alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rockingham

No. 7752

#### State of New Hampshire v. City of Portsmouth

November 16, 1977

*937
      *David H. Souter,*attorney general, and *Roger G. Burlingame,*assistant attorney general and *Andreiv R. Grainger,*attorney *(Mr. Grainger*orally), for the state.

*Peter J. Loughlin,*city solicitor *(Mr. Loughlin*orally), for the city of Portsmouth.

Douglas, J.

This is an action for injunctive relief brought by the state to prohibit the city of Portsmouth from attempting to sell certain property for nonpayment of assessed taxes. Upon an agreed statement of facts the following questions of law were reserved and transferred by the Superior Court *(Mullavey,*J.) without ruling:

> 1. Where the City of Portsmouth has assessed taxes against certain property belonging to New Hampshire State Port Authority, which property is being used or occupied by other than the State, and where the New Hampshire State Port Authority and the State of New Hampshire are without funds appropriated or otherwise to pay said assessments, may the City of Portsmouth sell said property at tax sale to satisfy its claim for said taxes ?

> *2.*If the answer to Question #1 is in the negative, may the City of Portsmouth seek to collect its taxes pursuant to RSA 80:50?

The dispute between the parties centered on whether RSA 72:23 I, *as amended,*(Supp. 1975) constituted a waiver of tax immunity by the state that would permit the city of Portsmouth to sell state property for delinquent tax payments. The state argued that the proper remedy was to seek relief from the General Court, which had narrowed the tax exemption but had failed to appropriate the funds. On October 27, 1977, legislature enacted the following provisions:

> 84. Payment in Lieu of Taxes, City of Portsmouth. Amend RSA 271-A by inserting after Section 16 the following new section:

> 271-A: 17 Payments in Lieu of Taxes. The property of the authority is declared to be public property and shall *938be exempt from all taxes and special assessments of the state or any political subdivision thereof; provided that in lieu of such taxes the authority shall make payments to the city of Portsmouth in the amount of $30,000 annually for the tax year commencing April 1, 1975, and each subsequent tax year for highway maintenance, fire protection or other services.

> 85. Appropriation. The sum of $120,000 is hereby appropriated for payments in lieu of'taxes to the city of Portsmouth for the tax years April 1, 1975 — March 31, 1976; April 1, 1976 — March 31, 1977; April 1, 1977-March 31, 1978; April 1, 1978 — March 31, 1979.

Accordingly, in light of this recent legislation neither question transferred needs to be answered.

*Remanded.*

Lampron, J., did not participate in the decision of this case; the others concurred.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCAD-16-0000563 

21-FEB-2017 

01:40 PM 

SCAD-16-0000563
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

IKE EMANUEL DURU,


Petitioner,
 

vs.


 OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,


Respondent.
 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

(Prior Supreme Court No. 27356; ODC Case No. 05-031-8183)
 

ORDER DENYING PETITION
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Upon consideration of the Disciplinary Board’s Report
 

and Recommendation to Deny Reinstatement of Petitioner Ike
 

Emmanuel Duru and the record in this matter, we find and
 

conclude, after careful and thorough review, that Petitioner Duru
 

failed to follow court rules governing his disbarment,
 

particularly in his failure to inform his Maui employer or the
 

Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) of his foreign disbarment,
 

and failed to fulfill substantive conditions of this court’s
 

November 10, 2005 reciprocal disbarment, particularly his failure
 
to successfully seek reinstatement in Georgia. 


We further find and conclude that Respondent Duru has 

failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence, as required by 

Rule 2.17(b)(4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of 

Hawai'i, that he is rehabilitated from the ethical conduct 

underlying that disbarment, particularly his engaging in 

discussion of legal matters with a licensed attorney and the 

attorney’s client, his failure to report in his petition criminal 

and civil litigation in which he was involved during his 

disbarment, and his failure to timely act with initiative 

regarding his outstanding student loan obligations. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied.
 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Duru shall bear
 

the expenses incurred in the investigation into and processing of
 

his petition, upon the timely submission of a verified bill of
 

costs by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. 


DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 21, 2017. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 


/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
 

2
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

79–011 2009

111th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 111–25 

CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT OF FINE GRAIN GRAPHITE TO 

BE USED FOR SOLAR CELL APPLICATIONS AND FOR THE FABRICATION OF COMPONENTS USED IN ELECTRONIC AND SEMICONDUCTOR FABRICATION, AND TWO DUAL-MOTOR, DUALSHAFT MIXERS TO BE USED TO PRODUCE CARBON FIBER AND 

EPOXY PREPREGS FOR THE COMMERCIAL AIRLINE INDUSTRY, 

WILL NOT MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR SPACE 

LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, 

PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105–261, SEC. 1512 

MARCH 17, 2009.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

jbell on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

In accordance with the provisions of section 1512 of the Strom 

Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 

(Public Law 105–261), I hereby certify to the Congress that the export of fine grain graphite to be used for solar cell applications and 

for the fabrication of components used in electronic and semiconductor fabrication, and two dual-motor, dual-shaft mixers to be 

used to produce carbon fiber and epoxy prepregs for the commercial 

airline industry is not detrimental to the U.S. space launch industry, and that the material and equipment, including any indirect 

technical benefit that could be derived from these exports, will not 

measurably improve the missile or space launch capabilities of the 

People’s Republic of China. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, March 17, 2009. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Artemis International Solutions Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick Ternier,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                                             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                                             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Patrick Ternier     |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Patrick  Ternier         |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | March  30, 2004          |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Company and will be retained by Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 2 NASS, USDA

All layers in the U.S. on March 1, 1999, totaled 324 million, up 3 percent from a year ago. The

324 million layers consisted of 264 million layers producing table or commercial type eggs,

56.6 million layers producing broiler-type hatching eggs, and 2.86 million layers producing

egg-type hatching eggs. Rate of lay per day on March 1, 1999, averaged 69.7 eggs per 100

layers, up fractionally from the 69.6 a year ago.

Laying flocks in the 30 major egg producing States produced 5.95 billion eggs during February,

up 3 percent from February 1998. The average number of layers during February, at 305

million, was up 3 percent from a year earlier.

Individual State estimates are available for the 30 major egg producing States. These States are

listed on page 8 of this release and account for approximately 95 percent of the total U.S. egg

production. Production for the other States are grouped into an "Other States" category and

combined with the 30 States published individually to obtain a U.S. estimate. Individual State

estimates' for "Other States" are available annually in the "Layers and Egg Production"

report.

Egg-Type Chicks Hatched Up 3 Percent

Egg-type chicks hatched during February totaled 35.6 million, up 3 percent from February

1998. EggStac place, 8(ents appwı ̋[(Egg-ty)10(p9.8(1998. )Tjı ̋/Fe465.836 Tmı ̋072.44 404.2)]T36ı ̋BTı ̋

p
Chickens and Eggs  ̋-0.002 Tcı ̋0.0Eggs
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 4 NASS, USDA

Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 6 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 8 NASS, USDA

Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 10 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 12 NASS, USDA

Forced Molt: Percent of All Layers by Month,

United States, 1998-99 1

Month Percent Being Molted Percent with Molt Completed

1998 1999 1998 1999

Percent Percent Percent Percent

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

4.1

5.2

4.4

2.2

5.5

4.8

3.9

3.9

4.1

4.9

3.7

2.7

4.1

4.9

3.3

Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 14 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 16 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 17 NASS, USDA
Chickens and Eggs Agricultural Statistics Board

March 1999 18 NASS, USDA

The next "Chickens and Eggs" report will be released at 3 p.m. ET on April 23, 1999.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on the

basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation,

and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities

who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape,
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Worlds.com Inc.(the
"Company"). for the six months ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Christopher Ryan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  * the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  /s/ Christopher
Ryan
 Christopher
Ryan
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 
 Date:
December 1, 2008
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report of Innofone.com,
Incorporated (the "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Alex Lightman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

      (1)   The Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and


      (2)   The information contained in the Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report
            fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
            and result of operations of the Registrant.



Date: February 2, 2006                By:  /s/ Alex Lightman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Alex Lightman
                                           Chief Executive Officer, President
                                           and Principal Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                      *****


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial Note on Part 149
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 149 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 149.305 What are the survival craft requirements for temporary personnel? ( a ) When temporary personnel are on board a manned deepwater port and the complement exceeds the capacity of the survival craft required under § 149.304 of this part, the deepwater port must have additional liferafts to ensure that the total capacity of the survival craft is not less than 150 percent of the personnel on board at any time.
( b ) The liferafts required in paragraph (a) of this section need not meet the launching requirements of paragraph (b) to § 149.308 of this part, but must comply with the stowage requirements of 46 CFR 108.530(c).
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39179, July 1, 2013]
§ 151.08 Denial of entry. ( a ) Unless a ship is entering under force majeure, no oceangoing tanker or any other oceangoing ship of 400 gross tons or more required by § 151.10 to retain oil, oil residue, or oily mixtures on board while at sea, and no oceangoing ship carrying a Category A, B, or C NLS cargo or NLS residue in cargo tanks that are required to be prewashed under 46 CFR Part 153, may enter any port or terminal under § 158.110(a) of this chapter unless the port or terminal has a Certificate of Adequacy, as defined in § 158.120 of this chapter.
( b ) A COTP may deny the entry of a ship to a port or terminal under § 158.110(b) if— ( 1 ) The port or terminal does not have a Certificate of Adequacy, as required in § 158.135 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) The port or terminal is not in compliance with the requirements of subpart D of part 158.
[CGD 88-002, 54 FR 18404, Apr. 28, 1989, as amended by USCG-2000-7641, 66 FR 55570, Nov. 2, 2001]
#### § 3.45-20 Sector Detroit Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone.

Sector Detroit's office is located in Detroit, MI. The boundaries of Sector Detroit's Marine Inspection Zone and Captain of the Port Zone include all navigable waters of the United States and contiguous land areas within the boundaries of an area starting from a point at latitude 41°00′00′′ N, longitude 84°48′12′′ W on the Ohio-Indiana boundary, proceeding east to longitude 82°25′00′′ W; thence north to the international boundary in Lake Erie at latitude 41°40′36′′ N, longitude 82°25′00′′ W; thence north along the international boundary to latitude 44°43′00′′ N in Lake Huron; thence due west to latitude 44°43′00′′ N, longitude 84°30′00′′ W; thence south to the Michigan-Ohio boundary at latitude 41°42′13′′ N; thence west along the Michigan-Ohio boundary to the Ohio-Michigan-Indiana boundary at latitude 41°41′46′′ N, longitude 84°48′22′′ W; thence south along the Ohio-Indiana boundary to the starting point.

[USCG-2009-0929, 76 FR 13510, Mar. 14, 2011]
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(iii)A(53)





AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO 
ACUITY BRANDS LIGHTING, INC.
SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into on the dates set forth below, by and between ACUITY BRANDS LIGHTING, INC. (the “Company”) and Karen J. Holcom (“Executive”);


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into a Severance Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2018 (“Severance Agreement”) and amended as of May 28, 2019, providing for the payment of certain compensation and benefits to Executive if Executive’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Severance Agreement in the manner hereinafter provided;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Agreement is hereby amended, as follows:


		
	1.
	Section 4.2 is hereby amended by deleting “55%” from clause (i) and substituting “75%” in lieu thereof.


		
	2.
	The following Section 4.10 is appended to the end of Section 4 thereof:


 4.10    “Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan” - If Executive is a participant of the Acuity Brands, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as Amended and Restated Effective July 1, 2019, except as otherwise noted (the “SERP”) and Executive’s Date of Termination occurs prior to the date that Executive has three (3) Years of Credited Service (as defined in the SERP), Executive shall be deemed to have earned three (3) years of Credited Service thereunder.  
		
	3.
	This Amendment to the Severance Agreement shall be effective as of August 20, 2019.  Except as hereby modified, the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date(s) written below.


	
				
	 
	 
	COMPANY

	 
	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE
	 
	ACUITY BRANDS LIGHTING, INC.

	/s/ Karen J. Holcom
	 
	By:  
	/s/ Vernon J. Nagel

	Karen J. Holcom
	 
	 
	VERNON J. NAGEL

	 
	 
	 
	Chairman, President and CEO

	Date: 8/22/2019
	 
	Date:
	8/20/2019
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Tibor N. Vertes                                                                                                        | Dated:   | March                21, 2007 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------|
|   | Tibor                N. Vertes                                                                                                            |               |                          |
| Title: | Chairman,                Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of                Gaming & Entertainment Group, Inc. |

| By:    | /s/                Gregory L. Hrncir                                                                                             | Dated:   | March                21, 2007 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------|
|   | Gregory                L. Hrncir                                                                                                 |               |                          |
| Title: | President                and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Gaming &                Entertainment Group, Inc. |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                         AERO SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC.


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with this Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of Aero Systems
Engineering, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, I, Charles
H. Loux, President and CEO, of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

3.   This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
     and
4.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Dated: August 8, 2002                                /s/ Charles Loux
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Charles H. Loux, President and CEO
                                            Aero Systems Engineering, Inc.
§ 25.803 Claims payable. A claim for damage to or loss of real or personal property is payable under this subpart if: ( a ) Caused by the United States, its employees, agents or contractors during containment, countermeasures, cleanup, mitigation, and disposal activities under the National Contingency Plan; and
( b ) In the exercise of care reasonable under the circumstances, the incident giving rise to the claim was necessary and the damage unavoidable.
Editorial Note on Part 117
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

§ 117.732 Nacote Creek. ( a ) The Route 9 bridge, mile 1.5, shall open on signal, except that from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m., the draw shall open if at least two hours notice is given.
( b ) The draw of the Atlantic County (Rte. 575) bridge, mile 3.5 at Port Republic, shall open on signal if at least eight hours notice is given.
[CGD05-94-065, 61 FR 29960, June 13, 1996]