### TESTREPORTTRANSMISSION SUMMARY (Submitseparatesummarysheetfor

### each pollutant

### testreport) 

# RECEIVED MAY 272009 

# IS Submit

### to: ISMPDatabase Ross Winne, Program Manager Industrial SoureeMonitoringProgram 4144 

### InternationalParkway, Suite 120 

### •.•..1.4.11'.**!!9J~~l!1!**

### ll!'!!lr!!.l1..s.f!!..f!.1J) •••••• 

### No.



### .Atlanta, GA 30354 MARTA

- Perry 

### Boulevard Compressed

### Natural Gas 

### Fueling Facility Facility Name:

----___--------------------------- 1600 Perry Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 Facility Address:
___ 

# =..._--------------:::-:-------:;:,.....------- Addresa City Zlp 

### Facility Contact,:,.:
___**D~aV1:.::·d:..:Ch=an::.:d::.:le:::..r**______ _ PhoneNo. (404) 739-96S0 

### PARTA Emission Point(one on1y): CompressorEngine No.1 (Emission UnitID No. PBO1)

- StackNo. SOO1 Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ PoJiutant 

### (one only):
__________________ Date testperformed: 412=812.::,00=9
__ _ Applicable Rule(s); Regu1atioD(s) orPermit**Conditions·;.,.,.gS.l&ljtC::ii::W1~·~dc** ....

TI.l.WJtJe
....**V:L.a;ML\:IScJ...T",,2S.L.tp~):**___________ _ Operating 

### capacity during test: 1,150

### RPM (Run

### ID Ul-l)



# -------------------------------------------- Computed allowable 

### emissionrate(s) orlimitation(s):
....**~----::"7--:-----:--:------------­** (Determined for each applicable tule. regulationorpermitcondition using same units) 

### Reported emissions to 

### atmosphere:
. O.1711bs/hr. (0.75 tpy) (In same units asrule. regUlation**or:-:pe=nn:'!it:-:co::::n==arniti~·on=)F~.;.;..;....;:;.:..:..-----------------** 

### Thetest report 

### should include a 

### compilation ofall CEMS.

### data, controldevise 

### parameters and 

### proc::ess operating data

### related to

### the

### test. PARTB Forany

### facility operating.under 

### a Part70 

### Permit,Condition 8.8.3 ofthatpermitrequires 

### the following certification sbould besigned by

### a responsibleofficial and ineluded 

### witb the report: I 

### certifythatbased on my Information andbeliefformed afterreasonableinquiry,thestatements 

### and information in this 

### reportare

### true, aecurate,and complete. Wendell Dallas 

# lJoJJJAJ)JL V.P., G.M., AGLC 

### NAME 

### SIGNATURE TITLE

Rev. 05130106 .'

### TESTREPORTTRANSMISSION SUMMARY 

### (Submit separatesummary sheetfor each 

### pollutanttest report) 

# RECEIVED MAY 27 Z009 

# ISMP
Submitto: ISMP Database Ross Winne,Program Manager Industrial SourceMonitoring Program 4244 InternationalParkway, Suite 120 Atlanta, GA

### 30354 

### • _ •.•L4.l!. fr!J!¥f!{0.l1**!!~cJ!. !!~f!** P",!ly)._.__• 

### No. 

# 9..00

MARTA

- PerryBoulevard CompressedNatural Oas Fueling Facility**F~illiyNmne:----~------------------------------------------------------** 1600 Pert)' Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 

### Facility Address:
___ -,..,..--________________**~----=_--------**

Add..... City Zip FacilityContact'!...·
____ ...;D:;,a:::.;:v:t:.:.;·d;..,;Chan=;;;;d::,::le;;.,f
_________ _ PhoneNo. (404)**739~96S0** 

### PARTA Emission

### Point(one only}: Compressor

### Engine No.1 (Emission

### UnitID No. PBOI)

-**S~k**

### No. SOO 

### 1 carbon Monoxide (CO) 

### Pollutant(one onJy):--------------------------Datetest perfonned: 4n.=8n..:;O:;.:O:.;;.9

__ _ ApplicableRule(s). Regulation(s) orPennitCOnditions;
...**Slil.ljt~C:i:.Iw:u;ldw;ei..lTUlitWilei..JVwM~ST.I....I.j,l** OOl!oU.ltpq.)!-----
_________ _ Maximum 

### expectedoperating**cap~ity:**____**l:..;!l.;..SO_RP...;;...;..M.;..(Run::;;.;..;...;.,,;ID~U_l...;.l)"__**_____________ _ Operating capacity during 

### test: 1,150RPM (Run ID UI-I) Computed allowable emission rate(s) orlimitation(s)_'
__**~-_------_-----------­** (Determined for each applicable rule., regulation Ofpermit condition usin, same units) lqlortedemissions to**atmosphere:==:-=O~.01'!:3~g ~lbr-sJbr**  __ (
.... O_.l_7..&tpL.!y)'---

________________ _ (In same units as rule, regulation OTpennlt

### condition) 

### Thetest reportshould include a compilation ofallCEMS data,controldevise parameters and process operatingdatarelated to the test. PARTB 

### Foranyfacility 

### operating undera Part70 Permit,Condition 8.8.3 oUhatpermitrequires the following certification should be signed by

### a responsible official and included with 

### thereport: I certifythatbased onmyinformationand belieffonned afterreasonable inqnlry,thestatements andinformation inthis 

### report aretrue, accurate, and complete. WendellDallas

# ~1MW.J>JL V.P., G.M., AGLC 

### NAME SIGNATURE 

### TITLE

Rev, 05130/06

### ( 

### TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMMARY (Submit separate summarysheetfor each poUutanttestreport)

# RECEIVED MAY 272009 

# ISMP
Submitto: ISMPDatabase 

### Ross Winne, Program Manager IndustrialSourceMonitoring Program 

### 4244 InternationalParkway,Suite 

### 120 Atlanta, GA30354 ••• .**_f~}!.!!!'!~'!l!:**fl.!f!!ll'.:;!**!!'f.~p'.'!lyJ**•••••• 

## No.

MARTA

- Perry Boulevard CompressedNatural Gas Fueling Facility FacilityNarnc:

--------------------------------- 

### 1600 Perry Boulevard. NW Atlanta 30318 Pacility Address:
__**~:---------------~----:;;:_-------** IuId1as City Zip Facility Contact:;..'
__ ...;D:::;;a::,::v1..:;:·d:,,;:Chan=::.::d:,:::ler:.:...-
______ _ PhoneNo. (404) 739-9650 

### fARTA EmissionPoint (one only): CompressorEngine No.1 (EmissionUnit 10No. PBOl)

- StackNo. SOOI Nitrogen Oxides (No..) Pollutant (one ouly):
__________________ Date testperformed:**4:.:12~812.:;.O:.:O~9**__ _ Applicable RuIe{s), R.egulation(s) or Permit Conditions
... : ....**S~Ite-)I;;;w.u.I&.W·** dH..C**T,.\.ji~de"'-y~MIoIiIS**.. T

..

2Sol..tplo,w:.y

__________ _ Maximum expected operating capacity:
__ l
.....

&

...**O_O_RP_M~(R.un** ____ ID_U_l._M)
_______________ _ Operating capacity during test 1,800 RPM (RnnID Ut-M) Computed allowable emission rate(s) orlimitation(s):
____________________ _ (Determined for each applicable 

### rule. regulation orpermitcondition using same units)**~orted** emissions to**atmosphere:~=:-=O~.SJ!:3~2~lb~sIh-r-.**(.;:..2_.3_3..:,tp""'y)=--

_______________ _ (In

### same units 

### as rute, regulation orpermit Cliidition) 

### Thetest reportshould include a compUation ofaU CEMS data,controldevise parameters and process operatingdatarelated to

### the

### test. PARTB 

### Forany facility 

### operatingunder a Part70 

### Permit, Coudition 8.8.3 

### ofthatpermitrequires the 

### following certification should besigned 

### by a responsibleofficial and included with

### the report: 

### I certifythatbased onmyinformation and beliefformed afterreasonableinquiry,thestatements 

### and Information In this 

### reportare

### true, accurate, and complete. WendellDallas 

# bloUJ.{])Jh V.P., G.M., AGLC 

# slzy1'5 NAME SIGNATURE 

### TITLE DATE

Rev. 05/3Qf06

### (ee
\ 

### TEST REPORTTRANSMISSION SUM:.MARY 

### (Submitseparate summarysheetfor eachpollutanttest report) 

# RECEIVED MAY 272009 

# ISMP
Submitto: ISMPDatabase Ross Winne, Program :Manager Industrial SourceMonitoring Program 

### 4244 InternationalParkway, Suite 

### 120 Atlanta, GA

### 30354 . _____**(~}!..f!!J!!ffi()llfl.!f!!.r_c..~_~l!.!1l!I]L.**___ 

### No. 

# .YJ

MARTA- Perry 

### Boulevard Compressed Natural OasFueling 

### Facility**F~RyNmne:** ------------------------------------------------------------ 1600 Perry Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 Facility Address:
___**~~---------------------__:::~---__::::---------** Address Cil.)' Zip Facility Contact:...:
_____**D::.a::.:v~id:..;Ch=and=ler::=._**_________ _ PhoneNo. (404) 739-9650 

### PART A Emission Point (one only): CompressorEngine

### No.1 (Emission UnitID 

### No. PBOI)

- Stack

### No. 

### sao 1 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Pollutant (one only):
___________________ 

### -Datetestperfonned:**41U=12.::0:.::0~9**__ _ Applicable Rule(s), R.egulation(s) orPennitConditions_:**~S!tIoUiC::i::.lwlx.&iwde** .... TUAitJl.\Iic

.... VL..M=ST.&_Ul**ooa.t..lltp~X~--_----------** Maximum expectedoperating capacity:_
.......**l.,g_OO.;..RP;.;.;;...;M~(Rnn=_ID;;.....;;;.U..;;.l-.;..M)~**________________ _ Operating capacity during test 1,800RPM (Run 1D Ul-M) Computed allowable emission rate(s) orlimitation(s)
.... : ____________________ _ (Detc:nnined for each applicable rule. regulation orpennitcondition using same units) Reported 

### emissions

### to**atmosphere:~='l::"'!"=.'I::_:.4!!:2:!':lb:"::'s/hr__r**

### ..... (6_.22--.jtp:..:;y
..... )
________________ _ (In same units as rule, Rigulation orpermit condition) 

### Thetest report.honld include a compBationofall CEMS data, controldevise parameters and process operatingdata related tothetest. . PARTB Forany facility operatingunder a Part70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 ofthatpermit requires the following certification should be signed by

### a responsibleofficial and induded with thereport: 

### I certifythatbased 

### on my information

### and beliefformed 

### afterreasonable inquiry, the statements and information inthis reportaretrue, accurate,and complete. Wendell Dallas 

# LJPMhl1:J):1L. V.P., G.M., AGLC 

### NAME SIGNATURE 

### TITLE

Rev. 05/30106

### TEST REPORTTRANSMISSION SUMMARY (Submit separate summarysheet for each pollutant

### testreport) 

# RECEIVED MAY 2 72009 

# ISMP
Submitto: 

### ISMP Database Ross Winne, Program Manager Industrial SourceMonitoringProgram 

### 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 

### Atlanta, GA30354 •••••**f~}!.frP.~{(]l! 1!~!'..cJ!.!!:s..I!!1..1J.lpL** •••• 

### No. 

# 0

MARTA- Perry 

### Boulevard CompressedNatural Gas Fueling Facility Facility Name: 1600 PenyBoulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 Facility Address: Address Cil), Zip Facility Contact: David Chandler PboneNo. (404) 739-9650 

### PART A Emission Point (one only): CompressorEngine No.2 (Emission Unit1DNo. PB02)

- StackNo. S002 Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ PoJlutant(one only):------------------Datetest performed: 4/2.8=12.:,;0:;.:::0_9

__ _ ApplicableRule(s1 R.egulation(s) orPermItCOnditions·
.........

S....,jtc="";m""'·
... 

### de

....

Tj"""""'tle

....



### v"'-'of;MST

........... 2S

..**tp~y**__________ _ Maximum expected operating capacity:
__ l_..1_S_0_RP_M.......;(R_Wl_ID_U_2_-I)"--

______________ _ Operating capacity during test: 1,150RPM (Run lD U2-I) Computed allowable emissionrate(s) 

### Orlimitation(s:)
.... · ____________________ _ (Detennined for each applicablerule. regulationorpennitcondition using same units) Reported emissions 

### to**atmosphere:"=-==::-=O~.7ri:3:!::4_::;lbrslhr.;.;.;.;...** <.::;;.3.;.;;..22.;.;...;:;tp..::"y)'--
_______________ _ (In same units as rule, regulation or

### pettiiitcondition) 

### Thetest report should include 

### a compilation or

### aU CEMS data,controldeviseparameters and process operatingdata related tothe test. 

### PARTB Forany

### facDity operatingunder 

### a Part70

### Permit,Condition

### 8.8.3 ofthatpermit requires 

### the following certification should be 

### signed by 

### a responsible official and included with the report: 

### I certifythatbased on 

### myinformation 

### and beliefformed afterreasonable

### inquiry,the statements and information in this reportare

### true, accurate, and complete.
. WendeD Dallas

# ~1~ V.P., G.M.,AGLC 

### NAME SIGNATURE 

### TITLE

# ~ \ Rev.05J3OJOe

### TESTREPORT TRANSMISSION SU.MMARY 

### (Submit separate summary sbeetfor each pollutanttestreport) 

# RECEIVED MAY 272009 

# ISMP Submitto: ISMP Database 

### Ross Winne, Program Manager industrialSourceMonitoring

### Program 4244 InternationalParkway, 

### Suite 120 

### Atlanta, GA 303S4 

### MARTA

- Perry Boulevard 

### Compressed Natura1 

### Gas Fueling Facility Facility Name: 1600 PerT)' Boulevard. NW Atlanta 30318 Facility Address: Addn:ss City ZIp Facility Contact: 

### David Chandler PhoneNo. (404) 739-9650 

### PARTA Emission Point(one only): CompressorEngineNo.2 (Emission UnitID No. PB02)

- StackNo. S002 CarbonMonoxide (CO) Pollutant (one only):
__________________Date testperformed: 4:.::128.,.12,;:,00::;.;..:;.,9

__ _ Applicable Rule(s). Regulation{s) orPennit**COnditioIlS·_S~j~te""'-Wl"""·** d
.... e .... Ti""it
.... Je

..... V
.....

M"""""ST
.........

lOOl.loUjtp""')!
__________ _ Maximum expected operating**eapacity:_--..;l~.l;..;;.SO_RP....;;;...;.M~(Rnn** ........_ID_U2-
........**~I)** _______________ _ Operating capacitydtuing test: 1,150RPM (Run ID U2-1) Computed allowable emission rate(s) orlimitation(s):
_____________________ _ (Determined foreach applicablerule, resuJation 

### orpennit condition using same units) Reported emissionsto atmosphere: 8.85 Ibslhr
. (38.16 tpy) 

### Qn 

### same units asrule, IeguIation**or~pe~nn='!:it~co~n~dil'!::ttr.:"on='l)~~-""""""-----------------** 

### Thetest report should include a 

### eompRation ofallCEMS

### data,oontrol devise parameters and process operating datarelated to thetest. 

### EARTB Forany facility 

### operatingundera Part70 Permit,Condition 8.8.3 ofthatpermitrequiresthe following certification should be

### signed by

### a responsibleofficial and included with the

### report: I certify thatbased on my 

### information and beliefformed afterreasonableinquiry, the statements 

### and information in this report aretrue, accurate, and eomplete. WendellDallas 

# iliMll:DdL V.P., G.M., AGLC

# s/~loc, NAME 

### SIGNATURE 

### TITLE DATE

Rev. 05130106 I 

# I

### Submitto: TESTREPORTTRANSMISSION SUMl\1ARY (Submit separate summary sheetfor each pollutant test report)
Ross Winne, Program Manager Industrial SourceMonitoring Program 4244 InternationalParkway, Suite llO Atlanta, GA30354
.. MARTA- Perry 

### Boulevard CompressedNatural Gas Fueling Facility Facility Name: 

# RECEIVED MAY 

# 272009 

# "viP

1600 Perry Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 Facility Address: Addrcsl CII), Zip Facility Contact: David Chandler Phone No. (404) 739-9650


### PART

### A Emission Point(one only): Compressor**~e**No.3 (Emission Unit ID No. PS03)

- Stack No. 8003 Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ 

### Pollutant (oneonly):------------------Datetest

### perfunned: 412=812,::;;00=.9
__ _ AppIicable Rule(s), 

### Regulation(s) orPermitConditions_' · ... sw.:ite-IO::W'I;u,·""de.T.A.lilioli tle

...**.lC....U: wS-.&.T-"'25..z..tpy~** __________ _ Maximum expected operating capacity:
__ l....:;.1_S_O
... RPM

__**~(Ru;;..;.....;.n** ... ID;;..;.....;.U_3_-I)'--
______________ _ Operating capacity during test: 1,150 RPM (Run ID m-I) Computed allowable emission

### ntte(sTorIimitation{s):
...__ --:-_-:-__ -. ____________ _ (Detennined foreach applica.ble role, regulation orpennitcondition using same wits) Reported emissions to**atmosphere:~==:!:=-=2:::::.1r.:7rilb='slhrr__** •**..;;.(9-.S-1~tpy~)**________________ _ (In same 

### witsas rule, regulation orpenntt colidition) 

### The test 

### reportshould include a compilation ofall CEMS data, control devise parameters and process operating

### data related to the

### test. PARTB Foranyfacility operatingunder a Part70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 ofthatpermit requires the foUowing certification should besigned by 

### a responsible official and included 

### withthe report: 

### I certifythatbased onmy information 

### and beliefformed after reasonableinquiry, thestatements and 

### information In this 

### reportare

### true, accurate, and complete. Wendell Dallas

# ~1JJL V.P., GM.,AGLC 

### NAME SIGNATURE 

### TITLE

Rev.05J30106

### TEST REPORT TRANSMISSION SUMMARY (Submitseparatesummary sheetfor each pollutanttest 

### report) 

# RECEIVED MAY 

## 272009 

# ISMP Submitto: ISMPDatabase Ross Winne, Program Manager Industrial SourceMonitoringProgram 4244 International Parkway, Suite 120 Atlanta, GA 30354 _____**!dlt_ft!l!'!f!{o-':_l}~_cf!!!~liP_'W~_**••••• 

### No.

MARTA- Peny 

### Boulevard 

### CompressedNatural Gas Fueling Facility FacllityName:

------------------------------ 1600 Perry 

### Boulevard. NW 

### Atlanta 30318 Facility Address:
__**~~-------------~~---__::."-------** A<I<Iru> Cit)' Zip**FacllityCo~~'**

### ___**~D~~~w~crum~~d_Ie_r**

### ______ ___ Phone No. (404) 739·9650 

### PARTA Emission Point (one only): 

### CompressorEngineNo.3 (EmissionUnit ID No. PB03)

- StackNo. S003 CarbonMonoxide (CO) Pollutant(one on}y):-----
........

# --------'------Datetestperformed:**412=8/2:.;0:;..;09~**__ _ 

### Applicable 

### RuJe(s). Reglllation(s) or

### PermitConditions_'
.... Si

.... te=""'WJ
....



### ·d
....

e .... Tj

.....

t
.... 

### le....,V'-'MS=T
........**l00~tp~)!** 

### __________ _ Maximum expectedoperating 

### capacity:
__ l_..l_50_RP_M
.....

{Ru_n_ID_U_3.,..;l)
_______________ _ Operating 

### capacity during test: 1,150 RPM 

### (Run ID U3-I)



# ---------------------------------- Computed allowable emission rate(s) or limitation(s)
..... :**~_-** ________..:.---------- 

### (Determined for each applicablerole, regulation orpermit condition using same units) Reported emissions to atmosphere: l.22lbslhr (5.34 tpy) (In

### same units as role, regulation**or~p~e~rm~it~co~na!!o:it1~o~n}i:---~;....;...;;~-----------------** 

### Thetest

### report should include a compilation ofall CEMS data, control devise parameters and process operatingdata related tothe test. PARTB 

### For

### anyfacUity 

### operatingunder a Part

### 70 Permit, Condition 

### 8.8.3 ofthatpermitrequires the following certification shouldbe 

### signed by a 

### responsible official and

### included with the 

### report: 

### I certifythatbased on my information 

### andbeliefformed afterreasonableinquiry,the statements and information 

### in this reportaretrne, accurate, and complete. Wendell Dallas 

# "\tv1..kJ)J(,. V.P., G.M.,AGLC NAME 

### SIGNATURE 

### TITLE

Rev. 05130/06

### TESTREPORTTRANSMISSIONSUMMARY (Submit separatesummarysheetfor each pollu.tant test report) 

# RECEIVED MAY 

## 27 20DR 

# ISMP Submit to: ISMPDatabase Ross Winne, Program Manager IndustrialSourceMonitoringProgram 4244 InternationalParkway, Suite 120 Atlanta, GA 30354 

### ••___f.-1i! • .f'!!!!!f!:i..o.'11!!1J!l.c!!1!'.lLo..n../Y).
___._ 

### No. ()

MARTA- Perry 

### Boulevard CompressedNatural Gas 

### Fueling

### Facility**F~Ui~N~:--------------------------------------------~--------------** 1600 Perry Boulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 Facility Address:
__ -"..,.,.---
________________**~------_-=------------**

Address aty Zip 

### Facility**COntact::...-_~Da=VI.:;:·d;..;:Ch=an.:;:d1.:;:e;;..r**__________ _ Phone 

### No. (404) 739-9650 

### rARTA Emission Point(one 

### only): CompressorEngineNo.3 (Emission UnitOJNo. PB03)

- StackNo. 

### 8003 Nitrogen Oxides (NO,,) PoUutant(one only):--------------------------DatetestperfOrmed:**4:::J2~912.:::;O~O~2** __ _ Applicable Rule(s). Regulation(s)orPennit Conditions_'**,..\lSll.lliteii::-w.l:l'.iwde!ii..n..u.u:tle!ii..y.x....Q:M.wS~T""2"'-S**

### .ljl'Dl,jC.y------------- 

### Maximum expected operating**capacity:_~1~.8;..;.O_0.;.....RP.;.....M~(Ru...;;.;,,;,.n.;;;;m;..;.U3.;;..._.::M).....J..**

### _____________ _ Operating**capaci~** duringtest: 1,800RPM (RunID Ul-M) Computed allowable emission rate(s) orlimitation(s):
_____________________ .......___**~**__ _ (Determined for each applicable rule, regulation Ot'permitcondition using same units) Reported 

### emissions to**atmospbere:~=r.:-:=1=::.1n::2.!:Ib='slhrr_.~(4-.9-1....ltp:.:.y"-)**

### __________ --:-_____ _ (In

### same units as rule, 

### regulation orpermitcondrtion) 

### The

### test report should include a compilation ofall CEMSdata,controldevise parameters and process operatingdata related

### to thetest. 

### PARTB Foranyfacility operatingunder a Part70Permit, Condition 8.8.3 ofthatpermitrequires the foRowing certification should be signed 

### bya responsibleofficial and includedwith the report: I certify that based on myinformation and beliefformed after reasonableinquiry,thestatements and information in this report are

### true, acc:urate, and complete. WendellDallas

## ~.})JL V.P., G.M.,AGLC NAME SIGNATURE 

### TITLE

Rev. 05130106/- '. 

### TESTREPORTTRANSMISSION SUMMARY 

### (Submitseparatesummarysheetfor each pollutanttestreport) 

# RECEIVED MAY 

# 27 ?I)Q9

Submitto: ISMP

### Database Ross Winne, Program Manager Industrial SourceMonitoringProgram 4244 InternationalParkway, Suite 120 Atlanta, GA 30354 •••**_.f~}!_l'!P!'E!.ip.ll!!!IJ!Z..C!!J!.s.e;.!!-,!Ij)**••••__ 

### No.


## MARTA

- Pen:yBoulevard CompressedNatural Gas FuelingFacility**F~W~Name:-------------------------------------------------------------** 1600 PerryBoulevard, NW Atlanta 30318 Facility Address:
__**~=~**

# ______________**.....,:~**

# _____**--:;:~**

# _____ _ Address City Zip**F~ilU;y** Contact,:...:
__ -=:D::,:8vi:,::d:.,;C:::;:h::an::::d::::le:;:,.r
_______ _ PhoneNo. (404) 739-9650 

### PARTA Bmission Point (one only): ComPressorEngineNo.3 (EmissionUnit InNo. PBOl)

- StackNo. S003 CarbonMonoxide (CO) 

### Pollutant(one 

### onJy}:
_______________________Date

### testperformed: 

### ,412=9120=0;.:;.9
____ _

. Applicable Rule(s), Regulation(s) orPermit**COndjtions·_Slil.ljt.Uie-~wufd** ...**e'_lTl.l.ljt"'"leo..ly'_'MioJ;I.IiI.ST.Io...I.I10Ilo.lQ.Ioltp~y_-------------** Maximum expected operating capacU;y:
__ l.:.,.B

.... OO_RP_M
........

(Ru

........

n....

ID

........

Ul_
..... 

### M)

......_______________ _ Operating capacity during test: 1,800 RPM (Run 

### JD Ul-M) Computed allowabJe emissionrate(s) or limitation(s)'
____________________ _ (Determined for each applicable rule. regulation orpermitcondition using same units) Reported emissions to**atmosphere:~=:_=.0::'.l.40ift5~lbF_s/hr~(~1.;.;.77** ....1py=)=-----

__**---------~­** (In sameunits as rule, regulation orpermit condition) 

### Thetest reportshould include a compilation ofall CEMS data,'controldevise parameters and process operatingdata related to the

### test. PARTB ForanyfacUity operatingundera Part70 Permit, Condition 8.8.3 ofthatpermit requires the following certification should besigned by a responsible official and includedwith the report: I certify thatbased on my Information and belieffanned afterreasonableinquiry, the statements and information in this reportare

### true, accurate, and complete. Wendell Dallas V.P., G.M., AGLC

# b~l1]:)JL SIGNATURE 

# sl-u./r!f. DATE NAME 

### TITLE

Rev,05l30J06! \ .. 

# CTRC RECEIVED MAY 272009 

# ISMp·

AIREMISSION TESTPROGRAM

TRCPROJECTNO:
TESTDATE:
TYPE OF TESTS:

TESTLOCATION:
TESTSITE:

COUNTY:
TRC CONTA CT: 166419 

### April28 -29, 

### 2009 Performance Tesung for Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Volumetric Flow Rate, Nitrogen Oxides, and Carbon Monoxide Thref!ReciprocaungInternal Combustion Engines
Atlanta GasLight Company MARTA PerryBoulevardFacility Natural Gas CompressorStation 1600Perry Qoulevard, NW Atlanta, Georgla 30318
Fulton County
Kenneth R. Loder PrincipalScienust 919-256-6239

### TABLE OFCONTENTS SECTION 

### PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION
................................................................................................................. 1-1 2 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 GENERAL
................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 SAMPIlN"G ANOMALIES
..................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 CO Analyzer Operating Range
.................................................................... 2-1 2.2.2 NOx Analyzer Operating Range
.................................................................. 2-1 2.2.3 Aborted Run
................................................................................................. 2-2 3 

### SOURCE DESCRIPTION
.................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 SOURCE DESCRIPTION
....................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 REFERENCE METHOD SAMPLING LOCATIONS
........................................... 3-2 4 

### SAMPLING AND

### ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
.......................................................... 4-1 

### 4.1 GENERAL
................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 EPA METHOD 1(SAMPLING POINTS)
.............................................................. 4-1 4.3 EPA METHOD 2 (VOLUMETRIC FWW}

...........................................................

### 4-2 4.4 EPA METHOD 4 (FLUE GAS MOISTURE}
......................................................... 4-2 4.5 INSTRUMENTALTESTING (02. 

### CO2 •

### NOx AND 

### CO}
...................................... 4-2 4.5.1 SaIllple Collection
........................................................................................ 4·2 4.5.2 Analyzer Descriptions
................................................................................. 4-3 4.5.3 Calibration and Results
................................................................................ 4-5 5 QAlQC 

### PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
..........................................................................**5~1** 

### 5.1 GENERAL
................................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 BAROMETER
......................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 PITOTTUBES
......................................................................................................... 5-2 5.4 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE INDICATORS
....................................................... 5-2 5.5 THERMOCOUPLES AND 

### DIGITAL INDICATORS
..........................................**5~2** 

### 5.6 CALffiRATION METERAND METERING SYSTEM
....................................... 5-2 5.8 POST-TEST CALffiRATION CHECK
.................................................................. 5-3 5.7 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM QAlQC
.......................... 5-3 

### 5.8 DATA REDUCTION ANDVALIDATION
........................................................... 5·3



### ii

### Table of Contents



## LIST OFTABLES

TABLE TITLE PAGE TestResults Summaries 2-1 Compressor Engine No. 1
.....................................................................................................2-2 2-2 Compressor Engine No. 2
.....................................................................................................2-3 2-3 Compressor Engine No.3
................................................................................................2-4

LIST OFAPPENDICES APPENDIXA· FIELD DATA 1. Method 1-4 data 2. Raw CEM Data APPENDIX B CALIBRATION DATA 1. M2-4 CalibrationDocwnentation 2. Site Specific Analyzer Checks 3. Calibration Gas Certificates ofAnalysis 4. Analyzer Performance Checks APPENDIX C PROCESS DATA

# ----- SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION


### TRC Environmental Corporation (TRC) was contracted by Smith Aldridge, Inc. to conduct air emissions testing on three natural gascompressor engines (Caterpillar Model G3408-TAW) at the Atlanta Gas Light

- MARTA Peny Boulevard Facility located in Atlanta, Georgia. These compressor engines are used in refueling compressed natural gas (eNG)public transportation buses and other city vehicles. The three compressor engines are commonly referred to as Engines I, 2, and 3 and are labeled as such 

### in this report. The test program included the determination ofeffluent volumetric flow rate, oxygen (02), carbon dioxide (C02), nitrogen oxides (NOl() and carbon monoxide (CO). The test program's objective was to determine the NOx and CO emissions from the engines during normal operation and while at idle. The test program was conducted in accordance with the Test Plan submitted to Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, Air Protection Branch (GA-DNR) and the revised test schedule specified byGA-DNR.
Ken Loder and Matt Brooks ofTRC's Raleigh AirMeasurement Group performed the test program on April 28

- 29,2009. Craig Smith ofSmith Aldridge, LLC coordinated the test program and was assisted byDavid Chandler ofthe facility. Greg Preves ofthe facility oversaw the operation ofthe compressor engines during the test program. Frank Nederhand of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, Air Protection Branch was present and observed the test program. A summary and discussion ofthe testresults are provided in Section 2. The source description, test procedures and quality assurance activities are described in the subsequent sections. All supporting field data, analytical reports, and calibrationrecords are provided in the appendices.

1-1

### SECTION 2 SUMMARY OFTEST RESULTS 2.1 GENERAL
TRC followed the procedures detailed in the test protocol with the revised sampling schedule as specified byGA-DNR. This program served as a follow up to an initial test program conducted on October 1- 2, 2008. One thirty-minute test run was conducted on all three engines while each engine was operating at an idle load condition and one sixty minute test run was conducted on engines I and 3 while each was operated at normal full load operating conditions. Tables 

### 2-1, 2-2 and 

### 2-3 summarize the results ofthe emission testing conducted on compressor engines No. I, 2 and 3, respectively. During testing each compressor engine was operated under normal full load at an RPM setting of approximately 1800 RPM. Atlanta Gas Light personnel monitored the operation ofeach engine throughout each test run and ensured they were operating properly. The operating temperatures ofeach ofthe Non Selective Catalytic Reduction (NSCR) units on each engine were observed during each test run and the facility recorded inlet and outlet gas temperatures ofthe catalyst during each test run. The facility collected process data collected during the testprogram is contained in Appendix 

### C. Complete copies ofthe test results, field sampling data sheets, analytical data, and calibration data are presented inthe appendices ofthis document. Process data collectedbythe facility is contained in Appendix C. 

### 2.2 SAMPLING ANOl\fALIES 2.2.1 COAnalyzer OperatingRange During the testing conducted on Engine No.2 atidle conditions, the average CO concentrations exceeded the upper span calibration standard (8,875 ppm CO) used to calibrate the CO analyzer. No data was truncated and the run average was valid, but technically the data doesn't meet the data validation criteria defined in Method 10. 

### 2.2.2 NOx Analyzer OperatingRange During the testing conducted on Engine No.3 at idle conditions, the average NOx concentrations exceeded the upper span calibration standard (1,013 ppm NOx) used to calibrate the NOx analyzer. No data was truncated and the run average was valid, but technically the data doesn't meet the data validation criteria defined in Method 7E.
2-1(



### • 

## 2.2.3 Aborted 

## Run Section 2 Summary of TestResults



### The initial Engine No. 1

### nonnal full load test 

### run was aborted afteritwas detennined the Engine was not operating properly. The engine operation was optimized and the test run was re-initiated and completed successfully. The data for the aborted 

### run is included along with the raw CEM 

### data in Appendix 

## A-2.

TABLE 2-1**TESTRESULTSS~Y** 

### COMPRESSORENGINE NO.1 ATLANTA GAS LIGHT COMPANY l\fARTA PERRY BOULEVARD FACILITY RunID UI-I UI-M Engine Operating Condition Idle Maximum Date 4/28/09 4128109 

### Time 21:23 -21:52 22:49

- 23:48 

### Run Duration, minutes 30 60 

### Volumetric FlowRate, DSCFH 12,675 23,162 

### Moisture Content, %v H 2

### O 

### 15.15 19.35 

### O

2 

### Concentration, %vd 6.4 0.0 

### CO2 

### Concentration, %vd 8.0 11.6 

### NOx Concentration, ppmvd 112.7 192.3 

### CO Concentration, ppmvd 41.1 845.3


### NOx Emissions, lblhr 0.171 0.532 

### CO Emissions, Iblhr 0.038 1.42

2-3

### TABLE 2-2 

## TEST RESULTS SUl\fM:ARY COMPRESSORENGINE NO.2 ATLANTA GAS LIGHTCOMPANY 

## MARTA PERRY BOULEVARD FACILITY RunID U2-J Engine Operating Condition Idle Date 

### 4/28/09 Time 18:38 -19:07 

### Run Duration, minutes 30 

### Volumetric Flow Rate, DSCFH \1\1(;. 

### 11 905 

## , Moisture Content, %v H2

### O 

### 19.84 O2 

### Concentration, %vd 0.1 

### CO2 

### Concentration, %vd 10.8 

### NOx Concentration, ppmvd 

### 516 CO Concentration, ppmvd lO,224
NOx Emissions, Iblhr 0.734 

### CO Emissions, Iblbr 8.85



### 2-4 

## Section 2 Summary 01TestResults

### TABLE 2-3 TEST RESULTS SUMMARY 

## COMPRESSORENGINE NO.3 

## Section 2 Summary o/TestResults



### ATLANTA GAS LIGHTCOMPANY MARTA PERRYBOULEVARD FACILITY RunID U3-1 U3-M Engine Operating Condition Idle Maximum Date 4/28/09 4/29/09 

### Time 20:08

- 20:37 00:03

- 01:02 Run Duration, minutes 30 60 Volumetric Flow Rate, DSCFH 27,442 Moisture Content, %v H2

### O 19.35 18.91 O2 

### Concentration, %vd 0.3 0.0 CO2 

### Concentration, %vd 11.3 11.6 NOx Concentration, ppmvd 1,701 343 , CO Concentration, ppmvd 1,567 203
NOx Emissions, Iblhr 2.17 

### 1.12 CO Emissions, 

### Ib/hr 1.22 0.405



### 2-5

### ( SECTION 3 SOURCE DESCRIPTION 3.1 SOURCE DESCRIPTION The Atlanta Gas Light Company

- MARTA Perry Boulevard Facility is a natural gas pipeline compressor station that is used to refill city ofAtlanta public transportation buses and other city vehicles, such as police cars. The three natural gas compressor engines are Caterpillar Model G3408-TAW which is fueled offpipeline grade natural gas. Compressor Engine No.1 has a serial number of3WR00482, Engine No.2 serial number is 3WR00484 and Engine No.3 has a serial number of 3WR00483. The three engines share a common natural gas meter. The compressors are rich-bum engines that provide emissions reduction through the use of NSCR 3-way converters that reduce the NOx, CO, and HC emissions. The engines are primarily operated during the late afternoon hours into the evening in order to refuel public transportation buses as needed. 

### 3.2 REFERENCE METHOD SAMPLINGLOCATIONS Reference method sampling for volumetric flow rate, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide was conducted on each engine at the outlet ofthe catalyst bed. Each unit has a separate catalyst bed, which is located directly above the compressor engine. Each ofthe three engines had identical reference method sampling locations with two horizontal test ports installed 90 degrees apart located approximately 18 feet above grade. The internal diameter of each circular exhaust stack was 8 inches. TRC completed a Method 1 traverse point data sheet and sketch ofthe location, which is included with the field data sheets in Appendix A. TRC determined the closest upstream disturbance to be 2.62 diameters upstream of the sample port location and the closest downstream disturbance to be 2.37 diameters away.\, "



# c .. SECTION4 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

## 4.1 GENERAL
All sampling and analytical procedures used in this test program were based on procedures published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These sampling and analytical procedures are contained in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A published by EPA. Copies of these methods are available from the EPA EMC electronic bulletin board or the Code of Federal Regulations. The test program was conducted according to the approved Georgia DNR test protocol submitted in advance ofthetesting.
TheTRC test team utilized the following EPA Reference Methods:
Method 1 Sample and VelocityTraverse Point Locations Method 

### 2 Determination ofVolumetric Flow from Stationary Sources Method 3A Detennination ofOxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental AnalyzerProcedure) Method 

### 4 Determination ofMoisture Content in Stack Gases Method 7E Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) Method 

### 10 Determination ofCarbon Monoxide Emissions.from Stationary Sources
The gaseous compounds ofthis sampling

- 

### 02, C02, NOx, and CO

- were collected using TRC's mobile continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS). 

### 4.2 EPA METHOD 1 (SAMPLING POINTS)
The number and location of the sampling points were determined according to the procedures outlined in EPA Method 

### 1. Eight 

### (8) points were sampled along two 

### (2) axes for a total of sixteen (16) points. A cyclonic flow determination was conducted during the test program and the effluent stream was found to meet the requirements ofMethod 1 for the absence ofcyclonic flow.



### 4-1i 

### ,. 

### 4.3 EPA METHOD 2 (VOLUMETRIC FLOW) 

### Section 4 Sampling andAnalyticalProcedures



### The velocity was determined according to the procedures outlined in EPA Method 2. Velocity head (delta P) measurements were made using a Type S Pitot tube confonning to the geometric specifications outlined 

### in EPA Method 2 and having a coefficient of0.84. Differential pressures were measured using a fluid manometer. Flue gas temperatures were measured using chromelalumel thermocouples and digital readouts. During each one hour test run a pair ofEPA Method 2 traverses were conducted and the average volumetric flow rate for the pair was used in detennining the emissionrates calculated. 

### 4.4 EPA METHOD 4 (FLUE GAS MOISTURE) The moisture content was determined using instrumentation and test procedures that confonn to the requirements ofEPA Method 4. A single point located in the center ofthe exhaust stack was sampled during the moisture determination and the meter box was operated at a constant flow rate equal to the Delta H ofthe meter consoL A single moisture determination was conducted during each pair ofEPA Method 2 determinations. The moisture results ofeach EPA Method 4 sample train was also used as a quality control check and the detailed results ofthese moisture determinations is included 

### in Appendix A. Theresults ofmoisture determinations indicated that good sampling techniques were employed and eachrunwas leak free. 

### 4.5 INSTRUMENTAL TESTING (01 ; 

### COl, NOx, AND CO)
The instrumental analyzer testing was conducted according to the procedures ofEPA Methods 3A, 7E, and 

### to. An extractive system provided a continuous, conditioned sample (free ofwater vapor and particulate matter) to the analyzers. This system is described in Section 4.5.1. Prior to initiating sampling all performance checks were successfully completed on the instruments, which included interference checks, on-site NOx analyzer**N~** 

### converter efficiency check, site specific response time determinations. The data documenting the analyzer performance check performed during this test program are contained in Appendices 

### B-2 and 

### B4.


### 4.5.1 Sample Collection The sample collection system consisted ofa stainless-steel probe with a particulate filter, sample lines, a moisture removal trap, and a sample pump. All effluent samples were drawn from the center ofeach exhaust stack sampling location. All effluent gas samples were routed through a
4-2

### ( 

### Section 4 Sampling andAnalyticalProcedures


### distribution manifold board for delivery to the analyzers. The gas samples were distributed to the individual gas analyzers at near atmospheric pressure and excess sample flow from the system was vented outside the trailer.
A second sample line delivered calibration gases from the control panel inside the trailer to the exit ofthe sample probes. During system calibration checks (Bias & 

### Drift Checks), the gas flow was slightly greater than the total sample collection system flow and the small amount ofexcess calibration gas was vented through the probe assembly. The configuration of·the sampling system allows for the injection ofcalibration gases directly to the analyzers as required by some ofthe test methods. All pretest and posttest calibration procedures were performed as outlined in the specific EPA methods. The sampling locations of each of the three engines were checked for the presence of stratification during the previous test program conducted in October 2008. The results of the stratification checks on all three engines indicated the locations were not stratified. Appendix

.B-2 contains the results ofthe stratification checks that were perfonned previously.
4.5.2 Analyzer Descriptions Oxygen. A California Analytical Instrument Model 200 was used to determine the concentration of O2 in the flue gas stream. This instrument utilizes a paramagnetic transducer that measures the 02 from the atmosphere surrounding the measuring probe. The consumption of02 generates a proportional electrical current. This current is then amplified and provides a signal output, which corresponds to a full-scale measurement range ofzero to 

### 25 percent O2 . The 02 analyzer was operated with a high calibration standard of23.95% O2 . Carbon Dioxide. A California Analytical Model200t 

### or similar, nondispersive infrared (NDIR) analyzer was used to continuously monitor the C02 concentration in the flue gas stream. The theory of operation for this analyzer is based on the principle that C02 gas has a unique absorption line spectrum in the infrared region. The instrument consists of an infrared light source, a Chopper, a measuring cell, and a detector. The infrared light beam emitted by the source passes through the measuring cell filled with a continuously flowing gas sample. The light beam is partially absorbed or attenuated by the gas species of interest in this cell before reaching the front chamber ofthe detector. The CO2analyzer was operated on an analyzer range 

# C. of20% CO2with a high calibration standard of 18.93% CO2 .
4-3

### i·

{

# . Section 4 SamplingandAnalyticalProcedures


### Nitrogen Oxides. 

## An API Model 200AH, or similar, NO! NO:zINO)t analyzer was used for the NOx monitoring. The analyzer automatically and continuously determined the nitrogen oxides (NOx) concentration in the exhaust gas using the principle of chemiluminescence. In the determination ofNOx , the gas sample is first routed through a converter, where any N02 in the sample is disassociated to form NO. The converted sample is quantitatively converted to N02 by gas phase oxidation with molecular ozone produced within the analyzer. In this reaction, the nitrogen dioxide (N02) molecules are elevated to an electronically excited state, and then immediately reverted to a non-excited ground state. This reversion is accompanied by emission ofphotons, which impinge ana photomultiplier detector, and generate a low level DC current. The current is then amplified and used to drive a front panel meter and a data recorder. The NOx concentration detected by the instrument includes the contributions ofboth the NO inthe sample and the NO resulting from the dissociation ofthe N02 in the sample. The NOx analyzer was operated on an operating range of2000 ppm NOx with a high calibration standard of 1013 ppm NOx. Carbon Monoxide. A Thermo Environmental Model 48 Oas Filter Correlation (OFC) analyzer was used to continuously sample the carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations in the gas stream. GFC spectroscopy is based on the comparison of the infrared (IR) absorption spectrum of the measured gas to that ofothergases in the samplebeing analyzed. This technique is implemented by using a high concentration sample ofthe measured gas (i.e., CO) as a filter for the infrared radiation transmitted through the analyzer. Radiation from an IR source is chopped and passed through a gas filter alternating between CO and N2 due to rotation of the filter wheel. The radiation then passes through an interference filter and onto an absorption cell. The IR radiation then exits the sample cell and falls onto an IR detector.
The CO gas filter produces a reference beam that cannot be further attenuated by CO in the sample cell. The N2 side ofthe filter wheel is transparent to the IR radiation and thus produces a measure beam that is partially absorbed by CO in the celL The chopped detector signal is modulated by the alternation between the two gas filters with an amplitude related to the concentration of CO in the sample cell. Other gases, which absorb thereference and measure beams equally, do not cause modulation of the detector signal leaving the GFC responding specifically to CO.

4-4( 

### Section 4 Sampling andAnalyticalProcedures



### The CO analyzer was operated at an operating range of 10,000 ppm CO with a high calibration standard of8875 ppm CO.
Data Acquisition System. The DAS is a PC-based system with hard disk storage and an external
. 8-channel analog-to-digital converter. In addition to providing an instantaneous display ofanalyzer responses, the DAS compiles·and averages the analyzer data collected once each second and documents analyzer calibrations. Data for the test period were averaged and corrected for calibration error and drift using the DAS software and a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet program. 4.5.3 Calibration and Results
, 

### The gas analyzers were calibrated before use with an internal (direct-to-instrument) calibration to check analyzer linearity. Before each run, an external (through-the-entire-system) calibration was performed to check system bias at the zero and span points. Calibrations at the conclusion· of each run consisted of external system bias checks. The reported results for each parameter were corrected usingthe bias and 

### drift check results and the equations in EPA Method 7E. These calculations were performed bythe DAS software.

4-5( I 

### SECTIONS QAlQC PROCEDURES AND RESULTS 5.1 GENERAL The objective of a QAlQCprogram is to assure that the precision and accuracy of all data generated is scientifically sound and documented to be !lin controL I! 

### To accomplish this, standardized methods or procedures were used. They mustbe validated for their intended use, rigorously followed, and data reported with quality indicators (precision, accuracy, completeness, representativeness, etc.). As a guide, TRC uses the EPA document Quality Assurance Handbookfor Air Pollution 

### Measurement System, 

### Volume III (EPA-600/4-77-027b). TRC's QAlQC 

### plan has incorporated certain considerations to the production ofquality data in all ofits sampling work regardless of the scope and purpose ofthe testing. These considerations include:

• Planning the testing program; • Usingreliable andwell.;.maintained equipment; • Using appropriate forms for recording sampling data; • Establishing a sample coding system to ensure proper chain of custody (i.e., sample identification, laboratory tracing and storage, analysis and reporting); • Using calibration and audit gases traceable to the National mstitute of Standards and Technology (NIST); • Controlling errors by checking data inputs and performingredundant calculations; • Adhering to established protocol.


### 5.2 BAROMETER Barometric pressure values for the testing period were recorded from a digital barometer on-site. The barometer is periodically checked by comparison to a mercury barometer located in the TRC Field Office in Raleigh, NC. The field barometer reading was corrected for the elevation difference between the barometer location and the test port elevation, ifnecessary.



### 5-1I 

### 5.3 PITOTTUBES 

## Section 5 QAIQCProcedures andResults

Each Pitot tube used in sampling either met the design specifications for Type S 

### Pitot tubes in EPA Method 2 and was assigned a baseline coefficient (Cp) 

### of 0.84 or a specific Cp 

### was determined by a wind tunnel calibration. All pitot tubes were visually inspected at the completion ofthe test toinsure structural integrity. 5.4 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE INDICATORS Calibration was not required for inclined or inclined-vertical gauge-oil**mano~eters.** 

### 5.5 THERMOCOUPLESAND DIGITAL INDICATORS Thermocouples were originally calibrated by comparing them against an ASTM-3F mercury-inglass thermometer at approximately 32°F (ice water), ambient temperature and approximately 2120P (boiling water). Each thermocouple was calibrated against temperature ranges to which 

### it was to be typically.exposed during test conditions, and they must agree within 1.5 percent (expressed in**~)** 

### ofthe reference thermometer throughout the entire calibration range. A post calibration was performed in accordance with EPA AL T-011 using a single point calibration against an ASTM mercury-in-glass thermometer in addition to a continuity check of the thermocouple. The continuity check involved verifying that the thermocouple read-out trended in the appropriate direction when exposed to a temperature change. The calibration check is included in Appendix B. Digital indicators were checked by introducing a series ofmillivolt signal strengths to the input and comparing the indicator reading with the actual signal strength. Acceptable calibration error does not exceed 0.5 percent when temperatures are expressed in OR. 5.6 CALIBRATION METERAND METERING SYSTEM The calibration description for the dry gas metering system using critical orifices in lieu ofthe wet test meter is given in Section 16.2 

### ofEPA Method 5. A leak check ofthe metering system before calibration was performed as per Figure 5.2 of EPA Method 5. The metering system's pump is operated for 5 minutes using the smallest orifice to heat up the pump and system to stabilize the meter inlet and outlet temperatures. Values for the orifice meter setting (delta H),

5-2

## Section 5 QAIQCProcedures andResults

( <. 

### corresponding dry test meter volume (V

### d), 

### dry test meter inlet and outlet gas temperatures (!:<ti 

### and ldn), 

### and time were recorded for the initial calibration. The ratio ofthe critical orifice volume to the dry test meter volume (y 

### or gamma) and the orificepressure differential that equates to 0.75 cfin at.standard conditions (delta H@) were then calculated.

I

... 

### 5.7 POST-TEST METER CALIBRATION CHECK
Posttest meter calibrations to determine the y 

### (or Yqa) were conducted on the dry gas to check their accuracy against the original pretest calibration. This posttest calibration was made using the alternative procedure defined by EPA as ALT-009. This procedure is performed on-site using the data collected for each ofthe test runs. It

### is preferred by EPA because it eliminates the questions about possible meter damage during transport after 

### the emission test and, because the calibration data is available 

### inthe field immediately following the test, it eliminates the costly travel, remobilization, and scheduling of a retest should the meter fail the posttest calibration. Additionally, the metering system passed the leak check procedure defined in Method 5 Item 5.6. A complete copy of EPA ALT-009 is available from EPA from the EMC website at http://www.epa.govlttnlemcl. 

### 5.8 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM QAlQC The CEMS was calibrated in accordance with the specific test methods referenced in Section 4. The system response time was determined to be less than 2 minutes. In general, the QAlQC 

### measures included the use of Protocol I calibration gases, pre- and post-test run calibrations, calibration error and bias tests. Copies ofthe certifications for the Protocol 1 gas standards are included in Appendix B-3. Copies ofthe CEMS system bias check and calibration error test are included with the field data in Appendix A-2. Copies ofeach test post-run bias check, along with the corrected test run averages, are included with each individual run in those appendices. 

### 5.9 DATA REDUCTION AND VALIDATION The data collected in the field were recorded on standardized data sheets. The Field Team Leader reviewed the collected data in the field and made note of any discrepancies orerrors. TRC Project Manager or QC Coordinator validated the field data based on the test protocol and the standard operating procedures for each method. They also checked the calculation 

# C
.. < 

### spreadsheets for correct data entry and calculation equations.


### 5-3

## 1. 

# 2. APPENDIX A

, , . ,

'- 

## FIELD))ATA 'Meth9 

# dl;.4,Vata



# . Raw CEMJ)ata\



# C \ 1. AffENDIXA FIELD DATA

### METHOD 1 .. TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS 

# TRC

Plant Name MARTA Boulevard Facility City/State Atlanta, Georgia Test Location Enolne Exhaust Stacks 1, 2 & 3 Personnel 

### I Date KL&MB 4128109 Stack I Ports Type or Stack X Rectangle No. of Ports AvalJable 2 No. of Ports Used 2 Port Inside Diameter, In 2 in

Put dIagram oftest location(s) on back ofthls sheet

Distance to Flow D

T.stPort Environmental Corporation Ifmore than 8and 2diameters Sitduct diameter Is less than 24", use 8or 9points
DIAMETERS Velocity UP DOWN Particulate 8 2
7 1.8 6 1.5 5 1.3
240'25 2 0.5

DOWNSTREAM DIAMETERS AND USE THE HIGHER NUMBER OF POINTS. Equivalent Diameter (for rectangular ducts):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 De 

### = 2 * Depth *Width I (Depth + Width) .----1 

### =2*( )*( )/( )+( )= 

### I
LOCA TlON OF POINTS IN CIRCULAR STACKS OR DUCTS

(Ffadion ofSlack diametertom inside WIIIillo \revet'll. point) 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 .146 .067 .044 .032 .026 .021 .018 .016 .014 .013 .854 .250 .146 .105 .082 .067 .057 .049 .044 .039 .750 .296 .194 .146 .118 .099 .085 .075 .067 .933 .704 .323 .226 .177 .146 .125 .109 .097 .854 .877 .342 .250 .201 .169 .146 .129 .956 .806 .658 .356 .269 .220 .188 .165 .895 .774 .644 .366 .283 .236 .204 .968 .854 .750 .834 .375 .296 .250 .918 .823 .731 .625 .382 .306 .974 .882 .799 .717 .818 .388 .933 .854 .780 .704 .612 .979 .901 .831 .784 .694 .943 .875 .812 .750 .982 .915 .854 .796 For 22 or 24 test points. .951 .891 .835 aee Method 1table In CFR .984 .925 .871 .956 .903 .986 .933 .961 .987 LOCATlON OFPOINTS INRECTANGULAR STACKSOR DUCTS

(Fl'llctlOI1 ofstack diametertom I Id w 1110 IrS I'll polnl) n. e 

## • vo • 2 

# " 4**~** Ii I II 1:1 10 11 12 .250 .167 .125 .100 .063 .071 .063 .058 .050 .045 .042 .750 .500 .375 .300 .250 .214 .188 .167 .150 .136 .125 .833 .825 .500 .417 .357 .313 .278 .250 .227 .208 .875 .700 .583 .500 .438 .389 .350 .318 .292 .900 .750 .643 .563 .500 .450 .409 .375 .917 .786 .688 .611 .550 .500 .458 .929 .813 .722 .850 .591 .542 .938 .833 .750 .882 .625 .944 .850.773 .708 .950 .864 .792 .955 .875 .958

## ~~**lo~..v** (print)2

6

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

M2-M4 Data.xls 

## VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION Company & Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facility Test Location: Engine No.2 (Engine at Idle) Operator: Ken Loder I Matt Brooks

Test Delta P Point (in H2O)

A-1 0.04

2 0.04 3 0.07 4 0.07 5 0.07 6 0.06 7 0.06 8 0.035 B-1 0.085

2 0.08 3 0.085 4 0.08 5 0.08 6 0.075 7 0.08 8 0.08

Default WallAdj. Faotor IUsed X INot Used

Standard CondiUons:

68 deg F 29.92 in Hg Temp. 

### .LEl 387 A 387 Pbar 387 Pg 387 Cp 387 %02 387 %C02 387 %N2 387 ts 394 sqrtdp 420 dp 383 397 400 OGMSampling 390 Wel·Dry Bulb 392 390 Theta y 

### tm Vm Vic dH

Vmstd Vwstd %H20 %H20Sat Mfd Md Ms Fa Ps vs vs
Qsd QsdH Qsw QswH QswH (WAF) Qaw Run Number: Date: Start Time: Stop Time: TEST DATA Parameter Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. Barometric Pressure: Source Gas Static Pressure: Pitot Tube Coefficient: Oxygen, by vol. dry: Carbon Dioxide, by vol. dry: Nitrogen, by vol. dry: Avg Source Gas Temperature: Avg Square Root Delta p: Average Velocity Head For 16 pts:

(Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) Method 4 Run 10: Run Start-Stop Times: Override Moisture: Net Run Time: Dry Gas Meter Cal. Factor: Dry Gas Meter Temperature: Volume of Metered Gas Sample: Tot. Vol. of Liquid Collected: Avg Meter Press. Differential:

RESULTS TABULATION Volume of Metered Gas Sample Volume of Water Vapor Moisture Content, byvolume Moisture @ Saturated Condo Dry Mole Fraction Source Gas MolecularWt., Dry Source Gas Molecularwt., Wet Fuel Factor Absolute Flue Gas Pressure Source Gas Velocity Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF) Volumetric Air Flow Rates

Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Dry Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry Standard Cubic FeetIMin., Wet Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet (WAF) Actual Cubic Feet/Min., Wet *" Value used in calculations U2-1-M2-1 4128109

18:26 18:56

U2-1-M2-1**-50~27** SQ. In. 30.28 In. Hg

0.00 In. H20 0.84 0.10 %02 10.80 %C02 89.10 %N2 391.4 OF 0.2589 In. H20 0.0670 In. H20
U2-M4·1 18:26-18:56 na % 30 Minutes 0.9927

89.1 OF 22.962 ACF

117.2 grams 2 In. H2O

22.290 OSCF'

5.517 sCP 19.84 'Yo" 100.0 'Y. 0.8016

29.73 Ib/lll-mole 27.40 IbIIll-mole

1.93 30.28 In.Hg 18.83 fIIsec 18.74 fIIsec

198 SCFMOry 11,905 SCFHOry 248 SCFMWet 14,851 SCFHWel 14,777 SCFHWel (" 394 ACFM 

## \

..

### VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION Company &Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facility Run Number: U3-1·M2·1 ( Test Location: Engine No.3 (Engine at Idle) \ Date: 4128109 Operator: Ken Loder I Matt Brooks Start Time: 20:12 Stop Time: 20:42 TEST DATA Test Delta P Temp. 

### E2i!l! (in 1:!2Ql 

### W Parameter U3

...·M2·1 A·1 0.04 370 A Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. -5ir2'7 sq. in.

2 0.045 370 Pbar Barometric Pressure: 30.28 in.Hg 3 0.055 365 Pg Source Gas Static Pressure: -0.22 in. H2O 4 0.04 365 Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient: 0.84 5 0.045 368 %02 Oxygen, by vol. dry: 0.30 %02 6 0.05 368 %C02 Carbon Dioxide. by vol. dry: 11.30 % C02 3 0.055 369 %N2 Nitrogen. by vol. dry: 88.40 %N2 8 0.05 362 ts Avg Source Gas Temperature: 360.8 'F B-1 0.065 355 sqrtdp Avg Square Root Delta p: 0.2277 In. H2O 10 2 0.07 356 dp Average Velocity Head For 16 pIs: 0.0519 In. H2O 11 3 0.0'/5 352 (Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) 1: 4 0.065 355 13 5 0.055 355 DGMSampling Method 4 Run 10: U3·M4·1 14 6 0.05 357 Wet·Dry Bulb Run Start-Stop TImes: 2012-2042 15 7 ri.ri65 354 Override Moisture: NA% 16 8 0.02 352 Theta Net Run Time: 30 Minutes 11 y Dry Gas MeterCal. Factor. 0.9927 18 tm Dry Gas MeterTemperature: 91.2 OF 19 Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample: 21.79 ACF 20 Vic Tot. Vol. of Liquid Collected: 107.4 grams 2' dH Avg Meter Press. Differential: 2 In. H2O 22 23 24 25 RESULTS TABULATION Vmstd Volume of Metered Gas Sample 21.072 DSCF' Vwstd Volume ofWater Vapor 5.055 SCF' %H20 Moisture Content. byvolume 19.35 %" %H20Sat Moisture @ Saturated Condo 100.0 % Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.8065 Md Source Gas Molecular WI., Dry 29.82 IbIIlHnole Ms Source Gas MolecularWt., Wet 27.53 lbIIb-mole Default WaHAdj. Factor Fa Fuel Factor 1.82 IUsed Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure 30.26 In. Hg X INOlUSed vs Source Gas Velocity 16.23 flfsec vs Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF) 16.15 flfsec Volumetric Air Flow Rates Standard Condflions: Qsd Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Dry 178 SCFMDry

68 degF QsdH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry 10,702 SCFHDry 29.92 In Hg Qsw Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Wet 221 SCFMWet QswH Standard Cubic FeetJHour, Wet 13,270 SCFHWel

# (,.~.-. QswH (WAF) Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet (WAF) 13,204 SCFHWel Qaw Actual Cubic FeeVMln.• Wet 340 ACFM ** Value used In calculations

M2.M4 Oala,xis

## VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION Company &Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facility Run Number: U1-I-M2-1 Test Location: Engine NO.1 (Engine at Idle) Date: 4128109 Operator: Ken Loder I Matt Brooks Start Tlme: 21:05 Stop Time: 21:45 TEST DATA Test Delta P Temp. Point (In H2O) 

### L..fl Parameter U1-1·M2·1

A-1 0.09 379 A Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. -5"0.27 sq. in.

2 0.095 385 Pbar Barometric Pressure: 30.28 in.Hg 3 0.095 385 Pg Source Gas Static Pressure: -0.22 in. H20 4 0.07 387 Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient: 0.64 5 0.055 372 %02 Oxygen. by vol. dry. 6.40 %02 II 

### 6 0.065 362 %C02 Carbon Dioxide, by vol. dry: 8.00 % C02 

### 3 0.065 370 %N2 Nitrogen, by vol. dry: 85.60 %N2 8 0.06 375 ts Avg Source Gas Temperature: 378.4 OF 9 B-1 0.075 375 sqrtdp Avg Square Root Delta p: 0.2603 In. H2O 10 2 0.085 375 dp Average Velocity Head For 16 pts: 0.0677 In. H2O 11 3 0.075 380 (Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) 12 

### 4 0.07 382 13**~** 0.06 382 DaM Sampling Method 4 Run 10: U1·M4·1 14 6 0.035 382 WeI-Dry Bulb Run Start-8top Times: 2105-2145 15 7 0.055 382 Override Moisture: na % 16 

### 8 0.05 382 Theta Net Run Time: 30 Minutes IT y Dry Gas Meter Cal. Factor: 0.9927 18 tm Dry Gas MeterTemperature: 90.3 OF 19 Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample: 22.402 ACF 20 Vic Tot. Vol. ofUquid Collected: 82.3 grams 21 dH Avg Meter Press. Differential: 2 In. H20 22 23 24 25 RESULTS TABULATION Vmstd Volume of Metered Gas Sample 21.699 DSCP Vwstd Volume ofWater Vapor 3.874 SCF' %H20 Moisture Content, by volume 15.15 % 0' %H20Sat Moisture @ Saturated Condo 100.0 % Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.8465 Md Source Gas Molecular Wt.. Dry 29.54 Ibllb-mole Ms Source Gas MolecularWt.. Wet 27.79 Ibllb-mole Default WallAdj. Factor Fo Fuel Factor 1.61 IUsed Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure 30.26 In.Hg X INot Used vs Source Gas Velocity 18.66 ftlsec 

### vs Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF) 18.57 ftlsec Volumetric Air Flow Rates Standard Conditions: Qsd Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Dry 211 SCFMOry

68 deg F QsdH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry 12,675 SCFHOry 29.92 In Hg Qsw Standard Cubic Feet/Min.• Wet 249 SCFMWet QswH Standard CubiC FeetIHour. Wet 14,938 SCFHWet QswH(WAF) Standard Cubic FeeVHour. Wet fNAF) 14,864 SCFHWet 

# (,

...,' Qaw Actual Cubic FeetlMin., Wet 391 ACFM
•• Value used In calculations

M2-M4 Oata.xIs10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

## ~ ..

M2-M4 Data.xls 

## VOLUMETRIC FLOW 

## RATE DETERMINATION Company & Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facillty Test Location: Engine No.1 (Engine at Maximum Load) Operator: Ken Loder I Matt Brooks Run Number: Date: Start Time: U1·M·M2·1 4128/09 23:04 Stop Time: 23:15 Test Delta P pOint [in HgQ} A-1 0.33

2 0.33 3 0.36 4 0.34 5 0.34 6 0.34 3 0.37 8 0.36 B·1 0.36

2 0.38 0.34 4 0.31 5 0.26 6 0.2 0.23 8 0.28

Default WaifAdj. Factor 

## I Used X INotUsed

Standard Conditions:

68 deg F 29.92 in Hg Temp. 

### .L..El 654 650 646 641 632 622 601 598 590 590 590 622 613 605 610 610 TEST DATA parameter A Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. Pbar Barometric Pressure: Pg Source Gas Static Pressure: Cp Pltot Tube Coefficient: %02 Oxygen. by vol. dry. %C02 Carbon Dioxide. by vol. dry: %N2 Nitrogen, by vol. dry. 

### ts Avg Source Gas Temperature: sqrtdp Avg Square Root Detta p: dp Average Velocity Head For 16 pts: (Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) OGM Sampling Method 4 Run 10: Wet.ory Bulb Run Start-Stop Times: Override Moisture: Theta Net Run Time: y Dry Gas Meter Cal. Factor: tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature: Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample: Vic Tot. VoLof Liquid Collected: dH Avg Meter Press. Differential:

RESULTS TABULATION Vmstd Volume ofMetered Gas Sample Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor %H20 Moisture Content. by volume %H20Sat Moisture @ Saturated Condo Mfd Dry Mole Fraction Md Source Gas MolecularWt.. Dry Ms Source Gas MolecularWt.• Wet Fo Fuel Factor Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure vs Source Gas Velocity vs Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF)**~lum!i!lric** Air Flow Rates Qsd Standard Cubic Feet/Min•• Dry QsdH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry

. Qsw Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Wet QswH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet QswH r;NAF) Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet foNAF) Qaw Actual Cubic Feet/Min.• Wet

.... Value used in calculations U1-M-M2·1 50.27 sq. In.

30.28 In.Hg -0.12 In. H20 0.84 0.10 %02 11.20 %C02 88.70 %N2 617.1 OF 0.5643 In. H2O 0.3184 In. H20
U1·M-M4·1 2225·2255 na % 30 Minutes 0.9927

85.3 OF 22.634 ACF

112.8 grams 2 In. H2O

22.125 OSCF'

5.309 SCF' 19.35 %

.. 100.0 % 0.8065

29.80 tb/lb-mole 27.51 tb/lb.mole

1.86 30.27 In.Hg 46.08 ftlaee 45.85 ftlsee

386 SCFMOry 23,162 SCFHOry 479 SCFMWel 28,720 SCfHWet 28.577 SCFH Wet 965 ACFM

## VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATION Company &Plant: Marta Perry Boulevard Facility Run Number: U3·M-M2·1 Test Location: Engine No.3 (Engine at Maximum Load) Date: 04129109 ( " Operator. Ken Loder I Matt Brooks Start Time: 00:05 Stop Time: 00:44 TEST DATA Test Delta P Temp. Point (in H2O) 

### C£l Parameter U3-M·M2-1

A-1 0.49 605 A Stack/Duct Area: .3 sq. ft. 50.265 sq. In. .2 

### 2 0.48 605 Pbar Barometric Pressure: 30.28 In. Hg 

### 3 0.48 608 Pg Source Gas Static Pressure: -0.12 In. H2O 

### 4 0.47 609 Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient: 0.84 • 5 5 0.45 609 %02 Oxygen, by vol. dry. 0.00 %02 6 0.46 605 %C02 Carbon Dioxide, by vol. dry. 11.60 %C02 7 0.46 605 %N2 Nitrogen. by vo!. dry: 88.40 %N2 8 0.45 600 ts Avg Source Gas Temperature: 600.3 'F B-1 0.44 598 sqrtdp Avg Square Root Delta p: 0.6609 In. H2O 10 2 0.47 597 dp Average Velocity Head For 16 pts: 0.4368 In. H20 II 3 0.47 597 (Squared Avg. Sq.Root Delta p) 12 4 0.45 595 13 5 0.36 595 DGMSampUng Method 4 Run ID: U3-M·M4-1 14 

### 6 0.37 579 Wet-Dry Bulb Run Start-Stop Times: 0005-0044 15 7 0.36 598 Override Moisture:**na~%** 18 0.35 599 Theta Net RUn Time: 30 Minutes 17 y Dry Gas Meter Cal. Factor: 0.9927 18 tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature: 81 OF 19 Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample: 22.799 ACF 20 Vic Tot. Vol. of Liquid Collected: 111.3 grams 21 dH Avg Meter Press. Differential: 2 In. H20 22 23 24 25 RESULTS TABULATION Vmstd Volume of Metered Gas Sample 22.463 DSCF' Vwstd Volume of Water Vapor 5.239 SCF' %H20 Moisture Content, by volume 18.91 %

.. %H20Sat Moisture @ Saturated Condo 100.0 % Mfd Dry Mole Fraction 0.8109 Md Source Gas MolecularWI., Dry 29.86 IbIIb·mole Ms Source Gas MolecularWt., Wet 27.61 Ibllb-moIe Default WallAdj. Factor Fo Fuel Factor 1.80 IUsed Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure 30.27 in. Hg X INotUSed vs Source Gas Velocity 53.45 ftlsec vs Source Gas Velocity (0.995 WAF) 53.18 ftlsec Volumetric Air Flow Rates Standard Conditions: Qsd Standard CubiC Feet/Min., Dry 457 SCFMDry 68 deg F OsdH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Dry 27,442 SCFHDry 29.92 In Hg Osw Standard Cubic Feet/Min., Wet 564 SCFMWet QswH Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet 33,843 SCFHWet**OswH~AF)** Standard Cubic Feet/Hour, Wet**~AF)** 33,673 SCFH Wet 

# ( Oaw Actual Cubic FeetiMin., Wet 1,119 ACFM
•• Value used In calculations

M2-M4 Data.xls

### METHOD 

### '2/4· VELOCITY 

### 1MOISTURE FIELD DATA 

# TRC
Environmental Corporation 

### U..l -M4-:L

Della Pavgis square ofthe average ofthe Individualsquarerools

Checked By:**--W~!!...--------** (sign)**_.,...J.;K!£e!..!.lnnJ.Se!1!.thL!l=l.!o~dear**____ -..., ____ ---, (print)

RAL-M2-4.XLS

### METHOD 2 

## 14•VELOCITY 

## I MOISTURE FIELD DATA 

# TRC

'\ \.'L 

# 1 'l..O 

# IGas Parameters



# c .. Checked By:**--I,f-V!~"""---------** (sign)**_---!,:K~e!..!!nn.!.\ie:.u.thU:L~o~de:<!.r**__________(print)

RAL-M2-4.xLS

### METHOD 214 .. VELOCITY 

### I MOISTURE FIELD DATA 

# TRC
Environmental Corporation

Deffa Pavg is square ofthe average ofthe indiVidualsquare roots

Checked By: -fJ1Yr-IF--------- (sign)**_.......J.;K).><e.!.llnn....,.e"""thwL~o:l:!;de"-l.r** ____ -'--

_____(print)

RAL·M2·4.XLS

### METHOD 2/4 • 

### VELOCITY I 

### MOISTURE FIELD DATA 

# TRC
Environmental Corporation

Checked By:**--lI~\---''-:-------** (sign)**_--LK:lSie~nnwse2.!!th..wL!;:!,o~dCS<!er,--** __________ ·(print)**~-""**....r or QA Manager}

.

RAl-M2-4.XlS

# ~**\.~\.o** ...

# ~O\·.

( CYCLONIC FLOW DETERMINATION DATA SHEET (WITH PRELIMINARY VELOCITY AND MOISTURE) MARTA

Cubic Feet 

# TRC'
Environmental Corporation

"'-

__ &....

______ :""'1

___ .L...
__ ....

1Gas Parameters

Balance No.

___ _ Total Catch 

## "-----

# ......

Delta P avgIs square ofth9 aV9rage ofthe individualsquar9 roots

Checked By:**-+~hII't:...--'------_** (sign)
__**,.!.lKlaen~n~et"-.!.h.=:Lod~e!...r**_____(p,rint)

RAL·M2CYC-4.XLS

### CYCLONIC FLOW DETERMINATION DATA SHEET (WITH PRELIMINARY VELOCITY AND MOISTURE) 

# TRC
Environmental Corporation

Delta P avg Is square ofthe average ofthe individual square roots S ABS(Yaw) :5 20° Checked By: --f-t---¥-7'Io."'------- (sign) __ -'-'K.!<:en""'n""'eto!,!.h.=;Lo""d=er'--

____(print)

RAL-M2CYC-4.XLS

# APPENDIX A FIELD DATA· '2. 

# 'Raw CEM**D~ta**

# ('

(

\! I. Calibration Error Test at Run 1 . STRATA Version 2.0 02 C02 CO NOx % % ppm ppm 4/28/2009 16:29:20 1.054 2.462 1647.3 4/28/2009 17:47:20 21.014 0.178 10.1 4/28/2009 17:48:21 21.039 0.182 6.31 4/28/2009 17:49:22 15.779 2.917 6.5 Calibration Error Test at Run 1 Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No.2 Reference Cylinder Numbers Zero Low-range Mid-range High-range 02 XC016125 CC112179 CC117038 CO2 XC016125 CC112179 CC117038 CO CC112179 CC61468 XC016125 CC18971 NOx XC016125 SG9120995 ALM00412 SG9132445 DatefTime 4/28/2009 17:52:09 PASSED Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx Units % % ppm ppm Zero Ref Cyl 0 0 0 0 Zero Avg 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 Zero Error% 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 Low RefCyl 2303 240.9 Low Avg 2228.8 245.2 Low Error% 0.8 0.4

. Mid Ref Cyl 9.64 9.03 4570 495 Mid Avg 9.746 9.152 4529.3 495.1 Mid Error% 0.4 0.6 0.5 0 High RefCyl 23.95 18.93 8875 1013 High Avg 24.065 18.752 8891.6 1008 High Error% 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.5 382.7 54.5 54.91N02 Converter Check

55 (55.2ppm N02 gas)Initial System Bias Operator: Check, Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0 Ken Loder Plant Name: Location: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Unit No. 2 Reference Zero 02 XC016125 C02 XC016125 CO CC112179 NOx XC016125 Cylinder Numbers Span CC1l2179 CC1l2179 XC016125 SG9120995 Date/Time 04-28-2009 18:16:10 Analyte 02 CO2 CO Units % % ppm Zero Ref Cyl 0.000 0.000 0.0 Zero Cal 0.029 0.030 5.6 Zero Avg 0.185 0.148 14.3 Zero Bia$% 0.7% 0.6% 0.1% Zero Drift% Span Ref Cyl 9.641 9.031 4570.0 NOx ppm 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.1% 240.9 Span 

## cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 245.2 Span Avg 9.604 9.012 4392.8 234.2 Span Bias% 0.6% 0.7% 1.5% 1.1% Span Drift% System Bias Check End

Page 1 PASSEDTest Run 2 STRATA Version 2.0 02 CO2 CO NOx

% % ppm ppm Begin calculating run averages 04-28-2009 18:38:10 0.184 10.801 9599,.2 499.2 04-28-2009 18:39:11 0.184 10.792 9795.6 492.9 

## ( 04-28-2009 18:40:10 0.183 10.797 9434.7 497.8 04-28-2009 18:41:11 0.183 10.779 9804.2 501.9 

# 41.-:c 04-28-2009 18:42:10 0.184 10.768 9792.3' 499.5 04-28-2009 18:43:11 0.183 10.759 9980.3' 495.6 04-28-2009 18:44:10 0.184 10.753 9848.9' 500.9 04-28-2009 18:45:10 0.184 10.740 9980.9' 504.5 04-28-2009 18:46:10 0.183 10.742 9985.4' 505.2 04-28-2009 18:47:10 0.183 10.721 10007.9' 493.5 04-28-2009 18:48:11 0.183 10.739 9999.4' 493.5 04-28-2009 18:49:10 0.182 10.727 10008.2 497.8 04-28-2009 18:50:11 0.177 10.724 10006.5 491.2 04-28-2009 18:51:10 0.173 10.719 10000.1 488.2 04-28-2009 18:52:11 0.175 10.722 10000.1 486.7 04-28-2009 18:53:10 0.180 10.715 9990.9 479.1 04-28-2009 18:54:10 0.176 10.714 10010.3 485.7 04-28-2009 18:55:10 0.181 10.714 10010.7 498.6 04-28-2009 18:56:10 0.179 10.715 10011.1 491.7 04-28-2009 18:57:11 0.180 10.701 10011.3 492.7 04-28-2009 18:58:10 0.182 10.700 10011.8 488.1 04-28-2009 18:59:11 0.183 10.703 10012.0 494.0 04-28-2009 19:00:10 0.177 10.683 10011.3 498.5 04-28-2009 19:01:11 0.183 10.695 10012.7' 486.6 04-28-2009 19:02:10 0.182 10.702 10013.0' 482.2 04-28-2009 19:03:11 0.179 10.702 10013.5: 491. 0 04-28-2009 19:04:10 0.180 10.966 8006.6' 484.9 04-28-2009 19:05:11 0.179 10.812 8612.8 478.6 04-28-2009 19:06:10 0.180 10.708 10000.6 478.0 04-28-2009 19:07:11 0.180 10.694 9947.5 484.8 Run Averages 02 CO2 CO NOx % % ppm ppm 04-28-2009 19:07:11 0.181 10.740 9831.1: 492 .1**~** Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No. 2 Test**Ru~** 2 End

Page 1Final System Bias Check for Run 2. STRATA Version 2.0 Operator: Ken Loder 

## (

, Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No.2 Run 10: U2-1 Reference Cylinder Numbers Zero Span 02 XC016125 CC112179 CO2 XC016125 CC112179 CO CC112179 XC016125 NOx XC016125 SG9120995 Daterrime 4/28/2009 19:22:11 PASSED Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx Units % % ppm ppm Zero Ref Cyl 0 0 0 0 Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 ZeroAvg -0.013 0.257 17.4 24.4 Zero Bias% 0.2 1.2 0.1 2.4 Zero Drift% -0.8 0.6 0 2.4 Span RefCyl 9.641 9.031 4570 240.9 Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 245.2 SpanAvg 9.618 9.071 4413.9 238.6 Span Bias% 0.5 0.4 1.3 0.7 Span Orift% 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 Ini ZeroAvg 0.185 0.148 14.3 0.6 Ini Span Avg 9.604 9.012 4392.8 234.2 Run Avg 0.181 10.74 9831.1 492.1 Co 0.086 0.202 15.9 12.5 Cm 9.611 9.041 4403.3 236.4 CorrectAvg 0.096 10.767 10223.5 516Initial System Bias Check for Run 3. STRATA Version 2.0 

## ( Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility

. Location: Unit No.3

Run ID: 

### U3-1 Reference Cylinder Numbers Zero Span 02 XC016125 CC112179 CO2 XC016125 CC112179 CO CC112179 XC016125 NOx XC016125 SG9132445 DatelTime 

### 4/28/2009 20:03:10 PASSED 

### AnaIyte 02 CO2 CO NOx Units 

### % % ppm ppm Zero Ref Cyl 0 0 0 0 Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 ZeroAvg 0.153 0.091 4.1 6.1 Zero Bias% 0.5 0.3 0 0.6 Zero Drift% Span RefCyI 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 Span Cal 9.746 9,152 4529.3 1008 Span Avg 9.582 8.798 4383.8 1006.8 Span Bias% 0.7 1.9 1.6 -0.1 Span Drift%Test Run 3 STRATA Version 2.0 02 CO2 CO NOx

% % ppm ppm Begin calculating run averages <"i"""'" 04-28-2009 20:08:01 0.555 11.019 64.2 3010.0 

# Ov3-J04-28-2009 20:09:01 0.556 11.018 64.2 3029.8 04-28-2009 20:10:01 0.565 11.014 61.0 3054.9 04-28-2009 20:11:01 0.565 11.015 56.4 3069.7 04-28-2009 20:12:01 0.563 11.015 63.4 3057.8 04-28-2009 20:13:01 0.559 11.033 60,9 3062.0 04-28-2009 20:14:00 0.578 11.048 59.4 3059.8 04-28-2009 20:15:01 0.588 11.038 54.4 3108.9 04-28-2009 20:16:00 0.575 11.036 54.3 3106.3 04-28-2009 20:17:01 0.603 11.014 52.1 3098.1 04-28-2009 20:18:01 0.619 11.012 44.5 3151.5 04-28-2009 20:19:01 0.612 11.017 44.6 3158.8 04-28-2009 20:20:01 0.607 11.024 44.5 3152.7 04-28-2009**20:2~:01** 0.611 11.014 44.5 3149.7 04-28-2009 20:22:01 0.390 11.147 221.2 2899.0 04-28-2009 20:23:01 0.176 11.124 1647.9 653.3 04-28-2009 20:24:01 0.175 11.078 2503.1 245.1 04-28-2009 20:25:00 0.178 11.056 2826.3 243.5 04-28-2009 20:26:01 0.175 11.032 3099.7 243.5 04-28-2009 20:27:01 0.177 11.034 3043.3 242.2 04-28-2009 20:28:01 0.177 11.032 3051.2 242.8 04-28-2009 20:29:01 0.177 11.035 3003.1 246.1 04-28-2009 20:30:01 0.177 11.025 3114.5 253.4 04-28-2009 20:31:01 0.177 11.033 3082.0 261.2 04-28-2009 20:32:00 0.176 11.043 3168.6 267.4 04-28-2009 20:33:01 0.177 11.035 3240.8 272.0 04-28-2009 20:34:01 0.176 11.036 3198.6 276.5 04-28-2009 20:35:00 0.175 11.031 3157.9 281.7 04-28-2009 20:36:01 0.176 11.021 3145.2 285.0 04-28-2009 20:37:01 0.175 11.002 3368.5 288.9 Run Averages 02 CO2 CO NOx % % ppm ppm 04-28-2009 20:37:01 0.374 11.036 1518.0 1685.6* Operator: Ken Loder Plant Narne: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No. ] '{.J./ Test Run 3 End

Page 1

### Final System Bias Check for Run 3. STRATA Version 2.0



### ,. Final System Bias Check for Run 3 ( 

### Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No. 3 Run ID: U3-1 Reference Cylinder Numbers Zero Span 02 XC016125 CC112179 CO2 XC016125 CC112179 CO CC112179 XC016125 NOx XC016125 SG9132445 OatelTime 

### 4/28/2009 20:43:21 PASSED Analyte 02 CO2 ,CO NOx Units % % ppm ppm Zero RefCyI 0 0 0 0 Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 ZeroAvg -0.018 -0.071 4.4 3 Zero Bias% 0.2 0.5 0 0.3 Zero Drift% -0.7 -0.9 0 -0.3 Span RefCyI 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 1008 Span Avg 9.618 8.918 4456.5 1004.3 Span Bias% 0.5 1.2 0.8 -0.4 Span Orift% 0.2 0.6 0.8 -0.2 (' 

### Ini Zero Avg 0.153 0.091 4.1 6.1 Ini SpanAvg 9.582 8.798 4383.8 1006.8 RunAvg 0.374 11.036 1518 1685.6 Co 0.067 0.01 4.3 4.5 Cm 9.6 8.858 4420.2 1005.5 CorrectAvg 0.31 11.255 1566.5 1701.3Test Run 4 STRATA Version 2.0 02 CO2 CO NOx

% % 

### ppm ppm Begin calculating run averages 

# uI
.. I04-28-2009 21:23:09 6.389 7.742 43.9 118.6 04-28-2009 21:24:10 6.417 7.739 43.9 114.2 04-28-2009 21:25:09 6'.419 7.740 43.9 110.5 ( i 04-28-2009 21:26:09 6.412 7.745 43.8 112.5 04-28-2009 21:27:09 6.355 7.786 43.9 103.2 04-28-2009 21:28:09 6.343 7.773 43.8 132.6 04-28-2009 21:29:09 6.375 7.779 43.8 112.3 04-28-2009 21:30:09 6.362 7.787 43.8 111.1 04-28-2009 21:31:09 6.370 7.783 43.8 110.7 04-28-2009 21:32:09 6.352 7.793 43.8 117.5 04-28-2009 21:33:10 6.373 7.779 43.7 118.7 04-28-2009 21:34:09 6.383 7.772 43.8 114.9 04-28-2009 21:35:10 6.397 7.767 43.7 114.5 04-28-2009 21:36:09 6.381 7.772 43.7 106.1 04-28-2009 21:37:09 6.417 7.753 43.6 108.2 04-28-2009 21:38:09 6.338 7.801 43.6 116.3 04-28-2009 21:39:09 6.401 7.763 43.6 111.7 04-28-2009 21:40:09 6.396 7.765 43.5 106.9 04-28-2009 21:41:09 6.387 7.770 43.5 103.1 04-28-2009 21:42:10 6.403 7.761 43.5 108.4 04-28-2009 21:43:09 6.391 7.766 43.5 103.1 04-28-2009 21:44:10 6.334 7.809 43.4 103.2 04-28-2009 21:45:09 6.217 7.863 43.3 140.0 04-28-2009 21:46:09 6.228 7.849 43.4 143.6 04-28-2009 21:47:09 6.385 7.750 43.3 133.6 04-28-2009 21:48:09 6.394 7.752 43.3 100.6 04-28-2009 21:49:09 6.402 7.749 43.2 105.5 04-28-2009 21:50:09 6.411 7.733 43.2 101.7 04-28-2009 21:51:10 6.338 7.786 43.2 100.7 04-28-2009 21:52:09 6.250 7.812 43.2 133.9 Run Averages 02 CO2 CO NOx % % 

### ppm ppm 04-28-2009 21:52:09 6.367 7.775 43.6 113.9 Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry**~Vd** Facility Location: Unit No. 1 Test Run 4 End



# c. Page 1Final System Bias Check for Run 4. STRATA Version 2.0 Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility location: Unit No. 1

. RunlD: U1-1 Reference Cylinder Numbers Zero Span 02 XC016125 CC112179 CO2 XC016125 CC112179 CO CC112179 XC016125 NOx XC016125 SG9132445 DatelTime 

### 4/26/2009 21 :57:26 PASSED Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx**Uni~s** 

### % % ppm ppm Zero Ref Cyl 0 0 0 0 Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 Zero Avg 0.113 -0.072 3.5 1.9 Zero Bias% 0.4 0.5 0 0.2 Zero Drift% 0.5 0 

### 0 -0.1 Span Ref Cyl 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 1006 Span Avg 9.52 8.731 4363.3 1002.9 Span Bias% 0.9 2.2 1.9 -0.5 Span Drift% -0.4 -1

. -1 -0.1

I 

### l IniZeroAvg -0.016 -0.071 4.4 3 Ini SpanAvg 9.616 8.918 4456.5 1004.3 RunAvg 6.367 7.775 43.6 113.9 Co 0.048 -0.072 4 2.5 Cm 9.569 6.624 4409.9 1003.6 CorrectAvg 6.399 7.965 41.1 112.7

### Test Run 5 Begin. STRATA Version 2.0 Operator: Ken Loder 

### (

, 

### Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility location: Unit No.1

- Initial Max Load test
- RUN ABORTED 02 CO2 CO NOx 

### % % ppm ppm Begin calculating run averages 

# A-'boA.eJ 4/28/2009 

### 22:05:14 3.07 9.57 13.9 3797.9 4/28/2009 

### 22:06:14 3.08 9.57 13.8 3746.0 4/28/2009 

### 22:07:14 3.09 9.57 13.9 3773.3

## ~ 4/28/2009**22~08:14** 

### 3.08 9.58 13.8 3820.7 

# Ltl'yV) 4/28/2009 

### 22:09:14 2.13 10.19 13.8 3913.5 4/28/2009 

### 22:10:14 1.31 10.57 13.8 4198.6 4/28/2009 

### 22:11:13 1.26 10.60 13.7 4223.8 4/28/2009 

### 22:12:14 1.23 10.61 13.7 4229.6 4/28/2009 

### 22:13:13 1.20 10.64 13.6 4245.8 4/28/2009 

### 22:14:14 1.15 10.67 13.6 4247.0 4/28/2009 

### 22:15:14 1.12 10.68 13.6 4218.6 4/28/2009 

### 22:16:14 1.08 10.70 13.6 4233.7 4/28/2009 

### 22:17:14 1.06 10.71 13.6 4218.8 4/28/2009 

### 22:18:14 1.04 10.72 13.5 4214.5 4/28/2009 

### 22:19:14 1.01 10.75 13.5 4217.5 4/28/2009 

### 22:20:13 0.96 10.77 13.4 4191.6 4/28/2009 

### 22:21:14 0.94 10.78 13.5 4179.7 4/28/2009 

### 22:22:13 0.91 10.81 13.4 4163.0 4/28/2009 

### 22:23:14 0.80 10.87 16.3 4123.6 4/28/2009 

### 22:24:13 0.81 10.86 21.8 4053.2 4/28/2009 

### 22:25:14 0.94 10.81 13.3 4101.8 4/28/2009 

### 22:26:14 1.08 10.70 13.4 4162.7 4/28/2009 

### 22:27:14 1.28 10.61 13.3 4236.0 4/28/2009 

### 22:28:14 1.20 10.66 13.3 4311.3 4/28/2009 

### 22:29:13 1.11 10.72 13.4 4290.6 4/28/2009 

### 22:30:14 1.10 10.71 13.3 4236.4 4/28/2009 

### 22:31:13 1.17 10.68 13.4 4266.9 4/28/2009 

### 22:32:14 1.18 10.67 13.3 4272.4 4/28/2009 

### 22:33:14 1.18 10.67 13.4 4290.7 4/28/2009 

### 22:34:14 1.15 10.69 13.3 4295.7 4/28/2009 

### 22:35:14 1.09 10.71 13.3 4284.7 4/28/2009 

### 22:36:14 1.08 10.72 13.4 4262.2 4/28/2009 

### 22:37:14 1.05 10.74 13.4 4254.1 4/28/2009 

### 22:38:13 1.05 10.74 13.5 4258.2 4/28/2009 

### 22:39:14 1.01 10.77 13.4 4257.6 4128/2009 

### 22:40:13 0.96 10.80 13.4 4235.7 4/28/2009 

### 22:41:14 0.93 10.82 13.4 4219.8 4/28/2009 

### 22:42:13 1.81 10.26 13.3 4179.8 4/28/2009 

### 22:43:14 0.30 10.77 5363.3 2762.9 4/28/2009 

### 22:44:14 0.09 10.99 5100.7 379.0 4/28/2009 

### 22:45:14 0.09 11.30 854.9 309.0 4/28/2009 

### 22:46:14 0.09 11.31 102.7 376.7 

# (Test Run 6 STRATA Version 2.0 

### 02 

### CO2 CO MOx

% % 

### ppm ppm Begin calculating run averages 04-28-2009 22:49:03 0.101 11.298 84.7 377.6 04-28-2009 22:50:04 0.100 11.306 99.9 435.6 

# lA\- vV\ 04-28-2009 22:51:03 0.096 11.303 100.1 384.9 04-28-2009 22:52:04 0.096 11.299 105.4 348.9 04-28-2009 22:53:03 0.094 11.309 142.7 331.2 04-28-2009 22:54:04 0.094 11.304 145.1 311. 9 04-28-2009 22:55:03 0.096 11.309 124.1 311.8 04-28-2009 22:56:04 0.093 11.309 133.6 297.1 04-28-2009 22:57:03 0.094 11.307 134.0 289.4 04-28-2009 22:58:03 0.095 11.305 127.1 283.8 04-28-2009 22:59:04 0.095 11.306 133.3 270.3 04-28-2009 23:00:03 0.094 11.304 135.5 256.2 04-28-2009 23:01:04 0.096 11.304 140.2 244.2 04-28-2009 23:02:03 0.241 11.206 114.2 272.4 04-28-2009 23:03:04 0.096 11.312 127.5 526.8 04-28-2009 23:04:03 0.116 11.271 116.1 252.0 04-28-2009 23:05:04 0.101 11.310 116.6 323.9 04-28-2009 23:06:03 0.100 11.297 128.6 197.4 04-28-2009 23:07:03 0.098 11.311 120.2 193.2 04-28-2009 23:08:04 0.098 11.313 131.9 182.7 04-28-2009 23:09:03 0.100 11.293 263:0 169.4 04-28-2009 23:10:04 0.099 11.254 823.0 166,0 04-28-2009 23:11:03 0.099 11.241 869.8 162.7 04-28-2009 23:12:04 0.098 11.246 844.9 157.0 04-28-2009 23:13:03 0.099 11.234 1215.1 152.3 04-28-2009 23:14:04 0.099 11.193 1406.2 149.1 04-28-2009 23:15:03 0.103 11.237 1201.5 151.0 04-28-2009 23:16:04 0.104 11.306 169.7 211.3 04-28-2009 23:17:04 0.100 11.295 134.0 150.5 04-28-2009 23:18:03 0.100 11.242 479.0 135.5 04-28-2009 23:19:04 0.101 11.138 1806.6 132.7 04-28-2009 23:20:03 0.101 11.207 1552.4 135.1 04-28-2009 23:21:04 0.102 11.114 2329.4 132.4 04-28-2009 23:22:03 0.101 11.221 1454.4 131.6 04-28-2009 23:23:04 0.102 11.276 886.3 130.1 04-28-2009 23:24:03 0.102 11.291 294.3 138.9**04-28~2009** 23:25:03 0.102 11.189 1580.3 122.8 04-28-2009 23:26:04 0.102 11.281 1025.5 126.9 04-28-2009 23:27:03 0.103 11.305 235.8 129.3 04-28-2009 23:28:04 0.101 11.289 320.0 122.4 04-28-2009 23:29:03 0.103 11.200 1106.3 120.8 04-28-2009 23:30:04 0.102 11.136 1906.0 119.4 04-28-2009 23:31:03 0.104 11.083 2666.3 116.8 04-28-2009 23:32:04 0.104 11.070 3056.4 116.5 04-28-2009 23:33:03 0.105 11.207 1797.5 117.0 04-28-2009 23:34:03 0.104 11.159 1491.4 117.1 04-28-2009 23:35:04 0.105 11.134 2282.7 114.2 04-28-2009 23:36:03 0.104 11.194 1475.7 113.5 04-28-2009 23:37:04 0.105 11.196 1113.2 113.5 04-28-2009 23:38:03 0.107 11.118 2111. 3 112.5 04-28-2009 23:39:04 0.105 11.165 1756.2 111.3 04-28-2009 23:40:03 0.107 11.169 2182.2 111.5

Page 1

### Test Run 6 STRATA Version 2.0 02 CO2 CO NOx

% % 

### ppm ppm 04-28-2009 23:41:04 0.106 11.288 .630.3 112.8 04-28-2009 23:42:03 0.107 11.292 442.1 116.6 04-28-2009 23:43:04 0.106 11.313 163.2 122.8 04-28-2009 23:44:03 0.115 11.312 160.4 131.6 

# tA\-VVl ( 

### 04-28-2009 23:45:03 0.114 11.322 207.7 13.3.4 04-28-2009 23:46:04 0.109 11.308 291.8 146.6 04-28-2009 23:47:03 0.106 11.265 591.0 120.3 04-28-2009 23:48:04 0.109 11.092 2310.7 106.9 Run Averages 02 CO2 

## co NOx % % 

### ppm ppm 04-28-2009 23:48:04 0.104 11.248 818.3 189.6 Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No. 1 Test Run 6 End

Page 2Final System Bias Check for Run 6 . STRATA Version 2.0 Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No.1 Run 

### 10: U1-M Reference CyUnder Numbers Zero Span 02 XC016125 CC112179 CO2 XC016125 CC112179 CO CC112179 XC016125 NOx XC016125 SG9132445 Daterrime 

### 4/28/2009 23:53:34 PASSED Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx Units % % ppm ppm Zero RefCyi 0 0 0 0 Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 Zero Avg 0.124 0.066 3.5 1.9 Zero Bias% 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 Zero Drift% 0 0.7 0 0 Span RefCyl 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 1008 Span Avg 9.484 8.819 4454.4 978.8 Span Bias% 1.1 1.8 0.8 -2.9 Span Drift% -0.1 0.5 1 -2.4 Ini ZeroAvg 0.113 -0.072 3.5 1.9 Ini SpanAvg 9.52 8.731 4363.3 1002.9 RunAvg 0.104 11.248 818.3 189.6 Co 0.119 -0.003 3.5 1.9 Cm 9.502 8.775 4408.8 990.8 CorrectAvg -0.015 11.575 845.3 192.3Test Run 7 STRATA Version 2.0 02 CO2 CO NOx

% % ppm ppm Begin calculating**~un** averages 04-29-2009 00:03:0S 0.112 11.315 193.8 153.6 04-29-2009 00:04:08 0.119 11.324 126.2 260.6

# U~

# ../

# r'\ 04-29-2009 00:05:07 0.124 11.326 114.2 535.1 / I 04-29-2009 00:06:08 0.113 11.352 129.0 491.4 04-29-2009 00:01:07 0.109 11.342 172.1 196.7 04-29-2009 00:OS:08 0.108 11.347 146.5 256.9 04-29-2009 00:09:07 0.104 11.302 347.0 160.4 04-29-2009 00:10:0S 0.106 11.257 1240.7 111.6 04-29-2009 00:11:07 0.104 11.317 655.0 142.0 04-29-2009 00:12:08 0.109 11.328 188.6 289.7 04-29-2009 00:13:08 0.115 11.323 131.1 303.1 04-29-2009 00:14:07 0.117 11.326 114.6 405.3 04-29-2009 00:15:08 0.116 11.332 107.8 642.6 04-29-2009 00:16:07 0.120 11.331 105.9 758.6 04-29-2009 00:17:08 0.109 11.336 129.7 339.8 04-29-2009 00:18:07 0.107 11.339 130.5 204.7 04-29-2009 00:19:08 0.104 11.324 257.5 185.8 04-29-2009 00:20:07 0.106 11.334 347.0 156.6 04-29-2009 00:21:08 0.109 11.33S 219.9 243.2 04-29-2009 00:22:0S
. 0.109 11.342 147.7 309.1 04-29-2009 00:23:07 0.121 11.337 106.6 499.9 04-29-2009 00:24:0S 0.129 11.335 95.3 721.3 04-29-2009 00:25:07 0.124 11.344 94.6 66S.3 04-29-2009 00:26:08 0.119 11.348 101.0 485.3 04-29-2009 00:27:07 0.119 11.350 96.5 607.6 04-29-2009 00:2S:0S 0.112 11.362 9S.3 550.2 04-29-2009 00:29:07 0.112 11.356 104.1 345.4 04-29-2009 00:30:08 0.104 11.332 269.5 195.5 04-29-2009 00:31:0S 0.106 11.310 574.2 131. 9 04-29-2009 00:32:07 0.108 11.341 160.3 251.9 04-29-2009 00:33:08 0.108 11.331 261.0 152.8 04-29-2009 00:34:07 0.108 11.341 202.4 155.2 04-29-2009 00:35:08 0.111 11.346 136.0 255.4 04-29-2009 00:36:07 0.115 11.348 123.1 359.6 04-29-2009 00:37:08 0.123 11.344 109.6 390.7 04-29-2009 00:38:07 0.113 11.353 109.S 486.4 04-29-2009 00:39:08 0.113 11.356 120.5 316.1 04-29-2009 00:40:08 0.110 11.343 230.5 225.6 04-29-2009 00:41:07 0.110 11.347 lS4.4 157.3 04-29-2009 00:42:0S 0.109 11.342 265.8 167.6 04-29-2009 00:43:07 0.112 11.340 366.0 201.8 04-29-2009 00:44:08 0.111 11.352 265.3 1S9.4 04-29-2009 00:45:07 0.123 11.359 174.3 367.1 04-29-2009 00:46:08 0.130 11.360 110.2 644.9 04-29-2009 00:47:07 0.118 11.352 113.6 407.9 04-29-2009 00:48:08 0.113 11.356 143.0 234.6 04-29-2009 00:49:08 0.114 11.350 170.3 231.6 04-29-2009 00:50:0S 0.115 11.358 131.3 323.9 04-29-2009 00:51:08 0.116 11.347 225.1 172.7 04-29-2009 00:52:07 0.119 11.356 137.9 528.3 04-29-2009 00:53:08 0.121 11.351 137.1 45S.7 04-29-2009 00:54:07 0.126 11.345 119.5 427.2

Page 1

### Test Run 1 STRATA Version 2.0 02 CO2 CO NOx

% % 

### ppm ppm 04-29-2009 00:55:08 0.122 11.351 101.8 644.6 04-29-2009 00:56:01 0.113 11.345 161.4 227.2

# u~'M 04-29-2009 00:51:08 0.119 11.336 131.5 261.5
, 04-29-2009 00:59:01 0.115 11.346 134.6 290.6 ( 

### 04-29-2009 00:59:08 0.114 11.344 140.8 188.2 04-29-2009 01:00:08 0.114 11.324 361.3 181.8 04-29-2009 01:01:07 0.113 11.347 182.0 195.5 04-29-2009 01:02:09 0.127 11.337 123.2 312.8 Run Averages 02 CO2 CO NOx % % 

### ppm ppm 04-29-2009 01:02:08 0.114 11.339 198.4 329.1 Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit NO.,. 

## \(.J.../ Test Run 7 End

Page 2Final System Bias Check for Run 7 . STRATA Version 2.0 Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvdfacility Location: Unit 

# NO."Z ...p./ Run 

### 10: U3-M

.( 

### (

Reference Cylinder Numbers Zero Span 02 XC016125 CC112179 CO2 XC016125 CC112179 CO CC112179 XC016125 NOx XC016125 SG9132445 DatelTime 

### 4/29/2009 1:08:44 PASSED Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx Units 

### % % ppm ppm Zero RefCyl 0 0 0 0 Zero Cal 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 ZeroAvg 0.135 0.146 3.5 2 Zero Bias% 0.4 0.6 0 0.2 Zero Drift% 0 0.4 0 0 Span Ref Cyl 9.641 9.031 4570 1013 Span Cal 9.746 9.152 4529.3 1008 Span Avg 9.484 8.866 4333.3 958.4 Span Bias% 1.1 1.5 2.2 -4.9 Span Drift% 0 0.2 -1.4 -2.0 Ini ZeroAvg 0.124 0.066 3.5 1.9 Ini Span Avg 9.484 8.819 4454.4 978.8 Run Avg 0.114 11.339 198.4 329.1 Co 0.129 0.106 3.5 2 Cm 9.484 8.843 4393.8 968.6 Correct Avg -0.016 11.611 202.9 342.8

# (

\ 

## APPENDIXB 

# CALIBRATIONDATA 1..M2
..4 Calibration Documentation 2. 

## SiteSpecUic i\:nalyzer 

# Checks 3. Calibration**GasCertificatesofAllaly~is** 

## .. 4.
. Analyzer

# Performance Checks

r\.

## APPENDIXB CALIBRATIONDATA·

. . .

. . 

## 1.· 

# M2-4Calibration**DQCUment~tion**/ \ 

# Pitot Tube Inspection Sheet PitotNwnber:**RP~201** 

### Calibrated 

### By:
______ 1_.

L_o;...w_e
____ _ Inspection 

### Date: 01105/2009 

### Reviewed 

### By:
______ C;;..;

• ...;.F...;.i...;.n...;.k
____ _ PitotType: Detachable Tip

# t'--

__... Fixed 

# I X PMlO 

# 1
....._----' Coefficient: A sidec=J BSidec=J WindThnnel Calibration? No

# 0 Yes 

# =1====1**~** Diagram 1

Degree Indicating level position for determining CLI and <>':. 

### Diagram 2

Degree indicating lel/lll position for determining PI and I!z.

Degree Indicating level position for detenninlng Tthen calculatez. 

# J,**~--- _~Vj** __ 

## fd



# . t/
Degree Indlcallng lel/lll posnlon for determining 6 then calculate w. 

### Level? Obstructions? Damaged? Diagram 1 

### _100 < 

### a., < +lOa 

## = _100 

### < CX:l 

### < 

### +100::: Diagram 2 

### -So < 

### 131 < 

### +5° 

# = -S° < 

### 132 < 

### +50= 

### Diagram3 

## r= 0= 

### A= Pa 

### = 

### P b 

### =AJ2 >= 

### 0.188"**~** 

### D t**~** 

### 0.375" 

## = LOS D t 

### <Al2 

### < 

### 1.5 Dt

## = z

## =A tany

### < 0.125" 

## = w

## =A tan ® 

### < 0.03125" 

# = wand

### zmeet 

### specs?

Comments: 

### 24 in.Mini S-type

### wI3/16" Pitot 

### & 

### 112" Sheath TC: 

### RT-201 YES NO NO

1 0

0 0

0 0 0.488 

### 0.249 0.189 YES 0.0000 

### 0.0000

YES

Thepitot tube/probe meets orexceeds all specifications criteria and/or applicable design features andis hereby assigned apitottube coefficient factor of0.84, unless a specific wind tunnel calibration coefficient has been determined. 40 CPR 60, Appendix A, Method 2. Verifythe minimum3/4 inch separationbetweenthe pitottube andthe nozzle andminimum2inch setback ( ofthethennocouple (or 314" separation) inthe assembled probe.

## Pitot Tube Inspection Sheet Probe Configuration
Pitot Number: RP-201 

### Inspection Date: 01/05/2009

A.

8.



### c.

OR 

### D. Calibrated 

### By: J. 

### Lowe**------------~~~------------** 

### Reviewed 

### By: 

### C. Fink

--------------------------------------- 

## D, =l 0.189 

## Dn=1 NA



## a=1 NA 

## Pa=1 0.249 

## Pb=1 0.249 

## b=1 NA 

## c=1 NA 

## d=1 NA 

## e=1 NA OR 

## c=1 NA 

## f=1 2.1 

### Specifications (EPA Method2)
Dt = 

### 3116" to 3/8" Dn = 

### 112" a 

### 2: 3/4" b 

### 2: 0 

### c 

### 2: 3" d 

### 2: 3" 

### e

### 2: 3/4" f 

### 2: 2" 

## Pa=Pb 1.05 Dt**~** P**~** 1.50 

### Dt



### IDOES PITOT CONFIGURATION MEET SPECIFICATIONS? 

### YES

## ( 

# THERMOCOUPLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM
THERMOCOUPLE 10: 

### RT-201 PITOT or PROBE 10: 

### RP-201



# -------- -------- 3·POINT CALIBRATION Calibrated Source Reference Thermocouple Percent Mantle Reviewed Date By (specify) Temp, 

### of Temp, 

### of Error (1) Heat ·250 

### F 

### By Ambient 

### 73 .73 0.0 07/11/08 D. Brewster Ice Bath 

### 36 36 0.0 NA C. Fink Boiling Water 

### 212 22 -28.3

EPA APPROVED ALTERNATIVE METHOD (Alt
- 011) SINGLE POINT CALIBRATION Calibrated Reference Thermocouple Difference (3) Continuity Pass I Date 

### By Temp, 

### OF (2) Temp, 

### .oF I(within 

### + 2

## °F) Check (4) Fall 

### 10/20/08 KRL 

### 78 78 0 Good Pass 

### 01/05/09 

### J. Lowe 

### 76 76 1 Good Pass 

### 04/30/09 KRL 

### 75 75 0 Good Pass

1) % error = (Thermocouple Temperature +460)
- (Reference Temperature +460) x 100, should be < 1.5% Reference Temperature +460 2) Reference Thermometer Is mercury-In-glass and ASTM certified, unless otherwise noted. 3) After each test run series, check lIle accuracy (and, hence, the calibration) of each lIlermocouple system at ambient temperature.

The temperatures of the therrnocouple and reference therrnometers shall agree within + 2°F 4) The continuity check Involves subjecting the tip of the thermocouple to a change In temperature to check for crimps, loose

connections, or reversed connections. Thermocouples with crimps and loose connections will not Immediately respond to temperature changes, and those with reversed connections will show a temperature change In the opposite direction. RAL-TC CAL.XLS Reviewed 

### By KRL C. Fink

KRL

### MeterBoxID Gas MeterNumber CalibratedBy
Orifice ID Orifice Coefficient K' AmbientTemperature Vacuum**~14.0"** Hg) DeltaH Initial Volume Fe Final Volume Fe Total**~5** Ft 3) Initial DGM Temperature 

### "F Final DGM Temperature 

### "F Average Temperature 

### "F Time Minutes Time Seconds DeltaH@ Gamma(Y) Average Gamma (Y) Delta H@ tolerance**~.** 

## Dry 

# Gas Meter 5-Point Full Test

M3 8759

J. 

### Pennington 

# J Ron #1 Ron#l Ron #1 Rnn#l 

### CalibrationDate Barometric Pressure Orifice SetCalibrationDate Ron #1 Rnn#l Ron#1 

# -

Gamma(Y) Delta H@ Pass 2/11/2009 

### 29.56 2125/2008 Ron #1 Ron#1

Pass Pass



## , - 0.9927 -, 1.950

QA 1

### QC Check: Sign and Date 

# C2e1U 02-14-09 Ron#1

## Dry Gas MeterTemperature Display Calibration
MeterBoxID Date Calibrated By
Input Temperature M3 

### 211112009 J. Pennington

I • Channel temperatures mustagree with +1- 5 Op or 3 

## °c 2
_ Acceptabletemperature difference is less than 1.5 % 

# I Reference Calibrator Serial Number Reference Calibration Date Temperature Reading from Individual Thermocouple Input1



### Pass 

### Dry Gas MeterThermocouple Calibration3 

### IReference Thermometer 

### 83 82 

### Omega-CL23A T-235647 8/11/2008

Pass Pass

Pass

3
_ Drygas meter thermicoupJe iscompared to an ASTM type mercuryinglass reference thermometer


### QA 

### I QC Check: Sign and Date

# ae~u 02-14-09(



# c ...\



## .APPENDIX B
. 

# CALIBRATION DATA 2. 

## Site Specific**AnalY~f!rChecks** (:**~**

### ( 

## Instrumental TestMethod Quality Assurance Data
MARTA Atlanta, Unit No.1, 2, & 

### 3


### NO

## zto NO Converter Efficiency Test

. SX45718 

### 11118/2011 

### 60.72

Acceptance Criteria: If

### the instrument response indicates at least 90 percent N02 

### to NO 

### conversion, the converter is acceptable Ifthe instrument response indicates less than 

### 90 percent N02 

### to NO conversion, the converter is unacceptable and repair orreplacement is required before repeating the check

CEM-QA-KRL.xlsCalibration Error Test at Run 1 . STRATA Version 2.0 02 C02 CO NOx % % ppm ppm 

### 4/28/2009 16:29:20 1.054 2.462 1647.3 382.7 

### 4/28/2009 17:47:20 21.014 0.178 10.1 54.5 

### 4/28/2009 17:48:21 21.039 0.182 6.31 54.91N02 Converter Check 

### 4/28/2009 17:49:22 15.779 2.917 6.5 55 (55.2ppm N02 gas) Calibration Error Test at Run 1 Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No.2 Reference Cylinder Numbers Zero Low-range Mid-range High-range 02XC016125 CC112179 CC117038 C02 XC016125 CC112179 CC117038 CO CC112179 CC61468 XC016125 CC18971 NOx XC016125 SG9120995 ALM00412 SG9132445 DatelTime 

### 4/28/2009 17:52:09 PASSED Analyte 02 CO2 CO NOx Units % % ppm ppm Zero RefCyl 0 0 0 0 ZeroAvg 0.029 0.03 5.6 0 Zero Erro,.o/o 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 Low RefCyi 2303 240.9 LowAvg 2228.8 245.2 Low Error% 0.8 0.4 Mid RefCyl 9.64 9.03 4570 495 Mid Avg 9.746 9.152 4529.3 495.1 Mid Error% 0.4 0.6 0.5 0 High RefCyi 23.95 18.93 8875 1013 High Avg 24.065 18.752 8891.6 1008 High Erro,.% 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.5



# (.:

.

## Instrumental TestMethod QualityAssurance Data

RackA 

### ppm

Response Time (sec.) 

### 94 StackGas 

### r_:,

5.9 6976 363.81Test Run 1 Begin. STRATAVersion 2.0 Response Time Demonstration Operator: Kenloder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility location: Unit No. 2 02 CO2 CO NOx % % ppm ppm 412812009 18:16:12 0.177 9.092 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:13 0.174 9.092 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:14 0.176 9.092 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:15 0.172 9.092 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:16 0.179 9.092 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:17 0.184 9.092 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:18 0.174 9.092 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:19 0.177 9.082 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:20 0.169 9.092 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:21 0.178 9.092 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:23 0.17 9.092 5.9 234.2 4128/2009 18:16:24 0.177 9.092 5.9 234.2 4128/2009 18:16:25 0.169 9.092 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:26 0.18 9.092 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:27 0.171 9.092 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:28 0.182 9.092 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:29 0.171 9.092 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:30 0.176 9.092 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:31 0.176 9.092 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:32 0.172 9.092 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:33 0.172 9.045 5.9 234.2 412812009 18:16:35 0.167 7.529 5.9 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:36 0.205 3.782 5.8 234.1 4/2812009 18:16:37 0.258 1.634 5.7 234.2 4/2812009 18:16:38 0.3 0.887 15.6 234.1 412812009 18:16:39 0.292 0.572 15.5 234.1 4/2812009 18:16:40 0.284 0.452 15.6 234.1 412812009 18:16:41 0.262 0.391 15.6 234.2 412812009 18:16:42 0.245 0.361 15.6 234.2 412812009 18:16:43 0.229 0.342 15.6 234.2 412812009 18:16:44 0.221 0.329 15.6 234.1 412812009 18:16:46 0.214 0.312 15.6 234.2 412812009 18:16:47 0.204 0.302 15.6 234.2 412812009 18:16:48 0.201 0.302 15.6 234.2 412812009 18:16:49 0.2 0.292 5.7 234.2 412812009 18:16:50 0.2 0.292 5.7 234.2 412812009 18:16:51 0.194 0.281 5.8 234.2 412812009 18:16:52 0.195 0.272 5.8 234.2 412812009 18:16:53 0.192 0.272 5.7 121.6 412812009 18:16:54 0.19 0.272 5.8 121.5 412812009 18:16:55 0.181 0.262 5.7 121.5 412812009 18:16:57 0.19 0.262 5.8 121.5 Begin calculating run averages 412812009 18:16:59 0.193 0.262 5.7 121.5 412812009 18:17:00 0.19 0.262 5.8 121.5 4/28/2009 18:17:01 0.188 0.252 5.7 121.5 412812009 18:17:02 0.188 0.252 5.7 121.5 412812009 18:17:03 0.19 0.252 5.7 121.6 412812009 18:17:04 0.19 0.252 5.7 121.6 412812009 18:17:05 0.186 0.252 5.7 121.6 4128/2009 18:17:07 0.188 0.241 5.7 6.5 412812009 18:17:08 0.186 0.241 5.7 6.5 412812009 18:17:09 0.191 0.241 5.8 6.5 412812009 18:17:10 0.189 0.241 5.7 6.5 412812009 18:17:11 0.19 0.241 5.7 6.5 412812009 18:17:12 0.184 0.241 5.7 6.5 412812009 18:17:13 0.194 0.242 5.7 6.5 4/2812009 18:17;14 0.186 0.241 5.7 6.5 4/2812009 18:17:15 0.191 0.232 5.7 6.5 412812009 18:17:16 0.181 0.232 5.7 6.5 4/2812009 18:17:17 0.196 0.232 5.9 6.5 412812009 18;17:19 0.187 0.232 5.9 6.5 

# C_Test Run 1 Begin. STRATA Version 2.0 ResponseTime Demonstration 

## ( Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No. 2 02 CO2 CO NOx % % ppm ppm 412812009 18:17:20 0.202 0.232 5.9 1.7 412812009 18:17:21 0.185 0.232 5.9 1.7 412812009 18:17:22 0.194 0.232 5.9 1.7 412812009 18:17:23 0.192 0.232 5.9 1.7 412812009 18:17:24 0.197 0.232 5.8 1.7 Start Upscale Response Urne test (Nitrogen to Stack gas) 412812009 18:17:25 0.192 0.224 5.9 1.8 4128/2009 18:17:26 0.191 0.222 5.8 1.7 4128/2009 18:17:27 0.191 0.28 5.8 1.7 412812009 18:17:28 0.189 2.129 5.9 1.7 412812009 18:17:30 0.197 6.485 15.9 1.7 4/2812009 18:17:31 0.188 9.315 36.1 1.8 412812009 18:17:32 0.188 10.393 120.8 1.8 4128/2009 18:17:33 0.188 10.675 335.7 1.8 412812009 18:17:34 0.19 10.742 565.4 1.8 412812009 18:17:35 0.19 10.n8 805.3 1.8 412812009 18:17:36 0.191 10.802 1045 1.8 412812009 18:17:37 0.189 10.812 1284.9 1.8 'C02channel upscale Responsetime 4128/2009 18:17:38 0.187 10.821 1534.7 1.8 (12 seconds) 4128/2009 18:17:39 0.195 10.832 1784.4 1.8 412812009 18:17:41 0.181 10.848 2024.3 1.8 4/2812009 18:17:42 0.194 10.862 2254.1 1.8 412812009 18:17:43 0.182 10.872 2704.1 1.8 412812009 18:17:44 0.194 10.872 2904 1.8 412812009 18:17:45 0.183 10.882 3123.9 1.8 412812009 18:17:46 0.192 10.882 3384 1.8 412812009 18:17:47 0.189 10.882 3573.8 1.8 412812009 18:17:48 0.186 10.892 3784.2 1.8 412812009 18:17:49 0.187 10.892 4054.1 1.8 412812009 18:17:50 0.188 10.902 4204.1 1.8 412812009 18:17:52 0.188 10.902 4314 1.9 412812009 18:17:53 0.186 10.902 4524.1 152.1 412812009 18:17:54 0.188 10.902 4794.3 152.1 412812009 18:17:55 0.189 10.902 4973.7 152.1 412812009 18:17:56 0.191 10.893 5144 152.1 412812009 18:17:57 0.188 10.892 5244.2 152.1 412812009 18:17:58 0.189 10.892 5434.4 152.1 412812009 18:17:59 0.193 10.892 5574.3. 152.1 412812009 18:18:00 0.189
. 10.892 5744.5 152.1 412812009 18:18:01 0.188 10.884 5924.6 152.1 412812009 18:18:03 0.176 10.883 6184.8 152.1 412812009 18:18:04 0.214 10.883 6345.1 152.1 412812009 18:18:05 0.201 10.883 6465.1 152.1 412812009 18:18:06 0.206 10.893 6595.4 152.1 412812009 18:18:07 0.193 10.892 6585.3 152.2 412812009
. 18:18:08 0.197 10.892 6625.3 152.1 4/2812009 18:18:09 0.193 10.893 6715.5 152.1 412812009 18:18:10 0.194 10.902 6855.6 152.1 4128/2009 18:18:11 0.196 10.892 6845.7
. 152.1 412812009 18:18:12 0.194 10.893 6905.5 152.2 95% Increaseto stableresponse of7266.1ppm 412812009 18:18:14 0.19 10.893 6955.7 152.2 (47 seconds) 412812009 18:18:15 0.191 10.893 7035.7 152.2 412812009 18:18:16 0.192 10.902 7025.7 152.2 412812009 18:18:17 0.193 10.902 7095.7 152.2 412812009 18:18:18 0.189 10.902 7025.7 152.2 412812009 18:18:19 0.193 10.902 6905.5 327.2 4128/2009 18:18:20 0.191 10.902 6955.8 327.2 4I28l2009 18:18:21 0.194 10.893 6935.6 327.2 412812009 18:18:22 0.194 10.893 6915.8 327.2 4/2812009 18:18:23 0.186 10.893 6945.7 327.2 412812009 18:18:25 0.197 10.893 7045.9 327.2 412812009 18:18:26 0.19**10~902** 7086 327.2

# (~ 412812009 18:18:27 0.2 10.893 7186 327.2Test Run 1 Begin. STRATAVersion 2.0 Response TIme Demonstration Operator: Ken Loder (' Plant Name: Marta Peny Blvd Facility Location: Unit No. 2 02 CO2 CO NOx % % ppm ppm 412812009 18:18:28 0.178 10.902 7216 327.2 412812009 18:18:29 0.195 10.8931 7266.11 327.2 Stable reading 412812009 18:18:30 0.187 10.902 7196.1 327.2 412812009 18:18:31 0.19 10.902 7216.1 327.2 412812009 18:18:32 0.195 10.893 7076 342.4 4/2812009 18:18:33 0.191 10.893 7105.9 342.4 412812009 18:18:34 0.198 10.893 7226.1 342.4 412812009 18:18:36 0.19 10.902 7156.1 342.4 4/2812009 18:18:37 0.199 10.903 7176.1 342.4 4/2812009 18:18:38 0.19 10.902 7446.3 342.4 4/2812009 18:18:39 0.193 10.903 7316.4 342.4 4/2812009 18:18:40 0.192 10.903 7476.5 342.4 4/28/2009 18:18:41 0.195 10.893 7416.3 342.4 4/2812009 18:18:42 0.204 10.883 7346.3 342.4 4/28/2009 18:18:43 0.195 10.892 7296.2 342.4 4128/2009 18:18:44 0.208 10.884 7186.1 342.4 4/2812009 18:18:45 0.193 10.893 7116.1 342.4 4/28/2009 18:18:47 0.203 10.893 7156.2 342.4 4/2812009 18:18:48 0.195 10.893 7036.1 342.4 4128/2009 18:18:49 0.202 10.893 7166.2 342.4 412812009 18:18:50 0.194 10.893 7186.2 342.4 4128/2009 18:18:51 0.193 10.893 7186.2 342.4 412812009 18:18:52 0.19 10.893 7246.3 342.4 412812009 18:18:53 0.194 10.893 7276.3 342.4 412812009 18:18:54 0.201 10.893 7216.2 342.4 4/2812009 18:18:55 0.193 10.903 7186.2 342.4 412812009 18:18:56 0.192 10.893 7066.1 342.4 412812009 18:18:58 0.198 10.903 7096.1 342.4 412812009 18:18:59 0.191 10.903 7056.11 361.2!Stable reading ResponseTime 94 seconds Start downscale Responsetime test (Tum on Nitrogen gas) 4/28/2009 18:19:00 0.195 10.903 6976 361.2 4/2812009 18:19:01 0.189 10.903 7006.1 361.2 4/2812009 18:19:02 0.194 10.903 6886 361.2 4/2812009 18:19:03 0.196 10.903 6926 361.2 412812009 18:19:04 0.197 10.903 6945.9 361.2 4/2812009 18:19:05 0.187 10.903 6946 361.2 4/2812009 18:19:06 0.198 10.903 6916.1 361.2 412812009 18:19:07 0.198 10.903 6976.1 361.2 4/2812009 18:19:09 0.195 10.903 6835.9 361.2 4/28/2009 18:19:10 0.194 10.903 6716 361.2 4/2812009 18:19:11 0.197 10.903 6966.1 361.2 4/2812009 18:19:12 0.188 10.903 6986.1 350.7 4/2812009 18:19:13 0.201 10.903 7046.2 350.7 4/2812009 18:19:14 0.185 10.903 7216.3 350.7 412812009 18:19:15 0.2 10.903 7226.3 350.7 4/2812009 18:19:16 0.196 10.903 7156.4 350.7 412812009 18:19:17 0.176 10.903 7166.4 350.7 412812009 18:19:18 0.177 10.903 7286.5 350.7 412812009 18:19:20 0.189 10.893 7196.5 350.7 412812009 18:19:21 0.183 10.853 7116.3 350.7 412812009 18:19:22 0.184 8.734 7196.3 350.7 412812009 18:19:23 0.194 3.829 7055.5 350.7 412812009 18:19:24 0.224 1.556 6965.2 350.7 412812009 18:19:25 0.255 0.86 6825 333 412812009 18:19:26 0.257 0.662 6464.9 333 C02 Downscale Response time

# = 26 seconds 4/2812009 18:19:27 0.262 0.587 6194.6 333 4128/2009 18:19:28 0.253 0.51 5844.1 333 412812009 18:19:29 0.247 0.442 5594 333 4/2812009 18:19:31 0.24 0.402 5414 333 4128/2009 18:19:32 0.223 0.382 5333.9 333 4/28/2009 18:19:33 0.224 0.362 4973.7 333 

# ( 412812009 18:19:34 0.206 0.352 4823.9 333Test Run 1 Begin. STRATAVersion 2.0 Response Time Demonstration Operator: Ken Loder Plant Name: Marta Perry Blvd Facility Location: Unit No. 2 02 CO2 CO NOx 0/0 % ppm ppm 412812009 18:19:35 0.205 0.342 4523.9 333 4/2812009 18:19:36 0.195 0.332 4244 333 412812009 18:19:37 0.196 0.332 4104 333 412812009 18:19:38 0.192 0.322 3954.1 333 412812009 18:19:39 0.195 0.312 3734.1 333 4/2812009 18:19:40 0.196 0.312 3614 333 4/28/2009 18:19:42 0.183 0.302 3413.9 333 412812009 18:19:43 0.189 0.302 3122 333 412812009 18:19:44 0.182 0.292 2744.3 333 412812009 18:19:45 0.191 0.292 2524.5 333 412812009 18:19:46 0.11:18 0.292 2334 333 412812009 18:19:47 0.189 0.292 2174.4 332.9 412812009 18:19:48 0.183 0.282 2024.3 332.9 412812009 18:19:49 0.182 0.282 1884.5 332.9 412812009 18:19:50 0.185 0.272 1744.6 173.3 4/2812009**18:~9:51** 0.182 0.272 1624.8 173.3 412812009 18:19:53 0.187· 0.272 1504.9 173.3 4/2812009 18:19:54 0.185 0.272 1294.7 173.3 412812009 18:19:55 0.185 0.262 1135 173.3 412812009 18:19:56 0.181 0.262 1025 173.3 412812009 18:19:57 0.183 0.262 915.3 173.3 4128/2009 18:19:59 0.183 0.262 735 173.3 4/2812009 18:20:00 0.186 0.262 665.2 173.3 412812009 18:20:01 0.18 0.262 585.2 173.3 412812009 18:20:02 0.181 0.262 525.4 173.3 412812009 18:20:04 0.182 0.262 465.4 173.3 412812009 18:20:05 0.182 0.252 365.7 173.3 412812009 18:20:06 0.183 0.252 315.8 173.3 CO Downscale Response time. 86seconds (

# . 412812009 18:20:07 0.18 0.252 275.8 173.3 4/2812009 18:20:08 0.183 0.252 245.9 173.3 412812009 18:20:09 0.183 0.252 205.9 173.3 412812009 18:20:10 0.192 0.252 175.8 9 NOx Downscale Response time.70 seconds 412812009 18:20:11 0.185 0.252 155.9! 91Stable Zero response 4/2812009 18:20:12 0.185 0.252 125.9 9 412812009 18:20:13 0.188 0.252 105.8 9 412812009 18:20:15 0.185 0.252 95.7 9 4/2812009 18:20:16 0.187 0.252 65.8 9 412812009 18:20:17 0.18 0.252 55.8 9 412B12oo9 18:20:18 0.187 0.252 45.9 9 412812009 18:20:19 0.179 0.252 46 9 412812009 18:20:20 0.188 0.252 35.9 9 4/2812009 18:20:21 0.175 0.252 36.1 9 4/2812009 18:20:22 0.182 0.242 26 9 4/2812009 18:20:23 0.174 0.242 25.9 9 412812009 18:20:24 0.179 0.242 25.9 9 412812009 18:20:26**0.18~** 0.242 25.9 9 412812009
. 18:20:27 0.182 0.2421 15.8

## 1 9 Stable Zero response 412812009 18:20:28 0.184 0.242 15.8 9 412812009 18:20:29 0.177 0.242 15.8 9 412812009 18:20:30 0.18 0.242 15.8 9 4/2812009 18:20:31 0.175 0.242 15.8 9 412812009 18:20:32 0.1721 0.232

## 1 16 9. Stable Zero response

### Instrumental Test Method Quality Assurance Data

RackA



# r Response Time (sec.) 

### 94 Stack Gas Stack Gas I 361.2 Stack Gas 

### I 7266.1 343.23 6903.1 10.903 0.232 361.2 9.000 26.61 6976 15.800 363.81**--,~**

## Instrumental TestMethod QualityAssurance Data

Stratification Check·Three Point Short Traverse

" Difference Criteria: 

### < 5.0 %• SinglePoint, <10.0%

- Three Point, >10.0%· Twelve Point ppm Difference Criteria: 

### <0.5ppm·Single Point. 

### <1.0ppm - Three Point, 

### >1.0ppm· Twelve Point

CEM-QA-KRL.xls

## Instrumental Test Method Quality Assurance Data MARTA 

## 163550 Atlanta, Georgia Unit No.2 10/112008

"Difference Criteria: <5.0"-SinglePoint, <10.0"

- ThreePoint, >10.0"

- Twelve Point ppmDifference Criteria: 

### <0.5ppm - SinglePoint, <1.0ppm - Three Point, >1.0ppm - Twelve Point

CEM-QA-KRL.xls

# c. Instrumental TestMethod Quality Assurance Data MARTA 

### Atlanta, Georgia Unit No.3 10/1/2008

%Difference Criteria: 

### <$.0 %
..

### Single Point, <10.0%
.. Three Point, >10.0%
.. Twelve Point ppm Difference Criteria: < 

### 0.$ppm ..Single Point, <1.0ppm .. Three Point,
. >1.0ppm ..· Twelve Point

CEM-QA-KRL.xls

### (

## · A:PPENDIX B**C~mRATI0N** 

# DATA· ;

# ( , ..

. . "



## \

. .' I 

# (

l 1 \

### ( 

# t 

# I

. • 

## : ' i I 

## \ 

# I

)'.



# I i' 

# MAtHESON TRI-GAS· ask. •• The Gas Professionals 

### CerUficate ofAnalysis - 

### EPA Protocol Mixtures
Customer: Cylinder Number: TRC 

### SX45718 Protocol: G1 Reference 

### # RECERT 3106 Pasadena Freeway Pasadena. TX 77603 713-534-8217

Lot# T110213 Cylinder Pressure: 1500 PSIG Last Analysis Date: 11/18/2008 00 NOT USE THIS'CYONOER WHENTt:lE PRESSURE fALLS BELOW

., ','.-I.'::' 160 PSIG''

. , "'"::''''' i .' 

## '::,i:;**,,:~<** 

### ',"**',:~(.** Expiration Date: 11/1812010 REPLICATE RESPONSES Component Nitrogen Dioxide Date: 41312008 55.37 55.63 55.78 Mean Cone: 55.2 ppm +/- 2% reI BALANCE GAS: REFERENCE STANDARDS: Component Reference Standard: Cylinder

### #: Air

, Nitrogen Dioxide

SRM CAL011583 Concentration: ' S8.9 ppm Exp: Date: 5/112009 CERTIFIC.ATION INSTRUMENTS Component' MakelModel: Serial Number: 4easurement Principle: Last Calibration:

Notes: NitrOgen Dioxide Horiba CLA-510 42312910013 CHEMI 10123/2008 Date: 1111812008 54.89 54.80 54.88

This Certification was performed according to EPATraceability Protocol forAssay & Certification of**Gaseou~** Calibration Standards September 1997, using procedure G1 andlorG2.

### ~~-::-:-~-t. Anal¥st:

### ~.' LING WEN

. . ( Date: 11/1812008
Manufactured 

### By Specialty Gas Products, a Matheson Tri-Gas Company. Pasadena, Texas.**~---.-.** 

# AirD8S National Welders"

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE Customer: Airgas National Welders, Raleigh, NC Reference # e8-117197 NSGPO# 6783591 Certification Date: 6/11/2008 Customer PO# Expiration Date: 6/11/2010 Cylinder # SG9120995BAL Pressure, psig* 2000 CGA660 ANALYTICAL INFORMATION Product Code: 782405 METHOD: This standard was analyzed according 10 EPA Traceability Protocol forAssay and Certification of Gaseous CalibratiOR Standards: Procedure Gl (September 1997)
. ANALYZED CYLINDER Components Nitric Oxide Carbon Dioxide Oxides of Nitrogen - NOX Balance - Nitrogen
REFERENCE STANDARD Type/SRM Sample # NTRM# 81685 NTRM # 970511

INSTRUMENTATION InstrumentiModeVSerial # Nicolet 6700 AHR0801333 Certified Concentration 240.5 ppm

9.28% 240.9 ppm

Cvlinder#

CC207619 SG9169360BAL

Last Date Calibrated OS/22108 AnaMical Accuracy" +/-1% +1-1% +/-1%

Concentration

257 ppm NO/N2 13.837 % C02/N2

Analvtical Method Fourier Transform Infrared

Analyst:**-----T'--"'-----.....:;...;..;..;;.;.~~.........;........J.­** This report states accurately the results afthe investigation made upon the materia! s bmitted to the analytical laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine objectively the information requested. However, in connection with this report, Airgas National Welders shall have no liabilfty In excess ofestablished charge for this service. Assayed at Airgas National Welders, 630 United Drive, Durham, NC 27713 (919) 544-3772

000 nol use this standard when cylinder pressure Is below 150 psig. o'Analytlcal accuracy Includes typical known errorsources which. at least. include precision ofthe analytical instrument. NSG 020149LI J I



# i 

# t 

# \

.. , , 

### ",; I'

",



# , 

# .. P. O. Box 120ll ResearchTriangle Park, N.C. 27709 Phone 919/544·3772 

## CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: 'EPA 

## PROTOCOL GAS 

## MIXTURE Customer. National Welders, Raleigh, 

### ,Nc'1 Reference # 

### '88-115400**NSGP~** 6568044**~ C~rtification**  Date: 03/05/08 Customer POf 

# "

..",d Expiration Date: 03/05/10 Cylinder

### # ' ,I Pressure, psig* CGA660 ALM-041223 

### 2000

, '
...... 

### ANALYTICAL INFORMATION ' (1' :;. Product Code: 782406 METHOD: This standard was analyZedaecordirlg to EPA**Traceabm~** Protocol for Assay and Certification ofGaseous Calibration Standard,s: Procedure Gt (September 1997) , ,:.'

. '.**~** ANALYZED CYLINDER Componebts Certified Concentration Analytical**AQg!ra~-** Nitric Oxide Nitrogen Dioxide

, Carbon Dioxide

Balance - Nitrogen

.. ..**~**.........

# -
....... "...**~**

### ......... REFERENCE STANDARD Type/SRM Sample # GMIS ( Traceable to NTRM II 81686 ) GMIS (Traceableto SRM # 1675b )

INSTRUMENTATION lostrumenllModellSerial 

## ! KVBAnalect EN-844A 495 PPt.,1 

### \'

, <1.0**PP~'**

9.18 %';,

,**~** '.-. ....... 

### CVlioder ,.

CC117479 

### CCl17719

.Last Date Calibrated 02/13/08 +/-1%

QQncentration 

### 508.5 ppm NOIN2 14.06 

### % C021N2

Anal¥tic§' Method FourierTransform Infrared

# An~ Jesse Powell This report states accurately 

### the results of the investigation made upon the material submitted to the analytical laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine objectively the information requested. However, in connection with this report, Natronal Specialty Gases shalf have no liability in excess of established charge for this service. Assayed at National SpecIarty Gases, 630 United Drive, Durham, NC 27713(919) 544-3772 "00 not use thi$ standard when cylinder pressure lsbelOW 150 pslg.

# :~

-Analytical accoracy Includes typical known error souteeS which. at least. Include preCiSion ofthe analytical Instrument. NSG 020149L

# Airgas. CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS 

# Grade ofProduct: EPA Protocol Alrllas NatIonalWeldel'S 630United Olive Dumam, NC27713 (1119) 544·3772 Fax (918) 544-6297 www.alrgaSJ:llm Customer: Airgas National Werders Raleigh,NC Part Number: E03N190E15AC2R9 Reference Number: 122·7220899-4 Cylinder Number: Laboratory: Analysis 

### Date: SG9132445BAL ASG • Durham - NC Mar 10, 2009 Cylinder Volume: Cylinder Pressure: Valve Outlet: expiration Date: Mar 10, 2011 149Cu.Fl 2015 PSIG 660

Certification IXIrformed In accordaACe with 'EPATraceabllItiPr()(O(;01 (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procectures "sled. Anelyllcal Methodology does nc>t require correction for analyllcallnterferences. This cylinder has II tolaf ane1ytJcaI LlACertliinty as stated belowwith a confidence level of95%, The!1l a!1l no signirlcent Impurities ...nlch affectlhe use of this caUbnlUcn mixture. All conoenttallons are on a volume/Volume basis unless otherwise not&d.

. 00 Not Use This C)4inder below 1SO psIgJ.•. 1 Mega Pascal

'r ff ':"'.-.

Total oxides ofnitrogen 

### CALIBRATIONSTANDARDS Type LotiO Cylinder No Concentration Expiration Date NTRM 080613 CC254471 20.09% CARBON DIOXIDEJNITROGEN Jul15,2012 NTRM 080606 CC255668 1 025.3PPM NITRIC OXIOEINITROGEN May01,2012

, 

### ANALYfICALEQUIPMENT InstrumentIMakelModel Analytical Principle LastMultipointCalibration Nicolet 6700 CO2 FTIR Jan 15.2009 Nicolet 6700 S02 FTIR Feb 23. 2009

Paga·1 of 122.7220899-4

15000lANW(I 

# I ! 

# Airgas NationalWelders" -------_
..

Airgas NatlOllal Welders hftp:IAwNI.!IrgD.toIIl



### CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE Customer: Airgas National Welders, Raleigh, NC Reference # 88-119419 NSG POI 7041536 Certification Date: 10/1612008 Customer POI Expiration Date: 10/1612'011 Cylinder # CC112179 Pressure, psig* 2000 CGA 590 ANALYTICAL INFORMATION Product Code: 781358 METHOD: This standard was analyzed according 10 EPA Traceability Protocol forAssay end Certification of Gaseous Calibration Slandards: PrOcedure G1 (September t997)

. ANALYZED CYLINDER Components Carbon Dioxide Oxygen Balance - Nitrogen

BEFEBENCE STANDARD Type/sRM Sample # NTRM II 080613 NTRM(Batch # 060608)

INSTRUMENTATION Instrument/Model/Serial II Honba MPA - 510 02 (0.5-25%) 41499150042 Horiba VIA·510 C02 (0.5-20%) 42399380022 Certified Concentration 9.030% 9.640%

Cylinder #

CC254471 CC207906

Last Date Calibrated 09116108 09/19/08 Analytical Accuracy** +/-1% +/-1%

Concentration 20.09 % C02fN2 22.51 % 021N2

Analytical Method ParamagnetiC Non-dispersive Infrared

-- -Richard Sykes This report states accurately the results of the investigation made upon the material submitted to the analytical laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine objectivelylhe Information requested. However, In connection with this report, Airgas National Welders shall have no liability in excess of established charge for this service. Assayed atAlrgas National Welders, 630 UnHed Drive, Durham, NC 21713 (919) 

### 544-3n2**~o** nol use this slandard when cylinder pressure Is below 150 psig. "Analytical accuracy Includes typical known error sources which. at leas!. include precision ofthe analytical Instrument. NSG020149L**:"~** 

### .. 

# AiFgas, National Welders'"


# t ,1 

# t
. , '.:

...• 

### ..... , .'>
,.... 

### :!:: ' ",**,All1la~!faHonaIWtlders I\IIR:{~"~** 

# CERTIFICA:~'O-: ANALYSIS: EPA 

## PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE

. .', Customer: Airgas. National Welders, Raleigh, NC Reference II 88-117793 NSG po# 6851825 Certification 

### Date: 7/14/2008 Customer POll Expiration Date: 7/1412011 :Cylinder # CCt t?038 Pressure, psig* 2000 CGA296 ANALYTICAL INFORMATIQ,N Product Code:
- 781359 METHOD: This standard was ana\yl\l'4 according to EPA Traceability Prot.)col for Assay and Certification ofGaseous Calibration Standards: Procedure G1 (September 1997) AN81:.YZED**CYU~D!;;A** Compone!llli ' Certified Concentration AnsMical**Accur!i!c~** Carbon Dioxide 18.93% +1-1% Oxygen ''23.95% +1-1% Balance - NitrOgen

,**'N'·~F·** "':,

### .....**BEf~J:~ANDARO** Tvpe/SRM Sample /I Cylinder II Qoocentratiotl NTRM /I 080613 CC255351 20.09 % C02/N2 NTRM{Batch II 060608) CC207968 22.51 % 02/N2**~TBUMENTATION** Instrument/Model/Serial /I Horiba VIA-610 C02 (O.5-20%) 42399380022 Horiba MPA· 510 02 (0.5-250/0) 41499150042 last Date Calibrated 07/11108 07/11/08 Analytical Method Non-dispers.ive Infrared Paramagnetic

Analyst:

__

# ~gtJ_~_,==-,**-;:f;4I~** ___ ...;.R..;;;I,;;;.;Ch","a

.... rd;;...;;;,S

..... yk"""es",,-_ This report states accurately the results of**th~** investigation made upon the material submitted to the analytical laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine objectively the information requested. However, in connectionwith this report, A1rgas National Welders shall have no liability in excess of established charge for thisservice. Assayed atAirgas NationalWelders, 630 United Drive, Durham. NC 27713 (919) 544-3772 "'Do nol use thisstandard wh&n cylinder pressure is below 150 pslg. "'Analyllca! accuracy Includes typical known error sources which, at feast. include precision of the analytioa! Instrument NSG 020149L (,
.

# I

I
I I



# ( "" " \ 

### .

P. O. Box 12013 Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709 Phone 919/544-3772 

## CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS: 'EPA PROTOCOL GAS 

## MIXTURE Customer: Nationa! Welders, Raleigh, NC NSG

## ppJt
........ 5527438 Customer' PO# cylinder # CC61468

. ANALYTICAL INFORMATION· Reference# 

### 88-104791 Certification Date: 07/12106 Expiration Date: Pressure, psig* 

### Product Code: 07/12[09 

### 2000 780481 eGA 350
METHOD: ThIs standard W8!l anBlyze(j**acccir~!tiQ**

## to EPA Traceabllilyf>rolocol for Assay and Certification ofGaseous Calibration Standards: Procedure G1 (September'1997)

. .**!~. ~**  ANALYZED CYLINDER

. .Components Carbon Monoxide

Balance· Nitrogen i

. . Certified CQnbentratlon 

### 1 Analytical Accuracy"'" '2303 PPm 

### +/·1%

'i

• >:." '

.... ,.;.......

### ,;~t.:Ir'~"-.' ..... ' _ .....

;""'"

..$

.... '''-''_'_'_""_
......

### ~ . --.-....

### ~ ....."',..::
........ "'_
. 

## '. REFERENCE STANDARD Type/SRM Sample # 

### GMIS (Traceable 

### to SRM # 

### 2638a )

INSTRUMENTATION 

### lostrumentlModeVSerial #
Rosemount 880A CO U-1003870 Cyllnder#

.. CC61566



### Last 

### Pate Calibrated
07/12106 Concentration
3006 

### ppm COIN2

Analytical Method Non-dispersive Infrared

Analyst

# _"-,a~'t/:::...-_·~-.· __

# ~,-____ -=Bn:.:::'a:::..;n.:..P.;..:.

# M~o::.::o:!!re~ This report states accurately the results ofthe 

### investigation made upoQ Ihe material submitted to the analytical laboratory. 

### Every effort 

### has been made to determine**o~jectively** 

### the 

### Information requested. 

### However. in 

### connect/on with this 

### report, National 

### Specialty Gases 

### sHan have no liability 

### In 

### excess of

### established charge for this service. Assayed at National Specialty Gases, 630 United Drive, Durham, NC 27713 (919) 544·3772 *00 not use this standard when cylinder pressure 1$ below 160 pslg.

. ""Analytical accurecy InclUdes typIcal known error sources which, at leasl,include precision of the analytlcallnslNment NSG 020149L

# I i 

### I

.

-::' '.**,~.** 

### I' i.: i



## ! 

## i 

# -,r '"

P. 0,Box 12013 Resean::h,Trlangle Park, N.C. 27709 Phone 9T9/544-3772

.... . . ....**,.~.** ",
,. . .

> 

## CERTIFICAtE OF 

## ANALYSIS: 

# 'cPA PROTOCOLGAS 

## MIXTURE " Customer:

### Na~iaual Welders,

### R~leigh. 

## NO Referenc;e # 88,:106430

.

. NSG. PO# •...

## ~~~i~.,.;"

# '",",**"~""''''''**

# ,.......**CeH;.I~~tiqn** Date: 

### 02lQ5/07 Custo/iler,P0#

. 

# ·r."

. ":...1 ExP.i,f?tiq

## nDa1e: 02/05/10. CYlinderlt XC01'6125B

.

# :i. Pr:essure.1Psig*

## 290~ " " GGA

## ~50 :,' ,).;**,~.** ' ,'::;'

. .;.\: .',

.. ,' " ANALYTICAL 'NFORMArJON: .'.

. Product:Cpde: 780499

.. METHOD:

### rhl!~tahdard was ..

### aP~iyZed,.~~ordin~ k:; 

### Ef:'A.•.

### :tr.'~ab~r;

# . Protocol for Assay'and Certification

## of Gl!I$l!)ous Callbratton Standards: ,Procedure G,!:·{Septembei'1997).
. " ., .. ", ' "
. ANALYZEqtYLlNDER: '. '::'

. "**Componenf~,'** Certified COncentration Analytical Accuracy'"**,.~,** .**:'~** , ' 

## _.. (**~** .:", .(.:. " 

### , . Carbon**MO~pxide**'.


### .

## 45704~ 

# ", "1i. BaranGe
-**Nttrp9~f{** .**~'.** i**~ .~'':;'.** **:.~~;I·;{14:' :i~".~~,~,**  ..**~~;~~.~ BEE~R~NCE**  STANDARD**TypelSRM~ample** #
.

, GMIS ( Traceable to SRM # 2638a )

INSTRLJMENTATION Instrument!M9delfSerial 

### # ", . .**~ ~.**  Rc;>semount:680A CO· U-1003870 Cylinder!.,
SG9138239BAL

Last Oate Callbrateg


### 01/f8!o7 +/-1%

Concentration
4970 ppm COIN2

Analytical MethOd

i

.Non-dispersive 

### Infrared

Analyst 

# 470'

# !**B~'n** P. Moore This report states 

### accurately the 

### results of

### the Investigation made 

### upon the _ISubmitted to the 

### analytical laboratory. Every effort has 

### been made to detennlne objectively the Information requested. However. In connection with thIs 

### report. 

### National Specialty Gases 

### shan have no liabHity in excess of established charge for this ServIce. Assayed at National Specialty Gases, 630 

### United Drive, Durham, NC 

### 2n1.3 (919) 

### 544-3772 ·00 not use this standard when cylinder pressure Is below 150 pslg. ··Analytlcal accuracy Includes typical known error sources whIch, at least. include precIsion ofthe analyticlilllnwumenl (P. O. Bo)( 12013 Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709 phone 919/544-3772


## CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSfS: EPA PROTOCOL GAS MIXTURE Customer: Nationa! Welders. Raleigh. NC Reference # 88-105959 

# -., NSG PO# 5?85931 Certification Date: 09/O6{O6 Expiration Date: 09/06/09 Cyfinder# CC18971 Pressure, pslg* 1700 CGA350 

### ANALYTICAL INFORMATION Product Code: 780492 METHOO: This sl&ndard was anatyzed according to EPA Traceability**P~tooOllor** Assay anel Certification atGaseous CaHbratlonSlandaros: Procedure Gt (September 1991) ANAlYZED CYLINDER CQmponents Carbon Monoxide Balance

. Nitrogen

'"**~':** . ,

...**~.-** ..... REEERE$ice STANDARP Type/SRM Sample # GMIS (Traceable to SRM #I 2639A )

INSTRUMENTATION InstrumenVModellSerlal # Rosemount S80A CO U·100387Q Certified Concentration 8875 ppm

Cylinder #

CC193754

Last Date Calibrated 08/11/06 Analytical Accuracy** +/-1%

Concentration 9770 ppm CO/N2

Analytjcal Method Non-dispersive Infrared

Analyst:

# ~---_. Neal Bernard**----~------------------------------** This report states accurately the results ofthe investigationmade upon the material submitted to the analytical laboratory. Every effort has been made to determine obJectively the Information requested. However, in connection with this report, Natronal SpeCialty Gasas shall have no liability In excess of established charge for this selVlce. Assayed at Nalional Specialty Gases, 630 United Drive, Durham, NO 27713 (919) 544-3772 *00 not use !his sl&ndard when cylincler pressure Is below 150 pslg.

....

Analytlcal accuracy includes typical known error sources which. at least. Include precision ofthe analytical Instrument. NSG020149L · .. ·**~..** :'.

',:**~':~.** · ,.

, 

### ......

# c. ·.1· .. 

## APPENP[XB CALIBRATION 

## DATA , I

### , i"


## ( ,'\ 

# .

## Method 20 

## Interference Check

Date: 1/2/2004 Analyst: JeffThompson Analyzer Type: California Analytical 200 Gas Monitored: 02 Analyzer Serial Number: 1N03013 Analyzer Span: 0-25% TRC Number 3 

### Linearity Check Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Reading Difference % Difference Zero Gas 

# - N2 0.0 0.04 0.038 0.152 Mid-level Gas XC030412 O2 11.1 11.025 -0.075 -0.3 High-Level Gas CC012605 O2 20.64 20.565 -0.075 -0.3


### Interference Test· Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Reading Difference % Difference CO (500

### ±50 ppm) 

### AAL21337 CO 601 0.039 0.039 0.156 S02 (200

### ±20 ppm) ALM039889 S02 900.7 NOx It NOx 443.6 0.003 0.003 0.012 C02 (10.0 

### + 1%) 

# .. CO2 18.48 (NOx, S02, & C02 combined in one cylinder) Sum ofthe 

### % Difference must be 

### :5 2% of Span SUMI 0.012 All testing Is In accordance with USEPA CFR 40, Part 60, Appendix A. Method 20.

For calculations atrue zero Is assumed



# TRC TRC Environmental COrporation

## Method 20 Interference Check

Date: 1/2/2004 Analyst: Jeff Thompson Analyzer Type: California Analytical 200 Gas Monitored: CO2 Analyzer Serial Number: 1N03013 Analyzer Span: 0-20% TRC Number 3 

### Linearity Check Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Zero Gas 

# . N2 0.0 Mid-Level Gas XC030412 CO2 9.04 High-Level Gas CC012605 CO2 17.39



# . Interference Test Cylinder Number Gas Concentration CO (500 

## ±50 ppm) AAL21337 CO 601 S02 (200

## ±20 ppm) XC028891 S02 219.5 NOx XC030645 NOx 215.2 Sum of the % Difference must be 

### =:. 2% of Span

All testing is in accordance with USEPA CFR 40, Part 60, AppendiX A. Method 20

. • For calculations a true zero Is assumed Reading Difference 0.01 0.007 9.029 -0.011 17.388 -0.002

Reading Difference

0.001 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 SUMI



# TRC TRC Environmental Corporation % Difference 0.035 -0.055 -0.01

% Difference 0.005 0.015 0.015 0.007



### ,/.
,.



# c. Method 20 

## Interference Check

Date: 1/5/2004 Analyst: JeffThompson Analyzer Type : API200AH Gas Monitored: NOx Analyzer Serial Number: 458 Analyzer Span: 0-100ppm TRCNumber 5 

### Linearity Check Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Reading Zero Gas 

# - N2 0.0 0.15 Low-Level Gas XC023711 NOx 23.44 22.67 Mid-Level Gas XC030412 NOx 55.2 55.95 High-Level Gas CC012605 NOx 84.3 84.6



# . Interference Test Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Reading· CO (500 .t50 ppm) AAL21337 CO 601 0.81 S02 (200.t 20 ppm) XC028891 S02 219.5 0.55 02 (20.9 

### + 1%) CC012605 02lC02 20.64 0.31 C02 (10.0 

### + 1%) II 

### " 17.39 Sum of the % Difference must be**~** 2% of Span

All testing Is In accordance with USEPA CFR 40, Pari 60. Appendix A. Method 20• • Forcalculations atrue zero Is assumed SUM Is absolute value of the pecen! difference



# TRC Difference 0.15 -0.77 0.75 0.3

. Difference 0.81 0.55 0.31
SUMI

TRC Environmental Corporation % Difference 0.15 -0.77 0.75 0.3

% Difference 0.81 0.55 0.31
1.67

## Method 20 Interference Check

Date: 101712005 Analyst: Wayne D. Abbott Analyzer Type: Thermo Environmental-Model 48 Gas Monitored: CO Analyzer Serial Number: 48-18572-179 Analyzer Span: 0-100 TRC Number 5 

### Linearity Check Cylinder Number Gas Concentration Zero Gas N2 0.0 Low-Level Gas XC028168 CO 29.8 Mid-Level Gas XC031970 CO 64.17 High-Level Gas CC10965 CO 88.9



# . Interference Test Cylinder Number Gas Concentration O2 (20.9 :!J%) CC28790 O2 20.9 CO2 (10.0::t 1%) 

### " CO2 17.83 S02 (200 ::t 20 ppm) XC027601 S02 223.0 NOx XC016139 NOx 224 Sum ofthe % Difference must be 

### .5. 2% of Span Al1 testing Is In accordance with USEPA CFR 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Method 20, • For calculations a true zero Is assumed Reading Difference % Difference 0.01 0.01 0.01 28.63 -1.21 -1.21 62.7-1 -1.46 -1.46 88.4 -0.5 -0.5

Reading Difference % Difference

(02and CO2 readings combined) -0.07 -0.07 -0.07 -0.03 -0.03 -0.03

0.1 0.1 0.1 SUMI 0



# TRC TRC Environmental CorporationMARTA Perry Catalyst time 

### & Temp 

### 04/28/09 tOLE TEMPS RUN # 1 CAT#2 TIME PRE POST 

### 6:30PM 386 430 6:35PM 374 424 6:40PM 375 430 6:45PM 383 438 6:50PM 387 442 6:55PM 387 447 7:0·0PM 393 448 7:05PM 386 426 7:10PM 376 425.
1DLE TEMPS RUN#2CAT#3 TIME PRE POST 

### 8:15PM 420 455 8:20PM 425 456 8:25PM 408 439 8:30PM 415 451 8:35PM 425 457 8:40PM 427 467 IDLE TEMPS RUN#3CAT#1 TIME PRE POST 

### 9:15PM 387 410 9:20PM 391 423 9:25PM 382 415 9:30PM 388 410 9:35PM 386 408 9:40PM 382 410 LOADED TEMPS RUN # 1 CAT # 1 TIME PRE POST 

### 10:50PM 545 595 11:00PM 516 563 11:10PM 522 567 11 :20PM 522 566 11:30PM 529 568 11:40PM 505 553

LOADED TEMPS RUN#2 CAT#3 TIME PRE 

### 12:02AM 545 12:10AM 538 12:20AM 580 12:30AM 543 12:40AM 552 12:50AM 546 01:00AM 517 POST 

### 575 580 619 573 640 590 607{. 

# SMITH ALDRIDGE, . 

# INC. Environmental Consultants 

### May 26, 2009 

## Mr. Ross 

## Winne AirProtection Branch GeorgiaEnvironmental Protection Division Department ofNatural Resources 4244 International Parkway Suite 120 Atlanta, Georgia 30354 

# RECEIVED MAY 272009 

# ISMP

Subject: MARTA

- Perry Boulevard CompressedNatural Gas Fueling Facility Perry Boulevard

- Fulton County, Georgia NOx and CO Performance Testing Results Dear Mr. Winne: On behalf of Atlanta Gas Light Company, Smith Aldridge, Inc. is submitting two (2) copies ofthe performance testing reports (along with the appropriate test report summary forms) for Natural Gas Compressor Engine #1, Engine #2, and Engine #3 atthe MARTA

- Perry Boulevard Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility conducted on April 28-29, 2009. This testing was conducted as part of conforming to the provisions of Consent OrderNo. EPD-AQC-6032. The testing followed the procedures detailed in the test protocol developed and submitted to 

### Georgia EPD in advance ofthe test program. One sixty-minute measurement ofthe emission rate of NOx 

### and CO was determined at 

### peak load for each Natural Gas Compressor Engine #1 and Engine #3 (Run 

### ID Ul-M and U3-M). One thirty-minute measurement ofthe emission rate ofNO x 

### and CO was also determined at idle for each of the three engines (Run

## ID U1-I, U2·I, and U3-I). If you have any questions or need any additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me at404-255-0928 (ext 112) orat csmith@smithaldridge.com. Sincerely,

# crb~.Ph.D. President Enclosure: Two Copies

- Testing Report GAEPD TestReport Summary Forms
cc: Terry Ryland

- AGL Nicole Miles

- AGL

MAII-ING ADDRESS: P.D.Box 420495 • ATI-ANTA, GEORGIA 30342 6000 LAKE F'ORREST DRIVE' SUITE 3BS • ATI-ANTA, GEORGIA 30328 DF"F"ICE: 404.255.0928 • F'AX: 404.2S5.0948 • WWW.SMITHAI-ORIOCilE.COM