alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,380,172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,996,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,000
<INVENTORY>                                    130,350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,713,541
<PP&E>                                       1,976,090
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,786,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,591,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,360,945
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,500,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       488,183
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,591,170
<SALES>                                      1,755,269
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,755,269
<CGS>                                        1,416,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,185,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (414,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (21,291)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (393,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (393,120)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP96-367-011]

Take notice that on May 31, 2000, Northwest Pipeline Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff the following tariff sheets to be effective July 1, 2000:

### Third Revised Volume No. 1

Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 5

Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 5-A

### Original Volume No. 2

Twenty-Fifth Revised Sheet No. 2

Twenty-Eighth Revised Sheet No. 2.1

Twenty-Seventh Revised Sheet No. 2-A

Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to move into effect the Period Two Rates contained in Appendix A of Northwest's Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement filed on July 22, 1997 in Docket No. RP96-367 and approved by the Commission on November 25, 1997.

Northwest states that a copy of this filing has been served upon its customers and interested state regulatory commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14556  Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.988 Taylor Bayou Outfall Canal (Joint Outfall Canal (JOC)). The draw of the Valero Bridge, mile 2.44, at the Valero facility in West Port Arthur, shall operate as follows: ( a ) The draw shall be unmanned and maintained in the fully open-to-navigation position, except 6:30 a.m. through 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. through 6:30 p.m. daily.
( b ) One hour prior to closing, a broadcast will be made warning of the impending closure on VHF-FM channels 16 and 13.
( c ) 10 minutes prior to closing, the broadcast will be repeated warning of the impending closure on VHF-FM channels 16 and 13.
( d ) The crewmember/tender will monitor the portable marine radio on approach to the bridge. When work crew approaches the bridge, it will stop and the crewmember/tender will observe the waterway for approaching vessels. If vessels are observed approaching the bridge, they will be allowed to pass prior to closing the bridge.
( e ) An audible alarm will be heard during the opening and closing sequences of the bridge.
( f ) Emergency marine traffic will be allowed to pass upon request. The bridge will require up to 30 minutes to cycle to allow for the passage of vessels. This request can be made on VHF-FM channel 16.
( g ) If the bridge is required to operate outside of the specified times, the bridge will be tended until it is returned to the open-to-navigation position.
[USCG-2014-0386, 79 FR 56654, Sept. 23, 2014, as amended by USCG-2014-0386, 80 FR 22103, Apr. 21, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 565 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 565

             Designating May 15, 2008 as Military Kids Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2008

   Mr. Roberts (for himself, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Allard, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. 
 Brown, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Craig, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Dole, Mr. 
Domenici, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Levin, 
 Mrs. McCaskill, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Smith, Ms. Stabenow, 
  Mr. Stevens, and Mr. Sessions) submitted the following resolution; 
                   which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
             Designating May 15, 2008 as Military Kids Day.

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces of the United States are the greatest 
        soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines in the world;
Whereas as individuals and as a group, the members Armed Forces of the United 
        States daily place their lives on the line for the United States, both 
        here or abroad;
Whereas the children of these patriots, even the youngest of them, recognize the 
        incredible service their parents provide, and daily face the challenges 
        of military life, with frequent moves, separation from their loved ones, 
        and uncertainty about the future;
Whereas the voices of these children are seldom heard and their own particular 
        sacrifices seldom acknowledged;
Whereas the children of the members of the Armed Forces of the United States 
        have an important creative outlet through the Annual Essay and Art 
        Contest of the Armed Services YMCA;
Whereas the compelling essays and artwork by military children will be published 
        in My Hero: Military Kids Write about their Moms and Dads; and
Whereas the strength of character, humor and honesty offered by these children 
        are a hallmark for all of us to follow as we face the challenges of 
        everyday life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the significance of the sacrifices made 
        every day by the thousands of families across the country and 
        the world in support of the members of the Armed Forces of the 
        United States;
            (2) expresses gratitude for their fortitude, their 
        strength, their compassion, and their expertise;
            (3) supports the efforts of the Armed Services YMCA and the 
        many other organizations that work to assist the military 
        families of the United States; and
            (4) designates May 15, 2008, as ``Military Kids Day'' in 
        the United States and at military installations throughout the 
        world.
                                 <all>
```
§ 327.8 Conduct of hearings. ( a ) The presiding officer shall make an opening statement outlining the purpose of the hearing and prescribing the general procedures to be followed.
( b ) Hearings shall be conducted by the presiding officer in an orderly but expeditious manner. Any person shall be permitted to submit oral or written statements concerning the subject matter of the hearing, to call witnesses who may present oral or written statements, and to present recommendations as to an appropriate decision. Any person may present written statements for the hearing record prior to the time the hearing record is closed to public submissions, and may present proposed findings and recommendations. The presiding officer shall afford participants a reasonable opportunity for rebuttal.
( c ) The presiding officer shall have discretion to establish reasonable limits upon the time allowed for statements of witnesses, for arguments of parties or their counsel or representatives, and upon the number of rebuttals.
( d ) Cross-examination of witnesses shall not be permitted.
( e ) All public hearings shall be reported verbatim. Copies of the transcripts of proceedings may be purchased by any person from the Corps of Engineers or the reporter of such hearing. A copy will be available for public inspection at the office of the appropriate district engineer.
( f ) All written statements, charts, tabulations, and similar data offered in evidence at the hearing shall, subject to exclusion by the presiding officer for reasons of redundancy, be received in evidence and shall constitute a part of the record.
( g ) The presiding officer shall allow a period of not less than 10 days after the close of the public hearing for submission of written comments.
( h ) In appropriate cases, the district engineer may participate in joint public hearings with other Federal or state agencies, provided the procedures of those hearings meet the requirements of this regulation. In those cases in which the other Federal or state agency allows a cross-examination in its public hearing, the district engineer may still participate in the joint public hearing but shall not require cross examination as a part of his participation.
#### § 401.92 Wintering and laying-up.

No vessel shall winter within the Seaway or lay-up within the Seaway during the navigation season except with the written permission of the Manager or the Corporation and subject to the conditions and charges that may be imposed.

[77 FR 40805, July 11, 2012]
[Civ. No. 11419.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

June 28, 1937.]

#### MARIAN BARA PFEFFERKORN, Appellant, v. ABE KANNER, Respondent.

*590Jacob Forst for Appellant.

Parker & Stanbury, Harry D. Parker, Raymond G. Stan-bury and Vernon W. Hunt for Respondent.

McCOMB, J.

—This appeal is from a judgment in favor of respondent after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to respondent, the essential facts are these:

> Respondent, a bottler of water charged with carbon dioxide, sold six bottles thereof to Frank Boros, a retailer, who thereafter sold one of the bottles to the brother or sister of plaintiff. While plaintiff’s brother was carrying the bottle by the syphon head the bottom blew out and a piece of glass struck plaintiff in the forehead, causing injuries.

The sole question presented for determination is this:

> *Was there substantial evidence to sustain the trial court’s finding that defendant was not negligent?*

This question must be answered in the affirmative. We have examined the record and are of the opinion there was substantial evidence considered in connection with such inferences as the trial court may have reasonably drawn therefrom to sustain the finding of fact set forth, *supra,*and each and every other material finding of fact upon which the judgment was necessarily predicated. We therefore refrain from further discussion of the evidence. *(Thatch*v. *Livingston,*13 Cal. App. (2d) 202 [56 Pac. (2d) *549]; Koeberle*v. *Hotchkiss,*8 Cal. App. (2d) 634 [48 Pac. (2d) 104] ; *Leavens*v. *Pinkham & McKevitt,*164 Cal. 242, 245 [128 Pac. 399].)

For an excellent discussion of the duty of this court relative to the review of findings of fact of the trial court see the opinion of Mr. Presiding Justice Grail in *Washko*v. *Stewart,*20 Cal. App. (2d) 347 [67 Pac. (2d) 144].

The judgment is affirmed.

Grail, P. J., concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36687-36688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-307-000]


U-T Offshore System, L.L.C.; Notice of Compliance Filing

June 5, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 31, 2000, U-T Offshore System, L.L.C. (U-
TOS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective September 28, 
1999:

First Revised Sheet No. 56
First Revised Sheet No. 57
First Revised Sheet No. 60
First Revised Sheet No. 61
Original Sheet No. 61A
First Revised Sheet No. 95
First Revised Sheet No. 96
First Revised Sheet No. 97

    U-TOS states that the instant filing incorporates and properly 
paginates in UTOS' current tariff changes that were pending at the time 
UTOS' conversion tariff filing was being approved.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm 

[[Page 36688]]

(call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14568 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 62.33 Information and regulatory marks. ( a ) Information and Regulatory Marks are used to alert the mariner to various warnings or regulatory matters. These marks have orange geometric shapes against a white background. The meanings associated with the orange shapes are as follows: ( 1 ) A vertical open-faced diamond signifies danger.
( 2 ) A vertical diamond shape having a cross centered within indicates that vessels are excluded from the marked area.
( 3 ) A circular shape indicates that certain operating restrictions are in effect within the marked area.
( 4 ) A square or rectangular shape will contain directions or instructions lettered within the shape.
( b ) When a buoy is used as an information or regulatory mark it shall be white with two horizontal orange bands placed completely around the buoy circumference. One band shall be near the top of the buoy body, with a second band placed just above the waterline of the buoy so that both bands are clearly visible.
[CGD 86-031, 52 FR 42640, Nov. 6, 1987, as amended by CGD 97-018, 63 FR 33573, June 19, 1998]
#### FRANCIS VOSE, Respondent, *v.*DAVID L. YULEE, Appellant.

*Removal of cause to United States cow't—order of court or aceeptam.ee of sureties essential*— *Collateral security*— *improper disposition*of— *burden of proof.*

The mere filing of the papera on an application for the removal of a cause to the United States court, does not have the effect of removing the action. The court must act upon them either by order or by accepting the sureties offered. *(Bell*v. *Dix,*49 N. Y., 233; *Cooke*v. *State Nat. Bank,*52 id., 96; *Suydam*v. *Smith,*1 Denio, 263; *Fairchild*v. *Durand,*8 Abb. Pr., 305; *Bristol v. Chapman,*
      *62934 How., 140; *Gordon*v. *Longest,*16 Peters, 97; *Kanouse*v. *Martin,*15 How. [U. S.], 198; *Ins. Co.*v. *Dunn,*19 Wall., 222.)

Where an indorser of a note is sued upon it, if the plaintiff has received any collateral security for its payment, the burden of proof is on the party sued to show that such collateral security has been improperly disposed of.

This action was originally commenced against the defendant Yulee, jointly with the Florida Railroad Company, Edward R. Dickerson, Marshall O. Roberts and Isaac H. Roberts, who were joined as co-defendants, and was founded upon an indebtedness of the Florida Railroad Company to the plaintiff upon certain notes made by the company, upon a part of which David L. Yulee was indorser. It was originally tried in 1869 at Special Term, without a jury. That court dismissed the complaint as to all the defendants. The General Term affirmed the action of the Special Term, but on the plaintiff’s appeal to the Court of Appeals, that court, affirming the judgment as to all the defendants but Yulee, reversed it and ordered a new trial as to him alone. (50 N. Y., 369.)

After the decision of the Court of Appeals the defendant Yulee filed a petition for the removal of the case into the United States Circuit Court, under the act of July 27th, 1866. (14 Stat., 306.) The motion was denied. When the case was called for trial at Special Term, he again moved that that court proceed no further, basing his motion on the same ground. This was also denied.

The plaintiff rested upon the pleadings and proof of the amount due on the notes.

The court ordered a verdict for the plaintiff for the amount admitted to be due on the notes indorsed by the defendant. The General Term was of opinion that the defendant offered no evidence sufficient to show an improper disposition of certain securities held as collateral to the notes.

*E. N. Dickerson,*for the appellant.

*T. G. Strong,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4894 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4894

 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to increase the maximum amount 
     of marketing loan gains and loan deficiency payments that an 
      agricultural producer may receive during the 2000 crop year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2000

  Mrs. Emerson  (for herself and Mr. Berry) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to increase the maximum amount 
     of marketing loan gains and loan deficiency payments that an 
      agricultural producer may receive during the 2000 crop year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZED AMOUNT OF MARKETING LOAN GAINS AND 
              LOAN DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS.

    Section 1001(2) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (7 U.S.C. 1308(2)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``However, 
during the 2000 crop year, the total amount of such payments may not 
exceed $150,000 per person.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.41


 


Summary of the Rural Partnership
Agreement, entered into on May 7, 2019, in connection with Fazenda Chaparral


 


Parties:
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, as the current company vested in the possession of the
land, Paulimar Batista Alvarenga, as the individual interested in entering into a rural partnership with BrasilAgro – Companhia
Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, and Imobiliária Cajueiro Ltda., as the owner of the land.


 


Purpose: Granting
of the possession, for a one-year-term, counted as from August 15, 2019, of a total area equivalent to 398.00 useful hectares,
which comprises the plot of land no. 502 of Fazenda Chaparral on behalf of Mr. Paulimar Batista Alvarenga for
purposes of the exploitation of the land under a rural partnership regime, by means of the sharing, by and among the parties,
of the earnings received from the crops/harvests arising from the aforementioned partnership. Paulimar Batista Alvarenga
shall be entitled to approximately 13% of the earnings therefrom (set at an average of at least 8 bags of soybean per hectare),
and BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas shall be entitled to the remaining 87%.