alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 7, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36129-36130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-176-020]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Proposed 
Change in FERC Gas Tariff

June 1, 2000.
    Take notice that on May 26, 2000, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing First Revised Sheet No. 26J to be 
a part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised

[[Page 36130]]

Volume No. 1, to be effective April 25, 2000.
    On April 25, 2000, Natural filed Original sheet No. 26J at Docket 
No. RP99-176-018 to implement a negotiated rate formula transaction 
under Rate Schedule ITS with the Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company. 
Original Sheet No. 26J was accepted by letter order dated May 19, 2000, 
to become effective April 25, 2000.
    Subsequently to Natural's initial filing on April 25, 2000, it was 
discovered that the executed negotiated rate agreement inadvertently 
omitted all storage and pooling points in Natural's Iowa Illinois Gulf 
Receipt Zone from among the qualified delivery points. The negotiated 
rate agreement was amended to remedy this omission. Therefore, Natural 
is now submitting First Revised Sheet No. 26J reflecting the revised 
footnote six (6) to supersede Original Sheet No. 26J previously 
submitted on April 25, 2000.
    Natural requests waiver of the Commission's Regulations, including 
the 30-day notice requirement of Section 154.207, to the extent 
necessary to permit First Revised Sheet No. 26J to become effective 
April 25, 2000, which coincides with the effective date of the 
amendment to the underlying negotiated rate agreement.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Natural's customers, interested state commissions and all parties set 
out on the Commission's official service list in Docket No. RP99-176.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with sections 385.215 or 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room. This filing may be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).

David P. Boergers,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 00-14231 Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
2022 Annual Conference Agenda

Time Session

9:00am – 9:05am Welcome & Opening Remarks

9:05am – 10:05am

Plenary 1: LGBTQ+ Cultural Competency: Pronouns and Gendered Language 

• Lucas Johansen, NOAA Fisheries Office of Science & Technology, NOAA Pride 

Executive Committee Member

10:05am – 10:15am Morning Break

10:15am – 11:15am

Plenary 2: Empowering Ombuds to Help Solve the Problem of Abrasive Leadership

• Laura Crawshaw, Executive Insight Development Group

11:15am – 11:35pm COFO Mentoring Committee

11:35am – 11:40pm

Ombuds Organization Update: International Ombuds Association (IOA)

• Ellen Miller, IOA Executive Director

11:40am – 11:50pm

Blip 1: Conflict Resolution for Holy Beings by Joy Harjo

• Elisa Enriquez, Senior Associate Ombuds, Los Alamos National Laboratory

11:50pm – 12:50pm Lunch

12:50pm – 1:05pm

Ombuds Game

• Erica Katherine, Ombudsman, FDA Office of Regulatory Affairs

1:05pm – 2:05pm

Plenary 3: Dancing to the Edge of Neutrality

• Linda Brothers, Senior Associate Ombudsman, National Institutes of Health

• Jenn Mahony, Ombuds Office Director, Boston Children’s Hospital

• Katie Manderson, ADR Director, Department of Veterans Affairs

2:05pm – 2:15pm Afternoon Break

2:15pm – 2:20pm Ombuds Organization Update: ABA Dispute Resolution Section Ombuds Committee

• Liz Hill, Associate Director, Ombuds Office, University of Colorado-Boulder

2:20pm – 3:35pm

Plenary 4: Developing Deeper Organizational Partnerships and Support

• Brian Bloch, Ombuds, Department of the Interior

• Mary Chavez Rudolph, Ombuds, Department of the Interior

• Will Hall, Director, Office of Collaborative Action & Dispute Resolution,

Department of the Interior

• Paula Hoag, Asbestos and Small Business Ombudsman, EPA

• Vik Kapoor, Ombuds, Department of the Interior

• Tahirih Varner, Ombuds, Department of the Interior

3:35pm – 3:40pm

Ombuds Organization Update: United States Ombudsman Association (USOA)

• Robin Matsunaga, USOA President & Ombudsman, State of Hawaii

3:40pm – 4:25pm

Plenary 5: Many Open Doors - Serving Multiple Populations as an Ombuds

• David Schwartz, Ombuds, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

4:25 – 4:50pm COFO Executive Committee

4:50pm – 5:00pm Blip 2: It’s Ombuds Day

• Belinda Robinson, Associate Ombudsman, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 148.715 How is an environmental review conducted? The environmental review of a proposed deepwater port and reasonable alternatives consists of Federal, tribal, State, and public review of the following two parts: ( a ) An evaluation of the proposal's completeness of environmental information and quality of assessment, probable environmental impacts, and identification of procedures or technology that might mitigate probable adverse environmental impacts through avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing, eliminating, or compensating for those impacts; and
( b ) An evaluation of the effort made under the proposal to mitigate its probable environmental impacts. This evaluation will assess the applicant's consideration of the criteria in §§ 148.720 through 148.740 of this subpart.
§ 328.4 Limits of jurisdiction. ( a ) *Territorial Seas.* The limit of jurisdiction in the territorial seas is measured from the baseline in a seaward direction a distance of three nautical miles. (See 33 CFR 329.12)
( b ) *Tidal waters of the United States.* The landward limits of jurisdiction in tidal waters: ( 1 ) Extends to the high tide line, or
( 2 ) When adjacent non-tidal waters of the United States are present, the jurisdiction extends to the limits identified in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Non-tidal waters of the United States.* The limits of jurisdiction in non-tidal waters: ( 1 ) In the absence of adjacent wetlands, the jurisdiction extends to the ordinary high water mark, or
( 2 ) When adjacent wetlands are present, the jurisdiction extends beyond the ordinary high water mark to the limit of the adjacent wetlands.
( 3 ) When the water of the United States consists only of wetlands the jurisdiction extends to the limit of the wetland.
Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint

(ACF) River Basin Stakeholder

Collaborative Process

Fall 2008-2009

Location: Alabama, Florida, and Georgia

Background

The Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin

(ACF) spans over 19,000 square miles, and is a source

of fresh water for Alabama, Florida, and Georgia. The

ACF is managed for a variety of purposes, including

navigation, power, flood control, and recreation, and is

an economic, natural and cultural resource for the

diverse stakeholders throughout the basin. Water use

and allocation in the basin has been in dispute and

litigation for more than 20 years.

In July 2008, several interested parties and individuals

approached the U.S. Institute for Environmental

Conflict Resolution (U.S. Institute) for advice in

convening a balanced and representative ACF

stakeholder group to address water and environmental

management issues within the basin, with an emphasis

on resolving water allocation disputes between the

states of Alabama, Florida, and Georgia.

In response to this request, the U.S. Institute

conducted a situation assessment, finding that a

stakeholder forum was generally supported and could

have a positive impact on stakeholder relationships

and water management in the basin. With the

assistance of the U.S. Institute, a steering committee

formed and developed the structural underpinnings

and support for a stakeholder group. The group was

incorporated as the ACF Stakeholders, Inc. (ACFS) in

the fall of 2009.

By its first meeting in December, 2009, the ACFS

included more than 95 member organizations, with a

56-member Governing Board. The U.S. Institute

organized and facilitated the inaugural meeting, and

more meetings are planned in the future.

Results and Accomplishments

The ACFS is a grassroots, stakeholder-driven

effort with a diverse and balanced group of

decision makers and stakeholders. The group

practices collaboration in a number of ways,

including,

 The ACF Steering Committee collaboratively

developed the ACFS Charter and By-Laws

 The ACFS organizes by river sub-basin rather

than by state

 The ACFS Governing Board operates by

consensus on substantive decisions

In their words

In the words of one of the participating ACF

Stakeholders:

“All could be improved if this process is successful.

We are only now just starting. Without this

process we would be stuck in litigation. The

opportunities are great...”

Credits

U.S. Institute Project Lead

Brian Manwaring, Program Manager

Water Resources Program

manwaring@ecr.gov

(520) 901 8529

website: www.ecr.gov

Contracted Assessment Partner

Steve Smutko, North Carolina State University
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Statements in Support of ADR","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JUlTs8hCPj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cr-day\/\">Statements in Support of ADR<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cr-day\/embed\/#?secret=JUlTs8hCPj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Statements in Support of ADR” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"JUlTs8hCPj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Vertical Computer System, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008  as filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:April
      15, 2008
              By:
              /s/ David
      BraunName: David
      BraunTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided by Vertical Computer
Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 162.125 Sturgeon Bay and the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal, Wisc. ( a ) In the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal: ( 1 ) No vessel may exceed 5 miles per hour.
( 2 ) No vessel greater than 150 feet in length (including tug and tow combinations) may come about.
( 3 ) No vessel 65 feet or greater in length (including tug and tow combinations) may either: ( i ) Enter or pass through the canal two or more abreast; or
( ii ) Overtake another vessel.
( 4 ) No vessel may anchor or moor unless given permission to do so by the Captain of the Port.
( 5 ) Each vessel must keep to the center, except when meeting or overtaking another vessel.
( b ) In Sturgeon Bay and the Sturgeon Bay Ship Canal: ( 1 ) Each laden vessel under tow must be towed with at least two towlines. Each towline must be shortened to the extent necessary to provide maximum control of the tow.
( 2 ) Each unladen vessel may be towed with one towline.
( 3 ) No towline may exceed 100 feet in length.
( 4 ) No vessel may tow another vessel alongside.
( 5 ) No vessel may tow a raft greater than 50 feet in width.
Note:
The Corps of Engineers also has regulations dealing with these areas in 33 CFR Part 207.
[CGD 79-151, 46 FR 7960, Jan. 26, 1981]
#### § 401.61 Assigned frequencies.

The Seaway stations operate on the following assigned VHF frequencies:

156.8 MHz—(channel 16)—Distress and Calling.

156.7 MHz—(channel 14)—Working (Canadian stations in Sector 1 and the Welland Canal).

156.65 MHz—(channel 13)—Working (U.S. station in Lake Ontario).

156.6 MHz—(channel12)—Working (U.S. station in Lake Ontario).

156.6 MHz—(channel 12)—Working (U.S. stations in Sector 2 of the River); and

156.55 MHz—(channel 11)—Working (Canadian stations in Sector 3, Lake Ontario and Lake Erie).

[80 FR 4500, Jan. 28, 2015]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"The Advantages and Disadvantages to Agency-level Protests","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wSNtayRlNq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/09-adalp\/\">The Advantages and Disadvantages to Agency-level Protests<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/09-adalp\/embed\/#?secret=wSNtayRlNq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Advantages and Disadvantages to Agency-level Protests” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"wSNtayRlNq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we, the undersigned, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our individual knowledge and belief, that:

 

| (1)    | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Southern Company. |

 

 

|   | /s/David M. Ratcliffe

David M. Ratcliffe

Chairman, President and

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/W. Paul Bowers

W. Paul Bowers

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

                     |

 

 

Date:  May 7, 2009
§ 384.9 How does the Corps of Engineers receive and respond to comments? ( a ) The responsible Corps official follows the procedures in § 384.10 if: ( 1 ) A state office or official is designated to act as a single point of contact between a state process and all federal agencies, and
( 2 ) That office or official transmits a state process recommendation for a program selected under § 384.6.
( b ) ( 1 ) The single point of contact is not obligated to transmit comments from state, areawide, regional or local officials and entities where there is no state process recommendation.
( 2 ) If a state process recommendation is transmitted by a single point of contact, all comments from state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities that differ from it must also be transmitted.
( c ) If a state has not established a process, or is unable to submit a state process recommendation, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments to the responsible Corps official.
( d ) If a program or activity is not selected for a state process, state, areawide, regional and local officials and entities may submit comments to the responsible Corps official. In addition, if a state process recommendation for a nonselected program or activity is transmitted to the responsible Corps official by the single point of contact, such official follows the procedures of § 384.10 of this part.
( e ) The responsible Corps official considers comments which do not constitute a state process recommendation submitted under these regulations and for which such official is not required to apply the procedures of § 384.10 of this part, when such comments are provided by a single point of contact or directly to such official by a commenting party.
EXHIBIT
32.1
   STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc. (the
"Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
  * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  *
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/ Thomas
Kidrin
 Thomas
Kidrin
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 Date: May
20, 2009
 
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Warren D. Edwards, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affiliated
Computer Services, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the second quarter of
fiscal year 2005 ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: February 8, 2005
    /s/ Warren D. EdwardsWarren D. Edwards,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.