alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36152-36153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.

[[Page 36153]]

    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: July 17, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 am to 12:30 pm.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: John R. Lymangrover, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, NIAMS, Natcher Bldg., 
Room 5As25N, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-4952.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 31, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-14335 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.209 How is the application processed? The Commandant (CG-5P), in cooperation with MARAD, processes each application and MARAD publishes the notice of application under 33 U.S.C. 1504(c) in the Federal Register. Upon publication of a notice of application, the Commandant (CG-5P) ensures delivery of copies of the application to— ( a ) Each Federal agency with jurisdiction over any aspect of ownership, construction, or operation of deepwater ports. A complete listing of the Federal agencies involved with deepwater port licensing is outlined in the Deepwater Port Interagency MOU available at the following hyperlink: *https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/DCO%20Documents/5p/5ps/Operating%20and%20Environmental%20Standards/OES-2/DWP/dwp_white_house_task_force_energy_streamlining.pdf?ver=2017-07-26-102702-223*
( b ) Each Adjacent Coastal State, including relevant State and tribal agencies in those Adjacent Coastal States.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39176, July 1, 2013; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58279, Sept. 18, 2020 ]
EXHIBIT 13.1

                          CERTIFICATION OF NICK DEMARE

                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






                                      -112-

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hilton Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the year ending May 31,  2003,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Nick DeMare,  Interim
President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  (Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief
Financial Officer) of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.



/s/  Nick DeMare
------------------------------
Nick DeMare,
Interim President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


                                      -113-
<PAGE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September 30 , 2009 | /s/ Jacqulyn B. Wine                            |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                            | Jacqulyn B. Wine                                |
|                            | Secretary and Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

August 10, 2011

0810

Order 

August 10, 2011

143028

ESTATE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143028

COA: 291989

Oakland CC: 2004-057182-CC

OAKLAND COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION,

Defendant-Third-Party/

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

THOMPSON-McCULLY COMPANY, a/k/a

THOMPSON-McCULLY COMPANY, L.L.C.,

Third-Party Defendant/

Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

OAKLAND EXCAVATING COMPANY,

OWEN TREE SERVICE, and ACKLEY

CONSTRUCTION,

Third-Party Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTH ERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.

FILED By > m t D.c.

JdL 8 ï 2222

ANGELA E. NOBLE

CLERK U S DISTL CT s. D. oF it-k. - MIAMi

IN RE SEALED INDICTM ENT

M OTION TO- NEAL

by and tllrough its tmdersigned attom ey, respectfully

requests that the lndictment and al1 attachm ents thereto, and this M otion, and any related Orders

and proceedings be SEALED tmtil further order of this court, excepting the United States

The United States of Am erica,

Atlom ey's Ofûce, Hom eland Security lnvestigations, the Federal Blzreau of lnvestigation, and the

U.S. Fish & W ildlife Service - Offke of Law Enforcement, whieh m ay obtain eopies of the sealed

docllm ents for official pup oses, or any other necessary cause, for the reason that the m aterials

relate to atl on-going international investigation, and public disclosure m ay permit the targets of

the investigation to avoid travel to jtuisdictions in which they may be arrested and extradited to

the United States, avoid kavel to or through the United States, destroy or conceal probative

evidence of their eriminal condud and the integrity of the ongoing investigation might be

compronzised should lcnowledge of the criminal investigation becom e public.

Respectfully subm itted,

JuykN ANTONIO GONZALEZ

TED STA T

By: , -'

om as A . W tts-FitzG r d

Xssistant Uzlited States Atto ey

Florida Bar No. 0273538

99 N .E. 4th Street

M inm i, FL 33132

Thomas.waûs-ftzgerald@usdoj.gov

22-20340-CR-WILLIAMS/MCALILEY

Case 1:22-cr-20340-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/29/2022 Page 1 of 1
Submitted on record and briefs November 23,

judgment of dismissal reversed and remanded December 21, 1994

#### STATE ex rel James Scott HOPKINS, *Appellant, v.*Brian BEMUS, Program Manager, Classification and Transfer Div., Department of Corrections, *Respondent.*

(93C12479; CA A84137)

887 P2d 350

James Scott Hopkins filed the briefs *pro se.*

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Pamela G. Wood, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Landau, Judges.

WARREN, P. J.

*28WARREN, P. J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for an alternative writ of mandamus. We reverse and remand.

Petitioner, an inmate, sought an alternative writ of mandamus to compel defendant, an official of the Oregon Department of Corrections, to award him earned time credit. The trial court allowed the petition, ordered that the writ issue, ordered the court administrator to serve the writ on defendant, and set a date for hearing. However, the court administrator did not serve the writ. After petitioner mailed a signed copy of the writ and summons to counsel for defendant, counsel wrote to petitioner and said that “ORS 34.130(1) requires personal service of the original writ of mandamus on the named defendant.” Counsel informed petitioner that defendant had not been personally served. Defendant did not appear at the show cause hearing.

Petitioner filed a petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus. ORS 34.180. Defendant filed a special appearance and moved to quash service, arguing that, because he had not been personally served, the trial court lacked jurisdiction and the petition for peremptory writ should be denied. The trial court allowed the motion. Later, it entered a judgment dismissing the petition.

Petitioner appeals from that judgment, contending that service was adequate. We understand defendant concedes that the trial court erred in dismissing the action on the grounds of improper service. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

Judgment of dismissal reversed and remanded.
#### § 334.690 [Reserved]
§ 338.2 Activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. ( a ) Generally, fill activities conducted by the Corps for operations and maintenance of existing Civil Works water resource and navigation projects are routine and have little, if any, potential for significant degradation of the environment. District engineers are encouraged to develop general authorizations in accordance with section 404 of the CWA and 104 of the ODA following the procedures of § 337.5 of this chapter for categories of such routine activities. The general authorization should satisfy all compliance requirements including water quality certifications and, if applicable, coastal zone consistency determinations. For activities which are not conducive to the development of general authorizations or are more appropriately evaluated on an individual basis, the following procedures should be followed.
( b ) A public notice should be issued using the procedures § 337.1 of this chapter.
( c ) Water quality certifications should be requested and, if applicable, coastal zone consistency determinations should be provided using the procedures of § 336.1(b) (8) and (9) of this chapter.
( d ) The discharge site should be specified through the application of the section 404(b)(1) guidelines.
( e ) The procedures of 40 CFR part 230 should be used to determine the NEPA compliance requirements.
( f ) The factors of § 336.1(c) of this chapter should be followed when evaluating fill activities.
( g ) Upon completion of all required coordination and after receipt of the necessary state certifications, the district engineer should prepare an SOF in accordance with § 337.6.
[53 FR 14920, Apr. 26, 1988]
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert L. Saxton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alliance Gaming Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d 15(e) for the registrant and have:

                                                a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)     disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

a)     all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

                                                b)    any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 8, 2004
|   |   | /s/ Robert L. Saxton                                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Robert L. Saxton                                      |
|   |   | Executive President, Treasurer and Chief Financial    |
|   |   | Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer) |

 

----
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 25, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 130194(59)(68) Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

THE GREATER BIBLE WAY TEMPLE OF JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 130194 v COA: 250863 Jackson CC: 01-003614-AS CITY OF JACKSON, JACKSON PLANNING COMMISSION, and JACKSON CITY COUNCIL, Defendants-Appellants.

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Michigan Municipal League for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered and it is
GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 25, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 32(f)




                                  CERTIFICATION

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Savannah
Electric and Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, we, the
undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our
individual knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Savannah Electric and Power Company
     for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, which this statement accompanies,
     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Savannah
     Electric and Power Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly
     presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of Savannah Electric and Power Company.



                                 /s/A. R. James
                                   A. R. James
                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                               /s/Kirby R. Willis
                                 Kirby R. Willis
               Vice President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
                        and Assistant Corporate Secretary

Date:  November 3, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-22671-CIV-ALTONAGA/Torres

DELIO BATISTA, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Second Motion for Extension of 

Discovery Deadline Nunc Pro Tunc [ECF No. 60], filed May 16, 2023. Local Rule 7.1(a)(3) of 

the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida provides:

Prior to filing any motion in a civil case, . . . counsel for the movant shall confer 

(orally or in writing), or make reasonable effort to confer (orally or in writing), or 

make reasonable effort to confer (orally or in writing), with all parties or nonparties who may be affected by the relief sought in the motion in a good faith 

effort to resolve by agreement the issues to be raised in the motion. . . . At the 

end of the motion, and above the signature block, counsel for the moving party 

shall certify [in accordance herewith.]

(alterations and emphasis added). The Rule further states that “[f]ailure to comply . . . may be 

cause for the Court to grant or deny the motion and impose on counsel an appropriate sanction . . 

. .” Id. (alterations added). 

According to the Motion, the “undersigned counsel’s office conferred with defense 

counsel’s office via email on May 12, 2023, regarding the relief requested in this Motion.” (Mot. 

2). From this statement, it is unclear what Defendants’ position is on the Motion. 

Therefore, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [ECF No. 60] is DENIED WITHOUT 

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2023 Page 1 of 2
CASE NO. 22-22671-CIV-ALTONAGA

2

PREJUDICE. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 16th day of May, 2023.

 _______________________________________

 CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2023 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
24





POWER
OF ATTORNEY





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Act, this registration statement has been
signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Pengfei Liu
and Marco Hon Wai Ku, and each of them individually, his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him or her and his or her name, place and stead, in any and
all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective
amendments) to this registration statement, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the SEC,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their
or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.





SIGNATURE
                      
                      TITLE
                      
                      DATE/s/ Pengfei Liu
                      
                      Chief
      Executive Officer, Secretary & Director
                      
                      3/20/09Pengfei
      Liu/s/ Marco Hon Wai Ku
                      
                      Chief
      Financial Officer
                      
                      3/20/09Marco
      Hon Wai Ku/s/ Weipeng Liu
                      
                      Director
                      
                      3/20/09Weipeng
      Liu/s/ Xiaochuan Li
                      
                      Independent
      Director
                      
                      3/20/09Xiaochuan
      Li/s/ Changhu Xue
                      
                      Independent
      Director
                      
                      3/20/09Changhu
      Xue/s/ Honkau Wan
                      
                      Independent
      Director
                      
                      3/20/09Honkau
      Wan
window.onload = function() {
  adjustAreas();
	
  document.getElementById('edit-term-node-tid-depth--level-0').addEventListener('change',adjustAreas);
	
  function adjustAreas () {
    if (document.getElementById('edit-term-node-tid-depth--level-1') != null) {
      document.getElementById('edit-term-node-tid-depth--level-1').setAttribute('required','');
      document.getElementById('edit-term-node-tid-depth--level-1').firstChild.setAttribute('value','');
      if (document.getElementById('edit-term-node-tid-depth--level-1').childNodes.length == 2) {
        document.getElementById('edit-term-node-tid-depth--level-1').selectedIndex = 1;
      }
    }
  }
};