alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 334.920 Pacific Ocean off the east coast of San Clemente Island, Calif.; naval restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The waters of the Pacific Ocean within an area extending easterly from the east coast of San Clemente Island, California, described as follows: The northerly boundary to be a continuation, to seaward of the existing southerly boundary of the restricted anchorage area, as described in 110.218 of this chapter, to latitude 33°00.3′ N., longitude 118°31.1′ W.; thence to latitude 32°58.6′ N., longitude 118°30.0′ W.; thence to latitude 32°57.9′ N., longitude 118°31.3′ W on the shoreline; thence northerly along the shoreline to the point of beginning.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) No person or vessels, other than Naval Ordnance Test Station craft, and those cleared for entry by the Naval Ordnance Test Station, shall enter the area at any time except in an emergency, proceeding with extreme caution.
( 2 ) Dredging, dragging, seining or other fishing operations within these boundaries are prohibited.
( 3 ) No seaplanes, other than those approved for entry by Naval Ordnance Test Station, may enter the area.
( 4 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by security personnel attached to the U.S. Naval Ordnance Test Station, China Lake, California, and by such agencies as may be designated by the Commandant, Eleventh Naval District, San Diego, California.
[23 FR 2098, Mar. 29, 1958, as amended at 48 FR 6708, Feb. 15, 1983; 48 FR 8273, Feb. 28, 1983. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17556, Apr. 10, 1997]
DEAN HELLER                                 Filed # C13333-93
Secretary of State                          Dec 21 2004
204 North Carson Street, Suite 1            In the Officer of
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299                 Dean Heller
(775) 684 5708                              Dean Heller Secretary of State
Website: secretaryofstate.biz

-----------------------------------
      Certificate of Amendment
(PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 and 78.390)
-----------------------------------

              Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                         For Nevada Profit Corporations
          (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)

1. Name of corporation:
International Star, Inc.

2. The  articles  have been  amended as follows  (provide  article  numbers,  if
available):

Article the Fourth is amended to read as follows:

"The total  authorized  capital stock of the corporation  shall be Seven Hundred
Eighty  Million  (780,000,000)  shares of $.001 par value Common  Stock,  all of
which  shall be  entitled  to voting  power  when  issued,  and  Twenty  Million
(20,000,000) shares of undesignated  preferred stock. The Board of Directors may
issue authorized  shares of common and preferred stock from time to time without
action by the  shareholders,  at such  consideration as may from time to time be
set by the Board of  Directors.  The Board of Directors may issue such shares of
common  and  preferred  stock in one or more  series,  at such price and in such
number of each series with such voting powers,  designations,  preferences,  and
rights  or  qualifications  or  restrictions  thereof  as shall be stated in the
resolution or resolutions adopted by them."

3.  The  vote by  which  the  stockholders  holding  shares  in the  corporation
entitling  them to  exercise at least a majority  of the voting  power,  or such
greater  proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series,  or as may be required by the provisions of the * articles
of  incorporation  have voted in favor of the amendment is:  Fifty-four  percent
(53.88)

4. Effective date of filing (optional): 12/24/04
                 (must not no later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)

5. Officer Signature (required): /s/ROBERT HAWKINS President/CEO
                                 --------------------------------

* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative
or other  right  given to any class or series of  outstanding  shares,  then the
amendment  must be approved by the vote,  in  addition to the  affirmative  vote
otherwise  required,  of the  holders of shares  representing  a majority of the
voting power of each class or series  affected by the  amendment  regardless  of
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure of include any of the above information and submit the proper
fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.507 Security Zone; Chesapeake Bay, between Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD. ( a ) *Definitions.* The “Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region” means the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region to act on his or her behalf.
( b ) *Location.* The following area is a security zone: All waters of the Chesapeake Bay, from the surface to the bottom, within 250 yards north of the north (westbound) span of the William P. Lane Jr. Memorial Bridge, and 250 yards south of the south (eastbound) span of the William P. Lane Jr. Memorial Bridge, from the western shore at Sandy Point to the eastern shore at Kent Island, Maryland.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations governing security zones found in § 165.33 of this part.
( 2 ) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region.
( 3 ) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the security zone must first request authorization from the Captain of the Port, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region seek permission to transit the area. The Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region can be contacted at telephone number (410) 576-2693. The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can be contacted on VHF Marine Band Radio, VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course while within the zone.
( d ) *Enforcement.* The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
( e ) *Enforcement period.* This section will be enforced annually on the second Sunday in November from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m., and if necessary due to inclement weather, on the third Sunday in November from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m.
[USCG-2014-0296, 79 FR 49690, Aug. 22, 2014, as amended by USCG-2016-0060, 81 FR 38594, June 14, 2016]
#### INLAND FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CHAMPION CIGARETTE VENDING COMPANY, a corporation, and Guy Moss, Appellees.

No. 7674.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 13, 1958.

Decided Oct. 16, 1958.

Roy S. Samms, Jr., Charleston, W. Va. (Pettigrew, Samms & Pettigrew, Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellant.

No oral argument or brief for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge, and BARKSDALE and BRYAN, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the view that another citizen of West Virginia was indispensable as a party plaintiff, this diversity suit of the appellant Inland Finance Company, an Iowa corporation, against two citizens of West Virginia was dismissed. In this the District Court erred, for the appellant is asserting a cause of action exclusively its own, not one possessed jointly with the absent party, the firm of Michael, Michael and Jackson.

This firm was the sole distributor and agent in Charleston for selling the cigarette vending machines manufactured by Fawn Engineering Corporation Products. It sold them under conditional sales contracts. These were financed through the *244appellant, to whom for that purpose the contracts were assigned by the Michael firm.

In competition with Michael in this business was the defendant Champion Cigarette Vending Company, whose president, Guy Moss, was the other defendant. Champion handled other types of cigarette vending machines, leasing them to retail stores for a compensation based on sales. The complaint charges that these defendants have engaged, and are now engaging, in wrongful and unlawful tactics to persuade the conditional vendees of the Fawn machines, already financed by the plaintiff, to discontinue the use of those units and refuse to perform their purchase contracts, all to the severe damage of the plaintiff. Injunc-tive relief with damages is sought.

 On the face of the pleadings, we think, the plaintiff asserts an interest belonging wholly and solely to itself— an interest apart from, and not shared with, Michael, Michael and Jackson. It consists of appellant’s investment in the contracts. For the protection and preservation of that interest, the appellant may sue to prevent impairment of the contracts, as well as to recover for such injury to them as may have already been caused by the defendants’ conduct. This is true whether the plaintiff has retained, or has released, recourse upon the contracts against the distributor-agent as assignor.

The assignor, too, may perhaps have an action against the defendants, but that right does not embrace, merge or preclude the plaintiff’s cause of action, a right peculiar to the plaintiff by virtue of its property in the contracts. Nor would any right of action of the distributor-agent be prejudiced by the outcome of the appellant’s suit. Gramatan-Sullivan, Inc., v. Koslow, 2 Cir., 1957, 240 F.2d 523, 524, certiorari denied 353 U.S. 958, 77 S.Ct. 864, 1 L.Ed.2d 909; and see generally, Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co., 1909, 215 U.S. 33, 49, 30 S.Ct. 10, 54 L.Ed. 80.

The order of the trial court must be vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
**Exhibit 31(f)2**

**SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 

I, Michael W. Southern, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southern Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 7, 2007

/s/Michael W. Southern

Michael W. Southern

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7626
WILLIAM W. WILKINS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR SARAF, MD; L. GARRIS, RN; DANE HOWELL, NP, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-243-AM) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William W. Wilkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's complaint was dismissed without prejudice to his right to file a proper claim alleging facts that show specific injury to himself. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); FED . R. C IV . P. 54(b). Because Appellant may be able to save this action by amending his complaint, the dismissal order which Appellant seeks to appeal is not an appealable final order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 401.58 Pleasure craft scheduling. ( a ) The transit of pleasure craft shall be scheduled by the traffic controller or the officer in charge of a lock and may be delayed so as to avoid interference with other vessels; and
( b ) Every pleasure craft seeking to transit Canadian Locks shall first make a reservation on the Seaway website.
[70 FR 12972, Mar. 17, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 2620, Jan. 22, 2007; 73 FR 9954, Feb. 25, 2008; 82 FR 12420, Mar. 3, 2017; 84 FR 8984, Mar. 13, 2019; 87 FR 12591, Mar. 7, 2022]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated May 12, 1999, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on May 25, 1999, (64 FR 28214), Noramco, Inc., 1400 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601, made application to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below: Drug
ScheduleCodeine (9050)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIThebaine (9333)
II
 The firm plans to support its other manufacturing facility with manufacturing and analytical testing. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Noramco, Inc. to manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Noramco, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigations included inspection and testing of the company's physical 
                    ( print page 36467)
                    security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed above is granted. Dated: May 26, 2000. John H. King, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 00-14477  Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
# Detail
#### LUTHER E. MANSFIELD, Respondent, *v.*CHARLES H. KERNER AND ANOTHER, APPELLANTS.

*Contract—specificaMons annexed to*— *when compliance with must he proved —Answer*— *allegations of—when insufficient as evidence ftrr plaintiff.*

This action was brought to recover for work performed in erecting an elevator, “ as per specifications annexed to the written contract.” The answer alleged that the elevator was to be constructed “ in accordance with certain drawings and specifications,” and then set forth certain of the requirements thereof. Upon the trial the plaintiff did not prove the contract and specifications, but read a portion of the answer, referring, in general terms, to the contract, and declared that this was the agreement which he accepted, and he was allowed to recover thereon. *Held,*that this was error; that he should have been compelled to prove, the contract and specifications, and compliance therewith.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered, upon the verdict of a jury.

*George H.*Forster, for the appellants.

*Frank*Reynolds, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.1089 Manitowoc River. ( a ) The draws of the Eighth Street bridge, mile 0.29, and Tenth Street bridge, mile o.43, both at Manitowoc, shall open on signal except that: ( 1 ) From April 1 through October 31, Monday through Friday, the bridges need not open from 6:50 a.m. to 7 a.m., 7:50 a.m. to 8 a.m., 11:55 a.m. to 12:10 p.m., and 12:45 p.m. to 1 p.m., except federal holidays. From 10:30 p.m. to 4:30 a.m. the draws shall open on signal if at least a 6 hour advance notice is given.
( 2 ) From November 1 through March 31 the draws shall open on signal if at least a 12 hour advance notice is given.
( 3 ) The opening signals for these bridges are: ( i ) Eighth Street—one prolonged blast followed by one short blast.
( ii ) Tenth Street—two short blasts followed by one prolonged blast.
( 4 ) When signal is given by car ferry or other large vessel to pass either of the two bridges, the remaining bridge shall open promptly so that such vessels shall not be held between the two bridges.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGD09-01-001, 66 FR 13434, Mar. 6, 2001, as amended by USCG-2015-0132, 80 FR 24816, May 1, 2015]
Dulce Figueroa DBA Perfect Landscaping

Account Holder: Orlando Ferro, Yerro Ferro, Dulce Figueroa

Account Signer(s): Orlando Ferro, Yerro Ferro, Dulce Figueroa

Bank: Popular Bank

Account #: 3145

Account Type: Popular Prestige Checking

Opened: 2/27/2007

Statements Rec'd: 12/29/2017 - 8/10/2022

Bank Accounts

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
§ 5.7 Administration, specific authorizations. ( a ) The Commandant may delegate any authority vested in him or her by the Auxiliary Act or by this part to personnel of the Coast Guard and members of the Auxiliary in the manner and to the extent as the Commandant deems necessary or appropriate for the functioning, organization, and internal administration of the Auxiliary.
( b ) The Commandant has authorized Auxiliary Unit Leaders to take the following actions in furtherance of the authorized missions of the Auxiliary. This is not an exclusive list— ( 1 ) Acquire, own, hold, use, and dispose of vessels, aircraft, motorized vehicles, trailers, radio stations, electronic equipment and other items of tangible, personal property;
( 2 ) Accept ownership, custody, or use of vessels, boats, aircraft, radio stations, motorized vehicles, trailers, electronic equipment, and other tangible property from the Coast Guard, from other Federal, State, or municipal agencies, or from private or non-profit groups;
( 3 ) Create and manage bank accounts, monies, stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments;
( 4 ) Accept and use gifts, grants, legacies, and bequests;
( 5 ) Accept funds, materials, services, and the use of facilities from public and private entities and Federal, State, or municipal agencies;
( 6 ) Enter into licenses, leases, contracts, memoranda of agreement, or understanding, and other agreements; and
( 7 ) Enter into cooperative agreements and grant agreements with the Coast Guard and other Federal, State, or municipal agencies.
( c ) The national board of the Auxiliary may form a corporation under State law and Coast Guard policy to manage the Auxiliary's fiscal affairs. The national corporation may— ( 1 ) Hold copyrights, trademarks, and titles to Auxiliary property;
( 2 ) Contract with the Coast Guard and other Federal, State, and municipal agencies to procure such goods and services;
( 3 ) Receive grants, gifts, and other items on behalf of the Auxiliary; and
( 4 ) Conduct other activities as may be authorized by the Commandant.
( d ) An Auxiliary district or region may form a corporation under State law and Coast Guard policy.
Case 1:22-cv-22343-KMM   Document 117-3   Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2023   Page 1 of 1