alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 331.8 Timeframes for final appeal decisions.

The Division Engineer will make a final decision on the merits of the appeal at the earliest practicable time, in accordance with the following time limits. The administrative appeal process is initiated by the receipt of an RFA by the division engineer. The Corps will review the RFA to determine whether the RFA is acceptable. The Corps will notify the appellant accordingly within 30 days of the receipt of the RFA in accordance with § 331.7(b). If the Corps determines that the RFA is acceptable, the RO will immediately request the administrative record from the district engineer. The division engineer will normally make a final decision on the merits of the appeal within 90 days of the receipt of an acceptable RFA unless any site visit is delayed pursuant to § 331.7(c). In such case, the RO will complete the appeal review and the division engineer will make a final appeal decision within 30 days of the site visit. In no case will a site visit delay extend the total appeal process beyond twelve months from the date of receipt of an acceptable RFA.
Version 1.0



Volume 2 (Chapters S-LL) will be issued as separate chapters and available
online.

This report is presented in Portable Document Format.
Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0 or later is required to view it.
If you wish to download Acrobat Reader 4.0 free of charge, click here.Bulletin PDF file (801 KB)

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and NoticesU.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/bul/b2064-x/
Questions or Assistance: USGS Web Contact
Page Last Modified: Wed Nov 23 11:16 EDT 2016
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 623 

Recognizing the importance of the role of the Lander Trail in the settlement 

of the American West on the 150th anniversary of the Lander Trail. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 24 (legislative day, JULY 23), 2008 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. BARRASSO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of the role of the Lander Trail 

in the settlement of the American West on the 150th 

anniversary of the Lander Trail. 

Whereas Frederick W. Lander first surveyed and supervised 

construction of the Lander Trail in 1858 to provide emigrants with a travelable link between the Oregon and 

California Trails; 

Whereas 13,000 emigrants traveled on the Lander Trail during the settlement of the Western United States; 

Whereas the Lander Trail was the first Federal road west of 

the Mississippi River; 

Whereas travelers in the American West used the Lander 

Trail for 54 years until 1912; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 623 IS 

Whereas people can still experience the Lander Trail in the 

same setting that Frederick W. Lander first began construction in 1858: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors the important role 

2 of the Lander Trail in the settlement of the Western 

3 United States on the sesquicentennial anniversary of the 

4 Lander Trail. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Barry Tranckino, * From the 132 nd District Court

of Borden County,

Trial Court No. 1298.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 8

- 002 29

- CV * September 6, 2018

Sinclair Oil & Gas Company, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has considered Barry Tranckino’s motion to withdraw his notice

of appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in

accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred

by reason of this appeal are taxed against Barry Tranckino.
AAM-12-425-E June 12, 2012

Exemption No. 10558 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0607

Mr. Peter Swift

Chief Pilot Snohomish Flying Service, Inc. 9900 Airport Way, Harvey Field (S43) Snohomish, WA 98296

Dear Mr. Swift:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 30, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Snohomish Flying Service, Inc. (SFS) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow SFS to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to SFS.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of2

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Snohomish Flying Service, Inc. an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow SFS to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations

described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of SFS are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of the SFS part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/S/
James R Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
1 

Physical Wellness for Older Adults 

It is recommended that older adults achieve 150 minutes of moderate physical activity per week. 

This should include at least 2 days of strength training and exercises that improve balance. 

Programs that promote physical activity can help older adults create healthier habits. Some ideas 

to promote activity include:

● Incorporating one of these evidence-based physical activity programs into your senior 

nutrition program:

o Geri-Fit®

o Walk with Ease

o On the Move: Group Exercise for Improved Mobility in Older Adults®

o Stay Active and Independent for Life (SAIL) 

o Moving for Better Balance

o SilverSneakers®

o Tai Chi for Arthritis and Fall Prevention

● Starting a walking club. You can create maps of nearby walking routes. There are a variety of 

free apps online that are easy to use and help generate maps and include information like 

distance. Even a short 10-minute walk has been proven to have great health benefits.

● Joining national events that promote movement like National Senior Health and Fitness Day

and Falls Prevention Awareness Week. 

For more ideas, check out the CDC’s Physical Activity resource guide for older adults.

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002 from the Administration for Community 

Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking 

projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and conclusions. 

Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official ACL policy.

Created in partnership with the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs. For more 

information on NANASP, visit nanasp.org.
§ 401.5 Required equipment. ( a ) No vessel shall transit unless it is ( 1 ) Propelled by motor power that is adequate in the opinion of an officer; and
( 2 ) Marked and equipped in accordance with the requirements of § 401.6 to 401.21.
( b ) [Reserved]
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended and secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of Sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471)
[43 FR 25817, June 15, 1978, as amended at 45 FR 52378, Aug. 7, 1980]
FORM OF CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14
              UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dave Neville, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of FinancialContent, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of material  fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. As the registrant's  certifying officer I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and I have:

(a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared; and

(b) evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  and  presented  my  conclusions   about  the  effectiveness  of  the
disclosure  controls and  procedures as of the end of the period  covered by the
report; and

(c) disclosed in this report any changes in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. As the  registrant's  certifying  officer I have disclosed,  based on my most
recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's  auditors and the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all material weaknesses,  as well as significant  deficiencies in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize, and report financial information, have been disclosed; and

(b) any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date: September 28, 2006

/s/ DAVE NEVILLE
------------------------------
Dave Neville
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

     Inconnection with the annual report of TMSF Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to his knowledge: 

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Raymond EshaghianRaymond EshaghianChief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2005 

/s/ Masoud Najand Masoud NajandChief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2005 

     Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to thecompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
*NOT AVAILABLE*

CRC Report No. E-77-2

ENHANCED EVAPORATIVE EMISSION 

VEHICLES

(CRC E-77-2)

This report is currently not available

Due for release mid-2010

For information please contact:

Connie Hart (WAM)

Hart.Connie@epa.gov

(734) 214-4340
§ 334.155 Severn River, Naval Station Annapolis, Small Boat Basin, Annapolis, MD; naval restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The waters within the Naval Station Annapolis small boat basin and adjacent waters of the Severn River enclosed by a line beginning at the southeast corner of the U.S. Navy Marine Engineering Laboratory; thence to latitude 38°58′56.5′′, longitude 76°28′11.5′′; thence to latitude 38°58′50.5′′, longitude 76°27′52′′; thence to the southeast corner of the Naval Station's seawall.
( b ) *The regulations.* No person, vessel or other craft shall enter or remain in the restricted area at any time except as authorized by the enforcing agency.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy, in Annapolis, Maryland, and such agencies as he/she may designate.
[63 FR 68140, Dec. 9, 1998]
Exhibit 31.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Alex Demitriev certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MERILUS, INC.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors, any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 29, 2007          /s/  Alex Demitriev
                             Alex Demitriev, Chief Accounting Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**Encompass
      Group Affiliates, Inc.**


**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Encompass Group Affiliates, Inc. (the
      Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      SEC
      on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Donahue, Vice President and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Encompass Group Affiliates, Inc. and will be retained by Encompass Group
      Affiliates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.





Date:
      October 14, 2008





/s/
                John E. Donahue


John
      E.
      Donahue


Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer
1 Date: October 5, 2010 Subject: Minutes of the October 5 , 20 10 Conference Call with Representatives from Industry EPA Contract No. EP

- D

- 06

- 118; EPA Work Assignment No. 4

- 06 RTI Project No. 0210426.004.006

From: Chuck French OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243

- 02) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

To: Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0239

I

. Introduction

A conference call with representatives of the gold mining industry was held o n October 5 , 20 10

. This memorandum summarizes the majo r topics discussed during the meeting

.
II

. Attendees
Melissa Barbanell, Barrick Senior Counsel, Regulatory Policy Mike Tomko, Parsons Behle & Latimer
Chuck French, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Richard Marinshaw , RTI International Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

III

. D iscussion
The major topics discussed during the meeting included title V permitting, hydrogen cyanide, fugitive mercury emissions, Facility M and the new source carbon processes MACT limit, ore pretreatment processes MACT limit, and monitoring of the roas ter.
1 **EPA Docket EPA** **- R09**  **- OAR** **- 20**  **12 -**  **0 398** 

**Addendum 2 Additional Documents**  **R eferenced in**  **EPA’s Proposed Action on the Conflict of Interest Provisions for** 

**the Arizona**  **Infrastruc t** **ure SIP for the**  **1997 8 -**  **hour Ozone, 1997 PM** **2.5 ,**  **and 2006 PM** **2.5 National Ambient Air**  **Quality Standard (NAAQS )**  **: Partial Approval and Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation**  **Plans; Arizona; State Board Requirements for Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter**  **CATEGORY XI**  **. R** 

**ULEMAKING DOCUMENTS**  **FOR THE**  **CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROPOSAL**  A . Proposed Rule, “ Partial Approval and Disapproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Arizona; State Board Requirements for Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter , ” signed July 20, 2012 (prepublication version). B . Technical Support Document for E PA’s Proposed Action on the 2009 Infrastructure State Implemen t ation Plan ( Conflict of Interest ) for the State of Arizona , July 2012. C . Reserved for published version of conflict of interest notice . **CATEGORY X** **II .**  **OFFICIAL PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CONFLICT**  **OF INTEREST PROPOSAL**  [Reserved] **CATEGORY X** **III .**  **ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS**  **FOR THE**  **CONFLICT OF INTEREST PR**  **OPOSAL** A. A Legislative History of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 95 th Congress 2d Session, Volume 3 (August 1978). B. Memorandum from David O. Bickart to Regional Air Directors, “Guidance to States for Meeting Conflict of Interest Requirements of Section 128,” Suggest ed Definitions, March 2, 1978. **CATEGORY X** **IV .**  **A**

**DDITIONAL FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES**  **FOR THE** 2

**CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROPOSAL** A. 77 FR 21913 “Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Hawaii; Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8

- Hour Ozone and 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards” April 12, 2012.