alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 1 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 2 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 3 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 4 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 5 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 6 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 7 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 8 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 9 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 10 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 11 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 12 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 13 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 14 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 15 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 16 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 17 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 18 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 19 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 20 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 21 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 22 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 23 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 24 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 25 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 26 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 27 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 28 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 29 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 30 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 31 of 32

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB   Document 122-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2023   Page 32 of 32
MEETING AGENDA AND ATTENDANCE

Meeting Date/Time: February 14th, 2018 1:30pm – 3:00pm

Location: USDA, 1400 Independence Ave, SW, 1st Floor, Room 1052(c)

Agenda and Highlights:

1) COFO Executive Committee Election Results 

2) Records Management and the new General Records Schedule (GRS)

3) Outreach Activities-Share your experience, what have you found to be effective, how 

have you communicated the function and value of your office?

4) Post Chair Advisory Committee-update 

5) Request for ideas for the focus of the Government Sector Meeting at the upcoming IOA 

Conference

6) Additional topics raised by Members (please include suggested topics or Ombuds 

Challenges with your RSVP)

Attendees:

In-Person

Berg, Mollie – Department of Homeland Security

Dea, Joanne – United States Department of Agriculture

Doyle, Bill – Department of Homeland Security

Gordon, Laurel – Department of Justice

Heffernan, Claire – Department of Homeland Security

Holman, Patrick – Department of Energy

Kinnavy, Noreen – International Broadcasting Bureau VOA and Cuba Broadcasting Office

Levine, Lisa – Department of Justice

Little, Tim – Department of State

Luckam, Stephanie - Department of Homeland Security

Maurer, Bill – Department of Energy

Palosky, Dania – Smithsonian

Pritzker, David – Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Raines, Eric – Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Sotoudeh, Paul – U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Phone

Adams, Joanne - United States Department of Agriculture

Bookstein, Monique – Department of Justice

Clayborn, Samuel – General Services Administration

Daramola, Tangita – Department of Health and Human Services

Drefchinski, Megan – Federal Reserve Board

Fleming, Tasha – Department of Justice

Gartlan, Jennifer – Federal Maritime Commission

Hill, Gary – Department of Defense

Hurley, Nathan - Department of Health and Human Services

Kelly, John – Small Business Administration

Lard, Jennifer – Department of Health and Human Services

Larkins, Marcia - Department of Health and Human Services

Lease-Stachler, Mona - Student

McGuire, Carrie – Office of Government Information Services

McNeil, Tracey – U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Merrix, Celeste – Department of Homeland Security

Morey, Chauncenette – Department of Justice

Perez, Neida – Mediator

Plonk, Maureen – Department of Homeland Security

Semo, Alina – National Archives and Records Administration

Smith, Tyler – National Institute of Health

Weber, Guy – Department of Defense

Whittington, Fred (Whitt) – Department of Labor

Wolfe, Lexi – Small Business Administration

Zrubek, Tom – Department of Defense
Exhibit 32.1

                            RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                         RELM Wireless Corporation


                                         /s/David P. Storey
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         David P. Storey
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         October 28, 2004
Case 1:22-cr-20428-CMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2022 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:22-cr-20428-CMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2022 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:22-cr-20428-CMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2022 Page 3 of 4
10/26/2022

10/26/2022

Case 1:22-cr-20428-CMM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2022 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF ASIAINFO HOLDINGS, INC.



|                                                       |  |                                             
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                                             |  | State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
|AsiaInfo H.K. Limited                                  |  | Hong Kong                                   
|                                                       | 
|AsiaInfo (H.K.) Systems Co. Limited                    |  | Hong Kong                                   
|                                                       | 
|AsiaInfo Technologies (Chengdu), Inc.                  |  | China                                       
|                                                       | 
|AsiaInfo Technologies (China), Inc.                    |  | China                                       
|                                                       | 
|Bonson Information Technology Limited                  |  | British Virgin Islands                      
|                                                       | 
|AsiaInfo Management Software, Inc.                     |  | China                                       
|                                                       | 
|Times AsiaInfo Technologies (Beijing), Inc.            |  | China                                       
|                                                       | 
|Beijing Star VATS Technologies, Inc.                   |  | China                                       
|                                                       | 
|Lenovo-AsiaInfo Technologies, Inc.                     |  | China                                       
|                                                       | 
|Lenovo Computer System and Technology Services Limited |  | China                                       
|                                                       | 
|Lenovo Security Technologies (Beijing), Inc.           |  | China                                       
|                                                       | 
|AsiaInfo Lenovo USA, Inc.                              |  | Delaware                                    
|                                                       | 
|Han International Consulting Company Ltd.              |  | British Virgin Islands                      
|                                                       | 
|Goldfame Consultants Ltd.                              |  | British Virgin Islands                      
|                                                       | 
|Han Management Consulting (China) Limited              |  | China
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abrams Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan R. Abrams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: December 12, 2003                                /s/ Alan R. Abrams
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       Alan R. Abrams
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
United States EPA 744-F-00-004 

Environmental Protection Agency June 2000 

Design for the Environment, Auto Refinishing Shop Project 

HVLP SPRAY GUNS: Cost-effective, environment-friendly technology


SAVE $$$$$ ON PAINT PROTECT YOUR HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT 

REDUCE PAINT OVERSPRAY AND EMISSIONS 

Why should you use High-Volume Low-Pressure (HVLP) spray guns? 

Paint spray contains harmful chemicals 

such as isocyanates, solvents, and paint 

additives. Painting with an HVLP spray 

gun significantly reduces overspray and 

as a result: 

(1)	 Releases of toxic chemicals into the 

air go down, helping protect you, your 

co-workers, and your shop’s 

neighborhood. 

SAVE UP TO $13,000 ON PAINT COSTS EVERY YEAR! 

$6,900 

$13,000 

$0 

$5,000 

$10,000 

$15,000 

Sw itching fromConventional to HVLPSpray Guns Sw itching fromConventional to HVLPSpray Guns, and 

Using the HVLPGuns with Proper Techniques 

Estimated Annual Savings on Paint 

Purchases 

(2)	 The amount of paint you need to 

refinish a car goes down, saving your 

shop many dollars in paint costs (see 

graph). 

Can you achieve a high quality 

finish using HVLP spray guns? 

This graph highlights the dollar savings auto refinishing shops can realize in switching 

from conventional to HVLP spray guns. If painters use proper spray technique and gun 

settings, savings nearly double. Estimates are based on data from the STAR program* 

at the Iowa Waste Reduction Center, for a shop that refinishes 15 cars per week. 

Yes! Painters at many auto shops use only HVLP spray guns when refinishing cars, without sacrificing the quality of the 

finish, even for top coats. Of course, you’ll need to make some technical adjustments to your pressure settings and spray 

cap when converting from a conventional spray gun to an HVLP spray gun. But once you do, you’ll find that HVLP spray 

guns are relatively easy to use, reduce overspray, and produce a high quality finish. 

How can I get more information on HVLP spray guns, proper spray techniques, hazard 

controls, and other resources? 

Contact the Spray Technique and Analysis Research (STAR) program at the Iowa Waste Reduction Center (1-800-422-

3109; www.iwrc.org) for technical assistance. 

Talk to your jobber, paint distributor, or equipment supplier. 

Consult with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) by either 

visiting their website (www.cdc.gov/niosh/paintovr.html) or calling 1-800-35-NIOSH. 

Talk to Mary Cushmac (202-260-4443; cushmac.mary@epa.gov) or David DiFiore (202-

2603374; difiore.david@epa.gov) of the DfE Project Team. 

THE DESIGN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AUTO REFINISHING SHOP PROJECT’S GOAL IS TO WORK WITH AUTO 

REFINISHERS TO IDENTIFY AND ADOPT SAFER, CLEANER, MORE EFFICIENT PRACTICES AND TECHNOLOGIES. 

www.epa.gov/dfe/autobody/autobody.html
§ 330.3 Activities occurring before certain dates. The following activities were permitted by NWPs issued on July 19, 1977, and, unless the activities are modified, they do not require further permitting: ( a ) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States outside the limits of navigable waters of the United States that occurred before the phase-in dates which extended Section 404 jurisdiction to all waters of the United States. The phase-in dates were: After July 25, 1975, discharges into navigable waters of the United States and adjacent wetlands; after September 1, 1976, discharges into navigable waters of the United States and their primary tributaries, including adjacent wetlands, and into natural lakes, greater than 5 acres in surface area; and after July 1, 1977, discharges into all waters of the United States, including wetlands. (section 404)
( b ) Structures or work completed before December 18, 1968, or in waterbodies over which the DE had not asserted jurisdiction at the time the activity occurred, provided in both instances, there is no interference with navigation. Activities completed shoreward of applicable Federal Harbor lines before May 27, 1970 do not require specific authorization. (section 10)
Exhibit 4.44


 


Summary of the Private Instrument
of Commitment to Purchase and Sale of Real Property, entered into on June 28, 2019, in connection with Fazenda Jatobá


 


Parties:
Imobiliária Jaborandi Ltda., as Seller; John Kudiess and Harald Kudiess, as Buyers; and Jaborandi Agrícola Ltda.,
as intervening-consenting party.


 


Purpose: The
commitment to sell a total area of 3,258 hectares, of which 2,473 hectares are arable, to be originated from Fazenda Jatobá,
for the total price, in Brazilian national currency (Reais), equivalent to 742,710 bags of soybeans, to be paid as follows:
(i) the first installment in the amount of R$ 10,008,231.00 shall be paid on June 28, 2019 (R$ 5,000,000.00) and July 31, 2019
(R$ 5,008,231.00); (ii) the second installment, in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 101,555 bags of soybeans,
shall be paid on July 31,2020; (iii) the third installment, in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 100,039 bags
of soybeans, shall be paid on July 31, 2021; (iv) the fourth installment, in the amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent
to 100,039 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on July 31, 2022; (v) the fifth installment, in the amount, in Brazilian Reais,
equivalent to 100,039 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on July 31, 2023; (vi) the sixth installment, in the amount, in Brazilian
Reais, equivalent to 100,039 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on July 31, 2024; and (vii) the seventh installment, in the
amount, in Brazilian Reais, equivalent to 100,039 bags of soybeans, shall be paid on July 31, 2025.
SOLUTIONS

TerrAqua Resource Management (TARM) is a joint venture of Larson 

Design Group (LDG), Williamsport, PA and Newalta, Calgary, Alberta, 

Canada that offers water resource management services that support 

exploration and development in the Marcellus Shale play. Because of this 

relationship, TARM’s operations are engineering-driven, focusing on high 

environmental compliance, occupational safety, and cost control.

TARM’s primary service is a zero-liquid discharge process. TARM 

processes a client’s generated water (flowback and produced) that allows 

for reuse in well development operations. TARM facilities are located in or 

near established drilling patterns. Trucks travel loaded both ways, so 

mileage is reduced and efficiency increased. TARM’s treatment process 

results in water that meets client’s standard for reuse in drilling operations. 

After treatment, water is reused by the client, reducing the client’s 

dependency on fresh water. This process, including related services, is 

deployed by two facility types.

◾ Conventional Centralized facilities are convenient to drilling patterns 

and supported by good roadway networks. These facilities are 

permitted for 400K gpd and allocate treatment capacity to several 

operators.

◾ Fixed-Field facilities are located in the client’s drilling pattern. The 

site is selected to reduce transportation expense. These facilities 

are not wheel-based. They utilize industry-standard construction 

methods and can be easily mobilized, demobilized, and relocated. 

This allows for site reclamation.

TARM’s initial facility at Water Tower Square in Williamsport is the first 

facility to receive a Residual Waste-Beneficial Reuse Permit 

(MWGR121/123) from PADEP’s Bureau of Waste Management. That 

permit was issued in March 2010. Operations started in April 2010. As of 

January23, 2012, TARM has treated and returned to its clients 100+ 

million gallons of generated water. In addition, this facility is the first to 

receive WQM-Part 1 approval for treatment and discharge under PADEP’s 

new TDS strategy.

Solutions | TARM Page 1 of 2

http://www.tarmsolutions.com/solutions/ 10/28/2013
Solutions | TARM Page 2 of 2

http://www.tarmsolutions.com/solutions/ 10/28/2013
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6596
PIERRE A. RENOIR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 99-6698
PIERRE A. RENOIR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden, Defendants - Appellees.
No. 99-6722
PIERRE A. RENOIR, Plaintiff - Appellant,2 versus RON ANGELONE; GEORGE E. DEEDS, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-211-7) Submitted: July 13, 1999 Decided: August 30, 1999 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pierre A. Renoir, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Pierre A. Renoir seeks to appeal district court orders denying his motion to join other plaintiffs in his action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), denying his motion for appointment of counsel, and staying the case pending the conclusion of the appeals of the first two orders. We dismiss all three appeals for lack ofjurisdiction because the orders are interlocutory and not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The orders appealed here are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. We therefore dismiss the appeals as interlocutory. We further deny Renoir’s “Petition for Subpoena Duces Tecum” and motion to consolidate Appeal No. 99-6863 with these appeals, and deny as moot his motion to consolidate Appeals Nos. 99-6698 and 99-6722 with 99- 6596. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
123 STAT. 1610 PUBLIC LAW 111–17—MAY 7, 2009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S.J. Res. 8: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Mar. 17, considered and passed Senate. 

Apr. 22, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–17 

111th Congress 

Joint Resolution 

Providing for the appointment of David M. Rubenstein as a citizen regent of the 

Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes (20 U.S.C. 43), 

the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 

in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring because 

of the expiration of the term of Anne d’Harnoncourt of Pennsylvania 

is filled by the appointment of David M. Rubenstein of Maryland. 

The appointment is for a term of 6 years, effective on the date 

of enactment of this joint resolution. 

Approved May 7, 2009. 

Effective date. 

May 7, 2009 

[S.J. Res. 8] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 64.16 Duration of marking on sunken vessels in navigable waters. Markings shall be maintained until: ( a ) The sunken vessel or other obstruction is removed; or
( b ) The right of the owner to abandon is legally established and exercised.
Note:
Notices of abandonment of sunken vessels or other obstructions will not be accepted by the Coast Guard. Any notice of intention to abandon should be addressed to the District Engineer, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, within whose district the sunken vessel or other obstruction is located.