alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 332.6 Monitoring. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Monitoring the compensatory mitigation project site is necessary to determine if the project is meeting its performance standards, and to determine if measures are necessary to ensure that the compensatory mitigation project is accomplishing its objectives. The submission of monitoring reports to assess the development and condition of the compensatory mitigation project is required, but the content and level of detail for those monitoring reports must be commensurate with the scale and scope of the compensatory mitigation project, as well as the compensatory mitigation project type. The mitigation plan must address the monitoring requirements for the compensatory mitigation project, including the parameters to be monitored, the length of the monitoring period, the party responsible for conducting the monitoring, the frequency for submitting monitoring reports to the district engineer, and the party responsible for submitting those monitoring reports to the district engineer.
( 2 ) The district engineer may conduct site inspections on a regular basis (e.g., annually) during the monitoring period to evaluate mitigation site performance.
( b ) *Monitoring period.* The mitigation plan must provide for a monitoring period that is sufficient to demonstrate that the compensatory mitigation project has met performance standards, but not less than five years. A longer monitoring period must be required for aquatic resources with slow development rates (e.g., forested wetlands, bogs). Following project implementation, the district engineer may reduce or waive the remaining monitoring requirements upon a determination that the compensatory mitigation project has achieved its performance standards. Conversely the district engineer may extend the original monitoring period upon a determination that performance standards have not been met or the compensatory mitigation project is not on track to meet them. The district engineer may also revise monitoring requirements when remediation and/or adaptive management is required.
( c ) *Monitoring reports.* ( 1 ) The district engineer must determine the information to be included in monitoring reports. This information must be sufficient for the district engineer to determine how the compensatory mitigation project is progressing towards meeting its performance standards, and may include plans (such as as-built plans), maps, and photographs to illustrate site conditions. Monitoring reports may also include the results of functional, condition, or other assessments used to provide quantitative or qualitative measures of the functions provided by the compensatory mitigation project site.
( 2 ) The permittee or sponsor is responsible for submitting monitoring reports in accordance with the special conditions of the DA permit or the terms of the instrument. Failure to submit monitoring reports in a timely manner may result in compliance action by the district engineer.
( 3 ) Monitoring reports must be provided by the district engineer to interested federal, tribal, state, and local resource agencies, and the public, upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1337 Regulated Navigation Area, Zidell Waterfront Property, Willamette River, OR. ( a ) *Regulated navigation area.* The following area is a regulated navigation area: All waters within the area bounded by the following points: 45°29′55.12′′ N/122°40′2.19′′ W; thence continuing to 45°29′55.14′′ N/122°39′59.36′′ W; thence continuing to 45°29′56.30′′ N/122°39 59.09′′ W; thence continuing to 45°29′57.51′′ N/122°39′59.64′′ W; thence continuing to 45°29′58.72′′ N/122°39′59.64′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′0.52′′ N/122°39′59.94′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′1.95′′ N/122°40′0.46′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′3.44′′ N/122°40′0.78′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30' 4.87′′ N/122°40' 0.95′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′7.33′′ N/122°40′1.80′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′8.11′′ N/122°40′2.69′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′8.83′′ N/122°40′3.81′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′13.06′′ N/122°40′5.39′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′15.30′′ N/122°40′6.93′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′17.78′′ N/122°40′8.16′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′20.53′′ N/122°40′9.07′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′20.90′′ N/122°40′11.52′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′24.04′′ N/122°40′12.53′′ W; thence continuing to 45°30′23.79′′ N/122°40′14.87′′ W; thence continuing along the shoreline to 45°29′55.12′′ N/122°40′2.19′′ W. Geographically the regulated navigation area covers all waters adjacent to the Zidell Waterfront Property on the Willamette River extending from the west bank of the river out 200 to 400 feet into the river depending on the exact location between approximate river mile 14.2 near the Ross Island Bridge and approximate river mile 13.5 near the Marquam Bridge.
( b ) *Regulations.* All vessels are prohibited from anchoring, dragging, dredging, or trawling in the regulated navigation area established by this section. See 33 CFR part 165, subpart B, for additional information and requirements.
[USCG-2011-0254, 77 FR 19546, Apr. 2, 2012]
EXHIBIT 32.2

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

RELM Wireless Corporation

| |                             
| | ----------------------------
| | /s/ WILLIAM P. KELLY        
| | William P. Kelly            
| | Executive Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer     

November 10, 2009
#### § 334.1420 Pacific Ocean off Orote Point, Apra Harbor, Island of Guam, Marianas Islands; small arms firing range.

(a) *The danger zone.* The waters within an area delineated by a line joining the following positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 13°26′03.9′′ | 144°37′38.3′′ |
| 13°25′26.0′′ | 144°36′14.2′′ |
| 13°24′51.2′′ | 144°36′31.9′′ |
| 13°25′28.7′′ | 144°37′59.1′′ |
| 13°25′43.2′′ | 144°38′09.5′′ |

(b) *The regulations.*

(1) The danger zone shall be closed to the public and shipping on specific dates to be designated for actual firing and no person, vessel or other craft shall enter or remain in the danger zone designated for firing except as may be authorized by the enforcing agency. Notification to maritime interests of specific dates of firing will be disseminated by the enforcing agency. On dates not specified for firing, the danger zone shall be open to normal maritime traffic.

(2) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, U.S. Naval Station, Guam, Marianas Islands and such agencies as he may designate.

[28 FR 5377, May 30, 1963. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17559, Apr. 10, 1997]
§ 334.1350 Pacific Ocean, Island of Oahu, Hawaii; danger zone. ( a ) *The danger zone.* Beginning at point of origin at Kaena Point Light in latitude 21°34′42′′ N., longitude 158°16′54′′ W.; thence on a bearing of 282°30′ True to latitude 21°38′ N., longitude 158°33′ W.; thence along the arc of a circle centered at Kaena Point Light to latitude 21°42′30′′ N., longitude 158°03′ W.; thence on a bearing of 228° true to latitude 21°35′33′′ N., longitude 158°11′30′′ W.; thence to point of origin.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) The area will be closed to the public and all shipping on specific dates to be designated for actual firing and no person, vessel or other craft shall enter or remain in the area during the times designated for firing except as may be authorized by the enforcing agency. Notification to maritime interests of specific dates of firing will be disseminated through the U.S. Coast Guard media of the Local Notice to Mariners and the NOTAMS published by the Corps of Engineers. On dates not specified for firing, the area will be open to normal maritime traffic.
( 2 ) The regulations of this section shall be enforced by the Commanding General, U.S. Army, Hawaii/25th Infantry Division, APO 957, and such agencies as he may designate.
[24 FR 5999, July 28, 1959. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17559, Apr. 10, 1997]
1,"t","Cherry Production: Released June 21, 2007, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture."
1,"t","Tart Cherries:  Total Production by State and United States,"
1,"t","2005-06 and Forecasted 2007"
1,"h","","","",""
1,"h","","Total Production","Total Production","Total Production"
1,"h","State","","",""
1,"h","","2005","2006","2007"
1,"h","","","",""
1,"u","","Million Pounds","Million Pounds","Million Pounds"
1,"d","MI",208.0,190.0,230.0
1,"d","NY",7.5,10.4,13.0
1,"d","OR",0.3,3.4,0.8
1,"d","PA",2.6,5.2,4.3
1,"d","UT",28.0,28.0,16.0
1,"d","WA",16.5,22.3,18.0
1,"d","WI",7.5,4.5,11.7
1,"d","",,,
1,"d","US",270.4,263.8,293.8
1,"c",""
#### THE MAYOR, Etc., OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK Respondent, *v.*HENRY W. GENET, Appellant.

Referenee— *long account—laches.*

Appeal from an order of the Special Term, denying a motion made by the defendant for a reference.

The gravamen of the complaint in this action is, that the defendant has drawn and received from the comptroller of the city of New York a very much larger sum of money than “was due for services, labor and materials necessary for, and which had been rendered and furnished in and about the construction ” and erection of a court-house. The answer denies this allegation. The court *held,*that though the action was not upon an account, yet the trial of the issue would, doubtless, involve “ the examination of a long account,” which made the cause a referable one.

The case was upon the calendar of the Circuit Court, for trial, in December, 1874. Instead of moving that court, upon the calendar of which it was placed for trial, the defendant moved in another branch of the same court, before another judge, to take it from the *659trial court and send it to a reference, and this motion was delayed until the cause was on the day calendar for trial.

The court was of opinion that it would encourage delay if the discretion of the court should be exercised in favor of the defendant, and that for that reason the reference was properly denied.

*Oliver W. West,*for the appellant.

*John E. Parsons,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Westbrook, J.

Daniels and Brady, JJ. concurred.

Order affirmed with ten dollars costs, besides disbursements, but without prejudice to the right of ttie trial court to make such a disposition of the action as it may see fit to do.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document





































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.14    
    


 
    AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DISTRIBUTION SUPPORT
  AGREEMENT    
    



        This Amendment is made and entered into as of April 11, 2012 (this "Amendment")
and amends the Second Amended and Restated Distribution Support Agreement dated as of November 8, 2011 (the "Agreement") between NorthStar Realty
Finance Corp. ("NRFC") and NorthStar Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. (the "Company"). Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 


        WHEREAS,
each of NRFC and the Company desires to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement. 



        NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, each of NRFC and the Company
agrees as follows: 



        1.     Section 4
of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 



        "4.
Term.    This Agreement shall be in effect until the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the commencement of the
Offering or (b) the date upon which neither NS Advisor nor another Affiliate of NRFC is serving as the Company's Advisor (as such term is defined in the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as
amended from time to time) with responsibility for the Company's day-to-day operations (the "Term")." 




        2.     Except
to the extent amended hereby, the provisions of the Agreement shall remain unmodified, and the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, shall remain in full force
and effect in accordance with its terms. 



        3.     This
Amendment may be executed simultaneously in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument. 



[Signatures appear on following page]







 

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Distribution Support Agreement as
of the date and year first above written. 

 






							
	 	 	NorthStar Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.
	

 	
 	
By:	
 	
/s/ DANIEL R. GILBERT







 
	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	Daniel R. Gilbert
	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	 President and Chief Investment Officer
	

 	
 	
 NorthStar Realty Finance Corp.
	

 	
 	
By:	
 	
/s/ DANIEL R. GILBERT







 
	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	Daniel R. Gilbert
	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	 Co-President and Chief Investment Officer




 

 2











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.14


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DISTRIBUTION SUPPORT AGREEMENT
VIP.Docs-000033

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 62-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023 Page 1 of 3
VIP.Docs-000034

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 62-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023 Page 2 of 3
VIP.Docs-000036

Case 0:22-cv-61553-WPD Document 62-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2023 Page 3 of 3
#### Boner *vs*Montgomery.

Error to tiie Garrard Circuit.

*Chancery jurisdiction. Gaining.*

Chancery. *Case*40.

*January*11.

The loser of money at unlawful gaming may recover it back by bill in chancery. *(McKinney*vs *Pope’s adm’r,*3 *B. Monroe,*93; *Lyle*vs *Lindsey,. 511.,*J23.)

*Burdett*for plaintiff: *Dunlap*for defendant.

.Thdge Breok

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The right of the loser to resort to a Court of equity to recover.back money lost and paid at gaming, was settled by this Court, in *McKinney*vs *Pope’s adm’r.,*(3 *B. Monroe,*93;) and the same principle recognized in *Lyle*vs *Lindsey,*(5 *B. Monroe,*123.)

Regarding these cases as settling authoritatively the question of jurisdiction, it results that the Court below erred in dismissing, upon that ground, the complainant’s bill.

- Upon the merits, in view of the pleadings and the proof, the complainant, in our opinion, was entitled to recover sixty-six dollars, and with interest from the commencement of his suit.

It also seems to us that the grounds for the attachment awarded him, are satisfactorily sustained by the evidence, and that the relief sought in that respect should have been decreed.

' In regard to the cross bill of the defendant, we are of opinion it was properly dismissed.

The testimony is deemed insufficient to sustain the demand set up by the defendant, in opposition to the positive denials in the complainant’s answer.

■ Wherefore, the decree, in as far as it dismisses the cross bill of the defendant, is upon cross errors affirmed. But so far as it dismisses the complainant’s bill, it is reversed, and the cause remanded, that a decree may be rendered in conformity with this opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP00-56-001]

Take notice that on June 1, 2000, Northwest Pipeline Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing a compliance report.

Northwest states that the compliance report shows that during the 1999-2000 winter heating season, Northwest did not cut any primary gas during the timely scheduling process and that there were no adverse impacts associated with the letter Agreement dated August 24, 1999 between Northwest and Pan Alberta Gas (U.S.) Inc. with respect to the use of firm transportation through primary corridor rights.

Northwest states that a copy of this compliance report has been served upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on or before June 12, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14562  Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 187.308 Creation and cancellation of certificate of title. ( a ) Unless an application for a certificate of title is rejected under paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, the office must create a certificate for the vessel in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section not later than 20 days after delivery to it of an application that complies with § 187.307.
( b ) If the office creates electronic certificates of title, it must create an electronic certificate unless in the application the secured party of record or, if none, the owner of record, requests that the office create a written certificate.
( c ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the office may reject an application for a certificate of title only if— ( 1 ) The application does not comply with § 187.307;
( 2 ) The application does not contain documentation sufficient for the office to determine whether the applicant is entitled to a certificate;
( 3 ) There is a reasonable basis for concluding that the application is fraudulent or issuance of a certificate would facilitate a fraudulent or illegal act; or
( 4 ) The application does not comply with State law.
( d ) The office must reject an application for a certificate of title for a vessel that is a documented vessel or a foreign-documented vessel.
( e ) The office may cancel a certificate of title created by it only if the office— ( 1 ) Could have rejected the application for the certificate under paragraph (c) of this section;
( 2 ) Is required to cancel the certificate under another provision of this subpart; or
( 3 ) Receives satisfactory evidence that the vessel is a documented vessel or a foreign-documented vessel.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14244]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, 
Washington, DC 20549.
    Extension: Form ADV-E; SEC File No. 270-318; OMB Control No. 3235-
0361.
    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget a 
request for extension of the previously approved collection of 
information on the following form:
    Form ADV-E is the cover sheet for accountant examination 
certificates filed pursuant to rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment 
Advisers Act by investment advisers retaining custody of client 
securities or funds. The annual burden is approximately three minutes 
per respondent.
    The estimate of burden hours set forth above is made solely for the 
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act and is not derived from a 
comprehensive or even representative survey or study of the cost of SEC 
rules and forms.
    Any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    General comments regarding the estimated burden hours should be 
directed to the Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission 
at the address below. Any comments concerning the accuracy of the 
estimated average burden hours for compliance with Commission rules and 
forms should be directed to Michael E. Bartell, Associate Director, 
Office of Information Technology, Securities and Exchange Commission, 
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549, and Desk Office for the 
Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. Comments must be submitted to 
OMB within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: May 25, 2000.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14244 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### § 133.15 Determination of eligibility for funding.

Upon receipt of the information under § 133.11 and, if necessary, from other sources determined to be appropriate at his or her discretion, the OSC will determine whether the proposed removal actions meet the requirements of § 133.13. If necessary, the OSC may seek further clarification of the proposed actions from the State official. The OSC shall expeditiously notify the State official and the Director, NPFC, of his or her decision.