alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  SUPP. D – Contributors

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/SUPP. D – Contributors SUPP. D – ContributorsADR2022-02-18T11:26:23-05:00
			
			SUPP. D – ContributorsThe Interagency ADR Working Group, Contracts and Procurement Section, expresses its sincere gratitude to the following individuals for their contribution to this Guide:
Christy J. Barry, Acquisition Litigation/ADR Attorney, Department of the Air Force
Judge Diana S. Dickinson, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
Judge John A. Dietrich, Office of Dispute Resolution for Acquisition
Sarah Stanton Huxta, Senior Attorney, Department of the Air Force
Sharon L. Larkin, former Administrative Judge, Government Accountability Office Contract Appeals Board
Richard J. McCarthy, Senior Attorney, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Judge Patricia J. Sheridan, Civilian Board of Contracts Appeals
Marc Van Nuys, Army ADR Program Director
Gratitude is also extended to those individuals who supported the efforts of the contributors above, and to the contributors to the first edition of this guide.
Subpages (1): Contributors to the First Edition Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
FeedbackSite MapContact

HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?
		Search for:
	HomeAbout ADRLegislation and Interagency ADR Working GroupReport for the President on Significant Developments in Federal Alternative Dispute Resolution, January 2017 (PDF)External-Facing Conflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the PublicConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Services for the Federal WorkforcePrograms and ContactsResources and GuidanceConflict Prevention, Management and Resolution Resources for Federal ADR ProgramsInteragency ADR Working Group Resource CenterEventsCoalition of Federal Ombuds
Search for:  But We Have a Great Case!

															Home/ADR Resources and Guidance/Guidance/But We Have a Great Case! But We Have a Great Case!ADR2022-02-17T19:21:51-05:00
			
			But We Have a Great Case!No matter how strong your case is, there is no such thing as having a great case.  Having any case–strong, questionable, or weak–means you have a problem.  The strength of your case should not dictate whether resolution ***discussions*** are appropriate.  Instead, it helps determine your negotiation strategy, your bargaining strength, and the best alternatives to reaching a settlement. Copyright 2022 ADR.gov | All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  FOIA  |  Section 508
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 111 (Thursday, June 8, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36399-36400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA No. 00-1155, MM Docket No. 00-93, RM-9881]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Lynn Haven, FL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Beacon House Communications, requesting the 
allotment of Channel 282A at Lynn Haven, Florida, as the community's 
first local FM broadcast service. The coordinates for Channel 282A at 
Lynn Haven are 30-11-20 NL and 85-42-20 WL. There is a site restriction 
8.3 kilometers (5.2 miles) southwest of the community.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before July 17, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before August 1, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, D.C. 20554. 
In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Cary S. Tepper, Booth, 
Freret, Imlay & Tepper, P.C., 5101 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Suite 307, 
Washington, DC. 20016-4120.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 00-93, adopted May 17, 2000 and 
released May 26, 2000. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center, Washington, DC. The complete text of 
this decision may also be purchased

[[Page 36400]]

from the Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription 
Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 20036, (202) 
857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-14376 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
RAISE Family Caregiving Advisory Council: November 2020 Meeting Summary

On November 18, 2020, the RAISE Family Caregiving Advisory Council (FCAC) convened to 

review and vote on a set of recommendations to support family caregivers, across the lifespan, 

for inclusion in its initial Report to Congress. The council is tasked with creating a National 

Family Caregiving Strategy, as required by the Recognize, Assist, Include, Support, and Engage 

Family Caregivers Act of 2018 (the RAISE Act).

Call to Order

The meeting began with a call to order and opening remarks by Lance Robertson, Administrator 

and Assistant Secretary for Aging. Administrator Robertson acknowledged the celebration of 

National Family Caregiver Month in November of every year. 

Administrator Robertson thanked his fellow council members for what the council has 

accomplished since its inauguration a little over a year ago and especially, the 

recommendations that were the focus of this meeting in support of the 50 million family 

caregivers in our country who he described as “the cornerstone of our long term systems and a 

true representation of the very best in all of us.” Administrator Robertson acknowledged 

members of the public who tuned in to participate in the meeting, and expressed gratitude to 

ACL’s partners such as the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), John A. Hartford 

Foundation, Community Catalyst, University of Massachusetts at Boston and Advancing States 

whose collaborative efforts have brought understanding and meaning to important areas of the 

council’s work. 

Caregiver Voices: Overview of the NAC “Caregiver Stories Project”

Michael Wittke from the National Alliance for Caregiving (NAC) presented a series of caregiver 

stories and vignettes compiled via interviews by NAC in 2020, with support from The John A.

Hartford Foundation. These stories feature a wide range of diverse caregiver experiences from 

across the United States; caregivers were interviewed about their lived experiences, caregiving 

challenges and experiences, and what they believed policymakers and society should know 

about the caregiver experience. Caregiver stories will be included as part of the council’s report 

to Congress and published on NAC and NASHP’s webpages. In 2021, some stories will be 

released as video clips to promote and disseminate caregiver voices. 

Presentation of Recommendations 

The council voted on, and unanimously approved, twenty-six recommendations to support 

family caregivers, across the lifespan, structured around the council’s goals for the National 

Strategy. These recommendations will also be part of the council’s initial report to Congress.

Next Steps

No formal council activities are scheduled for December 2020. The next council meeting is 

scheduled to take place in January 2021. The council will be discussing its draft Report to 

Congress in the winter and spring of 2021.
#### § 155.5026 Qualified individual and alternate qualified individual.

The vessel response plan must identify a qualified individual and at least one alternate who meet the requirements of 33 CFR 155.1026. The qualified individual or alternate qualified individual must be available on a 24-hour basis.
```

[House Report 111-156]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    111-156

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE 
BILL (H.R. 2346) MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 
           ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2009, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

   June 15, 2009.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

  Ms.  Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 545]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 545, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of the conference 
report to accompany H.R. 2346, the Supplemental Appropriations 
Act, 2009. The resolution waives all points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration. The 
resolution provides that the conference report shall be 
considered as read. The resolution provides that the Chair may 
postpone further consideration of the conference report to a 
time designated by the Speaker.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    The waiver of all points of order against consideration of 
the conference report includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule 
XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports and 
the accompanying joint explanatory statement). The conference 
report does not violate clauses 9 or 10 of rule XXI. Although 
the rule waives all points of order against the conference 
report, the Committee is not aware of any points of order. The 
waiver of all points of order is prophylactic.

                                  

```
Exhibit 32(a)
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The
Southern Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we, the undersigned,
hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, that:

(1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Southern Company for the quarter
     ended September 30, 2003, which this statement accompanies, fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The
     Southern Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of The Southern Company.



                              /s/H. Allen Franklin
                                 Allen Franklin
                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



                              /s/Thomas A. Fanning
                                Thomas A. Fanning
                            Executive Vice President,
                      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Date:  November 12, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7993

KEITH M. WALTON, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:08-cv-00062-RAJ-JEB) 

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 6, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges∗

. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Keith M. Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

 ∗

 The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006). 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Keith M. Walton seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2006). The magistrate 

judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Walton that 

failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could 

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation. Despite this warning, Walton failed to object 

to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. 

The timely filing of specific objections to a 

magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve 

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when 

the parties have been warned of the consequences of 

noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th 

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Walton 

has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific 

objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### SAMUEL P. DINSMORE and others, Respondents, *v.*THE MAYOR, Etc., OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

*Answer—when not frivolous.*

Appeal from an order striking out the defendant’s answer as frivolous.

The plaintiffs alleged that they performed work, labor and services for and at the request of the defendant, its agents and servants, in printing and advertising for it in a newspaper called “ The Stockholder.” The defendant, by the first paragraph of its answer, denied that it requested' or employed the plaintiffs to print or publish the.notices and advertisements named in the complaint and specified in the bill of particulars. In addition to this denial other matters were set up as a further and separate defense. The General Term held, that the denial recited struck at the very foundation, of the plaintiffs’ case, and could not be stricken out as frivolous.

*644
      *E. Delafield Smith,*for the appellant.

*S. P. Dinsmore,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Brady, J.

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J., concurred.

Order reversed with ten dollars costs, besides disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRST
CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC. UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCES TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,845
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 464,229
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                   410,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 464,229
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,524
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                               (0)
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 88,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (91,281)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (91,281)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (91,281)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.30)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
GAO/AIMD-00-243R Pearl Harbor Survivors Association

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

Accounting and Information

Management Division

B-285439

June 30, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Reports for the Pearl Harbor Survivors Association for Fiscal Years 1998 and 1999

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit reports covering the financial statements of the Pearl

Harbor Survivors Association, a federally chartered corporation, for the fiscal years ended

September 30, 1998 and 1999. The corporation’s purpose is to collate, preserve, and

encourage the study of historical episodes, chronicles, mementos, and events pertaining to

“The Day of Infamy, 7 December 1941”, and in particular those memories and records of

patriotic service performed by the heroic Pearl Harbor survivors and nonsurvivors.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the corporation’s

income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditor’s report and the corporation’s financial statements to the Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit reports complied with the

financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we reviewed the

corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes, performed certain analytical

procedures related to information presented in the financial statements, reviewed the

auditors’ reports, and made inquiries to corporation officials or the auditors as we deemed

necessary. We did not review the auditors’ working papers.
B-285439

Page 2 GAO/AIMD-00-243R Pearl Harbor Survivors Association

The audit reports included the auditors’ opinions that with one exception, the financial

statements of the corporation were presented fairly, in all material respects, on a modified

cash basis of accounting. The exception related to the fact the auditors did not observe the

taking of the physical inventory and accordingly, were unable to give an opinion on the

inventory amounts.

We are returning the audit reports you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

David L. Clark

Director, Audit Oversight and Liaison

Enclosure

(911982)
## SERVED: February 4, 2014
US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF 

### SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0776 

### ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS Theparties have filed a Joint Motionto Stay Proceedings inrelatedmatters1• Therein the parties profferthat this matter has been settled and a Notice ofDismissal is forthcoming. WHEREFORE, the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings having been read and considered

_itbe and is hereby ORDERED, as follows: 1. Proceedings inthe above captioned matter are STAYED until June 2, 2014; and 2. The matter may be set for hearing on or after June 2, 2014 unless otherwise resolved priorJune 2, 2014.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

1 See "Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings" SkyWest Airlines FAA 2012-0874, 0872, 0873,0869, 0868,0904,2013- 0617,0619.FDMS No. FAA-2012-0776 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-· Suite 2W10001 

### ONE COPY Todd C. Emerson, 

### Respondent's Counsel Director, Government and Legal Affairs Sky WestAirlines 444 SouthRiver Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 Michael 

### L. Dworkin, 

### Respondent's Counsel MICHAEL 

### L. DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 465 California Street, Suite 210 SanFrancisco, CA 94104 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 EMAIL: law@avialex.com Robert Spitzer, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
2The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

3