alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 00-065]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC), Astronmical Search for Origins and Planetary Systems 
(ORIGINS); Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory 
Council, Space Science Advisory Committee, ORIGINS Subcommittee.

DATES: Tuesday, June 13, 2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Wednesday, June 14, 
2000, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 E Street, 
SW, Program Review Center (PRC) 9H40 Washington, DC, 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Anne L. Kinney, Code S, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-
0362.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

    --Next Generation Space Telescope
    --Discussion on Wide Field Camera 3
    --Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy Archive Nexus

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate 
the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors will be 
requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: May 30, 2000.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 00-14040 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-P
i h,~; 

QFFICE OF R-SE4 

TEE AIYTOIRNEY GENERAL 

A~STIN,TE~S 

Honorable aso. w. co*, Y. Ti., 

State Eealth Otffoer 

Taxer, Stats Doard of EIomlth 

~wwll, %x(14 

f"sair sir: Opiniolr NO. Y-155 

Ii.: kliglblllty of a mh2vhI 

edpplaa 0lllU f0r bQuoflt8 

Under Artleh WOO, V.U.S. 

seof~on 2 or th6 law ;a au r0ii0w 

0r age, whore pr~yulaal r-300tions 3r zmcnae0t.r 

an lapairstl by xaa@oo~\ of a leiat, bona, Or me010 

thrm or dauormft~, to ths extant that the 0hlla 

10 or say b6 exptmtsd to be totslly or partla1l.l 

iwep40lt~t6Q for aduoation or raurativ* 

OQQU tioa. 

acm 3" de War thlm Aat, t!?c? obild’r dlaabllity 

To b8 o.U&ble for raabilltati0a 

z&r&et be auah that it i8 rsssoaabla to arpwt 

that SUO~ ohild QBA be iOpm?Cd thmU@ hfmpltalioatloa, aedioal OF surgiaal oare, artfflalel 

epjMaauos, or thrtqb a ooatblmtlon of these 

aenio44 .* 
Cbere tSpr statute 10 axprasset fA plain and ua- 

~aablguops lna(~~aqs, and it.8 moenlae is clear and ob~loun, thma 

16 IUI TOOSI TOT OOAStW0tiOA. Caddy ~8. Flmt Rational Bank of 

I306UmOnt, 2:83 :J. ~. 472; Zparks 08. State, 174 3. ty. SS; PIem*- 

?ard 08 Of1 nssoeletion TB. Warner milling Co., 187 C&.516. 

The I angts(r,c of 3cotion 2 is in plain, o.@er sad afmmblgobu 

term8 and do08 not croopt SCIZT:U~ *ohlltrm* rra0 it8 prori8i0~ 

by PS8610R Of vrhiCh thfiTQ is ~3 XNXI rOC OOIBStrttati0ZL TbWfON, 

It lo the ophion or tua 0rri0e that married orippled poxmom 

trndr~ 21 ~62~3-6 0r~ep arc eugible r0r hrmmi 0r said ileotfon 

2 ir thny Ora! at~eTwlao oLl.dbls. 

.izmMAal[ 

tai6mled aIlpp1si3 perso?Ja u&lor 21 ymI3-m OS 

gge am ollglbla for trm benofltr or Artlole 

If oth'wlse sllF;lble. Art. 44190, 

Youra tory tm17 

AZQWT WUi!RAL OF TJZA3 

\= (%c.aCb) @id T. -ftilliM~ 

Asslatant
GAO/AIMD-00-241R Navy Wives Clubs of America

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

Accounting and Information

Management Division

B-285431

June 30, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the Navy Wives Clubs of America for Fiscal Years 1997 and 1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the Navy

Wives Clubs of America, a federally chartered corporation, for the fiscal years ended

August 31, 1997 and 1998. The corporation’s purpose is to promote a friendly relationship

between the wives of enlisted men who are serving in the active Navy, Marine Corps, and

Coast Guard or in the Active Reserves of those services.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the corporation’s

income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditor’s report and the corporation’s financial statements to the Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with the

financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we reviewed the

corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes, performed certain analytical

procedures related to information presented in the financial statements, reviewed the

auditor’s report, and made inquiries to corporation officials or the auditor as we deemed

necessary. We did not review the auditor’s working papers. Our review disclosed no

reportable instances of noncompliance.
B-285431

Page 2 GAO/AIMD-00-241R Navy Wives Clubs of America

The audit report included the auditor’s opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly, in all material respects, on a modified cash basis of

accounting. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

David L. Clark

Director, Audit Oversight and Liaison

Enclosure

(911980)
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1341 Regulated Navigation Area; Lake Washington, Seattle, WA. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a regulated navigation area: All waters of Lake Washington south of the Interstate 90 Floating West Bound Bridge and north of the points between Bailey Peninsula at 47°33′14.4′′ N, 122°14′47.3′′ W and Mercer Island at 47°33′24.5′′ N, 122°13′52.5′′ W.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this section, *designated representative* means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the enforcement of the regulated navigation zone.
( c ) *Regulations.* All vessels and persons transiting the regulated navigation area described in paragraph (a) of this section must proceed at a speed which creates minimum wake, 7 miles per hour or less, unless a higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain bare steerageway.
( d ) *Enforcement periods.* This section will be enforced annually immediately before and after Seafair events which usually occurs during the last week in July and the first two weeks of August. The event will be one week or less in duration and the specific dates and times of the enforcement periods will be published in a notice of enforcement in the Federal Register.
[USCG-2019-0296, 84 FR 71824, Dec. 30, 2019]
#### State of Iowa, appellant, v. Raymond James Koeppel, appellee.

No. 49714.

(Reported in 97 N.W.2d 926)

July 24, 1959.

*1053Norman A. Erbe, Attorney General, Hugh Y. Faulkner, Assistant Attorney General, Martin D. Leir, County Attorney, and Edward N. Wehr, Assistant County Attorney, for appellant.

Walter E. Kroeger, of Davenport, for appellee.

Thornton, J.

October 16, 1958, a county attorney’s information was filed charging defendant with robbery with aggravation in violation of section 711.2 of the 1958 Code of Iowa, the defendant was arraigned on the same day and entered a plea of not guilty. November 4 defendant asked leave to withdraw his plea of not guilty, which leave was granted. Defendant then offered to plead guilty to the lesser and included offense of assault with intent to commit robbery as defined in section 694.7. Over the objection of the assistant county attorney the court accepted such plea and set sentencing for November 14. November 20 the court sentenced defendant as provided in section 694.7 and suspended the sentence pursuant to section 247.20.

The State appeals from the ruling and judgment of the court accepting the plea to the included offense over the objection of the assistant county attorney on November 4, which ruling was entered November 20. We are not favored with a brief and argument on behalf of the defendant.

Frequently we entertain appeals by the State presenting legal questions the determination of which will be an aid and guide to trial courts in the future. See section 793.20 of 1958 Code of Iowa; State v. Rasmus (1958) 249 Iowa 1084, 90 N.W.2d 429; State v. Haesemeyer, 248 Iowa 154, 79 N.W.2d 755; State v. Hill, 244 Iowa 405, 57 N.W.2d 58, and citations.

The State argues that the trial court has no power to accept a plea to the lesser included offense over the objection of the county attorney. Under the record presented here we think it was error to accept the plea to the lesser offense.

 We have before us the abstract of the record and the clerk’s transcript. Neither shows any basis for the action of the trial court. The record shows the only fact ascertained by the trial court was that the age of defendant was eighteen at the *1054time of the offense. If there was power to act at all, the action must be based upon sound judicial discretion. An abuse of discretion is reviewable by this court. Where, as here, the court has no knowledge other than the age of the defendant and accepts a plea over the objection of the county attorney we are compelled to hold such action is an abuse of discretion. We have held in civil cases that a court may not act upon its own knowledge or knowledge gained in a previous case. Van Donselaar v. Van Donselaar (1958) 249 Iowa 504, 87 N.W.2d 311.

As having some bearing see: State v. Powers, 239 Iowa 430, 30 N.W.2d 476; State v. Asbury, 172 Iowa 606, 154 N.W. 915; section 769.26 of the 1958 Code of Iowa; and State v. English, 242 Iowa 248, 46 N.W.2d 13. — Reversed.

All Justices concur.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -** **2012 -**  **0887** Docket Number

**2009 -**  **SW -**  **02 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Eurocopter Ale rt Service Bulletin (ASB) No. ASB - MBB - BK117 - 30 - 113, dated September 23, 2008; Eurocopter ASB No. ASB BO105 - 30 - 116, dated September 23, 2008; and Eurocopter Canada Limited ASB No. ASB BO 105 LS 30 - 12, dated December 12, 2008.



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

d/b/a VPX and as BANG ENERGY, a 

Florida Corporation, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

MONSTER BEVERAGE CORPORATION, 

a Delaware Corporation, MONSTER 

ENERGY COMPANY, a Delaware 

Corporation, and RODNEY CYRIL SACKS, 

an individual.

 Defendants.

Case No.: 22-cv-61621

PLAINTIFF VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.’S 

NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE [ECF NO. 14] 

Plaintiff Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. d/b/a VPX and as Bang Energy (“VPX”), by and 

through undersigned counsel and pursuant to this Court’s Order to Show Cause [ECF No. 14] (the 

“Order”), notifies the Court of its compliance with the Order and states:

1. On November 10, 2022, this Court entered an Order requiring VPX to “perfect 

service on Defendants and file proof of service on the docket by November 29, 2022.” [ECF No. 

14] (emphasis in original). 

2. On November 10, 2022, VPX served Defendant Monster Beverage Corporation. 

See Affidavit of Service [ECF No. 15]. 

3. On November 10, 2022, VPX served Defendant Monster Energy Company. See 

Affidavit of Service [ECF No. 16]. 

4. On November 15, 2022, VPX served Defendant Rodney Cyril Sacks. See Affidavit 

of Service [ECF No. 17]. 

Case 0:22-cv-61621-RKA Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

5. As a result of the above, VPX has complied with the Court’s Order. 

Dated: November 18, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

SANCHEZ FISCHER LEVINE, LLP

1200 Brickell Avenue, Ste. 750

Miami, Florida 33131

Tel.: (305) 925-9947

By: /s/Veronica M. Rabinowitz

Veronica M. Rabinowitz, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 99618

Email: vrabinowitz@sfl-law.com

David M. Levine, Esq. 

Florida Bar No.: 84431

Email: dlevine@sfl-law.com

Secondary email: eservice@sfl-law.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Vital Pharmaceuticals, 

Inc., d/b/a VPX and as Bang Energy

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 18, 2022, I electronically filed the forgoing

document with theClerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being

served this day on all counsel of record via electronic transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF and/or via separate email.

By: /s/Veronica M. Rabinowitz

Veronica M. Rabinowitz, Esq. 

Case 0:22-cv-61621-RKA Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/18/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 173.35 Coast Guard validation sticker.

No person may operate a vessel except a vessel exempted in § 173.13 that has a number issued by the Coast Guard unless it has the validation sticker issued with the certificate of number displayed within 6 inches of the number.

[CGD 72-54R, 37 FR 21399, Oct. 7, 1972, as amended by USCG-2003-14963, 77 FR 18700, Mar. 28, 2012]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-04-1999
<CASH>                                         6
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                   294
<INVENTORY>                                    13,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,979
<PP&E>                                         40,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 54,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,023
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7,075
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   54,038
<SALES>                                        21,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21,125
<CGS>                                          15,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,492
<INCOME-TAX>                                   947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,545
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .61
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10(viii)

DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT



Agreement made on December 19, 2002 between Carmine Bua with offices located at 3838 Camino del Rio North, San Diego, CA 92108-1789, referred to as Creditor and Sona Development Corp. with offices located at 1818-1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2K3 referred to as Debtor.



SECTION ONE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF EXISTING OBLIGATION



The parties acknowledge that Debtor is at present indebted to Creditor in the sum of $3,203 for legal services rendered.



SECTION TWO
AGREEMENT FOR DIFFERENT METHOD OF PAYMENT



Debtor and Creditor desire and agree, to provide for the payment of the above-stated indebtedness in accordance with terms an provisions different from, and in substitution of, the terms and obligations for payment for same contained in the original loan obligation as described in Section One above.



SECTION THREE
CONSIDERATION



In consideration of the mutual promises contained in this Agreement, Debtor and Creditor agree as follows:



|a. | Method of Payment:Debtor agrees to pay to Creditor and Creditor agrees to accept from Debtor, in full satisfaction of the indebtedness described in Section One, above, 32,030 shares of Debtor's common stock, valued at $0.10 a share, as consideration for monies owed to Creditor as a result of services provided by Creditor to Debtor.   
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|b. | Satisfaction: On execution of this Agreement and Creditor's board of directors resolution authorizing the issuance of 32,030 shares of Debtor's common stock to Creditor provided for in Section Three (a) above, the original indebtedness of Debtor to Creditor, as described in Section One, above, will be forever cancelled and discharged.



In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement in Vancouver, British Columbia on the date first mentioned above.



Sona Development Corp.





/s/ Nora CoccaroBy: Nora Coccaro, President



Carmin Bua



/s/ Carmin BuaCarmin Bua

- 27 -

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

Mineral Wool Production - Industry Meeting 

(January 28, 2010)

Background Information

1. Residual Risk and Technology Review (RTR)

- Risk modeling based on updated emissions data (after ANPRM comments) 

 Cancer 

- Risk drivers: Arsenic compounds and beryllium compounds

- Most metal HAP emissions were not reported by the 8 operating plants

- Emission factor based on PM, developed from closed facility (the only facility

that provided speciated PM/metals data)

 Chronic Noncancer (risk driver  formaldehyde)

 Acute Noncancer (risk driver  formaldehyde)

Mineral Wool Production NESHAP (subpart DDD)

Emission Point Source Limit Comments

Cupola Existing 0.10 lb PM per ton of melt PM surrogate for metal 

HAP; fumes captured 

and controlled by 

baghouses/fabric filters

New 0.10 lb PM per ton of melt; 

0.10 lb CO per ton of melt 

or reduce uncontrolled CO 

emissions ≥99%

CO surrogate for COS; 

CO limit based on 

incinerator and fabric 

filter test 

Curing Oven Existing & 

New

0.06 lb formaldehyde per 

ton of melt or reduce 

uncontrolled formaldehyde 

emissions ≥80%

Organic HAP binder; 

formaldehyde is a 

surrogate for phenol 

and methanol. 

Fiber Collection & 

Cooling Chamber

Existing & 

New

Not regulated under 

MACT – source of 

formaldehyde, phenol, and 

methanol emissions

No MACT floor could 

be determined; abovethe-floor too costly 

(thermal incineration).
2

List of U.S. operating facilities provided by NAIMA 

Company Location Bonded 

Lines

Unbonded 

Lines

Cupola 

Controls

Curing 

Controls

Amerock Nolanville, TX 0 2 baghouse n/a

Isolatek Huntington, IN 0 2 baghouse n/a

Industrial 

Insulation 

Group (IIG)

Phenix City, AL 1 1 incinerator 

and baghouse

recuperative 

incinerator

Rock Wool 

Mfg

Leeds, AL 1 1 baghouse Partial –> 

redirect 

exhaust (?)

Sloss (now 

Walter Energy)

Birmingham, 

AL

0 5 5 cupolas, 1 

baghouse

n/a

Thermafiber Wabash, IN 1 1 baghouse RTO

USG Walworth, WI 0 1 baghouse thermal 

incinerator

USG Red Wing, MN 0 2 baghouse thermal 

incinerator

2. Technical Issues Arising From 1/14/2009 Administrative Petition

- Lack of COS emission standards (existing and new cupolas)

- Standards for organic HAP other than formaldehyde (e.g., phenol)

- Validation of formaldehyde surrogacy for phenol for different controls

- Examine process used to set formaldehyde limits 

3. Information Collection Request (ICR)

- Facility/equipment/process/controls information (electronic survey)

- Emissions testing for:

o Cupolas (PM, HAP metals, CO, and COS) 

o Curing ovens (formaldehyde, phenol, other organic HAP) 

o Fiber collection and cooling (formaldehyde, phenol, other organic 

HAP)

- Schedule: send out in February 2010; test data and responses due June 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the "Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 * information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Christopher Ryan
 Christopher Ryan
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 Date: November 11, 2010
 
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.