alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 167.400 Off San Francisco Traffic Separation Scheme: General.

The Off San Francisco Traffic Separation Scheme consists of six parts: a Precautionary Area, a Northern Approach, a Southern Approach, a Western Approach, a Main Ship Channel, and an Area To Be Avoided. The specific areas in the Off San Francisco TSS and Precautionary Area are described in §§ 167.401 through 167.406 of this chapter. The geographic coordinates in §§ 167.401 through 167.406 are defined using North American Datum 1983 (NAD 83).
----

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ Vincent G. Miata                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |
| May 7, 2010                           |
#### JENNIE E. MESSMORE, Respondent, *v.*ABRAHAM P. BLACK, Appellant.

This is an appeal from an order entered in this action December 29, 1874, vacating an order of discontinuance and substituting one Daniel Messmore as plaintiff in the action.

The suit was brought to recover certain life insurance moneys which had been drawn by the defendant herein, and to which the plaintiff claimed to be entitled.

Upon the trial defendant by way of offset introduced in evidence what purported to be a bond signed by plaintiff, for $750, as security for rent of a certain house belonging to defendant, and which plaintiff and her husband occupied. While upon the witness stand plaintiff swore that she never executed such a bond, and that what purported to be her signature was a forgery. The judge thereupon decided that *“*in consequence of the forgery committed by plaintiff’s husband, the house-rent cannot be offset.” Under this ruling the plaintiff became entitled to judgment for between twelve and fourteen hundred dollars.

After the trial the plaintiff concluded that she might have signed the bond referred to, and she consented to take $400 in full satisfaction of her claim.

Daniel Messmore then made this application to have the action continued in his name as plaintiff, alleging that he was the owner of the claim against Black, by virtue of an assignment from the plaintiff. The General Term, in view of the conflicting statements contained in the affidavits, modified the order of the Special Term by directing a reference to take proof of the facts alleged in the affidavits, and such other evidence as might be offered, and directed the report of the referee to be made to the Special Term, ten dollars costs and disbursements of appeal to abide event; the present order to stand until further order be made on th.e coming in of the report.

*Erastus*Cooke, for the appellant.

*Moody B.*Smith, for the respondent.

*664Opinion by

Davis, P. J.

Brady and Daniels, JJ., concurred.

Ordered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey Lang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jeffrey Lang       
|Jeffrey Lang           
|Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 15, 2010
#### § 80.1140 Pillar Point Harbor, CA.

A line drawn from Pillar Point Harbor Light 6 to Pillar Point Harbor Entrance Light.

[CGD 84-091, 51 FR 7788, Mar. 6, 1986. Redesignated by CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25218, July 6, 1987]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Ch.22 – ADR for This Case?","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6hnUAURxOd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch22\/\">Ch.22 – ADR for This Case?<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/ch22\/embed\/#?secret=6hnUAURxOd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ch.22 – ADR for This Case?” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"6hnUAURxOd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32(b)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abrams Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark J. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: March 16, 2004                            /s/ Mark J. Thomas
      --------------                            ------------------
                                                Mark J. Thomas
                                                Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TyHidgNX8E\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/asbcanot\/\">Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/asbcanot\/embed\/#?secret=TyHidgNX8E\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"TyHidgNX8E\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
§ 334.1260 Dabob Bay, Whitney Point; naval restricted area. ( a ) *Dabob Bay, Whitney Point, naval restricted area* — ( 1 ) *The area.* Beginning at the high water line along the westerly shore of Dabob Bay, 100 yards northerly of the Naval control building located at approximately N. latitude 47°45′36′′ and W. longitude 122°51′00′′, thence S. 89°59′ E. 2000 yards, thence to S. 00°01′ W. 200 yards, thence N. 89°59′ W. approximately 2000 yards to the high water line 100 yards southerly of the control building.
( 2 ) *The regulations.* ( i ) No vessel shall, at any time, anchor or tow a drag of any kind in this area.
( ii ) The regulations in this paragraph shall be enforced by the Commander, Naval Base, Seattle, or his/her authorized representative.
( b ) [Reserved]
[26 FR 11203, Nov. 28, 1961. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 334.1260, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61760-CIV-SINGHAL

RUDOLPH BETANCOURT, individually,

Plaintiff,

vs.

FLANIGAN’S ENTERPRISES, INC., a 

Florida Corporation,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Joint Notice of Settlement (DE [17])

filed on November 23, 2022. The Court having carefully reviewed the file, and being 

otherwise fully advised, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-styled action is administratively 

CLOSED without prejudice to the parties to file a stipulation for dismissal by December 

28, 2022. In the event the parties fail to complete the expected settlement, either party 

may request the Court to reopen the case. Furthermore, the Court retains jurisdiction 

over the case until the settlement is consummated. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this 

case for administrative purposes only. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 28th day of 

November 2022.

Copies furnished counsel via CM/ECF

Case 0:22-cv-61760-AHS Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2022 Page 1 of 1
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS,
INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350:AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Matthew J. Espe, Chief Executive Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   August 16, 2004

|/s/ MATTHEW J. ESPEMatthew J. Espe                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LARRY BRYANT

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2042

[ February 25, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Kirk Volker , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 501998CF011995B

.

Larry Bryant, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., K LINGENSMITH

, and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American
Express Credit Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), David L. Yowan, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |                         
|------------------- | ------------------------
|/s/ David L.
 Yowan
|                   
|Name:               | David L.
 Yowan         
|Title:              | Chief
 Executive Officer
|Date:               | November 16,
 2009      

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q/A or as a separate disclosure document
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that section.
This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except
to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated
by reference in any such filing.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT
      32.2


STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Christopher Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Christopher
      Ryan


Christopher
      Ryan


Chief
      Financial Officer








Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Don WILSON and Florence Wilson, Appellees.

No. 13431.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1958.

Schmidt, Smith, Howlett & Halliday, Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellant.

Heilman & Purcell, Saginaw, Mich., for appellees.

Before SIMONS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the .oral arguments and printed briefs of the attorneys for the respective parties and upon the record in the cause;

And it appearing that the verdict of the jury, upon which judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for $2,876.53 was entered, was supported by substantial evidence to the effect that the property damage to the plaintiffs’ property resulted from windstorm within the protection of the policy;

And it appearing further that no reversible error inheres in the rulings upon the evidence, in the charge of the court, or in the conduct of the proceedings;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Litigation Risk ADR","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gHRvgYk5bp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/10-lradr\/\">Litigation Risk ADR<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/10-lradr\/embed\/#?secret=gHRvgYk5bp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Litigation Risk ADR” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"gHRvgYk5bp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                          27,888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (470)
<INVENTORY>                                     12,758
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,940
<PP&E>                                          17,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,004
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,142)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,151
<SALES>                                         69,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,335
<CGS>                                           50,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (70)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (70)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (70)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2021 Page 1 of 1
#### EUGENE MIANNAY, Respondent, *v.*JOSIAH FLETCHER AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS.

Appeal from a j udgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

The General Term *held,*that the findings of the referee were justified by the evidence,, and affirmed the judgment.

*J. K. Hayward,*for the appellants.

*D. R. Jaques,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed.