36468 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 111 / Thursday, June 8, 2000 / Notices

proposed is a one-time effort

incorporating three main components: A

terrorist threat and risk assessment, a

public health capabilities assessment,

and an equipment needs and

capabilities assessment. Information

will be collected by approximately

9,000 local law enforcement, public

health, and emergency management

agencies. In addition, a state

administrative agency in each state will

roll-up the local data and submit this

information to OJP/OSLDPS. Collection

and tabulation of the raw data at the

local level may take up to one month.

Jurisdictions using the OJP data

collection tool designed for this exercise

may experience burdens ranging from

4–8 hours to collect tabulate and input

data. In addition, roll-up of the data at

the state level and electronic submission

to OJP may take up to 4 hours.

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection: The total public burden

associated with this one-time data

collection will be approximately 66,200

hours.

If additional information is required,

contact: Ms. Brenda E. Dyer, Deputy

Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice, Information

Management and Security Staff, Justice

Management Division, Suite 1220,

National Place Building, 1331

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,

DC 20530.

Dated: June 2, 2000.

Brenda E. Dyer,

Department Deputy Clearance Officer, United

States Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 00–14421 Filed 6–7–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Justice

[OJP(NIJ)–1279]

National Institute of Justice

Announcement of the Tenth Meeting of

the National Commission on the Future

of DNA Evidence

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs,

National Institute of Justice, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: Announcement of the tenth

meeting of the National Commission on

the Future of DNA Evidence.

DATES: The tenth meeting of the

National Commission on the Future of

DNA Evidence will take place on

Sunday, July 9, 2000 from 1 p.m. to 5

p.m.,EST, and on Monday, July 10, 2000

from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., EST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place

at the Grand Hyatt Hotel, 1000 H Street,

N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Phone:

(202) 584–1234.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher H. Asplen, AUSA,

Executive Director. Phone: (202) 616–

8123. [This is not a toll-free number].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority

This action is authorized under the

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets

Act of 1968, Sections 201–03, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. 3721–23 (1994).

Background

The National Commission on the

Future of DNA Evidence, established

pursuant to Section 3(2)A of the Federal

Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5

U.S.C. App. 2, will meet to carry out its

advisory functions under Sections 201–

202 of the Omnibus Crime Control and

Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended.

This meeting will be open to the public.

The purpose of the National

Commission on the Future of DNA

Evidence is to provide the Attorney

General with recommendations on the

use of current and future DNA methods,

applications and technologies in the

operation of the criminal justice system,

from the crime scene to the courtroom.

Over the course of its Charter, the

Commission will review critical policy

issues regarding DNA evidence and

provide recommended courses of action

to improve its use as a tool of

investigation and adjudication in

criminal cases.

The Commission will address issues

in five specific areas: (1) The use of

DNA in postconviction relief cases, (2)

legal concerns including Daubert

challenges and the scope of discovery in

DNA cases, (3) criteria for training and

technical assistance for criminal justice

professionals involved in the

identification, collection and

preservation of DNA evidence at the

crime scene, (4) essential laboratory

capabilities in the face of emerging

technologies, and (5) the impact of

future technological developments in

the use of DNA in the criminal justice

system. Each topic will be the focus of

the in-depth analysis by separate

working groups comprised of prominent

professionals who will report back to

the Commission.

Dated: June 2, 2000.

Doug Horner,

Acting Director, National Institute of Justice.

[FR Doc. 00–14442 Filed 6–7–00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–37,011]

Cooper Energy Services, Grove City,

Pennsylvania; Notice of Revised

Determination on Reconsideration

On April 27, 200, the Department

issued an Affirmative Determination

Regarding Application for

Reconsideration for the workers and

former worker of the subject firm. The

notice was published in the Federal

Register on May 4, 2000 (65 FR 25947).

Investigation findings show that the

workers are primarily engaged in the

production of castings and machined

components. The worker were denied

TAA because the ‘‘contributed

importantly’’ test of the Group

Eligibility Requirements of the Trade

Act was not met. The workers were

denied NAFTA–TAA on the basis that

there was no shift in production to

Mexico or Canada, nor were there

company or customer imports of

castings or machined components from

Mexico or Canada.

The petitioners presented evidence

that some of the production of pistons

was shifted to Canada and is being

returned to the United States.

New information obtained from the

subject firm on reconsideration reveal

that for a short period of time during

which the machining centers were being

transferred from Grove City,

Pennsylvania, to another domestic

location, the company source machined

components from a Canadian firm.

Other findings on reconsideration show

that the company is increasing its

reliance on castings from Mexico.

Conclusion

After careful consideration of the new

facts obtained on reconsideration, it is

concluded that the workers of Cooper

Energy Services, Grove City,

Pennsylvania, were adversely affected

by increased imports, including those

from Canada and Mexico, of articles like

or directly competitive with castings

and machined components produced at

the subject firm.

‘‘All workers of Cooper Energy Services,

Grove City, Pennsylvania, who became

totally or partially separated from

employment on or after October 13, 1998,

through two years from the date of this

issuance, are eligible to apply for adjustment

assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act

of 1974;’’ and

‘‘All workers of Cooper Energy Services,

Grove City, Pennsylvania, who became

totally or partially separated from

employment on or after October 13, 1998,