alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I,
      K. S. Adams, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      K.
      S. Adams, Jr.


K.
      S.
      Adams, Jr.


Chief
      Executive Officer
#### § 52.73 Interpretation.

If the intent or import of the final decision is not clear to the Coast Guard, if the Coast Guard believes that executing all or part of the order in the final decision is beyond the Coast Guard's authority, or if the Coast Guard believes that the order is incomplete because of an oversight, the final decision shall be returned to the Board for clarification or technical amendment.
EXHIBIT 1.3

                              NOTICE OF ALTERATION
                                   NAME CHANGE
                                     FORM 11



<PAGE>

Date and Time:  August 25, 2005 09:45 AM Pacific Time

BRITISH      Ministry of Finance              Mailing Address:
COLUMBIA     Corporate and Personal           PO Box 9431 Stn Prov Govt
             Property Registries              Victoria BC V8W 9V3
             www.corporateonline.gov.bc.ca
                                              Location:
                                              2nd Floor - 940 Blanshard St.
                                              Victoria, BC
                                              250 356-8626
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              NOTICE OF ALTERATION
                                    FORM 11
                            BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT
                                  Section 257

   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Filed Date and Time:         August 25, 2005 09:45 AM Pacific Time

   Alteration Date and Time:    Notice of Articles Altered on August 25, 2005
                                09:45 AM Pacific Time
   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              NOTICE OF ALTERATION


INCORPORATION NUMBER:                   NAME OF COMPANY:

C0709247                                HILTON RESOURCES LTD.


NAME RESERVATION NUMBER:                NAME RESERVED:

NR6913483                               ROCHESTER RESOURCES LTD.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALTERATION EFFECTIVE DATE:

The alteration is to take effect at the time that this application is filed with
the Registrar.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE OF NAME OF COMPANY:

FROM:                                   TO:
HILTON RESOURCES LTD.                   ROCHESTER RESOURCES LTD.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



                                                            C0709247 Page 1 OF 1

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis W. Blazer, V.P.  Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dennis W. Blazer                                                          
|Dennis W. Blazer V.P. 
Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                              
|Date:  November 9, 2009                                                       



34
[ EXHIBIT 32.2 ]

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of International Star Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Denny Cashatt, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


March 30, 2005                            /s/ Denny Cashatt
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Acting Chief
                                              Financial Officer
#### Jackson and Reno, Executors of Farrow, v. Ewell.

March 22d, 1815.

«. Forthcoming Bond* — How Judgment Obtained Thereon — Case at Bar. — A judgment cannot be obtained upon a forthcoming bond, bearing date before the 7th of January, 1807, against the sheriff to whom the estate of a deceased obligor has been committed, as against an executor or administrator in ordinary cases; — -but the plaintiff must exhibit his claim before the court, according to the act of 1792.

See Kev. Code, 1st vol. ch. 92, sect. 61, p. 167,168.

A motion was made by Farrow’s executors, September 7th, 1807, to Prince William County *Court,*against Charles Ewell, sheriff of that county, to whom the estate of Henry Dade Hooe, deceased, had been committed, for judgment and award of execution on a forthcoming bond, bearing date the 24th of July, 1806. The bond appeared to be *in regular form ; and, notice being proved, a judgment was rendered by default, “to be levied of the proper goods and chattels of the said Henry Dade Hooe, deceased, in the hands of the said Charles Ewell, to be administered, if so much thereof In his hands he hath ; if not, then the costs of the proper goods and chattels of the said Ewell, &c.”(1)

Upon a writ of supersedeas, this judgment was reversed by the superior court of law, on the 21st May, 1813, without proceeding to render such judgment as the county court ought to have rendered ; — to which judgment of reversal, a supersedeas was awarded by a judge of this court.

Stanard, for the plaintiffs in error,

relied upon the act, “directing the mode of proceeding against decedent’s estates, and providing a mode of reviving suits in certain cases,” passed the 7th of January, 1807, (Rev. Code, 2d vol. p. 120,) as authorizing the motion and judgment in this case.

No counsel appeared for the defendant.

*

See monographic *note*on “Statutory Bonds” appended to Goolsby v. Strother. 21 Gratt. 107.

(1)

 Note. The last member of this judgment seems altogether erroneous; even if this case were to be governed by the act of January 7th, 1807. See the last proviso in the 3d section of that act. —Note in Original Edition.

March 28th, 1815,

JUDGE ROANE

pronounced the court’s opinion, that there was no error in the judgment of the superior court of law, so far as it reversed the judgment of the county court, but that the said superior court erred in not proceeding to render such judgment as the county court ought to have rendered.

Both judgments reversed (with costs to the defendant as being the party substantially prevailing,) and judgment entered, that the plaintiffs take nothing by their motion, &c.
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
  In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BSI2000, Inc.,
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, I, Jack Harper, Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of BSI2000, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:
  1. Such
report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and
  2. The
information contained in such report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of BSI2000, Inc.
  Date:
      April __, 2005
    **BSI2000,
      INC.**By:
    */s/
      Jack Harper*Jack
      Harper,President (Principal
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer) and Director
 
 
 
 33
#### § 169.120 When is the southeastern reporting system in effect?

The mandatory ship reporting system in the southeastern United States operates during the period beginning on November 15 each year through April 16 of the following year.

[USCG-1999-5525, 66 FR 58070, Nov. 20, 2001]
**MOORE
      & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED**


****** ***ACCOUNTANTS
      AND ADVISORS***


***PCAOB
      REGISTERED***







**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the use, in the registrations statement on Form 10-KSB of Secured
      Financial Network Inc, of our report dated May 11, 2006 on our audit of the
      financial statements of Secured Financial Network Inc as of December 31, 2006,
      and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended December
      31,
      2006 and the reference to us under the caption “Experts.”







***/s/
      Moore & Associates, Chartered***


Moore
      & Associates Chartered


Las
      Vegas, Nevada


May
      15,
      2006



























































*2675
      S. Jones Blvd. Suite 109, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7511 Fax (702)253-7501*
§ 5.18 Injury or death in the line of duty. ( a ) The performance of duty, as the term is used in this part, includes time spent in the performance of duty, travel between duty locations, and travel between a place of assigned duty and either the Auxiliarist's permanent residence or other appropriate non-duty destination.
( b ) A member of the Auxiliary who incurs physical injury or contracts sickness or disease in the performance of duty is entitled to medical and dental care until the resulting impairment cannot be materially improved by further hospitalization or treatment. A member of the Auxiliary who incurs physical injury or contracts sickness or disease in the performance of duty is entitled to obtain medical care from the Coast Guard, including through Coast Guard arrangements with a contract provider, the Public Health Service, the Department of Defense, or a Veterans' Administration facility.
( c ) If a member of the Auxiliary is physically injured or dies as a result of physical injury, and the injury is incurred in the performance of duty, the member or the member's beneficiaries are authorized to receive compensation in accordance with 14 U.S.C. 3707, 5 U.S.C. 8133 and 8134 and section 651 of Public Law 104-208 (5 U.S.C. 8133 Note).
[USCG-1999-6712, 80 FR 3476, Jan. 23, 2015, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58276, Sept. 18, 2020]
§ 334.80 Narragansett Bay, RI; restricted area. ( a ) Beginning at a point on the east shore of Conanicut Island at latitude 41°33′15′′; thence southeasterly to latitude 41°32′44′′, longitude 71°21′17′′; thence southerly to latitude 41°32′09′′, longitude 71°21′17′′; thence southeasterly to latitude 41°31′50′′, longitude 71°21′10′′; thence southeasterly to latitude 41°31′26′′, longitude 71°20′33′′ thence easterly to latitude 41°31′27′′, longitude 71°20′06′′ thence northerly to a point on the southwesterly shore of Prudence Island at latitude 41°35′00′′, thence northerly along the southwesterly shore of Prudence Island to a point at latitude 41°35′43′′ longitude 71°20′15 5′′; thence northwesterly to latitude 41°37′21′′, longitude 71°20′48′′; thence west to latitude 41°37′21′′ longitude 71°21′48′′; and thence south to latitude 41°33′54′′, longitude 71°21′48′′.
( b ) *The Regulations.* ( 1 ) No person or vessel shall at any time, under any circumstances, anchor or fish or tow a drag of any kind in the prohibited area because of the extensive cable system located therein.
( 2 ) Orders and instructions issued by patrol craft or other authorized representatives of the enforcing agency shall be carried out promptly by persons or vessels in or in the vicinity of the prohibited area.
( 3 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Commander U.S. Naval Base, Newport, RI, and such agencies as he may designate.
[33 FR 4464, Mar. 13, 1968. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985; 58 FR 37608, July 12, 1993; 62 FR 17552, Apr. 10, 1997]
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RELM Wireless Corporation, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RELM Wireless Corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 4, 2006

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ WILLIAMP. KELLY                                 
| | William P. Kelly                                    
| | Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### WALTER S. CHURCH, Appellant, *v.*JAMES KIDD and others, Respondents.

*Payments*— *application of*— *interest*— when *allowed.*

Kidd and Cagger held certain manorial leases, as trustees, to secure the payment of advances made thereon by certain of the defendants, after the payment of which the leases were to be assigned to the plaintiff. Philip Church took a subsequent lien on them for $45,000, which was afterward assigned to Kidd and Cagger, under an agreement authorizing him (Philip Church) to redeem within ten years on payment of $18,000 and interest, to be compounded semi-annually, with annual rests. The equity of redemption was subsequently assigned by Philip Church to the plaintiff.

In this action, brought by the plaintiff to procure an assignment of the leases, upon payment of what was due from him, an accounting was had; the plaintiff insists that the referee erred in not applying payments, made by him to Cagger, first upon the Philip Church contract, so as to stop a harsh rate of interest. *Held*(1), that, as plaintiff was under no obligation to pay the amount secured by the Philip Church contract, under the assignment of the latter’s equity of redemption, Cagger had no right to apply the money received by him, as trustee, inpayment thereof; (2), that Cagger had an absolute right to appropriate the moneys received or collected toward the payment of the first and oldest lien; and that plaintiff had no right, equitable or otherwise, to require payments received by Cagger, in the ordinary business of the trust, to be applied toward the extinguishment of a collateral debt, secured by a second lien upon the trust property in his hands.

The referee allowed Cagger interest' upon the amounts due to him for legal services. *Held,*that this was proper. Where services in a particular case are rendered, or where, by contract of the parties, the amount is payable, or where it is liquidated by the fee bill, interest must be allowed upon the debt. *{Adams*v. *Port Plain BanJc,*36 ET. Y., 255; *Hadley*v. *Ayers,*12 Abb. [ET. S.], 246; *Mygatt*v. *Wilcox,*45 N. Y., 306.)

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Special Term, confirming the report of the referee in an accounting.

*476This action was brought to procure the reassignment of certain leases to the plaintiff, upon the payment by him of the amount due to the defendants. The opinion of the General Term upon an appeal from the judgment, under the provisions of which the order of reference was made, is reported in 10 Supreme Court (3 Hun), 254.°

*W. S. Revenor,*for the appellant. *George W.*Miller, for the defendant Kidd. *Samuel Rand,*for the defendants Cagger and others.

Opinion by

Boardman, J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Bookes and Boardman. JJ.

Order modified, and as modified affirmed, without costs to any of the parties.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CASE NO.: 22-CR-80144-RS

Plaintiff, 

vs. )

MARIEL TOLLINCHI )

Defendant. 

________________________________

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Attorney David K. Tucker, Esq., of the law firm of DAVID TUCKER P.A., files this Notice 

of Change of Address in the above mentioned case. All future pleadings, memoranda, 

correspondence, orders, etc., shall be sent to: 

David K. Tucker, P.A.

Ingraham Building

25 SE Second Avenue

Suite 1105

Miami, FL 33131

Cell: 305-798-5922

http://www.tuckerdefense.com 

David@tuckerdefense.com

*Cell is the easiest number to reach counsel 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ David K. Tucker, Esq.

David K. Tucker, P.A. 

Ingraham Building

25 SE Second Avenue 

Suite 1105

Miami, FL 33131

Cell: 305-798-5922 

 E-mail: david@tuckerdefense.com 

 Florida Bar No.: 406023 

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was electronically filed 

with the Clerk of Court via CM/ECF. I also certify that the attached motion was served 

electronically this day on all counsel of record via Notice of Electronic Filing generated by 

CM/ECF this September 20th, 2022. 

By:/S David K. Tucker

DAVID K. TUCKER

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/20/2022 Page 2 of 2
#### § 401.38 Limit of approach to a lock.

A vessel approaching a lock shall comply with directions indicated by the signal light system associated with the lock and in no case shall its stem pass the designated limit of approach sign while a red light or no light is displayed.

[74 FR 18995, Apr. 27, 2009]
7/28/2015 Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2035

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAABFvqQJAFf5SI8crGhIsEIyBwD3qfMUO7BCQ74YBi9P12... 1/1

Request for Information ­ FAA­2015­2035

9­AWA­AVS­333Exemptions (FAA)

Sent:Tuesday, July 28, 2015 9:01 AM

To: Allengot@gmail.com

Dear Mr. Gottfried:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015−2035).

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove

closed‐set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested

response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want

us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/11/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267­9677.

Sincerely,

Dan Ngo

FAA Office of Rulemaking