alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31(e)1**

**MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 

I, Anthony J. Topazi, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mississippi Power Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 6, 2006

/s/Anthony J. Topazi

Anthony J. Topazi

President and Chief Executive Officer
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

April 1997 2 NASS, USDA

Crop Summary: Production, United States,

1995-96 and Forecasted 1996-97

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 : Utilized Production 

 :----------------------------------------------------

 Crop : : Mar 1, : Apr 1, 

 : : 1997 : 1997

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Crop Year 1/ : 1995-96 1996-97 1996-97

 :

 : 1,000 Tons

Citrus Fruits : 

 Oranges : 11,723 12,542 12,726

 Grapefruit : 2,718 3,056 3,062

 Lemons 2/ : 992 988 950

 Tangerines : 348 428 432



U.S. Grapefruit Production
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of FinancialContent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant            to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

| /s/ Wilfred Shaw | /s/ Wilfred Shaw |
|------------------|------------------|

| --------------------------- | ------------------------------- |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------|

|   | Wilfred Shaw | Wilfred Shaw |
|--------|--------------|--------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer, | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|--------------------------|-------------------------|

|   | November 14, 2008 | November 14, 2008 |
|--------|-------------------|-------------------|

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 20.311 Withdrawal or dismissal. ( a ) An administrative proceeding may end in withdrawal without any act by an ALJ in any of the following ways: ( 1 ) By the filing of a stipulation by all parties who have appeared in the proceeding.
( 2 ) By the filing of a notice of withdrawal by the Coast Guard representative at any time before the respondent has served a responsive pleading.
( 3 ) With respect to a complaint filed under section 311(b)(6) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1321(b)(6)) or section 109(d) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. 9609(b)), by the filing of— ( i ) A notice of withdrawal by the Coast Guard representative at any time after the respondent has served a responsive pleading, but before the issuance of an order assessing or denying a class II civil penalty, together with
( ii ) A certification by the representative that the filing of the notice is due to a request by the Attorney General—in accordance with subsection 10(d) of Executive Order 12777 (56 FR 54757; 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351)—that the Coast Guard refrain from conducting an administrative proceeding.
( b ) Unless the stipulation or notice of withdrawal states otherwise, a withdrawal under paragraph (a) of this section is without prejudice.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, no administrative proceeding may end in withdrawal unless approved by an ALJ upon such terms as she or he deems proper.
( d ) Any respondent may move to dismiss a complaint, the government may move to dismiss a petition, or any party may lodge a request for relief, for failure of another party to— ( 1 ) Comply with the requirements of this part or with any order of the ALJ;
( 2 ) Show a right to relief based upon the facts or law; or
( 3 ) Prosecute the proceeding.
( e ) A dismissal resides within the discretion of the ALJ.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14580]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: International Trade Commission.

TIME AND DATE: June 12, 2000 at 2 p.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW. Washington, DC 20436 Telephone: (202) 
205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:   

    1. Agenda for future meeting: none
    2. Minutes
    3. Ratification List
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-762 (Remand)(Static Random Access Memory 
Semiconductors from Taiwan)-- briefing and vote. (The Commission will 
transmit its views on remand to the U.S. Court of International Trade 
on June 26, 2000.)
    5. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-253 and 731-TA-132, 252, 271, 276-277, 296, 
409-410, 532-534, and 536-537 (Review) (Certain Pipe and Tube from 
Argentina, Brazil, Canada, India, Korea, Mexico, Singapore, Taiwan, 
Thailand, Turkey, and Venezuela)--briefing and vote. (The Commission 
will transmit its determination to the Secretary of Commerce on June 
26, 2000).
    6. Outstanding action jackets: none
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: June 5, 2000.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14580 Filed 6-6-00; 11:09 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-U
ACL/AoD/Developmental Disabilities Councils (SCDD) Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2023 Estimated Allocation

5/18/2022

Awards for FY 2023 are based on the FY 2023 President's Budget Request.

Actual awards will be calculated using the latest data points and the 

FY 2023 Congressional Appropriations.

State/Territory

FY 2022 Current 

Level Amounts FY 2023 Estimates

Alabama $1,287,864 $1,312,386

Alaska $527,570 $590,878

Arizona $1,500,930 $1,708,008

Arkansas $769,002 $777,046

California $7,957,600 $9,329,686

Colorado $1,147,403 $1,322,037

Connecticut $724,201 $846,381

Delaware $527,570 $590,878

District of Columbia $527,570 $590,878

Florida $4,332,662 $4,988,432

Georgia $2,146,286 $2,466,767

Hawaii $527,570 $590,878

Idaho $527,570 $590,878

Illinois $2,642,154 $2,935,213

Indiana $1,488,546 $1,554,011

Iowa $774,176 $774,176

Kansas $614,590 $651,916

Kentucky $1,195,270 $1,191,705

Louisiana $1,380,778 $1,375,825

Maine $527,570 $590,878

Maryland $1,201,464 $1,359,836

Massachusetts $1,424,070 $1,526,776

Michigan $2,531,242 $2,515,386

Minnesota $1,118,538 $1,223,426

Mississippi $923,684 $936,139

Missouri $1,361,246 $1,398,888

Montana $527,570 $590,878

Nebraska $527,570 $590,878

Nevada $643,722 $779,301

New Hampshire $527,570 $590,878

New Jersey $1,794,011 $2,068,142

New Mexico $530,220 $606,202

New York $4,129,496 $4,627,375

North Carolina $2,140,169 $2,464,596

North Dakota $527,570 $590,878

Ohio $2,846,720 $2,855,746

Oklahoma $902,693 $971,387

Oregon $839,964 $925,518

Pennsylvania $3,026,520 $3,037,969

Rhode Island $527,570 $590,878

South Carolina $1,143,720 $1,223,875

South Dakota $527,570 $590,878

Tennessee $1,470,950 $1,608,257

Texas $5,907,507 $6,999,555

Utah $643,974 $704,218

Vermont $527,570 $590,878

Virginia $1,695,220 $1,854,508

Washington $1,526,688 $1,669,292

West Virginia $739,342 $739,342

Wisconsin $1,305,492 $1,331,788

Wyoming $527,570 $590,878

American Samoa $274,744 $307,713

Guam $274,744 $307,713

Northern Mariana Islands $274,744 $307,713

Puerto Rico $2,506,930 $2,546,145

Virgin Islands $274,744 $307,713

TOTAL $78,800,000 $86,710,400
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, R. Todd Bradley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of palmOne, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of palmOne, Inc.



By:

/s/    R. TODD
BRADLEYName:

R. Todd BradleyTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, Philippe
Morali, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of palmOne, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of palmOne,
Inc.



By:

/s/    PHILIPPE
MORALIName:

Philippe MoraliTitle:

Interim Chief Financial Officer
§ 334.170 Chesapeake Bay, in the vicinity of Chesapeake Beach, Md.; firing range, Naval Research Laboratory. ( a ) *The danger zone* — ( 1 ) *Area A.* A roughly rectangular area bounded on the north by latitude 38°39′55′′; on the south by latitude 38°39′09′′; on the east by longitude 76°31′03′′; and on the west by the shore of Chesapeake Bay.
( 2 ) *Area B.* The sector of a circle bounded by radii of 9,600 yards bearing 31° (to Bloody Point Bar Light) and 137°30′ (to Choptank River Approach Buoy 2), respectively, from the center at the southeast corner of building No. 3; excluding Area A.
( 3 ) *Area C.* The segment of a circle inclosed by the arcs of two circles having radii of 9,600 yards and 13,200 yards, respectively, and bounded by the extended radii marking the north and south limits of Area B. Note:
All bearings referred to true meridian.
( 4 ) *Area D.* A roughly rectangular area bounded on the north by an east-west line through Chesapeake Beach Light 2 at the entrance channel to Fishing Creek; on the south by an east-west line through Plum Point Shoal Buoy 1 northeast from Breezy Point; on the east by the established fishing structure limit line; and on the west by the shore of Chesapeake Bay.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) No person or vessel shall enter or remain in Area A at any time.
( 2 ) No person or vessel shall enter or remain in Area B or Area C between the hours of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. daily except Sundays, except that through navigation of commercial craft will be permitted in Area C at all times, but such vessels shall proceed on their normal course and shall not delay their progress.
( 3 ) No fishing structures, other than those presently in established locations, which may be maintained, will be permitted to be established in Area D without specific permission from the Commanding Officer, Naval Research Laboratory.
( 4 ) The areas will be in use throughout the year, and no further notice is contemplated that firing is continuing.
( 5 ) Prior to the conduct of each firing practice a patrol vessel will patrol the range to warn navigation. “Baker” will be flown from a conspicuous point on the patrol vessel and from a prominent position on shore.
( 6 ) This section shall be enforced by the Commander, Naval Base, Norfolk, Virginia, and such agencies as he/she may designate.
[13 FR 6916, Nov. 24, 1948, as amended at 17 FR 4832, May 28, 1952; 48 FR 54597, Dec. 6, 1983. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985, as amended at 62 FR 17552, Apr. 10, 1997]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Arkansas� timber industry, anassessment of timber product output and use**
 
1996 | 1999 | 2002 | 2005 | 2009
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.80/10:
Item Number:0083-B-19 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000645161
 
December 12, 2019
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 36144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14306]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 3, 2000.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Arvest Bank Group, Inc., Bentonville, Arkansas; to retain Arvest 
Bank, Joplin, Missouri, after its conversion from a savings bank to a 
commercial bank.

    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, 
Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 
94105-1579:
    1. American River Holdings, Sacramento, California; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of North Coast Bank, N.A., Santa Rosa, 
California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 2, 2000.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 00-14306 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 175.135 Existing equipment.

Launchers manufactured before 1 January, 1981, which do not have approval numbers are acceptable for use with meteor or parachute signals listed in Table 175.130 under § 175.130 as long as they remain in serviceable condition.

[CGD 76-183, 44 FR 73024, Dec. 17, 1979, as amended by CGD 81-038-A, 47 FR 24548, June 7, 1982; USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35534, June 30, 1998]
jQuery(document).on("ready fusion-widget-render-Fusion_Widget_Tabs",function(){jQuery(".fusion-tabs-widget .fusion-tabs-nav li a").on("click",function(n){var t=jQuery(this).data("link");n.preventDefault(),jQuery(this).parents(".fusion-tabs-nav").find("li").removeClass("active"),jQuery(this).parent().addClass("active"),jQuery(this).parents(".fusion-tabs-widget").find(".fusion-tab-content").hide(),jQuery(this).parents(".fusion-tabs-widget").find('.fusion-tab-content[data-name="'+t+'"]').fadeIn()})});
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4961 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4961

    To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to clarify the intent of 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2000

 Mr. Watt of North Carolina (for himself, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of 
Texas, Mr. Wynn, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Clyburn, Mr. Towns, Ms. 
   Norton, Mr. Fattah, Ms. Lee, Mr. Scott, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. 
   Hastings of Florida, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. Clay, Mr. Lewis of 
 Georgia, Mr. Payne, Mr. Dixon, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Waters, 
  Mr. Meeks of New York, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Bishop, Ms. 
 Carson, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Ford, Mrs. Jones of 
 Ohio, Ms. Kilpatrick, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Jackson 
 of Illinois, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Hilliard, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Owens, 
 Mr. Rush, and Mr. Jefferson) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to clarify the intent of 
                               Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voting Rights Clarification Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) the Department of Justice has consistently enforced 
        section 5 of the Voting Rights Act by interposing objections to 
        changes in qualifications, prerequisites, standards, practices, 
        or procedures relating to voting where those changes were 
        motivated by any purpose or intent to discriminate on the basis 
        of race or color, not just the limited purpose or intent to 
        retrogress;
            (2) certain aspects of recent decisions and opinions of the 
        Supreme Court have unduly narrowed the standard of review 
        applied to changes affecting voting under section 5 of the 
        Voting Rights Act of 1965; and
            (3) legislative action is necessary to restore the prior 
        consistent and longstanding executive branch interpretation of 
        section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION OF PURPOSE TO DENY OR ABRIDGE.

    Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is amended by inserting 
``As used in this subsection, `purpose . . . of denying or abridging' 
is not limited to the purpose or intent to retrogress but can be any 
purpose or intent to discriminate.'' after ``procedure:'' and before 
``Provided,'' in the first sentence.
                                 <all>
```
§ 162.20 Flushing Bay near La Guardia Airport, Flushing, N.Y.; restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* An area in the main channel in Flushing Bay extending for a distance of 300 feet on either side of the extended center line of Runway No. 13-31 at La Guardia Airport.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) All vessels traversing the area shall pass directly through without unnecessary delay.
( 2 ) No vessels having a height of more than 35 feet with reference to the plane of mean high water shall enter or pass through the area whenever visibility is less than one mile.
[CGD 75-082, 42 FR 51759, Sept. 29, 1977, as amended by USCG-2011-0257, 76 FR 31838, June 2, 2011]