alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 173.55 Report of casualty or accident. ( a ) The operator of a vessel shall submit the casualty or accident report prescribed in § 173.57 to the reporting authority prescribed in § 173.59 when, as a result of an occurrence that involves the vessel or its equipment: ( 1 ) A person dies;
( 2 ) A person is injured and requires medical treatment beyond first aid;
( 3 ) Damage to vessels and other property totals $2,000 or more or there is a complete loss of any vessel;
( 4 ) A person disappears from the vessel under circumstances that indicate death or injury.
( b ) A report required by this section must be made: ( 1 ) Within 48 hours of the occurrence if a person dies within 24 hours of the occurrence;
( 2 ) Within 48 hours of the occurrence if a person is injured and requires medical treatment beyond first aid, or disappears from a vessel; and
( 3 ) Within 10 days of the occurrence or death if an earlier report is not required by this paragraph.
( c ) When the operator of a vessel cannot submit the casualty or accident report required by paragraph (a) of this section, the owner shall submit the casualty or accident report.
[CGD 72-54R, 37 FR 21399, Oct. 7, 1972, as amended by CGD 76-155, 44 FR 5308, Jan. 25, 1979; CGD 82-015, 54 FR 5610, Feb. 6, 1989; USCG-1999-6094, 66 FR 21675, May 1, 2001; 66 FR 33845, June 26, 2001; USCG-1999-6094, 67 FR 14645, Mar. 27, 2002]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4831 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4831

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2339 North California Street in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Roberto 
                        Clemente Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2000

Mr. Gutierrez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2339 North California Street in Chicago, Illinois, as the ``Roberto 
                        Clemente Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2339 
North California Street in Chicago, Illinois, and known as the Logan 
Square Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Roberto 
Clemente Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roberto Clemente Post 
Office''.
                                 <all>
```
GAO/AIMD-00-221R Aviation Hall of Fame

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

Accounting and Information

Management Division

B-285321

June 16, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the Aviation Hall of Fame for 1997 and 1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the Aviation

Hall of Fame, a federally chartered corporation, for the years ended December 31, 1997 and

1998. The corporation’s purpose is to honor citizens, aviation leaders, pilots and others for

outstanding contributions to the establishment, development, advancement, or improvement

of aviation, and to perpetuate the memory of them and record their contributions.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the corporation’s

income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditor’s report and the corporation’s financial statements to the Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with the

financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we reviewed the

corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes, performed certain analytical

procedures related to information presented in the financial statements, reviewed the

auditor’s report, and made inquiries to corporation officials or the auditor as we deemed

necessary. We did not review the auditor’s working papers. Our review disclosed no

reportable instances of noncompliance.
B-285321

Page 2 GAO/AIMD-00-221R Aviation Hall of Fame

The audit report included the auditor’s opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with generally

accepted accounting principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

David L. Clark

Director, Audit Oversight and Liaison

w/o Enclosure

(911974)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                        THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                           OF ASIAINFO HOLDINGS, INC.


I, James Ding hereby certify that

1.     I am the Chief Executive Officer of AsiaInfo Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
       corporation (the "Corporation").

2.     Article FIFTH of the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation is hereby
       amended in its entirety as follows:

       "FIFTH: The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have
       authority to issue is 60,000,000 Common and Preferred shares; the total
       number of shares of Common Stock shall be 50,000,000 with par value of
       one cent ($.01) per share and the total number of shares of Preferred
       Stock shall be 10,000,000 with par value of one cent ($.01) per share."

3.     This Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the
       Corporation (the "Amendment") has been duly approved by the Board of
       Directors.

4.     This Amendment has been duly approved by the required vote of
       stockholders in accordance with Section 242 of the Delaware General
       Corporation Law. The number of shares voting in favor of the amendment
       equaled or exceeded the vote required. The percentage vote required was
       more than 50% of the outstanding Common Stock.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto sign my name and declare under
penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Delaware that the matters set
forth in this Amendment are true and correct to my knowledge.


                                            ASIAINFO HOLDINGS, INC.



                                            By: /s/ James Ding
                                               ---------------------------------
                                            Name: James Ding,
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
UM TED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTIIERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.22-20340rCR-m LLIAM S(s)

UM TED STATES OF AM ERICA

V.

OM ALISSK EO ,

M ASPHM UKRY,

JAM ESLAU,

DICK SON LAU,

SUNN Y CHAN

RAPH AEL CHEUNG M AN

SAR AH YEUNG ,and

IG G IP CHIJN G,

Defendants./

UNSEM M G ORDER

TheUnitedStatesofAmerica,having appliedtothisCourtfora!lOrdertmsealingthe

SupersedingJndictm entandarrestwarrantspreviouslysealedinthism atter,andtheCottrtfinding

good cause'.

IT ISTIEREBY ORDERED thattheClerk oftheCourtshalltmsealthefileinthism atler

and place the Superseding Indictm ent,arrestwarrants,and such otherdocum ents and Orders

relatedtothiscaseinthepublicrecord.

DONEA'N.DORDERED atMinmi,Florida,this /im dayofNovember2022.

r

X LISSADAMIAN

UNITED STATESM AGISTM TE JUDGB

cc: AUSA (W atts-FitzGerald)

Clerk oftheCourt

U.S.M arshalls

Case 1:22-cr-20340-KMW Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/16/2022 Page 1 of 1
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 0033 4

- CR

Kermit Antwoine Woods

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (14 29207 D)

October 27, 2016

Opini on by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF A PPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"ADR.gov","provider_url":"https:\/\/adr.gov","title":"Neutral Defined","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SCivT5oLW0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/24-definition\/\">Neutral Defined<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/adr.gov\/guidance\/adrguide-home\/24-definition\/embed\/#?secret=SCivT5oLW0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Neutral Defined” — ADR.gov\" data-secret=\"SCivT5oLW0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}
UN ITED STATES DISTR ICT CO URT

SOU TH ERN DISTR ICT OF FLO RTDA

CASE NO.22-80144-CR-SM ITH(s)(s)

U NITED STA TES OF A M ERICA,

Plaintiff,

VS.

JOFF STNN W R9Y PHILOSSAG T,

Defendant.

/

QUESTION/NOTEFROM THE

JURY TO THE COURT

l z-A>o. Z- A,J c. Qz.<j,u5

DATE:Z -? woz.

TIA4B:GL

lt- tN'

v..... x.. AFORE.PFDSON SIGNATURE--.-- .-.-.....

'

.. - .n . .--

. zrW .-..n...'

FOREPERSON PRW T

Case 9:22-cr-80144-RS Document 197 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2023 Page 1 of 1
ADR LUNCHTIME SERIES PRESENTATION

Employee Engagement –

When a Human Being Shows Up Instead!

Employee engagement is widely recognized by managers as a key driver of organizational 

performance, yet polls show widespread lack of engagement, or worse -- active 

disengagement! Research by The Culture Works, including surveys of over 850,000 working 

adults, has identified ways to: enhance employee engagement; align each employee’s work 

with the organization’s vision and strategy; build team unity; and help employees learn, grow 

and build career paths. This presentation will focus on an overview of the resulting What 

Motivates MeTM Engagement Training, then take a humorous look at meetings and how they 

affect employee engagement, and discuss a variety of additional ideas for employee 

engagement.

Speakers: Dr. Tom Holloway

Manager, Employee Safety & Health Services, FAA Technical Operations

Christine Sharp

Manager for Social Collaboration and Engagement, FAA Office of 

Communications

Presented by the Interagency ADR Working Group, Workplace Conflict 

Management Section in coordination with the Department of Energy’s Office of 

Conflict Prevention and Resolution

Date: Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Time: Noon - 1:30 pm EDT (Please allow extra time for security procedures)

Location: U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave, SW, Room GE-086

(DOE Forrestal Main Auditorium)

Washington, D.C. 20585

Travel by Metro: Green and Yellow Line - L'Enfant Plaza station (exit to 

Maryland Avenue) OR Orange and Blue Line - Smithsonian station (exit to 

Holocaust Museum/Bureau of Engraving and Printing).

If you plan to attend in person and you need any special accommodations, or if you plan to attend this 

training online and you need any special accommodations, please contact cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov

no later than January 14, 2017. 

To attend in person, everyone, including federal employees with an HSPD-12 government ID badge, 

must register by email to cindy.mazur@fema.dhs.gov and provide 1) name, 2) citizenship, and 3) 

agency/employer by January 17, 2017. You do not need to register to call-in or participate online. 

To attend via WebEx, Go to www.webex.com then click “Join.” Enter the Meeting Number 998 764 

266, your first and last name and your email address. Enter Adr1234 as the event password. Click 

“Join” and follow instructions for the audio (select the “I will call in” option for better reception).

To listen only via teleconference, please call 1-650-479-3208 and use access code: 998 764 266. Please

disregard the prompt for an Attendee ID by pressing # sign. To submit questions to the speaker during 

the program, please use online chat or email elisabeth.bissell@fema.dhs.gov. Materials for this 

presentation will be posted at http://www.adr.gov/events.html several days before the program.
§ 334.390 Atlantic Ocean south of entrance to Chesapeake Bay; firing range. ( a ) *The danger zone.* ( 1 ) A section extending seaward for a distance of 12,000 yards between two radial lines bearing 030° True and 083° True, respectively, from a point on shore at latitude 36°46′48′′ N, longitude 75°57′24′′ W; and an adjacent sector extending seaward for a distance of 15 nautical miles between two radial lines bearing 083° True and 150° True, respectively, from the same shore position. The datum for these coordinates is WGS-1984.
( b ) *The regulation.* ( 1 ) To accommodate ingress and egress within the southern approach to the Chesapeake Bay Federal navigation channels, no live fire exercise will take place within the area northeast of, and defined by a line intersecting points latitude 36°47′59′′ N, longitude 75°46′05′′ W and latitude 36°44′25′′ N, longitude 75°38′57′′ W, and this area is open to unrestricted surface navigation.
( 2 ) Within the remainder of the danger zone vessels shall proceed through the area with caution and shall remain therein no longer than necessary for the purpose of transit.
( 3 ) When firing is in progress during daylight hours, red flags will be displayed at conspicuous locations on the beach. When firing is in progress during periods of darkness, red flashing lights will be displayed from conspicuous locations on the beach which are visible from the water a minimum distance of four (4) nautical miles.
( 4 ) Firing on the ranges will be suspended as long as any vessel is within the danger zone.
( 5 ) Lookout posts will be manned by the activity or agency operating the firing range at the Naval Air Station Oceana, Dam Neck Annex, in Virginia Beach, Virginia. After darkness, night vision systems will be utilized by lookouts to aid in locating vessels transiting the area.
( 6 ) There shall be no firing on the range during periods of low visibility which would prevent the recognition of a vessel (to a distance of 7,500 yards) which is properly displaying navigation lights, or which would preclude a vessel from observing the red range flags or lights.
( 7 ) Throughout the entire danger zone anchoring, dredging, trawling and any bottom disturbing activities should be conducted with caution due to the potential of unexploded ordnance (UXO) and other munitions and explosives of concern (MEC) on the bottom.
( c ) *Enforcement.* The regulation in this section shall be enforced by the Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, Norfolk, Virginia, and such agencies as he or she may designate.
[84 FR 33850, July 16, 2019]
#### § 203.16 Federally recognized Indian Tribes and the Alaska Native Corporations.

Requests for Public Law 84-99 assistance on tribal lands held in trust by the United States, or on lands of the Alaska Natives, may be submitted to the Corps directly by the affected federally recognized Indian Tribe or Alaska Native Corporation, or through the appropriate regional representative of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or through the Governor of the State.
EXHIBIT
      32.1


STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Worlds.com, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
      Kidrin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Thomas
      Kidrin


Thomas
      Kidrin


Chief
      Executive Officer








Date:
      March 4, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
****

****

# Common Choice Foods vs. Nutrient Dense Foods*

**Ingredients**

*Cultural and participant preferences should remain a priority during the menu creation process

# Common Choice Foods vs. Nutrient Dense Foods*

**Recipes**

**Cultural and participant preferences should remain a priority during the menu creation process*

2

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg
#### § 183.701 Applicability.

This subpart applies to outboard motors and starting controls, and to manufacturers, distributors or dealers installing such equipment.

[USCG-1999-5832, 64 FR 34716, June 29, 1999]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adams Resources & Energy,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 (the
"Report"), I, Richard B. Abshire, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard B. Abshire
-----------------------------------
Richard B. Abshire
Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2004

                                     - 34 -
§ 147.863 Turritella FPSO System Safety Zone. ( a ) *Description.* The Turritella, a Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) system is to be installed in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico at Walker Ridge 551. The FPSO can swing in a 360 degree arc around the center point of the turret buoy's swing circle at 26°25′38.74′′ N., 90°48′45.34′′ W., and the area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) around the stern of the FPSO when it is moored to the turret buoy is a safety zone. If the FPSO detaches from the turret buoy, the area within 500 meters (1640.4 feet) around the center point at 26°25′38.74′′ N., 90°48′45.34′′ W. is a safety zone.
( b ) *Regulation.* No vessel may enter or remain in this safety zone except the following: ( 1 ) An attending vessel;
( 2 ) A vessel under 100 feet in length overall not engaged in towing; or
( 3 ) A vessel authorized by the Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[USCG-2015-0318, 80 FR 71942, Nov. 18, 2015]
1 The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United St ates District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2306

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Thomas Frederick Mills, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 27, 2007 Filed: May 1, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Thomas Frederick Mills appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to escape from a federal correctional institution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a), and theft of government property, in violation of 18 U.S .C. § 641. For revers al, Mills argues the district court 1 erred in concluding that his escap e conviction was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2), resulting in hi s classification as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1.-2- As Mills acknowledges, this court has held that all escapes, even non-violent “walk-away” escapes, are crim es of violence within the meaning of section 4B1.2. See United States v. Nation , 243 F.3d 467, 472 (8th Cir. 2001). We are bound to follow this precedent. See UnitedStates v. Wright , 22 F.3d 787, 788 (8th Cir. 1994) (panel of this court is bound by prior Eighth Circuit decision unless prior decision is overruled by this court sitting en banc). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### § 144.20-1 Applicability.

This subpart applies to each MODU operating on the OCS that is not inspected under 46 CFR subchapter I-A.

[CGD 82-075b, 49 FR 4377, Feb. 6, 1984]