alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Stout, Alan

From: Stout, Alan

Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 8:32 AM

To: Julia Rege (jrege@globalautomakers.org); 'gambrozaitis@autoalliance.org'; 'Carter, 

Sarah@ARB'

Cc: Antonio Fernandez; Olechiw, Michael

Subject: Updated Tier 3 amendments

Attachments: Tier 3 amendment adds 09 19 2014.docx

Julia, Giedrius, and Sarah, 

The attached file includes updated regulatory language for our direct final rulemaking. Additional edits since our July 7 

version are noted. The change in §600.117 probably warrants some extra attention, but most of the other changes are 

not especially noteworthy; in any case, we wanted to get a complete set out to you to make sure we don’t find ourselves 

with any surprises later. I’m not sure this would need the full-scale distribution for review, but I will leave that to your 

collective judgment. 

This doesn’t address the coastdown issue, which I understand is still something to figure out. 

There is no real deadline for responding. We’ll move ahead with what we have. If you find something that needs 

attention along the way, let us know and we’ll do our best to work things out. There have been some minor 

complications in other parts of the direct final rule, and we still need to go through the bureaucratic stages of review as 

we work our way toward signature. At this point, I’m expecting to get the rule signed in February, though I could be off 

by a month or two in either direction. 

Alan
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00737

- CV

In re Nakisha Davis

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

Edward Smith , Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

Filed: April 20, 2023
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000546

07-OCT-2015

09:49 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

February 6, 2007

Aceto Corporation
Lake Success, New York

We are aware that Aceto Corporation and subsidiaries has incorporated by
reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-38679, No.
333-90929, and No. 333-110653) our report dated February 6, 2007, relating to
the Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial statements appearing in
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006.
Pursuant to Regulation C under the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not
considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our
firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. It should be noted that we have not performed any
procedures subsequent to February 6, 2007.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Melville, New York
H. R. 4794

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To require the Secretary of the Interior to complete a resource study of the 600

mile route through Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey,

New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia, used by George Washington

and General Rochambeau during the American Revolutionary War.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route National Heritage Act of 2000’’.

SEC. 2. STUDY OF THE WASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLUTIONARY

ROUTE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years after the date on

which funds are made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Resources of the

House of Representatives, a resource study of the 600 mile route

through Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New

Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia, used

by George Washington and General Jean Baptiste Donatien de

Vimeur, comte de Rochambeau during the American Revolutionary

War.

(b) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with State and local historic

associations and societies, State historic preservation agencies, and

other appropriate organizations.

(c) CONTENTS.—The study shall—

(1) identify the full range of resources and historic themes

associated with the route referred to in subsection (a), including

its relationship to the American Revolutionary War;

(2) identify alternatives for National Park Service involvement with preservation and interpretation of the route referred

to in subsection (a); and
H. R. 4794—2

(3) include cost estimates for any necessary acquisition,

development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance associated with the alternatives identified pursuant to paragraph

(2).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S

N O S . W R - 8 1 , 2 3 7 - 0 2 & W R - 8 1 , 2 3 7 - 0 3 E X P A R T E R O B E R T S H A Y N E K I N S L O W , A p p l i c a n t O N A P P L I C A T I O N S F O R W R I T S O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O S . C R 0 1 6 4 8 - H C - 2 & C R 0 1 6 4 9 - H C - 2 I N T H E 6 D I S T R I C T C O U R T T H F R O M R E D R I V E R C O U N T Y A L C A L A , J., fi led a concurring opin ion . CONCURR ING

OP INION I join this Court’s rema

nd order be cause I ag ree with its observa tion that applicant has alleg ed fac ts that “if true, might entitle h i m to relief .” Be cause applicant has pleade d a colora ble ineffe ctive-a ssistance-of

-c o u n s e l c la im, I would order the habea s court on rema nd to appoint counsel for him upon reque st if he is indig ent, reg ardle ss of whether the trial court holds a hear ing. See Ex p a r te P o in te r , 492 S.W .3d 318, 320-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (per curia m) (Alca la, J ., concur ring ). At a minimum , h o weve r, in addition to the order ’s curr ent admonition that the appointment of counsel is mandatory for an indige nt applicant upon reque st if the habea s court holds a h ea ri ng , I would include a further admonishment that an indige nt applicant is “entitled” to the appointment of counsel upon reque st “if the court conclude s that the interests of justice require repr esenta tion.” See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . A R T . 1.051(d). Filed: Oc tober 5, 2016 Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steve Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s)1350, as adoptedpursuant to (s)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of 

          operations of the Company.
function calcSelectArrowDimensions(e){var n=".avada-select-parent .select-arrow, .gravity-select-parent .select-arrow, .wpcf7-select-parent .select-arrow";(void 0!==e?jQuery(e).find(n):jQuery(n)).filter(":visible").each(function(){0<jQuery(this).prev().innerHeight()&&jQuery(this).css({height:jQuery(this).prev().innerHeight(),width:jQuery(this).prev().innerHeight(),"line-height":jQuery(this).prev().innerHeight()+"px"})})}jQuery(window).on("load fusion-element-render-fusion_tb_woo_cart fusion-element-render-fusion_tb_woo_checkout_tabs fusion-element-render-fusion_tb_woo_checkout_billing fusion-element-render-fusion_tb_woo_checkout_shipping fusion-element-render-fusion_woo_cart_shipping",function(){calcSelectArrowDimensions(),setTimeout(function(){calcSelectArrowDimensions()},100)}),jQuery(window).on("fusion-dynamic-content-render",function(e,n){calcSelectArrowDimensions(n)});
Cotton and Wool Outlook (PDF Format)
CWS-0299, February 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This report is published by the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department 
of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20036-5831.  A summary in ASCII form was
released on February 12, 1999.

Printed copies are available from the ERS-NASS order desk.  Call, toll-free,
1-800-999-6779 and ask for  Stock #ERS-CWS-0299. ERS-NASS accepts MasterCard
 and Visa.

Please note that this publication is in .PDF format and 30.6 KB in size.
Acrobat Reader 3.0 or later is required to view and print this document.
The Adobe Acrobat .PDF format is used to preserve all the layout and
content used in the original publication. To download and get help using
the Adobe Acrobat Reader, please go to:

http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html

For More Information on ERS Publications and Data
*************************************************
Visit the ERS web site at:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov

Other reports are available from the Products and Services
area on the ERS web site from:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/periodic.htm

For sales information on ERS publications, go to:
   http://www.econ.ag.gov/prodsrvs/sales.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
END_OF_FILE
Greener 

Water-Efficient Landscapes Start With 

Certified Irrigation Professionals 

Your Grass 

Can Be 
WaterSense labeled certification programs: • Verify professional proficiency in water-efficient irrigation 

system design, installation and maintenance, and performance audits. 

• Test designers, installation/maintenance professionals, 

and auditors on their water-efficiency knowledge through examinations. 

• Certify only experienced irrigation 

system designers and installation/ maintenance professionals. 

• Require independent oversight. • Demonstrate awareness of recent technology and 

innovations. 

Consulting an irrigation professional certified through a WaterSense labeled program can save water, time, and money. Ask your irrigation professional about water-saving technologies, such as weather-based irrigation controllers and moisture sensors, available for your outdoor watering system. Even more important, conduct regular checks and maintenance of your system to ensure ongoing water efficiency. A certified irrigation professional with proven knowledge of water-efficient technologies and practices can help you design, test, and maintain an effective watering system for your yard and garden. 

Certified irrigation 

auditors can conduct 

uniformity tests to 

ensure that your lawn 

is evenly watered. 
WaterSense labeled certification programs: • Verify professional proficiency in water-efficient irrigation 

system design, installation and maintenance, and performance audits. 

• Test designers, installation/maintenance professionals, 

and auditors on their water-efficiency knowledge through examinations. 

• Certify only experienced irrigation 

system designers and installation/ maintenance professionals. 

• Require independent oversight. • Demonstrate awareness of recent technology and 

innovations. 

Consulting an irrigation professional certified through a WaterSense labeled program can save water, time, and money. Ask your irrigation professional about water-saving technologies, such as weather-based irrigation controllers and moisture sensors, available for your outdoor watering system. Even more important, conduct regular checks and maintenance of your system to ensure ongoing water efficiency. A certified irrigation professional with proven knowledge of water-efficient technologies and practices can help you design, test, and maintain an effective watering system for your yard and garden. 

Certified irrigation 

auditors can conduct 

uniformity tests to 

ensure that your lawn 

is evenly watered. 
Greener 

Water-Efficient Landscapes Start With 

Certified Irrigation Professionals 

Your Grass 

Can Be
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AllianceGaming Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Hadrill, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

 Dated:  February 9, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Richard Haddrill                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard Haddrill                       |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive  Officer)         |

 

----
#### Charles E. Stratton et al. v. Sidney B. Oldfield.

Filed September 18, 1894.

No. 5789.

Acts and declarations of conspirators which are parts of the *res gestx,*and therefore admissible against their co-conspirators, include those only which are done and made during the pend-ency of the conspiracy and in furtherance of its objects.

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Ferguson, J.

*C. A. Baldwin*and *Weaver & Oilier,*for plaintiffs in error, cited:

*Logan v. United States,*144 U. S., 263; *People v. Dilwood,*29 Pac. Rep. [Cal.], 420; *Brown v.*Herr, 21 Neb.,'113. '

*I)e France & Richardson, contra.*

Post, J.

This was an action for damage in the district court for Douglas county, in which the defendant in error, plaintiff below, recovered judgment. The cause of action stated in the petition is substantially as follows: The defendants below, Stratton, Lewis, Petty, and Emminger, knowing the plaintiff therein to be the owner of certain real estate in Saunders county, conspired together to cheat and defraud him out of the value thereof. That in pursuance of such conspiracy to defraud they falsely represented to him that certain notes held by them were good securities, and that the makers thereof were solvent and able to pay in full, when in fact said makers were insolvent and said notes were entirely worthless; that, relying upon such false statements, he conveyed to them the said real estate and accepted in exchange therefor said worthless securities. The defendants answered separately by a general denial. At *703the trial the plaintiff below was permitted, over the objection of Stratton and Emminger, to show admissions by Petty, made six months after the consummation of exchange of property, tending to prove the allegations of the petition as .against the objecting defendants. In that the court erred. The admissions of acts and declarations of co-conspirators is limited to what is said and done while the conspiracy is pending and in furtherance of the objects thereof. (3 Greenleaf, Evidence, 94; Wright, Conspiracy, 113,116.) The judgment is reversed as to the plaintiffs in error Stratton and Emminger and remanded for further proceedings in the district court.

Reversed and remanded.
14910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

:201D- O~ CO i

IDocket No. FAA 2889=*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-184-AD]

RIN 2120-AA64

Ain\'ortbiness Directives; Airbus Model A300-600 and A3\ 0 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR1\1).

SUMlVIARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product

\ llo -D.R .

ROUTlNG SYMBOL

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthilless

infonnatioll (MeAL) originated by an aviation authority of another country to Identify

Ai'J,y')· 1

rN'TI.ALSJ8IG

C.G-Jv'>---

D.H.

3/d'> (0

.and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsate ROUTTNGSYMOOL

~IJ -IILI

o

ROlJ1'ING SYM Ol

-M - :,

IN~~~~\

"ATE

Investigation has detemlined that the defects reported on both rudders

corresponded to areas tbat had been reworked in production. The

investigation confirrned that the defects were the result of de-boncling

between the skin and honeycomb core. Such reworks were also performed

on some rudders fitted on A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes.

An extended de-bonding, ifnot detected and cOITected, may degrade the

structural integrity of the rudder. The loss of the rudder leads to

degradation of the handling qualities and reduces the controllability of the

aeroplane.

Surface defects were visually detected on the rudder of one Airbus A319

and one A321 in-service aeroplane.

condition as:

* * * * * *

'1<,TIAlS'S'G

.HE
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. Rose, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the
period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                           |  |       |  |               
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----- |  | --------------
|/s/    THOMAS F. ROSE                      |  | Date: |  | March 10, 2004
|Thomas F. Rose                             |  |       |  |               
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |       |  |               



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 21




Subsidiaries of


Encompass Group Affiliates, Inc.


at June 30, 2010





Encompass Parts Distribution, Inc.


775 Tipton Industrial Drive


Lawrenceville, GA  30046


EIN:  20-1088535


State of Incorporation:  Delaware





Hudson Street Investments, LLC


1306 Continental Drive


Abington, MD 21009


EIN:  54-2137152


State of Incorporation:  Delaware





Cyber-Test, Inc.


775 Tipton Industrial Drive, Suite D


Lawrenceville, GA  30046


EIN:  20-1106218


State of Incorporation:  Delaware





SpectruCell, Inc.


1306 Continental Drive


Abington, MD 21009


EIN:  56-2425121


State of Incorporation:  Delaware





Vance Baldwin, Inc.


7060 State Road 84, #12


Ft. Lauderdale, FL 03317


EIN:  59-0718315


State of Incorporation:  Florida





Tritronics, Inc.


1306 Continental Drive


Abington, MD 21009


EIN: 52-1036520


State of Incorporation: Maryland





Encompass Service Solutions, Inc.


775 Tipton Industrial Drive, Suite D Lawrenceville, GA  30046


EIN: 26-4157403


State of Incorporation: Delaware











Encompass Parts Distribution, S. de R.L. de C.V.


c/oCervantes, Aguilar-Alvarez y Sainz, S.C.


Torre del Bosque


Blvd. M. Avila Camacho 24 – 6° Piso


Lomas de Chapul Tepec


Deleg. Miguel Hidalgo


11000 Mexico, D.F.





Encompass Distribution Canada, Inc.


5925 Tomken Road


Units 13-16


Mississauga, Ontario,L4W4L8


* * * *
#### § 167.503 In the approaches to Los Angeles-Long Beach TSS: Southern approach.

(a) A separation zone is established bounded by a line connecting the following geographic positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 33°35.50′ N | 118°10.30′ W. |
| 33°35.50′ N | 118°12.75′ W. |
| 33°19.70′ N | 118°03.50′ W. |
| 33°19.00′ N | 118°05.60′ W. |

(b) A traffic lane for northbound traffic is established between the separation zone and a line connecting the following geographical positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 33°35.50′ N | 118°09.00′ W. |
| 33°20.00′ N | 118°02.30′ W. |

(c) A traffic lane for southbound traffic is established between the separation zone and a line connecting the following geographical positions:

| Latitude | Longitude |
| --- | --- |
| 33°35.50′ N | 118°14.00′ W. |
| 33°18.70′ N | 118°06.75′ W. |

[USCG-2000-7695, 65 FR 53913, Sept. 6, 2000]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. ---=22;;;...-=83;;..;;3;..;;6....;;-B=E=R;;.;;.._ ______ _ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

JOFF STENN WROY PHILOSSAINT, 

Defendant. 

I ---------------

AUG O 8 2022 

ANGELA E. NOBLE 

CLERK U.S. DIST. CT. 

S.D. OF FLA. - W.P.B. 

ORDER TO UNSEAL 

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Motion of the United States to Unseal the 

Complaint in this matter. It appearing to the Court that the motion is well taken and should be 

granted, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint is unsealed and may be placed in the public 

portion of the court file. 

~ DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Florida, this ~ day of August, 2022. 

WILLIAM MA TTHMAN 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 6 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/08/2022 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RELM Wireless Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William P. Kelly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

RELM Wireless Corporation

| |     |                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ WILLIAMP. KELLY                                                  
| |     | William P. Kelly
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer



November 5, 2008
#### § 52.54 Expenses.

No expenses of any nature whatsoever incurred by an applicant, his or her counsel, witnesses, or others acting on behalf of the applicant shall be paid by the Government, except that an applicant may be entitled to representation by a Coast Guard law specialist if the case has been processed under the Whistleblower Protection Act. 10 U.S.C. 1034(f)(3)(A).
#### § 55.3 Who is covered by this subpart?

This subpart applies to all Coast Guard installations.