alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John C. O’CONNOR and the O’Connor Patent Company, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. John C. O’CONNOR and the O’Connor Patent Company, Respondents.

Nos. 13433, 13434.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 31, 1958.

John C. O’Connor, pro se.

Charles K. Rice, Nelson P. Rose, Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Joseph Kovner, *359Arch M. Cantrall and Claude R. Marshall, Washington, D. C., for Commissioner.

Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this litigation, the taxpayer, John C. O’Connor, appeared pro se in presenting his petition for review of the decision of the Tax Court of the United States, holding (contrary to his contention) that surtaxes, assessed against his personal holding company pursuant to Code provisions, were not violative of Article 1, section 8, of the Constitution.

At the hearing of the cause in this court, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue withdrew his cross-petition (No. 13434).

After due consideration of the oral arguments, the printed briefs, and the record in the cause, we conclude that the decision of the tax court should be affirmed on the basis of its findings of fact and opinion.

It is so ordered.
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000113

-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000114

-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000115

-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000116

-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000117

-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000118

-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000119

-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000120

-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000121

-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000122

v-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 

15
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000123

v-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 

15
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000124

v-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 

15
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000125

v-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 

15
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000126

v-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 

15
PLAINTIFF'S BATISTA 

000127

v-22671-CMA Document 116-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2023 

15
Table 5-20. Estimated Reduction in Incidence of Premature Adult Mortality due to the 

Mercury and Air Toxics Standards in 2016 Occurring Above and Below the Lowest Measured 

Levels in the Underlying Epidemiology Studiesa

a

These estimates are rounded to two significant digits. It is important to emphasize that the scientific evidence 

does not support the existence of a level below which health effects from exposure to PM2.5 do not occur. See 

Appendix 5E for more information. 

Study and Lowest Measured Level (LML)

Total Reduced 

Mortality Incidence Allocation of Reduced Mortality Incidence

Below LML At or Above LML

Pope et al. (2002), 7.5 μg/m3LML 4,200 1,100 3,100

Laden et al. (2006), 10 μg/m3LML 11,000 9,600 1,200
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of SUTTER HOLDING COMPANY,
INC. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, William G. Knuff, III, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ WILLIAM G. KNUFF, III
--------------------------------------
William G. Knuff, III,
Chief Financial Officer of
Sutter Holding Company, Inc.

April 14, 2005
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1151 Security Zones; liquefied hazardous gas tank vessels, San Pedro Bay, California. ( a ) *Definition.* “Liquefied Hazardous Gas” as used in this section means a liquid containing one or more of the products listed in Table 127.005 of this part that is carried in bulk on board a tank vessel as liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas, or similar liquefied gas products.
( b ) *Location.* The following areas are security zones: ( 1 ) All waters, extending from the surface to the sea floor, within a 500 yard radius around any liquefied hazardous gas (LHG) tank vessel that is anchored at a designated anchorage either inside the Federal breakwaters bounding San Pedro Bay or outside at designated anchorages within three nautical miles of the breakwater;
( 2 ) The shore area and all waters, extending from the surface to the sea floor, within a 500 yard radius around any LHG tank vessel that is moored, or in the process of mooring, at any berth within the Los Angeles or Long Beach port areas inside the Federal breakwaters bounding San Pedro Bay;
( 3 ) All waters, extending from the surface to the sea floor, within 1000 yards ahead and 500 yards on each side and astern of any LHG tank vessel that is underway either on the waters inside the Federal breakwaters bounding San Pedro Bay or on the waters within three nautical miles seaward of the Federal breakwaters.
( c ) *Regulations.* ( 1 ) In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.33 of this part, entry into or remaining in these zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Los Angeles-Long Beach, or his or her designated representative.
( 2 ) Persons desiring to transit the area of the security zone may contact the Captain of the Port at telephone number (800) 221-USCG (8724) or on VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) to seek permission to transit the area. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port or his or her designated representative.
( 3 ) When any LHG tank vessels approach within 500 yards of a vessel that is moored or anchored, the stationary vessel must stay moored or anchored while it remains within the LHG tank vessel's security zone unless it is either ordered by or given permission from the Captain of the Port Los Angeles-Long Beach to do otherwise.
( d ) *Authority.* In addition to 46 U.S.C. 70034 and 46 U.S.C. 70051, the authority for this section includes 46 U.S.C. 70116.
( e ) *Enforcement.* The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of these security zones by the Los Angeles Port Police and the Long Beach Police Department.
[COTP Los Angeles-Long Beach 02-005, 68 FR 13233, Mar. 19, 2003]
****

**Executive Director Changes**

**GRANTEE CHECKLIST**

Companion to FAQ: CIL ED Changes

# BEFORE a new CIL ED is hired/promoted:

· Provide the ILA PO’s contact information to the BOD/interim ED.

· Provide the BOD/interim ED the FAQ:  CIL Executive Director Changes and companion checklist. 

· Notify the ILA PO in writing of the BOD’s intent to hire/promote a new ED and the reason for the change i.e. retirement, termination, etc.

· Provide the ILA PO:

· a written description of the selection process indicating it is open, fair, and transparent;

· the ED job description; and

· the final candidate’s resume and supporting documents.

· Submit anticipated budget changes resulting from the proposed personnel change, if applicable.

· Provide the ILA PO meeting minutes of the BOD approving the hire of the candidate. 

· Inform the ILA PO of the new ED’s start date.

· **Receive hiring approval from the ILA PO before hiring an ED/interim ED.**

# New ED first steps:

· Contact the ILA PO to introduce yourself and provide the ILA PO full contact information.

· Update and learn how to access/use: GrantSolutions, Payment Management Systems, and ACLReporting (See FAQ Q11).

· Update contact information on the following websites (See FAQ Q11): 

· System for Award Management (SAM): www.sam.gov

· Dun & Bradstreet (D&B): https://www.dnb.com/

· Initiate contact with ILRU and participate in new ED call series for one year from date of hire (See FAQ Q12).

**Notes**

4/2018	Page 1

2

Rvsd May 2019

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg
§ 334.160 Severn River, at U.S. Naval Academy Santee Basin, Annapolis, Md.; naval restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The waters within the U.S. Naval Academy Santee Basin and adjacent waters of Severn River inclosed by a line beginning at the northeast corner of Dewey Field seawall; thence to latitude 38°59′03′′, longitude 76°28′47.5′′; thence to latitude 38°58′58′′, longitude 76°28′40′′; and thence to the northwest corner of Farragut Field seawall.
( b ) *The regulations.* ( 1 ) No person in the water, vessel or other craft shall enter or remain in the restricted area at any time except as authorized by the enforcing agency.
( 2 ) The regulations in this section shall be enforced by the Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Md., and such agencies as he may designate.
[32 FR 10299, July 13, 1967. Redesignated at 50 FR 42696, Oct. 22, 1985]
#### § 329.4 General definition.

Navigable waters of the United States are those waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. A determination of navigability, once made, applies laterally over the entire surface of the waterbody, and is not extinguished by later actions or events which impede or destroy navigable capacity.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1343

JAMES JONES, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

G.E. GAS TURBINES LLC, Greenville,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

G.E. ENERGY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (6:11-cv-02693-HMH)

Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edgar McDonald, 

III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, 

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

granting summary judgment in favor of G.E. Gas Turbines LLC on 

Jones’ discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of 

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 

2000e-17 (2006 & Supp. IV 2010), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). 

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 3406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1470]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 99-2563; MM Docket No. 99-330; RM-9677]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Kankakee and Park Forest, IL

AGENCY:  Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION:  Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Gene 
Milner Broadcasting Company, Inc., proposing the reallotment of Channel 
260B from Kankakee to Park Forest, Illinois, as the community's first 
local aural transmission service. Channel 260B can be reallotted to 
Park Forest in compliance with the Commission's minimum distance 
separation requirements without the imposition of a site restriction at 
petitioner's licensed site. The coordinates for Channel 260B at Park 
Forest are 41-18-04 North Latitude and 87-49-35 West Longitude.

DATES:  Comments must be filed on or before February 7, 2000, and reply 
comments on or before February 22, 2000.

ADDRESSES:  Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, his counsel, or consultant, as follows: Dennis J. 
Kelly, Esq., Post Office Box 6648, Annapolis, Maryland 21401 (Counsel 
for Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 99-330, adopted December 
8, 1999, and released December 15, 1999. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-
A257), 445 12th Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this 
decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, 
International Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 00-1470 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36742-36743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[RI 38-128]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of a 
Revised Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised information 
collection. RI 38-128, It's Time to Sign Up for Direct

[[Page 36743]]

Deposit, is used to give recent retirees the opportunity to waive 
Direct Deposit of their payments from OPM. The form is sent only if the 
separating agency did not give the retiring employee this election 
opportunity.
    Approximately 45,500 forms are completed annually. The form takes 
approximately 30 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 
22,750 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on 
(202) 606-8358, or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#026f60766d6d6f677b426d726f2c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="533e31273c3c3e362a133c233e7d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before July 
10, 2000.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to:
Ronald W. Melton, Chief, Operations Support Division, Retirement and 
Insurance Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW, Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415;
and
Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office 
Building, NW Room 3002, Washington, DC 20503.
    For information regarding administrative coordination contact: 
Donna G. Lease, Team Leader, Forms Analysis and Design, Budget & 
Administrative Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Director.
[FR Doc. 00-14628 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-U


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
15.1





May 7,
2009








Aceto
Corporation


Lake
Success, New York




We are
aware that Aceto Corporation and subsidiaries has incorporated by reference in
its Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-149586, No. 33-38679, No.
333-90929, and No. 333-110653) our report dated May 7, 2009,relating to
the Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements appearing in
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Pursuant
to Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered
a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a
report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11
of the Act. It should be noted that we have not performed any procedures
subsequent to May 7, 2009.








/s/ BDO
SEIDMAN, LLP





Melville,
New York
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1773. IN RE: THE ESTATE OF MILDRED IRENE CANTRELL.

Regina A. Carter, Administrator of the Estate of Mildred Irene Carter, filed a

multi-count complaint against Vistacare, LLC. On February 23, 2015, the trial court

dismissed two of the plaintiff’sthree claims. However, Carter’sfraud claimremained

pending. Carter then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

“In a case involvingmultiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating

fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not

a final judgment.” (Punctuation and citation omitted.) Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of

America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989). Here, although the trial

court dismissed two of Carter’s three claims, the fraud claim remains pending. 

Therefore, the challenged order is not a final order, and it is appealable only through

the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See id. Because

Carter failed to comply with those procedures, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/05/2015

June 05, 2015
##### 



EXHIBIT 5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Corus Entertainment Inc. (the Company) is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 (the Report).

I, John M. Cassaday, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906
of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 13, 2004
    By:
    
    /s/ John M. CassadayJohn M. Cassaday
President and Chief Executive Officer






---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Corus Entertainment Inc. (the Company) is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 (the Report).

I, Thomas C. Peddie, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant
to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



| | (i) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 13, 2004
    By:
    
    /s/ Thomas C. PeddieThomas C. Peddie
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation (the
Registrants) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies with respect to each
registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated as of May 8, 2006



|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|By /s/ Wm. Michael Warren, Jr.
|Wm. Michael Warren, Jr.       
|Chief Executive Officer       
|                              
|By /s/ G. C. Ketcham          
|G. C. Ketcham                 
|Chief Financial Officer       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation
and will be retained by Energen Corporation and Alabama Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.