alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 245.45 Abandonment. ( a ) *Establishing abandonment.* Abandonment is the surrendering of all rights to a vessel (or similar obstruction) and its cargo by the owner, or owners if vessel and cargo are separately owned. In all cases other than emergency, abandonment will be established as a precondition to Corps removal, to avoid a “taking” of private property for public purposes. Abandonment is established by either: ( 1 ) Affirmative action on the part of the owner declaring intention to abandon, or
( 2 ) Failure to commence immediate removal of the obstruction and prosecute such removal diligently.
( b ) *Owner declaration.* The Corps of Engineers will not “accept” a notice of abandonment. Any notice of abandonment received by the Corps of Engineers will be acknowledged only, and will stand by itself as a declaration. Abandonment by the operator or lessee alone does not constitute abandonment.
( c ) *Non-diligence.* The determination of whether removal is commenced immediately and prosecuted diligently will be made by the District Engineer based on the degree of hazard to navigation, the difficulty and complexity of the removal operation, and the appropriateness of the removal effort. When no removal actions are being undertaken and the District Engineer is unable to identify the owner through investigation or 30 days of public notice, abandonment is presumed.
( d ) *Cargo.* If vessel and cargo are separately owned, or ownership of cargo is uncertain, abandonment of vessel and cargo will be established separately.
( e ) *Later claims.* After abandonment is established, the owner may no longer undertake removal or make any claim upon the vessel (or other obstruction) or its cargo, unless expressly permitted by the District Engineer.
( f ) *Continuing owner liability.* The abandonment of a wreck or other obstruction does not remove the owner's liability for the cost of removal and disposal if removal is undertaken by the Corps of Engineers, except in cases of nonnegligent sinking which occurred prior to November 17, 1986.
Editorial Note on Part 165
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 165 appear by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36328, 36329, July 2, 2007 and by USCG-2018-1049, 84 FR 7813, Mar. 5, 2019.

§ 165.1343 Regulated navigation area; NW Natural PGM Site, Willamette River, Portland, OR. ( a ) *Location.* The following area is a regulated navigation area (RNA): All navigable waters of the Willamette River adjacent to the NW Natural Portland Gas Manufacturing (PGM) site, encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning at 45°31′33.8′′ N, 122°40′11.6′′ W; thence to 45°31′33.9′′ N, 122°40′11.2′′ W; thence to 45°31′32.7′′ N, 122°40′10.7′′ W; thence to 45°31′32.9′′ N, 122°40′09.4′′ W; thence to 45°31′32.2′′ N, 122°40′08.8′′ W; thence to 45°31′32.2′′ N, 122°40′07.9′′ W; thence to 45°31′31.4′′ N, 122°40′07.6′′ W; thence to 45°31′30.9′′ N, 122°40′10.7′′ W; and along the shoreline back to the beginning point. These coordinates are based on North American Datum 83 (NAD 83). Geographically this location starts on the west bank of the Willamette River at approximately river mile 12.2, 100 yards south of the Steel Bridge.
( b ) *Regulations.* In addition to the general RNA regulations in § 165.13, the following regulations apply to the RNA described in paragraph (a) of this section. ( 1 ) Sediment disturbance activities including dredging, spudding, and vessel anchoring require advance consultation with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality and obtain prior approval from the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River (COTP) to prevent exposure of buried contamination and/or damage to the remedial cap. Contact Oregon DEQ at 503-229-5245, or alternatively, call 811 prior to any sediment disturbance activity. Any work within 10 feet of the seawall is prohibited unless there is advance consultation and approval by the City of Portland, DEQ and the COTP. All vessels and persons are prohibited from anchoring, dredging, laying cable, dragging, seining, bottom fishing, conducting salvage operations, or any other activity which could potentially disturb the riverbed in the designated area. Vessels may otherwise transit or navigate within this area.
( 2 ) The regulations described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section do not apply to vessels or persons engaged in activities associated with remediation efforts in the NW Natural PGM Site, provided that the COTP is given advance notice of those activities by Oregon DEQ.
( c ) *Contact information.* If you observe violations of the regulations in this section, you may notify the COTP by email, at *D13-SMB-MSUPortlandWWM@uscg.mil .*
[USCG-2020-0531, 87 FR 1356, Jan. 11, 2022]
#### § 164.42 Rate of turn indicator.

Each vessel of 100,000 gross tons or more constructed on or after September 1, 1984 shall be fitted with a rate of turn indicator.

[CGD 83-004, 49 FR 43468, Oct. 29, 1984]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Regeneration Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. Rose, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for, the
period covered by the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             |  |       |  |               
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----- |  | --------------
|/s/    THOMAS F. ROSE                                        |  | Date: |  | March 12, 2007
|Name: Thomas F. Rose                                         |  |       |  |               
|Title: Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |  |       |  |               



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 401.83 Reporting position at anchor, wharf, etc.

A vessel anchoring in a designated anchorage area, or elsewhere, and a vessel mooring at a wharf or dock, tying-up to a canal bank or being held on a canal bank in any manner shall immediately report its position to the traffic controller and it shall not resume its voyage without the traffic controller's permission.

[73 FR 9954, Feb. 25, 2008]
###### Editorial Note on Part 117

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 117 appear by USCG-1998-3799, 63 FR 35529, June 30, 1998.

#### § 117.444 Falgout Canal.

The draw of the LA 315 bridge across Falgout Canal, mile 3.1, shall open on signal; except that from 15 August to 5 June, the draw need not be opened from 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. and from 3 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday except holidays. The draw shall open on signal at any time for an emergency aboard a vessel.

[CGD8-91-11, 56 FR 43872, Sept. 5, 1991]
# Fourth Court o f Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

May 17, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00184

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.N., ET AL., CHILDREN

From the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- PA

- 01795 Honorable Peter A. Sakai , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Kristin M. Anderson’s request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record is GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due on or before May 27, 2021

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of May, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
524 P.2d 1062

#### J. T. ELLIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Eugene H. JONES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. 11434.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 18, 1974.

J. H. Felton, Lewiston, Warren Felton, Boise, for plaintiffs and appellants.

E. L. Miller, W. Baxter Brown, Philip E. Dolan, Coeur d’Alene, Edward John Crowley, Jr., Spokane, Wash., for defendants and respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellants granting them an easement over certain real property owned by defendants-respondents. The essence of this appeal is the assertion ■ by plaintiffs-appellants that the easement granted by the district court is not sufficient for their needs.

Dispositive of this case is the principle that findings of fact by the trial court when supported by substantial competent, although conflicting, evidence will not be disturbed on appeal. Hafer v. *91Horn, 95 Idaho 621, 515 P.2d 1013 (1973); Enders v. Wesley W. Hubbard and Sons, Inc., 95 Idaho 590, 513 P.2d 992 (1973).

The trial court found that it was not necessary to impress upon lot 7 the easement to the extent sought by plaintiffs since it would destroy the value of the lot for other purposes. The court also found that a less onerous easement as granted by the judgment of the trial court would provide any necessary access to the plaintiffs without “destroying the usability of the property to the defendants.” Such findings are supported by substantial competent, although conflicting, evidence and will not be disturbed.

The matter is remanded to the district court for its consideration of a correction of a clerical error in the judgment in the usage of the words “Cavanaugh Bay Addition.” As so amended, the judgment of the trial court and the order denying the motion for a new trial are affirmed. Costs to respondents.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Part I – Introduction to ADR","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CZTnsObAWq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/part1\/\">Part I – Introduction to ADR<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/part1\/embed\/#?secret=CZTnsObAWq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Part I – Introduction to ADR” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"CZTnsObAWq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 35391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-13861]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-930-1430-01; COC-28647]


Public Land Order No. 7448; Opening of Land Under Section 24 of 
the Federal Power Act; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order opens, subject to the provisions of section 24 of 
the Federal Power Act, 80 acres of National Forest System land 
withdrawn by a Secretarial order which established Bureau of Land 
Management Power Site Classification No. 361. This action will permit 
consummation of a pending Forest Service land exchange and retain the 
power rights to the United States. The land has been and will remain 
open to mineral leasing and, under the provisions of the Mining Claims 
Rights Restoration Act of 1955, to mining.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 3, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, BLM Colorado State 
Office, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7093; 303-239-
3706.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by the Act of June 10, 1920, section 24, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 818 
(1994), and pursuant to the determination of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission in DVCO-555-000, it is ordered as follows:
    1. At 9 a.m. on July 3, 2000, the following described National 
Forest System land withdrawn by the Secretarial Order dated October 24, 
1944, which established Power Site Classification No. 361, will be 
opened to disposal subject to the provisions of Section 24 of the 
Federal Power Act as specified by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission determination DVCO-555-000, and subject to valid existing 
rights, the provisions of existing withdrawals, other segregations of 
record, and the requirements of applicable law:

Sixth Principal Meridian

Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest

T. 6 N., R. 71 W.,
    Sec. 31, SW\1/4\NE\1/4\ and SE\1/4\NW\1/4\.

    The area described contains 80 acres in Larimer County.

    Dated: May 22, 2000.
Sylvia V. Baca,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 00-13861 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-U
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 30, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2440

Lower Tribunal No. 19-10064

________________

Herbert Jean,

Appellant,

vs.

Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, etc., et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Carlos Guzman, Judge.

Anthony V. Falzon, P.A., and Anthony V. Falzon, for appellant.

Greenberg Traurig, P.A., and Brigid F. Cech Samole, and Paul B. 

Ranis (Fort Lauderdale); Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Katherine M. 

Clemente (New York, NY), for appellees.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See MetroPCS Commc’ns, Inc. v. Porter, 273 So. 3d 1025, 

1027 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“We review the record for substantial, competent 

evidence to support the trial court’s findings of fact and consider de novo its 

conclusions of law.”); see also Ferrara v. Luxottica Retail, N. Am., Inc., 8:17-

CV-2914-T-33AEP, 2018 WL 573430, at *2-3 (M.D. Fla. Jan 26, 2018) 

(holding that an electronic signature is valid to enforce an agreement to 

arbitrate); Santos v. Gen. Dynamics Aviation Servs. Corp., 984 So. 2d 658, 

661 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding that an employee’s continued employment 

after receipt of an arbitration policy demonstrates his assent to its arbitration 

terms).
#### JAMES MORRISON, Administrator, etc., Respondent, *v.*THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made on a case and exceptions.

The action was brought to recover for an alleged negligent billing of the plaintiff’s intestate while crossing the track of the defendant. The principal question was whether or not the deceased had been guilty of contributory negligence. The General Term *held,*that *425the finding of the jury was conclusive upon this point, and affirmed the judgment.

*A. P. Laning,*for the appellant.

*E. C. Sprague,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Mullin, P. J.

Judgment and order affirmed.
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter's record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

Appellate Case Number: 14-15-00626-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1378310 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? I JY 1 ✓JN 

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y IIN 

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court 

reporters below. 

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter's record be prepared or N 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared? 

(4) Please select from the following options: 

A. The appellant has paid for the record. 

B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record 

C. The appellant is appealing as indigent. 

D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the 

record and is not appealing as indigent. 

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment) 

was unable to file the record in this appeal by . I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately pages. The record covers 

days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by . I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record. 

Additional Comments: 

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

/s/ BJ Orsack; 174th District Court; 1201 Franklin; Houston TX 77002 

bj_orsack@justex.net; 713.755.6324 

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/5/2015 1:31:56 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Memorandum of Understanding re Use of GSBCA Judges as ADR Neutrals","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MNc5XKad1B\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/gsbcamou\/\">Memorandum of Understanding re Use of GSBCA Judges as ADR Neutrals<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/gsbcamou\/embed\/#?secret=MNc5XKad1B\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Memorandum of Understanding re Use of GSBCA Judges as ADR Neutrals” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"MNc5XKad1B\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}