alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No.: 22-cr-60078-RAR-2

Petitioner,

v.

WILSON TIRADO-SILVA

Defendant.

______________________/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

LYDIA PITTAWAY, Esquire, of PITTAWAY LAW, PLLC, hereby files her Notice of

Appearance, through trial only in this cause, on behalf of Wilson Tirado-Silva.

Dated this 13th day of August 2022.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Lydia Pittaway____

Florida Bar No. 44790

Pittaway Law P.L.L.C.

200 S. Indian River Dr., Ste. 301

Fort Pierce, FL 34950

Phone: 772-494-1821

Fax: 407-674-2524

Lydia@PittawayLaw.us

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On August 13, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by

using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all parties of record.

/s/ Lydia Pittaway

Florida Bar No. 44790

Case 0:22-cr-60078-RAR Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/13/2022 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-cv-22987-ALTMAN/Reid

JESUS GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

PINCHO FACTORY #2, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

The parties have settled this case. See Notice of Settlement [ECF No. 24]. Accordingly, the 

Court hereby ORDERS and ADJUDGES as follows:

1. This case shall be administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties. The parties 

shall file a stipulation of dismissal by January 27, 2023.

2. If the parties fail to complete the expected settlement, any party may ask the Court to 

reopen the case.

3. All pending deadlines are TERMINATED, and any pending motions are DENIED AS 

MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on November 22, 2022.

 _________________________________

 ROY K. ALTMAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record

Case 1:22-cv-22987-RKA Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/23/2022 Page 1 of 1
*Department of Veteran's Affairs*

Office of Inspector General -- Audit

Review of Selected Aspects of theMedical Care Cost Recovery Program; 5R1-G01-121

September 29, 1995

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by USCG-2008-0179, 73 FR 35015, June 19, 2008.

#### § 159.105 Shock test.

The device, with liquid retention components, if any, filled with water to half of their volume, must be subjected to 1,000 vertical shocks that are ten times the force of gravity (10g) and have a duration of 20-25 milliseconds measured at the base of the half-sine shock envelope.
§ 401.44 Mooring in locks. ( a ) The primary means of securing vessels in the locks is by way of the Hands-Free Mooring (HFM) system. Vessels being moored by HFM must have a minimum of one well rested crew member on deck during the lockage to assist the Bridge team.
( b ) Single tugs, tug/barge combinations, and small vessels (less than 160m in overall length) that are not eligible to use HFM are to be processed without mooring lines at the Canadian Locks with the exception of upbound lockages at Locks 4, 5 and 6 in the Welland Canal.
( c ) Vessels requiring the use of mooring lines shall be processed as follows: ( 1 ) Mooring lines shall only be placed on mooring posts as directed by the officer in charge of the mooring operation.
( 2 ) No winch from which a mooring line runs shall be operated until the officer in charge of a mooring operation has signaled that the line has been placed on a mooring post.
( 3 ) Once the mooring lines are on the mooring posts, lines shall be kept slack until the “all clear” signal is given by the lock personnel. When casting off signal is received, mooring lines shall be kept slack until the “all clear” signal is given by the lock personnel.
( 4 ) Vessels being moored by “Hands Free Mooring” system (HFM) or passing through a lock without the use of mooring lines shall have a minimum of one well rested crew member on deck during the lockage to assist the Bridge team.
[89 FR 15961, Mar. 6, 2024]
§ 72.01-5 Local Notice to Mariners. ( a ) “Local Notice to Mariners” reports changes to and deficiencies in aids to navigation that are established or maintained and operated by or under the authority of the Coast Guard, and any other information pertaining to the waterways within each Coast Guard district that is of interest to the mariner.
( b ) “Local Notices to Mariners” are published weekly by each Coast Guard district or more often if there is a need to notify mariners of local waterway information. Local Notices to Mariners are available for viewing on the Coast Guard Navigation Center Web site at *http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=lnmMain .*
( c ) Any person may apply to the Coast Guard Navigation Center to receive automatic notices via email when new editions of the Local Notices to Mariners are available. Apply at *http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=listServerForm .*
[CGD 70-147R, 37 FR 10669, May 26, 1972, as amended by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24984, May 5, 2004; USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39170, July 1, 2013; USCG-2015-0433, 80 FR 44279, July 27, 2015]
§ 334.905 Pacific Ocean, offshore of Camp Pendleton, California; Fallbrook restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The waters of the Gulf of Santa Catalina, offshore of Camp Pendleton in the Pacific Ocean, San Diego County, California. The center of the restricted area is located at 33°18.6′ N. latitude, 117°32.0′ W. longitude, with a radius of 9,000 feet.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) No vessel or craft of any size shall lie-to or anchor in the restricted area at any time other than a vessel operated by or for the U.S. Coast Guard, local, State or Federal law enforcement agencies.
( 2 ) Loitering, dredging, dragging, anchoring, seining, fishing, and similar activities within the restricted area during vertical replenishment operations use is prohibited.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the U.S. Coast Guard, local, State, or Federal law enforcement agencies.
[58 FR 53427, Oct. 15, 1993]
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 36309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14620]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 111 / Thursday, June 8, 2000 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 36309]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2000-21 of June 2, 2000

                
Determination Under Subsection 402(d)(1) of the 
                Trade Act of 1974, as Amended: Continuation of Waiver 
                Authority for Vietnam

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                    Pursuant to subsection 402(d)(1) of the Trade Act 
                of 1974, as amended (the ``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 
                2432(d)(1), I determine that the further extension of 
                the waiver authority granted by subsection 402(c) of 
                the Act will substantially promote the objectives of 
                section 402 of the Act. I further determine that the 
                continuation of the waiver applicable to Vietnam will 
                substantially promote the objectives of section 402 of 
                the Act.
                    You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 2, 2000.

[FR Doc. 00-14620
Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-M
§ 209.315 Public access to navigation works. While the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the army for various navigation improvements usually strictly prohibit trespass on Government property, those regulations will not be construed as prohibiting access to navigation works of general public interest subject to the following criteria: ( a ) The public will not be permitted in areas where their presence would subject themselves or Government operating personnel to serious accident hazards.
( b ) The public will not be permitted in areas where their presence would interfere with any phases of navigation operations.
( c ) The public will be given access to all areas other than those specified under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, subject only to the normal legal requirements with respect to property and personal rights.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-23226-CIV-LENARD/LOUIS

VENUS CONCEPT USA, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

NICOLE JOHNSON and

FANATICAL SKIN INK, LLC,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court following the Court’s Order Granting in Part and 

Denying in Part Plaintiff Venus Concept USA, Inc.’s Motion for Default Final Judgment 

Against Defendants Nicole Johnson and Fanatical Skin Ink, LLC. Pursuant to Rules 55(b) 

and 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED AND 

ADJUDGED that:

1. FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff 

Venus Concept USA, Inc. and against Defendants Nicole Johnson and 

Fanatical Skin Ink, LLC;

2. Plaintiff Venus Concept USA, Inc. shall have and receive from Defendants

Nicole Johnson and Fanatical Skin Ink, LLC, jointly and severally, the 

amount of $134,926.80 (calculated as $129,168.80 in damages ($79,836.44 

principal amount plus $49,332.36 in prejudgment interest), $5,356 in 

Case 1:22-cv-23226-JAL Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/02/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

attorneys’ fees, and $402.00 in taxable costs), which shall bear postjudgment interest at the prevailing statutory rate until the judgment is 

satisfied, for which sum let execution issue; and

3. This case is now CLOSED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 2nd day of March, 

2023.

____________________________________

JOAN A. LENARD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:22-cv-23226-JAL Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/02/2023 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 21.01**

**MercadoLibre, Inc.**

**List of Subsidiaries**

**Parent company:**

**MercadoLibre, Inc.**

Delaware, USA 

Date of Incorporation: October 15, 1999 

**Subsidiaries:**

**MercadoLibre S.A. (Argentina)**

Date of Incorporation: July 29, 1999 

**MercadoLibreS.A. de C.V. (Mexico)**

Date of Incorporation: October 6, 1999 

**MercadoLivre.Com Atividades de Internet Ltda. (Brazil)**

Date of Incorporation: October 6, 1999 

**MercadoLibre Chile Ltda. (Chile)**

Date of Incorporation:January 20, 2000 

**MercadoLibre Colombia, S.A. (Colombia)**

Date of Incorporation: February 7, 2000 

**MercadoLibre Venezuela S.A. (Venezuela)**

Date of Incorporation: February 3, 2000 

**MercadoPagoRepresentações Ltda. (Brazil)**

Date of Incorporation: September 16, 1999 

Former name: Ibazar Com Ltda. 

**MercadoLibre ZonaAmerica S.A. (Uruguay)**

Date of Incorporation: March 23, 2004 

**MercadoLibre Ecuador S.A. (Ecuador)**

Date of Incorporation: July, 12, 2006 

**MercadoLibre Perú S.A. (Peru)**

Date of Incorporation: January 26, 2000 

Former name: Deremate.com del Peru SA 

**Hammer.com, LLC**

Delaware, USA 

Date of Incorporation: November 1, 2005 

**MercadoPago, LLC**

Delaware, USA 

Date of Incorporation: April 10, 2006 

**ListaPop, LLC**

Delaware, USA 

Date of Incorporation: April 20, 2007 

**Deremate.com de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)**

Date of Incorporation:November 9, 1999 

**Deremate.com de Uruguay S.A. (Uruguay)**

Date of Incorporation: June 10, 1999 

**Deremate.com de Venezuela S.A. (Venezuela)**

Date of Incorporation: February 17, 2000 

**Deremate.com de VenezuelaS.A. (Colombian Branch) (Colombia)**

Date of Incorporation: April 18, 2000 

**eBazar.com.br Ltda. (Brazil)**

Date of Incorporation: February 12, 1999 

**MercadoPago Colombia S.A. (Colombia)**

Date of Incorporation:October 31, 2006 

**MercadoPago S.A. (Chile)**

Date ofIncorporation: April 11, 2006 

**Servicios Administrativos y Comerciales, LLC (Delaware)**

Date of Incorporation: October 11, 2007 

**PSGAC Prestadora deServicios Gerenciales, Administrativos y Comerciales, S.A. de C.V (Mexico)**

Date of Incorporation: November 12, 2007 

**CMG Classified Media Group, Inc. (Panama)**

Date of Incorporation:March 6, 2003 

**Venecapital Group Inc. (Panama)**

Date of Incorporation: December 2, 2003 

**Grupo Veneclasificados C.A. (Venezuela)**

Date of Incorporation: March 11, 2003 

**Clasificados InternacionalesS.A. (Panama)**

Date of Incorporation: August 23, 2006 

**Colclasificados S.A. (Colombia)**

Date of Incorporation: October 17, 2007 

**Clasificados Florida LLC (Florida)**

Date of Incorporation: July 10, 2006
§ 401.64 Calling in. ( a ) Every vessel, intending to transit or in transit, shall report on the assigned frequency to the designated Seaway station when opposite any calling in point or checkpoint (indicated on the General Seaway Plan) and, when reporting, shall give the information indicated in Schedule III.
( b ) Changes in information provided under paragraph (a), including updated ETAs that vary from the ETAs provided under that paragraph by 30 minutes or more, shall be reported to the appropriate Seaway station.
( c ) A down bound vessel in St. Lambert Lock shall switch to channel 10 (156.5 MHz) for a traffic report from Quebec Vessel Management Center.
( d ) After obtaining the situation report referred to in paragraph (c) of this section, the downbound vessel shall return to guarding channel 14 (156.7 MHz) and remain on that channel until it is clear of St. Lambert Lock chamber.
( e ) When the downbound vessel has cleared the downstream end of the lower approach wall of St. Lambert Lock, the master of the vessel shall call “Seaway Beauharnois” and request permission to switch to channel 10 (156.5 MHz).
( f ) Seaway Beauharnois shall grant the permission requested pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section and advise the downbound vessel of any upbound traffic that may be cleared for Seaway entry but not yet at C.I.P. 2.
( g ) In the event of an expected meeting of vessels between the downstream end of the lower approach wall and C.I.P. 2, the downbound vessel shall remain on channel 14 (156.7 MHz) until the meeting has been completed.
( h ) After the meeting, the downbound vessel shall call “Seaway Beauharnois” before switching to channel 10 (156.5 MHz).
(68 Stat. 93-96, 33 U.S.C. 981-990, as amended and secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 13 of sec. 2 of Pub. L. 95-474, 92 Stat. 1471)
[39 FR 10900, Mar. 22, 1974, as amended at 43 FR 25818, June 15, 1978; 47 FR 51123, Nov. 12, 1982; 61 FR 19551, May 2, 1996; 82 FR 12420, Mar. 3, 2017]
# A-4A-B BC-Comp beds
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from ACCEL International
Corporation's September 30, 1999 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
such financial statments.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            25,075
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  26,301
<CASH>                                           2,198
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,858
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 55,016
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              5,826
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           947
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,858
<PREMIUMS>                                      17,492
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,667
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 208
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      21
<BENEFITS>                                      16,877
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,743
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            11,220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,452)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,452)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,452)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
79–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–156 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE BILL (H.R. 2346) MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2009, AND FOR 

OTHER PURPOSES 

JUNE 15, 2009.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 545] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 545, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of the conference report 

to accompany H.R. 2346, the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 

2009. The resolution waives all points of order against the conference report and against its consideration. The resolution provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. The 

resolution provides that the Chair may postpone further consideration of the conference report to a time designated by the Speaker. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the conference report includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring 

a three-day layover of conference reports and the accompanying 

joint explanatory statement). The conference report does not violate 

clauses 9 or 10 of rule XXI. Although the rule waives all points of 

order against the conference report, the Committee is not aware of 

any points of order. The waiver of all points of order is prophylactic. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION

CASE NO. 22-CV-81294-CANNON

DONALD J. TRUMP,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Lazaro P. Fields of the law firm of CONTINENTAL

PLLC, enters his appearance as co-counsel on behalf of the Plaintiff, President Donald J. 

Trump. All future correspondence, pleadings and other papers in this matter directed to the 

Plaintiff should be served on the undersigned counsel at 255 Alhambra Circle, Suite 640, 

Coral Gables, Florida 33134, and via e-mail at LFields@ContinentalPLLC.com. 

Dated: October 12, 2022

Respectfully Submitted, 

CONTINENTAL PLLC

255 Alhambra Circle

Suite 640

Coral Gables, Florida 33144

Telephone: 305-677-2707

By: /s/ Lazaro P. Fields

Lazaro P. Fields

Florida Bar No. 1004725

LFields@ContinentalPLLC.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff, 

President Donald J. Trump

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 142 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/12/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 12, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing 

document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the 

attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of 

Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those 

counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notice of Electronic 

Filing. 

By: /s/ Lazaro P. Fields

Lazaro P. Fields

Florida Bar No. 1004725

LFields@ContinentalPLLC.com

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff, 

President Donald J. Trump

Case 9:22-cv-81294-AMC Document 142 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/12/2022 Page 2 of 2
Cheshire

No. 7649

#### Garland & LaChance Construction Company, Inc. v. City of Keene

November 16, 1977

*Faulkner, Plaut, Hanna, Zimmerman & Freund,*of Keene *(Mr. George R. Hanna*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Wadleigh, Starr, Peters, Dunn & Kohls,*of Manchester *(Mr. Theodore Wadleigh*orally), for the defendant.

Per curiam.

This is an appeal by the defendant, the city of Keene, from a decision of the Superior Court *(Bois,*J.) ordering an abatement of the plaintiff’s real property taxes of $108,513.70 for the years 1970, 1971, 1973 and 1974. In a thorough report, the *921Master *(Earl J. Dearborn)*considered three methods for appraising the plaintiff’s property, a shopping center located in Keene. He found that the market approach, under which the value of a given piece of property is compared with similar property in the same area, was inadequate because there was only one other shopping center in the area. Similarly, the replacement cost method was found to be too speculative because a builder today would “eliminate and change construction to combat increased construction costs and would not replace a building today in the manner in which it was originally constructed.” The master relied on the capitalization of income approach as the best means of assessing value.

 Throughout the proceedings below, the defendant took only one exception that is argued here. It is to the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict. Defendant’s prior counsel did not except to the master’s report itself, nor did he submit requests for findings of fact or law. Such an exception raises no questions of law for this court other than those preserved by special exception during trial or on the face of the record itself. *Johnson v. Martignetti,*113 N.H. 608, 609, 312 A.2d 703, 704 (1973) (per curiam); *Gove v. Crosby,*100 N.H. 380, 381, 128 A.2d 205, 206 (1956); *Goddard v. Hazelton,*96 N.H. 231, 232, 73 A.2d 123, 124 (1950); *cf. Young v. Prendiville,*112 N.H. 190, 191—92, 291 A.2d 602, 603 (1972) (failure to except to master’s report or its acceptance not fatal because party raised issue in request for rulings of law' and issues covered in report). Defendant attempts to use this exception to argue that the master has made numerous mistakes. But if the evidence as a whole supports the master, the exception must be overruled. *Ciborowski v. Robinson,*116 N.H. 723, 366 A.2d 493 (1976) (per curiam); *Nixon v. Cooper,*97 N.H. 327, 87 A.2d 687 (1952). The master did have sufficient evidence to decide that the income approach would yield the best estimate of value and he had ample figures on which to base his computations. In using the income approach he violated no settled law in this state such that we would invoke any exception to our procedural rule. *See generally McPhee v. Colburn,*98 N.H. 406, 101 A.2d 458 (1953); *Eastman v. Waisman,*94 N.H. 253, 51 A.2d 151 (1947).

*Exceptions overruled.*

Bois, J., did not sit; Lampron, J., did not participate in the decision of this case.