T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DO NG YU , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 72380 A ge nc yN o. A 099- 370- 295 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r9, 2012 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , M U R G U IA , an dW A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D ong Y u, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , and pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . O ur 

# FI LED OC T 12 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 72380 2 j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence th e ag en cy’ s factu al fi n d i n g s, ap p l yi n g th e n ew st an d ard s g o v ern i n g ad v erse c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n s c r e a te db yth e R e a l I D A c t. Sh restha v. H older , 590 F . 3d 1034, 1039 ( 9th C i r . 2010) . W e de nyi n parta nd di s m i s s i n partthe pe t i t i on f o rr e v ie w . E v e n i f c r e d i b l e , s ub s t an t i a l e v i d e n c e s up p o rt s th e B I A’ s c o n c l u s i o n th a tYu f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h the harm he s uf f e r e d orw i l l s uf

f e ri f he r e turns t o C hi naw a s or w o u ldb e o n a c c o u n t o f h is p o litic a l o p in io n . Se e Ko z u l i n v . I NS , 218 F . 3d 1112, 1115- 17 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( e vi de nc e di d notc om pe l c onc l us i on tha tbe a t i ng of R us s i a n ant i - c om m uni s t , s hort l ya f t e rhe r e port e d m i s c onduc tof hi s s hi p c apt a i n, w a s o n a c c o u n t o f

p o litic a l o p in io n ) . A c c o r d in g ly , in th e ab s e n c e o f an e x u s , h is a s y lu m an dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. See O ch o a v. G o n za les, 406 F . 3d 1 1 6 6 , 1 1 7 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e a l s o s upport s the B I A ’ s c onc l us i on tha tY u ha s not e s tab lis h e dit is m o r e lik e lyth an n o t h e w ill b e to rtu r e dup o n r e tu rn to C h in a . See W akkaryv. H

older , 5 5 8 F . 3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 6 8 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 9 ) . Ac c o r d i n g l y , h i s C AT c la im f a ils . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o con si der Y u’ s due proces s c hal l enge, hi s c l ai m base d on C hr i s t i ani ty , a nd hi s c l a i m ba s e d on i nvol unt arys t e r i l i z at i on be c aus e he di d not10- 72380 3 e x h au s t th e s e c la im s b e f o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 677- 7 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t .