alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.2




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-162108, 333-38236, 333-38250, 333-47326, 333-87092 and 333-97787), Form S-3 (No. 333-152944) and Form S-3 filed as post-effective amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-103434) of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2011 relating to the financial statements of Kremeworks, LLC and Subsidiary which appears in this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 2011.




/s/ Blackman Kallick, LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1

                       AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORPORATION
              (a wholly owned subsidiary of American Express Travel
                         Related Services Company, Inc.)

          COMPUTATION IN SUPPORT OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            Nine Months Ended
                              September 30,
                              (Unaudited)                 Years Ended December 31,
                            -----------------   ------------------------------------------
                               2004    2003      2003     2002     2001     2000     1999
                              -----   -----     ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
<S>                           <C>     <C>       <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings:
Net income                    $ 188   $ 189     $  260   $  228   $  277 $  286     $  223
Income tax provision             91      99        135      118      140    150        120
Interest expense                619     639        852      916    1,458  1,459      1,130
                              -----   -----     ------   ------   ------  ------    ------

Total earnings (a)            $ 898   $ 927     $1,247   $1,262   $1,875  $1,895    $1,473
                              =====   =====     ======   ======   ======  ======    ======

Fixed charges -
   interest expense (b)       $ 619   $ 639     $  852   $  916   $1,458  $1,459    $1,130
                              =====   =====     ======   ======   ======  ======    ======

Ratio of earnings
   to fixed charges (a/b)      1.45    1.45       1.46     1.38     1.29    1.30      1.30
</TABLE>

Note: Gross rentals on long-term leases were minimal in amount in each of the
     periods shown.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 29, 2018 

# Order

Clerk June 29, 2018

156579 (55)

GENESEE COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER

JEFFREY WRIGHT,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON, DENNIS

BOW, KARYN MILLER, BONNIE MATHIS,

PAULA ZELENKO, MARILYN HOFFMAN,

LARRY GREEN, JAKE LAFURGEY, RAY

FOUST, DAVID GUIGEAR, ROBERT M.

PALMER, RICK CARUSO, WILLIAM W.

KOVL, MAXINE ORR, VILLAGE OF

GOODRICH, VILLAGE OF GAINES, VILLAGE

OF LENNON, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF

MUNDY, TOWNSHIP OF ARGENTINE,

CH ARTER TOWNSHIP OF FLINT, CHARTER

TOWNSHIP OF MT. MORRIS, TOWNSHIP OF

GAINES, and CITY OF FLUSHING,

Plaintiffs,

SC: 156579

v C OA: 331023

Genesee CC: 11

- 097012

- CK

GENESEE COUNTY,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

GENESEE COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filing its supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as

timely filed if submitted on or before July 25, 2018.
#### DORA PEEL, Respondent, *v.*JOHN KERN, Appellant.

*Witness —irrelevant questions for the purpose of discrediting*— discretiona/ry.

Inquiries on irrelevant topics to discredit a witness, and tlie extent to which a course of irrelevant inquiry may be pursued, are matters submitted to the sound discretion of the trial court. The exercise of that discretion is not the subject of legal review, except in cases of plain abuse and injustice. *(La Beau*v. *The People,*34 IT. Y., 233; *Gft. Western Turnpike Oo.*v. *Loomis,*32 id., 127; *QretonY. Smith,*33 id, 245.)

This action was tor an assault and battery. Tbe defendant was sworn on the trial and denied committing the same.

The conflict between the plaintiff and her witnesses, and the defendant and his witnesses was entirely irreconcilable.

The court, on this state of facts, permitted, for the purpose of affecting the credibility of the witness, questions to be put to him, as to his having beaten two other persons, and having had difflcnlty with a third. Affirmative answers were given, accompanied by statements which tended to justify the assault, if they did not wholly justify the same.

• *John*Fleming, for appellant. *Theodore J. Oogswell,*for respondent. ■

Opinioii by

Barnard, J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Tappbn and Taloott, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 3 NASS, USDA
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 4 NASS, USDA
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 5 NASS, USDA

Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 7 NASS, USDA

Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 9 NASS, USDA

Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 11 NASS, USDA
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 12 NASS, USDA
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 13 NASS, USDA

Cattle on Feed: Number Marketed, 1,000+ Capacity Feedlots,

by Month, State, 7 States, and United States, 1997-98
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 14 NASS, USDA



Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 20 NASS, USDA
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 23 NASS, USDA

Terms and Definitions of Cattle on Feed Estimates

Cattle on feed
Cattle on Feed Agricultural Statistics Board

February 1999 24 NASS, USDA
The next "Cattle on Feed" report will be released at 3 p.m. ET on March 19, 1999.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on the
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 6, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35998-35999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14188]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Termination--
Frontier Insurance Company

AGENCY:  Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of 
the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 21 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 1999 Revision, published July 1, 1999, at 64 FR 35864.

[[Page 35999]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6779.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Certificate 
of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above named Company, under 
the United States Code, Title 31, Sections 9304-9308, to qualify as an 
acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated effective today.
    The Company was last listed as an acceptable surety on Federal 
bonds at 64 FR 35875, July 1, 1999.
    With respect to any bonds, including continuous bonds, currently in 
force with above listed Company, bond-approving officers should secure 
new bonds with acceptable sureties in those instances where a 
significant amount of liability remains outstanding. In addition, in no 
event should bonds that are continuous in nature be renewed.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/index.html. A hard copy may be purchased 
from the Government Printing Office (GPO), Subscription Service, 
Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular 
from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-000-00527-6.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6A04, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: May 31, 2000.
Judith R. Tillman,
Assistant Commissioner, Financial Operations, Financial Management 
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-14188 Filed 6-5-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
§ 183.530 Spud, pipe, and hose fitting configuration. Except when used for a tank fill line, each spud, pipe, or hose fitting used with hose clamps must have: ( a ) A bead;
( b ) A flare; or
( c ) A series of annular grooves or serrations no less than 0.015 inches deep, except a continuous helical thread, knurl, or groove.
[CGD 74-209, 42 FR 5950, Jan. 31, 1977, as amended by USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34716, June 29, 1999]
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2000 Page 1 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2000 Page 2 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2000 Page 3 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2000 Page 4 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2000 Page 5 of 6
Case 0:00-cr-06024-PAS Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2000 Page 6 of 6
§ 323.3 Discharges requiring permits. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in § 323.4 of this part, DA permits will be required for the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. Certain discharges specified in 33 CFR part 330 are permitted by that regulation (“nationwide permits”). Other discharges may be authorized by district or division engineers on a regional basis (“regional permits”). If a discharge of dredged or fill material is not exempted by § 323.4 of this part or permitted by 33 CFR part 330, an individual or regional section 404 permit will be required for the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States.
( b ) *Activities of Federal agencies.* Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States done by or on behalf of any Federal agency, other than the Corps of Engineers (see 33 CFR 209.145), are subject to the authorization procedures of these regulations. Agreement for construction or engineering services performed for other agencies by the Corps of Engineers does not constitute authorization under the regulations. Division and district engineers will therefore advise Federal agencies and instrumentalities accordingly and cooperate to the fullest extent in expediting the processing of their applications.
( c ) *Pilings.* ( 1 ) Placement of pilings in waters of the United States constitutes a discharge of fill material and requires a section 404 permit when such placement has or would have the effect of a discharge of fill material. Examples of such activities that have the effect of a discharge of fill material include, but are not limited to, the following: Projects where the pilings are so closely spaced that sedimentation rates would be increased; projects in which the pilings themselves effectively would replace the bottom of a waterbody; projects involving the placement of pilings that would reduce the reach or impair the flow or circulation of waters of the United States; and projects involving the placement of pilings which would result in the adverse alteration or elimination of aquatic functions.
( 2 ) Placement of pilings in waters of the United States that does not have or would not have the effect of a discharge of fill material shall not require a section 404 permit. Placement of pilings for linear projects, such as bridges, elevated walkways, and powerline structures, generally does not have the effect of a discharge of fill material. Furthermore, placement of pilings in waters of the United States for piers, wharves, and an individual house on stilts generally does not have the effect of a discharge of fill material. All pilings, however, placed in the *navigable waters of the United States,* as that term is defined in part 329 of this chapter, require authorization under section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (see part 322 of this chapter).
[51 FR 41232, Nov. 13, 1986, as amended at 58 FR 45036, Aug. 25, 1993]
§ 384.11 What are the Corps of Engineers obligations in interstate situations? ( a ) The responsible Corps official is responsible for: ( 1 ) Identifying proposed federal financial assistance and direct federal development that have an impact on interstate areas;
( 2 ) Notifying appropriate officials and entities in states which have adopted a process and which select the Corps of Engineers program or activity.
( 3 ) Making efforts to identify and notify the affected state, areawide, regional, and local officials and entities in those states that have not adopted a process under the Order or do not select the Corps of Engineers program or activity;
( 4 ) Responding pursuant to § 384.10 of this part if the responsible Corps official receives a recommendation from a designated areawide agency transmitted by a single point of contact, in cases in which the review, coordination, and communication with the Corps of Engineers has been delegated.
( b ) The responsible Corps official uses the procedures in § 384.10 if a state process provides a state process recommendation to such official through a single point of contact.
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4933

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reauthorize the program for

veterans readjustment appointments within the Federal Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 24, 2000

Mr. KLINK (for himself and Mr. EVANS )introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reauthorize the

program for veterans readjustment appointments within

the Federal Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Readjust5 ment Appointments Reauthorization Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF VETERANS READJUSTMENT

7 APPOINTMENTS PROGRAM.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4214(b)(3)(B)(ii) of title

9 38, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘Decem10 ber 31, 1989.’’ and inserting ‘‘the date of the enactment
2

•HR 4933 IH

1 of the Veterans Readjustment Appointments Reauthoriza2 tion Act of 2000.’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to vacant positions

5 in the civil service under chapter 33 of title 5, United

6 States Code, initially announced on or after the date of

7 the enactment of this Act.

8 (c) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act shall be

9 construed as affecting appointments made under the pro10 visions of section 4214(b) of title 38, United States Code,

11 before January 1, 2000.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 70 
          - [GA-T5-2000-01b; FRL-6711-1] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule. 

# SUMMARY:

                        EPA proposes full approval of the operating permit program of the State of Georgia. In the final rules section of this                         **Federal Register**                        , EPA is approving the State's operating permit program as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. An explanation for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time.                     

# DATES:

Written comments must be received by July 10, 2000. 

# ADDRESSES:

Address comments to Kim Pierce, Regional Title V Program Manager, Operating Source Section, Air & Radiation Technology Branch, EPA, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Copies of the State's submittals and other supporting documentation relevant to this action are available for inspection during normal business hours at EPA, Air & Radiation Technology Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kim Pierce, EPA, Region 4, at (404) 562-9124. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    For additional information see the direct final rule which is published in the final rules section of this                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated: May 15, 2000. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 00-14167 Filed 6-7-00; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5009 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5009

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
 for host families of foreign exchange and other students from $50 per 
                        month to $200 per month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
 for host families of foreign exchange and other students from $50 per 
                        month to $200 per month.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR AMOUNTS PAID TO 
              MAINTAIN CERTAIN STUDENTS AS MEMBERS OF TAXPAYER'S 
              HOUSEHOLD.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 170(g)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amounts paid to maintain 
certain students as members of taxpayer's household) is amended by 
striking ``$50'' and inserting ``$200''.
    (b) Adjustment for Inflation.--Section 170(g) of such Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Adjustment for inflation.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of any taxable year 
                beginning in a calendar year after 2001, the $200 
                amount contained in paragraph (2)(A) shall be increased 
                by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) $200, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which the taxable year begins 
                        by substituting `calendar year 2000' for 
                        `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                        thereof.
                    ``(B) Rounding.--If any increase determined under 
                paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $10, such increase 
                shall be rounded to the next highest multiple of 
                $10.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply to 
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
Clarifications to “Transcript of ECI/NTSB/FAA Meeting” dated February 14, 2013, Job No. 15494

**Page # Line #**  10 13 ****CLARIFICATION***** NTSB a greed there should be a reduction of scope to Safety Recommendation A
- 12 -7 . 14 4 *****CLARIFICATION***** ...e xpanded the SDRs to include the previously provided compilation (2/7/13) plus new additions. 16 12 *****CLARIFICATION***** All cylinders produced prior to 2002 were branded classic cast cylinders (Titans came later) . 25 6 ***** CLARIFICATION***** T he cylinders were apart when received.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Union Agreements in the Cotton-Textile Industry

              																	Theodore, Rose					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Union Agreements in the Cotton-Textile Industry : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 885*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 										1947,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4340,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER