alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS,
INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350:AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, William S. Urkiel, Chief Financial Officer of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   August 16, 2004

|/s/ WILLIAM S. URKIELWilliam S. Urkiel                      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09260**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 09260\09260_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09260\09260_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09260\09260_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09260\09260_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09260\09260_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09260\09260_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09260\09260_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09260\09260_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09260\Certification Statement Plant ID 09260.pdf Plant certification statement x 09260\Supplemental Documents\09260 Calc Sheet.doc EPA Technical Review Notes

09260\Supplemental Documents\09260_ME_A5-2 Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09260\Supplemental Documents\09260_ME_A5-3_Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09260\09260_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
> Exhibit 99.2

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ace Hardware Corporation (the "Company") 
 on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and 
 Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), the undersigned Executive Vice 
 President (Principal Financial Accounting Officer) of the Company hereby certifies, 
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 
 2002 that: 
1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) 
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 
2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
     the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the 
     periods covered in the Report./s/ Rita D. Kahle
Rita D. Kahle
Executive Vice President 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
August 13, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6182
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDDIE AUBREY MCALLISTER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-20-F, CA-95-152-7-F) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Aubrey McAllister, Appe llant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Atto rney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McAllister ,Nos. CA-93-20-F; CA-95-152-7-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 20.202 Powers. The ALJ shall have all powers necessary to the conduct of fair, fast, and impartial hearings, including the powers to— ( a ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( b ) Issue subpoenas authorized by law;
( c ) Rule on motions;
( d ) Order discovery as provided for in this part;
( e ) Hold hearings or settlement conferences;
( f ) Regulate the course of hearings;
( g ) Call and question witnesses;
( h ) Issue decisions;
( i ) Exclude any person from a hearing or conference for disrespect, or disorderly or rebellious conduct; and
( j ) Institute policy authorized by the Chief ALJ.
GRUMER LAW, P.A. 

2482 Eagle Watch Court, Weston, Florida 33327; Tel: (954) 303-3000

Email: eservice@grumerlaw.com; kgrumer@grumerlaw.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 22-cv-61719-BB

GARFIELD SPENCE, individually, 

 Plaintiff

v. 

GOLDEN TRIANGLE PROPERTIES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

COME NOW Defendant GOLDEN TRIANGLE PROPERTIES, INC. (“Defendant”) and 

Plaintiff GARFIELD SPENCE, individually (“Plaintiff”), by and through their undersigned 

counsel, and being all of the parties to this action, jointly stipulate and agree pursuant to applicable 

rules that this action, and each and every count and claim asserted therein, be dismissed without

prejudice, each party to bear their own costs, expenses and fees.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 1, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

was served via CM/ECF electronic transmission upon those parties who are registered with the 

Court to receive electronic notifications in this matter.

Case 0:22-cv-61719-BB Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

GRUMER LAW, P.A. 

2482 Eagle Watch Court, Weston, Florida 33327; Tel: (954) 303-3000

Email: eservice@grumerlaw.com; kgrumer@grumerlaw.com

/ s / Alberto R. Leal, Esq. . 

Alberto R. Leal, Esq., P.A. 

Florida Bar No.: 1002345 

8927 Hypoluxo Rd. #157 

Lake Worth, FL 33467 

Phone: 954-637-1868 

E-Mail: albertolealesq@gmail.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Keith T. Grumer, Esq. 

KEITH T. GRUMER, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 504416 

GRUMER LAW, P.A.

Attorneys for Defendant

2482 Eagle Watch Court

Weston, Florida 33327

Tel: 954-303-3000

Primary E-mail: kgrumer@grumerlaw.com

Secondary E-mail: slopez@grumerlaw.com

 eservice@grumerlaw.com

Case 0:22-cv-61719-BB Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2023 Page 2 of 2
Rockingham

No. 7938

#### Town of Exeter v. Harold Lampert *& a.*

May 9, 1978

*Kearns & Colliander,*of Exeter, by brief for the plaintiff.

*Allen L. Lampert,*pro se, and *Andrew J. Melechinsky,*attorney in fact, by brief for the defendants.

Memorandum Opinion

After a trial before a master, defendants, who were represented by counsel, were found to be in violation of the Exeter zoning ordi*329nance by maintaining a sign on the side of their building made with *eight*4' x 8' plywood panels. The ordinance was found to have been validly adopted in 1973 and to have created a land conservation district in which no signs were permitted. The master found, however, that a sign made with *one 4'*x 8' panel existed before the enactment of the ordinance and found it to be a nonconforming use, which could be continued. *DiClerico,*J., affirmed the recommendation that ordered the defendants to remove the large sign, restrained them from reinstalling it, and imposed a fine under the zoning ordinance of $10 for each day they allowed the large sign to remain. An appropriate decree was entered on January 18, 1977. The defendants did not perfect an appeal, and the court on March 24, 1977, made an order that exceptions were waived and the decree final as of March 25,1977.

The defendants did not remove the sign. On May 6, 1977, the town filed a motion for civil contempt. A hearing was held before *Perkins,*J., in June. At that hearing the court granted defendants’ motion to allow Mr. Melechinsky, a nonlawyer, to appear for them along with a member of the New Hampshire bar. At this hearing, defendants attempted to raise issues relating to the constitutionality of the ordinance and other constitutional questions. They were not permitted to do so but were confined to the question whether they had complied with the order to remove the sign. Defendants were found in contempt and ordered to pay a fine of $1,420 representing $10 per day for 142 days. Plaintiffs were authorized to enter on the premises and remove the sign if defendants failed to do so. *Perkins,*J., transferred defendants’ exceptions.

 By their failure to appeal, defendants became bound by the findings and rulings of the court based on the master’s report dated January 15, 1977. The court properly restricted the scope of the defendants’ arguments in the civil contempt proceeding. *See generally Nottingham v. Cedar Waters, Inc.,*118 N.H. 282, 385 A.2d 851 (1978). No penalty involving loss of liberty was imposed; therefore, there was no right to a trial by jury at the contempt hearing. *Codispoti v. Pennsylvania,*418 U.S. 506 (1974); *Taylor v. Hayes,*418 U.S. 488 (1974); *cf. Dyke v. Taylor Implement Mfg. Co.,*391 U.S. 216 (1968); *see State v. Ray,*63 N.H. 406, 407 (1885). The fine here was not clearly “payable to the complainant,” *Nottingham supra,*and therefore the matter must be remanded to have the order amended by the trial court.

*Exceptions overruled; remanded.*
§ 25.111 Action by claimant. ( a ) *Form of claim.* The claim must meet the requirements of § 25.113. Authorized forms are available from the offices indicated in § 25.103.
( b ) *Presentation.* Whenever possible, the claim must be presented to the Coast Guard Legal Service Command, Claims Division (LSC-5), located at 300 East Main Street, Suite 400, Norfolk, VA 23510-9100. If that is not possible, the claim may also be presented to: ( 1 ) The commanding officer of the Coast Guard unit involved;
( 2 ) A Coast Guard unit convenient to the claimant; or
( 3 ) Commandant (CG-0945), Attn: Office of Claims and Litigation, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7213, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7213. Note to paragraph ( b
):
In a foreign country, where there is no Coast Guard unit, the claim is considered presented to the Coast Guard if it is presented to the military attache of any United States embassy or consulate or to the commanding officer of any unit of the armed services of the United States.
( c ) *Time.* The time limits for presenting claims are contained in the following subparts addressing particular claim statutes.
[CGD 80-033, 46 FR 27109, May 18, 1981, as amended by CGD 87-008b, 52 FR 25217, July 6, 1987; CGD 97-023, 62 FR 33362, June 19, 1997; USCG-2001-9286, 66 FR 33639, June 25, 2001; USCG-2009-0416, 74 FR 27437, June 10, 2009; USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36278, June 25, 2010; USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38428, July 7, 2014]
ex73.htm






  





  











  













 



Exhibit 10.73




DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 







 


 







 


 


$300,000                                                                           Date:  May 24, 2012


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Warren Breslow, the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($300,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.

















_/s/ Melvin Gagerman___________________


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated: May 24, 2012
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION

CASE NO.: 22-cv-22922-KMM

WINDY LUCIUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BBRG GLADES ROAD TR, LLC 

d/b/a Abe & Louie’s Steakhouse restaurant and

TAVISTOCK RESTAURANTS, LLC

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, WINDY LUCIUS, by and through the undersigned counsel, 

hereby notifies the Court that the Parties have reached an agreement in principle that resolves all 

claims that were or could have been brought in this action and are in the process of working on the 

Settlement Agreement. The Parties request that the Court stay all matters and pending deadlines 

in this action and grant the Parties sixty (60) days to finalize their written Settlement Agreement 

and to submit the appropriate notices and/or stipulations to the Court regarding dismissal of the 

Action.

Respectfully submitted on this November 30, 2022. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-22922-KMM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 1 of 2
Lucius v. BBRG Glades Rd. et al

Case No. 22-cv-22922-KMM

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this November 30, 2022, an electronic copy of the foregoing 

document was filed with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notice of 

electronic filing to all parties and Counsel of record. 

By: /s/ J. Courtney Cunningham 

J. Courtney Cunningham, Esq.

FBN: 628166

J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

8950 SW 74th Court, Suite 2201

Miami, Florida 33156

T: 305-351-2014

cc@cunninghampllc.com 

legal@cunninghampllc.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 1:22-cv-22922-KMM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2022 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2348-000]

Take notice that on June 2, 2000, Westar Generating II, Inc. filed a Notice of Withdrawal of its April 28, 2000, application for acceptance of the Purchase Power Agreement between Westar and Western Resources, Inc.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 16, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14710 Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip DeZwirek, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Phillip DeZwirek     
|Phillip DeZwirek         
|Chairman of the Board and
|Chief Executive Officer  
|May 11, 2006             

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CECO Environmental
Corp. and will be retained by CECO Environmental Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



21
Letter from the General Partner to Krom River Trading A.G. and Krom River



 EXHIBIT 10.2(b) 
 June 1, 2012 
 Krom River Trading AG 
 Walker House 
 87 Mary Street 
 George Town 
 Grand Cayman KY1-9002 
 Cayman Islands 
 Attention: Mr. Giles Hill 

Re:     Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Mr. Hill: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 Commodity Advisors Portfolio, L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 KR Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Spectrum Currency 


 Please
acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290.

 Very truly yours, 
  

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian Centner
		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	KROM RIVER TRADING AG
		
	By:	 	/s/ Mike Cartier


			
	Print Name:	 	Mike Cartier

 BC/sr
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (159)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,367
<PP&E>                                          63,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                (36,180)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,842
<BONDS>                                          7,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           422
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,773
<SALES>                                      1,423,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,423,682
<CGS>                                        1,412,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,420,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,602
<INCOME-TAX>                                       995
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,607
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0378

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RALPH DEAVILA,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until October 31, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

September 29 2022

09/29/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0378