at the University of Michigan, the first woman on the 
        Missouri Transportation Commission, and the first woman to win statewide 
        office in the State of Missouri as Lieutenant Governor;
Whereas, from 1991 to 1995, Harriett Woods served as president of the National 
        Women's Political Caucus, a bipartisan grassroots organization whose 
        mission is to increase women's participation in the political process at 
        all levels of government; and
Whereas Harriett Woods was integral to the electoral successes of what became 
        known as the Year of the Woman, when in 1992, female candidates won 19 
        seats in the House of Representatives and 3 seats in the Senate: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that Harriett Woods 
will be remembered as a pioneer in women's politics, whose actions and 
leadership inspired hundreds of women nationwide to participate in the 
political process and to break gender barriers at every level of 
government.

                                                        Calendar No. 81

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               S. RES. 96

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Expressing the sense of the Senate that Harriett Woods will be 
              remembered as a pioneer in women's politics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 15, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### § 25.607 Time limitation on claims.

A claim may be settled only if presented in writing within two years after it accrues.
EXHIBIT
31.2                                           Certifications
 
 I,
Christopher Ryan,  certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. ;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant  as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s  other certifying officer and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
 
 a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s  disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the  registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s  most recent
fiscal quarter  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant’s  internal control over
financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant’s  other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee
of registrant’s  board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which  are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s  ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.
 
 Date: May
20, 2009
 
 /s/ Christopher
Ryan
 Christopher
Ryan
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4786

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20, 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 110 Postal Way in Carrollton, Georgia, as

the ‘‘Samuel P. Roberts Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4786 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 110 Postal Way in Carrollton, Georgia, shall be

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Samuel P. Roberts Post

5 Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Samuel P. Roberts Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
#### § 335.3 Applicability.

This regulation (33 CFR parts 335 through 338) is applicable to the Corps of Engineers when undertaking operation and maintenance activities at Army Civil Works projects.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Ch.03 – ADR is Effective","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yxqQRvPrRE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch03\/\">Ch.03 – ADR is Effective<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch03\/embed\/#?secret=yxqQRvPrRE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ch.03 – ADR is Effective” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"yxqQRvPrRE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}