CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Sacramento Metropolit an Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 464 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended September 25, 2008

Rule Title(s): Organic Chemical Manufacturing Operations

Date Submitted to ARB: May 18, 2009

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Adopted July 23, 1998

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Kevin J. Williams Phone Number: (916) 874-4851 E-mail Address: kjwilliams@airquality.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The proposed amendments will reduce the VOC limit for ma intenance cleaning solvent from 50 g/l to 25 g/l in

Section 308.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Ca tegory: The 1994 SIP included a commitment to reduce VOC

emissions from surface preparation and cleanup solvents by 2.9 tpd from the Sacramento district. Surface

preparation and cleanup solvents are included in multiple rules. Prior to amendment of this rule, the district had

reduced emissions from this category by 2.5 tpd. Although this amendment to Rule 464 produced no emission

reductions, the 2008 amendments to eight other prohibitory rules with surface preparation and cleanup requirements

brought the total emission reduction from this categor y to 3 tpd, which satisfies the SIP commitment.

Inventory Year Used to Calcul ate Changes in Emissions: 2010 Area Affected: Sacramento County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control M easure: 5.6 tpd for t he Sacramento district.

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Cont rol Measure: 2.9 tpd fo r the Sacramento district.

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 2

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 1 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company , Sacramento, CA (Sacramento County)

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 301-308 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission R eductions are: installing emission control equipment.

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 301-308 Work Practice St andards in Section(s): 308

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 501 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: This rule amendment has no impact on emissions. The three facilities that are subject to Rule 464 already

comply with the new requirements.