alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-Tron International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Edward B.
Cloues, II, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




August 12, 2002                             /s/ Edward B. Cloues, II
                                            ------------------------
                                            Edward B. Cloues, II
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-23074-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

for himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER RESCHEDULING HEARING

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Reset Hearing, ECF No. [98] 

(“Motion”), filed on March 9, 2023. For good case shown, the Motion, ECF No. [98], is 

GRANTED. 

The motion hearing currently set for March 23, 2023, is RESET for March 29, 2023, at 

9:00 a.m., in Miami Division, 400 North Miami Avenue, Courtroom 10-2, Miami, Florida 33128. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on March 9, 2023.

__________________________________

BETH BLOOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 100 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/09/2023 Page 1 of 1
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  Agency-Level Determinations

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/Agency-Level Determinations Agency-Level DeterminationsADR2022-02-17T18:34:35-05:00
			
			Agency-Level Determinations**Who Adjudicates the Agency-Level Protest?**
Depending on the agency, the contracting officer or an individual above the contracting officer with independent decision authority, may adjudicate the protest. If the protest is decided by the contracting officer, the offeror may request that the agency provide for appellate review of the contracting officer’s decision by an independent decision authority.

**What Procedures are Involved in an Agency-Level Protest?**
No agency report is required to be compiled for an agency-level protest.  However, some agencies permit creation of an agency report pursuant to their own agency rules.  Whether the offeror is permitted to submit a response or reply to the agency report is dependent upon agency-specific rules.  Protesters are not entitled to seek source-selection documents relevant to the procurement.  Rather, the FAR states that the parties “may” exchange relevant information.  In addition, the successful awardee and other offerors are not entitled to intervene in the agency protest, although the agency could permit the awardee to submit comments if the agency finds a need or a benefit in doing so.  Pursuant to FAR 33.103(g), the contracting officer should make his or her best effort to render a decision within 35 days.  The decision is provided only to the protester; it is not published.  In the event that the contracting officer cannot render a decision within that time, the contracting officer is obligated to keep the protesting offeror apprised of when a decision will be forthcoming.  During the pendency of an agency-level protest, the procurement should be stayed if timely filed in accordance with FAR 33.103(f)(3).
**What is the Available Relief?**
The agency may take any action, including corrective action, or grant any remedy that could be recommended by the Comptroller General if the protest had been filed with GAO.  Agencies may also pay protest costs under the same standards that allow costs to be paid to a prevailing party in a GAO protest.  *See*FAR 33.102(b)(1). Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
Argued and submitted February 28,

reversed and remanded March 22, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*LARK CHARLES LOGAN, *Respondent.*

(93081444C; CA A84120)

891 P2d 1384

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Hari Nam S. Khalsa, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *State v. Conner,*132 Or App 478, 888 P2d 1087, *on recon*133 Or App 594, 891 P2d 1384 (1995).
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 3 NASS, USDA

All Layers: Average Number on Hand During the Month,

United States, 1996-99

Month 1996 1997 1998 1999

1,000 Layers 1,000 Layers 1,000 Layers 1,000 Layers

Dec 1

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

299,345

299,230

298,904

298,853

297,493

295,516

294,837

296,290

297,804

298,582

300,052

302,386

304,463

304,289

304,000

304,285

303,618

302,241

300,537

299,605
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 4 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board




Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 10 NASS, USDA

Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 12 NASS, USDA

Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 14 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 15 NASS, USDA

Egg-Type Chicks Hatched: By State and United States,

January 1998-99

Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 3
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 2 of 3
Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-80144-CR-Smith/Maynard(s)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

REGINE MARIE RENE,

Defendant.

VERDICT

We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:

COUNT 1

As to Count 1, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, we find the Defendant, REGINE MARIE 

RENE:

G GUILTY G NOT GUILTY

COUNT 2

As to Count 2, conspiracy to launder money, we find the Defendant, REGINE MARIE 

RENE:

G GUILTY G NOT GUILTY

SO SAY WE ALL:

___________________________________ ______________________

Foreperson (please sign) Date

West Palm Beach, Florida

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 90-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/12/2022 Page 1 of 1
Draft Proposal CB-33 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Fan Horsepower Exceptions Simplified (CB-33) 

Objective:   Simplify provisions for motor nameplate horsepower by replacing complicated exceptions

with positive statements of what is required.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C403.2.10.2 as follows:

C403.2.10.2 Motor nameplate horsepower. For each fan, the fan brake horse power shall be indicated 

on the design documents and the selected motor shall be no larger than the first available motor size 

greater than the following: brake horsepower. The fan brake horse power shall be indicated on the 

design documents to allow for compliance verification by the code official.

Exceptions:

1. For fans less than 6 bhp (4413 W), 1.5 x the fan brake horsepower. where the first available motor 

larger than the brake horsepower has a nameplate rating within 50 percent of the bhp, selection of the 

next larger nameplate motor size is allowed. 

2. For fans 6 bhp (4413 W) and larger, 1.3 x the fan brake horsepower. where the first available 

motor larger than the bhp has a nameplate rating within 30 percent of the bhp, selection of the next 

larger nameplate motor size is allowed.

Reason:  The complex exceptions are replaced with a positive statement of what is required.  This will

reduce confusion over the maximum horsepower requirement.

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
a50331211ex10-29.htm


Exhibit 10.29


 


Written Description of Annual Incentive Plan


 


The annual incentive plan is structured to provide potential bonus payments to the participants based upon an economic value added (EVA) performance measurement, which is derived from return on capital employed.  The plan provides for bonuses based upon the EVA of the entire Company in the case of certain executives, and upon the EVA of one of the Company’s two divisions for other executives.


 


EVA is calculated under the incentive plan by determining the capital employed in the portion of the Company that employs the award recipient (the Company or one of the Company’s two divisions, referred to herein as a “reporting unit’), and then multiplying the capital employed by a cost of capital (stated as a percentage) to determine the “capital charge” for each reporting unit.  The sum of operating income earned by a reporting unit for each month during the fiscal year in excess of the capital charge for the reporting unit for that month is deemed to be the economic value added, or EVA, produced by the reporting unit for the year.  To the extent that EVA is produced by a reporting unit in a fiscal year, a sharing percentage is used to determine the bonus pool for the award recipients from that reporting unit.  The bonus pool is divided among the recipients from the reporting unit in accordance with proportions established by the Compensation Committee, stated as a target bonus opportunity.  The Committee also establishes a target amount of EVA for each reporting unit.  The sharing percentage for award recipients increases if the reporting unit achieves EVA above the target level.  Bonus amounts are paid in cash.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"),
I, K. S. Adams, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ K. S. Adams, Jr.
------------------------------
K. S. Adams, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2003

                                      -34-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXCERPTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          30,574
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,317
<INVENTORY>                                     43,376
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,688
<PP&E>                                         114,411
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,599
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,023
<COMMON>                                         3,184
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   357,411
<SALES>                                        201,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               333,307
<CGS>                                          117,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,864
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,523
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,630)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,630)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
HEALTHYLIVINGTIPS

 Get Set for a Healthy Summer

In most parts of the United States, the beautiful colors and temperate 

weather of summer are a welcome break from the cold grey of 

winter. But warm weather can lead to serious health risks.

Start planning now to avoid some of the health risks summer can bring by 

following these tips:

•	Keep cool. Make sure your home’s air conditioner or climate control system

is working properly. If you do not have climate control, think about public

places where you can go to comfortably spend time on hot days. Some examples

include local senior centers, libraries, shopping malls and movie theaters.

•	Stay indoors. Plan your summer activities so that you are indoors during the

hottest part of the day. Run your errands early in the morning or at dusk when

the temperatures drop slightly.

•	Cover up. When you do need to go outside, protect yourself from the sun by

wearing plenty of sunscreen, and invest now in a comfortable, wide-brimmed hat.

•	Stay hydrated. Make sure you have a supply of water and plenty of ice in your

home. And if you are going out, take a bottle of water with you.

•	Breath easy. Spend less time outdoors on humid days, especially if you are

allergic to pollen or live in an area where there is a lot of air pollution.

•	Stay informed. Throughout the summer, follow your local weather reports to

find out when your community is experiencing severe heat and humidity.

Useful Resources

Administration on Aging Health Related Resources

http://www.aoa.gov/AoARoot/Preparedness/Resources_Individuals/Health_

Resources.aspx

National Institutes of Health Medline Plus – Heat Illness

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/heatillness.html

FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT AOA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

ADMINISTRATION ON AGING, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20201

PHONE: (202) 619-0724 | FAX: (202) 357-3555 | EMAIL: AOAINFO@AOA.GOV | WEB: WWW.AOA.GOV |

FACEBOOK: WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/AOA.GOV
§ 325.5 Forms of permits. ( a ) *General discussion.* ( 1 ) DA permits under this regulation will be in the form of individual permits or general permits. The basic format shall be ENG Form 1721, DA Permit (Appendix A).
( 2 ) The general conditions included in ENG Form 1721 are normally applicable to all permits; however, some conditions may not apply to certain permits and may be deleted by the issuing officer. Special conditions applicable to the specific activity will be included in the permit as necessary to protect the public interest in accordance with § 325.4 of this part.
( b ) *Individual permits* — ( 1 ) *Standard permits.* A standard permit is one which has been processed through the public interest review procedures, including public notice and receipt of comments, described throughout this part. The standard individual permit shall be issued using ENG Form 1721.
( 2 ) *Letters of permission.* A letter of permission will be issued where procedures of § 325.2(e)(1) have been followed. It will be in letter form and will identify the permittee, the authorized work and location of the work, the statutory authority, any limitations on the work, a construction time limit and a requirement for a report of completed work. A copy of the relevant general conditions from ENG Form 1721 will be attached and will be incorporated by reference into the letter of permission.
( c ) *General permits* — ( 1 ) *Regional permits.* Regional permits are a type of general permit. They may be issued by a division or district engineer after compliance with the other procedures of this regulation. If the public interest so requires, the issuing authority may condition the regional permit to require a case-by-case reporting and acknowledgment system. However, no separate applications or other authorization documents will be required.
( 2 ) *Nationwide permits.* Nationwide permits are a type of general permit and represent DA authorizations that have been issued by the regulation (33 CFR part 330) for certain specified activities nationwide. If certain conditions are met, the specified activities can take place without the need for an individual or regional permit.
( 3 ) *Programmatic permits.* Programmatic permits are a type of general permit founded on an existing state, local or other Federal agency program and designed to avoid duplication with that program.
( d ) *Section 9 permits.* Permits for structures in interstate navigable waters of the United States under section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 will be drafted at DA level.
#### Hunter *et al. v.*The State.

Submitted November 19,

Decided December 11, 1906.

Accusation of riot. Before Judge Hammond. City court of Griffin. October *12,*1906.

*Robert T. Daniel*and *E. G.*Armistead, for plaintiffs in error.

*Thomas E. Patterson, solicitor-general,*contra.

Eish, O. J.

To constitute the offense of riot there must be a common intent to commit the act constituting the alleged riotous conduct. Accordingly, it was error requiring the grant of a new trial for the court, upon the trial of two persons charged with this offense, to instruct the jury that if the defendants “united, with or without a common intent, in doing an unlawful act of violence, the acts and words of each one while the thing [was] in progress [became] the acts and words of the other one engaged therein.” *Dixon*v. *State,*105 *Ga.*787, and cit.; *Tripp*v. *State,*109 *Ga.*489; *Coney*v. *State,*113 *Ga.*1060.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[House Report 111-113]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    111-113

======================================================================

 
   WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(A) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 
  CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON 
                                 RULES

                                _______
                                

    May 18, 2009.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

  Mr. Perlmutter, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 450]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 450, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any resolution reported on the legislative day of May 19, 
2009 providing for consideration or disposition of S. 896, a 
bill to prevent mortgage foreclosures and enhance mortgage 
credit availability.

                                  

```
Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services 

Chronic Disease Self-Management Education Program Grantee

1 of 2

Goals, Strategies, 

and Activities

The overall purposes of this 3-year CapacityBuilding grant are to:

• Develop capacity in areas with no or 

limited evidence-based program 

infrastructure to introduce, deliver, and 

expand the reach of evidence-based 

chronic disease-self-management 

education and self-management support 

programs within underserved geographic 

areas and/or populations; and

• Develop sustainability strategies to 

support the proposed programs during 

and beyond the grant period.

The Nebraska Department of Health and Human 

Services (Nebraska DHHS) and its partners will: 

• Engage older adults and adults with 

disabilities in the Chronic Disease SelfManagement Program (CDSMP) and 

Diabetes Self-Management Program

(DSMP) across the state of Nebraska.

• Develop partnerships across local service 

delivery organizations to increase access 

to evidence-based programs.

• Leverage partnerships with health care 

organizations across the state that 

currently provide health care screenings 

through other Nebraska DHHS programs.

Proposed Interventions

• Chronic Disease Self-Management 

Program

• Diabetes Self-Management Program

Partnerships

To achieve the goals of the grant, the Nebraska 

DHHS will collaborate with the following key 

partners:

• Area Agencies on Aging

• Community Action Partnerships

• Diabetes Self-Management Education 

Task Force

• Federally Qualified Health Centers

• Local Health Departments

• Great Plains Quality Innovation Network
2 of 2

This project is supported by the Prevention and Public Health Fund 2018.

Anticipated Results

The Nebraska DHHS and its partners propose to 

achieve the following results: 

• Engage 450 participants in CDSMP and 

DSMP over the 3-year grant period.

• Maintain a 72% participant completion 

rate in both programs.

• Expand access to evidence-based 

programs among older adults that are 

low income, uninsured, or underinsured, 

as well as individuals living in rural 

communities. 

Contact:

Jamie Hahn

Nebraska Department of Health and Human 

Services

jamie.k.hahn@nebraska.gov

For more information: 

Administration for Community Living 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Washington, DC 20201

http://www.acl.gov