alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 175.201 Ventilation.

No person may operate a boat built after July 31, 1980, that has a gasoline engine for electrical generation, mechanical power, or propulsion unless it is equipped with an operable ventilation system that meets the requirements of 33 CFR 183.610 (a), (b), (d), (e), and (f) and 183.620(a).

[CGD 76-082, 44 FR 73027, Dec. 17, 1979]
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned officer of Acme United Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies
to my knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed a part of the Report or
“filed” for any purpose whatsoever.








By
            /s/  PAUL
      G. DRISCOLLPaul G.
      DriscollVice President
      andChief
      Financial Officer





Dated:  November
13, 2009














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Acme United Corporation and
will be retained by Acme United Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

---



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 333-59350, 333-31784, and 333-44822 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 14, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the change in accounting for goodwill upon adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for the year ended December 31, 2002, as discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Onvia.com, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.



/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Seattle, Washington

March 21, 2003
#### SCIENTIFIC ANGLERS, INC., Appellant, v. B. F. GLADDING & CO., Inc., Appellee.

No. 13484.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 5, 1958.

F. Norman Higgs, Bay City, Mich., (Laurence & Laurence, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellants.

Theodore E. Simonton, Cazenovia, N. Y. (Arthur J. Kinnane, Bay City, Mich., on the brief), for appellee.

Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Circuit Judge, and JONES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal in essence appears to be-based upon the refusal of the District Court to amend or to add to the mandate of this Court, 245 F.2d 722; 248 F.2d 483, and the decree entered by the-District Judge thereon and in compliance therewith.

There appears from the record to have-been considerable conflict between the parties following the hearing and decision of this Court in a prior appeal based' upon rights and duties under an exclusive license contract. The question of the conflict revolved around the alleged conduct of the appellee in declining or refusing to take advantage of the favorable judgment of this Court. We cannot, stop to review or recite the facts because-we think it unnecessary in the view we-take of the contest.

A District Court is not at liberty to amend, modify or add to the mandate-in a decided case by the Court of Appeals. It is its duty to enter the decree in the District Court as the mandate of this Court directs.

If the appellant here felt itself' aggrieved by the alleged vacillating conduct of the appellee the only procedure-open to the appellant was to file a motion for reconsideration, or a motion for modification or amendment of the mandate, or for a re-reference to the District Judge to take testimony and report. All' of the conflict thus could have been resolved in an orderly way and with greater-dispatch and less expense than by the method chosen by the appellant. Since appellant did not choose to follow the proper procedure, we must affirm the action of the District Judge and remand *663the case for his further proceeding in accordance with this Court’s mandate and his decree entered thereon and for such further relief as may to him seem proper.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C., 20549
 FORM
10-K/A
 (Amendment
No. 1)
 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2007
Commission File: 001-15849
 SANTANDER BANCORP
  
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
 Title of each class
    
    Name of each exchange on
which registeredCommon Stock, $2.50 par value
    
    New York Stock Exchange
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
 NONE
 þ o
 o þ
 þ o
 þ
  Large accelerated filer
o
    
    Accelerated filer þ
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
    
    Smaller reporting company o
 o þ
 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE




---



##### 



Explanatory Note
   PART IV
 ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES
  *
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description31.1
    
    Certification from the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200231.2
    
    Certification from the Chief Accounting Officer pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 *
    
    The Exhibit Index in Part IV, Item 15 and the exhibits
that were included in the Original Form 10-K have not been included herein.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  SANTANDER BANCORP
        (REGISTRANT)Dated: January 22, 2009
    By:
    /s/ JUAN
MORENO BLANCOPresident and Chief Executive Officer Dated: January 22, 2009
    By:
    /s/
ROBERTO JARAExecutive Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer  /s/ GONZALO DE LAS HERAS
    
    Chairman
    
    January 22, 2009/s/
JUAN MORENO BLANCO
    
    Vice Chairman
    
    January 22, 2009/s/ JESUS M. ZABALZA
    
    Director
    
    January 22, 2009/s/ VICTOR ARBULU
    
    Director
    
    January 22, 2009/s/ ROBERTO VALENTIN
    
    Director
    
    January 22, 2009/s/ STEPHEN FERRISS
    
    Director
    
    January 22, 2009/s/
JOSÉ R. GONZÁLEZ
    
    Director
    
    January 22, 2009/s/
MARÍA CALERO
    
    Director
    
    January 22, 2009
ACL Protection and Advocacy: Traumatic Brain Injury Awards for the States/Territories

FY 2017 Annual Allocation

State/Territory

Protection and 

Advocacy: 

Traumatic Brain 

Injury (PATBI)

Alabama $50,000

Alaska $50,000

Arizona $54,550

Arkansas $50,000

California $147,540

Colorado $50,603

Connecticut $50,000

Delaware $50,000

District of Columbia $50,000

Florida $93,233

Georgia $64,295

Hawaii $50,000

Idaho $50,000

Illinois $71,907

Indiana $53,950

Iowa $50,000

Kansas $50,000

Kentucky $50,000

Louisiana $50,000

Maine $50,000

Maryland $52,186

Massachusetts $54,453

Michigan $63,454

Minnesota $50,698

Mississippi $50,000

Missouri $52,408

Montana $50,000

Nebraska $50,000

Nevada $50,000

New Hampshire $50,000

New Jersey $60,679

New Mexico $50,000

New York $91,865

North Carolina $63,800

North Dakota $50,000

Ohio $68,320

Oklahoma $50,000

Oregon $50,000

Pennsylvania $71,741

Rhode Island $50,000

South Carolina $50,000

South Dakota $50,000

Tennessee $53,894

Texas $113,945

Utah $50,000

Vermont $50,000

Virginia $59,024

Washington $55,535

West Virginia $50,000

Wisconsin $51,509

Wyoming $50,000

American Samoa $20,000

Guam $20,000

Northern Mariana Islands $20,000

Puerto Rico $50,000

Virgin Islands $20,000

Native American Protection and Advocacy Inc. $20,000

TOTAL $3,099,589

6/7/2017
§ 20.1305 Admissibility and weight of entries from logbooks. ( a ) Any entry in any official logbook of a vessel concerning an offense enumerated in 46 U.S.C. 11501, made in substantial compliance with the procedural requirements of 46 U.S.C. 11502, is admissible in evidence and constitutes *prima facie* evidence of the facts recited.
( b ) Any entry in any such logbook made in substantial compliance with the procedural requirements of 46 U.S.C. 11502 may receive added weight from the ALJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of CECO Environmental Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phillip DeZwirek, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Phillip DeZwirek                                             
|Phillip DeZwirek                                                 
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer August 10, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CECO Environmental
Corp. and will be retained by CECO Environmental Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Mackay Island

National Wildlife Refuge

Mackay Island

National Wildlife Refuge

Comprehensive Conservation Plan Comprehensive Conservation Plan

USFWS Photo

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Mackay Island

 

National

 

Wildlife

 

Refuge

   Comprehensive Conservation Plan
dance for

ategies

sh and

ns detail

bove

ervice

e plans

ational

uisition.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-30472

Summary Calendar

 

JOSEPH C. JONES, d/b/a

MAKEDWDE PUBL’G

CO.; RON PUBL’G

CO.; RIC RECORDS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

JOSEPH S. RUFFINO, JR.,

Movant-Appellant,

versus

ALVIN LEE JOHNSON, SR.,

ET AL.,

Defendants,

and

PAUL M. LEE, SR. ET AL., 

Defendants-Appellees.

DALVA ONE STOP RECORDS & TAPES,

Movant-Appellee. 

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-91-879-B

- - - - - - - - - -

March 27, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Joseph C. Jones d/b/a Makedwde Publishing Co., Ron

Publishing Co., and Ric Records argues that the district court
No. 95-30472

- 2 -

erred in granting the defendants’ motions for summary judgment

and in denying Jones’ motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record, including the several orders

issued by the district court and the briefs of the parties, and

find that Jones has failed to raise an issue of arguable merit on

appeal. Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

IT IS ORDERED that Jones’ motion to strike the appellees’

brief and his request for the imposition of sanctions against the

defendants are DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of the defendants for the

imposition of sanctions and costs is GRANTED. The matter is

REMANDED to the district court for the determination of the

amount of sanctions to be imposed. Counsel for the moving

defendants are to submit affidavits to the district court stating

the time expended in defending the appeal and the motion to

strike their brief and a statement of the fees charged to their

clients. 

Appellant Joseph Ruffino, Jr., failed to sign the notice of

appeal. Therefore, his appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction. See Smith v. White, 857 F.2d 1042, 1043 (5th Cir.

1988).

APPEAL DISMISSED. REMANDED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Contributors","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ubihfiluKN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/contributors\/\">Contributors<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/contributors\/embed\/#?secret=ubihfiluKN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Contributors” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"ubihfiluKN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
#### § 20.3 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT G

Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 122-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2023 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 122-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2023 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 122-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2023 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:21-cv-23103-BB Document 122-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2023 Page 4 of 4
#### § 20.806 Official notice.

The ALJ may take official notice of such matters as could courts, or of other facts within the specialized knowledge of the Coast Guard as an expert body. When all or part of a decision rests on the official notice of a material fact not appearing in the evidence in the record, the decision must state as much; and any party, upon timely request, shall receive an opportunity to rebut the fact.
#### CHAUNCEY D. SMITH, Appellant, *v.*JOHN L. WILCOX, Respondent.

*Trover*— *Measure of damages.*

This action was in trover, the defendant being charged with wrongfully taking and detaining the plaintiff’s cow. The plaintiff claimed that the cow was dried up through the fault of the defendant while in his possession. Upon the trial a farmer, acquainted with the cow, was asked: “ How much less is she worth, being dried up, than she would be if giving milk ? ” *Held,*that the question was proper.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Onondaga , county, reversing a judgment of a Justice’s Court in favor of the plaintiff.

*S. N. Holmes,*for the appellant.

*E. S. Butterfield,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Morgan, J.

Present—Mullin, P. J., Smith and Morgan, JJ.

Judgment of County Court reversed, and that of Justice affirmed.
#### § 281.3 Postal inspector responsibilities.

The postal inspector investigating the incident should assure that the processing postal officials are fulfilling their notification responsibilities on a timely basis. Should the situation arise where no postal officials are involved in processing affected mail, then the investigating postal inspector will take necessary action to insure that appropriate notification is made.

[39 FR 20974, June 17, 1974]
#### A. A. Thomas v. James W. Long.

Filed June 6, 1894.

No. 5169.

Heview. This case involves questions of fact only, and the.'conclusion of the trial court being in accordance with the evidence, the judgment will not he disturbed.

Error from the district court of Blaine county. Tried below before, Harrison, J.

J. *D. Shamhart,*for plaintiff in error.

*M. B. Welch, contra.*

Post, J.

This action originated before a justice of the peace for Blaine county, from whence it was' taken by appeal to the *56district court. The subject of the controversy is a certain Winchester shot .gun of the alleged value of $20, which had been seized by the plaintiff in error, as sheriff, to satisfy an execution against the defendant in error. The latter recovered before the justice, and also in the district court, on the ground that the gun in controversy was exempt from execution under the provisions of section 521 of the Civil Code. There are no questions of law presented by the record. The questions of fact were fairly submitted to the trial court, and the conclusion reached being in accordance with the proofs, the judgment is

Affirmed. •

Harrison, J., took no part in the above decision.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Validian Corporation (the Corporation), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-KSB pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



Date:  April 5, 2006



By:  /s/ Bruce Benn

Bruce Benn

Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc.(the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|        |   | /s/ Jerry D. Williams                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Jerry D. Williams                      |
|   |   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date:  March 28,2007

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PeoplesCommunity Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
#### § 64.01 Purpose.

This part prescribes rules relating to the marking of structures, sunken vessels and other obstructions for the protection of maritime navigation.
#### § 238.1 Purpose.

This regulation provides policies and guidance for Corps of Engineers participation in urban flood damage reduction projects and establishes criteria to distinguish between improvements to be accomplished by the Corps under its flood control authorities and storm sewer systems to be accomplished by local interests.
[Reference]Ref1=http://mms-video.shs.net/asf1/3SAMHSA/06-0327PartnersInRecovery.wmv?MSWMExt=.asfRef2=http://10.10.90.241:80/asf1/3SAMHSA/06-0327PartnersInRecovery.wmv?MSWMExt=.asf
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned executiveofficer of Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereoffully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that the information containedtherein fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|                            |                             |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                            | PEOPLES COMMUNITY  BANCORP, INC. |
|                            |                             |   |
| Date:  April 30, 2009 | By:                              | /s/ Jerry D. Williams |
|                            |                             | Jerry D. Williams |
|                            |                             | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PeoplesCommunity Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----