alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 14 (Friday, January 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Page 3470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-1420]

[[Page 3470]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research 
Committee.
    Date: March 6-8, 2000.
    Open: March 6, 2000, 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM.
    Agenda: Open for discussion of administrative details relating 
to committee business and program review.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, Somerset Room, 5520 Wisconsin 
Ave., Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Closed: March 6, 2000, 10:00 AM to adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, Somerset Room, 5520 Wisconsin 
Ave., Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Gary S. Madonna, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID, NIH, Room 2217, 6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7610, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7610, 301-496-2550.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 12, 2000.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 00-1420 Filed 1-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
§ 20.1207 Pre-hearing conferences. ( a ) *When held.* As early as practicable, the ALJ shall order and conduct a pre-hearing conference. He or she may order the holding of the conference in person, or by telephonic or electronic means.
( b ) *Answer.* The respondent shall enter his or her answer at the pre-hearing conference. If the answer is an admission, the ALJ shall either issue an appropriate order or schedule a hearing on the order.
( c ) *Content.* ( 1 ) At the pre-hearing conference, the parties shall: ( i ) Identify and simplify the issues in dispute and prepare an agreed statement of issues, facts, and defenses.
( ii ) Establish a simplified procedure appropriate to the matter.
( iii ) Fix a time and place for the hearing 30 days or less after the temporary suspension.
( iv ) Discuss witnesses and exhibits.
( 2 ) The ALJ shall issue an order directing the exchange of witness lists and documents.
( d ) *Order.* Before the close of the pre-hearing conference, the ALJ shall issue an order setting forth any agreements reached by the parties. The order must specify the issues for the parties to address at the hearing.
( e ) *Procedures not to cause delay.* Neither any filing of pleadings or motions, nor any conduct of discovery, may interfere with— ( 1 ) The holding of the hearing 30 days or less after the temporary suspension or
( 2 ) The closing of the record early enough for the issuance of an initial decision 45 days or less after the temporary suspension.
( f ) *Times.* The ALJ may shorten the time for any act required or permitted under this subpart to enable him or her to issue an initial decision 45 days or less after the temporary suspension.
#### § 20.1313 Medical examination of respondents.

In any proceeding in which the physical or mental condition of the respondent is relevant, the ALJ may order him or her to undergo a medical examination. Any examination ordered by the ALJ is conducted, at Federal expense, by a physician designated by the ALJ. If the respondent fails or refuses to undergo any such examination, the failure or refusal receives due weight and may be sufficient for the ALJ to infer that the results would have been adverse to the respondent.
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 427I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 427I |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 62ό έτος19 Δεκεμβρίου 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 427I

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

62ό έτος19 Δεκεμβρίου 2019

---

| Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Γνωστοποιήσεις |
| | ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ |
| | Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή |
| 2019/C 427 I/01 | Πρόσκληση υποβολής υποψηφιοτήτων για το Βραβείο Jan Amos Comenius για διδασκαλία υψηλής ποιότητας σχετικά με την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση | 1 |

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

V   Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή

2019/C 427 I/01

Πρόσκληση υποβολής υποψηφιοτήτων για το Βραβείο Jan Amos Comenius για διδασκαλία υψηλής ποιότητας σχετικά με την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

V Γνωστοποιήσεις

ΔΙΟΙΚΗΤΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ

Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή

| 19.12.2019 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CI 427/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2019

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CI 427/1

---

Πρόσκληση υποβολής υποψηφιοτήτων

για το Βραβείο «Jan Amos Comenius για διδασκαλία υψηλής ποιότητας σχετικά με την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση»

(2019/C 427 I/01)

Η Γενική Διεύθυνση Εκπαίδευσης, Νεολαίας, Αθλητισμού και Πολιτισμού της Ευρωπαϊκής Επιτροπής δημοσίευσε πρόσκληση υποβολής υποψηφιοτήτων για το «Βραβείο Jan Amos Comenius για διδασκαλία υψηλής ποιότητας σχετικά με την Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση».

Tο βραβείο θα επιβραβεύει τα σχολεία της δευτεροβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης που βοηθούν τους μαθητές τους να μάθουν για την ΕΕ με τρόπο που εμπνέει. Θα παρέχει αναγνώριση και προβολή αυτής της δουλειάς σε επίπεδο ΕΕ σε κάθε κράτος μέλος και θα τονίσει τη σημασία της διδασκαλίας και της μάθησης σχετικά με την ΕΕ σε νεαρή ηλικία. Θα αναδείξει συναρπαστικές μεθόδους διδασκαλίας που ενθαρρύνουν ενεργά τους μαθητές να αποκτούν γνώσεις σχετικά με την ΕΕ και θα συμβάλει στη διάδοση αυτών των πρακτικών.

Η πρόσκληση υποβολής υποψηφιοτήτων απευθύνεται σε σχολεία δευτεροβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης που είναι εγκατεστημένα και εδρεύουν στην Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση (όχι σε μεμονωμένους εκπαιδευτικούς).

Με τον διαγωνισμό αυτόν θα απονεμηθούν έως είκοσι οκτώ (28) βραβεία ύψους 8.000 EUR έκαστο, ένα για κάθε κράτος μέλος της ΕΕ.

Αν το Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο αποχωρήσει από την ΕΕ πριν από την απόφαση χορήγησης (η εν λόγω απόφαση εκδίδεται σύντομα μετά την αξιολόγηση των αιτήσεων) χωρίς συμφωνία που να διασφαλίζει ότι οι αιτούντες στο Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο εξακολουθούν να είναι επιλέξιμοι, τα βρετανικά σχολεία δευτεροβάθμιας εκπαίδευσης θα παύσουν να είναι επιλέξιμα για το εν λόγω βραβείο. Στην περίπτωση αυτή, ο μέγιστος αριθμός των βραβείων θα είναι 27 (αντί για 28), αλλά το ποσό ανά βραβείο θα παραμείνει το ίδιο (8.000 EUR).

Η προθεσμία υποβολής αιτήσεων λήγει στις 17: 00 (ώρα Κεντρικής Ευρώπης) την Πέμπτη 6 Φεβρουαρίου 2020.

Όλες οι σχετικές πληροφορίες και τα έντυπα αίτησης είναι διαθέσιμα στην ηλεκτρονική διεύθυνση:

https://ec.europa.eu/education/resources-and-tools/funding-opportunities/jan-amos-comenius-prize_el

---
#### Pinkston *v.*The State.

Submitted December 17, 1906,

Decided January 15, 1907.

Indictment for vagrancy. Before Judge Little. City court of Sparta. October 20, 1906.

*B. H. Lewis,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. W. Moore, solicitor,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

Tlie only ground of error urged being that the verdict was. not supported by the evidence, and the evidence, though conflicting, being sufficient to warrant a conviction, there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J.,*absent.
§ 207.580 Buffalo Harbor, N.Y.; use, administration, and navigation. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) No vessel shall moor or anchor to any structure of the United States without the consent of the District Engineer, U.S. Army, in charge of the locality, or his authorized agent.
( d ) No vessel shall moor or anchor in or along any improved channel or basin in such manner as to interfere with improvement or maintenance operations therein. Whenever in the opinion of the District Engineer any vessel is so moored or anchored, the owner thereof shall cause said vessel to be moved upon notification from and within the time specified by said District Engineer.
[Regs., May 5, 1938, as amended at 25 FR 8908, Sept. 16, 1960; 42 FR 57962, Nov. 7, 1977]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4955 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4955

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow States to regulate tow 
                           truck operations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2000

Mr. Moran of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow States to regulate tow 
                           truck operations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 
14501(c)(2)(C) is amended by striking ``the price of'' and all that 
follows through ``transportation is'' and inserting ``regulation of tow 
truck operations whether or not such operations are''.
                                 <all>
```
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 5075

To provide for the conveyance of certain real property at the Carl Vinson

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. NORWOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To provide for the conveyance of certain real property at

the Carl Vinson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical

Center, Dublin, Georgia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AT THE

4 CARL VINSON DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

5 AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, DUBLIN, GEOR6 GIA.

7 (a) CONVEYANCE TO STATE BOARD OF REGENTS.—

8 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall convey, without

9 consideration, to the Board of Regents of the State of

10 Georgia all right, title, and interest of the United States
2

•HR 5075 IH

1 in and to two tracts of real property, including any im2 provements thereon, at the Carl Vinson Department of

3 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dublin, Georgia, con4 sisting of 39 acres, more or less, in Laurens County, Geor5 gia.

6 (b) CONVEYANCE TO COMMUNITY SERVICE BOARD

7 OF MIDDLE GEORGIA.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs

8 shall convey, without consideration, to the Community

9 Service Board of Middle Georgia all right, title, and inter10 est of the United States in and to three tracts of real prop11 erty, including any improvements thereon, at the Carl Vin12 son Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dub13 lin, Georgia, consisting of 58 acres, more or less, in

14 Laurens County, Georgia.

15 (c) CONDITIONS ON CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance

16 under subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that

17 the real property conveyed under that subsection be used

18 in perpetuity solely for education purposes. The convey19 ance under subsection (b) shall be subject to the condition

20 that the real property conveyed under that subsection be

21 used in perpetuity solely for education and health care

22 purposes.

23 (d) SURVEY.—The exact acreage and legal descrip24 tion of the real property to be conveyed under this section

25 shall be determined by a survey or surveys satisfactory to
3

•HR 5075 IH

1 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. The cost of any such

2 survey shall not be borne by the Secretary.

3 (e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The

4 Secretary of Veterans Affairs may require such additional

5 terms and conditions in connection with the conveyances

6 under this section as the Secretary considers appropriate

7 to protect the interests of the United States.

Æ
525 P.2d 956

#### John J. DAHL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The STATE TAX COMMISSION of the State of Idaho et al., Defendants-Respondents.

No. 11515.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 26, 1974.

Michael E. McNichols, Orofino, for plaintiff-appellant.

W. Anthony Park, Atty. Gen., William McDougall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Boise, for defendants-respondents.

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant Dahl is a widower. Following the death of his wife he filed a transfer and inheritance tax return upon which the Tax Commission assessed a deficiency. The deficiency was assessed and determined on the basis that Dahl was not entitled to an exemption under the provisions of I.C. § 14 — 408. That statute provides an exemption of $10,000 “to the widow or to a minor child of the decedent” but to other persons (including the plaintiff-appellant herein) an exemption of only $4,000.

Plaintiff-appellant has asserted in the lower court and here that the provisions of I.C. § 14 — 408 are violative of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution in that the statute affords different treatment to persons solely on the basis of their sex and thus establishes a classification subject to scrutiny under the equal protection clause. In short, since appellant is a widower rather than a widow he suffers a loss of $6,000 worth of exemptions and such loss results solely from his sex. *See*Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71, 92 S.Ct. 251, 30 L.Ed.2d 225 (1971). The trial court upon appropriate motion granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant-respondent herein and upheld the constitutionality of the statute in question.

Implicit in the position of both parties is that the case of Kahn v. Shevin, -U.S. -, 94 S.Ct. 1734, 40 L.Ed.2d 189 (1974) is determinative of the result to be reached herein. That case was pending at the time of the determination of this matter by the district court but since that time the decision has issued and is contrary to the position of plaintiff-appellant herein.

In *Kahn*the same type of acts and statutes were presented and the arguments were analogous to those in the case at bar. The court in *Kahn*held that Florida’s differing treatment as between widows and widowers in the granting of tax exemptions did not constitute a denial of equal protection and thus was not violative of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution in that:

> “There can be no dispute that the financial difficulties confronting the lone woman in Florida or in any other State exceed those facing the man

> *175The disparity is likely to be exacerbated for the widow * * * ”

While we might well disagree as to whether or not facts sustain such judicial knowledge by the United States Supreme Court, and while such language is passing strange in contrast with the previous language of that court in Reed v. Reed, *supra,*nevertheless the decision in *Kahn*is binding, conclusive and dispositive of plaintiff-appellant’s argument in the case at bar.

Affirmed. Costs to Respondents.

DONALDSON, McQUADE, Mc-FADDEN and BAKES, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Validian Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andre Maisonneuve,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or (15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The Information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Andre Maisonneuve
---------------------
Andre Maisonneuve
Chief Financial Officer

April 10, 2003
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP            

                                                       EXHIBIT 15(a)












May 10, 1999


Alabama Power Company
600 North 18th Street
Birmingham, Alabama  35291



Ladies and Gentlemen:

We are aware that Alabama Power Company has incorporated by reference in
Registration Statement 333-67453 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
1999 which includes our report on Alabama Power Company dated May 10, 1999
covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant
to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), such report is not
considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by our
firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

Very truly yours,


/s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIGUO ZHANG,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71689

Agency No. A089-776-528

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2014** 

Before: LEAVY, FISHER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Liguo Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal,

and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

NOV 26 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034,

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review. 

Zhang’s only challenge to the agency’s adverse credibility determination is

his contention that the agency did not adequately consider his explanations for

three inconsistencies. We reject Zhang’s contention, where the BIA considered

Zhang’s argument that the IJ failed to adequately address his explanations, rejected

Zhang’s argument, and upheld the IJ’s adverse credibility determination under the

totality of the circumstances. Further, the agency was not compelled to accept

Zhang’s explanations for these inconsistencies. See Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d

1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2011). In the absence of credible testimony, Zhang’s asylum

and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153,

1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Finally, Zhang does not raise any arguments regarding the denial of CAT

relief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues

not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-71689
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Henry W. Nozko, Jr., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ACMAT Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of ACMAT as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
      report;

4.    ACMAT's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for ACMAT and we have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ACMAT,
            including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
            others within those entities, particularly during the period in
            which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of ACMAT's disclosure controls and
            procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
            end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
            and

      c)    disclosed in this report any change in the ACMAT's internal control
            over financial reporting that occurred during the ACMAT's most
            recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
            likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
            financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the board of
      directors;

      a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect ACMAT's ability to record,
            process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2004                      /s/ Henry W. Nozko, Jr.
                                           -----------------------
                                           Chief Executive Officer
§ 401.18 Steering lights. Every vessel shall be equipped with: ( a ) A steering light located on the centerline at or near the stem of the vessel and clearly visible from the helm; or
( b ) Two steering lights located at equal distances either side of the centerline at the forepart of the vessel and clearly visible from the bridge along a line parallel to the keel.
[49 FR 30935, Aug. 2, 1984]