alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed a part of the Report or
"filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


By          /s/ PAUL G. DRISCOLL
         ------------------------------
                Paul G. Driscoll
               Vice President and
             Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  August 5, 2008




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and will
be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31(b)CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Rick A. Paternostro, certify that: 1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Servidyne, Inc.;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;   b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materialaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):  a.   All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and   b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: March 17, 2008 /s/ Rick A. Paternostro   Rick A. Paternostro   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99
PRESS RELEASE


Contact:

Richard P. Becht
(716) 655-3800


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


              ACME ELECTRIC ANNOUNCES SECOND-QUARTER RESULTS


    EAST AURORA, N.Y., January 23, 1998 -- Acme Electric Corporation
(NYSE:ACE) announced today that, for the second quarter of its 1998 fiscal
year ended December 27, 1997, net sales were $22,752,000, compared to
$23,478,000 for the comparable period of the previous year, with net income
of $498,000, or $.10 per share, compared to net income of $84,000, or $.02
per share the previous year.  Net sales for the twenty-six-week period
ended December 27, 1997, were $44,931,000, compared with $46,701,000 for
the comparable period of the previous year.  Net income for the twenty-six-
week period ended December 27, 1997, was $668,000, or $.13 per share,
compared with a net income of $90,000, or $.02 per share, for the
comparable period of the previous year.
    Robert J. McKenna, Chairman and CEO, stated that, "We are continuing
our efforts to replace lower-margin business with new business yielding
higher returns, and so, although sales appear level, we have made an
improvement in the quality of the overall product mix."  McKenna added
that, "We are encouraged by the progress being made on all fronts and look
forward to improved performance this year."
    Founded in 1917, Acme Electric Corporation is a leader in the design
and manufacture of power conversion products for electronic and electrical
systems for industrial, commercial, residential, and military and aerospace
applications.  Corporate headquarters are in East Aurora, N.Y., with
operations in Cuba, N.Y., Lumberton, N.C. and Tempe, Ariz.  Company news is
available by FAX: dial 1-800-758-5804, and input extension 006675; or visit
our web site at acmeelec.com
                                  # # # #<PAGE>

ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION

Comparative Analysis
(in thousands, except for per share data)




                       13 Weeks      13 Weeks      26 Weeks      26 Weeks
                        Ended         Ended         Ended         Ended
                       12/27/97      12/27/96      12/27/97      12/27/96
                       --------      --------      --------      --------

Net Sales               $22,752       $23,478       $44,931       $46,701
Net Income                  498            84           668            90
Net Income Per Common Share
  (Basic and Diluted)      $.10          $.02          $.13          $.02
Weighted Number of Shares    
  Outstanding Used to Compute Net
  Income Per Common Share:
    Basic             5,044,323     4,952,961     5,043,173     4,948,928
    Diluted           5,059,380     4,965,378     5,058,119     4,961,463
§ 334.595 Atlantic Ocean off Cape Canaveral; 45th Space Wing, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The restricted area shall encompass all navigable waters of the United States, as defined at 33 CFR part 329, contiguous to the area offshore of Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida. The area is bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates: Commencing from the shoreline at the northwest portion of the area, at latitude 28°35.008′ N, longitude 80°34.448′ W, thence directly to latitude 28°35.716′ N, longitude 80°32.938′ W, thence following the mean high water line at a distance of 1.5 nautical miles offshore proceed southerly to a point at latitude 28°24.187′ N, longitude 80°33.443′ W, thence proceeding westerly to terminate at a point on the shoreline at latitude 28°24.69′ N, longitude 80°35.05′ W.
( b ) *The regulation.* ( 1 ) The area described in paragraph (a) of this section will be closed when it is deemed necessary by the Commander, 45th Space Wing or his/her designee to address any perceived threat to the local area. With the exception of local, State, and Federal law enforcement entities, all persons, vessels, and other craft are prohibited from entering, transiting, anchoring, or drifting within the restricted area when it is closed without the permission of the Commander, 45th Space Wing or his/her designee.
( 2 ) Due to the nature of this restricted area, closures may occur with very little advance notice. Closure of the area shall be noticed by the display of a red ball and red beacon from a 90-foot pole near the shoreline at approximately latitude 28°35.0′ N, longitude 80°34.8′ W and from a 90-foot pole near the shoreline at approximately latitude 28°25.3′ N, longitude 80°35.0′ W. Information will be provided via marine radio broadcast and a warning statement displayed on an electronic marquee sign located on the north side of the Port Canaveral ship channel between the Trident and Poseidon Wharf during the duration of the area closure.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, 45th Space Wing, Patrick Air Force Base, Florida and/or such persons or agencies as he/she may designate.
[74 FR 36401, July 23, 2009; 74 FR 58849, Nov. 16, 2009]
Exhibit 31(a)CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Alan R. Abrams, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Abrams Industries, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by other within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: December 15, 2005 /s/ Alan R. Abrams   Alan R. Abrams   Chief Executive Officer
§ 52.21 General requirements. ( a ) An application for correction of a Coast Guard record shall be submitted on DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military or Naval Record) or an exact copy thereof, and shall be addressed to: DHS Office of the General Counsel, Board for Correction of Military Records, 2707 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Stop 0485, Washington, DC 20528-0485. Forms and explanatory material may be obtained from the Chair of the Board.
( b ) The application shall be signed by the person alleging error or injustice in his or her military record, except that an application may be signed by a family member or legal representative with respect to the record of a deceased, incapacitated, or missing person. The family member or legal representative must submit proof of his or her proper interest with the application.
( c ) No application shall be docketed or processed until it is complete. An application for relief is complete when all of the following have been received by the Board: ( 1 ) A signed DD Form 149, providing all necessary responses, including a specific allegation of error or injustice, accompanied by substantial evidence or information in support of such allegation;
( 2 ) The military records of the applicant; and
( 3 ) Any applicable military and Department of Veterans Affairs medical records.
( d ) It is the applicant's responsibility to include his or her correct mailing address on the DD Form 149 and to inform the Chair in writing of any subsequent change of address until the Board or the Secretary takes final action on the application.
( e ) Briefs in support of applications must be assembled in a manner that permits easy reproduction and may not exceed twenty-five double-spaced typewritten pages in a type size with no more than twelve characters per inch. This limitation does not apply to supporting documentary evidence. In complex cases, the Chair may waive this limitation.
[OST Doc. No. 2002-13439, 68 FR 9886, Mar. 3, 2003, as amended by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38431, July 7, 2014; USCG-2019-0929, 84 FR 68343, Dec. 16, 2019]
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Onvia.com, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Pickett, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    MICHAEL D.
PICKETTMichael D. Pickett Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and Acting Chief Financial Officer March 25, 2003
JOINDER
AGREEMENT


 


The
undersigned is executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement (this “Joinder Agreement”) pursuant to
Section 6.10 of that certain Merger Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), is entered into
by and among (i) Reliability Incorporated, a Texas corporation (“Reliability”), (ii) R-M Merger Sub, Inc., a Virginia
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Reliability (“Merger Sub”), (iii) The Maslow Media Group, Inc., a Virginia
corporation (“Maslow”), (iv) Jeffrey Eberwein (“Mr. Eberwein”), for the limited purposes as set forth
therein; (v) Naveen Doki (“Mr. Doki”) for the limited purposes as set forth therein, and (vii) Silvija Valleru (“Ms.
Valleru” and, together with Mr. Doki, the “Shareholders”) for the limited purposes as set forth therein (the
“Merger Agreement.). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Merger
Agreement


 


By
executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement, the undersigned hereby acknowledges, agrees and confirms that, pursuant to Section
6.10 of the Merger Agreement, the undersigned will be deemed to be a “New Shareholder” to the Merger Agreement as
defined therein, for all purposes of the Merger Agreement, and shall have all of the obligations of a New Shareholder thereunder
as if the undersigned had executed the Merger Agreement. The undersigned hereby ratifies, as of the date hereof, and agrees to
be bound by, all of the terms, provisions and conditions applicable to New Shareholders contained in the Merger Agreement.


 


Accordingly,
the undersigned has executed and delivered this Joinder Agreement as of the 22nd day of October, 2019.


 


	 	Holder:
    Igly Trust
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Kalyan Pathuri
	 	Name:	Kalyan
    Pathuri
	 	Title:	Trustee
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4900

To make certain adjustments to the boundaries of the Mount Nebo Wilderness

Area, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 2000

Mr. HANSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To make certain adjustments to the boundaries of the Mount

Nebo Wilderness Area, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mount Nebo Wilder5 ness Boundary Adjustment Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENTS.

7 (a) LANDS REMOVED.—The boundary of the Mount

8 Nebo Wilderness is adjusted to exclude the following:

9 (1) PRIVATE PROPERTY IN ANDREWS CAN10 YON.—The approximately 21.26 acres of private
2

•HR 4900 IH

1 property located in Andrews Canyon, Utah, and de2 picted on the Map as ‘‘Dale’’.

3 (2) MONUMENT SPRINGS.—The approximately

4 26.045 acres of land depicted on the Map as ‘‘Monu5 ment Springs’’.

6 (3) GARDNER CANYON.—The approximately

7 202.084 acres of land depicted on the Map as

8 ‘‘Gardner Canyon’’.

9 (4) BIRCH CREEK.—The approximately 26.045

10 acres of land depicted on the Map as ‘‘Birch Creek’’.

11 (5) INGRAM CANYON.—The approximately

12 17.296 acres of land depicted on the Map as

13 ‘‘Ingram Canyon’’.

14 (6) WILLOW CREEK SOUTH.—The approxi15 mately 68.156 acres of land depicted on the Map as

16 ‘‘Willow Creek South’’.

17 (7) WILLOW CREEK NORTH.—The approxi18 mately 50.38 acres of land depicted on the Map as

19 ‘‘Willow Creek North’’.

20 (8) MENDENHALL CANYON.—The approxi21 mately 16.350 acres of land depicted on the Map as

22 ‘‘Mendenhall Canyon’’.

23 (9) WASH CANYON.—The approximately 44.302

24 acres of land depicted on the Map as ‘‘Wash Can25 yon’’.
3

•HR 4900 IH

1 (b) LANDS ADDED.—Subject to valid existing rights,

2 the boundary of the Mount Nebo Wilderness is adjusted

3 to include the approximately 439.209 acres of land de4 picted on the Map for addition to the Mount Nebo Wilder5 ness. The Utah Wilderness Act of 1984 (Public Law 94–

6 428) shall apply to the land added to the Mount Nebo

7 Wilderness pursuant to this subsection.

8 SEC. 3. MAP.

9 (a) DEFINITION.—For the purpose of this Act, the

10 term ‘‘Map’’ shall mean the map entitled ‘‘Mt. Nebo Wil11 derness Boundary Adjustment’’, numbered 1255, and

12 dated July 10, 2000.

13 (b) MAP ON FILE.—The Map shall be on file and

14 available for inspection in the office of the Chief of the

15 Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.

16 (c) CORRECTIONS.—The Secretary of Agriculture

17 may make technical corrections to the Map.

18 SEC. 4. ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE OF ESTABLISHED

19 WATER SYSTEMS.

20 Section 305 of the Utah Wilderness Act of 1984

21 (Public Law 98–428) is amended—

22 (1) by inserting ‘‘or systems’’ before ‘‘, or any

23 combination of the foregoing’’; and
4

•HR 4900 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘established water system oper2 ations,’’ before ‘‘and water reservoir operation pur3 poses.’’.

Æ
§ 62.5 Marking of marine parades and regattas. ( a ) The Coast Guard may establish aids to navigation to mark marine parades and regattas which are regulated by the Coast Guard for the purpose of protecting life and property, or to assist in the observance and enforcement of special regulations. For marine parade and regatta regulations, see Part 100 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1450

HAYWOOD ALLEN CANNON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEWIS H. SWINDELL, IV, Individually and as a

member of the law firm known as Everette and

Hite, LLP; KIMBERLY A. SWANK, Authorized agent

for Everette and Hite, LLP; HYMAN J. BRODY,

Individually and in his official capacity as

authorized agent for the entity known as

Birdneck Point, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-204-7-F)

Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 21, 2004

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haywood Allen Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Lewis H. Swindell, IV,

Appellee Pro Se. Lewis Holmes Swindell, IV, EVERETT, WARREN,

HARPER & SWINDELL, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Haywood A. Cannon appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his civil rights action, denying his motion for

reconsideration, and imposing a prefiling injunction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cannon v.

Swindell, No. CA-03-204-7-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2 & Mar. 9, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Brand *v.*City of Lawrenceville.

Submitted July 16,

Decided November 16, 1906.

Rehearing denied December 21, 1906.

Practice in the Supreme Court.

*F. 0. Foster*and *Peeples é Jordan,*-for plaintiff.

*H. L. Hutchins, Jr.,*for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

Neither under the provisions of-§ 5543 of the Civil Code, nor under any other provision of law in this State, is one who has been a trial judge given any authority to certify, after the judge goes out of' office by resignation or otherwise, a “fast” bill of exceptions. See, in this connection, *Grace*v. *Gordon,*113 *Ga.*88. It follows that where a petition for injunction was heard before a judge of the superior court,, who, after refusing the injunction, resigned his office, and, after his. • .resignation had gone into effect, certified to this court a bill of exceptions assigning error upon his ruling refusing the injunction, this court did not acquire jurisdiction, and the writ of error will he dismissed.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*