alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


 


LOAN AGREEMENT


June 29, 2012







Quarry Bay Capital LLC. (the “Lender”) of Suite 600, 1201 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE, 19899-0511, advanced CDN$50,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to GlobeTrac, Inc. (the “Borrower”) of Suite 610, 1100 Melville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 4A6.  The Lender advanced the funds on June 29, 2012.


 


The lender hereby agrees to advance to Borrower the principal amount of CDN$50,000 (the “Principal Sum”) on or before June 29, 2012.


 


The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) from June 29, 2012.  The Borrower is liable for repayment for the Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.


 


The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum with a promissory note (the “Note”) in the attached form.



 




	LENDER	 	 	BORROWER	 
	Quarry Bay Capital LLC	 	 	GlobeTrac, Inc.	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Per:   /s/ Thomas Sharp	 	 	Per:   /s/ John da Costa	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
Authorized Signatory

	 	 	
Authorized Signatory

	 
	 	 	 	
 

	 







 




  





  











  








 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 



	

Principal Amount:  CDN$50,000

	 	 	

June 29, 2012

















For value received GlobeTrac, Inc., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay to the order of Quarry Bay Capital LLC. (the “Lender”) the sum of $50,000 lawful money of Canada (the “Principal Sum”) from June 29, 2012 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment.







The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum in whole or in part at any time without penalty.







This promissory note is payable on demand.







For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.17% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.







The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.



 


 




 




	 	BORROWER	 
	 	

GlobeTrac, Inc.

	 
	 	 	 
	 	Per:   /s/ John da Costa	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	

Authorized Signatory
§ 241.3 References. References cited in paragraphs (f) thru (i) may be obtained from USACE Pub. Depot, CEIM-SP-D, 2803, 52d Avenue, Hyattsville, MD 20781-1102. References cited in paragraphs (d) and (e) may be obtained from the National Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. References (a), (b) and (c) may be reviewed in your local library or by writing your local Congressperson. ( a ) Water Resources Development Act, 1986, Public Law 99-662, 100 Stat. 4082, 33 U.S.C. 2201 *et seq.*
( b ) Water Resources Development Act 1992, Public Law 102-580, 106 Stat. 4797, 33 U.S.C. 2201 *et seq.*
( c ) U.S. Water Resources Council, Economic and Environmental Principles and Guidelines for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies, March 10, 1983.
( d ) Office of Personnel Management, FPM Bulletin 591-30.
( e ) Office of Personnel Management, FPM 591-32.
( f ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Regulation 1165-2-29.
( g ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Regulation 1165-2-121.
( h ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Regulation 1165-2-131.
( i ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Regulation 405-1-12.
[60 FR 5133, Jan. 26, 1995]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4991 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4991

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with 
 the city of Loveland, Colorado, to use Colorado-Big Thompson Project 
  facilities for the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject 
    water for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Schaffer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts with 
 the city of Loveland, Colorado, to use Colorado-Big Thompson Project 
  facilities for the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject 
    water for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT FACILITIES FOR 
              NONPROJECT WATER.

    The Secretary of the Interior may enter into contracts with the 
city of Loveland, Colorado, or its Water and Power Department or any 
other agency, public utility, or enterprise of the city, providing for 
the use of facilities of the Colorado-Big Thompson Project, Colorado, 
under the Act of February 21, 1911 (43 U.S.C. 523), for--
            (1) the impounding, storage, and carriage of nonproject 
        water originating on the eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains 
        for domestic, municipal, industrial, and other beneficial 
        purposes; and
            (2) the exchange of water originating on the eastern slope 
        of the Rocky Mountains for the purposes specified in paragraph 
        (1), using facilities associated with the Colorado-Big Thompson 
        Project, Colorado.
                                 <all>
```
§ 51.6 Propriety standard of review. A discharge is deemed to be proper except that: ( a ) A discharge may be improper if an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion was associated with the discharge at the time of issuance which prejudiced the rights of the applicant.
( b ) A discharge may be improper if there has been a change in policy by the Coast Guard made expressly retroactive to the type of discharge under consideration.
Exhibit 99.1



                            RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Relm Wireless Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ David P. Storey
-------------------------------------
David P. Storey
President and Chief Executive Officer
December 11, 2002
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MIAMI DIVISION 

HERIBERTO VALIENTE, individually

and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. 1:22-cv-22930-RNS 

DEFENDANT’S SECOND NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL 

AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS 

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [ECF NO. 11] 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.8, Defendant Publix Super Markets, Inc. brings 

to the Court’s attention the following supplemental authority: 

 Davis v. PUR Co. (USA), No. 22-CV-6430L, 2023 WL 

3024407 (W.D.N.Y. April 20, 2023). 

Davis—represented by the same counsel representing Plaintiff here—

brought a class action alleging deceptive practices where a product’s packaging 

stated “peppermint” but it contained only a de-minimis amount of peppermint. 

Davis alleged claims for a violation of the state consumer-protection statute, 

breach of warranties, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and unjust 

enrichment. The court dismissed the case “with prejudice” because “a reasonable 

consumer”: 

would not be misled by the Product label’s use of the word 

“peppermint,” into believing that the Product’s flavor was derived 

solely from peppermint components such as peppermint oil or 

Case 1:22-cv-22930-RNS Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2023 Page 1 of 2
2 

peppermint extract....[A]ny consumer who was confused about 

whether the front label was designating a flavor, an ingredient, or 

both, could simply read the Product’s listed ingredients, which do not 

include peppermint oil or peppermint extract. 

Id. at *4. 

Davis is relevant to all arguments in Publix’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s 

First Amended Class Action Complaint [ECF No. 11]. Plaintiff makes nearlyidentical claims about this “honey-lemon” product and Florida law uses the same 

reasonable person standard. 

Dated: April 26, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Daniel B. Rogers 

Daniel B. Rogers 

Danielle A. Greenberg 

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.

201 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 3200

Miami, Florida 33131 

(305) 358-5171 

drogers@shb.com 

dgreenberg@shb.com 

Brian T. Guthrie 

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 

100 North Tampa Street, Suite 2900 

Tampa, Florida 33602 

(813) 202-7100 

bguthrie@shb.com 

Counsel for Defendant Publix Super 

Markets, Inc. 

Case 1:22-cv-22930-RNS Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/26/2023 Page 2 of 2
§ 64.23 Duration of marking on structures. Markings determined to be required shall be established and maintained until: ( a ) The structure is removed; or
( b ) Otherwise directed by the District Commander.
Exhibit 32.1

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David P. Storey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | RELM Wireless Corporation            
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/DAVIDP. STOREY                    
| | David P. Storey                      
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |                                      

August 4, 2005
#### § 80.1350 Netarts Bay, OR.

A line drawn from the northernmost extremity of the shore on the south side of Netarts Bay north to the opposite shoreline.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 (the “Report”),
I, K. S. Adams, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/ K. S. Adams,
Jr.
 K. S.
Adams, Jr.
 Chief
Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-CV-22671-ALTONAGA/TORRES

DELIO BATISTA,

MARIANA LOPEZ,

CARLOS LOPEZ, AND 

RAFAELA VALIENTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AVANT ASSURANCE INC., 

REINIER CORTES, AND 

ANDREA GONZALEZ 

QUINTERO,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE NUNC PRO TUNC

THIS CAUSE, having come before the Court on Plaintiff’s Amended Second Motion for 

Extension of Discovery Deadline Nunc Pro Tunc, and the Court, after having reviewed the Motion 

and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the 

Motion is GRANTED:

The Order Setting Trial Deadlines shall be amended to reflect that all discovery shall be 

completed by June 22, 2023.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers on this _____ day of February 2023.

________________________________ 

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Designated U.S. Magistrate Judge

Counsel of record by CM/ECF

Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 62-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/16/2023 Page 1 of 1
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4831

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States

Postal Service located at 2339 North CaliforniaAvenue in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘RobertoClemente Post Office’’.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4831

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2339 North California Avenue in Chicago,

Illinois, as the ‘‘Roberto Clemente Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4831 EH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 2339 North California Avenue in Chicago, Illi4 nois, and known as the Logan Square Post Office, shall

5 be known and designated as the ‘‘Roberto Clemente Post

6 Office’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the ‘‘Roberto Clemente Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 10,

2000.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1.
                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Alex Demitriev, Chief Executive Officer of Merilus, Inc. (the "Registrant")
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period December 31, 2006 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                              By: /s/  Alex Demitriev
                              Alex Demitriev
                              Chief Executive Officer

March 29, 2007

 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Merilus, Inc. and will be retained by Merilus, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 230.10 Environmental Assessments (EA). ( a ) *Purpose.* An EA is a brief document which provides sufficient information to the district commander on potential environmental effects of the proposed action and, if appropriate, its alternatives, for determining whether to prepare an EIS or a FONSI (40 CFR 1508.9). The district commander is responsible for making this determination and for keeping the public informed of the availability of the EA and FONSI.
( b ) *Format.* While no special format is required, the EA should include a brief discussion of the need for the proposed action, or appropriate alternatives if there are unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources, of the environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives and a list of the agencies, interested groups and the public consulted. The document is to be concise for meaningful review and decision.
( c ) *Integration with Corps Reports.* In the case of planning and/or engineering reports not requiring an EIS, the EA may be combined with or integrated into the report. The same guidance on combining or integrating an EIS within the report shall apply equally to an EA. Where the EA is combined with a Corps report or prepared as a separate document in the case of construction, operating projects and real estate actions requiring an EA, the EA normally should not exceed 15 pages.
Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 70-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2023 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:22-cv-22671-CMA Document 70-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2023 Page 2 of 2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L I NA AMB AS A C AS E Y, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 73712 A ge nc yN o. A 041- 251- 316 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r27, 2011 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , W . F L E T C H E R , an dM U R G U I A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . L i naA m ba s aC a s e y , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of the P hi l i ppi ne s , pe t i t i ons f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) orders di sm i ss i ng her app ea l f r o m a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e p o rta tio n o r d e ra n dd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e o p e n . U nde rthe R E A L I D A c tof 2005, w e c ons true C a s e y ’ s tr ans f e rr e d habe a s pe t i t i on 

# FI LED OC T 6 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS05- 73712 2 a s ap e titio n f

o rr e v ie w , a n dw e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . See M art i nez-R osas v. G on zales , 424 F . 3d 926, 928- 29 ( 9th C i r . 2005) . W e r e vi e w de n o v o c o n s titu tio n a l c la im s , Kha n v. H older , 584 F . 3d 773, 776 ( 9th C i r . 2009) , and w e g r a n t th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . T he B IA vi ol at ed C as ey ’ s e qu alprot ec t i on ri gh t s by denyi ng se ct i on 21 2(c) r e lie f o n th e b a s is th a t s h e w a s in d e p o rta tio n p r o c e e d in g s . See Servi n-Espi no za v. A s h c r o ft , 309 F . 3d 1193, 1196- 99 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( B I A ’ s a dm i ni s tr a t i ve pol i c yof appl y i ng s e c t i on 440( d) of the A nt i t e rr or i s m and E f f e c t i ve D e a th P e na l tyA c tof 1996 t o ba rs e c t i on 212( c ) r e l i e f a ga i ns tde port abl e butnote xc l udabl e a l i e ns du ri ng the t i m e per i od betw ee n M ay14 , 19 97 , and Jun e 7, 19 99 , vi ol at es equal p r o te c tio n ) . A c c o r d in g ly , w e r e m an dto g iv e C a s e y“th e s a m e o p p o rtu n ityto ap p ly for § 21 2(c) re l i ef

thatexcl ud abl e a l i ens w er e gi ven. ” Id . a t1199. I n l i ghtof our di sposi t i on , w e do n otre ac h the i ss ue of w hether A E D P A § 4 40 (d) app l i es re troac t i vel y t o C as ey . T he go vernm ent ’ s m oo tness ar gu m enti s unp er suas i ve. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (116)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,106
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,093
<PP&E>                                          47,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,044)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,711
<BONDS>                                          2,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           421
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,803
<SALES>                                        936,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               936,160
<CGS>                                          931,426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  931,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,144
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,546
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,598
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,598
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
        

</TABLE>