alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ADR LUNCHTIME SERIES PRESENTATION

Mindfulness for Conflict Resolvers

Mindfulness is moment-to-moment, non-judgmental awareness, i.e., being fully 

present. We know that the quality of the presence of conflict resolvers has an impact 

on both the parties and the process. We may find ourselves in the middle of highlycharged situations with conflicting parties who are under great stress. Add to that the 

stress of our own fast-paced lives, and the welter of thoughts, emotions, body 

sensations, and habitual modes of reacting that conflict naturally generates, and it may 

be challenging for us to sustain clear, calm, nonjudgmental, focused awareness. This 

interactive presentation will introduce you to the fundamentals of mindfulness 

meditation, which builds our ability to be mindful in our work and our lives, and will 

give you the opportunity to practice a simple technique to enhance the quality of your 

presence. It is designed for beginners as well as for those who already meditate, and 

especially for those who believe their minds are too active to be able to learn to 

meditate.

Speaker: Rachel Wohl, Esq.

 Conflict Specialist

Presented by the Interagency ADR Working Group, Workplace Conflict 

Management Section in coordination with the Department of Energy’s Office of 

Conflict Prevention and Resolution

Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Time: Noon - 1:30 pm EST (Please allow extra time for security procedures)

Location: U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave, SW, Room GE-086

(DOE Forrestal Main Auditorium)

Washington, D.C. 20585

Travel by Metro: Green and Yellow Line - L'Enfant Plaza station (exit to 

Maryland Avenue) OR Orange and Blue Line - Smithsonian station (exit to 

Holocaust Museum/Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

If you plan to attend in person and you need any special accommodations, or if you plan to attend this 

training online and you need any special accommodations, please contact cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov

no later than June, 24, 2016. 

To attend in person, everyone, including federal employees with an HSPD-12 government ID badge, 

must register by email to cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov and provide name, citizenship, and 

agency/employer by July 5, 2016. You do not need to register to call-in or participate online. 

To join the online event and follow the presentation in real time go to: 

https://usdoe.webex.com/usdoe/onstage/g.php?MTID=e380828967cd5a8963a7399d9a8e4fbec

then click "Join Now" and enter Event Password Adr1234 (it’s case sensitive). Then enter your name 

and email address and click “Join Now.” Follow the instructions to join the audio portion. To listen 

only via teleconference, please call 1-650-479-3208 and use access code: 995 605 322. Please disregard 

the prompt for an Attendee ID by pressing # sign. To submit questions to the speaker during the 

program, please use online chat or email victor.voloshin@eeoc.gov. Materials for this presentation will 

be posted at http://www.adr.gov/events.html several days before the program.
§ 156.230 Factors considered in designating lightering zones. The following factors are considered in designating a lightering zone: ( a ) The findings of the environmental analysis or, if prepared, the Environmental Impact Statement;
( b ) The proximity of the zone to: ( 1 ) Shipping lanes;
( 2 ) Vessel traffic schemes or vessel separation systems;
( 3 ) Anchorages;
( 4 ) Fixed structures;
( 5 ) Designated marine sanctuaries;
( 6 ) Commercial and recreational fishing areas;
( 7 ) Environmentally sensitive areas; and
( 8 ) Designated units of the National Park System, National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, National Wilderness Preservation System, properties included on the National Register of Historic Places and National Registry of Natural Landmarks, and National Wildlife Refuge System.
( c ) The traditional use of areas for lightering operations;
( d ) The normal weather and sea conditions in the areas, and their effect on lightering operations, and the fate of possible cargo discharges;
( e ) The depth of water and underwater obstructions that may adversely impact anchorages and clearance of vessels;
( f ) Other relevant safety, environmental, or economic data.
Cinda Foundation Inc

Acct Holder: Cinda Foundation Inc 

Acct Signer(s): Orlando Ferro, Dulce Maria Figueroa

Bank: Popular Community Bank

Acct No: 6917

Acct Type: Business Checking

Opened: 11/29/2016

Stmts Rec'd: 12/29/2017 - 11/30/2021

Bank Account

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-48 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bally Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, RobertC. Caller, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1.               The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date:  November 7,2008

 
| /s/Robert C. Caller                                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Caller                                                |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                                   |

 

----
§ 174.105 Owner or operator casualty reporting requirements. A State casualty reporting system must contain the following requirements of Part 173 applicable to an owner or a person operating a vessel: ( a ) Section 173.55 *Report of casualty or accident.*
( b ) Section 173.57 *Casualty or accident report.*
( c ) Section 173.59 *Where to report.*
(46 U.S.C. 1451, 1467, 1488; 49 CFR 1.46 (n)(1))
[CGD 77-117, 44 FR 42195, July 19, 1979]
Exhibit
3.15







CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT


OF
THE


CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION


OF


ACETO
CORPORATION




Under
Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law




The
undersigned, being the president and the secretary of ACETO CORPORATION, do
hereby certify and set forth:




(1)           The
name of the corporation is ACETO CORPORATION. The name under which the
corporation was formed is ACETO CHEMICAL CO. INC.




(2)           The
date the Certificate of Incorporation was filed by the Department of State
is the 13th day of June, 1947.




(3)           The
Certificate of Incorporation of ACETO CORPORATION, as amended is amended
pursuant to Section 801 of the Business Corporation Law to increase the
aggregate number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, per share, which the
Corporation shall have authority to issue, from 10,000,000 shares to 20,000,000
shares.




(4)           Paragraph
THIRD (A) of the Certificate of Incorporation of ACETO CORPORATION, as amended,
which sets forth the aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have
authority to issue, is hereby amended to read as follows:




“THIRD
(A) The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to
issue is 22,000,000 shares of which 2,000,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock,
issuable in series, of the par value of $2.50 per share and 20,000,000 shares
shall be Common Stock of the par value of $.01 per shares.”




The
foregoing amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation was authorized by vote
of the Board of Directors followed by the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of all outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon at a meeting of the
stockholders of said Corporation duly called and held on the 10th day of
December, 1998, a quorum being present.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate has been subscribed this 15th day of December,
1998, by the undersigned who affirm the statements made herein are true under
the penalties of perjury.


signatureLeonard
      Schwartz, PresidentsignatureDonald
      Horowitz, Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61732-CIV-LENARD/LOUIS

DAVID I. ALTMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

__________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (D.E. 11) AND 

DENYING MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS 

(D.E. 6)

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of 

Magistrate Judge Lauren Louis, (“Report,” D.E. 11), issued December 2, 2022, 

recommending that the Court deny Petitioner David I. Altman’s Motion for Permission to 

Appeal in Forma Pauperis, (“Motion,” D.E. 6), filed October 13, 2022. Specifically, Judge 

Louis found that Petitioner’s appeal is not taken in good faith. (Report at 6.) The Report 

provides the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file objections. As of the date of this Order, 

no objections have been filed. Failure to file objections shall bar parties from attacking on 

appeal the factual findings contained in the report. See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hallmark 

Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Therefore, after an independent 

review of the Report and record, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (D.E. 11) issued 

on December 2, 2022, is ADOPTED; and

Case 0:22-cv-61732-JAL Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Petitioner’s Motion for Permission to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (D.E. 6) is 

DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 22nd day of 

December, 2022.

____________________________________

JOAN A. LENARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 0:22-cv-61732-JAL Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 207.170a Eugene J. Burrell Navigation Lock in Haines Creek near Lisbon, Fla.; use, administration, and navigation. ( a ) The owner of or agency controlling the lock shall not be required to operate the navigation lock except from 7 a.m. to 12 noon, and from 1 p.m. to 7 p.m., during the period of February 15 through October 15 each year; and from 8 a.m. to 12 noon, and from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m., during the remaining months of each year. During the above hours and periods the lock shall be opened upon demand for the passage of vessels.
( b ) The owner of the lock shall place signs, of such size and description as may be designated by the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville, Florida, at each side of this lock indicating the nature of the regulations of this section.
[24 FR 1461, Feb. 27, 1959]
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: F AA- 2011 - 0475 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM199AD

757 - 27A0152, R2 --- 5/25/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
#### § 183.610 Powered ventilation system.

(a) Each compartment in a boat that has a permanently installed gasoline engine with a cranking motor must:

(1) Be open to the atmosphere, or

(2) Be ventilated by an exhaust blower system.

(b) Each exhaust blower or combination of blowers must be rated at an air flow capacity not less than that computed by the formulas given in Table [183.610](/on/2024-09-19/title-33/section-183.610), Column 2. Blower rating must be determined according to AMCA Standard 210-74, Figure 12, or UL Standard 1128.

Table [183.610](/on/2024-09-19/title-33/section-183.610)

| Col. 11 | Col. 22 | Col. 33 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Below 34 | Fr = 50 | Fo = 20 |
| 34 to 100 | Fr = 1.5V | Fo = 0.6V |
| Over 100 | Fr = V/2 + 100 | Fo = 0.2V + 40 |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Net compartment volume of engine compartment and compartments open thereto (V) cubic feet. | | |
| 2 Rated blower capacity (Fr) cubic feet per minute. | | |
| 3 Blower system output (Fo) cubic feet per minute. | | |

(c) Each exhaust blower system required by [paragraph (a)(2)](/on/2024-09-19/title-33/section-183.610#p-183.610(a)(2)) of this section must exhaust air from the boat at a rate which meets the requirements of Table [183.610](/on/2024-09-19/title-33/section-183.610), Column 3 when the engine is not operating.

(d) Each intake duct for an exhaust blower must be in the lower one-third of the compartment and above the normal level of accumulated bilge water.

(e) More than one exhaust blower may be used in combination to meet the requirements of this section.

(f) Each boat that is required to have an exhaust blower must have a label that:

(1) Is located as close as practicable to each ignition switch;

(2) Is in plain view of the operator; and

(3) Has at least the following information:

WARNING—GASOLINE VAPORS CAN EXPLODE. BEFORE STARTING ENGINE OPERATE BLOWER FOR 4 MINUTES AND CHECK ENGINE COMPARTMENT BILGE FOR GASOLINE VAPORS.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed a part of the Report or
"filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


By          /s/ PAUL G. DRISCOLL
         ------------------------------
                Paul G. Driscoll
               Vice President and
             Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  May 15, 2007




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and will
be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4965 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4965

 To amend the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, to extend 
the time period during which persons may file a complaint alleging the 
 preparation of false inspection certificates at Hunts Point Terminal 
                        Market, Bronx, New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2000

Mr. Condit (for himself, and Mr. Pombo) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930, to extend 
the time period during which persons may file a complaint alleging the 
 preparation of false inspection certificates at Hunts Point Terminal 
                        Market, Bronx, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME PERIOD FOR FILING CERTAIN COMPLAINTS UNDER 
              PERISHABLE AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1930.

    Section 6(a)(1) of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 
1930 (7 U.S.C. 499f(a)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a person that 
desires to file a complaint under this section involving the allegation 
of false inspection certificates prepared by graders of the Department 
of Agriculture at Hunts Point Terminal Market, Bronx, New York, prior 
to October 27, 1999, may file the complaint until January 1, 2001.''.
                                 <all>
```
528 P.2d 206

#### Doris PERRIGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 11510.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Nov. 12, 1974.

Hamilton & Hamilton, Coeur d’Alene, for plaintiff-appellant.

Samuel Eismann, Coeur d’Alene, for defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This case arises out of the interpretation of an accidental death provision of a life insurance contract. After a quarrel, Doris Perrigo shot and killed her husband under circumstances in which she claimed that the death was accidental. She was tried for first degree murder and was acquitted. She then filed a claim against John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company as the beneficiary under an insurance policy on her late husband’s life. John Hancock rejected the part of her claim in which she asked for benefits under a clause granting additional payment if the insured died an accidental death. John Hancock moved for summary judgment which was granted in its favor, and Mrs. Perrigo appealed. We reverse the trial court’s entry of summary judgment against her.

Summary judgment is improperly granted when the supporting depositions or affidavits show there is a dispute as to a material fact. I.R.C.P. 56(c); Langroise v. Becker, 96 Idaho 218, 526 P.2d 178 (1974). A review of the following cases shows how, under similar circumstances, different courts have come to different conclusions on the question of whether or not deaths caused by family members were “accidental” within the meaning of insurance policies. Gem State Mutual Life Assoc. v. Gray, 77 Idaho 157, 290 P.2d 217 (1955); Rodolph v. New York Life Insurance Co., 412 P.2d 610 (Wyo.1966); Life & Casualty Co. of Tennessee v. Hulsey, 109 Ga.App. 15, 134 S.E.2d 880 (1964); General American Life Insurance Co. v. Priest, 301 F.2d 390 (10th Cir. 1962); Shields v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 6 N.J. 517, 79 A.2d 297 (1951). In this case the primary evidence before the trial court on the summary judgment hearing was the testimony of Mrs. Perrigo and a houseguest given at the criminal trial of Mrs. Perrigo. On the record before us we cannot say as a matter of law that there is no question of fact over the issue of whether or not the death of her husband was “accidental” within the meaning of the policy. Thus, summary judgment was improperly granted against Mrs. Perrigo, and the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the matter remanded for trial.

Costs to appellant.
{"id":26559,"date":"2021-04-08T19:29:21","date_gmt":"2021-04-08T23:29:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/adr.gov\/?page_id=26559"},"modified":"2022-02-04T10:31:34","modified_gmt":"2022-02-04T15:31:34","slug":"contact","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/adr.gov\/contact\/","title":{"rendered":"Contact"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 hundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling\" style=\"background-color: rgba(255,255,255,0);background-position: center center;background-repeat: no-repeat;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;margin-bottom: 0px;margin-top: 0px;border-width: 0px 0px 0px 0px;border-color:#eae9e9;border-style:solid;\" ><div class=\"fusion-builder-row fusion-row\"><div class=\"fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-one-full fusion-column-first fusion-column-last fusion-column-no-min-height\" style=\"margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;\"><div class=\"fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy\" style=\"background-position:left top;background-repeat:no-repeat;-webkit-background-size:cover;-moz-background-size:cover;-o-background-size:cover;background-size:cover;padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;\"><style type=\"text\/css\"><\/style><div class=\"fusion-title title fusion-title-1 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-two\" style=\"margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:31px;margin-left:0px;\"><h2 class=\"title-heading-left\" style=\"margin:0;\">Contact Us<\/h2><span class=\"awb-title-spacer\"><\/span><div class=\"title-sep-container\"><div class=\"title-sep sep-double sep-solid\" style=\"border-color:#e0dede;\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><div class=\"fusion-text fusion-text-1\"><div class=\"gradientBox\">\n<div><strong>By Mail:<\/strong><\/div>\n<p>Office of Conflict Management and Prevention<br \/>\nFederal Mediation and Conciliation Service<br \/>\n250 E. St. SW 7th Floor<br \/>\nWashington, DC 20427<\/p>\n<div><strong>By Email:<\/strong><\/div>\n<p><a href=\"mailto:ADR@fmcs.gov\">ADR@fmcs.gov<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><div class=\"fusion-clearfix\"><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><style type=\"text\/css\">.fusion-fullwidth.fusion-builder-row-1 { overflow:visible; }<\/style><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/adr.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/26559"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/adr.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/adr.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adr.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adr.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26559"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/adr.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/26559\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/adr.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}