alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60324

Conference Calendar

 

ZARKA J. GARROTT, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNKNOWN PETTIFORD, Warden, 

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:02-CV-648-BrS

- - - - - - - - - -

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Zarka J. Garrott, federal prisoner # 03517-025, appeals from

the dismissal with prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. 

Garrott’s sentence was imposed following his conviction in

the Southern District of Illinois on drug-related charges. 

See 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. 

Garrott argues that his indictment is invalid because it was

not returned in compliance with Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of

Criminal Procedure. He submits that because the indictment was

invalid, the Illinois district court was without subject matter
No. 03-60324

-2-

jurisdiction. He argues that he is entitled to raise the issue

of subject matter jurisdiction at any time. 

We cannot agree with Garrott’s contention that he is not

attacking trial or sentencing errors, but rather is attacking

his current detention. Because Garrott’s petition concerns

errors allegedly occurring during or before sentencing,

28 U.S.C. § 2255, rather than Section 2241, is the proper

means of pursuing his jurisdictional argument. See Ojo v. INS,

106 F.3d 680, 683 (5th Cir. 1997). 

“Under the savings clause of § 2255, if the petitioner can

show that § 2255 provides him with an inadequate or ineffective

remedy, he may proceed by way of § 2241.” Wesson v. U.S.

Penitentiary Beaumont, TX, 305 F.3d 343, 347 (5th Cir. 2002),

cert. denied, 123 S. Ct. 1374 (2003). Garrott, however, has

failed to show that he meets the requirements of the savings

clause. See Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904

(5th Cir. 2001). To the extent that Garrott contends that

Section 2255 is inadequate or ineffective to pursue relief based

on Apprendi v, New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), his argument

fails because he cannot make out a sufficient showing to invoke

the savings clause on his Apprendi claim. See Wesson, 305 F.3d

at 347. 

Finally, because he has failed to brief the issue, Garrott

has waived any argument regarding the district court’s

determination that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Garrott’s

petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Yohey v. Collins, 985
No. 03-60324

-3-

F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1995
<CASH>                                              22
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                       757
<INVENTORY>                                     17,734
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,523
<PP&E>                                          32,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,713
<BONDS>                                         26,297
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,861
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,467)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,854
<SALES>                                         23,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,425
<CGS>                                           19,096
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    50
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (468)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (834)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/19/2002 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from ACCEL
International Corporation's 3rd Quarter 1995 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000001985
<NAME> ACCEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            72,017
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       4,960
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 102,279
<CASH>                                             494
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          32,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,943
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 21,279
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             84,281
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      13
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 18,684
<COMMON>                                           524
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,943
<PREMIUMS>                                      29,941
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,644
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 303
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,020
<BENEFITS>                                      12,931
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     22,768
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,209
<INCOME-TAX>                                       377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  23,159
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 21,279
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### JAMES WOLSTENHOLME and others *v.*THE WOLSTENHOLME FILE MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

Cross appeals from a judgment entered upon the report of. a referee.

The judgment was $3,085.84, damages and costs in favor of the plaintiffs.

The defendant appealed from the judgment, upon the ground that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover any judgment, and the plaintiffs appealed upon the ground that they were entitled to recover a greater amount of damages.

All the questions of law in this case were decided on a former appeal, the decision in which is reported in 3 Lansing, 464.

*Benj. H. Austin,*for the plaintiff.

*E. C. Sprague,*for the defendant.

Opinion by

Morgan, J.

Mullin, P. J., concurred. Smith, J., did not sit.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Philip E. Lundquist, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-KSB of Vubotics, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

a)     designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)     disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)     all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | March 31, 2006 |                    | /s/ Philip E. Lundquist |   |
|--------|----------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |           | Philip E. Lundquist     |
|   |           | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"List of Agency Interests and Resources","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EIwtLXduwW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/28-list-agency\/\">List of Agency Interests and Resources<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/28-list-agency\/embed\/#?secret=EIwtLXduwW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“List of Agency Interests and Resources” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"EIwtLXduwW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4942 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4942

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
Making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and 
other activities chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues of 
  said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and for 
                             other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

    Section 1. (a) The provisions of the following bills of the 106th 
Congress are hereby enacted into law:
        (1) H.R. 5547, as introduced on October 25, 2000.
        (2) H.R. 5548, as introduced on October 25, 2000.
    (b) In publishing this Act in slip form and in the United States 
Statutes at Large pursuant to section 112 of title 1, United States 
Code, the Archivist of the United States shall include after the date 
of approval at the end appendixes setting forth the texts of the bills 
referred to in subsection (a) of this section.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1416 Safety Zone; Tarague Basin; Anderson AFB, GU. ( a ) *Location.* The following area, within the U.S. Coast Guard Forces Micronesia/Sector Guam Captain of the Port (COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-15), from the surface of the water to the ocean floor, is a safety zone: A 1-mile radius centered on 13 degrees 35 minutes 59 seconds North Latitude and 144 degrees 55 minutes 38 seconds East Longitude (NAD 1983) including the water arc between points 13 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds North Latitude, 144 degrees 56 minutes 32 seconds East Longitude and 13 degrees 36 minutes 12 seconds North Latitude, 144 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds East Longitude (NAD 1983).
( b ) *Enforcement period.* This section will be enforced only during U.S. Air Force explosive ordnance disposal operations and only when an orange range flag is hoisted 1250 feet west of the Demo Pit at 13 degrees 35 minutes 59.751 seconds North Latitude and 144 degrees 55 minutes 27.4476 seconds East Longitude. In case of an emergency, an explosive ordnance disposal after daylight hours may occur in which case the orange range flag will be illuminated.
( c ) *Regulations.* The general regulations governing safety zones contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply to the zone described in paragraph (a) of this section. Entry into, transit through or within this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated representative thereof.
( d ) *Enforcement.* Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, and any other COTP representative permitted by law, may enforce this safety zone.
( e ) *Waiver.* The COTP may waive any of the requirements of this rule for any person, vessel, or class of vessel upon finding that application of the safety zone is unnecessary or impractical for the purpose of maritime security.
( f ) *Penalties.* Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject to the penalties set forth in 46 U.S.C. 70036 and 46 U.S.C. 70052.
[USCG-2014-0732, 79 FR 53297, Sept. 9, 2014, as amended by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019; USCG-2022-0429, 87 FR 48446, Aug. 9, 2022]
Mission-Ready

The industry-leading UAS that invented and 

continues to define the agile ISR category. 

Search and Rescue

Disaster Response

Force Protection

Combined Arms

Target Following

Battle Damage Assessment

Pattern of Life

Border Security

Asset Protection

Wildlife Monitoring

Agricultural Assessment

Communications Relay

Networked Operations

Anti-Piracy

Fire Fighting
Mark 4 Launcher

Trailer mounted, pneumatically 

actuated, expeditionary

GCS

Point-and-click, real-time control

SkyHook®

No nets, runway-independent 

recovery system

Performance, meet practicality

Agile, virtually undetectable and on station until the job is done, hardworking ScanEagle delivers persistent imagery 

on land or at sea at a fraction of the cost of other surveillance methods. The aircraft’s superior live video feeds 

keep you one step ahead of the situation, whether your mission is agricultural assessment or force protection. And 

because no nets or runway are required, you can keep your footprint small, even when the stakes are big.

ScanEagle ®Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS)

10.2 ft / 3.11 m

5.1 ft / 1.55 m
Dimensions

Length (EO dome): 5.1 ft / 1.55 m

Length (EO900/MWIR dome): 5.6 ft / 1.71 m

Wingspan: 10.2 ft / 3.11 m 

Weights

Empty structure weight: 30.9-39.68 lb / 14-18 kg

Max takeoff weight: 48.5 lb / 22 kg 

Max payload weight: 7.5 lb / 3.4 kg

Performance

Endurance: 24+ hours

Ceiling: 19,500 ft / 5,944 m

Service ceiling: 15,000 ft / 4,572 m 

Max horizontal speed: 80 knots / 41.2 m/s

Cruise speed: 50-60 knots / 25.7-30.9 m/s

Engine: heavy fuel (JP-5 or JP-8) or 

 gasoline engine 

Payload Integration

On-board power: 60 W for payload

Sensor and Data Options

› Turret: EO, EO900 (two EO imagers), MWIR, Dual 

imager (EO and MWIR)

› Video datalink: Analog, digital encrypted

› C2 datalink: Encrypted, unencrypted

EO900/MWIR DOME

EO DOME

ScanEagle is a registered trademark of Insitu. Information contained herein 

is subject to change without notice. Some technologies may not be available in all areas. 

Copyright © Insitu, 2015. All rights reserved.

PR080315
10

2600m

7

2600m

8

2600m

0

2600m

Insitu Inc.

118 East Columbia River Way

Bingen, WA 98605 USA

+1.509.493.8600

insitu.com

contactus@insitu.com

Decision-making superiority delivered
Exhibit 10.3


 


 


 


GENERAL
SALES AGREEMENT


 


Date:
March 1, 2018


Supplier:
Bright Sun Coffee Co Ltd


Dedicated
Agent / Client: GAIS Hong Kong Company Ltd


Indirect
Client:  (Agility)


 


On
March 1, 2018, Bright Sun Coffee Co Ltd. hereby acknowledges and appoints “GAIS Hong Kong Company Ltd” to oversee, manage,
and service clients in the city of Dongguan and Guangzhou, China, particularly and starting with “ (Agility)”. Bright
Sun Coffee Co Ltd. will sell goods directly to GAIS Hong Kong Company Ltd, and will not directly interfere with the affairs between
GAIS Hong Kong Company Ltd and her China client, unless Bright Sun Coffee Co Ltd. was explicitly invited to do so by GAIS Hong
Kong Company Ltd.


 


This
agreement will have a 24 month (two year) period.


 


		●	Start date: March 1, 2018
	 	 	 
		●	End Date: February 29, 2020



 


This
agreement does not include any existing Bright Sun Coffee Co Ltd. clients that has been receiving goods or services from Bright
Sun Coffee Co Ltd. prior to this date, located in the regions mentioned above. To eliminate confusion, any new account from GAIS
Hong Kong Company Ltd is subject to review and approval from Bright Sun Coffee Co Ltd.


 





	On
Behalf of Bright Sun Coffee Co Ltd.	 	On Behalf of GAIS Hong Kong Company Ltd
	 	 	 
	/s/ Mr Winson H Wong	 	/s/ Mr Kirin Tso
	Mr Winson H Wong, CEO	 	Mr Kirin Tso,
	 	 	 
	 	 	On Behalf of  (Agility)
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Leung, Kwok Hei
	 	 	Mr Leung, Kwok Hei
§ 155.430 Standard discharge connections for oceangoing ships of 400 gross tons and above. ( a ) All oceangoing ships of 400 gross tons and above must have a standard shore connection for reception facilities to discharge oily mixtures from machinery space bilges or ballast water containing an oily mixture from fuel oil tanks. The discharge connection must have the following dimensions: ( 1 ) Outside diameter = 215 millimeters (mm).
( 2 ) Inner diameter = according to pipe outside diameter.
( 3 ) Bolt circle diameter = 183 mm.
( 4 ) Slots in flange = 6 holes 22 mm in diameter equidistantly placed on a bolt circle of the above diameter, slotted to the flange periphery. The slot width to be 22 mm.
( 5 ) Flange thickness = 20 mm.
( 6 ) Bolts and nuts, quantity and number = 6 each of 20 mm in diameter and of suitable length.
( b ) A portable adapter that meets the specifications of paragraph (a) of this section and that fits the discharge shore connection, for the discharge of oily wastes from machinery space bilges may be substituted for the standard discharge connection requirement of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The flange must be designed to accept pipes up to a maximum internal diameter of 125 mm and shall be of steel or other equivalent material having a flat face. This flange, together with a gasket of oilproof material, must be suitable for a service pressure of 6 kilograms/square centimeters (kg/cm2).
[CGD 75-124a, 48 FR 45715, Oct. 6, 1983, as amended by USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55572, Nov. 2, 2001]