alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Senior Nutrition Program Activity Guide:

Nutritionary

This activity is a nutrition spin on the classic game PictionaryTM. Socialization is one key 

to wellness, and this is a great way to get nutrition program participants engaged and 

connected–even at a distance!

Coordination

Assign a coordinator to plan and manage the game.

Identify three gameday volunteers – two team leaders 

and a time/score keeper.

Select a time and date for the event.

Set up a free virtual event on a video platform (e.g., 

Zoom meeting).

Create a sign-up form and promote the event.

Schedule a practice event to ensure team leaders are 

comfortable with the digital whiteboard.

Remind participants the day before the event.

Start the event 30 minutes early to troubleshoot any 

technical issues.

Game Play

Once everyone has joined the meeting, the Coordinator 

should start the event with a quick overview of how the 

game works and roles of the team leaders and time/score 

keeper. Divide seniors into two teams. Below are basic 

steps for playing the game. You can also check the normal 

PictionaryTM rules for ideas.

• Decide which team goes first by having each team 

leader guess a number between 0 and 20. The 

closest without going over the number written down in 

advance by the moderator goes first.

• The coordinator sends a word to that team leader 

through private chat (make sure it is private!).

• The timekeeper starts timer (suggested: 60 seconds) 

and the team leader begins to draw. If anyone on that 

team guesses the word in time, they get one point. 

• Teams continue to take turns drawing/guessing until 

one team wins the game. You can choose to end 

the game when one team reaches a predetermined 

number of winning points, you’ve played a preset 

number of rounds, or a certain amount of time has 

passed.

Subject Ideas 

Below are some easy food words to draw. Depending on 

your group, you may also want to use phrases (e.g., an 

apple a day keeps the doctor away), give hints before 

drawing (e.g., dairy), and/or award extra points for 

answering a follow-up question (e.g., how many servings 

of fruits/vegetables should you have each day?).

• Dairy Group: Milk, cheese, yogurt, ice cream

• Protein Group: Chicken, peanut butter, fish, eggs, 

hamburger, steak

• Vegetable Group: Broccoli, corn, carrot, potato, 

tomato, lettuce, asparagus

• Fruits Group: Grapes, orange, banana, strawberry, 

watermelon, cherries

• Grains Group: Bread, spaghetti, noodles, tacos, corn 

flakes, waffle

The Administration for Community Living (ACL) is an operating division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human 

Services. ACL administers the National Senior Nutrition Program, which is funded by the Older Americans Act. ACL.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,010,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               52,692,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,160,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            78,343,000
<PP&E>                                       3,057,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,887,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,304,000
<BONDS>                                      7,429,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       10,490,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,028,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,010,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,887,000
<SALES>                                    131,391,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           131,391,000
<CGS>                                      102,437,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              102,437,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,713,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             904,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,337,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   615,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            722,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   722,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4955

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow States to regulate tow

truck operations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 25, 2000

Mr. MORAN of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow States

to regulate tow truck operations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 14501(c)(2)(C) is amended by striking ‘‘the

4 price of’’ and all that follows through ‘‘transportation is’’

5 and inserting ‘‘regulation of tow truck operations whether

6 or not such operations are’’.

Æ
§ 66.01-40 Exemptions. ( a ) Nothing in the preceding sections of this subpart shall be construed to interfere with or nullify the requirements of existing laws and regulations pertaining to the marking of structures, vessels and other obstructions sunken in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States (Part 64 of this subchapter), the marking of artificial islands and structures which are erected on or over the seabed and subsoil of the Outer Continental Shelf (Part 67 of this subchapter), or the lighting of bridges over navigable waters of the United States (Subchapter J of this subchapter).
( b ) Persons marking bridges pursuant to Subchapter J of this title are exempted from the provisions of § 66.01-5.
[CGD 78-156, 48 FR 11268, Mar. 17, 1983]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105



### March 19, 2010

In Reply AIR-3 Refer To: SAC 06-01

Rob Simpson 27126 Grandview Avenue Hayward CA. 94542

RE: Final Amended PSD Permit for the Colusa Generating Station

Dear Mr. Simpson:

Enclosed is an Amended PSD Permit issu ed in accordance with the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 7401 et. seq. ), for the construction and operation the Co lusa Generating Station (CGS) in Colusa County, California. This Amended PSD Permit revises the PSD permit that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 (EPA) issued for the CGS on September 29, 2008. You are receiving this letter because you submitte d written comments to EPA during the public comment period on our proposed revisions to the permit (Draft Amended Permit).

EPA issued the final Amended PSD Permit for CGS on March 19, 2010. We have enclosed a copy of our responses to comment s on the Draft Amended Permit. The Amended PSD Permit, our responses to comments, and othe r relevant documents, including the index to the administrative record for this ac tion, are available on EPA’s website at http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/permit/r9-permits-issued.html . All of these documents and the entire administrative record for this action ar e also available upon reque st at the EPA Region 9 Office by contacting Shaheerah Kelly at (415) 947-4156 or kell y.shaheerah@epa.gov

.
In accordance with 40 CFR § 124.15(b), this Amended PSD Permit will become effective 30 days after the date of issuan ce, unless the permit is timely appealed. Pursuant to 40 CFR § 124.19, within 30 days after the final permit decision has been issued, any person who commented on the Draft Amended Permit may peti tion the Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) to review any condition of the permit decision. Any person who failed to file comments on the Draft Amended Permit may petition for administrative review only to the extent of the changes from the draft to the final permit decision. More information about petitioning the EAB can be found at http://www.epa.gov/eab/

. A petition to the EAB must include a st atement of the reasons supporting review, including a demonstration that a ny issues raised in the petitio n were raised during the publiccomment period to the extent required by the regulations and, when appropriate,a showing that the permit condition in question is based on:

(1) A finding of fact or conclusion Of law which is clearly erroneous; or

(2) An exercise of discretion or an important policy consideration which the EAB should, in its discretion, review.

If you have any questions about this final permit decision, please contact Shaheerah Kelly ofthe Permits Office at (415) 947-4156.

Enclosures: (1) Final Amended PSD Permit (2) Response to Comments , e'erardo 

# c. Rios Chief, Permits Office Air Division

- 2 -
L'^rr CF nr^^f) •^'pHlriJION 

BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

) 

Nondiscrimination on the Basis of ) Docket OST-2008-0273 

Disability in Air Travel; Final Rule ) 

.) 

MOTION OF 

AEROVf AS DEL CONTINENTE AMERICANO SA AVIANCA 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

Richard D. Mathias 

David M. Endersbee 

ZUCKERT, SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, 

L.L.P. 

888 17"'Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

Tel: 202-298-8660 

Fax: 202-342-0683 

Email: rdmathias@zsrlaw.com 

dmendersbee(@2srlaw.com 

Counsel for Aerovias del Continente 

Americano SA Avianca 

April 9, 2010 
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Nondiscrimination on the Basis of 

Disability in Air Travel; Final Rule 

) 

) Docket OST-2008-0273 

) 

J 

MOTION OF 

AEROVIAS DEL CONTINENTE AMERICANO SA AVIANCA 

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT 

Aerovias del Continente Americano SA Avianca ("Avianca") respectfully moves, 

pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 302.12, for confidential treatment of certain information submitted in 

connection with Avianca's Application for an Equivalent Alternative Determination (the 

"Application"), which is being submitted concurrently. 

The confidential information for which confidential treatment is being requested are 

separately enclosed in an envelope marked "Confidential Treatment Requested Under §302.12.' 

Subsection (b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") exempts "trade secrets 

and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential" 

firom public disclosure. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4). The aircraft delivery schedule for which 

confidential treatment is requested clearly meets this standard because it is: (1) commercial or 

financial information, (2) obtained fix>m a person outside the government, and (3) privileged or 

confidential. Release of this detailed data would cause Avianca competitive harm. 
Motion of Aerovias Del Continente Americano S.A. 

For Confidential Treatment 

April 12.2010 

WHEREFORE, Aerovias del Continente Americano SA Avianca respectfiilly requests 

the Department treat as confidential the information more fully described above. 

Respectfiilly submitted, 

'^J/<-

Richard D. Mathias 

David M. Endersbee 

ZUCKERT, SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, 

L.L.P. 

888 17"'Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

Tel: 202-298-8660 

Fax: 202-342-0683 

Email: rdmathias(5).zsrlaw.com 

dmender^bee@zsrlaw.com 

Counsel for Aerovias del Continente 

Americano SA Avianca 

April 9,2010
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 1:22-cv-22967-BB

SHANNA BYNES,

Plaintiff,

v.

RGS FINANCIAL INC,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF

DEFENDANT’S OFFER OF JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Shanna Bynes (“Plaintiff”) submits this Notice of Acceptance of the Offer of 

Judgment served by Defendant RGS Financial Inc (“Defendant”) October 07, 2022.

1. Attached as Exhibit “A” is a copy of the Offer of Judgment.

2. Plaintiff has accepted the Offer of Judgment.

3. Pursuant to the Offer of Judgment, “Judgment shall be entered against Defendant 

in the amount of One Thousand and One Dollars ($1,001.00), plus reasonable attorney’s fees and 

taxable costs incurred in this action prior to expiration of this offer, such fees and costs to be 

determined by agreement of the parties and, if the parties cannot agree, by the Court upon Motion 

of the Plaintiff.” See Exhibit A at ¶ 1.

4. In light of Plaintiff’s acceptance of the Offer of Judgment, the sole remaining issue 

before this Court is the issue of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs Plaintiff is entitled pursuant 

to the terms of the Offer of Judgment. 

5. Plaintiff and Defendant shall confer, in good faith, in an attempt to resolve, or 

otherwise narrow, the issue of reasonable attorney fees and costs without this Court’s intervention. 

Case 1:22-cv-22967-BB Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2022 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DATED: October 20, 2022

Respectfully Submitted,

 /s/ Thomas Patti .

THOMAS PATTI, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 118377

E-mail: Tom@pzlg.legal

VICTOR ZABALETA, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 118517

E-mail: Victor@pzlg.legal

PATTI ZABALETA LAW GROUP

3323 Northwest 55th Street

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309

Phone: 561-542-8550

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on October 20, 2022, the foregoing was electronically 

filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic 

filing to all counsel of record.

 /s/ Thomas J. Patti .

THOMAS J. PATTI, ESQ.

Florida Bar No.: 118377

Case 1:22-cv-22967-BB Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2022 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Voluntary Customer Surveys in Accordance with 
E.O. 12862.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: G-201.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0192.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 7/31/2000.
    (5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other-for-
profit, Regulatory or Compliance.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 2,050.
    (8) Total annual responses: 2,050.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 727.
    (10) Collection description: The Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) 
utilizes voluntary customer surveys to ascertain customer satisfaction 
with the RRB in terms of timeliness, appropriateness, access, and other 
measures of quality service. Surveys involve individuals that are 
direct or indirect beneficiaries of RRB services as well as railroad 
employers who must report earnings.
    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS:
    Copies of the forms and supporting documents can be obtained from 
Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance officer (312-751-3363). Comments 
regarding the information collection should be addressed to Ronald J. 
Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, 
Illinois, 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, Joe Lackey (202-395-7316), 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10230, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.

Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 00-14413 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.953 Brazos River (Diversion Channel). ( a ) The draw of the S36 highway bridge, mile 4.4 at Freeport, shall open on signal if at least 12 hours notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the Union Pacific railroad bridge, mile 22.6 at Brazoria, need not be opened for the passage of vessels.
§ 64.03 Scope. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section these rules apply to: ( 1 ) Structures located in or over waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and, on the high seas, structures owned or operated by persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States;
( 2 ) Sunken vessels in the navigable waters or waters above the continental shelf of the United States; and
( 3 ) Other obstructions existing on or in the navigable waters or waters above the continental shelf of the United States.
( b ) The following obstructions are exempt from the requirements of this part: ( 1 ) Dredging pipelines subject to subchapter E of this chapter;
( 2 ) Bridges subject to subchapter J of this chapter;
( 3 ) Vessels subject to the International Regulations for preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (1972 COLREGS) or the Inland Navigation Rules;
( 4 ) Deepwater port facilities subject to subchapter NN of this chapter; and
( 5 ) Artificial islands and structures subject to Part 67 of this subchapter.
[CGD 78-156, 48 FR 11267, Mar. 17, 1983, as amended by USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35080, July 28, 2017]
#### § 181.27 Information displayed near hull identification number.

With the exception of the characters “US-”, which constitute the country of origin code for the United States, if information is displayed on the boat within 2 inches of the 12-character hull identification number (HIN), that information must be separated from the HIN by means of borders or must be on a separate label, so that it will not be interpreted as part of the hull identification number.

[USCG-2003-14272, 69 FR 33860, June 17, 2004]
9/6/2013 123-87582

New Hope Power Company

Heat

Fuel Heat Input Output

(MMBtu/hr) (MMBtu/hr)

No. 2 Fuel Oil 589 501 4,331 gal/hr

Natural Gas 589 501 577,532 scf/hr

(MMBtu/hr) (MMBtu/hr)

No. 2 Fuel Oil 536 455 3,938 gal/hr

Natural Gas 536 455 525,029 scf/hr

 (MMBtu/yr) (MMBtu/yr)

MAXIMUM NATURAL GAS FIRING

Natural Gas 4,691,238 3,987,552 4,599 MMscf/yr

No. 2 Fuel Oil 0 0 0 gal/yr

 TOTAL 4,691,238 3,987,552

MAXIMUM OIL FIRING (700 hours)

Natural Gas 4,316,367 3,668,912 4,232 MMscf/yr

No. 2 Fuel Oil 374,871 318,640 2,756,401 gal/yr

 TOTAL 4,691,238 3,987,552

Net Steam Enthalpy = 1460 - 322 = 1,138 Btu/lb

c Maximum 1-hour heat input based on 440,000 lb/hr steam. 

 Maximum 24-hour and annual average based on 400,000 lb/hr steam.

Total heat input required = 589 MMBtu/hr; 1-hr

536 MMBtu/hr; 24-hr

4,691,238 MMBtu/yr

Total heat output required = 3,987,552 MMBtu/yr 

Fuels may be burned in combination, not to exceed total heat outputs.

Based on fuel heating values as follows:

No. 2 Fuel Oil - 136,000 Btu/gal

Natural gas - 1,020 Btu/scf

Table 2-1. Maximum Fuel Usage and Heat Input Rates for New Natural Gas-Fired Boiler (rev 9/6/13)

Heat

Transfer

Efficiency

(%)

 Maximum 24-Hour c

85

85

85

85

Fuel Firing Rate

85

85

85

85

 Annual Average c

 Maximum 1-Hour c

C:\Users\DBuff\Documents\New Hope Power\Natural Gas Boiler 2012\NHPC Tables rev 700 hrs fuel oil.xlsx
§ 245.25 Determination of remedial action. ( a ) *Consultation with Coast Guard.* After a determination has been made that an obstruction presents a hazard to navigation, District Engineers will consult with the Coast Guard district to determine appropriate remedial action for the specific situation.
( b ) *Options.* The following options, or some combination of these options, may be considered: ( 1 ) No action.
( 2 ) Charting.
( 3 ) Broadcast notice to mariners and publication of navigational safety information.
( 4 ) Marking.
( 5 ) Redefinition of navigational area (e.g., channel, fairway, anchorage, etc.).
( 6 ) Removal.
Exhibit 4.46


 


Summary
of the Rural Partnership Agreement, entered into on July 26, 2019, in connection with Fazenda Arrojadinho


 


Parties:
BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas, as the company interested in entering into a rural partnership
with Agrifirma Bahia Agropecuária Ltda., and Agrifirma Brasil Agropecuária, as the owner of the land.


 


Purpose:
Granting of the possession, for a one-year term, of a total area equivalent to 3,000 useful hectares of Fazenda Arrojadinho for
purposes of the exploitation of the land under a rural partnership regime, by means of the sharing, by and among the parties,
of the earnings received from the crops/harvests arising from the aforementioned partnership. BrasilAgro – Companhia Brasileira
de Propriedades Agrícolas shall be entitled to approximately 15% of the earnings therefrom (set at an average of 7.5 bags
of soybean per hectare) plus an additional bonus equivalent to 50% of the production that exceeds 35 bags of soybean per hectare,
and Agrifirma shall be entitled to the remaining 85% of the earnings therefrom.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22893-SCOLA/GOODMAN

JOAN RILEY, and LINDA SCOTT, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs

v. 

HERITAGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Mark A. Salky, Esq. of the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, 

P.A., hereby appears for Defendant Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company in the 

above-titled action. It is hereby requested that all further pleadings, court filings and other papers 

be served via the Court’s ECF filing system or at the address below.

Date: October 7, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A.

333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 4400

Miami, Florida 33131

Telephone: (305) 579-0816

Facsimile: (305) 579-0717

By: /s/ Mark A. Salky

MARK A. SALKY

Florida Bar No. 58221

Email: salkym@gtlaw.com 

Counsel for Defendant Heritage 

Property & Casualty Insurance 

Company

Case 1:22-cv-22893-RNS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/07/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 7th day of October 2022, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is 

being served this day on counsel of record identified below either via transmission of Notices of 

Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF, or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or 

parties who are not authorized to receive Notices of Electronic Filing.

/s/ Mark A. Salky 

MARK A. SALKY

SERVICE LIST

Frank R. Rodríguez

Rodríguez Tramont & Nuñez, P.A.

255 Alhambra Circle

Suite 1150

Coral Gables, FL 33134

305-350-2300

Fax: 305-350-2525

Email: pan@rtgn-law.com

Jason K. Kellogg, P.A.

Levine Kellogg Lehman 

Schneider & Grossman LLP

200 Southeast 2nd Avenue

Miami Tower, 36th Floor

Miami, FL 33131

305-403-8788

Fax: 305-403-8789

Email: jk@lklsg.com

Michael C. Knecht

Knecht Law Group

658 W. Indiantown Road, Suite 211

Jupiter, Florida 33458

561-745-2110

Email: mck@mikeknecht.com

Email: susan@mikeknecht.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Case 1:22-cv-22893-RNS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/07/2022 Page 2 of 2