alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Animal & Natural Resources 
-  Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search  UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION FOR LAND-ATMOSPHERE STUDIES OF CLASIC
**Location: Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory**
												Project Number: 1265-12130-002-09Project Type:																				Reimbursable

Start Date: Feb 01, 2007End Date: Sep 30, 2008

**Objective:**Understanding the interaction of the land surface and the atmosphere, in particular cloud formation, is an unresolved problem that limits the accuracy of weather and climate forecasts relevant to agriculture. The land component of the Cloud Land Atmospheric Interaction Campaign (CLASIC) the relationship of clouds and two important land variables, soil moisture and evaporative flux, will be examined. These efforts will determine the level up-scaling/aggregation required in order to understand the impact of landscape changes affecting energy balance/flux partitioning and impact on cloud/atmospheric dynamics.  The critical factors that need to me monitored in order to predict the onset of cloud formation will be identified.
**Approach:**A one month field campaign will be conducted in the Southern Great Plains region of Oklahoma. Tower observations of surface fluxes including sensible, latent, and CO2 fluxes at four locations with replication (if possible) to obtain a near-continuous monitoring of fluxes for key landuse types from Late Spring to early Fall. Replicate towers will help quantify flux variance within each landuse as well as provide useful statistics for examining differences in fluxes across landuse. Intensive soil moisture for specific regions within the domain using in-situ networks and new aircraft sensors. Intensive soil temperature and measures of ground heat flux using newly designed soil heat flux probes. Regional passive microwave mapping of soil moisture will be conducted using a high altitude aircraft, which will be complemented by satellite studies. Analyses will be conducted cooperatively with other CLASIC scientists focusing on atmospheric and cloud observations.
    Project TeamJACKSON, THOMAS KUSTAS, WILLIAM  - *BILL* 
Project Annual Reports FY 2010 FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 
Related National Programs Global Change(204) Water Availability and Water Management(211)  							Last Modified: 01/10/2012 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4956

To increase the amount of student loans that may be forgiven for service

as a teacher in a school with a high concentration of low-income students.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 25, 2000

Mr. PAYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To increase the amount of student loans that may be forgiven for service as a teacher in a school with a high

concentration of low-income students.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teacher Loan Forgive5 ness Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF STUDENT LOANS ELIGI7 BLE FOR FORGIVENESS FOR SERVICE AS A

8 TEACHER.

9 (a) GUARANTEED LOANS.—Section 428J(c)(1) of the

10 Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1078–10(c)(1))
2

•HR 4956 IH

1 is amended by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘$12,800’’.

3 (b) DIRECT LOANS.—Section 460(c)(1) of the Higher

4 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087j(c)(1)) is amend5 ed by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$12,800’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32(c)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and        |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Georgia Power Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Georgia Power Company. |

 

 

 

|   | /s/Michael D. Garrett

Michael D. Garrett

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/Cliff S. Thrasher

Cliff S. Thrasher

Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

  |

 

Date:  August 3, 2006
§ 334.250 Gunston Cove, at Whitestone Point, Va.; U.S. Army restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The waters within an area beginning at a point on the shoreline at longitude 77°08′36′′; thence to latitude 38°40′22′′, longitude 77°08′39′′; thence to latitude 38°40′14′′, longitude 77°08′22′′; thence to a point on the shoreline at longitude 77°08′18′′ and thence along the shoreline to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* No person, vessel, or other craft shall enter or remain in the area at any time except as authorized by the enforcing agency.
( c ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, Philadelphia, Pa., and such agencies as he may designate.
[31 FR 16560, Dec. 28, 1966. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert W. O'Brien, Principal Accounting Officer of Aberdeen Idaho Mining Company (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:  July 29, 2003

/s/Robert W. O'Brien

Robert W. O'Brien

Principal Accounting Officer
**                                        Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

This discussion forum is now closed for comments. Thank you for your participation!

As part of EPA’s comprehensive approach to enhance the Agency’s current chemicals management program,

EPA plans to use a two-step process to identify priority chemical substances for review and assessment under

the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). EPA invites you to share your thoughts on the prioritization

factors and data sources the Agency intends to use in this process. EPA will not respond directly to any

comments received in this forum, but will look to this public input to help inform its process to identify

candidate chemicals for near-term evaluation.

This online discussion forum remained open and available for comment from August 18, 2011 until 5:00

p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on September 21, 2011. After the discussion forum has closed, EPA will

place the entire discussion forum, with comments included and attached to their associated post, in docket

EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0516, which will be available at http://www.regulations.gov.

In addition to providing this discussion forum, EPA hosted a webinar on this topic from 1:30 to 3:30 p.m.

Eastern Daylight Time on September 7, 2011. Information on the webinar is available here.

Please review the Comment Policy and Frequent Questions pages and then consider the three topics

presented below.

Before providing your thoughts on the specific discussion topics presented in this forum, EPA asks that you

read the complete Discussion Guide, which describes the two-step process EPA plans to use and presents the

discussion questions on prioritization factors and data sources. If you wish, you can download the Discussion

Guide in PDF format. The topics presented in this forum link to the appropriate related information in the

Discussion Guide.

Discussion Forum: Identifying Priority Chemicals for Review and Assessment http://blog.epa.gov/chemprioritization/

1 of 2 9/29/2011 9:36 AM
EPA invites your thoughts on the prioritization factors the Agency is planning to use.

EPA invites your thoughts on the data sources that the Agency intends to use to identify chemicals that meet

one or more of the Step 1(a) prioritization factors.

EPA invites your thoughts on the exposure data sources and hazard data sources the Agency is planning to

use for further analysis.

Discussion Forum Home | About This Forum

EPA Home | Contact us

Comment policy

Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be posted as early as possible the next business day.

Frequent questions

Discussion Guide

Related links

EPA Discussion Guide for Identifying Priority Chemicals

EPA Enhancing Chemicals Management

EPA Existing Chemicals Program

EPA Identifying Priority Chemicals for Review and Assessment

Slides from the September 7, 2011 Webinar

Log in

Entries RSS

Comments RSS

WordPress.org

Discussion Forum: Identifying Priority Chemicals for Review and Assessment http://blog.epa.gov/chemprioritization/

2 of 2 9/29/2011 9:36 AM
Exhibit 31.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Frederic Richardson certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Innofone.com Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
          of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: October 10, 2003



/s/ Frederic Richardson
---------------------------
Frederic Richardson,
President, CEO & CFO
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14266]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Upper Deckers Creek Watershed, Preston and Monongalia Counties, 
West Virginia

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, Agriculture.

ACTION:  Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council of Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR Part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Regulations (7 CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice than an 
environmental impact statement is not being prepared for the Upper 
Deckers Creek Watershed Project, Preston and Monongalia Counties, West 
Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William J. Hartman, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 75 High 
Street, Room 301, Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505, telephone 304-284-
7545.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, William J. Hartman, State Conservationist, 
has determined that the preparation and review of an environmental 
impact statement are not needed for this project.
    The project purpose is water quality improvement through acid mine 
drainage remediation. Planned actions include mine spoil regrading, 
highwall elimination, revegetation, limestone channels, passive 
treatment systems, grouting, and addition of limestone fines to 
streams.
    The Finding Of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been forwarded to 
the Environmental Protection Agency and to various Federal, State, and 
local agencies and interested parties. A limited number of copies of 
the FONSI are available to fill single copy requests at the above 
address. Basic data developed during the environmental assessment are 
on file and may be reviewed by contacting William J. Hartman.
    No administrative action on implementation of the proposal will be 
taken until 30 days after the date of this publication in the Federal 
Register.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under NO. 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood 
Prevention, and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and 
local officials.)
William J. Hartman,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 00-14266 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
§ 183.586 Pressure impulse test. A fuel tank is tested by performing the following procedures in the following order: ( a ) Perform the static pressure test under § 183.580.
( b ) If the tank is non-metallic, fill it to capacity with a gasoline that has at least a 50 percent aromatic content. Keep the fuel in the tank at 21 °C or higher for 30 days prior to testing.
( c ) Mount the tank on a test platform.
( d ) Fill the tank to capacity with water.
( e ) Cap and seal each opening in the tank.
( f ) Apply 25,000 cycles of pressure impulse at the rate of no more than 15 impulses per minute varying from zero to three PSIG to zero inside the tank top from a regulated source of air, inert gas, or water.
( g ) Perform the static pressure test under § 183.580.
§ 401.16 Propeller direction alarms. Every vessel of 1600 gross registered tons or integrated tug and barge or articulated tug and barge unit of combined 1600 gross registered tons or more shall be equipped with— ( a ) Propeller direction and shaft r.p.m. indicators located in the wheelhouse and the engine room; and
( b ) Visible and audible wrong-way propeller direction alarms, with a time delay of not greater than 8 seconds, located in the wheelhouse and the engineer room, unless the vessel is fitted with a device which renders it impossible to operate engines against orders from the bridge telegraph.
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended and secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471)
[41 FR 12227, Mar. 24, 1976, as amended at 45 FR 52378, Aug. 7, 1980; 70 FR 12971, Mar. 17, 2005; 71 FR 5606, Feb. 2, 2006]
#### § 25.125 Appeal.

The final denial of a claim by a settlement authority or a partial approval by a settlement authority is not subject to appeal except under the procedures prescribed for Military Claims in Subpart D of this part.
§ 183.568 Anti-siphon protection. Each fuel line from the fuel tank to the fuel inlet connection on the carburetor must: ( a ) Be above the level of the tank top; or
( b ) Have an anti-siphon device or an electrically operated fuel stop valve: ( 1 ) At the tank withdrawal fitting; or
( 2 ) Installed so the line from the fuel tank is above the top of the tank; or
( c ) Provided that the fuel tank top is below the level of the carburetor inlet, be metallic fuel lines meeting the construction requirements of § 183.538 or “USCG Type A1” hose, with one or two manual shutoff valves installed as follows: ( 1 ) Directly at the fuel tank connection arranged to be readily accessible for operation from outside of the compartment, and
( 2 ) If the length of fuel line from the tank outlet to the engine inlet is greater than 12 feet, a manual shutoff valve shall be installed at the fuel inlet connection to the engine.
[CGD 74-209, 42 FR 5950, Jan. 31, 1977, as amended by CGD 81-092, 48 FR 55737, Dec. 15, 1983; CGD 85-098, 52 FR 19729, May 27, 1987]
EXHIBIT G 

 

Case 0:22-cv-61795-XXXX Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2022 Page 1 of 4
5 Pages SCANNED Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:34:10 GMT

Case 0:22-cv-61795-XXXX Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2022 Page 2 of 4
5 Pages SCANNED Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:34:10 GMT

Case 0:22-cv-61795-XXXX Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2022 Page 3 of 4
5 Pages SCANNED Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:34:10 GMT

Case 0:22-cv-61795-XXXX Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/22/2022 Page 4 of 4
§ 329.6 Interstate or foreign commerce. ( a ) *Nature of commerce: type, means, and extent of use.* The types of commercial use of a waterway are extremely varied and will depend on the character of the region, its products, and the difficulties or dangers of navigation. It is the waterbody's capability of use by the public for purposes of transportation of commerce which is the determinative factor, and not the time, extent or manner of that use. As discussed in § 329.9 of this part, it is sufficient to establish the potential for commercial use at any past, present, or future time. Thus, sufficient commerce may be shown by historical use of canoes, bateaux, or other frontier craft, as long as that type of boat was common or well-suited to the place and period. Similarly, the particular items of commerce may vary widely, depending again on the region and period. The goods involved might be grain, furs, or other commerce of the time. Logs are a common example; transportation of logs has been a substantial and well-recognized commercial use of many navigable waters of the United States. Note, however, that the mere presence of floating logs will not of itself make the river “navigable”; the logs must have been related to a commercial venture. Similarly, the presence of recreational craft may indicate that a waterbody is capable of bearing some forms of commerce, either presently, in the future, or at a past point in time.
( b ) *Nature of commerce: interstate and intrastate.* Interstate commerce may of course be existent on an intrastate voyage which occurs only between places within the same state. It is only necessary that goods may be brought from, or eventually be destined to go to, another state. (For purposes of this regulation, the term “interstate commerce” hereinafter includes “foreign commerce” as well.)