alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Steven A. Horowitz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Genio Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
   the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
   of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: January 16, 2007                 By: /s/ Steven A. Horowitz
                                           ----------------------
                                           Steven A. Horowitz
                                           CEO and principal executive officer
EXHIBIT 12.3

                            S.E.CLARK & COMPANY, P.C.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Member: S.E.C. Practice Section of the American Institute of
                          Certified Public Accountants



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


As independent auditors, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our reports dated
January 14, 2000, in the Amendment A to Form 10-KSB for NuPro  Innovations  Inc.
which includes the financial statements of NuPro Innovations Inc. (fka TrucTech,
Inc.)  for the  periods  ended  November  30,  1999 and  1998  and the  separate
financial  statements of NuPro  Innovations Inc. for the year ended November 30,
1998.


/s/ S.E.CLARK & COMPANY, P.C.

Tucson, Arizona
November 9, 2000




          Member: National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  744 N. Country Club Road, Tucson, AZ 85716 (520) 323-7774 Fax (520) 323-8174
                      seclarkcpa@aol.com www.seclarkco.com
§ 5.44 Auxiliary facility decal. ( a ) *Description.* The Auxiliary facility decal is composed of two parts. The upper part is a conventional white shield with a medium blue (Coast Guard blue) Coast Guard Auxiliary emblem centered on a broad diagonal red (Coast Guard red) slash which is at a 70 degree angle, rising toward the viewer's right. The red (Coast Guard red) slash is followed, on the viewer's left, by two narrow, parallel stripes—first a white stripe, and then a medium blue (Coast Guard blue) stripe. The entire design is centered on the shield. The lower part displays two laterally radiating wreath branches centered immediately beneath the shield. A broad diagonal red (Coast Guard red) slash, which is at a 70 degree angle, rising toward the viewer's right and followed, on the viewer's left, by two narrow, parallel stripes, first a white stripe and then a medium blue (Coast Guard blue) stripe, is displayed on the wreath's right-hand branch.
( b ) *Display.* Vessels, aircraft, motorized vehicles, trailers, radio stations and other equipment accepted for use by the Coast Guard must display the Auxiliary facility decal as authorized in the Auxiliary Operations Policy Manual referenced in § 5.9. ( 1 ) On vessels, the decal must be displayed on the port side of the vessel so as to be visible by another vessel when meeting such vessel in a port-to-port situation.
( 2 ) On aircraft, the decal must be displayed on the pilot's side of the forward half of the aircraft.
( 3 ) On radio facilities, the miniature decal must be displayed on the radio, and the full-size decal must be displayed on the exterior or interior of the building or trailer in which the radio is housed, or, in the case of mobile radios, on any legal place on the motor vehicle in which the radio is contained.
( 4 ) On motorized vehicles, trailers and other equipment, the decal must be displayed on a clearly visible exterior location.
§ 334.430 Neuse River and tributaries at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina; restricted area and danger zone. ( a ) *The restricted area.* That portion of Neuse River within 500 feet of the shore along the reservation of the Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina, extending from the mouth of Hancock Creek to a point approximately 6,800 feet west of the mouth of Slocum Creek, and all waters of Hancock and Slocum Creeks and their tributaries within the boundaries of the reservation.
( b ) *The danger zone.* The waters within an area beginning at latitude 34.923425° N, longitude −76.853222° W; thence northeasterly across Hancock Creek to latitude 34.925258° N, longitude −76.849864° W; continuing northeasterly to latitude 34.933382° N, longitude −76.835081° W; thence northwesterly to the Neuse River shoreline at latitude 34.936986° N, longitude −76.841197° W, continuing northwesterly to latitude 34.943275° N, longitude −76.852169° W; thence southwesterly along the shorelines to latitude 34.935111° N, longitude −76.859078° W; thence southeasterly along Hancock Creek shoreline to the point of origin.
( c ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Except in cases of extreme emergency, all persons or vessels, other than those operated by the United States Navy or United States Coast Guard, are prohibited from entering the restricted area without prior permission of the enforcing agency.
( 2 ) Entry points into the danger zone will be prominently marked with signage indicating the boundary of the danger zone.
( 3 ) Firing will take place both day and night at irregular periods throughout the year. Appropriate warnings will be issued through official government and civilian channels serving the region. Such warnings will specify the time and duration of operations and give such other pertinent information as may be required in the interest of safety. Upon completion of firing or if the scheduled firing is cancelled for any reason, the warning signals marking the danger zone will be removed.
( 4 ) Except as otherwise provided in this section the danger zone will be open to general public access. Vessels, watercraft, and other vehicles may proceed through the danger zone.
( 5 ) The regulation in this section shall be enforced by the Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina, and/or persons or agencies as he/she may designate.
[73 FR 41265, July 18, 2008]
#### § 810.525 Notice provided to CBP regarding the Administrator's findings.

The Administrator will provide verification findings and analysis to CBP, which retains the authority to make the final determination of LVC compliance, based in part on the Administrator's verification findings.
# ADR – ADR.gov

Federal Government's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
#### § 245.35 Judgments to require removal.

When the owner or responsible party has been identified, and refuses or fails to take prompt action toward removal, the District Engineer may seek a judgment by the district court requiring removal.
§ 105.235 Communications. ( a ) The Facility Security Officer must have a means to effectively notify facility personnel of changes in security conditions at the facility.
( b ) Communication systems and procedures must allow effective and continuous communications between the facility security personnel, vessels interfacing with the facility, the cognizant COTP, and national and local authorities with security responsibilities.
( c ) At each active facility access point, provide a means of contacting police, security control, or an emergency operations center, by telephones, cellular phones, and/or portable radios, or other equivalent means.
( d ) Facility communications systems must have a backup means for both internal and external communications.
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 427I |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 62° anno19 dicembre 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 427I

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

62° anno19 dicembre 2019

---

| Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Avvisi |
| | PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI |
| | Commissione europea |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Invito a presentare candidature per il Premio Jan Amos Comenius per l’eccellenza nell’insegnamento dell’Unione europea | 1 |

Sommario

pagina

V   Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Commissione europea

2019/C 427 I/01

Invito a presentare candidature per il Premio Jan Amos Comenius per l’eccellenza nell’insegnamento dell’Unione europea

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

V Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Commissione europea

| 19.12.2019 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CI 427/1

---

Invito a presentare candidature

per il «Premio Jan Amos Comenius per l’eccellenza nell’insegnamento dell’Unione europea»

(2019/C 427 I/01)

La direzione generale dell’Istruzione, della gioventù, dello sport e della cultura della Commissione europea ha pubblicato un invito a presentare candidature per il «Premio Jan Amos Comenius per l’eccellenza nell’insegnamento dell’Unione europea».

Il premio sarà assegnato agli istituti secondari che aiutano i propri studenti a conoscere l’Unione europea utilizzando metodi coinvolgenti. Sottolineerà l’importanza dell’insegnamento dell’Unione europea e del suo apprendimento in giovane età, offrendo alle attività pertinenti in ciascuno Stato membro riconoscimento e visibilità a livello europeo. Il premio darà risalto a metodi di insegnamento innovativi che coinvolgono attivamente gli studenti nell’apprendimento dell’UE e contribuirà alla loro diffusione.

L’invito è aperto agli istituti secondari (livello CITE 2 e 3) istituiti e aventi sede nell’Unione europea (non ai singoli insegnanti).

Il concorso conferirà fino a ventotto (28) premi dell’importo di 8 000 EUR ciascuno, uno per Stato membro dell’UE.

Se il Regno Unito recederà dall’UE prima della decisione di aggiudicazione da parte della Commissione europea (che avviene poco dopo la valutazione delle domande) senza un accordo che garantisca il mantenimento dell’ammissibilità per i candidati del Regno Unito, gli istituti del Regno Unito cesseranno di essere ammissibili al premio. In questo caso, il numero massimo di premi sarà di 27 (anziché di 28), ma l’importo per premio rimarrà invariato (8 000 EUR).

Il termine per la presentazione delle candidature scade giovedì 6 febbraio 2020 alle ore 17.00 CET.

Tutte le informazioni pertinenti e i moduli per la candidatura sono disponibili all’indirizzo:

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_it.

---
§ 175.105 Definitions. ( a ) *Visual distress signal* means a device that is approved by the Commandant under 46 CFR Part 160 or certified by the manufacturer under 46 CFR Parts 160 and 161.
( b ) *Coastal waters* means: ( 1 ) The U.S. waters of the Great Lakes (Lake Erie, Huron, Michigan, Ontario, and Superior);
( 2 ) The territorial seas of the United States; and
( 3 ) Those waters directly connected to the Great Lakes and territorial seas (*i.e.*, bays, sounds, harbors, rivers, inlets, etc.) where any entrance exceeds 2 nautical miles between opposite shorelines to the first point where the largest distance between shorelines narrows to 2 miles, as shown on the current edition of the appropriate National Ocean Service chart used for navigation. Shorelines of islands or points of land present within a waterway are considered when determining the distance between opposite shorelines.
[CGD 76-183, 44 FR 73024, Dec. 17, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-073, 49 FR 7119, Feb. 27, 1984; 49 FR 20815, May 17, 1984]
§ 329.11 Geographic and jurisdictional limits of rivers and lakes. ( a ) *Jurisdiction over entire bed.* Federal regulatory jurisdiction, and powers of improvement for navigation, extend laterally to the entire water surface and bed of a navigable waterbody, which includes all the land and waters below the ordinary high water mark. Jurisdiction thus extends to the edge (as determined above) of all such waterbodies, even though portions of the waterbody may be extremely shallow, or obstructed by shoals, vegetation or other barriers. Marshlands and similar areas are thus considered navigable in law, but only so far as the area is subject to inundation by the ordinary high waters. ( 1 ) The “ordinary high water mark” on non-tidal rivers is the line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as a clear, natural line impressed on the bank; shelving; changes in the character of soil; destruction of terrestrial vegetation; the presence of litter and debris; or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas.
( 2 ) Ownership of a river or lake bed or of the lands between high and low water marks will vary according to state law; however, private ownership of the underlying lands has no bearing on the existence or extent of the dominant Federal jurisdiction over a navigable waterbody.
( b ) *Upper limit of navigability.* The character of a river will, at some point along its length, change from navigable to non-navigable. Very often that point will be at a major fall or rapids, or other place where there is a marked decrease in the navigable capacity of the river. The upper limit will therefore often be the same point traditionally recognized as the head of navigation, but may, under some of the tests described above, be at some point yet farther upstream.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40355

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLIFFORD ALEXANDER LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-95-CR-10-4

 No. G-98-CV-241

--------------------

December 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clifford Alexander Lewis appeals his drug conspiracy

conviction. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the

district court properly instructed the jury to consider the

evidence against each defendant separately and individually. 

Lewis contends that he was denied due process because the

district court failed to give such an instruction. Lewis

concedes that he did not object on this ground in the district

court and that this issue therefore is reviewed for plain error.
No. 01-40355

-2-

The record shows that the district court did give a proper

limiting instruction that effectively cured any risk of spillover

prejudice. See United States v. Morrow, 177 F.3d 272, 290 (5th

Cir. 1999). Specifically, the district court instructed the jury

that:

 A separate crime is charged against one

or more of the Defendants in each count of

the Superceding Indictment. Each Count, and

the evidence pertaining to it, should be

considered separately. Also, the case of

each Defendant should be considered

separately and individually. The fact that

you may find one or more of the Defendants

guilty or not guilty of any of the crimes

charged should not control your verdict as to

any other crime or any other Defendant. You

must give separate consideration to the

evidence as to each Defendant.

The jury is presumed to follow the court's instructions. Id. 

Lewis has shown no error, let alone plain error, in the district

court's jury instructions.

This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R.

42.2.
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.665 What are the requirements for a general alarm system? Each pumping platform complex must have a general alarm system that: ( a ) Is capable of being manually activated by using alarm boxes;
( b ) Is audible in all parts of the pumping platform complex, except in areas of high ambient noise levels where hearing protection is required under § 150.613 of this chapter; and
( c ) Has a high intensity flashing light in areas where hearing protection is used.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 8702 Unemployed Number in thousands 25 to 54 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU03000060Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Level - 25-54 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:08:39 PM)
Exhibit 99.1


                         Section 906 Certification
                         -------------------------

        The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Form 10-Q of the MLM Index Fund pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

        The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the MLM Index Fund.


August 14, 2002


/s/ Timothy J. Rudderow
-----------------------------
Timothy J. Rudderow
President
Mount Lucas Management Corporation,
the manager of the MLM Index Fund
#### § 793.9 “Chief engineer.”

A chief engineer is an employee who primarily supervises the operation maintenance and repair of all electronic equipment in the studio and at the transmitter and is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission as a Radio Telephone Operator First Class. In small stations, only one such engineer may be employed, and in some cases he may be assisted by part-time workers from other departments. The engineer in such cases will be regarded as employed as the “chief engineer” for purposes of the section 13(b) (9) exemption provided that he performs the duties described above and is properly licensed by the Federal Communications Commission. Where two or more engineers are employed by a station, only one may qualify as “chief engineer”—that one who, on the basis of the factual situation, is in charge of the engineering work.
[Crim. No. 1952.

First Appellate District, Division One.

July 8, 1937.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. LESTER DARBY et al., Defendants; HAROLD LOWRY, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Seibert L. Sefton, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

*660THE COURT.

—Defendant Lowry was charged with burglary and convicted. He appealed from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.  The matter came on regularly before this court, and by request of his counsel time to file a brief in support of the appeal was granted, but no brief was filed. We have examined the record, including the evidence, and are satisfied that the verdict is fully sustained and that no error was committed in the proceedings leading thereto.

The judgment and order are affirmed.
§ 26.09 List of exemptions. ( a ) All vessels navigating on those waters governed by the navigation rules for Great Lakes and their connecting and tributary waters (33 U.S.C. 241 *et seq.*) are exempt from the requirements of the Vessel Bridge-to-Bridge Radiotelephone Act and this part until May 6, 1975.
( b ) Each vessel navigating on the Great Lakes as defined in the Inland Navigational Rules Act of 1980 (33 U.S.C. 2001 *et seq.*) and to which the Vessel Bridge-to-Bridge Radiotelephone Act (33 U.S.C. 1201-1208) applies is exempt from the requirements in 33 U.S.C. 1203, 1204, and 1205 and the regulations under §§ 26.03, 26.04, 26.05, 26.06, and 26.07. Each of these vessels and each person to whom 33 U.S.C. 1208(a) applies must comply with Articles VII, X, XI, XII, XIII, XV, and XVI and Technical Regulations 1-9 of “The Agreement Between the United States of America and Canada for Promotion of Safety on the Great Lakes by Means of Radio, 1973.”
[CGD 72-223R, 37 FR 28633, Dec. 28, 1972, as amended by CGD 74-291, 39 FR 44980, Dec. 30, 1974; CGD 83-003, 48 FR 7442, Feb. 18, 1983; CGD 91-046, 57 FR 14486, Apr. 21, 1992]