alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 164.39 Steering gear: Foreign tankers. ( a ) This section applies to each foreign tanker of 10,000 gross tons or more, except a public vessel, that— ( 1 ) Transfers oil at a port or place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; or
( 2 ) Otherwise enters or operates in the navigable waters of the United States, except a vessel described by § 164.02 of this part.
( b ) *Definitions.* The terms used in this section are as follows: *Constructed* means the same as in Chapter II-1, Regulations 1.1.2 and 1.1.3.1, of SOLAS 74.
*Existing tanker* means a tanker— ( 1 ) For which the building contract is placed on or after June 1, 1979;
( 2 ) In the absence of a building contract, the keel of which is laid or which is at a similar stage of construction on or after January 1, 1980;
( 3 ) The delivery of which occurs on or after June 1, 1982; or
( 4 ) That has undergone a major conversion contracted for on or after June 1, 1979; or construction of which was begun on or after January 1, 1980, or completed on or after June 1, 1982.
*Public vessel, oil, hazardous materials,* and *foreign vessel* mean the same as in 46 U.S.C. 2101.
*SOLAS 74* means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended.
*Tanker* means a self-propelled vessel defined as a tanker by 46 U.S.C. 2101(38) or as a tank vessel by 46 U.S.C. 2101(39).
( c ) Each tanker constructed on or after September 1, 1984, must meet the applicable requirements of Chapter II-1, Regulations 29 and 30, of SOLAS 74.
( d ) Each tanker constructed before September 1, 1984, must meet the requirements of Chapter II-1, Regulation 29.19, of SOLAS 74.
( e ) Each tanker of 40,000 gross tons or more, constructed before September 1, 1984, that does not meet the single-failure criterion of Chapter II-1, Regulation 29.16, of SOLAS 74, must meet the requirements of Chapter II-1, Regulation 29.20, of SOLAS 74.
( f ) Each tanker constructed before September 1, 1984, must meet the applicable requirements of Chapter II-1, Regulations 29.14 and 29.15, of SOLAS 74.
[CGD 83-043, 60 FR 24771, May 10, 1995]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 113 (Monday, June 12, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36835-36836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Cancer Institute Board of Scientific Advisors.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation of other reasonable 
accommodations, should

[[Page 36836]]

notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.


    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Board of Scientific 
Advisors.
    Date: June 22, 2000.
    Time: 8:30 AM to 6:00 PM.
    Agenda: Report of the Director, NCI; Ongoing and New Business, 
Special Initiative Updates, Budget Presentation, and RFA Concept 
Reviews.
    Place: 900 Rockville, Pike, Building 31, Conference Room 10, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Paulette S. Gray, PhD, Executive Secretary, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 8141, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to scheduling changes.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 2, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-14747 Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Forest Service performance andaccountability report**
 
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.1/3:
Item Number:0080 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000586370
 
December 18, 2019
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Other Ombuds & ADR Organizations","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HdWHWpbVUf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/other-ombuds-and-adr-organizations\/\">Other Ombuds & ADR Organizations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/other-ombuds-and-adr-organizations\/embed\/#?secret=HdWHWpbVUf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Other Ombuds & ADR Organizations” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"HdWHWpbVUf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
#### § 144.01-5 Location and launching of life floats.

The life floats shall be distributed in accessible locations and mounted on the outboard sides of the working platform in such a manner as to be readily launched.

[CGFR 56-4, 21 FR 903, Feb. 9, 1956]
**Exhibit 32.1**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of America Online Latin America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Charles Herington, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,and Osvaldo Baños, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:
(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act or 1934; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ CHARLES M. HERINGTON   Charles M. Herington   Chief Executive Officer            /s/ OSVALDO BAÑOS   Osvaldo Baños   Chief Financial Officer   
Date: March 29, 2005
79–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–120 

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO 

THE BILL (H.R. 627) TO AMEND THE TRUTH IN LENDING ACT TO ESTABLISH FAIR AND TRANSPARENT PRACTICES RELATING TO THE EXTENSION OF CREDIT UNDER AN OPEN END CONSUMER CREDIT PLAN, AND 

FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

MAY 19, 2009.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. PINGREE, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 456] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 456, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 

amendment to H.R. 627, the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Act 

of 2009. The resolution makes in order a motion by the Chairman 

of the Committee on Financial Services to concur in the Senate 

amendment. The resolution waives all points of order against the 

motion except clause 10 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that 

the Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. 

The resolution provides one hour of debate on the motion equally 

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services. The resolution provides that the question of adoption of the motion shall be divided 

for a separate vote on concurring in section 512 of the Senate 

amendment. The resolution further provides that if either portion 

of the divided question fails of adoption, then the House shall be 

considered to have made no disposition of the Senate amendment. 

The resolution provides that House Resolution 450 is laid on the 

table. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the motion (except for clause 10 of rule XXI) the Committee is 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with REPORTS
2 

not aware of any points of order against the motion. The waiver of 

all points of order against the motion is prophylactic. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with REPORTS
#### JOSEPH H. HAVENS, Respondent, *v.*THE NATIONAL CITY BANK OF BROOKLYN, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

*Code,*§ *294—National Bank—power of State court oner—bankruptcy.*

Where a judgment has been recovered against an assignee in bankruptcy, an order cannot be made, under section 294 of the Code, requiring a bank, a depository of United States funds, to pay over to the judgment creditor money belonging to the estate of the bankrupt, deposited by the assignee with it.

Appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate an order made in supplementary proceedings, requiring the appellant to pay over certain money to the respondent’s attorney.

*132
      *W. H. Hollis,*for the appellant.

*John H. Bergen*and *E. L.*Sanderson, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Gilbert and Tappen, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs.
**MEETING AGENDA**

**TUESDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2019**

**9:30 AM – 12:30 PM**

****

I. Opening Remarks from Chair (10 min)

· Assistant Secretary for Aging Lance Robertson, United States Department of Health and Human Services, and Administrator of the Administration for Community Living

II. Presentation on Elder Abuse in Different Settings (30 min) 

· Dr. Pamela Teaster, Virginia Tech 

· Robert B. Blancato, National Coordinator for the Elder Justice Coalition 

· Lori Smetanka, Executive Director of Consumer Voice 

III. EJCC Member Remarks and Updates (50 min)

· United States Department of Justice

· Social Security Administration

· United States Department of the Interior 

· Corporation for National and Community Service

· United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

· Security and Exchange Commission

· United States Postal Inspection Service

IV. Presentation of 2018 National Adult Maltreatment Reporting System (NAMRS) Data Report (20 min)

· Facilitated by Hilary Dalin and Scott Cory (ACL)

V. EJCC Member Remarks and Updates (50 min) 

· United States Department of the Treasury 

· Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

· United States Department of Labor

· Federal Trade Commission

· United States Department of Agriculture

· United States Department of Veterans Affairs

· United States Department of Health and Human Services 

VI. Closing Remarks (10 min)

· Assistant Secretary for Aging Lance Robertson, United States Department of Health and Human Services, and Administrator of the Administration for Community Living

# image1.jpeg
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6329

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GREGORY ALLEN MILTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:00-cv-00031-SGW-GC; 5:95-cr-70074-SGW-1)

Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 24, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Allen Milton, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Milton seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration

of the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and denying his subsequent Fed. R.

Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The orders are not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369

(4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Milton has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4761 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4761

To designate the existing visitor's center building located within the 
boundaries of the Valley Forge National Historical Park at Route 23 and 
  North Gulph Road in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, as the ``Richard T. 
                      Schulze Visitor's Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2000

  Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the existing visitor's center building located within the 
boundaries of the Valley Forge National Historical Park at Route 23 and 
  North Gulph Road in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, as the ``Richard T. 
                      Schulze Visitor's Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF EXISTING VISITOR CENTER AT VALLEY FORGE 
              NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    (a) Designation.--The existing visitor's center building located 
within the boundaries of the Valley Forge National Historical Park at 
Route 23 and North Gulph Road in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Richard T. Schulze Visitor's Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard T. 
Schulze Visitor's Center''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 163.20 Bunching of tows. ( a ) In all cases where tows can be bunched, it should be done.
( b ) Tows navigating in the North and East Rivers of New York must be bunched above a line drawn between Robbins Reef Light and Owls Head, Brooklyn, but the quarantine anchorage and the north entrance to Ambrose Channel shall be avoided in the process of bunching tows.
( c ) Tows must be bunched above the mouth of the Schuylkill River, Pa.
[CGFR 60-61, 25 FR 9045, Sept. 21, 1960, as amended by CGFR 64-21, 29 FR 5733, Apr. 30, 1964. Redesignated by CGD 81-017, 46 FR 28154, May 26, 1981]
PUBLIC LAW 111–18—MAY 8, 2009 123 STAT. 1611 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 39: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Mar. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Apr. 21, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–18 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To repeal section 10(f) of Public Law 93–531, commonly known as the ‘‘Bennett 

Freeze’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE BENNETT FREEZE. 

Section 10(f) of Public Law 93–531 (25 U.S.C. 640d–9(f)) is 

repealed. 

Approved May 8, 2009. 

May 8, 2009 

[S. 39] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLIC LAW
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4975

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2000

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal 
 Square, Newark, New Jersey, as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg Post Office 
                           and Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal Square, Newark, 
New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg 
Post Office and Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the post office and courthouse referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Frank R. 
Lautenberg Post Office and Courthouse.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
DEPARTMENT OF 

TnANSPQRTATlON 

JGKET OPERATIONS 

ZGiO A 10=22 

I 

I 

.'<'£li.> 

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 

Olii Rccr. Ci:> Hpd 

124 V.'. Uic'-;9DlAvonuo 

Lan:rs. f-'jcn^ir <;BU33-IU'J« 

i0K;i'>«3-1"'< trace) 

i;S1 Vj '.Si^<CK& iKA«j 

s 

if 

Virg Bfirnfix-. Mr.yo' 

August 27,2009 

Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secreta^' of Ttaa^portation 

U.S. Departmenl of Tnnspoitztion 

4O0 seremfa Street SW 

Washuigton, DC 20590 

Dear Seactziy LaHood, 

Please accept this lettei of support for the SnuU Conmnmity Air Senice Dexclopseiit Prc^jazD appUcation submitted 

by Capital Regioc bitemational Airport (CRIA). Tbe S7S0,0G0 gruil nill help fimd a plaa to establish essential direct 

air service between t jTy.ing acd United Airline's hub at Washin^n Dulles Inlemational Airport. Despite diat 

Washington, D.C. is the tnTrntim- one destination for business air tra\^ers in the region, Lansing remains tvithout 

direct senic« to otir nation's capital. 

The Greater I Jty.ing area is home to Michigan's state government, sev'cral major insurance companies, Michigan 

State Univeruty, Genera] Motors and himdteds of state associatioos sumiuiided by a vibrant corporate community. 

As Mayor of Lansing, I have first-hand knonrledge of die inqKBtance our commmiity leaders place on regular air 

trav^ to Washington, D.C. The v-ohune of travel to Washington by these organizations and our large business 

ccnmnmitT makes direct air service between f ^ttrrng md Washington a \ital need for our coimnnnity. 

The CRIA is one ofoor most prized regional operations, tian!^>orling hundreds of thousands of passengers and 

thousands of toss of cargo annually. Tbe aiipott already brings a poarerful economic contribution, taking in 

approximately SI billian foi^ our region each \'ear. The addition of direct service to Washington, D.C. ironld only 

increase tbe ox-erall economic impact. 

I have met nith CRIA EzecQti\T Director Robcit SeUg on this isstis and I extend my total 9qq>oit of his efEorts to 

impro\-e the airport's v^ahie to the community-. I am confident dizt the CRIA proposal vrill be carefully revieind and 

that its merit vnll be coosidered. Our comonmil)' lo^ s forward to the cppoitunit}' to benefit fiom critical direct air 

ser\icc to Washiogton, D.C. Thank v-oa in advance for )-our time and consideiatian. 

If you have any questions, please fee! free to contact me directly. 

Sincerelj', 

VirgBcrntro 

Mayor of Lansing 

"tqjal Opportuwy-limpicyer' 

Capital Region International Airport, Lansing, Micliigan 

Snfiall Community Air Service Development Program Proposal • 2010 

57