alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER00-2624-000]

Take notice that on May 26, 2000, New York Independent System Operator, Inc., (NYISO), tendered for filing a request for an extension of Temporary Extraordinary Procedures for Correcting Market Design Flaws and Addressing Transitional Abnormalities.

The NYISO requests an effective date of May 17, 2000 and waiver of the Commission's notice requirements.

A copy of this filing was served upon all persons on the Commission's official service list in Docket No. ER00-1533-000, on those parties who have executed service agreements under the NYISO Open Access Transmission Tariff or under the New York Independent System Operator Market Administration and Control Area Services Tariff and on the electric utility regulatory agencies in New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions and protests should be filed on or before June 16, 2000. Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/​online/​rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14122  Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
AGENDA

RAISE Act Family Caregiving Advisory Council

July 16, 2020

12:30–4:30 pm, Eastern Time

*Times Subject to Change

12:30–12:40 Welcome and Roll Call 

Greg Link

Director, Office of Supportive and Caregiver Services

Administration for Community Living

12:40–12:50 Open and Convening Remarks

Lance Robertson

Administrator and Assistant Secretary for Aging

Administration for Community Living

12:50–1:00 Agenda Overview and Updates

Greg Link

Director, Office of Supportive and Caregiver Services

Administration for Community Living

1:00–1:45 Medicare and Family Caregivers

Judith A. Stein, JD

Executive Director

Center for Medicare Advocacy

David Lipschutz, JD

Associate Director

Center for Medicare Advocacy 

1:45–2:30 Medicaid and State Programs

Bea-Alise Rector, MPA

Director

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services

2:30–2:45 Short Break

2:45–3:30 Listening Sessions (Feedback)

Pamela Nadash, PhD

Associate Professor, Department of Gerontology

University of Massachusetts

Eileen Tell

Principal and Owner

ET Consulting, LLC

3:30–4:15 Review/Discussion: Initial Report to Congress Outline

Sarah Markel

Aging Services Program Specialist

Office of Supportive and Caregiver Services

Administration for Community Living

4:15 –4:30 Wrap Up & Next Steps.

Greg Link

Director, Office of Supportive and Caregiver Services

Administration for Community Living

A complete list of council members can be found at the RAISE web page
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 113 (Monday, June 12, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36807-36808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 258

[FRL-6710-4]


State of West Virginia: Final Approval of State Municipal Solid 
Waste Management Permit Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to grant 
complete program approval for West Virginia's Municipal Solid Waste 
Permit Program. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this 
Federal Register, EPA is approving the remaining elements of the 
State's program as an immediate final rule without prior proposal 
because EPA views this action as noncontroversial and anticipates no 
adverse comments. The Agency has explained the reasons for this program 
approval in the preamble to the immediate final rule. If EPA does not 
receive adverse written comments, the immediate final rule will become 
effective and the Agency will not take further action on this proposal. 
If EPA receives adverse written comments, EPA will withdraw the 
immediate final rule, and it will not take effect. EPA will then 
address public comments in a later final rule based on this proposal. 
EPA may not provide further opportunity for comment. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action must do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 12, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to the following address where the 
full West Virginia program approval application is on file and may be 
reviewed: EPA Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103-
2029, or alternatively at West Virginia Division of Environmental 
Protection (WVDEP), 1356 Hansford Street, Charleston, WV 25301-1401.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S. EPA Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029, Attn: Mr. Michael C. Giuranna, 
mailcode 3WC21, telephone (215) 814-3298. The contact for the State of 
West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection is Mr. Larry Atha, 
1356 Hansford Street, Charleston, West Virginia 25301-1401, telephone 
(304) 558-6350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
immediate final rule published in the

[[Page 36808]]

``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register.

    Authority: This notice is issued under the authority of section 
2002, 4005 and 4010(c) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended, 
42 U.S.C. 6912, 6945 and 6949(a).

Bradley M. Campbell,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 00-14165 Filed 6-9-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

RELM Wireless Corporation/s/ David P. StoreyDavid P. StoreyPresident and Chief Executive Officer




August 13, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30604

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEONARD LYLE FONTENOT

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:04-CR-20059-7

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leonard Lyle Fontenot was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess

cocaine base, methylenedioxy amphetamine (ecstasy), and marijuana with intent

to distribute (Count One), and one count of possession of cocaine base with intent

to distribute (Count Five). He appeals the mandatory life sentence imposed as

to Count One on the basis that it violated his Sixth Amendment right to have a

jury determine the facts of his prior drug convictions. As Fontenot concedes, his

argument is foreclosed. See Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000);

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 22, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-30604

2

United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007), cert.

denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,280,099
<SECURITIES>                                82,746,070
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,783,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (195,118)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            94,024,925
<PP&E>                                      18,196,679
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,636,347)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,964,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       46,679,246
<BONDS>                                     29,598,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,799,402
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,886,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               113,964,550
<SALES>                                      6,151,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,664,456
<CGS>                                        4,684,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,684,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,263,964
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             798,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                917,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                   369,868
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            547,359
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   547,359
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
[Civ. No. 5839.

Third Appellate District.

June 23, 1937.]

#### STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION AND BLASS JUROVICH, Respondents.

Carroll S. Bucher and Reynald J. Bianchi for Petitioner.

Everett A. Corten for Respondents.

THOMPSON, J.

—This is a petition on the part of the State Compensation Insurance Fund, against which an award of $9.50 per week was apportioned and rendered, in favor of the respondent, Blass Jurovich, on account of disability arising as a result of silicosis incurred in the course of his employment in certain mines.  This cause involves the identical issues which were determined by this court in the opinion which was this day filed in the proceeding entitled *Argonaut Mining Company, Ltd.,*v. *Industrial Accident Commission (ante,*p. 492 [70 Pac. (2d) 216]).

Upon the authority of the last-mentioned proceeding, the order and the award against this petitioner are affirmed.

Plummer, J., and Pullen, P. J., concurred.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of SECURED FINANCIAL NETWORK, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael E. Fasci, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 13, 2010

/s/ Michael E. FasciMichael E. FasciChief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 3 1 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk August 3 1 , 2018

156430( 62 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 156430

v COA: 331602

Wayne CC: 13

- 000575

- FC

KELLI MARIE WORTH

- McBRIDE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice , the motion to extend the time for filing the plaintiff

appellee ’s supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as

timely filed if submitted on or before September 27 , 2018

.
§ 161.4 Requirement to carry the rules. Each VTS User shall carry on board and maintain for ready reference a copy of these rules. Note 1 to § 161.4 :
These rules are contained in the applicable U.S. Coast Pilot, the VTS User's Manual which may be obtained by contacting the appropriate VTS or downloaded from the Coast Guard Navigation Center website (*https://www.navcen.uscg.gov*).
[CGD 90-020, 59 FR 36324, July 15, 1994, as amended by USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30880, June 28, 2019]
Hillsborough

No. 78-176

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Dale Murchaison

December 29, 1978

*Thomas D. Rath,*attorney general *(Peter W. Mosseau*orally), for the State.

*Sullivan, Gregg & Horton,*of Nashua *(James L. Sullivan, Jr.,*orally), for the defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendant was convicted of theft by deception. His exceptions were transferred by *King,*J.

*917Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions to dismiss and to set aside the verdict on the basis that the evidence did not support a finding that he intended to deprive the owner of the property.

The evidence shows that defendant obtained a loan from Household Finance Corporation of New Hampshire by posing as one Marinus D. Blomme. The company obtained a credit report on Blomme and made the loan. Defendant signed the name Marinus Blomme to the note, and the check which defendant cashed was made out in that name. One of the elements of theft by deception is that the defendant intend to deprive the owner of the property. RSA 637:4. Defendant testified that he intended to repay the loan according to schedule. The loan has not been repaid.

 In passing on the sufficiency of the evidence, we must construe the evidence most favorably to the State. *State v. Dupuy,*118 N.H. 848, 395 A.2d 851 (1978). In our opinion the intent to deprive the owner of the property could be found from the fact that defendant obtained it by deception and has not paid it back.

Defendant also contends that it was error for the trial court to deny his pretrial motion to exclude evidence of his prior conviction in 1969 for forgery. In his motion defendant asserted that he intended to take the stand in his own defense, but the defendant waived trial by jury and the prior conviction was not in fact introduced at the trial. The question is therefore moot.

*Exceptions overruled.*
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4975

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal 
 Square, Newark, New Jersey, as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg Post Office 
                           and Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4975

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal 
 Square, Newark, New Jersey, as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg Post Office 
                           and Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The post office and courthouse located at 2 Federal Square, Newark, 
New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg 
Post Office and Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the post office and courthouse referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Frank R. 
Lautenberg Post Office and Courthouse.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 1:22-cr-20389-RKA Document 231 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cr-20389-RKA Document 231 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
Order entered October 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00837-CR

MICHAEL WAYNE LEWIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-50889-X

ORDER

On May 28, 2013, we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, 

including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. 

However, the detailed itemization of costs included in the supplemental record does not comply 

with the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 103.001, 

103.006 (West 2006). Accordingly, on September 27, 2013, we ordered the Dallas County 

District Clerk to file, within seven days of that order a second supplemental clerk’s record that 

contains a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case that complies with articles 

103.001 and 103.006 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See id. art. 103.001 (“A cost is 

not payable by the person charged with the cost until a written bill is produced or is ready to be 
produced, containing the items of cost, signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer 

who is entitled to receive payment for the cost.”) (emphasis added); art. 103.006 (“If a criminal 

action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs 

stating the costs that have accrued and send the bill of cost to the court to which the action or 

proceeding is . . . appealed.”) (emphasis added).

On October 8, 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk filed a second supplemental clerk’s 

record. However, that second supplemental clerk’s record does not contain a detailed 

itemization of the costs assessed in this case that complies with articles 103.001 and 103.006 of 

the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 

 Accordingly, we ORDER Gary Fitzsimmons, the Dallas County District Clerk, to file

within SEVEN DAYS of the date of this order a supplemental clerk’s record signed by the 

officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost.”) 

(emphasis added); art. 103.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an officer of 

the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and send the bill 

of cost to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed.”) (emphasis added) and

that contains a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case that complies with articles 

103.001 and 103.006 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
§ 402.5 New Business Incentive Program. ( a ) To be eligible for the rebate applicable under the New Business Incentive Program, a carrier must submit an application to the Manager for the proposed commodity/origin/destination combination to be approved and accepted under the rules of the New Business Incentive Program promulgated and administered from time to time by the Manager.
( b ) Containerized cargo, whatever the origin or destination, moved by a vessel in the Seaway at any time in the current navigation season qualifies as New Business.
( c ) A commodity/origin/destination combination that qualifies as New Business on or before the 30th day of September in any navigation season continues to qualify as New Business in the two consecutive navigation seasons immediately following the then current navigation season.
( d ) A commodity/origin/destination combination that qualifies as New Business after the 30th day of September in any navigation season continues to qualify as New Business in the three consecutive navigation seasons immediately following the then current navigation season.
[74 FR 10679, Mar. 12, 2009, as amended at 78 FR 19106, Mar. 29, 2013; 80 FR 5047, Jan. 30, 2015]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4944

To amend the Small Business Act to permit the sale of guaranteed loans

made for export purposes before the loans have been fully disbursed

to borrowers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 25, 2000

Mr. MANZULLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To amend the Small Business Act to permit the sale of

guaranteed loans made for export purposes before the

loans have been fully disbursed to borrowers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Export Working Cap5 ital Loan Improvement Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. SALE OF GUARANTEED LOANS MADE FOR EXPORT

7 PURPOSES.

8 Section 5(f)(1)(C) of the Small Business Act (15

9 U.S.C. 634(f)(1)(C)) is amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 4944 IH

1 ‘‘(C) each loan, except each loan made under

2 section 7(a)(14), shall have been disbursed to the

3 borrower prior to any sale.’’.

Æ