alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,939
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (98)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,819
<PP&E>                                          58,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,323)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,341
<BONDS>                                          4,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              422
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,831
<SALES>                                        416,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               416,636
<CGS>                                          412,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  415,045
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,634
<INCOME-TAX>                                       594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,040
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
AMENDMENT TO


EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 


This Amendment to Executive Employment
Agreement (“Amendment”) amends the Executive Employment Agreement between Geovic Mining Corp. and Timothy D. Arnold
(“Executive”) effective as of 16 February, 2009 (“Agreement”), and is effective 31 March, 2012.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the parties acknowledge the
Agreement may be amended by mutual written agreement of the parties thereto;


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual promises and undertakings contained herein, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, the parties
to this Amendment, intending to be legally bound, agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


AMENDMENT


A new Section 16 is hereby added
to the Agreement and reads as follows:


16.Section 409A.


Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, if Executive is a ‘specified employee’ within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the ‘Code’) and would receive any payment sooner than six (6) months
after Executive’s ‘separation from service’ (as such term is defined for purposes of Section 409A of the Code)
that, absent the application of this Section 16, would be subject to additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A of the Code
as a result of such status as a specified employee, then such payment shall instead be payable on the date that is the earliest
of (i) the first business day following six (6) months after Executive’s separation from service, (ii) Executive’s
death, or (iii) such other date that would not subject such payment to additional tax imposed pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.
All payments deferred pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be paid in a lump sum to Executive (or Executive’s estate
or beneficiaries), and any remaining payments due to Executive under this Agreement shall be paid as otherwise provided herein.


 


This Amendment may be executed in counterparts
and may be delivered by facsimile, e-mail, or other electronic means, all of which shall be deemed to be originals, and which
shall be deemed to constitute one document. 





	Geovic Mining Corp.	 	Executive 
	 	 	 
	/s/  Michael T. Mason	 	 /s/ Timothy D. Arnold
	By:  Michael T. Mason	 	 
	Title: CEO, Chairman	 	Date: March 31, 2012
	Date: March 31, 2012
Ferro's Entertainment and Production LLC

Period

EIDL 

Application Bank Records Difference

1/1/2019 - 1/31/2020 $167,290.00 $0.00 -$167,290.00

Reported vs Potential Gross Receipts (1/1/2019 - 1/31/2020)

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-43 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 

32.1 

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Lefevre, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: November 20, 2006   | By:/s/George Lefevre                       |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | George Lefevre CEO                                                                                                                                       |
```

[106th Congress Public Law 552]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ552.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 2761]]

Public Law 106-552
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To redesignate the facility of the <<NOTE: Dec. 20, 2000 -  [H.R. 
5016]>> United States Postal Service located at 514 Express Center Road 
      in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``J.T. Weeker Service Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 514 
Express Center Road in Chicago, Illinois, and known as the Chicago 
International/Military Service Center, shall be known and designated as 
the ``J.T. Weeker Service Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J.T. Weeker Service Center''.

    Approved December 20, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5016:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Oct. 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### CHARLES H. SMITH, Respondent, *v.*GEORGE S. WRIGHT, Appellant, and others.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of .plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.

This action was brought to recover a balance due upon a written contract to do joiner and other work on the steamship Vixen. By the terms of the contract and specifications, all the materials and workmanship were subject to the approval of the defendant Lewis. The payments were to be made on the order of Lewis. The plaintiff neither gave evidence of an order from the defendant Lewis, nor John T. Wright, Jr., the agent of the defendants, the owners, and who made the contract as such, nor of an application for it, as required by the contract to enable him to demand payment. *Held,*that it was necessary to show, in the absence of the order, that it was obstinately and unreasonably or fraudulently refused on *653application. Performance of the contract when the order is refused will excuse its non-production, because that proof will demonstrate the unreasonable conduct of the person in refusing to give it, but it will not obviate the necessity of applying for it. *(Smith v. Brady,*17 N. Y., 176; *U. S.*v. *Robeson,*9 Peters, 319 ; *McMahon*v. *N. Y. and E. R. Co.,*20 N. Y., 466 ; *Thomas*v. *Fleury,*26 id., 26 ; see, also, *Hurst*v. *Litchfield,*39 id., 380; *Wyckoff*v. *Meyers,*44 id., 143; *Glacius*v. *Black,*50 id., 145.)

*Albert Smith,*for the respondent.

*John N. Whiting*and *Foster & Thomson,*for the appellant.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.
#### JOHN S. LYON, Appellant, *v.*LOREN WILCOX and another, Administrators, etc., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the report of a referee.

In this action, brought to recover the value of work, labor and services, performed for the defendant’s intestate, the referee found that the plaintiff had been paid in full therefor. The General Term *held,*that this finding was not sustained by the evidence, and reversed the judgment.

*J. W.*Dininny, for the appellant.

*George B. Bradley,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Smith, J.

Present—Mullin, P. J., Smith and Morgan, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the* event.
•

•

AOOEMUM 1

JULy 25, 1988

'!he current Mer!Dramum of Ag'reenElt between the state of wash.in:Jton am the

unite:! states Envirorunental Protection }qercy Region X, date:! June 1986, is

SUWlemented by this hXlen:ium 1. All terms defined in the existin3'

MeItDranium of Ag'reenElt shall have the same neani..n:3s for purposes of this

hXlen:ium 1.

Availability of Infonnation to the Public

F.colO3}' agrees, subject to restrictions i1TJfO'5E'd by exist~ state law, to

make the fullest possible disclosure of records to the p..1blic in a manner

equivalent to 40 CFR Part 2. 'This shall include all infonnation available

in F.colO3}"s records am files, subject to claims of confidentiality am

specific statutory exerrptions. state law specifies prcx::edures for prov.id.inq

information to the publIc, am these prcx::edures closely parallel 40 CFR Part

2. 'lbe prcx::edures generally specify a fonnal request med1anism, but do allow

that the p..1blic will be able to obtain certain material on a routine basis,

withoot a fonnal request. 'Ihese materials include state regulations,

administrative staff manuals affect~ the publi.c, statenents of

departmental policy, am final opinions or orders in case adjudications. In

some respects, state law is not as specific as 40 CFR part 2, so F.colO3}'

agrees, in particular, to iJrpleIrent the followi.n} prcx::edures:

1. EcolO3}' agrees that, if a p..1blic disclosure request results in a

need to resolve a claim of business confidentiality, am the claim

cannot be resolved within the twenty day response time, then

EcolO3}' will notify the requestor that the infonnation is not

available because of failure to resolve the business

confidentiality claim.

2. EcolO3}' agrees that notices of denial of public disclosure shall

include discussion of applicable judicial appeal procedures.

state law does not establish a statute of limitations on appeals,

so notices of denial will not discuss statutes of limitations.

EcolO3}' agrees to maintain a log or file of such denials of

requests for infonnation.

3. EcolO3}' agrees that, in situations where fees for public records

might nonnally be assessed, if EcolO3}' detennines that the
•

MemoraJ'XhDn of Agreement

July 25, 1988

Page 2

infcxmatim would be of primary benefit to the general plblic,

then the fees may be waived or reduced. Requests fran the press

ani plblic interest 9roJPS may also be subject to waiver or

reducticm of fees.

STATEOF~

IEPARl14ENl' OF EmI.eX;Y

u. s. ENVIRCHo1ENrAL ~OO'

AGENCY, mx:;IOO X

By: (}[ .. /0 . vudiu< )t)ibyutz. . I

•

.-.

Director, of Ecology

rate: _-=':~~"'- _

Title: Acting Regional Administrator
Rosanne DiStefano

Executive Director

Elder Services of the Merrimack Valley

June 19, 2013
 

 Challenges and Risks

 Incentives

 Goal Alignment 

 ROI 

 Program Costs

 Pilots
 Timing

 Multiple Initiatives

 Outcome and proof of value

 Pilot to contract negotiations 

 ACO’s and corporate buy in
 Labor hours into costs

 Aligning goals

 Infrastructure

 Customer as elder and payer

 Strong clinical oversight
 Interdisciplinary Perspective 

 Pilots - be flexible

 Vision

 Flexibility

 Board Support

 Innovation and Excitement
Population Health Outcomes/Functional Outcomes
Rosanne DiStefano, Executive Director

Elder Services of the Merrimack Valley,

rdistefano@esmv.org (978) 946 1399

Joan Hatem-Roy, LICSW, Assistant Executive Director

Elder Services of the Merrimack Valley, Inc. 

jhatemroy@esmv.org (978) 946 1361

Jennifer Raymond, MBA, Director of Evidence-based 

Programs

Hebrew Senior Life 

JenniferRaymond@hsl.harvard.edu (617) 363-8319
135 San Lorenzo Avenue, Suite 770, Coral Gables, Florida 33146

TEL 305.230.4884 FAX 305.230.4844

www.fairlawattorney.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-23074-BLOOM/OTAZO-REYES

OCTAVIO COLLADO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

450 NORTH RIVER DRIVE, LLC,

D/B/A KIKI ON THE RIVER, 

RJ RIVER, LLC AND 

ROMAN JONES,

Defendants.

______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF FILING CONSENT TO JOIN 

(Brenna Wagnon) 

 

Plaintiff, Octavio Collado, notices the Court and all parties of the filing of the Consent to 

Join in these proceedings by Brenna Wagnon.

Dated this 20th day of March 2023. 

s/Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Brian H. Pollock, Esq.

Fla. Bar No. 174742

brian@fairlawattorney.com

FAIRLAW FIRM

135 San Lorenzo Avenue

Suite 770

Coral Gables, FL 33146

Tel: 305.230.4884

Counsel for Plaintiff(s)

Case 1:22-cv-23074-BB Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/20/2023 Page 1 of 1
Argued and submitted April 13,

affirmed October 21, 1992

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Hubert W. Barker, Claimant. Hubert W. BARKER, *Petitioner, v.*FARMERS PACKING CO. and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(87-00261; CA A71219)

839 P2d 765

Edward J. Harri, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Malagon, Moore & Johnson, Eugene.

Julie K. Bolt, Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.

*716DURHAM, J.

*717DURHAM, J.

Claimant was injured in 1974 and has not worked since. In a 1990 order, the Board found that claimant had not established a willingness to work, that he was able to do gainful, light work and that he had refused a job offer. It also found that he suffered a 65 percent unscheduled permanent total disability (PTD) and had a functional overlay but was not entitled to PTD benefits, because he could work. Claimant sought review. We remanded for reconsideration, because substantial evidence did not support the Board’s finding that claimant had a functional overlay and we could not tell whether that finding had influenced its decision. *Barker v. Farmers Packing Co.,*107 Or App 376, 812 P2d 22 (1991). On remand, the Board said that claimant did not have functional overlay, stated that the functional overlay finding had not affected its decision and adhered to its former order.1

Claimant seeks review of the order on remand, asserting that the Board failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its conclusion. We disagree. Although the Board did not explain why it adhered to its earlier conclusion even without proof of functional overlay, the original order and the order on remand, when read together, provide a reasoned explanation for the denial of PTD. Claimant had to prove that he is unable regularly to perform work at a gainful and suitable occupation. ORS 656.206(1)(a); *Wilson v. Weyerhaeuser,*30 Or App 403, 409, 567 P2d 567 (1977). The Board found that claimant turned down gainful employment and that he could work. Claimant’s doctors felt that he could perform the offered work. Substantial evidence supported the Board’s decision. *Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.,*90 Or App 200, 206, 752 P2d 312 (1988).

Affirmed.

1

 The Board’s order says:

> “After completing our reconsideration, subject to the following exception, we continue to adhere to our prior findings and conclusions that claimant is not entitled to permanent total disability benefits: In conducting this reconsideration, we expressly do not adhere to our prior erroneous finding that claimant has a ‘documented history of functional overlay.’ Furthermore, we wish to emphasize that our prior erroneous finding that claimant has a ‘documented history of functional overlay’ has not influenced our decision. Accordingly, as supplemented and clarified herein, we adhere to and republish our April 27, 1990 order.”
68834180;1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

Civil Case No.: 1:22-cv-22972-RNS/GOODMAN 

CURTIS J. JACKSON, III p/k/a 50 CENT, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ANGELA KOGAN, PERFECTION PLASTIC 

SURGERY, INC. d/b/a PERFECTION PLASTIC 

SURGERY & MEDSPA, and THE SHADE 

ROOM, LLC d/b/a THE SHADE ROOM, 

Defendants. 

________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT BETWEEN JACKSON AND THE SHADE ROOM, LLC 

Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, Plaintiff Curtis J. Jackson, III p/k/a 50 Cent (“Jackson”), by 

and through his undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice that he has reached an agreement to settle 

with Defendant The Shade Room, LLC d/b/a The Shade Room (“TSR”) in the above-captioned 

action. Jackson and TSR are in the process of executing their respective obligations pursuant to 

the agreement and will file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant The 

Shade Room, LLC shortly thereafter.1

This notice does not apply to Defendants Angela Kogan and Perfection Plastic Surgery, 

Inc. d/b/a Perfection Plastic Surgery & MedSpa. 

1

 Jackson filed his First Amended Complaint on Monday, January 16, 2023 and added TSR as an additional defendant. 

TSR has not made an appearance in this action, and its response to the First Amended Complaint is currently due on 

or before March 13, 2023. 

Case 1:22-cv-22972-RNS Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 1 of 2
68834180;1 

Dated: February 21, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

AKERMAN LLP 

 /s/ Eamon O’ Kelly

Joseph Rebak 

Florida Bar No. 308668 

Alejandro J. Paz 

Florida Bar No. 1011728 

Three Brickell City Centre 

98 Southeast Seventh Street, Suite 1100 

Miami, Florida 33131 

Tel.: (305) 374-5600 

Fax: (305) 374-5095 

joseph.rebak@akerman.com 

alejandro.paz@akerman.com 

Craig Weiner (pro hac vice) 

Eamon O'Kelly (pro hac vice) 

Reena Jain (pro hac vice) 

1251 Avenue of the Americas, 37th Floor 

New York, New York 10020 

Tel.: (212) 880-3800 

Fax: (212) 880-8965 

craig.weiner@akerman.com 

eamon.okelly@akerman.com 

reena.jain@akerman.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Curtis Jackson, III 

p/k/a 50 Cent

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 21st day of February 2023, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing notice was served via the Court’s CM/ECF System upon all counsel of record. The 

forgoing notice was also sent to TSR’s counsel via email. 

/s/ Alejandro J. Paz

Alejandro J. Paz 

Case 1:22-cv-22972-RNS Document 45 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2023 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23          
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  No.  333-105237 of TMSF  Holdings,  Inc. on Form SB-2/A of ourreport,  dated  March 29, 2005,  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of TMSF  Holdings,  Inc. for the year ended December31, 2004.
We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in such prospectus.
SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM& GOLDSTEIN LLP Los Angeles, CaliforniaMarch 31, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA No. 00-1143; MM Docket No. 99-133; RM-9523] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule, denial. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document denies a petition for rule making filed by Mountain West Broadcasting requesting the allotment of Channel 230A at Evergreen, Montana.                         *See*64 FR 24996, May 10, 1999. Based on the information submitted by Mountain West Broadcasting, we believe it has failed to establish that Evergreen qualifies as a community for allotment purposes and therefore it would not serve the public interest to allot a channel to Evergreen. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order, MM Docket No. 99-133, adopted May 17, 2000, and released May 26, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805. 

John A. Karousos, 

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 00-14541 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-U