alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 1 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 2 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 3 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 4 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 5 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 6 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 7 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 8 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 9 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 10 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 11 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 12 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 13 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 14 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 15 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 16 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 17 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 18 of 19
Case 9:22-cv-81334-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/30/2022 Page 19 of 19
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 112 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36715-36716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14618]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Johnson, Civil Action No. 00CV11014 (D. Mass.), was lodged with the 
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on May 
23, 2000. This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by 
the United States against William Johnson and Virginia Riley, pursuant 
to section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), and 
imposes civil penalties against the Defendants for discharging dredged 
or fill material and/or controlling and directing the discharge of 
dredged or fill material into waters of the United States at portions 
of an approximately 107 acre parcel of land located at 136 Holly Lane 
in Bridgewater, Massachusetts, where a cranberry farm now exists.
    The proposed Consent Decree prohibits the discharge of pollutants 
into the waters of the United States and requires the payment of civil 
penalties in the amount of $500.00 to be paid by Defendant Virginia A. 
Riley and

[[Page 36716]]

$1000.00 to be paid by Defendant William Johnson.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Please address comments to Jon M. 
Lipshultz, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Environmental 
Defense Section, U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 23986, 
Washington, D.C. 20026-3986 and refer to United States v. Johnson, DJ # 
90-5-1-1-05400/1.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 2300 
United States Courthouse, One Courthouse Way, Boston, MA 02210-3002.

Letitia J. Grishaw,
Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural Resources 
Division.
[FR Doc. 00-14618 Filed 6-8-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements Under OMB Review

AGENCY:  Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Notice of Reporting Requirements Submitted for OMB Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register notifying the public that the 
agency has made such a submission.

DATES:  Submit comments on or before March 21, 2000. If you intend to 
comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB 
Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.
    Copies: Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and 
other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the 
Agency Clearance Officer.

ADDRESSES:  Address all comments concerning this notice to: Agency 
Clearance Officer, Jacqueline White, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, S.W., 5th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20416; and OMB Reviewer, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Jacqueline White, Agency Clearance 
Officer, (202) 205-7044.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Disaster Declaration Governor's.
    Form No: N/A.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Description of Respondents: States requesting a Presidential 
Disaster Declaration.
    Annual Responses: 57.
    Annual Burden: 1,140.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 00-1437 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
| 1.   | Successful transition of current enterprise customers to National Accounts Manager |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Retain and grow all current content licensing partnerships |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Develop a plan to expand content license partnerships and channel sales for Onvia services |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | Acquire new content licensing partners in 2011 as quickly as possible |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1.   |  Bonus for successful transfer of enterprise customers measured by retention of 100% in bookings for these customers |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Bonus for renewing 100% in channel bookings from 2010 |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Graduated, accelerated commission on each dollar in channel bookings over plan |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Leadership","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ocSHalDI7p\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/leadership\/\">Leadership<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/cofo\/leadership\/embed\/#?secret=ocSHalDI7p\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Leadership” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"ocSHalDI7p\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
No. 333-115606, 333-132197 and 333-13543 on Form S-8 for Epic
Bancorp, of our report dated March 25, 2008 with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Epic Bancorp and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007
and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007
annual report on Form 10-K of Epic Bancorp.

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/
  Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP
|                                     
|Rancho
  Cucamonga, California       
|March 25,
  2008                     

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00384-CV

Kirsten Hanna; Upside Up Properties, LLC; and Upside Up Ventures, Inc., Appellants

v.

M. Matthew Williams; David Howell; Law Firm of M. Matthew Williams; and 

Leighton, Michaux, Adkinson & Brown, PLLC, Appellees

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-21-000957, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On December 3, 2021, we granted appellants’ unopposed motion to abate their 

appeal so that they could cure a “potential jurisdictional impediment” by having the trial 

court sever appellees’ counterclaim from the underlying proceeding. See Hanna v. Williams, 

No. 03-21-00384-CV, 2021 WL 5750189, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 3, 2021, no pet.) (per 

curiam) (mem. op.). Appellants have now filed both a status report stating that the trial court 

denied their motion to sever and an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, we 

reinstate the appeal, grant appellants’ motion, and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.1(a).
2

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion

Filed: January 26, 2022
§ 164.37 Equipment: Vessels of 10,000 gross tons or more. ( a ) Each vessel of 10,000 gross tons or more must have, in addition to the radar system under § 164.35(a), a second marine radar system that operates independently of the first. Note:
Independent operation means two completely separate systems, from separate branch power supply circuits or distribution panels to antennas, so that failure of any component of one system will not render the other system inoperative.
( b ) On each tanker of 10,000 gross tons or more that is subject to 46 U.S.C. 3708, the dual radar system required by this part must have a short range capability and a long range capability; and each radar must have true north features consisting of a display that is stabilized in azimuth.
(Titles I and II, 86 Stat. 426, 427 (46 U.S.C. 391(a), 70004; 49 CFR 1.46(n)(4))
[CGD 77-016, 43 FR 32112, July 24, 1978, as amended by CGD 79-033, 44 FR 26741, May 7, 1979; CGD 79-033, 47 FR 34389, Aug. 9, 1982; USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35532, June 30, 1998; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58280, Sept. 18, 2020]
#### § 183.507 General.

Each fuel system component on a boat to which this subpart applies must meet the requirements of this subpart unless the component is part of an outboard engine or is part of portable equipment.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00556-CV

In re Courtenay Brandt

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Pemberton, Goodwin and Field

Filed: September 27, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

      ( print page 36132)    
Take notice that the format of the notice issued pursuant to section 3(a) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, 5 U.S.C. 552b, is being revised to reflect the new organizational structure of the Commission's technical offices.

Consent agenda items from the Commission's Office of Markets, Tariffs, and Rates will be listed first as CAE- and CAG-items (for electric and gas, respectively) followed by consent agenda items from the Commission's Office of Projects listed as CAH- and CAC-items (for hydro and certificate, respectively). Regular agenda items will be listed in the following order: H-, C-, ­M-, E-, and G- (for hydro, certificate, miscellaneous, electric, and gas, and items, respectively).

The new format will be used for the first meeting in June. Accordingly, the Sunshine Act Notice will be issued under this format on June 7, 2000.

In addition, beginning on June 7, 2000, the Sunshine Act Notice will be available in the HTML format on the day of issuance to all interested persons on the Commission's Internet Web-Site at the following locations: Daily Notices, Commission Meeting Information, and Office of the Secretary.

David P. Boergers,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 00-14225  Filed 6-6-00; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
§ 154.1070 Deficiencies. ( a ) The cognizant COTP will notify the facility owner or operator in writing of any deficiencies noted during review of a response plan, drills observed by the Coast Guard, or inspection of equipment or records maintained in connection with this subpart.
( b ) Deficiencies shall be corrected within the time period specified in the written notice provided by the COTP. The facility owner or operator who disagrees with a deficiency issued by the COTP may appeal the deficiency to the cognizant COTP within 7 days or the time specified by the COTP to correct the deficiency, whichever is less. This time commences from the date of receipt of the COTP notice. The owner or operator may request a stay from the COTP decision pending appeal in accordance with § 154.1075.
( c ) If the facility owner or operator fails to correct any deficiencies or submit a written appeal, the COTP may invoke the provisions of § 154.1025 prohibiting the facility from storing, handling, or transporting oil.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 108 (Monday, June 5, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-14009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of Citizen Advocacy Panel, So. Florida District

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the South Florida District Citizen Advocacy 
Panel will be held in Stuart, Florida.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, June 23, 2000 and Saturday, 
June 24, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Ferree at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7974.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a Public meeting of the Citizen Advocacy Panel will be held 
Friday, June 23, 2000, 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. and Saturday, June 24, 2000, 9 
a.m. to Noon at the Stuart/Martin County Chamber of Commerce, 1650 
South Kanner Highway, Stuart, FL 34994. For more information contact 
Nancy Ferree at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7974. The public is invited 
to make oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 10 
minutes. If you would like to have the CAP consider a written 
statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7974, or write Nancy 
Ferree, CAP Office, 7771 W. Oakland Park Blvd #225, Sunrise, FL, 33351. 
Due to limited space, notification of intent to attend the meeting must 
be made with Nancy Ferree. Ms. Ferree can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 
or 954-423-7973. In accordance with the American's With Disabilities 
Act, persons with special needs should call Nancy Ferree at 954-423-
7973 to inform us of those needs by no later than June 16, 2000. The 
Agenda will include the following: various IRS issues.

    Note: Last minute changes to the agenda are possible and could 
prevent effective advance notice.


    Dated: May 25, 2000.
M. Cathy Vanhorn,
Director, CAP, Communications and Liaison.
[FR Doc. 00-14009 Filed 6-2-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 334.1270 Port Townsend, Indian Island, Walan Point; naval restricted area. ( a ) *The area.* The waters of Port Townsend Bay bounded by a line commencing on the north shore of Walan Point at latitude 48°04′42′′ North, longitude 122°44′30′′ West (Point A); thence to latitude 48°04′50′′ North, longitude 122°44′38′′ West (Point B); thence to latitude 48°04′52′′ North, longitude 122°44′57′′ West (Point C); thence to latitude 48°04′44′′ North, longitude 122°45′12′′ West (Point D); thence to latitude 48°04′26′′ North, longitude 122°45′21′′ West (Point E); thence to latitude 48°04′10′′ North, longitude 122°45′15′′ West (Point F); thence to latitude 48°04′07′′ North, longitude 122°44′49′′ West (Point G); thence to a point on the Walan Point shoreline at latitude 48°04′16′′ North, longitude 122°44′37′′ West (Point H).
( b ) *The regulations.* This area is for the exclusive use of the U.S. Navy. No person, vessel, craft, article or thing shall enter the area without permission from the enforcing agency. The restriction shall apply during periods when ship loading and/or pier operations preclude safe entry. The periods will be identified by flying a red flag from the ship and/or pier.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulation in this section shall be enforced by Commander, Navy Region Northwest and such agencies and persons as he/she shall designate.
[73 FR 78634, Dec. 23, 2008]
The Honorable Danny C. Reeves, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, *

sitting by designation.

-1-

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 06a0895n.06

Filed: December 14, 2006

No. 06-3019

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

BRADLEY T. SMITH,

CONTINENTAL MIDWEST

FINANCIAL, INC., SCIOTO

NATIONAL, INC.,

BANCSHAREHOLDERS OF

AMERICA, INC., and BANCSHARE

INVESTORS BROKERAGE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Before: DAUGHTREY and MCKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; and REEVES, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)

brought this action against the Defendants-Appellants, Bradley T. Smith (“Smith”), Continental

Midwest Financial, Inc. (“Continental”), and Scioto National, Inc. (“Scioto”), and the relief
-2-

Defendants-Appellants, Bancshareholders of America, Inc., and Bancshare Investors Brokerage,

Inc., for alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

in connection with two private offerings of Continental and Scioto’s common stock. The district

court granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against the Defendants, finding that

Smith, Scioto and Continental acted with the requisite scienter in making misrepresentations of

material facts in violation of Section 17(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The district court also granted

summary judgment against Smith under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, finding

that he was liable as a control person for Continental and Scioto’s violations of the Securities

Exchange Act. 

After a careful review of the record, the parties’ briefs, counsels’ arguments, and the

applicable law, we conclude that the district court correctly determined that the SEC was entitled

to summary judgment on its claims. Because the district court’s opinion accurately sets out the

law governing these issues and clearly states the reasons for its conclusions, issuance of a more

lengthy opinion in this case would not serve a useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons

stated in the district court’s opinion, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2010-0351, 75 FR 36284, June 25, 2010.

§ 150.517 How are weight tests supervised? ( a ) The installation and periodic tests required by §§ 150.515 and 150.516 of this subpart must be supervised by a person familiar with lifeboats, davit-launched liferafts, rescue boats, and with the test procedures under those sections.
( b ) The person supervising the tests must attest, in writing, that the tests have been performed according to Coast Guard regulations. The operator must keep a copy of the supervisor's attesting statement on board the deepwater port, or in the operator's principal office in the case of an unmanned deepwater port, and make it available to the Sector Commander, or MSU Commander, with COTP and OCMI authority.
[USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651, Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39182, July 1, 2013]