alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Community Preventive 

Services Task Force 

Recommendations

Older adults are at higher risk for malnutrition. Malnutrition is caused by 

too much, too little, or an imbalance of protein, calories, or other nutrients 

which lead to adverse effects on a person’s body and how it functions. The 

Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) recently released their 

findings and recommendations about Older Americans Act home-delivered 

and congregate meal programs in order to reduce malnutrition, improve 

energy and protein intake, and improve health and well-being.

This is based on a systematic review of 20 studies.

Key findings/results of the review:

Dietary Behaviors

Home-Delivered Meals Participants meeting Recommended 

Daily Allowances (RDA) for:

CALORIES

7.1

percentage points

PROTEIN

5.9

percentage points

Food and Nutrition Security

Older adults who are malnourished:

CONGREGATE MEAL 

PARTICIPANTS

percentage points

9.0

HOME-DELIVERED 

MEAL PARTICIPANTS

15.5

percentage points

This project was supported in part by grant number 90PPNU0002-01-00 from the U.S. Administration for 

Community Living, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking 

projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and conclusions. Points of 

view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official ACL policy.
Submitted on record and briefs August 10,.

conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing September 9, 1992

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*MICHAEL ROGER LANDRY, *Appellant.*

(D91-05815M; CA A72647)

836 P2d 1377

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Hari Nam S. Khalsa, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*170PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal trespass. The trial court placed him on probation, subject to the condition, *inter*alia: “Defendant is prohibited from consuming or possessing any alcoholic liquor in any form under any circumstances.” Defendant contends that the record does not support a conclusion that that condition is reasonably related to his offense, his reformation or protection of the public. The state agrees, and we accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 21 (Monday, February 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01656]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Application of Aerodynamics Incorporated for Certificate 
Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2015-1-16) Docket DOT-OST-
2014-0114.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not deny the application for a 
certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate 
scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and mail to 
Aerodynamics Incorporated, and revoke its certificates to conduct 
interstate and foreign charter air transportation of persons, property, 
and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
February 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket DOT-OST-2014-0114 and addressed to the Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC and should be 
served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine O'Toole, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division, (X-56, Office W86-469), U.S. Department of Transportation, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

    Dated: January 16, 2015.
Brandon M. Belford,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2015-01656 Filed 1-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.1



Annual Directors’ Compensation Summary (Non-Employee Directors)


	
		
	Annual Cash Retainer
	$155,000 per year through December 31, 2019; $162,500 per year effective January 1, 2020 



	Annual Equity Retainer
	$155,000 through December 31, 2019; $162,500 effective January 1, 2020, payable under the Lockheed Martin Corporation Directors Equity Plan*



	Audit Committee Chairman Retainer
	$30,000 per year 



	Management Development and Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer


	$30,000 per year 



	Other Committee Chairman Retainers
	$20,000 per year 



	Lead Director Retainer
	$35,000 per year through December 31, 2019; $50,000 per year effective January 1, 2020



	Travel Accident Insurance
	$1,000,000

	Deferred Compensation Plan
	Deferral plan for cash retainer



	Director Education
	Reimbursed for costs and expenses



	Stock Ownership Guidelines
	Ownership in common stock or stock units with a value equivalent to five times the annual cash retainer within five years of joining the Board








*  In June 2014, the board of directors approved a resolution to the effect that each non-employee director would elect to receive the equity portion of the retainer in the form of stock units and would not elect options to purchase shares unless the board resolution was further amended or revoked. The Lockheed Martin Corporation Directors Equity Plan provides that except in certain circumstances, stock units vest 50 percent on June 30 and 50 percent on December 31 following the grant date.  Effective for any annual retainer earned on or after January 1, 2018, (1) any director who has satisfied the Stock Ownership Guidelines may elect to be paid the vested portion of the annual retainer in equity (along with any accumulated dividend equivalents) on the earlier of termination or retirement from the board of directors or March 31 following the first anniversary of the award date, and (2) any director who has not satisfied the Stock Ownership Guidelines shall continue to be paid the vested portion of the annual retainer (along with any accumulated dividend equivalents) upon termination or retirement from the board of directors.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Environmental Conflict Resolution","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yR8Ss7S17Q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/about-adr\/environmental-conflict-resolution\/\">Environmental Conflict Resolution<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/about-adr\/environmental-conflict-resolution\/embed\/#?secret=yR8Ss7S17Q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Environmental Conflict Resolution” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"yR8Ss7S17Q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 1 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 2 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 3 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 4 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 5 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 6 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 7 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 8 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 9 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 11 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 12 of 13
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:22-cr-20326-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2022 Page 13 of 13
Case 1:22-cv-22787-RNS   Document 36-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2023   Page 1 of 3

Case 1:22-cv-22787-RNS   Document 36-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2023   Page 2 of 3

Case 1:22-cv-22787-RNS   Document 36-1   Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2023   Page 3 of 3
#### John G. ST. LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. Donald C. CLEMMER et al., Appellees.

No. 7730.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 8, 1958.

Decided Oct. 24, 1958.

Charles W. Laughlin, Richmond, Va. (Court appointed counsel) for appellant.

John G. St. Lawrence, pro se.

Henry St. J. FitzGerald, Asst. U. S. Atty., Alexandria, Va. (L. S. Parsons, Jr., U. S. Atty., Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge, and HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant complains of the dismissal by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus directed to the warden of the federal prison of Lor ton, Virginia, where he is serving a sentence for violation of the narcotic laws, the sentence having been imposed by the District Court for the District of Columbia.

The appellant has heretofore applied to the sentencing court for relief under Section 2255 of Title 28 U.S.C.A., upon the ground that his conviction was based upon perjured testimony; that his counsel improperly represented him; and upon numerous other grounds. After a hearing lasting four days, that petition was dismissed, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit refused to permit an. appeal *in forma pauperis.*

He then applied in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for a writ of habeas corpus, from the denial' of which the present appeal was taken,. *471We allowed him to proceed *in forma pauperis*in this Court, and we appointed counsel for him. He, nevertheless, complains of his representation here and has sent voluminous letters and other communications repeating his grievances.

We have examined all of his contentions and find no merit in any of them. It does not appear that any grounds exist which have not been, or could not have been, asserted in the Courts of the District of Columbia on appeal or in the proceedings under Section 2255 of Title 28 U.S.C.A., in the District of Columbia, upon which an extensive hearing has already been had; and as no transcript of the testimony could aid him in presenting any matter that is open for consideration here, we think that the Court below has committed no error in refusing to order a transcript to be furnished him at the Government’s expense.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(ao)

             SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

I.    DIRECTOR COMPENSATION. Directors who are employees of the Corporation do
not receive additional compensation for serving as directors of the Corporation.
The following table sets forth current rates of cash compensation for the
Corporation's non-employee directors.

<TABLE>
<S>                                               <C>
Annual Retainer                                   $30,000 (payable in quarterly installments)

Additional annual fee for the Audit
Committee Chair, Compensation
Committee Chair, Stock Award                      $5,000 (payable in quarterly installments)
Committee Chair
</TABLE>

II.   EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION. The following table sets forth the current
base salaries provided to the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and four
most highly compensated executive officers.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
               EXECUTIVE OFFICER                          CURRENT SALARY
               -----------------                          --------------
<S>                                                       <C>
Don E. Marsh, Chairman of the Board and Chief
              Executive Officer                             $1,000,000

David A. Marsh, President and Chief Operating
   Officer                                                  $  440,000

 Jack J. Bayt, President and Chief Operating
   Officer, Crystal Food Services Division                  $  310,000

        William L. Marsh, Senior Vice
        President-Property Management                       $  305,000

Daniel L. Cross, President and Chief Operating
        Officer, Supermarket Division                       $  295,000
</TABLE>

      In addition to their base salaries, the Corporation's Chief Executive
Officer and four most highly compensated executive officers are also eligible
to:

   -  receive cash bonuses under the Corporation's Management Incentive Plan;

   -  participate in the Corporation's long-term incentive program, which
      currently involves the award of performance based restricted stock and
      performance accelerated stock options pursuant to the Corporation's 1998
      Stock Incentive Plan;

   -  participate in the Corporation's Deferred Compensation Plan; and

   -  participate in the Corporation's broad-based benefit programs generally
      available to all full-time employees, including health, disability and
      life insurance programs.
writ_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  






 





 




  





4











  






 





 




  





5











  






 





 


 


 

6
#### § 20.205 Ex parte communications.

Ex parte communications are governed by subsection 557(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 557(d)).
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

September 05, 2023

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Clerk - Southern District of Florida

U.S. District Court 

400 N MIAMI AVE

MIAMI, FL 33128-1810 

Appeal Number: 23-12601-F 

Case Style: Nadejda Jastrjembskaia v. inCruises, LLC, et al

District Court Docket No: 0:22-cv-61704-DMM

The enclosed copy of the Clerk's Order of Dismissal for failure to prosecute in the above 

referenced appeal is issued as the mandate of this court. See 11th Cir. R. 41-4. 

Any pending motions are now rendered moot in light of the attached order. 

Clerk's Office Phone Numbers 

General Information: 404-335-6100 Attorney Admissions: 404-335-6122 

Case Administration: 404-335-6135 Capital Cases: 404-335-6200 

CM/ECF Help Desk: 404-335-6125 Cases Set for Oral Argument: 404-335-6141 

Enclosure(s) 

DIS-2 Letter and Entry of Dismissal

 

USCA11 Case: 23-12601 Document: 5 Date Filed: 09/05/2023 Page: 1 of 2 

JG Sep 5, 2023 MIAMI

Case 0:22-cv-61704-DMM Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 23-12601-F

______________ 

NADEJDA JASTRJEMBSKAIA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

INCRUISES, LLC, 

INGROUP INTERNATIONAL, LLC, 

f.k.a. inCruises International, LLC,

 Defendants - Appellees.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

__________________________________________

ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of 

prosecution because the appellant Nadejda Jastrjembskaia failed to file a Transcript Order Form 

in this Court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and 

Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules. 

Effective September 05, 2023. 

DAVID J. SMITH

Clerk of Court of the United States Court

of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

FOR THE COURT - BY DIRECTION 

USCA11 Case: 23-12601 Document: 5 Date Filed: 09/05/2023 Page: 2 of 2

Case 0:22-cv-61704-DMM Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-22992-DPG

FRIDA KAHLO CORPORATION, a 

Panamanian corporation, and FRIDA KAHLO 

INVESTMENTS, S.A., a Panamanian 

corporation,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ESPERANTO, INC., a Texas corporation,

Defendant.

/

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL AND NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiffs, Frida Kahlo Corporation and Frida Kahlo Investments, S.A. (collectively, 

“Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), hereby

request that the Court dismiss this action, with prejudice, and retain jurisdiction to enforce 

settlement agreement, and states:

1. On November 30, 2022 Plaintiffs notified the Court that the Defendant had been 

served and would be requesting an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. Defendant has 

not responded to the Complaint or pleaded a counterclaim as of the date of this filing.

2. The Parties entered into settlement communications in December and have now 

completed and executed a formal, written, and confidential settlement agreement, having an 

effective date of February 1, 2023 (“Settlement Agreement”).

3. As part of the Settlement Agreement, the Parties agreed to a dismissal of this case, 

with prejudice, with each Party to be responsible for its, his or her own attorney’s fees and costs;

Case 1:22-cv-22992-DPG Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 1 of 2
2

and providing that the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida shall retain 

exclusive jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the confidential Settlement Agreement.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court dismiss this action, with 

prejudice, with the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the confidential Settlement 

Agreement, with each Party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs, and grant such further relief 

as the Court deems just and proper.

Date: February 6, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/Darlene Barron

Darlene Barron, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 108873

dbarron@lex188.com

William R. Trueba, Jr., Esq.

Florida Bar No. 117544

wtrueba@lex188.com

TRUEBA & SUAREZ, PLLC

7480 Bird Road, Suite 601

Miami, Florida 33155

Telephone: (305) 482-1001

Facsimile: (786) 516-2826

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 6, 2023, the foregoing document is being served on

Defendant, Esperanto, Inc., via email to:

Robert Rivas

Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP

11400 W. Olympic Blvd.

9th Floor

Los Angeles, California 90064

PH: 310-478-4100 ext. 6669

FAX: 310-479-1422

E-Mail: rrivas@wrslawyers.com

Case 1:22-cv-22992-DPG Document 8 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2023 Page 2 of 2
ADR LUNCHTIME SERIES PRESENTATION

Positivity in Workplace Conflict Management

This session explores the role of positive psychology – the scientific study of 

happiness and well-being – in the management of workplace conflict. We will 

discuss positive coaching, positive trainings, and positive facilitations. The goal 

of the session is to share insight on current studies and trends, available 

resources, and possible next steps in integrating positivity into our practices. 

We will consider whether and when to draw on the principles of positive 

psychology as a valuable and integral part of ADR work. 

Speaker: Vik Kapoor

ADR Attorney Advisor, Federal Emergency Management Agency 

Executive Council Member, ABA Section of Dispute Resolution

Presented by the Interagency ADR Working Group, Workplace Conflict 

Management Section in coordination with the Department of Energy

Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Time: Noon - 1:30 pm EST (Please allow extra time for security procedures)

Location: U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave, SW, Room GJ-015

(DOE Forrestal Small Auditorium)

Washington, D.C. 20585

Travel by Metro: Green and Yellow Line - L'Enfant Plaza station (exit to 

Maryland Avenue) OR Orange and Blue Line - Smithsonian station (exit to 

Holocaust Museum/Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

NEW: To attend in person, everyone, including federal employees with an HSPD12 government ID badge, must register by email to cindy.mazur@dhs.gov and 

provide name, citizenship, and agency/employer by March 17. You do not need 

to register to call-in or participate online. 

NEW: To join the online event and follow the presentation in real time go to:

https://usdoe.webex.com/usdoe/onstage/g.php?d=991712289&t=a then click 

"Join Now" and enter Event Password Adr1234 (it’s case sensitive). Then follow 

the instructions to join the audio portion. To listen only via teleconference, 

please call 1-650-479-3208 and use access code: 991 712 289. Please disregard 

the prompt for an Attendee ID by pressing # sign. To submit questions to the 

speaker during the program, please use online chat or email 

victor.voloshin@eeoc.gov. Materials for this presentation will be posted at 

http://www.adr.gov several days before the program.
§ 183.524 Fuel pumps. ( a ) Each diaphragm pump must not leak fuel from the pump if the primary diaphragm fails.
( b ) Each electrically operated fuel pump must not operate except when the engine is operating or when the engine is started.
( c ) If tested under § 183.590, each fuel pump, as installed in the boat, must not leak more than five ounces of fuel in 21 ⁄ 2 minutes, inclusive of leaks from fuel line, fuel filter and strainer.
[CGD 74-209, 42 FR 5950, Jan. 31, 1977, as amended by CGD 77-98, 42 FR 36253, July 14, 1977]