alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 96
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 96 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36281, June 25, 2010, and by USCG-2014-0410, 79 FR 38432, July 7, 2014.

§ 96.480 What is the status of a certificate if the issuing organization has its authority terminated? Any certificate issued by an organization authorized by the Coast Guard whose authorization is later terminated remains valid until— ( a ) Its original expiration date,
( b ) The date of the next periodic audit required to maintain the certificate's validity, or
( c ) Whichever of paragraphs (a) or (b) occurs first.
Order entered January 2 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00849 - CR DOMINIQUE RASHAD FRA ZIER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18 - 70781 - I



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 30, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or b efore January 2 9, 2020

. Appellant is cautioned that further extension requests are disfavored.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 22-CR-80128-CANNON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. 

GEORGE MURILLO, 

Defendant. 

I 

FACTUAL PROFFER 

The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and GEORGE 

MURILLO (hereinafter the "defendant") agree that had this case proceeded to trial, the United 

States would have proven the following elements and facts beyond a reasonable doubt: 

Elements 

(i) that the defendant knowingly possessed a firearm and ammunition in 

or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, 

(ii) before possessing the firearm and ammunition, the defendant had been 

convicted of a felony - a crime punishable by imprisonment for more 

than one year, and 

(iii) the defendant knew he was a convicted felon. 

1. On May 17, 2022, defendant MURILLO sold a Smith & Wesson, model M&P 

Bodyguard 38 Crimson Trace, .38 Special caliber revolver and twenty-five (25) rounds ofHornady 

ammunition to another person in exchange for $300. 

Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2022 Page 1 of 2
L·, 

2 

2. On July 12, 2022, defendant MURILLO sold a Beretta, model 92FS, 9mm pistol 

and fifteen ( 15) rounds of ammunition to another person in exchange for $500. 

3. The firearms and ammunition described in paragraphs 1 and 2 were manufactured 

outside the State of Florida, therefore traveled in and affected interstate or foreign commerce. 

4. Prior to this incident, the defendant was convicted and adjudicated of a felony 

offense. Moreover, the defendant had knowledge of his felony conviction. 

5. All events occurring in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere. 

Date: lq/4) aa 

By: 

ONIO GONZALEZ 

TES ATTORNEY 

TRE S GATZ 

ASSIST ANT UNITED ST ATES ATTORNEY 

By: ~ A ,t: ~ . KRi'Y MILITELLO 

ASSISTANT FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER 

By: 

Case 9:22-cr-80128-AMC Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/12/2022 Page 2 of 2
Hon. C. H. Gavness State Au~ditor Capitol Building Austin, Texas Dear Mr. Cavness: Opinion No. S-142 Re: Travel expense of State cmployeea.

You have requested our opinion as to whether, “where it is cheaper, the traveling (State) employee may return to his home daily rather than:tohave to stay out at State expense.”

Section 8a ofArticle VI of Chapter 81ofthe Acts of the 53rd Legislature, 1953, pagt 127, the General’Appropriation Bill, at page 345, provides ,in,part:

“The amounts herein.appropriated for the payment oftraveling expenses ofthe agencies are intended to be the maximum amounts that shall be paid by the State as re’imbursement of travel expenses of State employee,s. The agency heads are charged with the responsibility of planning the,-activities oftheir offices Sothat all travel axpenae ahall be paid in full aa long ae the certified expense accounts are within the maximum herein prescribed.”

As thus provided, the planning and control of employees’ travel and its incident expense is the responsibility of the head of the agency concerned, within the maximum limit fixed by the’Legislature. It is within the province of such agency head to require the employee who is away on official temporary duties to report back to his permanent station on **week** ends or eachawniiqglfhe deems it expedient, and it is **ou.r** opinion that an employee~who.performs travel in compliance therewith is entitfad to reimbursement uponhia proper application.Hon. C. H. Cavness, page 2 (S-142)

Insofar as it conflicts herewith, Attorney General’s Opinion O-1404 (1939) is hereby overruled. SUMMARY When an employee is authorized to return to his home by the head of his agency, it is a proper travel expenditure under Section 8a ofArticle VI of Chapter 81, Acts ofthe 53rd Legislature, 1953.

Attorney General’s Opinion O-1404 (1939) insofar as it conflicts herewith is hereby overruled. APPROVED: ‘

. Yours very+ruly, Willis Gresham JOHN BEN SHEPPERD Public Affairs Division Attorney General JohnDavenport Reviewer Robert S. Trotti First Assistant

, JahnBen Shepperd Attorney General JA:he
§ 245.55 Permit requirements. ( a ) *Permits for removal.* Marking and removal operations by the owner, operator or lessee are normally permitted under nationwide permits for such activities as outlined in part 330 of this chapter. The activities must meet certain conditions as stated in those regulations, and additional permits may still be required from state or local agencies.
( b ) *Special conditions.* The Corps of Engineers may add individual or regional conditions to the nationwide permit, or require an individual permit on a case-by-case basis.
§ 183.112 Flotation material and air chambers. ( a ) Flotation materials must meet the requirements in § 183.114 as listed in Table 183.114 when used in the: ( 1 ) Engine room bilge,
( 2 ) engine room, or
( 3 ) bilge, unless located in a sealed compartment.
( b ) Air chambers used to meet the flotation requirements of this subpart must not be integral with the hull.
[CGD 77-145, 43 FR 56859, Dec. 4, 1978; 44 FR 47934, Aug. 16, 1979]
§ 402.10 Post-clearance date operational surcharges. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, a vessel that reports for its final transit of the Seaway from a place set out in column 1 within a period after the clearance date established by the Manager and the Corporation set out in column 2 shall pay operational surcharges in the amount set out in column 3, prorated on a per-lock basis.
( b ) If surcharges are postponed for operational or climatic reasons, a vessel that reports for its final transit of the Seaway from a place set out in column 1 within a period after the clearance date established by the Manager and the Corporation set out in column 2 shall pay operational surcharges in the amount set out in column 3, prorated on a per-lock basis.
( c ) A vessel that is authorized to transit the Seaway after the period of 96 hours after the clearance date established by the Manager and the Corporation shall pay, in addition to the operational surcharge, an amount equal to the incremental expenses incurred by the Manager to keep the Seaway open for the transit of the vessel.
[66 FR 15329, Mar. 16, 2001. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 10680, Mar. 12, 2009, and further redesignated at 79 FR 13253, Mar. 10, 2014, and further redesignated and amended at 81 FR 14391, Mar. 17, 2016; 84 FR 8985, Mar. 13, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.704 Safety Zone: Savannah River, Savannah, Georgia. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a safety zone: Two hundred foot radius around Garden City Terminal, approximate position 32 degrees 8 minutes, N, 81 degrees 9.5 minutes W, and around all cargo ships loaded with military equipment and transiting the Savannah River.
( b ) *Enforcement date.* This regulation was enforceable beginning at 12 p.m. on December 14, 1990.
( c ) *Regulation.* In accordance with the general regulations in § 165.23, entry into the zone is subject to the following requirements. ( 1 ) All persons and vessels in the vicinity of the safety zone shall immediately obey any direction or order of the Captain of the Port or a representative of the Captain of the Port.
( 2 ) The “representative of the Captain of the Port” is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Savannah, GA to act on his behalf. A representative of the Captain of the Port may be contacted on board any Coast Guard vessel assigned to enforce the safety zone.
( 3 ) Before entering the safety zone, a vessel operator shall contact the Captain of the Port or a representative of the Captain of the Port to determine what restrictions, if any, have been imposed on vessels in the safety zone. The Captain of the Port may be contacted by telephone via the Command Duty Officer at 912-652-4353. Coast Guard vessels assisting in the enforcement of the safety zone may be contacted on VHF-FM channels 13 or 16, or vessel operators may determine restrictions in effect for the safety zone by coming alongside a Coast Guard vessel patrolling the perimeter of the safety zone.
( 4 ) The Captain of the Port will issue a Marine Safety Information Broadcast Notice to Mariners to Notify the maritime community of the safety zone and restrictions imposed.
[USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35088, July 28, 2017]
§ 334.855 Salt River, Rolling Fork River, Otter Creek; U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Knox Military Reservation; Fort Knox, Kentucky; danger zone. ( a ) *The area.* Salt River from Point A (latitude 37°59′31.72′′ N; longitude 85°55′32.98′′ W) located approximately 1.2 miles southeast of West Point, Kentucky; southward to its confluence with the Rolling Fork River. Salt River from Point B (latitude 37°57′51.32′′ N; longitude 85°45′37.14′′ W) located approximately 2.8 miles southwest of Shepherdsville, Kentucky; southward to its confluence with the Rolling Fork River. Rolling Fork River from Point C (latitude 37°49′59.27′′ N; longitude 85°45′37.74′′ W) located approximately 1.6 miles southwest of Lebanon Junction, Kentucky northward to its confluence with the Salt River. Otter Creek from Point D (latitude 37°51′31.77′′ N; longitude 86°00′03.79′′ W) located approximately 3.4 miles north of Vine Grove, Kentucky to Point E (latitude 37°55′21.95′′ N; longitude 86°01′47.38′′ W) located approximately 2.3 miles southwest of Muldraugh.
( b ) *The regulation.* All persons, swimmers, vessels and other craft, except those vessels under the supervision or contract to local military or Army authority, vessels of the United States Coast Guard, and federal, local or state law enforcement vessels, are prohibited from entering the danger zones without permission from the Commanding General, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Knox Military Reservation, Fort Knox, Kentucky or his/her authorized representative.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulation in this section, promulgated by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, shall be enforced by the Commanding General, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Knox Military Reservation, Fort Knox, Kentucky and/or other persons or agencies as he/she may designate.
[70 FR 15228, Mar. 25, 2005]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages of Office Workers in Metalworking Industries, January 1945

              																	David, Lily Mary					 and 	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wages of Office Workers in Metalworking Industries, January 1945 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 886*,												Washington, D.C: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1946,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4341,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 337.8 Reports to higher echelons. ( a ) *Certain activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill material require action by the division engineer or Chief of Engineers.* Such reports should be prepared in the format described in paragraph (b) of this section. Reports may be necessary in the following situations: ( 1 ) When there is substantial doubt as to the authority, law, regulations, or policies applicable to the Federal project;
( 2 ) When higher authority requests the case be forwarded for decision;
( 3 ) When the state does not concur in a coastal zone consistency determination or attempts to concur with conditions or controls;
( 4 ) When the state denies or unreasonably delays a water quality certification or issues the certification with conditions or controls not related to maintenance or enforcement of state water quality standards or significantly exceeding the Federal standard;
( 5 ) When the regional administrator has advised the district engineer, pursuant to section 404(c) of the CWA, of his intent to prohibit or restrict the use of a specified discharge site; or notifies the district engineer that the discharge of dredged material in ocean waters or territorial seas will not comply with the criteria and restrictions on the use of the site established under the ODA; and the district engineer determines that the proposed disposal cannot be reasonably modified to alleviate the regional administrator's objections; and
( 6 ) When the state fails to grant water quality certification or a waiver of certification or concurrence or waiver of coastal zone consistency for emergency actions.
( b ) *Reports.* The report of the district engineer on a project requiring action by higher authority should be in letter form and contain the following information: ( 1 ) Justification showing the economic need for dredging.
( 2 ) The impact on states outside the project area if the project is not dredged.
( 3 ) The estimated cost of agency requirements which exceed those necessary in establishment of the Federal standard.
( 4 ) The relative urgency of dredging based on threat to national security, life or property.
( 5 ) Any other facts which will aid in determining whether to further defer the dredging and seek Congressional appropriations for the added expense or the need to exercise the authority of the Secretary of the Army to maintain navigation as provided by sections 511(a) and 404(t) of the CWA if the disagreement concerns water quality certification or other state permits.
( 6 ) If the disagreement concerns coastal zone consistency, the district engineer will follow the reporting requirement of this section and § 336.1(b)(9) of this chapter.
```

[House Report 111-119]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                            Rept. 111-119
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     Part 2

======================================================================

 
                    FAA REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2009

                                _______
                                

  May 21, 2009.--Committed to the Committee of the White House on the 
              State of the Union and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Oberstar, from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
                        submitted the following

                          SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

                        [To accompany H.R. 915]

    This supplemental report contains revisions to the material 
in the report submitted on May 19, 2009 (H. Rept. 111-119, part 
1). In lieu of the statement regarding compliance with House 
Rule XXI that was included in House Report 111-119, Part 1:

                     COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XXI

    Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House 
of Representatives, the Committee is required to include a list 
of congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited 
tariff benefits as defined in clause 9(d), 9(e), and 9(f) of 
rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives. It is 
not clear if the definition of ``congressional earmark'' under 
clause 9(d) of rule XXI applies to section 810 or section 815 
of H.R. 915. However, in the interest of full disclosure and 
transparency, the Committee has required Members of Congress to 
comply with all requirements of clause 9(d), 9(e), and 9(f) of 
rule XXI.
    Section 810, which was requested by Representative Steven 
C. LaTourette, allows Lake County, Ohio, to purchase the Lost 
Nation Airport from the City of Willoughby, Ohio. The provision 
authorizes the Secretary to make an AIP grant to assist in this 
purchase. Section 815, which was requested by Representative 
Don Young, allows the release of certain restrictions for 
specific airport land, without monetary consideration, to the 
town of Anchorage, Alaska, for construction or reconstruction 
of a federally subsidized highway project.
    No other provision in the bill includes an earmark, limited 
tax benefit, or limited tariff benefit.

                                  

```
ACME ELECTRIC CORPORATION
NEWS RELEASE
ANNOUNCES AN AGREEMENT TO SELL ITS AEROSPACE DIVISION


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                     ACME ELECTRIC ANNOUNCES AGREEMENT
TO SELL ITS AEROSPACE DIVISION
 


     EAST AURORA, N.Y., November 4, 1996 -- Acme Electric Corporation (NYSE:
ACE) today announced that it has entered into an agreement to sell the assets
of its Aerospace Division for approximately $6 million to Ultra Force Battery
Company, Inc., a newly formed subsidiary of B.A.T. International, Inc.  The
agreement also provides for the license of Acme's battery-related
technologies for the electric vehicle and other commercial markets.  Subject
to the satisfaction of certain contingencies, the closing is expected to
occur within 90 days.
     Founded in 1917, Acme Electric Corporation is a leader in the design and
manufacture of power conversion equipment for electronic and electrical
systems for industrial, commercial, residential, military and aerospace
applications.  Corporate headquarters are in East Aurora, N.Y., with
operations in Cuba, N.Y., Lumberton, N.C. and Tempe, Ariz.

                                  # # # #
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00112-CV

In the Interest of D.R.P., T.M.B., J.D.B., and M.A.R.B., Children

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-01835

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment 

is AFFIRMED. No costs on appeal are ordered because appellant qualifies as indigent. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 20.1.

SIGNED October 6, 2021.

________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
§ 154.525 Monitoring devices. The COTP may require the facility to install monitoring devices if the installation of monitoring devices at the facility would significantly limit the size of a discharge of oil or hazardous material and either: ( a ) The environmental sensitivity of the area requires added protection;
( b ) The products transferred at the facility pose a significant threat to the environment; or
( c ) The size or complexity of the transfer operation poses a significant potential for a discharge of oil or hazardous material.
[CGD 75-124, 45 FR 7172, Jan. 31, 1980, as amended by CGD 86-034, 55 FR 36253, Sept. 4, 1990]
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5111

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to treat

certain property boundaries as the boundaries of the Lawrence County

Airport, Courtland, Alabama, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2000

Mr. ADERHOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to treat certain property boundaries as the

boundaries of the Lawrence County Airport, Courtland,

Alabama, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAWRENCE COUNTY AIRPORT, COURTLAND,

4 ALABAMA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—With respect to the airport lo6 cated at Courtland, Lawrence County, Alabama (formerly

7 known as the George C. Wallace Airport), the Adminis8 trator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall treat
2

•HR 5111 IH

1 as the boundaries of the airport property those boundaries

2 shown on the airport layout drawing produced by Garver,

3 Inc., dated March 8, 1999, and approved by the Jackson

4 Airport District Office of the Administration.

5 (b) TREATMENT OF NONAIRPORT PROPERTY.—The

6 Administrator may not treat as airport property any real

7 property not designated as airport property in the drawing

8 referred to in subsection (a) regardless of whether such

9 real property was designated as airport property at any

10 time prior to March 8, 1999.

Æ
§ 386.6 Floodplain management. ( a ) In making WIFIA funding decisions under this part, the Corps will follow the requirements of Executive Order (E.O.) 11988, as amended by E.O. 13690, and Engineering Regulation (ER) 1165-2-26, “Implementation of E.O. 11988 on Floodplain Management”. Applicants shall submit information regarding the project that is sufficient for the Corps to determine that the project is in compliance with the requirements of E.O. 11988 and ER 1165-2-26.
( b ) Projects funded under this part will meet or exceed applicable State, local, Tribal, and territorial standards for flood risk and floodplain management, as well as E.O. 11988.
( c ) All projects under this part are considered Federal actions under E.O. 11988 and thus, project applicants shall determine whether the proposed project will occur in the floodplain. If the project is located within the floodplain, the applicant must determine whether the action is critical or not and what floodplain standard to follow. The Corps will implement the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS), where appropriate, which is a flood standard established by E.O. 13690, that aims to build a more resilient future through the encouragement of consideration of current and future risk when Federal investments are used to build or rebuild near floodplains. The Corps will ensure unwise uses are avoided, where possible, including the increase or transfer of flood risks, resulting in adverse impacts to human health, safety, welfare, property, natural resources, or functions of floodplains. Further guidance on implementation of E.O. 11988 can be found in the Corps ER 1165-2-26 (30 March 1984). Further information on FFRMS can be found at *https://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/Missions/Flood-Risk-Management/Flood-Risk-Management-Program/About-the-Program/Policy-and-Guidance/Federal-Flood-Risk-Management-Standard/ .*