alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 157
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 157 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

§ 157.216 Required documents: Foreign tank vessels. ( a ) The owner, operator, and master of a foreign tank vessel meeting § 157.10a(b), § 157.10a(c)(2), § 157.10b(a)(2), or § 157.10c(c)(2) shall ensure that the vessel does not enter the navigable waters of the United States or transfer cargo at a port or place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States unless the vessel has on board— ( 1 ) The *Dedicated Clean Ballast Tank Operations Manual* that— ( i ) Is approved under § 157.210; or
( ii ) Is certified by the government of the vessel's flag state because it meets the manual standards in Resolution 14 of the MARPOL 73/78; and
( 2 ) Either of the following: ( i ) A letter from the government of the vessel's flag state that certifies that the vessel complies with Resolution 14 of the MARPOL 73/78.
( ii ) The letter of acceptance under § 157.204 and each amending letter issued under § 157.218(c).
( b ) On January 1, 1986, or 15 years after the date it was delivered to the original owner or 15 years after the completion of a major conversion, whichever is later, the owner, operator, and master of a foreign tank vessel under § 157.10c(c)(2) shall ensure that the vessel does not enter the navigable waters of the United States or transfer cargo at a port or place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States unless the vessel has on board— ( 1 ) The *Dedicated Clean Ballast Tank Operations Manual* that— ( i ) Is approved under § 157.210; or
( ii ) Bears a certification by an authorized CS or the government of the vessel's flag state that the manual meets § 157.224; and
( 2 ) Either of the following: ( i ) A letter from an authorized CS or the government of the vessel's flag state certifying the vessel complies with §§ 157.220 and 157.222, and any amending letters issued approviding alterations.
( ii ) The letter of acceptance under § 157.204 and each amending letter issued under § 157.218.
(Reporting and Recordkeeping requirements approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1625-0036) [CGD 82-28, 50 FR 11629, 11630, Mar. 22, 1985; USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55573, Nov. 2, 2001; USCG-2006-25150, 71 FR 39211, July 12, 2006]
§ 327.3 Definitions. ( a ) *Public hearing* means a public proceeding conducted for the purpose of acquiring information or evidence which will be considered in evaluating a proposed DA permit action, or Federal project, and which affords the public an opportunity to present their views, opinions, and information on such permit actions or Federal projects.
( b ) *Permit action,* as used herein means the evaluation of and decision on an application for a DA permit pursuant to sections 9 or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or section 103 of the MPRSA, as amended, or the modification, suspension or revocation of any DA permit (see 33 CFR 325.7).
( c ) *Federal project* means a Corps of Engineers project (work or activity of any nature for any purpose which is to be performed by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Congressional authorizations) involving the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States or the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of dumping it in ocean waters subject to section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or section 103 of the MPRSA.
§ 334.120 Delaware Bay off Milford Neck; naval aircraft bombing target area. ( a ) *The danger zone.* A circular area of one nautical mile radius having its center in Delaware Bay at latitude 38°58′12′′, longitude 75°17′30′′.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) Anchoring, trawling, crabbing, fishing and dragging in the danger zone are prohibited during daylight hours.
( 2 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commandant, Fourth Naval District, and such agencies as he may designate.
[20 FR 563, Jan. 26, 1955. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed a part of the Report or
"filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


By          /s/ PAUL G. DRISCOLL
         ------------------------------
                Paul G. Driscoll
               Vice President and
             Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  August 3, 2006




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and will
be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.899 Youngs Bay and Lewis and Clark River. ( a ) The draw of the US101 (New Youngs Bay) highway bridge, mile 0.7, across Youngs Bay at Smith Point, shall open on signal for the passage of vessels if at least one half-hour notice is given to the draw tender at the Lewis and Clark River Bridge by marine radio, telephone, or other suitable means from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. During all other times, including weekends from 5 p.m. on Friday until 7 a.m. on Monday, and all Federal holidays except Columbus Day, the draw shall open on signal if at least a two-hour notice is given to the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) by telephone. The opening signal shall be two prolonged blasts followed by one short blast.
( b ) The draw of the Oregon State (Old Youngs Bay) highway bridge, mile 2.4, across Youngs Bay foot of Fifth Street, shall open on signal for the passage of vessels if at least one half-hour notice is given to the draw tender at the Lewis and Clark River Bridge by marine radio, telephone, or other suitable means from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. During all other times, including weekends from 5 p.m. on Friday until 7 a.m. on Monday, and all Federal holidays except Columbus Day, the draw shall open on signal if at least a two-hour notice is given to ODOT by telephone. The opening signal shall be two prolonged blasts followed by one short blast.
( c ) The draw of the Oregon State (Lewis and Clark River) highway bridge, mile 1.0, across the Lewis and Clark River, shall open on signal for the passage of vessels if at least one half-hour notice is given by marine radio, telephone, or other suitable means from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. During all other times, including weekends from 5 p.m. on Friday until 7 a.m. on Monday, and all Federal holidays except Columbus Day, the draw shall open on signal if at least a two-hour notice is given to ODOT by telephone. The opening signal shall be two prolonged blasts followed by four short blast.
[USCG-2018-0131, 84 FR 18142, Apr. 30, 2019]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-61383-CIV-ALTMAN

MARCELA TORRES CASTRO, 

Petitioner, 

v.

WALTER FABIAN CARRAZAN, 

Respondent. 

____________________________________/ 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties have filed a Joint

Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (“Stipulation”) [ECF No. 37]. The parties also ask the Court 

to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of their settlement. See Stipulation at 1. After careful review, 

we ORDER AND ADJUDGE as follows:

1. The claims between the Plaintiff and the Defendant are DISMISSED with prejudice.

2. The above-styled action shall remain administratively CLOSED. 

3. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ Stipulation.

4. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT and any scheduled hearings are 

TERMINATED.

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 28, 2022.

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 0:22-cv-61383-RKA Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2022 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Published elsewhere 
in this issue.

STATUS: Closed meeting.

PLACE: 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, D.C.

DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED: June 5, 2000.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Cancellation of Meeting.
    The closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, June 15, 2000 at 11 a.m. 
has been canceled.

    Dated: June 6, 2000.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14581 Filed 6-6-00; 11:10 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
2023 Annual Conference Agenda

Time Session

9:00am – 9:05am Welcome & Opening Remarks

9:05am – 10:35am Plenary 1: Facilitating Collaboration in Dispute Resolution with Tools from Other Disciplines

• Luella Wong, CEO and Founder, Lunar, Inc.

10:35am – 10:45am Morning Break

10:45am – 11:15am

Plenary 2: The Neutral as Advocate

• Sarah Gill, Ombuds, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

• Stacy Puente, Ombuds, US Securities & Exchange Commission

11:15am – 11:45pm Plenary 3: IOA Government Sector Survey Data Review

• Tim Hedeen, Professor & former University Ombuds, Kennesaw State University

11:45am – 12:00pm

Ombuds Organization Updates

• Dr. Alicia Booker and Ellen Miller, International Ombuds Association

President and Executive Director

• Jordan Steffen, United States Ombudsman Association President

• Ken Skodacek, Ryan Smith, and Meg Willoughby, ABA Ombuds Committee 

Co-Chairs

12:00pm – 12:10pm Blip 1: This Ombuds For You

• Dr. Belinda Robinson, Associate Ombudsman, Federal Bureau of Investigation

12:10pm – 1:10pm Lunch

1:10pm – 1:20pm Blip 2: An Icebreaker About Water

• Sandi Moore, Associate Ombuds, National Reconnaissance Office

1:20pm – 1:35pm COFO Mentoring Committee Update

1:35pm – 1:45pm COFO Peer Practitioner Network Update

1:45pm – 2:45pm Plenary 4: Gossip’s Hidden Virtues: How Ombuds Use Gossip as a Catalyst for Positive Change

• Teresa Ralicki, Ombuds Analyst, Pinterest

2:45pm – 3:00pm

Plenary 5: Being an Ombuds JEDI: Addressing Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion

• Yvonne Vissing, Professor, Salem State University & Policy Chair, UN 

Convention of the Rights of the Child

3:00pm – 3:10pm Afternoon Break

3:10pm – 3:40pm

Plenary 6: Evaluation of Ombuds Conflict Coaching Services at the Office of Collaborative Action 

and Dispute Resolution, U.S. Department of the Interior, FY 2020-2022

• Mary Chavez Rudolph, Ombuds, Office of Collaborative Action & Dispute 

Resolution, Department of the Interior

• Will Hall, Director, Office of Collaborative Action & Dispute Resolution,

Department of the Interior

3:40pm – 4:40pm

Plenary 7: Me, Myself, and AI

• Dr. Clare Fowler, Executive Vice President & Managing Editor, Mediate.com

• Colin Rule, President & CEO, Mediate.com

4:40pm – 5:00pm COFO Executive Committee Q&A & Closing Remarks
Exhibit 31.1

          CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
       15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d) (SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT)
                                  CERTIFICATION

                         I, Levi Mochkin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Avenue Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Avenue Group,
Inc. as of, and for the periods presented in this report.

4. Avenue Group, Inc.'s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for Avenue Group, Inc. and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to Avenue Group, Inc., including its consolidated
subsidiary, is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of Avenue Group, Inc.'s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any changes in Avenue Group Inc.'s internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during Avenue Group Inc.'s fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Avenue Group, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting: and

5. Avenue Group, Inc.'s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Avenue Group, Inc.'s auditors and the audit committee of Avenue Group, Inc.'s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect Avenue Group, Inc.'s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in Avenue Group, Inc.'s internal control
over financial reporting.

                                 April 30, 2006


/s/ Levi Mochkin
-------------------------------------
Levi Mochkin
Chief Executive Officer and President
and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Onvia, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cameron S. Way, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      Cameron S. WayCameron
      S. WayChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      31, 2009







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Onvia, Inc. and will be retained by Onvia,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  AF Extended Debriefings

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/AF Extended Debriefings AF Extended DebriefingsADR2022-02-18T15:04:46-05:00
			
			AF Extended DebriefingsThere are three simple reasons to pursue an extended debriefing: (1) avoid protest litigation; (2) avoid mission disruption; and (3) become better prepared in the event that protest litigation proves to be unavoidable.
While some may believe that providing more information to an unsuccessful offeror increases the likelihood of a protest, the success stories demonstrate otherwise.  Even where an unsuccessful offeror elects to submit a protest following an extended debriefing, the agency has found itself better poised to defend against that protest.  Moreover, preparing for an extended debriefing enables the contracting officer, source selection team and their counsel to re-examine the decision-making process and ascertain if any critical mistakes exist.  The extended debriefing also limits a protester’s ability to speculate about why it did not receive award because the protestor’s outside counsel has been given all the relevant facts during the extended debriefing.  The extended debriefing frequently narrows the issues that can be protested.
In many cases, using an extended debriefing provides a win-win benefit for both the government and an unsuccessful offeror.  Through this transparent process, the unsuccessful offeror is provided reassurance that its proposal was treated fairly and properly evaluated.  The extended debriefing also provides for more efficient resolution of potential protest issues in a much shorter time frame than if the protester had proceeded to litigate at either the GAO or COFC.  In turn, the government reaps huge rewards by avoiding protracted litigation and mission disruption, and by securing the protester’s confidence in the source selection evaluation and contract award process. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   36,751
<RECEIVABLES>                                  177,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,782
<INVENTORY>                                    134,294
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               536,079
<PP&E>                                         520,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                 306,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,396,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          451,866
<BONDS>                                        641,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    46,941
<COMMON>                                       2,548
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,396,201
<SALES>                                        278,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               302,839
<CGS>                                          271,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  283,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               35,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,550)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,280)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         June 5, 2000.                    

*Time:*                         5 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To Review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         NIH, Rockledge 2, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Bruce Maurer, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5222, MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1168.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine, 93.306; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 30, 2000.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 00-14331  Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M