alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Vulnerability Disclosure Policy","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wATXqxMq7h\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/vulnerability-disclosure-policy\/\">Vulnerability Disclosure Policy<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/vulnerability-disclosure-policy\/embed\/#?secret=wATXqxMq7h\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Vulnerability Disclosure Policy” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"wATXqxMq7h\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
§ 20.706 Witnesses. ( a ) Each witness shall testify under oath or affirmation.
( b ) If a witness fails or refuses to answer any question the ALJ finds proper, the failure or refusal constitutes grounds for the ALJ to strike all or part of the testimony given by the witness or to take any other measure he or she deems appropriate.
Answers: Fish, Kids, Seal, Plant

EPA 823-F-08-002 l May 2008
In the kitchen Playing outside

To clean Getting ready for bed

For more fun activities, visit 

www.epa.gov/waterscience/KidsStuff Remember to recycle this paper!
Exhibit 24(b)



August 9, 1999


W. L. Westbrook and Wayne Boston


Dear Sirs:

         Georgia Power Company proposes to file or join in the filing of
statements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission with respect to the filing of its quarterly reports on Form
10-Q during 1999.

         Georgia Power Company and the undersigned director and officers of said
Company, individually as a director and/or as an officer of the Company, hereby
make, constitute and appoint each of you our true and lawful Attorney for each
of us and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the foregoing
said quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and any appropriate amendment or amendments
thereto and any necessary exhibits.


                                    Yours very truly,

                                    GEORGIA POWER COMPANY



                                    By  /s/  David M. Ratcliffe
                                          David M. Ratcliffe
                                       President and Chief Executive
                                                Officer


<PAGE>


                                      - 2 -


/s/  David M. Ratcliffe                           /s/  Thomas A. Fanning
------------------------------                    ------------------------------
         David M. Ratcliffe                                 Thomas A. Fanning
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2000 Page 1 of 4
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2000 Page 2 of 4
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2000 Page 3 of 4
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2000 Page 4 of 4
From: Wagley, Subid Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:56 AM Subject: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Residential Refrigerators, Refrigerators

- Freezers,
and Freezers

Good Morning!

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is announcing the issuance of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) regarding the amended energy conservation standards for Residential Refrigerators, Refrigerators -Freezers, and Freezers. DOE will hold a public meeting on Thursday, October 14, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., at the U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 8E-089, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. DOE must receive requests to speak at the public meeting before 4 p.m., Thursday, September 30, 2010. Additionally, DOE plans to conduct the public meeting via webinar. To participate via webinar, DOE must be notified by no later than Thursday, October 7, 2010. DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) before and after the public meeting, but no later than Friday, November 26, 2010. Please follow the link
below for details.

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/refrigerators_freezers.ht
ml

Thank you.

_______________________________________ Subid Wagley Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy • U.S. Department of Energy

+1 -202-287- 1414 (desk)
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 3 NASS, USDA

Contents

Page
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 5 NASS, USDA


Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 8 NASS, USDA

Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 11 NASS, USDA

Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 13 NASS, USDA
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 14 NASS, USDA

Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 17 NASS, USDA

Fruits and Nuts Production, United States, 1997-99

(Domestic Units) 1

Crop Unit

Production

1997 1998 1999

1,000 1,000 1,000

Citrus 2

 Grapefruit

 K-Early Citrus (FL)

 Lemons

 Oranges

 Tangelos (FL)

 Tangerines

 Temples (FL)



Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 21 NASS, USDA

Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 24 NASS, USDA

hindered by dry soils in many areas of the Southeast, especially Georgia which received no significant

rainfall, while eastern and southern Texas received timely showers that boosted crop development. Dry

weather aided planting and seasonable temperatures promoted crop development in the central High Plains,

while wet conditions lingered in parts of the northern Great Plains. In the Pacific Northwest, drought
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 25 NASS, USDA

Forecasted head counts from the Objective Yield surveys in the six Hard Red Winter States (Colorado,

Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas) are similar to last year, but with low average weights

forecast. Colorado’s crop is in mostly good or better condition; hail losses have been normal. The May 16
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 26 NASS, USDA

end. Caretakers have been very active with post bloom nutritional spraying and cutting cover crops. 

Abandoned groves and dead trees are being pushed out and burned. Growers are resetting older groves that

have skips and vacancies.

Texas Citrus:
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board
Crop Production Agricultural Statistics Board

June 1999 28 NASS, USDA

Sweet Potatoes:


The next "Crop Production" report will be released at 8:30 a.m. ET on July 12, 1999.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on the basis

of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital

or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should

contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 22-3273-MJ-DAMIAN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

AARON THOMAS MITCHELL,

Defendant.

________________________________/

DEFENDANT=S INVOCATION OF

RIGHTS TO SILENCE AND COUNSEL

The defendant named above does hereby invoke his or her rights to 

remain silent and to counsel with respect to any and all questioning or 

interrogation, regardless of the subject matter, including, but not 

limited to: matters that may bear on or relate to arrest, searches and 

seizures, bail, pretrial release or detention, evidence at trial, guilt or 

innocence, forfeitures; or that may be relevant to sentencing, enhanced 

punishments, factors applicable under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, 

restitution, immigration status or consequences resulting from arrest or 

conviction; appeals or other post-trial proceedings.

The Defendant requests that the United States Attorney ensure 

that this invocation of rights is honored, by forwarding a copy of it to all 

law enforcement agents, government officials, or employees associated 

Case 1:22-mj-03273-MD Document 2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

with the investigation of any matters relating to the defendant. Any 

contact with the Defendant must be made through the defendant=s 

lawyer, undersigned counsel.

Respectfully Submitted,

MICHAEL CARUSO

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

BY: s/Ansdrew S. Jacobs

Andrew S. Jacobs

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Florida Bar No. A5502687

150 W. Flagler Street, Suite 1700

Miami, Florida 33130-1556

(305) 530-7000/(305) 536-4559, Fax

E-Mail: andrew_jacobs@fd.org

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY certify that on July 28, 2022, I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also 

certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all 

counsel of record via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those 

counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically 

Notices of Electronic Filing.

s/ Andrew S. Jacobs 

Andrew S. Jacobs 

Case 1:22-mj-03273-MD Document 2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2022 Page 2 of 2
One Solution Group LLC

ADP Payroll

Non-ADP 

Payroll

Total 

Payroll

Average 

Monthly 

Payroll ADP Payroll

Non-ADP 

Payroll

Total 

Payroll

Average 

Monthly 

Payroll ADP Payroll

Non-ADP 

Payroll

Total 

Payroll

Average 

Monthly 

Payroll

Joff Philossaint $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,147 $0 $5,147 $429 1, 2, 5

Leonardo Lucas $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,573 $300 $2,873 $239 1, 2, 5

Worlf Philossaint $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $2,000 $167 3

Ange Martial $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $790 $790 $66 3

Stelle Martial $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 4

Ferlinda Philossaint $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $500 $42 4

Cash Withdrawal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,303 $5,303 $1,073 $0 $18,688 $18,688 $1,557 5

Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,303 $5,303 $1,073 $7,720 $22,278 $29,998 $2,500

Period / Year

PPP 

Application

Bank 

Records Difference

Percent 

Difference

EIDL 

Application

PPP 

Application

State / ADP 

/ Bank 

Records

2019 $8,333 $0 -$8,333 4 9 1

1/1/2020 - 5/29/2020 $8,333 $1,073 -$7,260 4 9 1

2020 $8,333 $2,500 -$5,833 233%

Note Source

1 ADP

2 Florida Department of Revenue

3 Paid Checks

4 No Records

5 Bank Records

Reported vs Potential Average Payroll

Reported vs Potential No of 

Employees

Potential Payroll

Potential Employee Note

2019 1/1/2020 - 5/29/2020 2020

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 204-25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  NASA IDIQ Ombuds

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/NASA IDIQ Ombuds NASA IDIQ OmbudsADR2022-02-18T08:57:36-05:00
			
			NASA IDIQ OmbudsThe NASA FAR Supplement includes coverage for the standing “Ombudsman” program for all centers:
**1852.215-84 Ombudsman.**
As prescribed in 1815.7003, insert the following clause:
**OMBUDSMAN****(NOVEMBER 2011)**
(a)****An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and facilitate the resolution of concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and contractors during the preaward and postaward phases of this acquisition. When requested, the ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The existence of the ombudsman is not to diminish the authority of the contracting officer, the Source Evaluation Board, or the selection official. Further, the ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals, the source selection process, or the adjudication of formal contract disputes. Therefore, before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the contracting officer for resolution.
(b) If resolution cannot be made by the contracting officer, interested parties may contact the installation ombudsman, whose name, address, telephone number, facsimile number, and e-mail address may be found at: http://prod.nais.nasa.gov/pub/pub_library/Omb.html. Concerns, issues, disagreements, and recommendations which cannot be resolved at the installation may be referred to the Agency ombudsman identified at the above URL. Please do not contact the ombudsman to request copies of the solicitation, verify offer due date, or clarify technical requirements. Such inquiries shall be directed to the Contracting Officer or as specified elsewhere in this document. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
Editorial Note on Part 67
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 67 appear by USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004.

§ 67.30-5 Obstruction lights. ( a ) The obstruction lights shall be white or red lights as prescribed in Subpart 67.05 of this part and shall be of sufficient candlepower as to be visible at a distance of at least one nautical mile 90 percent of the nights of the year. The lights shall be displayed at such height, above mean high water, as shall be prescribed by the District Commander. When the District Commander shall authorize red lights to mark a Class “C” structure, the color thereof shall conform to the shade of red prescribed in Military Specification Mil-C-25050 (ASG), Type 1, Grade D. A copy of the specification may be obtained from the Commanding Officer, Document Automation and Production Service, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4, Section D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5091.
( b ) When Class “C” structures are erected in close proximity to each other, or are connected in such a manner as to prevent marine traffic from passing freely through the field, obstruction lights may be authorized to mark the perimeter structures only, when in the judgment of the District Commander the group of structures which are equipped with obstruction lights are so arranged that the particular structures are protected to the degree required by this part, and are not a hazard to navigation.
( c ) Unless advised to the contrary by the District Commander, obstruction lights shall be required on Class “C” structures erected in depths of water greater than 3 feet at mean low water.
( d ) In cases where, although not required, an applicant desires to establish and operate obstruction lights, a permit therefor shall be granted, at the discretion of the District Commander: *Provided,* That the lights meet the requirements set forth in this part.
[CGFR 58-34, 23 FR 7701, Oct. 4, 1958, as amended by CGFR 68-95, 33 FR 15285, Oct. 15, 1968; USCG-2001-10714, 69 FR 24983, 24984, May 5, 2004]
EXHIBIT


31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I, George
R. Lefevre, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MotivNation Inc. (the "Company")
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008.





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the quarterly report;
and





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which the quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in the quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
the quarterly report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in the quarterly report any change in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial
reporting.

















Dated:  May
20,
2008                                                                           By:  /s/ George R.
Lefevre


George R. Lefevre CEO
#### § 166.400 Areas along the coast of Alaska.

(a) *Purpose.* Fairways, as described in this section, are established to control the erection of structures therein to provide safe vessel routes along the coast of Alaska.

(b) *Designated Areas* —

(1) *Prince William Sound Safety Fairway. *

(i) *Hinchinbrook Entrance Safety Fairway.* The area enclosed by rhumb lines joining points at:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 59°59′00′′ N | 145°27′24′′ W |
| 60°13′18′′ N | 146°38′06′′ W |
| 60°11′24′′ N | 146°47′00′′ W |
| 59°55′00′′ N | 145°42′00′′ W |

(ii) *Gulf to Hinchinbrook Safety Fairway* (recommended for inbound vessel traffic). The area enclosed by rhumb lines joining points at:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 59°15′42′′ N | 144°02′07′′ W |
| 59°59′00′′ N | 145°27′24′′ W |
| 59°58′00′′ N | 145°32′12′′ W |
| 59°14′18′′ N | 144°04′53′′ W |

(iii) *Hinchinbrook to Gulf Safety Fairway* (recommended for outbound vessel traffic). The area enclosed by rhumb lines joining points at:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 59°15′41′′ N | 144°23′35′′ W |
| 59°56′00′′ N | 145°37′39′′ W |
| 59°55′00′′ N | 145°42′00′′ W |
| 59°14′19′′ N | 144°26′25′′ W |

(2) *Unimak Pass Safety Fairway. *

(i) *East/West Safety Fairway.* The area enclosed by rhumb lines joining points at:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 54°25′58′′ N | 165°42′24′′ W |
| 54°22′50′′ N | 165°06′54′′ W |
| 54°22′10′′ N | 164°59′29′′ W |
| 54°07′58′′ N | 162°19′25′′ W |
| 54°04′02′′ N | 162°20′35′′ W |
| 54°22′02′′ N | 165°43′36′′ W |

(ii) *North/South Safety Fairway.* The area enclosed by rhumb lines joining points at:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 54°42′28′′ N | 165°16′19′′ W |
| 54°43′32′′ N | 165°09′41′′ W |
| 54°22′50′′ N | 165°06′54′′ W |
| 54°22′10′′ N | 164°59′29′′ W |

[CGD 81-103, 51 FR 43349, Dec. 2, 1986]
#### Baird v. Peter.

Friday, May 15th, 1813.

i. Interest — Execution for — Statute,*—Under the act of January 29th 1805, “to reform the practice of the district, county, and corporation courts in certain cases,” judgment may be entered, as well as execution issued, for interest, though not mentioned in the writing, and not demanded by the declaration.

See Wallace *&*others v. Baker, 2 Munf. 334, to the same effect.

In an action of debt, on a single bill bearing date the 16th of April 1807, for the sum of $300, payable the 16th of January ensuing ; interest was not demanded in the declaration, nor promised in the specialty. A judgment was entered in the ¡clerk’s office, and confirmed, against the defendant for $300, with legal interest thereon, from the 16th of January 1808 ; — to which a writ of supersedeas was awarded by a judge of this court.

George K. Taylor, for the plaintiff in error, submitted the case.

*

See monographic *note*on “Executions” appended to Paine v. Tutwiler, 27 Gratt. 440.

The principal case is cited with approval in Metcalfe v. Battaile, 1 Gilm. 193.

Thursday, October 21st 1813, the president pronounced the court’s opinion, that, although prior to the act of 1805, ch. 67, (2) it would have been irregular, in a case like the present, to have rendered judgment for interest, when none was demanded in the declaration ; yet, that act having made it the duty of the clerk to issue execution for the principal sum due, with interest from the time the bill became payable until payment thereof, it was not error for the judgment of the court to conform thereto ; and this the rather because no injury is thereby done to the party defendant. On this ground, the court affirms the judgment of the District Court.

(2)

 Note. Rev. Code, 2d vol. ch. 57, p. 82.
#### § 401.27 Compliance with instructions.

Every vessel shall comply promptly with transit instructions given by the traffic controller or any other officer.

[73 FR 9953, Feb. 25, 2008]